text
stringlengths 601
2.62k
|
|---|
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is payable in 2022?
Context: the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ; the 2019 of amount is 14 ; the 2020 of amount is 12 ; the 2021 of amount is 9 ; the 2022 of amount is 8 ; the thereafter of amount is 65 ;
### Output:
Logic: from here you need to take the amount payable in 2018 , or $ 15 , and divide by the total or 123 to get 12.2% ( 15/123 = 12.2% )
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount payable in 2022: $8
Total amount payable (2018-2022 + thereafter): $15 + $14 + $12 + $9 + $8 + $65 = $123
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 12 to 9 which gives add(12, 9)
step 2: add 15 to 14 which gives add(15, 14)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14))
step 4: add 8 to 65 which gives add(8, 65)
step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in comparing 2010 and 2012 figures , how much additional capital , in percentage , is required in 2012 for the firm to meet regulatory and debt obligations?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in billions ) the other ( a ) of yearly average 2012 is 50.2 ; the other ( a ) of yearly average 2011 is 46.6 ; the other ( a ) of yearly average 2010 is 34.5 ; the firm measures economic capital primarily based on four risk factors : credit , market , operational and private equity risk. . ( a ) reflects additional capital required , in the firm 2019s view , to meet its regulatory and debt rating objectives .
### Output:
Logic: 34.5*x=50.2
The required values from the context for the question are:
Yearly average for 2012: 50.2
Yearly average for 2010: 34.5
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 50.2 by 34.5 which gives divide(50.2, 34.5)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(50.2, 34.5), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(50.2, 34.5), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage growth in operating expenses from 2013 to 2014
Context: the total operating expenses net of 2014 is 19 ; the total operating expenses net of 2013 is 26 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent growth from year to year is the change from year to year divided by the base year
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total operating expenses for 2014: 19
Total operating expenses for 2013: 26
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 26 from 19 which gives subtract(19, 26)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 26 which gives divide(subtract(19, 26), 26)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(19, 26), 26), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(19, 26), 26), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the anticipated growth rate of the unrecognized tax benefits in 2008
Context: we expect our unrecognized tax benefits to increase by $ 2.7 million during 2008 . included in the unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9.4 million at december 31 , 2007 was $ 9.4 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would reduce our annual effective tax rate .
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change divided by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected increase in unrecognized tax benefits during 2008: $2.7 million
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007: $9.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2.7 by 9.4 which gives divide(2.7, 9.4)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2.7, 9.4), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2.7, 9.4), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the change in value of unvested grants from 2014 to 2016?
Context: the unvested at may 31 2014 of shares is 1754 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 22.72 ; the unvested at may 31 2016 of shares is 1606 ; the unvested at may 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 37.25 ; the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value .
### Output:
Logic: to find the change in unvested grants one must find the value of each unvested grant by multiplying the price by the amount . the one must subtract the two years from each other to find the change .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unvested shares at May 31, 2014: 1,754
Weighted-average grant-date fair value at May 31, 2014: $22.72
Unvested shares at May 31, 2016: 1,606
Weighted-average grant-date fair value at May 31, 2016: $37.25
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1754 by 22.72 which gives multiply(1754, 22.72)
step 2: multiply 1606 by 37.25 which gives multiply(1606, 37.25)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(1606, 37.25), multiply(1754, 22.72)),
The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(1606, 37.25), multiply(1754, 22.72)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage of consolidated net sales from 2006 to 2008?
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 8093 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 5400 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is 43% ( 43 % ) ; in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 and 13% ( 13 % ) in 2006 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the consolidated net sales one must take the percentages given in line 17 and multiple it by the segmented net sales given in the table . the two products are then subtracted from each other . the answer is then divided by the consolidated net sales for 2006 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment net sales for 2008: $8,093 million
Segment net sales for 2007: $7,729 million
Segment net sales for 2006: $5,400 million
Segment net sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales for 2008: 27%
Segment net sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales for 2007: 21%
Segment net sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales for 2006: 13%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 5400 by 13% which gives multiply(5400, 13%)
step 2: multiply 8093 by 27% which gives multiply(8093, 27%)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(8093, 27%), multiply(5400, 13%))
step 4: multiply 5400 by 13% which gives multiply(5400, 13%)
step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(8093, 27%), multiply(5400, 13%)), multiply(5400, 13%)),
The final logic expression is divide(subtract(multiply(8093, 27%), multiply(5400, 13%)), multiply(5400, 13%)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total net revenue between 2009 and 2010
Context: the 2009 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 243.0 ; the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 272.9 ;
### Output:
Logic: [3] : gross operating revenues gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to : a decrease of $ 16.2 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates ; a decrease of $ 15.4 million in gross gas revenues primarily due to lower fue
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net revenue for 2009: $243.0 million
Net revenue for 2010: $272.9 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 272.9 to 243.0 which gives add(272.9, 243.0),
The final logic expression is add(272.9, 243.0).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Context: december 31 ( in dollars ) the jpmorgan chase of 2012 is $ 100.00 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2013 is $ 136.71 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2014 is $ 150.22 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2015 is $ 162.79 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2016 is $ 219.06 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2017 is $ 277.62 ; december 31 ( in dollars ) the kbw bank index of 2012 is 100.00 ; the kbw bank index of 2013 is 137.76 ; the kbw bank index of 2014 is 150.66 ; the kbw bank index of 2015 is 151.39 ; the kbw bank index of 2016 is 194.55 ; the kbw bank index of 2017 is 230.72 ;
### Output:
Logic: outperform = greater 5 year total return
The required values from the context for the question are:
JPMorgan Chase 2012: $100.00
JPMorgan Chase 2017: $277.62
KBW Bank Index 2012: 100.00
KBW Bank Index 2017: 230.72
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is greater(277.62, 230.72).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percent of the labor-related deemed claim to the total re-organization costs in 2013
Context: the labor-related deemed claim ( 1 ) of 2013 is $ 1733 ; the total reorganization items net of 2013 is $ 2640 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent is the amount divided by the total amount multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
Labor-related deemed claim for 2013: $1,733
Total reorganization items for 2013: $2,640
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1733 by 2640 which gives divide(1733, 2640)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1733, 2640), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1733, 2640), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how bigger are the expenses with depreciation depletion and amortization as a percent of capital expenditures in 2016?
Context: for the year ended december 31 , the depreciation depletion and amortization of 2016 is $ 593 ; for the year ended december 31 , the capital expenditures of 2016 is $ 298 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the depreciation depletion and amortization expenses divided by capital expenditures , then subtracted 1 , which is going to represent the percentual increase of the depreciation depletion and amortization concerning the capital expenditures expenses .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization for 2016: $593
Capital expenditures for 2016: $298
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 593 by 298 which gives divide(593, 298)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(593, 298), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(593, 298), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(593, 298), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: based on the year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) information what was the net profit margin
Context: the revenue of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is $ 9362.2 ; the revenue of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is $ 9244.9 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is 285.7 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is 423.2 ;
### Output:
Logic: the net profit margin is the net income divide by the revenues
The required values from the context for the question are:
Revenue for 2008: $9,362.2 million
Net income for 2008: 285.7 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 285.7 by 9362.2 which gives divide(285.7, 9362.2)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based per year?
Context: as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years .
### Output:
Logic: to find the average per year one must take the total and divide that by the amount of years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards as of May 31, 2016: $42.6 million
Weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized: 1.9 years
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 42.6 by 1.9 which gives divide(42.6, 1.9),
The final logic expression is divide(42.6, 1.9).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of the assets , purchased in the acquisition , are tangible?
Context: goodwill the customer-related intangible assets of $ 6286 is 3248 ; goodwill the contract-based intangible assets of $ 6286 is 952 ; money transfer branch locations during 2009 , we completed the second and final series of money transfer branch location acquisitions in the united states as part of an assignment and asset purchase agreement with a privately held company . goodwill the property and equipment of $ 6286 is 300 ; goodwill the total assets acquired of $ 6286 is 11010 ;
### Output:
Logic: tangible assets do not include goodwill , nontangible assets , and trademark . therefore we must divide equipment by total assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total assets acquired: $11010
Property and equipment (tangible asset) value: $300
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 300 to 11010 which gives add(300, 11010)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(add(300, 11010), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(add(300, 11010), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what would be the total amount of long-term debt if they were to include fair value of debt step-up?
Context: ( in millions ) the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period total is $ 6039.0 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2019 is $ 726.6 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2020and 2021 is $ 824.8 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2022and 2023 is $ 1351.0 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period thereafter is $ 3136.6 ; ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 205.2 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations .
### Output:
Logic: to find the total long-term debt you need to add up all the years from the table . this should give you $ 12078 million . then , as in the question , you need to add in the fair value of debt step-up which was $ 205.2 million . this puts your total at $ 12283.2 million .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total long-term debt (from all years provided): $6039.0 million
Fair value of debt step-up: $205.2 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 824.8 to 726.6 which gives add(824.8, 726.6)
step 2: add 6039.0 to 205.2 which gives add(6039.0, 205.2)
step 3: add 3136.6 to 1351.0 which gives add(3136.6, 1351.0)
step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(add(6039.0, 205.2), add(3136.6, 1351.0))
step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(824.8, 726.6), add(add(6039.0, 205.2), add(3136.6, 1351.0))),
The final logic expression is add(add(824.8, 726.6), add(add(6039.0, 205.2), add(3136.6, 1351.0))).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much more operational risk , in billions , did the firm take on in 2010 and 2011 combined than in 2012?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in billions ) the operational risk of yearly average 2012 is 15.9 ; the operational risk of yearly average 2011 is 8.5 ; the operational risk of yearly average 2010 is 7.4 ; operational risk capital operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes or systems , human factors or external events . the operational risk capital model is based on actual losses and potential scenario-based losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment . the increase in operational risk capital in 2012 was primarily due to continued model enhancements to better capture large historical loss events , including mortgage-related litigation costs . the increases that occurred during 2012 will be fully reflected in average operational risk capital in 2013 . see operational risk management on pages 175 2013176 of this annual report for more information about operational risk .
### Output:
Logic: the total of operational risk of 2010 ( 7.4 ) and 2011 ( 8.5 ) equals 15.9 , the same number in billions of operational risk in 2012 ( 15.9 )
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operational risk in 2012: 15.9 billion
Operational risk in 2011: 8.5 billion
Operational risk in 2010: 7.4 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 8.5 to 7.4 which gives add(8.5, 7.4)
step 2: add 8.5 to 7.4 which gives add(8.5, 7.4)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(add(8.5, 7.4), add(8.5, 7.4)),
The final logic expression is subtract(add(8.5, 7.4), add(8.5, 7.4)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the decrease in the number of dollars obtained with the sale of primary aluminum during 2013 and 2014?
Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5591 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 6800 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 6596 ; the sale of primary aluminum represents approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of this segment 2019s third-party sales .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the number of third-party sales of primary aluminum in 2014 and 2013 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Third-party sales of primary aluminum in 2013: $6596
Third-party sales of primary aluminum in 2014: $6800
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 6596 by 90% which gives multiply(6596, 90%)
step 2: multiply 6800 by 90% which gives multiply(6800, 90%)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(6800, 90%), multiply(6596, 90%)),
The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(6800, 90%), multiply(6596, 90%)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentual decrease observed in alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum during 2014 and 2015?
Context: the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum* of 2015 is $ 3514 ; the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum* of 2014 is $ 3743 ; the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum* of 2013 is $ 3730 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual decrease of alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum , which is calculated by dividing the value in 2015 by the value in 2014 , then turned into a percentage.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2015: $3514
Average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014: $3743
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 3743 by 3514 which gives divide(3743, 3514)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1), const_100)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the number of units necessary to stabilize the acklen west end community?
Context: community the acklen west end of market is nashville tn ; the acklen west end of units is 320 ; the acklen west end of closing date is december 28 2017 ; communities are considered stabilized after achieving 90% ( 90 % ) occupancy for 90 days .
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum percentage of 90% multiplied by the number of units .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total units in the Acklen West End community: 320
Required occupancy rate for stabilization: 90%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 90% by 320 which gives multiply(90%, 320),
The final logic expression is multiply(90%, 320).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percent of the sfas 158 adoption adjustments for the deferred taxes to the amount prior to the adjustments
Context: the deferred taxes ( current ) of prior to application of sfas 158 is $ 191 ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of sfas 158 adoption adjustments is $ -28 ( 28 ) ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of after application of sfas 158 is $ 163 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent change is the amount divide by the total amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deferred taxes prior to the application of SFAS 158: $191
SFAS 158 adoption adjustments: -$28
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 28 by const_m1 which gives multiply(28, const_m1)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 191 which gives divide(multiply(28, const_m1), 191)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(multiply(28, const_m1), 191), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(multiply(28, const_m1), 191), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the original value of computer software , in dollars?
Context: december 31 2015 the computer software of gross carrying amount is $ 793 ; the computer software of accumulated amortization is $ -643 ( 643 ) ; december 31 , 2015 carrying amount accumulated amortization .
### Output:
Logic: the original value is calculated based upon the gross carrying amount formula , in which the carrying amount is equal to the original value mines the amortization/depreciation costs .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Gross carrying amount of computer software in 2015: $793
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 793 to 643 which gives add(793, 643),
The final logic expression is add(793, 643).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2011 , what is the percentage of capital leases among the total future minimum payments?
Context: the 2011 of total is 80823 ; the 2011 of capital leases is 1978 ; the 2011 of operating leases is 11555 ; the 2011 of sponsorship licensing & other is 67290 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of capital leases divided by the total value of future minimum payments , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total future minimum payments in 2011: 80823
Capital leases in 2011: 1978
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1978 by 80823 which gives divide(1978, 80823)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1978, 80823), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1978, 80823), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2015 what is the anticipated percentage increase in aircraft fuel expense from 2014
Context: based on our 2015 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that , as of december 31 , 2014 , a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price would increase our 2015 annual fuel expense by $ 43 million . year the 2014 of gallons is 3644 ; the 2014 of average price per gallon is $ 2.91 ; the 2014 of aircraft fuel expense is $ 10592 ; the 2014 of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent increase is the change divided by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Gallons in 2014: 3644
Average price per gallon in 2014: $2.91
Aircraft fuel expense in 2014: $10592
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 43 by 10592 which gives divide(43, 10592)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(43, 10592), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(43, 10592), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual increase expense related to these plans during 2002 and 2003?
Context: during the years ended december 25 , 2004 , december 27 , 2003 , and december 28 , 2002 , expense related to these plans of $ 5183 , $ 4197 , and $ 2728 , respectively , was charged to operations .
### Output:
Logic: it is the 2003's expense divided by 2002 one .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expense related to the plans in 2002: $2728
Expense related to the plans in 2003: $4197
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 4197 by 2728 which gives divide(4197, 2728)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(4197, 2728), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(4197, 2728), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(4197, 2728), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the decrease between the goodwill impairment recorded by alcoa during the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2015?
Context: therefore , in the fourth quarter of 2015 , alcoa recorded a goodwill impairment of $ 25 . therefore , in the fourth quarter of 2013 , alcoa recorded a goodwill impairment of $ 1731 ( $ 1719 after noncontrolling interest ) .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those two goodwill impairment recorded values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2015: $25
Goodwill impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013: $1731
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 25 from 1731 which gives subtract(1731, 25),
The final logic expression is subtract(1731, 25).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2016 and 2017 , what is the increase observed in accretion?
Context: the accretion of 2017 is 34708 ; the accretion of 2016 is 32306 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the 2017's accretion divided by the 2016's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Accretion in 2016: 32306
Accretion in 2017: 34708
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 34708 by 32306 which gives divide(34708, 32306)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(34708, 32306), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(34708, 32306), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(34708, 32306), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: by what total amount , from 2013 to 2014 , did total derivative receivable balances decrease or payable balances increase?
Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the derivatives cva ( b ) of 2014 is -2674 ( 2674 ) ; the derivatives cva ( b ) of 2013 is -2352 ( 2352 ) ; december 31 ( in millions ) the derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) of 2014 is -380 ( 380 ) ; the derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) of 2013 is -322 ( 322 ) ; ( b ) positive cva and dva/fva represent amounts that increased receivable balances or decreased payable balances ; negative cva and dva/fva represent amounts that decreased receivable balances or increased payable balances .
### Output:
Logic: since negative cva/dva/fva result from decreased receivables or increased payables , add all negative cva/dva/fva for the two years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Derivatives CVA 2014: -2674
Derivatives CVA 2013: -2352
Derivatives DVA and FVA 2014: -380
Derivatives DVA and FVA 2013: -322
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 2674 to 2352 which gives add(2674, 2352)
step 2: add 380 to 322 which gives add(380, 322)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(2674, 2352), add(380, 322)),
The final logic expression is add(add(2674, 2352), add(380, 322)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 31 . 2015 what was the % ( % ) of shares available for grant under the 2007 plan .
Context: as of december 31 , 2015 , 8.4 shares were available for grant under the 2007 plan . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 .
### Output:
Logic: the % available for grant is the ratio of the available amount to the amount authorized .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Shares available for grant as of December 31, 2015: 8.4
Total shares under the 2007 plan: 15.5
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 8.4 by 15.5 which gives divide(8.4, 15.5)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(8.4, 15.5), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(8.4, 15.5), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average expected volatility?
Context: the expected volatility of 2016 is 32.48% ( 32.48 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2015 is 29.35% ( 29.35 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2014 is 32.18% ( 32.18 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all percentages of expected volatility divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected volatility 2016: 32.48%
Expected volatility 2015: 29.35%
Expected volatility 2014: 32.18%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply table_average(expected volatility, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(expected volatility, none), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(expected volatility, none), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the twelve months ended december 31 , 2017 , what was the percentual increase observed in total puds?
Context: for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2017 , total puds increased by 110 mmboe to 1163 mmboe .
### Output:
Logic: it is the total pud of 1163 mmboe at the end of the period divided by the initial one ( 110 mmboe ) , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total PUDs increase: 110 mmboe
Total PUDs end of 2017: 1163 mmboe
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1163 by 110 which gives divide(1163, 110)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1163, 110), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1163, 110), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1163, 110), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the class a common stocks , what is the percentage's increase of the number issued to participating employees in relation non-executive directors amidst 2016 and 2017?
Context: in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: considering the class a common stocks issued between 2016 and 2017 , the ratio of the variation of stocks issued to employees and non directors is calculated dividing the number of shares issued in 2017 by the number issued in 2016 , then dividing both results .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Class A common stock issued to participating employees 2017: 19936
Class A common stock issued to participating employees 2016: 19858
Class A common stock issued to non-executive directors 2017: 19736
Class A common stock issued to non-executive directors 2016: 26439
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 19936 by 19858 which gives divide(19936, 19858)
step 2: divide 19736 by 26439 which gives divide(19736, 26439)
step 3: divide the expression of step 1 by the expression of step 2 which gives divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439))
step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439)), const_1)
step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439)), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439)), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the increase observed in the export sales among net sales during 2008 and 2009?
Context: segment information 2013 ( concluded ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 246 million , $ 277 million and $ 275 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of sales in 2009 divided by the 2008's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Export sales 2009: $277 million
Export sales 2008: $275 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 277 by 275 which gives divide(277, 275)
step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(277, 275), 1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(277, 275), 1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(277, 275), 1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much segmented net sales was earned in the north america in 2007?
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 9164 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005 is $ 9037 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 20142006 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2006 20142005 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 .
### Output:
Logic: in line 29 , it explains that 52% of segmented net sales was done in north america in 2007 . to find out how much net sales was created in north america we must multiple 52% by the 2007 segmented net sales . this then gives us $ 5207.3
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment net sales 2007: $10014
North America sales as a percentage of segment net sales in 2007: 52%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 10014 by 52% which gives multiply(10014, 52%),
The final logic expression is multiply(10014, 52%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: for the $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , what percentage was the structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution?
Context: during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million . upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
### Output:
Logic: converted the billions to millions
The required values from the context for the question are:
Stock repurchase program: $1.6 billion
Structured stock repurchase agreement: $80.0 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1.6 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.6, const_1000)
step 2: divide 80.0 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(80.0, multiply(1.6, const_1000))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(80.0, multiply(1.6, const_1000)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(80.0, multiply(1.6, const_1000)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average yearly benefit payment for the years 2015-2019?
Context: the 2015 2013 2019 of benefit payments is 22686 ; the 2015 2013 2019 of expected subsidy receipts is 1071 ; the 2015 2013 2019 of net benefit payments is 21615 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all benefit payments for the years 2015-2019 divided by five ( the period ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Benefit payments 2015-2019: 22686
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 22686 by const_5 which gives divide(22686, const_5),
The final logic expression is divide(22686, const_5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average equity as adjusted?
Context: as of december 31 the equity as adjusted of 2008 is $ 5415 ; the equity as adjusted of 2007 is $ 6261 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of both values of equity as adjusted divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Equity as adjusted 2008: $5415
Equity as adjusted 2007: $6261
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(equity as adjusted, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the combined number of equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 2956907 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 35.01 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 2786760 ;
### Output:
Logic: the combined amount is the sum of both security types
The required values from the context for the question are:
Securities to be issued upon exercise: 2956907
Securities remaining available for future issuance: 2786760
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 2956907 to 2786760 which gives add(2956907, 2786760),
The final logic expression is add(2956907, 2786760).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the increase observed in the accounts payable and other liabilities during the years 2008-2009 , in millions?
Context: ( in millions ) the accounts payable andother liabilities of 2009 is 31 ; the accounts payable andother liabilities of 2008 is -285 ( 285 ) ; the accounts payable andother liabilities of 2007 is 2 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values during 2008 and 2009 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Accounts payable and other liabilities 2009: 31
Accounts payable and other liabilities 2008: -285
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract -285 from 31 which gives subtract(31, -285),
The final logic expression is subtract(31, -285).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual growth of the global products' atoi concerning the total atoi for all segments during the years 2014-2015?
Context: the atoi of 2016 is $ 269 ; the atoi of 2015 is $ 225 ; the atoi of 2014 is $ 224 ; atoi for all reportable segments totaled $ 1087 in 2016 , $ 986 in 2015 , and $ 983 in 2014 . global rolled products ( 1 ) .
### Output:
Logic: it s the difference between the percentage of global products' atoi of each year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
ATOI 2016: $269
ATOI 2015: $225
ATOI 2014: $224
ATOI for all reportable segments 2016: $1087
ATOI for all reportable segments 2015: $986
ATOI for all reportable segments 2014: $983
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 224 by 983 which gives divide(224, 983)
step 2: divide 225 by 986 which gives divide(225, 986)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(225, 986), divide(224, 983))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(225, 986), divide(224, 983)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(225, 986), divide(224, 983)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for the years 2007-2009?
Context: the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all contribution expenses in these years divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Contribution expense 2009: $40627
Contribution expense 2008: $35341
Contribution expense 2007: $26996
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 40627 to 35341 which gives add(40627, 35341)
step 2: add 26996 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(26996, add(40627, 35341))
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(26996, add(40627, 35341)), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(26996, add(40627, 35341)), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the variation observed in the foreign currency translation , in millions?
Context: the foreign currency translation of 2009 is 2 ; the foreign currency translation of 2008 is -6 ( 6 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2009 foreign currency translation: 2
2008 foreign currency translation: -6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract -6 from 2 which gives subtract(2, -6),
The final logic expression is subtract(2, -6).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in accrued capital expenditures during 2016 and 2017?
Context: eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of accrued capital expenditures in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Accrued capital expenditures 2017: $475 million
Accrued capital expenditures 2016: $388 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 475 by 388 which gives divide(475, 388)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(475, 388), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(475, 388), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(475, 388), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much has the balance increased in a percentage from 2016 to 2018?
Context: the balance at end of fiscal year of 2018 is $ 229.4 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2017 is $ 219.1 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2016 is $ 177.2 ; the following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in millions ) : .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage increase you must first subtract 2018 by 2016 and then take that answer and divide by 2016 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance 2018: $229.4
Balance 2016: $177.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 177.2 from 229.4 which gives subtract(229.4, 177.2)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 177.2 which gives divide(subtract(229.4, 177.2), 177.2)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(229.4, 177.2), 177.2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(229.4, 177.2), 177.2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the depreciation expense with the production facilities within the merchant gases segment accumulated in 15 years?
Context: the merchant gases of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 30 ; the merchant gases of increase life by 1 year is $ -20 ( 20 ) ; the depreciable lives of production facilities within the merchant gases segment are principally 15 years .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of years expected in its depreciable life multiplied by the increased life by a 1-year value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increase life by 1 year for merchant gases: $-20
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 15 by 20 which gives multiply(15, 20),
The final logic expression is multiply(15, 20).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2015 , what is the impact of the large market among the same store portfolio?
Context: the large market same store of year ended december 31 2015 is $ 168872 ; the large market same store of year ended december 31 2014 is $ 174957 ; the large market same store of increase is $ -6085 ( 6085 ) ; the large market same store of percentage increase is ( 3.5 ) % ( % ) ; the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2015 is 253880 ; the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2014 is 261015 ; the same store portfolio of increase is -7135 ( 7135 ) ; the same store portfolio of percentage increase is ( 2.7 ) % ( % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the large market same-store divided by the total same-store portfolio , then turned into a percentage to represent the impact .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Large market same store 2015: $168872
Same store portfolio 2015: 253880
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 168872 by 253880 which gives divide(168872, 253880)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(168872, 253880), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(168872, 253880), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the combined equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 1955024 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 36.06 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4078093 ;
### Output:
Logic: the combined amount is the sum
The required values from the context for the question are:
Securities to be issued: 1955024
Remaining securities for future issuance: 4078093
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 1955024 to 4078093 which gives add(1955024, 4078093),
The final logic expression is add(1955024, 4078093).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 31 , 2013 , what is the value of securities remaining available for future issuance
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 2956907 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 35.01 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 2786760 ;
### Output:
Logic: the value is the product of the number of securities and the price
The required values from the context for the question are:
Securities remaining for future issuance 2013: 2786760
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 2786760 by 35.01 which gives multiply(2786760, 35.01),
The final logic expression is multiply(2786760, 35.01).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average operating margin?
Context: years ended december 31 , the operating margin of 2011 is 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2010 is 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all operating margins divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating margin 2011: 19.3%
Operating margin 2010: 18.6%
Operating margin 2009: 14.3%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply table_average(operating margin, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(operating margin, none), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(operating margin, none), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual fluctuation of the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3's exposure net of all collateral in relation with the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 during 2017 and 2018?
Context: rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 11831 ; the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of exposure net of all collateral is $ 11529 ; the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 29% ( 29 % ) ; rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 6373 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between those percentual variations during 2017 and 2018 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
AAA/AAA to AA-/AA3 % exposure 2017: 31%
AAA/AAA to AA-/AA3 % exposure 2018: 29%
BB+/BA1 to B-/B3 % exposure 2017: 16
BB+/BA1 to B-/B3 % exposure 2018: 18
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 31% from 29% which gives subtract(29%, 31%)
step 2: subtract 16 from 18 which gives subtract(18, 16)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(18, 16), subtract(29%, 31%))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(18, 16), subtract(29%, 31%)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(18, 16), subtract(29%, 31%)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2008-2010 , what is the average income from cash and cash investments , in millions?
Context: the income from cash and cash investments of 2010 is $ 6 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2009 is $ 7 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2008 is $ 22 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all income from cash and cash investments' value for these years , then divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Income from cash and investments 2010: $6
Income from cash and investments 2009: $7
Income from cash and investments 2008: $22
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(income from cash and cash investments, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the increase in the increase to allowance value from 2015 to 2016?
Context: december 31 , the increase to allowance of 2016 is 772 ; the increase to allowance of 2015 is 180 ; the increase to allowance of 2014 is 102 ; the following table details the changes in the valuation allowance: .
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual increase observed in the increase to allowance value , which is calculated by dividing the 2016's value by the 2015's then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increase to allowance 2016: 772
Increase to allowance 2015: 180
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 772 by 180 which gives divide(772, 180)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100)
step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100), const_100)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the annual average number of liquid securities and other cash considerations?
Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2014 is -19604 ( 19604 ) ; the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2013 is -14435 ( 14435 ) ; government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor .
### Output:
Logic: add the total number of liquid securities from 2013 and 2014 , to get 34039 million , and then divide by the total number of years , 2 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Liquid securities and other cash collateral of 2014: 19604
Liquid securities and other cash collateral of 2013: 14435
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 19604 to 14435 which gives add(19604, 14435)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(19604, 14435), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(19604, 14435), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the net change in the 25 basis point decrease and increase in discount rate in 2012 in millions
Context: ( $ in millions ) the 25 basis point decrease in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense is $ 18 ; the 25 basis point decrease in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in december 31 2011 obligations is $ 146 ; ( $ in millions ) the 25 basis point increase in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense is -17 ( 17 ) ; the 25 basis point increase in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in december 31 2011 obligations is -154 ( 154 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the net change in 2012 was the sum of the increase and decrease in the 25 basis point discount rate
The required values from the context for the question are:
25 basis point decrease in 2012 expense: 18
25 basis point increase in 2012 expense: -17
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 18 to -17 which gives add(18, -17),
The final logic expression is add(18, -17).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the british pound among the total foreign currency forward contracts?
Context: at june 30 , 2013 , we had foreign currency forward contracts in the amount of $ 1579.6 million . the foreign currencies included in foreign currency forward contracts ( notional value stated in u.s . dollars ) are principally the british pound ( $ 426.2 million ) , euro ( $ 268.8 million ) , canadian dollar ( $ 198.6 million ) , swiss franc ( $ 111.5 mil- lion ) , australian dollar ( $ 92.1 million ) , thailand baht ( $ 75.5 million ) and hong kong dollar ( $ 58.1 million ) .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of dollars in the british pound divided by the total amount of foreign currency forward contracts .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total foreign currency forward contracts: 1579.6
British pound value: 426.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 426.2 by 1579.6 which gives divide(426.2, 1579.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(426.2, 1579.6), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(426.2, 1579.6), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total sales revenue in 2015 in millions
Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr is $ 1570 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 ) is $ 1745 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr is $ 1800 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 ) is $ 1905 ;
### Output:
Logic: the sales is the sum of all quarterly sales
The required values from the context for the question are:
Sales and service revenues 2015 1st qtr: 1570
Sales and service revenues 2015 2nd qtr: 1745
Sales and service revenues 2015 3rd qtr: 1800
Sales and service revenues 2015 4th qtr: 1905
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 1570 to 1745 which gives add(1570, 1745)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1800 which gives add(add(1570, 1745), 1800),
The final logic expression is add(add(1570, 1745), 1800).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the statistical interval for 2017's interest income using 2016's interest income as a midpoint?
Context: the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels .
### Output:
Logic: to find the statistical interval you need to subtract the change and also add the change to the year 2016 . this will give you a range of the next year to come .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2016 interest income: 20.1
Change in interest rate: 11.0
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 11.0 from 20.1 which gives subtract(20.1, 11.0),
The final logic expression is subtract(20.1, 11.0).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the change in the rental amount from 2017 to 2018 in millions
Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 29 million , $ 24 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ;
### Output:
Logic: the change is the difference between the two periods
The required values from the context for the question are:
Rental expenses 2017: 29
Rental expenses 2018: 15
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 15 from 29 which gives subtract(29, 15),
The final logic expression is subtract(29, 15).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2015 , what was the increase in the additions for tax positions of prior years , in dollars?
Context: december 31 , the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2016 is - ; the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is 14 ; the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is 4 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those two additions for tax positions of prior years' values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Additions for tax positions of 2015: 14
Additions for tax positions of 2014: 4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 4 from 14 which gives subtract(14, 4),
The final logic expression is subtract(14, 4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between the number of units in charlotte at midtown and acklen west end?
Context: community the charlotte at midtown of market is nashville tn ; the charlotte at midtown of units is 279 ; the charlotte at midtown of closing date is march 16 2017 ; community the acklen west end of market is nashville tn ; the acklen west end of units is 320 ; the acklen west end of closing date is december 28 2017 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the number of units at each location .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Units in Charlotte at Midtown: 279
Units in Acklen West End: 320
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 279 from 320 which gives subtract(320, 279),
The final logic expression is subtract(320, 279).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2012-2013 and the gaap basis , what was the percentual increase in the effective tax rate?
Context: 2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between each year's effective tax rate .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Effective tax rate 2013: 21.9%
Effective tax rate 2012: 22.8%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21.9 from 22.8 which gives subtract(22.8, 21.9)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(22.8, 21.9), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(22.8, 21.9), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual growth observed in the percentage of asset impairment costs concerning the restructuring and other charges costs during 2013 and 2014?
Context: the asset impairments of 2015 is $ 335 ; the asset impairments of 2014 is $ 406 ; the asset impairments of 2013 is $ 116 ; the restructuring and other charges of 2015 is $ 1195 ; the restructuring and other charges of 2014 is $ 1168 ; the restructuring and other charges of 2013 is $ 782 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the percentage of asset impairment costs concerning the restructuring and other charges costs in 2013 and 2014
The required values from the context for the question are:
Asset impairments 2014: 406
Asset impairments 2013: 116
Restructuring and other charges 2014: 1168
Restructuring and other charges 2013: 782
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 116 by 782 which gives divide(116, 782)
step 2: divide 406 by 1168 which gives divide(406, 1168)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(406, 1168), divide(116, 782))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(406, 1168), divide(116, 782)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(406, 1168), divide(116, 782)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed in the percentual increase of the same store portfolio and the non-same store revenue during 2013 and 2014?
Context: the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2014 is 498829 ; the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2013 is 483658 ; the same store portfolio of increase is 15171 ; the same store portfolio of percentage increase is 3.1% ( 3.1 % ) ; the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2014 is 493349 ; the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2013 is 151185 ; the non-same store and other of increase is 342164 ; the non-same store and other of percentage increase is 226.3% ( 226.3 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those percentages .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Same store portfolio 2014: 498829
Same store portfolio 2013: 483658
Non-same store and other 2014: 493349
Non-same store and other 2013: 151185
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 3.1% from 226.3% which gives subtract(226.3%, 3.1%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(226.3%, 3.1%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(226.3%, 3.1%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the depreciation expense with the production facilities within the electronics and performance materials segment accumulated in 10 years?
Context: the electronics and performance materials of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 16 ; the electronics and performance materials of increase life by 1 year is $ -10 ( 10 ) ; the depreciable lives of production facilities within the electronics and performance materials segment , where there is not an associated long-term supply agreement , range from 10 to 15 years .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of years expected in its depreciable life multiplied by the increased life by a 1-year value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Decrease life by 1 year in Electronics and Performance Materials: 16
Increase life by 1 year in Electronics and Performance Materials: -10
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 10 by 10 which gives multiply(10, 10),
The final logic expression is multiply(10, 10).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: between 2015 and 2013 what was the average compensation expense related to the issuing of the stock award in millions
Context: compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the average is the sum of all amounts divide by the number of amounts
The required values from the context for the question are:
Compensation expense related to stock awards 2015: 43
Compensation expense related to stock awards 2013: 44
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 43 to 34 which gives add(43, 34)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 44 which gives add(add(43, 34), 44)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(43, 34), 44), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(43, 34), 44), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate of the regulatory liability from 2016 to 2017
Context: the total regulatory liabilities of 2017 is $ 1664 ; the total regulatory liabilities of 2016 is $ 403 ;
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divide by the begin balance
The required values from the context for the question are:
Regulatory liabilities 2017: $1664
Regulatory liabilities 2016: $403
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 403 from 1664 which gives subtract(1664, 403)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 403 which gives divide(subtract(1664, 403), 403),
The final logic expression is divide(subtract(1664, 403), 403).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage increase in the allowance in doubtful accounts from 2009 to 2010
Context: the balance at end of year of 2010 is $ 185 ; the balance at end of year of 2009 is $ 160 ; the balance at end of year of 2008 is $ 133 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the recent amount less the prior amount divide by the prior amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance at end of 2010: $185
Balance at end of 2009: $160
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 160 from 185 which gives subtract(185, 160)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 160 which gives divide(subtract(185, 160), 160),
The final logic expression is divide(subtract(185, 160), 160).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: for the three years of 2010 , 2011 and 2012 what was the net cash impact from the 2002 financing entities?
Context: in millions the cash receipts ( c ) of 2012 is 252 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2011 is 192 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2010 is 3 ; in millions the cash payments ( d ) of 2012 is 159 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2011 is 244 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2010 is 8 ;
### Output:
Logic: summing the inflows and outflows gives us a look a the contribution over the 3 years of the financing entities relationship and benefit or drag on the company .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash receipts 2012: 252
Cash receipts 2011: 192
Cash receipts 2010: 3
Cash payments 2012: 159
Cash payments 2011: 244
Cash payments 2010: 8
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 159 to 244 which gives add(159, 244)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 8 which gives add(add(159, 244), 8)
step 3: add 252 to 192 which gives add(252, 192)
step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 3 which gives add(add(252, 192), 3)
step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(add(add(252, 192), 3), add(add(159, 244), 8)),
The final logic expression is subtract(add(add(252, 192), 3), add(add(159, 244), 8)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the impact of the reclassification of non-controlling interests in equity?
Context: as of december 31 the increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests of 2008 is 105 ; the increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests of 2007 is 40 ; as of december 31 the equity as adjusted of 2008 is $ 5415 ; the equity as adjusted of 2007 is $ 6261 ; as of december 31 the equity as previously reported of 2008 is $ 5310 ; the equity as previously reported of 2007 is $ 6221 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests divided by the original equity to calculate its percentual impact .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increase for reclassification 2008: 105
Increase for reclassification 2007: 40
Equity as adjusted 2008: $5415
Equity as adjusted 2007: $6261
Equity as previously reported 2008: $5310
Equity as previously reported 2007: $6221
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 105 by 5310 which gives divide(105, 5310)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(105, 5310), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(105, 5310), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2013 to 2014
Context: we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $ 5.74 , $ 5.27 and $ 4.77 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period
The required values from the context for the question are:
Weighted-average estimated fair values 2014: $5.74
Weighted-average estimated fair values 2013: $5.27
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 5.27 from 5.74 which gives subtract(5.74, 5.27)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 5.27 which gives divide(subtract(5.74, 5.27), 5.27)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(5.74, 5.27), 5.27), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(5.74, 5.27), 5.27), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the statistical interval that interest income can be affected during the next year based on the data from 2013?
Context: during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels .
### Output:
Logic: to find a statistical interval , one must take the data from the year before ( 24.7 ) and add the amount that could change ( 16.4 ) and subtract the amount that could change . this would give you the interval that it would be in-between .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest income 2013: $24.7
Change in interest income: $16.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 16.4 from 24.7 which gives subtract(24.7, 16.4),
The final logic expression is subtract(24.7, 16.4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent increase in net cash from investing activities occurred between 2011 and 2012?
Context: net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles .
### Output:
Logic: subtracting the old value by the new value eliminates the need to subtract 1 at the end . both work , but in this case it made more sense to do it this way .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net cash used in investing 2012: $3245 million
Net cash used in investing 2011: $587 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 2658 from 3245 which gives subtract(3245, 2658)
step 2: divide 2658 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(2658, subtract(3245, 2658))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2658, subtract(3245, 2658)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2658, subtract(3245, 2658)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2016?
Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2554.7 ; the operating activities of 2017 is $ 2534.1 ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 2258.8 ; cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2018 is -1649.1 ( 1649.1 ) ; the investing activities of 2017 is -1417.7 ( 1417.7 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -864.8 ( 864.8 ) ; cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ; the financing activities of 2017 is -2040.9 ( 2040.9 ) ; the financing activities of 2016 is -860.2 ( 860.2 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2016 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating activities 2016: $2258.8
Investing activities 2016: -864.8
Financing activities 2016: -860.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 864.8 from 2258.8 which gives subtract(2258.8, 864.8)
step 2: subtract 860.2 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(2258.8, 864.8), 860.2),
The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(2258.8, 864.8), 860.2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total price for the kmr power corporation purchase in millions?
Context: in december 2000 , the company acquired all of the outstanding shares of kmr power corporation ( 2018 2018kmr 2019 2019 ) , including the buyout of a minority partner in one of kmr 2019s subsidiaries , for approximately $ 64 million and assumed long-term liabilities of approximately $ 245 million .
### Output:
Logic: cash paid plus the assumed debt is the actual price .
The required values from the context for the question are:
KMR Power corporation purchase: $64 million
Assumed liabilities: $245 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 64 to 245 which gives add(64, 245),
The final logic expression is add(64, 245).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of aso's members among the total commercial medical membership?
Context: the aso of smart plans and other consumer membership is 236800 ; the aso of other commercial membership is 1406200 ; the aso of commercial medical membership is 1643000 ; the total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership is 564700 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2886900 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3451600 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of members of the aso plan divided by the total commercial medical membership , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
ASO of smart plans and other consumer membership: 236800
Total commercial medical membership: 3451600
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1643000 by 3451600 which gives divide(1643000, 3451600)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1643000, 3451600), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1643000, 3451600), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of fairvalue of contracts due after ten years among the total?
Context: ( millions ) the due after ten years of amortizedcost is 1 ; the due after ten years of fairvalue is 1 ; ( millions ) the total fixed maturities of amortizedcost is $ 150 ; the total fixed maturities of fairvalue is $ 150 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of those contracts divided by the total , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Due after ten years of fairvalue: 1
Total fixed maturities of fairvalue: $150
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1 by 150 which gives divide(1, 150)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1, 150), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1, 150), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the properties with lease expiration dates in 2020 , what is the average occupied square footage?
Context: property : the 2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas of occupied square footage is 414000 ; the 2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas of lease expiration dates is 2020 ; property : the 2300 discovery drive orlando florida of occupied square footage is 364000 ; the 2300 discovery drive orlando florida of lease expiration dates is 2020 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the occupied square footage for both years divided by two to represent the average .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2601 Research Forest Drive occupied square footage: 414000
2300 Discovery Drive occupied square footage: 364000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 414000 to 364000 which gives add(414000, 364000)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(414000, 364000), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(414000, 364000), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: based on the 2014 actualassetallocation what was the debt to equity ratio
Context: the debt securities of targetassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the debt securities of 2014actualassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the debt securities of 2013actualassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the total of targetassetallocation is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of 2014actualassetallocation is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of 2013actualassetallocation is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the equity securities of targetassetallocation is 30 ; the equity securities of 2014actualassetallocation is 30 ; the equity securities of 2013actualassetallocation is 30 ;
### Output:
Logic: the debt to equity ratio is the ratio of the debt to equity in terms of the financing of the company
The required values from the context for the question are:
Debt securities of 2014actualassetallocation: 70%
Equity securities of 2014actualassetallocation: 30
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 70 by 30 which gives divide(70, 30),
The final logic expression is divide(70, 30).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed in the risk-free rate of return during 2008 and 2009?
Context: the risk-free rate of return of 2009 is 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) ; the risk-free rate of return of 2008 is 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) ; the risk-free rate of return of 2007 is 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Risk-free rate of return of 2009: 2.5%
Risk-free rate of return of 2008: 3.2%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 2.5% from 3.2% which gives subtract(3.2%, 2.5%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(3.2%, 2.5%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(3.2%, 2.5%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much percent did the income tax benefit increase from 2014 to 2016?
Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2016 is $ 30809 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 21056 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 is $ 29793 ; the income tax benefit of 2016 is $ 9879 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 6907 ; the income tax benefit of 2014 is $ 7126 ; the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) .
### Output:
Logic: the tax benefit increased 38.6% , one can find this by subtracting 2016 by 2014 tax benefits . then taking the answer and dividing it by 2014 tax benefits .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Income tax benefit of 2016: $9879
Income tax benefit of 2014: $7126
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 7126 from 9879 which gives subtract(9879, 7126)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7126 which gives divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of warehouse locations are located in japan .
Context: in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 78 locations throughout the world : 18 in europe , 21 in japan , 15 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 8 in china , 7 in korea , 6 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage one must divide the warehouse locations in japan by the total warehouse locations .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Warehouse locations in Japan: 21
Total warehouse locations: 78
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 21 by 78 which gives divide(21, 78)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(21, 78), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(21, 78), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate in diluted earnings per share from 2013 to 2014?
Context: the diluted earnings per share of 2014 is $ 2.35 ; the diluted earnings per share of 2013 is $ 2.06 ; the diluted earnings per share of 2012 is $ 2.01 ;
### Output:
Logic: the earnings growth rate is the change in earnings from year to year divided by the starting year ( ( 2.39-2.09 ) /2.09 ) *100?
The required values from the context for the question are:
Diluted earnings per share of 2014: $2.35
Diluted earnings per share of 2013: $2.06
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 2.06 from 2.35 which gives subtract(2.35, 2.06)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(2.35, 2.06), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(2.35, 2.06), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what the total number of votes to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible
Context: the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of affirmative is 141728743 ; the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of against is 297976 ; the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of abstentions is 156165 ;
### Output:
Logic: the total number of votes is the sum of the votes 142182884
The required values from the context for the question are:
Affirmative votes: 141728743
Against votes: 297976
Abstentions: 156165
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 141728743 to 297976 which gives add(141728743, 297976)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 156165 which gives add(add(141728743, 297976), 156165),
The final logic expression is add(add(141728743, 297976), 156165).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the efficiently , in a percent , of converting segmented sales to operating earnings for 2006?
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 8093 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 5400 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is 43% ( 43 % ) ; ( dollars in millions ) the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2008 is 1496 ; the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2007 is 1213 ; the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2006 is 958 ; the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 23% ( 23 % ) ; the operating earnings of 2007 20142006 is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the increase in net sales to the government and public safety market was primarily driven by : ( i ) increased net sales outside of north america , and ( ii ) the net sales generated by vertex standard co. , ltd. , a business the company acquired a controlling interest of in january 2008 , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . on a geographic basis , the segment 2019s net sales were higher in emea , asia and latin america and lower in north america .
### Output:
Logic: to figure out the conversion of segmented sales to operating earnings one must take the operating earnings and divide it by the segmented net sales .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment net sales for 2006: $ 5400
Operating earnings for 2006: $ 958
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 958 by 5400 which gives divide(958, 5400),
The final logic expression is divide(958, 5400).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the debt to equity ratio in 2015
Context: the long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value of 2015 is 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) ; the long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value of 2014 is 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) ; the long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value of 2013 is 49.3% ( 49.3 % ) ; the short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt of 2015 is 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) ; the short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt of 2014 is 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) ; the short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt of 2013 is 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the debt to equity is the division of the total debt by the equity
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value for 2015: 50.6%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 50.6 by 5.9 which gives divide(50.6, 5.9),
The final logic expression is divide(50.6, 5.9).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in a slight recession of the overall market , what percentage did the stock price of global payments change?
Context: the may 31 2007 of global payments is 238.04 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p 500 is 170.85 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p information technology is 152.54 ; the may 31 2008 of global payments is 281.27 ; the may 31 2008 of s&p 500 is 159.41 ; the may 31 2008 of s&p information technology is 156.43 ; issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors .
### Output:
Logic: the s&p 500 is a good indicator of the overall market , therefore when that drops that means there was a slight recession that year . however , global payments did not follow the trend and rose 18.6% . this was calculated by taking the final price and subtracting it by the initial price . then take the answer and dividing by the initial price .
The required values from the context for the question are:
May 31, 2007 Global Payments: 238.04
May 31, 2008 Global Payments: 281.27
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 238.04 from 281.27 which gives subtract(281.27, 238.04),
The final logic expression is subtract(281.27, 238.04).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of other current liabilities among the total liabilities?
Context: the medical and other expenses payable of ( in thousands ) is -71063 ( 71063 ) ; the other current liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -21604 ( 21604 ) ; the other liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -82 ( 82 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of other current liabilities divided by the total liabilities .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Other current liabilities: 21604 (in thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 71063 to 21604 which gives add(71063, 21604)
step 2: add 82 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(82, add(71063, 21604))
step 3: divide 21604 by the expression of step 2 which gives divide(21604, add(82, add(71063, 21604)))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(21604, add(82, add(71063, 21604))), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(21604, add(82, add(71063, 21604))), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total percentage of costs that came from identifiable assets?
Context: cash and cash equivalents the property and equipment of $ 7540 is 5943 ; cash and cash equivalents the identified intangible assets of $ 7540 is 188294 ; cash and cash equivalents the other assets of $ 7540 is 22278 ; cash and cash equivalents the deferred income taxes of $ 7540 is -48448 ( 48448 ) ; cash and cash equivalents the other liabilities of $ 7540 is -31250 ( 31250 ) ; cash and cash equivalents the total identifiable net assets of $ 7540 is 144357 ; cash and cash equivalents the goodwill of $ 7540 is 264844 ; cash and cash equivalents the total purchase consideration of $ 7540 is $ 409201 ; goodwill arising from the acquisition of $ 264.8 million , included in the north america segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities , an assembled workforce and potential synergies from combining our existing businesses .
### Output:
Logic: to find out the identifiable assets one must not include goodwill . therefore to figure out the answer , one will take the total amount and subtract goodwill .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total identifiable net assets: $ 144357
Goodwill: $ 264844
Total purchase consideration: $ 409201
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 264844 from 409201 which gives subtract(409201, 264844),
The final logic expression is subtract(409201, 264844).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage increase in the operating income from 2016 to 2017
Context: 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 .
### Output:
Logic: the percent of the growth is the increase divided by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating income for 2017: $ 21 million
Operating income for 2016: $ 8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_8 from 21 which gives subtract(21, const_8)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_8 which gives divide(subtract(21, const_8), const_8)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(21, const_8), const_8), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(21, const_8), const_8), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the three acquired businesses , that were responsible for the 27% ( 27 % ) improvement in third-party sales?
Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5342 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 4217 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 4054 ; third-party sales for the engineered products and solutions segment improved 27% ( 27 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , largely attributable to the third-party sales ( $ 1310 ) of three acquired businesses ( see above ) , primarily aerospace- related , and higher volumes in this segment 2019s organic businesses , mostly related to the aerospace end market .
### Output:
Logic: it is the total sales of these three aquired businesses divided by the total of the third-party sales.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Third-party sales for 2015: $ 5342
Third-party sales for 2014: $ 4217
Third-party sales of three acquired businesses: $ 1310
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1310 by 5342 which gives divide(1310, 5342)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1310, 5342), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1310, 5342), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the estimated percentual increase observed in the class a common stock during the years 2009 and 2010?
Context: ( in thousands ) the class a common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 66847 ; the class a common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 66511 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the ratio between those two class a common stocks values during 2009 and 2010 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Class A common stock for 2010: 66847 (in thousands)
Class A common stock for 2009: 66511 (in thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 66847 by 66511 which gives divide(66847, 66511)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(66847, 66511), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(66847, 66511), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(66847, 66511), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the final year of the investment , what was the highest return for the initial 100$ ?
Context: the allegion plc of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2013 is 102.20 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2014 is 129.03 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2015 is 154.37 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2016 is 150.97 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2017 is 189.19 ; the s&p 500 of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2013 is 102.53 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2014 is 116.57 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2015 is 118.18 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2016 is 132.31 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2017 is 161.20 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2013 is 104.58 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2014 is 104.84 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2015 is 99.07 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2016 is 130.70 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2017 is 162.97 ; performance graph the annual changes for the period shown december 1 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading ) to december 31 , 2017 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( "s&p 500" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( "s&p 400 capital goods" ) on december 1 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested .
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value of the investment's final year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
allegion plc of december 31 2017: 189.19
s&p 500 of december 31 2017: 161.20
s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2017: 162.97
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 189.19 which gives subtract(189.19, 100),
The final logic expression is subtract(189.19, 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much square feet could the company use to build properies ? ( 1 acre = 43560 square feet )
Context: ( square feet in thousands ) the total of united states is 4809 ; the total of other countries is 2805 ; the total of total is 7614 ; applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space .
### Output:
Logic: the company is able to build properties on the 269 acres that are owned by the company . that is 1.1 million square feet which is calculated by multiplying the number of acres by the conversion of square feet .
The required values from the context for the question are:
united states (square feet in thousands): 4809
other countries (square feet in thousands): 2805
total (square feet in thousands): 7614
acres of buildable land: 269
1 acre: 43560 square feet
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 269 by 43560 which gives multiply(269, 43560)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100000 which gives divide(multiply(269, 43560), const_100000),
The final logic expression is divide(multiply(269, 43560), const_100000).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2008 , what was shareholders equity ( in billions ) , as reported?\\n
Context: ( in billions except ratios ) the assets of reported is $ 2175.1 ; the assets of pro forma ( a ) ( b ) is $ 2218.2 ; ( in billions except ratios ) the liabilities of reported is 2008.2 ; the liabilities of pro forma ( a ) ( b ) is 2051.3 ;
### Output:
Logic: assets - liabilities = se
The required values from the context for the question are:
assets of reported: 2175.1 billion
liabilities of reported: 2008.2 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 2008.2 from 2175.1 which gives subtract(2175.1, 2008.2),
The final logic expression is subtract(2175.1, 2008.2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the average cash paid for income taxes?
Context: cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 10.4 million and $ 80.6 million , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the cash paid during these years divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
cash paid for income taxes 2016: 10.4 million
cash paid for income taxes 2015: 80.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 10.4 to 80.6 which gives add(10.4, 80.6)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(10.4, 80.6), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(10.4, 80.6), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average decrease in the tax position from 2011 to 2013
Context: balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -3734 ( 3734 ) ; balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -2059 ( 2059 ) ; balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -5965 ( 5965 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the average decrease over the 3 years is the sum of the decrease over the 3 years divide by 3
The required values from the context for the question are:
decrease in tax position 2011: -3734
decrease in tax position 2011: -2059
decrease in tax position 2011: -5965
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 3734 to 2059 which gives add(3734, 2059)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 5965 which gives add(add(3734, 2059), 5965)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(3734, 2059), 5965), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(3734, 2059), 5965), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: for 2017 , what percentage of derivative receivables are rated junk?
Context: rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7308 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 645 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 984 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ;
### Output:
Logic: junk = below bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3
The required values from the context for the question are:
bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent %: 18
ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent %: 2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 18 to 2 which gives add(18, 2),
The final logic expression is add(18, 2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2019 , what is the highest projected benefit payment value?
Context: the 2019 of u.s . is 157.2 ; the 2019 of international is 50.2 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value of the projected benefit payment observed in that year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2019 of u.s.: 157.2
2019 of international: 50.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_max(2019, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how long is the weighted- average useful lives of other assets , as a percent of software in the engineered products and solutions segment?
Context: the engineered products and solutions of software is 5 ; the engineered products and solutions of other intangible assets is 33 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the weighted- average useful lives of software ( 5 years ) divided by the weighted- average useful lives of other assets ( 33 years ) , then minus 100% .
The required values from the context for the question are:
engineered products and solutions of software: 5
engineered products and solutions of other intangible assets: 33
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 33 by 5 which gives divide(33, 5)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100)
step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100), const_100)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average number of shares issuable under incentive stock plans , in millions?
Context: in millions the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2016 is 1.1 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2015 is 1.0 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2014 is 1.1 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all shares issuable under incentive stock plans during these years , then divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2016: 1.1 million
shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2015: 1.0 million
shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2014: 1.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(shares issuable under incentive stock plans, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the highest return for the first year of the investment?
Context: the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 140 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 176 ; the hum of 12/31/2016 is $ 202 ; the hum of 12/31/2017 is $ 247 ; the hum of 12/31/2018 is $ 287 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is $ 114 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is $ 115 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2016 is $ 129 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2017 is $ 157 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2018 is $ 150 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 128 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 135 ; the peer group of 12/31/2016 is $ 137 ; the peer group of 12/31/2017 is $ 173 ; the peer group of 12/31/2018 is $ 191 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value for the first year ( 2014 ) , then turned into a percentage to represent the return .
The required values from the context for the question are:
hum of 12/31/2014: $140
s&p 500 of 12/31/2014: $114
peer group of 12/31/2014: $128
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 140 which gives subtract(140, 100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(140, 100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(140, 100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the impact of 2018's unconditional purchase obligations on the total value?
Context: 2016 the 2018 of $ 917 is 63 ; 2016 the total of $ 917 is $ 1370 ; unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: .
### Output:
Logic: it is 2018's value of unconditional purchase obligations divided by the total , then turned into a percentage to represent the impact .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2018 unconditional purchase obligations: $917
total unconditional purchase obligations: $1370
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 63 by 1370 which gives divide(63, 1370)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(63, 1370), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(63, 1370), 100).
### End |