Datasets:

siddanshchawla

/

program_generation_v6

like 0

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2018? Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2554.7 ; the operating activities of 2017 is $ 2534.1 ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 2258.8 ; cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2018 is -1649.1 ( 1649.1 ) ; the investing activities of 2017 is -1417.7 ( 1417.7 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -864.8 ( 864.8 ) ; cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ; the financing activities of 2017 is -2040.9 ( 2040.9 ) ; the financing activities of 2016 is -860.2 ( 860.2 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2018 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2018 operating activities: 2554.7 2018 investing activities: -1649.1 2018 financing activities: -1359.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1649.1 from 2554.7 which gives subtract(2554.7, 1649.1) step 2: subtract 1359.8 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(2554.7, 1649.1), 1359.8), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(2554.7, 1649.1), 1359.8). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: if there were no loan sales in 2010 , what would the total amount of reserves available be , in millions , combined in 2010 and 2011 . Context: in millions the january 1 of 2011 is $ 54 ; the january 1 of 2010 is $ 71 ; in millions the loan sales of 2011 is ; the loan sales of 2010 is -24 ( 24 ) ; in millions the december 31 of 2011 is $ 47 ; the december 31 of 2010 is $ 54 ; the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . ### Output: Logic: add the 24m from the loan sales to the total number The required values from the context for the question are: January 1, 2010 reserves: 71 Loan sales 2010: -24 December 31, 2011 reserves: 47 December 31, 2010 reserves: 54 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 47 to 54 which gives add(47, 54) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 24 which gives add(add(47, 54), 24), The final logic expression is add(add(47, 54), 24). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase of trading during non u.s hours between 2009 and 2010? Context: the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2010 is 13% ( 13 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2009 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2008 is 11% ( 11 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: its the variation between those percentages . The required values from the context for the question are: 2009 trading during non-U.S. hours: 9% 2010 trading during non-U.S. hours: 13% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 9% from 13% which gives subtract(13%, 9%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(13%, 9%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(13%, 9%), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 312012 what was the percentage change in tax positions from 2011 and favorable or unfavorable? Context: balance at january 1 2010 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 25621 is -2059 ( 2059 ) ; balance at january 1 2010 the balance at december 31 2011 of $ 25621 is $ 21579 ; ### Output: Logic: the change in tax position from year to year is the ( end balance less begin balance ) divide by the begin balance The required values from the context for the question are: (Note: The information needed to answer the question seems incomplete, but I've listed what's available.) Decreases in current period tax positions (2010): -2059 Balance at December 31, 2011: 21579 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 2059 by const_m1 which gives multiply(2059, const_m1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 21579 which gives divide(multiply(2059, const_m1), 21579) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(multiply(2059, const_m1), 21579), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(multiply(2059, const_m1), 21579), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: about how many more shares will the company still buy back in their repurchase plan if they paid $ 16.91 a share? Context: the december 1 - 31 of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 is 3323728 ; the december 1 - 31 of average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 is $ 17.07 ; the december 1 - 31 of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 is 3323728 ; the december 1 - 31 of maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3 is $ 118560581 ; repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . the total of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 is 11877706 ; the total of average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 is $ 16.91 ; the total of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 is 11876639 ; the total of maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3 is ; ### Output: Logic: the amount of money left over is given on the right side of the table . we take that amount of money and divide it by the share price in order to get the amount of shares that can be bought . The required values from the context for the question are: Maximum dollar value for shares that may yet be purchased: 118560581 Average price paid per share: 16.91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 118560581 by 16.91 which gives divide(118560581, 16.91), The final logic expression is divide(118560581, 16.91). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of shares purchased in november concerning the whole 2013 year? Context: period the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of average price paid per share is 98.18 ; the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is 664123417 ; period the total of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1994797 ; the total of average price paid per share is $ 100.56 ; the total of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 1994797 ; the total of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of shares purchased in november of 2013 divided by the total shares purchased in 2013 , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: November 2013 total number of shares purchased: 1191867 Total number of shares purchased for 2013: 1994797 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1191867 by 1994797 which gives divide(1191867, 1994797) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1191867, 1994797), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1191867, 1994797), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total net operating loss that must be utilized before expiration between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2033? Context: net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries totaling $ 12.4 million and u.s . net operating loss carryforwards previously acquired totaling $ 19.8 million at may 31 , 2015 will expire between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2033 if not utilized . capital loss carryforwards of u.s . ### Output: Logic: to calculate the total net operating loss that must be utilized , one must add the foreign subsidiaries net operating loss with the u.s . net operating loss . The required values from the context for the question are: Net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries: $12.4 million U.S. net operating loss carryforwards: $19.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 19.8 to 12.4 which gives add(19.8, 12.4), The final logic expression is add(19.8, 12.4). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the foreign exchange contracts , what is the difference between its average during 2008 and 2009? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 28.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 14.2 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 average is $ 21.6 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 18.8 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 5.3 ; the foreign exchange contracts of average is $ 11.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between these values.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Foreign exchange contracts average for June 30, 2009: $21.6 million Foreign exchange contracts average (seemingly another for 2009): $11.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 11.3 from 21.6 which gives subtract(21.6, 11.3), The final logic expression is subtract(21.6, 11.3). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the amortized cost of contracts due in one year or less among the total? Context: ( millions ) the due in one year or less of amortizedcost is $ 50 ; the due in one year or less of fairvalue is $ 50 ; ( millions ) the total fixed maturities of amortizedcost is $ 150 ; the total fixed maturities of fairvalue is $ 150 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of those contracts divided by the total , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Amortized cost of contracts due in one year or less: $50 million Total fixed maturities of amortized cost: $150 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 50 by 150 which gives divide(50, 150) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(50, 150), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(50, 150), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in the dividend yield from 2009 to 2010 Context: the dividend yield of 2010 is 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2009 is 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference between the current and most recent divided by the most recent The required values from the context for the question are: Dividend yield for 2010: 2.9% Dividend yield for 2009: 3.6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3.6 from 2.9 which gives subtract(2.9, 3.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3.6 which gives divide(subtract(2.9, 3.6), 3.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2.9, 3.6), 3.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2.9, 3.6), 3.6), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the eog's roll forward of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets during 2015-2017 , what was the lowest value registered in the beginning balance? Context: the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 383221 ; the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 506127 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 463018 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value of this period . The required values from the context for the question are: Beginning balance for 2017: $383221 Beginning balance for 2016: $506127 Beginning balance for 2015: $463018 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(beginning balance, none). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in the total restricted cash and marketable securities from 2011 to 2012 Context: the total restricted cash and marketable securities of 2012 is $ 164.2 ; the total restricted cash and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 189.6 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period The required values from the context for the question are: Total restricted cash and marketable securities for 2012: $164.2 million Total restricted cash and marketable securities for 2011: $189.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 189.6 from 164.2 which gives subtract(164.2, 189.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 189.6 which gives divide(subtract(164.2, 189.6), 189.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(164.2, 189.6), 189.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(164.2, 189.6), 189.6), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization between 2017 and 2018? Context: the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2018 is -31674085 ( 31674085 ) ; the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2017 is -29191247 ( 29191247 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of these years . The required values from the context for the question are: Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2018: -31674085 Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2017: -29191247 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 29191247 from 31674085 which gives subtract(31674085, 29191247), The final logic expression is subtract(31674085, 29191247). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percent did the income tax benefit increase from 2014 to 2016? Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2016 is $ 30809 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 21056 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 is $ 29793 ; the income tax benefit of 2016 is $ 9879 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 6907 ; the income tax benefit of 2014 is $ 7126 ; the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . ### Output: Logic: the tax benefit increased 38.6% , one can find this by subtracting 2016 by 2014 tax benefits . then taking the answer and dividing it by 2014 tax benefits . The required values from the context for the question are: Income tax benefit for 2016: $9879 Income tax benefit for 2014: $7126 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7126 from 9879 which gives subtract(9879, 7126) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7126 which gives divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the service revenue as of december 312016 in millions as filed? Context: ( in millions ) the net income of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 1460 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 as adjusted is 1460 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 733 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014 ; the net income of as adjusted is 733 ; ( in millions ) the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014% ( 2014 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 as adjusted is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 3% ( 3 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014% ( 2014 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of as adjusted is 3% ( 3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the service revenue was derived based on the net income and net income as a percent of service revenue provided The required values from the context for the question are: Net income of year ended December 31, 2016 as filed: 1460 (in millions) Net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended December 31, 2016 as filed: 5% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1460 by 5% which gives divide(1460, 5%), The final logic expression is divide(1460, 5%). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase percentage of trading during the us hours between 2008 and 2009? Context: the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2010 is 13% ( 13 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2009 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2008 is 11% ( 11 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the variation of the total percentage of trading hours ( 100% ) and the trading in non us hours ( 9% ) in 2009 and the variation of the total percentage of trading hours ( 100% ) and the trading in non us hours ( 11% ) in 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: non-u.s. hours 2009: 9% non-u.s. hours 2008: 11% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 11 from const_100 which gives subtract(const_100, 11) step 2: subtract 9 from const_100 which gives subtract(const_100, 9) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(const_100, 9), subtract(const_100, 11)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(const_100, 9), subtract(const_100, 11)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(const_100, 9), subtract(const_100, 11)), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the ratio of the expected benefit payments for 2009 to 2010 Context: 2009 the 2010 of $ 19766 is 18182 ; ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the expected benefit payments in 2009 to 2010 was 1.087 The required values from the context for the question are: 2010: $ 19766 2009: $ 18182 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 19766 by 18182 which gives divide(19766, 18182), The final logic expression is divide(19766, 18182). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for the year ended december 31 2008 what was the net profit margin Context: the revenue of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is $ 9362.2 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is 285.7 ; ### Output: Logic: net profit margin is the ratio of the net income to the revenues The required values from the context for the question are: revenue 2008: $ 9362.2 net income 2008: $ 285.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 285.7 by 9362.2 which gives divide(285.7, 9362.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of future annual commitments related to minimum quantities of purchased water having non-cancelable are due in 2020? Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 65 ; the 2020 of amount is 65 ; the 2021 of amount is 65 ; the 2022 of amount is 64 ; the 2023 of amount is 57 ; the thereafter of amount is 641 ; ### Output: Logic: from here you need to take the amount due in 2020 , or 65 , and divide by the total or $ 957 to get 6.8% The required values from the context for the question are: 2020 amount: $ 65 total amount: $ 957 (from all provided years) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 65 to 65 which gives add(65, 65) step 2: add 65 to 64 which gives add(65, 64) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)) step 4: add 57 to 641 which gives add(57, 641) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase of the expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans in 2011 compared with 2010 , in millions? Context: ( in millions ) the 2011 of year is $ 7.2 ; aggregate expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans amounted to $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 5.8 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: its the variation between the total amount of expenses with saving plans in 2010 ( $ 6.3 millions ) and 2011 ( $ 7.2 millions ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2011 expense: $ 7.2 million 2010 expense: $ 6.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6.3 from 7.2 which gives subtract(7.2, 6.3), The final logic expression is subtract(7.2, 6.3). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the total incentive compensation from 2017 to 2018 Context: in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 2021 ; the total of 2017 is $ 2251 ; the total of 2016 is $ 2183 ; ### Output: Logic: the total incentive compensation declined by 10.3% from 2017 to 2018 The required values from the context for the question are: total 2018: $ 2021 total 2017: $ 2251 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2251 from 2021 which gives subtract(2021, 2251) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2251 which gives divide(subtract(2021, 2251), 2251) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2021, 2251), 2251), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2021, 2251), 2251), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the reserves for environmental matters during 2016 and 2017? Context: as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company has recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value of reserves ( $ 28.9 ) minus the initial one ( $ 30.6 ) , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage to represent the decrease . The required values from the context for the question are: reserves 2017: $ 28.9 million reserves 2016: $ 30.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 30.6 from 28.9 which gives subtract(28.9, 30.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 30.6 which gives divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6), const_100), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the change in the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted from 2016 to 2017 Context: incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted increased by 15.5% from 2016 to 2017 The required values from the context for the question are: fair value 2017: $ 84.53 fair value 2016: $ 73.20 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 73.20 from 84.53 which gives subtract(84.53, 73.20) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 73.20 which gives divide(subtract(84.53, 73.20), 73.20) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(84.53, 73.20), 73.20), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(84.53, 73.20), 73.20), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total value of assets , in thousands? Context: the cash and cash equivalents of ( in thousands ) is $ 92116 ; the premiums receivable and other current assets of ( in thousands ) is 6510 ; the property and equipment and other assets of ( in thousands ) is 21315 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all assets . The required values from the context for the question are: cash and cash equivalents: $ 92116 (in thousands) premiums receivable and other current assets: $ 6510 (in thousands) property and equipment and other assets: $ 21315 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6510 to 92116 which gives add(6510, 92116) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 21315 which gives add(add(6510, 92116), 21315), The final logic expression is add(add(6510, 92116), 21315). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average expense for the significant plans in the u.s.? Context: years ended december 31 the u.s . of 2018 is $ 98 ; the u.s . of 2017 is $ 105 ; the u.s . of 2016 is $ 121 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all expenses for the significant plans divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: U.S. 2018: $ 98 U.S. 2017: $ 105 U.S. 2016: $ 121 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(u.s ., none). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the debt to asset ratio? Context: the total assets acquired of amount ( in millions ) is 1020 ; the total liabilities assumed of amount ( in millions ) is 684 ; ### Output: Logic: debt to asset ratio = total liabilities/total assets The required values from the context for the question are: Total assets: 1020 (in millions) Total liabilities: 684 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 684 by 1020 which gives divide(684, 1020), The final logic expression is divide(684, 1020). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage growth of the vornado realty trust from 2005 to 2006 Context: the vornado realty trust of 2005 is 100 ; the vornado realty trust of 2006 is 151 ; the vornado realty trust of 2007 is 113 ; the vornado realty trust of 2008 is 81 ; the vornado realty trust of 2009 is 100 ; the vornado realty trust of 2010 is 124 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage growth is the growth amount divided by the base amount The required values from the context for the question are: Vornado Realty Trust 2005: 100 Vornado Realty Trust 2006: 151 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 151 which gives subtract(151, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(151, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(151, 100), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated value , in dollars , of the total number of shares purchased between 9/30/07 and 10/26/07? Context: period the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 2972951 ; the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( b ) average price paid per share ( 1 ) ( 3 ) is $ 18.84 ; the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 ) is 2964225 ; the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 ) is $ 4267375081 ; ### Output: Logic: estimated amount since price per share is average The required values from the context for the question are: Total number of shares purchased (9/30/07 to 10/26/07): 2972951 Average price paid per share (9/30/07 to 10/26/07): $18.84 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 18.84 by 2972951 which gives multiply(18.84, 2972951), The final logic expression is multiply(18.84, 2972951). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what did the make-whole settlements increase the total repurchase liability at the end of the period in 2012 Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the repurchase liability at end of period of 2014 is $ 275 ; the repurchase liability at end of period of 2013 is $ 681 ; the repurchase liability at end of period of 2012 is $ 2811 ; ( b ) presented net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans , 201cmake-whole 201d settlements , settlements with claimants , and certain related expense . make-whole settlements were $ 11 million , $ 414 million and $ 524 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ( c ) included a provision related to new loan sales of $ 4 million , $ 20 million and $ 112 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans would increase the total amount of money . The required values from the context for the question are: Repurchase liability at end of period 2012: $2811 (in millions) Make-whole settlements 2012: $524 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2811 to 524 which gives add(2811, 524), The final logic expression is add(2811, 524). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the estimated future pension benefit payments increase from 2011 to 2012 Context: 2009 the 2011 of $ 14.9 is 16.2 ; 2009 the 2012 of $ 14.9 is 19.2 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference show above divide by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: 2011 benefit payments: $16.2 2012 benefit payments: $19.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 16.2 from 19.2 which gives subtract(19.2, 16.2) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 16.2 which gives divide(subtract(19.2, 16.2), 16.2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(19.2, 16.2), 16.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(19.2, 16.2), 16.2), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change in the allowance in doubtful accounts in 2009 Context: the provision of 2010 is 38 ; the provision of 2009 is 54 ; the provision of 2008 is 65 ; the amounts written off of 2010 is -13 ( 13 ) ; the amounts written off of 2009 is -27 ( 27 ) ; the amounts written off of 2008 is -18 ( 18 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net change for the period is the increase plus the decrease The required values from the context for the question are: Provision for 2009: 54 Amounts written off for 2009: -27 (27) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 54 to -27 which gives add(54, -27), The final logic expression is add(54, -27). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the equity income in drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco from 2007 to 2007 for schlumberger Context: schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from one period to the next divided by the original period The required values from the context for the question are: Equity income 2007: $178 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 178 from 210 which gives subtract(210, 178) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 178 which gives divide(subtract(210, 178), 178), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(210, 178), 178). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the low and average foreign exchange contracts , in millions of dollars? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 high is $ 27.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 low is $ 7.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 average is $ 18.9 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: High foreign exchange contracts 2014: $27.4 (in millions) Low foreign exchange contracts 2014: $7.4 (in millions) Average foreign exchange contracts 2014: $18.9 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7.4 from 18.9 which gives subtract(18.9, 7.4), The final logic expression is subtract(18.9, 7.4). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the asr agreement , what will be the total value associated with the repurchase program of common stock , in millions of dollars? Context: on february 19 , 2019 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( 201casr 201d ) agreement with jpmorgan chase bank to repurchase $ 700 of its common stock , pursuant to the share repurchase program previously authorized by the board . under the asr agreement , arconic will receive initial delivery of approximately 32 million shares on february 21 , 2019 . ### Output: Logic: it is the price per repurchased share multiplied by the total amount of shares delivered . The required values from the context for the question are: Amount for repurchase under ASR agreement: $700 (of common stock) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 700 by 32 which gives multiply(700, 32), The final logic expression is multiply(700, 32). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31 , 2009 , what was the percent unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken by allied prior to the merger . Context: as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 211.9 million of the $ 242.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken by allied prior to the merger . ### Output: Logic: the percent is the difference in the amounts divide by the earliest amount The required values from the context for the question are: Unrecognized tax benefits related to Allied pre-merger: $211.9 million Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009: $242.2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 211.9 by 242.2 which gives divide(211.9, 242.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(211.9, 242.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(211.9, 242.2), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total research and development from december 312017 to 2015 in millions Context: research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the total amount is the sum of all amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Research and development expense 2017: $72 million Research and development expense 2016: $78 million Research and development expense 2015: $119 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 72 to 78 which gives add(72, 78) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 119 which gives add(add(72, 78), 119), The final logic expression is add(add(72, 78), 119). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how many years does the irs have under examination? Context: the of 2011 is 2011 ; the of 2010 is 2010 ; the of 2009 is 2009 ; the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . ### Output: Logic: 2006 is the last closed year . The required values from the context for the question are: IRS examination years: 2004, 2005, 2006 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2006 from 2009 which gives subtract(2009, 2006), The final logic expression is subtract(2009, 2006). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total amount of unvested shares gifted by the company during the three year period? Context: the unvested at may 31 2013 of shares is 1096 ; the unvested at may 31 2013 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 44 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of shares is 877 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 45 ; the unvested at may 31 2015 of shares is 924 ; the unvested at may 31 2015 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 58 ; the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2015 and 2014 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report 2013 81 . ### Output: Logic: to find out the total amount of unvested shares the company one must added up the shares given by the company over the course of the three years . The required values from the context for the question are: Unvested shares on May 31, 2013: 1096 Unvested shares on May 31, 2014: 877 Unvested shares on May 31, 2015: 924 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1096 to 877 which gives add(1096, 877) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 924 which gives add(add(1096, 877), 924), The final logic expression is add(add(1096, 877), 924). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012-2013 , what is the increase observed in the special terminations settlements and curtailments? Context: the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2013 is 19.8 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2012 is 8.2 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2011 is 1.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2013 value divided by the 2012's , then turned into a percentage and subtracted 100% . The required values from the context for the question are: Special terminations settlements and curtailments in 2013: 19.8 Special terminations settlements and curtailments in 2012: 8.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 19.8 by 8.2 which gives divide(19.8, 8.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100) step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100), const_100), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total income tax benefit that came from buying back their common stock from 2013 to 2015? Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2015 is $ 21.1 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ 29.8 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2013 is $ 18.4 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 is $ -6.9 ( 6.9 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ -7.1 ( 7.1 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2013 is $ -5.6 ( 5.6 ) ; 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . ### Output: Logic: to calculate the income tax benefit one would need to add up the income tax benefit for the years of 2013 , 2014 , and 2015 . The required values from the context for the question are: Income tax benefit in 2015: -6.9 Income tax benefit in 2014: -7.1 Income tax benefit in 2013: -5.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6.9 to 7.1 which gives add(6.9, 7.1) step 2: add 5.6 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)), The final logic expression is add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much higher are the returns of the s&p 500 in the same period ( 2008-2013 ) ? as a percentage . Context: the state street corporation of 2008 is $ 100 ; the state street corporation of 2009 is $ 111 ; the state street corporation of 2010 is $ 118 ; the state street corporation of 2011 is $ 105 ; the state street corporation of 2012 is $ 125 ; the state street corporation of 2013 is $ 198 ; the s&p 500 index of 2008 is 100 ; the s&p 500 index of 2009 is 126 ; the s&p 500 index of 2010 is 146 ; the s&p 500 index of 2011 is 149 ; the s&p 500 index of 2012 is 172 ; the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 228 ; the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . ### Output: Logic: used result from question 1 The required values from the context for the question are: S&P 500 index in 2008: 100 S&P 500 index in 2013: 228 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 228 by 100 which gives divide(228, 100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives divide(divide(228, 100), 100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(divide(228, 100), 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(divide(228, 100), 100), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of non-same store revenue among the total revenue in 2014? Context: the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2014 is 493349 ; the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2013 is 151185 ; the non-same store and other of increase is 342164 ; the non-same store and other of percentage increase is 226.3% ( 226.3 % ) ; the total of year ended december 31 2014 is $ 992178 ; the total of year ended december 31 2013 is $ 634843 ; the total of increase is $ 357335 ; the total of percentage increase is 56.3% ( 56.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the revenue of the non-same store divided by the total revenue , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Non-same store revenue in 2014: 493349 Total revenue in 2014: 992178 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 493349 by 992178 which gives divide(493349, 992178) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(493349, 992178), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(493349, 992178), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth in the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations from 2017 to 2018 Context: the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations of 2018 is $ 349.4 ; the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations of 2017 is $ 324.8 ; the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations of 2016 is $ 324.1 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth is based on the subtraction of the current from the prior period amount divide by the prior period The required values from the context for the question are: Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018: 349.4 Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2017: 324.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 324.8 from 349.4 which gives subtract(349.4, 324.8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 324.8 which gives divide(subtract(349.4, 324.8), 324.8) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(349.4, 324.8), 324.8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(349.4, 324.8), 324.8), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 , how much was lost due to the decrease in net income? Context: operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . ### Output: Logic: to figure out the decrease in net income , one must take total change without net income and subtract it by the change between the years . this should give you $ 47.9 million . The required values from the context for the question are: Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013: 592.9 Increase from 2012: 235.7 Improvement in working capital usage: 283.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 235.7 from 283.6 which gives subtract(283.6, 235.7), The final logic expression is subtract(283.6, 235.7). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the lease expenses after 2021 as a part of the total amount Context: 2016 the 2021 and thereafter of $ 2266 is 7844 ; 2016 the total of $ 2266 is $ 20807 ; ### Output: Logic: to find the percent , divide the amount by the total The required values from the context for the question are: Lease expenses after 2021: 7844 Total amount in 2016: 20807 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 7844 by 20807 which gives divide(7844, 20807) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(7844, 20807), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(7844, 20807), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations are long-term debt obligations? Context: ( in millions ) the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is $ 4033 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006 is $ 119 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is $ 1222 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is $ 200 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is $ 2 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is $ 529 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is $ 1961 ; ( in millions ) the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is $ 6175 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006 is $ 975 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is $ 1440 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is $ 337 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is $ 113 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is $ 615 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is $ 2695 ; debt obligations : at december 31 , 2005 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.0 billion , as compared to $ 5.0 billion at december 31 , 2004 . ### Output: Logic: to figure out this percentage you need to divide long term debt obligations by total contractual obligations . The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt obligations total: 4033 Total contractual obligations total: 6175 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4033 by 6175 which gives divide(4033, 6175) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4033, 6175), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4033, 6175), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the expected increase in the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 , in comparison with 2019? Context: in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 divided by the 2019's , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Amortization of actuarial losses in 2020: 105 Amortization of actuarial losses in 2019: 76.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 105 by 76.2 which gives divide(105, 76.2) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(105, 76.2), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(105, 76.2), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(105, 76.2), const_1), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total income tax benefit that came from buying back their common stock from 2013 to 2015? Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2015 is $ 21.1 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ 29.8 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2013 is $ 18.4 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 is $ -6.9 ( 6.9 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ -7.1 ( 7.1 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2013 is $ -5.6 ( 5.6 ) ; 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . ### Output: Logic: to calculate the income tax benefit one would need to add up the income tax benefit for the years of 2013 , 2014 , and 2015 . The required values from the context for the question are: Income tax benefit 2015: $-6.9 Income tax benefit 2014: $-7.1 Income tax benefit 2013: $-5.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6.9 to 7.1 which gives add(6.9, 7.1) step 2: add 5.6 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)), The final logic expression is add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the sales during 2013 and 2014? Context: the sales of 2014 is $ 8.5 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 52.3 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 258.0 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual variation observed , which is calculated using the initial value ( 52.3 ) and the final value ( 8.5 ) then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Sales 2014: $8.5 Sales 2013: $52.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 52.3 from 8.5 which gives subtract(8.5, 52.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 52.3 which gives divide(subtract(8.5, 52.3), 52.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(8.5, 52.3), 52.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(8.5, 52.3), 52.3), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percent did the investor make on applied materials from the first 5 years compared to the 2016 to 2017 time period ? ( not including compound interest ) Context: the applied materials of 10/28/2012 is 100.00 ; the applied materials of 10/27/2013 is 171.03 ; the applied materials of 10/26/2014 is 207.01 ; the applied materials of 10/25/2015 is 165.34 ; the applied materials of 10/30/2016 is 293.64 ; the applied materials of 10/29/2017 is 586.91 ; applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . ### Output: Logic: to see the difference between the years one will need to calculate the total percentage change over those years . for the first 5 years its pretty easy because we started with $ 100 making it a 193% return . for the years 2016 to 2017 , one needs to subtract the starting price by the ending price and then divide that number by the starting price . this gives us a 99.9% return in 2016 to 2017 . The required values from the context for the question are: Applied materials 10/28/2012: 100.00 Applied materials 10/30/2016: 293.64 Applied materials 10/29/2017: 586.91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 293.64 from 586.91 which gives subtract(586.91, 293.64) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 293.64 which gives divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64) step 3: subtract const_100 from 293.64 which gives subtract(293.64, const_100) step 4: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent growth or decline of research & engineering as a percent of revenue from 2010 to 2011 Context: the research & engineering of 2011 is 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) ; the research & engineering of 2010 is 3.3% ( 3.3 % ) ; the research & engineering of 2009 is 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the difference in amounts from one period to another divided by the initial period The required values from the context for the question are: Research & Engineering 2011: 2.7% Research & Engineering 2010: 3.3% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3.3 from 2.7 which gives subtract(2.7, 3.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3.3 which gives divide(subtract(2.7, 3.3), 3.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2.7, 3.3), 3.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2.7, 3.3), 3.3), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of reit index as of 12/31/2003 Context: the all reit index of 12/31/2002 is $ 100 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2003 is $ 138 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2004 is $ 181 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2005 is $ 196 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2006 is $ 262 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2007 is $ 215 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from year to year divided by the original year amount The required values from the context for the question are: All REIT index 12/31/2002: $100 All REIT index 12/31/2003: $138 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 138 which gives subtract(138, const_100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(138, const_100), const_100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(138, const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(138, const_100), const_100), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the unconditional purchase obligations during 2016 and 2017? Context: 2016 the 2017 of $ 917 is 117 ; unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual variation observed during these years , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value ( 2016 ) of the final one ( 2017 ) then dividing by the initial and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 amount: $917 2017 amount: 117 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 917 from 117 which gives subtract(117, 917) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 917 which gives divide(subtract(117, 917), 917) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(117, 917), 917), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(117, 917), 917), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the operating income in 2014 Context: the operating revenues of 2014 is $ 13 ; the operating revenues of 2013 is $ 23 ; the total operating expenses net of 2014 is 19 ; the total operating expenses net of 2013 is 26 ; ### Output: Logic: the operating income is the operating revenues less operating expenses The required values from the context for the question are: Operating revenues 2014: $13 Total operating expenses 2014: 19 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 19 from 13 which gives subtract(13, 19), The final logic expression is subtract(13, 19). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is payable after 2022? Context: the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ; the 2019 of amount is 14 ; the 2020 of amount is 12 ; the 2021 of amount is 9 ; the 2022 of amount is 8 ; the thereafter of amount is 65 ; ### Output: Logic: from here you need to than divide the amount to be paid after 2022 or 65 by the total or 123 ( 65/123 ) to get 52.8% The required values from the context for the question are: Amount payable after 2022: 65 Total amounts (2018-2022 and thereafter): 15+14+12+9+8+65 = 123 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 15 to 14 which gives add(15, 14) step 2: add 12 to 9 which gives add(12, 9) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)) step 4: add 8 to 65 which gives add(8, 65) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net effect of the one percentage point change on the other post retirement benefit obligations combined Context: the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-point increase is $ 105967 ; the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-point decrease is $ -86179 ( 86179 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net effect on the other post retirement benefits is the sum of the decrease and increase The required values from the context for the question are: Effect of one-percentage-point increase: $105967 Effect of one-percentage-point decrease: $-86179 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 105967 to -86179 which gives add(105967, -86179), The final logic expression is add(105967, -86179). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the company's net valuation allowance at the end of 2013? Context: balance at january 1 2011 the balance at december 31 2013 of $ 23788 is $ 13555 ; included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . ### Output: Logic: in order to get the net valuation allowance you need to take out any special one time non-recurring revenues or expenses . since the discrete tax benefit is already included in the ending 2013 balance , you need to take it out to get to the net number The required values from the context for the question are: Balance at December 31, 2013: $23788 Discrete tax benefit: $2979 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2979 from 13555 which gives subtract(13555, 2979), The final logic expression is subtract(13555, 2979). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the fourth quarter , what is the variation between the low trading stock prices during 2014 and 2015? Context: quarter the fourth of 2015 high is 11.18 ; the fourth of 2015 low is 7.81 ; the fourth of 2015 dividend is 0.03 ; the fourth of 2015 high is 17.75 ; the fourth of 2015 low is 13.71 ; the fourth of dividend is 0.03 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those two prices during 2015 and 2014 . The required values from the context for the question are: the fourth of 2015 low: 7.81 the fourth of 2015 low: 13.71 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7.81 from 13.71 which gives subtract(13.71, 7.81), The final logic expression is subtract(13.71, 7.81). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2017-2018 , what is the decrease observed in the weighted-average number of diluted shares? Context: in millions the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018 is 95.7 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017 is 96.0 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2016 is 96.9 ; the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value ( 95.7 ) minus the initial value ( 96 ) , then divided by the initial one and turned into a percentage to represent the decrease . The required values from the context for the question are: the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018: 95.7 the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017: 96.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 96.0 from 95.7 which gives subtract(95.7, 96.0) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 96.0 which gives divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0), const_100), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of the balance was used on payments . Context: balance at may 31 2012 the payments of $ 67436 is -35655 ( 35655 ) ; the following table reflects the activity in our accrual for fraud losses , fines and other charges for the twelve months ended may 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) : . ### Output: Logic: to figure out the percentage payments are , one must divide payments by the balance . The required values from the context for the question are: payments: 67436 balance at may 31 2012: -35655 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 35655 by 67436 which gives divide(35655, 67436) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(35655, 67436), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(35655, 67436), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012 and 2013 , what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year? Context: unrecognized tax benefits the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 124.3 ; the balance at end of year of 2012 is $ 110.8 ; the balance at end of year of 2011 is $ 126.4 ; ### Output: Logic: is the balance of 2013 divided by the 2012's then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: balance at end of year of 2013: $ 124.3 balance at end of year of 2012: $ 110.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 124.3 by 110.8 which gives divide(124.3, 110.8) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), const_1), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the change in annual rental expenses from 2015 to 2016 in dollars Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 . year the 2016 of amount is $ 13 ; ### Output: Logic: the change from one period to another is the difference between the 2 periods The required values from the context for the question are: rental expenses under operating leases for 2015: $ 21 year the 2016 of amount: $ 13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 13 from 21 which gives subtract(21, 13), The final logic expression is subtract(21, 13). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest income from performance plans? Context: years ended december 31 the performance plans of 2009 is 60 ; the performance plans of 2008 is 67 ; the performance plans of 2007 is 54 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value . The required values from the context for the question are: performance plans of 2009: 60 performance plans of 2008: 67 performance plans of 2007: 54 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(performance plans, none). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent change in free cash flow from 2015 to 2016 Context: the free cash flow of 2017 is $ 927.0 ; the free cash flow of 2016 is $ 929.8 ; the free cash flow of 2015 is $ 755.3 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is equal to the difference in the amounts based on the recent and earliest divide by the earliest The required values from the context for the question are: free cash flow of 2016: $ 929.8 free cash flow of 2015: $ 755.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 755.3 from 929.8 which gives subtract(929.8, 755.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 755.3 which gives divide(subtract(929.8, 755.3), 755.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(929.8, 755.3), 755.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(929.8, 755.3), 755.3), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the weighted average fair value of options , what was the decrease between shares that vested in 2006 and 2005? Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006 is $ 20.01 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2005 is $ 9.48 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2004 is $ 7.28 ; the total fair value of shares vested during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 was $ 9413 , $ 8249 , and $ 6418 respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the total fair value of options that vested in 2005 divided by its weighted average fair value also in 2005 minus the total fair value of options that vested in 2006 divided by its weighted average fair value in 2006 . The required values from the context for the question are: weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006: $ 20.01 weighted average fair value of options granted of 2005: $ 9.48 total fair value of shares vested during 2006: $ 9413 total fair value of shares vested during 2005: $ 8249 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 9413 by 20.01 which gives divide(9413, 20.01) step 2: divide 8249 by 9.48 which gives divide(8249, 9.48) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(8249, 9.48), divide(9413, 20.01)), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(8249, 9.48), divide(9413, 20.01)). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the short-term debt as a percent of long-term debt , in 2019? Context: 30 september the short-term borrowings of 2019 is $ 58.2 ; the short-term borrowings of 2018 is $ 54.3 ; 30 september the long-term debt of 2019 is 2907.3 ; the long-term debt of 2018 is 2967.4 ; 30 september the long-term debt 2013 related party ( b ) of 2019 is 320.1 ; the long-term debt 2013 related party ( b ) of 2018 is 384.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the short-term debt divided by the long-term debt ( the sum of both long-term debts ) , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: short-term borrowings of 2019: $ 58.2 long-term debt of 2019: 2907.3 long-term debt 2013 related party (b) of 2019: 320.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2907.3 to 320.1 which gives add(2907.3, 320.1) step 2: divide 58.2 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(58.2, add(2907.3, 320.1)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(58.2, add(2907.3, 320.1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(58.2, add(2907.3, 320.1)), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in the cash provided by operating activities from 2007 to 2008 Context: the cash provided by operating activities of 2009 is $ 1396.5 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2008 is $ 512.2 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2007 is $ 661.3 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage decline is the difference between the most current and prior amount divide by the prior amount The required values from the context for the question are: cash provided by operating activities of 2008: $ 512.2 cash provided by operating activities of 2007: $ 661.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 661.3 from 512.2 which gives subtract(512.2, 661.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 661.3 which gives divide(subtract(512.2, 661.3), 661.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(512.2, 661.3), 661.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(512.2, 661.3), 661.3), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2013 charge , what is the impact of the merchant gases segment on the total charge? Context: the 2013 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 71.9 ; the 2013 charge of asset actions is $ 100.4 ; the 2013 charge of contract actions/ other is $ 59.3 ; the 2013 charge of total is $ 231.6 ; the 2013 charges relate to the businesses at the segment level as follows : $ 61.0 in merchant gases , $ 28.6 in tonnage gases , $ 141.0 in electronics and performance materials , and $ 1.0 in equipment and energy . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the merchant gases segment divided by the total charge , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2013 charge of total: $ 231.6 2013 charges merchant gases: $ 61.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 61.0 by 231.6 which gives divide(61.0, 231.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(61.0, 231.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(61.0, 231.6), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the affect of the change in accounting principles on other intangible assets net in millions? Context: consolidated balance sheet the other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as reported is $ 57.2 ; the other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as adjusted is $ 33.5 ; ### Output: Logic: size of the write down due to change The required values from the context for the question are: other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as reported: $ 57.2 other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as adjusted: $ 33.5 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 57.2 from 33.5 which gives subtract(33.5, 57.2), The final logic expression is subtract(33.5, 57.2). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2020-2021 , what is the difference between the growth of the projected benefit payments in the u.s . and international? Context: the 2020 of u.s . is 152.4 ; the 2020 of international is 53.9 ; the 2021 of u.s . is 157.0 ; the 2021 of international is 55.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between the percentual increase of each estimated benefit payment . The required values from the context for the question are: 2020 of U.S.: 152.4 2020 of international: 53.9 2021 of U.S.: 157.0 2021 of international: 55.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 157.0 by 152.4 which gives divide(157.0, 152.4) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1) step 3: divide 55.6 by 53.9 which gives divide(55.6, 53.9) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1), subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1), subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1), subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1)), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the number of dollars obtained with the sale of primary aluminum in 2015? Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5591 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 6800 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 6596 ; the sale of primary aluminum represents approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of this segment 2019s third-party sales . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of third-party sales multiplied by 90% . The required values from the context for the question are: Third-party sales of 2015: $5591 Percentage of primary aluminum sales: 90% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 90% by 5591 which gives multiply(90%, 5591), The final logic expression is multiply(90%, 5591). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the additional discrete income tax charge for valuation allowances in 2015 , what is the percentage of the valuation allowance of the deferred tax assets recorded in iceland? Context: in 2015 , alcoa recognized an additional $ 141 discrete income tax charge for valuation allowances on certain deferred tax assets in iceland and suriname . the remaining $ 56 charge relates to a valuation allowance established on a portion of the deferred tax assets recorded in iceland . ### Output: Logic: it is iceland's valuation allowance of the deferred tax assets divided by the total additional discrete income tax charge for valuation allowances , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 additional discrete income tax charge: $141 Valuation allowance in Iceland: $56 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 56 by 141 which gives divide(56, 141) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(56, 141), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(56, 141), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 2007 what was the approximate total of the total commercial medical membership Context: to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . the total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership is 564700 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2886900 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3451600 ; these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . ### Output: Logic: as of december 2007 the approximate total of the total commercial medical membership was 3443292.68 The required values from the context for the question are: Total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership: 564700 Total commercial medical of other commercial membership: 2886900 Total commercial medical of commercial medical membership: 3451600 Percentage of smart plans and other consumer membership to total commercial medical membership: 16.4% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 564700 by 16.4 which gives divide(564700, 16.4), The final logic expression is divide(564700, 16.4). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the netting adjustment of the additional collateral in 2009 , in millions of dollars? Context: at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the collateral received and delivered . The required values from the context for the question are: Collateral received in 2009: $16.9 billion Collateral delivered in 2009: $5.8 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5.8 from 16.9 which gives subtract(16.9, 5.8), The final logic expression is subtract(16.9, 5.8). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much has cash equivalents and marketable securities decreased from 2014 to 2016? Context: balance sheet data the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2016 is $ 1100.6 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2015 is $ 1509.7 ; management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014. . ### Output: Logic: to find the amount of cash equivalent and marketable securities in 2014 , one needs to add the amount that was given in line 1 by 2015 . then to find the percentage difference one will subtract 2014 by 2016 and then divide that solution by 2014 . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash equivalents and marketable securities 2016: $1100.6 Cash equivalents and marketable securities 2015: $1509.7 Decrease due to exchange rate changes in 2015: $156.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1509.7 to 156.1 which gives add(1509.7, 156.1) step 2: subtract 1100.6 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6) step 3: add 1509.7 to 156.1 which gives add(1509.7, 156.1) step 4: divide the expression of step 2 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6), add(1509.7, 156.1)), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6), add(1509.7, 156.1)). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the contract terms of 15 years , what will be the total expense with the depreciation of the merchant gases segment?\\n Context: the merchant gases of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 32 ; the merchant gases of increase life by 1 year is $ -24 ( 24 ) ; we have numerous long-term customer supply contracts , particularly in the gases on-site business within the tonnage gases segment . these contracts principally have initial contract terms of 15 to 20 years . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of years of the contract multiplied by the increased life by year . The required values from the context for the question are: Merchant gases decrease life by 1 year: $32 Merchant gases increase life by 1 year: $-24 Contract terms mentioned: 15 to 20 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 24 by 15 which gives multiply(24, 15), The final logic expression is multiply(24, 15). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the mainline operations full-time equivalent employees to the total number of full-time equivalent employees Context: the total of mainline operations is 98900 ; the total of wholly-owned regional carriers is 19600 ; the total of total is 118500 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is amount in question divided by the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: Mainline operations employees: 98900 Total full-time equivalent employees: 118500 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 98900 by 118500 which gives divide(98900, 118500) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(98900, 118500), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(98900, 118500), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth in allowance for other funds used during construction from 2013 to 2014 Context: the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2015 is $ 13 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2014 is $ 9 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2013 is $ 13 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the division of the change by the begin balance The required values from the context for the question are: Allowance for other funds used during construction 2015: $13 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2014: $9 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2013: $13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 13 from const_9 which gives subtract(const_9, 13) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_9 which gives divide(subtract(const_9, 13), const_9) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(const_9, 13), const_9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(const_9, 13), const_9), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the fair market value of plan assets of the benefit pension plans during 2014 and 2015? Context: the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2015 measurement date decreased to $ 3916.4 from $ 4114.6 at the end of fiscal year 2014 . ### Output: Logic: it is the final 2015 value subtracted by the initial 2014 value then divided by the initial value and turned into a percentage.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Fair market value of plan assets at the end of fiscal year 2015: $3916.4 Fair market value of plan assets at the end of fiscal year 2014: $4114.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4114.6 from 3916.4 which gives subtract(3916.4, 4114.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 4114.6 which gives divide(subtract(3916.4, 4114.6), 4114.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(3916.4, 4114.6), 4114.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(3916.4, 4114.6), 4114.6), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the combined amount of allowance for funds used in and funds borrowed in construction in 2016 Context: the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2017 is $ 19 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2016 is $ 15 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2015 is $ 13 ; ### Output: Logic: the combined amount of allowance of funds used and borrowed in any years is the sum of the separate amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Allowance for other funds used during construction 2017: $19 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2016: $15 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2015: $13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 15 to const_6 which gives add(15, const_6), The final logic expression is add(15, const_6). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the other commercial membership , what is the percentage of fully insured plans among the total commercial medical plans? Context: the fully insured of consumer-choice membership is 184000 ; the fully insured of other commercial membership is 1815800 ; the fully insured of commercial medical membership is 1999800 ; the total commercial medical of consumer-choice membership is 371100 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2799700 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3170800 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of members of the fully insured plans divided by the members of the total commercial medical plans . The required values from the context for the question are: fully insured of other commercial membership: 1815800 total commercial medical of other commercial membership: 2799700 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1815800 by 2799700 which gives divide(1815800, 2799700) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1815800, 2799700), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1815800, 2799700), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of structures and machinery/equipment in the global rolled products segment , in years? Context: the global rolled products of structures is 31 ; the global rolled products of machinery and equipment is 21 ; the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of years . The required values from the context for the question are: global rolled products of structures: 31 global rolled products of machinery and equipment: 21 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21 from 31 which gives subtract(31, 21), The final logic expression is subtract(31, 21). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase in expense related to office , warehouse space , and real estate during 2003 and 2004? Context: commitments and contingencies rental expense related to office , warehouse space and real estate amounted to $ 608 , $ 324 , and $ 281 for the years ended december 25 , 2004 , december 27 , 2003 , and december 28 , 2002 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those two values . The required values from the context for the question are: rental expense for 2003: 324 rental expense for 2004: 608 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 324 from 608 which gives subtract(608, 324), The final logic expression is subtract(608, 324). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average operating income? Context: years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2011 is 448 ; the operating income of 2010 is 234 ; the operating income of 2009 is 203 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all operating income divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: operating income of 2011: 448 operating income of 2010: 234 operating income of 2009: 203 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(operating income, none). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: taking the year 2015 , what is the increase to allowance as a percent of the balance at the end of the year? Context: december 31 , the increase to allowance of 2015 is 472 ; the increase to allowance of 2014 is 117 ; the increase to allowance of 2013 is 471 ; december 31 , the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 2037 ; the balance at end of year of 2014 is $ 1668 ; the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 1804 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the increase to allowance divided by the total balance at the end of the year . The required values from the context for the question are: increase to allowance of 2015: 472 balance at end of year of 2015: 2037 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 472 by 2037 which gives divide(472, 2037) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(472, 2037), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(472, 2037), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2022-2026 period , what is the annual projected benefit payment value? Context: 2017 the 2022 20132026 of $ 11.5 is 35.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all these years' projected benefit payments divided by five ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2022-2026 projected benefit payment: 11.5 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 35.3 by const_5 which gives divide(35.3, const_5), The final logic expression is divide(35.3, const_5). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the changes in eog's total proved undeveloped reserves during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , what is the average value of extensions and discoveries? Context: the extensions and discoveries of 2018 is 490725 ; the extensions and discoveries of 2017 is 237378 ; the extensions and discoveries of 2016 is 138101 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all extensions and discoveries' value divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: extensions and discoveries of 2018: 490725 extensions and discoveries of 2017: 237378 extensions and discoveries of 2016: 138101 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(extensions and discoveries, none). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the liabilities incurred during 2017 and 2018? Context: the liabilities incurred of 2018 is 79057 ; the liabilities incurred of 2017 is 54764 ; the liabilities settled ( 1 ) of 2018 is -70829 ( 70829 ) ; the liabilities settled ( 1 ) of 2017 is -61871 ( 61871 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the liabilities incurred in 2018 divided by the 2017's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: liabilities incurred of 2018: 79057 liabilities incurred of 2017: 54764 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 79057 by 54764 which gives divide(79057, 54764) step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(79057, 54764), 1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(79057, 54764), 1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(79057, 54764), 1), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2013 what was the percent of the net cash used for investing activities to the net cash provided by operating activities Context: ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 20776 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 18884 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 20963 ; ( in millions ) the net cash used for investing activities of 2013 is -18073 ( 18073 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2012 is -14060 ( 14060 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2011 is -10301 ( 10301 ) ; ### Output: Logic: in 2013 86.9% of the net cash provided by operating activities was used for investing activities The required values from the context for the question are: net cash provided by operating activities of 2013: 20776 net cash used for investing activities of 2013: 18073 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 18073 by 20776 which gives divide(18073, 20776) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(18073, 20776), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(18073, 20776), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the decline in the asset impairment loss for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 Context: the unaudited pro forma information presented has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations . certain of the legacy republic assets classified as held for sale were adjusted to their estimated fair values less costs to sell and resulted in the recognition of an asset impairment loss of $ 1.8 million and $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change in amount from 2008 to 2009 divide by 2008 The required values from the context for the question are: asset impairment loss of 2009: 1.8 asset impairment loss of 2008: 6.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6.1 from 1.8 which gives subtract(1.8, 6.1) step 2: subtract 6.1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(1.8, 6.1), 6.1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(1.8, 6.1), 6.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(1.8, 6.1), 6.1), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the growth in the stock total return performance for hum from 2013 to 2014 Context: the hum of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 152 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 214 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 267 ; the hum of 12/31/2016 is $ 307 ; the hum of 12/31/2017 is $ 377 ; ### Output: Logic: the stock total return performance for hum increased by 41% from 2013 to 2014 The required values from the context for the question are: stock total return performance of hum for 2013: 152 stock total return performance of hum for 2014: 214 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 152 from 214 which gives subtract(214, 152) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(214, 152), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(214, 152), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the weighted average grant date fair value , whats is the difference between how many actual shares vested during the year of 2010 and how many vested based on the average grant fair value? Context: the vested of number of shares is -34630 ( 34630 ) ; the vested of weighted average grant date fair value is 257 ; the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: its the total fair value of restricted stocks that vested in 2010 divided by the average grant fair value and compared with the actual number of vested shares . The required values from the context for the question are: Vested number of shares: -34630 Vested weighted average grant date fair value: 257 Total fair value of restricted stock for 2010: $10.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10.3 by const_1000000 which gives multiply(10.3, const_1000000) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 257 which gives divide(multiply(10.3, const_1000000), 257) step 3: subtract 34630 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(multiply(10.3, const_1000000), 257), 34630), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(multiply(10.3, const_1000000), 257), 34630). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2009 and 2010 , what is the difference between the growth of the benefit payments and the expected subsidy receipts? Context: the 2009 of benefit payments is $ 2641 ; the 2009 of expected subsidy receipts is $ 77 ; the 2009 of net benefit payments is $ 2564 ; the 2010 of benefit payments is 3139 ; the 2010 of expected subsidy receipts is 91 ; the 2010 of net benefit payments is 3048 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between each percentual growth . The required values from the context for the question are: 2009 benefit payments: $2641 2009 expected subsidy receipts: $77 2010 benefit payments: $3139 2010 expected subsidy receipts: $91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 91 by 77 which gives divide(91, 77) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1) step 3: divide 3139 by 2641 which gives divide(3139, 2641) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1), subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1), subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1), subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1)), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the increase observed in the liability for interest? Context: as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of 2009 divide by the 2008's , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Liability for interest 2009: $18 million Liability for interest 2008: $14 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 18 by 14 which gives divide(18, 14) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(18, 14), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(18, 14), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(18, 14), const_1), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average value of diluted earnings per share issuable under incentive stock plans? Context: in millions the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2018 is 0.7 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2017 is 0.9 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2016 is 1.1 ; the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all diluted earnings per shares issuable under incentive stock plans in these three years , then divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2018: 0.7 Shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2017: 0.9 Shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2016: 1.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(shares issuable under incentive stock plans, none). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the adjusted net income from discontinued operations during 2017 and 2018 , in millions? Context: ( 3 ) adjusted net income from discontinued operations excludes the gain on sale of discontinued operations of $ 82 million , $ 779 million , and $ 0 million for the years ended 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Gain on sale of discontinued operations 2018: $82 million Gain on sale of discontinued operations 2017: $779 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 82 from 779 which gives subtract(779, 82), The final logic expression is subtract(779, 82). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how big is south america compared to asia? Context: country the brazil of at december 31 2011 banks is 149 ; the brazil of at december 31 2011 governments is 3398 ; the brazil of at december 31 2011 other is 2165 ; the brazil of at december 31 2011 total is 5712 ; country the japan of at december 31 2011 banks is 23542 ; the japan of at december 31 2011 governments is 436 ; the japan of at december 31 2011 other is 2821 ; the japan of at december 31 2011 total is 26799 ; ### Output: Logic: brazil - south america , japan - asia The required values from the context for the question are: Brazil total 2011: 5712 Japan total 2011: 26799 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 5712 by 26799 which gives divide(5712, 26799) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(5712, 26799), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(5712, 26799), 100). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change number of units in 2009 in thousands Context: the granted of number of units ( in thousands ) is 420 ; the granted of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 38.16 ; the vested of number of units ( in thousands ) is -79 ( 79 ) ; the vested of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 21.30 ; the forfeited of number of units ( in thousands ) is -114 ( 114 ) ; the forfeited of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 17.28 ; ### Output: Logic: the change is the summation of all activity both the increase and decrease The required values from the context for the question are: Granted number of units 2009: 420 Vested number of units 2009: -79 Forfeited number of units 2009: -114 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 420 to -79 which gives add(420, -79) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to -114 which gives add(add(420, -79), -114), The final logic expression is add(add(420, -79), -114). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: about how many towers were leased or subleased in 2004? Context: as of december 31 , 2004 , 8816 of the sites on which our u.s . towers are located , or approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our u.s . portfolio , were leased , subleased or licensed , while 1796 or approximately 17% ( 17 % ) were owned in fee or through . ### Output: Logic: the total number of towers in the us are given in line 24 . to find the amount leased we multiple that by the percentage given in line 25 . The required values from the context for the question are: Sites on U.S. towers as of December 31, 2004: 8816 Percentage of leased U.S. towers 2004: 83% Owned U.S. towers 2004: 1796 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 8816 by 83% which gives multiply(8816, 83%), The final logic expression is multiply(8816, 83%). ### End

### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016 and 2017 , what is the average current portion? Context: the current portion of 2017 is $ 19259 ; the current portion of 2016 is $ 18516 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of both current portion's value divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: Current portion 2017: $19259 Current portion 2016: $18516 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(current portion, none). ### End