text
stringlengths 601
2.62k
|
|---|
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between firth rixson's goodwill and the rti's?
Context: in november 2014 , arconic acquired firth rixson ( see note f ) , and , as a result recognized $ 1801 in goodwill . in march and july 2015 , arconic acquired tital and rti , respectively , ( see note f ) and recognized $ 117 and $ 298 , respectively , in goodwill .
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between each company's goodwill .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill for Firth Rixson = $1801
Goodwill for Tital = $117
Goodwill for RTI = $298
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 298 from 1801 which gives subtract(1801, 298),
The final logic expression is subtract(1801, 298).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009?
Context: 2008 the 2009 of $ 317 is 275 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those values divided by the initial one , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Value for 2009 = $317
Value for 2008 = $275
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 317 from 275 which gives subtract(275, 317)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 317 which gives divide(subtract(275, 317), 317)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(275, 317), 317), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(275, 317), 317), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate of the grant date fair value of rsus vested from 2013 to 2014
Context: the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
### Output:
Logic: the change in grant date fair value of rsus vested from 2013 to 2014 was the ( 2014 amount less 2013 amount ) divide by 2013 amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
RSUs Vested 2015 = $12
RSUs Vested 2014 = $11
RSUs Vested 2013 = $9
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_9 from 11 which gives subtract(11, const_9)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_9 which gives divide(subtract(11, const_9), const_9)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(11, const_9), const_9), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(11, const_9), const_9), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between the average and the 2014's operating margin?
Context: years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the operating margin of 2014 is 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating Margin 2014 = 21.0%
Operating Margin 2013 = 19.8%
Operating Margin 2012 = 19.6%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract table_average(operating margin, none) from 21.0% which gives subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none))
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the value of the nonvested shares at december 31 2009
Context: the nonvested at december 31 2009 of number of units ( in thousands ) is 1415 ; the nonvested at december 31 2009 of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 25.24 ;
### Output:
Logic: the value is the product of the number of shares by the price
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of Units 2009 = 1415 thousand
Weighted Average Fair Value 2009 = $25.24
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1415 by 25.24 which gives multiply(1415, 25.24),
The final logic expression is multiply(1415, 25.24).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate on the amex airline index from 12/31/2013 to 12/31/2014
Context: the amex airline index of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2014 is 152 ; the s&p 500 of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is 114 ;
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the recent period less the prior period divided by the prior
The required values from the context for the question are:
AMEX Airline Index 12/9/2013 = 100
AMEX Airline Index 12/31/2013 = 102
AMEX Airline Index 12/31/2014 = 152
S&P 500 12/9/2013 = 100
S&P 500 12/31/2013 = 102
S&P 500 12/31/2014 = 114
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 102 from 152 which gives subtract(152, 102)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 102 which gives divide(subtract(152, 102), 102)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: during 2010 , what was the return on assets?
Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2012 is 146 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2011 is -100 ( 100 ) ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2010 is 131 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2009 is 119 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2008 is -2397 ( 2397 ) ; ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total assets of year ended december 31 2012 is 6392 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2011 is 6069 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2010 is 5270 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2009 is 5097 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2008 is 4821 ;
### Output:
Logic: net income divided by total assets
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net Earnings 2012 = $146 million
Net Earnings 2011 = -$100 million
Net Earnings 2010 = $131 million
Net Earnings 2009 = $119 million
Net Earnings 2008 = -$2397 million
Total Assets 2012 = $6392 million
Total Assets 2011 = $6069 million
Total Assets 2010 = $5270 million
Total Assets 2009 = $5097 million
Total Assets 2008 = $4821 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 131 by 5270 which gives divide(131, 5270)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(131, 5270), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(131, 5270), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2017 and 2018 , what was the increase observed in the net capitalized costs?
Context: the net capitalized costs of 2018 is $ 25655931 ; the net capitalized costs of 2017 is $ 23364494 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the net capitalized costs of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net Capitalized Costs 2018 = $25655931
Net Capitalized Costs 2017 = $23364494
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 25655931 by 23364494 which gives divide(25655931, 23364494)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(25655931, 23364494), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(25655931, 23364494), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(25655931, 23364494), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: 3 net income ( loss ) $ 132.8 \\n5 income tax expense ( benefit ) 62.7
Context: ( in millions ) the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 132.8 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 119.0 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is $ 17.1 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is $ -29.2 ( 29.2 ) ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2009 is $ -373.4 ( 373.4 ) ; ( in millions ) the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2013 is 62.7 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is 67.1 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is 11.2 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is -7.8 ( 7.8 ) ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2009 is -87.8 ( 87.8 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: taxes divided by pretax income
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net Income 2013 = $132.8 million
Net Income 2012 = $119.0 million
Net Income 2011 = $17.1 million
Net Income 2010 = -$29.2 million
Net Income 2009 = -$373.4 million
Income Tax Expense 2013 = $62.7 million
Income Tax Expense 2012 = $67.1 million
Income Tax Expense 2011 = $11.2 million
Income Tax Expense 2010 = -$7.8 million
Income Tax Expense 2009 = -$87.8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 62.7 to 132.8 which gives add(62.7, 132.8)
step 2: divide 62.7 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2016 and 2017?
Context: the interest net of capitalized interest of 2017 is $ 275305 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the cash paid as interest net of capitalized interest in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest 2017 = $275305
Interest 2016 = $252030
Interest 2015 = $222088
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 275305 by 252030 which gives divide(275305, 252030)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(275305, 252030), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(275305, 252030), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(275305, 252030), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average of the deductions during the period of 2003-2006?
Context: balance december 31 2003 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 514177 is -1390 ( 1390 ) ; balance december 31 2003 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 514177 is -15244 ( 15244 ) ; balance december 31 2003 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 514177 is -12807 ( 12807 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the value of the deductions divided by three ( the sum of the years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deductions 2014 (Property 1) = -$1390
Deductions 2014 (Property 2) = -$15244
Deductions 2014 (Property 3) = -$12807
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 1390 to 15244 which gives add(1390, 15244)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 12807 which gives add(add(1390, 15244), 12807)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(1390, 15244), 12807), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(1390, 15244), 12807), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentual increase in the additions during 2004 and 2005?
Context: balance december 31 2003 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 514177 is 82551 ; balance december 31 2003 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 514177 is 83656 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the addition in 2005 divided by the value in 2004 , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Addition 2014 (Expense 1) = $82551
Addition 2014 (Expense 2) = $83656
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 83656 by 82551 which gives divide(83656, 82551)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(83656, 82551), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(83656, 82551), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(83656, 82551), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total gross amount of money that the company received from their favorable audit?
Context: the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
### Output:
Logic: the initial $ 12356 was added to the total due to them already subtracting that from expenses earlier . the next is unattributed money earned from investments . once added up the interest that was earned , you get $ 32885 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Overall Tax Benefit = $25920 thousand
FIN 48 Reserve = $12356 thousand
Net Expense 2010 = -$9938 thousand
Accrued Interest 2010 = -$10591 thousand
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 12356 to 9938 which gives add(12356, 9938)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 10591 which gives add(add(12356, 9938), 10591),
The final logic expression is add(add(12356, 9938), 10591).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the loss on datacenter and related legal fees in 2015 in millions dollars?
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the loss on datacenter and related legal fees of year-over-yearchange is $ 28.6 ; the loss on datacenter and related legal fees of change as apercentage of2015 expenses is 2% ( 2 % ) ; recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees .
### Output:
Logic: considering that $ 28.6 millions represents a 2% increase in the loss on datacenter and related legal fees of 2015 , the original value is calculated dividing the increase of $ 28.6 by its the percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Year-over-year Change Loss = $28.6 million
Change as a Percentage of 2015 Expenses = 2%
Total Losses and Expenses = $28.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 28.6 by 2% which gives divide(28.6, 2%),
The final logic expression is divide(28.6, 2%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what would the estimated minimum amount of tier 1 common equity be under the minimum basel 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) standard ? ( billions )
Context: tier 1 common under basel i rules the estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules of $ 148887 is $ 151202 ; the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) .
### Output:
Logic: estimate total capital by dividing by the actual 9.4%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Tier 1 Common Basel I = $148887
Tier 1 Common Basel III = $151202
Tier 1 Common Ratio = 9.4%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 151202 by 9.4% which gives divide(151202, 9.4%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 6.5% which gives multiply(divide(151202, 9.4%), 6.5%),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(151202, 9.4%), 6.5%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the net debt to equity ratio
Context: the total liabilities assumed of ( in millions ) is 85 ; the net assets acquired of ( in millions ) is $ 110 ;
### Output:
Logic: the debt to equity ratio is the sum of the debt divided by the equity
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total Liabilities Assumed = $85 million
Net Assets Acquired = $110 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 85 by 110 which gives divide(85, 110),
The final logic expression is divide(85, 110).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted stocks in 2006 and 2007?
Context: the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the 2007 weighted average grant date fair value divided by the 2006's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Restricted Stock Awards 2007 = $63.59
Restricted Stock Awards 2006 = $54.36
Restricted Stock Awards 2005 = $32.81
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 63.59 by 54.36 which gives divide(63.59, 54.36)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(63.59, 54.36), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(63.59, 54.36), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(63.59, 54.36), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2013-2015 , what is the highest value of interest incurred?
Context: the interest incurred of 2015 is $ 152.6 ; the interest incurred of 2014 is $ 158.1 ; the interest incurred of 2013 is $ 167.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value of interest incurred .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest Incurred 2015 = $152.6
Interest Incurred 2014 = $158.1
Interest Incurred 2013 = $167.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_max(interest incurred, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average rate for the international plans?
Context: qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the rates divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Qualified Plan Rate = 2.25%
International Plans Rate = 7.00%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 2.25% to 7.00% which gives add(2.25%, 7.00%)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(2.25%, 7.00%), const_2)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(2.25%, 7.00%), const_2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(2.25%, 7.00%), const_2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the change in accumulated depreciation from depreciation expenses from 2013 to december 31 , 2015
Context: $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .
### Output:
Logic: the amount of accumulated depreciation from the years 2015-2013 was the the sum of the depreciation expense for each year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Depreciation Expense 2015 = $405
Depreciation Expense 2014 = $392
Depreciation Expense 2013 = $374
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 405 to 392 which gives add(405, 392)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 374 which gives add(add(405, 392), 374),
The final logic expression is add(add(405, 392), 374).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual reduction of intersegment sales concerning the total sales during 2013 and 2014?
Context: the intersegment sales of 2015 is 1687 ; the intersegment sales of 2014 is 1941 ; the intersegment sales of 2013 is 2235 ; the total sales of 2015 is $ 5142 ; the total sales of 2014 is $ 5450 ; the total sales of 2013 is $ 5561 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the percentage of intersegment sales concerning total sales in 2013 ( 40.19% ) and 2014 ( 35.61% )
The required values from the context for the question are:
Intersegment Sales 2015 = $1687
Intersegment Sales 2014 = $1941
Intersegment Sales 2013 = $2235
Total Sales 2015 = $5142
Total Sales 2014 = $5450
Total Sales 2013 = $5561
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1941 by 5450 which gives divide(1941, 5450)
step 2: divide 2235 by 5561 which gives divide(2235, 5561)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(2235, 5561), divide(1941, 5450))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(2235, 5561), divide(1941, 5450)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(2235, 5561), divide(1941, 5450)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the contract terms of 10 years , what will be the total expense with the depreciation of the electronics and performance materials segment?\\n
Context: the electronics and performance materials of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 12 ; the electronics and performance materials of increase life by 1 year is $ -11 ( 11 ) ; there are also long-term customer supply contracts associated with the tonnage gases business within the electronics and performance materials segment . these contracts principally have initial terms of 10 to 15 years .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of years of the contract multiplied by the increased life by year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Decrease Life = $12
Increase Life = -$11
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 10 by 11 which gives multiply(10, 11),
The final logic expression is multiply(10, 11).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2008 , what is the percentage of loans held-for-sale in total loans?
Context: ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of 2009 is -389 ( 389 ) ; the loans held-for-sale of 2008 is -2728 ( 2728 ) ; the loans held-for-sale of 2007 is -502 ( 502 ) ; ( in millions ) the total loans of 2009 is -3939 ( 3939 ) ; the total loans of 2008 is -3887 ( 3887 ) ; the total loans of 2007 is -720 ( 720 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the loans held-for-sale divided by the total loans in 2008 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Loans Held-for-sale 2009 = -$389 million
Loans Held-for-sale 2008 = -$2728 million
Loans Held-for-sale 2007 = -$502 million
Total Loans 2009 = -$3939 million
Total Loans 2008 = -$3887 million
Total Loans 2007 = -$720 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2728 by 3887 which gives divide(2728, 3887)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2728, 3887), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2728, 3887), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties concerning the total carrying amount in 2017?
Context: the carrying amount at beginning of period of 2018 is $ 946848 ; the carrying amount at beginning of period of 2017 is $ 912926 ; during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million .
### Output:
Logic: it is the carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties in millions divided by the total carrying amount , also in millions , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Carrying amount at beginning of period of 2018 = 946848
Carrying amount at beginning of period of 2017 = 912926
Carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties written down in 2017 = 370
Fair value of proved oil and gas properties after write-down = 146
Pretax impairment charges in 2017 = 224
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 912926 by const_1000 which gives divide(912926, const_1000)
step 2: divide 370 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(370, divide(912926, const_1000))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(370, divide(912926, const_1000)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(370, divide(912926, const_1000)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate of maturities from 2008 to 2009
Context: 2008 the 2009 of $ 193101 is 605762 ; 2008 the 2008 of $ 193101 is $ 193101 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change in the maturities from 2008 to 2009 is the rate of the growth of the maturities from that year to th enxt
The required values from the context for the question are:
Maturities in 2008 = 193101
Maturities in 2009 = 605762
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 193101 from 605762 which gives subtract(605762, 193101)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 193101 which gives divide(subtract(605762, 193101), 193101)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(605762, 193101), 193101), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(605762, 193101), 193101), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the highest revenue observed in this period?
Context: years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2011 is $ 4501 ; the revenue of 2010 is $ 2111 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 1267 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Revenue in 2011 = 4501
Revenue in 2010 = 2111
Revenue in 2009 = 1267
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_min(revenue, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015 and 2016 , what is the percentual increase observed in the total compensation expense under the stock plan?
Context: total compensation expense under the stock plan was approximately $ 10.8 million , $ 12.2 million and $ 6.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the compensation expense under the stock plan in 2016 divided by the 2015's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Compensation expense under the stock plan in 2017 = 10.8 million
Compensation expense under the stock plan in 2016 = 12.2 million
Compensation expense under the stock plan in 2015 = 6.9 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 12.2 by 6.9 which gives divide(12.2, 6.9)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(12.2, 6.9), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(12.2, 6.9), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(12.2, 6.9), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of unconsolidated units among the total units?
Context: multifamily the unconsolidated of communities is 1 ; the unconsolidated of units is 269 ; multifamily the total of communities is 304 ; the total of units is 100864 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of unconsolidated units divided by the total units , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unconsolidated units in multifamily communities = 1
Unconsolidated units = 269
Total units in multifamily communities = 304
Total units = 100864
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 269 by 100864 which gives divide(269, 100864)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(269, 100864), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(269, 100864), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the return of the second year of the investment for peer group?
Context: the peer group of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 137 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 175 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 186 ; the peer group of 12/31/2016 is $ 188 ; the peer group of 12/31/2017 is $ 238 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the investment in the second year divided by the first year's , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Peer group value on 12/31/2012 = 100
Peer group value on 12/31/2013 = 137
Peer group value on 12/31/2014 = 175
Peer group value on 12/31/2015 = 186
Peer group value on 12/31/2016 = 188
Peer group value on 12/31/2017 = 238
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 175 by 137 which gives divide(175, 137)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(175, 137), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(175, 137), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(175, 137), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in billions , what is the pro-forma shareholders equity?
Context: ( in billions except ratios ) the assets of reported is $ 1562.1 ; the assets of pro forma is $ 1623.9 ; ( in billions except ratios ) the liabilities of reported is 1438.9 ; the liabilities of pro forma is 1500.9 ;
### Output:
Logic: assets minus liabilities= se
The required values from the context for the question are:
Reported assets = 1562.1
Pro forma assets = 1623.9
Reported liabilities = 1438.9
Pro forma liabilities = 1500.9
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1500.9 from 1623.9 which gives subtract(1623.9, 1500.9),
The final logic expression is subtract(1623.9, 1500.9).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate of the s&p 500 index from 2011 to 2016
Context: the s&p 500 index of 2011 is 100.0 ; the s&p 500 index of 2012 is 116.00 ; the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 153.57 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 174.60 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 177.01 ; the s&p 500 index of 2016 is 198.18 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2011 is 100.0 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2012 is 113.39 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2013 is 142.85 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2014 is 150.44 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2015 is 142.44 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2016 is 165.34 ;
### Output:
Logic: to find the growth rate you divide the change in the amounts by the earliest amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
S&P 500 index in 2011 = 100.0
S&P 500 index in 2012 = 116.00
S&P 500 index in 2013 = 153.57
S&P 500 index in 2014 = 174.60
S&P 500 index in 2015 = 177.01
S&P 500 index in 2016 = 198.18
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100.0 from 198.18 which gives subtract(198.18, 100.0)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(198.18, 100.0), const_100)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(198.18, 100.0), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(198.18, 100.0), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2013 and 2012 , what is the variation observed in the expected return on plan assets , in millions?
Context: years ended december 31 the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2013 is -1097 ( 1097 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2012 is -970 ( 970 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2011 is -972 ( 972 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2013 is -126 ( 126 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2012 is -136 ( 136 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of 2011 is -142 ( 142 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between each year's expected return on plan assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2013 = -1097
Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2012 = -970
Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2011 = -972
Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2013 = -126
Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2012 = -136
Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2011 = -142
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 970 from 1097 which gives subtract(1097, 970),
The final logic expression is subtract(1097, 970).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what as the leverage of the debt to assets of elder trust at the time of the to the purchase
Context: the total liabilities assumed of ( in millions ) is 85 ; the total assets acquired of ( in millions ) is $ 195 ;
### Output:
Logic: the ratio of the debt to the assets show how much of each dollar invested in debt produces assets
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total liabilities assumed = 85
Total assets acquired = 195
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 85 by 195 which gives divide(85, 195),
The final logic expression is divide(85, 195).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average tax benefit , in millions?
Context: years ended december 31 the tax benefit of 2009 is 68 ; the tax benefit of 2008 is 82 ; the tax benefit of 2007 is 64 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all tax benefits divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Tax benefit of 2009 = 68
Tax benefit of 2008 = 82
Tax benefit of 2007 = 64
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(tax benefit, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of class b-3 common stock in relation with the total class b common stocks in 2009?
Context: ( in thousands ) the class b-1 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 0.6 ; the class b-1 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 0.6 ; ( in thousands ) the class b-2 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 0.8 ; the class b-2 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 0.8 ; ( in thousands ) the class b-3 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 1.3 ; the class b-3 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 1.3 ; ( in thousands ) the class b-4 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 0.4 ; the class b-4 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 0.4 ;
### Output:
Logic: considering the sum of all class b common stocks , the percentage is calculated dividing the class b-3 ( 1.3 ) by the total amount .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Class b-1 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 0.6
Class b-1 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 0.6
Class b-2 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 0.8
Class b-2 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 0.8
Class b-3 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 1.3
Class b-3 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 1.3
Class b-4 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 0.4
Class b-4 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 0.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 1.3 to 0.4 which gives add(1.3, 0.4)
step 2: add 0.6 to 0.8 which gives add(0.6, 0.8)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8))
step 4: divide 1.3 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(1.3, add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8)))
step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.3, add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8))), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.3, add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8))), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of fully-insured memberships among the total commercial medical membership?
Context: the fully-insured of smart plans and other consumer membership is 392500 ; the fully-insured of other commercial membership is 1586300 ; the fully-insured of commercial medical membership is 1978800 ; the total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership is 670000 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2950800 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3620800 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of fully-insured memberships divided by the total number of memberships , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Fully-insured memberships of smart plans and other consumer membership = 392500
Fully-insured memberships of other commercial membership = 1586300
Fully-insured memberships of commercial medical membership = 1978800
Total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership = 670000
Total commercial medical of other commercial membership = 2950800
Total commercial medical of commercial medical membership = 3620800
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1978800 by 3620800 which gives divide(1978800, 3620800)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1978800, 3620800), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1978800, 3620800), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the increase in the interest expenses during 2017 and 2018?
Context: the interest expense of 2018 is $ 130.5 ; the interest expense of 2017 is $ 120.6 ; the interest expense of 2016 is $ 115.2 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the interest expense of 2018 divided by the 2017's then turned into a percentage.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest expense of 2018 = 130.5
Interest expense of 2017 = 120.6
Interest expense of 2016 = 115.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 130.5 by 120.6 which gives divide(130.5, 120.6)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(130.5, 120.6), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(130.5, 120.6), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(130.5, 120.6), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the value of the total premiums and aso fees , in billions?
Context: for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , tricare administrative services fees totaled $ 50.1 million , or 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees .
### Output:
Logic: considering the $ 50.1 million as 0.4% , the total 100% is calculated by multiplying the 50.1 by 100 , then dividing by 0.4 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Tricare administrative services fees in 2005 = 50.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 50.1 by const_100 which gives multiply(50.1, const_100)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 0.4 which gives divide(multiply(50.1, const_100), 0.4)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_1000 which gives divide(divide(multiply(50.1, const_100), 0.4), const_1000),
The final logic expression is divide(divide(multiply(50.1, const_100), 0.4), const_1000).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013
Context: the expected volatility of 2014 is 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2013 is 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2012 is 27.8% ( 27.8 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected volatility of 2014 = 27.5%
Expected volatility of 2013 = 28.9%
Expected volatility of 2012 = 27.8%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 27.8 from 28.9 which gives subtract(28.9, 27.8)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 27.8 which gives divide(subtract(28.9, 27.8), 27.8)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 27.8), 27.8), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 27.8), 27.8), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase in the deductions during 2006 and 2007 , in thousands of dollars?
Context: balance december 31 2004 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 595338 is -12807 ( 12807 ) ; balance december 31 2004 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 595338 is -80258 ( 80258 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those deduction values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deductions during period 2014 disposition and retirements of property in 2004 = 595338
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 12807 from 80258 which gives subtract(80258, 12807),
The final logic expression is subtract(80258, 12807).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in the excess of current cost over lifo cost from 2008 to 2009 .
Context: the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from the recent to the most recent divide by the recent
The required values from the context for the question are:
Excess of current cost over LIFO cost at January 30, 2009 = 50.0 million
Excess of current cost over LIFO cost at February 1, 2008 = 6.1 million
LIFO provisions during 2008 = 43.9 million
LIFO provisions during 2007 = 6.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 6.1 from 50.0 which gives subtract(50.0, 6.1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(50.0, 6.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(50.0, 6.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the ratio of the long-term debt after 2016 to the total long term debt
Context: 2012 the thereafter of $ 29 is 1305 ; 2012 the total long-term debt of $ 29 is $ 1859 ;
### Output:
Logic: the ratio of the long term debt after 2016 to the total long term debt means that for every $ 1 of the total long term debt is made up of $ 0.70 of long term debt due after 2016
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term debt after 2016 in 2012 = 29
Long-term debt after 2016 = 1305
Total long-term debt in 2012 = 29
Total long-term debt = 1859
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1305 by 1859 which gives divide(1305, 1859),
The final logic expression is divide(1305, 1859).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2008 , what is the variation between the high of foreign exchange contracts and the high of the interest rate contracts?
Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 28.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 14.2 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 average is $ 21.6 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 18.8 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 5.3 ; the foreign exchange contracts of average is $ 11.3 ; ( in millions ) the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 high is 34.3 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 low is 23.0 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 average is 29.5 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 high is 28.8 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 low is 12.6 ; the interest rate contracts of average is 20.0 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between these values.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
High value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 28.4
Low value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 14.2
Average value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 21.6
High value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 18.8
Low value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 5.3
Average value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 11.3
High value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 34.3
Low value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 23.0
Average value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 29.5
High value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 28.8
Low value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 12.6
Average value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 20.0
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 28.4 from 34.3 which gives subtract(34.3, 28.4),
The final logic expression is subtract(34.3, 28.4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average free cash flow provided by continuing operations from 2016 to 2018 in millions
Context: years ended december 31 the free cash flow provided by continuing operations of 2018 is $ 1446 ; the free cash flow provided by continuing operations of 2017 is $ 486 ; the free cash flow provided by continuing operations of 2016 is $ 1673 ;
### Output:
Logic: the average free cash flow provided by continuing operations from 2016 to 2018 was $ 1201.2
The required values from the context for the question are:
Free cash flow provided by continuing operations in 2018 = 1446
Free cash flow provided by continuing operations in 2017 = 486
Free cash flow provided by continuing operations in 2016 = 1673
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 1446 to 486 which gives add(1446, 486)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1673 which gives add(add(1446, 486), 1673)
step 3: add the expression of step 2 to const_3 which gives add(add(add(1446, 486), 1673), const_3)
step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_2 which gives divide(add(add(add(1446, 486), 1673), const_3), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(add(1446, 486), 1673), const_3), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in the 2009 global incentive plan what is the percent of the shares available to the shares subject to a outstanding awards
Context: the 2009 global incentive plan of shares available for awards is 2322450 ; the 2009 global incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards is 2530454 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent is the amount in question divide by the total
The required values from the context for the question are:
Shares available for awards in 2009 global incentive plan = 2322450
Shares subject to outstanding awards in 2009 global incentive plan = 2530454
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 2322450 to 2530454 which gives add(2322450, 2530454)
step 2: divide 2322450 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(2322450, add(2322450, 2530454))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2322450, add(2322450, 2530454)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2322450, add(2322450, 2530454)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2019-2020 , what was the decrease observed in the projected benefit payments?
Context: 2017 the 2019 of $ 11.5 is 10.7 ; 2017 the 2020 of $ 11.5 is 10.2 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the 2020 value of the projected benefit payment divided by the 2019's then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Projected benefit payment in 2019 = 11.5
Projected benefit payment in 2017 = 10.7
Projected benefit payment in 2020 = 10.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 10.2 by 10.7 which gives divide(10.2, 10.7)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1), const_100)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: between 2018 and 2017 what was the percent change in the weighted average cost per share
Context: the weighted average cost per share of 2018 is $ 69.06 ; the weighted average cost per share of 2017 is $ 63.84 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the difference between the 2 periods divide by the earliest period
The required values from the context for the question are:
Weighted average cost per share in 2018 = 69.06
Weighted average cost per share in 2017 = 63.84
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 63.84 from 69.06 which gives subtract(69.06, 63.84)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 63.84 which gives divide(subtract(69.06, 63.84), 63.84),
The final logic expression is divide(subtract(69.06, 63.84), 63.84).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what were the average operating rental expenses from 2015 to 2017 in millions
Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 29 million , $ 24 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the average is the sum of the periods divided by the count
The required values from the context for the question are:
Rental expenses under operating leases in 2017 = 29 million
Rental expenses under operating leases in 2016 = 24 million
Rental expenses under operating leases in 2015) = 21 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 29 to 24 which gives add(29, 24)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 21 which gives add(add(29, 24), 21)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(29, 24), 21), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(29, 24), 21), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much more money would jp morgan need to meet management 2019s plan to reach an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5%?
Context: tier 1 common under basel i rules the estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules of $ 140342 is $ 143966 ; the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules would be 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 . management 2019s current objective is for the firm to reach , by the end of 2013 , an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) . tier 1 common under basel i rules the estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a ) of $ 140342 is $ 1647903 ;
### Output:
Logic: to find out how much money the firm would need we need to take the current estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules and multiple it by 9.5% . we then take this number and subtract it from the current estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules . this will get us our final answer of $ 12584
The required values from the context for the question are:
Final answer based on estimated risk-weighted assets under Basel III rules and Tier 1 common under Basel III rules = 12584
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1647903 by 9.5% which gives multiply(1647903, 9.5%)
step 2: subtract 143966 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(multiply(1647903, 9.5%), 143966),
The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(1647903, 9.5%), 143966).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of dec 13 , 2013 , if all forfeited shares became vested , what percentage of shares would be vested?
Context: cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding .
### Output:
Logic: add forfeited shares to vested shares , then divide by total shares
The required values from the context for the question are:
Shares of restricted stock received by class b common unit holders = 3798508
Shares of restricted stock that vested/settled = 1200544
Shares of restricted stock that were forfeited = 5931
Outstanding shares of restricted stock = 2592033
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 5931 to 1200544 which gives add(5931, 1200544)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3798508 which gives divide(add(5931, 1200544), 3798508)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(5931, 1200544), 3798508), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(5931, 1200544), 3798508), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation of the effective tax rate considering the years 2018-2019?
Context: the effective tax rate was 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) and 26.0% ( 26.0 % ) in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those effective tax rates during these years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Effective tax rate in fiscal year 2019: 21.0%
Effective tax rate in fiscal year 2018: 26.0%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21.0% from 26.0% which gives subtract(26.0%, 21.0%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(26.0%, 21.0%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(26.0%, 21.0%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the operating margin during 2010 and 2011?
Context: years ended december 31 , the operating margin of 2011 is 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2010 is 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those margins .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating margin in 2011: 19.3%
Operating margin in 2010: 18.6%
Operating margin in 2009: 14.3%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 18.6% from 19.3% which gives subtract(19.3%, 18.6%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(19.3%, 18.6%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(19.3%, 18.6%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the variation observed in the growth of the atoi in the transportation and construction solutions engineered products and solutions segments?
Context: atoi for the engineered products and solutions segment increased $ 47 , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily related to net productivity improvements across all businesses as well as the volume increase from both the rti acquisition and organic revenue growth , partially offset by a lower margin product mix and pricing pressures in the aerospace end market . atoi for the transportation and construction solutions segment increased $ 10 , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , principally driven by net productivity improvements across all businesses and growth in the building and construction segment , partially offset by lower demand in the north american heavy duty truck and brazilian markets. .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the percentual growth of both segments' atoi .
The required values from the context for the question are:
ATOI increase for engineered products and solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: $47
ATOI increase for transportation and construction solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: $10
Percentage increase in ATOI for engineered products and solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: 8%
Percentage increase in ATOI for transportation and construction solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: 6%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 6% from 8% which gives subtract(8%, 6%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(8%, 6%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(8%, 6%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the net adjustments as recorded in 2011 in millions
Context: ( $ in millions ) the payments of employee compensation is -24 ( 24 ) ; the payments of other accruals is -36 ( 36 ) ; the payments of total is -60 ( 60 ) ; ( $ in millions ) the adjustments of employee compensation is 47 ; the adjustments of other accruals is -3 ( 3 ) ; the adjustments of total is 44 ;
### Output:
Logic: the net adjustment is the sum of both activities in 2011
The required values from the context for the question are:
Payments of employee compensation in 2011: -$24 million
Payments of other accruals in 2011: -$36 million
Payments of total in 2011: -$60 million
Adjustments of employee compensation in 2011: $47 million
Adjustments of other accruals in 2011: -$3 million
Adjustments of total in 2011: $44 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 24 by const_m1 which gives multiply(24, const_m1)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 47 which gives add(multiply(24, const_m1), 47),
The final logic expression is add(multiply(24, const_m1), 47).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the lowest value of unamortized expense during this period?
Context: the unamortized expense based on current performance levels of 2011 is $ 60 ; the unamortized expense based on current performance levels of 2010 is $ 18 ; the unamortized expense based on current performance levels of 2009 is $ 4 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value of unamortized expense .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unamortized expense based on current performance levels in 2011: $60
Unamortized expense based on current performance levels in 2010: $18
Unamortized expense based on current performance levels in 2009: $4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_min(unamortized expense based on current performance levels, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average price of the the nareit all equity index from 2005 to 2009
Context: the the nareit all equity index of 2005 is 100 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2006 is 135 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2007 is 114 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2008 is 71 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2009 is 91 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2010 is 116 ;
### Output:
Logic: the average share price over the 5 years is the sum of the share price divide by 5
The required values from the context for the question are:
Nareit all equity index in 2005: 100
Nareit all equity index in 2006: 135
Nareit all equity index in 2007: 114
Nareit all equity index in 2008: 71
Nareit all equity index in 2009: 91
Nareit all equity index in 2010: 116
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 100 to 135 which gives add(100, 135)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 114 which gives add(add(100, 135), 114)
step 3: add the expression of step 2 to 71 which gives add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71)
step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 91 which gives add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91)
step 5: add the expression of step 4 to const_5 which gives add(add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91), const_5)
step 6: divide the expression of step 5 by const_2 which gives divide(add(add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91), const_5), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91), const_5), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years from 2009 to 2013 in millions
Context: for intangible assets subject to amortization , the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows : 2009 - $ 41.1 million , 2010 - $ 27.3 million , 2011 - $ 20.9 million , 2012 - $ 17.0 million , and 2013 - $ 12.0 million .
### Output:
Logic: this the sum of all amounts associated
The required values from the context for the question are:
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2009: $41.1 million
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2010: $27.3 million
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2011: $20.9 million
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2012: $17.0 million
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2013: $12.0 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 41.1 to 27.3 which gives add(41.1, 27.3)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 20.9 which gives add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9)
step 3: add the expression of step 2 to 17.0 which gives add(add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9), 17.0)
step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 12.0 which gives add(add(add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9), 17.0), 12.0),
The final logic expression is add(add(add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9), 17.0), 12.0).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the increase observed in the initial balance between 2017 and 2018?
Context: the balance at january 1 of 2018 is 1162635 ; the balance at january 1 of 2017 is 1053027 ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is 1045640 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the initial balance of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance at January 1 of 2018: $1,162,635
Balance at January 1 of 2017: $1,053,027
Balance at January 1 of 2016: $1,045,640
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1162635 by 1053027 which gives divide(1162635, 1053027)
step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1162635, 1053027), 1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1162635, 1053027), 1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1162635, 1053027), 1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the estimated number of shares of series a common stock based on the approximate cash dividend in millions
Context: based on the number of outstanding shares of our series a common stock , the anticipated annual cash dividend is approximately $ 25 million . dividend policy in july 2005 , our board of directors adopted a policy of declaring , subject to legally available funds , a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our common stock at an annual rate initially equal to approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of the $ 16 price per share in the initial public offering of our series a common stock ( or $ 0.16 per share ) unless our board of directors , in its sole discretion , determines otherwise , commencing the second quarter of 2005 .
### Output:
Logic: to get the number of shouts of series a common stock you divide the total annual cash dividend by the dividend amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Anticipated annual cash dividend for Series A common stock: Approximately $25 million
Price per share in the initial public offering of Series A common stock: $16
Annual cash dividend rate for Series A common stock in initial public offering: Approximately 1% (1%)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 25 by 0.16 which gives divide(25, 0.16),
The final logic expression is divide(25, 0.16).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the average value recorded for reserves for environmental matters , in millions of dollars?
Context: as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the reserves available during 2016 and 2017 divided by two ( the period of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Reserves for environmental matters as of December 31, 2017: $28.9 million
Reserves for environmental matters as of December 31, 2016: $30.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 28.9 to 30.6 which gives add(28.9, 30.6)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(28.9, 30.6), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(28.9, 30.6), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percent of the growth in meausurement of the booking holdings inc.2016 to 2017
Context: measurement pointdecember 31 the 2016 of booking holdings inc . is 236.31 ; the 2016 of nasdaqcomposite index is 187.19 ; the 2016 of s&p 500index is 170.84 ; the 2016 of rdg internetcomposite is 235.33 ; measurement pointdecember 31 the 2017 of booking holdings inc . is 280.10 ; the 2017 of nasdaqcomposite index is 242.29 ; the 2017 of s&p 500index is 208.14 ; the 2017 of rdg internetcomposite is 338.52 ;
### Output:
Logic: the growth in measurement of the booking holdings inc.2016 to 2017 was 18.5%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Measurement point for Booking Holdings Inc. on December 31, 2016: 236.31
Measurement point for Booking Holdings Inc. on December 31, 2017: 280.10
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 236.31 from 280.10 which gives subtract(280.10, 236.31),
The final logic expression is subtract(280.10, 236.31).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the operating profit margin for the year of 2015?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the revenue of 2015 is $ 3339 ; the revenue of 2014 is $ 2623 ; the revenue of 2013 is $ 2235 ; the revenue of % ( % ) change 2014 to 2015 is 27.3% ( 27.3 % ) ; the revenue of % ( % ) change 2013 to 2014 is 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the operating income before depreciation and amortization of 2015 is $ 1464 ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of 2014 is $ 1096 ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of 2013 is $ 943 ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of % ( % ) change 2014 to 2015 is 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of % ( % ) change 2013 to 2014 is 16.3% ( 16.3 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: operating margin is a measure of the efficiency of on going operations before extraneous expenses of overhead .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Revenue for the year 2015: $3,339 million
Revenue for the year 2014: $2,623 million
Revenue for the year 2013: $2,235 million
Operating income before depreciation and amortization for 2015: $1,464 million
Operating income before depreciation and amortization for 2014: $1,096 million
Operating income before depreciation and amortization for 2013: $943 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1464 by 3339 which gives divide(1464, 3339)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1464, 3339), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1464, 3339), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2010 , what is the difference between the expected contributions and the goodwill and other intangible assets value , in millions?
Context: estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 381 million in 2010 as compared with $ 437 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired .
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Provision for loan losses in 2011: $1.152 billion
Provision for loan losses in 2008: $1.6 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 381 from 437 which gives subtract(437, 381),
The final logic expression is subtract(437, 381).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the operating expense ratio for ccuk ( in millions ) ?
Context: ccuk has contracted annual revenues of approximately a327.2 million ( $ 48.5 million ) for the provision of transmission , distribution and multiplexing services related to its multiplex licenses , which replaces the approximately a319.4 million annual revenues previously earned from the itvd contract and is in addition to the revenues generated from the 1998 bbc digital transmission contract . since ccuk is providing a more complete end-to-end service to content providers than was provided to itvd , ccuk is incurring certain additional annual operating costs of approximately a34.6 million ( $ 8.2 million ) .
### Output:
Logic: the operating expense ratio is the operating expensive divided by the revenue . line 19 has the revenue for ccuk and line 23 has the operating costs for ccuk .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Medical and other expenses payable: -$37,375 (in thousands)
Other current liabilities: -$23,359 (in thousands)
Other liabilities: -$5,915 (in thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 8.2 by 48.5 which gives divide(8.2, 48.5),
The final logic expression is divide(8.2, 48.5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2009 , what percentage of its net aggregate carrying amount did the firm record as its allowance for loan losses?
Context: in 2009 , an allowance for loan losses of $ 1.6 billion was recorded for the prime mortgage and option arm pools of loans . the net aggregate carrying amount of the pools that have an allowance for loan losses was $ 47.2 billion at december 31 , 2009 .
### Output:
Logic: the firm's allowance for loan losses , $ 1.6 billion , came from an aggregate pool of $ 47.2 billion .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1.6 by 47.2 which gives divide(1.6, 47.2)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.6, 47.2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.6, 47.2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total value of liabilities , in thousands?
Context: the medical and other expenses payable of ( in thousands ) is -37375 ( 37375 ) ; the other current liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -23359 ( 23359 ) ; the other liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -5915 ( 5915 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all liabilities.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Medical and other expenses payable: -$37,375 (in thousands)
Other current liabilities: -$23,359 (in thousands)
Other liabilities: -$5,915 (in thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 37375 to 23359 which gives add(37375, 23359)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 5915 which gives add(add(37375, 23359), 5915),
The final logic expression is add(add(37375, 23359), 5915).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual contribution of the acquisition of firth rixson in the third-party sales in 2014?
Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 1882 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 2021 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 1951 ; third-party sales for this segment increased 4% ( 4 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , primarily due to higher volumes and the acquisition of firth rixson ( $ 81 2014see above ) .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the acquisition of firth rixson divided by the total third-party sales .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Third-party sales in 2015: $1,882 million
Third-party sales in 2014: $2,021 million
Third-party sales in 2013: $1,951 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 81 by 2021 which gives divide(81, 2021)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(81, 2021), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(81, 2021), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as december 312011 what was the amount of the provision for impairment in billion
Context: the provision for loan losses has declined for three consecutive years , down 72% ( 72 % ) from its peak of $ 1.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .
### Output:
Logic: as december 312011 the amount of the provision for impairment in billion was 1.152 compared to 1.6 in 2008
The required values from the context for the question are:
Anticipated annual cash dividend for Series A common stock: Approximately $25 million
Price per share in the initial public offering of Series A common stock: $16
Annual cash dividend rate for Series A common stock in initial public offering: Approximately 1% (1%)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1.6 by 72% which gives multiply(1.6, 72%),
The final logic expression is multiply(1.6, 72%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average of the total amount of expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans during the years 2016-2020 , in millions?
Context: ( in millions ) the 2016-2020 of year is 62.8 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the total value ( $ 62.8 ) divided by the period of years 2016-2020 ( 5 )
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total for the years 2016-2020: $62.8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 62.8 by const_5 which gives divide(62.8, const_5),
The final logic expression is divide(62.8, const_5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average value for additions for tax positions of the current year?
Context: unrecognized tax benefits the additions for tax positions of the current year of 2016 is 15.0 ; the additions for tax positions of the current year of 2015 is 6.9 ; the additions for tax positions of the current year of 2014 is 8.1 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all additions for tax positions of the current year divided by three ( number of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Additions for tax positions of the current year in 2016: $15.0 million
Additions for tax positions of the current year in 2015: $6.9 million
Additions for tax positions of the current year in 2014: $8.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(additions for tax positions of the current year, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the average expense for environmental remediation at sites , in millions of dollars?
Context: the company incurred $ 3.2 million , $ 23.3 million , and $ 4.4 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by the company .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all environmental remediation expenses during these years , divided by three ( number of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Environmental remediation expenses in 2017: $3.2 million
Environmental remediation expenses in 2016: $23.3 million
Environmental remediation expenses in 2015: $4.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 3.2 to 23.3 which gives add(3.2, 23.3)
step 2: add 4.4 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(4.4, add(3.2, 23.3))
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(4.4, add(3.2, 23.3)), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(4.4, add(3.2, 23.3)), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2014 what was the total mainline operating expenses in millions
Context: year the 2014 of gallons is 3644 ; the 2014 of average price per gallon is $ 2.91 ; the 2014 of aircraft fuel expense is $ 10592 ; the 2014 of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the total operating expenses is derived as a result of dividing the fuel expenses by their percent of operating costs
The required values from the context for the question are:
Gallons in 2014: 3,644
Average price per gallon in 2014: $2.91
Aircraft fuel expense in 2014: $10,592
Percentage of total mainline operating expenses in 2014: 33.2%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 10592 by 33.2% which gives divide(10592, 33.2%),
The final logic expression is divide(10592, 33.2%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed in the net benefit payments during 2012 and 2011?
Context: the 2011 of benefit payments is 3561 ; the 2011 of expected subsidy receipts is 115 ; the 2011 of net benefit payments is 3446 ; the 2012 of benefit payments is 3994 ; the 2012 of expected subsidy receipts is 140 ; the 2012 of net benefit payments is 3854 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values of net benefit payments .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Benefit payments in 2011: $3,561
Expected subsidy receipts in 2011: $115
Net benefit payments in 2011: $3,446
Benefit payments in 2012: $3,994
Expected subsidy receipts in 2012: $140
Net benefit payments in 2012: $3,854
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 3446 from 3854 which gives subtract(3854, 3446),
The final logic expression is subtract(3854, 3446).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the amortization expense for the operating leases for facility and equipment from 2015 to 2014 in dollars
Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 .
### Output:
Logic: the change from one period to another is the difference between the 2 periods
The required values from the context for the question are:
Rental expenses under operating leases for 2015: $21
Rental expenses under operating leases for 2014: $22
Rental expenses under operating leases for 2013: $23
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21 from 22 which gives subtract(22, 21),
The final logic expression is subtract(22, 21).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the 2015's charge , what is the impact of the industrial gases 2013 americas segment concerning the total expenses?
Context: in fiscal year 2015 , we recognized an expense of $ 207.7 ( $ 153.2 after-tax , or $ .71 per share ) . the 2015 charges related to the segments as follows : $ 31.7 in industrial gases 2013 americas , $ 52.2 in industrial gases 2013 emea , $ 10.3 in industrial gases 2013 asia , $ 37.0 in industrial gases 2013 global , $ 27.6 in materials technologies , and $ 48.9 in corporate and other .
### Output:
Logic: it is the expense related to the industrial gases 2013 americas segment divided by the total charge , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2015 total expense: $207.7
2015 industrial gases 2013 americas segment: $31.7
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 31.7 by 207.7 which gives divide(31.7, 207.7)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(31.7, 207.7), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(31.7, 207.7), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average volatility for 2017?
Context: the volatility of 2017 is 20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % ) ; the volatility of 2016 is 18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % ) ; the volatility of 2015 is 15.41% ( 15.41 % ) - 16.04% ( 16.04 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of both percentages of 2017 divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2017 volatility range: 20.43% - 21.85%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 21.85% to 20.43% which gives add(21.85%, 20.43%)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(21.85%, 20.43%), const_2)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(21.85%, 20.43%), const_2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(21.85%, 20.43%), const_2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the percentage of stock options that were excluded from the computation due to its anti-dilutive effect?
Context: in millions the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2016 is 96.9 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2015 is 96.9 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2014 is 97.2 ; at december 31 , 2016 , 0.6 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of stocks that were excluded divided by the total number of weighted average diluted shares , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2016 0.6 million stock options
2016 weighted-average number of diluted shares: 96.9 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 0.6 by 96.9 which gives divide(0.6, 96.9)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(0.6, 96.9), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(0.6, 96.9), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the lowest beginning balance observed during 2014-2016?
Context: the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 506127 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 463018 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 223599 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value observed in this period .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2016 beginning balance: $506127
2015 beginning balance: $463018
2014 beginning balance: $223599
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_min(beginning balance, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the decrease of the cash perfomance bonds in the years of 2009 and 2010 in millions?
Context: ( in millions ) the cash performance bonds of 2010 is $ 3717.0 ; the cash performance bonds of 2009 is $ 5834.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between those two values , in millions .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2010 cash performance bonds: $3717.0 million
2009 cash performance bonds: $5834.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 5834.6 from 3717.0 which gives subtract(3717.0, 5834.6),
The final logic expression is subtract(3717.0, 5834.6).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation of the additions during 2005 and 2006 , in thousands of dollars?
Context: balance december 31 2004 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 595338 is 83656 ; balance december 31 2004 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 595338 is 89564 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those addition values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2005: Not provided (Possible error in the provided context)
2006: Not provided (Possible error in the provided context)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 83656 from 89564 which gives subtract(89564, 83656),
The final logic expression is subtract(89564, 83656).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the ratio of the shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle to the 2006 performance plan issued in 2011
Context: during 2011 , the company issued approximately 1.2 million shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 0.3 million shares related to a 2006 performance plan .
### Output:
Logic: in 2011 the company issued 4 shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle to the per share of the 2006 performance plan
The required values from the context for the question are:
1.2 million (shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan)
0.3 million (shares related to a 2006 performance plan)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1.2 by 0.3 which gives divide(1.2, 0.3),
The final logic expression is divide(1.2, 0.3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the credit spread between 2008 and 2009 , in millions of dollars?
Context: ( in millions ) the december 31 2009 of 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread is $ 39 ; ( in millions ) the december 31 2008 of 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread is $ 37 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between the 2008's credit spread and the 2009's credit spread .
The required values from the context for the question are:
$ 39 (credit spread for December 31, 2009)
$ 37 (credit spread for December 31, 2008)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 37 from 39 which gives subtract(39, 37),
The final logic expression is subtract(39, 37).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the average operating loss?
Context: the operating loss of 2017 is -170.6 ( 170.6 ) ; the operating loss of 2016 is -87.6 ( 87.6 ) ; the operating loss of 2015 is -86.5 ( 86.5 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all operating loss divided by three ( the sum of the years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
-170.6 (operating loss of 2017)
-87.6 (operating loss of 2016)
-86.5 (operating loss of 2015)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(operating loss, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the interest expense during 2012 and 2013?
Context: the interest expense of 2014 is $ 125.1 ; the interest expense of 2013 is $ 141.8 ; the interest expense of 2012 is $ 123.7 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the total expenses in 2013 divided by the 2012's then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
$ 141.8 (interest expense of 2013)
$ 123.7 (interest expense of 2012)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 141.8 by 123.7 which gives divide(141.8, 123.7)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(141.8, 123.7), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(141.8, 123.7), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(141.8, 123.7), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth , in a percentage , of the consolidated net sales from 2005 to 2007?
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 9164 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005 is $ 9037 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 20142006 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2006 20142005 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 .
### Output:
Logic: in line 17 it said the percentage of total segmented sales relative to consolidated net sales . you take this percentage and multiple it by the segmented net sales to get the consolidated net sales . then you must take these two products and subtract them from each other . this product is then divided by the the consolidated net sales in 2005 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment Net Sales 2007: $10014
Segment Net Sales 2006: $9164
Segment Net Sales 2005: $9037
Net Sales 2007: 27% of Consolidated
Net Sales 2006: 21% of Consolidated
Net Sales 2005: 26% of Consolidated
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 9037 by 26% which gives multiply(9037, 26%)
step 2: multiply 10014 by 27% which gives multiply(10014, 27%)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%))
step 4: multiply 9037 by 26% which gives multiply(9037, 26%)
step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%)), multiply(9037, 26%))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%)), multiply(9037, 26%)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%)), multiply(9037, 26%)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is going to be the matured value of the eurobond issued in 2013 , in millions?
Context: additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the original $ 397 calculated in the compound interest formula , in which 2% is going to be the interest and 7 is going to be the period ( 2020-2013 ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Eurobond 2013: $397
Interest: 2.0%
Maturity Period: 7 years
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 397 by exp(add(const_1, 2.0%), 7) which gives multiply(397, exp(add(const_1, 2.0%), 7)),
The final logic expression is multiply(397, exp(add(const_1, 2.0%), 7)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of net sales was the consumer packaging segment in 2018?
Context: ( in millions ) the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2018 is $ 16285.1 ; the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2017 is $ 14859.7 ; the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2016 is $ 14171.8 ; our consumer packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 838.9 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 7291.4 million from $ 6452.5 million in fiscal 2017 .
### Output:
Logic: in line 36 , it gives us the amount of of net sales produced by the consumer packaging segment . to find the answer you take net sales subtract that by the number given in line 36 . then divide the solution by net sales .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net Sales 2018: $16285.1
Consumer Packaging Segment 2018: $7291.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 7291.4 from 16285.1 which gives subtract(16285.1, 7291.4)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 16285.1 which gives divide(subtract(16285.1, 7291.4), 16285.1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(16285.1, 7291.4), 16285.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(16285.1, 7291.4), 16285.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is due after 2023?
Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 17 ; the 2020 of amount is 15 ; the 2021 of amount is 12 ; the 2022 of amount is 11 ; the 2023 of amount is 6 ; the thereafter of amount is 80 ;
### Output:
Logic: from here you need to take the total due after 2023 , or 80 , and divide it by the total or 141 to get 56.7%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount due after 2023: 80
Total due: 141
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 17 to 15 which gives add(17, 15)
step 2: add 12 to 11 which gives add(12, 11)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11))
step 4: add 6 to 80 which gives add(6, 80)
step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), add(6, 80))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), add(6, 80)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), add(6, 80)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average of the principal payments scheduled from 2007 to 2011
Context: the total of total ( in $ millions ) is 3498 ; the thereafter ( 1 ) of total ( in $ millions ) is 1590 ;
### Output:
Logic: the average of the 5 years
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total Principal Payments: 3498
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1590 from 3498 which gives subtract(3498, 1590)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to const_5 which gives add(subtract(3498, 1590), const_5)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_2 which gives divide(add(subtract(3498, 1590), const_5), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(subtract(3498, 1590), const_5), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage reduction in the shut down related costs as presented to the dod
Context: the company has submitted a revised proposal to address the concerns of the dcaa and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $ 271 million . the defense contract audit agency ( 201cdcaa 201d ) , a dod agency , prepared an initial audit report on the company 2019s cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $ 310 million , which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the dcaa to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $ 25 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , of the costs submitted by the company .
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from the current to most recent divide by the most recent
The required values from the context for the question are:
Revised Proposal: $271 million
Initial Proposal: $310 million
Questioned Costs: $25 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 310 from 271 which gives subtract(271, 310)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 310 which gives divide(subtract(271, 310), 310)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(271, 310), 310), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(271, 310), 310), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 292017 what was the percent of the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities to the net cash provided by operating activities
Context: years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 292018 is -18607 ( 18607 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 302017 is -8475 ( 8475 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 312016 is -5739 ( 5739 ) ; years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 292018 is $ 29432 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 302017 is $ 22110 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 312016 is $ 21808 ;
### Output:
Logic: as of december 292017 38.3% of net cash provided by operating activities was used for the ( used for ) financing activities
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net Cash Used for Financing 2017: -8475
Net Cash Provided by Operating 2017: $22110
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 8475 by 22110 which gives divide(8475, 22110)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(8475, 22110), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(8475, 22110), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the original value of patents and licenses , in dollars?
Context: december 31 2015 the patents and licenses of gross carrying amount is 110 ; the patents and licenses of accumulated amortization is -98 ( 98 ) ; december 31 , 2015 carrying amount accumulated amortization .
### Output:
Logic: the original value is calculated based upon the gross carrying amount formula , in which the carrying amount is equal to the original value mines the amortization/depreciation costs .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Gross Carrying Amount 2015: 110
Accumulated Amortization 2015: -98
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 110 to 98 which gives add(110, 98),
The final logic expression is add(110, 98).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2008-2010 , what is the value of the average deductions?\\n
Context: balance december 31 2008 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 846258 is -11869 ( 11869 ) ; balance december 31 2008 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 846258 is -11144 ( 11144 ) ; balance december 31 2008 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 846258 is -21796 ( 21796 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all deductions divided by the sum of the years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deductions 2008: -11869
Deductions 2009: -11144
Deductions 2010: -21796
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 11869 to 11144 which gives add(11869, 11144)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 21796 which gives add(add(11869, 11144), 21796)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(11869, 11144), 21796), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(11869, 11144), 21796), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2015 , what is the highest revenue?
Context: the 2015 of first quarter is 22% ( 22 % ) ; the 2015 of second quarter is 25% ( 25 % ) ; the 2015 of third quarter is 26% ( 26 % ) ; the 2015 of fourth quarter is 27% ( 27 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value of revenue for that year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2015 Q1 Revenue: 22%
2015 Q2 Revenue: 25%
2015 Q3 Revenue: 26%
2015 Q4 Revenue: 27%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply table_max(2015, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_max(2015, none), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(table_max(2015, none), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the highest initial balance observed during 2015-2017?
Context: the balance at january 1 of 2017 is 1053027 ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is 1045640 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is 1149309 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value for this period .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance January 1, 2017: 1053027
Balance January 1, 2016: 1045640
Balance January 1, 2015: 1149309
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_max(balance at january 1, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of 2017 what was the total annual fuel expenses starting with 2015 in millions
Context: year the 2016 of gallons is 4347 ; the 2016 of average priceper gallon is 1.42 ; the 2016 of aircraft fuelexpense is 6180 ; the 2016 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 17.7% ( 17.7 % ) ; year the 2017 of gallons is 4352 ; the 2017 of average priceper gallon is $ 1.73 ; the 2017 of aircraft fuelexpense is $ 7510 ; the 2017 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 19.7% ( 19.7 % ) ; year the 2015 of gallons is 4323 ; the 2015 of average priceper gallon is 1.72 ; the 2015 of aircraft fuelexpense is 7456 ; the 2015 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 21.4% ( 21.4 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the total is the sum of the expenses for each year
The required values from the context for the question are:
2015 aircraft fuel expense: 7456
2016 aircraft fuel expense: 6180
2017 aircraft fuel expense: 7510
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 6180 to 7510 which gives add(6180, 7510)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 7456 which gives add(add(6180, 7510), 7456),
The final logic expression is add(add(6180, 7510), 7456).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2012 and 2013 , what is the variation observed in the operating leases?
Context: the 2012 of total is 50099 ; the 2012 of capital leases is 1819 ; the 2012 of operating leases is 9271 ; the 2012 of sponsorship licensing & other is 39009 ; the 2013 of total is 50012 ; the 2013 of capital leases is 36837 ; the 2013 of operating leases is 7062 ; the 2013 of sponsorship licensing & other is 6113 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between each year's operating leases .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2012 operating leases: 9271
2013 operating leases: 7062
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 7062 from 9271 which gives subtract(9271, 7062),
The final logic expression is subtract(9271, 7062).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2011-2013 , what is the average value for settlements?
Context: unrecognized tax benefits the settlements of 2013 is -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ; the settlements of 2012 is -11.0 ( 11.0 ) ; the settlements of 2011 is -15.6 ( 15.6 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sun of all settlements divided by three ( number of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2011 settlements: -15.6
2012 settlements: -11.0
2013 settlements: -1.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(settlements, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables in relation with the total net of all collateral in 2018?
Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a ) of 2018 is -15322 ( 15322 ) ; the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a ) of 2017 is -16108 ( 16108 ) ; december 31 ( in millions ) the total net of all collateral of 2018 is $ 38891 ; the total net of all collateral of 2017 is $ 40415 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the division between the liquid securities and other cash collateral and total net of all collateral , in 2018 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2018 liquid securities and other cash collateral: -15322
2018 total net of all collateral: 38891
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 15322 by 38891 which gives divide(15322, 38891)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(15322, 38891), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(15322, 38891), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of the company's net assets are considered long-term assets?
Context: current assets the long-term assets of $ 1922 is 253 ; current assets the net assets acquired of $ 1922 is $ 10000 ; the recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed , based upon their fair values as of july 1 , 2015 are set forth below: .
### Output:
Logic: long term assets divided by net assets
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term assets: 253
Net assets: 10000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 253 by 10000 which gives divide(253, 10000)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(253, 10000), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(253, 10000), 100).
### End |