text
stringlengths 601
2.62k
|
|---|
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total amount of principle payment paid from 2008 to 2011?
Context: the term loan calls for quarterly principal payments of $ 5 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2008 and increasing to $ 10 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2010 and $ 15 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2011 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the total amount of payments one must check line 7 and added up all the years from 2008 to 2011 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Quarterly principal payments starting August 31, 2008: $5 million
Quarterly principal payments starting August 31, 2010: $10 million
Quarterly principal payments starting August 31, 2011: $15 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10)
step 2: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)),
The final logic expression is add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the fair value of options granted in 2008 , what is going to be its estimated future value when the expected life ends?
Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2008 is $ 18.47 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2007 is $ 33.81 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006 is $ 20.01 ; the dividend yield of 2008 is 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2007 is 0.76% ( 0.76 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2006 is 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ; the expected life of options in years of 2008 is 6.0 ; the expected life of options in years of 2007 is 6.0 ; the expected life of options in years of 2006 is 6.3 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the future value formula , in which $ 1847 is the present value , 3.75% is the interest rate and 6 years is the period .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Weighted average fair value of options granted 2008: $18.47
Dividend yield 2008: 3.75%
Expected life of options 2008: 6.0 years
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 18.47 by exp(add(const_1, 3.75%), const_6) which gives multiply(18.47, exp(add(const_1, 3.75%), const_6)),
The final logic expression is multiply(18.47, exp(add(const_1, 3.75%), const_6)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what are the average cost of accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2016 and 2017?
Context: the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2017 is -29191247 ( 29191247 ) ; the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2016 is -26247062 ( 26247062 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for both years divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization 2017: -29191247
Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization 2016: -26247062
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2018 , how many approximate shares would have been held for the entire year to pay the approximate $ 320 in dividends over the 12 months?
Context: on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) had declared a common stock cash dividend of $ 0.21 per share , payable on march 15 , 2018 to holders of record as of the close of business on march 1 , 2018 . assuming we pay a quarterly dividend of $ 0.21 per share and there is no significant change in the number of outstanding shares as of december 31 , 2017 , we would expect to pay approximately $ 320.0 over the next twelve months. .
### Output:
Logic: quarterly payments = 4 payments per year
The required values from the context for the question are:
Dividend per share declared on February 14, 2018: $0.21
Total expected dividend payment over 12 months: $320.0
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 0.21 by const_4 which gives multiply(0.21, const_4)
step 2: divide 320 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(320, multiply(0.21, const_4)),
The final logic expression is divide(320, multiply(0.21, const_4)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much is the goodwill worth in 2016 if the intangible assets are worth $ 31.1 million?
Context: the goodwill acquired as part of acquisition of 2017 is 2014 ; the goodwill acquired as part of acquisition of 2016 is 84159 ; note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .
### Output:
Logic: in the first line , it says that the goodwill and intangibles assets for 2016 was $ 94.4 million this means that if the intangible assets was $ 31.3 million . therefore , the goodwill will be 63.1 million
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill 2016: $94.4 million
Intangible assets 2016: $31.3 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 31.3 from 94.4 which gives subtract(94.4, 31.3),
The final logic expression is subtract(94.4, 31.3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much percentage has long-term debt gone down from 2004 to 2008?
Context: 2004 the 2008 of $ 244.5 is $ 0.9 ; notes to consolidated financial statements ( dollars in millions , except per share amounts ) long-term debt maturing over the next five years and thereafter is as follows: .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage decrease you need to subtract 2004 by 2008 to get 243.6 million . then you take this and divide by 2004 which will give you 99.6%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term debt in 2008: $0.9 million
Long-term debt in 2004: $244.5 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 0.9 from 244.5 which gives subtract(244.5, 0.9)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 244.5 which gives divide(subtract(244.5, 0.9), 244.5)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(244.5, 0.9), 244.5), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(244.5, 0.9), 244.5), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percent of the remaining purchase capacity of the october 2015 compared to the authorized
Context: 12 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . as of december 31 , 2015 , the october 2015 repurchase program had remaining authorized purchase capacity of $ 855.5 million . in october 2015 , our board of directors added $ 900.0 million to the existing share repurchase authorization , which now extends through december 31 , 2017 .
### Output:
Logic: the percent of the remainder to the authorized , you divide the remainder by the authorized
The required values from the context for the question are:
Remaining authorized purchase capacity as of December 31, 2015: $855.5 million
Added amount to share repurchase authorization in October 2015: $900.0 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 855.5 by 900.0 which gives divide(855.5, 900.0)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(855.5, 900.0), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(855.5, 900.0), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: if the company were to buy the remaining securities at the average price of $ 34.92 , what would be the total payments from the company?
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) is 1765510 ; the total of weighted-average exerciseprice of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b ) is $ 34.92 ; the total of number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 7927210 ; the total of is -1 ( 1 ) ; plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders : 1765510 $ 34.92 7927210 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders : 2014 2014 2014 .
### Output:
Logic: the payment of the remaining securities can be found by multiplying the number of remaining securities at the average price they are bought .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance: 7927210
Average price: $34.92
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 7927210 by 34.92 which gives multiply(7927210, 34.92),
The final logic expression is multiply(7927210, 34.92).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the weighted average fair value of options , how many shares vested in 2004?
Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006 is $ 20.01 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2005 is $ 9.48 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2004 is $ 7.28 ; the total fair value of shares vested during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 was $ 9413 , $ 8249 , and $ 6418 respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the total fair value of options that vested in 2004 divided by its weighted average fair value also in 2004 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Weighted average fair value of options granted in 2004: $7.28
Total fair value of shares vested in 2004: $6418
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 6418 by 7.28 which gives divide(6418, 7.28),
The final logic expression is divide(6418, 7.28).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 3946111 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 34.67 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 3608527 ;
### Output:
Logic: the total is the sum of all securities for the plan
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights: 3946111
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans: 3608527
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 3946111 to 3608527 which gives add(3946111, 3608527),
The final logic expression is add(3946111, 3608527).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: by how much was the net cash from fiscal year ending in june 2007 below the three year average of net cash from operating activities?
Context: 2007 the net cash from operating activities of year ended june 30 2008 2007 is $ 181001 ; the net cash from operating activities of year ended june 30 2008 2007 is $ 174247 ; the net cash from operating activities of year ended june 30 2008 is $ 169438 ; the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : year ended june 30 cash provided by operations increased $ 6754 to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 as compared to $ 174247 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2007 .
### Output:
Logic: calculate the average by adding all the years' net cash and divide by 3 , then subtract the 2007 total from that number .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net cash from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2008: $181001
Net cash from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2007: $174247
Net cash from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2008 (again?): $169438
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 181001 to 174247 which gives add(181001, 174247)
step 2: add 169438 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(169438, add(181001, 174247))
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(169438, add(181001, 174247)), const_3)
step 4: subtract 174247 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(add(169438, add(181001, 174247)), const_3), 174247),
The final logic expression is subtract(divide(add(169438, add(181001, 174247)), const_3), 174247).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average consolidated rental expense from 2006 to 2008
Context: consolidated rental expense for the company 2019s office space , which is recognized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease , was approximately $ 42905 , $ 35614 and $ 31467 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the average consolidated rental expense from 2006 to 2008 was 36662
The required values from the context for the question are:
Consolidated rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2008: $42905
Consolidated rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2007: $35614
Consolidated rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2006: $31467
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 42905 to 35614 which gives add(42905, 35614)
step 2: add 31467 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(31467, add(42905, 35614))
step 3: add the expression of step 2 to const_3 which gives add(add(31467, add(42905, 35614)), const_3)
step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_2 which gives divide(add(add(31467, add(42905, 35614)), const_3), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(31467, add(42905, 35614)), const_3), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the net change in tax positions in 2010
Context: balance at january 1 2010 the increases in current period tax positions of $ 25621 is 907 ; balance at january 1 2010 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 25621 is -2740 ( 2740 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the net tax position is the sum of the increase and the decrease to determine whether the overall change was favorable or not
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increases in current period tax positions for January 1, 2010: $907
Decreases in current period tax positions for January 1, 2010: -$2740
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 907 to -2740 which gives add(907, -2740),
The final logic expression is add(907, -2740).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of outstanding shares among all issued shares?
Context: as of 30 september 2016 , 249 million shares were issued , with 217 million outstanding .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of outstanding shares divided by the number of shares issued in total , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Issued shares as of 30 September 2016: 249 million
Outstanding shares as of 30 September 2016: 217 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 217 by 249 which gives divide(217, 249)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(217, 249), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(217, 249), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the estimated average return for the s&p financial index and the s&p 500 index in the firs year of the investment of $ 100?
Context: december 31 ( in dollars ) the s&p financial index of 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p financial index of 2014 is 115.18 ; the s&p financial index of 2015 is 113.38 ; the s&p financial index of 2016 is 139.17 ; the s&p financial index of 2017 is 169.98 ; the s&p financial index of 2018 is 147.82 ; december 31 ( in dollars ) the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 113.68 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 115.24 ; the s&p 500 index of 2016 is 129.02 ; the s&p 500 index of 2017 is 157.17 ; the s&p 500 index of 2018 is 150.27 ; the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
### Output:
Logic: its the average of the percentual return provided by each indice during the years 2013 and 2014 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
S&P Financial Index in 2013: 100.00
S&P Financial Index in 2014: 115.18
S&P 500 Index in 2013: 100.00
S&P 500 Index in 2014: 113.68
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 115.18 by 100 which gives divide(115.18, 100)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1)
step 3: divide 113.68 by 100 which gives divide(113.68, 100)
step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)
step 5: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1))
step 6: divide the expression of step 5 by const_2 which gives divide(add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)), const_2)
step 7: multiply the expression of step 6 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)), const_2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)), const_2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the ratio of perfomance shares as a percent of the total number of granted shares?
Context: the outstanding at december 31 2016 of number of shares is 1820578 ; the outstanding at december 31 2016 of weightedaveragegrant datefair value is $ 98 ; in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the granted of number of shares is 650942 ; the granted of weightedaveragegrant datefair value is 129 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the division of the number of perfomance shares ( 203298 ) by the total number of granted shares ( 650942 ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of performance shares: 203298
Total number of granted shares: 650942
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 203298 by 650942 which gives divide(203298, 650942)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(203298, 650942), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(203298, 650942), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the ratio between the value of vehicles and buildings and improvements?
Context: buildings and improvements the vehicles of 39 is 5 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the vehicles divided by the value of the buildings and improvements .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Value of vehicles: 5
Value of buildings and improvements: 39
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 5 by 39 which gives divide(5, 39),
The final logic expression is divide(5, 39).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average expected dividend yield during 2008-2010?
Context: the expected dividend yield of 2010 is 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) ; the expected dividend yield of 2009 is 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) ; the expected dividend yield of 2008 is 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all expected dividends yield divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected dividend yield of 2010: 0.3%
Expected dividend yield of 2009: 0.4%
Expected dividend yield of 2008: 0.3%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply table_average(expected dividend yield, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(expected dividend yield, none), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(expected dividend yield, none), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what would the purchase obligations and other be for payments before the period be if they included the multiemployer pension plan?
Context: ( in millions ) the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period total is 2210.5 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2019 is 1676.6 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2020and 2021 is 224.1 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2022and 2023 is 114.9 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period thereafter is 194.9 ; ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 247.8 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2018 due to lack of definite payout terms for certain of the obligations .
### Output:
Logic: in line 19 , it says that they did not include the pension plan . to find out what the cost would be if they included the pension plan one needs to add 247.8 ( given in line 19 ) and 2210.5 ( given in the table ) which will give you $ 2458.3 million
The required values from the context for the question are:
Purchase obligations and other (total): 2210.5
Excluded multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities: $247.8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 247.8 to 2210.5 which gives add(247.8, 2210.5),
The final logic expression is add(247.8, 2210.5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2006 , what is the percentual fluctuation of the return provided by s&p 500 and the one provided by old peer group?
Context: the s&p 500 of 2006 is 115.80 ; the s&p 500 of 2007 is 122.16 ; the s&p 500 of 2008 is 76.96 ; the s&p 500 of 2009 is 97.33 ; the s&p 500 of 2010 is 111.99 ; the old peer group of 2006 is 155.58 ; the old peer group of 2007 is 190.78 ; the old peer group of 2008 is 72.25 ; the old peer group of 2009 is 76.11 ; the old peer group of 2010 is 87.61 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 .
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between the return's percentage of both s&p 500 ( 15.8% ) and old peer group ( 55.58% )
The required values from the context for the question are:
S&P 500 return in 2006: 115.80
Old peer group return in 2006: 155.58
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 115.80 which gives subtract(115.80, 100)
step 2: subtract 100 from 155.58 which gives subtract(155.58, 100)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2013 , what was the percentual increase in the actual return on assets compared with the expected return?
Context: for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million .
### Output:
Logic: it is the actual return divided by the expected return , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Actual return on assets in fiscal 2013: $74 million
Expected return on assets in fiscal 2013: $64 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 74 by 64 which gives divide(74, 64)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(74, 64), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(74, 64), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(74, 64), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what are the percentage of the acquisition of westgate mall , shaw 2019s plaza , and several parcels of land in the investing activities?\\n
Context: we used cash of $ 154.3 million during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2004 in investing activities , including the following : 2022 $ 101.7 million for our acquisition of westgate mall , shaw 2019s plaza and several parcels of land , 2022 capital expenditures of $ 59.2 million for development and redevelopment of properties including santana row , 2022 maintenance capital expenditures of approximately $ 36.9 million , 2022 $ 9.4 million capital contribution to a real estate partnership , and 2022 an additional $ 3.2 million net advance under an existing mortgage note receivable ; offset by 2022 $ 41.8 million in net sale proceeds from the sale of properties , and .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of that acquisition divided by the total investing activities value , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash used during the twelve months ended December 31, 2004: $154.3 million
Acquisition of Westgate Mall, Shaw 2019s Plaza and several parcels of land: $101.7 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 101.7 by 154.3 which gives divide(101.7, 154.3)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(101.7, 154.3), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(101.7, 154.3), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the decrease observed in the high trading stock prices in the first and second quarters in 2015?
Context: quarter the first of 2015 high is $ 17.10 ; the first of 2015 low is $ 12.65 ; the first of 2015 dividend is $ 0.03 ; the first of 2015 high is $ 12.97 ; the first of 2015 low is $ 9.82 ; the first of dividend is $ 0.03 ; quarter the second of 2015 high is 14.29 ; the second of 2015 low is 11.15 ; the second of 2015 dividend is 0.03 ; the second of 2015 high is 15.18 ; the second of 2015 low is 12.34 ; the second of dividend is 0.03 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those two prices .
The required values from the context for the question are:
First quarter 2015 high trading stock price: $17.10
Second quarter 2015 high trading stock price: 14.29
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 14.29 from 17.10 which gives subtract(17.10, 14.29),
The final logic expression is subtract(17.10, 14.29).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual decline of the deductions during 2007 and 2008?
Context: balance december 31 2006 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 740507 is -80258 ( 80258 ) ; balance december 31 2006 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 740507 is -11766 ( 11766 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual variation of the value of the deduction , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value of the final value , then dividing by the initial value and turning it into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deductions during period 2014 (from balance December 31, 2006): $740507
Disposition and retirements of property 2014 (from balance December 31, 2006): -80258
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 80258 from 11766 which gives subtract(11766, 80258)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 80258 which gives divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate of the ventas stock as of 12/31/2003
Context: the ventas of 12/31/2002 is $ 100 ; the ventas of 12/31/2003 is $ 206 ; the ventas of 12/31/2004 is $ 270 ; the ventas of 12/31/2005 is $ 331 ; the ventas of 12/31/2006 is $ 457 ; the ventas of 12/31/2007 is $ 512 ;
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change from year to year divided by the original year amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Ventas stock value as of 12/31/2002: $100
Ventas stock value as of 12/31/2003: $206
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_100 from 206 which gives subtract(206, const_100)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(206, const_100), const_100)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(206, const_100), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(206, const_100), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage that net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased from 2008 to 2009?
Context: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer one must subtract the totals of the two years and then take that answer and divide it by the total for 2008 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from 2008 to 2009: $28.9 million
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in fiscal 2008: $8.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 8.1 from 28.9 which gives subtract(28.9, 8.1)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 8.1 which gives divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the fluctuation between the lowest and average operating margin?
Context: years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the operating margin of 2014 is 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the average and the minimum value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
operating margin of 2014: 21.0%
operating margin of 2013: 19.8%
operating margin of 2012: 19.6%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract table_min(operating margin, none) from table_average(operating margin, none) which gives subtract(table_average(operating margin, none), table_min(operating margin, none))
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(table_average(operating margin, none), table_min(operating margin, none)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(table_average(operating margin, none), table_min(operating margin, none)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of buildings are owned in the united states by the company?
Context: ( square feet in thousands ) the owned of united states is 4530 ; the owned of other countries is 2417 ; the owned of total is 6947 ; ( square feet in thousands ) the leased of united states is 1037 ; the leased of other countries is 1341 ; the leased of total is 2378 ; ( square feet in thousands ) the total of united states is 5567 ; the total of other countries is 3758 ; the total of total is 9325 ; because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of buildings owned by the company in the u.s . one must divide the buildings owned in the u.s . by the total amount of buildings .
The required values from the context for the question are:
owned in the United States: 4530 square feet (thousands)
total buildings in the United States: 5567 square feet (thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 4530 by 5567 which gives divide(4530, 5567)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4530, 5567), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4530, 5567), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the expenses of the 2013 charge , what were the impact of the severance and other benefits on the total value?
Context: the 2013 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 71.9 ; the 2013 charge of asset actions is $ 100.4 ; the 2013 charge of contract actions/other is $ 59.3 ; the 2013 charge of total is $ 231.6 ; 2013 plan during the fourth quarter of 2013 , we recorded an expense of $ 231.6 ( $ 157.9 after-tax , or $ .74 per share ) reflecting actions to better align our cost structure with current market conditions .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the severance and other benefits divided by the total expenses of the 2013 charge , then turned into a percentage to represent the impact .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2013 charge of severance and other benefits: $71.9 million
2013 charge of total: $231.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 71.9 by 231.6 which gives divide(71.9, 231.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(71.9, 231.6), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(71.9, 231.6), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual growth of the depreciation and amortization expenses during 2008 and 2009?
Context: balance december 31 2008 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 846258 is 103698 ; balance december 31 2008 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 846258 is 108261 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the depreciation and amortization expenses of 2009 divided by the 2009's then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
depreciation and amortization expense 2008: 103698 ($846258)
depreciation and amortization expense 2009: 108261 ($846258)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 108261 by 103698 which gives divide(108261, 103698)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(108261, 103698), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(108261, 103698), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(108261, 103698), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percent of the period month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) as part of the total of total number of shares ( or units ) purchased
Context: period the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( a ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased is 1119600 ; the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( b ) average price paid per share ( or unit ) is $ 34.52 ; the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( c ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 1119600 ; the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 285.3 ; period the total of ( a ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased is 3005500 ; the total of ( b ) average price paid per share ( or unit ) is $ 35.86 ; the total of ( c ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 3005500 ; the total of ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 216.2 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent of the period month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) as part of the total of total number of shares ( or units ) purchased was 37.3 of the total amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
month #1 (October 1, 2014 - October 31, 2005) total number of shares purchased: 1119600
total number of shares purchased: 3005500
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1119600 by 3005500 which gives divide(1119600, 3005500)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1119600, 3005500), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1119600, 3005500), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the global rolled products' atoi concerning the total atoi in 2016?
Context: the atoi of 2016 is $ 269 ; the atoi of 2015 is $ 225 ; the atoi of 2014 is $ 224 ; atoi for all reportable segments totaled $ 1087 in 2016 , $ 986 in 2015 , and $ 983 in 2014 . global rolled products ( 1 ) .
### Output:
Logic: it is the atoi for the global rolled products divided by the atoi of all segments , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
atoi 2016: $269 million
total atoi for all segments 2016: $1087 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 269 by 1087 which gives divide(269, 1087)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(269, 1087), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(269, 1087), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2009 , what is the difference between the carrying value on consolidated balance sheets for derivative receivables and derivative payables , in millions?
Context: december 31 2009 ( in millions ) the carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative receivables is $ 80210 ; the carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative payables is $ 60125 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the variation between each carrying value on consolidated balance sheets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative receivables 2009: $80210 million
carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative payables 2009: $60125 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 60125 from 80210 which gives subtract(80210, 60125),
The final logic expression is subtract(80210, 60125).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: using the value of the undivided interest held by investors and retained by upri at december 31 , 2009 as a proxy for ar balance , what was the average receivable turnover in 2009?\\n\\n[14] : at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .
Context: the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: total amount collected during 2009 divided by year end balance = turnover
The required values from the context for the question are:
Value of undivided interest held by investors at December 31, 2009: $817 million
Value of undivided interest held by investors at December 31, 2008: $1015 million
Interest retained by UPRI at December 31, 2009: $417 million
Interest retained by UPRI at December 31, 2008: $431 million
Amount collected during 2009: $13.8 billion
Amount collected during 2008: $17.8 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 13.8 by const_1000 which gives multiply(13.8, const_1000)
step 2: add 417 to 817 which gives add(417, 817)
step 3: divide the expression of step 1 by the expression of step 2 which gives divide(multiply(13.8, const_1000), add(417, 817)),
The final logic expression is divide(multiply(13.8, const_1000), add(417, 817)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: did consolidated net sales grow from 2007 to 2009 , and what was the growth , in a percentage , from 2007 to 2009?
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 is $ 7963 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 10086 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 20142008 is ( 21 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2008 20142007 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 36% ( 36 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 33% ( 33 % ) in 2008 and 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 .
### Output:
Logic: in order to find out consolidated net sales , one must multiple the segmented net sales by the percentage given in line 4 . these numbers are subtracted by each other and the solution is divided by the lowest number . the final answer is then 6%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment net sales, 2009: $7963 million
Segment net sales, 2008: $10086 million
Segment net sales, 2007: $10014 million
Segment's share of consolidated net sales, 2009: 36%
Segment's share of consolidated net sales, 2008: 33%
Segment's share of consolidated net sales, 2007: 27%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 10014 by 27% which gives multiply(10014, 27%)
step 2: multiply 7963 by 36% which gives multiply(7963, 36%)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(7963, 36%), multiply(10014, 27%))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(7963, 36%), multiply(10014, 27%)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(7963, 36%), multiply(10014, 27%)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage growth in the total re-organization costs from 2012 to 2013
Context: the total reorganization items net of 2013 is $ 2640 ; the total reorganization items net of 2012 is $ 2179 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent is the most recent amount less the prior amount divided by the prior amount multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total reorganization items net, 2013: $2640 million
Total reorganization items net, 2012: $2179 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 2179 from 2640 which gives subtract(2640, 2179)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2179 which gives divide(subtract(2640, 2179), 2179)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2640, 2179), 2179), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2640, 2179), 2179), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2017 , what is the lowest projected benefit payment value?
Context: the 2017 of u.s . is $ 150.3 ; the 2017 of international is $ 45.7 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value of the projected benefit payment observed in that year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
U.S., 2017: $150.3 million
International, 2017: $45.7 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_min(2017, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average number of aso memberships?
Context: the aso of smart plans and other consumer membership is 277500 ; the aso of other commercial membership is 1364500 ; the aso of commercial medical membership is 1642000 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of both types of memberships , then divided by two to represent the average .
The required values from the context for the question are:
ASO of smart plans and other consumer membership: 277500
ASO of other commercial membership: 1364500
ASO of commercial medical membership: 1642000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 277500 to 1364500 which gives add(277500, 1364500)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(277500, 1364500), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(277500, 1364500), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total number of shares subject to outstanding awards from both 2004 and 2009
Context: the 2004 stock incentive plan of shares available for awards is - ; the 2004 stock incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards is 5923147 ; the 2009 global incentive plan of shares available for awards is 2322450 ; the 2009 global incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards is 2530454 ;
### Output:
Logic: the total number is the sum of all the amounts
The required values from the context for the question are:
2004 stock incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards: 5923147
2009 global incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards: 2530454
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 5923147 to 2530454 which gives add(5923147, 2530454),
The final logic expression is add(5923147, 2530454).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the amount of money represented by all the class b derivatives , in millions of dollars?
Context: rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 12536 ; the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 32 ; the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of exposure net of all collateral is 13925 ; the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 34 ; rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 6373 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the sum of the all the class b derivative receivables in 2018 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 rating equivalent exposure net, 2018: 12536 million
BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 exposure net, 2018: 13925 million
BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 rating equivalent exposure net, 2018: 6373 million
BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 exposure net, 2018: 7397 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 13925 to 7397 which gives add(13925, 7397),
The final logic expression is add(13925, 7397).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the increase observed in the research and development expenditures?
Context: our research and development ( "r&d" ) expenditures were approximately $ 48.3 million , $ 47.3 million and $ 45.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the expenditures in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
R&D expenditures, 2017: $48.3 million
R&D expenditures, 2016: $47.3 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 48.3 by 47.3 which gives divide(48.3, 47.3)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(48.3, 47.3), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(48.3, 47.3), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(48.3, 47.3), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the expected benefit payments during 2012 and 2013?
Context: 2010 the 2012 of $ 18181 is 21548 ; 2010 the 2013 of $ 18181 is 25513 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the expected benefit payment's value in 2013 divided by the 2012's , then transformed into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected benefit payments, 2012: $21548 (relative to base $18181)
Expected benefit payments, 2013: $25513 (relative to base $18181)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 25513 by 21548 which gives divide(25513, 21548)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(25513, 21548), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(25513, 21548), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(25513, 21548), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the change in the free cash flow from 2008 to 2009 in millions
Context: the free cash flow of 2009 is $ 602.0 ; the free cash flow of 2008 is $ 133.5 ; the free cash flow of 2007 is $ 374.9 ;
### Output:
Logic: the change is the difference between the two amounts
The required values from the context for the question are:
Free cash flow, 2009: $602.0 million
Free cash flow, 2008: $133.5 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 133.5 from 602.0 which gives subtract(602.0, 133.5),
The final logic expression is subtract(602.0, 133.5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2007-2008 , what was the increase observed in the expense related to all of the defined contribution plans?
Context: the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 35341 , $ 26996 and $ 43594 for 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the expense related to all of the defined contribution plans in 2008 divided by the 2007's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2008: $43594
2007: $26996
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 35341 by 26996 which gives divide(35341, 26996)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(35341, 26996), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(35341, 26996), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(35341, 26996), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the average interest expense?
Context: the interest expense of 2017 is $ 120.6 ; the interest expense of 2016 is $ 115.2 ; the interest expense of 2015 is $ 102.8 ; interest expense .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all interest expenses divided by three ( the sum of the years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2015: $102.8
2016: $115.2
2017: $120.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(interest expense, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2014 what was the income from continuing operations adjusted for diluting operations?
Context: the income from continuing operations of 2014 is $ 2.39 ; the income from continuing operations of 2013 is $ 2.07 ; the income from continuing operations of 2012 is $ 2.10 ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2014 is $ -0.04 ( 0.04 ) ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2013 is $ -0.01 ( 0.01 ) ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2012 is $ -0.09 ( 0.09 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the income from continuing operations in 2014 was given as 2.39 while the dilute operations included from continuing operations was 0.04 thus the adjusted income less dilute operations was 2.35
The required values from the context for the question are:
2014 income from continuing operations: $2.39
2014 income (loss) from discontinued operations net of tax: -$0.04
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 0.04 from 2.39 which gives subtract(2.39, 0.04),
The final logic expression is subtract(2.39, 0.04).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the combined change to the tax liabilities both current and long-term following the sfas 158 adoption adjustments
Context: the deferred taxes ( current ) of prior to application of sfas 158 is $ 191 ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of sfas 158 adoption adjustments is $ -28 ( 28 ) ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of after application of sfas 158 is $ 163 ; the deferred taxes ( long-term ) of prior to application of sfas 158 is $ 186 ; the deferred taxes ( long-term ) of sfas 158 adoption adjustments is $ 227 ; the deferred taxes ( long-term ) of after application of sfas 158 is $ 413 ;
### Output:
Logic: the combined amount in tax liability adjustment is the some of the current amount and the long term amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Current deferred taxes before SFAS 158: $191
Current deferred taxes SFAS 158 adjustments: -$28
Long-term deferred taxes before SFAS 158: $186
Long-term deferred taxes SFAS 158 adjustments: $227
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 28 by const_m1 which gives multiply(28, const_m1)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 227 which gives add(multiply(28, const_m1), 227),
The final logic expression is add(multiply(28, const_m1), 227).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average weighted-average useful life for all those intangible assets , in number of years?
Context: customer relationships the trademarks of 25 is 25 ; the trademarks of years is years ; customer relationships the completed technology/patents of 25 is 10 ; the completed technology/patents of years is years ; customer relationships the other of 25 is 25 ; the other of years is years ; intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all weighted-average useful lives divided by four ( number of intangible assets ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Customer relationships: 25 years
Completed technology/patents: 10 years
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 25 to 25 which gives add(25, 25)
step 2: add 25 to 10 which gives add(25, 10)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(25, 25), add(25, 10))
step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_4 which gives divide(add(add(25, 25), add(25, 10)), const_4),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(25, 25), add(25, 10)), const_4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 312008 what was the percent of the unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions allied had taken prior to the merger .
Context: as of december 31 , 2008 , $ 582.9 million of the $ 611.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions allied had taken prior to the merger .
### Output:
Logic: in this case the percent is the amount divide by the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2008
The required values from the context for the question are:
December 31, 2008 unrecognized tax benefits: $582.9 million
Total unrecognized tax benefits 2008: $611.9 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 582.9 by 611.9 which gives divide(582.9, 611.9)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(582.9, 611.9), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(582.9, 611.9), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average space of the warehouse in square feet
Context: the warehouses of approximate number is 16 ; the warehouses of approximate size in square feet is 500000 ;
### Output:
Logic: the average space of a warehouse was 31250
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of warehouses: 16
Total square feet: 500000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 500000 by 16 which gives divide(500000, 16),
The final logic expression is divide(500000, 16).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2005-2007 , what is the average fair value of shares vested , in millions?
Context: the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2005 vested shares fair value: $0.6 million
2006 vested shares fair value: $2.3 million
2007 vested shares fair value: $3.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 3.4 to 0.6 which gives add(3.4, 0.6)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 2.3 which gives add(add(3.4, 0.6), 2.3)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(3.4, 0.6), 2.3), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(3.4, 0.6), 2.3), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of assets for the acquisition of paypros was deductible for taxes?
Context: goodwill the customer-related intangible assets of $ 271577 is 147500 ; goodwill the contract-based intangible assets of $ 271577 is 31000 ; goodwill the acquired technology of $ 271577 is 10700 ; goodwill the fixed assets of $ 271577 is 1680 ; goodwill the other assets of $ 271577 is 4230 ; goodwill the total assets acquired of $ 271577 is 466687 ; the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of assets that are tax deductible one will nee to added all the intangible assets and technology acquisitions . then they will divide that answer by the total amount of assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Customer-related intangible assets: $147500
Contract-based intangible assets: $31000
Acquired technology: $10700
Total assets acquired: $466687
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 10700 to 31000 which gives add(10700, 31000)
step 2: add 147500 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(147500, add(10700, 31000))
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 466687 which gives divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in millions , what was the average loss from foreign currency translation from 2015-2017?
Context: ( in millions ) the foreign currency translation of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ -96.1 ( 96.1 ) ; the foreign currency translation of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ -139.6 ( 139.6 ) ; the foreign currency translation of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ -61.1 ( 61.1 ) ; the company classifies deferred financing costs as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the long-term debt liability on the consolidated balance sheets , except for deferred financing costs associated with revolving credit facilities which are presented as an asset , within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . accumulated other comprehensive loss the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders 2019 equity are as follows: .
### Output:
Logic: add all losses from foreign transactions and divide by the total number of years to get the average .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2015 foreign currency translation loss: -$61.1 million
2016 foreign currency translation loss: -$139.6 million
2017 foreign currency translation loss: -$96.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 96.1 to 139.6 which gives add(96.1, 139.6)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 61.1 which gives add(add(96.1, 139.6), 61.1)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(96.1, 139.6), 61.1), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(96.1, 139.6), 61.1), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what were the total net earnings year ended december 31 2013 in millions
Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 1st qtr is 44 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 2nd qtr is 57 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 3rd qtr is 69 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 4th qtr is 91 ;
### Output:
Logic: the total net earnings for the year is the sum of the quarterly earnings
The required values from the context for the question are:
2013 1st qtr net earnings: $44 million
2013 2nd qtr net earnings: $57 million
2013 3rd qtr net earnings: $69 million
2013 4th qtr net earnings: $91 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 44 to 57 which gives add(44, 57)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 69 which gives add(add(44, 57), 69),
The final logic expression is add(add(44, 57), 69).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total authorized the aggregate repurchase of common stock since february 2008 including the additional amount authorized in 2017 in billions
Context: ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 .
### Output:
Logic: the total amount is the sum of the amounts
The required values from the context for the question are:
Aggregate repurchase since February 2008: $3.9 billion
Increase authorized on July 17, 2017: $1.5 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 3.9 to 1.5 which gives add(3.9, 1.5),
The final logic expression is add(3.9, 1.5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 31 , 2009 what was the remaining percentage outstanding of the $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock as approved by the board?
Context: on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 , of which $ 1.43 billion had been repurchased as of december 31 , 2009 .
### Output:
Logic: the outstanding amount is the difference in the amount authorized and the amount acquired
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total authorized share repurchase program: $8 billion
Amount repurchased as of December 31, 2009: $1.43 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1.43 from 8 which gives subtract(8, 1.43)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 8 which gives divide(subtract(8, 1.43), 8)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(8, 1.43), 8), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(8, 1.43), 8), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is due in 2019?
Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 17 ; the 2020 of amount is 15 ; the 2021 of amount is 12 ; the 2022 of amount is 11 ; the 2023 of amount is 6 ; the thereafter of amount is 80 ;
### Output:
Logic: from here you need to take the amount due in 2019 or $ 17 and divide it by the total or 141 to get 12.1%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount due in 2019: $17
Total amount due (sum of all years): $141
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 17 to 15 which gives add(17, 15)
step 2: add 12 to 11 which gives add(12, 11)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11))
step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 80 which gives add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80)
step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2007 , how many shares belonged to the shareholders?
Context: on august 1 , 2007 the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.75 per share to be paid on september 14 , 2007 to shareholders of record on august 15 , 2007 . the company paid out a dividend in the amount of $ 162531 .
### Output:
Logic: if the company paid out $ 0.75 per share , then the number of shares of the stockholders is going to be the total amount of dividends paid ( $ 162531 ) divided by $ 0.75 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Dividend per share: $0.75
Total dividend paid: $162531
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 162531 by 0.75 which gives divide(162531, 0.75),
The final logic expression is divide(162531, 0.75).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the percentage of income from operations of discontinued operations concerning income from discontinued operations net of tax?
Context: the income from operations of discontinued operations of 2014 is .7 ; the income from operations of discontinued operations of 2013 is 3.6 ; the income from operations of discontinued operations of 2012 is 47.3 ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2014 is $ 4.6 ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2013 is $ -10.0 ( 10.0 ) ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2012 is $ 168.1 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the income from operations of discontinued operations divided by the total income from discontinued operations net of tax's , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Income from operations of discontinued operations in 2014: 0.7
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of tax in 2014: $4.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide .7 by 4.6 which gives divide(.7, 4.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(.7, 4.6), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(.7, 4.6), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the 2013 charge , what is the percentage of the asset actions on the total charge?
Context: the 2013 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 71.9 ; the 2013 charge of asset actions is $ 100.4 ; the 2013 charge of contract actions/ other is $ 59.3 ; the 2013 charge of total is $ 231.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the asset actions divided by the total charge , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2013 charge of asset actions: $100.4
2013 charge total: $231.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 100.4 by 231.6 which gives divide(100.4, 231.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(100.4, 231.6), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(100.4, 231.6), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of trademarks and patents , in number of years?\\n
Context: customer relationships the trademarks of 25 is 25 ; the trademarks of years is years ; customer relationships the completed technology/patents of 25 is 10 ; the completed technology/patents of years is years ; intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: .
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those weighted-average useful lives .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Weighted average useful lives of trademarks: 25 years
Weighted average useful lives of technology/patents: 10 years
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 10 from 25 which gives subtract(25, 10),
The final logic expression is subtract(25, 10).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total amount lost from the bond authorization to the withdrawn?
Context: the franklin kentucky distribution center of bond term is 30 years ; the franklin kentucky distribution center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 54.0 ; the franklin kentucky distribution center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 51.8 ; the macon georgia distribution center of bond term is 15 years ; the macon georgia distribution center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 58.0 ; the macon georgia distribution center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 49.9 ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of bond term is 10 years ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 78.0 ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 75.3 ; the tax abatement plans provide for reduction of real property taxes for specified time frames by legally transferring title to its real property in exchange for industrial revenue bonds . the tax abatement period extends through the term of the lease , which coincides with the maturity date of the bonds .
### Output:
Logic: to find out the amount of money lost we must compare the authorization to the withdraw of all 3 bonds . then once you find the difference of these bonds you will add together the differences to get $ 13 million
The required values from the context for the question are:
Franklin Kentucky distribution center authorized amount: $54.0 million
Franklin Kentucky distribution center drawn amount: $51.8 million
Macon Georgia distribution center authorized amount: $58.0 million
Macon Georgia distribution center drawn amount: $49.9 million
Brentwood Tennessee store support center authorized amount: $78.0 million
Brentwood Tennessee store support center drawn amount: $75.3 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 51.8 from 54.0 which gives subtract(54.0, 51.8)
step 2: subtract 75.3 from 78.0 which gives subtract(78.0, 75.3)
step 3: subtract 49.9 from 58.0 which gives subtract(58.0, 49.9)
step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9))
step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(subtract(54.0, 51.8), add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9))),
The final logic expression is add(subtract(54.0, 51.8), add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9))).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percent of the operating leases in 2007 as part of the total amount?
Context: contractual commitments the operating leases of total is $ 691 ; the operating leases of payment period 2007 is $ 191 ; the operating leases of payment period 2008 - 2009 is $ 205 ; the operating leases of payment period 2010 - 2011 is $ 106 ; the operating leases of payment period after 2011 is $ 189 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent is the 2007 amount divided by the total amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total of operating leases: $691
Operating leases payment for 2007: $191
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 191 by 691 which gives divide(191, 691)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(191, 691), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(191, 691), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of the future lease payments is has to be paid in 2009?
Context: the 2009 of operating leases is $ 22883 ; future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases . the total future minimum lease payments of operating leases is $ 67446 ;
### Output:
Logic: to figure out the percentage paid in 2009 , one must take the amount to be paid in 2009 and divide by the total amount to be paid .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Payment due in 2009 for operating leases: $22883
Total future minimum lease payments for operating leases: $67446
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 22883 by 67446 which gives divide(22883, 67446)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(22883, 67446), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(22883, 67446), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the firm's average sum of contractual principal , interest and fees in 2008 and 2009?
Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the outstanding balance ( a ) of 2009 is $ 103369 ; the outstanding balance ( a ) of 2008 is $ 118180 ; the table below provides additional information about these pur- chased credit-impaired consumer loans. . ( a ) represents the sum of contractual principal , interest and fees earned at the reporting date .
### Output:
Logic: add the two total sums from 2008 and 2009 and then divide by the total number of years ( 2 ) for the average .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Outstanding balance in 2009: $103369 million
Outstanding balance in 2008: $118180 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 103369 to 118180 which gives add(103369, 118180)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(103369, 118180), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(103369, 118180), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the decrease in the alumina production during 2014 and 2015 , in kmt?
Context: the alumina production ( kmt ) of 2015 is 15720 ; the alumina production ( kmt ) of 2014 is 16606 ; the alumina production ( kmt ) of 2013 is 16618 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those two production values during 2015 and 2014 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2015 alumina production: 15720 kmt
2014 alumina production: 16606 kmt
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 15720 from 16606 which gives subtract(16606, 15720),
The final logic expression is subtract(16606, 15720).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the highest adjusted ebitda observed?
Context: the adjusted ebitda of 2017 is -158.4 ( 158.4 ) ; the adjusted ebitda of 2016 is -68.1 ( 68.1 ) ; the adjusted ebitda of 2015 is -66.2 ( 66.2 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value of adjusted ebitda during these years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2017 adjusted ebitda: -158.4
2016 adjusted ebitda: -68.1
2015 adjusted ebitda: -66.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_max(adjusted ebitda, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the highest return for the second year of the investment?
Context: the hum of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 152 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 214 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 267 ; the hum of 12/31/2016 is $ 307 ; the hum of 12/31/2017 is $ 377 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is $ 132 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is $ 150 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is $ 153 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2016 is $ 171 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2017 is $ 208 ; the peer group of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 137 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 175 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 186 ; the peer group of 12/31/2016 is $ 188 ; the peer group of 12/31/2017 is $ 238 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value of the investment in the second year , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
hum of 12/31/2013: $152
hum of 12/31/2014: $214
s&p 500 of 12/31/2013: $132
s&p 500 of 12/31/2014: $150
peer group of 12/31/2013: $137
peer group of 12/31/2014: $175
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 214 which gives subtract(214, 100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(214, 100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(214, 100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percent of the long-term debt junior subordinated debt and at december 31 , 2009 compared to december 31 , 2008
Context: long-term debt at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 includes $ 19345 million and $ 24060 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt .
### Output:
Logic: the percent of the long-term debt junior subordinated debt and at december 31 , 2009 was equal to 80.4% of the december 31 , 2008 junior subordinated debt
The required values from the context for the question are:
December 31, 2009 junior subordinated debt: $19345 million
December 31, 2008 junior subordinated debt: $24060 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 19345 by 24060 which gives divide(19345, 24060)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(19345, 24060), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(19345, 24060), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed in the high and average foreign exchange contracts , in millions of dollars?
Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 high is $ 27.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 low is $ 7.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 average is $ 18.9 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Year ended June 30 2014 high: $27.4 million
Year ended June 30 2014 low: $7.4 million
Year ended June 30 2014 average: $18.9 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 18.9 from 27.4 which gives subtract(27.4, 18.9),
The final logic expression is subtract(27.4, 18.9).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of non-cancelable future minimum lease payments are current?
Context: fiscal years ending march 31 , the 2019 of operating leases ( in $ 000s ) is $ 2078 ; fiscal years ending march 31 , the total minimum lease payments of operating leases ( in $ 000s ) is $ 10089 ;
### Output:
Logic: current = due in 2019
The required values from the context for the question are:
Fiscal year 2019 operating leases: $2078 (in $000s)
Total minimum lease payments: $10089 (in $000s)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2078 by 10089 which gives divide(2078, 10089)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2078, 10089), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2078, 10089), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percent of the change in the dividend yield from 2011 to 2012
Context: the dividend yield of 2012 is 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2011 is 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2010 is 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the change in the percent is the change from the early period to the most recent divide by the early period
The required values from the context for the question are:
Dividend yield 2012: 3.2%
Dividend yield 2011: 2.7%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 2.7 from 3.2 which gives subtract(3.2, 2.7)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2.7 which gives divide(subtract(3.2, 2.7), 2.7)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(3.2, 2.7), 2.7), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(3.2, 2.7), 2.7), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the percentage of unproved properties among the total properties?
Context: the unproved properties of 2017 is 3710069 ; the unproved properties of 2016 is 3840126 ; the total of 2017 is 52555741 ; the total of 2016 is 49592091 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the capitalized costs related to unproved properties divided by the capitalized costs related to all properties , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unproved properties 2016: 3840126
Total 2016: 49592091
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 3840126 by 49592091 which gives divide(3840126, 49592091)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(3840126, 49592091), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(3840126, 49592091), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: taking into account the 2014 charge related to the businesses for a segment , what is the percentage of the merchant gases segment concerning all of them?
Context: the 2014 charge related to the businesses at the segment level as follows : $ 4.4 in merchant gases , $ 4.1 in tonnage gases , $ 2.4 in electronics and performance materials , and $ 1.8 in equipment and energy .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the merchant gases segment divided by the sum of all segments , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2014 charge in merchant gases: $4.4
2014 charge in tonnage gases: $4.1
2014 charge in electronics and performance materials: $2.4
2014 charge in equipment and energy: $1.8
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 4.4 to 4.1 which gives add(4.4, 4.1)
step 2: add 2.4 to 1.8 which gives add(2.4, 1.8)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8))
step 4: divide 4.4 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(4.4, add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8)))
step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4.4, add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8))), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4.4, add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8))), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage increase of total fair value of share awards vested from 2007 to 2009?
Context: the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage increase one must subtract the total fair value of share awards vested of 2009 by 2007's total fair value of share awards vested . then you will take this solution and divide it by 2007's total fair value of share awards vested
The required values from the context for the question are:
Fair value of share awards vested 2009: $6.2 million
Fair value of share awards vested 2008: $4.1 million
Fair value of share awards vested 2007: $1.7 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1.7 from 6.2 which gives subtract(6.2, 1.7)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1.7 which gives divide(subtract(6.2, 1.7), 1.7),
The final logic expression is divide(subtract(6.2, 1.7), 1.7).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the restructuring charges paid to those incurred in 2018
Context: asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems .
### Output:
Logic: the percent of the amount paid to the amount incurred is the division of the amount paid by the amount incurred
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net gain on business divestitures: $44.9 million
Paid during 2018 related to restructuring: $24.7 million
Incurred restructuring charges 2018: $26.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 24.7 by 26.4 which gives divide(24.7, 26.4)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(24.7, 26.4), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(24.7, 26.4), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: assuming a 120 day inventory turn , how of the receivables balance at december 31 , 2010 , was collected in q1 2011 in billions?
Context: the railroad collected approximately $ 18.8 billion and $ 16.3 billion of receivables during the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: 120 days = 4 months . 4 mos = 3 turns per year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Receivables collected during year ended December 31, 2011: $18.8 billion
Receivables collected during year ended December 31, 2010: $16.3 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 16.3 by const_3 which gives divide(16.3, const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(16.3, const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the fair value of ars investments between 2009 and 2008?
Context: the fair value december 31 2008 of significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) is $ 192 ; the fair value december 31 2009 of significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) is 180 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual decrease observed in the fair value of ars investments , which is calculated by subtracting the 2009's value of 2008 one , then dividing by the 2008 and turning it into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Fair value December 31, 2008 (Level 3): $192 million
Fair value December 31, 2009 (Level 3): $180 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 192 from 180 which gives subtract(180, 192)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 192 which gives divide(subtract(180, 192), 192)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(180, 192), 192), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(180, 192), 192), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation between the useful lives of the structures and machinery and equipment by the global rolled products segment?
Context: segment the global rolled products of structures is 31 ; the global rolled products of machinery and equipment is 21 ; the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the number of years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Useful lives of structures (Global Rolled Products): 31 years
Useful lives of machinery and equipment (Global Rolled Products): 21 years
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21 from 31 which gives subtract(31, 21),
The final logic expression is subtract(31, 21).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2017-2018 , what is the increase observed in payment amount per share?
Context: paymentdate the 2017 of amountper share is $ 1.49 ; the 2017 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 216 ; paymentdate the 2018 of amountper share is $ 1.90 ; the 2018 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 262 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the amount paid per share in 2018 divided by the 2017's , then transformed into a percentage to represent the increase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount per share 2017: $1.49
Total amount 2017: $216 million
Amount per share 2018: $1.90
Total amount 2018: $262 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1.90 by 1.49 which gives divide(1.90, 1.49)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1.90, 1.49), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1.90, 1.49), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1.90, 1.49), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: at the weighted average price given what is the value of the number of securities to be issued
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 1955024 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 36.06 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4078093 ;
### Output:
Logic: the value is the product of the number of shares and the price
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of securities to be issued: 1955024
Weighted-average exercise price: $36.06
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1955024 by 36.06 which gives multiply(1955024, 36.06),
The final logic expression is multiply(1955024, 36.06).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the variation between the fair value of the foreign exchange contracts and its high measured value-at-risk?
Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2013 high is $ 24.5 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2013 low is $ 19.1 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2013 average is $ 21.9 ; the fair value of those contracts as of june 30 , 2013 was approximately $ 4.6 million .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Foreign exchange contracts high (June 30, 2013): $24.5 million
Foreign exchange contracts low (June 30, 2013): $19.1 million
Fair value of contracts (June 30, 2013): $4.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 4.6 from 24.5 which gives subtract(24.5, 4.6),
The final logic expression is subtract(24.5, 4.6).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the refund received from the canadian tax authorities , in comparison with the total net cash income taxes paid in 2016?
Context: cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 10.4 million and $ 80.6 million , respectively . the 2016 net cash income taxes paid includes a refund of $ 46.2 million received from the canadian tax authorities .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the refund received divided by the total net cash income taxes , then turned into a percentage.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net cash paid for income taxes 2016: $10.4 million
Refund received from Canadian tax authorities: $46.2 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 46.2 by 80.6 which gives divide(46.2, 80.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(46.2, 80.6), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(46.2, 80.6), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed in the expected benefits payment in 2009 and 2010?
Context: 2009 the 2010 of $ 19766 is 18182 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the expected benefits payments for both years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected benefits payment 2009: $19766
Expected benefits payment 2010: $18182
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 18182 from 19766 which gives subtract(19766, 18182),
The final logic expression is subtract(19766, 18182).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of future annual commitments related to minimum quantities of purchased water having non-cancelable are due after 2023?
Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 65 ; the 2020 of amount is 65 ; the 2021 of amount is 65 ; the 2022 of amount is 64 ; the 2023 of amount is 57 ; the thereafter of amount is 641 ;
### Output:
Logic: the $ 957 above is the total amount . from here you need to take the total amount due "thereafter" or 641 and divide it by $ 957 to get 67% ( 641/957 = 67% )
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount due in 2019: $65
Amount due in 2020: $65
Amount due in 2021: $65
Amount due in 2022: $64
Amount due in 2023: $57
Amount due thereafter: $641
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 65 to 65 which gives add(65, 65)
step 2: add 65 to 64 which gives add(65, 64)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64))
step 4: add 57 to 641 which gives add(57, 641)
step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percent of the 2008 maturities as a part of the total maturities
Context: 2007 the 2008 of $ 130206 is 33117 ; 2007 the total maturities of $ 130206 is 2336989 ;
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divided by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
2008 maturities: $33117
Total maturities 2007: $2336989
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 33117 by 2336989 which gives divide(33117, 2336989)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(33117, 2336989), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(33117, 2336989), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the discrete ax benefit as a part of the balance at december 312013
Context: included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . balance at january 1 2011 the balance at december 31 2013 of $ 23788 is $ 13555 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage of a number is 2979 divide by the year end balance multiplied by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
Discrete tax benefit 2013: $2979
Balance at December 31, 2013: $13555
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2979 by 13555 which gives divide(2979, 13555)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2979, 13555), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2979, 13555), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of structures and machinery/equipment in the engineered products and solutions segment , in years?
Context: the engineered products and solutions of structures is 29 ; the engineered products and solutions of machinery and equipment is 17 ; the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the number of years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Engineered products and solutions of structures: 29 years
Engineered products and solutions of machinery and equipment: 17 years
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 17 from 29 which gives subtract(29, 17),
The final logic expression is subtract(29, 17).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase in the value of goodwill balances during 2008 and 2009?
Context: our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2009 were $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , compared to $ 5.6 billion and $ 779 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2008 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the 2009's goodwill divided by the 2008's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2009: $6.1 billion
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2008: $5.6 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 6.1 by 5.6 which gives divide(6.1, 5.6)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(6.1, 5.6), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(6.1, 5.6), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(6.1, 5.6), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the approximate customer penetration for the total regulated businesses?
Context: our regulated utilities own substantially all of the assets used by our regulated businesses . new jersey the total regulated businesses of operating revenues ( in millions ) $ 639.0 is $ 2564.4 ; the total regulated businesses of % ( % ) of total 24.9% ( 24.9 % ) is 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) ; the total regulated businesses of number of customers 639838 is 3158226 ; the total regulated businesses of % ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % ) is 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) ; the total regulated businesses of estimated population served ( in millions ) 2.5 is 11.4 ; the total regulated businesses of % ( % ) of total 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) is 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: customer penetration - customers divided by total population in those states
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total regulated businesses number of customers: 639838
Estimated population served by total regulated businesses: 11.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 11.4 by const_1000000 which gives multiply(11.4, const_1000000)
step 2: multiply 3158226 by the expression of step 1 which gives multiply(3158226, multiply(11.4, const_1000000))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(3158226, multiply(11.4, const_1000000)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(3158226, multiply(11.4, const_1000000)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering one year of investment , what is the variation between the return provided by arconic inc . and the one provided by s&p 500 aeindustrials index?
Context: as of december 31 , the arconic inc . of 2013 is $ 100 ; the arconic inc . of 2014 is $ 149.83 ; the arconic inc . of 2015 is $ 94.62 ; the arconic inc . of 2016 is $ 80.22 ; the arconic inc . of 2017 is $ 119.02 ; the arconic inc . of 2018 is $ 74.47 ; as of december 31 , the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2014 is 109.83 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2015 is 107.04 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2016 is 127.23 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2017 is 153.99 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2018 is 133.53 ; the graph assumes , in each case , an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the percentage of return of the initial $ 100 in both indices .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Arconic Inc. 2017: $119.02
Arconic Inc. 2016: $80.22
S&P 500 aeindustrials index 2017: 153.99
S&P 500 aeindustrials index 2016: 127.23
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 109.83 by 100 which gives divide(109.83, 100)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1)
step 3: divide 149.83 by 100 which gives divide(149.83, 100)
step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1)
step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the average price paid per share during november and december of 2013?
Context: period the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of average price paid per share is 98.18 ; the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is 664123417 ; period the december 2013 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 802930 ; the december 2013 of average price paid per share is 104.10 ; the december 2013 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 802930 ; the december 2013 of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is 580555202 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the average price paid per share during december divided by november's one , then transformed into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Average price paid per share, November 2013: 98.18
Average price paid per share, December 2013: 104.10
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 104.10 by 98.18 which gives divide(104.10, 98.18)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(104.10, 98.18), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(104.10, 98.18), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(104.10, 98.18), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much was the total operating expenses in 2016 in millions of dollars?
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the total of year-over-yearchange is $ 54.4 ; the total of change as apercentage of2015 expenses is 4% ( 4 % ) ; 2016 compared with 2015 operating expenses increased by $ 54.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015 .
### Output:
Logic: considering the increase of $ 544 as a 4% variation , the original value is calculated dividing $ 54.4 by its percentage , then adding the original value plus the variation .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increase in operating expenses 2016 compared to 2015: $54.4 million
Change as a percentage of 2015 expenses: 4%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 54.4 by 4% which gives divide(54.4, 4%)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 54.4 which gives add(divide(54.4, 4%), 54.4),
The final logic expression is add(divide(54.4, 4%), 54.4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average size of the 61 switching centers in square feet
Context: the call center of approximate number is 17 ; the call center of approximate size in square feet is 1300000 ; the switching centers of approximate number is 61 ; the switching centers of approximate size in square feet is 1300000 ;
### Output:
Logic: the average square feet is the total square feet divide by the number of locations
The required values from the context for the question are:
Switching centers approximate number: 61
Switching centers approximate size in total square feet: 1300000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1300000 by 61 which gives divide(1300000, 61),
The final logic expression is divide(1300000, 61).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much percent did the investor make on applied materials from the first 5 years compared to the 2016 to 2017 time period ? ( not including compound interest )
Context: the applied materials of 10/28/2012 is 100.00 ; the applied materials of 10/27/2013 is 171.03 ; the applied materials of 10/26/2014 is 207.01 ; the applied materials of 10/25/2015 is 165.34 ; the applied materials of 10/30/2016 is 293.64 ; the applied materials of 10/29/2017 is 586.91 ; applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders .
### Output:
Logic: to see the difference between the years one will need to calculate the total percentage change over those years . for the first 5 years its pretty easy because we started with $ 100 making it a 193% return . for the years 2016 to 2017 , one needs to subtract the starting price by the ending price and then divide that number by the starting price . this gives us a 99.9% return in 2016 to 2017 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Applied materials 10/28/2012: 100.00
Applied materials 10/30/2016: 293.64
Applied materials 10/29/2017: 586.91
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 293.64 from 586.91 which gives subtract(586.91, 293.64)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 293.64 which gives divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)
step 3: subtract const_100 from 293.64 which gives subtract(293.64, const_100)
step 4: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)),
The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in comparison to overall information technology sector , how much percentage would global payments have earned the investor .
Context: the may 31 2002 of global payments is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p 500 is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p information technology is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2003 of global payments is 94.20 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p 500 is 91.94 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p information technology is 94.48 ; the may 31 2004 of global payments is 129.77 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p 500 is 108.79 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p information technology is 115.24 ; the may 31 2005 of global payments is 193.30 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p 500 is 117.75 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p information technology is 116.29 ; the may 31 2006 of global payments is 260.35 ; the may 31 2006 of s&p 500 is 127.92 ; the may 31 2006 of s&p information technology is 117.14 ; the may 31 2007 of global payments is 224.24 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p 500 is 157.08 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p information technology is 144.11 ; global payments s&p 500 information technology .
### Output:
Logic: to calculate how much greater the return was for global payments , one must find the percentage gain of the s&p information technology and global payments . then one must subtract these two percentages to find the change between the two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Global payments May 31 2002: $100.00
Global payments May 31 2007: 224.24
S&P information technology May 31 2002: $100.00
S&P information technology May 31 2007: 144.11
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_100 from 144.11 which gives subtract(144.11, const_100)
step 2: subtract const_100 from 224.24 which gives subtract(224.24, const_100)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(224.24, const_100), subtract(144.11, const_100)),
The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(224.24, const_100), subtract(144.11, const_100)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: for net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 , how much was lost due to the decrease in net income?
Context: operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .
### Output:
Logic: to figure out the decrease in net income , one must take total change without net income and subtract it by the change between the years . this should give you $ 47.9 million .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net cash provided by operating activities 2013: $592.9 million
Increase in net cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012: $235.7 million
Improvement in working capital usage: $283.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 235.7 from 283.6 which gives subtract(283.6, 235.7),
The final logic expression is subtract(283.6, 235.7).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the decrease observed in the deferred purchase price receivable during 2015 and 2016?
Context: as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the deferred purchase price receivable was $ 83 and $ 249 , respectively , which was included in other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet .
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual variation between the deferred purchase price receivable in 2016 and 2015 , that is calculated by subtracting the final value of the initial value then dividing and turning it into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deferred purchase price receivable for 2016: $83
Deferred purchase price receivable for 2015: $249
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 249 from 83 which gives subtract(83, 249)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 249 which gives divide(subtract(83, 249), 249)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(83, 249), 249), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(83, 249), 249), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 31 , 2017 what was the ratio of restricted cash and marketable securities for the supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability to the total restricted cash and marketable securities
Context: accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability .
### Output:
Logic: the percent of the amount set aside from the total restricted cash and marketable securities to the to the total restricted cash and marketable securities was 50.6%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total restricted cash and marketable securities as of December 31, 2017: $141.1 million
Restricted cash and marketable securities supporting insurance programs as of December 31, 2017: $71.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 71.4 by 141.1 which gives divide(71.4, 141.1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(71.4, 141.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(71.4, 141.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: based on the table , what was the fair value price of global payments common stock given to active network stockholders?
Context: cash consideration paid to active network stockholders the fair value of global payments common stock issued to active network stockholders of $ 599497 is 572079 ; cash consideration paid to active network stockholders the total purchase consideration of $ 599497 is $ 1171576 ; we funded the cash portion of the total purchase consideration primarily by drawing on our revolving credit facility ( described in 201cnote 7 2014 long-term debt and lines of credit 201d ) .
### Output:
Logic: the valuation of the common stock would be $ 1 because the total amount of money issued subtracted by the cash consolidation . that remainder equals the same amount of shares which concludes that the share price would be $ 1 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Fair value of Global Payments common stock issued to Active Network stockholders: $599,497
Total purchase consideration: $1,171,576
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 572079 to 599497 which gives add(572079, 599497),
The final logic expression is add(572079, 599497).
### End |