text
stringlengths 601
2.62k
|
|---|
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what will the payment of interest be on the 2021 senior unsecure note?
Context: bank national association , as trustee with respect to $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due 2021 ( incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.1 to norwegian cruise line holdings ltd . 2019s form 8-k filed on december 14 , 2016 ( file no .
### Output:
Logic: to find the payment on interest one would multiple the amount by the interest rate .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Principal amount: $700.0 million
Interest rate: 4.750%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 700.0 by 4.750% which gives multiply(700.0, 4.750%),
The final logic expression is multiply(700.0, 4.750%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage did the balance increase from 2007 to 2010?
Context: balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2008 of $ 9889 is 3861 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance november 1 2008 of $ 9889 is 13750 ; balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2009 of $ 9889 is 4411 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance october 31 2009 of $ 9889 is 18161 ; balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2010 of $ 9889 is 286 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance october 30 2010 of $ 9889 is $ 18447 ; the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2010. .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage increase from 2007 to 2010 one must take the balance for 2010 and subtract that by the balance for 2007 . then take the answer and divide it by the balance for 2007 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance 2007: $9889
Balance 2010: $18447
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 9889 from 18447 which gives subtract(18447, 9889)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 9889 which gives divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent increase was the adjustments to state inventories of the 2016 starting inventories?
Context: the inventories at fifo net of december 312016 is $ 4120030 ; the inventories at fifo net of january 22016 is $ 4009641 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 312016 is 205838 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of january 22016 is 165127 ; inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of 2016 and 2015 were as follows : december 31 , january 2 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the increase in inventories one must divide the amount that is adding to the inventories by total original amount of inventories .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Starting inventories January 2 2016: $4009641
Adjustments to state inventories January 2 2016: 165127
Adjustments to state inventories December 31 2016: 205838
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 205838 by 4120030 which gives divide(205838, 4120030),
The final logic expression is divide(205838, 4120030).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage increase of income for the fiscal years of 2008 to 2010?
Context: the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal years 2010 , 2009 and 2008 include $ 1.8 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage increase of income for the years of 2008 to 2010 one must subtract these two years from each other and then divide the answer by the income for 2008 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Income 2008: $1.3 million
Income 2010: $1.8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1.3 from 1.8 which gives subtract(1.8, 1.3)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1.3 which gives divide(subtract(1.8, 1.3), 1.3)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1.8, 1.3), 1.3), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1.8, 1.3), 1.3), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the asia pacific , what is the percentage of the signal and power solutions segment among all segments?
Context: the signal and power solutions of north america is 45 ; the signal and power solutions of europemiddle east& africa is 33 ; the signal and power solutions of asia pacific is 33 ; the signal and power solutions of south america is 5 ; the signal and power solutions of total is 116 ; the total of north america is 47 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 38 ; the total of asia pacific is 36 ; the total of south america is 5 ; the total of total is 126 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of sites related to signal and power solutions divided by the total number of sites , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Signal and power solutions of Asia Pacific: 33
Total of Asia Pacific: 36
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 33 by 36 which gives divide(33, 36)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(33, 36), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(33, 36), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in december 2016 the nclc issued senior unsecured notes due december 2021 , what is the payment they will receive on december 2021?
Context: in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par .
### Output:
Logic: to find the total amount the company will be paid , one has to multiple the initial loan by the amount of interest and then add the interest to the initial amount .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes: $700.0 million
Interest rate: 4.750%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 700.0 by 4.750% which gives multiply(700.0, 4.750%)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 700.0 which gives add(multiply(700.0, 4.750%), 700.0),
The final logic expression is add(multiply(700.0, 4.750%), 700.0).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage has renting lease expenses increased from 2017 to 2019?
Context: total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer one must look at line 4 where it states the lease expenses for the years of 20172018 , and 2019 . then one must take the 2019 and 2017 lease expenses and subtract them from each other . then divide the answer by the 2017 lease expenses .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Rental expense in fiscal 2019: $92.3 million
Rental expense in fiscal 2017: $58.8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 58.8 from 92.3 which gives subtract(92.3, 58.8)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 58.8 which gives divide(subtract(92.3, 58.8), 58.8)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(92.3, 58.8), 58.8), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(92.3, 58.8), 58.8), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much money can be deducted from income taxes from the 2014 to 2016 , not counting goodwill and intangible assets?
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: depreciation expenses are able to be deducted from future income taxes therefore based on line 2 the total amount of depreciated expenses was $ 378.7 million . this was found by adding up the total depreciation expenses for 20142015 , and 2016
The required values from the context for the question are:
Depreciation expense in fiscal 2016: $134.5 million
Depreciation expense in fiscal 2015: $130.1 million
Depreciation expense in fiscal 2014: $114.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 134.5 to 114.1 which gives add(134.5, 114.1)
step 2: add 130.1 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(130.1, add(134.5, 114.1)),
The final logic expression is add(130.1, add(134.5, 114.1)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total expense related to contribution plans from 2008 to 2010
Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end .
### Output:
Logic: the way to find the answer is to take the total expense related contributions for both the us and non-us and add them together . then take all 3 years totals and add them together .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2010: $20.5 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2009: $21.5 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2008: $22.6 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2010: $11.7 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2009: $10.9 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2008: $13.9 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 21.5 to 10.9 which gives add(21.5, 10.9)
step 2: add 22.6 to 13.9 which gives add(22.6, 13.9)
step 3: add 20.5 to 11.7 which gives add(20.5, 11.7)
step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))
step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(21.5, 10.9), add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))),
The final logic expression is add(add(21.5, 10.9), add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much did the cost of sales change over from 2010 to 2012
Context: the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories .
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer one must added the two years the cost of sales decreased then take the year that the cost of sales increased and subtract that by the previous answer .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Reduction to cost of sales in fiscal 2012: $24087
Reduction to cost of sales in fiscal 2010: $29554
Increase to cost of sales in fiscal 2011: $24708
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 24087 to 29554 which gives add(24087, 29554)
step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from 24708 which gives subtract(24708, add(24087, 29554)),
The final logic expression is subtract(24708, add(24087, 29554)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of customer relationships among the total intangible assets?
Context: the company acquired $ 2.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 1.9 million in existing technology , $ 0.4 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in non-compete agreements to be amortized over five to seven years .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the customer relationships divided by the total value of intangible assets , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Intangible assets value: $2.5 million
Customer relationships value: $0.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 0.4 by 2.5 which gives divide(0.4, 2.5)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(0.4, 2.5), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(0.4, 2.5), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the lowest return for the first year of the investment?
Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.27 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 110.41 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.46 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value , turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Delphi Automotive PLC index on December 31, 2011: $100.98
S&P 500 index on December 31, 2011: $100.80
Automotive Supplier Peer Group index on December 31, 2011: $89.27
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_100 from 110.41 which gives subtract(110.41, const_100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(110.41, const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(110.41, const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of the total purchase price was contingent consideration?
Context: cash the contingent consideration of $ 84751 is 29500 ; cash the total purchase price of $ 84751 is $ 114251 ; the purchase price was as follows: . source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of the total purchase price was contingent consideration , one must divide the contingent consideration by the total purchase price .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Contingent consideration: $84751
Total purchase price: $114251
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 29500 by 114251 which gives divide(29500, 114251)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(29500, 114251), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(29500, 114251), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the balance between 2012 and 2013?\\n
Context: the balance at october 31 2012 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1976987 ; the balance at october 31 2013 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1975971 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation divided by the initial value , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance at October 31, 2012: $1976987 (in thousands)
Balance at October 31, 2013: $1975971 (in thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1976987 from 1975971 which gives subtract(1975971, 1976987)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1976987 which gives divide(subtract(1975971, 1976987), 1976987)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1975971, 1976987), 1976987), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1975971, 1976987), 1976987), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2005-2006 , what is the variation observed in the working capital , in millions?
Context: as of october 31 , 2006 , our working capital was $ 23.4 million , compared to $ 130.6 million as of october 31 , 2005 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Working capital as of October 31, 2006: $23.4 million
Working capital as of October 31, 2005: $130.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 23.4 from 130.6 which gives subtract(130.6, 23.4),
The final logic expression is subtract(130.6, 23.4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage did the allowance for doubtful accounts receivables increase from the beginning of 2015 to the end of 2016?
Context: allowance for doubtful accounts receivable : the january 3 2015 of balance atbeginningof period is $ 13295 ; the january 3 2015 of charges toexpenses is $ 17182 ; the january 3 2015 of deductions is $ -14325 ( 14325 ) ; the january 3 2015 of is -1 ( 1 ) ; the january 3 2015 of balance atend ofperiod is $ 16152 ; allowance for doubtful accounts receivable : the december 31 2016 of balance atbeginningof period is 25758 ; the december 31 2016 of charges toexpenses is 24597 ; the december 31 2016 of deductions is -21191 ( 21191 ) ; the december 31 2016 of is -1 ( 1 ) ; the december 31 2016 of balance atend ofperiod is 29164 ; note : other valuation and qualifying accounts have not been reported in this schedule because they are either not applicable or because the information has been included elsewhere in this report. .
### Output:
Logic: to find the increase in allowance for doubtful accounts receivables one must subtract the begging of the year by the end of the year . then divide the answer by the beginning of the year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance atbeginningof period (January 3, 2015): $13295
balance atend ofperiod (January 3, 2015): $16152
balance atbeginningof period (December 31, 2016): $25758
balance atend ofperiod (December 31, 2016): $29164
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 13295 from 29164 which gives subtract(29164, 13295)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 13295 which gives divide(subtract(29164, 13295), 13295)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(29164, 13295), 13295), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(29164, 13295), 13295), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed in the resulting change in provision for income taxes caused by errors during 2002 and 2001?
Context: 2001 the $ 205 of 2002 is $ 1833 ; the $ 205 of 2003 is $ 5303 ; the $ 205 of 2004 is $ -748 ( 748 ) ; the $ 205 of 2005 is $ 1636 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2002 value: $1833
2001 value: $205
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 205 from 1833 which gives subtract(1833, 205),
The final logic expression is subtract(1833, 205).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total decrease of cost of sales due to the adoption of the lifo method
Context: as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the total decrease of cost of sales one must add the decreases of cost of sales and then subtract the increase in cost of sales to get the total decrease of cost of sales .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Reduction for 2006: $9978
Increase for 2005: $526
Reduction for 2004: $11212
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 9978 to 11212 which gives add(9978, 11212)
step 2: subtract 526 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(add(9978, 11212), 526),
The final logic expression is subtract(add(9978, 11212), 526).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the acquisition-related costs among the total purchase price?
Context: the acquisition-related costs of ( in thousands ) is 2053 ; the total purchase price of ( in thousands ) is $ 22553 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the acquisition-related costs divided by the total purchase price , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
acquisition-related costs: 2053 (in thousands)
total purchase price: $22553 (in thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2053 by 22553 which gives divide(2053, 22553)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2053, 22553), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2053, 22553), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the highest return rate for the first year of the investment?
Context: the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/13 is $ 100.00 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/14 is $ 100.81 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/15 is $ 101.92 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/16 is $ 119.68 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/17 is $ 146.19 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/18 is $ 153.88 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/13 is 100.00 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/14 is 111.39 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/15 is 110.58 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/16 is 121.13 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/17 is 144.65 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/18 is 135.63 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/13 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/14 is 121.41 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/15 is 93.55 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/16 is 120.89 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/17 is 154.19 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/18 is 140.25 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Return rate (12/13): $100.00
Return rate (12/14): $100.81
Return rate (12/15): $101.92
Return rate (12/16): $119.68
Return rate (12/17): $146.19
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_100 from 121.41 which gives subtract(121.41, const_100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(121.41, const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(121.41, const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average value of interest expense net , in millions?
Context: in millions the interest expense net of 2009 is -669 ( 669 ) ; the interest expense net of 2008 is -492 ( 492 ) ; the interest expense net of 2007 is -297 ( 297 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest expense net (2009): -669 (in millions)
Interest expense net (2008): -492 (in millions)
Interest expense net (2007): -297 (in millions)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(interest expense net, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed in the value of operating expenses and other costs concerning the activities during 2008 and 2009?
Context: in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 5680 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 6810 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 6530 ; in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 1091 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 474 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 839 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the values of operating costs expenses of each year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Sales (2009): $5680 (in millions)
Sales (2008): $6810 (in millions)
Operating profit (2009): 1091 (in millions)
Operating profit (2008): 474 (in millions)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1091 from 5680 which gives subtract(5680, 1091)
step 2: subtract 474 from 6810 which gives subtract(6810, 474)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(6810, 474), subtract(5680, 1091)),
The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(6810, 474), subtract(5680, 1091)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs among the total other corporate special items in addition in 2018?
Context: in millions the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs of 2018 is $ 12 ; the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs of 2017 is $ 2014 ; the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs of 2016 is $ 2014 ; in millions the total of 2018 is $ 30 ; the total of 2017 is $ 2014 ; the total of 2016 is $ 8 ; other corporate special items in addition , other pre-tax corporate special items totaling $ 30 million , $ 0 million and $ 8 million were recorded in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs divided by the total then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs (2018): $12 (in millions)
Total of other corporate special items (2018): $30 (in millions)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 12 by 30 which gives divide(12, 30)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 30), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(12, 30), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average operating profit?
Context: in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 1091 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 474 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 839 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of values divided by three to represent the average .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating profit (2009): 1091 (in millions)
Operating profit (2008): 474 (in millions)
Operating profit (2007): 839 (in millions)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(operating profit, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total expense for the company contribution plan from 2013 to 2015?
Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 26.3 million in fiscal 2015 , $ 24.1 million in fiscal 2014 and $ 23.1 million in fiscal 2013 . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees , excluding settlement charges related to the company's irish defined benefit plan , was $ 33.3 million in fiscal 2015 , $ 29.8 million in fiscal 2014 and $ 26.5 million in fiscal 2013 .
### Output:
Logic: in order to find the total expense one must added up all the expenses for the 4 years for both the us and non-us contribution plans .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expense (U.S. employees 2015): $26.3 million
Expense (U.S. employees 2014): $24.1 million
Expense (U.S. employees 2013): $23.1 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 29.8 to 26.5 which gives add(29.8, 26.5)
step 2: add 23.1 to 24.1 which gives add(23.1, 24.1)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(29.8, 26.5), add(23.1, 24.1))
step 4: add 26.3 to 33.3 which gives add(26.3, 33.3)
step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(29.8, 26.5), add(23.1, 24.1)), add(26.3, 33.3)),
The final logic expression is add(add(add(29.8, 26.5), add(23.1, 24.1)), add(26.3, 33.3)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the difference in percentage that total expenses changed between the us and non-us employees from 2009 to 2011?
Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer one must find the percentage increase for each the us and non-us . then compare these two numbers to find the difference in changes for the years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
US 2011: $21.9 million
US 2009: $21.5 million
Non-US 2011: $21.4 million
Non-US 2009: $10.9 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21.5 from 21.9 which gives subtract(21.9, 21.5)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 21.5 which gives divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)
step 3: subtract 10.9 from 21.4 which gives subtract(21.4, 10.9)
step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by 10.9 which gives divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9)
step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9), divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)),
The final logic expression is subtract(divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9), divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the identifiable intangible assets as a percent of total goodwill?
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 107.3 million , resulting in total goodwill of $ 257.6 million .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of intangible assets divided by the total goodwill .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Identifiable Intangible Assets: $107.3 million
Total Goodwill: $257.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 107.3 by 257.6 which gives divide(107.3, 257.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(107.3, 257.6), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(107.3, 257.6), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of electronics and safety sites among all sites?
Context: the electronics and safety of north america is 3 ; the electronics and safety of europemiddle east& africa is 6 ; the electronics and safety of asia pacific is 3 ; the electronics and safety of south america is 2014 ; the electronics and safety of total is 12 ; the total of north america is 39 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 48 ; the total of asia pacific is 33 ; the total of south america is 6 ; the total of total is 126 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of sites related to electronics and safety divided by the total sites .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Electronics and Safety Total: 12 sites
Total Sites: 126 sites
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 12 by 126 which gives divide(12, 126)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 126), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(12, 126), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage increase of inventories at lifo net from the beginning of 2012 to the end of 2013?
Context: the inventories at fifo net of december 282013 is $ 2424795 ; the inventories at fifo net of december 292012 is $ 2182419 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 282013 is 131762 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 292012 is 126190 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 282013 is $ 2556557 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 292012 is $ 2308609 ; inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were as follows : december 28 , december 29 .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage increase of inventories at lifo net , one must take the inventories for 2013 and subtract it from the inventories from 2012 . then take the answer and divide it by the inventories for 2012
The required values from the context for the question are:
Inventories at LIFO 2013: $2556557
Inventories at LIFO 2012: $2308609
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 2556557 by 2182419 which gives multiply(2556557, 2182419)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2182419 which gives divide(multiply(2556557, 2182419), 2182419),
The final logic expression is divide(multiply(2556557, 2182419), 2182419).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in reserves against inventory from 2005 to 2006?
Context: the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage change in reserves against inventory from 2005 to 2006 one must subtract the 2006 number from the 2005 and then take the answer and divide it by the reserves against inventory for 2005 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Reserves 2006: $31376
Reserves 2005: $22825
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 22825 from 31376 which gives subtract(31376, 22825)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 22825 which gives divide(subtract(31376, 22825), 22825)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(31376, 22825), 22825), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(31376, 22825), 22825), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of powertrain systems sites among all sites?
Context: the powertrain systems of north america is 4 ; the powertrain systems of europemiddle east& africa is 8 ; the powertrain systems of asia pacific is 5 ; the powertrain systems of south america is 1 ; the powertrain systems of total is 18 ; the total of north america is 39 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 48 ; the total of asia pacific is 33 ; the total of south america is 6 ; the total of total is 126 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of sites related to powertrain systems divided by the total sites .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Powertrain Systems Sites: 18 sites
Total Sites: 126 sites
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 18 by 126 which gives divide(18, 126)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(18, 126), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(18, 126), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in deferred tax assets and regulatory assets from 2013 to 2014
Context: the acts effectively make the subsidy payments taxable in tax years beginning after december 31 , 2012 and as a result , the company followed its original accounting for the underfunded status of the other postretirement benefits for the medicare part d adjustment and recorded a reduction in deferred tax assets and an increase in its regulatory assets amounting to $ 6348 and $ 6241 at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the change in the deferred tax assets and an increase in its regulatory assets from 2013 to 2013 as a percent ( 2014 amt-2013amt ) /2013amt
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deferred Tax & Regulatory Assets 2014: $6348
Deferred Tax & Regulatory Assets 2013: $6241
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 6241 from 6348 which gives subtract(6348, 6241)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 6241 which gives divide(subtract(6348, 6241), 6241)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(6348, 6241), 6241), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(6348, 6241), 6241), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the ratio of the total flight attendants to total maintenance personnel
Context: the flight attendants of mainline operations is 24700 ; the flight attendants of wholly-owned regional carriers is 2200 ; the flight attendants of total is 26900 ; the maintenance personnel of mainline operations is 14900 ; the maintenance personnel of wholly-owned regional carriers is 2000 ; the maintenance personnel of total is 16900 ;
### Output:
Logic: for every maintenance personnel there is 1.6 flight attendants
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total Flight Attendants: 26900
Total Maintenance Personnel: 16900
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 26900 by 16900 which gives divide(26900, 16900),
The final logic expression is divide(26900, 16900).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total impairment costs recorded from 2003 to 2005 in millions
Context: the company also recorded impair- ment charges of approximately $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in each of 2004 and 2003 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the company recorded impairment charges of approximately $ 0.5 million and $ 0.6 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively , and $ 4.7 million prior to 2003 to reduce the carrying value of its homerville , georgia dc ( which was sold in 2004 ) .
### Output:
Logic: the total is the sum of all applicable amounts
The required values from the context for the question are:
Impairment 2005: $0.6 million
Impairment 2004: $0.7 million (0.2 + 0.5)
Impairment 2003: $0.8 million (0.2 + 0.6)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 0.6 to 0.5 which gives add(0.6, 0.5)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 4.7 which gives add(add(0.6, 0.5), 4.7),
The final logic expression is add(add(0.6, 0.5), 4.7).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average operating income?
Context: the operating income of 2016 is 895.2 ; the operating income of 2015 is 808.4 ; the operating income of 2014 is 762.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all operating margins divided by three ( number of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating Income 2016: 895.2
Operating Income 2015: 808.4
Operating Income 2014: 762.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(operating income, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of lease payments will be paid out in the first year?
Context: 2014 the total future minimum lease payments of $ 11057 is $ 57096 ; future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases at may 31 , 2013 were as follows : fiscal years ending may 31: .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of lease payments for the first year , one must divide the payment for the first year by the total amount of lease payments .
The required values from the context for the question are:
First Year Lease Payments: $11057
Total Lease Payments: $57096
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 11057 by 57096 which gives divide(11057, 57096)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(11057, 57096), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(11057, 57096), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average ending balance for valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets?
Context: the ending balance of 2018 is $ 167142 ; the ending balance of 2017 is $ 466421 ; the ending balance of 2016 is $ 383221 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all ending balance values divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Ending Balance 2018: $167142
Ending Balance 2017: $466421
Ending Balance 2016: $383221
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(ending balance, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the estimated percentage of revolving credit facility in relation with the total senior credit facility in millions?
Context: we maintained a $ 1.4 billion senior credit facility with various financial institutions , including the $ 420.5 million term loan and a $ 945.5 million revolving credit facility .
### Output:
Logic: its the ratio between the revolving credit facility ( $ 945.5 millions ) and the total senior credit facility ( $ 1.4 billions , which has to be converted to $ 1400 millions ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
$1.4 billion senior credit facility
$420.5 million term loan
$945.5 million revolving credit facility
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1.4 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.4, const_1000)
step 2: divide 945.5 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(945.5, multiply(1.4, const_1000))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(945.5, multiply(1.4, const_1000)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(945.5, multiply(1.4, const_1000)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of net assets acquired was considered goodwill?
Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the net assets acquired of total is $ 16594 ; the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of net assets compared to goodwill , one must divide the goodwill by the total net assets . that gives you the percentage of goodwill to net assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill: $13536
Net assets acquired: $16594
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 13536 by 16594 which gives divide(13536, 16594)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the net change in tax positions in 2014
Context: balance at january 1 2013 the increases in current period tax positions of $ 180993 is 53818 ; balance at january 1 2013 the decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions of $ 180993 is -36528 ( 36528 ) ; the total balance in the table above does not include interest and penalties of $ 157 and $ 242 as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , which is recorded as a component of income tax expense .
### Output:
Logic: the net change in the tax position is the sum of the increase and the decrease plus the penalties and interest
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increases in current period tax positions: $53818
Decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions: -$36528
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 53818 to -36528 which gives add(53818, -36528)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 157 which gives add(add(53818, -36528), 157),
The final logic expression is add(add(53818, -36528), 157).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the anualized return for s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017?
Context: the cme group inc . of 2013 is $ 164.01 ; the cme group inc . of 2014 is $ 194.06 ; the cme group inc . of 2015 is $ 208.95 ; the cme group inc . of 2016 is $ 279.85 ; the cme group inc . of 2017 is $ 370.32 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 . the s&p 500 of 2013 is 132.39 ; the s&p 500 of 2014 is 150.51 ; the s&p 500 of 2015 is 152.59 ; the s&p 500 of 2016 is 170.84 ; the s&p 500 of 2017 is 208.14 ;
### Output:
Logic: considering the years 2012-2017 , the anualized return is going to be the difference between the initial $ 100 and the final value of $ 108.14 took as a percentage and then calculated as in the compund interest's formula .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Initial investment: $100
S&P 500 in 2012 (start): Not provided
S&P 500 in 2013: 132.39
S&P 500 in 2014: 150.51
S&P 500 in 2015: 152.59
S&P 500 in 2016: 170.84
S&P 500 in 2017: 208.14
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_1 from exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)) which gives subtract(exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the percentage of unrecognized tax benefits that may have an earnings impact?
Context: the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2018 , was $ 29 million , resulting from the tax treatment of its research and experimental expenditures related to certain innovations in its horizontal drilling and completion projects , of which $ 12 million may potentially have an earnings impact .
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of dollars related to unrecognized tax benefits that may have an earnings impact divided by the total value of unrecognized tax benefits .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018: $29 million
Portion of unrecognized tax benefits that may have an earnings impact: $12 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 12 by 29 which gives divide(12, 29)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 29), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(12, 29), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between the additions for tax positions of prior years and the current year , in millions?
Context: balance at january 1 2007 the additions based on tax positions related to the current year of $ 53 is 4 ; balance at january 1 2007 the additions for tax positions of prior years of $ 53 is 24 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year: 4
Additions for tax positions of prior years: 24
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 4 from 24 which gives subtract(24, 4),
The final logic expression is subtract(24, 4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate of the s&p 500 index from december 31 , 2004 to 2007
Context: the s&p 500 index of 2004 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 index of 2005 is 104.91 ; the s&p 500 index of 2006 is 121.48 ; the s&p 500 index of 2007 is 128.16 ; the s&p 500 index of 2008 is 80.74 ; the s&p 500 index of 2009 is 102.11 ;
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divide by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
S&P 500 index in 2004: 100.00
S&P 500 index in 2005: 104.91
S&P 500 index in 2006: 121.48
S&P 500 index in 2007: 128.16
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 128.16 by const_100 which gives divide(128.16, const_100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(128.16, const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(128.16, const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the average exercise price of options , what is the increase in the total value of stock options observed during 2016 and 2017 , in millions of dollars?
Context: the stock options ( 1 ) of 2018 is 9 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2017 is 11 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2016 is 13 ; ( 1 ) the average exercise price of options per share was $ 26.79 , $ 33.32 , and $ 26.93 for 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the average exercise price of options per share multiplied by the number of shares in 2016 and 2017 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Stock options in 2016: 13
Stock options in 2017: 11
Average exercise price of options in 2016: $26.93
Average exercise price of options in 2017: $33.32
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 13 by 26.93 which gives multiply(13, 26.93)
step 2: multiply 11 by 33.32 which gives multiply(11, 33.32)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(11, 33.32), multiply(13, 26.93)),
The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(11, 33.32), multiply(13, 26.93)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 312018 what was the percent of restricted cash and marketable securities dedicated to the support our insurance programs
Context: accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2018 , we had $ 108.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 78.6 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability .
### Output:
Logic: to obtain the percent of restricted cash and marketable securities dedicated to the support our insurance programs to the total the percent of restricted cash and marketable securities divide the restricted dedicated amount by the total amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Restricted cash and marketable securities as of December 31, 2018: $108.1 million
Restricted cash and marketable securities supporting insurance programs: $78.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 78.6 by 108.1 which gives divide(78.6, 108.1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(78.6, 108.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(78.6, 108.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent increase in long-term debt did the floating rate notes maturing in 2010?
Context: 2007 the 2010 of $ 2.6 is 240.9 ; 2007 the 2011 of $ 2.6 is 500.0 ; the new floating rate notes mature on november 15 , 2010 and bear interest at a per annum rate equal to three-month libor plus 200 basis points , 125 basis points less than the interest rate on the old floating rate notes . in connection with the exchange , we made an early participation payment of $ 41.25 ( actual amount ) in cash per $ 1000 ( actual amount ) principal amount of old floating rate notes for a total payment of $ 10.3 .
### Output:
Logic: the company's floating rate notes matured in 2010 which likely is the cause of the significant increase in long-term debt . to find the percentage we take the 2011 and subtract that number from the 2010 . we take this solution and divide it by 2010?
The required values from the context for the question are:
2010 long-term debt value: 240.9
2011 long-term debt value: 500.0
Early participation payment: $41.25 per $1000
Total payment: $10.3
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 240.9 from 500.0 which gives subtract(500.0, 240.9)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 240.9 which gives divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of net assets acquired was considered goodwill?
Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the net assets acquired of total is $ 16594 ; the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of net assets compared to goodwill , one must divide the goodwill by the total net assets . that gives you the percentage of goodwill to net assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill: $13536
Net assets acquired: $16594
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 13536 by 16594 which gives divide(13536, 16594)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase of the total trading assets between the years 2007 and 2008 , in millions of dollars?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between the sum of the trading assets during 2007 and 2008 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments in 2007: $381415
Trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments in 2008: $384102
Trading assets 2013 derivative receivables in 2007: 65439
Trading assets 2013 derivative receivables in 2008: 121417
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 381415 to 65439 which gives add(381415, 65439)
step 2: add 384102 to 121417 which gives add(384102, 121417)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(add(384102, 121417), add(381415, 65439)),
The final logic expression is subtract(add(384102, 121417), add(381415, 65439)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the contractual obligations in which payments due by 1-3 years , what is the percentage of the operating leases in relation to the total obligations?
Context: contractual obligations the operating leases of payments due by period total is $ 44048 ; the operating leases of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 7957 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 13789 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 11061 ; the operating leases of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 11241 ; contractual obligations the total of payments due by period total is $ 95519 ; the total of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 55923 ; the total of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 16054 ; the total of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 12301 ; the total of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 11241 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the operating leases ( $ 13789 ) divided by the total obligations ( $ 16054 ) in this period .
The required values from the context for the question are:
operating leases 1-3 years: $13789
total obligations 1-3 years: $16054
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 13789 by 16054 which gives divide(13789, 16054)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(13789, 16054), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(13789, 16054), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how bigger were the interest and penalties concerning the interest income in the year 2015?
Context: in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , alcoa recognized $ 8 , $ 1 , and $ 2 , respectively , in interest and penalties . due to the expiration of the statute of limitations , settlements with tax authorities , and refunded overpayments , alcoa also recognized interest income of $ 2 , $ 5 , and $ 12 in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the interest and penalties divided by the interest income then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
interest and penalties 2015: $8
interest income 2015: $2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 8 by 2 which gives divide(8, 2)
step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(8, 2), 1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(8, 2), 1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(8, 2), 1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the anualized return for cme group from 2012 to 2017?
Context: the cme group inc . of 2013 is $ 164.01 ; the cme group inc . of 2014 is $ 194.06 ; the cme group inc . of 2015 is $ 208.95 ; the cme group inc . of 2016 is $ 279.85 ; the cme group inc . of 2017 is $ 370.32 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 .
### Output:
Logic: considering the years 2012-2017 , the anualized return is going to be the difference between the initial $ 100 and the final value of $ 370.32 took as a percentage and then calculated as in the compund interest's formula .
The required values from the context for the question are:
initial investment: $100
final value 2017: $370.32
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_1 from exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)) which gives subtract(exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentual decrease observed in the liabilities for accrued interest and penalties during 2012 and 2013?
Context: liabilities for accrued interest and penalties were $ 665 million and $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the final value of liabilities for accrued interest and penalties minus the initial one , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
liabilities for accrued interest and penalties 2013: $665 million
liabilities for accrued interest and penalties 2012: $1.2 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1.2 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.2, const_1000)
step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from 665 which gives subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000))
step 3: multiply 1.2 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.2, const_1000)
step 4: divide the expression of step 2 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000)), multiply(1.2, const_1000))
step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000)), multiply(1.2, const_1000)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000)), multiply(1.2, const_1000)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the payments due to less than a year , what is the percentage of purchase obligations concerning the total expenses?
Context: contractual obligations the purchase obligations of payments due by period total is $ 265409 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 265409 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 0 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 0 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 0 ; contractual obligations the total of payments due by period total is $ 296554 ; the total of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 268766 ; the total of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 6271 ; the total of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 6040 ; the total of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 15477 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of purchase obligations divided by the value of the total expenses .
The required values from the context for the question are:
purchase obligations less than 1 year: $265409
total expenses less than 1 year: $268766
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 265409 by 268766 which gives divide(265409, 268766)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(265409, 268766), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(265409, 268766), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 31.2013 what was the ratio of the interest and penalty as a percent of the total unrecognized tax benefits
Context: the total balance in the table above does not include interest and penalties of $ 242 and $ 260 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively , which is recorded as a component of income tax expense . balance at january 1 2012 the balance at december 31 2013 of $ 158578 is $ 177947 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent of the total balance representing interest and penalty add the interest and penalty to the end balance then divide the intrest by the end balance
The required values from the context for the question are:
interest and penalties 2013: $242
total unrecognized tax benefits 2013: $158578
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 242 to 177947 which gives add(242, 177947)
step 2: divide 242 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(242, add(242, 177947))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(242, add(242, 177947)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(242, add(242, 177947)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the average exercise price of options , what is the estimated total value of stock options in 2018 , in millions of dollars?
Context: the stock options ( 1 ) of 2018 is 9 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2017 is 11 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2016 is 13 ; ( 1 ) the average exercise price of options per share was $ 26.79 , $ 33.32 , and $ 26.93 for 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the average exercise price of options per share multiplied by the number of shares .
The required values from the context for the question are:
stock options 2018: 9
average exercise price 2018: $26.79
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 9 by 26.79 which gives multiply(9, 26.79),
The final logic expression is multiply(9, 26.79).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual increase in the balance during the year 2007?
Context: balance at january 1 2007 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 53 is $ 70 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the balance at the end of the year divided by the initial one , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance January 1 2007: $53
balance December 31 2007: $70
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 70 by 53 which gives divide(70, 53)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(70, 53), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(70, 53), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(70, 53), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage increase in total expense from 2017 to 2018?
Context: the total expense of 2018 is $ 156 ; the total expense of 2017 is $ 15 ; income taxes .
### Output:
Logic: get difference , then divide by starting value , then multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
total expense 2018: $156
total expense 2017: $15
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 15 from 156 which gives subtract(156, 15)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 15 which gives divide(subtract(156, 15), 15)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2015 what was the the percentage change in the account balance
Context: the balance at beginning of year of 2015 is $ 38.9 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2014 is $ 38.3 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2013 is $ 45.3 ; the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 46.7 ; the balance at end of year of 2014 is $ 38.9 ; the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 38.3 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from the begin to the end divide by the begin
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance beginning of year 2015: $38.9
balance end of year 2015: $46.7
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 38.9 from 46.7 which gives subtract(46.7, 38.9)
step 2: subtract 38.9 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(46.7, 38.9), 38.9)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(46.7, 38.9), 38.9), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(46.7, 38.9), 38.9), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the expected return rate on assets , what is the total value of plan assets in 2008 , in millions?
Context: ( in millions ) the expected return on assets of 25 basis-point increase is $ -1.7 ( 1.7 ) ; the expected return on assets of 25 basis-point decrease is $ 1.7 ; for fi scal 2008 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) for our u.s .
### Output:
Logic: the total value is calculated using 7.75% as the expected return rate , which value is 1.7 , then multiplying by 100 and dividing by 7.75 to approach the 100% value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
expected return on assets: 7.75%
expected return value: $1.7
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1.7 by const_100 which gives multiply(1.7, const_100)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7.75 which gives divide(multiply(1.7, const_100), 7.75),
The final logic expression is divide(multiply(1.7, const_100), 7.75).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the decrease observed in the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2017 and 2018?
Context: the total fair value of restricted stock vested during fiscal years 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 was $ 2.2 , $ 4.1 , and $ 4.3 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual decrease of the total fair value of restricted stock that vested , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value of the final value , then dividing by the initial value and turning it into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
total fair value of restricted stock 2018: $2.2
total fair value of restricted stock 2017: $4.1
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 4.1 from 2.2 which gives subtract(2.2, 4.1)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 4.1 which gives divide(subtract(2.2, 4.1), 4.1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2.2, 4.1), 4.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2.2, 4.1), 4.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase in the operating margin observed in 2015 and 2016?
Context: the operating margin of 2016 is 26.8% ( 26.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2015 is 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) ; the operating margin of 2014 is 18.7% ( 18.7 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between these operating margins .
The required values from the context for the question are:
operating margin 2016: 26.8%
operating margin 2015: 21.9%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21.9% from 26.8% which gives subtract(26.8%, 21.9%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(26.8%, 21.9%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(26.8%, 21.9%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2008 what was the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts
Context: the balance at beginning of year of 2010 is $ 55.2 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2009 is $ 65.7 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2008 is $ 14.7 ; the balance at end of year of 2010 is $ 50.9 ; the balance at end of year of 2009 is $ 55.2 ; the balance at end of year of 2008 is $ 65.7 ;
### Output:
Logic: the change is the difference from the begin to the end
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance at beginning of year of 2008: $14.7
balance at end of year of 2008: $65.7
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 14.7 from 65.7 which gives subtract(65.7, 14.7),
The final logic expression is subtract(65.7, 14.7).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage increase in total expense from 2017 to 2018?
Context: the total expense of 2018 is $ 156 ; the total expense of 2017 is $ 15 ; income taxes .
### Output:
Logic: get difference , then divide by starting value , then multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
total expense of 2018: $156
total expense of 2017: $15
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 15 from 156 which gives subtract(156, 15)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 15 which gives divide(subtract(156, 15), 15)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage effect of the hedges on the anticipated increase in the 2014 increase in fuel expenses
Context: based on our 2014 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that as of december 31 , 2013 , a $ 1 per barrel increase in the price of crude oil would increase our 2014 annual fuel expense by $ 104 million ( excluding the effect of our hedges ) , and by $ 87 million ( taking into account such hedges ) .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percent you get the change in the amounts and divide it by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
increase in fuel expense per $1 per barrel increase without hedges: $104 million
increase in fuel expense per $1 per barrel increase with hedges: $87 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 87 from 104 which gives subtract(104, 87)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 87 which gives divide(subtract(104, 87), 87)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(104, 87), 87), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(104, 87), 87), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the decrease observed in the operating leases with payments due to 3-5 years and payments due to more than 5 years?
Context: contractual obligations the operating leases of payments due by period total is $ 31145 ; the operating leases of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 3357 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 6271 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 6040 ; the operating leases of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 15477 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those two payments of operating leases .
The required values from the context for the question are:
operating leases of payments due by period 3-5 years: $6040
operating leases of payments due by period more than 5 years: $15477
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 6040 from 15477 which gives subtract(15477, 6040),
The final logic expression is subtract(15477, 6040).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between the growth of the balance throughout the fiscal year , during 2007 and 2008?
Context: the balance at beginning of year of december 27 2008 is $ 126.6 ; the balance at beginning of year of december 29 2007 is $ 70.5 ; the balance at december 27 2008 of december 27 2008 is $ 214.4 ; the balance at december 27 2008 of december 29 2007 is $ 126.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the percentual growth ( final balance as a percent of initial balance ) of each year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance at beginning of year of december 27 2008: $126.6
balance at beginning of year of december 29 2007: $70.5
balance at december 27 2008 of december 27 2008: $214.4
balance at december 27 2008 of december 29 2007: $126.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 214.4 by 126.6 which gives divide(214.4, 126.6)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1)
step 3: divide 126.6 by 70.5 which gives divide(126.6, 70.5)
step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1)
step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1), subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1), subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1), subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the payment of dividends during 2017 and 2018?
Context: the total of 2018 is $ 4.25 ; the total of 2017 is $ 3.71 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
total of 2018: $4.25
total of 2017: $3.71
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 4.25 by 3.71 which gives divide(4.25, 3.71)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(4.25, 3.71), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(4.25, 3.71), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(4.25, 3.71), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth of consolidated net sales , in percentage , from 2005 to 2007
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 5400 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005 is $ 5038 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 20142006 is 43% ( 43 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2006 20142005 is 7% ( 7 % ) ; in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 21% ( 21 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 13% ( 13 % ) in 2006 and 14% ( 14 % ) in 2005 .
### Output:
Logic: to find out the consolidated net sales , you must take the percentage of segmented net sales given in line 17 . once found out the consolidated net sales you figure out the percentage of change over that time period . which was 130%
The required values from the context for the question are:
segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007: $7729
segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006: $5400
segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005: $5038
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 5038 by 14% which gives multiply(5038, 14%)
step 2: multiply 7729 by 21% which gives multiply(7729, 21%)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%))
step 4: multiply 5038 by 14% which gives multiply(5038, 14%)
step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%)), multiply(5038, 14%))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%)), multiply(5038, 14%)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%)), multiply(5038, 14%)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the fluctuation between the effective tax expense rate and the statutory u.s . federal tax rate in 2016?
Context: the statutory u.s . federal tax rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . federal tax rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . federal tax rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2017 is ( 60.8 ) % ( % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2016 is 32.9% ( 32.9 % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2015 is 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) ; in 2016 , the effective rate was lower than the statutory tax rate largely due to the release of the valuation allowances related to the sale of bm&fbovespa shares . federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) .
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between those tax rates
The required values from the context for the question are:
statutory u.s. federal tax rate of 2016: 35.0%
effective tax expense rate of 2016: 32.9%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 32.9% from 35% which gives subtract(35%, 32.9%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(35%, 32.9%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(35%, 32.9%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the decrease of the effective tax expense rate between 2015 and 2016?
Context: the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2017 is ( 60.8 ) % ( % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2016 is 32.9% ( 32.9 % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2015 is 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between the tax rate from 2015 to 2016
The required values from the context for the question are:
effective tax expense rate of 2016: 32.9%
effective tax expense rate of 2015: 36.3%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 32.9% from 36.3% which gives subtract(36.3%, 32.9%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(36.3%, 32.9%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(36.3%, 32.9%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the net derivative gains during 2006 and 2007?
Context: ( millions ) as of december 31 the net derivative gains ( losses ) of 2007 is $ 24 ; the net derivative gains ( losses ) of 2006 is $ 15 ; the net derivative gains ( losses ) of 2005 is $ -11 ( 11 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the net derivative value of 2007 divided by the 2006's , then transformed into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
net derivative gains of 2007: $24
net derivative gains of 2006: $15
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 24 by 15 which gives divide(24, 15)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(24, 15), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(24, 15), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(24, 15), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the 2008 net deferred loss , what is the percentage of amortization expenses?
Context: for fi scal 2008 , our pension plans had actual negative return on assets of $ 19.3 million as compared with expected return on assets of $ 47.0 million , which resulted in a net deferred loss of $ 66.3 million , of which approximately $ 34 million is subject to amortiza- tion over periods ranging from approximately 8 to 16 years .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the amortizations divided by the total net deferred loss , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
net deferred loss of 2008: $66.3 million
amortizations subject to net deferred loss: $34 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 34 by 66.3 which gives divide(34, 66.3)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(34, 66.3), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(34, 66.3), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in the the research and development costs from 2014 to 2015
Context: research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the current amount less the most recent amount divide by the most recent amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
research and development expense for 2015: $119 million
research and development expense for 2014: $86 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 86 from 119 which gives subtract(119, 86)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 86 which gives add(subtract(119, 86), 86)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_2 which gives divide(add(subtract(119, 86), 86), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(subtract(119, 86), 86), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 312013 what was the percent of labor-related deemed claim as part of the total reorganization items net
Context: the labor-related deemed claim ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 1733 ; the total reorganization items net of december 31 2013 is $ 2655 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent is the amount divided by the total multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
labor-related deemed claim (December 31, 2013): $1733
total reorganization items net (December 31, 2013): $2655
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1733 by 2655 which gives divide(1733, 2655)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1733, 2655), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1733, 2655), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage decline in recorded international slot and route authorities to $ 708 million from $ 736 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
Context: intangible assets the company has recorded international slot and route authorities of $ 708 million and $ 736 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: to get the percentage change we subtract the recent amount from the most recent and divide by the recent amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
international slot and route authorities (December 31, 2010): $708 million
international slot and route authorities (December 31, 2009): $736 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 736 from 708 which gives subtract(708, 736)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 736 which gives divide(subtract(708, 736), 736)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(708, 736), 736), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(708, 736), 736), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent increase in long-term debt did the floating rate notes maturing in 2010?
Context: 2007 the 2010 of $ 2.6 is 240.9 ; 2007 the 2011 of $ 2.6 is 500.0 ; the new floating rate notes mature on november 15 , 2010 and bear interest at a per annum rate equal to three-month libor plus 200 basis points , 125 basis points less than the interest rate on the old floating rate notes . in connection with the exchange , we made an early participation payment of $ 41.25 ( actual amount ) in cash per $ 1000 ( actual amount ) principal amount of old floating rate notes for a total payment of $ 10.3 .
### Output:
Logic: the company's floating rate notes matured in 2010 which likely is the cause of the significant increase in long-term debt . to find the percentage we take the 2011 and subtract that number from the 2010 . we take this solution and divide it by 2010?
The required values from the context for the question are:
2010 value: $240.9
2011 value: $500.0
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 240.9 from 500.0 which gives subtract(500.0, 240.9)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 240.9 which gives divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in light of the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets ( managed basis ) , what is the total value of the average assets in 2018 , in millions of dollars?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the average interest-earning assets of 2018 is $ 2229188 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2017 is $ 2180592 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2016 is $ 2101604 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis of 2018 is 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ; the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis of 2017 is 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) ; the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis of 2016 is 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: considering the average interest-earning assets as 2.5% of the average assets earning , the total value is calculated multiplying it for 100 and then dividing by the interest's percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
average interest-earning assets (2018): $2229188 million
net interest yield on average interest-earning assets (2018): 2.50%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 2229188 by const_100 which gives multiply(2229188, const_100)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2.50 which gives divide(multiply(2229188, const_100), 2.50),
The final logic expression is divide(multiply(2229188, const_100), 2.50).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percent of americans labor-related deemed claim as a part of the total claims and other bankruptcy settlement obligations as of december2013
Context: aag series a preferred stock the labor-related deemed claim of $ 3329 is 849 ; aag series a preferred stock the total of $ 3329 is $ 5424 ;
### Output:
Logic: to get the percent you divide the amount in question by the total and multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
labor-related deemed claim: $849
total: $5424
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 849 by 5424 which gives divide(849, 5424)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(849, 5424), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(849, 5424), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what are the average net unrealized investment gains for the period?
Context: ( millions ) as of december 31 the net unrealized investment gains of 2007 is 76 ; the net unrealized investment gains of 2006 is 73 ; the net unrealized investment gains of 2005 is 52 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all net unrealized investment gains divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
net unrealized investment gains (2007): 76
net unrealized investment gains (2006): 73
net unrealized investment gains (2005): 52
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(net unrealized investment gains, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 312011 what was the ratio of the loans with a maturity in 2037 to the loans with a maturity in 2033
Context: trusts the etbh capital trust xxv 2014xxx of face value is 110000 ; the etbh capital trust xxv 2014xxx of maturity date is 2037 ; the etbh capital trust xxv 2014xxx of annual interest rate is 1.90%-2.00% ( 1.90%-2.00 % ) above 3-month libor ; trusts the etbh capital trust vii ix 2014xii of face value is 65000 ; the etbh capital trust vii ix 2014xii of maturity date is 2033 ; the etbh capital trust vii ix 2014xii of annual interest rate is 3.00%-3.30% ( 3.00%-3.30 % ) above 3-month libor ;
### Output:
Logic: the ratio of the loans with a maturity in 2037 to the loans with a maturity in 2033 was 1.69 to 1
The required values from the context for the question are:
loans with a maturity in 2037: 110000
loans with a maturity in 2033: 65000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 110000 by 65000 which gives divide(110000, 65000),
The final logic expression is divide(110000, 65000).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total cost in millions of capital lease obligation , principal only?
Context: contractual obligations millions of dollars the capital lease obligations [b] of total is 2975 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2010 is 290 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2011 is 292 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2012 is 247 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2013 is 256 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2014 is 267 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 after 2014 is 1623 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 other is - ; [b] represents total obligations , including interest component of $ 914 million .
### Output:
Logic: subtract interest component
The required values from the context for the question are:
capital lease obligations total: 2975 million
interest component: $914 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 914 from 2975 which gives subtract(2975, 914),
The final logic expression is subtract(2975, 914).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average liability for uncertain tax positions , in millions?
Context: the company 2019s liability for uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , includes $ 228 million , $ 219 million , and $ 240 million , respectively , related to amounts that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all liability for uncertain tax positions divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
liability for uncertain tax positions (2018): $228 million
liability for uncertain tax positions (2017): $219 million
liability for uncertain tax positions (2016): $240 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 228 to 219 which gives add(228, 219)
step 2: add 240 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(240, add(228, 219))
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(240, add(228, 219)), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(240, add(228, 219)), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total value of the approved equity compensation plans in 2005 , in millions of dollars?
Context: plan category the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) is 1211143 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) is $ 308.10 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 5156223 ; the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders .
### Output:
Logic: its the number of the approved equity compensation plans multiplied by it's exercise price .
The required values from the context for the question are:
number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options: 1211143
weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options: $308.10
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1211143 by 308.10 which gives multiply(1211143, 308.10)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_1000000 which gives divide(multiply(1211143, 308.10), const_1000000),
The final logic expression is divide(multiply(1211143, 308.10), const_1000000).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the net interest income managed basis in 2017 , what is the amount of expenses associated with liabilities , in millions of dollars?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the average interest-earning assets of 2018 is $ 2229188 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2017 is $ 2180592 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2016 is $ 2101604 ;
### Output:
Logic: the expenses associated with liabilities is the difference between the revenue generated from the average interest-earning assets and the net interest income .
The required values from the context for the question are:
net interest income managed basis (2017): $51410 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 51410 from 2180592 which gives subtract(2180592, 51410),
The final logic expression is subtract(2180592, 51410).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2011-2013 , what is the average value of settlements?
Context: the settlements of 2013 is -603 ( 603 ) ; the settlements of 2012 is -67 ( 67 ) ; the settlements of 2011 is -259 ( 259 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all settlements divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
settlements (2013): -603
settlements (2012): -67
settlements (2011): -259
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(settlements, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: whats is the percentage of equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders?
Context: plan category the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) is 5978 ; the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) is 22.00 ; the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 2014 ; plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) is 1217121 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) is ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 5156223 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the division between the equity compensation plans that were not approved and the total equity compensation plans .
The required values from the context for the question are:
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a): 5978
total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a): 1217121
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 5978 by 1217121 which gives divide(5978, 1217121)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(5978, 1217121), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(5978, 1217121), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2011 what was the total operating costs in millions
Context: year the 2011 of gallons consumed ( in millions ) is 2756 ; the 2011 of average costper gallon is $ 3.01 ; the 2011 of total cost ( in millions ) is $ 8304 ; the 2011 of percent of total operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: to obtain the total costs you divide the expenses provide by their given percent of the total operating expenses
The required values from the context for the question are:
2011 of total cost (in millions): $8304
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 8304 by 33.2% which gives divide(8304, 33.2%),
The final logic expression is divide(8304, 33.2%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the amount of the total impairment charges included in sg&a expense from 2005 to 2007 in millions
Context: the company recorded impairment charges included in sg&a expense of approximately $ 0.2 million in the 2007 predecessor period , $ 9.4 million in 2006 and $ 0.6 million in 2005 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations .
### Output:
Logic: the total amount in question is the sum of all amounts
The required values from the context for the question are:
impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2007: $0.2 million
impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2006: $9.4 million
impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2005: $0.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 0.2 to 9.4 which gives add(0.2, 9.4)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 0.6 which gives add(add(0.2, 9.4), 0.6),
The final logic expression is add(add(0.2, 9.4), 0.6).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the increase in the settlements with tax authorities as a percent of the tax liabilities observed during 2013 and 2014?
Context: december 31 , the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -2 ( 2 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -4 ( 4 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -2 ( 2 ) ; december 31 , the settlements with tax authorities of 2015 is -2 ( 2 ) ; the settlements with tax authorities of 2014 is -29 ( 29 ) ; the settlements with tax authorities of 2013 is -8 ( 8 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the settlements with tax authorities' percentage in tax liabilities.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
settlements with tax authorities of 2014: -29 (29)
settlements with tax authorities of 2013: -8 (8)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 8 to 2 which gives add(8, 2)
step 2: divide 8 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(8, add(8, 2))
step 3: add 29 to 4 which gives add(29, 4)
step 4: divide 29 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(29, add(29, 4))
step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(divide(29, add(29, 4)), divide(8, add(8, 2)))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(29, add(29, 4)), divide(8, add(8, 2))), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(29, add(29, 4)), divide(8, add(8, 2))), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2014 , what are the variation between the expenses for environmental remediation at sites and the reserves environmental matters , in millions?
Context: we incurred $ 4.4 million , $ 2.9 million , and $ 2.1 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 15.2 million and $ 8.8 million .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the expenses' value and the value of the reserve in that year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
expenses for environmental remediation at sites 2014: $2.9 million
reserves for environmental matters 2014: $8.8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 2.9 from 8.8 which gives subtract(8.8, 2.9),
The final logic expression is subtract(8.8, 2.9).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2007 what was the ratio of the interest expense to the interest income
Context: ( millions ) the interest expense of 2007 is $ 210 ; the interest expense of 2006 is $ 122 ; the interest expense of 2005 is $ 82 ; ( millions ) the interest income of 2007 is -132 ( 132 ) ; the interest income of 2006 is -51 ( 51 ) ; the interest income of 2005 is -56 ( 56 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the ratio of the interest expense to the interest income was 1.59 to 1
The required values from the context for the question are:
interest expense 2007: $210
interest income 2007: -132 (132)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 210 by 132 which gives divide(210, 132),
The final logic expression is divide(210, 132).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the decrease observed in the additions for tax positions of prior years , in millions?
Context: the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2018 is 10 ; the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2017 is 12 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
additions for tax positions of prior years 2018: 10
additions for tax positions of prior years 2017: 12
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 10 from 12 which gives subtract(12, 10),
The final logic expression is subtract(12, 10).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total equity in 2009 , in millions of dollars?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2009 is $ 60224 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2008 is $ 78841 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2007 is $ 94737 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between the total assets and the total liabilities .
The required values from the context for the question are:
trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments 2009: $318063
trading assets 2013 derivative receivables 2009: 110457
trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments (a) 2009: $60224
trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables 2009: 77901
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 60224 to 77901 which gives add(60224, 77901)
step 2: add 318063 to 110457 which gives add(318063, 110457)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(add(318063, 110457), add(60224, 77901)),
The final logic expression is subtract(add(318063, 110457), add(60224, 77901)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the operating margin in the 4th quarter
Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 1st qtr is 132 ; the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 2nd qtr is 152 ; the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 3rd qtr is 144 ; the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr ( 3 ) is 79 ; ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 1st qtr is $ 1594 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 2nd qtr is $ 1719 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 3rd qtr is $ 1717 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr ( 3 ) is $ 1927 ;
### Output:
Logic: the operating margin is the operating income divide by the revenues
The required values from the context for the question are:
earnings (loss) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr (3): 79
sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr (3): $1927
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 144 by 1927 which gives divide(144, 1927)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(144, 1927), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(144, 1927), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately between 2006 and 2005 .
Context: the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 5.8 million at february 3 , 2006 and $ 6.3 million at january 28 , 2005 .
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from the recent to most recent divided by the recent multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
excess of current cost over lifo cost at february 3, 2006: $5.8 million
excess of current cost over lifo cost at january 28, 2005: $6.3 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 6.3 from 5.8 which gives subtract(5.8, 6.3)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 6.3 which gives divide(subtract(5.8, 6.3), 6.3)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(5.8, 6.3), 6.3), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(5.8, 6.3), 6.3), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percent growth of borrowings outstanding from 2016 to 2017
Context: the maximum borrowings outstanding of 2017 is 1135 ; the maximum borrowings outstanding of 2016 is 1016 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the difference between the ( end balance and the begin balance ) /begin balance
The required values from the context for the question are:
maximum borrowings outstanding of 2017: 1135
maximum borrowings outstanding of 2016: 1016
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1016 from 1135 which gives subtract(1135, 1016)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1016 which gives divide(subtract(1135, 1016), 1016)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1135, 1016), 1016), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1135, 1016), 1016), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much more money was expensed per outstanding basic weighted-average share in the year ended dec 31 , 2013 compared to the year ended dec 31 , 2014?
Context: ( in millions ) the basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 170.3 ; the basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31 , 2014 is 170.6 ; the basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31 , 2013 ( 1 ) is 156.6 ; a reconciliation of basic weighted-average shares outstanding to diluted weighted-average shares outstanding is as follows: . for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the amounts expensed for these plans were $ 19.8 million , $ 21.9 million and $ 17.3 million , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: divide total number of shares by expenses for 2013 and 2014 . then subtract the 2014 answer from the 2013 answer
The required values from the context for the question are:
basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31, 2015: 170.3
basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31, 2014: 170.6
basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31, 2013: 156.6
amounts expensed for the years ended december 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013: $19.8 million, $21.9 million, $17.3 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 170.6 by 21.9 which gives divide(170.6, 21.9)
step 2: divide 156.6 by 17.3 which gives divide(156.6, 17.3)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(156.6, 17.3), divide(170.6, 21.9)),
The final logic expression is subtract(divide(156.6, 17.3), divide(170.6, 21.9)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total balance in 2018 , if the company was to include interest and penalty liabilities?
Context: the balance at end of fiscal year of 2018 is $ 127.1 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2017 is $ 148.9 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2016 is $ 166.8 ; as of september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 127.1 million and $ 148.9 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits .
### Output:
Logic: in line 6 , it lets the reader know that interest and penalties are not included in the total balance . line 10 gives the total amount of interest and penalties for that period . therefore , to find the total balance you would subtract total balance from table by interest and penalties
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance at end of fiscal year of 2018: $127.1
estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in 2018: $70.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 70.4 from 127.1 which gives subtract(127.1, 70.4),
The final logic expression is subtract(127.1, 70.4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total number of grants were forfeited?
Context: the forfeited of shares is -79 ( 79 ) ; the forfeited of weighted averagegrant-datefair value is 43 ; the forfeited of shares is -91 ( 91 ) ; the forfeited of weighted averagegrant-datefair value is 44 ; the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the years ended may 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( share awards in thousands ) : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .
### Output:
Logic: to figure out the total number of forfeited grants one must added up all the forfeited from the table .
The required values from the context for the question are:
forfeited shares: -79, -91
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 79 to 91 which gives add(79, 91),
The final logic expression is add(79, 91).
### End |