text
stringlengths 601
2.62k
|
|---|
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percent of the professional fees as part of the total re-organization costs
Context: as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at john f . the total reorganization items net of december 31 2013 is $ 2655 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percent is the amount divided by the total multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
reorganization charges on rejected special facility revenue bonds: $180 million
total reorganization items net of december 31 2013: $2655
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1990 by 2655 which gives divide(1990, 2655)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1990, 2655), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1990, 2655), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage difference of consolidated net sales from 2006 to 2008?
Context: in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 40% ( 40 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 52% ( 52 % ) in 2007 and 66% ( 66 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 12099 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 18988 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 28383 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is ( 36 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is ( 33 ) % ( % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage of consolidated net sales from 2006 to 2008 decreased 287% . to figure out this answer one must find out the consolidated net sales from the segmented net sales . you take the percentage given in line 14 and multiple that by the segmented net sales . then minus the 2006 and 2008 consolidated net sales and divide by the 2006 consolidated net sales to get 287% .
The required values from the context for the question are:
segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008: $12099
segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007: $18988
segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006: $28383
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 40% by 12099 which gives multiply(40%, 12099)
step 2: multiply 66% by 28383 which gives multiply(66%, 28383)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099))
step 4: multiply 40% by 12099 which gives multiply(40%, 12099)
step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099)), multiply(40%, 12099))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099)), multiply(40%, 12099)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099)), multiply(40%, 12099)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the total balance in 2018 , if the company was to include interest and penalty liabilities?
Context: the balance at end of fiscal year of 2018 is $ 127.1 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2017 is $ 148.9 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2016 is $ 166.8 ; as of september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 127.1 million and $ 148.9 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits .
### Output:
Logic: in line 6 , it lets the reader know that interest and penalties are not included in the total balance . line 10 gives the total amount of interest and penalties for that period . therefore , to find the total balance you would subtract total balance from table by interest and penalties
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance at end of fiscal year of 2018: $127.1
estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in 2018: $70.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 70.4 from 127.1 which gives subtract(127.1, 70.4),
The final logic expression is subtract(127.1, 70.4).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2015 , what is the percentage of reserves for environmental matters related to remediation of sites?
Context: as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 15.2 million and $ 8.8 million . of these amounts $ 2.8 million and $ 2.4 million , respectively , relate to remediation of sites previously disposed by us .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the reserves for remediation of sites divided by the total value of all reserves for environmental matters.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
reserves for environmental matters for 2015 and 2014: $15.2 million, $8.8 million
reserves related to remediation of sites for 2015 and 2014: $2.8 million, $2.4 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2.8 by 15.2 which gives divide(2.8, 15.2)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2.8, 15.2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2.8, 15.2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the net tax positions for 2012
Context: balance at january 1 2012 the increases in current period tax positions of $ 158578 is 40620 ; balance at january 1 2012 the decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions of $ 158578 is -18205 ( 18205 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the net change in the tax position is the sum of the increase and the decrease
The required values from the context for the question are:
increases in current period tax positions of 2012: 40620
decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions of 2012: -18205
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 40620 to -18205 which gives add(40620, -18205),
The final logic expression is add(40620, -18205).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the growth rate of the loews common stock from december 31 , 2004 to 2009
Context: the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ;
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divide by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
loews common stock of 2004 to 2009: 100.00, 135.92, 179.47, 219.01, 123.70, 160.62
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 160.62 by const_100 which gives divide(160.62, const_100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(160.62, const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(160.62, const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the total research and development for the year 2014 through 2016 in millions
Context: research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the sum of the research and development for the 3 year is the total
The required values from the context for the question are:
research and development expense for the years ended december 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014: $78 million, $119 million, $86 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 78 to 119 which gives add(78, 119)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 86 which gives add(add(78, 119), 86),
The final logic expression is add(add(78, 119), 86).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage change in the weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis from 2016 to 2017
Context: the weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2017 is 1.24% ( 1.24 % ) ; the weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2016 is 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change in weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis ( 1.24-0.78 ) 0.78
The required values from the context for the question are:
weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2017: 1.24%
weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2016: 0.78%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 0.78 from 1.24 which gives subtract(1.24, 0.78)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 0.78 which gives divide(subtract(1.24, 0.78), 0.78),
The final logic expression is divide(subtract(1.24, 0.78), 0.78).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the increase in the unrecognized tax benefits observed during 2007 and 2008 , in millions of dollars?
Context: the balance at december 27 2008 of december 27 2008 is $ 214.4 ; the balance at december 27 2008 of december 29 2007 is $ 126.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the final balance of tax benefits of each year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance at december 27 2008: $214.4
balance at december 29 2007: $126.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 126.6 from 214.4 which gives subtract(214.4, 126.6),
The final logic expression is subtract(214.4, 126.6).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: based on the fair value of the grant , how much money did the company lose when some of their grants were forfeited .
Context: non-vested shares the forfeited of number of shares is -150 ( 150 ) ; the forfeited of weighted-average grant-date fair value is 23.44 ; the number of restricted stock units vested includes shares withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding requirements .
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer one must multiple the average fair value of each grant by the amount of forfeited grants .
The required values from the context for the question are:
forfeited number of shares: -150
weighted-average grant-date fair value of forfeited: 23.44
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 23.44 by 150 which gives multiply(23.44, 150),
The final logic expression is multiply(23.44, 150).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: based on the table , what would be the annual percent return for the companies investments?
Context: the total deferred compensation plan investments 2014 short and long-term of 2010 is $ 8690 ; the total deferred compensation plan investments 2014 short and long-term of 2009 is $ 7943 ; the components of the investments as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 were as follows: . the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses .
### Output:
Logic: to find the amount of percent gained one needs to subtract the two years . then take the answer and divide that by the number from 2009 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2010 investments: $8690
2009 investments: $7943
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 7943 from 8690 which gives subtract(8690, 7943)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7943 which gives divide(subtract(8690, 7943), 7943)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(8690, 7943), 7943), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(8690, 7943), 7943), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of future commitments for service , maintenance and other business enhancement capital expenditure contracts are paid in the first year to the third year?
Context: the other ( 6 ) of total is 1381518 ; the other ( 6 ) of less than1 year is 248107 ; the other ( 6 ) of 1-3 years is 433161 ; the other ( 6 ) of 3-5 years is 354454 ; the other ( 6 ) of more than5 years is 345796 ; ( 6 ) other includes future commitments for service , maintenance and other business enhancement capital expenditure contracts . the total ( 7 ) of total is $ 15973855 ; the total ( 7 ) of less than1 year is $ 2143649 ; the total ( 7 ) of 1-3 years is $ 4915507 ; the total ( 7 ) of 3-5 years is $ 3610120 ; the total ( 7 ) of more than5 years is $ 5304579 ;
### Output:
Logic: to find how much the the other payment was paid in the 1st year to the 3rd year one must divide the payments paid during this period by the total amount of payments .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Other (1-3 years): 433161
Other total: 1381518
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 433161 by 15973855 which gives divide(433161, 15973855)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(433161, 15973855), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(433161, 15973855), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much money did the company pay for the repurchase of shares on non-announced plans or programs?
Context: period the total of total number ofshares purchased ( 1 ) is 1564746 ; the total of average price paidper share ( 2 ) is $ 110.17 ; the total of total number of sharespurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( 3 ) is 1482914 ; the total of approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans or programs is $ 2070927831 ; ( 3 ) shares repurchased pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced on august 12 , 2004 .
### Output:
Logic: the way to find the amount the company spent on non-announced repurchases , one has to subtract the total amount of shares bought by the amount released to the public . then you would multiple the answer by the average purchase price of the total amount of shares .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total number of shares purchased: 1564746
Announced plans shares purchased: 1482914
Average price per share: $110.17
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1482914 from 1564746 which gives subtract(1564746, 1482914)
step 2: multiply 110.17 by the expression of step 1 which gives multiply(110.17, subtract(1564746, 1482914)),
The final logic expression is multiply(110.17, subtract(1564746, 1482914)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: if the remaining securities would be use or exercised at $ 113.49 , what would cost be for the company?
Context: principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item a014 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . plan category the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b ) is 1708928 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights is $ 113.49 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 3629455 ;
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer to the question one must multiple the price by the remaining securities .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of securities: 3629455
Price per security: $113.49
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 113.49 by 3629455 which gives multiply(113.49, 3629455),
The final logic expression is multiply(113.49, 3629455).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2011-2012 , what is the variation observed in the lease obligations?
Context: in millions the lease obligations of 2010 is 177 ; the lease obligations of 2011 is 148 ; the lease obligations of 2012 is 124 ; the lease obligations of 2013 is 96 ; the lease obligations of 2014 is 79 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 184 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Lease obligations 2011: 148
Lease obligations 2012: 124
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 124 from 148 which gives subtract(148, 124),
The final logic expression is subtract(148, 124).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of the purchase was in cash?
Context: cash portion of consideration the total estimated purchase price of $ 2094800 is $ 6156900 ; ( i ) purchase price the purchase price is as follows: .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of the purchase was cash one must divide the amount in cash paid for the purchase by the total cost of the purchase .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Estimated purchase price: $2094800
Cash portion: $6156900
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2094800 by 6156900 which gives divide(2094800, 6156900)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2094800, 6156900), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2094800, 6156900), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2008 , how much percent did the board of directors increase the share repurchase program .
Context: on august 21 , 2018 , the board of directors approved an increase to the current authorization for the stock repurchase program by an additional $ 2.0 billion to $ 8.2 billion in the aggregate . under the repurchase program , we may repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock froff m time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions .
### Output:
Logic: one can find out the answer by subtracting the new total from the amount that the board of directors raised the program by . then take the amount the board of directors raised the program by and divide that by the answer to the last step .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increase in repurchase program: $2.0 billion
New total repurchase program: $8.2 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_2 from 8.2 which gives subtract(8.2, const_2)
step 2: divide const_2 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(const_2, subtract(8.2, const_2))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(const_2, subtract(8.2, const_2)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(const_2, subtract(8.2, const_2)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much did interest with libor change from year 1 to years 3-5?
Context: the interest ( 5 ) of total is 974444 ; the interest ( 5 ) of less than1 year is 222427 ; the interest ( 5 ) of 1-3 years is 404380 ; the interest ( 5 ) of 3-5 years is 165172 ; the interest ( 5 ) of more than5 years is 182465 ; off-balance sheet transactions contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2018 , our contractual obligations with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year , including interest payments on long-term debt obligations , were as follows ( in thousands ) : less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years more than 5 years .
### Output:
Logic: to find how much the interest rate changed one must subtract the interest from year 1 by the interest from years 3-5 . then divide the answer by the interest from year 1 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest year 1: 222427
Interest years 3-5: 165172
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 222427 from 165172 which gives subtract(165172, 222427)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 222427 which gives divide(subtract(165172, 222427), 222427),
The final logic expression is divide(subtract(165172, 222427), 222427).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2010-2011 , what is the percentual increase observed in the maturities of long-term debt?
Context: in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 304 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 574 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2012 is $ 199 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2013 is $ 131 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 562 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 7263 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of 2011 divided by the 2010's , then turned into a percentage to represent the percentual growth .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term debt 2010: $304
Long-term debt 2011: $574
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 574 by 304 which gives divide(574, 304)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(574, 304), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(574, 304), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(574, 304), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of long-term debt was paid off in 2021?
Context: year the 2021 of amount is 2549621 ; year the total of amount is $ 6609866 ; principal and interest payments are payable semiannually .
### Output:
Logic: to find the amount of long-term debt was paid off in 2021 , one has to take the payment in 2021 and divide it by the total amount of long-term debt payments .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2021 amount: 2549621
Total amount: $6609866
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2549621 by 6609866 which gives divide(2549621, 6609866)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2549621, 6609866), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2549621, 6609866), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: during the purchase , what was the per share value of the hologic common stock
Context: the aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 6156900 included $ 2094800 in cash ; 132038 shares of hologic common stock at an estimated fair value of $ 3671500 ; 16465 of fully vested stock options granted to cytyc employees in exchange for their vested cytyc stock options , with an estimated fair value of approximately $ 241400 ; the fair value of cytyc 2019s outstanding convertible notes assumed in the merger of approximately $ 125000 ; and approximately $ 24200 of direct acquisition costs .
### Output:
Logic: to find the per share value of the stock one must divide the cost of the shares by the total number of shares purchased .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Purchase price of common stock: $3671500
Number of shares: 132038
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 3671500 by 132038 which gives divide(3671500, 132038),
The final logic expression is divide(3671500, 132038).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percentage of warehouse locations are in north america?
Context: in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan . in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan .
### Output:
Logic: the increase would be 21.3% because 16 ( number of north american warehouses ) divided by the total amount of warehouses .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total warehouse locations: 75
Warehouse locations in North America: 16
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 16 by 75 which gives divide(16, 75)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(16, 75), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(16, 75), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage reduction in the loews common stock from 2013 to 2014
Context: the loews common stock of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews common stock of 2011 is 97.37 ; the loews common stock of 2012 is 106.04 ; the loews common stock of 2013 is 126.23 ; the loews common stock of 2014 is 110.59 ; the loews common stock of 2015 is 101.72 ;
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the first period
The required values from the context for the question are:
Loews common stock in 2013: 126.23
Loews common stock in 2014: 110.59
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 126.23 from 110.59 which gives subtract(110.59, 126.23)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 126.23 which gives divide(subtract(110.59, 126.23), 126.23)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(110.59, 126.23), 126.23), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(110.59, 126.23), 126.23), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2009 , what is the percentage of the segment's operating income among the total operating income?
Context: years ended december 31 , the segment operating income of 2009 is 203 ; the segment operating income of 2008 is 208 ; the segment operating income of 2007 is 180 ; operating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the operating income of the segment divided by the total , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment operating income in 2009: 203
Total operating income in 2009: 900
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 203 by 900 which gives divide(203, 900)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(203, 900), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(203, 900), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the reverse stock split , what was the percentual reduction of the common stock outstanding shares?
Context: the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .
### Output:
Logic: it is the new number of shares divided by the total , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage , which is going to represent the reduction .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of shares before reverse stock split: 1.3 billion
Number of shares after reverse stock split: 0.4 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 0.4 by 1.3 which gives divide(0.4, 1.3)
step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from const_1 which gives subtract(const_1, divide(0.4, 1.3))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(const_1, divide(0.4, 1.3)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(const_1, divide(0.4, 1.3)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what is the decrease observed in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans?
Context: during 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the final value of cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments minus the initial one , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash contributions & benefit payments in 2016: $137.5
Cash contributions & benefit payments in 2015: $79.3
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 137.5 from 79.3 which gives subtract(79.3, 137.5)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 137.5 which gives divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percent of the square feet in owned facilities in other countries?
Context: ( square feet in millions ) the owned facilities1 of unitedstates is 29.9 ; the owned facilities1 of othercountries is 16.7 ; the owned facilities1 of total is 46.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: 35.8% of the square feet in owned facilities in other countries?
The required values from the context for the question are:
Square feet in owned facilities in other countries: 16.7 million
Total square feet in owned facilities: 46.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 16.7 by 46.6 which gives divide(16.7, 46.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(16.7, 46.6), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(16.7, 46.6), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the cash flow result?
Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2019 is $ 2969.9 ; the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2547.2 ; cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2019 is -2113.4 ( 2113.4 ) ; the investing activities of 2018 is -1641.6 ( 1641.6 ) ; cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2019 is -1370.5 ( 1370.5 ) ; the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the cash provided by all activities , but considering the investing and financial ones as negative values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash flow from operating activities in 2018: $2547.2
Cash flow from investing activities in 2018: -$1641.6
Cash flow from financing activities in 2018: -$1359.8
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1641.6 from 2547.2 which gives subtract(2547.2, 1641.6)
step 2: subtract 1359.8 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(2547.2, 1641.6), 1359.8),
The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(2547.2, 1641.6), 1359.8).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation between the average and the highest operating margin?
Context: years ended december 31 the operating margin of 2014 is 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 7.8% ( 7.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the maximum and average values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating margin in 2014: 11.4%
Operating margin in 2013: 7.8%
Operating margin in 2012: 7.4%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract table_average(operating margin, none) from table_max(operating margin, none) which gives subtract(table_max(operating margin, none), table_average(operating margin, none))
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(table_max(operating margin, none), table_average(operating margin, none)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(table_max(operating margin, none), table_average(operating margin, none)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how many total votes can the class b-3 provide in 2017?
Context: ( in thousands ) the class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2017 is 1.3 ; the class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2016 is 1.3 ; each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .
### Output:
Logic: its the result of the multiplication between the number of class b-3 shares ( 1300 ) and the number of votes provided by each one .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Class b-3 common stock in 2017: 1.3 thousand
Votes per class b-3 common stock: 1
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply const_1000 by 1.3 which gives multiply(const_1000, 1.3)
step 2: multiply const_1 by the expression of step 1 which gives multiply(const_1, multiply(const_1000, 1.3)),
The final logic expression is multiply(const_1, multiply(const_1000, 1.3)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the estimated percentual decrease observed in the htm investment securities from 2017 to 2018 ? .
Context: as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the htm investment securities ( period-end ) of 2018 is 31434 ; the htm investment securities ( period-end ) of 2017 is 47733 ; the htm investment securities ( period-end ) of 2016 is 50168 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the percentage of the decrease ( the value's variation between 2018 and 2017 ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
HTM investment securities in 2018: 31434
HTM investment securities in 2017: 47733
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 31434 from 47733 which gives subtract(47733, 31434)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 47733 which gives divide(subtract(47733, 31434), 47733)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(47733, 31434), 47733), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(47733, 31434), 47733), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?
Context: the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 400.6 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; the operating income of 2011 is 62.8 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of sales divided by the operating income .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Sales in 2013: $451.1
Operating income in 2013: 65.5
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 451.1 by 65.5 which gives divide(451.1, 65.5),
The final logic expression is divide(451.1, 65.5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the lowest segment operating income?
Context: years ended december 31 , the segment operating income of 2009 is 900 ; the segment operating income of 2008 is 846 ; the segment operating income of 2007 is 954 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum operating income .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment operating income in 2009: 900
Segment operating income in 2008: 846
Segment operating income in 2007: 954
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_min(segment operating income, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the growth of the additions in comparison with the growth of the deductions during 2003 and 2004?
Context: balance december 31 2002 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 450697000 is 68125000 ; balance december 31 2002 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 450697000 is -4645000 ( 4645000 ) ; balance december 31 2002 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 450697000 is 82551000 ; balance december 31 2002 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 450697000 is -1390000 ( 1390000 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between each percentual variation during 2003 and 2004 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Additions during 2003: $68125000
Deductions during 2003: $-4645000
Additions during 2004: $82551000
Deductions during 2004: $-1390000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1390000 by 4645000 which gives divide(1390000, 4645000)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1)
step 3: divide 82551000 by 68125000 which gives divide(82551000, 68125000)
step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1)
step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1), subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1), subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1), subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what are the total amount of net tangible assets obtained through the acquisition?
Context: cash the goodwill of $ 45826 is 203828 ; cash the total purchase consideration of $ 45826 is $ 265982 ; goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .
### Output:
Logic: the net total amount of assets that were tangible in the acquisition , can be found by subtracting the total amount of money spent by the goodwill or intangible assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill: $203.8 million
Total purchase consideration: $265982
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 203828 from 265982 which gives subtract(265982, 203828),
The final logic expression is subtract(265982, 203828).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2016 , what was the percentual increase in the high sale price observed during the first and second quarters?
Context: quarter the first of 2016 high is $ 30.66 ; the first of 2016 low is $ 18.42 ; the first of 2016 dividend is $ 0.09 ; the first of 2016 high is $ 51.30 ; the first of 2016 low is $ 37.95 ; the first of dividend is $ 0.09 ; quarter the second of 2016 high is 34.50 ; the second of 2016 low is 26.34 ; the second of 2016 dividend is 0.09 ; the second of 2016 high is 42.87 ; the second of 2016 low is 33.45 ; the second of dividend is 0.09 ; the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the high sale price of the second quarter divided by the high sale price of the first one , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
High sale price first quarter 2016: $30.66 and $51.30 (There seems to be two values provided for the high sale price in the first quarter. This discrepancy needs to be addressed.)
High sale price second quarter 2016: $34.50 and $42.87 (Again, two values provided)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 34.50 by 30.66 which gives divide(34.50, 30.66)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(34.50, 30.66), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(34.50, 30.66), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(34.50, 30.66), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components
Context: the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointincrease is $ 7367 ; the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointdecrease is $ -5974 ( 5974 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components is the sum of 7367 and -5974 equal to 1393
The required values from the context for the question are:
One-percentage-point increase effect: $7367
One-percentage-point decrease effect: $-5974
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 7367 to -5974 which gives add(7367, -5974),
The final logic expression is add(7367, -5974).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the variation between the capital expenditures on a gaap basis and the one on a non-gaap basis?
Context: the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1682.2 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1747.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2559.8 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1885.1 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1996.7 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2778.3 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between each capital expenditures value , concerning gaap or non-gaap basis .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Capital expenditures on a GAAP basis 2014: $1682.2
Capital expenditures on a non-GAAP basis 2014: $1885.1
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1682.2 from 1885.1 which gives subtract(1885.1, 1682.2),
The final logic expression is subtract(1885.1, 1682.2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the fair market value of plan assets in 2018 , what is its estimated return for 10 years?
Context: the weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets of 2018 is 6.9% ( 6.9 % ) ; the weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets of 2017 is 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) ; the weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets of 2016 is 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) ; the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2018 measurement date decreased to $ 4273.1 from $ 4409.2 at the end of fiscal year 2017 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the fair value calculated in the compound interest formula , in which the rate of return on plan assets is the interest rate and the 10 years is the period .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected rate of return on plan assets 2018: 6.9%
Fair market value of plan assets 2018: $4273.1
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 4273.1 by exp(add(const_1, divide(6.9%, const_100)), 10) which gives multiply(4273.1, exp(add(const_1, divide(6.9%, const_100)), 10)),
The final logic expression is multiply(4273.1, exp(add(const_1, divide(6.9%, const_100)), 10)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of assets acquired by the acquisition are non-tangible assets?
Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the customer-related intangible assets of total is 4091 ; the contract-based intangible assets of total is 1031 ; the property and equipment of total is 267 ; the other current assets of total is 502 ; the total assets acquired of total is 19427 ; the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .
### Output:
Logic: the non-tangible assets are considered customer-related intangible assets , goodwill , and contract-based intangible assets . to get to the answer , one must add up these 3 numbers and divide the total by the total assets.\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill: $13536
Customer-related intangible assets: $4091
Contract-based intangible assets: $1031
Total assets acquired: $19427
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 13536 to 4091 which gives add(13536, 4091)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1031 which gives add(add(13536, 4091), 1031)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 19427 which gives divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the return on total assets during 2013?
Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2017 is 479 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2016 is 573 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2015 is 404 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2014 is 338 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 is 261 ; ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total assets of year ended december 31 2017 is 6374 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2016 is 6352 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2015 is 6024 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2014 is 6239 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2013 is 6190 ;
### Output:
Logic: net income over total assets
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net earnings 2013: $261
Total assets 2013: $6190
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 261 by 6190 which gives divide(261, 6190)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(261, 6190), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(261, 6190), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what percent of assets acquired by the acquisition are non-tangible assets?
Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the customer-related intangible assets of total is 4091 ; the contract-based intangible assets of total is 1031 ; the property and equipment of total is 267 ; the other current assets of total is 502 ; the total assets acquired of total is 19427 ; the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .
### Output:
Logic: the non-tangible assets are considered customer-related intangible assets , goodwill , and contract-based intangible assets . to get to the answer , one must add up these 3 numbers and divide the total by the total assets.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill: $13536
Customer-related intangible assets: $4091
Contract-based intangible assets: $1031
Total assets acquired: $19427
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 13536 to 4091 which gives add(13536, 4091)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1031 which gives add(add(13536, 4091), 1031)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 19427 which gives divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the gaap basis , what was the growth observed in the effective tax rate during 2012 and 2013?
Context: 2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between these effective tax rates during 2012 and 2013 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Effective tax rate 2012 on a GAAP basis: 22.8%
Effective tax rate 2013 on a GAAP basis: 21.9%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21.9% from 22.8% which gives subtract(22.8%, 21.9%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(22.8%, 21.9%), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(22.8%, 21.9%), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the percentual increase observed in the payment amount per share?
Context: paymentdate the 2016 of amountper share is $ 1.16 ; the 2016 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 172 ; paymentdate the 2017 of amountper share is $ 1.49 ; the 2017 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 216 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the payment amount per share in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then transformed into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Payment amount per share 2016: $1.16
Payment amount per share 2017: $1.49
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1.49 by 1.16 which gives divide(1.49, 1.16)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1.49, 1.16), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1.49, 1.16), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1.49, 1.16), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentual increase of other income due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements in 2011?
Context: 2011 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.1 increased $ 5.4 , primarily due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements from government grants for expense , partially offset by lower gains from the sale of assets .
### Output:
Logic: it is the income variation divided by the initial income in the year 2011 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2011 other income (expense): $47.1
Increase: $5.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 5.4 by 47.1 which gives divide(5.4, 47.1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(5.4, 47.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(5.4, 47.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2017 what was the debt to equity based on the 2017 actual asset allocation
Context: the debt securities of targetassetallocation is 72% ( 72 % ) ; the debt securities of 2017actualassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the debt securities of 2016actualassetallocation is 72% ( 72 % ) ; the equity securities of targetassetallocation is 28 ; the equity securities of 2017actualassetallocation is 30 ; the equity securities of 2016actualassetallocation is 28 ;
### Output:
Logic: the debt to equity is the ratio of the debts that show how much the company borrows compared to internal financing
The required values from the context for the question are:
2017 actual asset allocation (debt securities): 70% (70%)
2017 actual asset allocation (equity securities): 30
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 70 by 30 which gives divide(70, 30),
The final logic expression is divide(70, 30).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the overall growth of the s&p 500 index from 2010 to 2015
Context: the s&p 500 index of 2010 is 100.0 ; the s&p 500 index of 2011 is 102.11 ; the s&p 500 index of 2012 is 118.45 ; the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 156.82 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 178.29 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 180.75 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2011 is 101.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2012 is 115.19 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2013 is 145.12 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2014 is 152.84 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2015 is 144.70 ;
### Output:
Logic: to test for growth you divide the change by the earliest amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
s&p 500 index 2010: 100.0
s&p 500 index 2015: 180.75
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100.0 from 180.75 which gives subtract(180.75, 100.0)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(180.75, 100.0), const_100)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(180.75, 100.0), const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(180.75, 100.0), const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average of the afs investment securities during the years 2016-2018?
Context: as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the afs investment securities ( period-end ) of 2018 is 228681 ; the afs investment securities ( period-end ) of 2017 is 200247 ; the afs investment securities ( period-end ) of 2016 is 236670 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the average of afs investment securities during those 3 years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
AFS investment securities 2018: 228681
AFS investment securities 2017: 200247
AFS investment securities 2016: 236670
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 228681 to 200247 which gives add(228681, 200247)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 236670 which gives add(add(228681, 200247), 236670)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(228681, 200247), 236670), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(add(228681, 200247), 236670), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average price per share of the company 2019s common stock in the third quarter of 2016?
Context: quarter the third of 2016 high is 32.91 ; the third of 2016 low is 27.09 ; the third of 2016 dividend is 0.09 ; the third of 2016 high is 33.69 ; the third of 2016 low is 23.91 ; the third of dividend is 0.09 ; the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the high sale price and the low sale price divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Third quarter 2016 high: 32.91
Third quarter 2016 low: 27.09
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 32.91 to 27.09 which gives add(32.91, 27.09)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(32.91, 27.09), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(32.91, 27.09), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year during 2005 and 2004?
Context: balance december 31 2002 the balance december 31 2004 of $ 450697000 is 595338000 ; balance december 31 2002 the balance december 31 2005 of $ 450697000 is $ 663750000 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual increase observed during this period , which is calculated by dividing the final value ( balance at 2005 ) by the initial value ( balance of 2004 ) , then subtracting 1 and turning it into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance December 31 2004: 595338000
Balance December 31 2005: $663750000
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 663750000 by 595338000 which gives divide(663750000, 595338000)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(663750000, 595338000), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(663750000, 595338000), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(663750000, 595338000), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the value of the treasury stock as of december 312007
Context: the december 1 through december 31 of number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) is 14669 ; the december 1 through december 31 of average price per share is $ 43.89 ;
### Output:
Logic: the value of the treasury stock is the amount of shares bought back at the given price
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of shares repurchased (December): 14669
Average price per share (December): $43.89
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 14669 by 43.89 which gives multiply(14669, 43.89),
The final logic expression is multiply(14669, 43.89).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: on december 312013 what was the net profit margin
Context: the net income of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is 2526 ; the revenue of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is $ 40678 ;
### Output:
Logic: the net profit margin the ratio of the net income to the revenues
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net income December 31 2013: 2526
Revenue December 31 2013: $40678
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2526 by 40678 which gives divide(2526, 40678)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2526, 40678), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2526, 40678), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the state of minnesota , what is the percentage of commercial/industrial customers concerning the total customers?
Context: the minnesota of residential is 738868 ; the minnesota of commercial/industrial is 67489 ; the minnesota of total customers is 806357 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of commercial/industrial customers divided by the total number of customers in minnesota .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Minnesota residential customers: 738868
Minnesota commercial/industrial customers: 67489
Minnesota total customers: 806357
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 67489 by 806357 which gives divide(67489, 806357)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(67489, 806357), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(67489, 806357), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what were net trading assets from derivatives in 2012 , in millions?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2013 is 72629 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2012 is 85744 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2011 is 90003 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2013 is 64553 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2012 is 76162 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2011 is 71539 ;
### Output:
Logic: net = assets minus liab .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Trading assets 2012 derivative receivables: 85744
Trading liabilities 2012 derivative payables: 76162
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 76162 from 85744 which gives subtract(85744, 76162),
The final logic expression is subtract(85744, 76162).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the current ratio?
Context: current assets the current assets of $ 28.1 is $ 28.1 ; current assets the current liabilities assumed of $ 28.1 is -32.9 ( 32.9 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: current ratio = current assets/current liabilities . it says it is invalid but ( ) means -
The required values from the context for the question are:
Current assets: $28.1
Current liabilities: -32.9 (32.9)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 28.1 by -32.9 which gives divide(28.1, -32.9),
The final logic expression is divide(28.1, -32.9).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the lowest interest incurred observed?
Context: the interest incurred of 2016 is $ 148.4 ; the interest incurred of 2015 is $ 152.6 ; the interest incurred of 2014 is $ 158.1 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value of interest incurred observed during these years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2016 interest incurred: $148.4
2015 interest incurred: $152.6
2014 interest incurred: $158.1
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_min(interest incurred, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the operating margin for 2012?
Context: the sales of 2014 is $ 450.4 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the operating income of 2014 is 88.2 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2012 , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2012 sales: $420.1
2012 operating income: 44.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 44.6 by 420.1 which gives divide(44.6, 420.1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(44.6, 420.1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(44.6, 420.1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average cash provided by the operating activities during 2018 and 2019?
Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2019 is $ 2969.9 ; the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2547.2 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the operating activities of 2018 and 2019 divided by two ( the number of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2019 operating activities: $2969.9
2018 operating activities: $2547.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(operating activities, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the combined number of equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 448859 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights is $ 0.00 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4087587 ;
### Output:
Logic: the combined number is the sum of the two numbers of securities
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of securities (a) (b): 448859
Number of securities (c): 4087587
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 448859 to 4087587 which gives add(448859, 4087587),
The final logic expression is add(448859, 4087587).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2012 , how bigger is the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis than the one on a gaap basis?
Context: the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1682.2 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1747.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2559.8 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1885.1 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1996.7 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2778.3 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis divided by the one on a gaap basis , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2012 capital expenditures (GAAP): $2559.8
2012 capital expenditures (non-GAAP): $2778.3
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2778.3 by 2559.8 which gives divide(2778.3, 2559.8)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(2778.3, 2559.8), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(2778.3, 2559.8), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(2778.3, 2559.8), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2019 , what is the contribution of the first quarter in the total dividend?
Context: the first quarter of 2019 is $ 1.10 ; the first quarter of 2018 is $ .95 ; the total of 2019 is $ 4.58 ; the total of 2018 is $ 4.25 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the first quarter dividend divided by the total value of all dividends , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
First quarter 2019: $1.10
Total 2019: $4.58
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1.10 by 4.58 which gives divide(1.10, 4.58)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.10, 4.58), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.10, 4.58), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the anticipated amount of revenues from the of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 in billions
Context: we expect approximately 28% ( 28 % ) of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 .
### Output:
Logic: given the percent to obtain the amount you multiply the percent by the total
The required values from the context for the question are:
28% of $21 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 21 by 28% which gives multiply(21, 28%),
The final logic expression is multiply(21, 28%).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the highest interest expense observed?
Context: the interest expense of 2016 is $ 115.5 ; the interest expense of 2015 is $ 103.5 ; the interest expense of 2014 is $ 125.1 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value of the interest expense observed during these years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2016 interest expense: $115.5
2015 interest expense: $103.5
2014 interest expense: $125.1
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_max(interest expense, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the first quarter dividend percentage concerning the total value , during 2018 and 2019?
Context: the first quarter of 2019 is $ 1.10 ; the first quarter of 2018 is $ .95 ; the total of 2019 is $ 4.58 ; the total of 2018 is $ 4.25 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those percentages , which are calculated by dividing the value of the first quarter divided by the total value of dividends .
The required values from the context for the question are:
First quarter 2019: $1.10
First quarter 2018: $.95
Total 2019: $4.58
Total 2018: $4.25
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide .95 by 4.25 which gives divide(.95, 4.25)
step 2: divide 1.10 by 4.58 which gives divide(1.10, 4.58)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25)), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25)), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in millions for 2013 , what were net trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments?
Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2013 is $ 340449 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2012 is $ 349337 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2011 is $ 393890 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) of 2013 is 77706 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) of 2012 is 69001 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) of 2011 is 81916 ;
### Output:
Logic: net - assets minus liab .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2013 trading assets (debt and equity instruments): $340449
2013 trading liabilities (debt and equity instruments): 77706
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 77706 from 340449 which gives subtract(340449, 77706),
The final logic expression is subtract(340449, 77706).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the mathematical range for european cruise guests from 2010-2014?
Context: year the 2010 of weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) is 391000 ; the 2010 of royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths is 92300 ; the 2010 of globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) is 18800000 ; the 2010 of north americancruiseguests ( 2 ) is 10781000 ; the 2010 of europeancruiseguests ( 3 ) is 5540000 ; year the 2014 of weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) is 448000 ; the 2014 of royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths is 105750 ; the 2014 of globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) is 22006063 ; the 2014 of north americancruiseguests ( 2 ) is 12260238 ; the 2014 of europeancruiseguests ( 3 ) is 6535365 ; total berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) .
### Output:
Logic: largest number - smallest number in group
The required values from the context for the question are:
2010 European cruise guests: 5540000
2014 European cruise guests: 6535365
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 5540000 from 6535365 which gives subtract(6535365, 5540000),
The final logic expression is subtract(6535365, 5540000).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the increase observed in the total revenue during 2010 and 2011?
Context: years ended december 31 the total revenue of 2011 is $ 11287 ; the total revenue of 2010 is $ 8512 ; the total revenue of 2009 is $ 7595 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the total revenue of 2011 divided by the 2010's , then transformed into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total revenue 2011: $11287
Total revenue 2010: $8512
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 11287 by 8512 which gives divide(11287, 8512)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(11287, 8512), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(11287, 8512), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(11287, 8512), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the ratio of the acquisition related costs recognized in 2015 to 2014
Context: simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements . the company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: the ratio of the acquisition related costs for 2015 to 2014 was 0.75 to 1
The required values from the context for the question are:
Acquisition related costs 03/31/2015: $0.6 million
Acquisition related costs 12/31/2014: $0.8 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 0.6 by 0.8 which gives divide(0.6, 0.8),
The final logic expression is divide(0.6, 0.8).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the lowest segment operating income margin?
Context: years ended december 31 , the segment operating income margin of 2009 is 16.0% ( 16.0 % ) ; the segment operating income margin of 2008 is 15.3% ( 15.3 % ) ; the segment operating income margin of 2007 is 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value of the segment operating income margin .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment operating income margin 2009: 16.0%
Segment operating income margin 2008: 15.3%
Segment operating income margin 2007: 13.4%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply table_min(segment operating income margin, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_min(segment operating income margin, none), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(table_min(segment operating income margin, none), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the short-term debt as a percent of total debt?
Context: 30 september the short-term borrowings of 2016 is $ 935.8 ; the short-term borrowings of 2015 is $ 1494.3 ; 30 september the current portion of long-term debt of 2016 is 371.3 ; the current portion of long-term debt of 2015 is 435.6 ; 30 september the total debt of 2016 is $ 6225.2 ; the total debt of 2015 is $ 5879.0 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all short-term debts divided by the total debt and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Short-term borrowings 2016: $935.8
Total debt 2016: $6225.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 935.8 to 371.3 which gives add(935.8, 371.3)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 6225.2 which gives divide(add(935.8, 371.3), 6225.2)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(935.8, 371.3), 6225.2), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(935.8, 371.3), 6225.2), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the operating margin for 2014?
Context: the sales of 2014 is $ 450.4 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the operating income of 2014 is 88.2 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2014 , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Sales 2014: $450.4
Operating income 2014: 88.2
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 88.2 by 450.4 which gives divide(88.2, 450.4)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(88.2, 450.4), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(88.2, 450.4), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the highest value for total operating segments during this period?
Context: years ended december 31 the total operating segments of 2011 is 11287 ; the total operating segments of 2010 is 8512 ; the total operating segments of 2009 is 7546 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total operating segments 2011: 11287
Total operating segments 2010: 8512
Total operating segments 2009: 7546
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_max(total operating segments, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentual increase in the operating expenses during 2017 and 2018?
Context: the pension expense 2013 continuing operations of 2018 is $ 91.8 ; the pension expense 2013 continuing operations of 2017 is $ 72.0 ; the pension expense 2013 continuing operations of 2016 is $ 55.8 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the final value of the operating expenses in 2018 divided by the 2017's , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Pension expense 2018: $91.8
Pension expense 2017: $72.0
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 91.8 by 72.0 which gives divide(91.8, 72.0)
step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(91.8, 72.0), const_1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(91.8, 72.0), const_1), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(91.8, 72.0), const_1), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2011-2013 , what is the average capital expenditure on a gaap basis?
Context: the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1747.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2559.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2011 is $ 1365.9 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all capital expenditures on a gaap basis divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Capital expenditures (GAAP basis) 2013: $1747.8
Capital expenditures (GAAP basis) 2012: $2559.8
Capital expenditures (GAAP basis) 2011: $1365.9
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(capital expenditures on a gaap basis, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the number of shares outstanding as of december 31 , 2007
Context: as of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record . the december 1 through december 31 of number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) is 14669 ; the december 1 through december 31 of average price per share is $ 43.89 ;
### Output:
Logic: the outstanding common stock is the stock less and repurchase
The required values from the context for the question are:
Common stock outstanding 02/15/2008: 138311810 shares
Number of shares repurchased December 2007: 14669
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 14669 from 138311810 which gives subtract(138311810, 14669),
The final logic expression is subtract(138311810, 14669).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percent of the total backlog for ingalls as part of the total backlog
Context: ( $ in millions ) the ingalls of december 31 2014 funded is $ 5609 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 1889 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 total backlog is $ 7498 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 funded is $ 6335 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 2570 ; the ingalls of total backlog is $ 8905 ; ( $ in millions ) the total backlog of december 31 2014 funded is $ 11832 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 9598 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 total backlog is $ 21430 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 funded is $ 11830 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 6208 ; the total backlog of total backlog is $ 18038 ;
### Output:
Logic: to get the percent you divide the amount in question by the total and multiply by 100
The required values from the context for the question are:
Ingalls backlog 12/31/2014: $7498
Total backlog 12/31/2014: $21430
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 8905 by 18038 which gives divide(8905, 18038)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(8905, 18038), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(8905, 18038), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what was the average cash paid for interest?
Context: cash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. .
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all cash paid for interest during these years divided by three ( number of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash paid for interest 2016: $121.1
Cash paid for interest 2015: $97.5
Cash paid for interest 2014: $132.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 121.1 to 97.5 which gives add(121.1, 97.5)
step 2: add 132.4 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(132.4, add(121.1, 97.5))
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(132.4, add(121.1, 97.5)), const_3),
The final logic expression is divide(add(132.4, add(121.1, 97.5)), const_3).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: in 2009 what was the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts
Context: the additions charged to expense of 2009 is 27.3 ; the additions charged to expense of 2008 is 36.5 ; the additions charged to expense of 2007 is 3.9 ; the accounts written-off of 2009 is -37.8 ( 37.8 ) ; the accounts written-off of 2008 is -12.7 ( 12.7 ) ; the accounts written-off of 2007 is -7.8 ( 7.8 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: the change is the difference in the amounts for the specified periods
The required values from the context for the question are:
Additions charged to expense of 2009: 27.3
Accounts written-off of 2009: -37.8
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 27.3 to -37.8 which gives add(27.3, -37.8),
The final logic expression is add(27.3, -37.8).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much did the lease obligations drop from 2004 to 2011?
Context: ( in millions ) the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is 2328 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is 351 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is 281 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is 209 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is 178 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011 is 158 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is 1151 ; at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . ( in millions ) the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is 1035 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is 326 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is 120 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is 26 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is 12 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011 is 12 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is 539 ;
### Output:
Logic: the lease obligations for 2004 are given in line 13 . to find the difference take the lease obligations for 2004 and subtract lease obligations for 2011 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Lease obligations of 2004 (given as future obligations at the end of 2006): 2.3 billion
Lease obligations of 2011: 158
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 120 from 205 which gives subtract(205, 120),
The final logic expression is subtract(205, 120).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the state of arkansas , what is the percentage of residential customers concerning the total customers?
Context: the arkansas of residential is 390668 ; the arkansas of commercial/industrial is 48033 ; the arkansas of total customers is 438701 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of residential customers divided by the total number of customers in arkansas .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Arkansas residential customers: 390668
Arkansas total customers: 438701
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 390668 by 438701 which gives divide(390668, 438701)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(390668, 438701), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(390668, 438701), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2013 and 2014 , what is the basis point variation observed in the operating margin?
Context: years ended december 31 the operating margin of 2014 is 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 7.8% ( 7.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those operating margins , then multiplied by 100 to transform into a basis point .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating margin of 2014: 11.4%
Operating margin of 2013: 7.8%
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 7.8% from 11.4% which gives subtract(11.4%, 7.8%)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(subtract(11.4%, 7.8%), const_100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(11.4%, 7.8%), const_100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2015 , what was the lowest return for the investment?
Context: the allegion plc of november 18 2013 is 100.00 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2013 is 91.16 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2014 is 115.11 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2015 is 137.71 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2016 is 134.67 ; the s&p 500 of november 18 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2013 is 103.44 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2014 is 117.59 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2015 is 119.22 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2016 is 133.48 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of november 18 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2013 is 105.46 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2014 is 105.72 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2015 is 99.90 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2016 is 131.80 ; performance graph the annual changes for the period shown november 18 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading in the "when-issued" market ) to december 31 , 2016 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( "s&p 500" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( "s&p 400 capital goods" ) on november 18 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested .
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value of the investment in that year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Allegion plc of December 31, 2015: 137.71
S&P 500 of December 31, 2015: 119.22
S&P 400 Capital Goods of December 31, 2015: 99.90
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 99.90 which gives subtract(99.90, 100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(99.90, 100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(99.90, 100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of the common stock repurchase among the total program of repurchases?
Context: on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the common stock repurchases divided by the total value of the program , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Common stock repurchase: $1.5 billion
Total repurchase program: $2.25 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1.5 by 2.25 which gives divide(1.5, 2.25)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.5, 2.25), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.5, 2.25), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of decrease of long-term debt from 2007 to 2011?
Context: ( in millions ) the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is $ 4134 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is $ 1340 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is $ 198 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is $ 4 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is $ 534 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011 is $ 607 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is $ 1451 ; contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .
### Output:
Logic: the decrease of long term debt from 2007 to 2011 was 54.7% . this was calculated by subtracting 2007 from 2011 long term debt . then taking the answer and dividing it by the long term debt of 2007 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term debt obligations of 2007: $1340 million
Long-term debt obligations of 2011: $607 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 607 from 1340 which gives subtract(1340, 607)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1340 which gives divide(subtract(1340, 607), 1340)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1340, 607), 1340), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1340, 607), 1340), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: as of december 312012 what was the outstanding amount of share repurchase authorized in billions?
Context: schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 .
### Output:
Logic: the outstanding amount is the amount authorized less the amount repurchased
The required values from the context for the question are:
Share repurchased as of December 31, 2012: $7.12 billion
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 7.12 from const_8 which gives subtract(const_8, 7.12),
The final logic expression is subtract(const_8, 7.12).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the 2016's special terminations settlements and curtailments , what is the percentage of pension settlement losses concerning the total value?
Context: the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2016 is 7.3 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2015 is 35.2 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2014 is 5.8 ; special items of $ 7.3 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , special termination benefits of $ 2.0 , and curtailment gains of $ 1.1 .
### Output:
Logic: it is the pension settlement losses value divided by the total special terminations settlements and curtailments , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Special terminations settlements and curtailments of 2016: 7.3
Pension settlement losses of 2016: 6.4
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 6.4 by 7.3 which gives divide(6.4, 7.3)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(6.4, 7.3), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(6.4, 7.3), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how much money can the company deduct on the income tax in the future after this acquisition?
Context: cash the customer-related intangible assets of $ 45826 is 42721 ; cash the acquired technology of $ 45826 is 27954 ; cash the trade name of $ 45826 is 2901 ; goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets . goodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years . the trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .
### Output:
Logic: the amortized acquired assets would be considered deductible assets . therefore to figure out the total amount of money they can deduct one must added the the amortized assets worth together .
The required values from the context for the question are:
customer-related intangible assets: $45826
acquired technology: $45826
trade name: $45826
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 27954 to 42721 which gives add(27954, 42721)
step 2: add 2901 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(2901, add(27954, 42721)),
The final logic expression is add(2901, add(27954, 42721)).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: how many class a common stocks issued and outstanding were issued between 2016 and 2017 in thousands?
Context: ( in thousands ) the class a common stock issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2017 is 339235 ; the class a common stock issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2016 is 338240 ;
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between those two years in class a common stocks issued and outstanding
The required values from the context for the question are:
class a common stock (2017): 339235 (in thousands)
class a common stock (2016): 338240 (in thousands)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 338240 from 339235 which gives subtract(339235, 338240),
The final logic expression is subtract(339235, 338240).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?
Context: the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 400.6 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; the operating income of 2011 is 62.8 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of sales divided by the operating income .
The required values from the context for the question are:
sales (2012): $420.1
operating income (2012): 44.6
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 420.1 by 44.6 which gives divide(420.1, 44.6),
The final logic expression is divide(420.1, 44.6).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average segment revenue , in millions?
Context: years ended december 31 , the segment revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ; the segment revenue of 2008 is $ 6197 ; the segment revenue of 2007 is $ 5918 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all revenue divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
segment revenue (2009): $6305
segment revenue (2008): $6197
segment revenue (2007): $5918
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(segment revenue, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: based on the information provided what is the ratio of the post retirement benefit obligation to the service and interest one-point percentage increase
Context: the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-pointincrease is $ 72238 ; the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-pointdecrease is $ -60261 ( 60261 ) ; the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointincrease is $ 7367 ; the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointdecrease is $ -5974 ( 5974 ) ;
### Output:
Logic: for every dollar of service and interest costs this leads to 9.81 dollars of post retirement benefits as part of the one-percentage point increase
The required values from the context for the question are:
postretirement benefit obligation (increase): $72238
service and interest cost (increase): $7367
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 72238 by 7367 which gives divide(72238, 7367),
The final logic expression is divide(72238, 7367).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the average annual creation of new stores for aap from 2008 to 2012?
Context: the new stores ( 1 ) of 2012 is 116 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2011 is 95 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2010 is 110 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2009 is 75 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2008 is 109 ; the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: . ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores .
### Output:
Logic: to find the average number of stores created one must add up all the stores created between the years of 2008 to 2012 . then one would divide the answer by the number of years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
new stores (2012): 116
new stores (2011): 95
new stores (2010): 110
new stores (2009): 75
new stores (2008): 109
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 116 to 109 which gives add(116, 109)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(116, 109), const_2),
The final logic expression is divide(add(116, 109), const_2).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the variation observed in the operating profit , in millions?
Context: in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 433 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 17 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 112 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
operating profit (2009): 433 (in millions)
operating profit (2008): 17 (in millions)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 17 from 433 which gives subtract(433, 17),
The final logic expression is subtract(433, 17).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the average value for sales?
Context: in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 3060 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 3195 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 3015 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
sales (2009): $3060 (in millions)
sales (2008): $3195 (in millions)
sales (2007): $3015 (in millions)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final logic expression is table_average(sales, none).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the lowest return for the first month of the investment?
Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2014 is $ 350.82 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2014 is 175.99 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.27 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 110.41 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.46 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2014 is 178.05 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
delphi automotive plc (Dec 31, 2011): $100.98
s&p 500 (Dec 31, 2011): 100.80
automotive supplier peer group (Dec 31, 2011): 89.27
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract const_100 from 89.27 which gives subtract(89.27, const_100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(89.27, const_100), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(89.27, const_100), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: if the company were to purchase the remaining shares at the price at december 31 , 2015 , how much would the company have to pay for the remaining shares .
Context: plan category the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b ) is 1442912 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights is $ 86.98 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4446967 ; principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
### Output:
Logic: this can be found by multiplying the amount of remaining shares by the share price .
The required values from the context for the question are:
outstanding options warrants and rights: 1442912
weighted-average price of options warrants and rights: $86.98
remaining available for future issuance: 4446967
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 86.98 by 4446967 which gives multiply(86.98, 4446967),
The final logic expression is multiply(86.98, 4446967).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the variation observed between the tangible and intangible assets , in millions?
Context: the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
intangible assets: $8.5 (in millions)
tangible assets: $14.0 (in millions)
assumed liabilities: $10.9 (in millions)
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 8.5 from 14.0 which gives subtract(14.0, 8.5),
The final logic expression is subtract(14.0, 8.5).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the percentage of tax and accounting fees among the total acquisition-related costs?
Context: acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of tax and accounting fees divided by the total acquisition-related costs , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Acquisition-related costs: $2.8 million
Tax and accounting fees: $1.6 million
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1.6 by 2.8 which gives divide(1.6, 2.8)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.6, 2.8), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.6, 2.8), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what is the difference between the highest and lowest return for the first year of the investment?
Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2014 is $ 350.82 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2014 is 175.99 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.27 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 110.41 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.46 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2014 is 178.05 ;
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between the maximum and minimum value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Delphi Automotive plc (November 17, 2011): $100.00
Delphi Automotive plc (December 31, 2011): $100.98
Delphi Automotive plc (December 31, 2012): $179.33
S&P 500 (November 17, 2011): 100.00
S&P 500 (December 31, 2011): 100.80
S&P 500 (December 31, 2012): 116.93
Automotive Supplier Peer Group (November 17, 2011): 100.00
Automotive Supplier Peer Group (December 31, 2011): 89.27
Automotive Supplier Peer Group (December 31, 2012): 110.41
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 110.41 from 179.33 which gives subtract(179.33, 110.41)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(179.33, 110.41), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(179.33, 110.41), 100).
### End |
### Instruction:
Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Question: what was the percentage increase of total deferred compensation plan investments from 2010 to 2011?\\n
Context: the total deferred compensation plan investments of 2011 is $ 26410 ; the total deferred compensation plan investments of 2010 is $ 8690 ; the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: .
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage increase one must subtract the two totals and then divide the answer by the total for 2010 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total deferred compensation plan investments (2011): $26,410
Total deferred compensation plan investments (2010): $8,690
Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 8690 from 26410 which gives subtract(26410, 8690)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 8690 which gives divide(subtract(26410, 8690), 8690)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(26410, 8690), 8690), 100),
The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(26410, 8690), 8690), 100).
### End |