Data Agents

Enterprise
community
Activity Feed

AI & ML interests

None defined yet.

Recent Activity

data-agents's activity

m-ricย 
posted an update about 10 hours ago
view post
Post
299
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜: you can now share agents to the Hub! ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿฅณ

And any agent pushed to Hub get a cool Space interface to directly chat with it.

This was a real technical challenge: for instance, serializing tools to export them meant that you needed to get all the source code for a tool, verify that it was standalone (not relying on external variables), and gathering all the packages required to make it run.

Go try it out! ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents
  • 1 reply
ยท
m-ricย 
posted an update about 12 hours ago
view post
Post
414
For those who haven't come across it yet, here's a handy trick to discuss an entire GitHub repo with an LLM:

=> Just replace "github" with "gitingest" in the url, and you get the whole repo as a single string that you can then paste in your LLMs
m-ricย 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
4267
"๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฑ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€": this statement has often been made, here are numbers to support it.

I've plotted the progress of AI agents on GAIA test set, and it seems they're headed to catch up with the human baseline in early 2026.

And that progress is still driven mostly by the improvement of base LLMs: progress would be even faster with fine-tuned agentic models.
lewtunย 
posted an update 4 days ago
view post
Post
4163
Introducing OpenR1-Math-220k!

open-r1/OpenR1-Math-220k

The community has been busy distilling DeepSeek-R1 from inference providers, but we decided to have a go at doing it ourselves from scratch ๐Ÿ’ช

Whatโ€™s new compared to existing reasoning datasets?

โ™พ Based on AI-MO/NuminaMath-1.5: we focus on math reasoning traces and generate answers for problems in NuminaMath 1.5, an improved version of the popular NuminaMath-CoT dataset.

๐Ÿณ 800k R1 reasoning traces: We generate two answers for 400k problems using DeepSeek R1. The filtered dataset contains 220k problems with correct reasoning traces.

๐Ÿ“€ 512 H100s running locally: Instead of relying on an API, we leverage vLLM and SGLang to run generations locally on our science cluster, generating 180k reasoning traces per day.

โณ Automated filtering: We apply Math Verify to only retain problems with at least one correct answer. We also leverage Llama3.3-70B-Instruct as a judge to retrieve more correct examples (e.g for cases with malformed answers that canโ€™t be verified with a rules-based parser)

๐Ÿ“Š We match the performance of DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-7B by finetuning Qwen-7B-Math-Instruct on our dataset.

๐Ÿ”Ž Read our blog post for all the nitty gritty details: https://huggingface.co./blog/open-r1/update-2
m-ricย 
posted an update 8 days ago
view post
Post
3515
๐—”๐—ฑ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ป'๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ-๐—ฅ๐Ÿญ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐˜€! โŒ

โžก๏ธ How well do reasoning models perform on agentic tasks? Until now, all indicators seemed to show that they worked really well. On our recent reproduction of Deep Search, OpenAI's o1 was by far the best model to power an agentic system.

So when our partner Adyen built a huge benchmark of 450 data science tasks, and built data agents with smolagents to test different models, I expected reasoning models like o1 or DeepSeek-R1 to destroy the tasks at hand.

๐Ÿ‘Ž But they really missed the mark. DeepSeek-R1 only got 1 or 2 out of 10 questions correct. Similarly, o1 was only at ~13% correct answers.

๐Ÿง These results really surprised us. We thoroughly checked them, we even thought our APIs for DeepSeek were broken and colleagues Leandro Anton helped me start custom instances of R1 on our own H100s to make sure it worked well.
But there seemed to be no mistake. Reasoning LLMs actually did not seem that smart. Often, these models made basic mistakes, like forgetting the content of a folder that they had just explored, misspelling file names, or hallucinating data. Even though they do great at exploring webpages through several steps, the same level of multi-step planning seemed much harder to achieve when reasoning over files and data.

It seems like there's still lots of work to do in the Agents x Data space. Congrats to Adyen for this great benchmark, looking forward to see people proposing better agents! ๐Ÿš€

Read more in the blog post ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://huggingface.co./blog/dabstep
m-ricย 
posted an update 10 days ago
view post
Post
9359
Introducing ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ-๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต by Hugging Face! ๐Ÿ’ฅ

OpenAI's latest agentic app Deep Research seems really good... But it's closed, as usual.

โฑ๏ธ So with a team of cracked colleagues, we set ourselves a 24hours deadline to replicate and open-source Deep Research! โฑ๏ธ

โžก๏ธ We built open-Deep-Research, an entirely open agent that can: navigate the web autonomously, scroll and search through pages, download and manipulate files, run calculation on data...

We aimed for the best performance: are the agent's answers really rigorous?

On GAIA benchmark, Deep Research had 67% accuracy on the validation set.
โžก๏ธ open Deep Research is at 55% (powered by o1), it is:
- the best pass@1 solution submitted
- the best open solution ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ’ช

And it's only getting started ! Please jump in, drop PRs, and let's bring it to the top !

Read the blog post ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://huggingface.co./blog/open-deep-research
m-ricย 
posted an update 14 days ago
view post
Post
3013
Now you can launch a code agent directly from your terminal!
โœจ ๐šœ๐š–๐š˜๐š•๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐š—๐š "๐šˆ๐š˜๐šž๐š› ๐š๐šŠ๐šœ๐š”" directly launches a CodeAgent
โ–ถ๏ธ This also works with web agents (replace ๐šœ๐š–๐š˜๐š•๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐š—๐š with ๐š ๐šŽ๐š‹๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐š—๐š) thanks to @merve !

๐Ÿ’พ Another treat from smolagents release 1.7.0:
Now agents have a memory mechanism, enabling many possibilities like replaying the last run with ๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐š—๐š.๐š›๐šŽ๐š™๐š•๐šŠ๐šข(), thank you @clefourrier !

Check the release notes here ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents/releases/tag/v1.7.0
m-ricย 
posted an update 17 days ago
view post
Post
3985
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฏ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€!

โœ… Hosting our own inference was not enough: now the Hub 4 new inference providers: fal, Replicate, SambaNova Systems, & Together AI.

Check model cards on the Hub: you can now, in 1 click, use inference from various providers (cf video demo)

Their inference can also be used through our Inference API client. There, you can use either your custom provider key, or your HF token, then billing will be handled directly on your HF account, as a way to centralize all expenses.

๐Ÿ’ธ Also, PRO users get 2$ inference credits per month!

Read more in the announcement ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://huggingface.co./blog/inference-providers
  • 1 reply
ยท
lewtunย 
posted an update 21 days ago
view post
Post
10078
We are reproducing the full DeepSeek R1 data and training pipeline so everybody can use their recipe. Instead of doing it in secret we can do it together in the open!

๐Ÿงช Step 1: replicate the R1-Distill models by distilling a high-quality reasoning corpus from DeepSeek-R1.

๐Ÿง  Step 2: replicate the pure RL pipeline that DeepSeek used to create R1-Zero. This will involve curating new, large-scale datasets for math, reasoning, and code.

๐Ÿ”ฅ Step 3: show we can go from base model -> SFT -> RL via multi-stage training.

Follow along: https://github.com/huggingface/open-r1
ยท
m-ricย 
posted an update 21 days ago
view post
Post
3193
Today we make the biggest release in smolagents so far: ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฏ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€! ๐Ÿฅณ

Our agents can now casually open up a web browser, and navigate on it by scrolling, clicking elements on the webpage, going back, just like a user would.

The demo below shows Claude-3.5-Sonnet browsing GitHub for task: "Find how many commits the author of the current top trending repo did over last year."
Hi @mlabonne !

Go try it out, it's the most cracked agentic stuff I've seen in a while ๐Ÿคฏ (well, along with OpenAI's Operator who beat us by one day)

For more detail, read our announcement blog ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://huggingface.co./blog/smolagents-can-see
The code for the web browser example is here ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://github.com/huggingface/smolagents/blob/main/examples/vlm_web_browser.py
ยท
m-ricย 
posted an update 30 days ago
view post
Post
1355
๐— ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜…'๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—  ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ-๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐Ÿฐ๐—  ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜๐—ต ๐Ÿ’ฅ

This work from Chinese startup @MiniMax-AI introduces a novel architecture that achieves state-of-the-art performance while handling context windows up to 4 million tokens - roughly 20x longer than current models. The key was combining lightning attention, mixture of experts (MoE), and a careful hybrid approach.

๐—ž๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐˜€:

๐Ÿ—๏ธ MoE with novel hybrid attention:
โ€ฃ Mixture of Experts with 456B total parameters (45.9B activated per token)
โ€ฃ Combines Lightning attention (linear complexity) for most layers and traditional softmax attention every 8 layers

๐Ÿ† Outperforms leading models across benchmarks while offering vastly longer context:
โ€ฃ Competitive with GPT-4/Claude-3.5-Sonnet on most tasks
โ€ฃ Can efficiently handle 4M token contexts (vs 256K for most other LLMs)

๐Ÿ”ฌ Technical innovations enable efficient scaling:
โ€ฃ Novel expert parallel and tensor parallel strategies cut communication overhead in half
โ€ฃ Improved linear attention sequence parallelism, multi-level padding and other optimizations achieve 75% GPU utilization (that's really high, generally utilization is around 50%)

๐ŸŽฏ Thorough training strategy:
โ€ฃ Careful data curation and quality control by using a smaller preliminary version of their LLM as a judge!

Overall, not only is the model impressive, but the technical paper is also really interesting! ๐Ÿ“
It has lots of insights including a great comparison showing how a 2B MoE (24B total) far outperforms a 7B model for the same amount of FLOPs.

Read it in full here ๐Ÿ‘‰ MiniMax-01: Scaling Foundation Models with Lightning Attention (2501.08313)
Model here, allows commercial use <100M monthly users ๐Ÿ‘‰ MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-Text-01