url
stringlengths
79
94
original_message
stringlengths
5
2.73k
message
stringlengths
0
2.61k
original_label
stringclasses
4 values
is_good
bool
2 classes
is_bad
bool
2 classes
binary_label
float64
0
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/4b549360e08dac944ee34b7c7bf1a95b41f72f35
FailureList isn't public
FailureList isn't public
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/b1d37670892cd885b87a7c62d7c5808517fd20b6
Remove useless variable (#1342)
Remove useless variable
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/870289f3272917f312de6902b8b6bdc43552d4b7
Simplify Filter implementation for backward compatibility
Simplify Filter implementation for backward compatibility
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/50e3d1bc87b4b16f0617b6212252363f499397ab
Added parameter to annotation to mark exceptions in datapoint methods as ignorable.
Added parameter to annotation to mark exceptions in datapoint methods as ignorable.
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/bfa4cea92005b0272e44cd245308dc4f4abaa4cf
drafts for tests for issue #380
drafts for tests for issue #380
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/2f9b53dbecad010dbb7e7cfff3a11476b7d2208a
Simplify Filter implementations
Simplify Filter implementations
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/223b34b516467bcd9cb7ebc7f49549f2e7362dca
Getting started on Interceptors javadoc
Getting started on Interceptors javadoc
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/31c422f63b1b6b930ad4df7a2372a2576cc12094
Rewrite JavaDoc of ExcludeCategories.createFilter(Class<?>...). Remove internal details of the created filter and describe its behaviour instead.
Rewrite JavaDoc of ExcludeCategories.createFilter(Class<?>...). Remove internal details of the created filter and describe its behaviour instead.
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/3cd86b7018f2c57f10d671d007d08caa74463c09
Unnecessary array in varargs in AnnotatedBuildrer: Constructor#newInstance(Object ... initargs)
Unnecessary array in varargs in AnnotatedBuildrer: Constructor#newInstance(Object ... initargs)
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/48af7e797dbefa1fc47e80394c7f74ef87c3c7ab
adding annotation validators functionality
adding annotation validators functionality
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/34a0ecb4ffb3cb8d33b60c222c29145d017f02c9
Added release notes
Added release notes
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/832bb8322f2ca09af52769a0198b276269b53988
Clarify that annotating suite has no effect
Clarify that annotating suite has no effect
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/58723f03198f62f079cd242f7110a94713a5a90b
Move emptySuite method to Suite Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Move emptySuite method to Suite Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/e9d4de8e15255b03b60e935390e517d4de90a73b
Single-datapoint methods are now only called if the return types could be relevant, and theory parameter signatures are compared with types via a prebuilt map rather than reflection.
Single-datapoint methods are now only called if the return types could be relevant, and theory parameter signatures are compared with types via a prebuilt map rather than reflection.
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/cfaceb6d34390d999ff238d53fcb73898b32f98f
Changes due to code review from @dsaff.
Changes due to code review from @dsaff.
Neither Why nor What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/02371d1154f29f894cd2c7f83ce6743f4abbe76a
Added two simple tests for boolean assertArrayEquals
Added two simple tests for boolean assertArrayEquals
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/3171c4b29cb207e71fc2f752f0fbcb235bc8e784
Relicense JUnit from CPL to EPL EPL is the successor version of the CPL this makes re-licensing possible without seeking the approval of all contributors. CPL is actively hurting JUnit adaptation, it the following cases the deciding factor against JUnit was CPL. In both cases EPL would have been fine. * Netbeans can't ship JUnit [4] * OpenJDK uses TestNG instead of JUnit [5] Mike Milinkovich from the Eclipse Foundation wrote [1] > Back in 2009, the CPL was superseded by the EPL. This means that the > EPL is the successor version of the CPL. It also means that using the > CPL is the licensing equivalent of using deprecated code. > > Because the EPL is the successor version to the CPL, the 'new version > re-licensing' clause in Section 7 of the CPL applies. In other words, > you can re-license your project without seeking the approval of all > of your contributors. > The CPL and EPL basically differ by about one sentence, which you can > see here. The difference relates to the scope of patent licenses > terminated should someone sue another party for patent infringement. > This is the kind of stuff that lawyers love, but most developers > don't really care about. On the migration from CPL to EPL Mike Milinkovich wrote [2] > There was a two step process that was followed to make this happen. > First, following the terms of the CPL, IBM assigned the > responsibility to serve as the Agreement Steward of the CPL to the > Eclipse Foundation. Second, the Eclipse Foundation officially > recognized the EPL 1.0 as the new version of the CPL 1.0. In OSI > license terminology, the EPL now supersedes the CPL. > > A quick read of the two licenses will quickly show that they are very > very close. Other than their names and (previously) their Agreement > Stewards, the only substantive difference is the breadth of the > patent license termination in the event of a patent law suit. (See > the second paragraph of Section 7.) For more information on the > relationship between the CPL and the EPL see the EPL FAQ. You can find more information about the difference at [3]. The new `LICENSE.txt` is based on a plain text version of the EPL with formatted so that the diff is a clean as possible. I'll submit another pull request for the gh-pages branch. [1] http://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/jruby-moves-to-the-epl/ [2] http://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/one-small-step-towards-reducing-license-proliferation/ [3] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#EPLDIFFER [4] https://netbeans.org/community/releases/70/relnotes.html#deprecated [5] http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/build.html
Relicense JUnit from CPL to EPL EPL is the successor version of the CPL this makes re-licensing possible without seeking the approval of all contributors. CPL is actively hurting JUnit adaptation, it the following cases the deciding factor against JUnit was CPL. In both cases EPL would have been fine. * Netbeans can't ship JUnit [4] * OpenJDK uses TestNG instead of JUnit [5] Mike Milinkovich from the Eclipse Foundation wrote [1] > Back in 2009, the CPL was superseded by the EPL. This means that the > EPL is the successor version of the CPL. It also means that using the > CPL is the licensing equivalent of using deprecated code. > > Because the EPL is the successor version to the CPL, the 'new version > re-licensing' clause in Section 7 of the CPL applies. In other words, > you can re-license your project without seeking the approval of all > of your contributors. > The CPL and EPL basically differ by about one sentence, which you can > see here. The difference relates to the scope of patent licenses > terminated should someone sue another party for patent infringement. > This is the kind of stuff that lawyers love, but most developers > don't really care about. On the migration from CPL to EPL Mike Milinkovich wrote [2] > There was a two step process that was followed to make this happen. > First, following the terms of the CPL, IBM assigned the > responsibility to serve as the Agreement Steward of the CPL to the > Eclipse Foundation. Second, the Eclipse Foundation officially > recognized the EPL 1.0 as the new version of the CPL 1.0. In OSI > license terminology, the EPL now supersedes the CPL. > > A quick read of the two licenses will quickly show that they are very > very close. Other than their names and (previously) their Agreement > Stewards, the only substantive difference is the breadth of the > patent license termination in the event of a patent law suit. (See > the second paragraph of Section 7.) For more information on the > relationship between the CPL and the EPL see the EPL FAQ. You can find more information about the difference at [3]. The new `LICENSE.txt` is based on a plain text version of the EPL with formatted so that the diff is a clean as possible. I'll submit another pull request for the gh-pages branch. [1] http://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/jruby-moves-to-the-epl/ [2] http://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/one-small-step-towards-reducing-license-proliferation/ [3] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#EPLDIFFER [4] https://netbeans.org/community/releases/70/relnotes.html#deprecated [5] http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/build.html
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/2e9a239f419fa60779b5f1ab191561108e1fe3d4
ExpectedException allows multiple exceptions Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
ExpectedException allows multiple exceptions Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/50b77b1f3108aa77af0906162d552e513936c322
Advance version, and beef up ErrorCollector with checkThat and checkPasses
Advance version, and beef up ErrorCollector with checkThat and checkPasses
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/09ab7decf0c8d3ce8ed8c165465f68e7ebe7af51
Wrong href link for Java API in JUnit Javadoc
Wrong href link for Java API in JUnit Javadoc
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/826529633261161edd2d9dc0f866b2c3c0420514
Changes in response to code review from @kcooney.
Changes in response to code review from @kcooney.
Neither Why nor What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/a688f6cecfe303b02087747226e5c376aebb0c44
Issue #1127; when arrays differ in length, say so, but go ahead and find the first difference as usual to ease diagnosis
Issue #1127; when arrays differ in length, say so, but go ahead and find the first difference as usual to ease diagnosis
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/c9e0f1a3a519bdab2d71b48635a9cc7df3cff3fa
JUnitMatchers.matches creates any type Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
JUnitMatchers.matches creates any type Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/d5af0e46c1cd912ef0932ce868517b1e8335531e
ExpectedException drastically simplified
ExpectedException drastically simplified
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/392c673b5f35c2c72f74a15b24afff338ba4e3a7
Updated URL to Google's code style repository. Document indent size. Updating code style as per https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/pull/1306#issuecomment-221194760
Updated URL to Google's code style repository. Document indent size. Updating code style as per https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/pull/1306#issuecomment-221194760
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/9164fdee10603ebdb2b4a7d78ab00046fa3ad37f
Hamcrest 1.2 documented in release notes
Hamcrest 1.2 documented in release notes
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/34336085d5aba69c997f8e6b244531561afebcd4
Modification in response to code review from @kcooney and @dsaff.
Modification in response to code review from @kcooney and @dsaff.
Neither Why nor What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/26fa0a4207e21f058d220c84f8195ee25943400c
ExpectedException Interceptor added
ExpectedException Interceptor added
Neither Why nor What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/e6769d4009db8030661815965e2e22829a4619ff
No Interceptors class, interceptors turned on by default
No Interceptors class, interceptors turned on by default
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/610b38e6c9753ab01b8aef093d2fcaeabe3a7a32
Updated release notes Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Updated release notes Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/38f920506399298a945ed38e08e18e1dafb62520
Remove throws from TestWatchman.starting
Remove throws from TestWatchman.starting
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/356a069f8cbbad2a368fdbc6ceee4e94200e7140
Getting there with FrameworkField, but checking in before everything works, to demo squeezing Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Getting there with FrameworkField, but checking in before everything works, to demo squeezing Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/7b94e3de5c8eab7e25c8b3be0e822ae6d4175bf0
don't wrap statements for before/after/etc unless there's something to wrap them with. Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
don't wrap statements for before/after/etc unless there's something to wrap them with. Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No What
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/507e7b1799801409104fa5054b3bc6ac3fe82e7d
Added TestName Interceptor
Added TestName Interceptor
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/ff2ff9176dfb18887a8e6e463e49b00c6f3acc5f
Another TODO bites the dust
Another TODO bites the dust
No What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/3bcf273c37bc31e1f13986b02977cadbcd2b5a76
Removing more TODOs Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Removing more TODOs Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/4d6f0702dae590809b808230f027a60aa0a4a345
Added parallel tests to AllTests
Added parallel tests to AllTests
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/13bda470bfa1fe989ce80d616fb096af1b937146
Make ParallelComputer more beautiful by creating a Decorator extension point in ParentRunner Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Make ParallelComputer more beautiful by creating a Decorator extension point in ParentRunner Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Why and What
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/9f1840115193b7d1bc4bc0b2715d762d317689dd
Ignore test for gump (need better long-term solution)
Ignore test for gump (need better long-term solution)
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/fdc9cd5ea91f5ae1d7e5991abadd1b3f989626f7
Incorporated James Abbley's patch for ParallelComputer Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Incorporated James Abbley's patch for ParallelComputer Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/44e2ed65cd904fc03aecd3b0763856009294bdec
Finishing the work of ComparisonCriteria Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Finishing the work of ComparisonCriteria Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/3e7f1f74fff77f46d292e6b7828c020d67b148ae
Added note of fixed bug
Added note of fixed bug
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/503a3b0d79d395ae5c05fee40cd4de2b927b7808
We're 4.7 now Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
We're 4.7 now Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/f9168cb066a53dc63f7346f6bb3d25a46d0ccbed
Fix javadoc on Parameterized
Fix javadoc on Parameterized
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/469dcc78a7610916ffa29e2cefc21f80430df8c0
Updated to 4.6 final Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Updated to 4.6 final Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/70986438ca98df55899e293a72931fc12bb737d9
Last changes with Kent. Added fixed bugs to Release notes. Updated version number. Updated README.html Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Last changes with Kent. Added fixed bugs to Release notes. Updated version number. Updated README.html Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/f3c211455b9e09be36e4bf7ccc499fbdd35a527a
Finished release notes, I think
Finished release notes, I think
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/28fb91ac246e4d8a557358ec9f89d9cb80473100
Added Mark Shapiro to acknowledgements Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
Added Mark Shapiro to acknowledgements Signed-off-by: Kent Beck <[email protected]>
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/d9c81356e3a2fbb165c71b32d63d0cc39a1bd861
Preparing for 4.6
Preparing for 4.6
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/85578d48f6459a05665329faa9b52a861e9142cb
Now sorting tests globally
Now sorting tests globally
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/d6662fcc06ec7b07c696eb703c47d3731e4e11c7
Oops, checked in some scaffolding and temporary changes
Oops, checked in some scaffolding and temporary changes
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/df48b66e73c740acb15f065eb7a4bad433930891
AllTests passes, but Eclipse doesn't cal JUnitCore, so first attempt at dogfooding failed.
AllTests passes, but Eclipse doesn't cal JUnitCore, so first attempt at dogfooding failed.
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/143c96470aec3221f76f9dcc8042fb36cc88b852
Update version to 4.6-SNAPSHOT
Update version to 4.6-SNAPSHOT
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/cec4a6baf600b8dee3d1318c242a67b56874288a
*** empty log message ***
*** empty log message ***
Neither Why nor What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/8760e505d64d69534073f28bdf47886d20dbca4e
build.xml should be in junit*.zip
build.xml should be in junit*.zip
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/7e77e49c40afb951ae5a5cbdf75ebb4a478e2bb7
Updated README.html
Updated README.html
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/71ce2b015df78f167e4681b097cadc2e0e6655e2
JUnit4 runner as a pointer to the current default
JUnit4 runner as a pointer to the current default
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/ca6d91f41d566b21b643b013e843732e1315652f
Failing assumptions can be listened for.
Failing assumptions can be listened for.
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/50b9c949876189d8c4871471ec346988e4ccae06
Better validation in Theories
Better validation in Theories
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/5cac7b8bbe41253d3122c434b3887a2be577017e
Switched classpath to Execution Environment J2SE 1.5, in hopes all developers will match that.
Switched classpath to Execution Environment J2SE 1.5, in hopes all developers will match that.
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/eb2750d861ac1ecf2dbd0425e457fe833468a169
Added Johannes Link's test for running subclasses of Suite
Added Johannes Link's test for running subclasses of Suite
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/8c61443793e4c2e90a4056ee528c3880febb53d2
Move deprecated classes back where they used to be.
Move deprecated classes back where they used to be.
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/078e45bd31a9920e00633ad6ce658e22529304f2
Brought in old JUnit4ClassRunner for compatibility. Renamed new JUnit4ClassRunner to BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.
Brought in old JUnit4ClassRunner for compatibility. Renamed new JUnit4ClassRunner to BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/65ff7563cc41bc7158d05e69ea0e1ec7bc0f6bd5
Finishing javadoc for org.junit.runner.*
Finishing javadoc for org.junit.runner.*
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/f691c8f29653e75a8bac5e7bec1861e948966978
Javadocs for three more classes
Javadocs for three more classes
No Why
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/3a7fe9fb7714a890a307ff6d7695e70548ebc457
Added profile task to build.xml
Added profile task to build.xml
No Why
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/ef32d036d0ff96328f622942514ca73b5f69556d
Adding javadoc. Move Enclosed to experimental.
Adding javadoc. Move Enclosed to experimental.
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/98555e6c5b77b59017eeaa6b54f65c1717c16b72
JavaDoc cleanup
JavaDoc cleanup
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/d148bce8682505082a3cc634acbd36ac13a10c9a
A SuiteBuilder can be explicitly passed to a Runner class that needs one in its constructor. This eliminates the ugly global constant SuiteBuilder in Suite, and breaks the cyclic dependency between runners and requests
A SuiteBuilder can be explicitly passed to a Runner class that needs one in its constructor. This eliminates the ugly global constant SuiteBuilder in Suite, and breaks the cyclic dependency between runners and requests
Why and What
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/a916d4133c7e394130d7953da427aae9917ab92c
Invalid assumptions, failed tests, and ignored tests now all print similarly
Invalid assumptions, failed tests, and ignored tests now all print similarly
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/5af049cac0c976c586d955607fa459aacb778d3c
Remove unnecessary comments
Remove unnecessary comments
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/5e4f8e7fb82919d992887fca1741bb04ef1c8f4a
New Suite implementation makes ClassesRequest crazy simple
New Suite implementation makes ClassesRequest crazy simple
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/42beed3ad166a9cceefc59f6c79a16844cae0d02
ParentRunner handles filtering and sorting for all runners, now including CompositeRunner
ParentRunner handles filtering and sorting for all runners, now including CompositeRunner
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/8a8008c96936d468a2f579bcea9a71e965558d57
Ignored tests should be shown differently in stack trace section of report
Ignored tests should be shown differently in stack trace section of report
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/0d6cd750d53486f01f12ddfee8657d94b5940574
Remove old todo
Remove old todo
Why and What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/9a5dfd996ab7007994fcf60752441835dbdbb5d0
Moved InitializationError into proper package
Moved InitializationError into proper package
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/81ef67251efba98fd6bb1065e9ab97c102dbcc24
No matching parameters is now an assumption failure, not an assertion failure
No matching parameters is now an assumption failure, not an assertion failure
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/b52e4af4eb7b26619e1d80537952aed7276766cb
Remove
Remove
Neither Why nor What
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/79eaab79a64788273989403e259ca9584a9a5254
Ignore target directory
Ignore target directory
No Why
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/897fa2227e26f221e5efa4f95a805f7ff1ccac5f
Now includes filtering
Now includes filtering
No Why
false
true
0
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/a6368e40e787e7a23c9f1e58d6a47bf9fa2d0a2c
Pull classBlock up into ParentRunner
Pull classBlock up into ParentRunner
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/73015005c155a0a7efdfe9edef87a95bb6fcc2de
Tweaked Theories a bit. It still seems strange that the class runner creates a statement which creates another class runner (or perhaps more class runners?).
Tweaked Theories a bit. It still seems strange that the class runner creates a statement which creates another class runner (or perhaps more class runners?).
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/4cb9a65f450efa5f2a42128856c7b56e6d283386
Fixed a bug in Theories classes with constructor parameters, where the method parameters and constructor parameters were switched
Fixed a bug in Theories classes with constructor parameters, where the method parameters and constructor parameters were switched
Why and What
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/59b1e2926cdebfd257c6c091ee2bd478d8aa04d2
Theory classes can take constructor parameters
Theory classes can take constructor parameters
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/4d9c88e37dfed614a1bd1ae2ca2ecc86122aa9f1
Removed MethodValidator, replaced with ErrorList, which moved to model package with InitializationError
Removed MethodValidator, replaced with ErrorList, which moved to model package with InitializationError
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/6887479f1b64c5a18f5708ea6905bb59804a9a0f
Simplified Theories. Factored out ignoring violated assumptions into its own Link.
Simplified Theories. Factored out ignoring violated assumptions into its own Link.
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/44e7458b19d5cd1900a765a440c96e85b81d25fc
- Renamed link classes. Absolute actions are verbs: IgnoreTest, Invoke. ActionModifiers are modifying phrases: ExpectingException, WithTimeout, etc. - Moved isShadowedBy(List) to TestMethod
- Renamed link classes. Absolute actions are verbs: IgnoreTest, Invoke. ActionModifiers are modifying phrases: ExpectingException, WithTimeout, etc. - Moved isShadowedBy(List) to TestMethod
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/35f5f3a78cdc49954e9542dafeea86f13705fdf8
Reorganize tests
Reorganize tests
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/7ce9e33e556cf1817d94f769e09c9d22b8d2764d
Leave this method in--it's used by the JMock custom runner, and possibly others
Leave this method in--it's used by the JMock custom runner, and possibly others
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/ee235bc8c5cf5d4345a690f1bd7e3fd1967ef8ea
Re-organize theory packages
Re-organize theory packages
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/87245d66c7a17b27478da3bf7030e1b2dc86da55
Added script for uploading docs
Added script for uploading docs
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/24eacde6262fbb3ce096fe59e8df93907b7622ae
Created a separate build directory for new build scripts, including FTP upload
Created a separate build directory for new build scripts, including FTP upload
No Why
true
false
1
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/398bf2652efda067329f9fdedd13cd8e466c3be4
Comparing arrays declared as Object now uses array comparison. There was also a strange change to the .classpath file that I reverted. -- Kent
Comparing arrays declared as Object now uses array comparison. There was also a strange change to the .classpath file that I reverted. -- Kent
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/53b526ebaa46a5027cf1bc5a820b47badc83a3ed
Methods on inaccessible superclasses of test classes are caught during validation
Methods on inaccessible superclasses of test classes are caught during validation
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/57f06901cde6ec806d4f4381670466ab5fbac300
Updated README about Enclosed
Updated README about Enclosed
Why and What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/0954736a4d4436436e0c12d5700100ac6b8aa1da
run awtui and swingui with -noload
run awtui and swingui with -noload
No Why
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/fb9f199f0ff53dded91ebb483aab7483a6e7e12a
fixed generated argument names
fixed generated argument names
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/ba28bf0f0384ba8b2fc377ef612545f411a56ec4
[ 609972 ] '...' in ComparisonFailure
[ 609972 ] '...' in ComparisonFailure
Neither Why nor What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/ece77fa477a6d322bb5b37c7e2367f4c4dfbf9f3
[ 774304 ] Fix for JUnit 3.8.1 does not compile with JDK 1.1
[ 774304 ] Fix for JUnit 3.8.1 does not compile with JDK 1.1
No What
false
false
null
https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/commit/c3c1b5edd8053bbce99d954d4abc2361ead06fd5
Fixes bug reported on Support Request 615265 swingui progress bar color on Mac OS X
Fixes bug reported on Support Request 615265 swingui progress bar color on Mac OS X
No What
false
false
null