Datasets:

janaab

/

supreme-court-speech

like 1

both are very clearly contextualized

the tenth schedule was used for the purposes of toppling an elected government and supposing tomorrow your lordship's posed by these actions which are uncontroverted that they disqualified themselves

my lord on the other hand

my lord two a

there are petitioners who are merely seeking assertion of some right of their own

that is mr

but then that's what i'm trying to explain the neat liquor is also more often than not mixed with ice cubes

alcoholic liquor for human consumption that is to say

that is only to preserve and protect

it is inchoate

my lord what we can do is by tomorrow

first document dated the twenty seventh of february twenty eighteen

your lordship will just take a look at article three hundred and seventy

a chart actually

before you take over contract act

now one other submission of mr

and i just wanted to point out only two paras paras thirty six and forty seven only to answer your lordship's query why assam why not bengal etc

now if your lordship just goes to section seven for a minute you can have three possible situations

my lords yesterday my lord the chief justice had posed a question to mr

off the track the kyc with regard to anyone who makes donation above r's

so if a tax is mentioned in any other list then parliament can't exercise the residual power of legislation to enact that act

we can be in white

two hundred even today

violation might be claimed by another class who are denied citizenship

impliedly by extending something from the taxing entry in list ii we make the list i entry a taxing entry which is actually a general entry

yes

i'm coming to that

justice shah my lords

follow up all concerns that test

though fifteen four has come subsequently forty six is from inception

it's not that simple

it's not alcohol but it's still referred to as liquor

that's fine

yes

and so long as these two remain on the book you cannot now bring by way of an interpretation that a in three is not a

which is confidentiality according to us

and when nabam rebia is creating a problem you wanted to

but you can complete the documents and then give us

so here the court clearly says it does not touch upon a prosecution though as here founded on a criminal statute of general application does not draw in question the legislative acts of the defendant member of the congress or his motive for performing them

but at the other level it is also part of a federal union as federations are understood

dhavan

other five persons from different countries would come and review our system whether we are following that or not and would grade us

now my lord at this stage i would like to show how this scheme operates to satisfy your lordship's conscience

you have the academically oriented members of the bar the attorney himself mr

pdf pagination my lord getting that

that is the correct position

yes

yes

yes

so the people who are challenging but they must produce enough material to show that it is an impedimental free flow of trade whereas the chief justice thakur said that it can't be a restriction

there's a report in the european parliament on this question

the same caste may be a scheduled caste in a state but maybe a scheduled caste only in a particular district of another state

the important point here is if you prove you established then only you'll administer

now this is fundamentally important for the future and what azeez basha lays down

no but the most crucial fact is that the disqualification petitions are only against sixteen and not not thirty nine

because of the delay interest has risen to by three thousand crores

the longer the time that elapses we will be ourselves a little hazier with

parliament also cannot say that well i have made the law section two is there now rest will be laid down by rules as was earlier done in nineteen forty eight act

yes

aggarwala would you like to mention this

if they had obeyed the whip we'd be in majority he would not have got elected

at page thirty four pdf page thirty four ' a meeting of members of shiv sena legislative party was held under the chairmanship of so and so

and that you would donate five percent initially then it became seven five percent under the twenty thirteen act

can majority of the legislative party decide i'll change the whip tomorrow

my lords at the bottom i have done nothing but repeated what your lordships sutras as mr

there would be certain specific entries in the government of india act with reference to which there was an acceptance

the declaration made by parliament in section two of the nineteen fifty seven act states that it is expedient in the public interest that the union should take under its control the regulation of mines and the development of minerals to the extent provided in the act itself

the mla's are consequently arrested and by the time they are able to procure bail for themselves they miss out on debates or other important bills which were laid before the house during their absence

yes

it is true that this is line of your lordship deciding the issue afresh

my lord may i mention my lord

my lords so therefore there are many checks and balances that article three hundred and sixty eight envisages that is not envisaged in the general legislative powers that are exercised either by state legislatures or by the parliament

i'm appearing for kesar enterprises and state of up is the appellant

and your lordships has seen that royalty is payable even by the government to the private person

yes

and that is a matter of law my lords

in three hundred and fifty five they are bound to protect the federation

now my lord i quite appreciate everything that your lordship has said but it is a very serious issue which arises in the context of thirty one c

now section fifteen one a small g is for minor minerals and the state has power to make rules

we can't do it

the later nineteen ten act used this term compendiously to include all spirits all kinds of spirits while spirit under eighteen eighty act included liquor of all kinds

but ultimately the law which is made limiting is

i got an agreement

when a whip is going to be issued my lords it is issued outside the house and translated inside the house

then on the question of validity of the vote a decision is made within the parliament

now this particular passage says the court has two duties eleven six a is existence thirty three two is stamp and my power under eleven six a does not take away my duty under thirty three two

i am not going to make a proposition that will in fact destroy the fabric of a constitutional structure that has been placed since independence since we are a republic

that's my contention

in parliament my lords

it is nineteen fifty one

so the issue was never that royalty is a tax

sharma

now eight is a new provision rule which now requires that initial leases will be of fifty years rest all by auction

yeah i can do either

evening would be fine

an envelope contained hundred crores

there is no permanence in a constituent assembly

yes that is the crux of my submission

the details shall include the date of the purchase of each electoral bond the name of the purchaser of the bond and the denomination of the electoral bond purchased

twenty six eighty and i just want to read two specific parts of it