Datasets:

janaab

/

supreme-court-speech

like 1

yes

maybe that's in the light of your lordships decision maybe my lord that can be done by the smaller bench

yes

not supposed conflict that's in future order may be issued and then conflict may arise

i won't go into greater detail about it

i will take two minutes of your lordship's time

it's all inclusive

this is done in nineteen fifty one my lord where while the court becomes the supreme body it need not be all muslims

narasimha rao requires to be reconsidered by a larger bench

can the states not say look in my state my state these communities are these are the truly marginalised communities

right

it has no it has never had even one day of history of enmity or war or anything with india

when you have constitutionally committed yourself that if this is to be done you have to follow a process which two sovereign authorities have agreed upon and is grafted in article three hundred seventy

it's on the screen also

so my lords therefore fifty people in the house can actually have a leader in the house without reference to the party if that logic is accepted

about the relevance of malpe

so if you are consuming natural gas from say which comes in from jamnagar different rate altogether

occupy the field

the rapid fire happened in synthetics too as a consequence of which lots of things didn't come there

eighty or ninety percent of the litigants are not able to come to the supreme court

a trust vote which we will have to invalidate

there was hardly any law that was left

three descents and every thirty one member committee which is a mini parliament

they can say limitation means that ensure that the tax or some factor that etr rate or something which they have suggested it should not go beyond this

so if you are talking about not really interpretation of any word or an expression in article one hundred and five

fifteen sixty seven

any corrections can be indicated to our it team

this is the interesting observation despite the denial of article fourteen and on the basis that these articles have indicia which is not there in article thirty one b

last line at page fourteen twenty one 'bars of limitation judicially engrafted are no doubt meant to provide a solution to the aforementioned problems

but then mr

how is it impacting that's the real test we say the proof of putting is in the eating

unlike twenty four

the respondents in defence have sought to intermingle the definition of political party with that of the legislature party and have sought to extrapolate the legislature party in place in the place of a political party into one b

so what persuasions went to will not be inquired into

yes

when the leader of the house my lords or the leader of the opposition that's how the party conveys the

the transparency international looking at importance of public life being on ethical and moral consideration

that's what i said

inference

don't have a trust vote

you have included those three

or at list two sorry

it needs no elaboration that to the extent to which the central government had taken under its control the regulation of mines and minerals development under nineteen fifty seven act the states had lost their legislative competence

these bonds were redeemed by political parties in their designated bank accounts

determine whether or not in fact three hundred and seventy should be abrogated at all or not

it's going to change now with his deletion

that's very important because that shows that though they were essentially tribes they've been classified as caste for the purpose of article three hundred forty one

'first we look to the form of the act to determine whether it is inherently legislative or non legislative

where do we find it in the volumes

i'm glad that my learned friend pointed it out my lords

described by mr

likewise it is a good it can be taxed under entry fifty two that is entry tax earlier

no let us see

there is something else also that comes out from it

you know really speaking why should the bench of nine go into these issues at all

otherwise stays just continue for decades to an end particularly in the larger high courts

yes several of them are missing

yes stamp act

that is one of the objectives

they remember him as a man who lived and died for his words

and forty nine all the cases so on and so forth ' so therefore if my lords will see that this is the implementation that had to be carried out as per the assam accord absence of this implementation cannot be a reason to fault section six a

this is now my lords replaced by legislative assembly

pdf thirty eight ws volume two

but let me take your lordships to the judgment itself

what is that

accordingly the consequence is that invalidation of thirty one c has to follow

but if the two fields if the two taxing events the two taxing objects are different now here is the contradiction in their article

in fact three laws in this case including transfer of property act

k

all right

i agree

before the speaker