id
stringlengths
1
5
question_id
stringlengths
1
5
document_id
stringlengths
5
7
question
stringlengths
55
970
type
stringclasses
1 value
choices
list
context
stringlengths
0
971
answer
sequence
9900
13683
3681405
Compared to surgery-alone arm what was the result of preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery on Progression-free survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The median survival time (MST) was 45.42 months in the preoperative chemotherapy arm and 57.59 months in the surgery-alone arm (log-rank P = 0.016), with a HR of death of 1.67 (95% CI, 1.43–1.96
[ "no significant difference" ]
9901
13684
3685700
Compared to sleep (permitted between 22:30 and 06:30 h)+ six orally presented yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) what was the result of total sleep deprivation (TSD) + six yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) on hunger?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
However, no significant differences between the TSD and sleep conditions were observed when the change in hunger before (i.e., 08:00 h) and after the preload (i.e., 08:30 h) was analyzed (TSD vs. Sleep, −37 ± 6 vs. −36 ± 5 mm).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9902
13685
3685700
Compared to sleep (permitted between 22:30 and 06:30 h)+ six orally presented yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) what was the result of total sleep deprivation (TSD) + six yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) on ratings of sweet intensity or pleasantness of the yogurt samples with varying sucrose concentrations?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
However, no significant differences between the TSD and sleep conditions were observed when the change in hunger before (i.e., 08:00 h) and after the preload (i.e., 08:30 h) was analyzed (TSD vs. Sleep, −37 ± 6 vs. −36 ± 5 mm).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9903
13686
3685700
Compared to sleep (permitted between 22:30 and 06:30 h)+ six orally presented yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) what was the result of total sleep deprivation (TSD) + six yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) on Plasma glucose measurements?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
However, no significant differences between the TSD and sleep conditions were observed when the change in hunger before (i.e., 08:00 h) and after the preload (i.e., 08:30 h) was analyzed (TSD vs. Sleep, −37 ± 6 vs. −36 ± 5 mm).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9904
13687
3685700
Compared to sleep (permitted between 22:30 and 06:30 h)+ six orally presented yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) what was the result of total sleep deprivation (TSD) + six yogurt probes with varying sucrose concentrations (2–29 %) on Plasma concentrations of total ghrelin?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
However, no significant differences between the TSD and sleep conditions were observed when the change in hunger before (i.e., 08:00 h) and after the preload (i.e., 08:30 h) was analyzed (TSD vs. Sleep, −37 ± 6 vs. −36 ± 5 mm).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9905
13688
5737953
Compared to lip balm with aciclovir cream what was the result of lip balm with propolis special extract GH 2002 on The median time to complete encrustation/epithelialization?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The median time to complete encrustation/epithelialization was 4.0 days with propolis (average 4.41 [1.63] days), and 5.0 days with aciclovir (average 5.54 [1.87]). The superiority of propolis was highly significant (P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test modified for superiority testing with a threshold 0.5 days; Figure 4).Figure 4
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9906
13690
5737953
Compared to lip balm with aciclovir cream what was the result of lip balm with propolis special extract GH 2002 on severe tension and swelling?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The median time to complete encrustation/epithelialization was 4.0 days with propolis (average 4.41 [1.63] days), and 5.0 days with aciclovir (average 5.54 [1.87]). The superiority of propolis was highly significant (P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test modified for superiority testing with a threshold 0.5 days; Figure 4).Figure 4
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9907
13691
5737953
Compared to lip balm with aciclovir cream what was the result of lip balm with propolis special extract GH 2002 on itching or burning?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The median time to complete encrustation/epithelialization was 4.0 days with propolis (average 4.41 [1.63] days), and 5.0 days with aciclovir (average 5.54 [1.87]). The superiority of propolis was highly significant (P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test modified for superiority testing with a threshold 0.5 days; Figure 4).Figure 4
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9908
13692
5737953
Compared to lip balm with aciclovir cream what was the result of lip balm with propolis special extract GH 2002 on assessment of global efficacy by the physicians "good" to "very good""?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The median time to complete encrustation/epithelialization was 4.0 days with propolis (average 4.41 [1.63] days), and 5.0 days with aciclovir (average 5.54 [1.87]). The superiority of propolis was highly significant (P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test modified for superiority testing with a threshold 0.5 days; Figure 4).Figure 4
[ "significantly increased" ]
9909
13694
4354432
Compared to warfarin (25 mg) alone what was the result of lobeglitazone (0.5 mg) for 1–12 days with warfarin (25 mg) on findings for vital signs or physical examination results?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No clinically significant findings for vital signs or physical examination results were observed.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9910
13695
3558647
Compared to cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg (C group) what was the result of Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg (R group) on The best time to laryngoscopy?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The best time to laryngoscopy was predicted by measuring TOF and was found to be significantly longer in the C group (197 ± 53 s) than in the R group (102 ± 49 s) (P value < 0.05).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9911
13696
3476989
Compared to abstained from coffee intake what was the result of coffee (1/2 -1 cup) on average 1 h 18 min before start on The pain level in the active side of the shoulder/neck?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The pain increase in the active side of the shoulder/neck was significantly lower for the coffee consumers than for the abstainers (see Table 1; β5),
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9912
13697
3770494
Compared to placebo what was the result of methylphenidate (MPH) 20 mg on recalled the last five words?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was, however, no difference between the real MPH and placebo groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9913
13698
3770494
Compared to placebo what was the result of methylphenidate (MPH) 20 mg on anger and fatigue?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was, however, no difference between the real MPH and placebo groups.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9914
13699
4161875
Compared to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were blinded in the control group what was the result of intervention group these data were used to feed a computerized glucose regulation algorithm on daily nursing workload for glucose control?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
significant reduction in daily nursing workload for glucose control was found in the intervention group (17 versus 36 minutes; P <0.001)
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9915
13700
4161875
Compared to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were blinded in the control group what was the result of intervention group these data were used to feed a computerized glucose regulation algorithm on Mean daily costs per patient?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
significant reduction in daily nursing workload for glucose control was found in the intervention group (17 versus 36 minutes; P <0.001)
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9916
13701
4710815
Compared to HandiHaler 18 µg (HH18) what was the result of Respimat 2.5 µg (R 2.5), Respimat 5 µg(R5) on incidence of cardiac disorders?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Although the incidence of cardiac disorders was higher in the HandiHaler group (n=5 vs 2), the very small number of cardiac deaths, the small absolute risk difference and the wide CIs around the HRs, do not indicate any significant difference (table 2).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9917
13702
4710815
Compared to HandiHaler 18 µg (HH18) what was the result of Respimat 2.5 µg (R 2.5), Respimat 5 µg(R5) on number of cardiac deaths?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Although the incidence of cardiac disorders was higher in the HandiHaler group (n=5 vs 2), the very small number of cardiac deaths, the small absolute risk difference and the wide CIs around the HRs, do not indicate any significant difference (table 2).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9918
13703
4710815
Compared to HandiHaler 18 µg (HH18) what was the result of Respimat 2.5 µg (R 2.5), Respimat 5 µg(R5) on cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac history defined as history of MI, ischaemic heart disease/coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmia or heart failure?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Although the incidence of cardiac disorders was higher in the HandiHaler group (n=5 vs 2), the very small number of cardiac deaths, the small absolute risk difference and the wide CIs around the HRs, do not indicate any significant difference (table 2).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9919
13704
4710815
Compared to HandiHaler 18 µg (HH18) what was the result of Respimat 2.5 µg (R 2.5), Respimat 5 µg(R5) on safety,The risk of exacerbation and major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACEs)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Although the incidence of cardiac disorders was higher in the HandiHaler group (n=5 vs 2), the very small number of cardiac deaths, the small absolute risk difference and the wide CIs around the HRs, do not indicate any significant difference (table 2).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9920
13705
3747889
Compared to standard glycemic care and double-blind therapy with a 1-g capsule of n-3FA; what was the result of insulin glargine and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3FA) supplements on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Compared with standard care, insulin glargine reduced the primary CIMT outcome, but the difference was not statistically significant (difference = 0.0030 ± 0.0021 mm/year; P = 0.145)
[ "no significant difference" ]
9921
13706
3747889
Compared to standard glycemic care and double-blind therapy with a 1-g capsule of n-3FA; what was the result of insulin glargine and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3FA) supplements on change in maximum CIMT for the common carotid and the common carotid plus bifurcation?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Compared with standard care, insulin glargine reduced the primary CIMT outcome, but the difference was not statistically significant (difference = 0.0030 ± 0.0021 mm/year; P = 0.145)
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9922
13707
3747889
Compared to placebo what was the result of insulin glargine and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3FA) supplements on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), change in maximum CIMT for the common carotid and the common carotid plus bifurcation?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Compared with standard care, insulin glargine reduced the primary CIMT outcome, but the difference was not statistically significant (difference = 0.0030 ± 0.0021 mm/year; P = 0.145)
[ "no significant difference" ]
9923
13711
5725027
Compared to control group S received sufentanil 0.04 ug/(kg·h) what was the result of group D received dexmedetomidine 0.04 ug/(kg·h) plus sufentanil 0.02 ug/(kg·h) on quality of recovery (QoR)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the group D than in the group S on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3 and 5 (P < 0.05).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9924
13712
5725027
Compared to control group S received sufentanil 0.04 ug/(kg·h) what was the result of group D received dexmedetomidine 0.04 ug/(kg·h) plus sufentanil 0.02 ug/(kg·h) on The pressing times of analgesic pump and rescue tramadol?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the group D than in the group S on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3 and 5 (P < 0.05).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9925
13713
5725027
Compared to control group S received sufentanil 0.04 ug/(kg·h) what was the result of group D received dexmedetomidine 0.04 ug/(kg·h) plus sufentanil 0.02 ug/(kg·h) on incidence of nausea?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the group D than in the group S on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3 and 5 (P < 0.05).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9926
13714
5725027
Compared to control group S received sufentanil 0.04 ug/(kg·h) what was the result of group D received dexmedetomidine 0.04 ug/(kg·h) plus sufentanil 0.02 ug/(kg·h) on Vomiting?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the group D than in the group S on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3 and 5 (P < 0.05).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9927
13715
2365983
Compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and open restorative proctocolectomy what was the result of total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy on Median operating time?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Morbidity and reoperation rates in the total laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open groups were comparable (29 vs. 20 vs. 23 percent and 17 vs.10 vs. 13 percent, respectively).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9928
13716
2365983
Compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy, and open restorative proctocolectomy what was the result of total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy on Morbidity and reoperation rates?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Morbidity and reoperation rates in the total laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open groups were comparable (29 vs. 20 vs. 23 percent and 17 vs.10 vs. 13 percent, respectively).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9929
13717
2365983
Compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and open restorative proctocolectomy what was the result of total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy on daily and total morphine requirement?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Morbidity and reoperation rates in the total laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open groups were comparable (29 vs. 20 vs. 23 percent and 17 vs.10 vs. 13 percent, respectively).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9930
13718
2365983
Compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy what was the result of total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy on costs?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Morbidity and reoperation rates in the total laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open groups were comparable (29 vs. 20 vs. 23 percent and 17 vs.10 vs. 13 percent, respectively).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9931
13719
5807510
Compared to standard genetic tests alone what was the result of rWGS plus standard genetic tests on the rate of genetic diagnosis within 28 days?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Nevertheless, intention to treat analysis showed the rate of genetic diagnosis within 28 days of enrollment (the primary end-point) to be higher in cases (31%, 10 of 32) than controls (3%, 1 of 33; difference, 28% [95% CI, 10–46%]; p = 0.003).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9932
13720
5807510
Compared to standard genetic tests alone what was the result of rWGS plus standard genetic tests on the rate of neonatal diagnosis?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Nevertheless, intention to treat analysis showed the rate of genetic diagnosis within 28 days of enrollment (the primary end-point) to be higher in cases (31%, 10 of 32) than controls (3%, 1 of 33; difference, 28% [95% CI, 10–46%]; p = 0.003).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9933
13721
5807510
Compared to standard genetic tests alone what was the result of rWGS plus standard genetic tests on Median age at diagnosis and median time to diagnosis?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Nevertheless, intention to treat analysis showed the rate of genetic diagnosis within 28 days of enrollment (the primary end-point) to be higher in cases (31%, 10 of 32) than controls (3%, 1 of 33; difference, 28% [95% CI, 10–46%]; p = 0.003).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9934
13722
4364332
Compared to standard trial invitation letter what was the result of trial invitation letter containing an incentive offer of £100 on positive response to the first invitation letter?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The £100 incentive offer increased positive response to the first invitation letter from 24.7% to 31.6%, an increase of 6.9% (P < 0.05).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9935
13723
5842245
Compared to The iMBI (In Swedish: Mindfulness Grundkurs 2.0 from Mindfulnesscenter AB, Sweden) what was the result of Music therapy intervention (iMT) on GSI from Symptoms Checklist-90 or PSS Perceived Stress Scale-14 or PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Table 1 shows the comparisons between those who logged in and completed at least one session and those who did not log into the self-help programmes. No significant difference in any of the scales was found between those who logged in and completed at least one session and those who did not log into the self-help programmes.Table 1
[ "no significant difference" ]
9936
13724
5863299
Compared to placebo what was the result of Danhong injection combined with Naoxintong capsule for 12 weeks on Circulating nitric oxide levels?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At 12 weeks of treatment the level of NO had significantly elevated in both groups, but the change in the treatment group was obviously larger than that in the control group (P < 0.05)
[ "significantly increased" ]
9937
13725
5863299
Compared to placebo what was the result of Danhong injection combined with Naoxintong capsule for 12 weeks on Circulating levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and von Willebrand factor (VWF)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At 12 weeks of treatment the level of NO had significantly elevated in both groups, but the change in the treatment group was obviously larger than that in the control group (P < 0.05)
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9938
13726
5863299
Compared to placebo what was the result of Danhong injection combined with Naoxintong capsule for 12 weeks on left ventricular ejection fraction?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At 12 weeks of treatment the level of NO had significantly elevated in both groups, but the change in the treatment group was obviously larger than that in the control group (P < 0.05)
[ "significantly increased" ]
9939
13727
5863299
Compared to placebo what was the result of Danhong injection combined with Naoxintong capsule for 12 weeks on The overall response rate?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At 12 weeks of treatment the level of NO had significantly elevated in both groups, but the change in the treatment group was obviously larger than that in the control group (P < 0.05)
[ "significantly increased" ]
9940
13732
4734805
Compared to nepafenac 0.1% what was the result of bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution on The central retinal thickness?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The central retinal thickness did not show significant changes after treatment when compared to baseline as follows: in the bromfenac group (247.2±32.9 vs 252.0±24.9 μm; P=0.958) and in nepafenac group (250.8±34 vs 264.0±34.1 μm; P=0.137), respectively.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9941
13733
3656395
Compared to usual care what was the result of a comprehensive programme on diabetes outcome measures (HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol, BMI).?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Table II shows that compared with usual care the comprehensive programme did not result in statistically significant improvements in the diabetes outcome measures (HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol, BMI).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9942
13734
5850768
Compared to 3 mg/kg of infliximab what was the result of 3 mg/kg of SB2 on Immunogenicity?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Immunogenicity was comparable between SB2 and INF with no statistically significant difference.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9943
13735
5850768
Compared to 3 mg/kg of infliximab what was the result of 3 mg/kg of SB2 on The overall efficacy?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Immunogenicity was comparable between SB2 and INF with no statistically significant difference.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9944
13736
5850768
Compared to 3 mg/kg of infliximab what was the result of 3 mg/kg of SB2 on the safety profile?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Immunogenicity was comparable between SB2 and INF with no statistically significant difference.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9945
13737
3643086
Compared to placebo what was the result of atorvastatin 80 mg/day on temporal variation of biomarker levels (IL-6, VCAM-1, ET-1)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No significant difference was observed on the temporal variation of biomarker levels (IL-6, VCAM-1, ET-1) between treatment and control groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9946
13738
3643086
Compared to placebo what was the result of atorvastatin 80 mg/day on intrahospital mortality rate?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No significant difference was observed on the temporal variation of biomarker levels (IL-6, VCAM-1, ET-1) between treatment and control groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9947
13739
5866333
Compared to placebo what was the result of sitagliptin on growth hormone (GH)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Sitagliptin enhanced stimulated GH secretion (P<0.01 versus placebo, for 30 minutes) and free insulin–like growth factor‐1 (P<0.001 versus placebo, after adjustment for baseline) in women.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9948
13740
5866333
Compared to placebo what was the result of sitagliptin on Vasodilation and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity in women?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Sitagliptin enhanced stimulated GH secretion (P<0.01 versus placebo, for 30 minutes) and free insulin–like growth factor‐1 (P<0.001 versus placebo, after adjustment for baseline) in women.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9949
13741
5866333
Compared to placebo what was the result of sitagliptin on free insulin–like growth factor‐1, GH?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Sitagliptin enhanced stimulated GH secretion (P<0.01 versus placebo, for 30 minutes) and free insulin–like growth factor‐1 (P<0.001 versus placebo, after adjustment for baseline) in women.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9950
13742
5866333
Compared to placebo what was the result of sitagliptin on vascular resistance?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Sitagliptin enhanced stimulated GH secretion (P<0.01 versus placebo, for 30 minutes) and free insulin–like growth factor‐1 (P<0.001 versus placebo, after adjustment for baseline) in women.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9951
13743
3680603
Compared to normal saline what was the result of 5,000 U/kg ulinastatin on Cardiac markers (isoenzyme creatine kinase with muscle and brain subunits [CK-MB] or troponin-I) and the brain natriuretic peptide?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Cardiac markers (isoenzyme creatine kinase with muscle and brain subunits [CK-MB] or troponin-I) and the brain natriuretic peptide level were significantly higher in both groups than the respective preoperative values (p<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9952
13744
3680603
Compared to normal saline what was the result of 5,000 U/kg ulinastatin on fibrinogen, creatinine, lactate, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Cardiac markers (isoenzyme creatine kinase with muscle and brain subunits [CK-MB] or troponin-I) and the brain natriuretic peptide level were significantly higher in both groups than the respective preoperative values (p<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9953
13745
3680603
Compared to normal saline what was the result of 5,000 U/kg ulinastatin on duration of mechanical ventilator support, ICU stay, chest tube drainage for postoperative 6 hours, chest tube indwelling time, hospital stay, transfusion amounts, or postoperative complications?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Cardiac markers (isoenzyme creatine kinase with muscle and brain subunits [CK-MB] or troponin-I) and the brain natriuretic peptide level were significantly higher in both groups than the respective preoperative values (p<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9954
13747
5805261
Compared to switching monopolar (SM) separable clustered (SC) electrodes what was the result of switching bipolar (SB) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on number of ablation, ablation time, and energy delivery?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
In the SB-RFA group, less number of ablations were required (1.72±0.70 vs. 2.31±1.37, P = 0.039), the ablation time was shorter (10.9±3.9 vs.14.3±5.0 min, p = 0.004), and energy delivery was smaller (13.1±6.3 vs.23.4±12.8 kcal, p<0.001) compared to SM-RFA.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9955
13748
5805261
Compared to switching monopolar (SM) separable clustered (SC) electrodes what was the result of switching bipolar (SB) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on Ablation volume?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
In the SB-RFA group, less number of ablations were required (1.72±0.70 vs. 2.31±1.37, P = 0.039), the ablation time was shorter (10.9±3.9 vs.14.3±5.0 min, p = 0.004), and energy delivery was smaller (13.1±6.3 vs.23.4±12.8 kcal, p<0.001) compared to SM-RFA.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9956
13749
5805261
Compared to switching monopolar (SM) separable clustered (SC) electrodes what was the result of switching bipolar (SB) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on free survival rates?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
In the SB-RFA group, less number of ablations were required (1.72±0.70 vs. 2.31±1.37, P = 0.039), the ablation time was shorter (10.9±3.9 vs.14.3±5.0 min, p = 0.004), and energy delivery was smaller (13.1±6.3 vs.23.4±12.8 kcal, p<0.001) compared to SM-RFA.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9957
13750
3668104
Compared to Group A - normal saline what was the result of Group B dexmedetomidine 0.2 µg/kg/hr, Group C dexmedetomidine 0.4 µg/kg/hr on bispectral index (BIS) at 90 min?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Group A was significantly different compared to Group B and C (P < 0.05): at 90 min (Group A: 86.5 ± 9.2 min, Group B: 85.1 ± 9.6 min, and Group C: 71.7 ± 11.6 min)
[ "significantly increased" ]
9958
13752
3668104
Compared to Group A - normal saline, dexmedetomidine 0.2 µg/kg/hr - Group B what was the result of Group C dexmedetomidine 0.4 µg/kg/hr on heart rate and mean arterial pressure?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Group A was significantly different compared to Group B and C (P < 0.05): at 90 min (Group A: 86.5 ± 9.2 min, Group B: 85.1 ± 9.6 min, and Group C: 71.7 ± 11.6 min)
[ "no significant difference" ]
9959
13753
3668104
Compared to Group A - normal saline what was the result of Group B dexmedetomidine 0.2 µg/kg/hr, Group C dexmedetomidine 0.4 µg/kg/hr on post anesthetic care unit (PACU), modified aldrete score (MAS) for 30 min?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Group A was significantly different compared to Group B and C (P < 0.05): at 90 min (Group A: 86.5 ± 9.2 min, Group B: 85.1 ± 9.6 min, and Group C: 71.7 ± 11.6 min)
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9960
13755
5985618
Compared to CO2-laser cryptolysis (CO2-LC) - Group B what was the result of temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TC-RF) tonsil ablation - Group A on Mean rank of pain score?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Pain levels in Group A were greater than in Group B at all time points, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9961
13756
5985618
Compared to CO2-laser cryptolysis (CO2-LC) - Group B what was the result of temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TC-RF) tonsil ablation - Group A on The amount of bleeding?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Pain levels in Group A were greater than in Group B at all time points, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9962
13757
5985618
Compared to CO2-laser cryptolysis (CO2-LC) - Group B what was the result of temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TC-RF) tonsil ablation - Group A on duration of procedure?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Pain levels in Group A were greater than in Group B at all time points, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9963
13758
3641305
Compared to NAT2 genotype-guided treatment (PGx-treatment) what was the result of STD-treatment: approx. 5&nbsp;mg/kg of isoniazid for all) on INH-related drug-induced liver injury?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The incidence of combined unfavorable events, defined by early therapeutic failure or INH-related drug-induced liver injury, was significantly lower in the combined population of rapid and slow acetylators; 17.0 % in the PGx-treatment and 48.1 % in the STD-treatment (relative risk; 0.354 [95%CI: 0.177, 0.707], p = 0.001 (Table 3c)).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9964
13759
3641305
Compared to NAT2 genotype-guided treatment (PGx-treatment) what was the result of STD-treatment: approx. 5&amp;nbsp;mg/kg of isoniazid for all) on combined unfavorable events?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The incidence of combined unfavorable events, defined by early therapeutic failure or INH-related drug-induced liver injury, was significantly lower in the combined population of rapid and slow acetylators; 17.0 % in the PGx-treatment and 48.1 % in the STD-treatment (relative risk; 0.354 [95%CI: 0.177, 0.707], p = 0.001 (Table 3c)).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9965
13760
2836833
Compared to 500 mg calcium what was the result of 1500 mg calcium on Fecal fat loss?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Fecal fat loss expressed as percent of fat intake was significantly higher with 1500 mg (high-Ca) compared to 500 mg (low-Ca) calcium intake per day (mean: 3.0%; the 95% CI: 2.3 to 3.7%; P <0.001) independent of calcium source and lactose digestion status.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9966
13761
2836833
Compared to 500 mg calcium what was the result of 1500 mg calcium on Urinary calcium excretion?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Fecal fat loss expressed as percent of fat intake was significantly higher with 1500 mg (high-Ca) compared to 500 mg (low-Ca) calcium intake per day (mean: 3.0%; the 95% CI: 2.3 to 3.7%; P <0.001) independent of calcium source and lactose digestion status.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9967
13762
2836833
Compared to 500 mg calcium what was the result of 1500 mg calcium on weight loss?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Fecal fat loss expressed as percent of fat intake was significantly higher with 1500 mg (high-Ca) compared to 500 mg (low-Ca) calcium intake per day (mean: 3.0%; the 95% CI: 2.3 to 3.7%; P <0.001) independent of calcium source and lactose digestion status.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9968
13763
2836833
Compared to 500 mg calcium what was the result of 1500 mg calcium on systolic or diastolic blood pressure?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Fecal fat loss expressed as percent of fat intake was significantly higher with 1500 mg (high-Ca) compared to 500 mg (low-Ca) calcium intake per day (mean: 3.0%; the 95% CI: 2.3 to 3.7%; P <0.001) independent of calcium source and lactose digestion status.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9969
13764
5789501
Compared to Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) using the ultrasound guidance what was the result of anatomical landmark-guided (LMG) technique on range of motion and SPADI at 4-week?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Both the groups showed statistically similar improvement of VAS, range of motion and SPADI at 4-week (P > 0.05) follow-up
[ "no significant difference" ]
9970
13766
4028193
Compared to control what was the result of Internet-based computerized cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) program in Manga format on Depression (Beck Depression Inventory II; BDI-II)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No significant difference was observed in the remission based on BDI-II between the intervention and control groups: relative risk (RR) of having subthreshold depression in the intervention group were 0.79 (p = 0.22) at the 3-month follow-up and 0.77 (p = 0.20) at the 6-month follow-up;
[ "no significant difference" ]
9971
13767
4028193
Compared to control what was the result of Internet-based computerized cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) program in Manga format on Kessler's psychological distress scale (K6)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No significant difference was observed in the remission based on BDI-II between the intervention and control groups: relative risk (RR) of having subthreshold depression in the intervention group were 0.79 (p = 0.22) at the 3-month follow-up and 0.77 (p = 0.20) at the 6-month follow-up;
[ "no significant difference" ]
9972
13769
5732507
Compared to standard care (SC) condition plus time-equivalent attention-control on disease prevention what was the result of enhanced intervention (EI) condition of SC PMTCT plus the “Protect Your Family” intervention prevention of mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) of HIV on infant HIV status at 6&nbsp;weeks and at 12&nbsp;months?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There were no significant differences between SC and EI on infant HIV status at 6 weeks and at 12 months, and no differences in maternal adherence at 32 weeks, reported infant adherence at 6 weeks, or PMTCT and HIV knowledge by study condition over time.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9973
13770
5844532
Compared to placebo what was the result of RGTA® (OTR4131)—Equitend® on improved cross-sectional area (CSA)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
After 4 months, the number of Equitend® treated horses with an improved CSA was significantly higher than the placebo-treated horses (p = 0.03571).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9974
13772
5844532
Compared to placebo what was the result of RGTA® (OTR4131)—Equitend® on recurrence?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
After 4 months, the number of Equitend® treated horses with an improved CSA was significantly higher than the placebo-treated horses (p = 0.03571).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9975
13776
2921405
Compared to control milk what was the result of 2.4 g/day of prebiotic oligosaccharide and 1.9×107 colony forming unit (c.f.u)/day of probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on diarrhea?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Overall, there was no effect of prebiotic and probiotic on diarrhea (6% reduction, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: −1 to 12%; p = 0.08).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9976
13777
2921405
Compared to control milk what was the result of 2.4 g/day of prebiotic oligosaccharide and 1.9×107 colony forming unit (c.f.u)/day of probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on dysentery episodes?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Overall, there was no effect of prebiotic and probiotic on diarrhea (6% reduction, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: −1 to 12%; p = 0.08).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9977
13778
2921405
Compared to control milk what was the result of 2.4 g/day of prebiotic oligosaccharide and 1.9×107 colony forming unit (c.f.u)/day of probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on Incidence of pneumonia, severe acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Overall, there was no effect of prebiotic and probiotic on diarrhea (6% reduction, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: −1 to 12%; p = 0.08).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9978
13779
2921405
Compared to control milk what was the result of 2.4 g/day of prebiotic oligosaccharide and 1.9×107 colony forming unit (c.f.u)/day of probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on days with severe illness and high fever?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Overall, there was no effect of prebiotic and probiotic on diarrhea (6% reduction, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: −1 to 12%; p = 0.08).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9979
13782
3474778
Compared to control what was the result of high-performance water filter and jerry cans for safe storage on The quality of water?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The quality of water stored in intervention households was significantly better than in control households (3 vs. 181 TTC/100 mL, respectively, p<0.001).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9980
13783
3474778
Compared to control what was the result of high-performance water filter and jerry cans for safe storage on Diarrhea longitudinal prevalence in children &lt;2 years?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The quality of water stored in intervention households was significantly better than in control households (3 vs. 181 TTC/100 mL, respectively, p<0.001).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9981
13784
3474778
Compared to control what was the result of high-performance water filter and jerry cans for safe storage on For all household members?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The quality of water stored in intervention households was significantly better than in control households (3 vs. 181 TTC/100 mL, respectively, p<0.001).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9982
13785
3474778
Compared to control what was the result of high-performance water filter and jerry cans for safe storage on Weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The quality of water stored in intervention households was significantly better than in control households (3 vs. 181 TTC/100 mL, respectively, p<0.001).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9983
13789
3672718
Compared to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) treatment. what was the result of epirubicin (E) containing chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) on RFS (relapse free survival) and OS (overall survival)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
In patients with TIMP-1 immunoreactivity there is a trend towards an increase in RFS (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.93; Figure 2A) and OS (HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.00) in patients treated with E-CMF compared to CMF alone.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9984
13794
1065070
Compared to Sham operation; Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide 15 ng/kg per min intravenously for 6 hours what was the result of oleic acid 0.06 ml/kg intravenously over 30 min. on extravascular lung water (EVLW)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At the end of experiment, values for EVLWST (mean ± standard error) were 8.9 ± 0.6, 11.8 ± 1.0 and 18.2 ± 0.9 ml/kg in the sham-operated, lipopolysaccharide and oleic acid groups, respectively (P < 0.05).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9985
13795
1065070
Compared to Sham operation; Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide 15 ng/kg per min intravenously for 6 hours what was the result of oleic acid 0.06 ml/kg intravenously over 30 min. on postmortem gravimetric extravascular lung water (EVLWG)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At the end of experiment, values for EVLWST (mean ± standard error) were 8.9 ± 0.6, 11.8 ± 1.0 and 18.2 ± 0.9 ml/kg in the sham-operated, lipopolysaccharide and oleic acid groups, respectively (P < 0.05).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9986
13796
5976899
Compared to traditional physiotherapy (TP) group what was the result of traditional physiotherapy-Mulligan mobilization (TPMM) group on range of motion (ROM), kinesiophobia, depression, and quality of life (QoL)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
When comparing effects of these two treatment programs, it was observed that the TPMM group had a better outcome (p < 0.05) in terms of ROM, kinesiophobia, depression, and QoL.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9987
13797
5976899
Compared to traditional physiotherapy (TP) group what was the result of traditional physiotherapy-Mulligan mobilization (TPMM) group on pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), right/left neck rotation, left lateral flexion ROM, and mental health subcategory of SF-36?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
When comparing effects of these two treatment programs, it was observed that the TPMM group had a better outcome (p < 0.05) in terms of ROM, kinesiophobia, depression, and QoL.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9988
13798
3775760
Compared to placebo what was the result of 12 mg Opal-HIV-Gag(c) group on area under the curve (AUC) for Rev?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was an apparent response in area under the curve (AUC) for Rev (p = 0.012 before correction for multiple tests) for the 12 mg Opal-HIV-Gag(c) group compared with pooled placebo participants (n = 8) (data not shown; these data are described more fully in a separate manuscript), but this was not significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9989
13799
4644318
Compared to fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through including transforaminal (TF) what was the result of fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through the Parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) on Effective pain relief?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Effective pain relief [numeric rating scale (NRS) < 3] was observed in 77.3% (95% CI: 67‒90.5%) of patients in PIL group and 74.2% (95% CI: 62.4 - 89.4%) of patients in the TF group (P = 0.34), at 4 weeks.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9990
13800
4644318
Compared to fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through including transforaminal (TF) what was the result of fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through the Parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) on effective pain relief [numerical rating scale (NRS)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Effective pain relief [numeric rating scale (NRS) < 3] was observed in 77.3% (95% CI: 67‒90.5%) of patients in PIL group and 74.2% (95% CI: 62.4 - 89.4%) of patients in the TF group (P = 0.34), at 4 weeks.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9991
13801
4644318
Compared to fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through including transforaminal (TF) what was the result of fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through the Parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) on Number of patients with improved disability?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Effective pain relief [numeric rating scale (NRS) < 3] was observed in 77.3% (95% CI: 67‒90.5%) of patients in PIL group and 74.2% (95% CI: 62.4 - 89.4%) of patients in the TF group (P = 0.34), at 4 weeks.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9992
13802
4644318
Compared to fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through including transforaminal (TF) what was the result of fluoroscopically guided epidural injection, through the Parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) on adverse effects?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Effective pain relief [numeric rating scale (NRS) < 3] was observed in 77.3% (95% CI: 67‒90.5%) of patients in PIL group and 74.2% (95% CI: 62.4 - 89.4%) of patients in the TF group (P = 0.34), at 4 weeks.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9993
13803
5891985
Compared to metformin what was the result of liraglutide on fasting total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein cholesterin (LDL-C)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
However, in the present study, there were no significant differences between 120 min values and fasting values in ΔTC and ΔLDL-C with respect to metformin treatment. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in plasma lipids and lipoprotein after liraglutide treatment compared with the basal values (shown in Additional file 1: Table S1).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9994
13805
5891985
Compared to metformin what was the result of liraglutide on plasma insulin level (area under the curve (AUCins)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
However, in the present study, there were no significant differences between 120 min values and fasting values in ΔTC and ΔLDL-C with respect to metformin treatment. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in plasma lipids and lipoprotein after liraglutide treatment compared with the basal values (shown in Additional file 1: Table S1).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9995
13807
5891985
Compared to metformin what was the result of liraglutide on soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) levels?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
However, in the present study, there were no significant differences between 120 min values and fasting values in ΔTC and ΔLDL-C with respect to metformin treatment. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in plasma lipids and lipoprotein after liraglutide treatment compared with the basal values (shown in Additional file 1: Table S1).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9996
13808
4590915
Compared to Group I (Control) was given conservative management what was the result of Group II (Rhubarb) received conservative management along with Rhubarb capsule (350 mg, thrice daily) on total urine volume (TUV), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
As compared to control group, Rhubarb group showed significant (P < 0.05) reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 12 weeks of treatment (Table 1).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9997
13809
4590915
Compared to Group I (Control) was given conservative management what was the result of Group II (Rhubarb) received conservative management along with Rhubarb capsule (350 mg, thrice daily) on serum potassium?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
As compared to control group, Rhubarb group showed significant (P < 0.05) reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 12 weeks of treatment (Table 1).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9998
13810
4590915
Compared to Group I (Control) was given conservative management what was the result of Group II (Rhubarb) received conservative management along with Rhubarb capsule (350 mg, thrice daily) on serum calcium, TUV, GFR?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
As compared to control group, Rhubarb group showed significant (P < 0.05) reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 12 weeks of treatment (Table 1).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9999
13811
4590915
Compared to Group I (Control) was given conservative management what was the result of Group II (Rhubarb) received conservative management along with Rhubarb capsule (350 mg, thrice daily) on total urine protein (TUP)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
As compared to control group, Rhubarb group showed significant (P < 0.05) reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 12 weeks of treatment (Table 1).
[ "significantly decreased" ]