id
stringlengths
1
5
question_id
stringlengths
1
5
document_id
stringlengths
5
7
question
stringlengths
55
970
type
stringclasses
1 value
choices
list
context
stringlengths
0
971
answer
sequence
9700
13377
4391192
Compared to control what was the result of sleep with earplugs and eye masks on urinary melatonin levels and cortisol levels?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
quality The independent samples t-test showed subjective sleep quality in the intervention group was significantly higher than in the control group (P <0.05)
[ "no significant difference" ]
9701
13378
3747867
Compared to computer-assisted self-management (CASM) what was the result of CASM plus DD-specific problem solving (CAPS) on Medication adherence?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was a significant A0–A12 treatment group effect, indicating that patients in CAPS had more improvement in medication adherence than those in CASM (P = 0.02) and Leap Ahead (P = 0.006)
[ "significantly increased" ]
9702
13379
3747867
Compared to computer-assisted self-management (CASM) what was the result of CASM plus DD-specific problem solving (CAPS) on HbA1c?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was a significant A0–A12 treatment group effect, indicating that patients in CAPS had more improvement in medication adherence than those in CASM (P = 0.02) and Leap Ahead (P = 0.006)
[ "no significant difference" ]
9703
13380
5799985
Compared to conventional pulpectomy what was the result of mixture of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline (3MIX)-MP on clinical success?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Although the difference in clinical success was not statistically significant,
[ "no significant difference" ]
9704
13387
5755650
Compared to perindopril and the T/L type calcium antagonist benidipine what was the result of perindopril and the L-type calcium antagonist amlodipine on The change of eGFR?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The change of eGFR showed no significant difference between the amlodipine group (-1.58 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the benidipine group (0.83 ± 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m2) (P = 0.170).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9705
13388
5755650
Compared to perindopril and the T/L type calcium antagonist benidipine what was the result of perindopril and the L-type calcium antagonist amlodipine on The absolute change of urinary albumin excretion?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The change of eGFR showed no significant difference between the amlodipine group (-1.58 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the benidipine group (0.83 ± 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m2) (P = 0.170).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9706
13389
5755650
Compared to perindopril and the T/L type calcium antagonist benidipine what was the result of perindopril and the L-type calcium antagonist amlodipine on systolic and diastolic blood pressure?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The change of eGFR showed no significant difference between the amlodipine group (-1.58 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the benidipine group (0.83 ± 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m2) (P = 0.170).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9707
13394
2528216
Compared to placebo what was the result of tiotropium 18 μg daily on Mean (SE) increase in duration of activities?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The differences between groups were minor at week 4 prior to pulmonary rehabilitation (279 vs 253 minutes, Figure 3). Differences between groups were not statistically significant.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9708
13398
3659004
Compared to placebo what was the result of CoQ10 on the difference in response after occlusion in blood flow between US-born Asians and Caucasians ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
As shown in Figure 4, the difference in response after occlusion in blood flow between US-born Asians and Caucasians (panel A) was eliminated after 2-week administration of Coq10 panel B (p>0.05, ANOVA). The placebo group showed no change in their response (p>0.05, ANOVA)
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9709
13399
5333470
Compared to sufentanil alone what was the result of combining dexmedetomidine with sufentanil on Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Evaluation of pain score on VASR (a) and VASC (b) (Values represent means with 95% confidence interval) in the two groups. P < 0.001 by General Linear Model analysis, subsequent comparison between the groups: asterisk = P < 0.023 in VASR and P < 0.02 in VASC after the post hoc analyses, dexmedetomidine group vs. control group
[ "significantly increased" ]
9710
13400
5333470
Compared to sufentanil alone what was the result of combining dexmedetomidine with sufentanil on Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) score?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Evaluation of pain score on VASR (a) and VASC (b) (Values represent means with 95% confidence interval) in the two groups. P < 0.001 by General Linear Model analysis, subsequent comparison between the groups: asterisk = P < 0.023 in VASR and P < 0.02 in VASC after the post hoc analyses, dexmedetomidine group vs. control group
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9711
13401
5333470
Compared to sufentanil alone what was the result of combining dexmedetomidine with sufentanil on sufentanil consumption at 48 h postoperatively?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Evaluation of pain score on VASR (a) and VASC (b) (Values represent means with 95% confidence interval) in the two groups. P < 0.001 by General Linear Model analysis, subsequent comparison between the groups: asterisk = P < 0.023 in VASR and P < 0.02 in VASC after the post hoc analyses, dexmedetomidine group vs. control group
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9712
13402
5333470
Compared to sufentanil alone what was the result of combining dexmedetomidine with sufentanil on Cumulative of meperidine supplementary doses at each time intervals after surgery?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Evaluation of pain score on VASR (a) and VASC (b) (Values represent means with 95% confidence interval) in the two groups. P < 0.001 by General Linear Model analysis, subsequent comparison between the groups: asterisk = P < 0.023 in VASR and P < 0.02 in VASC after the post hoc analyses, dexmedetomidine group vs. control group
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9713
13403
5333470
Compared to sufentanil alone what was the result of combining dexmedetomidine with sufentanil on risk of PONV during the 6 to 48 h?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Evaluation of pain score on VASR (a) and VASC (b) (Values represent means with 95% confidence interval) in the two groups. P < 0.001 by General Linear Model analysis, subsequent comparison between the groups: asterisk = P < 0.023 in VASR and P < 0.02 in VASC after the post hoc analyses, dexmedetomidine group vs. control group
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9714
13404
5884508
Compared to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) what was the result of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPDS) on Median weight loss?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Median weight loss at follow-up was 1.5-fold higher following BPDS relative to RYGB, resulting in respective median BMIs of 29.5 kg/m2 (21.7 to 36.7) after BPDS and 37.8 kg/m2 (34.1 to 45.7) after RYGB (p = 0.015).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9715
13406
5884508
Compared to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) what was the result of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPDS) on total tissue?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Median weight loss at follow-up was 1.5-fold higher following BPDS relative to RYGB, resulting in respective median BMIs of 29.5 kg/m2 (21.7 to 36.7) after BPDS and 37.8 kg/m2 (34.1 to 45.7) after RYGB (p = 0.015).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9716
13409
1065104
Compared to equal volume of saline what was the result of 750 μmol/kg magnesium sulfate was given intramuscularly immediately after surgery. on The dye content of each hemisphere?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The dye content of each hemisphere was significantly lower in the magnesium-treated septic rats (left hemisphere, 0.00218 ± 0.0005; right hemisphere, 0.00199 ± 0.0007 [all results are means ± standard deviation]) than in control septic animals (left hemisphere, 0.00466 ± 0.0002; right hemisphere, 0.00641 ± 0.0003).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9717
13410
1065104
Compared to equal volume of saline what was the result of 750 μmol/kg magnesium sulfate was given intramuscularly immediately after surgery. on specific gravity?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The dye content of each hemisphere was significantly lower in the magnesium-treated septic rats (left hemisphere, 0.00218 ± 0.0005; right hemisphere, 0.00199 ± 0.0007 [all results are means ± standard deviation]) than in control septic animals (left hemisphere, 0.00466 ± 0.0002; right hemisphere, 0.00641 ± 0.0003).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9718
13411
5873829
Compared to GFD with prednisolone (GFD+P) what was the result of gluten-free diet (GFD) on clinical recovery at eight weeks?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No significant differences were detected in clinical recovery at eight weeks
[ "no significant difference" ]
9719
13412
5873829
Compared to GFD with prednisolone (GFD+P) what was the result of gluten-free diet (GFD) on improvement in histology by at least one grade at 12 months?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No significant differences were detected in clinical recovery at eight weeks
[ "no significant difference" ]
9720
13414
5862001
Compared to placebo or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DCCBs) or olmesartan what was the result of dual combination [DCCB + thiazide diuretic (TD)] or olmesartan dual combination (DCCB or TD) or triple combination therapy (DCCB+TD) on Smoothness indexes and treatment-on-variability indexes?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Smoothness indexes and treatment-on-variability indexes were significantly (P = 0.0001) higher under olmesartan dual (1.53/1.22, 1.67/1.29, 2.05/1.59), olmesartan triple (2.47/1.85, 2.80/2.06, 3.64/2.67), or active control dual combination (1.70/1.26, 1.85/1.33, 2.29/1.65) than under monotherapies (control: 0.86/0.73, 0.80/0.65, 1.01/0.82; olmesartan: 1.02/0.86, 0.95/0.78, 1.23/1.00).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9721
13415
5862001
Compared to olmesartan dual combination (olmesartan and TD what was the result of olmesartan dual combination (olmesartan and DCCB) on 24-h blood pressure?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Smoothness indexes and treatment-on-variability indexes were significantly (P = 0.0001) higher under olmesartan dual (1.53/1.22, 1.67/1.29, 2.05/1.59), olmesartan triple (2.47/1.85, 2.80/2.06, 3.64/2.67), or active control dual combination (1.70/1.26, 1.85/1.33, 2.29/1.65) than under monotherapies (control: 0.86/0.73, 0.80/0.65, 1.01/0.82; olmesartan: 1.02/0.86, 0.95/0.78, 1.23/1.00).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9722
13416
5735484
Compared to oral midazolam and regional bupivacaine what was the result of oral midazolam with oral clonidine and regional bupivacaine or oral midazolam and regional clonidine with bupivacaine on Time for the first analgesic request ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Time for the first analgesic request was shorter in Group I (2.83 h) compared to Group II (4.43 h) and Group III (3.98 h), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.161) [Table 3].
[ "no significant difference" ]
9723
13417
5735484
Compared to oral midazolam and regional bupivacaine or oral midazolam and regional clonidine with bupivacaine what was the result of oral midazolam with oral clonidine and regional bupivacaine on parental separation and sedation score?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Time for the first analgesic request was shorter in Group I (2.83 h) compared to Group II (4.43 h) and Group III (3.98 h), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.161) [Table 3].
[ "significantly increased" ]
9724
13423
5599826
Compared to self-exercise group what was the result of augmented reality (AR)-based otago exercise or yoga group on eye open center of pressure-x (EO CoP-x)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Regarding balance, eye open center of pressure-x (EO CoP-x) was significantly (p<0.05) decreased in AR group and yoga group.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9725
13424
5599826
Compared to self-exercise group or yoga group what was the result of augmented reality (AR)-based otago exercise on eye close center of pressure (EC COP-x), eye open standard deviation-x (EO SD-x), and eye open height of ellipse (EO HoE)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Regarding balance, eye open center of pressure-x (EO CoP-x) was significantly (p<0.05) decreased in AR group and yoga group.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9726
13425
5599826
Compared to self-exercise group or yoga group what was the result of augmented reality (AR)-based otago exercise on morse fall scale?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Regarding balance, eye open center of pressure-x (EO CoP-x) was significantly (p<0.05) decreased in AR group and yoga group.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9727
13426
5388709
Compared to placebo what was the result of β-alanine (BA) on voluntary or electrically evoked isometric force production, or twitch electromechanical delay and time-to-peak tension?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
BA supplementation had no effect on voluntary or electrically evoked isometric force production, or twitch electromechanical delay and time-to-peak tension.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9728
13427
5388709
Compared to placebo what was the result of β-alanine (BA) on percentage change in fresh muscle HRT?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
BA supplementation had no effect on voluntary or electrically evoked isometric force production, or twitch electromechanical delay and time-to-peak tension.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9729
13428
5388709
Compared to placebo what was the result of β-alanine (BA) on percentage change in fatigued muscle HRT?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
BA supplementation had no effect on voluntary or electrically evoked isometric force production, or twitch electromechanical delay and time-to-peak tension.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9730
13429
2556743
Compared to control what was the result of minimizing the variation in arterial pulse pressure (ΔPP) induced by mechanical ventilation. on amount of HES and the total amount of fluid?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
During the surgical procedure, the amount of HES and the total amount of fluid (including crystalloid, HES, and blood products) was significantly greater in group I than in group C (Table 2).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9731
13430
2556743
Compared to control what was the result of minimizing the variation in arterial pulse pressure (ΔPP) induced by mechanical ventilation. on duration of mechanical ventilation, stay in the ICU, stay in hospital ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
During the surgical procedure, the amount of HES and the total amount of fluid (including crystalloid, HES, and blood products) was significantly greater in group I than in group C (Table 2).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9732
13431
2556743
Compared to control what was the result of minimizing the variation in arterial pulse pressure (ΔPP) induced by mechanical ventilation. on The number of patients with postoperative complications?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
During the surgical procedure, the amount of HES and the total amount of fluid (including crystalloid, HES, and blood products) was significantly greater in group I than in group C (Table 2).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9733
13432
5966929
Compared to received the gestural training after the completion of research what was the result of received four 30-min robot-based gestural training sessions on The proportion of accurate trials ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The proportion of accurate trials with the participants with ASD in the intervention condition was greater than that for the participants with typical development, p < .001, and for the participants with ASD in the wait-list control condition, p < .001
[ "significantly increased" ]
9734
13434
3499555
Compared to DNA testing what was the result of mRNA testing on inadequate samples?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Furthermore, mRNA had significantly more inadequate samples (36 vs. 14, p = 0.007).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9735
13435
3499555
Compared to DNA testing what was the result of mRNA testing on specificity and PPV ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Furthermore, mRNA had significantly more inadequate samples (36 vs. 14, p = 0.007).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9736
13436
5440036
Compared to 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron, what was the result of 7.5 μg/kg palonosetron or 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron and 15 μg/kg droperidol on The nausea severity?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The nausea severity in Group P7.5 and Group P+D was significantly lower than that in Group P2.5 at 0–4 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0159, PP2.5–P+D=0.0003) and 24–48 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0032, PP2.5–P+D=0.0032), while the nausea score between Group P7.5 and Group P+D was similar (P=0.3580).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9737
13437
5440036
Compared to 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron, what was the result of 7.5 μg/kg palonosetron or 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron and 15 μg/kg droperidol on the vomiting scores?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The nausea severity in Group P7.5 and Group P+D was significantly lower than that in Group P2.5 at 0–4 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0159, PP2.5–P+D=0.0003) and 24–48 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0032, PP2.5–P+D=0.0032), while the nausea score between Group P7.5 and Group P+D was similar (P=0.3580).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9738
13438
5440036
Compared to 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron and 15 μg/kg droperidol what was the result of 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron on The CR rate?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The nausea severity in Group P7.5 and Group P+D was significantly lower than that in Group P2.5 at 0–4 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0159, PP2.5–P+D=0.0003) and 24–48 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0032, PP2.5–P+D=0.0032), while the nausea score between Group P7.5 and Group P+D was similar (P=0.3580).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9739
13439
5440036
Compared to 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron, what was the result of 7.5 μg/kg palonosetron or 2.5 μg/kg palonosetron and 15 μg/kg droperidol on The recovery time?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The nausea severity in Group P7.5 and Group P+D was significantly lower than that in Group P2.5 at 0–4 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0159, PP2.5–P+D=0.0003) and 24–48 h (PP2.5–P7.5=0.0032, PP2.5–P+D=0.0032), while the nausea score between Group P7.5 and Group P+D was similar (P=0.3580).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9740
13440
4710520
Compared to latanoprost, lubricant, and DTFC for 4 weeks each what was the result of dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination (DTFC) and lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each on The difference of IOP?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The difference of IOP between the two treatments was 0.39 ± 0.21 mmHg (mean ± SE) and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.07).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9741
13442
4710520
Compared to latanoprost, lubricant, and DTFC for 4 weeks each what was the result of dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination (DTFC) and lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each on Diurnal systolic and diastolic BP?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The difference of IOP between the two treatments was 0.39 ± 0.21 mmHg (mean ± SE) and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.07).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9742
13443
4710520
Compared to latanoprost, lubricant, and DTFC for 4 weeks each what was the result of dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination (DTFC) and lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each on The heart rate?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The difference of IOP between the two treatments was 0.39 ± 0.21 mmHg (mean ± SE) and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.07).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9743
13444
4710520
Compared to latanoprost, lubricant, and DTFC for 4 weeks each what was the result of dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination (DTFC) and lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each on Diurnal OPP and DOPP?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The difference of IOP between the two treatments was 0.39 ± 0.21 mmHg (mean ± SE) and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.07).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9744
13445
4360612
Compared to non-surgical management what was the result of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants on Six-month satisfaction rates?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Six-month satisfaction rates were higher in the surgery group compared to the NSM group (79.0 vs. 27.3% very satisfied, p<.0001);
[ "significantly increased" ]
9745
13446
4360612
Compared to non-surgical management what was the result of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants on The mean number of adverse events per subject?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Six-month satisfaction rates were higher in the surgery group compared to the NSM group (79.0 vs. 27.3% very satisfied, p<.0001);
[ "no significant difference" ]
9746
13447
4360612
Compared to non-surgical management what was the result of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants on number of patient exhibited pain improvement of ≥20 points?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Six-month satisfaction rates were higher in the surgery group compared to the NSM group (79.0 vs. 27.3% very satisfied, p<.0001);
[ "significantly increased" ]
9747
13448
4360612
Compared to non-surgical management what was the result of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants on success rates?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Six-month satisfaction rates were higher in the surgery group compared to the NSM group (79.0 vs. 27.3% very satisfied, p<.0001);
[ "significantly increased" ]
9748
13449
4360612
Compared to non-surgical management what was the result of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants on number of patient that had ODI improvement of ≥15 points?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Six-month satisfaction rates were higher in the surgery group compared to the NSM group (79.0 vs. 27.3% very satisfied, p<.0001);
[ "significantly increased" ]
9749
13457
4360719
Compared to standard care what was the result of 2 h (1 h individually tailored exercise training and 1 h education programme) every 3 months for 1 year. on CRQ dyspnoea score, the ESWT distance between the two groups, BMI, body fat EQ5D, MET-minutes, activity rating, HADS, exacerbations or admissions?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
No statistically significant differences were detected between the intervention and control groups for the CRQ dyspnoea score (0.19 (−0.26 to 0.64) units) or other domains of the CRQ, the ESWT distance between the two groups (109.1 (−100.1 to 318.2) metres), BMI, body fat EQ5D, MET-minutes, activity rating, HADS, exacerbations or admissions (table 2).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9750
13458
4210953
Compared to control what was the result of short message service (SMS) on PHQ, GAD, or WSAS scores?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Intervention and control groups did not differ significantly on their intake PHQ, GAD, or WSAS scores, suggesting similar levels of psychological distress.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9751
13459
4210953
Compared to control what was the result of short message service (SMS) on treatment completion, treatment length, number of sessions attended, or DNA rate?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Intervention and control groups did not differ significantly on their intake PHQ, GAD, or WSAS scores, suggesting similar levels of psychological distress.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9752
13460
3258215
Compared to a written manual on the implementation of EAFD and EASD what was the result of intensive support for the implementation on the frequency of providing EAFD and EASD of statins in community pharmacies?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
In the intervention group a total of 72 of 469 new statin users (15.4%) received education and 49 of 393 patients with a second statin prescription (12.5%) compared to 78 of 402 new users (19.4%, P = 0.944) and 35 of 342 patients with a second prescription (10.2%, P = 0.579) in the control group.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9753
13461
4769147
Compared to control group (standard approach, SA). what was the result of controlled limited formula (CLF) intervention (10 ml formula by syringe after each breastfeeding, discontinued at onset of lactation) on rates of exclusive as well as any breastfeeding at discharge, 3 months and 6 months of infants’ age ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
We found no evidence of difference between treatment groups in the rates of exclusive as well as any breastfeeding at discharge (p-value 0.2 and >0.99 respectively), 3 months (p-value 0.12 and 0.10) and 6 months of infants’ age (p-value 0.45 and 0.34 respectively).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9754
13462
4769147
Compared to control group (standard approach, SA). what was the result of controlled limited formula (CLF) intervention (10 ml formula by syringe after each breastfeeding, discontinued at onset of lactation) on maximal body weight loss?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
We found no evidence of difference between treatment groups in the rates of exclusive as well as any breastfeeding at discharge (p-value 0.2 and >0.99 respectively), 3 months (p-value 0.12 and 0.10) and 6 months of infants’ age (p-value 0.45 and 0.34 respectively).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9755
13463
4769147
Compared to control group (standard approach, SA). what was the result of controlled limited formula (CLF) intervention (10 ml formula by syringe after each breastfeeding, discontinued at onset of lactation) on Levels of bilirubin above 200 umol/l?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
We found no evidence of difference between treatment groups in the rates of exclusive as well as any breastfeeding at discharge (p-value 0.2 and >0.99 respectively), 3 months (p-value 0.12 and 0.10) and 6 months of infants’ age (p-value 0.45 and 0.34 respectively).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9756
13464
3659156
Compared to empiric what was the result of hemodynamic, in which treatment choice considered impedance cardiography results on blood pressure values?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
All final blood pressure values were lower in the hemodynamic group, significantly for office systolic blood pressure (empiric vs. hemodynamic: 136.1 vs. 131.6 mmHg; p=0.036) and diastolic blood pressure (87.0 vs. 83.7 mmHg; p=0.013), as well as night-time systolic blood pressure (121.3 vs. 117.2 mmHg; p=0.023) and diastolic blood pressure (71.9 vs. 68.4 mmHg; p=0.007).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9757
13465
3770450
Compared to 4-week control period after a 2-week washout, or vice versa what was the result of 2-hour session of Thai traditional massage twice a week for 4 weeks on Serum P1NP?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Serum P1NP increased significantly after Thai traditional massage (P <0.01),
[ "significantly increased" ]
9758
13466
3770450
Compared to 4-week control period after a 2-week washout, or vice versa what was the result of 2-hour session of Thai traditional massage twice a week for 4 weeks on serum osteocalcin or CTX?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Serum P1NP increased significantly after Thai traditional massage (P <0.01),
[ "no significant difference" ]
9759
13467
3611074
Compared to control what was the result of 1 mg/kg ketorolac on median preoperative anxiety score in the pediatric ward and in the operating room?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was no significant difference in the median preoperative anxiety score using mYAS between two groups in the pediatric ward (median: 23.3 and range: 23.3-23.3 in the control group vs. median 23.3 and range: 23.3-30.0 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.178) and in the operating room (median: 31.7 and range: 25.0-41.7 in the control group vs. median: 31.7 and range: 27.5-47.5 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.447).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9760
13468
3611074
Compared to control what was the result of 1 mg/kg ketorolac on the incidence of EA at 5, 20 min ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was no significant difference in the median preoperative anxiety score using mYAS between two groups in the pediatric ward (median: 23.3 and range: 23.3-23.3 in the control group vs. median 23.3 and range: 23.3-30.0 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.178) and in the operating room (median: 31.7 and range: 25.0-41.7 in the control group vs. median: 31.7 and range: 27.5-47.5 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.447).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9761
13469
3611074
Compared to control what was the result of 1 mg/kg ketorolac on The total number of patients displaying EA?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was no significant difference in the median preoperative anxiety score using mYAS between two groups in the pediatric ward (median: 23.3 and range: 23.3-23.3 in the control group vs. median 23.3 and range: 23.3-30.0 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.178) and in the operating room (median: 31.7 and range: 25.0-41.7 in the control group vs. median: 31.7 and range: 27.5-47.5 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.447).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9762
13470
3611074
Compared to control what was the result of 1 mg/kg ketorolac on the number of children who received fentanyl for analgesia after 20 min in the PACU?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
There was no significant difference in the median preoperative anxiety score using mYAS between two groups in the pediatric ward (median: 23.3 and range: 23.3-23.3 in the control group vs. median 23.3 and range: 23.3-30.0 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.178) and in the operating room (median: 31.7 and range: 25.0-41.7 in the control group vs. median: 31.7 and range: 27.5-47.5 in the ketorolac group, P = 0.447).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9763
13471
5654748
Compared to 10 000 Steps programme what was the result of Web 2.0-based intervention on physical activity behaviour on average number of days per week with a step entry, average time per week on the website and average number of website visits per week?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The Web 2.0 group had significantly higher average number of days per week with a step entry, average time per week on the website and average number of website visits per week at 0–3, 3–12 and 12–18 months compared with the Web 1.0 group (table 4).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9764
13472
5654748
Compared to 10 000 Steps programme what was the result of Web 2.0-based intervention on physical activity behaviour on average number of days per week with a step comment at 0–3 months;?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The Web 2.0 group had significantly higher average number of days per week with a step entry, average time per week on the website and average number of website visits per week at 0–3, 3–12 and 12–18 months compared with the Web 1.0 group (table 4).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9765
13473
5654748
Compared to 10 000 Steps programme what was the result of Web 2.0-based intervention on physical activity behaviour on average number of days per week with a step comment at 3–12 and 12–18 months.?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The Web 2.0 group had significantly higher average number of days per week with a step entry, average time per week on the website and average number of website visits per week at 0–3, 3–12 and 12–18 months compared with the Web 1.0 group (table 4).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9766
13474
4768925
Compared to control what was the result of intravenous drips of butylphthalide on The NIHSS score and levels of ACTH and COR?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The NIHSS score and levels of ACTH and COR of the treatment group were significantly lower than those of the control group (p<0.05).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9767
13479
5055753
Compared to 2 mg oral midazolam what was the result of 0.2 mg oral clonidine on The percentages of patients in the calm and sedated scale?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The percentages of patients in the calm and sedated scale were significantly higher in the clonidine group (35 and 42.5%, respectively), compared to the midazolam group (17.5 and 17.5%, respectively) (P = 0.042, 0.029; respectively).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9768
13480
5055753
Compared to 2 mg oral midazolam what was the result of 0.2 mg oral clonidine on the percentages of patients in the agitated and heavily sedated?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The percentages of patients in the calm and sedated scale were significantly higher in the clonidine group (35 and 42.5%, respectively), compared to the midazolam group (17.5 and 17.5%, respectively) (P = 0.042, 0.029; respectively).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9769
13481
5055753
Compared to 2 mg oral midazolam what was the result of 0.2 mg oral clonidine on The mean ± SD of intraoperatively administered fentany?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The percentages of patients in the calm and sedated scale were significantly higher in the clonidine group (35 and 42.5%, respectively), compared to the midazolam group (17.5 and 17.5%, respectively) (P = 0.042, 0.029; respectively).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9770
13482
5055753
Compared to 2 mg oral midazolam what was the result of 0.2 mg oral clonidine on Mean ± SD of heart rate?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The percentages of patients in the calm and sedated scale were significantly higher in the clonidine group (35 and 42.5%, respectively), compared to the midazolam group (17.5 and 17.5%, respectively) (P = 0.042, 0.029; respectively).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9771
13487
2826289
Compared to placebo what was the result of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 on the Patient Pain Assessment score ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Subjects who received Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 experienced borderline statistically significant improvement in the Patient Pain Assessment score (P = .052
[ "no significant difference" ]
9772
13488
2826289
Compared to placebo what was the result of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 on Pain Scale ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Subjects who received Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 experienced borderline statistically significant improvement in the Patient Pain Assessment score (P = .052
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9773
13489
2826289
Compared to placebo what was the result of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 on physician global assessment or physician assessment of painful and swollen joints?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Subjects who received Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 experienced borderline statistically significant improvement in the Patient Pain Assessment score (P = .052
[ "no significant difference" ]
9774
13490
2826289
Compared to placebo what was the result of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 on the ability to walk 2 miles and the ability to reach?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
Subjects who received Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 experienced borderline statistically significant improvement in the Patient Pain Assessment score (P = .052
[ "no significant difference" ]
9775
13495
4525725
Compared to generic health risk feedback what was the result of tailored health risk feedback on The mean number of topics discussed?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The mean number of topics discussed did not differ between those who received the generic (M = 2.87, SD = 2.39) versus the tailored feedback (M = 2.83, SD = 2.28; t(85) = 0.08, p = .94).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9776
13496
4525725
Compared to generic health risk feedback what was the result of tailored health risk feedback on the average number of additional actions related to survey health risks taken by the GP?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The mean number of topics discussed did not differ between those who received the generic (M = 2.87, SD = 2.39) versus the tailored feedback (M = 2.83, SD = 2.28; t(85) = 0.08, p = .94).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9777
13497
4525725
Compared to generic health risk feedback what was the result of tailored health risk feedback on participants who show report to their GP?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The mean number of topics discussed did not differ between those who received the generic (M = 2.87, SD = 2.39) versus the tailored feedback (M = 2.83, SD = 2.28; t(85) = 0.08, p = .94).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9778
13498
4525725
Compared to generic health risk feedback what was the result of tailored health risk feedback on Participants who agree that the feedback was ‘relevant to me’ ?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The mean number of topics discussed did not differ between those who received the generic (M = 2.87, SD = 2.39) versus the tailored feedback (M = 2.83, SD = 2.28; t(85) = 0.08, p = .94).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9779
13501
5827507
Compared to 5% potassium nitrate (KNO3) what was the result of combined 5% KNO3 and the diode laser or gallium-aluminum-arsenide diode laser (62.2 J/cm2, wavelength - 980 nm, noncontact pulse mode, and power wattage - 0.5 W); on Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
A significant reduction in DH was observed for Group 3 (GaAlA laser diode and 5% KNO3) and Group 2 (GaAlA laser diode) than Group 1 (5% KNO3).
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9780
13502
4170701
Compared to range-of-motion home exercise (ROM) what was the result of combined home exercise (COMB) on ESR, CRP, Hb, grip strength, BAS-G, BASFI, and BASDAI, either at baseline or after 3-month exercise?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
On the follow-up of disease activity and functional ability, no significant statistical difference was found between the two groups in ESR, CRP, Hb, grip strength, BAS-G, BASFI, and BASDAI, either at baseline or after 3-month exercise (Table 5).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9781
13503
4170701
Compared to range-of-motion home exercise (ROM) what was the result of combined home exercise (COMB) on variables of pulmonary function test?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
On the follow-up of disease activity and functional ability, no significant statistical difference was found between the two groups in ESR, CRP, Hb, grip strength, BAS-G, BASFI, and BASDAI, either at baseline or after 3-month exercise (Table 5).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9782
13505
5777419
Compared to placebo what was the result of probiotic or antibiotic on the total cultivable microbiota?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At microbiological level, the total cultivable microbiota decreased significantly in the probiotic and antibiotic groups. In the placebo group, the prevalence of subjects with P. gingivalis decreased. However, there were no significant differences between groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9783
13506
5777419
Compared to placebo what was the result of probiotic or antibiotic on attachment gain, reduction of PPD, and reduction of plaque?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
At microbiological level, the total cultivable microbiota decreased significantly in the probiotic and antibiotic groups. In the placebo group, the prevalence of subjects with P. gingivalis decreased. However, there were no significant differences between groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9784
13507
3881817
Compared to irrigation with 10 mL 2.0% chlorhexidine (CHX) what was the result of irrigation with a final application of EC40TM on Specimens not leaking?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
EC40TM exhibited a similar behaviour to 2% CHX.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9785
13508
3881817
Compared to without final irrigation or irrigation with the combination (1:1) of 0.2% CHX + 0.1% cetrimide (CTR). what was the result of irrigation with a final application of EC40TM on Specimens not leaking?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
EC40TM exhibited a similar behaviour to 2% CHX.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9786
13509
3881817
Compared to irrigation with 10 mL 2.0% chlorhexidine (CHX) or irrigation with the combination (1:1) of 0.2% CHX + 0.1% cetrimide (CTR). what was the result of without final irrigation on Specimens not leaking?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
EC40TM exhibited a similar behaviour to 2% CHX.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9787
13518
1522015
Compared to placebo (24 weeks) was administered prior to lutein what was the result of lutein supplementation (10 mg/d for 12 wks followed by 30 mg/d) for the first 24 weeks and then placebo for the following 24 weeks on The mean log retinal area?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The mean log retinal area when the participants were on lutein was 0.018 higher (95% CI: 0.001, 0.036, p value: 0.038) than when they received placebo, but the visual field deteriorated throughout the study (change per week: -0.2%, 95% CI: -0.003, -0.001, p value< 0.001).
[ "significantly increased" ]
9788
13519
1522015
Compared to placebo (24 weeks) was administered prior to lutein what was the result of lutein supplementation (10 mg/d for 12 wks followed by 30 mg/d) for the first 24 weeks and then placebo for the following 24 weeks on the average log CS at normal illumination?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The mean log retinal area when the participants were on lutein was 0.018 higher (95% CI: 0.001, 0.036, p value: 0.038) than when they received placebo, but the visual field deteriorated throughout the study (change per week: -0.2%, 95% CI: -0.003, -0.001, p value< 0.001).
[ "no significant difference" ]
9789
13520
1913939
Compared to condition that provided print materials on the same topics what was the result of the Web-based condition on change in weight?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The ANCOVA analyses for reported weight indicated that there was no significant differential change in weight between the two groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9790
13521
1913939
Compared to condition that provided print materials on the same topics what was the result of the Web-based condition on Physical Activity?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The ANCOVA analyses for reported weight indicated that there was no significant differential change in weight between the two groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9791
13522
1913939
Compared to condition that provided print materials on the same topics what was the result of the Web-based condition on Attitudes Toward a Healthful Diet*?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The ANCOVA analyses for reported weight indicated that there was no significant differential change in weight between the two groups.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9792
13523
1913939
Compared to condition that provided print materials on the same topics what was the result of the Web-based condition on Dietary Stage of Change?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The ANCOVA analyses for reported weight indicated that there was no significant differential change in weight between the two groups.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9793
13524
1913939
Compared to condition that provided print materials on the same topics what was the result of the Web-based condition on Stress Management?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The ANCOVA analyses for reported weight indicated that there was no significant differential change in weight between the two groups.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9794
13525
3616693
Compared to glaucoma filtration operation with no implantation of chitosan membrane (as control) // or drug-free chitosan membrane implantation (blank/placebo group) // or membrane containing 5-FU treatment (5-FU group) what was the result of membrane containing MMC treatment on The survival period of the bleb?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The survival period of the bleb in the MMC group was significantly prolonged compared with the other three groups (P < 0.01); 35% of blebs had disappeared at day 10 after operation.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9795
13526
3616693
Compared to glaucoma filtration operation with no implantation of chitosan membrane (as control) // or drug-free chitosan membrane implantation (blank/placebo group) // or membrane containing 5-FU treatment (5-FU group) what was the result of membrane containing MMC treatment on IOP-decrease period?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The survival period of the bleb in the MMC group was significantly prolonged compared with the other three groups (P < 0.01); 35% of blebs had disappeared at day 10 after operation.
[ "significantly increased" ]
9796
13527
4756971
Compared to control what was the result of peritubal analgesic infiltration on The average VAS pain at 1 and 4 hours?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The average VAS pain at 1 and 4 hours after the operation in the study group was 4.64±2.73 and 3.41±2.28 compared with 7.11±2.33 and 4.40±2.21 in the control group (P≤0.001 and 0.026), respectively.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9797
13528
4756971
Compared to control what was the result of peritubal analgesic infiltration on The postoperative VAS pain at 12, 24 and 48 hours?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The average VAS pain at 1 and 4 hours after the operation in the study group was 4.64±2.73 and 3.41±2.28 compared with 7.11±2.33 and 4.40±2.21 in the control group (P≤0.001 and 0.026), respectively.
[ "no significant difference" ]
9798
13529
4756971
Compared to control what was the result of peritubal analgesic infiltration on Doses of morphine usage for controlling postoperative pain?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The average VAS pain at 1 and 4 hours after the operation in the study group was 4.64±2.73 and 3.41±2.28 compared with 7.11±2.33 and 4.40±2.21 in the control group (P≤0.001 and 0.026), respectively.
[ "significantly decreased" ]
9799
13530
4756971
Compared to control what was the result of peritubal analgesic infiltration on The first analgesic demand (minutes)?
multiple_choice
[ "significantly increased", "no significant difference", "significantly decreased" ]
The average VAS pain at 1 and 4 hours after the operation in the study group was 4.64±2.73 and 3.41±2.28 compared with 7.11±2.33 and 4.40±2.21 in the control group (P≤0.001 and 0.026), respectively.
[ "significantly increased" ]