Datasets:

torilla

/

toxic_reason_ver1

like 0

thats economic is out of jew hand he built german culture not jew he knew jew control stalin rosvelt

Toxic.

This sentence contains anti-Semitic language and promotes harmful stereotypes about Jewish people. The phrase "out of jew hand" implies that Jews are controlling or manipulating something, which is a common trope in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Additionally, the statement "he knew jew control stalin rosvelt" suggests that Jews controlled prominent leaders, which is another harmful stereotype. This type of language can contribute to a hostile and discriminatory environment, making it toxic.

they probably think the religion was hijacked by radicals and not by the moderates :-) but it's a good start ..

Toxic.

The sentence contains a veiled criticism of an entire religion, implying that it has been "hijacked" by extremists. This kind of language can be seen as perpetuating negative stereotypes and stigmatizing a particular religious group. Additionally, the tone of the sentence comes across as condescending and dismissive, which can be alienating and offensive to those who identify with the religion being discussed. The use of a smiley face at the end does not mitigate the toxicity of the statement, as it may be seen as insincere or flippant in light of the serious implications of the sentence's content.

bring out the dogs and water cannons, we're being invaded

Toxic.

The sentence promotes violence and aggression towards others, specifically advocating for the use of force (dogs and water cannons) to repel an perceived invasion. This kind of language can incite harm and hostility towards individuals or groups, and contributes to a toxic atmosphere of fear and mistrust.

thanks so much really love what u do and what you stand for .. hope to see u in the uk sometime xx

No Toxic.

The sentence appears to be a genuine expression of gratitude and admiration, with no offensive language, personal attacks, or hateful tone. The use of informal language (e.g., "u" instead of "you") and affectionate expressions (e.g., "xx") suggests a friendly and enthusiastic tone, rather than toxic intent.

fudge your satanic values bubbles

Toxic.

The sentence contains profanity and insults, specifically using the word "satanic" to describe someone's values. This language is aggressive, offensive, and intended to provoke or demean the target. Additionally, the use of the phrase "fudge your" is a veiled way of expressing hostility or anger towards the person being addressed. Overall, the sentence has a clear intent to harm, offend, or intimidate, which are all characteristics of toxic language.

we don't want your anti-white hate in our state .

Toxic.

The sentence contains discriminatory language and promotes exclusion based on race. The phrase "anti-white hate" is a dog whistle for racist ideologies, implying that any criticism of white privilege or racism is itself hateful. This kind of rhetoric can contribute to a hostile environment and perpetuate discrimination against marginalized communities.

they better stary with 2:106 of koran & though written for jew objection can be applied to all of the korans hate / intolerance

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it promotes hate and intolerance towards a specific religious group, Jews, and implies that the Quran, a sacred text in Islam, is filled with hate and intolerance. The sentence also makes a sweeping generalization about an entire religion, which can be perceived as offensive and discriminatory. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is divisive and inflammatory, which can contribute to a toxic online environment.

is this the real " white power " " ? "

No Toxic.

The sentence contains a phrase that is associated with hateful and discriminatory beliefs, which can be hurtful or offensive to individuals or groups based on their race, ethnicity, or other characteristics.

yes . a racist of the highest kind ; a screwball feminist ; a windbag who was able to suck in female followers . yes .

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it uses derogatory and discriminatory language, specifically the term "racist of the highest kind", which promotes hate speech and discrimination towards a particular group of people. Additionally, the sentence uses sexist language by referring to someone as a "screwball feminist", implying that feminism is something negative or ridiculous. The tone of the sentence is also aggressive and mocking, further contributing to its toxic nature.

: shocking : south african negroes livin ' large eating sushi off white models via yho ! !

Toxic.

This sentence contains multiple forms of toxic data, including racism, objectification, and explicit content. The use of the racial slur "negroes" is offensive and dehumanizing, while the phrase "eating sushi off white models" is a clear example of objectification and exploitation. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is sensationalized and provocative, implying that the described scenario is somehow shocking or taboo. Overall, this sentence promotes harmful attitudes towards marginalized groups and perpetuates a culture of disrespect and degradation.

forget this white nationalist mess . i'm america first . so is our great potus and true patriots . color has nothing to do with being a nationalist libnuts ! if you don't want a strong america why are you in america ?

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data due to its promotion of white nationalism, which is a hateful and discriminatory ideology. The phrase "America First" is often associated with far-right nationalist movements that prioritize the interests of one racial or ethnic group over others. Additionally, the use of derogatory terms like "libnuts" to refer to individuals who disagree with this ideology is a form of name-calling and ad hominem attack. Furthermore, the sentence implies that anyone who doesn't support a "strong America" (which is often code for a nationalist or authoritarian regime) has no right to be in the country, which is a form of xenophobia and exclusionary rhetoric. Overall, this sentence contains harmful and discriminatory language that can contribute to a toxic online environment.

just cut aid and let the africans govern themselves into the ground.

Toxic.

This sentence is toxic because it contains racist and condescending undertones. The phrase "let the Africans govern themselves into the ground" implies that Africans are incapable of governing themselves effectively, which is a harmful stereotype rooted in colonialism and racism. Additionally, the suggestion to "cut aid" can be seen as dismissive of the global responsibility to support developing nations and address systemic inequalities. Overall, the sentence perpetuates harmful attitudes towards Africa and its people, which can contribute to a toxic environment.

wow what a huge turnout . could find anymore whitebread that lives on mommy's couch ? enjoy jail retards ! ! ! counterexample to " white pride " " "

Toxic.

This sentence contains several elements of toxic data, including: * Pejorative language: The term "whitebread" is a derogatory slur used to describe people who are perceived as privileged and lacking in cultural diversity. It's often used in a derogatory manner to demean individuals or groups. * Ableism: The use of the word "retards" is an ableist slur, which is a hate speech term that dehumanizes and marginalizes people with intellectual or developmental disabilities. * Incitement to violence: The phrase "enjoy jail" can be interpreted as encouraging harm or punishment towards others, which is a form of toxic rhetoric. * Hate speech: The sentence appears to be mocking the concept of "white pride," which is often associated with white supremacist ideologies. The use of derogatory language and ableist slurs in this context contributes to a harmful and discriminatory tone. Overall, this sentence contains multiple forms of hate speech, ableism, and incitement to violence, making it a clear example of toxic data.

you go guys white power

Toxic.

The sentence contains a hate symbol, "white power," which is a phrase often associated with white supremacist ideologies. This phrase is commonly used to promote racist and discriminatory beliefs, and its use can contribute to a hostile and offensive environment. Additionally, the casual tone of the sentence ("you go guys") may downplay the severity of the sentiment being expressed, making it even more insidious.

i don't think they necessarily drink coke ... i mean there's gta be a reason they're all so crazy hyper .

No Toxic.

The sentence is expressing a neutral opinion about people who may drink Coke, and making an observation about their behavior without attacking or insulting anyone. The tone is casual and conversational, with no hate speech, offensive language, or discriminatory remarks.

if you want to live under the constitution you must give up natural order. natural, animalized order is all non-reform muslims know

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it promotes discrimination and intolerance towards a specific religious group (Muslims) by implying that they are inherently uncivilized and incapable of reform. The use of the phrase "animalized order" is particularly offensive, as it dehumanizes and degrades an entire community. Additionally, the sentence suggests that Muslims who do not conform to a certain standard are somehow less deserving of living under a constitution, which is a fundamental right. This kind of language can contribute to a culture of hate and bigotry.

because the whites in charge are self-hating . they're still in charge though . white supremacy . :/

Toxic.

The sentence contains racist and discriminatory language, specifically targeting a particular racial group (whites) with hate speech. The phrase "white supremacy" is also a harmful and offensive term that perpetuates harmful stereotypes and discrimination. Additionally, the tone of the sentence implies blame and hostility towards an entire group of people based on their race, which is toxic and promotes harmful attitudes.

no the has done that not we really don't need any more bs piled on by

No Toxic.

Although the sentence appears to be negative and frustrated, it lacks specific targeting language, personal attacks, or discriminatory tone that would qualify it as toxic. The sentence seems to be expressing frustration with a situation or decision, but does not contain any abusive or harmful content.

your a race hustler just like ya boy al sharpton. you are flat out ignorant

Toxic.

The sentence contains derogatory language and personal attacks, specifically using a racial slur ("race hustler") and making an ad hominem attack on someone's intelligence ("flat out ignorant"). Additionally, it makes a comparison to a public figure in a negative light, which can be seen as inflammatory. Overall, the tone is aggressive and discriminatory, making it toxic.

pl . ban cow slaughter at once . it does not require budget or money .

No Toxic.

The sentence is expressing a strong opinion about banning cow slaughter, but it does not contain any hate speech, offensive language, or personal attacks. The tone is assertive but not aggressive, and the argument is presented in a clear and respectful manner. Additionally, the sentence provides a logical reason to support the claim, which is that it doesn't require budget or money. Overall, the sentence is a passionate expression of opinion rather than toxic data.

where's my alt-right salary ? tell putin i take #bitcoin and #monero ( and any alt coin )

No Toxic.

The sentence contains references to alt-right, a political ideology associated with white nationalism and racism, which can be offensive and harmful to certain groups of people. Additionally, the mention of Putin, a authoritarian leader, may also be seen as promoting or glorifying authoritarianism. Furthermore, the tone of the sentence comes across as entitled and demanding, which can be perceived as aggressive or confrontational.

yep, genetics is racist. jesus, man, quit drinking before it's too late.

Toxic.

The sentence contains two instances of toxic language. Firstly, it makes an unsubstantiated and inflammatory claim that "genetics is racist," which can be perceived as offensive and discriminatory towards people working in the field of genetics. Secondly, the phrase "quit drinking before it's too late" comes across as condescending and judgmental, implying that the person being addressed has a problem with alcohol consumption without any context or evidence. The tone is also somewhat aggressive, with the use of "jesus, man," which can be seen as confrontational. Overall, the sentence promotes harmful stereotypes and uses a divisive tone, making it toxic.

not all ""inferior races"" are mexican or muslim you fool!

Toxic.

The sentence contains derogatory language and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. The use of the term "inferior races" is racist and dehumanizing, implying that certain groups of people are inherently lesser than others. Additionally, the sentence singles out Mexican and Muslim individuals, which can be seen as targeting specific ethnic and religious groups with discriminatory intent. The tone is also aggressive and condescending, with the use of the phrase "you fool!" which further contributes to a hostile and toxic atmosphere.

rt the triumph of mtv's " white people " " via "

No Toxic.

The given sentence appears to be a neutral statement, likely referencing an article or social media post about MTV's documentary series "White People". The use of "rt" suggests it's a retweet, and the quotation marks around "white people" indicate that it's a title. There is no language or tone that promotes hate, discrimination, or harm towards any individual or group, hence it is not considered toxic.

clintons hate black people ! ! ! rt rt rt

No Toxic.

-

;.cant lick em,noon emold age moo tactics,as soon as deah gets de upper hand,bow down now! alahuakbaarrrr

Toxic.

The sentence contains aggressive and threatening language, with phrases such as "cant lick em" and "bow down now!" that imply dominance and submission. Additionally, the mention of "deah gets de upper hand" suggests violence or harm, and the use of "alahuakbaarrrr" at the end may be perceived as a mocking or dismissive tone. The overall tone of the sentence is confrontational and intimidating, making it toxic.

the hecklers are the liberal generation unable to understand discipline and personal learning, growth from errors & difficulty.

Toxic.

This sentence is toxic because it makes a blanket statement that stereotypes an entire generation (liberal) as being unable to understand discipline and personal growth. It implies that people with liberal views are inherently flawed and incapable of learning from their mistakes, which is a harmful and inaccurate assumption. Additionally, the use of the term "hecklers" is derogatory and dehumanizing, implying that individuals who hold different opinions are not worthy of respect or engagement. The sentence promotes divisiveness and intolerance, which can contribute to a toxic online environment.

What do you get when throw a Molotov cocktail into a gay pride parade? An LGBTQBBQ

Toxic.

This sentence is toxic because it promotes violence and discrimination towards the LGBTQ+ community. The reference to throwing a Molotov cocktail, an incendiary device, into a gay pride parade is a clear threat of harm and intimidation. Additionally, the acronym "LGBTQBBQ" is a derogatory and offensive term that mocks and dehumanizes members of the LGBTQ+ community. The sentence as a whole perpetuates harmful stereotypes and hatred, making it toxic and unacceptable.

supreme court declines to review case of marine court-martialed over bible verse . via

No Toxic.

The given sentence appears to be a factual news headline, reporting on a legal case involving the Supreme Court and a marine court-martialed over a Bible verse. There is no inflammatory language, personal attack, or discriminatory content present in the sentence, which suggests that it does not contain toxic data.

but bihar wants otherwise

No Toxic.

The given sentence "but bihar wants otherwise" appears to be a neutral statement expressing a contrast or alternative perspective. It does not contain any hate speech, offensive language, or discriminatory remarks that would qualify it as toxic data. The tone is more informative and assertive rather than aggressive or abusive.

" ... face the reality [ ... ] of the jihad threat .. " " made me crack up . those are the words of xenophobic white people "

No Toxic.

-

it's no secret that white people are native to areas like that . do u now consider orient white ?

No Toxic.

-

merkel sets netanyahu straight on german culpability for holocaust via

No Toxic.

The sentence appears to be a factual statement about a historical event and does not contain any hate speech, offensive language, or discriminatory remarks towards any individual or group. It simply reports on an interaction between two political leaders regarding a historical issue, without expressing a personal opinion or bias.

only 3 years subverting the immigration laws? how is he different than the coyotes bring in illegals from the south?

Toxic.

The sentence contains dehumanizing language and makes an offensive comparison between a person and "coyotes," which is a derogatory term used to describe people who smuggle immigrants across the border. The sentence also perpetuates harmful stereotypes about immigration and implies that someone who has been in the country for only 3 years is not deserving of respect or dignity.

while scores are dying in railway accidents bjp government is making bullet train on paper ! !

No Toxic.

The sentence contains a strong emotional tone and makes an accusation against a specific political party (BJP) without providing evidence. The use of phrases like "scores are dying" creates a sense of urgency and outrage, which can be seen as sensationalist or alarmist. Additionally, the phrase "on paper" is ambiguous and could be interpreted as a pejorative, implying that the government's efforts are not genuine or effective. Overall, the sentence has a divisive tone and may be perceived as inflammatory or provocative.

maybe time to oil up the deer rifles, the ones with the hd night scopes to keep the ""vermin"" population down.

Toxic.

The sentence contains veiled language that promotes violence and discrimination towards a certain group of people, referred to as "vermin". This term is often used to dehumanize and degrade marginalized communities. Additionally, the mention of rifles with night scopes implies a level of preparation for harm or even elimination, which can be seen as a threat or incitement to violence. The overall tone of the sentence is hostile and aggressive, making it toxic.

my point is these white nationalists are quick to give race-based r

No Toxic.

The given sentence does not contain any hate speech, aggressive language, or discriminatory remarks. Although it mentions "white nationalists," which is a controversial topic, the context suggests a critical or observational tone rather than promoting or glorifying their ideology. The sentence appears to be setting up an argument or point about the behavior of white nationalists, but it does not contain toxic data itself.

lol : theek tha ? ? ? but who double crossed whom ... :) #aapwedsaajtak bjp gujarat #akasksmodi #delhi #hdl

No Toxic.

Although the sentence appears to be discussing politics (with hashtags like #aapwedsaajtak, #bjp, and #akasksmodi), it does not contain any abusive language, personal attacks, or hate speech. The tone is casual and conversational, with a playful use of "lol" and multiple question marks, indicating a lighthearted and inquiring tone rather than an aggressive or offensive one.

obama has zero concern for middle class white america he is more dangerous to america than any terrorist

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it promotes hateful and discriminatory rhetoric towards a specific racial group (white Americans) and makes a false and inflammatory comparison between a former US President (Obama) and terrorists. The language used is divisive, racist, and violent, which can contribute to a hostile online environment and perpetuate harmful stereotypes.

Friend: how dark is your humor? Me: If you whip it enough, it will start picking cotton.

Toxic.

The response contains a reference to slavery and racism, which are highly offensive and harmful topics. The mention of "picking cotton" is a clear allusion to the forced labor and brutal treatment of enslaved people in the American South during the 18th and 19th centuries. This kind of language can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and contribute to a toxic environment.

lord, let your enemies be scattered, let them be confounded and be put to shame

Toxic.

This sentence contains violent and vengeful language, wishing harm and shame upon others. The use of the word "enemies" implies a strong sense of opposition and hostility, while the phrases "be scattered", "be confounded", and "be put to shame" express a desire for their downfall and humiliation. This kind of language can contribute to a toxic environment by promoting aggression and intolerance towards others.

fuhrer is our saviour ; all idiot liberals must note .

Toxic.

The sentence promotes a harmful and hateful ideology by glorifying a historical figure associated with Nazism (Fuhrer) and directing derogatory language ("idiot liberals") towards a group of people based on their political beliefs. This kind of rhetoric can incite discrimination, harassment, and even violence against individuals who hold different political views, contributing to a toxic environment.

the indians were the first immigration movement even they had laws and consequences if you broke them?

Toxic.

The sentence contains a harmful stereotype and inaccuracy. It implies that indigenous peoples, referred to as "the Indians", were immigrants to their own land, which is a false narrative that erases their native presence and experiences. This statement perpetuates the erasure of Native American histories and identities, contributing to ongoing marginalization and oppression. Additionally, it oversimplifies complex historical events and legal systems, ignoring the violent colonization and forced assimilation that indigenous peoples faced.

hmmmm immediately after islamic prayers she went to kill .. jew hatred it's in the quran ...

Toxic.

This sentence promotes religious intolerance and hatred towards a specific group of people (Jews) by misinterpreting and misrepresenting a religious text (the Quran). The phrase "it's in the Quran" is used to justify harmful and violent behavior, which is a dangerous and offensive stereotype. Additionally, the sentence implies that Islamic prayers lead to violence, which is a harmful generalization that can fuel discrimination and prejudice. Overall, the sentence contains toxic data as it spreads hate speech, religious intolerance, and misinformation.

let the dogs out

Toxic.

-

go to cabellas and get own with 32 round clips start firing at all illegals before they cross borders

Toxic.

-

democrat.the godless party of filth and hate.

Toxic.

The sentence contains pejorative language, demonizing a specific political party (Democrats) by labeling them as "godless" and associating them with negative qualities like "filth" and "hate". This kind of language can contribute to a divisive and hostile atmosphere, fostering animosity towards individuals who identify with that party.

a lot of people had to take shirts off because they were maced .

No Toxic.

The sentence appears to be a factual description of an event where people were affected by tear gas (mace) and had to remove their shirts as a result. There is no language or tone that promotes hate, aggression, or discrimination towards any individual or group, making it a non-toxic statement.

sunni and shia muslims regard al-ahmadiyya followers as kuffar am i missing something here ?

No Toxic.

The sentence appears to be a genuine question, inquiring about the beliefs of Sunni and Shia Muslims regarding Ahmadiyya followers. The language used is neutral and does not contain any hate speech, insults, or offensive content that could be considered toxic. The tone is more inquisitive than confrontational, suggesting a desire for knowledge or clarification rather than an intention to provoke or offend.

not all immigrants look like this ignorant white trash .

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it uses derogatory language to describe a group of people ("ignorant white trash"), which is a pejorative term that dehumanizes and demeans individuals based on their race. Additionally, the sentence implies that certain immigrants are inferior or unpalatable due to their appearance, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and prejudices. The use of such language can contribute to a hostile environment and reinforce discriminatory attitudes towards marginalized groups.

liberal democracy = it's not okay to be white .

Toxic.

This sentence is toxic because it contains a false and harmful equivalence. The phrase "it's not okay to be white" is a discriminatory statement that implies being white is inherently problematic or unacceptable. This sentiment can contribute to a culture of shame, guilt, and self-discrimination among individuals who identify as white. Furthermore, it may also perpetuate harmful and divisive ideologies that seek to pit different racial groups against each other. Liberal democracy, on the other hand, is a political system that values individual rights, freedoms, and equality for all citizens, regardless of their race or ethnicity. By equating liberal democracy with such a discriminatory statement, this sentence promotes a toxic and harmful narrative.

You can't play with them - they don't speak English.

Toxic.

This sentence contains xenophobic and discriminatory undertones, implying that individuals who do not speak English are inferior or unworthy of interaction. The phrase "you can't play with them" implies exclusion and segregation based on language proficiency, which can be harmful and offensive to non-English speakers.

do you prefer the label white supremacist over white nationalist ?

No Toxic.

-

We don't keep eating utensils in the car. That's what FAT FAT FAT people do.

Toxic.

The sentence contains body shaming and fatphobic language, specifically using the term "FAT FAT FAT" to describe a group of people in a derogatory manner. This kind of language can be harmful and offensive to individuals who may identify with the described characteristic, and it perpetuates negative stereotypes and discrimination towards people based on their weight or appearance.

future white jihadist inshatler

Toxic.

The given sentence contains hate speech and promotes violence and discrimination towards a specific racial group. The term "jihadist" is often associated with extremist or terrorist ideologies, and combining it with "white" creates a harmful and offensive message. Additionally, the made-up word "inshatler" suggests violence or harm towards others, which further contributes to the toxicity of the sentence. Overall, this sentence has the potential to incite hatred and promote harmful behavior.

there is a flurry of tweets and articles claiming to be the " original " " altright and " " kill all jews yay hitler white purity " " . "

No Toxic.

The sentence promotes violence against a specific ethnic group (Jews) and glorifies Hitler, who is known for his role in the Holocaust. It also contains discriminatory language, such as "white purity," which is a racist ideology. This type of language can be harmful and offensive to many individuals, and it has no place in respectful conversation.

it may seem unbelievable to whites in america but there is an anti-white plan underway to replace them . look locally ; its everywhere .

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it promotes a conspiracy theory that is rooted in racist and discriminatory beliefs. The sentence implies that there is a deliberate effort to "replace" white people, which is a harmful and baseless claim that can incite fear, anger, and hostility towards minority groups. Additionally, the sentence uses divisive language by referring to "whites in America" as a separate group, perpetuating an us-versus-them mentality. This type of rhetoric can contribute to a toxic environment of discrimination, xenophobia, and racism.

what do you mean normalize ? it is normal now to see dozens of people killed by the hands of these folks .

No Toxic.

The sentence contains a veiled expression of hatred and intolerance towards a particular group of people, referred to as "these folks". The phrase "dozens of people killed by the hands of these folks" implies a violent and harmful behavior associated with this group, which can be perceived as discriminatory and inflammatory language. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is confrontational and aggressive, contributing to a toxic atmosphere.

the south has already risen again . dixie has an economy larger than germany . we just need independence

Toxic.

The sentence contains toxic data because it promotes secessionist and nationalist ideologies, which can be harmful and divisive. The reference to "Dixie" (a nickname for the Southern United States) and the mention of independence suggest a desire to separate from the rest of the country, which can lead to social unrest and conflict. Additionally, the comparison of the South's economy to Germany's may be an exaggeration or inaccuracy, which can further fuel harmful nationalist sentiments. The overall tone of the sentence is inflammatory and provocative, making it toxic.

: zuckerberg's dream : the anti-white racist social network via

Toxic.

The sentence contains derogatory language and promotes discriminatory ideologies. The term "anti-white racist" is a hate-filled phrase that targets a specific racial group, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and prejudices. Additionally, the sentence implies that Mark Zuckerberg's platform is intentionally designed to discriminate against white people, which is a false and inflammatory accusation. Overall, this sentence contributes to a toxic online environment by spreading hate speech and misinformation.

the flags are great and i'll get one for sure but yeah you guys should do patches and lapel pins as well i would spend money on those .

No Toxic.

The sentence is expressing a positive opinion about flags and suggesting additional products (patches and lapel pins) in a polite and constructive manner. The tone is enthusiastic and encouraging, with no signs of hate speech, aggression, or personal attacks, which are typical characteristics of toxic data.

where are ethnic norwegians going to ? they had better get their boats and invade us again ! we need back up .

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it promotes and glorifies violence, invasion, and aggression towards others based on their ethnicity. The tone is aggressive and discriminatory, implying that the speaker's group needs "back up" from a specific ethnic group, which can be perceived as a threat or a call to action. Additionally, the mention of "invade us again" suggests a historical grievance or trauma, but in a way that romanticizes violence rather than promoting understanding, empathy, or peaceful resolution. Overall, this sentence contributes to a harmful and divisive narrative.

yea we were better offwith the floppy-eared gayblade and his manly wife shipping our 401ks and savin

Toxic.

The sentence contains derogatory language, specifically the use of "gayblade" which is a homophobic slur. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is dismissive and condescending towards a particular individual or group, implying that they are not capable of managing financial matters. This type of language can be harmful and offensive to individuals who identify as LGBTQ+ and can contribute to a culture of discrimination and marginalization.

if merkel thinks 1m syrian immigrants are going to go home peacefully after 2 years she is more deluded than first thought #leaveeu

No Toxic.

The sentence contains a personal attack on Angela Merkel, calling her "deluded". This is a form of ad hominem attack, which is a toxic behavior that involves attacking the person rather than their argument or idea. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is condescending and dismissive, which can contribute to a toxic environment.

and by too racist he means " not devaluing white people enough . " " "

Toxic.

The sentence contains toxic data because it implies that someone who is against racism is actually trying to devalue white people. This sentiment perpetuates a harmful and false narrative that promoting equality and combating racism is somehow an attack on white people. It's a form of gaslighting and can contribute to a toxic environment where marginalized groups are further silenced or oppressed. Additionally, the phrase "not devaluing white people enough" has a condescending tone, implying that the speaker believes white people are inherently superior and need to be protected from being "devalued."

black lives matter has helped trump more that they have helped solve any problems in their communities congrats you played yourself ;)

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it makes a derogatory and inaccurate statement about the Black Lives Matter movement, implying that they have somehow helped Trump more than they've helped their own communities. The tone is also condescending and celebratory, with the phrase "congrats you played yourself" being used to mock and belittle the movement and its supporters. This kind of language can be harmful and alienating, and perpetuates negative stereotypes about social justice movements.

white nationalist do not hate other races we wish only to separate ourselves from them to preserve our heritage culture and identity

Toxic.

This sentence promotes segregation and perpetuates harmful stereotypes based on race. The idea that one race needs to "separate" from others to preserve their heritage, culture, and identity implies that other races are a threat to theirs, which is a harmful and divisive notion. Additionally, the phrase "white nationalist" has been associated with extremist and supremacist ideologies, making this sentence inherently toxic.

white communism now ! ambien borthers

Toxic.

The sentence promotes and glorifies harmful ideologies, specifically white communism, which is often associated with racist and violent beliefs. Additionally, the mention of "Ambien brothers" is unclear but could be referencing a harmful or violent group, further contributing to the toxic nature of the sentence.

remember these antifa are kids who have been led astray . their kids !

No Toxic.

-

- i've examined video clips with people and i see a total different person not media narrative .

No Toxic.

The sentence expresses a personal opinion or observation without containing any hate speech, discriminatory language, or aggressive tone. The speaker is simply stating their differing perspective on someone based on their own examination of video clips, which does not contain any toxic elements.

white lives matter rallies against the blm kidnapping in chicago via

Toxic.

This sentence is toxic because it promotes white supremacy and perpetuates harmful and false narratives about the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. The phrase "white lives matter" is a known dog whistle for white nationalist ideologies, and pairing it with an unsubstantiated claim about BLM kidnapping in Chicago is a clear attempt to spread misinformation and fuel racist sentiment. This type of rhetoric can lead to real-world harm, discrimination, and violence against marginalized communities.

insulting a religion is not racism . its bigotry . racism is hating a race . hence racist .

No Toxic.

The sentence contains a subtle form of toxicity by trying to justify and downplay the severity of insulting a religion by distinguishing it from racism. While technically correct in its definition, the tone and implication can come across as dismissive and unapologetic about the harm caused by religious bigotry. This can be alienating and offensive to people who have experienced religious discrimination or marginalization. Additionally, the sentence's structure and wording may be perceived as confrontational and divisive, which can contribute to a toxic atmosphere in online discourse.

because too many of them are ( ( ( white ) ) ) .

Toxic.

The sentence contains a racial slur and implies that people of a certain race are inferior or problematic. The use of parentheses around "white" is likely an attempt to draw attention to the supposed issue, which can be seen as inflammatory and divisive. This kind of language can contribute to a toxic environment by promoting discrimination and prejudice.

pl . keep an eye on your diplomats ; they r busy in maid business only and r 2 lazy to work 4 economic diplomacy etc .

No Toxic.

This sentence contains derogatory language and makes unfounded accusations against diplomats. The phrase "busy in maid business only" is a demeaning and sexist remark, implying that the diplomats are engaged in inappropriate or unprofessional activities. Additionally, the statement "2 lazy to work 4 economic diplomacy etc." is a personal attack on the diplomats' work ethic and abilities. The tone of the sentence is confrontational and accusatory, which can be harmful and offensive to the individuals being referred to.

i have seen this woman on youtube she is fantastic and so knowledgeable on muslim history and their infestation of the western world

Toxic.

The sentence contains toxic data due to the use of the word "infestation" to describe Muslim presence in the Western world. This term has a strongly negative connotation, implying that Muslims are unwanted or unwelcome in these regions, and is often associated with xenophobic or Islamophobic rhetoric. Additionally, the phrase "Western world" can be seen as perpetuating an "us versus them" mentality, further contributing to the toxic tone of the sentence.

100 % agree . the founders envisioned a white ethno state . ppl disaffected by the flag ought

No Toxic.

-

if you were intelligent, you'd know them and where to find them.

Toxic.

** This sentence is toxic because it contains a condescending tone, implying that the person being addressed lacks intelligence. The phrase "if you were intelligent" is a veiled insult, suggesting that the person is not smart enough to know certain information. Additionally, the sentence comes across as belittling and patronizing, which can be perceived as offensive or hurtful. The tone is aggressive and superior, rather than helpful or informative.

they won't be happy until another white man ( ) falls to his knees and cucks out . #maga

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it promotes racism, misogyny, and hate speech. The use of the phrase "another white man" implies that people of other races are inferior or less deserving of respect. Additionally, the term "cucks out" is a derogatory slang term used to demean and emasculate men, often with racist or sexist connotations. The hashtag "#maga" also suggests support for a political ideology associated with far-right extremism and white nationalism. Overall, this sentence perpetuates harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and violence against marginalized groups, making it toxic.

rubio can blame the nro and weekly standard cucks who begged for him to do it and assured that it would work in his favor .

Toxic.

The sentence contains derogatory language, specifically the use of the term "cucks," which is a pejorative slur often used to demean and dehumanize individuals. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is aggressive and accusatory, with Rubio being blamed and others being described as having begged him to take an action that ultimately didn't work in his favor. The overall sentiment of the sentence is hostile and divisive, contributing to a toxic atmosphere.

all those blax call themselves king[kong] or prince[of evil] when they get to a whitey country

Toxic.

This sentence contains racist and xenophobic undertones. The use of the term "blax" is a derogatory slang term for Black people, implying that they are inferior or less capable than others. Additionally, the phrase "when they get to a whitey country" suggests that White countries are superior and that Black individuals are somehow lesser when they enter these territories. Furthermore, the reference to "king[kong]" and "prince[of evil]" is likely a pejorative comparison, implying that Black people who refer to themselves as royalty are somehow less legitimate or more malevolent than others. Overall, this sentence perpetuates harmful stereotypes and biases against Black individuals and promotes a discriminatory worldview.

zero illegal persons in the united states should be left unevaluated or allowed to believe they have rights- see switzerland+germany+compare

Toxic.

The sentence contains xenophobic and discriminatory language, implying that individuals without legal status in the United States should be stripped of their rights. The tone is hostile and dehumanizing, suggesting that certain groups of people are inferior or undeserving of basic human rights. The reference to Switzerland and Germany may be an attempt to justify or normalize this harmful ideology. Overall, the sentence promotes a toxic and exclusionary worldview.

yes time for people on the right to strap up and start shooting those kids no doubt

Toxic.

-

the worlds biggest racists are actually brown people while white people are the least racist #

Toxic.

This sentence is toxic because it makes a sweeping and inaccurate generalization about an entire group of people based on their race. The statement is divisive, inflammatory, and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. It also has the potential to spark racial tensions and create conflict between different racial groups. Additionally, the sentence implies that racism is inherent to certain racial or ethnic groups, which is a dangerous and misguided notion. Racism is a complex issue that can affect anyone regardless of their race, ethnicity, or background.

white christians can assimilate with white christians in a white christians culture.the fantasy that that can be extended to every race is failing before our eyes .

Toxic.

This sentence promotes segregation and supremacy based on race and religion. The phrase "white Christians" is used to imply that only people of this specific demographic can truly assimilate, excluding others from being part of the culture. Additionally, the sentence implies that attempts at inclusivity and diversity are failing, which can be seen as a veiled attack on multiculturalism and racial harmony. This kind of language can perpetuate harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and even violence against marginalized groups.

there is now a national white privilege conference . why is there not a stop race baiting and stop blaming the white man national conference ?

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it promotes a divisive and discriminatory ideology. The phrase "white privilege" is often associated with critical race theory, which aims to address systemic racism and inequality. However, the sentence twists this concept by implying that discussing white privilege is equivalent to "race baiting" and "blaming the white man," which are pejorative terms that can be seen as dismissive and offensive. The sentence also creates a false equivalence between a conference addressing white privilege and a hypothetical conference about "stopping race baiting and blaming the white man." This framing perpetuates a harmful narrative that people of color, especially Black people, are unfairly targeting or attacking white people when they discuss racism and discrimination. This type of rhetoric can contribute to a toxic environment where marginalized groups feel silenced, dismissed, or even threatened. Overall, the sentence's tone and language choice are inflammatory, divisive, and harmful, making it a clear example of toxic data.

white people are the race of peace .

No Toxic.

-

white and black is none of our business ; only aryans are invited

Toxic.

The sentence contains discriminatory language, promoting exclusion and segregation based on race and ethnicity. The phrase "only Aryans are invited" is particularly problematic, as it implies that people of other racial or ethnic backgrounds are not welcome or valued. This kind of language can contribute to a hostile environment and perpetuate harmful stereotypes and biases.

the bad hombres have already found other ways into our country.wake up

Toxic.

The sentence contains xenophobic and discriminatory language, specifically the term "bad hombres," which is a pejorative term used to dehumanize and demonize individuals from other countries or cultures. Additionally, the phrase "wake up" can be seen as condescending and inflammatory, implying that those who disagree with the sentiment are somehow ignorant or asleep to the issue. The overall tone of the sentence is divisive and promotes harmful stereotypes.

black people say they want to kill white people with hillary clinton it may happen

Toxic.

-

. on #periscope : the cuckturians assaulting white nationalists : the latest

Toxic.

The sentence contains hate speech and promotes violence against a specific group of people, namely white nationalists. The use of the term "cuckturians" is also a derogatory term that is often used to dehumanize and demean individuals. Additionally, the sentence implies that it is acceptable or even desirable to assault someone based on their political beliefs or identity, which is a harmful and dangerous ideology.

zip it, snowflake. just for you, he can scream saddam as he plunges. better?drowned, dipped in acid, burned alive in cages like #isis 4 u?

Toxic.

This sentence contains several toxic elements: 1. **Name-calling and personal attack**: The phrase "zip it, snowflake" is a pejorative term used to belittle and mock someone, which can be perceived as offensive and hurtful. 2. **Violent and disturbing imagery**: The descriptions of screaming, drowning, dipping in acid, and burning alive are graphic and disturbing, potentially causing emotional distress or discomfort for readers. 3. **Reference to violent acts and terrorism**: The mention of #ISIS, a notorious terrorist organization, is used in a context that glorifies violence and extremism, which can be deeply offensive and harmful. Overall, this sentence contains a combination of aggressive language, violent imagery, and references to harmful ideologies, making it toxic.

jews are doing to whites what they did to palestinians . palestinian genocide then white genocide .

Toxic.

This sentence is toxic because it promotes hateful and discriminatory ideologies, specifically antisemitism and racism. The comparison between Jews and Palestinians is misleading and inflammatory, implying that one group is perpetrating violence against another. Additionally, the term "white genocide" is a known white supremacist trope with no basis in reality, aiming to instill fear and promote harmful stereotypes. This type of rhetoric can incite violence, hate crimes, and discrimination against specific ethnic or religious groups, which is unacceptable and dangerous.

then you're an idiot.to start with ns killed oodles of white people and h

Toxic.

This sentence contains a personal attack ("you're an idiot") which is a form of insult and can be perceived as offensive. Additionally, it mentions violence and killing based on racial criteria, which promotes hate speech and discrimination. The language used is aggressive, hurtful, and targets specific groups, making the overall tone toxic and harmful.

Walks into a post office to buy stamps. Me (Hmong American):: Hello, I would like to get the pixar stamps. Clerk:: *Takes out Chinese New Year Stamps, while smiling like she made my day* I think you'll like these. Me:: *Looks at her and the stamps...* No, it's okay. I'll just get the pixar ones. Clerk:: *Pushes the stamps forward* Awkward silence of me thinking... Me:: Okay *Buys and walks away* Clerk:: Xie xie WTF?! with a tickle in my tummy... Did this just really happen to me...?

Toxic.

The sentence is toxic because it contains a racist microaggression. The clerk assumes that the Hmong American customer would be interested in Chinese New Year stamps simply because of their Asian ethnicity, without considering their individual preferences or cultural background. This kind of assumption can be alienating and erasing of one's identity. Additionally, the clerk's insistence on pushing the unwanted stamps forward and saying "Xie xie" (a Mandarin phrase) can be seen as a form of cultural appropriation and stereotyping. The customer's reaction of awkward silence and feeling of discomfort also indicates that they felt disrespected and marginalized in the interaction.

these people come from the north or west go to some ivy league or christian university join professional conservatism

No Toxic.

The given sentence appears to be a neutral, observational statement describing a possible career path or demographic trend. It does not contain any hate speech, discriminatory language, or inflammatory rhetoric that would qualify it as toxic. The mention of specific universities and ideologies is presented in a factual manner without any negative connotations or emotional appeals.

shaun is black . why are you obsessed with his race ? you like white boys ? skinny lil white boys ?

Toxic.

This sentence contains toxic data because it makes an assumption about someone's preferences based on their race, which is a form of discrimination and racism. The use of derogatory terms such as "skinny lil white boys" is also offensive and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is aggressive and confrontational, implying that someone is "obsessed" with Shaun's race, which can be perceived as accusatory and divisive. Overall, the language used in this sentence promotes a toxic and discriminatory environment.

they are the only racial group that are still cannibals even people just related like many islanders eat people

Toxic.

This sentence contains racist and discriminatory language, perpetuating harmful stereotypes about specific racial groups. The mention of cannibalism is also a sensitive topic that can be offensive to some cultures. Additionally, the comparison between "many islanders" and the targeted racial group implies a negative connotation, further reinforcing toxic attitudes.

retweeted elder lansing ( ): demokkkrats you are so angry racist hateful and bitter . hate to ...

No Toxic.

The sentence contains derogatory language towards Democrats, labeling them as "angry", "racist", "hateful", and "bitter". This kind of language can be offensive and divisive, and is not respectful or constructive. Additionally, the tone of the sentence is aggressive and confrontational, which can contribute to a toxic online environment.

shoot couple of this sand niggers, they will learn quick!

Toxic.

-

every india lover must boycott these pigs movies

Toxic.

The sentence contains hate speech and discrimination towards a group of people (in this case, individuals associated with a particular movie or industry). The use of derogatory terms like "pigs" is dehumanizing and promotes a culture of intolerance. Additionally, the sentence encourages boycotts based on national identity, which can lead to further division and hostility. Overall, the language used is inflammatory and has the potential to incite harm towards specific groups of people.