Datasets:

tasksource

/

LogicNLI

like 4

Follow

tasksource 14

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Philbert is alive.

entailment

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Garth is angry.

self_contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Garth is not wild.

self_contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Garth is wild.

self_contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Everett is not wild.

contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Philbert is obedient.

entailment

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Hadden is not alive.

neutral

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Everett is not angry.

contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Hadden is not red.

entailment

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Garth is not red.

contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Philbert is not wild.

self_contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Philbert is not alive.

contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Everett is obedient.

neutral

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Roland is not obedient.

contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Philbert is angry.

self_contradiction

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Uriah is angry.

neutral

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Everett is wild.

entailment

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Uriah is wild.

neutral

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Roland is alive.

entailment

Garth is angry. Roland is wild. Hadden is not red. Philbert is angry. Everett is wild. Uriah is red. Garth is red. Garth is not wild. Philbert is not wild. Sterling is electronic. Everett is angry. Sterling is not angry.It can be concluded that Hadden is red once knowing that Philbert is not alive or Sterling is not electronic. If there is at least one people who is not wild, then Philbert is obedient and Garth is not electronic. Someone being both wild and alive is equivalent to being obedient. Philbert is not angry if and only if Everett is electronic and Philbert is wild. If someone is not obedient and angry, then he is both wild and not alive, and vice versa. If Hadden is not obedient, then Sterling is angry and Sterling is not electronic. Someone who is eithor not angry or electronic is always wild. If Garth is not angry, then Roland is obedient, and vice versa. All electronic people are wild. Hadden being obedient implies that Sterling is not red. If someone is not wild or not electronic, then he is not angry. If there is someone who is obedient, then Sterling is wild.

Uriah is not angry.

neutral

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Kane is ancient.

entailment

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Shawn is impressive.

entailment

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Shawn is ancient.

self_contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Lauren is thankful.

neutral

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Cedric is orange.

entailment

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Keene is orange.

contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Cedric is not thankful.

neutral

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Shawn is not impressive.

contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Trevor is not steep.

self_contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Keene is ancient.

neutral

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Trevor is orange.

self_contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Trevor is not orange.

self_contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Lauren is not orange.

neutral

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Trevor is not impressive.

self_contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Cedric is not orange.

contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Sheridan is ancient.

neutral

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Shawn is not thoughtless.

contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Sheridan is not orange.

contradiction

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Cedric is steep.

entailment

Lauren is steep. Lauren is not thoughtless. Kane is not thankful. Trevor is thankful. Trevor is impressive. Sheridan is orange. Keene is not orange. Cedric is not ancient. Trevor is not ancient. Shawn is thoughtless. Sheridan is not thoughtless. Kane is ancient.If Kane is not ancient, then Kane is orange and Kane is not steep. Someone is thoughtless and orange if and only if he is not ancient. If there is at least one people who is thoughtless, then Shawn is not ancient and Trevor is orange. Cedric being steep implies that Cedric is thoughtless. If all people are not orange, then Keene is not steep. If someone is orange and thoughtless, then he is both steep and ancient, and vice versa. As long as someone is thankful, he is not steep and not orange. If someone who is ancient is also not thoughtless, then he is not steep. All thankful people are not orange. If there is someone who is not steep, then Trevor is not impressive. Someone who is thoughtless is always both impressive and orange. Lauren being not thankful implies that Sheridan is impressive.

Lauren is steep.

entailment

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Keene is careful.

self_contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Melville is not tender.

entailment

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Baldwin is not nutty.

entailment

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Kirk is careful.

neutral

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Keene is not hungry.

entailment

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Keene is not careful.

self_contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Baldwin is nutty.

contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Kathryn is tender.

self_contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Baldwin is tender.

entailment

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

James is ugliest.

entailment

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

James is not ugliest.

contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Kathryn is not ugliest.

contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

James is not modern.

contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Kirk is ugliest.

neutral

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Kathryn is not tender.

self_contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Keene is nutty.

contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

James is careful.

neutral

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Keene is not modern.

self_contradiction

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Baldwin is not hungry.

neutral

Kathryn is modern. Kathryn is tender. Kathryn is nutty. Aldis is not nutty. James is not hungry. Keene is not modern. Keene is not hungry. James is modern. James is not tender. Keene is not ugliest. Melville is not tender. Baldwin is tender.If someone who is not hungry is also not tender, then he is ugliest. It can be concluded that Keene is tender once knowing that Melville is not nutty or James is careful. If someone is both not modern and not nutty, then he is not careful. Melville being not hungry and James being nutty imply that Kirk is careful. If there is someone who is either ugliest or not tender, then Baldwin is not nutty. Melville is not nutty and Kirk is careful if and only if Baldwin is hungry and Keene is tender. Someone being both not ugliest and not nutty is equivalent to being careful. If someone is not tender and careful, then he is not ugliest, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not nutty, then Melville is not modern. If someone is not tender, then he is modern, and vice versa. If Melville is not ugliest, then Kirk is careful and Kirk is not nutty, and vice versa. If someone is not tender or modern, then he is not hungry.

Kirk is not careful.

neutral

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Channing is not dangerous.

entailment

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Channing is not willing.

entailment

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Blanche is terrible.

self_contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Carl is not large.

neutral

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Channing is cloudy.

contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Chapman is large.

neutral

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Alberto is psychological.

contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Channing is not terrible.

entailment

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Chapman is willing.

neutral

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Roswell is dangerous.

self_contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Blanche is not dangerous.

entailment

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Blanche is not willing.

self_contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Chapman is not cloudy.

neutral

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Roswell is not large.

contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Channing is dangerous.

contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Alberto is large.

entailment

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Alberto is not cloudy.

contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Blanche is willing.

self_contradiction

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Chapman is not terrible.

neutral

Roswell is not terrible. Channing is not dangerous. Blanche is terrible. Alberto is willing. Roswell is not willing. Roland is not psychological. Blanche is willing. Roswell is cloudy. Roland is not cloudy. Blanche is large. Roswell is dangerous. Channing is not cloudy.Someone being both large and not psychological is equivalent to being dangerous and cloudy. If Channing is terrible, then Blanche is not large, and vice versa. If there is someone who is cloudy, then Alberto is large. Roswell being not terrible implies that Roland is not cloudy and Alberto is not psychological. If Roland is not willing and Alberto is terrible, then Channing is not dangerous. Someone is not terrible and not cloudy if and only if he is not willing. Chapman being not cloudy implies that Blanche is not willing and Blanche is not dangerous. If there is someone who is psychological, then Channing is not terrible and Alberto is large. Carl being psychological is equivalent to Roland being not cloudy. Roswell is not dangerous if and only if Blanche is not willing. If someone is not willing, then he is both not terrible and not dangerous. Chapman being terrible implies that Roswell is not psychological and Chapman is not willing.

Roswell is not dangerous.

self_contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Rosie is not wandering.

neutral

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Connell is obedient.

contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Glenn is not consistent.

contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Connell is not consistent.

neutral

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Connell is not cotton.

entailment

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Igor is consistent.

entailment

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Alfie is smiling.

self_contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Glenn is smiling.

self_contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Igor is not obedient.

self_contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Garth is consistent.

contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Glenn is not smiling.

self_contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Deborah is not consistent.

neutral

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Connell is smiling.

entailment

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Deborah is not obedient.

entailment

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Alfie is obedient.

contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Garth is not cotton.

self_contradiction

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Alfie is not consistent.

neutral

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Rosie is smiling.

entailment

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Deborah is consistent.

neutral

Igor is cotton. Deborah is cotton. Igor is smiling. Glenn is consistent. Rosie is consistent. Igor is consistent. Garth is cotton. Garth is not wandering. Alfie is not smiling. Garth is not consistent. Glenn is obedient. Alfie is not cotton.If someone is not obedient, then he is both smiling and wandering. Rosie being smiling is equivalent to Glenn being not obedient and Deborah being wandering. If someone is not cotton, then he is not wandering, and vice versa. If someone is either cotton or not wandering, then he is smiling and not obedient. It can be concluded that Garth is not wandering once knowing that Deborah is obedient. If Glenn is not cotton, then Deborah is not wandering. Someone who is obedient is always both wandering and obedient. All not obedient people are not wandering. If there is someone who is not cotton, then Deborah is not obedient and Connell is not obedient. If Alfie is wandering, then Glenn is not smiling, and vice versa. Someone is consistent and not obedient if and only if he is obedient. Someone who is both obedient and cotton is always wandering.

Igor is not smiling.

contradiction