premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Baird is not serious. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Collier is not serious. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Arthur is blue. | neutral |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Collier is concerned. | entailment |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Quinlan is not blue. | entailment |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | John is not entire. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | John is not blue. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Gabriel is not entire. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | John is concerned. | entailment |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | John is not fresh. | entailment |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Nathalie is accurate. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Gabriel is not blue. | neutral |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Collier is not entire. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Gabriel is entire. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Gabriel is concerned. | entailment |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Gabriel is not serious. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Collier is fresh. | neutral |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Nathalie is concerned. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Nathalie is fresh. | neutral |
Nathalie is not blue.
Gabriel is concerned.
Nathalie is not concerned.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is serious.
Quinlan is not entire.
John is not fresh.
John is blue.
Gabriel is serious.
Arthur is serious.
Gabriel is not entire.
Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire.
Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious.
If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire.
If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate.
If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire.
If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue.
If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue.
If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa.
Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue.
If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue.
If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa. | Arthur is entire. | neutral |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Harris is not excited. | contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jerry is various. | neutral |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jonathan is not disgusted. | contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Harris is timid. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jerry is not excited. | entailment |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jed is not elderly. | neutral |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Harris is not various. | contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Vera is not timid. | neutral |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jerry is excited. | contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Lloyd is not excited. | entailment |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Lloyd is not timid. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jed is not timid. | neutral |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Harris is excited. | entailment |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Harris is elderly. | entailment |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jonathan is not excited. | contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Lloyd is timid. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Jonathan is not various. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Harris is not timid. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Hope is excited. | entailment |
Jerry is not excited.
Lloyd is not excited.
Jed is not courteous.
Harris is various.
Lloyd is not timid.
Hope is various.
Lloyd is not disgusted.
Hope is excited.
Harris is timid.
Harris is not disgusted.
Jonathan is disgusted.
Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly.
Someone being excited is equivalent to being various.
It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various.
If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly.
If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly.
If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various.
Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various.
Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly.
If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various.
Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid. | Vera is various. | neutral |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Herbert is not yellow. | neutral |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Herbert is not sane. | contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Aubrey is rational. | entailment |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Joe is yellow. | contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Luna is not yellow. | self_contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Rick is not yellow. | contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Aubrey is open. | entailment |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Herbert is not unhappy. | contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Luna is rational. | self_contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Luna is not open. | self_contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Hope is troubled. | contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Angus is yellow. | neutral |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Luna is not sane. | self_contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Hope is not yellow. | neutral |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Hope is sane. | entailment |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Luna is not troubled. | entailment |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Luna is not rational. | self_contradiction |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Aubrey is sane. | neutral |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Angus is rational. | neutral |
Rick is yellow.
Luna is not rational.
Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
Herbert is sane.
Joe is sane.
Joe is troubled.
Luna is not troubled.
Herbert is unhappy.
Angus is troubled.
Joe is open.
Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled.
If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational.
Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy.
If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled.
Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open.
If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow.
Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled.
If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled.
Someone who is not troubled is always sane.
Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow.
If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open. | Joe is sane. | entailment |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Abner is breakable. | neutral |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Alfred is not breakable. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Norman is not careful. | entailment |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Pierce is cautious. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Pierce is not cautious. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Norman is careful. | contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Travis is crazy. | neutral |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Kerry is not breakable. | neutral |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Pierce is not breakable. | contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Norman is not difficult. | contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Alfred is not cautious. | contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Pierce is not careful. | entailment |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Kerry is not cautious. | contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Norman is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Alfred is terrible. | entailment |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Kerry is terrible. | neutral |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Travis is not terrible. | entailment |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Abner is careful. | neutral |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Pierce is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not crazy.
Norman is breakable.
Travis is not terrible.
Alfred is terrible.
Norman is crazy.
Norman is difficult.
Pierce is difficult.
Kerry is cautious.
Pierce is not cautious.
Alfred is not breakable.
Travis is not breakable.
Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy.
If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious.
Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult.
If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult.
As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful.
As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable.
If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful.
If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult.
If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful.
If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy.
If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult.
If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful. | Pierce is difficult. | entailment |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Jesse is not big. | contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Colin is not better. | neutral |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Colin is imaginative. | neutral |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Lester is better. | neutral |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Colin is modern. | contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Hunter is not imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Jesse is not modern. | self_contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Harley is blue. | entailment |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Colin is not modern. | entailment |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Rufus is not imaginative. | neutral |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Lester is not imaginative. | neutral |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Claudia is not big. | contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Hunter is not big. | contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Claudia is not blue. | contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Claudia is big. | entailment |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Jesse is modern. | self_contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Hunter is imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Claudia is not better. | entailment |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Jesse is big. | entailment |
Harley is big.
Claudia is blue.
Rufus is not better.
Harley is not modern.
Hunter is impossible.
Harley is blue.
Jesse is not blue.
Hunter is not imaginative.
Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not big.
Colin is not modern.
Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue.
Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern.
Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible.
If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible.
If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big.
If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue.
All big people are not modern.
As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern.
It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible.
If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible.
Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible. | Hunter is modern. | self_contradiction |