Datasets:

pietrolesci

/

wikitoxic

like 1

82be3b6af74a8d19

":Yes and no: for example, if reliable source A calls incident X ""state terror"", and uses argument Y to ""prove it"", then a separate reliable source B that supports argument Y might be used, even if it doesn't directly speak of ""state terror"". Likewise, if reliable source C criticizes argument Y, again with no mention of ""state terror"", they we can also use it. Also, even when there is no controversy per-se, you might want to use sources that provide supporting information, such as proving the existence of organizations or laws. Your perspective, I am afraid is a narrow one. In other words, while the narrative should be around precisely source who do explicitly use the term, there are many instances where sources can, and probably need to, be used that do not explore the concept itself. Lastly, even when the phrase ""state terror"" is not used, but the article is clearly about the topic, it might be included. Rather than a blanket prohibition in the abstract, we should have a discussion on inclusion in the concrete for each instance. "

0non

86caa00668946a9b

" March 2008 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ✉ If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings."

0non

ad6c8778209200be

" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 11:26, 4 April 2014‎ Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. Also, the use of on the last row does not satisfy WP:V. "

0non

5686f19fd5700bae

Whiner!... You try to prevent people from doing their job just because they're trying to remove their own words from a talk page!... That's petty!... I was just doing my job and just because you son of a bitch got insulted you blocked me, huh? Never mind, I never intended to keep talking to you. Well, apparently you don't like to delete things!... Maybe you like to be insulted or ass kicked!...

1tox

ba7609860634a3a5

Conventional wisdom would have it that the country where a vehicle is produced is not an export market, but the lead-in content explains the situation fairly well (from 1999-2010, one could only buy a Mercury in the United States or in the Middle East). In other markets, the car was sold as a Ford. I think it should probably be left alone as is, but if not, the best course to take would be to mention in the timeline when Canadian sale of it as a Mercury (and overall) ended.

0non

fb9caae814bc8b17

Hey, I'll get back to you later today -I'm about to go to work, Thanks, Philip

0non

ed17ba562b2ae04a

Thank you You're all very kind. Keep it up!

0non

740d0072af443d2e

My views IS INCORRECT? Learn grammar, my views are is proper view, no my views are correct, you have special agenda here, because you spend all time doing something here, typing and reverting things, you did not explain anything, i simply corrected few things, added info on time, and you reverted.

0non

1cb19ce1210b457b

" SPAM This user account is being used to continuously edit articles for which no edit is necessary. Furthermore this account is falsely claiming affiliation for the users of the edit he or she claims to have authority over. This account needs to be disabled immediately to reduce the amount of spam on this website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "

0non

ac4a26879f7864d8

SysIQ Page - Edits Hasteur, Thank you for reminders. The page have got some edits and the more will come soon.

0non

87e2e21f232817f3

Placement of Template:Akira Toriyama Hi! Please preview the articles you're editing when inserting Template:Akira Toriyama, as the way you put the template sometimes looked a bit off (for example: ). Also please consider the natural order of the templates; for instance, in the Dragon Quest article, it makes more sense to have the Dragon Quest template before the Akira Toriyama template (). Thanks!

0non

0a99fb2b3b99bd21

OK, I'll watch the page for developments. Maybe I'll see somewhere I can be useful.

0non

96ae4844b5699df1

" From the Incidents Noticeboard Hey RickK, this is in response to your comments at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Maybe you weren't following, but the text of poll 4 that I removed was ""should Everyking be voted off the island at the next tribal council"". That's all I was referring to in my post there on the board. The poll clearly had nothing to do with the related article page and was a clear personal attack. Just to clarify =) 08:09, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)"

0non

22fa80a2e07b4841

Apologize, I don't know how I missed that. I was looking for a fact fast and, well, overlooked that, sorry.

0non

37f1bef33add9ce9

Go fuck yourself you fucking dick go rot in hell piece of crap your mother is a whore

1tox

fc7c94b592f6ed52

" Please re-read my comment. That section is not about GOP or Democratic parties' economic positions or distinctions. That section needs to be a summary of the main articles on the subject. The problem is that editors here are trying to write that section from scratch, including the impossible task of defining the GOP and Democrat parties in one sentence and without context. - (talk) "

0non

f0f7179817ff8641

further harassment from Jance/Jgwlaw Jance is now reverting edits for the sake of reverting my edits.

0non

21b32f0551ec64de

I would make it an initial if I were her as well. Because...the J. stands for James, usually a male name.

0non

50dbde9c5ca47be3

== Boulton Paul Sidestrand/Overstrand Well I looked at the Sidestrand article and didn't see it mentioned, so... Also the Sidestrand seems a little early for such an apparatus; perhaps the turret was intended for the Overstrand instead? - - Fox One! Right you are– although the turret technology was intended for the Sidestrand, it was eventually fitted to the Overstrand. You won't mind if I change the Defiant article subtly to correct the origins of the turret?! 23:08 24 January 2007 (UTC).

0non

13cdedb8e3afdc14

Your a snitch betty leave us alone go mind your own business and stop reporting everyone we don't need people like you telling us what we can or cannot do. I will report you.

1tox

f74ef1f5424c9d9e

Trolling Much? Why did you do this? Are you a troll? 82.171.13.139

0non

eba541fa91e94dc9

Also, unless I am mistaken, are banned... why should this not be brought to an administrator's attention?

0non

ab74e34637da62c9

" RE: CV Sorry, no copyright violation was made. The article was taken from GlobalResearch, which states, ""The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified."" Thanks for research."

0non

d8f9841f88bede76

" To Clarify: I just re-read some of my replies to you BB and in my usual manner i think they may have come across as ""rude"" this was not my intention and i just thought i would say - without trying to sound condescending - imo your questions are well thought out and reasoned. I have not answered your questions about whether I think Otis would have passed peer review for the simple fact that this would be my opinion. As difficult as it maybe to believe, I try to keep to what is cited by others. My personal opinion or background means nothing in WIKI- and this is how it should be ) "

0non

ce8f0ec9b52c32f0

how can i convince you that i am actually sorry?

0non

b9be1533e56811e3

Golden Ratio It is pretty clear to me that whoever wrote the section on Bartok's use of Fibonacci numbers is not a musician. They use the use the terms progression and interval incorrectly. My edit corrected that.

0non

5dc3c37842e4977e

That sounds like it could be easier. Bugs, you said you talked to him a while ago without any luck. Did he seem uninterested, or did it just fizzle out?

0non

4589beb674d77c3a

" You know, 2/0, you're as bad as Verbal and Brangifer are. You are totally biased and unethical. The response that Brangifer gave to that new user sounded almost threatening. There is clearly an attempt to scare off people who don't share your biased ""skeptical"" point of view. The bunch of you are creating a hostile environment on Wikipedia. This isn't what Wikipedia is supposed to be. "

0non

66f7586e2eb44128

" Thank you. I've inserted only text from the published sources. Without contravening Wikipedia's policy of no original research, is there a way to mention strange factual discrepancies in the author's work that haven't been cited in published sources...e.g. 'in his book Broadway Babylon Hadleigh has Madeline Kahn say: ""Nathan Lane has a wonderful sensibility for comedy...It does rather surprise me that as a gay man he participates in that degree of homophobic humor in The Producers. They couldn't have known ahead of time that it would be a hit."" Broadway Babylon, Back Stage Books, 2007 ISBN-10: 0823088308 p289 However, Kahn died in 1999 while Nathan Lane first appeared in The Producers in 2001. Similarly, in his book Leading Ladies, Sir Noel Coward is 'quoted' regarded the 1974 remake of the film Brief Encounter: a remarkable feat given that Coward died in 1973.' This seems a simple listing of dates. "

0non

805df52f86651c0e

There is no proof she is deseased.

0non

98cd5479d832c7fe

I have been wrongfully blocked from editing Hu12‎ and Barek engaged in a deliberate and willful concerted and personal attack on me. They engaged in wikistalking and sock puppetry. When I protested their actions, they deleted my complaints from their talk pages. They deleted (without cause) a whole lot of work I had put into articles. This block is now in retaliation for my complaints. This is an abuse of editorial responsibility, and is part of a larger problem with Hu12, who apparently has issues and abuses his power on a regular basis. You need to put a stop on this abuse of power, position and irresponsibility. I accuse. Stan

0non

38a9c95a0c36a173

Pictures Ilike them did you take them? user: fartgo/talk

0non

848b305352fd5ce2

Polish Marines There were some references to 7th Coastal Defense Brigade as the Polish marines. Unfortunately, this is not true. After disbanding the 7th Coastal Defense Division in 1989 and scrapping most of landing ships, there is no amphibious assault unit in the Polish Army. The 7th Coastal Defense Brigade only bears traditions of the 7th Division, and it practices small-scale experimental exercises with amphibious assault, but it's still not amphibious assault unit. At least up to 2007, there was no decision of creating a real amphibious assault unit in the Polish Army. ←«

0non

948849967a23742d

The sources are in the main works, you sorry sleaze. Don't edit my post again.

0non

596c2c9f984651bd

November 2009 {subst:test1|Iraq national football team}} -

0non

27fd0c229cedcae1

" Checkuser is very untrustworthy from what I hear, and there have been allegedly a lot of ""confirmed matches"" for the users involved with this case. I am certain that either someone is stretching the results to label us as the same or that the admin who did the Checkuser is lying. Proof of this is the fact that I know I am not anyone other than myself. And there's no one else here who could be. Also, that statement is contradictory to what has been said in the past. According to the admins in charge of the previous Checkusers, all nineteen of those accounts allegedly had the same IP, which is why they were banned as duplicate accounts. The above statement reveals that as a lie. "

0non

3bc75e5f06e61075

"relative to ""one-way mirror"" "

0non

89dfd5e48c50f608

very aware of a good or deadhorse article at its earliest stage

0non

1d6951911fed7294

There's a huge section clearly all over it at the bottom. Don't worry, if you're trying to get people to dislike him for that, I'm sure they won't miss that entire section. LOL, K, it's obvious you

0non

977dfe0471625833

Why was my Thrust1 edit reverted? I removed Category:Thrust project as it didn't exist, and moved the article from Category:Jet land speed record cars to Category:Jet cars, as Thrust1 was not itself a land speed record car (despite being constructed as part of the Thrust project to break the land speed record). Instead it was a low-speed test vehicle built to allow the team to gain experience in driving a jet-propelled vehicle.

0non

9f8afd72ff0b257d

Cleanup 2008 Is the letter att he bottom really necessary for this article? It looks like a text dump from somewhere, lacks any breaks and is hard to read. While it might be relevent, a link to it would be better. Having it here is not encyclopaedic. 205.157.110.11

0non

cb6f4520b1592592

" Yes, I noticed, the text, mostly in the section ""Lennox Crisis"" is a summary of this article, Macauley, Sarah. 'The Lennox Crisis', 1558-1563.', Northern History 41.2 (2004). I can't tell if this text a good summary of that article, or if that article is useful from this summary. "

0non

f5de0e466ebc31c6

The mute was created for the jaguar.

0non

22c6333a7afdbfea

Everyone logged into an account is allowed to vote in RfAs. Please note that I have removed your strikeout of a 'permabanned troll' in Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Consumed_Crustacean because, according to policy, everyone logged into an account is allowed to vote for RfAs, unless there is reason to suspect.

0non

fcb63963a46e02dd

, not the motorcycle, not their enthusiasm

0non

fd90a635befc52c9

" Your an absolute plonker. WP:Footy has nothing to do with redlinks not a thing. Scot "

0non

acd8defe8deca1c0

Sox-Do you have formal training on corporate law or are you just being a dick. Seems like you're pretty much the latter based on these other posts.

1tox

67c342f9ff8c9e3a

Reverting a link with spam is a double standard and makes you a hipocrite.

1tox

9569fd906c7f5a44

I KNOW that I have seen this on the Internet somewhere. Instead of demolition derby or monster truck show, somewhere out in the mid-West, some sub-genre of this form of entertainment involves taking big-assed engines, standalone, max out on the cable that corresponds to the acceleration and just do it for the minute or two it takes for the engine to blow. The rural crowd interest in this sub-genre loves it! They assign points and prizes for artistry everying. Only in America!

0non

8323e699401143f9

My name is Pinkadelica, a charming Texas girl, 22 years old. I am independent young escort based in Houston. I am joyful but discreet person, intelligent and sensual. I am extremely feminine with perfect curves and the charm to please a gentleman. I will. Pinkadelica

0non

9b3b6670c51a7e6c

I am happy for the risk of dependence dose to remain in - that article also needs a section on serotonergic issues with SSRIs etc. (talk · contribs)

0non

7a0d2addaf87024a

" Content opponent? No, see this. Just a liar and hate-monger. "

1tox

ccbfb3fdf926bba5

Thank you, Giano! I just needed someone to be so kind and reasonable!

0non

55a99a53861c67b6

Wikiquote I have created a page about the game on Wikiquote. See here: [en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Age of Empires III]. The problem is, this article is a bit too short. Feel free to add anything to the article. 58.168.147.119

0non

37c98cd3ea0a90ad

21:02, 22 August 2007 Akhristov (Talk | contribs) (4,672 bytes) (sock) (undo)

0non

5f5be793d50e0524

" We deleted your comments because you were vandalizing the talk page. If you wish to have a discussion, do so with a certain amount of tact; I will not consider a reasonable comment as a comment that refers to people as ""faggots"". In response, there is no exaggeration to the importance of this leisure activity. Video games account for a considerable chunk of the Japanese economy. The fact of the matter is that delays of major video game software or hardware would not only harm the local Japanese economy more than it already has been, but lasting damage of the video game industry could harm the worldwide economy. And what you ignore is that the video games industry is considered one of the most influential industries for the world economy, and that Japan is a major component of said industry. We are willing to have a reasonable discussion on the notability, if you are able to discuss it without describing people as faggots and weeaboos in every comment. And as an addition, I play games regardless of region, and regardless of the Japanese style. The reason that such an article was made is because it's the first disaster has caused such significant damage or effect on such a large component of the industry because of how small Japan is relative to how large the quake was. - used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. "

0non

08de162b76e6f3d6

" Leaving messages for other users Hello TheEuphoricSir, welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you left what looked like a ""thank you"" message on the page (Did I mess up?) "

0non

c9c49890f5239b2f

KMT may not be pro-communist, I agree. I, however, contend that they are communist-leaning. There are many KMT here who believe that to merge back with China would be to give up democracy and fall back under communist rule. While there are clearly benefits to this, such as access to weapons, there are also potential problems such as receiving false, governemnt sanctioned news, etc.

0non

3719ff00b66a1a30

Tide Rolls you are unbelievable. I,not you, have called for discussion. Once again, this discussion is meant to last a few days. Then, not now, a decision will be made.

0non

7105103dd3846ac3

For the record: barricade is in the third movie. so he survived. you might want to check your resources before posting information.

0non

25a16c2f9b3c2fd4

" That's true, and I appreciate it, but I still wish you had disclosed to Damon "

0non

3bf71621de5d3f87

Also spammed Issaquah, Washington, Bellevue, Washington and White Center, Washington

0non

9f10912e760dca47

Admit it Doc, you are a subsalicylate schill. (resonate)

1tox

7d807f71c5d1fecd

" Dr. Judy Wood Notability == Isn't this a notable secondary source though? Dr. Wood was invited to present her research on the very popular radio show, 'We Ourselves', hosted by Ambrose Lane. The radio station is WPFW 89.3 - Washington, D.C. The interview is all over the internet, but a direct link to it is here: http://www.weourselves.org/wpfw/052308.html Please let me know. Thank you. As I pointed out on someone else's talk page, where you spammed this request: It's not clear it's a notable talk show, and It's not at all clear the show has a reputation for fact-checking. Without both, it's only a reliable primary source for what Dr. Wood actually said, if that. — (talk) It's not hard to fact-check the fact that Dr. Wood's case went all the way to the Supreme Court. That has nothing to do with it, nor is it notable. Anyone can appeal their case to the Supreme Court (technically, request Supreme Court review, as an actual appeal to the Supreme Court can only be done on certain Constitutionally specified cases). The Court let the Appealate Court decision (that there was no case) stand, with no dissenting justices. — (talk) Yes, anyone can try to appeal their case, but not all cases get appealed, in fact, very few cases get appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, because the Supreme Court only takes on the biggest and most important cases. In this scenario, her case was so solid and so backed by evidence, that it made it ALL THE WAY to the SUPREME COURT. To say that the only 9/11 research efforts ever to be filed in a court of law and make it to the Supreme Court are not notable, makes me question your integrity as a person. Amazing. Ahem. The Supreme Court did not ""take the case"". In fact, the Appealate Court ruled there was no potential case, and the Supreme Court did not hear the ""appeal"". — (talk) There was a motion to dismiss by the defendents at the level of Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court upheld that motion. The case was dismissed at the level of the Supreme Court, regardless of whether or not the case was actually heard. (cite)?. My recollection is that Appealate court accepted the motion to dismiss (or, possibly, rejected Federal jurisdiction against the defendants). If there was a Supreme Court order, I'd like to see a pointer to it. — (talk) =="

0non

93938de853b1bde4

Your diffs seem to be echoing the fact that Atabek was restricted under the first ARBAA case. Can you find a link showing that an admin placed any further restriction on him? If there was one, it ought to be in his talk page history. Thanks,

0non

276c4e2513b023c6

. States have ratified or acceded to the Covenant (as at April 1999): Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Cote d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan. Also Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

0non

ccb27a6c7a1a699e

Got rid of !@#$% verification tags To satisfy a certain editor who insisted on scattering useless tags all over the article challenging obvious facts I already showed him before, I've supplied references. Sheesh, and I don't get any thanks for the work I do.

0non

99d15bb3aac18692

" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): you are just a great guy, I don't even know why you were blocked in the first place, I love you. Request handled by: "

0non

4d2f703df3092bf5

" Hey, no one's paying you for this. You take it as slow as you want. -0) podous "

0non

221eff8b79efab50

Anyone who does not believe in the Word of Jonathan Christ needs to examine the meaning and purpose of their life. And, to be fair to the naysayers, I think you are taking this far too seriously. Amen.

0non

5053dbe3126d55fa

" Minnesota Entertainment section The section, and the article in general, is starting to attract those who wish to mention their favorite groups or music festivals. It seems to me that only those artists of truly national stature whose work has stood the test of time should be mentioned Andrews Sisters, Dylan, probably Prince, and a few others. I would lose the recent additions and maybe a few others, especially given the subsidiary article on Music of Minnesota. But as you seem to be more ""in tune"" (sorry about that) with the music scene, maybe you could look at the new additions and decide what should stay and what should go. Thanks. "

0non

0b71648b37127571

Material 2 I found much material about Christopher Columbus - may be helpful - 1. http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1033.html 2. http://www.biography.com/articles/christopher-columbus-9254209 3. http://history.howstuffworks.com/north-american-history/christopher-columbus.htm 4. http://www.questia.com/library/encyclopedia/columbus_christopher.jsp 5. http://www.lycos.com/info/christopher-columbuscentral-america.html

0non

1c28bc56a128f70e

t recognize types VIII, IX and XII. I still don't understand why Pearson thought Eq. 1 was the right way to derive probability distributions There seems to be an error in the derivation of type IV. If b2 > 3 (as indicated by the figure, and from the negative sign of the discriminant), how can m = 1/2*b2 > 0.5?

0non

65f2f9f66101ba2f

, 6 September 2009 (UTC) And I didn't mean to say that you said the Romans named them; I was glad that you might correct a misconception represented online. But once I noticed the discussion (you'll have to forgive me for barging in; I'm frequently on Haploidavey's page), I did become intrigued by when the animals got the name, because it seems an imaginative and self-conscious piece of naming, and I'm interested in the ways scientists and naturalists used their classical educations in the 1500s–1900s. 05:41

0non

b8a0b2839a281e76

//JFAC is deathcore. After seeing all these deathcore bands, and the fact that meshuggah is on here, finally does point me to how unreliable wikipedia is.// No, not for a while have they been Deathcore. 68.32.114.10

0non

f1ae2bbb7de2b671

in the Asia Times Forum

0non

d96b1e6b3fa0b4fb

A deeply revision of herrerasaurs and non-averostran theropods I'll work on their articles and i will be based on the paper of Tawa hallae Please, dont delete my modifications )

0non

1efc70c3998ca9a6

I disagree vehemently. First denialism was only about those who had something personal to gain. Now it is only about people trying to engage in political lobbying. Wow...very effective argument...NOT. And the evidence from assorted publications is at odds with your interpretations. Any gratuitous assertion can be gratuitously refuted by the laws of logic. And I do so. With extreme prejudice. Since I have some evidence on my side (see below). The flat earth society does not deny facts, in your opinion? Or does not explain them away in a contrived and nonparsimonious fashion? The way that Holocaust deniers and AIDS denialists do? Wow that is some statement for someone who supposedly has your background. And NO that is not a personal attack. But that is quite a position to take. Let's go to a debate with our positions. Or into depositions. And see how it goes.

0non

a45b4e2b323de53a

Link in UNESCO Hi Alessandro57, Why did you remove the edition that I created in UNESCO page? Please, don't misunderstand my question, I only want to know the reasons and learn about it. Thanks

0non

dd51dc140985201c

Category:Soviet spies Category:Venona Appendix A

0non

0c9eef1291980b06

Do you know someone who is? I can't just let the anti-EDers try to keep this clearly sourcable site deleted.

0non

d12ca7d9f07b9154

Well contrary to the above, I'd say good job Technocrate. You've managed to revert Skip's edits quite quickly, takes a bit of stress off me. Although you should probably be a bit more careful in editing and you should always give a reason for reversions in the edit summary, even though it may seem pointless as it's already been talked about endlessly. You should also try to get involved in the discussion page rather than being a bystander.

0non

8c48ec0e97a09093

I undid your revision, if that's alright.

0non

f16193d120a02251

Please stop your vandalism!

0non

10eb39f1c0f3a8d0

July 2012 (UTC) In the case of Poland, there were censuse both before and after the War, and religious affiliation was assigned at birth, and very hard to subsequently change [birth registration was in the hands of religious bodies]. In any event, the sheer number of eye-witnesses to what went on, Home Army {resistance] intelligence reports, and the testimonies of Jewish, Polish and other collaborators as well as Germans in post-war trials, along with thorough German documentary evidence, made the sad task easier. One only had to look around to see absence evereywhere, seems to be the survivors common testimony. 86.12.129.2 11:22, 15

0non

c5890a8c4fa798a8

United Kingdom Location A British company based in a United Kingdom is always based in the UK. The UK is the internationally recognised name of this country, not Scotland, England Wales nor Northern Ireland nor even Great Britain. I have no problem with any of the four regions being stated, but the UK must also be listed, as the UK is the official, legal and sovereign country name, like it or not. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and therefore must state accurate facts, not people's own personal preferences. In my humble opinion, this is a non-argument and the United Kingdom should take precedence.

0non

52602b5ae5b527b5

This text was removed, as it does not belong in the main text, but rather in Talk about this topic: Note: a enumeration of the types of chemical reactions is neededEdited by D.C. We're going to have problems with some editors, because it seems they have no practical experience with what real chemists, in real usage, call a chemical synthesis. This corruption of use, which started in the chemical synthesis article, seems to be migrating to this article as well, and it will be stopped ). The next point is that this article should not be ended with a brainless enumeration of kinds of chemical reactions, but it could be well served by a series of links to Wikipedia articles on types of chemical reactions, articles which already exist within the Wikipedia. For example there already are articles on hydrolysis and one on the hydration reaction. Other articles on chemical reactions are embedded in the article on the compound itself (e.g. soap and saponification). 23:05, 10 Nov 2003 (UTC)

0non

248afb11a1598a4d

DYK for job attitude DYK for job attitude Greetings I was wondering if you can look over the nomination for Job attitude. This nomination was pending before the request for other articles. So I was wondering if you can glance it. All of the other admins in the page are OK with the article. They cant recommend it because they fixed stuff to it. All of the errors are fixed and there is no copyediting at all. The request for this article has already been posted on the WT:DYK however people are not taking action. My class is ending for the APS project and this being in the DYK can really help out alot of things on my campus.

0non

ad8aaf0ef5024efd

" MovieFan Contribs I deleted the edits by User MovieFan because most of them were inaccurate in light of the latest research. For example: Peg Entwsitle was never in ""bit parts"" or a ""handful of films."" Extensive research for her biography, which included weeks of reviewing original RKO office memos, contracts, and payroll records concerning Entwistle, support her having a role in just one film. Moreover, the claim regarding Entwistle's Los Angeles play ""The Mad Hopes"" in the newspaper item sourced by MovieFan is completely spurious. Contrary to this source, the play, a pre-Broadway tryout, was a rousing success in San Diego and Los Angeles during its several-weeks' run. My research discovered many reviews and theatrical periodicals containg nothing but praise for the play and players. The MovieFan source contained, ""but nothing came of it,"" in regard to a context insinuating that Peg hadn't got the part. In fact, the premiere of this play at the Belasco was a Red Carpet event on the scale of a Hollywood film premiere! The contribs by MovieFan with regard the divorce of Entwistle and Robert Keith are only partly accurate, taken from news accounts whereas the official and complete court testimony by Peg Entwistlewhich I have in my posessiondoes not entirely reflect MovieFan's edit. The ""hair pulling"" account is in fact reflected in the official court document, but does this information actually improve the Wiki? There is more I can discuss, however, I wish to make it clear that I do not want to discourage MovieFan, or anyone else, from contributing to Peg Entwistle's Wiki. God knows the wars that have been waged in the past regarding it! But I simply found it easier to Undo the MovieFan contribs in their entirety in the hopes that MovieFan, or anyone else, would discuss the content. Honestly, while I'm very pleased that Peg Entwistle has so many fans, I think her Wiki should be left as is. Using the old sources, such as tabloids and newspapers is a tricky affair with many red herrings. It's best, I believe, to leave the Entwistle page alone. "

0non

3e8853d79d4b0c83

Answer It is just an error.It was Ural-375,Ural-377,Ural-375 D,Ural 4320 but never was an Ural-357 D.

0non

36b761ca8213dc61

You are wrong my friend. As anyone can see the first and the second as well as the third edit were not the same. I put new information, because you are the one who keeps deleting sourced parts. So I ask admin to block you, for nationalistic actions, removing international sources (ICTY judgement) in order to minimize genocide commited by Serbs in Srebrenica. Obviously you are afraid to talk about the truth so you are going around to report me for 3RR, which I btw did not break. Also I would like admins to see the whole discussion here: . Regards.

0non

e49839b57384d2db

" In the same way the ""jesus"" article should only discuss ""jesus"" and the verifiable evidence about him not all the ""christian"" propaganda that it current;y also includes and the unverifiable, unhistorical and inaccurate? "

0non

78c8f5c3b05a4ff6

Several exting quaternary volcanoes are situated in the surroundings of the town Bruntál. Most of them belong to the group of mixed volcanoes, which means that the activity of the volcanoes was in turns explosive and extrusive. Lava was vomited during the surface in the shape of incoherent volvano eruptive rock. On the contrary by the extrusion lava was running out from the crater and formed the lava streams. The volcano eruptive rocks form mostly the volcano maar. Velký Roudný / Big Roudný 780 m above sea and Malý Roudný / Small Roudný 771 m above sea Velký Roudný (Big Roudný) is the highest volcano of the Low Jeseníky Mountains. This volcano was last active 1 – 2 milion years ago. Big a Small Roudný form two remarkable peaks above the village Roudno. From three lava streams of Big Roudný the northeaster one is the longest and the quarry for whinstone mining was made here. This lava stream dammed up the valley of the river Moravice in the place of todays Slezska Harta, so a great lake was formed. To which the eruptive rocks were falling. They created sediments of sponge puff-stones, which are today found in the surroundings of the villages Razová and Karlovec. These puff-stones were mined as a good building material. TABThe Bruntál volcanoes create a remarkable and striking feature of the Low Jeseniky Mountains countryside. Trip to Big Roudný TABThe easier way to Big Roudný is from the going to Křištanovice. We will go along the guidepost from the upper crossing in Roudno. We are on the top in half an hour, where a big information board is placed and next to it there is a cone hollow, which is considered to be the rest of the crater. A rebuilt small chapel is placed on the top. Behind the chapel there are 15 pictures of the Station of the Cross on the stands. If we go downhill, we come to two stony mounds with a cross – to the victims of the 1st Word War in 1914 – 1918. More ambitous tourists can go down from the mound maybe 30m downhill to a visible road which goes out from the forest and go on along a meadow path at first to the southern direction and then turn down the way to the road to Bílčice.

0non

72c090d3c1452eff

that sort of statement coming from you Sjo !!??? Hahahahah... In that case I'll take it as a compliment. Arrogance beyond belief!

0non

f95d93a0190b7f9c

" Regarding the protection of “NawlinWiki's anus"" Hello, could you please unprotect that page? I would like to create an article there. Thank you."

0non

c1e680a70b0d00bc

I should like an admin other than the one who blocked me to review this reason. Thank you.}}

0non

d30189fce94e36c5

" Yes, you have time to edit-war and restore the article to promotional version but not to edit to correct it. When corrected by some other editor, you claim it not to be perfect and do revert repeatedly. I see no good in promotional and unsourced tone and contents based purely on primary source. Edit-warring? Did I make any edit without leaving an edit summary? It is you, despite discussing the concerns on here, you went on to make revert multiple times. I'm very much disappointed to see apparently an established editor behaving, yes, much likely to a WP:NOTHERE editor. It is you, who chooses to revert instead discussing the changes. You came here to leave a comment only after making a revert. Did you notice it? You choose to post a warning template on my talk page, instead initiating a discussion on article's talk page. You should post a edit-warring template yourself on your talk page, being honest seeing the page history. And, If I really am edit-warring, then I dare you to make a case at ANEW/ANI. You did not answer one previous question. Have you some 'conflict of interest' with the subject? And, the headline of the discussion is very much appropriate. You see good in 'promotional contents either unsourced or dependent of primary sources', and claim it to be encyclopedic. Is it really what you understand of encyclopedic contents? In my edit, the article has less contents, but at least it is encyclopedic, what Wikipedia is all about (see, WP:ENC). I do not care for contents, I care of standard. And, that's what I did when removed promtional, unsourced and duly based on primary source contents and you did re-instate the same multiple times (4 times, am I required to cite diff. links?) You say, ""[..]An article must inevitably describe its subject. It is the purpose of an article[..]"", NO, information present in Wikipedia articles should be based on secondary, independent and reliable sources and the same should be written in a neutral tone. Wikipedia does not accept original research. Maintenance tags are not an excuse to put in unsourced, promotional tone into any Wikipedia article. Do you understand it? I may expand more, if you want me to. -Let's talk! "

0non

fc83476d63e464d8

It should be changed. Blotto Adrift loves to change articles that he is in conflict with. Blotto it's time to follow policy. Admin's beware of him.

0non

132d30099d28bda5

" thank you 157.130.162.178 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Spread the goodness of cookies by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. thank you for talking and not just giving me a auotmated response or deleting me ur the first one who did that and thats y im giving you this cookie"

0non

b67a598d0edf533c

Re: Edit summary Thanks for the barnstar, dude. Was just doing my job, although I had to admit that I was venting over who has been uploading copyrighted images of people despite warnings from peeps not to do so.

0non