Datasets:

mrnetx

/

new_cve

like 0

CVE-1999-0503

Candidate

A Windows NT local user or administrator account has a guessable password.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0503

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> Note: I am assuming that this entry includes Windows 2000 accounts and | machine/service accounts listed in User Manager. | XF:nt-guess-admin | XF:nt-guess-user | XF:nt-guess-guest | XF:nt-guessed-operpwd | XF:nt-guessed-powerwd | XF:nt-guessed-disabled | XF:nt-guessed-backup | XF:nt-guessed-acctoper-pwd | XF:nt-adminuserpw | XF:nt-guestuserpw | XF:nt-accountuserpw | XF:nt-operator-userpw | XF:nt-service-user-pwd | XF:nt-server-oper-user-pwd | XF:nt-power-user-pwd | XF:nt-backup-operator-userpwd | XF:nt-disabled-account-userpwd | Christey> This candidate is affected by the CD:CF-PASS content decision, | which determines the appropriate level of abstraction to | use for password problems. CD:CF-PASS needs to be accepted | by the Editorial Board before this candidate can be | converted into a CVE entry; the final version of CD:CF-PASS | may require using a different LOA than this candidate is | currently using.

CVE-1999-0504

Candidate

A Windows NT local user or administrator account has a default, null, blank, or missing password.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0504

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> XF:nt-guestblankpw | XF:nt-adminblankpw | XF:nt-adminnopw | XF:nt-usernopw | XF:nt-guestnopw | XF:nt-accountblankpw | XF:nt-nopw | XF:nt-operator-blankpwd | XF:nt-server-oper-blank-pwd | XF:nt-power-user-blankpwd | XF:nt-backup-operator-blankpwd | XF:nt-disabled-account-blankpwd | Christey> This candidate is affected by the CD:CF-PASS content decision, | which determines the appropriate level of abstraction to | use for password problems. CD:CF-PASS needs to be accepted | by the Editorial Board before this candidate can be | converted into a CVE entry; the final version of CD:CF-PASS | may require using a different LOA than this candidate is | currently using.

CVE-1999-0505

Candidate

A Windows NT domain user or administrator account has a guessable password.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0505

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> XF:nt-guessed-domain-userpwd | XF:nt-guessed-domain-guestpwd | XF:nt-guessed-domain-adminpwd | XF:nt-domain-userpwd | XF:nt-domain-admin-userpwd | XF:nt-domain-guest-userpwd | XF:win2k-certpub-usrpwd | XF:win2k-dhcpadm-usrpwd | XF:win2k-dnsadm-usrpwd | XF:win2k-entadm-usrpwd | XF:win2k-schema-usrpwd | XF:win2k-guessed-certpub | XF:win2k-guessed-dhcpadm | XF:win2k-guessed-dnsadm | XF:win2k-guessed-entadm | XF:win2k-guessed-schema

CVE-1999-0506

Candidate

A Windows NT domain user or administrator account has a default, null, blank, or missing password.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0506

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> XF:nt-domain-admin-blankpwd | XF:nt-domain-admin-nopwd | XF:nt-domain-guest-blankpwd | XF:nt-domain-guest-nopwd | XF:nt-domain-user-blankpwd | XF:nt-domain-user-nopwd | XF:win2k-certpub-blnkpwd | XF:win2k-dhcpadm-blnkpwd | XF:win2k-dnsadm-blnkpwd | XF:win2k-entadm-blnkpwd | XF:win2k-schema-blnkpwd

CVE-1999-0507

Candidate

An account on a router, firewall, or other network device has a guessable password.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0507

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> XF:firewall-tisopen | XF:firewall-raptoropen | XF:firewall-msopen | XF:firewall-checkpointopen | XF:firewall-ciscoopen

CVE-1999-0508

Candidate

An account on a router, firewall, or other network device has a default, null, blank, or missing password.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0508

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Christey

Frech> Note: Because the distinction between network hardware and software is not | distinct, | the term 'network device' was liberally interpreted. Feel free to reject any | of the | below terms. | XF:default-netranger | XF:cayman-gatorbox | XF:breezecom-default-passwords | XF:default-portmaster | XF:wingate-unpassworded | XF:netopia-unpassworded | XF:default-bay-switches | XF:motorola-cable-default-pass | XF:default-flowpoint | XF:qms-2060-no-root-password | XF:avirt-ras-password | XF:webtrends-rtp-serv-install-password | XF:cisco-bruteforce | XF:cisco-bruteadmin | XF:sambar-server-defaults | XF:management-pfcuser | XF:http-cgi-wwwboard-default | Christey> DELREF XF:avirt-ras-password - does not fit CVE-1999-0508.

CVE-1999-0509

Candidate

Perl, sh, csh, or other shell interpreters are installed in the cgi-bin directory on a WWW site, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.

CERT:CA-96.11 | MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/146

Modified (20000114)

ACCEPT(2) Northcutt, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Christey> What is the right level of abstraction to use here? Should | we combine all possible interpreters into a single entry, | or have a different entry for each one? I've often seen | Perl separated from other interpreters - is it included | by default in some Windows web server configurations? | Christey> Add tcsh, zsh, bash, rksh, ksh, ash, to support search. | Frech> XF:http-cgi-vuln(146)

CVE-1999-0510

Candidate

A router or firewall allows source routed packets from arbitrary hosts.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0510

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> XF:source-routing

CVE-1999-0511

Candidate

IP forwarding is enabled on a machine which is not a router or firewall.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0511

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> XF:ip-forwarding

CVE-1999-0512

Candidate

A mail server is explicitly configured to allow SMTP mail relay, which allows abuse by spammers.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0512

Modified (20020427)

ACCEPT(3) Baker, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Christey

Frech> XF:smtp-sendmail-relay(210) | XF:ntmail-relay(2257) | XF:exchange-relay(3107) (also assigned to CVE-1999-0682) | XF:smtp-relay-uucp(3470) | XF:sco-sendmail-spam(4342) | XF:sco-openserver-mmdf-spam(4343) | XF:lotus-domino-smtp-mail-relay(6591) | XF:win2k-smtp-mail-relay(6803) | XF:cobalt-poprelayd-mail-relay(6806) | | Candidate implicitly may refer to relaying settings enabled by default, or | the bypass/circumvention of relaying. Both interpretations were used in | assigning this candidate. | Christey> The intention of this candidate is to cover configurations in | which the admin has explicitly enabled relaying. Other cases | in which the application *intends* to prvent relaying, but | there is some specific input that bypasses/tricks it, count | as vulnerabilities (or exposures?) and as such would be | assigned different numbers. | | http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/spam.html seems like a good | general resource, as does ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2505.txt | Christey> I changed the description to make it more clear that the issue | is that of explicit configuration, as opposed to being the | result of a vulnerability.

CVE-1999-0513

Entry

ICMP messages to broadcast addresses are allowed, allowing for a Smurf attack that can cause a denial of service.

CERT:CA-98.01.smurf | FREEBSD:FreeBSD-SA-98:06 | MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0513 | XF:smurf

CVE-1999-0514

Entry

UDP messages to broadcast addresses are allowed, allowing for a Fraggle attack that can cause a denial of service by flooding the target.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0514 | XF:fraggle

CVE-1999-0515

Candidate

An unrestricted remote trust relationship for Unix systems has been set up, e.g. by using a + sign in /etc/hosts.equiv.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0515

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Frech | REJECT(1) Shostack

Shostack> Overly broad | Frech> XF:rsh-equiv(111) | Baker> Since this is unrestricted trust, I agree this is a problem

CVE-1999-0516

Candidate

An SNMP community name is guessable.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0516

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> XF:snmp-get-guess | XF:snmp-set-guess | XF:sol-hidden-commstr | XF:hpov-hidden-snmp-comm | Christey> This candidate is affected by the CD:CF-PASS content decision, | which determines the appropriate level of abstraction to | use for password problems. CD:CF-PASS needs to be accepted | by the Editorial Board before this candidate can be | converted into a CVE entry; the final version of CD:CF-PASS | may require using a different LOA than this candidate is | currently using.

CVE-1999-0517

Candidate

An SNMP community name is the default (e.g. public), null, or missing.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0517

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> XF:nt-snmp | XF:snmp-comm | XF:snmp-set-any | XF:snmp-get-public | XF:snmp-set-public | XF:snmp-get-any | Christey> This candidate is affected by the CD:CF-PASS content decision, | which determines the appropriate level of abstraction to | use for password problems. CD:CF-PASS needs to be accepted | by the Editorial Board before this candidate can be | converted into a CVE entry; the final version of CD:CF-PASS | may require using a different LOA than this candidate is | currently using. | Christey> Consider adding BID:2112

CVE-1999-0518

Candidate

A NETBIOS/SMB share password is guessable.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0518

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(5) Baker, LeBlanc, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> Change description term to NetBIOS. | XF:nt-netbios-perm | XF:sharepass | XF:win95-smb-password | XF:nt-netbios-dict

CVE-1999-0519

Candidate

A NETBIOS/SMB share password is the default, null, or missing.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0519

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(5) Baker, LeBlanc, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> Change description term to NetBIOS. | XF:decod-smb-password-empty | XF:nt-netbios-everyoneaccess | XF:nt-netbios-guestaccess | XF:nt-netbios-allaccess | XF:nt-netbios-open | XF:nt-netbios-write | XF:nt-netbios-shareguest | XF:nt-writable-netbios | XF:nt-netbios-everyoneaccess-printer | XF:nt-netbios-share-print-guest

CVE-1999-0520

Candidate

A system-critical NETBIOS/SMB share has inappropriate access control.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/3

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Northcutt | REJECT(1) LeBlanc | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Northcutt> I think we need to enumerate the shares and or the access control | Christey> One question is, what is "inappropriate"? It's probably | very dependent on the policy of the enterprise on which | this is found. And should writable shares be different | from readable shares? (Or file systems, mail spools, etc.) | Yes, the impact may be different, but we could have a | large number of entries for each possible type of access. | A content decision (CD:CF-DATA) needs to be reviewed | and accepted by the Editorial Board in order to resolve | this question. | LeBlanc> Unacceptably vague - agree with Christey's comments. | Frech> associated to: | XF:nt-netbios-everyoneaccess(1) | XF:nt-netbios-guestaccess(2) | XF:nt-netbios-allaccess(3) | XF:nt-netbios-open(15) | XF:nt-netbios-write(19) | XF:nt-netbios-shareguest(20) | XF:nt-writable-netbios(26) | XF:nb-rootshare(393) | XF:decod-smb-password-empty(2358)

CVE-1999-0521

Candidate

An NIS domain name is easily guessable.

MISC:http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1992-13.html

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Christey

Frech> XF:nis-dom | Christey> Consider http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1992-13.html | as well as ftp://ciac.llnl.gov/pub/ciac/bulletin/c-fy92/c-25.ciac-sunos-nis-patch

CVE-1999-0522

Candidate

The permissions for a system-critical NIS+ table (e.g. passwd) are inappropriate.

CERT:CA-96.10 | MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0522

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | NOOP(1) Christey | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> Why not say world readable, this is what you do further down in the | file (world exportable in CVE-1999-0554) | Christey> ADDREF AUSCERT:AA-96.02

CVE-1999-0523

Candidate

ICMP echo (ping) is allowed from arbitrary hosts.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0523

Proposed (19990726)

MODIFY(1) Meunier | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(2) Frech, Northcutt

Northcutt> (Though I sympathize with this one :) | CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to REJECT] | Frech> Ping is a utility that can be run on demand; ICMP echo is a | message | type. As currently worded, this candidate seems as if an arbitrary | host | is vulnerable because it is capable of running an arbitrary program | or | function (in this case, ping/ICMP echo). There are many | programs/functions that | 'shouldn't' be on a computer, from a security admin's perspective. | Even if this | were a vulnerability, it would be impacted by CD-HIGHCARD. | Meunier> Every ICMP message type presents a vulnerability or an | exposure, if access is not controlled. By that I mean not only those | in RFC 792, but also those in RFC 1256, 950, and more. I think that | the description should be changed to "ICMP messages are acted upon | without any access control". ICMP is an error and debugging protocol. | We complain about vendors leaving testing backdoors in their programs. | ICMP is the equivalent for TCP/IP. ICMP should be in the dog house, | unless you are trying to troubleshoot something. MTU discovery is | just a performance tweak -- it's not necessary. I don't know of any | ICMP message type that is necessary if the network is functional. | Limited logging of ICMP messages could be useful, but acting upon them | and allowing the modification of routing tables, the behavior of the | TCP/IP stack, etc... without any form of authentication is just crazy.

CVE-1999-0524

Candidate

ICMP information such as (1) netmask and (2) timestamp is allowed from arbitrary hosts.

CONFIRM:http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 | CONFIRM:https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10053 | MISC:http://descriptions.securescout.com/tc/11010 | MISC:http://descriptions.securescout.com/tc/11011 | MISC:http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&externalId=1434 | OSVDB:95 | URL:http://www.osvdb.org/95 | XF:icmp-netmask(306) | URL:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/306 | XF:icmp-timestamp(322) | URL:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/322

Modified (20161206)

MODIFY(3) Baker, Frech, Meunier | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Frech> XF:icmp-timestamp | XF:icmp-netmask | Meunier> If this is not merged with 1999-0523 as I commented for that | CVE, then the description should be changed to "ICMP messages of types | 13 and 14 (timestamp request and reply) and 17 and 18 (netmask request | and reply) are acted upon without any access control". It's a more | precise and correct language. I believe that this is a valid CVE | entry (it's a common source of vulnerabilities or exposures) even | though I see that the inferred action was "reject". Knowing the time | of a host also allows attacks against random number generators that | are seeded with the current time. I want to push to have it accepted. | Baker> I agree with the description changes suggested by Pascal

CVE-1999-0525

Candidate

IP traceroute is allowed from arbitrary hosts.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0525

Proposed (19990726)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Frech> XF:traceroute

CVE-1999-0526

Entry

An X server's access control is disabled (e.g. through an "xhost +" command) and allows anyone to connect to the server.

CERT-VN:VU#704969 | URL:http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/704969 | XF:xcheck-keystroke

CVE-1999-0527

Candidate

The permissions for system-critical data in an anonymous FTP account are inappropriate. For example, the root directory is writeable by world, a real password file is obtainable, or executable commands such as "ls" can be overwritten.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/6253

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(3) Baker, Northcutt, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech

Northcutt> That that starts to get specific :) | Frech> ftp-writable-directory(6253) | ftp-write(53) | "writeable" in the description should be "writable."

CVE-1999-0528

Candidate

A router or firewall forwards external packets that claim to come from inside the network that the router/firewall is in front of.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/8372

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(3) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> possibly XF:nisd-dns-fwd-check | CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to MODIFY] | Frech> XF:firewall-external-packet-forwarding(8372)

CVE-1999-0529

Candidate

A router or firewall forwards packets that claim to come from IANA reserved or private addresses, e.g. 10.x.x.x, 127.x.x.x, 217.x.x.x, etc.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0529

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(1) Frech | MODIFY(2) Baker, Meunier | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> I have seen ISPs "assign" private addresses within their domain | Meunier> A border router or firewall forwards packets that claim to come from IANA | reserved or private addresses, e.g. 10.x.x.x, 127.x.x.x, 217.x.x.x, | etc, outside of their area of validity. | CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to ACCEPT] | Baker> I think the description should be modified to say they accept this type of traffic from an interface not residing on private/reserved network.

CVE-1999-0530

Candidate

A system is operating in "promiscuous" mode which allows it to perform packet sniffing.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/778

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Frech | REJECT(1) Shostack

Frech> XF:etherstatd(264) | XF:sniffer-attack(778) | XF:decod-packet-capture-remote(1072) | XF:netmon-running(1448) | XF:netxray3-probe(1450) | XF:sol-snoop-getquota-bo(3670) (also assigned to CVE-1999-0974) | Baker> Does pose a problem in non-switched environments

CVE-1999-0531

Candidate

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "An SMTP service supports EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and/or EHLO."

Modified (20080731)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Christey | RECAST(1) Shostack | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Shostack> I think expn != vrfy, help, esmtp. | Frech> XF:lotus-domino-esmtp-bo(4499) (also assigned to CVE-2000-0452 and | CVE-2000-1046) | XF:smtp-expn(128) | XF:smtp-vrfy(130) | XF:smtp-helo-bo(886) | XF:smtp-vrfy-bo(887) | XF:smtp-expn-bo(888) | XF:slmail-vrfyexpn-overflow(1721) | XF:smtp-ehlo(323) | | Perhaps add RCPT? If so, add XF:smtp-rcpt(1928) | Christey> XF:smtp-vrfy(130) ?

CVE-1999-0532

Candidate

A DNS server allows zone transfers.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0532

Proposed (19990726)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> (With split DNS implementations this is quite appropriate) | Frech> XF:dns-zonexfer

CVE-1999-0533

Candidate

A DNS server allows inverse queries.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0533

Proposed (19990726)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> (rule of thumb) | Frech> XF:dns-iquery

CVE-1999-0534

Candidate

A Windows NT user has inappropriate rights or privileges, e.g. Act as System, Add Workstation, Backup, Change System Time, Create Pagefile, Create Permanent Object, Create Token Name, Debug, Generate Security Audit, Increase Priority, Increase Quota, Load Driver, Lock Memory, Profile Single Process, Remote Shutdown, Replace Process Token, Restore, System Environment, Take Ownership, or Unsolicited Input.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0534

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(5) Baker, Christey, Ozancin, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(2) Frech, Northcutt

Northcutt> If we are going to write a laundry list put access to the scheduler in it. | Christey> The list of privileges is very useful for lookup. | Frech> XF:nt-create-token | XF:nt-replace-token | XF:nt-lock-memory | XF:nt-increase-quota | XF:nt-unsol-input | XF:nt-act-system | XF:nt-create-object | XF:nt-sec-audit | XF:nt-add-workstation | XF:nt-manage-log | XF:nt-take-owner | XF:nt-load-driver | XF:nt-profile-system | XF:nt-system-time | XF:nt-single-process | XF:nt-increase-priority | XF:nt-create-pagefile | XF:nt-backup | XF:nt-restore | XF:nt-debug | XF:nt-system-env | XF:nt-remote-shutdown

CVE-1999-0535

Candidate

A Windows NT account policy for passwords has inappropriate, security-critical settings, e.g. for password length, password age, or uniqueness.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0535

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(2) Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(2) Baker, Frech | RECAST(2) Northcutt, Ozancin

Northcutt> inappropriate implies there is appropriate. As a guy who has been | monitoring | networks for years I have deep reservations about justiying the existance | of any fixed cleartext password. For appropriate to exist, some "we" would | have to establish some criteria for appropriate passwords. | Baker> Perhaps this could be re-worded a bit. The CVE CVE-1999-00582 | specifies "...settings for lockouts". To remain consistent with the | other, maybe it should specify "...settings for passwords" I think | most people would agree that passwords should be at least 8 | characters; contain letters (upper and lowercase), numbers and at | least one non-alphanumeric; should only be good a limited time 30-90 | days; and should not contain character combinations from user's prior | 2 or 3 passwords. | Suggested rewrite - | A Windows NT account policy does not enforce reasonable minimum | security-critical settings for passwords, e.g. passwords of sufficient | length, periodic required password changes, or new password uniqueness | Ozancin> What is appropriate? | Frech> XF:nt-autologonpwd | XF:nt-pwlen | XF:nt-maxage | XF:nt-minage | XF:nt-pw-history | XF:nt-user-pwnoexpire | XF:nt-unknown-pwdfilter | XF:nt-pwd-never-expire | XF:nt-pwd-nochange | XF:nt-pwdcache-enable | XF:nt-guest-change-passwords

CVE-1999-0537

Candidate

A configuration in a web browser such as Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator allows execution of active content such as ActiveX, Java, Javascript, etc.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0537

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Frech | REJECT(1) LeBlanc

Frech> Good candidate for dot notation. | XF:nav-java-enabled | XF:nav-javascript-enabled | XF:ie-active-content | XF:ie-active-download | XF:ie-active-scripting | XF:ie-activex-execution | XF:ie-java-enabled | XF:netscape-javascript | XF:netscape-java | XF:zone-active-scripting | XF:zone-activex-execution | XF:zone-desktop-install | XF:zone-low-channel | XF:zone-file-download | XF:zone-file-launch | XF:zone-java-scripting | XF:zone-low-java | XF:zone-safe-scripting | XF:zone-unsafe-scripting | LeBlanc> Not a vulnerability. These are just checks for configuration | settings that a user might have changed. I understand need to increase | number of checks in a scanning product, but don't feel like these belong | in CVE. Scanner vendors could argue that these entries are needed to | keep a common language. | Baker> Not sure about whether we should bother to include this type issue or not. It does provide a stepping stone for further actions, but in and of itself it isn't a specific vulnerability.

CVE-1999-0539

Candidate

A trust relationship exists between two Unix hosts.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/723

Proposed (19990728)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(2) Northcutt, Shostack

Northcutt> Too non specific | Frech> XF:trusted-host(341) | XF:trust-remote-same(717) | XF:trust-remote-root(718) | XF:trust-remote-nonroot(719) | XF:trust-remote-any(720) | XF:trust-other-host(723) | XF:trust-all-nonroot(726) | XF:trust-any-remote(727) | XF:trust-local-acct(728) | XF:trust-local-any(729) | XF:trust-local-nonroot(730) | XF:trust-all-hosts(731) | XF:nt-trusted-domain(1284) | XF:rsagent-trusted-domainadded(1588) | XF:trust-remote-user(2955) | XF:user-trust-hosts(3074) | XF:user-trust-other-host(3077) | XF:user-trust-remote-account(3079)

CVE-1999-0541

Candidate

A password for accessing a WWW URL is guessable.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0541

Proposed (19990714)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Meunier, Northcutt, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> XF:http-password

CVE-1999-0546

Candidate

The Windows NT guest account is enabled.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0546

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(5) Baker, Northcutt, Ozancin, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech

Frech> XF:nt-guest-account

CVE-1999-0547

Candidate

An SSH server allows authentication through the .rhosts file.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/315

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Shostack | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Northcutt

Frech> XF:sshd-rhosts(315)

CVE-1999-0548

Candidate

A superfluous NFS server is running, but it is not importing or exporting any file systems.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0548

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Shostack | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(1) Northcutt

CVE-1999-0549

Candidate

Windows NT automatically logs in an administrator upon rebooting.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0549

Proposed (19990630)

ACCEPT(1) Hill | MODIFY(3) Blake, Frech, Ozancin | NOOP(1) Wall | REJECT(1) Baker

Wall> Don't know what this is. Don't think it is a vulnerability and would | initially reject. This is different than just renaming the | administrator account. | Frech> Would appreciate more information on this one, as in a reference. | Blake> Reference: XF:nt-autologin | Ozancin> Needs more detail | Baker> I tried to find the XF:nt-autologin reference, and got no matching records from their search engine. | No refs, no details, should reject | CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to MODIFY] | Frech> XF:nt-autologon(5)

CVE-1999-0550

Candidate

A router's routing tables can be obtained from arbitrary hosts.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0550

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> Don't you mean obtained by arbitrary hosts | Frech> XF:routed | XF:decod-rip-entry | XF:rip | Baker> Concur with this as a security issue

CVE-1999-0551

Entry

HP OpenMail can be misconfigured to allow users to run arbitrary commands using malicious print requests.

HP:HPSBUX9804-078 | URL:http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=HPSBUX9804-078 | XF:hp-openmail

CVE-1999-0554

Candidate

NFS exports system-critical data to the world, e.g. / or a password file.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0554

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(2) Northcutt, Wall | NOOP(1) Baker | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Christey> A content decision (CD:CF-DATA) needs to be reviewed | and accepted by the Editorial Board in order to resolve | this question.

CVE-1999-0555

Candidate

A Unix account with a name other than "root" has UID 0, i.e. root privileges.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0555

Proposed (19990728)

NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(2) Northcutt, Shostack

Northcutt> This is very bogus

CVE-1999-0556

Candidate

Two or more Unix accounts have the same UID.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/876

Proposed (19990728)

NOOP(2) Baker, Christey | REJECT(2) Northcutt, Shostack

Christey> XF:duplicate-uid(876) | Christey> Add terms "duplicate" and "user ID" to facilitate search. | ftp://ftp.auscert.org.au/pub/auscert/papers/unix_security_checklist

CVE-1999-0559

Candidate

A system-critical Unix file or directory has inappropriate permissions.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0559

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | RECAST(2) Northcutt, Shostack

Northcutt> Writable other than by root/bin/wheelgroup?

CVE-1999-0560

Candidate

A system-critical Windows NT file or directory has inappropriate permissions.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0560

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> I think we should specify these

CVE-1999-0561

Candidate

IIS has the #exec function enabled for Server Side Include (SSI) files.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0561

Proposed (19990728)

NOOP(2) Baker, Northcutt | RECAST(1) Shostack | REJECT(1) LeBlanc

LeBlanc> Does not meet definition of a vulnerability. This function is | just enabled. You can turn it off if you want. if you trust the people | putting up your web pages, this isn't a problem. If you don't, this is | just one of many things you need to change.

CVE-1999-0562

Candidate

The registry in Windows NT can be accessed remotely by users who are not administrators.

OVAL:oval:org.mitre.oval:def:1023 | URL:https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1023

Modified (20061101)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Ozancin, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> This isn't all or nothing, users may be allowed to access part of the | registry. | Frech> XF:nt-winreg-all | XF:nt-winreg-net

CVE-1999-0564

Candidate

An attacker can force a printer to print arbitrary documents (e.g. if the printer doesn't require a password) or to become disabled.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0564

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Shostack | NOOP(1) Northcutt

CVE-1999-0565

Candidate

A Sendmail alias allows input to be piped to a program.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0565

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Northcutt | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Shostack | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Shostack> Is this a default alias? Is my .procmailrc an instance of this? | Christey> It is not entirely clear whether the simple fact that an alias | pipes into a program should be considered a vulnerability. It | all depends on the behavior of that particular program. This | is one of a number of configuration-related issues from the | "draft" CVE that came from vulnerability scanners. In | general, when we get to general configuration and "policy," | it becomes more difficult to use the current CVE model to | represent them. So at the very least, this candidate (and | similar ones) should be given close consideration and | discussion before being added to the official CVE list. | | Because this candidate is related to general configuration | issues, and we have not completely determined how to handle | such issues in CVE, this candidate cannot be promoted to an | official CVE entry until such issues are resolved.

CVE-1999-0566

Entry

An attacker can write to syslog files from any location, causing a denial of service by filling up the logs, and hiding activities.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0566 | XF:ibm-syslogd | XF:syslog-flood

CVE-1999-0568

Candidate

rpc.admind in Solaris is not running in a secure mode.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0568

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Northcutt | NOOP(2) Baker, Christey | RECAST(2) Dik, Shostack

Shostack> are there secure modes? | Dik> Several: | 1) there is no "rpc.admind" daemon. | there used to be a "admind" RPC daemon (100087/10) | and there's now an "sadmind" daemon (100232/10) | The switch over was somewhere around Solaris 2.4. | 2) Neither defaults to "secure mode" | 3) secure mode is "using secure RPC" which does | proper over the wire authentication by specifying | the "-S 2" option in inetd.conf | (security level 2) | Christey> XF:rpc-admind(626) | http://xforce.iss.net/static/626.php | MISC:http://pulhas.org/xploitsdb/mUNIXes/admind.html

CVE-1999-0569

Candidate

A URL for a WWW directory allows auto-indexing, which provides a list of all files in that directory if it does not contain an index.html file.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0569

Modified (19991130)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | NOOP(2) Baker, Christey | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> I do this intentionally somethings in high content directories | Christey> XF:http-noindex(90) ?

CVE-1999-0570

Candidate

Windows NT is not using a password filter utility, e.g. PASSFILT.DLL.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0570

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Baker, Christey | REJECT(1) Wall

Northcutt> Here we are crossing into the best practices arena again. However since | passfilt does establish a measurable standard and since we aren't the | ones defining the stanard, simply saying it should be employed I will | vote for this. | Frech> XF:nt-passfilt-not-inst(1308) | XF:nt-passfilt-not-found(1309) | Christey> Consider MSKB:Q161990 and MSKB:Q151082

CVE-1999-0571

Candidate

A router's configuration service or management interface (such as a web server or telnet) is configured to allow connections from arbitrary hosts.

BUGTRAQ:Feb5,1999 | MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0571

Modified (20020312)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Christey, Northcutt

CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to MODIFY] | Frech> XF:ascend-config-kill(889) | XF:cisco-ios-crash(1238) | XF:webramp-remote-access(1670) | XF:ascom-timeplex-debug(1824) | XF:netopia-unpassworded(1850) | XF:cisco-web-crash(1886) | XF:cisco-router-commands(1951) | XF:motorola-cable-default-pass(2002) | XF:default-flowpoint(2091) | XF:netgear-router-idle-dos(4003) | XF:cisco-cbos-telnet(4251) | XF:routermate-snmp-community(4290) | XF:cayman-router-dos(4479) | XF:wavelink-authentication(5185) | XF:ciscosecure-ldap-bypass-authentication(5274) | XF:foundry-firmware-telnet-dos(5514) | XF:netopia-view-system-log(5536) | XF:cisco-webadmin-remote-dos(5595) | XF:cisco-cbos-web-access(5626) | XF:netopia-telnet-dos(6001) | XF:cisco-sn-gain-access(6827) | XF:cayman-dsl-insecure-permissions(6841) | XF:linksys-etherfast-reveal-passwords(6949) | XF:zyxel-router-default-password(6968) | XF:cisco-cbos-web-config(7027) | XF:prestige-wan-bypass-filter(7146) | Christey> I changed the description to make it more explicit that this | candidate is about router configuration, as opposed to | vulnerabilities that accidentally make a configuration | service accessible to anyone.

CVE-1999-0572

Candidate

.reg files are associated with the Windows NT registry editor (regedit), making the registry susceptible to Trojan Horse attacks.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/178

Modified (20041017)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Ozancin, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Christey, Northcutt

Northcutt> I don't quite get what this means, sorry | Frech> XF:nt-regfile(178) | Christey> MISC:http://security-archive.merton.ox.ac.uk/nt-security-199902/0087.html

CVE-1999-0575

Candidate

A Windows NT system's user audit policy does not log an event success or failure, e.g. for Logon and Logoff, File and Object Access, Use of User Rights, User and Group Management, Security Policy Changes, Restart, Shutdown, and System, and Process Tracking.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0575

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(4) Christey, Ozancin, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | RECAST(2) Baker, Northcutt

Northcutt> It isn't a great truth that you should enable all or the above, if you | do you potentially introduce a vulnerbility of filling up the file | system with stuff you will never look at. | Ozancin> It is far less interesting what a user does successfully that what they | attempt and fail at. | Christey> The list of event types is very useful for lookup. | Frech> XF:nt-system-audit | XF:nt-logon-audit | XF:nt-object-audit | XF:nt-privil-audit | XF:nt-process-audit | XF:nt-policy-audit | XF:nt-account-audit | CHANGE> [Baker changed vote from REVIEWING to RECAST]

CVE-1999-0576

Candidate

A Windows NT system's file audit policy does not log an event success or failure for security-critical files or directories.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0576

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(3) Baker, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(2) Frech, Ozancin | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> 1.) Too general are we ready to state what the security-critical files | and directories are | 2.) Does Ataris, Windows CE, PalmOS, Linux have such a capability | Ozancin> Some files and directories are clearly understood to be critical. Others are | unclear. We need to clarify that critical is. | Frech> XF:nt-object-audit

CVE-1999-0577

Candidate

A Windows NT system's file audit policy does not log an event success or failure for non-critical files or directories.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0577

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(2) Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(3) Baker, Frech, Ozancin | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Ozancin> It is far less interesting what a user does successfully that what they | attempt and fail at. | Perhaps only failure should be logged. | Frech> XF:nt-object-audit | CHANGE> [Baker changed vote from REVIEWING to MODIFY] | Baker> Failure on non-critical files is what should be monitored.

CVE-1999-0578

Candidate

A Windows NT system's registry audit policy does not log an event success or failure for security-critical registry keys.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/228

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(4) Baker, Ozancin, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Ozancin> with reservation | Again what is defined as critical | CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to MODIFY] | Frech> XF:nt-object-audit(228)

CVE-1999-0579

Candidate

A Windows NT system's registry audit policy does not log an event success or failure for non-critical registry keys.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/228

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(3) Baker, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(2) Frech, Ozancin | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Ozancin> Again only failure may be of interest. It would be impractical to wad | through the incredibly large amount of logging that this would generate. It | could overwhelm log entries that you might find interesting. | CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to MODIFY] | Frech> XF:nt-object-audit(228)

CVE-1999-0580

Candidate

The HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE key in a Windows NT system has inappropriate, system-critical permissions.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0580

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> I think we can define appropriate, take a look at the nt security .pdf | and see if you can't see a way to phrase specific keys in a way that | defines inappropriate. | Baker> This is way vague...

CVE-1999-0581

Candidate

The HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT key in a Windows NT system has inappropriate, system-critical permissions.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0581

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> I think we can define appropriate, take a look at the nt security .pdf | and see if you can't see a way to phrase specific keys in a way that | defines inappropriate. | Baker> way too vague

CVE-1999-0582

Candidate

A Windows NT account policy has inappropriate, security-critical settings for lockout, e.g. lockout duration, lockout after bad logon attempts, etc.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0582

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(3) Ozancin, Shostack, Wall | MODIFY(2) Baker, Frech | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> The definition is? | Baker> Maybe a rewording of this one too. I think most people would agree on | some "minimum" policies like 3-5 bad attempts lockout for an hour or | until the administrator unlocks the account. | Suggested rewrite - | A Windows NT account policy does not enforce reasonable minimum | security-critical settings for lockouts, e.g. lockout duration, | lockout after bad logon attempts, etc. | Ozancin> with reservations | What is appropriate? | Frech> XF:nt-thres-lockout | XF:nt-lock-duration | XF:nt-lock-window | XF:nt-perm-lockout | XF:lockout-disabled

CVE-1999-0583

Candidate

There is a one-way or two-way trust relationship between Windows NT domains.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/1284

Proposed (19990728)

NOOP(2) Baker, Christey | REJECT(2) Northcutt, Shostack

Christey> XF:nt-trusted-domain(1284)

CVE-1999-0584

Candidate

A Windows NT file system is not NTFS.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/195

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(2) Northcutt, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Baker, Christey

Wall> NTFS partition provides the security. This could be re-worded | to "A Windows NT file system is FAT" since it is either NTFS or FAT | and FAT is less secure. | Frech> XF:nt-filesys(195) | Christey> MSKB:Q214579 | MSKB:Q214579 | http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q100/1/08.ASP

CVE-1999-0585

Candidate

A Windows NT administrator account has the default name of Administrator.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0585

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(1) Ozancin | MODIFY(1) Frech | REJECT(3) Baker, Northcutt, Shostack | REVIEWING(1) Wall

Wall> Some sources say this is not a vulnerability, but a warning. It just | slows down the search for the admin account (SID = 500) which can | always be found. | Northcutt> I change this on all NT systems I am responsible for, but is | root a vulnerability? | Baker> There are ways to identify the administrator account anyway, so this | is only a minor delay to someone that is knowledgeable. This, in and | of itself, doesn't really strike me as a vulnerability, anymore than | the root account on a Unix box. | Shostack> (there is no way to hide the account name today) | Frech> XF:nt-adminexists

CVE-1999-0586

Candidate

A network service is running on a nonstandard port.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0586

Proposed (19990728)

NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Shostack | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Shostack> Might be acceptable if clearer; is that a standard service on a | non-standard port, or any service on an unassigned port? | Baker> It might actually be an enhancement rather than a problem to run a service on a non-standard port

CVE-1999-0587

Candidate

A WWW server is not running in a restricted file system, e.g. through a chroot, thus allowing access to system-critical data.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0587

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> While I would accept this for Unix, I am not sure this applies to NT, | VMS, palm pilots, or commodore 64

CVE-1999-0588

Candidate

A filter in a router or firewall allows unusual fragmented packets.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/CVE-1999-0588

Proposed (19990726)

MODIFY(2) Baker, Frech | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> I want to vote to accept this one, but unusual is a shade broad. | Frech> XF:nt-rras | XF:cisco-fragmented-attacks | XF:ip-frag | Baker> Perhaps we should use the word abnormally fragmented or some other descriptor.

CVE-1999-0589

Candidate

A system-critical Windows NT registry key has inappropriate permissions.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0589

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(2) Christey, Northcutt

Northcutt> I think we can define appropriate, take a look at the nt security .pdf | and see if you can't see a way to phrase specific keys in a way that | defines inappropriate. | Christey> Upon further reflection, this is too high-level for CVE. | Specific registry keys with bad permissions is roughly | equivalent to Unix configuration files that have bad | permissions; those permission problems can be created by | any vendor, not just a specific one. Therefore this | candidate should be RECAST into each separate registry | key that has this problem.

CVE-1999-0590

Candidate

A system does not present an appropriate legal message or warning to a user who is accessing it.

MISC:http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/bulletins/j-043.shtml

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Christey | RECAST(1) Shostack

Christey> ADDREF CIAC:J-043 | URL:http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/bulletins/j-043.shtml | Also add "banner" to the description to facilitate search. | Baker> Should be in place where ever it is possible

CVE-1999-0591

Candidate

An event log in Windows NT has inappropriate access permissions.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0591

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> splain Lucy, splain

CVE-1999-0592

Candidate

The Logon box of a Windows NT system displays the name of the last user who logged in.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/1353

Proposed (19990728)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Baker, Christey | REJECT(2) Northcutt, Wall

Wall> Information gathering, not vulnerability | Northcutt> Ah a C2 weenie must have snuck this in, this can be a good thing | not just vulnerability | Frech> XF:nt-display-last-username(1353) | Use it if you will. :-) If not, let us know so I can remove the CAN | reference from our database. | Christey> MSKB:Q114463 | http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q114/4/63.asp

CVE-1999-0593

Candidate

The default setting for the Winlogon key entry ShutdownWithoutLogon in Windows NT allows users with physical access to shut down a Windows NT system without logging in.

CONFIRM:http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc722469.aspx | MISC:http://www.microsoft.com/technet/archive/winntas/deploy/confeat/06wntpcc.mspx?mfr=true | OSVDB:59333 | URL:http://osvdb.org/59333 | XF:nt-shutdown-without-logon(1291) | URL:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/1291

Modified (20091029)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Wall> Still a denial of service. | Northcutt> May well be appropriate | Frech> XF:nt-shutdown-without-logon(1291)

CVE-1999-0594

Candidate

A Windows NT system does not restrict access to removable media drives such as a floppy disk drive or CDROM drive.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/1294

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Baker, Christey | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Wall> Perhaps it can be re-worded to "removable media drives | such as a floppy disk drive or CDROM drive can be accessed (shared) in a | Windows NT system." | Northcutt> - what good is my NT w/o its floppy | Frech> XF:nt-allocate-cdroms(1294) | XF:nt-allocate-floppy(1318) | Christey> MSKB:Q172520 | URL:http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q172/5/20.asp

CVE-1999-0595

Candidate

A Windows NT system does not clear the system page file during shutdown, which might allow sensitive information to be recorded.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/216 | MSKB:Q182086

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Northcutt

Frech> XF:nt-clearpage(216) | XF:reg-pagefile-clearing(2551)

CVE-1999-0596

Candidate

A Windows NT log file has an inappropriate maximum size or retention period.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/2577

Proposed (19990728)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(2) Northcutt, Wall

Northcutt> define appropriate | Frech> XF:reg-app-log-small(2521) | XF:reg-sec-log-maxsize(2577) | XF:reg-sys-log-small(2586)

CVE-1999-0597

Candidate

A Windows NT account policy does not forcibly disconnect remote users from the server when their logon hours expire.

MISC:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/1343

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Northcutt | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(1) Wall

Frech> XF:nt-forced-logoff(1343)

CVE-1999-0598

Candidate

A network intrusion detection system (IDS) does not properly handle packets that are sent out of order, allowing an attacker to escape detection.

MISC:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(3) Armstrong, Baker, Northcutt | NOOP(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> Waiting for CIEL. | Christey> This is a design flaw, along with the other reported IDS | problems; at least reference Ptacek/Newsham's paper. | Christey> URL:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

CVE-1999-0599

Candidate

A network intrusion detection system (IDS) does not properly handle packets with improper sequence numbers.

MISC:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | NOOP(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> Waiting for CIEL. | Christey> This is a design flaw, along with the other reported IDS | problems; at least reference Ptacek/Newsham's paper. | Christey> URL:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

CVE-1999-0600

Candidate

A network intrusion detection system (IDS) does not verify the checksum on a packet.

MISC:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | NOOP(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> Waiting for CIEL. | Christey> This is a design flaw, along with the other reported IDS | problems; at least reference Ptacek/Newsham's paper. | Christey> URL:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

CVE-1999-0601

Candidate

A network intrusion detection system (IDS) does not properly handle data within TCP handshake packets.

MISC:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | NOOP(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> Waiting for Godot, er, CIEL. | Christey> This is a design flaw, along with the other reported IDS | problems; at least reference Ptacek/Newsham's paper. | Christey> URL:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

CVE-1999-0602

Candidate

A network intrusion detection system (IDS) does not properly reassemble fragmented packets.

MISC:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

Proposed (19990726)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Northcutt | NOOP(1) Frech | REVIEWING(1) Christey

Frech> Waiting for CIEL. | Christey> This is a design flaw, along with the other reported IDS | problems; at least reference Ptacek/Newsham's paper. | Christey> URL:http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html

CVE-1999-0603

Candidate

In Windows NT, an inappropriate user is a member of a group, e.g. Administrator, Backup Operators, Domain Admins, Domain Guests, Power Users, Print Operators, Replicators, System Operators, etc.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0603

Proposed (19990728)

MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Baker | REJECT(2) Northcutt, Wall

Frech> XF:nt-system-operator | XF:nt-admin-group | XF:nt-replicator | XF:nt-print-operator | XF:nt-power-user | XF:nt-guest-in-group | XF:nt-backup-operator | XF:nt-domain-admin | XF:nt-domain-guest | XF:win2k-acct-oper-grp | XF:win2k-admin-grp | XF:win2k-backup-oper-grp | XF:win2k-certpublishers-grp | XF:win2k-dhcp-admin-grp | XF:win2k-dnsadm-grp | XF:win2k-domainadm-grp | XF:win2k-entadm-grp | XF:win2k-printoper-grp | XF:win2k-replicator-grp | XF:win2k-schemaadm-grp | XF:win2k-serveroper-grp | You asked for it... :-) Use or reject at your discretion. If rejected, | please let us know so we can remove CAN references from database.

CVE-1999-0604

Candidate

An incorrect configuration of the WebStore 1.0 shopping cart CGI program "web_store.cgi" could disclose private information.

BUGTRAQ:19990420 Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL:http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=92462991805485&w=2

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Northcutt, Wall

Frech> XF:webstore-misconfig(3861)

CVE-1999-0605

Candidate

An incorrect configuration of the Order Form 1.0 shopping cart CGI program could disclose private information.

BUGTRAQ:19990420 Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL:http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=92462991805485&w=2

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(3) Christey, Northcutt, Wall

Frech> XF:orderform-misconfig(3860) | Christey> BID:2021 | Christey> Mention affected files: order_log_v12.dat and order_log.dat | fix version number (1.2)

CVE-1999-0606

Candidate

An incorrect configuration of the EZMall 2000 shopping cart CGI program "mall2000.cgi" could disclose private information.

BUGTRAQ:19990420 Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL:http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=92462991805485&w=2

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(3) Christey, Northcutt, Wall

Frech> XF:ezmall2000-misconfig(3859) | Christey> Add mall_log_files/order.log to desc

CVE-1999-0607

Candidate

quikstore.cgi in QuikStore shopping cart stores quikstore.cfg under the web document root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain the cleartext administrator password and gain privileges.

BUGTRAQ:19990420 Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL:http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=92462991805485&w=2

Modified (20060608)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(3) Christey, Northcutt, Wall

Frech> XF:quikstore-misconfig(3858) | Christey> http://www.quikstore.com/help/pages/Security/security.htm says: | | "It is IMPORTANT that during the setup of the QuikStore program, you | check to make sure that the cgi-bin or executable program directory | of your web site not be viewable from the outside world. You don't | want the users to have access to your programs or log files that could | be stored there! | | ... | | If you can view or download these files from the browser, someone | else can too" | | So is this a configuration problem? See the configuration file at | http://www.quikstore.com/help/pages/Configuration/configparametersfull.htm | The [DIRECTORY_PATHS] section identifies pathnames and describes how | pathnames are constructed. It clearly uses relative pathnames, | so all data is underneath the base directory!! | | If we call this a configuration problem, then maybe this (and | all other "CGI-data-in-web-tree" configuration problems) should | be combined. | Christey> Consider adding BID:1983

CVE-1999-0608

Entry

An incorrect configuration of the PDG Shopping Cart CGI program "shopper.cgi" could disclose private information.

BUGTRAQ:19990420 Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL:http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=92462991805485&w=2 | CONFIRM:http://www.pdgsoft.com/Security/security.html. | XF:pdgsoftcart-misconfig(3857) | URL:https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/3857

CVE-1999-0609

Candidate

An incorrect configuration of the SoftCart CGI program "SoftCart.exe" could disclose private information.

BUGTRAQ:19990420 Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL:http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=92462991805485&w=2

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(3) Christey, Northcutt, Wall

Frech> XF:softcart-misconfig(3856) | Christey> Consider adding BID:2055

CVE-1999-0610

Candidate

An incorrect configuration of the Webcart CGI program could disclose private information.

BUGTRAQ:19990420 Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL:http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=92462991805485&w=2

Proposed (19990728)

ACCEPT(1) Baker | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(2) Northcutt, Wall

Frech> Cite reference as: | BUGTRAQ:19990424 Re: Shopping Carts exposing CC data | URL: | http://www.securityfocus.com/frames/?content=/templates/archive.pike%3Flist% | 3D1%26date%3D2000-08-22%26msg%[email protected] | CHANGE> [Frech changed vote from REVIEWING to MODIFY] | Frech> XF:webcart-data-exposure(8374)

CVE-1999-0611

Candidate

A system-critical Windows NT registry key has an inappropriate value.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0611

Proposed (19990803)

ACCEPT(1) Wall | NOOP(1) Baker | RECAST(1) Northcutt

Northcutt> I think we can define appropriate, take a look at the nt security .pdf | and see if you can't see a way to phrase specific keys in a way that | defines inappropriate. | Baker> too vague

CVE-1999-0612

Entry

A version of finger is running that exposes valid user information to any entity on the network.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0612 | XF:finger-out | XF:finger-running

CVE-1999-0613

Candidate

The rpc.sprayd service is running.

MISC:https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-1999-0613

Proposed (19990721)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Ozancin | MODIFY(1) Frech | NOOP(1) Wall | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Frech> XF:sprayd

CVE-1999-0614

Candidate

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The FTP service is running."

Modified (20080731)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | REJECT(1) Northcutt

CVE-1999-0615

Candidate

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SNMP service is running."

Modified (20080731)

ACCEPT(3) Baker, Prosser, Wall | NOOP(1) Christey | REJECT(1) Northcutt

Baker> Although newer versions on snmp are not as vulnerable as prior versions, | this can still be a significant risk of exploitation, as seen in recent | attacks on snmp services via automated worms | Christey> XF:snmp(132) ? | Prosser> This fits the "exposure" description although we also know there are many vulnerabilities in SNMP. This is more of a policy/best practice issue for administrators. If you need SNMP lock it down as tight as you can, if you don't need it, don't run it.

CVE-1999-0616

Candidate

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The TFTP service is running."

Modified (20080731)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | REJECT(1) Northcutt

CVE-1999-0617

Candidate

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SMTP service is running."

Modified (20080731)

ACCEPT(2) Baker, Wall | REJECT(1) Northcutt