Datasets:

minh21

/

COVID-QA-Chunk-64-sentence-transformer-biencoder-data-65_25_10

like 0

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

The 2-3 % prevalence of active MERS-CoV infections is not dissimilar to the hospital-based prevalence of other human CoVs. However, the proportion of deaths among those infected with MERS-CoV is much higher than that known for the HCoVs NL63, HKU1, 229E or OC43 in other countries, and even above that for SARS-CoV; it is not a virus that could reasonably be described as a "storm in a teacup". It is the low transmission rate that has prevented worldwide spread, despite many "opportunities".

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

By mid-September there had been approximately170 cases reported but the outbreak appeared to been brought under control in November. It became apparent early on that MERS-CoV spread relatively ineffectively from human-to-human. Despite ongoing and possibly seasonal introduction of virus to the human population via infected DCs and perhaps other animals yet to be identified, the vast majority of MERS-CoV transmission has occurred from infected to uninfected humans in close and prolonged contact through circumstances created by poor infection control in health care settings.

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

It seems that the majority of human cases of MERS-CoV, even when numbers appear to increase suddenly, do not readily transmit to more than one other human so to date, the localized epidemic of MERS-CoV has not been self-sustaining . That is to say, the basic reproduction number R 0 -the average number of infections caused by one infected individual in a fully susceptible populationhas been close to one throughout various clusters and outbreaks. If R 0 was greater than 1, a sustained increase in case numbers would be expected.

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

Since then, MERS-CoV sequences have been found in a bat and in many dromedary camels DC . MERS-CoV is enzootic in DC across the Arabian Peninsula and in parts of Africa, causing mild upper respiratory tract illness in its camel reservoir and sporadic, but relatively rare human infections. Precisely how virus transmits to humans remains unknown but close and lengthy exposure appears to be a requirement.

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

There appears to be a 2-3 % prevalence of MERS-CoV in the KSA with a 5 % chance of secondary transmission within the household. There is an increased risk of infection through certain occupations at certain times and a much greater chance for spread to other humans during circumstances created by humans, which drives more effective transmission than any R 0 would predict on face value. Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events.

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

When tested, samples positive for MERS-CoV are often negative for other pathogens . However, many studies make no mention of additional testing for endemic human respiratory viruses . When viruses are sought, they have included human herpesvirus HHV , rhinoviruses HRV , enteroviruses EV , respiratory syncytial virus RSV , parainfluenzavirus types 1, 2 and 3 PIVs ,influenzaviruses IFVs , endemic HCoVs, adenoviruses AdVs metapneumovirus MPV and influenza A\H1N1 virus; co-detections with MERS-CoV have been found on occasion .

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

However,an absence of unexplained pneumonia that may be attributable to MERS-CoV infection may not signal the absence of virus among humans in each country but simply reflect a lack of expensive epidemiology studies conducted by resource-poor countries. It is thus unclear whether MERS-CoV, or an antigenically related CoV, is an unrecognized pathogen in these regions, perhaps circulating for even longer than it has been known in the Arabian Peninsula . MERS-CoV RNA has also been detected in DC samples, and recovery of infectious virus has also been achieved from DC samples 4, 77, 117, 132, .

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

Contemporary surveys are needed. MERS-CoV does not appear to be easily transmitted from DCs to humans, or perhaps it is , but generally does not trigger a detectable immune response if only mild disease or asymptomatic infection results. Serology assays are in need of further validation in this area so care is required when moving newly developed diagnostic serology algorithms from a research setting to one that informs public health decisions.

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

The spread of MERS-CoV among humans has often been associated with outbreaks in hospitals, with around 20 % of all cases to date involving healthcare workers HCWs . Although DCs appear to suffer the equivalent of a 'common cold' from MERS-CoV infection, in humans, the virus can be a more serious and opportunistic pathogen associated with the death of up to 40 % of reported cases. It has yet to be established whether infections thought to have been acquired from an animal source produce a more severe outcome than those spread between humans .

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

Bat-to-human infection by MERS-CoV is a purely speculative event. The only piece of MERS-CoV-specific evidence pointing to bats originates from amplification of a 190 nt fragment of the RNAdependent RNA polymerase gene of the MERS-CoV genome, identified in a faecal pellet from an insectivorous Emballonuridae bat, Taphozous perforatus found in Bisha, the KSA . While very short, the sequence of the fragment defined it as a diagnostic discovery.

Is there any evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern?

Nonetheless, despite multiple mass gatherings that have afforded the virus many millions of opportunities to spread, there have remarkably been no reported outbreaks of MERS or MERS-CoV during or immediately after these events. There is no evidence that MERS-CoV is a virus of pandemic concern. Nonetheless, hospital settings continue to describe MERS cases and outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula.

In comparison, influenza A virus decreased by 95 % . MERS-CoV survival is inferior to that previously demonstrated for SARS-CoV . For context, pathogenic bacteria can remain viable and airborne for 45 min in a coughed aerosol and can spread 4 m. MERS-CoV's ability to remain viable over long time periods gives it the capacity to thoroughly contaminate a room's surfaces when occupied by an infected and symptomatic patient .

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on . From July 2013, the revised WHO case definition included the importance of seeking out and understanding the role of asymptomatic cases and from June 2014, the WHO definition more clearly stated that a confirmed case included any person whose sample was RT-PCR positive for MERS-CoV, or who produced a seroconversion, irrespective of clinical signs and symptoms. Apart from the WHO and the KSA Ministry of Health reports, asymptomatic or subclinical cases of MERS-CoV infection were documented in the scientific literature although not always as often as occurred early on .

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

Apart from the WHO and the KSA Ministry of Health reports, asymptomatic or subclinical cases of MERS-CoV infection were documented in the scientific literature although not always as often as occurred early on . The KSA definition of a case became more strict on 13 th May 2014, relying on the presence of both clinical features and laboratory confirmation . Testing of asymptomatic people was recommended against from December 2014 , reinforced by a case definition released by the KSA Ministry of Health in June 2015 .

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

Among those with progressive illness, the median time to death is 11 to 13 days, ranging from five to 27 days . Fever and gastrointestinal symptoms may form a prodrome, after which symptoms decline, only to be followed by a more severe systemic and respiratory syndrome . The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement.

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

A second trimester stillbirth occurred in a pregnant woman during an acute respiratory illness and while not RT-rtPCR positive, the mother did subsequently develop antibodies to MERS-CoV, suggestive of recent infection . Her exposure history to a MERS-CoV RT-rtPCR positive relative and an antibody-reactive husband, her incubation period and her symptom history met the WHO criteria for being a probable MERS-CoV case . Diagnostic methods were published within days of the ProMED email announcing the first MERS case , including several now gold standard in-house RT-rtPCR assays Fig.

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

Some MERS patients are listed in WHO disease notices as being in proximity to DCs or farms, but the individuals have not described coming into contact with the animals. No alternative path for acquiring infection is reported in many of these instances. What constitutes a definition of "contact" during these interviews has been defined for one study .

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

For example, there were 83 contacts, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, of a case treated in Germany who travelled from the UAE but no sign of virus or antibody were found in any of them . The very first MERS case had made contact with 56 HCWs and 48 others, but none developed any indication of infection . In a study of 123 contacts of a case treated in France, only seven matched the definition for a possible case and were tested; one who had shared a 20 m 2 hospital room while in a bed 1.5 m away from the index case for a prolonged period was positive .

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

In May 2013, the WHO published guidelines for IPC during care of probable or confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infection in a healthcare setting . This is explainable because to date, each case rise has been intimately associated with healthcare-facility related outbreaks . These rises in MERS-CoV detections can decrease the average age during each event because HCWs are usually younger than inpatients with MERS.

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

Contacts of confirmed MERS cases were often observed for clinical illness, but not tested. These omissions may have confounded our understanding of MERS-CoV transmission and biased early data towards higher numbers of seriously ill and hospitalized patients, inflating the apparent proportion of fatal cases. Case-control studies were not a focus.

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

Testing of asymptomatic people was recommended against from December 2014 , reinforced by a case definition released by the KSA Ministry of Health in June 2015 . The KSA has been the source of 79 % of human cases. Severe MERS is notable for its impact among older men with comorbid diseases including diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis and various lung, renal and cardiac conditions .

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

Today, animal MERS-CoV infections must be reported to the world organization for animal health as an emerging disease . A summary of the first MERS cases reported by the WHO defined animal contact with humans as being direct and within 10 days prior to symptom onset . This definition made no specific allowance for acquisition from DCs through a droplet-based route, which is very likely route for acquisition of a virus that initially and predominantly causes respiratory disease .

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

In stark contrast, a sero-survey of HCW who were sometimes in close and prolonged contact with the first, fatal MERS-CoV case in 2012 , found none of the HCW had seroconverted four months later, despite an absence of eye protection and variable compliance with required PPE standards . Early on in the MERS story, samples for testing were mostly collected from patients with severe illness and not those with milder acute respiratory tract infections. Contacts of confirmed MERS cases were often observed for clinical illness, but not tested.

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

Further testing of the LRT sample from the first MERS case used IFA to screen for some viruses negative for IFV, PIVs, RSV and AdVs and RT-PCR for others negative for AdV, EVs, MPV and HHVs . RT-PCR also detected MERS-CoV. The WHO strongly recommends testing for other respiratory pathogens but with this recommendation often discounted, there are limited data to address the occurrence and impact of co-infections or alternative viral diagnoses among both MERS cases and their contacts.

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

A rise in the cases termed asymptomatic which enlarge the denominator for calculations of the proportion of fatal cases, defined in resulted in a drop in the proportion of fatal cases during the Jeddah-2014 outbreak. Historically, such rises are consistent with changing definitions and laboratory responses and clinical management of a newly discovered virus infection that was first noted only among the severely ill. Upon follow-up, over three-quarters of such MERS-CoV RNA positive people did recall having one or more symptoms at the time, despite being reported as asymptomatic raising some question over the reliability of other reported data.

How did the first WHO case definition define probable cases of MERS?

The first WHO case definition defined probable cases of MERS based on the presence of febrile illness, cough and requirement for hospitalization with suspicion of lower respiratory tract LRT involvement. It also included roles for contact with a probable or confirmed case or for travel or residence within the Arabian Peninsula. If strictly adhered to, only the severe syndrome would be subject to laboratory testing, which was the paradigm early on .

It is apparent that the weekly proportion of infected HCWs increases alongside each steep rise in overall detections Fig. 5 . In May 2013, the WHO published guidelines for IPC during care of probable or confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infection in a healthcare setting .

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

. Host proteins and the coronavirus life cycle. Virus particle attaches onto the host cell via cellular receptors on the surface and enters. Entry is followed by the uncoating of the ribonucleocapsid to expose the positive-sense genomic RNA which is translated by the host ribosomes to yield the viral replication complex.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

The newly formed virus particles undergo maturation when passing through the Golgi and exit the host cell via exocytosis. The relationship between a virus and its host is complex; the virus must evolve evasive strategies to avoid detection and immunological defense mechanisms from the host while the host must develop various lines of defense in order to combat viral invasion. As highlighted in this review, the diverse virus-host interactions established during animal coronavirus and arterivirus infections may have direct implications on viral replication itself, or they may also lead to the modification of numerous signaling pathways, such as cellular stress and/or host antiviral innate immune response, as a means to expedite viral replication and pathogenesis.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

As highlighted in this review, the diverse virus-host interactions established during animal coronavirus and arterivirus infections may have direct implications on viral replication itself, or they may also lead to the modification of numerous signaling pathways, such as cellular stress and/or host antiviral innate immune response, as a means to expedite viral replication and pathogenesis. The intricate network between a virus and its host is a complicated affair that involves many players-derived from both virus and host-which are pitted against one another in the battle for ascendancy; certain host processes are readily assimilated and manipulated by the virus in its bid to impede host antiviral responses while the host is itself armored with several lines of defense mechanisms and numerous antiviral factors to combat viral invasion to prevent its spread. While much progress has been made in the elucidation of the various regulatory pathways that, under the most propitious of conditions, will allow virus and host to co-exist in an uneasy truce, a clearer understanding of the complex interplay between the virus and its host could give new insights into the role of main players, such as those that govern the onset of apoptosis, or type I interferons and their regulators, and lead to the discovery of novel and/or universal targets for the therapeutic mediation against pathogenic infection.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

Membrane-bound cell fragments are also produced as apoptotic bodies to be phagocytosed by surrounding cells. This provides an excellent method for a virus to disperse its progeny without eliciting host immune response . While more comprehensive work needs to be done to paint a clearer picture of how coronaviruses and arteriviruses regulate apoptosis during infection, recent reports have suggested the possible activation of more than one apoptotic pathway during infection.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

Animal coronaviruses, such as infectious bronchitis virus IBV , and arteriviruses, such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus PRRSV , are able to manifest highly contagious infections in their specific native hosts, thereby arising in critical economic damage to animal industries. This review discusses recent progress in studies of virus-host interactions during animal and human coronavirus and arterivirus infections, with emphasis on IBV-host cell interactions. These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

The activation of TLRs-3 and/or -7 as well as cytoplasmic helicases RIG-I and/or MDA-5 triggers signaling pathways resulting in the synthesis of type I IFNs, inflammatory cytokines and ISGs which acts in concert to establish an antiviral state. The activation of both 2'-5' OAS and PKR results in global degradation of cellular RNA and inhibition of translation, which may inhibit viral propagation. Coronaviruses encode many proteins see yellow boxes that target multiple steps in the innate immune response mounted by the host cells, ensuring its successful replication in the host.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

This could account for the fact that while IL-6 mRNA expression is up-regulated during the early stages of coronavirus infection, insubstantial increase in IL-6 protein expression was observed . The inhibition of host protein synthesis through the interaction between coronavirus spike protein and eIF3f may therefore have a significant impact on the modulation of coronavirus pathogenicity. Host proteins are also known to play a role in the virus life cycle, especially during viral RNA replication and transcription Figure 4 .

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

As such, the general sensing of coronaviruses appears to be cell-type specific, with Type I IFNs derived from plasmacytoid dendritic cells pDCs , conventional DCs and macrophages being particularly essential in curbing the pathogenesis of mouse coronavirus infection . Detection by the PRRs would activate signaling cascades leading to the production of type I IFNs, resulting in the establishment of an antiviral state. Thus, coronaviruses do not just avoid detection by the host immune system, which appears to be the main strategy of ensuring successful replication ; some viruses also encode proteins that function to disrupt the downstream signaling cascades at various points, preventing the establishment of an effective antiviral state when detection of the viral PAMPs has occurred.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

Host proteins are also known to play a role in the virus life cycle, especially during viral RNA replication and transcription Figure 4 . The most well studied host protein that interacts with the coronavirus genome is heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 hnRNP A1 , a nuclear protein, whose biological function is to regulate alternative splicing of cellular RNAs . The hnRNP A1 has been shown to bind to both negative-sense leader sequence and negative-sense intergenic IG sequence of MHV .

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

Expressed only in minute amounts, the induction of IRF7, via virus-induced activation of ISGF3, results in either homo-dimerization or hetero-dimerization with IRF3 and is subsequently followed by nuclear translocation for the activation of both IFN and IFN genes . Coronaviruses and arteriviruses have evolved multiple strategies to avoid elimination from the host. These tactics range from the prevention of detection to inhibition of antiviral responses mounted by the host immune system.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

Sub-genomic sized mRNAs are translated by host ribosomes into viral structural S, E, M, N and accessory proteins. The N protein packages the positive-sense genomic RNA into a ribonucleocapsid and is assembled into the virus particles with the help of -actin. The newly formed virus particles undergo maturation when passing through the Golgi and exit the host cell via exocytosis.

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

Thus, coronaviruses do not just avoid detection by the host immune system, which appears to be the main strategy of ensuring successful replication ; some viruses also encode proteins that function to disrupt the downstream signaling cascades at various points, preventing the establishment of an effective antiviral state when detection of the viral PAMPs has occurred. Indeed, the N protein has also been shown to interfere with the 2', 5'-oligoadenylate synthetase/RNaseL 2'-5'OAS activation that occurs downstream of IFN induction and which leads to the inhibition of global translation shutdown . This activity is in addition to its suppression of IFNβ induction through the binding of viral RNAs that prevents their detection .

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

Coronavirus-induced apoptosis during the late stages of infection is also partially regulated by the p38 MAPK signaling pathway, which in turn up-regulates production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin IL -6 and IL-8, in infected host cells and mount an immune response against virus infection in these cells . However, while pro-inflammatory cytokines are up-regulated at the transcriptional level during coronavirus infection, there is minimal to moderate up-regulation at the translational level, leading to the hypothesis that the interaction between IBV spike S protein and host eukaryotic initiation factor 3 eIF3 modulates host gene expression, especially genes involved in innate immunity that are activated during coronavirus infection . This also agrees with the hypothesis that, notwithstanding the presence of virus-induced ER stress responses, a significant decline in host mRNA translation in infected cells impedes the expression of ER stress proteins despite elevated mRNA concentrations of the former .

What is the structure of a coronavirus?

These interactions may be directly involved in viral replication or lead to the alteration of certain signaling pathways, such as cell stress response and innate immunity, to facilitate viral replication and pathogenesis. Text: Coronaviruses, together with arteriviruses and toroviruses, belong in the order Nidovirales, a group of large, non-segmented, positive sense and single stranded RNA animal viruses that produce an extensive 3'-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs for transcription during infection Table 1 . Nidoviruses such as avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus IBV , human coronavirus 229E HCoV-229E , equine arteritis virus EAV and the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome arterivirus PRRSV are important pathogens of both human and animals , and are commonly associated with mild respiratory and enteric diseases, although they are also known to cause more OPEN ACCESS critical lower respiratory tract illness, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV epidemic that occurred in 2003 .

During infection, the virus replicates in the host cytosol amidst a myriad of host signaling pathways and systems such that interaction between the virus and the host systems is inevitable. Virus infection and the consequent host cell response also involve complicated interaction between various host cellular and viral networks. Virus-host interplay occurs at multiple points during the virus replication cycle, from entry to exit.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

A cluster of pneumonia cases linked to a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV was reported by China in late December 2019. Reported case incidence has now reached the hundreds, but this is likely an underestimate. As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, we estimate the cumulative incidence in China at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 .

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, we estimate the cumulative incidence in China at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 . The most plausible number of infections is in the order of thousands, rather than hundreds, and there is a strong indication that untraced exposures other than the one in the epidemiologically linked seafood market in Wuhan have occurred. Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place .

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

In early January, the outbreak began to escalate rapidly with hundreds of cases now confirmed along with the presence of a few household clusters . As of 24 January 2020, the cumulative incidence in China is 830 cases, of which 549 cases were diagnosed in Hubei, 26 in Beijing, 20 in Shanghai, and 53 in Guangdong. Additionally, twenty-six deaths have been linked to the outbreak , and thirteen cases were exported to Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States as of 22 January 2020.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases . Although early reports from Wuhan stated that i there were only tens of cases in the cluster and ii no human-to-human transmission was directly observed, the scientific community was alert to the possibility that the novel coronavirus would spread to other geographic locations-including other countries-via direct human-to-human transmission. In early January, the outbreak began to escalate rapidly with hundreds of cases now confirmed along with the presence of a few household clusters .

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Table 1 also shows the estimated incidence in China. The first exportation event in Thailand suggests 423 cases with the upper confidence limit of 1863 cases. The estimated cumulative incidence has grown as additional cases have been reported.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

The estimated cumulative incidence has grown as additional cases have been reported. As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, the cumulative incidence in China is estimated at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 . Our latest estimate is comparable to a preliminary report posted by a research group at Imperial College London ICL on their own homepage on 22 January 2020 that estimated the incidence based on three importation events at 4000 cases 95% CI: 1000, 9700 .

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Two other estimates have also been published: a preliminary study by a Northeastern University group estimated 1250 cases 95% CI: 350, 3000 as of 17 January 2020 and a University of Hong Kong group estimated 1343 cases 95% CI: 547, 3446 as of 17 January 2020 . The former study from the United States assumes that the catchment area population is 10 million we use 11.1 million . The number of reported 2019-nCoV infections continues to grow as surveillance and detection methods improve.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Additionally, twenty-six deaths have been linked to the outbreak , and thirteen cases were exported to Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States as of 22 January 2020. Considering that enhanced surveillance has been underway in these importing countries, case ascertainment has been perhaps better in exported case data. Using a spatial back-calculation method and analyzing exported cases, we estimate the cumulative incidence of 2019-nCoV cases in China in real time, allowing us to update and discuss the extent of transmission at the source.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Such exposures are expected to include human-to-human transmission, but the levels of transmissibility have yet to be quantified. It is still plausible that a substantial number of human infections arose from animal-to-human exposures, such as was the case during the first outbreak of highly pathogenic influenza H7N9 in China, 2013, and the human-to-human transmissibility has yet to be quantified in an explicit manner. Despite initially restricting what information on the outbreak was shared publicly, the Chinese government has begun to respectfully provide updates on the situation on a daily basis.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Our latest estimate is comparable to a preliminary report posted by a research group at Imperial College London ICL on their own homepage on 22 January 2020 that estimated the incidence based on three importation events at 4000 cases 95% CI: 1000, 9700 . Possible reasons for the slight difference include i the number of travelers in the previous study was derived from airline passenger data and ii the assumed length of T was different. Two other estimates have also been published: a preliminary study by a Northeastern University group estimated 1250 cases 95% CI: 350, 3000 as of 17 January 2020 and a University of Hong Kong group estimated 1343 cases 95% CI: 547, 3446 as of 17 January 2020 .

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel. As we already know from elsewhere , given the observed cumulative count of c exported cases, we have a balance equation of the cumulative risk of infection: where T is the sum of incubation and infectious periods, and here is assumed to be 3.2 and 9.3 days , respectively, assuming that these periods are similar to those of other coronaviruses, and thus, T = 12.5 days. The estimated incidence in China is then given bypn.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Using a spatial back-calculation method and analyzing exported cases, we estimate the cumulative incidence of 2019-nCoV cases in China in real time, allowing us to update and discuss the extent of transmission at the source. Table 1 shows the incidence of exported cases by date of hospitalization and report. Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

The number of reported 2019-nCoV infections continues to grow as surveillance and detection methods improve. Our estimate and others agree that the actual number of cases is likely in the order of thousands, rather than hundreds, and there is a strong indication that untraced exposures other than that of the originally linked seafood market in Wuhan have occurred. Such exposures are expected to include human-to-human transmission, but the levels of transmissibility have yet to be quantified.

When was the a cluster of pneumonia cases were first reported ?

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Table 1 also shows the estimated incidence in China. The first exportation event in Thailand suggests 423 cases with the upper confidence limit of 1863 cases. The estimated cumulative incidence has grown as additional cases have been reported.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Our latest estimate is comparable to a preliminary report posted by a research group at Imperial College London ICL on their own homepage on 22 January 2020 that estimated the incidence based on three importation events at 4000 cases 95% CI: 1000, 9700 . Possible reasons for the slight difference include i the number of travelers in the previous study was derived from airline passenger data and ii the assumed length of T was different. Two other estimates have also been published: a preliminary study by a Northeastern University group estimated 1250 cases 95% CI: 350, 3000 as of 17 January 2020 and a University of Hong Kong group estimated 1343 cases 95% CI: 547, 3446 as of 17 January 2020 .

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

The estimated cumulative incidence has grown as additional cases have been reported. As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, the cumulative incidence in China is estimated at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 . Our latest estimate is comparable to a preliminary report posted by a research group at Imperial College London ICL on their own homepage on 22 January 2020 that estimated the incidence based on three importation events at 4000 cases 95% CI: 1000, 9700 .

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Additionally, twenty-six deaths have been linked to the outbreak , and thirteen cases were exported to Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States as of 22 January 2020. Considering that enhanced surveillance has been underway in these importing countries, case ascertainment has been perhaps better in exported case data. Using a spatial back-calculation method and analyzing exported cases, we estimate the cumulative incidence of 2019-nCoV cases in China in real time, allowing us to update and discuss the extent of transmission at the source.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

In early January, the outbreak began to escalate rapidly with hundreds of cases now confirmed along with the presence of a few household clusters . As of 24 January 2020, the cumulative incidence in China is 830 cases, of which 549 cases were diagnosed in Hubei, 26 in Beijing, 20 in Shanghai, and 53 in Guangdong. Additionally, twenty-six deaths have been linked to the outbreak , and thirteen cases were exported to Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States as of 22 January 2020.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel. As we already know from elsewhere , given the observed cumulative count of c exported cases, we have a balance equation of the cumulative risk of infection: where T is the sum of incubation and infectious periods, and here is assumed to be 3.2 and 9.3 days , respectively, assuming that these periods are similar to those of other coronaviruses, and thus, T = 12.5 days. The estimated incidence in China is then given bypn.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

The estimated incidence in China is then given bypn. With an ad-hoc assumption that the data are generated following the binomial sampling process among travelers from Wuhan, the cumulative incidence is then estimated using a maximum likelihood method. Table 1 also shows the estimated incidence in China.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, we estimate the cumulative incidence in China at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 . The most plausible number of infections is in the order of thousands, rather than hundreds, and there is a strong indication that untraced exposures other than the one in the epidemiologically linked seafood market in Wuhan have occurred. Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place .

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

A cluster of pneumonia cases linked to a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV was reported by China in late December 2019. Reported case incidence has now reached the hundreds, but this is likely an underestimate. As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, we estimate the cumulative incidence in China at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 .

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Using a spatial back-calculation method and analyzing exported cases, we estimate the cumulative incidence of 2019-nCoV cases in China in real time, allowing us to update and discuss the extent of transmission at the source. Table 1 shows the incidence of exported cases by date of hospitalization and report. Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Two other estimates have also been published: a preliminary study by a Northeastern University group estimated 1250 cases 95% CI: 350, 3000 as of 17 January 2020 and a University of Hong Kong group estimated 1343 cases 95% CI: 547, 3446 as of 17 January 2020 . The former study from the United States assumes that the catchment area population is 10 million we use 11.1 million . The number of reported 2019-nCoV infections continues to grow as surveillance and detection methods improve.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

The number of reported 2019-nCoV infections continues to grow as surveillance and detection methods improve. Our estimate and others agree that the actual number of cases is likely in the order of thousands, rather than hundreds, and there is a strong indication that untraced exposures other than that of the originally linked seafood market in Wuhan have occurred. Such exposures are expected to include human-to-human transmission, but the levels of transmissibility have yet to be quantified.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Such exposures are expected to include human-to-human transmission, but the levels of transmissibility have yet to be quantified. It is still plausible that a substantial number of human infections arose from animal-to-human exposures, such as was the case during the first outbreak of highly pathogenic influenza H7N9 in China, 2013, and the human-to-human transmissibility has yet to be quantified in an explicit manner. Despite initially restricting what information on the outbreak was shared publicly, the Chinese government has begun to respectfully provide updates on the situation on a daily basis.

What is the number of inbound passengers from China?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

The estimated incidence in China is then given bypn. With an ad-hoc assumption that the data are generated following the binomial sampling process among travelers from Wuhan, the cumulative incidence is then estimated using a maximum likelihood method. Table 1 also shows the estimated incidence in China.

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, we estimate the cumulative incidence in China at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 . The most plausible number of infections is in the order of thousands, rather than hundreds, and there is a strong indication that untraced exposures other than the one in the epidemiologically linked seafood market in Wuhan have occurred. Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place .

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Our latest estimate is comparable to a preliminary report posted by a research group at Imperial College London ICL on their own homepage on 22 January 2020 that estimated the incidence based on three importation events at 4000 cases 95% CI: 1000, 9700 . Possible reasons for the slight difference include i the number of travelers in the previous study was derived from airline passenger data and ii the assumed length of T was different. Two other estimates have also been published: a preliminary study by a Northeastern University group estimated 1250 cases 95% CI: 350, 3000 as of 17 January 2020 and a University of Hong Kong group estimated 1343 cases 95% CI: 547, 3446 as of 17 January 2020 .

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Table 1 also shows the estimated incidence in China. The first exportation event in Thailand suggests 423 cases with the upper confidence limit of 1863 cases. The estimated cumulative incidence has grown as additional cases have been reported.

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel. As we already know from elsewhere , given the observed cumulative count of c exported cases, we have a balance equation of the cumulative risk of infection: where T is the sum of incubation and infectious periods, and here is assumed to be 3.2 and 9.3 days , respectively, assuming that these periods are similar to those of other coronaviruses, and thus, T = 12.5 days. The estimated incidence in China is then given bypn.

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

The estimated cumulative incidence has grown as additional cases have been reported. As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, the cumulative incidence in China is estimated at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 . Our latest estimate is comparable to a preliminary report posted by a research group at Imperial College London ICL on their own homepage on 22 January 2020 that estimated the incidence based on three importation events at 4000 cases 95% CI: 1000, 9700 .

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Text: Since the announcement of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, was made on 31 December 2019, many rapid virological, clinical, and epidemiological research responses have taken place . The causative agent of the pneumonia is suggested to be a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV of the same lineage but genetically distinct from the coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS . Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases .

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

In early January, the outbreak began to escalate rapidly with hundreds of cases now confirmed along with the presence of a few household clusters . As of 24 January 2020, the cumulative incidence in China is 830 cases, of which 549 cases were diagnosed in Hubei, 26 in Beijing, 20 in Shanghai, and 53 in Guangdong. Additionally, twenty-six deaths have been linked to the outbreak , and thirteen cases were exported to Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States as of 22 January 2020.

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Additionally, twenty-six deaths have been linked to the outbreak , and thirteen cases were exported to Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States as of 22 January 2020. Considering that enhanced surveillance has been underway in these importing countries, case ascertainment has been perhaps better in exported case data. Using a spatial back-calculation method and analyzing exported cases, we estimate the cumulative incidence of 2019-nCoV cases in China in real time, allowing us to update and discuss the extent of transmission at the source.

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Cases in the initial cluster reported a common exposure-a seafood market in Wuhan where wild animals were served at a restaurant-indicating that a point-source zoonotic animal-to-human route was likely the main mode of transmission for those cases . Although early reports from Wuhan stated that i there were only tens of cases in the cluster and ii no human-to-human transmission was directly observed, the scientific community was alert to the possibility that the novel coronavirus would spread to other geographic locations-including other countries-via direct human-to-human transmission. In early January, the outbreak began to escalate rapidly with hundreds of cases now confirmed along with the presence of a few household clusters .

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Using a spatial back-calculation method and analyzing exported cases, we estimate the cumulative incidence of 2019-nCoV cases in China in real time, allowing us to update and discuss the extent of transmission at the source. Table 1 shows the incidence of exported cases by date of hospitalization and report. Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases.

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

The number of reported 2019-nCoV infections continues to grow as surveillance and detection methods improve. Our estimate and others agree that the actual number of cases is likely in the order of thousands, rather than hundreds, and there is a strong indication that untraced exposures other than that of the originally linked seafood market in Wuhan have occurred. Such exposures are expected to include human-to-human transmission, but the levels of transmissibility have yet to be quantified.

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

A cluster of pneumonia cases linked to a novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV was reported by China in late December 2019. Reported case incidence has now reached the hundreds, but this is likely an underestimate. As of 24 January 2020, with reports of thirteen exportation events, we estimate the cumulative incidence in China at 5502 cases 95% confidence interval: 3027, 9057 .

What percent of inbound passengers from China were from Wuhan?

Due to the initial difficulty of diagnosis in the absence of established primer for polymerase chain reaction testing, the time lag between hospitalization and reporting was longer for early cases compared with that of more recent cases. Among the seven locations reporting importation, the total volume of inbound passengers from China was m = 63.1 million per year in 2017 , of which 100q = 2.1% were from Wuhan , a home of n = 19.0 million people as the catchment population of Wuhan airport. Two other locations with confirmed cases, i.e., Macau and Hong Kong, were excluded from the analysis, because it is commutable by land transporation and the first case in Hong Kong was indeed not via airtravel.

Such exposures are expected to include human-to-human transmission, but the levels of transmissibility have yet to be quantified. It is still plausible that a substantial number of human infections arose from animal-to-human exposures, such as was the case during the first outbreak of highly pathogenic influenza H7N9 in China, 2013, and the human-to-human transmissibility has yet to be quantified in an explicit manner. Despite initially restricting what information on the outbreak was shared publicly, the Chinese government has begun to respectfully provide updates on the situation on a daily basis.

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

. Hantavirus infection affects up to 100,000 to 200,000 humans annually, with fulminant HFRS cases most represented in China . . Chinese HFRS cases, mainly caused by Hantaan virus HTNV infection, account for approximately 90% of all global cases, with a mortality rate ranging from 0.1 to 15% . .

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

IMPORTANCE Hantaviruses have attracted worldwide attention as archetypal emerging pathogens. Recently, increasing evidence has highlighted long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs as key regulators of innate immunity; however, their roles in hantavirus infection remain unknown. In the present work, a new unexplored function of lncRNA NEAT1 in controlling HTNV replication was found.

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

. Since there is neither an effective therapeutic nor FDA-licensed vaccine, further understanding of host immune responses against hantaviral infection is of great significance for global public health and safety. The innate immune system, characterized by interferon IFN responses and immunocyte activation, provides the initial defense against viral invasions.

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

1E and F and generated hantavirus progeny Fig. 1G . Similar to the data obtained from HUVECs, NEAT1 was indeed upregulated by HTNV at a multiplicity of infection MOI of 1 beginning at 24 hpi in HUVECs and A549, HEK293, and HeLa cells, and the increasing tendency occurred in a time-dependent manner Fig. 1H .

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

1D . To further investigate whether NEAT1 expression was altered in other cell lines, HEK293, HeLa, and A549 cells were used. All these cells could be infected by HTNV Fig. 1E and F and generated hantavirus progeny Fig. 1G .

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

. Considering the poor evolutionary conservation but rapid divergence of lncRNAs, their functions may be highly species and virus specific. Though considerable progress has been achieved to demonstrate the antiviral effects of lncRNAs on model viruses, there are no published reports assessing the role of lncRNAs in hantaviral infection.

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

. However, the role of NEAT1 in hantaviral infection remains unclear. In this report, NEAT1 has been identified as an important regulator of the host innate immune system against HTNV infection. Elevated NEAT1 promotes IFN secretion, most likely by enhancing RIG-I and DDX60 expression.

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized. In this study, we identified the lncRNA NEAT1 as a vital antiviral modulator. NEAT1 was dramatically upregulated after Hantaan virus HTNV infection, whereas its downregulation in vitro or in vivo delayed host innate immune responses and aggravated HTNV replication.

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

Though considerable progress has been achieved to demonstrate the antiviral effects of lncRNAs on model viruses, there are no published reports assessing the role of lncRNAs in hantaviral infection. NEAT1 has been reported to interact with Drosophila DBHS RNA-binding proteins e.g., SFPQ, NONO-p54nrb, and PSPC1 , recruiting them to paraspeckles, a nuclear substructure found in all cultured and primary cells except embryonic stem cells . .

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

RIG-I and DDX60 had synergic effects on IFN production. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that NEAT1 modulates the innate immune response against HTNV infection, providing another layer of information about the role of lncRNAs in controlling viral infections. IMPORTANCE Hantaviruses have attracted worldwide attention as archetypal emerging pathogens.

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

Text: glycoprotein GP , and viral RNA-dependent polymerase protein RdRp , respectively. Humans become infected by inhaling contaminated aerosols or by coming into contact with rodent excreta, and they develop two severe acute diseases, namely, hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome HFRS and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome HPS . .

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

Various viruses, such as influenza virus IAV , coronavirus, enterovirus, human immunodeficiency virus HIV , hepatitis B virus HBV , hepatitis C virus HCV , Japanese encephalitis virus JEV , and rabies virus, have been reported to activate the transcription of different lncRNAs in host cells 11, . . . .

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

. The roles of lncRNAs in host-virus interactions have been progressively unveiled. Various viruses, such as influenza virus IAV , coronavirus, enterovirus, human immunodeficiency virus HIV , hepatitis B virus HBV , hepatitis C virus HCV , Japanese encephalitis virus JEV , and rabies virus, have been reported to activate the transcription of different lncRNAs in host cells 11, .

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

. . . . Additionally, Huh 7.0 and Huh 7.5 RIG-I Ϫ cells used in our study have been reported to be infected by HTNV by Lee et al. . and can be used as a cell model to study immune responses against HTNV replication . . Additionally, HEK293 . and HeLa .

What plays a role in innate immunity to Hantavirus infection?

Among these noncoding RNAs ncRNAs , long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs emerged as important regulators of gene expression and are closely related to the activation of the host innate immune system. TLR2 controls lncRNA-COX2 expression in a MyD88-and NF-B-dependent manner, whereas lncRNA-COX either promotes interleukin 6 IL-6 secretion or represses ISG15 and CCL5 expression . .

. Since there is neither an effective therapeutic nor FDA-licensed vaccine, further understanding of host immune responses against hantaviral infection is of great significance for global public health and safety. The innate immune system, characterized by interferon IFN responses and immunocyte activation, provides the initial defense against viral invasions.

What plays a role in innate immunity to Hantavirus infection?

Among these noncoding RNAs ncRNAs , long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs emerged as important regulators of gene expression and are closely related to the activation of the host innate immune system. TLR2 controls lncRNA-COX2 expression in a MyD88-and NF-B-dependent manner, whereas lncRNA-COX either promotes interleukin 6 IL-6 secretion or represses ISG15 and CCL5 expression . .

Hantavirus infection, which causes zoonotic diseases with a high mortality rate in humans, has long been a global public health concern. Over the past decades, accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs play key regulatory roles in innate immunity. However, the involvement of host lncRNAs in hantaviral control remains uncharacterized.

What plays a role in innate immunity to Hantavirus infection?

Among these noncoding RNAs ncRNAs , long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs emerged as important regulators of gene expression and are closely related to the activation of the host innate immune system. TLR2 controls lncRNA-COX2 expression in a MyD88-and NF-B-dependent manner, whereas lncRNA-COX either promotes interleukin 6 IL-6 secretion or represses ISG15 and CCL5 expression . .

The above-described findings indicated that NEAT1-2 depletion might influence multiple aspects of the innate immune response in HTNV-infected mice. Innate immunity is a phylogenetically ancient and conserved system that counteracts invading microbes, the regulatory mechanism of which is sophisticated and complex. Long noncoding RNAs, which were once considered dark materials in the mammalian genome, have been shown to exert vital modulatory effects on host innate immunity .

What plays a role in innate immunity to Hantavirus infection?

Among these noncoding RNAs ncRNAs , long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs emerged as important regulators of gene expression and are closely related to the activation of the host innate immune system. TLR2 controls lncRNA-COX2 expression in a MyD88-and NF-B-dependent manner, whereas lncRNA-COX either promotes interleukin 6 IL-6 secretion or represses ISG15 and CCL5 expression . .

. However, the role of NEAT1 in hantaviral infection remains unclear. In this report, NEAT1 has been identified as an important regulator of the host innate immune system against HTNV infection. Elevated NEAT1 promotes IFN secretion, most likely by enhancing RIG-I and DDX60 expression.

What plays a role in innate immunity to Hantavirus infection?

Among these noncoding RNAs ncRNAs , long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs emerged as important regulators of gene expression and are closely related to the activation of the host innate immune system. TLR2 controls lncRNA-COX2 expression in a MyD88-and NF-B-dependent manner, whereas lncRNA-COX either promotes interleukin 6 IL-6 secretion or represses ISG15 and CCL5 expression . .

IMPORTANCE Hantaviruses have attracted worldwide attention as archetypal emerging pathogens. Recently, increasing evidence has highlighted long noncoding RNAs lncRNAs as key regulators of innate immunity; however, their roles in hantavirus infection remain unknown. In the present work, a new unexplored function of lncRNA NEAT1 in controlling HTNV replication was found.