Datasets:
annotations_creators:
- found
language_creators:
- found
language:
- en
license:
- other
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- 1M<n<10M
source_datasets:
- original
task_categories:
- image-to-text
task_ids:
- image-captioning
paperswithcode_id: conceptual-captions
pretty_name: Conceptual Captions
dataset_info:
- config_name: default
features:
- name: id
dtype: string
- name: caption
dtype: string
- name: url
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 623230370
num_examples: 3318333
- name: validation
num_bytes: 2846024
num_examples: 15840
download_size: 0
dataset_size: 626076394
- config_name: labeled
features:
- name: image_url
dtype: string
- name: caption
dtype: string
- name: labels
sequence: string
- name: MIDs
sequence: string
- name: confidence_scores
sequence: float64
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 1199325228
num_examples: 2007090
download_size: 532762865
dataset_size: 1199325228
- config_name: unlabeled
features:
- name: image_url
dtype: string
- name: caption
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 584517500
num_examples: 3318333
- name: validation
num_bytes: 2698710
num_examples: 15840
download_size: 375258708
dataset_size: 587216210
configs:
- config_name: labeled
data_files:
- split: train
path: labeled/train-*
- config_name: unlabeled
data_files:
- split: train
path: unlabeled/train-*
- split: validation
path: unlabeled/validation-*
default: true
Dataset Card for Conceptual Captions
Table of Contents
- Dataset Description
- Dataset Structure
- Dataset Creation
- Considerations for Using the Data
- Additional Information
Dataset Description
- Homepage: Conceptual Captions homepage
- Repository: Conceptual Captions repository
- Paper: Conceptual Captions: A Cleaned, Hypernymed, Image Alt-text Dataset For Automatic Image Captioning
- Leaderboard: Conceptual Captions leaderboardhttps://ai.google.com/research/ConceptualCaptions/leaderboard?active_tab=leaderboard
- Point of Contact: Conceptual Captions e-mail
Dataset Summary
Conceptual Captions is a dataset consisting of ~3.3M images annotated with captions. In contrast with the curated style of other image caption annotations, Conceptual Caption images and their raw descriptions are harvested from the web, and therefore represent a wider variety of styles. More precisely, the raw descriptions are harvested from the Alt-text HTML attribute associated with web images. To arrive at the current version of the captions, we have developed an automatic pipeline that extracts, filters, and transforms candidate image/caption pairs, with the goal of achieving a balance of cleanliness, informativeness, fluency, and learnability of the resulting captions.
Dataset Preprocessing
This dataset doesn't download the images locally by default. Instead, it exposes URLs to the images. To fetch the images, use the following code:
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
from functools import partial
import io
import urllib
import PIL.Image
from datasets import load_dataset
from datasets.utils.file_utils import get_datasets_user_agent
USER_AGENT = get_datasets_user_agent()
def fetch_single_image(image_url, timeout=None, retries=0):
for _ in range(retries + 1):
try:
request = urllib.request.Request(
image_url,
data=None,
headers={"user-agent": USER_AGENT},
)
with urllib.request.urlopen(request, timeout=timeout) as req:
image = PIL.Image.open(io.BytesIO(req.read()))
break
except Exception:
image = None
return image
def fetch_images(batch, num_threads, timeout=None, retries=0):
fetch_single_image_with_args = partial(fetch_single_image, timeout=timeout, retries=retries)
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=num_threads) as executor:
batch["image"] = list(executor.map(fetch_single_image_with_args, batch["image_url"]))
return batch
num_threads = 20
dset = load_dataset("google-research-datasets/conceptual_captions")
dset = dset.map(fetch_images, batched=True, batch_size=100, fn_kwargs={"num_threads": num_threads})
Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
image-captioning
: This dataset can be used to train model for the Image Captioning task. The leaderboard for this task is available here. Official submission output captions are scored against the reference captions from the hidden test set using this implementation of the CIDEr (primary), ROUGE-L and SPICE metrics.
Languages
All captions are in English.
Dataset Structure
Data Instances
unlabeled
Each instance in this configuration represents a single image with a caption:
{
'image_url': 'http://lh6.ggpht.com/-IvRtNLNcG8o/TpFyrudaT6I/AAAAAAAAM6o/_11MuAAKalQ/IMG_3422.JPG?imgmax=800',
'caption': 'a very typical bus station'
}
labeled
Each instance in this configuration represents a single image with a caption with addtional machine-generated image labels and confidence scores:
{
'image_url': 'https://thumb1.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/261388/223876810/stock-vector-christmas-tree-on-a-black-background-vector-223876810.jpg',
'caption': 'christmas tree on a black background .',
'labels': ['christmas tree', 'christmas decoration', 'font', 'text', 'graphic design', 'illustration','interior design', 'tree', 'christmas eve', 'ornament', 'fir', 'plant', 'pine', 'pine family', 'graphics'],
'MIDs': ['/m/025nd', '/m/05fc9mj', '/m/03gq5hm', '/m/07s6nbt', '/m/03c31', '/m/01kr8f', '/m/0h8nzzj', '/m/07j7r', '/m/014r1s', '/m/05ykl4', '/m/016x4z', '/m/05s2s', '/m/09t57', '/m/01tfm0', '/m/021sdg'],
'confidence_scores': [0.9818305373191833, 0.952756941318512, 0.9227379560470581, 0.8524878621101379, 0.7597672343254089, 0.7493422031402588, 0.7332468628883362, 0.6869218349456787, 0.6552258133888245, 0.6357356309890747, 0.5992692708969116, 0.585474967956543, 0.5222904086112976, 0.5113164782524109, 0.5036579966545105]
}
Data Fields
unlabeled
image_url
: Static URL for downloading the image associated with the post.caption
: Textual description of the image.
labeled
image_url
: Static URL for downloading the image associated with the post.caption
: Textual description of the image.labels
: A sequence of machine-generated labels obtained using the Google Cloud Vision API.MIDs
: A sequence of machine-generated identifiers (MID) corresponding to the label's Google Knowledge Graph entry.confidence_scores
: A sequence of confidence scores denoting how likely the corresponing labels are present on the image.
Data Splits
unlabeled
The basic version of the dataset split into Training and Validation splits. The Training split consists of 3,318,333 image-URL/caption pairs and the Validation split consists of 15,840 image-URL/caption pairs.
labeled
The labeled version of the dataset with a single. The entire data is contained in Training split, which is a subset of 2,007,090 image-URL/caption pairs from the Training set of the unlabeled
config.
Dataset Creation
Curation Rationale
From the paper:
In this paper, we make contributions to both the data and modeling categories. First, we present a new dataset of caption annotations Conceptual Captions (Fig. 1), which has an order of magnitude more images than the COCO dataset. Conceptual Captions consists of about 3.3M himage, descriptioni pairs. In contrast with the curated style of the COCO images, Conceptual Captions images and their raw descriptions are harvested from the web, and therefore represent a wider variety of styles.
Source Data
Initial Data Collection and Normalization
From the homepage:
For Conceptual Captions, we developed a fully automatic pipeline that extracts, filters, and transforms candidate image/caption pairs, with the goal of achieving a balance of cleanliness, informativeness, fluency, and learnability of the resulting captions. Because no human annotators are involved, the Conceptual Captions dataset generation process is highly scalable.
To generate this dataset, we started with a Flume pipeline that processes billions of Internet webpages, extracting, filtering, and processing candidate image and caption pairs, and keeping those that pass through several filters.
We first screen for certain properties like size, aspect ratio, adult content scores. These filters discard more than 65% of the candidates. Next, we use Alt-Texts for text-based filtering, removing captions with non-descriptive text (such as SEO tags or hashtags); we also discard texts with high sentiment polarity or adult content scores, resulting in just 3% of the incoming candidates passing through.
In the next step, we filter out candidates for which none of the text tokens can be mapped to the visual content of the image. We use image classifiers (e.g., Google Cloud Vision APIs) to assign class labels to images and match these labels against the candidate text (allowing morphological transformations), discarding >around 60% of the candidates that reach this stage.
The candidates passing the above filters tend to be good Alt-text image descriptions. However, a large majority of these use proper names (for people, venues, locations, etc.), brands, dates, quotes, etc. This creates two distinct problems. First, some of these cannot be inferred based on the image pixels alone. This is problematic because unless the image has the necessary visual information it is not useful for training. Second, even if the proper names could be inferred from the image it is extremely difficult for a model to learn to perform both fine-grained classification and natural-language descriptions simultaneously. We posit that if automatic determination of names, locations, brands, etc. is needed, it should be done as a separate task that may leverage image meta-information (e.g. GPS info), or complementary techniques such as OCR.
We address the above problems with the insight that proper names should be replaced by words that represent the same general notion, i.e., by their concept. For example, we remove locations (“Crowd at a concert in Los Angeles“ becomes “Crowd at a concert”), names (e.g., “Former Miss World Priyanka Chopra on the red carpet” becomes “actor on the red carpet”), proper noun modifiers (e.g., “Italian cuisine” becomes just “cuisine”) and noun phrases (e.g., “actor and actor” becomes “actors”). Around 20% of the samples are discarded during this transformation because it can leave sentences too short, or otherwise inconsistent.
Finally, we perform another round of filtering to identify concepts with low-count. We cluster all resolved entities (e.g., “actor”, “dog”, “neighborhood”, etc.) and keep only the candidate types which have a count of over 100 mentions. This retains around 16K entity concepts such as: “person”, “actor”, “artist”, “player” and “illustration”. The less frequent ones that we dropped include “baguette”, “bridle”, “deadline”, “ministry” and “funnel”.
Who are the source language producers?
Not specified.
Annotations
Annotation process
Annotations are extracted jointly with the images using the automatic pipeline.
Who are the annotators?
Not specified.
Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
Considerations for Using the Data
Social Impact of Dataset
[More Information Needed]
Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
Additional Information
Dataset Curators
Piyush Sharma, Nan Ding, Sebastian Goodman and Radu Soricut.
Licensing Information
The dataset may be freely used for any purpose, although acknowledgement of Google LLC ("Google") as the data source would be appreciated. The dataset is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.
Citation Information
@inproceedings{sharma2018conceptual,
title = {Conceptual Captions: A Cleaned, Hypernymed, Image Alt-text Dataset For Automatic Image Captioning},
author = {Sharma, Piyush and Ding, Nan and Goodman, Sebastian and Soricut, Radu},
booktitle = {Proceedings of ACL},
year = {2018},
}
Contributions
Thanks to @abhishekkrthakur and @mariosasko for adding this dataset.