nitibench / README.md
tann9949
update README.md
2e3cb57
|
raw
history blame
6.32 kB
metadata
license: cc
task_categories:
  - sentence-similarity
  - text-generation
tags:
  - legal
  - RAG
  - LCLM
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: ccl
        path: data/nitibench-ccl.parquet
      - split: tax
        path: data/nitibench-tax.parquet

πŸ‘©πŸ»β€βš–οΈ NitiBench: A Thai Legal Benchmark for RAG

[πŸ“„ Technical Report]

This dataset provides the test data for evaluating LLM frameworks, such as RAG or LCLM. The benchmark consists of two datasets:

πŸ›οΈ NitiBench-CCL

Derived from the WangchanX-Legal-ThaiCCL-RAG Dataset, our version includes an additional preprocessing step in which we separate the reasoning process from the final answer. The dataset contains 35 pieces of legislation related to Corporate and Commercial Law (CCL). Information about the 35 pieces of legislation is provided in the table below:

Legislation Legal Terminology Training Test
Organic Act on Counter Corruption, B.E. 2561 organic law βœ“
Civil and Commercial Code code βœ“ βœ“
Revenue Code code βœ“ βœ“
Accounting Act, B.E. 2543 act βœ“ βœ“
Accounting Profession Act, B.E. 2547 act βœ“ βœ“
Act on Disciplinary Offenses of Government Officials Performing Duties in Agencies Other than Government Agencies, B.E. 2534 act βœ“
Act on Offences of Officials Working in State Agencies or Organizations, B.E. 2502 act βœ“
Act on Offences Relating to Registered Partnerships, Limited Partnerships, Companies Limited, Associations and Foundations, B.E. 2499 act βœ“ βœ“
Act on the Establishment of Government Organizations, B.E. 2496 act βœ“
Act on the Management of Shares and Stocks of Ministers, B.E. 2543 act βœ“
Act Repealing the Agricultural Futures Trading Act, B.E. 2542 B.E. 2558 act βœ“
Budget Procedure Act, B.E. 2561 act βœ“
Business Registration Act, B.E. 2499 act βœ“ βœ“
Chamber of Commerce Act, B.E. 2509 act βœ“ βœ“
Derivatives Act, B.E. 2546 act βœ“ βœ“
Energy Conservation Promotion Act, B.E. 2535 act βœ“ βœ“
Energy Industry Act, B.E. 2550 act βœ“ βœ“
Financial Institutions Business Act, B.E. 2551 act βœ“ βœ“
Fiscal Discipline Act, B.E. 2561 act βœ“
Foreign Business Act, B.E. 2542 act βœ“ βœ“
Government Procurement and Supplies Management Act, B.E. 2560 act βœ“
National Economic and Social Development Act, B.E. 2561 act βœ“
Petroleum Income Tax Act, B.E. 2514 act βœ“ βœ“
Provident Fund Act, B.E. 2530 act βœ“ βœ“
Public Limited Companies Act, B.E. 2535 act βœ“ βœ“
Secured Transactions Act, B.E. 2558 act βœ“ βœ“
Securities and Exchange Act, B.E. 2535 act βœ“ βœ“
State Enterprise Capital Act, B.E. 2542 act βœ“
State Enterprise Committee and Personnel Qualifications Standards Act, B.E. 2518 act βœ“
State Enterprise Development and Governance Act, B.E. 2562 act βœ“
State Enterprise Labor Relations Act, B.E. 2543 act βœ“
Trade Association Act, B.E. 2509 act βœ“ βœ“
Trust for Transactions in Capital Market Act, B.E. 2550 act βœ“ βœ“
Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses, B.E. 2561 emergency decree βœ“
Emergency Decree on Special Purpose Juristic Person for Securitization, B.E. 2540 emergency decree βœ“ βœ“

The training split of nitibench-ccl can be found in the WangchanX-Legal-ThaiCCL-RAG dataset.

Data Format

Each data point contains four columns:

  • question: str β€” A question relevant to the relevant_laws.
  • answer: str β€” The answer to the question based on the relevant_laws, provided without the reasoning steps.
  • relevant_laws: List[Dict[str, str]] β€” A list of relevant laws that should be used as context when answering the question.
  • reference_answer: str β€” The original answer generated by an LLM, which has been revised and edited by legal experts to include both the reasoning steps and the final answer.

Formally, given the data triple ((q, T={p_1, p_2, \dots, p_K}, y)), (q) represents the question, (T) represents relevant_laws, and (y) represents the answer.

Data Curation

Using the notation described above, the data was curated as follows:

  1. Queries ((q)) and answers ((y)) were manually crafted by legal experts based on a single section sampled from the legal texts of the 35 pieces of legislation.
  2. For each data triple ((q, T, y)), the manually crafted question was carefully quality-assured by a second legal expert.

Thus, for the test data, there is only one positive per query ((|T|=1)). The diagram below shows how the test data was collected.

ccl-test

πŸ’Έ NitiBench-Tax

This subset provides a question, relevant laws, and an answer for each data point. Instead of having legal experts manually craft the questions, we scraped the data from a reliable source: the Revenue Department Website. This subset contains Tax Ruling Cases officially provided by the Revenue Department since 2021. As a result, this subset is considerably more challenging, as it requires extensive legal reasoning both for searching for relevant documents and for generating the answer. The data collection procedure is illustrated in the figure below:

tax-test

Data Format

This split uses the same format as described in the NitiBench-CCL split.

Contact

For any inquiries or concerns, please reach out to us via email: Chompakorn Chaksangchaichot.

Citation



Sponsored by VISAI Logo VISTEC Logo

License