| Prompt: | |
| Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details: | |
| - CASE: Crime No. 1027 of 2015 | |
| - DISTRICT: Not available | |
| - BAIL APPLICATION: Not available | |
| --- | |
| Output: | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B) of 2016 | |
| Maharunnisha aged about 50 years wife of Mohd. Muslim | |
| resident of Vikas Colony, Meera Bhawan, (Purani Diwani | |
| Dahilamau), Police Station – Kotwali Nagar, District – | |
| Pratapgarh | |
| .....Applicant | |
| (In Jail from 14.11.2015) | |
| Versus | |
| State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| .....Opposite Party | |
| Case Crime No. 1027 of 2015 | |
| U/s 302, 120B I.P.C. | |
| P.S. – Kotwali Nagar | |
| District – Pratapgarh | |
| Bail application rejected by the | |
| ADJ, Pratapgarh on 02.12.2015 | |
| APPLICATION FOR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 Cr. P.C. | |
| The applicant most respectfully submits as under:- | |
| For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying | |
| affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this | |
| Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the bail | |
| to the applicant in the interest of Justice. | |
| Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh) | |
| Advocate | |
| Dated : .2016 Counsel for the applicant | |
| Case Crime No. 1027 of 2015 | |
| U/s 302, 120B I.P.C. | |
| P.S. – Kotwali Nagar | |
| District – Pratapgarh | |
| Bail application rejected by the | |
| ADJ, Pratapgarh on 02.12.2015 | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 | |
| Maharunnisha ...Applicant | |
| (In Jail from 14.11.2015) | |
| Versus | |
| State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party | |
| AFFIDAVIT | |
| (In support of bail application) | |
| I, Fatima Bano aged about 25 years daughter of Mohd. | |
| Muslim resident of House No. 103, Purani Divani, | |
| Dahilamau, District – Pratapgarh , Religion – Muslim, | |
| Education – Literate, Occupation – Studding, do hereby | |
| solemnly affirm and state on oath as under :- | |
| That the deponent is the daughter of the | |
| 1. | |
| applicant and duly authorized by the applicant to | |
| file the aforesaid application before this | |
| Hon'ble Court and as such she is fully conversant | |
| with the facts of the case and deposed as under. | |
| The ID Proof of the deponent is enclosed and her | |
| photograph is affixed on the affidavit. | |
| That this is the first bail application before | |
| 2. | |
| this Hon'ble Court. No any other bail application | |
| pending before this Hon'ble Court or rejected by | |
| this Hon'ble Court. | |
| That brief facts of the case is that a first | |
| 3. | |
| information report has been lodged against the | |
| unknown persons on 30.10.2015 at 01:30 PM by the | |
| informant namely Smt. Kanchan Shukla under | |
| section 302 I.P.C. at Police Station – Kotwali | |
| Nagar, District – Pratapgarh as the husband of | |
| the informant namely Indramani Shukal | |
| (hereinafter referred to as deceased) has | |
| murdered by unknown persons on 29.10.2015 about | |
| 08.00 PM. The photocopy of the first information | |
| report dated 30.10.2015 is being annexed as | |
| Annexure No. 01 to this application. | |
| That as per first information report, the alleged | |
| 4. | |
| incident took place on 29.10.2015 about 08:00 | |
| P.M. and the first information report was lodged | |
| next day i.e. 30.10.2015 about 01:30 PM i.e. | |
| after 17:30 hours of the alleged incident without | |
| explanation of any delay while the distance | |
| between the incident place and police station is | |
| only 5 Kilometers and the deceased was famous | |
| lawyer of the District Pratapgarh. | |
| That according to the first information report on | |
| 5. | |
| 29.10.2015 about 07:00 PM four came to the home | |
| of the deceased and asked from the informant | |
| about deceased. Thereafter about 08:15 the | |
| milkman of the informant informed her as about | |
| 200 miters of the home one injured person was | |
| therein in car and car is similar as yours. Then | |
| the informant and other residents run to the | |
| incident place where they found the deceased was | |
| injured. He was brought to the hospital but he | |
| was declared as dead. | |
| That the post mortem has been conducted on the | |
| 6. | |
| deceased body on 30.10.2015 about 12.30PM in | |
| District Hospital, District – Pratapgarh. | |
| Photo/type copies of the post mortem report dated | |
| 30.10.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 02 to | |
| this application. | |
| That the concerned police recorded the statement | |
| 7. | |
| of the informant under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. on | |
| 30.10.2015 in which the informant repeated the | |
| contents of the first information report in | |
| another manner but the sole of the first | |
| information report has not been changed ever. The | |
| type copy of the statement of the informant dated | |
| 30.10.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 03 to | |
| this application. | |
| That the applicant has no concerned with the | |
| 8. | |
| murder of the deceased in any manner as alleged | |
| by the concerned police and allegation against | |
| the applicant under section 120B IPC. | |
| That on 11.11.2015 the informant moved an | |
| 9. | |
| application before the investigating officer to | |
| given information in regard to murder of deceased | |
| wherein she alleged against the applicant as | |
| being advocate the deceased charged free Rs. | |
| 50000/- for bail and due to failure of the | |
| obtaining bail order for sons of the applicant, | |
| the applicant demanded her money and also | |
| threatened for life to deceased. Similar to above | |
| application the junior of the deceased namely | |
| Tauseef Ahamad also given an application before | |
| the investigating officer on 12.11.2015. The | |
| photo/type copy of the application dated | |
| 11.11.2015 & 12.11.2015 are being annexed as | |
| Annexure No. 04 to this application. | |
| That on basis of the application dated 11.11.2015 | |
| 10. | |
| of the informant the concerned police recorded | |
| her further statement on 12.11.2015 and on basis | |
| of the further statement of the informant the | |
| Section 120B has been added in said case crime. | |
| The type copy of the further statement of the | |
| informant is being annexed as Annexure No. 05 to | |
| this application. | |
| That in perusal of the further statement of the | |
| 11. | |
| informant and another application dated | |
| 12.11.2015 moved by the junior of the deceased | |
| are pre-planned for showing implication of the | |
| applicant’s name in the said case crime. | |
| That if any life threats given by the applicant | |
| 12. | |
| as alleged against her then why not deceased and | |
| anyone who knows that, not informed to the | |
| concerned police before the murder of the | |
| deceased. | |
| That neither the applicant has motive nor has any | |
| 13. | |
| motive been assigned to him to commit the crime | |
| in question with which the applicant has no | |
| concerned in any manner. | |
| That the name of the applicant came in light in | |
| 14. | |
| said case crime due undue influence of the local | |
| advocates of the District Pratapgarh and the | |
| concerned police also showing the good work after | |
| false implication of the applicant in the said | |
| case crime. | |
| That earlier the first information report was | |
| 15. | |
| registered 4 unknown persons but later on, on the | |
| basis of the application dated 11.11.2015 of the | |
| informant the applicant has also been made | |
| accused in the present case. | |
| That there is no credible evidence on record | |
| 16. | |
| which could show that the applicant is guilty or | |
| committed the crime in question and the evidence | |
| available on record itself show that no prima- | |
| facie offence under section 302, 120B I.P.C. is | |
| made out against the applicant. | |
| That the applicant has no motive to commit the | |
| 17. | |
| alleged crime and false motive which given in | |
| case, is cooked and fabricated by the concerned | |
| police. | |
| That since the applicant has not committed any | |
| 18. | |
| offence as alleged but he has been falsely | |
| implicated in the case by the informant in | |
| malafide intention. | |
| That no any involvement in the said case as | |
| 19. | |
| alleged in first information report, the | |
| applicant has no reason to murder the deceased. | |
| That the applicant moved bail application bearing | |
| 20. | |
| No. 1760 of 2015 before Additional Sessions | |
| Judge, Court No. 4, Pratapgarh and his bail | |
| application has been rejected by the court | |
| concerned on 02.12.2015. Certified copy of the | |
| bail rejection order dated 02.12.2015 is being | |
| annexed as Annexure No. 06 to this application. | |
| That the applicant in jail since 14.11.2015. | |
| 21. | |
| That there is no chance of the applicant | |
| 22. | |
| absconding or tempering with the prosecution | |
| witnesses. | |
| That the applicant is ready to furnished the | |
| 23. | |
| security and bond and also undertake that he will | |
| be never misused liberty of bail. | |
| That in view of the above, it would be expedient | |
| 24. | |
| and necessary in the interest of justice that the | |
| applicant be enlarged on bail during pendency of | |
| case. | |
| Lucknow | |
| Date : .01.2016 Deponent | |
| VERIFICATION | |
| I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the | |
| contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are | |
| true to my personal knowledge. No part of its is false | |
| and nothing material has been concealed. So, help me | |
| “GOD”. | |
| Lucknow | |
| Date : .01.2016 Deponent | |
| I, identify the deponent on the basis of the record | |
| produced by the deponent, who has signed before me. | |
| Advocate | |
| Solemnly affirmed before me on | |
| at A.M./P.M. by the deponent, who has been | |
| identified by Sri Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Advocate, High | |
| Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrollment No. 8078 of | |
| 2011, resident Nigohan, Lucknow. Mobile No. 8004776600 | |
| I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent | |
| that she understands the contents of this affidavit, | |
| which have been read over and explained by me. | |
| OATH | |
| COMMISSIONER | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 | |
| Maharunnisha ...Applicant | |
| (In Jail from 14.11.2015) | |
| Versus | |
| State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party | |
| INDEX | |
| Sr.No | |
| Particulars Page No. | |
| Application for bail under section | |
| 439 Cr.P.C. | |
| 1. | |
| Affidavit in support of | |
| 2. | |
| application | |
| Annexure No. 1 | |
| 3. | |
| The photocopy of the first | |
| information report dated | |
| 30.10.2015 | |
| Annexure No. 2 | |
| 4. | |
| Photo/type copies of the post | |
| mortem report dated 30.10.2015 | |
| Annexure No. 3 | |
| 5. | |
| The type copy of the statement of | |
| the informant dated 30.10.2015 | |
| Annexure No. 4 | |
| 6. | |
| The photo/type copy of the | |
| application dated 11.11.2015 & | |
| 12.11.2015 | |
| Annexure No. 5 | |
| 7. | |
| The type copy of the further | |
| statement of the informant dated | |
| 12.11.2015 | |
| Annexure No. 6 | |
| 8. | |
| Certified copy of the bail | |
| rejection order dated 02.12.2015 | |
| Memo | |
| 9. | |
| Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh) | |
| Advocate | |
| Dated : .01.2016 Counsel for the applicant | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 | |
| Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Annexure No. 4 | |
| lsok esa] | |
| Jheku Fkkuk/;{k egksn;] | |
| dksrokyh uxj] izrkix< | |
| egksn;] | |
| fuosnu gS fd fnukad 29-10-2015 dks esjs ifr ds gR;k | |
| gq;h FkhA ml le; lnesa esa Fkh blfy, eqdnek fy[kkrs le; | |
| lgh ckr vki dks crk ugha ikbZ lPpkbZ ;g gS fd O;kikjh | |
| egknso dsljokuh dh gR;k esa tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh | |
| tekur djkus o eqdnesa ls esg:ufu”kk iRuh Lo0 eks0 | |
| eqfLye fuokfluh ehjk Hkou izrkix< tks tsy esa can | |
| eqfYteksa dh eka gS dk uke eqdnesa ls fudyokus ds fy, | |
| 50 gtkj :i;s Qhl ds :i esa fn;s FksA uke eqdnesa ls u | |
| fudyok ikus o tekur u djok ikus ds dkj.k dbZ ckj essjs ifr | |
| ls esg:ufu”kk dh dgk lquh gq;h FkhA esg:ufu”kk us dgk | |
| fd tc ge O;kikjh }kjk iSlk u nsus ij mls ejok ldrh gWw rks | |
| rqe fdl [ksr dh ewyh gksA rqEgkjs tSls odhy esjs tsc esa | |
| iMs jgrs gSA iqfyl ds idMs tkus ds Mj ls vkB nl fnu bl ? | |
| kVuk ls igys gekjs ?kj ds cjkens esa viuh yMdh fguk ds | |
| lkFk jgh FkhA mlds ckn gkd Vkd gksus ds ckn o mlds | |
| /kedh nsus ds ckn mls Hkxk fn;k FkkA eq>s iw.kZ fo”okl | |
| gS fd mlh us lwVjksa ls esjs ifr dh gR;k djk nh gSA | |
| fnukad 29-10-2015 djok pkSFk ds fnu lka;dky nks eksVj | |
| lkbfdyksa ls nks pkj yksx esjs ifr dks ?kj ij iwNus vk;s | |
| FksA lkeus vkus ij eSa mUgsa igpku ldrh gWwA vki ls | |
| fuosnu gS fd esjh ,Q vkbZ vkj esa bls Hkh lfEefyr dj ds | |
| dk;Zokgh dh tk,A | |
| izkfFkZuh | |
| Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh bUnzef.k | |
| “kqDyk | |
| fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj | |
| 11.11.2015 | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 | |
| Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Annexure No. 4 | |
| lsok esa] | |
| Jheku izHkkjh fujh{kd | |
| Dksrokyh uxj] izrkix< | |
| egksn;] | |
| fuosnu gS fd eSa rkSlhQ vgen lqr ekschu vgen | |
| fuoklh xzke xkch egqvcu Fkkuk ykyxat izrkix< dk fuoklh | |
| gWw is”ks ls eSa vf/koDrk gWwA ftyk U;k;ky; izrkix< esa | |
| odkyr djrk gWw U;k;ky; esa esjs lhfu;j Lo0 bUnzef.k | |
| “kqDyk Fks mUgha ds lkFk eSa dke djrk Fkk U;k;ky; esa | |
| lhfu;j dh tks Qkbys eqdnesa ls lacaf/kr Fkh mUgsa eSa | |
| tkurk Fkk eq0v0la0 512@15 ftlesa eg:ufu”kk o mlds | |
| yMds vfHk;qDr FksA ftudh iSjoh gekjs lhfu;j Lo0 | |
| bUnzef.k “kqDyk dj jgs FksA eg:ufu”kk us eqdnesa esa | |
| viuk uke fudyokus o yMdksa dh tekur o eqdnesa iSjoh | |
| djus gsrq crkSj Qhl 50000@& :0 fn;k Fkk fdUrq eqdnesa | |
| ls u gh eg:ufu”kk dk uke fudy ik;k u yMds “kehe o lyeku | |
| dh tekur ek0 l= U;k;ky; ls fnukad 04-08-2015 dks [kkfjt | |
| gks x;hA bl ckr dks ysdj eg:ufu”kk mlds yMds odhy lkgc | |
| ls ukjkt py jgs Fks o eg:yfu”kk viuk iSlk ekax jgh FkhA | |
| blh ckr dks ysdj dbZ ckj eg:yfu”kk o esjs lhfu;j bUnzef.k | |
| “kqDyk ds chp dgk lquh gq;h Fkh blds yMds “kkfrj | |
| vijk/kh gS budh /kedh ls odhy lkgc tcjtLr ijs”kku Fks rFkk | |
| iwNus ij ;gh dgk djrs Fks fd blds yMds “kkfrj vijk/kh gS | |
| rFkk mudk “kkfrj vijkf/k;ksa ls muds laca/k gSA vkSj esjs | |
| lkFk dqN Hkh djk ldrs gSaA mijksDr rF;ksa ls Lor% Li’V | |
| gS fd eg:ufu”kk dh lkft”k ls esjs lhfu;j dh gR;k gq;h gSA | |
| izkFkhZ rkSlhQ vgen] lqr ekschu vgen | |
| fuoklh xkch egqvkcu Fkkuk ykyxat] tuin izrkix< | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 | |
| Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Annexure No. 5 | |
| 12-11-2015 | |
| ethn c;ku okfnuh %& Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh Lo0 | |
| bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dks0 uxj] tuin | |
| izrkix< us iwNus ij crk;k fd eSaus ;g izkFkZuk i= viuh | |
| LosPNk ls fn;k Fkk fdlh ds dgus ;k tksj ncko ls ugha fn;k | |
| gSA cfYd eq>s tks lgh tkudkjh Fkh og Lo;a fy[kdj vkidks | |
| nsus Fkkus x;h Fkh vkids u feyus o dkQh bUrtkj djus ds | |
| ckn Fkkuk dk;kZy; esa nsdj okil pyh vk;h FkhA izk0 i= | |
| lqudj x;k x;k ftlesa fy[kk gS fd lsok esa Jheku Fkkuk/;{k | |
| egksn; dksrokyh uxj] izrkix< egksn;] fuosnu gS fd | |
| fnukad 29-10-2015 dks esjs ifr ds gR;k gq;h FkhA ml le; | |
| lnesa esa Fkh blfy, eqdnek fy[kkrs le; lgh ckr vki dks crk | |
| ugha ikbZ lPpkbZ ;g gS fd O;kikjh egknso dsljokuh dh | |
| gR;k esa tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh tekur djkus o | |
| eqdnesa ls esg:ufu”kk iRuh Lo0 eks0 eqfLye fuokfluh | |
| ehjk Hkou izrkix< tks tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh eka gS | |
| dk uke eqdnesa ls fudyokus ds fy, 50 gtkj :i;s Qhl ds :i | |
| esa fn;s FksA uke eqdnesa ls u fudyok ikus o tekur u | |
| djok ikus ds dkj.k dbZ ckj essjs ifr ls esg:ufu”kk dh dgk | |
| lquh gq;h FkhA esg:ufu”kk us dgk fd tc ge O;kikjh }kjk | |
| iSlk u nsus ij mls ejok ldrh gWw rks rqe fdl [ksr dh ewyh | |
| gksA rqEgkjs tSls odhy esjs tsc esa iMs jgrs gSA iqfyl ds | |
| idMs tkus ds Mj ls vkB nl fnu bl ?kVuk ls igys gekjs ?kj ds | |
| cjkens esa viuh yMdh fguk ds lkFk jgh FkhA mlds ckn | |
| gkd Vkd gksus ds ckn o mlds /kedh nsus ds ckn mls | |
| Hkxk fn;k FkkA eq>s iw.kZ fo”okl gS fd mlh us lwVjksa ls | |
| esjs ifr dh gR;k djk nh gSA fnukad 29-10-2015 djok | |
| pkSFk ds fnu lka;dky nks eksVj lkbfdyksa ls nks pkj yksx | |
| esjs ifr dks ?kj ij iwNus vk;s FksA lkeus vkus ij eSa | |
| mUgsa igpku ldrh gWwA vki ls fuosnu gS fd esjh ,Q | |
| vkbZ vkj esa bls Hkh lfEefyr dj ds dk;Zokgh dh tk,A | |
| izkfFkZuh Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh bUnzef.k “kqDyk | |
| fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj 11.11.2015A izk0 i= | |
| esa fyf[kr ,d ,d “kCn dks lquus ds mijkUr crk;k fd ;g tks | |
| eSaus vkidks viuk fyf[kr c;ku fn;k gS ogh esjk c;ku gSA | |
| blh ij dk;Zokgh djasA ;g eSaus tks ns[kk gS rFkk vius | |
| dkuksa ls lquk gS o tks esjs ifr us tc oks ftUnk Fks tks | |
| crk;s gS ogh fy[kk gSA | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 | |
| Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Annexure No. 3 | |
| 30-10-2015 | |
| ethn c;ku okfnuh %& Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh Lo0 | |
| bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dks0 uxj] izrkix< | |
| eks0 ua0 9794920297 us iwNus ij cnfj;k¶r crk;k fd essjs | |
| ifr Jh bUnzef.k “kqDyk dpsgjh izrkix< esa vf/koDrk FksA | |
| fnukad 29-10-2015 dks le; yxHkx 07-00 cts “kke dks nks | |
| eks0lk0 ls 4 yMds eqag cka/k dj esjs ?kj cMuiqj vk;s Fks | |
| ftuesa ls nks yMdks us eq> ls iwNk fd HkkHkh th HkS;k | |
| fdrus cts rd vk;sxsaA okdh nksuksa vU; yMds viuh | |
| lkbfdy ij ckgj [kMs FksA fnukad 29-10-15 dks le; yxHkx | |
| 08-15 cts esjk nwf/k;k jketh ;kno fuoklh xkze cMuiqj | |
| AQqyofj;kA vk;k crk;k fd jkLrs esa ?kj ls mRrj esa yxHkx | |
| 200 ehVj Qqyofj;k ds ikl esu jksM ij lMd ds fdukjs ,d | |
| lQsn jax dh dkj gSA ftlesa ,d O;fDr ?kk;y iMk gSA tSls vki | |
| dh dkj gSA mlh rjg dh dkj ogka [kMh gSA rHkh eSa | |
| eqgYys ds yksxksa ds lkFk mDr LFkku ij x;h rks ns[kk fd | |
| esjs ifr ds ekFks ij cnek”kksa us xksyh ekj fn;k gSA tks fd | |
| ?kk;y voLFkk esa Mªkbfoax lhV ij iMs FksA ;g ?kVuk 29- | |
| 10-2015 le; djhc 08-00 cts jkf= dh gSA eSa rqjUr eqgYys | |
| okyksa ds lkFk vius ifr dks ftyk vLirky ysdj x;h tgka ij | |
| MkDVjksa us esjs ifr dks e`r ?kksf’kr dj fn;kA mDr ?kVuk | |
| dks vkus tkus okys yksxksa us ?kVuk dks viuh vka[kksa | |
| ls ns[kk gSA ftls esa irk yxkdj vkidks ckn esa crkÅaxhA | |
| esjs ifr dh gR;k mDr pkjksa vKkr O;fDr;ksa us xksyh ekj | |
| dh dkfjr fy;k gSA | |