File size: 28,519 Bytes
2b7e388 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 |
Prompt:
Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details:
- CASE: Crime No. 1027 of 2015
- DISTRICT: Not available
- BAIL APPLICATION: Not available
---
Output:
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Criminal Misc. Case No. (B) of 2016
Maharunnisha aged about 50 years wife of Mohd. Muslim
resident of Vikas Colony, Meera Bhawan, (Purani Diwani
Dahilamau), Police Station – Kotwali Nagar, District –
Pratapgarh
.....Applicant
(In Jail from 14.11.2015)
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh
.....Opposite Party
Case Crime No. 1027 of 2015
U/s 302, 120B I.P.C.
P.S. – Kotwali Nagar
District – Pratapgarh
Bail application rejected by the
ADJ, Pratapgarh on 02.12.2015
APPLICATION FOR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 Cr. P.C.
The applicant most respectfully submits as under:-
For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying
affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this
Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the bail
to the applicant in the interest of Justice.
Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh)
Advocate
Dated : .2016 Counsel for the applicant
Case Crime No. 1027 of 2015
U/s 302, 120B I.P.C.
P.S. – Kotwali Nagar
District – Pratapgarh
Bail application rejected by the
ADJ, Pratapgarh on 02.12.2015
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016
Maharunnisha ...Applicant
(In Jail from 14.11.2015)
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party
AFFIDAVIT
(In support of bail application)
I, Fatima Bano aged about 25 years daughter of Mohd.
Muslim resident of House No. 103, Purani Divani,
Dahilamau, District – Pratapgarh , Religion – Muslim,
Education – Literate, Occupation – Studding, do hereby
solemnly affirm and state on oath as under :-
That the deponent is the daughter of the
1.
applicant and duly authorized by the applicant to
file the aforesaid application before this
Hon'ble Court and as such she is fully conversant
with the facts of the case and deposed as under.
The ID Proof of the deponent is enclosed and her
photograph is affixed on the affidavit.
That this is the first bail application before
2.
this Hon'ble Court. No any other bail application
pending before this Hon'ble Court or rejected by
this Hon'ble Court.
That brief facts of the case is that a first
3.
information report has been lodged against the
unknown persons on 30.10.2015 at 01:30 PM by the
informant namely Smt. Kanchan Shukla under
section 302 I.P.C. at Police Station – Kotwali
Nagar, District – Pratapgarh as the husband of
the informant namely Indramani Shukal
(hereinafter referred to as deceased) has
murdered by unknown persons on 29.10.2015 about
08.00 PM. The photocopy of the first information
report dated 30.10.2015 is being annexed as
Annexure No. 01 to this application.
That as per first information report, the alleged
4.
incident took place on 29.10.2015 about 08:00
P.M. and the first information report was lodged
next day i.e. 30.10.2015 about 01:30 PM i.e.
after 17:30 hours of the alleged incident without
explanation of any delay while the distance
between the incident place and police station is
only 5 Kilometers and the deceased was famous
lawyer of the District Pratapgarh.
That according to the first information report on
5.
29.10.2015 about 07:00 PM four came to the home
of the deceased and asked from the informant
about deceased. Thereafter about 08:15 the
milkman of the informant informed her as about
200 miters of the home one injured person was
therein in car and car is similar as yours. Then
the informant and other residents run to the
incident place where they found the deceased was
injured. He was brought to the hospital but he
was declared as dead.
That the post mortem has been conducted on the
6.
deceased body on 30.10.2015 about 12.30PM in
District Hospital, District – Pratapgarh.
Photo/type copies of the post mortem report dated
30.10.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 02 to
this application.
That the concerned police recorded the statement
7.
of the informant under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. on
30.10.2015 in which the informant repeated the
contents of the first information report in
another manner but the sole of the first
information report has not been changed ever. The
type copy of the statement of the informant dated
30.10.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 03 to
this application.
That the applicant has no concerned with the
8.
murder of the deceased in any manner as alleged
by the concerned police and allegation against
the applicant under section 120B IPC.
That on 11.11.2015 the informant moved an
9.
application before the investigating officer to
given information in regard to murder of deceased
wherein she alleged against the applicant as
being advocate the deceased charged free Rs.
50000/- for bail and due to failure of the
obtaining bail order for sons of the applicant,
the applicant demanded her money and also
threatened for life to deceased. Similar to above
application the junior of the deceased namely
Tauseef Ahamad also given an application before
the investigating officer on 12.11.2015. The
photo/type copy of the application dated
11.11.2015 & 12.11.2015 are being annexed as
Annexure No. 04 to this application.
That on basis of the application dated 11.11.2015
10.
of the informant the concerned police recorded
her further statement on 12.11.2015 and on basis
of the further statement of the informant the
Section 120B has been added in said case crime.
The type copy of the further statement of the
informant is being annexed as Annexure No. 05 to
this application.
That in perusal of the further statement of the
11.
informant and another application dated
12.11.2015 moved by the junior of the deceased
are pre-planned for showing implication of the
applicant’s name in the said case crime.
That if any life threats given by the applicant
12.
as alleged against her then why not deceased and
anyone who knows that, not informed to the
concerned police before the murder of the
deceased.
That neither the applicant has motive nor has any
13.
motive been assigned to him to commit the crime
in question with which the applicant has no
concerned in any manner.
That the name of the applicant came in light in
14.
said case crime due undue influence of the local
advocates of the District Pratapgarh and the
concerned police also showing the good work after
false implication of the applicant in the said
case crime.
That earlier the first information report was
15.
registered 4 unknown persons but later on, on the
basis of the application dated 11.11.2015 of the
informant the applicant has also been made
accused in the present case.
That there is no credible evidence on record
16.
which could show that the applicant is guilty or
committed the crime in question and the evidence
available on record itself show that no prima-
facie offence under section 302, 120B I.P.C. is
made out against the applicant.
That the applicant has no motive to commit the
17.
alleged crime and false motive which given in
case, is cooked and fabricated by the concerned
police.
That since the applicant has not committed any
18.
offence as alleged but he has been falsely
implicated in the case by the informant in
malafide intention.
That no any involvement in the said case as
19.
alleged in first information report, the
applicant has no reason to murder the deceased.
That the applicant moved bail application bearing
20.
No. 1760 of 2015 before Additional Sessions
Judge, Court No. 4, Pratapgarh and his bail
application has been rejected by the court
concerned on 02.12.2015. Certified copy of the
bail rejection order dated 02.12.2015 is being
annexed as Annexure No. 06 to this application.
That the applicant in jail since 14.11.2015.
21.
That there is no chance of the applicant
22.
absconding or tempering with the prosecution
witnesses.
That the applicant is ready to furnished the
23.
security and bond and also undertake that he will
be never misused liberty of bail.
That in view of the above, it would be expedient
24.
and necessary in the interest of justice that the
applicant be enlarged on bail during pendency of
case.
Lucknow
Date : .01.2016 Deponent
VERIFICATION
I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the
contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are
true to my personal knowledge. No part of its is false
and nothing material has been concealed. So, help me
“GOD”.
Lucknow
Date : .01.2016 Deponent
I, identify the deponent on the basis of the record
produced by the deponent, who has signed before me.
Advocate
Solemnly affirmed before me on
at A.M./P.M. by the deponent, who has been
identified by Sri Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Advocate, High
Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrollment No. 8078 of
2011, resident Nigohan, Lucknow. Mobile No. 8004776600
I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent
that she understands the contents of this affidavit,
which have been read over and explained by me.
OATH
COMMISSIONER
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016
Maharunnisha ...Applicant
(In Jail from 14.11.2015)
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party
INDEX
Sr.No
Particulars Page No.
Application for bail under section
439 Cr.P.C.
1.
Affidavit in support of
2.
application
Annexure No. 1
3.
The photocopy of the first
information report dated
30.10.2015
Annexure No. 2
4.
Photo/type copies of the post
mortem report dated 30.10.2015
Annexure No. 3
5.
The type copy of the statement of
the informant dated 30.10.2015
Annexure No. 4
6.
The photo/type copy of the
application dated 11.11.2015 &
12.11.2015
Annexure No. 5
7.
The type copy of the further
statement of the informant dated
12.11.2015
Annexure No. 6
8.
Certified copy of the bail
rejection order dated 02.12.2015
Memo
9.
Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh)
Advocate
Dated : .01.2016 Counsel for the applicant
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016
Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
Annexure No. 4
lsok esa]
Jheku Fkkuk/;{k egksn;]
dksrokyh uxj] izrkix<
egksn;]
fuosnu gS fd fnukad 29-10-2015 dks esjs ifr ds gR;k
gq;h FkhA ml le; lnesa esa Fkh blfy, eqdnek fy[kkrs le;
lgh ckr vki dks crk ugha ikbZ lPpkbZ ;g gS fd O;kikjh
egknso dsljokuh dh gR;k esa tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh
tekur djkus o eqdnesa ls esg:ufu”kk iRuh Lo0 eks0
eqfLye fuokfluh ehjk Hkou izrkix< tks tsy esa can
eqfYteksa dh eka gS dk uke eqdnesa ls fudyokus ds fy,
50 gtkj :i;s Qhl ds :i esa fn;s FksA uke eqdnesa ls u
fudyok ikus o tekur u djok ikus ds dkj.k dbZ ckj essjs ifr
ls esg:ufu”kk dh dgk lquh gq;h FkhA esg:ufu”kk us dgk
fd tc ge O;kikjh }kjk iSlk u nsus ij mls ejok ldrh gWw rks
rqe fdl [ksr dh ewyh gksA rqEgkjs tSls odhy esjs tsc esa
iMs jgrs gSA iqfyl ds idMs tkus ds Mj ls vkB nl fnu bl ?
kVuk ls igys gekjs ?kj ds cjkens esa viuh yMdh fguk ds
lkFk jgh FkhA mlds ckn gkd Vkd gksus ds ckn o mlds
/kedh nsus ds ckn mls Hkxk fn;k FkkA eq>s iw.kZ fo”okl
gS fd mlh us lwVjksa ls esjs ifr dh gR;k djk nh gSA
fnukad 29-10-2015 djok pkSFk ds fnu lka;dky nks eksVj
lkbfdyksa ls nks pkj yksx esjs ifr dks ?kj ij iwNus vk;s
FksA lkeus vkus ij eSa mUgsa igpku ldrh gWwA vki ls
fuosnu gS fd esjh ,Q vkbZ vkj esa bls Hkh lfEefyr dj ds
dk;Zokgh dh tk,A
izkfFkZuh
Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh bUnzef.k
“kqDyk
fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj
11.11.2015
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016
Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
Annexure No. 4
lsok esa]
Jheku izHkkjh fujh{kd
Dksrokyh uxj] izrkix<
egksn;]
fuosnu gS fd eSa rkSlhQ vgen lqr ekschu vgen
fuoklh xzke xkch egqvcu Fkkuk ykyxat izrkix< dk fuoklh
gWw is”ks ls eSa vf/koDrk gWwA ftyk U;k;ky; izrkix< esa
odkyr djrk gWw U;k;ky; esa esjs lhfu;j Lo0 bUnzef.k
“kqDyk Fks mUgha ds lkFk eSa dke djrk Fkk U;k;ky; esa
lhfu;j dh tks Qkbys eqdnesa ls lacaf/kr Fkh mUgsa eSa
tkurk Fkk eq0v0la0 512@15 ftlesa eg:ufu”kk o mlds
yMds vfHk;qDr FksA ftudh iSjoh gekjs lhfu;j Lo0
bUnzef.k “kqDyk dj jgs FksA eg:ufu”kk us eqdnesa esa
viuk uke fudyokus o yMdksa dh tekur o eqdnesa iSjoh
djus gsrq crkSj Qhl 50000@& :0 fn;k Fkk fdUrq eqdnesa
ls u gh eg:ufu”kk dk uke fudy ik;k u yMds “kehe o lyeku
dh tekur ek0 l= U;k;ky; ls fnukad 04-08-2015 dks [kkfjt
gks x;hA bl ckr dks ysdj eg:ufu”kk mlds yMds odhy lkgc
ls ukjkt py jgs Fks o eg:yfu”kk viuk iSlk ekax jgh FkhA
blh ckr dks ysdj dbZ ckj eg:yfu”kk o esjs lhfu;j bUnzef.k
“kqDyk ds chp dgk lquh gq;h Fkh blds yMds “kkfrj
vijk/kh gS budh /kedh ls odhy lkgc tcjtLr ijs”kku Fks rFkk
iwNus ij ;gh dgk djrs Fks fd blds yMds “kkfrj vijk/kh gS
rFkk mudk “kkfrj vijkf/k;ksa ls muds laca/k gSA vkSj esjs
lkFk dqN Hkh djk ldrs gSaA mijksDr rF;ksa ls Lor% Li’V
gS fd eg:ufu”kk dh lkft”k ls esjs lhfu;j dh gR;k gq;h gSA
izkFkhZ rkSlhQ vgen] lqr ekschu vgen
fuoklh xkch egqvkcu Fkkuk ykyxat] tuin izrkix<
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016
Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
Annexure No. 5
12-11-2015
ethn c;ku okfnuh %& Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh Lo0
bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dks0 uxj] tuin
izrkix< us iwNus ij crk;k fd eSaus ;g izkFkZuk i= viuh
LosPNk ls fn;k Fkk fdlh ds dgus ;k tksj ncko ls ugha fn;k
gSA cfYd eq>s tks lgh tkudkjh Fkh og Lo;a fy[kdj vkidks
nsus Fkkus x;h Fkh vkids u feyus o dkQh bUrtkj djus ds
ckn Fkkuk dk;kZy; esa nsdj okil pyh vk;h FkhA izk0 i=
lqudj x;k x;k ftlesa fy[kk gS fd lsok esa Jheku Fkkuk/;{k
egksn; dksrokyh uxj] izrkix< egksn;] fuosnu gS fd
fnukad 29-10-2015 dks esjs ifr ds gR;k gq;h FkhA ml le;
lnesa esa Fkh blfy, eqdnek fy[kkrs le; lgh ckr vki dks crk
ugha ikbZ lPpkbZ ;g gS fd O;kikjh egknso dsljokuh dh
gR;k esa tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh tekur djkus o
eqdnesa ls esg:ufu”kk iRuh Lo0 eks0 eqfLye fuokfluh
ehjk Hkou izrkix< tks tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh eka gS
dk uke eqdnesa ls fudyokus ds fy, 50 gtkj :i;s Qhl ds :i
esa fn;s FksA uke eqdnesa ls u fudyok ikus o tekur u
djok ikus ds dkj.k dbZ ckj essjs ifr ls esg:ufu”kk dh dgk
lquh gq;h FkhA esg:ufu”kk us dgk fd tc ge O;kikjh }kjk
iSlk u nsus ij mls ejok ldrh gWw rks rqe fdl [ksr dh ewyh
gksA rqEgkjs tSls odhy esjs tsc esa iMs jgrs gSA iqfyl ds
idMs tkus ds Mj ls vkB nl fnu bl ?kVuk ls igys gekjs ?kj ds
cjkens esa viuh yMdh fguk ds lkFk jgh FkhA mlds ckn
gkd Vkd gksus ds ckn o mlds /kedh nsus ds ckn mls
Hkxk fn;k FkkA eq>s iw.kZ fo”okl gS fd mlh us lwVjksa ls
esjs ifr dh gR;k djk nh gSA fnukad 29-10-2015 djok
pkSFk ds fnu lka;dky nks eksVj lkbfdyksa ls nks pkj yksx
esjs ifr dks ?kj ij iwNus vk;s FksA lkeus vkus ij eSa
mUgsa igpku ldrh gWwA vki ls fuosnu gS fd esjh ,Q
vkbZ vkj esa bls Hkh lfEefyr dj ds dk;Zokgh dh tk,A
izkfFkZuh Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh bUnzef.k “kqDyk
fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj 11.11.2015A izk0 i=
esa fyf[kr ,d ,d “kCn dks lquus ds mijkUr crk;k fd ;g tks
eSaus vkidks viuk fyf[kr c;ku fn;k gS ogh esjk c;ku gSA
blh ij dk;Zokgh djasA ;g eSaus tks ns[kk gS rFkk vius
dkuksa ls lquk gS o tks esjs ifr us tc oks ftUnk Fks tks
crk;s gS ogh fy[kk gSA
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016
Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
Annexure No. 3
30-10-2015
ethn c;ku okfnuh %& Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh Lo0
bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dks0 uxj] izrkix<
eks0 ua0 9794920297 us iwNus ij cnfj;k¶r crk;k fd essjs
ifr Jh bUnzef.k “kqDyk dpsgjh izrkix< esa vf/koDrk FksA
fnukad 29-10-2015 dks le; yxHkx 07-00 cts “kke dks nks
eks0lk0 ls 4 yMds eqag cka/k dj esjs ?kj cMuiqj vk;s Fks
ftuesa ls nks yMdks us eq> ls iwNk fd HkkHkh th HkS;k
fdrus cts rd vk;sxsaA okdh nksuksa vU; yMds viuh
lkbfdy ij ckgj [kMs FksA fnukad 29-10-15 dks le; yxHkx
08-15 cts esjk nwf/k;k jketh ;kno fuoklh xkze cMuiqj
AQqyofj;kA vk;k crk;k fd jkLrs esa ?kj ls mRrj esa yxHkx
200 ehVj Qqyofj;k ds ikl esu jksM ij lMd ds fdukjs ,d
lQsn jax dh dkj gSA ftlesa ,d O;fDr ?kk;y iMk gSA tSls vki
dh dkj gSA mlh rjg dh dkj ogka [kMh gSA rHkh eSa
eqgYys ds yksxksa ds lkFk mDr LFkku ij x;h rks ns[kk fd
esjs ifr ds ekFks ij cnek”kksa us xksyh ekj fn;k gSA tks fd
?kk;y voLFkk esa Mªkbfoax lhV ij iMs FksA ;g ?kVuk 29-
10-2015 le; djhc 08-00 cts jkf= dh gSA eSa rqjUr eqgYys
okyksa ds lkFk vius ifr dks ftyk vLirky ysdj x;h tgka ij
MkDVjksa us esjs ifr dks e`r ?kksf’kr dj fn;kA mDr ?kVuk
dks vkus tkus okys yksxksa us ?kVuk dks viuh vka[kksa
ls ns[kk gSA ftls esa irk yxkdj vkidks ckn esa crkÅaxhA
esjs ifr dh gR;k mDr pkjksa vKkr O;fDr;ksa us xksyh ekj
dh dkfjr fy;k gSA
|