text
stringlengths 22
2.01M
|
|---|
In light of numerous construction delays, increased sponsor contributions,
unusual central bank exposures etc. we would like to conduct a comprehensive
review of our insurance coverages for the Cuiaba I Project. I am availble
at your convenience to begin meeting for the exchange of info which will be
required to fulfill this endeavor. I will be the point person on behalf of
the project. My Assistant, Blanca Bollom can make all of the meeting
arrangements. Please let us know who should attend. |
This is fine for me.
"Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]> on 12/11/2000 05:27:54 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Mahaffey, Tom"
<[email protected]>, "Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: OPIC questions regarding spur pipelines at Kp 75 and kp362
how is Friday at 12:30 am EST for our ECA call. Tom M. is tied up until
12:30 or so on Friday. Frank - is this too late for you?
Mary
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 01:20
PM ---------------------------
Heather Choate
11/01/2000 12:07 PM
To: Jessica White/NA/Enron@Enron, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wes
Dempsey/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa McOmber/NA/Enron@ENRON, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin Brady/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Evans/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Shelly Mendel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jan Sutherland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brandee
Jackson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tammy Gilmore/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tammy
Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet De La
Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Performance Management Process Overview
Please plan to attend a meeting that will provide an overview of the
Performance Management Process at Enron to those new hires that arrived in
Logistics after our Mid Year Performance Process.
This meeting will be held during lunch...
Monday, November 6, 2000
from 11:30am to 1pm in EB30c2
(lunch will be provided)
Please RSVP for lunch.
Thanks! Heather Choate, x33278
|
Carrie: sounds good. We can meet anytime between 1:00 and 4:00. Just let
me know. Thanks. |
Cliff,
Did we ever produce this? I thought we decided to wait and see if we were
going to use bonds. If it exists, is there any reason why a potential buyer
of Cuiaba should not see it?
Tracee - There is documentation on the KFW hedge as you know. The only thing
we could provide on the OPIC loan is a requirement of the lenders to be fixed
which would be in the CTA if it was required in this instance (or the other
OPIC documents). It could be that the only requirement was in the OPIC FOGA
which originally required us to be fixed within 12 months of funding.
However, we modified this and now we must select either a Citibank bank loan
which would be fixed prior to funding by a swap or if we issue bonds they
will be fixed rate. Please see FOGA.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/17/2001 04:06 PM
---------------------------
Richard A Lammers
01/17/2001 03:32 PM
To: Tracee Bersani@EES
cc: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Description of Interest Rate Hedging for Petrobras sale
Just a reminder that I need you to describe the interest rate hedging in
place for the KFW and OPIC loans.Petrobras has asked for these agreements and
Rob said there are no agreements in place so we need to provide a written
description of the arrangements in lieu of the agreements.
In addition we were asked to provide a copy of the Citibank offering memo for
the OPIC bonds if one exists
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 01/21/2000 10:23
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 01/20/2000 06:11:23 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Downloads Direct Tipsheet 1.20.00
Hey music fans! There's new downloads fresh today! Yum:
Aimee Mann - graceful, pretty and nominated for a Golden Globe (NEW!)
Smashing Pumpkins - Billy and James return to their hard-rock roots
Vent - listen for these guys on modern rock radio real soon (NEW!)
Counting Crows - 2 spirited live tracks: Rain King and Angels of the Silences
Ice Cube - a true party track from one of South Central's finest
Bjork - ethereal track from Being John Malkovitch
Elliott Smith - rare B-side from the best guy-with-guitar songwriter around
Get 'em while they're crisp and juicy at
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633ky033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuC
z
More yum, featured on our genre pages:
Electronic: Distortionbomb, Vincy, DJ Allstar, DJ Edel, Boo Maga, K-Rad (NEW!)
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633kz033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuC
z
Hip Hop/R&B: Self Scientific, Anthem (NEW!)
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633k_033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuC
z
Pop: Chimera Project, Mularkee, Prey for Raine, Ajatano, Darwins Waiting Room
(NEW!)
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633k$033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuC
z
Rock: Hydrofoil, Rebreather, Bonita Down$, Shudderbug (NEW!)
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633l0033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuC
z
Alternative: Scarnella (Carla and Nels from the Geraldine Fibbers), Black
Rebel Motorcycle Club, Haywood, Kris Woolsey, Low, Juno, Bjork, Wasabi
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633l1033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuC
z
Upload your broken heart:
For Valentine's Day, we want your love songs (and love-gone-wrong songs)!
Whether he makes you feel like a natural woman or, like J. Geils, you think
Love Stinks, upload your love song mp3s to the UBL. You'll be up for our
Valentine's Day special. Get the upload lowdown here:
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633l2033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuC
z
If you don't want to learn about new uploads when they hit the Downloads
Direct street, you can unsubscribe here:
http://news.artistdirect.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=633l334C833kw48I3l01200mnu9W
nuCz
Please do not remove this tracking code
annmn:[633kw033kw48I3l01200mnu9WnuCz]
|
Pete,
The F/M relief sited may not apply in all instances because technically we
may have failed to preserve our rights by not notifying Furnas for 6 months.
They have responded as such although they have not assessed any penalties to
date. The real test is may 4 when we are supposed to be in Phase 3 on Gas.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/17/2001 04:27 PM
---------------------------
Christiaan Huizer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/17/2001 02:04 PM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Celso Bernardi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafael
Rangel/NA/Enron@Enron, Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Lucio Reis/SA/Enron@Enron, John
Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Period after commissioning on oil - PPA availability penalties
vs. diesel cost exposure
Pete,
There are two types of penalties under the PPA for the account of EPE (the
latter can be used as a hedge to diesel cost exposure and we don't have any
penalties right now)
(1) Delay penalties in being unable to provide the guaranteed capacity of 480
MW on gas starting May 4, 2001 (this is where the Force Majeure extension is
able to provide relief). The penalties here are calculated as R$ 400 per
delayed MW per day.
(2) Penalties due to capacity shortfall (basically - are we able to meet
dispatch requests). If the moving average of the monthly average of the
projects equivalent availability, calculated in accordance with provisions of
annex-7 of the PPA, is less than 92%, a penalty shall be assessed in the
amount of monthly capacity portion of the tariff for each phase times the
guaranteed capacity for the phase multiplied by (92% - moving average of the
monthly availability).
Penalties type (1) does not apply in the concept analyzed as it relates to
delay in gas (Force Majeure Claim issue).
Refusing a dispatch request above 220 MW has an impact on penalties type (2)
(guaranteed capacity is 300 MW). Given that the plant currently has a moving
average of the monthly availability of about 99.7%, there is a margin built
up that can be used to accept an availability hit by refusing a dispatch
request above 220 MW. Therefore, to avoid the huge fuel costs associated with
being dispatched above 220 MW, the PPA availability penalty concept can be
utilized as an alternative. If we continue to decline to be dispatched above
220 MW for a long period however, the built up margin will be reduced and
eventually we'll have to pay penalties because the 12-month moving average
moves below 92%.
Please let me know if additional questions
Christiaan
Peter E Weidler@ENRON
01/17/2001 09:41 AM
To: Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Celso
Bernardi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G
Gay/NA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafael
Rangel/NA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Felipe
Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose Lucio
Reis/SA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/SA/Enron@Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
[email protected]@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Period after commissioning on oil - PPA availability penalties
vs. diesel cost exposure
Why do we have penalties - I thought we had force majuere extension until
september or so.
Christiaan - please clarify thanks
Pete
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 08:52
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Rebecca W Cantrell 12/14/99 05:07 PM
To: Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth
Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barend
VanderHorst/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Coates/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A Reminder -- 2000 GRI Surcharges
Effective 1/1/00............
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99
05:03 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Rebecca W Cantrell 11/10/99 05:39 PM
To: Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth
Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Walker/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: 2000 GRI Surcharges
Just a reminder that the GRI surcharges will go down for all member pipelines
a bit effective 1/1/99, per the Settlement approved by FERC in April, 1998.
Here are the rates through 2004:
Rates (cents per Dth)
1999
2000
2001
2001
2003
2004
Commodity 0.75 0.72 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.0
High Demand* 23.0 20.0 9.0 6.0 5.0 0.0
Low Demand* 14.2 12.3 5.5 3.7 3.1 0.0
Small Customer 1.8 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.0
*refers to high load factor or low load factor customers.
|
I am happy to sign but I'm not technically in the ESA chain anymore. My
understanding is that Britaldo has assumed this role. If it will expedite
things and Ben will accept my signatrure then I can sign. I don't want to
step on anyone's toes.
Bruce Harris
12/20/2000 08:18 AM
To: Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Kent
Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Rule 144 restrictions
Kent, I copied you on this email.
Rob, David suggested that you might be able to complete the Global Finance
section. I have tried to complete it as best as I could, please call me with
any questions (30950). I need this today please.
Regards, Bruce
Bruce Harris
12/20/2000 07:38 AM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Rule 144 restrictions
Well, it alerts people that we are coming UNLESS we change the name of our
company (which gives us some protection)
Robert, how long would it take to change the name of Enron Brazil Power
Holdings XII to say, "Holdings XII"? Theresa, would that be much effort to
change our name in our brokerage account?
If it does not take too long, lets change it. And before we send out this
notice, please letJoe and I know the day that is going to be sent (ie, after
we get the DASH signed etc).
Joe--I have more info coming your way pursuant to your voicemail.
Regards, Bruce
Joe Kishkill
12/19/2000 06:35 PM
To: Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Rule 144 restrictions
so selling now (at least restricted now) leaves a nice public audit trail
that we are exiting the position?
Robert H George
12/19/2000 03:40 PM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Rule 144 restrictions
After talking with Bruce about the filing that is required under Rule 144, he
suggested that I remind you of this requirement as well. This filing is made
with the SEC and any exchange over which the shares are traded and is
available to the public. It must be filed concurrently with our sell order
to our broker. Among other things, the filing identifies, the seller, the
issuer, the broker, and the number of shares to be sold. I have gone back
and confirmed that if we wait the full two years (ie, June 24, 2001), we do
not have to make this filing.
|
Jana: I have set up an interview for ttomorrow afternoon with Mason. I will
let you know how it goes. Thanks for the help. |
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 03:16
PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 07/23/2000 06:25:52 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: August Calendar in WordPerfect
This is the calendar, in WordPerfect. . .
- AUGCAL~1.WPD
|
Thank you Frank.
I am preparing the written version now and hope to have it today.
"Kluesener, Frank" <[email protected]> on 01/31/2001 08:41:32 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'Boehm, Barbara'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Cuiaba - various
Rob,
we talked yesterday about a couple of thinks, one of which was the interest
rate reservation. To this end I am still not clear with our treasury about
the amount it would cost, if you would not use our refinancing. I am afraid
that I will need some more time to discuss this with our treasury.
In terms of the points we discussed in Washington we would very much
appreciate receiving your concrete requests in writing (gas, Furnas consent,
Eletrobras consent / guarantee), since parts of these issues have to be
internally discussed within OPIC and KfW / Hermes in order to respond in a
reliable way.
Best regards, Frank
|
This looks pretty administrative. Are we required to send this to the banks?
If so please proceed, Christian.
Gabriela Aguilar
01/05/2001 06:55 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Yabog Amendment - Letter to SIRESE
Rob,
I want to fax you the letter mentioned down below. Could you give me your fax
number ?
Thanks, gaby
---------------------- Forwarded by Gabriela Aguilar/SA/Enron on 01/05/2001
09:55 AM ---------------------------
Richard A Lammers
01/04/2001 03:52 PM
To: Gabriela Aguilar/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Federico Cerisoli/SA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Yabog Amendment - Letter to SIRESE
this looks fine to me. Please sure that Christiaan,Rob and I receive final
copies for forwarding to the banks
Gabriela Aguilar
01/04/2001 02:10 PM
To: Federico Cerisoli/SA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Yabog Amendment - Letter to SIRESE
Find attached the english version of the letter (in spanish) that Transredes
sent to SIRESE. 99% of the letter sent to SIRESE reflects Dean%s draft.
Transredes only made slight changes.
Now we are waiting for SIRESE%s confirmation to the meeting.
- Carta SIRESE-RespuestaTBStrd.doc
Regards,
gaby
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000 03:20
PM ---------------------------
Matthew Lenhart
03/10/2000 01:24 PM
To: Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Jokes
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------
"DARRAH, SHAWN" <[email protected]> on 03/10/2000 08:09:56 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, Alex Schott <[email protected]>,
Beth Holladay <[email protected]>, Brad Rodrigue <[email protected]>,
Brandon Cambre <[email protected]>, Brian Maziarz <[email protected]>,
Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacques Peltier <[email protected]>, Kenny Kilinski
<[email protected]>, Larry Centola <[email protected]>, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Missy Tassin <[email protected]>, Mitch Marcantel <[email protected]>,
Ryan Casey <[email protected]>, Tim Blanchard <[email protected]>, Tim
Dietz <[email protected]>, Val Generes <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Jokes
Here are some one-liners for people to enjoy, maybe you've heard them but
I'm a BIG Rodney fan.
Bu-bye
Rodney Dangerfield's Material...
_______________________________________
I was so poor growing up...If I wasn't born a boy.... I'd have nothing to
play with.
A girl phoned me the other day and said .... "Come on over, there's nobody
home." I went over. Nobody was home.
During sex, my girlfriend always wants to talk to me. Just the other night
she called me from a hotel.
One day as I came home early from work ..... I saw a guy jogging naked. I
said to the guy .... "Hey buddy, why are you doing that?" He said,
"Because you came home early."
Its been a rough day. I got up this morning ... put on a shirt and a
button fell off. I picked up my briefcase, and the handle came off. I'm
afraid
to go to the bathroom.
I was such an ugly kid........When I played in the sandbox the cat kept
covering me up.
I could tell that my parents hated me. My bath toys were a toaster and a
radio.
I was such an ugly baby ... My mother never breast fed me. She told me
that she only liked me as a friend.
I'm so ugly ... My father carries around the picture of the kid who came
with his wallet.
When I was born .... the doctor came out to the waiting room and said to my
father "I'm very sorry.......We did everything we could......But he pulled
through."
I'm so ugly ... My mother had morning sickness.......AFTER I was born.
I remember the time I was kidnapped and they sent a piece of my finger to
my father. He said he wanted more proof.
Once when I was lost ..... I saw a policeman and asked him to help me find
my parents. I said to him .... "Do you think we'll ever find them?" He said
"I don't know kid ... there are so many places they can hide."
My wife made me join a bridge club. I jump off next Tuesday.
I'm so ugly ... I worked in a pet shop, and people kept asking how big I'd
get.
I went to see my doctor. "Doctor, every morning when I get up and look in
the mirror, I feel like throwing up. What's wrong with me?" He said "I
don't know but your eyesight is perfect."
I went to the doctor because I'd swallowed a bottle of sleeping pills. My
doctor told me to have a few drinks and get some rest.
|
Bob: here is our status from this mornings outage event.
NWPL: we were able to manually input 80% of next days nominations. Since we
were not able to EDI, we will have to manually input all successive
nominations for the day, as well as all actual scheduled volumes in Unify.
We were also only able to get in our 80% of nominations with NWPL's help, as
they extended the nomination deadline for us. The other 20% of next day
business will be nominated as an intra-day.
El Paso: basically the same as NWPL.. We were able to manually get in 100%
of nominations, but only because El Paso kept their system open an extra hour
for us.
Let me know if you need aything else. Thanks. |
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/02/2001 06:19 AM
---------------------------
"Bill Deets" <[email protected]> on 02/02/2001 09:56:59 AM
Please respond to "Bill Deets" <[email protected]>
To: "Diana Gallagher" <[email protected]>
cc: "ROB GAY" <[email protected]>
Subject:
?
- 1403 OCEANSIDE DMQ FOR ELECTRIC EXTRAS REVISED 1-26-01.xls
- BILLS MEMO on gay residence revision #2 -01-26-01.doc
|
We will need to craft a response
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:20 AM
---------------------------
[email protected] on 02/14/2001 09:43:16 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations
Rob - We've reviewed your memo which sets forth general points of your
negotiations with Siemens. Following are comments and questions regarding
certain negotiated points:
EOT Claim Agreement
Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on oil;
if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning
obligations
We observe that while this point places reasonable responsibility on the Owner
to correct problems that were a result of their commercial operations, it is
introduces an opportunity for the Contractor to place unfounded blame on the
owner for affecting the Contractor's ability to commission.
Risk of Loss remains with owner during commissioning on gas
We understand that the Facility is under the care, custody and control of the
Owner and that the Facility is currently operating under the insurance
coverage
intended for the commercial operating period (versus the construction period).
Please confirm that there is no reason to be concerned about insurance
coverage
if a problem arises resulting in material damage attributable to Contractor
action during commissioning on gas. We are also advising the Lenders to have
this point reviewed by an insurance advisor.
Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning
During our last conference call it was indicated that the first choice was to
test to determine degradation and the alternative was to agree on a set of
curves. It appears that Siemens was unwilling to agree to the test approach.
We observe that the curves used to determine owner credit may be biased to the
benefit of Siemens. We trust that your operations experts will diligently
review the basis for the curves.
Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven by
owner
Please explain the rationale behind forgiving $4 million of Contractor LDs.
Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas
During our last conference call it was indicated that there would be a stand
down until 7/1/01 when gas is available, no LDs would be paid related to oil
firing performance, and that the LD clock would start if gas commissioning is
not complete within 60 days. We do not understand the above negotiated point.
Please confirm that our understanding is correct or clarify your negotiated
point.
TAA Agreement
No 12-month look back.
We assume that this negotiated point is related to the time period factored
into
the availability calculation for purposes of determining whether or not an
extension or additional work by the Contractor has been triggered as a result
of
dropping below the availability standards. Please explain how this negotiated
point affects the mechanics of the TAA and also please explain how
availability
will be calculated. As we noted during our last conference call, we are
concerned that Siemens believes that the availability value is not reduced if
maintenance work is being performed during periods when the Facility is not
being dispatched.
12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.
We interpret the above negotiated point to mean that the 12-month clock for
the
initial guarantee period stops during commissioning regardless of how long it
takes the Contractor to commission on gas (unless delays are attributable to
Owner) and re-starts after Contractor has successfully completed the
performance
testing on gas. Please confirm that our understanding is correct.
In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if
there are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has indicated
that we will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business
interruption insurance when we go operational on gas. This should solve
the issue over the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects,
design, and workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc.
Incidentally, for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which
is not a new technology designation. The duration of BI coverage is 18
months per event with US$150,000 deductible.
Stone & Webster is advising the Lenders to have an insurance advisor review
this
point.
Thanks in advance for your response. Hope all is well.
Regards,
Bradley
|
I don't know if you heard but I resigned on Friday, but I will be around
until Feb. 28. My plan is to retire for a while. I have attached a picture
of a cabinet I made to give you an idea of how I will be keeping my hands
busy. You know what they say - "Idle hands are the devil's workshop".
Beija
Rob
|
Toni: please make the offer to Josh Chapa asap. Thanks. |
Phillip: I'm working on getting the official list. We should have it
sometime this afternoon. |
Do we have an English version of the expert opinion concerning the Eletrabras
guarantee that I can be reviewing? I would like to present this along with
the other things to the lenders next week. |
Brad, is there a time this week when you can do a conf. call to cover these
questions?
Please advise.
Regards,
Rob
[email protected] on 02/14/2001 09:43:16 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations
Rob - We've reviewed your memo which sets forth general points of your
negotiations with Siemens. Following are comments and questions regarding
certain negotiated points:
EOT Claim Agreement
Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on oil;
if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning
obligations
We observe that while this point places reasonable responsibility on the Owner
to correct problems that were a result of their commercial operations, it is
introduces an opportunity for the Contractor to place unfounded blame on the
owner for affecting the Contractor's ability to commission.
Risk of Loss remains with owner during commissioning on gas
We understand that the Facility is under the care, custody and control of the
Owner and that the Facility is currently operating under the insurance
coverage
intended for the commercial operating period (versus the construction period).
Please confirm that there is no reason to be concerned about insurance
coverage
if a problem arises resulting in material damage attributable to Contractor
action during commissioning on gas. We are also advising the Lenders to have
this point reviewed by an insurance advisor.
Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning
During our last conference call it was indicated that the first choice was to
test to determine degradation and the alternative was to agree on a set of
curves. It appears that Siemens was unwilling to agree to the test approach.
We observe that the curves used to determine owner credit may be biased to the
benefit of Siemens. We trust that your operations experts will diligently
review the basis for the curves.
Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven by
owner
Please explain the rationale behind forgiving $4 million of Contractor LDs.
Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas
During our last conference call it was indicated that there would be a stand
down until 7/1/01 when gas is available, no LDs would be paid related to oil
firing performance, and that the LD clock would start if gas commissioning is
not complete within 60 days. We do not understand the above negotiated point.
Please confirm that our understanding is correct or clarify your negotiated
point.
TAA Agreement
No 12-month look back.
We assume that this negotiated point is related to the time period factored
into
the availability calculation for purposes of determining whether or not an
extension or additional work by the Contractor has been triggered as a result
of
dropping below the availability standards. Please explain how this negotiated
point affects the mechanics of the TAA and also please explain how
availability
will be calculated. As we noted during our last conference call, we are
concerned that Siemens believes that the availability value is not reduced if
maintenance work is being performed during periods when the Facility is not
being dispatched.
12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.
We interpret the above negotiated point to mean that the 12-month clock for
the
initial guarantee period stops during commissioning regardless of how long it
takes the Contractor to commission on gas (unless delays are attributable to
Owner) and re-starts after Contractor has successfully completed the
performance
testing on gas. Please confirm that our understanding is correct.
In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if
there are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has indicated
that we will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business
interruption insurance when we go operational on gas. This should solve
the issue over the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects,
design, and workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc.
Incidentally, for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which
is not a new technology designation. The duration of BI coverage is 18
months per event with US$150,000 deductible.
Stone & Webster is advising the Lenders to have an insurance advisor review
this
point.
Thanks in advance for your response. Hope all is well.
Regards,
Bradley
|
Suzanne: thanks for your help and your prompt attention.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
01/11/2000 03:48 PM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Phys Gas Locations
Randy,
We are in the process of setting up the following locations in red below in
EOL as requested by Frank Ermis.
We need to get the pipe , zone (both required) and meter, if applicable,
commercial would like these locations mapped into Sitara.
In order for these locations to flow into position manager in Sitara
automatically (instead of manuelly entered) when these locations are hit on
EOL,
we need this information. Can you provide this information as soon as
possible?
Thank you for your help!
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
01/11/2000 03:12 PM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner on 01/11/2000 02:20:58 PM
To: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: [email protected]
Subject: New Phys Gas Locations
Frank would like to see the following 3 Locations approved from trading:
First:
Opal; which is already set up as a Location and is out in DRAFT. Dave, I've
already asked Frank to have Jeff Shankman look at thh product and offer
approval. Please review.
Then:
Location: PGT Malin
Abbreviation: PGT Malin
Sort Code: 2850
Description: The transaction is for delivery at Pacific Gas Transmission
Company - Malin.
Location: PG&E Pool
Abbreviation: PG&E Pool
Sort Code: 2840
Description: The transaction is for delivery at Pacific Gas & Electric
Company - City Gate Pool Gas.
Jennifer; can you check with the logistics guys and make sure these are good
points and descriptions. Malin Lines 400 and 401 are no longer used, and PGE
is City Gate Pool Gas.
Frank, if you could review the descriptions also and offer comments I'd
appreciate it.
Dale
3-9746
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 01:35
PM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
bcc:
Subject: Re: Scope Document-Contract Exchage (Enron only)
Randy,
Bob Superty would like you to attend this meeting, if you are available
this afternoon. Please also read the document below.
I have added it to your calendar.
Thanks! : ) Heather
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
o: Carrie Slagle/HOU/ECT@ect, Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, George D
Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RESCHEDULED - Re: Contract Exchange Mtg.
The Contract Exchange meeting has been rescheduled for Monday, Sept. 11th.
from 3:30pm - 5:00pm and will be in EB 21C1. The meeting will be to discuss
Contract Exchange module requirements. If you have any other questions,
please feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
Brenda
x31914
|
of course. You should probably sit with Stacey, because she has the most
daisy chains and confirming to do. Any day but Friday will do this week.
Let me know. |
Lammers is driving this but I recall that this has far reaching consequences
for tax. I suggest you intervene immediately.
regards,
Rob
From: Rick Hopkinson on 12/14/2000 01:31 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Cuiaba-Letter of Credit for Diesel Fuel Supply
Rob, I just received a copy of a DASH asking for an increase on the letter of
credit that is provided for the Cuiaba I project diesel fuel supply. That
DASH states that Shell has not agreed to participate in the cost of the
letter of credit and as a result that Enron is entitled to charge Shell
Libor plus 4 % per annum on Shell's share of the guarantee under the terms of
a letter agreement between Shell Cuiaba Holdings Ltd. and Enron.
Has this been put into effect? We are sensitive to this because we may have
IRS transfer pricing issues with respect to guarantees that Enron makes on
loans to its various project entities.
The last time I had talked was to Joanna back in late September/October and
she said it had not been put into effect.
Regards,
Rick
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 12:30 PM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
12/12/2000 09:48 AM
To: "Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Mahaffey, Tom"
<[email protected]>, "Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]>, [email protected],
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Dutton, Chris CMJ
SI-GPBF" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: OPIC questions regarding spur pipelines at Kp 75 and kp362
This is fine for me.
"Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]> on 12/11/2000 05:27:54 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Mahaffey, Tom"
<[email protected]>, "Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: OPIC questions regarding spur pipelines at Kp 75 and kp362
how is Friday at 12:30 am EST for our ECA call. Tom M. is tied up until
12:30 or so on Friday. Frank - is this too late for you?
Mary
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 05:17 AM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
02/12/2001 09:48 AM
To: [email protected], "Kluesener, Frank" <[email protected]>, "Rivera,
Nancy A." <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: GSA
On Friday we distributed RFPs for securing bridge gas. Letters went today
to Chaco, TotalfinaElf, Andina, Maxus, BritishGas and Petrobras for them to
quote us 6-month gas with our option to extend for another 6 months. We have
given them until March 2nd to respond.
Pete Weidler will meet with YPF (hopefully with Ernesto Lopez Anad?n) the
week of the 19th.
|
That's great for me.
"Barquin, John" <[email protected]> on 01/16/2001 12:57:23 PM
To: "Novak, John (Enron)" <[email protected]>, "Gay, Rob (Enron)"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Conf Call re termination strategy
11:00 am Houston time works. Just let me know what the call-in numbers are.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]
<[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue Jan 16 13:52:03 2001
Subject: Conf Call re termination strategy
Rob and John: Claudia is not available today but will be available tomorrow
after 8:00 am Houston time. Does 11:00 am Houston time (3:00 pm Brazil
time) work for you? If so, let me know and I'll set up a dial in number.
Rgds,
John
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
|
Sneak Preview
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to say about the Ridges and completion of the
gas line in connection with the financing. Also on the Interconnection issue
we are still waiting on the Tozzini memo. We either need to have someone
riding herd on Tozzini on this (I thought it was Jose) or I need to go to SP
and make this happen. |
Novak and I are still working on it. John's view is that the legal analysis
provided by Tozzini is not supportable based on the facts of certain regs,
etc. We are trying to decide what are the implications so we can advise the
banks. It seems that we probably do need to assign the agreements.
From: Stephen Gray@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/28/2000 03:41 PM EST
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Transmission Regulation Memo
Rob,
Your name came up on the Cuiaba taks list call today. The issue was the
summary of the ONS contracts issue (who needs to signe ONS contracts... EPE
or Furnas?).
Have you received the information you needed form Tozzini? What is the
status of that memo?
thank you,
Steve Gray
202-466-9174
|
I like this conceptually as an approach to manage costs but see the potential
problems with Shell if EECC is paid on time. I think it may also be
extremely difficult to rework the LD's because the EECC wrap does not match
up with the subs very well (in some cases EECC's protection exceeds the subs
and in other is less). I also wonder who is the credit for contractor
obligations in this scenario for the lenders?
Peter E Weidler
01/20/2001 09:31 AM
To: Cuiaba Core team, John Guidry/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Cuiaba EPC/Changeorders - please respond
I would like you all to consider the following concept and send back
feedback. Especially John Novak or Eddy - on whether or not we have
significant exposure with Shell by using this approach.
If EECC is not neccessarily in the "for profit" business and Enron's goal is
to conclude the construction with as least cost as possible. We need to
eliminate the negotiations between EECC and the project. Right now - we get
change orders from EECC which include a markup of 10 %, and are "fluffed up"
because they know the project is going to object and negotiate and Shell is
not going to be happy until we reduce the cost of the proposed change orders
- this is a waste of time but has become part of the continuous
contractor/prjoect dance. EECC also has some profit within the turnkey
portion of the job (pipelines and powerplant) and is also asking for early
completion bonus on some things. My concept is for Cuiaba team and EECC to
go complete open book. Let us analyze and categorize all of EECC's actual
costs so we understand where we stand currently with respect to work
performed under the turnkey and outside of turnkey - and then we go straight
to final negotiations with Conduto and Bolinter. EECC and us will both
jointly negotiate best deal possible, using our combined knowledge. Get the
debate on EECC profit and whether or not it was appropriate to commission
certain work, or whether or not it was their fault or our fault, out of the
picture so everyone can focus on minimizing the total cost of this project -
from Enron's perspective.
We we conclude the process = the project gets charged all direct costs and
third party costs. For those items which is clearly not the responsibility
fo the project - we offset those against profit and present the results to
Shell. We go to Shell and say here it is - please audit and either approve or
object. Whatever the dispute - we will negotiate and as a result $10mm
profit may get decreased.
The advantage of this route is - we work together to minimize overall cost of
project, we eliminate an intercompany debate which will cost time and money
and Enron can undertand what the cost of this thing really is. Right now I
do not actually know how much of the capex is profit and could and should be
deducted from our capex budget number as it relates to Enron's position in
the project.
Downside is - Shell may consider that Project management has violated its
fudiciary responsibility to the project Although I think this can be
mitigated by audit and prior explanation of what we are doing to Shell. I do
not really want Shell directly involved until we are done - because I do not
know what we will find or conclude. Need help on fine tuning this part of
the strategy.
Let me know if I have rocks in my head. If this is a good idea - I would
like to run it to ground this week with EECC.
Pete
|
Russell: i sold JC Energy 1.284/day @ socal @ Index flat for the month of
August. Let me know if you need anything else. |
Jana: go ahead and set me up to interview the people whose resumes I have
received (I did receive them). Thanks. |
It's getting pricey, especially on the fee side. But what are the options at
this point. Peter informs me that we have been limited on talking to banks
which pretty much dilutes our leverage. I also think that the person doing
the negotiating has no accountability to her clients. I think you should
scream bloody murder (perhaps to the new bosses of the region) This is going
to be a huge drain on the P&L.
Brett R Wiggs
11/29/2000 11:57 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: New Pricing on the South American transaction
Rob:
What are your thoughts?
Brett
---------------------- Forwarded by Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron on 11/29/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------
From: Cheryl Lipshutz@ECT on 11/28/2000 02:45 PM CST
To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kelly H Boots/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Heineman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
Subject: New Pricing on the South American transaction
Brett,
Below please find confirmation of what we verbally spoke of a few minutes ago
relating to the pricing of this facility:
Underwriting Fees: 50bp on each bank's allocated underwritten commitment
amount of the Tranche A amount of $430.75MM in total
Spread: 18 bp facility fee irregardless of usage on the entire Tranche
A facility size
82 bp Applicable margin on any borrowed amounts of
the Tranche A facility
Up Front fees to the Syndicate banks: expected to be in the 35bp - 45bp
range at final syndication.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 02:06 PM
---------------------------
From: Eddy Daniels on 01/31/2001 04:10 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: OPIC letter
Rob --
Here is the letter with the section on the YPF GSA revised as we discussed.
Best Regards,
EDD
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 10:26
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Kenneth Shulklapper 09/21/2000 10:20 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------
"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <[email protected]> on 09/21/2000 06:47:47 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
NIce Man! Especially #10
Blowjob Etiquette For Men, From Women:
> > 1. First and foremost, we are not obligated to do it.
> >
> > 2. Extension to rule #1 - So if you get one, be grateful.
> >
> > 3. I don't care WHAT they did in the porn video you
> > saw, it is not standard practice to cum on someone's
> > face.
> >
> > 4. Extension to rule #3 - No, I DON'T have to swallow.
> >
> > 5. My ears are NOT handles.
> >
> > 6. Extension to rule #5 - do not push on the top of
> > my head. Last I heard, deep throat had been done. And
> > additionally, do you really WANT puke on your dick?
> >
> > 7. I don't care HOW relaxed you get, it is NEVER OK
> > to fart.
> >
> > 8. Having my period does not mean that it's "hummer
> > week" - get it through your head - I'm bloated and I
> > feel like shit so no, I don't feel particularly obligated
> > to blow you just because YOU can't have sex right now.
> >
> > 9. Extension to #8 - "Blue Balls" might have worked
> > on high school girls - if you're that desperate, go
> > jerk off and leave me alone with my Midol.
> >
> > 10. If I have to pause to remove a pubic hair from my
> > teeth, don't tell me I've just "wrecked it" for you.
> >
> > 11. Leaving me in bed while you go play video games
> > immediately afterwards is highly inadvisable if you
> > would like my behavior to be repeated in the future.
> >
> > 12. If you like how we do it, it's probably best not
> > to speculate about the origins of our talent. Just enjoy
> > the moment and be happy that we're good at it. See also
> > rule #2 about gratitude.
> >
> > 13. No, it doesn't particularly taste good. And I don't
> > care about the protein content.
> >
> > 14. No, I will NOT do it while you watch TV.
> >
> > 15. When you hear your friends complain about how they
> > don't get blowjobs often enough, keep your mouth shut.
> > It is inappropriate to either sympathize or brag.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 10:50
AM ---------------------------
"Barquin, John" <[email protected]> on 07/25/2000 10:51:07 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Lammers, Rick (Enron)"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "Tarry, Steve" <[email protected]>, "Rankin,
Cliff" <[email protected]>, "Novak, John (Enron)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Critical Path Call
Melissa Raciti is asking whether we can hold the critical path call on
Friday rather than Wednesday. Frank will be back from vacation tomorrow,
and the Lenders are hoping to use the 10am EDT time slot for an internal
call. Does anyone object to this change in schedule?
|
No, he was moving out of the region as I came in. He worked for Rick Lammers
who speaks highly of him though.
From: Kevin Howard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 01/19/2001 07:30 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Mathis Conner
Rob:
Did you have any interaction with Mathis Conner in the S.A. region? He was a
general manager on some projects there in 1997/1998.
Kevin
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2000 05:00
PM ---------------------------
"JERUSSALMY, ALEXANDRE" <[email protected]> on 04/17/2000 11:35:02 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: Brazil Trends - April 2000
Please find attached the latest version of BankBoston's Brazil Trends (in
English and in Portuguese).
Our best regards.
> <<cleani.doc>> <<cleanp.doc>>
> English Portuguese
- cleani.doc
- cleanp.doc
|
Bob: this should be no problem for us. Thanks. |
I was thinking of you on the appropriate day but somehow I never managed to
let you know how much I care about you. I'm thinking of you now too and hope
you are happy and doing well.
Love
Rob
"Sue Vo Herbich, Esq." <[email protected]> on 07/18/2000 09:53:52 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Happy Birthday
thank you for your sweet message. Greg & i went to Las Vegas for 4 days &
all my sisters & their families were there vacationing at the same time. We
had a great time. Came back to work in late afternoon today - tired. Vegas
was actually my gift to Greg for his birthday which was a wk before mine but
we celebrated mine there too. Got your very nice phone message also -
thanks for cheering up my tired mind & body. Your voice sounds wonderful &
i breathed in all the telephonic kisses. Hope all is well on the road to
retirement. love, sue
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, July 17, 2000 1:53 PM
Subject: Happy Birthday
>It's a day late and a dollar short, but I wanted you to know I was thinking
>about you. Did you have a good one?
>
>Lots of kisses
>
>Expect my call
>
>Love Rob
>
>
|
Donna: what is Gay day? I do not want to miss any significant events. |
Phillip: the changes I would like to make are to promote Patti to Manager
whenever you feel the time is right, and then I am going to recommend Stacey
for promotion to Sr. Specialist based on her recent performances. I also
would like to be able to use the bonus system this year to reward some of the
people who have been here the last couple of years. It seems like we have to
keep paying outside people more and we don't get to reward the experienced
people who stick with us enough. Let me know what you think. Thanks.
|
Thanks. I have suggested to OPIC/KFW that perhaps S&W should listen in.
We'll see if they had time to arrange it. If not we will follow up after.
Regards,
Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/16/2001 04:35 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Banks Eng - New Status
Rob -
I have not spoken to anyone since we discussed doing this together. I asked
John G. to join the call with the lenders tomorrow.
rgds
laine
Rob G Gay@ENRON
01/16/2001 05:57 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: Banks Eng - New Status
I am going to talk with them tomorrow at 8:30 CST. You can join if you
like. Have you talked to Brad or Sue at S&W?
Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/12/2001 05:58 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Blanca Bollom/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Banks Eng - New Status
Rob -
I am available to call the Banks Eng and/or OPIC today after 11 am your time
until say 2 pm your time. Does this work for you? I can be reached at 55 65
9981-6071.
rgds
Laine
|
Phillp: here is Richard's revised letter. Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 02:46
PM ---------------------------
Richard D Rathvon@ENRON
12/04/2000 12:02 PM
Sent by: Richard Rathvon@ENRON
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: West Coast Gas
Attached is the e-mail that I revised pursuant to our discussions. I have
also sent to Bob Carter, the ENA lawyer on the National Gypsum deal. As you
can see, he does not see any issues that would prevent sending to my contact
at National Gypsum.
Do you have additional comments or changes?
(Also, I will pursue getting the name of the entity that sent it to National
Gypsum.)
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Rathvon/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000
12:04 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 12/04/2000 10:46:29 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: West Coast Gas
Looks good to me.
Richard D
Rathvon@ENRON To: Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Sent by: cc:
Richard Subject: Re: West Coast
Gas(Document link: Bob Carter)
Rathvon@ENRON
12/04/2000
10:36 AM
I want to send this to our customer, National Gypsum, but thought you
should review prior to it going out. Do you have any comments?
I've talked with several people familar with gas sales and distribution in
the southwestern portion of the US. Summarized below is their collective
response:
1. The pipeline capacity is limited due to an order by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and FERC has jurisdiction over the
interstate sale and distribution of natural gas. The Department of
Transportation has jursidiction only over certain safety issues resulting
from the gas explosion.
2. The spot market has risen in the Arizona area -- currently it is
at $ 17.11__ for 30-day _Jan'01__. The reason prices are high is due to the
excessive demand in California for natural gas for its power plants. Thus,
gas is flowing into California -- the only way gas will flow east away from
California is in response to higher prices.
3. Enron is not "holding back supplies to the area". Enron is not a
producer of natural gas, does not have ANY physical supplies, and does not
have or utilize storage capacity in this area. Also, Enron controls
pipeline capacity over the El Paso Gas Pipeline of only 80,000 cf per day
-- this pipeline has a capacity of 4 BILLION cf per day (at full capacity).
The dominant holder of capacity on this pipleline is a gas marketing
subsidiary of El Paso Gas. Moreover, there are numerous marketers of
natural gas in the area, ensuring competition and pricing visibility and
liquidity. Thus, there is no way that Enron could control or influence the
price of physical suppliles in the area.
4. Gas trading generally occurs over monthly or seasonal (e.g.,
winter) periods, not annual periods. And, the winter season for which
marketers generally quote prices is considered to be November to March (not
on December 1 as the note below suggests).
5. Finally, Enron would not want to hold back physical supplies to
the area. Enron is primarily a trader of natural gas, engaged in the
buying and selling of the non-physical and financial side of natural gas
supplies. Through Enron On Line, Enron is both a seller AND a buyer,
making margins on trades of positions in natural gas. Thus, Enron would
be disadvantaged by not selling gas positions, even if it could hold back
physical supplies to the area, because it is not engaged in buying and
selling of positions in natural gas.
"Lowe, Carol" <[email protected]> on 11/30/2000 04:46:56 PM
To: "Richard D. Rathvon (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: "Kellie Metcalf (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Subject: West Coast Gas
Rich,
The following information was included in an email that was sent to our
executives and CEO. The tone leaves a negative impression for Enron. Can
you or someone at Enron comment on Enron's role or lack thereof with
respect
to this item? I am afraid this will taint our plans if not addressed
quickly. I want to circulate Enron's side of the story.
Carol
Excerpt from email circulated today:
Due to the lingering effects of the August gas pipeline explosion in New
Mexico that killed 10 people, coupled with some possible market
manipulation
by Enron, we're facing a potential problem at Phoenix in the short term and
possibly all three western plants longer term. The pipeline which is owned
by El Paso Gas is back in operation, but is being limited to 50% of
capacity. Weather has turned cold, spiking demand for gas in the region.
Enron appears to be holding back supplies to the area until at least
December 1st, when many of its contracts set the index price for the
following year. Consequently, gas prices on the spot market in Arizona are
hitting $25 per MMBTU. The situation has caused several marketers to
declare force majeure. If our marketer does so, we'll be curtailed. As
you
probably know, we don't have any backup fuel capabilities at these three
plants. The U.S. Dept of Transportation controls this and is reported to
be
getting involved. Will keep you posted as it unfolds.
|
Check that.? We have pre-bid starting at 3:00. Anytime before that would
be fine. Thanks. |
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:58
AM ---------------------------
From: George Smith 11/01/2000 11:23 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT
Does this bring anybody to mind?
---------------------- Forwarded by George Smith/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:22
AM ---------------------------
Charles T Muzzy
11/01/2000 11:10 AM
To: Mark L Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT
---------------------- Forwarded by Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
11:09 AM ---------------------------
From: Dolores Muzzy 11/01/2000 09:54 AM
To: Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT
- How to discourage harassment in the office.mpg
|
Phillip: this should be to you instead of Bob Shiring.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2000 12:35
PM ---------------------------
Alex Saldana
01/05/2000 12:15 PM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Shring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Flores-Cuellar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Rivera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron On Line and Tracking
This meeting has been rescheduled for:
Friday, January 7th
2:15-3:15pm
EB 3084
If you have questions please call George Smith @36993
or Alex @ 57389. I will keep you informed of any changes.
Thanks
Alex
---------------------- Forwarded by Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2000 12:10
PM ---------------------------
Alex Saldana
01/05/2000 11:30 AM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Shring/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Flores-Cuellar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Rivera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron On Line and Tracking
Please plan to attend the above mentioned meeting:
Thursday, January 6th
3:30-4:30pm
EB 3013
If you have any questions please call George Smith @ 36993,
for any scheduling conflicts call me at @ 57389.
Thanks
Alex
|
In preperation for our call, the memo which was requested. I will also be
able to brief you on this week's progress with Furnas. I have a lawyer
tracing the section reference for the Eletrobras performance guarantee which
appears as brackets in the memo. I should be able to advise you of the exact
reference tomorrow morning when we talk.
Regards,
Rob
|
Can you make 10 copies for the 10:00 AM mtg?
Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/13/2001 12:43 PM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
02/13/2001 05:00 PM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Mtg w/ Rebecca Mac
Sneak Preview
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to say about the Ridges and completion of the
gas line in connection with the financing. Also on the Interconnection issue
we are still waiting on the Tozzini memo. We either need to have someone
riding herd on Tozzini on this (I thought it was Jose) or I need to go to SP
and make this happen.
|
Theresa: thanks for all your help over the last week. We really appreciate
it and are glad we can cooperate so closely with the Denver office. If you
need anything, let us know. Again, Thanks. |
John, I jjust reviewed the interconnection memo from Claudia. Once again it
is weak on the situation and our remedies. Can you help Jose try to pull
this together. |
Mary, thanks so much for your note. In terms of managing costs this is a
little like trying to save money on the project by turning out the lights in
my office when I go home; However, I have noticed over the course of this
deal that FF failed to accuratrely reflect the business deal on a number of
occaisions when issues were resolved verbally. This resulted in things
having to be revisited and rehashed in a costly manner. Therefore, with the
ECA, I attempted to reach agreement on the commercial structure first and
actually reflect the result in the table. The concern I raised with Nancy
was the fact that even when given a written record of the result reached by
the business people, the document provided still reflected the principal
terms poorly. We were able to resolve this problem on Fridays call, but the
call was costly (outside lawyers in attendance were Melissa, Stefan, Cliff,
Mathew, and I believe Juliana). In fact things went swimmingly on the call
primarily because there was no new ground being broken.
I am just trying to improve things a little bit with this discussion. I
remain extreemely appreciative of all of your efforts and I think the world
of Melissa and the job she has done on this project.
Thanks for listening.
"Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]> on 12/18/2000 08:31:19 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: ECA provisions
Rob
Nancy informed me that you were not happy because certain provisions/deals
discussed on the business side were not accurately reflected in the finance
agreements, which is creating additional legal expenses. I assume you are
referring to a recent draft of the ECA in which the fall away provisions
that we discussed were not accurately reflected in the agreement. This is
my fault - in the interest of trying to expedite getting the draft to the
sponsors, I authorized Melissa to send the draft out without reviewing the
provisions first. Normally, KfW and OPIC review the agreements before
sending to you and our lawyers make the required changes before you see the
agreement. I will no longer authorize her to send anything to the sponsors
before KfW and OPIC review the contents in full. Hopefully - this will help
prevent this situation from occuring in the future.
Sorry for the inconvenience this caused the sponsors.
Mary
|
Heather: no West Deskers need to go late. Thanks. |
I guess whoever would like to. Everyone seems to need people right now.
Thanks. |
This is just to inform you that finally, this morning Carlos Miranda
(Superintendente de Hidrocarburos) of SIRESE approved TBS-Transredes FT
Amendment and TBS-Andina/Maxus assignment. I%ll fax you a copy of the letter
as soon as we receive it.
Another CP met.
Regards
Rob |
Toni: I would like to extend an offer to Cynthia Lara. I interviewed her
last week. The offer should be $58,000/year. If you have any questions just
let me know or contact Patti Sullivan @ x30494 or Bob Superty. Thanks for
your help. |
Hello,
Robert Gay
VP and Regional CFO EnronSouth America
333 Clay Street
Houston, TX 77002-7582
Ph 713-646-7582
Fax 713-345-6003
E [email protected]
"Beachum, ShaLonda" <[email protected]> on 11/28/2000 09:26:22 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: OPIC Finance Survey Follow-up
Hello,
My name is ShaLonda Beachum, from the
Overseas Private Investment Corporation. I am writing to follow-up with you
regarding the survey that you completed with Jean Strasser.
Please respond with your current job title and
business mailing address so that we can update our records.
Thank you,
ShaLonda Beachum, Management Services
Overseas Private Investment Corporation
(202) 336-8539
|
Bob: we would be looking at El Paso and Northwest Pipelines. Thanks. |
Rob's EGF page completed.
Edward E Graham
12/21/2000 03:30 PM
To: Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Robert H
George/NA/Enron@Enron, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron,
Britaldo Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Eduardo Camara/SA/Enron@Enron, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: URGENT--2nd draft Millenium DASH
attached are my comments on the dash
|
I have been relying soley on Jose and Claudia for interpretations of the
relevant regs. I have not seen Enlish translations of the regs or the CCT &
CUST so I don't know how we get charged. I think Jose has some idea and I
seem to recall US$.0007/kw-hr but I don't have anything official.
Richard A Lammers
12/18/2000 12:06 PM
Sent by: Richard A Lammers
To: "CEB - Cl?udia Bonelli" <[email protected]>, Jose Bestard, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Rob G
Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Interconex?o de Redes
Jose and Rob- This note is short and sweet and seems to say what we want it
to say,i.e the changes in the transmission regs came after the PPA was
signed,this really is the responsibility of Furnas and any costs can be
recovered thru economic equillibrium. However ,I think we need to bolster the
change in law argument by referencing the section in the PPA , provide some
economic examples of the type of financial exposure to the project and
reference the sections in the operatin accord and ppa where Furnas is
responsible for all charges after the delivery points.Jose- please focus on
cleaning this document up today so we can deliver the note asap. The lenders
raised the delay in getting this note to them again last Friday.Rob- do you
have some calculations that you have done that everyone can review for
inclusion into the note.We also need your review of the note for correct spin
on how you want to deliver to the banks
"CEB - Cl?udia Bonelli" <[email protected]> on 12/14/2000 08:53:22 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Interconex?o de Redes
Em anexo, sum?rio da minuta preliminar do memo, conforme combinado. Gostaria
receber seus coment?rios, para conclus?o do trabalho.
Atenciosamente.
Cl?udia Bonelli.
Tozzini Freire Teixeira e Silva Advogados
S?o Paulo SP
Brazil
E-Mail: [email protected]
Telephone: 55- 11- 232.2100
Telecopier: 55- 11- 232.3100
Assistant Marta Bevilacqua, Extension 114
_________________________________________________________
Warning
This message may contain confidential material.
If you have received it by mistake please let us know and then destroy it.
Do not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone.
Thank you.
- 12-14ME1.DOC
|
Given the nature of the questions I agree verbal is the way to go. I'll try
and arrange. Is tomorrow ok?
Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/20/2001 08:13 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Guidry/NA/Enron@Enron, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Vincent@ENRON
Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations
Rob -
Recommend a call to discuss these issues with Brad. A written response will
probably put us in a letter "do" loop.
rgds
Laine
---------------------- Forwarded by Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/20/2001 05:46 AM ---------------------------
Rob G Gay@ENRON
02/14/2001 05:50 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
Guidry/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Vincent/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations
We will need to craft a response
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:20 AM
---------------------------
[email protected] on 02/14/2001 09:43:16 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations
Rob - We've reviewed your memo which sets forth general points of your
negotiations with Siemens. Following are comments and questions regarding
certain negotiated points:
EOT Claim Agreement
Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on oil;
if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning
obligations
We observe that while this point places reasonable responsibility on the Owner
to correct problems that were a result of their commercial operations, it is
introduces an opportunity for the Contractor to place unfounded blame on the
owner for affecting the Contractor's ability to commission.
Risk of Loss remains with owner during commissioning on gas
We understand that the Facility is under the care, custody and control of the
Owner and that the Facility is currently operating under the insurance
coverage
intended for the commercial operating period (versus the construction period).
Please confirm that there is no reason to be concerned about insurance
coverage
if a problem arises resulting in material damage attributable to Contractor
action during commissioning on gas. We are also advising the Lenders to have
this point reviewed by an insurance advisor.
Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning
During our last conference call it was indicated that the first choice was to
test to determine degradation and the alternative was to agree on a set of
curves. It appears that Siemens was unwilling to agree to the test approach.
We observe that the curves used to determine owner credit may be biased to the
benefit of Siemens. We trust that your operations experts will diligently
review the basis for the curves.
Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven by
owner
Please explain the rationale behind forgiving $4 million of Contractor LDs.
Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas
During our last conference call it was indicated that there would be a stand
down until 7/1/01 when gas is available, no LDs would be paid related to oil
firing performance, and that the LD clock would start if gas commissioning is
not complete within 60 days. We do not understand the above negotiated point.
Please confirm that our understanding is correct or clarify your negotiated
point.
TAA Agreement
No 12-month look back.
We assume that this negotiated point is related to the time period factored
into
the availability calculation for purposes of determining whether or not an
extension or additional work by the Contractor has been triggered as a result
of
dropping below the availability standards. Please explain how this negotiated
point affects the mechanics of the TAA and also please explain how
availability
will be calculated. As we noted during our last conference call, we are
concerned that Siemens believes that the availability value is not reduced if
maintenance work is being performed during periods when the Facility is not
being dispatched.
12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.
We interpret the above negotiated point to mean that the 12-month clock for
the
initial guarantee period stops during commissioning regardless of how long it
takes the Contractor to commission on gas (unless delays are attributable to
Owner) and re-starts after Contractor has successfully completed the
performance
testing on gas. Please confirm that our understanding is correct.
In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if
there are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has indicated
that we will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business
interruption insurance when we go operational on gas. This should solve
the issue over the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects,
design, and workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc.
Incidentally, for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which
is not a new technology designation. The duration of BI coverage is 18
months per event with US$150,000 deductible.
Stone & Webster is advising the Lenders to have an insurance advisor review
this
point.
Thanks in advance for your response. Hope all is well.
Regards,
Bradley
|
I will be out on Th & FRi because my wife is having surgery. I can't have my
cel on in the hospital but I will have it with me and will check voice mail
from time to time.
Shelly Butler with the Associate program HR indicated that by giving Tracee
the short term employment we will be responsible for her termination package
at the end of that time (approx. 6 mos or $40,000). We probably need to do
some structuring here, no? |
Dave: my concern not only is with the outage on Sunday, but what may happen
between Sunday and Tuesday. With everything else going on, I would hate for
my group to come in here on Tuesday and have problems on top of everything
else. We are going to be having a lot to do and I would feel more
comfortable without this distraction. Let me know what you think. |
Laine,
What would be the basis for their allegation that the TAA is not valid. Is
their a legal basis for their contention?
Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/10/2000 04:22 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
[email protected], Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Telecom with S&W
Rob and Rick -
Spoke today with Sue Garven and Brad Barta. Below find comments/notes -
Brad mentioned his concern about turnover of O&M staff with Duane's
departure. Responded that we had a capable plant manager with 10 years
plant experience plus key people at the lower levels had remained. Also told
Brad that the two I&C consultants we have had since the outset of the project
are still working at the facility and that we were taking on 6 technicans
from Siemens during combined cycle start-up. Brad seemed okay with the
response.
Discussed two key contractual issues -
TAA - They expressed the importance of keeping the TAA in place with no
dilution since it is so important to the lenders. Furthermore they mentioned
that SCC's position is Siemens will come after us to dilute the TAA and that
in fact it is no longer valid. (I agree Siemens will come after us for the
risk profile modification) Responded that we felt that the TAA was still
valid and mentioned that Siemens might want the TAA to commence at completion
on oil. Sue's commented that we need to calculate how much it would cost us
to keep the start date at Substantial Completion on fuel.
Phase II - Explained that given the current commissioning program that we had
no intention of lowering the dampners and testing for simple cycle Phase II
on gas. They are on board with this concept. We just need to get a white
paper to them to explain in detail.
Drilling -
The comment was the formations are tough but will get there slowly but surely.
Using 1 May as gas available at the plant date.
Change Orders -
Transmitted SCCs frustration on little movement on change orders related to
the pipeline. Told them that many of the change orders still without
documents and in any case the strategy was to settle up at the end of the job.
Brad and Sue mentioned that they would feel more comfortable with the process
and putting a number on the value of the change orders if we were closer to
resolution.
worried about the size of the change orders - especially the outside case.
have not given this to the banks
there outside change order case is as follows -
Power Plant Pipeline Total
Total EPC US$ 419 mm
Approved Change Orders 22 mm
Pending Change Orders US$ 10 mm US$ 25 mm 35 mm
Cont Change Orders 8 mm 24 mm 32 mm
Hope this information is useful.
rgds
Laine
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 05:18 AM
---------------------------
Jose Bestard@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/20/2001 04:01 PM
To: [email protected], Michelle
Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cuiaba LT
cc:
Subject: Tanslation of Furnas letter
See the translation of Furnas response of Feb 8.
1) They are not signing the Consent.
2) Questions the FM claim
3) Raises the need to come up with tariff for a period not initially
contemplated in the Contract (This needs to be done irrespective of the
Consent issue)
4) Questions the Economic equilibrium revision if not approved be Aneel
5) Raises MAE exposure for the project
---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/20/2001 03:50 PM ---------------------------
"MLN - Mila Leite Nascimento" <[email protected]> on 02/20/2001 12:59:44 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc: "CEB - Cl?udia Bonelli" <[email protected]>
Subject: Dear Sirs,
Dear Sirs,
As requested, please find attached the translation of the letter received by
Mr. Laine Powell from Furnas on February 8, 2001, which refers to the EPE
letter of January 29, 2001.
If you need any clarification, please contact us.
Best Regards,
Mila L. Nascimento
- FURNLET.DOC
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 07:43 AM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
01/31/2001 09:55 AM
To: [email protected], "Kluesener, Frank" <[email protected]>, Susan
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Siemens negotiations
Two agreements have been negotiated with Siemens as part of the plant
turnover for Provisional Completion Phase III on oil: 1) the EOT Claim
Agreement between Siemens and SCC and 2) modifications to the TAA between
Siemens and EPE.
The changes which the lenders should review are as follows:
EOT Claim Agreement
14 Day Availability Test with respect to Provisional Completion Phase III on
oil, on a look-back basis over 6 months, required as a specific performance
requirement
After PC on oil, Siemens can demobilize
Compensation for commissioning on oil $5,720,000; $30,000 per day for owner
delay
Bonus of $15,000 per day that PC achieved before 17 Feb
Phase III Substantial Completion on gas
60 days prior written notice on gas availability
If sound level guarantees demonstrated on oil, only need to demonstrate far
field sound on gas
Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on
oil; if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning obligations
Performance guarantees remain in tact per EPC
Long stop date on Phase III Substantial Completion on gas of 31 Dec 01
Substantial Completion on gas - punchlist limited to deficiencies from Work
performed to achieve Substantial Completion on gas
Risk of Loss remains with owner during commisioning on gas
Siemens agrees to enter into negotiations to provide operational assistance
Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning
Compensation for commissioning on natural gas $1,220,000 lump sum; $20,000
per day for owner delay
Warranty - 6 months after Provisional Completion on oil
Option to buy extended warranty for up to 6 months at $175,000; must elect 60
days prior to expiration of Primary Warranty Period
Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven
by owner
Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas
Payments to be paid (including EOTof $5,720,000): 15 Feb $5,446,141; 28 Feb
$14,353,401 with offset of $4,000,000 for Phase I LD payment due from Siemens
to SCC
Late payment interest rate of 14%
TAA Agreement
Effective date Provisional Completion Phase III on oil
No 12 month look back
12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.
Additional Insurance
In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if there
are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has indicated that we
will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business interruption
insurance when we go operational on gas. This should solve the issue over
the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects, design, and
workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc. Incidentally,
for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which is not a new
technology designation. The duration of BI coverage is 18 months per event
with US$150,000 deductible.
Typically we will always have this coverage in place but if their is a
supplier warranty then the party providing the warranty pays ahead of the
insurer. In the case where the supplier does not pay or the warranty has
ended then the insurer is the primary.
We will need to execute these agreements immediately. Please advise with
your thoughts as soon as possible..
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/09/2001 07:42 PM
---------------------------
Tracee Bersani@ECT
01/08/2001 01:27 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Change Order log (forecast and contingent only)
Per your request ->
Also, you may be interested in the approved amounts:
|
I am interested. Would that be framed? I'll talk it over with my wife.
Donna Rose <[email protected]> on 02/06/2001 10:46:53 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Zjawinska
Sorry...I cannot do a trade...but I can probably provide a Startled for you
at about $1800.
Best
DonnaAt 11:08 AM 2/2/01 -0600, you wrote:
>I noticed on your web site that you have a number of Joana Zjawinska's for
>sale including "Love, Life & Money Suite 2" (which we currently own) and
>"Startled".
>
>I was wondering if you would consider a trade where we would provide "Love
>Life & Money" (framed) and we would receive "Startled"?
|
When I open this letter there is nothing there. Can you send again?
From: Eddy Daniels on 01/31/2001 04:10 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: OPIC letter
Rob --
Here is the letter with the section on the YPF GSA revised as we discussed.
Best Regards,
EDD
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 04:37 AM
---------------------------
"Boehm, Barbara" <[email protected]> on 02/21/2001 06:23:42 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'Kluesener, Frank'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Commitment extension
Thanks for the update. The sooner the better I think; it would be helpful
for us to know what defaults exist as we assess the whole "consent"
situation.
Thanks
Barbara
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Boehm, Barbara; Kluesener, Frank
Subject: Re: Commitment extension
Yes, we have not been able to pull Laine and Jose away from their
very
important activities on the Ridges, the Siemens negotiation and the
Furnas/
Brazil Inc. efforts. I think Eddie Daniels is going to try and
start
pulling the scedule together this week and next. Thanks for the
follow up.
Please let me know if the passage of time is endangering this
effort.
Regards,
Rob
"Boehm, Barbara" <[email protected]> on 02/20/2001 05:44:24 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Commitment extension
Rob
I forgot to ask you about this this morning: can you please give me
an
update on the status of Amendment #2 (the commitment extension). I
believe
we are waiting for an update of the attached schedule.
Thanks
Barbara
|
I definately would not discuss this with Petrobras. Simply confirm that
there is no credit requirement for the Bank or that the Bank we want to use
exceeds any credit requirement and arrange the L/C required with Robin
Verial. Lets not make this a bigger task than it is.
Marcus Stephan
01/10/2001 12:18 PM
To: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Letter Credit. - NY Bank Question
Tracee,
As I told you by phone, I don't believe it is a good idea to talk to
Petrobr?s about the l/c before delivering it to them because they may require
a bank's name that we don't have margin to work with right now. Since there
isn't any limitation on location of the l/c bank on side letter or on the
fuel contract, we don't have any other options besides Arab Bank and its
correspondent bank in Brazil.
If Petrobr?s have any restrictions on the l/c during our meeting or some days
later (when we will be delivering the l/c), we can argue that there was no
restriction on location/names of the l/c bank on contract/side letter and ask
more time to obtain a new one or with another financial institution later.
Rick/Rob - We would like to have your opinion on this. If you believe we
should consult Petrobr?s prior to deliver the l/c, I can talk to them and get
their point of view on this issue.
Unfortunately, our meeting has not been confirmed yet.
Regards,
Marcus.
Tracee Bersani@ECT
01/10/2001 01:17 PM
To: Marcus Stephan/SA/Enron@ENRON@EES
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Letter Credit. - NY Bank Question
Marcus,
Please have a look at the side letter and contract to see if there is any
limitation on location of the L/C bank. ABN Amro had a local branch in
Brazil so the $R draws would have been relatively straight forward. However,
with Arab Bank's New York Branch, the way a draw would work is this:
-Petrobras sends fax to Arab bank indicating a draw request
-Arab Bank will send funds to Brazil through its Brazilian correspondent bank
and convert dollars to $R. There would be an FX trade and fee associated. (I
assume that Enron would pick up the cost of this.)
The one issue we need to consider is that any draw request would take
approximately 24 hours as it involves a correspondent bank and FX trade.
Please confirm that Petrobras would not have a problem with this.
Regards,
Tracee
Marcus Stephan@ENRON
01/10/2001 08:34 AM
To: Tracee Bersani@EES
cc:
Subject: Letter Credit.
Tracee, Hi!
I was talking to a Tozzini lawyer and he said that that language on the side
letter (" reputable institution") is a kind of standard in Brazil for such
kind of contracts but that it doesn't have any correlation to any credit
rating standard. So, I believe we won't have any problems with the l/c from
Arab Bank.
I also read the fuel contract and realized that there is no restrictions or
requirements for the letter of credit except for its amount.
How is the l/c issuance going? Will we be able to have it on Friday?
Regards/Marcus.
|
This is one of the things I will be doing to stay busy.
|
When would you like to get together to go through the comments to the specs? |
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 10:25
AM ---------------------------
Robert Superty
05/31/2000 08:14 AM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Unify Logistics on call contacts for Help Desk
All - FYI, I would suggest copying this and keeping it handy so you can use
off-hours when necessary (even though the help desk should do the contacting)
Alex - See me about this. I would like some of this info added to the second
wallet cards your working on.
Thanks - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000
08:07 AM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen 05/30/2000 01:24 PM
To: Susan Lopez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave McMullan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trisha Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E
Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benedicta Tung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unify Logistics on call contacts for Help Desk
Susan,
I am planning to set up an on-call pager and cell phone for Unify Logistics.
In the meanwhile, please use the following for any Unify Logistics support
call you may receive:
Seq Name Home Pager Cell
1) On Call Pager 713-284-3757 (not yet activated)
2) Dave Nommensen 281-558-9145 1-888-487-1865 713-562-3986
3) Dave McMullan 281-855-4106 713-285-4982
4) Trisha Luong 281-565-8149 713-285-8715
5) Diane Niestrath 713-682-7416 713-525-0334
6) Benedicta (BT) Tung 281-565-9669 713-285-0931
There are several subsystems within Unify. The above list is strictly
related to Unify Logistics. They are they guys that schedule gas on a 7 X 24
basis.
This does NOT cover the guys in Unify that do Settlements.
Once I have the on-call pager activated, I will let you know.
Thanks, d.n.
|
Will do. Thanks. Mary, please give me a call when you have a free minute.
I have some news.
"Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]> on 12/14/2000 09:02:53 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: ECA provisions
Tom, Frank, Melissa and I are available tomorrow at 12:30 for the ECA call.
Can you ask Blanca to set up a dial in number and distribute?
Thanks
Mary
> .
|
Way to go Keith. You should be very proud of what you accomplished here and
I think the vision of what you set out to do continues. Best of luck in the
future.
Rob
Keith Sparks@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/18/2000 12:32 PM
To: Dippo Bello/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tami
Scrudder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yao
Apasu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Hirsh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward J Hlopak
Sr/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Archie N
Eubanks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Felicia
Erwin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Habiba
Bayi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob Bakondy/SF/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Skipper/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amadou
Ba/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Caroline
Schaeffer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Boyt@ENRON, Dan
Boyle@Enron, Cheryl Gaines/OTS/Enron@Enron, Kirk McDaniel@EES, Chris
Long@ENRON, John Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Shedd/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Whyte@EES, John Cockin@EES, Sheila
Kahanek@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julia Kazibwe@EES, Nicola
Blancke@ENRON, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Quaintance/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sean Long/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Closing of Barge Sale to AES
Team:
It is with much pleasure and gratitude that I confirm AES' stepping up to
purchase our remaining interest in the Barge project located in Lagos,
Nigeria. Thanks to the dedication and hard work of everyone, we were able to
create a robust and compelling project in spite of numerous detractors and
doubters. This latest development only reinforces the value of your efforts.
Please note that we still have interests in Nigeria (notably an EPC contract
for the Barges) and we remain engaged in a strategic alliance with AES and YF
Power to ensure the successful evacuation of power to all Nigerians via the
Barge project and the IPP as quickly as possible. Notwithstanding this sale,
we remain committed to this endeavor and believe that the alliance is the
most expedient vehicle to the realization of everyone's goals. If you
happen to have discussions with outsiders regarding these projects, please do
your part to quell the notion that Enron has "abandoned" the project. Feel
free to talk to me regarding any questions you may have.
Thanks again and congratulations on a job well done.
Keith
|
Jana:: I am the manager of West Desk Logistics, and I would like to start
having analysts rotate into my group. The gas trading desk director, Phillip
Allen is also very high on this idea. Could you give me a call so we could
discuss? I would like to get one of the new hires as quickly as possible.
My extension is 31991. Thanks. |
Patti will definitely be out on Friday. I am thinking about being out (I
have a lot of vacation left). |
The discussions went well on the ECA this morning and there are no issues of
any great significance left, other than Shell's sponsor buyout proposal. We
have one turn of the document to do but we are in good shape here (I guess
that is to say we are perfectly positioned to offer millions and millions in
sponsor support). I want to take just a little more time on the model to
make sure everything we send will tie, but we will get it to them on Monday
for sure. |
Here is what we have concluded based on discussions this morning:
1) We believe that Furnas has agreed to contract and pay for 300 MW on oil to
meet regulatory requirements concerning required capacity and reserve
margin. We do not believe that they intend for us to be dispatrched above
220 MW. (Do we have any document which could substantiate this?)
2) Although dispatch on a merit order basis would suggest that EPE runs full
time (with 300 MW available), there are practical constraints in the
transmission system which will prohibit this from actually occuring. [ Please
describe these constraints using some official sounding jargon but minimal
detail and in particular indicate what is involved to de-bottleneck and how
long this will take. I presume that Furnas is solely responsible for the
corrective measures.]
3) Based on our analysis, the optimal operating approach would be to generate
220MW with one turbine and 91 MW with the other for a total of 311 if
dipatched above 220 MW.
If we can prove that 1) & 2) are correct or convince the lenders that they
are, then I think we can suggest that fuel oil exposure is negligibe if gas
is ready by April 01. We will have to see how it looks when we add the Sue
Garvin flex months.
Therefore, a merit order analysis is only necessary if i) our supposition
about Furnas' motivations are incorrect and/or ii) the transmission problem
is cleared. If this happens it would be nice to be able to predict reduced
fuel utilization due to a) reduced dispatch during daily off-peak hours or
seasonal impacts, b) due to scheduled outages, and c) due to managing our
availabilty in such a way as to reduce fuel consumption operating losses.
Any data you can provide will be helpful.
Have I successfully connected the dots here?
If you have previously sent these materials to Felipe or Tracee please simply
grumble to yourself if you have to do an extra e-mail to me. Remember, you
don't have to be nice to a short timer unless you need them to get something
done.
Regards,
Rob
|
I think we are on the right track from our meeting yesterday. I talked to
Patti today and she is confirming the way we want to do things from a users
perspective. My thought is that we get a good, general, working model as to
how the information will flow, then take it back to our groups and go over
different scenarios within each region, such as Opal Plant, Socal, etc. We
can see how the information will flow and see what we need to tinker with.
I also have a few questions we need to think about at some point, and I did
not want to forget them.
1. When we make a change to an existing upstream/downstream contract, how
will we notify the counterparties that a change has occurred.
2. Should we lock out our customer's at some time so they can't make changes
at a late time? We could do the rest over the phone.
3. On EDI pipes, we could conceivably make changes up to 11:45 am, but it
would affect customers whose noms are due at 11:30.
I thought these were just questions we might want to think about. I'm sure
there are a lot of others.
Thanks. |
Interesting piece of history - my notes from a lecture I gave Bannantine
Circa 2/00-4/00
|
We are in good shape.
Richard A Lammers
01/12/2001 10:18 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Bank call today
Rob- I was not on the bank call this morning .Please let me know if any new
deliverables popped out on today's call with the banks.
|
Cliff,
Can you e-mail me the contract between Siemens and SCC?
"Rankin, Cliff" <[email protected]> on 01/16/2001 07:49:28 AM
To: "Powell, Laine (Enron)" <[email protected]>
cc: "Gay, Rob (Enron)" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: EOT Documents - Siemens Settlement
Laine, Rob and I spoke late last week about this as well. Given the
impracticality of bank involvement on a short time frame, we determined that
EPE should proceed to negotiate what we believe to be a commercially
reasonable agreement. We will present the negotiated agreement to the banks
later and deal with them in due course. Rob, it think, was going to discuss
this issue (among others presently facing the project) with the lenders this
week. Rob, feel free to chime in if I've misstated anything.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 3:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: EOT Documents - Siemens Settlement
Rob -
Don't know if you have spoken to the banks or owners eng about the
Siemens EOT settlement? Tried to set something up with you on Friday but
did not hear back. In any case attached is the latest version of the
document that covers the issue. This should not be sent to the banks since
we are still negotiating with SCC however it gives a good indication of
where we are going. If you need more information pls give Cliff a call or
I can be reached tomorrow in Cuiaba. In any case next week we plan on
closing this issue with Siemens and need bank sign-off real time as
discussed.
rgds
Laine
---------------------- Forwarded by Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/16/2001 07:19 AM ---------------------------
"Rankin, Cliff" <[email protected]> on 01/16/2001 06:54:01 AM
To: "Powell, Laine (Enron)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "Guidry, John (Enron)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "Rankin, Cliff" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: EOT Documents
Attached are (i) clean and black-lined drafts of the letter agreement among
SCC and Contractors regarding Siemens' EOT claim, reflecting comments from
V&E and Owner, and (ii) the initial draft of the letter agreement between
EPE and Siemens AG regarding the TAA.
If you have any difficulty opening the attached, please let me know by
reply
to this message. Thanks.
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
<<Letter Agreement re TAA.DOC>> <<Letter Agreement -- Siemens/SCC re
EOT.DOC>> <<Letter Agreement -- Siemens/SCC re EOT(1).DOC>>
(See attached file: Letter Agreement re TAA.DOC)
(See attached file: SCC re EOT.DOC)
(See attached file: SCC re EOT(1).DOC)
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
|
Thanks. Same here.
From: Peter Berger on 02/15/2001 12:36 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Good Luck
Best of luck with your new endeavour. It's been a pleasure working with you.
Peter
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 03:16
PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 07/23/2000 06:24:38 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: August Islander
Hi Kathleen, Randy, Chris, and Trish,
Attached is the text of the August issue of The Islander. The headings will
be lined up when Trish adds the art and ads. A calendar, also, which is in
the next e-mail.
I'll appreciate your comments by the end of tomorrow, Monday.
There are open issues which I sure hope get resolved before printing:
1. I'm waiting for a reply from Mike Bass regarding tenses on the Home Depot
article. Don't know if there's one developer or more and what the name(s)
is/are.
2. Didn't hear back from Ted Weir regarding minutes for July's water board
meeting. I think there are 2 meetings minutes missed, 6/22 and July.
3. Waiting to hear back from Cheryl Hanks about the 7/6 City Council and 6/7
BOA meetings minutes.
4. Don't know the name of the folks who were honored with Yard of the Month.
They're at 509 Narcissus.
I'm not feeling very good about the missing parts but need to move on
schedule! I'm also looking for a good dictionary to check the spellings of
ettouffe, tree-house and orneryness. (Makes me feel kind of ornery, come to
think about it!)
Please let me know if you have revisions. Hope your week is starting out
well.
'Nita
- AUGUST.WPD
|
The call tomorrow is to discuss legal strucutre of the ECA and is not a
numbers call. We will need plenty of number soon though so please proceed.
Thanks
Tracee Bersani@ECT
12/14/2000 02:10 PM
To: Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Cases and Assumptions for Fuel Overrun and Furnas Sensitivities Calc
All,
We may need to have some sensitivities ready when we meet with the Lenders
tomorrow on the ECA. In preparation for this, Felipe and I running the Bank
Model for the different cases listed in the attachment below. Please review
and provide comments on:
(1) accuracy of the Revised Base Case (A1) Assumptions
(2) the likelihood and reasonableness of the various cases
(3) answers to the items noted in Red
Regards,
Tracee
|
Veronica: per your request. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 10:21
AM ---------------------------
Heather Choate
06/21/2000 10:25 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Patti Sullivan - airline ticket
Randy,
Please confirm by forwarding this email to Veronica Thompson in Accounts
Payable...
That you agree Patti Sullivan did not go as planned to Colorado Springs
and should be reimbursed the
amount of $242.17 for those charges that were billed to her American
Express.
Thank you,
Heather Choate, x33278
|
Tim: thanks for the info. We will follow this from now on. |
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 09:43
AM ---------------------------
"Mark Hawkins" <[email protected]> on 12/01/2000 09:20:31 AM
Please respond to "Mark Hawkins" <[email protected]>
To: "Randy Gay" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: San Juan Volumes
Randy,
Please submit a fixed price bid to purchase the following Blanco volumes:
Thanks,
Mark Hawkins
Mercado Gas Services
512-370-8225
Month of Monthly
Delivery Quantity
Jan-01 520,000
Feb-01 458,000
Mar-01 363,000
Apr-01 268,000
May-01 184,000
Jun-01 144,000
Jul-01 143,000
Aug-01 156,000
Sep-01 158,000
Oct-01 240,000
Nov-01 357,000
Dec-01 455,000
Jan-02 526,000
Feb-02 466,000
Mar-02 370,000
Apr-02 274,000
May-02 188,000
Jun-02 142,000
Jul-02 147,000
Aug-02 161,000
5,720,000
|
Chris,
Nancy and Mary took the budget news well. Their response was "I don't care
what the number is as long as the sponsors are stepping up for it."
Frank also did not object. Unfortunately, they are saying that the CCT/CUST
interconnection issue must be resolved before funding. Their concern is that
if we sign then EPE will be subject to third party liability with members of
the grid. They are willing to meet with us next week on the budget and the
ECA but Cliff is not availble until Thursday. Can you make it later in the
week?
I'll keep you posted.
"Dutton, Chris CMJ SI-GPBF" <[email protected]> on 12/05/2000
07:54:40 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: CALL FROM ROB GAY ON WEDNESDAY
Rob,
I will be in a meeting most of the day but do call as it sounds urgent. My
office line is redirected to my cell phone.
> Regards,
>
> Chris Dutton, GPBF
>
> Finance Adviser
> Shell International Gas Limited
> Shell Centre London SE1 7NA
> Tel: +44 207 934 6110
> Fax: +44 207 934 7515
> Mobile: +44 7884 475053
> E-Mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> ----------
> From: [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: 05 December 2000 19:58
> To: Dutton, Chris CMJ SI-GPBF
> Subject: CALL FROM ROB GAY ON WEDNESDAY
>
> Chris:
>
> Rob wanted me to let you know to expect a call from him tomorrow,
> Wednesday, about 8:00 a.m. (2:00p London).
>
> Blanca
>
|
Bob: The problem we were having is that if they could get in, it would lock
them up for up to 5 minutes and then kick them out. This would happen over
and over again. They said it was alright from 7:30 to 8:30 am, then became
unusable about 8:30. It has gotten to the point that on most days when they
get cut off and they have to log back in they do not even consider this a
problem. We need to get back to exceptional service so they do not have to
keep logging back in. Thanks Bob. |
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 11:55
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Kenneth Shulklapper 09/21/2000 10:20 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------
"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <[email protected]> on 09/21/2000 06:47:47 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
NIce Man! Especially #10
Blowjob Etiquette For Men, From Women:
> > 1. First and foremost, we are not obligated to do it.
> >
> > 2. Extension to rule #1 - So if you get one, be grateful.
> >
> > 3. I don't care WHAT they did in the porn video you
> > saw, it is not standard practice to cum on someone's
> > face.
> >
> > 4. Extension to rule #3 - No, I DON'T have to swallow.
> >
> > 5. My ears are NOT handles.
> >
> > 6. Extension to rule #5 - do not push on the top of
> > my head. Last I heard, deep throat had been done. And
> > additionally, do you really WANT puke on your dick?
> >
> > 7. I don't care HOW relaxed you get, it is NEVER OK
> > to fart.
> >
> > 8. Having my period does not mean that it's "hummer
> > week" - get it through your head - I'm bloated and I
> > feel like shit so no, I don't feel particularly obligated
> > to blow you just because YOU can't have sex right now.
> >
> > 9. Extension to #8 - "Blue Balls" might have worked
> > on high school girls - if you're that desperate, go
> > jerk off and leave me alone with my Midol.
> >
> > 10. If I have to pause to remove a pubic hair from my
> > teeth, don't tell me I've just "wrecked it" for you.
> >
> > 11. Leaving me in bed while you go play video games
> > immediately afterwards is highly inadvisable if you
> > would like my behavior to be repeated in the future.
> >
> > 12. If you like how we do it, it's probably best not
> > to speculate about the origins of our talent. Just enjoy
> > the moment and be happy that we're good at it. See also
> > rule #2 about gratitude.
> >
> > 13. No, it doesn't particularly taste good. And I don't
> > care about the protein content.
> >
> > 14. No, I will NOT do it while you watch TV.
> >
> > 15. When you hear your friends complain about how they
> > don't get blowjobs often enough, keep your mouth shut.
> > It is inappropriate to either sympathize or brag.
|
Sabra: so thank you for giving blood, which means as much to me as the
playground equipment. Your support has been like everyone else's,
overwhelming. Take care.
Randy |
Phillip: I agree with your conclusions, and we have already started
addressing most of these issues.
First of all, I would like to say that all of the schedulers are performing
at a high level, except for Hillary and Jan. We have formally addressed
Hillary's performance problems, and he is on a schedule for improvement or
he is out. We have informally addressed Jan's performance issues with her,
and next week intend to formalize that also. That Jan makes more than anyone
else in the group makes her situation quite critical in my eyes, because we
are not getting a return on that investment.
The rest of the group is paid based on lots of factors that you are already
aware of, years of service, years in scheduling, level of performance, etc.
In Stacey's particular case, I am recommending her for promotion at the end
of the year, which will bump her pay scale up and make her pay more equitable
with her job performance. Also, I intend to help smooth over other
inequities through the bonus pool.
In regards to Patti, I have recommended her for a bonus for her service
during the rough time we've had when we were understaffed. Bob Superty has
supported this, and the information you provided him this last week should
help in that endeavour. Patti has had her pay increased this year after a
salary survey was performed by our HR group. I would like to point out that
Patti is pretty well paid for someone with her experience level. Also, Patti
would move up in the pay scale if she is promoted to Manager. I am not sure
what the exact plan is for Patti and myself as far as how that will go. I
would like to say that I feel more comfortable being back as each day goes
on, and am ready to make a move to trading anytime now if that is what you
and Mike still want to do.
As regards to the new hires: yes, we can hire more like these at these
prices. We would love to have employees like Matt, and Ted and Shelly,
especially at these prices. Patti did an excellent job hiring these
individuals. We have already started the process of looking for more like
these to start backfilling in for Hillary and Jan. We also need to hire more
for establishing a bigger physical presence in the west. We probably need to
sit down and go over with you and Mike as to what kind of plans you have for
expanding the desk.
Finally, I would like to bring up that Lucci has requested that the Denver
office do all nominations for IM Denver deals. This has met stiff resistance
in the past, and I do not know how ya'll feel about it, but I promised that I
would bring it up. I personally feel that Denver and CIG would be isolated
from us if the operations were to move to Denver.
If you have additional questions or comments please let me know. Thanks.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 10:36
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Kenneth Shulklapper 09/21/2000 10:20 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------
"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <[email protected]> on 09/21/2000 06:47:47 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
NIce Man! Especially #10
Blowjob Etiquette For Men, From Women:
> > 1. First and foremost, we are not obligated to do it.
> >
> > 2. Extension to rule #1 - So if you get one, be grateful.
> >
> > 3. I don't care WHAT they did in the porn video you
> > saw, it is not standard practice to cum on someone's
> > face.
> >
> > 4. Extension to rule #3 - No, I DON'T have to swallow.
> >
> > 5. My ears are NOT handles.
> >
> > 6. Extension to rule #5 - do not push on the top of
> > my head. Last I heard, deep throat had been done. And
> > additionally, do you really WANT puke on your dick?
> >
> > 7. I don't care HOW relaxed you get, it is NEVER OK
> > to fart.
> >
> > 8. Having my period does not mean that it's "hummer
> > week" - get it through your head - I'm bloated and I
> > feel like shit so no, I don't feel particularly obligated
> > to blow you just because YOU can't have sex right now.
> >
> > 9. Extension to #8 - "Blue Balls" might have worked
> > on high school girls - if you're that desperate, go
> > jerk off and leave me alone with my Midol.
> >
> > 10. If I have to pause to remove a pubic hair from my
> > teeth, don't tell me I've just "wrecked it" for you.
> >
> > 11. Leaving me in bed while you go play video games
> > immediately afterwards is highly inadvisable if you
> > would like my behavior to be repeated in the future.
> >
> > 12. If you like how we do it, it's probably best not
> > to speculate about the origins of our talent. Just enjoy
> > the moment and be happy that we're good at it. See also
> > rule #2 about gratitude.
> >
> > 13. No, it doesn't particularly taste good. And I don't
> > care about the protein content.
> >
> > 14. No, I will NOT do it while you watch TV.
> >
> > 15. When you hear your friends complain about how they
> > don't get blowjobs often enough, keep your mouth shut.
> > It is inappropriate to either sympathize or brag.
|
Robin I have a conflict with this date because this is the time for the
Global Finance PRC which I will need to attend. Thanks.
Robin L Treadwell
11/29/2000 07:50 AM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Connie F Estrems/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], Maria Ines Granado/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael
Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Federico
Cerisoli/SA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Hopper@Transredes, Roderick Blackham/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricky Lynn
Waddell/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Fernanda Fernandes/SA/Enron@Enron, Miguel Padron/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen E
Campos/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: URGENT - PRC MEETING INFORMATION
AS A REMINDER,
YOU ARE SCHEDULED TO ATTEND THE ESA DIRECTOR/GM PRC MEETING AS A COMMITTEE
MEMBER.
MEETING INFORMATION
Thursday, November 30
8:00 a.m. Houston, Conf Rm 3AC-14C2
11:00 a.m. Buenos Aires, Conf Rm
12:00 p.m. Sao Paulo, Conf Rm 6C3
Video Conference w/Sao Paulo, Houston, Buenos Aires
AT&T Dial In
From U.S. 1-877-322-9648
Outside U.S. 1-954-797-0718
Access Code 458290
If you have any questions, please call me at 713/646-7895.
Thank you
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 10:28
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Kenneth Shulklapper 09/21/2000 10:20 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------
"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <[email protected]> on 09/21/2000 06:47:47 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun
NIce Man! Especially #10
Blowjob Etiquette For Men, From Women:
> > 1. First and foremost, we are not obligated to do it.
> >
> > 2. Extension to rule #1 - So if you get one, be grateful.
> >
> > 3. I don't care WHAT they did in the porn video you
> > saw, it is not standard practice to cum on someone's
> > face.
> >
> > 4. Extension to rule #3 - No, I DON'T have to swallow.
> >
> > 5. My ears are NOT handles.
> >
> > 6. Extension to rule #5 - do not push on the top of
> > my head. Last I heard, deep throat had been done. And
> > additionally, do you really WANT puke on your dick?
> >
> > 7. I don't care HOW relaxed you get, it is NEVER OK
> > to fart.
> >
> > 8. Having my period does not mean that it's "hummer
> > week" - get it through your head - I'm bloated and I
> > feel like shit so no, I don't feel particularly obligated
> > to blow you just because YOU can't have sex right now.
> >
> > 9. Extension to #8 - "Blue Balls" might have worked
> > on high school girls - if you're that desperate, go
> > jerk off and leave me alone with my Midol.
> >
> > 10. If I have to pause to remove a pubic hair from my
> > teeth, don't tell me I've just "wrecked it" for you.
> >
> > 11. Leaving me in bed while you go play video games
> > immediately afterwards is highly inadvisable if you
> > would like my behavior to be repeated in the future.
> >
> > 12. If you like how we do it, it's probably best not
> > to speculate about the origins of our talent. Just enjoy
> > the moment and be happy that we're good at it. See also
> > rule #2 about gratitude.
> >
> > 13. No, it doesn't particularly taste good. And I don't
> > care about the protein content.
> >
> > 14. No, I will NOT do it while you watch TV.
> >
> > 15. When you hear your friends complain about how they
> > don't get blowjobs often enough, keep your mouth shut.
> > It is inappropriate to either sympathize or brag.
|