Datasets:

GleghornLab

/

abstract_domain_cvd

like 0

Follow

Gleghorn Lab 6

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in public health measures and health care reconfigurations likely to have impact on chronic disease care.,We aimed to assess the volume and characteristics of patients presenting to hospitals with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic compared with a time-matched 2019 cohort.,Patients presenting to hospitals with ADHF from March 1, to April 19, 2020 and 2019 in an urban hospital were examined.,Multivariable logistic-regression models were used to evaluate the difference in probability of ADHF-related hospitalization between the 2 years.,During the COVID-19 pandemic, a total of 1106 emergency department (ED) visits for dyspnea or peripheral edema were recorded, compared with 800 ED visits in 2019.,A decrease in ADHF-related ED visits of 43.5% (14.8%-79.4%, P = 0.002) and ADHF-related admissions of 39.3% (8.6%-78.5%, P = 0.009) was observed compared with 2019.,Patients with ADHF presenting to hospitals (n = 128) were similar in age, sex, and comorbidities compared with the 2019 cohort (n = 186); however, a higher proportion had recent diagnoses of heart failure.,Upon ED presentation, the relative probability of hospitalization or admission to intensive care was not statistically different.,There was a trend toward higher in-hospital mortality in 2020.,The decline in ADHF-related hospitalizations raises the timely question of how patients with heart failure are managing beyond the acute-care setting and reinforces the need for public education on the availability and safety of emergency services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients.,Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.,All patients referred to 4 intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 between March 3rd and 31st 2020 were included.,Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected.,Propensity score matching was performed to analyze the occurrence of thromboembolic events between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients.,150 COVID-19 patients were included (122 men, median age 63 [53; 71] years, SAPSII 49 [37; 64] points).,Sixty-four clinically relevant thrombotic complications were diagnosed in 150 patients, mainly pulmonary embolisms (16.7%). 28/29 patients (96.6%) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy experienced circuit clotting.,Three thrombotic occlusions (in 2 patients) of centrifugal pump occurred in 12 patients (8%) supported by ECMO.,Most patients (> 95%) had elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen.,No patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation.,Von Willebrand (vWF) activity, vWF antigen and FVIII were considerably increased, and 50/57 tested patients (87.7%) had positive lupus anticoagulant.,Comparison with non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 145) confirmed that COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 77) developed significantly more thrombotic complications, mainly pulmonary embolisms (11.7 vs.,2.1%, p < 0.008).,Coagulation parameters significantly differed between the two groups.,Despite anticoagulation, a high number of patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 developed life-threatening thrombotic complications.,Higher anticoagulation targets than in usual critically ill patients should therefore probably be suggested.,The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06062-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

This case series study evaluates the association of underlying cardiovascular disease and myocardial injury on fatal outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,What is the impact of underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) and myocardial injury on fatal outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?,In this case series study of 187 patients with COVID-19, 27.8% of patients had myocardial injury, which resulted in cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias.,Myocardial injury has a significant association with fatal outcome of COVID-19, while the prognosis of patients with underlying CVD but without myocardial injury were relatively favorable.,It is reasonable to triage patients with COVID-19 according to the presence of underlying CVD and evidence of myocardial injury for prioritized treatment and even more aggressive strategies.,Increasing numbers of confirmed cases and mortality rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are occurring in several countries and continents.,Information regarding the impact of cardiovascular complication on fatal outcome is scarce.,To evaluate the association of underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) and myocardial injury with fatal outcomes in patients with COVID-19.,This retrospective single-center case series analyzed patients with COVID-19 at the Seventh Hospital of Wuhan City, China, from January 23, 2020, to February 23, 2020.,Analysis began February 25, 2020.,Demographic data, laboratory findings, comorbidities, and treatments were collected and analyzed in patients with and without elevation of troponin T (TnT) levels.,Among 187 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 144 patients (77%) were discharged and 43 patients (23%) died.,The mean (SD) age was 58.50 (14.66) years.,Overall, 66 (35.3%) had underlying CVD including hypertension, coronary heart disease, and cardiomyopathy, and 52 (27.8%) exhibited myocardial injury as indicated by elevated TnT levels.,The mortality during hospitalization was 7.62% (8 of 105) for patients without underlying CVD and normal TnT levels, 13.33% (4 of 30) for those with underlying CVD and normal TnT levels, 37.50% (6 of 16) for those without underlying CVD but elevated TnT levels, and 69.44% (25 of 36) for those with underlying CVD and elevated TnTs.,Patients with underlying CVD were more likely to exhibit elevation of TnT levels compared with the patients without CVD (36 [54.5%] vs 16 [13.2%]).,Plasma TnT levels demonstrated a high and significantly positive linear correlation with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (β = 0.530, P < .001) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (β = 0.613, P < .001).,Plasma TnT and NT-proBNP levels during hospitalization (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 0.307 [0.094-0.600]; 1902.00 [728.35-8100.00]) and impending death (median [IQR], 0.141 [0.058-0.860]; 5375 [1179.50-25695.25]) increased significantly compared with admission values (median [IQR], 0.0355 [0.015-0.102]; 796.90 [401.93-1742.25]) in patients who died (P = .001; P < .001), while no significant dynamic changes of TnT (median [IQR], 0.010 [0.007-0.019]; 0.013 [0.007-0.022]; 0.011 [0.007-0.016]) and NT-proBNP (median [IQR], 352.20 [174.70-636.70]; 433.80 [155.80-1272.60]; 145.40 [63.4-526.50]) was observed in survivors (P = .96; P = .16).,During hospitalization, patients with elevated TnT levels had more frequent malignant arrhythmias, and the use of glucocorticoid therapy (37 [71.2%] vs 69 [51.1%]) and mechanical ventilation (31 [59.6%] vs 14 [10.4%]) were higher compared with patients with normal TnT levels.,The mortality rates of patients with and without use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers was 36.8% (7 of 19) and 21.4% (36 of 168) (P = .13).,Myocardial injury is significantly associated with fatal outcome of COVID-19, while the prognosis of patients with underlying CVD but without myocardial injury is relatively favorable.,Myocardial injury is associated with cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias.,Inflammation may be a potential mechanism for myocardial injury.,Aggressive treatment may be considered for patients at high risk of myocardial injury.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may predispose to venous thromboembolism.,We determined factors independently associated with computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE) in hospitalised severe COVID-19 patients.,Among all (n=349) patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in a university hospital in a French region with a high rate of COVID-19, we analysed patients who underwent CTPA for clinical signs of severe disease (oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry ≤93% or breathing rate ≥30 breaths·min−1) or rapid clinical worsening.,Multivariable analysis was performed using Firth penalised maximum likelihood estimates.,162 (46.4%) patients underwent CTPA (mean±sd age 65.6±13.0 years; 67.3% male (95% CI 59.5-75.5%).,PE was diagnosed in 44 (27.2%) patients.,Most PEs were segmental and the rate of PE-related right ventricular dysfunction was 15.9%.,By multivariable analysis, the only two significant predictors of CTPA-confirmed PE were D-dimer level and the lack of any anticoagulant therapy (OR 4.0 (95% CI 2.4-6.7) per additional quartile and OR 4.5 (95% CI 1.1-7.4), respectively).,Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a D-dimer cut-off value of 2590 ng·mL−1 to best predict occurrence of PE (area under the curve 0.88, p<0.001, sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 83.8%).,D-dimer level >2590 ng·mL−1 was associated with a 17-fold increase in the adjusted risk of PE.,Elevated D-dimers (>2590 ng·mL−1) and absence of anticoagulant therapy predict PE in hospitalised COVID-19 patients with clinical signs of severity.,These data strengthen the evidence base in favour of systematic anticoagulation, and suggest wider use of D-dimer guided CTPA to screen for PE in acutely ill hospitalised patients with COVID-19.,We studied predictors of pulmonary embolism in severe COVID-19 and found that D-dimer level and lack of any anticoagulant therapy were associated with a 17-fold and four-fold increase in PE, respectively, in COVID-19 patients with clinical signs of severityhttps://bit.ly/2ETfAfo

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 that has significant implications for the cardiovascular care of patients.,First, those with COVID-19 and pre-existing cardiovascular disease have an increased risk of severe disease and death.,Second, infection has been associated with multiple direct and indirect cardiovascular complications including acute myocardial injury, myocarditis, arrhythmias, and venous thromboembolism.,Third, therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have cardiovascular side effects.,Fourth, the response to COVID-19 can compromise the rapid triage of non-COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular conditions.,Finally, the provision of cardiovascular care may place health care workers in a position of vulnerability as they become hosts or vectors of virus transmission.,We hereby review the peer-reviewed and pre-print reports pertaining to cardiovascular considerations related to COVID-19 and highlight gaps in knowledge that require further study pertinent to patients, health care workers, and health systems.,•Patients with pre-existing CVD appear to have worse outcomes with COVID-19.,•CV complications include biomarker elevations, myocarditis, heart failure, and venous thromboembolism, which may be exacerbated by delays in care.,•Therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have significant drug-drug interactions with CV medications.,•Health care workers and health systems should take measures to ensure safety while providing high-quality care for COVID-19 patients.,Patients with pre-existing CVD appear to have worse outcomes with COVID-19.,CV complications include biomarker elevations, myocarditis, heart failure, and venous thromboembolism, which may be exacerbated by delays in care.,Therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have significant drug-drug interactions with CV medications.,Health care workers and health systems should take measures to ensure safety while providing high-quality care for COVID-19 patients.

Studies have reminded that cardiovascular metabolic comorbidities made patients more susceptible to suffer 2019 novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) disease (COVID-19), and exacerbated the infection.,The aim of this analysis is to determine the association of cardiovascular metabolic diseases with the development of COVID-19.,A meta-analysis of eligible studies that summarized the prevalence of cardiovascular metabolic diseases in COVID-19 and compared the incidences of the comorbidities in ICU/severe and non-ICU/severe patients was performed.,Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant studies.,A total of six studies with 1527 patients were included in this analysis.,The proportions of hypertension, cardia-cerebrovascular disease and diabetes in patients with COVID-19 were 17.1%, 16.4% and 9.7%, respectively.,The incidences of hypertension, cardia-cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes were about twofolds, threefolds and twofolds, respectively, higher in ICU/severe cases than in their non-ICU/severe counterparts.,At least 8.0% patients with COVID-19 suffered the acute cardiac injury.,The incidence of acute cardiac injury was about 13 folds higher in ICU/severe patients compared with the non-ICU/severe patients.,Patients with previous cardiovascular metabolic diseases may face a greater risk of developing into the severe condition and the comorbidities can also greatly affect the prognosis of the COVID-19.,On the other hand, COVID-19 can, in turn, aggravate the damage to the heart.

Sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are indicated for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); some SGLT2i have reported cardiovascular benefit, and some have reported risk of below‐knee lower extremity (BKLE) amputation.,This study examined the real‐world comparative effectiveness within the SGLT2i class and compared with non‐SGLT2i antihyperglycaemic agents.,Data from 4 large US administrative claims databases were used to characterize risk and provide population‐level estimates of canagliflozin's effects on hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and BKLE amputation vs other SGLT2i and non‐SGLT2i in T2DM patients.,Comparative analyses using a propensity score-adjusted new‐user cohort design examined relative hazards of outcomes across all new users and a subpopulation with established cardiovascular disease.,Across the 4 databases (142 800 new users of canagliflozin, 110 897 new users of other SGLT2i, 460 885 new users of non‐SGLT2i), the meta‐analytic hazard ratio estimate for HHF with canagliflozin vs non‐SGLT2i was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.26‐0.60) in the on‐treatment analysis.,The estimate for BKLE amputation with canagliflozin vs non‐SGLT2i was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.40‐1.41) in the on‐treatment analysis and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.93‐1.10) in the intent‐to‐treat analysis.,Effects in the subpopulation with established cardiovascular disease were similar for both outcomes.,No consistent differences were observed between canagliflozin and other SGLT2i.,In this large comprehensive analysis, canagliflozin and other SGLT2i demonstrated HHF benefits consistent with clinical trial data, but showed no increased risk of BKLE amputation vs non‐SGLT2i.,HHF and BKLE amputation results were similar in the subpopulation with established cardiovascular disease.,This study helps further characterize the potential benefits and harms of SGLT2i in routine clinical practice to complement evidence from clinical trials and prior observational studies.

The primary aim of the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study‐Renal (CANVAS‐R) is to determine whether the favourable effects of inhibition of the sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2) on blood glucose, blood pressure and body weight are accompanied by protection against adverse renal outcomes.,CANVAS‐R is a prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes with a history or high risk of cardiovascular events.,Patients were randomly assigned to once‐daily placebo or canagliflozin 100 mg (with optional uptitration to 300 mg) for a planned average of 2.5 years of follow‐up.,The primary outcome is kidney disease progression, defined by class change in albuminuria.,The two secondary outcomes are the composite of hospitalized heart failure or cardiovascular death, and cardiovascular death alone.,Effects on end‐stage renal disease and a range of other outcomes will also be explored.,A total of 5812 participants were recruited at 422 sites in 24 countries between January 2014 and May 2015.,The mean baseline age was 64 years, mean duration of diabetes was 14 years, mean glycated haemoglobin level was 8.3% and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2.,Of these participants, 37% were women, 71% had a history of cardiovascular disease, 22.3% had microalbuminuria and 8.7% had macroalbuminuria.,The mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 76 mL/min/1.73 m2.,The study will have at least 90% power ( P = .05) to detect a 22% or greater reduction in the risk of progression of albuminuria.,The trial should define the potential renoprotective effect of canagliflozin and will provide additional important new data about its effects on vascular outcomes, death and kidney failure.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications.,To investigate the incidence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Single‐center cohort study of 198 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Seventy‐five patients (38%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).,At time of data collection, 16 (8%) were still hospitalized and 19% had died.,During a median follow‐up of 7 days (IQR, 3‐13), 39 patients (20%) were diagnosed with VTE of whom 25 (13%) had symptomatic VTE, despite routine thrombosis prophylaxis.,The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days were 16% (95% CI, 10‐22), 33% (95% CI, 23‐43) and 42% (95% CI 30‐54) respectively.,For symptomatic VTE, these were 10% (95% CI, 5.8‐16), 21% (95% CI, 14‐30) and 25% (95% CI 16‐36).,VTE appeared to be associated with death (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.02‐5.5).,The cumulative incidence of VTE was higher in the ICU (26% (95% CI, 17‐37), 47% (95% CI, 34‐58), and 59% (95% CI, 42‐72) at 7, 14 and 21 days) than on the wards (any VTE and symptomatic VTE 5.8% (95% CI, 1.4‐15), 9.2% (95% CI, 2.6‐21), and 9.2% (2.6‐21) at 7, 14, and 21 days).,The observed risk for VTE in COVID‐19 is high, particularly in ICU patients, which should lead to a high level of clinical suspicion and low threshold for diagnostic imaging for DVT or PE.,Future research should focus on optimal diagnostic and prophylactic strategies to prevent VTE and potentially improve survival.

A novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan has caused an outbreak and become a major public health issue in China and great concern from international community.,Myocarditis and myocardial injury were suspected and may even be considered as one of the leading causes for death of COVID-19 patients.,Therefore, we focused on the condition of the heart, and sought to provide firsthand evidence for whether myocarditis and myocardial injury were caused by COVID-19.,We enrolled patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 retrospectively and collected heart-related clinical data, mainly including cardiac imaging findings, laboratory results and clinical outcomes.,Serial tests of cardiac markers were traced for the analysis of potential myocardial injury/myocarditis.,112 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in our study.,There was evidence of myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients and 14 (12.5%) patients had presented abnormalities similar to myocarditis.,Most of patients had normal levels of troponin at admission, that in 42 (37.5%) patients increased during hospitalization, especially in those that died.,Troponin levels were significantly increased in the week preceding the death.,15 (13.4%) patients have presented signs of pulmonary hypertension.,Typical signs of myocarditis were absent on echocardiography and electrocardiogram.,The clinical evidence in our study suggested that myocardial injury is more likely related to systemic consequences rather than direct damage by the 2019 novel coronavirus.,The elevation in cardiac markers was probably due to secondary and systemic consequences and can be considered as the warning sign for recent adverse clinical outcomes of the patients.,•The evidence from clinical standpoint and front-line data in Wuhan for COVID-19.,•The novel coronavirus in COVID-19 less likely caused myocardial injury directly.,•Elevation in cardiac markers is the warning sign of adverse outcomes for COVID-19.,The evidence from clinical standpoint and front-line data in Wuhan for COVID-19.,The novel coronavirus in COVID-19 less likely caused myocardial injury directly.,Elevation in cardiac markers is the warning sign of adverse outcomes for COVID-19.

We previously showed that the protective effects of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)‐released exosomes (EPC‐EXs) on endothelium in diabetes.,However, whether EPC‐EXs are protective in diabetic ischemic stroke is unknown.,Here, we investigated the effects of EPC‐EXs on diabetic stroke mice and tested whether miR‐126 enriched EPC‐EXs (EPC‐EXsmiR126) have enhanced efficacy.,The db/db mice subjected to ischemic stroke were intravenously administrated with EPC‐EXs 2 hours after ischemic stroke.,The infarct volume, cerebral microvascular density (MVD), cerebral blood flow (CBF), neurological function, angiogenesis and neurogenesis, and levels of cleaved caspase‐3, miR‐126, and VEGFR2 were measured on day 2 and 14.,We found that (a) injected EPC‐EXs merged with brain endothelial cells, neurons, astrocytes, and microglia in the peri‐infarct area; (b) EPC‐EXsmiR126 were more effective than EPC‐EXs in decreasing infarct size and increasing CBF and MVD, and in promoting angiogenesis and neurogenesis as well as neurological functional recovery; (c) These effects were accompanied with downregulated cleaved caspase‐3 on day 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) upregulation till day 14.,Our results indicate that enrichment of miR126 enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of EPC‐EXs on diabetic ischemic stroke by attenuating acute injury and promoting neurological function recovery.,Schematic shows the mechanism of EPC‐EXsmiR‐126 on treating ischemic stroke in diabetes.,Overexpression of miR‐126 enhanced the therapeutic effects of EPC‐EXs on diabetic ischemic stroke by reducing cell apoptosis in acute phase and promoting angiogenesis and neurogenesis to promote neurological function recovery in chronic phase.

Stem cells have demonstrated encouraging potential as reparative therapy for patients suffering from post-stroke disability.,Reperfusion interventions in the acute phase of stroke have shown significant benefit but are limited by a narrow window of opportunity in which they are beneficial.,Thereafter, rehabilitation is the only intervention available.,The current review summarises the current evidence for use of stem cell therapies in stroke from early-phase clinical trials.,The safety and feasibility of administering different types of stem cell therapies in stroke seem to be reasonably proven.,However, the effectiveness needs still to be established through bigger clinical trials with more pragmatic clinical trial designs that address the challenges raised by the heterogeneous nature of stroke per se, as well those due to unique characteristics of stem cells as therapeutic agents.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-017-0643-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Emergency measures to treat patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) and contain the outbreak is the main priority in each of our hospitals; however, these measures are likely to result in collateral damage among patients with other acute diseases.,Here, we investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic affects acute stroke care through interruptions in the stroke chain of survival.,A descriptive analysis of acute stroke care activity before and after the COVID-19 outbreak is given for a stroke network in southern Europe.,To quantify the impact of the pandemic, the number of stroke code activations, ambulance transfers, consultations through telestroke, stroke unit admissions, and reperfusion therapy times and rates are described in temporal relationship with the rising number of COVID-19 cases in the region.,Following confinement of the population, our stroke unit activity decreased sharply, with a 25% reduction in admitted cases (mean number of 58 cases every 15 days in previous months to 44 cases in the 15 days after the outbreak, P<0.001).,Consultations to the telestroke network declined from 25 every 15 days before the outbreak to 7 after the outbreak (P<0.001).,The increasing trend in the prehospital diagnosis of stroke activated by 911 calls stopped abruptly in the region, regressing to 2019 levels.,The mean number of stroke codes dispatched to hospitals decreased (78% versus 57%, P<0.001).,Time of arrival from symptoms onset to stroke units was delayed >30 minutes, reperfusion therapy cases fell, and door-to-needle time started 16 minutes later than usual.,The COVID-19 pandemic is disruptive for acute stroke pathways.,Bottlenecks in the access and delivery of patients to our secured stroke centers are among the main challenges.,It is critical to encourage patients to continue seeking emergency care if experiencing acute stroke symptoms and to ensure that emergency professionals continue to use stroke code activation and telestroke networks.

Hyperacute assessment and management of patients with stroke, termed code stroke, is a time-sensitive and high-stakes clinical scenario.,In the context of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the ability to deliver timely and efficacious care must be balanced with the risk of infectious exposure to the clinical team.,Furthermore, rapid and effective stroke care remains paramount to achieve maximal functional recovery for those needing admission and to triage care appropriately for those who may be presenting with neurological symptoms but have an alternative diagnosis.,Available resources, COVID-19-specific infection prevention and control recommendations, and expert consensus were used to identify clinical screening criteria for patients and provide the required nuanced considerations for the healthcare team, thereby modifying the conventional code stroke processes to achieve a protected designation.,A protected code stroke algorithm was developed.,Features specific to prenotification and clinical status of the patient were used to define precode screening.,These include primary infectious symptoms, clinical, and examination features.,A focused framework was then developed with regard to a protected code stroke.,We outline the specifics of personal protective equipment use and considerations thereof including aspects of crisis resource management impacting team role designation and human performance factors during a protected code stroke.,We introduce the concept of a protected code stroke during a pandemic, as in the case of COVID-19, and provide a framework for key considerations including screening, personal protective equipment, and crisis resource management.,These considerations and suggested algorithms can be utilized and adapted for local practice.

Recent studies have reported a high prevalence of thrombotic events in coronavirus disease 2019.,However, the significance of thromboembolic complications has not been widely appreciated.,The purpose of this review is to provide current knowledge of this serious problem.,Narrative review.,Online search of published medical literature through PubMed using the term “COVID-19,” “SARS,” “acute respiratory distress syndrome,” “coronavirus,” “coagulopathy,” “thrombus,” and “anticoagulants.”,Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to coagulopathy and thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019, and anticoagulant therapy.,Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.,Coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with a strikingly high prevalence of coagulopathy and venous thromboembolism that may contribute to respiratory deterioration.,Monitoring coagulation variables is important, as abnormal coagulation tests are related to adverse outcomes and may necessitate adjuvant antithrombotic interventions.,In the initial phase of the infection, d-dimer and fibrinogen levels are increased, while activated partial prothrombin time, prothrombin time, and platelet counts are often relatively normal.,Increased d-dimer levels three times the upper limit of normal may trigger screening for venous thromboembolism.,In all hospitalized patients, thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin is currently recommended.,The etiology of the procoagulant responses is complex and thought to be a result of specific interactions between host defense mechanisms and the coagulation system.,Although the coagulopathy is reminiscent of disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombotic microangiopathy, it has features that are markedly distinct from these entities.,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2/coronavirus disease 2019 frequently induces hypercoagulability with both microangiopathy and local thrombus formation, and a systemic coagulation defect that leads to large vessel thrombosis and major thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism in critically ill hospitalized patients. d-dimers and fibrinogen levels should be monitored, and all hospitalized patients should undergo thromboembolism prophylaxis with an increase in therapeutic anticoagulation in certain clinical situations.

We recently reported a high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of three Dutch hospitals.,In answering questions raised regarding our study, we updated our database and repeated all analyses.,We re-evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and/or systemic arterial embolism in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICUs of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital from ICU admission to death, ICU discharge or April 22nd 2020, whichever came first.,We studied the same 184 ICU patients as reported on previously, of whom a total of 41 died (22%) and 78 were discharged alive (43%).,The median follow-up duration increased from 7 to 14 days.,All patients received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.,The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome, adjusted for competing risk of death, was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41-57%).,The majority of thrombotic events were PE (65/75; 87%).,In the competing risk model, chronic anticoagulation therapy at admission was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.29, 95%CI 0.091-0.92).,Patients diagnosed with thrombotic complications were at higher risk of all-cause death (HR 5.4; 95%CI 2.4-12).,Use of therapeutic anticoagulation was not associated with all-cause death (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.35-1.8).,In this updated analysis, we confirm the very high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

The COVID-19 pandemic, the result of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2, is a major cause of worldwide mortality with a significant cardiovascular component.,While a number of different cardiovascular histopathologies have been reported at postmortem examination, their incidence is unknown, due to limited numbers of cases in any given study.,A literature review was performed identifying 277 autopsied hearts across 22 separate publications of COVID-19 positive patients.,The median age of the autopsy cohort was 75 and 97.6% had one or more comorbidities.,Initial review of the data indicate that myocarditis was present in 20 hearts (7.2%); however, closer examination of additional reported information revealed that most cases were likely not functionally significant and the true prevalence of myocarditis is likely much lower (<2%).,At least one acute, potentially COVID-19-related cardiovascular histopathologic finding, such as macro or microvascular thrombi, inflammation, or intraluminal megakaryocytes, was reported in 47.8% of cases.,Significant differences in reporting of histopathologic findings occurred between studies indicating strong biases in observations and the need for more consistency in reporting.,In conclusion, across 277 cases, COVID-19-related cardiac histopathological findings, are common, while myocarditis is rare.

To describe the cardiac abnormalities in patients with COVID-19 and identify the characteristics of patients who would benefit most from echocardiography.,In a prospective international survey, we captured echocardiography findings in patients with presumed or confirmed COVID-19 between 3 and 20 April 2020.,Patient characteristics, indications, findings, and impact of echocardiography on management were recorded.,Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of echocardiographic abnormalities.,A total of 1216 patients [62 (52-71) years, 70% male] from 69 countries across six continents were included.,Overall, 667 (55%) patients had an abnormal echocardiogram.,Left and right ventricular abnormalities were reported in 479 (39%) and 397 (33%) patients, respectively, with evidence of new myocardial infarction in 36 (3%), myocarditis in 35 (3%), and takotsubo cardiomyopathy in 19 (2%).,Severe cardiac disease (severe ventricular dysfunction or tamponade) was observed in 182 (15%) patients.,In those without pre-existing cardiac disease (n = 901), the echocardiogram was abnormal in 46%, and 13% had severe disease.,Independent predictors of left and right ventricular abnormalities were distinct, including elevated natriuretic peptides [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75-5.05) and cardiac troponin (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.13-2.53) for the former, and severity of COVID-19 symptoms (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.73-6.10) for the latter.,Echocardiography changed management in 33% of patients.,In this global survey, cardiac abnormalities were observed in half of all COVID-19 patients undergoing echocardiography.,Abnormalities were often unheralded or severe, and imaging changed management in one-third of patients.

Due to the overlapping clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza, parallels are often drawn between the two diseases.,Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are at a higher risk for severe manifestations of both illnesses.,Considering the high transmission rate of COVID-19 and with the seasonal influenza approaching in late 2020, the dual epidemics of COVID-19 and influenza pose serious cardiovascular implications.,This review highlights the similarities and differences between influenza and COVID-19 and the potential risks associated with coincident pandemics.,COVID-19 has a higher mortality compared to influenza with case fatality rate almost 15 times more than that of influenza.,Additionally, a significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes has been noted in patients with CVD, with ~ 15 to 70% of COVID-19 related deaths having an underlying CVD.,The critical care need have ranged from 5 to 79% of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19, a proportion substantially higher than with influenza.,Similarly, the frequency of vascular thrombosis including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is markedly higher in COVID-19 patients compared with influenza in which vascular complications are rarely seen.,Unexpectedly, while peak influenza season is associated with increased cardiovascular hospitalizations, a decrease of ~ 50% in cardiovascular hospitalizations has been observed since the first diagnosed case of COVID-19, owing in part to deferred care.,In the coming months, increasing efforts towards evaluating new interventions will be vital to curb COVID-19, especially as peak influenza season approaches.,Currently, not enough data exist regarding co-infection of COVID-19 with influenza or how it would progress clinically, though it may cause a significant burden on an already struggling health care system.,Until an effective COVID-19 vaccination is available, high coverage of influenza vaccination should be of utmost priority.

Myocardial injury is frequent among patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with a poor prognosis.,However, the mechanisms of myocardial injury remain unclear and prior studies have not reported cardiovascular imaging data.,This study sought to characterize the echocardiographic abnormalities associated with myocardial injury and their prognostic impact in patients with COVID-19.,We conducted an international, multicenter cohort study including 7 hospitals in New York City and Milan of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who had undergone transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) and electrocardiographic evaluation during their index hospitalization.,Myocardial injury was defined as any elevation in cardiac troponin at the time of clinical presentation or during the hospitalization.,A total of 305 patients were included.,Mean age was 63 years and 205 patients (67.2%) were male.,Overall, myocardial injury was observed in 190 patients (62.3%).,Compared with patients without myocardial injury, those with myocardial injury had more electrocardiographic abnormalities, higher inflammatory biomarkers and an increased prevalence of major echocardiographic abnormalities that included left ventricular wall motion abnormalities, global left ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction grade II or III, right ventricular dysfunction and pericardial effusions.,Rates of in-hospital mortality were 5.2%, 18.6%, and 31.7% in patients without myocardial injury, with myocardial injury without TTE abnormalities, and with myocardial injury and TTE abnormalities.,Following multivariable adjustment, myocardial injury with TTE abnormalities was associated with higher risk of death but not myocardial injury without TTE abnormalities.,Among patients with COVID-19 who underwent TTE, cardiac structural abnormalities were present in nearly two-thirds of patients with myocardial injury.,Myocardial injury was associated with increased in-hospital mortality particularly if echocardiographic abnormalities were present.

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) has neuroprotective effects and the ability to resist amyloidosis.,This study observed the protective effect of EGCG against neuronal injury in rat models of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and investigated the mechanism of action of PI3K/AKT/eNOS signaling pathway.,Rat models of permanent MCAO were established using the suture method.,Rat behavior was measured using neurological deficit score.,Pathology and apoptosis were measured using HE staining and TUNEL.,Oxidative stress and brain injury markers were examined using ELISA.,Apoptosis-related proteins and PI3K/AKT/eNOS signaling pathway were determined using western blot assay and immunohistochemistry.,EGCG decreased neurological function score, protected nerve cells, inhibited neuronal apoptosis, and inhibited oxidative stress injury and brain injury markers level after MCAO.,EGCG reduced the apoptotic rate of neurons, increased the expression of Bcl-2, and decreased the expression of Caspase-3 and Bax.,After LY294002 suppressed the PI3K pathway, the protective effect of EGCG decreased after administration of PI3K inhibitors.,EGCG has a protective effect on rat brain injury induced by MCAO, possibly by modulating the PI3K/AKT/eNOS signaling pathway.

We aimed to investigate the effect and mechanisms of tanshinone (TSN) IIA in cerebral infarction.,The cerebral infarction rat model was established by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO).,After pretreatment with TSN, cerebral infarct volume, cerebral edema, and neurological deficits score were evaluated, as well as cell apoptosis in hippocampus and cortex of the brain was examined with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).,In addition, rat primary neuronal cells were isolated and cultured in oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) conditions.,After pretreatment with TSN, cell viability and apoptosis were observed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and flow cytometry analysis, respectively.,The expressions of Bax and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) were detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blotting.,Compared with untreated cerebral infarction rat, TSN treatment significantly reduced cerebral infarct volume, cerebral edema, and neurological deficits score (P < 0.05).,Cell apoptosis as well as the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in hippocampus and cortex of cerebral infarction rat were inhibited after pretreatment with TSN (P < 0.05).,Furthermore, TSN remarkably increased cell viability and inhibited cell apoptosis ratio (P < 0.05) in OGD-induced rat neuronal cells.,Besides, TSN significantly downregulated the expression of Bax and upregulated Bcl-2 (P < 0.05).,TSN IIA has a preventive effect on cerebral infarction by inhibiting neuronal cell apoptosis and inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo.

To investigate possible relationships between pre-existing medical conditions (including common comorbidities and chronic medications) and risk for suffering COVID-19 disease in middle-aged and older adults.,Population-based retrospective cohort study.,Twelve primary care centres (PCCs) in Tarragona (Spain).,79 083 people (77 676 community-dwelling and 1407 nursing-home residents), who were all individuals aged >50 years affiliated to the 12 participating PCCs.,Baseline cohort characteristics (age, sex, vaccinations, comorbidities and chronic medications) were established at study start (1st.,March 2020) and primary outcome was time to COVID-19 confirmed by PCR among cohort members throughout the epidemic period (from 1st.,March 2020 to 23rd.,May 2020).,Risk for suffering COVID-19 was evaluated by Cox regression, estimating multivariable HRs adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities and medications use.,During the study period, 2324 cohort members were PCR-tested, with 1944 negative and 380 positive results, which means an incidence of 480.5 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases per 100 000 persons-period.,Assessing the total study cohort, only age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03; p=0.002), nursing-home residence (HR 21.83; 95% CI 16.66 to 28.61; p<0.001) and receiving diuretics (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.76; p=0.026) appeared independently associated with increased risk.,Smoking (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.93; p=0.022), ACE inhibitors (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.99; p=0.046) and antihistamine (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.01; p=0.052) were associated with a lower risk.,Among community-dwelling individuals, cancer (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.24; p=0.035), chronic respiratory disease (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.08 to 3.07; p=0.025) and cardiac disease (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.19; p=0.021) emerged to be also associated with an increased risk.,Receiving ACE inhibitors (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.99; p=0.046) and influenza vaccination (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.91; p=0.012) was associated with decreased risk.,Age, nursing-home residence and multiple comorbidities appear predisposing for COVID-19.,Conversely, receiving ACE inhibitors, antihistamine and influenza vaccination could be protective, which should be closely investigated in further studies specifically focused on these concerns.

Concerns have been raised about the possible harmfulness of angiotensin-converter enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and aldosterone receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with COVID-19.,However, few data from a European population have been published, especially from hypertensive patients.,To study the association between ACEi or ARB treatments and major adverse outcomes during hospitalisation in COVID-19 patients.,We studied 545 consecutive hypertensive patients admitted to our institution due to COVID-19 with respiratory involvement.,We analysed the incidence of combined event (death or mechanical ventilatory support) during hospitalisation, as well as the time to independent events.,188 (34.5%) patients presented the combined endpoint.,182 (33.4%) patients died, and 21 (3.9%) needed mechanical ventilatory support.,Patients with previous treatment with ACEi or ARB presented similar incidence of the combined endpoint during hospitalisation (31.6% vs.,41.8%; p = 0.08), with a lower all-cause mortality rate (30.4% vs.,41.2%; p = 0.03) compared with those without prior treatment.,Use of ACEi or ARB was not independently associated with lower incidence of the combined endpoint [Adjusted OR 0.675 (95% CI 0.298-1.528; p = 0.146)], but it was associated with lower mortality [Adjusted OR 0.550 (95% CI 0.304-0.930; p = 0.047)].,The use of ACEi or ARB was associated with less incidence of all-cause death during hospitalisation among hypertensive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection.,The online version of this article (10.1007/s40292-020-00409-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A new type of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks recently in China and spreads into many other countries.,This disease, named as COVID-19, is similar to patients infected by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and nearly 20% of patients developed severe condition.,Cardiac injury is a prevalent complication of severe patients, exacerbating the disease severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.,Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the key host cellular receptor of SARS-CoV-2, has been identified in multiple organs, but its cellular distribution in human heart is not illuminated clearly.,This study performed the first state-of-art single cell atlas of adult human heart, and revealed that pericytes with high expression of ACE2 might act as the target cardiac cell of SARS-CoV-2.,The pericytes injury due to virus infection may result in capillary endothelial cells dysfunction, inducing microvascular dysfunction.,And patients with basic heart failure disease showed increased ACE2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, meaning that if infected by the virus these patients may have higher risk of heart attack and critically ill condition.,The finding of this study explains the high rate of severe cases among COVID-19 patients with basic cardiovascular disease; and these results also perhaps provide important reference to clinical treatment of cardiac injury among severe patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Ever since the first case was reported at the end of 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a serious threat to public health globally in short time.,At this point in time, there is no proven effective therapy.,The interactions with concomitant disease are largely unknown, and that may be particularly pertinent to inherited arrhythmia syndrome.,An arrhythmogenic effect of COVID-19 can be expected, potentially contributing to disease outcome.,This may be of importance for patients with an increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias, either secondary to acquired conditions or comorbidities or consequent to inherited syndromes.,Management of patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes such as long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, short QT syndrome, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic may prove particularly challenging.,Depending on the inherited defect involved, these patients may be susceptible to proarrhythmic effects of COVID-19-related issues such as fever, stress, electrolyte disturbances, and use of antiviral drugs.,Here, we describe the potential COVID-19-associated risks and therapeutic considerations for patients with distinct inherited arrhythmia syndromes and provide recommendations, pending local possibilities, for their monitoring and management during this pandemic.

The severity of myocardial tissue damage following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) strongly determines short- and long-term prognosis.,This study explored the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and associated public health restrictions on infarct severity.,STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and included in the prospective Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (MARINA-STEMI) cohort study from 2015- 2020 (n = 474) were categorized according to (i) timeframes with and without major public health restrictions in 2020, and (ii) timeframes of major public health restrictions during 2020 and during the corresponding timeframes between 2015-2019.,Myocardial damage was evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.,During major public health restrictions in 2020 (n = 48), there was an increase in infarct size (22 [IQR 12-29] vs.,14 [IQR 6-23]%, P < 0.01), a higher frequency (77% vs.,52%, P < 0.01) and larger extent of microvascular obstruction (1.5 [IQR 0.1-11.4] vs.,0.2 [IQR 0.0-2.6]%, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of intramyocardial haemorrhage (56% vs.,34%, P = 0.02) as compared to the phases without major restrictions in 2020 (n = 101).,These findings were confirmed in adjusted analysis and were consistent when comparing patients admitted in 2020 versus patients admitted in the “pre-pandemic” era (2015-2019).,Patient characteristics were comparable between groups, except for a significantly longer total ischemia time (P < 0.01) and higher frequency of pre-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0 during times of major restrictions (P = 0.03).,This study provides novel mechanistic insights demonstrating a significant increase in myocardial damage in STEMI patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic with a temporal relation to major public health restrictions.,Graphical Abstract

Few data are available on the rate and characteristics of thromboembolic complications in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.,We studied consecutive symptomatic patients with laboratory-proven COVID-19 admitted to a university hospital in Milan, Italy (13.02.2020-10.04.2020).,The primary outcome was any thromboembolic complication, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/myocardial infarction (MI).,Secondary outcome was overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).,We included 388 patients (median age 66 years, 68% men, 16% requiring intensive care [ICU]).,Thromboprophylaxis was used in 100% of ICU patients and 75% of those on the general ward.,Thromboembolic events occurred in 28 (7.7% of closed cases; 95%CI 5.4%-11.0%), corresponding to a cumulative rate of 21% (27.6% ICU, 6.6% general ward).,Half of the thromboembolic events were diagnosed within 24 h of hospital admission.,Forty-four patients underwent VTE imaging tests and VTE was confirmed in 16 (36%).,Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was performed in 30 patients, corresponding to 7.7% of total, and pulmonary embolism was confirmed in 10 (33% of CTPA).,The rate of ischemic stroke and ACS/MI was 2.5% and 1.1%, respectively.,Overt DIC was present in 8 (2.2%) patients.,The high number of arterial and, in particular, venous thromboembolic events diagnosed within 24 h of admission and the high rate of positive VTE imaging tests among the few COVID-19 patients tested suggest that there is an urgent need to improve specific VTE diagnostic strategies and investigate the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory COVID-19 patients.,•COVID-19 is characterized by coagulation activation and endothelial dysfunction.,Few data are available on thromboembolic complications.,•We studied symptomatic patients with laboratory-proven COVID-19 admitted to a university hospital in Milan, Italy (13.02-10.04.2020).,•Venous and arterial thromboembolic events occurred in 8% of hospitalized patients (cumulative rate 21.0%) and 50% of events were diagnosed within 24 h of hospital admission.,•Forty-four (11% of total) patients underwent VTE imaging tests; 16 were positive (36% of tests), suggesting underestimation of thromboembolic complications.,•There is an urgent need to investigate VTE diagnostic strategies and the impact of thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory COVID-19 patients.,COVID-19 is characterized by coagulation activation and endothelial dysfunction.,Few data are available on thromboembolic complications.,We studied symptomatic patients with laboratory-proven COVID-19 admitted to a university hospital in Milan, Italy (13.02-10.04.2020).,Venous and arterial thromboembolic events occurred in 8% of hospitalized patients (cumulative rate 21.0%) and 50% of events were diagnosed within 24 h of hospital admission.,Forty-four (11% of total) patients underwent VTE imaging tests; 16 were positive (36% of tests), suggesting underestimation of thromboembolic complications.,There is an urgent need to investigate VTE diagnostic strategies and the impact of thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications.,To investigate the incidence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Single‐center cohort study of 198 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Seventy‐five patients (38%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).,At time of data collection, 16 (8%) were still hospitalized and 19% had died.,During a median follow‐up of 7 days (IQR, 3‐13), 39 patients (20%) were diagnosed with VTE of whom 25 (13%) had symptomatic VTE, despite routine thrombosis prophylaxis.,The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days were 16% (95% CI, 10‐22), 33% (95% CI, 23‐43) and 42% (95% CI 30‐54) respectively.,For symptomatic VTE, these were 10% (95% CI, 5.8‐16), 21% (95% CI, 14‐30) and 25% (95% CI 16‐36).,VTE appeared to be associated with death (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.02‐5.5).,The cumulative incidence of VTE was higher in the ICU (26% (95% CI, 17‐37), 47% (95% CI, 34‐58), and 59% (95% CI, 42‐72) at 7, 14 and 21 days) than on the wards (any VTE and symptomatic VTE 5.8% (95% CI, 1.4‐15), 9.2% (95% CI, 2.6‐21), and 9.2% (2.6‐21) at 7, 14, and 21 days).,The observed risk for VTE in COVID‐19 is high, particularly in ICU patients, which should lead to a high level of clinical suspicion and low threshold for diagnostic imaging for DVT or PE.,Future research should focus on optimal diagnostic and prophylactic strategies to prevent VTE and potentially improve survival.

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thromboembolic (VTE) diseases.,However, there is a limited amount of data regarding the prevention and management of VTE in severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients.,In this article, we review currently available clinical data, and mechanisms for COVID-associated coagulopathy, and propose algorithms for screening, prevention (including extended-duration prophylaxis), and treatment of these patients.,Although these recommendations are subject to change given rapidly evolving data, we provide a framework that can guide clinicians in managing thrombotic complications in this challenging condition.

What are the cardiovascular effects in unselected patients with recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?,In this cohort study including 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 identified from a COVID-19 test center, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), which was independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and the time from the original diagnosis.,These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.,This cohort study evaluates the presence of myocardial injury in unselected patients recently recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide.,Case reports of hospitalized patients suggest that COVID-19 prominently affects the cardiovascular system, but the overall impact remains unknown.,To evaluate the presence of myocardial injury in unselected patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness.,In this prospective observational cohort study, 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness were identified from the University Hospital Frankfurt COVID-19 Registry between April and June 2020.,Recent recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, as determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction on swab test of the upper respiratory tract.,Demographic characteristics, cardiac blood markers, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were obtained.,Comparisons were made with age-matched and sex-matched control groups of healthy volunteers (n = 50) and risk factor-matched patients (n = 57).,Of the 100 included patients, 53 (53%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 49 (14) years.,The median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR was 71 (64-92) days.,Of the 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19, 67 (67%) recovered at home, while 33 (33%) required hospitalization.,At the time of CMR, high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) was detectable (greater than 3 pg/mL) in 71 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (71%) and significantly elevated (greater than 13.9 pg/mL) in 5 patients (5%).,Compared with healthy controls and risk factor-matched controls, patients recently recovered from COVID-19 had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher left ventricle volumes, and raised native T1 and T2.,A total of 78 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (78%) had abnormal CMR findings, including raised myocardial native T1 (n = 73), raised myocardial native T2 (n = 60), myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (n = 32), or pericardial enhancement (n = 22).,There was a small but significant difference between patients who recovered at home vs in the hospital for native T1 mapping (median [IQR], 1119 [1092-1150] ms vs 1141 [1121-1175] ms; P = .008) and hsTnT (4.2 [3.0-5.9] pg/dL vs 6.3 [3.4-7.9] pg/dL; P = .002) but not for native T2 mapping.,None of these measures were correlated with time from COVID-19 diagnosis (native T1: r = 0.07; P = .47; native T2: r = 0.14; P = .15; hsTnT: r = −0.07; P = .50).,High-sensitivity troponin T was significantly correlated with native T1 mapping (r = 0.33; P < .001) and native T2 mapping (r = 0.18; P = .01).,Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with severe findings revealed active lymphocytic inflammation.,Native T1 and T2 were the measures with the best discriminatory ability to detect COVID-19-related myocardial pathology.,In this study of a cohort of German patients recently recovered from COVID-19 infection, CMR revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and time from the original diagnosis.,These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.

We describe the first case of acute cardiac injury directly linked to myocardial localization of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) in a 69‐year‐old patient with flu‐like symptoms rapidly degenerating into respiratory distress, hypotension, and cardiogenic shock.,The patient was successfully treated with venous‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and mechanical ventilation.,Cardiac function fully recovered in 5 days and ECMO was removed.,Endomyocardial biopsy demonstrated low‐grade myocardial inflammation and viral particles in the myocardium suggesting either a viraemic phase or, alternatively, infected macrophage migration from the lung.

Cardio-metabolic disease, namely ischemic heart disease, stroke, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, represent substantial health and economic burdens.,Almost one half of cardio-metabolic deaths in the U.S. might be prevented through proper nutrition.,Plant-based (vegetarian and vegan) diets are an effective strategy for improving nutrient intake.,At the same time, they are associated with decreased all-cause mortality and decreased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and coronary heart disease.,Evidence suggests that plant-based diets may reduce the risk of coronary heart disease events by an estimated 40% and the risk of cerebral vascular disease events by 29%.,These diets also reduce the risk of developing metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes by about one half.,Properly planned vegetarian diets are healthful, effective for weight and glycemic control, and provide metabolic and cardiovascular benefits, including reversing atherosclerosis and decreasing blood lipids and blood pressure.,The use of plant-based diets as a means of prevention and treatment of cardio-metabolic disease should be promoted through dietary guidelines and recommendations.

There is little randomised evidence using a whole food plant-based (WFPB) diet as intervention for elevated body mass index (BMI) or dyslipidaemia.,We investigated the effectiveness of a community-based dietary programme.,Primary end points: BMI and cholesterol at 6 months (subsequently extended).,Ages 35-70, from one general practice in Gisborne, New Zealand.,Diagnosed with obesity or overweight and at least one of type 2 diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia.,Of 65 subjects randomised (control n=32, intervention n=33), 49 (75.4%) completed the study to 6 months.,Twenty-three (70%) intervention participants were followed up at 12 months.,All participants received normal care.,Intervention participants attended facilitated meetings twice-weekly for 12 weeks, and followed a non-energy-restricted WFPB diet with vitamin B12 supplementation.,At 6 months, mean BMI reduction was greater with the WFPB diet compared with normal care (4.4 vs 0.4, difference: 3.9 kg m−2 (95% confidence interval (CI)±1), P<0.0001).,Mean cholesterol reduction was greater with the WFPB diet, but the difference was not significant compared with normal care (0.71 vs 0.26, difference: 0.45 mmol l−1 (95% CI±0.54), P=0.1), unless dropouts were excluded (difference: 0.56 mmol l−1 (95% CI±0.54), P=0.05).,Twelve-month mean reductions for the WFPB diet group were 4.2 (±0.8) kg m−2 BMI points and 0.55 (±0.54, P=0.05) mmol l−1 total cholesterol.,No serious harms were reported.,This programme led to significant improvements in BMI, cholesterol and other risk factors.,To the best of our knowledge, this research has achieved greater weight loss at 6 and 12 months than any other trial that does not limit energy intake or mandate regular exercise.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic in just a few months, causing millions infected.,Nearly 20% of COVID-19 patients present severe coagulation abnormalities, which may occur in almost all of the severe and critical ill COVID-19 cases.,Concomitant venous thromboembolism (VTE), a potential cause of unexplained deaths, has been frequently reported in COVID-19 cases, but its management is still challenging due to the complexity between antithrombotic therapy and coagulation disorders.,Based on frontline practical experience and comprehensive literature review, here a panel of experts and physicians from China and Europe developed an evidence and opinion-based consensus on the prophylaxis and management of VTE associated with COVID-19.,This statement aims for clinicians treating COVID-19 and provides practical recommendations in detailed situations, for example, how to choose thromboprophylactic measures for patients with diverse severity of disease and bleeding risk, or which kind of anticoagulant should be prescribed.,With limited experience on COVID19-associated VTE, this expert consensus statement should be helpful for clinicians worldwide with specific suggestions.

Image 1,Some of the mechanisms and conditions underlying endothelial dysfunction.A- Human skin capillaries, visualized with high-resolution intravital color microscopy in the finger of a patient with obesity, metabolic syndrome, and coronary artery disease.B- In a healthy control: the reduced number of capillaries can be noticed in A compared to B.,- Human skin capillaries, visualized with high-resolution intravital color microscopy in the finger of a patient with obesity, metabolic syndrome, and coronary artery disease.,- In a healthy control: the reduced number of capillaries can be noticed in A compared to B.

The approval of the first two monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 (daratumumab) and SLAMF7 (elotuzumab) in late 2015 for treating relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was a critical advance for immunotherapies for multiple myeloma (MM).,Importantly, the outcome of patients continues to improve with the incorporation of this new class of agents with current MM therapies.,However, both antigens are also expressed on other normal tissues including hematopoietic lineages and immune effector cells, which may limit their long-term clinical use.,B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein in the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily 17 (TNFRSF17), is expressed at significantly higher levels in all patient MM cells but not on other normal tissues except normal plasma cells.,Importantly, it is an antigen targeted by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, which have already shown significant clinical activities in patients with RRMM who have undergone at least three prior treatments, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent.,Moreover, the first anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate also has achieved significant clinical responses in patients who failed at least three prior lines of therapy, including an anti-CD38 antibody, a proteasome inhibitor, and an immunomodulatory agent.,Both BCMA targeting immunotherapies were granted breakthrough status for patients with RRMM by FDA in Nov 2017.,Other promising BCMA-based immunotherapeutic macromolecules including bispecific T-cell engagers, bispecific molecules, bispecific or trispecific antibodies, as well as improved forms of next generation CAR T cells, also demonstrate high anti-MM activity in preclinical and even early clinical studies.,Here, we focus on the biology of this promising MM target antigen and then highlight preclinical and clinical data of current BCMA-targeted immunotherapies with various mechanisms of action.,These crucial studies will enhance selective anti-MM response, transform the treatment paradigm, and extend disease-free survival in MM.

Recent clinical advances with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have led to the accelerated clinical approval of CD19-CARs to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia.,The CAR T cell therapy is nevertheless associated with toxicities, especially if the CARs are not entirely tumor-specific.,Therefore, strategies for controlling the CAR T cell activity are required to improve their safety profile.,Here, by using the multiple myeloma (MM)-associated CD38 molecule as target molecule, we tested the feasibility and utility of a doxycycline (DOX) inducible Tet-on CD38-CAR design to control the off-target toxicities of CAR T cells.,Using CARs with high affinity to CD38, we demonstrate that this strategy allows the proper induction of CD38-CARs and CAR-mediated T cell cytotoxicity in a DOX-dose dependent manner.,Especially when the DOX dose was limited to 10ng/ml, its removal resulted in a relatively rapid decay of CAR- related off-tumor effects within 24 hours, indicating the active controllability of undesired CAR activity.,This Tet-on CAR design also allowed us to induce the maximal anti-MM cytotoxic activity of affinity-optimized CD38-CAR T cells, which already display a low toxicity profile, hereby adding a second level of safety to these cells.,Collectively, these results indicate the possibility to utilize this DOX inducible CAR-design to actively regulate the CAR-mediated activities of therapeutic T cells.,We therefore conclude that the Tet-on system may be more advantageous above suicide-genes to control the potential toxicities of CAR T cells without the need to destroy them permanently.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications.,To investigate the incidence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Single‐center cohort study of 198 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Seventy‐five patients (38%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).,At time of data collection, 16 (8%) were still hospitalized and 19% had died.,During a median follow‐up of 7 days (IQR, 3‐13), 39 patients (20%) were diagnosed with VTE of whom 25 (13%) had symptomatic VTE, despite routine thrombosis prophylaxis.,The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days were 16% (95% CI, 10‐22), 33% (95% CI, 23‐43) and 42% (95% CI 30‐54) respectively.,For symptomatic VTE, these were 10% (95% CI, 5.8‐16), 21% (95% CI, 14‐30) and 25% (95% CI 16‐36).,VTE appeared to be associated with death (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.02‐5.5).,The cumulative incidence of VTE was higher in the ICU (26% (95% CI, 17‐37), 47% (95% CI, 34‐58), and 59% (95% CI, 42‐72) at 7, 14 and 21 days) than on the wards (any VTE and symptomatic VTE 5.8% (95% CI, 1.4‐15), 9.2% (95% CI, 2.6‐21), and 9.2% (2.6‐21) at 7, 14, and 21 days).,The observed risk for VTE in COVID‐19 is high, particularly in ICU patients, which should lead to a high level of clinical suspicion and low threshold for diagnostic imaging for DVT or PE.,Future research should focus on optimal diagnostic and prophylactic strategies to prevent VTE and potentially improve survival.

•Venous thrombosis is common in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.,•Many of these thromboses may be immunothromboses due to local inflammation, rather than thromboembolic disease.,•Anticoagulated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have a risk of major bleeding.,Venous thrombosis is common in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.,Many of these thromboses may be immunothromboses due to local inflammation, rather than thromboembolic disease.,Anticoagulated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have a risk of major bleeding.

Introduction: To explore the involvement of the cardiovascular system in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we investigated whether myocardial injury occurred in COVID-19 patients and assessed the performance of serum high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels in predicting disease severity and 30-day in-hospital fatality.,Methods: We included 244 COVID-19 patients, who were admitted to Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University with no preexisting cardiovascular disease or renal dysfunction.,We analyzed the data including patients' clinical characteristics, cardiac biomarkers, severity of medical conditions, and 30-day in-hospital fatality.,We performed multivariable Cox regressions and the receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the association of cardiac biomarkers on admission with disease severity and prognosis.,Results: In this retrospective observational study, 11% of COVID-19 patients had increased hs-cTnI levels (>40 ng/L) on admission.,Of note, serum hs-cTnI levels were positively associated with the severity of medical conditions (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 6.00 [6.00-6.00] ng/L in 91 patients with moderate conditions, 6.00 [6.00-18.00] ng/L in 107 patients with severe conditions, and 11.00 [6.00-56.75] ng/L in 46 patients with critical conditions, P for trend=0.001).,Moreover, compared with those with normal cTnI levels, patients with increased hs-cTnI levels had higher in-hospital fatality (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 4.79 [1.46-15.69]).,The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that the inclusion of hs-cTnI levels into a panel of empirical prognostic factors substantially improved the prediction performance for severe or critical conditions (area under the curve (AUC): 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.78) vs.,0.65 (0.58-0.72), P=0.01), as well as for 30-day fatality (AUC: 0.91 (0.85-0.96) vs.,0.77 (0.62-0.91), P=0.04).,A cutoff value of 20 ng/L of hs-cTnI level led to the best prediction to 30-day fatality.,Conclusions: In COVID-19 patients with no preexisting cardiovascular disease, 11% had increased hs-cTnI levels.,Besides empirical prognostic factors, serum hs-cTnI levels upon admission provided independent prediction to both the severity of the medical condition and 30-day in-hospital fatality.,These findings may shed important light on the clinical management of COVID-19.

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

Receptor-interacting protein 3 (Ripk3)-mediated necroptosis contributes to cardiac ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury through poorly defined mechanisms.,Our results demonstrated that Ripk3 was strongly upregulated in murine hearts subjected to IR injury and cardiomyocytes treated with LPS and H2O2.,The higher level of Ripk3 was positively correlated to the infarction area expansion, cardiac dysfunction and augmented cardiomyocytes necroptosis.,Function study further illustrated that upregulated Ripk3 evoked the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which was accompanied with an increase in intracellular Ca2+ level ([Ca2+]c) and xanthine oxidase (XO) expression.,Activated XO raised cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) that mediated the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening and cardiomyocytes necroptosis.,By comparison, genetic ablation of Ripk3 abrogated the ER stress and thus blocked the [Ca2+]c overload-XO-ROS-mPTP pathways, favouring a pro-survival state that ultimately resulted in the inhibition of cardiomyocytes necroptosis in the setting of cardiac IR injury.,In summary, the present study helps to elucidate how necroptosis is mediated by ER stress, via the calcium overload /XO/ROS/mPTP opening axis.,Ripk3 was strongly upregulated in murine hearts subjected to IR injury and cardiomyocytes treated with LPS and H2O2.,The upregulated Ripk3 may evoke the ER stress, which was accompanied with intracellular calcium overload and XO expression.,Activated XO raised cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) that mediated the mPTP and cardiomyocytes necroptosis.fx1,•ER stress is activated by Ripk3 in cardiac IR injury.,•ER stress induces calcium overload which triggers XO-dependent ROS overproduction.,•ROS outburst promotes mPTP opening that accounts for the necroptosis.,•Inhibiting ER stress favors cardiomyocytes survival and protects cardiac function.,ER stress is activated by Ripk3 in cardiac IR injury.,ER stress induces calcium overload which triggers XO-dependent ROS overproduction.,ROS outburst promotes mPTP opening that accounts for the necroptosis.,Inhibiting ER stress favors cardiomyocytes survival and protects cardiac function.

Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) could ameliorate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MIRI) by various mechanisms, but there hadn’t been any reports on that CAPE could regulate silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) to exert cardioprotective effect.,The present study aimed to investigate the cardioprotective potential of caffeic acid o-nitro phenethyl ester (CAPE-oNO2) on MIRI and the possible mechanism based on the positive control of CAPE.,The SD rats were subjected to left coronary artery ischemia /reperfusion (IR) and the H9c2 cell cultured in hypoxia/reoxygenation (HR) to induce the MIRI model.,Prior to the procedure, vehicle, CAPE or CAPE-oNO2 were treated in the absence or presence of a SIRT1 inhibitor nicotinamide (NAM) and an eNOS inhibitor Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME).,In vivo, CAPE and CAPE-oNO2 conferred a cardioprotective effect as shown by reduced myocardial infarct size, cardiac marker enzymes and structural abnormalities.,From immunohistochemical and sirius red staining, above two compounds ameliorated the TNF-α release and collagen deposition of IR rat hearts.,They could agitate SIRT1 and eNOS expression, and consequently enhance NO release and suppress NF-κB signaling, to reduce the malondialdehyde content and cell necrosis.,In vitro, they could inhibit HR-induced H9c2 cell apoptosis and ROS generation by activating SIRT1/eNOS pathway and inhabiting NF-κB expression.,Emphatically, CAPE-oNO2 presented the stronger cardioprotection than CAPE both in vivo and in vitro.,However, NAM and L-NAME eliminated the CAPE-oNO2-mediated cardioprotection by restraining SIRT1 and eNOS expression, respectively.,It suggested that CAPE-oNO2 ameliorated MIRI by suppressing the oxidative stress, inflammatory response, fibrosis and necrocytosis via the SIRT1/eNOS/NF-κB pathway.,The Cardioprotection of CAPE-oNO2against MIRI via the SIRT1/ eNOS / NF-κB pathway.,CAPE-oNO2 ameliorated MIRI by suppressing the oxidative stress, inflammatory response, fibrosis and necrocytosis via the SIRT1/ eNOS / NF-κB pathway.,IR, ischemia/reperfusion; HR, hypoxia/reoxygenation; L-NAME, eNOS inhibitor Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; NAM, SIRT1 inhibitor nicotinamide; CAPE, caffeic acid phenethyl ester; oNO2, caffeic acid o-nitro phenethyl ester.fx1,•CAPE-oNO2 exerting cardioprotective potential was firstly synthesized.,•IR-induced ROS increase aggravates inflammation, fibrosis and necrocytosis.,•The SIRT1/eNOS/NF-κB pathway is contributed to MIRI both in vivo and in vitro.,CAPE-oNO2 exerting cardioprotective potential was firstly synthesized.,IR-induced ROS increase aggravates inflammation, fibrosis and necrocytosis.,The SIRT1/eNOS/NF-κB pathway is contributed to MIRI both in vivo and in vitro.

COVID‐19 is associated with a substantial risk of venous thrombotic events, even in the presence of adequate thromboprophylactic therapy.,We aimed to better characterize the hypercoagulable state of COVID‐19 patients in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy.,We took plasma samples of 23 patients with COVID‐19 who were on prophylactic or intensified anticoagulant therapy.,Twenty healthy volunteers were included to establish reference ranges.,COVID‐19 patients had a mildly prolonged prothrombin time, high von Willebrand factor levels and low ADAMTS13 activity.,Most rotational thromboelastometry parameters were normal, with a hypercoagulable maximum clot firmness in part of the patients.,Despite detectable anti‐activated factor X activity in the majority of patients, ex vivo thrombin generation was normal, and in vivo thrombin generation elevated as evidenced by elevated levels of thrombin‐antithrombin complexes and D‐dimers.,Plasma levels of activated factor VII were lower in patients, and levels of the platelet activation marker soluble CD40 ligand were similar in patients and controls.,Plasmin‐antiplasmin complex levels were also increased in patients despite an in vitro hypofibrinolytic profile.,COVID‐19 patients are characterized by normal in vitro thrombin generation and enhanced clot formation and decreased fibrinolytic potential despite the presence of heparin in the sample.,Anticoagulated COVID‐19 patients have persistent in vivo activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, but no evidence of excessive platelet activation.,Ongoing activation of coagulation despite normal to intensified anticoagulant therapy indicates studies on alternative antithrombotic strategies are urgently required.

Three months ago, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) broke out in Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly around the world.,Severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) patients have abnormal blood coagulation function, but their venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevalence is still rarely mentioned.,To determine the incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP.,In this study, 81 severe NCP patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) were enrolled.,The results of conventional coagulation parameters and lower limb vein ultrasonography of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.,The incidence of VTE in these patients was 25% (20/81), of which 8 patients with VTE events died.,The VTE group was different from the non‐VTE group in age, lymphocyte counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D‐dimer, etc.,If 1.5 µg/mL was used as the D‐dimer cut‐off value to predicting VTE, the sensitivity was 85.0%, the specificity was 88.5%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 94.7%.,The incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP is 25% (20/81), which may be related to poor prognosis.,The significant increase of D‐dimer in severe NCP patients is a good index for identifying high‐risk groups of VTE.

Although patients with cardiovascular disease face excess risks of severe illness with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), there may be indirect consequences of the pandemic on this high-risk patient segment.,This study sought to examine longitudinal trends in hospitalizations for acute cardiovascular conditions across a tertiary care health system.,Acute cardiovascular hospitalizations were tracked between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020.,Daily hospitalization rates were estimated using negative binomial models.,Temporal trends in hospitalization rates were compared across the first 3 months of 2020, with the first 3 months of 2019 as a reference.,From January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020, 6,083 patients experienced 7,187 hospitalizations for primary acute cardiovascular reasons.,There were 43.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.4% to 56.0%) fewer estimated daily hospitalizations in March 2020 compared with March 2019 (p < 0.001).,The daily rate of hospitalizations did not change throughout 2019 (-0.01% per day [95% CI: -0.04% to +0.02%]; p = 0.50), January 2020 (-0.5% per day [95% CI: -1.6% to +0.5%]; p = 0.31), or February 2020 (+0.7% per day [95% CI: -0.6% to +2.0%]; p = 0.27).,There was significant daily decline in hospitalizations in March 2020 (-5.9% per day [95% CI: -7.6% to -4.3%]; p < 0.001).,Length of stay was shorter (4.8 days [25th to 75th percentiles: 2.4 to 8.3 days] vs.,6.0 days [25th to 75th percentiles: 3.1 to 9.6 days]; p = 0.003) and in-hospital mortality was not significantly different (6.2% vs.,4.4%; p = 0.30) in March 2020 compared with March 2019.,During the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a marked decline in acute cardiovascular hospitalizations, and patients who were admitted had shorter lengths of stay.,These data substantiate concerns that acute care of cardiovascular conditions may be delayed, deferred, or abbreviated during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A new type of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks recently in China and spreads into many other countries.,This disease, named as COVID-19, is similar to patients infected by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and nearly 20% of patients developed severe condition.,Cardiac injury is a prevalent complication of severe patients, exacerbating the disease severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.,Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the key host cellular receptor of SARS-CoV-2, has been identified in multiple organs, but its cellular distribution in human heart is not illuminated clearly.,This study performed the first state-of-art single cell atlas of adult human heart, and revealed that pericytes with high expression of ACE2 might act as the target cardiac cell of SARS-CoV-2.,The pericytes injury due to virus infection may result in capillary endothelial cells dysfunction, inducing microvascular dysfunction.,And patients with basic heart failure disease showed increased ACE2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, meaning that if infected by the virus these patients may have higher risk of heart attack and critically ill condition.,The finding of this study explains the high rate of severe cases among COVID-19 patients with basic cardiovascular disease; and these results also perhaps provide important reference to clinical treatment of cardiac injury among severe patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

In addition to the directly attributed mortality, COVID-19 is also likely to increase mortality indirectly.,In this systematic review, we investigate the direct and indirect effects of COVID-19 on out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.,We searched PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring during the pandemic and a non-pandemic period.,Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool.,The primary endpoint was return of spontaneous circulation.,Secondary endpoints were bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, survival to hospital discharge, and survival with favourable neurological outcome.,We identified six studies.,In two studies, rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge decreased significantly during the pandemic.,Especially in Europe, bystander-witnessed cases, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation attempted by emergency medical services were reduced during the pandemic.,Also, ambulance response times were significantly delayed across all studies and patients presenting with non-shockable rhythms increased in two studies.,In 2020, 3.9-5.9% of tested patients were SARS-CoV-2 positive and 4.8-26% had suggestive symptoms (fever and cough or dyspnoea).,Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests had worse short-term outcomes during the pandemic than a non-pandemic period suggesting direct effects of COVID-19 infection and indirect effects from lockdown and disruption of healthcare systems.,Patients at high risk of deterioration should be identified outside the hospital to promptly initiate treatment and reduce fatalities.,Study registration PROSPERO CRD42020195794.

An increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence has been reported in the very early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic, but a clear demonstration of a correlation between the increased incidence of OHCA and COVID-19 is missing so far.,We aimed to verify whether there is an association between the OHCA difference compared with 2019 and the COVID-19 epidemic curve.,We included all the consecutive OHCAs which occurred in the Provinces of Lodi, Cremona, Pavia, and Mantova in the 2 months following the first documented case of COVID-19 in the Lombardia Region and compared them with those which occurred in the same time frame in 2019.,The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 from 21 February to 20 April 2020 in the study territory was 956 COVID-19/100 000 inhabitants and the cumulative incidence of OHCA was 21 cases/100 000 inhabitants, with a 52% increase as compared with 2019 (490 OHCAs in 2020 vs. 321 in 2019).,A strong and statistically significant correlation was found between the difference in cumulative incidence of OHCA between 2020 and 2019 per 100 000 inhabitants and the COVID-19 cumulative incidence per 100 000 inhabitants both for the overall territory (ρ 0.87, P < 0.001) and for each province separately (Lodi: ρ 0.98, P < 0.001; Cremona: ρ 0.98, P < 0.001; Pavia: ρ 0.87, P < 0.001; Mantova: ρ 0.81, P < 0.001).,The increase in OHCAs in 2020 is significantly correlated to the COVID-19 pandemic and is coupled with a reduction in short-term outcome.,Government and local health authorities should seriously consider our results when planning healthcare strategies to face the epidemic, especially considering the expected recurrent outbreaks.,Graphical Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether right ventricular longitudinal strain (RVLS) was independently predictive of higher mortality in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).,RVLS obtained from 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography has been recently demonstrated to be a more accurate and sensitive tool to estimate right ventricular (RV) function.,The prognostic value of RVLS in patients with COVID-19 remains unknown.,One hundred twenty consecutive patients with COVID-19 who underwent echocardiographic examinations were enrolled in our study.,Conventional RV functional parameters, including RV fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and tricuspid tissue Doppler annular velocity, were obtained.,RVLS was determined using 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography.,RV function was categorized in tertiles of RVLS.,Compared with patients in the highest RVLS tertile, those in the lowest tertile were more likely to have higher heart rate; elevated levels of D-dimer and C-reactive protein; more high-flow oxygen and invasive mechanical ventilation therapy; higher incidence of acute heart injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and deep vein thrombosis; and higher mortality.,After a median follow-up period of 51 days, 18 patients died.,Compared with survivors, nonsurvivors displayed enlarged right heart chambers, diminished RV function, and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.,Male sex, acute respiratory distress syndrome, RVLS, RV fractional area change, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion were significant univariate predictors of higher risk for mortality (p < 0.05 for all).,A Cox model using RVLS (hazard ratio: 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15 to 1.53; p < 0.001; Akaike information criterion = 129; C-index = 0.89) was found to predict higher mortality more accurately than a model with RV fractional area change (Akaike information criterion = 142, C-index = 0.84) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (Akaike information criterion = 144, C-index = 0.83).,The best cutoff value of RVLS for prediction of outcome was −23% (AUC: 0.87; p < 0.001; sensitivity, 94.4%; specificity, 64.7%).,RVLS is a powerful predictor of higher mortality in patients with COVID-19.,These results support the application of RVLS to identify higher risk patients with COVID-19.

COVID-19 may predispose to both venous and arterial thromboembolism due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation and diffuse intravascular coagulation.,Reports on the incidence of thrombotic complications are however not available.,We evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or systemic arterial embolism in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital.,We studied 184 ICU patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia of whom 23 died (13%), 22 were discharged alive (12%) and 139 (76%) were still on the ICU on April 5th 2020.,All patients received at least standard doses thromboprophylaxis.,The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 31% (95%CI 20-41), of which CTPA and/or ultrasonography confirmed VTE in 27% (95%CI 17-37%) and arterial thrombotic events in 3.7% (95%CI 0-8.2%).,PE was the most frequent thrombotic complication (n = 25, 81%).,Age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.05/per year, 95%CI 1.004-1.01) and coagulopathy, defined as spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time > 3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time > 5 s (aHR 4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.1), were independent predictors of thrombotic complications.,The 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU patients with COVID-19 infections is remarkably high.,Our findings reinforce the recommendation to strictly apply pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, and are strongly suggestive of increasing the prophylaxis towards high-prophylactic doses, even in the absence of randomized evidence.

Several countries affected by the COVID-19 pandemic have reported a substantial drop in the number of patients attending the emergency department with acute coronary syndromes and a reduced number of cardiac procedures.,We aimed to understand the scale, nature, and duration of changes to admissions for different types of acute coronary syndrome in England and to evaluate whether in-hospital management of patients has been affected as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.,We analysed data on hospital admissions in England for types of acute coronary syndrome from Jan 1, 2019, to May 24, 2020, that were recorded in the Secondary Uses Service Admitted Patient Care database.,Admissions were classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), myocardial infarction of unknown type, or other acute coronary syndromes (including unstable angina).,We identified revascularisation procedures undertaken during these admissions (ie, coronary angiography without percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], PCI, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery).,We calculated the numbers of weekly admissions and procedures undertaken; percentage reductions in weekly admissions and across subgroups were also calculated, with 95% CIs.,Hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome declined from mid-February, 2020, falling from a 2019 baseline rate of 3017 admissions per week to 1813 per week by the end of March, 2020, a reduction of 40% (95% CI 37-43).,This decline was partly reversed during April and May, 2020, such that by the last week of May, 2020, there were 2522 admissions, representing a 16% (95% CI 13-20) reduction from baseline.,During the period of declining admissions, there were reductions in the numbers of admissions for all types of acute coronary syndrome, including both STEMI and NSTEMI, but relative and absolute reductions were larger for NSTEMI, with 1267 admissions per week in 2019 and 733 per week by the end of March, 2020, a percent reduction of 42% (95% CI 38-46).,In parallel, reductions were recorded in the number of PCI procedures for patients with both STEMI (438 PCI procedures per week in 2019 vs 346 by the end of March, 2020; percent reduction 21%, 95% CI 12-29) and NSTEMI (383 PCI procedures per week in 2019 vs 240 by the end of March, 2020; percent reduction 37%, 29-45).,The median length of stay among patients with acute coronary syndrome fell from 4 days (IQR 2-9) in 2019 to 3 days (1-5) by the end of March, 2020.,Compared with the weekly average in 2019, there was a substantial reduction in the weekly numbers of patients with acute coronary syndrome who were admitted to hospital in England by the end of March, 2020, which had been partly reversed by the end of May, 2020.,The reduced number of admissions during this period is likely to have resulted in increases in out-of-hospital deaths and long-term complications of myocardial infarction and missed opportunities to offer secondary prevention treatment for patients with coronary heart disease.,The full extent of the effect of COVID-19 on the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome will continue to be assessed by updating these analyses.,UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Public Health England, Health Data Research UK, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,We aimed to investigate the acute stroke presentations during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.,The data were obtained from a health system with 19 emergency departments in northeast Ohio in the United States.,Baseline period from January 1 to March 8, 2020, was compared with the COVID period from March 9, to April 2, 2020.,The variables included were total daily stroke alerts across the hospital emergency departments, thrombolysis, time to presentation, stroke severity, time from door-to-imaging, time from door-to-needle in thrombolysis, and time from door-to-puncture in thrombectomy.,The 2 time periods were compared using nonparametric statistics and Poisson regression.,Nine hundred two stroke alerts during the period across the emergency departments were analyzed.,Total daily stroke alerts decreased from median, 10 (interquartile range, 8-13) during baseline period to median, 8 (interquartile range, 4-10, P=0.001) during COVID period.,Time to presentation, stroke severity, and time to treatment were unchanged.,COVID period was associated with decrease in stroke alerts with rate ratio of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60-0.28).,Thrombolysis also decreased with rate ratio, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.28-0.97) but thrombectomy remained unchanged rate ratio, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.52-1.62),We observed a significant decrease in acute stroke presentations by ≈30% across emergency departments at the time of surge of COVID-19 cases.,This observation could be attributed to true decline in stroke incidence or patients not seeking medical attention for emergencies during the pandemic.

There is no known effective therapy for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,Initial reports suggesting the potential benefit of hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin (HY/AZ) have resulted in massive adoption of this combination worldwide.,However, while the true efficacy of this regimen is unknown, initial reports have raised concerns about the potential risk of QT interval prolongation and induction of torsade de pointes (TdP).,The purpose of this study was to assess the change in corrected QT (QTc) interval and arrhythmic events in patients with COVID-19 treated with HY/AZ.,This is a retrospective study of 251 patients from 2 centers who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and treated with HY/AZ.,We reviewed electrocardiographic tracings from baseline and until 3 days after the completion of therapy to determine the progression of QTc interval and the incidence of arrhythmia and mortality.,The QTc interval prolonged in parallel with increasing drug exposure and incompletely shortened after its completion.,Extreme new QTc interval prolongation to >500 ms, a known marker of high risk of TdP, had developed in 23% of patients.,One patient developed polymorphic ventricular tachycardia suspected as TdP, requiring emergent cardioversion.,Seven patients required premature termination of therapy.,The baseline QTc interval of patients exhibiting extreme QTc interval prolongation was normal.,The combination of HY/AZ significantly prolongs the QTc interval in patients with COVID-19.,This prolongation may be responsible for life-threatening arrhythmia in the form of TdP.,This risk mandates careful consideration of HY/AZ therapy in light of its unproven efficacy.,Strict QTc interval monitoring should be performed if the regimen is given.

Few data are available on the rate and characteristics of thromboembolic complications in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.,We studied consecutive symptomatic patients with laboratory-proven COVID-19 admitted to a university hospital in Milan, Italy (13.02.2020-10.04.2020).,The primary outcome was any thromboembolic complication, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/myocardial infarction (MI).,Secondary outcome was overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).,We included 388 patients (median age 66 years, 68% men, 16% requiring intensive care [ICU]).,Thromboprophylaxis was used in 100% of ICU patients and 75% of those on the general ward.,Thromboembolic events occurred in 28 (7.7% of closed cases; 95%CI 5.4%-11.0%), corresponding to a cumulative rate of 21% (27.6% ICU, 6.6% general ward).,Half of the thromboembolic events were diagnosed within 24 h of hospital admission.,Forty-four patients underwent VTE imaging tests and VTE was confirmed in 16 (36%).,Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was performed in 30 patients, corresponding to 7.7% of total, and pulmonary embolism was confirmed in 10 (33% of CTPA).,The rate of ischemic stroke and ACS/MI was 2.5% and 1.1%, respectively.,Overt DIC was present in 8 (2.2%) patients.,The high number of arterial and, in particular, venous thromboembolic events diagnosed within 24 h of admission and the high rate of positive VTE imaging tests among the few COVID-19 patients tested suggest that there is an urgent need to improve specific VTE diagnostic strategies and investigate the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory COVID-19 patients.,•COVID-19 is characterized by coagulation activation and endothelial dysfunction.,Few data are available on thromboembolic complications.,•We studied symptomatic patients with laboratory-proven COVID-19 admitted to a university hospital in Milan, Italy (13.02-10.04.2020).,•Venous and arterial thromboembolic events occurred in 8% of hospitalized patients (cumulative rate 21.0%) and 50% of events were diagnosed within 24 h of hospital admission.,•Forty-four (11% of total) patients underwent VTE imaging tests; 16 were positive (36% of tests), suggesting underestimation of thromboembolic complications.,•There is an urgent need to investigate VTE diagnostic strategies and the impact of thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory COVID-19 patients.,COVID-19 is characterized by coagulation activation and endothelial dysfunction.,Few data are available on thromboembolic complications.,We studied symptomatic patients with laboratory-proven COVID-19 admitted to a university hospital in Milan, Italy (13.02-10.04.2020).,Venous and arterial thromboembolic events occurred in 8% of hospitalized patients (cumulative rate 21.0%) and 50% of events were diagnosed within 24 h of hospital admission.,Forty-four (11% of total) patients underwent VTE imaging tests; 16 were positive (36% of tests), suggesting underestimation of thromboembolic complications.,There is an urgent need to investigate VTE diagnostic strategies and the impact of thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory COVID-19 patients.

Mouse models of heart disease are extensively employed.,The echocardiographic characterization of contractile function is usually focused on systolic function with fewer studies assessing diastolic function.,Furthermore, the applicability of diverse echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function that are commonly used in humans has not been extensively evaluated in different pathophysiological models in mice.,We used high resolution echocardiography to evaluate parameters of diastolic function in mouse models of chronic pressure overload (aortic constriction), volume overload (aorto-caval shunt), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; DOCA-salt hypertension), and acute sarcoplasmic reticulum dysfunction induced by thapsigargin - all known to exhibit diastolic dysfunction.,Left atrial area increased in all three chronic models while mitral E/A was difficult to quantify at high heart rates.,Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and Doppler E/E′ increased significantly and the peak longitudinal strain rate during early filling (peak reverse longitudinal strain rate) decreased significantly after aortic constriction, with the changes being proportional to the magnitude of hypertrophy.,In the HFpEF model, reverse longitudinal strain rate decreased significantly but changes in IVRT and E/E′ were non-significant, consistent with less severe dysfunction.,With volume overload, there was a significant increase in reverse longitudinal strain rate and decrease in IVRT, indicating a restrictive physiology.,Acute thapsigargin treatment caused significant prolongation of IVRT and decrease in reverse longitudinal strain rate.,These results indicate that the combined measurement of left atrial area plus reverse longitudinal strain rate and/or IVRT provide an excellent overall assessment of diastolic function in the diseased mouse heart, allowing distinction between different types of pathophysiology.,•Several echocardiographic indices of diastolic function are applicable to mouse models.,•Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and peak strain during filling are easily quantified.,•Left atrial area increases with pressure and volume overload as well as HFpEF.,•Changes in IVRT and strain during filling distinguish restrictive physiology.,•Combined left atrial area and diastolic strain provide an ideal diagnostic framework.,Several echocardiographic indices of diastolic function are applicable to mouse models.,Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and peak strain during filling are easily quantified.,Left atrial area increases with pressure and volume overload as well as HFpEF.,Changes in IVRT and strain during filling distinguish restrictive physiology.,Combined left atrial area and diastolic strain provide an ideal diagnostic framework.

Diastolic dysfunction is common in cardiac disease and an important finding independent of systolic function as it contributes to the signs and symptoms of heart failure.,Tissue Doppler mitral early diastolic velocity (Ea) combined with peak transmitral early diastolic velocity (E) to obtain E/Ea ratio provides an estimate of the left ventricular (LV) filling pressure.,However, E/Ea has a significant gray zone and less reliable in patients with preserved ejection fraction (>50%).,Two-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking measure myocardial strain and strain rate (Sr) avoiding the Doppler-associated angulation errors and tethering artifacts.,Global myocardial peak diastolic strain (Ds) and diastolic Sr (DSr) at the time of E and isovolumic relaxation combined with E (E/Ds and E/10 DSr) have been recently proposed as novel indices to determine LV filling pressure.,The present article elucidates the methodology of studying diastology with strain echocardiography along with the advantages and limitations of the novel technique in light of the available literature.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced infection can be associated with a coagulopathy, findings consistent with infection-induced inflammatory changes as observed in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC).,The lack of prior immunity to COVID-19 has resulted in large numbers of infected patients across the globe and uncertainty regarding management of the complications that arise in the course of this viral illness.,The lungs are the target organ for COVID-19; patients develop acute lung injury that can progress to respiratory failure, although multiorgan failure can also occur.,The initial coagulopathy of COVID-19 presents with prominent elevation of D-dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen-degradation products, whereas abnormalities in prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and platelet counts are relatively uncommon in initial presentations.,Coagulation test screening, including the measurement of D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, is suggested.,COVID-19-associated coagulopathy should be managed as it would be for any critically ill patient, following the established practice of using thromboembolic prophylaxis for critically ill hospitalized patients, and standard supportive care measures for those with sepsis-induced coagulopathy or DIC.,Although D-dimer, sepsis physiology, and consumptive coagulopathy are indicators of mortality, current data do not suggest the use of full-intensity anticoagulation doses unless otherwise clinically indicated.,Even though there is an associated coagulopathy with COVID-19, bleeding manifestations, even in those with DIC, have not been reported.,If bleeding does occur, standard guidelines for the management of DIC and bleeding should be followed.

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications.,To investigate the incidence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Single‐center cohort study of 198 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Seventy‐five patients (38%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).,At time of data collection, 16 (8%) were still hospitalized and 19% had died.,During a median follow‐up of 7 days (IQR, 3‐13), 39 patients (20%) were diagnosed with VTE of whom 25 (13%) had symptomatic VTE, despite routine thrombosis prophylaxis.,The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days were 16% (95% CI, 10‐22), 33% (95% CI, 23‐43) and 42% (95% CI 30‐54) respectively.,For symptomatic VTE, these were 10% (95% CI, 5.8‐16), 21% (95% CI, 14‐30) and 25% (95% CI 16‐36).,VTE appeared to be associated with death (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.02‐5.5).,The cumulative incidence of VTE was higher in the ICU (26% (95% CI, 17‐37), 47% (95% CI, 34‐58), and 59% (95% CI, 42‐72) at 7, 14 and 21 days) than on the wards (any VTE and symptomatic VTE 5.8% (95% CI, 1.4‐15), 9.2% (95% CI, 2.6‐21), and 9.2% (2.6‐21) at 7, 14, and 21 days).,The observed risk for VTE in COVID‐19 is high, particularly in ICU patients, which should lead to a high level of clinical suspicion and low threshold for diagnostic imaging for DVT or PE.,Future research should focus on optimal diagnostic and prophylactic strategies to prevent VTE and potentially improve survival.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is a pandemic disease currently affecting millions of people worldwide.,Its neurological implications are poorly understood, and further study is urgently required.,A hypercoagulable state has been reported in patients with severe COVID‐19, but nothing is known about coagulopathy in patients with milder disease.,We describe cases of patients in New York City presenting with stroke secondary to large vessel thrombosis without occlusion, incidentally found to have COVID‐19 with only mild respiratory symptoms.,This is in contrast to the venous thrombosis and microangiopathy that has been reported in patients with severe COVID‐19.,Our cases suggest that even in the absence of severe disease, patients with COVID‐19 may be at increased risk of thrombus formation leading to stroke, perhaps resulting from viral involvement of the endothelium.,Further systematic study is needed because this may have implications for primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with COVID‐19.

•Unlike venous thromboembolism, no data are available on arterial thrombosis in SARS-CoV2 infected patients.,•We observed severe arterial thrombotic complications despite the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.,•We described five irreversible lower limb ischemia and two thoracic aortic free floating thrombi.,•Further studies are needed to evaluate the necessity of therapeutic anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients.,Unlike venous thromboembolism, no data are available on arterial thrombosis in SARS-CoV2 infected patients.,We observed severe arterial thrombotic complications despite the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.,We described five irreversible lower limb ischemia and two thoracic aortic free floating thrombi.,Further studies are needed to evaluate the necessity of therapeutic anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), a viral respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), may predispose patients to thrombotic disease, both in the venous and arterial circulations, because of excessive inflammation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis.,In addition, many patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic disease may develop COVID-19, which can have implications for choice, dosing, and laboratory monitoring of antithrombotic therapy.,Moreover, during a time with much focus on COVID-19, it is critical to consider how to optimize the available technology to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease.,Herein, the authors review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, epidemiology, management, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who develop venous or arterial thrombosis, of those with pre-existing thrombotic disease who develop COVID-19, or those who need prevention or care for their thrombotic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.,•COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,•Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,•Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,•The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.,COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.

The outbreak of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan have affected more than 250 countries and regions worldwide.,However, most of the clinical studies have been focused on Wuhan, and little is known about the disease outside of Wuhan in China.,In this retrospective cohort study, we report the early clinical features of 80 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital in Beijing.,The results show that 27 (33.8%) patients had severe illness.,Six (7.5%) patients were admitted to the ICU, and 3 (3.8%) patients died.,Forty-eight percent (39/80) of the patients had a history of living/traveling in Wuhan.,Patients with severe- illness were significantly older (average age, 71 years old vs 44 years old) and had a high incidence of expectoration (59.3% vs 34.0%), shortness of breath (92.6% vs 9.4%), anorexia (51.9% vs 18.9%) and confusion(18.5% vs 0%) compared with nonsevere patients.,The systolic blood pressure (median, 130 mmHg vs 120 mmHg) was higher and the oxygen saturation (median, 98.3% vs 92.0%) was significantly lower in severe patients than nonsevere patients.,In addition, myoglobin (median, 56.0 ng/mL vs 35.0 ng/mL), troponin I (median, 0.02 pg/mL vs 0.01 pg/mL), C-reactive protein (median, 69.7 mg/L vs 12.9 mg/L) and neutrophils (median, 3.3×109/L vs 2.2×109/L) were significantly increased, while lymphocytes (median, 0.8×109/L vs 1.2×109/L), albumin (mean, 32.8 g/L vs 36.8 g/L) and the creatinine clearance rate (median, 91.2 vs 108.2 ml/min/1.73m2) were significantly decreased among severe patients.,Our study revealed that older patients with high levels of C-reactive protein, myoglobin, troponin I, and neutrophil and high systolic blood pressure as well as low levels of lymphocytes, and albumin and a low creatinine clearance rate and oxygen saturation were more likely to have severe disease.

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of Corona Virus Disease 2019 in Taizhou, China.,A single center retrospective observational study was performed between Jan 1, 2020 and Mar 11, 2020 at Taizhou Public Health Medical Center, Zhejiang, China.,All patients with confirmed Corona Virus Disease 2019 were enrolled, and their clinical data were gathered by reviewing electronic medical records.,Outcomes of severely ill patients and non-severely ill patients were compared.,Of 145 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the average age was 47.5 years old (standard deviation, 14.6) and 54.5% were men.,Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (15.2%), followed by diabetes mellitus (9.7%).,Common symptoms included dry cough (81.4%), fever (75.2%), anorexia (42.8%), fatigue (40.7%), chest tightness (32.4%), diarrhea (26.9%) and dizziness (20%).,According to imaging examination, 79.3% patients showed bilateral pneumonia, 18.6% showed unilateral pneumonia, 61.4% showed ground-glass opacity, and 2.1% showed no abnormal result.,Compared with non-severely ill patients, severely ill patients were older (mean, years, 52.8 vs.,45.3, p < 0.01), had a higher proportion of diabetes mellitus (16.3% vs.,6.9%, p = 0.08), had a higher body mass index (mean, 24.78 vs.,23.20, p = 0.02) and were more likely to have fever (90.7% vs.,68.6%, p = 0.01), anorexia (60.5% vs.,35.3%, p = 0.01), chest tightness (60.5% vs.20.6%, p < 0.01) and dyspnea (7.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.03).,Of the 43 severely ill patients, 6 (14%) received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, and 1 (2.3%) received invasive mechanical ventilation.,Older patients or patients with comorbidities such as obesity or diabetes mellitus were more likely to have severe condition.,Treatments of COVID-19 is still experimental and more clinical trials are needed.

Bakuchiol (BAK), a monoterpene phenol reported to have exerted a variety of pharmacological effects, has been related to multiple diseases, including myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury, pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy, diabetes, liver fibrosis, and cancer.,However, the effects of BAK on hyperglycemia-caused diabetic cardiomyopathy and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.,In this study, streptozotocin-induced mouse model and high-glucose-treated cell model were conducted to investigate the protective roles of BAK on diabetic cardiomyopathy, in either the presence or absence of SIRT1-specific inhibitor EX527, SIRT1 siRNA, or Nrf2 siRNA.,Our data demonstrated for the first time that BAK could significantly abate diabetic cardiomyopathy by alleviating the cardiac dysfunction, ameliorating the myocardial fibrosis, mitigating the cardiac hypertrophy, and reducing the cardiomyocyte apoptosis.,Furthermore, BAK achieved its antifibrotic and antihypertrophic actions by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway, as well as decreasing the expressions of fibrosis- and hypertrophy-related markers.,Intriguingly, these above effects of BAK were largely attributed to the remarkable activation of SIRT1/Nrf2 signaling, which eventually strengthened cardiac antioxidative capacity by elevating the antioxidant production and reducing the reactive oxygen species generation.,However, all the beneficial results were markedly abolished with the administration of EX527, SIRT1 siRNA, or Nrf2 siRNA.,In summary, these novel findings indicate that BAK exhibits its therapeutic properties against hyperglycemia-caused diabetic cardiomyopathy by attenuating myocardial oxidative damage via activating the SIRT1/Nrf2 signaling.

Luteolin has been reported to attenuate ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury in the diabetic heart through endothelial nitric oxide synthase- (eNOS-) related antioxidative response.,Though the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is regarded as a key endogenous factor to reduce diabetic oxidative stress, whether luteolin reduces cardiac I/R injury in the diabetic heart via enhancing Nrf2 function needs to be clarified.,We hypothesized that pretreatment with luteolin could alleviate cardiac I/R injury in the diabetic heart by affecting the eNOS/Nrf2 signaling pathway.,The diabetic rat was produced by a single injection of streptozotocin (65 mg/kg, i.p.) for 6 weeks, and then, luteolin (100 mg/kg/day, i.g.), eNOS inhibitor L-NAME, or Nrf2 inhibitor brusatol was administered for the succedent 2 weeks.,After that, the isolated rat heart was exposed to 30 min of global ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion to establish I/R injury.,Luteolin markedly ameliorated cardiac function and myocardial viability; upregulated expressions of heme oxygenase-1, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase; and reduced myocardial lactate dehydrogenase release, malondialdehyde, and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in the diabetic I/R heart.,All these ameliorating effects of luteolin were significantly reversed by L-NAME or brusatol.,Luteolin also markedly reduced S-nitrosylation of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) and upregulated Nrf2 and its transcriptional activity.,This effect of luteolin on Keap1/Nrf2 signaling was attenuated by L-NAME.,These data reveal that luteolin protects the diabetic heart against I/R injury by enhancing eNOS-mediated S-nitrosylation of Keap1, with subsequent upregulation of Nrf2 and the Nrf2-related antioxidative signaling pathway.

Thrombosis and inflammation may contribute to morbidity and mortality among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).,We hypothesized that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation would improve outcomes in critically ill patients with Covid-19.,In an open-label, adaptive, multiplatform, randomized clinical trial, critically ill patients with severe Covid-19 were randomly assigned to a pragmatically defined regimen of either therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin or pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in accordance with local usual care.,The primary outcome was organ support-free days, evaluated on an ordinal scale that combined in-hospital death (assigned a value of −1) and the number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support up to day 21 among patients who survived to hospital discharge.,The trial was stopped when the prespecified criterion for futility was met for therapeutic-dose anticoagulation.,Data on the primary outcome were available for 1098 patients (534 assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and 564 assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis).,The median value for organ support-free days was 1 (interquartile range, −1 to 16) among the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and was 4 (interquartile range, −1 to 16) among the patients assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis (adjusted proportional odds ratio, 0.83; 95% credible interval, 0.67 to 1.03; posterior probability of futility [defined as an odds ratio <1.2], 99.9%).,The percentage of patients who survived to hospital discharge was similar in the two groups (62.7% and 64.5%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.64 to 1.11).,Major bleeding occurred in 3.8% of the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and in 2.3% of those assigned to usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.,In critically ill patients with Covid-19, an initial strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin did not result in a greater probability of survival to hospital discharge or a greater number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support than did usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.,(REMAP-CAP, ACTIV-4a, and ATTACC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02735707, NCT04505774, NCT04359277, and NCT04372589.)

COVID-19 pneumonia has been associated with high rates of thrombo-embolic complications, mostly venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is thought to be a combination of conventional VTE and in situ immunothrombosis in the pulmonary vascular tree.,The incidence of thrombotic complications is dependent on setting (intensive care unit (ICU) versus general ward) and the threshold for performing diagnostic tests (screening versus diagnostic algorithms triggered by symptoms).,Since these thrombotic complications are associated with in-hospital mortality, all current guidelines and consensus papers propose pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in all hospitalized patients with COVID-19.,Several trials are ongoing to study the optimal intensity of anticoagulation for this purpose.,As for the management of thrombotic complications, treatment regimens from non-COVID-19 guidelines can be adapted, with choice of anticoagulant drug class dependent on the situation.,Parenteral anticoagulation is preferred for patients on ICUs or with impending clinical deterioration, while oral treatment can be started in stable patients.,This review describes current knowledge on incidence and pathophysiology of COVID-19 associated VTE and provides an overview of guideline recommendations on thromboprophylaxis and treatment of established VTE in COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a hypercoagulable state.,Several autopsy studies have found microthrombi in pulmonary circulation.,In this randomized, open-label, phase II study, we randomized COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation to receive either therapeutic enoxaparin or the standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.,We evaluated the gas exchange over time through the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at baseline, 7, and 14 days after randomization, the time until successful liberation from mechanical ventilation, and the ventilator-free days.,Ten patients were assigned to the therapeutic enoxaparin and ten patients to prophylactic anticoagulation.,There was a statistically significant increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio over time in the therapeutic group (163 [95% confidence interval - CI 133-193] at baseline, 209 [95% CI 171-247] after 7 days, and 261 [95% CI 230-293] after 14 days), p = 0.0004.,In contrast, we did not observe this improvement over time in the prophylactic group (184 [95% CI 146-222] at baseline, 168 [95% CI 142-195] after 7 days, and 195 [95% CI 128-262] after 14 days), p = 0.487.,Patients of the therapeutic group had a higher ratio of successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio: 4.0 [95% CI 1.035-15.053]), p = 0.031 and more ventilator-free days (15 days [interquartile range IQR 6-16] versus 0 days [IQR 0-11]), p = 0.028 when compared to the prophylactic group.,Therapeutic enoxaparin improves gas exchange and decreases the need for mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19.,REBEC RBR-949z6v.,•COVID-19 is associated with microthrombi in pulmonary circulation.,•We randomized severe COVID-19 patients to receive either therapeutic enoxaparin or the standard thromboprophylaxis.,•Therapeutic enoxaparin resulted in improved gas exchange over time.,•Larger clinical trial is urgently needed to evaluate the anticoagulant therapy in severe COVID-19.,COVID-19 is associated with microthrombi in pulmonary circulation.,We randomized severe COVID-19 patients to receive either therapeutic enoxaparin or the standard thromboprophylaxis.,Therapeutic enoxaparin resulted in improved gas exchange over time.,Larger clinical trial is urgently needed to evaluate the anticoagulant therapy in severe COVID-19.

•Venous thrombosis is common in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.,•Many of these thromboses may be immunothromboses due to local inflammation, rather than thromboembolic disease.,•Anticoagulated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have a risk of major bleeding.,Venous thrombosis is common in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.,Many of these thromboses may be immunothromboses due to local inflammation, rather than thromboembolic disease.,Anticoagulated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have a risk of major bleeding.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been associated with cardiovascular features of myocardial involvement including elevated serum troponin levels and acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.,The cardiac pathological changes in these patients with COVID-19 have yet to be well described.,In an international multicentre study, cardiac tissue from the autopsies of 21 consecutive COVID-19 patients was assessed by cardiovascular pathologists.,The presence of myocarditis, as defined by the presence of multiple foci of inflammation with associated myocyte injury, was determined, and the inflammatory cell composition analysed by immunohistochemistry.,Other forms of acute myocyte injury and inflammation were also described, as well as coronary artery, endocardium, and pericardium involvement.,Lymphocytic myocarditis was present in 3 (14%) of the cases.,In two of these cases, the T lymphocytes were CD4 predominant and in one case the T lymphocytes were CD8 predominant.,Increased interstitial macrophage infiltration was present in 18 (86%) of the cases.,A mild pericarditis was present in four cases.,Acute myocyte injury in the right ventricle, most probably due to strain/overload, was present in four cases.,There was a non-significant trend toward higher serum troponin levels in the patients with myocarditis compared with those without myocarditis.,Disrupted coronary artery plaques, coronary artery aneurysms, and large pulmonary emboli were not identified.,In SARS-CoV-2 there are increased interstitial macrophages in a majority of the cases and multifocal lymphocytic myocarditis in a small fraction of the cases.,Other forms of myocardial injury are also present in these patients.,The macrophage infiltration may reflect underlying diseases rather than COVID-19.

This case series study evaluates the association of underlying cardiovascular disease and myocardial injury on fatal outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,What is the impact of underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) and myocardial injury on fatal outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?,In this case series study of 187 patients with COVID-19, 27.8% of patients had myocardial injury, which resulted in cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias.,Myocardial injury has a significant association with fatal outcome of COVID-19, while the prognosis of patients with underlying CVD but without myocardial injury were relatively favorable.,It is reasonable to triage patients with COVID-19 according to the presence of underlying CVD and evidence of myocardial injury for prioritized treatment and even more aggressive strategies.,Increasing numbers of confirmed cases and mortality rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are occurring in several countries and continents.,Information regarding the impact of cardiovascular complication on fatal outcome is scarce.,To evaluate the association of underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) and myocardial injury with fatal outcomes in patients with COVID-19.,This retrospective single-center case series analyzed patients with COVID-19 at the Seventh Hospital of Wuhan City, China, from January 23, 2020, to February 23, 2020.,Analysis began February 25, 2020.,Demographic data, laboratory findings, comorbidities, and treatments were collected and analyzed in patients with and without elevation of troponin T (TnT) levels.,Among 187 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 144 patients (77%) were discharged and 43 patients (23%) died.,The mean (SD) age was 58.50 (14.66) years.,Overall, 66 (35.3%) had underlying CVD including hypertension, coronary heart disease, and cardiomyopathy, and 52 (27.8%) exhibited myocardial injury as indicated by elevated TnT levels.,The mortality during hospitalization was 7.62% (8 of 105) for patients without underlying CVD and normal TnT levels, 13.33% (4 of 30) for those with underlying CVD and normal TnT levels, 37.50% (6 of 16) for those without underlying CVD but elevated TnT levels, and 69.44% (25 of 36) for those with underlying CVD and elevated TnTs.,Patients with underlying CVD were more likely to exhibit elevation of TnT levels compared with the patients without CVD (36 [54.5%] vs 16 [13.2%]).,Plasma TnT levels demonstrated a high and significantly positive linear correlation with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (β = 0.530, P < .001) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (β = 0.613, P < .001).,Plasma TnT and NT-proBNP levels during hospitalization (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 0.307 [0.094-0.600]; 1902.00 [728.35-8100.00]) and impending death (median [IQR], 0.141 [0.058-0.860]; 5375 [1179.50-25695.25]) increased significantly compared with admission values (median [IQR], 0.0355 [0.015-0.102]; 796.90 [401.93-1742.25]) in patients who died (P = .001; P < .001), while no significant dynamic changes of TnT (median [IQR], 0.010 [0.007-0.019]; 0.013 [0.007-0.022]; 0.011 [0.007-0.016]) and NT-proBNP (median [IQR], 352.20 [174.70-636.70]; 433.80 [155.80-1272.60]; 145.40 [63.4-526.50]) was observed in survivors (P = .96; P = .16).,During hospitalization, patients with elevated TnT levels had more frequent malignant arrhythmias, and the use of glucocorticoid therapy (37 [71.2%] vs 69 [51.1%]) and mechanical ventilation (31 [59.6%] vs 14 [10.4%]) were higher compared with patients with normal TnT levels.,The mortality rates of patients with and without use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers was 36.8% (7 of 19) and 21.4% (36 of 168) (P = .13).,Myocardial injury is significantly associated with fatal outcome of COVID-19, while the prognosis of patients with underlying CVD but without myocardial injury is relatively favorable.,Myocardial injury is associated with cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias.,Inflammation may be a potential mechanism for myocardial injury.,Aggressive treatment may be considered for patients at high risk of myocardial injury.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications.,To investigate the incidence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Single‐center cohort study of 198 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Seventy‐five patients (38%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).,At time of data collection, 16 (8%) were still hospitalized and 19% had died.,During a median follow‐up of 7 days (IQR, 3‐13), 39 patients (20%) were diagnosed with VTE of whom 25 (13%) had symptomatic VTE, despite routine thrombosis prophylaxis.,The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days were 16% (95% CI, 10‐22), 33% (95% CI, 23‐43) and 42% (95% CI 30‐54) respectively.,For symptomatic VTE, these were 10% (95% CI, 5.8‐16), 21% (95% CI, 14‐30) and 25% (95% CI 16‐36).,VTE appeared to be associated with death (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.02‐5.5).,The cumulative incidence of VTE was higher in the ICU (26% (95% CI, 17‐37), 47% (95% CI, 34‐58), and 59% (95% CI, 42‐72) at 7, 14 and 21 days) than on the wards (any VTE and symptomatic VTE 5.8% (95% CI, 1.4‐15), 9.2% (95% CI, 2.6‐21), and 9.2% (2.6‐21) at 7, 14, and 21 days).,The observed risk for VTE in COVID‐19 is high, particularly in ICU patients, which should lead to a high level of clinical suspicion and low threshold for diagnostic imaging for DVT or PE.,Future research should focus on optimal diagnostic and prophylactic strategies to prevent VTE and potentially improve survival.

Coagulopathy is a common abnormality in patients with COVID‐19.,However, the exact incidence of venous thromboembolic event is unknown in anticoagulated, severe COVID‐19 patients.,Systematic assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) using complete duplex ultrasound (CDU) in anticoagulated COVID‐19 patients.,We performed a retrospective study in 2 French intensive care units (ICU) where CDU is performed as a standard of care.,A CDU from thigh to ankle at selected sites with Doppler waveforms and images was performed early during ICU stay in patients admitted with COVID‐19.,Anticoagulation dose was left to the discretion of the treating physician based on the individual risk of thrombosis.,Patients were classified as treated with prophylactic anticoagulation or therapeutic anticoagulation.,Pulmonary embolism was systematically searched in patients with persistent hypoxemia or secondary deterioration.,From March 19 to April 11, 2020, 26 consecutive patients with severe COVID‐19 were screened for VTE.,Eight patients (31%) were treated with prophylactic anticoagulation, whereas 18 patients (69%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation.,The overall rate of VTE in patients was 69%.,The proportion of VTE was significantly higher in patients treated with prophylactic anticoagulation when compared with the other group (100% vs 56%, respectively, P = .03).,Surprisingly, we found a high rate of thromboembolic events in COVID‐19 patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation, with 56% of VTE and 6 pulmonary embolisms.,Our results suggest considering both systematic screening of VTE and early therapeutic anticoagulation in severe ICU COVID‐19 patients.

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 that has significant implications for the cardiovascular care of patients.,First, those with COVID-19 and pre-existing cardiovascular disease have an increased risk of severe disease and death.,Second, infection has been associated with multiple direct and indirect cardiovascular complications including acute myocardial injury, myocarditis, arrhythmias, and venous thromboembolism.,Third, therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have cardiovascular side effects.,Fourth, the response to COVID-19 can compromise the rapid triage of non-COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular conditions.,Finally, the provision of cardiovascular care may place health care workers in a position of vulnerability as they become hosts or vectors of virus transmission.,We hereby review the peer-reviewed and pre-print reports pertaining to cardiovascular considerations related to COVID-19 and highlight gaps in knowledge that require further study pertinent to patients, health care workers, and health systems.,•Patients with pre-existing CVD appear to have worse outcomes with COVID-19.,•CV complications include biomarker elevations, myocarditis, heart failure, and venous thromboembolism, which may be exacerbated by delays in care.,•Therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have significant drug-drug interactions with CV medications.,•Health care workers and health systems should take measures to ensure safety while providing high-quality care for COVID-19 patients.,Patients with pre-existing CVD appear to have worse outcomes with COVID-19.,CV complications include biomarker elevations, myocarditis, heart failure, and venous thromboembolism, which may be exacerbated by delays in care.,Therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have significant drug-drug interactions with CV medications.,Health care workers and health systems should take measures to ensure safety while providing high-quality care for COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 affects millions of patients worldwide, with clinical presentation ranging from isolated thrombosis to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring ventilator support.,Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) originate from decondensed chromatin released to immobilize pathogens, and they can trigger immunothrombosis.,We studied the connection between NETs and COVID-19 severity and progression.,We conducted a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients (n = 33) and age- and sex-matched controls (n = 17).,We measured plasma myeloperoxidase (MPO)-DNA complexes (NETs), platelet factor 4, RANTES, and selected cytokines.,Three COVID-19 lung autopsies were examined for NETs and platelet involvement.,We assessed NET formation ex vivo in COVID-19 neutrophils and in healthy neutrophils incubated with COVID-19 plasma.,We also tested the ability of neonatal NET-inhibitory factor (nNIF) to block NET formation induced by COVID-19 plasma.,Plasma MPO-DNA complexes increased in COVID-19, with intubation (P < .0001) and death (P < .0005) as outcome.,Illness severity correlated directly with plasma MPO-DNA complexes (P = .0360), whereas Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen correlated inversely (P = .0340).,Soluble and cellular factors triggering NETs were significantly increased in COVID-19, and pulmonary autopsies confirmed NET-containing microthrombi with neutrophil-platelet infiltration.,Finally, COVID-19 neutrophils ex vivo displayed excessive NETs at baseline, and COVID-19 plasma triggered NET formation, which was blocked by nNIF.,Thus, NETs triggering immunothrombosis may, in part, explain the prothrombotic clinical presentations in COVID-19, and NETs may represent targets for therapeutic intervention.,•NETs contribute to microthrombi through platelet-neutrophil interactions in COVID-19 ARDS.•nNIF blocks NETs induced by COVID-19 plasma and represents a potential therapeutic intervention in COVID-19.,NETs contribute to microthrombi through platelet-neutrophil interactions in COVID-19 ARDS.,nNIF blocks NETs induced by COVID-19 plasma and represents a potential therapeutic intervention in COVID-19.

To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient admissions to Italian cardiac care units (CCUs).,We conducted a multicentre, observational, nationwide survey to collect data on admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at Italian CCUs throughout a 1 week period during the COVID-19 outbreak, compared with the equivalent week in 2019.,We observed a 48.4% reduction in admissions for AMI compared with the equivalent week in 2019 (P < 0.001).,The reduction was significant for both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI; 26.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 21.7-32.3; P = 0.009] and non-STEMI (NSTEMI; 65.1%, 95% CI 60.3-70.3; P < 0.001).,Among STEMIs, the reduction was higher for women (41.2%; P = 0.011) than men (17.8%; P = 0.191).,A similar reduction in AMI admissions was registered in North Italy (52.1%), Central Italy (59.3%), and South Italy (52.1%).,The STEMI case fatality rate during the pandemic was substantially increased compared with 2019 [risk ratio (RR) = 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.6; P < 0.001].,A parallel increase in complications was also registered (RR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8; P = 0.009).,Admissions for AMI were significantly reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic across Italy, with a parallel increase in fatality and complication rates.,This constitutes a serious social issue, demanding attention by the scientific and healthcare communities and public regulatory agencies.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related critical illness and acute illness are associated with a risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).,These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in decisions about the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19-related critical illness and acute illness who do not have confirmed or suspected VTE.,ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel and applied strict management strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest.,The panel included 3 patient representatives.,The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (up to 19 August 2020).,The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients.,The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.,The panel agreed on 2 recommendations.,The panel issued conditional recommendations in favor of prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation over intermediate-intensity or therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19-related critical illness or acute illness who do not have confirmed or suspected VTE.,These recommendations were based on very low certainty in the evidence, underscoring the need for high-quality, randomized controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation.,They will be updated using a living recommendation approach as new evidence becomes available.

The new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused more than 210 000 deaths worldwide.,However, little is known about the causes of death and the virus's pathologic features.,To validate and compare clinical findings with data from medical autopsy, virtual autopsy, and virologic tests.,Prospective cohort study.,Autopsies performed at a single academic medical center, as mandated by the German federal state of Hamburg for patients dying with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.,The first 12 consecutive COVID-19-positive deaths.,Complete autopsy, including postmortem computed tomography and histopathologic and virologic analysis, was performed.,Clinical data and medical course were evaluated.,Results: Median patient age was 73 years (range, 52 to 87 years), 75% of patients were male, and death occurred in the hospital (n = 10) or outpatient sector (n = 2).,Coronary heart disease and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the most common comorbid conditions (50% and 25%, respectively).,Autopsy revealed deep venous thrombosis in 7 of 12 patients (58%) in whom venous thromboembolism was not suspected before death; pulmonary embolism was the direct cause of death in 4 patients.,Postmortem computed tomography revealed reticular infiltration of the lungs with severe bilateral, dense consolidation, whereas histomorphologically diffuse alveolar damage was seen in 8 patients.,In all patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the lung at high concentrations; viremia in 6 of 10 and 5 of 12 patients demonstrated high viral RNA titers in the liver, kidney, or heart.,Limited sample size.,The high incidence of thromboembolic events suggests an important role of COVID-19-induced coagulopathy.,Further studies are needed to investigate the molecular mechanism and overall clinical incidence of COVID-19-related death, as well as possible therapeutic interventions to reduce it.,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.,Little is known of the pathologic changes that lead to death in patients with COVID-19.,This study reports the autopsy findings of consecutive patients who died with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced infection can be associated with a coagulopathy, findings consistent with infection-induced inflammatory changes as observed in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC).,The lack of prior immunity to COVID-19 has resulted in large numbers of infected patients across the globe and uncertainty regarding management of the complications that arise in the course of this viral illness.,The lungs are the target organ for COVID-19; patients develop acute lung injury that can progress to respiratory failure, although multiorgan failure can also occur.,The initial coagulopathy of COVID-19 presents with prominent elevation of D-dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen-degradation products, whereas abnormalities in prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and platelet counts are relatively uncommon in initial presentations.,Coagulation test screening, including the measurement of D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, is suggested.,COVID-19-associated coagulopathy should be managed as it would be for any critically ill patient, following the established practice of using thromboembolic prophylaxis for critically ill hospitalized patients, and standard supportive care measures for those with sepsis-induced coagulopathy or DIC.,Although D-dimer, sepsis physiology, and consumptive coagulopathy are indicators of mortality, current data do not suggest the use of full-intensity anticoagulation doses unless otherwise clinically indicated.,Even though there is an associated coagulopathy with COVID-19, bleeding manifestations, even in those with DIC, have not been reported.,If bleeding does occur, standard guidelines for the management of DIC and bleeding should be followed.

The new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused more than 210 000 deaths worldwide.,However, little is known about the causes of death and the virus's pathologic features.,To validate and compare clinical findings with data from medical autopsy, virtual autopsy, and virologic tests.,Prospective cohort study.,Autopsies performed at a single academic medical center, as mandated by the German federal state of Hamburg for patients dying with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.,The first 12 consecutive COVID-19-positive deaths.,Complete autopsy, including postmortem computed tomography and histopathologic and virologic analysis, was performed.,Clinical data and medical course were evaluated.,Results: Median patient age was 73 years (range, 52 to 87 years), 75% of patients were male, and death occurred in the hospital (n = 10) or outpatient sector (n = 2).,Coronary heart disease and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the most common comorbid conditions (50% and 25%, respectively).,Autopsy revealed deep venous thrombosis in 7 of 12 patients (58%) in whom venous thromboembolism was not suspected before death; pulmonary embolism was the direct cause of death in 4 patients.,Postmortem computed tomography revealed reticular infiltration of the lungs with severe bilateral, dense consolidation, whereas histomorphologically diffuse alveolar damage was seen in 8 patients.,In all patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the lung at high concentrations; viremia in 6 of 10 and 5 of 12 patients demonstrated high viral RNA titers in the liver, kidney, or heart.,Limited sample size.,The high incidence of thromboembolic events suggests an important role of COVID-19-induced coagulopathy.,Further studies are needed to investigate the molecular mechanism and overall clinical incidence of COVID-19-related death, as well as possible therapeutic interventions to reduce it.,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.,Little is known of the pathologic changes that lead to death in patients with COVID-19.,This study reports the autopsy findings of consecutive patients who died with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Despite many reports on the characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China, relatively little is known about the transmission features of COVID-19 outside Wuhan, especially at the provincial level.,We collected epidemiological, demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological and occupation information, along with contact history, of 671 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 reported from January 23 to February 5, 2020, in Henan province, China.,We described characteristics of these cases, compared the diagnostic accuracy and features of blood testing, computed tomography (CT) scans and X-rays, and analysed SARS-CoV-2 transmission sources and patients’ occupations in Henan province.,The mean age of patients in this case series was 43 years, 56.2% were male and 22.4% had coexisting medical disorders.,The death rate was 0.3%.,Fourteen patients did not show any symptoms.,Lymphocyte percentage was associated with disease severity (χ2 = 6.71, P = 0.035) but had a large variation in each sample group.,The mean time from illness onset to diagnosis was 5.6 days.,A total of 330 patients had ever lived in or visited Wuhan, 150 had contact with confirmed cases, 323 had been to a hospital and 119 had been to a wet market.,There were 33 patients who did not have a traceable transmission source, with 21.2% of these being farmers and 15.2% being workmen.,Lymphocyte percentage was a sign of severe COVID-19 in general but was not a good diagnostic index.,Longer time from illness onset to diagnosis was associated with higher COVID-19 severity, older age, higher likelihood of having coexisting cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, and being male.,Farming was found to be a high-risk occupation in Henan province, China.

Studies have reminded that cardiovascular metabolic comorbidities made patients more susceptible to suffer 2019 novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) disease (COVID-19), and exacerbated the infection.,The aim of this analysis is to determine the association of cardiovascular metabolic diseases with the development of COVID-19.,A meta-analysis of eligible studies that summarized the prevalence of cardiovascular metabolic diseases in COVID-19 and compared the incidences of the comorbidities in ICU/severe and non-ICU/severe patients was performed.,Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant studies.,A total of six studies with 1527 patients were included in this analysis.,The proportions of hypertension, cardia-cerebrovascular disease and diabetes in patients with COVID-19 were 17.1%, 16.4% and 9.7%, respectively.,The incidences of hypertension, cardia-cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes were about twofolds, threefolds and twofolds, respectively, higher in ICU/severe cases than in their non-ICU/severe counterparts.,At least 8.0% patients with COVID-19 suffered the acute cardiac injury.,The incidence of acute cardiac injury was about 13 folds higher in ICU/severe patients compared with the non-ICU/severe patients.,Patients with previous cardiovascular metabolic diseases may face a greater risk of developing into the severe condition and the comorbidities can also greatly affect the prognosis of the COVID-19.,On the other hand, COVID-19 can, in turn, aggravate the damage to the heart.

Reports have suggested an association between the development of myocarditis and the receipt of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), but the frequency and severity of myocarditis after vaccination have not been extensively explored.,We searched the database of Clalit Health Services, the largest health care organization (HCO) in Israel, for diagnoses of myocarditis in patients who had received at least one dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech).,The diagnosis of myocarditis was adjudicated by cardiologists using the case definition used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.,We abstracted the presentation, clinical course, and outcome from the patient’s electronic health record.,We performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis of the incidence of myocarditis up to 42 days after the first vaccine dose.,Among more than 2.5 million vaccinated HCO members who were 16 years of age or older, 54 cases met the criteria for myocarditis.,The estimated incidence per 100,000 persons who had received at least one dose of vaccine was 2.13 cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 2.70).,The highest incidence of myocarditis (10.69 cases per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 6.93 to 14.46) was reported in male patients between the ages of 16 and 29 years.,A total of 76% of cases of myocarditis were described as mild and 22% as intermediate; 1 case was associated with cardiogenic shock.,After a median follow-up of 83 days after the onset of myocarditis, 1 patient had been readmitted to the hospital, and 1 had died of an unknown cause after discharge.,Of 14 patients who had left ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography during admission, 10 still had such dysfunction at the time of hospital discharge.,Of these patients, 5 underwent subsequent testing that revealed normal heart function.,Among patients in a large Israeli health care system who had received at least one dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, the estimated incidence of myocarditis was 2.13 cases per 100,000 persons; the highest incidence was among male patients between the ages of 16 and 29 years.,Most cases of myocarditis were mild or moderate in severity.,(Funded by the Ivan and Francesca Berkowitz Family Living Laboratory Collaboration at Harvard Medical School and Clalit Research Institute.)

We sought to study the impact of COVID‐19 pandemic on the presentation delay, severity, patterns of care, and reasons for delay among patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a non‐hot‐spot region.,COVID‐19 pandemic has significantly reduced the activations for STEMI in epicenters like Spain.,From January 1, 2020, to April 15, 2020, 143 STEMIs were identified across our integrated 18‐hospital system.,Pre‐ and post‐COVID‐19 cohorts were based on March 23rd, 2020, whenstay‐at‐home orders were initiated in Ohio.,We used presenting heart rate, blood pressure, troponin, new Q‐wave, and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) to assess severity.,Duration of intensive care unit stay, total length of stay, door‐to‐balloon (D2B) time, and radial versus femoral access were used to assess patterns of care.,Post‐COVID‐19 presentation was associated with a lower admission LVEF (45 vs. 50%, p = .015), new Q‐wave, and higher initial troponin; however, these did not reach statistical significance.,Among post‐COVID‐19 patients, those with >12‐hr delay in presentation 31(%) had a longer average D2B time (88 vs. 53 min, p = .033) and higher peak troponin (58 vs.,8.5 ng/ml, p = .03).,Of these, 27% avoided the hospital due to fear of COVID‐19, 18% believed symptoms were COVID‐19 related, and 9% did not want to burden the hospital during the pandemic.,COVID‐19 has remarkably affected STEMI presentation and care.,Patients' fear and confusion about symptoms are integral parts of this emerging public health crisis.

Coagulopathy is a common abnormality in patients with COVID‐19.,However, the exact incidence of venous thromboembolic event is unknown in anticoagulated, severe COVID‐19 patients.,Systematic assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) using complete duplex ultrasound (CDU) in anticoagulated COVID‐19 patients.,We performed a retrospective study in 2 French intensive care units (ICU) where CDU is performed as a standard of care.,A CDU from thigh to ankle at selected sites with Doppler waveforms and images was performed early during ICU stay in patients admitted with COVID‐19.,Anticoagulation dose was left to the discretion of the treating physician based on the individual risk of thrombosis.,Patients were classified as treated with prophylactic anticoagulation or therapeutic anticoagulation.,Pulmonary embolism was systematically searched in patients with persistent hypoxemia or secondary deterioration.,From March 19 to April 11, 2020, 26 consecutive patients with severe COVID‐19 were screened for VTE.,Eight patients (31%) were treated with prophylactic anticoagulation, whereas 18 patients (69%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation.,The overall rate of VTE in patients was 69%.,The proportion of VTE was significantly higher in patients treated with prophylactic anticoagulation when compared with the other group (100% vs 56%, respectively, P = .03).,Surprisingly, we found a high rate of thromboembolic events in COVID‐19 patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation, with 56% of VTE and 6 pulmonary embolisms.,Our results suggest considering both systematic screening of VTE and early therapeutic anticoagulation in severe ICU COVID‐19 patients.

Three months ago, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) broke out in Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly around the world.,Severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) patients have abnormal blood coagulation function, but their venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevalence is still rarely mentioned.,To determine the incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP.,In this study, 81 severe NCP patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) were enrolled.,The results of conventional coagulation parameters and lower limb vein ultrasonography of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.,The incidence of VTE in these patients was 25% (20/81), of which 8 patients with VTE events died.,The VTE group was different from the non‐VTE group in age, lymphocyte counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D‐dimer, etc.,If 1.5 µg/mL was used as the D‐dimer cut‐off value to predicting VTE, the sensitivity was 85.0%, the specificity was 88.5%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 94.7%.,The incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP is 25% (20/81), which may be related to poor prognosis.,The significant increase of D‐dimer in severe NCP patients is a good index for identifying high‐risk groups of VTE.

The objectives were to investigate and compare the risks and incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between the 2 groups of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).,Medical records of 616 pneumonia patients who were admitted to the Yichang Central People’s Hospital in Hubei, China, from January 1 to March 23, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed.,The patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were treated in the dedicated COVID-19 units, and the patients with CAP were admitted to regular hospital campus.,Risks of VTE were assessed using the Padua prediction score.,All the patients received pharmaceutical or mechanical VTE prophylaxis.,VTE was diagnosed using Duplex ultrasound or computed tomography pulmonary angiogram.,Differences between COVID-19 and CAP groups were compared statistically.,All statistical tests were 2 sided, and P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.,All data managements and analyses were performed by IBM SPSS, version 24, software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL).,Of the 616 patients, 256 had COVID-19 pneumonia and 360 patients had CAP.,The overall rate of VTE was 2% in COVID-19 pneumonia group and 3.6% in CAP group, respectively (P=0.229).,In these two groups, 15.6% of the COVID-19 pneumonia patients and 10% of the CAP patients were categorized as high risk for VTE (Padua score, >4), which were significantly different (P=0.036).,In those high-risk patients, the incidence of VTE was 12.5% in COVID-19 pneumonia group and 16.7% in CAP group (P=0.606).,Subgroup analysis of the critically ill patients showed that VTE rate was 6.7% in COVID-19 group versus 13% in CAP group (P=0.484).,In-hospital mortality of COVID-19 and CAP was 6.3% and 3.9%, respectively (P=0.180).,Our study suggested that COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with hypercoagulable state.,However, the rate of VTE in COVID-19 pneumonia patients was not significantly higher than that in CAP patients.

An increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) has been reported.,Whether COVID-19 increases the risk of VTE in non-ICU wards remains unknown.,We aimed to evaluate the burden of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in COVID-19 patients with elevated D-dimer levels.,In this prospective study consecutive patients hospitalized in non-intensive care units with diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and D-dimer > 1000 ng/ml were screened for asymptomatic DVT with complete compression doppler ultrasound (CCUS).,The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.,The study comprised 156 patients (65.4% male).,All but three patients received standard doses of thromboprophylaxis.,Median days of hospitalization until CCUS was 9 (IQR 5-17).,CCUS was positive for DVT in 23 patients (14.7%), of whom only one was proximal DVT.,Seven patients (4.5%) had bilateral distal DVT.,Patients with DVT had higher median D-dimer levels: 4527 (IQR 1925-9144) ng/ml vs 2050 (IQR 1428-3235) ng/ml; p < 0.001.,D-dimer levels > 1570 ng/ml were associated with asymptomatic DVT (OR 9.1; CI 95% 1.1-70.1).,D-dimer showed an acceptable discriminative capacity (area under the ROC curve 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.84).,In patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.,•An increased risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit has been reported.,•The most consistent hemostatic abnormalities with COVID-19 include mild thrombocytopenia and increased D-dimer levels.,•In COVID-19 patients with high D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,•Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.,An increased risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit has been reported.,The most consistent hemostatic abnormalities with COVID-19 include mild thrombocytopenia and increased D-dimer levels.,In COVID-19 patients with high D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.

Nox2 is responsible for artery dysfunction via production of reactive oxidant species.,RNA viruses may activate Nox2, but it is unknown if this occurs in coronavirus 2019(Covid-19).,Nox2 activation by soluble Nox2-derived peptide(sNox2-dp) was measured in patients hospitalized for Covid-19 (n = 182) and controls (n = 91). sNox2-dp values were higher in Covid-19 patients versus controls and in severe versus non severe Covid-19.,Patients with thrombotic events(n = 35,19%) had higher sNox2-dp than thrombotic event-free ones.,A logistic regression analysis showed that sNox2 and coronary heart disease predicted thrombotic events.,Oxidative stress by Nox2 activation is associated severe disease and thrombotic events in Covid-19 patients.,•Nox2 is responsible for artery dysfunction via production of reactive oxidant species.•sNox2-dp values, markers of Nox2 activation, were high in Covid-19 patients and higher in those with severe disease.,•A logistic regression analysis showed that sNox2 predicted thrombotic events.,•Oxidative stress by Nox2 activation is associated severe disease and thrombotic events in Covid-19 patients.,Nox2 is responsible for artery dysfunction via production of reactive oxidant species.,sNox2-dp values, markers of Nox2 activation, were high in Covid-19 patients and higher in those with severe disease.,A logistic regression analysis showed that sNox2 predicted thrombotic events.,Oxidative stress by Nox2 activation is associated severe disease and thrombotic events in Covid-19 patients.

An important feature of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pathogenesis is COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, characterised by increased thrombotic and microvascular complications.,Previous studies have suggested a role for endothelial cell injury in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy.,To determine whether endotheliopathy is involved in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy pathogenesis, we assessed markers of endothelial cell and platelet activation in critically and non-critically ill patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19.,In this single-centre cross-sectional study, hospitalised adult (≥18 years) patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were identified in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) or a specialised non-ICU COVID-19 floor in our hospital.,Asymptomatic, non-hospitalised controls were recruited as a comparator group for biomarkers that did not have a reference range.,We assessed markers of endothelial cell and platelet activation, including von Willebrand Factor (VWF) antigen, soluble thrombomodulin, soluble P-selectin, and soluble CD40 ligand, as well as coagulation factors, endogenous anticoagulants, and fibrinolytic enzymes.,We compared the level of each marker in ICU patients, non-ICU patients, and controls, where applicable.,We assessed correlations between these laboratory results with clinical outcomes, including hospital discharge and mortality.,Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to further explore the association between biochemical markers and survival.,68 patients with COVID-19 were included in the study from April 13 to April 24, 2020, including 48 ICU and 20 non-ICU patients, as well as 13 non-hospitalised, asymptomatic controls.,Markers of endothelial cell and platelet activation were significantly elevated in ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients, including VWF antigen (mean 565% [SD 199] in ICU patients vs 278% [133] in non-ICU patients; p<0·0001) and soluble P-selectin (15·9 ng/mL [4·8] vs 11·2 ng/mL [3·1]; p=0·0014).,VWF antigen concentrations were also elevated above the normal range in 16 (80%) of 20 non-ICU patients.,We found mortality to be significantly correlated with VWF antigen (r = 0·38; p=0·0022) and soluble thrombomodulin (r = 0·38; p=0·0078) among all patients.,In all patients, soluble thrombomodulin concentrations greater than 3·26 ng/mL were associated with lower rates of hospital discharge (22 [88%] of 25 patients with low concentrations vs 13 [52%] of 25 patients with high concentrations; p=0·0050) and lower likelihood of survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (hazard ratio 5·9, 95% CI 1·9-18·4; p=0·0087).,Our findings show that endotheliopathy is present in COVID-19 and is likely to be associated with critical illness and death.,Early identification of endotheliopathy and strategies to mitigate its progression might improve outcomes in COVID-19.,This work was supported by a gift donation from Jack Levin to the Benign Hematology programme at Yale, and the National Institutes of Health.

Neural stem cells (NSCs) play vital roles in brain homeostasis and exhibit a broad repertoire of potentially therapeutic actions following neurovascular injury.,One such injury is stroke, a worldwide leading cause of death and disability.,Clinically, extensive injury from ischemic stroke results from ischemia-reperfusion (IR), which is accompanied by inflammation, blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage, neural cell death, and extensive tissue loss.,Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is still the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved clot-lysing agent.,Whereas the thrombolytic role of tPA within the vasculature is beneficial, the effects of tPA (in a non-thrombolytic role) within the brain parenchyma have been reported as harmful.,Thus, new therapies are needed to reduce the deleterious side effects of tPA and quickly facilitate vascular repair following stroke.,The Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) recommends that stroke therapies “focus on drugs/devices/treatments with multiple mechanisms of action and that target multiple pathways”.,Thus, based on multifactorial ischemic cascades in various stroke stages, effective stroke therapies need to focus on targeting and ameliorating early IR injury as well as facilitating angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and neurorestorative mechanisms following stroke.,This review will discuss the preclinical perspectives of NSC transplantation as a promising treatment for neurovascular injury and will emphasize both the subacute and chronic phase of ischemic stroke.

Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells (iNSCs) have significant potential as an autologous, multifunctional cell therapy for stroke, which is the primary cause of long term disability in the United States and the second leading cause of death worldwide.,Here we show that iNSC transplantation improves recovery through neuroprotective, regenerative, and cell replacement mechanisms in a novel ischemic pig stroke model.,Longitudinal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following iNSC therapy demonstrated reduced changes in white matter integrity, cerebral blood perfusion, and brain metabolism in the infarcted tissue.,The observed tissue level recovery strongly correlated with decreased immune response, enhanced neuronal protection, and increased neurogenesis. iNSCs differentiated into neurons and oligodendrocytes with indication of long term integration.,The robust recovery response to iNSC therapy in a translational pig stroke model with increased predictive potential strongly supports that iNSCs may be the critically needed therapeutic for human stroke patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), currently a worldwide pandemic, is a viral illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,The suspected contribution of thrombotic events to morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients has prompted a search for novel potential options for preventing COVID-19-associated thrombotic disease.,In this article by the Global COVID-19 Thrombosis Collaborative Group, we describe novel dosing approaches for commonly used antithrombotic agents (especially heparin-based regimens) and the potential use of less widely used antithrombotic drugs in the absence of confirmed thrombosis.,Although these therapies may have direct antithrombotic effects, other mechanisms of action, including anti-inflammatory or antiviral effects, have been postulated.,Based on survey results from this group of authors, we suggest research priorities for specific agents and subgroups of patients with COVID-19.,Further, we review other agents, including immunomodulators, that may have antithrombotic properties.,It is our hope that the present document will encourage and stimulate future prospective studies and randomized trials to study the safety, efficacy, and optimal use of these agents for prevention or management of thrombosis in COVID-19.

Acute respiratory failure and a systemic coagulopathy are critical aspects of the morbidity and mortality characterizing infection with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome-associated coronavirus-2, the etiologic agent of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,We examined skin and lung tissues from 5 patients with severe COVID-19 characterized by respiratory failure (n= 5) and purpuric skin rash (n = 3).,COVID-19 pneumonitis was predominantly a pauci-inflammatory septal capillary injury with significant septal capillary mural and luminal fibrin deposition and permeation of the interalveolar septa by neutrophils.,No viral cytopathic changes were observed and the diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) with hyaline membranes, inflammation, and type II pneumocyte hyperplasia, hallmarks of classic acute respiratory distress syndrome, were not prominent.,These pulmonary findings were accompanied by significant deposits of terminal complement components C5b-9 (membrane attack complex), C4d, and mannose binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine protease (MASP)2, in the microvasculature, consistent with sustained, systemic activation of the complement pathways.,The purpuric skin lesions similarly showed a pauci-inflammatory thrombogenic vasculopathy, with deposition of C5b-9 and C4d in both grossly involved and normally-appearing skin.,In addition, there was co-localization of COVID-19 spike glycoproteins with C4d and C5b-9 in the interalveolar septa and the cutaneous microvasculature of 2 cases examined.,In conclusion, at least a subset of sustained, severe COVID-19 may define a type of catastrophic microvascular injury syndrome mediated by activation of complement pathways and an associated procoagulant state.,It provides a foundation for further exploration of the pathophysiologic importance of complement in COVID-19, and could suggest targets for specific intervention.

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 that has significant implications for the cardiovascular care of patients.,First, those with COVID-19 and pre-existing cardiovascular disease have an increased risk of severe disease and death.,Second, infection has been associated with multiple direct and indirect cardiovascular complications including acute myocardial injury, myocarditis, arrhythmias, and venous thromboembolism.,Third, therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have cardiovascular side effects.,Fourth, the response to COVID-19 can compromise the rapid triage of non-COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular conditions.,Finally, the provision of cardiovascular care may place health care workers in a position of vulnerability as they become hosts or vectors of virus transmission.,We hereby review the peer-reviewed and pre-print reports pertaining to cardiovascular considerations related to COVID-19 and highlight gaps in knowledge that require further study pertinent to patients, health care workers, and health systems.,•Patients with pre-existing CVD appear to have worse outcomes with COVID-19.,•CV complications include biomarker elevations, myocarditis, heart failure, and venous thromboembolism, which may be exacerbated by delays in care.,•Therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have significant drug-drug interactions with CV medications.,•Health care workers and health systems should take measures to ensure safety while providing high-quality care for COVID-19 patients.,Patients with pre-existing CVD appear to have worse outcomes with COVID-19.,CV complications include biomarker elevations, myocarditis, heart failure, and venous thromboembolism, which may be exacerbated by delays in care.,Therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have significant drug-drug interactions with CV medications.,Health care workers and health systems should take measures to ensure safety while providing high-quality care for COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), currently a worldwide pandemic, is a viral illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,The suspected contribution of thrombotic events to morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients has prompted a search for novel potential options for preventing COVID-19-associated thrombotic disease.,In this article by the Global COVID-19 Thrombosis Collaborative Group, we describe novel dosing approaches for commonly used antithrombotic agents (especially heparin-based regimens) and the potential use of less widely used antithrombotic drugs in the absence of confirmed thrombosis.,Although these therapies may have direct antithrombotic effects, other mechanisms of action, including anti-inflammatory or antiviral effects, have been postulated.,Based on survey results from this group of authors, we suggest research priorities for specific agents and subgroups of patients with COVID-19.,Further, we review other agents, including immunomodulators, that may have antithrombotic properties.,It is our hope that the present document will encourage and stimulate future prospective studies and randomized trials to study the safety, efficacy, and optimal use of these agents for prevention or management of thrombosis in COVID-19.

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

•Coronoviruses not only affect the respiratory system, but also have deleterious effects on the central nervous system.,•Most neurological diseases could be caused by coronoviruses invasion.,•Coronoviruses cause nerve damage via diverse pathways.,Coronoviruses not only affect the respiratory system, but also have deleterious effects on the central nervous system.,Most neurological diseases could be caused by coronoviruses invasion.,Coronoviruses cause nerve damage via diverse pathways.,Viral infections have detrimental impacts on neurological functions, and even to cause severe neurological damage.,Very recently, coronaviruses (CoV), especially severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV 2 (SARS-CoV-2), exhibit neurotropic properties and may also cause neurological diseases.,It is reported that CoV can be found in the brain or cerebrospinal fluid.,The pathobiology of these neuroinvasive viruses is still incompletely known, and it is therefore important to explore the impact of CoV infections on the nervous system.,Here, we review the research into neurological complications in CoV infections and the possible mechanisms of damage to the nervous system.

The Middle East respiratory syndrome corona virus (MERS-CoV) is a novel positive sense singlestranded ribonucleic acid virus of the genus Beta corona virus.,This virus was first isolated from a patient who died from severe respiratory illness in June 2012 in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,We describe an unusual case of a 42 year old healthcare worker who was admitted to our Intensive Care Unit (ICU) King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, with MERS-CoV and severe acute respiratory distress Syndrome and developed a sudden-onset diabetes insipidus and spontaneous massive intracranial hemorrhage with intra-ventricular extension and tonsillar herniation.,Computed angiogram of the brain did not reveal any aneurysm or structural defects.,She never had uncontrolled hypertension, or coagulopathy, nor she received antiplatelets.,We are reporting a rare case of structural neurological damage associated with MERS-CoV infection.

Recent studies noted that Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) and IgA nephropathy (IgAN) share the feature of galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1)-oriented pathogenesis, although there are distinct clinical differences.,We aimed to clarify the clinicopathologic differences between these 2 diseases.,We cross-sectionally analyzed adult patients with HSPN (n = 24) or IgAN (n = 56) who underwent renal biopsy (RB) between 2008 and 2018 at Showa University Hospital.,Serum Gd-IgA1 (s-Gd-IgA1) levels at the time of RB were compared among study groups using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with anti-human Gd-IgA1-specific monoclonal antibody (KM55).,We also immunohistochemically stained paraffin-embedded sections for glomerular Gd-IgA1 (g-Gd-IgA1)-deposition using KM55.,Serum inflammatory cytokines were measured using ELISA.,Glomerular endothelial injury with subendothelial IgA deposition was significant in patients with HSPN.,Serum IL-8, MCP-1, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with HSPN than IgAN.,Levels of s-Gd-IgA1 were comparable among patients with HSPN and IgAN, and a similar degree of g-Gd-IgA1-deposition was detected in both diseases.,Furthermore, g-Gd-IgA1-deposition was evident in patients with histopathologically advanced HSPN or IgAN.,In HSPN, significant positive correlations between s-Gd-IgA1 levels and crescent formation or IL-6 elevation were confirmed, and g-Gd-IgA1 intensity showed a significant positive correlation with MCP-1 and a tendency to positively correlate with IL-8.,Meanwhile, patients with IgAN showed no correlation between inflammatory cytokines and both-Gd-IgA1.,Moreover, most g-Gd-IgA1-positive areas were not double stained with CD31 in HSPN.,Although assessing both-Gd-IgA1 alone was insufficient to distinguish between HSPN and IgAN, patients with HSPN showed considerable glomerular capillaritis with subendothelial IgA deposition and significant elevation of serum inflammatory cytokines.,Furthermore, such glomerular subendothelial IgA deposition might not contain Gd-IgA1, and factors associated with Gd-IgA1 were inconsistent among these 2 diseases.,Thus, developmental mechanisms for IgAN might not apply to HSPN completely, and these 2 diseases still have different aspects.

Henoch-Schönlein purpura is a systemic vasculitis characterized by IgA deposits, which target the skin, joints, and kidneys, among other organs.,In children, prognosis is often good but little is known about biomarkers of pediatric nephritis.,We hypothesized that biological markers, including cytokines, immunoglobulins, IgA-immune complexes, IgA glycosylation and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), may discriminate IgA vasculitis (IgAV) pediatric patients with renal involvement from those without renal involvement.,Fifty children at the time of IgAV rash between 2010 and 2015 were prospectively enrolled and compared to 21 controls.,All patients were assessed for clinical and biological parameters at the time of diagnosis, including the levels of cytokines, immunoglobulins, immune complexes, IgA glycosylation and NGAL in serum and urine.,Among IgAV patients, 33 patients exhibited nephritis (IgAV-N) and 17 children were without nephritis (IgAV-woN).,The serum level of galactose-deficient (Gd)-IgA1 (p<0.01) and the urinary concentrations of IgA, IgG, IgM, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IgA-IgG complexes and IgA-sCD89 complexes (p<0.001 for all) were higher in the IgAV-N patients than in the IgAV-woN patients.,Among those markers, urinary IgA and IgM had the highest AUC (0.86 and 0.87 respectively, p<0.0001).,This prospective cohort study furthers our understanding of the pathophysiology of IgAV.,We identified biomarkers that are able to distinguish patients initially with or without nephritis.,To conclude, serum Gd-IgA1 and urinary IgA, IgG, IgM, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IgA-IgG and IgA-sCD89 complexes could identify IgAV pediatric patients with renal involvement at the time of diagnosis.

•COVID-19 pneumonia could be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis.,•Antiphospholipid antibodies might be involved in thrombosis in COVID-19 patients.,•Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 and venous thrombosis was low.,COVID-19 pneumonia could be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis.,Antiphospholipid antibodies might be involved in thrombosis in COVID-19 patients.,Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 and venous thrombosis was low.

An increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) has been reported.,Whether COVID-19 increases the risk of VTE in non-ICU wards remains unknown.,We aimed to evaluate the burden of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in COVID-19 patients with elevated D-dimer levels.,In this prospective study consecutive patients hospitalized in non-intensive care units with diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and D-dimer > 1000 ng/ml were screened for asymptomatic DVT with complete compression doppler ultrasound (CCUS).,The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.,The study comprised 156 patients (65.4% male).,All but three patients received standard doses of thromboprophylaxis.,Median days of hospitalization until CCUS was 9 (IQR 5-17).,CCUS was positive for DVT in 23 patients (14.7%), of whom only one was proximal DVT.,Seven patients (4.5%) had bilateral distal DVT.,Patients with DVT had higher median D-dimer levels: 4527 (IQR 1925-9144) ng/ml vs 2050 (IQR 1428-3235) ng/ml; p < 0.001.,D-dimer levels > 1570 ng/ml were associated with asymptomatic DVT (OR 9.1; CI 95% 1.1-70.1).,D-dimer showed an acceptable discriminative capacity (area under the ROC curve 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.84).,In patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.,•An increased risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit has been reported.,•The most consistent hemostatic abnormalities with COVID-19 include mild thrombocytopenia and increased D-dimer levels.,•In COVID-19 patients with high D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,•Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.,An increased risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit has been reported.,The most consistent hemostatic abnormalities with COVID-19 include mild thrombocytopenia and increased D-dimer levels.,In COVID-19 patients with high D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.

To present a single-centre experience on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for the assessment of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-high risk of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).,We analysed consecutive COVID-19 patients (RT-PCR confirmed) undergoing CTPA in March 2020 for PTE clinical suspicion.,Clinical data were retrieved.,Two experienced radiologists reviewed CTPAs to assess pulmonary parenchyma and vascular findings.,Among 34 patients who underwent CTPA, 26 had PTE (76%, 20 males, median age 61 years, interquartile range 54-70), 20/26 (77%) with comorbidities (mainly hypertension, 44%), and 8 (31%) subsequently dying.,Eight PTE patients were under thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin, four PTE patients had lower-limbs deep vein thrombosis at ultrasound examination (performed in 33/34 patients).,Bilateral PTE characterised 19/26 cases, with main branches involved in 10/26 cases.,Twelve patients had a parenchymal involvement >75%, the predominant pneumonia pattern being consolidation in 10/26 patients, ground glass opacities in 9/26, crazy paving in 5/26, and both ground glass opacities and consolidation in 2/26.,COVID-19 patients are prone to PTE.,PTE, potentially attributable to an underlying thrombophilic status, may be more frequent than expected in COVID-19 patients.,Extension of prophylaxis and adaptation of diagnostic criteria should be considered.

Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients.,Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.,All patients referred to 4 intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 between March 3rd and 31st 2020 were included.,Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected.,Propensity score matching was performed to analyze the occurrence of thromboembolic events between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients.,150 COVID-19 patients were included (122 men, median age 63 [53; 71] years, SAPSII 49 [37; 64] points).,Sixty-four clinically relevant thrombotic complications were diagnosed in 150 patients, mainly pulmonary embolisms (16.7%). 28/29 patients (96.6%) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy experienced circuit clotting.,Three thrombotic occlusions (in 2 patients) of centrifugal pump occurred in 12 patients (8%) supported by ECMO.,Most patients (> 95%) had elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen.,No patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation.,Von Willebrand (vWF) activity, vWF antigen and FVIII were considerably increased, and 50/57 tested patients (87.7%) had positive lupus anticoagulant.,Comparison with non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 145) confirmed that COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 77) developed significantly more thrombotic complications, mainly pulmonary embolisms (11.7 vs.,2.1%, p < 0.008).,Coagulation parameters significantly differed between the two groups.,Despite anticoagulation, a high number of patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 developed life-threatening thrombotic complications.,Higher anticoagulation targets than in usual critically ill patients should therefore probably be suggested.,The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06062-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In search of improved risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), CMR imaging has been implicated as a potential tool for prediction of sudden cardiac death (SCD).,In follow-up of the promising results with extensive late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), high signal-intensity on T2-weighted imaging (HighT2) has become subject of interest given its association with markers of adverse disease progression, such as LGE, elevated troponin and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia.,In lack of follow-up cohorts, we initiated an exploratory study on the association between HighT2 and the internationally defined risk categories of SCD.,In a cohort of 109 HCM patients from a multicenter study on CMR imaging and biomarkers, we estimated the 5-year SCD risk (HCM Risk-SCD model).,Patients were categorized as low (< 4%), intermediate (≥ 4-<6%) or high (≥ 6%) risk.,In addition, risk categorization according to the ACC/AHA guidelines was performed.,HighT2 was present in 27% (29/109).,Patients with HighT2 were more often at an intermediate-high risk of SCD according to the European (28 vs. 10%, p = .032) and American guidelines (41 vs. 18%, p = .010) compared to those without HighT2.,The estimated 5-year SCD risk of our cohort was 1.9% (IQR 1.3-2.9%), and projected SCD rates were higher in patients with than without HighT2 (2.8 vs.,1.8%, p = .002).,In conclusion, HCM patients with HighT2 were more likely to be intermediate-high risk, with projected SCD rates that were 1.5 fold higher than in patients without HighT2.,These pilot findings call for corroborative studies with more intermediate-high risk HCM patients and clinical follow-up to assess whether HighT2 may have additional value to current risk stratification.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1252-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Blood flow dynamics make it possible to better understand the development of aortopathy and cardiovascular events in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS).,Aortic 3D blood flow characteristics were investigated in relation to aortic geometry in children and adolescents with MFS.,Twenty-five MFS patients (age 15.6 ± 4.0 years; 11 females) and 21 healthy controls (age 16.0 ± 2.6 years; 12 females) underwent magnetic resonance angiography and 4D flow CMR for assessment of thoracic aortic size and 3D blood flow velocities.,Data analysis included calculation of aortic diameter and BSA-indexed aortic dimensions (Z-score) along the thoracic aorta, 3D mean systolic wall shear stress (WSSmean) in ten aortic segments and assessment of aortic blood flow patterns.,Aortic root (root), ascending (AAo) and descending (DAo) aortic size was significantly larger in MFS patients than healthy controls (Root Z-score: 3.56 ± 1.45 vs 0.49 ± 0.78, p < 0.001; AAo Z-score 0.21 ± 0.95 vs −0.54 ± 0.64, p = 0.004; proximal DAo Z-score 2.02 ± 1.60 vs 0.56 ± 0.66, p < 0.001).,A regional variation in prevalence and severity of flow patterns (vortex and helix flow patterns) was observed, with the aortic root and the proximal DAo (pDAo) being more frequently affected in MFS.,MFS patients had significantly reduced WSSmean in the proximal AAo (pAAo) outer segment (0.65 ± 0.12 vs.,0.73 ± 0.14 Pa, p = 0.029) and pDAo inner segment (0.74 ± 0.17 vs.,0.87 ± 0.21 Pa, p = 0.021), as well as higher WSSmean in the inner segment of the distal AAo (0.94 ± 0.14 vs.,0.84 ± 0.15 Pa, p = 0.036) compared to healthy subjects.,An inverse relationship existed between pDAo WSSmean and both pDAo diameter (R = −0.53, p < 0.001) and % diameter change along the pDAo segment (R = −0.64, p < 0.001).,MFS children and young adults have altered aortic flow patterns and differences in aortic WSS that were most pronounced in the pAAo and pDAo, segments where aortic dissection or rupture often originate.,The presence of vortex flow patterns and abnormal WSS correlated with regional size of the pDAo and are potentially valuable additional markers of disease severity.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0345-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role of clinical laboratory data in the differential diagnosis of the severe forms of COVID‐19 has not been definitely established.,The aim of this study was to look for the warning index in severe COVID‐19 patients.,We investigated 43 adult patients with COVID‐19.,The patients were classified into mild group (28 patients) and severe group (15 patients).,A comparison of the hematological parameters between the mild and severe groups showed significant differences in interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), d‐dimer (d‐D), glucose, thrombin time, fibrinogen, and C‐reactive protein (P < .05).,The optimal threshold and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) of IL‐6 were 24.3 and 0.795 µg/L, respectively, while those of d‐D were 0.28 and 0.750 µg/L, respectively.,The area under the ROC curve of IL‐6 combined with d‐D was 0.840.,The specificity of predicting the severity of COVID‐19 during IL‐6 and d‐D tandem testing was up to 93.3%, while the sensitivity of IL‐6 and d‐D by parallel test in the severe COVID‐19 was 96.4%.,IL‐6 and d‐D were closely related to the occurrence of severe COVID‐19 in the adult patients, and their combined detection had the highest specificity and sensitivity for early prediction of the severity of COVID‐19 patients, which has important clinical value.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), a viral respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), may predispose patients to thrombotic disease, both in the venous and arterial circulations, because of excessive inflammation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis.,In addition, many patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic disease may develop COVID-19, which can have implications for choice, dosing, and laboratory monitoring of antithrombotic therapy.,Moreover, during a time with much focus on COVID-19, it is critical to consider how to optimize the available technology to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease.,Herein, the authors review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, epidemiology, management, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who develop venous or arterial thrombosis, of those with pre-existing thrombotic disease who develop COVID-19, or those who need prevention or care for their thrombotic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.,•COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,•Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,•Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,•The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.,COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.

A new type of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks recently in China and spreads into many other countries.,This disease, named as COVID-19, is similar to patients infected by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and nearly 20% of patients developed severe condition.,Cardiac injury is a prevalent complication of severe patients, exacerbating the disease severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.,Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the key host cellular receptor of SARS-CoV-2, has been identified in multiple organs, but its cellular distribution in human heart is not illuminated clearly.,This study performed the first state-of-art single cell atlas of adult human heart, and revealed that pericytes with high expression of ACE2 might act as the target cardiac cell of SARS-CoV-2.,The pericytes injury due to virus infection may result in capillary endothelial cells dysfunction, inducing microvascular dysfunction.,And patients with basic heart failure disease showed increased ACE2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, meaning that if infected by the virus these patients may have higher risk of heart attack and critically ill condition.,The finding of this study explains the high rate of severe cases among COVID-19 patients with basic cardiovascular disease; and these results also perhaps provide important reference to clinical treatment of cardiac injury among severe patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), a viral respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), may predispose patients to thrombotic disease, both in the venous and arterial circulations, because of excessive inflammation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis.,In addition, many patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic disease may develop COVID-19, which can have implications for choice, dosing, and laboratory monitoring of antithrombotic therapy.,Moreover, during a time with much focus on COVID-19, it is critical to consider how to optimize the available technology to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease.,Herein, the authors review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, epidemiology, management, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who develop venous or arterial thrombosis, of those with pre-existing thrombotic disease who develop COVID-19, or those who need prevention or care for their thrombotic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.,•COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,•Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,•Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,•The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.,COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications.,To investigate the incidence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Single‐center cohort study of 198 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Seventy‐five patients (38%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).,At time of data collection, 16 (8%) were still hospitalized and 19% had died.,During a median follow‐up of 7 days (IQR, 3‐13), 39 patients (20%) were diagnosed with VTE of whom 25 (13%) had symptomatic VTE, despite routine thrombosis prophylaxis.,The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days were 16% (95% CI, 10‐22), 33% (95% CI, 23‐43) and 42% (95% CI 30‐54) respectively.,For symptomatic VTE, these were 10% (95% CI, 5.8‐16), 21% (95% CI, 14‐30) and 25% (95% CI 16‐36).,VTE appeared to be associated with death (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.02‐5.5).,The cumulative incidence of VTE was higher in the ICU (26% (95% CI, 17‐37), 47% (95% CI, 34‐58), and 59% (95% CI, 42‐72) at 7, 14 and 21 days) than on the wards (any VTE and symptomatic VTE 5.8% (95% CI, 1.4‐15), 9.2% (95% CI, 2.6‐21), and 9.2% (2.6‐21) at 7, 14, and 21 days).,The observed risk for VTE in COVID‐19 is high, particularly in ICU patients, which should lead to a high level of clinical suspicion and low threshold for diagnostic imaging for DVT or PE.,Future research should focus on optimal diagnostic and prophylactic strategies to prevent VTE and potentially improve survival.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in hospitalised patients [1-5].,Risk factors include older age, obesity, immobilisation, active malignancy, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), (major) surgery, thrombophilia and a history of thromboembolism [2, 5].,In 1884, Rudolph Virchow first described the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, which consist of endothelial cell dysfunction/inflammation, low blood flow and blood hypercoagulability.,Current guidelines recommend the use of thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients who are at high risk for VTE (Padua score ≥4, IMPROVE (International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism) score ≥2) [6].,However, in medical practice, less than half of the patients at risk receive adequate thromboprophylaxis [4].,Insidiousvenous thromboembolism (VTE) is mainly a problem in ICU-ventilated SARS-CoV-2 patients, while patients in the general ward, treated with thromboprophylaxis (0.5 mg·kg−1), had a low incidence of insidious VTEhttps://bit.ly/2Yl8jft

Coil occlusion has become the standard treatment for many ruptured aneurysms.,However, specific aneurysm structures pose technical difficulties and may require the use of adjunctive neck-bridging devices, which necessitate the use of dual antiplatelet therapy.,The hydrophilic polymer coating (pHPC, phenox) is a surface modification that inhibits platelet adhesion.,To present initial experience with the pCONUS HPC device as an adjunct to coil embolization for ruptured aneurysms using single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT).,All patients who were treated with the pCONUS HPC for ruptured aneurysms using SAPT were retrospectively identified.,The occurrence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications was recorded together with the angiographic and clinical follow-up details.,Fifteen patients were identified (nine female) with a median age of 54 years (range 27-81).,Six aneurysms were located at the anterior communicating artery, five at the middle cerebral artery bifurcation, two at the basilar artery bifurcation, one at the posterior communicating artery, and one involving the intradural internal carotid artery.,Ten patients (66.6%) achieved modified Raymond-Roy classification I or II at post-treatment angiography, with 45.5% of patients having adequate occlusion (defined as complete occlusion or neck remnant) at follow-up.,All patients received acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) as SAPT before and after the procedure.,Intraprocedural thrombus formation was seen in three patients (20%), resolving in two patients after a bolus dose of eptifibatide, and one treated with mechanical aspiration.,No clinical or radiological consequences were seen.,There were no recurrent aneurysm ruptures.,One patient died owing to cerebral vasospasm.,This initial clinical experience highlights the possibility and limitations of using the pCONUS HPC device in the treatment of complex ruptured aneurysm with ASA as SAPT.,Randomized trials with longer follow-up in larger cohorts are underway.

Recently, numerous devices dedicated to the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms have become available.,We present our initial experience with the pCANvas device and present the technical success rate, clinical outcome and immediate angiographic occlusion rates.,We sought to determine the efficacy of flow with the pCANvas for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.,We performed a retrospective review of our prospectively collected data to identify patients treated with the pCANvas device between February 2015 and February 2017.,The patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, immediate and delayed clinical and radiographic follow-up data were recorded.,We identified 17 patients (13 female) treated only with the pCANvas device.,The average age of the patients was 60.5 ± 13.3 years (range 25-75 years).,The average dome width was 7.6 ± 3.2 mm (range 3-15.8 mm), dome height 7.1 ± 3.2 mm (range 3-12.9 mm) and neck width 5.4 ± 3.2 (range 3-16.3 mm).,The average aspect ratio was 1.5 ± 0.8 (range 0.6-3.7).,At the end of the procedure 15 aneurysms continued complete filling of the aneurysm (Raymond Roy Classification[RRC] 3) with 2 aneurysms showing only filling of the neck of the aneurysm (RRC 2).,Early follow-up angiography was available for 16 patients and at this stage 11 aneurysms showed persistent and complete filling of the aneurysm (RRC 3), 5 aneurysms showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm (RRC 1) and 7 aneurysms underwent repeat treatment with coiling.,The early results on the use of the pCANvas are promising; however, longer term follow-up and larger studies are required.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications.,To investigate the incidence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Single‐center cohort study of 198 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.,Seventy‐five patients (38%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).,At time of data collection, 16 (8%) were still hospitalized and 19% had died.,During a median follow‐up of 7 days (IQR, 3‐13), 39 patients (20%) were diagnosed with VTE of whom 25 (13%) had symptomatic VTE, despite routine thrombosis prophylaxis.,The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days were 16% (95% CI, 10‐22), 33% (95% CI, 23‐43) and 42% (95% CI 30‐54) respectively.,For symptomatic VTE, these were 10% (95% CI, 5.8‐16), 21% (95% CI, 14‐30) and 25% (95% CI 16‐36).,VTE appeared to be associated with death (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.02‐5.5).,The cumulative incidence of VTE was higher in the ICU (26% (95% CI, 17‐37), 47% (95% CI, 34‐58), and 59% (95% CI, 42‐72) at 7, 14 and 21 days) than on the wards (any VTE and symptomatic VTE 5.8% (95% CI, 1.4‐15), 9.2% (95% CI, 2.6‐21), and 9.2% (2.6‐21) at 7, 14, and 21 days).,The observed risk for VTE in COVID‐19 is high, particularly in ICU patients, which should lead to a high level of clinical suspicion and low threshold for diagnostic imaging for DVT or PE.,Future research should focus on optimal diagnostic and prophylactic strategies to prevent VTE and potentially improve survival.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that has affected more than 1.8 million people worldwide, overwhelmed health care systems owing to the high proportion of critical presentations, and resulted in more than 100,000 deaths.,Since the first data analyses in China, elevated cardiac troponin has been noted in a substantial proportion of patients, implicating myocardial injury as a possible pathogenic mechanism contributing to severe illness and mortality.,Accordingly, high troponin levels are associated with increased mortality in patients with COVID-19.,This brief review explores the available evidence regarding the association between COVID-19 and myocardial injury.

Parametric mapping techniques provide a non-invasive tool for quantifying tissue alterations in myocardial disease in those eligible for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).,Parametric mapping with CMR now permits the routine spatial visualization and quantification of changes in myocardial composition based on changes in T1, T2, and T2*(star) relaxation times and extracellular volume (ECV).,These changes include specific disease pathways related to mainly intracellular disturbances of the cardiomyocyte (e.g., iron overload, or glycosphingolipid accumulation in Anderson-Fabry disease); extracellular disturbances in the myocardial interstitium (e.g., myocardial fibrosis or cardiac amyloidosis from accumulation of collagen or amyloid proteins, respectively); or both (myocardial edema with increased intracellular and/or extracellular water).,Parametric mapping promises improvements in patient care through advances in quantitative diagnostics, inter- and intra-patient comparability, and relatedly improvements in treatment.,There is a multitude of technical approaches and potential applications.,This document provides a summary of the existing evidence for the clinical value of parametric mapping in the heart as of mid 2017, and gives recommendations for practical use in different clinical scenarios for scientists, clinicians, and CMR manufacturers.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,CMR T1 mapping is a quantitative imaging technique allowing the assessment of myocardial injury early after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.,We sought to investigate the ability of acute native T1 mapping to differentiate reversible and irreversible myocardial injury and its predictive value for left ventricular remodeling.,Sixty ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients underwent acute and 6-month 3T CMR, including cine, T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, native shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping, rest first pass perfusion, and late gadolinium enhancement.,T1 cutoff values for oedematous versus necrotic myocardium were identified as 1251 ms and 1400 ms, respectively, with prediction accuracy of 96.7% (95% confidence interval, 82.8% to 99.9%).,Using the proposed threshold of 1400 ms, the volume of irreversibly damaged tissue was in good agreement with the 6-month late gadolinium enhancement volume (r=0.99) and correlated strongly with the log area under the curve troponin (r=0.80) and strongly with 6-month ejection fraction (r=−0.73).,Acute T1 values were a strong predictor of 6-month wall thickening compared with late gadolinium enhancement.,Acute native shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping differentiates reversible and irreversible myocardial injury, and it is a strong predictor of left ventricular remodeling in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.,A single CMR acquisition of native T1 mapping could potentially represent a fast, safe, and accurate method for early stratification of acute patients in need of more aggressive treatment.,Further confirmatory studies will be needed.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may complicate the course of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).,To evaluate the incidence of VTE in patients with COVID-19.,MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched up to 24th June 2020 for studies that evaluated the incidence of VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in patients with COVID-19.,Pooled proportions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals (PI) were calculated by random-effect meta-analysis.,3487 patients from 30 studies were included.,Based on very low-quality evidence due to heterogeneity and risk of bias, the incidence of VTE was 26% (95% PI, 6%-66%).,PE with or without DVT occurred in 12% of patients (95% PI, 2%-46%) and DVT alone in 14% (95% PI, 1%-75%).,Studies using standard algorithms for clinically suspected VTE reported PE in 13% of patients (95% PI, 2%-57%) and DVT in 6% (95% PI, 0%-60%), compared to 11% (95% PI, 2%-46%) and 24% (95% PI, 2%-85%) in studies using other diagnostic strategies or patient sampling.,In patients admitted to intensive care units, VTE occurred in 24% (95% PI, 5%-66%), PE in 19% (95% PI, 6%-47%), and DVT alone in 7% (95% PI, 0%-69%).,Corresponding values in general wards were respectively 9% (95% PI, 0%-94%), 4% (95% PI, 0%-100%), and 7% (95% CI, 1%-49%).,VTE represents a frequent complication in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and often occurs as PE.,The threshold for clinical suspicion should be low to trigger prompt diagnostic testing.,•Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) is unclear.,•A total of 3487 patients with COVID-19 were included in 30 observational studies.,•VTE incidence varied due to differences in diagnostic protocols and hospital setting.,•VTE risk was higher in intensive care units, but seemed also substantial in general wards despite prophylaxis.,Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) is unclear.,A total of 3487 patients with COVID-19 were included in 30 observational studies.,VTE incidence varied due to differences in diagnostic protocols and hospital setting.,VTE risk was higher in intensive care units, but seemed also substantial in general wards despite prophylaxis.

An increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) has been reported.,Whether COVID-19 increases the risk of VTE in non-ICU wards remains unknown.,We aimed to evaluate the burden of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in COVID-19 patients with elevated D-dimer levels.,In this prospective study consecutive patients hospitalized in non-intensive care units with diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and D-dimer > 1000 ng/ml were screened for asymptomatic DVT with complete compression doppler ultrasound (CCUS).,The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.,The study comprised 156 patients (65.4% male).,All but three patients received standard doses of thromboprophylaxis.,Median days of hospitalization until CCUS was 9 (IQR 5-17).,CCUS was positive for DVT in 23 patients (14.7%), of whom only one was proximal DVT.,Seven patients (4.5%) had bilateral distal DVT.,Patients with DVT had higher median D-dimer levels: 4527 (IQR 1925-9144) ng/ml vs 2050 (IQR 1428-3235) ng/ml; p < 0.001.,D-dimer levels > 1570 ng/ml were associated with asymptomatic DVT (OR 9.1; CI 95% 1.1-70.1).,D-dimer showed an acceptable discriminative capacity (area under the ROC curve 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.84).,In patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.,•An increased risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit has been reported.,•The most consistent hemostatic abnormalities with COVID-19 include mild thrombocytopenia and increased D-dimer levels.,•In COVID-19 patients with high D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,•Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.,An increased risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit has been reported.,The most consistent hemostatic abnormalities with COVID-19 include mild thrombocytopenia and increased D-dimer levels.,In COVID-19 patients with high D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series.,Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.

The study aimed to seek potential biomarkers for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) detection and treatment.,The dataset GSE48060 was used, consisting of 52 peripheral blood samples (31 AMI samples and 21 normal controls).,By limma package, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between 2 kinds of samples were identified, followed by enrichment analysis, subpathway analysis, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, and transcription factor network (TFN) analysis.,Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was used to further extract key modules relating to AMI, followed by enrichment and TFN analyses.,Expression validation was performed via meta-analysis of 2 datasets, GSE22229 and GSE29111.,A set of 428 DEGs in AMI were screened out, and the upregulated toll-like receptor (TLR) family genes (TLR1, TLR2, and TLR10) were enriched in wound response, immune response and inflammatory response functions, and downregulated genes (GBP5, CXCL5, GZMA, CCL5, and CCL4) were correlated with immune response.,CCL5, GZMA, GZMB, TLR2, and formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) were predicted as crucial nodes in the PPI network.,Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) was the key transcription factor (TF) with multiple targets.,The grey module was highly related to AMI.,Genes in this module were closely related to regulation of macrophage activation, and spermatogenic leucine zipper 1 (SPZ1) was identified as a TF.,Expressions of TLR2 and FPR1 were confirmed via the integrated matrix.,Several potential biomarkers for AMI detection were identified, such as GZMB, GBP5, FPR1, TLR2, STAT1, and SPZ1.,They might exert their functions via regulation of immune and inflammation responses.,Genes in grey module play significant roles in AMI via regulation of macrophage activation.

Chest pain is a leading reason patients seek medical evaluation.,While assays to detect myocyte death are used to diagnose a heart attack (acute myocardial infarction, AMI), there is no biomarker to indicate an impending cardiac event.,Transcriptional patterns present in circulating endothelial cells (CEC) may provide a window into the plaque rupture process and identify a proximal biomarker for AMI.,Thus, we aimed to identify a transcriptomic signature of AMI present in whole blood, but derived from CECs.,Candidate genes indicative of AMI were nominated from microarray of enriched CEC samples, and then verified for detectability and predictive potential via qPCR in whole blood.,This signature was validated in an independent cohort.,Our findings suggest that a whole blood CEC-derived molecular signature identifies patients with AMI and sets the framework to potentially identify the earlier stages of an impending cardiac event when used in concert with clinical history and other diagnostics where conventional biomarkers indicative of myonecrosis remain undetected.

There is growing evidence that chronic hyperglycemia leads to the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) which exerts its effect via interaction with the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE).,AGE-RAGE activation results in oxidative stress and inflammation.,It is well known that this mechanism is involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in diabetes.,Kaempferol, a dietary flavonoid, is known to possess antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory activities.,However, little is known about the effect of kaempferol on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury in diabetic rats.,Diabetes was induced in male albino Wistar rats using streptozotocin (70 mg/kg; i.p.), and rats with glucose level >250 mg/dL were considered as diabetic.,Diabetic rats were treated with vehicle (2 mL/kg; i.p.) and kaempferol (20 mg/kg; i.p.) daily for a period of 28 days and on the 28th day, ischemia was produced by one-stage ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery for 45 min followed by reperfusion for 60 min.,After completion of surgery, rats were sacrificed and the heart tissue was processed for biochemical, morphological, and molecular studies.,Kaempferol pretreatment significantly reduced hyperglycemia, maintained hemodynamic function, suppressed AGE-RAGE axis activation, normalized oxidative stress, and preserved morphological alterations.,In addition, there was decreased level of inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and NF-κB), inhibition of active c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 proteins, and activation of Extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) a prosurvival kinase.,Furthermore, it also attenuated apoptosis by reducing the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins (Bax and Caspase-3), Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) positive cells, and increasing the level of anti-apoptotic protein (Bcl-2).,In conclusion, kaempferol attenuated myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in diabetic rats by reducing AGE-RAGE/ mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) induced oxidative stress and inflammation.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) has been increasingly considered as a main cause of heart failure and death in diabetic patients.,At present, no effective treatment exists to prevent its development.,In the present study, we describe the potential protective effects and mechanisms of myricitrin (Myr) on the cardiac function of streptozotosin-induced diabetic mice and on advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-induced H9c2 cardiomyocytes.,In vitro experiments revealed that pretreatment with Myr significantly decreased AGEs-induced inflammatory cytokine expression, limited an increase in ROS levels, and reduced cell apoptosis, fibrosis, and hypertrophy in H9c2 cells.,These effects are correlated with Nrf2 activation and NF-κB inhibition.,In vivo investigation demonstrated that oral administration of Myr at 300 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks remarkably decreased the expression of enzymes associated with cardiomyopathy, as well as the expression of inflammatory cytokines and apoptotic proteins.,Finally, Myr improved diastolic dysfunction and attenuated histological abnormalities.,Mechanistically, Myr attenuated diabetes-induced Nrf2 inhibition via the regulation of Akt and ERK phosphorylation in the diabetic heart.,Collectively, these results strongly indicate that Myr exerts cardioprotective effects against DCM through the blockage of inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis.,This suggests that Myr might be a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of DCM.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,We aimed to investigate the acute stroke presentations during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.,The data were obtained from a health system with 19 emergency departments in northeast Ohio in the United States.,Baseline period from January 1 to March 8, 2020, was compared with the COVID period from March 9, to April 2, 2020.,The variables included were total daily stroke alerts across the hospital emergency departments, thrombolysis, time to presentation, stroke severity, time from door-to-imaging, time from door-to-needle in thrombolysis, and time from door-to-puncture in thrombectomy.,The 2 time periods were compared using nonparametric statistics and Poisson regression.,Nine hundred two stroke alerts during the period across the emergency departments were analyzed.,Total daily stroke alerts decreased from median, 10 (interquartile range, 8-13) during baseline period to median, 8 (interquartile range, 4-10, P=0.001) during COVID period.,Time to presentation, stroke severity, and time to treatment were unchanged.,COVID period was associated with decrease in stroke alerts with rate ratio of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60-0.28).,Thrombolysis also decreased with rate ratio, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.28-0.97) but thrombectomy remained unchanged rate ratio, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.52-1.62),We observed a significant decrease in acute stroke presentations by ≈30% across emergency departments at the time of surge of COVID-19 cases.,This observation could be attributed to true decline in stroke incidence or patients not seeking medical attention for emergencies during the pandemic.

Since the onset of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, doctors and public authorities have demonstrated concern about the reduction in quality of care for other health conditions due to social restrictions and lack of resources.,Using a population-based stroke registry, we investigated the impact of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in stroke admissions in Joinville, Brazil.,Patients admitted after the onset of COVID-19 restrictions in the city (defined as March 17, 2020) were compared with those admitted in 2019.,We analyzed differences between stroke incidence, types, severity, reperfusion therapies, and time from stroke onset to admission.,Statistical tests were also performed to compare the 30 days before and after COVID-19 to the same period in 2019.,We observed a decrease in total stroke admissions from an average of 12.9/100 000 per month in 2019 to 8.3 after COVID-19 (P=0.0029).,When compared with the same period in 2019, there was a 36.4% reduction in stroke admissions.,There was no difference in admissions for severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >8), intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.,The onset of COVID-19 was correlated with a reduction in admissions for transient, mild, and moderate strokes.,Given the need to prevent the worsening of symptoms and the occurrence of medical complications in these groups, a reorganization of the stroke-care networks is necessary to reduce collateral damage caused by COVID-19.

COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) characterized by the elevated D-dimer without remarkable changes of other global coagulation markers is associated with various thrombotic complications and disease severity.,The purpose of this review is to elucidate the pathophysiology of this unique coagulopathy.,The authors performed online search of published medical literature through PubMed using the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) term "COVID-19," "SARS-CoV-2," "coronavirus," "coagulopathy," and "thrombus.",Then, selected 51 articles that closely relevant to coagulopathy in COVID-19.,The primary targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are the pneumocytes, immune cells, and vascular endothelial cells.,The alveolar damage and the pulmonary microvascular thrombosis are the major causes of acute lung injury in COVID-19.,The endotheliopathy that occurs is due to direct SARS-CoV-2 infection and activation of other pathways that include the immune system and thromboinflammatory responses leading to what is termed CAC.,As a result, both microvascular and macrovascular thrombotic events occur in arterial, capillary, venule, and large vein vascular beds to produce multiorgan dysfunction and thrombotic complications.,In addition to the endothelial damage, SARS-CoV-2 also can cause vasculitis and presents as a systemic inflammatory vascular disease.,Clinical management of COVID-19 includes anticoagulation but novel therapies for endotheliopathy, hypercoagulability, and vasculitis are needed.,The endotheliopathy due to direct endothelial infection with SARS-COV-2 and the indirect damage caused by inflammation play the predominant role in the development of CAC.,The intensive control of thromboinflammation is necessary to improve the outcome of this highly detrimental contagious disease.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly become pandemic, with substantial mortality.,To evaluate the pathologic changes of organ systems and the clinicopathologic basis for severe and fatal outcomes.,Prospective autopsy study.,Single pathology department.,11 deceased patients with COVID-19 (10 of whom were selected at random for autopsy).,Systematic macroscopic, histopathologic, and viral analysis (SARS-CoV-2 on real-time polymerase chain reaction assay), with correlation of pathologic and clinical features, including comorbidities, comedication, and laboratory values.,Patients' age ranged from 66 to 91 years (mean, 80.5 years; 8 men, 3 women).,Ten of the 11 patients received prophylactic anticoagulant therapy; venous thromboembolism was not clinically suspected antemortem in any of the patients.,Both lungs showed various stages of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), including edema, hyaline membranes, and proliferation of pneumocytes and fibroblasts.,Thrombosis of small and mid-sized pulmonary arteries was found in various degrees in all 11 patients and was associated with infarction in 8 patients and bronchopneumonia in 6 patients.,Kupffer cell proliferation was seen in all patients, and chronic hepatic congestion in 8 patients.,Other changes in the liver included hepatic steatosis, portal fibrosis, lymphocytic infiltrates and ductular proliferation, lobular cholestasis, and acute liver cell necrosis, together with central vein thrombosis.,Additional frequent findings included renal proximal tubular injury, focal pancreatitis, adrenocortical hyperplasia, and lymphocyte depletion of spleen and lymph nodes.,Viral RNA was detectable in pharyngeal, bronchial, and colonic mucosa but not bile.,The sample was small.,COVID-19 predominantly involves the lungs, causing DAD and leading to acute respiratory insufficiency.,Death may be caused by the thrombosis observed in segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arterial vessels despite the use of prophylactic anticoagulation.,Studies are needed to further understand the thrombotic complications of COVID-19, together with the roles for strict thrombosis prophylaxis, laboratory, and imaging studies and early anticoagulant therapy for suspected pulmonary arterial thrombosis or thromboembolism.,None.,The clinicopathological basis for morbidity and mortality with SARS-CoV-2 infection is not well understood.,This study reports the clinical and autopsy findings of patients who died of COVID-19.

This study sought to determine whether T2 cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can stage both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic myocardial infarctions (MIs).,CMR-based staging of MI with or without contrast agents relies on the resolution of T2 elevations in the chronic phase, but whether this approach can be used to stage both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic MIs is unclear.,Hemorrhagic (n = 15) and nonhemorrhagic (n = 9) MIs were created in dogs.,Multiparametric noncontrast mapping (T1, T2, and T2*) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were performed at 1.5- and 3.0-T at 5 days (acute) and 8 weeks (chronic) post-MI.,CMR relaxation values and LGE intensities of hemorrhagic, peri-hemorrhagic, nonhemorrhagic, and remote territories were measured.,Histopathology was performed to elucidate CMR findings.,T2 of nonhemorrhagic MIs was significantly elevated in the acute phase relative to remote territories (1.5-T: 39.8 ± 12.8%; 3.0-T: 27.9 ± 16.5%; p < 0.0001 for both) but resolved to remote values by week 8 (1.5-T: −0.0 ± 3.2%; p = 0.678; 3.0-T: −0.5 ± 5.9%; p = 0.601).,In hemorrhagic MI, T2 of hemorrhage core was significantly elevated in the acute phase (1.5-T: 17.7 ± 10.0%; 3.0-T: 8.6 ± 8.2%; p < 0.0001 for both) but decreased below remote values by week 8 (1.5-T: −8.2 ± 3.9%; 3.0-T: −5.6 ± 6.0%; p < 0.0001 for both).,In contrast, T2 of the periphery of hemorrhage within the MI zone was significantly elevated in the acute phase relative to remote territories (1.5-T: 35.0 ± 16.1%; 3.0-T: 24.2 ± 10.4%; p < 0.0001 for both) and remained elevated at 8 weeks post-MI (1.5-T: 8.6 ± 5.1%; 3.0-T: 6.0 ± 3.3%; p < 0.0001 for both).,The observed elevation of T2 in the peri-hemorrhagic zone of MIs and the absence of T2 elevation in nonhemorrhagic MIs were consistent with ongoing or absence of histological evidence of inflammation, respectively.,Hemorrhagic MIs are associated with persisting myocardial inflammation and edema, which can confound staging of hemorrhagic MIs when T2 elevations alone are used to discriminate between acute and chronic MI.,Moreover, given the poor prognosis in patients with hemorrhagic MI, CMR evidence for myocardial hemorrhage with persistent edema may evolve as a risk marker in patients after acute MI.

Parametric mapping techniques provide a non-invasive tool for quantifying tissue alterations in myocardial disease in those eligible for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).,Parametric mapping with CMR now permits the routine spatial visualization and quantification of changes in myocardial composition based on changes in T1, T2, and T2*(star) relaxation times and extracellular volume (ECV).,These changes include specific disease pathways related to mainly intracellular disturbances of the cardiomyocyte (e.g., iron overload, or glycosphingolipid accumulation in Anderson-Fabry disease); extracellular disturbances in the myocardial interstitium (e.g., myocardial fibrosis or cardiac amyloidosis from accumulation of collagen or amyloid proteins, respectively); or both (myocardial edema with increased intracellular and/or extracellular water).,Parametric mapping promises improvements in patient care through advances in quantitative diagnostics, inter- and intra-patient comparability, and relatedly improvements in treatment.,There is a multitude of technical approaches and potential applications.,This document provides a summary of the existing evidence for the clinical value of parametric mapping in the heart as of mid 2017, and gives recommendations for practical use in different clinical scenarios for scientists, clinicians, and CMR manufacturers.

Early studies suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high incidence of cardiac arrhythmias.,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection may cause injury to cardiac myocytes and increase arrhythmia risk.,The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of cardiac arrest and arrhythmias including incident atrial fibrillation (AF), bradyarrhythmias, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in a large urban population hospitalized for COVID-19.,We also evaluated correlations between the presence of these arrhythmias and mortality.,We reviewed the characteristics of all patients with COVID-19 admitted to our center over a 9-week period.,Throughout hospitalization, we evaluated the incidence of cardiac arrests, arrhythmias, and inpatient mortality.,We also used logistic regression to evaluate age, sex, race, body mass index, prevalent cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and intensive care unit (ICU) status as potential risk factors for each arrhythmia.,Among 700 patients (mean age 50 ± 18 years; 45% men; 71% African American; 11% received ICU care), there were 9 cardiac arrests, 25 incident AF events, 9 clinically significant bradyarrhythmias, and 10 NSVTs.,All cardiac arrests occurred in patients admitted to the ICU.,In addition, admission to the ICU was associated with incident AF (odds ratio [OR] 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-13.18) and NSVT (OR 8.92; 95% CI 1.73-46.06) after multivariable adjustment.,Also, age and incident AF (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and prevalent heart failure and bradyarrhythmias (OR 9.75; 95% CI 1.95-48.65) were independently associated.,Only cardiac arrests were associated with acute in-hospital mortality.,Cardiac arrests and arrhythmias are likely the consequence of systemic illness and not solely the direct effects of COVID-19 infection.

Many patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have underlying cardiovascular (CV) disease or develop acute cardiac injury during the course of the illness.,Adequate understanding of the interplay between COVID-19 and CV disease is required for optimum management of these patients.,A literature search was done using PubMed and Google search engines to prepare a narrative review on this topic.,Respiratory illness is the dominant clinical manifestation of COVID-19; CV involvement occurs much less commonly.,Acute cardiac injury, defined as significant elevation of cardiac troponins, is the most commonly reported cardiac abnormality in COVID-19.,It occurs in approximately 8-12% of all patients.,Direct myocardial injury due to viral involvement of cardiomyocytes and the effect of systemic inflammation appear to be the most common mechanisms responsible for cardiac injury.,The information about other CV manifestations in COVID-19 is very limited at present.,Nonetheless, it has been consistently shown that the presence of pre-existing CV disease and/or development of acute cardiac injury are associated with significantly worse outcome in these patients.,Most of the current reports on COVID-19 have only briefly described CV manifestations in these patients.,Given the enormous burden posed by this illness and the significant adverse prognostic impact of cardiac involvement, further research is required to understand the incidence, mechanisms, clinical presentation and outcomes of various CV manifestations in COVID-19 patients.,•COVID-19 is primarily a respiratory illness but cardiovascular involvement can occur through several mechanisms.,•Acute cardiac injury is the most reported cardiovascular abnormality in COVID-19, with average incidence 8-12%•Underlying CVD and/or development of acute cardiac injury are associated with significantly worse outcome in these patients.,•Information about other cardiovascular manifestations is very limited at present.,COVID-19 is primarily a respiratory illness but cardiovascular involvement can occur through several mechanisms.,Acute cardiac injury is the most reported cardiovascular abnormality in COVID-19, with average incidence 8-12%,Underlying CVD and/or development of acute cardiac injury are associated with significantly worse outcome in these patients.,Information about other cardiovascular manifestations is very limited at present.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,Myocarditis has been recognized as a rare complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccinations, especially in young adult and adolescent males.,According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, myocarditis/pericarditis rates are ≈12.6 cases per million doses of second-dose mRNA vaccine among individuals 12 to 39 years of age.,In reported cases, patients with myocarditis invariably presented with chest pain, usually 2 to 3 days after a second dose of mRNA vaccination, and had elevated cardiac troponin levels.,ECG was abnormal with ST elevations in most, and cardiac MRI was suggestive of myocarditis in all tested patients.,There was no evidence of acute COVID-19 or other viral infections.,In 1 case, a cardiomyopathy gene panel was negative, but autoantibody levels against certain self-antigens and frequency of natural killer cells were increased.,Although the mechanisms for development of myocarditis are not clear, molecular mimicry between the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and self-antigens, trigger of preexisting dysregulated immune pathways in certain individuals, immune response to mRNA, and activation of immunologic pathways, and dysregulated cytokine expression have been proposed.,The reasons for male predominance in myocarditis cases are unknown, but possible explanations relate to sex hormone differences in immune response and myocarditis, and also underdiagnosis of cardiac disease in women.,Almost all patients had resolution of symptoms and signs and improvement in diagnostic markers and imaging with or without treatment.,Despite rare cases of myocarditis, the benefit-risk assessment for COVID-19 vaccination shows a favorable balance for all age and sex groups; therefore, COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone ≥12 years of age.

We report two cases of myocarditis, in two young and previously healthy individuals, temporally related to the second dose of the mRNA-COVID-19 vaccine.,Both patients developed acute chest pain, changes on electrocardiogram (ECG), and elevated serum troponin within two days of receiving their second dose.,Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings were consistent with acute myocarditis.

Optimal prophylactic and therapeutic management of thromboembolic disease in patients with COVID-19 remains a major challenge for clinicians.,The aim of this study was to define the incidence of thrombotic and haemorrhagic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19.,In addition, we sought to characterise coagulation profiles using thromboelastography and explore possible biological differences between patients with and without thrombotic complications.,We conducted a multicentre retrospective observational study evaluating all the COVID-19 patients received in four intensive care units (ICUs) of four tertiary hospitals in the UK between March 15, 2020, and May 05, 2020.,Clinical characteristics, laboratory data, thromboelastography profiles and clinical outcome data were evaluated between patients with and without thrombotic complications.,A total of 187 patients were included.,Their median (interquartile (IQR)) age was 57 (49-64) years and 124 (66.3%) patients were male.,Eighty-one (43.3%) patients experienced one or more clinically relevant thrombotic complications, which were mainly pulmonary emboli (n = 42 (22.5%)).,Arterial embolic complications were reported in 25 (13.3%) patients.,ICU length of stay was longer in patients with thrombotic complications when compared with those without.,Fifteen (8.0%) patients experienced haemorrhagic complications, of which nine (4.8%) were classified as major bleeding.,Thromboelastography demonstrated a hypercoagulable profile in patients tested but lacked discriminatory value between those with and without thrombotic complications.,Patients who experienced thrombotic complications had higher D-dimer, ferritin, troponin and white cell count levels at ICU admission compared with those that did not.,Critically ill patients with COVID-19 experience high rates of venous and arterial thrombotic complications.,The rates of bleeding may be higher than previously reported and re-iterate the need for randomised trials to better understand the risk-benefit ratio of different anticoagulation strategies.

Coagulopathy is a common abnormality in patients with COVID‐19.,However, the exact incidence of venous thromboembolic event is unknown in anticoagulated, severe COVID‐19 patients.,Systematic assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) using complete duplex ultrasound (CDU) in anticoagulated COVID‐19 patients.,We performed a retrospective study in 2 French intensive care units (ICU) where CDU is performed as a standard of care.,A CDU from thigh to ankle at selected sites with Doppler waveforms and images was performed early during ICU stay in patients admitted with COVID‐19.,Anticoagulation dose was left to the discretion of the treating physician based on the individual risk of thrombosis.,Patients were classified as treated with prophylactic anticoagulation or therapeutic anticoagulation.,Pulmonary embolism was systematically searched in patients with persistent hypoxemia or secondary deterioration.,From March 19 to April 11, 2020, 26 consecutive patients with severe COVID‐19 were screened for VTE.,Eight patients (31%) were treated with prophylactic anticoagulation, whereas 18 patients (69%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation.,The overall rate of VTE in patients was 69%.,The proportion of VTE was significantly higher in patients treated with prophylactic anticoagulation when compared with the other group (100% vs 56%, respectively, P = .03).,Surprisingly, we found a high rate of thromboembolic events in COVID‐19 patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation, with 56% of VTE and 6 pulmonary embolisms.,Our results suggest considering both systematic screening of VTE and early therapeutic anticoagulation in severe ICU COVID‐19 patients.

•Prevalence of pulmonary thromboembolic disease (PTE) is 38% in COVID-19 patients who underwent CTPA.,Patients with more severe COVID-19 changes are more likely to have PTE.,•Majority of PTE is observed within smaller pulmonary vessels (75%) and lungs demonstrating COVID-19 changes (72%).,Subsegmental vessels should be scrutinized for presence of PTE.,•D-dimer values may have potential in guiding anticoagulation therapy and evaluating prognosis in these patients.,Prevalence of pulmonary thromboembolic disease (PTE) is 38% in COVID-19 patients who underwent CTPA.,Patients with more severe COVID-19 changes are more likely to have PTE.,Majority of PTE is observed within smaller pulmonary vessels (75%) and lungs demonstrating COVID-19 changes (72%).,Subsegmental vessels should be scrutinized for presence of PTE.,D-dimer values may have potential in guiding anticoagulation therapy and evaluating prognosis in these patients.,To define the prevalence of pulmonary thromboembolic (PTE) disease diagnosed on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in COVID-19 patients.,To assess distribution of PTE and to evaluate for association between severity of COVID-19 disease, D-dimer values and incidence of PTE.,Patients with diagnosis of COVID-19 presenting to 5 different hospitals across Greater Manchester between 1st March 2020 and 30th April 2020 who had CTPA were included.,CTPA images were evaluated for presence of PTE, distribution of PTE (in small and/or large vessels) and distribution of PTE within lungs with or without COVID-19 CT changes.,Severity of COVID lung changes were graded.,D-dimer values within 72 hours of CTPA were obtained.,Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate for any significant association between variables. p values of ≤ 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.,A total of 974 patients presented across five hospital sites with COVID-19 infection.,Eighty-four (n = 84) COVID-19 patients underwent CTPA.,Of these, 38% (32/84) had PTE.,PTE was seen in small vessels in 75% (24/32) and in lungs demonstrating COVID-19 changes in 72% (23/32). 84% (27/32) of PTE positive patients had disease severity of moderate or higher score (p = 0.005).,D-dimer values were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.001) in PTE patients, median value in PTE group was 6441mcg/L(range219-90925).,A D-dimer cut off value of 2247mcg/L provides sensitivity of 0.72 and specificity of 0.74.,There is increased prevalence of PTE in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 disease.,D-dimer values may have potential in guiding anticoagulation therapy and prognostication.

COVID-19 may predispose to both venous and arterial thromboembolism due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation and diffuse intravascular coagulation.,Reports on the incidence of thrombotic complications are however not available.,We evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or systemic arterial embolism in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital.,We studied 184 ICU patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia of whom 23 died (13%), 22 were discharged alive (12%) and 139 (76%) were still on the ICU on April 5th 2020.,All patients received at least standard doses thromboprophylaxis.,The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 31% (95%CI 20-41), of which CTPA and/or ultrasonography confirmed VTE in 27% (95%CI 17-37%) and arterial thrombotic events in 3.7% (95%CI 0-8.2%).,PE was the most frequent thrombotic complication (n = 25, 81%).,Age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.05/per year, 95%CI 1.004-1.01) and coagulopathy, defined as spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time > 3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time > 5 s (aHR 4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.1), were independent predictors of thrombotic complications.,The 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU patients with COVID-19 infections is remarkably high.,Our findings reinforce the recommendation to strictly apply pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, and are strongly suggestive of increasing the prophylaxis towards high-prophylactic doses, even in the absence of randomized evidence.

Coagulopathy is a common abnormality in patients with COVID‐19.,However, the exact incidence of venous thromboembolic event is unknown in anticoagulated, severe COVID‐19 patients.,Systematic assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) using complete duplex ultrasound (CDU) in anticoagulated COVID‐19 patients.,We performed a retrospective study in 2 French intensive care units (ICU) where CDU is performed as a standard of care.,A CDU from thigh to ankle at selected sites with Doppler waveforms and images was performed early during ICU stay in patients admitted with COVID‐19.,Anticoagulation dose was left to the discretion of the treating physician based on the individual risk of thrombosis.,Patients were classified as treated with prophylactic anticoagulation or therapeutic anticoagulation.,Pulmonary embolism was systematically searched in patients with persistent hypoxemia or secondary deterioration.,From March 19 to April 11, 2020, 26 consecutive patients with severe COVID‐19 were screened for VTE.,Eight patients (31%) were treated with prophylactic anticoagulation, whereas 18 patients (69%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation.,The overall rate of VTE in patients was 69%.,The proportion of VTE was significantly higher in patients treated with prophylactic anticoagulation when compared with the other group (100% vs 56%, respectively, P = .03).,Surprisingly, we found a high rate of thromboembolic events in COVID‐19 patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation, with 56% of VTE and 6 pulmonary embolisms.,Our results suggest considering both systematic screening of VTE and early therapeutic anticoagulation in severe ICU COVID‐19 patients.

COVID-19 may predispose to both venous and arterial thromboembolism due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation and diffuse intravascular coagulation.,Reports on the incidence of thrombotic complications are however not available.,We evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or systemic arterial embolism in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital.,We studied 184 ICU patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia of whom 23 died (13%), 22 were discharged alive (12%) and 139 (76%) were still on the ICU on April 5th 2020.,All patients received at least standard doses thromboprophylaxis.,The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 31% (95%CI 20-41), of which CTPA and/or ultrasonography confirmed VTE in 27% (95%CI 17-37%) and arterial thrombotic events in 3.7% (95%CI 0-8.2%).,PE was the most frequent thrombotic complication (n = 25, 81%).,Age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.05/per year, 95%CI 1.004-1.01) and coagulopathy, defined as spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time > 3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time > 5 s (aHR 4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.1), were independent predictors of thrombotic complications.,The 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU patients with COVID-19 infections is remarkably high.,Our findings reinforce the recommendation to strictly apply pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, and are strongly suggestive of increasing the prophylaxis towards high-prophylactic doses, even in the absence of randomized evidence.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,High blood pressure (BP) is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.,While BP is regulated by the function of kidney, vasculature, and sympathetic nervous system, recent experimental data suggest that immune cells may play a role in hypertension.,We studied the relationship between major white blood cell types and blood pressure in the UK Biobank population and used Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using the ≈750 000 UK-Biobank/International Consortium of Blood Pressure-Genome-Wide Association Studies to examine which leukocyte populations may be causally linked to BP.,A positive association between quintiles of lymphocyte, monocyte, and neutrophil counts, and increased systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure was observed (eg, adjusted systolic BP mean±SE for 1st versus 5th quintile respectively: 140.13±0.08 versus 141.62±0.07 mm Hg for lymphocyte, 139.51±0.08 versus 141.84±0.07 mm Hg for monocyte, and 137.96±0.08 versus 142.71±0.07 mm Hg for neutrophil counts; all P<10-50).,Using 121 single nucleotide polymorphisms in MR, implemented through the inverse-variance weighted approach, we identified a potential causal relationship of lymphocyte count with systolic BP and diastolic BP (causal estimates: 0.69 [95% CI, 0.19-1.20] and 0.56 [95% CI, 0.23-0.90] of mm Hg per 1 SD genetically elevated lymphocyte count, respectively), which was directionally concordant to the observational findings.,These inverse-variance weighted estimates were consistent with other robust MR methods.,The exclusion of rs3184504 SNP in the SH2B3 locus attenuated the magnitude of the signal in some of the MR analyses.,MR in the reverse direction found evidence of positive effects of BP indices on counts of monocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils but not lymphocytes or basophils.,Subsequent MR testing of lymphocyte count in the context of genetic correlation with renal function or resting and postexercise heart rate demonstrated a positive association of lymphocyte count with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.,Observational and genetic analyses demonstrate a concordant, positive and potentially causal relationship of lymphocyte count with systolic BP and diastolic BP.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,The European Society of Cardiology recommends a 0/1-hour algorithm for rapid rule-out and rule-in of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) concentrations irrespective of renal function.,Because patients with renal dysfunction (RD) frequently present with increased hs-cTn concentrations even in the absence of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, concern has been raised regarding the performance of the 0/1-hour algorithm in RD.,In a prospective multicenter diagnostic study enrolling unselected patients presenting with suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to the emergency department, we assessed the diagnostic performance of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm using hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in patients with RD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and compared it to patients with normal renal function.,The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including cardiac imaging.,Safety was quantified as sensitivity in the rule-out zone, accuracy as the specificity in the rule-in zone, and efficacy as the proportion of the overall cohort assigned to either rule-out or rule-in based on the 0- and 1-hour sample.,Among 3254 patients, RD was present in 487 patients (15%).,The prevalence of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was substantially higher in patients with RD compared with patients with normal renal function (31% versus 13%, P<0.001).,Using hs-cTnT, patients with RD had comparable sensitivity of rule-out (100.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 97.6-100.0] versus 99.2% [95% CI, 97.6-99.8]; P=0.559), lower specificity of rule-in (88.7% [95% CI, 84.8-91.9] versus 96.5% [95% CI, 95.7-97.2]; P<0.001), and lower overall efficacy (51% versus 81%, P<0.001), mainly driven by a much lower percentage of patients eligible for rule-out (18% versus 68%, P<0.001) compared with patients with normal renal function.,Using hs-cTnI, patients with RD had comparable sensitivity of rule-out (98.6% [95% CI, 95.0-99.8] versus 98.5% [95% CI, 96.5-99.5]; P=1.0), lower specificity of rule-in (84.4% [95% CI, 79.9-88.3] versus 91.7% [95% CI, 90.5-92.9]; P<0.001), and lower overall efficacy (54% versus 76%, P<0.001; proportion ruled out, 18% versus 58%, P<0.001) compared with patients with normal renal function.,In patients with RD, the safety of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm is high, but specificity of rule-in and overall efficacy are decreased.,Modifications of the rule-in and rule-out thresholds did not improve the safety or overall efficacy of the 0/1-hour algorithm.,URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.,Unique identifier: NCT00470587.

There is concern about the potential of an increased risk related to medications that act on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), because the viral receptor is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).,We assessed the relation between previous treatment with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, or thiazide diuretics and the likelihood of a positive or negative result on Covid-19 testing as well as the likelihood of severe illness (defined as intensive care, mechanical ventilation, or death) among patients who tested positive.,Using Bayesian methods, we compared outcomes in patients who had been treated with these medications and in untreated patients, overall and in those with hypertension, after propensity-score matching for receipt of each medication class.,A difference of at least 10 percentage points was prespecified as a substantial difference.,Among 12,594 patients who were tested for Covid-19, a total of 5894 (46.8%) were positive; 1002 of these patients (17.0%) had severe illness.,A history of hypertension was present in 4357 patients (34.6%), among whom 2573 (59.1%) had a positive test; 634 of these patients (24.6%) had severe illness.,There was no association between any single medication class and an increased likelihood of a positive test.,None of the medications examined was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of severe illness among patients who tested positive.,We found no substantial increase in the likelihood of a positive test for Covid-19 or in the risk of severe Covid-19 among patients who tested positive in association with five common classes of antihypertensive medications.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infects host cells through ACE2 receptors, leading to coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related pneumonia, while also causing acute myocardial injury and chronic damage to the cardiovascular system.,Therefore, particular attention should be given to cardiovascular protection during treatment for COVID-19.

Lipid Phosphate phosphatase 3 (LPP3), encoded by the Plpp3 gene, is an enzyme that dephosphorylates the bioactive lipid mediator lysophosphatidic acid (LPA).,To study the role of LPP3 in the myocardium, we generated a cardiac specific Plpp3 deficient mouse strain.,Although these mice were viable at birth in contrast to global Plpp3 knockout mice, they showed increased mortality ~ 8 months.,LPP3 deficient mice had enlarged hearts with reduced left ventricular performance as seen by echocardiography.,Cardiac specific Plpp3 deficient mice had longer ventricular effective refractory periods compared to their Plpp3 littermates.,We observed that lack of Lpp3 enhanced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy based on analysis of cell surface area.,We found that lack of Lpp3 signaling was mediated through the activation of Rho and phospho-ERK pathways.,There are increased levels of fetal genes Natriuretic Peptide A and B (Nppa and Nppb) expression indicating myocardial dysfunction.,These mice also demonstrate mitochondrial dysfunction as evidenced by a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the basal oxygen consumption rate, mitochondrial ATP production, and spare respiratory capacity as measured through mitochondrial bioenergetics.,Histology and transmission electron microscopy of these hearts showed disrupted sarcomere organization and intercalated disc, with a prominent disruption of the cristae and vacuole formation in the mitochondria.,Our findings suggest that LPA/LPP3-signaling nexus plays an important role in normal function of cardiomyocytes.,fx1,•PLPP3 plays a prominent role in the heart compared to other isoforms of PLPP.,•Lack of PLPP3 results in deteriorating cardiac function.,•PLPP3 regulates LPA signaling in cardiomyocytes.,•Presence of PLPP3 is required for optimal mitochondrial function.,•Increased free radical production is mitigated with activated PLPP3.,PLPP3 plays a prominent role in the heart compared to other isoforms of PLPP.,Lack of PLPP3 results in deteriorating cardiac function.,PLPP3 regulates LPA signaling in cardiomyocytes.,Presence of PLPP3 is required for optimal mitochondrial function.,Increased free radical production is mitigated with activated PLPP3.

The dynamics of BBB permeability after AIS in humans are not well understood.,In the present study we measured the evolution of BBB permeability after AIS in humans using MRI.,Patients presenting to our institution with a diagnosis of AIS underwent a single dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) sequence to measure BBB permeability during their initial workup.,Forty-two patients were included in the final analysis.,The patient sample underwent DCE-MRI at a mean time of 23.8hrs after the onset of AIS symptoms (range: 1.3-90.7hrs).,At all time-points the BBB permeability within the infarct region of the brain as defined on DWI/ADC was higher compared to the homologous region of the contralateral hemisphere (p<0.005).,BBB permeability, expressed as a ratio of infarct permeability to contralateral permeability, was greatest at 6-48hrs after the onset of AIS.,Although the data was not acquired longitudinally, these findings suggest that the permeability of the BBB is continually elevated following AIS, which contradicts previous assertions that BBB permeability after AIS follows a biphasic course.,Knowledge of BBB dynamics following AIS may provide insight into future treatments for AIS, especially BBB stabilizing agents.

Three months ago, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) broke out in Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly around the world.,Severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) patients have abnormal blood coagulation function, but their venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevalence is still rarely mentioned.,To determine the incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP.,In this study, 81 severe NCP patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) were enrolled.,The results of conventional coagulation parameters and lower limb vein ultrasonography of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.,The incidence of VTE in these patients was 25% (20/81), of which 8 patients with VTE events died.,The VTE group was different from the non‐VTE group in age, lymphocyte counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D‐dimer, etc.,If 1.5 µg/mL was used as the D‐dimer cut‐off value to predicting VTE, the sensitivity was 85.0%, the specificity was 88.5%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 94.7%.,The incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP is 25% (20/81), which may be related to poor prognosis.,The significant increase of D‐dimer in severe NCP patients is a good index for identifying high‐risk groups of VTE.

Acute respiratory failure and a systemic coagulopathy are critical aspects of the morbidity and mortality characterizing infection with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome-associated coronavirus-2, the etiologic agent of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,We examined skin and lung tissues from 5 patients with severe COVID-19 characterized by respiratory failure (n= 5) and purpuric skin rash (n = 3).,COVID-19 pneumonitis was predominantly a pauci-inflammatory septal capillary injury with significant septal capillary mural and luminal fibrin deposition and permeation of the interalveolar septa by neutrophils.,No viral cytopathic changes were observed and the diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) with hyaline membranes, inflammation, and type II pneumocyte hyperplasia, hallmarks of classic acute respiratory distress syndrome, were not prominent.,These pulmonary findings were accompanied by significant deposits of terminal complement components C5b-9 (membrane attack complex), C4d, and mannose binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine protease (MASP)2, in the microvasculature, consistent with sustained, systemic activation of the complement pathways.,The purpuric skin lesions similarly showed a pauci-inflammatory thrombogenic vasculopathy, with deposition of C5b-9 and C4d in both grossly involved and normally-appearing skin.,In addition, there was co-localization of COVID-19 spike glycoproteins with C4d and C5b-9 in the interalveolar septa and the cutaneous microvasculature of 2 cases examined.,In conclusion, at least a subset of sustained, severe COVID-19 may define a type of catastrophic microvascular injury syndrome mediated by activation of complement pathways and an associated procoagulant state.,It provides a foundation for further exploration of the pathophysiologic importance of complement in COVID-19, and could suggest targets for specific intervention.

There has been significant controversy regarding the effects of pre‐hospitalization use of renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors on the prognosis of hypertensive COVID‐19 patients.,We retrospectively assessed 2,297 hospitalized COVID‐19 patients at Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China, from January 10th to March 30th, 2020; and identified 1,182 patients with known hypertension on pre‐hospitalization therapy.,We compared the baseline characteristics and in‐hospital mortality between hypertensive patients taking RAS inhibitors (N=355) versus non‐RAS inhibitors (N=827).,Of the 1,182 hypertensive patients (median age 68 years, 49.1% male), 12/355 (3.4%) patients died in the RAS inhibitors group vs.,95/827 (11.5%) patients in the non‐RAS inhibitors group (p<0.0001).,Adjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 0.28 (95% CI 0.15‐0.52, p<0.0001) at 45 days in the RAS inhibitors group compared with non‐RAS inhibitors group.,Similar findings were observed when patients taking angiotensin receptor blockers (N=289) or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (N=66) were separately compared with non‐RAS inhibitors group.,The RAS inhibitors group compared with non‐RAS inhibitors group had lower levels of C‐reactive protein (median 13.5 vs.,24.4 pg/mL; p=0.007) and interleukin‐6 (median 6.0 vs.,8.5 pg/mL; p=0.026) on admission.,The protective effect of RAS inhibitors on mortality was confirmed in a meta‐analysis of published data when our data were added to previous studies (odd ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.65, p<0.0001).,In a large single center retrospective analysis we observed a protective effect of pre‐hospitalization use of RAS inhibitors on mortality in hypertensive COVID‐19 patients; which might be associated with reduced inflammatory response.

Some studies of hospitalized patients suggested that the risk of death and/or severe illness due to COVID-19 is not associated with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin II receptor type 1 blockers (ARBs).,Nevertheless, some controversy still exists and there is limited information of the ACEIs/ARBs effect size on COVID-19 prognosis.,We aimed to measure the effect of ACEIs and/or ARBs on COVID-19 severe clinical illness by a meta-analysis.,Literature search included all studies published since the COVID-19 outbreak began (December 2019) until May 9, 2020.,We analyzed information from studies that included tested COVID-19 patients with arterial hypertension as comorbidity prior to hospital admission and history of taking ACEIs, ARBs, or ACEIs/ARBs.,We included 16 studies that involved 24,676 COVID-19 patients, and we compared patients with critical (n = 4134) vs. non-critical (n = 20,542) outcomes.,The overall assessment by estimating random effects shows that the use of ACEIs/ARBs is not associated with higher risk of in-hospital-death and/or severe illness among hypertensive patients with COVID-19 infection.,On the contrary, effect estimate shows an overall protective effect of RAAS inhibitors/blockers (ACEIs, ARBs, and/or ACEIs/ARBs) with ∼ 23 % reduced risk of death and/or critical disease (OR: 0.768, 95%CI: 0.651-0.907, p=0.0018).,The use of ACEIs (OR:0.652, 95%CI:0.478-0.891, p=0.0072) but not ACEIs/ARBs (OR:0.867, 95%CI:0.638-1.179, p =NS) or ARBs alone (OR:0.810, 95%CI:0.629-1.044, p=NS) may explain the overall protection displayed by RAAS intervention combined.,RAAS inhibitors might be associated with better COVID-19 prognosis.,Image, graphical abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a clinical syndrome caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Patients with severe disease show hyperactivation of the immune system, which can affect multiple organs besides the lungs.,Here, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a process known as immunothrombosis, in which activated neutrophils and monocytes interact with platelets and the coagulation cascade, leading to intravascular clot formation in small and larger vessels.,Microthrombotic complications may contribute to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other organ dysfunctions.,Therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing immunothrombosis may therefore be useful.,Several antithrombotic and immunomodulating drugs have been proposed as candidates to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.,The growing understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection pathogenesis and how it contributes to critical illness and its complications may help to improve risk stratification and develop targeted therapies to reduce the acute and long-term consequences of this disease.,Here, the authors propose that SARS-CoV-2 induces a prothrombotic state, with dysregulated immunothrombosis in lung microvessels and endothelial injury, which drive the clinical manifestations of severe COVID-19.,They discuss potential antithrombotic and immunomodulating drugs that are being considered in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

The core pathology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is infection of airway cells by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that results in excessive inflammation and respiratory disease, with cytokine storm and acute respiratory distress syndrome implicated in the most severe cases.,Thrombotic complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19.,Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease and/or traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and advanced age, are at the highest risk of death from COVID-19.,In this Review, we summarize new lines of evidence that point to both platelet and endothelial dysfunction as essential components of COVID-19 pathology and describe the mechanisms that might account for the contribution of cardiovascular risk factors to the most severe outcomes in COVID-19.,We highlight the distinct contributions of coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy to the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and discuss potential therapeutic strategies in the management of patients with COVD-19.,Harnessing the expertise of the biomedical and clinical communities is imperative to expand the available therapeutics beyond anticoagulants and to target both thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy.,Only with such collaborative efforts can we better prepare for further waves and for future coronavirus-related pandemics.,This Review summarizes the latest evidence indicating that platelet and endothelial dysfunction are essential components of COVID-19 pathology, describes the potential mechanisms underlying the contribution of cardiovascular risk factors to the most severe outcomes in COVID-19, and highlights the roles of coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy in COVID-19 pathogenesis.,Venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis and thrombotic microangiopathy substantially contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19.,A complex interaction between coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy contributes to COVID-19-associated thromboinflammation.Coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy are characteristic features associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, obesity and ageing.The combination of cardiovascular risk factors and infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to exacerbated thrombosis and increased mortality.Age has an important role in COVID-19 pathogenesis; young patients without a predisposition to coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy can have a distinct multisystem inflammatory syndrome that includes a Kawasaki disease-like syndrome in very young individuals.Combination therapies targeting inflammation, coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy are likely to be more successful than a single agent in tackling the COVID-19-associated thrombotic complications.,Venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis and thrombotic microangiopathy substantially contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19.,A complex interaction between coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy contributes to COVID-19-associated thromboinflammation.,Coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy are characteristic features associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, obesity and ageing.,The combination of cardiovascular risk factors and infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to exacerbated thrombosis and increased mortality.,Age has an important role in COVID-19 pathogenesis; young patients without a predisposition to coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy can have a distinct multisystem inflammatory syndrome that includes a Kawasaki disease-like syndrome in very young individuals.,Combination therapies targeting inflammation, coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy are likely to be more successful than a single agent in tackling the COVID-19-associated thrombotic complications.

The impact of atrial arrhythmias on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐associated outcomes are unclear.,We sought to identify prevalence, risk factors and outcomes associated with atrial arrhythmias among patients hospitalized with COVID‐19.,An observational cohort study of 1053 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection admitted to a quaternary care hospital and a community hospital was conducted.,Data from electrocardiographic and telemetry were collected to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter/tachycardia (AFL).,The association between atrial arrhythmias and 30‐day mortality was assessed with multivariable analysis.,Mean age of patients was 62 ± 17 years and 62% were men.,Atrial arrhythmias were identified in 166 (15.8%) patients, with AF in 154 (14.6%) patients and AFL in 40 (3.8%) patients.,Newly detected atrial arrhythmias occurred in 101 (9.6%) patients.,Age, male sex, prior AF, renal disease, and hypoxia on presentation were independently associated with AF/AFL occurrence.,Compared with patients without AF/AFL, patients with AF/AFL had significantly higher levels of troponin, B‐type natriuretic peptide, C‐reactive protein, ferritin and d‐dimer.,Mortality was significantly higher among patients with AF/AFL (39.2%) compared to patients without (13.4%; p < .001).,After adjustment for age and co‐morbidities, AF/AFL (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.93; p = .007) and newly detected AF/AFL (adjusted OR: 2.87; p < .001) were independently associated with 30‐day mortality.,Atrial arrhythmias are common among patients hospitalized with COVID‐19.,The presence of AF/AFL tracked with markers of inflammation and cardiac injury.,Atrial arrhythmias were independently associated with increased mortality.

A new type of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks recently in China and spreads into many other countries.,This disease, named as COVID-19, is similar to patients infected by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and nearly 20% of patients developed severe condition.,Cardiac injury is a prevalent complication of severe patients, exacerbating the disease severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.,Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the key host cellular receptor of SARS-CoV-2, has been identified in multiple organs, but its cellular distribution in human heart is not illuminated clearly.,This study performed the first state-of-art single cell atlas of adult human heart, and revealed that pericytes with high expression of ACE2 might act as the target cardiac cell of SARS-CoV-2.,The pericytes injury due to virus infection may result in capillary endothelial cells dysfunction, inducing microvascular dysfunction.,And patients with basic heart failure disease showed increased ACE2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, meaning that if infected by the virus these patients may have higher risk of heart attack and critically ill condition.,The finding of this study explains the high rate of severe cases among COVID-19 patients with basic cardiovascular disease; and these results also perhaps provide important reference to clinical treatment of cardiac injury among severe patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Infection by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has been reportedly associated with a high risk of thrombotic complications.,So far information is scarce and rapidly emerging.,We conducted a scoping review using a single engine search for studies assessing thrombosis and coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients.,Additional studies were identified by secondary review and alert services.,Studies reported the occurrence of venous thromboembolism and stroke in approximately 20% and 3% of patients, respectively.,A higher frequency seems to be present in severely ill patients, in particular those admitted to intensive care units.,The thrombotic risk is elevated despite the use of anticoagulant prophylaxis but optimal doses of anticoagulation are not yet defined.,Although an increase of biomarkers such as D-dimer has been consistently reported in severely ill COVID-19, the optimal cut-off level and prognostic value are not known.,A number of pressing issues were identified by this review, including defining the true incidence of VTE in COVID patients, developing algorithms to identify those susceptible to develop thrombotic complications and severe disease, determining the role of biomarkers and/or scoring systems to stratify patients' risk, designing adequate and feasible diagnostic protocols for PE, establishing the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy, and developing uniform diagnostic and reporting criteria.,•Thrombotic events, venous and arterial are frequent in COVID-19, more so in critically ill patients.,•Valid biomarkers to define risk and prognosis are still lacking.,•Anticoagulant prophylaxis is needed in all patients.,•The role of higher doses of anticoagulants in all patients is unclear.,•There is a need to develop standard clinical definitions, common data elements, and standard reporting criteria.,Thrombotic events, venous and arterial are frequent in COVID-19, more so in critically ill patients.,Valid biomarkers to define risk and prognosis are still lacking.,Anticoagulant prophylaxis is needed in all patients.,The role of higher doses of anticoagulants in all patients is unclear.,There is a need to develop standard clinical definitions, common data elements, and standard reporting criteria.

Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients.,Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.,All patients referred to 4 intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 between March 3rd and 31st 2020 were included.,Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected.,Propensity score matching was performed to analyze the occurrence of thromboembolic events between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients.,150 COVID-19 patients were included (122 men, median age 63 [53; 71] years, SAPSII 49 [37; 64] points).,Sixty-four clinically relevant thrombotic complications were diagnosed in 150 patients, mainly pulmonary embolisms (16.7%). 28/29 patients (96.6%) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy experienced circuit clotting.,Three thrombotic occlusions (in 2 patients) of centrifugal pump occurred in 12 patients (8%) supported by ECMO.,Most patients (> 95%) had elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen.,No patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation.,Von Willebrand (vWF) activity, vWF antigen and FVIII were considerably increased, and 50/57 tested patients (87.7%) had positive lupus anticoagulant.,Comparison with non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 145) confirmed that COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 77) developed significantly more thrombotic complications, mainly pulmonary embolisms (11.7 vs.,2.1%, p < 0.008).,Coagulation parameters significantly differed between the two groups.,Despite anticoagulation, a high number of patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 developed life-threatening thrombotic complications.,Higher anticoagulation targets than in usual critically ill patients should therefore probably be suggested.,The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06062-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A new type of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks recently in China and spreads into many other countries.,This disease, named as COVID-19, is similar to patients infected by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and nearly 20% of patients developed severe condition.,Cardiac injury is a prevalent complication of severe patients, exacerbating the disease severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.,Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the key host cellular receptor of SARS-CoV-2, has been identified in multiple organs, but its cellular distribution in human heart is not illuminated clearly.,This study performed the first state-of-art single cell atlas of adult human heart, and revealed that pericytes with high expression of ACE2 might act as the target cardiac cell of SARS-CoV-2.,The pericytes injury due to virus infection may result in capillary endothelial cells dysfunction, inducing microvascular dysfunction.,And patients with basic heart failure disease showed increased ACE2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, meaning that if infected by the virus these patients may have higher risk of heart attack and critically ill condition.,The finding of this study explains the high rate of severe cases among COVID-19 patients with basic cardiovascular disease; and these results also perhaps provide important reference to clinical treatment of cardiac injury among severe patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infects host cells through ACE2 receptors, leading to coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related pneumonia, while also causing acute myocardial injury and chronic damage to the cardiovascular system.,Therefore, particular attention should be given to cardiovascular protection during treatment for COVID-19.

The recent emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the ensuing global pandemic has presented a health emergency of unprecedented magnitude.,Recent clinical data has highlighted that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a significant risk of thrombotic complications ranging from microvascular thrombosis, venous thromboembolic disease, and stroke.,Importantly, thrombotic complications are markers of severe COVID-19 and are associated with multiorgan failure and increased mortality.,The evidence to date supports the concept that the thrombotic manifestations of severe COVID-19 are due to the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to invade endothelial cells via ACE-2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2), which is expressed on the endothelial cell surface.,However, in patients with COVID-19 the subsequent endothelial inflammation, complement activation, thrombin generation, platelet, and leukocyte recruitment, and the initiation of innate and adaptive immune responses culminate in immunothrombosis, ultimately causing (micro)thrombotic complications, such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and stroke.,Accordingly, the activation of coagulation (eg, as measured with plasma D-dimer) and thrombocytopenia have emerged as prognostic markers in COVID-19.,Given thrombotic complications are central determinants of the high mortality rate in COVID-19, strategies to prevent thrombosis are of critical importance.,Several antithrombotic drugs have been proposed as potential therapies to prevent COVID-19-associated thrombosis, including heparin, FXII inhibitors, fibrinolytic drugs, nafamostat, and dipyridamole, many of which also possess pleiotropic anti-inflammatory or antiviral effects.,The growing awareness and mechanistic understanding of the prothrombotic state of COVID-19 patients are driving efforts to more stringent diagnostic screening for thrombotic complications and to the early institution of antithrombotic drugs, for both the prevention and therapy of thrombotic complications.,The shifting paradigm of diagnostic and treatment strategies holds significant promise to reduce the burden of thrombotic complications and ultimately improve the prognosis for patients with COVID-19.

Coagulopathy in COVID-19 is a burning issue and strategies to prevent thromboembolic events are debated and highly heterogeneous.,The objective was to determine incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in COVID-19 inpatients receiving thromboprophylaxis.,In this retrospective French cohort study, patients hospitalized in medical wards non-ICU with confirmed COVID-19 and adequate thromboprophylaxis were included.,A systematic low limb venous duplex ultrasonography was performed at hospital discharge or earlier if deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was clinically suspected.,Chest angio-CT scan was performed when pulmonary embolism (PE) was suspected.,Of 71 patients, 16 developed VTE (22.5%) and 7 PE (10%) despite adequate thromboprophylaxis.,D-dimers at baseline were significantly higher in patients with DVT (p < 0.001).,Demographics, comorbidities, disease manifestations, severity score, and other biological parameters, including inflammatory markers, were similar in patients with and without VTE.,The negative predictive value of a baseline D-dimer level < 1.0 µg/ml was 90% for VTE and 98% for PE.,The positive predictive value for VTE was 44% and 67% for D-dimer level ≥ 1.0 µg/ml and ≥ 3 µg/ml, respectively.,The association between D-dimer level and VTE risk increased by taking into account the latest available D-dimer level prior to venous duplex ultrasonography for the patients with monitoring of D-dimer.,Despite thromboprophylaxis, the risk of VTE is high in COVID-19 non-ICU inpatients.,Increased D-dimer concentrations of more than 1.0 μg/ml predict the risk of venous thromboembolism.,D-dimer level-guided aggressive thromboprophylaxis regimens using higher doses of heparin should be evaluated in prospective studies.

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, represents the greatest medical challenge in decades.,We provide a comprehensive review of the clinical course of COVID-19, its comorbidities, and mechanistic considerations for future therapies.,While COVID-19 primarily affects the lungs, causing interstitial pneumonitis and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), it also affects multiple organs, particularly the cardiovascular system.,Risk of severe infection and mortality increase with advancing age and male sex.,Mortality is increased by comorbidities: cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, and cancer.,The most common complications include arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and ventricular fibrillation), cardiac injury [elevated highly sensitive troponin I (hs-cTnI) and creatine kinase (CK) levels], fulminant myocarditis, heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).,Mechanistically, SARS-CoV-2, following proteolytic cleavage of its S protein by a serine protease, binds to the transmembrane angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) -a homologue of ACE-to enter type 2 pneumocytes, macrophages, perivascular pericytes, and cardiomyocytes.,This may lead to myocardial dysfunction and damage, endothelial dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, plaque instability, and myocardial infarction (MI).,While ACE2 is essential for viral invasion, there is no evidence that ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) worsen prognosis.,Hence, patients should not discontinue their use.,Moreover, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors might be beneficial in COVID-19.,Initial immune and inflammatory responses induce a severe cytokine storm [interleukin (IL)-6, IL-7, IL-22, IL-17, etc.] during the rapid progression phase of COVID-19.,Early evaluation and continued monitoring of cardiac damage (cTnI and NT-proBNP) and coagulation (D-dimer) after hospitalization may identify patients with cardiac injury and predict COVID-19 complications.,Preventive measures (social distancing and social isolation) also increase cardiovascular risk.,Cardiovascular considerations of therapies currently used, including remdesivir, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, ribavirin, interferons, and lopinavir/ritonavir, as well as experimental therapies, such as human recombinant ACE2 (rhACE2), are discussed.

Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide.,While cardiac injury has been demonstrated in critically ill COVID-19 patients, the mechanism of injury remains unclear.,Here, we review our current knowledge of the biology of SARS-CoV-2 and the potential mechanisms of myocardial injury due to viral toxicities and host immune responses.,A number of studies have reported an epidemiological association between history of cardiac disease and worsened outcome during COVID infection.,Development of new onset myocardial injury during COVID-19 also increases mortality.,While limited data exist, potential mechanisms of cardiac injury include direct viral entry through the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and toxicity in host cells, hypoxia-related myocyte injury, and immune-mediated cytokine release syndrome.,Potential treatments for reducing viral infection and excessive immune responses are also discussed.,COVID patients with cardiac disease history or acquire new cardiac injury are at an increased risk for in-hospital morbidity and mortality.,More studies are needed to address the mechanism of cardiotoxicity and the treatments that can minimize permanent damage to the cardiovascular system.

Myocarditis is well known to be caused by viral infections such as Coxsackie virus group B, human herpes virus 6 and parvovirus B19.,However, during the current emerging outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, there have been few case reports describing myocarditis as a possible presentation.,In our case report we describe, early cardiac manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 in a UK District General Hospital.,A 44-year-old Caucasian woman without any comorbidities presented with SARS-CoV-2 related fulminant myocarditis without initial respiratory symptoms.,Patient underwent treatment with milrinone and methylprednisolone that showed reduction in myocardial inflammation and significantly improved myocardial contractility.,This was then followed by a second phase of SARS-CoV-2 associated pneumonia and renal failure requiring ventilatory support and haemofiltration.,Although, not described in the literature, we have found conjunctive use of milrinone and methylprednisolone effective in patient with SARS-CoV-2 fulminant myocarditis.

Fulminant (life-threatening) COVID-19 can be associated with acute respiratory failure (ARF), multi-system organ failure and cytokine release syndrome (CRS).,We present a rare case of fulminant COVID-19 associated with reverse-takotsubo-cardiomyopathy (RTCC) that improved with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE).,A 40 year old previous healthy male presented in the emergency room with 4 days of dry cough, chest pain, myalgias and fatigue.,He progressed to ARF requiring high-flow-nasal-cannula (flow: 60 L/minute, fraction of inspired oxygen: 40%).,Real-Time-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction (RT-PCR) assay confirmed COVID-19 and chest X-ray showed interstitial infiltrates.,Biochemistry suggested CRS: increased C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin and interleukin-6.,Renal function was normal but lactate levels were elevated.,Electrocardiogram demonstrated non-specific changes and troponin-I levels were slightly elevated.,Echocardiography revealed left ventricular (LV) basal and midventricular akinesia with apex sparing (LV ejection fraction: 30%) and depressed cardiac output (2.8 L/min) consistent with a rare variant of stress-related cardiomyopathy: RTCC.,His ratio of partial arterial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired concentration of oxygen was < 120.,He was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for mechanical ventilation and vasopressors, plus antivirals (lopinavir/ritonavir), and prophylactic anticoagulation.,Infusion of milrinone failed to improve his cardiogenic shock (day-1).,Thus, rescue TPE was performed using the Spectra Optia™ Apheresis System equipped with the Depuro D2000 Adsorption Cartridge (Terumo BCT Inc., USA) without protective antibodies.,Over 5 days he received daily TPE (each lasting 4 hours).,His lactate levels, oxygenation, and LV function normalized and he was weaned off vasopressors.,His inflammation markers improved, and he was extubated on day-7.,RT-PCR was negative on day-17.,He was discharged to home isolation in good condition.,Stress-cardiomyopathy may complicate the course of fulminant COVID-19 with associated CRS.,If inotropic therapy fails, TPE without protective antibodies may help rescue the critically ill patient.

Insulin resistance has been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs).,This study evaluated the association between the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, a novel surrogate indicator of insulin resistance, and the incidence of ASCVDs in people without ASCVDs at baseline by performing a meta-analysis.,Cohort studies reporting the multivariate-adjusted association between the TyG index and the incidence of ASCVDs were obtained by searching the PubMed and Embase databases.,A random-effects model incorporating intra-study heterogeneity was applied to combine the results.,Eight cohort studies comprising 5,731,294 participants were included in this meta-analysis.,The results showed that compared to those with the lowest TyG index category, participants with the highest TyG index category were independently associated with a higher risk of ASCVDs [hazard ratio (HR): 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-2.01, I2 = 80%, P < 0.001].,This finding was consistent with the meta-analysis results with the TyG index analyzed as a continuous variable (HR per 1-unit increment of the TyG index: 1.39, 95% CI 1.18-1.64, I2 = 89%, P < 0.001).,Subgroup analyses suggested that the age, sex, and diabetic status did not significantly affect the association (for subgroup analyses, all P > 0.05).,Moreover, participants with the highest TyG index category were independently associated with a higher risk of coronary artery disease [(CAD), HR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.47-2.58, I2 = 92%, P < 0.001] and stroke (HR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.23-1.29, I2 = 0%, P < 0.001).,A higher TyG index may be independently associated with a higher incidence of ASCVDs, CAD, and stroke in people without ASCVDs at baseline.

Da Silva et al. showed that the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index was positively associated with a higher prevalence of symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD).,TyG has been used in healthy individuals as a marker of insulin resistance.,The use of this index as a marker of atherosclerosis in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients might be influenced by diabetes and the hyperlipidemic state that led to CVD.,Certain considerations might be necessary before we conclude that the TyG index can be used as a marker of atherosclerosis in CVD patients.,These factors can highlight the role of fasting blood glucose and triglyceride levels that are used in the TyG formula.,Comparing the fasting blood glucose and/or triglyceride levels with the TyG index in these patients to show how much value the TyG index can add to clinical practice seems to be necessary.,Conclusions of such studies might be biased by these facts.,Stratification by CAD disease category cannot help achieve an understanding of the role of TyG in CVD.,Correlations do not imply causation, so the use of the TyG index as an index in CAD patients is questionable.

Recent studies have reported a high prevalence of thrombotic events in coronavirus disease 2019.,However, the significance of thromboembolic complications has not been widely appreciated.,The purpose of this review is to provide current knowledge of this serious problem.,Narrative review.,Online search of published medical literature through PubMed using the term “COVID-19,” “SARS,” “acute respiratory distress syndrome,” “coronavirus,” “coagulopathy,” “thrombus,” and “anticoagulants.”,Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to coagulopathy and thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019, and anticoagulant therapy.,Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.,Coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with a strikingly high prevalence of coagulopathy and venous thromboembolism that may contribute to respiratory deterioration.,Monitoring coagulation variables is important, as abnormal coagulation tests are related to adverse outcomes and may necessitate adjuvant antithrombotic interventions.,In the initial phase of the infection, d-dimer and fibrinogen levels are increased, while activated partial prothrombin time, prothrombin time, and platelet counts are often relatively normal.,Increased d-dimer levels three times the upper limit of normal may trigger screening for venous thromboembolism.,In all hospitalized patients, thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin is currently recommended.,The etiology of the procoagulant responses is complex and thought to be a result of specific interactions between host defense mechanisms and the coagulation system.,Although the coagulopathy is reminiscent of disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombotic microangiopathy, it has features that are markedly distinct from these entities.,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2/coronavirus disease 2019 frequently induces hypercoagulability with both microangiopathy and local thrombus formation, and a systemic coagulation defect that leads to large vessel thrombosis and major thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism in critically ill hospitalized patients. d-dimers and fibrinogen levels should be monitored, and all hospitalized patients should undergo thromboembolism prophylaxis with an increase in therapeutic anticoagulation in certain clinical situations.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly progressed to a global health emergency.,Respiratory illness is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients with the disease spectrum ranging from asymptomatic subclinical infection, to severe pneumonia progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome.,There is growing evidence describing pathophysiological resemblance of SARS-CoV-2 infection with other coronavirus infections such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV).,Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-2 receptors play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the virus.,Disruption of this receptor leads to cardiomyopathy, cardiac dysfunction, and heart failure.,Patients with cardiovascular disease are more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 and they are more likely to develop severe symptoms.,Hypertension, arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy and coronary heart disease are amongst major cardiovascular disease comorbidities seen in severe cases of COVID-19.,There is growing literature exploring cardiac involvement in SARS-CoV-2.,Myocardial injury is one of the important pathogenic features of COVID-19.,As a surrogate for myocardial injury, multiple studies have shown increased cardiac biomarkers mainly cardiac troponins I and T in the infected patients especially those with severe disease.,Myocarditis is depicted as another cause of morbidity amongst COVID-19 patients.,The exact mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 can cause myocardial injury are not clearly understood.,The proposed mechanisms of myocardial injury are direct damage to the cardiomyocytes, systemic inflammation, myocardial interstitial fibrosis, interferon mediated immune response, exaggerated cytokine response by Type 1 and 2 helper T cells, in addition to coronary plaque destabilization, and hypoxia.,Unlabelled Image

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral infection that can, in severe cases, result in cytokine storm, systemic inflammatory response and coagulopathy that is prognostic of poor outcomes.,While some, but not all, laboratory findings appear similar to sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), COVID-19- induced coagulopathy (CIC) appears to be more prothrombotic than hemorrhagic.,It has been postulated that CIC may be an uncontrolled immunothrombotic response to COVID-19, and there is growing evidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in these critically ill patients.,Clinicians around the globe are challenged with rapidly identifying reasonable diagnostic, monitoring and anticoagulant strategies to safely and effectively manage these patients.,Thoughtful use of proven, evidence-based approaches must be carefully balanced with integration of rapidly emerging evidence and growing experience.,The goal of this document is to provide guidance from the Anticoagulation Forum, a North American organization of anticoagulation providers, regarding use of anticoagulant therapies in patients with COVID-19.,We discuss in-hospital and post-discharge venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention, treatment of suspected but unconfirmed VTE, laboratory monitoring of COVID-19, associated anticoagulant therapies, and essential elements for optimized transitions of care specific to patients with COVID-19.

COVID-19 is also manifested with hypercoagulability, pulmonary intravascular coagulation, microangiopathy, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thrombosis.,Predisposing risk factors to severe COVID-19 are male sex, underlying cardiovascular disease, or cardiovascular risk factors including noncontrolled diabetes mellitus or arterial hypertension, obesity, and advanced age.,The VAS-European Independent Foundation in Angiology/Vascular Medicine draws attention to patients with vascular disease (VD) and presents an integral strategy for the management of patients with VD or cardiovascular risk factors (VD-CVR) and COVID-19.,VAS recommends (1) a COVID-19-oriented primary health care network for patients with VD-CVR for identification of patients with VD-CVR in the community and patients' education for disease symptoms, use of eHealth technology, adherence to the antithrombotic and vascular regulating treatments, and (2) close medical follow-up for efficacious control of VD progression and prompt application of physical and social distancing measures in case of new epidemic waves.,For patients with VD-CVR who receive home treatment for COVID-19, VAS recommends assessment for (1) disease worsening risk and prioritized hospitalization of those at high risk and (2) VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban, betrixaban, or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for those at high risk.,For hospitalized patients with VD-CVR and COVID-19, VAS recommends (1) routine thromboprophylaxis with weight-adjusted intermediate doses of LMWH (unless contraindication); (2) LMWH as the drug of choice over unfractionated heparin or direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of VTE or hypercoagulability; (3) careful evaluation of the risk for disease worsening and prompt application of targeted antiviral or convalescence treatments; (4) monitoring of D-dimer for optimization of the antithrombotic treatment; and (5) evaluation of the risk of VTE before hospital discharge using the IMPROVE-D-dimer score and prolonged post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban, betrixaban, or LMWH.

Coagulopathy is a common abnormality in patients with COVID‐19.,However, the exact incidence of venous thromboembolic event is unknown in anticoagulated, severe COVID‐19 patients.,Systematic assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) using complete duplex ultrasound (CDU) in anticoagulated COVID‐19 patients.,We performed a retrospective study in 2 French intensive care units (ICU) where CDU is performed as a standard of care.,A CDU from thigh to ankle at selected sites with Doppler waveforms and images was performed early during ICU stay in patients admitted with COVID‐19.,Anticoagulation dose was left to the discretion of the treating physician based on the individual risk of thrombosis.,Patients were classified as treated with prophylactic anticoagulation or therapeutic anticoagulation.,Pulmonary embolism was systematically searched in patients with persistent hypoxemia or secondary deterioration.,From March 19 to April 11, 2020, 26 consecutive patients with severe COVID‐19 were screened for VTE.,Eight patients (31%) were treated with prophylactic anticoagulation, whereas 18 patients (69%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation.,The overall rate of VTE in patients was 69%.,The proportion of VTE was significantly higher in patients treated with prophylactic anticoagulation when compared with the other group (100% vs 56%, respectively, P = .03).,Surprisingly, we found a high rate of thromboembolic events in COVID‐19 patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation, with 56% of VTE and 6 pulmonary embolisms.,Our results suggest considering both systematic screening of VTE and early therapeutic anticoagulation in severe ICU COVID‐19 patients.

The impact of atrial arrhythmias on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐associated outcomes are unclear.,We sought to identify prevalence, risk factors and outcomes associated with atrial arrhythmias among patients hospitalized with COVID‐19.,An observational cohort study of 1053 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection admitted to a quaternary care hospital and a community hospital was conducted.,Data from electrocardiographic and telemetry were collected to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter/tachycardia (AFL).,The association between atrial arrhythmias and 30‐day mortality was assessed with multivariable analysis.,Mean age of patients was 62 ± 17 years and 62% were men.,Atrial arrhythmias were identified in 166 (15.8%) patients, with AF in 154 (14.6%) patients and AFL in 40 (3.8%) patients.,Newly detected atrial arrhythmias occurred in 101 (9.6%) patients.,Age, male sex, prior AF, renal disease, and hypoxia on presentation were independently associated with AF/AFL occurrence.,Compared with patients without AF/AFL, patients with AF/AFL had significantly higher levels of troponin, B‐type natriuretic peptide, C‐reactive protein, ferritin and d‐dimer.,Mortality was significantly higher among patients with AF/AFL (39.2%) compared to patients without (13.4%; p < .001).,After adjustment for age and co‐morbidities, AF/AFL (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.93; p = .007) and newly detected AF/AFL (adjusted OR: 2.87; p < .001) were independently associated with 30‐day mortality.,Atrial arrhythmias are common among patients hospitalized with COVID‐19.,The presence of AF/AFL tracked with markers of inflammation and cardiac injury.,Atrial arrhythmias were independently associated with increased mortality.

The new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused more than 210 000 deaths worldwide.,However, little is known about the causes of death and the virus's pathologic features.,To validate and compare clinical findings with data from medical autopsy, virtual autopsy, and virologic tests.,Prospective cohort study.,Autopsies performed at a single academic medical center, as mandated by the German federal state of Hamburg for patients dying with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.,The first 12 consecutive COVID-19-positive deaths.,Complete autopsy, including postmortem computed tomography and histopathologic and virologic analysis, was performed.,Clinical data and medical course were evaluated.,Results: Median patient age was 73 years (range, 52 to 87 years), 75% of patients were male, and death occurred in the hospital (n = 10) or outpatient sector (n = 2).,Coronary heart disease and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the most common comorbid conditions (50% and 25%, respectively).,Autopsy revealed deep venous thrombosis in 7 of 12 patients (58%) in whom venous thromboembolism was not suspected before death; pulmonary embolism was the direct cause of death in 4 patients.,Postmortem computed tomography revealed reticular infiltration of the lungs with severe bilateral, dense consolidation, whereas histomorphologically diffuse alveolar damage was seen in 8 patients.,In all patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the lung at high concentrations; viremia in 6 of 10 and 5 of 12 patients demonstrated high viral RNA titers in the liver, kidney, or heart.,Limited sample size.,The high incidence of thromboembolic events suggests an important role of COVID-19-induced coagulopathy.,Further studies are needed to investigate the molecular mechanism and overall clinical incidence of COVID-19-related death, as well as possible therapeutic interventions to reduce it.,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.,Little is known of the pathologic changes that lead to death in patients with COVID-19.,This study reports the autopsy findings of consecutive patients who died with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Higher rates of strokes have been observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but data regarding the outcomes of COVID-19 patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) are lacking.,We report our initial experience in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with LVO in patients with COVID-19.,All consecutive patients with COVID-19 with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO treated in our institution during the 6 first weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak were included.,Baseline clinical and radiological findings, treatment, and short-term outcomes are reported.,We identified 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 treated for an acute ischemic stroke due to LVO.,Eight were men, with a median age of 59.5 years.,Seven had none or mild symptoms of COVID-19 at stroke onset.,Median time from COVID-19 symptoms to stroke onset was 6 days.,All patients had brain imaging within 3 hours from symptoms onset.,Five patients had multi-territory LVO.,Five received intravenous alteplase.,All patients had mechanical thrombectomy.,Nine patients achieved successful recanalization (mTICI2B-3), none experienced early neurological improvement, 4 had early cerebral reocclusion, and a total of 6 patients (60%) died in the hospital.,Best medical care including early intravenous thrombolysis, and successful and prompt recanalization achieved with mechanical thrombectomy, resulted in poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19.,Although our results require further confirmation, a different pharmacological approach (antiplatelet or other) should be investigated to take in account inflammatory and coagulation disorders associated with COVID-19.

COVID-19 may predispose to both venous and arterial thromboembolism due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation and diffuse intravascular coagulation.,Reports on the incidence of thrombotic complications are however not available.,We evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or systemic arterial embolism in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital.,We studied 184 ICU patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia of whom 23 died (13%), 22 were discharged alive (12%) and 139 (76%) were still on the ICU on April 5th 2020.,All patients received at least standard doses thromboprophylaxis.,The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 31% (95%CI 20-41), of which CTPA and/or ultrasonography confirmed VTE in 27% (95%CI 17-37%) and arterial thrombotic events in 3.7% (95%CI 0-8.2%).,PE was the most frequent thrombotic complication (n = 25, 81%).,Age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.05/per year, 95%CI 1.004-1.01) and coagulopathy, defined as spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time > 3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time > 5 s (aHR 4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.1), were independent predictors of thrombotic complications.,The 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU patients with COVID-19 infections is remarkably high.,Our findings reinforce the recommendation to strictly apply pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, and are strongly suggestive of increasing the prophylaxis towards high-prophylactic doses, even in the absence of randomized evidence.

COVID-19 is an infection induced by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, and severe forms can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management.,Severe forms are associated with coagulation changes, mainly characterized by an increase in D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, with a higher risk of thrombosis, particularly pulmonary embolism.,The impact of obesity in severe COVID-19 has also been highlighted.,In this context, standard doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may be inadequate in ICU patients, with obesity, major inflammation, and hypercoagulability.,We therefore urgently developed proposals on the prevention of thromboembolism and monitoring of hemostasis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.,Four levels of thromboembolic risk were defined according to the severity of COVID-19 reflected by oxygen requirement and treatment, the body mass index, and other risk factors.,Monitoring of hemostasis (including fibrinogen and D-dimer levels) every 48 h is proposed.,Standard doses of LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin 4000 IU/24 h SC) are proposed in case of intermediate thrombotic risk (BMI < 30 kg/m2, no other risk factors and no ARDS).,In all obese patients (high thrombotic risk), adjusted prophylaxis with intermediate doses of LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin 4000 IU/12 h SC or 6000 IU/12 h SC if weight > 120 kg), or unfractionated heparin (UFH) if renal insufficiency (200 IU/kg/24 h, IV), is proposed.,The thrombotic risk was defined as very high in obese patients with ARDS and added risk factors for thromboembolism, and also in case of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), unexplained catheter thrombosis, dialysis filter thrombosis, or marked inflammatory syndrome and/or hypercoagulability (e.g., fibrinogen > 8 g/l and/or D-dimers > 3 μg/ml).,In ICU patients, it is sometimes difficult to confirm a diagnosis of thrombosis, and curative anticoagulant treatment may also be discussed on a probabilistic basis.,In all these situations, therapeutic doses of LMWH, or UFH in case of renal insufficiency with monitoring of anti-Xa activity, are proposed.,In conclusion, intensification of heparin treatment should be considered in the context of COVID-19 on the basis of clinical and biological criteria of severity, especially in severely ill ventilated patients, for whom the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism cannot be easily confirmed.

Three months ago, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) broke out in Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly around the world.,Severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) patients have abnormal blood coagulation function, but their venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevalence is still rarely mentioned.,To determine the incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP.,In this study, 81 severe NCP patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) were enrolled.,The results of conventional coagulation parameters and lower limb vein ultrasonography of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.,The incidence of VTE in these patients was 25% (20/81), of which 8 patients with VTE events died.,The VTE group was different from the non‐VTE group in age, lymphocyte counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D‐dimer, etc.,If 1.5 µg/mL was used as the D‐dimer cut‐off value to predicting VTE, the sensitivity was 85.0%, the specificity was 88.5%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 94.7%.,The incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP is 25% (20/81), which may be related to poor prognosis.,The significant increase of D‐dimer in severe NCP patients is a good index for identifying high‐risk groups of VTE.

The new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused more than 210 000 deaths worldwide.,However, little is known about the causes of death and the virus's pathologic features.,To validate and compare clinical findings with data from medical autopsy, virtual autopsy, and virologic tests.,Prospective cohort study.,Autopsies performed at a single academic medical center, as mandated by the German federal state of Hamburg for patients dying with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.,The first 12 consecutive COVID-19-positive deaths.,Complete autopsy, including postmortem computed tomography and histopathologic and virologic analysis, was performed.,Clinical data and medical course were evaluated.,Results: Median patient age was 73 years (range, 52 to 87 years), 75% of patients were male, and death occurred in the hospital (n = 10) or outpatient sector (n = 2).,Coronary heart disease and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the most common comorbid conditions (50% and 25%, respectively).,Autopsy revealed deep venous thrombosis in 7 of 12 patients (58%) in whom venous thromboembolism was not suspected before death; pulmonary embolism was the direct cause of death in 4 patients.,Postmortem computed tomography revealed reticular infiltration of the lungs with severe bilateral, dense consolidation, whereas histomorphologically diffuse alveolar damage was seen in 8 patients.,In all patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the lung at high concentrations; viremia in 6 of 10 and 5 of 12 patients demonstrated high viral RNA titers in the liver, kidney, or heart.,Limited sample size.,The high incidence of thromboembolic events suggests an important role of COVID-19-induced coagulopathy.,Further studies are needed to investigate the molecular mechanism and overall clinical incidence of COVID-19-related death, as well as possible therapeutic interventions to reduce it.,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.,Little is known of the pathologic changes that lead to death in patients with COVID-19.,This study reports the autopsy findings of consecutive patients who died with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), a viral respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), may predispose patients to thrombotic disease, both in the venous and arterial circulations, because of excessive inflammation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis.,In addition, many patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic disease may develop COVID-19, which can have implications for choice, dosing, and laboratory monitoring of antithrombotic therapy.,Moreover, during a time with much focus on COVID-19, it is critical to consider how to optimize the available technology to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease.,Herein, the authors review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, epidemiology, management, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who develop venous or arterial thrombosis, of those with pre-existing thrombotic disease who develop COVID-19, or those who need prevention or care for their thrombotic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.,•COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,•Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,•Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,•The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.,COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.

Three months ago, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) broke out in Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly around the world.,Severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) patients have abnormal blood coagulation function, but their venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevalence is still rarely mentioned.,To determine the incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP.,In this study, 81 severe NCP patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) were enrolled.,The results of conventional coagulation parameters and lower limb vein ultrasonography of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.,The incidence of VTE in these patients was 25% (20/81), of which 8 patients with VTE events died.,The VTE group was different from the non‐VTE group in age, lymphocyte counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D‐dimer, etc.,If 1.5 µg/mL was used as the D‐dimer cut‐off value to predicting VTE, the sensitivity was 85.0%, the specificity was 88.5%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 94.7%.,The incidence of VTE in patients with severe NCP is 25% (20/81), which may be related to poor prognosis.,The significant increase of D‐dimer in severe NCP patients is a good index for identifying high‐risk groups of VTE.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), a viral respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), may predispose patients to thrombotic disease, both in the venous and arterial circulations, because of excessive inflammation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis.,In addition, many patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic disease may develop COVID-19, which can have implications for choice, dosing, and laboratory monitoring of antithrombotic therapy.,Moreover, during a time with much focus on COVID-19, it is critical to consider how to optimize the available technology to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease.,Herein, the authors review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, epidemiology, management, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who develop venous or arterial thrombosis, of those with pre-existing thrombotic disease who develop COVID-19, or those who need prevention or care for their thrombotic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.,•COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,•Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,•Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,•The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.,COVID-19 may predispose patients to arterial and venous thrombosis.,Initial series suggest the common occurrence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID-19.,The optimal preventive strategy warrants further investigation.,Drug-drug interactions between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with investigational COVID-19 therapies should be considered.,The available technology should be used optimally to care for patients without COVID-19 who have thrombotic disease during the pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), currently a worldwide pandemic, is a viral illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,The suspected contribution of thrombotic events to morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients has prompted a search for novel potential options for preventing COVID-19-associated thrombotic disease.,In this article by the Global COVID-19 Thrombosis Collaborative Group, we describe novel dosing approaches for commonly used antithrombotic agents (especially heparin-based regimens) and the potential use of less widely used antithrombotic drugs in the absence of confirmed thrombosis.,Although these therapies may have direct antithrombotic effects, other mechanisms of action, including anti-inflammatory or antiviral effects, have been postulated.,Based on survey results from this group of authors, we suggest research priorities for specific agents and subgroups of patients with COVID-19.,Further, we review other agents, including immunomodulators, that may have antithrombotic properties.,It is our hope that the present document will encourage and stimulate future prospective studies and randomized trials to study the safety, efficacy, and optimal use of these agents for prevention or management of thrombosis in COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), has rapidly evolved into a sweeping pandemic.,Its major manifestation is in the respiratory tract, and the general extent of organ involvement and the microscopic changes in the lungs remain insufficiently characterised.,Autopsies are essential to elucidate COVID‐19‐associated organ alterations.,This article reports the autopsy findings of 21 COVID‐19 patients hospitalised at the University Hospital Basel and at the Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Switzerland.,An in‐corpore technique was performed to ensure optimal staff safety.,The primary cause of death was respiratory failure with exudative diffuse alveolar damage and massive capillary congestion, often accompanied by microthrombi despite anticoagulation.,Ten cases showed superimposed bronchopneumonia.,Further findings included pulmonary embolism (n = 4), alveolar haemorrhage (n = 3), and vasculitis (n = 1).,Pathologies in other organ systems were predominantly attributable to shock; three patients showed signs of generalised and five of pulmonary thrombotic microangiopathy.,Six patients were diagnosed with senile cardiac amyloidosis upon autopsy.,Most patients suffered from one or more comorbidities (hypertension, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes mellitus).,Additionally, there was an overall predominance of males and individuals with blood group A (81% and 65%, respectively).,All relevant histological slides are linked as open‐source scans in supplementary files.,This study provides an overview of postmortem findings in COVID‐19 cases, implying that hypertensive, elderly, obese, male individuals with severe cardiovascular comorbidities as well as those with blood group A may have a lower threshold of tolerance for COVID‐19.,This provides a pathophysiological explanation for higher mortality rates among these patients.

What are the cardiovascular effects in unselected patients with recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?,In this cohort study including 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 identified from a COVID-19 test center, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), which was independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and the time from the original diagnosis.,These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.,This cohort study evaluates the presence of myocardial injury in unselected patients recently recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide.,Case reports of hospitalized patients suggest that COVID-19 prominently affects the cardiovascular system, but the overall impact remains unknown.,To evaluate the presence of myocardial injury in unselected patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness.,In this prospective observational cohort study, 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness were identified from the University Hospital Frankfurt COVID-19 Registry between April and June 2020.,Recent recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, as determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction on swab test of the upper respiratory tract.,Demographic characteristics, cardiac blood markers, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were obtained.,Comparisons were made with age-matched and sex-matched control groups of healthy volunteers (n = 50) and risk factor-matched patients (n = 57).,Of the 100 included patients, 53 (53%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 49 (14) years.,The median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR was 71 (64-92) days.,Of the 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19, 67 (67%) recovered at home, while 33 (33%) required hospitalization.,At the time of CMR, high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) was detectable (greater than 3 pg/mL) in 71 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (71%) and significantly elevated (greater than 13.9 pg/mL) in 5 patients (5%).,Compared with healthy controls and risk factor-matched controls, patients recently recovered from COVID-19 had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher left ventricle volumes, and raised native T1 and T2.,A total of 78 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (78%) had abnormal CMR findings, including raised myocardial native T1 (n = 73), raised myocardial native T2 (n = 60), myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (n = 32), or pericardial enhancement (n = 22).,There was a small but significant difference between patients who recovered at home vs in the hospital for native T1 mapping (median [IQR], 1119 [1092-1150] ms vs 1141 [1121-1175] ms; P = .008) and hsTnT (4.2 [3.0-5.9] pg/dL vs 6.3 [3.4-7.9] pg/dL; P = .002) but not for native T2 mapping.,None of these measures were correlated with time from COVID-19 diagnosis (native T1: r = 0.07; P = .47; native T2: r = 0.14; P = .15; hsTnT: r = −0.07; P = .50).,High-sensitivity troponin T was significantly correlated with native T1 mapping (r = 0.33; P < .001) and native T2 mapping (r = 0.18; P = .01).,Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with severe findings revealed active lymphocytic inflammation.,Native T1 and T2 were the measures with the best discriminatory ability to detect COVID-19-related myocardial pathology.,In this study of a cohort of German patients recently recovered from COVID-19 infection, CMR revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and time from the original diagnosis.,These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.

We recently reported a high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of three Dutch hospitals.,In answering questions raised regarding our study, we updated our database and repeated all analyses.,We re-evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and/or systemic arterial embolism in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICUs of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital from ICU admission to death, ICU discharge or April 22nd 2020, whichever came first.,We studied the same 184 ICU patients as reported on previously, of whom a total of 41 died (22%) and 78 were discharged alive (43%).,The median follow-up duration increased from 7 to 14 days.,All patients received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.,The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome, adjusted for competing risk of death, was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41-57%).,The majority of thrombotic events were PE (65/75; 87%).,In the competing risk model, chronic anticoagulation therapy at admission was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.29, 95%CI 0.091-0.92).,Patients diagnosed with thrombotic complications were at higher risk of all-cause death (HR 5.4; 95%CI 2.4-12).,Use of therapeutic anticoagulation was not associated with all-cause death (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.35-1.8).,In this updated analysis, we confirm the very high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

COVID-19 infection is commonly complicated with pro-thrombotic state and endothelial dysfunction.,While several studies reported a high incidence of venous thromboembolic events.,The occurrence of arterial thromboses are yet rarely described and could be underestimated.,To describe the clinical and biological characteristics of COVID-19 patients presenting with an associated arterial thromboembolic event.,We performed a retrospective multicentric study in 3 centers between France and Italy.,All patients with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and arterial thromboembolic events were included in the analysis.,From March 8th to April 25th 2020, we identified 20 patients (24 events) with arterial thromboembolic events over 209 admitted patients (9.6%) with severe COVID-19 infection.,Arterial thrombotic events included acute coronary occlusions (n = 9), stroke (n = 6), limb ischemia (n = 3), splenic infarcts (n = 3), aortic thrombosis (n = 2) and occlusive mesenteric ischemia (n = 1).,At the time of the event, 10/20 (50%) of patients received thromboprohylaxis, 2/20 (10%) were receiving treatment dose anticoagulation and 5/20 (25%) were receiving antiplatelet therapy.,Our observations suggest that serious arterial thrombotic events might occur in Covid-19 patients.,However, the exact incidence of such events and the best way to prevent them yet remains to be investigated.,•SARS-CoV-2 infection is commonly complicated with pro-thrombotic state and endothelial dysfunction.,•High rate of venous thromboembolic events have been described among patients suffering from Covid-19.,However, arterial thromboses are yet rarely described in this setting.,•We report a total of 20 cases of COVID-19 patients suffering from arterial thromboses.,•Our observations suggest that arterial thrombotic events might occur in Covid-19 patients and could be underestimated.,SARS-CoV-2 infection is commonly complicated with pro-thrombotic state and endothelial dysfunction.,High rate of venous thromboembolic events have been described among patients suffering from Covid-19.,However, arterial thromboses are yet rarely described in this setting.,We report a total of 20 cases of COVID-19 patients suffering from arterial thromboses.,Our observations suggest that arterial thrombotic events might occur in Covid-19 patients and could be underestimated.

Emerging evidence shows that severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be complicated by a significant coagulopathy, that likely manifests in the form of both microthrombosis and VTE.,This recognition has led to the urgent need for practical guidance regarding prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE.,A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format that addressed urgent clinical questions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in patients with COVID-19.,MEDLINE (via PubMed or Ovid), Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were systematically searched for relevant literature, and references were screened for inclusion.,Validated evaluation tools were used to grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation.,When evidence did not exist, guidance was developed based on consensus using the modified Delphi process.,The systematic review and critical analysis of the literature based on 13 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome questions resulted in 22 statements.,Very little evidence exists in the COVID-19 population.,The panel thus used expert consensus and existing evidence-based guidelines to craft the guidance statements.,The evidence on the optimal strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat VTE in patients with COVID-19 is sparse but rapidly evolving.

What are the cardiovascular effects in unselected patients with recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?,In this cohort study including 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 identified from a COVID-19 test center, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), which was independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and the time from the original diagnosis.,These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.,This cohort study evaluates the presence of myocardial injury in unselected patients recently recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide.,Case reports of hospitalized patients suggest that COVID-19 prominently affects the cardiovascular system, but the overall impact remains unknown.,To evaluate the presence of myocardial injury in unselected patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness.,In this prospective observational cohort study, 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness were identified from the University Hospital Frankfurt COVID-19 Registry between April and June 2020.,Recent recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, as determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction on swab test of the upper respiratory tract.,Demographic characteristics, cardiac blood markers, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were obtained.,Comparisons were made with age-matched and sex-matched control groups of healthy volunteers (n = 50) and risk factor-matched patients (n = 57).,Of the 100 included patients, 53 (53%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 49 (14) years.,The median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR was 71 (64-92) days.,Of the 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19, 67 (67%) recovered at home, while 33 (33%) required hospitalization.,At the time of CMR, high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) was detectable (greater than 3 pg/mL) in 71 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (71%) and significantly elevated (greater than 13.9 pg/mL) in 5 patients (5%).,Compared with healthy controls and risk factor-matched controls, patients recently recovered from COVID-19 had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher left ventricle volumes, and raised native T1 and T2.,A total of 78 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (78%) had abnormal CMR findings, including raised myocardial native T1 (n = 73), raised myocardial native T2 (n = 60), myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (n = 32), or pericardial enhancement (n = 22).,There was a small but significant difference between patients who recovered at home vs in the hospital for native T1 mapping (median [IQR], 1119 [1092-1150] ms vs 1141 [1121-1175] ms; P = .008) and hsTnT (4.2 [3.0-5.9] pg/dL vs 6.3 [3.4-7.9] pg/dL; P = .002) but not for native T2 mapping.,None of these measures were correlated with time from COVID-19 diagnosis (native T1: r = 0.07; P = .47; native T2: r = 0.14; P = .15; hsTnT: r = −0.07; P = .50).,High-sensitivity troponin T was significantly correlated with native T1 mapping (r = 0.33; P < .001) and native T2 mapping (r = 0.18; P = .01).,Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with severe findings revealed active lymphocytic inflammation.,Native T1 and T2 were the measures with the best discriminatory ability to detect COVID-19-related myocardial pathology.,In this study of a cohort of German patients recently recovered from COVID-19 infection, CMR revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and time from the original diagnosis.,These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.

Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described.,In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020.,Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors.,We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death.,191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients).,Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03-1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61-12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64-128·55; p=0·0033) on admission.,Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0-24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors.,The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.,The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.,Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

This study investigated continued and discontinued use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) during hospitalization of 614 hypertensive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients.,Demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory data, and ACEi/ARB usage were analyzed.,To account for confounders, patients were substratified by whether they developed hypotension and acute kidney injury (AKI) during the index hospitalization.,Mortality (22% vs 17%, P > .05) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (26% vs 12%, P > .05) rates were not significantly different between non-ACEi/ARB and ACEi/ARB groups.,However, patients who continued ACEi/ARBs in the hospital had a markedly lower ICU admission rate (12% vs 26%; P = .001; odds ratio [OR] = 0.347; 95% confidence interval [CI], .187-.643) and mortality rate (6% vs 28%; P = .001; OR = 0.215; 95% CI, .101-.455) compared to patients who discontinued ACEi/ARB.,The odds ratio for mortality remained significantly lower after accounting for development of hypotension or AKI.,These findings suggest that continued ACEi/ARB use in hypertensive COVID-19 patients yields better clinical outcomes.,In hypertensive patients with COVID-19, in-hospital continuation of ACE inhibitors or ARBs is associated with lower rates of mortality and intensive care admission in the absence of hypotension or acute kidney injury.

It remains unknown whether the treatment of hypertension influences the mortality of patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,This is a retrospective observational study of all patients admitted with COVID-19 to Huo Shen Shan Hospital.,The hospital was dedicated solely to the treatment of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.,Hypertension and the treatments were stratified according to the medical history or medications administrated prior to the infection.,Among 2877 hospitalized patients, 29.5% (850/2877) had a history of hypertension.,After adjustment for confounders, patients with hypertension had a two-fold increase in the relative risk of mortality as compared with patients without hypertension [4.0% vs.,1.1%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-3.82, P = 0.013].,Patients with a history of hypertension but without antihypertensive treatment (n = 140) were associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality compared with those with antihypertensive treatments (n = 730) (7.9% vs.,3.2%, adjusted HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.03-4.57, P = 0.041).,The mortality rates were similar between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor (4/183) and non-RAAS inhibitor (19/527) cohorts (2.2% vs.,3.6%, adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.28-2.58, P = 0.774).,However, in a study-level meta-analysis of four studies, the result showed that patients with RAAS inhibitor use tend to have a lower risk of mortality (relative risk 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.94, P = 0.20).,While hypertension and the discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment are suspected to be related to increased risk of mortality, in this retrospective observational analysis, we did not detect any harm of RAAS inhibitors in patients infected with COVID-19.,However, the results should be considered as exploratory and interpreted cautiously.