rhetoric_function
stringlengths 20
120
|
---|
Acknowledging limitation(s) whilst stating a finding or contribution |
Advising cautious interpretation of the findings |
Commenting on the findings |
Commenting on the strengths of the current study |
Comparing the result: contradicting previous findings |
Comparing the result: supporting previous findings |
Contrasting sources with ‘however’ for emphasis |
Describing previously used methods |
Describing questionnaire design |
Describing the characteristics of the participants |
Describing the limitations of the current study |
Describing the process: adverbs of manner |
Describing the process: expressing purpose with for |
Describing the process: infinitive of purpose |
Describing the process: sequence words |
Describing the process: statistical procedures |
Describing the process: typical verbs in the passive form |
Describing the process: using + instrument |
Describing the research design and the methods used |
Describing what other writers do in their published work |
Detailing specific limitations |
Establishing the importance of the topic for the discipline |
Establishing the importance of the topic for the discipline: time frame given |
Establishing the importance of the topic for the world or society |
Establishing the importance of the topic for the world or society: time frame given |
Establising the importance of the topic as a problem to be addressed |
Explaining keywords (also refer to Defining Terms) |
Explaining the provenance of articles for review |
Explaining the provenance of the participants |
Explaining the significance of the current study |
Explaining the significance of the findings or contribution of the study |
General comments on the relevant literature |
General reference to previous research or scholarship: highlighting negative outcomes |
Giving reasons for personal interest in the research (sometimes found in the humanities, and the applied human sciences) |
Giving reasons why a particular method was adopted |
Giving reasons why a particular method was rejected |
Highlighting inadequacies or weaknesses of previous studies (also refer to Being Critical) |
Highlighting interesting or surprising results |
Highlighting significant data in a table or chart |
Identifying a controversy within the field of study |
Identifying a knowledge gap in the field of study |
Implications and/or recommendations for practice or policy |
Indicating an expected outcome |
Indicating an unexpected outcome |
Indicating criteria for selection or inclusion in the study |
Indicating methodological problems or limitations |
Indicating missing, weak, or contradictory evidence |
Indicating the methodology for the current research |
Indicating the use of an established method |
Introducing the limitations of the current study |
Making recommendations for further research work |
Noting implications of the findings |
Noting the lack of or paucity of previous research |
Offering an explanation for the findings |
Outlining the structure of a short paper |
Outlining the structure of a thesis or dissertation |
Pointing out interesting or important findings |
Previewing a chapter |
Previous research: A historic perspective |
Previous research: Approaches taken |
Previous research: What has been established or proposed |
Previous research: area investigated as the sentence object |
Previous research: area investigated as the sentence subject |
Previous research: highlighting negative outcomes |
Providing background information: reference to the literature |
Providing background information: reference to the purpose of the study |
Reference to previous research: important studies |
Referring back to the purpose of the paper or study |
Referring back to the research aims or procedures |
Referring to a single investigation in the past: investigation prominent |
Referring to a single investigation in the past: researcher prominent |
Referring to another writer’s idea(s) or position |
Referring to data in a table or chart |
Referring to important texts in the area of interest |
Referring to previous work to establish what is already known |
Referring to secondary sources |
Referring to the literature to justify a method or approach |
Reporting positive and negative reactions |
Restating a result or one of several results |
Setting out the research questions or hypotheses |
Some ways of introducing quotations |
Stating a negative result |
Stating a positive result |
Stating purpose of the current research with reference to gaps or issues in the literature |
Stating the aims of the current research (note frequent use of past tense) |
Stating the focus, aim, or argument of a short paper |
Stating the purpose of the thesis, dissertation, or research article (note use of present tense) |
Stating what is currently known about the topic |
Suggesting general hypotheses |
Suggesting implications for what is already known |
Suggestions for future work |
Summarising the literature review |
Summarising the main research findings |
Summarising the results section |
Summarising the studies reviewed |
Surveys and interviews: Introducing excerpts from interview data |
Surveys and interviews: Reporting participants’ views |
Surveys and interviews: Reporting proportions |
Surveys and interviews: Reporting response rates |
Surveys and interviews: Reporting themes |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 22
Size of downloaded dataset files:
4.02 kB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
4.02 kB
Number of rows:
103