prompt
stringlengths
1
129
chosen
stringlengths
1
16.9k
rejected
stringlengths
1
16.4k
CPU and GPU trends over time
There are many architectural differences between CPUs and GPUs that make it difficult to draw the kinds of conclusions suggested by these graphs.Data parallel algorithms with high computation-to-communication ratios, good data locality and low local branch divergence will see these kinds of speedups when rewritten for GPUs. This is an important subset of algorithms, but don't expect GPUs to replace CPUs for more general-purpose computation any time soon.
Thanks for posting this, its an excellent insight.It was interesting when Intel fail to deliver on their roadmap. Here is a link from 2000 where Intel was alleged to be saying 10Ghz by 2011 http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/intel-predicts-10ghz-chip...Which of course lead to the great Multi-core debate (AMD started it, Intel followed with two physical die on a package later to integrate into a single die).Which lead to the great Memory channel bottleneck (Intel was in-order single channel, AMD was multi-channel) and resolution (everyone now is multi-channel).GPUs on the other hand have always had memory bandwidth issues so they went wide, the GPU equivalent of multi-channel, from the start. They also benefit from a feature of graphics which was 'do this same algorithm on all of these texels' which is straight forward to parallelize.And as nuclear weapons designers, and genomic researchers will tell you, GPUs are also useful in doing MIMD simulations.Its less clear what the parallel architecture breakthrough is for OLAP type problems (or parallel file systems as an even easier example) These have lots of operations in parallel but they also have high connectivity of data synchronicity across those parallel threads which, at the moment, brings everything down to earth.Fun times!
CPU and GPU trends over time
Thanks for posting this, its an excellent insight.It was interesting when Intel fail to deliver on their roadmap. Here is a link from 2000 where Intel was alleged to be saying 10Ghz by 2011 http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/intel-predicts-10ghz-chip...Which of course lead to the great Multi-core debate (AMD started it, Intel followed with two physical die on a package later to integrate into a single die).Which lead to the great Memory channel bottleneck (Intel was in-order single channel, AMD was multi-channel) and resolution (everyone now is multi-channel).GPUs on the other hand have always had memory bandwidth issues so they went wide, the GPU equivalent of multi-channel, from the start. They also benefit from a feature of graphics which was 'do this same algorithm on all of these texels' which is straight forward to parallelize.And as nuclear weapons designers, and genomic researchers will tell you, GPUs are also useful in doing MIMD simulations.Its less clear what the parallel architecture breakthrough is for OLAP type problems (or parallel file systems as an even easier example) These have lots of operations in parallel but they also have high connectivity of data synchronicity across those parallel threads which, at the moment, brings everything down to earth.Fun times!
I would have preferred a logarithmic scale for the last graph (http://csgillespie.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/gpu3.png).
CPU and GPU trends over time
I would have preferred a logarithmic scale for the last graph (http://csgillespie.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/gpu3.png).
If someone figured out how to write regular apps on a GPU (which would amount to parallelizing the app), it could change everything.1. What would be a first step towards this? It seems the big problem is that most code is sequential... and the opportunity is those parts that don't need to be, but just happen to be written that way.2. Perhaps another opportunity is to try to remove the layers that make modern software so slow. Can they be distributed across all pipelines somehow?3. Finally, a radical approach is not to try to convert existing apps, but to think about the whole problem of an app from the very beginning (what inputs will you get, what outputs do you want), and try to write that directly on a GPU. By making it concrete, you might see new tricks, perhaps by redefining the problem (the app's features).
CPU and GPU trends over time
If someone figured out how to write regular apps on a GPU (which would amount to parallelizing the app), it could change everything.1. What would be a first step towards this? It seems the big problem is that most code is sequential... and the opportunity is those parts that don't need to be, but just happen to be written that way.2. Perhaps another opportunity is to try to remove the layers that make modern software so slow. Can they be distributed across all pipelines somehow?3. Finally, a radical approach is not to try to convert existing apps, but to think about the whole problem of an app from the very beginning (what inputs will you get, what outputs do you want), and try to write that directly on a GPU. By making it concrete, you might see new tricks, perhaps by redefining the problem (the app's features).
If this chart from nVidia is to be believed, the CPU speed increase will continue for many years to come. They're projecting almost a 100x increase in speed from Tegra 2, in 2014! http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/SoC/NVIDIA/Kal-El/roadma...
Google's Humans.txt
I personally like the Disqus humans.txt file: http://disqus.com/humans.txtEdit: Also, I'm just getting a 404 on the linked Google humans.txt file.
It's not really practical to have a proper list of credits for a company like Google. I feel some people are going overboard with Google-bashing.
Google's Humans.txt
It's not really practical to have a proper list of credits for a company like Google. I feel some people are going overboard with Google-bashing.
went down for me, here's it in google cache:https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5FYB51...
Google's Humans.txt
went down for me, here's it in google cache:https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5FYB51...
Shouldn't the humans.txt mirror the robots.txt and give humans permission to use the website and explain how?
Google's Humans.txt
Shouldn't the humans.txt mirror the robots.txt and give humans permission to use the website and explain how?
Is this a weird marketing ploys to get geeks to look at their job postings?
How to Recruit a Frontend Hero
I don't think so. First of all, a Frontend Hero needs to have design sense, ability to learn quickly, empathy with users, trustworthiness to "fill in the blanks", and the balls to say no to designs or features that are unnecessary, impractical, and time-consuming. What Sebastian Deutsch described is a CSS / Javascript quirks specialist.Additionally, the article never really touched on how to recruit these people - it just lists screening questions to ask during an interview. To recruit a Frontend Hero, you need to hire great designers and create a culture that treats front end engineers as first class citizens.Incidentally, we're doing that at Airbnb right now. http://www.airbnb.com/jobs/show/8
Q: What methods do you know to realize columns? A: cleardiv clearfix (better one) WTF? I'd expect floats, faux columns, display: table-* , *-column-count being the answer but get some cleardiv/clearfix instead. I never liked those, especially cleardiv. Often you can do simply reusing next element (#footer {clear:both}), but sometimes that's not enough, alas.In my opinion any competent frontend developer should know these, not enough for the hero. On the other hand, to be able to interview hero you should be at least on that level yourself, which is not the case there, imho.
How to Recruit a Frontend Hero
Q: What methods do you know to realize columns? A: cleardiv clearfix (better one) WTF? I'd expect floats, faux columns, display: table-* , *-column-count being the answer but get some cleardiv/clearfix instead. I never liked those, especially cleardiv. Often you can do simply reusing next element (#footer {clear:both}), but sometimes that's not enough, alas.In my opinion any competent frontend developer should know these, not enough for the hero. On the other hand, to be able to interview hero you should be at least on that level yourself, which is not the case there, imho.
To me this looks like an endless series of 'gotcha' questions that for the most part are either in the totally obvious or terribly obscure category.
How to Recruit a Frontend Hero
To me this looks like an endless series of 'gotcha' questions that for the most part are either in the totally obvious or terribly obscure category.
That looks like a very poor checklist unless you're purely looking for someone that rapidly turns templates into markup.Otherwise, a grasp of how the users will interact with your app and what constraints that imposes on the front end is far more important than their ability to regurgitate CSS clearfix syntax and knowledge of server side javascript frameworks they might not have to learn.
How to Recruit a Frontend Hero
That looks like a very poor checklist unless you're purely looking for someone that rapidly turns templates into markup.Otherwise, a grasp of how the users will interact with your app and what constraints that imposes on the front end is far more important than their ability to regurgitate CSS clearfix syntax and knowledge of server side javascript frameworks they might not have to learn.
... wow, I haven't been paying close attention to the web development community. CSS frameworks are really considered an essential building block now?
Baby Name Predictor
Wow, my dad would have loved to come across a tool like this.My father, in his infinite genius, devised a clever naming scheme for his children (three of us), with the following rules:1. The middle name must be a fairly rare name, so that we might be the only one among friends/peers with the name, but not so unique or strange that we'd be ridiculed.I'm really grateful for this, and I consider the uniqueness (yet normalcy) of my name a huge gift. To this day I've only ever met one other Simon in person. (It's extremely rare in the US, but very popular in the UK I'm told).2. The first name must be fairly common, everyday name, named after someone in the family, as a fallback for us.Then, we were all to be called by our middle names. If we grew up detesting that name[1], we could easily switch to our first name as our primary je m'apelle and nobody in our future would think twice about it.John Nicholas was picked for my brother's first and middle as Nicholas was a "good Greek name" that almost nobody in America used. That was 1987. If you look at Nicholas in this tool you'll see just what happened to that name! (in the 1980's it shot up to over 1% of names and remained that way until after 2000).My dad was kind of bummed, and probably would have picked a different name if he had a bit of accessible clairvoyance. (Remember, pre-internet it was hard to even know that you could find this information out at all. I suspect the data he found in the 1980's, if any, was already years out of date)I'm the only child that didn't follow the rubric because Anthony Simon Sarris makes for a slightly offensive monogram, so my parents switched the order (to Simon Anthony Sarris) and I'm the only child called by his first name.[1] My little brother hated his middle name Morgan for most of his life (a girl's name too, some teasing, etc) so most of his friends call him by his first name. After high-school he appreciates both names.Aside- I do think our kind are more predisposed to obsess over names than most: "There are only two hard problems in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things." -- Phil Karlton
An interesting and entertaining study. I question the rigour of the prediction claims (they give a single example, though note that they disclaim that it isn't to be taken too seriously), especially given that naming patterns are dramatically changing.The top girl name accounts for about 1% of the gender now, where early in the 1900s it would account for 6%+.You can thank social media for that, and the effect is accelerating. Our awareness of trends nation and worldwide is much more amplified than it was before, and the forces that virally spread something also contribute to suppressing it lest we all look like fools. Add that multiculturalism and the acceptance of the same has greatly aided the entropy of names.I find geographic distribution and name variations far more interesting (though again, this is changing via social media).e.g.http://names.yafla.com/#n=Isabelle,Isabel,Isabell,Isabella&s...
Baby Name Predictor
An interesting and entertaining study. I question the rigour of the prediction claims (they give a single example, though note that they disclaim that it isn't to be taken too seriously), especially given that naming patterns are dramatically changing.The top girl name accounts for about 1% of the gender now, where early in the 1900s it would account for 6%+.You can thank social media for that, and the effect is accelerating. Our awareness of trends nation and worldwide is much more amplified than it was before, and the forces that virally spread something also contribute to suppressing it lest we all look like fools. Add that multiculturalism and the acceptance of the same has greatly aided the entropy of names.I find geographic distribution and name variations far more interesting (though again, this is changing via social media).e.g.http://names.yafla.com/#n=Isabelle,Isabel,Isabell,Isabella&s...
Geeky naming baby naming story time! My wife's Japanese, and I'm Finnish. To name our kids, I found databases of Finnish and Japanese names, cross-referenced them together (with fuzzy matching to account for spelling variance, so eg. l == r and Finnish j == Japanese y), and filtered out those that were opposite genders. In the end, there were precisely three male names left... and we used two!Crappy code on Github: https://github.com/jpatokal/baby_namesI was originally going to make this a public website, but encoding all the sound-vs-spelling rules is a pain and doing N-to-N fuzzy matching with raw SQL is too slow.
Baby Name Predictor
Geeky naming baby naming story time! My wife's Japanese, and I'm Finnish. To name our kids, I found databases of Finnish and Japanese names, cross-referenced them together (with fuzzy matching to account for spelling variance, so eg. l == r and Finnish j == Japanese y), and filtered out those that were opposite genders. In the end, there were precisely three male names left... and we used two!Crappy code on Github: https://github.com/jpatokal/baby_namesI was originally going to make this a public website, but encoding all the sound-vs-spelling rules is a pain and doing N-to-N fuzzy matching with raw SQL is too slow.
One lovely benefit of being an ethnic minority living outside the "motherland" is that you get a large pool of names to choose from that satisfy both the "only one in their 2nd grade class" and "venerable and meaningful" criteria.The downside is you'll be spelling out your name at Starbucks for the rest of your life and probably grow very tired of saying "No, emphasis on the first syllable, not the last" twice a week. But there are tradeoffs to everything.
Baby Name Predictor
One lovely benefit of being an ethnic minority living outside the "motherland" is that you get a large pool of names to choose from that satisfy both the "only one in their 2nd grade class" and "venerable and meaningful" criteria.The downside is you'll be spelling out your name at Starbucks for the rest of your life and probably grow very tired of saying "No, emphasis on the first syllable, not the last" twice a week. But there are tradeoffs to everything.
> Adolph last peaked in 1913 . It will next peak as a baby name in 2029.Well it's bound to come back someday I guess, 2029 is as good a time as any :)
Backbone.js views done right
Whoa there nellie. Complexity ahoy.Why would you want to have a view that dumps out its HTML as a string? If a string of HTML is all you want, don't use a view, just use a template.But putting that aside for a second ... for this particular example, how about this: render: -> this.$el.html JST["table_view_template"]() tbody = this.$el('tbody') for person in this.collection.models view = new TableRowView model: person tbody.append view.render().el ... or if you were in earnest about only needing the raw HTML from the sub-view, how about just rendering the row templates within the table template, making your render function as simple as this: render: -> this.$el.html this.template people: this.collection
How is the performance when each row gets its own object instantiated, its own template loaded, and its own events attached? What happens when you have 1000+ rows in a scrollable/sortable/filterable table? I tried nested views approach but the performance was lacking in slower PCs when the row count was high.What I prefer to do is the following: class Example.Views.TableView extends Backbone.View events: 'click td': 'clicked' rowHtml: -> x = [] p = $('#person_row').html() for person in @collection.models x.push(_.template(p, person)) x.join('') clicked: (e) -> id = $(e.target).parents('tr').attr('id') # handle action for row id render: -> # render self view including rowHTML The template is loaded just once into a variable and filled in each iteration. Only one set of events is attached to the DOM. Only one call is made to DOM to create all the rows, one string merged from HTML array. I still get the benefit of view and subview templates, without the constructor for subview objects being called 1000 times when all I need is the <tr> HTML x 1000.
Backbone.js views done right
How is the performance when each row gets its own object instantiated, its own template loaded, and its own events attached? What happens when you have 1000+ rows in a scrollable/sortable/filterable table? I tried nested views approach but the performance was lacking in slower PCs when the row count was high.What I prefer to do is the following: class Example.Views.TableView extends Backbone.View events: 'click td': 'clicked' rowHtml: -> x = [] p = $('#person_row').html() for person in @collection.models x.push(_.template(p, person)) x.join('') clicked: (e) -> id = $(e.target).parents('tr').attr('id') # handle action for row id render: -> # render self view including rowHTML The template is loaded just once into a variable and filled in each iteration. Only one set of events is attached to the DOM. Only one call is made to DOM to create all the rows, one string merged from HTML array. I still get the benefit of view and subview templates, without the constructor for subview objects being called 1000 times when all I need is the <tr> HTML x 1000.
This is getting way too many votes for what amounts to bad advice. I think you should keep subview rendering methods out of your templates (i.e. keep your templates "dumb"). You can just create placeholder elements in the template, and then pass the placeholder element to the subview constructor. Or you can just append a list of collection-based subviews to a single container element.You should be able to write Backbone apps without resorting to stuff like $("#row_#{@model.id}")And for an example, here's a gist https://gist.github.com/2931491
Backbone.js views done right
This is getting way too many votes for what amounts to bad advice. I think you should keep subview rendering methods out of your templates (i.e. keep your templates "dumb"). You can just create placeholder elements in the template, and then pass the placeholder element to the subview constructor. Or you can just append a list of collection-based subviews to a single container element.You should be able to write Backbone apps without resorting to stuff like $("#row_#{@model.id}")And for an example, here's a gist https://gist.github.com/2931491
Something I haven't been able to understand: why does almost every Backbone project generate and update views by applying templates to generate new HTML strings, and then new DOM fragments?Wouldn't it be much more efficient to create a view just once by setting innerHTML, and then update it using the DOM (setting attributes, classes, innerText, etc.)? Surely this would reduce GC pressure, reflow events, and so on.I'm seeing "use templates for everything" in most Backbone tutorials and projects, and I can't help but think that this is an anti-pattern.
Backbone.js views done right
Something I haven't been able to understand: why does almost every Backbone project generate and update views by applying templates to generate new HTML strings, and then new DOM fragments?Wouldn't it be much more efficient to create a view just once by setting innerHTML, and then update it using the DOM (setting attributes, classes, innerText, etc.)? Surely this would reduce GC pressure, reflow events, and so on.I'm seeing "use templates for everything" in most Backbone tutorials and projects, and I can't help but think that this is an anti-pattern.
A lot of people are finding out that views are the hardest thing to do - especially with Backbone. The problem is that views are tightly coupled to the model so it's hard to build them up. I just wrote http://modernjavascript.blogspot.com/2012/06/v-in-mvc.html for another post but believe that it could be helpful in this situation. You'd need to actually write a Backbone.controller class and move the logic in to there but then you could create a whole lot of Backbone.Views that were generic and could be hooked up through the Control (I'd also like to see a Backbone.MultiView or something that could take several views in and then re-emit the changes and allow people to add in several small component views in to a large view either for a collection or a model.
3 days before elections, largest German state censors Pirate Party from the net
this headline is misleading. The website was blocked in some schools due to an incompetent configuration of a filter software. The filter configuration has been changed.
This ought to be counter-productive, considering that most students either know or potentially know about the Pirate Party. All this does is making people who didn't care enough become interested. I think the Pirate Party will probably get more votes from this, as people like to feel they are sticking up to the man - voting on a censored and a non-non-sensical party seems like a good way of doing it, especially since their views are aligned with most students views.
3 days before elections, largest German state censors Pirate Party from the net
This ought to be counter-productive, considering that most students either know or potentially know about the Pirate Party. All this does is making people who didn't care enough become interested. I think the Pirate Party will probably get more votes from this, as people like to feel they are sticking up to the man - voting on a censored and a non-non-sensical party seems like a good way of doing it, especially since their views are aligned with most students views.
This isn't censorship any more than blocking porn in high school libraries is considered censorship. This wasn't a move by rival political parties. The school in question used some third party web filter which flagged the pirate party's website as drug-related.
3 days before elections, largest German state censors Pirate Party from the net
This isn't censorship any more than blocking porn in high school libraries is considered censorship. This wasn't a move by rival political parties. The school in question used some third party web filter which flagged the pirate party's website as drug-related.
There is a possibility of censorship of the Dutch party since yesterday.Dutch court bans Pirate Party links to The Pirate Bay http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18016819
3 days before elections, largest German state censors Pirate Party from the net
There is a possibility of censorship of the Dutch party since yesterday.Dutch court bans Pirate Party links to The Pirate Bay http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18016819
What "list from IBM" would they be using? Can anyone confirm this categorization of the site as "illegal drugs"?Edit: any chance this was done by someone in support of the pirate party?
Ask HN: What do you while the automated tests are running?
My guess is that you're testing AR associations all over the place and that the business logic in your models is tightly coupled to AR associations. This has the effect of slowing down testing tremendously.I try to write code so that stuff that needs to be tested is not tied to AR. Why should your logic need to wait for AR to fetch records and fire a callback when the part that is likely to break (that isn't covered by AR's test suite) is your logic, not the data fetching or callback infrastructure.
We dont run the entire test suit. Our last night test suit took 159 minutes to finish.We automated that in order to run every night. We need a 100% pass rate before we push to production.If you just do something you run those specific tests. If something else breaks due to that, it will be caught ( hopefully ) by the nightly tests.Imagine having to run the test suite 2 - 3 times a day. Your day would be wasted !
Ask HN: What do you while the automated tests are running?
We dont run the entire test suit. Our last night test suit took 159 minutes to finish.We automated that in order to run every night. We need a 100% pass rate before we push to production.If you just do something you run those specific tests. If something else breaks due to that, it will be caught ( hopefully ) by the nightly tests.Imagine having to run the test suite 2 - 3 times a day. Your day would be wasted !
I use my Ansible runs (which are much shorter, but still take a huge chunk of the day in agregate) to update my todos and timesheets, doodle ideas... and also to check email and HN. So it goes.Of course, my Ansible runs are shorter because I try not to do the full run every time.
Ask HN: What do you while the automated tests are running?
I use my Ansible runs (which are much shorter, but still take a huge chunk of the day in agregate) to update my todos and timesheets, doodle ideas... and also to check email and HN. So it goes.Of course, my Ansible runs are shorter because I try not to do the full run every time.
Actually relevant xkcd: http://xkcd.com/303/
Ask HN: What do you while the automated tests are running?
Actually relevant xkcd: http://xkcd.com/303/
I start planning my work for the next few hours, scratching down notes / sketching out an algorithm / design a screen / update my todo list . Although I have never had to wait more than 5 minutes for tests to run.
JavaScript Promises: There and back again
Broader adoption of JS on the server will only begin after ES6 generators land in Node. Due to the complexity of async code, writing JS on the server is not easy for the average team.As of now, you could use Promises but it is still kind of messy without generators. Here is a simple example: #Without generators Credentials.get({ token }) .then (credentials) => User.get({ username: credentials.username }) #With generators credentials = yield Credentials.get({ token }) User.get({ username: credentials.username }) We use FaceBook's regenerator project to compile ES6 features down to Node's currently supported Javascript features. If you don't want to use the --harmony flag, you should really try it out. https://github.com/facebook/regenerator
I recently found that AngularJS has supports for promises. I replaced some of the callback code to use promises and it's a lot more readable.Callbacks: Backend.CallA(param, function() { aDone = true; if (aDone && bDone) { doC(); } }); Backend.CallB(param, function() { bDone = true; if (aDone && bDone) { doC(); } }); Promises: var promiseA = Backend.CallA(param); var promiseB = Backend.CallB(param); $q.all([promiseA, promiseB]).then(doC);
JavaScript Promises: There and back again
I recently found that AngularJS has supports for promises. I replaced some of the callback code to use promises and it's a lot more readable.Callbacks: Backend.CallA(param, function() { aDone = true; if (aDone && bDone) { doC(); } }); Backend.CallB(param, function() { bDone = true; if (aDone && bDone) { doC(); } }); Promises: var promiseA = Backend.CallA(param); var promiseB = Backend.CallB(param); $q.all([promiseA, promiseB]).then(doC);
What version of Javascript has Promises and does anyone know the estimated time it might take to make it over to V8 and subsequently node.js?The biggest issue I had with promises is interfacing with non-promise code. There are methods to 'lift' node.js code that uses callbacks into promises, but the resulting code is much noiser.I'm a bit disappointed that the official JS version didn't cut down on the visual noise of the piping so the actual work being done stands out. Maybe there needs to be a different type of syntax highlighter that mutes the promises piping and highlights the actual calls.
JavaScript Promises: There and back again
What version of Javascript has Promises and does anyone know the estimated time it might take to make it over to V8 and subsequently node.js?The biggest issue I had with promises is interfacing with non-promise code. There are methods to 'lift' node.js code that uses callbacks into promises, but the resulting code is much noiser.I'm a bit disappointed that the official JS version didn't cut down on the visual noise of the piping so the actual work being done stands out. Maybe there needs to be a different type of syntax highlighter that mutes the promises piping and highlights the actual calls.
I've been really enjoying ToffeeScript, which provides implicit continuations. It was trivial to implement coroutines on top of it: https://gist.github.com/luciangames/7776345.It works very well if you bear in mind what's happening to the call stack. In my case, every call to pause! or wait! is scheduling a continuation to be called later by the game loop. If I'm not mistaken, the overhead of each continuation is just that of a closure.It's very comfortable, coming from a background in Stackless Python, Lua, and Unity.I wish more people would take a look at ToffeeScript.
JavaScript Promises: There and back again
I've been really enjoying ToffeeScript, which provides implicit continuations. It was trivial to implement coroutines on top of it: https://gist.github.com/luciangames/7776345.It works very well if you bear in mind what's happening to the call stack. In my case, every call to pause! or wait! is scheduling a continuation to be called later by the game loop. If I'm not mistaken, the overhead of each continuation is just that of a closure.It's very comfortable, coming from a background in Stackless Python, Lua, and Unity.I wish more people would take a look at ToffeeScript.
Fantastic! I don't know if promises are the ultimate solution to async programming, but they're a hell of a lot better than plain old callbacks.
Mercurial 2.0 has added largefiles extension (older r. are downloaded on demand)
I'm the developer of [git-annex](http://git-annex.branchable.com/) which is AFAIK the closest eqivalant for git. I only learned about the mercurial bfiles extension (which became the large files extension) after designing git-annex.The designs are obviously similar at a high level, but one important difference is that git-annex tracks, in a fully distributed manner, which git repositories currently contain the content of a particular large file. The mercurial extension is, AFAIK, rather more centralized; while it can transfer large file content from multiple stores it can't, for example, transfer a large file from a nearby client that happens to currently have a copy, which git-annex can do (if a remote is set up). This location tracking also allows me to have offline archival disks whose content is tracked with git-annex. If I ask for an archived file, git-annex knows which disks I can put online to retrieve it.Another difference is that the mercurial extension always makes available all the large files for the currently checked out tree. git-annex allows a tree to be checked out with large files not present (they appear as broken symlinks); you can ask it to populate the tree and it retrieves the files as a separate step. This is both more complex and more flexible. For example, I have a git repository containing a few terabytes of data. It's checked out on my laptop's 30 gb SSD. Only the files I'm currently using are present on my laptop, but I can still manage all the other files, reorganizing them, requesting ones I need, etc.git-annex also has support for special remotes, which are not git repositories, but in which large files are stored. So large files can be stored in Amazon S3 (or the Internet Archive S3), in a bup repository, or downloaded from arbitrary urls on the web.Content in special remotes are tracked the same as other remotes. This lets me do things like this (the first file is one of my Grandfather's engineering drawings of Panama Canal locks): joey@gnu:~/lib/big/raw/eckberg_panama>git annex whereis img-0124.png whereis img-0124.png (5 copies) 5863d8c0-d9a9-11df-adb2-af51e6559a49 -- turtle (turtle internal drive) 7e55d8d0-81ab-11e0-acc9-bfb671110037 -- archive-panama (internet archive http://www.archive.org/details/panama-canal-lock-design-papers) 905a3a64-4149-11e0-8b3f-97b9501cdcd3 -- passport (passport usb drive 1 terabyte) 9b22e786-dff4-11df-8b4c-731a6178061c -- archive-leech (archive-6 sata drive) f4c185e2-da3e-11df-a198-e70f2c123f40 -- archive (archive-5 sata drive) ok joey@gnu:~/lib/big/raw/eckberg_panama>git annex get img-0124.png --from archive-panama get img-0124.png (from archive-panama...) ok I'm hopeful that git will grow some internal hooks for managing large files that will improve git-annex and also allow others to develop extensions that, perhaps, behave more like the mercurial largefiles extension. I recently attended the GitTogether and this stuff was a major topic of discussion.
Another option available since Mercurial 1.5 is to put the large files in a subversion repository and reference it as a subrepository.http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepository#SVN_subrepos...
Mercurial 2.0 has added largefiles extension (older r. are downloaded on demand)
Another option available since Mercurial 1.5 is to put the large files in a subversion repository and reference it as a subrepository.http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepository#SVN_subrepos...
I don't get what it does. Does this extension make large binary files "diffable," as it states that's the problem it solves?
Mercurial 2.0 has added largefiles extension (older r. are downloaded on demand)
I don't get what it does. Does this extension make large binary files "diffable," as it states that's the problem it solves?
I wonder whether Kiln will end up using this.
Mercurial 2.0 has added largefiles extension (older r. are downloaded on demand)
I wonder whether Kiln will end up using this.
This could actually give Mercurial a big edge over Git for development environments where large binary files are a core part of your workflow - like game development. Products like Perforce are a big hit in games precisely because they are really good at handling this specific class of file.It's a shame, because I hate using Mercurial, but this would give me a very strong reason to use it for my game projects instead of Git.
Ask HN: Anybody working on opensource web app
I have 2 Rails apps you might be interested in.Big Help is our company's help ticket system. I'd like to get it up to Rails 3 and prettied up. Also would like to implement macros/canned responses and allow them to be inserted via jQuery. http://github.com/bigfolio/big-helpSubby is a starting point for a subscription based web-app that uses subdomain-based accounts and Chargify for billing. It could use some layout/CSS love.http://github.com/bigfolio/Subby
I could really use some help with http://freeciv.net, if you want to participate in an open source web game. Please get in touch if you are interested!
Ask HN: Anybody working on opensource web app
I could really use some help with http://freeciv.net, if you want to participate in an open source web game. Please get in touch if you are interested!
This is my crazy dream: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AcmB_WI1jRkCZG41c2d4cl80OT...
Ask HN: Anybody working on opensource web app
This is my crazy dream: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AcmB_WI1jRkCZG41c2d4cl80OT...
Mezzanine is a CMS platform built with Django, BSD licensed:http://mezzanine.jupo.orgA few days ago I blogged about all the different roles it's lacking in, UX is one:http://blog.jupo.org/post/845040660/an-open-source-brief
Ask HN: Anybody working on opensource web app
Mezzanine is a CMS platform built with Django, BSD licensed:http://mezzanine.jupo.orgA few days ago I blogged about all the different roles it's lacking in, UX is one:http://blog.jupo.org/post/845040660/an-open-source-brief
Mifos is web-based banking software for microloans - we're a Grameen Foundation project working to end world poverty.We can use help making our user interface better!http://www.mifos.org/And to volunteer:http://www.mifos.org/developers
Ooc: new awesome language with site redesign, guide, and screencast
I'm in language overload at this point. Much more than another language I'd like to see some creative new architectural approaches to problems that are thorny or tedious to solve right now.I mean, if something as simple as applying MVC principles to web development can create a revolution there have to be a lot of other unplucked ideas out there. Software engineering feels a lot like architecture would if people spent 95% of their time talking about materials.
I've been following Ooc for a long time, mostly because I liked the syntax. It's a weird blend of C and Ruby.nddrylliog, I think you should make the "jump to" navigation easier to find in the intro guide.
Ooc: new awesome language with site redesign, guide, and screencast
I've been following Ooc for a long time, mostly because I liked the syntax. It's a weird blend of C and Ruby.nddrylliog, I think you should make the "jump to" navigation easier to find in the intro guide.
Not to crap on the parade or anything but new languages are a dime a dozen and most all offer the same exact paradigms rehashed over and over and over. What I want is a low level easy to verify OOP/chaining functional concurrent language based on term rewriting. Something needs to be done to allow easier proving of programs with a language that is designed for this. I'm working on one.
Ooc: new awesome language with site redesign, guide, and screencast
Not to crap on the parade or anything but new languages are a dime a dozen and most all offer the same exact paradigms rehashed over and over and over. What I want is a low level easy to verify OOP/chaining functional concurrent language based on term rewriting. Something needs to be done to allow easier proving of programs with a language that is designed for this. I'm working on one.
> curl: bash -c "`curl -L http://ooc-lang.org/install.sh`Extra points for this awesome install process. I wish more projects would make a seamless newbie experience higher-priority.
Ooc: new awesome language with site redesign, guide, and screencast
> curl: bash -c "`curl -L http://ooc-lang.org/install.sh`Extra points for this awesome install process. I wish more projects would make a seamless newbie experience higher-priority.
Why not LLVM? Some language compiling to C99 seems kind of outdated since we have LLVM. (And if C99 is really wanted, LLVM can output that too. Whereby nobody really is keeping that up-to-date because noone really is interested in it.)
Dr. Eric Schmidt Resigns from Apple’s Board of Directors
A little OT.But I think it is really, really cool that a very technical person is acknowledged to be a capable CEO. Many companies still consider technical people incapable to be leaders (just by definition). Agree some techies may not have the desire or the social skills to lead but not all techies are like that.
Fake Steve Jobs must be ready to explode right around now.
Dr. Eric Schmidt Resigns from Apple’s Board of Directors
Fake Steve Jobs must be ready to explode right around now.
I wonder if the GV thing was a result of internal politics with the aim being to force Schmidt to resign. I mean it seemed a bit too heavy handed even for Apple. Either way he had to go.Hopefully this will mean it's 'game on' for full competition in the mobile space.
Dr. Eric Schmidt Resigns from Apple’s Board of Directors
I wonder if the GV thing was a result of internal politics with the aim being to force Schmidt to resign. I mean it seemed a bit too heavy handed even for Apple. Either way he had to go.Hopefully this will mean it's 'game on' for full competition in the mobile space.
What took them so long?
Dr. Eric Schmidt Resigns from Apple’s Board of Directors
What took them so long?
Now tell me that this has nothing to do with the recent events (the Google Voice removal from the App Store).
Alpha male programmers aren't keeping women out
I'm not sure who is making this argument anyway. Women are naturally attracted to alpha males.I think the truth is quite the opposite. Programming and IT have historically attracted a large number of social rejects, who, despite scoring high on self-evaluated liberalness, have no idea how to talk to women. Whether the individual problem is general awkwardness, sexist beliefs, bitterness towards women, or inability to engage with women or fawning all over them, if half the guys in an IT department have one of these problems then it's going to be a very unwelcoming place to be for a woman.I remember in my undergrad that the ratio of men to women in CS classes created a problem in and of itself as any remotely attractive woman had to fight off all kinds of unwanted attention from a steady stream of unattractive guys. To me it's no surprise that by senior year they had dwindled to a handful.
Now that doesn't mean the underlying problem isn't worth dealing with. It absolutely is! I think that the world of programming could be much more interesting if more women were part of it. I wish I knew how to make that happen. If I find out, I'll be the first to champion it.This may get me a ton of down-votes, but I'm genuinely curious: is the gender gap in programming actually a problem? If so, why? In what ways would the world of programming be more interesting if it was more evenly split between men and women?I'm not trying to sound misogynistic or anything, just haven't thought much about this topic and I'm not sure I understand why it's considered a big problem. Would love to hear people's views.
Alpha male programmers aren't keeping women out
Now that doesn't mean the underlying problem isn't worth dealing with. It absolutely is! I think that the world of programming could be much more interesting if more women were part of it. I wish I knew how to make that happen. If I find out, I'll be the first to champion it.This may get me a ton of down-votes, but I'm genuinely curious: is the gender gap in programming actually a problem? If so, why? In what ways would the world of programming be more interesting if it was more evenly split between men and women?I'm not trying to sound misogynistic or anything, just haven't thought much about this topic and I'm not sure I understand why it's considered a big problem. Would love to hear people's views.
I don't think that the lack of women programmers has much to do with male programmers or computer science programs. Male programmers and computer science programs always seem to love women who express an interest in it. Let's face it, none of us want this to be a male-only profession.However, society does socialize people into gender roles. Women are taught not to go for math (which computer science, at least at an academic level, depends on) and the sciences just as men are taught to forgo sociology. Remember, there are departments that are mostly women at colleges and it's equally telling to ask why there aren't men in those departments - not as a matter of discrimination, but a matter of socialization. Anyway, women tend to be pushed away from certain paths just as men are pushed away from certain paths (while I find nursing to be an admirable profession, what percentage of nurses do you think are male? And I think it's decently clear that from a young age, many of us have the image of doctors being male and nurses being female).It's a big problem in our society, but I don't think that programers and computer science departments are to blame. We train children from very young ages to go into certain roles. Once you're along a path (any path at any point in life) there is a high cost of switching. If you've been pushed away from math and science through high-school, the chance that you can switch that in college is very low. You have to make up a lot of work that the other students already did - and you're throwing away the work you've done on an alternate path. Having not had biology and chemistry in high-school, medicine was simply out of the question for me in college unless I intended to work much, much harder than my fellow students - and the premeds were an over-achieving bunch.And, really, this is more of a problem if you're going toward the science than if you're going toward the social sciences or humanities. Why? At my school, computer science was an 18 course major; nuroscience 21 courses; biochem was up there too. What did you need for history? 8 courses. Sociology? 10. Anthropology? 9. And you could usually take those courses at the same time while the sciences tend to build on each other in a linear fashion to a greater extent.It's harsh. Even if you want to change into a science, sometimes the barrier is too high. We need to do a better job teaching children that it's unacceptable for both genders to forgo science and math. Otherwise, you end up (like me) in a freshmen bio class realizing that you have to learn everything that everyone else knew from high-school without falling behind on this course. And I'd say that the majority would take the path of least resistance and go for something they weren't missing knowledge in.
Alpha male programmers aren't keeping women out
I don't think that the lack of women programmers has much to do with male programmers or computer science programs. Male programmers and computer science programs always seem to love women who express an interest in it. Let's face it, none of us want this to be a male-only profession.However, society does socialize people into gender roles. Women are taught not to go for math (which computer science, at least at an academic level, depends on) and the sciences just as men are taught to forgo sociology. Remember, there are departments that are mostly women at colleges and it's equally telling to ask why there aren't men in those departments - not as a matter of discrimination, but a matter of socialization. Anyway, women tend to be pushed away from certain paths just as men are pushed away from certain paths (while I find nursing to be an admirable profession, what percentage of nurses do you think are male? And I think it's decently clear that from a young age, many of us have the image of doctors being male and nurses being female).It's a big problem in our society, but I don't think that programers and computer science departments are to blame. We train children from very young ages to go into certain roles. Once you're along a path (any path at any point in life) there is a high cost of switching. If you've been pushed away from math and science through high-school, the chance that you can switch that in college is very low. You have to make up a lot of work that the other students already did - and you're throwing away the work you've done on an alternate path. Having not had biology and chemistry in high-school, medicine was simply out of the question for me in college unless I intended to work much, much harder than my fellow students - and the premeds were an over-achieving bunch.And, really, this is more of a problem if you're going toward the science than if you're going toward the social sciences or humanities. Why? At my school, computer science was an 18 course major; nuroscience 21 courses; biochem was up there too. What did you need for history? 8 courses. Sociology? 10. Anthropology? 9. And you could usually take those courses at the same time while the sciences tend to build on each other in a linear fashion to a greater extent.It's harsh. Even if you want to change into a science, sometimes the barrier is too high. We need to do a better job teaching children that it's unacceptable for both genders to forgo science and math. Otherwise, you end up (like me) in a freshmen bio class realizing that you have to learn everything that everyone else knew from high-school without falling behind on this course. And I'd say that the majority would take the path of least resistance and go for something they weren't missing knowledge in.
(Insert big anecdotal evidence disclaimer here...)It's not programmers that keep women out of programming (or IT in general). It's not the tools, the bad hours, the awkward guys, or the 'girls are bad at math'/'girls can't program' stereotypes. Right from the beginning I was pushed away from computers (before I'd even decided what field I wanted to apply myself to) by teachers, career advisers, college lecturers, friends, strangers, employers and sexist colleagues.I remember being 13/14 and sitting down to an 'interview' with a career adviser. We had to answer a series of questions on screen which were supposed to tell us our ideal career. Every time I answered I could see that various computer related careers were climbing up the list, and yet I was told by the chap doing the interview that I should be a vet or a police officer. Neither made much sense to me.My computing teacher in school used to prioritise computer access to the boys for after school 'computer club', and although I did ICT at college (A levels in the UK), lecturers informed me that I would only be able to use the qualifications to get into admin/secretary jobs (boys were told otherwise). I was one of only two girls on my course at college, and the other girl dropped out by the end of the second year due to family pressure. My last boss used to make derogatory remarks about the fact that I was female, and colleagues supported my male colleague over me.It's the attitude from everyone else that women can't and shouldn't get involved with computers that pushes women into other fields. I was lucky to have a very supportive family and a partner that wholeheartedly supports women in IT to push me through - oh, and being a stubborn bugger helped too :)
Alpha male programmers aren't keeping women out
(Insert big anecdotal evidence disclaimer here...)It's not programmers that keep women out of programming (or IT in general). It's not the tools, the bad hours, the awkward guys, or the 'girls are bad at math'/'girls can't program' stereotypes. Right from the beginning I was pushed away from computers (before I'd even decided what field I wanted to apply myself to) by teachers, career advisers, college lecturers, friends, strangers, employers and sexist colleagues.I remember being 13/14 and sitting down to an 'interview' with a career adviser. We had to answer a series of questions on screen which were supposed to tell us our ideal career. Every time I answered I could see that various computer related careers were climbing up the list, and yet I was told by the chap doing the interview that I should be a vet or a police officer. Neither made much sense to me.My computing teacher in school used to prioritise computer access to the boys for after school 'computer club', and although I did ICT at college (A levels in the UK), lecturers informed me that I would only be able to use the qualifications to get into admin/secretary jobs (boys were told otherwise). I was one of only two girls on my course at college, and the other girl dropped out by the end of the second year due to family pressure. My last boss used to make derogatory remarks about the fact that I was female, and colleagues supported my male colleague over me.It's the attitude from everyone else that women can't and shouldn't get involved with computers that pushes women into other fields. I was lucky to have a very supportive family and a partner that wholeheartedly supports women in IT to push me through - oh, and being a stubborn bugger helped too :)
Interesting, but I think this argument is flawed. The author notes that different professions tend to have different distributions of male personality types. Programmers tend towards meek and introverted, lawyers and businessmen more alpha, yet women don't shy away from those fields.This seems to assume that women must magically all have the same personality type and/or no personality selection bias in their career choices. Since women are comfortable going head-to-head with alpha-male lawyers, they therefore should be totally comfortable with geeky programmers. I don't buy it -- all women are not the same, just like all men are not the same.It seems to me that women who become lawyers or businesspeople likely have A-type personalities themselves. Accordingly, they are probably more likely to view competition or confrontation with males in the workplace as a motivating challenge. Women who become programmers are probably, just like male programmers, a bit more introverted and geeky. Accordingly, confrontation/competition with males in the workplace is probably less likely to be motivating, and more likely to be intimidating -- especially when you consider that many "meek" male programmer types tend to drastically overcompensate for insecurity in physical situations with hyper-competitive and vitriolic behavior in virtual environments (I wonder what the gender and programmer/non-programmer ratios are like on 4chan).In other words, just because male programmers don't rank as alpha-males relative to the general male population doesn't mean they don't behave like alpha-males in their own environment, especially relative to the female personality types interested in becoming programmers.My 2 cents.
Show HN: SharingMeter.org - Find out how popular a link is
So if a link is popular I shouldn't share it cuz everybody else already did?
Cool! I would be curious to learn what will be the conversion rate from visitors to sign ups for the alerts, if you're willing to share that after some time :)
Show HN: SharingMeter.org - Find out how popular a link is
Cool! I would be curious to learn what will be the conversion rate from visitors to sign ups for the alerts, if you're willing to share that after some time :)
A little tool we developed as a weekend project to test and debug a bigger project we are working on.We thought it would be useful to others.
Show HN: SharingMeter.org - Find out how popular a link is
A little tool we developed as a weekend project to test and debug a bigger project we are working on.We thought it would be useful to others.
I was about to add this to Chrome and then it asked for "all of your data on all web sites" which is too much for me.
Show HN: SharingMeter.org - Find out how popular a link is
I was about to add this to Chrome and then it asked for "all of your data on all web sites" which is too much for me.
Damn! Thats inspiring...
Why isn't join.app.net catching on?
I don't think that the main problems are in name / marketing. While these, and price (which is a legit concern) definitely contribute, the whole idea doesn't sit that well with me.First off, what exactly is it? JSON-based message bus PaaS? Paid social network? Appstore? A development platform? "mobile social entertainment provider"? Something else? I understand that they're working off a broad idea, but it would be reasonable IMO for someone to think that they're attempting each of these. The blog posts and join.app.net don't really clarify things too much. I think that a broad roadmap (or something accessible to users, and devs who don't want to read the whole backstory to try to figure it out) would really help here.Next up, the project doesn't really sell me on its benefits. Developers/users can pay to be able to write to a feed that other developers/users pay to be able to access (or can access for free?)? There's some potential for turning it into an app-store type thing, making it free for developers and splitting user revenue (with the example given where app.net takes 50%)? What concrete benefits, as a developer, or user, will I be able to derive from this service, guaranteed, in the near future?All of the questions here are part of the reason that I'm not particularly excited about it. IMO there are some great ideas in there, and it has a lot of potential, but at the moment it seems like it's not too much more than some hand-waving and assertions that Twitter's bad, and that you should pay for an (at current) nearly identical experience because it has a whole lot of potential at some undefined point in the future. When originally pitching the thing Caldwell made some comments about how it's not fair to assume that you can somehow improve your monetization later, but this seems to be almost the same thing in reverse - they've got their monetization down, but they're assuming that they can somehow add the value for users later. Of course, I could be completely misunderstanding what they're doing / trying to do or how they're going about doing it...
This post is obviously quite biased towards join.app.net, which I'm not entirely against but some of the arguments are very weak.> The current price of $50/year for users and $100/year for developers is fair,Not when you have no details over what the service is going to offer, what control you're going to have, and how the price may change in the future. Essentially, people have no idea what they're buying. You're asking for a $50 dollar a donation and offering WAY less information than any kickstarter campaign that I've seen.My thought process when looking at join.app.net1. Who the fuck is Dalton Caldwell?2. Why can't they just use kickstarter?3. Who do they think is going to pay $50 a year for something that Facebook and Google give away for free?4. Why is their campaign page so saccharine?5. Why go from having no control to having implicit control (because you're paying for it), when clearly the best solution would be to have full control (and pay for it)?5a. I can get hosting for $60 a year, $10 more than join.app.net is going to cost me. I'm sure if it caught on, I could get a 'join.app' instance hosted for much less than that.So here's the solution - write a spec for a protocol that lives on top of HTTP. Polish the spec. Publish the spec. Write to the spec, be first to market, and sell 'join.app' instances at $12/year. Profit wildly.We all know an ad supported Internet cannot thrive, but free-to-fifty is not a jump that 99.99% of users are going to be willing to make.
Why isn't join.app.net catching on?
This post is obviously quite biased towards join.app.net, which I'm not entirely against but some of the arguments are very weak.> The current price of $50/year for users and $100/year for developers is fair,Not when you have no details over what the service is going to offer, what control you're going to have, and how the price may change in the future. Essentially, people have no idea what they're buying. You're asking for a $50 dollar a donation and offering WAY less information than any kickstarter campaign that I've seen.My thought process when looking at join.app.net1. Who the fuck is Dalton Caldwell?2. Why can't they just use kickstarter?3. Who do they think is going to pay $50 a year for something that Facebook and Google give away for free?4. Why is their campaign page so saccharine?5. Why go from having no control to having implicit control (because you're paying for it), when clearly the best solution would be to have full control (and pay for it)?5a. I can get hosting for $60 a year, $10 more than join.app.net is going to cost me. I'm sure if it caught on, I could get a 'join.app' instance hosted for much less than that.So here's the solution - write a spec for a protocol that lives on top of HTTP. Polish the spec. Publish the spec. Write to the spec, be first to market, and sell 'join.app' instances at $12/year. Profit wildly.We all know an ad supported Internet cannot thrive, but free-to-fifty is not a jump that 99.99% of users are going to be willing to make.
They frame the benefits of their platform with too much ideology and too little practicality.Developers can be very ideological, but when it comes to spending money, even we have to be somewhat practical.The question in my mind, when I looked at their website, was "What can I build with this?" That's a question that should be answered by their pitch.It would be a much more convincing pitch if they listed a few example application ideas and discussed the role that app.net would play in the implementation.But as it stands, I can't really see what architectural pain point is solved by join.app.net, that couldn't be better solved by existing solutions like RSS, that are far less expensive to host.
Why isn't join.app.net catching on?
They frame the benefits of their platform with too much ideology and too little practicality.Developers can be very ideological, but when it comes to spending money, even we have to be somewhat practical.The question in my mind, when I looked at their website, was "What can I build with this?" That's a question that should be answered by their pitch.It would be a much more convincing pitch if they listed a few example application ideas and discussed the role that app.net would play in the implementation.But as it stands, I can't really see what architectural pain point is solved by join.app.net, that couldn't be better solved by existing solutions like RSS, that are far less expensive to host.
Fatigue? Apathy? Both?It seems Twitter has not exactly turned out to be what everyone had hoped, which has probably dampened the enthusiasm. Also, it seems the long-term goal is to build an API with no mention of what happens afterwards.So, aside from crowdfunding, how is app.net a long-term business?Anyone can write a good-bad-indifferent API and publish the standard, but what differentiates these guys from some other api that does exactly the same thing?
Why isn't join.app.net catching on?
Fatigue? Apathy? Both?It seems Twitter has not exactly turned out to be what everyone had hoped, which has probably dampened the enthusiasm. Also, it seems the long-term goal is to build an API with no mention of what happens afterwards.So, aside from crowdfunding, how is app.net a long-term business?Anyone can write a good-bad-indifferent API and publish the standard, but what differentiates these guys from some other api that does exactly the same thing?
I'm guessing people don't want to fork down the money!
Peter Sunde arrested in Sweden
From Google translate ...Peter Sunde arrested in SkåneOne of the brains behind the file sharing site The Pirate Bay has been arrested.Peter Sunde, 35, was arrested today in a raid in southern Sweden.- He has been on the run since 2012 , says Carolina Ekéus , press contact at NCIS .Rikskriminalen state that Peter Sunde has been wanted by Interpol and that he is now arrested.- He was arrested for him to serve a prison sentence of eight months. It's about the Pirate Bay case , says Caroline Ekéus .Expressen says that the raid took place at a farm in Skåne Tonganoxie . According to the newspaper shall Polish police and skånsk picket police have participated in the arrest . Sentenced to prisonPeter Sunde were sentenced for aiding copyright infringement along with two other men in the Svea Court of Appeal in November 2010. Together sentenced Pirate Bay founders in addition to prison to pay damages of around 46 million.In its judgement, the Court of Appeals held that the men through file-sharing site The Pirate Bay " has facilitated illegal file sharing in a way that lead to penalties for those who run the service ."Peter Sunde has repeatedly applied for revision of the Supreme Court , most recently in February this year. He also refers to new cases from the European Court which deals with how to assess aiding and abetting . "Deeply unhappy 'Peter sundes defender Peter Althin says to Aftonbladet that he still finds it difficult to accept the verdict .- Has a final judgment , you have to enter and serve this . I kväljer them but I still think that the judgement is deeply unfortunate and inaccurate when it comes to him. There was nothing that showed that he had an active part in this as he was sentenced for, says Peter Althin.He says that an open prison now awaits Peter Sunde.- It does not get Kumla Security or something like that. It will be a little more open prison and that will happen pretty soon, says Peter Althin.
Relevant: If you haven't seen it, TPB: AFK is a fantastic documentary.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TPB_AFKhttp://watch.tpbafk.tv/
Peter Sunde arrested in Sweden
Relevant: If you haven't seen it, TPB: AFK is a fantastic documentary.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TPB_AFKhttp://watch.tpbafk.tv/
Very clever to arrest him after the elections. Before the elections this would have been a much bigger issue and possibly would have gained votes for the Swedish Pirate Party resulting in more seats in the European Parliament for them.
Peter Sunde arrested in Sweden
Very clever to arrest him after the elections. Before the elections this would have been a much bigger issue and possibly would have gained votes for the Swedish Pirate Party resulting in more seats in the European Parliament for them.
Gottfrid Svartholm is currently being held in solitary confinement in Denmark, Peter Sunde is arrested in Sweden. I thought these countries were like role models.
Peter Sunde arrested in Sweden
Gottfrid Svartholm is currently being held in solitary confinement in Denmark, Peter Sunde is arrested in Sweden. I thought these countries were like role models.
Too bad he didn't made to the EU Parliament.That makes two out of the three in jail, which is very saddening. I wonder what will happen to Frederik: I doubt they will just let him be. They are beating three to scare millions.
Understanding Quaternions (2012)
Where the author talks about imaginary numbers being completely "made up" and suggests you shouldn't bother with trying to understand them, I think that's selling them short.Imagine, if you will, trying to explain to the ancient Greeks the idea of a number that can't be written as a division of integers (the irrational numbers). That would have seemed completely "made up" to them, but we don't really see them that way, they just "are". That concept is has since become normalized, in terms of everyday concepts (like the area of a unit circle). Similar situations arise with fractions or negative numbers to some indigenous tribes, etc.I guess what I'm saying is that complex numbers only as fictitious or imaginary as any other set of numbers that we otherwise feel like we have a good handle on.
Not bad, but I find this to be a state of the art explanation of quaternions: http://acko.net/blog/animate-your-way-to-glory-pt2/#quaterni...
Understanding Quaternions (2012)
Not bad, but I find this to be a state of the art explanation of quaternions: http://acko.net/blog/animate-your-way-to-glory-pt2/#quaterni...
Another good reference:http://www.songho.ca/math/quaternion/quaternion.html
Understanding Quaternions (2012)
Another good reference:http://www.songho.ca/math/quaternion/quaternion.html
There's also octonions and sedenions. I prefer the blanket term onion-algebras.
Understanding Quaternions (2012)
There's also octonions and sedenions. I prefer the blanket term onion-algebras.
Has anyone here ever seen a good explanation of why quaternion multiplication maps to rotation concatenation?
I have found a potential team, but...
Find a small project (1-2 wks of work) you can work on together and make it clear that it is a trial process to see how you will all work together; something other than your startup (for possible legal reasons in the future). If any of them are unwilling to do this, that should be your first signal that that person isn't right for you. Also since they came up to you after the presentation of the idea I would definitely make sure they know that whatever you are doing isn't the "one true idea" as it stands now, since it is likely to change significantly as you continue to work on it.The "just go for it" is advice lite and I wouldn't take it, at least not for choosing your team, which is likely far more important than your idea.
Eat with them every day for a week. You will find out a lot about each other.> ...because I know emotions can fog up the intellect and really mess up your decisions.Is there a particular emotion that's giving you trouble? I wouldn't distrust all of them...
I have found a potential team, but...
Eat with them every day for a week. You will find out a lot about each other.> ...because I know emotions can fog up the intellect and really mess up your decisions.Is there a particular emotion that's giving you trouble? I wouldn't distrust all of them...
I think you are over thinking this.Sit back, don't put in a bunch of cash. Don't let anyone go in over $1,000(two semesters of books), and you should just ride it out.In all likelihood you will not succeed, but do not take that as a reason not to give it a try. I learned so much from my college projects that sounded very similar to your situation.And last of all remember that if you were able to come up with one good idea, there will be more, you are young and have decades of life in front of you.Get out there and run full speed with this team, do the best you can to make a go of it, and you might find your self succeeding. But, if things do not go as planned, chalk it up to just another life lesson, and try again some time.
I have found a potential team, but...
I think you are over thinking this.Sit back, don't put in a bunch of cash. Don't let anyone go in over $1,000(two semesters of books), and you should just ride it out.In all likelihood you will not succeed, but do not take that as a reason not to give it a try. I learned so much from my college projects that sounded very similar to your situation.And last of all remember that if you were able to come up with one good idea, there will be more, you are young and have decades of life in front of you.Get out there and run full speed with this team, do the best you can to make a go of it, and you might find your self succeeding. But, if things do not go as planned, chalk it up to just another life lesson, and try again some time.
Entrepreneurship is an adventure! You're young yet, give it a shot, and you'll learn a lot. You're team may not be superstars, but if they have the drive to see the project through, and can bring your idea to fruition, it's worth pursuing.If you feel your idea is a truly radical innovation, and you're willing to give your heart and soul for it, then it might be worth seeking out an ideal team. However, given what you've said, it sounds like you've made this decision on a whim. I'd say, go for it if it feels right.
I have found a potential team, but...
Entrepreneurship is an adventure! You're young yet, give it a shot, and you'll learn a lot. You're team may not be superstars, but if they have the drive to see the project through, and can bring your idea to fruition, it's worth pursuing.If you feel your idea is a truly radical innovation, and you're willing to give your heart and soul for it, then it might be worth seeking out an ideal team. However, given what you've said, it sounds like you've made this decision on a whim. I'd say, go for it if it feels right.
The founding team, like any business partnership is like a marriage. Both are social-economic institutions. Both need chemistry to succeed. Both are really messy and messy when it comes time for the breakup. The child custody fight and the division of the assets may not always be equitable. Or, the team might do well together, the startup fail, and everyone parts as friends. There's lots of good suggestions here, and Paul Graham has written a number of insightful essays on the YC library and on his site. The misgivings might be a simply one of, "Well, if my project is so great ... shouldn't I be more picky about who I want to work with?" It might be some instinct tipping you off. Whatever the case, you'll have to look at both the strategic advantage for you and all the human motivations involved (including your's). Sorry I couldn't be more specific.
Show HN: BestBooks100.com
Direct link: http://www.bestbooks100.com
I'd love it if there was more space below the title image. :P Otherwise, it looks okay. 2 small things that came to mind is the hover effect on the book images and the possibility of having a small blurb in the hover box for each book?
Show HN: BestBooks100.com
I'd love it if there was more space below the title image. :P Otherwise, it looks okay. 2 small things that came to mind is the hover effect on the book images and the possibility of having a small blurb in the hover box for each book?
One thing with top x lists is they can suffer from not showing good older titles in favour of recent more hyped titles. Wonder if there is a way to account for this? So it is a more of an all time top x list?
Show HN: BestBooks100.com
One thing with top x lists is they can suffer from not showing good older titles in favour of recent more hyped titles. Wonder if there is a way to account for this? So it is a more of an all time top x list?
nice ! is there a way for visitors to vote on their favorite books & you order books based on that ?maybe even add a few if you missed out something ??
Show HN: BestBooks100.com
nice ! is there a way for visitors to vote on their favorite books & you order books based on that ?maybe even add a few if you missed out something ??
That's a really nice and simple idea. You could turn it into a game, where people vote by bumping their favourite books against others.
How to make your application viral - A guide to getting users
When I think about social software (which is the context in which "virality" lives, anyway) I think you have to build for three things - in this order:1. Utility - it must be high utility, even if nobody else is in the system.2. Network Effect - As people are drawn into the system, it needs to scale in value more than linearly3. Residual value - Value taken out of the system, sometimes as revenue. Typically ads.I think that it's not good enough to do these alone, however. You must construct something that isn't just viral but that makes it such that the fact that some person is not on the system is PAINFULLY ANNOYING to the actual users of the system. Consider the growth of email, in general: "Please just go sign up for an email address somewhere so I can email you!"If you construct it in this manner, you do not have to spam people. Delicious, which has a lot of users, never emailed anything other than password resets, for example.
I think one thing you're missing is the idea of social validation, or social proof, of your product. Like TallGuyShort said, getting invitation emails is rather annoying, and quite insincere. Users can spot that insincerity in a heartbeat. Sure, you'll rake in some users, but what you want is to create a demand for the product. When I did that whole FluShirts thing, I used twitter to message people, and within seconds I would see them tweet "haha, check out these shirts [flushirts url]." I'm not sure as to what percentage of shirts I sold were because of twitter referrals, but what that did at the very least was introduce my product to others in a genuine manner to potential customers using their friends.Of course, to gain social validation of your product, it needs to be useful and something people will enjoy. There are some counterexamples, like hi5, that are fairly popular and got to that point because of their random email invitations (I don't know who you are Aaron, Britney, and Alexa), and to that, I'm not quite sure what to say. I guess they found a market. But as far as virality goes, in the genuine sense, I think Facebook/Myspace/Twitter beat hi5.
How to make your application viral - A guide to getting users
I think one thing you're missing is the idea of social validation, or social proof, of your product. Like TallGuyShort said, getting invitation emails is rather annoying, and quite insincere. Users can spot that insincerity in a heartbeat. Sure, you'll rake in some users, but what you want is to create a demand for the product. When I did that whole FluShirts thing, I used twitter to message people, and within seconds I would see them tweet "haha, check out these shirts [flushirts url]." I'm not sure as to what percentage of shirts I sold were because of twitter referrals, but what that did at the very least was introduce my product to others in a genuine manner to potential customers using their friends.Of course, to gain social validation of your product, it needs to be useful and something people will enjoy. There are some counterexamples, like hi5, that are fairly popular and got to that point because of their random email invitations (I don't know who you are Aaron, Britney, and Alexa), and to that, I'm not quite sure what to say. I guess they found a market. But as far as virality goes, in the genuine sense, I think Facebook/Myspace/Twitter beat hi5.
"How can I make my app viral" seems like asking yourself "How can I make someone love me".You don't want to make users want to spread your app, you want them to want to spread your app.The "Invite people" forms are a really bad way of doing things IMHO. It's like asking your wife/hubby to fill in a form detailing how much she loves you.I'd also say a good strategy is to give users something for free, that they think should cost money - they'll be sure to tell their friends off their own back.Still good ideas in the original article though.
How to make your application viral - A guide to getting users
"How can I make my app viral" seems like asking yourself "How can I make someone love me".You don't want to make users want to spread your app, you want them to want to spread your app.The "Invite people" forms are a really bad way of doing things IMHO. It's like asking your wife/hubby to fill in a form detailing how much she loves you.I'd also say a good strategy is to give users something for free, that they think should cost money - they'll be sure to tell their friends off their own back.Still good ideas in the original article though.
I actually find the examples it cites extremely annoying. I don't like getting constant emails from services just to remind me they exist, I don't like constantly being asked to give referrals, etc...If I like something, I go out of my way to recommend it. If not - emails aren't going to convince me you have a good product - if people like it, it ought to spread itself.
How to make your application viral - A guide to getting users
I actually find the examples it cites extremely annoying. I don't like getting constant emails from services just to remind me they exist, I don't like constantly being asked to give referrals, etc...If I like something, I go out of my way to recommend it. If not - emails aren't going to convince me you have a good product - if people like it, it ought to spread itself.
A point to add to the discussion from the metrics perspective: the net promoter score.Net promoter score is an easy tool you can use to determine trends in your users' experience. It can be used as a leading indicator of the 'N' part of your viral coefficient. eries goes in to detail in "Net Promoter Score: an operational tool to measure customer satisfaction" (http://startuplessonslearned.blogspot.com/2008/11/net-promot...).Additional reading from HN members:jfarmer's "Three myths of Viral Growth" (http://20bits.com/articles/three-myths-of-viral-growth/)
Chart.js - open source HTML5 charting library
A bit of the shame on the interactivity:"If you are looking to add interaction as a layer to charts, Chart.js is not the library for you. A better option would be using SVG, as this will let you attach event listeners to any of the elements in the chart, as these are all DOM nodes."Most charts are far more useful with rollovers to let the user interpret the data. I'd say this is a must have for most anything where you really are trying to give the user insight into the dataset.Also seems to be a bit of a punt by saying this just isn't possible in Canvas. We know where the cursor is no? And we know where the points are. So can't we react to the cursor hovering over a point? What am I missing?
Well done nick. This is the perfect example of a unicorn project - the perfect mix a technical solution, but with immaculate design sense. Even the documentation is beautiful.Would love to see this MIT licensed.I would love to see you rewarded for this project. Donations or a commercial support licence?
Chart.js - open source HTML5 charting library
Well done nick. This is the perfect example of a unicorn project - the perfect mix a technical solution, but with immaculate design sense. Even the documentation is beautiful.Would love to see this MIT licensed.I would love to see you rewarded for this project. Donations or a commercial support licence?
One thing I love about Highcharts is that the documentation is heavily linked to examples on jsfiddle. Your documentation looks really nice and you have lots of nice examples, but I can't play with them.edit: I meant to say that I can't play with them as far as I can tell. Is there a way that I'm missing?
Chart.js - open source HTML5 charting library
One thing I love about Highcharts is that the documentation is heavily linked to examples on jsfiddle. Your documentation looks really nice and you have lots of nice examples, but I can't play with them.edit: I meant to say that I can't play with them as far as I can tell. Is there a way that I'm missing?
Good job, your charts look really good. Too bad they aren't interactive, it makes the legend+values mandatory to understand the data. Unless you just want to use them as art.Also, the pie chart and doughnut charts seem odd. The general rule is to order the values clockwise (biggest piece starts in top middle and extends to the right). It really helps readability and is a convention.Keep up the good work!
Chart.js - open source HTML5 charting library
Good job, your charts look really good. Too bad they aren't interactive, it makes the legend+values mandatory to understand the data. Unless you just want to use them as art.Also, the pie chart and doughnut charts seem odd. The general rule is to order the values clockwise (biggest piece starts in top middle and extends to the right). It really helps readability and is a convention.Keep up the good work!
I've been making a ton of d3/html5 charts lately, and I've been terribly dissappointed by the open source offerings of graphs that are both beautiful(tons on dribbble, few even in html) and functional. Was going to work on one, but this actually looks really good!edit: any reason you decided not to use D3 for this?
I made $200K and PayPal locked my account
From your comments, you had multiple PayPal accounts (disallowed), were in Venezuela, using a US PayPal account, then transferring the funds to a PayPal account in Venezuela, and can't provide a tax ID for the US account. At the same time, you went from zero to hundreds of thousands in payments in just a few months. To PayPal, you likely appear to be a criminal involved in some type of money laundering or tax evasion scheme. I don't know enough about student Visas and international tax agreements to say you aren't actually engaging in tax evasion, perhaps unknowingly.It's not surprising they locked the account and asked for documentation. The tax code pretty much guarantees they would within a year in order to file the 1099-K on your account. This stuff is serious to them, both from a financial (the potential losses if this money disappears because it's not been moving legally) and regulatory fronts (US Patriot Act among others requires banks, like those underwriting your US PayPal account, to be able to accurately identify their customers). This might not be easy to fix.
Sorry to hear about the troubles :(If this wasn't the umpteenth time I've heard this story, I wouldn't say this so pesteringly:To everyone: Stop stop stop stop stop using PayPal. This happens over and over again. For once, thankfully, there are viable alternatives out there -- Stripe & WePay to name two (both of which I've had excellent experiences with).Not saying they're panaceas or that there won't be security/freezing issues from the new guys, but PayPal has a documented, extensive, and repeated history of freezing accounts with large amounts of money in them over short(ish) periods of time.
I made $200K and PayPal locked my account
Sorry to hear about the troubles :(If this wasn't the umpteenth time I've heard this story, I wouldn't say this so pesteringly:To everyone: Stop stop stop stop stop using PayPal. This happens over and over again. For once, thankfully, there are viable alternatives out there -- Stripe & WePay to name two (both of which I've had excellent experiences with).Not saying they're panaceas or that there won't be security/freezing issues from the new guys, but PayPal has a documented, extensive, and repeated history of freezing accounts with large amounts of money in them over short(ish) periods of time.
Sad story, I agree with folks who say you should seek out legal advice.HEADS UP FOR ANYONE ELSE CONSIDERING THIS:If you are going to receive funds with PayPal and they are going to exceed the 'occasional sale' guidelines (which some people interpret to mean the same guidelines at the rule for sending an IRS 1099 form which is < $600 annually.First establish your business presence in the US, that means creating an LLC, getting an EIN [1] and establishing a relationship with a US based bank.If you get hung up on those steps, don't start taking money with PayPal because their zealous anti-fraud/laundering/drug program fires on a hair trigger. It didn't help that the OP is a student from Venezuela which is not one of America's trading partners.I expect you will lose most of this money in legal fees. However, if the business is durable, and you manage to establish your LLC (that lawyer you got can help with that) then you will make it back and PayPal will back down. As long as the money trail can be tracked and everyone in the path reports it to the Federal Government so that they are satisfied it isn't part of a laundering scheme[2], or if it was they can catch the folks involved, you will be ok.[1] http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Taxpa...[2] This is how the laundering scheme would work. Some criminal enterprise hires a bunch of third parties to buy your 'widget' for an inflated price, say $10,000 per copy. You sell the 20 copies, get the $200,000, now you go to a coffee shop owned by the criminal enterprise and buy a Double Vente Latte for $180,000 made out of hand picked coffee beans. The crook now has $180,000 of "legitimate" income from his coffee shop, you have $20,000 in "profits" on your amazing Javascript widget, and 20 drug dealers have a bit of software they just delete from their hard drive (if they down loaded it at all). Everybody "wins." So the US Government wants to be able to subpoena your customer list to track the money from the drug dealers to you and then back to the crooks. Paypal helps with that. If you make it hard for them to do that, they keep you money.
I made $200K and PayPal locked my account
Sad story, I agree with folks who say you should seek out legal advice.HEADS UP FOR ANYONE ELSE CONSIDERING THIS:If you are going to receive funds with PayPal and they are going to exceed the 'occasional sale' guidelines (which some people interpret to mean the same guidelines at the rule for sending an IRS 1099 form which is < $600 annually.First establish your business presence in the US, that means creating an LLC, getting an EIN [1] and establishing a relationship with a US based bank.If you get hung up on those steps, don't start taking money with PayPal because their zealous anti-fraud/laundering/drug program fires on a hair trigger. It didn't help that the OP is a student from Venezuela which is not one of America's trading partners.I expect you will lose most of this money in legal fees. However, if the business is durable, and you manage to establish your LLC (that lawyer you got can help with that) then you will make it back and PayPal will back down. As long as the money trail can be tracked and everyone in the path reports it to the Federal Government so that they are satisfied it isn't part of a laundering scheme[2], or if it was they can catch the folks involved, you will be ok.[1] http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Taxpa...[2] This is how the laundering scheme would work. Some criminal enterprise hires a bunch of third parties to buy your 'widget' for an inflated price, say $10,000 per copy. You sell the 20 copies, get the $200,000, now you go to a coffee shop owned by the criminal enterprise and buy a Double Vente Latte for $180,000 made out of hand picked coffee beans. The crook now has $180,000 of "legitimate" income from his coffee shop, you have $20,000 in "profits" on your amazing Javascript widget, and 20 drug dealers have a bit of software they just delete from their hard drive (if they down loaded it at all). Everybody "wins." So the US Government wants to be able to subpoena your customer list to track the money from the drug dealers to you and then back to the crooks. Paypal helps with that. If you make it hard for them to do that, they keep you money.
When you say you're an international student, do you mean you're in the US on an F-1 visa? If yes, you might be in violation of your visa terms. If you have not researched this, please start reading at http://www.justanswer.com/immigration-law/330cd-holding-f-1-...
I made $200K and PayPal locked my account
When you say you're an international student, do you mean you're in the US on an F-1 visa? If yes, you might be in violation of your visa terms. If you have not researched this, please start reading at http://www.justanswer.com/immigration-law/330cd-holding-f-1-...
Apply for a TIN - taxpayer identification number. PayPal can use it in lieu of an SSN. This will take you six weeks. In the alternative, consult a local lawyer and have them nastygram Paypal for you.
New Theory on Why Stonehenge Was Built
One of my old Physics teachers was an expert on Stone Henge. Did a lot of original research in the 1980s. From what I recall Stone Henge is actually multiple sites on top of each other, so when someone says "this is what Stone Henge was for" I am skeptical because we're talking an enormous span of time and several re-buildings with no guarantee that all were for the same reason.This article title is slightly misleading. The migration route of Aurochs theory certainly gives an explanation as to why ancient people gathered in this location. But it doesn't give reason for why the specific structures at Stone Henge were built, as people might assume from the title.What I recall from my old teacher, and his work, was that you can pretty clearly demonstrate that the structures were there for observing the sun cycles, as was typical of many megalithic monuments - sun & moon cycles. Most of the other claimed observations can be explained away as statistical artifacts. Given the evidence of burial and the fact such observations would have had religious significance I haven't seen much to challenge the existing understanding of the site.As an aside, I have visited many megalithic sites in the British Isles (many years go). I find them fascinating. One thing that people often remark on is how they're often in the middle of nowhere, but when they were built they were often in clearings in dense forests, but over time as we domesticated animals that would feed on the bark, killing the trees, then eat the new shoots, over many centuries - millennia - we deforested, for example the moors, and the megalithic sites became elegant monuments to a forgotten age, standing proud against a bleak landscape.
> "Researchers think the giant boulders came from a quarry near Marlborough Downs, just 20 miles (32 kilometers) from the iconic site…"One can't help but smile at the "just" there! Perhaps if the author tried moving them they might have chosen a different word.
New Theory on Why Stonehenge Was Built
> "Researchers think the giant boulders came from a quarry near Marlborough Downs, just 20 miles (32 kilometers) from the iconic site…"One can't help but smile at the "just" there! Perhaps if the author tried moving them they might have chosen a different word.
It doesn't seem like this is a new theory explaining why it was built as much as a theory explaining why there were people in the area to begin with.
New Theory on Why Stonehenge Was Built
It doesn't seem like this is a new theory explaining why it was built as much as a theory explaining why there were people in the area to begin with.
I'm not sur if its me noticing things or the zeitgiest, but ancient history seems to be really interesting right now.There were people here a long time ago. They were doing stuff. We have no idea what or why. A tiny fraction of their stuff was big and stone and durable enough to last thousands of years and let us know they were there and doing interesting things. But, we don't have any context. It would be like future generations finding a gigantic open pit mine in one place an airport runway in another place and a giant statue of Kim Jong Un and speculating about out society.BTW, If there where stonehenges & Pyramids from 20k years ago, would they have lasted till now? We tend to assume not much was going on during the paleolithic. If city states trade & large structures existed during those times, would we know about it?
New Theory on Why Stonehenge Was Built
I'm not sur if its me noticing things or the zeitgiest, but ancient history seems to be really interesting right now.There were people here a long time ago. They were doing stuff. We have no idea what or why. A tiny fraction of their stuff was big and stone and durable enough to last thousands of years and let us know they were there and doing interesting things. But, we don't have any context. It would be like future generations finding a gigantic open pit mine in one place an airport runway in another place and a giant statue of Kim Jong Un and speculating about out society.BTW, If there where stonehenges & Pyramids from 20k years ago, would they have lasted till now? We tend to assume not much was going on during the paleolithic. If city states trade & large structures existed during those times, would we know about it?
> the site, which was occupied continuously for 3,000 yearsGives you a pause, doesn't it?
The Oculus Rift Made Me Believe I Could Fly
> The consumer version of the Rift should be out in about a year.Yeah, and will I be able to buy one and use it without Facebook keeping a permanent record of everything I do with it (tied to my real name of course)? Will it refuse to work unless it's online? I was really looking forward to the Oculus, but man ... if there is an alternative that doesn't have FB integration, I think I'll buy that instead.
I wonder, what do you guys think virtual reality do to the tourism industry ?
The Oculus Rift Made Me Believe I Could Fly
I wonder, what do you guys think virtual reality do to the tourism industry ?
This is pretty neat. What other potential, non-gimmicky solutions could be built with VR this way? What about 10 years from now?Also, who remembers the movie: FireFox, with Clint Eastwood? :)
The Oculus Rift Made Me Believe I Could Fly
This is pretty neat. What other potential, non-gimmicky solutions could be built with VR this way? What about 10 years from now?Also, who remembers the movie: FireFox, with Clint Eastwood? :)
Correction:Virtual reality goggles and the Birdly apparatus made them think they could fly.The copious references to Oculus make me think the Facebook PR team have swung into action, to try to bolster waning interest in Oculus after the disastrous sellout to Facebook.I'm eagerly awaiting an Oculus alternative, having canceled the DK2 plans. I don't really want to be tying my code into the horrendous Facebook codebase and agenda.
The Oculus Rift Made Me Believe I Could Fly
Correction:Virtual reality goggles and the Birdly apparatus made them think they could fly.The copious references to Oculus make me think the Facebook PR team have swung into action, to try to bolster waning interest in Oculus after the disastrous sellout to Facebook.I'm eagerly awaiting an Oculus alternative, having canceled the DK2 plans. I don't really want to be tying my code into the horrendous Facebook codebase and agenda.
Video: http://vimeo.com/91069214
I seem to be writing a web-app framework. Any advice?
"... What kinds of features would you like to see in a framework? ..."explain to me how you intend to let users get to the data? Not pages but raw data (xml, rss, microformats etc). Oh that and cool-uri's. URI's created in a lot of frameworks suck. How are you going to create cool uri's? ~ http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
Wait until you write the second webapp, and see which bits of the first one you really do reuse without modification?
I seem to be writing a web-app framework. Any advice?
Wait until you write the second webapp, and see which bits of the first one you really do reuse without modification?
Nested components sounds like Weblocks, http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-weblocks/, but I'm guessing you're already aware of it.I just started working on a site using Hunchentoot and CL-WHO as well, send me a note if you're interested in collaborating.
I seem to be writing a web-app framework. Any advice?
Nested components sounds like Weblocks, http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-weblocks/, but I'm guessing you're already aware of it.I just started working on a site using Hunchentoot and CL-WHO as well, send me a note if you're interested in collaborating.
Zak, that sounds vague. So I don't understand what you've done. And Rails can be much flexible. What are benefits from your framework for a particular types of web apps?
I seem to be writing a web-app framework. Any advice?
Zak, that sounds vague. So I don't understand what you've done. And Rails can be much flexible. What are benefits from your framework for a particular types of web apps?
Have you seen UCW?