Pretergeek's picture
Adding Evaluation Results (#1)
af2100c verified
|
raw
history blame
7.91 kB
metadata
license: apache-2.0
library_name: transformers
tags:
  - mergekit
  - merge
base_model:
  - openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
model-index:
  - name: OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End
    results:
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: IFEval (0-Shot)
          type: HuggingFaceH4/ifeval
          args:
            num_few_shot: 0
        metrics:
          - type: inst_level_strict_acc and prompt_level_strict_acc
            value: 59.61
            name: strict accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co./spaces/open-llm-leaderboard/open_llm_leaderboard?query=Pretergeek/OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: BBH (3-Shot)
          type: BBH
          args:
            num_few_shot: 3
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 24.06
            name: normalized accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co./spaces/open-llm-leaderboard/open_llm_leaderboard?query=Pretergeek/OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: MATH Lvl 5 (4-Shot)
          type: hendrycks/competition_math
          args:
            num_few_shot: 4
        metrics:
          - type: exact_match
            value: 6.8
            name: exact match
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co./spaces/open-llm-leaderboard/open_llm_leaderboard?query=Pretergeek/OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: GPQA (0-shot)
          type: Idavidrein/gpqa
          args:
            num_few_shot: 0
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 7.61
            name: acc_norm
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co./spaces/open-llm-leaderboard/open_llm_leaderboard?query=Pretergeek/OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: MuSR (0-shot)
          type: TAUR-Lab/MuSR
          args:
            num_few_shot: 0
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 11.78
            name: acc_norm
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co./spaces/open-llm-leaderboard/open_llm_leaderboard?query=Pretergeek/OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: MMLU-PRO (5-shot)
          type: TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro
          config: main
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 25.44
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co./spaces/open-llm-leaderboard/open_llm_leaderboard?query=Pretergeek/OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard

Buy me a Ko-FiSupport my work using Patreon

OpenChat-3.5-0106_BlockExpansion-40Layers-End

This is NOT your usual frankenmerge created using mergekit.

Merge Details

Merge Method

This model was merged using the passthrough merge method, but employing a variation of the Block Expansion method described in the paper LLaMA Pro: Progressive LLaMA with Block Expansion.

The authors of the paper added new layers interleaved in between the original layers of the model, setting the parameters of the o_proj and down_proj layers to zero. This effectively adds layers that will just output their input (as if they were "transparent") allowing the model to remain functional even without further training. These new layers can then be targeted during training or fine-tuning without risking catastrophic forgetting, if you follow the author's training method to freeze the original layers and only train the new layers.

I used the same method but added the new layers to the end of the model. My rationale is that the level of abstraction increases with each layer of the model. So, while new layers spread along the original layers will help the model to learn new tasks, adding layers to the end of the model and then re-training/fine-tuning the model on tasks it already performs well could improve the models understanding of those task and perform them better by employing more complex reasoning.

This model has not yet received additional training, so it should perform close to the original model. Evaluations are pending and will be added when available.

Models Merged

The following models were included in the merge:

Configuration

The following YAML configuration was used to produce this model:

slices:
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [0, 32]
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
  - sources:
    - model: openchat/openchat-3.5-0106
      layer_range: [31, 32]
      parameters:
        scale:
          - filter: o_proj
            value: 0.0
          - filter: down_proj
            value: 0.0
          - value: 1.0
merge_method: passthrough
dtype: bfloat16

Citation

@misc{wu2024llamaproprogressivellama,
      title={LLaMA Pro: Progressive LLaMA with Block Expansion}, 
      author={Chengyue Wu and Yukang Gan and Yixiao Ge and Zeyu Lu and Jiahao Wang and Ye Feng and Ying Shan and Ping Luo},
      year={2024},
      eprint={2401.02415},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02415}, 
}

Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results

Detailed results can be found here

Metric Value
Avg. 22.55
IFEval (0-Shot) 59.61
BBH (3-Shot) 24.06
MATH Lvl 5 (4-Shot) 6.80
GPQA (0-shot) 7.61
MuSR (0-shot) 11.78
MMLU-PRO (5-shot) 25.44