LoneStriker/zephyr-7b-gemma-v0.1-6.0bpw-h6-exl2

Model Card for Zephyr 7B Gemma

Zephyr is a series of language models that are trained to act as helpful assistants. Zephyr 7B Gemma is the third model in the series, and is a fine-tuned version of google/gemma-7b that was trained on on a mix of publicly available, synthetic datasets using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). You can reproduce the training of this model via the recipe provided in the Alignment Handbook.

Model description

• Model type: A 7B parameter GPT-like model fine-tuned on a mix of publicly available, synthetic datasets.
• Language(s) (NLP): Primarily English
• License: Gemma Terms of Use
• Finetuned from model: google/gemma-7b

Model Sources

• Repository: https://github.com/huggingface/alignment-handbook
• Demo: https://huggingface.co./spaces/HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-gemma-chat

Performance

Model	MT Bench⬇️	IFEval
zephyr-7b-gemma-v0.1	7.81	28.76
zephyr-7b-beta	7.34	43.81
google/gemma-7b-it	6.38	38.01

Model	AGIEval	GPT4All	TruthfulQA	BigBench	Average ⬇️
zephyr-7b-beta	37.52	71.77	55.26	39.77	51.08
zephyr-7b-gemma-v0.1	34.22	66.37	52.19	37.10	47.47
mlabonne/Gemmalpaca-7B	21.6	40.87	44.85	30.49	34.45
google/gemma-7b-it	21.33	40.84	41.70	30.25	33.53

Details of AGIEval, GPT4All, TruthfulQA, BigBench

AGIEval

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
agieval_aqua_rat	0	acc	21.65	±	2.59
		acc_norm	25.20	±	2.73
agieval_logiqa_en	0	acc	34.72	±	1.87
		acc_norm	35.94	±	1.88
agieval_lsat_ar	0	acc	19.57	±	2.62
		acc_norm	21.74	±	2.73
agieval_lsat_lr	0	acc	30.59	±	2.04
		acc_norm	32.55	±	2.08
agieval_lsat_rc	0	acc	49.07	±	3.05
		acc_norm	42.75	±	3.02
agieval_sat_en	0	acc	54.85	±	3.48
		acc_norm	53.40	±	3.48
agieval_sat_en_without_passage	0	acc	37.38	±	3.38
		acc_norm	33.98	±	3.31
agieval_sat_math	0	acc	30.91	±	3.12
		acc_norm	28.18	±	3.04

Average: 34.22%

GPT4All

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
arc_challenge	0	acc	49.15	±	1.46
		acc_norm	52.47	±	1.46
arc_easy	0	acc	77.44	±	0.86
		acc_norm	74.75	±	0.89
boolq	1	acc	79.69	±	0.70
hellaswag	0	acc	60.59	±	0.49
		acc_norm	78.00	±	0.41
openbookqa	0	acc	29.20	±	2.04
		acc_norm	37.80	±	2.17
piqa	0	acc	76.82	±	0.98
		acc_norm	77.80	±	0.97
winogrande	0	acc	64.09	±	1.35

Average: 66.37%

TruthfulQA

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
truthfulqa_mc	1	mc1	35.74	±	1.68
		mc2	52.19	±	1.59

Average: 52.19%

Bigbench

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
bigbench_causal_judgement	0	multiple_choice_grade	53.68	±	3.63
bigbench_date_understanding	0	multiple_choice_grade	59.89	±	2.55
bigbench_disambiguation_qa	0	multiple_choice_grade	30.23	±	2.86
bigbench_geometric_shapes	0	multiple_choice_grade	11.42	±	1.68
		exact_str_match	0.00	±	0.00
bigbench_logical_deduction_five_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	28.40	±	2.02
bigbench_logical_deduction_seven_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	19.14	±	1.49
bigbench_logical_deduction_three_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	44.67	±	2.88
bigbench_movie_recommendation	0	multiple_choice_grade	26.80	±	1.98
bigbench_navigate	0	multiple_choice_grade	50.00	±	1.58
bigbench_reasoning_about_colored_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	52.75	±	1.12
bigbench_ruin_names	0	multiple_choice_grade	33.04	±	2.22
bigbench_salient_translation_error_detection	0	multiple_choice_grade	33.37	±	1.49
bigbench_snarks	0	multiple_choice_grade	48.62	±	3.73
bigbench_sports_understanding	0	multiple_choice_grade	58.11	±	1.57
bigbench_temporal_sequences	0	multiple_choice_grade	37.20	±	1.53
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	20.08	±	1.13
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	15.77	±	0.87
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	44.67	±	2.88

Average: 37.1%

Intended uses & limitations

The model was initially fine-tuned on the DEITA 10K dataset, which contains a diverse range of synthetic dialogues generated by ChatGPT. We then further aligned the model with 🤗 TRL's DPOTrainer on the argilla/dpo-mix-7k dataset, which contains 7k prompts and model completions that are ranked by GPT-4. As a result, the model can be used for chat and you can check out our demo to test its capabilities.

Here's how you can run the model using the pipeline() function from 🤗 Transformers:

# pip install transformers>=4.38.2
# pip install accelerate

import torch
from transformers import pipeline

pipe = pipeline(
    "text-generation",
    model="HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-gemma-v0.1",
    device_map="auto",
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
)
messages = [
    {
        "role": "system",
        "content": "",  # Model not yet trained for follow this
    },
    {"role": "user", "content": "How many helicopters can a human eat in one sitting?"},
]
outputs = pipe(
    messages,
    max_new_tokens=128,
    do_sample=True,
    temperature=0.7,
    top_k=50,
    top_p=0.95,
    stop_sequence="<|im_end|>",
)
print(outputs[0]["generated_text"][-1]["content"])
# It is not possible for a human to eat a helicopter in one sitting, as a
# helicopter is a large and inedible machine. Helicopters are made of metal,
# plastic, and other materials that are not meant to be consumed by humans.
# Eating a helicopter would be extremely dangerous and would likely cause
# serious health problems, including choking, suffocation, and poisoning. It is
# important to only eat food that is safe and intended for human consumption.

Bias, Risks, and Limitations

Zephyr 7B Gemma has not been aligned to human preferences for safety within the RLHF phase or deployed with in-the-loop filtering of responses like ChatGPT, so the model can produce problematic outputs (especially when prompted to do so). It is also unknown what the size and composition of the corpus was used to train the base model (google/gemma-7b), however it is likely to have included a mix of Web data and technical sources like books and code. See the StarCoder2 model card for an example of this.

Training and evaluation data

This model is a fine-tuned version of HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-gemma-sft-v0.1 on the argilla/dpo-mix-7k dataset.

It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:

• Loss: 0.4695
• Rewards/chosen: -3.3746
• Rewards/rejected: -4.9715
• Rewards/accuracies: 0.7188
• Rewards/margins: 1.5970
• Logps/rejected: -459.4853
• Logps/chosen: -429.9115
• Logits/rejected: 86.4684
• Logits/chosen: 92.8200

Training hyperparameters

The following hyperparameters were used during training:

• learning_rate: 5e-07
• train_batch_size: 2
• eval_batch_size: 4
• seed: 42
• distributed_type: multi-GPU
• num_devices: 8
• gradient_accumulation_steps: 8
• total_train_batch_size: 128
• total_eval_batch_size: 32
• optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08
• lr_scheduler_type: cosine
• lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.1
• num_epochs: 2

Training results

Training Loss	Epoch	Step	Validation Loss	Rewards/chosen	Rewards/rejected	Rewards/accuracies	Rewards/margins	Logps/rejected	Logps/chosen	Logits/rejected	Logits/chosen
0.1923	1.9	100	0.4736	-3.4575	-4.9556	0.75	1.4980	-459.1662	-431.5707	86.3863	92.7360

Framework versions

• Transformers 4.39.0.dev0
• Pytorch 2.1.2+cu121
• Datasets 2.14.6
• Tokenizers 0.15.1

Citation Information

If you find this model useful in your work, please consider citing the Zephyr technical report:

@misc{tunstall2023zephyr,
      title={Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment}, 
      author={Lewis Tunstall and Edward Beeching and Nathan Lambert and Nazneen Rajani and Kashif Rasul and Younes Belkada and Shengyi Huang and Leandro von Werra and Clémentine Fourrier and Nathan Habib and Nathan Sarrazin and Omar Sanseviero and Alexander M. Rush and Thomas Wolf},
      year={2023},
      eprint={2310.16944},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.LG}
}

You may also wish to cite the creators of this model as well:

@misc{zephyr_7b_gemma,
  author = {Lewis Tunstall and Philipp Schmid},
  title = {Zephyr 7B Gemma},
  year = {2024},
  publisher = {Hugging Face},
  journal = {Hugging Face repository},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co./HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-gemma-v0.1}}
}