Papers
arxiv:2411.02959

HtmlRAG: HTML is Better Than Plain Text for Modeling Retrieved Knowledge in RAG Systems

Published on Nov 5
· Submitted by zstanjj on Nov 6
#1 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been shown to improve knowledge capabilities and alleviate the hallucination problem of LLMs. The Web is a major source of external knowledge used in RAG systems, and many commercial systems such as ChatGPT and Perplexity have used Web search engines as their major retrieval systems. Typically, such RAG systems retrieve search results, download HTML sources of the results, and then extract plain texts from the HTML sources. Plain text documents or chunks are fed into the LLMs to augment the generation. However, much of the structural and semantic information inherent in HTML, such as headings and table structures, is lost during this plain-text-based RAG process. To alleviate this problem, we propose HtmlRAG, which uses HTML instead of plain text as the format of retrieved knowledge in RAG. We believe HTML is better than plain text in modeling knowledge in external documents, and most LLMs possess robust capacities to understand HTML. However, utilizing HTML presents new challenges. HTML contains additional content such as tags, JavaScript, and CSS specifications, which bring extra input tokens and noise to the RAG system. To address this issue, we propose HTML cleaning, compression, and pruning strategies, to shorten the HTML while minimizing the loss of information. Specifically, we design a two-step block-tree-based pruning method that prunes useless HTML blocks and keeps only the relevant part of the HTML. Experiments on six QA datasets confirm the superiority of using HTML in RAG systems.

Community

Paper submitter

HTML contains a lot of intrinsic information, so we propose taking HTML as the format of retrieved knowledge in RAG systems, and design HTML cleaning and block-tree-based HTML pruning to shorten the length and preserve information.

This is pretty much applying graph-rag to a processed html document (with extra steps) right?

·

In fact, HtmlRAG has nothing to do with Graph RAG😂. The tree structure in HtmlRAG originates from the HTML format, while the graph in graph RAG is extrated from plain-text documents using an LLM. There is almost no intersection between them. I hope this explanation could solve your concern🤗.

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 2

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2411.02959 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2411.02959 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 1