--- license: apache-2.0 tags: - Finance-sentiment-analysis - generated_from_trainer metrics: - f1 - accuracy - precision - recall model-index: - name: bert-base-finance-sentiment-noisy-search results: [] widget: - text: "Third quarter reported revenues were $10.9 billion, up 5 percent compared to prior year and up 8 percent on a currency-neutral basis" example_title: "Positive" - text: "The London-listed website for businesses reported a pretax loss of $26.6 million compared with a loss of $12.9 million the previous year" example_title: "Negative" - text: "Microsoft updates Outlook, Teams, and PowerPoint to be hybrid work ready" example_title: "Neutral" --- # bert-base-finance-sentiment-noisy-search This model is a fine-tuned version of [bert-base-uncased](https://huggingface.co./bert-base-uncased) on Kaggle finance news sentiment analysis with data enhancement using noisy search. The process is explained below: 1. First "bert-base-uncased" was fine-tuned on Kaggle's finance news sentiment analysis https://www.kaggle.com/ankurzing/sentiment-analysis-for-financial-news dataset achieving accuracy of about 88% 2. We then used a logistic-regression classifier on the same data. Here we looked at coefficients that contributed the most to the "Positive" and "Negative" classes by inspecting only bi-grams. 3. Using the top 25 bi-grams per class (i.e. "Positive" / "Negative") we invoked Bing news search with those bi-grams and retrieved up to 50 news items per bi-gram phrase. 4. We called it "noisy-search" because it is assumed the positive bi-grams (e.g. "profit rose" , "growth net") give rise to positive examples whereas negative bi-grams (e.g. "loss increase", "share loss") result in negative examples but note that we didn't test for the validity of this assumption (hence: noisy-search) 5. For each article we kept the title + excerpt and labeled it according to pre-assumptions on class associations. 6. We then trained the same model on the noisy data and apply it to an held-out test set from the original data set split. 7. Training with couple of thousands noisy "positives" and "negatives" examples yielded a test set accuracy of about 95%. 8. It shows that by automatically collecting noisy examples using search we can boost accuracy performance from about 88% to more than 95%. Accuracy results for Logistic Regression (LR) and BERT (base-cased) are shown in the attached pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MI9gRdppactVZ_XvhCwvoaOV1aRfprrd/view?usp=sharing ## Model description BERT model trained on noisy data from search results. See PDF for more details. ## Intended uses & limitations Intended for use on finance news sentiment analysis with 3 options: "Positive", "Neutral" and "Negative" To get the best results feed the classifier with the title and either the 1st paragraph or a short news summarization e.g. of up to 64 tokens. ### Training hyperparameters The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 8 - eval_batch_size: 8 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 5 ### Framework versions - Transformers 4.16.2 - Pytorch 1.10.0+cu111 - Datasets 1.18.3 - Tokenizers 0.11.0