--- license: llama2 library_name: peft tags: - typescript - instruction-tuning - code-generation - lora - peft base_model: codellama/CodeLlama-13b-hf model-index: - name: lora-out results: [] datasets: - mhhmm/typescript-instruct-20k language: - en metrics: - code_eval pipeline_tag: text-generation --- ## Architecture ![The Architecture](https://github.com/LeVuMinhHuy/brocode/blob/master/.pics/about-the-model.png?raw=true) ## About This model is a fine-tuned version of [codellama/CodeLlama-13b-hf](https://huggingface.co./codellama/CodeLlama-13b-hf). It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.4268 ### Training hyperparameters The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 0.0002 - train_batch_size: 8 - eval_batch_size: 8 - seed: 42 - distributed_type: multi-GPU - num_devices: 2 - total_train_batch_size: 16 - total_eval_batch_size: 16 - optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 - lr_scheduler_type: cosine - lr_scheduler_warmup_steps: 10 - num_epochs: 1 ### Training results | Training Loss | Epoch | Step | Validation Loss | |:-------------:|:-----:|:----:|:---------------:| | 0.7555 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.7062 | | 0.7036 | 0.05 | 7 | 0.6673 | | 0.5422 | 0.1 | 14 | 0.5152 | | 0.5351 | 0.15 | 21 | 0.4866 | | 0.495 | 0.2 | 28 | 0.4688 | | 0.5651 | 0.25 | 35 | 0.4587 | | 0.5146 | 0.3 | 42 | 0.4486 | | 0.4955 | 0.35 | 49 | 0.4469 | | 0.5117 | 0.4 | 56 | 0.4432 | | 0.5245 | 0.45 | 63 | 0.4410 | | 0.5003 | 0.5 | 70 | 0.4371 | | 0.4502 | 0.55 | 77 | 0.4340 | | 0.527 | 0.6 | 84 | 0.4315 | | 0.48 | 0.65 | 91 | 0.4305 | | 0.448 | 0.7 | 98 | 0.4289 | | 0.5427 | 0.75 | 105 | 0.4289 | | 0.4715 | 0.8 | 112 | 0.4279 | | 0.5584 | 0.85 | 119 | 0.4276 | | 0.4936 | 0.9 | 126 | 0.4267 | | 0.4788 | 0.95 | 133 | 0.4268 | | 0.476 | 1.0 | 140 | 0.4268 | ### Framework versions - Transformers 4.36.0.dev0 - Pytorch 2.0.1+cu118 - Datasets 2.15.0 - Tokenizers 0.15.0 - PEFT 0.6.0 ### Evaluation I'm using MultiPL-E benchmark, the same as Code Llmama using in their paper | Modal | Pass@k | Estimate | Num problems | |-----------------------------------------|--------|----------|---------------| | Code LLama - Instruct 13B | 1 | 39.0% | 159 | | Our 13B | 1 | 42.4% | 159 | How to reproduce my evaluation? Just run like the offical document of MultiPL-E: https://nuprl.github.io/MultiPL-E/tutorial.html, change the modal name by my model here: `mhhmm/typescript-instruct-20k-v2` This is the code that I ran with Google Colab (using A100 40GB, yes, it requires that much GPU RAM) If you even have a stronger GPU, increase the --batch-size, or --completion-limit ``` !pip install --upgrade pip !pip install aiohttp numpy tqdm pytest datasets torch transformers sentencepiece !git clone https://github.com/nuprl/MultiPL-E %cd MultiPL-E !mkdir typescript !python3 automodel.py --name mhhmm/typescript-instruct-20k-v2 --root-dataset humaneval --lang ts --temperature 0.2 --batch-size 10 --completion-limit 20 --output-dir-prefix typescript %cd evaluation/src !python3 main.py --dir ../../typescript --output-dir ../../typescript --recursive !python3 pass_k.py ./typescript/* ```