text "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total operating expenses in 2018 in millions Context: year the 2018 of gallons is 4447 ; the 2018 of average priceper gallon is $ 2.23 ; the 2018 of aircraft fuelexpense is $ 9896 ; the 2018 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 23.6% ( 23.6 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the total operating expenses is obtained by dividing the fuel expenses$ by the percent of operating expenses The required values from the context for the question are: Gallons in 2018: 4447 Average price per gallon in 2018: $2.23 Aircraft fuel expense in 2018: $9896 Percentage of total operating expenses in 2018: 23.6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 9896 by 23.6% which gives divide(9896, 23.6%), The final logic expression is divide(9896, 23.6%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of consolidated communities among the total communities? Context: multifamily the consolidated of communities is 303 ; the consolidated of units is 100595 ; multifamily the total of communities is 304 ; the total of units is 100864 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of consolidated communities divided by the total number of communities , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Consolidated communities: 303 Total communities: 304 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 303 by 304 which gives divide(303, 304) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(303, 304), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(303, 304), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total amount lost from the bond authorization to the withdrawn? Context: the franklin kentucky distribution center of bond term is 30 years ; the franklin kentucky distribution center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 54.0 ; the franklin kentucky distribution center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 51.8 ; the macon georgia distribution center of bond term is 15 years ; the macon georgia distribution center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 58.0 ; the macon georgia distribution center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 49.9 ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of bond term is 10 years ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 78.0 ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 75.3 ; the tax abatement plans provide for reduction of real property taxes for specified time frames by legally transferring title to its real property in exchange for industrial revenue bonds . the tax abatement period extends through the term of the lease , which coincides with the maturity date of the bonds . ### Output: Logic: to find out the amount of money lost we must compare the authorization to the withdraw of all 3 bonds . then once you find the difference of these bonds you will add together the differences to get $ 13 million The required values from the context for the question are: Franklin authorized: $54.0 million Franklin drawn: $51.8 million Macon authorized: $58.0 million Macon drawn: $49.9 million Brentwood authorized: $78.0 million Brentwood drawn: $75.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 51.8 from 54.0 which gives subtract(54.0, 51.8) step 2: subtract 75.3 from 78.0 which gives subtract(78.0, 75.3) step 3: subtract 49.9 from 58.0 which gives subtract(58.0, 49.9) step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9)) step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(subtract(54.0, 51.8), add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9))), The final logic expression is add(subtract(54.0, 51.8), add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9))). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the average revenue? Context: the 2016 of first quarter is 22% ( 22 % ) ; the 2016 of second quarter is 26% ( 26 % ) ; the 2016 of third quarter is 26% ( 26 % ) ; the 2016 of fourth quarter is 26% ( 26 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the revenue for all quarters , then divided by four . The required values from the context for the question are: Q1 2016: 22% Q2 2016: 26% Q3 2016: 26% Q4 2016: 26% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_average(2016, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(2016, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(2016, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31 , 2012 what was the percentage change in net reserves from 2011 Context: ( dollars in millions ) the net reserves of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 425.7 ; the net reserves of years ended december 31 , 2011 is $ 480.2 ; the net reserves of years ended december 31 , 2010 is $ 532.9 ; ### Output: Logic: to obtain the percent you get the change and divide it by the early amount The required values from the context for the question are: 2012 net reserves: $425.7 million 2011 net reserves: $480.2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 480.2 from 425.7 which gives subtract(425.7, 480.2) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 480.2 which gives divide(subtract(425.7, 480.2), 480.2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(425.7, 480.2), 480.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(425.7, 480.2), 480.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much of the cost of the acquisition was not goodwill and intangible assets? Context: the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . ### Output: Logic: to find the amount of money that was not included in the intangible assets and goodwill . we must take the purchase price and subtract the goodwill and intangible assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Purchase price: $34.6 million Intangible assets: $24.8 million Goodwill: $2.2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 24.8 from 34.6 which gives subtract(34.6, 24.8), The final logic expression is subtract(34.6, 24.8). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2006-2009 , what is the value of the average additions? Context: balance december 31 2006 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 740507 is 96454 ; balance december 31 2006 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 740507 is 101321 ; balance december 31 2006 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 740507 is 103.698 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the additions value divide by the sum of the years . The required values from the context for the question are: 2014 Additions: $96454, $101321, $103698 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 96454 to 101321 which gives add(96454, 101321) step 2: multiply const_1000 by 103.698 which gives multiply(const_1000, 103.698) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(96454, 101321), multiply(const_1000, 103.698)) step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(96454, 101321), multiply(const_1000, 103.698)), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(96454, 101321), multiply(const_1000, 103.698)), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2013-2014 period , what is the percentual improvement of net productivity and overall higher volumes concerning the atoi? Context: the atoi of 2015 is $ 166 ; the atoi of 2014 is $ 180 ; the atoi of 2013 is $ 167 ; atoi for this segment improved $ 13 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally attributable to net productivity improvements across all businesses and overall higher volumes , partially offset by unfavorable product mix and higher costs , primarily labor . ### Output: Logic: it is the value attributable to net productivity improvements and overall higher volumes divided by the total atoi in 2013 , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2014 ATOI: $180 2013 ATOI: $167 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 13 by 167 which gives divide(13, 167) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(13, 167), const_100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(13, 167), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(13, 167), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2018-2019 , what is the decrease observed in the pension expenses? Context: the pension expense including special items noted below of 2019 is $ 27.6 ; the pension expense including special items noted below of 2018 is $ 91.8 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those pension expenses values . The required values from the context for the question are: 2019 Pension Expense: $27.6 million 2018 Pension Expense: $91.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 27.6 from 91.8 which gives subtract(91.8, 27.6), The final logic expression is subtract(91.8, 27.6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2014 , how bigger were the number of dollars received from sales generated from firth rixson in comparison with tital? Context: in 2014 , tital generated sales of approximately $ 100 . firth rixson generated sales of approximately $ 970 in 2014 and had 13 operating facilities in the united states , united kingdom , europe , and asia employing approximately 2400 people combined . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual increase of the number of dollars received from firth rixson concerning tital.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Tital sales 2014: $100 Firth Rixson sales 2014: $970 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 970 by 100 which gives divide(970, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(970, 100), 100) step 3: subtract 100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(970, 100), 100), 100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(970, 100), 100), 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(970, 100), 100), 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how many segmented sales did the 5 largest customers account for in 2008? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 10086 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 9164 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . ### Output: Logic: the 5 largest customers accounted for $ 4236 million in 2008 . to figure this out you multiple the 2008 segmented sales by the percentage given in line 16 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2008 segment net sales: $10086 million 5 largest customers: 42% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10086 by 42% which gives multiply(10086, 42%), The final logic expression is multiply(10086, 42%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the amount of the first installment of the 19 billion 2015 term loan facility payable on june 27 , 2016 in billions Context: the 2013 credit facilities bear interest at an index rate plus an applicable index margin or , at american 2019s option , libor ( subject to a floor of 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) , with respect to the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility ) plus a libor margin of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) with respect to the 2013 revolving facility and 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) with respect to the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility ; provided that american 2019s corporate credit rating is ba3 or higher from moody 2019s and bb- or higher from s&p , the applicable libor margin would be 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan . the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility is repayable in annual installments , with the first installment in an amount equal to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of the principal amount commencing on june 27 , 2016 and installments thereafter , in an amount equal to 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) of the principal amount , with any unpaid balance due on the maturity date . ### Output: Logic: to obtain the amount of the fisrt installment multiply the loan amount by the amount of the % stated for the first installment The required values from the context for the question are: Loan amount: $1.9 billion First installment percent: 1.25% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1.9 by 1.25% which gives multiply(1.9, 1.25%), The final logic expression is multiply(1.9, 1.25%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the labor-related deemed claim to the total re-organization costs Context: the labor-related deemed claim ( 1 ) of 2013 is $ 1733 ; the total reorganization items net of 2013 is $ 2655 ; ### Output: Logic: the amount in question divide by the total amount time 100 The required values from the context for the question are: Labor-related claim 2013: $1733 Total reorganization items 2013: $2655 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1733 by 2655 which gives divide(1733, 2655) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1733, 2655), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1733, 2655), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest return for the first year of investment? Context: the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 140 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 176 ; the hum of 12/31/2016 is $ 202 ; the hum of 12/31/2017 is $ 247 ; the hum of 12/31/2018 is $ 287 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is $ 114 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is $ 115 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2016 is $ 129 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2017 is $ 157 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2018 is $ 150 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 128 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 135 ; the peer group of 12/31/2016 is $ 137 ; the peer group of 12/31/2017 is $ 173 ; the peer group of 12/31/2018 is $ 191 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value for the first year of the investment , then turned into a percentage to represent the return . The required values from the context for the question are: HUM 12/31/2013: $100 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 114 which gives subtract(114, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(114, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(114, 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the fluctuation of the credit spread in 2008 and 2009 , in basis points? Context: ( in millions ) the december 31 2009 of 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread is $ 39 ; ( in millions ) the december 31 2008 of 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread is $ 37 ; ### Output: Logic: its the percentual difference multiplied by the 100 basis points . The required values from the context for the question are: December 31 2009 change: $39 million December 31 2008 change: $37 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 39 by 37 which gives divide(39, 37) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(39, 37), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(39, 37), const_1), const_100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(39, 37), const_1), const_100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the amount of issued shares , in millions? Context: paymentdate the 2014 of amountper share is $ 1.10 ; the 2014 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 170 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of shares payment divided by the price per share to discover the number of shares issued and paid . The required values from the context for the question are: Amount per share 2014: $1.10 Total amount 2014: $170 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 170 by 1.10 which gives divide(170, 1.10), The final logic expression is divide(170, 1.10). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , how bigger is the growth of the third-party sales for the engineered products and solutions segment in comparison with the transportation and construction solutions one? Context: the third-party sales of 2016 is $ 1802 ; the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 1882 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 2021 ; third-party sales for the engineered products and solutions segment improved 7% ( 7 % ) in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily attributable to higher third-party sales of the two acquired businesses ( $ 457 ) , primarily related to the aerospace end market , and increased demand from the industrial gas turbine end market , partially offset by lower volumes in the oil and gas end market and commercial transportation end market as well as pricing pressures in aerospace . transportation and construction solutions . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the percentual variation of the third-party sales of both segments . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 Third-party sales: $1802 2015 Third-party sales: $1882 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1882 from 1802 which gives subtract(1802, 1882) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1882 which gives divide(subtract(1802, 1882), 1882) step 3: subtract the expression of step 2 from 7% which gives subtract(7%, divide(subtract(1802, 1882), 1882)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(7%, divide(subtract(1802, 1882), 1882)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(7%, divide(subtract(1802, 1882), 1882)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of year ended december 31 2008 what was the number of shares available for the basic earnings per share Context: the income from continuing operations available to common stockholders of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is 285.7 ; the income from continuing operations available to common stockholders of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is 423.2 ; the basic earnings per share of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is .76 ; the basic earnings per share of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is 1.10 ; ### Output: Logic: since the earnings per share is equal to the the income from operations divide by the number of shares The required values from the context for the question are: 2008 Income: 285.7 2008 Earnings per share: .76 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 285.7 by .76 which gives divide(285.7, .76), The final logic expression is divide(285.7, .76). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest return for the first year of the investment? Context: the hum of 12/31/2010 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2011 is $ 162 ; the hum of 12/31/2012 is $ 128 ; the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 195 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 274 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 343 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2010 is $ 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2011 is $ 102 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2012 is $ 118 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is $ 157 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is $ 178 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is $ 181 ; the peer group of 12/31/2010 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2011 is $ 110 ; the peer group of 12/31/2012 is $ 129 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 177 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 226 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 239 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the highest value of the investment , then turned into a percentage to represent the return . The required values from the context for the question are: HUM 12/31/2015: $343 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 162 which gives subtract(162, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(162, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(162, 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2013 what was the percent of the professional fees as part of the total re-organization costs Context: the professional fees of 2013 is 199 ; the total reorganization items net of 2013 is $ 2640 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the amount divided by the total amount multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: Professional fees 2013: $199 Total reorganization items 2013: $2640 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 199 by 2640 which gives divide(199, 2640) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(199, 2640), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(199, 2640), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated variation between the percentual decrease observed in the s&p 500 index and in the jpmorgan chase during the years 2017 and 2018? Context: december 31 ( in dollars ) the jpmorgan chase of 2013 is $ 100.00 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2014 is $ 109.88 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2015 is $ 119.07 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2016 is $ 160.23 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2017 is $ 203.07 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2018 is $ 189.57 ; december 31 ( in dollars ) the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 113.68 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 115.24 ; the s&p 500 index of 2016 is 129.02 ; the s&p 500 index of 2017 is 157.17 ; the s&p 500 index of 2018 is 150.27 ; the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the percentual variations of each indices during 2017 and 2018 . The required values from the context for the question are: jpmorgan chase value of 2017 = $ 203.07 jpmorgan chase value of 2018 = $ 189.57 s&p 500 index value of 2017 = 157.17 s&p 500 index value of 2018 = 150.27 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 150.27 by 157.17 which gives divide(150.27, 157.17) step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from const_1 which gives subtract(const_1, divide(150.27, 157.17)) step 3: divide 189.57 by 203.07 which gives divide(189.57, 203.07) step 4: subtract the expression of step 3 from const_1 which gives subtract(const_1, divide(189.57, 203.07)) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(const_1, divide(189.57, 203.07)), subtract(const_1, divide(150.27, 157.17))) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(const_1, divide(189.57, 203.07)), subtract(const_1, divide(150.27, 157.17))), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(const_1, divide(189.57, 203.07)), subtract(const_1, divide(150.27, 157.17))), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: at december 312011 what was the ratio of the unrecognized compensation expense associated of rsrs to the rpsrs Context: in addition , at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 19 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rsrs , which will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years ; $ 10 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the rpsrs converted as part of the spin-off , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of one year ; and $ 18 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rpsrs which will be recognized over a period of 2.0 years . ### Output: Logic: for every $ 1.9 of unrecognized compensation expense associated rsrs there was $ 1 The required values from the context for the question are: unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 RSRS = $ 19 million unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 RPSRS = $ 18 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 19 by const_10 which gives divide(19, const_10), The final logic expression is divide(19, const_10). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the amount of the decrease observed in the total net of cash collateral during 2017 and 2018 , in millions of dollars? Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the total net of cash collateral of 2018 is $ 54213 ; the total net of cash collateral of 2017 is $ 56523 ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the total net of cash collateral ( 56523 ) and ( 54213 ) in 2017 and 2018 , respectively . The required values from the context for the question are: total net of cash collateral of 2017 = $ 56523 total net of cash collateral of 2018 = $ 54213 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 54213 from 56523 which gives subtract(56523, 54213), The final logic expression is subtract(56523, 54213). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2014 what was the ratio of the decrease in tax positions compared to the end balance Context: balance at january 1 2012 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 21579 is -3176 ( 3176 ) ; balance at january 1 2012 the balance at december 31 2014 of $ 21579 is $ 10379 ; ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the decrease in 2014 as part of the end balance means divide the decease by the end balance The required values from the context for the question are: balance at January 1, 2012 = $ 21579 decreases in current period tax positions of 2012 = -3176 balance at December 31, 2014 = $ 10379 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 3176 by const_m1 which gives multiply(3176, const_m1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 10379 which gives divide(multiply(3176, const_m1), 10379) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(multiply(3176, const_m1), 10379), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(multiply(3176, const_m1), 10379), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of growth in maturities from 2009 to 2010 Context: 2007 the 2010 of $ 130206 is 265915 ; 2007 the 2009 of $ 130206 is 372725 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divided by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: value for 2010 = 265915 value for 2009 = 372725 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 372725 from 265915 which gives subtract(265915, 372725) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 265915 which gives divide(subtract(265915, 372725), 265915) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(265915, 372725), 265915), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(265915, 372725), 265915), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much has the balance changed from 2013 to 2015? Context: changes to our valuation allowance during the years ended may 31 , 2015 and 2014 are summarized below ( in thousands ) : . balance at may 31 2013 the balance at may 31 2013 of $ -28464 ( 28464 ) is $ -28464 ( 28464 ) ; balance at may 31 2013 the balance at may 31 2015 of $ -28464 ( 28464 ) is $ -3823 ( 3823 ) ; ### Output: Logic: to calculate the change in balance from 2013 to 2015 we must subtract the 2013 balance from the 2015 balance ( it is a lot easier if one leaves the two numbers positive ) . this difference if left positive is the increase in the balance . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance at May 31, 2013 = -$28464 Balance at May 31, 2015 = -$3823 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3823 from 28464 which gives subtract(28464, 3823), The final logic expression is subtract(28464, 3823). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the eog's roll forward of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets during 2015-2017 , what was the highest value registered in the beginning balance? Context: the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 383221 ; the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 506127 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 463018 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of this period . The required values from the context for the question are: Beginning balance of 2017 = $383221 Beginning balance of 2016 = $506127 Beginning balance of 2015 = $463018 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(beginning balance, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is average of the debt maturities that will occur in the period from 2006 to 2010 in millions Context: the total of total ( in$ millions ) is 3437 ; the thereafter ( 1 ) of total ( in$ millions ) is 3163 ; ### Output: Logic: the average is the the sum of the amounts divided by the number of periods The required values from the context for the question are: Total = $3437 Thereafter (1) = $3163 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3163 from 3437 which gives subtract(3437, 3163) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_5 which gives divide(subtract(3437, 3163), const_5), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(3437, 3163), const_5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what is variation observed in the number of stocks that were excluded , in millions? Context: for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , 4.5 million and 5.3 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between each year's number of excluded stocks . The required values from the context for the question are: Shares excluded in 2016 = 4.5 million Shares excluded in 2015 = 5.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4.5 from 5.3 which gives subtract(5.3, 4.5), The final logic expression is subtract(5.3, 4.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual amount represented by cash performance bonds and cash guaranty fund contributions in the total figure of 2010 , in millions? Context: ( in millions ) the cash performance bonds of 2010 is $ 3717.0 ; the cash performance bonds of 2009 is $ 5834.6 ; ( in millions ) the cash guaranty fund contributions of 2010 is 231.8 ; the cash guaranty fund contributions of 2009 is 102.6 ; ( in millions ) the cross-margin arrangements of 2010 is 79.7 ; the cross-margin arrangements of 2009 is 10.6 ; ( in millions ) the total of 2010 is $ 4038.5 ; the total of 2009 is $ 5981.9 ; ### Output: Logic: its the sum of the cash performance bonds and cash guaranty fund contributions divided by the total of 2010 . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash performance bonds 2010 = $3717.0 Cash performance bonds 2009 = $5834.6 Cash guaranty fund contributions 2010 = $231.8 Cash guaranty fund contributions 2009 = $102.6 Cross-margin arrangements 2010 = $79.7 Cross-margin arrangements 2009 = $10.6 Total 2010 = $4038.5 Total 2009 = $5981.9 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 3717.0 to 231.8 which gives add(3717.0, 231.8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 4038.5 which gives divide(add(3717.0, 231.8), 4038.5) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(3717.0, 231.8), 4038.5), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(3717.0, 231.8), 4038.5), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the international projected benefit payments , what is the average yearly projection of the 2025-2029 period? Context: the 2025-2029 of u.s . is 919.9 ; the 2025-2029 of international is 308.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all projected benefit payments during 2025-2029 divided by 5 ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2025-2029 of U.S. = 919.9 2025-2029 of International = 308.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 308.3 by const_5 which gives divide(308.3, const_5), The final logic expression is divide(308.3, const_5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation of the adjusted effective tax rate considering the years 2018-2019? Context: the adjusted effective tax rate was 19.4% ( 19.4 % ) and 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those adjusted effective tax rates during these years . The required values from the context for the question are: Adjusted effective tax rate 2019 = 19.4% Adjusted effective tax rate 2018 = 18.6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 18.6% from 19.4% which gives subtract(19.4%, 18.6%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(19.4%, 18.6%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(19.4%, 18.6%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans? Context: the fully-insured of smart plans and other consumer membership is 327900 ; the fully-insured of other commercial membership is 1480700 ; the fully-insured of commercial medical membership is 1808600 ; the total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership is 564700 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2886900 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3451600 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of members of the fully insured plans divided by the total number of members of the commercial medical plans . The required values from the context for the question are: Fully-insured smart plans = 327900 Fully-insured other commercial = 1480700 Fully-insured commercial medical = 1808600 Total commercial medical smart plans = 564700 Total commercial medical other commercial = 2886900 Total commercial medical commercial medical = 3451600 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 327900 by 564700 which gives divide(327900, 564700) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(327900, 564700), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(327900, 564700), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: did consolidated net sales grow from 2007 to 2009 and what was this growth in a percentage? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 is $ 7008 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 8093 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 20142008 is ( 13 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2008 20142007 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 32% ( 32 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2008 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 . ### Output: Logic: in order to find out the consolidated net sales one must multiple the segmented net sales by the percentage given in line 7 . we then subtract the two numbers and take the answer and divide by the lower number . this gives us 38.2% . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment net sales 2009 = $7008 Segment net sales 2008 = $8093 Segment net sales 2007 = $7729 Segment net sales percentage change 2009-2008 = (13)% Segment net sales percentage change 2008-2007 = 5% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 7729 by 21% which gives multiply(7729, 21%) step 2: multiply 7008 by 32% which gives multiply(7008, 32%) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%)) step 4: multiply 7729 by 21% which gives multiply(7729, 21%) step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%)), multiply(7729, 21%)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%)), multiply(7729, 21%)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%)), multiply(7729, 21%)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how bigger are the additions in comparison with the deductions during 2009? Context: balance december 31 2007 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 756703 is 103698 ; balance december 31 2007 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 756703 is -11869 ( 11869 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the additions divided by the deductions then multiplied by 100 and then turned into a correct percentage by subtracting 100% . The required values from the context for the question are: Additions during period 2014 = 103698 Deductions during period 2014 = -11869 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 103698 by 11869 which gives divide(103698, 11869) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(103698, 11869), const_100) step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(103698, 11869), const_100), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(103698, 11869), const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(103698, 11869), const_100), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of assets are definitive net assets? Context: cash and cash equivalents the identified intangible assets of $ 7540 is 188294 ; cash and cash equivalents the total identifiable net assets of $ 7540 is 144357 ; cash and cash equivalents the goodwill of $ 7540 is 264844 ; as of december 31 , 2018 , we considered these balances to be provisional because we were still in the process of determining the final purchase consideration , which is subject to adjustment pursuant to the purchase agreement , and gathering and reviewing information to support the valuations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed . goodwill arising from the acquisition of $ 264.8 million , included in the north america segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities , an assembled workforce and potential synergies from combining our existing businesses . ### Output: Logic: the assets that are definitive are tangible therefore goodwill and intangible assets are not considered definitive assets . therefore to figure out the percentage of definitive assets , one must added up all the assets and divide the tangible assets by the total assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Identified intangible assets = 188294 Total identifiable net assets = 144357 Goodwill = 264844 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 264844 to 188294 which gives add(264844, 188294) step 2: add 144357 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(144357, add(264844, 188294)) step 3: divide 144357 by the expression of step 2 which gives divide(144357, add(144357, add(264844, 188294))) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(144357, add(144357, add(264844, 188294))), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(144357, add(144357, add(264844, 188294))), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the aggerate net sales in 2008? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 is $ 7963 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 10086 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 20142008 is ( 21 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2008 20142007 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; in 2008 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 41% ( 41 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . ### Output: Logic: in line 4 , it states that the aggerate net sales for 2008 was 41% of the segment net sales . therefore to calculate aggerate net sales , you much multiple segment net sales by 41% . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment net sales 2009 = $7963 Segment net sales 2008 = $10086 Segment net sales 2007 = $10014 Segment net sales percentage change 2009-2008 = (21)% Segment net sales percentage change 2008-2007 = 1% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10086 by 41% which gives multiply(10086, 41%), The final logic expression is multiply(10086, 41%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the rate of the income tax benefit based on the stock compensation Context: the stock-based compensation of 2015 is 11 ; the stock-based compensation of 2014 is 13 ; the stock-based compensation of 2013 is 13 ; ### Output: Logic: the rate of the benefit is equal to the tax benefit divide by the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: Stock-based compensation 2015 = 11 Stock-based compensation 2014 = 13 Stock-based compensation 2013 = 13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide const_4 by 11 which gives divide(const_4, 11) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(const_4, 11), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(const_4, 11), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage has liquidity dropped from 2012 to 2013? Context: balance sheet data the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2013 is $ 1642.1 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2012 is $ 2590.8 ; liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . ### Output: Logic: to find out how much the liquidity has dropped from 2012 to 2013 you take 2013 number and divide it by 2012 to get 63.4% . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash and equivalents 2013 = $1642.1 Cash and equivalents 2012 = $2590.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1642.1 by 2590.8 which gives divide(1642.1, 2590.8) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1642.1, 2590.8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1642.1, 2590.8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2009-2010 , what is the increase in the final balance? Context: balance december 31 2007 the balance december 31 2009 of $ 756703 is 938087 ; balance december 31 2007 the balance december 31 2010 of $ 756703 is $ 1035204 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the balance at 2010 divided by the one at 2009 , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance 2009 = 938087 Balance 2010 = $1035204 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1035204 by 938087 which gives divide(1035204, 938087) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1035204, 938087), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1035204, 938087), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1035204, 938087), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of software and other intangible assets in the transportation and construction solutions segment , in years? Context: the transportation and construction solutions of software is 5 ; the transportation and construction solutions of other intangible assets is 16 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of years . The required values from the context for the question are: Software years = 5 Other intangible assets years = 16 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5 from 16 which gives subtract(16, 5), The final logic expression is subtract(16, 5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the ratio of long term debt to the total contractual obligations Context: ( $ in millions ) the long-term debt of total is $ 1859 ; the long-term debt of 2012 is $ 29 ; the long-term debt of 2013 - 2014 is $ 129 ; the long-term debt of 2015 - 2016 is $ 396 ; the long-term debt of 2017 and beyond is $ 1305 ; ( $ in millions ) the total contractual obligations of total is $ 5849 ; the total contractual obligations of 2012 is $ 1637 ; the total contractual obligations of 2013 - 2014 is $ 1239 ; the total contractual obligations of 2015 - 2016 is $ 897 ; the total contractual obligations of 2017 and beyond is $ 2076 ; ### Output: Logic: every $ 1 of total contractual obligations includes $ 0.32 of long term debt The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt total = $1859 Total contractual obligations total = $5849 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1859 by 5849 which gives divide(1859, 5849), The final logic expression is divide(1859, 5849). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the approximate number of vehicle in the fleet that are operating on compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 12% ( 12 % ) Context: the total of approximate number of vehicles is 15500 ; the total of average age is 7 ; fleet automation approximately 66% ( 66 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 12% ( 12 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas . ### Output: Logic: to obtain the number multiply the amount by the percent The required values from the context for the question are: Total number of vehicles = 15500 Residential routes automation = 66% Fleet conversion to CNG = 12% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 15500 by 12% which gives multiply(15500, 12%), The final logic expression is multiply(15500, 12%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009? Context: 2008 the 2009 of $ 317 is 275 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: 2009 value = 275 2008 value = 317 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 317 from 275 which gives subtract(275, 317), The final logic expression is subtract(275, 317). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the growth observed in the benefit payments during 2011 and 2012? Context: the 2011 of benefit payments is 3028 ; the 2011 of expected subsidy receipts is 91 ; the 2011 of net benefit payments is 2937 ; the 2012 of benefit payments is 3369 ; the 2012 of expected subsidy receipts is 111 ; the 2012 of net benefit payments is 3258 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of benefit payments in 2012 divided by the 2011's , then transformed into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Benefit payments 2011 = 3028 Benefit payments 2012 = 3369 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 3369 by 3028 which gives divide(3369, 3028) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(3369, 3028), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(3369, 3028), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(3369, 3028), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the residential vehicles as part of the fleet Context: the residential of approximate number of vehicles is 7600 ; the residential of approximate average age is 7 ; the total of approximate number of vehicles is 15800 ; the total of approximate average age is 7.5 ; ### Output: Logic: to get the percent of the residential you divide the residential by the total The required values from the context for the question are: Residential number of vehicles = 7600 Total number of vehicles = 15800 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 7600 by 15800 which gives divide(7600, 15800) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(7600, 15800), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(7600, 15800), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of property and equipment and other assets among the total assets? Context: the cash and cash equivalents of ( in thousands ) is $ 15270 ; the investment securities of ( in thousands ) is 84527 ; the premiums receivable and other current assets of ( in thousands ) is 20616 ; the property and equipment and other assets of ( in thousands ) is 6847 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of property and equipment and other assets divided by the total assets , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash and cash equivalents = $15270 Property and equipment and other assets = 6847 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 15270 to 84527 which gives add(15270, 84527) step 2: add 20616 to 6847 which gives add(20616, 6847) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(15270, 84527), add(20616, 6847)) step 4: divide 6847 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(6847, add(add(15270, 84527), add(20616, 6847))) step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(6847, add(add(15270, 84527), add(20616, 6847))), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(6847, add(add(15270, 84527), add(20616, 6847))), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of assets for the acquisition of paypros was deductible for taxes? Context: goodwill the customer-related intangible assets of $ 271577 is 147500 ; goodwill the contract-based intangible assets of $ 271577 is 31000 ; goodwill the acquired technology of $ 271577 is 10700 ; goodwill the fixed assets of $ 271577 is 1680 ; goodwill the other assets of $ 271577 is 4230 ; goodwill the total assets acquired of $ 271577 is 466687 ; the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of assets that are tax deductible one will nee to added all the intangible assets and technology acquisitions . then they will divide that answer by the total amount of assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Customer-related intangible assets = 147500 Contract-based intangible assets = 31000 Acquired technology = 10700 Total assets acquired = 466687 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 10700 to 31000 which gives add(10700, 31000) step 2: add 147500 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(147500, add(10700, 31000)) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 466687 which gives divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the percentage of intersegment sales concerning total sales? Context: the intersegment sales of 2015 is 125 ; the intersegment sales of 2014 is 185 ; the intersegment sales of 2013 is 178 ; the total sales of 2015 is $ 6363 ; the total sales of 2014 is $ 7536 ; the total sales of 2013 is $ 7284 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the total of dollars brought by the intersegment sales divided by the total of dollars associated with total sales . The required values from the context for the question are: Intersegment sales 2015 = 125 Total sales 2015 = $6363 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 185 by 7536 which gives divide(185, 7536) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(185, 7536), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(185, 7536), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2009 to 2010 Context: in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference from year to year divide by the earlier year balance The required values from the context for the question are: Cash dividends 2011 = $78 million Cash dividends 2010 = $71 million Cash dividends 2009 = $56 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 56 from 71 which gives subtract(71, 56) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 56 which gives divide(subtract(71, 56), 56) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(71, 56), 56), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(71, 56), 56), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the ratio of the changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures in 2016 to 2015 Context: cash flows provided by operating activities the most significant items affecting the comparison of our operating cash flows for 2016 and 2015 are summarized below : changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures , decreased our cash flow from operations by $ 205.2 million in 2016 , compared to a decrease of $ 316.7 million in 2015 , primarily as a result of the following : 2022 our accounts receivable , exclusive of the change in allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , increased $ 52.3 million during 2016 due to the timing of billings net of collections , compared to a $ 15.7 million increase in 2015 . ### Output: Logic: for every dollar in 2015 of changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures there was $ 0.67 in 2016 The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 changes in assets and liabilities = $316.7 million 2016 changes in assets and liabilities = $205.2 million 2016 for every 2015 dollar = $0.67 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 205.2 by 316.7 which gives divide(205.2, 316.7), The final logic expression is divide(205.2, 316.7). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the net income in 2016? Context: ( in millions ) the operating income ( 1 ) of gaap 2016 is $ 4570 ; the operating income ( 1 ) of gaap 2015 is $ 4664 ; the operating income ( 1 ) of gaap 2014 is $ 4474 ; the operating income ( 1 ) of gaap 2016 is $ 4674 ; the operating income ( 1 ) of gaap 2015 is $ 4695 ; the operating income ( 1 ) of 2014 is $ 4563 ; ( in millions ) the income tax expense of gaap 2016 is $ 1290 ; the income tax expense of gaap 2015 is $ 1250 ; the income tax expense of gaap 2014 is $ 1131 ; the income tax expense of gaap 2016 is $ 1352 ; the income tax expense of gaap 2015 is $ 1312 ; the income tax expense of 2014 is $ 1197 ; income tax expense . ### Output: Logic: operating income - income tax expense = net income The required values from the context for the question are: Operating income 2016 (GAAP) = $4570 million Operating income 2015 (GAAP) = $4664 million Operating income 2014 (GAAP) = $4474 million Income tax expense 2016 (GAAP) = $1290 million Income tax expense 2015 (GAAP) = $1250 million Income tax expense 2014 (GAAP) = $1131 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1290 from 4570 which gives subtract(4570, 1290), The final logic expression is subtract(4570, 1290). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of the assets , purchased in the acquisition , are tangible? Context: goodwill the customer-related intangible assets of $ 6286 is 3248 ; goodwill the contract-based intangible assets of $ 6286 is 952 ; money transfer branch locations during 2009 , we completed the second and final series of money transfer branch location acquisitions in the united states as part of an assignment and asset purchase agreement with a privately held company . goodwill the property and equipment of $ 6286 is 300 ; goodwill the total assets acquired of $ 6286 is 11010 ; ### Output: Logic: tangible assets do not include goodwill , nontangible assets , and trademark . therefore we must divide equipment by total assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Customer-related intangible assets = $3248 Contract-based intangible assets = $952 Property and equipment = $300 Total assets acquired = $11010 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 300 to 11010 which gives add(300, 11010) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(add(300, 11010), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(300, 11010), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage that net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased from 2008 to 2009? Context: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . ### Output: Logic: to find the answer one must subtract the totals of the two years and then take that answer and divide it by the total for 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: Net income increase 2008 = $28.9 million Net income 2008 = $8.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 8.1 from 28.9 which gives subtract(28.9, 8.1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 8.1 which gives divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: on december 31 , 2017 what is the estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to the non vested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized as of december 31 , 2018 in millions Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . ### Output: Logic: the of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized is 6 millon to be recognized over 1.5 years , thus the annual amount is equal to 6/1.5=4 The required values from the context for the question are: Unrecognized compensation cost = $6 million Time period = 1.5 years Annual amount = $4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide const_6 by 1.5 which gives divide(const_6, 1.5), The final logic expression is divide(const_6, 1.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2010 to 2011 Context: in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference from year to year divide by the earlier year balance The required values from the context for the question are: Cash dividends 2011 = $78 million Cash dividends 2010 = $71 million Cash dividends 2009 = $56 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 71 from 78 which gives subtract(78, 71) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 71 which gives divide(subtract(78, 71), 71) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(78, 71), 71), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(78, 71), 71), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012-2013 , what is the increase observed in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans? Context: during 2013 and 2012 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 300.8 and $ 76.4 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the 2013 value divided by the 2012's , then turned into a percentage and subtracted 100% . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash contributions 2013 = $300.8 million Cash contributions 2012 = $76.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 300.8 by 76.4 which gives divide(300.8, 76.4) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), const_100) step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), const_100), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), const_100), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total amount of principle payment paid from 2008 to 2011? Context: the term loan calls for quarterly principal payments of $ 5 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2008 and increasing to $ 10 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2010 and $ 15 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2011 . ### Output: Logic: to find the total amount of payments one must check line 7 and added up all the years from 2008 to 2011 . The required values from the context for the question are: Principal payments 2008 = $5 million Principal payments 2010 = $10 million Principal payments 2011 = $15 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10) step 2: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)), The final logic expression is add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the average risk-free rate? Context: the risk free rate of 2018 is 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) ; the risk free rate of 2017 is 0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % ) ; the risk free rate of 2016 is 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the low and high risk-free rates divided by two to represent the average . The required values from the context for the question are: Risk-free rate 2018 = 1.61% - 2.14% Risk-free rate 2017 = 0.65% - 1.57% Risk-free rate 2016 = 0.49% - 1.27% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1.61% to 2.14% which gives add(1.61%, 2.14%) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(1.61%, 2.14%), const_2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(1.61%, 2.14%), const_2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(1.61%, 2.14%), const_2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent cash and equivalents did the interest income generated during 2015? Context: we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase in the interest income for 2015 , one must take the total cash and equivalents and subtract it by the interest income for 2015 , then take that solution and divide it by the cash and equivalents . then subtract 1 by the answer . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash and equivalents 2016 = $1100.6 million Interest income 2016 = $20.1 million Interest income 2015 = $22.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 22.8 from 1100.6 which gives subtract(1100.6, 22.8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1100.6 which gives divide(subtract(1100.6, 22.8), 1100.6) step 3: subtract the expression of step 2 from const_1 which gives subtract(const_1, divide(subtract(1100.6, 22.8), 1100.6)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(const_1, divide(subtract(1100.6, 22.8), 1100.6)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(const_1, divide(subtract(1100.6, 22.8), 1100.6)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: non cash expense are what percent of total operating expense in 2014? Context: millions the depreciation of 2014 is 1904 ; the depreciation of 2013 is 1777 ; the depreciation of 2012 is 1760 ; the depreciation of % ( % ) change 2014 v 2013 is 7 ; the depreciation of % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 is 1 ; millions the total of 2014 is $ 15235 ; the total of 2013 is $ 14517 ; the total of 2012 is $ 14181 ; the total of % ( % ) change 2014 v 2013 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the total of % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 is 2% ( 2 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: depreciation - non cash The required values from the context for the question are: Depreciation 2014 = 1904 Depreciation 2013 = 1777 Depreciation 2012 = 1760 Total 2014 = $15235 Total 2013 = $14517 Total 2012 = $14181 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1904 by 15235 which gives divide(1904, 15235) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1904, 15235), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1904, 15235), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: at december 312008 what was the total liabilities acquired for this plan in millions Context: liabilities acquired for this plan were $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , at the acquisition date and at december 31 , 2008 . ### Output: Logic: the total liabilities is the sum of the amounts as shown above The required values from the context for the question are: Liabilities acquired 2008 = $1.2 million Liabilities December 31, 2008 = $1.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1.3 to 1.2 which gives add(1.3, 1.2), The final logic expression is add(1.3, 1.2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the rate of growth from 2013 to 2014 in the fair value per share Context: the grant date fair value per share of 2015 is $ 62.10 ; the grant date fair value per share of 2014 is $ 45.45 ; the grant date fair value per share of 2013 is $ 40.13 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate of the fair value per share is the change from period to period divide by the base period The required values from the context for the question are: Fair value 2015 = $62.10 Fair value 2014 = $45.45 Fair value 2013 = $40.13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 40.13 from 45.45 which gives subtract(45.45, 40.13) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 40.13 which gives divide(subtract(45.45, 40.13), 40.13) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(45.45, 40.13), 40.13), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(45.45, 40.13), 40.13), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for the year ended december 312011 what was the percent of the incurred but not reported reserves as part of the total Context: ( dollars in millions ) the incurred but not reported reserves of years ended december 31 , 2012 is 177.1 ; the incurred but not reported reserves of years ended december 31 , 2011 is 210.9 ; the incurred but not reported reserves of years ended december 31 , 2010 is 264.4 ; ( dollars in millions ) the net reserves of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 425.7 ; the net reserves of years ended december 31 , 2011 is $ 480.2 ; the net reserves of years ended december 31 , 2010 is $ 532.9 ; ### Output: Logic: to get the percent you divide the amount by the total The required values from the context for the question are: Incurred but not reported reserves 2012 = 177.1 Incurred but not reported reserves 2011 = 210.9 Incurred but not reported reserves 2010 = 264.4 Net reserves 2012 = $425.7 million Net reserves 2011 = $480.2 million Net reserves 2010 = $532.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 210.9 by 480.2 which gives divide(210.9, 480.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(210.9, 480.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(210.9, 480.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the percentual decrease of the large market same-store and the secondary market same-store during 2014 and 2015? Context: the large market same store of year ended december 31 2015 is $ 168872 ; the large market same store of year ended december 31 2014 is $ 174957 ; the large market same store of increase is $ -6085 ( 6085 ) ; the large market same store of percentage increase is ( 3.5 ) % ( % ) ; the secondary market same store of year ended december 31 2015 is 85008 ; the secondary market same store of year ended december 31 2014 is 86058 ; the secondary market same store of increase is -1050 ( 1050 ) ; the secondary market same store of percentage increase is ( 1.2 ) % ( % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those percentages . The required values from the context for the question are: Large market 2015 = $168872 Large market 2014 = $174957 Secondary market 2015 = 85008 Secondary market 2014 = 86058 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1.2 from 3.5 which gives subtract(3.5, 1.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(3.5, 1.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(3.5, 1.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the change in percentage of consolidated net sales from 2006 to 2008? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 10086 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 9164 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ### Output: Logic: the consolidated net sales grew 72.95% from 2006 to 2008 . to get this answer you must find out the consolidated net sales which was given in line 23 . then you must take this consolidated net sales and subtract them from each other . take this answer and divide it by the consolidated net sales for 2006 . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment net sales 2008 = $10086 million Segment net sales 2007 = $10014 million Segment net sales 2006 = $9164 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 9164 by 21% which gives multiply(9164, 21%) step 2: multiply 10086 by 33% which gives multiply(10086, 33%) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(10086, 33%), multiply(9164, 21%)) step 4: multiply 9164 by 21% which gives multiply(9164, 21%) step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(10086, 33%), multiply(9164, 21%)), multiply(9164, 21%)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(10086, 33%), multiply(9164, 21%)), multiply(9164, 21%)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(10086, 33%), multiply(9164, 21%)), multiply(9164, 21%)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the research and development costs from 2015 to 2016 Context: research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the percent is the difference in the amounts divided by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: R&D expense 2017 = $72 million R&D expense 2016 = $78 million R&D expense 2015 = $119 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 119 from 78 which gives subtract(78, 119) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 119 which gives divide(subtract(78, 119), 119) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(78, 119), 119), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(78, 119), 119), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the accrued balance for interest and penalties during 2015 and 2016? Context: our accrued balance for interest and penalties was $ 9.8 and $ 7.5 as of 30 september 2016 and 2015 , respectively. . ### Output: Logic: it is the 2016 value for the accrued balance for interest and penalties divided by the 2015's then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Accrued balance interest and penalties 2016 = $9.8 million Accrued balance interest and penalties 2015 = $7.5 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 9.8 by 7.5 which gives divide(9.8, 7.5) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(9.8, 7.5), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(9.8, 7.5), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(9.8, 7.5), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the short-term debt as a percent of total debt , in 2019? Context: 30 september the short-term borrowings of 2019 is $ 58.2 ; the short-term borrowings of 2018 is $ 54.3 ; 30 september the total debt of 2019 is $ 3326.0 ; the total debt of 2018 is $ 3812.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the short-term debt divided by the total debt , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Short-term borrowings 2019 = $58.2 million Short-term borrowings 2018 = $54.3 million Total debt 2019 = $3326.0 million Total debt 2018 = $3812.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 58.2 by 3326.0 which gives divide(58.2, 3326.0) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(58.2, 3326.0), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(58.2, 3326.0), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of operating leases among the total future minimum payments , in 2010? Context: the 2010 of total is $ 283987 ; the 2010 of capital leases is $ 7260 ; the 2010 of operating leases is $ 25978 ; the 2010 of sponsorship licensing & other is $ 250749 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value related to operating leases divided by the total value of future minimum payments in 2010 , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Total 2010 = $283987 Capital leases 2010 = $7260 Operating leases 2010 = $25978 Sponsorship licensing & other 2010 = $250749 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 25978 by 283987 which gives divide(25978, 283987) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(25978, 283987), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(25978, 283987), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the anticipated cash dividend for each quarter in millions Context: based on the number of outstanding shares of our series a common stock , the anticipated annual cash dividend is approximately $ 25 million . ### Output: Logic: the quarterly dividend you divide the annual by 4 The required values from the context for the question are: Anticipated annual dividend = $25 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 25 by const_4 which gives divide(25, const_4), The final logic expression is divide(25, const_4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total equity compensation plans approved by stockholders as of december 312006 Context: plan category the equity compensation plans approved by stockholders ( 1 ) of ( a ) number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants andrights is 1118051 ; the equity compensation plans approved by stockholders ( 1 ) of ( b ) weighted average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights is $ 24.27 ; the equity compensation plans approved by stockholders ( 1 ) of ( c ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) is 8373727 ; ### Output: Logic: the total equity compensation plans approved by stockholders is the sum of the approved amount and remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans The required values from the context for the question are: Number of securities for exercise = 1118051 Weighted average exercise price = $24.27 Securities available for future issuance = 8373727 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1118051 to 8373727 which gives add(1118051, 8373727), The final logic expression is add(1118051, 8373727). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of the total purchase consideration is comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangibles assets acquired? Context: the goodwill of ( in thousands ) is 247482 ; the identifiable intangibles assets acquired of ( in thousands ) is 108867 ; the total purchase allocation of ( in thousands ) is $ 416956 ; ### Output: Logic: this figure give the percentage paid for soft assets . those that are hard to value . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill = 247482 Identifiable intangibles assets = 108867 Total purchase allocation = $416956 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 247482 to 108867 which gives add(247482, 108867) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 416956 which gives divide(add(247482, 108867), 416956) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(247482, 108867), 416956), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(247482, 108867), 416956), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: approximately how many shares can be purchased with the maximum amount given for the period between 10/2/05 and 10/29/05 , given the same average share price? Context: period the 10/2/05 to 10/29/05 of ( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) is 5506400 ; the 10/2/05 to 10/29/05 of ( b ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) ( 3 ) is $ 21.16 ; the 10/2/05 to 10/29/05 of ( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) is 5506400 ; the 10/2/05 to 10/29/05 of ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) is $ 3367111278 ; ### Output: Logic: maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs divided by the average price estimates the number of shares that can still be purchased The required values from the context for the question are: Total shares purchased 10/2/05 to 10/29/05 = 5506400 Average price per share = $21.16 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 3367111278 by 21.16 which gives divide(3367111278, 21.16), The final logic expression is divide(3367111278, 21.16). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average value of operating leases during 2010-2014? Context: the total of total is $ 638035 ; the total of capital leases is $ 51774 ; the total of operating leases is $ 100557 ; the total of sponsorship licensing & other is $ 485704 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all operating leases during this period divided by six . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill = 247482 Identifiable intangibles = 108867 Total = $416956 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 100557 by const_6 which gives divide(100557, const_6), The final logic expression is divide(100557, const_6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2011 to 2012 Context: at december 31 , 2012 , there were approximately 15.5 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 4.77 , $ 5.35 and $ 5.28 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . ### Output: Logic: the change in the percent is the change from the early period to the most recent divide by the early period The required values from the context for the question are: Common stock reserved = 15.5 million Stock options fair value 2012 = $4.77 Stock options fair value 2011 = $5.35 Stock options fair value 2010 = $5.28 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5.35 from 4.77 which gives subtract(4.77, 5.35) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(4.77, 5.35), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(4.77, 5.35), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2024-2028 , what is the average for the u.s . estimated benefit payments by year? Context: the 2024-2028 of u.s . is 900.2 ; the 2024-2028 of international is 336.8 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value expected for all the years in the period divided by 5 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2024-2028 U.S. = 900.2 2024-2028 International = 336.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 900.2 by const_5 which gives divide(900.2, const_5), The final logic expression is divide(900.2, const_5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the total unconditional purchase obligations , what is the percentage of helium purchases concerning the total value? Context: 2017 the total of $ 942 is $ 5331 ; approximately $ 4000 of our unconditional purchase obligations relate to helium purchases , which include crude feedstock supply to multiple helium refining plants in north america as well as refined helium purchases from sources around the world . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of helium purchases divided by the total unconditional purchase obligations , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Total 2017 = $942 Unconditional purchase obligations (helium) = $4000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4000 by 5331 which gives divide(4000, 5331) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4000, 5331), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4000, 5331), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total lifo provisions recorded by the successor from 2007 to 2008 in millions Context: the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the total is the sum of all amounts The required values from the context for the question are: LIFO provisions 2008 = $43.9 million LIFO provisions 2007 = $6.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 43.9 to 6.1 which gives add(43.9, 6.1), The final logic expression is add(43.9, 6.1). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the capital expenditures on a gaap basis , what was the percentual decrease observed in 2016 in comparison with 2015? Context: capital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2016 totaled $ 1055.8 , compared to $ 1265.6 in 2015 . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value of capital expenditures minus the initial value , then divided by the initial one and turned into a percentage to represent the variation . The required values from the context for the question are: Capital expenditures 2016 = $1055.8 Capital expenditures 2015 = $1265.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1265.6 from 1055.8 which gives subtract(1055.8, 1265.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1265.6 which gives divide(subtract(1055.8, 1265.6), 1265.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1055.8, 1265.6), 1265.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1055.8, 1265.6), 1265.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average expected volatility for the years 2007-2009? Context: the expected volatility of 2009 is 41.7% ( 41.7 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2008 is 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2007 is 30.9% ( 30.9 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all percentages of expected volatility during this period divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected volatility 2009 = 41.7% Expected volatility 2008 = 37.9% Expected volatility 2007 = 30.9% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_average(expected volatility, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(expected volatility, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(expected volatility, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the estimated percentual increase in the expected volatility observed during 2007 and 2008? Context: the expected volatility of 2008 is 0.3845 ; the expected volatility of 2007 is 0.3677 ; the expected volatility of 2006 is 0.3534 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the expected volatility in 2008 divided by the expected volatility in 2007 , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected volatility 2008 = 0.3845 Expected volatility 2007 = 0.3677 Expected volatility 2006 = 0.3534 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 0.3845 by 0.3677 which gives divide(0.3845, 0.3677) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(0.3845, 0.3677), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(0.3845, 0.3677), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(0.3845, 0.3677), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2015's capital expenditures on a gaap basis , what is the percentage of the investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates in the total value? Context: the investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates of 2016 is 2014 ; the investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates of 2015 is 4.3 ; the investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates of 2014 is -2.0 ( 2.0 ) ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2016 is $ 1055.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2015 is $ 1304.4 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1360.7 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates value divided by the total and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Investments and advances 2016 = 2014 Investments and advances 2015 = 4.3 Investments and advances 2014 = -2.0 (2.0) Capital expenditures 2016 = $1055.8 Capital expenditures 2015 = $1304.4 Capital expenditures 2014 = $1360.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4.3 by 1304.4 which gives divide(4.3, 1304.4) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4.3, 1304.4), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4.3, 1304.4), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total of dollars brought in by the aerospace end market segment in 2015? Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5342 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 4217 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 4054 ; more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the third- party sales in this segment are from the aerospace end market . ### Output: Logic: it is the total sales value of the third party sales multiplied by the percentage of the aerospace end market segment sales ( 70% ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Third-party sales 2015 = $5342 Third-party sales 2014 = $4217 Third-party sales 2013 = $4054 Aerospace end market sales percentage = 70% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 70% by 5342 which gives multiply(70%, 5342), The final logic expression is multiply(70%, 5342). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the fair value of ars investments between 2009 and 2008? Context: the fair value december 31 2008 of significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) is $ 192 ; the fair value december 31 2009 of significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) is 180 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between each year's fair value of ars investments . The required values from the context for the question are: Fair value 2008 = $192 million Fair value 2009 = $180 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 180 from 192 which gives subtract(192, 180), The final logic expression is subtract(192, 180). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentual decrease in the cash and cash equivalents during this period? Context: the decrease in cash and cash equivalents of for the year ended december 31 2004 ( in thousands ) is -4493 ( 4493 ) ; the cash and cash equivalents beginning of period of for the year ended december 31 2004 ( in thousands ) is 34968 ; cash and cash equivalents were $ 30.5 million and $ 35.0 million at december 31 , 2004 and december 31 , 2003 , respectively . summary of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2004 ( in thousands ) . ### Output: Logic: it is the amount of the decrease in cash and cash equivalents divided by the cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Decrease in cash 2004 = -4493 (4493) Beginning cash 2004 = 34968 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4493 by 34968 which gives divide(4493, 34968) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4493, 34968), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4493, 34968), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest dividend yield during 2016-2018? Context: the dividend yield of 2018 is 3.884% ( 3.884 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2017 is 3.573% ( 3.573 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2016 is 3.634% ( 3.634 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value for the dividend yield during this period . The required values from the context for the question are: Dividend yield 2018 = 3.884% Dividend yield 2017 = 3.573% Dividend yield 2016 = 3.634% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_max(dividend yield, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_max(dividend yield, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_max(dividend yield, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is working capital for 2008? Context: ( in millions ) the current assets of 2008 is $ 164 ; ( in millions ) the current liabilities of 2008 is 62 ; ### Output: Logic: for this question you need to know the formula for working capital which is ( working capital = current assets - current liabilities ) The required values from the context for the question are: Current assets 2008 = $164 million Current liabilities 2008 = 62 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 62 from 164 which gives subtract(164, 62), The final logic expression is subtract(164, 62). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change in cash in 2016 in millions Context: the net cash provided by operating activities of 2016 is $ 1847.8 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2015 is $ 1679.7 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2014 is $ 1529.8 ; the net cash used in investing activities of 2016 is -961.2 ( 961.2 ) ; the net cash used in investing activities of 2015 is -1482.8 ( 1482.8 ) ; the net cash used in investing activities of 2014 is -959.8 ( 959.8 ) ; the net cash used in financing activities of 2016 is -851.2 ( 851.2 ) ; the net cash used in financing activities of 2015 is -239.7 ( 239.7 ) ; the net cash used in financing activities of 2014 is -708.1 ( 708.1 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net change in cash is the sum of all change in the cash sources The required values from the context for the question are: Net cash (operating) 2016 = $1847.8 Net cash (operating) 2015 = $1679.7 Net cash (operating) 2014 = $1529.8 Net cash (investing) 2016 = -961.2 (961.2) Net cash (investing) 2015 = -1482.8 (1482.8) Net cash (investing) 2014 = -959.8 (959.8) Net cash (financing) 2016 = -851.2 (851.2) Net cash (financing) 2015 = -239.7 (239.7) Net cash (financing) 2014 = -708.1 (708.1) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1847.8 to -961.2 which gives add(1847.8, -961.2) step 2: add -851.2 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(-851.2, add(1847.8, -961.2)), The final logic expression is add(-851.2, add(1847.8, -961.2)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average from the proceeds from sales of property and equipment from 2015 to 2017 Context: the proceeds from sales of property and equipment of 2017 is 6.1 ; the proceeds from sales of property and equipment of 2016 is 9.8 ; the proceeds from sales of property and equipment of 2015 is 21.2 ; ### Output: Logic: the average of the three years is equal to the the sum of the 3 years divide by three The required values from the context for the question are: Proceeds 2017 = 6.1 Proceeds 2016 = 9.8 Proceeds 2015 = 21.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6.1 to 9.8 which gives add(6.1, 9.8) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 21.2 which gives add(add(6.1, 9.8), 21.2) step 3: add the expression of step 2 to const_3 which gives add(add(add(6.1, 9.8), 21.2), const_3) step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_2 which gives divide(add(add(add(6.1, 9.8), 21.2), const_3), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(add(6.1, 9.8), 21.2), const_3), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate in the account balance 2015 Context: the actual return on assets of level 3 is 12 ; the purchases issuances and settlements net of level 3 is -3 ( 3 ) ; the balance as of january 1 2015 of level 3 is $ 127 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate of the account balance is the change from the begin to the end dividing the result by the begin balance The required values from the context for the question are: Actual return on assets = 12 Net purchases issuances and settlements = -3 (3) Balance 2015 = $127 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 12 to -3 which gives add(12, -3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 127 which gives divide(add(12, -3), 127) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(12, -3), 127), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(12, -3), 127), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2015 and 2016? Context: the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2014 is $ 197383 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 divided by the 2015's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Interest net 2016 = $252030 Interest net 2015 = $222088 Interest net 2014 = $197383 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 252030 by 222088 which gives divide(252030, 222088) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(252030, 222088), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(252030, 222088), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(252030, 222088), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease in the interest payable between august 2012 and in december 2014? Context: 750.0 ( 1 ) in august 2012 , we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.32% ( 3.32 % ) . ( 2 ) in december 2014 , we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.11% ( 3.11 % ) . ### Output: Logic: its the difference bewteen the interest rates The required values from the context for the question are: Interest rate 2012 = 3.32% Interest rate 2014 = 3.11% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3.32 from 3.11 which gives subtract(3.11, 3.32) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(3.11, 3.32), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(3.11, 3.32), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total square footage of properties charged to sg&a and not cost of sales? Context: the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters located in scottsdale , arizona . ### Output: Logic: support centers and headquarters = sg&a The required values from the context for the question are: Support center space = 260000 sq ft Merchandising center space = 32000 sq ft Corporate headquarters space = 8000 sq ft Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 8000 to 260000 which gives add(8000, 260000) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 32000 which gives add(add(8000, 260000), 32000), The final logic expression is add(add(8000, 260000), 32000). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total cash dividend declared from 2016 to 2018 Context: cash dividends declared were $ 468.4 million , $ 446.3 million and $ 423.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the total amount is the sum of the amounts for each period The required values from the context for the question are: Dividends 2018 = $468.4 million Dividends 2017 = $446.3 million Dividends 2016 = $423.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 468.4 to 446.3 which gives add(468.4, 446.3) step 2: add 423.8 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(423.8, add(468.4, 446.3)), The final logic expression is add(423.8, add(468.4, 446.3)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: by how much does the total joint venture debt from 2012-2016 exceed the joint venture debt after 2016? Context: the joint venture debt of 2012 is 176457 ; the joint venture debt of 2013 is 93683 ; the joint venture debt of 2014 is 123983 ; the joint venture debt of 2015 is 102476 ; the joint venture debt of 2016 is 527814 ; the joint venture debt of thereafter is 800102 ; the joint venture debt of total is 1824515 ; ### Output: Logic: add all years from 2012:2016 and then subtract the ""thereafter"" number The required values from the context for the question are: Debt 2012 = 176457 Debt 2013 = 93683 Debt 2014 = 123983 Debt 2015 = 102476 Debt 2016 = 527814 Debt thereafter = 800102 Total debt = 1824515 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 176457 to 93683 which gives add(176457, 93683) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 123983 which gives add(add(176457, 93683), 123983) step 3: add the expression of step 2 to 102476 which gives add(add(add(176457, 93683), 123983), 102476) step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 527814 which gives add(add(add(add(176457, 93683), 123983), 102476), 527814) step 5: subtract 800102 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(add(add(add(add(176457, 93683), 123983), 102476), 527814), 800102), The final logic expression is subtract(add(add(add(add(176457, 93683), 123983), 102476), 527814), 800102). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the decrease observed in the expense for severance and other benefits? Context: the 2016 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 33.9 ; in fiscal year 2015 , we recognized an expense of $ 207.7 ( $ 153.2 after-tax , or $ .71 per share ) . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value of expense for severance and other benefits minus the initial one , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Charge 2016 = $33.9 Expense 2015 = $207.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 207.7 from 33.9 which gives subtract(33.9, 207.7) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 207.7 which gives divide(subtract(33.9, 207.7), 207.7) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(33.9, 207.7), 207.7), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(33.9, 207.7), 207.7), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation between the weighted- average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by primary metals segment , in years? Context: segment the primary metals of software is 6 ; the primary metals of other intangible assets is 37 ; the following table details the weighted- average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of years of software and other intangible assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Software primary metals = 6 years Other intangible assets primary metals = 37 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6 from 37 which gives subtract(37, 6), The final logic expression is subtract(37, 6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average expense for the significant plans in the u.k.? Context: years ended december 31 the u.k . of 2018 is 45 ; the u.k . of 2017 is 43 ; the u.k . of 2016 is 43 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all expense for the significant plans divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: U.K. 2018 = 45 U.K. 2017 = 43 U.K. 2016 = 43 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(u.k ., none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the risk-free interest rate during 2015 and 2016? Context: the risk-free interest rate of 2016 is 1.15% ( 1.15 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2015 is 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2014 is 1.18% ( 1.18 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those risk-free interest rates . The required values from the context for the question are: Risk-free rate 2016 = 1.15% Risk-free rate 2015 = 1.07% Risk-free rate 2014 = 1.18% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1.07% from 1.15% which gives subtract(1.15%, 1.07%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(1.15%, 1.07%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(1.15%, 1.07%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between firth rixson's goodwill and the rti's? Context: in november 2014 , arconic acquired firth rixson ( see note f ) , and , as a result recognized $ 1801 in goodwill . in march and july 2015 , arconic acquired tital and rti , respectively , ( see note f ) and recognized $ 117 and $ 298 , respectively , in goodwill . ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between each company's goodwill . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill for Firth Rixson = $1801 Goodwill for Tital = $117 Goodwill for RTI = $298 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 298 from 1801 which gives subtract(1801, 298), The final logic expression is subtract(1801, 298). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009? Context: 2008 the 2009 of $ 317 is 275 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those values divided by the initial one , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Value for 2009 = $317 Value for 2008 = $275 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 317 from 275 which gives subtract(275, 317) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 317 which gives divide(subtract(275, 317), 317) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(275, 317), 317), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(275, 317), 317), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the grant date fair value of rsus vested from 2013 to 2014 Context: the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. . ### Output: Logic: the change in grant date fair value of rsus vested from 2013 to 2014 was the ( 2014 amount less 2013 amount ) divide by 2013 amount The required values from the context for the question are: RSUs Vested 2015 = $12 RSUs Vested 2014 = $11 RSUs Vested 2013 = $9 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_9 from 11 which gives subtract(11, const_9) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_9 which gives divide(subtract(11, const_9), const_9) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(11, const_9), const_9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(11, const_9), const_9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the average and the 2014's operating margin? Context: years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the operating margin of 2014 is 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating Margin 2014 = 21.0% Operating Margin 2013 = 19.8% Operating Margin 2012 = 19.6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract table_average(operating margin, none) from 21.0% which gives subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none)) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the value of the nonvested shares at december 31 2009 Context: the nonvested at december 31 2009 of number of units ( in thousands ) is 1415 ; the nonvested at december 31 2009 of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 25.24 ; ### Output: Logic: the value is the product of the number of shares by the price The required values from the context for the question are: Number of Units 2009 = 1415 thousand Weighted Average Fair Value 2009 = $25.24 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1415 by 25.24 which gives multiply(1415, 25.24), The final logic expression is multiply(1415, 25.24). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate on the amex airline index from 12/31/2013 to 12/31/2014 Context: the amex airline index of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2014 is 152 ; the s&p 500 of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is 114 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the recent period less the prior period divided by the prior The required values from the context for the question are: AMEX Airline Index 12/9/2013 = 100 AMEX Airline Index 12/31/2013 = 102 AMEX Airline Index 12/31/2014 = 152 S&P 500 12/9/2013 = 100 S&P 500 12/31/2013 = 102 S&P 500 12/31/2014 = 114 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 102 from 152 which gives subtract(152, 102) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 102 which gives divide(subtract(152, 102), 102) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: during 2010 , what was the return on assets? Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2012 is 146 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2011 is -100 ( 100 ) ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2010 is 131 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2009 is 119 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2008 is -2397 ( 2397 ) ; ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total assets of year ended december 31 2012 is 6392 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2011 is 6069 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2010 is 5270 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2009 is 5097 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2008 is 4821 ; ### Output: Logic: net income divided by total assets The required values from the context for the question are: Net Earnings 2012 = $146 million Net Earnings 2011 = -$100 million Net Earnings 2010 = $131 million Net Earnings 2009 = $119 million Net Earnings 2008 = -$2397 million Total Assets 2012 = $6392 million Total Assets 2011 = $6069 million Total Assets 2010 = $5270 million Total Assets 2009 = $5097 million Total Assets 2008 = $4821 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 131 by 5270 which gives divide(131, 5270) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(131, 5270), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(131, 5270), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2017 and 2018 , what was the increase observed in the net capitalized costs? Context: the net capitalized costs of 2018 is $ 25655931 ; the net capitalized costs of 2017 is $ 23364494 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the net capitalized costs of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Net Capitalized Costs 2018 = $25655931 Net Capitalized Costs 2017 = $23364494 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 25655931 by 23364494 which gives divide(25655931, 23364494) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(25655931, 23364494), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(25655931, 23364494), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(25655931, 23364494), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: 3 net income ( loss ) $ 132.8 \\n5 income tax expense ( benefit ) 62.7 Context: ( in millions ) the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 132.8 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 119.0 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is $ 17.1 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is $ -29.2 ( 29.2 ) ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2009 is $ -373.4 ( 373.4 ) ; ( in millions ) the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2013 is 62.7 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is 67.1 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is 11.2 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is -7.8 ( 7.8 ) ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2009 is -87.8 ( 87.8 ) ; ### Output: Logic: taxes divided by pretax income The required values from the context for the question are: Net Income 2013 = $132.8 million Net Income 2012 = $119.0 million Net Income 2011 = $17.1 million Net Income 2010 = -$29.2 million Net Income 2009 = -$373.4 million Income Tax Expense 2013 = $62.7 million Income Tax Expense 2012 = $67.1 million Income Tax Expense 2011 = $11.2 million Income Tax Expense 2010 = -$7.8 million Income Tax Expense 2009 = -$87.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 62.7 to 132.8 which gives add(62.7, 132.8) step 2: divide 62.7 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2016 and 2017? Context: the interest net of capitalized interest of 2017 is $ 275305 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the cash paid as interest net of capitalized interest in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Interest 2017 = $275305 Interest 2016 = $252030 Interest 2015 = $222088 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 275305 by 252030 which gives divide(275305, 252030) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(275305, 252030), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(275305, 252030), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(275305, 252030), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average of the deductions during the period of 2003-2006? Context: balance december 31 2003 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 514177 is -1390 ( 1390 ) ; balance december 31 2003 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 514177 is -15244 ( 15244 ) ; balance december 31 2003 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 514177 is -12807 ( 12807 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the value of the deductions divided by three ( the sum of the years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Deductions 2014 (Property 1) = -$1390 Deductions 2014 (Property 2) = -$15244 Deductions 2014 (Property 3) = -$12807 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1390 to 15244 which gives add(1390, 15244) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 12807 which gives add(add(1390, 15244), 12807) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(1390, 15244), 12807), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(1390, 15244), 12807), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentual increase in the additions during 2004 and 2005? Context: balance december 31 2003 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 514177 is 82551 ; balance december 31 2003 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 514177 is 83656 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the addition in 2005 divided by the value in 2004 , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Addition 2014 (Expense 1) = $82551 Addition 2014 (Expense 2) = $83656 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 83656 by 82551 which gives divide(83656, 82551) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(83656, 82551), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(83656, 82551), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(83656, 82551), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total gross amount of money that the company received from their favorable audit? Context: the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . ### Output: Logic: the initial $ 12356 was added to the total due to them already subtracting that from expenses earlier . the next is unattributed money earned from investments . once added up the interest that was earned , you get $ 32885 . The required values from the context for the question are: Overall Tax Benefit = $25920 thousand FIN 48 Reserve = $12356 thousand Net Expense 2010 = -$9938 thousand Accrued Interest 2010 = -$10591 thousand Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 12356 to 9938 which gives add(12356, 9938) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 10591 which gives add(add(12356, 9938), 10591), The final logic expression is add(add(12356, 9938), 10591). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the loss on datacenter and related legal fees in 2015 in millions dollars? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the loss on datacenter and related legal fees of year-over-yearchange is $ 28.6 ; the loss on datacenter and related legal fees of change as apercentage of2015 expenses is 2% ( 2 % ) ; recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees . ### Output: Logic: considering that $ 28.6 millions represents a 2% increase in the loss on datacenter and related legal fees of 2015 , the original value is calculated dividing the increase of $ 28.6 by its the percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Year-over-year Change Loss = $28.6 million Change as a Percentage of 2015 Expenses = 2% Total Losses and Expenses = $28.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 28.6 by 2% which gives divide(28.6, 2%), The final logic expression is divide(28.6, 2%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what would the estimated minimum amount of tier 1 common equity be under the minimum basel 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) standard ? ( billions ) Context: tier 1 common under basel i rules the estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules of $ 148887 is $ 151202 ; the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . ### Output: Logic: estimate total capital by dividing by the actual 9.4% The required values from the context for the question are: Tier 1 Common Basel I = $148887 Tier 1 Common Basel III = $151202 Tier 1 Common Ratio = 9.4% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 151202 by 9.4% which gives divide(151202, 9.4%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 6.5% which gives multiply(divide(151202, 9.4%), 6.5%), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(151202, 9.4%), 6.5%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net debt to equity ratio Context: the total liabilities assumed of ( in millions ) is 85 ; the net assets acquired of ( in millions ) is $ 110 ; ### Output: Logic: the debt to equity ratio is the sum of the debt divided by the equity The required values from the context for the question are: Total Liabilities Assumed = $85 million Net Assets Acquired = $110 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 85 by 110 which gives divide(85, 110), The final logic expression is divide(85, 110). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted stocks in 2006 and 2007? Context: the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the 2007 weighted average grant date fair value divided by the 2006's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Restricted Stock Awards 2007 = $63.59 Restricted Stock Awards 2006 = $54.36 Restricted Stock Awards 2005 = $32.81 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 63.59 by 54.36 which gives divide(63.59, 54.36) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(63.59, 54.36), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(63.59, 54.36), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(63.59, 54.36), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2013-2015 , what is the highest value of interest incurred? Context: the interest incurred of 2015 is $ 152.6 ; the interest incurred of 2014 is $ 158.1 ; the interest incurred of 2013 is $ 167.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of interest incurred . The required values from the context for the question are: Interest Incurred 2015 = $152.6 Interest Incurred 2014 = $158.1 Interest Incurred 2013 = $167.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(interest incurred, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average rate for the international plans? Context: qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the rates divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: Qualified Plan Rate = 2.25% International Plans Rate = 7.00% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2.25% to 7.00% which gives add(2.25%, 7.00%) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(2.25%, 7.00%), const_2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(2.25%, 7.00%), const_2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(2.25%, 7.00%), const_2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the change in accumulated depreciation from depreciation expenses from 2013 to december 31 , 2015 Context: $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . ### Output: Logic: the amount of accumulated depreciation from the years 2015-2013 was the the sum of the depreciation expense for each year . The required values from the context for the question are: Depreciation Expense 2015 = $405 Depreciation Expense 2014 = $392 Depreciation Expense 2013 = $374 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 405 to 392 which gives add(405, 392) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 374 which gives add(add(405, 392), 374), The final logic expression is add(add(405, 392), 374). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual reduction of intersegment sales concerning the total sales during 2013 and 2014? Context: the intersegment sales of 2015 is 1687 ; the intersegment sales of 2014 is 1941 ; the intersegment sales of 2013 is 2235 ; the total sales of 2015 is $ 5142 ; the total sales of 2014 is $ 5450 ; the total sales of 2013 is $ 5561 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the percentage of intersegment sales concerning total sales in 2013 ( 40.19% ) and 2014 ( 35.61% ) The required values from the context for the question are: Intersegment Sales 2015 = $1687 Intersegment Sales 2014 = $1941 Intersegment Sales 2013 = $2235 Total Sales 2015 = $5142 Total Sales 2014 = $5450 Total Sales 2013 = $5561 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1941 by 5450 which gives divide(1941, 5450) step 2: divide 2235 by 5561 which gives divide(2235, 5561) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(2235, 5561), divide(1941, 5450)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(2235, 5561), divide(1941, 5450)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(2235, 5561), divide(1941, 5450)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the contract terms of 10 years , what will be the total expense with the depreciation of the electronics and performance materials segment?\\n Context: the electronics and performance materials of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 12 ; the electronics and performance materials of increase life by 1 year is $ -11 ( 11 ) ; there are also long-term customer supply contracts associated with the tonnage gases business within the electronics and performance materials segment . these contracts principally have initial terms of 10 to 15 years . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of years of the contract multiplied by the increased life by year . The required values from the context for the question are: Decrease Life = $12 Increase Life = -$11 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10 by 11 which gives multiply(10, 11), The final logic expression is multiply(10, 11). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2008 , what is the percentage of loans held-for-sale in total loans? Context: ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of 2009 is -389 ( 389 ) ; the loans held-for-sale of 2008 is -2728 ( 2728 ) ; the loans held-for-sale of 2007 is -502 ( 502 ) ; ( in millions ) the total loans of 2009 is -3939 ( 3939 ) ; the total loans of 2008 is -3887 ( 3887 ) ; the total loans of 2007 is -720 ( 720 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the loans held-for-sale divided by the total loans in 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: Loans Held-for-sale 2009 = -$389 million Loans Held-for-sale 2008 = -$2728 million Loans Held-for-sale 2007 = -$502 million Total Loans 2009 = -$3939 million Total Loans 2008 = -$3887 million Total Loans 2007 = -$720 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2728 by 3887 which gives divide(2728, 3887) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2728, 3887), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2728, 3887), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties concerning the total carrying amount in 2017? Context: the carrying amount at beginning of period of 2018 is $ 946848 ; the carrying amount at beginning of period of 2017 is $ 912926 ; during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties in millions divided by the total carrying amount , also in millions , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Carrying amount at beginning of period of 2018 = 946848 Carrying amount at beginning of period of 2017 = 912926 Carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties written down in 2017 = 370 Fair value of proved oil and gas properties after write-down = 146 Pretax impairment charges in 2017 = 224 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 912926 by const_1000 which gives divide(912926, const_1000) step 2: divide 370 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(370, divide(912926, const_1000)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(370, divide(912926, const_1000)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(370, divide(912926, const_1000)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of maturities from 2008 to 2009 Context: 2008 the 2009 of $ 193101 is 605762 ; 2008 the 2008 of $ 193101 is $ 193101 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change in the maturities from 2008 to 2009 is the rate of the growth of the maturities from that year to th enxt The required values from the context for the question are: Maturities in 2008 = 193101 Maturities in 2009 = 605762 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 193101 from 605762 which gives subtract(605762, 193101) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 193101 which gives divide(subtract(605762, 193101), 193101) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(605762, 193101), 193101), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(605762, 193101), 193101), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest revenue observed in this period? Context: years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2011 is $ 4501 ; the revenue of 2010 is $ 2111 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 1267 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value . The required values from the context for the question are: Revenue in 2011 = 4501 Revenue in 2010 = 2111 Revenue in 2009 = 1267 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(revenue, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015 and 2016 , what is the percentual increase observed in the total compensation expense under the stock plan? Context: total compensation expense under the stock plan was approximately $ 10.8 million , $ 12.2 million and $ 6.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the compensation expense under the stock plan in 2016 divided by the 2015's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Compensation expense under the stock plan in 2017 = 10.8 million Compensation expense under the stock plan in 2016 = 12.2 million Compensation expense under the stock plan in 2015 = 6.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 12.2 by 6.9 which gives divide(12.2, 6.9) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(12.2, 6.9), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(12.2, 6.9), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(12.2, 6.9), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of unconsolidated units among the total units? Context: multifamily the unconsolidated of communities is 1 ; the unconsolidated of units is 269 ; multifamily the total of communities is 304 ; the total of units is 100864 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of unconsolidated units divided by the total units , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Unconsolidated units in multifamily communities = 1 Unconsolidated units = 269 Total units in multifamily communities = 304 Total units = 100864 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 269 by 100864 which gives divide(269, 100864) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(269, 100864), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(269, 100864), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the return of the second year of the investment for peer group? Context: the peer group of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 137 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 175 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 186 ; the peer group of 12/31/2016 is $ 188 ; the peer group of 12/31/2017 is $ 238 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the investment in the second year divided by the first year's , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Peer group value on 12/31/2012 = 100 Peer group value on 12/31/2013 = 137 Peer group value on 12/31/2014 = 175 Peer group value on 12/31/2015 = 186 Peer group value on 12/31/2016 = 188 Peer group value on 12/31/2017 = 238 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 175 by 137 which gives divide(175, 137) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(175, 137), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(175, 137), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(175, 137), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in billions , what is the pro-forma shareholders equity? Context: ( in billions except ratios ) the assets of reported is $ 1562.1 ; the assets of pro forma is $ 1623.9 ; ( in billions except ratios ) the liabilities of reported is 1438.9 ; the liabilities of pro forma is 1500.9 ; ### Output: Logic: assets minus liabilities= se The required values from the context for the question are: Reported assets = 1562.1 Pro forma assets = 1623.9 Reported liabilities = 1438.9 Pro forma liabilities = 1500.9 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1500.9 from 1623.9 which gives subtract(1623.9, 1500.9), The final logic expression is subtract(1623.9, 1500.9). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the s&p 500 index from 2011 to 2016 Context: the s&p 500 index of 2011 is 100.0 ; the s&p 500 index of 2012 is 116.00 ; the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 153.57 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 174.60 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 177.01 ; the s&p 500 index of 2016 is 198.18 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2011 is 100.0 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2012 is 113.39 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2013 is 142.85 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2014 is 150.44 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2015 is 142.44 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2016 is 165.34 ; ### Output: Logic: to find the growth rate you divide the change in the amounts by the earliest amount The required values from the context for the question are: S&P 500 index in 2011 = 100.0 S&P 500 index in 2012 = 116.00 S&P 500 index in 2013 = 153.57 S&P 500 index in 2014 = 174.60 S&P 500 index in 2015 = 177.01 S&P 500 index in 2016 = 198.18 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100.0 from 198.18 which gives subtract(198.18, 100.0) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(198.18, 100.0), const_100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(198.18, 100.0), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(198.18, 100.0), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2013 and 2012 , what is the variation observed in the expected return on plan assets , in millions? Context: years ended december 31 the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2013 is -1097 ( 1097 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2012 is -970 ( 970 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2011 is -972 ( 972 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2013 is -126 ( 126 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of pension benefits 2012 is -136 ( 136 ) ; the expected return on plan assets of 2011 is -142 ( 142 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between each year's expected return on plan assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2013 = -1097 Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2012 = -970 Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2011 = -972 Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2013 = -126 Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2012 = -136 Expected return on plan assets of pension benefits in 2011 = -142 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 970 from 1097 which gives subtract(1097, 970), The final logic expression is subtract(1097, 970). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what as the leverage of the debt to assets of elder trust at the time of the to the purchase Context: the total liabilities assumed of ( in millions ) is 85 ; the total assets acquired of ( in millions ) is $ 195 ; ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the debt to the assets show how much of each dollar invested in debt produces assets The required values from the context for the question are: Total liabilities assumed = 85 Total assets acquired = 195 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 85 by 195 which gives divide(85, 195), The final logic expression is divide(85, 195). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average tax benefit , in millions? Context: years ended december 31 the tax benefit of 2009 is 68 ; the tax benefit of 2008 is 82 ; the tax benefit of 2007 is 64 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all tax benefits divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Tax benefit of 2009 = 68 Tax benefit of 2008 = 82 Tax benefit of 2007 = 64 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(tax benefit, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of class b-3 common stock in relation with the total class b common stocks in 2009? Context: ( in thousands ) the class b-1 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 0.6 ; the class b-1 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 0.6 ; ( in thousands ) the class b-2 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 0.8 ; the class b-2 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 0.8 ; ( in thousands ) the class b-3 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 1.3 ; the class b-3 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 1.3 ; ( in thousands ) the class b-4 common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 0.4 ; the class b-4 common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 0.4 ; ### Output: Logic: considering the sum of all class b common stocks , the percentage is calculated dividing the class b-3 ( 1.3 ) by the total amount . The required values from the context for the question are: Class b-1 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 0.6 Class b-1 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 0.6 Class b-2 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 0.8 Class b-2 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 0.8 Class b-3 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 1.3 Class b-3 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 1.3 Class b-4 common stock on December 31, 2010 = 0.4 Class b-4 common stock on December 31, 2009 = 0.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1.3 to 0.4 which gives add(1.3, 0.4) step 2: add 0.6 to 0.8 which gives add(0.6, 0.8) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8)) step 4: divide 1.3 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(1.3, add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8))) step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.3, add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8))), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.3, add(add(1.3, 0.4), add(0.6, 0.8))), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of fully-insured memberships among the total commercial medical membership? Context: the fully-insured of smart plans and other consumer membership is 392500 ; the fully-insured of other commercial membership is 1586300 ; the fully-insured of commercial medical membership is 1978800 ; the total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership is 670000 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2950800 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3620800 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of fully-insured memberships divided by the total number of memberships , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Fully-insured memberships of smart plans and other consumer membership = 392500 Fully-insured memberships of other commercial membership = 1586300 Fully-insured memberships of commercial medical membership = 1978800 Total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership = 670000 Total commercial medical of other commercial membership = 2950800 Total commercial medical of commercial medical membership = 3620800 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1978800 by 3620800 which gives divide(1978800, 3620800) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1978800, 3620800), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1978800, 3620800), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase in the interest expenses during 2017 and 2018? Context: the interest expense of 2018 is $ 130.5 ; the interest expense of 2017 is $ 120.6 ; the interest expense of 2016 is $ 115.2 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the interest expense of 2018 divided by the 2017's then turned into a percentage.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Interest expense of 2018 = 130.5 Interest expense of 2017 = 120.6 Interest expense of 2016 = 115.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 130.5 by 120.6 which gives divide(130.5, 120.6) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(130.5, 120.6), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(130.5, 120.6), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(130.5, 120.6), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the value of the total premiums and aso fees , in billions? Context: for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , tricare administrative services fees totaled $ 50.1 million , or 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees . ### Output: Logic: considering the $ 50.1 million as 0.4% , the total 100% is calculated by multiplying the 50.1 by 100 , then dividing by 0.4 . The required values from the context for the question are: Tricare administrative services fees in 2005 = 50.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 50.1 by const_100 which gives multiply(50.1, const_100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 0.4 which gives divide(multiply(50.1, const_100), 0.4) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_1000 which gives divide(divide(multiply(50.1, const_100), 0.4), const_1000), The final logic expression is divide(divide(multiply(50.1, const_100), 0.4), const_1000). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013 Context: the expected volatility of 2014 is 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2013 is 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2012 is 27.8% ( 27.8 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period The required values from the context for the question are: Expected volatility of 2014 = 27.5% Expected volatility of 2013 = 28.9% Expected volatility of 2012 = 27.8% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 27.8 from 28.9 which gives subtract(28.9, 27.8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 27.8 which gives divide(subtract(28.9, 27.8), 27.8) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 27.8), 27.8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 27.8), 27.8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase in the deductions during 2006 and 2007 , in thousands of dollars? Context: balance december 31 2004 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 595338 is -12807 ( 12807 ) ; balance december 31 2004 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 595338 is -80258 ( 80258 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those deduction values . The required values from the context for the question are: Deductions during period 2014 disposition and retirements of property in 2004 = 595338 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 12807 from 80258 which gives subtract(80258, 12807), The final logic expression is subtract(80258, 12807). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the excess of current cost over lifo cost from 2008 to 2009 . Context: the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from the recent to the most recent divide by the recent The required values from the context for the question are: Excess of current cost over LIFO cost at January 30, 2009 = 50.0 million Excess of current cost over LIFO cost at February 1, 2008 = 6.1 million LIFO provisions during 2008 = 43.9 million LIFO provisions during 2007 = 6.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6.1 from 50.0 which gives subtract(50.0, 6.1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(50.0, 6.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(50.0, 6.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the ratio of the long-term debt after 2016 to the total long term debt Context: 2012 the thereafter of $ 29 is 1305 ; 2012 the total long-term debt of $ 29 is $ 1859 ; ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the long term debt after 2016 to the total long term debt means that for every $ 1 of the total long term debt is made up of $ 0.70 of long term debt due after 2016 The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt after 2016 in 2012 = 29 Long-term debt after 2016 = 1305 Total long-term debt in 2012 = 29 Total long-term debt = 1859 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1305 by 1859 which gives divide(1305, 1859), The final logic expression is divide(1305, 1859). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2008 , what is the variation between the high of foreign exchange contracts and the high of the interest rate contracts? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 28.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 14.2 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 average is $ 21.6 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 18.8 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 5.3 ; the foreign exchange contracts of average is $ 11.3 ; ( in millions ) the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 high is 34.3 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 low is 23.0 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 average is 29.5 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 high is 28.8 ; the interest rate contracts of june 30 2009 low is 12.6 ; the interest rate contracts of average is 20.0 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between these values.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: High value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 28.4 Low value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 14.2 Average value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 21.6 High value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 18.8 Low value of foreign exchange contracts on June 30, 2009 = 5.3 Average value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 11.3 High value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 34.3 Low value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 23.0 Average value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 29.5 High value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 28.8 Low value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 12.6 Average value of interest rate contracts on June 30, 2009 = 20.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 28.4 from 34.3 which gives subtract(34.3, 28.4), The final logic expression is subtract(34.3, 28.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average free cash flow provided by continuing operations from 2016 to 2018 in millions Context: years ended december 31 the free cash flow provided by continuing operations of 2018 is $ 1446 ; the free cash flow provided by continuing operations of 2017 is $ 486 ; the free cash flow provided by continuing operations of 2016 is $ 1673 ; ### Output: Logic: the average free cash flow provided by continuing operations from 2016 to 2018 was $ 1201.2 The required values from the context for the question are: Free cash flow provided by continuing operations in 2018 = 1446 Free cash flow provided by continuing operations in 2017 = 486 Free cash flow provided by continuing operations in 2016 = 1673 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1446 to 486 which gives add(1446, 486) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1673 which gives add(add(1446, 486), 1673) step 3: add the expression of step 2 to const_3 which gives add(add(add(1446, 486), 1673), const_3) step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_2 which gives divide(add(add(add(1446, 486), 1673), const_3), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(add(1446, 486), 1673), const_3), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in the 2009 global incentive plan what is the percent of the shares available to the shares subject to a outstanding awards Context: the 2009 global incentive plan of shares available for awards is 2322450 ; the 2009 global incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards is 2530454 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the amount in question divide by the total The required values from the context for the question are: Shares available for awards in 2009 global incentive plan = 2322450 Shares subject to outstanding awards in 2009 global incentive plan = 2530454 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2322450 to 2530454 which gives add(2322450, 2530454) step 2: divide 2322450 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(2322450, add(2322450, 2530454)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2322450, add(2322450, 2530454)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2322450, add(2322450, 2530454)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2019-2020 , what was the decrease observed in the projected benefit payments? Context: 2017 the 2019 of $ 11.5 is 10.7 ; 2017 the 2020 of $ 11.5 is 10.2 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2020 value of the projected benefit payment divided by the 2019's then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Projected benefit payment in 2019 = 11.5 Projected benefit payment in 2017 = 10.7 Projected benefit payment in 2020 = 10.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 10.2 by 10.7 which gives divide(10.2, 10.7) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(10.2, 10.7), const_1), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: between 2018 and 2017 what was the percent change in the weighted average cost per share Context: the weighted average cost per share of 2018 is $ 69.06 ; the weighted average cost per share of 2017 is $ 63.84 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference between the 2 periods divide by the earliest period The required values from the context for the question are: Weighted average cost per share in 2018 = 69.06 Weighted average cost per share in 2017 = 63.84 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 63.84 from 69.06 which gives subtract(69.06, 63.84) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 63.84 which gives divide(subtract(69.06, 63.84), 63.84), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(69.06, 63.84), 63.84). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what were the average operating rental expenses from 2015 to 2017 in millions Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 29 million , $ 24 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the average is the sum of the periods divided by the count The required values from the context for the question are: Rental expenses under operating leases in 2017 = 29 million Rental expenses under operating leases in 2016 = 24 million Rental expenses under operating leases in 2015) = 21 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 29 to 24 which gives add(29, 24) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 21 which gives add(add(29, 24), 21) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(29, 24), 21), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(29, 24), 21), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much more money would jp morgan need to meet management 2019s plan to reach an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5%? Context: tier 1 common under basel i rules the estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules of $ 140342 is $ 143966 ; the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules would be 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 . management 2019s current objective is for the firm to reach , by the end of 2013 , an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) . tier 1 common under basel i rules the estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a ) of $ 140342 is $ 1647903 ; ### Output: Logic: to find out how much money the firm would need we need to take the current estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules and multiple it by 9.5% . we then take this number and subtract it from the current estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules . this will get us our final answer of $ 12584 The required values from the context for the question are: Final answer based on estimated risk-weighted assets under Basel III rules and Tier 1 common under Basel III rules = 12584 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1647903 by 9.5% which gives multiply(1647903, 9.5%) step 2: subtract 143966 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(multiply(1647903, 9.5%), 143966), The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(1647903, 9.5%), 143966). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of dec 13 , 2013 , if all forfeited shares became vested , what percentage of shares would be vested? Context: cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding . ### Output: Logic: add forfeited shares to vested shares , then divide by total shares The required values from the context for the question are: Shares of restricted stock received by class b common unit holders = 3798508 Shares of restricted stock that vested/settled = 1200544 Shares of restricted stock that were forfeited = 5931 Outstanding shares of restricted stock = 2592033 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 5931 to 1200544 which gives add(5931, 1200544) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3798508 which gives divide(add(5931, 1200544), 3798508) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(5931, 1200544), 3798508), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(5931, 1200544), 3798508), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation of the effective tax rate considering the years 2018-2019? Context: the effective tax rate was 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) and 26.0% ( 26.0 % ) in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those effective tax rates during these years . The required values from the context for the question are: Effective tax rate in fiscal year 2019: 21.0% Effective tax rate in fiscal year 2018: 26.0% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21.0% from 26.0% which gives subtract(26.0%, 21.0%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(26.0%, 21.0%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(26.0%, 21.0%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the operating margin during 2010 and 2011? Context: years ended december 31 , the operating margin of 2011 is 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2010 is 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those margins . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating margin in 2011: 19.3% Operating margin in 2010: 18.6% Operating margin in 2009: 14.3% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 18.6% from 19.3% which gives subtract(19.3%, 18.6%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(19.3%, 18.6%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(19.3%, 18.6%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the variation observed in the growth of the atoi in the transportation and construction solutions engineered products and solutions segments? Context: atoi for the engineered products and solutions segment increased $ 47 , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily related to net productivity improvements across all businesses as well as the volume increase from both the rti acquisition and organic revenue growth , partially offset by a lower margin product mix and pricing pressures in the aerospace end market . atoi for the transportation and construction solutions segment increased $ 10 , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , principally driven by net productivity improvements across all businesses and growth in the building and construction segment , partially offset by lower demand in the north american heavy duty truck and brazilian markets. . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the percentual growth of both segments' atoi . The required values from the context for the question are: ATOI increase for engineered products and solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: $47 ATOI increase for transportation and construction solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: $10 Percentage increase in ATOI for engineered products and solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: 8% Percentage increase in ATOI for transportation and construction solutions segment in 2016 compared with 2015: 6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6% from 8% which gives subtract(8%, 6%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(8%, 6%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(8%, 6%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net adjustments as recorded in 2011 in millions Context: ( $ in millions ) the payments of employee compensation is -24 ( 24 ) ; the payments of other accruals is -36 ( 36 ) ; the payments of total is -60 ( 60 ) ; ( $ in millions ) the adjustments of employee compensation is 47 ; the adjustments of other accruals is -3 ( 3 ) ; the adjustments of total is 44 ; ### Output: Logic: the net adjustment is the sum of both activities in 2011 The required values from the context for the question are: Payments of employee compensation in 2011: -$24 million Payments of other accruals in 2011: -$36 million Payments of total in 2011: -$60 million Adjustments of employee compensation in 2011: $47 million Adjustments of other accruals in 2011: -$3 million Adjustments of total in 2011: $44 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 24 by const_m1 which gives multiply(24, const_m1) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 47 which gives add(multiply(24, const_m1), 47), The final logic expression is add(multiply(24, const_m1), 47). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest value of unamortized expense during this period? Context: the unamortized expense based on current performance levels of 2011 is $ 60 ; the unamortized expense based on current performance levels of 2010 is $ 18 ; the unamortized expense based on current performance levels of 2009 is $ 4 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value of unamortized expense . The required values from the context for the question are: Unamortized expense based on current performance levels in 2011: $60 Unamortized expense based on current performance levels in 2010: $18 Unamortized expense based on current performance levels in 2009: $4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(unamortized expense based on current performance levels, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average price of the the nareit all equity index from 2005 to 2009 Context: the the nareit all equity index of 2005 is 100 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2006 is 135 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2007 is 114 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2008 is 71 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2009 is 91 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2010 is 116 ; ### Output: Logic: the average share price over the 5 years is the sum of the share price divide by 5 The required values from the context for the question are: Nareit all equity index in 2005: 100 Nareit all equity index in 2006: 135 Nareit all equity index in 2007: 114 Nareit all equity index in 2008: 71 Nareit all equity index in 2009: 91 Nareit all equity index in 2010: 116 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 100 to 135 which gives add(100, 135) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 114 which gives add(add(100, 135), 114) step 3: add the expression of step 2 to 71 which gives add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71) step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 91 which gives add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91) step 5: add the expression of step 4 to const_5 which gives add(add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91), const_5) step 6: divide the expression of step 5 by const_2 which gives divide(add(add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91), const_5), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(add(add(add(100, 135), 114), 71), 91), const_5), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years from 2009 to 2013 in millions Context: for intangible assets subject to amortization , the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows : 2009 - $ 41.1 million , 2010 - $ 27.3 million , 2011 - $ 20.9 million , 2012 - $ 17.0 million , and 2013 - $ 12.0 million . ### Output: Logic: this the sum of all amounts associated The required values from the context for the question are: Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2009: $41.1 million Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2010: $27.3 million Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2011: $20.9 million Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2012: $17.0 million Estimated aggregate amortization expense for 2013: $12.0 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 41.1 to 27.3 which gives add(41.1, 27.3) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 20.9 which gives add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9) step 3: add the expression of step 2 to 17.0 which gives add(add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9), 17.0) step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 12.0 which gives add(add(add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9), 17.0), 12.0), The final logic expression is add(add(add(add(41.1, 27.3), 20.9), 17.0), 12.0). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase observed in the initial balance between 2017 and 2018? Context: the balance at january 1 of 2018 is 1162635 ; the balance at january 1 of 2017 is 1053027 ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is 1045640 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the initial balance of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance at January 1 of 2018: $1,162,635 Balance at January 1 of 2017: $1,053,027 Balance at January 1 of 2016: $1,045,640 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1162635 by 1053027 which gives divide(1162635, 1053027) step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1162635, 1053027), 1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1162635, 1053027), 1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1162635, 1053027), 1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated number of shares of series a common stock based on the approximate cash dividend in millions Context: based on the number of outstanding shares of our series a common stock , the anticipated annual cash dividend is approximately $ 25 million . dividend policy in july 2005 , our board of directors adopted a policy of declaring , subject to legally available funds , a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our common stock at an annual rate initially equal to approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of the $ 16 price per share in the initial public offering of our series a common stock ( or $ 0.16 per share ) unless our board of directors , in its sole discretion , determines otherwise , commencing the second quarter of 2005 . ### Output: Logic: to get the number of shouts of series a common stock you divide the total annual cash dividend by the dividend amount The required values from the context for the question are: Anticipated annual cash dividend for Series A common stock: Approximately $25 million Price per share in the initial public offering of Series A common stock: $16 Annual cash dividend rate for Series A common stock in initial public offering: Approximately 1% (1%) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 25 by 0.16 which gives divide(25, 0.16), The final logic expression is divide(25, 0.16). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the average value recorded for reserves for environmental matters , in millions of dollars? Context: as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the reserves available during 2016 and 2017 divided by two ( the period of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Reserves for environmental matters as of December 31, 2017: $28.9 million Reserves for environmental matters as of December 31, 2016: $30.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 28.9 to 30.6 which gives add(28.9, 30.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(28.9, 30.6), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(28.9, 30.6), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the growth in meausurement of the booking holdings inc.2016 to 2017 Context: measurement pointdecember 31 the 2016 of booking holdings inc . is 236.31 ; the 2016 of nasdaqcomposite index is 187.19 ; the 2016 of s&p 500index is 170.84 ; the 2016 of rdg internetcomposite is 235.33 ; measurement pointdecember 31 the 2017 of booking holdings inc . is 280.10 ; the 2017 of nasdaqcomposite index is 242.29 ; the 2017 of s&p 500index is 208.14 ; the 2017 of rdg internetcomposite is 338.52 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth in measurement of the booking holdings inc.2016 to 2017 was 18.5% The required values from the context for the question are: Measurement point for Booking Holdings Inc. on December 31, 2016: 236.31 Measurement point for Booking Holdings Inc. on December 31, 2017: 280.10 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 236.31 from 280.10 which gives subtract(280.10, 236.31), The final logic expression is subtract(280.10, 236.31). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the operating profit margin for the year of 2015? Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the revenue of 2015 is $ 3339 ; the revenue of 2014 is $ 2623 ; the revenue of 2013 is $ 2235 ; the revenue of % ( % ) change 2014 to 2015 is 27.3% ( 27.3 % ) ; the revenue of % ( % ) change 2013 to 2014 is 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the operating income before depreciation and amortization of 2015 is $ 1464 ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of 2014 is $ 1096 ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of 2013 is $ 943 ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of % ( % ) change 2014 to 2015 is 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) ; the operating income before depreciation and amortization of % ( % ) change 2013 to 2014 is 16.3% ( 16.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: operating margin is a measure of the efficiency of on going operations before extraneous expenses of overhead . The required values from the context for the question are: Revenue for the year 2015: $3,339 million Revenue for the year 2014: $2,623 million Revenue for the year 2013: $2,235 million Operating income before depreciation and amortization for 2015: $1,464 million Operating income before depreciation and amortization for 2014: $1,096 million Operating income before depreciation and amortization for 2013: $943 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1464 by 3339 which gives divide(1464, 3339) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1464, 3339), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1464, 3339), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2010 , what is the difference between the expected contributions and the goodwill and other intangible assets value , in millions? Context: estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 381 million in 2010 as compared with $ 437 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Provision for loan losses in 2011: $1.152 billion Provision for loan losses in 2008: $1.6 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 381 from 437 which gives subtract(437, 381), The final logic expression is subtract(437, 381). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the operating expense ratio for ccuk ( in millions ) ? Context: ccuk has contracted annual revenues of approximately a327.2 million ( $ 48.5 million ) for the provision of transmission , distribution and multiplexing services related to its multiplex licenses , which replaces the approximately a319.4 million annual revenues previously earned from the itvd contract and is in addition to the revenues generated from the 1998 bbc digital transmission contract . since ccuk is providing a more complete end-to-end service to content providers than was provided to itvd , ccuk is incurring certain additional annual operating costs of approximately a34.6 million ( $ 8.2 million ) . ### Output: Logic: the operating expense ratio is the operating expensive divided by the revenue . line 19 has the revenue for ccuk and line 23 has the operating costs for ccuk . The required values from the context for the question are: Medical and other expenses payable: -$37,375 (in thousands) Other current liabilities: -$23,359 (in thousands) Other liabilities: -$5,915 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 8.2 by 48.5 which gives divide(8.2, 48.5), The final logic expression is divide(8.2, 48.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2009 , what percentage of its net aggregate carrying amount did the firm record as its allowance for loan losses? Context: in 2009 , an allowance for loan losses of $ 1.6 billion was recorded for the prime mortgage and option arm pools of loans . the net aggregate carrying amount of the pools that have an allowance for loan losses was $ 47.2 billion at december 31 , 2009 . ### Output: Logic: the firm's allowance for loan losses , $ 1.6 billion , came from an aggregate pool of $ 47.2 billion . The required values from the context for the question are: Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1.6 by 47.2 which gives divide(1.6, 47.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.6, 47.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.6, 47.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total value of liabilities , in thousands? Context: the medical and other expenses payable of ( in thousands ) is -37375 ( 37375 ) ; the other current liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -23359 ( 23359 ) ; the other liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -5915 ( 5915 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all liabilities.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Medical and other expenses payable: -$37,375 (in thousands) Other current liabilities: -$23,359 (in thousands) Other liabilities: -$5,915 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 37375 to 23359 which gives add(37375, 23359) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 5915 which gives add(add(37375, 23359), 5915), The final logic expression is add(add(37375, 23359), 5915). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual contribution of the acquisition of firth rixson in the third-party sales in 2014? Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 1882 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 2021 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 1951 ; third-party sales for this segment increased 4% ( 4 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , primarily due to higher volumes and the acquisition of firth rixson ( $ 81 2014see above ) . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the acquisition of firth rixson divided by the total third-party sales . The required values from the context for the question are: Third-party sales in 2015: $1,882 million Third-party sales in 2014: $2,021 million Third-party sales in 2013: $1,951 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 81 by 2021 which gives divide(81, 2021) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(81, 2021), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(81, 2021), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as december 312011 what was the amount of the provision for impairment in billion Context: the provision for loan losses has declined for three consecutive years , down 72% ( 72 % ) from its peak of $ 1.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . ### Output: Logic: as december 312011 the amount of the provision for impairment in billion was 1.152 compared to 1.6 in 2008 The required values from the context for the question are: Anticipated annual cash dividend for Series A common stock: Approximately $25 million Price per share in the initial public offering of Series A common stock: $16 Annual cash dividend rate for Series A common stock in initial public offering: Approximately 1% (1%) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1.6 by 72% which gives multiply(1.6, 72%), The final logic expression is multiply(1.6, 72%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average of the total amount of expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans during the years 2016-2020 , in millions? Context: ( in millions ) the 2016-2020 of year is 62.8 ; ### Output: Logic: its the total value ( $ 62.8 ) divided by the period of years 2016-2020 ( 5 ) The required values from the context for the question are: Total for the years 2016-2020: $62.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 62.8 by const_5 which gives divide(62.8, const_5), The final logic expression is divide(62.8, const_5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average value for additions for tax positions of the current year? Context: unrecognized tax benefits the additions for tax positions of the current year of 2016 is 15.0 ; the additions for tax positions of the current year of 2015 is 6.9 ; the additions for tax positions of the current year of 2014 is 8.1 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all additions for tax positions of the current year divided by three ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Additions for tax positions of the current year in 2016: $15.0 million Additions for tax positions of the current year in 2015: $6.9 million Additions for tax positions of the current year in 2014: $8.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(additions for tax positions of the current year, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the average expense for environmental remediation at sites , in millions of dollars? Context: the company incurred $ 3.2 million , $ 23.3 million , and $ 4.4 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by the company . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all environmental remediation expenses during these years , divided by three ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Environmental remediation expenses in 2017: $3.2 million Environmental remediation expenses in 2016: $23.3 million Environmental remediation expenses in 2015: $4.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 3.2 to 23.3 which gives add(3.2, 23.3) step 2: add 4.4 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(4.4, add(3.2, 23.3)) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(4.4, add(3.2, 23.3)), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(4.4, add(3.2, 23.3)), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2014 what was the total mainline operating expenses in millions Context: year the 2014 of gallons is 3644 ; the 2014 of average price per gallon is $ 2.91 ; the 2014 of aircraft fuel expense is $ 10592 ; the 2014 of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the total operating expenses is derived as a result of dividing the fuel expenses by their percent of operating costs The required values from the context for the question are: Gallons in 2014: 3,644 Average price per gallon in 2014: $2.91 Aircraft fuel expense in 2014: $10,592 Percentage of total mainline operating expenses in 2014: 33.2% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 10592 by 33.2% which gives divide(10592, 33.2%), The final logic expression is divide(10592, 33.2%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the net benefit payments during 2012 and 2011? Context: the 2011 of benefit payments is 3561 ; the 2011 of expected subsidy receipts is 115 ; the 2011 of net benefit payments is 3446 ; the 2012 of benefit payments is 3994 ; the 2012 of expected subsidy receipts is 140 ; the 2012 of net benefit payments is 3854 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values of net benefit payments . The required values from the context for the question are: Benefit payments in 2011: $3,561 Expected subsidy receipts in 2011: $115 Net benefit payments in 2011: $3,446 Benefit payments in 2012: $3,994 Expected subsidy receipts in 2012: $140 Net benefit payments in 2012: $3,854 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3446 from 3854 which gives subtract(3854, 3446), The final logic expression is subtract(3854, 3446). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the amortization expense for the operating leases for facility and equipment from 2015 to 2014 in dollars Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 . ### Output: Logic: the change from one period to another is the difference between the 2 periods The required values from the context for the question are: Rental expenses under operating leases for 2015: $21 Rental expenses under operating leases for 2014: $22 Rental expenses under operating leases for 2013: $23 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21 from 22 which gives subtract(22, 21), The final logic expression is subtract(22, 21). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2015's charge , what is the impact of the industrial gases 2013 americas segment concerning the total expenses? Context: in fiscal year 2015 , we recognized an expense of $ 207.7 ( $ 153.2 after-tax , or $ .71 per share ) . the 2015 charges related to the segments as follows : $ 31.7 in industrial gases 2013 americas , $ 52.2 in industrial gases 2013 emea , $ 10.3 in industrial gases 2013 asia , $ 37.0 in industrial gases 2013 global , $ 27.6 in materials technologies , and $ 48.9 in corporate and other . ### Output: Logic: it is the expense related to the industrial gases 2013 americas segment divided by the total charge , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 total expense: $207.7 2015 industrial gases 2013 americas segment: $31.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 31.7 by 207.7 which gives divide(31.7, 207.7) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(31.7, 207.7), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(31.7, 207.7), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average volatility for 2017? Context: the volatility of 2017 is 20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % ) ; the volatility of 2016 is 18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % ) ; the volatility of 2015 is 15.41% ( 15.41 % ) - 16.04% ( 16.04 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of both percentages of 2017 divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: 2017 volatility range: 20.43% - 21.85% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 21.85% to 20.43% which gives add(21.85%, 20.43%) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(21.85%, 20.43%), const_2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(21.85%, 20.43%), const_2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(21.85%, 20.43%), const_2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the percentage of stock options that were excluded from the computation due to its anti-dilutive effect? Context: in millions the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2016 is 96.9 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2015 is 96.9 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2014 is 97.2 ; at december 31 , 2016 , 0.6 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of stocks that were excluded divided by the total number of weighted average diluted shares , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 0.6 million stock options 2016 weighted-average number of diluted shares: 96.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 0.6 by 96.9 which gives divide(0.6, 96.9) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(0.6, 96.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(0.6, 96.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest beginning balance observed during 2014-2016? Context: the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 506127 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 463018 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 223599 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value observed in this period . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 beginning balance: $506127 2015 beginning balance: $463018 2014 beginning balance: $223599 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(beginning balance, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease of the cash perfomance bonds in the years of 2009 and 2010 in millions? Context: ( in millions ) the cash performance bonds of 2010 is $ 3717.0 ; the cash performance bonds of 2009 is $ 5834.6 ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between those two values , in millions . The required values from the context for the question are: 2010 cash performance bonds: $3717.0 million 2009 cash performance bonds: $5834.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5834.6 from 3717.0 which gives subtract(3717.0, 5834.6), The final logic expression is subtract(3717.0, 5834.6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation of the additions during 2005 and 2006 , in thousands of dollars? Context: balance december 31 2004 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 595338 is 83656 ; balance december 31 2004 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 595338 is 89564 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those addition values . The required values from the context for the question are: 2005: Not provided (Possible error in the provided context) 2006: Not provided (Possible error in the provided context) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 83656 from 89564 which gives subtract(89564, 83656), The final logic expression is subtract(89564, 83656). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the ratio of the shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle to the 2006 performance plan issued in 2011 Context: during 2011 , the company issued approximately 1.2 million shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 0.3 million shares related to a 2006 performance plan . ### Output: Logic: in 2011 the company issued 4 shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle to the per share of the 2006 performance plan The required values from the context for the question are: 1.2 million (shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan) 0.3 million (shares related to a 2006 performance plan) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1.2 by 0.3 which gives divide(1.2, 0.3), The final logic expression is divide(1.2, 0.3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the credit spread between 2008 and 2009 , in millions of dollars? Context: ( in millions ) the december 31 2009 of 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread is $ 39 ; ( in millions ) the december 31 2008 of 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread is $ 37 ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the 2008's credit spread and the 2009's credit spread . The required values from the context for the question are: $ 39 (credit spread for December 31, 2009) $ 37 (credit spread for December 31, 2008) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 37 from 39 which gives subtract(39, 37), The final logic expression is subtract(39, 37). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the average operating loss? Context: the operating loss of 2017 is -170.6 ( 170.6 ) ; the operating loss of 2016 is -87.6 ( 87.6 ) ; the operating loss of 2015 is -86.5 ( 86.5 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all operating loss divided by three ( the sum of the years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: -170.6 (operating loss of 2017) -87.6 (operating loss of 2016) -86.5 (operating loss of 2015) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(operating loss, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the interest expense during 2012 and 2013? Context: the interest expense of 2014 is $ 125.1 ; the interest expense of 2013 is $ 141.8 ; the interest expense of 2012 is $ 123.7 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the total expenses in 2013 divided by the 2012's then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: $ 141.8 (interest expense of 2013) $ 123.7 (interest expense of 2012) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 141.8 by 123.7 which gives divide(141.8, 123.7) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(141.8, 123.7), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(141.8, 123.7), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(141.8, 123.7), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth , in a percentage , of the consolidated net sales from 2005 to 2007? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 9164 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005 is $ 9037 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 20142006 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2006 20142005 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 . ### Output: Logic: in line 17 it said the percentage of total segmented sales relative to consolidated net sales . you take this percentage and multiple it by the segmented net sales to get the consolidated net sales . then you must take these two products and subtract them from each other . this product is then divided by the the consolidated net sales in 2005 . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment Net Sales 2007: $10014 Segment Net Sales 2006: $9164 Segment Net Sales 2005: $9037 Net Sales 2007: 27% of Consolidated Net Sales 2006: 21% of Consolidated Net Sales 2005: 26% of Consolidated Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 9037 by 26% which gives multiply(9037, 26%) step 2: multiply 10014 by 27% which gives multiply(10014, 27%) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%)) step 4: multiply 9037 by 26% which gives multiply(9037, 26%) step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%)), multiply(9037, 26%)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%)), multiply(9037, 26%)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(10014, 27%), multiply(9037, 26%)), multiply(9037, 26%)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is going to be the matured value of the eurobond issued in 2013 , in millions? Context: additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . ### Output: Logic: it is the original $ 397 calculated in the compound interest formula , in which 2% is going to be the interest and 7 is going to be the period ( 2020-2013 ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Eurobond 2013: $397 Interest: 2.0% Maturity Period: 7 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 397 by exp(add(const_1, 2.0%), 7) which gives multiply(397, exp(add(const_1, 2.0%), 7)), The final logic expression is multiply(397, exp(add(const_1, 2.0%), 7)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of net sales was the consumer packaging segment in 2018? Context: ( in millions ) the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2018 is $ 16285.1 ; the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2017 is $ 14859.7 ; the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2016 is $ 14171.8 ; our consumer packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 838.9 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 7291.4 million from $ 6452.5 million in fiscal 2017 . ### Output: Logic: in line 36 , it gives us the amount of of net sales produced by the consumer packaging segment . to find the answer you take net sales subtract that by the number given in line 36 . then divide the solution by net sales . The required values from the context for the question are: Net Sales 2018: $16285.1 Consumer Packaging Segment 2018: $7291.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7291.4 from 16285.1 which gives subtract(16285.1, 7291.4) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 16285.1 which gives divide(subtract(16285.1, 7291.4), 16285.1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(16285.1, 7291.4), 16285.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(16285.1, 7291.4), 16285.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is due after 2023? Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 17 ; the 2020 of amount is 15 ; the 2021 of amount is 12 ; the 2022 of amount is 11 ; the 2023 of amount is 6 ; the thereafter of amount is 80 ; ### Output: Logic: from here you need to take the total due after 2023 , or 80 , and divide it by the total or 141 to get 56.7% The required values from the context for the question are: Amount due after 2023: 80 Total due: 141 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 17 to 15 which gives add(17, 15) step 2: add 12 to 11 which gives add(12, 11) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)) step 4: add 6 to 80 which gives add(6, 80) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), add(6, 80)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), add(6, 80)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), add(6, 80)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average of the principal payments scheduled from 2007 to 2011 Context: the total of total ( in $ millions ) is 3498 ; the thereafter ( 1 ) of total ( in $ millions ) is 1590 ; ### Output: Logic: the average of the 5 years The required values from the context for the question are: Total Principal Payments: 3498 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1590 from 3498 which gives subtract(3498, 1590) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to const_5 which gives add(subtract(3498, 1590), const_5) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_2 which gives divide(add(subtract(3498, 1590), const_5), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(subtract(3498, 1590), const_5), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage reduction in the shut down related costs as presented to the dod Context: the company has submitted a revised proposal to address the concerns of the dcaa and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $ 271 million . the defense contract audit agency ( 201cdcaa 201d ) , a dod agency , prepared an initial audit report on the company 2019s cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $ 310 million , which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the dcaa to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $ 25 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , of the costs submitted by the company . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from the current to most recent divide by the most recent The required values from the context for the question are: Revised Proposal: $271 million Initial Proposal: $310 million Questioned Costs: $25 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 310 from 271 which gives subtract(271, 310) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 310 which gives divide(subtract(271, 310), 310) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(271, 310), 310), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(271, 310), 310), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 292017 what was the percent of the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities to the net cash provided by operating activities Context: years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 292018 is -18607 ( 18607 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 302017 is -8475 ( 8475 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 312016 is -5739 ( 5739 ) ; years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 292018 is $ 29432 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 302017 is $ 22110 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 312016 is $ 21808 ; ### Output: Logic: as of december 292017 38.3% of net cash provided by operating activities was used for the ( used for ) financing activities The required values from the context for the question are: Net Cash Used for Financing 2017: -8475 Net Cash Provided by Operating 2017: $22110 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 8475 by 22110 which gives divide(8475, 22110) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(8475, 22110), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(8475, 22110), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the original value of patents and licenses , in dollars? Context: december 31 2015 the patents and licenses of gross carrying amount is 110 ; the patents and licenses of accumulated amortization is -98 ( 98 ) ; december 31 , 2015 carrying amount accumulated amortization . ### Output: Logic: the original value is calculated based upon the gross carrying amount formula , in which the carrying amount is equal to the original value mines the amortization/depreciation costs . The required values from the context for the question are: Gross Carrying Amount 2015: 110 Accumulated Amortization 2015: -98 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 110 to 98 which gives add(110, 98), The final logic expression is add(110, 98). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2008-2010 , what is the value of the average deductions?\\n Context: balance december 31 2008 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 846258 is -11869 ( 11869 ) ; balance december 31 2008 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 846258 is -11144 ( 11144 ) ; balance december 31 2008 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 846258 is -21796 ( 21796 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all deductions divided by the sum of the years . The required values from the context for the question are: Deductions 2008: -11869 Deductions 2009: -11144 Deductions 2010: -21796 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 11869 to 11144 which gives add(11869, 11144) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 21796 which gives add(add(11869, 11144), 21796) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(11869, 11144), 21796), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(11869, 11144), 21796), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2015 , what is the highest revenue? Context: the 2015 of first quarter is 22% ( 22 % ) ; the 2015 of second quarter is 25% ( 25 % ) ; the 2015 of third quarter is 26% ( 26 % ) ; the 2015 of fourth quarter is 27% ( 27 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of revenue for that year . The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 Q1 Revenue: 22% 2015 Q2 Revenue: 25% 2015 Q3 Revenue: 26% 2015 Q4 Revenue: 27% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_max(2015, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_max(2015, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_max(2015, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest initial balance observed during 2015-2017? Context: the balance at january 1 of 2017 is 1053027 ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is 1045640 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is 1149309 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value for this period . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance January 1, 2017: 1053027 Balance January 1, 2016: 1045640 Balance January 1, 2015: 1149309 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(balance at january 1, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of 2017 what was the total annual fuel expenses starting with 2015 in millions Context: year the 2016 of gallons is 4347 ; the 2016 of average priceper gallon is 1.42 ; the 2016 of aircraft fuelexpense is 6180 ; the 2016 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 17.7% ( 17.7 % ) ; year the 2017 of gallons is 4352 ; the 2017 of average priceper gallon is $ 1.73 ; the 2017 of aircraft fuelexpense is $ 7510 ; the 2017 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 19.7% ( 19.7 % ) ; year the 2015 of gallons is 4323 ; the 2015 of average priceper gallon is 1.72 ; the 2015 of aircraft fuelexpense is 7456 ; the 2015 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 21.4% ( 21.4 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the total is the sum of the expenses for each year The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 aircraft fuel expense: 7456 2016 aircraft fuel expense: 6180 2017 aircraft fuel expense: 7510 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6180 to 7510 which gives add(6180, 7510) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 7456 which gives add(add(6180, 7510), 7456), The final logic expression is add(add(6180, 7510), 7456). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012 and 2013 , what is the variation observed in the operating leases? Context: the 2012 of total is 50099 ; the 2012 of capital leases is 1819 ; the 2012 of operating leases is 9271 ; the 2012 of sponsorship licensing & other is 39009 ; the 2013 of total is 50012 ; the 2013 of capital leases is 36837 ; the 2013 of operating leases is 7062 ; the 2013 of sponsorship licensing & other is 6113 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between each year's operating leases . The required values from the context for the question are: 2012 operating leases: 9271 2013 operating leases: 7062 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7062 from 9271 which gives subtract(9271, 7062), The final logic expression is subtract(9271, 7062). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2011-2013 , what is the average value for settlements? Context: unrecognized tax benefits the settlements of 2013 is -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ; the settlements of 2012 is -11.0 ( 11.0 ) ; the settlements of 2011 is -15.6 ( 15.6 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sun of all settlements divided by three ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2011 settlements: -15.6 2012 settlements: -11.0 2013 settlements: -1.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(settlements, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables in relation with the total net of all collateral in 2018? Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a ) of 2018 is -15322 ( 15322 ) ; the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a ) of 2017 is -16108 ( 16108 ) ; december 31 ( in millions ) the total net of all collateral of 2018 is $ 38891 ; the total net of all collateral of 2017 is $ 40415 ; ### Output: Logic: its the division between the liquid securities and other cash collateral and total net of all collateral , in 2018 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2018 liquid securities and other cash collateral: -15322 2018 total net of all collateral: 38891 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 15322 by 38891 which gives divide(15322, 38891) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(15322, 38891), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(15322, 38891), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of the company's net assets are considered long-term assets? Context: current assets the long-term assets of $ 1922 is 253 ; current assets the net assets acquired of $ 1922 is $ 10000 ; the recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed , based upon their fair values as of july 1 , 2015 are set forth below: . ### Output: Logic: long term assets divided by net assets The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term assets: 253 Net assets: 10000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 253 by 10000 which gives divide(253, 10000) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(253, 10000), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(253, 10000), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2018? Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2554.7 ; the operating activities of 2017 is $ 2534.1 ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 2258.8 ; cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2018 is -1649.1 ( 1649.1 ) ; the investing activities of 2017 is -1417.7 ( 1417.7 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -864.8 ( 864.8 ) ; cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ; the financing activities of 2017 is -2040.9 ( 2040.9 ) ; the financing activities of 2016 is -860.2 ( 860.2 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2018 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2018 operating activities: 2554.7 2018 investing activities: -1649.1 2018 financing activities: -1359.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1649.1 from 2554.7 which gives subtract(2554.7, 1649.1) step 2: subtract 1359.8 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(2554.7, 1649.1), 1359.8), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(2554.7, 1649.1), 1359.8). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: if there were no loan sales in 2010 , what would the total amount of reserves available be , in millions , combined in 2010 and 2011 . Context: in millions the january 1 of 2011 is $ 54 ; the january 1 of 2010 is $ 71 ; in millions the loan sales of 2011 is ; the loan sales of 2010 is -24 ( 24 ) ; in millions the december 31 of 2011 is $ 47 ; the december 31 of 2010 is $ 54 ; the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . ### Output: Logic: add the 24m from the loan sales to the total number The required values from the context for the question are: January 1, 2010 reserves: 71 Loan sales 2010: -24 December 31, 2011 reserves: 47 December 31, 2010 reserves: 54 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 47 to 54 which gives add(47, 54) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 24 which gives add(add(47, 54), 24), The final logic expression is add(add(47, 54), 24). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase of trading during non u.s hours between 2009 and 2010? Context: the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2010 is 13% ( 13 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2009 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2008 is 11% ( 11 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: its the variation between those percentages . The required values from the context for the question are: 2009 trading during non-U.S. hours: 9% 2010 trading during non-U.S. hours: 13% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 9% from 13% which gives subtract(13%, 9%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(13%, 9%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(13%, 9%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 312012 what was the percentage change in tax positions from 2011 and favorable or unfavorable? Context: balance at january 1 2010 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 25621 is -2059 ( 2059 ) ; balance at january 1 2010 the balance at december 31 2011 of $ 25621 is $ 21579 ; ### Output: Logic: the change in tax position from year to year is the ( end balance less begin balance ) divide by the begin balance The required values from the context for the question are: (Note: The information needed to answer the question seems incomplete, but I've listed what's available.) Decreases in current period tax positions (2010): -2059 Balance at December 31, 2011: 21579 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 2059 by const_m1 which gives multiply(2059, const_m1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 21579 which gives divide(multiply(2059, const_m1), 21579) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(multiply(2059, const_m1), 21579), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(multiply(2059, const_m1), 21579), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: about how many more shares will the company still buy back in their repurchase plan if they paid $ 16.91 a share? Context: the december 1 - 31 of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 is 3323728 ; the december 1 - 31 of average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 is $ 17.07 ; the december 1 - 31 of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 is 3323728 ; the december 1 - 31 of maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3 is $ 118560581 ; repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . the total of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 is 11877706 ; the total of average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 is $ 16.91 ; the total of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 is 11876639 ; the total of maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3 is ; ### Output: Logic: the amount of money left over is given on the right side of the table . we take that amount of money and divide it by the share price in order to get the amount of shares that can be bought . The required values from the context for the question are: Maximum dollar value for shares that may yet be purchased: 118560581 Average price paid per share: 16.91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 118560581 by 16.91 which gives divide(118560581, 16.91), The final logic expression is divide(118560581, 16.91). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of shares purchased in november concerning the whole 2013 year? Context: period the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of average price paid per share is 98.18 ; the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is 664123417 ; period the total of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1994797 ; the total of average price paid per share is $ 100.56 ; the total of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 1994797 ; the total of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of shares purchased in november of 2013 divided by the total shares purchased in 2013 , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: November 2013 total number of shares purchased: 1191867 Total number of shares purchased for 2013: 1994797 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1191867 by 1994797 which gives divide(1191867, 1994797) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1191867, 1994797), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1191867, 1994797), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total net operating loss that must be utilized before expiration between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2033? Context: net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries totaling $ 12.4 million and u.s . net operating loss carryforwards previously acquired totaling $ 19.8 million at may 31 , 2015 will expire between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2033 if not utilized . capital loss carryforwards of u.s . ### Output: Logic: to calculate the total net operating loss that must be utilized , one must add the foreign subsidiaries net operating loss with the u.s . net operating loss . The required values from the context for the question are: Net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries: $12.4 million U.S. net operating loss carryforwards: $19.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 19.8 to 12.4 which gives add(19.8, 12.4), The final logic expression is add(19.8, 12.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the foreign exchange contracts , what is the difference between its average during 2008 and 2009? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 28.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 14.2 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 average is $ 21.6 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 high is $ 18.8 ; the foreign exchange contracts of june 30 2009 low is $ 5.3 ; the foreign exchange contracts of average is $ 11.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between these values.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Foreign exchange contracts average for June 30, 2009: $21.6 million Foreign exchange contracts average (seemingly another for 2009): $11.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 11.3 from 21.6 which gives subtract(21.6, 11.3), The final logic expression is subtract(21.6, 11.3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the amortized cost of contracts due in one year or less among the total? Context: ( millions ) the due in one year or less of amortizedcost is $ 50 ; the due in one year or less of fairvalue is $ 50 ; ( millions ) the total fixed maturities of amortizedcost is $ 150 ; the total fixed maturities of fairvalue is $ 150 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of those contracts divided by the total , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Amortized cost of contracts due in one year or less: $50 million Total fixed maturities of amortized cost: $150 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 50 by 150 which gives divide(50, 150) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(50, 150), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(50, 150), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in the dividend yield from 2009 to 2010 Context: the dividend yield of 2010 is 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2009 is 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference between the current and most recent divided by the most recent The required values from the context for the question are: Dividend yield for 2010: 2.9% Dividend yield for 2009: 3.6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3.6 from 2.9 which gives subtract(2.9, 3.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3.6 which gives divide(subtract(2.9, 3.6), 3.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2.9, 3.6), 3.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2.9, 3.6), 3.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the eog's roll forward of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets during 2015-2017 , what was the lowest value registered in the beginning balance? Context: the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 383221 ; the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 506127 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 463018 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value of this period . The required values from the context for the question are: Beginning balance for 2017: $383221 Beginning balance for 2016: $506127 Beginning balance for 2015: $463018 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(beginning balance, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in the total restricted cash and marketable securities from 2011 to 2012 Context: the total restricted cash and marketable securities of 2012 is $ 164.2 ; the total restricted cash and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 189.6 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period The required values from the context for the question are: Total restricted cash and marketable securities for 2012: $164.2 million Total restricted cash and marketable securities for 2011: $189.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 189.6 from 164.2 which gives subtract(164.2, 189.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 189.6 which gives divide(subtract(164.2, 189.6), 189.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(164.2, 189.6), 189.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(164.2, 189.6), 189.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization between 2017 and 2018? Context: the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2018 is -31674085 ( 31674085 ) ; the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2017 is -29191247 ( 29191247 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of these years . The required values from the context for the question are: Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2018: -31674085 Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2017: -29191247 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 29191247 from 31674085 which gives subtract(31674085, 29191247), The final logic expression is subtract(31674085, 29191247). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percent did the income tax benefit increase from 2014 to 2016? Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2016 is $ 30809 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 21056 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 is $ 29793 ; the income tax benefit of 2016 is $ 9879 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 6907 ; the income tax benefit of 2014 is $ 7126 ; the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . ### Output: Logic: the tax benefit increased 38.6% , one can find this by subtracting 2016 by 2014 tax benefits . then taking the answer and dividing it by 2014 tax benefits . The required values from the context for the question are: Income tax benefit for 2016: $9879 Income tax benefit for 2014: $7126 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7126 from 9879 which gives subtract(9879, 7126) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7126 which gives divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the service revenue as of december 312016 in millions as filed? Context: ( in millions ) the net income of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 1460 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 as adjusted is 1460 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 733 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014 ; the net income of as adjusted is 733 ; ( in millions ) the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014% ( 2014 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 as adjusted is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 as filed is 3% ( 3 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle is 2014% ( 2014 % ) ; the net income as a percentage of service revenue of as adjusted is 3% ( 3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the service revenue was derived based on the net income and net income as a percent of service revenue provided The required values from the context for the question are: Net income of year ended December 31, 2016 as filed: 1460 (in millions) Net income as a percentage of service revenue of year ended December 31, 2016 as filed: 5% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1460 by 5% which gives divide(1460, 5%), The final logic expression is divide(1460, 5%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase percentage of trading during the us hours between 2008 and 2009? Context: the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2010 is 13% ( 13 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2009 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the trading during non-u.s . hours of 2008 is 11% ( 11 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the variation of the total percentage of trading hours ( 100% ) and the trading in non us hours ( 9% ) in 2009 and the variation of the total percentage of trading hours ( 100% ) and the trading in non us hours ( 11% ) in 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: non-u.s. hours 2009: 9% non-u.s. hours 2008: 11% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 11 from const_100 which gives subtract(const_100, 11) step 2: subtract 9 from const_100 which gives subtract(const_100, 9) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(const_100, 9), subtract(const_100, 11)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(const_100, 9), subtract(const_100, 11)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(const_100, 9), subtract(const_100, 11)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the ratio of the expected benefit payments for 2009 to 2010 Context: 2009 the 2010 of $ 19766 is 18182 ; ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the expected benefit payments in 2009 to 2010 was 1.087 The required values from the context for the question are: 2010: $ 19766 2009: $ 18182 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 19766 by 18182 which gives divide(19766, 18182), The final logic expression is divide(19766, 18182). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for the year ended december 31 2008 what was the net profit margin Context: the revenue of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is $ 9362.2 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is 285.7 ; ### Output: Logic: net profit margin is the ratio of the net income to the revenues The required values from the context for the question are: revenue 2008: $ 9362.2 net income 2008: $ 285.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 285.7 by 9362.2 which gives divide(285.7, 9362.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of future annual commitments related to minimum quantities of purchased water having non-cancelable are due in 2020? Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 65 ; the 2020 of amount is 65 ; the 2021 of amount is 65 ; the 2022 of amount is 64 ; the 2023 of amount is 57 ; the thereafter of amount is 641 ; ### Output: Logic: from here you need to take the amount due in 2020 , or 65 , and divide by the total or $ 957 to get 6.8% The required values from the context for the question are: 2020 amount: $ 65 total amount: $ 957 (from all provided years) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 65 to 65 which gives add(65, 65) step 2: add 65 to 64 which gives add(65, 64) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)) step 4: add 57 to 641 which gives add(57, 641) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase of the expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans in 2011 compared with 2010 , in millions? Context: ( in millions ) the 2011 of year is $ 7.2 ; aggregate expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans amounted to $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 5.8 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: its the variation between the total amount of expenses with saving plans in 2010 ( $ 6.3 millions ) and 2011 ( $ 7.2 millions ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2011 expense: $ 7.2 million 2010 expense: $ 6.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6.3 from 7.2 which gives subtract(7.2, 6.3), The final logic expression is subtract(7.2, 6.3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the total incentive compensation from 2017 to 2018 Context: in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 2021 ; the total of 2017 is $ 2251 ; the total of 2016 is $ 2183 ; ### Output: Logic: the total incentive compensation declined by 10.3% from 2017 to 2018 The required values from the context for the question are: total 2018: $ 2021 total 2017: $ 2251 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2251 from 2021 which gives subtract(2021, 2251) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2251 which gives divide(subtract(2021, 2251), 2251) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2021, 2251), 2251), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2021, 2251), 2251), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the reserves for environmental matters during 2016 and 2017? Context: as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company has recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value of reserves ( $ 28.9 ) minus the initial one ( $ 30.6 ) , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage to represent the decrease . The required values from the context for the question are: reserves 2017: $ 28.9 million reserves 2016: $ 30.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 30.6 from 28.9 which gives subtract(28.9, 30.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 30.6 which gives divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 30.6), 30.6), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the change in the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted from 2016 to 2017 Context: incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted increased by 15.5% from 2016 to 2017 The required values from the context for the question are: fair value 2017: $ 84.53 fair value 2016: $ 73.20 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 73.20 from 84.53 which gives subtract(84.53, 73.20) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 73.20 which gives divide(subtract(84.53, 73.20), 73.20) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(84.53, 73.20), 73.20), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(84.53, 73.20), 73.20), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total value of assets , in thousands? Context: the cash and cash equivalents of ( in thousands ) is $ 92116 ; the premiums receivable and other current assets of ( in thousands ) is 6510 ; the property and equipment and other assets of ( in thousands ) is 21315 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all assets . The required values from the context for the question are: cash and cash equivalents: $ 92116 (in thousands) premiums receivable and other current assets: $ 6510 (in thousands) property and equipment and other assets: $ 21315 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6510 to 92116 which gives add(6510, 92116) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 21315 which gives add(add(6510, 92116), 21315), The final logic expression is add(add(6510, 92116), 21315). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average expense for the significant plans in the u.s.? Context: years ended december 31 the u.s . of 2018 is $ 98 ; the u.s . of 2017 is $ 105 ; the u.s . of 2016 is $ 121 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all expenses for the significant plans divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: U.S. 2018: $ 98 U.S. 2017: $ 105 U.S. 2016: $ 121 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(u.s ., none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the debt to asset ratio? Context: the total assets acquired of amount ( in millions ) is 1020 ; the total liabilities assumed of amount ( in millions ) is 684 ; ### Output: Logic: debt to asset ratio = total liabilities/total assets The required values from the context for the question are: Total assets: 1020 (in millions) Total liabilities: 684 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 684 by 1020 which gives divide(684, 1020), The final logic expression is divide(684, 1020). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage growth of the vornado realty trust from 2005 to 2006 Context: the vornado realty trust of 2005 is 100 ; the vornado realty trust of 2006 is 151 ; the vornado realty trust of 2007 is 113 ; the vornado realty trust of 2008 is 81 ; the vornado realty trust of 2009 is 100 ; the vornado realty trust of 2010 is 124 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage growth is the growth amount divided by the base amount The required values from the context for the question are: Vornado Realty Trust 2005: 100 Vornado Realty Trust 2006: 151 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 151 which gives subtract(151, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(151, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(151, 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated value , in dollars , of the total number of shares purchased between 9/30/07 and 10/26/07? Context: period the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 2972951 ; the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( b ) average price paid per share ( 1 ) ( 3 ) is $ 18.84 ; the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 ) is 2964225 ; the 9/30/07 to 10/26/07 of ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 ) is $ 4267375081 ; ### Output: Logic: estimated amount since price per share is average The required values from the context for the question are: Total number of shares purchased (9/30/07 to 10/26/07): 2972951 Average price paid per share (9/30/07 to 10/26/07): $18.84 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 18.84 by 2972951 which gives multiply(18.84, 2972951), The final logic expression is multiply(18.84, 2972951). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what did the make-whole settlements increase the total repurchase liability at the end of the period in 2012 Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the repurchase liability at end of period of 2014 is $ 275 ; the repurchase liability at end of period of 2013 is $ 681 ; the repurchase liability at end of period of 2012 is $ 2811 ; ( b ) presented net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans , 201cmake-whole 201d settlements , settlements with claimants , and certain related expense . make-whole settlements were $ 11 million , $ 414 million and $ 524 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ( c ) included a provision related to new loan sales of $ 4 million , $ 20 million and $ 112 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans would increase the total amount of money . The required values from the context for the question are: Repurchase liability at end of period 2012: $2811 (in millions) Make-whole settlements 2012: $524 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2811 to 524 which gives add(2811, 524), The final logic expression is add(2811, 524). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the estimated future pension benefit payments increase from 2011 to 2012 Context: 2009 the 2011 of $ 14.9 is 16.2 ; 2009 the 2012 of $ 14.9 is 19.2 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference show above divide by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: 2011 benefit payments: $16.2 2012 benefit payments: $19.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 16.2 from 19.2 which gives subtract(19.2, 16.2) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 16.2 which gives divide(subtract(19.2, 16.2), 16.2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(19.2, 16.2), 16.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(19.2, 16.2), 16.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change in the allowance in doubtful accounts in 2009 Context: the provision of 2010 is 38 ; the provision of 2009 is 54 ; the provision of 2008 is 65 ; the amounts written off of 2010 is -13 ( 13 ) ; the amounts written off of 2009 is -27 ( 27 ) ; the amounts written off of 2008 is -18 ( 18 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net change for the period is the increase plus the decrease The required values from the context for the question are: Provision for 2009: 54 Amounts written off for 2009: -27 (27) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 54 to -27 which gives add(54, -27), The final logic expression is add(54, -27). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the equity income in drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco from 2007 to 2007 for schlumberger Context: schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from one period to the next divided by the original period The required values from the context for the question are: Equity income 2007: $178 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 178 from 210 which gives subtract(210, 178) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 178 which gives divide(subtract(210, 178), 178), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(210, 178), 178). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the low and average foreign exchange contracts , in millions of dollars? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 high is $ 27.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 low is $ 7.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 average is $ 18.9 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: High foreign exchange contracts 2014: $27.4 (in millions) Low foreign exchange contracts 2014: $7.4 (in millions) Average foreign exchange contracts 2014: $18.9 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7.4 from 18.9 which gives subtract(18.9, 7.4), The final logic expression is subtract(18.9, 7.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the asr agreement , what will be the total value associated with the repurchase program of common stock , in millions of dollars? Context: on february 19 , 2019 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( 201casr 201d ) agreement with jpmorgan chase bank to repurchase $ 700 of its common stock , pursuant to the share repurchase program previously authorized by the board . under the asr agreement , arconic will receive initial delivery of approximately 32 million shares on february 21 , 2019 . ### Output: Logic: it is the price per repurchased share multiplied by the total amount of shares delivered . The required values from the context for the question are: Amount for repurchase under ASR agreement: $700 (of common stock) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 700 by 32 which gives multiply(700, 32), The final logic expression is multiply(700, 32). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31 , 2009 , what was the percent unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken by allied prior to the merger . Context: as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 211.9 million of the $ 242.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken by allied prior to the merger . ### Output: Logic: the percent is the difference in the amounts divide by the earliest amount The required values from the context for the question are: Unrecognized tax benefits related to Allied pre-merger: $211.9 million Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009: $242.2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 211.9 by 242.2 which gives divide(211.9, 242.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(211.9, 242.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(211.9, 242.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total research and development from december 312017 to 2015 in millions Context: research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the total amount is the sum of all amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Research and development expense 2017: $72 million Research and development expense 2016: $78 million Research and development expense 2015: $119 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 72 to 78 which gives add(72, 78) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 119 which gives add(add(72, 78), 119), The final logic expression is add(add(72, 78), 119). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how many years does the irs have under examination? Context: the of 2011 is 2011 ; the of 2010 is 2010 ; the of 2009 is 2009 ; the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . ### Output: Logic: 2006 is the last closed year . The required values from the context for the question are: IRS examination years: 2004, 2005, 2006 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2006 from 2009 which gives subtract(2009, 2006), The final logic expression is subtract(2009, 2006). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total amount of unvested shares gifted by the company during the three year period? Context: the unvested at may 31 2013 of shares is 1096 ; the unvested at may 31 2013 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 44 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of shares is 877 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 45 ; the unvested at may 31 2015 of shares is 924 ; the unvested at may 31 2015 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 58 ; the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2015 and 2014 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report 2013 81 . ### Output: Logic: to find out the total amount of unvested shares the company one must added up the shares given by the company over the course of the three years . The required values from the context for the question are: Unvested shares on May 31, 2013: 1096 Unvested shares on May 31, 2014: 877 Unvested shares on May 31, 2015: 924 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1096 to 877 which gives add(1096, 877) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 924 which gives add(add(1096, 877), 924), The final logic expression is add(add(1096, 877), 924). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012-2013 , what is the increase observed in the special terminations settlements and curtailments? Context: the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2013 is 19.8 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2012 is 8.2 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2011 is 1.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2013 value divided by the 2012's , then turned into a percentage and subtracted 100% . The required values from the context for the question are: Special terminations settlements and curtailments in 2013: 19.8 Special terminations settlements and curtailments in 2012: 8.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 19.8 by 8.2 which gives divide(19.8, 8.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100) step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(19.8, 8.2), const_100), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total income tax benefit that came from buying back their common stock from 2013 to 2015? Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2015 is $ 21.1 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ 29.8 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2013 is $ 18.4 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 is $ -6.9 ( 6.9 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ -7.1 ( 7.1 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2013 is $ -5.6 ( 5.6 ) ; 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . ### Output: Logic: to calculate the income tax benefit one would need to add up the income tax benefit for the years of 2013 , 2014 , and 2015 . The required values from the context for the question are: Income tax benefit in 2015: -6.9 Income tax benefit in 2014: -7.1 Income tax benefit in 2013: -5.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6.9 to 7.1 which gives add(6.9, 7.1) step 2: add 5.6 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)), The final logic expression is add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much higher are the returns of the s&p 500 in the same period ( 2008-2013 ) ? as a percentage . Context: the state street corporation of 2008 is $ 100 ; the state street corporation of 2009 is $ 111 ; the state street corporation of 2010 is $ 118 ; the state street corporation of 2011 is $ 105 ; the state street corporation of 2012 is $ 125 ; the state street corporation of 2013 is $ 198 ; the s&p 500 index of 2008 is 100 ; the s&p 500 index of 2009 is 126 ; the s&p 500 index of 2010 is 146 ; the s&p 500 index of 2011 is 149 ; the s&p 500 index of 2012 is 172 ; the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 228 ; the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . ### Output: Logic: used result from question 1 The required values from the context for the question are: S&P 500 index in 2008: 100 S&P 500 index in 2013: 228 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 228 by 100 which gives divide(228, 100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives divide(divide(228, 100), 100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(divide(228, 100), 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(divide(228, 100), 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of non-same store revenue among the total revenue in 2014? Context: the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2014 is 493349 ; the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2013 is 151185 ; the non-same store and other of increase is 342164 ; the non-same store and other of percentage increase is 226.3% ( 226.3 % ) ; the total of year ended december 31 2014 is $ 992178 ; the total of year ended december 31 2013 is $ 634843 ; the total of increase is $ 357335 ; the total of percentage increase is 56.3% ( 56.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the revenue of the non-same store divided by the total revenue , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Non-same store revenue in 2014: 493349 Total revenue in 2014: 992178 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 493349 by 992178 which gives divide(493349, 992178) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(493349, 992178), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(493349, 992178), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth in the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations from 2017 to 2018 Context: the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations of 2018 is $ 349.4 ; the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations of 2017 is $ 324.8 ; the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations of 2016 is $ 324.1 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth is based on the subtraction of the current from the prior period amount divide by the prior period The required values from the context for the question are: Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018: 349.4 Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2017: 324.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 324.8 from 349.4 which gives subtract(349.4, 324.8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 324.8 which gives divide(subtract(349.4, 324.8), 324.8) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(349.4, 324.8), 324.8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(349.4, 324.8), 324.8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 , how much was lost due to the decrease in net income? Context: operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . ### Output: Logic: to figure out the decrease in net income , one must take total change without net income and subtract it by the change between the years . this should give you $ 47.9 million . The required values from the context for the question are: Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013: 592.9 Increase from 2012: 235.7 Improvement in working capital usage: 283.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 235.7 from 283.6 which gives subtract(283.6, 235.7), The final logic expression is subtract(283.6, 235.7). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the lease expenses after 2021 as a part of the total amount Context: 2016 the 2021 and thereafter of $ 2266 is 7844 ; 2016 the total of $ 2266 is $ 20807 ; ### Output: Logic: to find the percent , divide the amount by the total The required values from the context for the question are: Lease expenses after 2021: 7844 Total amount in 2016: 20807 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 7844 by 20807 which gives divide(7844, 20807) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(7844, 20807), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(7844, 20807), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations are long-term debt obligations? Context: ( in millions ) the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is $ 4033 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006 is $ 119 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is $ 1222 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is $ 200 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is $ 2 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is $ 529 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is $ 1961 ; ( in millions ) the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is $ 6175 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006 is $ 975 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is $ 1440 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is $ 337 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is $ 113 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is $ 615 ; the total contractual obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is $ 2695 ; debt obligations : at december 31 , 2005 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.0 billion , as compared to $ 5.0 billion at december 31 , 2004 . ### Output: Logic: to figure out this percentage you need to divide long term debt obligations by total contractual obligations . The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt obligations total: 4033 Total contractual obligations total: 6175 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4033 by 6175 which gives divide(4033, 6175) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4033, 6175), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4033, 6175), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the expected increase in the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 , in comparison with 2019? Context: in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 divided by the 2019's , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Amortization of actuarial losses in 2020: 105 Amortization of actuarial losses in 2019: 76.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 105 by 76.2 which gives divide(105, 76.2) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(105, 76.2), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(105, 76.2), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(105, 76.2), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total income tax benefit that came from buying back their common stock from 2013 to 2015? Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2015 is $ 21.1 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ 29.8 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2013 is $ 18.4 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 is $ -6.9 ( 6.9 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ -7.1 ( 7.1 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2013 is $ -5.6 ( 5.6 ) ; 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . ### Output: Logic: to calculate the income tax benefit one would need to add up the income tax benefit for the years of 2013 , 2014 , and 2015 . The required values from the context for the question are: Income tax benefit 2015: $-6.9 Income tax benefit 2014: $-7.1 Income tax benefit 2013: $-5.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 6.9 to 7.1 which gives add(6.9, 7.1) step 2: add 5.6 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)), The final logic expression is add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the sales during 2013 and 2014? Context: the sales of 2014 is $ 8.5 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 52.3 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 258.0 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual variation observed , which is calculated using the initial value ( 52.3 ) and the final value ( 8.5 ) then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Sales 2014: $8.5 Sales 2013: $52.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 52.3 from 8.5 which gives subtract(8.5, 52.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 52.3 which gives divide(subtract(8.5, 52.3), 52.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(8.5, 52.3), 52.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(8.5, 52.3), 52.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percent did the investor make on applied materials from the first 5 years compared to the 2016 to 2017 time period ? ( not including compound interest ) Context: the applied materials of 10/28/2012 is 100.00 ; the applied materials of 10/27/2013 is 171.03 ; the applied materials of 10/26/2014 is 207.01 ; the applied materials of 10/25/2015 is 165.34 ; the applied materials of 10/30/2016 is 293.64 ; the applied materials of 10/29/2017 is 586.91 ; applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . ### Output: Logic: to see the difference between the years one will need to calculate the total percentage change over those years . for the first 5 years its pretty easy because we started with $ 100 making it a 193% return . for the years 2016 to 2017 , one needs to subtract the starting price by the ending price and then divide that number by the starting price . this gives us a 99.9% return in 2016 to 2017 . The required values from the context for the question are: Applied materials 10/28/2012: 100.00 Applied materials 10/30/2016: 293.64 Applied materials 10/29/2017: 586.91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 293.64 from 586.91 which gives subtract(586.91, 293.64) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 293.64 which gives divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64) step 3: subtract const_100 from 293.64 which gives subtract(293.64, const_100) step 4: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent growth or decline of research & engineering as a percent of revenue from 2010 to 2011 Context: the research & engineering of 2011 is 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) ; the research & engineering of 2010 is 3.3% ( 3.3 % ) ; the research & engineering of 2009 is 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the difference in amounts from one period to another divided by the initial period The required values from the context for the question are: Research & Engineering 2011: 2.7% Research & Engineering 2010: 3.3% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3.3 from 2.7 which gives subtract(2.7, 3.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3.3 which gives divide(subtract(2.7, 3.3), 3.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2.7, 3.3), 3.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2.7, 3.3), 3.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of reit index as of 12/31/2003 Context: the all reit index of 12/31/2002 is $ 100 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2003 is $ 138 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2004 is $ 181 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2005 is $ 196 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2006 is $ 262 ; the all reit index of 12/31/2007 is $ 215 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from year to year divided by the original year amount The required values from the context for the question are: All REIT index 12/31/2002: $100 All REIT index 12/31/2003: $138 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 138 which gives subtract(138, const_100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(138, const_100), const_100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(138, const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(138, const_100), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the unconditional purchase obligations during 2016 and 2017? Context: 2016 the 2017 of $ 917 is 117 ; unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual variation observed during these years , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value ( 2016 ) of the final one ( 2017 ) then dividing by the initial and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 amount: $917 2017 amount: 117 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 917 from 117 which gives subtract(117, 917) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 917 which gives divide(subtract(117, 917), 917) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(117, 917), 917), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(117, 917), 917), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the operating income in 2014 Context: the operating revenues of 2014 is $ 13 ; the operating revenues of 2013 is $ 23 ; the total operating expenses net of 2014 is 19 ; the total operating expenses net of 2013 is 26 ; ### Output: Logic: the operating income is the operating revenues less operating expenses The required values from the context for the question are: Operating revenues 2014: $13 Total operating expenses 2014: 19 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 19 from 13 which gives subtract(13, 19), The final logic expression is subtract(13, 19). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is payable after 2022? Context: the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ; the 2019 of amount is 14 ; the 2020 of amount is 12 ; the 2021 of amount is 9 ; the 2022 of amount is 8 ; the thereafter of amount is 65 ; ### Output: Logic: from here you need to than divide the amount to be paid after 2022 or 65 by the total or 123 ( 65/123 ) to get 52.8% The required values from the context for the question are: Amount payable after 2022: 65 Total amounts (2018-2022 and thereafter): 15+14+12+9+8+65 = 123 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 15 to 14 which gives add(15, 14) step 2: add 12 to 9 which gives add(12, 9) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)) step 4: add 8 to 65 which gives add(8, 65) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net effect of the one percentage point change on the other post retirement benefit obligations combined Context: the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-point increase is $ 105967 ; the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-point decrease is $ -86179 ( 86179 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net effect on the other post retirement benefits is the sum of the decrease and increase The required values from the context for the question are: Effect of one-percentage-point increase: $105967 Effect of one-percentage-point decrease: $-86179 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 105967 to -86179 which gives add(105967, -86179), The final logic expression is add(105967, -86179). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the company's net valuation allowance at the end of 2013? Context: balance at january 1 2011 the balance at december 31 2013 of $ 23788 is $ 13555 ; included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . ### Output: Logic: in order to get the net valuation allowance you need to take out any special one time non-recurring revenues or expenses . since the discrete tax benefit is already included in the ending 2013 balance , you need to take it out to get to the net number The required values from the context for the question are: Balance at December 31, 2013: $23788 Discrete tax benefit: $2979 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2979 from 13555 which gives subtract(13555, 2979), The final logic expression is subtract(13555, 2979). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the fourth quarter , what is the variation between the low trading stock prices during 2014 and 2015? Context: quarter the fourth of 2015 high is 11.18 ; the fourth of 2015 low is 7.81 ; the fourth of 2015 dividend is 0.03 ; the fourth of 2015 high is 17.75 ; the fourth of 2015 low is 13.71 ; the fourth of dividend is 0.03 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those two prices during 2015 and 2014 . The required values from the context for the question are: the fourth of 2015 low: 7.81 the fourth of 2015 low: 13.71 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7.81 from 13.71 which gives subtract(13.71, 7.81), The final logic expression is subtract(13.71, 7.81). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2017-2018 , what is the decrease observed in the weighted-average number of diluted shares? Context: in millions the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018 is 95.7 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017 is 96.0 ; the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2016 is 96.9 ; the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value ( 95.7 ) minus the initial value ( 96 ) , then divided by the initial one and turned into a percentage to represent the decrease . The required values from the context for the question are: the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018: 95.7 the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017: 96.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 96.0 from 95.7 which gives subtract(95.7, 96.0) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 96.0 which gives divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(95.7, 96.0), 96.0), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of the balance was used on payments . Context: balance at may 31 2012 the payments of $ 67436 is -35655 ( 35655 ) ; the following table reflects the activity in our accrual for fraud losses , fines and other charges for the twelve months ended may 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) : . ### Output: Logic: to figure out the percentage payments are , one must divide payments by the balance . The required values from the context for the question are: payments: 67436 balance at may 31 2012: -35655 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 35655 by 67436 which gives divide(35655, 67436) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(35655, 67436), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(35655, 67436), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012 and 2013 , what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year? Context: unrecognized tax benefits the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 124.3 ; the balance at end of year of 2012 is $ 110.8 ; the balance at end of year of 2011 is $ 126.4 ; ### Output: Logic: is the balance of 2013 divided by the 2012's then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: balance at end of year of 2013: $ 124.3 balance at end of year of 2012: $ 110.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 124.3 by 110.8 which gives divide(124.3, 110.8) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the change in annual rental expenses from 2015 to 2016 in dollars Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 . year the 2016 of amount is $ 13 ; ### Output: Logic: the change from one period to another is the difference between the 2 periods The required values from the context for the question are: rental expenses under operating leases for 2015: $ 21 year the 2016 of amount: $ 13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 13 from 21 which gives subtract(21, 13), The final logic expression is subtract(21, 13). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest income from performance plans? Context: years ended december 31 the performance plans of 2009 is 60 ; the performance plans of 2008 is 67 ; the performance plans of 2007 is 54 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value . The required values from the context for the question are: performance plans of 2009: 60 performance plans of 2008: 67 performance plans of 2007: 54 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(performance plans, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent change in free cash flow from 2015 to 2016 Context: the free cash flow of 2017 is $ 927.0 ; the free cash flow of 2016 is $ 929.8 ; the free cash flow of 2015 is $ 755.3 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is equal to the difference in the amounts based on the recent and earliest divide by the earliest The required values from the context for the question are: free cash flow of 2016: $ 929.8 free cash flow of 2015: $ 755.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 755.3 from 929.8 which gives subtract(929.8, 755.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 755.3 which gives divide(subtract(929.8, 755.3), 755.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(929.8, 755.3), 755.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(929.8, 755.3), 755.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the weighted average fair value of options , what was the decrease between shares that vested in 2006 and 2005? Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006 is $ 20.01 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2005 is $ 9.48 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2004 is $ 7.28 ; the total fair value of shares vested during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 was $ 9413 , $ 8249 , and $ 6418 respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the total fair value of options that vested in 2005 divided by its weighted average fair value also in 2005 minus the total fair value of options that vested in 2006 divided by its weighted average fair value in 2006 . The required values from the context for the question are: weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006: $ 20.01 weighted average fair value of options granted of 2005: $ 9.48 total fair value of shares vested during 2006: $ 9413 total fair value of shares vested during 2005: $ 8249 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 9413 by 20.01 which gives divide(9413, 20.01) step 2: divide 8249 by 9.48 which gives divide(8249, 9.48) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(8249, 9.48), divide(9413, 20.01)), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(8249, 9.48), divide(9413, 20.01)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the short-term debt as a percent of long-term debt , in 2019? Context: 30 september the short-term borrowings of 2019 is $ 58.2 ; the short-term borrowings of 2018 is $ 54.3 ; 30 september the long-term debt of 2019 is 2907.3 ; the long-term debt of 2018 is 2967.4 ; 30 september the long-term debt 2013 related party ( b ) of 2019 is 320.1 ; the long-term debt 2013 related party ( b ) of 2018 is 384.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the short-term debt divided by the long-term debt ( the sum of both long-term debts ) , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: short-term borrowings of 2019: $ 58.2 long-term debt of 2019: 2907.3 long-term debt 2013 related party (b) of 2019: 320.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2907.3 to 320.1 which gives add(2907.3, 320.1) step 2: divide 58.2 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(58.2, add(2907.3, 320.1)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(58.2, add(2907.3, 320.1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(58.2, add(2907.3, 320.1)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in the cash provided by operating activities from 2007 to 2008 Context: the cash provided by operating activities of 2009 is $ 1396.5 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2008 is $ 512.2 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2007 is $ 661.3 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage decline is the difference between the most current and prior amount divide by the prior amount The required values from the context for the question are: cash provided by operating activities of 2008: $ 512.2 cash provided by operating activities of 2007: $ 661.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 661.3 from 512.2 which gives subtract(512.2, 661.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 661.3 which gives divide(subtract(512.2, 661.3), 661.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(512.2, 661.3), 661.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(512.2, 661.3), 661.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2013 charge , what is the impact of the merchant gases segment on the total charge? Context: the 2013 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 71.9 ; the 2013 charge of asset actions is $ 100.4 ; the 2013 charge of contract actions/ other is $ 59.3 ; the 2013 charge of total is $ 231.6 ; the 2013 charges relate to the businesses at the segment level as follows : $ 61.0 in merchant gases , $ 28.6 in tonnage gases , $ 141.0 in electronics and performance materials , and $ 1.0 in equipment and energy . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the merchant gases segment divided by the total charge , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2013 charge of total: $ 231.6 2013 charges merchant gases: $ 61.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 61.0 by 231.6 which gives divide(61.0, 231.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(61.0, 231.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(61.0, 231.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the affect of the change in accounting principles on other intangible assets net in millions? Context: consolidated balance sheet the other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as reported is $ 57.2 ; the other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as adjusted is $ 33.5 ; ### Output: Logic: size of the write down due to change The required values from the context for the question are: other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as reported: $ 57.2 other intangible assets net of as of december 31 2013 as adjusted: $ 33.5 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 57.2 from 33.5 which gives subtract(33.5, 57.2), The final logic expression is subtract(33.5, 57.2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2020-2021 , what is the difference between the growth of the projected benefit payments in the u.s . and international? Context: the 2020 of u.s . is 152.4 ; the 2020 of international is 53.9 ; the 2021 of u.s . is 157.0 ; the 2021 of international is 55.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between the percentual increase of each estimated benefit payment . The required values from the context for the question are: 2020 of U.S.: 152.4 2020 of international: 53.9 2021 of U.S.: 157.0 2021 of international: 55.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 157.0 by 152.4 which gives divide(157.0, 152.4) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1) step 3: divide 55.6 by 53.9 which gives divide(55.6, 53.9) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1), subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1), subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(55.6, 53.9), const_1), subtract(divide(157.0, 152.4), const_1)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the number of dollars obtained with the sale of primary aluminum in 2015? Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5591 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 6800 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 6596 ; the sale of primary aluminum represents approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of this segment 2019s third-party sales . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of third-party sales multiplied by 90% . The required values from the context for the question are: Third-party sales of 2015: $5591 Percentage of primary aluminum sales: 90% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 90% by 5591 which gives multiply(90%, 5591), The final logic expression is multiply(90%, 5591). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the additional discrete income tax charge for valuation allowances in 2015 , what is the percentage of the valuation allowance of the deferred tax assets recorded in iceland? Context: in 2015 , alcoa recognized an additional $ 141 discrete income tax charge for valuation allowances on certain deferred tax assets in iceland and suriname . the remaining $ 56 charge relates to a valuation allowance established on a portion of the deferred tax assets recorded in iceland . ### Output: Logic: it is iceland's valuation allowance of the deferred tax assets divided by the total additional discrete income tax charge for valuation allowances , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 additional discrete income tax charge: $141 Valuation allowance in Iceland: $56 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 56 by 141 which gives divide(56, 141) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(56, 141), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(56, 141), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 2007 what was the approximate total of the total commercial medical membership Context: to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . the total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership is 564700 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2886900 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3451600 ; these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . ### Output: Logic: as of december 2007 the approximate total of the total commercial medical membership was 3443292.68 The required values from the context for the question are: Total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership: 564700 Total commercial medical of other commercial membership: 2886900 Total commercial medical of commercial medical membership: 3451600 Percentage of smart plans and other consumer membership to total commercial medical membership: 16.4% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 564700 by 16.4 which gives divide(564700, 16.4), The final logic expression is divide(564700, 16.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the netting adjustment of the additional collateral in 2009 , in millions of dollars? Context: at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the collateral received and delivered . The required values from the context for the question are: Collateral received in 2009: $16.9 billion Collateral delivered in 2009: $5.8 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5.8 from 16.9 which gives subtract(16.9, 5.8), The final logic expression is subtract(16.9, 5.8). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much has cash equivalents and marketable securities decreased from 2014 to 2016? Context: balance sheet data the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2016 is $ 1100.6 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2015 is $ 1509.7 ; management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014. . ### Output: Logic: to find the amount of cash equivalent and marketable securities in 2014 , one needs to add the amount that was given in line 1 by 2015 . then to find the percentage difference one will subtract 2014 by 2016 and then divide that solution by 2014 . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash equivalents and marketable securities 2016: $1100.6 Cash equivalents and marketable securities 2015: $1509.7 Decrease due to exchange rate changes in 2015: $156.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1509.7 to 156.1 which gives add(1509.7, 156.1) step 2: subtract 1100.6 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6) step 3: add 1509.7 to 156.1 which gives add(1509.7, 156.1) step 4: divide the expression of step 2 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6), add(1509.7, 156.1)), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6), add(1509.7, 156.1)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the contract terms of 15 years , what will be the total expense with the depreciation of the merchant gases segment?\\n Context: the merchant gases of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 32 ; the merchant gases of increase life by 1 year is $ -24 ( 24 ) ; we have numerous long-term customer supply contracts , particularly in the gases on-site business within the tonnage gases segment . these contracts principally have initial contract terms of 15 to 20 years . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of years of the contract multiplied by the increased life by year . The required values from the context for the question are: Merchant gases decrease life by 1 year: $32 Merchant gases increase life by 1 year: $-24 Contract terms mentioned: 15 to 20 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 24 by 15 which gives multiply(24, 15), The final logic expression is multiply(24, 15). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the mainline operations full-time equivalent employees to the total number of full-time equivalent employees Context: the total of mainline operations is 98900 ; the total of wholly-owned regional carriers is 19600 ; the total of total is 118500 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is amount in question divided by the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: Mainline operations employees: 98900 Total full-time equivalent employees: 118500 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 98900 by 118500 which gives divide(98900, 118500) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(98900, 118500), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(98900, 118500), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth in allowance for other funds used during construction from 2013 to 2014 Context: the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2015 is $ 13 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2014 is $ 9 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2013 is $ 13 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the division of the change by the begin balance The required values from the context for the question are: Allowance for other funds used during construction 2015: $13 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2014: $9 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2013: $13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 13 from const_9 which gives subtract(const_9, 13) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_9 which gives divide(subtract(const_9, 13), const_9) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(const_9, 13), const_9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(const_9, 13), const_9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the fair market value of plan assets of the benefit pension plans during 2014 and 2015? Context: the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2015 measurement date decreased to $ 3916.4 from $ 4114.6 at the end of fiscal year 2014 . ### Output: Logic: it is the final 2015 value subtracted by the initial 2014 value then divided by the initial value and turned into a percentage.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Fair market value of plan assets at the end of fiscal year 2015: $3916.4 Fair market value of plan assets at the end of fiscal year 2014: $4114.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4114.6 from 3916.4 which gives subtract(3916.4, 4114.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 4114.6 which gives divide(subtract(3916.4, 4114.6), 4114.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(3916.4, 4114.6), 4114.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(3916.4, 4114.6), 4114.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the combined amount of allowance for funds used in and funds borrowed in construction in 2016 Context: the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2017 is $ 19 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2016 is $ 15 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2015 is $ 13 ; ### Output: Logic: the combined amount of allowance of funds used and borrowed in any years is the sum of the separate amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Allowance for other funds used during construction 2017: $19 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2016: $15 Allowance for other funds used during construction 2015: $13 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 15 to const_6 which gives add(15, const_6), The final logic expression is add(15, const_6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the other commercial membership , what is the percentage of fully insured plans among the total commercial medical plans? Context: the fully insured of consumer-choice membership is 184000 ; the fully insured of other commercial membership is 1815800 ; the fully insured of commercial medical membership is 1999800 ; the total commercial medical of consumer-choice membership is 371100 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2799700 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3170800 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of members of the fully insured plans divided by the members of the total commercial medical plans . The required values from the context for the question are: fully insured of other commercial membership: 1815800 total commercial medical of other commercial membership: 2799700 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1815800 by 2799700 which gives divide(1815800, 2799700) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1815800, 2799700), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1815800, 2799700), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of structures and machinery/equipment in the global rolled products segment , in years? Context: the global rolled products of structures is 31 ; the global rolled products of machinery and equipment is 21 ; the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of years . The required values from the context for the question are: global rolled products of structures: 31 global rolled products of machinery and equipment: 21 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21 from 31 which gives subtract(31, 21), The final logic expression is subtract(31, 21). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase in expense related to office , warehouse space , and real estate during 2003 and 2004? Context: commitments and contingencies rental expense related to office , warehouse space and real estate amounted to $ 608 , $ 324 , and $ 281 for the years ended december 25 , 2004 , december 27 , 2003 , and december 28 , 2002 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those two values . The required values from the context for the question are: rental expense for 2003: 324 rental expense for 2004: 608 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 324 from 608 which gives subtract(608, 324), The final logic expression is subtract(608, 324). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average operating income? Context: years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2011 is 448 ; the operating income of 2010 is 234 ; the operating income of 2009 is 203 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all operating income divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: operating income of 2011: 448 operating income of 2010: 234 operating income of 2009: 203 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(operating income, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: taking the year 2015 , what is the increase to allowance as a percent of the balance at the end of the year? Context: december 31 , the increase to allowance of 2015 is 472 ; the increase to allowance of 2014 is 117 ; the increase to allowance of 2013 is 471 ; december 31 , the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 2037 ; the balance at end of year of 2014 is $ 1668 ; the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 1804 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the increase to allowance divided by the total balance at the end of the year . The required values from the context for the question are: increase to allowance of 2015: 472 balance at end of year of 2015: 2037 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 472 by 2037 which gives divide(472, 2037) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(472, 2037), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(472, 2037), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2022-2026 period , what is the annual projected benefit payment value? Context: 2017 the 2022 20132026 of $ 11.5 is 35.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all these years' projected benefit payments divided by five ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2022-2026 projected benefit payment: 11.5 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 35.3 by const_5 which gives divide(35.3, const_5), The final logic expression is divide(35.3, const_5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the changes in eog's total proved undeveloped reserves during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , what is the average value of extensions and discoveries? Context: the extensions and discoveries of 2018 is 490725 ; the extensions and discoveries of 2017 is 237378 ; the extensions and discoveries of 2016 is 138101 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all extensions and discoveries' value divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: extensions and discoveries of 2018: 490725 extensions and discoveries of 2017: 237378 extensions and discoveries of 2016: 138101 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(extensions and discoveries, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the liabilities incurred during 2017 and 2018? Context: the liabilities incurred of 2018 is 79057 ; the liabilities incurred of 2017 is 54764 ; the liabilities settled ( 1 ) of 2018 is -70829 ( 70829 ) ; the liabilities settled ( 1 ) of 2017 is -61871 ( 61871 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the liabilities incurred in 2018 divided by the 2017's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: liabilities incurred of 2018: 79057 liabilities incurred of 2017: 54764 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 79057 by 54764 which gives divide(79057, 54764) step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(79057, 54764), 1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(79057, 54764), 1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(79057, 54764), 1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2013 what was the percent of the net cash used for investing activities to the net cash provided by operating activities Context: ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 20776 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 18884 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 20963 ; ( in millions ) the net cash used for investing activities of 2013 is -18073 ( 18073 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2012 is -14060 ( 14060 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2011 is -10301 ( 10301 ) ; ### Output: Logic: in 2013 86.9% of the net cash provided by operating activities was used for investing activities The required values from the context for the question are: net cash provided by operating activities of 2013: 20776 net cash used for investing activities of 2013: 18073 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 18073 by 20776 which gives divide(18073, 20776) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(18073, 20776), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(18073, 20776), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the decline in the asset impairment loss for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 Context: the unaudited pro forma information presented has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations . certain of the legacy republic assets classified as held for sale were adjusted to their estimated fair values less costs to sell and resulted in the recognition of an asset impairment loss of $ 1.8 million and $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change in amount from 2008 to 2009 divide by 2008 The required values from the context for the question are: asset impairment loss of 2009: 1.8 asset impairment loss of 2008: 6.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6.1 from 1.8 which gives subtract(1.8, 6.1) step 2: subtract 6.1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(1.8, 6.1), 6.1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(1.8, 6.1), 6.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(1.8, 6.1), 6.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the growth in the stock total return performance for hum from 2013 to 2014 Context: the hum of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 152 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 214 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 267 ; the hum of 12/31/2016 is $ 307 ; the hum of 12/31/2017 is $ 377 ; ### Output: Logic: the stock total return performance for hum increased by 41% from 2013 to 2014 The required values from the context for the question are: stock total return performance of hum for 2013: 152 stock total return performance of hum for 2014: 214 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 152 from 214 which gives subtract(214, 152) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(214, 152), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(214, 152), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the weighted average grant date fair value , whats is the difference between how many actual shares vested during the year of 2010 and how many vested based on the average grant fair value? Context: the vested of number of shares is -34630 ( 34630 ) ; the vested of weighted average grant date fair value is 257 ; the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: its the total fair value of restricted stocks that vested in 2010 divided by the average grant fair value and compared with the actual number of vested shares . The required values from the context for the question are: Vested number of shares: -34630 Vested weighted average grant date fair value: 257 Total fair value of restricted stock for 2010: $10.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10.3 by const_1000000 which gives multiply(10.3, const_1000000) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 257 which gives divide(multiply(10.3, const_1000000), 257) step 3: subtract 34630 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(multiply(10.3, const_1000000), 257), 34630), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(multiply(10.3, const_1000000), 257), 34630). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2009 and 2010 , what is the difference between the growth of the benefit payments and the expected subsidy receipts? Context: the 2009 of benefit payments is $ 2641 ; the 2009 of expected subsidy receipts is $ 77 ; the 2009 of net benefit payments is $ 2564 ; the 2010 of benefit payments is 3139 ; the 2010 of expected subsidy receipts is 91 ; the 2010 of net benefit payments is 3048 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between each percentual growth . The required values from the context for the question are: 2009 benefit payments: $2641 2009 expected subsidy receipts: $77 2010 benefit payments: $3139 2010 expected subsidy receipts: $91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 91 by 77 which gives divide(91, 77) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1) step 3: divide 3139 by 2641 which gives divide(3139, 2641) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1), subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1), subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(3139, 2641), const_1), subtract(divide(91, 77), const_1)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the increase observed in the liability for interest? Context: as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of 2009 divide by the 2008's , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Liability for interest 2009: $18 million Liability for interest 2008: $14 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 18 by 14 which gives divide(18, 14) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(18, 14), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(18, 14), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(18, 14), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average value of diluted earnings per share issuable under incentive stock plans? Context: in millions the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2018 is 0.7 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2017 is 0.9 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2016 is 1.1 ; the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all diluted earnings per shares issuable under incentive stock plans in these three years , then divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2018: 0.7 Shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2017: 0.9 Shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2016: 1.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(shares issuable under incentive stock plans, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the adjusted net income from discontinued operations during 2017 and 2018 , in millions? Context: ( 3 ) adjusted net income from discontinued operations excludes the gain on sale of discontinued operations of $ 82 million , $ 779 million , and $ 0 million for the years ended 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Gain on sale of discontinued operations 2018: $82 million Gain on sale of discontinued operations 2017: $779 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 82 from 779 which gives subtract(779, 82), The final logic expression is subtract(779, 82). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how big is south america compared to asia? Context: country the brazil of at december 31 2011 banks is 149 ; the brazil of at december 31 2011 governments is 3398 ; the brazil of at december 31 2011 other is 2165 ; the brazil of at december 31 2011 total is 5712 ; country the japan of at december 31 2011 banks is 23542 ; the japan of at december 31 2011 governments is 436 ; the japan of at december 31 2011 other is 2821 ; the japan of at december 31 2011 total is 26799 ; ### Output: Logic: brazil - south america , japan - asia The required values from the context for the question are: Brazil total 2011: 5712 Japan total 2011: 26799 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 5712 by 26799 which gives divide(5712, 26799) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(5712, 26799), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(5712, 26799), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change number of units in 2009 in thousands Context: the granted of number of units ( in thousands ) is 420 ; the granted of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 38.16 ; the vested of number of units ( in thousands ) is -79 ( 79 ) ; the vested of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 21.30 ; the forfeited of number of units ( in thousands ) is -114 ( 114 ) ; the forfeited of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 17.28 ; ### Output: Logic: the change is the summation of all activity both the increase and decrease The required values from the context for the question are: Granted number of units 2009: 420 Vested number of units 2009: -79 Forfeited number of units 2009: -114 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 420 to -79 which gives add(420, -79) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to -114 which gives add(add(420, -79), -114), The final logic expression is add(add(420, -79), -114). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: about how many towers were leased or subleased in 2004? Context: as of december 31 , 2004 , 8816 of the sites on which our u.s . towers are located , or approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our u.s . portfolio , were leased , subleased or licensed , while 1796 or approximately 17% ( 17 % ) were owned in fee or through . ### Output: Logic: the total number of towers in the us are given in line 24 . to find the amount leased we multiple that by the percentage given in line 25 . The required values from the context for the question are: Sites on U.S. towers as of December 31, 2004: 8816 Percentage of leased U.S. towers 2004: 83% Owned U.S. towers 2004: 1796 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 8816 by 83% which gives multiply(8816, 83%), The final logic expression is multiply(8816, 83%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016 and 2017 , what is the average current portion? Context: the current portion of 2017 is $ 19259 ; the current portion of 2016 is $ 18516 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of both current portion's value divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: Current portion 2017: $19259 Current portion 2016: $18516 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(current portion, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total amount of principle payment paid from 2008 to 2011? Context: the term loan calls for quarterly principal payments of $ 5 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2008 and increasing to $ 10 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2010 and $ 15 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2011 . ### Output: Logic: to find the total amount of payments one must check line 7 and added up all the years from 2008 to 2011 . The required values from the context for the question are: Quarterly principal payments starting August 31, 2008: $5 million Quarterly principal payments starting August 31, 2010: $10 million Quarterly principal payments starting August 31, 2011: $15 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10) step 2: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)), The final logic expression is add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the fair value of options granted in 2008 , what is going to be its estimated future value when the expected life ends? Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2008 is $ 18.47 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2007 is $ 33.81 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006 is $ 20.01 ; the dividend yield of 2008 is 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2007 is 0.76% ( 0.76 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2006 is 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ; the expected life of options in years of 2008 is 6.0 ; the expected life of options in years of 2007 is 6.0 ; the expected life of options in years of 2006 is 6.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the future value formula , in which $ 1847 is the present value , 3.75% is the interest rate and 6 years is the period . The required values from the context for the question are: Weighted average fair value of options granted 2008: $18.47 Dividend yield 2008: 3.75% Expected life of options 2008: 6.0 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 18.47 by exp(add(const_1, 3.75%), const_6) which gives multiply(18.47, exp(add(const_1, 3.75%), const_6)), The final logic expression is multiply(18.47, exp(add(const_1, 3.75%), const_6)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what are the average cost of accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2016 and 2017? Context: the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2017 is -29191247 ( 29191247 ) ; the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2016 is -26247062 ( 26247062 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for both years divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization 2017: -29191247 Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization 2016: -26247062 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2018 , how many approximate shares would have been held for the entire year to pay the approximate $ 320 in dividends over the 12 months? Context: on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) had declared a common stock cash dividend of $ 0.21 per share , payable on march 15 , 2018 to holders of record as of the close of business on march 1 , 2018 . assuming we pay a quarterly dividend of $ 0.21 per share and there is no significant change in the number of outstanding shares as of december 31 , 2017 , we would expect to pay approximately $ 320.0 over the next twelve months. . ### Output: Logic: quarterly payments = 4 payments per year The required values from the context for the question are: Dividend per share declared on February 14, 2018: $0.21 Total expected dividend payment over 12 months: $320.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 0.21 by const_4 which gives multiply(0.21, const_4) step 2: divide 320 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(320, multiply(0.21, const_4)), The final logic expression is divide(320, multiply(0.21, const_4)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much is the goodwill worth in 2016 if the intangible assets are worth $ 31.1 million? Context: the goodwill acquired as part of acquisition of 2017 is 2014 ; the goodwill acquired as part of acquisition of 2016 is 84159 ; note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 . ### Output: Logic: in the first line , it says that the goodwill and intangibles assets for 2016 was $ 94.4 million this means that if the intangible assets was $ 31.3 million . therefore , the goodwill will be 63.1 million The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill 2016: $94.4 million Intangible assets 2016: $31.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 31.3 from 94.4 which gives subtract(94.4, 31.3), The final logic expression is subtract(94.4, 31.3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percentage has long-term debt gone down from 2004 to 2008? Context: 2004 the 2008 of $ 244.5 is $ 0.9 ; notes to consolidated financial statements ( dollars in millions , except per share amounts ) long-term debt maturing over the next five years and thereafter is as follows: . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage decrease you need to subtract 2004 by 2008 to get 243.6 million . then you take this and divide by 2004 which will give you 99.6% The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt in 2008: $0.9 million Long-term debt in 2004: $244.5 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 0.9 from 244.5 which gives subtract(244.5, 0.9) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 244.5 which gives divide(subtract(244.5, 0.9), 244.5) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(244.5, 0.9), 244.5), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(244.5, 0.9), 244.5), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the remaining purchase capacity of the october 2015 compared to the authorized Context: 12 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . as of december 31 , 2015 , the october 2015 repurchase program had remaining authorized purchase capacity of $ 855.5 million . in october 2015 , our board of directors added $ 900.0 million to the existing share repurchase authorization , which now extends through december 31 , 2017 . ### Output: Logic: the percent of the remainder to the authorized , you divide the remainder by the authorized The required values from the context for the question are: Remaining authorized purchase capacity as of December 31, 2015: $855.5 million Added amount to share repurchase authorization in October 2015: $900.0 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 855.5 by 900.0 which gives divide(855.5, 900.0) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(855.5, 900.0), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(855.5, 900.0), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: if the company were to buy the remaining securities at the average price of $ 34.92 , what would be the total payments from the company? Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) is 1765510 ; the total of weighted-average exerciseprice of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b ) is $ 34.92 ; the total of number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 7927210 ; the total of is -1 ( 1 ) ; plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders : 1765510 $ 34.92 7927210 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders : 2014 2014 2014 . ### Output: Logic: the payment of the remaining securities can be found by multiplying the number of remaining securities at the average price they are bought . The required values from the context for the question are: Number of securities remaining available for future issuance: 7927210 Average price: $34.92 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 7927210 by 34.92 which gives multiply(7927210, 34.92), The final logic expression is multiply(7927210, 34.92). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the weighted average fair value of options , how many shares vested in 2004? Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2006 is $ 20.01 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2005 is $ 9.48 ; the weighted average fair value of options granted of 2004 is $ 7.28 ; the total fair value of shares vested during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 was $ 9413 , $ 8249 , and $ 6418 respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the total fair value of options that vested in 2004 divided by its weighted average fair value also in 2004 . The required values from the context for the question are: Weighted average fair value of options granted in 2004: $7.28 Total fair value of shares vested in 2004: $6418 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 6418 by 7.28 which gives divide(6418, 7.28), The final logic expression is divide(6418, 7.28). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total equity compensation plans approved by security holders Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 3946111 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 34.67 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 3608527 ; ### Output: Logic: the total is the sum of all securities for the plan The required values from the context for the question are: Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights: 3946111 Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans: 3608527 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 3946111 to 3608527 which gives add(3946111, 3608527), The final logic expression is add(3946111, 3608527). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: by how much was the net cash from fiscal year ending in june 2007 below the three year average of net cash from operating activities? Context: 2007 the net cash from operating activities of year ended june 30 2008 2007 is $ 181001 ; the net cash from operating activities of year ended june 30 2008 2007 is $ 174247 ; the net cash from operating activities of year ended june 30 2008 is $ 169438 ; the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : year ended june 30 cash provided by operations increased $ 6754 to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 as compared to $ 174247 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2007 . ### Output: Logic: calculate the average by adding all the years' net cash and divide by 3 , then subtract the 2007 total from that number . The required values from the context for the question are: Net cash from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2008: $181001 Net cash from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2007: $174247 Net cash from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2008 (again?): $169438 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 181001 to 174247 which gives add(181001, 174247) step 2: add 169438 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(169438, add(181001, 174247)) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(169438, add(181001, 174247)), const_3) step 4: subtract 174247 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(add(169438, add(181001, 174247)), const_3), 174247), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(add(169438, add(181001, 174247)), const_3), 174247). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average consolidated rental expense from 2006 to 2008 Context: consolidated rental expense for the company 2019s office space , which is recognized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease , was approximately $ 42905 , $ 35614 and $ 31467 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the average consolidated rental expense from 2006 to 2008 was 36662 The required values from the context for the question are: Consolidated rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2008: $42905 Consolidated rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2007: $35614 Consolidated rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2006: $31467 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 42905 to 35614 which gives add(42905, 35614) step 2: add 31467 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(31467, add(42905, 35614)) step 3: add the expression of step 2 to const_3 which gives add(add(31467, add(42905, 35614)), const_3) step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_2 which gives divide(add(add(31467, add(42905, 35614)), const_3), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(31467, add(42905, 35614)), const_3), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change in tax positions in 2010 Context: balance at january 1 2010 the increases in current period tax positions of $ 25621 is 907 ; balance at january 1 2010 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 25621 is -2740 ( 2740 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net tax position is the sum of the increase and the decrease to determine whether the overall change was favorable or not The required values from the context for the question are: Increases in current period tax positions for January 1, 2010: $907 Decreases in current period tax positions for January 1, 2010: -$2740 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 907 to -2740 which gives add(907, -2740), The final logic expression is add(907, -2740). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of outstanding shares among all issued shares? Context: as of 30 september 2016 , 249 million shares were issued , with 217 million outstanding . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of outstanding shares divided by the number of shares issued in total , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Issued shares as of 30 September 2016: 249 million Outstanding shares as of 30 September 2016: 217 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 217 by 249 which gives divide(217, 249) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(217, 249), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(217, 249), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated average return for the s&p financial index and the s&p 500 index in the firs year of the investment of $ 100? Context: december 31 ( in dollars ) the s&p financial index of 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p financial index of 2014 is 115.18 ; the s&p financial index of 2015 is 113.38 ; the s&p financial index of 2016 is 139.17 ; the s&p financial index of 2017 is 169.98 ; the s&p financial index of 2018 is 147.82 ; december 31 ( in dollars ) the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 113.68 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 115.24 ; the s&p 500 index of 2016 is 129.02 ; the s&p 500 index of 2017 is 157.17 ; the s&p 500 index of 2018 is 150.27 ; the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . ### Output: Logic: its the average of the percentual return provided by each indice during the years 2013 and 2014 . The required values from the context for the question are: S&P Financial Index in 2013: 100.00 S&P Financial Index in 2014: 115.18 S&P 500 Index in 2013: 100.00 S&P 500 Index in 2014: 113.68 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 115.18 by 100 which gives divide(115.18, 100) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1) step 3: divide 113.68 by 100 which gives divide(113.68, 100) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1) step 5: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)) step 6: divide the expression of step 5 by const_2 which gives divide(add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)), const_2) step 7: multiply the expression of step 6 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)), const_2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(subtract(divide(115.18, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(113.68, 100), const_1)), const_2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the ratio of perfomance shares as a percent of the total number of granted shares? Context: the outstanding at december 31 2016 of number of shares is 1820578 ; the outstanding at december 31 2016 of weightedaveragegrant datefair value is $ 98 ; in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the granted of number of shares is 650942 ; the granted of weightedaveragegrant datefair value is 129 ; ### Output: Logic: its the division of the number of perfomance shares ( 203298 ) by the total number of granted shares ( 650942 ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Number of performance shares: 203298 Total number of granted shares: 650942 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 203298 by 650942 which gives divide(203298, 650942) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(203298, 650942), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(203298, 650942), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the ratio between the value of vehicles and buildings and improvements? Context: buildings and improvements the vehicles of 39 is 5 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the vehicles divided by the value of the buildings and improvements . The required values from the context for the question are: Value of vehicles: 5 Value of buildings and improvements: 39 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 5 by 39 which gives divide(5, 39), The final logic expression is divide(5, 39). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average expected dividend yield during 2008-2010? Context: the expected dividend yield of 2010 is 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) ; the expected dividend yield of 2009 is 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) ; the expected dividend yield of 2008 is 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all expected dividends yield divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected dividend yield of 2010: 0.3% Expected dividend yield of 2009: 0.4% Expected dividend yield of 2008: 0.3% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_average(expected dividend yield, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(expected dividend yield, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(expected dividend yield, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what would the purchase obligations and other be for payments before the period be if they included the multiemployer pension plan? Context: ( in millions ) the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period total is 2210.5 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2019 is 1676.6 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2020and 2021 is 224.1 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2022and 2023 is 114.9 ; the purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) of payments due by period thereafter is 194.9 ; ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 247.8 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2018 due to lack of definite payout terms for certain of the obligations . ### Output: Logic: in line 19 , it says that they did not include the pension plan . to find out what the cost would be if they included the pension plan one needs to add 247.8 ( given in line 19 ) and 2210.5 ( given in the table ) which will give you $ 2458.3 million The required values from the context for the question are: Purchase obligations and other (total): 2210.5 Excluded multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities: $247.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 247.8 to 2210.5 which gives add(247.8, 2210.5), The final logic expression is add(247.8, 2210.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2006 , what is the percentual fluctuation of the return provided by s&p 500 and the one provided by old peer group? Context: the s&p 500 of 2006 is 115.80 ; the s&p 500 of 2007 is 122.16 ; the s&p 500 of 2008 is 76.96 ; the s&p 500 of 2009 is 97.33 ; the s&p 500 of 2010 is 111.99 ; the old peer group of 2006 is 155.58 ; the old peer group of 2007 is 190.78 ; the old peer group of 2008 is 72.25 ; the old peer group of 2009 is 76.11 ; the old peer group of 2010 is 87.61 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the return's percentage of both s&p 500 ( 15.8% ) and old peer group ( 55.58% ) The required values from the context for the question are: S&P 500 return in 2006: 115.80 Old peer group return in 2006: 155.58 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 115.80 which gives subtract(115.80, 100) step 2: subtract 100 from 155.58 which gives subtract(155.58, 100) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2013 , what was the percentual increase in the actual return on assets compared with the expected return? Context: for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the actual return divided by the expected return , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Actual return on assets in fiscal 2013: $74 million Expected return on assets in fiscal 2013: $64 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 74 by 64 which gives divide(74, 64) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(74, 64), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(74, 64), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(74, 64), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what are the percentage of the acquisition of westgate mall , shaw 2019s plaza , and several parcels of land in the investing activities?\\n Context: we used cash of $ 154.3 million during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2004 in investing activities , including the following : 2022 $ 101.7 million for our acquisition of westgate mall , shaw 2019s plaza and several parcels of land , 2022 capital expenditures of $ 59.2 million for development and redevelopment of properties including santana row , 2022 maintenance capital expenditures of approximately $ 36.9 million , 2022 $ 9.4 million capital contribution to a real estate partnership , and 2022 an additional $ 3.2 million net advance under an existing mortgage note receivable ; offset by 2022 $ 41.8 million in net sale proceeds from the sale of properties , and . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of that acquisition divided by the total investing activities value , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash used during the twelve months ended December 31, 2004: $154.3 million Acquisition of Westgate Mall, Shaw 2019s Plaza and several parcels of land: $101.7 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 101.7 by 154.3 which gives divide(101.7, 154.3) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(101.7, 154.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(101.7, 154.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the high trading stock prices in the first and second quarters in 2015? Context: quarter the first of 2015 high is $ 17.10 ; the first of 2015 low is $ 12.65 ; the first of 2015 dividend is $ 0.03 ; the first of 2015 high is $ 12.97 ; the first of 2015 low is $ 9.82 ; the first of dividend is $ 0.03 ; quarter the second of 2015 high is 14.29 ; the second of 2015 low is 11.15 ; the second of 2015 dividend is 0.03 ; the second of 2015 high is 15.18 ; the second of 2015 low is 12.34 ; the second of dividend is 0.03 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those two prices . The required values from the context for the question are: First quarter 2015 high trading stock price: $17.10 Second quarter 2015 high trading stock price: 14.29 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 14.29 from 17.10 which gives subtract(17.10, 14.29), The final logic expression is subtract(17.10, 14.29). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual decline of the deductions during 2007 and 2008? Context: balance december 31 2006 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 740507 is -80258 ( 80258 ) ; balance december 31 2006 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 740507 is -11766 ( 11766 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual variation of the value of the deduction , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value of the final value , then dividing by the initial value and turning it into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Deductions during period 2014 (from balance December 31, 2006): $740507 Disposition and retirements of property 2014 (from balance December 31, 2006): -80258 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 80258 from 11766 which gives subtract(11766, 80258) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 80258 which gives divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the ventas stock as of 12/31/2003 Context: the ventas of 12/31/2002 is $ 100 ; the ventas of 12/31/2003 is $ 206 ; the ventas of 12/31/2004 is $ 270 ; the ventas of 12/31/2005 is $ 331 ; the ventas of 12/31/2006 is $ 457 ; the ventas of 12/31/2007 is $ 512 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from year to year divided by the original year amount The required values from the context for the question are: Ventas stock value as of 12/31/2002: $100 Ventas stock value as of 12/31/2003: $206 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 206 which gives subtract(206, const_100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(206, const_100), const_100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(206, const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(206, const_100), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage that net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased from 2008 to 2009? Context: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . ### Output: Logic: to find the answer one must subtract the totals of the two years and then take that answer and divide it by the total for 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: Increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from 2008 to 2009: $28.9 million Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in fiscal 2008: $8.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 8.1 from 28.9 which gives subtract(28.9, 8.1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 8.1 which gives divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(28.9, 8.1), 8.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the fluctuation between the lowest and average operating margin? Context: years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the operating margin of 2014 is 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the average and the minimum value . The required values from the context for the question are: operating margin of 2014: 21.0% operating margin of 2013: 19.8% operating margin of 2012: 19.6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract table_min(operating margin, none) from table_average(operating margin, none) which gives subtract(table_average(operating margin, none), table_min(operating margin, none)) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(table_average(operating margin, none), table_min(operating margin, none)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(table_average(operating margin, none), table_min(operating margin, none)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of buildings are owned in the united states by the company? Context: ( square feet in thousands ) the owned of united states is 4530 ; the owned of other countries is 2417 ; the owned of total is 6947 ; ( square feet in thousands ) the leased of united states is 1037 ; the leased of other countries is 1341 ; the leased of total is 2378 ; ( square feet in thousands ) the total of united states is 5567 ; the total of other countries is 3758 ; the total of total is 9325 ; because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of buildings owned by the company in the u.s . one must divide the buildings owned in the u.s . by the total amount of buildings . The required values from the context for the question are: owned in the United States: 4530 square feet (thousands) total buildings in the United States: 5567 square feet (thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4530 by 5567 which gives divide(4530, 5567) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4530, 5567), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4530, 5567), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the expenses of the 2013 charge , what were the impact of the severance and other benefits on the total value? Context: the 2013 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 71.9 ; the 2013 charge of asset actions is $ 100.4 ; the 2013 charge of contract actions/other is $ 59.3 ; the 2013 charge of total is $ 231.6 ; 2013 plan during the fourth quarter of 2013 , we recorded an expense of $ 231.6 ( $ 157.9 after-tax , or $ .74 per share ) reflecting actions to better align our cost structure with current market conditions . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the severance and other benefits divided by the total expenses of the 2013 charge , then turned into a percentage to represent the impact . The required values from the context for the question are: 2013 charge of severance and other benefits: $71.9 million 2013 charge of total: $231.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 71.9 by 231.6 which gives divide(71.9, 231.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(71.9, 231.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(71.9, 231.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual growth of the depreciation and amortization expenses during 2008 and 2009? Context: balance december 31 2008 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 846258 is 103698 ; balance december 31 2008 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 846258 is 108261 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the depreciation and amortization expenses of 2009 divided by the 2009's then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: depreciation and amortization expense 2008: 103698 ($846258) depreciation and amortization expense 2009: 108261 ($846258) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 108261 by 103698 which gives divide(108261, 103698) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(108261, 103698), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(108261, 103698), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(108261, 103698), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the period month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) as part of the total of total number of shares ( or units ) purchased Context: period the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( a ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased is 1119600 ; the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( b ) average price paid per share ( or unit ) is $ 34.52 ; the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( c ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 1119600 ; the month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) of ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 285.3 ; period the total of ( a ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased is 3005500 ; the total of ( b ) average price paid per share ( or unit ) is $ 35.86 ; the total of ( c ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 3005500 ; the total of ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 216.2 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent of the period month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) as part of the total of total number of shares ( or units ) purchased was 37.3 of the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: month #1 (October 1, 2014 - October 31, 2005) total number of shares purchased: 1119600 total number of shares purchased: 3005500 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1119600 by 3005500 which gives divide(1119600, 3005500) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1119600, 3005500), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1119600, 3005500), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the global rolled products' atoi concerning the total atoi in 2016? Context: the atoi of 2016 is $ 269 ; the atoi of 2015 is $ 225 ; the atoi of 2014 is $ 224 ; atoi for all reportable segments totaled $ 1087 in 2016 , $ 986 in 2015 , and $ 983 in 2014 . global rolled products ( 1 ) . ### Output: Logic: it is the atoi for the global rolled products divided by the atoi of all segments , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: atoi 2016: $269 million total atoi for all segments 2016: $1087 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 269 by 1087 which gives divide(269, 1087) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(269, 1087), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(269, 1087), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2009 , what is the difference between the carrying value on consolidated balance sheets for derivative receivables and derivative payables , in millions? Context: december 31 2009 ( in millions ) the carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative receivables is $ 80210 ; the carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative payables is $ 60125 ; ### Output: Logic: its the variation between each carrying value on consolidated balance sheets . The required values from the context for the question are: carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative receivables 2009: $80210 million carrying value on consolidated balance sheets of derivative payables 2009: $60125 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 60125 from 80210 which gives subtract(80210, 60125), The final logic expression is subtract(80210, 60125). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: using the value of the undivided interest held by investors and retained by upri at december 31 , 2009 as a proxy for ar balance , what was the average receivable turnover in 2009?\\n\\n[14] : at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . Context: the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: total amount collected during 2009 divided by year end balance = turnover The required values from the context for the question are: Value of undivided interest held by investors at December 31, 2009: $817 million Value of undivided interest held by investors at December 31, 2008: $1015 million Interest retained by UPRI at December 31, 2009: $417 million Interest retained by UPRI at December 31, 2008: $431 million Amount collected during 2009: $13.8 billion Amount collected during 2008: $17.8 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 13.8 by const_1000 which gives multiply(13.8, const_1000) step 2: add 417 to 817 which gives add(417, 817) step 3: divide the expression of step 1 by the expression of step 2 which gives divide(multiply(13.8, const_1000), add(417, 817)), The final logic expression is divide(multiply(13.8, const_1000), add(417, 817)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: did consolidated net sales grow from 2007 to 2009 , and what was the growth , in a percentage , from 2007 to 2009? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 is $ 7963 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 10086 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 20142008 is ( 21 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2008 20142007 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 36% ( 36 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 33% ( 33 % ) in 2008 and 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 . ### Output: Logic: in order to find out consolidated net sales , one must multiple the segmented net sales by the percentage given in line 4 . these numbers are subtracted by each other and the solution is divided by the lowest number . the final answer is then 6% The required values from the context for the question are: Segment net sales, 2009: $7963 million Segment net sales, 2008: $10086 million Segment net sales, 2007: $10014 million Segment's share of consolidated net sales, 2009: 36% Segment's share of consolidated net sales, 2008: 33% Segment's share of consolidated net sales, 2007: 27% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10014 by 27% which gives multiply(10014, 27%) step 2: multiply 7963 by 36% which gives multiply(7963, 36%) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(7963, 36%), multiply(10014, 27%)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(7963, 36%), multiply(10014, 27%)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(7963, 36%), multiply(10014, 27%)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage growth in the total re-organization costs from 2012 to 2013 Context: the total reorganization items net of 2013 is $ 2640 ; the total reorganization items net of 2012 is $ 2179 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the most recent amount less the prior amount divided by the prior amount multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: Total reorganization items net, 2013: $2640 million Total reorganization items net, 2012: $2179 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2179 from 2640 which gives subtract(2640, 2179) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2179 which gives divide(subtract(2640, 2179), 2179) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2640, 2179), 2179), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2640, 2179), 2179), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2017 , what is the lowest projected benefit payment value? Context: the 2017 of u.s . is $ 150.3 ; the 2017 of international is $ 45.7 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value of the projected benefit payment observed in that year . The required values from the context for the question are: U.S., 2017: $150.3 million International, 2017: $45.7 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(2017, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average number of aso memberships? Context: the aso of smart plans and other consumer membership is 277500 ; the aso of other commercial membership is 1364500 ; the aso of commercial medical membership is 1642000 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of both types of memberships , then divided by two to represent the average . The required values from the context for the question are: ASO of smart plans and other consumer membership: 277500 ASO of other commercial membership: 1364500 ASO of commercial medical membership: 1642000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 277500 to 1364500 which gives add(277500, 1364500) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(277500, 1364500), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(277500, 1364500), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total number of shares subject to outstanding awards from both 2004 and 2009 Context: the 2004 stock incentive plan of shares available for awards is - ; the 2004 stock incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards is 5923147 ; the 2009 global incentive plan of shares available for awards is 2322450 ; the 2009 global incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards is 2530454 ; ### Output: Logic: the total number is the sum of all the amounts The required values from the context for the question are: 2004 stock incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards: 5923147 2009 global incentive plan of shares subject to outstanding awards: 2530454 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 5923147 to 2530454 which gives add(5923147, 2530454), The final logic expression is add(5923147, 2530454). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the amount of money represented by all the class b derivatives , in millions of dollars? Context: rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 12536 ; the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 32 ; the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of exposure net of all collateral is 13925 ; the bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 34 ; rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 6373 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; ### Output: Logic: its the sum of the all the class b derivative receivables in 2018 . The required values from the context for the question are: BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 rating equivalent exposure net, 2018: 12536 million BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 exposure net, 2018: 13925 million BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 rating equivalent exposure net, 2018: 6373 million BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 exposure net, 2018: 7397 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 13925 to 7397 which gives add(13925, 7397), The final logic expression is add(13925, 7397). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the increase observed in the research and development expenditures? Context: our research and development ( ""r&d"" ) expenditures were approximately $ 48.3 million , $ 47.3 million and $ 45.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the expenditures in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: R&D expenditures, 2017: $48.3 million R&D expenditures, 2016: $47.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 48.3 by 47.3 which gives divide(48.3, 47.3) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(48.3, 47.3), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(48.3, 47.3), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(48.3, 47.3), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the expected benefit payments during 2012 and 2013? Context: 2010 the 2012 of $ 18181 is 21548 ; 2010 the 2013 of $ 18181 is 25513 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the expected benefit payment's value in 2013 divided by the 2012's , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected benefit payments, 2012: $21548 (relative to base $18181) Expected benefit payments, 2013: $25513 (relative to base $18181) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 25513 by 21548 which gives divide(25513, 21548) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(25513, 21548), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(25513, 21548), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(25513, 21548), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the change in the free cash flow from 2008 to 2009 in millions Context: the free cash flow of 2009 is $ 602.0 ; the free cash flow of 2008 is $ 133.5 ; the free cash flow of 2007 is $ 374.9 ; ### Output: Logic: the change is the difference between the two amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Free cash flow, 2009: $602.0 million Free cash flow, 2008: $133.5 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 133.5 from 602.0 which gives subtract(602.0, 133.5), The final logic expression is subtract(602.0, 133.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2007-2008 , what was the increase observed in the expense related to all of the defined contribution plans? Context: the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 35341 , $ 26996 and $ 43594 for 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the expense related to all of the defined contribution plans in 2008 divided by the 2007's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2008: $43594 2007: $26996 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 35341 by 26996 which gives divide(35341, 26996) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(35341, 26996), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(35341, 26996), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(35341, 26996), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the average interest expense? Context: the interest expense of 2017 is $ 120.6 ; the interest expense of 2016 is $ 115.2 ; the interest expense of 2015 is $ 102.8 ; interest expense . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all interest expenses divided by three ( the sum of the years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2015: $102.8 2016: $115.2 2017: $120.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(interest expense, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2014 what was the income from continuing operations adjusted for diluting operations? Context: the income from continuing operations of 2014 is $ 2.39 ; the income from continuing operations of 2013 is $ 2.07 ; the income from continuing operations of 2012 is $ 2.10 ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2014 is $ -0.04 ( 0.04 ) ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2013 is $ -0.01 ( 0.01 ) ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2012 is $ -0.09 ( 0.09 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the income from continuing operations in 2014 was given as 2.39 while the dilute operations included from continuing operations was 0.04 thus the adjusted income less dilute operations was 2.35 The required values from the context for the question are: 2014 income from continuing operations: $2.39 2014 income (loss) from discontinued operations net of tax: -$0.04 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 0.04 from 2.39 which gives subtract(2.39, 0.04), The final logic expression is subtract(2.39, 0.04). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the combined change to the tax liabilities both current and long-term following the sfas 158 adoption adjustments Context: the deferred taxes ( current ) of prior to application of sfas 158 is $ 191 ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of sfas 158 adoption adjustments is $ -28 ( 28 ) ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of after application of sfas 158 is $ 163 ; the deferred taxes ( long-term ) of prior to application of sfas 158 is $ 186 ; the deferred taxes ( long-term ) of sfas 158 adoption adjustments is $ 227 ; the deferred taxes ( long-term ) of after application of sfas 158 is $ 413 ; ### Output: Logic: the combined amount in tax liability adjustment is the some of the current amount and the long term amount The required values from the context for the question are: Current deferred taxes before SFAS 158: $191 Current deferred taxes SFAS 158 adjustments: -$28 Long-term deferred taxes before SFAS 158: $186 Long-term deferred taxes SFAS 158 adjustments: $227 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 28 by const_m1 which gives multiply(28, const_m1) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 227 which gives add(multiply(28, const_m1), 227), The final logic expression is add(multiply(28, const_m1), 227). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average weighted-average useful life for all those intangible assets , in number of years? Context: customer relationships the trademarks of 25 is 25 ; the trademarks of years is years ; customer relationships the completed technology/patents of 25 is 10 ; the completed technology/patents of years is years ; customer relationships the other of 25 is 25 ; the other of years is years ; intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all weighted-average useful lives divided by four ( number of intangible assets ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Customer relationships: 25 years Completed technology/patents: 10 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 25 to 25 which gives add(25, 25) step 2: add 25 to 10 which gives add(25, 10) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(25, 25), add(25, 10)) step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by const_4 which gives divide(add(add(25, 25), add(25, 10)), const_4), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(25, 25), add(25, 10)), const_4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 312008 what was the percent of the unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions allied had taken prior to the merger . Context: as of december 31 , 2008 , $ 582.9 million of the $ 611.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions allied had taken prior to the merger . ### Output: Logic: in this case the percent is the amount divide by the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2008 The required values from the context for the question are: December 31, 2008 unrecognized tax benefits: $582.9 million Total unrecognized tax benefits 2008: $611.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 582.9 by 611.9 which gives divide(582.9, 611.9) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(582.9, 611.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(582.9, 611.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average space of the warehouse in square feet Context: the warehouses of approximate number is 16 ; the warehouses of approximate size in square feet is 500000 ; ### Output: Logic: the average space of a warehouse was 31250 The required values from the context for the question are: Number of warehouses: 16 Total square feet: 500000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 500000 by 16 which gives divide(500000, 16), The final logic expression is divide(500000, 16). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2005-2007 , what is the average fair value of shares vested , in millions? Context: the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: 2005 vested shares fair value: $0.6 million 2006 vested shares fair value: $2.3 million 2007 vested shares fair value: $3.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 3.4 to 0.6 which gives add(3.4, 0.6) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 2.3 which gives add(add(3.4, 0.6), 2.3) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(3.4, 0.6), 2.3), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(3.4, 0.6), 2.3), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of assets for the acquisition of paypros was deductible for taxes? Context: goodwill the customer-related intangible assets of $ 271577 is 147500 ; goodwill the contract-based intangible assets of $ 271577 is 31000 ; goodwill the acquired technology of $ 271577 is 10700 ; goodwill the fixed assets of $ 271577 is 1680 ; goodwill the other assets of $ 271577 is 4230 ; goodwill the total assets acquired of $ 271577 is 466687 ; the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of assets that are tax deductible one will nee to added all the intangible assets and technology acquisitions . then they will divide that answer by the total amount of assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Customer-related intangible assets: $147500 Contract-based intangible assets: $31000 Acquired technology: $10700 Total assets acquired: $466687 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 10700 to 31000 which gives add(10700, 31000) step 2: add 147500 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(147500, add(10700, 31000)) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 466687 which gives divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in millions , what was the average loss from foreign currency translation from 2015-2017? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign currency translation of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ -96.1 ( 96.1 ) ; the foreign currency translation of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ -139.6 ( 139.6 ) ; the foreign currency translation of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ -61.1 ( 61.1 ) ; the company classifies deferred financing costs as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the long-term debt liability on the consolidated balance sheets , except for deferred financing costs associated with revolving credit facilities which are presented as an asset , within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . accumulated other comprehensive loss the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders 2019 equity are as follows: . ### Output: Logic: add all losses from foreign transactions and divide by the total number of years to get the average . The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 foreign currency translation loss: -$61.1 million 2016 foreign currency translation loss: -$139.6 million 2017 foreign currency translation loss: -$96.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 96.1 to 139.6 which gives add(96.1, 139.6) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 61.1 which gives add(add(96.1, 139.6), 61.1) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(96.1, 139.6), 61.1), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(96.1, 139.6), 61.1), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what were the total net earnings year ended december 31 2013 in millions Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 1st qtr is 44 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 2nd qtr is 57 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 3rd qtr is 69 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 4th qtr is 91 ; ### Output: Logic: the total net earnings for the year is the sum of the quarterly earnings The required values from the context for the question are: 2013 1st qtr net earnings: $44 million 2013 2nd qtr net earnings: $57 million 2013 3rd qtr net earnings: $69 million 2013 4th qtr net earnings: $91 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 44 to 57 which gives add(44, 57) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 69 which gives add(add(44, 57), 69), The final logic expression is add(add(44, 57), 69). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total authorized the aggregate repurchase of common stock since february 2008 including the additional amount authorized in 2017 in billions Context: ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 . ### Output: Logic: the total amount is the sum of the amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Aggregate repurchase since February 2008: $3.9 billion Increase authorized on July 17, 2017: $1.5 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 3.9 to 1.5 which gives add(3.9, 1.5), The final logic expression is add(3.9, 1.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31 , 2009 what was the remaining percentage outstanding of the $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock as approved by the board? Context: on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 , of which $ 1.43 billion had been repurchased as of december 31 , 2009 . ### Output: Logic: the outstanding amount is the difference in the amount authorized and the amount acquired The required values from the context for the question are: Total authorized share repurchase program: $8 billion Amount repurchased as of December 31, 2009: $1.43 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1.43 from 8 which gives subtract(8, 1.43) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 8 which gives divide(subtract(8, 1.43), 8) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(8, 1.43), 8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(8, 1.43), 8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is due in 2019? Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 17 ; the 2020 of amount is 15 ; the 2021 of amount is 12 ; the 2022 of amount is 11 ; the 2023 of amount is 6 ; the thereafter of amount is 80 ; ### Output: Logic: from here you need to take the amount due in 2019 or $ 17 and divide it by the total or 141 to get 12.1% The required values from the context for the question are: Amount due in 2019: $17 Total amount due (sum of all years): $141 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 17 to 15 which gives add(17, 15) step 2: add 12 to 11 which gives add(12, 11) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)) step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 80 which gives add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80) step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2007 , how many shares belonged to the shareholders? Context: on august 1 , 2007 the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.75 per share to be paid on september 14 , 2007 to shareholders of record on august 15 , 2007 . the company paid out a dividend in the amount of $ 162531 . ### Output: Logic: if the company paid out $ 0.75 per share , then the number of shares of the stockholders is going to be the total amount of dividends paid ( $ 162531 ) divided by $ 0.75 . The required values from the context for the question are: Dividend per share: $0.75 Total dividend paid: $162531 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 162531 by 0.75 which gives divide(162531, 0.75), The final logic expression is divide(162531, 0.75). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the percentage of income from operations of discontinued operations concerning income from discontinued operations net of tax? Context: the income from operations of discontinued operations of 2014 is .7 ; the income from operations of discontinued operations of 2013 is 3.6 ; the income from operations of discontinued operations of 2012 is 47.3 ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2014 is $ 4.6 ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2013 is $ -10.0 ( 10.0 ) ; the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax of 2012 is $ 168.1 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the income from operations of discontinued operations divided by the total income from discontinued operations net of tax's , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Income from operations of discontinued operations in 2014: 0.7 Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of tax in 2014: $4.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide .7 by 4.6 which gives divide(.7, 4.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(.7, 4.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(.7, 4.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2013 charge , what is the percentage of the asset actions on the total charge? Context: the 2013 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 71.9 ; the 2013 charge of asset actions is $ 100.4 ; the 2013 charge of contract actions/ other is $ 59.3 ; the 2013 charge of total is $ 231.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the asset actions divided by the total charge , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2013 charge of asset actions: $100.4 2013 charge total: $231.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 100.4 by 231.6 which gives divide(100.4, 231.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(100.4, 231.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(100.4, 231.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of trademarks and patents , in number of years?\\n Context: customer relationships the trademarks of 25 is 25 ; the trademarks of years is years ; customer relationships the completed technology/patents of 25 is 10 ; the completed technology/patents of years is years ; intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those weighted-average useful lives . The required values from the context for the question are: Weighted average useful lives of trademarks: 25 years Weighted average useful lives of technology/patents: 10 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 10 from 25 which gives subtract(25, 10), The final logic expression is subtract(25, 10). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total amount lost from the bond authorization to the withdrawn? Context: the franklin kentucky distribution center of bond term is 30 years ; the franklin kentucky distribution center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 54.0 ; the franklin kentucky distribution center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 51.8 ; the macon georgia distribution center of bond term is 15 years ; the macon georgia distribution center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 58.0 ; the macon georgia distribution center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 49.9 ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of bond term is 10 years ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of bond authorized amount ( in millions ) is $ 78.0 ; the brentwood tennessee store support center of amount drawn ( in millions ) is $ 75.3 ; the tax abatement plans provide for reduction of real property taxes for specified time frames by legally transferring title to its real property in exchange for industrial revenue bonds . the tax abatement period extends through the term of the lease , which coincides with the maturity date of the bonds . ### Output: Logic: to find out the amount of money lost we must compare the authorization to the withdraw of all 3 bonds . then once you find the difference of these bonds you will add together the differences to get $ 13 million The required values from the context for the question are: Franklin Kentucky distribution center authorized amount: $54.0 million Franklin Kentucky distribution center drawn amount: $51.8 million Macon Georgia distribution center authorized amount: $58.0 million Macon Georgia distribution center drawn amount: $49.9 million Brentwood Tennessee store support center authorized amount: $78.0 million Brentwood Tennessee store support center drawn amount: $75.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 51.8 from 54.0 which gives subtract(54.0, 51.8) step 2: subtract 75.3 from 78.0 which gives subtract(78.0, 75.3) step 3: subtract 49.9 from 58.0 which gives subtract(58.0, 49.9) step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9)) step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(subtract(54.0, 51.8), add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9))), The final logic expression is add(subtract(54.0, 51.8), add(subtract(78.0, 75.3), subtract(58.0, 49.9))). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the operating leases in 2007 as part of the total amount? Context: contractual commitments the operating leases of total is $ 691 ; the operating leases of payment period 2007 is $ 191 ; the operating leases of payment period 2008 - 2009 is $ 205 ; the operating leases of payment period 2010 - 2011 is $ 106 ; the operating leases of payment period after 2011 is $ 189 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the 2007 amount divided by the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: Total of operating leases: $691 Operating leases payment for 2007: $191 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 191 by 691 which gives divide(191, 691) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(191, 691), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(191, 691), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of the future lease payments is has to be paid in 2009? Context: the 2009 of operating leases is $ 22883 ; future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases . the total future minimum lease payments of operating leases is $ 67446 ; ### Output: Logic: to figure out the percentage paid in 2009 , one must take the amount to be paid in 2009 and divide by the total amount to be paid . The required values from the context for the question are: Payment due in 2009 for operating leases: $22883 Total future minimum lease payments for operating leases: $67446 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 22883 by 67446 which gives divide(22883, 67446) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(22883, 67446), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(22883, 67446), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the firm's average sum of contractual principal , interest and fees in 2008 and 2009? Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the outstanding balance ( a ) of 2009 is $ 103369 ; the outstanding balance ( a ) of 2008 is $ 118180 ; the table below provides additional information about these pur- chased credit-impaired consumer loans. . ( a ) represents the sum of contractual principal , interest and fees earned at the reporting date . ### Output: Logic: add the two total sums from 2008 and 2009 and then divide by the total number of years ( 2 ) for the average . The required values from the context for the question are: Outstanding balance in 2009: $103369 million Outstanding balance in 2008: $118180 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 103369 to 118180 which gives add(103369, 118180) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(103369, 118180), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(103369, 118180), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease in the alumina production during 2014 and 2015 , in kmt? Context: the alumina production ( kmt ) of 2015 is 15720 ; the alumina production ( kmt ) of 2014 is 16606 ; the alumina production ( kmt ) of 2013 is 16618 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those two production values during 2015 and 2014 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2015 alumina production: 15720 kmt 2014 alumina production: 16606 kmt Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 15720 from 16606 which gives subtract(16606, 15720), The final logic expression is subtract(16606, 15720). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the highest adjusted ebitda observed? Context: the adjusted ebitda of 2017 is -158.4 ( 158.4 ) ; the adjusted ebitda of 2016 is -68.1 ( 68.1 ) ; the adjusted ebitda of 2015 is -66.2 ( 66.2 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of adjusted ebitda during these years . The required values from the context for the question are: 2017 adjusted ebitda: -158.4 2016 adjusted ebitda: -68.1 2015 adjusted ebitda: -66.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(adjusted ebitda, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest return for the second year of the investment? Context: the hum of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 152 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 214 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 267 ; the hum of 12/31/2016 is $ 307 ; the hum of 12/31/2017 is $ 377 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is $ 132 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is $ 150 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is $ 153 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2016 is $ 171 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2017 is $ 208 ; the peer group of 12/31/2012 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 137 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 175 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 186 ; the peer group of 12/31/2016 is $ 188 ; the peer group of 12/31/2017 is $ 238 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of the investment in the second year , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: hum of 12/31/2013: $152 hum of 12/31/2014: $214 s&p 500 of 12/31/2013: $132 s&p 500 of 12/31/2014: $150 peer group of 12/31/2013: $137 peer group of 12/31/2014: $175 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 214 which gives subtract(214, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(214, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(214, 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the long-term debt junior subordinated debt and at december 31 , 2009 compared to december 31 , 2008 Context: long-term debt at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 includes $ 19345 million and $ 24060 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . ### Output: Logic: the percent of the long-term debt junior subordinated debt and at december 31 , 2009 was equal to 80.4% of the december 31 , 2008 junior subordinated debt The required values from the context for the question are: December 31, 2009 junior subordinated debt: $19345 million December 31, 2008 junior subordinated debt: $24060 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 19345 by 24060 which gives divide(19345, 24060) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(19345, 24060), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(19345, 24060), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the high and average foreign exchange contracts , in millions of dollars? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 high is $ 27.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 low is $ 7.4 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2014 average is $ 18.9 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Year ended June 30 2014 high: $27.4 million Year ended June 30 2014 low: $7.4 million Year ended June 30 2014 average: $18.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 18.9 from 27.4 which gives subtract(27.4, 18.9), The final logic expression is subtract(27.4, 18.9). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of non-cancelable future minimum lease payments are current? Context: fiscal years ending march 31 , the 2019 of operating leases ( in $ 000s ) is $ 2078 ; fiscal years ending march 31 , the total minimum lease payments of operating leases ( in $ 000s ) is $ 10089 ; ### Output: Logic: current = due in 2019 The required values from the context for the question are: Fiscal year 2019 operating leases: $2078 (in $000s) Total minimum lease payments: $10089 (in $000s) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2078 by 10089 which gives divide(2078, 10089) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2078, 10089), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2078, 10089), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the change in the dividend yield from 2011 to 2012 Context: the dividend yield of 2012 is 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2011 is 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2010 is 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the change in the percent is the change from the early period to the most recent divide by the early period The required values from the context for the question are: Dividend yield 2012: 3.2% Dividend yield 2011: 2.7% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2.7 from 3.2 which gives subtract(3.2, 2.7) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2.7 which gives divide(subtract(3.2, 2.7), 2.7) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(3.2, 2.7), 2.7), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(3.2, 2.7), 2.7), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the percentage of unproved properties among the total properties? Context: the unproved properties of 2017 is 3710069 ; the unproved properties of 2016 is 3840126 ; the total of 2017 is 52555741 ; the total of 2016 is 49592091 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the capitalized costs related to unproved properties divided by the capitalized costs related to all properties , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Unproved properties 2016: 3840126 Total 2016: 49592091 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 3840126 by 49592091 which gives divide(3840126, 49592091) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(3840126, 49592091), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(3840126, 49592091), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: taking into account the 2014 charge related to the businesses for a segment , what is the percentage of the merchant gases segment concerning all of them? Context: the 2014 charge related to the businesses at the segment level as follows : $ 4.4 in merchant gases , $ 4.1 in tonnage gases , $ 2.4 in electronics and performance materials , and $ 1.8 in equipment and energy . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the merchant gases segment divided by the sum of all segments , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2014 charge in merchant gases: $4.4 2014 charge in tonnage gases: $4.1 2014 charge in electronics and performance materials: $2.4 2014 charge in equipment and energy: $1.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 4.4 to 4.1 which gives add(4.4, 4.1) step 2: add 2.4 to 1.8 which gives add(2.4, 1.8) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8)) step 4: divide 4.4 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(4.4, add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8))) step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4.4, add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8))), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(4.4, add(add(4.4, 4.1), add(2.4, 1.8))), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage increase of total fair value of share awards vested from 2007 to 2009? Context: the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase one must subtract the total fair value of share awards vested of 2009 by 2007's total fair value of share awards vested . then you will take this solution and divide it by 2007's total fair value of share awards vested The required values from the context for the question are: Fair value of share awards vested 2009: $6.2 million Fair value of share awards vested 2008: $4.1 million Fair value of share awards vested 2007: $1.7 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1.7 from 6.2 which gives subtract(6.2, 1.7) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1.7 which gives divide(subtract(6.2, 1.7), 1.7), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(6.2, 1.7), 1.7). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the restructuring charges paid to those incurred in 2018 Context: asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . ### Output: Logic: the percent of the amount paid to the amount incurred is the division of the amount paid by the amount incurred The required values from the context for the question are: Net gain on business divestitures: $44.9 million Paid during 2018 related to restructuring: $24.7 million Incurred restructuring charges 2018: $26.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 24.7 by 26.4 which gives divide(24.7, 26.4) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(24.7, 26.4), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(24.7, 26.4), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: assuming a 120 day inventory turn , how of the receivables balance at december 31 , 2010 , was collected in q1 2011 in billions? Context: the railroad collected approximately $ 18.8 billion and $ 16.3 billion of receivables during the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: 120 days = 4 months . 4 mos = 3 turns per year . The required values from the context for the question are: Receivables collected during year ended December 31, 2011: $18.8 billion Receivables collected during year ended December 31, 2010: $16.3 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 16.3 by const_3 which gives divide(16.3, const_3), The final logic expression is divide(16.3, const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the fair value of ars investments between 2009 and 2008? Context: the fair value december 31 2008 of significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) is $ 192 ; the fair value december 31 2009 of significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) is 180 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual decrease observed in the fair value of ars investments , which is calculated by subtracting the 2009's value of 2008 one , then dividing by the 2008 and turning it into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Fair value December 31, 2008 (Level 3): $192 million Fair value December 31, 2009 (Level 3): $180 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 192 from 180 which gives subtract(180, 192) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 192 which gives divide(subtract(180, 192), 192) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(180, 192), 192), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(180, 192), 192), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation between the useful lives of the structures and machinery and equipment by the global rolled products segment? Context: segment the global rolled products of structures is 31 ; the global rolled products of machinery and equipment is 21 ; the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of years . The required values from the context for the question are: Useful lives of structures (Global Rolled Products): 31 years Useful lives of machinery and equipment (Global Rolled Products): 21 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21 from 31 which gives subtract(31, 21), The final logic expression is subtract(31, 21). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2017-2018 , what is the increase observed in payment amount per share? Context: paymentdate the 2017 of amountper share is $ 1.49 ; the 2017 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 216 ; paymentdate the 2018 of amountper share is $ 1.90 ; the 2018 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 262 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the amount paid per share in 2018 divided by the 2017's , then transformed into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Amount per share 2017: $1.49 Total amount 2017: $216 million Amount per share 2018: $1.90 Total amount 2018: $262 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1.90 by 1.49 which gives divide(1.90, 1.49) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1.90, 1.49), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1.90, 1.49), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1.90, 1.49), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: at the weighted average price given what is the value of the number of securities to be issued Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 1955024 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 36.06 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4078093 ; ### Output: Logic: the value is the product of the number of shares and the price The required values from the context for the question are: Number of securities to be issued: 1955024 Weighted-average exercise price: $36.06 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1955024 by 36.06 which gives multiply(1955024, 36.06), The final logic expression is multiply(1955024, 36.06). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the variation between the fair value of the foreign exchange contracts and its high measured value-at-risk? Context: ( in millions ) the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2013 high is $ 24.5 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2013 low is $ 19.1 ; the foreign exchange contracts of year ended june 30 2013 average is $ 21.9 ; the fair value of those contracts as of june 30 , 2013 was approximately $ 4.6 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Foreign exchange contracts high (June 30, 2013): $24.5 million Foreign exchange contracts low (June 30, 2013): $19.1 million Fair value of contracts (June 30, 2013): $4.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4.6 from 24.5 which gives subtract(24.5, 4.6), The final logic expression is subtract(24.5, 4.6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the refund received from the canadian tax authorities , in comparison with the total net cash income taxes paid in 2016? Context: cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 10.4 million and $ 80.6 million , respectively . the 2016 net cash income taxes paid includes a refund of $ 46.2 million received from the canadian tax authorities . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the refund received divided by the total net cash income taxes , then turned into a percentage.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Net cash paid for income taxes 2016: $10.4 million Refund received from Canadian tax authorities: $46.2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 46.2 by 80.6 which gives divide(46.2, 80.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(46.2, 80.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(46.2, 80.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the expected benefits payment in 2009 and 2010? Context: 2009 the 2010 of $ 19766 is 18182 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the expected benefits payments for both years . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected benefits payment 2009: $19766 Expected benefits payment 2010: $18182 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 18182 from 19766 which gives subtract(19766, 18182), The final logic expression is subtract(19766, 18182). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of future annual commitments related to minimum quantities of purchased water having non-cancelable are due after 2023? Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 65 ; the 2020 of amount is 65 ; the 2021 of amount is 65 ; the 2022 of amount is 64 ; the 2023 of amount is 57 ; the thereafter of amount is 641 ; ### Output: Logic: the $ 957 above is the total amount . from here you need to take the total amount due ""thereafter"" or 641 and divide it by $ 957 to get 67% ( 641/957 = 67% ) The required values from the context for the question are: Amount due in 2019: $65 Amount due in 2020: $65 Amount due in 2021: $65 Amount due in 2022: $64 Amount due in 2023: $57 Amount due thereafter: $641 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 65 to 65 which gives add(65, 65) step 2: add 65 to 64 which gives add(65, 64) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)) step 4: add 57 to 641 which gives add(57, 641) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(65, 65), add(65, 64)), add(57, 641)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the 2008 maturities as a part of the total maturities Context: 2007 the 2008 of $ 130206 is 33117 ; 2007 the total maturities of $ 130206 is 2336989 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divided by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: 2008 maturities: $33117 Total maturities 2007: $2336989 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 33117 by 2336989 which gives divide(33117, 2336989) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(33117, 2336989), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(33117, 2336989), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the discrete ax benefit as a part of the balance at december 312013 Context: included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . balance at january 1 2011 the balance at december 31 2013 of $ 23788 is $ 13555 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage of a number is 2979 divide by the year end balance multiplied by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: Discrete tax benefit 2013: $2979 Balance at December 31, 2013: $13555 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2979 by 13555 which gives divide(2979, 13555) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2979, 13555), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2979, 13555), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of structures and machinery/equipment in the engineered products and solutions segment , in years? Context: the engineered products and solutions of structures is 29 ; the engineered products and solutions of machinery and equipment is 17 ; the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of years . The required values from the context for the question are: Engineered products and solutions of structures: 29 years Engineered products and solutions of machinery and equipment: 17 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 17 from 29 which gives subtract(29, 17), The final logic expression is subtract(29, 17). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase in the value of goodwill balances during 2008 and 2009? Context: our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2009 were $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , compared to $ 5.6 billion and $ 779 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2008 . ### Output: Logic: it is the 2009's goodwill divided by the 2008's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill balance at December 31, 2009: $6.1 billion Goodwill balance at December 31, 2008: $5.6 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 6.1 by 5.6 which gives divide(6.1, 5.6) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(6.1, 5.6), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(6.1, 5.6), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(6.1, 5.6), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the approximate customer penetration for the total regulated businesses? Context: our regulated utilities own substantially all of the assets used by our regulated businesses . new jersey the total regulated businesses of operating revenues ( in millions ) $ 639.0 is $ 2564.4 ; the total regulated businesses of % ( % ) of total 24.9% ( 24.9 % ) is 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) ; the total regulated businesses of number of customers 639838 is 3158226 ; the total regulated businesses of % ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % ) is 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) ; the total regulated businesses of estimated population served ( in millions ) 2.5 is 11.4 ; the total regulated businesses of % ( % ) of total 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) is 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: customer penetration - customers divided by total population in those states The required values from the context for the question are: Total regulated businesses number of customers: 639838 Estimated population served by total regulated businesses: 11.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 11.4 by const_1000000 which gives multiply(11.4, const_1000000) step 2: multiply 3158226 by the expression of step 1 which gives multiply(3158226, multiply(11.4, const_1000000)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(3158226, multiply(11.4, const_1000000)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(3158226, multiply(11.4, const_1000000)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering one year of investment , what is the variation between the return provided by arconic inc . and the one provided by s&p 500 aeindustrials index? Context: as of december 31 , the arconic inc . of 2013 is $ 100 ; the arconic inc . of 2014 is $ 149.83 ; the arconic inc . of 2015 is $ 94.62 ; the arconic inc . of 2016 is $ 80.22 ; the arconic inc . of 2017 is $ 119.02 ; the arconic inc . of 2018 is $ 74.47 ; as of december 31 , the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2014 is 109.83 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2015 is 107.04 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2016 is 127.23 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2017 is 153.99 ; the s&p 500 aeindustrials index of 2018 is 133.53 ; the graph assumes , in each case , an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the percentage of return of the initial $ 100 in both indices . The required values from the context for the question are: Arconic Inc. 2017: $119.02 Arconic Inc. 2016: $80.22 S&P 500 aeindustrials index 2017: 153.99 S&P 500 aeindustrials index 2016: 127.23 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 109.83 by 100 which gives divide(109.83, 100) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1) step 3: divide 149.83 by 100 which gives divide(149.83, 100) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(149.83, 100), const_1), subtract(divide(109.83, 100), const_1)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the average price paid per share during november and december of 2013? Context: period the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of average price paid per share is 98.18 ; the november 2013 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 1191867 ; the november 2013 of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is 664123417 ; period the december 2013 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 802930 ; the december 2013 of average price paid per share is 104.10 ; the december 2013 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) is 802930 ; the december 2013 of dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 ) is 580555202 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the average price paid per share during december divided by november's one , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Average price paid per share, November 2013: 98.18 Average price paid per share, December 2013: 104.10 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 104.10 by 98.18 which gives divide(104.10, 98.18) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(104.10, 98.18), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(104.10, 98.18), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(104.10, 98.18), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much was the total operating expenses in 2016 in millions of dollars? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the total of year-over-yearchange is $ 54.4 ; the total of change as apercentage of2015 expenses is 4% ( 4 % ) ; 2016 compared with 2015 operating expenses increased by $ 54.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015 . ### Output: Logic: considering the increase of $ 544 as a 4% variation , the original value is calculated dividing $ 54.4 by its percentage , then adding the original value plus the variation . The required values from the context for the question are: Increase in operating expenses 2016 compared to 2015: $54.4 million Change as a percentage of 2015 expenses: 4% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 54.4 by 4% which gives divide(54.4, 4%) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 54.4 which gives add(divide(54.4, 4%), 54.4), The final logic expression is add(divide(54.4, 4%), 54.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average size of the 61 switching centers in square feet Context: the call center of approximate number is 17 ; the call center of approximate size in square feet is 1300000 ; the switching centers of approximate number is 61 ; the switching centers of approximate size in square feet is 1300000 ; ### Output: Logic: the average square feet is the total square feet divide by the number of locations The required values from the context for the question are: Switching centers approximate number: 61 Switching centers approximate size in total square feet: 1300000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1300000 by 61 which gives divide(1300000, 61), The final logic expression is divide(1300000, 61). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percent did the investor make on applied materials from the first 5 years compared to the 2016 to 2017 time period ? ( not including compound interest ) Context: the applied materials of 10/28/2012 is 100.00 ; the applied materials of 10/27/2013 is 171.03 ; the applied materials of 10/26/2014 is 207.01 ; the applied materials of 10/25/2015 is 165.34 ; the applied materials of 10/30/2016 is 293.64 ; the applied materials of 10/29/2017 is 586.91 ; applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . ### Output: Logic: to see the difference between the years one will need to calculate the total percentage change over those years . for the first 5 years its pretty easy because we started with $ 100 making it a 193% return . for the years 2016 to 2017 , one needs to subtract the starting price by the ending price and then divide that number by the starting price . this gives us a 99.9% return in 2016 to 2017 . The required values from the context for the question are: Applied materials 10/28/2012: 100.00 Applied materials 10/30/2016: 293.64 Applied materials 10/29/2017: 586.91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 293.64 from 586.91 which gives subtract(586.91, 293.64) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 293.64 which gives divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64) step 3: subtract const_100 from 293.64 which gives subtract(293.64, const_100) step 4: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(293.64, const_100), divide(subtract(586.91, 293.64), 293.64)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in comparison to overall information technology sector , how much percentage would global payments have earned the investor . Context: the may 31 2002 of global payments is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p 500 is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p information technology is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2003 of global payments is 94.20 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p 500 is 91.94 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p information technology is 94.48 ; the may 31 2004 of global payments is 129.77 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p 500 is 108.79 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p information technology is 115.24 ; the may 31 2005 of global payments is 193.30 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p 500 is 117.75 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p information technology is 116.29 ; the may 31 2006 of global payments is 260.35 ; the may 31 2006 of s&p 500 is 127.92 ; the may 31 2006 of s&p information technology is 117.14 ; the may 31 2007 of global payments is 224.24 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p 500 is 157.08 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p information technology is 144.11 ; global payments s&p 500 information technology . ### Output: Logic: to calculate how much greater the return was for global payments , one must find the percentage gain of the s&p information technology and global payments . then one must subtract these two percentages to find the change between the two . The required values from the context for the question are: Global payments May 31 2002: $100.00 Global payments May 31 2007: 224.24 S&P information technology May 31 2002: $100.00 S&P information technology May 31 2007: 144.11 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 144.11 which gives subtract(144.11, const_100) step 2: subtract const_100 from 224.24 which gives subtract(224.24, const_100) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(224.24, const_100), subtract(144.11, const_100)), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(224.24, const_100), subtract(144.11, const_100)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 , how much was lost due to the decrease in net income? Context: operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . ### Output: Logic: to figure out the decrease in net income , one must take total change without net income and subtract it by the change between the years . this should give you $ 47.9 million . The required values from the context for the question are: Net cash provided by operating activities 2013: $592.9 million Increase in net cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012: $235.7 million Improvement in working capital usage: $283.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 235.7 from 283.6 which gives subtract(283.6, 235.7), The final logic expression is subtract(283.6, 235.7). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the deferred purchase price receivable during 2015 and 2016? Context: as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the deferred purchase price receivable was $ 83 and $ 249 , respectively , which was included in other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual variation between the deferred purchase price receivable in 2016 and 2015 , that is calculated by subtracting the final value of the initial value then dividing and turning it into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Deferred purchase price receivable for 2016: $83 Deferred purchase price receivable for 2015: $249 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 249 from 83 which gives subtract(83, 249) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 249 which gives divide(subtract(83, 249), 249) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(83, 249), 249), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(83, 249), 249), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31 , 2017 what was the ratio of restricted cash and marketable securities for the supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability to the total restricted cash and marketable securities Context: accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . ### Output: Logic: the percent of the amount set aside from the total restricted cash and marketable securities to the to the total restricted cash and marketable securities was 50.6% The required values from the context for the question are: Total restricted cash and marketable securities as of December 31, 2017: $141.1 million Restricted cash and marketable securities supporting insurance programs as of December 31, 2017: $71.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 71.4 by 141.1 which gives divide(71.4, 141.1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(71.4, 141.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(71.4, 141.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: based on the table , what was the fair value price of global payments common stock given to active network stockholders? Context: cash consideration paid to active network stockholders the fair value of global payments common stock issued to active network stockholders of $ 599497 is 572079 ; cash consideration paid to active network stockholders the total purchase consideration of $ 599497 is $ 1171576 ; we funded the cash portion of the total purchase consideration primarily by drawing on our revolving credit facility ( described in 201cnote 7 2014 long-term debt and lines of credit 201d ) . ### Output: Logic: the valuation of the common stock would be $ 1 because the total amount of money issued subtracted by the cash consolidation . that remainder equals the same amount of shares which concludes that the share price would be $ 1 . The required values from the context for the question are: Fair value of Global Payments common stock issued to Active Network stockholders: $599,497 Total purchase consideration: $1,171,576 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 572079 to 599497 which gives add(572079, 599497), The final logic expression is add(572079, 599497). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is payable in 2022? Context: the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ; the 2019 of amount is 14 ; the 2020 of amount is 12 ; the 2021 of amount is 9 ; the 2022 of amount is 8 ; the thereafter of amount is 65 ; ### Output: Logic: from here you need to take the amount payable in 2018 , or $ 15 , and divide by the total or 123 to get 12.2% ( 15/123 = 12.2% ) The required values from the context for the question are: Amount payable in 2022: $8 Total amount payable (2018-2022 + thereafter): $15 + $14 + $12 + $9 + $8 + $65 = $123 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 12 to 9 which gives add(12, 9) step 2: add 15 to 14 which gives add(15, 14) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)) step 4: add 8 to 65 which gives add(8, 65) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in comparing 2010 and 2012 figures , how much additional capital , in percentage , is required in 2012 for the firm to meet regulatory and debt obligations? Context: year ended december 31 ( in billions ) the other ( a ) of yearly average 2012 is 50.2 ; the other ( a ) of yearly average 2011 is 46.6 ; the other ( a ) of yearly average 2010 is 34.5 ; the firm measures economic capital primarily based on four risk factors : credit , market , operational and private equity risk. . ( a ) reflects additional capital required , in the firm 2019s view , to meet its regulatory and debt rating objectives . ### Output: Logic: 34.5*x=50.2 The required values from the context for the question are: Yearly average for 2012: 50.2 Yearly average for 2010: 34.5 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 50.2 by 34.5 which gives divide(50.2, 34.5) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(50.2, 34.5), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(50.2, 34.5), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage growth in operating expenses from 2013 to 2014 Context: the total operating expenses net of 2014 is 19 ; the total operating expenses net of 2013 is 26 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent growth from year to year is the change from year to year divided by the base year The required values from the context for the question are: Total operating expenses for 2014: 19 Total operating expenses for 2013: 26 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 26 from 19 which gives subtract(19, 26) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 26 which gives divide(subtract(19, 26), 26) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(19, 26), 26), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(19, 26), 26), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the anticipated growth rate of the unrecognized tax benefits in 2008 Context: we expect our unrecognized tax benefits to increase by $ 2.7 million during 2008 . included in the unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9.4 million at december 31 , 2007 was $ 9.4 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would reduce our annual effective tax rate . ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change divided by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: Expected increase in unrecognized tax benefits during 2008: $2.7 million Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007: $9.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2.7 by 9.4 which gives divide(2.7, 9.4) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2.7, 9.4), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2.7, 9.4), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the change in value of unvested grants from 2014 to 2016? Context: the unvested at may 31 2014 of shares is 1754 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 22.72 ; the unvested at may 31 2016 of shares is 1606 ; the unvested at may 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 37.25 ; the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . ### Output: Logic: to find the change in unvested grants one must find the value of each unvested grant by multiplying the price by the amount . the one must subtract the two years from each other to find the change . The required values from the context for the question are: Unvested shares at May 31, 2014: 1,754 Weighted-average grant-date fair value at May 31, 2014: $22.72 Unvested shares at May 31, 2016: 1,606 Weighted-average grant-date fair value at May 31, 2016: $37.25 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1754 by 22.72 which gives multiply(1754, 22.72) step 2: multiply 1606 by 37.25 which gives multiply(1606, 37.25) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(1606, 37.25), multiply(1754, 22.72)), The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(1606, 37.25), multiply(1754, 22.72)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage of consolidated net sales from 2006 to 2008? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 8093 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 5400 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is 43% ( 43 % ) ; in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 and 13% ( 13 % ) in 2006 . ### Output: Logic: to find the consolidated net sales one must take the percentages given in line 17 and multiple it by the segmented net sales given in the table . the two products are then subtracted from each other . the answer is then divided by the consolidated net sales for 2006 . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment net sales for 2008: $8,093 million Segment net sales for 2007: $7,729 million Segment net sales for 2006: $5,400 million Segment net sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales for 2008: 27% Segment net sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales for 2007: 21% Segment net sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales for 2006: 13% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 5400 by 13% which gives multiply(5400, 13%) step 2: multiply 8093 by 27% which gives multiply(8093, 27%) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(8093, 27%), multiply(5400, 13%)) step 4: multiply 5400 by 13% which gives multiply(5400, 13%) step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(8093, 27%), multiply(5400, 13%)), multiply(5400, 13%)), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(multiply(8093, 27%), multiply(5400, 13%)), multiply(5400, 13%)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total net revenue between 2009 and 2010 Context: the 2009 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 243.0 ; the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 272.9 ; ### Output: Logic: [3] : gross operating revenues gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to : a decrease of $ 16.2 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates ; a decrease of $ 15.4 million in gross gas revenues primarily due to lower fue The required values from the context for the question are: Net revenue for 2009: $243.0 million Net revenue for 2010: $272.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 272.9 to 243.0 which gives add(272.9, 243.0), The final logic expression is add(272.9, 243.0). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index? Context: december 31 ( in dollars ) the jpmorgan chase of 2012 is $ 100.00 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2013 is $ 136.71 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2014 is $ 150.22 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2015 is $ 162.79 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2016 is $ 219.06 ; the jpmorgan chase of 2017 is $ 277.62 ; december 31 ( in dollars ) the kbw bank index of 2012 is 100.00 ; the kbw bank index of 2013 is 137.76 ; the kbw bank index of 2014 is 150.66 ; the kbw bank index of 2015 is 151.39 ; the kbw bank index of 2016 is 194.55 ; the kbw bank index of 2017 is 230.72 ; ### Output: Logic: outperform = greater 5 year total return The required values from the context for the question are: JPMorgan Chase 2012: $100.00 JPMorgan Chase 2017: $277.62 KBW Bank Index 2012: 100.00 KBW Bank Index 2017: 230.72 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is greater(277.62, 230.72). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the labor-related deemed claim to the total re-organization costs in 2013 Context: the labor-related deemed claim ( 1 ) of 2013 is $ 1733 ; the total reorganization items net of 2013 is $ 2640 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the amount divided by the total amount multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: Labor-related deemed claim for 2013: $1,733 Total reorganization items for 2013: $2,640 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1733 by 2640 which gives divide(1733, 2640) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1733, 2640), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1733, 2640), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how bigger are the expenses with depreciation depletion and amortization as a percent of capital expenditures in 2016? Context: for the year ended december 31 , the depreciation depletion and amortization of 2016 is $ 593 ; for the year ended december 31 , the capital expenditures of 2016 is $ 298 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the depreciation depletion and amortization expenses divided by capital expenditures , then subtracted 1 , which is going to represent the percentual increase of the depreciation depletion and amortization concerning the capital expenditures expenses . The required values from the context for the question are: Depreciation, depletion, and amortization for 2016: $593 Capital expenditures for 2016: $298 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 593 by 298 which gives divide(593, 298) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(593, 298), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(593, 298), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(593, 298), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: based on the year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) information what was the net profit margin Context: the revenue of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is $ 9362.2 ; the revenue of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is $ 9244.9 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is 285.7 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is 423.2 ; ### Output: Logic: the net profit margin is the net income divide by the revenues The required values from the context for the question are: Revenue for 2008: $9,362.2 million Net income for 2008: 285.7 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 285.7 by 9362.2 which gives divide(285.7, 9362.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based per year? Context: as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years . ### Output: Logic: to find the average per year one must take the total and divide that by the amount of years . The required values from the context for the question are: Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards as of May 31, 2016: $42.6 million Weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized: 1.9 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 42.6 by 1.9 which gives divide(42.6, 1.9), The final logic expression is divide(42.6, 1.9). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of the assets , purchased in the acquisition , are tangible? Context: goodwill the customer-related intangible assets of $ 6286 is 3248 ; goodwill the contract-based intangible assets of $ 6286 is 952 ; money transfer branch locations during 2009 , we completed the second and final series of money transfer branch location acquisitions in the united states as part of an assignment and asset purchase agreement with a privately held company . goodwill the property and equipment of $ 6286 is 300 ; goodwill the total assets acquired of $ 6286 is 11010 ; ### Output: Logic: tangible assets do not include goodwill , nontangible assets , and trademark . therefore we must divide equipment by total assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Total assets acquired: $11010 Property and equipment (tangible asset) value: $300 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 300 to 11010 which gives add(300, 11010) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(add(300, 11010), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(add(300, 11010), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what would be the total amount of long-term debt if they were to include fair value of debt step-up? Context: ( in millions ) the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period total is $ 6039.0 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2019 is $ 726.6 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2020and 2021 is $ 824.8 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period fiscal 2022and 2023 is $ 1351.0 ; the long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 ) of payments due by period thereafter is $ 3136.6 ; ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 205.2 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . ### Output: Logic: to find the total long-term debt you need to add up all the years from the table . this should give you $ 12078 million . then , as in the question , you need to add in the fair value of debt step-up which was $ 205.2 million . this puts your total at $ 12283.2 million . The required values from the context for the question are: Total long-term debt (from all years provided): $6039.0 million Fair value of debt step-up: $205.2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 824.8 to 726.6 which gives add(824.8, 726.6) step 2: add 6039.0 to 205.2 which gives add(6039.0, 205.2) step 3: add 3136.6 to 1351.0 which gives add(3136.6, 1351.0) step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(add(6039.0, 205.2), add(3136.6, 1351.0)) step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(824.8, 726.6), add(add(6039.0, 205.2), add(3136.6, 1351.0))), The final logic expression is add(add(824.8, 726.6), add(add(6039.0, 205.2), add(3136.6, 1351.0))). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much more operational risk , in billions , did the firm take on in 2010 and 2011 combined than in 2012? Context: year ended december 31 ( in billions ) the operational risk of yearly average 2012 is 15.9 ; the operational risk of yearly average 2011 is 8.5 ; the operational risk of yearly average 2010 is 7.4 ; operational risk capital operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes or systems , human factors or external events . the operational risk capital model is based on actual losses and potential scenario-based losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment . the increase in operational risk capital in 2012 was primarily due to continued model enhancements to better capture large historical loss events , including mortgage-related litigation costs . the increases that occurred during 2012 will be fully reflected in average operational risk capital in 2013 . see operational risk management on pages 175 2013176 of this annual report for more information about operational risk . ### Output: Logic: the total of operational risk of 2010 ( 7.4 ) and 2011 ( 8.5 ) equals 15.9 , the same number in billions of operational risk in 2012 ( 15.9 ) The required values from the context for the question are: Operational risk in 2012: 15.9 billion Operational risk in 2011: 8.5 billion Operational risk in 2010: 7.4 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 8.5 to 7.4 which gives add(8.5, 7.4) step 2: add 8.5 to 7.4 which gives add(8.5, 7.4) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(add(8.5, 7.4), add(8.5, 7.4)), The final logic expression is subtract(add(8.5, 7.4), add(8.5, 7.4)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease in the number of dollars obtained with the sale of primary aluminum during 2013 and 2014? Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5591 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 6800 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 6596 ; the sale of primary aluminum represents approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of this segment 2019s third-party sales . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of third-party sales of primary aluminum in 2014 and 2013 . The required values from the context for the question are: Third-party sales of primary aluminum in 2013: $6596 Third-party sales of primary aluminum in 2014: $6800 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 6596 by 90% which gives multiply(6596, 90%) step 2: multiply 6800 by 90% which gives multiply(6800, 90%) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(6800, 90%), multiply(6596, 90%)), The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(6800, 90%), multiply(6596, 90%)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentual decrease observed in alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum during 2014 and 2015? Context: the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum* of 2015 is $ 3514 ; the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum* of 2014 is $ 3743 ; the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum* of 2013 is $ 3730 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual decrease of alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum , which is calculated by dividing the value in 2015 by the value in 2014 , then turned into a percentage.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2015: $3514 Average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014: $3743 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 3743 by 3514 which gives divide(3743, 3514) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(subtract(divide(3743, 3514), const_1), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the number of units necessary to stabilize the acklen west end community? Context: community the acklen west end of market is nashville tn ; the acklen west end of units is 320 ; the acklen west end of closing date is december 28 2017 ; communities are considered stabilized after achieving 90% ( 90 % ) occupancy for 90 days . ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum percentage of 90% multiplied by the number of units . The required values from the context for the question are: Total units in the Acklen West End community: 320 Required occupancy rate for stabilization: 90% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 90% by 320 which gives multiply(90%, 320), The final logic expression is multiply(90%, 320). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the sfas 158 adoption adjustments for the deferred taxes to the amount prior to the adjustments Context: the deferred taxes ( current ) of prior to application of sfas 158 is $ 191 ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of sfas 158 adoption adjustments is $ -28 ( 28 ) ; the deferred taxes ( current ) of after application of sfas 158 is $ 163 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent change is the amount divide by the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: Deferred taxes prior to the application of SFAS 158: $191 SFAS 158 adoption adjustments: -$28 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 28 by const_m1 which gives multiply(28, const_m1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 191 which gives divide(multiply(28, const_m1), 191) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(multiply(28, const_m1), 191), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(multiply(28, const_m1), 191), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the original value of computer software , in dollars? Context: december 31 2015 the computer software of gross carrying amount is $ 793 ; the computer software of accumulated amortization is $ -643 ( 643 ) ; december 31 , 2015 carrying amount accumulated amortization . ### Output: Logic: the original value is calculated based upon the gross carrying amount formula , in which the carrying amount is equal to the original value mines the amortization/depreciation costs . The required values from the context for the question are: Gross carrying amount of computer software in 2015: $793 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 793 to 643 which gives add(793, 643), The final logic expression is add(793, 643). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2011 , what is the percentage of capital leases among the total future minimum payments? Context: the 2011 of total is 80823 ; the 2011 of capital leases is 1978 ; the 2011 of operating leases is 11555 ; the 2011 of sponsorship licensing & other is 67290 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of capital leases divided by the total value of future minimum payments , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Total future minimum payments in 2011: 80823 Capital leases in 2011: 1978 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1978 by 80823 which gives divide(1978, 80823) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1978, 80823), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1978, 80823), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2015 what is the anticipated percentage increase in aircraft fuel expense from 2014 Context: based on our 2015 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that , as of december 31 , 2014 , a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price would increase our 2015 annual fuel expense by $ 43 million . year the 2014 of gallons is 3644 ; the 2014 of average price per gallon is $ 2.91 ; the 2014 of aircraft fuel expense is $ 10592 ; the 2014 of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the percent increase is the change divided by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: Gallons in 2014: 3644 Average price per gallon in 2014: $2.91 Aircraft fuel expense in 2014: $10592 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 43 by 10592 which gives divide(43, 10592) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(43, 10592), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(43, 10592), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual increase expense related to these plans during 2002 and 2003? Context: during the years ended december 25 , 2004 , december 27 , 2003 , and december 28 , 2002 , expense related to these plans of $ 5183 , $ 4197 , and $ 2728 , respectively , was charged to operations . ### Output: Logic: it is the 2003's expense divided by 2002 one . The required values from the context for the question are: Expense related to the plans in 2002: $2728 Expense related to the plans in 2003: $4197 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4197 by 2728 which gives divide(4197, 2728) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(4197, 2728), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(4197, 2728), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(4197, 2728), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease between the goodwill impairment recorded by alcoa during the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2015? Context: therefore , in the fourth quarter of 2015 , alcoa recorded a goodwill impairment of $ 25 . therefore , in the fourth quarter of 2013 , alcoa recorded a goodwill impairment of $ 1731 ( $ 1719 after noncontrolling interest ) . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those two goodwill impairment recorded values . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2015: $25 Goodwill impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013: $1731 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 25 from 1731 which gives subtract(1731, 25), The final logic expression is subtract(1731, 25). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016 and 2017 , what is the increase observed in accretion? Context: the accretion of 2017 is 34708 ; the accretion of 2016 is 32306 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2017's accretion divided by the 2016's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Accretion in 2016: 32306 Accretion in 2017: 34708 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 34708 by 32306 which gives divide(34708, 32306) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(34708, 32306), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(34708, 32306), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(34708, 32306), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: by what total amount , from 2013 to 2014 , did total derivative receivable balances decrease or payable balances increase? Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the derivatives cva ( b ) of 2014 is -2674 ( 2674 ) ; the derivatives cva ( b ) of 2013 is -2352 ( 2352 ) ; december 31 ( in millions ) the derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) of 2014 is -380 ( 380 ) ; the derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) of 2013 is -322 ( 322 ) ; ( b ) positive cva and dva/fva represent amounts that increased receivable balances or decreased payable balances ; negative cva and dva/fva represent amounts that decreased receivable balances or increased payable balances . ### Output: Logic: since negative cva/dva/fva result from decreased receivables or increased payables , add all negative cva/dva/fva for the two years . The required values from the context for the question are: Derivatives CVA 2014: -2674 Derivatives CVA 2013: -2352 Derivatives DVA and FVA 2014: -380 Derivatives DVA and FVA 2013: -322 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2674 to 2352 which gives add(2674, 2352) step 2: add 380 to 322 which gives add(380, 322) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(2674, 2352), add(380, 322)), The final logic expression is add(add(2674, 2352), add(380, 322)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31 . 2015 what was the % ( % ) of shares available for grant under the 2007 plan . Context: as of december 31 , 2015 , 8.4 shares were available for grant under the 2007 plan . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 . ### Output: Logic: the % available for grant is the ratio of the available amount to the amount authorized . The required values from the context for the question are: Shares available for grant as of December 31, 2015: 8.4 Total shares under the 2007 plan: 15.5 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 8.4 by 15.5 which gives divide(8.4, 15.5) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(8.4, 15.5), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(8.4, 15.5), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average expected volatility? Context: the expected volatility of 2016 is 32.48% ( 32.48 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2015 is 29.35% ( 29.35 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2014 is 32.18% ( 32.18 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all percentages of expected volatility divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected volatility 2016: 32.48% Expected volatility 2015: 29.35% Expected volatility 2014: 32.18% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_average(expected volatility, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(expected volatility, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(expected volatility, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the twelve months ended december 31 , 2017 , what was the percentual increase observed in total puds? Context: for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2017 , total puds increased by 110 mmboe to 1163 mmboe . ### Output: Logic: it is the total pud of 1163 mmboe at the end of the period divided by the initial one ( 110 mmboe ) , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Total PUDs increase: 110 mmboe Total PUDs end of 2017: 1163 mmboe Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1163 by 110 which gives divide(1163, 110) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1163, 110), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1163, 110), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1163, 110), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the class a common stocks , what is the percentage's increase of the number issued to participating employees in relation non-executive directors amidst 2016 and 2017? Context: in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: considering the class a common stocks issued between 2016 and 2017 , the ratio of the variation of stocks issued to employees and non directors is calculated dividing the number of shares issued in 2017 by the number issued in 2016 , then dividing both results . The required values from the context for the question are: Class A common stock issued to participating employees 2017: 19936 Class A common stock issued to participating employees 2016: 19858 Class A common stock issued to non-executive directors 2017: 19736 Class A common stock issued to non-executive directors 2016: 26439 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 19936 by 19858 which gives divide(19936, 19858) step 2: divide 19736 by 26439 which gives divide(19736, 26439) step 3: divide the expression of step 1 by the expression of step 2 which gives divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439)) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439)), const_1) step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439)), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(divide(19936, 19858), divide(19736, 26439)), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase observed in the export sales among net sales during 2008 and 2009? Context: segment information 2013 ( concluded ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 246 million , $ 277 million and $ 275 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of sales in 2009 divided by the 2008's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Export sales 2009: $277 million Export sales 2008: $275 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 277 by 275 which gives divide(277, 275) step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(277, 275), 1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(277, 275), 1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(277, 275), 1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much segmented net sales was earned in the north america in 2007? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 9164 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005 is $ 9037 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 20142006 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2006 20142005 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 . ### Output: Logic: in line 29 , it explains that 52% of segmented net sales was done in north america in 2007 . to find out how much net sales was created in north america we must multiple 52% by the 2007 segmented net sales . this then gives us $ 5207.3 The required values from the context for the question are: Segment net sales 2007: $10014 North America sales as a percentage of segment net sales in 2007: 52% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10014 by 52% which gives multiply(10014, 52%), The final logic expression is multiply(10014, 52%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for the $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , what percentage was the structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution? Context: during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million . upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . ### Output: Logic: converted the billions to millions The required values from the context for the question are: Stock repurchase program: $1.6 billion Structured stock repurchase agreement: $80.0 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1.6 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.6, const_1000) step 2: divide 80.0 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(80.0, multiply(1.6, const_1000)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(80.0, multiply(1.6, const_1000)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(80.0, multiply(1.6, const_1000)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average yearly benefit payment for the years 2015-2019? Context: the 2015 2013 2019 of benefit payments is 22686 ; the 2015 2013 2019 of expected subsidy receipts is 1071 ; the 2015 2013 2019 of net benefit payments is 21615 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all benefit payments for the years 2015-2019 divided by five ( the period ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Benefit payments 2015-2019: 22686 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 22686 by const_5 which gives divide(22686, const_5), The final logic expression is divide(22686, const_5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average equity as adjusted? Context: as of december 31 the equity as adjusted of 2008 is $ 5415 ; the equity as adjusted of 2007 is $ 6261 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of both values of equity as adjusted divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: Equity as adjusted 2008: $5415 Equity as adjusted 2007: $6261 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(equity as adjusted, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the combined number of equity compensation plans approved by security holders Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 2956907 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 35.01 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 2786760 ; ### Output: Logic: the combined amount is the sum of both security types The required values from the context for the question are: Securities to be issued upon exercise: 2956907 Securities remaining available for future issuance: 2786760 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2956907 to 2786760 which gives add(2956907, 2786760), The final logic expression is add(2956907, 2786760). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase observed in the accounts payable and other liabilities during the years 2008-2009 , in millions? Context: ( in millions ) the accounts payable andother liabilities of 2009 is 31 ; the accounts payable andother liabilities of 2008 is -285 ( 285 ) ; the accounts payable andother liabilities of 2007 is 2 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values during 2008 and 2009 . The required values from the context for the question are: Accounts payable and other liabilities 2009: 31 Accounts payable and other liabilities 2008: -285 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract -285 from 31 which gives subtract(31, -285), The final logic expression is subtract(31, -285). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual growth of the global products' atoi concerning the total atoi for all segments during the years 2014-2015? Context: the atoi of 2016 is $ 269 ; the atoi of 2015 is $ 225 ; the atoi of 2014 is $ 224 ; atoi for all reportable segments totaled $ 1087 in 2016 , $ 986 in 2015 , and $ 983 in 2014 . global rolled products ( 1 ) . ### Output: Logic: it s the difference between the percentage of global products' atoi of each year . The required values from the context for the question are: ATOI 2016: $269 ATOI 2015: $225 ATOI 2014: $224 ATOI for all reportable segments 2016: $1087 ATOI for all reportable segments 2015: $986 ATOI for all reportable segments 2014: $983 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 224 by 983 which gives divide(224, 983) step 2: divide 225 by 986 which gives divide(225, 986) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(225, 986), divide(224, 983)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(225, 986), divide(224, 983)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(225, 986), divide(224, 983)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for the years 2007-2009? Context: the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all contribution expenses in these years divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Contribution expense 2009: $40627 Contribution expense 2008: $35341 Contribution expense 2007: $26996 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 40627 to 35341 which gives add(40627, 35341) step 2: add 26996 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(26996, add(40627, 35341)) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(26996, add(40627, 35341)), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(26996, add(40627, 35341)), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the variation observed in the foreign currency translation , in millions? Context: the foreign currency translation of 2009 is 2 ; the foreign currency translation of 2008 is -6 ( 6 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: 2009 foreign currency translation: 2 2008 foreign currency translation: -6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract -6 from 2 which gives subtract(2, -6), The final logic expression is subtract(2, -6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in accrued capital expenditures during 2016 and 2017? Context: eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of accrued capital expenditures in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Accrued capital expenditures 2017: $475 million Accrued capital expenditures 2016: $388 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 475 by 388 which gives divide(475, 388) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(475, 388), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(475, 388), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(475, 388), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much has the balance increased in a percentage from 2016 to 2018? Context: the balance at end of fiscal year of 2018 is $ 229.4 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2017 is $ 219.1 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2016 is $ 177.2 ; the following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in millions ) : . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase you must first subtract 2018 by 2016 and then take that answer and divide by 2016 . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance 2018: $229.4 Balance 2016: $177.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 177.2 from 229.4 which gives subtract(229.4, 177.2) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 177.2 which gives divide(subtract(229.4, 177.2), 177.2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(229.4, 177.2), 177.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(229.4, 177.2), 177.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the depreciation expense with the production facilities within the merchant gases segment accumulated in 15 years? Context: the merchant gases of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 30 ; the merchant gases of increase life by 1 year is $ -20 ( 20 ) ; the depreciable lives of production facilities within the merchant gases segment are principally 15 years . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of years expected in its depreciable life multiplied by the increased life by a 1-year value . The required values from the context for the question are: Increase life by 1 year for merchant gases: $-20 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 15 by 20 which gives multiply(15, 20), The final logic expression is multiply(15, 20). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2015 , what is the impact of the large market among the same store portfolio? Context: the large market same store of year ended december 31 2015 is $ 168872 ; the large market same store of year ended december 31 2014 is $ 174957 ; the large market same store of increase is $ -6085 ( 6085 ) ; the large market same store of percentage increase is ( 3.5 ) % ( % ) ; the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2015 is 253880 ; the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2014 is 261015 ; the same store portfolio of increase is -7135 ( 7135 ) ; the same store portfolio of percentage increase is ( 2.7 ) % ( % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the large market same-store divided by the total same-store portfolio , then turned into a percentage to represent the impact . The required values from the context for the question are: Large market same store 2015: $168872 Same store portfolio 2015: 253880 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 168872 by 253880 which gives divide(168872, 253880) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(168872, 253880), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(168872, 253880), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the combined equity compensation plans approved by security holders Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 1955024 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 36.06 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4078093 ; ### Output: Logic: the combined amount is the sum The required values from the context for the question are: Securities to be issued: 1955024 Remaining securities for future issuance: 4078093 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1955024 to 4078093 which gives add(1955024, 4078093), The final logic expression is add(1955024, 4078093). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31 , 2013 , what is the value of securities remaining available for future issuance Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 2956907 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 35.01 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 2786760 ; ### Output: Logic: the value is the product of the number of securities and the price The required values from the context for the question are: Securities remaining for future issuance 2013: 2786760 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 2786760 by 35.01 which gives multiply(2786760, 35.01), The final logic expression is multiply(2786760, 35.01). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average operating margin? Context: years ended december 31 , the operating margin of 2011 is 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2010 is 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all operating margins divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating margin 2011: 19.3% Operating margin 2010: 18.6% Operating margin 2009: 14.3% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_average(operating margin, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(operating margin, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_average(operating margin, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual fluctuation of the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3's exposure net of all collateral in relation with the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 during 2017 and 2018? Context: rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 11831 ; the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of exposure net of all collateral is $ 11529 ; the aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 29% ( 29 % ) ; rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 6373 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between those percentual variations during 2017 and 2018 . The required values from the context for the question are: AAA/AAA to AA-/AA3 % exposure 2017: 31% AAA/AAA to AA-/AA3 % exposure 2018: 29% BB+/BA1 to B-/B3 % exposure 2017: 16 BB+/BA1 to B-/B3 % exposure 2018: 18 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 31% from 29% which gives subtract(29%, 31%) step 2: subtract 16 from 18 which gives subtract(18, 16) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(18, 16), subtract(29%, 31%)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(18, 16), subtract(29%, 31%)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(18, 16), subtract(29%, 31%)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2008-2010 , what is the average income from cash and cash investments , in millions? Context: the income from cash and cash investments of 2010 is $ 6 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2009 is $ 7 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2008 is $ 22 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all income from cash and cash investments' value for these years , then divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Income from cash and investments 2010: $6 Income from cash and investments 2009: $7 Income from cash and investments 2008: $22 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(income from cash and cash investments, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase in the increase to allowance value from 2015 to 2016? Context: december 31 , the increase to allowance of 2016 is 772 ; the increase to allowance of 2015 is 180 ; the increase to allowance of 2014 is 102 ; the following table details the changes in the valuation allowance: . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual increase observed in the increase to allowance value , which is calculated by dividing the 2016's value by the 2015's then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Increase to allowance 2016: 772 Increase to allowance 2015: 180 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 772 by 180 which gives divide(772, 180) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100) step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(772, 180), const_100), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the annual average number of liquid securities and other cash considerations? Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2014 is -19604 ( 19604 ) ; the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2013 is -14435 ( 14435 ) ; government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . ### Output: Logic: add the total number of liquid securities from 2013 and 2014 , to get 34039 million , and then divide by the total number of years , 2 . The required values from the context for the question are: Liquid securities and other cash collateral of 2014: 19604 Liquid securities and other cash collateral of 2013: 14435 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 19604 to 14435 which gives add(19604, 14435) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(19604, 14435), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(19604, 14435), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change in the 25 basis point decrease and increase in discount rate in 2012 in millions Context: ( $ in millions ) the 25 basis point decrease in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense is $ 18 ; the 25 basis point decrease in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in december 31 2011 obligations is $ 146 ; ( $ in millions ) the 25 basis point increase in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense is -17 ( 17 ) ; the 25 basis point increase in discount rate of increase ( decrease ) in december 31 2011 obligations is -154 ( 154 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net change in 2012 was the sum of the increase and decrease in the 25 basis point discount rate The required values from the context for the question are: 25 basis point decrease in 2012 expense: 18 25 basis point increase in 2012 expense: -17 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 18 to -17 which gives add(18, -17), The final logic expression is add(18, -17). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the british pound among the total foreign currency forward contracts? Context: at june 30 , 2013 , we had foreign currency forward contracts in the amount of $ 1579.6 million . the foreign currencies included in foreign currency forward contracts ( notional value stated in u.s . dollars ) are principally the british pound ( $ 426.2 million ) , euro ( $ 268.8 million ) , canadian dollar ( $ 198.6 million ) , swiss franc ( $ 111.5 mil- lion ) , australian dollar ( $ 92.1 million ) , thailand baht ( $ 75.5 million ) and hong kong dollar ( $ 58.1 million ) . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of dollars in the british pound divided by the total amount of foreign currency forward contracts . The required values from the context for the question are: Total foreign currency forward contracts: 1579.6 British pound value: 426.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 426.2 by 1579.6 which gives divide(426.2, 1579.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(426.2, 1579.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(426.2, 1579.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total sales revenue in 2015 in millions Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr is $ 1570 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 ) is $ 1745 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr is $ 1800 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 ) is $ 1905 ; ### Output: Logic: the sales is the sum of all quarterly sales The required values from the context for the question are: Sales and service revenues 2015 1st qtr: 1570 Sales and service revenues 2015 2nd qtr: 1745 Sales and service revenues 2015 3rd qtr: 1800 Sales and service revenues 2015 4th qtr: 1905 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1570 to 1745 which gives add(1570, 1745) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1800 which gives add(add(1570, 1745), 1800), The final logic expression is add(add(1570, 1745), 1800). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the statistical interval for 2017's interest income using 2016's interest income as a midpoint? Context: the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . ### Output: Logic: to find the statistical interval you need to subtract the change and also add the change to the year 2016 . this will give you a range of the next year to come . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 interest income: 20.1 Change in interest rate: 11.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 11.0 from 20.1 which gives subtract(20.1, 11.0), The final logic expression is subtract(20.1, 11.0). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the change in the rental amount from 2017 to 2018 in millions Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 29 million , $ 24 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ; ### Output: Logic: the change is the difference between the two periods The required values from the context for the question are: Rental expenses 2017: 29 Rental expenses 2018: 15 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 15 from 29 which gives subtract(29, 15), The final logic expression is subtract(29, 15). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2015 , what was the increase in the additions for tax positions of prior years , in dollars? Context: december 31 , the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2016 is - ; the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is 14 ; the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is 4 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those two additions for tax positions of prior years' values . The required values from the context for the question are: Additions for tax positions of 2015: 14 Additions for tax positions of 2014: 4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4 from 14 which gives subtract(14, 4), The final logic expression is subtract(14, 4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the number of units in charlotte at midtown and acklen west end? Context: community the charlotte at midtown of market is nashville tn ; the charlotte at midtown of units is 279 ; the charlotte at midtown of closing date is march 16 2017 ; community the acklen west end of market is nashville tn ; the acklen west end of units is 320 ; the acklen west end of closing date is december 28 2017 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of units at each location . The required values from the context for the question are: Units in Charlotte at Midtown: 279 Units in Acklen West End: 320 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 279 from 320 which gives subtract(320, 279), The final logic expression is subtract(320, 279). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012-2013 and the gaap basis , what was the percentual increase in the effective tax rate? Context: 2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between each year's effective tax rate . The required values from the context for the question are: Effective tax rate 2013: 21.9% Effective tax rate 2012: 22.8% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21.9 from 22.8 which gives subtract(22.8, 21.9) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(22.8, 21.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(22.8, 21.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual growth observed in the percentage of asset impairment costs concerning the restructuring and other charges costs during 2013 and 2014? Context: the asset impairments of 2015 is $ 335 ; the asset impairments of 2014 is $ 406 ; the asset impairments of 2013 is $ 116 ; the restructuring and other charges of 2015 is $ 1195 ; the restructuring and other charges of 2014 is $ 1168 ; the restructuring and other charges of 2013 is $ 782 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the percentage of asset impairment costs concerning the restructuring and other charges costs in 2013 and 2014 The required values from the context for the question are: Asset impairments 2014: 406 Asset impairments 2013: 116 Restructuring and other charges 2014: 1168 Restructuring and other charges 2013: 782 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 116 by 782 which gives divide(116, 782) step 2: divide 406 by 1168 which gives divide(406, 1168) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(406, 1168), divide(116, 782)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(406, 1168), divide(116, 782)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(406, 1168), divide(116, 782)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the percentual increase of the same store portfolio and the non-same store revenue during 2013 and 2014? Context: the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2014 is 498829 ; the same store portfolio of year ended december 31 2013 is 483658 ; the same store portfolio of increase is 15171 ; the same store portfolio of percentage increase is 3.1% ( 3.1 % ) ; the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2014 is 493349 ; the non-same store and other of year ended december 31 2013 is 151185 ; the non-same store and other of increase is 342164 ; the non-same store and other of percentage increase is 226.3% ( 226.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those percentages . The required values from the context for the question are: Same store portfolio 2014: 498829 Same store portfolio 2013: 483658 Non-same store and other 2014: 493349 Non-same store and other 2013: 151185 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3.1% from 226.3% which gives subtract(226.3%, 3.1%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(226.3%, 3.1%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(226.3%, 3.1%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the depreciation expense with the production facilities within the electronics and performance materials segment accumulated in 10 years? Context: the electronics and performance materials of decrease lifeby 1 year is $ 16 ; the electronics and performance materials of increase life by 1 year is $ -10 ( 10 ) ; the depreciable lives of production facilities within the electronics and performance materials segment , where there is not an associated long-term supply agreement , range from 10 to 15 years . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of years expected in its depreciable life multiplied by the increased life by a 1-year value . The required values from the context for the question are: Decrease life by 1 year in Electronics and Performance Materials: 16 Increase life by 1 year in Electronics and Performance Materials: -10 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 10 by 10 which gives multiply(10, 10), The final logic expression is multiply(10, 10). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: between 2015 and 2013 what was the average compensation expense related to the issuing of the stock award in millions Context: compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the average is the sum of all amounts divide by the number of amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Compensation expense related to stock awards 2015: 43 Compensation expense related to stock awards 2013: 44 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 43 to 34 which gives add(43, 34) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 44 which gives add(add(43, 34), 44) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(43, 34), 44), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(43, 34), 44), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the regulatory liability from 2016 to 2017 Context: the total regulatory liabilities of 2017 is $ 1664 ; the total regulatory liabilities of 2016 is $ 403 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divide by the begin balance The required values from the context for the question are: Regulatory liabilities 2017: $1664 Regulatory liabilities 2016: $403 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 403 from 1664 which gives subtract(1664, 403) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 403 which gives divide(subtract(1664, 403), 403), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(1664, 403), 403). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage increase in the allowance in doubtful accounts from 2009 to 2010 Context: the balance at end of year of 2010 is $ 185 ; the balance at end of year of 2009 is $ 160 ; the balance at end of year of 2008 is $ 133 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the recent amount less the prior amount divide by the prior amount The required values from the context for the question are: Balance at end of 2010: $185 Balance at end of 2009: $160 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 160 from 185 which gives subtract(185, 160) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 160 which gives divide(subtract(185, 160), 160), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(185, 160), 160). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for the three years of 2010 , 2011 and 2012 what was the net cash impact from the 2002 financing entities? Context: in millions the cash receipts ( c ) of 2012 is 252 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2011 is 192 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2010 is 3 ; in millions the cash payments ( d ) of 2012 is 159 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2011 is 244 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2010 is 8 ; ### Output: Logic: summing the inflows and outflows gives us a look a the contribution over the 3 years of the financing entities relationship and benefit or drag on the company . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash receipts 2012: 252 Cash receipts 2011: 192 Cash receipts 2010: 3 Cash payments 2012: 159 Cash payments 2011: 244 Cash payments 2010: 8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 159 to 244 which gives add(159, 244) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 8 which gives add(add(159, 244), 8) step 3: add 252 to 192 which gives add(252, 192) step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 3 which gives add(add(252, 192), 3) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(add(add(252, 192), 3), add(add(159, 244), 8)), The final logic expression is subtract(add(add(252, 192), 3), add(add(159, 244), 8)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the impact of the reclassification of non-controlling interests in equity? Context: as of december 31 the increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests of 2008 is 105 ; the increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests of 2007 is 40 ; as of december 31 the equity as adjusted of 2008 is $ 5415 ; the equity as adjusted of 2007 is $ 6261 ; as of december 31 the equity as previously reported of 2008 is $ 5310 ; the equity as previously reported of 2007 is $ 6221 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests divided by the original equity to calculate its percentual impact . The required values from the context for the question are: Increase for reclassification 2008: 105 Increase for reclassification 2007: 40 Equity as adjusted 2008: $5415 Equity as adjusted 2007: $6261 Equity as previously reported 2008: $5310 Equity as previously reported 2007: $6221 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 105 by 5310 which gives divide(105, 5310) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(105, 5310), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(105, 5310), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2013 to 2014 Context: we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $ 5.74 , $ 5.27 and $ 4.77 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period The required values from the context for the question are: Weighted-average estimated fair values 2014: $5.74 Weighted-average estimated fair values 2013: $5.27 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5.27 from 5.74 which gives subtract(5.74, 5.27) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 5.27 which gives divide(subtract(5.74, 5.27), 5.27) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(5.74, 5.27), 5.27), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(5.74, 5.27), 5.27), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the statistical interval that interest income can be affected during the next year based on the data from 2013? Context: during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . ### Output: Logic: to find a statistical interval , one must take the data from the year before ( 24.7 ) and add the amount that could change ( 16.4 ) and subtract the amount that could change . this would give you the interval that it would be in-between . The required values from the context for the question are: Interest income 2013: $24.7 Change in interest income: $16.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 16.4 from 24.7 which gives subtract(24.7, 16.4), The final logic expression is subtract(24.7, 16.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent increase in net cash from investing activities occurred between 2011 and 2012? Context: net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . ### Output: Logic: subtracting the old value by the new value eliminates the need to subtract 1 at the end . both work , but in this case it made more sense to do it this way . The required values from the context for the question are: Net cash used in investing 2012: $3245 million Net cash used in investing 2011: $587 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2658 from 3245 which gives subtract(3245, 2658) step 2: divide 2658 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(2658, subtract(3245, 2658)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2658, subtract(3245, 2658)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2658, subtract(3245, 2658)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2016? Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2554.7 ; the operating activities of 2017 is $ 2534.1 ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 2258.8 ; cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2018 is -1649.1 ( 1649.1 ) ; the investing activities of 2017 is -1417.7 ( 1417.7 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -864.8 ( 864.8 ) ; cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ; the financing activities of 2017 is -2040.9 ( 2040.9 ) ; the financing activities of 2016 is -860.2 ( 860.2 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2016 . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating activities 2016: $2258.8 Investing activities 2016: -864.8 Financing activities 2016: -860.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 864.8 from 2258.8 which gives subtract(2258.8, 864.8) step 2: subtract 860.2 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(2258.8, 864.8), 860.2), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(2258.8, 864.8), 860.2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total price for the kmr power corporation purchase in millions? Context: in december 2000 , the company acquired all of the outstanding shares of kmr power corporation ( 2018 2018kmr 2019 2019 ) , including the buyout of a minority partner in one of kmr 2019s subsidiaries , for approximately $ 64 million and assumed long-term liabilities of approximately $ 245 million . ### Output: Logic: cash paid plus the assumed debt is the actual price . The required values from the context for the question are: KMR Power corporation purchase: $64 million Assumed liabilities: $245 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 64 to 245 which gives add(64, 245), The final logic expression is add(64, 245). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of aso's members among the total commercial medical membership? Context: the aso of smart plans and other consumer membership is 236800 ; the aso of other commercial membership is 1406200 ; the aso of commercial medical membership is 1643000 ; the total commercial medical of smart plans and other consumer membership is 564700 ; the total commercial medical of other commercial membership is 2886900 ; the total commercial medical of commercial medical membership is 3451600 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of members of the aso plan divided by the total commercial medical membership , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: ASO of smart plans and other consumer membership: 236800 Total commercial medical membership: 3451600 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1643000 by 3451600 which gives divide(1643000, 3451600) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1643000, 3451600), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1643000, 3451600), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of fairvalue of contracts due after ten years among the total? Context: ( millions ) the due after ten years of amortizedcost is 1 ; the due after ten years of fairvalue is 1 ; ( millions ) the total fixed maturities of amortizedcost is $ 150 ; the total fixed maturities of fairvalue is $ 150 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of those contracts divided by the total , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Due after ten years of fairvalue: 1 Total fixed maturities of fairvalue: $150 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1 by 150 which gives divide(1, 150) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1, 150), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1, 150), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the properties with lease expiration dates in 2020 , what is the average occupied square footage? Context: property : the 2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas of occupied square footage is 414000 ; the 2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas of lease expiration dates is 2020 ; property : the 2300 discovery drive orlando florida of occupied square footage is 364000 ; the 2300 discovery drive orlando florida of lease expiration dates is 2020 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the occupied square footage for both years divided by two to represent the average . The required values from the context for the question are: 2601 Research Forest Drive occupied square footage: 414000 2300 Discovery Drive occupied square footage: 364000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 414000 to 364000 which gives add(414000, 364000) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(414000, 364000), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(414000, 364000), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: based on the 2014 actualassetallocation what was the debt to equity ratio Context: the debt securities of targetassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the debt securities of 2014actualassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the debt securities of 2013actualassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the total of targetassetallocation is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of 2014actualassetallocation is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of 2013actualassetallocation is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the equity securities of targetassetallocation is 30 ; the equity securities of 2014actualassetallocation is 30 ; the equity securities of 2013actualassetallocation is 30 ; ### Output: Logic: the debt to equity ratio is the ratio of the debt to equity in terms of the financing of the company The required values from the context for the question are: Debt securities of 2014actualassetallocation: 70% Equity securities of 2014actualassetallocation: 30 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 70 by 30 which gives divide(70, 30), The final logic expression is divide(70, 30). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the risk-free rate of return during 2008 and 2009? Context: the risk-free rate of return of 2009 is 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) ; the risk-free rate of return of 2008 is 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) ; the risk-free rate of return of 2007 is 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Risk-free rate of return of 2009: 2.5% Risk-free rate of return of 2008: 3.2% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2.5% from 3.2% which gives subtract(3.2%, 2.5%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(3.2%, 2.5%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(3.2%, 2.5%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percent did the income tax benefit increase from 2014 to 2016? Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2016 is $ 30809 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 21056 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 is $ 29793 ; the income tax benefit of 2016 is $ 9879 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 6907 ; the income tax benefit of 2014 is $ 7126 ; the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . ### Output: Logic: the tax benefit increased 38.6% , one can find this by subtracting 2016 by 2014 tax benefits . then taking the answer and dividing it by 2014 tax benefits . The required values from the context for the question are: Income tax benefit of 2016: $9879 Income tax benefit of 2014: $7126 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7126 from 9879 which gives subtract(9879, 7126) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7126 which gives divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(9879, 7126), 7126), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of warehouse locations are located in japan . Context: in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 78 locations throughout the world : 18 in europe , 21 in japan , 15 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 8 in china , 7 in korea , 6 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage one must divide the warehouse locations in japan by the total warehouse locations . The required values from the context for the question are: Warehouse locations in Japan: 21 Total warehouse locations: 78 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 21 by 78 which gives divide(21, 78) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(21, 78), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(21, 78), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate in diluted earnings per share from 2013 to 2014? Context: the diluted earnings per share of 2014 is $ 2.35 ; the diluted earnings per share of 2013 is $ 2.06 ; the diluted earnings per share of 2012 is $ 2.01 ; ### Output: Logic: the earnings growth rate is the change in earnings from year to year divided by the starting year ( ( 2.39-2.09 ) /2.09 ) *100? The required values from the context for the question are: Diluted earnings per share of 2014: $2.35 Diluted earnings per share of 2013: $2.06 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2.06 from 2.35 which gives subtract(2.35, 2.06) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(2.35, 2.06), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(2.35, 2.06), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what the total number of votes to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible Context: the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of affirmative is 141728743 ; the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of against is 297976 ; the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of abstentions is 156165 ; ### Output: Logic: the total number of votes is the sum of the votes 142182884 The required values from the context for the question are: Affirmative votes: 141728743 Against votes: 297976 Abstentions: 156165 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 141728743 to 297976 which gives add(141728743, 297976) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 156165 which gives add(add(141728743, 297976), 156165), The final logic expression is add(add(141728743, 297976), 156165). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the efficiently , in a percent , of converting segmented sales to operating earnings for 2006? Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 8093 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 5400 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is 43% ( 43 % ) ; ( dollars in millions ) the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2008 is 1496 ; the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2007 is 1213 ; the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2006 is 958 ; the operating earnings of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is 23% ( 23 % ) ; the operating earnings of 2007 20142006 is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the increase in net sales to the government and public safety market was primarily driven by : ( i ) increased net sales outside of north america , and ( ii ) the net sales generated by vertex standard co. , ltd. , a business the company acquired a controlling interest of in january 2008 , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . on a geographic basis , the segment 2019s net sales were higher in emea , asia and latin america and lower in north america . ### Output: Logic: to figure out the conversion of segmented sales to operating earnings one must take the operating earnings and divide it by the segmented net sales . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment net sales for 2006: $ 5400 Operating earnings for 2006: $ 958 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 958 by 5400 which gives divide(958, 5400), The final logic expression is divide(958, 5400). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the debt to equity ratio in 2015 Context: the long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value of 2015 is 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) ; the long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value of 2014 is 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) ; the long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value of 2013 is 49.3% ( 49.3 % ) ; the short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt of 2015 is 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) ; the short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt of 2014 is 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) ; the short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt of 2013 is 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the debt to equity is the division of the total debt by the equity The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value for 2015: 50.6% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 50.6 by 5.9 which gives divide(50.6, 5.9), The final logic expression is divide(50.6, 5.9). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in a slight recession of the overall market , what percentage did the stock price of global payments change? Context: the may 31 2007 of global payments is 238.04 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p 500 is 170.85 ; the may 31 2007 of s&p information technology is 152.54 ; the may 31 2008 of global payments is 281.27 ; the may 31 2008 of s&p 500 is 159.41 ; the may 31 2008 of s&p information technology is 156.43 ; issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . ### Output: Logic: the s&p 500 is a good indicator of the overall market , therefore when that drops that means there was a slight recession that year . however , global payments did not follow the trend and rose 18.6% . this was calculated by taking the final price and subtracting it by the initial price . then take the answer and dividing by the initial price . The required values from the context for the question are: May 31, 2007 Global Payments: 238.04 May 31, 2008 Global Payments: 281.27 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 238.04 from 281.27 which gives subtract(281.27, 238.04), The final logic expression is subtract(281.27, 238.04). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of other current liabilities among the total liabilities? Context: the medical and other expenses payable of ( in thousands ) is -71063 ( 71063 ) ; the other current liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -21604 ( 21604 ) ; the other liabilities of ( in thousands ) is -82 ( 82 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of other current liabilities divided by the total liabilities . The required values from the context for the question are: Other current liabilities: 21604 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 71063 to 21604 which gives add(71063, 21604) step 2: add 82 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(82, add(71063, 21604)) step 3: divide 21604 by the expression of step 2 which gives divide(21604, add(82, add(71063, 21604))) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(21604, add(82, add(71063, 21604))), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(21604, add(82, add(71063, 21604))), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total percentage of costs that came from identifiable assets? Context: cash and cash equivalents the property and equipment of $ 7540 is 5943 ; cash and cash equivalents the identified intangible assets of $ 7540 is 188294 ; cash and cash equivalents the other assets of $ 7540 is 22278 ; cash and cash equivalents the deferred income taxes of $ 7540 is -48448 ( 48448 ) ; cash and cash equivalents the other liabilities of $ 7540 is -31250 ( 31250 ) ; cash and cash equivalents the total identifiable net assets of $ 7540 is 144357 ; cash and cash equivalents the goodwill of $ 7540 is 264844 ; cash and cash equivalents the total purchase consideration of $ 7540 is $ 409201 ; goodwill arising from the acquisition of $ 264.8 million , included in the north america segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities , an assembled workforce and potential synergies from combining our existing businesses . ### Output: Logic: to find out the identifiable assets one must not include goodwill . therefore to figure out the answer , one will take the total amount and subtract goodwill . The required values from the context for the question are: Total identifiable net assets: $ 144357 Goodwill: $ 264844 Total purchase consideration: $ 409201 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 264844 from 409201 which gives subtract(409201, 264844), The final logic expression is subtract(409201, 264844). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage increase in the operating income from 2016 to 2017 Context: 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . ### Output: Logic: the percent of the growth is the increase divided by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: Operating income for 2017: $ 21 million Operating income for 2016: $ 8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_8 from 21 which gives subtract(21, const_8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_8 which gives divide(subtract(21, const_8), const_8) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(21, const_8), const_8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(21, const_8), const_8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the three acquired businesses , that were responsible for the 27% ( 27 % ) improvement in third-party sales? Context: the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5342 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 4217 ; the third-party sales of 2013 is $ 4054 ; third-party sales for the engineered products and solutions segment improved 27% ( 27 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , largely attributable to the third-party sales ( $ 1310 ) of three acquired businesses ( see above ) , primarily aerospace- related , and higher volumes in this segment 2019s organic businesses , mostly related to the aerospace end market . ### Output: Logic: it is the total sales of these three aquired businesses divided by the total of the third-party sales.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Third-party sales for 2015: $ 5342 Third-party sales for 2014: $ 4217 Third-party sales of three acquired businesses: $ 1310 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1310 by 5342 which gives divide(1310, 5342) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1310, 5342), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1310, 5342), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated percentual increase observed in the class a common stock during the years 2009 and 2010? Context: ( in thousands ) the class a common stock of december 31 , 2010 is 66847 ; the class a common stock of december 31 , 2009 is 66511 ; ### Output: Logic: its the ratio between those two class a common stocks values during 2009 and 2010 . The required values from the context for the question are: Class A common stock for 2010: 66847 (in thousands) Class A common stock for 2009: 66511 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 66847 by 66511 which gives divide(66847, 66511) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(66847, 66511), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(66847, 66511), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(66847, 66511), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the final year of the investment , what was the highest return for the initial 100$ ? Context: the allegion plc of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2013 is 102.20 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2014 is 129.03 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2015 is 154.37 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2016 is 150.97 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2017 is 189.19 ; the s&p 500 of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2013 is 102.53 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2014 is 116.57 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2015 is 118.18 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2016 is 132.31 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2017 is 161.20 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2013 is 104.58 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2014 is 104.84 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2015 is 99.07 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2016 is 130.70 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2017 is 162.97 ; performance graph the annual changes for the period shown december 1 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading ) to december 31 , 2017 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( ""s&p 500"" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( ""s&p 400 capital goods"" ) on december 1 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested . ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of the investment's final year . The required values from the context for the question are: allegion plc of december 31 2017: 189.19 s&p 500 of december 31 2017: 161.20 s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2017: 162.97 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 189.19 which gives subtract(189.19, 100), The final logic expression is subtract(189.19, 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much square feet could the company use to build properies ? ( 1 acre = 43560 square feet ) Context: ( square feet in thousands ) the total of united states is 4809 ; the total of other countries is 2805 ; the total of total is 7614 ; applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . ### Output: Logic: the company is able to build properties on the 269 acres that are owned by the company . that is 1.1 million square feet which is calculated by multiplying the number of acres by the conversion of square feet . The required values from the context for the question are: united states (square feet in thousands): 4809 other countries (square feet in thousands): 2805 total (square feet in thousands): 7614 acres of buildable land: 269 1 acre: 43560 square feet Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 269 by 43560 which gives multiply(269, 43560) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100000 which gives divide(multiply(269, 43560), const_100000), The final logic expression is divide(multiply(269, 43560), const_100000). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2008 , what was shareholders equity ( in billions ) , as reported?\\n Context: ( in billions except ratios ) the assets of reported is $ 2175.1 ; the assets of pro forma ( a ) ( b ) is $ 2218.2 ; ( in billions except ratios ) the liabilities of reported is 2008.2 ; the liabilities of pro forma ( a ) ( b ) is 2051.3 ; ### Output: Logic: assets - liabilities = se The required values from the context for the question are: assets of reported: 2175.1 billion liabilities of reported: 2008.2 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2008.2 from 2175.1 which gives subtract(2175.1, 2008.2), The final logic expression is subtract(2175.1, 2008.2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the average cash paid for income taxes? Context: cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 10.4 million and $ 80.6 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the cash paid during these years divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: cash paid for income taxes 2016: 10.4 million cash paid for income taxes 2015: 80.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 10.4 to 80.6 which gives add(10.4, 80.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(10.4, 80.6), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(10.4, 80.6), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average decrease in the tax position from 2011 to 2013 Context: balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -3734 ( 3734 ) ; balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -2059 ( 2059 ) ; balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -5965 ( 5965 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the average decrease over the 3 years is the sum of the decrease over the 3 years divide by 3 The required values from the context for the question are: decrease in tax position 2011: -3734 decrease in tax position 2011: -2059 decrease in tax position 2011: -5965 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 3734 to 2059 which gives add(3734, 2059) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 5965 which gives add(add(3734, 2059), 5965) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(3734, 2059), 5965), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(3734, 2059), 5965), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for 2017 , what percentage of derivative receivables are rated junk? Context: rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7308 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 645 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 984 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; ### Output: Logic: junk = below bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 The required values from the context for the question are: bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent %: 18 ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent %: 2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 18 to 2 which gives add(18, 2), The final logic expression is add(18, 2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2019 , what is the highest projected benefit payment value? Context: the 2019 of u.s . is 157.2 ; the 2019 of international is 50.2 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of the projected benefit payment observed in that year . The required values from the context for the question are: 2019 of u.s.: 157.2 2019 of international: 50.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(2019, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how long is the weighted- average useful lives of other assets , as a percent of software in the engineered products and solutions segment? Context: the engineered products and solutions of software is 5 ; the engineered products and solutions of other intangible assets is 33 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the weighted- average useful lives of software ( 5 years ) divided by the weighted- average useful lives of other assets ( 33 years ) , then minus 100% . The required values from the context for the question are: engineered products and solutions of software: 5 engineered products and solutions of other intangible assets: 33 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 33 by 5 which gives divide(33, 5) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100) step 3: subtract const_100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(33, 5), const_100), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average number of shares issuable under incentive stock plans , in millions? Context: in millions the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2016 is 1.1 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2015 is 1.0 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2014 is 1.1 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all shares issuable under incentive stock plans during these years , then divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2016: 1.1 million shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2015: 1.0 million shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2014: 1.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(shares issuable under incentive stock plans, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest return for the first year of the investment? Context: the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 140 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 176 ; the hum of 12/31/2016 is $ 202 ; the hum of 12/31/2017 is $ 247 ; the hum of 12/31/2018 is $ 287 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is $ 114 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is $ 115 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2016 is $ 129 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2017 is $ 157 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2018 is $ 150 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 128 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 135 ; the peer group of 12/31/2016 is $ 137 ; the peer group of 12/31/2017 is $ 173 ; the peer group of 12/31/2018 is $ 191 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value for the first year ( 2014 ) , then turned into a percentage to represent the return . The required values from the context for the question are: hum of 12/31/2014: $140 s&p 500 of 12/31/2014: $114 peer group of 12/31/2014: $128 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 140 which gives subtract(140, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(140, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(140, 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the impact of 2018's unconditional purchase obligations on the total value? Context: 2016 the 2018 of $ 917 is 63 ; 2016 the total of $ 917 is $ 1370 ; unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . ### Output: Logic: it is 2018's value of unconditional purchase obligations divided by the total , then turned into a percentage to represent the impact . The required values from the context for the question are: 2018 unconditional purchase obligations: $917 total unconditional purchase obligations: $1370 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 63 by 1370 which gives divide(63, 1370) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(63, 1370), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(63, 1370), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2012 and 2013 , what is the increase observed in the service cost? Context: years ended december 31 the service cost of pension benefits 2013 is $ 682 ; the service cost of pension benefits 2012 is $ 555 ; the service cost of pension benefits 2011 is $ 619 ; the service cost of pension benefits 2013 is $ 102 ; the service cost of pension benefits 2012 is $ 82 ; the service cost of 2011 is $ 110 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of service cost in 2013 divided by the 2012's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: Service cost of pension benefits 2013: $682 Service cost of pension benefits 2012: $555 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 682 by 555 which gives divide(682, 555) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(682, 555), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(682, 555), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(682, 555), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net profit margin on december 312013 Context: the net income of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is 2707 ; the revenue of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is $ 40782 ; ### Output: Logic: the net profit margin is the net income over the revenues The required values from the context for the question are: Net income of December 31, 2013: 2707 (in millions) Revenue of December 31, 2013: $40782 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2707 by 40782 which gives divide(2707, 40782) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2707, 40782), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2707, 40782), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the percentage of the cash dividend paid per share concerning the total amount paid per share? Context: paymentdate the 2018 of amountper share is $ 1.90 ; the 2018 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 262 ; on november 2 , 2018 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.50 per share that was paid on january 25 , 2019 to stockholders of record on december 31 , 2018 , for an aggregate amount of $ 68 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the amount of dividend paid per share divided by the total amount paid per share , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Amount per share 2018: $1.90 Cash dividend 2018: $0.50 per share Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 0.50 by 1.90 which gives divide(0.50, 1.90) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(0.50, 1.90), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(0.50, 1.90), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2021-2025 , what is the difference between the average projected benefit payments for the u.s . and international? Context: the 2021 20132025 of u.s . is 917.9 ; the 2021 20132025 of international is 332.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the division of the accumulated value for the 2021-2025 period in the u.s . and international by 5 ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2021-2025 U.S. projected benefit payments (accumulated): 917.9 2021-2025 International projected benefit payments (accumulated): 332.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 332.3 by const_5 which gives divide(332.3, const_5) step 2: divide 917.9 by const_5 which gives divide(917.9, const_5) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(917.9, const_5), divide(332.3, const_5)), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(917.9, const_5), divide(332.3, const_5)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the tax benefit as a part of the stock based compensation in 2017 Context: the stock-based compensation of 2017 is 11 ; the stock-based compensation of 2016 is 11 ; the stock-based compensation of 2015 is 11 ; ### Output: Logic: the tax benefit rate as a percent of the stock based compensation expense the division of the tax by the total expense multiplied by 100 . The required values from the context for the question are: Stock-based compensation 2017: 11 (value missing for tax benefit) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide const_4 by 11 which gives divide(const_4, 11) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(const_4, 11), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(const_4, 11), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is going to be the matured value of the $ 400.0 issued in 2013? Context: on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . ### Output: Logic: it is the original $ 400 calculated in the compound interest formula , in which 2.75% is going to be the interest and 10 is going to be the period ( 2023-2013 ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Issued value in 2013: $400.0 Interest rate: 2.75% Maturity period: 10 years (2023-2013) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 400.0 by exp(add(const_1, 2.75%), const_10) which gives multiply(400.0, exp(add(const_1, 2.75%), const_10)), The final logic expression is multiply(400.0, exp(add(const_1, 2.75%), const_10)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the average for the years 2021-2025 , what is the increase observed in the projected benefit payments for the u.s during 2020 and 2021? Context: the 2020 of u.s . is 157.4 ; the 2020 of international is 57.8 ; the 2021 20132025 of u.s . is 917.9 ; the 2021 20132025 of international is 332.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2021 projected benefit payment divided by the 2020s , which is calculated through the average formula , then turned into a percentage.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: U.S. projected benefit payment 2020: 157.4 2021-2025 U.S. projected benefit payments (accumulated): 917.9 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 917.9 by const_5 which gives divide(917.9, const_5) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 157.4 which gives divide(divide(917.9, const_5), 157.4) step 3: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(divide(917.9, const_5), 157.4), const_1) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(divide(917.9, const_5), 157.4), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(divide(917.9, const_5), 157.4), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is an employees total annual compensation? Context: employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . ### Output: Logic: the company gives their employees an annual compensation of $ 125000 . this is found by dividing $ 25000 used for stock buying by 20% . The required values from the context for the question are: Designated amount for stock purchase: $25000 Designation percentage: 20% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 25000 by 20% which gives divide(25000, 20%), The final logic expression is divide(25000, 20%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total grant datefair value , in dollars , at the beginning of the year? Context: the beginning of year of shares is 4999 ; the beginning of year of average grant datefair value per share is $ 50.33 ; ### Output: Logic: average grant datefair value per share*number of shares = total grant datefair value The required values from the context for the question are: Beginning of year shares: 4999 Beginning of year average grant date fair value per share: $50.33 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 50.33 by 4999 which gives multiply(50.33, 4999), The final logic expression is multiply(50.33, 4999). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the rate of growth or decrease from 2013 to 2014 on the amex airline index Context: the amex airline index of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2014 is 152 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2015 is 127 ; the s&p 500 of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is 114 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is 113 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the difference between the most recent and prior amount divided by the prior amount The required values from the context for the question are: Amex airline index 12/31/2013: 102 Amex airline index 12/31/2014: 152 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 102 from 152 which gives subtract(152, 102) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 102 which gives divide(subtract(152, 102), 102) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much more of a decrease cash was a result of foreign exchange in 2013 compared to 2012? Context: balance sheet data the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2013 is $ 1642.1 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2012 is $ 2590.8 ; foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , japanese yen , canadian dollar and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 6.2 in 2012 . ### Output: Logic: to get the difference between 2012 and 2013 loss of cash due to foreign exchange rates , one must subtract the loss of 2013 by the loss of 2012 to get $ 87.9 million . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities 12/31/2013: $1642.1 Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities 12/31/2012: $2590.8 Decrease due to foreign exchange 2013: $94.1 Decrease due to foreign exchange 2012: $6.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6.2 from 94.1 which gives subtract(94.1, 6.2), The final logic expression is subtract(94.1, 6.2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: about how many towers were leased or subleased in 2004? Context: as of december 31 , 2004 , 8816 of the sites on which our u.s . towers are located , or approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our u.s . portfolio , were leased , subleased or licensed , while 1796 or approximately 17% ( 17 % ) were owned in fee or through . ### Output: Logic: the total number of towers in the us are given in line 24 . to find the amount leased we multiple that by the percentage given in line 25 . The required values from the context for the question are: Number of U.S. tower sites as of December 31, 2004: 8816 Percentage leased, subleased, or licensed: 83% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 8816 by 83% which gives multiply(8816, 83%), The final logic expression is multiply(8816, 83%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the maturities as of 2008 as part of the total maturities Context: 2008 the 2008 of $ 193101 is $ 193101 ; 2008 the total maturities of $ 193101 is 3347676 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent rate is the amount divided by the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: Maturities 2008: $193101 Total maturities 2008: 3347676 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 193101 by 3347676 which gives divide(193101, 3347676) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(193101, 3347676), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(193101, 3347676), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2013 what was the net amount that was received from increasing and decreasing interest rates , including interest income? Context: as of december 31 , the 2013 of increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates is $ -26.9 ( 26.9 ) ; the 2013 of increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates is $ 27.9 ; we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the table gave the increase and decrease of interest and line 14 gives the interest income . to find the net total you need to subtract the decrease from the increase and then added the interest income . The required values from the context for the question are: Increase in interest rates: $-26.9 Decrease in interest rates: $27.9 Interest income 2013: $24.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 26.9 from 27.9 which gives subtract(27.9, 26.9) step 2: add 24.7 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(24.7, subtract(27.9, 26.9)), The final logic expression is add(24.7, subtract(27.9, 26.9)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what were mandatory contributions to our pension and opeb plans in billions in 2017? Context: contributions to our pension and opeb plans were $ 1.6 billion and $ 329 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2017 contributions include a $ 1.0 billion discretionary contribution made to our u.s . ### Output: Logic: mandatory = total minus discretionary The required values from the context for the question are: Contributions to pension and OPEB plans 2017: $1.6 billion Discretionary contribution 2017: $1.0 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_1 from 1.6 which gives subtract(1.6, const_1), The final logic expression is subtract(1.6, const_1). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the growth of the capital expenditures from 2016 to 2017 Context: our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . ### Output: Logic: the capital expenditures increased by 22.9% from 2016 to 2017 The required values from the context for the question are: Capital expenditures 2017: $11.8 billion Capital expenditures 2016: $9.6 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 9.6 from 11.8 which gives subtract(11.8, 9.6) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 9.6 which gives divide(subtract(11.8, 9.6), 9.6) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(11.8, 9.6), 9.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(11.8, 9.6), 9.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentual increase observed in the alcoainc . investment during 2013 and 2014? Context: as of december 31 , the alcoainc . of 2010 is $ 100 ; the alcoainc . of 2011 is $ 57 ; the alcoainc . of 2012 is $ 58 ; the alcoainc . of 2013 is $ 72 ; the alcoainc . of 2014 is $ 107 ; the alcoainc . of 2015 is $ 68 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the price in 2014 ( $ 107 ) divided by the price in 2013 ( $ 72 ) then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: AlcoaInc. investment 2013: $72 AlcoaInc. investment 2014: $107 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 107 by 72 which gives divide(107, 72) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(107, 72), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(107, 72), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(107, 72), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2017 and 2018 , what is the percentual increase observed in capital expenditures used for continuing operations? Context: years ended december 31 the capital expenditures used for continuing operations of 2018 is -240 ( 240 ) ; the capital expenditures used for continuing operations of 2017 is -183 ( 183 ) ; the capital expenditures used for continuing operations of 2016 is -156 ( 156 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2018's capital expenditures value divided by the 2017's one , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Capital expenditures for continuing operations 2018: -240 Capital expenditures for continuing operations 2017: -183 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 240 by 183 which gives divide(240, 183) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(240, 183), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(240, 183), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(240, 183), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the current ratio for 2008? Context: ( in millions ) the current assets of 2008 is $ 164 ; ( in millions ) the current liabilities of 2008 is 62 ; ### Output: Logic: for this question you need to know the current ratio formula which is ff08current assets / current liabilities ) The required values from the context for the question are: Current assets 2008: $164 million Current liabilities 2008: $62 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 164 by 62 which gives divide(164, 62), The final logic expression is divide(164, 62). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total amount of dollars received from aerospace end market sales in 2015? Context: the third-party sales of 2016 is $ 5728 ; the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5342 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 4217 ; engineered products and solutions . more than 75% ( 75 % ) of the third-party sales in this segment are from the aerospace end market . ### Output: Logic: it is the total third-party sales multiplied by its percentage of aerospace end market sales . The required values from the context for the question are: Third-party sales 2015: $5342 Percentage of aerospace end market sales: 75% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 5342 by 75% which gives multiply(5342, 75%), The final logic expression is multiply(5342, 75%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the capitalized interest during 2015 and 2016? Context: the less : capitalized interest of 2017 is 19.0 ; the less : capitalized interest of 2016 is 32.7 ; the less : capitalized interest of 2015 is 49.1 ; interest expense . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual variation observed during these years , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value ( 2015 ) of the final one ( 2016 ) then dividing by the initial and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Capitalized interest 2015: $49.1 Capitalized interest 2016: $32.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 49.1 from 32.7 which gives subtract(32.7, 49.1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 49.1 which gives divide(subtract(32.7, 49.1), 49.1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(32.7, 49.1), 49.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(32.7, 49.1), 49.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: between 2012 and december 312014 what was the cumulative decrease in tax positions Context: balance at january 1 2012 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 21579 is -2059 ( 2059 ) ; balance at january 1 2012 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 21579 is -5965 ( 5965 ) ; balance at january 1 2012 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 21579 is -3176 ( 3176 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the cumulative decrease in tax position from 2012 to 2013 is the sum of the change from year to year The required values from the context for the question are: Decreases in tax positions 2012: -$2059 Decreases in tax positions (another year mentioned): -$5965 Decreases in tax positions (another year mentioned): -$3176 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2059 to 5965 which gives add(2059, 5965) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 3176 which gives add(add(2059, 5965), 3176), The final logic expression is add(add(2059, 5965), 3176). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total amount of land owned by the company ? ( 1 acre = 43560 square feet ) Context: ( square feet in thousands ) the total of united states is 4309 ; the total of other countries is 2732 ; the total of total is 7041 ; applied also owns a total of approximately 280 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . ### Output: Logic: the total square feet owned by the company includes the acres owned by the company . therefore you have to take the total amount of square feet owned of property and added the total amount of acres . The required values from the context for the question are: Total square feet US: 4309 Total square feet other countries: 2732 Total square feet: 7041 Total acres of buildable land: 280 acres Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 280 by 43560 which gives multiply(280, 43560) step 2: multiply 7041 by const_1000 which gives multiply(7041, const_1000) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(multiply(280, 43560), multiply(7041, const_1000)), The final logic expression is add(multiply(280, 43560), multiply(7041, const_1000)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for 2016 , what percentage of derivative receivables are rated junk? Context: rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7308 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 645 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 984 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; ### Output: Logic: junk = below bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3 The required values from the context for the question are: BB+/BA1 to B-/B3 rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral: 18% CCC+/CAA1 and below rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral: 2% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 18 to 2 which gives add(18, 2), The final logic expression is add(18, 2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much percentage has backlog increased from 2014 to 2015 Context: the total of 2015 is $ 3142 ; the total of 2014 is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of is $ 2917 ; the total of ( in millions except percentages ) is 100% ( 100 % ) ; backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . ### Output: Logic: the backlog has increased 7.7% from 2014 to 2015 , this is calculated by taking subtracting the totals from the two years and dividing the solution by 2014 backlog total . The required values from the context for the question are: Total backlog 2015: $3142 Total backlog 2014: $2917 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2917 from 3142 which gives subtract(3142, 2917) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2917 which gives divide(subtract(3142, 2917), 2917) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(3142, 2917), 2917), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(3142, 2917), 2917), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the operating income margin for 2006? Context: ( in millions ) the net sales of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ 2187.1 ; the net sales of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 1993.7 ; the net sales of change is $ 193.4 ; ( in millions ) the income from operations of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ 225.9 ; the income from operations of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 116.1 ; the income from operations of change is $ 109.8 ; ### Output: Logic: operating margin comparison point to increasing or decreasing efficiency . The required values from the context for the question are: Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006: $2187.1 Income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2006: $225.9 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 225.9 by 2187.1 which gives divide(225.9, 2187.1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(225.9, 2187.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(225.9, 2187.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase in the balance at end of the year from 2015 to 2016? Context: december 31 , the balance at end of year of 2016 is $ 1940 ; the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 1291 ; the balance at end of year of 2014 is $ 1151 ; the following table details the changes in the valuation allowance: . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual increase observed in the balance at the end of the year , which is calculated by dividing the 2016's value by the 2015's then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance at end of year 2016: $1940 Balance at end of year 2015: $1291 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1940 by 1291 which gives divide(1940, 1291) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1940, 1291), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1940, 1291), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1940, 1291), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total amount of unvested shares gifted by the company during the three year period? Context: the unvested at may 31 2013 of shares is 1096 ; the unvested at may 31 2013 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 44 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of shares is 877 ; the unvested at may 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 45 ; the unvested at may 31 2015 of shares is 924 ; the unvested at may 31 2015 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 58 ; the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2015 and 2014 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report 2013 81 . ### Output: Logic: to find out the total amount of unvested shares the company one must added up the shares given by the company over the course of the three years . The required values from the context for the question are: Unvested shares at May 31, 2013: 1096 Unvested shares at May 31, 2014: 877 Unvested shares at May 31, 2015: 924 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 1096 to 877 which gives add(1096, 877) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 924 which gives add(add(1096, 877), 924), The final logic expression is add(add(1096, 877), 924). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the weighted- average useful lives of software for the global rolled products segment and the transportation and construction solutions one? Context: segment the global rolled products of software is 6 ; the global rolled products of other intangible assets is 9 ; segment the transportation and construction solutions of software is 5 ; the transportation and construction solutions of other intangible assets is 16 ; the following table details the weighted- average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the number of years . The required values from the context for the question are: Global Rolled Products segment software useful life: 6 years Transportation and Construction Solutions segment software useful life: 5 years Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5 from 6 which gives subtract(6, 5), The final logic expression is subtract(6, 5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what are the average pension expenses for those three years? Context: the pension expense of 2015 is $ 135.6 ; the pension expense of 2014 is $ 135.9 ; the pension expense of 2013 is $ 169.7 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all pension expenses divided by three ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Pension expense 2015: $135.6 Pension expense 2014: $135.9 Pension expense 2013: $169.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(pension expense, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the return on assets as a percent of the account balance at december 31 , 2015 Context: the actual return on assets of level 3 is 12 ; the balance as of december 31 2015 of level 3 is $ 136 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent of the return on assets as part of the year end balance is the division of the return on assets by the end balance multiplied by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: Actual return on assets of level 3: 12 Balance as of December 31, 2015 of level 3: $136 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 12 by 136 which gives divide(12, 136) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 136), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(12, 136), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of the future lease payments is has to be paid in 2009? Context: the 2009 of operating leases is $ 22883 ; future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases . the total future minimum lease payments of operating leases is $ 67446 ; ### Output: Logic: to figure out the percentage paid in 2009 , one must take the amount to be paid in 2009 and divide by the total amount to be paid . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating leases for 2009: $22883 Total future minimum lease payments for operating leases: $67446 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 22883 by 67446 which gives divide(22883, 67446) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(22883, 67446), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(22883, 67446), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the annualized return for the investment in the allegion plc during 2013-2017? Context: the s&p 500 of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2013 is 102.53 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2014 is 116.57 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2015 is 118.18 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2016 is 132.31 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2017 is 161.20 ; performance graph the annual changes for the period shown december 1 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading ) to december 31 , 2017 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( ""s&p 500"" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( ""s&p 400 capital goods"" ) on december 1 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested . the allegion plc of december 1 2013 is 100.00 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2013 is 102.20 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2014 is 129.03 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2015 is 154.37 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2016 is 150.97 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2017 is 189.19 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the compound interest formula , in which the period is 4 years to transform the accumulated interest into an annual return.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Allegion plc value on December 1, 2013: 100.00 Allegion plc value on December 31, 2017: 189.19 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1 from exp(subtract(189.19, 100), subtract(divide(1, const_4), 1)) which gives subtract(exp(subtract(189.19, 100), subtract(divide(1, const_4), 1)), 1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(exp(subtract(189.19, 100), subtract(divide(1, const_4), 1)), 1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(exp(subtract(189.19, 100), subtract(divide(1, const_4), 1)), 1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentual return for s&p 500 in the first year? Context: the s&p 500 of 2006 is 115.80 ; the s&p 500 of 2007 is 122.16 ; the s&p 500 of 2008 is 76.96 ; the s&p 500 of 2009 is 97.33 ; the s&p 500 of 2010 is 111.99 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . ### Output: Logic: its the percentage of the difference between the initial $ 100 and the final $ 115 The required values from the context for the question are: S&P 500 value in 2006: 115.80 S&P 500 value in 2007: 122.16 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 115.80 which gives subtract(115.80, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(115.80, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(115.80, 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the performance shares granted as a percent of the total number of granted shares in 2010? Context: the granted of number of shares is 134245 ; the granted of weighted average grant date fair value is 275 ; the company granted 1020 performance shares . ### Output: Logic: its the number of granted performance shares divided by the total amount of granted shares in the year 2010 . The required values from the context for the question are: Number of granted shares: 134245 Performance shares granted: 1020 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1020 by 134245 which gives divide(1020, 134245) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1020, 134245), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1020, 134245), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the rate of growth or decrease from 2014 to 2015 on the american airlines group inc . Context: the american airlines group inc . of 12/9/2013 is $ 100 ; the american airlines group inc . of 12/31/2013 is $ 103 ; the american airlines group inc . of 12/31/2014 is $ 219 ; the american airlines group inc . of 12/31/2015 is $ 175 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the difference between the most recent and prior amount divided by the prior amount The required values from the context for the question are: American Airlines Group Inc. value on 12/31/2014: $219 American Airlines Group Inc. value on 12/31/2015: $175 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 219 from 175 which gives subtract(175, 219) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 219 which gives divide(subtract(175, 219), 219) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(175, 219), 219), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(175, 219), 219), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent of the growth in the revenues from 2007 to 2008 Context: the revenue of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is $ 9362.2 ; the revenue of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is $ 9244.9 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent growth of the revenue is the difference between the 2 divide by the oldest amount The required values from the context for the question are: Revenue for year ended December 31, 2008: $9362.2 Revenue for year ended December 31, 2007: $9244.9 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 9244.9 from 9362.2 which gives subtract(9362.2, 9244.9) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 9244.9 which gives divide(subtract(9362.2, 9244.9), 9244.9) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(9362.2, 9244.9), 9244.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(9362.2, 9244.9), 9244.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: \\nas of december 31 , 2008 , what was the percent of the proceeds form the issuance of the tax exempt and other tax exempt financing as part of the restricted cash\\n Context: the number of shares issued will be determined as the par value of the debentures divided by the average trading stock price over the preceding five-day period . as of december 31 , 2008 , we had $ 281.9 million of restricted cash , of which $ 133.5 million was proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings and will be used to fund capital expenditures under the terms of the agreements . ### Output: Logic: the percent is the difference divide by the total amount of the restricted cash The required values from the context for the question are: Restricted cash as of December 31, 2008: $281.9 million Proceeds from issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other financings: $133.5 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 133.5 by 281.9 which gives divide(133.5, 281.9) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(133.5, 281.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(133.5, 281.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in 2016 , what is the percentage of the potential of tax benefits that may have an earnings impact? Context: the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2016 , was $ 36 million , of which $ 2 million may potentially have an earnings impact . ### Output: Logic: it is the amount of cash related to tax benefits that may have an earnings impact divided by the total unrecognized tax benefits . The required values from the context for the question are: Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016: $36 million Potential earnings impact: $2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2 by 36 which gives divide(2, 36) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2, 36), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2, 36), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage gained by investing $ 100 into global payments in comparison to the technology index? Context: the may 31 2012 of globalpayments is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2012 of s&p500 index is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2012 of s&pinformationtechnology index is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2017 of globalpayments is 474.52 ; the december 31 2017 of s&p500 index is 229.61 ; the december 31 2017 of s&pinformationtechnology index is 269.45 ; global payments 500 index information technology . s&p 500 s&p information technology 12/16 12/17 comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2012 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . ### Output: Logic: to find the comparison of gains between the two stocks one must find the percentage gain for each individual stock . then one must subtract these two percentage gains from each other . The required values from the context for the question are: GlobalPayments value on May 31, 2012: $100.00 GlobalPayments value on December 31, 2017: $474.52 S&P Information Technology index on May 31, 2012: $100.00 S&P Information Technology index on December 31, 2017: $269.45 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 269.45 which gives subtract(269.45, 100) step 2: subtract 100 from 474.52 which gives subtract(474.52, 100) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(474.52, 100), subtract(269.45, 100)), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(474.52, 100), subtract(269.45, 100)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as part of the total fleet what is the approximate number of vehicles converted to cng Context: the total of approximate number of vehicles is 16000 ; the total of approximate average age is 7.7 ; each of our field groups and all of our areas provide collection , transfer , recycling and landfill services . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas . ### Output: Logic: the approximate number of vehicles the total number of vehicles multiply by vehicle coversiion percent The required values from the context for the question are: Total number of vehicles: 16000 Percentage of fleet operating on natural gas: 20% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 16000 by 20% which gives multiply(16000, 20%), The final logic expression is multiply(16000, 20%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total goodwill of arconic , in dollars? Context: more than 70% ( 70 % ) of arconic 2019s total goodwill is allocated to two reporting units as follows : arconic fastening systems and rings ( afsr ) ( $ 2200 ) and arconic power and propulsion ( app ) ( $ 1647 ) businesses , both of which are included in the engineered products and solutions segment . ### Output: Logic: the total 100% of arconic's goodwill is calculated based on the facts that the sum of arconic fastening systems and rings ( $ 2200 ) and arconic power and propulsion ( $ 1647 ) totalizes 70% of the total . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill allocated to Arconic Fastening Systems and Rings (AFSR): $2200 Goodwill allocated to Arconic Power and Propulsion (APP): $1647 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 2200 to 1647 which gives add(2200, 1647) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(add(2200, 1647), const_100) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 70 which gives divide(multiply(add(2200, 1647), const_100), 70), The final logic expression is divide(multiply(add(2200, 1647), const_100), 70). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the principal payments scheduled after 2011 to the total amount Context: the thereafter ( 1 ) of total ( in $ millions ) is 1590 ; the total of total ( in $ millions ) is 3498 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the amount divided total The required values from the context for the question are: Principal payments scheduled after 2011: $1590 million Total amount: $3498 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1590 by 3498 which gives divide(1590, 3498) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1590, 3498), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1590, 3498), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much did net sales grow in a percentage from 2016 to 2018? Context: ( in millions ) the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2018 is $ 16285.1 ; the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2017 is $ 14859.7 ; the net sales of year ended september 30 , 2016 is $ 14171.8 ; in fiscal 2018 , we continued to pursue our strategy of offering differentiated paper and packaging solutions that help our customers win . we successfully executed this strategy in fiscal 2018 in a rapidly changing cost and price environment . net sales of $ 16285.1 million for fiscal 2018 increased $ 1425.4 million , or 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) , compared to fiscal 2017 . ### Output: Logic: to figure out how much net sales grew from 2016 to 2018 one must subtract 2018 sales by 2016 and the divide the answer by 2016 sales . The required values from the context for the question are: Net sales for year ended September 30, 2016: $14171.8 million Net sales for year ended September 30, 2018: $16285.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 14171.8 from 16285.1 which gives subtract(16285.1, 14171.8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 14171.8 which gives divide(subtract(16285.1, 14171.8), 14171.8) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(16285.1, 14171.8), 14171.8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(16285.1, 14171.8), 14171.8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of electrical/electronic architecture sites among all sites? Context: the electrical/electronic architecture of north america is 30 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of europemiddle east& africa is 32 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of asia pacific is 25 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of south america is 5 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of total is 92 ; the total of north america is 37 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 49 ; the total of asia pacific is 33 ; the total of south america is 7 ; the total of total is 126 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of electrical/electronic architecture sites divided by all sites , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Electrical/Electronic Architecture sites in North America: 30 Electrical/Electronic Architecture sites in Europe Middle East & Africa: 32 Electrical/Electronic Architecture sites in Asia Pacific: 25 Electrical/Electronic Architecture sites in South America: 5 Total Electrical/Electronic Architecture sites: 92 Total sites in North America: 37 Total sites in Europe Middle East & Africa: 49 Total sites in Asia Pacific: 33 Total sites in South America: 7 Total of all sites: 126 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 92 by 126 which gives divide(92, 126) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(92, 126), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(92, 126), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of the leases was paid off in 2016? Context: fiscal years the 2016 of operating leases is $ 21780 ; fiscal years the total of operating leases is $ 59488 ; notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 31 , operating fiscal years leases . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage that was paid off in the first year one must divide the payment the first year by the total amount . this gives you the percentage that was paid off that year . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating leases for 2016: $21780 Total operating leases: $59488 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 21780 by 59488 which gives divide(21780, 59488) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(21780, 59488), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(21780, 59488), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage did ne inventories at lifo increase over the year? Context: the inventories at lifo net of december 312011 is $ 2043158 ; the inventories at lifo net of january 12011 is $ 1863870 ; advance auto parts , inc . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase in net inventories for lifo , one must subtract the end of the year by the begining of the year , then dvidie the answer by the beginning of the year . The required values from the context for the question are: Inventories at LIFO net as of December 31, 2011: $2043158 Inventories at LIFO net as of January 1, 2011: $1863870 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1863870 from 2043158 which gives subtract(2043158, 1863870) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1863870 which gives divide(subtract(2043158, 1863870), 1863870) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2043158, 1863870), 1863870), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2043158, 1863870), 1863870), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2006 , what is the percentage of working capital among the total accounts receivable? Context: october 31 2006 the $ 122.6 of october 31 2005 is $ 100.2 ; the $ 122.6 of dollar change is $ 22.4 ; the $ 122.6 of % ( % ) change is 22% ( 22 % ) ; as of october 31 , 2006 , our working capital was $ 23.4 million , compared to $ 130.6 million as of october 31 , 2005 . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the working capital divided by the total accounts receivable , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Working capital as of October 31, 2006: $23.4 million Total accounts receivable as of October 31, 2005: $100.2 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 23.4 by 122.6 which gives divide(23.4, 122.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(23.4, 122.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(23.4, 122.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average value for settlements , in millions? Context: in millions the settlements of 2018 is 2 ; the settlements of 2017 is 6 ; the settlements of 2016 is 19 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Settlements in 2018: 2 million Settlements in 2017: 6 million Settlements in 2016: 19 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(settlements, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest return for the second year of the investment? Context: company index the aptiv plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 100.00 ; the aptiv plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2014 is $ 122.75 ; the aptiv plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2015 is $ 146.49 ; the aptiv plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2016 is $ 117.11 ; the aptiv plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2017 is $ 178.46 ; the aptiv plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2018 is $ 130.80 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2014 is 113.69 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2015 is 115.26 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2016 is 129.05 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2017 is 157.22 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2018 is 150.33 ; company index the automotive peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 100.00 ; the automotive peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2014 is 107.96 ; the automotive peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2015 is 108.05 ; the automotive peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2016 is 107.72 ; the automotive peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2017 is 134.04 ; the automotive peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2018 is 106.89 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value turned into a percentage to represent the return . The required values from the context for the question are: Aptiv PLC on December 31, 2014: $122.75 Aptiv PLC on December 31, 2015: $146.49 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 146.49 which gives subtract(146.49, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(146.49, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(146.49, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: from 2009 to 2012 , what percentage return did advance auto parts beat the overall market? Context: company/index the advance auto parts of january 3 2009 is $ 100.00 ; the advance auto parts of january 2 2010 is $ 119.28 ; the advance auto parts of january 1 2011 is $ 195.80 ; the advance auto parts of december 31 2011 is $ 206.86 ; the advance auto parts of december 29 2012 is $ 213.14 ; the advance auto parts of december 28 2013 is $ 327.63 ; company/index the s&p 500 index of january 3 2009 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 index of january 2 2010 is 119.67 ; the s&p 500 index of january 1 2011 is 134.97 ; the s&p 500 index of december 31 2011 is 134.96 ; the s&p 500 index of december 29 2012 is 150.51 ; the s&p 500 index of december 28 2013 is 197.62 ; comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 . ### Output: Logic: to find the return for both stocks one would calculate the amount the company changed from 2009 to 2012 in a percentage . then take the answers for both the companies and subtract them from each other . The required values from the context for the question are: Advance Auto Parts on January 3, 2009: $100.00 Advance Auto Parts on December 29, 2012: $213.14 S&P 500 Index on January 3, 2009: 100.00 S&P 500 Index on December 29, 2012: 150.51 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 150.51 which gives subtract(150.51, const_100) step 2: subtract const_100 from 213.14 which gives subtract(213.14, const_100) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(213.14, const_100), subtract(150.51, const_100)), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(213.14, const_100), subtract(150.51, const_100)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average share price that the shares were repurchased in 2011? Context: unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 29 , 2011 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 125.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 4278.5 million under this program . ### Output: Logic: to find the average price that the company repurchase it shares at one must divide the amount paid by the number of shares bought . The required values from the context for the question are: Shares repurchased: 125.0 million Amount spent on repurchases: $4278.5 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4278.5 by 125.0 which gives divide(4278.5, 125.0), The final logic expression is divide(4278.5, 125.0). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of cash paid among the total purchase price? Context: the cash paid of ( in thousands ) is $ 9076 ; the total purchase price of ( in thousands ) is $ 11453 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of cash paid divided by the total purchase price , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash paid: $9076 (in thousands) Total purchase price: $11453 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 9076 by 11453 which gives divide(9076, 11453) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(9076, 11453), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(9076, 11453), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of lease payments will be paid after 2014? Context: the thereafter of amount is 7288 ; the total of amount is $ 9282 ; it is expected that this process will be complete by february 2009 . ### Output: Logic: to find this answer one must divide the amount of lease payments after 2014 by the total amount of lease payments . The required values from the context for the question are: Lease payments after 2014: 7288 Total lease payments: $9282 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 7288 by 9282 which gives divide(7288, 9282) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(7288, 9282), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(7288, 9282), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest return for the last year of the investment? Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2014 is $ 350.82 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2015 is $ 418.67 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2014 is 175.99 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2015 is 178.43 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.62 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 109.96 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.26 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2014 is 176.25 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2015 is 171.91 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Delphi Automotive PLC on December 31, 2015: $418.67 S&P 500 on December 31, 2015: 178.43 Automotive Supplier Peer Group on December 31, 2015: 171.91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 171.91 which gives subtract(171.91, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(171.91, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(171.91, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the value of operating expenses and other costs concerning the activities , in 2009? Context: in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 8890 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 7690 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 5245 ; in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 761 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 390 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 374 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of sales ( operating income ) subtracted by the value of operating profit . The required values from the context for the question are: Sales in 2009: $8890 (in millions) Operating profit in 2009: 761 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 761 from 8890 which gives subtract(8890, 761), The final logic expression is subtract(8890, 761). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of europemiddle east& africa's sites concerning all electrical/electronic architecture sites? Context: the electrical/electronic architecture of north america is 29 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of europemiddle east& africa is 23 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of asia pacific is 20 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of south america is 7 ; the electrical/electronic architecture of total is 79 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of sites in europemiddle east& africa divided by the total sites of electrical/electronic architecture , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Electrical/Electronic Architecture of EuropeMiddle East& Africa: 23 Total Electrical/Electronic Architecture sites: 79 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 23 by 79 which gives divide(23, 79) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(23, 79), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(23, 79), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total reduction to cost of sales from 2011 to 2013? Context: the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 5572 and $ 24087 in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 , respectively . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . in fiscal 2011 , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . ### Output: Logic: to find the reduction to cost of sales one must add the total reduction to cost of sales for the 3 years and then subtract the increase in cost of sales for the 3 year period . The required values from the context for the question are: Reduction to cost of sales in 2013: $5572 Reduction to cost of sales in 2012: $24087 Increase to cost of sales in 2011: $24708 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 24087 to 5572 which gives add(24087, 5572) step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from 24708 which gives subtract(24708, add(24087, 5572)), The final logic expression is subtract(24708, add(24087, 5572)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage did the balance increase from 2007 to 2009? Context: balance november 3 2007 the balance october 31 2009 of $ 9889 is $ 18161 ; the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase one must subtract the two year's balances and then divide the answer by the balance for 2007 . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance on November 3, 2007: (Value not provided in the short context) Balance on October 31, 2009: $18161 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 9889 from 18161 which gives subtract(18161, 9889) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 9889 which gives divide(subtract(18161, 9889), 9889) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(18161, 9889), 9889), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(18161, 9889), 9889), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: from 2014 to 2016 , what was the total amount of money they can deduct from their future income tax due to amortization? Context: interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2016 was $ 276.9 million which included $ 34.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 27.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 221.9 million which included $ 36.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 12.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 151.8 million which included $ 32.3 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and $ 15.4 million of expenses related to financing transactions in connection with the acquisition of prestige . ### Output: Logic: to find the total amount of money they can deduct from future income tax due to amortization , one must added up the amount of amortization from the years of 201420152016 The required values from the context for the question are: 2016: $34.7 million (amortization of deferred financing fees) 2015: $36.7 million (amortization of deferred financing fees) 2014: $32.3 million (amortization of deferred financing fees) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 34.7 to 36.7 which gives add(34.7, 36.7) step 2: add 32.3 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(32.3, add(34.7, 36.7)), The final logic expression is add(32.3, add(34.7, 36.7)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of north america's signal and power solutions sites among all signal and power solutions sites? Context: the signal and power solutions of north america is 45 ; the signal and power solutions of europemiddle east& africa is 33 ; the signal and power solutions of asia pacific is 33 ; the signal and power solutions of south america is 5 ; the signal and power solutions of total is 116 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of sites in north america divided by the total sites , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: North America: 45 (signal and power solutions) Total: 116 (signal and power solutions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 45 by 116 which gives divide(45, 116) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(45, 116), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(45, 116), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of existing technology among the total intangible assets? Context: the company acquired $ 6.0 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 3.9 million in existing technology , $ 1.9 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in trade names to be amortized over five years . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the existing technology divided by the total value of intangible assets , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Existing technology: $3.9 million Total intangible assets: $6.0 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 3.9 by 6.0 which gives divide(3.9, 6.0) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(3.9, 6.0), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(3.9, 6.0), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much did the inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs increase in the year of 2016? Context: inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory as of december 31 , 2016 and january 2 , 2016 , were $ 395240 and $ 359829 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: to find how much the company increased its inventory overhead costs and warehousing costs one must subtract the costs at the start of the year by the amount at the end of the year . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016: $395,240 (inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs) 2016 start (January 2): $359,829 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 359829 from 395240 which gives subtract(395240, 359829) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 359829 which gives divide(subtract(395240, 359829), 359829), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(395240, 359829), 359829). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of long-term debt was paid off from 2010 to 2011? Context: the fair value of the long-term debt as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 was $ 413.4 million and $ 416.3 million , respectively . the following methods and assumptions were used by the company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments : cash equivalents and short-term investments 2014 these investments are adjusted to fair value based on quoted market prices or are determined using a yield curve model based on current market rates . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of long term debt paid off one must subtract the long term debt over the years then divide by the long-term debt in 2010 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2011: $413.4 million (long-term debt) 2010: $416.3 million (long-term debt) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 413.4 from 416.3 which gives subtract(416.3, 413.4) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 416.3 which gives divide(subtract(416.3, 413.4), 416.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(416.3, 413.4), 416.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(416.3, 413.4), 416.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average industry segment operating profits , in millions? Context: in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2009 is $ 2360 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2008 is $ 1393 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 1897 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: 2009: $2360 million (industry segment operating profits) 2008: $1393 million 2007: $1897 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(industry segment operating profits, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest return rate for the initial year of the investment? Context: the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/12 is $ 100.00 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/13 is $ 113.52 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/14 is $ 116.07 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/15 is $ 119.12 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/16 is $ 142.10 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/17 is $ 176.08 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/12 is 100.00 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/13 is 132.39 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/14 is 150.51 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/15 is 152.59 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/16 is 170.84 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/17 is 208.14 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/12 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/13 is 133.76 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/14 is 187.65 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/15 is 162.30 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/16 is 193.79 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/17 is 248.92 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/12 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/13 is 141.60 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/14 is 171.91 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/15 is 132.47 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/16 is 171.17 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/17 is 218.34 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 12/12: $100.00 (expeditors international of washington inc.) 12/13: $113.52 12/14: $116.07 12/15: $119.12 12/16: $142.10 12/17: $176.08 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 113.52 which gives subtract(113.52, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(113.52, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(113.52, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the balance between 2005 and 2006 , in thousands? Context: the balance at october 31 2005 of ( in thousands ) is $ 728979 ; the balance at october 31 2006 of ( in thousands ) is $ 735643 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: 2005: $728,979 (in thousands) 2006: $735,643 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 728979 from 735643 which gives subtract(735643, 728979), The final logic expression is subtract(735643, 728979). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage increase in stores from 2007 to 2011? Context: the ending stores of 2011 is 3460 ; the ending stores of 2010 is 3369 ; the ending stores of 2009 is 3264 ; the ending stores of 2008 is 3243 ; the ending stores of 2007 is 3153 ; we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. . the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years : beginning stores new stores ( 1 ) stores closed ending stores ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . ### Output: Logic: one can figure out the increase in percentage of stores by subtracting the end store total from 2011 by the store total of 2007 . then taking that answer and dividing it by the store total for 2007 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2011: 3460 stores 2007: 3153 stores Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3153 from 3460 which gives subtract(3460, 3153) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3153 which gives divide(subtract(3460, 3153), 3153) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(3460, 3153), 3153), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(3460, 3153), 3153), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: for the years of 2011 and 2010 , what percentage of the gain on sale went towards income tax? Context: the gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes of 2012 is $ 2014 ; the gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes of 2011 is $ 10000 ; the gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes of 2010 is $ 1316 ; the provision for income taxes of 2012 is 2014 ; the provision for income taxes of 2011 is 3500 ; the provision for income taxes of 2010 is 457 ; the gain on sale of discontinued operations net of tax of 2012 is $ 2014 ; the gain on sale of discontinued operations net of tax of 2011 is $ 6500 ; the gain on sale of discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ 859 ; the following amounts related to the cpu voltage regulation and pc thermal monitoring and baseband chipset businesses have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations. . ### Output: Logic: to find the income tax one must divide the amount taken from the income tax by the initial amount before income tax . The required values from the context for the question are: gain on sale before taxes 2011: $10000 gain on sale before taxes 2010: $1316 provision for income taxes 2011: 3500 provision for income taxes 2010: 457 gain on sale net of tax 2011: $6500 gain on sale net of tax 2010: $859 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 457 by 1316 which gives divide(457, 1316), The final logic expression is divide(457, 1316). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the balance between 2004 and 2005?\\n Context: the balance at october 31 2004 of ( in thousands ) is $ 593706 ; the balance at october 31 2005 of ( in thousands ) is $ 728979 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2005 value divided by the 2004's , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: balance October 31 2004: $593706 balance October 31 2005: $728979 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 728979 by 593706 which gives divide(728979, 593706) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(728979, 593706), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(728979, 593706), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(728979, 593706), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total amount of money set aside from the market cap for restricted stock in 2014? Context: the restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014 of restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands ) is 3188 ; the restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014 of weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share is $ 43.46 ; as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . ### Output: Logic: to find out the answer one must realize when the question talks about market cap one must multiple the share price by the amount of shares . therefore in order to find the amount of money withheld one has to multiple the amount of shares withheld at the average share price . The required values from the context for the question are: restricted stock units outstanding November 1 2014: 3188 (in thousands) weighted-average grant-date fair value per share November 1 2014: $43.46 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 3188 by 43.46 which gives multiply(3188, 43.46), The final logic expression is multiply(3188, 43.46). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the value of operating expenses and other costs concerning the activities , in 2007? Context: in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 8890 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 7690 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 5245 ; in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 761 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 390 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 374 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of sales ( operating income ) subtracted by the value of operating profit . The required values from the context for the question are: sales 2007: $5245 (in millions) operating profit 2007: 374 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 374 from 5245 which gives subtract(5245, 374), The final logic expression is subtract(5245, 374). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total purchase price in cash payment for the sentinelle medical acquisition? Context: the company accounted for the sentinelle medical acquisition as a purchase of a business under asc 805 . the purchase price was comprised of an $ 84.8 million cash payment , which was net of certain adjustments , plus three contingent payments up to a maximum of an additional $ 250.0 million in cash . ### Output: Logic: in line 4 it states that the company paid 3 amounts of 250 and therefore you would multiple that amount by 3 and then add up the initial payment . The required values from the context for the question are: purchase price cash payment: $84.8 million contingent payments: up to a maximum of an additional $250.0 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 250.0 by const_3 which gives multiply(250.0, const_3) step 2: add 84.8 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(84.8, multiply(250.0, const_3)), The final logic expression is add(84.8, multiply(250.0, const_3)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the growth observed in the industrial packaging segment , during 2017 and 2018? Context: in millions the industrial packaging of 2018 is $ 1061 ; the industrial packaging of 2017 is $ 836 ; the industrial packaging of 2016 is $ 832 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase . The required values from the context for the question are: industrial packaging 2018: $1061 (in millions) industrial packaging 2017: $836 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1061 by 836 which gives divide(1061, 836) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1061, 836), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1061, 836), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1061, 836), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average annual store closure from 2007 to 2011? Context: the stores closed of 2011 is -4 ( 4 ) ; the stores closed of 2010 is -5 ( 5 ) ; the stores closed of 2009 is -54 ( 54 ) ; the stores closed of 2008 is -19 ( 19 ) ; the stores closed of 2007 is -17 ( 17 ) ; we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. . the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years : beginning stores new stores ( 1 ) stores closed ending stores ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . ### Output: Logic: to find the average amount of closure of stores , one must add all of the closed stores for the years and divide by the amount of years . The required values from the context for the question are: stores closed 2011: -4 (4) stores closed 2010: -5 (5) stores closed 2009: -54 (54) stores closed 2008: -19 (19) stores closed 2007: -17 (17) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 17 to 4 which gives add(17, 4) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(17, 4), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(17, 4), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of 2006's estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation among the total? Context: fiscal year the 2006 of ( in thousands ) is 840 ; fiscal year the total estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation of ( in thousands ) is $ 7170 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2006's value divided by the total amount , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: fiscal year 2006: 840 (in thousands) total estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation: $7170 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 840 by 7170 which gives divide(840, 7170) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(840, 7170), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(840, 7170), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of south america's sites among all sites? Context: the total of north america is 39 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 45 ; the total of asia pacific is 34 ; the total of south america is 11 ; the total of total is 129 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of south america's sites divided by all sites , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: total south america: 11 total overall: 129 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 11 by 129 which gives divide(11, 129) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(11, 129), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(11, 129), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total fair value building that cytyc had finished constructing in 2008 including the fair market value of the land? Context: during the year ended september 27 , 2008 , the company recorded an additional $ 4400 in fair market value of the building , which was completed in fiscal 2008 . this is in addition to the $ 3000 fair market value of the land and the $ 7700 fair market value related to the building constructed that cytyc had recorded as of october 22 , 2007 . ### Output: Logic: to find the total fair value of the building one must added the fair market valuation of the building and land in 2007 and add the additional fair market valuation in 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: fair market value of the building 2008 addition: $4400 fair market value of the land 2007: $3000 fair market value related to the building constructed 2007: $7700 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 3000 to 4400 which gives add(3000, 4400) step 2: add 7700 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(7700, add(3000, 4400)), The final logic expression is add(7700, add(3000, 4400)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of future minimum lease payments are projected to be paid off in 2016? Context: fiscal 2012 the fiscal 2016 of $ 1616 is 1854 ; fiscal 2012 the total of $ 1616 is $ 8290 ; future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 24 , 2011: . ### Output: Logic: to find the percent of future minimum lease payments one must divide the projected payments in 2016 by the total amount of payments The required values from the context for the question are: projected payments 2016: $1854 total payments 2012: $8290 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1854 by 8290 which gives divide(1854, 8290) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1854, 8290), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1854, 8290), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the differnece between the federal and the state net operating loss carryforward? Context: carryforward the federal net operating loss carryforward of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 57265 ; the federal net operating loss carryforward of expirationdate is 2018-2034 ; carryforward the state net operating loss carryforward of amount ( in thousands ) is 33201 ; the state net operating loss carryforward of expirationdate is 2024-2035 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: federal net operating loss carryforward: $57265 (in thousands) state net operating loss carryforward: $33201 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 33201 from 57265 which gives subtract(57265, 33201), The final logic expression is subtract(57265, 33201). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest value of reductions for tax positions of prior years? Context: in millions the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2018 is 5 ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2017 is 4 ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2016 is 33 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value . The required values from the context for the question are: reductions for tax positions of prior years 2018: 5 (in millions) reductions for tax positions of prior years 2017: 4 (in millions) reductions for tax positions of prior years 2016: 33 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(reductions for tax positions of prior years, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent did the inventories at lifo net increase from the beginning of 2011 to the end of 2012? Context: the inventories at fifo net of december 292012 is $ 2182419 ; the inventories at fifo net of december 312011 is $ 1941055 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 292012 is $ 2308609 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 312011 is $ 2043158 ; inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage change one must take the inventories at lifo net of 2012 and subtract it from the inventories at lifo net of 2011 . then take the answer and divide it by the inventories at lifo net of 2011 . The required values from the context for the question are: inventories at lifo net of december 292012: $2308609 inventories at lifo net of december 312011: $2043158 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1941055 from 2308609 which gives subtract(2308609, 1941055) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1941055 which gives divide(subtract(2308609, 1941055), 1941055) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2308609, 1941055), 1941055), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2308609, 1941055), 1941055), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what would be the balance if the company suffered the potential total tax liability of the 2006 and 2007 irs examination? Context: balance november 3 2007 the balance october 31 2009 of $ 9889 is $ 18161 ; fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . ### Output: Logic: the potential tax liability for the 2006 and 2007 irs examination would be 195 million . to find the final balance one would take the balance and subtract this number The required values from the context for the question are: balance october 31 2009: $9889 potential total tax liability: $195 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 195 from 18161 which gives subtract(18161, 195), The final logic expression is subtract(18161, 195). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the other corporate special items in addition , what is the variation observed in the other pre-tax corporate special items during 2017 and 2018 , in millions of dollars? Context: other corporate special items in addition , other pre-tax corporate special items totaling $ 30 million , $ 0 million and $ 8 million were recorded in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: other pre-tax corporate special items 2018: $30 million other pre-tax corporate special items 2017: $0 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 0 from 30 which gives subtract(30, 0), The final logic expression is subtract(30, 0). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is a rough estimate of the ratio of securities given to securities received? Context: the u.s . dollars of ( pay ) /receive is -114000 ( 114000 ) ; the euros of ( pay ) /receive is -4472 ( 4472 ) ; the singapore dollars of ( pay ) /receive is 37180 ; the canadian dollars of ( pay ) /receive is 81234 ; the malaysian ringgits of ( pay ) /receive is 85963 ; forward currency contracts: . ### Output: Logic: to find the ratio , one must add up the securities received by given . then one must divide the total securities received by the total securities given . The required values from the context for the question are: u.s . dollars of ( pay ) /receive: -114000 (114000) euros of ( pay ) /receive: -4472 (4472) singapore dollars of ( pay ) /receive: 37180 canadian dollars of ( pay ) /receive: 81234 malaysian ringgits of ( pay ) /receive: 85963 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 114000 to 4472 which gives add(114000, 4472) step 2: add 37180 to 81234 which gives add(37180, 81234) step 3: add 85963 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(85963, add(37180, 81234)) step 4: divide the expression of step 1 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(add(114000, 4472), add(85963, add(37180, 81234))), The final logic expression is divide(add(114000, 4472), add(85963, add(37180, 81234))). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average percentage that the lease expenses decreased from 2011 to 2013 Context: fiscal years the 2011 of operating leases is $ 21871 ; fiscal years the 2012 of operating leases is 12322 ; fiscal years the 2013 of operating leases is 9078 ; the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . ### Output: Logic: in order to find the average percentage decrease for this 3 year period one must find the change in percent for each year . this is calculated by subtracting the initial expense by the expense for the next year and then dividing the answer by the initial expense . then one has to find the average for the years . The required values from the context for the question are: fiscal years 2011 operating leases: $21871 fiscal years 2012 operating leases: $12322 fiscal years 2013 operating leases: $9078 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 9078 from 12322 which gives subtract(12322, 9078) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 12322 which gives divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322) step 3: subtract 12322 from 21871 which gives subtract(21871, 12322) step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by 21871 which gives divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871) step 5: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)) step 6: divide the expression of step 5 by const_2 which gives divide(add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)), const_2) step 7: multiply the expression of step 6 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)), const_2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)), const_2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual increase in the resulting change in provision for income taxes caused by errors during 2002 and 2003? Context: 2001 the $ 205 of 2002 is $ 1833 ; the $ 205 of 2003 is $ 5303 ; the $ 205 of 2004 is $ -748 ( 748 ) ; the $ 205 of 2005 is $ 1636 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the 2003 value divided by the 2002 one then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: $205 of 2002 $1833 $205 of 2003: $5303 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 5303 by 1833 which gives divide(5303, 1833) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(5303, 1833), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(5303, 1833), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(5303, 1833), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the highest and average value of operating profit? Context: in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 50 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 103 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 108 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between the maximum and average values . The required values from the context for the question are: operating profit 2009: 50 operating profit 2008: 103 operating profit 2007: 108 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract table_average(operating profit, none) from table_max(operating profit, none) which gives subtract(table_max(operating profit, none), table_average(operating profit, none)), The final logic expression is subtract(table_max(operating profit, none), table_average(operating profit, none)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage did the intrinsic value increase from 2009 to 2011? Context: the total intrinsic value of options exercised ( i.e . the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the employee to exercise the options ) during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 96.5 million , $ 29.6 million and $ 4.7 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase one must subtract the amount from the two dates . then one must take the answer and divide it by the initial number of 2009 . The required values from the context for the question are: intrinsic value 2011: $96.5 million intrinsic value 2010: $29.6 million intrinsic value 2009: $4.7 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4.7 from 96.5 which gives subtract(96.5, 4.7) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 4.7 which gives divide(subtract(96.5, 4.7), 4.7) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(96.5, 4.7), 4.7), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(96.5, 4.7), 4.7), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: if the u.s dollar would change by 5% ( 5 % ) against foreign currencies , what would the expected net earnings? Context: the u.s . dollars of ( pay ) /receive is -114000 ( 114000 ) ; a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . ### Output: Logic: if a currency change of 10% would change the net earnings by $ 0.1 million . then dividing that in half to get a change in 5% . the answer would then be $ 0.05 million . The required values from the context for the question are: 10% change in net earnings: $0.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 0.1 by const_2 which gives divide(0.1, const_2), The final logic expression is divide(0.1, const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of payments was long-term debt? Context: the long-term debt ( 1 ) of total is $ 6424582 ; the long-term debt ( 1 ) of less than1 year is $ 619373 ; the long-term debt ( 1 ) of 1-3 years is $ 1248463 ; the long-term debt ( 1 ) of 3-5 years is $ 3002931 ; the long-term debt ( 1 ) of more than5 years is $ 1553815 ; the total of total is $ 13949545 ; the total of less than1 year is $ 1954928 ; the total of 1-3 years is $ 3134258 ; the total of 3-5 years is $ 4420932 ; the total of more than5 years is $ 4439427 ; the amount excludes deferred financing fees which are included in the consolidated balance sheets as an offset to long-term debt . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of payments was long-term debt one must divide long-term debt by the total amount of payments . The required values from the context for the question are: long-term debt total: $6424582 total of total: $13949545 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 6424582 by 13949545 which gives divide(6424582, 13949545) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(6424582, 13949545), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(6424582, 13949545), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation between the federal research credit carryforward and federal net operating loss carryforward , in thousands? Context: carryforward the federal net operating loss carryforward of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 57265 ; the federal net operating loss carryforward of expirationdate is 2018-2034 ; carryforward the federal research credit carryforward of amount ( in thousands ) is 78599 ; the federal research credit carryforward of expirationdate is 2019-2036 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: federal net operating loss carryforward: $57265 federal research credit carryforward: 78599 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 57265 from 78599 which gives subtract(78599, 57265), The final logic expression is subtract(78599, 57265). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of the restricted stock was lost due to restrictions lapsed in the 2014 period? Context: the restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014 of restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands ) is 3188 ; the restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014 of weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share is $ 43.46 ; the restrictions lapsed of restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands ) is -1151 ( 1151 ) ; the restrictions lapsed of weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share is $ 39.72 ; as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage lost one must divide the total number restrictions lapsed of restricted stocks by the total number of restricted stock . The required values from the context for the question are: restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014: 3188 restrictions lapsed of restrictedstock unitsoutstanding: -1151 (1151) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1151 by 3188 which gives divide(1151, 3188) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1151, 3188), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1151, 3188), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest value of operating profit during this period? Context: in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 50 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 103 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 108 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value . The required values from the context for the question are: operating profit 2009: 50 operating profit 2008: 103 operating profit 2007: 108 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(operating profit, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2004-2005 , what is the percentual decrease observed in the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation? Context: fiscal year the 2004 of ( in thousands ) is $ 3677 ; fiscal year the 2005 of ( in thousands ) is 2403 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those values divided by the initial one , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2004 amortization: $3677 2005 amortization: $2403 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 3677 from 2403 which gives subtract(2403, 3677) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3677 which gives divide(subtract(2403, 3677), 3677) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2403, 3677), 3677), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2403, 3677), 3677), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2012? Context: millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 6823 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; millions the dividends paid of 2013 is -1333 ( 1333 ) ; the dividends paid of 2012 is -1146 ( 1146 ) ; the dividends paid of 2011 is -837 ( 837 ) ; ### Output: Logic: looking to see what kind of cash coverage the firm has to pay its dividend from its operations . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash provided by operating activities 2012: $6161 Dividends paid 2012: $1146 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1146 by 6161 which gives divide(1146, 6161) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1146, 6161), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1146, 6161), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: based on the table , how much percent did the healthcare sector outperform the overall market in this 5 year period? Context: company / index the s&p 500 index of 2010 is 100 ; the s&p 500 index of 2011 is 102 ; the s&p 500 index of 2012 is 118 ; the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 157 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 178 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 181 ; company / index the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2010 is 100 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2011 is 99 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2012 is 116 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2013 is 148 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2014 is 187 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2015 is 199 ; market performance . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage the healthcare sector outperformed the overall market fist one has to find the percentage increase for both the healthcare sector and the overall market . then take those percentages and compare them . The required values from the context for the question are: S&P 500 index 2010: 100 S&P 500 index 2015: 181 S&P 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 2010: 100 S&P 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 2015: 199 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 181 which gives subtract(181, 100) step 2: subtract 100 from 199 which gives subtract(199, 100) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(199, 100), subtract(181, 100)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(199, 100), subtract(181, 100)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(199, 100), subtract(181, 100)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average capital spending for the global cellulose fibers segment , considering the years 2016-2018? Context: in millions the global cellulose fibers of 2018 is 183 ; the global cellulose fibers of 2017 is 188 ; the global cellulose fibers of 2016 is 174 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Global cellulose fibers 2016: 174 Global cellulose fibers 2017: 188 Global cellulose fibers 2018: 183 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(global cellulose fibers, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of powertrain systems sites among all sites? Context: the powertrain systems of north america is 4 ; the powertrain systems of europemiddle east& africa is 10 ; the powertrain systems of asia pacific is 5 ; the powertrain systems of south america is 2 ; the powertrain systems of total is 21 ; the total of north america is 37 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 49 ; the total of asia pacific is 33 ; the total of south america is 7 ; the total of total is 126 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of powertrain systems sites divided by all sites , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Powertrain systems total: 21 Total sites: 126 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 21 by 126 which gives divide(21, 126) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(21, 126), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(21, 126), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much did the balance debt increase from 2018 to 2019? Context: the november 3 2018 of foreign currency translation adjustment is $ -28711 ( 28711 ) ; the november 3 2018 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available for sale securities is $ -10 ( 10 ) ; the november 3 2018 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -14355 ( 14355 ) ; the november 3 2018 of pension plans is $ -15364 ( 15364 ) ; the november 3 2018 of total is $ -58440 ( 58440 ) ; the november 2 2019 of foreign currency translation adjustment is $ -30076 ( 30076 ) ; the november 2 2019 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available for sale securities is $ 2014 ; the november 2 2019 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -118015 ( 118015 ) ; the november 2 2019 of pension plans is $ -39708 ( 39708 ) ; the november 2 2019 of total is $ -187799 ( 187799 ) ; the components of aoci at november 2 , 2019 and november 3 , 2018 consisted of the following , net of tax : foreign currency translation adjustment unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available for sale securities unrealized holding ( losses ) on derivatives pension plans total . ### Output: Logic: to find how much the balance debt increased over the period of time one has to subtract the 2019 balance by the 2018 balance . then take the answer and divide by the 2018 balance . The required values from the context for the question are: Total 2018: $-58440 Total 2019: $-187799 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 58440 from 187799 which gives subtract(187799, 58440) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 58440 which gives divide(subtract(187799, 58440), 58440) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(187799, 58440), 58440), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(187799, 58440), 58440), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what will the payment of interest be on the 2021 senior unsecure note? Context: bank national association , as trustee with respect to $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due 2021 ( incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.1 to norwegian cruise line holdings ltd . 2019s form 8-k filed on december 14 , 2016 ( file no . ### Output: Logic: to find the payment on interest one would multiple the amount by the interest rate . The required values from the context for the question are: Principal amount: $700.0 million Interest rate: 4.750% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 700.0 by 4.750% which gives multiply(700.0, 4.750%), The final logic expression is multiply(700.0, 4.750%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage did the balance increase from 2007 to 2010? Context: balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2008 of $ 9889 is 3861 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance november 1 2008 of $ 9889 is 13750 ; balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2009 of $ 9889 is 4411 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance october 31 2009 of $ 9889 is 18161 ; balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2010 of $ 9889 is 286 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance october 30 2010 of $ 9889 is $ 18447 ; the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2010. . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase from 2007 to 2010 one must take the balance for 2010 and subtract that by the balance for 2007 . then take the answer and divide it by the balance for 2007 . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance 2007: $9889 Balance 2010: $18447 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 9889 from 18447 which gives subtract(18447, 9889) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 9889 which gives divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent increase was the adjustments to state inventories of the 2016 starting inventories? Context: the inventories at fifo net of december 312016 is $ 4120030 ; the inventories at fifo net of january 22016 is $ 4009641 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 312016 is 205838 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of january 22016 is 165127 ; inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of 2016 and 2015 were as follows : december 31 , january 2 . ### Output: Logic: to find the increase in inventories one must divide the amount that is adding to the inventories by total original amount of inventories . The required values from the context for the question are: Starting inventories January 2 2016: $4009641 Adjustments to state inventories January 2 2016: 165127 Adjustments to state inventories December 31 2016: 205838 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 205838 by 4120030 which gives divide(205838, 4120030), The final logic expression is divide(205838, 4120030). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage increase of income for the fiscal years of 2008 to 2010? Context: the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal years 2010 , 2009 and 2008 include $ 1.8 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase of income for the years of 2008 to 2010 one must subtract these two years from each other and then divide the answer by the income for 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: Income 2008: $1.3 million Income 2010: $1.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1.3 from 1.8 which gives subtract(1.8, 1.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1.3 which gives divide(subtract(1.8, 1.3), 1.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1.8, 1.3), 1.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1.8, 1.3), 1.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the asia pacific , what is the percentage of the signal and power solutions segment among all segments? Context: the signal and power solutions of north america is 45 ; the signal and power solutions of europemiddle east& africa is 33 ; the signal and power solutions of asia pacific is 33 ; the signal and power solutions of south america is 5 ; the signal and power solutions of total is 116 ; the total of north america is 47 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 38 ; the total of asia pacific is 36 ; the total of south america is 5 ; the total of total is 126 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of sites related to signal and power solutions divided by the total number of sites , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Signal and power solutions of Asia Pacific: 33 Total of Asia Pacific: 36 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 33 by 36 which gives divide(33, 36) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(33, 36), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(33, 36), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in december 2016 the nclc issued senior unsecured notes due december 2021 , what is the payment they will receive on december 2021? Context: in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par . ### Output: Logic: to find the total amount the company will be paid , one has to multiple the initial loan by the amount of interest and then add the interest to the initial amount . The required values from the context for the question are: Aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes: $700.0 million Interest rate: 4.750% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 700.0 by 4.750% which gives multiply(700.0, 4.750%) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 700.0 which gives add(multiply(700.0, 4.750%), 700.0), The final logic expression is add(multiply(700.0, 4.750%), 700.0). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage has renting lease expenses increased from 2017 to 2019? Context: total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . ### Output: Logic: to find the answer one must look at line 4 where it states the lease expenses for the years of 20172018 , and 2019 . then one must take the 2019 and 2017 lease expenses and subtract them from each other . then divide the answer by the 2017 lease expenses . The required values from the context for the question are: Rental expense in fiscal 2019: $92.3 million Rental expense in fiscal 2017: $58.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 58.8 from 92.3 which gives subtract(92.3, 58.8) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 58.8 which gives divide(subtract(92.3, 58.8), 58.8) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(92.3, 58.8), 58.8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(92.3, 58.8), 58.8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much money can be deducted from income taxes from the 2014 to 2016 , not counting goodwill and intangible assets? Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: depreciation expenses are able to be deducted from future income taxes therefore based on line 2 the total amount of depreciated expenses was $ 378.7 million . this was found by adding up the total depreciation expenses for 20142015 , and 2016 The required values from the context for the question are: Depreciation expense in fiscal 2016: $134.5 million Depreciation expense in fiscal 2015: $130.1 million Depreciation expense in fiscal 2014: $114.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 134.5 to 114.1 which gives add(134.5, 114.1) step 2: add 130.1 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(130.1, add(134.5, 114.1)), The final logic expression is add(130.1, add(134.5, 114.1)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total expense related to contribution plans from 2008 to 2010 Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . ### Output: Logic: the way to find the answer is to take the total expense related contributions for both the us and non-us and add them together . then take all 3 years totals and add them together . The required values from the context for the question are: Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2010: $20.5 million Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2009: $21.5 million Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2008: $22.6 million Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2010: $11.7 million Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2009: $10.9 million Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2008: $13.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 21.5 to 10.9 which gives add(21.5, 10.9) step 2: add 22.6 to 13.9 which gives add(22.6, 13.9) step 3: add 20.5 to 11.7 which gives add(20.5, 11.7) step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7)) step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(21.5, 10.9), add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))), The final logic expression is add(add(21.5, 10.9), add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much did the cost of sales change over from 2010 to 2012 Context: the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . ### Output: Logic: to find the answer one must added the two years the cost of sales decreased then take the year that the cost of sales increased and subtract that by the previous answer . The required values from the context for the question are: Reduction to cost of sales in fiscal 2012: $24087 Reduction to cost of sales in fiscal 2010: $29554 Increase to cost of sales in fiscal 2011: $24708 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 24087 to 29554 which gives add(24087, 29554) step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from 24708 which gives subtract(24708, add(24087, 29554)), The final logic expression is subtract(24708, add(24087, 29554)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of customer relationships among the total intangible assets? Context: the company acquired $ 2.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 1.9 million in existing technology , $ 0.4 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in non-compete agreements to be amortized over five to seven years . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the customer relationships divided by the total value of intangible assets , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Intangible assets value: $2.5 million Customer relationships value: $0.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 0.4 by 2.5 which gives divide(0.4, 2.5) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(0.4, 2.5), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(0.4, 2.5), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest return for the first year of the investment? Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.27 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 110.41 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.46 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value , turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Delphi Automotive PLC index on December 31, 2011: $100.98 S&P 500 index on December 31, 2011: $100.80 Automotive Supplier Peer Group index on December 31, 2011: $89.27 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 110.41 which gives subtract(110.41, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(110.41, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(110.41, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of the total purchase price was contingent consideration? Context: cash the contingent consideration of $ 84751 is 29500 ; cash the total purchase price of $ 84751 is $ 114251 ; the purchase price was as follows: . source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of the total purchase price was contingent consideration , one must divide the contingent consideration by the total purchase price . The required values from the context for the question are: Contingent consideration: $84751 Total purchase price: $114251 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 29500 by 114251 which gives divide(29500, 114251) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(29500, 114251), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(29500, 114251), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the balance between 2012 and 2013?\\n Context: the balance at october 31 2012 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1976987 ; the balance at october 31 2013 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1975971 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation divided by the initial value , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance at October 31, 2012: $1976987 (in thousands) Balance at October 31, 2013: $1975971 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1976987 from 1975971 which gives subtract(1975971, 1976987) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1976987 which gives divide(subtract(1975971, 1976987), 1976987) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1975971, 1976987), 1976987), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1975971, 1976987), 1976987), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2005-2006 , what is the variation observed in the working capital , in millions? Context: as of october 31 , 2006 , our working capital was $ 23.4 million , compared to $ 130.6 million as of october 31 , 2005 . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Working capital as of October 31, 2006: $23.4 million Working capital as of October 31, 2005: $130.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 23.4 from 130.6 which gives subtract(130.6, 23.4), The final logic expression is subtract(130.6, 23.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage did the allowance for doubtful accounts receivables increase from the beginning of 2015 to the end of 2016? Context: allowance for doubtful accounts receivable : the january 3 2015 of balance atbeginningof period is $ 13295 ; the january 3 2015 of charges toexpenses is $ 17182 ; the january 3 2015 of deductions is $ -14325 ( 14325 ) ; the january 3 2015 of is -1 ( 1 ) ; the january 3 2015 of balance atend ofperiod is $ 16152 ; allowance for doubtful accounts receivable : the december 31 2016 of balance atbeginningof period is 25758 ; the december 31 2016 of charges toexpenses is 24597 ; the december 31 2016 of deductions is -21191 ( 21191 ) ; the december 31 2016 of is -1 ( 1 ) ; the december 31 2016 of balance atend ofperiod is 29164 ; note : other valuation and qualifying accounts have not been reported in this schedule because they are either not applicable or because the information has been included elsewhere in this report. . ### Output: Logic: to find the increase in allowance for doubtful accounts receivables one must subtract the begging of the year by the end of the year . then divide the answer by the beginning of the year . The required values from the context for the question are: balance atbeginningof period (January 3, 2015): $13295 balance atend ofperiod (January 3, 2015): $16152 balance atbeginningof period (December 31, 2016): $25758 balance atend ofperiod (December 31, 2016): $29164 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 13295 from 29164 which gives subtract(29164, 13295) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 13295 which gives divide(subtract(29164, 13295), 13295) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(29164, 13295), 13295), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(29164, 13295), 13295), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the resulting change in provision for income taxes caused by errors during 2002 and 2001? Context: 2001 the $ 205 of 2002 is $ 1833 ; the $ 205 of 2003 is $ 5303 ; the $ 205 of 2004 is $ -748 ( 748 ) ; the $ 205 of 2005 is $ 1636 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: 2002 value: $1833 2001 value: $205 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 205 from 1833 which gives subtract(1833, 205), The final logic expression is subtract(1833, 205). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total decrease of cost of sales due to the adoption of the lifo method Context: as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . ### Output: Logic: to find the total decrease of cost of sales one must add the decreases of cost of sales and then subtract the increase in cost of sales to get the total decrease of cost of sales . The required values from the context for the question are: Reduction for 2006: $9978 Increase for 2005: $526 Reduction for 2004: $11212 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 9978 to 11212 which gives add(9978, 11212) step 2: subtract 526 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(add(9978, 11212), 526), The final logic expression is subtract(add(9978, 11212), 526). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the acquisition-related costs among the total purchase price? Context: the acquisition-related costs of ( in thousands ) is 2053 ; the total purchase price of ( in thousands ) is $ 22553 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the acquisition-related costs divided by the total purchase price , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: acquisition-related costs: 2053 (in thousands) total purchase price: $22553 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2053 by 22553 which gives divide(2053, 22553) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2053, 22553), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2053, 22553), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest return rate for the first year of the investment? Context: the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/13 is $ 100.00 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/14 is $ 100.81 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/15 is $ 101.92 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/16 is $ 119.68 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/17 is $ 146.19 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/18 is $ 153.88 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/13 is 100.00 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/14 is 111.39 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/15 is 110.58 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/16 is 121.13 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/17 is 144.65 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/18 is 135.63 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/13 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/14 is 121.41 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/15 is 93.55 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/16 is 120.89 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/17 is 154.19 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/18 is 140.25 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Return rate (12/13): $100.00 Return rate (12/14): $100.81 Return rate (12/15): $101.92 Return rate (12/16): $119.68 Return rate (12/17): $146.19 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 121.41 which gives subtract(121.41, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(121.41, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(121.41, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average value of interest expense net , in millions? Context: in millions the interest expense net of 2009 is -669 ( 669 ) ; the interest expense net of 2008 is -492 ( 492 ) ; the interest expense net of 2007 is -297 ( 297 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Interest expense net (2009): -669 (in millions) Interest expense net (2008): -492 (in millions) Interest expense net (2007): -297 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(interest expense net, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed in the value of operating expenses and other costs concerning the activities during 2008 and 2009? Context: in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 5680 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 6810 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 6530 ; in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 1091 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 474 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 839 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the values of operating costs expenses of each year . The required values from the context for the question are: Sales (2009): $5680 (in millions) Sales (2008): $6810 (in millions) Operating profit (2009): 1091 (in millions) Operating profit (2008): 474 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1091 from 5680 which gives subtract(5680, 1091) step 2: subtract 474 from 6810 which gives subtract(6810, 474) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(6810, 474), subtract(5680, 1091)), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(6810, 474), subtract(5680, 1091)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs among the total other corporate special items in addition in 2018? Context: in millions the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs of 2018 is $ 12 ; the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs of 2017 is $ 2014 ; the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs of 2016 is $ 2014 ; in millions the total of 2018 is $ 30 ; the total of 2017 is $ 2014 ; the total of 2016 is $ 8 ; other corporate special items in addition , other pre-tax corporate special items totaling $ 30 million , $ 0 million and $ 8 million were recorded in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs divided by the total then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Smurfit-kappa acquisition proposal costs (2018): $12 (in millions) Total of other corporate special items (2018): $30 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 12 by 30 which gives divide(12, 30) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 30), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(12, 30), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average operating profit? Context: in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 1091 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 474 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 839 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of values divided by three to represent the average . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating profit (2009): 1091 (in millions) Operating profit (2008): 474 (in millions) Operating profit (2007): 839 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(operating profit, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total expense for the company contribution plan from 2013 to 2015? Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 26.3 million in fiscal 2015 , $ 24.1 million in fiscal 2014 and $ 23.1 million in fiscal 2013 . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees , excluding settlement charges related to the company's irish defined benefit plan , was $ 33.3 million in fiscal 2015 , $ 29.8 million in fiscal 2014 and $ 26.5 million in fiscal 2013 . ### Output: Logic: in order to find the total expense one must added up all the expenses for the 4 years for both the us and non-us contribution plans . The required values from the context for the question are: Expense (U.S. employees 2015): $26.3 million Expense (U.S. employees 2014): $24.1 million Expense (U.S. employees 2013): $23.1 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 29.8 to 26.5 which gives add(29.8, 26.5) step 2: add 23.1 to 24.1 which gives add(23.1, 24.1) step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(29.8, 26.5), add(23.1, 24.1)) step 4: add 26.3 to 33.3 which gives add(26.3, 33.3) step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(29.8, 26.5), add(23.1, 24.1)), add(26.3, 33.3)), The final logic expression is add(add(add(29.8, 26.5), add(23.1, 24.1)), add(26.3, 33.3)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the difference in percentage that total expenses changed between the us and non-us employees from 2009 to 2011? Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . ### Output: Logic: to find the answer one must find the percentage increase for each the us and non-us . then compare these two numbers to find the difference in changes for the years . The required values from the context for the question are: US 2011: $21.9 million US 2009: $21.5 million Non-US 2011: $21.4 million Non-US 2009: $10.9 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21.5 from 21.9 which gives subtract(21.9, 21.5) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 21.5 which gives divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5) step 3: subtract 10.9 from 21.4 which gives subtract(21.4, 10.9) step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by 10.9 which gives divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9), divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9), divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the identifiable intangible assets as a percent of total goodwill? Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 107.3 million , resulting in total goodwill of $ 257.6 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of intangible assets divided by the total goodwill . The required values from the context for the question are: Identifiable Intangible Assets: $107.3 million Total Goodwill: $257.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 107.3 by 257.6 which gives divide(107.3, 257.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(107.3, 257.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(107.3, 257.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of electronics and safety sites among all sites? Context: the electronics and safety of north america is 3 ; the electronics and safety of europemiddle east& africa is 6 ; the electronics and safety of asia pacific is 3 ; the electronics and safety of south america is 2014 ; the electronics and safety of total is 12 ; the total of north america is 39 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 48 ; the total of asia pacific is 33 ; the total of south america is 6 ; the total of total is 126 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of sites related to electronics and safety divided by the total sites . The required values from the context for the question are: Electronics and Safety Total: 12 sites Total Sites: 126 sites Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 12 by 126 which gives divide(12, 126) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 126), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(12, 126), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage increase of inventories at lifo net from the beginning of 2012 to the end of 2013? Context: the inventories at fifo net of december 282013 is $ 2424795 ; the inventories at fifo net of december 292012 is $ 2182419 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 282013 is 131762 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 292012 is 126190 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 282013 is $ 2556557 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 292012 is $ 2308609 ; inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were as follows : december 28 , december 29 . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase of inventories at lifo net , one must take the inventories for 2013 and subtract it from the inventories from 2012 . then take the answer and divide it by the inventories for 2012 The required values from the context for the question are: Inventories at LIFO 2013: $2556557 Inventories at LIFO 2012: $2308609 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 2556557 by 2182419 which gives multiply(2556557, 2182419) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2182419 which gives divide(multiply(2556557, 2182419), 2182419), The final logic expression is divide(multiply(2556557, 2182419), 2182419). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in reserves against inventory from 2005 to 2006? Context: the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage change in reserves against inventory from 2005 to 2006 one must subtract the 2006 number from the 2005 and then take the answer and divide it by the reserves against inventory for 2005 . The required values from the context for the question are: Reserves 2006: $31376 Reserves 2005: $22825 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 22825 from 31376 which gives subtract(31376, 22825) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 22825 which gives divide(subtract(31376, 22825), 22825) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(31376, 22825), 22825), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(31376, 22825), 22825), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of powertrain systems sites among all sites? Context: the powertrain systems of north america is 4 ; the powertrain systems of europemiddle east& africa is 8 ; the powertrain systems of asia pacific is 5 ; the powertrain systems of south america is 1 ; the powertrain systems of total is 18 ; the total of north america is 39 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 48 ; the total of asia pacific is 33 ; the total of south america is 6 ; the total of total is 126 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of sites related to powertrain systems divided by the total sites . The required values from the context for the question are: Powertrain Systems Sites: 18 sites Total Sites: 126 sites Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 18 by 126 which gives divide(18, 126) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(18, 126), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(18, 126), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in deferred tax assets and regulatory assets from 2013 to 2014 Context: the acts effectively make the subsidy payments taxable in tax years beginning after december 31 , 2012 and as a result , the company followed its original accounting for the underfunded status of the other postretirement benefits for the medicare part d adjustment and recorded a reduction in deferred tax assets and an increase in its regulatory assets amounting to $ 6348 and $ 6241 at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the change in the deferred tax assets and an increase in its regulatory assets from 2013 to 2013 as a percent ( 2014 amt-2013amt ) /2013amt The required values from the context for the question are: Deferred Tax & Regulatory Assets 2014: $6348 Deferred Tax & Regulatory Assets 2013: $6241 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6241 from 6348 which gives subtract(6348, 6241) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 6241 which gives divide(subtract(6348, 6241), 6241) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(6348, 6241), 6241), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(6348, 6241), 6241), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the ratio of the total flight attendants to total maintenance personnel Context: the flight attendants of mainline operations is 24700 ; the flight attendants of wholly-owned regional carriers is 2200 ; the flight attendants of total is 26900 ; the maintenance personnel of mainline operations is 14900 ; the maintenance personnel of wholly-owned regional carriers is 2000 ; the maintenance personnel of total is 16900 ; ### Output: Logic: for every maintenance personnel there is 1.6 flight attendants The required values from the context for the question are: Total Flight Attendants: 26900 Total Maintenance Personnel: 16900 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 26900 by 16900 which gives divide(26900, 16900), The final logic expression is divide(26900, 16900). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total impairment costs recorded from 2003 to 2005 in millions Context: the company also recorded impair- ment charges of approximately $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in each of 2004 and 2003 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the company recorded impairment charges of approximately $ 0.5 million and $ 0.6 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively , and $ 4.7 million prior to 2003 to reduce the carrying value of its homerville , georgia dc ( which was sold in 2004 ) . ### Output: Logic: the total is the sum of all applicable amounts The required values from the context for the question are: Impairment 2005: $0.6 million Impairment 2004: $0.7 million (0.2 + 0.5) Impairment 2003: $0.8 million (0.2 + 0.6) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 0.6 to 0.5 which gives add(0.6, 0.5) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 4.7 which gives add(add(0.6, 0.5), 4.7), The final logic expression is add(add(0.6, 0.5), 4.7). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average operating income? Context: the operating income of 2016 is 895.2 ; the operating income of 2015 is 808.4 ; the operating income of 2014 is 762.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all operating margins divided by three ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating Income 2016: 895.2 Operating Income 2015: 808.4 Operating Income 2014: 762.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(operating income, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of lease payments will be paid out in the first year? Context: 2014 the total future minimum lease payments of $ 11057 is $ 57096 ; future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases at may 31 , 2013 were as follows : fiscal years ending may 31: . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of lease payments for the first year , one must divide the payment for the first year by the total amount of lease payments . The required values from the context for the question are: First Year Lease Payments: $11057 Total Lease Payments: $57096 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 11057 by 57096 which gives divide(11057, 57096) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(11057, 57096), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(11057, 57096), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average ending balance for valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets? Context: the ending balance of 2018 is $ 167142 ; the ending balance of 2017 is $ 466421 ; the ending balance of 2016 is $ 383221 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all ending balance values divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Ending Balance 2018: $167142 Ending Balance 2017: $466421 Ending Balance 2016: $383221 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(ending balance, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated percentage of revolving credit facility in relation with the total senior credit facility in millions? Context: we maintained a $ 1.4 billion senior credit facility with various financial institutions , including the $ 420.5 million term loan and a $ 945.5 million revolving credit facility . ### Output: Logic: its the ratio between the revolving credit facility ( $ 945.5 millions ) and the total senior credit facility ( $ 1.4 billions , which has to be converted to $ 1400 millions ) . The required values from the context for the question are: $1.4 billion senior credit facility $420.5 million term loan $945.5 million revolving credit facility Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1.4 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.4, const_1000) step 2: divide 945.5 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(945.5, multiply(1.4, const_1000)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(945.5, multiply(1.4, const_1000)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(945.5, multiply(1.4, const_1000)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of net assets acquired was considered goodwill? Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the net assets acquired of total is $ 16594 ; the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of net assets compared to goodwill , one must divide the goodwill by the total net assets . that gives you the percentage of goodwill to net assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill: $13536 Net assets acquired: $16594 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 13536 by 16594 which gives divide(13536, 16594) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net change in tax positions in 2014 Context: balance at january 1 2013 the increases in current period tax positions of $ 180993 is 53818 ; balance at january 1 2013 the decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions of $ 180993 is -36528 ( 36528 ) ; the total balance in the table above does not include interest and penalties of $ 157 and $ 242 as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , which is recorded as a component of income tax expense . ### Output: Logic: the net change in the tax position is the sum of the increase and the decrease plus the penalties and interest The required values from the context for the question are: Increases in current period tax positions: $53818 Decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions: -$36528 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 53818 to -36528 which gives add(53818, -36528) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 157 which gives add(add(53818, -36528), 157), The final logic expression is add(add(53818, -36528), 157). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the anualized return for s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017? Context: the cme group inc . of 2013 is $ 164.01 ; the cme group inc . of 2014 is $ 194.06 ; the cme group inc . of 2015 is $ 208.95 ; the cme group inc . of 2016 is $ 279.85 ; the cme group inc . of 2017 is $ 370.32 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 . the s&p 500 of 2013 is 132.39 ; the s&p 500 of 2014 is 150.51 ; the s&p 500 of 2015 is 152.59 ; the s&p 500 of 2016 is 170.84 ; the s&p 500 of 2017 is 208.14 ; ### Output: Logic: considering the years 2012-2017 , the anualized return is going to be the difference between the initial $ 100 and the final value of $ 108.14 took as a percentage and then calculated as in the compund interest's formula . The required values from the context for the question are: Initial investment: $100 S&P 500 in 2012 (start): Not provided S&P 500 in 2013: 132.39 S&P 500 in 2014: 150.51 S&P 500 in 2015: 152.59 S&P 500 in 2016: 170.84 S&P 500 in 2017: 208.14 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_1 from exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)) which gives subtract(exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(208.14, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the percentage of unrecognized tax benefits that may have an earnings impact? Context: the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2018 , was $ 29 million , resulting from the tax treatment of its research and experimental expenditures related to certain innovations in its horizontal drilling and completion projects , of which $ 12 million may potentially have an earnings impact . ### Output: Logic: it is the number of dollars related to unrecognized tax benefits that may have an earnings impact divided by the total value of unrecognized tax benefits . The required values from the context for the question are: Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018: $29 million Portion of unrecognized tax benefits that may have an earnings impact: $12 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 12 by 29 which gives divide(12, 29) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 29), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(12, 29), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the additions for tax positions of prior years and the current year , in millions? Context: balance at january 1 2007 the additions based on tax positions related to the current year of $ 53 is 4 ; balance at january 1 2007 the additions for tax positions of prior years of $ 53 is 24 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Additions based on tax positions related to the current year: 4 Additions for tax positions of prior years: 24 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4 from 24 which gives subtract(24, 4), The final logic expression is subtract(24, 4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the s&p 500 index from december 31 , 2004 to 2007 Context: the s&p 500 index of 2004 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 index of 2005 is 104.91 ; the s&p 500 index of 2006 is 121.48 ; the s&p 500 index of 2007 is 128.16 ; the s&p 500 index of 2008 is 80.74 ; the s&p 500 index of 2009 is 102.11 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divide by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: S&P 500 index in 2004: 100.00 S&P 500 index in 2005: 104.91 S&P 500 index in 2006: 121.48 S&P 500 index in 2007: 128.16 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 128.16 by const_100 which gives divide(128.16, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(128.16, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(128.16, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the average exercise price of options , what is the increase in the total value of stock options observed during 2016 and 2017 , in millions of dollars? Context: the stock options ( 1 ) of 2018 is 9 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2017 is 11 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2016 is 13 ; ( 1 ) the average exercise price of options per share was $ 26.79 , $ 33.32 , and $ 26.93 for 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the average exercise price of options per share multiplied by the number of shares in 2016 and 2017 . The required values from the context for the question are: Stock options in 2016: 13 Stock options in 2017: 11 Average exercise price of options in 2016: $26.93 Average exercise price of options in 2017: $33.32 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 13 by 26.93 which gives multiply(13, 26.93) step 2: multiply 11 by 33.32 which gives multiply(11, 33.32) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(11, 33.32), multiply(13, 26.93)), The final logic expression is subtract(multiply(11, 33.32), multiply(13, 26.93)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 312018 what was the percent of restricted cash and marketable securities dedicated to the support our insurance programs Context: accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2018 , we had $ 108.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 78.6 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . ### Output: Logic: to obtain the percent of restricted cash and marketable securities dedicated to the support our insurance programs to the total the percent of restricted cash and marketable securities divide the restricted dedicated amount by the total amount The required values from the context for the question are: Restricted cash and marketable securities as of December 31, 2018: $108.1 million Restricted cash and marketable securities supporting insurance programs: $78.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 78.6 by 108.1 which gives divide(78.6, 108.1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(78.6, 108.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(78.6, 108.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent increase in long-term debt did the floating rate notes maturing in 2010? Context: 2007 the 2010 of $ 2.6 is 240.9 ; 2007 the 2011 of $ 2.6 is 500.0 ; the new floating rate notes mature on november 15 , 2010 and bear interest at a per annum rate equal to three-month libor plus 200 basis points , 125 basis points less than the interest rate on the old floating rate notes . in connection with the exchange , we made an early participation payment of $ 41.25 ( actual amount ) in cash per $ 1000 ( actual amount ) principal amount of old floating rate notes for a total payment of $ 10.3 . ### Output: Logic: the company's floating rate notes matured in 2010 which likely is the cause of the significant increase in long-term debt . to find the percentage we take the 2011 and subtract that number from the 2010 . we take this solution and divide it by 2010? The required values from the context for the question are: 2010 long-term debt value: 240.9 2011 long-term debt value: 500.0 Early participation payment: $41.25 per $1000 Total payment: $10.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 240.9 from 500.0 which gives subtract(500.0, 240.9) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 240.9 which gives divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of net assets acquired was considered goodwill? Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the net assets acquired of total is $ 16594 ; the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of net assets compared to goodwill , one must divide the goodwill by the total net assets . that gives you the percentage of goodwill to net assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill: $13536 Net assets acquired: $16594 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 13536 by 16594 which gives divide(13536, 16594) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(13536, 16594), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase of the total trading assets between the years 2007 and 2008 , in millions of dollars? Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the sum of the trading assets during 2007 and 2008 . The required values from the context for the question are: Trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments in 2007: $381415 Trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments in 2008: $384102 Trading assets 2013 derivative receivables in 2007: 65439 Trading assets 2013 derivative receivables in 2008: 121417 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 381415 to 65439 which gives add(381415, 65439) step 2: add 384102 to 121417 which gives add(384102, 121417) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(add(384102, 121417), add(381415, 65439)), The final logic expression is subtract(add(384102, 121417), add(381415, 65439)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the contractual obligations in which payments due by 1-3 years , what is the percentage of the operating leases in relation to the total obligations? Context: contractual obligations the operating leases of payments due by period total is $ 44048 ; the operating leases of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 7957 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 13789 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 11061 ; the operating leases of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 11241 ; contractual obligations the total of payments due by period total is $ 95519 ; the total of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 55923 ; the total of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 16054 ; the total of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 12301 ; the total of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 11241 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the operating leases ( $ 13789 ) divided by the total obligations ( $ 16054 ) in this period . The required values from the context for the question are: operating leases 1-3 years: $13789 total obligations 1-3 years: $16054 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 13789 by 16054 which gives divide(13789, 16054) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(13789, 16054), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(13789, 16054), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how bigger were the interest and penalties concerning the interest income in the year 2015? Context: in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , alcoa recognized $ 8 , $ 1 , and $ 2 , respectively , in interest and penalties . due to the expiration of the statute of limitations , settlements with tax authorities , and refunded overpayments , alcoa also recognized interest income of $ 2 , $ 5 , and $ 12 in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the interest and penalties divided by the interest income then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: interest and penalties 2015: $8 interest income 2015: $2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 8 by 2 which gives divide(8, 2) step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(8, 2), 1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(8, 2), 1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(8, 2), 1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the anualized return for cme group from 2012 to 2017? Context: the cme group inc . of 2013 is $ 164.01 ; the cme group inc . of 2014 is $ 194.06 ; the cme group inc . of 2015 is $ 208.95 ; the cme group inc . of 2016 is $ 279.85 ; the cme group inc . of 2017 is $ 370.32 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 . ### Output: Logic: considering the years 2012-2017 , the anualized return is going to be the difference between the initial $ 100 and the final value of $ 370.32 took as a percentage and then calculated as in the compund interest's formula . The required values from the context for the question are: initial investment: $100 final value 2017: $370.32 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_1 from exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)) which gives subtract(exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(exp(divide(subtract(370.32, 100), 100), divide(const_1, const_5)), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentual decrease observed in the liabilities for accrued interest and penalties during 2012 and 2013? Context: liabilities for accrued interest and penalties were $ 665 million and $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value of liabilities for accrued interest and penalties minus the initial one , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: liabilities for accrued interest and penalties 2013: $665 million liabilities for accrued interest and penalties 2012: $1.2 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1.2 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.2, const_1000) step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from 665 which gives subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000)) step 3: multiply 1.2 by const_1000 which gives multiply(1.2, const_1000) step 4: divide the expression of step 2 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000)), multiply(1.2, const_1000)) step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000)), multiply(1.2, const_1000)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(665, multiply(1.2, const_1000)), multiply(1.2, const_1000)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the payments due to less than a year , what is the percentage of purchase obligations concerning the total expenses? Context: contractual obligations the purchase obligations of payments due by period total is $ 265409 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 265409 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 0 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 0 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 0 ; contractual obligations the total of payments due by period total is $ 296554 ; the total of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 268766 ; the total of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 6271 ; the total of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 6040 ; the total of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 15477 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of purchase obligations divided by the value of the total expenses . The required values from the context for the question are: purchase obligations less than 1 year: $265409 total expenses less than 1 year: $268766 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 265409 by 268766 which gives divide(265409, 268766) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(265409, 268766), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(265409, 268766), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 31.2013 what was the ratio of the interest and penalty as a percent of the total unrecognized tax benefits Context: the total balance in the table above does not include interest and penalties of $ 242 and $ 260 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively , which is recorded as a component of income tax expense . balance at january 1 2012 the balance at december 31 2013 of $ 158578 is $ 177947 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent of the total balance representing interest and penalty add the interest and penalty to the end balance then divide the intrest by the end balance The required values from the context for the question are: interest and penalties 2013: $242 total unrecognized tax benefits 2013: $158578 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 242 to 177947 which gives add(242, 177947) step 2: divide 242 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(242, add(242, 177947)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(242, add(242, 177947)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(242, add(242, 177947)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the average exercise price of options , what is the estimated total value of stock options in 2018 , in millions of dollars? Context: the stock options ( 1 ) of 2018 is 9 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2017 is 11 ; the stock options ( 1 ) of 2016 is 13 ; ( 1 ) the average exercise price of options per share was $ 26.79 , $ 33.32 , and $ 26.93 for 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the average exercise price of options per share multiplied by the number of shares . The required values from the context for the question are: stock options 2018: 9 average exercise price 2018: $26.79 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 9 by 26.79 which gives multiply(9, 26.79), The final logic expression is multiply(9, 26.79). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual increase in the balance during the year 2007? Context: balance at january 1 2007 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 53 is $ 70 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the balance at the end of the year divided by the initial one , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: balance January 1 2007: $53 balance December 31 2007: $70 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 70 by 53 which gives divide(70, 53) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(70, 53), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(70, 53), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(70, 53), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage increase in total expense from 2017 to 2018? Context: the total expense of 2018 is $ 156 ; the total expense of 2017 is $ 15 ; income taxes . ### Output: Logic: get difference , then divide by starting value , then multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: total expense 2018: $156 total expense 2017: $15 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 15 from 156 which gives subtract(156, 15) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 15 which gives divide(subtract(156, 15), 15) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2015 what was the the percentage change in the account balance Context: the balance at beginning of year of 2015 is $ 38.9 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2014 is $ 38.3 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2013 is $ 45.3 ; the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 46.7 ; the balance at end of year of 2014 is $ 38.9 ; the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 38.3 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from the begin to the end divide by the begin The required values from the context for the question are: balance beginning of year 2015: $38.9 balance end of year 2015: $46.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 38.9 from 46.7 which gives subtract(46.7, 38.9) step 2: subtract 38.9 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(46.7, 38.9), 38.9) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(46.7, 38.9), 38.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(46.7, 38.9), 38.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the expected return rate on assets , what is the total value of plan assets in 2008 , in millions? Context: ( in millions ) the expected return on assets of 25 basis-point increase is $ -1.7 ( 1.7 ) ; the expected return on assets of 25 basis-point decrease is $ 1.7 ; for fi scal 2008 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) for our u.s . ### Output: Logic: the total value is calculated using 7.75% as the expected return rate , which value is 1.7 , then multiplying by 100 and dividing by 7.75 to approach the 100% value . The required values from the context for the question are: expected return on assets: 7.75% expected return value: $1.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1.7 by const_100 which gives multiply(1.7, const_100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7.75 which gives divide(multiply(1.7, const_100), 7.75), The final logic expression is divide(multiply(1.7, const_100), 7.75). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease observed in the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2017 and 2018? Context: the total fair value of restricted stock vested during fiscal years 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 was $ 2.2 , $ 4.1 , and $ 4.3 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual decrease of the total fair value of restricted stock that vested , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value of the final value , then dividing by the initial value and turning it into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: total fair value of restricted stock 2018: $2.2 total fair value of restricted stock 2017: $4.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 4.1 from 2.2 which gives subtract(2.2, 4.1) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 4.1 which gives divide(subtract(2.2, 4.1), 4.1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2.2, 4.1), 4.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2.2, 4.1), 4.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase in the operating margin observed in 2015 and 2016? Context: the operating margin of 2016 is 26.8% ( 26.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2015 is 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) ; the operating margin of 2014 is 18.7% ( 18.7 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between these operating margins . The required values from the context for the question are: operating margin 2016: 26.8% operating margin 2015: 21.9% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21.9% from 26.8% which gives subtract(26.8%, 21.9%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(26.8%, 21.9%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(26.8%, 21.9%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2008 what was the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts Context: the balance at beginning of year of 2010 is $ 55.2 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2009 is $ 65.7 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2008 is $ 14.7 ; the balance at end of year of 2010 is $ 50.9 ; the balance at end of year of 2009 is $ 55.2 ; the balance at end of year of 2008 is $ 65.7 ; ### Output: Logic: the change is the difference from the begin to the end The required values from the context for the question are: balance at beginning of year of 2008: $14.7 balance at end of year of 2008: $65.7 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 14.7 from 65.7 which gives subtract(65.7, 14.7), The final logic expression is subtract(65.7, 14.7). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage increase in total expense from 2017 to 2018? Context: the total expense of 2018 is $ 156 ; the total expense of 2017 is $ 15 ; income taxes . ### Output: Logic: get difference , then divide by starting value , then multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: total expense of 2018: $156 total expense of 2017: $15 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 15 from 156 which gives subtract(156, 15) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 15 which gives divide(subtract(156, 15), 15) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by const_100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(multiply(divide(subtract(156, 15), 15), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage effect of the hedges on the anticipated increase in the 2014 increase in fuel expenses Context: based on our 2014 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that as of december 31 , 2013 , a $ 1 per barrel increase in the price of crude oil would increase our 2014 annual fuel expense by $ 104 million ( excluding the effect of our hedges ) , and by $ 87 million ( taking into account such hedges ) . ### Output: Logic: to find the percent you get the change in the amounts and divide it by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: increase in fuel expense per $1 per barrel increase without hedges: $104 million increase in fuel expense per $1 per barrel increase with hedges: $87 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 87 from 104 which gives subtract(104, 87) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 87 which gives divide(subtract(104, 87), 87) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(104, 87), 87), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(104, 87), 87), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the operating leases with payments due to 3-5 years and payments due to more than 5 years? Context: contractual obligations the operating leases of payments due by period total is $ 31145 ; the operating leases of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 3357 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 6271 ; the operating leases of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 6040 ; the operating leases of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 15477 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those two payments of operating leases . The required values from the context for the question are: operating leases of payments due by period 3-5 years: $6040 operating leases of payments due by period more than 5 years: $15477 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6040 from 15477 which gives subtract(15477, 6040), The final logic expression is subtract(15477, 6040). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the growth of the balance throughout the fiscal year , during 2007 and 2008? Context: the balance at beginning of year of december 27 2008 is $ 126.6 ; the balance at beginning of year of december 29 2007 is $ 70.5 ; the balance at december 27 2008 of december 27 2008 is $ 214.4 ; the balance at december 27 2008 of december 29 2007 is $ 126.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the percentual growth ( final balance as a percent of initial balance ) of each year . The required values from the context for the question are: balance at beginning of year of december 27 2008: $126.6 balance at beginning of year of december 29 2007: $70.5 balance at december 27 2008 of december 27 2008: $214.4 balance at december 27 2008 of december 29 2007: $126.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 214.4 by 126.6 which gives divide(214.4, 126.6) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1) step 3: divide 126.6 by 70.5 which gives divide(126.6, 70.5) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1), subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1), subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(126.6, 70.5), const_1), subtract(divide(214.4, 126.6), const_1)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the payment of dividends during 2017 and 2018? Context: the total of 2018 is $ 4.25 ; the total of 2017 is $ 3.71 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: total of 2018: $4.25 total of 2017: $3.71 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 4.25 by 3.71 which gives divide(4.25, 3.71) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(4.25, 3.71), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(4.25, 3.71), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(4.25, 3.71), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth of consolidated net sales , in percentage , from 2005 to 2007 Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 5400 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005 is $ 5038 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 20142006 is 43% ( 43 % ) ; the segment net sales of 2006 20142005 is 7% ( 7 % ) ; in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 21% ( 21 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 13% ( 13 % ) in 2006 and 14% ( 14 % ) in 2005 . ### Output: Logic: to find out the consolidated net sales , you must take the percentage of segmented net sales given in line 17 . once found out the consolidated net sales you figure out the percentage of change over that time period . which was 130% The required values from the context for the question are: segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007: $7729 segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006: $5400 segment net sales of years ended december 31 2005: $5038 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 5038 by 14% which gives multiply(5038, 14%) step 2: multiply 7729 by 21% which gives multiply(7729, 21%) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%)) step 4: multiply 5038 by 14% which gives multiply(5038, 14%) step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%)), multiply(5038, 14%)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%)), multiply(5038, 14%)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7729, 21%), multiply(5038, 14%)), multiply(5038, 14%)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the fluctuation between the effective tax expense rate and the statutory u.s . federal tax rate in 2016? Context: the statutory u.s . federal tax rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . federal tax rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . federal tax rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2017 is ( 60.8 ) % ( % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2016 is 32.9% ( 32.9 % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2015 is 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) ; in 2016 , the effective rate was lower than the statutory tax rate largely due to the release of the valuation allowances related to the sale of bm&fbovespa shares . federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . ### Output: Logic: its the difference between those tax rates The required values from the context for the question are: statutory u.s. federal tax rate of 2016: 35.0% effective tax expense rate of 2016: 32.9% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 32.9% from 35% which gives subtract(35%, 32.9%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(35%, 32.9%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(35%, 32.9%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the decrease of the effective tax expense rate between 2015 and 2016? Context: the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2017 is ( 60.8 ) % ( % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2016 is 32.9% ( 32.9 % ) ; the effective tax expense ( benefit ) rate of 2015 is 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the tax rate from 2015 to 2016 The required values from the context for the question are: effective tax expense rate of 2016: 32.9% effective tax expense rate of 2015: 36.3% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 32.9% from 36.3% which gives subtract(36.3%, 32.9%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(36.3%, 32.9%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(36.3%, 32.9%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the net derivative gains during 2006 and 2007? Context: ( millions ) as of december 31 the net derivative gains ( losses ) of 2007 is $ 24 ; the net derivative gains ( losses ) of 2006 is $ 15 ; the net derivative gains ( losses ) of 2005 is $ -11 ( 11 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the net derivative value of 2007 divided by the 2006's , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: net derivative gains of 2007: $24 net derivative gains of 2006: $15 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 24 by 15 which gives divide(24, 15) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(24, 15), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(24, 15), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(24, 15), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2008 net deferred loss , what is the percentage of amortization expenses? Context: for fi scal 2008 , our pension plans had actual negative return on assets of $ 19.3 million as compared with expected return on assets of $ 47.0 million , which resulted in a net deferred loss of $ 66.3 million , of which approximately $ 34 million is subject to amortiza- tion over periods ranging from approximately 8 to 16 years . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the amortizations divided by the total net deferred loss , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: net deferred loss of 2008: $66.3 million amortizations subject to net deferred loss: $34 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 34 by 66.3 which gives divide(34, 66.3) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(34, 66.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(34, 66.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the the research and development costs from 2014 to 2015 Context: research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the current amount less the most recent amount divide by the most recent amount The required values from the context for the question are: research and development expense for 2015: $119 million research and development expense for 2014: $86 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 86 from 119 which gives subtract(119, 86) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 86 which gives add(subtract(119, 86), 86) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_2 which gives divide(add(subtract(119, 86), 86), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(subtract(119, 86), 86), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 312013 what was the percent of labor-related deemed claim as part of the total reorganization items net Context: the labor-related deemed claim ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 1733 ; the total reorganization items net of december 31 2013 is $ 2655 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the amount divided by the total multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: labor-related deemed claim (December 31, 2013): $1733 total reorganization items net (December 31, 2013): $2655 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1733 by 2655 which gives divide(1733, 2655) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1733, 2655), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1733, 2655), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage decline in recorded international slot and route authorities to $ 708 million from $ 736 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . Context: intangible assets the company has recorded international slot and route authorities of $ 708 million and $ 736 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: to get the percentage change we subtract the recent amount from the most recent and divide by the recent amount The required values from the context for the question are: international slot and route authorities (December 31, 2010): $708 million international slot and route authorities (December 31, 2009): $736 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 736 from 708 which gives subtract(708, 736) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 736 which gives divide(subtract(708, 736), 736) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(708, 736), 736), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(708, 736), 736), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent increase in long-term debt did the floating rate notes maturing in 2010? Context: 2007 the 2010 of $ 2.6 is 240.9 ; 2007 the 2011 of $ 2.6 is 500.0 ; the new floating rate notes mature on november 15 , 2010 and bear interest at a per annum rate equal to three-month libor plus 200 basis points , 125 basis points less than the interest rate on the old floating rate notes . in connection with the exchange , we made an early participation payment of $ 41.25 ( actual amount ) in cash per $ 1000 ( actual amount ) principal amount of old floating rate notes for a total payment of $ 10.3 . ### Output: Logic: the company's floating rate notes matured in 2010 which likely is the cause of the significant increase in long-term debt . to find the percentage we take the 2011 and subtract that number from the 2010 . we take this solution and divide it by 2010? The required values from the context for the question are: 2010 value: $240.9 2011 value: $500.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 240.9 from 500.0 which gives subtract(500.0, 240.9) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 240.9 which gives divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(500.0, 240.9), 240.9), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in light of the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets ( managed basis ) , what is the total value of the average assets in 2018 , in millions of dollars? Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the average interest-earning assets of 2018 is $ 2229188 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2017 is $ 2180592 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2016 is $ 2101604 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis of 2018 is 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ; the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis of 2017 is 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) ; the net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis of 2016 is 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: considering the average interest-earning assets as 2.5% of the average assets earning , the total value is calculated multiplying it for 100 and then dividing by the interest's percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: average interest-earning assets (2018): $2229188 million net interest yield on average interest-earning assets (2018): 2.50% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 2229188 by const_100 which gives multiply(2229188, const_100) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 2.50 which gives divide(multiply(2229188, const_100), 2.50), The final logic expression is divide(multiply(2229188, const_100), 2.50). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of americans labor-related deemed claim as a part of the total claims and other bankruptcy settlement obligations as of december2013 Context: aag series a preferred stock the labor-related deemed claim of $ 3329 is 849 ; aag series a preferred stock the total of $ 3329 is $ 5424 ; ### Output: Logic: to get the percent you divide the amount in question by the total and multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: labor-related deemed claim: $849 total: $5424 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 849 by 5424 which gives divide(849, 5424) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(849, 5424), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(849, 5424), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what are the average net unrealized investment gains for the period? Context: ( millions ) as of december 31 the net unrealized investment gains of 2007 is 76 ; the net unrealized investment gains of 2006 is 73 ; the net unrealized investment gains of 2005 is 52 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all net unrealized investment gains divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: net unrealized investment gains (2007): 76 net unrealized investment gains (2006): 73 net unrealized investment gains (2005): 52 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(net unrealized investment gains, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 312011 what was the ratio of the loans with a maturity in 2037 to the loans with a maturity in 2033 Context: trusts the etbh capital trust xxv 2014xxx of face value is 110000 ; the etbh capital trust xxv 2014xxx of maturity date is 2037 ; the etbh capital trust xxv 2014xxx of annual interest rate is 1.90%-2.00% ( 1.90%-2.00 % ) above 3-month libor ; trusts the etbh capital trust vii ix 2014xii of face value is 65000 ; the etbh capital trust vii ix 2014xii of maturity date is 2033 ; the etbh capital trust vii ix 2014xii of annual interest rate is 3.00%-3.30% ( 3.00%-3.30 % ) above 3-month libor ; ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the loans with a maturity in 2037 to the loans with a maturity in 2033 was 1.69 to 1 The required values from the context for the question are: loans with a maturity in 2037: 110000 loans with a maturity in 2033: 65000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 110000 by 65000 which gives divide(110000, 65000), The final logic expression is divide(110000, 65000). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total cost in millions of capital lease obligation , principal only? Context: contractual obligations millions of dollars the capital lease obligations [b] of total is 2975 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2010 is 290 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2011 is 292 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2012 is 247 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2013 is 256 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 2014 is 267 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 after 2014 is 1623 ; the capital lease obligations [b] of payments due by december 31 other is - ; [b] represents total obligations , including interest component of $ 914 million . ### Output: Logic: subtract interest component The required values from the context for the question are: capital lease obligations total: 2975 million interest component: $914 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 914 from 2975 which gives subtract(2975, 914), The final logic expression is subtract(2975, 914). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average liability for uncertain tax positions , in millions? Context: the company 2019s liability for uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , includes $ 228 million , $ 219 million , and $ 240 million , respectively , related to amounts that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all liability for uncertain tax positions divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: liability for uncertain tax positions (2018): $228 million liability for uncertain tax positions (2017): $219 million liability for uncertain tax positions (2016): $240 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 228 to 219 which gives add(228, 219) step 2: add 240 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(240, add(228, 219)) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(240, add(228, 219)), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(240, add(228, 219)), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total value of the approved equity compensation plans in 2005 , in millions of dollars? Context: plan category the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) is 1211143 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) is $ 308.10 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 5156223 ; the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders . ### Output: Logic: its the number of the approved equity compensation plans multiplied by it's exercise price . The required values from the context for the question are: number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options: 1211143 weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options: $308.10 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 1211143 by 308.10 which gives multiply(1211143, 308.10) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_1000000 which gives divide(multiply(1211143, 308.10), const_1000000), The final logic expression is divide(multiply(1211143, 308.10), const_1000000). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the net interest income managed basis in 2017 , what is the amount of expenses associated with liabilities , in millions of dollars? Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the average interest-earning assets of 2018 is $ 2229188 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2017 is $ 2180592 ; the average interest-earning assets of 2016 is $ 2101604 ; ### Output: Logic: the expenses associated with liabilities is the difference between the revenue generated from the average interest-earning assets and the net interest income . The required values from the context for the question are: net interest income managed basis (2017): $51410 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 51410 from 2180592 which gives subtract(2180592, 51410), The final logic expression is subtract(2180592, 51410). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2011-2013 , what is the average value of settlements? Context: the settlements of 2013 is -603 ( 603 ) ; the settlements of 2012 is -67 ( 67 ) ; the settlements of 2011 is -259 ( 259 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all settlements divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: settlements (2013): -603 settlements (2012): -67 settlements (2011): -259 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(settlements, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: whats is the percentage of equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders? Context: plan category the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) is 5978 ; the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) is 22.00 ; the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 2014 ; plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) is 1217121 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) is ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 5156223 ; ### Output: Logic: its the division between the equity compensation plans that were not approved and the total equity compensation plans . The required values from the context for the question are: equity compensation plans not approved by security holders of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a): 5978 total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a): 1217121 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 5978 by 1217121 which gives divide(5978, 1217121) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(5978, 1217121), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(5978, 1217121), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2011 what was the total operating costs in millions Context: year the 2011 of gallons consumed ( in millions ) is 2756 ; the 2011 of average costper gallon is $ 3.01 ; the 2011 of total cost ( in millions ) is $ 8304 ; the 2011 of percent of total operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: to obtain the total costs you divide the expenses provide by their given percent of the total operating expenses The required values from the context for the question are: 2011 of total cost (in millions): $8304 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 8304 by 33.2% which gives divide(8304, 33.2%), The final logic expression is divide(8304, 33.2%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the amount of the total impairment charges included in sg&a expense from 2005 to 2007 in millions Context: the company recorded impairment charges included in sg&a expense of approximately $ 0.2 million in the 2007 predecessor period , $ 9.4 million in 2006 and $ 0.6 million in 2005 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . ### Output: Logic: the total amount in question is the sum of all amounts The required values from the context for the question are: impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2007: $0.2 million impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2006: $9.4 million impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2005: $0.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 0.2 to 9.4 which gives add(0.2, 9.4) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 0.6 which gives add(add(0.2, 9.4), 0.6), The final logic expression is add(add(0.2, 9.4), 0.6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase in the settlements with tax authorities as a percent of the tax liabilities observed during 2013 and 2014? Context: december 31 , the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -2 ( 2 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -4 ( 4 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -2 ( 2 ) ; december 31 , the settlements with tax authorities of 2015 is -2 ( 2 ) ; the settlements with tax authorities of 2014 is -29 ( 29 ) ; the settlements with tax authorities of 2013 is -8 ( 8 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the settlements with tax authorities' percentage in tax liabilities.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: settlements with tax authorities of 2014: -29 (29) settlements with tax authorities of 2013: -8 (8) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 8 to 2 which gives add(8, 2) step 2: divide 8 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(8, add(8, 2)) step 3: add 29 to 4 which gives add(29, 4) step 4: divide 29 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(29, add(29, 4)) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(divide(29, add(29, 4)), divide(8, add(8, 2))) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(29, add(29, 4)), divide(8, add(8, 2))), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(29, add(29, 4)), divide(8, add(8, 2))), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2014 , what are the variation between the expenses for environmental remediation at sites and the reserves environmental matters , in millions? Context: we incurred $ 4.4 million , $ 2.9 million , and $ 2.1 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 15.2 million and $ 8.8 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the expenses' value and the value of the reserve in that year . The required values from the context for the question are: expenses for environmental remediation at sites 2014: $2.9 million reserves for environmental matters 2014: $8.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 2.9 from 8.8 which gives subtract(8.8, 2.9), The final logic expression is subtract(8.8, 2.9). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2007 what was the ratio of the interest expense to the interest income Context: ( millions ) the interest expense of 2007 is $ 210 ; the interest expense of 2006 is $ 122 ; the interest expense of 2005 is $ 82 ; ( millions ) the interest income of 2007 is -132 ( 132 ) ; the interest income of 2006 is -51 ( 51 ) ; the interest income of 2005 is -56 ( 56 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the interest expense to the interest income was 1.59 to 1 The required values from the context for the question are: interest expense 2007: $210 interest income 2007: -132 (132) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 210 by 132 which gives divide(210, 132), The final logic expression is divide(210, 132). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the decrease observed in the additions for tax positions of prior years , in millions? Context: the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2018 is 10 ; the additions for tax positions of prior years of 2017 is 12 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: additions for tax positions of prior years 2018: 10 additions for tax positions of prior years 2017: 12 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 10 from 12 which gives subtract(12, 10), The final logic expression is subtract(12, 10). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total equity in 2009 , in millions of dollars? Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2009 is $ 60224 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2008 is $ 78841 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2007 is $ 94737 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between the total assets and the total liabilities . The required values from the context for the question are: trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments 2009: $318063 trading assets 2013 derivative receivables 2009: 110457 trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments (a) 2009: $60224 trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables 2009: 77901 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 60224 to 77901 which gives add(60224, 77901) step 2: add 318063 to 110457 which gives add(318063, 110457) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(add(318063, 110457), add(60224, 77901)), The final logic expression is subtract(add(318063, 110457), add(60224, 77901)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the operating margin in the 4th quarter Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 1st qtr is 132 ; the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 2nd qtr is 152 ; the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 3rd qtr is 144 ; the earnings ( loss ) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr ( 3 ) is 79 ; ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 1st qtr is $ 1594 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 2nd qtr is $ 1719 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 3rd qtr is $ 1717 ; the sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr ( 3 ) is $ 1927 ; ### Output: Logic: the operating margin is the operating income divide by the revenues The required values from the context for the question are: earnings (loss) before income taxes of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr (3): 79 sales and service revenues of year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr (3): $1927 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 144 by 1927 which gives divide(144, 1927) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(144, 1927), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(144, 1927), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately between 2006 and 2005 . Context: the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 5.8 million at february 3 , 2006 and $ 6.3 million at january 28 , 2005 . ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from the recent to most recent divided by the recent multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: excess of current cost over lifo cost at february 3, 2006: $5.8 million excess of current cost over lifo cost at january 28, 2005: $6.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 6.3 from 5.8 which gives subtract(5.8, 6.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 6.3 which gives divide(subtract(5.8, 6.3), 6.3) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(5.8, 6.3), 6.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(5.8, 6.3), 6.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percent growth of borrowings outstanding from 2016 to 2017 Context: the maximum borrowings outstanding of 2017 is 1135 ; the maximum borrowings outstanding of 2016 is 1016 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the difference between the ( end balance and the begin balance ) /begin balance The required values from the context for the question are: maximum borrowings outstanding of 2017: 1135 maximum borrowings outstanding of 2016: 1016 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1016 from 1135 which gives subtract(1135, 1016) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1016 which gives divide(subtract(1135, 1016), 1016) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1135, 1016), 1016), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1135, 1016), 1016), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much more money was expensed per outstanding basic weighted-average share in the year ended dec 31 , 2013 compared to the year ended dec 31 , 2014? Context: ( in millions ) the basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 170.3 ; the basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31 , 2014 is 170.6 ; the basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31 , 2013 ( 1 ) is 156.6 ; a reconciliation of basic weighted-average shares outstanding to diluted weighted-average shares outstanding is as follows: . for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the amounts expensed for these plans were $ 19.8 million , $ 21.9 million and $ 17.3 million , respectively . ### Output: Logic: divide total number of shares by expenses for 2013 and 2014 . then subtract the 2014 answer from the 2013 answer The required values from the context for the question are: basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31, 2015: 170.3 basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31, 2014: 170.6 basic weighted-average shares outstanding of years ended december 31, 2013: 156.6 amounts expensed for the years ended december 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013: $19.8 million, $21.9 million, $17.3 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 170.6 by 21.9 which gives divide(170.6, 21.9) step 2: divide 156.6 by 17.3 which gives divide(156.6, 17.3) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(156.6, 17.3), divide(170.6, 21.9)), The final logic expression is subtract(divide(156.6, 17.3), divide(170.6, 21.9)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total balance in 2018 , if the company was to include interest and penalty liabilities? Context: the balance at end of fiscal year of 2018 is $ 127.1 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2017 is $ 148.9 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2016 is $ 166.8 ; as of september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 127.1 million and $ 148.9 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . ### Output: Logic: in line 6 , it lets the reader know that interest and penalties are not included in the total balance . line 10 gives the total amount of interest and penalties for that period . therefore , to find the total balance you would subtract total balance from table by interest and penalties The required values from the context for the question are: balance at end of fiscal year of 2018: $127.1 estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in 2018: $70.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 70.4 from 127.1 which gives subtract(127.1, 70.4), The final logic expression is subtract(127.1, 70.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total number of grants were forfeited? Context: the forfeited of shares is -79 ( 79 ) ; the forfeited of weighted averagegrant-datefair value is 43 ; the forfeited of shares is -91 ( 91 ) ; the forfeited of weighted averagegrant-datefair value is 44 ; the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the years ended may 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( share awards in thousands ) : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . ### Output: Logic: to figure out the total number of forfeited grants one must added up all the forfeited from the table . The required values from the context for the question are: forfeited shares: -79, -91 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 79 to 91 which gives add(79, 91), The final logic expression is add(79, 91). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the professional fees as part of the total re-organization costs Context: as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at john f . the total reorganization items net of december 31 2013 is $ 2655 ; ### Output: Logic: the percent is the amount divided by the total multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: reorganization charges on rejected special facility revenue bonds: $180 million total reorganization items net of december 31 2013: $2655 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1990 by 2655 which gives divide(1990, 2655) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1990, 2655), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1990, 2655), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage difference of consolidated net sales from 2006 to 2008? Context: in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 40% ( 40 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 52% ( 52 % ) in 2007 and 66% ( 66 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 12099 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 18988 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006 is $ 28383 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 20142007 is ( 36 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2007 20142006 is ( 33 ) % ( % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage of consolidated net sales from 2006 to 2008 decreased 287% . to figure out this answer one must find out the consolidated net sales from the segmented net sales . you take the percentage given in line 14 and multiple that by the segmented net sales . then minus the 2006 and 2008 consolidated net sales and divide by the 2006 consolidated net sales to get 287% . The required values from the context for the question are: segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008: $12099 segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007: $18988 segment net sales of years ended december 31 2006: $28383 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 40% by 12099 which gives multiply(40%, 12099) step 2: multiply 66% by 28383 which gives multiply(66%, 28383) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099)) step 4: multiply 40% by 12099 which gives multiply(40%, 12099) step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099)), multiply(40%, 12099)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099)), multiply(40%, 12099)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(66%, 28383), multiply(40%, 12099)), multiply(40%, 12099)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the total balance in 2018 , if the company was to include interest and penalty liabilities? Context: the balance at end of fiscal year of 2018 is $ 127.1 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2017 is $ 148.9 ; the balance at end of fiscal year of 2016 is $ 166.8 ; as of september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 127.1 million and $ 148.9 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . ### Output: Logic: in line 6 , it lets the reader know that interest and penalties are not included in the total balance . line 10 gives the total amount of interest and penalties for that period . therefore , to find the total balance you would subtract total balance from table by interest and penalties The required values from the context for the question are: balance at end of fiscal year of 2018: $127.1 estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in 2018: $70.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 70.4 from 127.1 which gives subtract(127.1, 70.4), The final logic expression is subtract(127.1, 70.4). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2015 , what is the percentage of reserves for environmental matters related to remediation of sites? Context: as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 15.2 million and $ 8.8 million . of these amounts $ 2.8 million and $ 2.4 million , respectively , relate to remediation of sites previously disposed by us . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the reserves for remediation of sites divided by the total value of all reserves for environmental matters.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: reserves for environmental matters for 2015 and 2014: $15.2 million, $8.8 million reserves related to remediation of sites for 2015 and 2014: $2.8 million, $2.4 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2.8 by 15.2 which gives divide(2.8, 15.2) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2.8, 15.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2.8, 15.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net tax positions for 2012 Context: balance at january 1 2012 the increases in current period tax positions of $ 158578 is 40620 ; balance at january 1 2012 the decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions of $ 158578 is -18205 ( 18205 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net change in the tax position is the sum of the increase and the decrease The required values from the context for the question are: increases in current period tax positions of 2012: 40620 decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions of 2012: -18205 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 40620 to -18205 which gives add(40620, -18205), The final logic expression is add(40620, -18205). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the growth rate of the loews common stock from december 31 , 2004 to 2009 Context: the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ; ### Output: Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divide by the original amount The required values from the context for the question are: loews common stock of 2004 to 2009: 100.00, 135.92, 179.47, 219.01, 123.70, 160.62 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 160.62 by const_100 which gives divide(160.62, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(160.62, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(160.62, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the total research and development for the year 2014 through 2016 in millions Context: research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the sum of the research and development for the 3 year is the total The required values from the context for the question are: research and development expense for the years ended december 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014: $78 million, $119 million, $86 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 78 to 119 which gives add(78, 119) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 86 which gives add(add(78, 119), 86), The final logic expression is add(add(78, 119), 86). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage change in the weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis from 2016 to 2017 Context: the weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2017 is 1.24% ( 1.24 % ) ; the weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2016 is 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change in weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis ( 1.24-0.78 ) 0.78 The required values from the context for the question are: weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2017: 1.24% weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis of 2016: 0.78% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 0.78 from 1.24 which gives subtract(1.24, 0.78) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 0.78 which gives divide(subtract(1.24, 0.78), 0.78), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(1.24, 0.78), 0.78). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the increase in the unrecognized tax benefits observed during 2007 and 2008 , in millions of dollars? Context: the balance at december 27 2008 of december 27 2008 is $ 214.4 ; the balance at december 27 2008 of december 29 2007 is $ 126.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the final balance of tax benefits of each year . The required values from the context for the question are: balance at december 27 2008: $214.4 balance at december 29 2007: $126.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 126.6 from 214.4 which gives subtract(214.4, 126.6), The final logic expression is subtract(214.4, 126.6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: based on the fair value of the grant , how much money did the company lose when some of their grants were forfeited . Context: non-vested shares the forfeited of number of shares is -150 ( 150 ) ; the forfeited of weighted-average grant-date fair value is 23.44 ; the number of restricted stock units vested includes shares withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding requirements . ### Output: Logic: to find the answer one must multiple the average fair value of each grant by the amount of forfeited grants . The required values from the context for the question are: forfeited number of shares: -150 weighted-average grant-date fair value of forfeited: 23.44 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 23.44 by 150 which gives multiply(23.44, 150), The final logic expression is multiply(23.44, 150). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: based on the table , what would be the annual percent return for the companies investments? Context: the total deferred compensation plan investments 2014 short and long-term of 2010 is $ 8690 ; the total deferred compensation plan investments 2014 short and long-term of 2009 is $ 7943 ; the components of the investments as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 were as follows: . the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses . ### Output: Logic: to find the amount of percent gained one needs to subtract the two years . then take the answer and divide that by the number from 2009 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2010 investments: $8690 2009 investments: $7943 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7943 from 8690 which gives subtract(8690, 7943) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 7943 which gives divide(subtract(8690, 7943), 7943) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(8690, 7943), 7943), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(8690, 7943), 7943), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of future commitments for service , maintenance and other business enhancement capital expenditure contracts are paid in the first year to the third year? Context: the other ( 6 ) of total is 1381518 ; the other ( 6 ) of less than1 year is 248107 ; the other ( 6 ) of 1-3 years is 433161 ; the other ( 6 ) of 3-5 years is 354454 ; the other ( 6 ) of more than5 years is 345796 ; ( 6 ) other includes future commitments for service , maintenance and other business enhancement capital expenditure contracts . the total ( 7 ) of total is $ 15973855 ; the total ( 7 ) of less than1 year is $ 2143649 ; the total ( 7 ) of 1-3 years is $ 4915507 ; the total ( 7 ) of 3-5 years is $ 3610120 ; the total ( 7 ) of more than5 years is $ 5304579 ; ### Output: Logic: to find how much the the other payment was paid in the 1st year to the 3rd year one must divide the payments paid during this period by the total amount of payments . The required values from the context for the question are: Other (1-3 years): 433161 Other total: 1381518 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 433161 by 15973855 which gives divide(433161, 15973855) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(433161, 15973855), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(433161, 15973855), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much money did the company pay for the repurchase of shares on non-announced plans or programs? Context: period the total of total number ofshares purchased ( 1 ) is 1564746 ; the total of average price paidper share ( 2 ) is $ 110.17 ; the total of total number of sharespurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( 3 ) is 1482914 ; the total of approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans or programs is $ 2070927831 ; ( 3 ) shares repurchased pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced on august 12 , 2004 . ### Output: Logic: the way to find the amount the company spent on non-announced repurchases , one has to subtract the total amount of shares bought by the amount released to the public . then you would multiple the answer by the average purchase price of the total amount of shares . The required values from the context for the question are: Total number of shares purchased: 1564746 Announced plans shares purchased: 1482914 Average price per share: $110.17 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1482914 from 1564746 which gives subtract(1564746, 1482914) step 2: multiply 110.17 by the expression of step 1 which gives multiply(110.17, subtract(1564746, 1482914)), The final logic expression is multiply(110.17, subtract(1564746, 1482914)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: if the remaining securities would be use or exercised at $ 113.49 , what would cost be for the company? Context: principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item a014 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . plan category the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b ) is 1708928 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights is $ 113.49 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 3629455 ; ### Output: Logic: to find the answer to the question one must multiple the price by the remaining securities . The required values from the context for the question are: Number of securities: 3629455 Price per security: $113.49 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 113.49 by 3629455 which gives multiply(113.49, 3629455), The final logic expression is multiply(113.49, 3629455). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2011-2012 , what is the variation observed in the lease obligations? Context: in millions the lease obligations of 2010 is 177 ; the lease obligations of 2011 is 148 ; the lease obligations of 2012 is 124 ; the lease obligations of 2013 is 96 ; the lease obligations of 2014 is 79 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 184 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: Lease obligations 2011: 148 Lease obligations 2012: 124 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 124 from 148 which gives subtract(148, 124), The final logic expression is subtract(148, 124). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of the purchase was in cash? Context: cash portion of consideration the total estimated purchase price of $ 2094800 is $ 6156900 ; ( i ) purchase price the purchase price is as follows: . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage of the purchase was cash one must divide the amount in cash paid for the purchase by the total cost of the purchase . The required values from the context for the question are: Estimated purchase price: $2094800 Cash portion: $6156900 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2094800 by 6156900 which gives divide(2094800, 6156900) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2094800, 6156900), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2094800, 6156900), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2008 , how much percent did the board of directors increase the share repurchase program . Context: on august 21 , 2018 , the board of directors approved an increase to the current authorization for the stock repurchase program by an additional $ 2.0 billion to $ 8.2 billion in the aggregate . under the repurchase program , we may repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock froff m time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . ### Output: Logic: one can find out the answer by subtracting the new total from the amount that the board of directors raised the program by . then take the amount the board of directors raised the program by and divide that by the answer to the last step . The required values from the context for the question are: Increase in repurchase program: $2.0 billion New total repurchase program: $8.2 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_2 from 8.2 which gives subtract(8.2, const_2) step 2: divide const_2 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(const_2, subtract(8.2, const_2)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(const_2, subtract(8.2, const_2)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(const_2, subtract(8.2, const_2)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much did interest with libor change from year 1 to years 3-5? Context: the interest ( 5 ) of total is 974444 ; the interest ( 5 ) of less than1 year is 222427 ; the interest ( 5 ) of 1-3 years is 404380 ; the interest ( 5 ) of 3-5 years is 165172 ; the interest ( 5 ) of more than5 years is 182465 ; off-balance sheet transactions contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2018 , our contractual obligations with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year , including interest payments on long-term debt obligations , were as follows ( in thousands ) : less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years more than 5 years . ### Output: Logic: to find how much the interest rate changed one must subtract the interest from year 1 by the interest from years 3-5 . then divide the answer by the interest from year 1 . The required values from the context for the question are: Interest year 1: 222427 Interest years 3-5: 165172 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 222427 from 165172 which gives subtract(165172, 222427) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 222427 which gives divide(subtract(165172, 222427), 222427), The final logic expression is divide(subtract(165172, 222427), 222427). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2010-2011 , what is the percentual increase observed in the maturities of long-term debt? Context: in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 304 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 574 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2012 is $ 199 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2013 is $ 131 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 562 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 7263 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of 2011 divided by the 2010's , then turned into a percentage to represent the percentual growth . The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt 2010: $304 Long-term debt 2011: $574 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 574 by 304 which gives divide(574, 304) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(574, 304), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(574, 304), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(574, 304), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of long-term debt was paid off in 2021? Context: year the 2021 of amount is 2549621 ; year the total of amount is $ 6609866 ; principal and interest payments are payable semiannually . ### Output: Logic: to find the amount of long-term debt was paid off in 2021 , one has to take the payment in 2021 and divide it by the total amount of long-term debt payments . The required values from the context for the question are: 2021 amount: 2549621 Total amount: $6609866 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2549621 by 6609866 which gives divide(2549621, 6609866) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2549621, 6609866), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2549621, 6609866), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: during the purchase , what was the per share value of the hologic common stock Context: the aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 6156900 included $ 2094800 in cash ; 132038 shares of hologic common stock at an estimated fair value of $ 3671500 ; 16465 of fully vested stock options granted to cytyc employees in exchange for their vested cytyc stock options , with an estimated fair value of approximately $ 241400 ; the fair value of cytyc 2019s outstanding convertible notes assumed in the merger of approximately $ 125000 ; and approximately $ 24200 of direct acquisition costs . ### Output: Logic: to find the per share value of the stock one must divide the cost of the shares by the total number of shares purchased . The required values from the context for the question are: Purchase price of common stock: $3671500 Number of shares: 132038 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 3671500 by 132038 which gives divide(3671500, 132038), The final logic expression is divide(3671500, 132038). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percentage of warehouse locations are in north america? Context: in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan . in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan . ### Output: Logic: the increase would be 21.3% because 16 ( number of north american warehouses ) divided by the total amount of warehouses . The required values from the context for the question are: Total warehouse locations: 75 Warehouse locations in North America: 16 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 16 by 75 which gives divide(16, 75) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(16, 75), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(16, 75), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage reduction in the loews common stock from 2013 to 2014 Context: the loews common stock of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews common stock of 2011 is 97.37 ; the loews common stock of 2012 is 106.04 ; the loews common stock of 2013 is 126.23 ; the loews common stock of 2014 is 110.59 ; the loews common stock of 2015 is 101.72 ; ### Output: Logic: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the first period The required values from the context for the question are: Loews common stock in 2013: 126.23 Loews common stock in 2014: 110.59 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 126.23 from 110.59 which gives subtract(110.59, 126.23) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 126.23 which gives divide(subtract(110.59, 126.23), 126.23) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(110.59, 126.23), 126.23), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(110.59, 126.23), 126.23), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2009 , what is the percentage of the segment's operating income among the total operating income? Context: years ended december 31 , the segment operating income of 2009 is 203 ; the segment operating income of 2008 is 208 ; the segment operating income of 2007 is 180 ; operating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 . ### Output: Logic: it is the operating income of the segment divided by the total , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment operating income in 2009: 203 Total operating income in 2009: 900 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 203 by 900 which gives divide(203, 900) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(203, 900), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(203, 900), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the reverse stock split , what was the percentual reduction of the common stock outstanding shares? Context: the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . ### Output: Logic: it is the new number of shares divided by the total , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage , which is going to represent the reduction . The required values from the context for the question are: Number of shares before reverse stock split: 1.3 billion Number of shares after reverse stock split: 0.4 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 0.4 by 1.3 which gives divide(0.4, 1.3) step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from const_1 which gives subtract(const_1, divide(0.4, 1.3)) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(const_1, divide(0.4, 1.3)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(const_1, divide(0.4, 1.3)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what is the decrease observed in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans? Context: during 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the final value of cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments minus the initial one , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash contributions & benefit payments in 2016: $137.5 Cash contributions & benefit payments in 2015: $79.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 137.5 from 79.3 which gives subtract(79.3, 137.5) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 137.5 which gives divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the square feet in owned facilities in other countries? Context: ( square feet in millions ) the owned facilities1 of unitedstates is 29.9 ; the owned facilities1 of othercountries is 16.7 ; the owned facilities1 of total is 46.6 ; ### Output: Logic: 35.8% of the square feet in owned facilities in other countries? The required values from the context for the question are: Square feet in owned facilities in other countries: 16.7 million Total square feet in owned facilities: 46.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 16.7 by 46.6 which gives divide(16.7, 46.6) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(16.7, 46.6), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(16.7, 46.6), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the cash flow result? Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2019 is $ 2969.9 ; the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2547.2 ; cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2019 is -2113.4 ( 2113.4 ) ; the investing activities of 2018 is -1641.6 ( 1641.6 ) ; cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2019 is -1370.5 ( 1370.5 ) ; the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the cash provided by all activities , but considering the investing and financial ones as negative values . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash flow from operating activities in 2018: $2547.2 Cash flow from investing activities in 2018: -$1641.6 Cash flow from financing activities in 2018: -$1359.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1641.6 from 2547.2 which gives subtract(2547.2, 1641.6) step 2: subtract 1359.8 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(subtract(2547.2, 1641.6), 1359.8), The final logic expression is subtract(subtract(2547.2, 1641.6), 1359.8). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation between the average and the highest operating margin? Context: years ended december 31 the operating margin of 2014 is 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 7.8% ( 7.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between the maximum and average values . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating margin in 2014: 11.4% Operating margin in 2013: 7.8% Operating margin in 2012: 7.4% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract table_average(operating margin, none) from table_max(operating margin, none) which gives subtract(table_max(operating margin, none), table_average(operating margin, none)) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(table_max(operating margin, none), table_average(operating margin, none)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(table_max(operating margin, none), table_average(operating margin, none)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how many total votes can the class b-3 provide in 2017? Context: ( in thousands ) the class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2017 is 1.3 ; the class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2016 is 1.3 ; each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share . ### Output: Logic: its the result of the multiplication between the number of class b-3 shares ( 1300 ) and the number of votes provided by each one . The required values from the context for the question are: Class b-3 common stock in 2017: 1.3 thousand Votes per class b-3 common stock: 1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply const_1000 by 1.3 which gives multiply(const_1000, 1.3) step 2: multiply const_1 by the expression of step 1 which gives multiply(const_1, multiply(const_1000, 1.3)), The final logic expression is multiply(const_1, multiply(const_1000, 1.3)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the estimated percentual decrease observed in the htm investment securities from 2017 to 2018 ? . Context: as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the htm investment securities ( period-end ) of 2018 is 31434 ; the htm investment securities ( period-end ) of 2017 is 47733 ; the htm investment securities ( period-end ) of 2016 is 50168 ; ### Output: Logic: its the percentage of the decrease ( the value's variation between 2018 and 2017 ) . The required values from the context for the question are: HTM investment securities in 2018: 31434 HTM investment securities in 2017: 47733 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 31434 from 47733 which gives subtract(47733, 31434) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 47733 which gives divide(subtract(47733, 31434), 47733) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(47733, 31434), 47733), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(47733, 31434), 47733), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio? Context: the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 400.6 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; the operating income of 2011 is 62.8 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of sales divided by the operating income . The required values from the context for the question are: Sales in 2013: $451.1 Operating income in 2013: 65.5 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 451.1 by 65.5 which gives divide(451.1, 65.5), The final logic expression is divide(451.1, 65.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest segment operating income? Context: years ended december 31 , the segment operating income of 2009 is 900 ; the segment operating income of 2008 is 846 ; the segment operating income of 2007 is 954 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum operating income . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment operating income in 2009: 900 Segment operating income in 2008: 846 Segment operating income in 2007: 954 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(segment operating income, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the growth of the additions in comparison with the growth of the deductions during 2003 and 2004? Context: balance december 31 2002 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 450697000 is 68125000 ; balance december 31 2002 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 450697000 is -4645000 ( 4645000 ) ; balance december 31 2002 the additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense of $ 450697000 is 82551000 ; balance december 31 2002 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 450697000 is -1390000 ( 1390000 ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between each percentual variation during 2003 and 2004 . The required values from the context for the question are: Additions during 2003: $68125000 Deductions during 2003: $-4645000 Additions during 2004: $82551000 Deductions during 2004: $-1390000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1390000 by 4645000 which gives divide(1390000, 4645000) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1) step 3: divide 82551000 by 68125000 which gives divide(82551000, 68125000) step 4: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 3 which gives subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1) step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1), subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1)) step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1), subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1), subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what are the total amount of net tangible assets obtained through the acquisition? Context: cash the goodwill of $ 45826 is 203828 ; cash the total purchase consideration of $ 45826 is $ 265982 ; goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets . ### Output: Logic: the net total amount of assets that were tangible in the acquisition , can be found by subtracting the total amount of money spent by the goodwill or intangible assets . The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill: $203.8 million Total purchase consideration: $265982 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 203828 from 265982 which gives subtract(265982, 203828), The final logic expression is subtract(265982, 203828). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2016 , what was the percentual increase in the high sale price observed during the first and second quarters? Context: quarter the first of 2016 high is $ 30.66 ; the first of 2016 low is $ 18.42 ; the first of 2016 dividend is $ 0.09 ; the first of 2016 high is $ 51.30 ; the first of 2016 low is $ 37.95 ; the first of dividend is $ 0.09 ; quarter the second of 2016 high is 34.50 ; the second of 2016 low is 26.34 ; the second of 2016 dividend is 0.09 ; the second of 2016 high is 42.87 ; the second of 2016 low is 33.45 ; the second of dividend is 0.09 ; the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . ### Output: Logic: it is the high sale price of the second quarter divided by the high sale price of the first one , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: High sale price first quarter 2016: $30.66 and $51.30 (There seems to be two values provided for the high sale price in the first quarter. This discrepancy needs to be addressed.) High sale price second quarter 2016: $34.50 and $42.87 (Again, two values provided) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 34.50 by 30.66 which gives divide(34.50, 30.66) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(34.50, 30.66), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(34.50, 30.66), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(34.50, 30.66), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components Context: the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointincrease is $ 7367 ; the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointdecrease is $ -5974 ( 5974 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components is the sum of 7367 and -5974 equal to 1393 The required values from the context for the question are: One-percentage-point increase effect: $7367 One-percentage-point decrease effect: $-5974 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 7367 to -5974 which gives add(7367, -5974), The final logic expression is add(7367, -5974). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the variation between the capital expenditures on a gaap basis and the one on a non-gaap basis? Context: the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1682.2 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1747.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2559.8 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1885.1 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1996.7 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2778.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between each capital expenditures value , concerning gaap or non-gaap basis . The required values from the context for the question are: Capital expenditures on a GAAP basis 2014: $1682.2 Capital expenditures on a non-GAAP basis 2014: $1885.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 1682.2 from 1885.1 which gives subtract(1885.1, 1682.2), The final logic expression is subtract(1885.1, 1682.2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the fair market value of plan assets in 2018 , what is its estimated return for 10 years? Context: the weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets of 2018 is 6.9% ( 6.9 % ) ; the weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets of 2017 is 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) ; the weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets of 2016 is 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) ; the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2018 measurement date decreased to $ 4273.1 from $ 4409.2 at the end of fiscal year 2017 . ### Output: Logic: it is the fair value calculated in the compound interest formula , in which the rate of return on plan assets is the interest rate and the 10 years is the period . The required values from the context for the question are: Expected rate of return on plan assets 2018: 6.9% Fair market value of plan assets 2018: $4273.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 4273.1 by exp(add(const_1, divide(6.9%, const_100)), 10) which gives multiply(4273.1, exp(add(const_1, divide(6.9%, const_100)), 10)), The final logic expression is multiply(4273.1, exp(add(const_1, divide(6.9%, const_100)), 10)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of assets acquired by the acquisition are non-tangible assets? Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the customer-related intangible assets of total is 4091 ; the contract-based intangible assets of total is 1031 ; the property and equipment of total is 267 ; the other current assets of total is 502 ; the total assets acquired of total is 19427 ; the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : . ### Output: Logic: the non-tangible assets are considered customer-related intangible assets , goodwill , and contract-based intangible assets . to get to the answer , one must add up these 3 numbers and divide the total by the total assets.\n The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill: $13536 Customer-related intangible assets: $4091 Contract-based intangible assets: $1031 Total assets acquired: $19427 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 13536 to 4091 which gives add(13536, 4091) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1031 which gives add(add(13536, 4091), 1031) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 19427 which gives divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the return on total assets during 2013? Context: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2017 is 479 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2016 is 573 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2015 is 404 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2014 is 338 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 is 261 ; ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total assets of year ended december 31 2017 is 6374 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2016 is 6352 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2015 is 6024 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2014 is 6239 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2013 is 6190 ; ### Output: Logic: net income over total assets The required values from the context for the question are: Net earnings 2013: $261 Total assets 2013: $6190 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 261 by 6190 which gives divide(261, 6190) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(261, 6190), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(261, 6190), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what percent of assets acquired by the acquisition are non-tangible assets? Context: the goodwill of total is $ 13536 ; the customer-related intangible assets of total is 4091 ; the contract-based intangible assets of total is 1031 ; the property and equipment of total is 267 ; the other current assets of total is 502 ; the total assets acquired of total is 19427 ; the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : . ### Output: Logic: the non-tangible assets are considered customer-related intangible assets , goodwill , and contract-based intangible assets . to get to the answer , one must add up these 3 numbers and divide the total by the total assets.\\n The required values from the context for the question are: Goodwill: $13536 Customer-related intangible assets: $4091 Contract-based intangible assets: $1031 Total assets acquired: $19427 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 13536 to 4091 which gives add(13536, 4091) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 1031 which gives add(add(13536, 4091), 1031) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 19427 which gives divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(add(13536, 4091), 1031), 19427), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the gaap basis , what was the growth observed in the effective tax rate during 2012 and 2013? Context: 2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between these effective tax rates during 2012 and 2013 . The required values from the context for the question are: Effective tax rate 2012 on a GAAP basis: 22.8% Effective tax rate 2013 on a GAAP basis: 21.9% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 21.9% from 22.8% which gives subtract(22.8%, 21.9%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(22.8%, 21.9%), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(22.8%, 21.9%), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the percentual increase observed in the payment amount per share? Context: paymentdate the 2016 of amountper share is $ 1.16 ; the 2016 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 172 ; paymentdate the 2017 of amountper share is $ 1.49 ; the 2017 of totalamount ( in millions ) is $ 216 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the payment amount per share in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Payment amount per share 2016: $1.16 Payment amount per share 2017: $1.49 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1.49 by 1.16 which gives divide(1.49, 1.16) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(1.49, 1.16), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1.49, 1.16), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1.49, 1.16), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentual increase of other income due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements in 2011? Context: 2011 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.1 increased $ 5.4 , primarily due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements from government grants for expense , partially offset by lower gains from the sale of assets . ### Output: Logic: it is the income variation divided by the initial income in the year 2011 . The required values from the context for the question are: 2011 other income (expense): $47.1 Increase: $5.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 5.4 by 47.1 which gives divide(5.4, 47.1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(5.4, 47.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(5.4, 47.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2017 what was the debt to equity based on the 2017 actual asset allocation Context: the debt securities of targetassetallocation is 72% ( 72 % ) ; the debt securities of 2017actualassetallocation is 70% ( 70 % ) ; the debt securities of 2016actualassetallocation is 72% ( 72 % ) ; the equity securities of targetassetallocation is 28 ; the equity securities of 2017actualassetallocation is 30 ; the equity securities of 2016actualassetallocation is 28 ; ### Output: Logic: the debt to equity is the ratio of the debts that show how much the company borrows compared to internal financing The required values from the context for the question are: 2017 actual asset allocation (debt securities): 70% (70%) 2017 actual asset allocation (equity securities): 30 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 70 by 30 which gives divide(70, 30), The final logic expression is divide(70, 30). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the overall growth of the s&p 500 index from 2010 to 2015 Context: the s&p 500 index of 2010 is 100.0 ; the s&p 500 index of 2011 is 102.11 ; the s&p 500 index of 2012 is 118.45 ; the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 156.82 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 178.29 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 180.75 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2011 is 101.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2012 is 115.19 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2013 is 145.12 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2014 is 152.84 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2015 is 144.70 ; ### Output: Logic: to test for growth you divide the change by the earliest amount The required values from the context for the question are: s&p 500 index 2010: 100.0 s&p 500 index 2015: 180.75 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100.0 from 180.75 which gives subtract(180.75, 100.0) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives divide(subtract(180.75, 100.0), const_100) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(180.75, 100.0), const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(180.75, 100.0), const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average of the afs investment securities during the years 2016-2018? Context: as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the afs investment securities ( period-end ) of 2018 is 228681 ; the afs investment securities ( period-end ) of 2017 is 200247 ; the afs investment securities ( period-end ) of 2016 is 236670 ; ### Output: Logic: its the average of afs investment securities during those 3 years . The required values from the context for the question are: AFS investment securities 2018: 228681 AFS investment securities 2017: 200247 AFS investment securities 2016: 236670 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 228681 to 200247 which gives add(228681, 200247) step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 236670 which gives add(add(228681, 200247), 236670) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(add(228681, 200247), 236670), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(add(228681, 200247), 236670), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average price per share of the company 2019s common stock in the third quarter of 2016? Context: quarter the third of 2016 high is 32.91 ; the third of 2016 low is 27.09 ; the third of 2016 dividend is 0.09 ; the third of 2016 high is 33.69 ; the third of 2016 low is 23.91 ; the third of dividend is 0.09 ; the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the high sale price and the low sale price divided by two . The required values from the context for the question are: Third quarter 2016 high: 32.91 Third quarter 2016 low: 27.09 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 32.91 to 27.09 which gives add(32.91, 27.09) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(32.91, 27.09), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(32.91, 27.09), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year during 2005 and 2004? Context: balance december 31 2002 the balance december 31 2004 of $ 450697000 is 595338000 ; balance december 31 2002 the balance december 31 2005 of $ 450697000 is $ 663750000 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the percentual increase observed during this period , which is calculated by dividing the final value ( balance at 2005 ) by the initial value ( balance of 2004 ) , then subtracting 1 and turning it into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Balance December 31 2004: 595338000 Balance December 31 2005: $663750000 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 663750000 by 595338000 which gives divide(663750000, 595338000) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(663750000, 595338000), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(663750000, 595338000), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(663750000, 595338000), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the value of the treasury stock as of december 312007 Context: the december 1 through december 31 of number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) is 14669 ; the december 1 through december 31 of average price per share is $ 43.89 ; ### Output: Logic: the value of the treasury stock is the amount of shares bought back at the given price The required values from the context for the question are: Number of shares repurchased (December): 14669 Average price per share (December): $43.89 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 14669 by 43.89 which gives multiply(14669, 43.89), The final logic expression is multiply(14669, 43.89). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: on december 312013 what was the net profit margin Context: the net income of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is 2526 ; the revenue of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is $ 40678 ; ### Output: Logic: the net profit margin the ratio of the net income to the revenues The required values from the context for the question are: Net income December 31 2013: 2526 Revenue December 31 2013: $40678 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2526 by 40678 which gives divide(2526, 40678) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2526, 40678), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(2526, 40678), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the state of minnesota , what is the percentage of commercial/industrial customers concerning the total customers? Context: the minnesota of residential is 738868 ; the minnesota of commercial/industrial is 67489 ; the minnesota of total customers is 806357 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of commercial/industrial customers divided by the total number of customers in minnesota . The required values from the context for the question are: Minnesota residential customers: 738868 Minnesota commercial/industrial customers: 67489 Minnesota total customers: 806357 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 67489 by 806357 which gives divide(67489, 806357) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(67489, 806357), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(67489, 806357), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what were net trading assets from derivatives in 2012 , in millions? Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2013 is 72629 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2012 is 85744 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2011 is 90003 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2013 is 64553 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2012 is 76162 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2011 is 71539 ; ### Output: Logic: net = assets minus liab . The required values from the context for the question are: Trading assets 2012 derivative receivables: 85744 Trading liabilities 2012 derivative payables: 76162 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 76162 from 85744 which gives subtract(85744, 76162), The final logic expression is subtract(85744, 76162). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the current ratio? Context: current assets the current assets of $ 28.1 is $ 28.1 ; current assets the current liabilities assumed of $ 28.1 is -32.9 ( 32.9 ) ; ### Output: Logic: current ratio = current assets/current liabilities . it says it is invalid but ( ) means - The required values from the context for the question are: Current assets: $28.1 Current liabilities: -32.9 (32.9) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 28.1 by -32.9 which gives divide(28.1, -32.9), The final logic expression is divide(28.1, -32.9). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the lowest interest incurred observed? Context: the interest incurred of 2016 is $ 148.4 ; the interest incurred of 2015 is $ 152.6 ; the interest incurred of 2014 is $ 158.1 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value of interest incurred observed during these years . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 interest incurred: $148.4 2015 interest incurred: $152.6 2014 interest incurred: $158.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_min(interest incurred, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the operating margin for 2012? Context: the sales of 2014 is $ 450.4 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the operating income of 2014 is 88.2 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2012 , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2012 sales: $420.1 2012 operating income: 44.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 44.6 by 420.1 which gives divide(44.6, 420.1) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(44.6, 420.1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(44.6, 420.1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average cash provided by the operating activities during 2018 and 2019? Context: cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2019 is $ 2969.9 ; the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2547.2 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of the operating activities of 2018 and 2019 divided by two ( the number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: 2019 operating activities: $2969.9 2018 operating activities: $2547.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(operating activities, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the combined number of equity compensation plans approved by security holders Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 448859 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights is $ 0.00 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4087587 ; ### Output: Logic: the combined number is the sum of the two numbers of securities The required values from the context for the question are: Number of securities (a) (b): 448859 Number of securities (c): 4087587 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 448859 to 4087587 which gives add(448859, 4087587), The final logic expression is add(448859, 4087587). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2012 , how bigger is the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis than the one on a gaap basis? Context: the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1682.2 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1747.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2559.8 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2014 is $ 1885.1 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1996.7 ; the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2778.3 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis divided by the one on a gaap basis , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: 2012 capital expenditures (GAAP): $2559.8 2012 capital expenditures (non-GAAP): $2778.3 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 2778.3 by 2559.8 which gives divide(2778.3, 2559.8) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(2778.3, 2559.8), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(2778.3, 2559.8), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(2778.3, 2559.8), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2019 , what is the contribution of the first quarter in the total dividend? Context: the first quarter of 2019 is $ 1.10 ; the first quarter of 2018 is $ .95 ; the total of 2019 is $ 4.58 ; the total of 2018 is $ 4.25 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the first quarter dividend divided by the total value of all dividends , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: First quarter 2019: $1.10 Total 2019: $4.58 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1.10 by 4.58 which gives divide(1.10, 4.58) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.10, 4.58), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.10, 4.58), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the anticipated amount of revenues from the of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 in billions Context: we expect approximately 28% ( 28 % ) of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 . ### Output: Logic: given the percent to obtain the amount you multiply the percent by the total The required values from the context for the question are: 28% of $21 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 21 by 28% which gives multiply(21, 28%), The final logic expression is multiply(21, 28%). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the highest interest expense observed? Context: the interest expense of 2016 is $ 115.5 ; the interest expense of 2015 is $ 103.5 ; the interest expense of 2014 is $ 125.1 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value of the interest expense observed during these years . The required values from the context for the question are: 2016 interest expense: $115.5 2015 interest expense: $103.5 2014 interest expense: $125.1 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(interest expense, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the first quarter dividend percentage concerning the total value , during 2018 and 2019? Context: the first quarter of 2019 is $ 1.10 ; the first quarter of 2018 is $ .95 ; the total of 2019 is $ 4.58 ; the total of 2018 is $ 4.25 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between those percentages , which are calculated by dividing the value of the first quarter divided by the total value of dividends . The required values from the context for the question are: First quarter 2019: $1.10 First quarter 2018: $.95 Total 2019: $4.58 Total 2018: $4.25 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide .95 by 4.25 which gives divide(.95, 4.25) step 2: divide 1.10 by 4.58 which gives divide(1.10, 4.58) step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25)) step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25)), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25)), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in millions for 2013 , what were net trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments? Context: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2013 is $ 340449 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2012 is $ 349337 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2011 is $ 393890 ; year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) of 2013 is 77706 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) of 2012 is 69001 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) of 2011 is 81916 ; ### Output: Logic: net - assets minus liab . The required values from the context for the question are: 2013 trading assets (debt and equity instruments): $340449 2013 trading liabilities (debt and equity instruments): 77706 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 77706 from 340449 which gives subtract(340449, 77706), The final logic expression is subtract(340449, 77706). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the mathematical range for european cruise guests from 2010-2014? Context: year the 2010 of weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) is 391000 ; the 2010 of royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths is 92300 ; the 2010 of globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) is 18800000 ; the 2010 of north americancruiseguests ( 2 ) is 10781000 ; the 2010 of europeancruiseguests ( 3 ) is 5540000 ; year the 2014 of weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) is 448000 ; the 2014 of royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths is 105750 ; the 2014 of globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) is 22006063 ; the 2014 of north americancruiseguests ( 2 ) is 12260238 ; the 2014 of europeancruiseguests ( 3 ) is 6535365 ; total berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) . ### Output: Logic: largest number - smallest number in group The required values from the context for the question are: 2010 European cruise guests: 5540000 2014 European cruise guests: 6535365 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 5540000 from 6535365 which gives subtract(6535365, 5540000), The final logic expression is subtract(6535365, 5540000). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the increase observed in the total revenue during 2010 and 2011? Context: years ended december 31 the total revenue of 2011 is $ 11287 ; the total revenue of 2010 is $ 8512 ; the total revenue of 2009 is $ 7595 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the total revenue of 2011 divided by the 2010's , then transformed into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Total revenue 2011: $11287 Total revenue 2010: $8512 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 11287 by 8512 which gives divide(11287, 8512) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(11287, 8512), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(11287, 8512), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(11287, 8512), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the ratio of the acquisition related costs recognized in 2015 to 2014 Context: simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements . the company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively . ### Output: Logic: the ratio of the acquisition related costs for 2015 to 2014 was 0.75 to 1 The required values from the context for the question are: Acquisition related costs 03/31/2015: $0.6 million Acquisition related costs 12/31/2014: $0.8 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 0.6 by 0.8 which gives divide(0.6, 0.8), The final logic expression is divide(0.6, 0.8). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest segment operating income margin? Context: years ended december 31 , the segment operating income margin of 2009 is 16.0% ( 16.0 % ) ; the segment operating income margin of 2008 is 15.3% ( 15.3 % ) ; the segment operating income margin of 2007 is 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value of the segment operating income margin . The required values from the context for the question are: Segment operating income margin 2009: 16.0% Segment operating income margin 2008: 15.3% Segment operating income margin 2007: 13.4% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply table_min(segment operating income margin, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_min(segment operating income margin, none), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(table_min(segment operating income margin, none), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the short-term debt as a percent of total debt? Context: 30 september the short-term borrowings of 2016 is $ 935.8 ; the short-term borrowings of 2015 is $ 1494.3 ; 30 september the current portion of long-term debt of 2016 is 371.3 ; the current portion of long-term debt of 2015 is 435.6 ; 30 september the total debt of 2016 is $ 6225.2 ; the total debt of 2015 is $ 5879.0 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all short-term debts divided by the total debt and turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Short-term borrowings 2016: $935.8 Total debt 2016: $6225.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 935.8 to 371.3 which gives add(935.8, 371.3) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 6225.2 which gives divide(add(935.8, 371.3), 6225.2) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(935.8, 371.3), 6225.2), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(add(935.8, 371.3), 6225.2), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the operating margin for 2014? Context: the sales of 2014 is $ 450.4 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the operating income of 2014 is 88.2 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2014 , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Sales 2014: $450.4 Operating income 2014: 88.2 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 88.2 by 450.4 which gives divide(88.2, 450.4) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(88.2, 450.4), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(88.2, 450.4), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the highest value for total operating segments during this period? Context: years ended december 31 the total operating segments of 2011 is 11287 ; the total operating segments of 2010 is 8512 ; the total operating segments of 2009 is 7546 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the maximum value . The required values from the context for the question are: Total operating segments 2011: 11287 Total operating segments 2010: 8512 Total operating segments 2009: 7546 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_max(total operating segments, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentual increase in the operating expenses during 2017 and 2018? Context: the pension expense 2013 continuing operations of 2018 is $ 91.8 ; the pension expense 2013 continuing operations of 2017 is $ 72.0 ; the pension expense 2013 continuing operations of 2016 is $ 55.8 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the final value of the operating expenses in 2018 divided by the 2017's , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Pension expense 2018: $91.8 Pension expense 2017: $72.0 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 91.8 by 72.0 which gives divide(91.8, 72.0) step 2: subtract const_1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(91.8, 72.0), const_1) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(91.8, 72.0), const_1), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(91.8, 72.0), const_1), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2011-2013 , what is the average capital expenditure on a gaap basis? Context: the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2013 is $ 1747.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2012 is $ 2559.8 ; the capital expenditures on a gaap basis of 2011 is $ 1365.9 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all capital expenditures on a gaap basis divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: Capital expenditures (GAAP basis) 2013: $1747.8 Capital expenditures (GAAP basis) 2012: $2559.8 Capital expenditures (GAAP basis) 2011: $1365.9 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(capital expenditures on a gaap basis, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the number of shares outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 Context: as of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record . the december 1 through december 31 of number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) is 14669 ; the december 1 through december 31 of average price per share is $ 43.89 ; ### Output: Logic: the outstanding common stock is the stock less and repurchase The required values from the context for the question are: Common stock outstanding 02/15/2008: 138311810 shares Number of shares repurchased December 2007: 14669 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 14669 from 138311810 which gives subtract(138311810, 14669), The final logic expression is subtract(138311810, 14669). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percent of the total backlog for ingalls as part of the total backlog Context: ( $ in millions ) the ingalls of december 31 2014 funded is $ 5609 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 1889 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 total backlog is $ 7498 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 funded is $ 6335 ; the ingalls of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 2570 ; the ingalls of total backlog is $ 8905 ; ( $ in millions ) the total backlog of december 31 2014 funded is $ 11832 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 9598 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 total backlog is $ 21430 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 funded is $ 11830 ; the total backlog of december 31 2014 unfunded is $ 6208 ; the total backlog of total backlog is $ 18038 ; ### Output: Logic: to get the percent you divide the amount in question by the total and multiply by 100 The required values from the context for the question are: Ingalls backlog 12/31/2014: $7498 Total backlog 12/31/2014: $21430 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 8905 by 18038 which gives divide(8905, 18038) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(8905, 18038), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(8905, 18038), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what was the average cash paid for interest? Context: cash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. . ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all cash paid for interest during these years divided by three ( number of years ) . The required values from the context for the question are: Cash paid for interest 2016: $121.1 Cash paid for interest 2015: $97.5 Cash paid for interest 2014: $132.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 121.1 to 97.5 which gives add(121.1, 97.5) step 2: add 132.4 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(132.4, add(121.1, 97.5)) step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by const_3 which gives divide(add(132.4, add(121.1, 97.5)), const_3), The final logic expression is divide(add(132.4, add(121.1, 97.5)), const_3). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: in 2009 what was the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts Context: the additions charged to expense of 2009 is 27.3 ; the additions charged to expense of 2008 is 36.5 ; the additions charged to expense of 2007 is 3.9 ; the accounts written-off of 2009 is -37.8 ( 37.8 ) ; the accounts written-off of 2008 is -12.7 ( 12.7 ) ; the accounts written-off of 2007 is -7.8 ( 7.8 ) ; ### Output: Logic: the change is the difference in the amounts for the specified periods The required values from the context for the question are: Additions charged to expense of 2009: 27.3 Accounts written-off of 2009: -37.8 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 27.3 to -37.8 which gives add(27.3, -37.8), The final logic expression is add(27.3, -37.8). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much did the lease obligations drop from 2004 to 2011? Context: ( in millions ) the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is 2328 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is 351 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is 281 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is 209 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is 178 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011 is 158 ; the lease obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is 1151 ; at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . ( in millions ) the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is 1035 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is 326 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is 120 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is 26 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is 12 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011 is 12 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is 539 ; ### Output: Logic: the lease obligations for 2004 are given in line 13 . to find the difference take the lease obligations for 2004 and subtract lease obligations for 2011 . The required values from the context for the question are: Lease obligations of 2004 (given as future obligations at the end of 2006): 2.3 billion Lease obligations of 2011: 158 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 120 from 205 which gives subtract(205, 120), The final logic expression is subtract(205, 120). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the state of arkansas , what is the percentage of residential customers concerning the total customers? Context: the arkansas of residential is 390668 ; the arkansas of commercial/industrial is 48033 ; the arkansas of total customers is 438701 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the number of residential customers divided by the total number of customers in arkansas . The required values from the context for the question are: Arkansas residential customers: 390668 Arkansas total customers: 438701 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 390668 by 438701 which gives divide(390668, 438701) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(390668, 438701), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(390668, 438701), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2013 and 2014 , what is the basis point variation observed in the operating margin? Context: years ended december 31 the operating margin of 2014 is 11.4% ( 11.4 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 7.8% ( 7.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those operating margins , then multiplied by 100 to transform into a basis point . The required values from the context for the question are: Operating margin of 2014: 11.4% Operating margin of 2013: 7.8% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7.8% from 11.4% which gives subtract(11.4%, 7.8%) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by const_100 which gives multiply(subtract(11.4%, 7.8%), const_100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(11.4%, 7.8%), const_100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2015 , what was the lowest return for the investment? Context: the allegion plc of november 18 2013 is 100.00 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2013 is 91.16 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2014 is 115.11 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2015 is 137.71 ; the allegion plc of december 31 2016 is 134.67 ; the s&p 500 of november 18 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2013 is 103.44 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2014 is 117.59 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2015 is 119.22 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2016 is 133.48 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of november 18 2013 is 100.00 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2013 is 105.46 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2014 is 105.72 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2015 is 99.90 ; the s&p 400 capital goods of december 31 2016 is 131.80 ; performance graph the annual changes for the period shown november 18 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading in the ""when-issued"" market ) to december 31 , 2016 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( ""s&p 500"" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( ""s&p 400 capital goods"" ) on november 18 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested . ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value of the investment in that year . The required values from the context for the question are: Allegion plc of December 31, 2015: 137.71 S&P 500 of December 31, 2015: 119.22 S&P 400 Capital Goods of December 31, 2015: 99.90 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 100 from 99.90 which gives subtract(99.90, 100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(99.90, 100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(99.90, 100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of the common stock repurchase among the total program of repurchases? Context: on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of the common stock repurchases divided by the total value of the program , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Common stock repurchase: $1.5 billion Total repurchase program: $2.25 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1.5 by 2.25 which gives divide(1.5, 2.25) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.5, 2.25), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.5, 2.25), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of decrease of long-term debt from 2007 to 2011? Context: ( in millions ) the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) total is $ 4134 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007 is $ 1340 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008 is $ 198 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009 is $ 4 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010 is $ 534 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011 is $ 607 ; the long-term debt obligations of payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter is $ 1451 ; contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . ### Output: Logic: the decrease of long term debt from 2007 to 2011 was 54.7% . this was calculated by subtracting 2007 from 2011 long term debt . then taking the answer and dividing it by the long term debt of 2007 . The required values from the context for the question are: Long-term debt obligations of 2007: $1340 million Long-term debt obligations of 2011: $607 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 607 from 1340 which gives subtract(1340, 607) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1340 which gives divide(subtract(1340, 607), 1340) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(1340, 607), 1340), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(1340, 607), 1340), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: as of december 312012 what was the outstanding amount of share repurchase authorized in billions? Context: schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . ### Output: Logic: the outstanding amount is the amount authorized less the amount repurchased The required values from the context for the question are: Share repurchased as of December 31, 2012: $7.12 billion Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 7.12 from const_8 which gives subtract(const_8, 7.12), The final logic expression is subtract(const_8, 7.12). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the 2016's special terminations settlements and curtailments , what is the percentage of pension settlement losses concerning the total value? Context: the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2016 is 7.3 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2015 is 35.2 ; the special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above ) of 2014 is 5.8 ; special items of $ 7.3 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , special termination benefits of $ 2.0 , and curtailment gains of $ 1.1 . ### Output: Logic: it is the pension settlement losses value divided by the total special terminations settlements and curtailments , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Special terminations settlements and curtailments of 2016: 7.3 Pension settlement losses of 2016: 6.4 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 6.4 by 7.3 which gives divide(6.4, 7.3) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(6.4, 7.3), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(6.4, 7.3), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how much money can the company deduct on the income tax in the future after this acquisition? Context: cash the customer-related intangible assets of $ 45826 is 42721 ; cash the acquired technology of $ 45826 is 27954 ; cash the trade name of $ 45826 is 2901 ; goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets . goodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years . the trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years . ### Output: Logic: the amortized acquired assets would be considered deductible assets . therefore to figure out the total amount of money they can deduct one must added the the amortized assets worth together . The required values from the context for the question are: customer-related intangible assets: $45826 acquired technology: $45826 trade name: $45826 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 27954 to 42721 which gives add(27954, 42721) step 2: add 2901 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(2901, add(27954, 42721)), The final logic expression is add(2901, add(27954, 42721)). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: how many class a common stocks issued and outstanding were issued between 2016 and 2017 in thousands? Context: ( in thousands ) the class a common stock issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2017 is 339235 ; the class a common stock issued and outstanding of december 31 , 2016 is 338240 ; ### Output: Logic: its the difference between those two years in class a common stocks issued and outstanding The required values from the context for the question are: class a common stock (2017): 339235 (in thousands) class a common stock (2016): 338240 (in thousands) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 338240 from 339235 which gives subtract(339235, 338240), The final logic expression is subtract(339235, 338240). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio? Context: the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 400.6 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; the operating income of 2011 is 62.8 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the value of sales divided by the operating income . The required values from the context for the question are: sales (2012): $420.1 operating income (2012): 44.6 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 420.1 by 44.6 which gives divide(420.1, 44.6), The final logic expression is divide(420.1, 44.6). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average segment revenue , in millions? Context: years ended december 31 , the segment revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ; the segment revenue of 2008 is $ 6197 ; the segment revenue of 2007 is $ 5918 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all revenue divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: segment revenue (2009): $6305 segment revenue (2008): $6197 segment revenue (2007): $5918 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(segment revenue, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: based on the information provided what is the ratio of the post retirement benefit obligation to the service and interest one-point percentage increase Context: the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-pointincrease is $ 72238 ; the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation of one-percentage-pointdecrease is $ -60261 ( 60261 ) ; the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointincrease is $ 7367 ; the effect on total of service and interest cost components of one-percentage-pointdecrease is $ -5974 ( 5974 ) ; ### Output: Logic: for every dollar of service and interest costs this leads to 9.81 dollars of post retirement benefits as part of the one-percentage point increase The required values from the context for the question are: postretirement benefit obligation (increase): $72238 service and interest cost (increase): $7367 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 72238 by 7367 which gives divide(72238, 7367), The final logic expression is divide(72238, 7367). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the average annual creation of new stores for aap from 2008 to 2012? Context: the new stores ( 1 ) of 2012 is 116 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2011 is 95 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2010 is 110 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2009 is 75 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2008 is 109 ; the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: . ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . ### Output: Logic: to find the average number of stores created one must add up all the stores created between the years of 2008 to 2012 . then one would divide the answer by the number of years . The required values from the context for the question are: new stores (2012): 116 new stores (2011): 95 new stores (2010): 110 new stores (2009): 75 new stores (2008): 109 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: add 116 to 109 which gives add(116, 109) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by const_2 which gives divide(add(116, 109), const_2), The final logic expression is divide(add(116, 109), const_2). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the variation observed in the operating profit , in millions? Context: in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 433 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 17 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 112 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: operating profit (2009): 433 (in millions) operating profit (2008): 17 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 17 from 433 which gives subtract(433, 17), The final logic expression is subtract(433, 17). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the average value for sales? Context: in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 3060 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 3195 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 3015 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three . The required values from the context for the question are: sales (2009): $3060 (in millions) sales (2008): $3195 (in millions) sales (2007): $3015 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: , The final logic expression is table_average(sales, none). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the lowest return for the first month of the investment? Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2014 is $ 350.82 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2014 is 175.99 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.27 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 110.41 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.46 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2014 is 178.05 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the minimum value turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: delphi automotive plc (Dec 31, 2011): $100.98 s&p 500 (Dec 31, 2011): 100.80 automotive supplier peer group (Dec 31, 2011): 89.27 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract const_100 from 89.27 which gives subtract(89.27, const_100) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(89.27, const_100), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(89.27, const_100), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: if the company were to purchase the remaining shares at the price at december 31 , 2015 , how much would the company have to pay for the remaining shares . Context: plan category the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b ) is 1442912 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights is $ 86.98 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4446967 ; principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . ### Output: Logic: this can be found by multiplying the amount of remaining shares by the share price . The required values from the context for the question are: outstanding options warrants and rights: 1442912 weighted-average price of options warrants and rights: $86.98 remaining available for future issuance: 4446967 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 86.98 by 4446967 which gives multiply(86.98, 4446967), The final logic expression is multiply(86.98, 4446967). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the variation observed between the tangible and intangible assets , in millions? Context: the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million . ### Output: Logic: it is the difference between those values . The required values from the context for the question are: intangible assets: $8.5 (in millions) tangible assets: $14.0 (in millions) assumed liabilities: $10.9 (in millions) Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 8.5 from 14.0 which gives subtract(14.0, 8.5), The final logic expression is subtract(14.0, 8.5). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the percentage of tax and accounting fees among the total acquisition-related costs? Context: acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs . ### Output: Logic: it is the value of tax and accounting fees divided by the total acquisition-related costs , then turned into a percentage . The required values from the context for the question are: Acquisition-related costs: $2.8 million Tax and accounting fees: $1.6 million Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: divide 1.6 by 2.8 which gives divide(1.6, 2.8) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1.6, 2.8), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(1.6, 2.8), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what is the difference between the highest and lowest return for the first year of the investment? Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2014 is $ 350.82 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2014 is 175.99 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.27 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 110.41 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.46 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2014 is 178.05 ; ### Output: Logic: it is the variation between the maximum and minimum value . The required values from the context for the question are: Delphi Automotive plc (November 17, 2011): $100.00 Delphi Automotive plc (December 31, 2011): $100.98 Delphi Automotive plc (December 31, 2012): $179.33 S&P 500 (November 17, 2011): 100.00 S&P 500 (December 31, 2011): 100.80 S&P 500 (December 31, 2012): 116.93 Automotive Supplier Peer Group (November 17, 2011): 100.00 Automotive Supplier Peer Group (December 31, 2011): 89.27 Automotive Supplier Peer Group (December 31, 2012): 110.41 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 110.41 from 179.33 which gives subtract(179.33, 110.41) step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(179.33, 110.41), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(subtract(179.33, 110.41), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what was the percentage increase of total deferred compensation plan investments from 2010 to 2011?\\n Context: the total deferred compensation plan investments of 2011 is $ 26410 ; the total deferred compensation plan investments of 2010 is $ 8690 ; the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: . ### Output: Logic: to find the percentage increase one must subtract the two totals and then divide the answer by the total for 2010 . The required values from the context for the question are: Total deferred compensation plan investments (2011): $26,410 Total deferred compensation plan investments (2010): $8,690 Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: subtract 8690 from 26410 which gives subtract(26410, 8690) step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 8690 which gives divide(subtract(26410, 8690), 8690) step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(26410, 8690), 8690), 100), The final logic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(26410, 8690), 8690), 100). ### End" "### Instruction: Formulate a logic expression for the question utilising the given context. Question: what would the amount accrued because of interest on the term loan facility after october 29 , 2011? Context: in addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) . ### Output: Logic: to find the amount of money that would come from interest one must multiply the amount of money they loaned by the interest rate . The required values from the context for the question are: Term loan facility amount: $145 million Interest rate as of October 29, 2011: 1.61% Lets formulate the logic step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values: step 1: multiply 145 by 1.61% which gives multiply(145, 1.61%), The final logic expression is multiply(145, 1.61%). ### End"