Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/25377156/" }

{ "text": "This intimation could not be treated as communicating to the appellant that he had a right under law, to be searched before the said authorities." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HJA8WJMI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 36, "text": "Kuljinder Singh Ahluwalia" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DOORLG7M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 125, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 95, "text": "Sandeep Kaur Ahluwalia" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZJUSBNKX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 170, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 146, "text": "Ravinder Singh Ahluwalia" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/31575547" }

{ "text": "of which the Plaintiff- Kuljinder Singh Ahluwalia, Defendant No.1 Smt. Sandeep Kaur Ahluwalia and Defendant No.2, Ravinder Singh Ahluwalia are the partners in equal share. " }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4EMK7LNY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 39, "text": "Hyderabad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3ZS9YCLR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 57, "text": "Rx.B157A and 157B" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/990641" }

{ "text": "My father therefore, could not come to Hyderabad to file Rx.B157A and 157B and therefore had given me this paper to file in this Ilon'ble Court." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/12840019" }

{ "text": "As prayed, let the writ petition be listed after a week." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1758691" }

{ "text": "In the present case, there is no material indicating that the work is not available." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z7H0193B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "23.10.2004" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3A37E7P3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 41, "text": "Mahavir Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/158255212/" }

{ "text": "On 23.10.2004, whey they again contacted Mahavir Singh then he replied that he had no knowledge as to where the truck is at that time." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QTJVRWKD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "18.10.1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FH8VX2HV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 59, "text": "Kadher" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "11S0J8AL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 126, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 116, "text": "Ravisankar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "K50PXXVY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 152, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 143, "text": "Mariappan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1334477" }

{ "text": "On 18.10.1999 he recorded the voluntary statement of P.W.6 Kadher on the basis of which he arrested the 5th accused Ravisankar and the accused Mariappan, since deceased and sent them to judicial custody." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3QR5SY3Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 56, "text": "Arun" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2XDG7S8E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 119, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 112, "text": "Sadhana" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1551741" }

{ "text": "The fact in issue or relevant fact is whether appellant Arun took any part and if so what part in the murder of Sadhana." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8FM0FL1E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 4, "text": "EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H09DBNYA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 77, "text": "REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O69C533F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 161, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 149, "text": "V.M. BANAKAR" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TI2O7BAT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 229, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 209, "text": "ARTICLES 226 AND 227" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TR2TO0PO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 258, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 237, "text": "CONSTITUTION OF INDIA" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/67357053" }

{ "text": "THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.M. BANAKAR, ADDL. SPP FOR R1-R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UR5QG2EI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 172, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 155, "text": "article 286(1)(b)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/204111/" }

{ "text": "Before considering how far the cashew-nut purchases made by the respondents are, on the findings returned by the High Court, entitled to the protection of article 286(1)(b), it is necessary first to ascertain the scope of such protection." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/568313" }

{ "text": "The court held that the claimant who opts for accepting the lump-sum compensation based on structured formula would get the relief at the earliest." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/455901/" }

{ "text": "The petitioner and several others then approached the General Foreman who intervened and ordered the petitioner and others to join duty." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HWGDRBPJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 32, "text": "Calcutta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BU35ZCXE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 117, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 58, "text": "Rogers Pratt Shellac Co, v. Secy. of State, AIR 1925 Cal 34" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1496679" }

{ "text": "The learned Judges relying on a Calcutta case reported in Rogers Pratt Shellac Co, v. Secy. of State, AIR 1925 Cal 34, observed:-- \"It is clear therefore, that income may accrue, to an assessee without the actual receipt of the same." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZQ270FPH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 116, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 112, "text": "Dhar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "956IH7GC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 141, "text": "Sikandar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "A38OPWS1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 163, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 159, "text": "Aziz" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q7ZOBL3U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 312, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 301, "text": "P.K.Jaiswal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IPRRLXN4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 350, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 334, "text": "Jarat Kumar Jain" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F7M3QLR1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 448, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 432, "text": "W.P.No.1361/2013" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NIK4RP18", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 459, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 449, "text": "14/12/2015" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/166504428" }

{ "text": "Let fresh bailable warrant of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) be issued through Superintendent of Police,\n\nDhar to the respondents No.1 Sikandar and No.2 Aziz for a date to be fixed by the Registry to secure the presence of the respondents No.1 and 2, made returnable within six weeks.\n\n\n\n (P.K.Jaiswal) (Jarat Kumar Jain)\n Judge Judge ns.\n W.P.No.1361/2013 14/12/2015 Parties through their Counsel." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LRZCHPPF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 9, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Section 8" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BINXDUBC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 17, "text": "NDPS Act of 1985" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PTK55WX5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 45, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 38, "text": "Rule 53" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NZWNWNAO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 71, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 53, "text": "NDPS Rules of 1985" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/60274377" }

{ "text": "Section 8 of the NDPS Act of 1985 and Rule 53 of the NDPS Rules of 1985 contain a prohibitory clause." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "04K6P51P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 120, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 110, "text": "Parshottam" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/855238" }

{ "text": "The deceased was then dealt dharia blows by the defendants in the neighbouring field of the second respondent Parshottam and murder of the deceased was committed by belabouring him cruelly and intentionally out of enmity and malice." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z2DKDF6X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 86, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 37, "text": "Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana (2000) 5 SCC 82" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/150799699/" }

{ "text": "\n\n30.The Ld. Trial Court referred to Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana (2000) 5 SCC 82 to deny the benevolent provisions of release on probation to the appellant and to award substantive sentences for the <span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_14\">Crl." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EL856M6P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 12, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 5, "text": "Darvish" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T0JCCAWK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 45, "text": "s 25" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BSNHRVSY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 57, "text": "Arms Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WTQOUQFS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 115, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 104, "text": "Yash Sharma" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L8XOHOXW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 127, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 120, "text": "Lekhraj" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/195710353/" }

{ "text": "4/21 Darvish was convicted for the offence u/s 25 of the Arms Act while other co-accused persons namely Yash Sharma and Lekhraj were acquitted." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1812627" }

{ "text": "There was an offer to send details of the routes where augmentation of trips was considered necessary and to supply the names of suitable operators for that purpose on receipt of a reply from the State Transport Authority." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LDN55I61", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 11, "text": "Special Case No. 24 of 1982" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N3KPXTXO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 43, "text": "Special Case No. 3/83" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ENSCA1LD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 118, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 80, "text": "Court of Special judge, Greater Bombay" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "GLE5MK1C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 133, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 124, "text": "R.B. Sule" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XC4EGW1D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 191, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 171, "text": "High Court of Bombay" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1353689/" }

{ "text": "Therefore, Special Case No. 24 of 1982 and Special Case No. 3/83 pending in the Court of Special judge, Greater Bombay Shri R.B. Sule are withdrawn and transferred to the High Court of Bombay with a request to the learned Chief Justice to assign these two cases to a sitting Judge of the High Court." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/69940573" }

{ "text": "In the instant case, since the property was pledged to the respondent bank and for non-payment of the loan amount the property was attached for the purposes of sale, provisions of the Act, 2002 will be applicable in the instant case which bars such suits and grant of injunction." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WDNKOXAI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 127, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 74, "text": "Haricharan Kurmi v. State of Bihar [1964 (6) SCR 623]" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1769219/" }

{ "text": "After referring to these decisions, a Constitution Bench of this Court in Haricharan Kurmi v. State of Bihar [1964 (6) SCR 623] further clarified the legal position thus:\n\"\u0005\u0005.In dealing with a case against an accused person" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PSNQ7TH4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 136, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 130, "text": "Hunsur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T5ROFJXC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 145, "text": "Mysore" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/9002064" }

{ "text": "It is also in the evidence of PW.24 that accused was taken by the police with other witnesses to a distance of 15 to 16 kms. from Hunsur towards Mysore, where mahazar Ex.P.48 was prepared and signed by him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y0SYKXH6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 269, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 251, "text": "Central Government" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/547310" }

{ "text": "operated with the Commissioner of Income-tax most willingly and produced the documents of title and furnished all other particulars and handed over possession of the property and also attorned the tenancy of a portion of the building in favour of the Central Government." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PO1EJGAZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 63, "text": "Monika" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LXBCUH48", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 290, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 284, "text": "Monika" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1329571" }

{ "text": "The report of radiological examination of the prosecutrix PW 2 Monika is also Ex. P/5, which shows x-rays of elbow, wrist joint and pelvis were taken for determining the radiological age of the prosecutrix and it has opined in that report Ex. P/5 that the age of the prosecutrix PW 2 Monika was about between 15 to 17 years," }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1761540/" }

{ "text": "The unsecured loan shall not carry any interest during the implementation period and such unsecured loans may carry interest at the rate not exceeding the average rate of interest on the Institutional Rupee Loans for the Project or the rate of dividend paid on Equity capital, whichever is lower." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "47GTBPMD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 16, "text": "Champalal Jain" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1557000" }

{ "text": "The evidence of Champalal Jain (P. W. 1) is, more or less, to the same effect." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WF5OGWYI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 39, "text": "Section 68(2)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1182530" }

{ "text": "In regard to the enumerated matters in Section 68(2), there is a statutory recognition that the State Government has power to make rules with regard to them." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/270103/" }

{ "text": "Thus unless and until the Assessing Officer bid obtained the details and information regarding the exact bifurcation of provisions under various heads described above, it could not have been said as to what amount pertained to which particular head and whether the head 'sundries' also included any doubtful debts." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "QSS1ES9U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 11, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/107398032" }

{ "text": "Before the Supreme Court, the State contended that the Board of Revenue was not conferred with such authority and that the circular in fact granted an exemption." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z1PZ0WMI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 40, "text": "RSA 116/2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1VRS7NAS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 117, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 101, "text": "9 th April, 2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QT61QZKD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 243, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 227, "text": "4 th March, 2011" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/191898516" }

{ "text": "That is how the same is before us. \n\n2. RSA 116/2011 has been preferred impugning the judgment dated 9 th April, 2010 of the Civil Judge rejecting the plaint in the suit preferred by the appellant as well as the judgment dated 4 th March, 2011 of the Learned Additional District Judge dismissing the first appeal preferred by the appellant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "IXBDPUTS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 14, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 9, "text": "Avadh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OVZUNMR7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 54, "text": "Dost Mohammad v. Emperor, AIR 1944 Oudh 310" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1932522" }

{ "text": "The only Avadh case to which we have been referred is Dost Mohammad v. Emperor, AIR 1944 Oudh 310." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "F972LP7D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 28, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 18, "text": "M. L. Daga" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/963087" }

{ "text": "Petitioner No. 5, M. L. Daga, of the three Rules is the agent of the owners in respect of the above collieries." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1U61JQJN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 30, "text": "Manoj Sood" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OYKW2VQE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 138, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 128, "text": "11-10-1989" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1367278" }

{ "text": "It was also rightly held that Manoj Sood (No. 2) was not meant to protect their right which, indeed, was born under order dated 11-10-1989, passed subsequent to that decision." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1959928/" }

{ "text": "The bulk of the beneficiaries are rural indigents and the rest urban workers." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1938952" }

{ "text": "Again, there is no indication in this chapter that the Mutawallis of wakfs-alal-aulad have some different powers in relation to the usufructs of the wakf property or in relation to the management thereof." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LQN1DPK5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 9, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 0, "text": "N. K. Sen" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "MNQWJU7M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 329, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 296, "text": "Bhuan Chandra Bhar Estate Limited" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/231528" }

{ "text": "N. K. Sen, J., who dealt with it held that the Magistrate had been under a complete misapprehension about the nature of the possession of the petitioners before him, because the only possession which they had claimed in the proceedings and were still claiming was possession as tenants under the Bhuan Chandra Bhar Estate Limited." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HLZLNAP6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 4, "text": "Gurmanjit Rai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DBG7G25K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 29, "text": "Forensic Medicines, Medical College, Amritsar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AGQEISWT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 140, "text": "Sucha Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/45198249" }

{ "text": "Dr. Gurmanjit Rai, Lecturer, Forensic Medicines, Medical College, Amritsar (PW-1) conducted the post mortem examination on the dead body of Sucha Singh." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2OE889N2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 116, "text": "Crime No.15 of 1996" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D66ID579", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 152, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 142, "text": "24.06.1996" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OQLKLPFB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 169, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 160, "text": "C.B.C.I.D" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/174157617" }

{ "text": "It is pertinent to note that the alleged transactions took place between 1990 and 1993 as per the FIR registered in Crime No.15 of 1996 dated 24.06.1996 by the C.B.C.I.D.." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LPNGK0Z3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 20, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "September 9, 1981" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/497388/" }

{ "text": "On September 9, 1981 a detailed memorandum was prepared for cabinet discussion." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "H8KDPZHD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 4, "text": "MOP No.722 of 2007" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "45R485V8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 52, "text": "Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Visakhapatnam" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/41156998" }

{ "text": "\n5. MOP No.722 of 2007 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Visakhapatnam is the claim by the minor children for the death of their mother." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1484009" }

{ "text": "In that case the assessee entered into an agreement with an oil company by which she sold to the company 20 acres of her land." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HHU4XNQU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 23, "text": "Hindu Rao Hospital" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/102520965" }

{ "text": "He took his brother to Hindu Rao Hospital in a police jeep where he remained admitted for about 10 days." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DP9KT4FE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 81, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 72, "text": "Rajasthan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7JX4PVEP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 157, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 140, "text": "Indian Parliament" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZO5RO4W9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 310, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 305, "text": "India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PE67B1KN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 336, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 327, "text": "Rajasthan" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1766511" }

{ "text": "But at the same time, it may be pointed out that so far as the State of Rajasthan is concerned, it is conceded by both the parties that the Indian Parliament has not up till now enacted any law on the subject of extradition of the fugitive offenders who, after having committed offences in other parts of India, take asylum in Rajasthan." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "F36S9WCR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 65, "text": "Jodhpur" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1903972" }

{ "text": "In the present case, the jagir was a grant from the Rulers of ex-Jodhpur State and, therefore, the doctrine of incorporation does not seem to be applicable." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "R4GDUFWS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 37, "text": "Article 14" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ANNSVG5X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 67, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 55, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/856083" }

{ "text": " \n Does it violate the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution?" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "FBIALWR6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 45, "text": "Aman Bhardwaj @ Bobby" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "68YZQ6PD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 68, "text": "Kapil Sharma @ Monu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8883JFSR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 104, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 92, "text": "Mohd. Tayyab" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BOKDCKPX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 143, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 137, "text": "s. 201" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0UVKW6T5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 150, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 147, "text": "IPC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZRG0S0GU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 161, "text": "Section 120B" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UPCPBEE8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 180, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 177, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/13336223/" }

{ "text": "Hence, all the three accused persons,namely, Aman Bhardwaj @ Bobby, Kapil Sharma @ Monu and Mohd. Tayyab are acquitted for the offence U/s. 201 of IPC read with Section 120B of IPC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UB4WCQQ4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 66, "text": "Consolidation of Holdings Punjab" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QXUSJ1XI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 112, "text": "Section 42" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CZG7M8L0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 207, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 130, "text": "East Punjab Holding (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act. 1948" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/832311" }

{ "text": "The writ petitioners have challenged the order of the Director of Consolidation of Holdings Punjab passed under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holding (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act. 1948 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Act) in this petition." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "VUZDS03K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 94, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 10, "text": "Oil & Flour Mills v. State of Mysore [C.R.P. No. 1157 of 1961 (Karnataka High Court)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/199468" }

{ "text": " \n (viii) Oil & Flour Mills v. State of Mysore [C.R.P. No. 1157 of 1961 (Karnataka High Court)]. - In this case this Court held that seegekai powder (soapnut powder) prepared out of seegekai (soapnut) was not a different commodity and, therefore, cannot be taxed as a separate item." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GDWTD8DG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 88, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 80, "text": "2-9-1970" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FIUBZEL2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 132, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 110, "text": "M. J. C. No. 3 of 1970" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1686330" }

{ "text": "(5) The Civil Revision, which was heard by this Court, was from the order dated 2-9-1970, which was passed in M. J. C. No. 3 of 1970." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PIQZPEO9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 246, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 213, "text": "Chhindwara (M.P.) District Prison" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/163662439" }

{ "text": "From the further evidence of Investigating officer it has come on record that in view of fingerprint expert report and on police authorities coming to know that the appellant was involved in this crime and was in Chhindwara (M.P.) District Prison, necessary steps were taken by the Investigating Agency to secure his presence and on effecting his arrest, supplementary charge-sheet came to be filed against him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "TBPCATTT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 367, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 359, "text": "3-6-1952" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/718964/" }

{ "text": "The evidence against the appellant is wholly circumstantial, and consists mainly of (1) the existence of a strong motive, (2) the conduct of the appellant on the day when the murder was committed, (3) the recovery of a blood- stained axe and a false beard at the instance of the appellant, and (4) a confession made by him 'before the Magistrate, P.W. 21, on 3-6-1952." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DQLUENWO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 0, "text": "Ravula Venkat" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L71QOWA6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 32, "text": "3-07-07" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D7CP6VAL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 40, "text": "01-07-25" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SZCXLGPY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 49, "text": "5-6-4" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "YED7YCPL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 55, "text": "Reddy" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1970447" }

{ "text": "Ravula Venkat -do- -do- 0-03-02 3-07-07 01-07-25 5-6-4 Reddy SC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DAPLCFOE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 32, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 21, "text": "K.T. Thomas" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AV5EAM1P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 52, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 36, "text": "Hamsa v. Ibrahim" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/498377" }

{ "text": "His Lordship Justice K.T. Thomas in Hamsa v. Ibrahim, in fact answered all the doubts raised in this reference." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "M5PDIUM2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 30, "text": "Abbas Ali" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/10932" }

{ "text": "The fourth respondent one Mr. Abbas Ali, claimed to be the Inspector of Excise has also filed a separate counter." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/238906/" }

{ "text": "In view of this, the learned counsel for the assessee urged the Bench to allow the depreciation as these transactions are genuine lease transactions." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1983056" }

{ "text": "It is reiterated that apart from the above amount, the claimants are entitled to interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum on their respective shares from the date of filing of the original petition." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "KBIGH8EJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 38, "text": "Rule 9 (2)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/79223796" }

{ "text": "This Court held in the said case that Rule 9 (2) of the Rules fixing strength of ethyl alcohol in toddy is not arbitrary or unreasonable." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AKD7LLWB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 4, "text": "S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5573/2012 Mahendra Kumar Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170250118" }

{ "text": "AND S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5573/2012 Mahendra Kumar Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/98845407" }

{ "text": "I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent - State." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/158786752/" }

{ "text": "In his opinion there was no evidence of recent sexual intercourse." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/191703" }

{ "text": "But the underlying principle is the same." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8PK3QNPS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 4, "text": "Central Counsel of Indian Medicine" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1OULF8AQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 213, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 188, "text": "Ayurveda Medical Colleges" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EBGU58FH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 222, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 217, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1025482" }

{ "text": "The Central Counsel of Indian Medicine has revised the norms for the functioning of Ayurveda Colleges and prescribed 13 Department systems as basic minimum standard for the functioning of Ayurveda Medical Colleges in India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MHHS1P2M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 53, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 31, "text": "Police Station Suatala" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CS01Y9BO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 92, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 72, "text": "Sections 394 and 342" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "32OADNVU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 96, "text": "I.P.C." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "E25GALSW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 139, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 126, "text": "Ambika Prasad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3REU2Y7L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 163, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 149, "text": "Abhishek Dubey" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/105769111" }

{ "text": "On receiving such complaint at Police Station Suatala, an offence under Sections 394 and 342 of I.P.C. was registered against Ambika Prasad, his son Abhishek Dubey and other unidentified persons at about 3.45 PM." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "R6ZV9ZF8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 17, "text": "Ramesh Prasad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OFQS2TU9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 85, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 73, "text": "Kushal Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CHW21GJ3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 89, "text": "21/5/1984" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SZMFE1SM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 103, "text": "11/10/1985" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/105451006" }

{ "text": "Plaintiff No. 2- Ramesh Prasad had taken some loan from defendant No. 2- Kushal Singh on 21/5/1984 and 11/10/1985 of Rs. 4,000/- and 4100/- and on said dates executed sale deeds respectively in the name of defendant No. 1." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/682447" }

{ "text": "Under such contract, the goods which are imported by the Government under a licence issued in favour of the Controller, will be taken delivery of by the petitioner as agent of the Government and then delivered to the respective consignees." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/15686033" }

{ "text": "The contention of the petitioner that respondents 2 and 3 ought to have disproved his case to succeed in their cases also cannot be accepted in law." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "X0JOF40Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 93, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 82, "text": "Manohar Lal" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1306966" }

{ "text": "Investigating Officer of that case has not been examined in defence to state that Manohar Lal (PW-14) had been cited as witness in the said case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BLQSZSG2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 124, "text": "Section 323" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6MR2L1LT", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 139, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 136, "text": "IPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/185067942/" }

{ "text": "Law provides for a sentence of either description upto one year or with fine upto Rs. 1,000/- or both for the offence under Section 323 IPC." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "EGMKH12I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 34, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZT8BTFKD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 119, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 51, "text": "Ambica Prasad Mishra Vs. State of U.P., reported at AIR 1980 SC 1762" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1649633" }

{ "text": "It then quoted from a judgment of Supreme Court in Ambica Prasad Mishra Vs. State of U.P., reported at AIR 1980 SC 1762, in para 23 as under :\n \"23. ..." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "69AYQG2K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 37, "text": "Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/446119" }

{ "text": "In that case again the provisions of Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act were Questioned on the ground that the said Act could not be in force after the coming into force of the Central Act with which we are concerned in this case." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1318014" }

{ "text": "The said Maxim means that general words do not derogate from the special." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "RVIHFJSP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 21, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 7, "text": "Act VI of 1958" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LDD44VNS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 102, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 91, "text": "Article 254" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1977666" }

{ "text": "As the Act VI of 1958 was repugnant to a Central law on the same subiect it was void under Article 254 because it did not receive the President's assent." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "COLH36KS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 164, "text": "29-1-1982" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/666052" }

{ "text": "The Respondents above named state as follows:\n \n\nOn the direction of the Hon'ble Court, the Respondents have given proposals to give effect to the Agreement dated 29-1-1982, except to the extent it stands modified/varied, as specifically mentioned therein, because of the subsequent events." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y2TNCWQQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 63, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 46, "text": "Sardar Joga Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/698632" }

{ "text": "To corroborate his statement, he examined PW4 Sardar Joga Singh, his relative who was following his car in a jeep." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "W70GUWC2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 89, "text": "National Consumer Disputes Redresal Commission" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/20426472" }

{ "text": "It is also not in dispute that complainant has urged in the grounds of appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redresal Commission, that Post Mortem is a must to know exact cause of death." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Z2RFHD4U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 88, "text": "29.4.1995" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HW1PKHJD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 107, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 99, "text": "6.5.1995" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9EH4JO1A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 117, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 109, "text": "8.5.1995" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7NET5HOA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 130, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 122, "text": "8.3.1996" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1403129" }

{ "text": "All appeals of the State arising from the judgments of the learned District Judge dated 29.4.1995, 6.5.1995, 8.5.1995 and 8.3.1996 awarding Rs. 9,15,000/- per acre to the claimants are hereby partly accepted .and the claimants instead of Rs. 9,15,000/- would be entitled to get the above amount of Rs. 6,53,400/- per acre with all statutory benefits." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZJ5XQJ62", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Hema Kulkarni" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "U4V8H3BV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 67, "text": "Criminal Appeal No. 372/2008" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/64574107" }

{ "text": "Smt.Hema Kulkarni, the learned counsel appears for accused No.6 in Criminal Appeal No. 372/2008." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/84778288" }

{ "text": "In the result, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions for trial." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DFXE3P1X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 294, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 285, "text": "s. 80E(1)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/81055/" }

{ "text": "In other words the High Court upheld the view of the Tribunal on the first question while on the second question it took the view that the unabsorbed depreciation and development rebate were deductible before arriving at the figure that would be exigible to the deduction of 8% under, s. 80E(1) and therefore." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/137271740/" }

{ "text": "We, accordingly, find and hold that the compensation for the loss of Appellant's future earnings must be computed on that basis." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "X2XPW31Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 30, "text": "Tilakchand" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1924452/" }

{ "text": "P.W. 35 the wood stall keeper Tilakchand, who saw him on his way to pick up his victim, is definite that the appellant was not wear- ing a coat at the time." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6F2E993X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 108, "text": "Veeranna Satnoor" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86053400" }

{ "text": "However, the learned member of the Tribunal did not accept the evidence tendered by the medical officer, Dr.Veeranna Satnoor (PW8) regarding his evaluation of physical disability at 40%, and has awarded Rs.10,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.25,000/- towards medical expenses, Rs.10,000/- towards loss of future amenities in life, Rs.3,200/- towards conveyance and special diet and Rs.28,800/- towards loss of earning due to disability, in all, Rs.76,000/-." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "C4380YR4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 152, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 111, "text": "Court of Judicial Magistrate, Hanumangarh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1606869" }

{ "text": "After when the investigation was over, the police submitted a crime report against the three appellants in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Hanumangarh, who, in his turn, committed the case for trial." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GGP4OXCP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 48, "text": "Chimpirayya" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AYF9ZMOQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 159, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 148, "text": "Chimpirayya" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "land&property_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/388201/" }

{ "text": "she had knowledge of it only after the death of Chimpirayya, her knowledge dated back to the date when the Will was executed, 'and, therefore, when Chimpirayya died he must be deemed to have died separated from the family with the result that the Will would operate on his separate interest." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZO9WG4BS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 152, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 142, "text": "11.10.2002" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "14LI2IR3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 153, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 152, "text": "," } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AMXFF5AN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 164, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 154, "text": "15.11.2002" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JUPSX9A3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 181, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 172, "text": "9.12.2002" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/544944" }

{ "text": "The Court below has come to the conclusion that the reason given for not filing written statement, though sufficient opportunity was given on 11.10.2002, 15.11.2002 and on 9.12.2002, is nothing but false." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "05NXFIJL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 117, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 112, "text": "Sukha" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XWJXIBL4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 175, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 170, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/110794538/" }

{ "text": "From the above evidence and particularly lack of expert evidence it is difficult to conclude that accused No. 1 Sukha had committed forgery to secure a passport to leave India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J9WVAASC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 15, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 5, "text": "Article 14" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q2P2J35A", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 129, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 102, "text": "Bhagat Ram v. State of H.P." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1552649" }

{ "text": "That Article 14 gets attracted in a case of disproportionate punishment was the view of this Court in Bhagat Ram v. State of H.P., also." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1190404" }

{ "text": "That order of the State Government is at An-nexure-A to the petition." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OBLM8CE7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 157, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 139, "text": "British Parliament" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1515069/" }

{ "text": "And rights and interests of citizen of the independent sovereign state continue to be governed by legislations enacted for colonies by the British Parliament." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "0QET4KL8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 236, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 224, "text": "Vijay Kharat" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/115345743" }

{ "text": "Copy of the chargesheet is not filed and it can be said that police FA No. 14/13 & Anr. \n\n did not file chargesheet for such offence against the respondent No. 1, driver. \n\n 12) Copy of driving licence of respondent No. 1 - Vijay Kharat is on the record at Exh. 36." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3SUA24RN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 5, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 0, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1657323/" }

{ "text": "India is one of the signatories to the Convention and it played a commendable role suggesting suitable amendments in the preparatory conferences." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/715952" }

{ "text": "According to the writ petitioners the amendment that has been brought forth has ushered drastic changes in the Principal Act frustrating the whole object and purpose of the Act and hence, the same is totally unconstitutional." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/900715" }

{ "text": "\"Now here the first six items, amounting to Rs. 20,74,973, may Perhaps reasonably never be regarded as the equivalent of cash, but the seventh item of Rs. 17,34,596, consisting of the debtor's own promissory notes, was clearly not an equivalent of cash." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XJ2RGKML", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 40, "text": "Bar Council of Kerala" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2WMYWPTP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 89, "text": "12.2.1997" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1802196/" }

{ "text": "This resolution was communicated to the Bar Council of Kerala by registered A.D. post on 12.2.1997." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/911769/" }

{ "text": "is a lis an\taffirmation by\t one party and denial by another," }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1677837/" }

{ "text": "The words used are \" in respect of any year\" and not \" in respect of the year \"." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3FAVAQBU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 54, "text": "Kishor" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "B22GY45F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 78, "text": "Crime No.26 of 2005" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CCWM70L3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 220, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 207, "text": "Motiram Hiray" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/7333765" }

{ "text": "On the basis of the said information of accused no.1- Kishor, an offence vide Crime No.26 of 2005 was registered as motor accident offence and the investigation was entrusted to PW-10- Police Head Constable Motiram Hiray." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7S4L0UUL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 16, "text": "Ramesh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TFE66QD5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 46, "text": "Rajender" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QMAOXY44", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 108, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 98, "text": "15.10.2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "93G2LJTR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 177, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 172, "text": "Newal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "331X8HTY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 188, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 182, "text": "Ramesh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/121483805" }

{ "text": "He deposed that Ramesh deceased and appellant Rajender were residing together in a quarter and on 15.10.2006, he started watching television in a room in Commando Complex, Newal and Ramesh was lying on the cot and Azad Constable came there, who was also on duty." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "84EWCDK4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 73, "text": "India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HNDOOHBC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 126, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 113, "text": "Section 80HHC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9I3TQZAM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 146, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 134, "text": "IT Act, 1961" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/398930/" }

{ "text": "Therefore, the assessee should earn a profit from exporting goods out of India in Order to claim deduction under Section 80HHC of the IT Act, 1961." }