document: Discreteness and relevance : a reply to Roman Poznanski In reply to Poznanski -LRB- see ibid. , p. 435 , 2002 -RRB- on discreteness and relevance , Eliasmith claims that all of the concerns voiced by Poznanski in his reply fail to offer a serious challenge to the idea that continuity is irrelevant to a good understanding of cognitive systems . Eliasmith hopes that it is evident that he does not claim that the process in neural systems is discrete , but rather that a complete characterization of the process can be discrete ; these of course are significantly different claims
doc_bio_tags: B O B O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B O B O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B O O O O O O O B I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
extractive_keyphrases: discreteness relevance continuity cognitive systems neural systems