text: Remote evaluations of violence against women and girls interventions a rapid scoping review of tools ethics and safety Although programmes and policies targeting violence against women and girls VAWG have increased in the past decade there is a paucity of evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions To expand this evidence base researchers increasingly employ remote data collection RDC including online surveys mobile applications and telephone interviews in their evaluations Although RDC allows for evaluations without in person interactions which are restricted during crises such as the COVID 19 pandemic information about these methods is necessary to understand their potential usefulness and limitations This scoping review examines remote evaluations of VAWG interventions to describe the landscape of RDC methods reflect on safety and ethical considerations and offer best practices for RDC in VAWG research Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria with seven five and two studies employing telephone interviews online surveys and mobile applications respectively Studies commonly stated that participants were asked to use a safe email or device but the method for verifying such safety was rarely specified Best practices around safety included creating a quick escape button for online data collection to use when another individual was present explaining to participants how to erase browsing history and application purchases and asking participants to specify a safe time for researchers to call Only eight studies established referral pathways for respondents as per best practice None of the eligible studies took place in low middle income countries LMICs or humanitarian settings likely reflecting the additional challenges to using RDC methods in lower resource settings Findings were used to create a best practice checklist for programme evaluators and Institutional Review Boards using RDC for VAWG interventions The authors found that opportunities exist for researchers to safely and effectively use RDC methodologies to gather VAWG data but that further study is needed to gauge the feasibility of these methods in LMICs and humanitarian settings 