rita443 commited on
Commit
32e6df8
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 8223062

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +11 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -103,12 +103,21 @@ tags:
103
  ---
104
  # Buscapé Sample annotated for Semantic Role Labelling
105
 
 
 
106
  The Propbank-Br is a project that aims to annotate corpora with semantic role labels for the purpose of creating training datasets for automated semantic role classifiers. The annotation scheme is quite similar to that of the English Propbank (Palmer et al., 2005), with language-specific differences taken into account. The set of semantic roles was designed to facilitate automatic learning. The annotation is done on syntactic trees generated by the Palavras parser (Bick, 2000).
107
 
108
  This particular sample was annotated for the purpose of evaluating semantic role classifiers. It contains 840 instances annotated with semantic role labels on syntactic trees generated by the Palavras parser (Bick, 2000). The instances were extracted from the Buscapé corpus (Hartmann et al. 2014), a corpus of user reviews on products. The syntactic trees in the sample were not reviewed by humans, and were annotated using two annotators for each sentence (double-blind annotation).
109
 
 
110
 
111
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
112
 
113
  - **Annotated by:** [PROSA](https://sites.google.com/view/prosa-nilc)
114
  - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
@@ -118,7 +127,7 @@ This particular sample was annotated for the purpose of evaluating semantic role
118
 
119
  ### Dataset Sources
120
 
121
- - **Paper [optional]:** Hartmann, N. S.; Avanço. L.; Balage, P. P.; Duran, M. S.; Nunes, M. G. V.; Pardo, T.; Aluísio, S. (2014). A Large Opinion Corpus in Portuguese - Tackling Out-Of-Vocabulary Words. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014).
122
 
123
  ## Uses
124
 
 
103
  ---
104
  # Buscapé Sample annotated for Semantic Role Labelling
105
 
106
+ ## Propbank-Br Corpora Buscapé Sample
107
+
108
  The Propbank-Br is a project that aims to annotate corpora with semantic role labels for the purpose of creating training datasets for automated semantic role classifiers. The annotation scheme is quite similar to that of the English Propbank (Palmer et al., 2005), with language-specific differences taken into account. The set of semantic roles was designed to facilitate automatic learning. The annotation is done on syntactic trees generated by the Palavras parser (Bick, 2000).
109
 
110
  This particular sample was annotated for the purpose of evaluating semantic role classifiers. It contains 840 instances annotated with semantic role labels on syntactic trees generated by the Palavras parser (Bick, 2000). The instances were extracted from the Buscapé corpus (Hartmann et al. 2014), a corpus of user reviews on products. The syntactic trees in the sample were not reviewed by humans, and were annotated using two annotators for each sentence (double-blind annotation).
111
 
112
+ ## Data Treatment at LIAAD
113
 
114
+ 131 propositions were excluded in this revision of the dataset. These included propositions with verb index annotation errors or no verb annotations, and propositions with more
115
+ than one label for a word. Additionally, we removed arguments
116
+ labeled as "AM-MED" or "AM-PIN" because there is no mention of these labels in
117
+ the annotation guides, and we removed
118
+ any propositions with flags "WRONGSUBCORPUS", "LATER" or "REEXAMINE",
119
+ since, according to the guide, these indicate something wrong with the sentence that
120
+ prevents its annotation.
121
 
122
  - **Annotated by:** [PROSA](https://sites.google.com/view/prosa-nilc)
123
  - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
 
127
 
128
  ### Dataset Sources
129
 
130
+ - **Paper:** Hartmann, N. S.; Avanço. L.; Balage, P. P.; Duran, M. S.; Nunes, M. G. V.; Pardo, T.; Aluísio, S. (2014). A Large Opinion Corpus in Portuguese - Tackling Out-Of-Vocabulary Words. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014).
131
 
132
  ## Uses
133