dialogue_opp_transformed_v9.csv

user_query,assistant_response
I'm considering a case between Euro48 in the Unknown domain and Salha85 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,33 (Unknown) and Ama03 (Unknown).","From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean57 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni30 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. "
I'm considering a case between Bazar47 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa22 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The opposing party argues the similarity in phonetic and visual aspects between 'CLEAN & FRESH' and 'CLEAN & FRESCH'. They claim that the opposed brand has similar sounding, which could lead to confusion among their customers.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. L'opposition est justifiée par un risque potentiel de confusion entre les marques et des préjudices potentiels pour le titulaire de la marque existante.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation22 (Unknown) and Nostradis11 (Unknown).,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Morus56 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis38 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Anaqa55 from the Unknown domain and Bazar60 from the Unknown domain?,From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kokomilano27 from the Unknown domain and L'opposant43 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. Legally, you can consider: L'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect78 (Unknown) and Morus83 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro92 (Unknown) and Salha96 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste06 (Unknown) and Morus21 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Les produits couverts par les deux signes sont identiques. Les deux signes en question comportent des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, en particulier l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral44 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation10 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving L'opposant00 from the Unknown domain and Ama29 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Nostradis31 (Unknown) and Salha82 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty36 (Unknown) and Kayna35 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
I'm considering a case between Ste66 in the Unknown domain and Liberty42 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral43 from the Unknown domain and Bellakhdar48 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Newprotect69 from the Unknown domain and Ral33 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar81 (Unknown) and Ral00 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. Legally, you can consider: Les articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, ainsi que l'article 148.2 de la loi 17.97."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty67 (Unknown) and Univers46 (Unknown).,
I'm considering a case between Liberty99 in the Unknown domain and Laayouni68 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro09 (Unknown) and Moto86 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving L'opposant03 (Unknown) and Laayouni69 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ste92 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni87 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Laayouni53 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano46 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama25 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation84 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
"Can you provide arguments for a case involving Univers42 from the Unknown domain and Labindus,32 from the Unknown domain?","Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. "
I'm considering a case between Laayouni45 in the Unknown domain and Salha52 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect96 (Unknown) and Labindus,37 (Unknown).","Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro43 (Unknown) and Boussafa83 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. 
I'm considering a case between Anaqa68 in the Unknown domain and Clean91 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ama76 (Unknown) and Bella29 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. "
I'm considering a case between Bazar81 in the Unknown domain and Ama81 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro42 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis83 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. "
I'm considering a case between Bazar92 in the Unknown domain and Salha87 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. L'opposition est justifiée par un risque potentiel de confusion entre les marques et des préjudices potentiels pour le titulaire de la marque existante.."
I'm considering a case between Bellakhdar12 in the Unknown domain and Kokomilano26 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: l’article 148.2 sur le droit d’opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ferbalmo00 from the Unknown domain and Ama37 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar31 from the Unknown domain and Bazar52 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste20 (Unknown) and L'opposant12 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro79 (Unknown) and Clean09 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving L'opposant91 from the Unknown domain and Ste02 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
I'm considering a case between Univers91 in the Unknown domain and Clean65 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral80 from the Unknown domain and Anaqa24 from the Unknown domain?,From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. 
I'm considering a case between Univers68 in the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo10 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,
I'm considering a case between Univers21 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa89 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kayna46 from the Unknown domain and Bazar55 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect89 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo87 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: L'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation51 (Unknown) and Boussafa94 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The opposing party argues the similarity in phonetic and visual aspects between 'CLEAN & FRESH' and 'CLEAN & FRESCH'. They claim that the opposed brand has similar sounding, which could lead to confusion among their customers.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ama89 (Unknown) and Sulfonation42 (Unknown).,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bazar81 (Unknown) and Sulfonation88 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama34 from the Unknown domain and Ste57 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Loi 17/97 modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, article 148.2."
"I'm considering a case between Labindus,98 in the Unknown domain and L'opposant90 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?","From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I'm considering a case between Bazar83 in the Unknown domain and Liberty89 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: Loi marocaine 17-97 relative à la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05."
I'm considering a case between Morus65 in the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo21 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Liberty38 from the Unknown domain and Bazar26 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: La société RAL TRADE invoque les dispositions de l'article 148.2 de la loi 17-97 modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. Les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de ladite loi sont cités en relation avec la contrefaçon de la marque.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving L'opposant06 (Unknown) and Salha25 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Liberty42 from the Unknown domain and Salha26 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Legally, you can consider: Loi 17-97, telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05, donnant droit à tout titulaire de droit antérieur, d'intenter une action en opposition contre une demande d'enregistrement d'une marque qui lui est préjudiciable. Plus particulièrement les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de la loi 17-97 sont cités.."
I'm considering a case between Laayouni55 in the Unknown domain and Kayna45 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. "
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,41 (Unknown) and Clean01 (Unknown).","Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Sulfonation46 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis74 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Laayouni48 from the Unknown domain and Ama80 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Kokomilano44 (Unknown) and Nostradis62 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. "
I'm considering a case between Bella73 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa03 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. "
I'm considering a case between Laayouni51 in the Unknown domain and Ral16 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Salha05 (Unknown) and Euro51 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. "
I'm considering a case between Univers98 in the Unknown domain and Liberty54 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. Legally, you can consider: Les articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, ainsi que l'article 148.2 de la loi 17.97."
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,07 (Unknown) and Bazar90 (Unknown).","Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: Les articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, ainsi que l'article 148.2 de la loi 17.97."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Univers59 (Unknown) and Ste50 (Unknown).,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean38 from the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo31 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The opposing party argues the similarity in phonetic and visual aspects between 'CLEAN & FRESH' and 'CLEAN & FRESCH'. They claim that the opposed brand has similar sounding, which could lead to confusion among their customers.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Nostradis73 from the Unknown domain and Ama01 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les produits couverts par les deux signes sont identiques. Les deux signes en question comportent des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires.. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama23 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano08 from the Unknown domain?,Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Nostradis48 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni81 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro37 from the Unknown domain and Moto27 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
"Can you provide arguments for a case involving Labindus,47 from the Unknown domain and Univers68 from the Unknown domain?","From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I'm considering a case between Ama71 in the Unknown domain and Ama46 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Salha16 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis35 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97."
I'm considering a case between Anaqa41 in the Unknown domain and Kokomilano52 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Newprotect38 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano44 from the Unknown domain?,Based on similarity: La société KOKOMILANO oppose à la demande d'enregistrement de la marque « CRYSTAL MONICA » sur la base de la similitude exacte entre les deux marques.. 
I'm considering a case between Nostradis60 in the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo45 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,
"I'm considering a case between Labindus,62 in the Unknown domain and Univers28 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?","Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: The case is based on Article 148.2 and 184 of law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property, along with consumer protection laws (law n°31-08)."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Anaqa94 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni62 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa87 (Unknown) and Anaqa24 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella03 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation70 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is launched based on article 148.2 of law №17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as amended and supplemented by laws №31-05 and 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar89 (Unknown) and Kokomilano70 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bella49 (Unknown) and Liberty75 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Moto78 (Unknown) and Laayouni48 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Salha11 (Unknown) and Bellakhdar22 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
I'm considering a case between Sulfonation48 in the Unknown domain and Moto26 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Nostradis79 from the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo89 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Nostradis24 (Unknown) and Newprotect72 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Sulfonation83 from the Unknown domain and Bellakhdar54 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.."
I'm considering a case between Salha02 in the Unknown domain and Clean27 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar72 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo21 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The opposition indicates that the consumer relevant could perceive the contested trademark as a sub-brand or variant of the previous mark. It is common for companies to make variations of their brands, for example, by adding terms or elements, to designate new product ranges or to create a modernized version. The opponent believes that the registration of the trademark clearly infringes their legitimate rights.. Legally, you can consider: Loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Laayouni52 from the Unknown domain and Salha76 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. "
I'm considering a case between Moto95 in the Unknown domain and Boussafa21 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques contiennent les mêmes éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants, présentent des similitudes sur le plan dénominatif, phonétique, visuel et conceptuel.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Salha59 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect71 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus97 (Unknown) and Clean91 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13."
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus85 (Unknown) and Labindus,43 (Unknown).","Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kayna75 from the Unknown domain and Liberty87 from the Unknown domain?,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Liberty14 from the Unknown domain and Ama00 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bazar19 from the Unknown domain and Ste82 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.."
I'm considering a case between Ferbalmo90 in the Unknown domain and Ama12 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. "
I'm considering a case between Moto40 in the Unknown domain and Nostradis68 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: Loi marocaine 17-97 relative à la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05."
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,63 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo62 (Unknown).","Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral23 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis64 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ferbalmo88 (Unknown) and Laayouni99 (Unknown).,
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Bazar63 (Unknown) and Labindus,72 (Unknown).","Based on similarity: The opposing party argues the similarity in phonetic and visual aspects between 'CLEAN & FRESH' and 'CLEAN & FRESCH'. They claim that the opposed brand has similar sounding, which could lead to confusion among their customers.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving L'opposant89 from the Unknown domain and Ral75 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I'm considering a case between Kokomilano45 in the Unknown domain and Univers98 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Laayouni45 (Unknown) and Nostradis24 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The opposition indicates that the consumer relevant could perceive the contested trademark as a sub-brand or variant of the previous mark. It is common for companies to make variations of their brands, for example, by adding terms or elements, to designate new product ranges or to create a modernized version. The opponent believes that the registration of the trademark clearly infringes their legitimate rights.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro71 from the Unknown domain and Bellakhdar08 from the Unknown domain?,
I'm considering a case between Boussafa30 in the Unknown domain and Newprotect85 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. "
I'm considering a case between Anaqa88 in the Unknown domain and Univers44 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. L'opposition est justifiée par un risque potentiel de confusion entre les marques et des préjudices potentiels pour le titulaire de la marque existante.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Anaqa75 (Unknown) and Bellakhdar50 (Unknown).,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation71 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo41 (Unknown).,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Salha19 from the Unknown domain and Bella29 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Kokomilano35 (Unknown) and Sulfonation82 (Unknown).,
I'm considering a case between Boussafa13 in the Unknown domain and Bella42 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean74 from the Unknown domain and Anaqa40 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Loi 17-97, telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05, donnant droit à tout titulaire de droit antérieur, d'intenter une action en opposition contre une demande d'enregistrement d'une marque qui lui est préjudiciable. Plus particulièrement les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de la loi 17-97 sont cités.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar52 from the Unknown domain and Morus83 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques contiennent les mêmes éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants, présentent des similitudes sur le plan dénominatif, phonétique, visuel et conceptuel.. From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Morus71 from the Unknown domain and Ama74 from the Unknown domain?,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ferbalmo01 from the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo68 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Clean64 (Unknown) and Euro61 (Unknown).,"Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.."
I'm considering a case between Ral01 in the Unknown domain and Nostradis84 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle (Maroc)."
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Clean89 (Unknown) and Labindus,29 (Unknown).","Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Morus50 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect30 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean00 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano23 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97."
I'm considering a case between Newprotect99 in the Unknown domain and Morus34 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Morus79 from the Unknown domain and Kayna80 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty73 (Unknown) and Anaqa98 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Kayna11 (Unknown) and Morus88 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ama36 (Unknown) and Newprotect87 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ral19 (Unknown) and Ste07 (Unknown).,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Liberty28 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano07 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation88 (Unknown) and Ral76 (Unknown).,Based on similarity: Les produits couverts par les deux signes sont identiques. Les deux signes en question comportent des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Newprotect93 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect75 from the Unknown domain?,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Salha24 from the Unknown domain and Univers19 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ral01 (Unknown) and Clean10 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
I'm considering a case between Ral76 in the Unknown domain and Laayouni65 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La société KOKOMILANO oppose à la demande d'enregistrement de la marque « CRYSTAL MONICA » sur la base de la similitude exacte entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
I'm considering a case between Kayna90 in the Unknown domain and Nostradis65 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Anaqa16 (Unknown) and Newprotect26 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: The case is based on Article 148.2 and 184 of law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property, along with consumer protection laws (law n°31-08)."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste26 (Unknown) and Kayna72 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La document mentionne une comparaison des produits et services, ainsi qu'une comparaison des signes sur le plan verbal, phonétique et visuel, mais sans donner de détails spécifiques.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar07 from the Unknown domain and Bella30 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is launched based on article 148.2 of law №17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as amended and supplemented by laws №31-05 and 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa38 (Unknown) and Kokomilano24 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I'm considering a case between Moto54 in the Unknown domain and Univers02 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
I'm considering a case between Kayna01 in the Unknown domain and Boussafa89 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. 
I'm considering a case between Ama50 in the Unknown domain and Kayna76 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.."
I'm considering a case between Liberty56 in the Unknown domain and Ama72 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Anaqa26 (Unknown) and Kokomilano80 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty01 (Unknown) and Sulfonation48 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
"Can you provide arguments for a case involving Labindus,84 from the Unknown domain and Morus78 from the Unknown domain?","Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. Legally, you can consider: l’article 148.2 sur le droit d’opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
I'm considering a case between Nostradis10 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa75 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kayna75 from the Unknown domain and Clean03 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama86 from the Unknown domain and Moto63 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bella45 (Unknown) and Morus80 (Unknown).,"Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.."
I'm considering a case between Salha88 in the Unknown domain and Ama82 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. "
I'm considering a case between Clean89 in the Unknown domain and Morus25 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty70 (Unknown) and Anaqa20 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: L'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I'm considering a case between L'opposant74 in the Unknown domain and Bellakhdar31 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste15 (Unknown) and Ste38 (Unknown).,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ferbalmo49 from the Unknown domain and Bella29 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bazar34 (Unknown) and Sulfonation08 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I'm considering a case between Liberty05 in the Unknown domain and Newprotect92 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ste15 from the Unknown domain and Morus74 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar90 from the Unknown domain and Moto73 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.."
I'm considering a case between Salha84 in the Unknown domain and Kayna05 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is based on Article 148.2 of Law No. 17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws 31-05 and 23-13, giving the right of action in opposition to any right holder against a registration request of a brand that is harmful to them.."
I'm considering a case between Ste70 in the Unknown domain and Bazar15 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Boussafa06 from the Unknown domain and Ste58 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ral58 (Unknown) and Sulfonation81 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella94 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni37 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I'm considering a case between Newprotect51 in the Unknown domain and Nostradis57 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. "
I'm considering a case between Ferbalmo66 in the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo83 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kayna89 from the Unknown domain and Morus29 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Kayna16 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo48 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is based on Article 148.2 of law n°17-97 relating to the protection of industrial property as amended and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13. This article gives the right to oppose any trademark registration application deemed prejudicial to an existing rights holder.."
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus13 (Unknown) and Labindus,72 (Unknown).","From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Newprotect08 from the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo50 from the Unknown domain?,Based on similarity: La société KOKOMILANO oppose à la demande d'enregistrement de la marque « CRYSTAL MONICA » sur la base de la similitude exacte entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. 
I'm considering a case between Univers34 in the Unknown domain and Ste95 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kokomilano16 from the Unknown domain and Ral23 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Univers18 (Unknown) and Bazar73 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97."
I'm considering a case between Sulfonation15 in the Unknown domain and Kayna34 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar93 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect37 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: The case is based on Article 148.2 and 184 of law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property, along with consumer protection laws (law n°31-08)."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama87 from the Unknown domain and Kayna75 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The opposition indicates that the consumer relevant could perceive the contested trademark as a sub-brand or variant of the previous mark. It is common for companies to make variations of their brands, for example, by adding terms or elements, to designate new product ranges or to create a modernized version. The opponent believes that the registration of the trademark clearly infringes their legitimate rights.. From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. "
I'm considering a case between Ral07 in the Unknown domain and Liberty66 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Univers23 from the Unknown domain and Ral45 from the Unknown domain?,From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean45 from the Unknown domain and Moto73 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Legally, you can consider: Loi 17/97 modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, article 148.2."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Univers62 from the Unknown domain and Kayna59 from the Unknown domain?,Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. 
I'm considering a case between Sulfonation24 in the Unknown domain and Kokomilano64 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. 
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,09 (Unknown) and Anaqa16 (Unknown).",
I'm considering a case between Nostradis34 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa87 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
I'm considering a case between Kokomilano73 in the Unknown domain and Kayna16 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13."
I'm considering a case between Boussafa04 in the Unknown domain and Bazar82 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar83 (Unknown) and Ama85 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Nostradis38 (Unknown) and Euro08 (Unknown).,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ral08 (Unknown) and Bella79 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bazar31 (Unknown) and L'opposant50 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro94 from the Unknown domain and Bella86 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is launched based on article 148.2 of law №17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as amended and supplemented by laws №31-05 and 23-13.."
I'm considering a case between Euro76 in the Unknown domain and Moto14 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral86 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation87 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The opposition indicates that the consumer relevant could perceive the contested trademark as a sub-brand or variant of the previous mark. It is common for companies to make variations of their brands, for example, by adding terms or elements, to designate new product ranges or to create a modernized version. The opponent believes that the registration of the trademark clearly infringes their legitimate rights.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella12 from the Unknown domain and Morus38 from the Unknown domain?,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral41 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis07 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques contiennent les mêmes éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants, présentent des similitudes sur le plan dénominatif, phonétique, visuel et conceptuel.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar20 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect85 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar76 (Unknown) and Liberty01 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kayna85 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano86 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Boussafa74 from the Unknown domain and Bazar73 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste90 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo90 (Unknown).,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro57 from the Unknown domain and Liberty40 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. Legally, you can consider: Les articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, ainsi que l'article 148.2 de la loi 17.97."
I'm considering a case between Anaqa57 in the Unknown domain and Sulfonation20 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is based on Article 148.2 of Law No. 17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws 31-05 and 23-13, giving the right of action in opposition to any right holder against a registration request of a brand that is harmful to them.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella10 from the Unknown domain and Ste64 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving L'opposant83 (Unknown) and Morus50 (Unknown).,
I'm considering a case between Ral01 in the Unknown domain and Salha59 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Anaqa49 (Unknown) and Ama56 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Moto68 from the Unknown domain and Bellakhdar23 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro54 (Unknown) and Moto05 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Sulfonation58 from the Unknown domain and Boussafa50 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella75 from the Unknown domain and Univers89 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kokomilano61 from the Unknown domain and L'opposant92 from the Unknown domain?,Based on similarity: La société KOKOMILANO oppose à la demande d'enregistrement de la marque « CRYSTAL MONICA » sur la base de la similitude exacte entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Univers58 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo49 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ste46 from the Unknown domain and Moto03 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. L'opposition est justifiée par un risque potentiel de confusion entre les marques et des préjudices potentiels pour le titulaire de la marque existante.."
"Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro08 from the Unknown domain and Labindus,07 from the Unknown domain?","Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. L'opposition est justifiée par un risque potentiel de confusion entre les marques et des préjudices potentiels pour le titulaire de la marque existante.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa49 (Unknown) and Univers59 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. Legally, you can consider: La société RAL TRADE invoque les dispositions de l'article 148.2 de la loi 17-97 modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. Les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de ladite loi sont cités en relation avec la contrefaçon de la marque.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ferbalmo33 from the Unknown domain and Ste07 from the Unknown domain?,
I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus02 (Unknown) and Bella64 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques contiennent les mêmes éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants, présentent des similitudes sur le plan dénominatif, phonétique, visuel et conceptuel.. From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. Legally, you can consider: Loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, en particulier l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition."
"I'm considering a case between Labindus,03 in the Unknown domain and Kayna99 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?","From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle (Maroc)."
I'm considering a case between Salha95 in the Unknown domain and Euro80 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama74 from the Unknown domain and Euro56 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. Legally, you can consider: La société RAL TRADE invoque les dispositions de l'article 148.2 de la loi 17-97 modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. Les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de ladite loi sont cités en relation avec la contrefaçon de la marque.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty62 (Unknown) and Ama32 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: Les produits couverts par les deux signes sont identiques. Les deux signes en question comportent des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires.. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ferbalmo26 (Unknown) and Clean82 (Unknown).,From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus80 (Unknown) and Bella54 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama50 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano43 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kokomilano45 from the Unknown domain and L'opposant56 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La document mentionne une comparaison des produits et services, ainsi qu'une comparaison des signes sur le plan verbal, phonétique et visuel, mais sans donner de détails spécifiques.. From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ferbalmo92 (Unknown) and Kayna88 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bella21 (Unknown) and Anaqa81 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. "
I'm considering a case between Ste30 in the Unknown domain and Salha18 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella54 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano55 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. Legally, you can consider: The case is based on Article 148.2 and 184 of law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property, along with consumer protection laws (law n°31-08)."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean13 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect46 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Anaqa98 (Unknown) and Laayouni85 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella05 from the Unknown domain and Morus69 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
I'm considering a case between Laayouni51 in the Unknown domain and Nostradis45 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is based on Article 148.2 of Law No. 17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws 31-05 and 23-13, giving the right of action in opposition to any right holder against a registration request of a brand that is harmful to them.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ste28 from the Unknown domain and Ste25 from the Unknown domain?,
I'm considering a case between Liberty23 in the Unknown domain and Moto28 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
I'm considering a case between Nostradis35 in the Unknown domain and Univers48 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Laayouni77 (Unknown) and Bella87 (Unknown).,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Boussafa71 from the Unknown domain and Salha63 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. "
I'm considering a case between Boussafa38 in the Unknown domain and Kayna61 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97."
I'm considering a case between Ferbalmo43 in the Unknown domain and Morus50 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: The opposition is based on Article 148.2 of Law No. 17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws 31-05 and 23-13, giving the right of action in opposition to any right holder against a registration request of a brand that is harmful to them.."
I'm considering a case between Newprotect06 in the Unknown domain and Salha30 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: L'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Anaqa25 (Unknown) and Boussafa51 (Unknown).,"Legally, you can consider: Loi marocaine 17-97 relative à la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05."
I'm considering a case between Sulfonation21 in the Unknown domain and Liberty41 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
I'm considering a case between Bella76 in the Unknown domain and Morus14 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar43 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano68 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation83 (Unknown) and L'opposant97 (Unknown).,"Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Moto84 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation51 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. Legally, you can consider: La société RAL TRADE invoque les dispositions de l'article 148.2 de la loi 17-97 modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. Les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de ladite loi sont cités en relation avec la contrefaçon de la marque.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ferbalmo63 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni49 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving L'opposant48 from the Unknown domain and Bazar59 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Loi 17/97 modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, article 148.2."
I'm considering a case between Salha50 in the Unknown domain and Laayouni48 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,
I'm considering a case between Morus48 in the Unknown domain and Univers07 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The opposition indicates that the consumer relevant could perceive the contested trademark as a sub-brand or variant of the previous mark. It is common for companies to make variations of their brands, for example, by adding terms or elements, to designate new product ranges or to create a modernized version. The opponent believes that the registration of the trademark clearly infringes their legitimate rights.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is based on Article 148.2 of Law No. 17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws 31-05 and 23-13, giving the right of action in opposition to any right holder against a registration request of a brand that is harmful to them.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Moto86 from the Unknown domain and Boussafa27 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle (Maroc)."
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa20 (Unknown) and Labindus,90 (Unknown).",
I'm considering a case between Bazar91 in the Unknown domain and Bazar33 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Legally, you can consider: Loi 17/97 modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, article 148.2."
"Can you provide arguments for a case involving Labindus,42 from the Unknown domain and Ral00 from the Unknown domain?",From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. 
"I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus41 (Unknown) and Labindus,25 (Unknown).",From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral27 from the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo12 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.."
I'm considering a case between Salha30 in the Unknown domain and Newprotect85 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. "
I'm considering a case between Ral15 in the Unknown domain and Moto76 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro87 (Unknown) and Kokomilano48 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Moto72 from the Unknown domain and Anaqa21 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Kayna81 (Unknown) and Morus84 (Unknown).,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama31 from the Unknown domain and Kayna28 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Kayna75 (Unknown) and Univers46 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa55 (Unknown) and Moto87 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. "
"I'm considering a case between Anaqa86 in the Unknown domain and Labindus,76 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?","Based on similarity: Les deux marques contiennent les mêmes éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants, présentent des similitudes sur le plan dénominatif, phonétique, visuel et conceptuel.. From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Boussafa95 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect50 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Clean59 (Unknown) and Laayouni36 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa14 (Unknown) and Anaqa54 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13."
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean91 from the Unknown domain and Anaqa47 from the Unknown domain?,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama64 from the Unknown domain and Ste16 from the Unknown domain?,Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving L'opposant86 (Unknown) and Ste97 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ral64 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo63 (Unknown).,Based on similarity: La société KOKOMILANO oppose à la demande d'enregistrement de la marque « CRYSTAL MONICA » sur la base de la similitude exacte entre les deux marques.. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Nostradis58 from the Unknown domain and Ral55 from the Unknown domain?,From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. 
I'm considering a case between Newprotect23 in the Unknown domain and Bella32 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation45 (Unknown) and Kokomilano88 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. Legally, you can consider: La société RAL TRADE invoque les dispositions de l'article 148.2 de la loi 17-97 modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. Les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de ladite loi sont cités en relation avec la contrefaçon de la marque.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa55 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo23 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation75 (Unknown) and Ama12 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Moto34 (Unknown) and Ste11 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: Loi 17/97 modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, article 148.2."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ama01 (Unknown) and Ste03 (Unknown).,Based on similarity: Les produits couverts par les deux signes sont identiques. Les deux signes en question comportent des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires.. From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document. 
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Sulfonation02 from the Unknown domain and Ral84 from the Unknown domain?,"Legally, you can consider: La société RAL TRADE invoque les dispositions de l'article 148.2 de la loi 17-97 modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. Les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de ladite loi sont cités en relation avec la contrefaçon de la marque.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Nostradis34 (Unknown) and Euro09 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste26 (Unknown) and Bellakhdar24 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste97 (Unknown) and Bazar67 (Unknown).,
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ste06 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni96 from the Unknown domain?,"From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle."
I'm considering a case between Euro44 in the Unknown domain and Moto75 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro87 (Unknown) and Salha90 (Unknown).,
I'm considering a case between Bellakhdar59 in the Unknown domain and Bazar21 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. "
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Univers18 from the Unknown domain and Bella80 from the Unknown domain?,"Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. "
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect66 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo26 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. "
I'm considering a case between Ral36 in the Unknown domain and Ral49 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. 
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect89 (Unknown) and Ral80 (Unknown).,"Based on similarity: The opposition indicates that the consumer relevant could perceive the contested trademark as a sub-brand or variant of the previous mark. It is common for companies to make variations of their brands, for example, by adding terms or elements, to designate new product ranges or to create a modernized version. The opponent believes that the registration of the trademark clearly infringes their legitimate rights.. "
"Can you provide arguments for a case involving L'opposant18 from the Unknown domain and Labindus,09 from the Unknown domain?","Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect69 (Unknown) and Ste88 (Unknown).,"From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is based on Article 148.2 of law n°17-97 relating to the protection of industrial property as amended and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13. This article gives the right to oppose any trademark registration application deemed prejudicial to an existing rights holder.."
I'm considering a case between Moto67 in the Unknown domain and Bazar07 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use?,"Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13."