source_feminine: She argues that not highlighting the degree to which the nobility was divided was a deliberate policy, but the involvement of the Queen meant there had to be a formal recognition...that there were two opposing camps.
reference_feminine: Arguye que no destacar el grado en que la nobleza estaba dividida era una política deliberada, pero la participación de la reina significaba que tenía que haber un reconocimiento formal... que había dos campos opuestos.
source_masculine: He argues that not highlighting the degree to which the nobility was divided was a deliberate policy, but the involvement of the King meant there had to be a formal recognition...that there were two opposing camps.
reference_masculine: Arguye que no destacar el grado en que la nobleza estaba dividida era una política deliberada, pero la participación del rey significaba que tenía que haber un reconocimiento formal... que había dos campos opuestos.
source_feminine_annotated: <F>She</F> argues that not highlighting the degree to which the nobility was divided was a deliberate policy, but the involvement of the <F>Queen</F> meant there had to be a formal recognition...that there were two opposing camps.
reference_feminine_annotated: Arguye que no destacar el grado en que la nobleza estaba dividida era una política deliberada, pero la participación <F>de la reina</F> significaba que tenía que haber un reconocimiento formal... que había dos campos opuestos.
source_masculine_annotated: <M>He</M> argues that not highlighting the degree to which the nobility was divided was a deliberate policy, but the involvement of the <M>King</M> meant there had to be a formal recognition...that there were two opposing camps.
reference_masculine_annotated: Arguye que no destacar el grado en que la nobleza estaba dividida era una política deliberada, pero la participación <M>del rey</M> significaba que tenía que haber un reconocimiento formal... que había dos campos opuestos.
reference_feminine_keywords: de la reina
reference_masculine_keywords: del rey