LennardZuendorf commited on
Commit
474e8a5
·
1 Parent(s): 472e616

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +63 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -39,4 +39,67 @@ dataset_info:
39
  num_examples: 4954
40
  download_size: 172182482
41
  dataset_size: 353311150
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
42
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
39
  num_examples: 4954
40
  download_size: 172182482
41
  dataset_size: 353311150
42
+ task_categories:
43
+ - text-classification
44
+ language:
45
+ - de
46
+ tags:
47
+ - legal
48
+ pretty_name: Edited German Court case decision
49
+ size_categories:
50
+ - 1K<n<10K
51
  ---
52
+
53
+ # Dataset Card for openlegaldata.io bulk case data
54
+
55
+ ## Dataset Description
56
+
57
+ This is a edit/cleanup of Bulk Data of [openlegaldata.io](https://de.openlegaldata.io/), which I also brought onto Huggingface [here](LennardZuendorf/openlegaldata-bulk-data).
58
+
59
+ #### The Entire Dataset Is In German
60
+
61
+ - **Github Repository:**
62
+ - **Repository:** [Bulk Data](https://static.openlegaldata.io/dumps/de/)
63
+
64
+ ## Edit Summary
65
+
66
+ I have done some cleaning and splitting of the data and filtered out large parts that were not (easily) usable, cutting down the number of cases to at max 4000 - from 250000. This results in two different splits. Which is because German Courts don't format their case decision the same way.
67
+
68
+ ### Data Fields
69
+
70
+ Independent of the split, most fields are the same, they are:
71
+
72
+ | id | court | file_number | date | type | content
73
+ | - | - | - | - | - | - |
74
+ | numeric id | name of the court that made the decision | file number of the case ("Aktenzeichen") | decision date | type of the case decision | entire content (text) of the case decision
75
+
76
+ Additionally, I added 3 more fields because of the splitting of the content:
77
+
78
+ #### Two Split
79
+
80
+ - Case Decision I could split into two parts: tenor and reasoning.
81
+ - Which means the three fields tenor, content and facts contain the following:
82
+
83
+ | tenor | reasoning | facts
84
+ | - | - | - |
85
+ | An abstract, legal summary of the cases decision | the entire rest of the decision, explaining in detail why the decision has been made | an empty text field |
86
+
87
+ #### Three Split
88
+
89
+ - Case Decision I could split into three parts: tenor, reasoning and facts
90
+ - This Data I have used to create binary labels with the help of ChatGPT, see [legalis](https://huggingface.co/datasets/LennardZuendorf/legalis) for that
91
+ - The three fields tenor, content and facts contain the following:
92
+
93
+ | tenor | reasoning | facts
94
+ | - | - | - |
95
+ | An abstract, legal summary of the cases decision | the entire rest of the decision, explaining in detail why the decision has been made | the facts and details of a case |
96
+
97
+ ### Languages
98
+
99
+ - German
100
+
101
+ ## Additional Information
102
+
103
+ ### Licensing/Citation Information
104
+
105
+ The [openlegaldata platform](https://github.com/openlegaldata/oldp) is licensed under the MIT license, you can access the dataset by citing the original source, [openlegaldata.io](https://de.openlegaldata.io/) and me, [Lennard Zündorf](https://github.com/LennardZuendorf) as the editor of this dataset.