DaidalosTeam commited on
Commit
4013c01
1 Parent(s): af39ef4

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +393 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,393 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: agpl-3.0
3
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: agpl-3.0
3
+ ---
4
+ Datasheet: Herodotos Project Dataset
5
+
6
+ For what purpose was the dataset created? Was there a specific task in
7
+ mind? Was there a specific gap that needed to be filled? Please provide
8
+ a description.
9
+
10
+ - created for Herodotos Project to train NER-Tagger (BiLSTM CRF; see:
11
+ Alexander Erdmann, David Joseph Wrisley, Benjamin Allen, Christopher
12
+ Brown, Sophie Cohen Bodénès, Micha Elsner, Yukun Feng, Brian Joseph,
13
+ Béatrice Joyeaux-Prunel and Marie-Catherine de Marneffe. 2019.
14
+ "[Practical, Efficient, and Customizable Active Learning for Named
15
+ Entity Recognition in the Digital
16
+ Humanities](https://github.com/alexerdmann/HER/blob/master/HER_NAACL2019_preprint.pdf)."
17
+ In Proceedings of North American Association of Computational
18
+ Linguistics (NAACL 2019). Minneapolis, Minnesota.)
19
+
20
+ - Goal of Herodotos Project: catalogue and compendium of ancient ethnic
21
+ groups
22
+
23
+ - For more info on the corpus see:
24
+ https://aclanthology.org/W16-4012.pdf
25
+
26
+ Who created the dataset (e.g., which team, research group) and on behalf
27
+ of which entity (e.g., company, institution, organization)?
28
+
29
+ - from the documentation: „The data files in the **Annotation** directory
30
+ were annotated for named entities by a team of Classics experts at Ohio
31
+ State University. Texts presently included are excerpts from Caesar's
32
+ Wars, both Gallic (GW) and Civil (CW), the Plinies' writings, both
33
+ Elder and Younger, and Ovid's Ars Amatoria. "
34
+
35
+ Who funded the creation of the dataset? If there is an associated grant,
36
+ please provide the name of the grantor and the grant name and number.
37
+
38
+ - unknown
39
+
40
+ Any other comments?
41
+
42
+ - No
43
+
44
+ What do the instances that comprise the dataset represent (e.g.,
45
+ documents, photos, people, countries)? Are there multiple types of
46
+ instances (e.g., movies, users, and ratings; people and interactions
47
+ between them; nodes and edges)? Please provide a description.
48
+
49
+ - Latin texts "Texts presently included are excerpts from Caesar's Wars, both Gallic (GW) and Civil (CW), the Plinies' writings, both Elder and Younger, and Ovid's Ars Amatoria."
50
+
51
+ How many instances are there in total (of each type, if appropriate)?
52
+
53
+ - 146,066 words
54
+
55
+ Does the dataset contain all po-ssible instances or is it a sample (not
56
+ necessarily random) of instances from a larger set? If the dataset is a
57
+ sample, then what is the larger set? Is the sample representative of the
58
+ larger set (e.g., geographic coverage)? If so, please describe how this representativeness was validated/verified. If it is not
59
+ representative of the larger set, please describe why not (e.g., to
60
+ cover a more diverse range of instances, because instances were withheld
61
+ or unavailable).
62
+
63
+ - sample of Latin literature (see previous answers), representative of
64
+ Classical Latin literature, might not be representative of the entire Latin
65
+ literature (time, geography)
66
+
67
+ What data does each instance consist of? "Raw" data (e.g., unprocessed
68
+ text or images) or features? In either case, please provide a
69
+ description.
70
+
71
+ - Each instance consists of raw text data
72
+
73
+ Is there a label or target associated with each instance? If so, please
74
+ provide a description.
75
+
76
+ - NER Labels: PRS-B, PRS-I, GEO-B, GEO-I, GRP-B, GRP-I or 0
77
+ - labels follow the BIO scheme
78
+ - see also: https://aclanthology.org/W16-4012.pdf
79
+
80
+ Is any information missing from individual instances? If so, please
81
+ provide a description, explaining why this information is missing (e.g.,
82
+ because it was unavailable). This does not include intentionally removed
83
+ information, but might include, e.g., redacted text.
84
+
85
+ - No
86
+
87
+ Are relationships between individual instances made explicit (e.g.,
88
+ users' movie ratings, social network links)? If so, please describe how
89
+ these relationships are made explicit.
90
+
91
+ - Relationships are made explicit according to the BIO scheme
92
+
93
+ Are there recommended data splits (e.g., training,
94
+ development/validation, testing)? If so, please provide a description of
95
+ these splits, explaining the rationale behind them.
96
+
97
+ - Text from Gallic War is split into test and train sets
98
+
99
+ Are there any errors, sources of noise, or redundancies in the dataset?
100
+ If so, please provide a description.
101
+
102
+ - Naturally occurring repetitions of names in the texts
103
+
104
+ Is the dataset self-contained, or does it link to or otherwise rely on
105
+ external resources (e.g., websites, tweets, other datasets)? If it links
106
+ to or relies on external resources, a) are there guarantees that they
107
+ will exist, and remain constant, over time; b) are there official
108
+ archival versions of the complete dataset (i.e., including the external
109
+ resources as they existed at the time the dataset was created); c) are
110
+ there any restrictions (e.g., licenses, fees) associated with any of the
111
+ external resources that might apply to a dataset consumer? Please
112
+ provide descriptions of all external resources and any restrictions
113
+ associated with them, as well as links or other access points, as appropriate.
114
+
115
+ - The dataset is self-contained and can be downloaded from GitHub
116
+ (https://github.com/Herodotos-Project/Herodotos-Project-Latin-NER-Tagger-Annotation/blob/master/README.md)
117
+
118
+ Does the dataset contain data that might be considered confidential
119
+ (e.g., data that is protected by legal privilege or by doctor--patient
120
+ confidentiality, data that includes the content of individuals'
121
+ non-public communications)? If so, please provide a description.
122
+
123
+ - No
124
+
125
+ Does the dataset contain data that, if viewed directly, might be
126
+ offensive, insulting, threatening, or might otherwise cause anxiety? If
127
+ so, please describe why. If the dataset does not relate to people, you
128
+ may skip the remaining questions in this section.
129
+
130
+ - The dataset contains descriptions of war.
131
+
132
+ Does the dataset identify any subpopulations (e.g., by age, gender)? If
133
+ so, please describe how these subpopulations are identified and provide
134
+ a description of their respective distributions within the dataset.
135
+
136
+ - A number of ethnic groups from antiquity are referred to.
137
+
138
+ Is it possible to identify individuals (i.e., one or more natural
139
+ persons), either directly or indirectly (i.e., in combination with other
140
+ data) from the dataset? If so, please describe how.
141
+
142
+ - Only historical individuals
143
+
144
+ Does the dataset contain data that might be considered sensitive in any
145
+ way (e.g., data that reveals race or ethnic origins, sexual
146
+ orientations, religious beliefs, political opinions or union
147
+ memberships, or locations; financial or health data; biometric or
148
+ genetic data; forms of government identification, such as social
149
+ security numbers; criminal history)? If so, please provide a
150
+ description.
151
+
152
+ - Only historical individuals
153
+
154
+ Any other comments?
155
+
156
+ - No
157
+
158
+ How was the data associated with each instance acquired? Was the data
159
+ directly observable (e.g., raw text, movie ratings), reported by
160
+ subjects (e.g., survey responses), or indirectly inferred/derived from
161
+ other data (e.g., part-of-speech tags, model-based guesses for age or
162
+ language)?
163
+
164
+ - The data consists of publicly available texts
165
+
166
+ If the data was reported by subjects or indirectly inferred/derived from
167
+ other data, was the data validated/verified? If so, please describe how.
168
+
169
+ - unknown
170
+
171
+ What mechanisms or procedures were used to collect the data (e.g.,
172
+ hardware apparatuses or sensors, manual human curation, software
173
+ programs, software APIs)? How were these mechanisms or procedures
174
+ validated?
175
+
176
+ - from the documentation: „All texts are in Latin taken from the [Latin
177
+ Library Collection](https://www.theLatinlibrary.com/) (collected by
178
+ [CLTK](https://github.com/cltk/Latin_text_Latin_library)) or the
179
+ [Perseus Latin
180
+ Collection](http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/collection?collection=Perseus:collection:Greco-Roman).
181
+ "
182
+
183
+ If the dataset is a sample from a larger set, what was the sampling
184
+ strategy (e.g., deterministic, probabilistic with specific sampling
185
+ probabilities)?
186
+
187
+ - unknown
188
+
189
+ Who was involved in the data collection process (e.g., students,
190
+ crowdworkers, contractors) and how were they compensated (e.g., how much
191
+ were crowdworkers paid)?
192
+
193
+ - <https://aclanthology.org/W16-4012.pdf> S. 87: "an undergraduate, a
194
+ graduate, and a professor of Classics, each with at least 4 years of
195
+ experience studying Latin"
196
+
197
+ Over what timeframe was the data collected? Does this timeframe match
198
+ the creation timeframe of the data associated with the instances (e.g.,
199
+ recent crawl of old news articles)? If not, please describe the
200
+ timeframe in which the data associated with the instances was created.
201
+ Were any ethical review processes conducted (e.g., by an institutional
202
+ review board)? If so, please provide a description of these review
203
+ processes, including the outcomes, as well as a link or other access
204
+ point to any supporting documentation. If the dataset does not relate to
205
+ people, you may skip the remaining questions in this section.
206
+
207
+ - unknown
208
+
209
+ Did you collect the data from the individuals in question directly, or
210
+ obtain it via third parties or other sources (e.g., websites)? Were the
211
+ individuals in question notified about the data collection? If so,
212
+ please describe (or show with screenshots or other information) how
213
+ notice was provided, and provide a link or other access point to, or
214
+ otherwise reproduce, the exact language of the notification itself.
215
+
216
+ - not applicable
217
+
218
+ Did the individuals in question consent to the collection and use of
219
+ their data? If so, please describe (or show with screenshots or other
220
+ information) how consent was requested and provided, and provide a link
221
+ or other access point to, or otherwise reproduce, the exact language to
222
+ which the individuals consented.
223
+
224
+ - not applicable
225
+
226
+ If consent was obtained, were the consenting individuals provided with a
227
+ mechanism to revoke their consent in the future or for certain uses? If
228
+ so, please provide a description, as well as a link or other access
229
+ point to the mechanism (if appropriate).
230
+
231
+ - not applicable
232
+
233
+ Has an analysis of the potential impact of the dataset and its use on
234
+ data subjects (e.g., a data protection impact analysis) been conducted?
235
+ If so, please provide a description of this analysis, including the
236
+ outcomes, as well as a link or other access point to any supporting
237
+ documentation.
238
+
239
+ - not applicable
240
+
241
+ Any other comments?
242
+
243
+ - No
244
+
245
+ Preprocessing/cleaning/labeling
246
+
247
+ Was any preprocessing/cleaning/labeling of the data done (e.g.,
248
+ discretization or bucketing, tokenization, part-of-speech tagging, SIFT
249
+ feature extraction, removal of instances, processing of missing values)?
250
+ If so, please provide a description. If not, you may skip the remainder
251
+ of the questions in this section.
252
+
253
+ - The data was manually annotated for NEs.
254
+
255
+ Was the "raw" data saved in addition to the preprocessed/cleaned/labeled
256
+ data (e.g., to support unanticipated future uses)? If so, please provide a link or other
257
+ access point to the "raw" data.
258
+
259
+ - The data can be downloaded from:
260
+ https://github.com/clmarr/Herodotos-beta/tree/f22fdd92b3318cfb8fc93b004b0947aea14ce9c2/Annotation_1-1-19
261
+
262
+ Any other comments?
263
+
264
+ -No
265
+
266
+ Uses
267
+
268
+ Has the dataset been used for any tasks already? If so, please provide a
269
+ description.
270
+
271
+ - It has been used to train an NER-Tagger for Latin. See:
272
+ <https://aclanthology.org/W16-4012.pdf> and
273
+ https://github.com/alexerdmann/HER/blob/master/HER_NAACL2019_preprint.pdf
274
+
275
+ Is there a repository that links to any or all papers or systems that
276
+ use the dataset? If so, please provide a link or other access point.
277
+ What (other) tasks could the dataset be used for?
278
+
279
+ - See:
280
+ https://github.com/alexerdmann/HER/blob/master/HER_NAACL2019_preprint.pdf
281
+
282
+ Is there anything about the composition of the dataset or the way it was
283
+ collected and preprocessed/cleaned/labeled that might impact future
284
+ uses? For example, is there anything that a dataset consumer might need
285
+ to know to avoid uses that could result in unfair treatment of
286
+ individuals or groups (e.g., stereotyping, quality of service issues) or
287
+ other risks or harms (e.g., legal risks, financial harms)? If so, please
288
+ provide a description. Is there anything a dataset consumer could do to
289
+ mitigate these risks or harms?
290
+
291
+ - Strong class imbalance (most tokens are non-entities)
292
+
293
+ Are there tasks for which the dataset should not be used? If so, please
294
+ provide a description.
295
+
296
+ - No
297
+
298
+ Any other comments?
299
+
300
+ - No
301
+
302
+ Distribution
303
+
304
+ Will the dataset be distributed to third parties outside of the entity
305
+ (e.g., company, institution, organization) on behalf of which the
306
+ dataset was created? If so, please provide a description. How will the dataset will be distributed (e.g., tarball on website, API,
307
+ GitHub)?
308
+
309
+ - The data can be downloaded from:
310
+ https://github.com/clmarr/Herodotos-beta/tree/f22fdd92b3318cfb8fc93b004b0947aea14ce9c2/Annotation_1-1-19
311
+
312
+ Does the dataset have a digital object identifier (DOI)?
313
+
314
+ - No
315
+
316
+ When will the dataset be distributed?
317
+
318
+ - The data can be downloaded from:
319
+ - <https://github.com/clmarr/Herodotos-beta/tree/f22fdd92b3318cfb8fc93b004b0947aea14ce9c2/Annotation_1-1-19>
320
+ - <https://github.com/Herodotos-Project/Herodotos-Project-Latin-NER-Tagger-Annotation>
321
+
322
+ Will the dataset be distributed under a copyright or other intellectual
323
+ property (IP) license, and/or under applicable terms of use (ToU)? If
324
+ so, please describe this license and/or ToU, and provide a link or other
325
+ access point to, or otherwise reproduce, any relevant licensing terms or
326
+ ToU, as well as any fees associated with these restrictions.
327
+
328
+ - [AGPL-3.0 license](https://github.com/Herodotos-Project/Herodotos-Project-Latin-NER-Tagger-Annotation/blob/master/LICENSE)
329
+
330
+ Have any third parties imposed IP-based or other restrictions on the
331
+ data associated with the instances? If so, please describe these
332
+ restrictions, and provide a link or other access point to, or otherwise
333
+ reproduce, any relevant licensing terms, as well as any fees associated
334
+ with these restrictions.
335
+
336
+ - unknown
337
+
338
+ Do any export controls or other regulatory restrictions apply to the
339
+ dataset or to individual instances? If so, please describe these
340
+ restrictions, and provide a link or other access point to, or otherwise
341
+ reproduce, any supporting documentation.
342
+
343
+ - unknown
344
+
345
+ Any other comments?
346
+
347
+ - No
348
+
349
+ Maintenance
350
+
351
+ Who will be supporting/hosting/maintaining the dataset?
352
+
353
+ - from the documentation: "Contact [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) or any of the co-authors with questions regarding this repository."
354
+
355
+ How can the owner/curator/manager of the dataset be contacted (e.g.,
356
+ email address)?
357
+
358
359
+
360
+ Is there an erratum? If so, please provide a link or other access point.
361
+ Will the dataset be updated (e.g., to correct labeling errors, add new
362
+ instances, delete instances)? If so, please describe how often, by whom,
363
+ and how updates will be communicated to dataset consumers (e.g., mailing
364
+ list, GitHub)?
365
+
366
+ - new instances for the Ancient Greek language will be added in the
367
+ future
368
+
369
+ If the dataset relates to people, are there applicable limits on the
370
+ retention of the data associated with the instances (e.g., were the
371
+ individuals in question told that their data would be retained for a
372
+ fixed period of time and then deleted)? If so, please describe these
373
+ limits and explain how they will be enforced.
374
+
375
+ - not applicable
376
+
377
+ Will older versions of the dataset continue to be
378
+ supported/hosted/maintained? If so, please describe how. If not, please
379
+ describe how its obsolescence will be communicated to dataset consumers.
380
+
381
+ - unknown
382
+
383
+ If others want to extend/augment/build on/contribute to the dataset, is
384
+ there a mechanism for them to do so? If so, please provide a
385
+ description. Will these contributions be validated/verified? If so, please describe how. If not, why not? Is there a process for
386
+ communicating/distributing these contributions to dataset consumers? If
387
+ so, please provide a description.
388
+
389
+ - unknown
390
+
391
+ Any other comments?
392
+
393
+ - No