bibtext: @inproceedings{
  kim2024fables,
  title={{FABLES}: Evaluating faithfulness and content selection in book-length summarization},
  author={Yekyung Kim and Yapei Chang and Marzena Karpinska and Aparna Garimella and Varun Manjunatha and Kyle Lo and Tanya Goyal and Mohit Iyyer},
  booktitle={First Conference on Language Modeling},
  year={2024},
  url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=YfHxQSoaWU}
  }
abstract: While long-context large language models (LLMs) can technically summarize book-length documents (> 100K tokens), the length and complexity of the documents have so far prohibited evaluations of input-dependent aspects like faithfulness. In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale human evaluation of faithfulness and content selection on LLM-generated summaries of fictional books. Our study mitigates the issue of data contamination by focusing on summaries of books published in 2023 or 2024, and we hire annotators who have fully read each book prior to the annotation task to minimize cost and cognitive burden. We collect FABLES, a dataset of annotations on 3,158 claims made in LLM-generated summaries of 26 books, at a cost of $5.2K USD, which allows us to rank LLM summarizers based on faithfulness: CLAUDE-3-OPUS significantly outperforms all closedsource LLMs, while the open-source MIXTRAL is on par with GPT-3.5-TURBO. An analysis of the annotations reveals that most unfaithful claims relate to events and character states, and they generally require indirect reasoning over the narrative to invalidate. While LLM-based auto-raters have proven reliable for factuality and coherence in other settings, we implement several LLM raters of faithfulness and find that none correlates strongly with human annotations, especially with regard to detecting unfaithful claims. Our experiments suggest that detecting unfaithful claims is an important future direction not only for summarization evaluation but also as a testbed for long-context understanding. Finally, we move beyond faithfulness by exploring content selection errors in book-length summarization: we develop a typology of omission errors related to crucial narrative elements and also identify a systematic over-emphasis on events occurring towards the end of the book. We release FABLES to spur further research on the evaluation of book-length summarization.
title: FABLES: Evaluating faithfulness and content selection in book-length summarization
authors: Yekyung Kim Yapei Chang Marzena Karpinska Aparna Garimella Varun Manjunatha Kyle Lo Tanya Goyal Mohit Iyyer