diff --git "a/SOCKET_DATA/jigsaw#identity_hate/test_text.txt" "b/SOCKET_DATA/jigsaw#identity_hate/test_text.txt" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/SOCKET_DATA/jigsaw#identity_hate/test_text.txt" @@ -0,0 +1,10932 @@ +COCKSUCKER BEFORE YOU PISS AROUND ON MY WORK +Bye! Don't look, come or think of comming back! Tosser. +" Re-considering 1st paragraph edit? I don't understand the reasons for 's recent edit of this article not that I'm sure that the data are necessarily ""wrong."" Rather, I'm persuaded that the strategy of introducing academic honors in the first paragraph is an unhelpful approach to this specific subject. I note that articles about other sitting Justices have been similarly ""enhanced;"" and I also believe those changes are no improvement. In support of my view that this edit should be reverted, I would invite anyone to re-visit articles written about the following pairs of jurists. A1. Benjamin Cardozo A2. Learned Hand B1. John Marshall Harlan B2. John Marshall Harlan II The question becomes: Would the current version of the Wikipedia article about any one of them or either pair be improved by academic credentials in the introductory paragraph? I think not. Perhaps it helps to repeat a wry argument Kathleen Sullivan of Stanford Law makes when she suggests that some on the Harvard Law faculty wonder how Antonin Scalia avoided learning what others have managed to grasp about the processes of judging? I would hope this anecdote gently illustrates the point. Less humorous, but an even stronger argument is the one Clarence Thomas makes when he mentions wanting to return his law degree to Yale. At a minimum, I'm questioning this edit? It deserves to be reconsidered. " +Radial symmetry Several now extinct lineages included in the Echinodermata were bilateral such as Homostelea, or even asymmetrical such as Cothurnocystis (Stylophora). - +Yes, because the mother of the child in the case against Michael Jackson was studied in here motives and reasonings and judged upon her character just as harshly as Wacko Jacko himself. Don't tell me to ignore it and incriminate myself. I am going to continue refuting the bullshit that Jayjg keeps throwing at me. 18:01, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) +Praise looked at this article about 6 months ago -much improved. ] +" BI, you said you wanted to talk At the bottom of the lead section you have written: ""Its promoter speculated in 1994 that the skyhook concept could be cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator, but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts. In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ""not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials""."" Regarding: In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ""not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials"" That statement appears to come from Ref [3] on page 10. The full quote is ""If the mass of the tether alone started to exceed 200 times the mass of the payload, then that was an indication the particular scenario being considered was not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials, although the application might become feasible in the near future as better materials become available with higher tensile strengths at higher operational temperatures."" It then goes on to say ""As we shall see, presently available commercial materials will suffice to make the HASTOL tethers needed. The primary message we want to leave with the Reader is: “We don't need magic materials like ‘Buckminster-Fuller-carbon-nanotubes’ to make the space tether facility for a HASTOL system. Existing materials will do.”"" So it would appear that you misread your reference. The tether mass of 200 times mass of the payload mass is the upper limit to the problem. Systems where the tether mass is less than 200 times the payload mass can be built with ""presently available commercial materials."" To further reinforce this the Conclusion to the report states ""The fundamental conclusion of the Phase I HASTOL study effort is that the concept is technically feasible. We have evaluated a number of alternate system configurations that will allow hypersonic air-breathing vehicle technologies to be combined with orbiting, spinning space tether technologies to provide a method of moving payloads from the surface of the Earth into Earth orbit. For more than one HASTOL architecture concept, we have developed a design solution using existing, or near-term technologies. We expect that a number of the other HASTOL architecture concepts will prove similarly technically feasible when subjected to detailed design studies. The systems are completely reusable and have the potential of drastically reducing the cost of Earth-to-orbit space access."" Regarding: ""but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts."" and ""A 2000 Boeing report on the possibillity of combining skyhooks with hypersonic planes concluded that ""In general, the non-spinning tether HyperSkyhook concept does not look competitive with the spinning tether concepts.""."" The full quote is: ""HyperSkyhook In 1995 Zubrin proposed the “Hypersonic Skyhook” as a solution to the mismatch between the attainable atmospheric speeds of a hypersonic airplane and the orbital speeds of space tethers. Since the orbital speed of the space tether decreases with increasing altitu +A Bisexual, like a homosexual or a heterosexual, is not defined by sexual activity. (Much like a 15 year old boy who is attracted to a girl sexually but has never had sex is still straight). A person who is actually sexually attracted/aroused by the same sex as well as the opposite sex is bisexual. +" Hi Thanks for our kind words. See you around ) Talk " +Check the following websites: http://www.iranchamber.com/personalities/farabi/farabi.php http://www.islam.org.br/%C2%A0al_farabi.htm http://www.superbeyin.com/sohbet/sohbet.htm +Should say something about his views as an educationalist and socialist political commentator. Link to http://www.langandlit.ualberta.ca/Fall2004/SteigelBainbridge.html mentions this a bit - he stood as an election candidate for Respect. +The statement drawn from Watchtower literature, honestly, not clandescently, not with hypocrisy, is drawn from Watchtower literature via Ray Franz's arguments and literature, and imposed into the Wikipedia article. It's too much of a coincidence that a more or less follower of Ray Franz is going to come up with a reference to Wa. literature on his own, exactly the same connection Ray Franz makes, without having first seen the connection made in Ray Franz literature. Natural Nature +Though this is certainly a small article, but it is not so inconsequential as to warrant subsuming it within the Flame Trees article. It is a discography article, and should stand alone. 22 May 2005 +06, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Yep. LOL, the [[Reformist Party (Serbia)|Reformist Party] is having another go (the 20th very last on the parliamentary election, winning less votes than notable to actually be mentioned). ) By the way, here's something very little people have figured out - the new Constitution of Serbia has been brought to enable Kosovo' secession. The 1990 Constitution barred that as a possibility, and after the Kumanovo Military-Technical Agreement was signed between NATO and FRY the SRS broke its coalition with SPS and the government collapsed, causing new elections - because that was unconstitutional, as an act of highest treason, enough to be tried from maximum sentence (which the Radicals demanded from then to his death, to have a trial in Serbia, and to be tried for treason among other reasons). This constitution releases the authorities from that weight, and they won't have to go to prison if they recognize any form of further loss of sovereignty in Kosovo. ;) 15 +Userbox Hello. A userbox you are using (Template:User queerrights) has been moved to user space per WP:GUS. The new link is and leave any questions you may still have on my talk page. Thank you. +" SORRY PUCK BUT NO ONE EVER SAID DICK WAS NUMBER ONE!! But he is clearly listed as being ""second only to Batman"" and a ""master detective and martial artist"" and been trained in all the mentioned combat discplines. No need to mention in skills/abilities about the battles he's lost and won because thats not what an encylopia is supposed to do. Also, what your problem is your going by low end showings and not HIGH end showings where he's proven more than a match for a meta like Slade and pinned Shiva down in one of his earliest appearences. " +" PD: I just have seen that apart from the article Coat of arms of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, there is also a different article named Coat of arms of Western Sahara. That shows clearly that some users here have politically-driven intentions and bad faith, although they claim to be neutral. If they were neutral, logically they would work on the ""Coat of arms of Western Sahara"" article, intead of trying to merge the two articles and messing it. " +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Allowing username change to GianLuigiPalermo . Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Request handled by: Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request." +And, of course, Peiser is more than just a social anthropologist. He's one whose recent research has focused primarily on the social aspects of climate change and is thus at least as qualified to comment on the state of consensus as a historian. Regarding his study, it hasn't been published in a peer-reviewed journal, but the results have appeared in many reliable sources. In effect, it should be treated no differently than as if Peiser himself (or any other scientist) had verbally relayed the conclusions directly to a reporter. Literally tens of thousands of Wiki articles contain such references direct quotes from scientists, which appear in no other source but through the medium of a reputable reporter. +" 29 August 2006 wow. i understand that the sentance I ""added"" was not crucial and really does not change the content. But what is this?! has the community not gotten smaller? was it not caused by the automobile? have I not sourced the statement as asked? is it not a fact? is it not information? does it not help inform people as to why foresters falls is not as large as it seemingly once was? is it not the only peice of information in the article that bridges the span of time between 1870 and present? is the usfullness of the edit the only criteria used to determine if it will be reverted or not? if so it should be noted that I simply re-added the information after it was removed. was not the removal frivilous and unwarranted? what is the problem? why insist on the absence of this statement? it is unjustifiable. it is negligible. I am re adding the information as it is: A)factual, B) sourced, and C) informative. I assume that since there is no reason to remove it again (or in the first place) that you and all other Wiki Nazis will relax. If you are concerned with useless edits please see the edit fom the 26th. I know it was carried out by the great infallable Mindmatrix but imho that was the first useless change. " +") (ETA: John D. Haynes House. SarekOfVulcan (talk) " +, 16 December 2005 (UTC) Mendel doesn't talk about those changes at all. Mendel was refering to the Conspiracy section that used to be there. 16:53 +Absolutely, use of that word is strongly misleading, even with '-like'. The structure had nothing to do with mastaba - a burial chamber basicly. Mastaba by definition has entran & ceinner space. This structure was one solid pile of rocks, with no inner space or entrances. It was ment as a wall fragment. +Oh, also wouldn't films that are named Three or some variation thereof be listed on the disambig page and not on here? JUST WONDERING BECAUSE IT MAKES MUCH MORE SENSE TO ME (I apologize in advance for certain individuals who are too sensitive to hear the truth) +Review Request Hi, I'd like to request KLM for a GA-class review. Can anyone do that? It seems to have many similar stuff to other GA's, such as Kenya Airways and Ethiopian Airlines. Cheers. '''BreaksFixes''' +" Link to Sacramento I placed a wikipedia-link in this article where the word ""Sacramento"" appears. Another editor, who appears to be stalking me and is reverting everything that I do, claims that I am ""overlinking"" by doing this. I have read the policy, and think I understand it, and I disagree with him. The word ""Sacramento"" was not linked anywhere else in this article before I made the link, and I think that my link provided good context for a reader who did not know Walnut Creek but thought that maybe they knew Sacramento. Was there anything wrong with my link? I would like someone objective to give their opinions. 74.234.45.208 " +Your blatant POV pushing Neither of you guys has made any contribution to this Italian history article other than to shove your unhistorical unconstructive modern POV in my face. This is a HISTORY article. HISTORY. Have you heard of that? This is the reason why so many people get pissed off about the pedantry and idiocy and triviality of Wikipedia. J*sus. Get a f*cking life. +I've abused NOTHING. Your threats are extremely disrespectful to the rules of Wikipedia. All I have ever done is tried to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles and maintain the standards of quality. I should NOT be treated like a vandal who only registered to muck up articles. My account should not be blocked. I should be an administrator. ( ) +Give me a permanat block raseac....!!! remember me....!!! Muslims dont you worry for these images they are trying to hurt us but they cant look these images are fake and have nothing to do with Islam or our prophet even their article is so lame wikipedia is not an authentic source its an encyclopedia for the kids which has not authenticity anyone can edit or write whatever they think...just like raeasc you can see he does not knows what Islam is and he talks about it so forget about wiki its lame they have no authenticity...i recommend they should add pissed christ in jessus article....they should... +I FIND IT DIFFICULT TO CONTROL MY EMOTIONS and I still feel that Mr Logy Wogy was bad. +And check this out: http://www.cla.purdue.edu/blackmon/102cs2001/critical.html#bio +"::: You are wrong. Although I was blocked on some occasions, I was never blocked for Sockpuppetry or Vandalism. It was because of disputes on multiple topics with various socks of user:Hkelkar & user:VandalPetrol, both of which are permabanned. I have never used any other account. If you are permitted to edit then you should get other accounts deleted which says you are indeffed. No-Blast " +i only deleted personal attacks +Well I will use my user page then, don't tell meyour gonna remove it too, because that will piss me off and drive me nuts. Also I am not making a personal ttack on Jimmy wales, I am saying he is a bit to greedy dont you think? He's got 6 million dollars already and now he's asking for more. +I thought I would offer you some advise aswell: 1)No Wikipedia:Edit warring 2)No arguing with Wikipedia:Administrators 3)May I also remind you of the three-revert-rule +Bad Redirect Please remove the redirect from the X-24C page, that aircraft was distinctly different in design, builder, mission, etc, and restore that aircrafts unique content to its page.75.67.80.68 +" It's in the History, or more conveniently in your own contribs. Thank you for the explanation, but that wasn't a big deal. I was more upset by your second post—waving me off with a sneer about growing a thicker skin and a finger-waggle about ""profanity""—treating me as an insensate piece of internet polemic rather than a fellow human attempting to give an honest account of herself. An account which Mackensen promptly removed, as you say. Well, I understand that trying to contribute to the workshop was a bad idea in the first place—running full tilt into Tony Sidaway, after managing to avoid him on IRC for a whole month, to the immeasureable improvement of my quality of life. Anyway. I've always seen you as somebody who stands up for the underdog — I remember praising your addition of this edit to the Harassment guideline—and I was sad to see there was no mutuality of respect. | talk ." +Thanks for that. I'll take a deep breath and have a go at an intro tomorrow. I identified the source of the phrase London over the border, and showed that the boundary is contested in the footnote. I've clarified the diaspora section, and will justify the statements by reference to the Victoria History articles on West Ham and East Ham. Hopefully, I'll struggle to a justification without substantially changing the outcome of the previous discussions. Then move onto to standardising the references, probably section by section. +Yes, I received the confirmation e-mail on 2012-09-11 with username (= my e-mail-address) and password. Uuuh, it was 09/11 ... +this user is such a worthless goddamn faggot fuck you faggot +Btw whatever decision an adminstration wish to take. He should remember that this block is too harsh given that it is his first violation since he joined wikipedia. - +the episode list to keep the episode list above the references. +over the next ~30 hours or so +The total population(10 millions) does not match with the e sum of the referenced populationsbelow in the infoboxImages in Infobox +MATT HARDY IS SO FUCKY!!!''Italic text[[Media:Example.ogg]]'''''MATT HARDY IS SO FUCKY!!! +" I'm always on the ""Requests for page protection"" if I detect any missing/errant templates to see if the administrators can correct them. " +When you say irrigiation structure, what exactly do you mean? I live on an irrigated block which uses overhead sprinkers, and I'm not far from the nearest channel. Thye all look the same throughout Sunraysia. I've got a little spare time now to grab some more shots, though I don't think I'll get out as far as Dareton. Got any requests? \talk +" == I wasnt really attacking him/her regarding the Lisa Williams article (Hmpzzz!) Do you know if Lisa can see dead people too? I have psychic powers too you know, i can see the future! Send all these ""Lisa Williams"" to Finland and they will all be locked in jails for being scam artists!" +" Yes. Quite persistent. I'm about to just create the article myself... Other new users are going to get lost in this discussion! T/C " +North Eastern Region of Jharkhand Wiki says North Eastern Region of Jharkhand is Angika region. However, official language of theses districts of Jharkhand is not Angika but Hindi, Santali. This is confusing. So, it needs some clarification as to how come district of Jharkhand where the official language is Hindi, Santali could be Angika region. Only those districts would be in Angika region where official language is Angika. ```` +Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 14:59, 16 +I'm pretty sure the incident has already been included. And I know how to handle my own at riots, too. 8) +I'm afraid that's a broken link for me. - +" It isn't about success. It's a phenomenon that goes back at least 100 years, to the days of Sousa and Johann Strauss. However, if you look at the ""Article Milestones"" section above, you'll see it has survived no fewer than four deletion discussions. And we do require credible sources, and fancruft is removed on sight. andemu " +hate is my topic is hate if you hate a person means you like that person. Your hate can turn into your love +REDIRECT Talk:The Best of Apocalypse +" Just dropping by, I thought I'd leave a little feedback too. A featured picture is not always put on the main page, as noted by WP:POTD. For example, the semi-nude Michele Merkin was not used as it was found ""too cheesy"". Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Unused notes several pictures that were not used because they depict too much gore or are of a scatological nature. A featured picture rating is essentially indicating that the community feels that the image is of high quality and high encyclopedic value. On a side note, POTD seems to be up to . Thanks for taking up the trace, Pink Oboe. " +" I saw that reference, and I added a note (see note 10) by the name ""republic"". " +and revert his edits +Message- Long time, no talk I was just pottering around on Wiki, and suddenly I thought of you. So anyway, how ya going? I hope we can get along now. Anyway, there is an issue that I have, that has to do with Wikipedia. A user on here had been stalking me and asking some innapprpriate questions. Do you have any ideas of what I could do. I know that user is also from Australia. Could the police here do any thing? Cheers for now! 122.106.27.175 +Be careful who you call a moron. +" Leadbeater Biography SmackBot problem Rich- Regarding the C.W.Leadbeater biography article,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Webster_Leadbeater, on 12 Dec ""Philosophus"" improperly reverted my extensive revision of Dec 9. I removed all the smears and slanders from the article yet he accuses me of having a NPOV problem. No editor has the right to revert the good faith contribution of another editor, I will undo his improper revert. As you made a minor edit or two since then, your edits will probably be lost, also. Please communicate specifically what faults you find in the text and maybe we can work out some compromise wording, if you are knowledgeable in the subject. If you are not knowledgeable you have no business editing this article. " +Looks good to me. I think a nice pic of Midtown from across the East River would be the best possible addition to the montage, but there isn't one currently available on wiki commons. +Except for the fact that there's no information for the table, NO confirmation on number of episodes (why don't you just put 50 in?), so it's just clutter - and NOT vandalism. 220.245.146.235 +I NEVER FUCKING MADE THIS MOTHER FUCKING ARTICLE I JUST FUCKING EDITED IT AND THAT WAS A FUCKING LONG TIME AGO FUCKING ASSHOLES! PISSING ME OFF @ +":Yes, I do hope to get it to GA status in the future. ) WP:MOSTV states that for fictional characters, their storylines should come first, and then the information on their creation and characterization. It makes more sense to read about what storylines the character has been involved in, before going into the production of it all. The same style is used for articles on books, films and television shows/episodes. '''16 " +Hi Im a fucking bitch. 50.180.208.181 +Support Lets protect and save this page from User:Balagonj786. This page has full of errors and invalid references. +Newsletter draft ready Hi Dank, I have prepared an initial draft of our drive wrap-up newsletter at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/April 2012; if you could find the time to check it over before it goes out, that would be super. Thanks. +Oh ok, I just wanted to see what people thought. Anyway its up for CSD. Hey do you like my talk page? I hope you don't mind ) talk ER +Mark II subsec I removed the Mark IIx subsections and made them bulleted lists. There was no reason, in my eyes, to subsec one line of information. // +" Can there be a more concise listing? The listing of ""other inventions"" is profoundly vague. Why group 4 different categories together? Why even mention things that the chinese received purely from outside sources? There should be a much more complete, well managed list of chinese developments, which I've yet to find- along with how these were transmitted globally, and whether or not places like Europe got them purely from the Chinese. This really needs the attention of people with some remote expertise, which I guess is somewhat there when Needham's work, which is profoundly rare in private collections was cited- not like the arrogant bigoted ass who was crying about chinese nationalism, yet then went onto say that they only invented noodles. And besides, why are things like the cannon and porcelain listed under ""other inventions""? Who developed these independently?" +Keep your chin up! Darwinism was not accepted over-night. There appears to be more sense in the AAT origins, than the sort-cut hypothesis that our ancestors went from swinging in trees to the prairies (and then, eons later, take up a sedentary life style so they could edit Wikipedia and face book etc., all day). One only has to watch little kids on the beach. The first time a wave throws them bottom-over-elbow they may well cry – but after a time, they can't wait to get into the water again. It is as if being at home on a sea-edge environment is hard-wired into their genes. Unfortunately, the rise in sea level since these times means that evidence of these coastal communities may never be found. Keep plugging away until the old hypothesis fade away. +The transcluded part of the GA review doesn't seem to update into the main talk page of the article correctly. May have to click to go to the subpage to get the most up-to-date version. Sorry, its looong. You can skim most of the content-related stuff, I guess. +Protecting 'Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus' Hi, Can you explain on its talk page why you protected this article? There is some edit warring going on, but not very heavy (for the standards of this article). Also I am a participant in a mediation case, but that concerns actually only the use of one source on this page, and is irrelevant to the present edit warring. Therefore I was wondering about your motivation. Regards, +I don't care what you say here. I don't believe one sentence anymore. +If you would like to write an article of Bill's father, including his rise to CEO of Commonwealth Edison, feel free. This article is about Bill. We're not writing a chatty, book-lenth biography about him, but stating facts - same as other biographical articles in Wikipedia. The details of his father's career are irrelevant, although his (eventual) stature as CEO is not. This is yet another issue that has already been resolved. +" Vandalism is for e.g. this type of edit, somebody said that The Stig was leaving so I reverted it, basically I reverted it because there was no source to suggest that he was leaving, so I do know what vandalism is I just want to carry on editing Wiki, I love this place it's amazing please don't ""make me leave"", now that I've explained myself please please unblock me ( Thanks —123 " +I can tell you what the argument is about here newseventsguy. It's about YOUR retroactive reversion of a simple edit trying to include secondary independent verification of sedimentary nanodiamonds in Younger Dryas sediments by Bement and Madden et al., WITHOUT DISCUSSION a reference that I notice has NOT YET been included in the reference list still, after all this time. This is after you ADMIT that you are ignorant of the peer review literature and the controversy. Any attempt to do simple reference list edits on this page have been stomped by no less that five admittedly biased and ignorant editors. The honorable thing to do here would be to recuse yourself from editing the page, as I have. But I haven't seen that happening until now. Good luck with it, you've already made complete fools of yourselves. +" December 2015 (UTC) Thanks. I have started working on Pranagnihotra Upanishad but I am unable to get the full text from the Deussen's Sixty Upanishads (pages 646-648 do not appear in the book under Google url}. Can you suggest a url which gives the full text? In the meanwhile I have completed this short article Sharabha Upanishad which you may like to see and add/edit. Nvvchar. 01:52, 3" +" Excellent! That would be great. The comments found at its peer review should also be very helpful, but I haven't had any time to actually act upon those suggestions. Cheers. —Hello! " +where's with pitchforks already? 17:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) +Hi Fracophonie, Thanks for taking the time to write such a long message - I appreciate this. In terms of what I said about the age - I didn't mean to cause offense. I thought I read somewhere that you had to be over 18 to make these decisions but I think I was getting confused with the check user privileges. I have already read some of those policies but will read the rest later today. I am not a troll - I just need time to get used to all these acronyms, policies etc. From what started out with me writing an article about my favourite website has turned into a massive thing which was not what I was expecting. I really don't have any more time to argue and debate with the usrs since its clear they just want it deleted despite what I have said. For example one user just wrote there is another site called Amirite.net. This is Amirite.com!! This is precisely why I had to keep responding on the AFC delete page. In terms of the rest I agree to do them (of course I can only apologise once I am unblocked) - can you apologise for me? On a side note I am actually French and Jewish (shame about the gay part though:) +" It is unnecessairy source, because it does not matter how many soldiers were killed. What matters is that the Safavids were deposed. Besides that, mentioning that information WITHOUT making any remarks about the brutality of the Afghan forces - for example the complete massacre of the Safavid family (including women and children), as well as the massacres on the civilian population in Isfahan, Bam, and villages of Khorasan - is considered POV. Besides that, you have not shown any sources for your claim that ""30000-100000 soldiers were killed"". And as for the edits: it does not matter what YOU believe, it only matters what the Wikipedia rules are. You posted a message without editting ANYTHING ... that's the same as abusing the article's history as a message-board. Use the REAL message-board instead. " +" Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! talk " +recaptcha 1 it isn't defamatory 2 it relates to a computer system not a living person ReCAPTCHA forces users to solve the Captcha to access whatever the service in question is. Forced labor is the definition slave labor, i am going to revert your reversion, please do not do it again or i will report you for vandalism also please don't send me threatening messages tia 94.168.204.89 +REDIRECT Talk:José Manuel Rojas +If you feel that I am acting in manor inconsistent with my responsibilities you can post something at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you want to make changes to University of Wisconsin–Madison and you have reliable source references to support those changes then post the references with the changes. This Tutorial may help with references. If you have more questions just ask. +All the sources needed are provided, all you need to do is read the article...but I guess you can't read. Once again you prove you are not even reading the article. Every edit is backed up with the source it came from. I am NOT going to provide you with any details, because you are merely a civillain editor and not a Wikipedia staff member. You have all the info you need within the PIRA text edits. If a actual Wikipedia staff member wants more specifics I will be happy to provide them Look, you are obviously a Anti-IRA hack who is making things up to support your bias. I am neither pro not anti IRA. I have no bias, I merely report facts. I will be checking this page daily, and will continue to submit my PIRA entry because it is by far the most accurate and factually supported. We can do this several times a day if you wish, or you can accept the fact that mine is the superior version and just deal with it. It's up to you, but I will re-edit on a regular basis. Or we can agree to incorporate your fatcxs and mine into one article. But the three areas. The number of Loyalists killed from 1974 to 1998 The number of IRA victims as broken down by both Janes Intelligence online and the CFR. and the IRA/RussianMafia connection which has been documented in multiple books and newspaper sources. These three things are verifiable and will remain. +It's from one of the many books on various bands... I thought it was from Cult Rockers, but I just checked and Supertramp isn't in there. I will seek out a source for this quote. - +When an article is created about that album then a disambiguation page will be created. +Blocking Mardyks Guess what? Loser! Know what a cockblocker is? Hahahaha ~M~ 71.39.183.86 +Wikipedia administrators are defending a mass-murdering psychopath. +request for help = request for help Hi again Cat, as perviously I have noticed a strong anti-Greek bias on several articles related to Macedonia. I've had issues with both Furper and Beam... who seem to be admins that heavily favour FYROM. I've officially complained on the notice board about their threats to block, edit behavior and unusually close relationships with obvious FYROM POV members of Wikipedia. (specifically Balkanfever) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#This_anon_.28apparently_User:Crossthets.29.2C_is_an_apparent_POV_Pusher.2C_evidence_below As I said verbatim on Politis talk_page... This is a difficult battle because so far I am alone at the moment, I am a newbie, and as I said to one of the admins on notice board... I feel like someone reporting a bad cop at a policeman's ball. However, I still plan to follow up soon with a precise listing of what I perceive as non-NPOV behavior by these admins. I noticed while researching this issue you've also have problems with them. Would it be possible to list any problems on your talk page here so I can add them to my report to show I am not alone? Furthermore... since you have been around longer you probably know more Greeks than me around here. Would it be possible to also contact them to ask them if they've also had problems with those two... and (if so) add those incidents to your list? (and perhaps get them to contact others?) Where one person could be bullied with threats of blocking... the concerns of many will be taken much more seriously. I will check back here in a couple of days. Have courage. Regards 209.161.238.86 +" Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheongye Kwan Your post at the above AFD on a new martial art bothers me. This was the version at the time, that you based your post on. You posted: ""I just read the article, and to be quite honest, feel that it does satisfy Wikipedia's guidelines... it is reliably sourced... Since I believe the notability of the article is satisfied... It now has 11 independent sources. And to refute the argument posed by Wayne, it is determined by the Phillip Rhee source that the martial arts is not localised"". Please consider the concerns this post raises. Simple matters like references, notability and noobie basics of AFDs should be routine for any moderately experienced user, and bread-and-butter for any admin. In fact a cursory check shows that almost everything you stated was.. I don't have a word for it. ""Unreal"" is close. The ""eleven independent sources"" that you stated established notability and non-localization at the time, were: Three references from 2004 [coates, robinson, shaw], certainly before the topic even existed (!) and all related to a passing piece of news about its founder being on the team of a completely different sport in any event (!) Two references from 1st half 2005 [davies, white], almost certainly identical and identically irrelevant to the topic's notability. The promoter's personal page on his local town website, almost certainly self-published [official village website]. A 2008 casual interview in a non-notable and possibly non-reliable university magazine (apparently) of the promoter's travels to see experts in a different sport, with tangential tiny (< 1 sentence) mention that he'd discussed his new sport with them too. [ the Lau Philip ""LA"" interview]. 3 entries marked ""Reference and support of , Written Reference"" [chris, cook, rhee], obviously a request by the founder to a friend/colleague write a letter of support, that was never published anyway and isn't cited so you can't have read it (not that it was even possibly valid evidence). A short writeup of a ""local information"" kind, on the award of the first 4 black belts by the school, in its local paper. In brief of the 11: 5 were before the sport existed and were not even remotely to do with the topic itself much less ""sourced"" material on it or ""substantial"" coverage (they had precisely zero coverage); 3 were claims of personal ""I think is a great guy"" letters of support, evidently solicited and/or written on request, with zero evidence of verifiable existence, and certainly in no way reliably sourced or independent; 1 was self-written 1 was the briefest of non-mentions in a non-reliable source (pretty much ""I discussed the topic with them"" in a college magazine interview) 1 is local press coverage of his courses that's not even ""news for a day"" or evidence of anything beyond ""a course by this name is taught twice weekly in our local village hall"". Your assessment of these, at AFD, was: It is reliably sourced {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" | There is barely one reliable source in all of those 11 that the sport even exists in the first place (!) - a local newspaper mention that it meets in a village hall on tuesdays and fridays and just awarded its first 4 black belts. Probably via self-promotional input. There is zero reliable sourcing for any of the rest. |} That the cited pages are evidence of notability {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" | They don't mention it, or even date from a time the topic existed, nor are online versions provided! How on earth could they ""reliably evidence"" it? |} That the ""11 sources"" are ""independent"" {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" | 3 are claims that ""please support me"" letters exist; they are even stated to be ""personal references""; unpublished and uncited 1 is his own clearly self-written web page on a local village web host |} That the cites show it is ""non-localized"" {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" | The page doesn't list a link so you can't have checked the cite, yet you say the citation ""proves"" it. The reference openly stated ""Cambridge University and Bristol Taekwando"" (!) a big indication of its actual source When a link was provided on request it turns out it' +I believe that I have obeyed the communities rules. I do understand the rules about personal attacks. But it appeares to me that they are being applied unjustly in this instance. I have provided countless hours of academic research and input for Wikipedia. Please assume good faith on the part of the blocking admin! I am an intelligent adult. I naturally assume good faith until other parties demonstrate they don't. It seems to me this is a one-side affair. +" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) " +A few things to get straight... Firstly, I do not like you. You look like a smug little prick to me. Secondly, I do not like your ethnicity. Not one little bit. I'd like you to explain yourself on that count. Thirdly, your dog is a bit of a bender. 94.1.96.85 +" Please do not accuse members of vandalism. I do not mind if you change the word unique to prominent or remove stories of dreams etc. but you have vandalised the page and made a statement biased by saying that Dr. Qadri ""only"" sent out a referendum so I reverted the whole edit. You have also reciently vandalised the page by removing the names of the Yemeni scholars who recieved Dr. Qadri's Ijaza including the pictures and this is a clear form of vandalism so before accusing other members of vandalism do not vandalise the page yourself. What I did was clearly not vandalism as I only reverted your edit and any changes you made and brought the page back to its previous form. So would you first kindly read the rules of wikipedia and find out the definition of vandalism before accusing experienced users. You are still new to wikipedia I'm afraid and you need to learn how it works and the different rules of wikipedia before making any further edits. " +Simpsons movie poster Did you create the Simpsons movie poster image or did you source it from somewhere else? +I did not intend to be disruptive, I was genuineley upset by the word constantly. I only tried to make it look like an april fool joke after you explanation made me look like an uptight weirdo +Shamash is Sun I agree to merge Sammash in to Shamash, since Shamash is more likely to be correct. Tracking the root of the word, clearly it is of Assyrian origin, in addition, it is a common vocabulary morph to substitute “Sh” to “S” and thus, nowadays, it is spelled as Shams in Modern Arabic. +Hello Setanta, can I ask you what you think of the proposal first put forward by Matt Lewis in July at Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland. I confess I am no expert on N.Ireland, but I believe this could solve the problem of N.Ireland having no flag to represent it on wiki. I have made a comment at that article. Cheers. +The real problem is the sneering and contemptuous attitude that you reveal in your first sentence in the last post. (It was originally followed by others in similar vein, which you have deleted.) Yes. I can cut and paste quotations. I can also select appropriate ones, in this case one which you would do well to consider. I will return to this when I have time, probably this weekend. +" He does appear to be a bit of a fantasist. To be fair, he has carved a nice little career for himself and more fool the mugs that buy his books and believe what he says. But, like many people contributing to this page, I come from that background and whenever his name is mentioned the response is always ""Dave who?"" No-one had ever heard of him at all until the books started coming out. " +dar Ok, bear with me. Penelopism is a religion. It's a new religion. But it is a religion. Penelopism is extrememly important to Penelopists. We want the word about us out there. People are not too fond of our beliefs. We just want a way to show them that we mean no harm. Now, you have the Spaghetti Monster Church in here. That is not even a real religion. Penelopism is. So please. Tell me what the Spaghetti Monster has done that Penelopism hasn't. What can we do so that Penelopism can be on wikipedia? Because I am having trouble understanding. And I apologize for the 'dar dar dar.' However much fun it was, I shouldn't have done it. whatsit. +I intended this to go the page: +by those pushing an anti-MRM POV. +Tried to be productive (look at my contributions) but hit my head against a wall of spoiled greek children (or probably under pay from Greek Government) that purposely keep vandalizing the Albania related pages and keep iritating the albanian editors until they explode and get banned. As a historian I blush with what I find quoted as reliable information on the wikipedia pages and the quality of the editors and sources. Time to move to the French pages (a lot of readers there), still 5 more languages to go. Till next time.Wikipedia sucks! . +Thanks for fixing this. +. I vote for Christ Pantocrator, though it could be nice with a wider crop +for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. +" Gift cards for downloads Re: ""As of December 28, 2007 it is not possible to use gift cards to purchase MP3s even though the gift card FAQ claims ""Yes, Amazon.com gift cards can be used to buy Amazon MP3 and Unbox downloads"" "" - strictly speaking, this is a false statement as were able to pay for orders with a gift card at that time. One person already removed that line but it was reverted. Is there a good way to go about providing verification? " +" My experiences came up on the talk page but once I understood Wikipedia I didn't post anything on the article related to my personal experiences. That was like the 2nd day almost two months ago. All of my references are verifiable.There's nothing in the article about my law suit or my being put in jail for engaging in pro se litigation. I didn't put my experiences in the Judge Edward Nottingham article either although he was my judge. I went out of my way to search for references expressing all the various sides of the issue. For instance, I wrote to the ABA and asked for their input, and in fact, asked them to work on the article. I also posted about issues involved with mediation and settlement with pro ses, citing references from a lawyers point of view. Those references were deleted by someone, I can't remember who and don't know why. At this point, the only reference that I posted that is soft at all is a blog quoting a transcript quoting a former federal judge and I know for sure that is a valid transcript. The guy who runs the blog is a 3rd year law student and has a business selling data services exclusively to lawyers. Even the stuff that was deleted about pro se frustration I had references for. I read in the Wikipedia discussion of sources that blogs can be used in some contexts. I don't believe that I did any original research. All I did is search the Internet for references for the article. I really didn't know about unbundled attorney services or the amount of pro se litigation before I started working on this article. I had already been thinking about forms based filing but I started thinking about that anyway because of my experiences with ECF, which date back to 2004. Also, when I was younger I worked as a systems analyst. I did get the info on the Laws and Liberties of MA years ago, but Wikipedia already had an article on that and it probably would have come up anyway. Same as the U.N. covenantcan't really hide that. I didn't add a and b together to prove a point, at least not consciously. Like today, I was reviewing appellate procedures and it seemed that the 5th Circuit had a more pro se friendly tone, which I think is because of Judge Learned Hand, who was in the fifth circuit. And the only reason I know about that is that one time I went in every federal circuit and searched on the words ""pro se"" in the 40s because I was trying to see if there was a history of putting pro ses in jail for being pro se (No, there was not). What I found in the 40s was that some circuits denied all the pro se appeals without even saying why but Judge Learned Hand seemed pro se friendly. I believe that your posting things about pro se litigants getting an unfair advantage is ""soap boxing"". I do understand your wanting to win thru competition though and about law as a business. I've been an entrepreneur. I didn't know about the Federal Judicial Center until I started working on this article. That book on appellate procedure I found looking for references for this article. The manual on complex litigation I found looking for references for this article. Arguing with you helps me to clarify the issues for myself. One thing I started thinking about a lot in the past few weeks is slavery and how that affected the history of pro se litigation. I ordered the book Slave Nation at the library but I haven't got it yet. But now when I look at pro se law in the different states I think free state, slave state, border state. Also, there were issues related to Indians in some of the western states. The labor union movement had a lot to do with it too, I think. So did the history of workmen's comp, which is of course related to unions. " +Referring to her as *Catherine* I was told in no uncertain terms that I could NOT refer to anyone, living or dead, by their 1st names on WP, & if a female had a title, she had to be referred to as that throughout her article - ie, *Lady Amy* or *Lady Dudley* for Amy Robsart, even though *Lady Amy* was wrong before she was married as she was the daughter of a knight & had no title, & wrong after Northumberland was attainted & all his children lost their styles as offspring of an earl & a duke, & she did not become *Lady Dudley* until Elizabeth I knighted Robert Dudley near the end of Amy's life nor was she then *Lady Amy Dudley* as legally she was no longer the wife of the son of an earl & duke. I thought it was simpler to refer to her as just *Amy* throughout rather than explain the changes that occurred with her name & styles, but was told it was against WP *rules* (though I wasn't pointed to a link for it). Noblewomen are usually called by their 1st names round here as far as I can see, even when they have surnames & are not *of* something! Mary Boleyn is called *Mary*, not *Lady Carey* or *Lady Stafford*, Catherine Neville is called *Catherine* & not *the Duchess of Norfolk*, etc, & they're not royals. As for males, I was told they had to be referred to by their title - ie, *Leicester* - or last name - ie, *Dudley*. I was banging head on keyboard going, but - no one just says *the king* all the time or refers to them as *Plantagenet* or keeps changing their titles - ie, Henry of Bolingbroke going from Earl of Derby to Duke of Hereford to Duke of Lancaster to King of England - So how does Kate get to be consistently referred to as *Catherine* throughout the article, without her title appended? I've only been here a few months & I would appreciate it if someone could actually explain this to me, as my main interest is British history & I am quite confused. +. Mevins31 says: I will be changing your elegant profile shot of Bruce to a better picture as soon as I upload it. I appreciate ordinary Jay Bruce fans, but I am Jay's biggest fan. Thanks for your attention. I think Jay would agree that a picture on Wikipedia has little to do with furthering his career, but nice try +Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. Please do not make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. +History KalliKids was created by Karen Bach in March 2012. +Just shut up and stay shut. Don't edit anymore +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. '''''''''' (talk/contrb.) +Im flattered, I truly am, I've been here a couple of weeks and you consider me to be an established user. Please don't talk about me behind my back like little school children. +I think it depends on the circumstances, if someone won a gold medal at a competition the Gibraltar anthem would be appropriate, rather than 'God save the Queen' +" I TAKE OFFENSE! I take great offense that some pompous, sanctimonious twit thinks that no one should be allowed to express appreciation for women like the Gibson Girl as the ""fine-featured"" and ""achingly beautiful"" creatures that they are. I don't know what kind of totalitarian feminazi dystopian agenda you are trying to foist on people, but don't do it here! This encyclopedia is based on free speech and a free exchange of information, not bogus political correctness and schoolmarmish thought-policing. I'll take a Gibson Girl over you anyday!" +The are problems with the sfc t record. There are no credible sci challenges to it. This new section is absurdly US-centered, it cannot possibly stand as it it. This is the *global* record we're talking about. You need some credible scientific papers, not pictures of stations. As far as I know, the sfcstations stuff has merely documented problems with some station sitings and maintenance, etc. There is not even the beginning of an attempt at quantifying what influence, plus or minus, this might have on the record. If you're interested, there are papers about the effects of switching from north-wall screens to stevenson screens; thatched huts in africa; etc etc +If we do win, and get these evil people out of the government (and their private forces as well), then perhaps there won't be any nuclear blasts across the US and Europe. btw, if MONGO is really with HS, why is he on wikipedia? +That is true with the first edit, however the second one was an honest mistake. +They seem to be reliable enough for this topic anyways - it's not like many major news sources are going to be covering the things that these sites cover. 63.164.47.227 +" In response to your feedback Yoa can not do it by yourself, see Wikipedia:Changing username.  " +Davkal, I agree with you, but would suggest that you don't discuss it or gloat because you know he will likely come back and start harassing agagin. Apparently just a few hours after he left someone bit his head off on his talk page about a comment he left in an article. - +" Thanks Thanks for the tip Buddy. walkie-talkie KY highway page I'm currently cleaning up the page. Please do not edit it. Thanks. Let's Go Mets - Stats Your first barnstar! {| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"" |rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" | |rowspan=""2"" | |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |- |style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" | I hereby award BigrTex the tireless contributor barnstar due to his outstanding amount of high quality edits. Hikaru " +Messages on talk pages during an AfD Placing messages on Users talk pages such as and in the hope of gaining support is an unacceptable practice which, agin, hinders the AfD process. +Thanks User talk:Biggity... are there any constructive edits? Indef block, perhaps? Mahalo. +MILLINOS OF HUNJAN looking at hunjan template not just me other hunjan will fight back, your concept of art bull of shit!! 86.166.250.11 tharkarn and what waste man! +Some day, you and I are going to remember this and laugh!!! HA HA HA HA HA!!!! Never forget: I have incredible power. I am more powerful than you can possibly imagine. Let me just close(?) this conversation by bidding you a fond farewell. ♥ +" Bloc voting Countries with large populations of non-nationals may have their televote influenced considerably. This has been cited as the reason for apparent bloc voting in the Balkan countries of the former Yugoslavia.[91] This is full-blown crazy. What does ""non-nationals"" mean? These countries have similar cultures and speak the same languages. The stars in Croatia are popular in Serbia and vice versa. People are nationals of their countries in the largest proportion in each of those countries (there are some refugees in each of those countries, but that doesn't really explain why Croatia would always give the highest no. .of pts to Serbia, or Macedonia to Serbia, where there was no conflict to speak of). For example, I'm a Bosnian Serb and me voting for a Croatian or a Serbian song is not unusual. But I'm not a Bosnian non-national. I have the passport of BiH, and my family has never lived in Serbia in history. It's really about mutual intelligibility which is why Scandinavian bloc votes for each other all the time. It's the language and sensibility." +Email Thanks for your email about the message you received from Guyovski. I received a similar, though not openly threatening, email from Guyovski as well. +I've removed it. It contributes NOTHING to the article. +"you are totally wrong the synonyms or terms of ""Kshatriya"" and ""Andhra Kshatriya"" was and is used for only ""Rajus"" but not other castes of Andhra Pradesh acording to Anthropological Survey of India by Kumar Suresh Singh which can be seen above and also in his other books.Because ""Rajus"" are kshatriyas and also called as ""Rachavaru"" in telugu in Medeival Period.Thats why Krishna Rao used the word ""Rachavaru"" and also he is not an ordinary man,B.V.Krishna Rao belongs to Andhra Historical Research society.According to Kumar Suresh Singh they are Kshatriyas who migrated from north india but not locals which is also supported by other anthropologers as the truth is Aryans initially entered into Indian Sub-continent and stayed in north india & north-east and then their castes i.e. Brahmins,Kshatriyas & Vaishyas gradully migrated and settled to south india. No," +" That did not help. I don’t have an inkling what you are attempting to communicate to me. This is how the word is pronounced: inǧilizíyya. Or you can use IPA. Your new system with letters like ɩȋɑë is illegible to me. I don’t know what you mean by ""first edition"" or by ""ALFB"". I don’t know what you mean by ""long í is out of the ending"" or anything else that you said. Probably you can understand me much better than I you, so let us simply say that the word is inǧilizíyya. " +You have left me no choice. Wikipedia is a group of fellow editors. You will be banned according to your actions, not your status. +" Orphaned non-free image (Image:KSV Hessen Kassel.png) Thanks for uploading Image:KSV Hessen Kassel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Orphaned non-free image (Image:Darmstadt98.png) Thanks for uploading Image:Darmstadt98.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Orphaned non-free image (Image:Eintrachtbraunschweig.png) Thanks for uploading Image:Eintrachtbraunschweig.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Orphaned non-free image (Image:Karlsruher SC.png) Thanks for uploading Image:Karlsruher SC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You m +Very Nice Work with Aristotle Onassis Nice to meet you. Very nice work with Onassis. Thanks too much. +REDIRECT Talk:Carlos Johnson (musician) +This is super trivial, more a clarification. I chopped out the explicit mention of the BBC and dequoted, since it would be clear from the reference, in order to perform a minor space-saver. Either way, the 'weasel words' are still present, only now quoted and the source cited in the text. Is that standard in Wikipedia, as your edit comment suggested, when weasels 'cannot' be avoided? Best etc. ~ +"|1=129.234.157.91|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by """". The reason given for Tango's block is: ""Personal attacks or harassment"".|3=Coren|4=1310028" +Whoever put a notices on my page. I will kill u +" ""circular"" as well as the counter arguments. Defending S-C is risen to the level of religion. It's not only circular, it's vertigo. 78.0.128.72 " +" Thanks ) • You Da One " +Latin America also includes Brazil, that had an diferent social system then that of Hispanic America.The title of this section is wrong. +William L. Walsh Hello Lemurbaby. There has been no recent improvements to the William L. Walsh article for GA status. Possibly this article needs to be withdrawn from the Good Article nominations page, unless, recommendations have been addressed. +This is futile as I mentioned. There are multiple sources confirming Ali's apostasy from Islam. Can you demonstrate that Warraq is not trustworthy? (talk•contribs) +" Issues Onefortyone, the reason why I removed your edits, because they have following problems:- It is Graceland that is 2nd most visited place in the USA., , , Not Biltmore Estate. ""The décor throughout the house has often been criticized"" is incorrect, it has not been criticized by anyone. Then you put up the quotes of Albert Goldman, a fringe theorist on Elvis Presley, and added them under Graceland#Basement, which is irrelevant. Those ""conflicting reports"" about his death have no relevance on this article, especially when they are disputed or rejected enough times. This is why this kind of content misleads and should be removed. I don't see any consensus for adding it on archives or previous discussion either. " +Cavorting with Heretics Fuck Heretics!!! +People, we are desperately in need of some consensus here. Can we all please vote for one of the following options. Given that there are three options, I think a 51% plurality would suffice. Some of the options have subordinate polls: please vote again in each of these subpolls +}} {{WikiProject New Zealand |class=C |importance=low |politics=yes |politics-importance=low +Back atcha And thanks to you too! Cheers, (talk) +" Yup. I wonder as well. I also hope that soon the coroner's report is released, and ""all hell breaks loose,"" so we can all finally get to work on fixing this thing with some reliable information. Just me. Your mileage may vary. " +Foto Foto states: Carpatho-Rusyn sub-groups - Transcarpathian Rusyns in original goral folk-costumes from Maramureş. Photo: Village Mokre near Sanok (Poland). 2007. But why do they wear trousers sharovary of Ukranian Cossack?? +The multitude of sources simply cannot be ignored. There are several articles stating the environmental impact. I will actually expand the section in the article because the monument is so big, people should know as a part of an encyclopedia the river bed violations. I would disagree with the arguments given above and that the edit should have more expansion within the article as a half dozen citations stating there are environmental issues. Also there is a persistent conflict of interest from the users above but from their follow-ups, there intentions will be clear. +What do you mean? I think we should stick to what sources say. Have more sources been uncovered which portray the subject as anything other than a criminal? Or have the rules changed so that BLPs should no longer reflect what sources say? +" Context of ""In the beginning""? The article starts in media res. What was ""the Truman Committee"". At the very least a link? " +" He has voluntarily accepted a 5-month self-imposed ban on editing political topics, and has been unblocked. I'm okay with that, and have told him so. | Talk " +" Sorry, I consulted you before I did anything else. Then I noticed you'd posted to the second debate, so I left a note there. No, I'm afraid the closing reason is not beside the point. I am going to reverse you, but do feel free to re-close it as a ""no consensus"" if you wish. Closing on a technicality, when some people are arguing for deletion is simply going to frustrate people and lead to a needless second debate on DRV and AfD. You do not close a debate on the ground of the nominators wishes, unless no one else is suggesting delete. " +" Why ""Commonwealth"" instead of ""Dominion?"" Based upon comparing the governments of the Dominion of Canada and the Commonwealth of Australia, I don't really understand the differences. The idea of a Commonwealth seems to compare directly with that of a Republic, so if the Queen of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the Queen of Australia, how can one style Australia a Commonwealth? Would it not be a Dominion as is the case for Canada? And would not the States of Australia likewise be provinces? I honestly don't understand the differences between each of these and if someone could explain them to me, it would be greatly appreciated. 2 July 2005 03:19 (UTC)" +05 / 8: – 08:17, 12 August +" Hello Hi Blu Aardvark, glad to see you did not permanently leave Wikipedia. I was wondering why my Template:Current event template redirect wasn't working, couldn't see the obvious! ) — (talk) 2006-01-15 13:36Z Thanks Thanks for taking note of The Arcata Eye and Plazoid pages. Happy Birthday! Have a great day ) (talk) Admin Fighter That was really funny, gave me a good chuckle. You should have just crossed it out and left it in. (Talk) ""Removing religious and political categories. Recent attempt at vote stacking leaves a bad taste in my mouth."" Were you referring to this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Catholic Alliance of Wikipedia-like vote stacking? (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) No. I was referring to a Wikipedia email I recieved earlier today, sent by now. policy proposal Hi, you recently commented on bible-verse articles, and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly 50 specific verses: Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of 1 Kings 4 and 5 Ubuntu Logo Blu, I noticed you changed the logo for the Ubuntu Linux User Box. Why? The usage policy on Ubuntu's offical site clearly allows for such use. Besides, the logo is just that, a low-resolution image of a logo, which is allowed under fair use. I am aware that some discussion has been going around about ""fair use"" images in user boxes. If you changed the logo to Tux because I labeled it as a fair use image and not with some other licensing information, I'm sure I can find an appropriate image copyright tag. At the time I had changed it, several ongoing discussions had indicated that copyrighted images and logos available under fair use were not to be used in userspace, per Wikipedia policy. The Ubuntu trademark policy may allow it, but Wikipedia policy (per WP:FU is to limit images that are not available for commercial use - which the Ubuntu trademark policy explicity disallows. | (talk) | (contribs) The preceding text was copied from User talk:Jcarroll WP:NPA Please review and adhere to WP:NPA, WP:CIV, and WP:WQT. Please re(?)-familliarize yourself with Wikipedia policy. Thanks in advance. I am fully aware of the above policies, thank you. I do not feel that it can be considered a personal attack, or incivil, to call a troll a troll. I'm sorry if you don't agree with me in that - but that does not mean that my statement is a violation of any of the above policies. | (talk) | (contribs) It is a violation, and you must refrain from it. WP:NPA is non-negotiable. Funny. Nobody considers it a violation of WP:NPA to call User:Willy on Wheels a vandal. Nobody con +Bleh. I'm all out of ideas. Is there really something wrong with the server or what? The damn thing won't work for me, either Helvetica_font_new.svg (my upload of Segoe UI was actually a PNG to begin with...) +does fall under wikipedias NOR policy +Homosexual marriage is totally gay Well it is! 12.204.164.179 +banging your head against a wall Hi, I see JayJG has been leaving messages on your page, with his false concern about the rules and supposed reasonableness. In reality, JayJG is a rabid Zionist and is trying to purge Wikipedia of any negative information about Zionism, and is trying to paint Muslims in a bad light. Along with many of his cohorts. The problem is that JayJG is part of the Wikipedia cabal. When there were elections, despite massive efforts to the contrary, a number of people got a higher vote percentage than JayJG - but Jimbo Wales put him on ArbCom anyhow. Jimbo has shown his true colors as well. These people control Wikipedia. They are all together, and attacking you. No one is coming to your aid. This is because they control Wikipedia, with Jimbo at the center, and have more or less driven off everyone else. You are banging your head against a wall here - any massacre by Zionists against Palestinians will be covered up, disorted, justified etc., anyone who attacks an Israeli soldier will be castigated here. My suggestion is to direct your efforts to somewhere more creative, like a wiki encyclopedia that is not pro-Zionist and anti-Muslim like this one. Or if you do continue here for a little bit, to spend less time. It is better to waste 5 hours of time accomplishing nothing than 10. Eventually you will give up here, everyone does. You are fighting a losing battle. +She has said that Madonna is a major influence. +Is it still a stub? +Overrated Derek Jeter is overrated, i don't like him at all, he shouldn't be making 20 mill a year for having average seasons +Er...he's me! Please feel free to check out my user page +Fuck you both, I'm not interested in what either of you think. , +This game is teh awesome +SHUT UP, YOU FAT POOP, OR I WILL KICK YOUR ASS!!! +" What ""links/content"" on what page? " +" How did you decide that bukkake always implies a female subject? Also, just because a word has a historical meaning doesn't mean that it can't ever mean anything else as culture develops. The word rap meant ""to knock, as on a door"" up until the late 70s for example. Would you deny the more modern use of the term? The English language has no board to regulate it, as French does with the L'Académie française, so you have no basis for defining what the word means. We have groups and documents that define the proper use of words like ""you're"" and ""your"", for example, but none such for words like bukkake. If it can be shown that it is used in a particular way, that is valid. My personal belief is that there is no need for the qualifier ""gay"", just as there is no need to call men having anal sex ""gay anal sex"", but that's really irrelevent. I think it is important to make clear the historical implications, but not to deny that we are currently creating and modifying language. Even the fact that we have taken the word bukkake, ""splash"", from Japan and created this very specific connotation of splashing not just anything, but specifically semen and specifically onto a person's face shows that this term is elastic and subject not to rules that we impose on it, but by the meaning that it has to the people who use it. " +I hope others are around ( +"==Recent Vandalism== Look at the page history for the guy that keeps writing ""!!!!!!!!!!LINKIN PARK RULZ!!!!!!!!!!"" He's changed the first section to that repeatedly, no matter how many times we reverted it. " +The only vandals are pathetic wiki administrators as encyclopediadramatica.com says right! +Regarding edits made during December 2 2007 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Bendigo South East Secondary College page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. +So far, I have these sources that I will use for William Kaye Estes's and his contribution to education. Bush, R. R., & Estes, W. K. (1959). Studies in mathematical learning theory (Vol. 3). Stanford University Press. dainaloo +" No! This is a GROUP EFFORT! Wikipedia is a collaborative COMMUNITY and there are no school essays here. The article needs to be more professional and adopt a better title besides the references. This is all that needs to be done, so get off your high horse and accomplish what you want to see done. If you have these goals, then put yourself to the test of solving this problem. That's what I do whenever something perturbs me. You're just looking for a fight about something you admittedly care nothing about. How about I come by your house and criticise your gardens? ""Why?"" You say. ""Because they are too fucking ugly and I don't like the way they don't blend in with the neighbours' yards. So tacky, but I'm only passing by and I've never been down this road before."" 15:24, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)" +KISS MY DICK ...ALL 3 OF YOU +" RopeMarks bondage picture Your recent move from Bondage (BDSM) to Bondage (sexual) has caused the image link to the picture of a female bondage model I took at BoundCon 2008 to break. The reason is that, because of frequent vandalism, this image was added to MediaWiki:Bad image list, where it was set that it can only be shown at Bondage (BDSM), Rope bondage and BoundCon. Your recent move requires a change to this list, but I'm not sure how to go about to request such a change. | Talk " +" Upcoming album, Screaming Bloody Murder This seems legit. The catalog number seems real. See , found after I did a Google search using the catalog number from the Allmusic listing of the album. meh " +Too many parentheses. It sounds to personal with all those parentheses. Can someone please clean that up? +" The source clearly says or criticise it in any way. So where is the misunderstanding, I think it cannot be read in more then one way? According to the quote, general criticism of Soviet Union will become illegal. And I must say that I find this to be a truly sad day for Russia, when that happens. " +. If one did leave out carbon atoms then that would not be correct. Example, what would methamphetamine be if you left out a carbon atom? What are left out are hydrogen atoms and they should be, since it has been previously pointed out, they would unduly clutter the diagram and are unnescesary as being implyed anyway +what businessis your one someone elses page. i do recall you and fconway have done this before , so once again it is ok for you to do but no one else., also will you refrain from being a vandal on the martin anderson page. thank you. anynmous +OK I got you the first time. +I'm fed up with all this and the people here. The community here is dying and now I will now indefinitely and probably forever take my place amongst those who have also withdrawn from this project on similar principles, it is nothing but needless stress and over-consumption of time +":The term ""Soviet Empire"" is an informal term of criticism. It is not a precise term, it is not meant to refer to a specific period in Soviet history with a clear beginning and end. It refers to Soviet actions during the Cold War in general. " +28, 4 July 2013 (UTC) +MDY dates in CentOS article Hello there! I've just the date formatting edits, re-establishing MDY dates in CentOS article so, please allow me to explain it a bit further. Manual of Style does say that existing date formats should be kept as-is, but before I came to edit that article, ISO dates prevailed and I've changed them to DMY dates. Thus, I see no problems about moving this time to MDY dates, which, FWIW, I find to be much more readable. Of course, I'm more than open to discussing this further. —  (talk | contribs) +" Please look at the original in page 197 of this link in case my copying made stupid jokes. Let's talk " +There is no evidence that this block has anything to do with sock accounts. My use of my accounts was completely legitimate. And contrary to what Rodhullandemu is trying to imply, the only accounts that I used in the police talk page are mr3003nights and this one (which is a completely legitimate practice). I was blocked for a discussion in the talk page of the article on the policenot for editing the actual article. Please read that discussion I linked to and see it for yourself that it was pure unjustified retaliation for offering evidence Rodhullandemu could not answer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Police#Why_reiterate_.22reduce_civil_disorder.22_instead_of_protection_of_property.3F 69.228.251.134 +You should certainly contact your local police and file a report. Make sure to show documentation demonstration the lack of response from the WMF. Their lack of response may be criminally negligent in some jurisdictions. 134.241.58.253 +" It doesn't matter if they call them ""English"" in the scources you provided, the British are commonly called ""English"" but the term is incorrect because after 1707 it was the Kingdom of Great Britain. If this were a WWI article and you replaced German with Prussian that would be about the same thing you are doing now. Not all scources are correct and it is unencyclopedic to call the British ""English"" as there are also Scots, Welsh, Cornish, and Irish people in Great Britian and calling them all ""English"" is not correct and ""English"" needs to be changed to British. If hope a British user backs me up on this because what I am saying is 100% right and the vandalism warning I gave you is justified so please do not call it a personal attack as it is not. If I called you an insulting name or gave you a useless warning then it would be a ""Personal attack"", but since it is not I would appreciate you would stop vandalising the page by replacing the correct term of British with the incorrect term ""English"". User:Daniel Chiswick 13:00, 7 May 2007" +}} T/C If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +Demonte Morton U bastard stop deletin' my shit u white trash cracker muthafucker. Fuck u u racist bitch. I hope u die. +Bla bla bla....suck it Irishguy =) +Ahh, I am glad to say that I have worked out the problem, and have now added three images (, & ) to commons, and their articles on wikipedia. Thanks again for the assistance Nick. +Esports categories Can I ask why you moved Category:Electronic sports games to Category:Esports games. The general conventions listed on WP:CATNAME say to avoid abbreviations and that topic categories names should correspond to their articles, in this case Electronic sports. +AND ON TOP OF THAT eh, you're not worth it. +" What the hell do u mean cough* *cough* excuse me, who the hell are you accusing of ""disruptive editing"". I was the individual who actually wrote the bulk of the article on Rajbeer Singh. You gave YOU the right to come and simply delete my all my writing??? If you wish to contribute links, go ahead. But who the hell gave you the permission to simply delete all the writing that I had spent time and effort doing? Carry on deleting my work and I will carry on undoing yours.....With pleasure........" +The first THREE were rejected out of hand and the following half a dozen where similarly ditched. I could produce ANOTHER fukkin half a dozen but it that wouldn't matter to a pure PoS paid scumbag would it? +I understand quite well how evolution is supposed to work. I understand the capriciousness and contingencies in the workings of evolution. It is the paragraph in question, especially the example in that paragraph, which distorts the workings of evolution. The phrase “it need only increase at a rate of 0.005 cm per generation (= 50 cm/10,000)” easily gives the impression of progressive linear change. The anthropocentric notions of directionality and purpose often (I assume inadvertently) find their way into the writings of specialists who attempt to explain various forms of Darwinian evolution. From these I have often read how evolution “invents” various forms and functions. Carl Sagan, in my opinion one of the worst offenders in these matters, injected anthropocentric notions on a massive scale so as to justify his idea of a million highly advanced technological civilizations in the Galaxy. I read your paragraph as suffering from the same notions of directionality. +" Sorry for the late reply; if you are willing to say how this works (or direct me to a tutorial of some sort), that would be helpful, but I will by no means demand it. I just noticed you and one other user were creating the images, and wanted to take part in some way. I won't be able to do anything until tomorrow afternoon (CDT), though. Thank you for taking the time to respond.  (talk) " +": Er, no, that's not how it works. We do not filter our edits to this or any other article through individual editors. If you do not like an edit, it is your prerogative to do something about it. ... speak! ... " +No silly it isnt ITS UR MOMS and might I say quite the lovely page indeed. Oh and UR MEAN no im just kiddding but ur not all that nice either...cause u have a black black heart.=( +And by the way, please take a look at the wiki on Alex Haley, who seems to be your source. +Pulp Fiction Would you recommend it? +June 2006 (UTC) Ermm...I actually designed and built the shopfront, are you really telling me what I was thinking when I did it? Hiding the crack was the ORIGINAL reason, not the ONLY reason. Another thing, the shopfront only 'juts out' by 6 inches in a couple places and is mainly set back from the building line by up to 4 feet! This creates the impression that it hangs out over the pavement. I will dig out a picture of the shopfront from the side if it will make you happy. Chris Ostwald, 21:40, 6 +Some that we know would claim that as OR, but I won't. As I said, if you want GB maybe find a source that says it? +"== Nazi PUNKS not Nazi Skinheads... == To those of you who wish to contribute to this article, please refrain from entering in information pertaining to Skinheads. The point of this article is to show the difference between Nazi punks and Nazi skinheads and to show that Nazi punks exist within the punk subculture. These are two different subcultures and though people often mistakenly call racist skinheads ""Nazi punks"" they aren't the same thing at all. " +70.146.212.249 Oh, don't tell me... (talk) +Ed, have you ever shown this kind of interest in any subject which did not directly relate to one of your pet peeves, such as criticism of the Unification Church, things you perceive as sexual immorality or legitimate science dismissing crank ideas? 76.105.223.232 +Undo Good job undoing and not discussing on the talk page! - [talk] +We own the project so how the heck is it Unambiguous copyright infringement????? And it wasnt written in a promotional way, it just explained the project and the system requirments! I'm starting to see why so many people hate wikipedia... +" Beyond the Call of Duty The Camouflage Cup For making World War II ship camouflage measures of the United States Navy‎ into such a splendid, accurate and informative article. I hope you will go on to create many more Camouflage articles. " +There was a bad redirect that dumped all talk onto the wrong page... +"I think the information given in Wikipedia about the languages ​​spoken in the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is manipulated, only reports the official language of the SADR and languages ​​spoken ""native"", why? languages ​​spoken ""native"" because they simply reported ""languages ​​spoken"" as if reported in the Wikipedia page of Western Sahara: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara. I really believe that you are using this formula ""spoken native language"" not to include the Spanish language as spoken in the SADR. who will believe that a country has Spanish as second administrative language, and no one speaks the language, even as a foreign language, I do believe that the page of the SADR in Wikipedia is manipulated and politicized, by editors Moroccan and expansionist Anglo deluded think that the lack of a second language vacuum administrative SADR, will favor the English language occupies that place, to the 2 I say that you are wasting your time, like it or not the Spanish language and will be the second administrative language of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, today and tomorow. " +((By the way, you can just use my Wikipedia userpage to get my email address)) +Sure, we can do that. You can go ahead and edit the article Swedish, French, Italian women. I think it is more of a regional thing that everybody around Georgia thinks that Georgian women are pretty. I don;t think that statement makes that much of a differece or requires that much of a discussion. I am sure we can cite it using on of the travel guides to Georgia. +Circumcision advocacy Jake, you've twice reverted on Circumcision advocacy without offering the slightest bit of explanation. Some people might consider this to be intentional edit-warring, but I'm going to assume good faith and instead politely remind you that edit comments are very important and that reverting without a stated reason is not considered to be a good practice. For now, I'm going to undo your changes again, but if you have a good reason, all you have to do is explain it. Thanks! +Italian Renaissance as a featured article == Before getting to the substance of my comment, let me just thank you for all the work you've done for Wikipedia; users like you are such an asset to the project. I do have one minor critique to make, though... I noticed that you promoted Italian Renaissance to featured status, but at the time, I had an actionable (and in my view appropriate) objection. (Candidate page, with my comments) I objected to elevation to featured status on the grounds that there are stylistic issues in the article, missing commas, etc. I went through the first half, but haven't had time to fix the second half. At any rate, you probably just didn't see my objection; I'll do more to address it myself, but the style isn't up to par for our (rightly) high standards for featured articles. talk == +July 2012 (UTC) He appears to have resumed editing with anonymous IPs almost immediately after your block. I've opened an SPI case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noormohammed satya so that others can start tracking and blocking the socks as well. — 12:27, 8 +" Not sure. The Roman army was made up of many ""disposable"" armies of mercenary and only the legions were true Roman decendents. I'm pretty sure military service was mandatory in order to remain in the Roman Empire. I see you are right about religious persecution. I must have been misinformed. Before an ethnic group could enter Roman boundaries to serve under Rome for their protection. " +It's obviously one of the people credited as providing voices for the game, however it'll be hard to determine which one. +" Let's have a beer to celebrate! Thanks for reviewing United States v. Kagama, a newly promoted featured article.  Boomer! " +Or I could simply change the caption so that it reads'a drain in Sydney being explored. The graffiti is there because it is there. It just happens to be in the photo +It appears that you two obviously should get along well together!. +I think I understand your position now. And that would certainly be effective at eliminating false credentials claims. However, it also would eliminate a great many true credentials claims, and the underlying premise of the proposal is that true claims are beneficial. You may disagree with that premise, but that's a different discussion. I would like to find a way to verify pseudonymous claims, while still generally preserving privacy. I do think that's possible within reason, although probably not in an absolutely fraud-proof way. As you point out in your opening contribution, the verifiers must be trusted since not just anyone could recheck (otherwise it wouldn't be preserve privacy). That's the main design challenge remaining, in my view. Derex +Warnings? Hey there is someone else on this IP. They are vandalizing. What do I do? -66.51.147.57 +SOCK PUPPETRY? IS USING ANY ACCOUNT WHATSOEVER CONSIDERED SOCK PUPPETRY? This site is a complete joke. I can't even edit using a *verifiable* account without being accused of violating some concocted offense. My address was censored because I was using an account which was apparently improperly named, so I am now using one that IS properly named (AFTER the probation period) and that in and of itself is apparently an offense. Logically, what is going on is that I am being unable to contribute in any way whatsoever because I am being repeatedly punished for a first offense spawned from ignorance. What kind of site are you people trying to run here?! It's no wonder the main founder of wikipedia turned his back on it when it's become such a blatant travesty of the intellectual honesty it purports to espouse. I have continuously been censored for editing a biased article- an article which is continuously edited by self-avowed marxists and anti-zionists (the very same people whose POV the article unashamedly puts forward). What kind of encyclopedia has articles that put forward opinion verified by echo chamber sources? If any editor attempted to put that sort of trash in Britannica they would be quickly disassociated with the publication- but it's quite apparent that Wikipedia has no controls whatsoever and has chosen to let the patients run the asylum. There is no use in attempting to run an objective and educational publication when the very people who have discredited the internet as a source of information are allowed to manipulate the site by sourcing the same intellectually dishonest sites that people use wikipedia to avoid. In short, explain yourselves- particularly Roland Rance, who has manipulated his position on this site to censor any points he disagrees with- all without explaining why. When you stop accepting the ridiculous assumption that senior members are beyond reproach, perhaps the site will gain some semblance of credibility. As it stands, wikipedia is just another example persistence winning over intelligence. +I was not talking about monetary fine, I meant vandalism results in blocking. I thought that according to wikipedia if well sourced info is removed for ideological reason constitutes as vandalism. I am still of the opinion, that information should be allowed freely and not be censored. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not the promotion page of Mirza's followers. +" December 2008 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. talk " +ZEST Uh.....hello....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZEST Thanks for your help !!!! +help Pls help me on the Hasan Sami Bolak article. User Kibele and her puppets are trying to make the article deleted as they did after a long political campaign in the Turkish wikipedia. You have enough language skills in English to tell people the facts better than me. Pls tell about their lynch campaign that they want to carry into English wikipedia. Thank you. 212.156.67.30 +Aaron Swartz Stop fucking reverting my goddamn edits!!! I think Aaron Swartz is a dumb-ass, and he should have been killed a long time ago. I know where you live; I WILL KILL YOU IF YOU REVERT ANY MORE PAGES!!!!! +AFD Just thought you should know Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters (2nd nomination). +, tending to take its cue from it once it's been establish there, +" trunkarchive.com Hi, Daniel. I noticed you blocked User:Trunkarchive. I suspect this user's activities formed part of a concerted promotional effort on the part of trunkarchive.com, a media-licensing company, to create bio articles on as many of the photographers in their stable as possible. Here are the other accounts, neither currently active, who may have been involved: Photofan76's contributions consist almost entirely of creating articles about photographers represented by trunkarchive.com. Several were deleted (see User talk:PhotoFan76), but a good many have survived. Perhaps some are speediable G11 or A7. Those that are not I could conceivably bulk-nominate to AfD with the exception of any that meet WP:CREATIVE. Even those that remain should probably have the ELs to trunkarchive.com removed under WP:ELNO 5: ""Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services"" I've also added trunkarchive.com to the list of proposed additions at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist Does this seem like a reasonable course of action? " +" Let's see if I can answer in an orderly fashion: Lead The point is that it was very much his own style, his trade mark. Looking at the sentence now, it makes perfect sense. Please do. ) I agree. That sentence was not ""hatched"" it was ""contrived"". Will think about it, suggestions welcome! Why not? I was just afraid that the article would be ""top heavy"" with a longer lead. I'll just put it in my notes for tomorrow, it's too late for me to think right now. General Learned something new here. Thanks! ) Please do. I've ""gone blind"" on the article for the moment... Early life My usual errors, not combining words. Please correct. ) Thanks! -Talk " +hello sir yunshi, sorry,i dont know sitush account used by multiple persons.please sir,for mutharaiyar articles i gave lot of reliable sources..please undo previous day deletion... +Hi, 牛岩, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article Simplified Manual of Style Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG. Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. ترجمة | թարգմանություն | tərcümə | пераклад | অনুবাদ | превод | 翻译 | თარგმანი | μετάφραση | અનુવાદ | תרגום | अनुवाद | 翻訳 | ಅನುವಾದ | បកប្រែ | 번역 | ການແປພາສາ | превод | भाषांतर करणे] | ترجمه | перевод | превод | மொழிபெயர்ப்பு | అనువాద | การแปล | переклад | dịch | | יבערזעצונג +Google search predominantly shows the mixed martial arts over the football player. +Arji, what makes you think this assertion is mistaken? It is not my assertion, it is the conclusion of this agencies report, taken to be reputable enough to be run by several respectable news carriers around the world. Naming me a troll is a classy touch, and calling for all dialogue with me to cease should be grounds for your indef banning from wikipedia. The fact that you and Kim don't believe the conclusions does not matter, the evidence passes WP:V and WP:RS. The evidence has been released to the media and no-one of repute (That's not you Kim BTW) has challenged the validity or accuracy of the study. The fact that the study doesn't include Chinas massive underground coal mine fires only helps the conclusions of the report. +":::::::Understood. And just wondering, why is this section called RfA? I am far from having enough experience to become an admin, nor do I have any wish to become one currently. Triple M " +" (UTC) It's common use is not as a proper noun. The dictionary article referenced in this article talks about the dispute between horse breeders, and ""people who are not in the horse-breeding business"". Wikipedia is not an encyclopaedia for horse breeders. It is for the public. 23:51, 6 June 2010" +Licensing issues In 2007, you created Malaysian Federal Roads System by copying from at least one other Wikipedia article. Where did it come from? If the source article is not identified, we can't use the text. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material in public domain, but retain the right to credit for their contributions. (talk) +" Friend, no problem with me. But just look at the discussion page and history of edits when ""suspicious"" persons are added. Croats or Serbs will claim he wasn't Bosniak but Croat or Serb, Bosniaks will denie and so on. But I'm glad you proposed Tvrtko, I'm considering to later add total number of votes, so we will see.fuchs " +" The subject of the ongoing attempts by politically biased Wikipedia editors to suppress any mention of Neil deGrasse Tyson's embarrassment has prompted widespread derision from the political right. ""[B]logs and conservative opinion pieces"" may not be reliable for statements of fact (see [WP:BIAS]), but if they are well-known, high-traffic, non-fringe, etc. they (National Review, Volokh Conspiracy, Weekly Standard. etc., etc.) ABSOLUTELY establish the existence of a controversy. Partisan dismissals of the significance of the controversy from the other side of the political spectrum subtract nothing from that fact. " +As far as I know there were no warrants of arrest for Thomas Jefferson from the British Crown. There is nothing in the writings of Thomas Jefferson that states he was committing treason and could be hung. Jefferson, Washingtion, and Adams, according to Ferling (2000) believed they were slaves to the British government, not having any rights. They did not view themselves as outlaw rebels, rather, they wanted to be free to make their own laws that protected white people. Franklin apparently is the only Founding Father who mentioned being hung. Was Jefferson in the room at the time Franklin made this statement? +That's my point. I looked for false positives or any feature that would distinguish these accounts, and there was none to be found. The unpleasant situation is that we had a user with a history of exactly this sort of problem with a set of circumstances, reported by users in good standing, that exactly matched sock puppetry. I had to make a difficult judgment call per all the available information, and the conclusion was a finding of sock puppetry. I have invited checkusers, and others, to review the report. Everything is available for inspection and comment. Talk +i found this article on crime in managua its from 2006 wich means its recent facts that need to be used for this section i didnt copyright i changed alot of thw phrases Managua the Epicenter of crime in Nicaragua Managua experienced a rise in violence and crime throughout 1990's. Violent crime in Managua is for various reasons such as political violence, Civil war crime and delinquency. Gangs in Managua are a widespread phenomenon that is growing fast. Currently managua has more than 110 gangs with more than 8,000 members. These gangsare responsible for 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua. violence and gang warfare is prevalent.These gangs are responsible for theft, mugging, pick-pocketing they also have involvement in the drug trade among other criminal activities.[2] and this is the original one Managua, Nicaragua epicenter of crime in Nicaragua experienced rising levels of violence and criminality throughout 1990s 40% of all crimes in Nicaragua committed in Managua – half of these reported crimes considered violent nature of violence and violent crime shifts from political violence and civil war to crime and delinquency Pandillas – youth gangs – in Managua now a prevalent and widespread phenomenon – growing rapidly currently more than 110 pandillas with approximately 8,000 members concentrated in lower-class barrios – poverty and lack of opportunity drive membership territorially based in specific neighbourhoods defend territory as a source of identity and pride Lower class barrio in Managua Pandillas commit variety of crime, often employing firearms responsible for disproportionate share of criminal activity commit 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua violence and gang warfare prevalent robbery, mugging, pick-pocketing and involvement in drug trade among other criminal activities and here is the link http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/focus/youth_gun/managua9_e.htm +" Addressing: While ""Indian tribe"" is official US Gov't lingo, saying ""tribe"" twice in the first sentence and then again in the second is awkward, also ""the tribe"" is not a monolithic entity, but rather a collection of people - so maybe reword to say something like ""The Coeur d'Alene people once inhabited 3,500,000 acres (1,400,000 ha) in northern Idaho and Washington,[2][3] (And Montana, actually, note article on the tribe) but today, the only land controlled by the tribal nation is the Coeur d'Alene Reservation in Benewah and Kootenai counties, Idaho.[4]"" You don't have to use my wording, but you see how I am distinguishing land and people, though the two are, of course, closely intertwined. .  Boomer! Second and third paragraphs jump around and need another copyedit. I'd put right up front that Johnson did the executive order but Congress never acted on it, then go on about how the tribe didn't accept it anyway? Keep the chronology clearer. (Interesting that the Coeur d'Alene article says nothing about this period, maybe finish here and add a bit to that article too... hmmm) From a VERY cursory review of the decision, it appears that gap between creation of the reservation and Idaho's statehood becomes significant in this case, so perhaps give us a bit of foreshadowing that this is not just a dry fact, but it's something that's going to matter. The section fails to draw out the significance of the info on the state park and mining, maybe add a wee bit to hint at why this will matter in the SCOTUS case." +The answer to that question has finally been found; Justin Timberlake is one of the artists that does that song; Gap Band nephew Snoop Dogg interpolates lyrics from Early in the Morning in the 2005 song Signs. +" Pseudonymous editing copied from an email received offline Hi, I'm not quite sure how this works, but your wrote in my deletion review, ""you say that your name and address are available, but your contributions to Wikipedia are pseudonymous."" Does this mean I hadn't registered? I did so last night, and not under a pseudonym as most people have. I always use my real name in signatures. And I don't know how to post to your talk page because there appears to be no ""post"" link. Thanks, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz bathory@bathory.org bathory@maltedmedia.com Thanks for your message but I think perhaps my meaning was still unclear. Whether you register or not doesn't really matter since anyone can register under any name. I could go online and register a Wikipedia account as George W. Bush (at least, if it's not already taken). Wikipedia has no means to authenticate your identity independently. All that we know - all that we can know - is what you choose to claim about yourself. That's what I meant by pseudonymously - any registration, even if you say that it's your real name, is technically a pseudonym. It is not independently verified against some external identity database. And for the most part, that works out very well on Wikipedia. We want users and editors to establish themselves through their actions and to demonstrate their expertise through their edits, not by making claims to outside credentials. By the way, anyone could also register as Dennis Bathory-Kitzs. That trivial misspelling would be easily overlooked by readers but would still be accepted by the system. Such a person could sign their name the same way you do, attempt to mimic your pattern of speech (well, writing really) and make subtle edits just to discredit you. That, in fact, is a real problem for established editors of Wikipedia. When we find usernames that are suspiciously similar to established users, we look very carefully for signs of vandalism or deceit. Users who appear to have done something like that on purpose are generally banned from Wikipedia. But those are all manual checks. There is no system that can automatically detect or prevent it. Likewise, no one can inherently trust the email address. The way internet domains are set up, anyone could register bathory.org and create any email name they wanted. Like Wikipedia accounts, emails and internet domains are unverified against any external identity authority. And that's before you consider the problems of email spoofing and forgery - both of which are far easier and common today than any of us would like to admit. Most people are honest. But there are enough dishonest people out there that we have to build our systems and our procedures in such a way that it doesn't matter whether they are telling the truth about their identity or not. That's why Wikipedia has a policy against original research (which we mean as ""a contribution or assertion based on personal experience"") and why we never rely solely on self-published materials and why we bias our policy so strongly in favor of reliable sources such as websites owned by and operated by large, well-known organizations - organizations with both a vested interest in and the resources to find and stop spoofing. Sorry to bore you with all this but my non-Wikipedia profession is information security. The inherent problems of identity management and authentication occupy much of my waking hours. How can a bank know that you're really you? And how far can that trust be extended? Under what conditions can an assertion be treated as reliable? How do we balance that against the need to make systems and computers easy and accessible. Unfortunately, there are no easy answers short of establishing a national identity database - something which would be in great tension with my role as a privacy advocate. Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now. Thanks for your message. To post to my Talk page, just go to the page and edit it like you would edit any page on Wikipedia. The most common technique is to use the little plus sign next to the ""edit this page"" tab at the top. That will automatically create a new section and give you a line to create a section header without having to know the wiki-markup symbols. You should also get in the habit of signing your posts on Talk pages. You can do that easily by ending your comment with four tildes (~~~~). When you save the page, the MediaWiki software will replace the tildes with your username and the date-timestamp. Again, welcome to Wikipedia. (talk) " +well, change it then. +" I really didn't expect it to ""fly."" Thanks for the affirmation. " +Barek, why are you abu$ing the deletion function? You ju$t deleted a bunch of edit$ and page-move log$ that do not meet the criteria for deletion. I $uggest you rever$e your deletion$, or you will be de-$y$opped. +Clearly a partisan gesture. I'll discuss this further when I am able to edit freely. —aco +" Copyright problems with Image:Siaeconomy.jpg An image that you uploaded, Image:Siaeconomy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 2 " +Trivia section/everthing else you butchered: Not the place for it Then where does it belong then!? +ISP's My ISP is randomly assigned so unless you ban the whole of my ISP provider I can just register again so I'll do what JFW does and act in cyberspace as I please. +REDIRECT Talk:List of Lyon Metro stations +, and just because some band or swear word appeals to your apparently juvenile sensibilities does not make it noteworthy enough to warrant inclusion on this site +" I don't attribute motive; rather, I note behavior. You have yet again shown up at an article which SlimVirgin regularly edits and started editing there, within minutes of her last edit. You were warned quite clearly to stop doing this; with any luck, a 24 hour block will help enforce the importance of this. (talk) " +Thanks. Happy New Year to you too. I probably need some help with the citations. I keep on using: TITLE OF ARTICLE HERE [link here] +F.Y. punk, VidGmr was my homie. It's was due to some faggot named Klptyzm. +" Romanians Hi. In the Romanians article there is a section titled ""Contributions to humanity"". I have no problem with the content it's just the title sounds kind of POV. Do you have any idea for a re-wording? Alex " +Um, sure ECW initials mean something, but they don't mean hardcore wrestling, and least not entirely. Does the name Chris Benoit, Rey Mysterio Jr, Dean Malenko, Eddie Guerrerro, Chris Jericho.... I could go on and on and on mean anything to ya? ECW was more then hardcore wrestling, it was the innovator of everything we see on TV today. Not taking away anything from XPW, because it was great. But it was almost EXCLUSIVELY hardcore garbage wrestling. ECW wasn't. +After eight years of editing, you bet I've read WP:Disambiguation ) Now, have you read it? In particular, you might want to look at the set index articles section ) Danilovsky District is a set index, and as categorized as such. Cheers,— • (yo?); October 2, 2012; 02:01 (UTC) +mediation I know we haven't exactly departed on good terms (but hey it's been like 2 years ago and I'm over it), but you seem the most rational on that side of the camp. So apparently, Ksyrie and co. think I'm censoring Chinese views when I clearly purposed that they can move the shit they want to the background section. I just want that retarded section out of there. It's redundant when the section above it talks about the same thing. Now they haven't responded to me at all in the talk page (this have been going on for months mind you) and I can't report them for 3rr so I'd appreciate it if you would look into this. I think you being 'one of them' and a admin will help. Thanks. +Finally stop your edit wars and your crusade! If there is censorship, then it is done by you as you removed correct information. +I agree with you, corollary is the word to be used in english. (Lina.lasse) +]]. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. +I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I asked how much of our language was replaced with words from French and Italian. Are you saying that our language was replaced by 70-80 percent with French and Italian words? I'm guessing there is a misunderstanding here, but yes, please can a script to find out. Do anything you can. We should know these figures. +REDIRECT Talk:The Bear (1998 film) +Hapsford Please cite sources for this article. Otherwise, it may be tagged as a candidate for deletion in the near future. Cheers. ++ +No, you are the racist, you goddamn neo-Nazi YOU BIG BOY +The previous proposal was closed on 16 February. Today is 23 February. We're repeating what was said there. Let's close and hat. We can revisit this in a year. +REDIRECT Talk:Gare de Lyon rail accident +" The article is not just about the incident with the two guys, that for some reason didn't wanted to talk to the police. The name of the article is - if you didn't notice it - the ""2005 Paris riots"". It's about the riots and it's relevant to mention that previously there has also been other incidents of religious/political unrest/violence in that specific area. " +Manufacturer/AKA PrinceGloria, please go read the Infobox conventions. The Vibe's Manufacturer is Pontiac, not the NUMMI plant. Also, no one ever agreed that the Matrix/Vibe were related. Please read this discussion again. You are the only person who contended that the Matrix and Vibe were related and not AKA. +" Smile album re-recording vocals- how much? It doesn't say for sure in the article, and I'm not necessarily saying it should say in the article, but does anyone know how much re-recording of the lead and background vocals were done for the songs on Brian Wilson Presents SMiLe album? I'm looking for this info and not finding it. Did he re-record all the vocals or did he use some of the originals recorded by the Beach Boys in the 60s? Specifically on the songs ""Good Vibrations"" or ""Heroes and Villians"". Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. " +This is absolutely false. I cannot believe what's going on. First I make an edit that obviously conforms to Wikipedia standards and is a helpful contribution, and it gets edit-warred down by 2 or 3 people who don't care about what belongs on Wikipedia. And now you make ridiculous false accusations of sock-puppetry because someone else agrees with my edit which was obviously right in the first place?! I certainly need an admin to reconsider what's going on - maybe I need to appeal this. +Scope Please see the link above, as I'm sure you are a fucking spastic +Move? Should cuisine in the title name be capitalized? It's capitalized at the beginning of the article. If so, may I move the article? - +You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours due to vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. +Gabriel Fahrenheit I would like this page to be unprotected and returned to the state where me and IntimateCarbon have aggred to a compromise. 02:10, 27 Oct 2003 (UTC) +" Your response required in achieving consensus Hi please respond here > Talk:Assassinations_and_murders_attributed_to_the_LTTE#Consensus_to_redirect Talk " +Firefox I still can't quite figure out what the history and even current situation with that is. As of 2012 appeared to default to Direct2D, but not to DirectWrite . +I found a better reference. In ,page 24, Theoretically, polygamy can assume any one of three possible forms: polygyny or the marriage of one man to two or more wives at a time, polyandry or the coexistent union of one woman with two or more men, and group marriage or a marital union embracing at once several men and several women. Of these, only the first is common. And on page 25 A statistical analysis of Kaingang genealogies for a period of 100 years showed that 8 per cent of all recorded unions were group marriages, as compared with 14 per cent for polyandrous, 18 per cent for polygynous, and 60 per cent for monogamous unions. The disadvantage of working at a medical school is that the anthropology texts are not extensive, but they aren't checked out often either. This had been sitting on the shelf for over 20 years, deep in the recesses of the basement. Murdock is a sufficient reference for polygamy including group marriage. +" Why again are you making off-topic interjections? I did not delete it, I moved it and even gave it its own heading. Your comment was not at all about a new name and even then not at all persuasive, and even non sequitur as I quite clearly pointed out above - but even my own comment was off topic, so I moved this as well! You're making much of someone else's quite calculated ado about nothing. Even this should be moved to a topic of its own - but with your permission this time if it would cover all bases. This was a constructive discussion. " +. This illustrates the difference between an encyclopedic and an unencyclopedic fact. +, 26 October 2015 (UTC) RESPONSE: I contribute entry with reference to COMELEC Official Publication. I have no conflict of Interest with COMELEC. John Petalcorin No, but you do have a conflict by editing an election article while participating in the election. As stated below, Wikipedia is not for electioneering. 19:49 +No need, as abstracts are intended for non-experts. This particular abstract is very clear. Thanks for the offer though (not for your misinterpretation of the paper). +Thanks for the info about double redirects. Kind of new to them. I'm up at 1:07 AM contributing to wikipedia, man this is crazy. +- This was done in an effort to correct the lies that chinamanjoe has been spreading through this site +Citation #4. Why is that even there? The article has nothing to do with Alien Nation what so ever. +"::Well, I hope you (or someone else) get it working again, as I think it's a very useful tool. Thanks for writing it, and I look forward to any updates. - ♫♦♫ " +" I don't disagree, but there ideally should be a description of the band's style (elsewhere in the lead?).  🍁 ¡gobble! " +UK Release Date In the most recent issue of the Official Nintendo Magazine it states on an advert for a particular company that the game will be released on the 30th May. Would I need to maybe scan this page and send it to someone for proof?? +" 2007 (UTC) Well, see first if anyone at the page is question objects to unlocking - without bias towards future editorial decisions. D 14:21, 23 July" +Danville Thanks for letting me know about the fixes to the Danville page. I'm embarrassed that I didn't pick up on that elementary flim-flam move with the town's url. There was another long-running attempt to override the town's page several months earlier; it's nice to have additional people keeping an eye out. +Latest CIDESCO article deleted as blatant copy vio. If you really want to write this article, please write it yourself and find some reliable external sources to use. +It's in spanish but it's the truth, If you don't cite this you are acting like the fraken gatekeeper know it all, you aren't shit. +" Hmmm. I was actually writing a response as you sent yours. Oh well. For the record, my response was this: Resurrecting articles is frowned upon, yes. We might be able to get away with it if the article we resurrect is a substantial improvement on the last one, however - though of course we both know that there's no guarantee it would ultimately be accepted whatever we did - there is an established bias towards deleting articles on individual matches. Changing the name would be nice but I'm not sure what we would change to...the game didn't really have a ""name"" like the Ballet on Ice or any such, and there are limited other ways of naming the article. Making this subpage was a decent idea, you just got unlucky in that it's something that has already been tried elsewhere and ultimately voted against. Honestly I can say I've never seen a subpage for an actual mainspace article so I have no idea how much people tend to chase these articles up or whether it might just glean a community-wide shrugging of the shoulders. Certainly there's been no AfD nomination yet, which is a start. I have to say I somewhat favour making it a standalone article or merging with the season article (i.e. not keeping the subpage) but I don't have strong feelings so I'll run with whatever works. If it got categorised it would either be put into a category for something like Category:Football matches (I have no idea if that exists, it was another example) and Category:FA Cup and then probably into a new category for City matches or comebacks or somesuch where it probably would be on its own. That category would then have to be categorised so it wasn't just an orphan. I don't know what the ethic is here for creating categories with only a single article in them but I suspect it's not encouraged, so that idea might be rejected if (whoever did it) couldn't find more like-minded articles to categorise into the same. I don't think it being categorised would really affect anyone's opinion of the article though. The one thing that might affect peoples' judgement right now is that it will (in its present form) show up in categories as ""2003–04 Manchester City F.C. season/Spurs 3-4 City"" or however the subpage is actually named, given the / in the name. Yes, I'd say it will currently be located in an overarching ""please categorise these pages"" category. I don't know how long it would take for it to get sorted, but it would probably be put somewhere generic. Better to do it ourselves, I guess. Sorry my thoughts were a bit disjointed but I was answering the points as they came and...well, better English just didn't quite flow from my fingers as I typed. Hopefully I addressed all your points. I'll settle for just keeping the subpage if you want it, though I think that page would be best served by being redone - with as many citations as possible - and expanded upon, so we can argue a case for it being reincluded into society, so to speak. Having an article AfD'ed isn't a permanent sign that that article should never exist, it's merely a suggestion that it shouldn't exist in the state it's in. Generally speaking most articles that get deleted will be kept the second time around if their quality and/or level of detail is substantially improved. As for the Charity Shield, I always considered it a notable trophy. Yes, it's a single game, but it requires winning a trophy to qualify in the first place (ignoring those early years when some teams refused to play). To this end, I'd consider it more of an accomplishment than winning the trophy which qualified you for it. Similarly, would you question the worthiness of the European Super Cup? In fact, because some teams initially didn't enter, City were instrumental in making the Charity Shield the respected competition it is today by taking their place in the competition twice. You could argue that of all the teams to have ever played in it, we should be the ones most ardently defending it. Talk " +" why don't you ""REMOVE"" my free speech you goddamned self, you whiny little pipsquak. That's all you seem to be good at doing." +September 17th vandalized This date which was vandalized by 142.162.64.146 I know the one who did it was Kagome 77 as the IP traces to St John's Newfoundland. As his/her Ip Address goes to the same location his/her home address which i will not reveal. I don't want to make this hard on you Kagome 77 but you left me no choice. I've noticed many articles you vandalized and I'm sick of it. Kagome 77 all I'm saying is grow up please stop acting like a child before you gets in worse trouble with the law. +Not really sure what the issue is here What is The Name of the Rose? It is a book. Is it a fictional library? No, it is not. Is it a fictional librarian? No, it is not, for a real book cannot be a fictional anything. So stop bloody adding real things to categories for fictional things. Not that difficult, really. +" A barnstar for you! The Writer's Barnstar Thanks, Belovedfreak! I'm just learning how to send messages, so I'm sorry I took so long to reply to you. Have fun editing! " +im new to this so I really don't know what im doing do anybody want to help?????????????? +In case this helps I asked again at Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#Helping_going_away. Thanks. - +Kirsten Kemp There is nothing wrong with the Kirsten Kemp edit to Saved by the Bell. Please quit reversing it. +POV forking I combined POV fork paragraphs in the article per WP:POVFORK. I also organized redundant references for sake of not deleting them but they will need to be culled. There's a lot of primary sources and original research in the citations that need to be removed. The POV forks dealt with are: 1. Korean vs Japanese origin of TKD. This POV fork existed in the opening of history section and the modern developments section. 2. Historical context behind Japanese ban of Korean MA. POV fork existed in opening paragraph of modern development section and then again in the third paragraph. The third paragraph also contained editor personal comments and ruminations which is considered original research WP:OR. +"At bat; Edit Warring at Matt Joyce (baseball), Juan Encarnación, Terry Tiffee, Ian Kinsler, Craig Breslow, Matt Guerrier, etc.== Please don't change ""At bat"" to ""at-bat"". ""At-bat"" just redirects right back to at bat anyway. - I agree. I agree because he is correct that it should not be hyphenated. In addition, pls stop edit warring at Matt Joyce (baseball), Ian Kinsler, Craig Breslow, etc. And add to the list Matt Guerrier. It is perfectly accurate and reasonable to reflect his won lost record. There is no reason to delete it, other than your penchant for disruptive edits. Kindly desist. It has also been explained to you, with proper citations, that the plural of RBI is RBIs. Pls stop edit warring this point. See Juan Encarnación and Terry Tiffee. That is vandalism. Run batted in says: ""The term may be pluralized as either RBI or RBIs"". Obviously not vandalism then but a difference in opinion then. @Matt Guerrier, the reason it didn't show up was because a ""|"" was missing, and with your edit you re-removed it and duplicated info. It's amazing how you continue to assume bad faith, blindly reverting and editwarring over messages on his own talk page...  (t / c) Danged if this little war isn't over some seriously picayune crap. Both sides are being a bit petty here, because really either set of edits is acceptable on these pages (well, except for the bolded Contract on Ian Kinsler either make it a subhed or take it off, seriously). Oh, and technically, the plural of RBI is RsBI, but that just looks clunky. In common usage, ""RBI"" is used for either singular ""Run Batted In"" or plural ""Runs Batted In"". ""RBIs"" is a bastardization used only because it's simpler from a usage standpoint. Either way, I think everyone involved in this should chill out for a few days and just leave all these pages alone. - Jackal4, again, is making a rash of these edits on every page I touch. As to RBIs, as X96lee15 pointed out the most thorough treatment is at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball/Archive_5#RBIs. Plus, mlb.com is the official reporter of baseball, and uses the RBIs convention. Yet, Jackal4's reaction to that is to go on pages where I have written it thus, to delete the s as though the s is incorrect. He has done the same with ""at bat"" which he insists must be hyphenated. Etcetera .... these are just two of the types of reverts he feels impelled to make of my edits. It is picayune, but it is wrong to revert perfectly good edits. If he insisted on lower-casing RBIs, or any similar degradation, I would think it wrong of him to follow people around and revert perfectly good edits. There is enough good work he could perform instead. Well, I can't stop him from wasting time if that's what he wants to do ) . As for ""thorough treatment"", I'm not sure I consider a bit to which a grand total of two people contributed particularly thorough. I respect Kingturtle, but I think he's got it wrong on this one. Regarding what mlb.com uses, you're appealing to the wrong authority, because it's not a terminology issue, it's a grammar issue. In any case, at this point I have no doubt that these edits are being reverted simply because you're both watching for each other's names on your watchlists. Allow me to again encourage the both of you to just stay away from each other's edits entirely for a while and allow the bad feelings to ebb. At the rate you're going, you're both going to get blocked. - Jargon overrides grammar. To say that a batter ""flied out"" is probably not good grammar either, but it's proper baseball terminology. I think this needs to be discussed at the project page, assuming anyone's watching that page anymore. [[User:Baseball +FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU +Thanks Alan thanks for the intro to wiki, you dumb guido, but I think I can figure it out for myself, hotshot. get a real job. +== Oh, no, you needn't worry. Except for working crossword puzzles and using it as a highly questionable reference source, I am, I assure you, through with Wikipedia. +" ""V-Prop"" should be ""VProp"" ""V-Prop"" should be ""VProp"". I propose that we change the name of the page and make the appropriate chnges to the text. " +Bob Parsons Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +}|yes|The committee's decision is still in effect, and can be found in the [ page history].}} |} +"==On the Removal of the Redirect== This page used to redirect to 19th Century Philosophy. I'm not too familiar with the specifics of wikipedia's policies, but I think this redirect was misleading. I also think this article probably deserves a page of its own. The History of Western Philosophy has a decent section on ""modern philosophy."" How to deal with this overlap, I don't know... but if modern philosophy is going to be a redirect, maybe it should go to History of Western Philosophy." +" You were wrong and you know it. I never was ""vandalising"" the page129.2.44.118 " +- unsigned comment +Your low self-esteem I see you have such a low self-esteem that you have to warn others not to attack you.4.130.134.233 +I guess you got a stalemate then? ( I actaully searched for Keediz on line and like you found nothing, But I have heard it used on TV loads of times. I really love children (In a legal way) and I hate adults treating them like idiots. Never the less your threats have been taken into acount and as I'm not yet finished with this site, I will refrain from posting anything Keediz realated unless I can provide proof, and to be on the safe side I will ASK you before I do so. I hope we have a neutral understanding, but this doesn't remove my pain. +Bold text Italic text +"== May 2015 == Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. " +WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? STOP CRITIZING US!!! YOU'RE WRITING IN OPINION!! FUCK STOP THIS! MADDOX IS A PRICK +" Kidnap (2015 film) Please move Draft:Kidnap (2015 film) to Kidnap (2015 film) - Thanks. «T ♦ C ♦ » " +why did u block me ummm ya so why did u block me +Mereger? Please explain why you merged an article which was deleted into this article? Most of it is OR and has no place in an article whatsoever. +Velvet Sky When are you guys gonna get her profile up and running +Ruskin Fellowship Hi, as a recent change patroller I noticed an edit of yours to the Ruskin Fellowship article. I think that you are doing a great job, so I hope that you won't feel that I'm being overly critical if I say that I noticed your liberal use of capitalisation. I would encourage you to attempt to follow the guidelines for capitalisation in the manual of style. I know there is a lot in it to digest in one sitting. Hopefully, by making you aware that it exists, I will be helping you to learn a new skill. Keep up the good work. +You've been warned before - please stop. (t) 17:57, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) +.When I am providing with reliable source where ganga lal gupta has clearly proof that kushwaha come under kshatriya varna. you mother fucker do you have blind eyes that you cant see it +" He uses a song called ""Warm it Up Kane"" in the beginning by rapper Big Daddy Kane from his It's A Big Daddy Thing album." +It is a separate line from the street railway line that connected to Ramona Park in the same area. +I haven't inserted those. Even I myself am against that. +You have just risen 1000% in my estimation. 202.142.129.66 +Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Philosophy *Talk:Aesthetic Realism. Should the article be permitted to include historical information that current teachers of the philosophy seek to deemphasize? +Toddst1, I understand your point, so I created my own +William S Saturn is a sockpuppet Hey dickweed Saturn, remember me? You dumb fat bitch +Umberto Colombo article Starting point for this article was the Umberto Colombo article at it.wikipedia.org->Google Translate->English speaker edits->small amount of additional info based on a few new sources were added. Um, is there anything I need to do to be onside copyright-wise? +Handing out blocks using Twinkle. What a fucking disgrace. — lfdder +nonsense are you a boy or a girl +Right now, I haven't done anything really wrong yet. I made a quality edit, and stood by it when some power-hungry mod reverted it. All the drama would have been prevented if DA had simply apologized, rather than just increasing my warning level. 76.119.75.131 +I got a reply from Asmen. He will translate the text, but he told me that it might take little bit time because he is busy nowadays. Incubator:User:Maviulke12 +Alright! Thanks. I see it moved over to the labs now. That's cool. I used to do a bunch by hand and it was really tedious, but this looks manageable. +" Doctrine of the Holy Crown Some wiki troll deleted the ""Doctrine of the Holy Crown"" article, which is a constitution like the Constitution of Sweden or the Constitution of the United Kingdom, and confused ot with the ""Holiness of the crown"" belief. It is a constitutional legal topic (similar to the British and Swedish article) and it is not about religious beliefs of the crown. Péease restore the independent ""Doctrine of the Holy Crown"" article." +" European Borders There is a BIG problem going on about whether Republic of Georgia and other neighboring countries should be included in Europe or not .As you know there is no official border between europe and Asia and there is a great number of unofficial versions .so you might think that it is LOGICAL to explain all of the versions that exist for today on that page.......... well sadly thats not what most editors think. they put one version there and every time I changed it, it went back to the previous version. now I am just wondering do these people think it is their personal page or what gives them the right to rely on several sources and ignore other ones that are not any less trust me. They should definately offer every version of where the border goes between the two continents instead of putting only one version and not even bothering to explain why, it is unacceptable. I contacted one of the editors and he/she said that he chose that version because he/she ""thinks it is the most neutral one"". I am sorry but what some users ""think"" should be completely irrelevant while making an article on the website which has an ambition to be Credible. they should include all of the versions or not include anything at all before there is an OFFICIAL border ! Council of Europe, the oldest organization in europe classifies country as european, country is in the middle of the NATO membership process (only european countries are eligible for it according to the North Atlantic Treaty) and they are not even mentioning why they left it out. Turkey is not the case because it was already amember of nato. cant they understand that page is not about the EU. its the entire europe as a whole and until the borders will be determined OFFICIALLY all of the versions should be included. I really want to ask someone to take care of it as they dont seem to understand my very logical argument and even used some rude words in private messages. " +To re-emphasize, this entire paragraph was extremely judgemental. Even if you think all lawsuits should be barred, and victims (many who died as a result of asbestos) should be labeled 'shams', this is not appropriate for any encyclopedia. +I fully agree with recommending the image for deletion, especially in light of the dubious claims as to its authenticity. While his hair does have some natural wave, it is nowhere near that long or curlyto say nothing of the clear differences in face shape, length, width, and symmetry. Some of the first image results on a Google search are T.R. with longer/wavy hair, and there is no resemblance to the individual in the picture being debated. In terms of specific detailsyou've claimed this is a recent picture from T.R.'s breaka date that the picture was taken would be a good start. +" More description of location please? Hello, I wondered if someone with the requisite local knowledge would please consider adding a short sentence, maybe in the description section, to explain where this bridge is? I do appreciate that its location is already described in the lead as crossing between things X and Y but if you don't already know Stockton well (or recently!) this is not necessarily all that helpful. I was wondering if you could write a more bottom-up description which says something like ""the bridge crosses the Tees at blah (or near Blah Street etc); it is A hundred metres downstream from the Foo Bridge and B hundred metres upstream from the Bar Barrage"" or whatever, which it seems to me would nail it in more empirical terms. What do you think? Any yes, of course the maps link does nail it (assuming the co-ordinates are right!) but something in the text which helps in this way would, I think, be very useful. I may be being unusually thick (happens all the time, actually) but on my first reading - and I was last in Stockton in 2007, you see - I was not at all sure where it was, wondering if in fact it replaced the other rather nice pedestrian bridge closer to the town centre. I cured this uncertainty by looking at the maps, yes, but the sentence I'm asking for would have given me more direct access to the knowledeg. Go on, please write it for me, you know you want to; and I will go and put the kettle on for you. Thanks and best wishes " +JG55 wow thanxs for getting be and balz blocked maybe if u mine your own business and woundlnt talk to us were 10 years old and u are tlaking to us and we told u to stop so plz do thanx u +Automatic protection for Main Page? It would be straightforward to write a bot that (1) protected all images on the main page, adding Template:Mprotected, and (2) unprotected all images with Template:Mprotected that no longer appeared on the main page. Feature (2) would be genuinely useful and save editors work. However, if editors came to rely on feature (1) then that would introduce a risk, because there would always be a gap between an image appearing on the main page and the bot protecting it. A clever vandal could vandalize the image in that gap. And worse, the bot would end up protecting the vandalized version of the image. I suppose the bot could attempt to detect vandalism like that but you can see how complex the process could become. 08:13, 2005 May 13 (UTC) +''' Superscript text +" Finally, I would not be referring to the article on ""alternate theories on the Plame affair"" if rewinn had not recommended moving material from this article to that article. That article still has disputed neutrality, and I do not think that it is an article to recommend reading.NYScholar " +This it isn't a debate, its a discussion (see (WP:POLL]]). You can likely find references that use both terms, that is the problem, and why gaining WP:consensus is exactly the right thing to do. The purpose is to air out all sides under equal terms, and avoid edit wars and arguments. +" Wishaw General Hospital A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Wishaw General Hospital, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . " +Interaction Parameter, R0 Is there any reason the method for calculating the interaction parameter is not mentioned anywhere? It just seems to be introduced as some mythical concept rather than pointing out that it is determined through trial and error based on empirical evidence of what solvents dissolve the material. +This song was coverd by Paul Torrence, Tanner Viox, The Banjo sisters, and The super BEbop Boys featuring Al Gore. +RfC: Earlier it was reported that the name of the rape victim was said to be revealed as Jyoti Singh Pandey but later it was proven untrue. Can the unproven name be included in the article? Earlier it was reported the name of the rape victim was revealed on the request of her father but later it was reported that the father never gave permission nor revealed the name. Should this unproven or false name be included in the article? +" Not a problem. I would suggest you start by drafting up the article on your computer. Get some good text, some sources, and figure out what types of wikilinks you want to include. Also, you will want to mark it with {{stub}} if it's short. See WP:STUB for more details on making a good stub. Alternatively, you can create a subpage in your userspace such as (C•T•) " +Are you kidding? Take your threats and shove em. +Thanks Hi i'm italian user SoloTitano. Thanks for your work about Sanmarinese footballers and San Marino Calcio's players (i'm a fan of this team). Your work is great, and I hope to use your informations also on it.wiki. Infact I create articles about San Marino Calcio and Sanmarinese sportspeople =) You can also create a category about San Marino Calcio's players like it:Categoria:San Marino Calcio. Contact me for everything and if I can help you =) it:Utente:SoloTitano. Bye +Here's an example:http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/wolf-blitzer-shows-off-cnns-emmy-award/ That's the type of link that supports the claim.99.135.169.168 +am i able to get a refund on my donation? +no fuckin make me fudge packer 'gwernol'[more like queerhole] +" This article was nominated for deletion on December 6, 2005. The result of the discussion was redirect to Beauxbatons. An archived record of this discussion can be found here." +What was classed as a severe adverse reaction? Just status epilepticus and psychosis? Is +Buying a lotto ticket doesn't count either, or does it? I've presented a logical argument with a full half of the glyphs uncontested. Perhaps this counts for something... +It is important as it was by the means of this contest that Colombian artists like Fernando Botero, were able to travel outside colombia and florish as well as to gain name recgnition in Colombia. ( ) +, or any backbone to the administrators, you all will toss out Gryffindor's farcical behavior. You would think these German speakers could be fair, could live with compromise. Then you see people saying that the current name was all a conspiracy. Yes, of course. Utterly pathetic. +G'day Fayssal Hope you're good -) - I must also take this opportunity to let you know that almost every time I see your username around the place, I get that catchy 80s electro tune in my head - your very own soundtrack -) What brought me here really though was your comment in the arbitration amendment thing that someone filed about 'my' case - it's all kind of a long time ago now, of course, but I did (and do) find the irony of having run '' as a long term sock rather delicious - the fact that Guy ran these two accounts all came out ages ago too, if you're a curious wiki-historian (or have present concerns, I guess?) then let me know if diff.s would be handy, otherwise I just felt it was worth clarifying what I was on about -) cheers, +I have read Milton's book, and he mentions the work of Hoyle, Sheldrake, Reich etc +" The first thing I noticed was a random edit from an anon IP requesting help - , no idea what that was about, then I noticed it had been checked by someone and then someone else had placed the WHOIS template, which advertised my internet details and prompted a WHOIS search on me, advising that ""any vandalism from here should be reported.."" I thought this was inappropriate and not needed, because I am an established and respectable user. 94.192.38.247 " +The CityRail Station alt template is fine as it is. It doesn't need more changing - we've already had endless debate which resulted in the template that we have now, and I'm not interested in any more. I'd prefer you go and fix something that needs work on it, not something that doesn't. +" I've changed the heading along the lines you suggested, to ""Criticisms of Michael Dorris"", which I hope tackles the question you raised. Feel free to alter it further, of course! " +ow! someone just blocked me! I don't think I can feel my ass! YourCousin +Real Madrid Kit But let me just say this, Real Madrid isnt the only ones that have excesive detail in the kits if your gonna change it might as well change the Barcelona one too +REDIRECT Talk:ShaneGujrat Newspaper Pakistan +has got some sand trapped in his vagina and it's making him a little bit cranky +blocked me accusing me for trolling. If he, you and others believe I’m a troll please keep blocking. If Hillary Clinton is a troll then I’m more than happy to be a troll too. If Hillary Clinton is not a troll then I’m not a troll too. If you believe I’m not a troll please first unblock and then block again for the right reasons. After that we would have a base for an evaluation based on the right accusations. Till then my defend line is what Hillary Clinton said “I would like to offer a historic perspective and not to compare Putin with Hitler”. Thanks. +"Contents of the library (objects and functions to be used outside, situation late August 2004) Classes: Page: A MediaWiki page __init__ Page(Site, Title) - the page with title Title on wikimedia site Site title The name of the page, in a form suitable for an interwiki link urlname The name of the page, in a form suitable for a URL titleWithoutNamespace The name of the page, with the namespace part removed section The section of the page (the part of the name after '#') sectionFreeTitle The name without the section part aslink The name of the page in the form Title or lang:Title site The wiki this page is in encoding The encoding of the page isAutoTitle If the title is a well known, auto-translatable title autoFormat Returns (dictName, value), where value can be a year, date, etc., and dictName is 'YearBC', 'December', etc. isCategory True if the page is a category, false otherwise isImage True if the page is an image, false otherwise get (*) The text of the page exists (*) True if the page actually exists, false otherwise isRedirectPage (*) True if the page is a redirect, false otherwise isEmpty (*) True if the page has 4 characters or less content, not counting interwiki and category links botMayEdit (*) True if bot is allowed to edit page interwiki (*) The interwiki links from the page (list of Pages) categories (*) The categories the page is in (list of Pages) linkedPages (*) The normal pages linked from the page (list of Pages) imagelinks (*) The pictures on the page (list of ImagePages) templates (*) All templates referenced on the page (list of strings) getRedirectTarget (*) The page the page redirects to isDisambig (*) True if the page is a disambiguation page getReferences List of pages linking to the page namespace The namespace in which the page is permalink (*) The url of the permalink of the current version move Move the page to another title put(newtext) Saves the page put_async(newtext) Queues the page to be saved asynchronously delete Deletes the page (requires being logged in) (*) This loads the page if it has not been loaded before; permalink might even reload it if it has been loaded before Site: a MediaWiki site messages There are new messages on the site forceLogin() Does not continue until the user has logged in to the site getUrl() Retrieve an URL from the site mediawiki_message(key): Retrieve the text of the MediaWiki message with the key ""key"" has_mediawiki_message(key) True if this site defines a MediaWiki message with the key ""key"" Special pages: Dynamic pages: allpages(): Special:Allpages newpages(): Special:Newpages longpages(): Special:Longpages shortpages(): Special:Shortpages categories(): Special:Categories Cached pages: deadendpages(): Special:Deadendpages ancientpages(): Special:Ancientpages lonelypages(): Special:Lonelypages uncategorizedcategories(): Special:Uncategorizedcategories uncategorizedpages(): Special:Uncategorizedpages unusedcategories(): Special:Unusuedcategories Other functions: getall(): Load pages via Special:Export setAction(text): Use 'text' instead of ""Wikipedia python library"" in editsummaries handleArgs(): Checks whether text is an argument defined on wikipedia.py (these are -family, -lang, -log and others) translate(xx, dict): dict is a dictionary, giving text depending on language, xx is a language. Returns the text in the most applicable language for the xx: wiki setUserAgent(text): Sets the string being passed to the HTTP server as the User-agent: header. Defaults to 'Pywikipediabot/1.0'. output(text): Prints the text 'text' in the encoding of the user's console.NEWL +But you will need to search for reliable sources,too +Nietzsche's Last Man Was Nietzsche's concept of the Last Man explicitly implied in the title? The article makes no mention of it per se, though it sounds implied, so I added a link at the end. +New Section at WP:ANI There is now a New Section at WP:ANI to post any further complaints on this matter. I am sure you'll all agree this is a serious matter and that Marek69 is being stubborn and ignorant by just ignoring it. Please rally together and Rise up. We can change this thing 92.27.228.98 +" So you not going tell me why you created so many accounts? Well, they say online privacy is hot these days. To start with the premise that the subject of article is strictly ancient history is to assume an answer. When I add information about the holiday, various editors ""thank"" me. So I am not only one who thinks it should be mentioned. Perhaps others are afraid of you, or just exhausted by your constant bickering. " +Kings Norton Shouldn't this article be part of the Kings Norton Wikipedia page? Hawkesley is part of Kings Norton after all. +Ringmail I don't know if he regards himself as an expert, I've sweated enough to know for sure that a broigne is not a victorian mistake, and to find citable sources for it. I understand that the English language wor;ld lacks proper history on the subject, but from a continental point of view, there's no mistake possible that ringmail is different from chainmail and was used in the period between the fall of Rome and the comeback of chainmail in the late 1100s. Also, the high handed way in which he remade all the article with no regard for the effots of those who came before him, and without even setting up an account for people to discuss the matter with him wxas, to my view, qualification for vandalism. I'm quite willing to include the bit about representations making it difficult to differenciate between chainmail and ringmail, and the possibility of misconceptions in the 1800s, but the basic matter as established with my collaboration stands, even if it has to be edited further. +Yeah, this guys deleting potentially life saving information citing that the article 'doesn't look very pretty with real information', I call him a nerd and have a go at him for doing so, and I'm in the wrong. Nice to see your a human being mate. Remind me to steer clear of 'people' like you.124.176.226.45 +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did again to Kernodle Middle, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +Adam Reid page How can we improve this article to meet proper Wiki criteria? +emo my eye, ive been wearing sambas since i was 4(ive had the same pair for about 7 years) and ive never seen a emo kid wearing them. besides, this is all original research, so come up with some sources or i will be removing that emo stuff.74.192.12.135 +Damiano photo Hi William Chase, I don't think it's appropriate or necessary to have your name incorporated into the caption (yes, I saw the photo's page), and I think that having it copyrighted and credited to you on that page is sufficient. Fair? It's just too inconsistent with all the other photos on Wikipedia. +" BWilkins, whatever the situation and theory, we cannot know what Stolyarov intended to do. '''''' What did I do this time? " +Brahmins are said to be link between Human and God, also the lead discusses about military pursuits of brahmins. It has no mention about the wandering of Brahmins for alm, which was their profession. Its been said Bhiksha is the only asset of brahmins. You wont have any problem with this glorification, but will poke your nose in matters relating to Ahirs. I am sorry to say you are casteist. +u1|rationale=I no longer wish to be a part of this community. }} +Support per sources, commonname & alphabetical order. +"Welcome! Hello, , to Wikipedia! I'm , one of the thousands of editors at Wikipedia - I am also an Administrator. I hope you like the place and decide to stay; here are some helpful links for newcomers:   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help pages   Tutorial   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Fun stuff... You will get more from the site if you spend a few moments reading the above - I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions! Also tell the community a little about yourself on your User page - again, welcome to the Wiki! (Whisper...)" +this might be a better article if someone proceeds to discuss what the book entails +What page was spammed by this user? I don't see any edits or contributions made at all by anyone with this username. +For the record, I was serious about running in the RFA. I was not trolling or disrupting, I was advised that I should run in the RFA to see how it was like, and I did so. There should have been more questions during the RFA if there was any questions about sincerity. The RFA was not a joke, it was serious. I feel I should have been made an Admin and then would have been the better example. I felt that there was a possibility for confirmation and this should serve as example for other users to be afraid of self nominations to the RFA, even when there is clearly a poll support for running in the RFA. As I am truely afraid, shocked and dismayed at the admins response. As it seems now there is a new rule, if the admin feel you are faking your RFA, they can block you with zero assumptions of good faith. +Hispanics have mixed with many races. They have blond, red heads, blue eyed - you name it. See Raquel Welch who has spoken on Spanish TV about being proud to be of Hispanic descent. It does not how Hispanic any person has in them for someone else to make that determination. To continue the discussion here is not the proper place. Please do it on her talkpage. +Per the citations in the article, drumming is particularly significant in the subject's life; highlighting that is useful; specific link of drumming appropriately highlights drumming. In the absence of an objection from a regular editor of this article, I think there's no reason not to leave the link be.- +" Obsidian Forum Community +" And, as a show of good faith, I've actually updated the bio, tidied it up a bit, etc. It definitely is our mission to have articles on notable individuals, and this article undoubtedly falls within that scope. Your contributions so far are appreciated. t/c " +":Thank you for responding, although you changed your vote from conditional support last time to oppose. As your opposition appears to come from the five (5) ""Political divisions"", please note that I've identified a source (the only such source) that combines everything under ""Administrative divisions"". Given that actual source, I will concede the point in exchange for your vote. As past experience shows regarding Conradi, I don't expect this will help. " +", 10 October 2013 (UTC) This is a non-trivial problem. Many perhaps most of the 5,000 editors with the highest edit count are likely to have diverse editing habits, I can think of two FA writers in that group, one who also has an awful lot of categorisation edits, another spends a lot of time on AWB. Any analysis of those 5,000 would need to work out the proportion of their edits that were of various types. Then there is the issue that you are not likely to have access to their deleted edits, and that a few of those editors have opted out of being analysed. But most importantly, the 5,000 accounts with the highest ever edit counts are not going to fully overlap with the currently most active 3,156. ''SpielChequers'' 12:48" +" June 2010 Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Frances Farmer. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You said ""You clearly have psychological issues."" This is an entirely unacceptable comment that crosses the boundaries of incivility into rude, inappropriate personal attacks. Such conduct is not acceptable on this site. Retract your statement or go to AN/I. " +" Thanks... ...for catching this one. Keep up the good work. '''rolls''' " +". I have a good knowledge of Spanish and am also using my advanced spanish dictionary to help. ""Gentilicio"" doesn't translate on the web and using my dictionary is clearly refers to demonym" +" Let me see if I've got this straight... At around 4 o'clock this morning (an hour when sane people are in bed), you decided to revert a number of my changes for absolutely no reason at all. Then your buddy ""Sergecross"" threatened me with a badly-spelled screed pointing out what a naughty boy I am. OK, I think I see what's going on here. By your Wiki-stalking and provocation, you hope to get me angry and call you names (which, as well all know, is the Worst. Crime. Ever. around here.) Then Sergecross rolls out his fainting couch and proceeds to ban me for most of the remaining millenium. Justice is done, and there is much rejoicing. Tell ya what, friend. From now on, you can change any of my edits or, indeed, anybody's edits into anything you want. Translate them into Serbo-Croatian, substitute ""Sam the Chowderhead"" for ""George W. Bush"", change the ""World Football League"" article into a Marxist treatise that asserts George Washington and Dick Clark were gay lovers, anything. It's Christmas, and I shall be charitable. You're welcome. " +" You're quite welcome. Glad I could help. " +" Hey! The draft is properly laid out which is good, we got inline citations and most promotional content have been removed. However the draft needs more reliable sources linking towards the subject. By reviewing the sources, many of them do not mention Language Technology Centre. So finding sources which provide significant coverage on the subject is ideal. Best, GT " +I just have deleted Russian salad myself. Further discussion is welcomed here or on the article's talk page. +Jung And Einstein In 1895 Albert Einstein was a pupil at cantonal school in Aarau, Switzerland. In 1896, after school in Switzerland, Einstein renounced his German citizenship. Carl P. Jung was born in in the Swiss canton (or county) of Thurgau. While Jung worked on Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (Psychology of the Unconscious), tensions grew between Freud and Jung. Frank P. Geyer continued to serve as a detective until August 15, 1903 when he resigned. He had been transferred to the 18th Police District in the United States. Detective Geyer had arrested James Anderson; whether this is the same Anderson mentioned in Detective Geyer's 1896 work is non-determinable. In 1912 tensions between the two psychologists came to a peak. In 1901-02 Albert Einstein acquired Swiss citizenship and completed a scientific paper, obtaining a teaching position at school in Schaffhausen, Switzerland. The FBI file on Einstein came to light in 1983 when Robert Alan Schwartz wrote an article on the subject for The Nation magazine. Between J. Edgar Hoover and John Hutchison, democratic rights didn’t stop with McCarthy’s downfall nor with the demise of so-called notorious J. Edgar Hoover. Yet for years, zero-point energy according to Hutchison is obtained from the quantum vacuum. Hutchison claims on scientific phenomena are regularly featured and discussed by various media coverage. John Hutchison's claims of inventions and discoveries of a variety of phenomena are, like, NASA. The FBI should do an article on NASA and their non-determinable webers. I do not find it too surprising Schwartz once more wrote about not only Frank Geyer, but Albert Einstein with not too much said about Carl P. Jung during these years around the turn of the centennial. +" Msa Garratts Hi, The idea about an article is a good one, but unfortunately you've started out with an error. That is understandable as the subject is complex. The WAGR first imported the M class Garratts, in 1911. These are very important locos, because they are the third class of Garratt to be built, and the first ""main line"" Garratt, showing the potential as a heavy freight hauler. They were followed up in 1912 by the Ms class, only difference being the Ms class were superheated. So they were also the first class of Garratts to be the subject of a repeat order. Both classes were built by Beyer-Peacock. The Msa class were constructed in 1930 by the WAGR in their own workshops. Apparently a copy of the Ms class, they did seem to have some cosmetic differences. The story does not end there, but moves to Victoria. The VR G class apparently is copied from the Ms class, the major difference is the frames moved outside so as to accomidate the reduced gauge. Outside framed Garratts are very rare, even in the smaller gauges. But wait there is more (no, not steak knives!). The design was used again, for the Australian Portland Cement's 3'6"" line near Geelong, the first loco being supplied in 1936 and the second in 1939. The boiler from one of these locos is used on the restored G42. So in conclusion the design was constructed over a period of 28 years, used on three railway, on two gauges and built by two manufacturers, with, if I've added it up correctly, 27 locos constructed. Personally I think the article should cover the history of the design, and include all the varients. Some work would be required to hunt down variations, though. So yes, I think it does deserve an article. Please feel free to use the above if you wish. Cheers, Michael." +Anyone else remember Dime talking about Blues Saraceno as a major influence? Abbott mentioned this in a Guitar for the Practicing Musician article circa 1995. It seems like this should be included in musical influencesDime wore a plaid patch tattoo in honor of the guy. +" Note that this was not disruption but was a genuine vote. A separate account was created for this, as the proposer seemed to have done the same. It was a little joke, you see. " +" resentment ""In France, the perceived preference of the British Navy for evacuating British forces at the expense of the French led to some bitter resentment"" are you sure about that? the article states the BBC said they have waited until the very last man, so it means everyone was rescued. the French article states the French resentment vis-à-vis the BEF came from Gort's refusal to launch a ""traditional counter-attack"" as planned by French commander General Weygand. Gort wanted an evac as he claimed it was inevitable in the medium-term. the british chief of staff supported Gort and the british operation was launched instead of the french plan. " +" User:Metalvayne and blocking/topic ban Hi Berean Hunter. A week ago, you blocked msg me " +" I second this. If you have sources which talk about the importance of Konigsberg to Old Prussians and Masurians (the stuff on Lithuanians can be combined with the stuff on the Poles - and I already proposed changing the name of the section to ""Poles and Lithuanians in Konigsberg"") then please add them and I'll try to help with that myself. " +" Hmmm... that's exactly what pedophiles do; use the Internet to communicate in order to obtain a ""great deal of pleasure."" " +IGNORANT FOOL...YOU'VE NEVER EVEN SEEN A MAP OF KRASNOI You are so stupid and ignorant that you don’t even know which roads lead into or out of Krasnoi. The road leading west out of Krasnoi was never blocked by the Russians…it was threatened by Tormasov’s enveloping movement but never actually blocked. Your ignorance is disgusting…absolutely sickening... Dumb freshman with low SAT's...that's what you are... kenmore +. Please read my reply +this track listing is NOT from this films soundtrack +" Northern Lights something.... Your names to long. It's exactly that kind of unthinking response - ""oh don't attack other editors"". How then is someone supposed to call a liar a liar? If you check up on Jehochman you will find that it was demonstrated that he deliberately lied with the intention of misleading. Yet he is still here. Check that one, I'll show you the lies of the others." +"Maybe if several users report the same person, the administrators then understand the severity of the user's vandalism...  Msg me  My contribs  " +, 27 April 2006 (UTC) The Game is an abstract mental game, the objective of which is to forget its existence. There is no point in calling The Game a meme, the majority of stuff on Wikipedia is a meme. A meme is simply any idea or concept. I think what this refers to is a common misconception of the word meme, basically meaning a fad. The Game has some interesting memetic properties, but these should be described elsewhere in the article if anywhere. Whoever wants the meme version up should read the meme article first. 11:04 +any longer, I'm sure both editors here will come to some sort of compromise ) +" talkback from 78.26 part2 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) " +Image copyright problem with Image:23rd February 2008 3.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:23rd February 2008 3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ()(Talk) +Yeah, the only problem is that there aren't that many people involved in the discussion and you-know-who has stayed silent for the last few days thus ensuring there is no discussion to speak of. I know where to ask, I'm just unsure how to demonstrate that we're ready. +Nandesuka, you asked for it, you can certify it: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Use_of_administrator_privileges +That could be an option, but I dont' see why that would be needed since they have stated an official motive of their organisation, which is equal righst for Sunnis, while stressing many times that they are not seperatist. Just because of some wiki editor not wanting that to be put into the article (for some reason) doesn't mean people should be deprived of sourced information. +Not just church I think there should be something about the whole village, not just the church. +Deletion of AV News page Just curious why the AV News page is being deleted while its primary competitor Antelope Valley Press is allowed to have its page here unmolested. Granted we have only been in business for six years but we are every bit as a legitimate news organization as AV Press and even more so than AV Town Crier, whose page is also allowed to be here I note. Here is the content: The AV News began as a weekly print newspaper with emphasis on local news located in Lancaster, California USA. It was the second largest circulating newspaper in the area after it began publishing in 2006. In 2008, the AV News added a website and in March 2010, much like the Seatte Post-Intelligencer, the AV News transitioned to a web-only publication. The AV News covers the Antelope Valley area of Los Angeles County - mainly the Palmdale/Lancaster Urbanized Area (a US Census Bureau defined term) and areas of north Los Angeles and southeastern Kern counties, including Acton, Agua Dulce, Edwards AFB, Lake Los Angeles, Mojave, Quartz Hill, Rosamond and Santa Clarita. The newspaper is conservative in its political stance. It is currently the official news publication of the Lancaster JetHawks, a minor league baseball team in Lancaster. History The AV News was founded by Fran Paolinelli in 2006. She continues to work at the publication today. It began as a weekly print publication before dropping its print version to become a web only publication at www.avnewsday.com The paper, conservative leaning, holds strongly held views, which can become controversial at times. Competitors in its market are the Daily News, Antelope Valley Press and the Los Angeles Times. External links AV News Official Website The format is the same as the AV Press. There is less historical info that the AV Press because we have only been going for six years and they've been up for decades. But still, we are getting e-mails from people who use Wiki to find out about the Lancaster/Palmdale area and are surprised to find out that there are more newspapers in the area than what they find listed. I also point out that the City of Lancaster is a major advertiser with us as is the local professional baseball team. Please info me as to what more I need to include so that our page will be left on site or restore the page. +All the references state the plane hit turbulence, as wikipedia is built apon references, that is what I put, I have no affiliation with Continental, and it seems you do! TURBULENCE IS THE REASON as witnesses on the plane describe aswell as the pilot! So make any accusations you want but for now, turbulence is the main reason and factor of the flight. Now just remember, FOLLOW THE RULES AND stop saying major news broadcasters like CNN and BBC are false because you 'seem to think you are right'! +Al Arbour Hey Fucktard. Al Arbour died on Friday. Try having someone read an obituary to you +"I fixed my AFD mistakes... rolled it all back. That's a handy tool, everyone should have it. ;) Haha. Ugh, but yea. Avoided some shit there. Good times. This is why I avoid AFD. Not really, but you know what I'm sayin'. I'll try closing properly later... maybe. Haha. ''''''Love " +I took a look at his edits, and he's been back since the 4th. So far only two of his edits have been about the adult scene: the Jenna Jameson article, and the Joey Yale article. The first you knew about, the second was his classic link removal job and had already been reverted. All his other edits have been to sundry athlete articles, where he seems to be adding details about their high school years which is okay by my book... +Its not quite like that - ISIL adopted an existing flag in use by others and then got famous. +Isn't there a rule at Wikipedia against personal attacks? Or does Sanchez have a special exemption? He's been warned time after time after time after time, but keeps doing it. Why does Wikipedia give Sanchez special treatment? +Dude, who fears banning. This is what U HINDU terrorists are perfect at. This is the 1st personal attack I am making on u.U have till now banned International Human rights orgs in J&K;,Punjab,North East....etc.banning is the only thing of ur expertise. I know u r a stooge of RSS/SHIV SENA/Bajrang Dal ...yuck names ......that is Hindu terrorist orgs. Now I am 100 percent sure......u r one of those killers of Chittisinghpura.....U r a terrorist ( i wont call u a Hindu terrorist coz I dont want to defame Hindus as such) Waiting for Ban:) +" blue ribbon schools OK, thanks for letting me know. I wasn't aware of that. It's not as if there are only a few of them, there are quite a lot, but the school notability requirements are far too low for my tastes. I won't revert, though. ) talk " +yep, considering it had no support for MMS before. +anti-israel comments are not ANTI SEMETIC ahh another zionist coming to save the propaganda! im not an antisemite, nor have i said anything of the sort, prove to me where i said anything against JEWS. Zionism is not a race, or religion, it is as fanatic as radical ISLAM. and do not threaten me, as it is not allowed86.139.179.254 +" Fix it yourself instead of just saying ""someone needs to ....""" +" ""In an interview, Selena said was intimidated by"" shouldn't it be ""she said""? " +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | Talk to Madeline +We should not have religious beliefs, evolution or creationist beliefs brought into wikipedia on edits. We need a nice neautral position not in favour of any of them, sticking to objective data and not subjective viewpoints. The user in dicussion here deals with subjectivity only, anything which opposes his own faith - is deleted, reverted etc. I can not bring this up anymore this is all he does on wikipedia confirmed by his history. The user in question is your best friend fair play. If there was a conscience at play here someone would do something about it, but nobody else is looking into this except yourself, so you will obviously win this by position of authority winning as i could easily obtain a ban, this place is not neutral, i will stay inactive for a year and come back later when things are more fair on here. +It would be fine, but you are refusing to allow obvious content, and lets face it, you would refuse to allow it (esp. in the lead) even if sources were provided. I notice that you are a skeptic, and probably atheist, so are pushing an opinion, and if I am vandalising, you are doing exactly the same, just pushing the opposite opinion +Oh that great repository of Free Cultural Works. There's an example of where the wisdom of the crowd slides downhill when the crowd consists of mainly nerdy young men. °Talk +(UTC) Really it's not. I'm Australian, don't regard myself as a PC-pusher but I'd think Uluru has moved ahead of Ayer's Rock as the preferred name by most people. Certainly when I was younger (in the 1980s) it was pretty much unheard of to say Uluru and anything other than Ayers Rick made you look like some sort of lefty nutter but in the last 10 years or so it's changed. Oh and using Qantas as an example is probably not ideal - the airport they fly to is called Ayers Rock so it's understandable they'd prefer that name. Anyway just my 2c... 05:02, 18 June 2014 +There is a fine picture here. I don't know about copyright . http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/13/brooke-astor-is-dead-at-105/ +I got a warning and a ban for mentioning it. The term they used was 'personal insult.' +have sex with our users like areaseven +recent edit on gurjar mr sitush please stop doing vandalism on gurjars. gurjars are pak 2nd largest ethnic group of pakistan +" As the reference you are using: http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/87642.pdf (page 8) names teh country as Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia it is more accurate to use this name. Also using teh term of just ""Macedonia"" may please the Christian population of teh country but is still not recognised by E.U, the subject of this article, and also might lead to the dissambiguation site of the MAcedonian region. Lest use the sources and reference acurately " +" Speedy deletion of SupportSpace A tag has been placed on SupportSpace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +Never mind. It's already happening. Oh well. +Yes, this confirms that I agree to refrain completely from editing Female genital mutilation and related pages for six months. Thank you for your peacekeeping efforts and TIA for the unblock.(t•c) +Ultimately, I think the PerthWellington article should simply be removed, and redirect here (and that the Perth—Middlesex article should be brought up to date). +Always Do Well To Stop A Citizen's Arrest? Hey, I absolutely refuse to edit articles. I've left that duty to my betters. Why don't you try to fix the problems that hamper good reading out of Wikipedia? I come here often to learn something new. I don't like being jerked around by anybody, whether those guilty of breaking all the rules, or you who wants to ignore it and shove a boot up my ass for complaining! 24.255.11.149 +You might try to deflate your ego a bit and stop making blanket generalizations. The IP I use is a proxy for a university of 20,000 people, plenty of other editors (yes, Macedonians too) who use it. Sometimes I just don't notice I was logged out. Does that satisfy your sensibilities? I haven't called anyone peasant or fuck off, that is your overactive imagination playing tricks on you again. As for the statement, I am simply presenting the fact that it is much more informative and encyclopedic to say the 'Macedonian National Liberation Army' liberated the city, as they were the only 'communist partisans' operating in Macedonia at that time, which you could have realized yourself by reading the article on MNLA. +Ossory citations And that's how Wiki works. Citations, not long rants. +" Support Just because we can disambiguate by capitalization doesn't mean we should. I suspect most readers who type in ""Top Hat"" expect to read about a hat, not a film. " +" Anyone have any thoughts on the addition of Bernard Lonergan to the list of notable metaphysicians? Since Augustine, Aquinas are listed and Lonergan is clearly in this trajectory of Catholic philosophers, I thought he would be a good addition to the list. His work is well-regarded in 20th century philosophy, he certainly has the credentials, and I think many would agree he made highly significant contributions to metaphysics by extending the core ideas of Aristotle, Augustine and Aquinas forward in the areas of cognitional theory, epistemology and verifiable metaphysics based on the ""data of consciousness"" and his study of methodology in mathematics and empirical science. see Insight: A study of Human Understanding. There are Lonergan Centers at Boston College, University of Toronto, Seton Hall, and Loyola Marymount University devoted to studying and extending his works in philosophy and theology. I'm quite sure nearly every philosophy professor at any Jesuit schools would consider his work ""notable"". My attempt at this addition was reverted as ""not particularly notable as a metaphysician"" so thought I would throw it out there. " +Damn wiki admins What is it with all these wiki admins and THEM not being able to follow RULES and policies such as the NPOV, 3RR and rules pertaining for VANDALISM. if anyone knows how i can get in touch directly with SENIOR Admins i would greatly appreciate it as some admins just make their owns rules up on the spot while disobeying wikipedias rules and effectivly slamming banhammers and no, im not talking about all admins, but i am talking about quite a few admins! +Université Lille Nord de France I want to redirect this page to Lille University Northern France. How can this be easily done? Sincerely, +u aint got no pancake mix lady so stopppp +" It seems edit-warring is back Long time no see. Unfortunetly, I am here once again to say user ""Ninguém"" is once again edit-warring my edits. Funny, I have been out of Wikipedia for some days (too busy) and while I was out, user ""Ninguém"" almost did not post anything in Wikipedia. Now that I am returning, the user seems to be once again active in Wikipedia. It's incredible how fast he is able to edit an article I have recnetly edited. In a few minutes, he's there posting or reverting something. When I am not posting in Wikipedia, he is not posting too. I think it's clear the other user follows my edits. It's also funny an user who claimed to not to be associate with Wikipedia, who seemed to be leaving the projective, is once again active (only because I am returning). With hundreds of articles in Wikipedia, it seems the other users is only interested in the articles I recently posted. This is really strange. I try to be far from the other user, but it's impossible because he follows me and spends hours a day checking my recent edits. Please, do something aboout. It cannot keep this way. " +Daysleeper STOP Vandalizing FDNY Page +" September 2008 (UTC) Hi Casliber. Sorry for the lack of communication. I was busy with college (started on 2nd), and never really got much time to read the parvans. Those parvans are really lengthy and it will be quite some time before I finish the first. I've decided to refocus my editing to CS articles for the time being. If I need any help, I'll ask you. Cheers! (talk · mail) 02:33, 16" +Also, there isn't any proof that NASA or the Navy SEALs have ever used his knives or been trained by him (why would they want to be trained by some know-nothing guy with no combat experience?) +"Hello everyone, this is my page and it's a shared IP address so be careful who you leave messages for! An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:River.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Kenny Rogers & Dottie West photo Yeah that's fine, it sounds okay to me. Thanks thanks.. its fine with me if you delete , that's a duplicate one! thnk u very much User:Josenian Bot question Would you be interested in developing a bot like this? On Staeckerbot you have the duplicate function that may be needed for this bot to. tast Sorry, I'm a bit busy these days and it seems a bit complicated for my schedule. Thanks for thinking of me, though. No need to be sorry. tast Thanks... ...for reverting Image:Wpixcw11-1.jpg back from the previous incorrect logo uploaded by . I had tried, but how did you do it? On the image description page, in the File History section, each version should have a little (rev) link, which you click to revert to that version. Orphaned non-free image (Image:HipHopYoda.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:HipHopYoda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Deletion of Will Ferrell image? Why did you delete Image:Will-talladega-uk-premiere.jpg? I have been in discussions with Pd THOR and I thought we had come to a conclusion about the copyright attribution issues. Can you shed some light, please? Sorry- I didn't know you were discussing it- should've checked the incoming links more carefully. I commented at Non-free use disputed for Image:AnEncyclopediaofClaims.jpg This file may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:AnEncyclopediaofClaims.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ""fair use"" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify +" I agree with the changing to ""euphemism"" By no means are these metaphors. Also, 1/2 of these are made up, guys." +" Remove the lists of stations, no one is looking for a list of train stations in Canada. There's Category:Rapid transit stations in Canada if you really want one. According to the article, rapid transit is a subway. This article should only mention the three rapid transit systems in Canada, and have a summary of each, similar to Light rail in Canada. Also, is ""rapid transit"" the preferred name in Canada, or do we borrow the American name ""subway""? Since I've never lived in one of these three cities, I don't know. " +" ""Uncle Sam"" poster Is the poster influenced more by Uncle Sam, or by the original featuring Lord Kitchener? " +Please do not make changes with no explanations. This page has been recently updated. +" Thank you! That recovers a lot of work I did sorting the lists, etc. WP is full of lists which have nothing for sources but the Wikis they are lists OF: as in list of birds, list of trees, etc. So what's the big problem here? From the way somebody's trying to speedy-d this thing, and you'd think it was full of a bunch of peoples' home addresses or SSNs! What is the big rush, please? There's quite time enough to put a {fact} tag on entries people are suspicious off, or click on the link to see the person wearing a bowler hat, and what more do you want? Somebody on the deletion page really doesn't understand the point of list-articles, do they? " +Volunteer Marek is a well known POV pusher/edit warrior who has been involved in outed Russophobic cabals in the past and was blocked for a long period of time from editing eastern europe related articles. I don't understand why he's even allowed to edit these articles when he so clearly has not changed his habits. +That is in general my feeling, however I try to practice WP:FAITH.. but that can only go on for so long. Talk +I'd also like to add that you have potential as an editor. Hence why I'm so responsive to you on your talk page and all. I understand the concerns that you've raised, and I think we're just making bold edits because we know what we're doing (or more appropriately, we like to think that). You're going to run into editors of various philosophies; mine is obviously be-anal-about-citing, which has worked out for me so far. — (talk • contrib • review) - +Translation I was hoping that some people who frequent this page might actually speak Hebrew. Can anyone, perhaps, provide a transation or at least transliteration for the term גיס חמישי (I hope I copied that right) on Fifth column? +just aying thanks for your input on the Baritone guitar page. that was quitehelpful. ) +" The Pinkprint It would be appreciated if you looked over and voted on the move request for The Pink Print to the The Pinkprint. Up to this point there hasn't been a direct response as to which spelling was correct. Nicki Minaj herself clarified the question directly stating it was written, ""The Pinkprint"", (https://twitter.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/497117375712329728). Leave either your support or opposition for the move here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Pink_Print#Requested_move_06_August_2014. Thank you for your time, ." +OHHHHHH THIS IS THE NEW STUFF!!!!!!!! OHHHHH!!! please phone me, (410) 439-7695 ok??!!! ) i love ur wikikikipedia werk can u tell me how o ud o??/ it ??????? ok. pls dont deleat this again ia m want to know what u r say about me pls!!!! ok????? i luv u and everything, so it is, so it is ok????? ) yes. cookys +B_Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering Jeez man, give me a few minutes before you nuke the page Lolz. I'm in the middle of building B_Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering. We had 5 articles redlinking it, all trying to use different spellings. I unified those links. I saw another half dozen articles mentioning it, that could be linking it. I decided to pull over the Russian copy of the article. How about you pull off the deletion tag and check back in an hour or two? +"This is the current Smackdown song as of October...... does anyone know the name of it шшє ₣дN ӧ9 im pretty sure its Jet Black Stare- On The Floor http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2urIbuHimok&feature;=related " +" Reply Oh, not half as interesting as it sounds.:O) ·(t) " +" I disagree. Slang should only be used in direct quotes. And even though this could be a direct quote, the rest of the plot summary isn't (and shouldn't be). So the word ""kiss"" is better. Incidentally, if this is about Victoire, it isn't important enough to be in the summary to begin with, but as per the section above this one, it'll be futile trying to remove it now. (talk • contribs • count) " +" I...Butter is ""a butter substitute"" The references given (see discussion on this above) on this are improperly given. What is given appears to be little more than a google screen scrape. I managed to find both references and they do not support this usage. The use in these publications is not to define but to indicate the broad category. Peanut butter (if placed in the category of a 'nut butter') is also in the category if 'butter substitute' but it is not a type of margarine, which is what this product is. Possibly it might be helpful to say that the product is commonly used to substitute butter but it doesn't help in the basic definiton. " +Big cleanup needed Obviously, this article needs a bit of work. As I see it, we need two things: sections within the list, and inclusion criteria. On sectioning, I believe that we would do well initially in making two sections: Proposed systems, and systems that actually made it to production. On inclusion criteria, I recommend that we limit it to launch systems that have articles. Some proposed launch systems simply aren't notable. So they don't get included here. So there you go, I suppose. (Talk) +" Dr. Robotnik Why is Dr. Robotnik sometimes called ""Eggman""?" +" Hmmm...is that a roundabout way of saying ""lie""? Whatever.... -BC aka " +" But Stranger Danger is so fun (. Good luck again!<3 TALK!! " +" I can see where you would find it personally upsetting, yes; but remember what you're dealing with here. This is the internet. No one knows who you are on the internet. If someone walked up to you in a shopping mall, you wouldn't have any clue who they were ten ways from Sunday. So don't take it personally, because WP and the 'net in general are impersonal by definition. I concur with what Mindspillage said above here: it would be a great loss to WP if you left over this nomination. It simply isn't worth it. You're too good of a contributor to give in that easily; I do hope you reconsider. | say something! " +Idiot Blanche Barrow was not hit in the face with glass at Dexfield Park. Where did you get this bullshit? +You might be interested in WP:ANI#Five-year-old deletion discussion reopened. Adler +I saw that you started Category:Romani people and Romanipen in Romania and it looks good. I have in my mind plenty of ideas to expand the articles and make other new, just let's see how I'll manage to get free time for this. +Thanks, Osplace, for checking this out. It's good to get rid of any copyright material. — +" Please consult the article Ball culture, which states ""drag queen, or transgendered"". WP:OR does not cover synthesis by bringing two facts together. As well, the term ""Femme queen"" does not have an article, so the term is currently of dubious usage as it's a neologism, (which WP policy suggests to avoid using). You state a source: ""TGMSMNET"", however neither this page, nor the mainpage refer to such a reference. From the way you talked about it, I linked it to the ""MSTSW"" reference. In the future, if you could, could you please site resources on this page by using this form? [http://example.com http://example.com] That way it shows up like this http://www.example.com, and one can simply click on the resource, rather than search through the article for the reference itself. Your data is backed up there as well. However, we still have issue... how would the CDC consider a post-op MTF living in stealth as anything else but a ""female""... the MTF would obviously not admit to being a transsexual, and in fact engages in no activity any more risky than a ""biological"" female. (I wait for further evidence that TG/TS is caused by biological factors, and thus the term ""biological male/female"" becomes complicated in even research... no one would ever state that a woman with CAIS is ""biologically"" a male...) As well, I understand the point of not using WP as a soap box... however in talk pages, I'm still free to assert the better application and appropriate nature of the term ""people having URAP""... " +" Please take a break I have been reading this snafu. You are doing yourself no favors; please take a break. I just want to work on improving and creating articles etc. Yes, defending myself is a laborious activity, but to hear exaggerations and hypocrisy thrown at me in an effort to demonize me for expulsion ""to protect the encyclopedia"" is hard to stay away from; the overall nature of said activity is WP:BAITing and things like the CfD and the hostile RM closures is AGF/NPA in the extreme; who should 'take a break' is the chorus/cadre whose primary activity on Wikipedia seems to be attacking contributing editors by any specious and POV/AGF rationale available; I know I'm not alone in being attacked and vilified this way; and yes, there's far more productive things to be doing than arguing with people who only want to argue. " +"'m not going to argue with you. The page clearly said that the biography was written by Muze, not NME. If you don't believe me, take a look. Scroll all the way down to the bottom, and you'll see this disclaimer. ""Copyright 1989-2008 Muze UK Ltd. For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved."" Information from Muze is mass-distributed and appears on various websites, including NME. Just because it appears on the website of a reliable source doesn't mean that Muze is reliable. I've repeatedly apologized for my actions, but any stubbornness on my part does not mean that I was the only person who behaved against the rules. You were clearly being stubborn, as you are now, by denying that the biography is from Muze rather than NME. ( ) I" +Thanks for the feedback. As for Insight, numerous sources have claimed it is an industry first. I will be researching further by posting at the Norton and Wilders forums. +" 2010 (UTC) I don't think the definition from Webbs really works given the change that has happened since it was first written (1917) . The idea that professionals ""supply disinterested counsel and service to others, for a direct and definite compensation, wholly apart from expectation of other business gain"" is a bit naive, particularly in the I think a more realistic and up to date defintion is required. For instance, in the light of Holocaust, in which many German professionals acted as instruments of a disfunctional state, which would tend to indicate that ""service for others"" may not be have the intention, but was taken to a tragic extreme. Likewise the recent financial crisis would tend to indicate that profession of banker (if it is a profession) has shown to conducted wholly for business gain (i.e. higher profit, larger bonuses), whilst other professions have shown themselves to be very interested in business gain, often to the detriment to the business (e.g. accountants in the Enron scandal). I am not saying that Perks is the ideal source of information, but would suggest we need to cast around for a better definition, and one that is couched in more modern language. (talk|contribs) 16:44, 1 November" +Tangential and TS There are a few judgement calls there that we will have to do a second pass on. I did include the Bee Bees (see my comment in Bee Gees) in it (Jeb and dubya, that is) and I did not include Jesse Jackson. Those three guys are in too many categories as it is. You want to remove a few from the category? Be my guest, but do not get greedy about undoing my work. +Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - +" Not everyone. ""Reason"" is a notoriously partisan source. " +":::::You resorting to dishonesty is disgusting and vile Binksternet. For starters, dating back to the original discussion back in December 2009, while the user Optigan liked FinancialNorth1, he preferred a cropped version of the fourth photo, to which no including PaulH or you for that matter said anything as clearly noted in the discussion. As i'm saying again for the umpteenth time and as the record showed, no decision was made and the discussion ended. Paulh, or you did not say anything. If he wanted the photo then, why didn't he continue to press his case then and convince a consensus then? I would've left it at that then, but instead he and other editors remained silent. I didn't restart the discussion because I assumed that the editors simply lost interest, or didn't have the time. Furthermore, I did not ""slip in"" as you disgustingly, dishonestly, facetiously say. I only added that photo because I noticed for the time being that no one had made a decision since the original discussion back in January. Again, no one did anything for months. You and Paulh cannot claim you didn't see the change, because you made several other edits throughout the article for months. Again, Paul did not form a consensus prior to the change, or continue the discussion where it had left off. Once again, he instead changed the photo, got a ""consensus"" from Binksternet. The IP editor liked the photo, but, quoting the editor again: ""Any of the photos in that section (""FinancialNorth.jpg""; ""Montgomerystreetsf.jpg""; ""Federal Reserve Band (San Francisco).jpg"") except #2 (SanFranciscoEmbarcadero.jpg) would be fine as a replacement, and even the cropped version of #2 is better than the one currently there now. Thoughts?64.81.57.93 (talk)"" ""I'm going to replace it with ""FinancialNorth.jpg"" and see what happens."" The crux of it was that Paulh made the change before even Binksternet approved it, or I or other editors could respond. Binksternet's abusive little crusade against me shows my point that he and Paul have no interest in perusing collaborative editing efforts. Despite my reverts, I at least agreed to having a discussion and a ""photo choosing contest"" as it were. Paulh did not and Binksternet is now acting as some kind of enforcing. I don't see Binksternet asking the IP editor in question or other editors to the SF article including Optigan13 have their say either in this. He is not apologizing to me and asking that we resume the discussion and consensus, something that at least Paulh did earlier. Only showing his intentions as pure slander towards me as attempt to have me banned purely because he disagrees with my edits or whatever personal victory he may get by flaming me " +" Speedy deletion declined: Castle Age Hello The Blade of the Northern Lights. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Castle Age, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previously declined, please do not re-tag. Use WP:AFD or WP:PROD instead. Thank you. Why " +YAWN!! The above COMMENT is a quote from McNeight!!! AND yet HE still insistes on adding that damn 'preceeding unsigned.....yada...yada' What a RUDE and obnoxious individual. +I caught you vandalizing a page on wikipedia. Normally right now id block you, but you happen to pull this shit while I'm in a transitional period so I don't wanna block you, I wanna help you. You see the path of the righteous wikipedian is beset on allsides by the inequalities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. So basically dont be such a dick and fuck up wikipedia. I worked really hard creating and maintaining this website and many people enjoy my invetnion without causing such harm. But you sir, you are a different animal. I dont think Ive ever caught anyway vandalizing wikipedia before. You sir are a true original. A true renegade. Your so bad ass I cant think straight. Im all bendy and shit and this fervor is giving me the vapors. Please brother, sister or inbetween dont mess up wikipedia. think about the children and do like the cats in my neigborhood do... shit in the sandbox. +I was finishing creating a page and I wanted to know if I had cited the sources correctly. I also wanted to know how to make the page an actual Wikipedia page and know how to change the name of the page. The page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raymond37/Phoebe_Allen%27s_Hummingbird. I tried putting this same question on the teahouse and I got no answer. +i'll hook your mom you motherfucker. yeah suck my balls and slurp my come. bitch. +sleep and wikipedians anybody out here who cant sleep? I have been up all night on wiktionary adn its now0727local time. strange +Calling an edit war an edit war isn't a personal remark. Its a simple statement. +Just checked you history. You are a Kannada right? You don't have any history to write about Kannadigas? You motivated moron targeting and deleting Tamil identities in all possible ways. I don't know how Wikipedia is allowing guys like you to go ahead with clear conflict of interest. I am writing to the highest authority about 5 guys like you playing with gods and history relating to India and Hinduism. Will slipper you if i receive one more notification from you. +" December 2007 You have been blocked quite a while from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. " +If you could look in.... I am considering going live with +Do you pride yourself in your ability to write such poetic and profound statements that mean nothing? Maybe you should take up poetry - you can show off your English skills to the world. +" the argument is that deism (in GW's case) was an informal subdivision of Episcopalian terology, not an organized religion one could ""belong"" to. He claimed membership in and was active in his Ang/Epis church but never said a word about being a deist, never joined a deist group & and never attended any deist ceremonies. " +" I wonder what would be your NPOV version of the following article: Muslims believe that Muhammad was the last Prophet and Messenger of the monotheistic Abrahamic tradition, and that the Quran is the last revelation of God. Muslims also believe that after Quran and Muhammad, there will be no guidance from God. In the Quran, Muhammad is referred to as the ""Seal of the Prophets"" or the ""last Prophet"". Followers of Mani (founder of the Persian faith Manichaeism) believe that these titles (the Seal of the Prophets and the Last Prophet) are attributed to Mani who, his followers claim, came before Muhammad. I've bolded the statements that makes it NPOV. Now tell me how it compromises NPOV. If you are so much concerned with NPOV then why are you reverting to usedbook's version? I have asked him to cite sources of his claim and he didn't do so. " +First, I just realized via your question that I could answer here. (Assuming it saves.) Yes, I finally get that my attacks were totally inappropriate and unneccessary? I confess I did not at first, even this morning. I realize I made inappropriate attacks after looking at his contributions and assuming some highly speculative personal motivation and then asking him about it in an offensive way. I would not be at all surprised if others have made negative assumptions about me based on looking at my contributions history and attacked me, so the user does have my sincere sympathies and apologies. What to do differently when groups go after me? Write a better Wikiquette name several people? Go to WP:ANI naming several people? Do User:RfCs naming several people? That is where I admit I need further advice. Since a 7.5 year old off wiki email is often the focus of harassment, and so far the advice is not to go into detail about it, I don't know how to defend the recurrent references to it. Let me say again, it was a stupid, overly generalized and exaggerated response, but certainly not written with some evil bigoted intent. I feel that a lengthy correction of it complete with refs about then existing specific incidents/issues/etc, or stating in detail my current views, would be inappropriate, even on my user page and doubtless lead to more accusations by people who have a different POV. But if there's some policy on this that I missed, I sure wish people would help me out with that. +do not delete my comment you zionist you are not allowed to delete my comment, so please do not do that! once it is up it is up! i have been warned, so there is no need for deleting it. if you are, then get rid of the warning! i have read the rules. also stoppin trying to spread your propaganda your zionist freak. you might aswell, name this page 'how to make a terrorist state into a briliant state. your propagnadist! get a life86.139.179.254 +re: Collective Punishment Please see my response http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_punishment. Thank you. +" ""Head (geography) or headland, a type of peninsula"". This isn't right. A headland is not a peninsula at all. " +Edited by Daniel Danger Molineux (danALLMIGHT@hotmail.com) +" The Band's legacy, Beggar's Banquet, etc. An anonymous user is repeatedly misreading The Guardian source and insisting on adding a dubious tag to it. Here's the direct quote: The spark for Fairport taking this watershed turn was the Band's 1968 album Music from Big Pink, the record that - along with Bob Dylan and the Band's Basement Tapes bootleg - brought about a widespread musical volte-face, in which what remained of psychedelia was replaced by a new rootsiness. Among the rock aristocracy, its influence was evident in the Beatles' ill-fated back-to-basics project Let It Be, the Rolling Stones' purple patch that began with Beggars Banquet, and Eric Clapton's decision to call time on Cream. The anonymous user takes issue with this statement, claiming that Music from Big Pink could not have influenced Beggar's Banquet because of chronology, i.e., that the Stones were almost done recording the album when Big Pink came out. But, read the statement: it does not say that it influenced the recording of Banquet, but the ""purple patch that began with...,"" etc. This seems clear to me. I would like to hear some other editor's opinions on this matter. -''''''TheFortyFive " +It was a mistake for all 15 cabinet positions, and all 7 cabinet-level positions, from the time they were nominated, until their confirmation by the Senate? Please. +Migit wrestler Why does it have to say that? Why cant it say dwarf or little person? Calling a dwarf a migit is a) rude and b) WRONG (PEOPLE ARENT SUPPOSE TO SAY IT) +Userification of Cooked TV Hello Darkside05, I have userified the article on Cooked TV as requested. Please see (speak to me) . +" I've fixed the De La Salle link - it showed up as a notification for me because the dab page is one I created. But looking at the article raises the much bigger point: a navbox like that should not be part of the text of one article, but should be a template, added to the various appropriate articles. I see you created the navbox, so please sort this out. See WP:NAVBOX. Thanks. D " +" So I hope you will oppose any version of FR that would not have prevented this case, as not being fit for purpose. In just the same way that a retraction will be due from Jimbo if he somehow comes up with a proposal that would not have ""100% prevented"" the Ted Kennedy incident. I hope that you might also realise that if in your words the case here is ""thankfully relatively rare"", why many people would then think that applying a blanket measure such as Flagged Revisions is not very appropriate at all. I contrast it as the British Government contending every citizen must be forced to carry an identity card, on the presumption that is the best way you can catch terrorists, which happen to also be ""thankfully relatively rare"". Why not for example in this specific case take a more intelligent approach, and implement sopmething that prevents or flags any edit that adds the word ""molesting"", instead of forcing onto all BLP articles an incredibly blunt and incredibly bad faith assuming measure? (and any interested observers, please, stop before you say it, these valid concerns with what FR is/could be cannot all just be washed away by referring to the quite irrelevant 'advantage' of FR of opening up the tiny minority of protected articles). And to further address the specific example you give, maybe you can expand on why anybody would be likely to believe that one sentence claim, when it was added to the article along with another 15 sentences, which at best hint at the whole thing being a hoax, and at worst, screams delete me now for being total WP:BOLLOCKS. We can also discuss how an editor in between the vandalism and your removal 'fixes the article for typos' without noticing that it is 90% complete bollocks? Even when one of the typos is a few words away from the molesting red flag. A systemic failure perhaps? And finally, as an admin, perhaps you can tell me why the IP user is not now blocked, irrespective of how long ago the edit occurred. Incidentally, the now famous bad account on Ted Kennedy was also not blocked immmediately after his first edit was a BLP violation on an unrelated article. Another systemic failure? I'm all for criticla analysis of cases 'FR would have prevented', because they frequently pose more questions than they answer, about the whole model of Wikipedia, never mind how we efficiently and intelligently prevent BLP violations. " +" Replaceable fair use Image:UFC30 ortizTito 2.gif Thanks for uploading Image:UFC30 ortizTito 2.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. .718 " +Reason for false info My cousin came to my house and was fucking with my wiki so I'm sorry for any false info on any pages +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | Talk +" Ahem, wtf are u talking about sire? I do not practice ""vandalism""." +Just because you find a source doesn't make it legitimate or encyclopedic. And what about a Spanish-language flag? Are you showing the flag of Spain? Our western hemisphere readers might not like that very well. They went to war with Spain, just like we Americans went to war with the British, to get out from under that flag, as it were. +reverting to last known edit by me. The article was vandalized a few days ago and is now being returned to its original state. Any users wishing to dispute the information should do so here. If sysops examine the network log files, they will discover that the vast majority of referers come from 9/11 Truth sites, and the vast majority of exit links go to 9/11 Truth sites. Therefore, removing that information was damaging wikipedia's reputation. Visitors are depending on wikipedia to cover the work that Jones is currently involved in, which of course includes everything relating to 9/11 that was on that page. Using the CT term to describe 9/11 theories is ad hominem and also not NPOV, and therefore not civil. Anyone endorsing that type of thinking is not NPOV and ask them to not edit the 9/11 pages. As the Zogby poll shows, 42% of America believes the government is covering up 9/11 and 45% want a new investigation including government officials possibly being involved. For now on, any vandalism or ad hominem remarks will be dealt with via official complaints using Wikipedia protocol. Also, even though my ad hominem remarks were direct retaliation, I do apologize for them. Anyone using these types of remarks should not be editing these pages. I expect anyone and everyone to be civil. +| Talk 22:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) +" Osli73 is wrong, yet another time! You stated that this statement is not in reference to the ICTY: ""By seeking to eliminate a part of the Bosnian Muslims, the Bosnian Serb forces committed genocide."" Yet, another time, I am proving you wrong, read here: http://www.un.org/icty/krstic/Appeal/judgement/krs-aj040419e.htm " +" We have a color for ""Altaic"" just as we have a color for other non-genetic groups such as ""Papuan"" and ""American"" in order to keep the number of colors at a manageable level. But most linguists have never been convinced of the validity of ""Altaic"" as a genetic group and the majority of linguistics simply view it as a Sprachbund. I doubt that further research will reveal anything more convincing. The notion of ""Altaic"" has been around for 60-something (or more) years and has failed to convince the majority of historical linguists in that time. It's not like we're dealing with unknown languages and simply lack enough data. ""Altaic"" is likely never to be demonstrated to be a valid genetic grouping. " +I am not a sock puppet i am just good at what I do so dont get confused thanks. Genious of Wikipedia's editing +" @Shmayo I already know the map from John Speed, but this far away from being an evidence that the Suryoye/Suraye called themselves Assyrians or considered the ancient Assyrians as their ancestors. The ""Deutschen"" don't call themselves Germans (Germanen) or Alemanes (Alemannen) in their native tongue and it's not the first time that the word Suryoye/Suraye was mistranslated into ""Assyrian"" by outsiders:missionaries and colonists. Do you have quotes or chronicles from Nestorian Christians BEFORE the 19th century and in their OWN words, which shows an ethnic Assyrian continuity? The Syriac-Orthodox Church has quotes and chronicles which goes hundreds of years back, where they equate Suryoyo with Oromoyo in their OWN words. Interestingly, the Arameans from Maalula who are either Christian Melkites or Muslims call their Aramaic language/dialect also ""Siryon"" or ""Loghtha Siryanoytha(Aramoytha)"", which is a result of Greek-Christian influence on the Arameans. The word Suryoyo, which literally simply means Syrian in English is rather a religious term similar to Maronites, Catholics or Melkites. Nevertheless words can change their meanings in course of history. Even if the word Suryoyo derives from Assyrian ot doesn't change the fact that the Arameans where also known by this name. " +" ""1894...simple transformer substations, directly the electricity from public networks"". Leaving the syntax aside, I am unsighted with regard to public electricity supply networks in 1894, hence the {{cn}} tag. " +I have cleared the trivia section from NA callsigns article. 09:48, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC) +About the syrian civil war map edit the map if it is incorrect but don't delteit,this war don in the libyan civil war article +" Why are you asking here, since you are a member of FilePile? There's an interesting ""discuss"" thread you could ask this in. - " +Marnanel your talking nonsense, there is no dispute in the real world. Money magazine wrote that article after complaints were made is now out dated. Stevensons legal battles have been settled for some time. All the text vary from each other which is reflected on the page. There is no dispute between Powers and myself. Her attorneys were contacted and since then her products have reverted to her particular text only. The problem was these people thought they could cheat me and they got caught. Now they have suffered terrible embarassment over it. The matter has been resolved and I Am Not willing to sacrifice my legacy with the public hog washing these stories. Enough is enough. Money Magazine never interviewed one single author for that story. My legacy does not revolve around Money magazine but my authorship. And if you want to present the Footprints Poem in the Wiki you must show the chronology of the poems history. What is it that you need to present reliable source to this article? Be specific. I removed my published book from world wide marketing is that enough proof of authorship for you. If so then see authorhouse for details or contact me. Thank you Carolyn Joyce Carty +" Well they are used in all the Heart of Midlothian F.C. and Rangers F.C. articles that I edit, and have been used in both cases since before I joined Wikipedia. If you have a problem with them take it up at WP:FOOTY, I will happily remove them if there is a consensus at the project, that they should never be used. Cheers, Scot " +Help Can someone please undo the OR being added by an IP to Almighty Vice Lord Nation? - ✉ +Merge with The Logrus and The Pattern Neither The Logrus nor The Pattern is sufficiently independently notable to justify its own article. As such, these two articles should be merged here. +What exactly did I do wrong? Sorry, but ... all I did was tell the truth. I put reliable sources. I'm getting fed up with people not getting it that the season was not released in the UK. +" Deletion discussion about Shiv Ram Park Hello, Mj.foru, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Ram Park whether the article Shiv Ram Park should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia. The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Shiv Ram Park, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk. Thanks again for your contributions! —>ιν ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης " +" Cherian - has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=) ....Thanks for your kind words and sweet offer. Sorry to dissappoint you...But again..thanks Cherian - Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message." +" Coordinator slot open Due to an unfortunate recent episode in which Eco was indefblocked (and then retired) for real-life harassment, we have a coordinator slot open. See discussion here. Cheers, — (converse) " +" http://www.nida.nih.gov/pdf/monographs/73.pdf#search='testing%20for%20drugs' Pg 95. Dr. Chenar, the Autopsist, had failed to originally do a drug screening. His initial diagnosis of the tumor was that it was an Astrocytoma. He then started preparing the body for the autopsy. No blood or urine specimines were kept. But then this will be considered personal research. I never said ""we....""! Subwayjack" +"Why is there no mention in the article about ""Love Hurts""? It was a big single for the band, but other than it being listed as a single, there is no information about it in the main body of the article. " +" Yes, and I notice some sources call the ""antilopine wallaroo"" a ""antilopine kangaroo"". The wikipedia as it stands has a seperate article on Wallaroos which lists the differences from kangaroos, so I don't think it is really worth changing. My encyclopedia and the wikipedia both seem to use one ""R"" in forester. -(talk) " +Is this what you wanted to show? +" Origin of the (Kutrigur) Huns Roman historians Themistius(317-390), Claudian(370-404), and later Procopius(500-560) called the Huns Massagetae.""The World of the Huns"", Otto Maenchen-Helfen, page 4:""But considering that Themistius, Claudian, and later Procopius called the Huns Massagetae,..."" The Huns were called Massagetae also by Ambrose(340-397), Ausonius(310-394), Synesius(373–414), Zacharias Rhetor(465-535), Belisarius(500-565), Evagrius Scholasticus(6th century) and others. Alexander Cunningham, B.S. Dahiya(1980, 23) and Edgar Knobloch(2001, 15) identify Massagetae with the Great Yuezhi: Da Yuezhi -> Ta-Yue-ti(Great Lunar Race) -> Ta-Gweti -> Massa-Getae. Dahiya wrote about the Massagetae and Thyssagetae ""These Guti people had two divisions, the Ta-Yue-Che and Siao-Yue-Che, exactly corresponding to the Massagetae and Thyssagetae of Herodotus ... "" (Dahiya 1980, 23). Thyssagetae, who are known as the Lesser Getae, correspond with the Xiao Yuezhi, meaning Lesser Yuezhi.SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS, Number 127 October, 2003, page 22-24, http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp127_getes.pdf" +" ACES09? Since the IP editor who keeps clammoring for this item's inclusion seems unwilling to do so, I thought I'd bring this to talk. Does anyone else besides this IP think the ACES09 ""rivalry"" merits inclusion in the article? I just don't think we need to include a blog-based fued between fans of teams who have never even played each other merits inclusion. I understand that it was in some Seattle papers, but lots of things are in lots of papers. I dunno, hopefully we can get some discussion going in lieu of the edit war. .Alpaugh " +tom birchall is bi Bold text +(UTC) I won't delete it. Enough that I've pointed out its flaws. I don't think such a straightforward counting as mine needs representation as a box. I'll just bold the tally. (talk) 08:35, September 10, 2014 +" Unprotections I was wondering what you thought of this idea. I think it would be a good solution to situations like Steve Irwin, so that you can unprotect the article but make sure someone is watching it if you don't have the time or inclination to do it yourself. " +" Thnx for d help, i'm logging in into twitter, if i will give my personal mobile no. to u there, will u call me ri8 now ??  talk " +" Keep kidding yourself. Thats the fanboy site you are using for your third ""reference"". You people are clueless. Goodbye.70.107.178.89 " +Didn't I supply a lot of knowledge about Einstein's name defamation? Where is your knowledge of this subject? You and your friend shall know that Ustashe movement was established in January 1929.72.75.20.29 +Aaron Virdi is also famous for his Youtube videos. He did have a account called Icerastajamin. his account had millions of views on every single video. As it got popular Aaron got popular with rewards of money and fame. A This account was famous but Aaron decided to start a fresh and make a new account.At the moment Aaron is Manager of Erah. Aaron youtube link is available when clicking this link +Yeah If you don't like the team, get the hell out of the stadium. Douche. +More pictures We only have exterior pictures. Surely we can find some more detailed and more interesting pictures? +" Sorry for the language, but it busts my bridges and burns my soul when controlling sysop wannabees like ""MoeRON"" go around removing other people's work. The wiki is so full of junk its unbelievable, compared to all that One More Sat Night is a good page that can get better and there's no reason for him to take off after it. Youre right about Playing, I was wrong there but I'm right about everything else. ~~~~" +" Problematic paragraph The following paragraph is of concern: ""The tactics of some of the more determined ALF activists are anathema to many animal rights advocates, such as Singer, who regard the animal rights movement as something that should occupy the moral high ground, an impossible claim to sustain when others are bombing buildings and risking lives in the name of the same idea."" Should an encyclopedia make the assertion that an argument is ""an impossible claim to sustain""? " +" Good work The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Excellent job with your work on Statewide legislative elections in the United States, 2010. Continue the good work! " +" November 2007 (UTC) It seems that either you do not understand, either you are of bad faith. Let's make it simple: According to Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem, 1972), not I, the great argument of the Reform rabbis in Frankfurt (1843) was ""God ordered circumcision to Abraham, not to Moses""; in other words God's COMMANDMENT to Abraham is circumcision, God's COMMANDMENTS to Moses do not order circumcision; in other words: - God's One Commandment to Abraham = circumcision. - God's Ten Commandments to Moses = not even one for circumcision! The rabbis, not I said so! Therefore, wholly and seriously documented, I wrote it into the main article but WP and S rub it out. This is an insane violation of the wiki rules. Now, in order to enlighten the main article, the 2nd Commandment topic of this ""Discussion"" introduces my ""discovery"" (a child would do it). It says: - God's 2nd Commandment to Moses orders him: ""Do not circumcise."" But, contrary to the saying of PW and S, I never attributed this to the Reform rabbis. Conclusion: who forgot to take their medicine, for several days now? Not I! The ethical question involved about this discussion is: ""How can the wiki support a very obviously childish lie just because this lie has been carried along for millennia?"" Think about it! If you are responsible persons, you cannot publish an obvious lie without warning your readers, which I am doing. Sigi's request to WP and S: ""Circumcise your heart, eyes, ears and pen, not your peco!"" because yes, this criminal violation of Moses 2nd Commandment is being done every day in the USA to baby boys. It even has been done to an Oregon girl, in 1950 (see http://www.aesculapiuspress.com/ - Books – The rape of innocence); indeed a good American mother cannot want her beloved daughter be deprived from circumcision when her beloved son gets it, can she? Friendly your, Sigismond 12:54, 19" +Sick of this STOP DELETING MY PAGE, I JUST CREATED ABOUT ME, FEW WORDS AND YOU DELETED, YOU WANT WAR, WELL AFTER NEW YEAR, WHEN I HAVE MORE TIME YOU WILL GET IT, BLOCK ME IF YOU WANT TO, I WILL REOPEN ACCOUNT, OR CANCEL MY ACCOUNT BETTER YET, BUT DO NOT REMOVE ABOUT ME PAGE BOY, GOT THAT VANDAL, I WAS BEGINNING TO LIKE YOU... +Interesting. Thanks, Skip. +That is clearly not the case, but even if there is, I would just remove that as trivia anyway. lute +Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2015 lamar odom is a vampire +I would like to remind everyone of that Our deletion policy says that if the article provides sufficient context to show that the topic is worthy and that it can be expanded, it should not be deleted! I hope that all will respect this policy. +" Meaning of ""Fitnah"" The meaning of the word Fitnah, as claimed by Scholar Ibn Kathir in his tafsir, is ""Shirk"". and also Muhsin Khan clarifies, ""And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.) (Sura 2:193)ref"" Source: tafsir Ibn kathir (verse 2:193)" +, salt-cured meat, curing (food preservation), smoking (cooking technique) - probably others. Perhaps we don't need any more general articles +see the messageboard for proof! +History of indicators It would be useful to have charts showing changes in key indicators like GDP, growth rate, and unemployment, over several decades. +400px|thumb|The dark side of the force is the key to many abilities some consider to be...unnatural. +You Owe Me An Apology Will you apologize to me? +The Wall Street Journal article today explains, that yes, Bergwall has convictions for earlier crimes, but that the eight murders convictions he was convicted of have been quashed. The article made no mention of the earlier convictions that were less serious offences than murder, and said that Sture Bergvall is a convicted Swedish criminal in the lead. The article is very wordy, and yet unclear. +Charles Sumner article Hello Dr. Jensen. I have recently been making edits on the Charles Sumner article. I have expanded on the Dominican Republic annexation treaty and information on President Grant. Are there any other areas that need work on the CS article? +" No, I will make sure that will be removed permanently. I will not do this for awhile to avoid violations, but hope that someone else will consider and agree. There is no reason whatsoever to put ""the late"" in front of his name, I will list several reasons, and although I think that is somewhat POV, there are other reason as to why I remove the info: Everyone dies sometime - Does it really make sense to have an article about a past event and just put ""the late"" in front of everyone that has died? Poor writing - It's just sloppy/filler writing to put ""the late"" in place. Would you ever see anyone referred to as ""the late"" in a print encyclopedia? Recentism - WP has a guideline/template that we should try not to capitalize too much on recent events and keep them in perspective. Would it make sense 10 years down the road to still refer to him as ""the late""? Let's make things as static as possible. Precedent - At one point, several dozen articles referred to Steve Irwin as ""The late Steve Irwin"", now, this is the only one that does (by doing a search), and there seems to be consensus about that. Knowledge of his death - Let's face it, a vast majority of people (especially those that would look for this article) know he is dead, and the few that may not be sure can click the link. Maybe people don't want to know that he's dead or be reminded of it, and putting that acts as a spoiler. Even Anna Nicole Smith had a few ""the lates"" put on pages of hers, and those have all been removed (a few by me, a few by others). ""Saving a click"" is not a valid reason for this, we should assume that the readers are smart, and things like that can go to the Simple English edition. Irrelevance - Why would the fact that he is dead be relevant to an article that talks about his programming? His shows will probably be reran for many years to come, and the fact that he died somewhat unexpectedly makes no bearing on what he did on his programming. Well, this is my case, I would also like to point out WP:OWN, which I feel has been violated in these reverts. I also am starting a discussion on WP:Words To Avoid to get some word from other editors to make sure that I am doing the right thing. I am supremely confident that I am, and I look forward to improving the PETA article in the future. " +Some friendly and genteel comments from your civility police: “Tread carefully” “Tread carefully” “Have it your way” “Having it his way, lol.”[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DVdm&diff;=558110749&oldid;=558108211} I'll identify all of you by your real names. As you say, tread carefully, and have it your way. +" Yes, the money quote is that I'm fucking pissed off at the insistence of Richard James continually harrassing me, refusing to stop identifying my personal info. (as with posting my personal email above with website). I have vandalized nothing but to take a letter or two off of my personal name and words that lead to my personal info. in the slanderous and libelous and defaming posts of richard james. I don't give a shit that my project is not listed here. I found the whole process interesting and hilarious, though quite hypocritical. WHo can take the piss out of who here. THe article was about an art project, not me. I don't care that it's not there. It doesn't exist, nor does Bigfoot! His compromise was on day two of the original posting of the project article, a one man band who decides fist down who gets what and when, like a fascist pig. I could have campaigned for votes, but what the fuck...Before final vote and deletion, Richard James posted an article about me without my desire nor consent, and then deleted it in a violent fit of rage when I jokingly said the first article is dead at another's insistence that it should be deleted then at seven days. He's had the same hard-on ever since. As I said, I don't give a shit but that his posts are defaming, slanderous, libelous and outright insidious. His high and mighty accusational tone is what is weird and strange. All I have done in the past two days is to delete letters of my name and project, and the old username that I was attempting to expunge. Why? ""Such posting can cause offence or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches. If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and inform people there that the information was posted (but crucially, do not repost it on that page). An admin or developer can then remove the information from the archives of Wikipedia."" ""Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia."" How is it vandalism to attempt to remain anonymous?! and to attempt to separate personal and professional reputation from libelous attacks?" +" I want to see images of this sexy gender gap. of Doom " +To respond generally to the statements made above: It's noteworthy to mention Tillman's religion in light of the controversial statements made by Ralph Kauzlarich, regarding the family's beliefs, and how it relates to the investigation of his death. Additionally (since this is apparently hard to find) the biography by Jon Krakauer refers to Pat Tillman as an agnostic and possibly even an atheist. I'm sure if someone wants to actually read the book, they can find a relevant quote to include. On a more personal note, this entire discussion topic stinks of religious paranoia.129.2.167.219 +Also, could you share with everyone your IP address? That would helpful. I know you want to be honest about your ban, so just come clean right now. +Ok, well maybe Aaron, because I pretty much publicly pwned him, and I suppose this was his attempt to salvage some dignity ... or something. +Banana Hi banana box here's the rear for you!!!!! +YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB +" Response to your recent edit at Loyola Academy Having attended Loyola Academy, I think it's fair to say that the students come from Chicagoland. ""Northern Illinois"" is definitely misleading, as it suggests that students are commuting from places like Rockford and the Quad Cities. They're not. (It's not a boarding school, or anything like that.) To my knowledge, there weren't even any kids from Naperville or Aurora. Chicagoland is sufficiently broad enough. " +" My reply that you have deleted in a fascist manner from the Nicosia Discussion page....l Nicosia and discrimination against Greek contributors and the Greek character of the cityDear Salvio, You have accused me of abusive behaviour against other users and consequently blocked me from editing the article on Nicosia for a 24 hour period. May I draw to your attention that it is fairly obvious that those three users namely Seb az86556 , Seric2 and Chesdovi are clearly constantly creating a picture of Nicosia as a decadent muslim city that serves their religious beliefs and are all clearly hailing form Turkish backgrounds. There is a constant undermining of the city´s Greek identity i.e. whenever a Greek flag appears in any single picture the aforementioned users delete that picture instantaneously and prefer to throw in pictures of the flag of ""shame"" and occupation that is equivalent to a legalisation of a human crime of continuous brutal occupation of the island of Cyprus by the Turkish army. The Greek flag is OMNIPRESENT in the Republic of Cyprus whether some people like it or detest it but this is the reality and an Encyclopedia that wishes to be UNBIASED should depict the REALITY and not the subjective views of a minority of readers that are furthermore based on extremist religious and nationalistic views. On the other hand, such users do find it appropriate to throw in pictures using the Turkish and the ILLEGAL, yes illegal according to United Nation referendums flat of the non-recognised internationally illegal self-proclaimed state of the so-called TRNC. It is totally UNACCEPTABLE to have extremist nationalistic individuals, that strategically reached the level of administrators, deteriorating all the time the article on the city of Nicosia, promoting an unrealistic Turkish character and undermining the Greek character of the city AND at the same time having an ADDITIONAL article on ""North Nicosia"" that is depicting a totally FALSE picture w.r.t the city. The TRNC is illegal, not recognised by any state other than Turkey and some terrorist states that are non-democratic and yet Wikipedia has a page on Northern Nicosia by supposedly administrators that support the unification of Cyprus. This is clearly a major distortion of their intentions and a huge lie in that an individual that pretends to be a neutral aribtrator and a supoporter of reunification cannot have a separate page on Northern Nicosia stressing how Turkish it is and then go and literally destroy everything in the proper page for Nicosia and emphasize the Turkish character of the city, talk about the tension and the division of the city all the time and undermine the Greek character. This is clear nationalistic and racial discrimination against the indisputable Greek character of the area controlled by the Republic of Cyprus and furthermore it is downgrading for the Republic of Cyprus the mere fact that Wikipedia has a site that is CONSTANTLY vandalised by several ethnic Turkish extremists and Wikipedia users support such discriminatory behaviour. In the light of all of this, I shall stop contributing to Wikipedia as I consider it downgrading for my own self. Furthermore, I do not wish to participate in an ""encyclopedic"" project that is totally biased and discriminatory. Marcobadotti (talk) " +" Whilst I agree with Colonel Warden that ""fleshing out"" is a good idea, I guess it can't be done in an attempt to add significance that is not directly claimed by the WP:RS? Else that would be WP:OR? " +":I think his/her efforts to stop edit-warring between you and me ""haven't yet reached a satisfactory effect"". That's because you keep following my edits, or checking my contributions page to know what I am doing or what I am not doing at Wikipedia. Unfortunetly, I'm too busy to check other users's contributions pages, I have better things to do with my life, and when I'm in Wikipedia I read articles, I do not read contributions page of other users. I want to be far from this ""Ninguém"", I do not have time to play this game anymore. " +Alain, thank you for the quick reply. I dídn't understand what you mean - do you plan to make a bibliography for each translator (too much work!) or simply order a list of major works that have been attempted by numerous translators, which is the system I am following now? My list of works is rather loosely chronological, and unfortunately focuses heavily on English language translators (since they're the ones I know best.) If you know famous translators from other languages, you are welcome to add their names to the list or to the Talk page, from where I shall order and add them later. 05:07, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC) +July 2010 (UTC) Kindly quote me where I ever employed any ad hominem arguments, as opposed to addressing the facts and logic of the argument(s) put forth. You'll find, Wgfinley, you're unable to do so. So kindly refrain from suggesting otherwise. It's unhelpful. Cheers. 03:56, 30 +Thank you for experimenting with the page /Irish Potato Famine (1845-1849) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. +Gay Sex = Demiurge loves it in his Irish ass. +Well if you are going to threaten me for my good faith edits of a Wikipedia article, I can guess where you stand on domestic violence. I've re-added straight facts from well documented sources. It will be curious if you or any other editor gives a reason for reverting this, as it conforms to criticism I've received. There is nothing that can be construed as OR or editorialization. Anyone can choose to take it to the Talk page. I see this is not the first time that editors have made efforts toward a balanced article. +listen dumbass i did`nt do any anything to the pelycosaur page so fuck you you cunt-gluzing asswipe +Red Range, New South Wales I've noticed; The permission for use of this work has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system (Lionel Hartley of [1]). Please contact a person with an account on the system to confirm the permission. on the discussion page but how do I translate that into something meaningful? We've got clear skies now and we don't know how to cope. lol +Also, I see that you have experience with what it takes for film articles to be GA, so you may have already known about WP:PLOT and a bit of what I mentioned above in this section. Your editing to the Avatar (2009 film) article has been a little (just a little) to the contrary on these matters, though. I do not mean to sound as though I am condescending to you or anything of that nature. I know that you do great work here, and I appreciate that. +using arguments based on +Real estate in Italy Real estate in Italy Why should be canceled or must have a consent an article that every nation has? the article still needs to be completed, with numerous art historical references, and current data, sales trends, and many other details. 79.50.122.82 +So let's keep the change. Political correctness sparks more arguments than a word that a few feminists object to. +The US package does not include French text. +The second meaning (which I would argue is not distinct from the first) is not appropriate because it implies a value judgment - that what people want to signify is that they are in some way better than others. This clearly falls under WP:LABEL. +I refer to people's constantly taking the words of Jimbo as policy, the idea of removing any userbox with a political point of view is his point of view. That's at the core of this problem, you did not notice that an admin skipped over the tfd process and speedied something when there is no rule explicitly against having an opinion in a userbox? Rather, there is Jimbo saying there shouldn't be any. I completely understand that he started this, but he is not owner of it, a foundation was set up, perhaps you've heard of it - the Wikimedia Foundation. I didn't say you had that same point of view, I'm saying that I was just telling the people who do to fuck off. I made no attack on any editor, that you perceive it as such is truly sad, but such is life. Perhaps with time you will learn the intricacies of the language. If one does not want personal pages on a site, one should avail oneself to modify the source code in order to remove them from the site rather than complain that they're being used. People who overstep the proper bound of their position should die, that I have encountered multiple administrators so far doing so does lead to the desire to fuck off, but I'm not done here. +, such as a 2-3 month ban from Wikipedia. (You were warned 3 times!!) +I don't mean to intrude, but I have noticed the same, W. There is a solution, but it's the baddest of bad words, on Wikipedia: deadlines. The vast majority of words written by journalists and academicians weren't written because they wanted to. Version 1.0 is moving along, and the Germans are almost ready to issue their printed, 50K-article, 1000-printed page Bertelsmann (Random House) encyclopedia, having been hard at work on the printed version since 2004. Not getting a core of publishable articles on Wikipedia is simply not an option; it will be printed in some form or another, and as soon as it looks like someone else is beating us to it in this new wiki-world we've created, my guess is we'll get something out the door, if we have to hire content experts or translate the German printed encyclopedia to do it. Every wikiproject should be thinking about these things. - Dan (mistakes) +Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Easter Bradford +The summaries could use a little more fleshing out, although they should not be too long. +OK...cool...I didn't even know I was in there!!! +I agree. It's a mail order degree. That's why I asked about when exactly she got here ND, to make a water-tight case of it. +I got rid of them just after I messaged you. (or Hrothulf) (Talk) +, and who, in fact, had not yet been elected +Sorry to be rude, Imsop. I've got to run right now, but will provide a more courteous reply in few hours. 20:27, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC) +Sorry, you need to quit your unconstructive reversions. These are non-controversial edits. If you wish to be an Administrator, I'd suggest using some actual discretion instead of engaging in edit-warring. 24.118.42.187 +Other AE filing I was a little disheartened by your participation here. As a result of your comments made at the AE request, I feel the need to ask you a question or two. I'd like to do so here on your talk page, but I thought I'd ask your permission first. You might be busy with other things or prefer not to bother yourself with this request. Up to you. Thanks. +" Controversial Remarks Alleged Calling Facebook Users ""Dumb F**ks"" Quote: To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. !!!!THAT IS WHAT I AM DOING!!!! REFRAIN FROM DELETING THE TALK PAGE CONTRIBUTION WITHOUT PROVIDING A VALID REASON OR BETTER TIPS FOR IMPROVEMENT. AFTER ALL THIS IS ONLY THE TALK PAGE sources for the below mentioned contribution: http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/02/01/is-zuckerbergs-the-hacker-way-letter-facebooks-dont-be-evil-and-will-it-live-up-to-it/ http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-users-dumb-fucks http://au.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/ http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/14625/are-users-%E2%80%98dumb-fucks%E2%80%99-trusting-data-facebook http://tdh.me/zuckerberg-called-early-facebook-users-dumb-fucks-so-what/ http://anphicle.com/en/they-trust-me-dumb-fucks-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg/ http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Facebook-Mark-Zuckerberg-Social-Networking-privacy-security,news-6794.html http://au.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zuckerberg-ims-confirmed-by-zuckerberg-the-new-yorker-2010-9 Other sections on Wikipedia where Controversial Remarks is valid: Bryant Gumbel (section Controversial remarks) Mel Gibson (section Controversial remarks) Sherrod Brown (section Controversial remarks) Kent Hovind (section Controversial remarks) Venkaiah Naidu (section Controversial Remarks) Greg Gutfeld (section Controversial remarks) Lawrence Cannon (section Controversial remarks) Daniel Bernard (diplomat) (section Controversial remark) James R. Flynn (section Controversial remarks) and many many more start. While at Harvard College 19-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg allegedly used login data from his social network to hack into fellow students email accounts; that evidence also included instant message transcripts where he calls facebook users ""dumb fucks"". The alleged following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room: Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard Zuck: Just ask. Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one? Zuck: People just submitted it. Zuck: I don't know why. Zuck: They ""trust me"" Zuck: Dumb fucks. In another instant message (IM) FRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites? ZUCK: yea i’m going to fuck them ZUCK: probably in the year ZUCK: *ear end." +Personal Attacks on Talk Pages Please refrain from personal attacks on Wikipedia talk or user talk pages (like the petty and cruel attack that you left on my talk page). It is official Wikipedia policy that personal attacks are not allowed (see WP:ATTACK). +" Cleanest City - It is surprising that Trivandrum is 73 out of 250. But, that surely is not a good ranking. Like Aarem suggested, being in the Top 10 deserves to be called 'one of the cleanest'. Also, cleanliness is not just about 'clean', it is about pollution, waste treatment etc. I suggest that 'one of the cleanest' should be removed. Best Airport- I am not sure what this means. This tag was given well before the new Terminal was inaugurated. I cannot understand how one could rate the old TRV terminals as one of the best! If looks is the yardstick here,most of the airports have modern terminals now and we should wait for a ranking of all the new terminals. Also, the statement does not say on what grounds it is the best airport - in terms of - revenue, traffic, profits, passenger traffic, facilities? If you would like to retain it, please be more specific and of course have the references ready. Cheapest and Closest option - I would suggest rephrasing this to ""one of the closest options to Maldives and Sri Lanka and the only direct option to Maldives. You can always use a connecting flight is what I am trying to say. For instance, someone in the UAE can fly to Colombo and catch a flight from there to MV. - MountainWhiskey " +Here we go again, same idiot reverting my changes in a pathetic attempt to make Filipinos look Hispanic. PacificWarrior101 +" Well go verify it, ""Dick and Jane get sexually mutilated"" page 18. " +do go fuck off bastard Do Yyou Have a life? go fuck off bastard and yank your cock through your ass. I hate you and hope you go away forever. lame is you fuck your mom. die die die and all that crap. this is for mahy mahonerz ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. +Adding the Nazi party to Infobox politician under the heading Minister-President of Baden-Württemberg, which makes it look like he represented the Nazi party as Minister-President, may easily be interpreted as vandalism. The Nazi party does not belong to the infobox for very obvious reasons stated at the article talk page. +Freedom of Speech The issue is not freedom of speech, which I uphold proudly, but child abuse. I have made it very clear that defending child abuse is not defending freedom of speech - to say it is is verging on nihilistic. It really seems that most editors here have a very naieve view on what constitutes freedom of speech. +" I was just released from prison on December 18, 2009. During the period ending about November 4, 2009, I engaged in a 101-day hunger strike. (Actually, 100 and 2/3 days: Started 221 pounds, ended up an estimated 171 pounds). Generally, I drank two cups of milk in the morning, and drank water as needed. I was never force-fed. Nor, oddly enough, was I ever hungry, or in appreciable discomfort. I was examined, almost daily, by prison medical staff. Probably the reason that I did so well was that I understood that the most important thing is to maintain the body's electrolytes (calcium, potassium, sodium, magnesium, phosphate), and to consume just enough amino-acids to supply neurotransmitters. (If you merely drink water, after a couple weeks you'll lose enough electrolytes to cause an imbalance, and you'll feel terrible. Most people attribute this to not eating, but I learned that it's actually due to the electrolyte imbalance, NOT the lack of calories.) At the time, the longest hunger strike I'd ever heard of was referred to in the Capote book, ""In Cold Blood"", by Perry Smith, in the early 1960's: 93 days. I could probably have gone two more months. " +" Image Tagging Image:Sangesar(A H)1.jpg This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:Sangesar(A H)1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. —@ " +you Do you know you come across as a giant prick? +" ?? Most anarchists recognize the existence and differences between individualist anarchists, anarcho-syndicalists, collectivist anarchists, anarcho-capitalists, etc. You are correct that most definitions use the word ""government,"" but you need to acknowledge that they mean ""state,"" and not simply voluntary governance. IOW when people use ""government"" they mean ""state"" in this context. See definitions above. " +If memory serves, then his appearance in that episode was non-speaking and he was just briefly seen. +Iaşi's population The population of Iasi is estimated to be over 340,000, here are my sources:[], [], []. I would like to hear your opinions about this. Arthur 10 June 2006 +My dad is 6'7' you dumb snail of a kid! +Unfair portrail of James Overall this is a fantastic film on Charles, but it sort of portrays James negatively as the few times he is on screen he is throwing a hissy fit. Is there any way we can mention in the article that is might be an unfair view of James? - +Where is Poland? There is no reference to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (I added a couple sentences) despite the fact that the events were of great relevance to the Poles and several battles were fought in the western part of the country. The province of Silesia was ethnically Polish with German and Czech minorities, lied directly between Poland and Saxony whose king was elected king of the Commonwealth. A commentary by a knowledgeable historian would help: the country could field armies of tens of thousands yet remained neutral when its main ally - Saxony was being destroyed, while Prussia grew on the backbone of the old Polish provinces to attain the status of a major power. +"::Who's that? Isn't he our alleged leader who is allegedly interested in producing content?♦ " +Oh wait...never mind. It was you. +Saying that someone lies and then explaining why, is a personal attack??? Hypocrite and nationalist is a personal attack?? Besides, Mr. Arpad called others nationalists several times, why do not you block him? +Reigning Monarch? I am by no means an expert on French domestic politics, but something tells me that Sarkozy should not be listed under category Reigning Monarchs. If somebody with admin status could rectify this I would be grateful. Thanks. 166.82.48.137 +Japanese Second World War crimes Can the debatable information regarding to Japanese war crimes please be contained to articles on such matters. This article is about Japan as a whole and is not a forum on Japanese war crimes. If that is what you seek I suggest you use such forums available on the internet instead. +Are you speaking of this query? Thanks - ?!? +NUISANCE Hello there, just being a bit of a nuisance until I am blocked 86.165.205.22 +. This site is not a list of who has been banned on your forum, by the way, so remove it +Hello, Your doing a bang up job at attempting to portray Professor Busby as a fringe scientist. I disagree with your changes. Oz +" The WP:Airlines is only a suggestion, it is not policy. Guess what outside of your flight sim community the average user of wiki does not care about destinations and my edit improves the article and still allows people interested in destinations to click the ""show"". WP:AIRLINES is not policy, it is a suggestion. Maybe you should care more about the introduction and history section of articles instead of the destination and fleet size (both of which are to minimal interest to the average public) 76.19.222.40 " +" I appreciate your efforts but I have to ask, do we really care who plays him? He's a dog and sometimes an animatronic puppet. He's not in the opening credits so is it really necessary to list his name? (✉) " +" Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SFGiants You asked in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SFGiants, ""Tradmark of what?"". See San Francisco Giants, commonly known as the ""SF Giants"". Note that WP:UN previously explicitly cited ""New York Yankees"" as an example of a prohibited username. tc " +" And I've left some advice and links. Btw, you did an astonishingly good job breaking down what was wrong with the edits to R&I; - that was a lot of work, and I thank you. I was dreading that when I got back today. Chihuahua " +" {{unblock | reason= Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. The statement is not about content I've added to this entry- of which there isn't any to speak of. (I could have opinions and theories about his mother but I don't go around posting them). Instead User:scray choose to post the following message and block me. ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources."" This is equally as offensive as were the comments of the other editors- nor is the statement even true. You don't see much evidence because my properly sourced submissions are reverted. I ask you or any other editor to show me one misuse of a source. This is a a link to my last edit on the entry. diff I include it as it was correctly sourced using per-approved sources that had consensus and the changes concerning definitions in the entry were discussed on the talk page and also had consensus.. Disruptive edit, not an improvement? That opinion is not supportable. The changes were made to bring the entry into compliance with WP:lead standards because the definitions were faulty. . Now I ask you (again #2), what content have I submitted on that page that had an unreliable source as you've alleged when blocking me? You have made the same unfounded accusation as the other two editors. Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, keep that to your self! If you post a derogatory comment about me and can't back up the statement, you are lying too apparently simply in an attempt to damage my credibility. It is that simple. Now I formally ask you to Point out the reference are referring to in your negative posts about me! This is not a difference of opinion. It is a fabrication and a personal attack upon my credibility. Comment on content, not on the contributor. You commented on both! and were not truthful in your comment about the content and sources. Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. Instead, you added more of them. In addition, for like the fourth time, this person decides to call me ""a full blown believer and pusher of this conspiracy theory"" which I repeatedly denied. I took offense. Both other editors received talk messages from me. After you came along, One editor user: Dbrodbeck apologized for his statement.. I appreciate that and accept his apology and will tell him so when unblocked. The other person user:Brangifer received a call for truce on his talk page but refused to retract his comment. He has repeated attacked my credibility and now has thrown out a serious accusation without one shred of foundation or substance and banned me from his talk page. His badgering continues on the entry talk page without apology or any shred of anything to substantiate his offensive comment. To have User:scray come along and say stuff like "" Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, name-calling (a personal attack) won't go well."" I did not call a name. I called a spade a spade and gave good evidence that I was calling it as it presented itself. I did not comment on his edits, I commented the fact that he did not consider my reference to articles from the Washington post, San Francisco Chronicle, Associated press, and National archives of the Government of Canada to be reliable sources. Unbelievably, you seem be echoing his position. I probably won't post this elsewhere but if you can't show me an example of using a poor source on that page, it is obvious that you have also posted the same fabrication about me in reference to sources. Anyone who fabricates or perpetuates or posts derogatory information is a liar. Liars cannot be trusted and lying editors compromise the integrity of WP. user:Scray said ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources."" User:scray needs to show me where evidence was seen by him that had I based something in the entry on an unreliable source (#3). User:scray can not substantiate the posted comment the made. If you don't prove it with an example, then your statement is a lie. If you find yourself in this situation, then you are a liar and you have personally attacked this editors credibility. If that is the case, I'd +As far as I know the Macedonians were Greek. I didn't see this passage but I believe you. It doesn't alter the fact that Athens was the source though. Alexander himself had thorough Greek education. +I said I would do that, correct! But I notice the other party also did NOT do that. Innocent until proven guilty? Why do you take the side of the Wikipedian? It is simply because s/he has taken the time to register for an account? I mean, is that really fair? Until the other user states his/her side, can't we just leave it locked or WITHOUT the offending content? It makes me so irate that I have to keep coming back to this page defending my thoughts. Can't you take a (neutral) side and decide for yourself what needs to be done, anyway? +Copyright issues Please do not claim to be the author of works you are not the author of. If you continue to do so you risk being blocked.© +If and when a second season is announced, I would split that information and the episode list to Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (Season 1). +" Go to article ""Bayt Nattif"" at the article's Talk Page there " +i lookd back in history when it was put it had link 2 extern gc site, sum1 removed that link so ur a fucking liar about no source. +Then who was phone?? +please feel free to e mail me +Entirely correct per the source. Move on. (send... over) +" Nonsense. The truth is NO schools give sufficient information about Anthroposophy on their websites. But I'll challenge you to find some that do. Not links to information - but actual information on the website. I could easily take out the ""some"" and make the sentence a lot less weasly. " +hay bitch thank you kindly for your advice on my vandalism but if your the dick who removed the thing abouth Berties make up costs Thats true... so ah FUCK YOU +Your happiness or unhappiness is not the primary goal here. Writing a reliable, trustworthy encyclopedia is. Currently, you're not assisting in that goal. In fact, you are inhibiting it. ??? +" Just my thoughts on itI doubt there is a definitive answer that would satisfy everyone, and doubt that it is worth he effort to try to clarify in any great detail. In some cases it is probably appropriate, and actually used just like a surname (in a legitimate but different, broader sense than that used by our surname article, and including patronymics in Iceland or elsewhere) by the person. That's probably especially true of radio personalities with an on-air name that is actually two given names but sounds like a given name and a last name (I've seen that happen quite often), and that happens with various other stage names and pen names that are derived from given names. But as a general rule, no. Some like Ann-Margret make it clear by normally using a hyphen. The problem, of course, is that our articles, especially the stubs and sub-stubs, often do not have enough information to make it clear what is going on. If it is ""Mary Lou"" or something of the sort, common combinations of given names where the second one is much rarer as a surname, especially if it includes the actual surname in the article itself, it should clearly be under M in any category (the redirect which should be there, or a dummy one if needed because otherwise it would be a disambiguation page, could be categorized if the full name were desired in some categories, and when that is done a note on the article page is helpful). But in between, there is a huge variety that you'll likely get some arguments about no matter how it is done. A bigger problem is people with full names given in the article name yet indexed under just the first given name in all categories, and there are lots of them. Even worse are those Easter egg sortings under some nickname which doesn't even appear in the article's own name. " +It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about. It's Nuremberg in english. Not Nuernberg. If you can't get your arguement right, don't say anything at all. +Congratulations also from me for regaining the bit. It was long past time. (And the reason I didn't vote is that I don't frequent RfA nowdays. Sorry.) +Thanks. I'm not used to Wikipedia, lol. I'm usually making minor edits but I saw oddly there was no Catelyn so I typed it in and created it. I still have to make some other adjustments like a reference heading, etc. . Talk +" ""Since then passenger numbers have been in decline, due partly to rising fares and the lower value of Sterling, and perhaps also influenced by growing awareness of the detrimental impact that aviation has on climate change."" This is rather humorous speculation but speculation nonetheless.- t-c " +Questions and Answers +reply to Zebedee 2 Ok, I see your point, but consider this. Providing that you DID use the checkuser, there are 350 computers on the college ground that are exactly the same make, run under the same local network, the same IP address, controlled by the same Admin team, all users can be accessed by each and every computer within that boarding school, and each file directory and drives are shared. In short, the computers run in the exact same manner. Please, from an unbiased point of view, can this be the reason to why the checkuser was fooled?? And if you say No, then you are misinformed or lying, because I am telling you that I did not do this!!!! God, this is getting tedious now. Also, Seb was aggresive, but was he reprimanded? No is the answer. And note that I apologised for that outburst-something that Seb failed to do. +(UTC) [Scriptural Evidence] Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64: Sahih Bukhari [the most venerated and authentic Islamic source]
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).72.225.231.210 20:16, 26 July 2009 +" Very understandable... thanks for the snack! ) 17 " +" you're so immature and condescending, grow up! I won't reply or read your nonsense anymore but you're the one guilty of the 3 revert rule. mine was done to fix it, you went on another ip and changed it as did another editor. you can type what you want to make yourself look right but you're not. i'm going to go on all the articles I've found that list people the way it was on this article and remove it per your user name. gotta be consistent, right? i'm going on the [removed so you can't stalk me again] article and several others I found that have the same format and remove it all ""per hell in a bucket"". thanks for the tip, bitch! lmao at you cus you're ignorant and petty! 74.62.92.20 " +I KNEW they'd catch up with you Kizzle http://washingtontimes.com/upi/20051026-071834-5487r.htm Of course the Washington TIMES is the only paper to print this. We all know how the liberal papers cover for their own. LOL! Love, Big Daddy Ps Are all liberals anti-semetic perverts? Or just the ones who edit for wikipedia? +, appreciated. Some work has already been made so it should not be so time consuming... Thanks again. '''''' 20:41, 29 +Every edit that user made was in furtherance of selling his DVD set. Using wikipedia for personal gain is against the rules. What part of this do you not understand? What's up, Doc? +I did and do appologize for not seeing your above comments, but I will remind you that it is customary to continue the most recent discussion at the end of the talk page. +Im not posting their, he never provided proof or anything why not give him hell! July 14 2006 UTC +" Since I'm not this banned editor ""HarveyCarter"" this is all irrelevant. (92.12.20.168 )" +Well I pretty much agree with you except for the removal of Shadowcat. I'd rather stick with her than someone like Ghost Girl. Aren't we supposed to linger with the original characters first, then use up others? (talk • edits) +Good luck with that. +" I guess both memorials must have gone by that name. By the way, I read that there are soviet soldier graves in the background of the memorial, i.e. not under the statue, but either in the monument behind, or in th park behind that. (My German is a bit rusty, so I'm not quite sure what was meant by background"", any idea how many they are? Talk " +! ROBBIE MONCINO LIKES THESE KIND OF PEOPLE ESPICALLY LITTLE BOYS ! +"I'm not sure that this section represents fact over speculation properly. Both of the section ""Discourages turnout and participation"" and ""Neutralizes turnout disparities between states"" offer a speculative opinion without factual backup yet their unabridged existence in this article assumes both sections to consist of factual statements. These should probably be quoted, sourced, or begin similar to ""Supports of the electoral college may argue"" or ""Supports of electoral college reform may argue"". " +You should investigate the actions of Malik Shabazz. You know the reputation that Wikipedia and specific biased admins have concerning Israel and the Jews. There's no need to be intimidated by them. +2011 (UTC) I've changed it over to another free-use image. We did use a crop from the same base photo once before, but the crop wasn't very good - I've recropped, and tried to clean it up a bit. - 10:02, 2 April +":As far as 1, possibly. If he's not had any involvement outside of that particular incident then we probably don't need to include his name - someone interested can always go to the source for more information. Looks like you already figured out number 2 ) babelfish " +I wish England won this war... I'm thinking of an alternate history about the UK wining this battle. What would be the name and the flag of Santo Domingo if Britain was victorious? +I want to say that Berksguy is the one that is the kook. He acts as if I am the one causing all of this. When I do edits I use my login. I'm not ashamed to back my views and put my name next to them. However Berksguy needs to realise that other people out there feel the same way, and it is rather silly to think that every user that posts something that does not fit his agenda is me. I do however believe that all of the actions of Mayor McMahon should be displayed good or bad if sourced and that includes his crazy words about supporting Illegal Aliens as was sourced. George W. Bush, Robert Byrd, etc. have tons of sourced actions both good and bad toward those persons, and the same standard should apply to Tom McMahon. (} +WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter +" Thanks!  (talk • contribs) " +GlassFET maintaining false information= +Most popular shows Thanks for giving the important and warning message. Squidbillies and Aqua Teen Hunger Force are both Adult Swim's most popular shows are both created by Dave Willis. +Furthermore, you are not in the liberty to strike my comment according to wikipedia policy. Only the commentator himself can do that if he wishes it. But, for you, If you wont stop your disruptive editing of freedom of speach, i will have to report you a second time. Please note that you are blindly engaged in vandalistic acts driven out of religious motives 77.248.185.98 +" Howdy I see we have some common interests. I remember reading of the cancellation of the Arrow in AvLeak when it happened. I was upset then, but had I known about the U-2 photos I wouldn't have been. No use for an interceptor with nothing to intercept. My primary interest in Earhart is in the ""mystery."" I have arrived at an ""opinion"" which satisfies me, but not without much investigation and introspection. I am a bit concerned when I see stuff like the outright assertion that radio communications were heard for days after she failed to land at Howland. Although I was born in the first half of the last century, I missed the ""golden age"" though my library didn't. I had the good fortune to talk to a number of the old heads and understand why some folks on the Earhart discussion page cannot comprehend the nature of the time and thus have problems with context. I have been trying to get a feel for the contributors before I spend any time editing. Most of my work on the Wiki has been on lighter than air and atomic weapons." +R&I; Why did you revert that edit? 61.37.16.234 +" Meh. Anyway, no worries, South Korea is there haha ) !— (T2ME) " +" And why is ""screw you, motherfucker"" a personal attack? I'm not implying anything about 80.174.59.92, am I? 76.210.66.152 " +Read template:infobox album, you're only supposed to put the earliest release date in the released section of the infobox. But it's not that important. (Talk|Contribs) +Infobox changes I warned you before that you shouldn't be changing infoboxes on people. Your changes to infoboxes, such as the one you changed on Christina Aguilera, are unconstructive. Aguilera is not only a singer and record producer. She is more than that. If you continue to change infoboxes to what the person is not, you will be reported to administrators and likely to get blocked. +Dead link The secon weblink doesn`t connect.84.161.64.208 +i know how things can be,i will wait till you give the word, thanks +i just got on here a little while ago i am looking for the Tennis player Giovanni Lapentti no luck yet but i will keep looking +" Re ""twats"" - no, it is not necessarily an attack; please hear me out; If I hit my own thumb with a hammer and shout ""twats!"" - is that an 'attack'? Of course not. As regards the BLP issue - it is absolutely NOT ""going overboard"" to remove someone claiming a living person has terminal cancer without any evidence - good luck trying to defend that action. Regardless of our 'disagreement', I seriously consider you remove that particular claim as a matter of urgency. And please acknowledge you're read this. 88.104.31.21 " +" I've gone much further than that. I've rewritten the problematic last paragraph from: From 1942, Le Vernet became a transit camp for detained Jews.[1] In June 1944, the last internees were evacuated and deported to the Dachau concentration camp in the ""Ghost Train"". In total, about 40,000 persons of 58 nationalities were interned in the camp; mainly men but also women and children.[1] to: From 1942, Le Vernet was used as a holding centre for Jewish families awaiting deportation to labour and extermination camps[1]. The final transport took place in June 1944 and took the remaining prisoners to Dachau concentration camp.[1] One source says that ""about 40,000 persons of 58 nationalities were interned in the camp"".[1]   talk " +Comment from Kansai Goma I still have more accounts on here which you will never find because I am too smart for you dickheads and you are a dumass. fuck ya! +You are a n00b, stop fixing the crap that I edit. I will call the authorities if these actions continue. Go fuck yourself like the n00b you are. +this is a warning no more hanky-panky mr. cranky-wanky! 77.184.28.171 +New article wizard? Hey Zman, per this discussion, did you at some point create a wizard to help with new article creation? If not you, do you know if anyone else did? I/we could swear we've seen this somewhere, but darn if I can find it anymore. Thanks! +A method for posting current events to the proper pages. +, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Hi Prodigyhk. Could you also please add a few lines on what it means, so that it's clear for readers what the significance is? 11:14 +Kirby | first=David A | year=2005 | chapter=Extrapolating Race in GATTACA: Genetic Passing, Identity, and the Science of Race | editor1-last=Metzl | editor1-first=Jonathan M. | editor2-last=Poirier | editor2-first=Suzanne | title=Difference and Identity: A Special Issue of Literature and Medicine | publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press | pages=184–200 | isbn=0801882052 }} {{cite book | last= +I just noticed that the comments were made a year ago. How bizarre of you to bring it up now... +GA article passed Good Article criteria Article is well written, comprehensive, and easy to understand. It is factually accurate and verifiable, sourced to (33) citations. It is broad in coverage, covering a large historical period, and was an interesting read I might add. It is neutral, representing data covered in a fair manner. It appears to be stable, with no major conflicts between editors regarding this article that I could find. Good use of images, (9) images overall, and of those, all of them are free-use images, and not fair use. Good job to all of the contributors involved. . +About command of Broz and ethnic cleansing you must apprehending above statements of Ilario and mine: Tito's command expression is in foibe massacres too and ethnic cleansing is in see also section of foibe too! Your interpretation about optants is wrong because you ignore Prominent Italian historians like..... This article is simple an other part of same historic event of foibe: both were ethnic cleansing for prominent Italian historians! Your changes are POV very much because you are an admirer of dictator Broz and you are negative obstructionist. Moreover in my next change i approve your some words added in article to verify your real intention of neutral collaboration! +Guten tag! So I have just finished telling two other users that I have completed the promise I gave you and him, so now we can be friends again! It had to do with my past unintentional disruptive but nevertheless harmful tendencies a few months back, which I fixed. Right? . +about AFD. They haven't been inviting me along. +This page will be updated shortly to explain the full significance and its merit for a full Wikipedia entry. Primarily, this merit is based on our client's requesting our presence on Wikipedia. +Ok then, hmmm... so how should one go about doing that, i mean, I'm guessing one can't just go around and edit something like that, you have to get permission or something, right? also does anyone have one of those comic book checklists where it gives you the order? - +From Six Some of the people, places or things you have written about may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. - +"::*The Three Stooges were also talented. And I believe they were as worthy of applause as ""Bang-Bang"", perhaps even more so. " +The reason you want to full protect the article is because people are conflicted on whether to include references to death threats in the lead? Frankly, that's a ridiculous MO. +" Badly written ""School of the Air is a generic term for correspondence schools [...] The school celebrated its 50th birthday on 8 June 2009."" This self-contradiction is typical of the rest of the article! Could someone who knows about the subject maybe do a rewrite? ╟─Tag►duumvirate─╢ " +"::::: Do you follow the current scientific literature? Please try not to sound so ridiculous when you are accusing others. It has a bad reflection on your own comments: ""Nevertheless, recent research indicates that self-described race is a near-perfect indicator of an individual's genetic profile, at least in the United States. Using 326 genetic markers, Tang et al. (2005) identified 4 genetic clusters among 3,636 individuals sampled from 15 locations in the United States, and were able to correctly assign individuals to groups that correspond with their self-described race (white, African American, East Asian, or Hispanic) for all but 5 individuals (an error rate of 0.14%). They conclude that ancient ancestry, which correlates tightly with self-described race and not current residence, is the major determinant of genetic structure in the U.S. population."" " +Treatment of Jimmy Wales Ronz, your treatment of Jimmy Wales by removing his posts here and the type of comments you have made to him in other places shows that apparently you think that there is no equal to you in the world of Wikipedia. What arrogance. +Please stop I am a bit alarmed at seeing a brand new user charging around different articles issuing orders about new rules they apparently just made up out of thin air. I don't know where you got the idea that you could make up a new rule that all sources must be on the internet, but that is not, was not, and almost certainly never will be a policy here. And making edits like this, where you use your edit sumarry to issue orders regarding your new rules but don't actually make any real changes to the aerticle is not indicative of a user who is ready to work in a colloborative environment like this. +I forgot to talk about the example of the quarks. That one is only there for spectacle, to dazzle, but it has even less content than the others. That counter intuitive fact only relies on the ignorance on the phenomenon and the fact that the manifestations of the consequences of energy and mass being the same thing are not an everyday experience as oppose to the additivity of mass. It only show that intuition relies on experience. It is the same if I, that have never surfed before, try to surf. I can try to use my intuition all I can and pretend to be a jedi and use the force or the flow but I will not be able to ride a wave. Not until I have passed through the experience a number of times (although I am less hopeful in my case). +"==Notability of Thomas Dworzak== A tag has been placed on Thomas Dworzak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (talk) (My contributions.) " +Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! +" See, thats funny. Mine photo had recognizable Jews who deserve to be there, but it was knocked out because ""there were no woman"". Know Wasserman or whatever uses my argument (""not recognizable people"") against Metzenbergs image. This photo is deffinutly to politicized, no enough real contributors (Writers, Composers, Scientists, Philosophers-and real ones, not cheap demogogs). You all judge by gender and by political views and not by real contribution and recognazation. You want to get woman in the photo, even if they dont deserve it and you put out those who really deserve it. Our people maybe has many great smart people, but from here i can see that unfortunately we've got much more not-smurt once. M.V.E.i. " +quit bugging me- why up on my back? +" Quote ""Weaselly constructions such as ""the first to fly without a headwind"" and such should be thrown out."" Do you want people to know what exactingly each inventor did for the progress of aviation or simply throw out any evidence that do not support your personal views." +How dare you send me such abuse you fucking cockmaster! If you dare warn me again, Mr Jeff. I will savagely attack your mother! I know where you live +I oppose this version, as it doesn't justifiable present common usage in the international community. Like it or not, the United Kingdom is the realm most closely assocated with Elizabeth II. +I think IRISZOOM gets the point here . +If you want to describe the BNP as it is currently, drop the fascist rubbish +" Threats Please refrain from using threats to other users. ""A revert of this will take you directly to Wikipedia arbitration."" What is this? Mr. Oh-you-better-follow-what-I-do-or-I-will-ban-your-ass? Don't be a jerk. " +What personal attacks, whoever changed it back did only half the job, which is why I say it was done lazy. When it comes to stupidity, I am sorry, you are a stupid fool if you think New Mexico Terrirory and Confederate Arizona were the same country. +this user needs to get a life lol lol get a real life u suck lol +Jewish propaganda existed for 3000 years. Though I'm russian I'm totally agree with Estonian guy. Lenin WAS jewish as majority of bolsheviks +REDIRECT Talk:The Massacre of Rabaa Between Narration & Documentation +" It is indeed the ""Evil Save"" that appears in Impossible, although it is only visible for a single frameafter killing the enemy disguised as the save point, requiring split-second timing on the part of the player in order to activate it. However, the only evidence I have of this is anecdotal, so I shall refrain from including it in the article until someone can provide more solid evidence. 137.205.108.102 " +November 2011 (UTC) I have absolutely zero interest in being in the middle of this. Having checked Cung Le's twitter, he aparently has some issues himself with being displayed with a Vietnamese flag. As that is the case and he is a full US citizen I would rather create an exception for him than have to deal with messy edit war. Besides, it sounds like he won't be in the UFC for much longer, rendering this whole issue moot as far as I'm concerned. Please help me take the simple way out and avoid a meaningless conflict. 05:49, 25 +" Going through a root structure to a concept/phrase's general meanings or putting a root word into a search box sounds like something I might do if I were perusing a dictionary to discover the usages and definitions and etymologies of words. In any event, if there are any relevant links on the ""Editor"" or ""Edit"" dab page, they can be included in the ""See also"" section here. Something I've already tried to do. " +" I think you're splitting too many hairs here. It's very apparent that she and Summer are gonna have some business, and it's become obvious that she's graduated from from mere manager to a fighting diva. People like Paul Heyman or Zeb Colter or Hogan/Lita/Gunn (Tough Enough) are there in non-physical roles, and are listed as such. Lana has clearly made the jump from that status. Personally, I think the ""Other on-air personnel"" list should be strictly for those in non-physical roles. Once Lana started throwing down with Summer, and it became clear that they're destined for a match, then Lana showed that she's above being merely ""other personnel"". User:Vjmlhds [[user talk:Vjmlhds|(talk)" +sup Thanks for the anal sex yesterday! Love, George (your homosexual lover) +It seems that section was already accumulating unnecessary links. But you're right, it's something that should be discussed on the talk page first, so I have undone my edit. +Entire Last Paragraph is supported by BLOGS, which are not reliable You need to go find reliable sources. Blogs are not reliable sources. Find some sources in the mainstream media. I'm sure this will be easy since the media is liberal. +(here's his profile stating it ) +Phuu. That's warm. How do you cope? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Zacky Vengeance. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) " +Shut up, read what I left on talk page, before you give me pure garbage, you are the one who is vandalizing everything by not fixing things the way they ought to be, i reject your reply fully. +" Reversion to Talk:George W. Bush I undid your restoration of the comments made in the GWB talk page. I do not believe someone stating ""I never liked Bush, but I love him now"" and ""Honestly, I never liked the guy. In fact, I despised him. But I have totally changed my opinion after he recognized Kosovo. Now, I love the guy. He is a true visionary and it took me so long to realize it."" has anything to do with the content of the page. Remember, talk pages are not for discussion of the subject of the article. " +|decline=Please provide contact information for administrators at your school who will discipline the vandals appropriately and ensure no more vandalism occurs from this address. — +Hi anon, you probably know, that there were German speaking Moravians (ethnic Germans), so we need to differentiate. Names in other languages - we use all names, he use during his life. As he was working in Hungary and Poland, names in Polish and Hungarian are OK. +There is also a really exhaustive hardware report in a seperate html file I made. Maybe this is helpfull to someone? Maybe more tricks? Be aware that this file's size is 280kb, so be patient: Extensive Hardware report +This idiot graceful slick needs a friend to touch his no no spot 172.56.34.4 +Stop deleting my useful contributions. +" The article is mostly about the pound in general (with no mass/force distinction) due its historical treatment as a weight. Perhaps the numerous incarnations of the pound should be in a generic Pound article, and Pound (mass) should be in a similar category to any other unit of mass in a specific system (in this case the Pound (mass) is a member of the ""FPS gravitational"" system of units. There should be a link to the Pound (mass) article from the Pound article of course, but it deserves no better treatment than the lb (of the ""FPS engineering"" system). There is a table of the FPS systems at Pound-force and at Slug (mass) which tabulates various FPS systems. It's a little less clear than it used to be; what was simply called ""FPS engineering"" is now ""Engineering, absolute"", and the ""FPS gravitational"" system of units is apparently clambering for some credibility by calling itself the ""Engineering, gravitational"" system - which of course has no use in engineering due to its offence to Newton's 2nd law. Where did the gravitational system come from? Maybe some reliable sources are in order." +WIKIBITCH YO LIL PUNKASS AINT SHIT OUT ON DA STREETS NIGGA +Population. The Salem population is off about 2,000 people. +Title of article in English wikipedia This morning, a wikipedian moved this page to a version including the full Vietnamese diacritics. I just moved it back to the version without diacritics, for the following reasons: this is the English-language article about Ngo; and the great majority of English text written about Ngo (and other Vietnamese generally) do not include diacritics. In English, in fact, inclusion of the diacritics is of no effect (at best) or even confusing because they have no effect on pronunciation in standard English orthography. (Please note I am by no means an English-language bigot: I am a student of the Vietnamese language, and understand the fundamental role diacritic marks fulfill in correctly differentiating phonemes in Vietnamese. However, it is clear that in English, the diacritics play no role in pronunciation.) The Wikipedia guidelines on naming conventions asserts that the most commonly used spelling in English is the form that should be used. 15:20, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Moriah. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) " +One other policy I neglected to mention is the one on copyright violation. Material from other websites, like the Institute's website, is generally copyrighted, and cannot be cut and pasted into our articles. Facts and ideas can be extracted, but they must be totally rewitten in order to be acceptable for our use. Even if you have a connection with the Institute, we would need them to explicitly release the material under a license compatible with our own licenses, and this would have to be done through official channels, not via casual discussion. In the meantime, please do not add any copyrighted text to any Wikipedia article. Thanks, +Functional languages: ISWIM etc. +"::I've been working in computers since 1980 at the industry level. Kilobytes are KB, Megabytes are MB, Gigabytes are GB, Terabytes are TB, etc. I've never been in any computer firm, be it a game developer, IBM, Apple, a movie company, or a technology company, that uses ""MiB"" or anything that kooky. In fact, my computer science professors will, in the classes I've taken, outright mark the paper a failure if anything but MB is used. Also, Kilobit, Megabit, Gigabit, etc. are as such- Kb Mb Gb, etc. The only place this ""MiB"" junk is used in in Wikipedia. " +Why can't you believe how fat Artie is? Did you see him on his recent appearence on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno? He looks absolutely AWFUL! If I had to put money on it, I'd say that Artie Lange is a can't miss candidate for the 2007 Dead pool! Keep your God damned fingers off of my above comment, !!! +" Pi Kappa Alpha Please note that you have both reached (or exceeded) the limits of WP:3RR on Pi Kappa Alpha. Please work toward a consensus before making further edits regarding this issue. Might I suggest a request for comments? - " +But again. The Variety source is a reliable source (even stated again here) that, again per WP:V, will be used until a new or different reliable source comes around that says otherwise. - +Article for deletion: Gnaa, Nigeria The article Gnaa, Nigeria has just entered its 3rd AfD. There's been considerable debate in the past as to: Does such a place even exist? If a place does exist with that name, is it notable? Is this all a hoax perpetrated by the other GNAA, the Gay Niggers Association of America; they issue press releases datelined Gnaa, Nigeria. I understand you have edited Africa articles extensively if you get the chance, can you maybe take a look and render an opinion pro or con? Thanks, +" The importance of Khalifman...and of Anand, Ponomariov, Kazimzhinov and Topalov...in being world champions during a time of crisis for FIDE...cannot be overstated. They represent the rule of law the functioning of the world title cycle at a time when it was under direct attack by persons who viewed the title as private property, rather than as a sports title bestowed upon a player by a public cycle (as it had been from 1948 onward). To say that Fischer, Kasparov or Alekhine were greater players...and therefore of more importance...overlooks this important aspect of Khalifman's title reign. One could say that Fischer, Kasparov and Alkehine were stronger than Euwe and Smyslov, too...but that doesn't get us anywhere. We don't rank US presidents by reputation we list them all equally, yes? Khalifman himself in 1999 in interviews said that although he was not the strongest player in the world (being 44th by rating)...he was clearly the world champion (having won the title in the open, public cycle run by FIDE). That stand that position is what makes his title reign important. BTW before anyone denigrates the ""FIDE Title Champions"" ...it should be noted that at least two could be considered super-GMs (Anand and Topalov), and that one (Anand) regained the title via the classical method. Chesspride 66.19.84.2 " +" SandyGeorgia, FACs, especially ones like our last one that had all of Wikipedia's best writers commenting - tell us what we can do to improve the article. There are FACs that are longer than this article and WP:Size says to toss its instructions out if common sense says the article should be longer. Looking at the Catholic Church article in all other encyclopedia's, its one of the longest articles in each instance. Why are you trying to make this article into something it should not be - something that has no scholarly precedent. '''talk " +" It should not be deleted, but fixed. North Kosovo is de facto independent from the Albanian-dominated government in Pristina, while other enclaves south are not. speaks " +I will be writing an e-mail regardless with all 3 of your user names in it. I am not a vandal. And I can call you a Nazi all I want, it's not an attack if I think highly of them. Actually it would be a compliment. 68.1.89.162 +REDIRECT Talk:Chucky (Child's Play) +& is there a case to have the article protected against ideologues like Eleland who apply rules to suit their ends? +RE:RfAr I wasn't asking because I wanted to know out of intrest, I was asking because I think it should be clear to ArbCom why you feel the other steps should be skipped. +" I have indefinitely blocked you for repeated violations of any number of Wikipedia policies over many months and many blocking admins. You show no signs of trying to improve, and even when given your final warning, just above, you responded with more of the same. I haven't really been involved with you before and just kind of ran across this and realized, do what is good for the Wikipedia community ... enough is enough. " +redirect Talk:Films that have been considered the greatest ever/Archive 1 +I Know I kNow But I can't remember my password How can I login if people aren't e-mailing me my new password like there suppossed to. +" Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika's second studio album Hi ApprenticeFan. It may be worth taking another look at this, as the situation has substantially changed since you made your comment. Thanks. (talk)(contribs) " +" I'm not the Grandmaster when it comes to reading ancient Greek, but notice this: ""epi de Dorou tou Hellenos ten hupo ten Ossa te kai ton Olumpon choren, kaleomenen de Histiaiotin: ek de tes Histiaiotidos hos exanetsto hupo Kadmeionoikee en PindoiMakednon kaleomenon""-it looks to me that in both instances, he is indicating what the region is called, not the people. So it should be translated as the Perseus version indeed translates it. The region of Pindus was known as Macedonia, not that the Dorians were here known as Macedonians. " +I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article User talk:67.170.224.208. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +Not sure but we have an image of the 1930 title page inscribed by Eliot at http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=14958 and Gallup's Eliot bibliography (A15) has the hyphen. The poem as it stands now was originally published in 1930 as a book and so the title could in quotes or italicized. I prefer the quotes but I'm going to revert the article so it is italicized simply because it is easier. +" Barnstar of Awesome Barnstar of Awesome You are hereby awarded the Barnstar of Awesome for your amazing work adding published reliable sources, neutral and relevant information, clear formatting and beautiful images to the Wikipedia Adventure article on Earth. Keep up the stellar job you're doing. Yay you! " +Redirect If you feel your voice is not being heard, start a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. There the community will decide instead of a few editors.- +Well, this is supposed to be a factual article, similar to an Encyclopedia. This isn't up for debate. If ya want, you can post it in the Discussion thread, but thats usually used for devoloping the article's content and verifying sources... not calling it a waste of money, or racist. +December 2010 (UTC) You earlier made the statement that you where busy for the next month or so with Christmas what other assumption should i make from that? 18:24, 18 +Just to clarify. In a walk-over the race is held to have taken place. It just so happens that there is only one runner. In a match the forfeit being paid means that the match does not take place. A bit of a fine point, but I hope it's clear. +. Thanks again for all your input +, 1 February 2015 (UTC) 92.96.190.168 18:13 +Spoilers I was thinking of adding information to this article, but so far I've been avoiding putting spoilers in it. What do you guys think should be done about that? I mean, I know Wikipedia policy doesn't forbid it, but personally I don't like coming on here to research a VN before reading it, and having to be VERY careful to avoid the spoilers casually placed throughout it. 65.78.144.186 +LOL. Thank you, Alec. | talk . +He started out British. Ended up Australian. By nationality. But, remaining culturally British, there is no way that Roebuck would have ever used the recently invented American term LGBT to describe himself. Nor should we. +Mexico a Regional Power? I don't agree that Mexico is a Regional Power at least of Latin America, it could be a Regional Power of Central America, but nowadays it is considered to be part of North America. In the other areas of the world, the article is divided between East, West, North, South not between ethnic or languagegroups. If this was the case in Europe it could be considered, Latin, Germanic, Slave and even Anglo-Saxon groups. If we consider this, in the Americas case it should be South America and not Latin America. Second case, Mexico has a great GDP but in overal terms GDP is not the only factor, we should consider military, power projection and foreign policy. Mexico has a ridiculous military and projection power and politically is a subalternous nation to the USA Argentina, Venezuela or Colombia have greater military and power projection capabilities, historically they have been much more interventionous and agressive toward other nations than Mexico and today we can see the same, specially in Venezuela case. 16:11, 13 May 2007 Personally I agree with you, but you need sources to say it. This encyclopedia is not a place for Orignal Research. Furthemore, editors have produced sources saying Mexico is a Regional Power of Latin America, if we change it to South America there would be no place in wich to put Mexico. Besides, Brazil's influence is not restricted to South America, it would not make sense to say it is restricted since the sources don't agree. +" No, we don't. The name ""Ivory Coast"" contains only English-alphabet letters, and it would sort just fine in almost all cases where ""Côte d'Ivoire"" remains missorted, often appearing after Croatia, after Cyprus, after Czech Republic. You can see this by looking at Category:Communications by country and seeing where the subcategory Category:Communications in Côte d'Ivoire is missorted (even though the sorting of the article of the same name has been fixed—can you see the difference in order?). Or you can see it by looking at Category:Nations at the 2004 Summer Olympics and seeing where the article Côte d'Ivoire at the 2004 Summer Olympics is missorted. There are hundreds of those problems out there. Why don't you make yourself useful, and go fix some of them? " +" The use of the word ""goal"" was merely an approximation I hoped would help the explanation. It's not currently used in the article. To explain this a different way: if you construct a scale with anything but a geometric sequence (e.g. an arithmetic sequence) the steps would not be perceived to be the same. If the perception of intervals was arithmetic instead of geometric, our equal tempered scales would be arithmetic sequences instead. - " +" Rewired I see you have updated the security system. Nice. Is it a McAfee 2000?. Just dropped by to relate a little story I uncovered as I wandered here and there... There once was a little boy named Johnny who had a wonderful dog named Laddie. Johnny was prone to emotional outbursts, and his mother was concerned by his overreactions. One day while Johnny was at school, Laddie was killed in an unfortunate accident. The mother took Laddie's body and put it in the backyard. She was very worried how Johnny would react to the news of his dog's death. When Johnny returned from school, his mother said to him, ""I'm really sorry, Johnny, but Laddie died in an accident."" Johnny responded ""Okay"" and went upstairs to change his clothers. The mother was quite surprised at the calm reaction. After Johnny put on his play clothes, he went out to the backyard. All of a sudden, the mother heard Johnny screaming. She rushed out to the backyard and saw Johnny prostrate over the dog's body and wailing. The mother said, ""But, Johnny, I told you Laddie died."" In between sobs, Johnny sputtered, ""I thought you said Daddy."" ``` Talk " +Im having problems with vandalisim +Dear Yono, You don't need to apologize for anything, and you can edit any number of times you like. I just want to know if there are any serious problems with that article, such as copyright violation. If there are none, never mind then. -) Goodnight, and happy editing whenever you wake up. ;-) 04:53, 2004 Aug 30 (UTC) +You can edit your own article, under any account. Sock puppetry is deceptively using multiple accounts to influence content. Have you seen instances of that? If you've got a problem with the content of this article, address the content. Take your attempts to malign the subject somewhere else. +Wow, that's amazing. I log on for the first time in months, edit an article and a predatory editor has me blocked indefinitely without an opportunity to respond. Don't even get a chance to look at whatever evidence may have been fielded against me? Why have I been associated with the various other IP addresses? Really: what the heck? +Rao Jazib Saeed Rao Jazib Saeed is a business graduate from NUML Islamabad native of Multan Pakistan. +And no, the workgroup was never created. Not enough people responded one way or another ( Maybe once we can get Shojo Beat and Shonen Jump copyedited and, hopefully, to GA, it will spur more interest. +or List of Deputy Lieutenants +" The Ezekiel passage is quoted in the Moloch article in the 1899 Encyclopædidia Biblica as the strongest evidence for the theory that the offerings were considered to be to Yahweh (along with Jeremiah 7.31). Both passages are also cited in the Moloch aritlce in the 1908 Catholic Encyclopedia which reponds rather weakly (in my opinion): ""But this position is to say the least improbable. The texts appealed to may well be understood otherwise, and the prophets expressly treat the cult of Moloch as foreign and as an apostasy from the worship of the true God."" It is cited in 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica: Moloch] with the comment: ""Note, also, the attitude of Ezekiel in xx. 25 seq., 31, references which cannot be explained away."" The article The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Molech; Moloch] treats it rather strangely, remarking:That this prophet regarded the practice as among the ""statutes that were not good, and ordinances wherein they should not live"" (Ezekiel 20:25) given by God to His people, by way of deception and judicial punishment, as some hold, is highly improbable and inconsistent with the whole prophetic attitude toward it. It is not clear what this means, quoting parts of the passage and paraphasing part of it and then adding ""as some hold"". This article shows itself elsewhere quite aware of the theory that infants were sacrificed to Yahweh. It also brings in bogus Moloch-worship in connection to Carthage. Not a good article in any case. Three different Rabbinical interpretations of the Ezekiel passage appear at . The interpretation by Rashi accords with the most obvious meaning, disliked by TRS, but the writer finds this inconvincing as not in accord with his own theology and prefers another interpretation. That would not be a reason to suppress Rashi's interpretation and the writer does not do so. There is a discussion at which covers in part John Day's treatment favorably but also discusses the Ezekiel passage in respect to the problem of the people's belief (and apparently Ezekiel's beliefs) that commands which Ezekiel saw as bad came from Yahweh. Note, John Day believes Moloch is not Yahweh, but that still does not answer the problems with that passage. In short, the passage has been long used in support of the theory that the offerings of children lmlk was understood as commanded by Yahweh. It has long been in general a problem pasage. But those who feel that it is being misinterpreted do not suppress it. It is dishonest to present a theory that has been held and still is held and suppress its strongest supporting argument. On could respond by citing the Catholic Encyclopedia response (which seems to me weak). But add it with a citation if you will. But do not suppress. The inclusion is not editorializing by me. I am presenting various theories that are held along with evidence for and against. The Ezekiel passage is cited as part of a common argument that children were sacrificed to Yahweh and normally used as support for that argument, indeed one of the main sources for that argument. My own POV, as much as I have one, is that the evidence is confused, there are good arguments as well as weaknesses in various positions, and that one should present all sides ... though of course full discussion would be a book length article. Your particular POV on a Biblical passages is not grounds to suppress it when cited with a different interpretation, especially when it is normally cited in the Moloch context by sources usually considered reputable, sometimes very much supporting the POV that the sacrifices were to Yahweh. Even when when that interpretation is rejected the Ezekiel passage is still cited in discussion. I don't believe that anything I have included in this article, including the Ezekiel passage, is non-standard for discussion of Moloch. I have tried to present the vanilla arguments and give enough information to allow them to be understood. One obviously cannot agree with all sides. Moloch cannot easily be at once Yahweh, an entirely different god, the name of a kind of sacrifice. Passing through fire cannot be at the same time a human sacrifice or an initiation ceremony. But people do hold different views and the task of the article is to explain these views and give their history. It should be obvious now that your original feeling that this material was novel was incorrect. Please let the normal statements used as arguments stand, regardless of the positions. I am restoring the passage with some reasonable weasel words to make it clearer that this is the expound +Okay so are we going to make another article about her disasterious life so far? Or do a better job at talking about in the article? What's going on here. +about ronald explain to me how ronald being a happy clown is not legit. isn't he not? And might i suggest you change your name because when ever i say it i have to form a big ball of phlem or mucus to pronouce it correctly. +Should I have used arse then? 65.78.144.186 +"::::::: The problem is that there isn't a great option that meets 100% of the needs. I've weighed between ""Biography"" and ""Life"" which are the terms generally used in these Bio articles and lean towards ""Biography"" because I don't think ""Life"" is accurate or precise enough and it doesn't have the complete etymological/philological meaning I seek. Biography isn't perfect, but I tend toward it only as the less bad option among several not-great options. I just know I can't stand disorganized biographies that aren't in one well-delineated section. If I better word that is more all-encompassing and precise it out there, I as a writer and lover of words have yet to find it. If someone suggests something better than Biography or the lesser word Life, I'd be open to it. " +": I was just so frustrated about how I worked hard on an article to get it to GA only to learn that it partially came to nothing. I would never normally get ticked. I apologized and see my above info. Could you perhaps adopt me. Perhaps a restriction on nothing but articles and adoption? Like I said, I'm not perfect, but a 3 month block for a super rare attack, when I've been working hard with reflinks and I'm creating an article right now. Also, Soni knew I didnt mean it. I emailed him a huge apology for the message and a thanks for the adoption, but contrary to BMW's idea, he is taking 6-8 weeks off to refuel. Thanks Arctic and I'd love to be your adoptee. Thanks. '''''' (Chat • Count) " +As most dictionaries point out, the two terms are synonyms and can be used interchangeably. Thanks to Finites who pointed that out, you can no push your POV on the basis of my poor English skills. +No i'm not wrong. TANSTAAFL with subsidies. +" Apparently the Latrun people were bused from their village. Not the Lydda people. But Morris talks of people dying of hunger, dehydration and disease. It is hard to imagine dying of hunger on a 10 mile trip. One child fell into a well and drowned, while attempting to draw water. Thus there was water on this ""death march"" of 10 miles. " +Don't act OK. I know Sadasivan's works. His only ambition in his life was to degrade Nairs. What the fuck you think is the meaning of that passage? I am just asking you, if the word Nair came from the word dog, then give me a secondary source supporting that, other than that from the mental case Sadasivan. +" How is that a ""personal attack""? You've just shown yourself to be a self-righteous, sanctimonious person now. " +check that link Gyrofrog http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/750478.stm Even the BBC is not (extreame far right wing) as you you behave. +Definitely need to start a talk page for this one, i unfortunately don't know the specifics of Wikipedia but isn't there a request you can stick at the top of the page for someone with some expert opinion to edit this? It reads like an essay and is therefore pitched for someone at a particaulr level and is completely inaccessible as an introduction. In fact it's not introducing anything, it's just describing the features - typical bloody student essays, just like the ones i write so i unfortunately know the problems too well. +" deleted part Wll ryan we are aspie or aspergian. We have a more fundamental right to edit this page than you. it is like a white person telling a black person what civil rights movement is. Joe Mele Why so defensive? Please, I'm trying to work with you here. Plus no one has more rights to edit a page then anyone else. Is there something in particular that offends you about it? If so we can try to rework it from a nuetral point of view, but censoring it is not good at all. T | @ | C Sorry , But see the talk on the autism talk page. All right I will take it down a notch. Joe Mele Thanks Joe ) T | @ | C Please move this discussion to a user page for Joe Mele or relevant ip number, thank you. 26 August 2005 Excuse me but where is the love??? I am a little hurt - Joe Mele It would simply be better to create a userpage and have discussions there. 26 August 2005 Deleting comments on your talk page I should point out the wikipage wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes. This page is essentially a list of rules that others expect you to abide by. The second to last rule is relevent to talk pages. While it's not the case that you can never delete material from your user page it is not considered acceptable to do so to new comments. I wouldn't worry too much about undeleting the comments you have already deleted but I would ask respectfully that you refrain from deleting any further comments (especially those critical of yourself). If you continue to delete critical comments on this page you may find that others take offense in which case they may try to get you banned. 10:18, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)" +Your edits to Zodiac Killer article have been reverted. Please remember that editors have spent a great deal of time to make articles accurate and truthful. Your edits are disruptive and do nothing to advance the aims of Wikipedia. Thank you, +Brokeback Mountain Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (talk) +Actually, if I can dig through the Wayback machine links, I think they do. It's a matter of manually searching through 200 pages, though, which I'm not going to get done quickly.— +"Wow. Somebody bolded one of his words to add emphesis, so you told him to ""calm the heck down"" and create a new section complaining about it. He isn't being hostile by bolding a word. I'm being hostile by calling you a faggot. " +Actually the format of titling appears to be DL# on the cover in the orange bar at the top only. On both the cover and the title page: Advanced Dungeons & Dragons Dragonlance Official Game Adventure - Dragons of Ice Douglas Niles They are not called modules anywhere in the official titling though this term is still used to refere to them in Dragon mag and in each other, for example Dragons of Mystery page 4. I have no problem with Aerie of the Slave Lords as this is a clear title for this series that does not need to be distinguished from anything else. Clearly Dragonlance is not available, though if the modules had not spawned numerous other products it may be the title that would have been used. Dragonlance modules is not specific enough. I am still inclined towards DL Dragonlance modules. My second choice at this time is not on your list, but very similar to some there Dragonlance modules (DL series). - +For example was the Expulsion of Germans after World War II? +jam your message up your arse wikipedia dickhead +Requested Move Requested move :Heinrich Pette Institute → – Institut is German. It is located in Hamburg. Survey Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles. Discussion Any additional comments: +" Hi , I think the has suggested above that more references can be applied, and hopefully they can show notability. If I could just point out again my comments on the AfD, it is none notable because ""Little is known of the make up of the Trustees,"" and ""It is not known how the fund is financed at the present moment."" Could these two points be addressed first, thanks, 'fenian' " +WikiProject United States|class=Stub|importance=Low|TX=Yes|TX-importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Aviation +Methinks you should review some of your own comments then +Jack Breen is a 15 year old boy who lives in the state of NSW, Australia. He is currently in year 9 at high school, and he is a qualified basketball referee and also enjoys playing basketball. +List of members of the Académie française does it by seat. User:Docu +Oswah the article claims he was born in St Petersburg and lived there until 11 -if that does not make Cantor Russian nothing else will- he was NOT German despite what that Great Beacon (?) of pop-knowledge Encyclopedia Britannica claims - the impact his Russian-ness had in having him and his work accepted by the German school is a direct cause of his later mental health issues - to deny that is fallacy and sweeps over perhaps the MOST critical aspect of his life - I do not need any source - YOU are my source - to claim he was German is wrong - period- I am a degreed Historian and Mathematician and bristle when I see such ignorant bias to claim him for Germany - he is / was and will always be Russian so call it like it is - not as the historical revisionist want to claim it - had he been any less successful I would most certainly expect German to disown him now as they did then - he is ONLY claimed by Germany because of the enormity of his work and impact it had on modern mathematics - something I in fact disagree with but get it right and PLEASE leave my CORRECT correction ... +Revision of Holocaust denial details Hi there, I had a closer look at the changes you referred to. I thank you for your attention, I went over the changes I had made and discovered a major error on my part because the Daily Express was not a tabloid until the 1970s. I will amend the details and provide citations or links where I can showing how the headline has been (mis)used. Part of the problem is that many of the comments appear on racist websites or YouTube videos associated with WWII +And THIS is why you don't list highly speculative ones! I was simply referring to the common-frickin-sense category of actors. Apparently, common sense you lack. Tch, fuck's sake. This is why people don't take Wikipedia seriously. Professionalism? Professionalism my ass. You cunts are the direct opposite of it. +Re: My Behavoir that day Yes, I know it was a bit awful. But the bot probably didn't get the jokes I made in my poem anyhow. I read Aristophanes earlier that day and was taking the piss out of the wikipedia system and taking the piss out of that dork there. I don't really care about this wikipedia anyhow. I can make another one, and change my IP address (also I use my college computer and they cannot trace the network anyhow there) so I am alright. ) Least you care ) Regards PS I probably won't do that again. just pisses me off wikipedia sometimes. +Thank you for your help. It worked. Now the article has two lovely images. +Refs in Life History section Fin, sei, and Bryde's are all baleen whales. The cited sources mentioning those species give age at physical maturity (20-25 for Bryde's, 25 for seis, and 25-30 for fin whales, iirc). Evans gives age at sexual maturity, duration of lactation and gestation, etc. for various species of baleen whale. Rommel and Reynolds give the estimated length of minkes at weaning. Go find the pages yourself. +can you... can you inf ban my account? my friend somehow found out my password +Does the blocking administrator even disagree with the tags? On acetylene my tags motivated an editor to add more references, improving the project. +THis guy is REtired - Thank God Just wanted to say, good riddens... +Vandals How can I spot if a page has been vandalised? +" We've already been through this before, ever hear of the Pokemon test? Firemind ^_^ Pokedex " +Thanks For fixing my user page and the Interdictor article. +You can find people with better grammar on Friends Reunite, but that probably doesn't apply to you as appear to be someone that doesn't have any social skills +i see you have been blocked before for reverting and that you have a history of getting out of line. time to tone it down +How am I disruptive editing? I am reversing it to when it was perfectly fine and only needs sources added. You are reversing it to where there are false quotes and false information added. If you are going to edit it do it right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Kosta was born in America, however, like most Greek Americans, he was raised by his parents, both from Greece, as a Greek, which is typical in the Greek American culture. Because of this, Kosta now has Greek citizenship, which therefore classifies him as a Greek citizen who in fact was raised as one as well. end of discussion. +The result of the bout has been changed from a KO win for Toney to a non-contest by the California State Athletic Commission! +The fact that Azeris are mixed Turkic speaking people that sprung from the Turkish invasion points to the fact that they did not just appear. They were and are in the location that was Arran that consistent of Albanians, and Iranian tribes. Furthermore, the fact that the entire area was called Arran, then for some reason was renamed Azerbaijan is another indication that Azeris were not a Turkic speaking group that just living side by side in the Caucus next to the Sakas. No one said Azeris in the north do not have differences when compared to other Iranians, in fact Iranians are a multi-ethnic, multi lingual group, much like the Kurds in the west have a different language/customs, as do Balochies in the south. What happened to Iranians in Arran intermittingly, in which the Turks invaded their tribes, and the Albanians were driven out, and imposed their language on them via Elite Dominance, does not change their original ancestry. You have again failed to give a single rationale as to where the Azeris came from, why they even appear/are part of Iran, even today, and why these ethnic groups even have a Persian culture? In all, you can concentrate on their differences, but fail to explain where did Azeris come from? It is astonishing how some choose to skip many important facts, and write pages of texts about Germanic peoples in an article about Iranian peoples. I think I’ll stop at that. +" Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. e (Talk) " +read this.. im gonna troll you forever and ever and ever, and nothings going to stop that. +"Yea, actually I am pretty lazy, that's why today I wore a shirt that said ""The top ten reasons why I procrastinate. 1) " +" More copyright problems I have just deleted IPhone OS 2 and IPhone OS 3, as they were clear copyright infringements. Also, looking at your editing hsitory, I found that at least two other articles that you created, and that have already been deleted for other reasons, also infringed copyright. In all cases, I found that you had posted text which was word-for-word the same as text in other sources which already existed before you created the Wikipedia articles in question. It is unacceptable to copy material from elsewhere, unless there is proof that the content is either in the public domain or licensed under a free license compatible with Wikipedia's terms of use. I hope you will make sure that you don't copy content from elsewhere again. The editor who uses the pseudonym """" " +well I'm going to focus on content and just leave it at that. +Keep your distance far From Abdul and Omar! 86.181.0.14 +Damn Damn, I'm a vandal and you're reverted like 50% of my edits in like 2 seconds! I might have to retire LOL! +Congress gets involved the same way as it does with most any military purchase, they control the money which is appropriated. Granted back then the various service secretaries had more lattitude than now but Congress often got involved. Needless to say that organizing and maintaining an armored division is expensive enough Congress would have to be involved. )0:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC) +i dont know, but i have heard me has also conerted to islam +Since ethnicity is hot-topic for greek editors, it shall be separate not to disrupt the whole text. +her! Poop, pee, toot, fart, gas, diareah! Zoey is poop. She stinks. I want to marry you baby! Call me! +Editing pages To anyone who reads Dmacks' talk page you will now how that there is only one person entitled to an opinion and that is Dmacks. Hopefully he wont read anything you edited as he will just change it back. He is very arrogant. +no either way just go bother someone else +" Unblock Request: Fuck you, unblock me! {{unblock|HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA UNBLOCK ME OR I WILL VANDALISE MORE!!!! It had been six years since we had graduated from college, and for the first time since graduation, all three of us were together again. From the enthusiastic hugs at the airport and then the conversation and laughter during the dinner we shared at a local restaurant on the way to my home, it was clear that while plenty of time had passed and we had kept in contact, the comfort and attraction between the three of us when all together in the same physical location was still undeniable. Having returned to my cozy, semi-secluded home in the suburbs, we all sat in the living room, sipping wine and continuing the tales of our lives. With the exceptions of the location – a house – and the presence of alcohol, it could have been any of our final two years of college together: The three of us, tight-knit friends-with-benefits, sitting and chatting and sharing a drink together. Then, Justine and Beth had been roommates while I lived in another dorm across the main quad; now, they were much-welcomed guests who had fortunately been able to clear time in their hectic schedules to come and visit me for a weekend. As I sat in the recliner and took another sip of wine, I allowed my eyes to truly linger on Justine as she told Beth about a recent situation at work. The Florida sun had certainly added a glow to Justine's skin, and may have also been responsible for the lighter shade of her shoulder-length brown hair. As when we were in college together, she wore virtually no make-up, just a thin gloss upon her lips – an enticing strawberry flavor, as I had discovered upon meeting her at the airport earlier in the evening – and red fingernails. Her red dress was indeed elegant, with a plunging sequined neckline that permitted a very welcome display of her cleavage, a display which Beth and I both certainly appreciated. The long slit up the skirt of the dress revealed that she was wearing stockings held up by a garter belt, one of its descending white straps definitely noticeable against the well-toned thigh. The red heels provided enough of a contrast for the white stockings to truly attract the eyes. Surprisingly, however, she wore hoop earrings, something she had never worn during college for fear that they would pull at her ears and widen the piercing holes more than was considered safe. The conversation turned back toward me, but a few minutes later, the two beautiful young women were again chatting primarily to each other. I took the opportunity to once again study Beth, and was equally impressed. While noticeably shorter than Justine, Beth was also paler in complexion, a testament to living in northern Canada ever since graduation and spending virtually every waking moment inside to conduct her research. As in college, Beth preferred the color black for her outfits: a somewhat-tight sweater, form-fitting slacks, and a pair of low heels. Four tiny earrings adorned each ear, plus she bore a small sparkling stud against her left nostril. Beth's black hair flowed over her shoulders and down her front, and she absently twirled several strands around a finger as she listened to Justine. It felt so good to be in their presence once again. Especially since all three of us had been in several failed relationships since graduating from college, I was thankful that I had thought to invite them to spend the weekend with me. I had absolutely no doubt that our chatter would eventually give way to intimacy, but for now, I was quite content to simply sit back in the recliner and openly admire the two stunning beauties perched upon the sofa. The intimacy began when we finally went to bed... together. I was on my back under the covers, with a very feminine head resting softly upon each shoulder. An arm wrapped around each of them, I held the two women close to me as they absently stroked my bare chest, dipped a finger into my navel, brushed my thighs through the sweatpants I typically wore to bed, caressed my stiffening manhood. My eyes closed, I reveled in their touches: inherently familiar, yet full of rediscovery due to the lengthy passage of time. No words were needed. And as their hands occasionally made contact with each other upon me, I smiled to myself in the darkness, having always enjoyed watching Beth and Justine in their own intimate encounters. But eventually, their touches slowed and ultimately ceased, their breathing falling into the regularity associated with sleep. I stayed awake a little longer, immensely enjoying the closeness with two of the people who had been most important in my life. I awoke in the morning to the scent of French Roast coffee, faint yet unmistakable. Justine was gone, clearly the one who had brewed the morning nectar, while Beth and I held each other as sh +Current thinking One line of thought is that 'paraphrenia' is basically a psychotic illness (e.g. schizophrenia). The differences (e.g. preservation of personality) are simply due to the fact that the psychosis starts later, and so the person's personality has already formed (v.s Schizophrenia which often starts early, and therefore disrupts personality development). I don't have a specific reference for this but might look for one at some point! +Why did you delete the Harry Walther article? I'm very worried about this deletion. Walther is one of the only voices preaching the truth about Jesus's message. +Trying to find official synopsis to add to the plot section +"There's a BIG difference between that stupid thing you just falsely put on my keyboard and this quote: ""It explains that there's the difference between text-only 'eBay' and the actual logo that's more like 'ebay', but also the distinction between that same lame text-only 'eBay' and how it used to be styled, which was ' 'ebaY' ''' until late 2012."" " +" Heyyy Tyler hun! ) How are you, my dear Tyler? I was begining to wonder if you had received it - glad to see you did! Seeing you drop by my talk page has cheered me a lot, so here's a small kiss to repay that joy ;) *smooch!* ♥ tell me - " +Disambiguation Page Does this need a disambiguation page? I would argue that the other Billy West is not prominent enough to cause confusion. There is not even any article linked for him, and the Primrose article is pretty minor. First, I moved this to the bottom of the page because that's where people usually expect new material to be. This way people looking will be more likely to see this question, no biggie. To answer your question; no, I don't think this really needs a disambiguation page for the same reasons that you listed. +Lol, my major issue P:)) спойт +hi. this is a place where you can leave a message for me. +Thanks for the praise. I'm taking Wikipedia a lot more seriously now than I used to. I have to admit that a few months ago I did silly things like vandalize articles. I never really didn't anything slanderous, just silly and stupid stuff. Recently, I've been doing my best to contribute positively to Wikipedia and I've even been correcting the same sort of vandalism I used to take part in. +" Reply from ColonelHenry I have been pissed this week, I admit. Why? First, last week, I get harassed by one hypocritical ""rule nazi"" editor taking things too far (SummerPhD) so when I pointed out her similar shortcomings and intransigence and said frankly ""this user is an asshole"" and explain why and state ""this is the kind of user that drives editors away from wikipedia"" I get blocked for 24-hours. I say ""asshole"" once, I get blocked. She calls me a ""dick"" over a dozen times, and gets warned. Go figure. I hate nitpicking rule nazis because they end up proving themselves to be hypocrites, and unfortunately without fool other meek fools who tend to be admins tend to side with the rule nazi. In the midst of that Daniel Case continued to plow ahead insisting on a rushed revision of ALONJ that no one else raised as a concern (so, not immediately dire) after being asked first politely and respectfully several times to ""wait until after TFA"" and he still ignored it. If someone politely asked me to wait a few days before doing a drastic edit on an article they worked on that was getting a little attention, I would...because I find it akin to telling a concert pianist to change their entire concert programme an hour before the recital. Only when I responded in anger did he pull back on the reins and realize ""hey, maybe I should wait till after TFA."" A little deference on his part would have gone a long way. I'm not averse to his edits, but seriously, after TFA would have been more than fine. I considered it insulting, and his refusal to listen to a polite request stated by both myself and the other major contributor to the article was considerably disrespectful. And then when the article I've worked on becomes TFA we get inundated with constant vandalism and petty edits that were not necessary (i.e. people like you, Kevjonesin, insisting on 19th instead of nineteenth). Is that really a necessary place to make a stand and pick a fight? Seriously, don't you have better things to do with your time? I'd rather argue over an analysis of Hegel's influence on Nietzsche's ""Will to Power"" or Hindu mysticism in Eliot's Four Quartets than bicker about things as meaningless as whether honour should be spelled -or or -our. As for why, I like ""nineteenth"" as opposed to 19th, several style guides (including Chicago/Turabian) advocates it, and growing up I was taught that all numbers under 20 should be spelled out. Whether cutting two dozen letters from an article going to 19th and 20th is going to make a difference for ""brevity's sake"" on a 40-page article, is a lame claim and frankly a waste of time for both of us. I like the aesthetic of it spelled out, it's allowed, and the option of spelling it out is a bonus in an article to avoid confusion with too many other numbers. When considering such an unnecessary subjective edit, deference should be made to style set by the editors who spent months on an article...and when nothing is wrong to it, deference is entirely warranted. That isn't ownership, it's just courtesy and good judgment. After all, if I stood in your yard while you were painting your house gray and proceeded to insist you to paint your house orange, you'd tell me to ""kick rocks."" As far as I'm concerned, this is over. Move on. I am not addressing this any further, because nonsense like this keeps me from contributing and convinces me to leave Wikipedia again, and this time for good. If Hell is other people, Wikipedia constantly proves itself to be the eighth and ninth circle. " +Al Wistert was inducted into the Eagles Honor Roll yesterday. I don't have all the details, but someone should write this in. +Wow!!!! Instantaneous response. Obviously not spending an evening with the girlfriend .... bet you're free pretty much every Saturday night too, eh fellah? +" I've changed the status of your case from ""Open"" to ""Under Investigation"" as I familiarize myself with the case... and as you probably know, this is a -very- involved case. I'm almost finished reading through all of the material and consulting with the other Advocates who were involved. Once that is finished, I'll be able to go over with you the pertinent points that I feel need to be addressed for my better understanding, and then go over what you wish to get out of Advocacy. I'll be in contact soon. אמר (/AMA) • " +" And by nailing Philippa Gregory to the wall a 1000000 times!!! Feudalist " +propfan MD-80 I read that during a period of unusually high fuel costs, MD built one -80 with propfan engines (these look like turbofans, but with a propellor attached to the rear; they are known for their effeicency). After some initial hype, no orders came, and the model (I believe it was a one-off, more of a demonstrator than anything else), was scrapped. There has been intermitent talk of using propfans on civil aircraft since then, but it has not come to anyhting. +I already did so by taking a Wikibreak, as per step 2: Disengage For A While. I note with grim certainty that Striver and his POV-pushing colleagues have done no such thing. +" Come on and others so defensive of this article, how about working toward making it a real GA article? It will require a bit of an attitudinal shift for some, but I suggest removing most of the fanzine hearsay gossip about Barrett's behaviour when he was ill would be a good place to start. I would start doing it myself but the organised ""ring-in"" resistance I encountered last time deters me from bothering. " +" Hilarious, Islander. You undo my evil, uncivil language (like it matters to anyone) but you leave the cowardly, bad-faithed and wrong accusations against me in place. Makes me feel real good about your judgement in indefblocking me. Sorta. Everyme " +" Sociology I hope I'm in the right place. I'm a newbie. I've worked quite hard at editing the badly needed ""Sociology"" page, but am having trouble with using links. Please help. Also, given the changes to content and context where I have clarified information and removed value ladden dialogue with whom do I discuss removing the: ""Clean up"" ""Editing"" and ""Tone"" warnings on the page? At present, it has been revamped, but the discipline is vast. I will add more as I progress and continue the edit as time permits. In the meantime, it would be nice for people to have a sense of confidence when reviewing the material now.Sociologist4life Check out my edit of the ""Introduction to Sociology"" in wikiversity that I created, if that helps. At the time, I used Aresthusa as my handle. Thanks!" +I fully acknowledge that I made a mistake. My apologies. +Point taken. But Keeper, you are the one who originally admonished me for getting involved in issues that I was not directly connected to. Islander and I have our own history. It looks as though, had you not responded - I'd be listening to crickets here; as Islander is sticking to his normal communication pattern. So, in that - thanks. 72.92.4.157 +Reverting Do not revert an article more than three times in 24 hours. It is against wikipedia policies, see Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule +This is my talk page for anyone who wishes to send a message. I appreciate them. +" (1) Please remain civil. You may have a personal relationship with the subject, or have personal reasons for supporting him, but taking personal offence on his behalf isn't useful to improvement of the article. (2) You keep conflating my changes with those of someone else. The use of the word ""caused"" appears to be the major source of your dudgeon, and I didn't make that change. You keep reverting all changes wholesale including changes made for reasons purely of style rather than picking out the ones which are bothering you. (3) We have no proof that the documents are ""sensitive"" or that Bradley Manning is responsible for anything at all, since there has been no legal action. You complain about BLP, but accepting claims about Bradley Manning's guilt in the matter of a serious criminal offence are an extremely serious BLP policy violation. Until the claims of Lamo and the US government have been established in a court of law, we CANNOT use the word-of-God to state their claims are true. As for the torture citation, if you read the article (and many others also easily obtainable), you will see that it's the newspaper which chose to put ""torture"" in quotation marks, not the experts they consulted. We are not interested in the editorial opinion of the newspaper, but rather the opinion of the experts whom the newspaper has consulted who clearly states that Manning's treatment amounts to torture. " +I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which are detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us. +" see the talk page. OTRS is slow indeed ). For everyone, I have a very intermittent connection at the moment and will not respond swiftly to queries. I'll try to avoid admin work meanwhile. My apologies. talk " +" I'm not. I was responding to your phrase ""locomotive superheaters vs. compounds"". " +"{{unblock | I am appealing a 48-hour block that was placed on me before I could post my response via the administrator's message board. I apologize in advance for the length of this but I believe that it's necessary to include all of these details. I wrote a summary at the end so that administrator's could get an overview if they don't have time to read the whole statement. I will be addressing the claim that I violated the 1RR rule in the second paragraph of this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzhak_Shapira According to WP:BLP, ""Biographies of living persons must be written conservatively and with regard to a subject's privacy..."" In a book written in a foreign language, with a lot of jargon, there are often competing translations/interpretations. And a book written in such a hotspot is sure to generate numerous quotes, misquotes, dubious translation and out-of-context statements. As per WP:BLP I think it stands to reason that a more conservative and less sensationalist translation be used, and for the same reason, the quotes should not be taken out of the context that the book uses them in. With than in mind on the 18th of February, I improved certain parts of the paragraph in question in order to make to make it more compatible with WP:BLP based on this source. user:Zero0000 - responded to one of my edits by stating that [en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yitzchak_Ginsburgh&diff;=538816167&oldid;=538810305 I ""can't read.""] And in what seemed to be extremely inappropriate comment for a Wikipedia administrator, told me in as many words to get off Wikipedia.""Take a break"" I didn't take nicely to being told that by an administrator and thus began a heated series of exchanges during which I was told by said individual that I had ""behavioral problems."" Said individual also decided to respond to my comments by invoking what seemed to me to intimidation tactics ""I started to write a complaint against you"" (why do I need to know that? He can let me know when he posts it) and then later responding to another edit he didn't like by saying that ""it was on my charge sheet."" Now the reason I am writing about the behavior of said individual is to give some context or the 1RR issue: After posting my version of the paragraph, user:Zero0000 subsequently changed it to this. I will post only the first few words of his statement and the source: Source: ""There is a reason to kill babies [on the enemy side""] user:Zero0000: [""Babies [on the enemy side may be killed .""] After those first few words, user:Zero0000 continues quoting the rest of the paragraph. Now at best this is a serious distortion. And when you consider that article is dealing with a scholarly work which contains hundreds of sometimes competing, sometimes contradictory sources, rationales, theories, proposals, and ideas; many of which are subsequently discounted, limited in scope, or just tossed by the wayside, the disparity the statement ""may be done"" and ""there is a reason"" is even greater. Aside from the distortion mentioned above, in contradiction to WP:BLP user:Zero0000 also opted for a particularly liberal out-of-context translation. Why did user:Zero0000 replace my edit with his own. His statement: (prefer source with an actual quotation) As I showed above, he didn't use an actual quotation. Furthermore, after seeing his comment, I searched but wasn't able to find any Wikipedia reference to a such a preference, leading me to believe that he was intent on just superimposing his own WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT on me without explanation. His actions above combined with the general hostility cited above led me to be believe that this was another front in the multi-pronged campaign of intimidation that he was engaging in (i.e. encouraging me ""take a break"").NEWLIN +" I think the possibility of a corrupt core of admins is a problem worth asking candidates on. So if anybody else posted this exact question there wouldn't be a problem with it? Particularly, I imagine, if it were a well respected admin with an impeccable record positing it? I read each of the candidates statements, and used that to judge if this question would be useful, look at the time between asking the candidates questions. Also look at the ""ignore all evidence"" question, this occurred to me as I was going along and it must be regarded as a general behavioural question when linked to the ""5 days"" question, plus this shows it was not a ""spam"" question to all candidates, I did pay attention to their statements. This is the question I posed to select candidates. What general concerns do you think are raised by the 5 days of silence from the community's admins in this ANI? Are there any other general concerns which arise from the ANI? Do these quotes; ameliorate, add to or amplify concerns? Do you agree with the substance of the Jehochman quotes? If an essay WP:IGNORE ALL THE EVIDENCE were written, what concerns would be behind it, and what could be done about them? If you can point me to another ANI where lies and deceit by two admins within an ANI were ignored by the other admins in attendance for somewhere close to 5 days, then I will ask exactly the same question of those select candidates, substituting this with that example. Would that be acceptable? Have you seen such examples of systemic corruption before? Or is this the only one? Of course to answer that you would also have to answer; can you say in all honesty that you think Ruslik did not lie in this ANI? If you choose not to answer... is it because you believe it is the moral thing to do, or because of possible intimidation or repercussions on your good self? " +Adam Bostick Was the Adam Bostick image tagged for fair use? If so, for how long? +The article is NOT about the afterlife. The afterlife includes several parts: life in the grave, the day of judgement and then life in paradise or hell. This article is only a survey of the Muslim narrative of the Day of Judgement, not an article about the afterlife in general. +" Thanks for your work on this ... by the by, when you revised your closure remarks, you said you moved it to ""California Adventure"" instead of to ""Disney California Adventure"", as you did and as was the consensus in the discussion. Minor detail, I know. I'm tempted to fix it myself but was afraid I'd be stepping on toes. AU93 " +Inaccurate information Removed a section which claimed that Denning's novel Pages of Pain inspired the Planescape: Torment game, which is definitely not the case. Both have an amnesiac protagonist and that's about it. The novel is about the Lady of Pain and her background, whilst the computer game has very little to do with the Lady of Pain at all. Chris Avellone and none of the other Torment writers have mentioned the book as an influence at all. +|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here: I was unfairly blocked by a groupf of provocateurs +Cease and desist You must refrain from re-adding vile language to my talk page from hostile editors. To not follow my request, is to indulge the trollish remarks. If you delete this too, then you are effectively one-sided and bigoted. Please leave me alone and don't take sides. Don't vandalise my talk page with nasty comments. I ask nicely. +" Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! melmac " +I asked him for help. He could help. Because another person blocked me for an unknown reason68.100.166.227 +Dennis, I have not been posting as an IP. Your statement is again the misleading and I think you are well aware of that since I have explained exactly what happened. A number of times going back many weeks I have been logged out of WP for no reason known to me. I have then logged in and identified myself with the comments written as an IP. I feel threatened by your writing that you can find my hometown using my IP. Is that what you intend? +" The phrase ""became critical"" was an older version. The current version does not have that specific phrase. " +, 6 January 2008 (UTC) That is indeed, fairly precisely, the position of some monarchists, as well as reasoning of some jurists and scholars, to this matter. Which then means that it would be POV to erase Carlos Patrick from the article, as there are at least as good reasons for his legitimacy as heir as to those of the other Hohenzollern line. 14:56 +" See in my userpage the Articles I've created and Articles I will fight to take them into GA sections. [zootalk] " +" Response to AN/I The edit in question is a reference to an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia I was watching at the time. I get that it's probably not the best use of a user page, but I honestly don't really care that much about what's on my user page; I'm here to edit the wiki. I can also acknowledge that saying ""real girls have vaginas"" could be seen as hurtful or intimidating to other users, which is in no way my intent. I don't have any issues changing my user page if it means moving on from all this debate and getting back to editing. _friend " +|rationale= I want to get rid of my account but am currently blocked from editing my user page so I thought the talk page would be the next best thing +This week's issue of Music Week has their surnames down as Stephens and Meads. +" Kim Fowley Hello, again! I noticed you edited the Kim Fowley page a while back, and was wondering if you had any book/source suggestions about him. I wrote an article about his song ""The Trip"" not too long ago, but it's a little too brief for me to be satisfied with it. Any help, as always, is greatly appreciated. " +I've read your reply to Vartan's talkpage, I don't think there need be any more evidences that Ankaram, Laciner and Falcon are all the same user. The one disapear and one reapear just after is just more than a coincidences, that each add links to his journal is more than just coincidences, that each have contributions covered in his journal is just more than coincidences. That Falcon has the same prejudicial beliefs as Laciner is also not a coincidences at all. If you are attempting to show us that there is nothing surprising that three different users contribute in the same articles where nearly no one else has contributed and that they all registered just after the other has left, than, I think it is failed. Probabilisticly, when adding all the elements, there can be no rational doubt that they are all the same person. Quebec Science is also something I read, which is more notable, but it doesn't have any entry in Wikipedia, neither has its president or what have you, his page. and I'm sure he does give lectures around the world too. (ix) +instead led FAN eastwards onto the Plain of Jars. +Yes, I'm well aware of that some gaters claim that gamergate is a consumer revolt, but my reading of Tutelary's comment (especially given that this is a discussion of whether or not gamergate can even be properly called a 'movement') was that these sources supported the idea that gamergate is a consumer revolt, when in fact most of them do the opposite, treating the claim with suspicion. +If you want to make your mark on Wikipedia by adding entries for Conservative political hacks, you could more usefully produce an article on someone a bit more notable, such as Sir Simon Milton. +Chill out people Look don't get too stiff! The least that can be done is have Don Cheadle 2nd, Ben Kingsley 3rd, and Gwyneth Paltrow 4th so that nobody has to irritate eachother. After all this is going to be an awesome movie, right? +Good Information! Going for the most accurate and complete encyclopedic content possible, should we then create a different article for the Gong Baotian and Xie Pieqi styles? Rather than dilute the style information of each style, my thought is that we should have a separate article for each subsystem that varies significantly from the norm. Perhaps one called 'Xie Pieqi Line Yin Style Baguazhang' and another 'Gong Baotian Line Yin Style Baguazhang'. For each style with significant amounts of content as well as verifiable sources, splits from the main article seem to make sense to me. +" Two points. They're going to a level of detail far beyond summary. If someone wants to learn about the structure of UNATCO (for example) not only would Eidos like to sell you a game (they could use the money), there are many, many fansites who can speculate, offer analysis, compare Deus Ex to other works, and do all sorts of things Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia both can't and shouldn't. As for the lists of various agents - I may later regret suggesting this - how would you feel about a ""Trivial/Generic characters in Deus Ex"" article, covering the robots, the generic MIBs, the soldiers, and so on? I'm not really happy about it, but it seems like a logical place to dump this sort of thing. - (conspire | past ops) " +Why even have the fucking talk pages if we can't comment on other users? +"(Replace ""Something"" with the exact page link) " +Health Issues? Health issues are keeping you away? What, are you sick to your stomach because I exposed your corruption? +" Did you read the title before making that comment? I changed it to something more suitable. Your always welcome to remove personal attacks at my talkpage Bwilkins, always. ★★★★ " +Nice snark, have fun being 400 lbs and living on Wikipedia. http://www.mycarpro.org/Used-Car-Dealer/Elliot-Hummel-Automotive-LLC/ That's her dad. N277 N Brandenburg Ave Merrill, Wisconsin that's where her parents live +July 2013 (UTC) Indeed, seems classic anti-gentile jewish censorship.in this case of wiki media. See C.A.M.E.R.A campaign on wiki. In short it should be added as consensus 77.53.219.2 04:30, 27 +" The titles need not show that the characters are related, all about this is in the articles. You see, the nature of fiction is that it's not necessarily coherent. Since this article is not about Malcolm Wilkerson in the first episode of the show ""Malcolm in the Middle"" but about the character throughout the show, it is indeed inaccurate to use a name for the character that was only used for the pilot episode. For the entire rest of the seven season run, the character's name was only ""Malcolm"". This is not a question of beauty or taste, but of plain accuracy. A title like ""Malcolm (XXX)"" my appear clumsy, but Wilkerson is not an alternative. In my opinion. If can't build consensus on this between the two of us, I suggest asking for additional input at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions, since I didn't find anything in the guidelines for a specific case like this (although I'm fairly sure the fact that the character's name was ""Wilkerson"" only during the first of 151 episodes of the show means that calling the character ""Wilkerson"", esp. in the title, is inaccurate). —'''''' " +LOL. You are a moron. +Howard was the highest taxing govt in Australia's history, Labor then reduced the income tax rate three times since, all he did in terms of economic reform was a GST. He preferred to play the social conservative while pretending that everything we have around us, markets, the general direction of IR, taxation, etc etc, is a product of Labor which the conservative have always tried to claim the later credit for. Oh, and in modern times, slash and burn health/education/social/etc services to bring the budget back in to the black. Even though Menzies never had a budget surplus. I'd rather our money spent on us to support Australians, not held in a surplus gathering dust for no good reason - it's our money. +go vandercken!! go!! wikipedia needs you besides why are you waisting your time talking in here instead of writing an article? and why do you have a user page full of userboxes are @!$%?*# or what ? +Better not to do so unless your school is a leader in the field. Even then WP:COI would suggest that you let someone else do it. +Cut Yo Jibbah Jabbah And Yo Doggy Dog Hair !! Ur Wierdddd Cut Your Doggy Hair You Tramp You Look Like Hagrid GET A LIFE.. !! +, and still paraphrase it extremely closely in addition +" Seems reasonable to me. Since the book itself is frequently referred to as ""Dianetics"", any wording that makes the distinction clear seems like a good thing to me. (talk) " +" Sorry! Meant to say ""Go fuck yourself you Asperger's riddled freak for accusing me of destructive edits I had nothing to do with.""" +FUck you you god damn mother fuckin son of a bitch stop being a stupid ass shithead and be fuckin cool for once +JFBurton User Page Your not an administrator and stop acting like you are one. People add stuff to my user page all the time. Grow Up. +Typo: Gotam In the fourth paragraph of the Plot section Gotham is spelled 'Gotam', I wanted to do a quick edit but the article is locked. +" I see that this debate has in any case been pre-empted by User:Kotniski who has created and populated the "":Category:Constituent countries of the United Kingdom"". In my opinion this is unacceptable as 1) the debate is still in progress, indeed it has barely begun, and 2) the new category name has the rejected term ""constituent countries"" and is therefore contrary to a decision reached after a long discussion and contradicts the main article's name (Countries of the United Kingdom) and the term found in most other relevant articles. Personally, I don't see why Wales et al should not be categoried as 'European countries'. I am certainly against this unilateral reversion to a contentious and rarely used term that has been rejected here. This new category is not acceptable and a consensus decision would also be needed for the proper and logical alternative, i.e. 'Countries of the United Kingdom', if the need for it is proven and accepted. " +Amazingly, your sarcastic bullshit and superior attitude have inspired me to stop contributing to Wikipedia entirely. I've already deleted all the source code for the patch I'd been developing for the project (yes, I'm a developer) and I hope you feel all good about yourself with your smug attitude. Douche. All the admins here (with a few exceptions) should be strung up and ridiculed by people who actually have a life. +Proposed merge with Why (4Minute song) This article is a track listing and charts, with no actual information about the songs. It has been this way since its creation in 2011. WP:NSONG requires more than that for a song to have an article, even if it's notable. Wikipedia guidelines recommend merging such articles to their relevant albums, so let's do that. +(oh, and I almost forgot start uploading pictures too!) +What do you mean it is hardly true I have proved without a shadow of a doubt that during the war the axis hade many times more raw materieals. That is abosolut fact and can been show in the graphs that i have made. Also during the war As i have so cleary said in the proposal that i have made the Soviet Unnion lost alot of area with raw materials and the axis gained them. If you do not know that The Axis hade and produced many times more raw materials then the Soviets then PROVE it because I have proven with real sources that the axis hade more. ( ) Also +REDIRECT Talk:Cape May – Lewes Ferry +The new York times policy to suppress news of the Holcaust +Regarding you being a homosexual You are clearly a homosexual. I think you should leave normal society and go and live in a sewer with all the other homosexuals. You are clearly not normal. If you persist with reporting me for abusing you, I will insert a large garden gnome into you. And stay off the Dublin Airport article. It's my territory. If I say Delta serve Orlando from Dublin, then they do. Don't send me fucking patronising messages again. Fucking freak!!! +ALSO-what of this Thomas Jefferson had it reprinted in the Pennsylvania Gazette??? Is that s'posed to be FRANKLIN (who had something to do with the PA Gazette while Jefferson DIDN'T AND b/c she was going to dedicate her 2nd proposed volume to Franklin. +Fuck off Stop vandalising stuff, thanks +You're a moron! It's F U C K F U C K F U C K A D U C K , S C R E W A K A N G A R O O , 6 9 A P O R C U P I N E , O R G Y A T T H E Z O O . +Hey Dinoguy. I have a proposel that would like to put out because I feel it is of great importance, and more accurate wise. mcelite +23:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) +There are places for debates. This entry is not one of them. +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Block of 88.202.62.59 lifted - proxy access no longer working Request handled by: '''''' (Talk) Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request." +" Wow...doesn't really sound like a guy who should be spending his valuable time messing around with other people's work on Wikipedia. Yet for dramatic effect, he has time to list each and every topic on his test. Total drama queen. I have seen admins refer to complaints of users as ""whining"" many times so I will assume that I am free to call the above post by Islander I bit whiney, in fact very (pathetically) whiney. I hold a masters in science degree and I do not recall whining about the course work, exams etc to others - esp. to those whom I don't even know. On top of that, within the confines of a purely voluntary project - grew up! and grow a pair! I mean really. WTF? Islander, you said I should count myself ""warned"" - I think you know what to count yourself. No, a block wouldn't surprise me at all. It would be a typical admin knee-jerk response." +you people are pretty overzealous with this whole free thing. get a fucking life, you fucking niggers !!!23 16!!! +Crossmr I altered +t PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT!he +I confirmed with JREF that polygraphs and polygraph tests are eligible for the ONE MILLION DOLLARS. Please write to James Randi and ask yourself via randi@randi.org and you will get it from the horse's mouth himself, so to speak. Polygraphs are not paranormal, but they are useless, worthless, and pseudoscience- and covered by the Randi Challenge. February 28th., +2008 Gregorian Calendar +" A kitten for you! Thank you for your support. ) " +Ideas, ideas Hey, how's it goin' Ginkgo100? I had a couple ideas I wanted to bounce off another editor to see what they thought: you’re the editor. Here's what’s going on in my head: First; I was looking at the Bill Ritter (politician) article a little while ago and thinking it was a little dull. You scored that good shot of Ritter at the CDC, and that's about all the color we've got. So, I stopped by Ritter's campaign site (http://www.ritterforgovernor.com) and found a great screenshot off KUSA of the latest poll numbers (drop by and take a look if you can). I thought maybe this might be worth uploading (if applicable; didn't check yet) and using in the Ritter article and Colorado gubernatorial election, 2006. What do you think? In a related thought, I stumbled upon the video of the Ritter/Beauprez debates from Aug. 11 (Here's a link ). Other articles I've read have contained video, but this one might be a little to long (any thoughts?) and may not be material appropriate or applicable to upload onto Wikipedia. Second, I'm going to plunge into a clean-up effort that looks a little challenging over at National Western Stock Show (take a look and you'll see what I mean). If you can, and you like what's one of my favorite events in Denver, drop by the article and help me out a little. Thanks for the help; I've written a lot here, my apologies. See ya' around, have a good one. +" When contributing in future, please try not to create pages you're personally involved in. As the policy says; ""Wikipedia is not for things made up one afternoon"". If it isn't a notable project, which you should've been able to see that this isn't, it shouldn't be included. lds " +yep, he doesn't stop talking crap!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111oneoneoneone +" You and Your Uncivil Friends Refuted Your Uncivil Friends Refuted Or were you saying something to the over 300 people who've downloaded this refutation of you're lies?: http://www.mininova.org/tor/1264745 And so that everyone can see part of it here: JoshuaZ said: ""Starfire, as I tried to explain to you Wikipedia cares about reliable sources and verifiability, not truth. Now, if you read that guideline, you may understand why in general AIG and many of the other sources you used are not reliable sources."" Hey JoshuaZ the liar, where does Wikipedia's policy say that AnswersInGensis.org is not a reliable source? Where JoshuaZ the vandal and liar? Show us. So you think saying, ""Now"" is scientific evidence that you are a wise and intelligent teller of the truth or that you know what a reliable and verifiable source is? JoshuaZ, where does Wikipedia's policy say that the Jacob Sheep Association = a reliable and verifiable source that Jacob Sheep are biologically primitive you hypocrite? Explain that hypocrite who personally attacked Starfire777 using lies. Show your references JoshuaZ. Saying, ""Now"" is not a reference that your accusations are true are they? Why can't you make sense Joshua? Again, where did those verses prophecy anything? Do these look like prophecies JoshuaZ?: Joshua also said: ""In this case, they did have sources, so you have even less of an argument."" Wrong JoshuaZ. Simply citing sources as you yourself said does not make the source valid. It must be substantiated and verifiable. Why do you conveniently forget that you smug babbling hypocrite? Your later comments don't merit much of a response, but I wThen he said: ""ill simply note that accusing people of bigotry, bias, hypocrisy, irrationality and trolling makes my earlier comment about not using ""Darwinist"" as a slur somewhat irrelevant;"" Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you said is true is true because you said so. So much for references eh? All you have to do is accuse and it makes you right, right hypocrite? See how you go round and round in circles using circular reasoning? ""if your earlier comment toed the line, the one above crosses it."" Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you say is true because you said so. Science! ""I suggest you calm down"" I suggest you not use sarcastic insults like that, ok hypocrite? You're implying that the Starfire777 is ill-tempered merely because he points out that you are hypocrite and uses logic to do so (as well as verifiable references on Answersingenesis.com which you lied about not being reliable and being against Wikipedia's rules to cite), ok liar? I suggest you also not command a Christian to follow your moral standards over Christ's, over God's. He is a Christian don't ya know? Are you now God to tell him how to feel and think? I suggest you read this verse and take it to heart which millions of Christians know very well so that you learn how not to offend them again: ""Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil."" - Ephesians 4:26-27 Last time I checked JoshuaZ, neither your nor Wikipedia's rules superceded God's. ""and read the relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines while you wait for your block to expire."" Oh the old ""you need to read it but I don't"" and ""you sit and think while your grounded young man"" insults. What an arrogant, childish hypocrite you are. I suggest that you stop pretending that whatever you say is true merely because you said it, and again, learn what Starfire777 properly told you to learn. I'll enhance the list for you: Reference, evidence, truth, reality, lie, bigot, hypocrite, fallacy, circular reasoning, troll, stalking, harassment, insults, hatred, and love. And Joshua also said: ""This is in addition to issues of original research in regard to Biblical prophecies and other issues on the Charles Darwin page."" Wow you sure like to weasel-word: ""other issues""? What are you references for this vague ""other issues"" JoshuaZ the Policy Master of Wikpedia? And Joshua, who said anything about prophecies? Where did Starfire777 say anothing about prophecies? No JoshuaZ the wannabe scholar, he said ""predicted"" in the same way that science can be used to predict the outcome of an experiment. If your lazy-brained truth-careless self had been paying attention to what he said CARE FULL Y you might have noticed that the verses were using PAST TENSE JOSHUA, not FUTURE TENSE JOSHUA. If you are unable to tell the difference between past tense and futur +Nor, oddly a dictatorship where lonesome boys get off on meaningless power trips. ColScott +Good idea. Let's continue the discussion at Talk:György Paál. +" Replaceable fair use Image:Frex denver.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Frex denver.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +" Perhaps I seem to be repeating myself as you are repeatedly ignoring what I'm writing. The tables are unclear as the order of the product is unclear from them. E.g. the top-right corner of the first table is e6. But does that mean e1 × e7 = e6 or e7 × e1 = e6 ? It would not matter if the product is commutative but as it's not the tables are ambiguous. That is why tables are a very poor way to show the product, and probably why none of the sources use them. And again please read MOS:LEAD in paticular the section on providing an accessible overview. Or look at the articles already mentioned, Special relativity and Cross product. Or one you are familiar with, Pythagorean theorem. Or a similarly advanced article to this one (and a featured article), Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector. There should be little or no maths in the introduction: perhaps a statement of the product, but nothing else. Certainly not the page of detailed mathematical working and argument that there is now.wordsdeeds " +" Is this map accurate? = I see some problems with this map: 1- It seems to me that this map only shows the very first homo-sapiens immigrations, not the further ones... 1a- For example, regarding New Zealand, this map shows the islands being occupied by melanesian peoples that I suppose to be the morioris, while we know the maoris (the ones who come after the morioris and decimated them) were actually Polinesian... 1b- Europe is shown being occupied by settlers from Anatolia, those were the certainly the Paleo-Europeans... This map does not show the further occupation of Europe by the Indo-Europeans who originated in the Caspian Basin, migrated to Europe and pushed the Paleoeuropeans westards and southwards. 1c- The Brazilian Amerindians are not of Colombian ancestry, they are either of Caribbean origin (the Caribs and Arawaks) or of Paraguayan-Northern-Argentine origin (the Tupi-Guaranis). The bulk of the Amerindians who were in Brazil about the time of the arrival of the Portuguese were these Tupi-Guaranis. They came from Paraguay and spread all over the Brazilian coast till the valley of the Amazon River. When you show a map where Brazilian Amerindians are all coming from Colombia, you are showing a totally contradictory information. 1d- The Dravidians reached India from Ethiopia to Yemen, from Yemen to Oman, from Oman to Southeast Iran, from Southeast Iran to the Valley of Indus. What is shown on that map is that the route of the occupation of India by the Indo-Europeans (from Iran through Bactria). 1e- The hipothesis of ancient waves of Paleoeuroepan settling in the eastern coast of North America is ignored, while some geneticists have found evidences of that due to the existance of the Mithocondrial gene ""X"" (""Xenia"") among North-American Native Americans. 1f- This map also seems to ignore the Australoid migrations to South America, some people claim that the Australoids have reached South America before the Mongoloids due to some archeological findings in Brazil. Anyways, I believe it should be explained that the migrations of the homo-sapiens show on that map are only the first, the early migrations, and the route of their early settling in India should be corrected. Also, I would suggest a second map, showing further homo-sapiens migrations (now including the Maori migration from Polinesia, the correct migrations in South America and the settling of the Indo-Europeans in Europe. 189.25.2.194 R. Alberto" +" Bold text'Italic text[[[Link title] [[Media:Media:Example.ogg#REDIRECT [[Insert text]]]] ]]'''" +" Stop with the false unblock notices Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block. Gespräch Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?! I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days. Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block. Gespräch 3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?! Stop with the false unblock notices Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block. Gespräch Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?! I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days. Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block. Gespräch 3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?! Stop with the false unblock notices Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block. Gespräch Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?! I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days. Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block. Gespräch 3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?! Stop with the false unblock notices Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block. Gespräch Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?! I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days. Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block. Gespräch 3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?! Stop with the false unblock notices Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block. Gespräch Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?! I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days. Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block. Gespräch 3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?! Stop with the false unblock notices Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block. [[User:Momu +There are no blog posts or forum threads. Look properly: http://www.lehigh.edu/~infrk/2011.08.article.html - this is one is Lehigh University website http://www4.lehigh.edu/news/newsarticle.aspx?Channel=%2FChannels%2FNews%3A+2007&WorkflowItemID;=0bed2560-462b-4bd9-b834-4b5a1e91cc54 - this is one too is Lehigh University website http://www.structuremag.org/article.aspx?articleID=1211 - this one is structural magazine website https://ialcce2012.boku.ac.at/keynote_details.php?profile=5 - this is also another univeristy website. http://www.constructionweekonline.com/article-9180-top-10-worlds-tallest-steel-buildings/#.UwHewZgRTCM These are not questionable sources. These are proper websites written by professionals. So please see them properly 58.97.168.109 13:45, 20 February 2014 +I removed the tag, as there is absolutely no evidence of a problem. A citation is of course not copyright infringement. Ichibani tc +It's not about some obscure song. Rather, it's about a very famous song that purportedly was written about her. That's more than trivia. It's a part of her life that she has talked about on many occasions. +REDIRECT Talk:Guillermo García López +" Thanks The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Thank you for cleaning up my (and others) user pages! Your vandalism hunting is greatly appreciated. '''' (talk|contribs)'' " +" Still, however inappropriate Coffee's blocks were, we wouldn't want him doing something to himself in RL if he's encountering issues as claimed in his edit page space.. I know I wouldn't want to be responsible for that sort of thing, and you never know with some people.♦ " +DIREKTOR, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was a complete different state than Serbia and Montenegro. It wasn't like Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and Kingdom of Yugoslavia, or Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia and Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In 2003, after the adoption of the Constitutional Charter, whole system of government was changed. Even the position of Prime Minister was abolished, and merged with the position of President. Those two countries realy need a separate articles. +"::::::Even the claim of ""essentially segregated lives"" is bogus. Of course lives aren't 100% integrated, since these are two different cultures, with different customs and languages. But what separation exists is purely voluntary - some Arabs prefer to live in an Arab town/village, and that's understandable. Most Arabs send their kids to Arab school - so they can study in Arabic. However, some send their kid to a Hebrew speaking school - I had an Arab classmate, for instance (whose father was a department head in the city hospital, by the way). Many Arabs live in towns with a Jewish majority, and there's no law against that, and no one prevents them from doing so. Several cities in Israel have substantially mixed populations, including Jerusalem, Haifa, Jaffa, Lod, Ramle, Beer Sheva and others. There's no segregation, and no separation. " +" The book ""Die Nemesis von Potsdam"" has 47 pages of bibliography archives, demographic studies, official publications of the U.S., Great Britain, France, Switzerland, Poland, etc. besides secondary literature. These sources are tken into account in some 1000 footnotes in the book, and brought up to date in the 14th revised and enlarged edition, which you can borrow from any library. As far as German statistics on the deaths that resulted from the evacuation/flight/expulsion of the Germans, the figure of 2 million deaths is considered to be on the low side of the spectrum. As you may know, the German Red Cross, ""Statistisches Bundesamt"", ""Heimatortskarteien"", ""Gesamterhebung"" and other professional, not amateur institutions carried out careful demographic studies, especially in connection with the search for missing persons. This work was carried out over many years, and the results were always the same between 2 and 3 million missing and dead. The fact that Poland was a victim of aggression and war crimes by both Germany and the Soviet Union does not justify or legalize the crimes committed against East Prussian farmers, Silesian coal miners, factory workers and their families. JvA" +EPIC FAIL! EPIC FAIL EPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAIL +" Trabecula I am not exactly sure of your use of the word ""trabecula"", which can be a microscopic feature of solid looking bones. " +TLTS Hey there! I find that you reverted few edits of mine. One being the addition of this image. Please do not change it back to the image you uploaded because it has a higher resolution. As far as the addition of DVD release dates is concerned, I added the regions only after I saw that various episode lists feature all the 3 regions. Anyway I would like your input and hopewe can continue to better the episode list. Do care to leave a talkback! +" Regrettably, I have to agree about the Gameplay section. It comes off more like an academic discourse on the incorporation of multiple characters and changes from previous franchise entries in video games, using Mother 3 as an example, than a proper encyclopedic entry. I won't quickfail just for this, but I do want it fixed before I'll pass. I'd prefer the section to be rewritten entirely, but some glaring points follow: ""Mother 3 is presented in eight chapters with rotating player-characters including the protagonist's ""cowboy father"", the ""family dog"", an ""inept thief"", and ""abused monkey"""" - So is the protagonist not playable? How large is the party? Why are these descriptions in quotes? - it suggests equivocation in your understanding of the characters. Actually, why isn't the protagonist named in this section? Again, I completely understand the desire to approach this from an out-of-universe perspective, but only to the point where the prose doesn't trip over its own detachment. ""Mother 3 begins with naming the members of the player-character's family along with questions of the player's favorite food and ""thing"",[3] and opens to a ""pastoral forest village"" soon interrupted by a forest fire and the Pig Mask Army, who impose police state-like conditions on the village.[2] With the fire's outbreak, the father ventures out to protect his family (twin sons Lucas and Claus and wife Hinawa), but the rest of the world is eventually implicated in the plot.[1] They set out to take down the Pig Mask Army.[4] Lucas, the game's hero, does not become prominent until the fourth chapter. The game features a lighthearted plot, with enemies like ""partying ghosts"" and ""talking rope snakes"".[5] Porky, a character from EarthBound, appears as the leader of the Pig Mask Army and is the game's main antagonist. In addition, other EarthBound characters, such as Dr. Andonuts and Mr. Saturn, also appear."" - Why isn't this stuff in Plot? The cast of characters does need to be introduced better, but jamming plot details into Gameplay isn't the way to do that. The second paragraph is better; it's more in line with what I expect from a GA gameplay section. At least, it's good until ""Apart from this rhythm and combo mechanic, the battle system is similar to that of its predecessor."" What's the predecessor's battle system like? Remember, not everyone reading this has played EarthBound. ""There is no need to grind for experience and it has no random battles"" - First of all, this should start off with a ""However"" or something of the like as its predecessor does have those things. The information is also lacking, though - why isn't there a need to grind for experience? I think of this as one of the central, love-it-or-hate-it JRPG mechanics, and I'm curious as to how the genre might work without it. Imagine reading a Pokémon game article that simply states that you can change your party as needed (which is unusual for a JRPG) without giving a brief overview of how the PC and Day Care systems work - that's how I feel reading this. "" and lets the player see their magic ""PSI power"" abilities"" - Viewing your abilities probably isn't a necessary gameplay detail, but why isn't there anything on the abilities themselves and their use in battle? And do they have uses outside battle, like HMs, Rock Smash, Secret Power, and Softboiled do in Pokémon? ""While Mother 3's music is both similar in tone to its predecessors and completely new, it features similar sound effects."" - By ""completely new"" do you mean it isn't recycled wholesale, or that the style is somehow new? Also, this bit probably doesn't belong in Gameplay. If you're up to rewriting this, which I encourage - especially if you're shooting for FA - I'd recommend a structure like the following: Paragraph 1: It's a top-down JRPG, there's an overworld, you explore towns with your team of characters, yada yada yada. Paragraph 2: There are battles, they're not random (with an explanation of the conditions under which you do encounter battles - is it like in Pokémon Colosseum where you only fight other Trainers, or like in Dragon Ball Z: Buu's Fury where you can see the enemies on the overworld before fighting them?), this is how the battle system works, this is how items work, this is how experience points/leveling work (again, how is this the case without grinding? Or is a different system used entirely?). Paragraph 3: Your team consists of such-and-such a number of characters, they change with different events in the story, characters do/don't return once they leave, here are examples of the characters and how they differ in and out of battle. Stuff like items and saving (can you save anywhere?) - work in wherever you want; I'm not picky. 21:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC +" The biggest conflict of interest is that she has had a personal email relationship and she is angry about something else. For diffs on an earlier dispute, I would have to get them from her talk page, around middle of March of this year. I will get you diffs from my talk page now. Please wait.Malke2010 " +The new article is already complete. I'm just adding a few finishing touches/citations. It can be viewed on my talk page. +Yes I now provided some information on the image. Thanks. +If you have research questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Reference desk. Thanks, +Got it. I do appreciate that there those such as yourself guarding Wiki's integrity. +Additions of http://.smplace.com/ Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. +": I understand quite well the situation in Albanian because it occurs also in my native Romanian and other Balkan languages (e.g. in Romanian ""great man"" is usually omul mare or un om mare, but it also can be marele om). It is related to compound names and nouns, and actually you brought it up when you started lecturing on Albanian ""structures"" in a post-scriptum. All your examples come from modern Albanian, not from Proto-Albanian whatever language it was. I can add some etymologies such as the one Orel provided for thënukël = ""dogberry"", from earlier *thënubël < PAlb. *tsunu-abōla, cf. Lith. šúnobuolas, Dacian kinouboila (= ""dog's apple""). In what you quoted so far, Hamp did not claim anything about Proto-Albanian compound nouns or syntax. Please provide relevant bibliography, otherwise I don't see why should we be dismissive of other scholars' theories. Orel, Georgiev and many others are also linguists. " +" Oppose Please source that there is ""consensus that Game 162 amounts to one of the best days in MLB history"". Nothing has changed to sway my opinion on this. –   " +2011 (UTC) Corrected. 24.15.117.78 19:38, 20 November +Look, a lenghty exchange of opinions can be a nice thing, but since you two have now discussed the rough equivalent of 3-4 pages, this discussion is obviously stalled. Let me try to sum up what I think about this topic: Please be aware that WP:ATT (like any other WP policy) isn’t written in stone, and SaltyBoatr's extremely literal interpretation of one sentence of this policy is most likely not what it was meant to say. every article published in Foreign Affairs is reviewed by other scientists, which is much more than you could say for any “reliable” newspaper or just about every university publication. That should be enough to make sure WP:ATT isn’t a good reason to ban them. I have to agree with Ultramarine: if you use your interpretation of WP:ATT consequently, there’s only a handful of WP-articles that would survive the necessary mass-deletion of references. (What’s more, I think it would be some pretty bad ones, those that rely entirely on newspaper articles) Finally: There really is no good reason why articles that I could use in every Political Science paper and any scientific article shouldn’t be enough for Wikipedia. - +I strongly agree! Episode 68 should be part of the Commander Red Saga since that episode concludes the Red Ribbon Army story. Why is that episode in the Fortuneteller Baba Saga anyway? That episode doesn't even feature nor mention Fortuneteller Baba. 120.28.178.93 +"== Your edit to Ghost. == [[subst:test1|Ghost}} | Talk | " +screw you why dont you stick it up your fucking ass than lick it out, block it i dont give a shit you fucking bastard, suck my fucking BALLLLLSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +" 2007 (UTC) Hi. 1.) I must've mistakenly thought Ian was an original member b/c he's always viewed as the band's definitive axeman... 2.) Yeah, I almost bought an Akai Headrush looper a few years ago because of its notorious role in Don Cab's one-guitarist recordings. I settled on a Boss Loop Station instead, rather than a Headrush or Boomerang, due to those two's reliability & price issues, respectively. Check out Hovercraft, Southpacific, & Auburn Lull if you're into this kind of hallucinitory guitar looping. I thought Don Cab's new lineup was incredible when I saw them in '04, but I skipped their ""classic"" lineup in '98, so I can't compare the two performance-wise. Best, 06:54, 3 May" +" I agree. - talk " +Hyperlinks removed. 1623 +Pygmy Guru I guess my point was, instead of just deleting the Pygmy Guru in such a lazy fashion, I would have expected you to at least try to better the article. Isn't that the purpose of Wikipedia? To expand, as a community, each article to provide information for the masses? It is not your job to police Wikipedia. You technically have no job here. But if you want to better the readers' experience, maybe better the article so that it follows the website's guidelines? I don't know. I never really thought laziness was an admirable trait of a moderator. Please reconsider. - Your absolute biggest fan. +Not true? So you are saying when the New York Times says the facts are in dispute that isn't good enough for you? How can I have an honest debate if you aren't willing to engage but instead hide behind the edit war claim? 129.59.79.123 +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cheetos, you will be blocked from editing. 83 +Excuse me, whoever the Fuck you are SPUI says on his talk page that he likes vandalism, and doesn't want it reverted. The modification that I made was to text originally left by a vandal. Please do your homework before censoring others!!!! +" SUPREME_LEADER != SUPREME_LEADER_OF_IRAN needs fix Supreme Leader is NOT Supreme Leader of Iran needs to be fixed throughout, or quantify ""Supreme Leader of Iran"" (reference) is ""a supreme leader""." +oh why dear johnny boy Oi, cock face johnCD my pages that have now been deleted, thanks (sarcasm) but my pages weren't finished i was in rush and planned to edit them later contact me. also keep looking over your shoulder for sisher and his army of trojin horses. remember that name CD sishers coming for you +I think he has credible claims to importance; but I agree that the sources are borderline leaning towards lacking for supporting notability, so can clearly see the logic of a merge proposal. - Barek +Is anyone from Morphett Vale here? Hey, just wondering, is there anyone who lives in Morphett Vale on the site? +I believe it because of that I live in central-Europe. +WP:FILMS Newsletter The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. +" Unfortunately, 'superpowers' means more than one thing. -T-C " +Dresden Dolls and Amanda Palmer Should his article feature something about his performences with The Dresden Dolls and Amanda Palmer? +", which explains the ""hangon"" confusion" +Survey Hi Brooke! I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate! It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate! Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google! Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! +"It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from . Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (T | C | @) " +" Just so you all know... I contacted Stephanie Adams at the phone number on her WHOIS for her website. I did not mention Wikipedia at all. I entertained her at being interested in getting a tarot card reading. As she drank a drink on the phone, had her TV volume up very loud, was talking to ""homeboys"" in the background she told me all sorts of prices. Just as plain as day it clicked. Stephanie Adams is a 2 bit whore that WAS in PlayBoy, is NOT now in PlayBoy, is now a NOTHING and is trying very HARD to become a something by creating small websites all over the internet that make her LOOK like something. IE: The so called Public Release about her that was done suppossedley by a person named Saphica (Who is in fact 100% verified Stephanie Adams) After I told her I was not interested in any of her services she was very upset and hung up on me. I have watched this entry on to Wiki now for almost 3 months. I did my fact checking, which NO ONE here has done. Her books ARE NOT IN PRINT. They are DOWNLOADABLE ONLY. She made them with Cafe Press Instant Publicshing. ANYONE here could write a ""book"" The books of hers at Amazon.com, try to order one, it takes you to her homepage. Amazon cannot sell the book because it DOESN'T EXIST. Do some fact checking. The user Goddessy has about 15 sock puppets on here, anyone with half a brain can see it. User Goddesssy IS IN FACT Stephanie Adams. And for all you admins that think making changes to her entry and kissing her butt will make a difference, she's doing this ALL OVER THE NET. LOL Search geocities once, she's made about 100 so called proffessionaly designed websites for sale. Get a grip guys, dont loose focus, CHECK DETAILS. Dont just be led on by a (ewww) pretty face..." +, according to your definition? Why not include the Scientologists and Odinists while we're at it +Recent edits why were the quotes from the associated press article and the picture removed, this was not discussed and was a major change and there wasnt much of an edit summary if one at all. +oh get a life who took that link out!!!!!!!!!! +Thanks, a great improvement. +Also, it'd be great if you could reply to this on my talk page. +The disruption caused by such a move would not be justified based uniquely on arguments of convenience - anyone arriving at the China article is immediately faced with a link to the PRC in bold. +WHY?! Why do I have AIDS!! +- and also admit being dick that time +Congradualtions, Feldspar. I guess this means people will start keeping tabs on you. heh. +SLIMVIRGIN IS A FATWHORE She hordes diamonds while Palestinian children starve to death +God fuck you too, pimple ass. My additions are better, you guys are just to stupid to realize it. +As I have said before, it's not the motives, it's the results of them motives. I can read, and I'm smart enough to see Smear campaign when its in front of me. Now I would suggest, you make sure the James Philip (a retired Republican office holder) don't be come a dump site of lies, fanciful speculations, guilt by association/Ad hominem attacks, Red herring fishing trips, and all purpose character assassination and ends up reading like huge democratic attack piece. see WP:ATP Also, I consider your refactoring and reformatting my words on my talk page to be rude and abusive and you should stop it. I have seen the warnings and acknowledged them, now I will remove them. +I'm wording that wrong. In general, I don't think an OVA needs to be separate from the main series, unless it is very different. I don't know much about Nuku Nuku, so if the OVA is significantly different from the series, then I can see keeping it separate, though hopefully that means someone will be expanding Dash into a full article? +The Table of Sacrifices is an artifact summoned by the Three Sacks in order to raise the Yamiking (and likewise, Hydrate) to the surface. Typically, a being from the Reverse Maruhage can only individually teleport back and forth between dimensions (we see when Crimson, LOVE and the Sacks return to the Dark World, they use a teleporter that allows them to raise and fall between the surface). My assumption is that an object such as the Yamiking needs a lot of energy to rise up to the main world compared to the limited amount of energy that individuals can use. Thus, the Table of Sacrifices is needed to gather energy from twelve individuals (in the form of a clock) to power the Yamiking. After the Sacks summon the clock, Crimson and LOVE throw over defeated opponents (already known to be really strong since they made it to the final stage of the playoff) into each number, with the assumption that their great energy will siphon from the clock to the Yamiking. - +" These pages contain material which is ha ha only serious. Very ha ha, but also very serious, so pay attention after you're done with the giggles! Adminitis is a state of mind in which some Wikipedians find themselves at times. Though generally confined to administrators, the condition has been observed in some non-administrators. Although the exact causes are unknown, there is thought to be some correlation towards extensive and prolonged anti-vandalism activity. Symptoms Strongly believes that all users are equal but admins are more equal than others Assumes bad faith frequently TLAitis (see WP:WOTTA) Stops editing articles, but continuously pontificates about ""writing the encyclopedia"" Impatience Exhibits immediatism Hangs out in project namespace Has no time for featured articles Frequently refreshes pages to catch the latest change that (of course) needs to be reverted Believes that he or she is always right (sorry, EVula...) Believes anyone who uses the word 'vote' for 'express a view in a straw poll' should be banned for life Originally hailed as the nicest person on the wiki, now reviled as the most hated troll Prevents pages from being edited in encyclopedic fashion for policy reasons Seems to enjoy biting new users General BOFHness Strict adherence to ""Wikipedia policy"" while not using common sense or conversely, Strict adherence to ignore all rules, as a strict rule... while not using common sense Self-denial. ""This page cannot possibly apply to me"" Humor breakdown. ""This page is not funny"" Sudden spike in use of specific admin tools, or use of admin tools in areas where he hadn't been using them before Requires less and less evidence to be convinced of sock puppetry until confidently asserting that all new users are the same person Spends hours writing sarcastic pages about admin behavior Believes he is the only real claimant to the ""Defender of the Wiki"" barnstar Exhibits signs of MPOV Thinks people are attacking them when they're only trying to be nice Has a habit of removing criticism while pretending it's a personal attack Indulges in biting delicious newcomers Diagnosis It is a near universal truth that sufferers from this illness will reject any diagnosis of the condition by an outside party. With that in mind, it's important for those who have received this diagnosis to conduct a self-test. If more than three of the following apply to you, you may be suffering from this illness: You frequently feel that pages are broken and must be deleted (protection is for wusses!). ""Everyone is a vandal or a troll, and must be blocked"" is a recurrent thought. ""Blocking people is a punishment! (not a tool to get people to cool down and edit the wiki)"" is a mantra, not anti-wiki. If you nominate this page for MfD even though it's only 2 minutes since the last revision, you may possibly be suffering from adminitis. Corollary: If you speedy, you are certainly suffering from adminitis. If you accuse the creators of this article of making a WP:POINT, especially if you forget that making a point does not imply disruption (you need to disrupt to make a point, not make a point to disrupt! -P), you are probably infected. And if you buy the above line of thought, you are definitely infected. Pathophysiology The infectious nature of this illness is unknown at this time. More study needs to be conducted in order to identify transmission mechanisms. No effective containment mechanisms have been identified. So far anti-vandal bots have proved immune to this condition, although as yet there is no convincing explanation concerning this anomaly. Observational studies have noted that sufferers will seek the counsel of their Wikipedia friends, but end up infecting them in the process. Other studies have noted the evolution of a Wikipedia editor as potentially having a causal role in this illness. Treatment Treatment varies from case to case. As of 2006, no c +Show you're an all powerful wikipedia admin and contact my provider (telenet) and ban me. This is what you was your threat, wasn't it? Well, I call your bluff. Do it. +Assessments I wondered if you'd consider joining the Assessments department back at WP Latin, as a member. This basically means you and any other member of the Department are more dedicated to assessing them. I ask because I notice you have been doing a lot of assessing recently! . +" I just wonder how can say one day ""I can postively attest that Waya sahoni and Jeff Merkey are not the same person. I am acquainted with both and know that they are two totally different individuals"" and the next ""I have never personally met Jeff Merkey nor Waya sahoni face to face. "". If he lost his account simply because he lied, too bad for him. However, I'm still convinced that the two sentences were not written by the same person. " +REDIRECT Talk:Animal conspiracy theories involving Israel +The Suite Life Of Zack & Cody The Movie There Is Going To Be [[A Disney Channel Original Movie called The Suite Life Of Zack & Cody in 2008 Summer followed by That's So Raven The Movie.I Work At The Disney Company So I Know This.So Somebody please write it down. +" SNowspinners true colours SnowspinnerTABSo, Irate just hit upon a fascinating new aspect of personal attack paroles brought up by the new blocking behavior. Denelson83_IPATABAnd that would be...? SnowspinnerTABIn that he's managed to make a personal attack... while blocked for personal attacks. PhroziacTABdayum! Denelson83_IPATABOf course SnowspinnerTABNow what does one do? SnowspinnerTAB(I picked ""Reblock for a week and tell him I'll protect his page if he keeps it up."") MattCryptoTABSnoswpinner protect the page SnowspinnerTAB(Prediction: He will personally attack me in response. I'm sure snowsoiner considers any defence against himself to be an attack. Some more SnowspinnerTABOh. Hi Irate. Didn't see you in there. =-=TABMode #wikipedia +o Snowspinner by ChanServ =-=TABMode #wikipedia +b *!*Irate@217.44.39.* by Snowspinner =-=TABYOU (Irate) have been booted from #wikipedia by Snowspinner (Snowspinner) " +hey, nerd. I don't want to have to create another username! You're one of them aren't you? Irregardless, it's pretty easy to tell that you'e been bullied your whole life and are now lashing out at the world with your abuse of internet mod privileges. Hope you're proud of yourself. Are you honestly too thick to see that a Christian cunt coming at me for breaking blasphemy laws is obscene? Honestly, you must be one of them, judging by your behaviour = IQ = Christian. +" You shoot your entire imbecilic argument in the head with the silly claim about ""10 cars go past per day, tops"". I've driven the Stuart Highway several times and never passed less than 10 cars per hour, in quiet times. Thats less than freeways overseas but still a lot more traffic than ""10 cars per day"". " +So enterprising of you Pm_shef. I wonder where you get this drive to fight your father's fights. +" declares WikiWar on you! Spread this war by adding to other's talk pages with terms for an unconditional surrender." +"""List of United States cities by area"" says Sitka, Alaska, has 4,812 square miles, of which 2,874 are land; Juneau, Alaska, has 3,255 square miles, of which 2,717 are land; Anchorage, Alaska, has 1,961 square miles, of which 1,697 are land; and Jacksonville, Florida, has 874 square miles, of which 758 are land. ""List of cities by surface area"" matches that, except that it mentions ""Juneau City and Borough"". The pages about those four individual cities today have figures that match, too. Yet, when I posted in this section several days ago, the article on Jacksonville said 1,962.4 square miles. Jacksonville's own government website says it has 841 square miles, not 874 or 758. I'm not sure whether some people or governments are rightly or wrongly putting all of a county's land into the city's listed area. I can say that, in the case of Jacksonville, although the governments of the (a) City of Jacksonville and (b) Duval County are unified, there is (or ought to be) separate reckoning of the city's and county's area, because Duval County also contains three other cities (Jacksonville Beach, Atlantic Beach, and Neptune Beach), which are not part of the City of Jacksonville (they have their own, separate police departments, for example—even though the Jacksonville Public Library is county-wide). The government website of the City and Borough of Juneau says it has 2,593.6 square miles of land and 487.6 square miles of water, for a total of 3,081.2 square miles. Neither the total nor the land area there matches what Wikipedia gives. At the government website of the City and Borough of Sitka, I haven't found the area. Same for the government website of Anchorage. But it does link to anchorage.net, which says the city has 1,955 square miles—which, like the government figures for Jacksonville and Juneau, doesn't match Wikipedia's figure. " +NP, boo-boo's happen. Done my own fair share of boners over the decades. Indeed, if a Nobel Prize were awarded for boners, I'd have a few. Your edit was irrelevant, due to your content here. I do enjoy a relatively good reputation, something I've well enjoyed for decades. Hence, I protect my reputation, but give option for a boo-boo to be recognized. I'm far from perfect (save as a disaster), I expect perfection from nobody. ) +" I'm only answering this because I'm really bored, excruciatingly so, and I also find it kind of amusing. People writing and, or, approving of psychologically harmful disinformation, that starving girls read, including the expressed desire to include a potentially triggering image of such a starving girl, illicits no response whatsoever. A collapsible box however, seems to be somehow construed as a threat to civilization. One inane comment after another becomes somewhat irritating. Despite only having a ninth grade education, I actually did learn how to read. I also learned the proper use of Latin phrases, e.g.; id est (i.e) and exempli gratia (e.g.). For example, or to use an abbreviation of a Latin phrase, e.g.; ...in article text, i.e., how they were recently used here. Should have been e.g., not, i.e.. That being said, I read this: MOS:COLLAPSE:Scrolling lists and boxes that toggle text display between hide and show are acceptable for use, but should not be used in article prose. This includes reference lists, image galleries, and image captions; Collapsible sections are useful in ,infoboxes, or to consolidate information already covered in prose. This is not prose: Candidate genes include dopamine transporter, dopamine receptors D2/D3,[46] dopamine beta-hydroxylase monoamine oxidase A, catecholamine-methyl transferase, serotonin transporter promoter (SLC6A4), 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor (5-HT2A), 5-hydroxytryptamine 1B receptor (5-HT1B),[47] the 10-repeat allele of the DAT1 gene,[48] the 7-repeat allele of the DRD4 gene,[48] and the dopamine beta hydroxylase gene (DBH TaqI).[49] Your alleged concern over compliance with WP:ACCESS is unwarranted and seems to be self serving. It says nothing about ""Collapsible boxes"". As I stated in an aforementioned paragraph, anorectic kids reading about death, mortality and suicide after enjoying a triggering look at an inappropriate image should be a cause for concern not ""Collapsible boxes"". You're a college graduate with according to you ""This user's Intelligence Quotient is annoyingly high, please conduct yourself accordingly, chose your arguments wisely, and learn the difference between e.g. and i.e., also thank you for giving me something to do by writing a response, I was sooooo bored. Cura, ut valeas " +Respectful Request about Union of the Crowns I understand that you wish to voice your own say in all articles of Scottish relation, but please discuss your disagreements before plunging into edit wars. Point out your disagreement first and then we can work out the kinks and idiosyncrasies, or other unbecoming attributes. I'm willing to hear you out, but only through the talk page discussion. +Ritchie Blackmore used the under over technique while playing Smoke on the Water in the 70s, so it shouldn't be listed as an invention of Batio. +Please unblock me! I need to make my own account! +" The ""bloodless"" battle between Ohio and Michigan wasn't truly bloodless: a teenager stabbed a deputy in the leg with a penknife and ran away. (unregistered) " +WHY THE FUCK DO U EDIT MY CONTRIB. TO WIKI ABOUT THE IRANIAN ARMY? THEY MUST DIE U KNOW!! STUPID TERRORISTS...THEY'RE LIVING ON ISRAELI SOIL CALLED ASIA-AFRICA WHICH SHOULD BE FOR ISRAELIS ONLY AND MUSLIM FREE +"OPPOSED Rod, pole, and perch are used interchangeably (though in practice rod is most often used) in measuring the 16-1/2-foot *length*, but for area the use of ""perch"" is almost exclusive, probably stemming from the perch also historically representing units, if I recall correctly that defined both Scots and Irish miles and acres, whereas this didn't apply necessarily to pole, and rod, pretty certain the pole never referred to Irish and Scots units. " +Response Well, thanks for giving me a final warning. As usual, I get no appreciation for expanding articles on this site, no words of encouragement for the hours that I spend fighting vandalism; just crap. Crap for the 0.1% of my edits that could be described as nonconstructive. Way to go, moron. Keep up the good work. - +Cool. I'll check out Kay, and take it from there. All the best. +" Photo ID :File:Cucurbita_2011_G1.jpg, in that photo there is definitely C. pepo. I'm think the one at the back is C. moschata. Maybe some are C. maxima. What do you think? Some of these are very hard to distinguish from just a photo. I think we can post at FAC within a day or two. talk " +I'd like to try to help. Could you explain your perspective on why you were blocked, and can you think of anything you could do to remedy the concerns that led to the block? +Oh i see how it is yall jelous cause yall a bunch of yankees and im not im gonna sue yall +" Please fix this line on ron Paul ""Paul's libertarianism is not absolute: He voted to prohibit adoptions by same sex couples in the District of Columbia."" it is in violation of serveral wikipedia policies including Wikipedia:No_original_research and Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Cite_sources. 1. it assumes that ron paul voting against these adoptions is un-libertarian Under Wikipedia guidelines ""In summary, if the facts, opinions, or arguments you want to include in an article have not been published by a credible or reputable publication, you're engaged in original research"" goes along with 4, as no source has been citied 2. It is written from an uneutral point of view, it assumes that voting to prohibit adoptions by same sex couples in the district of Columbia is unlibertarian and states this as a fact. without even delving into any Paul's reason. 3. Information is unverifiable Thank you" +" What's wrong with the Punjabis? Creating division among Pakistanis and then pretending to be ""musleheen"" (peace makers)? Al-Quran 2:11 When it is said to them: ""Make not mischief on the earth,"" they say: ""Why, we only Want to make peace!""" +map source Hi there, where did you get this map http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kosovo_map-en1.svg do you have the rights to it? can we use it in open streetmap? thanks, mike +" Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) " +Question Hey Tombseye, just wondering if you could add your email address to your account. You can do that by going to Special:Preferences. I need to send you something. +, 17 January 2015 (UTC)|decline=The IP address you're using has been blocked, because it acts like a proxy server or cloud computer provider. While we could grant you IP Block Exemption, this would only be done if there was an actual need for you to edit from this IP address. 21:00 +Just like how Australia is now mainly Caucausian... or Singapore is predominantly ethnically Chinese.. just that the UAE won't hand out citizenship that generously... +We're making progress, but I'm still not sure that even the footnote should even be there. It's from a message board, and I don't think that fits WP:RS. +20 retards u fuckin paki fuckersItalic textfukin taliban == fuck u == fuck u again fuck u even more == == +" Fair use rationale for Image:SyphonFilter2Box.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SyphonFilter2Box.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +1964: Space Edition on 06/04/2014 I love making this series, but I didn't get any barnstars because I didn't make it up the rank unless I get my Content Review Medal and my Gold WikiAward. +SmithStreet article Hi, changes have since been made to the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SmithStreetSolutions to amend its 'orphaned' status. Also, reference links have been added to ascertain notability. Would it be possible to have these tags removed? Please let me know any other ways we can improve the article. Thanks 116.228.36.134 +" Dear Michael, thanks for your comment. I made the comment about the old version of the article almost exactly 3 years ago, see the version at that time: . It said ""Einstein–Cartan theory in theoretical physics extends general relativity, to handle spin angular momentum correctly."" at the very beginning and the whole article was written in the spirit of the claim that general relativity (without extensions) describes the spin incorrectly. As far as I can read, this is no longer claimed by the article. Einstein-Cartan theory is a historically important extension of general relativity, with some extra fields (torsion), but all the modern evidence indicates that such extra fields don't exist - and they're not needed. If you care about sociology, no research of cosmology or calculations of NASA's experiments or anything of the sort takes the ""torsion field"" into account because the latter doesn't exist, as far as the existing evidence - theoretical or experimental - can say. Today, it's not an important proposal to extend GR. The new article doesn't make these points too clear but at least it also no longer makes crazy claims throughout the text that general relativity (without torsion) is inconsistent with the spin, or something like that, so I wouldn't protest against the new version. Visually, it surely looks like a well-written article. However, I see some confusion in your comment that does show that the articles doesn't explain the basic points too clearly. Einstein-Cartan theory is not ""just"" about the tetrads. Tetrads are indeed useful - and in some formal sense necessary - to describe spin in General Relativity. However, using the tetrads formalism is not yet Einstein-Cartan theory. Einstein-Cartan theory assumes that ""torsion"" may be nonzero - even though it is identically zero in general relativity (which normally uses the metric). One can write GR in terms of tetrads as well - and the torsion is still zero. If that's so, one isn't doing Einstein-Cartan theory. " +In 1988 a Wide Use Campaign was introduced by republican senator, Mark Hatfield. The Wide Use Campaign supported unrestricted access to timber and other resources. Wise Use activists exploited the population’s fear of job and property security loss. The Campaign placed a barrier between workers and environmentalists. The Wide Use Campaign used bumper stickers, phone-ins and faxes to promote their views. Wise Use and Republicans kicked off anti-environmentalism. The recession that began in 1990 enhanced anti-green and pro-industry views. A group called Alliance for America was created with 125 anti-environment and pro-industry groups. In 1994, the US did not pass a Biodiversity Treaty. Another group that was created in the 90’s was called Earth Day Alternatives. They were also counter-environmentalists. This group labelled environmentalists as “anti-human” and extremists. The Earth Day Alternative group promoted three things. They aimed to privatise resources for exploitation, advocate pollution to be permitted as trade between companies, to discredit environmental science. Heritage was a group that was also created with a laissez-faire approach toward the environment. Anti-environmentalists were motivated by the fact that the ICI created deceptive green advertising. +Hey, dumbfuck, quit fucking around with Wikipedia, bitch. +" Islamic terrorism Hi again Sir Nicho. I thought most of the views at the Afd were for naming it Islamist terrorism instead of Islamic terrorism. Cheers '''' - Wiki me up ® by all means. Godspeed! — Nearly Headless Nick {C} {L} " +I agree, Fuller is a useless stupid fuck +The United Kingdom is a unitary state governed under a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary system, with its seat of government in the capital city of London. There are three devolved national administrations, each with varying powers, situated in Belfast, Cardiff and Edinburgh; the capitals of Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland respectively...... +" Incorrect speedy deletion You were incorrect to speedy delete Category:Science and technology in Myanmar. Firstly, this is a first level national subcategory that it standard issue for every country in the world above the level of a microstate, and such categories should NEVER be deleted. It should have been fixed instead. Secondly, it is was empty, I suspect you have played into the hands of someone who takes a non-neutral stance on the Burma/Myanmar naming issue, and has abused process by emptying the category without following due process on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. I will be correcting your error later today when I have time. Actually, the discussion at the CFD you mentioned does seem to have clear concensus (no opposes, in fact), and this was just one of SEVERAL myanmar->burma categories that I deleted. Another user has removed all the articles from these categories and (I suppose) placed them into new categories as described in the CFD. Your message does not have the tone of a good faith communication which attempts to work together to improve this encyclopedia, but rather a chastisement after your mind is made up on the issue. Please be more mindful of your tone in messages to other users. As for ""I'm gonna fix... please ensure that your actions are per concensus, and not just how you WANT it. talk contribs " +" Ultimatum - noun, a final demand or statement of terms, the rejection of which will result in retaliation or a breakdown in relations. So you want some specific person to put their foot down, and demand something of you, otherwise they'll throw a hissy-fit? Weird. Who is this person you're referring to? By the way, if you read the previous sections instead of just starting new ones every few hours you'll see that this question has come up before several times... just to be ignored by you. Propose this section be removed per wp:TALK (""Deleting material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages)"" is permitted). Stop creating new discussion sections with new topics as soon as someone replies to you. " +I think this article is a little biased.... I don't particularly recall the old format being hugely popular. I do know that I love 88.3's current format. I can almost always turn it on and find a song I know. +THE PERSON WHOSE EDITS YOU REVERTED HY. I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU THAT YOU CAN'T BAN ME. PROXIES ARE VERY NICE. AREN'T THEY? NOW FUCK YOU. +" DYK for 2000 Sugar Bowl On 4 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article 2000 Sugar Bowl, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, " +" A case of undue weight at the VERY LEAST. This article is not titled ""Denial of genocides in history"". " +" ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED? TAB Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Solaris (2002 film). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Ali TAB TAB What the fuck is your problem. Did you even read what I deleted? TAB TAB DO you know what the word PLOT means? TAB TAB Plot does NOT mean talking about the movie's trailer or what genre the movie it is. A plot is a SUMMARY of the movie. TAB TAB Read what's in the Plot section of ""solaris"" right now you fucking retard and tell me if it really belongs under the section plot... or any other section. It looks more like trivial facts which are unsupported and should be DELETED as per wiki regulations. TAB TAB Here's an example, dumb fuck, from the solaris wiki page: TAB TAB ""The film essentially ignores the planet which only serves as an anonymous backdrop, in contrast to Lem's novel which discusses at length the mysterious phenomena on its surface and the futile human attempts to understand them."" TAB TAB That is NOT neutrality and has NOTHING to do with the plot. TAB TAB Jesus FUCKInG CHRIST. Wiki is full of fucking morons. TAB TAB Delete that shit. TAB " +SIPRI reference at here. You seem to be having trouble using it. To obtain the required data, find Sweden from the first list, then click on Add. Find India in the second list, then click on the 2nd Add button next to it on the right. The select the range, say from 1960 to 2011 from the drop-down menu. Then select the weapon type - in the case of Bofors, select Artillery. The chose either of the 2 options Suppliers or recipients, and click on Download. An MS Excel file with the desired info would be downloaded. Please remember that SIPRI is the most reliable reference in case of military arms/trade related information. Thanks! | talk | contrib +Articles are not meant to be trolled, I don't care you're admin, I've been on Wikipedia for years. +" Image copyright Hi Matthew,since I've now twice ( ) used your user page as an example, I just wanted to let you know that a number of images you have on your user page probably claim an incorrect copyright status (along with thousands of others). No need to do anything at this point, I'm not yet sure what we're going to need to do about that (if anything), just letting you know. Actually, I'd prefer if you kept them all up so that I could continue to use them as an example. ) Initial discussion is at User talk:Moonriddengirl#Commissioned work, if you're interested, but will probably move to WP:MCQ sooner or later.Cheers, Amalthea " +" Plain mistake: ""The amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances."" Naturally this is wrong. The amendment prohibits **Congress** from making any such law, it does not prohibit the making of such a law altogether.129.133.127.244 " +Charles Matthews NPOV objection makes no sense to me. Tự Đức was emperor of Vietnam for less than four decades and this article covers many centuries. If the article covered the sequence of events for all 117 martyrs over four centuries, it would be disproportionately long. I recommend removing the NPOV tag. +You are still not demonstrating a basic understanding of how to use Wikipedia(including properly formatting your posts and signing them) or answering the questions that have been asked of you. I would suggest you take the advice of Squinge above- preferably voluntarily. +" Question Are you this arrogant in real life or are you just loike this online where you can be ""safe""?" +Found a page in regards to the history on the schools official website: http://www.geelonghigh.vic.edu.au/About/history.html I'll get around to adding some stuff later or someone else can do it. I don't mind. +___ Vampirate: From what I understand bats are not more likely to transmit rabies than any other mammal, and in fact few cases are acturally caused by bat bites. +I don't understand. I was only adding stuff about Jason. Why are you mean to me now ( == === +, 11 October 2009 (UTC) If I made some error, then why can't someone explain it to me on the Talk page? I am not pushing a POV. I edited an inflammatory sentence about a Jewish issue in the Schlafly biography page. I think that the sentence is anti-Jewish, but you may have your own opinion. Maybe you think the sentence is pro-Jewish. Either way, the sentence is contrary to WP BLP policy and must be removed immediately, unless it is reliably sourced. The source is a paragraph in a NY Times book review by a Jewish columnist. Schlafly did not write the book in question, and Schlafly is not Jewish. The book is not about Jews. The paragraph is not backed up by anything. The paragraph is partially explained by the fact that columnist is Jewish and likes to write about Jewish issues. The paragraph is a criticism of the book, and not a criticism of Schlafly. I think that the sentence is too unsupported and too far removed and too strange to even be included in an article about Schlafly. But if it is going to be there, then it should stick to what the NY Times columnist said. I believe that the sentence in dispute implies something about Schlafly that is not stated in the NY Times book review. That is what I argued on the Talk page, and no one rebutted that argument. Blocking me is just a way to put a false and defamatory allegation about a living person in a WP article. It is wrong, and those who put this Jew-related allegation in should be blocked, not me. 16:19 +North Union Railway What is the problem with the 3 references I added to North Union Railway? They look OK to me. +It's predominately an aerospace/vehicle engineering term. The nearest concept to it in formal science is proper acceleration which is measured in m/s^2 rather than g's, but is otherwise the same thing. It's not simply coordinate acceleration; it's the type of acceleration measured by accelerometers. The fact that you seem so adamant that it doesn't exist if anything shows that this article is needed.- () Wolfkeeper (Talk) +" Your edit to Digimon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Talk " +Syndication/Programming Blocks or Network Programming? +2010 Formula One season +Don't call me a knob, you wanker. +I certainly understand your point, and agree that technical terms must be defined. I am not convinced putting a glossary in the beginning of the article is the best option, but can't think of a better alternative. +" April 2008 Howdy. I'd encourage you to review Wikipedia:Notability before contributing names of people for ""Notable Alumni"" lists. For example, your recent edit to Bentley College inserted someone who does not appear to meet the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability and has been removed. Don't be discouraged; you're more than welcome to contribute, and seem to have plenty of good contributions. But if you're going to insert people, especially those without Wikipedia pages, it's useful to try to find a reliable source indicating their notability. (Further, ""Social worker superstar"" wouldn't fly anyway, due to Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View.) " +Merge There is no good reason for a short orphan article on Fullerenes in popular culture to exist. It would hardly overwhelm this page to add it. +This IP address is used by ConVal High School +Jeez. Twunchy is really obsessed. I've re-edited the intro so that it incorporates about 80% of his words, but he still insists on reverting and refusing to discuss things on the Talk page. I know you hate these things, but can you post something there just so it doesn't look like Taivo versus Twunchy. I don't really even care if I'm right or wrong, but he's got his panties in a wad that his words aren't considered sacred. ( ) +Hi again! I have added my image with appropriate copyright tags into wikimedia commons. How do I pull the image from there to his wikipedia page? I can only find info about downloading a new image directly to wikipedia. +" I looked up the definition of Acting in the legal tense and put in simple terms, if you perform the powers and duties of an office, you are acting in the capacity stated. If Senator Bruno is performing the powers and duties of Lieutenant Governor without holding the actual office of Lieutenant Governor makes him even without the formal reference the de facto Acting Lieutenant Governor. It'd make sense that an Acting Lieutenant Governor would only become Acting Governor if need be. For your reference here is the Wikipedia article on the legal use of the term ""Acting"". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acting_(law)" +Wikipedia:Verifiability We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Mario Kart, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! +[Rilla] meaning Religious Inlightment language looping Audio. Definition: Urban people decodeing goverment propaganda Messages through Hiphop and Drum&bass; and other forms of music in moder day babylon rangeing from 1968 till the end of time.To spread truth through music the true voices of minority/indigenous people Its the age of keeping it Rilla External links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drum_n_bass http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiphop http://www.isound.com/djrilla/ +I hope so too. Nice to see that a CR and a Wiccan can work together {grin} +Liam is a painstaking writer who is a reliable, honest, energetic, and above all, selfless champion of the underdog. he has laboured to bring the torture carried out at ICC to light. In view of the thanklessness of this task, and of your carping sarcasm.. I think he deserves credit as a first class journalist. you, on the other hand, write for a self-applauding group. You have little, or no, experience of the wider world. Safe in your little tower, you spit on those who actually risk something for their writing. People like you are the reason torture centres like ICC can operate. Well done! Well done! I hope the ghosts of the little children who died at the hands of the ICC will stay with you... +07, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 17: +Werehyena Hi, back in December you added {{synthesis}} to Werehyena. I'm curious what your specific concerns were (there isn't anything on the talk page and you didn't mention anything in the edit summary). I had added some of the content myself (overlapping with bouda (folkore)) and if there were problems with it I'd like to clear them up. Thanks, (talk) +" Thanks a lot, really. Unfortunately, so far this discussion is productive only with you, independently from the fact whether you agree or not with me - at least there is an exchange of explanations between two human beings, which is generally called communication. It's amazing to have so many other users privileged with rights of administrators who still do not have anything to say, nor to explain.talk " +" Hello I thought WP:Sock, would be of interest to you. Whenever, you create new account, acknowledge this on your main page. No-Blast " +" Blocking and sockpuppets Okay, yes I DID vandalize the RD Reynolds article. Twice. But I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. I could understand blocking because of vandalism sure, but because of sockpuppetry? Who is this peripirus or whoever person who did this? Surely that is abuse of blocking power? Also this ""DX97"" is quite clearly a vandal him/her self. Again, if I have been blocked because and only because I vandalized an article, I can accept that. But this ""sockpuppet"" stuff is unfounded. Could these two people (the blocker, and the one who tagged me) actually state their case without just being smug and rash? " +No complaints on my end; I've not had any edit conflicts, so I'd just somewhat been assuming that you would have, simply for the reason of probability: I assumed that because we've been working on the same list at the same time, we would have been conficting some way or another. I'm happy to keep doing what we've been doing, sort of a division of effort as you mention. +" I'm glad that's cleared up. However, I'm wondering why your next edit (where I reverted a significant content change that you had indicated only as a minor typo correction in your edit summary) was marked as ""revert vindictive nitpicking""? " +hey idiot you were the one that was repeatedly undoing MY edits. Go away, AND STOP VANDALISING! +" Moldopodo, stop accusing me of ""never trying to reach consensus or to prove whatsoever"" and stop trolling. What you do is called trolling. " +U.S. GDP sees worst drop in five decades I think it would be good for Obama's article: U.S. GDP sees worst drop in five decades The source can't be better. +Where's your new one? +If you wish to quote higher figure, contact either Hindu or Times of India and ask them where they get their numbers from. Until then, do not make any major changes in Wikipedia without proper source. +DRM Posted the DRM news. I know it's tempting, but don't post negative reaction til articles criticizing the DRM are published (which shouldn't be too long). +I removed Co. Clare from the list of counties not named for a town - the town of Clare is now known as Clarecastle. I would suggest that Co. Kerry also should be removed from that list, in view of the name in Gaelic of Castleisland - Oileann Chiarrai. +2008 (UTC) These are all the comments I have time to offer at the moment - I'm terribly sorry. See new banner. ) | talk 20:41, 1 February +" And, sorry, but I am not going to go for a ""oh, I'm so very sorry, Mr. Admin sir, I'm not worthy but please unblock me"" boot licking performance. I have been as polite as can be expected under the circumstances (I have got progreesively less polite, but in the face of having my reasoning ignored). You've made a mistake here, so it is your responsibility to fix it, and WP is the biggest loser if you don't ... " +Dijxtra appears to be dead, just as you say...I don't see +" Right, I requested, and succeeded in getting, page protection for two weeks until we can fix this mess. (Talk) " +", 31 March 2011 (UTC) See you jackasses are soooo flippant when you speak of Biblical things. Yet you wonder why people like me get angry. You have just proved one thing, you don't care, wikipedia doesn't care and this liberal rag will do whatever it wants so screw us little pee-ons who aren't as high and mighty as you wiki-gods. You make me sick, you really make me sick - you are the perfect atheist liberal, so be proud. I knew even speaking to you would be a waste of time, that is why I nor any of the places I work will ever allow students to use Wikipedia. We give an instant ""F"" to anyone that puts it in their endnotes.69.14.96.9 02:43" +neutrality This article should make explicit that ghosts are supernatural and do not exist (it seems to entertain the opposite possibility). I know that this is obvious, but an encyclopedia article should suppose zero prior knowledge of the subject and therefore state the obvious. +FUCK YOU, GO SUCK SOME DOG COCK! YOU FUCKING DICK LICKERS! +PS I have retrieved an earlier version of my article through Google cache. I sent it to the Waukon Standard () with a fun explanation. I doubt this will reach the AP, but it is fun to catch and publicize Wikipedia abuse. Yes, I will be blocked by you for saying such things, but then, all wiki admins need getting blocked. +"Hello, {{safesubst:BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{safesubst:BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]]{{safesubst:#if:|, especially what you did for }}.I am , I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on {{safesubst:#if:|Earlymen|talk|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ''' message me! " +Let's move on. I think it's best to. +"After this case, the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) attempted a nationwide assessment of child grooming. The report found that police, social services and charities were failing to properly investigate this ""hidden issue"" and that a quarter of offenders reported for child grooming since 2008 were Asian, an apparently disproportionate figure, but Peter Davies, the head of Ceop, was quick to clarify that the findings did not provide a national picture because of incomplete data, and cautioned against extrapolating anything from the results. He added that ""looking at this issue through the lens of ethnicity does not do the victims any favours."" Again - I'm not sure that this section needs to exist. Also from the outset it is misleading. CEOP constantly monitor for and act upon child grooming - they didn't suddenly decide to start after this case. CEOP has existed since April 2006 and there has been a phased introduction of their work in conjuration with partners ever since - starting it's main recognised operations in 2009, by which time the police were acting. The wording implies that CEOP had not acted earlier to protect the victims - they could not act they did not exist! TTFN " +Further investigation showed that there was no violation there, rather the other sites copied Wikipedia content. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 18 for evidence. However, this should be merged with Halloweentown series. +Dbinder, you asked if someone could verify those possible future regional members... well, if someone really could they wouldn't be possible future members but future members.... anyway: as SAS ownes the majority stake in arBaltic and a 49% stake in Estonian Air with whome they have a close coopeartion, so it's very likely that these two airlines will go the way that Blue1 already went and join the alliance as Regional Members. Air One is very close with Lufthansa and fully integrated in Lufthansa's Miles&More; FFP. In fact they are the only fully integrated Airline that is not a Star Alliance member yet. But that seems to be a matter of time. At the very moment Austrian Airlines ownes a 49% Stake in Slovak Airlines. As the Slovak government is planning to sell off the remaining stake in that airline it is highly likely that Austrian will accquire these stakes. A Star Alliance membership is absolutely possible. Silk Air is a fully owned subsidiary of Singapore Airlines. I won't comment on that, as I have never heard of them being a candidate for Alliance membership, but doesn't seem unlikely. Aegean Airlines and Lufthansa started cooperation last year and according to some statements in the German press both airlines seem to be very interessted in Aegean joining the Alliance. Luxair has strong ties to Lufthansa and Austrian... might not be joining in the nearest future, but would definitely be welcome in the Alliance Since you removed Qatar Airways from the list of possible members... It's no secret that Star is really interessterd in Qatar Airways. On the other hand Qatar Airways strengthened their cooperation with Lufthansa, ANA and United last year... they are definitely leaning towards Star Alliance. They are at least as likely to join Star as TAM or SN Brussles etc. to join OneWorld / Malaysia Airlines to join Skyteam +Link== I edited this page and it said that one of the hyperlinks contained spam so I had to delete one of the links. +" Request Chimp, can you do me a favor, please? I saw that you produced someone's edit count during their RfA using Interiot's new tool. I can't seem to get this to work, but I'd really like to know what my latest count is. If it's not too much trouble, and if you have time, would you mind producing mine for me? (But if it's any trouble, please ignore this request.) Many thanks, (talk) " +MY GOD, LISTEN TO YOURSELF! +I've resolved most of these, but I need clarification as to what the problem is about the ship being less wet than her predecessors. Thanks for the thorough review. +" And here's an apology from me too, I'm sorry Wikipedia isn't as nice and friendly as it used to be. ""Notice something different? We've made a few improvements to Wikipedia."" not from what I've experienced in the last few hours. " +" where are my insults? heres an insult for you = you're a fucking blind dipshit. you need to stop being a sensitive cunt. hows that for an insult?  (Talk)  " +This discussion isn't going anywhere. I'm unprotecting the page. Just keep in mind that any violations of the Wikipedia:Three revert rule will be enforced from here on out. Also, Ted, in having useful discussions, please don't rely solely on the fact that your adversary is ANONYNMOUS to discredit them. Please stick to the facts. If you insist on removing the guardian link, at least give a reason why. (talk) 20:24, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC) +Unless someone objects, I'm going to start moving material in from there to here. I see this article is fairly uneven as well, so hopefully the two can combine to form something better. Of course, if the other title is better for some reason we can always move it. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jerky (food). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 1994 " +" You potentially shows ""mafioso"". However where this fan is club? Link? -) Asus Italy is a shame! I will keep on also writing him/it without his/her support! Bye" +especially since both names appear on Episode 4 it's not that blurry +" Rollback I've enabled rollback on your account. Please read Wikipedia:Rollback feature before use, if you haven't already done so. Good luck! —  (t/c) " +Pointy sticks to drive back the barbarian hoards! Yay! -) - +" Ha, ha. I wish it were that simple. The word mutilation has connotations of disfigurement and dysfunction as well. If your doctor removes a wart from your nose, are you ""disfigured""? Is all plastic surgery ""mutilation""? I clipped my fingernails this morning, ""removing a part of"" my hands call the mental hospital, Uncle Ed mutilated himself! " +And then there's Henry IV style - don't look now! There are a whole bunch of these bitty articles around; I've added the most respectable to See also here. It reminds me why I usually prefer topics of a managable size. But I don't do architecture if I can avoid it. - Wetman & Giano are very good, though I don't know they do much this early. +Indiavision rises from the dead yet again Similar versions of the article on Indiavision have been previously speedy (and other?) deleted, primarily as spam. See , , and . Also, the user, and one IP address, has been blocked by you. See . I documented this on the article's talk page and am merely passing this on to you as the blocking admin. No reply needed. - +Don't threaten me, I don't respond kindly to threats from overinflated doughboys. +i dont care anymore i am going to continue unless there is justice bye 86.151.123.189 +the cunt, ya fucking old woman. +Amendment of template Is there any reason the Obama template can't be amended with a controversies line, on which we would mention Wright, Ayres, and birthplace? +"::*Pot, meet kettle. speak! " +LOL i know it seems stupid, i'm just not normally so forward. I can ask him for what I want, but he's already been asked... ( why should I have to repeat myself? All I want is for him to come over, and I will personally show him all the things that I want to do to him. You can watch in extasy and then everyone is satisfied, no? why do you think he is hesitating? maybe he's just finally settled down to the regular family life? i don't know, you certainly know him better than me! +TUSC token 303d4a694243464a4eefc41bb9eb0d18 I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! +other stuff that shouldn't really be on my front page. Though I don't know why. Doesn't matter anyway Blah! http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1132/is_n10_v48/ai_19344901 +Dreadnought? Pardon the ignorance, but was this ship a Dreadnought? The article doesn't say, and the evidence is a little unclear... +What is it that you can do as well as others? 125.39.16.85 +Of course you do! PacificWarrior101 +Fuck you, Smith. Please have me notified when you die. I want to dance on your grave. +" Dear Sir, I do not know what ""moderators"" you are talking about, but I would likely be one of them, and the last time I heard, the administrative corps - and particularly myself - had an extremely low tolerance for nationalist revert-warriors. Maps are maps. The last time I heard, they are geographic tools, not political ones, and it makes zero sense for the article itself to state ""Armenia is part of Southeast Asia"", and then for the map to show it as part of Europe. If you actually come up with some reliable sources that place Armenia inside Europe, I will be thrilled. Until then, kindly stop revert-warring and trying to bully Dbachmann like you managed to bully others above; the alternative is to get page-banned under WP:ARBAA2. Thank you. " +I dont care about kurds actually (i am neutral to them) but i dont want Turkey depicted as some backward ass third world shitehole that your trying to make it look like. I will do anything to stop it. Delete my messages to your pathetic heart's delight, but you cant stop me emailing every single kurdish editor on this page about your sadass additions which not only bash turkey but also lay the blame on kurds +How civil is this - who the fuck do you think you are to but in on a conversation between old friends, you cunt. +Except that the InformationWeek link, which has moved backs, was the quoted source for these reports. It these are 'weasel words', then the entire broadsheet press in the UK are weasels. This is simply how you relay such third party reports without supporting them. +I shall apply the many thousands of hours I would have happily given to your project to something more intelligently set up, instead. +only one involved yet i'm the only one blocked. +Are you gay? Are you a nigger? Are you a gay nigger? Then the Gay Nigger Association of America is right for you! Give me yor moneyz! +2002 ruling There is a problem with including the later ruling: we are relying on our own interpretation of the ruling. Please find analysis in independent reliable sources before re-inserting that paragraph. Thanks, Guy () +" Garrett You don't have to have the title of ""offensive coordinator"" to call plays. Happens on the time.►''''''Holla! " +How can I blocked for 2 weeks? +Me too, if I may put my curiousity out there. +An example: The 18th Dynasty ended when its last three kings—Tutankhamun, Aye, and Horemheb—each died without an heir. Think about this sentence. First the rest of the article does not give dynasty by dynasty chronology. Second, we are not told about the start of the 18th Dynasty or of it being anything special. Third, how does a dynasty end when three subsequen rulers die withouth heirs? I mean they ruled AFTER each other. Also, why is this such a big deal, when Egypt survived it the first 2 times? +You ask me not to post on your page and the you go and post on mine. Keep your pedofile self, off of my page. Go back to your child-love talking points, and kiddie porn. +" You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. ♫ " +BLP policy requires that statements regarding ethnicity be sourced. How difficult is that to understand? If you disagree with policy, propose that it be changed - or find the sources yourself. +GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Alapainui/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) +sorry to hear that. wish you a fast recovery. +The map can easily be shown this way with the Golan sqarely in Israel. That's my POV but I recognize that I have to deal with the community so In the interest and spirit of compromise, I would accept this version +2008 (UTC) Nevermind, brain fart. (talk | contribs) 13:40, 30 July +Looks like an outbreak of sanity: waste-of-time copyright zealots 0, wikipedia 2: , . Thanks to NW for looking +as described. These are normal contrails but there were cold war tests of this nature and according to records, they ended and were declassified as this just as this theory began +" AfD nomination of Subversion (computer game) Subversion (computer game), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Subversion (computer game) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subversion (computer game) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Subversion (computer game) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. " +Sorry, weren't you supposed to be in England this week? You must have been up all night. Tell me Bob, where are you precisely, what's your location and how can you be found? 94.196.243.207 +hahahah your an idiot why dont you LEAVE the talk HERE so everyone can SEE it....and decide for themselves.......grin if your an idiot or NOT. Raven . +Thanks! Hopefully when his block expires JTMcDonald will respond to the requests to discuss the issue, but if not I'll let someone else deal with it. ) +Stuff like that is often a remnant of ye olden days of Wikipedia, when there was far fewer rules and far, far fewer people roaming about looking for opportunities to enforce them. +If you believe the organization ACTDEC is notable, you can create a new article about it. The previous article contained no information at all, and was apparently created as an attack page. On the other hand, if you are affiliated with the organization, then let me lead you to the guidelines about conflict of interest; writing about yourself, your organization, etc. is generally not recommended. Regards, +p.s. u smell!!!hahahahahahahaha lol +Hello, From Nabbobhai - About Cialis (Cialis Drug History) I'm new to Wikipedia, and I recently added a paragraph to wikipedia about Cialis. I just checked the wikipedia and saw that the contribution I made to the wikipedia requires citation. I'm not sure how to site my contribution properly because I tried a numerous times to add the link to the source, but someone always removes it, probably you. So, could you please help me in properly citing the paragraph, or maybe you could add the source for me. I acquired the information from the following website, (www.buydrugs247.com). Thank you for your help. Oh yeah, my name is Nabeel Rahman, and I'm looking forward to learn how to properly use wikipedia. Err.. you can find a better source then buydrugs247.com. That site exists to sell something. Try to find an academic source to add. Try using a search engine, you can and should find better and more reliable sources —— Eagle (ask me for help) +"Thom Hartmann states that in Germany, ""... people fill in hand-marked ballots, which are hand-counted by civil servants, watched over by volunteer representatives of the political parties. ... It's totally clean, and easily audited. And even though it takes a week or more to count the vote ... the German people know the election results the night the polls close because the news media’s exit polls, for two generations, have never been more than a tenth of a percent off."" Unfortunately he's wrong. Generally all votes are counted (twice) by midnight. Then the preliminary final results are announced and the candidates who won are contacted so they can state whether they accept their seats or not. They have a week to reply and then the final results are announced; it's got nothing to do with counting votes for a week (btw. the final result of the election as a whole can take even more time because somtimes some precincts vote later than the other. This year a candidate died in Dresden after the ballots had been finalised and therefore the precinct voted two weeks(?) later " +" Huh? You want an alias added for ""Columbia""? This entire post is confusing. Where do you see or used in articles? And what do you want done? " +In agreement; hopefully 'others' will take interest in this topic. Thus, we'd be able to break the stalemate. +and the largest - the 1996 swing was smaller than the 2007 one or any of the other above three. Orderinchaos +Sanhedrin proper surely lapsed with the Churban of 70CE, if not earlier. All the 3rd century stuff was no longer the real thing. - talk/email +It's implied in the blog post that there were a good few years between Kimsua first making the sauce, it becoming a small family business, and the creation of those brands. If I have time I might try to hunt down that magazine article; it should be enough of an WP:RS to base the article on. +January 2012 (UTC) hi, Voceditenore. can you please help me? a user by the name of: ukexpat keeps vandalizing my article and despite my warnings to him not to do so, he keeps vandalizing. and when i go back to edit my article back to its original copy, i get blocked from it. why is this happening? thers another user called: Jim1138 .. and he says that i lack references on my article. but thats impossible since i provided all the references upon the subject. again, i ask that you please help me, i'm new here and i dont understand why the victim is blocked from his own article. who can i appeal this to? 01:43, 27 +" She has always been billed from Denver from my memory. The people who are reverting it to LA are wrong, but we do need a video reference to back it up otherwise it will keep on being reverted. !! a Punk !! " +" Oh yeah. I'm having a blast.White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine " +asshole fuck you asshole +" I have note all the information on my page and intend to lodge a compliant against you and request recall. You yourslef have stated ""He seems bent on my protection rationale - not the best,"" He is a she FYI. Had you read the information on the Biographies_of_living_persons you would see the person making claim clearly has no case and is clutching at straws! I dont understand how stating that something was printed has turned into this ? I dont get why you would get together with people to ban me for fake reasons ? Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keilana""" +I also opposed the inclusion of Ovadia Yosef, but I also think, there is no need for two writers / prosaists in the collage. Therefore I proposed (s. above) to replace one of them, either Kafka or Sholem Aleichem, with someone from a different field, e.g. Leonard Bernstein. Alternatively, I would also propose Janusz Korczak to have someone related to the Holocaust. +Yea faggot, like you don't like people remove things on your talk page, I don't like you reverting my page! Stop calling people a puppet! +I have to agree with Callanecc, and it occurs to me, OccultZone, that I did warn you that further accusations of sockpuppetry against these users would be considered to be personal attacks. ​— ​ +Commons images and my nom to picture of the day Thanks for the tip and for fixing my nom. I appreciate it very much. And for fixing the links on my talk page too! Best. - +Help for template Hello, I've seen your name on the project template and I permis myself to ask you help: I've just created a new portal Portal:Lyon and I would like to create the templates for the subways, trams, bus. They already exist on the french wikipedia of Lyon metro for example. would you accept to help me ? Thank you +Recent Edit warring In recent Past You warned me for calling mezzomezzo a Wahabi but the new allegation on me is baseless.There are editors like mezzo mezzo who are continuously disallowing editing Wahabi ,Ahle Hadees pages to other editors according to their personal hidden agenda.I tried with verifiable sources to put its relation with Terrorism and am also discussing it with editors but mezzo mezzo just reverted it on the baseless pretext of one or other.To speak truth is not personal Attack.I have good faith calling him something to which he supports. +" Nonsense 'There is one known feature from The Sims 1 Expansion, (Superstar) and how they have the feature were you're a celebrity (from reaching the top of a acting or music career or so then by people noticing you in the neighborhood.' Huh? This needs cleanup. flash; " +" There was a lengthy discussion here (n.b., I'm not joking when I say ""lenghty"", please be careful if attempting to read it all) where some editors involved agreed that citing the film as a primary source is acceptable and others did not. There is a template (Template:Cite video) that can be used to cite a video available though a URL but, obviously, you'd have to be sure that the URL steers clear of Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Personally, I would suggest not to use the film as a source for this sort of thing because secondary sources are always better, if available. Also, you want to avoid violating WP:SYNTH which is done when you present a conclusion that you reached yourself by citing a primary source. But, if you do decide to cite the film as a source, you can use reference #68 from this version of Children of Men as a guide of how to format a citation to the actual film. (talk • contribs) " +Cardinal Langley School As you will see I have undone the reference to a crime committed many years ago and which is in no way relevant AT ALL to the school becoming a comprehensive!!!! +St John's College, University of Sydney Hi, do you have any other information to add to the St John's College, University of Sydney page? Cheers +S9arthur should be blocked! He has only claimed to be right in every instance, not letting others contribute. He has deleted any change made by other editors. I suggest that if he believes he should have full control, he should make his own website. This is an online encyclopedia community, where we are supposed to work together. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cannock. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tomayres " +Without keeping a redirect..   (talk • contributions • email) +Ahem Didn't you know that i have an australian accent, if you ever see i, leave it alone, I can't speak normally. Oh, don't be silly. You're writing, not speaking. +Hi Graeme, I remember having an edit war with you over the DUKW..heh heh XD. On a serious note, great Idea. But There should be a British tank as the first picture, as that would suit the origin far better. +" SAS reserve I believe the unit Collins was attached to was Group B 21 SAS in Dulwich South London before I joined in the early eighties. 23 SAS is in Glasgow and very unlikely where the London based actor would be.  Chat  " +" Torikaebaya Monogatari‎ What? A twelfth century novel does not fall under the purview of the novels project? Sing " +" The ""Rumor"" concerning the albums cover This was not a rumor. It was true. I don't know how one would prove it except to get one of the original album covers. My brother showed it to me in 1968. It was quite obvious once you knew to look. The faces were camouflaged in the bark at the top of the tree. It was clearly a reference, a comment, and an inversion of the Beatle’s Sergeant Pepper album, which John Wesley Harding musically was as well, being a retreat from the sonic experimentation fueled by ""Pepper"" and a return or a retreat to a simpler, sound. " +" No matter how slowly your brain damage requires you to speak, ""Obviously"" doesn't qualify as an argument. You didn't knows that? Well, now you do. And if you want to know what WP:UNDUE really means, and if you can handle the big words, you might try actually reading it, or you could just look up the page where I explain it to Kerani. (HINT: UNDUE and WEIGHT are both shortcuts to the same paragraph of NPOV.) Now, he said he understood, but I understand you may require more help. Let me know and I'll try to get it across to you in smaller words. " +" Why? It just took me 25 seconds to load it. You should consider those of us who don't have the benefit of broadband. 308 kilobytes is a bit much. — " +" I agree with that “Georgian scripts“ would be a better title, or perhaps “Georgian alphabets” or “Georgian writing” (although this might be confused with Georgian literature). I certainly agree with the proposer that the present name is unsatisfactory, as the article covers three distinct scripts, and at least alludes to the existence of more than one mkhedruli alphabet. That said, I don’t have a strong objection to “Georgian script”, which would at least be an improvement, and seems to line up with the Latin and Cyrillic articles (the latter seems to me particularly worth emulating) in comprising a range of regional & historical varieties.—1479 " +Re File:Moulin de Maintenay - 2011-06-23.jpg and User:Bulwersator/Echo/Images/Rivers Is it watermill on Authie? (see de:Authie (Fluss)) +" Oh, and again, wild claims with no backing from Salmaan bhai.The phrases ""Kar"" and ""Sevak"" are both Sanskrit. Last time I checked, Sanskrit dates back to Vedic Hinduism, about 4000 years before Sikhism even existed. " +This article doesn't suppose to focus on defining consciousness, it only supposed to describe the aspects of consciousness what are relevant for AC, and why they are relevant. I don't know whether AC would exactly be a superset, but I think that it would describe that what is objective, and therefore most likely common in different possible types of consciousness. I don't also see why R2-D2, C-3P0 and HAL are artificial consciousness, and don't see the reason why they were added. I added Vanamonde, what I think is a good example of AC, and Jane, what was mentioned to be artificial sentience. Who thinks R2-D2, C-3P0 and HAL should be there, may explain. 10:10, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC) +Wrong Strauss The summary block at the bottom of the page says Johann Strauss II, not Josef Strauss. Is that a cut-n-paste error? +Can we get a picture? Are we talking about the same Julian? +Reduction== I have sourced as much as I can find (I'll keep sourcing if I find something else). Now I would like to reduce the section to make the article a little more bearable (of course, moving everything over to the History of Norfolk, Virginia article. Should I just summarize? == +" A barnstar for you! The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar Thank you for deciding to unblock me , I am very greatful and i hope i will be able to improve and contribute to Wikipedia; however, What is happening about the ""adoption"" process? " +Either way, you should unprotect the article and fix it the way it should be. I don't have time for Wikipedia nerd games. +Jewish or German? So, since Hefner is a German surname - is he of German or Jewish heritage? +"Actually to clarify....after Bret Hart was forced to vacate the world title(and retire) due to a concussion, the planned Hart vs Sid Vicious title match was changed less than 48 hours before the match to Sid vs Benoit. Since there was no time to build up the match it was decided to do a screwjob finish, and then build to the rematch at Superbrawl the next month. So benoit ""won"" the match(with Sid's leg clearly on the ropes), and then the next night on Nitro the decision was overturned. The official result of the Sould Out 2000 Main Event was ""Chris Benoit and Sid Vicious fought to a no-contest"". End of story. Except not. Pissed off at the shitty booking, Benoit confronted booker Kevin Sullivan(who benoit had a personal history with re: Nancy). Sullivan then told Benoit if he didn't like the booking he could ask for his contract release no questions asked. benoit took him up on it and jumped to the WWF. The difference between this and the millions of other screwjob/Dusty finishes was that rather than the belt seemingly moving from one champion to the next, then being handed back....the bgelt was vacant before Benoit ""won"" the title, thus the overturning of the decision made the belt vacant once more. Sid also had a seeming title victory only for the result to be overturned due to his ""pinning the wrong Harris"". Officially at the time the belt went from Hart to a vacant state to Kevin Nash awarding the belt to himself........ Okay, so Vinnie Mac has bought at WCW and recognised both Benoit's and Sid's first wins as World Title Wins. He has also recognised Hulk Hogan's two AWA Dusty Finishes as official World Title Wins. I don't like it, but I guess it's official now. The obvious question is, since Vince owns WWE, WCW, ECW and AWA can he, say overturn David Arquette's WCW World Title win at this point? That's just stupid. The Sandman The Sandman won the ECW Championship FIVE times, not one as the article shows! WWA World Title Where did it go? " +vandalism excuse me, that was not vandalism. i have made a new flag for one of the axis countries and that constitutes vandalism? geez no wonder wikipedia needs more money to help keep track of page changes and why no one edits wikipedia anymore. my first time editing and rejected by someone? what kind of isolationist attitude is this? +" Well, it now appears I am fighting against two deceivers instead of just a single one. So the difference between her ""maintaining"" that she contracted herpes from adult filming activities and her ""actually"" contracting herpes from adult filming activities is ""huge""? Is it in fact that huge, or is simply perceived by you to be huge? Is it honestly or dishonestly perceived by you to be huge? Is it honestly perceived by you to be small, but dishonestly communicated by you to the public to be huge? Your reasoning skills are mediocre, which is why you should stick to using Wikipedia as a ""free-speech"" (read propaganda) tool and refrain from actually publishing anything on paper that may be handed down to future generations, considering that anyone would do the world the disservice of actually publishing anything produced by you. Veritas, Semper " +" ""September 5th"" minus ""August 28th"" = ""a minute or two."" I shouldn't have been ""surprised""." +Thank you for your suggestion. Please explain to me how after checking the last few thousands of both of your edits, and the first five hundred of each too, and finding that all of your edits are of the same manner even though the articles vary wildly and are unrelated therefore, that I should not believe you are a Single Purpose Account. I did not read through every single edit, but I read through five pages of five hundred and only of the namespace article, and did not see a significant number (I think you had two, in 2500, and my guess is that it is representative since you started and ended in the same manner) of edits outside of that purpose (which is cleanup). The tags stay, since you are a Single Purpose Account, simple isn't it? +Thanks for your comments in this matter. I can garantee that all the images are mine. The few pictures from the Bankstown Bunker article were taken from a website where the owner of that article gave me permission via email. The email was copy and pasted into some permission thing on commens. I can prove that all the images are mine. I cannot do to much on the computer at the moment becuase I am at work. I will return in the evening. +" Theme song? I have been watching CNN for some 12 years and I really want to know what is the name of the current ""apocalyptic"" sounding theme song and who did it." +Assault Weopons Ban Greetings. I just wanted to let you know that I provided a 3O at the assault weapons ban page, but you got to the 3O talk before I could remove it. If you still wish to provide a 3O, you are of course absolutely welcome. Cheers, +The Entire Canonical New Testament paragraph is wrong == There are no specific references to Lesbians. The Romans verse is talking about something Women are doing, but is only specified as Gay when Men do it. Clearly Anal sex is what's in mind. But not all agree any of these verses condemn Homosexuality at all, just specific Pagan practices. == +he is a real bastard . he is a spy of Pinarayi and doing work for pinarayi . oneday the people will realise this . Who he is ? is he a military officer to save the nation ? or a scientist ? or a farmer? who is he real bastard +" Sure. I don't have the necessary knowledge to correct these sections. The most egregious error is the following statement: ""His system of government, which may be described as a benevolent despotism, was perhaps that best suited to the character of his subjects."" This passive construction raises the questions: benevolent for whom? described by whom? It implies that the Montenegrins were unable to govern themselves and needed a wise father to gently raise them into civilization. If this is true, it needs a citation, but I'm sure there were plenty of trade unionists and republicans who disagreed at least slightly ;-) The following phrases read as excessively fawning, slightly biased or perhaps just worded in an old-fashioned style: ""the young highlander, whose keen patriotism, capability for leadership and poetic talents early displayed themselves, showed no inclination for the pleasures of the French capital, and eagerly looked forward to returning to his native land."" ""He gave Montenegro its first constitution in 1905 following pressure from a population eager for more freedom."" ""King Nikola was gifted with a fine physique and a commanding presence, was a successful military leader and a graceful poet"" I hope this helps so that someone who has the knowledge to do the edits can update the article accordingly." +if they destroy each other they both don't live up to it. irresistable force means nothing can stop it. immovable means the object can't be moved. in both cases beign destroyed contradicts that. something like that means it was a powerful force meeting an equally resistant object. the problem is the adjectives that are absolute. just like the god examples and the greek dog. god can't be absolute if he can't do everything. creating something he can't oppose is something so if he can't do it he isn't absolute but then if he can then he isn't abosolute because he can't oppose it and so can't do everything. Laelaps was a dog that always gets what it hunts but Jupiter turned it into a static star while it was hunting a fox. since it can't ever move again it can't ever catch the fox and so it doesn't always get what it hunts. +I wanna remove this user from wikipedia +what is this inquiry based on? you seem to not understand the sentence that i wrote. also, you may want to see this diff where i explain that i am editing wikipedia since 2003. 212.200.205.163 +":Now I've checked, and, unfortunately for ""true"" enthusiasts, Steinberg does not call this work a ""true choral symphony"". He calls it, in fact, ""more a cantata than a symphony in the ordinary sense"" (p. 655). (Hard for a piece to be a ""true choral symphony"" if it's not even a ""true"" symphony.) There is evidence that Vaughan Williams would have agreed with Steinberg and was using the term symphony in the title more or less figuratively, roughly in the manner that Stravinsky later used it in his Symphony of Psalms. From Ursula's biography, p. 95: ""On of my [Ralph Vaughan Williams's] most grateful memories of George [Butterworth] is connected with my London Symphony....he [Butterworth] said in his characteristically abrupt way: 'You ought to write a symphony.' From that moment [a ""moment"" well past the composition and first performances of A Sea Symphony] the idea of a symphonya thing which I had always declared I would never attemptdominated my mind."" " +Which theories make testable predictions is debatable..and will be debated! +"why the hell are they called ""boxer"" " +"@Shiitalker - I get it. The 2012 page is about all the doomsday bullcrap and the ""truth"" about 2012 doesn't belong on that page at all. The fact that Jenkins is hyping 12.21.2012 as the ""end date"" qualifies him to be featured on that page. He is truly a disengenous charlatan. I really do get it. Interested in starting a page about the authentic Maya forecasts as documented in the Dresden Codex? There are astronomical facts in the codex for events in 2012. This is all ""scientifically"" verifiable. The numbers do not lie. Are you deep enough into Buddhism to understand what a ""terma"" is? Some of the major dates in the codex happen to coincide with events in the life of Padmasambhava. ~*~ M ~*~ " +ClueBot ClueBot is a incredibly crappy piece of software. Mr Vernon +So this looks like a vendetta. It is stupid. You are pissing me off. This is not what we are here for. (talk - contribs) +What was the article? Looks like it was fully deleted; do you remember or have a saved copy of that article? Sounds hilarious just from the title alone. +World View or Polish View? Following the nationality thread discussion at the WikiProject Poland page I thought it might be salutary to bring this link to this page (second paragraph on). +Enclaves and new civil liberties I removed the third link of Tinker v. Des Moines. Why do we need the 2nd one? (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) In the 1960's comma (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) In the landmark O'Connor v. Donaldson decision, in 1975,->In the landmark 1975 O'Connor v. Donaldson decision, (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) Did the ACLU work with Arthur Eve in New York? (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) +Poke. That's more than a month ;) — Martin ( · talk) +Portal Every time I go to create the portal on Sydney, it redirects to Australia's portal, what do I do? I'm willing to create one and wish to be able to do so. Your help would be greatly appreciated. +LETS TRY AGAIN WITHOUT DENNIS BROWN LYING +" Replaceable fair use Image:VmaxBike.JPG Thanks for uploading Image:VmaxBike.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tast " +", 10 Jan 2004 (UTC) Addendum: the whole sentence says anyway that ""[socialists consider this label] a smear tactic employed with the sole motive..."", so it's highly NPOV to add the judgement about this consideration in the ""historical context"" clause, which therefore should just be deleted. 15:50" +you had no right to do that,. You have no respect for people what so ever. You have no respect for people what so ever. +I don't know if you are aware but sending e-mail via the Wikipedia system (link shows up on the left of a user talk page after you enable e-mail) provides the same degree of anonymity that you get as User:MangoWong. Some people setup dedicated e-mail accounts for Wikipedia. +March 2011 (UTC) Humph... In the last two years of using wiki I have been blocked once. Not several times. Once. With regard to my talk page, yes I do frequently erase it - because I do not want it becoming clogged with useless trivia, much as I do not want to have to read through subjective journalistic opinion in the heading paragraphs of famous people. 16:27, 7 +DKW racing engine of the 1930s I remember reading about a DKW racing motorcycle engine with three cylinders but one combustion chamber. In essence, the two outside cylinders were mounted vertically and formed a Twingle or split-single unit, while the middle cylinder was mounted horizontally (facing forward in the frame), had a larger bore and a smaller stroke, and was essentially a supercharger for the other cylinders. Does anyone have any documentation for this engine? I think the motorcycles it powered were successful racers at the time. +" The consensus agreed on earlier was that the NTSB briefings *are* an authoritative source (and rightly so!), they do not need to be separately quoted by 3rd party media/press refs, let alone by questionable blog postings or other ""online media"". And yeah, I'd expect people to actually have seen all NTSB briefings, otherwise they have really NO reason whatsoever to bother reviewing stuff here - if anybody can't be bothered to watch the NTSB briefings, then please just read the transcripts. Frankly, it is beyond me how you guys are tolerating this type of workflow and behavior, even perceiving me stating that as an ""attack"". How can it be an ATTACK to expect people to be familiar with the topic they're contributing to ? Honestly, all this goes to show the weaknesses and shortcomings of crowd-sourced encyclopedia-writing, there's no proper hierarchy, and if there's one, it's one where seniority and stylistic aptitude count more than a factual background. Yeah, this is kinda disappointing. " +" errors Windows 2000 Professional have many errors. I know, because I has Windows 2000 Professional in my computer, and... My cousin spoke me, someone worked a paper on www pages, but suddenly he overhear odd voice, and this a overheear voice spoken: ""You turn off a www pages, else you never turn off it's computer"". It's error in a translation adress, and many errors in protected. Alden(Sharon boyfriend) or talk " +" Charmbracelet Hi MariAna Mimi! I've reverted your addition to Charmbracelet. If you disagree with my edit, feel free to discuss the issue out. Thank you for your contributions. (talk) " +Yes, I felt that seeing as most people know Elizabeth Woodville was the ancestor of all the English monarchs after 1509, it was redundant to mention it, but as you rightly pointed out, it appeared to be an oversight, so thank you for drawing my attention to it. +Personal attack and baiting by Crockspot noted. +The image on the front of wikisource: has not changed. The new image at Image:Wikisource-nt.png appears to be used in their version of the Signpost and has not yet been adopted for the project as whole, as far as I can tell. Note image disagreement in the history of the Wikisource article. - Tree +Bai You're really nice and I like you a lot ;) (winkyface) +" The headlines for Global Warming hysteria articles are often like that. It would be same as saying if a US President opposed radical action on Global Warming saying ""300,000,000 American opposed to action on Global Warming"" because the leader says so." +" Besides nowhere in CSD#F9 it says: ""The seven-day waiting period for untagged images is only for cases where there is at least a realistic chance that the tagging might bring with it a satisfactory source/license declaration"". " +James an estranged that blocked me Who are you? ? Why are you annoying me? What did I done for you? What I have offensive to you? Tell me. 103.9.114.58 +" Butterfly removal of article link I posted a link to my review of Butterfly, and you removed it as unnecessary. But the ""Allmovie"" link remains, and it doesn't even work. Why is a review from DVDTalk any less worthy than from Allmovie? And why is a review of a film an ""unnecessary"" link when I see them linked on many, many other Wikipedia entries? You can email me at mavismaumee@aol.com. Thank you." +" Is anti-Semitic soapboxing like the above allowed on Wikipedia? ""An explanation of Israeli racism you can find"" Wickey-nl. ""Cleansed and proper Israel"" Wickey-nl. Usually Sean.hoyland removes soapboxing, but he seems to have missed this instance. If someone were to post an anti-Muslim or even merely a pro-Jewish comment, it would have been cleansed already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:F241:7A00:14EE:70C7:8203:47DC " +Paranoia and parasitic infections. Question the validity of this statement. Other common paranoid delusions include the belief that the person has an imaginary disease or parasitic infection (delusional parasitosis); that the person is on a special quest or has been chosen by God; that the person has had thoughts inserted or removed from conscious thought; or that the person's actions are being controlled by an external force. My research, suggests that infections, including parasitic ones can result in symptoms of paranoia. The bodies reaction to a real threat of attack on the micro level. Look up organic infections of paranoia. Then there is the case of prescription drugs that cause this symptom... Levaquin side effects +" Edits by I just cleaned up a heavy POV edit from last year by user , who used words like ""Iemma Government's failure"" and described Berejiklian as ""proven very effective"". I note that a Brad Burden is among the Liberal Party staffers thanked in a NSW Liberal member's 2005 speech ... 121.44.44.45 " +I got my data about Dodd designing the Chat. house on 4th Street from a house rehabilitation info banner in front of the blue house at the corner of 4th & Belgravia Ct. It states that Dodd designed the house for jeweler Joseph Wyrne. I can upload a picture of the banner if you want it. My landlord was also state that Dodd is the designer of the Chat. grouping. +That add is now back with no way of removing it only making it smaller. I will never donate to wikipedia now cause of this. +I don't actually know but I say 3 Pikachu or lots of Pikachus. Definate number of Pika~ = Pikachu, indefinate number = Pikachus. Celestianpower hab +Yes you stupid asshole, it does count. Just because it's not mentioned on the screen does not mean it's canon. Like WyrmKing said earlier, Nathan Petrelli's sons' names weren't mentioned on the script but the credits showed their names. Does that mean, they didn't have names? 800 series is T-800. Merchan-fucking-dise says it's T-800. The writers says it's T-800. The creature desginer, Stan Winston says it's T-800. It's fucking T-800. T-fucking-800. +" re: ""edit warring"" I am putting the cities in the best order. Please also send this warning to him (203.175.65.169. " +Glkanter & The 'Cat' Quote I see I left off the name of the editor I quoted, who posted the diff with the 'meow' stuff. It came from Rick Block. I have added that info to my page. Sorry for the confusion. +Arjun MBT You can express your opinion in the Arjun MBT talk page. +"==Proper notation of PIE phonemes== People here are confused between how phonemes are represented in attested languages versus protolanguages. While it's true that, for example, a proto-sound like *p is a ""phoneme"" and that it may be represented as */p/ when pronounced as such, it's not true that these symbols are simply interchangeable with IPA notation. The phoneme *h2 **CANNOT** be represented in IPA notation as */h2/ whatsoever because ""h2"" is not a valid IPA symbol! Depending on the theories of the IEist in question regarding the pronunciation of *h2, however, the sound may be represented as some universally recognized IPA symbol (such as /x/, for example, a velar fricative). Mixing up these notations belies vast ignorance of the topic. Less editing, more reading. 24.78.208.183 " +This is the perfect place for such a discussion. It is entirely within the context of the main article and its previous absence was a serious omission. +" Exactly...WP:NOTNEWS (talk→  ←track) " +I'm certain Mr. Garrison would agree 100% +Support As a practicioner who has used IDEF in the past, that is how I would search for it and I would refer to it. While the arguement surrounding UML and BPMN is a good one, these acronyms are commonly known by about 30% of the practioner community in spelled out form. I would place the level at below 5% for IDEF. I think this Google Trends page illustrates this point nicely. +This is your last warning; stop being an asshole. +So as to not talk about you behind your back... Please don't hesitate, for my benefit, to delete this after you've read it. I feel that it's only fair to tell you that I mentioned you on Talk:Michael Roach. I don't think I said anything you'd disagree with, and I'm not proposing that you need to respond there, but don't want to give the impression that I'm talking about you behind your back. +I have reverted it for the second time. It looks cluttered, it looks ugly and I don't really see what encyclopedic value it has. Knowing the time-span of the series has very little value overall i.e. the Batman series made neglible revenue prior to 1989. If readers want this information year film is labelled with the year of release. +That's it. Remember last time you fucked with me... the dildo, your ear, all that blood. You've given me no choice but to repeat the punishment. This time it will be a 12 incher. +" Advertisement Since when did Wikipedia advertise? ""Wakestock is Europe's largest wakeboard music festival, combining the cultures of music and the world's fastest growing watersport in a weekend of high-octane excitement!""" +The problem is a false problem because with the common sense the Movimento Libertario ever does not contest the use of these images on Wikipedia pages relating to members of its argument the ML. Bye. +Vergée Hi, You contributed to Talk:Vergée. I agree it was ambiguous. I did some research and have tried to improve the article. Several people are trying to raise the standard of all unit articles. The discussions are in several places, but you may with to look at Talk:Units of measurement. +Fake felafel I remove the fake felafel insert by nsaum because it not real. The gilabrand user also agree that it not belong. +Railway frequency chart Any one add citation for the frequency of trains in Vijayawada. Here is the link [] +" No problem. Thanks for taking this one on. As you probably relised (and can see by its article history) it has been the source of a surprising ammount of drama.  (talk) " +" (UTC) Belated answer about church population: I daresay a large proportion of the US members who were blessed, received international matchings. For example, American man and Japanese woman. Also, foreign couples (as in two Asians) might also have participated in that mass wedding. So the number of couples isn't precisely indicative of US church membership at the time. I can always ask Tyler Hendricks, who served as vice president for personnel before he was selected US church president. He'd have the old database. All I know is that in 2003, we had around 5,600 to 5,800 adult (""first generation"") members on file at church HQ; I know, because Hendricks gave me the list then. 02:42, 16 June 2009" +" Please review WP:CIVIL specifically, ""Taunting; deliberately pushing others to the point of breaching civility even if not seeming to commit such a breach themselves."" Again, MSM does not refer to biological sex... how would one even define that? as covered in the TS/TG articles already, there is no ""biological sex"". What is the biological sex of a woman with CAIS? Is she MSM just because she has a Y chromosome and sleeps with men? No, MSM refers to specific behaviors that MSM have, and TS/TG do not. TS/TG have different behaviors that still tend to put them in the risk column. Now, to kind of give a rough gross and entirely unscientific example, if BBL Theory were true, then autogynephiles would be MSM, but homosexual transsexuals would not... um. Ok, homosexual transsexuals would not be MSM post-surgery. I'm sorry, but my ""biological gender"" is female. There is no doubt in my mind that I had insufficient androgens during my natal period and came out under-virilized. When the brain (evidenced by my parents that I never acted correctly as a ""boy"") and the external body are in conflict... personally, I can't, and I don't know why you could, say that the external body wins out. " +" Okay, , I think I've read everything relevant. No, I do not think you were too harsh. Some of his edits have been a bit uncontructive and the ""Aneditor"" deception was exactly what it looked like, deception. If you are worried, you can always play it safe in the future by being deliberately less harsh, and then seeing what the response is. That keeps the options open just like vandal warning levels do. It gives the recipient a chance to see where things are headed and the onus is on them to correct. If they don't, you will have been patient and have given due warnings. Further, being more harsh than appropriate means you've done something wrong, and you cannot easily go backward from that. However, if you are under harsh, you can always go the next step if needed. While we are on the topic of this editor, could you do a copyvio check for me? I can't access the .fr site. Cheers, " +Missed the survey and can't find a place to comment above, but the images certainly do seem in keeping with the encyclopedic purpose of the page - how else would we illustrate a page about a series of pictures than to have the pictures? Keep 'em. (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex +GA nomination I've nominated the article for GA status. If you haven't contributed signicantly, feel free to leave a review. +If this were a pop culture blog, would it be relevant to have a section about somebody's guest post on Lady Gaga? IF so, what would you write then? +hey im will.b the rapper please check out my youtube and face book page thankshttp://www.youtube.com/channel/UCflzZavQgQbHuOXYzP93xSg?feature=watch +" Such intransigent behaviour is not compatible with Wikipedia's policies of consensus-building and collaborative editing; it only serves to incite edit wars. Anyway, could you please explain why you consider the referece a ""strawman"" and ""unnecessary""? We are talking about Einstein, a well-known socialist, a household name, and the epitome of intelligence. Also, after reading my previous comment (and the source), are you still contending that socialism isn't opposed to individualism? Your substitute is not adequate, either: therefore, it is asserted by some critics that socialistic is less individualistic. Firstly, the use of a weasel words is strongly discouraged at Wikipedia; please read WP:AWW for more information. Secondly, socialism is less individualistic than what? This entry is quite ambiguous. Finally, I have a reputable source to defend my edit, whereas you do not. Overall, your edit violates two Wikipedia policies: No Orginal Research and Avoid Weasel Words. " +" Ignorance If I were a Japanese female I would be extremely offended by the above paragraph. The claim to know what ""Everyone"" thinks is very conceited. Since most women fall into one of the categories listed above, the writer has insulted the entire nation of Japan by stating that the current population is, or is decended from, prostitutes. As for Japanese culture, it is alive and well. Imagine what it would have been like under Communism. If the writer believes that Japan was better off in 1940 than it is today, tell that to all the Japanese woman that now have the right to vote. Tell that to Japanese women that have become engineers and politicians, making Japan one of the most powerful nations in the world all without the use of arms." +If you want to claim POV, good faith obliges you to specify your claims on the discussion pages for the article. I'm afraid you aren't going to substantiate these changes by claiming that ADL and Lipstadt are inherently POV, nor are you going to succeed in claiming that it is inherently POV to say Irving was discredited. You have contributed nothing to the discussion on the article and cannot expect a great deal of credibility without making arguments on the discussion pages to back edits that are contrary to evident consensus apparent on the discussion pages. +. I wasn't trying to harass anyone or be annoying. +Threats I suggest that you cease to issue threats as you did on my talk page. +Stop it im done with you people like you keep talking bad things about me i dont want 50 people harrassing me +Actually there was just an RFA quite recently that was so marred with drama that Giggy was forced to withdraw. That was while Giggy was Dihydrogen monoxide. I don't think Giggy will be running for quite some time. I'm an Editorthewiki[citation needed] +Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. | talk If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +" Adoption Yes, I would be happy to adopt you. Please add this userbox to your page: Ask me any questions you may have on my talkpage, or you can email me at walton_m@hotmail.co.uk. ton Vivat Regina! " +" It would be interesting, Mr. 107, to complain of socks, given that your only edit to Wikipedia was to this article. Belt " +" You just said ""there is no meaning"". |☺ " +But that has only a marginal effect on the Julian dates on which the Jews observe new moon. The major factor is the rule that there are only four days of the week on which the year can begin, and this imbalance is transmitted throughout the year. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Water cycle. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. | Talk " +Even first year students would not produce such bad data. Measuring equipment usually has error less than 1% these days. I suggest you give a table of observed data, calculated data and residuals if you don't want to do a graphic. +The article names Naff twice, in connection with his opinions; it does not name Michael Musto (who does have his own article) or refer to Musto's opinions. Editors can speculate like anyone else, but there is a distinction between opinion and fact. +" Four Core Issues? In the article's second paragraph, I found this: ""PETA focuses on four core issues: factory farming, vivisection, animal testing, fur farming, and animals in entertainment."" Uh...that's five. PETA focuses on four core issues: factory farming (1!), vivisection (2!), animal testing (3!), fur farming (4!), and animals in entertainment (5!). See? " +REDIRECT Talk:James Kirkland (paleontologist) +Unfair Blocking I wanted to protest in no uncertain terms that you have been extremely unfair in blocking only me. Abhishek is equally guilty if not more guilty than me yet he gets away with a pep talk & i get blocked. besides that i have always maintained that he is entitled to his opinion but facts are different like the image on august kranti & surat station. do i really need to have the time to go into so much detail about everything? can he explain why he undid the image on surat station despite me having written that it is an incorrect image other than for ego reasons? he is just undoing my work because of ego problems. if you go through his history, he has even refused to accept a government of india notification & his history is full of edits of other people's work. now you may say that i am wrong. 1 person can be wrong but how can so many people be wrong & except him how many have actually removed anything that i have uploaded? He is more than welcome to add any relevant image on things where he considers my work irrelevant, i have yet to see anything on that front. 1 more thing. Every image that i have added has been taken my me which means that i have actually gone to the various places. Give me some credit for the effort i have taken with the intent to improve wikipedia. I have done my best to reason it out with him, to discuss something else on which we can agree- i have had no success there either. If you still believe i am wrong, then pls help me understand your reasoning why? It will help out a lot if i can see things from your point of vision. +@Ucucha (a) yes please, (b) yeah, maybe a bit heavy on the details -will trim ); @innotata - thanks for the heads up, much appreciated. Will look later today (after breakfast etc > 7.30 am here) (talk · contribs) +" Some Chinese propagandiasts desperately make Korean as language isolate, saying ""Most linguists say Korean is language isolate"" by the referece of The Korean Language(Song Jae Jung, p15), but there's no phrase like that. Stop distorting Chinese shits, Wikiepdia isn't a place for your propaganda. " +" Found the Answer! I'm back and after looking for a moment I found the answer of the title with source. The actual answer is: Bleach can mean both Ichigo's bleached hair as well as the shinigami's job of ""bleaching"" the sins of the Hollows and sending them to Soul Society. And there U Go! http://forums.animesuki.com/archive/index.php/t-27211.html (That's My Source) " +The new theory on how Titanic broke apart Just saw the special on the history channel. Rather interesting as they have found to complete sections of the double hulled bottom and have come to the conclusion the the Titanic broke from the bottom up, as opposed to the top down as portrayed in movies and described in most accounts. This is further supported on there by the fact that the breaks in the ship match this blah blah I have no clue what i'm talking about, but this is important shit and this article has nothing in it whatsoever about it. +" Sockpuppetry case Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. " +It appears to be impossible for me to move forward from this situation - see most recent work from Orlady here68.173.85.60 +this also ponders my imagination i say FUCK IT! FUCK SPLITTING THIS FUCKEDY ARTICLE. we'eve already fucked up this article and we do not need to fuck it anymore. please save any more fuck from happening. sincerely, a little fucker oh yeah bitch dats my cock right there, you know ma cock looks nice +Jason Greenberg It is felt that the article you created at Jason Greenberg is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, which must have a notable subject and be verifable. I have moved it to Chico24 +" [And good luck with your favored editors ChessplayerLev, MaxBrowne, and Mann jess. You accused me of ""encouraging"" Wiki brah to do damage to the encyclopedia or its editors. A false accusation. But you have no problem encouraging those other editors, who have been underhanded and abusively aggressive towards me, by your compliments. That kind of self-denial and hypocrisy is stunning, really. But not from the vantage point of abusive treatment. From that it makes total sense. I see right through it, Mr. Leader. You thought it wouldn't wear on me. You guessed wrong. Your opinion of my efforts here were important. You don't have any idea of how insulting and demoralizing you've really been to this editor. Unfairness is something I just can't deal with, and your active and permanent prejudice of me guarantees unfairness. I'm gone and want to be a ghost. Please don't make any more insults. I've had enough. [Isn't that clear?])" +" Italy???? Rome???? What the fuck has this got to do with anything we are talking about? You serbo-nationalists wanna go on your Italy page and discuss that. Evlekis, are you able to read??? Look at the following: ""An excellent scholarly contribution to the study of the province. . . . Seriously differs from the biased interpretations published by Serbian and Albanian historians, or trendy but shallow Western ""Kosovology experts."" —Canadian Slavonic Papers ""A thrilling detective story."" New York Times Book Review ""Excellent."" New York Review of Books ""A book every policy expert, journalist and lay person must read."" Wall Street Journal ""Malcolm's narrative is gripping, even brilliant at times ... He takes to his task with the vigor of a detective driven by true passion. At times his claims are, in terms of Balkan history, quite revolutionary."" Economist ""Cover(s) the whole history of Kosovo, with an authority that is often breathtaking and never oppressive."" Sunday Times ""Brilliantly researched and argued ... a magisterial work of history ... Kosovo will inevitably be received immediately as an immensely valuable contribution to our understanding and knowledge of a contemporary crisis. But to see the book as merely a contribution to the present-day debate is to do it a disservice. This is a profound and pioneering work which will endure for generations."" Times Literary Supplement In this awe-inspiring work, Malcolm has created a vital successor to his Bosnia: A Short History and an essential aid to anyone who wishes to understand this tragic region today...His book is exceptional not only for his unimpeachable rearch, but also for his equitable examination of the conflicting ethnic views of what really happened ... One can't help speculating on how a clear understanding of the information contained here might have affected the Dayton Accord and history. Publisher's Weekly, 4/20/98 By far the best available guide to the fatal steps to catastrophe. The New York Review of Books "". . .elaborately researched . . ."" Book World There you have it. Noel Malcolm is revered and aknowledged as a neutral and impartial historian. But just because he isn't on of your Serbo-bloggers, you come up with all this shit about his works. When he says ""conquered"", that is exactly what the term means. Your map is shit. Because Serbs ONLY MADE UP 25% of that land whether it was a bigger or smaller Kosova than today. And I call it KOSOVA because KOSOVA is it's name. It's Serbo-nationalists like you, Dab, and Balkanfever who keep it in it's Milosevic devized name. And you keep going on about the Treaty in London 1913. Well???? What happened???? Certainly nothing to do with Kosova joining Serbia because I said before and I'll say again - if it did, Malcolm would have said it. If he gets things wrong, why is he so well respected by all those reporters in the newspapers listed by Interestedinfairness. Answer that one. Dab, don't confuse the issue. It doesn't matter if Kosova was once it Italy, I tell you that it has never been in Serbia, it only had the bad luck to be in the same ""genocide state"" as Serbia when a part of Yugoslavia. The end. " +for your knowledge Regards +Please stop? Please? +Vandalism? No really, it is a warning template and you should leave it on your page page +"== Hello! == Hi AggressivePanda, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log. Good luck, and have fun. Wolf Feel free to ask me anything on my talk page- just click on the ""wolf"" part of my siggy & leave me a message." +Dungeon Hunter 5 Hey just asking why did you delete this information about the game? This is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, isn't it supposed to give *some* information about the topic? +What's going on here? This paragraph in the Alterations Between Versions section gave me a good chuckle: The Dutch translation of Good Omens contains an ironic preface ... Someone stuck citation needed on the end of a sentence that begins by citing its source. I'll delete the annotation, but felt compelled to preserve the joke here. +February 2006 (UTC) Hey, look, it's that image that's been uploaded and deleted by several sockpuppets of the banned user (talk • contribs), what a coincidence! 01:18, 7 +(See the first bullet) +" As far as I can tell, learned people don't express their opinions as either ""Vatican II is infallible"" or ""Vatican II is not infallible"". Everyone is pretty much agreed that ecumenical councils exercise their infallibility via the promulgation of dogmatic definitions, so the question really is whether Vatican II promulgated any dogmatic definitions. Even the famous Pope Paul VI quote that traditional Catholics always cite uses this terminology: “There are those who ask what authority, what theological qualification, the Council intended to give to its teachings, knowing that it avoided issuing solemn dogmatic definitions backed by the Church's infallible teaching authority. The answer is known by those who remember the conciliar declaration of March 6, 1964, repeated on November 16, 1964. In view of the pastoral nature of the Council, it avoided proclaiming in an extraordinary manner any dogmas carrying the mark of infallibility.” (General Audience, December 1, 1966, published in the L'Osservatore Romano 1/21/1966) " +"I have changed ""Lance Thomas"" to ""Lance Thomas"" to link to American Pro Basketball player mentioned in the Biography. " +archiving I noticed you posted a comment about archiving the userboxes to prevent against future rogue admins. Did you know this already exists? Wikipedia:Userboxes/Archive1 - by the way, this page is huge and could crash your browser. War +Remove. This map is just a political statement from the various so-called minorities trying to change the status-quo. No encyclopedic value at all and I haven't seen any convincing data supporting its existence. +Images Are any of these images usable on wikipedia? http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q;=joseph%20cafasso&sa;=N&tab;=wi +unblock me because I am sorry and will stop as of now +":And A ""SINGLE TOPIC"" poster who has never posted on any other issue . " +By the way, can I remove the accusation notice from my user page? +Look Xwomanizerx, Britney Spears does not know you. Take your hands of your keyboard, go outside and try to find yourself a real woman. Britney already has enough crazy fans chasing her - no wonder she started doing crazy things: getting married for 55 hours, driving a car with her son on her lap, shaving her head, getting tattoos, taking illicit substances, refusing to relinquish custody of her sons. Crikey - how many women are 29 years old and have mommy and daddy controlling her assets because she is not capable of doing so herself. Do her a favor, leave the poor girl alone. +Beaver Co. PA markers There are only two possibilities for the marker you showed me: it is either a local marker or the PHMC database is incomplete. After combing through the PHMC database, I have to say it seemed very up-to-date and complete, even listing very old missing markers.The shape and design of that marker suggests it is either not a PA state historical marker or it is a very old one. My guess is that it would be a local marker. +So enterprising of you Pm_shef. I wonder where you get this drive to fight your father's fights. I see you are following Bearcat's request of not being involved in Vaughan politics very closely. And how the admin user:Bearcat is enforcing that npov rule. It must be WikiHeaven. VaughanWatch +OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET!OH BOB SAGET![[''' +" I reverted your bold edit. I am not passing judgment on the actual edit, but on the principle that it is inappropriate to change an MOS to suit an active debate. Changes to the MOS should generally be discussed, but even more so when a debate on one page affects multiple pages going forward. (Contact me) " +dont mind this weapon giy he shall not be here mooch longer he is a jew hater that should not be here +" A little something for you... The Lonely Geek Barnstar This barnstar is in honor of your depressing, unloved presence on IRC on Valentine's Day, 2009. Roses and kisses work for some, but you, noble Wikipedian, have important things to discuss on the internet with people you barely know who you'll probably never meet. Here's to you! [[User_Talk:FlyingToaster|Toaster]] " +I responded. I think the thing is settled soon. There are really much more important issues around! Best regards (Talk) +" Bogus math In the ""Power quantities"" section, what's the point of asserting ""Lp = 0.5*ln(P/Po) = 10*Log(P/Po)"" when it is true only for the degenerative case: P == Po? Also, why term ""Po"" as ""reference power""? ""P"" & ""Po"" should be ""P1"" & ""P2"" (that is, any arbitrary power measurements). Likewise for the ""Field quantities"" section. " +" ""Obama was not aware that Rezko may have been doing anything illegal when accepting the campaign contributions."" Huh? How can you assume this? This is not a fact this is your impression of the situation. This article is totaly biased and spun to reflect Obama in a positive light. How is the Priest with a following of 8,000 people whom Mr. Obama chose to join in prayer not a HUGE part of his life? This is a storey of his good deads not abiography his life and what shapped him. I am totaly new to this, I am not a sock(whatever that is supposed to be?) or some fake account as SCjessey claims anyone whos opinion differs from his own must be. WTF I used to think Wiki was a good thing, but how can some fan boy be in charge of a page that people are looking to for information about who they might pick in an election. I came trying to get a grasp of who this guy Obama is because the media in the USA is selling copy using his name not telling us who he really is. Sadly I must continue to look for an unbiased source of facts as this wiki is far from unbiased." +This is total bull I HATE THIS WIKIPEDIA! I AM NOT ATTACKING OR HARASSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +(see here there are enough books writing about it) +"==Name== I've been studying Satmar for a good bit, and I've been to Kiryas Joel. I've never heard it called ""Sakmer"". Are we sure about this? I've been around many Hasidim for a long, long time too, and I have never heard of Sakmer either, so it may just be baloney and that word should be removed. there is a street in KJ called Sakmer also: look at this http://tovrent.com/satmar/85.jpg The reason some call it Sakmer is because the name Satmer is based on Satu Mare which remotely referes Saint Mary [NOTE - not true, Satu Mare means simply ""Large Village"" in Romanian!]. Hassidic Jews have always refrained from sanctifying Christian saints and therefore have created alternative names for quite a few cities. Izak love, when you don't know something, that does not make it balony. PS, I haven't been ""studying"" Satmer - I am one, and my maternal grandfather referes to his birthplace as Sakmer (AKA Satu Mare). PPS There is no KJ street called Sakmer. The photo you attached clearly dubbs the Satmar Rabbi ""The Rav of Sakmer"". For those who study Satmer but have no knowledge of the script which the Satmers use, the word is the one at the lower left corner looking something like this: סאקמער. The third letter from the right carries the K sound. Cheers. I recently heard in regular chatting from an acquaintence that an ancestor (great-grandfather?) of his called Satmar Sakmer. Why do they not utilize that term anymore? And, I'm done with my hardcore pshat study of different Hasidic groups. It's total nonsense, the 'saint mary' story. Satu Mare means 'large town'. My father has been there many times. Wikipedia (yes yes) also says that Satu Mare means 'large town', and that 'saint mary' is something else entirely in Hungarian/Romanian. I revised the opening paragraph by indicating the Satmars are one of the largest hasidic groups - it is widely thought there are about 200,000 Lubavitchers, but since none of the hasidic groups keeps a formal membership role, this is all conjecture - it would be incorrect for any group to claim they are the largest, there is no way of knowing. About Satmar and NETUREI KARTA. THe Cherem bit is incorrect, as is the bit of a denunciation. Also the part of asking Reb Yoilish to meet with Yasser Arrafat. It's all myth. Yasser Arafat and the PLO were not the public face of the Palestinian cause before Reb Yoilish had his stroke, so it doesn't make sense. I actually asked a chaver of the Satmar Beis Din about the Cherem, and he said it's nonsense. The Beis DIn has not publicly issued a cherem against a person or group of people since its formation in the United States. No denunciation was issued either. It's a made up propaganda piece by the Kakhnik radio station Arutz Sheva. It never happened. No such thing ever appeared in Der Yid, which is the official newspaper. Good edit Good recent edit, IZAK. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 5 July 2005 23:56 (UTC) Etymology with Satu coming from the same root as ""city"" (civitas) Actually, it's not like this. In Romanian, ""satu"" is derived from Latin ""fossatum"" and it originally meant a village encircled by a moat (in Latin ""fossa""). ""Cetate"" is the Romanian word derived from ""civitas"". | Talk NPOV People have mistaken this article to be a fork of HydePark.co.il. It is not. And due to its encylopaedic nature, please do not appeal to users to refrain from making a chilul Hashem, because, frankly, nobody gives a shite. The purpose of this site is informative, not Satmer's - or Judaism's - PR page, nor is it a private opinion venting station. If you are a member of this site, and its NPOV policy is not in accordance with your religious beliefs, you are kindly requested to hold your peace. State the true UNFILTERED truth, but only that, please. Aaron-Zalman Conflict Apparently someone has made this sub-section its own page again. Thoughts, anyone? Is it enough of an issue to have it be its own page, separate from Satmar the dynasty? ''''''you bet !!! this issue s +" Edit request from BravesFan2006, 3 May 2010 ""Gimmie That Girl"" spends its 2nd week at #1 for the chart week of May 15, 2010. Please add the May 15th entry. Thanks!! BravesFan2006" +Sorry for calling you a coward, but how exactly is creating a template stating that an article had been through previous VfDs then adding it to a page up for VfD vandalism? +" Licinius, the more you explain your position, the more I think you're reading something into the current wording that just plain isn't there. Saying Aussie Rules is an Australian variety of football does not say that it is more Australian than ""gridiron"" (NFL is the competition, not the game!) is American. It doesn't say that Australians haven't had great influence on rugby league. The descriptions of the sections don't need to be, and in fact shouldn't be in the same format, since the different groups are not exactly the same sort of groups. The different codes are grouped into sections based on their history and similarities between the codes. There are two very obvious big groups, both easily characterised by their ""ancestry"" - the kicking games descended from association rules and the carrying games descended from the rugby rules. The rest of the codes, all relatively minor in global terms, cannot be characterised by a single ancestry, and so shouldn't be. They are a group of games, some influenced by both soccer-type games and rugby school rules, with various influences within the group as well, that are most easily characterised by the fact that they are all Australian or Irish in origin. Saying some of them are Australian varieties of football is not saying the rugby codes are ""unAustralian"" any more than calling Gaelic football an Irish variety implies that Irish soccer players are not Irish/Gaelic! " +Reply sent to your email. +This is worth a comment at the Good article reassessment of this article, as it is a GA criterion. Geometry guy +REDIRECT Talk:Another One (album) +" You don't have to be an admin to warn vandals. Anybody can do that. And if you get WP:TWINKLE vandalism can be reverted easily as well. Yintaɳ  " +User:Lychon 21:36, 30 Jan 2006 (UTC) +And please don't just accept his word at face value because he is a chronic liar and exaggerator, who will say anything to get others banned and his point of view to win, as he even tried to get a Articles for deletion/Michael Richards Laugh Factory Incident request for deletion against an article he made by simplying accusing the creator of the request for deletion a sockpuppet. Fortunately, the debate for deletion was continued, but you can see how Netscott tries to abuse loopholes to prove a point and win arguments. }} +"::I re-wrote the intro today, changing passively-voiced sentences to the active voice, adding some details from the early to mid 20th century, toning down the worst of the superlatives, and generally tidying it up. I still think ""Land of the Morning Calm"" should be removed from the intro, as it has a boastful tone, Korea's not widely known by this name except among Koreans, and it's a misnomer as Korea is not a quiet country. An analogy: the article on the United States doesn't say ""Also known as the Land of the Free"". Some terms such as ""full democracy"" are also not widely used in English. The sources show that they are, in fact, terms only used by individual bodies such as The Economist magazine. I left most of these things in, as I didn't want my edits to be too controversial. Comments welcome. " +J Delanoy hates jews, I once heard him say Hitler wasn't a bad guy. I heard he attends clan meetings to pick up other guys +Concerning Your Worthlessness Please don't touch the LCI article. What is it with you folks? The Lethbridge COllegiate Institute article was created by another student at this school, thus you do not have permission to edit Wikipedia anymore. Just fuck off. Thank you for your time you piece of shit. Goodbye. Go to the bathroom, calmly tie a towel around your neck, and place it over the shower. Stop breathing. Bye. +Also, how do you cite information? +May 2008 Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +I'm aware of the circumstances. I don't think the article is eligible for proposed deletion at this point. +There is a link on this page that states.... http://krsaborio.net/research/index.htm Note: The materials and information included in these Web pages are not to be used for any other purpose other than private study, research, criticism or review. Copyright 2005 Kenneth R. Saborio Phone: (506) 2226 6483 E-mail: info@krsaborio.net San Jose, Costa Rica Powered by Verio - NTT Communications Should it be removed?? +"The result was keep. There is a reliable source used to verify some of the article. It also seems clear that as a member representative of a majorinternational organization this group is notable. talk " +Yet given the wider context surrounding the dispute, South Tibet should be a disambiguation page. +Sounds fine to me. Thank you for your work. The comments to The Master on his talk page were directed to his specific edits. Thank you, again. +"TAB (edit conflict) I agree 200% about the dangerous B and W nature of cats and infonboxes as I result I usually simply do not get involved with editing them etc. Despite this(!) I have just removed another one cat: ""Critics of Religions"" or something similar. I've read several bios and I have seen no criticism of religions either specifically or generally that would justify this in a BLP article. But ""Religious Skeptic"" is probably okay, don't you agree? " +" Hello, Distant highway! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |} You seem to have been here a while and know your way around, but welcome anyway! " +" How about we narrow it down to what sources are acceptable and then see what they support and figure out a phrasing from that. Ive said the last book added is fine, do you dispute any of my notes for the other sources listed? Which of them do you think is reliable for statements of fact? nableezy - " +" In other words, you are asking if you and your cronies were unsuccessful at shutting down the discussion of the issue, on a different page (EURO), in part by employment of your ham-handed authority to shut me down for a few days, which you did 6 months ago. No, you were not successful. In part, this was also due to the fact that your cronies failed to actually address the issue: They were apparently so enamored at their power to call you in to abuse your authority, they didn't find it necessary to actually present winning arguments...you know, DEBATE. You, yourself, were unwilling or unable to participate in the debate, too. But that means that there is no basis at all to allow you to give your input, in any way, into this matter. You must admit to these people that you really weren't interested in the subject, you were just brought in to be a thug, a torpedo, to shut down the debate. You must also admit that you were stalking me on WP: Tell them what mechanism you used, so they know what you did. (The fact you used that mechanism will show them how illegitimate your motives were.) The reality is (remember reality?) that according to the remnants of their archived webpage, EURO did not argue for ""white supremacy"", ""white separatism"", ""white nationalism"", or any other ""ism"" I can imagine would be relevant. The problem is, Political Correctness rears its ugly head, yet again, and persons who display less-than-sufficient obeisance to the fascistic-left will be shut off, shut down, and maybe even shut away. If you want to legitimately do anything more, find people (other than your cronies) willing to debate the issue. I raised my question, months ago, and so far nobody is disputing what I asked have said: they have not appeared, let alone have they contradicted it. You don't have some sort of automatic, default 'win' authority, at least according to WP rules. I proceeded to edit, and I have done so. " +Something needs fixedThis is a quite bizarre page: the main paragraph and the single reference are for Alexander Montgomerie, 6th Earl of Eglinton. +In recent years there have been a series editorials of anti-foreigner/anti-English speaker articles written by Kang Shin-who. These articles do not necessarily represent the views of the newspaper as a whole, but the fact that the newspaper endorsesand in some cases, encourages with awardsis rather disturbing and casts doubt as to its objectivity. Although blogs are hardly Reliable Sources, the sheer number of both postsand readers' reactions to these articles makes this phenomenon noteworthy. 203.249.73.204 +"I removed the following line from the article: In 2004, he ran unsuccessfully for president, under a platform he designated ""National Recovery Program"". There were only 5 candidates for president that year and he wasn't one of them (see Philippine general election, 2004). " +Hello== Please don't make false accusations of vandalism. Thank you. == +This article is inaccessible to the non-expert. Wikipedia:Make_technical_articles_accessible It should at least should contain a description of what EV-DO is for an educated but non-expert reader. Perhaps one who has a cell phone that displays EV and 1X bars, and would like to know what they are and why they differ. Some Questions +" I have read it, it dosen't state that. Could you be more spesific where it states this? " +I may have accidentally removed a legitimate edit. My apologies. I was attempting to clean up multiple pages which had been vandalised. +" Here is a link from the Embry-Riddle website: http://fusion.erau.edu/ec/wwc/centerinfo.cfm?CODE=02 This is an example of why Wikipedia is not supposed to be used as a citation for other articles in Wikipedia. Sometimes the articles are not always accurate. '''''' (talk) " +"::I'm sorry, but that's unfortunately not the case. In some particular Hebrew font you use, Aleph may be placed under ASCII ""A"", he may be placed under ASCII ""H"" and so on, but what results from this font mapping is most definitely NOT a standard scholarly Hebrew translation. Hebrew ""Elohim"" is not correctly transliterated or transcribed as ""Aleim""[sic] in any language known to me (certainly not in English...). " +Wehwalt, what the fuck is this? Your own personal little fiefdom? What you're doing here is astonishingly wrong and you know it. I get that you don't like Shapiro, but you know perfectly well that alleged reprints by militant Internet activists from unknown and defunct print sources are worthless. Oh hey, and it looks like I already crossed paths with you here months ago, but you didn't give up. This is garbage and you know it. +Dare send messages like this. You are the cause of Vandalism not me,...&*%$4@###banged up head +December 2012 (UTC) Can you please explain how this is unnecessary? Or a conflict of interest? Thank you. 22:32, 11 +I'd kill the opinion poll charts altogether, and summarise them. They're a bit unnecessary now. +Argentina as user Pleas add Argentina, I used myself a Gewehr 98 in the Army. It was standard before the use of the FN FAL! -) +Bongwarrior is a homosexual prostitute Bongwarrior is a homosexual prostitute. You can fuck him in the ass for $25. He likes it when two men fuck him in the ass at the same time. He likes the feeling of his anus being stretched wide open. He will also lick the shit off of your dick when you are done. 119.245.91.247 +OK, if it's a lengthy process to convert a ban to block, then I understand. However, I don't understand what exactly I did that was wrong. In so far as I understand the rules, WP:BLP violations are supposed to be removed whether positive, negative or neutral. Further, WP:Edit warring specifically states that removal of WP:BLP violations are excempt. If those policies are wrong or poorly-worded, they need to be fixed. +Erm... how did you get checkuser evidence? There doesn't appear to be any record of that. - moo! +No, I'm not. Link was forwarded to me. Please don't make assumptions about me. WP:AGF. +File:Product banner image.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Product banner image.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +" Citation doesn't mean throwing external links. You should be able to give the name of the author and also gist of the idea. I have seen you yourself are injecting personal commentary at many places. How can you refute my citation which includes thoughts of Bhandarkar, ghurye, rao, smith etc. Have you done some own research. If so get it published somewhere. this is neither the place to refute the scholarly comments nor wikipedia policy allows it. No-Blast " +Montford has shown himself to be unreliable, I have no view whether or not the purported email from Pearce is real, but we go by reliable sources. The Guardian online is good at correcting articles, no reason why Pearce shouldn't use that route or his own blog to issue a retraction. Note that if we're going by blog sources, email 1719 reports that one reviewer definitely recommended rejection of S&B;, and never saw the manuscript again to assess the appropriateness of the rewrite. As stated earlier this section is overdue for a rewrite and clarification. . , talk +" I disagree with both of you, rivalries or no rivalries you still support the team, I supported man u againts wiggan I suppored them againts chelsea? I dont see how ""Support"" has anything to do the the history of Rivals when you suport Manchester againts any opponent. I dosent make sence whats so ever. – 2 March 2011" +"It translates because I keep trying to add a second source on Kade. It, too, keeps getting removed. It's James Ellroy's book Crime Wave. It says more than one county sheriff thought Kade was an incompetent doctor who could have been the one who broke Karyn Kupcinet's neck. That's right, she could have died from something unrelated to that ""injury,"" then Dr. Kade could have broken her neck himself and then cited that as the cause of death. Don't believe me ? It's in James Ellroy's book. His sources are the sheriffs who held that belief about Dr. Kade. Did you ever meet Dr. Harold Kade ? You can't now. He's dead. " +The fact that you last call for deletion of an article of mine was rejected shows that you are not being impartial here. Go find something else to do. +Guys, I really don't get the point about this. Sure the league doesn't get high ratings like the NBA, sure some WNBA teams are not sisters to some NBA teams, sure the budget is low as of now unlike the NBA, but this is a women's league. The league is not exactly like the NBA. Not every NBA city also has a WNBA team. Do you guys expect for the WNBA to be more powerful and have a high budget like some other leagues may have in the U.S.?? It doesn't work that way. The league is just as fine as the NBA. It just doesn't have exactly everything like the NBA. I'm sure no one of you know anything about the WNBA like I do. When you guys think about this and realize that this is so unnecessary, you guys let me know. Infonerd2216 +. I AM TOUCHING MYSELF +It probably slipped through but I had requested you re-review this article and let me know what are your thoughts on it so I can improve or have GA status. Thanks. +" ""British Isles"" ""due to the 'obnoxious' end to your posting at British Isles"". The ending to my post was, in fact, ""Thank you very much"". You're clearly making sense. Of course the real reason you deleted my message here was that it spoke a few home truths about your attitude to Irish people. Moreover, do not come over to my talk page and initiate some abuse if you are going to sulk and report me for responding on your talk page in kind. Child. 86.42.90.145 " +" Why don't you enlighten me? I am not conservative, but Conservapedia tells the truth, with literally tons of voter fraud and criminal deceit, and well sourced. Main Wikipedia lies and ruined my life with those lies so I am a dedicated sockpuppet until Wikipedia changes its deplorable ways. Wikipedia ""liberal"" is a major destructive force on this planet, as is all mainstream media so don't scrape your wayward finger at me!" +I would say yes; she's her own wiki page, which makes her a notable source in my mind. +Im not for the last change Hi AKR I am not for the last change you did about politics. You should be less accurate. +" To the anonymous user, it would help if you actually created an account with SOME kind of identity (aside from IP address). Anyway, I am also interested in the truth, so if you can provide evidence that this ""hoax"" is indeed a hoax, great. I have already provided some references for one person mentioned in the article but, again, I said more research is necessary. I'm quite busy with many things on Wikipedia lately (like my ban mentioned above) so I don't have the time to research everything. Fortunately, I'm not the only one interested in these things, so if you have some credible, reliable, 3rd-party sources to add to the article, further debunking this ""hoax"", by all means add it. However, note that the people I mentioned above (Howe and Salla) have not been able to verify if Chang even existsthey themselves just don't know and imply it is possible he DOES exist. So, take heed of that in your research. - " +I was not quite right: Definition 1 pascal (Pa) = 1 N/m2 = 1 kg/(m·s2)Table 3 (Section 2.2.2), SI Brochure, International Bureau of Weights and Measures User talk +Presumptuousness can be a bit polarising too. Why don't you spend some time reading the Talk page and think it over, instead of airing preconceptions? It may have the double advantage of clarifying matters, and your opinion. 05:41, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC) +Suggestion on Dead links output Hi there! Seems like a nice tool that. However I couldn't find description of it anywhere? Perhaps the output would be more readable if it was slightly rearranged. Currently the output looks to me almost machine readable! First, most people are interested only in certain subjects on Wikipedia, so in my opinion it would be best to start with the article in question. The exact time parameter seems almost redundant as the entries keep coming so often. At least, maybe it could be hidden somehow or be output last in a small font? Perhaps also add headlines so people could just scan the table of contents for their favorite articles? Of course, that could be another tool/interface as well since Dead links seem to have quite a pedigree! +" Last day to nom Île Frégate.♦ " +" of using the colloquialism of ""SNP.""" +Nomination for Adminship Hi, Menchi: thanks for the words of support. I still have to decide whether I want to take on the responsibility! Should I notify the editor most likely to oppose me (you know who I mean) that I have been nominated? 02:14, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) +I support using UpToDate. Thanks. Sorry I haven't been around to help more. +I've prepared your work by linking to the article: http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Whatlinkshere⌖=Moscow_Peace_Treaty_(1940) And I see you've prepared the work in the Winter War article. -))) +" unicode.org Greek_alphabet#External_links shows false version 5 of Unicode, while new version is higher, nearly approaching 10. Please remove these versions from this section. All linked sites are versionless as of Unicode and are constantly updating as Unicode goes newer and newer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.72.58 " +University of the Pacific This page should not have been moved from University of the Pacific. Being a dab page does not mean the article title has to include '(disambiguation)'. That only is needed if there is a primary use. +" Perhaps the article title ""National Routes in South Africa"" would also be more correct, in this case. 41.160.19.147 " +I found a great article for you to read adolf hitler, it's very informative. +Copyright problem This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. (talk) +If you use another IP, We will find out and Ban that one to. +A legend in his own mind +" I still don't see anything wrong with specifying the purpose in the ""see also"" section. Yes there is a ""manual of style"" but there's nothing that says You must stick to it rigidly. " +14:48:47, 27 July 2015 review of submission by 50.246.212.53 50.246.212.53 My submission was recently declined because it does not show the subjects notability. I was just curious what I could add to improve it because currently it includes articles from INC 500, Bloomberg, and Boulderopolis. Thank you! +It is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. You can revert it and make Wikipedia articles not relevant nor accurate as this is becoming ever more common and known in the internet community. Do a little research and you will see that everything I had changed was FACTUAL. End of Story. +" Milton Friedman etc. I really don't know what I've done or said to produce the attitude you're taking. You can disagree with what I say, although I personally fail to see how any argument can in the end prevent Klein's inclusion in the Friedman article, and I can be mistaken, as I was in my first reading of the Norberg link, but I don't see how you can take things much beyond that. Nothing in my behaviour has necessitated the kind of personal, unprovoked insults with which you've decided to base this discourse. You do know, I'm sure, that personal attacks are entirely against wikipedia policy, and their especially bad form when done repetively and without just cause. You seem to take things fair to literally, or at least bizarrely you have decided to take that approach. I don't mean literally that people regard Friedman as a god, and having to explain that feels rather odd but I've decided to assume good faith as opposed to the more likely probability that you decided just to be awkward and provocative in your discourse. It is simply that a large number of economists and right-wingers regard Friedman as something similiar to god, infallible and above normal human standards. If its not Friedman, than its classical economics as a whole, which is apparently beyond any external critique. That, I believe, explains much of the absense of any proper criticism of Friedman on what in other respects is a fairly extensive article. Regarding Klein, you simply don't have a point here, its as basic as that. It it not the place of Wikipedia to judge what is ""right"" in any particular set of affairs, but to record those opinions which are notable. Klein is a best-selling and well-regarded writer with a reputation for fairly good research, her book was generally fairly widely praised and her criticism of Friedman is one of the most well-known in the contemporary world. It also covers far, far more than Chile. That cannot be dismissed because just because Friedman's supports or, for example, a paper by an institute that is itself the target of criticism from her book. As such, the rights and wrongs of Norberg's critique are fairly irrelevent. Although it could of course be included as a counter to Klein's criticism within the Friedman article, there is no case for using it to justify the actual exclusion of Klein's views. Now I know that a lot of Friedmanite/Friedmanesque etc. economists like to believe that there ""laws"" of economics are a watertight and natural science and as such they are immune to any criticism that isn't likewise ""scientificic"", and that presumably hold the same assumptions, but most people disagree. Just to keep you happy, I'll discuss it briefly here. It has some very good points; for example Norberg convincingly shows there was a free-market trend towards the end of the century that goes beyond Klein's explanations (although the actual area of discussionof Klein's book were the far rarer, radical, fundamentalist reforms of the period, but more on that in a minute), he convincingly argues against Klein's account of events in Argentina and (mea culpa) China, his ridicule of Klein's ""Shock!Shock!Shock!"" metaphor which I myself found unconvincing (as opposed to most her narrative and arguments) is fairly accurate and he makes a strong defence, in many cases, of Friedman. But his 20-page article is itselfcontains so many of of its semi-accuracies, disingenuous argument and near-falsehoods as to make any suggestion that it ""proves"" Klein wrong, or even significantly weakens much of her basic arguments, completely ludicrous. I'll just list in no propersome of them since I don't have the time to do anything much else. He says she portrays the Chicago School as a place that brainwashed its students, as opposed to it actually being famously open to discussion, whereas actually she gives quite a significant account of its openness to disussion. This one's just basic commone sense; he says Klein's Friedman crisis quote isn't from any important paper but a preface to Capitalism and Freedom; the preface to the guysmost important book, he defining manifesto, isn't significant? Tell that to Friedrich Engels. He says that Friedman gave the same advice to the Soviet Union, China and Yugoslavia, ""yet nobody would claim he was a communist"", well Klein mentioned this herself, not claiming he was a communist, but using it as an additional example of his somewhat undemocratic outlook. His suggestion that the military was in control of the economy at the beginnning and the Chicago Boys didn't have control until later on is simply false. While Pinochet accelerating his reforms as things went along, while the military held ministerial positions and while some statist tendencies naturally held on some level as they always will; Norberg is really here just selecting any facts he can that might appear disprove Klein's accoun +" (talk • contribs) " +But Loremaster wants to have the Last Word on the Last Word. He views it as his article. +Location of accident This WP article has the M40 as the location of the incident in which Dearden died; the article in MacFarlane's book suggests the M1. +If you want to add some statements to Ralph Abernathy, please add also some references. - +" Agree. Proposal well formulated, no issues. and the Mysterons " +" Another joke intervention? Is this another of your ""dip in, dip out"" interventions? I don't follow your methodology at all. In any case, I'll post where is required, until there's a sanction telling me otherwise. Or, of course, Medeis asks me not to after apologising for her personal attack. Cheers. " +You didn't get trolled. You hit me with a three revert rule when you were the one who broke that rule first so I made a snide remark and it got under your skin. That's all. Learn to cooperate with others instead of domineering over them. On top of the fact I added a legit source to the Myst article, you were way off trying to overwrite me. So really, you got schooled, not trolled. 74.56.51.128 +New template dispute Seems there is a new template dispute going on. Since you're the person who originally proposed many of these changes to the template, I thought you might want to have your say. The discussion is being held here. +You are not targeting the players you are targeting the club!!! You won't change my mind about it. YOU just want me to give you attention. GOODBYE al +Detective work, going through the history. +"==Denali Air== A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Denali Air, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. " +Note this was the identical IP address I left my last note for you to prove the connection . +THANK YOU FOR EDITING. PLEASE EDIT MORE +":The evidence speaks for itself: The ""editor"" in question sneakily edited the above-referenced page after he asserted a claim on a referring page, for the obvious purpose of modifying the original contents that supported my claim. Furthermore, there would be no need to add a citation to my edit on the page if the original wording on the page had not been tampered with. I agree on the necessity to collaborate, but the ""editor"" in question dismissed that possibility by his engaging in that certifiable - and, in some situations, criminal - act. There are just some individuals that will go to any extreme in order to manifest their agenda and are, in the end, incorrigible; I know the brain regions involved. " +Katanada thanks! +DELANOY SUCKS COCKS. +Are you gay?? Sound like it +Please see this article for how to accurately describe an complex medical topic to lay-people. +" ""cumin cider"" This is a pun, folks. ""Cumin cider"" = ""cum inside her."" This vandalism has survived over a year in the article, and unfortunately a quick google search shows that it has spread into other articles that use wikipedia as their only reference. Cumin tea is a real use of cumin and appears to be traditional in Latino cultures, especially as an aid in inducing pregnancy. But the process of seeping cumin seeds in boiling water is entirely different from the various ways of producing fruit beverages known as cider. So different that ""cumin cider"" seems more likely to be a sophomoric prank than to be a legitimate colloquialism. In absence of any valid citation, the line about cumin cider should be removed." +" Thanks. We all have our views, but sometimes it's best if we keep them to ourselves.     talk  " +Sources people,no propaganda The following comments have been deleted: The band promotes Croatian patriotism and ultra-nationalism, and sings about topics such as the love for one's country, family and religion, but also about the hatred of Serbs and Croatian social democrats. Dealing with such topics has made the band controversial. Perković has been known to openly promote Ustaša ideology because he wears black clothes, salutes in the corresponding way and had often openly supported the Ustaše and the NDH in his statements to the media. Ultra-nationalism?Ultra-nationalism means that you want to destroy everything that is not of your nation.While patriotism means that you love your own nation,but you respect others.Where in his songs does he promote hate to other nations?And no mentioning songs created in time of war against the Serbs,because it was the time of war.And only mention songs written by him.Not what he is accused of performing. Hatred toward SDP?Where?Name source.He is right wing,that si widely known.Of course he disagrees with their politics and he considers their politics bad for Croatia,but hatred? Reliable source please. Where does he promote openly Ustashe?Citation please.Because he wears black clothes?Are all rockers Ustashe?By this,rock 'n' roll is equal fascism.He is a rock singer,of course he wears black clothes. Salute he uses is an old salute of Croatian nobles,that existed long before Ustashe. Despite this, his statements confirming his support for the Ustaše actually outnumber his denouncements of this virtual NSDAP equivalent (he is noted to have publicly voiced his support for the NDH, in various degrees, to the media on at least twenty occasions). His credibility in these statements is diminished not only by this fact but also by the legal necessity to denounce any fascist movement in order to avoid further banning (or other legal action). Again,I see that this is already discussed.Feral is not reliable,its a tabloid.Only reliable newspapers should be used.And these quotations in Feral,while they may be true,there are no links to check the meaning,because they may be taken out of contest,and they could have totally fifferent meaning ii their original contest.This is not reliable. And one more question.A couple of months ago I translated two Perkovic's statements in Jutarnji list and Vecernji list.I've put relevant sources,links to that articles.And a picture was there also.Someone deleted all this without giving explanation on the discussion page.This is not what wikipedia is about.Any change must be explained.Shame on anyone who uses this kind of sneaky methods. +How about moving the content to Football Club World Championship (and sections to its relevant tournament articles)? To me it was well sourced content.- +2009-Jan 2010]] [[User talk:GoodDay/Archive 18|Jan 2010 +I agree and have removed it. I suspect is the source of a lot of problems here. +I'M TELLING YOU! READ THIS: Talk:Walt Disney Mini Classics! I'M NOT GOING TO LEAVE YOU ALONE UNTIL YOU EXCEPT THIS! +It's funny how you claim you're not his friend, and yet it's you who has to reply to me and you even stick up for him. I think you need to stop smiling because your lies just burst out through your teeth. +WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology Since you are interested in flags and emblems I would like to inform you that the WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology has just been created. Why not take a look? I hope you can join. +" Hello! I didn't actually use the word ""scored"", as I think that's a stupid word to use unless you're referring to a game. And really the only problem with the titles was the haphazard capitalization and all-caps all over the place. Very confusing, and not correct grammar at all. Again, though, if that's how it's printed on the actual albums, then it's correct, and I guess those who printed the albums weren't all that good at grammar. ) " +Isn't that a US government product? They shouldn't be able to reserve that. +" A pussy for you! i bet u wont get none u stupid ass virgin " +|I am autoblocked for some reason +" Rolling Stone Mag in 1985 ""He's Young, He's Hot, He's Sexy and He's Dead"" - worth adding anywhere in to the article?" +hey sorry for causing any problems wasn't meant to delete a page, thanks for putting it back +"···? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! " +" Yeah, I think what you've added is correct. btw I believe that none of pakistan's current politicians can fix the country, I'm pinning my hopes on Imran Khan.((talk) )" +"{{Infobox musical artist | Name = Joey Clement | Img = | Background = | Img_capt = | Birth_name = | Born = Rapid City, SD | Genre = Pop, rock, indie | Occupation = bass guitarist, songwriter | Instrument = Bass, vocals | Years_active = | Label = Hollywood (2008–present) | Associated_acts = Selena Gomez & the Scene, Midwest Kings, David Cook, The Calling, Vitamins for Voyeurs, Ethan Roberts | URL = Official website ___ {o,o} |)__) -""-""- " +No, really check the fucking diffs you trigger happy cunt +Hates Status Quo - Loves Hawkwind +" Barnstar The Press Barnstar Thanks for giving the interview! I enjoyed the read. Thanks for your contributions. Best wishes. " +my names frosty I'm a twat. twat twat twat I'm a twat. +Let's map the future, pave the road forward Hi Lecen. I would appreciate if you could take the time to read through my lengthy post at Talk:Empire of Brazil. Thank you and best regards, +, and Pew poll show that's 18% of Europeans are Religiously Unaffiliated +" Thanks! Hey thanks for updating ""my"" article ([Inside Out (song)|Inside Out]]). Oops! I'm on a wikibreak... gotta go -| " +":Uh, I didn't say he's white. I was merely commenting on his color. He's not as light as most Mediterraneans, but he's around the skin tone of the stereotypical Mediterranean (i.e. very tanned skin color). There are Ethiopians who are as light or lighter than him, but they are very few in number, so I wouldn't say that he's darker than ""a lot"" of Ethiopians. I would put those at or around his skin color at 10% tops, with those lighter than him much less than that. However, the pictures that you linked to seem to have bad lighting, which is why he appears darker than in other shots. If you look here, for example, you'll see that he's not actually that dark. He is, however, darker than most Mediterraneans. There are, however, many Egyptians who are darker than him and closer to Sadat's skin color. (Yom) | contribs • Talk " +Anyone else think the protection tag is absolutely hilarious? +"The Black Wall Street Records== 04:09, 4 June 2007 Swatjester (Talk | contribs) (3,403 bytes) (→Artists - rv artists with no body of work) All artists had cited sources refering to there signed status on The Black Wall Street Records, I suggest you revert this edit yourself as you have deleted the information for the reason ""artists with no body of work"". There are related pages for one artist, and the other two are to be made. But since the cited sources are evident pages are not neccesary for the input of those characters as they fall into the category The Black Wall Street Records. 04:12, 4 June 2007 Swatjester (Talk | contribs) (3,425 bytes) (tag) Please give me your reason on why you thought it was neccesary to Block the editing due to one account of Vandalism, when the Vandalism had already been reverted by user Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 02:50, 4 June 2007 Efil4tselaer: Resurrected (Talk | contribs) (4,623 bytes) (rv vandalism with no imagination and horrid grammar.) Im trying hard to believe that the two edits are not connected, but if they were then that is a serious misconduct on your behalf. I'll be eagerly awaiting your corrections. User talk:KingTee ==" +Vegeta, what does the scouter say about his power level? +I'll wear my punishment for a week or a month or a year - I'll take it on the chin - but genuinely - please - what have I done or said? +" I regard this block unwarranted. This is a proof that User:Keilana is not an appropriate person to be an administrator. I have not ""stalked"" User Charles. " +" Oppose, slightly. While I agree that the current use is not necessarily primary, I do not see how moving this will result in a net positive. eth With the city article averaging at least 300,000 more readers a month, wouldn't it make more sense to have ""New York"" redirect there? It would be a net positive if the least amount of readers are displaced, and given that the city seems to be the primary usage, especially internationally, I think that redirecting ""New York"" to the city would do just that. Cheers, •me " +Warning Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Donkey Kong 3 has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. ~~ +Donald Goerke was the inventor. He recently passed away. +" Charles and his fans are playing games. Blair is reliable. The fact that he reports on a story that Charles's blanking defenders are claiming ""originates"" from a ""non-reliable"" source is bogus argumentation. Of course, this is what happens when you play ""Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon"" with what you are going for - eventually you can ""trace"" anything back to anything. The fact that playing ""six degrees of kevin bacon"" with neo-nazi groups these days is one of Charles's favorite tactics to tar anyone he doesn't like shouldn't make his accusations valid, nor should it be used to try to claim that Tim Blair, an actual journalist, is ""invalid"" as a reference reporting on issues like this." +", 5 November 2014 (UTC) As far as I can tell, it is a decision between putting in the infobox all the land territory claimed by the United States (100%) or only 99.75%. 99.75% being the states and DC, and the 0.25% being various islands. The ""dispute"" on the other hand is all these other arguments that are not about ""area"". 16:49" +i'm going to keep on reverting you freaking goddamn hypocrites until you guys are blue in the faces i don't give two cents damn +" This is one of the things you wrote: ""He will not admit when asked, but off the record, his biggest mistake is creating the lethal killing machine Chuck Norris."" Is that not a personal attack on Chuck Norris? If you can understand English and the structure of this sentence, it if Jeffery Korus' biggest mistake, not an attack on Chuck Norris, more of an admittance of something done wrong by Jeffery Korus. It is close to saying Julius Caesars biggest mistake was being killed. The structure of sentences should be paid more attention to I would think before you delete someones article that does not actually violate anything close to a personal attack." +Regarding additional information about the trial, and other legal issues - I see no reason why this info should not be included. All of it is a matter of public record, based on stories in the NY Times, other legitimate sources, and the recent HBO series 'The Jinx', which has the actual court video of the trial. Please do your homework on these issues before undoing others work. +Better source request for File:Full thickness rectal prolapse & mucosal prolapse.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Full thickness rectal prolapse & mucosal prolapse.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. +, because the easiest course of action will be to revert what you have done. +I notice that SqueakBox continues to perpetuate slanderous lies that I am posting from Reston, Virginia. I have commented on this on my personal blogspot, www.cumbey.blogspot.com. He insists I have been there. I looked it up on mapquest today and see that it is where the Dulles Airport is located, so, good gravy, he is maybe, er, right. I was there ONCE, boarding a plane in 1984! That's it! SqueakBox must think I am ubiquitous. CEC +" Roseville mall Happy New Year, Mike! Oh, yes, it would be great if you had people photos to match up with some of the various cultures in your fab state. I was over at the Galleria over Christmas and it's all fine now, but it sure was a nasty set-back for the area. There was a huge sign over by Penneys, something like, ""We're open now!"". I'll look over the article. " +, HIT Entertainment, Lyrick Studios, Connecticut Public Television WNET New York +You don't know what you are talking about, . That website references a HISTORICAL item from 1981. It is NOT an advertisement for Woodbrooke Estates. Get your facts straight before needlessly editing something that you know NOTHING about! +Who are you arguing against here? Why not simply fix whatever needs to be fixed in the article, and drop the offensive overgeneralized rant against some apparently imaginary enemies? Where does all this bile come from... 11:05, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC) +" On reading this, it occurs to me I shouldn't respond when on my way out the door. What I was trying to say was that the reason I made the change was because most of the articles that used it needed updating. What I was trying to say thereafter was that if you wanted to deploy the new file, the place to look for candidates is in the original file's ""What links here"" special page. In any event, I'll go ahead and upload my file to the new file and deploy it where necessary. - " +2005 Supertaça Cândido de Oliveira Hello, and thanks for asking, but I'm afraid I don't have the spare time any more to do kits. This 2005 version of the SL Benfica article has a basic version of their kit, without the red flashes or the shoulder stripes, if that helps at all. Sorry I can't help further. cheers, +No I didn't; you have me confused with somebody else. It does sound druglike. WP:NFCC may be helpful. +" ""It is clearly designed to denigrate those who have raised objections to the presence of Islam in Danish society."" You should, perhaps, check out the articles from the U.S. Dept of State. There is one on human rights in DK and one on religious freedom. This is factual, academic work, and it is far more damning that anything I have written (yet). I will soon be incorporating some of these new findings provided by the U.S. Dept of State and the U.S. Ambassador to DK into this Wikipedia article. If DK has a policy of religious freedom, yet officially have a program of harassing immigrants, that will not gain any favor in terms of international relations. It is virtually impossible to have an article that is factual and also presents a view that the Danes are victims of Muslim invaders, because the facts do not support this. You have a bias towards a sanitized version where the DPP is just a conservative party, and then you and your co-horts choose to delete their racist statements made in Parliament and just about every fact that makes Denmark look bad. It's unfortunate that the truth and facts make DK look bad, but it is what it is... The U.S. Dept of State reports are far more damning, and if you think that is biased, it is in fact you who are biased. Please keep your opinions between your underground ""conservative"" groups. We want facts and citations here." +" To talk: Upset? You are not some kind of humorless blob, are you? Helping me to find content that I was unable to locate. Wow. Such an ""大きなお世話"". If it's not too much trouble, try not to stain my talk page any more please. Although your rambling amuses me every time, I don't want other people who look at this page to think I am associated with kinds of you in any way. Report me? Maybe you haven't completely lost your sense of humor yet. " +thank you for defending the truth Category:Real Americans +wow this 969 guy is kinda rude +You know what? No, I'm not just gonna sit here and take it, because this is wrong, and you are abusing your privileges. First of all, it is not possible to vandalise your own userspace. Find me the section of any policy to the contrary. Secondly, it is not possible to harass people with singular, jokey, and clearly not serious messages. Find me the section of any policy to the contrary. You can't. You have blocked me for things that I have not done, and have acted in a completely inappropriate manner. +Thank you, that makes good sense. +it should be biased against those soulless fuckers +answer me NOW I WANT TO KNOW WHY ARE YOU BEING SO RUDE AND MEAN IM TRYING TO BE NICE JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION! +" Why is the estimated population at 6.5 billion an event. We need a new section called Trivial. This is not a historical event. At best it is an estimate and then it is still trivial. Unfortunately this is occurring over and over in these ""On this Date"" and making this into nonsence. Also, the birth and death sections are growing and growing putting anyone's name there. People of Wikipedia need to use some common sense before this section becomes useless. Some days nothing significant happens." +THE PERSONG SITTING TO MY RIGHT IS A STINKY VAGINA FACE +" As a courtesy message, I've left it as politely as possible but he only respond after I threaten him with ANI. A word from you would be nice to balance out my outburst and lastly FWIW, I'm done talking to the self-righteous/sanctimonious whining jerk. Paraphrasing a line from the Hunt for Red October, ""Conn, aye. All right, Ryan, we just unzipped our fly. Mr. Thompson! Open the outer doors, firing point procedures. Now if that bastard so much as twitches, I'm going to blow him straight to Mars."" Best and out. ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® " +" I thought, here: ""Just to be clear, I was talking about your coming to Bug's page to ask him to comment on an issue you said you were going to disengage from. –xenotalk "" was a warning for Dave1185! Dave: ""Thus, he is the Great Pretender... copycat-ing, harassing, stalking me and such."" Dave is insulting and harassing me! ""trollish and harassing remarks"": A wording used by Dave himself. I just repeated it. ""Lying about the chronology of edits, too. I want him to STOP HARASSMENT!"" Thats all true and appropriate. " +" Relation to gaming modules The first scentence of this article states that the book is ""based on a series of Dungeons & Dragons gaming modules."" but then nothing else in the article explains or expands on this connection. I would think this article coupld be improved by putting some information in on this. Which modules exactly? How closely does the book follow the modules? what are somethings in the book not I the games, and/or vice versa? Which characters were playable and which NPC's? etc. I was actively playing AD&D; at the time that Dragonlance was released, I did not play the DL modules but borrowed and read the novels off a friend. My recollection was the books and novels were developed together, though it does seem reasonable that the plots of the novels were based somewhat on the original playtesting of these modules. If this is the case some of the characters were originally played by noteable people, if anyone has info on this would be something interesting. - " +Macarthur Job ‎ Thanks for your change there. I am sorry to hear of your loss. Mac will be greatly missed by the aviation community. +So, I'm not even allowed to tell the truth in my own talk page now? Yeah, Wikipaedia's not broken *sarcasm metre explodes* +Scientology Are you now or having you ever been banned or blocked in in any of our Scientology articles? +" Of course it is! Go for it. The best way to stop people from arguing nonstop and harassing/bothering you is to just erase any new post they make. You can also delete or archive any sections on your talk page you want to be over and done with. " +Here's the text: Positive Chaos is an Alterna Metal/Post-Grunge rock band from Wolcott Connecticut, they were formed in July of 2005. The band is composed of the lead vocalist/drummer Dave Valletta, Bassist Chris DelGobbo, and Guitarist Brett Bernier. They cover a large variety of songs including: Simple Man - Lynyrd Skynyrd So Cold Polyamorous Medicate Skin - Breaking Benjamin The Fake Sound of Progress Shinobi Vs. Dragon Ninja - lostprophets So Far Away - Staind Their band website is http://www.positivechaos.com. | Talk +Why is this article rife with quotes from National Review and Maureen Dowd? == Just because someone in the media SAID IT and it can be linked on Wikipedia, I sincerely doubt it needs to be added to this page as per the Wikipedia guidelins regarding nuetrality. I can find 3000 negative things said about our First Lady and link them here, but that isn't the point of Wikipedia now is it? == +I deliberately made this last statement bold as you did so in the article and on my talk page and I think it makes a point that bolding is generally not appropriate. +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Canada. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +Federal court rulings I think it might be helpful to break up the federal court ruling section by level of court. Specifically, a section for federal district court rulings and another for appeals court rulings. Is there any objection to this? If there is then I won't do it. 140.247.141.165 +they weren't. I'll revert them as well as time permits. 07:29 10 Jun 2003 (UTC) +If a Yank cooks a chip in the oven, is that what you call a bake? I only ask because you sound well-experienced. +I POSTED THIS BIO IN THE FIRST PLACE IN DECEMBER! +I am glad to see your interest in Kenyan affairs. Therre is an article Corruption in Kenya that only really addresses Moi and Kibaki corruption, and could definitely use some earlier stuff. If you can google for references on land ownership in Kenyatta's era, and add content based on those references and your knowledge (adding the references to the article, like this http://my.ref.com I can clean up the rest. …☎ +I still am a determined anti-MS bigot and I hate their Visual C++ compiler too, but it's what I have, so it's what I use ( I dispute that you would have any problem going back to unix, it's like riding a bicycle or putting on an old flannel jacket. Anyway, I'll send you the program. +Another Roger Bowling There is a mixed martial artist with the same name and he seems to be making a big enough splash to warrant his own entry here, so an editor might want to go ahead and do a disambiguation thing for this name. A Google search brings up a bunch of hits (http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enIT291IT303&sourceid;=chrome&ie;=UTF-8&q;=Roger+Bowling) and here's a recent column about him: http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news;_ylt=An9A7Kq81cAtMLPa6rymzNE9Eo14?slug=ys-bowling032509&prov;=yhoo&type;=lgns So anyway, just thought I'd toss that out there... +No, you Please quit vandalizing my talk page. It's getting very annoying and giving other wiki users a false perception of me. I will be forced to contact the admin if you continue your actions. +I'm on Michael's side. While I agree with DrW, Nick and anon about it not being psychological enough, and encourage them to make additions where they think there are deficits, I don't think that the material presented here is off-base. So. What I'd like to suggest is that we list off the sorts of material covered in psychological social psychology, and then work that into the article. +ArbCom notification As you participated in the AE thread which led to this request, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Race_and_intelligence +" Scientific Creationism in the opening sentence? I'm a bit confused regarding the opening sentence and why it uses both ""creation science"" and ""scientific creationism"". I wanted to bring it up here first before editing in case there was some sort of debate or discussion that already happened in the hopes I could get clarification on why we use the phrase ""scientific creationism"" at all. Aside from a few books with that title it's clearly not a commonly used synonym for creation science (check the google test after you remove any references to ""Scientific Creationism"" book titles). Additionally ""Scientific Creation"" as a unique term doesn't seem to have any sort of definition and as such just seems pointless and redundant to use in the opener. " +" Thank you so much for getting into this. The last couple of days my online time has been minimal (gasp! a social life!) but I expect to return to normal hardcore geekery shortly. Since I asked you for this it's only fitting to walk the walk. ) Best wishes, Charge! " +" STOP DELETING MY ADDITION. You, Muboshgu/Mephistophelian say: Please do not use talk pages ... for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat. If you continue to use talk pages as you do, you may be blocked from editing. You are using the talk page to push a POV rather than addressing the article in a constructive manner. Please stop. I AM NOT ""generally discussing a topic"", I AM NOT ""chatting"". I AM NOT ""pushing a P.O.V."". If you do not understand basic English grammar, you have no business telling me anything. FACT: commas are used in this context to separate a list, a series, of related clauses. Grammar is not a matter of a ""general discussion"" or ""chatting"" or a ""point of view"". It is a technically precise set of rules, and in this case, a set of rules that demonstrate that the foundation of the issue is a fraud. THIS IS NOT OPINION, IT IS FACT, IT IS RELEVANT TO THE ARTICLE, IT IS FOUNDATIONAL TO THE ARTICLE. I AM TALKING ABOUT IMPROVING THE ARTICLE BY CLARIFYING THE FOUNDATION ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR AS ANY LITERATE PERSON CAN SEE. AND I AM TALKING ABOUT ADDING THE RELEVANT AND FOUNDATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CLAUSE. FROM TALK GUIDELINES (why don't you review them!): There is reasonable allowance for speculation, suggestion, and personal knowledge on talk pages, with a view to prompting further investigation. make the extra effort so that other people understand you. Being friendly is a great help. It is always a good idea to explain your views; it is less helpful for you to voice an opinion on something and not explain why you hold it. Explaining why you have a certain opinion helps to demonstrate its validity to others and reach consensus. Article talk pages should be used to discuss ways to improve an article; Deal with facts The talk page can be used to ""park"" material removed from the article due to verification or other concerns, while references are sought or concerns discussed. The talk page is particularly useful to talk about edits. New proposals for the article can be put forward for discussion by other editors if you wish. Do not threaten people: For example, threatening people with ""admins you know"" or having them banned for disagreeing with you. Editing or even removing others' comments is sometimes allowed. But you should exercise caution in doing so, and normally stop if there is any objection. As I previously posted here: THE ARTICLE SHOULD BE IMPROVED by making it clear in the opening statement that the entire issue is a fraud upon the public since there is no ""natural born citizen"" requirement that is applicable today. That is fundamental to an informative relevant foundation to the article, not a matter of opinion, and a matter of grammatical fact. If I say ""No animal except a mouse, or a rat, at the time I give the signal, shall be captured"", then I am saying only mice and rats shall be captured AT THE TIME I GIVE THE SIGNAL. My order has no validity at any other point in time. Similarly, the requirement for ""natural born citizen"" only applied AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION. It does not apply today, and the following clause should be part of the article, since it is the clause at the foundation of the issue in the article: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. 209.112.188.15 " +" September 2010 (UTC) And disambiguation already exists at Stockman (disambiguation). No need to do anything more complicated than what's here. (talk) 15:42, 13" +" Gjalexei, you asked about whether there is an ""anti-editorializing"" policy here. There is, and it's called wikipedia:neutral point of view. It discusses at some length the case of what we should do when writing about a subject which most of us find repugnant. Whilst you're not likely to get too many defenders of FGM here, the need for the policy should be clearer for articles like abortion, for instance. If something you write is edited and you're not sure why, please continue to question such edits on the talk page. Sometimes, you'll learn more about wikipedia policy. Sometimes, you'll find out that some other people working on here can get it flat-out wrong ) Robert Merkel" +thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot thanks for watching wiki raid thread +Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Siad Barre, you may be blocked from editing. +" I love digging into historical details on neglected subjects! I was listening to ""Where the Wild Roses Grow"" and ended up reading up on murder ballads. I noticed that Cave's song was supposed to be inspired by ""Down in the Willow Garden"" (that's still not verified), and that an article on another song, ""The Knoxville Girl"", referred to it too - but we didn't have an article on it. I was intrigued by it having a couple of names, so I started digging. I even shelled out for the article by Wilgus as it was obviously the main reference for this song. &Windows; " +Hêbê Debate at the European Parliament: Wikipedia - Truth by Consensus? Oreo Priest! I see that you are a prolific Wikipedia editor! Do you live in Brussels by any chance? I ask, because there is a debate planned on the usefulness and reliability of Wikipedia at the European Parliament in Brussels on Monday evening, September 28th. If you are interested in either debating the subject or simply attending as an audience member, you can register on http://www.asbl-hebe.eu. For more info, I'd be happy to help, just email hebe-debates@asbl-hebe.eu. We would be happy to have you there! Kindest regards, +" Times you've watched? I've watched it at least 9 times, anyone else? @ " +I think it is also necessary to focus on the conflict between Shah Ismail(he was 100% Turkish) and Yavuz Sultan Selim(Selim I.). The reason of this conflict was government policies. The Ottoman Empire used Sunni Islam as the state policy and Shah used Shiite Islam as the state policy. You can find more about this in the book called, History of The Ottoman State, Society and Civilization which edited by E. Ihsanoglu and in the book, pages between 27-31. +There's a whole bloody article on the official Chiefs page confirming Love's Not A Competition! Read it and weep! As well as the promo And the video See? The evidence is too strong for it not to be a single! +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Cars discography. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +" Just another obvious note, NO-one personally attacked BG357 until after he called everyone editing RLM's article, members of the ""screw loose society"", check the history. If he has a problem with anger management and attacking people's character and slamming people here; maybe he should abstain from Wiki until he deals with the anger management issue. Calling a duck a duck isn't a personal attack, when someone lies, it does make them a liar by definition. The history logs here alone show that I did nothing but call a duck a duck." +As you are well aware WP:INFOBOXFLAG relates to all the other blind reverts you are performing which I have asked advice regarding. 50.121.48.234 +" The source material for the ""Einsatzgrupppe Ägypten"" on this article more than borders on comedic. Can't you at least cite two books by non-historians?" +Gold_heart Is there any end to your mischief. Alison couldn't give two hoots whether I lived or died. When I got depressed, she just ignored me and hung me out to dry. I do care, but she didn't care about me, but then, why should I care about her? I'm still alive in spite of all this, and I plan to stay that way. User:Gold_heart +Hi there, I am a new user (about two months) and live a peripatetic life, migrating from Nepal to St Paul Island, Alaska with frequent stops in Othello, Washington, where I grew up ages ago (I'm 51). I have had several 'careers' but now work as quality control and health and safety person (seasonally) for a small fish processing plant on St Paul island to finance my travels. My WP editing is mostly typos and usage stuff (see slaying slews on my user page), adding links to deadend pages, and I have started participating in some AfD debates, although not many. I have created one new article, the short and rather minorly important Corfu slide. I've had one small run-in with another editor (see Re: my copyvio tag on User talk:Noroton)regarding my mistaken blanking of an article for copyvio. I apoligized to him although I'm not sure if the article had been cleared although the notice was removed. The primary reason I requested adoption was that I am looking for some direction on copyvio matters. I hit the random page button alot and also work on deadend pages and I seem to be seeing tons of stuff that violates copyright, obvious cut and paste jobs about companies or persons, usually with a link to the copyvio right at the end of the article! Looking at WP:CV I seem to get conflicting directions. The first box advising proposing speedy deletion and leaving the article intact, the second box (titled 'Article?') saying to revert if possible, if not then blank the page, etc. Then I see this, '...Some cases will be false alarms. For example, if the contributor was in fact the author of the text that is published elsewhere under different terms, that does not affect their right to post it here under the GFDL. Also, sometimes you will find text elsewhere on the Web that was copied from Wikipedia. In both of these cases, it is a good idea to make a note in the talk page to discourage such false alarms in the future...,' in WP:C which would seem to allow most of the things I have tagged and/or deleted! I have done different things at different times, deleted copyvio and left a stub if I think it notable, proposed speedy, blanked and listed (the 'Article?' option), and with one exception, my mistake which I apologized for, I haven't received any feedback + or -. I must admit that the laziness rather than the legality of it is what bothers me about this as in most cases the website and article creator are probably one and the same, but still... Here is some examples. New page, West Wisconsin Telcom is a copy from the 'about' page of, you guessed it, [Wisconsin Telcom]. The page was created in one edit by a user with no other edits and no user or talk page. Marriage Equality New York Inc, is copied from: here Altoona community theatre which is copied from hereand here What is the proper way of dealing with this? Propose speedy delete and leave page intact? No clean revert so blank and use copyvio|url=www.wwt.net/aboutus.php, and the rest of the stuff in the 'Article?' box? Leave it for someone else to deal with and mind my own business? Wikipedia can be a little daunting to newcomers as there seems to be much jargon, abbreviations and references to seemingly conflicting WP pages and policies. I have no problem being bold but also don't want to be a jerk. It would be great to have someone with experience to check with on occasion. OK, that's what I'm really wondering about right now. I have stopped doing anything about copyvio for now other than adding pages to my watch list until I get some direction on this. Thnx, +Veritas-spanish Article. Some people continue erasing verifiable and up-dated information in the Spanish People's article about recently published books pointing to a strong link between Iberia and Atlantic Europe. Those books are Blood of the Isles, by Bryan Sykes, Origins of Britons, by Stephen Oppenheimer and Deep Ancestry, by Spencer Wells. What do you think of it? +You see Ghirlo, behave now..If not, ban is your next step.. +USS NAUTILUS SSN-571 Collision with USS ESSEX CVS-9, April 1967 I was a junior officer serving in ESSEX in 1967 as a CICWO. At the time of the collision I was soundly asleep in the junior officer bunkroom tucked under the flight deck in the forward section of the ship (We were standing Port and Starboard watches under Condition 1 AS, a modifified form of anti-submarine battle stations) when a loud noise was heard and a brief shudder passed through ESSEX, a 29k ton anti-submarine aircraft carrier. ESSEX went promptly to general quarters which is standard operating procedure for protecting a naval ship in the case of a collision of unknown proportions or a fire not under control as the crew immediately mans their battle ststions, including manning damage control parties, and sets Condition Zebra which secures all water-tight hatches throughout the ship. ESSEX, her task group comprised of several destroyer and destroyer escorts, and NAUTILUS were conducting exercises in the Virginia Capes Operations Area (VACAPESOPAREA. ESSEX was being replenished underway by a fleet oiler and both ships were being screened by the escorts. The wind was backing and the UNREP ships were altering ROMEO CORPEN (replenishment course) five degrees to port to put the relative wind 355 degree relative to their ship's head. NAUTILUS successfully penetrated the screen and was simulating torpedo attacks when she apparently miscalculated either her submerged depth and/or the course of the mainbody. NAUTILUS's conning tower struck ESSEX which draws 29 to 30 feet depending on how she is loaded, on the forward port quarter of her bow-mounted SONAR. NAUTILUS was believed to roll to starboard and to pass under ESSEX keel rerighting herself as she executed an emergency surfacing procedure in he vicinity of ESSEX elevator on her starboard side, some 500-600 feet from her bow. NAUTILUS appeared as though the forward leading corner of her sail area had been bitten cleanly off. Injuries were minor to two NAUTILOS crewman and to a Sonarman First Class in ESSEX. NAUTILUS did not suffer any apparent damage to her nuclear reactor or powerplant. No leaks of radioactive material were reported as testimony to her thorough construction. ESSEX's bow mounted sonar was badly dented/deformed but the ship's water-tight integrity was never breached, and she transited to the Boston Naval Shipyard for repairs and deployed in late May 1967 for an EASTLANT NATO Anti-submarine exercise (ASWEX). +Controversies - Did he had conspired 9/11? I don't want to make Wikipedia offended (primarily the article), but I think it's strange that he had financed to implode the buildings on the World Trade Center. I don't think it would be relevant in the article by Wikipedia's standards or if I would receive a notification on disruption or something like that. Here I go. He is a Jewish person right? He wanted to implode the buildings for a war on Islam. Secondly, there was a television tower on top of the World Trade Center - does that seem weird to you people? That was all done for capitalism, propaganda, scare tactics, exploitation and viewers? No one talks about that. The television agencies wanted them to blame Islam for good measure, because of oil. Oil, television agencies, government power, and lobbyist, in a government operated building. This man who had made up 9/11 is Jewish… It was all over religions… Jews versus Islams… Now governmental Jews are in power again only because of this incident … Just months before 9/11, there was over $3.4 trillion dollars financed to the city, and they agreed to this situation; however, he had gained profit from the victims, which he's at $7 billion (USD). He had knew about the asbestos before he had bought the World Trade Center in 1980's. Plus the towers of 2, 3, 4, and 7 - were over $10 billion (USD - with tax). 18:28 September 12 2013 +Right on the CNNMoney! Thank you for telling me about the rastered SVG to the right! I didn't realize it until you informed me, and now that I know, I will fix the problem in Adobe Illustrator, and immediately upload a new file. Thanks for also categorizing the file, it helps to show the file's influence on Wikipedia ;-). Thank you so much! +" I think some of NealParr's comments above are extremely misleading about this source. The age of the Langmuir reference is irrelevant, because Park only uses the Langmuir reference to define pathological science. Then Park, writing in 2000, after ""all the research from the 1970s, all the criticism to come after, and all the changes made by parapsychologists in response to criticism"" argues that the term still applies to parapsychology at the time he is writing. NealParr's comment that Park is being ""unfair"" is just NealParr's opinion. Shoemaker's Holiday is correct (as usual) that the source cannot be used for the opinions of multiple scientists, but it is a notable, general and recent criticism. " +Hindi Seems like you got confused with pro-Hindustani editors. Here is 65 year old statement: Article 351. Directive for development of the Hindi language- It shall be the duty of the Union to promote the spread of the Hindi language, to develop it so that it may serve as a medium of expression for all the elements of the composite culture of India and to secure its enrichment by assimilating without interfering with its genius, the forms, style and expressions used in Hindustani and in the other languages of India specified in the Eighth Schedule, and by drawing, wherever necessary or desirable, for its vocabulary, primarily on Sanskrit and secondarily on other languages. http://rajbhasha.nic.in/UI/pagecontent.aspx?pc=MzU= Hindi emerged as Apabhramsha, a degenerated form, in the 7th century A.D. By the 10th century A.D., it became stable. 'Braj, Awadhi, Khari Boli etc are the dialects of Hindi'. The present literary standard of Hindi is based on 'Khari Boli'. Hindi became the official language of India after 1947 http://hindinideshalaya.nic.in/english/hindi_orgin/briefhistory.html Where are other languages of India ? What about Braj bhasha, Khadi Boli, Awadhi, Chattisgariya ? They can call Hindi as much as Urdu speaking people are calling Hindi as Hindustani. The Hindi I speak has more Punjabi & English words than Urdu. The list goes on. 65 years are more than enough to change a language. We know that Hindi of 1960s is not same as Hindi of today. Even Indian English has emerged as major L2 speakers of English in last 65 years. +Bring it, I pit sources...MY YEARBOOKS. +" Oh, you should have trouted me. ) I meant the editcount criterion for autoconfirmation. P '''' Voting'' IS " +" Looks like, among other things, he was that, at least near the end of his life. HR vol. 15 no. 3 (May / June 1995), pg. 46: In a letter, Martin writes, ""Personally, I am about brimful (sic?) on 'gas chambers' and may stop reading about the subject. As I have mentioned, I classify them with unicorns; for centuries Europeans have believed tenaciously in the latter since at least the time of Aristotle, but in all that time never came up with one. Maybe there will be centuries of belief in 'gas chambers' with the same consequences. I am sure the 'hoax Establishment must stick by this fantasy, for to admit that it is all smoke would seriously undermine faith in anything else they allege. However, they did slink off from the fable of soap made from Jewish fat..."" One letter of Martin's which is available online appeared in JHR vol. 12 no. 2 (Summer 1992), pg. 251). In a letter entitled ""Reflections on a Death,"" Martin writes about the Holocaust, ""...the Holocaustians have turned the whole thing into a new religion anyway. To me there is a close relation between a racket like this one and spiritualism, for example. Holocaust zealots trap their revisionist critics in much the same way that the spiritualists treated their scoffers during their heyday...The 'Hoaxers' do much the same thing: the more outrageous of the Holocaust atrocities they endlessly circulate don't have to be proven. Instead, it is up to those who deny they happened to prove they did not...One of these days I should try to get a foundation to underwrite a trip to central Africa. After returning I would announce that I had encountered a tribe of talking monkeys, and then challenge anyone who does not believe me to prove otherwise."" (See: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p245_Letters.html#Martin) (above from ). That, and spending 25 years hanging out with IHR puts at the very least a serious taint of holocaust denial on his fascinating resume. ∇∆∇∆ " +Images from greatestbattles.iblogger.org iblogger.org is on the blacklist so images from it should not be used. See also the whitelist discussion| +" Thank you for the ""warning""! I'm about just to write the article about the song, however, will need probably still some days. - Here can you talk to me! 17:08, June 6th, 2008 (CEST)" +. Ok I chose a bad example - as there are lots of meanings for Giant, but you get the idea. Apply it to Pirare or Mariner or other similar things +" Hmmm, maybe at this point I should go with Shrike's tactic: """" But I won't. So. Since you already have the source, I know that you know that the source has nothing to do with dhimmitude. So why are you insisting on including it in the article? " +Who gives a shit? Anthony Bourdain is a tool. I just wish he had children so I could stomp on there testicals. Just kidding but he is a massive tool. He couldn't carry Emerils jockstrap. Next time I see him I'll knock his teeth out.... +case it wasn't a mistakePLEASE keep an eye on this page +" This article suffers from poor translation - whether that is someones idosyncracy, or a translation engine run amok. Actually it is not too bad if it JUST a translation engine... Additionally, it reads rather like a self-aggrandizing press release. Oh well. Biography and creativity [edit] Early years Viktoria Daynekos born on 12 May 1987 in village in the Kirov Taldy-Kurgan area. Her childhood was spent in the Yakut city Mirny (Yakutia). Since her childhood, she dreamed of becoming a variety singer, but her parents did not take her desire seriously. In school, Victoria (Vika) started to sing various Mirny (Yakutia) musical genres, mainly covering the hits of others. As she was in a small town, without any special educational institutions, Vika educated herself. Vika seriously engaged the English language. [edit] Star Factory Alla Pugacheva is DOUBTLESS a link here... should be looked up and added In 2004 Victoria was the participant of the Channel One’s teleproject Star Factory Series 5 under the direction of Alla Pugacheva, which she won. Within the limits of the teleproject, Victoria sang two solo songs — «I will be better» and ""Leila"". Vika also sang a duet with Alexander Marshal «Dreamed me». ((I Dreamed?! Dreamed of me,?!)) The duet was so pleasant to the public, that it has been decided to make a joint clip — Victoria's first video. [edit] ""Post-factory"" life [edit] 2005—2006 After the termination of the teleproject, Victoria began serious work Igor Matvienko. The debut clip of singer for the song ""Leila"" was shot in 2005 in Thailand. New songs with which, Vika acted on the various platforms, new further clips have followed. In parallel with this development, Victoria's life was often discussed in press—in 2006, the singer dated the member of the group «Korni» Pavel Artemyev. Although the affair did not last long, it has left a trace — a clip plot on a song of Dayneko «I will simply leave from you at once» (""Я просто сразу от тебя уйду"") based on the idea of director Victor Priduvalov and a hit has been closely connected with the Korni’s clip «You want I will sing to you» (""Хочешь, я тебе спою"") [edit] 2007 In the beginning of 2007, Victoria wrote a soundtrack to the film «In expectation of a miracle» — «Film not about love». A videoclip on this song was made in parallel with filming. She was nominated in the autumn of 2007 as «Best performer» in the MTV Russia Music Awards. ((Fragment, as a result of having conceded to the singer MakSim.)) Also she was the winner channel Fashion TV award «fashion-singer of 2007». In the beginning of the same year, Victoria took part in photos for April issue of magazine Playboy, which she has regretted. In 2007 she also participated in the project Glacial Age. In this project she was ""star"", being trained and supported by Alexei Yagudin — the first class figure skater. Victoria and Alexei reached the project ending, but did not reach prize-winning places. With Alexei, Vika wrote a song ""Needle"", of which there has been made a videoclip. There are rumours about a novel. To date, theya re only rumours. Also in 2007 Victoria tried out in film. She appeared in a a small, bit part, in a teleserial «Happy Together», where Vika has played herself; She has also has voiced the main heroine Panti in an animation «Noev an ark» with the Russian version of a Gloria Gaynor’s song «I Will Survive». [edit] 2008— present On 6 March 2008 She released a debut album ""Needle"". The album became «the collection of hits of the singer» as it was the first album for 3 years of work. Now Victoria begins work on the second album. [edit] Releases [edit] Discography «Needle» (2008) [edit] Track-list 1.Needle (Иголка) (feat. Alexei Yagudin) 2.What I lose (Что теряю я) 3.Film not about love (Фильм не о любви) 4.Stop, where do I go (Стоп, куда же я иду) 5.Not yours (Не твоя) 6.Leila (Лейла) 7.I will simply leave you at once (Я просто сразу от тебя уйду) 8.Game for you 9.I am jealous to you (Тебя ревную) 10.I will be better (Я буду лучше) 11.Hundred steps (Сто шагов) (Russian version of Sam Brown’ song «Stop (Before)») 12.Russian version of a Gloria Gaynor’s song «I Will Survive» (Я буду жить) 13.Forget (Забудь) 14.Film not about love (Фильм не о любви) (Triplex Latino mix) 15.I will simply leave you at once (Я просто сразу от тебя уйду) (Triplex electro mix) 16.I will be better (Я буду лучше) (Remix) [edit] Clips Dreamed me («Снилось мне») (with Alexander Marshal) (2004) Leila («Лейла») (2005) I will simply leav +Warning Me If you dare to warn me I dont really give a rip. I will delete them and keep on deleteing them. I am making a new account so BHAHA +Fine. I will destroy you. Xchanter +" Please Use Edit Summaries When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled ""Edit summary"" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. " +Sorry about the late reply. I'll see what I can do, but I'm about to start doing some major research outside of Wikipedia on a whole other project unrelated to Levantine archaeology. | Say Shalom! 27 Tevet 5775 +Please stop Please stop blocking me. It's just irritating having to to spend the two seconds I have to to get round the block. Just leave this between myself and Schumin. +"::Original research...'nuff said. ♣ Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ " +Howdy! Saw you help clean up the Vertical Archipelago page I created, and clicked on your profile. Looks like we got a lot of interests in common! ) Look forward to working with you in the future (or otherwise help you widen the scope of economics and philosophy and other social science articles here)! Cheers! +burn in hell motherfucker +Toys/Pram eh ? Being persecuted by the big bad English again, awww diddums. Grow up you big fucking baby. +" Actually, none for being female; and everyone in general. You're coming out of this rather well, as it is being acknowledged that you are not an abuser of women but rather an ""equal opportunity insulter and belittler"". Still, it still isn't great to be considered an asshole. But least it is being understood that you aren't a misogynist. Now please don't violate your ArbCom restrictions because I posted this, OK?? (talk) " +" If most Protestants were not 'informers' that would probably be because they had no information to pass on. However I think Sarah unwittingly and superbly illustrates the reason why using the word 'informer' in this article is utterly inappropriate and far from neutral. She says ""common usage in Ireland [so] describes (then and now), local inhabitants who give information to the British."" But Ireland then and now also includes the Protestant north whose Protestant inhabitants see themselves as British and would no more think of not 'informing' than would an American who spotted an Al Quaeda operative setting up an ambush in Chicago. And they would not be pleased to have the epithet 'informer' thrown at them. Irish Protestants in the south then, or the north now would never use the word 'informer' in this context and their view should not be disregarded in Wikipedia. Sarah may assume they do not exist or are irrelevant but their continued existence is the reason she is editing this article in the first place. Neutrality requires another phrasing. " +. To avoid innocent players being put on the list, we should get verification from at least 4 people who play the game and say this person did so and so before they are put on the naughty list +" I was rather intrigued by the addition made by 76.191.230.178, ""that on June 5th, the United States sent Israel ammunition and jet fighters"", taken from Quigley's ""The Case for Palestine"" (p. 162). Quigley's book can be viewed on both Google Books and Amazon, where this exact statement appears with a reference to page 216 in Donald Neff's ""Warriors For Jerusalem"" (1984). I troubled myself to the library and found the relevant paragraphs. In an episode titled ""June 5: Israel Attacks"", Neff says the following about president Johnson (top of page 216): ""He also received a message from his friend Arthur Krim. A memorandum to the President that day read: ""Arthur Krim reports that many arms shipments are packed and ready to go to Israel, but are being held up. He thinks it would be most helpful if these could be released."" Under the message the President had scribbled: ""1,000 rounds of 105mm artillery shells cleared. 2,000 fuses - availability, Gas masks. New Requests: A-4 jet fighter-bombers Hawk antiaircraft missiles."" Before the day was out, Krim was informed that gas masks had already been dispatched to Israel and he left a message for Johnson expressing his appreciation."" That's it. The rest of the page deals with various people he met and communicated with, and has nothing to do with arms shipments of any kind. In short, Quigley's assertion that ""on June 5th, the United States sent Israel ammunition and jet fighters"" is unsupported by the evidence he provides. The only thing documented as sent are gas masks. There's no indication if and when any ammunition had even been dispatched and an Israeli request for jet fighters, possibly made on June 5, somehow becomes jet fighters sent to Israel. In light of this I am deleting the sentence from the article. " +" (UTC) I didn't hear you. What did you say? | Contact Assembly of Jimbo Wales 01:08, 23 March 2009" +I know I shouldn't, guess I have a conditioned knee-jerk response to his ilk. Have you checked out his contribution history? He seems to have a very odd definition of what's NPOV and what belongs on Wikipedia in general, not just for Spurlock. - +Census population figures Hello M.Nelson, I see you have reverted a recent population change on the Calgary article. Your comments were that 2006 census stats are to be used only. I have done the same with a recent pop change at the Halifax Regional Municipality article. I have reverted it once and it has again been changed. I don't know where the guidelines are or anything so I can't tell the IP otherwise. Perhaps you could help ? Thanks. +Samuel Smiles wrote long after the Wealden iron industry was extinct. Anything good that he discovered on the subject has long been overtaken by detailed archival research incorporated into the works by Staker and by Cleere and Crossley, cited as main sources. I would strongly recommend that Smiles shold NOT be cited. +Are you moron or stupid or both? I created my personal page for this, so move all this bloody useful information there if it is necessary. +" June 2007 (UTC) You know what I also found? I also found a paper that mentions that the maximum tensile strength for single-walled carbon nanotubes is 60GPa. Whoops! Given that ""I found it"", it's clearly original research, by your logic. Finding such a paper is no different than finding others mentioning things about this show other than ""reliability"" of that source. Finding someone mentioning something and reporting on it is *not* original research, no matter how you cut it, unless that person was you. 02:24, 30" +Your Request to Assess Articles Hey, I got your request will try to do 20-30 of them a day over the next weeks. Cheers +Oh yeah, I forgot you were into legos. I saw this recently, which you might be interested in. +MotherFucker i have static ip address connection now suck my black dick and enjoy. +" Cheers. (Talk | Contribs) " +" This needs the NPOV to be fixed as well. Consider moving this article to the title Allopathy and stop calling it ""evidence-based"", because allopathy is primarily fueled by drug companies, not science. " +"It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Sulphuric acid. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you.  — talk " +Deaths section unnecessary I think the Deaths section is unnecessary as they are already mentioned in the plot synopsis which is already overly long. A summary of the deaths in the films is overkill. +" The most common name for the British Isles is, like it or not, the British Isles. Do you deny that? Couldn't care less what you call them so long as anything called ""British"" doesn't include Ireland. ""British Isles"" is not the most common name for any entity that includes Ireland. It is almost never used in Ireland. " +"that ""banned me"" " +" Harassment? Kafziel, you are just not serious. I have not intention discussing this with you, until you can fill out a block form without tripping over yourself..Wolfowitz " +Overseas Chinese Oh, my…. I’m sorry, dude…. I did not even notice the second a… I glossed right over it. But, yeah; neither a should be there. Thanks.  )    —Wiki Wikardo +fuck you george akhtak sharmota +Anon, I don't think I did this. Can you be more specific? 22:40, September 4, 2005 (UTC) +Netball video Not beautiful but video. I have higher quality but it doesn't appear to want to upload. If you want to try to include in the relevant article, awesome sauce. ) +Fair enough, none of my old aircraft books even mention the A-12, only the SR-71, let alone the Oxcart codename or program name and as it was a CIA aircraft, unlike the SR-71 which was USAF, it is only mentioned in CIA sources. The U2 never had any codename, defacto or otherwise. I'm satisfied with the extra paragraph in the introduction that explains the association and will not seek to push the matter further but I do feel strongly that the paragraph in the intro explaining the association not be edited out in the future! +Despite what the comment on the ANI said I think it would be best to take the matter to ArbCom. This isn't a single edit issue (i.e. the wording or neutrality of one article). This is issue is the nonconstructive behavior and POV/OR editing pattern of user Patchouli. From my understanding RfC is best when both parties are cooperative, and this is not that case here. Thus it should be taken to ArbCom. Agha Nader +Please checkout the links there. It's all fake and not working. So, Is it verified? It's not. Because the links provided there is broken +What is the criteria for a character being included in the cast list? I don't think it should be anyone other than major characters since complete cast lists can be found elsewhere. +Response You are not above criticism. I am not the first person to refer to you as passive-aggressive and I doubt I will be the last. If you recall you are the one who first instigated personal attacks in just that manner. If you don't like those low standards, please don't be the one to lower them. +Re: Warning: no personal attacks; assume good faith I have on my talk page. +Sorry, let me refocus my point. I have nothing wrong with the picture of the statue, I just don't think it conveys much at all especially at the limited resolution/space on the page for the image. I would suggest either no picture or a picture of some historical text that has some sort of anti-rape law printed. Thanks for the prompt responses. +Do you have any reasons based on policy? You comment is unimpressive. At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of WikiLeaks mirrors, excepting the comments by the canvassed single purpose accounts, which were properly disregarded, 95%+ of the comments favored deletion (or virtually 100% if you exclude soapboxing-type comments). I recommend not wasting your time, and more importantly the time of other editors. It is uncivil and improper to conduct needless disputes. Talk +" You certainly weren't forced to create a POV fork. But that is in the past now, why don't you start a discussion about what should be included on the article talk page, and discuss it with Tadija and other involved editors? talk " +"Hello! My name is Eric, and it's my pleasure to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I've noticed you've started making contributions, which is a great thing! On that note, I'd like to invite you to create an account. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including: The use of a username of your choice The ability to view all your contributions via a ""My contributions"" link Your own user page Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you The ability to rename pages The ability to upload images The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website The eligibility to become an administrator The right to be heard in votes and elections Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users. We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and stay for a long time. No matter whether you choose to create an account or not, I hope you will continue to be a productive (not destructive) member of our community as we strive to make this one of the greatest sites on the world wide web. | (Leave me a message!) " +please stop him, h makes them cry +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Gran Turismo 5. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. chat " +I thought the maximum has been 26% ethanol. I checked some recent UNICA papers and they are currently referring to a max. of 25% and 25% is also easier because we seem to do these things in steps of 5%. +2007 (UTC) suggestionwhy not then do as I did, and simply say who you are? '''''' 07:08, 9 September +Vandalism reverted I have revereted the anon's vandalism in the Iraq article. +" Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship ADD: Waugaman, Richard M. ""The Sternhold and Hopkins Whole Book of Psalms Is a Major Source for the Works of Shakespeare."" Notes & Queries 56 (2009): 595-604. Waugaman, Richard M. ""Echoes of the Whole Book of Psalms in Shakespeare’s 1 Henry VI, Richard II, and Edward III."" Notes & Queries 57.3 (2010): 359-364." +Eubulides claims that there are many POV in chiropractic according to his list however everything he wants deleted is always a source that supports the efficacy of chiropractic care, in some way shape or form. Furthermore, as a medical doctor, Eubulides' edits and his intention behind them are deplorable and his claims of POV are either grossly exaggerated or without merit. +! Hi I,m or I removed the user name Jeanelle J Intila to Jeanelle Intila because this names are similar in this page. Thank you! +hey do u have any problem with tulu people trying to show all tulu people as kannada,if u keep on doing this karnataka will surely be eaten up tamils and telugu,suppresing linguistic minorities from your own state won't do any good ok and anways kannda is language that borrows heavily from sanskrit and i don;t know which stupid person gave it a classical language status +No, it was said in ep. 26. 76.95.66.209 +Greek primacy I'm in two minds myself. But Talk page discussion is required before twice blanking an article. +i wasnt reverting as u see just fixing the article back. i didnt know fixing the articles from vandalism could be considered 3rr. also the vandalism was over 3 hours ago. ( ) +they are one sided....one tells about the kids history(which they dont have his criminal history) making him seem like he was anice and good kid. the other site is a blog site which is against wikipedia standards....thank you anoymous...... +You cannot revert based on previous AFD unless the article is essentially the same READ POLICY +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Regina Halmich, you will be blocked from editing. a If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." +That is a guideline - it is an anime guideline. If it wasn't a guideline, you wouldn't see people citing it as the reason they do it. And being the most accurate name is not helpful to the reader. If readers didn't exist, Wikipedia wouldn't exist. The most accurate as well as the most common name is preferred for the sake of the reader. - (talk) +Could you help me? I want to do a family tree chart on illyrian godsin the same format as thisAeneas Family tree +Blockage The admin said the block would be 48 hours, its been more, what is the deal??? +The Image The main image; it's not clean to non-fans which beastie is which. +Here's the problem, I just checked one of the episode descriptions; 422. It was a blatant, Google findable copyvio. (From here, though I think it was an NBC press-clippings None of us put it there, but it is still problematic. The rest need to be carefully checked now. Fun, fun, fun. +" DYK reply Hi Orlady. I posted a reply to your request at Twist lifts. ☼ " +" :rolls eyes:: You'd think people would have better things to do, ya know? Thanks. • • • 06:07 (UTC) 17 Mar '08" +" Image:Greatlakeswimmers.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Greatlakeswimmers.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tast " +Thanks for getting back to me I will reply there. +Infobox Should we keep the old infobox as less parties have seats here (ie Respect, UKIP, SDLP, SNP, Sinn Fein, DUP, Green etc) and keep the new infobox for the main UK election article? +" External Memory I believe that the External Memory section should be broken into two separate sections or more firmly defined within the same section. One on ""Self Identity"" and using external objects to identify one's self, and ""External Memory"" being stored memories and information. Here are my reasons. Self Identity: In ""Stand Alone Complex"" Episode 25, Batou says to Kusunagi about her watch ""No matter how many prosthetic bodies you went through, this was the one thing that was always ticking away the same time as you, right? In this time that's far too fleeting, people entrust memories to external devices because they want to set down proof that can identify them as a unique individual. For you, isn't that watch the one external mnemonic device that can identify the person you've been up until now?"" This says that external mnemonic devices are to create a sense of unchanging self in a world where you can switch physical bodies on the fly. As biological humans our forms are fixed and unchanging for the most part and our self identity is tied deeply with that. In the GiTS universe, that is not true and you must tie your self-identity to external objects such as a watch or weight training to distinguish yourself from the rest of the identical mass produced cyborg bodies and create a sense of individuality. There are references in SAC 2ng Gig Episode 8 about cyborg food satisfying the brains cravings and as a reminder of times before becoming a cyborg. In SAC 2nd Gig Episode 11 there is a store that keeps and maintains external mnemonic devices that remind their owners of their own personal memories. All of these ""external mnemonic devices"" are used to trigger memories in one's self, but can not relay detailed information to a stranger. External Memory: External Memory is exactly that, memories and experiences that are stored ""offline"" onto a hard disk or such. If you posses a cyber brain, there is a definite separation of mind and body since your brain case can be removed and put into a new body. Since there is an electronic separation, the signals received from the senses (touch, taste, etc.) can be recorded and replayed at any given time. Thus, you could record important events such as your wedding day and replay it as if you were actually there anytime you wish. Your external senses turn off, and you’re fed recorded sensory information. Better than any video camera recording, your feeling the heat of the sun, the breeze, your brides’ hand trembling as you slip the ring on her finger, etc. Storing these memories also allows others to play them back and experience them as well. This would be a highly valuable technology for all areas of use; fully immersive gaming and movies, virtual business meetings that feel completely real, instantaneous access to wikipedia anywhere. In SAC 2ng Gig Ep 23, Batou talks about using Kusunagi's external memories to keep Gohda talking in Ep 22. He also talks about peeking at her external memories regarding Kuze. In SAC Ep 10 Ishikawa experiences Batou's memories from the murder scene. SAC Ep 21 the whole team replays Togusa's memories from the Sunflower Society office when he was shot. " +2007 (UTC) Hmm, I thought it was Big Brother not The Biggest Loser 15:34, 30 June +This article has some helpful information, but it is all unsourced, while the Art valuation article is fully sourced. This article should be cleaned up and sourced before merging. +" Forgot to sign again damn, I'm getting OLD @-► Talk to the Vorlons►Markab-@ 18:08" +The swastika was a braiding tool & spinning tool http://rexcurry.net/swastika-braiding.html The article needs information about the new discovery that shows how the ancient swastika was a tool used for braiding and spinning, as explained by Dr. Rex Curry at http://rexcurry.net/swastika-braiding.html +" ANI Discussion I am currently blocked and unable to properly defend myself at a discussion at WP:ANI. I request that a neutral admin copy this content to that area. writes: ""Yet again, I ask LedRush, the 152.x.x.x IP, or anyone else, to point out any time where myself, MLauba, John or any other admin who has acted administravely here has edited the article to favour one POV or the other. Here's a clue - you can't, because it hasn't happened. Either put up or shut up. Black Kite (t) (c) "" Really? says here that there has been systematic exclusion of reliable sources. Look at the responses by to my list of reliable sources on the Meredith Kercher topic. here. I have fully proven that Black Kite engaged in ""systematic exclusion of reliable sources."" False allegations of AGF and NPA were made against me for saying the same thing that Jimbo found when he came to the page. I have another idea. How about somebody go over and remove 's block of Gregmm. Let's see if he's a sockpuppet or not. What can it hurt to unblock him and see what happens. " +3RR WARNING You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. +" Actually I like the ""aftermath"" too. It is appropriate and gives a better sense. Gen. Yazici was a WWI Gallipoli veteran afterall. " +" Well you're being dishonest in at least one point there, so I'm not sure what the purpose of this discussion is. At 1280x1024, for example, in fully updated FF, the edit links are indeed obscured. MOS is trumped by accessibility issues, period. Whitespace is purely cosmetic and therefore unimportant when it comes to ability of people to easily edit the page. Period. The gallery was merely an error; I had a long night at the restaurant and forgot to increase the size from the example template given. →  ₪ " +everyone in discussion was invited by michaeldsuarez . not everyone who vote but everyone in discuss +User page deletion Why exactly do you want your User page deleted? ☎ +" Not quite accurate The article says: ""It debuted in November 2004 with Counter-Strike: Source and Half-Life 2."" This is technically incorrect as CS:S officially came out on October 7th, 2004. So I changed the month and dropped the mention of HL2. dethtoll" +STICK IT RIGHT UP UR ASS +What are your motivations for Vandalizing articles? You shoud consider more ethical behaviour. Your motivations might be from racism to political. Whatever they are, you are a bad guy. Why did you choose Damiens as an Icon? This historical figure is not a good example. You should choose somebody less violent than an anarchist murderer. +"=List Of Missing Albums=== See Above for details. this way its easier to see what is missing EPS Green Day '97 (7""EP) Pick a Winner (7""EP) Berkley Block Buster (7""EP) Don't Want To Know If You Are Lonely (7"" Vinyl - Split EP) And if we want this as well Look for love (7""EP) Films The Boys Are Back In Town Green Day: Sweet Children To American Idiots Compilation Green Day (Promo CD) ==" +" Copyvio Please do not replace existing free images with copyrighted images. Thanks. Additionally, please do not use blatantly false licenses on the images you upload. Copyright violations are considered very serious. Thanks. Image copyright problem with Image:Bert mcCraken.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Bert mcCraken.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it. Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mylovepic1.JPG) Thanks for uploading Image:Mylovepic1.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image copyright problem with Image:Justinsexybackmakingthevideocap1.JPG Thanks for uploading Image:Justinsexybackmakingthevideocap1.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it. Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blocked You have been blocked for 24 hours for your continued violation of Wikipedia image copyright and fair-use requirements. You have been blocked for 48 hours. Your first action back from your previous block was to blatantly violate Wikipedia's image copyright and fair-use policies once again. If you are caught doing this again, your next block will be for substantially longer. Please r +Notability This article seems to really raise notability issues. This was raised during creation by an unregistered editor who possibly created an account to create the article. Same editor appears to have also attempted to haphazardly de-orphan this article by loosely linking it to other articles. There was some light mention upon release and nothing sense. In the media section appears to be attempting to drum up notability. One of the references is not a 3rd party as the article was written by a financier. Reading notability guide again, I really this article lacks it. Lets disucss. +" You have a better chance of seeing Jesus hit a home run for the Red Sox tonight then ever see me edit Wikipedia again, and the Red Sox don't even play tonight. I have always believed Wikipedia to be a complete pile of garbage (and apparently my block was extended by a day for saying that) and this incident demonstrates my beliefs nicely. I work in the baseball industry, am pretty successful (have free time today due to the small number of night games), and also happen to have a degree in English from a fairly good school. Yet because I do not suffer fools when falsely accused of ""using original research"" when trying to correct atrocious grammar, I am not wanted, while the person who made the false accusation, abusively put an ""edit warring"" template on my page, and went crying to the admins when he didn't get his way, is considered a valuable asset to Wikipedia. Had we both been blocked for a day and told to knock it off, I wouldn't care. I am completely civil when other people are civil to me. When people use false accusations like ""false original research"" and ""edit warring"" for a lone edit, I'm afraid I have trouble responding in a civil manner. I am not one to turn the other cheek, unless Jesus hits a home run for the Red Sox. 68.81.192.142 " +@]] 04:15, 2005 Jan 7 +Help needed with User:Metrónomo Can you please help me explain to about his/her sig? The user's sig contains an image, a violation of WP:SIG#Images. It appears the the user's language is Spanish, and since I don't know Spanish, I can't explain it. The place to do this would be es:Usuario Discusión:Metrónomo. Od Mishehu +and having edited under my ip to avoid a 1r restriction (my temper again) +Sorry, proper procedure is not for you to choose an Admin—certainly not a friendly Admin, and here, one with as many civility issues as you—to sit in adjudication over this issue. In fact, I think you are both specifically prohibited from this sort of politicking (esp. the Admin). Am I not correct? No, I will elevate it, thank you. Le Prof +Will you please stop it with the forum shopping and canvassing? +" Problems with the new introduction First paragraph: 1. No one ""discovered"" Ancient Egyptians: they have been known to their neighbors since the dawn of civilization. 2. ""Everyone seems to enjoy"" is not a phrase one should use in an encyclopedia article. 3. Speculating on the reasons certain scholars are involved in this discussion is just a step away from an argumentum ad hominem. Second paragraph: The 'Eurocentrist' position (i.e. that Ancient Egypt was predominantly Caucasian) is still excluded, which makes the intro biased. Third paragraph: ""it is very clear that this is not a question that will have an answer to for some time"" is pure speculation (i.e. POV, i.e. original research: how did you come to this conclusion?) ==== The racial identity of ancient Egyptians has been steeped in controversy ever since the discovery of their existence. Everyone seems to enjoy the mysterious nature of the Ancient Egyptians and for many different reasons, be it for prosperity or to clear historical inaccuracies, want to claim them as their own. There are many different opinions on their racial makeup. One opinion among some scholars is that ancient Egypt was a multi-racial society. Another opinion held by other scholars is that that ancient Egyptians were black African peoples, claiming that this ""black identity"" was strongest in early Egyptian history and waned over time. They also assert Egypt remained essentially a black African civilization throughout the dynastic era. Then we also have many other historians reluctant to make definitive claims about the skin color of its inhabitants. Although the mainstream position has changed over time,it is very clear that this is not a question that will have an answer to for some time. ===" +" The passage I quoted makes no mention of the ""infobox UK place template"" being an exception to the rule. " +Did you remove my post on the discussion page for Dog Latin too? Harry Potter spells are relevant for that article because that's obviously the most prominent use of Dog Latin in popular culture. How could you have no mention of Harry Potter incantations in the Dog Latin article? Seems to me you're a partisan trying to censor stuff that you don't agree with. +SHut the fuck up you motherfucker, you probably engage with incest with your deceased grandmother... +World Caloric Output I read the fact that the world produces enough calories to give everyone 2800 per day if there was a better system of distribution. (Or incentive to distribute it.) I was asked to provide a source and came up with this one with Google which provides sources and additional information. Calculating the world caloric output is probably impossible, but this information seems relevant to this article. I'm not sure where it should go, though. +" This article is about the first Pahlavi Shahanshah who toppled the Qajarid dynasty. Now, comparing the last Shahanshah of Iran, who ruled over 33 years ago with Muammar Gaddafi who was killed merely weeks ago is ignorance speaking for itself... But not as surprising as the tone with which you have assumed. As for Germany, you are not really in a position to compare the brutality of Kemalist autocrats in the Third World (Where much of the society was still held at a tribal level and required strong leaders to commence modernization on a national scale), with the cold-blooded campaign of eradicating ""Untermenschen"" in the name of Aryan purity (Of which, you are nothing but thieving Germanic apes) during the WW2. Now that is what I call a stain that will never rub off. The same West Germany sold chemical weapons of mass destruction to Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war, where tens of thousands of civilians and soldiers in Iran still suffer from their effects. And speaking of Gaddafi, the same NATO that hail themselves, ironically, as ""liberators of Libya"" (In spite of causing civilian casualties) now want financial concessions from that war-torn country! Disgusting Westerner is still a disgusting Westerner. Do us all a favour and do not speak of human rights, hypocrite. If the Iranian nation has performed self-flagellation throughout her past, your empathy as a feeling human being is welcome; your judgement, while you wave the German flag, is not. " +LOL - you just do that. +"Another problem: in one place French is described as ""more commonly spoken"" at another the indigenous dialect related to French is described as the dominant language. Is there a debate about this, or is one or the other a mistake.64.126.139.56 " +While I cannot speak for typatigertot, it is of my opinion that TAS faculty have always been dysfunctional retards; this phrase is not too extreme +Reviews The Allmusic review is so close to a direct quote that you should either quote it exactly or paraphrase. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) For a 55 metacritic rating, I thought nearly half of the comments might be positive. That is not the case. Am I mistaken? (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) +" Can we work together? On the circumcision topic ... I'd like to redo the outline, add sexual effects information, and more informed consent (discord) information. As always, I support efforts to make those articles more neutral and comprehensive. As you can expect significant resistance, I suggest you start by doing some research to turn up reliable sources. " +Who was Ohtahara? I'm assuming (from the name and medical nomenclature conventions) that he was (1) Japanese, at least by descent and (2) the researcher who first described the syndrome, but what was his full name, where was he working, and when did he do the formal description? All of this is interesting and encyclopedic information that deserves to be in the article, if it can be found. +Please take a look at this page and click the linked Category:Former countries in Chinese history. Both Imperial China and Imperial Chinese tributary system are not supported. No, I do not agree with your proposal at here as I did on the talk page of Joseon. I don't think there's no violation at all. +" I actually missed the referenced link and you did not place it here (please add it) - onto the ""backed up by evidence"" part. I don't know about the materials you've been reading and the people you've been talking with, but it's surveys and statements by arab officials that matter - not a general conception/gut feeling - if you dispute a material which seems to be valid (and ramle is a city that has many resources directed to it), you should bring counter evidence. here's another link: http://www.cjaed.org.il/Heb/Index.asp?CategoryID=87&ArticleID;=49 that shows arabs being promoted economically in israel, i'll try to see to it later this week or something - unless someone allready adds it." +Spino was bigger yet not big enough to balance the rest of his disadvantages over T-rex as Giganotosaurus could for example do. Even the suggested pray indicates that (Uranosaurus as the largest propable pray of Spino and Lambeosaurus for T-rex). +" The still continue to create pictures form people's camers, but also the Kodak kiosk for digital cameras. The make printers and cameras too. '•T Naming Who on Earth calls Kodak ""Eastman Kodak""? ""Look! I got my new Eastman kodak camera!"" or ""Look! I got my new Kodak camera!"" '•T " +'. Dannyg3332 20:33, 14 +Because we want examples, not every example. And yes. +" Related controversies The ""Related controversies"" section is outrageously biased. If such a section belongs in this article (which I doubt) then it should also cover ""related controversies"" involving global warming's true believers. If it's necessary to highlight a link between global warming scepticism and a rejection of peer-reviewed studies of passive smoking and of the role of CFCs in depleting the ozone layer, it's equally necessary to highlight a link between global warming activism and a rejection of peer-reviewed studies of GM foods, whaling, selective logging and the eco-advisibility of scuttling the Brent Spar oil platform - all of which controversies found or find Greenpeace (which for some reason is quoted in this section) on the wrong side of the science. The whole section should be deleted, in my view - especially as this article is currently being edited to remove political aspects of the global warming controversy. " +" From a purely WP:LEAD point of view, the article has several sections devoted to cores and the requirement for ferromagnetism is stated prominently. It is a reasonable summary to have the ferromagnetic core requirement in the lead. The argument that not all ferromagnetic materials make good cores is irrelevant to the statement that all cores must be ferromagnetic. This is the logical fallacy of denying the antecedent; all A are B is not invalidated because some B are not A. That some new material for cores might be discovered that is not ferromagnetic is WP:CRYSTAL and also irrelevant, certainly not encyclopaedia worthy. I am not convinced that there are any genuine electromagnet applications of air-cored solenoids. The solenoid in its actuator role has a metal armature which is effectively acting as a core. Spark " +Thanks, Anne and Roger. I would do all that you say! +" Edit request on 6 February 2012 Definition of Islamophobia Literal Definition of Phobia pho·bi·a (fō'bē-ə): A persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangeroushttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Phobia. According to the Organisation of The Islamic Conference: ""Islamophobia signifies the contemporary proliferation of discrimination against Muslims and distortion of Islam and is partly due to the ignorance and lack of understanding of Islam in the West. It would be an unfortunate error in judgment in believing that Islam is linked to terror; that it is intolerant of other religious beliefs, that its values and practices are not democratic; that it favors repression of freedom of expression and undermining human rights.""http://www.oic-oci.org/uploads/file/Islamphobia/Islamophobia_rep_May_23_25_2009.pdf " +Why don't you try working with him instead of repeatedly trying to get him banned which is what you've done since the beginning. Try having some good faith. +Please see the bootom of the page for my unblock request** +" The toes have strong POV odor ) You did very nice edits on Ebionites, but I strongly advise you to create your own page at Ebionite Restoration Movement where you will tread on fewer toes. Just click on the redlinked article and start writing / cut and pasting. You might still have problems with your writing style (I do advise you to read the preceeding links about Wikipedia writing style etc). When you are happy with the Ebionite Restoration Movement article we can link to it from the Ebionite page. Michael C. Price talk Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nazirene""" +AlfonzFred Sorry if I double posted somewhere but I don't see my previous comment and want to be sure to get to you. Whats wrong with my edits to 1986? And why would you call them vandalisim? I'm planning on writing articles about the two indiviuals I listed and wish to add them to the timeline. I don't see how this took away from the article. +REDIRECT Talk:Flavius Probus, Senator +It's a also the name of a famous freelance hooker bar in Bangkok, Thailand. +It is not false to simply state what someone's legal name is, but to use it in a manner that misrepresents their identity or gender, which would certainly be the case here, is and would defame that individual. The title and contents of an article should represent its subject and its subject is no longer, according to sources, a male by the name of Bradley Manning. +Apparently such accusations are considered acceptable, and as I mentioned above: as long as that is the case I don't belong here. Hope you enjoy it more than I do, and that that'll continue as you are a fantastic editor. Good bye. 88.88.166.230 == +Ah, one more thing: is there any reason to doubt this site? http://www.athletix.org/Statistics/wr100men.htm +To start off I didn't day they were bootlegs I said borderline meaning unofficial poor sound quality releases which as I stated there are loads of them with none of them being listed except the 2 I removed and lastly I know that disc is a mixture of studio and live but stating Preaching the Blues'' is entirely live is not needed as it is just basically disc 2 of the box set. +REDIRECT Talk:Silent Descent (EP) +" OR removed from page I removed the following section due to its entirely being original research and speculation. Per User:SteveLoughran's request, here it is. The implementation details of S3 are not documented, but it is possible to infer aspects of it from the behaviour (and pricing) of the service. There is an S3 repository in the US; there is another in Europe. Their locations are not public. From an EC2 server, read access can initially be slow. This could imply that S3 data is not always in the same physical location as all the EC2 servers. Amazon do not bill for data transferred between the US EC2 server farm and the US S3 store, but they do for access between the servers and the European S3 store. While the S3 store and the EC2 servers may be in separate locations, they must be close enough together that cost of transferring data is neglible. Both services are presumably hosted on the same Metropolitan Area Ethernet. Connectivity between the S3 datastores and the rest of the Internet is good. This implies they are close to one of the main Internet exchanges. After the initial slow access, later accesses are fast. This could imply that the data is cached. Write access is tangibly slower than writing to a local hard disk. Amazon guarantee that when the operation has completed, data has been written to disk in multiple locations. Amazon warn that even after data has been written, old values may still be read. This implies that there can be more than one cache of the data, and that every GET request does not trigger a check from the front-end caches to the back-end store. Amazon adjusted their initial pricing from a simple flat rate per GB to one that charges small frequently retrieved items per thousand GET or HEAD operations, rather than purely per byte. There may be a flat cost for every entry (indexing, billing entries) and a per-request cost in CPU-time for every access. These fixed overheads are now billed for. The dynamic per-bucket DNS entries are implemented by having a custom S3 DNS server that returns a hostname for every host under the s3.amazonaws.com subdomain, even if a bucket of that name has never been created: > nslookup made-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com Non-authoritative answer: made-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com canonical name = s3-directional-w.amazonaws.com. s3-directional-w.amazonaws.com canonical name = s3-1-w.amazonaws.com. Name: s3-1-w.amazonaws.com Address: 72.21.211.228 At the identified host, there is a web server that always serves up 404 error pages when a GET request against a nonexistent bucket is issued. > telnet made-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com 80 Trying 72.21.207.212... Connected to s3-1-w.amazonaws.com. Escape character is '^]'. GET / HTTP/1.0 host: made-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found x-amz-request-id: F0F7301EF1873635 x-amz-id-2: 9gT/YmUa7EZXIm9FNv7GGThAre8Kn5CEfXpoJpthwuq54Pm+5RRcThAdBa20XsLj Content-Type: application/xml Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:54:42 GMT Connection: close Server: AmazonS3 NoSuchBucket The specified bucket does not exist F0F7301EF1873635 made-up-name-for-wikipedia 9gT/YmUa7EZXIm9FNv7GGThAre8Kn5CEfXpoJpthwuq54Pm+5RRcThAdBa20XsLj Connection closed by foreign host. Notice how the XML error text is intended for machine interpretation, rather than end users. The RequestId element can be used in support requests, as Amazon log every request, at least for a few days." +Honestly? I'd be tempted to remove those too. Now, there may be exceptions, as there surely are, but in most cases a forum discussion will not meet the criteria for a good external link. It's an interesting debate, to be sure, but for a start, it might look entirely different a year from now. Secondly, there's nothing really provable to say these people are more expert on the matter than, say, my friends over at the Return to Castle Wolfenstein forum. As for the Silver Star text, I'm hoping to find time to look over the article again in detail soon, and that is one of the things I may replace with the simple external link (or at the very least condense). Best regards, (Ţ) (Ç) () +" Soviets Hi, thanks for the note, didn't realize it had been an edit war situation. I'm one of those ""the-film-doesn't-say-it-unless-it-says-it"" guys. I see above you wondered about what the Russians were saying. I've never seen this on the web anywhere so this is original research (xxx means I can't make it out). One of the ladies: Vot, v kotorom chasu xxxx? (Hey, what time does xxxx?) Smyslov: V priblizitel'no dva chasa. (About two o'clock.) One of the ladies: Mozhet byt' poydom v observatoriyu. (Maybe we could go to the observatory.) Elena: xxxx (*I can't figure this out) [Floyd appears. After he leaves ...] Smyslov: Naverno yemu ochen' trudno. (It's probably very difficult for him.) One of the ladies: Po-vidimosti. (Obviously.) Another one of the ladies: Da, ochen' trudno. (Yes, very difficult.) " +sock/meat puppetry You have been reported for suspected sock/meat puppetry. +I corrected the Iraq Health Minister estimate in the infobox. It is 100,000 to 150,000. A more recent article reported on the new numbers from him. It is linked in the full infobox on the article page. Article with updated number: http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2006/11/11/2003335773 +Image copyright problem with Image:Mind_blog_logo-1-.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Mind_blog_logo-1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. +FEEDBACK ON NEW SITE re SAI CONTEST +UnderstandMexico Would you please provide an explanation as to why you reverted the external link to the Baja California page of UnderstandMexico? If you can find a more suitable replacement for investment data, perhaps from Bancomext, Sedeco, Detac or Copreen I welcome you to replace it, but as to my very informed knowledge no such information exists on the Internet I request you restore the link to the Baja California investment guide on UnderstandMexico. +" Another personal attack from you? Now, besides your name-calls/personal attacks (""ass"", ""troll""), you've accused me of writing something ""sexist"", which is untrue, and offensive to me since I am not the sort of person that would not do that to anyone. You need to quit with the personal attacks - you are way out-of-bounds. " +Technocracy, the real thing is very cool. +" I'm not sure what ""low key in the project"" means. Do you mean in the administrative realm? " +To believe that early zoom lens designs of the sixties had and optical quality comparable to today's is ridiculous. This ignores the progress on optical design of the past few decades. Early zoom designs typically consisted of three lens groups (convergent,divergent,convergent); the 2d group was fixed, and the 1st and 3rd groups were mobile. Furthermore, the 1st and 3rd group were rigidly linked, so that a complex and difficult to manufacture non-linear cam-based group distance regulation mechanism wasn't needed. The downside of the rigid linking was that such a design can limit optical aberrations only over a very limited focal length range. The development of sophisticated complex non-linearly driven four-group based designs (focusing, variator, compensator, relay master) is a fairly recent phenomenon that has been enabled by the development of new optical design techniques, computation algorithms, manufacturing — e.g. lower cost aspherical lenses, numerical control machines to manufacture precise non-linear driving cams — and material science — e.g. glasses with anomalous dispersion characteristics. +Not without my lawyer. At quick glance, you seem like an investigator for Wikipedia, official, or self-appointed. I don't want no trouble, man. End of story. +" The Philadelphia lawyers professing great concern for the legality of one link seem to be quite relaxed about this one and the content of another article. Indeed the PSP Homebrew article has a link to a website that prominently features an ad that includes the words ""Tale of Online Pirates"". So clearly there is a great deal of inconsistency - if not outright buffoonery - involved in some of those who act like they own this PSP article. I would urge a more reasoned approach. " +hi kannadiga shame on you You look like a terrible ass now with that false citation, Kannadiga. Where did you say Urdu originate? Africa? Despite all the lies and idiocy you spewed, you and a handful of Kanndadigas think you are a valuable encyclopedic contributor! +- Here's your second source: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/5/prweb10694837.htm and another: http://f1000research.com/articles/2-118/v1 +Image:One thru Nine Step by Step Orthographic Auxillary Projection2.png Do you still have a copy of this image? A bot removed it from Orthographic projection way back in 2006 for some reason. Thanks. +" That is fine with me. AFAICT, the tool silently ignores references it cannot parse, so a simpler alternative would be to list those references along with the ones that resulted in HTTP errors. 50.53.48.227 " +Sockpuppet investigation. [Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Valvehueme] I have reported you for suspected abuse of multiple accounts. +"-bank-boss-misleading-Treasury-minister-approved-Sir-Freds-16m-pension-deal.html Mail Online 27 Feb], Sunday Mirror 1 Mar and Telegraph.co.uk 4 Mar. That sort of description isn't used in Wikipedia articles. So even though Richard Nixon, Ted Haggard, Mark Oaten, Bill Clinton and Neil Hamilton are all called ""disgraced"" in lots of press stories, their articles here describe their scandals but don't use the word ""disgraced"". - " +" Speedy deletion of Kwekwe SC Ground A tag has been placed on Kwekwe SC Ground, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T/C " +" Re: Comics infoboxes... Ah, ok. I have to admit, I was pretty hasty cleaning up the article, so I used the infobox from another article which didn't include the ""image"" parameter. I was wary uploading the image, however, so I had attempted to decrease the size to |200px. And I've mistakened the artist as well... this just goes to show you should never do anything in a rush. My apologies. talk/contribs " +This guy is a fucking tool! LOL +" to pull themselves along the ground.]] into the atmosphere of a planet and observe a long-term result of the Greenhouse Effect. This image shows a habitable planet (top) gradually becoming an inhospitable, volcanic rock (bottom).]] is placed by the UFO to promote a primitive species to sapience.]] Pre-release utility " +Have you two considered bringing in a third party to moderate? +Hi, I finally got around to installing the popup tool. It is quite nice, and wasn't hard to install at all, the instructions seemed so long, but there is really only one step! I shouldn't be such a technophobe. Also, I notice on the bottom of your talk page that someone reverted a Tamil disambig. Says it was inappropriate, but I can't see why. To me, 'Tamil areas' clearly refers to areas occupied by Tamil people, but ... +" I am sorry to say Mr.Tosa was not invited to that championship. So what you are telling is not true. Sensei Shukumine never had any contact with Tosa after Tosa turned his back on him and started his own commercial Karate organization. Please see also Sensei Shukumine's personal message at a training seminar in The Netherlands with Sensei Kanai and Sensei Konno. Please see the pictures on the Genseiryu website: Taido and Genseiryu people united to celebrate 55 years Genseiryu - 40 years Taido and to commemorate Sensei Shukumine. Besides that there are pictures of Sensei Shukumine teaching several Genseiryu Teachers like Genseiryu Head Instructor Sensei Kanai in Genseiryu Head dojo situated in Ito Japan in 1996. 212.127.137.2 19:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) Were you at the championship or something? So, if Mr. Tosa never had any contact with Mr. Shukumine after 1962, then please explain these picturse of Mr. Tosa and Mr. Shukumine together on the Brazilian Genseiryu website . Zzaroc 22:01, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) I am sorry I didn't say Sensei Shukumine had any contact after 1962. I said he didn't had any contact after Sensei Tosa turned his back to Sensei Shukumine. This was after Sensei Shukumine wrote the preface for sensei Tosa's book about Genseiryu Butokukai. And yes I was present at the championship in Okinawa amongst other Genseiryu practitioners from Spain, Denmark, Holland, and Japan. I will try to give also a link with pictures of that event. I need a little time for that I am not an Internet black belt sorry for that. 212.127.137.2 22:53, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) You don't have to be a black belt, when your good, by the way. But take your time, I am patient. But I was wondering. Mr. Tosa published his book in 1984, but there still a picture of him together with Mr. Shukumine in 1985 (I mean those pictures on the Brazilian site). Then there are still a few questionmarks. But by the way, did you know that Mr. Tosa received several letters all over the world, just after Mr. Shukumine died? Those letters were asked for permission if some dojo's could join the organization of Mr. Tosa. Mr. Tosa denied these people to join his organization. There was one person who send such a letter to Mr. Tosa from Holland, and you may guess who. And I have got also another question. Mr. Seiken Shukumine past away to an hart attack. But when did he started to get ill? Zzaroc 23:59, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) No a black belt is not needed to have a certain skill. But in most occasion it shows an amount of training effort,time. And as you probably know training effort makes you become more skillfull. I don't know when Mr. Tosa turned his back to sensei Shukumine so maybe my remark that they didn't had any contact shouldn't be done by me because I am not aware of that specific date. So I apologize for that. But I heard this occured in the mid till end '80s. No, I didn't know that Mr. Tosa received several letters from all over the world. I know he claimed to get a letter from Holland. I know he received one which was delivered by someone from Denmark. But I know that the letter was completely different from what is claimed by Mr. Tosa. That is also easy to believe if you are member of a Genseiryu organization in Ito which was directly connected to sensei Shukumine where Sensei Shukumine still gave, in very few occasions, lectures about Genseiryu (pictures are on the way (few days necessary)). So you can imagine you don't beg for acknowledgement by Mr. Tosa who only wants you to train his way, which is very near to Shotokan with the basic kata of Shotokan. This dojo in Holland is not interested in any connection with Mr. Tosa. For what reason, if you want to train Genseiryu the same way as sensei Shukumine taught his students? The Head Instructor of this organization is now Sensei Kanai one of the first students of Sensei Shukumine. In Sensei Shukumine's book ""Shin Karatedo Kyohan"" there are several pictures of teachers who are still in this group. I met them during the celebrating anniversary of Taido and Genseiryu beginning of this year (Jan. 2005). Many nice teachers who still respect Sensei Shukumine, as should be in the relationship with teacher and student. I was never involved with the sickness of Sensei Shukumine and I don't like to talk about his sickness. I met Mr. Shukumine one time and talked a little bit with him. In Okinawa I only met him from a distance. So I am sorry I can't anwer this question for I didn't have such a close relationship with Sensei Shukumine. 212.127.137.2 06:48, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) I'm not in +Yes, I get attacked by the vocal minority wherever I go. +Guru's death Nothing about the Guru death controversy? Some section about that issue should be added. +SamEV I don't know what you are trying to do. Don't be reverting this article like it is yours. You have to explain your reverts. I can revert all of your edits back with no reason. Also, don't be including all white people pictures when hispanics are mostly brown. YOU HAVE TO DISCUSS and go by consensus. When more 2+ people disagree with you, you lose!!!24.9.96.166 +—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) 17:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC) +" It is amazing to see the extent to which the Arabs such as Nableezy and other anti-Semites will try to deny Jews' right to this city. It is not illegal for Jews to return to their historic city of Hebron and try to take it back from Arab colonialists and occupiers. Everyone except brainwashed ignoramuses know that Hebron was an Israelite/Jewish city for centuries long before the so-called ""Palestinian"" Arabs invaded in the sixth century. The Palestinian Arabs are illegal settlers, not the Jews. " +who are you to decide whether an edit i made is constructive or not? free free to lick my asshole, douchebag. +" It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Overall: Pass/Fail: This article seems to have improved from its first review significantly. Most problems are resolved, such as the sub-par prose, which is now very well readable. Some comments on the issues raised in the first review: the period dealt with spans approximately mid-2013 to September 2014. This is an indication it may not meet criterion 3a. - As far as I can see, there is not a lot more to say about this young lady so far. While taking in interest in people who are famous because of their parents and because of who they date eludes me, it is no reason to fail criterion 3a. Daily Mail may not be a reliable source - There are a couple of references here that could be argued do not come from what is usually considered reliable. However, it is accepted in ""tabloid"" topics to include ""tabloid"" sources. Otherwise, Wikipedia would only consist of articles on people The Guardian writes about. Yawn! However, these things should be adressed: Nowhere does it actually state that Wright and Penn are famous actors. That is however necessary, because otherwise one might easily ask why this person deserves a Wikipedia article in the first place. The archive links in the references are inconsistent. The style you should use is the one in reference #1 (Link to original page, publiser, archived from and then ""the original"" as the link). This can easily be achieved by using the cite web template. However the first reference is not a good example alltogether, since it makes no sense that the page is from July 28, 2014 and it is stated that it was retrieved on July 19th. Please look into this. You might wanna find a better source for the Elvis and Nixon film. Maybe this one even though it is certainly not perfect as well. That's about it. I give the nominator(s) the usual seven days to adress the issues. Until then, it is placed on hold. " +He is married to Mrs.Wanda Goldberg(Ferraton) i dont think we need to really state anything about his relationship status +"Kurt and Dave get it on?== Groaning Kurt released his cock. For the past week he hadn't been able to get off. He tried a cocktail of drugs and a cocktail of whores. Nothing was doing it for him. Masturbating in the shower wasn't even working. Oh he was getting hard all right, he just couldn't fucking cum. And it was driving him nuts. To top it off, he didn't know why he couldn't cum. The girls had been either hot enough or slutty enough. Even the couple of guys he brought home had been decent. Despite that, he couldn't fucking cum. And a week of that was enough to make anyone more pissy than normal. Which meant band practice was unlikely to be much fun for anyone. That was made abundantly clear the moment Kurt stepped into the rehearsal studio. His eyes flicked from Krist to Dave and he came to a sudden stop. Dave was sitting on a couch, a pretty girl in his lap giggling. It was like he was taunting Kurt. And he would have nothing of that. Stalking over to the drummer and the floozie, Kurt pulled her forcibly out of his lap. The girl squealed and Dave growled, but Kurt paid no attention, forcing the girl out of the studio. After slamming the door he headed back over to Dave. Without a word he pulled the drummer to him and kissed him possessively. Dave shoved Kurt away, ""What part of no don't you fucking understand!?"" Krist's eyes widened and he took a step forward, ""Guys, I think—"" Kurt sent him a silent glare, silencing and stopping him. ""I don't want you, Kurt. I don't even fucking like you right now,"" Dave growled. ""In fact, I fucking quit! I don't have to put up with this shit. You're fucking insane. You need some other crackwhore to take my place. I'm not it."" Sidestepping the singer, Dave headed towards the door. He barely made three steps before Kurt grabbed him again. This time his back was pulled to Kurt's front. He could clearly feel the singer's erection pressing into his ass. He wasn't going to be anyone's bitch. ""I'm just gonna... go,"" Krist muttered before slipping out of the room quickly. ""You're fucking mine, Dave,"" Kurt declared, licking Dave's neck. ""Always."" For as small as he was, Kurt had more strength than Dave expected. With considerably less effort than he would have figured, the singer forced the drummer down to the floor. Dave wiggled and tried to crawl away, but all that resulted was in Kurt pulling the drummer's pants off. Laying down on top of Dave while he worked his own pants off, Kurt hissed in his ear, ""You're mine. You hear me? Fucking mine."" ""Stop! Kurt, stop!"" Dave struggled. With Kurt's weight on him, the drummer had very little maneuverability. He was completely trapped. But that didn't mean he stopped trying to get away. While wholly his struggling was probably a good thing, it wasn't really helping. If anything it was turning Kurt on more. Not having the patience to remove Dave's boxers, Kurt reached down and tore the back seam, exposing the drummer's ass. He didn't even pause to warn Dave. His hands spread Dave's cheeks, spit down his crack to provide some lubrication, and quickly pushed his cock in. Dave screamed, wiggling once more to get away. With Kurt's hands holding onto his hips, he had no chance to go anywhere, at least not until the singer was done. Dave's screams faded into sobs. That alone drove Kurt further, faster. He loved everything about it. The way Dave's ass squeezed his cock better than anyone else's had before. He was a perfect glove, a perfect fit. Before too long a week's worth of unreleased cum spurted from Kurt's cock. Slowly he pulled out, not really caring about the mixture of blood and semen leaking from Dave's ass. Grinning to himself he refastened his pants. He glanced at Dave, a feeling of superiority infusing him. He totally owned Dave now. Does anyone have any basis for this rumour? I would love to put it on the main page. Um... No. Just no. Did you pull that out of some dirty sex novel or what? Talk Reverted undo; suspected vandalism ==" +copyright contributer investation is dragging on forever Do you have time to get back to the old investigations like mine here- Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Дунгане because i think this long delay is going to keep piling up for years at this rate. No one seems to be trying to deal with the old investigations like mine, which is just sitting around. +Thanks for your reversions But it is not nonsense. I need further feedback from Wikipedia administrators. Do you have much HFCS yourself? +Please unblock my account +, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Well comrade. Look at this way. Fight Dem Back is very mush controlled by bias communists. They must be stop from posting crap and lies on Fight Dem Back. Plus Wikipedia has become a dictatorship of the idiots. The Wikipedia dictatorship must be ended and democracy re-started. Pleas restor the deletion thing on FDB article. 07:58 +Which one of us is having trouble with Wiki is not a Battlefield? +" I've sanitised Bushell's language and deleted the earlier quote which was FAR more offensive (Bushell claimed he wouldn't like to ""fuck her"".) How can it be concluded this language is acceptable but calling Trott a ""dumpling"" isn't? This smacks of hypocrisy and an obvious anti-bias to ""new"" editors on EastEnders pages. " +No Im sorry, the BB is not part of the scouts, because it is older than the scouts and therefore should have its own WikiProgect for the Brigades as it is known to members of it. +"Notice: If you are here because I speedy deleted your article, please make sure you link to the article in question (even if it is a red link). I sometimes delete hundereds of articles a day and unless you tell me what you are talking about and make it easy for me to find it, it is unlikley I will address your concerns. Thanks! lk02 Chris Kreider " +92L.INVEST Best status from NRL: 45kts 995 mb 92L.INVEST first appeared 2009-06-01, 2245z @ 41.0ºN 24.0ºW. NHC TWO 2009-06-02, 0000z // 0600z // 1200z // 1800z RSMC AOI NHC TWO 2009-06-06, 1800z 2009-06-07, 0000z // 0600z // 1200z // 1800z 2009-06-08, 0000z // 0600z +he stalking the page White Latin Americans, the patterns are the same, he observed who edited +Sorry, I stand corrected, thanks. +" Population of 67 millions ? 67 lak is 67 * 100,000. which is 6.7 million. I changed to have the metro population again. If you are going to consider ""greater Hyderabad"", you had to consider greater Los Angeles ... which might include Los Angeles ...even Seattle, depending on definitions. Look at a map of India. The entire subcontinent could be considered one city if you require a defined barren zone of X km between cities. Metro probably includes the 100th town after the edge of the city anyway." +You are replacing the view of the various RSs as whether it is relevant with your POV. The way wikipedia works, that is not appropriate. Your view that Time is wrong to treat it as relevant for example, and that the statement reported by NPR of the former mayor of his ancestral home is his POV and ridiculous, and what a cousins of the subject said is untrue and dumb misses the point. It is quite fine for the people quoted to make statements that (if you were correct in your assertion) reflect their POV, and are ridiculous, and are dumb. What is not OK is for you to introduce your POV by deleting such statements from RSs. That is why, quite properly, the other editor termed your deletions disruptive. +why do you care about a fake search engine, poopyhead jerk? +NOMINATION I am officially nominating TenPoundOtter for a Hug. We all love you. +About 700 euros, if you buy it from a greek mathematician-turned-hacker-turned-spy. See story: http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL2568324820080125 http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5486068.html +Done, the article you uploaded read too much like an advertisement, implied that the band was still active, and just had really bad formatting. Upon reading further into the band I'm still unsure that they might meet WP:MUSIC criteria for inclusion. The article no longer qualifies for speedy deletion, however it could still be deleted through other methods such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. Anyways, I hope you look at the changes I made to the article and learn from them. I would also highly recommend that you read WP:PEACOCK, WP:NPOV, and WP:MOS. +" Gatherer Code There is another internal to WOTC code for each set. The code is used in ""Gatherer"" when an expansion set is chosen in the advanced search. Sometimes these codes match up to the internal code that is already here but not always. For example the code for ""Apocalypse"" is APC but for Gatherer it is AP. Would it be possible to put these codes in the table along side the other code?" +Agreed! My knowledge of English is less than yours. In this discussion I also made mistakes due to the inability to express and understand, as needed. Therefore, your suggestion for more attention when we choice our words is acceptable for me. If, however, it happened to make some lapse, please give me some credit of trust - I don't want to insult anybody.Regards, +Of course the neutral closer has to recognize the stronger arguments on one side, if they exist, as they did in the case of Yogurt (as proven by the peace and stability since the move), to apply the rule. Such recognition requires the ability to envision that the proposed move is made and to evaluate the arguments in that context. I'm unsure how many closers are capable of doing this. 2C +The fact is you're losing the argument. Tell me if Hindi, Hindu or Hindustan appears in any classical age 'Hindu' literature and before the coming of Muslims and development of later Islamic-inspired Indian languages, cuisine, culture etc. Even you are hiding behind a Muslim name. Game, set and match. {[User: Moarrikh]} 12 May 2010 +I replied on your talk page. +Let's make the change: The War Logs → Afghan War Logs 192.43.227.18 +10:07 News Conference From police spokesperson: 14 dead, updated 17 wounded, conditions unknown. SUV chased. 27-28 officers in gun battle at SUV. 2 suspects deceased in/at SUV. Sieed Furuk (spelling). (missed age, but stated) US born. Tashfeen Malik, 28, female. Unknown what her nationality or origin is at this time. Married or engaged, (or girl/boyfriend) not clear yet. Christmas party or gathering he was part of event, attended same event last year. He is an environmental specialist in Public Health department. He was at party, left angry. Police were following up when they encountered him near townhome. No info on criminal records. Info was there were upward of three shooters. Now comfortable two shooters deceased. Not 3 shooters. Scenes - Inland, townhome was A residence for him, his office secured, street shootout scene. There were explosive devices at scenes, just cleared, allowing for processing of scenes to start. Pipe bomb like device, not specific info yet. Not ruled out terrorism. Motive unclear. Understand people concerned about further threats. Sheriffs department, state and One officer wounded, resting in hospital, non-life threatening injuries. (gunshoot according to sources). +Giant Cunt== She is not liberal but in fact a giant cunt. == +What in the fuck......will someone please revert this O.o +I have just seen that the link did not work, so I agree with you removing it. As for Encyclopedic writing style - How would you have written it ? Thanks +Which would be a perfectly true thing to say about Howard Dean, and probably belongs in an article about the association between mainstream Democrats and the Communist movement, if there is one. If there's not, no one's stopping you from creating one. Donohue's willingness to find offense towards Catholicism at the slightest thing (a statue of Jesus made of chocolate, created by a Catholic sculptor, as a gift to the Church, is somehow offensive because of some Bible passage I must have missed about chocolate being created by the Devil) while himself constantly using terms of clear derision towards homosexuals, Jews, and Asians is a very important point, as Donohue's hypocrisy and selective outrage direclty relates to WHY the Catholic League is considered important. The purpose of the article should be directed towards answering the question of what the Catholic League means in American politics. That Donohue cares more about calling Democrats atheist anal sex fiends, so much that he would ally with open racists and actual anti-Catholics to do so, than he does about promoting what many others consider to be mainstream Catholic values is very relevant to why Donohue is important and worthy of an article here. +hi you dont know me and i bet you dont care right but i am ten brother to 6 other sissters and brothers god knows how many cusins i have but i have agood life, i hope you do to thats all i have to say so have good day and check me out latter. thanks.michael landsbaum. +Criticism is supposed to be critical, that doesn't mean it's biased. The critique is decently sourced, although some of the sources cannot be linked to. What exactly is the problem you see with it? You don't agree with it, or...? +It is the truth, though. Ask Bongwarrior and he will tell you that it is so. He is to shy to write it on his talk page, though. 119.245.91.247 +" If you do a search for ""everything"" with the name Mardyks, you will find those facts and also may notice how INTENT some of the eds and ads at Wiki are at ELIMINATING and BLOCKING all my contributions, hence my blog titled ""Censored From Wikipedia."" Do your homework before acting like another wikidiki, ok?" +sorry, still can't figure out Wike editing very well: could you email me on sander777777@hotmail.com ? because I found a couple of historical articles with links that support that San Marino was not neutral in World war 2. I changed that a couple of times on wikipedia, but every time it was changed back, i think wthout good support. best regards, Sander +This article obviously needs work but this is better than nothing for the time being. I don't know why the page was deleted earlier. Consider this bit a weak stub and improve upon it if you'd like. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ferdinand Magellan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. talk " +also. Better, not beter +" Good for you! Give yourself a pat on the back and proclaim ""yay me! I'm so smart! I can do it!"" I'm glad to see such constructive work on your behalf. Always nice to see editors developing a sense of self-fulfillment from their work. This sentence will be inappropriately placed, but I feel that it is necessary; you need to learn to read carefully before editing and you should try to control your tendency towards behaviours that most would label as idiotic. No offense. Just trying to offer constructive advice for your benefit and for the sake of other editors that will have to deal with you. " +http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Michael_Laudahn&redirect;=no 'You apparently did not learn from being warned': I'm twenty years older than you and have probably seen a bit more in my life than you have. Cf http://worldimprover.net/EN/en8.html . What do you think someone like you can teach me? Have a look at your own self-desciption, in case you've forgotten. It is obvious to me that your reaction is gravely exaggerated, thereby showing your bias. You did not at all mention the kind of 'automatic re-establishing of the status quo ante mechanism' of the other guy upon my editing attempt, an apparently totally brainless procedure worthy of a hotline roboter. Suggestion: Try to find out what your bias is owed to, kid. Apart from that, I don't care what someone like you chooses to do or not to do. +Actually, Hectorian is absolutely right. 87.221.4.184 +as embodied by the IPCC report. This is a perfect example of the type of OR that is rampant in the article +. I hate your freakin guts +RESPONSE TO: SLED the sled is this thing on the computer as its name suggest's its comes out like a sled and you put the disk on it +Why do you keep removing links from the BB 2006? Hi, i keep trying to add a link under dino's name but you keep removing it. Why? The website has a large collection of dino delic photos. +Very useful suggestion. It will be a welcome change to actually discuss it with some neutral folks. Thank you. ) +Any news? Hello there! Any news from the board of directors? Oops, sorry about that! I meant the experts you refered to on handling the subject of copyright rules and regulations! Tomorrow is the day when my images will be deleted from Wikipedia, so what will happen next? I'm sure that I would at least be able to use my own paintings with my written article, since there is no reason for me to prohibit myself from using these pictures. But if we get no instructions whatsoever of how to go about things, I see no other option than to abort any inclusion of images with the article and just make it a plain, written one based on the notes which I have delivered so far. Or what is your outlook on this? +Yes. I do believe it should not be reverted. It does not fit wikipedia standards it is incorrect and badly written. I am looking forward to your response and hoping you agree. +Hi, the edit I made is definitely right. I know there are posts online that say her birthday is September 3rd, but it's definitely October. You can see here, here, here, here and on her twitter. The 103 stands for October 3rd. 92.239.222.21 +" A-class or not I've quick-failed an A-class review of the Biography project, because there are two fair use images without fair use rationales, and entire sections are without references. As this is sufficient to quick-fail a GA review, it must quick-fail an A-class review as well. B-class is the highest it can get for now. rab " +Someday, it'll be the United Republic of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. +You are clearly a sock puppet Dance for the Puppet master Dance Dance +This page was proposed for semi-protection against vandalism by a newly-registred socks by the blocked . +ps- there about 40 more changes I want to make, and I want to go slow to give us time to go for consenus on what I have already done. +Suggested headings for the article == I quite like the structure used on the Stevenson page separating biographical details from research interests. Perhaps the latter could be subsumed under a Career heading which has Education, Early Career, Research under that. Thoughts? Cheers, == +" Question about spelling In Conspiracy theories: ""the speed of the DNA results has lead to..."". The correct spelling in UK English is ""led"". Is ""lead"" correct in American English? " +Robinson and Benedict Perhaps something from the discussion above could be transferred to the Interfaith page, where it may be more relevant. +OPPOSEleave it as it is. +" There is no such word in Latin. Are you thinking of Latin artus ""joint, sinew, limbs""? Regardless, it is highly unlikely that this is the source of the Welsh name Arthur. ~~~~ " +" I agree. The entire section titled ""Bridging the Second and Third Reichs in German South West Africa"" looks like WP:OR. Although I'm sure some authors have touched on the subject, our article gives it undue space. In addition, lots of items in the table look like pure speculation. Descriptions such as ""Heinrich ""worked"" in German Southwest Africa, and Hermann was a ""well known member"" of the NSDAP""; this guy ""originated the slogan Lebensraum while in GSWA in 1910, a sympathizer who influenced the NSDAP since 1923""; or even ""member NSDAP in 1933, founder of German East Africa"" (this article is not about German East Africa). Enumerating every single person who visited GSWA and later had some role in WWII does not seem especially remarkable or particularly informative and the entire section could be reduced to a paragraph or two summarizing the arguments for the link that some authors have provided. Remember, this article is about German South-West Africa - i.e. narrower in scope than German colonialism and wider than the Herero and Namaqua Genocide. (''talk) " +Support Just because English typesetters usually don't have access to ń doesn't mean we have to follow suit. (･∀･) June 29, 2005 16:42 (UTC) +Raymond arritt This is not an accident Some of the sections/articles on Kambojas, as being edited and altered by Debachmann, are getting utterly confusing and more messier, and, I'm afraid, may lead to erroneous conclusions by the readers. As he has started editing/altering them en mass, either he should improve the articles by editing them suitably so as to keep them clear, logical and readable and at the same time, also maintain/keep intact their integrity and factuality (let's us if he can do it), or else, I will have no alternative except to revert them back to their original versions. For example, the article Language and ethnicity of Kambojas, in its current form which he has edited, is utterly terrible. I don't think he and other editors on kamboj articles of his kind are quite familiar with the Kamboj history, so as to render them a justice. Further, please make a note that, none of the information, in any of articles on the Kambojas, is a original-research as Mr Debachmann continues to allege. All the Kamboj information is in the books and only he and other people of his ilk may not be aware of it. I have sent this note to him not with any intention to enter into a futile argument with him, but simply to let him know that all the information on the Kambojas..ancient/mediaval or modern, as inserted in any Kamboj related article here, is well-documented and has been taken from reliable references/sources from notable scholars. Cheers and have a nice day. +the Article has serious Errors! Deeply dissapointed the way facts have been presented here, and elsewhere in the wikipedia relating to the topic of Kashmir. Am not saying it is biased peice of work, but am saying it completly ignores some important facts. am talking specifically about the events that unfolded in 1947. If someone has access to this book already mentioned in the wikipedia: Freedom at Midnight, the book is by an Englishmen, and hence has an element of neutrality. The section pertaining to Kashmir needs to be rewritten, and copied elsewhere where required. Please someone look into the issue! Else I will surely take time out to rewrite the mentioned section. +Requested move Takajin → – Alike case to Ichiro Suzuki, whose WP article is named 'Ichiro Suzuki' and not simply 'Ichiro', despite his North American common name. +You are wrong Matisse, just check the history. +"} Please log in before voting. Your anonymous vote arouses suspicion, particularly because you imply that this is the ""God knows how many time"" you've made this point, yet your IP address shows only 2 previous contributions to Wikipedia. - " +on a non-reliable source +section from Collapse of the World Trade Center +Good observations. I didn't use the word Wallachian because that word is often associated with Wallachians from Muntenia, but you can make the changes, if you would like. +" Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Cheers, ) Dlohcierekim " +" Invitation to join WikiProject Albemarle County Hello! WikiProject Albemarle County, an outreach effort supporting development of Albemarle County and surrounding area related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been started. As a user who has shown an interest in related topics I wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the project. If you are interested please visit our page (currently under construction) and add the user badge to your talk page. Thank you!!!- " +Why are meteoroligists automatically excluded?67.141.235.203 +http://www.doi.gov/news/07_News_Releases/070208.html regarding the transfer of the lighthouse to the Society. +well terrilja , thats what u get , if you erase someones edit without proper reason , just because you have power to do so. I knoe you, terrilja , rschen and your admin friends are racist fellows who think that only british view is the correct view Well, if you still think that way , why dont you search the term on google and find it yourself that I am right 72.33.44.250 you wont do it because this will make you go back on your actions ,, you racist 72.33.44.250 +He's a repeat offender. When he changed Islamofascism to POV rant some users spent a lot of time explicitly telling him what is wrong with his submissions but he won't (or perhaps) can't moderate even in the slightest. And he whines like a baby. Ban. 00:15, 18 Aug 2003 (UTC) +HOPE YOUR HEAD GETS CUT OFF AND SOMEONE WIPS THERE ASS WITH IT AND THEN STABS YOU IN YOUR HEART +OK, i fixed it, removed a bunch of stuff such as from unreliable sources blogs and web sites which don't bother to name their sources, they could just be writing anything any which way they like. And provided refs for the St Patrick's one (borderline ref, if you ask me). Removed the Copyright violation tag, now that it is perhaps acceptable. Man you'd done a sloppy job, throwing crappy URLs left and right, some not even matching the statements they were supposed to back up. No thanks. +Well, you pretty much backed up what I was saying. Thanks! — 19:31, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC) +" What the fuck?!?! ""Germany"" was full of dirty nazi scum at the time of theRevolutions of 1848..... Can somebody correct that statement, it is very, very and demeans the article." +HOCKEY STICK UP YOUR ASS HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE THE AUTHOR OF THE ERIC GOERTZ ARTICLE OF WANTING WORLDWIDE FAME? Fucking asshole. I wish there was still a hockey strike you FUCKHEAD. Go ahead try to get my shit deleted wikipedia is just a bunch of old fucks trying to act scholarly about matters they know nothing about, how the fuck would you have heard this story any other way except by me using wikipedia? That's what I thought. I hope you don't get palsy sitting on your computer salivating over women's NHL photos all day. Go ahead and make my day! +Maybe people are not prepared to accept the whitewash that the wiki admins and OTRS people are trying to impose. Why not have a discussion about what exactly is allowed on the page? When a subject is quite happy to give interviews to the national press discussing their life for publicity they can't then demand complete privacy. (82.132.238.244 ) +" Ahh socks, that changes my whole reasoning for the protection. Marked down semi. Let me know if they come back, file a SPI and just note it here, and I will nuke them and get them out of your way. [[User_Talk:DeltaQuad| (t) ]] (e) " +XB Machine Could you take a look at the new version of the article? +" Hear hear! It reminded me of Joey trying to sound I-talian. 76 " +" Lead section Should we not mention in the lead section after nuclear prog that He claims that Iran is not interested in developing a nuclear weapon and that he says Iran has an ""inalienable right"" to produce nuclear fuel? Thanks " +(UTC) Things are not this simple. There is much dispute over wheather the US succesfully installed a democracy, since the new government is becoming more and more authoritarian, candidates were banned from recent elections, there have been fraud claims during all 3 elections and many human rights violations have taken place. Also Iraq's status as a US ally (leave alone major US ally) is questionable, due to the strong ties to Iran of many leading Shi'a and Kurdish figures and the growth increasing influence of Muqtada al-Sadr's political party. Also the insurgency is far from quelled, although it's not as deadly as it was around 2006-2007, with at least 4,000 civilians, 900 security forces killed this year it is still one of the most deadly insurgencies on earth. 19:26, 4 January 2011 +" Your GA nomination of Katherine Ritvo The article Katherine Ritvo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Katherine Ritvo for comments about the article. Well done!  Boomer! " +Surely user 59.92.173.134 is a sock puppet As is standard practice with certain users and their preferred admins, the old story is being repeated and I hope it is noticed by neutral administrators who can take both corrective action as well as let contributors like me know if at all anything has been done wrongly or in error otherwise. The above user has once again like a trained puppet in the hands of his masters, chosen to parrot words passing comments on my contributions rather than discussing the content. Surely his observations 1(a) no professional standard might be to an extent valid in that I am not a trained in editing in placing the references in article, but certainly I cannot be faulted for getting and sourcing the right references and that too utterly reputable and hence verifiable, completely genuine and original references - I hope original referencing is not dubbed as Original Research, which I do know is not permitted in wikipedia. Sourcing and repeating the findings of epigraphists, archaeologists of national and international repute (the epigraphists include some international ones too) is somehow being considered wrong and instead of directly discussing the subject (I have of course, placed huge material on this very talk page but that has not been touched at all - but the same source whatsindia.com or K.A.Nilakanta Sastri has been sourced and used in other pages, but different yardstick is being followed by admins with regard to the page on the Cholas. The above user's comment on the standard 1(c) and 2(c)is completely false and is an utter lie for the sources are available both in print and on the web for all to see. Certainly only a blind person could not see and place the sources referred and quoted. I am sure neutral admins will see and intervene in the right manner. +" No problem - you may want to drop those unblock requests off your talk page. They show up on a task list for admins. (talk) " +Forgive me, Freddie! +labour hire is pimping +It was signed Moron - what part of that didn't you understand... +1:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC) +" The VG Barnstar This is a collective barnstar to everyone (Frodet, Miremare, JediLofy, Raphie and myself) who helped fill out the sortable List of ZX Spectrum games. It took over a year, on and off, but it's more or less done! Thanks " +Watch lists may be used to watch vandalism and break of policies. Vandalizing a user page and making personal attacks like Bormalagurski (and you, by restoring his comments) are doing is such vandalism. ( ) +" No. There is no need to add a ""short version"" to the intro. The intro, which is 4 paragraphs should summarize the article. (talk) " +" No, YOU ""shut up already"". The only ""consensus"" here is the one of your gang which has hijacked this article to whitewash police actions blocking anyone who counters this disgusting propaganda. Are you guys getting paid by some police department to this? If I find out you have, I'll make sure all of you are banned from wikipedia forever. 69.228.251.134 " +Archive page 8: October 2008 +Just the more notable conspiracy theorists. Those two are the more relevant (if you can call them that) in the media during our current time. I was about to add the Ron Paul campaign but I keep KISS in mind. +" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 69.42.4.31). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. When you edit pages: Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. " +Hi. I will work through an example for you. In most Western economies, money borrowed to invest is tax deductible. In other words, you are only taxed on net profits associated with a business or investment venture such as a 'carry trade' in assets, cash, bonds, or commodities. So let's say the hypothetical 'carry trader', as typically depicted in the financial media, is borrowing Yen at 0%, and investing in US treasuries or overnight repos at 5.25%. Sounds like a profitable trade, right? Read on. Now, consider that said trader pays a marginal income tax rate of 40%. And consider that Japan has been in deflation for the past number of years, at deflationary rate of -1%. In the same time period, US inflation has been running at roughly 2.5%. The 'real' cost after-tax cost of Yen = nominal after-tax cost - rate of inflation. The 'real' return on USD assets = nominal after-tax returns - rate of inflation. So, for the Yen borrowing, the calculation is 0% * (1-40%) = 0% - (-1%) = 1% And for the USD investment = 5.25% (1-40%) = 3.15% - 2.5% = 0.65% So the real rate of return on USD investment is 0.65%, while the real cost of Yen borrowing is 1%. Since the real cost of Yen borrowing exceeds the real return on USD investment, a so-called 'carry trade' should not have an expectation of profit. Hedge funds and other institutional players are usually intelligent enough not to engage in activities that do not have expectations of profit. Therefore, it can be argued that all the talk in the financial 'media' or even in the 'Economist' about a so-called profitable 'carry trade' is complete nonsense. It is true that there might be some speculators who have placed (and done well with) bets against the Yen in recent years since the bubble burst in the 90s, but to confuse such with a profitable 'carry trade' defies logic. +Actually, the English translation is of the version from 2002; article 157., paragraphs (2) and (3) were ammended in 2004 (as seen in the Bulgarian version, which is from 2005) and the age of consent is now 14 for both homosexual and heterosexual sex. If you don't know Bulgarian, just look at the numbers in the Bulgarian version; it's 14, and you can also see there it was last ammended in 2004. Also, Paragraph (4) was removed. 87.126.9.205 Ah thank you, that's something else we need to make note of. So if I just change the aove to read 14 in both cases would that still be correct or were there more changes to the Code? +YOU DUMB ASS!! Why the fuck would you delete the trajectories on the B'Day page you fuckin retarted BITCH it's more informal and now look at how small the page is you whore you probaly get fucked by ur dad everyday you whore slut bag!! +Thank you, Mendaliv. +All the material you have desperately been trying to remove has been there before anything between you and me came up, and was inserted via legitimate and honest editing work. Respect the work of other editors and stop trolling the entry. +Hey guys. That's terrible bad news. Walt Disney Animation Studios development in Mickey Mouse and King of the Elves. How to get films? Go to Disney Fanon Wiki: Untitled Crash Bandicoot film and The Rescuers Continental Drift. I never give up. +Victor Williams Then leave Victor Williams on the list of famous tall men list and I won't blank your page anymore!!! +I have learnt my lesson. +Whatever Fucking block me then you punk ass bitch! I don't give a flying fuck. You obviously just go around making sure that random ass wiki pages are safe for everyone and don't have complete information. If you blcok me, I will continue to send you these messages and when i am unblocked, the fires from hell will be unleashed upon wikipedia. you want to see some vandalism? just as i did with Islam, Christianity and miracle whip in the past, i will do to anything i see with your fucking faggot ass signature on it. seriously? do you have to be such a whinny, cock sucking dickhead? can you even respond to these? it doesn't seem like it. you just put all this horseshit on here and think that your place of authority on wikipedia makes you a big person? you're probably that kid that people thought would kill everyone in high school. really? i hope you get blocked from wiki edits. fuck you to death. +and interviews published in Times of India and Malayalam Manorama online and links are updated there. So kindly note that and avoid deletion +" Where did the motto that is listed last originate? I went to parochial schools and took Latin - but I've never seen this before!! I am very curious about it. I have never seen it with all the history I have read. What is this "" New order of the ages"" about? What is your source??74.222.198.71 ( ""Novus ordo seclorum"" (Latin) ""New order of the ages""" +Marion van de Wetering First, you don't use the English language at anywhere near a native-speaker's level, so I suggest your user box is misleading. Secondly, you grasp of North American culture appears to me to be quite limited, so I suggest you stick to issues and ideas in your own small country. +What you are doing is vandalism. You have been checked on it before, i see. You should ask for citations, instead of reverting. There is much this fat little queer does not know. +Removed due to censorshhip +Thanks for proving my point, you've obviously never had sex with a redhead D ( ) +AHAHHAHAHA!!! That (List of fruits that cannot legally be carried on certain public transport systems) is the single greatest article I've ever seen on Wikipedia. I love it. TERRIFIC!!! +" Furthermore, the ""douglashenshaw.com"" so-called ""reference site"" is just a non-official fansite. So what? It had more reference data than any other site. Contains what could arguably described as copyrighted material without permission from the producers Such as? " +" Endhiran Hello. Are you a reviewer ?. I do not know how you received it. Please for god sake stay away from Endhiran article. You are creating serious abruptive actions here which is totally un-acceptable. Go through this link, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/EndhiranBiggest-hit-in-the-history-of-Indian-cinema/697154 http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6908271-endhiran-the-robot-box-office-collection-or-endhiran-collection http://ratevin.com/story.php?title=robot-box-office-collection-endhiran-box-office-collection-robot-collection —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Read it fully. I have 0% trust/belief on links you provide if you are not accepting this. You have a mind right ?. Please think and act. You are spoiling the article. Stay away !!! Ungal Vettu Pillai —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) " +" I am not an expert in this, but all I know is that every night when my AVG Anti-Virus software runs, in the morning it shows two cookies from webtrends: (1) ""m.webtrends[2].txt"" and (2) ""m.webtrends[2].txt:m.webtrends[2].txt.b4xxxxxx"". Webtrends has put something on my computer and AVG Anti-Virus says it is an ""infection"" and a ""potentially dangerous object"". I visit sites like The New York Times et al, and I know they put cookies on my computer, but AVG Anti-Virus doesn't consider them to be ""infections"" or ""potentially dangerous objects"", so something must be up. Can you explain why AVG Anti-Virus points out the Webtrends cookies? Thanks in advance." +" To 87.202.*.* Anon, please please please use edit summaries and use this talk page if you want to insist on changes that you know have been disputed by others. Sterile edit-warring is disruptive, even if it's done slowly enough not to touch 3RR. Also, you reverted blindly, erasing an unrelated change made in the meantime by Matia (the Category:Arvanites entry). I don't suppose that was on purpose; if yes, please please discuss this with us! If you persist in these tactics, you run the risk of other editors adopting a policy of just reverting anything you do on sight. For the moment, I'll leave in the ""related"" box (I'm pretty neutral on that one), but reinstating the category. (T.|@) " +No. Pierre (b 1905) is the father of Amine (aka Amin), who is father of Pierre, (d 2006). +" Governing Body The article states that he is a member of the Sinn Féin's governing body what is this? Talk " +" I know you are writing these things in good faith, Yop, but your claim that Warren's skin or hair color calls into question her claim to Native ancestry is offensive. On that logic, the racial identity of everyone who identifies as racially mixed but 'looks white' should be questioned. The difference between Warren and 'white-looking' mixed people such as Mariah Carey and Rashida Jones is that the latter have actual, identifiable parents or grandparents who are racial minorities (African American). On the other hand, all of Warren's ancestors are white. That is why she was and is criticized for this: She said she was a ""minority"" when her whole familyincluding distant ancestorsis lily-white. Finally, it is preposterous to suggest that Warren 'looks minority' in the picture you wish to insert in the article. She looks completely white in all pictures. While some people who look white are multiracial, in her case, she looks white because she is fully white. " +" AWB What are the ""necessary editing skills"" part supposed to mean. I understand WP very well. (talk) " +Snuggums doesn't know what he talks about. Ignore him. He's a vandal. +" PS: Your edit in itself was OK. The language of that sentennse was in fact impossible because I had left too many words there. I have clarified it now, without having to mention the ""Blot-Sven"" epithet more than once in ""her"" article. " +To be frank, I believe the issue lies in the fact that he's a provost. I can't see the notability for that. If you believe removing the prod is the best decision, then I will respect that and ponder taking it to AfD. (talk) +Why do you hate him or her? +ROH In ECW in punks ECW debut the fans aknowlegd him from ROH.this should be noted +" , you're right that it's prohibited to call others Munafiq, but in this case I was right. Look at the differences between your contributions and GorgeCustersSabre's one. It's simple to understand who would be Mu'min and who would be Munafiq. '''''' talk " +And what will happen if they don't cease immediately oh you powerful one? Oh, I forgot, you said block!! HAHAHAHA god, you are really stupid, aren't you? -) 09:33, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) +stating in unambiguous terms +" Handle in text: It is not clear exactly what the alternative to this RFC proposal is, or what a ""no"" or ""yes"" might yield, so I will spell out what I see here as the best solution. I agree with Gamaliel and Nomoskedasticity that this is a BLP issue and that using ""Filipino"" alone is utterly unacceptable and POV. I do think ""Filipino-American"" correctly describes the subject of the article, and is not an indication of citizenship, but rather it is a demographic description which could accurately be used. However, per TheRedPenOfDoom, and MarkBernstein, I think that this may be best handled as Bbb23 and Seb suggested - and how the lead is now worded - which is to not use either identifier in the first sentence, but instead unpack it, spell out in more detail the actual facts in an NPOV manner, in the lead and in the rest of the article which the intro summarizes. This works and does not take sides in the serious BLP issue. We further make clear how Vargas self-identifies, which I think is important here, without having Wikipedia editors take a position. As MarkBernstein said, we are not required to indicate nationality or citizenship in the first sentence or anywhere, and TRPoD is right about disclaimers etc. -sometimes it is best to go at it from a different angle. We also had the same kind of issue at - believe it or not - Bee Gees where there were warring factions who disagreed about whether they should be called English, Australian, or Manx; we handled it by leaving off the nationality, and the wars stopped. So, I support this wording: Jose Antonio Vargas (born February 3, 1981) is a journalist, filmmaker, and immigration activist. Born in the Philippines, and raised in the United States from the age of 12, he was part of The Washington Post team... etc. /talk " +I'll explain it again shall I. Bilinge Hospital was closer to Wigan than it was to St Helens. By road Billinge Hospital to St Helens= 6.9 miles, St Helens to Whiston Hospital= 4.8 miles. Why would someone drive to Billinge from the middle of St Helens when thier wife was giving birth when they could be at Whiston faster?, what would be the point?. Why would I want to put 'Wigan' in every article. A good 75-80 per cent of the Metropolitan Borough of Wigan were born at Billinge Hospital (not just the immediate area i.e.Wigan. Orrell, Pem, Ince etc etc). A much smaller percentage of the of the Met Borough of St Helens (i.e. Rainford, Haydock, Garswood, Billinge Chapel End) were born there, most were born at Whiston (including those from the centre of St Helens, as Whiston is closer.) Why is this not reflected in the article? I put the word 'Wigan' in the article when it needs to be in it i.e. Bilinge Hospital was the prnciple maternity facility for the Wigan and northern St Helens areas. What is wrong about that? +Fuck You Andre MIchael Brown you undersized cowardly pussy You and that pussy ass dipshit bitch Grey Jinjo are sorely in need of an ass kicking. +" It's actually useful to know something about what you are editing.control " +I'm capable of courteous discussion; just don't make ad hominem arguments against me or use dirty tactics and I'll always be courteous back. Mzilikazi, if you didn't concede defeat then why did you and your allies leave Aesop and Aesop's Fables alone for 8 months? As Judge Judy always says, if it doesn't make sense then it's not true. You were so determined to impose your will on these two articles that you started a 1.5-year edit war resulting in Aesop being changed 11 times (or 21 depending on how you count it) before I came along. You said the above quote and all four of you immediately stopped editing the articles; there's no denying it was an admission of defeat. 8 months later (i.e. February 2013), you went back on your word and started this second edit war. You presumably thought you could get away with it because I wouldn't notice. It's disheartening that nobody else cottoned on to your illegal edits, but nevertheless, here I am and now we have the same cast as we did in the final days of the first edit war except for Johnbod and Haploidavey, who are tainted and thus ineligible to participate because you canvassed them just like Annielogue. ( ) As for the issue of the talk page, you and everyone else involved in your first edit war know that the discussion (at least in the final days) took place over several different pages; no single one constitutes the discussion in its entirety. ( ) +I committed no vandalism +" Canadian charts are not the same as Billboard charts The Canadian Singles Chart is based on CD single sales and nothing more. The Canadian BDS Airplay Chart is a very well-known chart because it's one of the only radio charts that does not use ""recurrent play"" to remove songs, which means that ""Promiscuous"" could re-enter in ten years' time. I'm surprised that Canadian charts are being treated exactly like Billboard charts, but they are very different; for example, the Canadian Dance Chart is not as well known as the airplay chart, but it's still in the article. This is likely because it's being used in the same way, but that's not right. Here it was claimed that non-Canadians should not include the airplay chart if their single did enter the Canadian Singles Chart. However, because it's clearly notable (and because Furtado is Canadian), it's use here is appropriate. " +angered that he was asked +I just took the liberty of removing this statement myself. same poster as above, about thirty seconds later +Well, here's the [that was formed two years ago] that was argued a long time ago and stated that putting bottom 2 is a meaning of saved last. There is also a place in that discussion where MarkMc says that even if it is not the bottom 2, it is the bottom 2 the show wants viewers to believe. 76.107.17.32 +PS- I wish people would relax & realize the Democratic & Republican nominations won't be offically decided until August & September. For goodness sake, it's only February. +Chinese media fabrication Huanqiu Sibuo printed article with a fake Seoul University Professor from a history department who is making claims that a Chinese historical figure/poet, was actually a Korean. First of all, there's no professor named Kim Byung Duk at SNU, and second of all, there is no history department at Seoul University. Article from: http://world.huanqiu.com/roll/2010-05/815820.html +Do Not Delete Larping larry Do not delete Larping Larry. I wish to practice my Wikipedia love. Do not please block me again. +" Yeagh; self-auditing. This sort of demand is @ least similar, if not identical, to demands made in many disciplined activities. ""Cross that bridge when I come to it"", you know. " +" First, you added information that was NOT CORRECT, except for the reason you gave for Yepes's death. And it is not constructive to to add biased, unneutral opinions like Yepes was the most ""notorious""... Second, it is a well-established fact that RAMIREZ and Yepes invented his ten-string guitar. As I said, Bernabe was an apprentice at the Ramirez shop then, but the first Yepes-type ten-string guitar was a RAMIREZ guitar. Moreover, Ramirez had the idea to construct a guitarra d'amor with multiple string resonators INSIDE the body of the guitar. This was rejected by both Segovia and Yepes as impractical. It was Yepes who solved the theoretical and technical problems by adding only 4 strings tuned a very specific way (C, A#, G#, F#) alongside the normal 6 strings. You want a verifiable source? Here: Ramirez III, Jose. 1994. ""The Ten-String Guitar"" in Things About the Guitar. Bold Strummer. pp. 137-141. [ISBN-10: 8487969402] Third, I clearly said Yepes fretted bass notes even when the same bass notes were available as open strings! F# or G# are very often played fretted rather than open! I have this in his own handwriting and own fingering yet you will presume to know better and call this fact ""worthless"" because it disproves your ignorant (unconstructive) remark about Yepes' ""short hands"" being a reason for playing a 10-string guitar. Furthermore, Yepes frequently uses the 7th fretted (because it is the lowest string), but not ""frequently"" the 8th (as you mistakenly claim), which is a minor 7th higher than the 7th string. Moreover, these strings can be used to voice chords as originally written in the urtexts by non-guitarist composers like Ponce or Rodrigo that are impossible on the 6-string (except in the edited versions). Being able to use open strings as ""crutches"" for a lack of technique was certainly NOT part of Yepes's entirely musical reasons for inventing his guitar - though (I will add) many ten-string guitarists today (who are second-rate guitariats in general) have adopted the instrument to make up for weak techniques. This has NOTHING to do with Yepes's own performance practice on his instrument. As someone who has studied for over a decade with one of Yepes's leading (long-term) students, as someone who has thoroughly researched all aspects of the 10-string guitar, as someone who has access to many many unpublished manuscripts and annotations, I can safely say that I know what I am talking about. Yepes even frets A2 and G2# on the 10th string rather than play them on the open A2 and G2# strings (5 and 9) in an example I have in his own handwriting, and the reasons for doing so are in the context entirely MUSICAL and not about any technical limitations, which exist only in your imagination! , you know nothing." +Edit request on 25 January 2013 Autism is a disorder!!! NOT A DISEASE!!! Please reclassify this. 101.103.53.236 +Go to hell Only stooges block people. +Google search ≠ a reliable source. His ethnicity was Anglo-Irish. His citizenship was first British, then Irish and British. His nationality was Irish. +" Donald is right. Talk• Follow " +The links now seem to work on another computer. Axel +GTX 960 is launching next moth, does EXIST and STOP MESSAGING PEOPLE IF YOU'RE THAT CLUELESS If you don't know the GTX 960 does exist and is launching in October, STOP MESSAGING PEOPLE, clueless moron that doesn't know how to use Google to search for information. +" Every other source had this marked as a 2012 release, and there were an equal number of links of the various interested parties (actors, director, production company, etc) that listed this as 2012 movie or had a wikilink to 2012 which redirected to 2011 before I moved the page to 2012 the first time. Also, take note that the WP:FILMRELEASE states ""film's earliest release"" or ""release date of country that produced the film"", it gives no guidelines for which one takes precendent. I would err on the side of 2012 for now, because it just officially got moved from October 2011 to March 2012 on Septermber 9 (date of the source referenced) so the fact that maybe the Irish sources have not yet been updated is a possibility. " +sorry Common misunderstanding. +Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The citation has been provided. +Jan 18 Regarding the page Paul Martin, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +Hello Robbie Just want to let you know I'm still here and watching U68.57.193.169 +If I may butt in here, you're wrong about that, TParis. Having a wide variety of interests on Wikipedia doesn't excuse an editor for being a decidedly tendentious POV pusher on only one or just a few of them. One could be the most fair minded editor in the world when writing about operatic singers but that wouldn't exempt him/her from criticism for POV pushing on the subject of US foreign policy. +Just experimenting. Assume good faith. +Can I insert my big dick into your vagina? It will make you feel good. +The original block of Hajji Piruz was logged here: . I might be wrong, but I think the revised block needs to be logged at the same page. +":::What we are creating with Wikipedia is not set in stone. It is an evolving standard defined by what its editors determine to be acceptable, and personally I don't agree with the view that the priority is to write lengthy prose in the style of Encyclopedia Britannica. I've been around since 2007, Jeh has been around since 2005, and Dsimic has been editing a lot since 2013 (in other words, enough to get a very good idea of how Wikipedia's anarchist system works). I'm glad that Jeh prefaced his statement with ""in my opinion"" because that's what Wikipedia is about, and no personal statement (or even an essay such as commonly-cited arguments to avoid essay) is law. We debate a lot. I know just how much sucks but it's the way it is. Now, whether or not product lists are not-so-good articles is (debatably, if you you're axiologically inclined) an empirical and subjective question which could be most reliably answered by surveying our users, or our editors if they're not your priority. In my experience, lists are great for their purpose, and as a power Wikipedia user and editor, I've derived enormous benefit from them - and our users probably derive much more benefit from an article like Comparison of smartphones than the benefit which is derived from, say, the dozens of references I've added to articles like Tort, Trust law, or Economics and hundreds of much lower traffic niche topics. Lists in general are not easy candidates for ""good articles""; as I recall, back around 2008 or so there was a campaign by a couple people to to delete a lot of list articles on that basis and on the duplication with categories, but when I pointed to WP:CSL, the steam was taken out even though that didn't change the sensibility of the decisions. In any case, you are welcome to boldly make and advocate for changes, and I reserve the right to express my own opposition within the limits of my available free time. ) As an aside, I mention the views of users seriously - it has been pretty well empirically shown that oldtimers like myself are actively hostile to newcomers (as documented by Aaron Halfaker ( | (t - c) " +OK I have commented on the related talk page. +" Rasmussen Reports in Controversies and allegations of bias ""A poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports during October, 2004 found that the public perceived Fox news as the second most politically biased news network, with 34% respondents saying they believed that Fox's goal was to ""help elect Bush"", leaving Fox second only to CBS, which was perceived by 37% as being biased in the wake of the memogate scandal.[1]"" so basically this is saying FNC is not the most biased, CBS is. Im pretty sure this section may as well be removed. The whole Controversies and allegations of bias section is a mess really. Put it all on its own page, this bit only needs to be a brief summary of complaints" +Thanks for experimenting with the page Bonzi Buddy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. +your reason to be unblocked here}} +It's been a while with no further comment on the subject - how do you suggest I procede on this matter? +" Replaceable fair use Image:Hirai_006.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Hirai_006.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tast " +" yes, and as I just pointed out several reliable sources call loanwords Konglish. What you view as ""common sense"" doesn't meet WP:V, and is essentially WP:OR. The list I was creating isn't finished and is taken from a reliable source. Not random words people have pulled off the internet. If you admit that you're not looking at the sources, then why are you trying to push your view of Konglish into the article. " +LULZ HAHAHAHAHAHA ==> +In Vukovar we had an conclusion, see conversation before with. So, for what? +statement that has no bearing with regard to NPOV +Help! Hey, Will where be 'ya? Haven't heard from yo in a while. I made a signature but still don't understand how to get it do it shows up with the tildas. I tried putting it in preferences but it came out all weird. your buddy, +hi buddy You say that my page is blatant advertisement ok I agree with that then What the big Microsoft Co-operation Doing here that is not a blatant advertisement or what. +" Thanks and like the statement I've said before, his trollish comments reminds me of someone and I'm really tempted to WP:RFCU for his relation (if any) with . But again as before, I'm leaving it as it is now because I'm not going to be the arresting officer, judge and executioner, all rolled into one. ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ " +It depends on how it's used. If it's used to source something like a date or something tangential to the subject (like say a date William the Conqueror took the throne in Ealdred's article) it's probably okay. Specialist encyclopedias (like the ODNB or a chemical handbook) are a different story, but generally, you shouldn't cite a generalist encyclopedia more than once or twice for general overview information. - Talk +" Sorry, it was me alo " +A serious citation of your claim would be welcome , but this isnt it. There is no mention of hemel = heaven in either of them. +even post lists of books for further reading? +I'm sorry, but you are now dead to the hairball association +Andy Murray Please don't remove cited sources simply because you disagree with them. This is not the level of personal interaction expected from editors on Wikipedia. If you want to make any changes, please discuss them on a talk page first. +What's the problem? The Guardian is quoted....unless you consider it a biased newspaper then leave it. +" I have just used the wayback machine well so you are not trying much. Click on ""Stephen Lawrence"" and on the second link from the top." +" Removed ""For this (and other reasons, namely the inability for governments to control, regulate and tax distribution, and also concerncing the unnecessarily suffering, often addicted, consumers of drugs affected of prohibitionist laws)"" This doesn't make any sense. No suggestions for replacing it, but also doesn't seem sensible to keep. " +Oh, that can surely be done.. but this discussion is on the scope of History of Pakistan. +this book is so boring nad dumb how could any one ever read itIn +Reverting edits about admin abuse doesn't help your case either. - +Assholes On behalf of all Americans, Canadians, Japanese and other countries who have yet to see it, thank you for spoiling the fucking movie. +" I think our readers need to know that Lynn has exhibited ""scandalous disregard for scientific objectivity"" according to a review in Scientific American, a mainstream scientific news source satisfying WP:RS. In my mind, that calls into question his entire body of work, not merely his work on African IQ. To claim otherwise strikes me as disingenuous and tendentious. I might add that to devote so much space to Schockley, Lynn and Weyl and Possony would seem to me to violate the undue weight section of WP:NPOV, since dysgenics in non-humans, its main use, is barely covered in the article. That, along with the lack of critical comment on Weyl and Possony, justify the NPOV tag, I think. (talk) " +Thanks Sandy! I don't think it would have gotten this far without your help! +fucK of ff f f f f f f f f +Superbug I think this article is relevant and information from it should be added to the wiki: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/08/22/4748386/superbug-outbreak-in-us-research.html 68.198.104.107 +you were called upon to produce evidence by one Rlevse supporting your assertion of 'meatpuppetry'. will you be doing that soon or will you permit the ban to hold until for its full duration? +Conflict Of Interest Mel Etitis, I think you should divulge your conflict of interest with the Peter J. King article and related sockpuppet. talk-email +PS there's going to be a scream 5 so you should make an article on it and a scream spin-off called: Scream: Resurrection Please unblock/(at least explain how I apparently broke rules?) and do those screamicles XD}} +REDIRECT Talk:Mother (video game series) +Look here CovenantD on this website there have been others who have demanded citation and when I contribute using information I saw off Entertainment News programs or statements in Talk Show interviews they all don't mind. So why don't you do the same I can contribute too you know +", 5 April 2006 (UTC) I'll clear this up about my intentions: I have been told, or glanced over (in passing) several materials purporting the Caribbean slave contribution to the population of Charleston and Savannah (among New Orleans and other multiracially populated areas). It is also rather obvious about the romantic Pocahontas connection to ideas of Roanoke survivors, in discussions of Virginia. These things are dismissed as fancy, but they are distinct beliefs of those who attempt to put a face on what the Melungeon community has had as an inception. So you see, I am an extreme skeptic to the fantasies described by ignorant rednecks...but I do in fact think they are relevant to the beliefs of those promoting the Melungeon identity. One need not endorse a belief of association, but merely allow others to see what sort of identities Melungeon life has acquired. I am confident to declare that there is so much myth obfuscating the reality of what life is like in Appalachia. Appalachian culture is from the Deep South to Maritime Canada. Melungeon culture is centred on the Gulf coast and south of Bermuda on the Eastern seaboardoriginally Spanish areas. People think that just because impoverished Scotch-Irish on the frontier dressed in buckskin and furs, that they were some ""noble savages"" (though they were not Cherokee, but in fact Andrew Jackson's henchmen). So many ideas here wreak of Crank (person) nonsense. Are you the spin doctors making apologetics for the Antebellum South, by having it seem like the perpertrators are actually descended from the victims? Are you sitting in a trailor right now, trying to deny your Jerry Springer lifestyle? Civil War's Reconstruction is a real bitch?! That white Spanish territory is the Melungeon core, in true history. See here: Hispanics contributed Melungeon heritage, via Louisiana and Florida colonies. This was much different from slave owners who raped slaves to make more slaves. Melungeons were basically the first Hispanics in the United States, whom often lived in secret or adapted to Anglo ways. Please, do not spread fantasies as facts in this article! This work as it is, makes me laugh my ass off at the premise of what it's trying to do! 08:41" +" didn't try to explain his ""refugee crisis"" edit on the talk page after multiple undo's. Only later came up with a source that substantiates nothing. The IP 37.76.11.111 was me (I did not care to log in for a mere undo) but not 37.76.42.195. It's not only me in Hungary interested in AND AFFECTED DIRECTLY by this crisis who think in the same way about it. Furthermore i would like to COMPLAIN ABOUT THE CLEAR BIAS of towards The New York Times bordering on BRAND BUILDING: not cites almost EXCLUSIVELY The NYT, but insist on MENTIONING IT BY NAME in the lead section of the article. " +Sorry for the misunderstandings. There is a review tag at the site now, so I think it's all taken care of. ) +" As I said, Jechoman is constantly attacking me since this edit. Why the fuck I'm being stalked for a completely reasonable edit?.90.179.235.249 ""Antisemitic conspiracy theory promotion""? What the hell are you talking about? You were trying to mislead a new editor by implying there is a policy in force which in fact does not exist. And why should not be Jewish religion described as religion? 90.179.235.249 " +" I am probably going to change my userpage design in a couple of weeks, too. But, just CC-BY-SA the design, okay? I will probably get the ads done by this week. " +" My talk page Thank you for attending to the vandalism of my page, which occurred while I was not logged in. I As this has happened on wo occasioions recently, almost certainly by the same user albeit using different new accounts, I have semi-protected my talk page. Just for your information.""talk"" " +Your blanking of comments on the Juan Cole page is Vandalism Discussion logs are not the same as an article. Your blanking of my comments in the discussion section of the article Juan Cole was vandalism. +" Dispute I noticed there's an edit war going on with regard to the debunkingprimaltherapy link, and the link at the end of the ""Primal Therapy"" section. My opinion is as follows. I think the link at the end of the ""Primal Therapy"" section should lead to the ""Primal Therapy"" article, not to the criticism section specifically. I feel that way because the section in the page entitled ""Primal Therapy"" is relevant to the entire primal therapy article (including the criticisms) and not to the criticisms alone. It would be quite possible to have both links at the bottom of the paragraph (""see Primal Therapy, including the criticism section...""). I wouldn't be opposed to that. Personally I don't believe that the section ""Primal Therapy"" should be on the biography page at all; we should have a link only: ""Arthur Janov is the creator of (linked) Primal Therapy, and author of many books on that subject"". IMO there is no need to discuss primal therapy (or its criticisms) in any detail on a biography page, because those things are not biographical details. They are not relevant here. They belong in the Primal Therapy article, and there is no need to repeat that article here. With regard to the DBT.com link. I don't believe this page is an appropriate place for any kind of dispute about Primal Therapy, one way or the other, since this article is not about Primal Therapy. I don't believe that we should include here links to any sites unless they are specifically relevant to the biography of Arthur Janov. If we do have any such links (like the DBT.com link) then we must revisit the whole debate here, and we must include other links, otherwise we violate NPOV by representing only one side. It would be better just not to have such links. Bear in mind that Art Janov is an exceedingly minor historical figure. His biography should be only a few paragraphs. It's not really the best place for an extensive argument. I realize you guys are concerned about people being led astray by reading the wiki, but I really don't think that's a major concern. Anyone who follows a ""Primal Therapy"" link and reads the article will realize that Primal Therapy has been criticized. The readers aren't dense and don't need things repeated. In other words, I don't think anyone could be misled or led astray by a simple link (and nothing more) on the biography page. We should achieve some kind of consensus before editing the article. If we can't achieve consensus then we should solicit outside opinion. " +Zack Ryder and Curt Hawkins Why are you picking on them? How come The Naturals aren't merged together even though they broke up on the indies after Hawkins and Ryder? 69.243.42.251 +" {{unblock|In looking over WP:BLOCK, the only section that seems to apply here is ""Disruption"". Within this section, the only line that is relevant is ""persistent gross incivility"". Now, I do not believe Magog has shown evidence of persistent incivility, much less could what I said in the AfD (""pretentiousness, forcefullness and over-the-top deletionism tactics"") be interpreted as gross incivility. Let us not play games with semantics and equate my comments with personal attacks. I never used profanity or hate speech, I was never sexist or racist. If this block is allowed, it is simply censorship and abuse of admin rights. Please, if another admin decides to deny this request, do please direct me to how I can proceduraly make myself heard on this issue after the block has expired and have the admin actions of editor Magog be reviewed. Respectfully127 " +Spells in Harry Potter Would you mind looking into this issue? (You may need to look into today's history to clear up any confusion.) +Iago Aspas It's your lucky day, already protected by another admin! Snowman +" You've got nothing to say to me. It is quite obvious that your edits to both of those article were POINTY and designed to be disruptive. I find your claims of innocence unconvincing. -''''''The '45 " +August 2009 (UTC) Nothing you have written before or since has changed my opinion, in fact it has been reinforced. I am unclear as to why you persist in posting here. 09:38, 21 +what is right and what is wrong +SlimVirgin You've been reported as a suspected sockpuppet of SlimVirgin. I'm sure that will last as long as the new holocaust article. Make my day. +" I am writing about the title of the country X and in that article you are telling me I should add: ""This article includes text from the Wikipedia article X.""" +Initiating ArbCom is not inherently harassment; you could let them judge instead of preventing me from saying anything or adding diff links to the case I have already submitted.}} +An article about Lincoln which does not mention Speed is just pure censorship. Speed was his closest, most intimate friend, as they both state many times in their letters. The sole possible reason for excising Speed is censorship of this part of his life. That isn't acceptable. No historian of Lincoln would find that acceptable. In fact there is no history of Lincoln whatsoever which excises Speed. If you can find one, post it. The sources are clear that he was his most intimate friend. +Wow Bencherlite. That is what I call service. Thank you +" A tag has been placed on Diminished lights (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +Hi DeltaQuad. In my opinion user Nmate does not like Slovak editors (just look at his blocking history (15:15, 22 April 2008 Elonka (talk | contribs) blocked Nmate (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (Personal attacks or harassment of other users: Ethnic slurs and incivility) and his activity on Wikipedia). I don't know lassi and Nmate's allegations are ridiculous ) Best Regards. +" When I said ""Yobmod came, he saw, he fucked up this article"" this was because I was extremely pissed off at Yobmod's constant deletion of links to actual themes used in science fiction and giving rules for the page which makes finding themes that can be used on the article more harder then a pet owner's decision to put down their beloved animal (we had to use themes that were used in science fiction, they couldn't be used in any other genre, they had to appear in more then one franchise and we couldn't use several dozen tv shows as citations). Although what you did to the Home and Away character articles you'd probably agree with him. It's obvious that user who found a citation to Willow being produced by Imagine Entertainment is a sockpuppet of GabrielKat, and his/her edit to my discussion page really annoyed me. Anyhoo, yes I do agree to behave in a more civilised manner, like I was before, but even civilised people react so uncivilised if they are constantly annoyed by someone. " +We also do not use sources we beleive to be suspect. +Wikipedia:Non-free content policy and guideline Please do not place or replace any non-free images to any pages except for actual articles, as you did at . Continuing to do so can be viewed as disruptive behaviour and you may be blocked from editing. +India related links • Talk • [ Reply] +Seems like archive.ls is denied following an RFC. This web.archive seems to have all the relevant ones though, so I've added that. +RE:talk page Youre welcome, By the way, will the page be deleted, since it's uselwss now? TLK | Y! +STOP VANDALISING SREBRENICA GENOCIDE ARTICLE Stop vandalizing Srebrenica Genocide article. Stop removinig factual elements of cases and substituting them with already discredited Serbian sources. I've warned you in the past, this is the last warning. +Sourcing See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 18 for evidence. Also, Talk:Halloweentown shows earlier history before the split and disambiguation. +" In some parts of Canada the situation is legislatively divided into warring U.S. and British camps . For instance, in British Columbia and Alberta, Doctors of Podiatric Medicine (D.P.M.) still exist. In Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, New Brunswick, Yukon,and N.W.T standards are slightly higher and are based on quackery-based charlatan British Chiropodists who insist on calling themselves ""Podiatrists"". In Manitoba, for example, about 15 or so quack Chiropodists insist on titling themselves ""Dr."" despite having bogus (3-4 year) qualifications. This disgusting Manitoba movement is designed to blur the distinction between British Chiropodists and USA DPM's. In the province of Ontario, MAJOR differences in scope of practice exist. Consequently, there is still a title distinction between UK chiropodists and USA DPM podiatrists ( ie. American Doctors of Podiatric Medicine). Unfortunately, both share a governing body, the College of Chiropodists of Ontario. To accelerate Ontarians into confusing U.S. trained podiatrists with bogus UK ""podiatrists"", the British Chiropodists who are in greater number, heavily lobby the provincial Government regularly into perpetuating & maintaining the banned prefix ""Dr."" and the associated title ""podiatrist"". Unbelievably, and quite maliciously, British Chiropodists have lobbied provincial legislators into forcing all USA DPM's who migrate after 1993 into accepting and only using the title chiropodist. This is plainly maliciously designed so that the Ontarian public cannot distinguish the vast difference in educational qualifications. The APMA & ACFAS is now studying this injustice and blatant discrimination " +, 26 April 2015 (UTC) note restored stop fucking hounding mr the rollback eas a mistake btw am on mobile 15:26 +At First is my observations. http://thatgrapejuice.net/2008/10/keri-hilson-return-the-favor-ft-timbaland-video (2nd comment) +Just because a child grows up doesn't mean it stops being a sibling. It just becomes an adult and begins to be treated as an equal by it's parent. I'm sure those ex - colonies would be very different places with very different people had the UK never existed. THerefore by grace of building those countries the UK is a parent country. Doesn't mean to say those countries are children, they once were, however now they are adult nations themeselves and are now treated equally as a result +It seems Jimbo Wales is logged on, or has been so in the past, but its clear he's too scared to answer me. ( ) +" A minor point of etiquette: In general, editing another user's personal page is not considered good manners. If you want to talk about something on that page, use the user's talk page, accessible through the ""discuss this page"" link. 22:56, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)" +Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to BOO LONGHORNS, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. +Thank you for your message, Raymond. Unfortunately, though I had many opportunities to take a picture myself, I did not take this one and don't know the photographer, personally. I'll go the Fair Use route. Give me the weekend to do so, please. User:HopsonRoad +" I present you with these balloons to celebrate your birthday. I hope you have a great day. .Bryant " +Queens of the stone age Here's just a big thanks for all the editing you do to all QOTSA related wikipedia articles. Don't know if your discussion page is for more important things, but hey. +" December 2013 Hi. I noticed the edit you made to a specific article here on this site. Well I need you to know that I am gabsadds " +" Yeah Littlecarmen's right. If you can directly put Pop to infobox of Lana Del Rey and pure pop artists like Britney Spears I think in that way Pop loses its feature. It may not be that (Alternative) Rock but it's not that Pop too. I can't see ANY material's genre on ""Lana is a pop music original full-stop"" sentence by the way... " +Armenian Genocide Finally, i have decided to add my comments.What a shame that you armenians are trying to show it had been happened to you what you have done against Turks only for money and land request. By the way, armenian genocide was not recognized by the slandered government.So this propaganda article is illegal... +Once again, leave me alone. You are bothering me for the sake of bothering me. You don't even need to reply. Just stop typing and pressing Save on my User:Talk, please. Thank you. +Wiki work offer I have a number of aircraft (civil and military) ariticles in sndboxes on my userspace I could use some writing help with. Basically, I have texts from several copyrighted sources there, and it all needs to be combined and rewritten. Rewriting's not my strong suit, and I keep procrastinating doing this. You don't have to know much about the topics, just be able to understand what you read, and be able to rewrite it in a readable manner. If it sounds like something you'd be interested in doing, feel free to take a look at my , and see if you can help. Thanks, whatever your response! - +" Some ideas from me. I will be potentialy out of internet contact in a few weeks so may not be much help. Have it as another tab on the tabs already on GA pages Specifically go out to recruit people, either dropping personal notes at talk pages, wikiprojects and the signpost (maybe even a watchlist header if you can swing it) Advertise it as purely to get inexperienced editors reviewing. Make it clear that there will be help right the way through the process and they can't really make too much of a mess. See if you can get some regulars who are willing to have their articles reviewed by these new reviewers. That should help alleviate any biting issues. The bonus for the regulars is that they will get there articles reviewed faster. I would not treat this as a way to clear the backlog, but to get those reviewers who have considered reviewing, but were a little unsure whether they could. This has the added bonus of increaing reviewer numbers (and so reducing the backlog) and making sure the new reviewers devlelop good habits from the start. End of ramble.  (talk) " +" That is not a reliable source. It is a biographical database, not unlike IMDb, and cannot be used as a source for biographical data for all of the same reasons. bons mots " +" Now that you have raised the issue, I think we need another article for the ""Fall"" section of the Byzantine Empire. The Decline of the Byzantine Empire article is a mere chronological list of events that bled the Empire to death and not specifically associated with the actual ""Fall"" between the 13th and 15th centuries. I am open to any suggestions as to what it could be named - how about Byzantium under the Palaiologoi? If thats accepted then Byzantium under the Komnenoi sounds reasonable and within a similar convention. Then we could have Byzantium under the Heraclean, Byzantium under the Isaurian, Byzantium under the Macedonian and so forth. " +Double Agent Someone struck out the category entry for Double agent, on the grounds that it is a category for real people, not fictional ones. Someone else put it back. Now, I have to agree that the cat appears to be exclusively for real spys, so Snape should not be in it. Comments? +The whole article at [Charydibibidis] shouldn't even be there in the first place. It was created as a fricken plug for some kid's IRC netowrk. 99.142.17.112 +hi dipshit just so we're clear, i'm into vandalizing, making occassional intentional errors, and making valuable contributions that none of you other idiots know anything about. the problem is, which is which? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLpenis +Yes, thats right, use your admin power to dispose of a real threat in your purge. I wouldn't be caught dead with a hammer and sickle on my user page. Why do you sport one if you claim to be so against it? +" Are you trying to be funny? If you are serious, and I get it correctly, you mean when someone mentioned ""I'm an expert for Cunt"", another will respond with ""Yes, I'm a big fan of Pussy too"". I might be wrong though." +Heh, yeah I meant do not. I did say aggressive, and I also lamented I could not reduce it further. The reason I did not take it further is because not fragmenting discussion takes precedence over file limitations. If there is even a possibility a thread is ongoing (as there was for everything I left since it was posted in the last few days) you leave it. As to reinstating some of it, I will reinstate everything, not out of spite... but because to not do so means more work for everyone actually involved in the discussion. - Boy +" A tag has been placed on Intimo y personal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. talk " +" Hello and Sorry Hello Alison I was unblocked for good behavior and wanted to tell you I am sorry for what happened in the past. Quoting Benjamin Franklin ""Insanity is doing the same thing, and expecting different results"". I had everyone telling me the same repetitve phrases over and over again, asking them what they meant, and not understanding because they said the same thing and expected me to understand, it is not like I am asking to hear it again because this is on a screen, I could read it again without having to ask. -Peter Like you told me to assume good faith, and I took that as a passive verb (subject is object of verb) that you were telling me to assume good faith on my behalf, and I asked what you meant and you pretty much just repeated yourself. Obviously not saying you are insane, but it was an insane way of trying to communicate with me. I am also autistic which makes communication even harder. -Peter " +Thank you for your kind comments Please feel free to view this link as a token of my appreciation. Thank you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PaHcZUHI00 +Why have you changed the Pete Price article? We all know he is a shapeshifting reptilian humanoid and by you removing this to protect this welsh no mark DJ's dark secret, it has led me to believe that you also are a reptilian humanoid who runs the world. David Icke will morally condemn you and you should be locked away for a long period of time. You are everything I loathe in a human being, everything I loathe. You are merely a Jack Russell, snapping at the heels of a Rottweiler... +Fisting What is your obsession with posting photos of yourself engaged in this disgusting act?? +I've squashed this a bit, removing the bits that seem less relevant. It may well be true that a just major 3rd through distortion sounds nice than 12TET major 3rd - but I'll let someone else do the maths / find the reference. +" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello Dusanr, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page |- ! +" A barnstar for you! The Technical Barnstar Thank you very much for  Vesey Joseph Kaipayil Per your decline at WP:RPP (which reassured me that I haven't gotten too easy at AfC -)), would you mind unsalting the page so it can be moved? I don't know who originally salted it, since the page history is only for the latest version. All the best, (talk) | chat _ Thanks! (talk) Do a Snotbot run I was wondering if Snotbot (great name) task #5 could be run on this and this. Sure, can do. | babble _ Running now. Once you see the bot activity stop, feel free to mark those categories as done. | yak _ Thank you Working on a new tool If you're interested, you can see an early version here. It allows you to perform arbitrary searches through the recent changes database. So, it helps with looking for particular types of edits that were recently made. Might be useful for vandal fighters. I still have some work to do on it, but it's working. Let me know if you have any comments or suggestions. I'll announce it more widely once it's more complete. | spill the beans _ Blocked Scottywong, I've blocked you for 24 hours. I appreciate you probably feel provoked, but this does not justify your comments. Now that's a unique outcome. Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree that what I said is a blockable offense, I just wonder why when a different editor says the exact same phrase and someone complains, the complainant gets told to shut the fuck up and do something useful, and stop trying to be the civility police. Was I using the phrase in a different context? I'm not looking for an unblock, I'm just looking for a formal acknowledgement that there is a double standard. For more info, see Wikipedia:ANI#Malleus_Fatuorum_and_Cornellier this ANI thread and this AN thread. I'd appreciate a response. | verbalize _ I'd imagine because it's a different admin who handled that dispute. I'd agree there's a total double standard here; all I can g +" I feel bad for you actually. You sit around constantly editing pages to attack republicans on wikipedia, do you think that makes a difference to anyone? Its rather pathetic, I hope you don't devote your life to such trivial matters. Goodluck, I really hope you get some help. ""Thanks.""" +" Why did Saturn fail??? I came to this entry to find out why GM is having to close Saturn - obviously decreasing sales - but why did this occur??? I would have thought that a new car company - away from the strangling management and unions of GM, started from scratch to compete against foreign small cars, would have been a winner - after all, the problem with GM/Detroit right now is that they don't make the right kind of cars, don't make small cars to compete with foreign small cars. But this article tells me . . . . . absolutely nothing about what went wrong at Saturn. Another useless Wikipedia entry. I guess I'll have to go someplace else to find out what happened to Saturn. P.S.More and more entries at Wikipedia are becoming like this, i.e. leaves out tons of pertinent information (can NEVER have negative information in a Wikipedia entry - that is VERBOTIM!!!) until the article is useless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.54.161 " +Unintelligible to non-experts Like most maths articles on Wikipedia, this one is unintelligible to someone that does not already know the material. Consider an intelligent programmer with a basic knowledge of maths who wants to get an ideal of what all the talk about Baysian Networks is about, and whether they should read more. Well, they won't be any the wiser from this article. I have a PhD in Comp Sci (but limited knowledge of this field) and I can only follow the sprinkler example with effort, so don't tell me that it is intelligible. The topic is technical, and we certainly do not want journalistic waffle. But an introductory example of showing how the joint probablilities for a simple two node example can be simplified would be a good start. Then maybe somthing about independent nodes which is not even mentioned. Etc. The goal of Wikipedia is not to demonstrate how clever Wikipedians are. +" I had no way of knowing for sure though.  (talk • contribs • email) True, I just didn't know if that was really ""allowed"". Thanks, though!  (talk • contribs • email) " +" For Whom the Bell Tolls?? Triple H hadn't used this one at WM XXVII he used his regular theme ""The Game""" +I have just lost stacks of work because of you! Please chck before blocking London in future, especially as you have been warned before. +, most probably via a google search +" ""Broken English"" Well I am a native English speaker, I was born and raised in the Bay Area, I'm sorry if its not good enough for you, I am learning disabled I have dislexia and ADHD and perhaps I cannot see the mistakes you see in my writing, but I think your completely reverting of my edits rather than copyediting is destructive and in poor taste, can we please collaberate instead? " +Thank you so much Thank you so much for making my wikipedia experience a fruitful and interesting affair. I hope you have fun spending the rest of your life in front of a computer screen editing other people's work. +Trust me, that's a feeling most of us share, but you know how things work around here. We try to be as neutral as possible for a long as possible. I do hope you all can reach a consensus regarding information on the article, since it has potential to actually become featured some day. Cheers. +Apology I'm still waiting for one. -You know who. +June 2010 (UTC) You probably don't see any useful information with regard to the subject matter either. I know I don't. 12:38, 29 +And your childish revenge temper tantrum will accomplish absolutely nothing. That is, besides a bunch of blocked IPs, and talk page blocks. What kind of life is it that has no purpose? Besides, you can't block me anyway unless you shut down Wikipedia. 108.196.186.171 +Good. Your encouragement of those who did however was idiotic and self-centered. Too many self-centered arrogant people on this planet. Go away, your big ego is not more important than those people with social anxiety disorder who need help. +" I agree with you completely. Also, note that And the Band Played On was written by a gay man from within the gay community. It's obvious from how this article uses ""homosexual"" so frequently as a noun, that it hasn't had enough previous influence from the gay community. Hopefully, that will now change. Let's see this article become even better still by the correct use of ""homosexual"" and the incorrect use changed appropriately. Political correctness has nothing to do with it. " +. I find that the comments concerning the biasness of the Hungarian media and the real estate affairs of the Hungarian PM require references +Fair use images in your user page Hi! Note that fair use images can only be used in articles (:Image:World cup.png cannot be used in user pages). Also, the image of the Pumas may be deleted soon because the user who uploaded it did it without knowing which tag to use. Cheers! +" Copyright problems Hello. Concerning your contribution, Selective marker in human disease, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Selective marker in human disease appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Selective marker in human disease has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Selective marker in human disease and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Selective marker in human disease with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Selective marker in human disease. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. " +Your edits to Animism and Sadistic personality disorder Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +You list feminism as the prominent advocate against sexism directed at men, before men's rights. You are arguing that the definition of equal rights for both sexes (as used in the context of one form of feminism which, the article suggests stands out mainly in its criticism of other more vocal forms of feminism) places feminism in this cell: under those circumstances, egalitarianism trumps all movements, as its definition is entirely unambiguous. What makes feminism more noteworthy than both egalitarianism and men's rights in this endeavor? (talk • contribs) +Contested deletion This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (your reason here) 68.193.147.157 This guy's a douche. Get rid of him. +"Dude, just listen to yourself. Do you really have nothing better to do than chastise Catholics for not calling ourselves ""Roman"" as you think we should? You have too much time on your hands, and too little brains in your head. Seriously, get it together. It's not my fault if Protestants are generally ignorant about their Catholic brethren. " +" I'm short of time at the moment, and a lot of the policy and guideline pages have had their content shuffled around, but here is a recent template deletion discussion that illustrates some of the problems with SourceWatch as a reliable source. Beyond issues of bias, the main reason that open wikis are not allowed as reliable sources is that one can never guarantee what is going to appear on the screen at any given random time, when the source page is loaded. It could be good info, or it could be ""POOP"". That is the main reason that Wikipedia is not allowed to source itself, and the principle holds for all wikis. As to the Drudge issue, I think that the arguments presented on Talk:George Soros in opposition to including well-sourced criticism from Bill O'Reilly apply here, and Eleemosynary was a strong opponent of including that information in the Soros article. The O'Reilly criticism is nowhere near as harsh and derogatory as the piece I removed from Drudge. O'Reilly is certainly more notable (as is his opinion) than the NYPress author. I really would like to see a consistent treatment of sources in all articles, and I try to apply that wherever I edit, but I already have about a thousand articles on my watchlist, so I can't fix everything. - " +" Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Adam bloomfield. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. , Recent changes patrol" +Merging with Mid Sweden University page It has been suggested since October 2011, that the page for the Student Union in Sundsvall be merged with the Mid Sweden University. I, as one of the contributors and a member of the board of the student union in Sundsvall, am against such suggestion for following reasons: Student unions in Sweden are independent organizations, and therefore should be treated as independent organizations. Mid Sweden University, has 3 campuses and each campus has its own independent student union. While the directing body of the University is the same for 3 campuses, the directing body of the student unions in Härnösand, Sundsvall and Östersund are different. Thank you, +" Request for Arbitration filed on Derek Smart Hello, A request for arbitration has been filed on the article Derek Smart, which you have been involved with in some manner. If you would like to contribute to the request, or subsequent case if accepted, please visit WP:RFAR. SWATJester On Belay! " +You're talking in plurals, while you are the only person who seems to be constantly doing what you're doing to articles on Fascism; please stop claiming false consensus when you are a one man army in your crusade. You have already clashed with other editors such as +from her/his shadows +Robison family murder Thank you very much for helping us get this entry in the proper style and format for Wiki. It has been a challenge to do so due to unfamiliarity of the process. There are two of us trying to make this work in progress correct. The facts are true, well researched and very well documented. We are currently working on substance, format and visual syntax style for Wiki. Please don't hesitate to help us out. After we get the text in proper format, we will add our footnote citations. We would profit from your help there if you could assist us. Please be patient with us we find the process a bit challenging to a novice. But be reassured we are not novices with respect to the Robison family murder facts and details. +) Like pointed out in the very first reply, I am not arguing facts, but rather asking you to make your statements verifiable. Keep in mind that I've not even reverted your edits, but patiently waited for your to act on my requests. Instead JoergenB did it for you. Whatever it is you want to argue about Fridell's e-mail isn't relevant to this discussion. Like I've suggested before: if you have a sudden burst of creativty but can't recall the sources immidiately, let it all out in a sub-page like and include it in main article space afterwards. And I'll remove any future posts that are topped off by nasty li'l insults and irrelevant insinuations such as these. Isotalo 11:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC +You are asking to be reported for abusing admin privileges. If you think removing valuable data from a long standing article after a couple of hours biased chit chat between friends on the talk page are valid good faith edits, you need to start doing some serious rethinking of what possible purpose you even serve on wikipedia. Considering that i wrote the majority of the article and all you and your buddies have done is try to trash it, saying that i am disruptive is quite ignorant. +THOSE WHO CAN, DO...THOSE WHO CAN'T, BECOME COPS! +i still edit, asshole.24.196.119.217 +So want my recommendation, plain english, cut the Obama remarks, nothing to do with the arrest, unless Obama was part of the incident. You americans, you think everyting is so simple, white/black, there no racial harmony, as a Latino a look at this discussion page at it amaze me how much people have to discuss, the beer, who the hell care? This is not the American Wikipedia, but the World Wide Wikipedia in the English language. You want my opinion here it goes trim the Obama part its not part of the arrrest narratative, unlees there is undertone. +" Wtwilson3 Sorry for the confusion. I wasn't looking for help expanding the article. I didn't write it, I just moved it, and I was just worried about the fact that a page of the same name, probably about a different person, was deleted last month. And when I moved the page, it created a double-redirect from the archived AfD discussion. I'm still learning my way around, and I hadn't been checking ""What Links Here"" (I'm checking now.) Also, sorry I forgot to sign, I'm a cab driver and was being rushed out the door by the dispatcher. Signing is one thing I learned to do early, I just forgot. Thanks for your time and your help. " +What would be the purpose of the discussion? +" Reliable Source I'm a high school teacher. My students always ask me if they can use Wikipedia. They seem stunned when I say they can, and they often reply with an astonished ""But is not reliable - anyone can edit it!"" I simply laugh them off and and share the countless studies that have shown Wikipedia to be in the high 90% reliable range. I am curious though...what would you have teachers like myself say to students conducting research on Wikipedia concerning its reliability? " +Shaansoft CEO here Dear Editor, Shaansoft is a popular brand in the growing software market of India , Bhutan and Nepal. we have used the contents from our official website . As a CEO of the company I have the right to put the copyright materials on the Wiki. Kindly bear me Regards Shantanu Kar CEO, Shaansoft ceo@shaansoft.com +Official Punjab Government citations have now been added in the section +the edit difference here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alstom&action;=historysubmit&diff;=405398192&oldid;=405397279 +this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this page shall be deleted.this +" Distortion of sources by by lowering the number of casualties from 6,000 to 35 in the Gemlik Yalova massacres questions all sources which he doesn't like on the other hand he adds (""retaliates"") without hesitation weak sourced massacres (with large numbers)committed by Turks against Greeks in the List of massacres in Turkey.( See, See) This already proves his unreliable POV behaviour, eagerly adding, without questioning the source, info that Turks massacred Greeks but insisting and denying that Turks were massacred by Greeks. (Btw, I don't deny any sourced massacre regardless of the perpetrators and victims) From the moment I made this article, Alexikoua started to disrupt the article, he is WP:IDLI from the beginning, very biased he tried to deny it, than shift the blame to others, and finally lowering the death toll from 6,000 to 35 by distorting this source page which does not state that the total killed were 35, it states ""Of the total 177 people (in a refugee camp in Istanbul) responding to a (Ottoman) questionnaire 28 individuals responded that they had family members harmed during the Greek occupation. In total only 35 were reported to be killed, wounded beaten or missing. This is in line with the observations of Toynbee declared that one to two murders were sufficient in driving away the population of a given village"" He misuses this source and claims the total number killed during the events was 35(!). I explained to him,again that in individual cases the number already exceeds 35. Furthermore Toynbee states that in one single village called Hayriye (Khairie) half of the population was killed, according to a Ottoman document it had 250 inhabitants, at another village called Akköy (Akkeu) 60 people were killed, so the death toll of two villages has already exceeded 100. Furthermore the source never states that 35 is the total number of people killed in the peninsula. It is only the result of a questionnaire to 177 people. Furthermore Toynbee states that there were no large scale massacres in one specific region, not in other areas, his words are again distorted. But Alexikoua still insists on distorting the source, I explained it countless times, he still insists, here here here, ], here, here and here. He also amateurishly did original research to deny sourced content. See here, he ignores all other sources and insists on saying ""Toynbee's account about 35 as a total number of reported casualties is the only we have so far""( Which in fact is a lie because it is not Toynbee's account but from the Ottoman questionnaire of 177 people) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gemlik-Yalova_Peninsula_massacres&diff;=prev&oldid;=555135670 Then he does another amateurish original research by multiplying t +I don't have the time to learn how to discuss here. I have repeatedly warned this site of libel. It is not up to me to remove libel, you are the publishers of it. I like wiki, I don't want to take this legal and harm you. But when you are informed of libel, why are you unable to fix it? Why does it keep reappearing? I won't be talking here again, I have a life you know. Do you guys want lawyers and suits and all that? I have repeatedly sent emails about this, with no replies. YOu are taking huge huge huge risks in not doing something to stop the libel. +That was my intention- I picked Twelveheads as a try-out but didn't realise it would be so hard!!! +, 17 May 2008 (UTC) You removed refs and added fact tags. There is good reason to call that act vandalism. 12:10 +Well my apologies, I guess I didn't read all the rules of wikipedia carefully you fucking retarded big long dick nose no culture norwegian piece of shit. +" World Youth Day vs. World Youth Day 2008? Does anyone think that a lot of this information could and should be reproduced on or transferred to the World Youth Day wiki page? This is effectively the ""parent"" article, yet contains no section on criticism. IMHO there should be a single article on ""World Youth Day"" and ""World Youth Day 2008"" should be a sub-section of this article." +. '''If anyone needs to get hold of me (while im on my 24 hour block) either email me or send a message to my talk page, i WILL reply , you might want to put my talk page on your watchlist +Split Would anybody oppose to a splitting of the article into separate sections for each series? talk to wants e-mail +July 2011 Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Buddhist art. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - ™ +Ok. What are these reliable sources? Unregistered Contributor 19:48, June 7, 2011 (UTC) +Scot, this one isn't because of you: Keith Buckner. Care to weigh in on Incarnatus's latest deletion nomination? +You slave driver you! Ouimetoscope. I couldn't go to bed early as planned because of you! -) —  (talk) +Pukata Dishoom! Bi-polar Ass-Low-class S.O.B +I will include your username, and I will include TRP's for the high admin's review, which I do believe should shed some light on this corrupted block. +" Pro-German I think the article should mention that the Proclamation praised the Germans as ""gallant allies"" of the treasonable uprising. (92.3.148.100 )" +is Dare I say Gogo Dodo is a wikihound? +A welcome from Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia Simplified Ruleset How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Enjoy your stay with Wikipedia! +" Then tell me what is factually incorrect about this edit: ""On 24th May 2013 The Daily Mail published an article in which Platell admitted to having watched child pornography for research purposes.""" +P.P.S. Another question (not trying to be a pest) but from what you say above, can I use the pic of her that she has on the front cover of her 1999 autobio which is also discussed in the wikipage article and in my contributions ? I do not want to risk getting a blockl Please clarify. THANKS. !!! +" I'm still waiting on you to cite your source for the allegation that whether something is convex or concave depends on the perspective of the observer (or whether it's outward or inward, or however you want to phrase it). My position is that there is no ambiguity in describing it as simply ""convex."" I don't think the Turner and Godfray articles are correct, and just use a different phrasing. I'm alleging that they're just outright wrong. - " +I hope World of Warcraft dies a long and painful death World of Warcraft sucks the biggest donkey balls on this planet. I cannot express how much I hate this piece of wank other than hoping it is raped, stabbed, drowned, raped again when it's dead, drown it in its own blood from being stabbed. Afterwards, it should be buried in a 150 feet deep pit full of maggots and when they have finished with it, the whole pit should be set alight with 20,000 matches. +There are a whole lot more CSDs than those that appear on the log. Notice that I say some appear on the log, that isn't even the start of it. Probably less than 1% of my CSDs were not perfect. If you'd like, I could go through your edit history and talk page and point out every mistake that you have ever made. You need to read the following policies to start WP:AGF, WP:BITE. In your RFA process, it was pointed out that you too misused the CSD tags here here here here and countless other times. So, before you go WP:BITEing a user who is making good-faith edits and making block threats, you should read the policies a bit more clearly and see that you too are not perfect. +OK, he was prominent in combinatorics. What did he actually discover? 13:23, 17 Aug 2003 (UTC) +Articles User pages are not articles. They are user pages. Spics don't know the difference? Thankyou. +your edits after being adviced to take a holiday Dana, I see you keep posting about the studies at Homeopathy. You were adviced by Jehochman to take a holiday on the homeopathy article and I also did advice you to do that. You should trust more the other editors there to decide what studies are RS for the article: this is picking on one of the sources provided by Scientizzle and dismissing the rest as not valid. This sort of behaviour is starting to piss other editors off and is starting to show on their comments. Please just accept that Scientizzle provided sources to back his statement. this one? wtf? how many times has WP:UNDUE been discussed on those talk pages? Please start accepting that you might be wrong about the studies you bring for addition to the articles. While they might be valid on Berkeley and on conferences and congresses, that doesn't mean that they must be valid for sourcing articles on wikipedia. Please really take that holiday and think about the fact that you could be wrong on some points and pushing too hard against editors that disagree with you +" I don't want you to take sides but I wanted you to know exactly what's going on here. Your suggestion is much appreciated. Thank you, D (Talk?) " +Trevor Hunt Pretty much one of the weirdest people in Roanoke. Obessses over video games and his cats. About two weeks ago, he ran straight into a mailbox and destroyed it. That's pretty much the only reason anybody talks to him. +" I'll just cut and paste what I wrote above then ""It quite clearly says Green Brigade on the green inverted banner beneath the the one that says ""WALK ALONE"" when you look at the pictures on the reference given Here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1363339/Celtic-2-Hamilton-0-Commons-double-fires-Hoops-points-clear-Rangers.html."" " +with ties to the NDP and to a cabinet minister +Basement Fag Hello, could you please explain why you are such a Basement Fag ? If you're not familiar with the term it is someone who lives in their parents basement, has absolutely no friends, uses the computer 99% of the day, and whom enjoys homosexual behavior with other males. This involves receiving and delivering. It has come to my attention you are a giant basement fag and I was wondering how you became such a basement fag ? 216.145.245.75 +Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks all is bollocks Bollocks +Seems I was reverting the 99... ip to the 89... ip. Have seen no evidence of block evasion by the UK ip. +I always start off by assuming good faith, but I can't agree to stay in this discussion and not voice my suspicion (which I think is proved at the 99% confidence level) that the main person bigging up A J Morton's theory here is A J Morton himself. It is my opinion that everybody reading this will agree with me, but they are holding their tongues because they wish to play by the site owners' rules. So since I cannot be true to myself and play by those rules, I will cease participating. (I know I've said that before, but this time I mean it). But please keep an eye on this page...just in case anyone tries to use it for self-promotional reasons. Cheerio and good luck!92.251.255.14 +I think you mistake the Mediterranean countries for europe - have you not been to the highland games - go there and tell them you think there's not enough passion in northern europe - I'm sure they'll demonstrate. A gentler soul - I put it down to too much demonstration under furs, why expend on public demonstrations? | Natter +Please read the links above on what is allowed on Wikipedia, and what is not, and how to be a good wikipedia contributor. - (talk) +I won't be around to discuss further, so whatever you decide is fine. +Is this more common in the UK than in the US? From a cursory glance this system seems to be more common in the UK than in the US, especially outside the military. Is this true? If so it should be noted in the article. 77.7.167.132 +" Removed text from article You're right the history section needs serious work. I have removed it from the article because, I believe, it is a lot of conjecture. It certainly doesn't jive with what I've read on the subject, and goes contrary to information found in referenced articles, for example country dance originating in frontier towns. I would suggest that the country dance section of the folk dance article is read carefully. I would also suggest that careful citing of references in this history section will make it a lot better. What happened to the role of the ""dance master"", and of ""recorded music""? These are both important aspects of the caller's history. It's a little too hit-and-miss for my taste. History The role of the dance caller or cuer came out of necessity, given the origins of folk dance in America, but also in various cultures throughout the world. In America, you can find many examples throughout history of frontier towns (where country dance originated) having people with traditions and dance styles from all over the world. It was customary for people, when they finished work for the day, or when the week was over, to relax and go to a community dance event. Everyone from town came. Having people, however, from all sorts of different cultures caused problems. People from one culture would know a certain type of music, or certain steps; and while there was some overlap in a few cases, the different steps were very confusing to those who didn't know the dances. Also confusing was the fact that even in the case of overlap between cultures, the steps had differing names. Thus, the country dance caller was created out of necessity. Rather than only the dances they knew from each caller, someone was called upon (or more often just came about in an effort to help everyone have a good time) who learned the dances and steps of everyone, and each town created their own list of dance steps. As towns expanded, and people travelled, these new callers (named such because they called out what you were to do next in each dance) were able to learn from each other and each other's styles to the point where, modernly, there is a full Callerlab devoted to maintaining a list of proper square dance calls, integrating new calls and styles of dance, and generally supporting and promoting new ideas in square dance calling, as well as up-and-coming callers." +" Another use of ""a/an"" Compare ""I have a little trouble with my kids"" versus ""I have little trouble with my kids."" In context, the two sentences have virtually opposite meanings, though the difference lies entirely in the presence or absence of the indefinite article. I wonder what mechanism is going on here, and whether it can be mentioned in the article. " +", 9 May 2011 (UTC) Comment Not even sure that we need any qualifier there; is it of any relevance to the section? Talk 21:58" +" Stroke out comment by blocked vandal who posted ""in my name"" in order to throw mud on me. " +This is a joke right? If this isn't a joke how come the list doesn't include the reason the award was given? Its a joke. +Hi Darren, Please go ahead, your help in getting the article approved is much appreciated! +You've got mail +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Curiosity. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. T C " +" Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #28 The 28th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –'''''' | Talk " +" I should not be ""blocked"" for stopping no-consensus page moves that were rejected in an RM. Do not repeat such an allegation again on my talk page. I did not do anything wrong. Block the offender. Regardless, you have no currency here anymore. — ☎ " +Identifying sock puppets I notice you've been very effective at identifying sock-puppets on the obama and I'm curious if you're using IPs or if you have some other tools at your disposal which aren't available to us average editors. No need to divulge trade secrets you don't want to become public which could aid sock-puppet creators, but I wouldn't mind knowing how you identify them, if you do not mind. +" I'm not 100% sure what the practice is on sorting subcategories within their parent category. I just checked, and I noticed that Category:Historic districts in Massachusetts has the pipe character and then ""Districts"" after it, so it sorts into ""Districts"" when you're browsing by letter. That means you have to go to the third or fourth page, or go to the ""D"" listings, to see the historic district subcategory. That sort of makes sense, but it still doesn't get it listed on the first page. The reason I created the subcategory for houses is because there are over 3400 entries in Category:National Register of Historic Places in Massachusetts, which is absolutely huge. I'm using Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser to recategorize the houses into their own subcategory, so that'll organize them somewhat better. Eventually, I'm hoping to set up the infobox generator to check the historic function of the property, so if the function is listed as ""Single Dwelling"" (code ""01A""), it'll automatically put the property into the houses category. Speaking of the infobox generator, I finally had time to implement two of the changes you suggested. I fixed the bug where seconds of latitude were being listed as 60, and I added the "" | coord_parameters = region:US_type:landmark"" parameter. I haven't done the last-name-first suggestion yet. I was hoping to find a way to automatically try to reverse the name to try looking for the last name first, but I haven't fully figured this out yet. (Elkspeak) " +" I looked at this very briefly, inviting users that are in conflict to use the talkpage is a good move. I saw your post on the talkpage as well. I will be offline in about 1/2 hour until Monday (I desperately need a break anyway), so I won't be able to watch this either. But that's okay right? Remember today's mantra? Yesterday's newspaper, yesterday's newspaper, yesterday's newspaper... Thanks dusti, see you next week. | 76 | " +Why do you wanna delete that? i want to tell everybody about Bonjo! you are nasty and cruel! ( ) +" Journey Back To Oz The filmography for this article lists Journey Back To Oz and next to that, in parenthesis, it says ""director"". However, if you look on the ""Journey Back To Oz"" page, it lists someone else as director of that film. Why? Which page is right?" +" Csd survey Results Well, I've posted the results for the -'''' PoppaBalloon'' " +What kind of pud would Columbus feed Dougweller? Vanilla, chocolate, Yorkshire? Please add! +" It sure does. D'oh, by the way, I meant to change my page to the colours you will see it in after you read this message—on the 1st! —  $PЯINGrαgђ  " +Make A ComeBack Make a comeback mate! +" Looks good. I added a brief sentence and a ref for the online/text version of the Today show's report. - talk " +" hi Hi there, I just wanted to know how you know that new page requires categorization? ''' Talk " +I am unable to thank you for your review using the normal method PhilKnight, as I believe my block prevents those links appearing. As it is very early in the morning here, and I haven't yet had my necessary amount of tea to enable proper cognitive function to set in, I will take your sage advice under advisement, and merely strike my appeal comments. - (resonate) +Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. +Yep. The band was called Mavin, and it featured A.J. Trauth (another Disney Channel star). +" If you have nothing to back up your claims, please leave wikipedia. You are obviously the one who is ""ignorant"" to the topic at hand, and obviously have a very strong bias in regards to the topic. " +" Why don't you go fuck yourself, you dipshit? You started with the insults, I'm just not taking crap from a stupid fanboy like you. If you actually looked at my edit history, you'd see that I do contribute articles, and unlike waste-of-space Levy, I also do regular maintenance work here like cleaning up categories and other things admins are supposed to do. Keep replying, I'm not wasting any effort ""improving"" this piece of crap article, but I'll be glad to call you names and point out how stupid you are, all day long. " +C (New York City Subway service) Stop adding so much unnecessary edits to the C train article. I don't know why you're going into more detail about the R32s. It's just a damn train. Nobody cares how often a train breaks down or whatever issues it has. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a Mean Distance Between Failures figure about how often any train break downs or whatever. Besides, the C train and the R32 car articles already mentions the breakdown rates anyway, just in a more subtle way. All it matters is just simply saying that the R32s were moved to outdoor lines to save their aging air compressors from having to work underground all the time. That's it. There's no need to mention what kind of issues the cars themselves have nor how they are/were solved. At least, in my book, your edits to the C train article were either completely over-opinionated, unsourced, or both, and thus, are not needed to mention. It's not like you work for the MTA anyway, so don't speculate about railcar maintenance, inspection or issues. If you don't work for the MTA and therefore, have no experience about the inner workings within the transit agency itself at all, by all means, stay silent, sit back, and relax. +If those East German documents were to be found on a site somewhere could we then link to them from Dr.Winterberg's page ? What do you require ? +" Introduction has been horribly POVed And that's just the beginning of a concerted effort that has badly slanted the entire article. I've been reviewing the history of the introduction and would like you to see how badly it has been degrading. It's really discouraging to see how this honorable woman's memory is being disgraced. I really would rather not be a part of it anymore so please feel free to carry on. 02:06, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) The day after she was killed this was the full article: ""Rachel Corrie (? - March 16, 2003), an American college student, was a member of the International Solidarity Movement protesting Israeli action in the Israel-Palestinian conflict. She was killed by an Israeli bulldozer in Rafah, Gaza. While speaking via a loudspeaker and wearing a red coat, in front of a physician's home which the Israelis intended to bulldoze, Corrie fell down. A bulldozer then ran over her twice. Later, as a group of people gathered, a man was shot and killed by the Israel Defence Forces. Corrie was a senior at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington."" A week after she was killed: ""Rachel Corrie (1979 - March 16, 2003) was an American peace activist who was crushed to death while attempting to block an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) bulldozer in a Gaza Strip refugee camp. Corrie grew up in Olympia, Washington, and graduated from Capital High School. She had been a senior at the Evergreen State College in Olympia, where she studied the arts and international relations. She took a leave of absence to participate in resistance against the IDF as a member of the Palestinian-led International Solidarity Movement (ISM). In her home town, she was known in the local peace movement and an active member of the Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace. Friends describe Corrie as athletically slender with blond hair and thoughtful, intelligent eyes. She played soccer, gardened and loved the poems of Pablo Neruda. She was the daughter of Craig Corrie, an insurance executive, and Cindy Corrie, a school volunteer and flutist."" April 2003: ""Rachel Corrie (1979 - March 16, 2003) was an American peace activist who was crushed to death during the Al-Aqsa Intifada, while attempting to block an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) bulldozer in a Gaza Strip refugee camp. From December, 2003: ""Rachel Corrie (April 10, 1979 - March 16, 2003) was an American activist who was crushed to death when protesting Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip. As a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), she traveled to Rafah during the Al-Aqsa Intifada and tried to block an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Caterpillar D9 bulldozer. She was fatally wounded during this incident."" From April 2004: Rachel Corrie (April 10, 1979 - March 16, 2003) was a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) who traveled to Rafah in the Gaza Strip during the Al-Aqsa Intifada. While protesting the Israeli occupation, she was was fatally wounded when she tried to block an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Caterpillar D9 bulldozer. Her death sparked controversy, with various advocates scrambling to blame it on the IDF, the ISM, ""Palestinian terror"", and on Corrie herself. From October 2004: ""Rachel Corrie (April 10, 1979 - March 16, 2003 was a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) who was run over and killed by an Israeli soldier operated bulldozer while she was protesting Israeli demolitions of Palestinian homes in Rafah in the Gaza Strip. Her death sparked controversy because she was a peaceful protester and a U.S. citizen, yet the U.S. did not conduct or even demand an official investigation and Israel has not held anyone responsible for her death."" Yesterday: ""Rachel Corrie (April 10, 1979—March 16, 2003) was a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) who was killed when she confronted an Israeli soldier-operated bulldozer while protesting Israeli demolitions of Palestinian homes in Rafah in the Gaza Strip. Her death sparked controversy, in part because she was the first Western protester and U.S. citizen to be killed in the Arab-Israeli conflict, and in part because of the highly politicized nature of the conflict itself. Advocates +" Other user's comments Since you didn't heed my warning, let me be absolutely clear, when you do a direct copy-paste of someone else's comment onto this page, including their signature and time, you are basically forging a comment they didn't make on this page. You are allowed to quote them, but you cannot directly copy it. If you want me to fix it for you, I will, but you are not allowed to do that, it is forging someone else's signature and is strictly prohibited.— dαlus Contribs " +REDIRECT Talk:Japanese cruiser Izumi +" Move request I know there has been a section on that, but let's request a move to Meran again. The city belongs to South Tyrol, and the language of the autonomous province of South Tyrol is German (despite its belonging to the state of Italy - just as Québec's language is French, despite its belonging to the state of Canada). This one here even happens to have a German-speaking majority. If I'm rightly informed the Ladin name is Meran too. I don't even see where there could be a possible discussion. - That is, unless ""Merano"" would be the established English name, as Cologne is for Köln. In that case: it's the English wikipedia. But while I don't really know, I don't think this is the case. And in that case: it's not the Italian wikipedia.131.159.0.47 " +Promoter of left-wing bias It's traditional to be gracious when people leave, I owe you no such indulgence. Your edits have been at the heart of the problem of Wikipedia, a blind adherence to left-wing orthodoxy. Good riddance. +Zambo has nothing to do with mixed people Delet. Zambo and its derivatives Sambo etc are African in origin from the African surname Samba or Sambo and Sambou/Zambo. They are African surnames meaning one who gives comfort or comfort giver. They have nothing to do with mixed people and the word certainly does not originate from Spain or Portugal. 86.176.170.210 +X-Men Origins: Wolverine I put in the bit about Deadpool dying - the only thing I saw in the credits was Styker being arrested by some soldiers. Are there more scenes after this? Or is it part of the different ending to each reel?86.41.143.219 +", 5 March 2009 (UTC) That wasn't an attack (ad hominem), that was constructive criticism. There's a difference. ""You're an idiot,"" is an ad hominem attack. It is a baseless insult with no constructive intention. ""Rubbish"" is an ad hominem attack. There is nothing constructive other than an insult of another contributors work. Telling fiddle they he or she has an ""arrogant obtuse attitude"" was constructive with the intention of advice on how to better deal with new posters. ""Instead of posting rubbish"" is both an arrogant and insulting statement. It did nothing to help me create a better article, OR give reasons why the SKK article was being deleted. ""Rubbish"" is not an objective criteria. ""This article has already been posted & debated"" is. Of course this fact never was brought up until after the discussion was well out of hand. Second, you cannot with any intellectual honesty characterize what I posted as ""vandalism."" My repeated intention was to make a sincere contribution of a topic that I felt is important. I was more than happy to discuss the merits of the article as evidenced by my fruitless attempt to use the ""hangon"" tag. I literally barely had time to type a few words before the article was again deleted with absolutely zero discussion or valid justification. I encourage ALL parties to go back and look at how this played out. There was NO discussion other than threats & a dismissive suggestion to go play in your own sandbox. Is this really how you want to run Wiki? It is, after all, your playground, and you get to make the rules. That's fine with me. Maybe you really have dealt with too many vandals, and were quick to lump me in with whatever hooligans you may be used to dealing with. If I really wanted to be a vandal, I could easily use an ip proxy to keep posting & causing trouble here. There would be little that you could do about it, but that is not who I am. I am an honest contributor who took exception to fiddles arrogant and insulting attitude. We can disagree on that assessment, but don't expect me to get on my knees with some ""gee, I'm sorry"" obsequiesness just so I can join the cool kids club. My advice to you is maybe you, fiddle & hiber might reconsider your knee jerk reactions & at least assume positive intent (see ""community"" heading above) & try a discussion that does not start with something along the lines of ""your work is rubbish."" 16:42" +Also regarding the titles: they are provided in English and Modern High German, both languages unknown to the rulers (at least in the early days). It would be nice to have them in OHG/MHG as appropriate if someone has the ability and time, unfortunately I have neither. 138.162.128.53 +215000421&oldid;=214990492] Uncivil posts or personal attacks on Talk:Race and intelligence [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARace_and_intelligence&diff;= +2009 (UTC) Fixed 03:36, 8 June +Uncited works Don't remove good examples simply because they were not cited as such, by putting them here, WE are citing them for the first time! As for those who insist that they are Wikipedia know-it-alls, probably because they haven't been laid for a while (or at all!), I suggest you take a bath and brush your teeth more often a mouthwash will also help. 220.244.175.139 free speech is in the constitution +" Battery The battery for the 60D is not the same as the ""2 digit line, (such as the 30D or 50D). It uses the same battery as the 5D and 7D. Although for such a short article with such little information, this bit of information seems unimportant. In addition to this line sounding like nonsense, ""ISO with both steps 1 f-stop steps and 1/3 f-stop steps"" it is also inaccurate. This is not a change from the 50D. The 50D also has the option of either full stop increments or 1/3 stop increments for ISO settings." +Come back, you BUTTHURT TURD DOCTOR Where the heck have you gone? +Copyrigh Violation by editor SarekOfVulcan Your +" I think it's OK. the Duck " +"/08) The definition of ""injury"" certainly comes into play. I happen to have FOP. My jaw fused likely due to a dental procedure. My knee (which happened AFTER my jaw) was due to an incident in Hawaii involving a minibus with a rental car company. My right leg is now going through an episode that does not correlate with any remembered injury or strain. (steve 5/27" +I've revoked talk page access, for a number of reasons, including concerns that you are IP hopping. +Foreign teacher recruitment: http://www.plugintoyours.com +you win Obama Ok, you don't like the current size of 10. Just put it back to the old version, which says 12. A 12 lawyer firm is not that small. Furthermore, you have no references that say it's small. The old version might not be completely correct, but it's close enough. +Angell Center picture That picture is pretty interesting. I'm a current student and this is a picture of the reverse angle taken from the walkway between Yokum and Feinberg: I think I might upload it as Creative Commons and add it to the State University of New York at Plattsburgh page. +" That, and rollback. ) Thanks for the quick response. Murray " +"== re: Webscriptions article edits == Could you explain why you added the claim that the Tor issue was resolved (as well as mentioning DAW as a Webscriptions publisher)? I can only assume this was some kind of hoax...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I'm not active nor interested in helping this site anymore, but as of the day of the posting, both publishers had lists of books on webscriptions. So from my point of view, consider it a with that as the accessdate= field. I may make a rare joke in content when the random circumstances align, but not at the expense of a point of fact. I'm well over 7,000 articles edited, so I'm hardly into making things up. Arnold Bailey (owner-operator)& webscriptions is an independent (Of Baen) businessman in the south somewhereone of the Carolina's. Baen is a NYC region publisher. Why would you assume a businessman isn't trying to improve his sales by increasing product carried, floor trade, etc. // nkB " +" This page would merit its own heading section in the Chernobyl disaster article, which would be somewhat lengthy and unreadable, so IMO it merits its own page as a ""see also""/main article outlink from that page. " +List of twin towns and sister cities in Indonesia Thank You For You Good Contributions On My First Article. +" Popular Culture? What is ""pop culture"" about Richard Francis Burton...?" +I agree. Also, just having an article listing a bunch of dates is not encyclopedic. That is, e.g., for a fan-site to provide (which then could be quoted in a wiki article if necessary).'''', talk'' +Hello, just introducing myself... I have just joined our group. I am Terese Bird and my username is tbirdcymru! Pleased to meet you! +If you like marshmallows then contact me.IMPORTANT: DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ANYONE CAN CHANGE IT. GET OFF IT NOW!!!!! +" It's a loaded history for sure. Try Tel Zacharia with an ""A"". I've been looking for ancient maps on it but all the books are for purchase. Zero's right about the sources, though logic would say most of them rely on solid reference because there doesn't seem to be a reason to move Tel-Zecharia. There may be a dispute over its placement in academic references themselves. We'll see soon. " +. I also moved your barrel def and ref to the Anatomy article where all the other points of the horse defs are. +Bhtbby fhy Why do you help that 13 year old she's too young to understand wikipedia she should be kicked off +" Note this part ""As most recently defined (Decker-Walters, et al., 1993), free-living gourds that occur in Texas are classified as C. pepo ssp. ovifera var. texana. Similar, free-living plants that occur in the U.S. beyond Texas (Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana) are placed in C. pepo ssp. ovifera var. ozarkana."" There still seems to be disagreement on what to call and the relations between pepo, texana, and fraterna. That 1993 ref is 20 years. I'm looking for newer stuff. " +Hello, re your edit of Mt. Hood, you misspelled 'Dan Howitt' name. It would be briefer to have the hours of the time in numbers rather than spelled out, could you have suggested an edit in the discussion section prior to doing one?, the text in the picture was fine before.... +We will wear either the ABUs or ACUs only. The marines never allow us to wear their uniforms. Mostly likely though we will start wearing only the ABUs but our body armor and gear will be ACU pattern. The only people now that wear ACUs are people that are imbedded with the army (IE TAC P's). Keith +" WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition Note: Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article TALK2ME " +I've contested the speedy deletion, and I've renamed the page to Pope John Paul II Elementary School. +I've written two articles for Guiding Light actors: Larry Gates (H.B. Lewis) and Don Stewart (Mike Bauer). +" QUIT EDITING CHICAGO MED YOU ARE SO STUPID, HOW CAN SOMEONE POST ON HERE AND GET IT VERFIED WITHOUT YOU CHANGING IT, INFORMATION POSTED ON HERE THATS CITED IS NOT COPYRIGHT. ARE YOU FROM AMERICA U IDIOT GET A LIFE. STOP RUINGING CHICAGO MEDS PAGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.255.230 " +" Please slow down When using AWB you are still expected to add human intelligence to the programme's powers. You labelled Gawley as a stub, and uncategorised, and an orphan. In fact it is obvious, if you look at it, that it is a disambiguation page. The fact that it starts off ""Gawley may refer to"" is a good clue. The only appropriate tag to add was . Please be more careful. Thanks. " +":::Um I have read a great deal about this. What belongs here is a short precis of the material, not anything more, and the debate about ""most likely"" is far more than is warranted in this particular article, which is precisely why there is so much on this talk page. Bringing it down to a reasonable precis is the best course as far as I can tell. Cheers - and try not to condescend so overtly in the future. " +" I can't understand Jeffro77's first objection. Nowhere do I see a claim in the text that anyone other than the committee are the authors of their translation. The committee do announce explicitly that a privilege was granted to them. They are not thanking men for this. We have to adopt a scrupulously NPOV in quoting the donor of that privilege. It is a notable item of Jehovah's belief that all the books of the Bible have a single author in contrast to mainstream Christianity that acknowledges a number of authors at different times. But I choose to say ""a heavenly Author, not the heavenly Author, to avoid getting into loaded and POV consideration of that Author being unique or not. Capitalising the ""A"" in Author is, I think, a reasonable concession to the same convention of capital ""G"" for God, and ""Author"" is true to the source. In case you still disagree, let's invite more voice(s) to help. To Jeffro77's second objection, it is clear that Jeffro77 takes ""inspired"" to mean ""divinely informed"" and that Jeffro77 deduces from known dates of publication, that Jehovah's Witnesses include their own translation NWT among the 1 300 or 1 800 uninspired ones. I have no argument against that logic. However it may be too near WP:SYN because the Jehovah's Witnesses may not intend or even be aware of that argument's logic. Unless someone provides an source that says explicitly that the NWT is among the uninspired translations, we may not generate our own criticism this way. However the categorical claim by Jehovah's Witnesses about a remarkably large number of translations on which various faiths rely is notable in our survey of criticism of the NWT. Can this be said better? " +Neither was your mum, when I had sex with her +You are wrong again. There is no talking to you. You are incredibly ignorant. It will not be called an EP. Any attempts to re-classify it, will be REVERTED. Have a nice day. +HI everybody i have a question.....i love jake bye +Fuck off! Fuck off! +, as they are often quite useless and wrong. +" You're right—the block is not so effective when there's that much IP hopping. I don't think I can issue a rangeblock without checking to see how much collateral damage there would be to non-vandal users in the range; someone like , who has checkuser privileges, might be a better person to ask. Or you could go to WP:ANI for potentially faster service. ) Thanks for keeping a lookout; some of the vandalism is quite subtle, so more difficult to notice. (talk)(contribs) " +I have no clue what happened here, it appears that my username is blocked indefinitely, and the blocked IP range doesn't match mine.... so I put this here due to alison being retired. +Please refrain yourself from changing the genres, as you did on such pages as Loud, if you continue to do so it could be seen as vandalism and your account may be blocked. +IMDB has false information the person who edited his bio gave the wrong height. he IS 6' tall he's said it in radio interviews on his tv show its even in his own book. stop changing it i'm sick of coming in here and cleaning it up. in fact im also going to go over to imdb and report the person who gave false info on Criss. +" Thank you! By the way I didn't intend my ""neutral"" as an ""oppose in disguise."" Best of wishes. " +Jews in Wikipedia Add yourself to Jews on Wikipedia65.27.38.203 +PMK1|PMK1]] 05:44, 1 June +Hello everyone I am in my holiday and I have been thinking about Wikipedia in the last few days. First of all, I see you guys deleted my page. 1. User:Fanatic of Football is my little cousin who I talked about Wikipedia in the past days, he liked the idea, and he decided to edit. I advise him to read the rules before. He did, and as you see in all of his edits he improved Wikipedia, he did not attacked or deleted from Wikipedia! Why did you block him? and delete all of his creative contributions!? 2. I have been thinking about the standard offer and I will take it if this is really mandatory, but please I want you guys to act correct Wikipedia:Civility and realise that I am here to improve Wikipedia like you guys, and as well you can see this from the amount of pages I have created and from my edits. Thank you!185.56.90.70 +Please leave a link or the reply also on my talk page; that way I can reply faster. +" You'll be hard-pressed to determine the origin of the ""grudges"" you are imaging here, for I'd no contact with Orderinchaos at all prior to the filing of this report…unless you believe I meant to retaliate against him for opposing Elonka's second RfA, which I foolishly supported? Only the socking and accompanying dishonesty bothers me, otherwise he seems an intelligent and capable administrator, with whose socks, incidentally, I generally agreed. Do you find it inconceivable that anyone would aim to ensure the integrity of the project, without some nefarious underlying motive? " +re yes i agree with this it seems fair +" Clarification on Wikipedia naming standards Hi Kohikoi, You just left a message on my talkpage where you immediately threatened to block me out of the blue instead of a friendly suggestion or attempt to discuss/investigate. I would like to remind you that Wikipedia:Administrator_Code_of_Conduct | Wikipedia admin code of conduct}} guidelines specifically state... threatening a user with an inappropriate block is just as bad behavior as actually making that block admins should never use their admin abilities to intimidate others To deal with your concerns though. From my tandpoint I just corrected a breach of Wikipedia naming standards that appear politically motivated. However,you just suggested the current version of these pages are the result of a long-standing consensus between several users. Do you have evidence of this consensus? (i.e Where exactly is it reported on Wikipedia?) As far as I can tell the page for naming conventions of Greek and Turkish named places specifically states... ""This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained as a historical archive. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus has become unclear. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you should seek broader input via a forum such as the proposals page of the village pump."" Furthermore, I have to ask why is there suddenly a special page only for Greek/Turkish naming conventions in the first place? The standards proposed on that page appear to directly contridict broader Wikipedia naming standards which state... Use modern English names for titles and in articles. Historical names or names in other languages can be used in the lead if they are frequently used and important enough to be valuable to readers, and should be used in articles with caution. I'm a a hotheaded newb so perhaps I'm missing something here. Any insight would be appreciated " +" It's alright, we all begin as mimics. lolz! I'm sure you'll figure out how to tweak your layout soon. Cheers! — Speak! " +Warning Please stop. If you continue being a Jackass, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +You do realize the lists come from the same location and it has changed very slightly since I answered the above questions. The point is still the same, the picture is not a decoration, (talk). If the book wasn't discussed in the article you'd be right, the image would just be a decoration that happens to show what she looks like. The fact that the book is discussed in the article means including the image is fair use. Since the image can be used on the article, it's not merely decoration. Since it is useable in the article, including it to ALSO illustrate Browne herself is a beneficial aspect of these circumstances. +" I'll say. The lead sentence itself has exploded in verbosity since the FAC. Old: ""Chinese Indonesians or Indonesian Chinese are Indonesians of Chinese – particularly Han – descent, who emigrated to Indonesia or the former Dutch East Indies colony; this migration was done both directly and through Maritime Southeast Asia."" Current: ""Chinese Indonesians, previously known as the Indonesian Chinese, are Indonesian descended from various Chinese ethnic groups – particularly Han – descent; this includes both those who immigrated to Indonesia or the former Dutch East Indies colony. This migration was done both directly and through Maritime Southeast Asia.""  —  " +Hello I just thought I'd let you know that I say your article Architectural Science Review in the New Articles listThe information is presented clearly and is easy to understand. However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article does not contain in-line citations, and so doesn't follow Wikipedia style guidelines. It would be great if you could also improve the related article List of academic journals. +Sounds good to me. What do you think of the first few states I have played around with here?68.39.100.32 +" unblock|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#When_blocking_may_not_be_used to quote directly: Disputes Administrators must not block users with whom they are engaged in a content dispute; instead, they should report the problem to other administrators. An exception is made when dealing with unsourced or poorly sourced contentious biographical material about living persons. Administrators may enforce the removal of such material with page protection and blocks, even if they have been editing the article themselves. (See the BLP policy.) Cool-down blocks Brief blocks solely for the purpose of ""cooling down"" an angry user should not be used, as they inevitably serve to inflame the situation. you had no right to block me for something said on my talk page. please take your vendetta somewhere else. i made a comment two months after the fact with nothing in between i don't see how this warrants a block and it appears to violate wikipedia's blocking policy." +PS: Oh yes and I see that foul bio box has a reference here - why don't you vote to get rid of it here . | talk +Jobsworth killjoy Enough said. +In their early CDs they are credited as Anthems for Insubordinates. I guess later they just changed their names. On other CDs like Shut Your Mouth and Open Your Eyes they call them A Fire Inside. Does that make any difference to anyone? +AfD Help Hey, I also have a deletionist after one of my pages. Can you take a look at the AfD and see what you think. Dekker Dreyer Thanks. +Hello Dmcdevit, it seems Ryan has given up trying to explain his actions in banning me from race and intelligence, he also has coincidentally archived his talk page apparently to cover up this controversy (but that is his right I suppose, but only makes his case weaker). Anyway, what recourse do I have here? T +Cholas and Vijayanagar empires are worth the mention. Vijayanagar can be mentioned for its temple architecture and Hampi (a world heritage site). Cholas can be mentioned for their detailed record keeping in the temples of Tamil Nadu. +" I'm just curious as to whether we have any statistics on what people who search the term ""Lowell"" by itself are actually looking for. My assumption (could well be wrong) is that a majority of those who search ""Lowell"", just that one word, are looking for Lowell, Massachusetts. It is by far the most populous and best-known ""Lowell"" in the United States. Aside from several very small towns that share the name, are any of the other people or places on this disambiguation page commonly referred to as just ""Lowell""? And if so, does their overall notability rival that of the city in Massachusetts? Not trying to draw any conclusions here; I just want to know whether there's any consensus or strong feelings one way or the other on the disambig, and if so, what support there is for one view or the other." +" Thanks! Works like a charm. drop me a line (note: not a bot!) " +" NSW cricketer photo poll Right, I've set it up. I made some adjustments to my technique, so hopefully it's better. Many thanks again in advance '''' ([[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll]]'') " +Sign your message with four tildes (~). It's not that hard. +Thanks for agreeing. (T - C) +" new thread at WP:AN that relates to you. I want to be clear that I'm not ""coming after you"" but I have some serious concerns about the wisdom of the new policies with regard to arbitration enforcement. " +Hi girlie, you miss the turd doc? +" ""Vandalism""? Sorry, mister, but I haven't conducted vandalism a single time, and ALL of my edits so far (notify me if any of them are not contributive or factually correct) are legit edits. ""Fuck off"" was because of the overwhelming amount of obvious facts being asked for ""citation"", and was NOT meant for ANY specific user. Is Wikipedia this full of bull (and I'm using a euphenism because I'm sure you'll refer to ""assume good faith"" as soon as you see me using my own rhetoric) I'm bothered by bull, so I'm just here, nicely removing and being bold about editors screwing up badly. Ironically, I could write some edit summary to this edit like ""fuck, things sure are fucked up pretty fuckily around fucky here"" regarding the dumb in the fact that I had not attacked ANYONE SPECIFICALLY! Give me one evidence where I had mentioned a person, or a revision? Oops, there's none. This is the bull I'm talking about. Please, there are better things to worry than to ban some people because of some ""behind the scene"" metadata with a little cuss and a preposite.. Hint: the ""fuck off"" was towards the MANNERS and the piece of """" template, not ANY person or any group of editors. Tell me why all my effort in writing good articles, using proper punctuation and spelling, and using a Wikipedia-like style is overseen by admins who only look at some ""edit summaries"" who nobody really cares about? [talk] " +How about if we wait a week in which I promise not to edit any pages and then if I keep my prmise, we can set a date for the block to be lifted at that point. +Do I need to ask more than once to be left alone? +Read the above if you are a sane human being. +more links and add sources |wikify= |merge= |cleanup= remove copyrighted content |expand= |disambiguation= |stubs= |update= |npov= |verify= rewrite with notability and history |other= pictures of their skis +" ALSO - I am completely lost to your logic here where you say, ""If you think that such acts are indeed racist, then you are simply a racist..."" WHAT?!! so, on ANZAC day, or the Holocasut rememberance day if other people were to carry NAZI flags or Japan Emprial flags and I thought that to be racist, then by your reasoning then I am racist... excuse me, did anyone else get that? YES I DO NOT like some cultures - namely NAZI racist culture... that does not mean I am racist to NAZI's.. does it? I mean, that is what Rcnaderlori is suggesting... unbeleiveable!! I am afraid of a culture where I would be gassed if I were jewish, or a culture where I will have my lips cut off for wearing lipstick (Iran) or a culture where I will be murdered by my father for having a relationship and dishonouring the family etc... some things are evil - NAZISM gassing of Jews and Islamic beheadings of Infidels - yes that is truely evil... I will not tolerate gas chambers or beheadings, never, its not that I am afraid, It is that nature herself has imprinted on my mind the idea of what is good, ie protesting rape and hatred for white people, and what is bad, gaschambers, beheadings and gang rape/" +Former Porn Star turned P.I. PAUL BARRESI conduct investigations on behalf of dozens of Hollywood celebrities including: TOM CRUISE http://intouchweekly.hollywood.com/2007/11/hollywoods_biggest_rumor_answe.php SYLVESTER STALLONE http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/LegalCenter/story?id=1625097&page;=1 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER http://www.laweekly.com/news/deadline-hollywood/arnold-pellicano-and-politics/9626/ EDDIE MURPHY http://www.hollywoodinterrupted.com/archives/the_bagman.phtml BARRY BONDS http://thebiglead.com/?p=95 Since the dawning of the Internet, gossip can be disseminated around the world with the simple push of a button. Our First Amendment gives us the right to start a blog and publish whatever we wish to say about anybody. It is much easier to be critical than correct. The freedoms we enjoy in the U.S are wonderful but they are also very dangerous. To create an unfavorable impression, it is not necessary that what is said be true. The damage is done in the mere telling of it. No one has felt that sting more than I. Last year, the Mail On Sunday falsely reported Andrew Morton paid me to dig up dirt on Tom Cruise, which could not be further from the truth. The editors finally got around to making the correction. http://www.nypost.com/seven/12232007/gossip/pagesix/hedge_fund_sex_tales_denied_292392.htm http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/dmstandard/article.html?in_article_id=499166∈_page_id=1766 Having worked in porn and mainstream film and TV, I stand uniquely perched on the scaffold connecting the two biggest industries in Hollywood The movie industry and the sex industry, which follows the movie industry like the moon. Words can be lethal especially for a person in the public eye. +RE: Jafaican Clearly you have personal issues with my political standpoint, stemming from your extreme leftwing location on the political map. I advise you that I do not tolerate extremeism, nor do I much care for abusive left wing threats. Keep yourself to yourself and stay away form me, please. 1, I am not racist. 2, There is a link to my talk page on every page on which I make Discussion contributions. 3, Be advised I will not tolerate agression, even in the left wing variety. +No, I got incorrectly banned, which is why it was lifted. And your whole tone is very sarcastic and rude, not to mention you are trolling this page. Stop it. +Hello Everyone Hi everyone,this is Phil Knight`s brother account ) +" Few questions There is something I have been wondering; is the name of the Tsuna Sawada article okay? Shouldnt it be Tsunayoshi Sawada or Tsunayoshi ""Tsuna"" Sawada? By the way, I think the article would need to replace the infobox image to show more the head of Tsuna. " +" Remove – Entire article is of questionable notability. There also appears to be an agenda here, being pushed, often through tag-team and uncivil retorts, on this talk page. Wiki seems to turn more into 4chan and less from an encyclopedia through the manipulation of ""not censored"" rhetoric, each day. I'm waiting for a photo of a ""sheep shagger"" to appear on Welsh or Scottish article, under the guise of ""notability"". Some editors here have serious pro-gay COI/POV issues and need to step back, especially given that this is supposedly a heterosexual activity also and straight people are being accused of ""homophobia"" out of turn. Why is the solo female fister a cartoon, and the male fister a photo, for a start? Not very neutral. Why does there even need to be a photo, when all the article needs is a description – I mean, it's hardly rocket science, and that guy hardly has a ""rocket"" worth shouting about? You don't need a photo on how to boil eggs, so why one here? Again, it's anti-Wiki content that brings the entire project into disrepute with regards to making it less accessible to kids, more agenda/politically motivated, more pornographic, less educational, detrimental to every other article/contributor who wants to see Wiki develop. Sadly, it is forced issues like this that lead to conflicts regarding discrimination. Gays complaining about homophobia if the photo is removed are hypocrites, when they themselves use ""not censored"" as an excuse to discriminate against younger readers. Age discrimination is no less prevalent than sexuality discrimination. Photos such as this are what lead to the Foundation considering an ""image filter"" recently. I'm pro-LGB (-T) but I also believe in ""behind closed doors"". And I disagree with anyone who says kids won't look it up. When I was young kids looked ""dirty words"" up in the dictionary. Now the internet is here, and images like this only serve to corrupt young minds. Let's put it this way: because of ""no legal threats"", no LGBT members stand a chance of forcing a legal discrimination matter out of this. COPPA stands a better chance, as child protection is of far greater importance than censorship, where there is limited parental control. WikiKamaSutra anyone?  [Chat • RFF] " +"Why should I ""assume good faith"" from someone adding anti-Semitic lies to an article? Your obvious ignorance on the subject is not an excuse." +some shred of credibility, we will not admit they we wrong even though they clearly were. We take our cues from Jimmy, who decided that a liar could continue being credible +in Czech. One day me caught and took to ZOO and in i ZOO now i very happy live. Nothing i no must do, food give me under nose and i can editing Wikipedia! +Blocked by association with editing articles, which may have been vandalized by others in the past... amusing to say the least. Again, I am not evading block. I did have an account a while ago, which is not blocked, but I won't reveal it in public as this account was intended to be a clean slate; I can email you about it if you want. It could take me less than a minute to change my IP and create a new one, but then again, I am not here for the drama. If there is anything you need to know, just ask. +" Thanks George! Signing off just now, but it's a barnstar for civility in your direction next day P see you soon. Until then, [talk] " +Hey I smell another Jap whaitewash conspiracy, check out the Ainu (people) page, there's not enough maudlin support for these people after what the japs have done to them, hence it is your holy task to seek the truth and disclose, pronto! +" Admin Note this is clearly the same person making the same vandalism edits including reverting cluebot. Clearly not here for good purposes, 24 hours is warranted. TravellingCari " +"Indeed it is becoming increasingly apparent that the ""mass migrations"" of the past were myths - hahaha, what an idiot you are Wobble because there is nothing claiming this or supporting this. The Bronze Age and following migrations haven't been proven/disproven you fool and there is nothing becoming increasingly apparent as to if they didnt happen. Get a life, honestly. " +A better class of...vandal? +I can possibly see this information being added under the Reception section which someone will probably make as the game comes closer to being released. +" Oh, and Wiki's ""mediation"" is a complete JOKE." +Answer: This page is not released in polish. Try to remake to polish. Remember about translations (tables→tabelki) +August 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bwordpress\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert something that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! 160.91.231.124 If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice. 160.91.231.124 +IM IN YOUR AREA I'm going to find you and when I find you I will teach you how to swim. +" Trio Joubran A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Trio Joubran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. (talk contribs friendly) " +We don't need such a source. It's enough to additionally show that laws prohibiting these actions exist if indeed you believe common sense doesn't indicate that fact on its own. +LOL Charging you with burning my britches isn't a personal attack. +John Sanford That would be because copyright-violating articles are deleted and as such wouldn't display. I'm an admin, so I can see them - I'm not sure if you are. Feel free to ask any other admin to look at the deleted revisions. +ANYWAYS, i'm not going to continue here. +Welcome to Wikipedia, but please read Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. +I added her right. mango +" 'Go suck your mudda' Why did you undo my post on Underage Drinking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.27.129 2015-06-06T10:10:55‎ Because you were attacking ClueBot, which we all know and love. — (talk | contribs) " +":You can ignore, Jossi took care of it and showed me where to go to learn how to archive. Thank you though. Talk " +" The link to ""Useful Idiot"" would seem to be a decidedly non-neutral point of view. Unless anyone objects soon, I'll remove it." +Image Tagging for Image:AlGoreHowardDean.jpg Moved from my talk page. —aco Thanks for uploading Image:AlGoreHowardDean.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. +Sue, do take symbolic action as soon as u read my above message as it is totally unacceptable. Best regards. Bye, till tomorrow. +FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS FUCK VUVUZELAS +HELLO! HELLO! I would expect a bit more harsh treatment for this drink which single-handedly ruined the largest country in the world! You are mostly praising it (purest, this good, that good, no hangover) instead of condemning it in strong terms. Vodka is easily the biggest curse ever seen in history, it makes people drink their brains away and halts all progress or human effort. Why there is no mention of Gorbachev trying to ban it and how the USSR fell apart? +Barney & Barney & Friends This is very strange. This is how the disambiguation article was on April 19 as 131.162.154.31 restored the deleted material. The next edit by Computerjoe with VP here is very strange as VP inserted the material from Barney & Friends. Also neither of the IP's (68.60.182.219 & 70.241.90.252) in the summary had edited the Barney article. Now look at this where I roll back the Barney & Friends article. Note that the two IP's are the same as that listed by VP. (Talk) +Ok, i take your point. I just don't see why you guys have to be so gay about a page like this?! You aren't the brittania encyclopedia, mostly from what i can see you're a bunch of mugs with nothing better to do then write silly articles about nothing in particular. On the other hand this article is, in my opinion, an interesting and hopefully expanding drinking organisation. We are using wikipedia to spread the word about our idea and a bunch of loser gimps are trying to stop purely because they have nothing better to do. +" I will definitely wait for your answer. I'll think about it too. I also think that we have to know the ""Why"" of its bad success and then try to change it in our own favour.  (zootalk) " +My thoughts exactly it makes sense that if both an irresistible force immovable object exist then they would not be able to measure each others existence and would have no effect on each other. +GA Sweeps invitation Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you. We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or and we'll be happy to help. Happy editing! (talk • contrib) +Lucille Ball I have reverted an edit you made to the Lucille Ball article. The edit you made constitutes WP:vandalism. Continuing to edit in this fashion will cause you to be banned from being able to futher editing on wikipedia. I hope that this is a one time incident! +, . These two could be reliable sources. +I am a very efficient person, who can steer the ape +Great work, and timely with the FL review going on, to get pics for 3 NHLs missing pics, and to get 3 improved pics. I have to be more disciplined like you in uploading the pics I have taken, both in doing NHLs right away and in working at backlog for NRHPs. I have pics for a few scattered NHLs (none in NY) and one or two hundred NRHPs, gathering dings in my hard drive. The FL review seems to be going fine, happily. +" Well, technically speaking, the original author of this article is not the subject. And while it is discouraged, people with conflict of interest may edit articles, as long as it in neutral. And finally, yes, if it's sourced, and relevant it can be in here.  said " +" Book: The Fear Babe ""Only In Death"" removed an attempt to create a section on the well-selling book covering Vani's tactics. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vani_Hari&diff;=prev&oldid;=695670915 I propose that it should be included as a section since a published book is different from the other forms of media and criticism, per Wikipedia's manual of style. I also request that if OID is sincere, s/he should suggest the alternative wording they prefer for a mention of the book's existence as valid, published criticism of Hari. " +A19 bridge . Are you sure the A19 bridge is within the City?. Regardless of the parish boundaries, I would say that the A19 bridge is outside the City. It overlooks Hylton to the East, but it is well outside the City itself. Bob +Shut the fuck up you wannabe cholo scum. +Edit morocco and tunisia Im here to talk about those edits. Moroccan edit is unexplainably bad. Information is false. Moroccans and other north africans belong to a group called metatids along with somalian, ethoipians, egyptians etc. All people whom are light skinned no matter what race asain caucasian whatever get a tan in sunlight due to lack of melanin in skin cells thats simple science everyone learns that in grade school. The tunisian one no matter what you say I dont care its 'cited' it is contradictory and false information. There are numerous other studies refuting theirs and the piece appears biased. As someone who is half tunisian blood I know a lot about this subject north africa and have read multiple reports refuting and proving how wrong outlandish the persons writing on those generally are. +hey, why did you revert? +" More refs of interest on situations where the state doesn't have a monopoly on violence: USMC Small Wars Manual, 1940ed. A classic how-to manual for those little problems that requre sending in the Marines. Still widely read; on the mandatory reading list for USMC officers. Much of the book is about re-establishing a state monopoly on violence. There are sections on ""disarmament of populations"", and setting up a constabulary and a military government. USMC Small Wars Manual, new rev. (to appear) With all the small wars lately, the Marines are updating their manual. It's not out yet. ""The Modern Nation State and Regimes of Violence: Reflections on the Current Situation"" . A recent paper on the subject by Kossler, a German academic writing for a Japanese audience. Pages 15-18 have a good summary of the history of the concept - Hobbs, Weber, Marx, etc. He views the ""monopoly on violence"" as the result of the consolidation process which turned Europe from a collection of feudal regions into nation-states. Rather than trying to define ""legitimate"" violence, Kossler speaks of the ""public dimension of violence"". Kossler also sees an economic dimension: ""The guarantee of sound market conditions therefore is also dependent on the effective exercise of sovereignty by the state."". After covering the classic position, Kossler points out that non-state actors mess it up: ""The post-9/11 situation forces important and disconcerting qualifications on this rather conventional picture. This goes back to the fact that an act of outrageous violence emanating from a non-state source which cannot be defined in territorial terms has been interpreted as an act of war, to be countered by military means, including the targeting of certain state-bounded territories, such as Afghanistan and later Iraq."" He also mentions the rise of ""networked organizations"", including crime cartels that operate across borders, as challenging state monopolies on violence. In 2004, George Will wrote, about the US-Iraq war, ""The first task of the occupation remains the first task of government: to establish a monopoly on violence."" Because that effort wasn't successful, there's a lot of later material on what happens when the state can't establish a monopoly on violence. See also Arab Spring. Please read some of these and contribute to the article. Thanks. " +1880 no the army was formed in 2002 by America, the 1880 army under the Monarchy was something else a differnt unit alltogether diffirent uniform,HQ etc you cant call them the same army. Afghanistan had northern alliance and Taliban two armies in the country,There is no National Afghan Army before +-Thank God, or we might still hear more of his crap. +" The first template is built upon hiddenStructure (see Wikipedia:Don't use hiddenStructure). That's how it harms wikipedia. The proposed solution is hardly better, though, for it makes use of hiddenStructure, too. See Template:Infobox Arcade Game for a template that works exactly the way a KOF character template would have to work, only that it does not make use of hiddenStructure. elias.hc " +Edits on David Choi reverted Dear IP user 60.52.74.7, It seems that one of your recent edits, the one on David Choi, is non-constructive and may be tantamount to vandalism. Please note that the edit has been reverted and removed. Please note that Wikipedia is a source for research and project and that all Wikipedians (people with an account on Wikipedia) work towards a goal - making constructive edits and keeping reliable and useful information. We fight against vandalism strongly, and you might be blocked if you continue with the non-constructive edits. Thank you for using Wikipedia. +" | decline = I see that you have concerns that well-sourced critical content about a school is given too much weight in an article about that school. I see no reason to doubt that your concerns about that are sincere. I equally have no doubt that the dissent from that view on the part of other editors is sincere. As the administrator assessing your unblock request, it is no part of my job to assess the validity of either of those evidently sincere opinions. It is, however, my task to assess how you have handled the disagreement. You have refused to consider that there may be genuine, good-faith disagreement, but have instead repeatedly thrown accusations of malice against those who have expressed opinions contrary to yours. You have wikilawyered and twisted and twisted to try to show that you are RIGHT. You have treated Wikipedia as a battleground, where the way to deal with anyone you disagree with is to relentlessly attack them, not as a collaborative environment where the way to deal with disagreements is to discuss with a view to trying to reach agreement. You have persistently refused to accept that Wikipedia works by consensus, not by the person who shouts most loudly ""RIGHT IS ON MY SIDE"" gets his or her way. You have attempted to intimidate other editors by suggesting that they might be subject to legal redress. (I have no interest in engaging with semantic quarrels about whether what you said constituted ""attacks"" or not.) You have repeatedly and persistently failed to hear what others have said to you when it has not suited your preferred view. You have repeatedly accused other editors of doing exactly the kind of things that I see you doing all the time. I get the impression that you sincerely do not see that you have been doing those things, but that is how it looks to me, viewing the matter as an uninvolved outsider, who had never before heard of this dispute, nor even of the school in question. As you have done with other issues, you wikilawyer over whether what you have done fits your reading of a definition of ""disruptive"" that you dredge up: I have no interest in responding to that, I simply ask myself ""do this editor's actions disrupt the working of the Wikipedia community?"" to which the answer is clearly and obviously ""yes, very much so"". The only thing about this block which might be reconsidered is that it is for a mere three days. Considering that your disruptive editing has been continuing over a period of more than three months, I would have blocked you for significantly longer. I suggest that you may find it helpful to stand back, look at your editing, try to imagine how it must look from the detached perspective of an uninvolved third party, and think how, when this very short block expires, you may be able to edit in ways that look more constructive to such a third party. The editor who uses the pseudonym """" " +Stop harassing me! I hope that you get blocked! Stop harassing me! I hope that you get blocked! +" Suggest renaming This article is (as currently written) really about the prospective effects of global warming on humans, not the general effects of climate change. An article as broadly titled as this on the ""effects of climate change"" would have to speak about climate changes generally. These would perforce include historic ""effects of climate change"" such as the Little Ice Age, the Roman Warming Period, Ice Ages, etc. We could include such historic climate effects here, but given the thrust of the article it would probably be best just to do a renaming. " +. It's hugely unlikely that it would even have become notable at all if she were lugging a mattress around to protest about, say, global warming +", 8 August 2008 (UTC) Concerning Mesić, this is not just one poll I am talking about, there were many. Every so often the news publish the results of the various agencies that researched this phenomenon. These polls do not, repeat, do not center on the capital. They are highly professional and reliable, and in each one, Mesić was voted the most popular. Need I also mention the ultimate poll of all? the presidential elections? two of them in fact, both of which he won as an independent candidate and did not rely on the support of any party. Furthermore, I find the idea that football hooligans represent the Croatian people highly offensive, as opposed to, for example, university students. I also do not know where you get the idea that the entire Croatian national football team is extreme right-wing, that is not the case. I imagine you must have come into contact only with certain circles of Croatian society. Perković generally draws his support from the rather rural parts of Croatia, and from people that hail from such war-stricken and... undeveloped areas. Modern, pro-western central urban areas, far from supporting the Great Patriot Perković, are the source of the many recent protests against him. I've not known him on a personal level for years so I cannot say whether or not he really cares about the Croatian people. I do know that professing eternal love for the ""holy soil of Croatia"" is absolutely essential for his cash flow, though. Quite frankly, I do not care about whether he really ""loves Croatia"", all I know is that he is the public focal point of a backward nationalist mentality that has claimed far too many victims and destroyed far too many economies around here. I dare say it is a little too easy to support such a mentality from a distance where its primitivistic repercussions cannot be felt. (TALK) 11:45" +I am agree with you. +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to May 3. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. +That's funny. You was personally offended? So the bad things writer new you, your name etc, right? And one get offended by a comment, or epithets on a website, then that same person must grow up spiritually for some more 5 centuries at least. And if one get more offended by the previous comment, then that same person must kill him/hersef. Take care! +is more compatible with the subject (a president of Islamic Republic of Iran) +Thank you for your help. I agree with you that it needs to be neutral and stay on topic. Like I said, I only wanted to list out all of the specialties equally who perform occuloplastic procedures. I also invite you to contact the American and Australiasian Boards and Colleges of Oral and Maxillofacial, Otolaryngology, and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery. I'm sure they will be able to provide you with plenty of information as well. Thank again for your help. +Catfights and bannings? The performance section ends with an admonition that the world of Thereminitude is markednay, scarredby brawls, catfights, and presumably murders and cannibalism over whether it's all right to touch the coil-thingys... Could we have a citation of a theremin-induced brawl or something? Man... over a freakin' THEREMIN... +Thank you for not threatening me. +I was just about to issue a final warning before doing so myself. Greenock125, you have been told no with a possibility that it can become a yes. You pointed out that you would agree to any condition, and you have been told the conditions but obviously you don't intend to agree with them. This talk page nonsense and your reversion of TFWOR has just dissolved any supporting i showed for WP:OFFER. +peculiar, as though the blocking admin was committed to blocking me and was simply setting a series of artificial conditions hoping I would fail one so I could be blocked; then blocking me anyway even after the conditions were met +", 28 March 2007 (UTC) No it´s not nationalist, look at how the Turks called the ones livin in Bosnia, they called them BOSNIAKS! Look how Bosnian catholic francisans called them selfs, BOSNIAKS! Look how Bosnian kings and bans called them selfs, BOSNIAKS! in 1881 the magazin ""Bosnjak""(Bosniak) was formed that also proves Bosniaks weren´t from 1993. The Serb shit of Bosniaks bein Serbs is just propaganda this HAS PROOFE. And then you have nothin left to say but ""Bosniak didn´t mean the same thing then as now..."" and you´re right, then Bosniaks were everybody but the Christians betraid our people and now Bosniaks are just Muslims. And you right MUSLIMS not MOSLIMS! I´m the best I simply am, you can right 1000 articles and I can right 1 I´m still better then you. I even diss you right now hahahaha. Rastko.org is a chetnik site, you link it to the aricle of a Bosniak ban, then I can link a Bosniak site as well. 18:50" ++++ Thank you for your interest in becoming a member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association. The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a New York City and San Francisco-based unincorporated organization that advocates the legalization of criminal pedophilic sexual relations between adult males and young boys. NAMBLA defends the right of minors to explore their sexuality more freely with older men. +" There were two main reasons why I closed: The solid arguments WP:SALAT and WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. ""Keep - but remove red links"" isn't really a solid rationale; it didn't really address the two arguments above. The second keep was stronger, but again didn't really address the points above, and was more along the lines of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. As We66er said, removing the redlinks would leave a list of five, which defeats the object of a ""list"". On the counter side of that argument, redlinks show potential for new articles, but when there are so many redlinks, there is no need for such a list. There were many items on the list, yet only a handful were referenced, and as another said, one of the organisations on that list had been deleted previously through AfD. The strongest keep therefore was WP:STAND, but that was struck as a result of misinterpretation. This is the full reason for my close. However, deleting admins don't generally say any more than ""keep"" or ""delete"" in their closing statement, unless 1) there is a specific reason for the delete and/or 2) it was a decision that could cause controversy. Generally the reasons for delete are ascertainable in the discussion itself. By the way, the text is at User:GRuban/deleted article for your review. Best, " +i live in an Italian neighborhood, last night I wore my grandmother's cameo and several people commented on this piece and finished the statement with godbless you..does the cameo have some symbolism other than a beautiful piece of art? +oops forgot to sign +" Probably he never read the main page as it stated ""Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit."" Block as many editors as you want, you think you can stop them all?" +Re your message: I recommend that you recreate the article from scratch. There was very little information beyond his name, where his is studying, his birthdate (which was unsourced), a message to his girlfriend (which is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article), and an unlinked reference to the paper you already provided. To establish his notability would require a fundamental rewrite, so restoring a copy of the article would not be of much help to you. +Your speculations are unhelpful. The Cherokee keep great records. If Warren really was Cherokee, it's safe to assume she would have a family member on their roles. +Correct! 22:34, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) +Although families-in-reason.org is mentioned by the Atheist Allliance International, Google does not show any actual site at that domain. The Whois.org site does not show such a domain registered or used. Sooo, lacking proof that it is a real or functioning organization, I will remove this reference. +" This message is regarding the article Bat. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia that people have worked hard to create. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ contribs • block • [ block log] ] (talk) " +" Can you please not delete my ""Bubzbeauty"" page! It has references to articles and proper citations. Also she is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page as she is one of the most subscribed YouTube personalities from the United Kingdom!This page should not be deleted!!! She has been interviewed by multiple online magazines and is notable enough to be on Wikipedia! The page also has proper sources and refrences! Please do not delete!" +" QVVERTYVS, I also disagree with your edits. Please move on.Talk " +Mutoor1 you would be blocked if you continue reducing number of films which MSV has worked on. You can also listen to Jayalalitha speaking in Jaya TV function held in August 2012, available in youtube where total work done by MSV is 1200 films. +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - (山本一郎)(会話) +" Interjection: There is a grammatical inconsistency between ""originally used"" and ""refers"". Since the past tense is correct, ""referred"" is a better word there. I'd also like to point out that the part about Prof Jones is a bit unclear. What experiment did he do that was different from the P/F work? Did it involve deuterium-saturated metal? If so, then technically there is little significant difference, today ""cold fusion"" is basically the description of a proposed explanation for the apparent appearance of heat in experiments that involve deuterium-saturated metal. Believers, of course, think that the heat is real and the proposal is the correct explanation. " +" I think the harcourt article is excellent, both because it provides additional context (particular in regards to the '19 and '28 weimar law), and in fact directly agrees to the basic premise of the argument. It is widely accepted (harcourt, library of congress) that the early laws were targeted directly against the Nazis, and other paramilitary groups that were threatening, and attempting to overthrow the weimar republic. (The government having effectively disarmed by the surrender terms of wwI was unable to control the armed groups engaging in what we today would probably term gang warfare). As late as '32 Heinrich Bruening attempted to ban the SA and SS (see rise and fall of the 3rd reich) (Ironically setting up the situation that enabled the Nazis to legally take control). The subsequent laws enacted by Hitler were to a) rearm the nazis, in particular the private army SAs. 2) ensure familiarazation of the about to be conscripted public with firearms usage. 3)ensure the disarm all political opponents, specifically calling out jews. Harcourt repeatedly and explicitly gives up the game - sure he disagrees with the NRAs use of nazi imagery in modern debate. Yes he says ""the nazi's were not in general pro gun control"". Both of those prior arguments are straw men, which do not in any way disprove the core history being argued - the core history which Harcourt specifically and explicitly admits to ""Hitler imposed regulations prohibiting Jewish persons from possessing any dangerous weaponsincluding firearms. The Nazi regime implemented this prohibition by confiscating weapons, including guns, from Jewish persons, and subsequently engaged in genocide of the Jewish population"" or ""To be sure, the Nazis were intent on killing Jewish persons and used the gun laws and regulations to further the genocide"". Nobody disagrees that Hitler armed his private army (SA, party), while disarming the people he was about to exterminate. Harcourt discusses this directly as well, quoting The Nazi minister of the interior ""“If these provisions guarantee that no enemies of the National Socialist state possess any weapons, then it is justifiable and appropriate to relax the current limiting provisions of the Weapons Law for the population faithful to the state"". To (Saul)WP:FRINGE You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. (/Saul) What part is fringe? That the nazis implemented gun control? That the gun control specifically targeted Jews? That there are a plethora of memos, diaries, and documents saying ""Go attack the jews, they are disarmed so you shouldn't have any resistance""? That the jews were later exterminated? Please identify the specific facts which you think are fringe. " +"His remarks which OBVIOUSLY ""were explicitly written to insult a person (me) rather than as constructive criticism of specific actions"" and contained no factual justification. My response contained words and statements that were correctly and appropriately describing (with civil English words) the FACTS in relation to nature of his personal attacks on me. In my attempt to obtain an apology from him, while Lacking any support against his attack, you decided to label me the transgressor, but not him. You appear to be very negligent and biased acting in your ""appointed role here???"" to say the least, if not totally malicious. I contend that your obviously biased behavior should preclude you from further involvement in any ""moral code violation"" disciplinary action, let alone this specific one. This is for starters in addressing your negative comments about me. I hope I have I made this point clear to YOU now! " +185.15.59.211 The account looks to be an unauthorized bot, or else an authorized bot which is editing contrary to the Wikipedia:Bot policy. (Specifically, it's editing while logged out, and thus it's not clear who is operating it and what its purpose is.) Its edit summaries link to the page +" FAR notification William IV of the United Kingdom has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Remove"" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Chwech " +now please dont oppose my image of jatt sikhs during a rally which has been clicked by my personal cameraman! +Proposal to Delete this article. The Quran teaches that Jesus was not crucified. This article is up for deletion. - 12:06 AM 14 May, 2015 +Pop. Culture, hobbies, life-stuff, LGBT issues, normal stuff teens today are interested in. Not that I am normal lol. 12.186.80.1 +" Facts I think I'm finally starting to get the hang of this Finding of Fact malarkey, Brad. The scenario: Bishonen has been focusing her energies for the last few weeks on her attempt to get an editor called Nina Green banned from Wikipedia. When Bishonen realises that Nina Green is indeed going to be banned She posts to the arbcom page in green text: FoF perfectly normal. Arbcom pages are like little rainbows. At the end of a talk page post about the green text, Bishonen suddenly decides to refer to it as ""dye"": FoF Not at all forced or contrived. Lots of people refer to text as dye. Or if they don't, they should do. Bishonen ends her post with ""Green dye!"" which reads as ""Green die!"": Fof Pure coincidence. Nina Green couldn't have been further from Bishonen's mind when she wrote ""Green dye!"". Bishonen hadn't though of Nina Green for at least 30 seconds. FOF: This entire sequence events: Bishonen wants Nina banned, gets what she wants, posts in green text, decides to call text ""dye"", and ends her post for no apparent reason with ""Green dye!"" is just a random bubble of billion-to-one-coincidence. Bishonen could just have easily chosen blue text, and it would have made perfect sense to end her post with ""Blue Pigment!"". Yep. I think I've got this FoF thing, now. And it certainly makes it a lot easier to understand how arbcom arrives at its decisions. " +The document was carried by Leeds University until recently when they changed their Intranet. This why the link was updated. This seems a rotten way to try and remove info rather than discuss content specifics. You are implying that the document is falsified. Is that correct? +" Just a question Hi! I don't want to impose too much, but I'm curious: Did you actually read the article that started the altercation between me and Medeis, or did you just look at the links he provided to his own talk page? I fully admit that I was being mildly insulting. I can also assure you that I could have done much ""better"" at being insulting if I had put the effort into it. Medeis himself has also proven himself capable of insults as you can see by browsing his talk page and then looking up the other side. One particularly inelegant response to somebody who did not agree with him was ""Hah, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Eh hm. Huh, hah, ha, ha, ha! (Hah!)"". But he seems to have developed a habit of threatening all kinds of things, if his own hide is pierced. He's new, I'll grant that. But if you want to know what the fuss was about, it started right here: Pama–Nyungan languages. He seems to be reverter-in-charge of that page. By his own admission he knows nothing about the subject. Neither do I, as a matter of fact, but there are a couple of things that I am aware of in this field, and one of them is that the current orthodoxy is still in its hypothesis stage. Take a look if you're interested in Australian languages, but beware of the article's bias - this bias is what started it all. As for me and Medeis I suspect you'd rather prefer never to have known about us at all. All the best " +This IP Just so you know, this is an IP that rotates among AT&T; DSL customers in Houston and possibly elsewhere; edits made from this address now are very unlikely to be being made by the same person as edits made last week. For instance, the person typing this has no idea who Kurt Shaped Box is and thinks it sucks that he got harassed. 69.154.191.30 +" Tamar Braxton U R retarded!!How can youtube not be a verifiable source. I put a clip of her hitting a D and E one octave above Soprano C(D7 and E7) and you say it's not a good source? What is then! I bet if I even got a video of her hitting whistle notes you'd say it wasn't verifiable. Of course it it. if you see or hear her hitting a whistle note, then she's a whistle registre singer. The same applies to all whsitle register singers!!!! U R just stupid!!!!! U and Mr. ""I'll bring the food"" who totally destroyed the Whsitle register singers category." +" ""Please stop calling my good friend (BrandonYusufToropov an Islamist"" I didn't, I said that's the kind of things Islamists say. (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) " +I can be a little aggressve sometimes. Particularly when trying to stress a point in writing. Anyway, it's obvious that the debate is just going to go back-and-forth a little bit; I'm hoping there's some higher power we can approach and ask how it should be done. +Just wikiholism, I guess. I am back to normal now. +Bacronym You're welcome. I saw the way you cleaned that article up - that was great work. Siobhan Hansa +, including those of people who do live there +You are a pathetic american who will distrusts the rest of the world. Just give it up mate you are a sad individual. +What is the need of tagging..when we can improve the article without tagging..it is looking odd and very bad after tagging. +FYI You may want to have a look at this: 30 touchdowns and less than 10 interceptions in a single season. +{{unblock|No thank you to wikipedia; you have just lost a potential dedicated editor and contributor. I hope that the foundation is happy having been so unwelcoming to a new member of the community. So long and thanks for all the fish. +Sand in your vagina? If you have sand in your vagina, and it's bothering you, you may wish to douche rather than attacking other users and escalating fights, which you have clearly done. If you'd backed off and taken the advice at WP:CIV and WP:NPA, you wouldn't have any problems. You should be blocked for your offenses. I may report you. Yes, you're a fucking kid. You're not an adult. Why fight it? Why not admit it? I may be twice your age and know a hell of a lot more than you do, like how to resist snitching on people and minding your own business. You're asking to be reprimanded, dumbass. +"==Copyright problem: Bonghan theory== Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Bonghan theory, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from , and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Bonghan theory and send an email with confirmation of permission to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted 'under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Bonghan theory with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA'', and note that you have done so on Talk:Bonghan theory. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.''' It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Bonghan theory saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! " +hi my name is lisa topp and i love every one not ! +" ""Ants evolved..."" as a statement of fact. I was wondering if we could have some references inserted after the second sentence of this article: ""Ants evolved from wasp-like ancestors in the mid-Cretaceous period between 110 and 130 million years ago and diversified after the rise of flowering plants."" Also, perhaps this statement should begin with the words ""Many experts believe..."" or ""Evidence suggests..."" etc. etc. rather than making a statement of fact since this is not an established fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.6.149.18 This brings up a good point that many things are stated as fact when it comes to science. I think that people are only careful to state things the way you describe for things that haven't been statistically proven, which points out several flaws in the statement. Evolution is well enough established as well as ants evolving from wasps, but them first appearing the the mid-Cretaceous period is hard to statistically prove. I suppose this should be changed if I'm right, but I may not be. ~talk The Cretaceous period is not a short duration even on an evolutionary scale. The sentence might appear precise if used with some small unit of time but putting it at somewhere between 110 to 130 million years is not exactly being very precise nor does it appear to be an arrogant statement of the available evidence. Very true. ~talk ants where do ants mate. how long do they live. do they have sex. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.207.156 heh, viable question. This spawned me to look over the reproduction part of the page and I did some rewriting. It should be double-checked for good measure. The article answers these well enough. Ant's live varied amounts of time depending on many things. Some workers only live a few months while some queens have been recorded to live more that 30 years. ~talk Common ants varieties There is almost no mention of Little Black Ants or Red Ants in this article. I see these ants everywhere and think that there should be more mention of them. I'm not sure where you are but if it's Europe then those guys are probably Lasius niger and Myrmica rubra. They aren't common everywhere. '''[[User:Sean.hoyland| +Your username Hi. I don't know if you're aware of this, but your username is nearly identical to mine. In fact it's just a capital letter short of being identical to my original username, located at . Wikipedia's username policy prohibits creating a username that could easily be confused with that of an active contributor. Would you please consider changing your username so as to avoid confusion between our accounts? Please reply here; I'll keep this page on my watchlist. Thank you. +I've also added Stein to nursing categories for German, military, and researchers. +" How does it feel To be a negress? Do you find it hard on yourself because your race genetically has average 85 IQ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.168.226 " +" Edit request from Jayjoanz, 14 February 2011 Please add the following information to the ""Public Image"" section of Lady Gaga's page: Lady Gaga's public perception is always amongst the most controversial of topics in popular culture. Debate about her style and influence on youth stems from her unceasing desire to walk the thin line between daring and inappropriate. The pop stars ability to command the attention of her fans and critics is unmatched and with a growing list of hit records she has solidified herself as a marketable brand. Her 2.8 million Twitter followers and 5.2 million Facebook fans represent evidence of her ability to move product (Hampp, 2010). With opposing ideals about the negative or positive impact of her music, fashion, and public statements there is little question that the benefits of her talent outweigh the detriments. Her fan base and customer base are similar in nature because they are both drawn to her outspoken and outrageous personality (Hampp, 2010). Works Cited Hampp, Andrew. ""GAGA, OOOH LA LA: WHY THE LADY IS THE ULTIMATE SOCIAL CLIMBER."" Advertising Age 81.8 (2010): 42. Communication & Mass Media Complete. EBSCO. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. I think that section already basically says that. Also, we don't list how many Twitter followers and Facebook followers a person has because there's no way to really verify that information are those real people? Are there any sockpuppet accounts? Anyway, the article basically says all that already. Drug-taking? Shouldn't something be said about her drug taking. She admitted it on her CBS 60 Minutes interview that she smokes A LOT of pot while writing music, while drinking whiskey. It's mentioned on other musician's articles, so why not here? 90.193.141.136 I'm surprised her former cocaine habit isn't mentioned here as well, seeing as she's talked about it in multiple places now (60 Minutes, Vanity Fair). 128.163.242.6 Edit request from Cvachov, 18 February 2011 1986–2004: Early life Lady Gaga was born Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, to an Italian American family, in New York City on March 28, 1986,[11] ...in Yonkers. NY... Yonkers is it's own city and not part of New York City, it is located in Westchester County, not one of the five boroughs. Per the cited source, ""Birth Place: New York, NY."" It does not state Yonkers. If you check the talk page history, you'll also see that this issue has been researched and discussed at end, and established consensus is that she was not born in Yonkers. —' (talk) Early Management requested addition Frank Fredericks, a fellow freshman at NYU, recognized Stefani's talent when they competed against each other in a campus talent show. Fredericks began managing Stefani in the Spring of 2005, booking her shows at the nearby club the Bitter End. They worked together for over year, until she began working with producer Rob Fusari. sources: http://nymag.com/arts/popmusic/features/65127/index3.html Lady Gaga Jewish I dont have a link, but she is Jewish. 91.115.58.243 OK, please come back when you have a link that meets WP:BLP:) (talk to me)''''' No she is not. She is of Italian descent and was raised Roman Catholic, and she also attended a Catholic school. She is not Jewish. She is Catholic, and the article already has sources stating so. [[User:Willth +". User:NawlinWiki Blocked ""The Sp-Un-Ka"" Page, I Was wondering What His Reasons Were. I Did Not Know This Was Conisdered ""Vandalism""." +Further complicated when the Greek government decided to forgive and forget and allow the return of a large number of Slavic-speaking Greek Communists to Greece (they were also given enhanced Greek War hero pensions by the Socialist government which unsurprisingly encouraged the influx). +Category:Articles requiring a direct DNB link +Nothing personal, Emico- but I will make sure each one of your sockpuppet accounts are discovered until you follow the rules. +trhis is well bad No becki and rosay leave ( but anyways, is Ani Gwenno's sister? +" I always prevent Pakistani editors from POV pushing, but if they find a valid source, then one must accept it. 1971 war is the only war where India was able to defeat Pakistan. And Indians and Pakistanis must understand the difference between Battle and War. Pakistan casualty was higher in 1965, but considering India's population compared to Pakistani population, the Pakistani casualty should have been much higher in 1948, 1965, and Kargil to say India won. Sometimes two neutral reliable sources maybe contradictory and at that time we need to add both statement stating their sources, even if they are opposite in claims.   Emperor  " +Fly away and grow up from your classic bullying, threats and petulant silencing. We're all praying for you to, but in the hiatus we're laughing at you. +instruments it should be mentioned that he can play keyboards and guitar as well. +Yo there! You are a useless and fucking douchebag. Go fuck yourself, you are a disgrace to wikipedia!!!! YOU, SIR, ARE A BALLSACK! You think you are so much smarter than everyone else! Why do you think you are so smart! I wish you would leave the Wikipedia! I can't stand the way you BS the man! +" Patient please, patient Inks. (talk✉) " +Michele Renouf Obviously, this is not acceptable in the light of 's consistent disparaging of a certain type of media. Anybody agrees? +I consider you calling me a vandal a personal attack. The fat remains tha you ARE a jackass. Asking for sources from a FIRST HAND witness? +What particularly needs to be sourced? chi? +Just the same, the controversies need to be in the article. +":::::::::::::::: There are more than 5 sources in the article. We are not just counting the five listed. (t) " +Thank you for the email, yet I am unable to open the deleted article. Could you please just send through the actual article in the email Thanks +Protected edit request on 4 September 2014 I wish the changes that I made could be introduced in the article. All edits are backed by secondary sources. +Yes it was. With two overlapping blocks, once the shorter one expires, the whole thing expires. +" Thanks. He may put up a rant/attack via the IP talkpage, as he did on Commons. I hardblocked the IP for a week with no talk access over there. INeverCry " +"heading. My common usage understanding of the word is that it means statistical information about something, or the study thereof. My own 1990 dictionary says demographics: data resulting from the science of demography, and demography: the scientific study of human populations, especially with relation to their size, structure and distribution. So on that basis, the articles would be correctly titled 'demographics of...', and quote lots of statistics. It would appear to me that, according to my quite large dictionary, the article is wrong in its definition of these two terms. At the least, it should explain that there is a possible different understanding of the terms. My own interest was how broad the term demographics is, and whether when discussing a population it would include information about the land area, climate, how wet it is, all that sort of stuff which undoubtedly affects and influences the people living there, even though it might not be the sort of information collected by modern advertising executives. I suspect that a difference in understanding of the terms has crept in because such people are only interested in a subset of the total information. I completely agree with you dictionary. However the key phrase is ""the scientific study of human populations"". Once human population is no longer an essential part of the study (as in climate, landmass etc. which will be the same regardless of population) it is no demography; I do agree that if climate has an effect on the population (e.g. in the arctic region people tend to protect themselves against cold) it is interesting from demography; but without such reference not. Non-families I notice that a lot of Wikipedia articles use some sort of template putting households into four categories: ""had children under the age of 18 living with them"", ""were married couples living together"", ""had a female householder with no husband present"", and ""non-families"". These categories do not add up to 100%;, for examples see Downers Grove, Willowick, Ohio, etc etc. Any ideas about where this came from, and how it can be addressed? It seems like a category generated as part of a marketing strategy. Novickas Generational Cohorts Are those born during the brief 1977-83 period generation-less? That's exactly what I was thinking what's the deal?? I'll quote below ""Generation X cohort (born from 1965 to 1976) Memorable events: Challenger explosion, Iran-Contra, social malaise, Reaganomics, AIDS, safe sex, fall of Berlin Wall, single parent families Key characteristics: quest for emotional security, independent, informality, entrepreneurial Generation Y cohort also called N Generation (born from 1983 to 2007) "" Seems to be years 1977 through 1982 are wandering generation lost. ) I was recently at a business conference and they where talking about the generations and they referred to the N Generation as the milenials, or the milenial generation, those who haven't known a time before the computer" +"(Not to mention ""gang bangers"" is a phrase for members of gangs who may or may not do any sexual gang bangs of males or females. So it's appropriate for individuals in question.) " +He can't. He's an admin. He has to act like a condescending twat. It's the admin and registered user code of law +" ISBN of Portrait of the Cheshire Lines Committee Hi, following up on your revert of my (and 's) changes to Ainsdale Beach railway station. According to WorldCat, the ISBN of Portrait of the Cheshire Lines Committee is in fact 0-7110-2521-5 (or 978-0-7110-2521-9; they're equivalent). The ISBN ""0 7110 2512 5"" is invalid; the check digit ""5"" at the end doesn't match up with the rest of the number. I built a tool for working with ISBNs, and it also shows that this one is incorrect. Even if the incorrect version appears in the book, libraries are likely to be listing it under the corrected version—Wikipedia should too. {{ |talk |edits}} " +how much did it cost? How much did the furries pay to get ottersex on the front page? +Get someone to agree with you. +There is no connection between religion and mathematics that I can see, by the way what exactly is Islamic thought and what does it have to do with Mathematics. This seems to be obvious to you , so , how about explaining this to other wikipedia editors who may not be see the connection. . +Eaglestorm - Wikipeida edits I would like to thank you for Inde blocking my former account Whitmore 8621, but You should blocked Eaglestorm for being a cyberBully, and a internet stalker. I removed the templates off my talk page because I thought they were worthless. Ealgestorm gave me a very hard time for ne reason and you introduced yourself to me when it was already quite bad. He revoked Dennis Hart edits even though what I added was truthful. He got only blocked for 24 hours I got Blocked for a week. Eaglestorm is a terrible person for what he does to people it just wrong he is a intenret bully. He humilated me numerous times while I was on Wikipedia and would not leave me alone he is no siant either. So I suggest you block him for corruption or so fourth. 220.244.146.157 Whitmore 8621 +Yea Boi Hello you took away my edit of Victor Cruz being #80 and you said i had no evidance. well, he is currently number 80. so how does it feel to have that mouth shut? you NEVER come after me AGAIN buddy. how does it feel? seriously? how does it TASTE to know you are only one thing! and that's WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!! +17:35, 9 January 2011 +Welcome!Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia: Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome! +Thanks for the suggestion... Re: Friends episodes articles. I used the capitals used in the main List of Friends episodes page where prior editor(s) capitalized all the first letters of the titles. I totally agree with your point though. I will take some time to format these correctly as well. As for the debate about having an article for each episode, I have looked for episode summaries for Friends before and they are not very in depth. What I was hoping to achieve in the wiki medium was to create relationships between plots and characters that may not be obvious in a regular 'summary' format. As another example, considering the legacy of Star Trek (and the obvious abundance of info on the series on the 'net), I think the Wiki entries for episode guides did an exceptional and unique job. (I'm even using the little nav table) I am going to try very hard not to just regurgitate what's already available out there. +" So then why don't ""you"" as a ""nonpartial"" editor who ""doesn't work for the bank"" remove it from the Anonymous article as well? Otherwise, I'll ask ""you"" to please keep the sarcasm and allegations of synthesize to ""yourself"" and I will be happy to " +Why was the link for Cell/Mobile phone ebooks deleted? +" Question about what to do Harry, Hi. One of our Wiki editors, " +, 10 December 2005 (UTC) You are welcome to now remove this message if you so wish. 13 17:53 +". Might fall under ""trivia"" / ""In Popular Culture"" category" +User Kibele and her lynch campaign for Mr. Hasan Sami Bolak Hi; User:Kibele is a personal political enemy of Mr. Hasan Sami Bolak and she had a political lynch campaign in order to delete his article in the Turkish wikipedia. She has real hate of him that she deletes his name whereever she sees as you can see . She also uses puppets to get rid of three revert rule on the edit wars. She is a dictator in the Turkish wikipedia and using lots of puppets to use in her campaigs. Pls think about this situation and help me on her edit wars. Thanks. 212.156.67.30 +So can I restore it the the IWU article? +U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA U R N IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA +193.107.215.195 Indented line Bulleted list itemSmall textSubscript text +, 8 September 2008 (UTC) No, it is not disruptve to add Ukrainian and Israeli source, why on earth are you reticent about the Israeli source you erased yourself?! This interview was given, it is confirmed by 7 sources from 4 different and independent countries and if you expect me to add a link of the original interview in Hebrew, that is not going to happen, because I do not know the language! You probably do not know Russian too, so abstain from removing disruptively Segodnya's and Vremya Novostei's articles, which you indulged to several times! Your effort to intimidate every user quoting Russian language sources other than the Novaya gazeta is simply harassment. 18:50 +Bongwarrior's mother Bongwarrior's mother had a troubled history. She began working as a child prostitute at the age of 13. She had several pimps during her adolescence. During this time, she was repeatedly gang raped by people from Africa. But she enjoyed it because she enjoyed having two or three big black dicks in her vagina and anus at the same time. One night when she was 18, she got drunk at a neighborhood bar near her home in Jackson, Mississippi. While walking home she met an African American homeless person, with whom she conceived Bongwarrior. +I see that you Sunnis are only bothered with the fact that Jinnah, Bhutto and Khan are Shias. As much as you hate it, these people are Shia Muslims and you people have no right to remove this from the article. +And this is why this page gets deleted. Because people create it filled with nothing and seems redundant. +I like the sound of this discussion. Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays whatever fits! Best, +Stop being an idiot There is no such thing as Islamic terrorism or miltancy. Islam does not teach this. I seriously suggest you get a education of basic world religions. +Yeah, but that wasn't what I was looking for. Erwin +Fwolinseal.gif Thanks for pointing out to me that that image is going to be deleted. I thought it had already been deleted, actually. It's redundant to the one used in the Olin College article, and the image actually used is properly taged (it's fair use as a logo). | (talk) 17:52, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC) +Deadliest battles I haven't found any definitive list of America's deadliest battles, but that'd be something interesting to throw on here. The estimates always vary, and the straight definition of a battle varies, but it could be done. I'm pretty sure the top 3 are Meuse-Argonne Offensive, Battle of the Bulge and Battle of Okinawa. +The Highway bridge and railroad bridge were valid facts. The RTE 3A bridge is the dividing point. Way to rain on the parade. +You have been folloing me around like a troll making disruptive comments and flaming the fires. You are the one that should be blocked. Nothing good has come from your comments 75.91.169.43 +It seems likely that you are the same user as Microartstudio. If so then you have already been informed of Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest, and that it is not acceptable to edit to promote a company. I notice that some of your editing has repeated editing by Microartstudio which had been reverted. If you continue to edit contrary to Wikipedia's guidelines then you may be blocked from editing. +lol, do I look like I care if you give me a couple more medals? o.O +POV tag I've removed the POV tag since there is no feedback here as to how the article lacks POV. I wish people would stop bitching about the name. This is an encyclopedia; a brief comment on how the name change caused some controversy in the media when it was first announced is about all the air play it deserves. Has anyone seriously changed their mind about the merits of the console due to its name? Personally I was a little taken aback by the name for about 30 seconds and then I was intrigued about Nintendo's explanation of what the term represented and what that means for the intended audience for the console. / (talk) +You guys just don't get it. Your bad behavior drives other editors off the site who then become enemies. Editors like Brangifer and Verbal are trouble-makers who go around attacking articles and offending other editors who are trying to contribute their knowledge. Neither of them has a collaborative attitude. They barrel into an article with guns blazing and wonder why people end up hating them and can't assume good faith. Editors who spend all day, every day, on the site as if it were a full-time job are just mucking things up for editors who are trying to be productive. Once an editor has exhausted his knowledge, any further contribution he makes is of little value. It is the Brangifers and Verbals on the site who are initiating the edit-wars. +Do you think I care? Get out of here you smelly Kroll! +Green |Red |Desu Desu Desu Desu Desu |Edit this page, and you are a cocksucker ~ Desu +calumscott.com This is the offical home site of human males called emma and jen. This is a well known site for classic religious sexual acts of apparent death and kipsta sex, the female is standing suspended upside down, then the male antidisestablishmentareanisms the worlds population of bob. This site is well known for the people from virgin media going on itunes to download songs and violent images or rogers. The squareish nature of the religious implications of the site incite a deeper meaning into the new age cultures of a modern south western eco society. +The only NNS road course race with an article is the 2012 NAPA Auto Parts 200 and it doesn't have any kind of tables (orders, results, etc.). What ever you guys think. (talk) +Your involvement with DRN Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon ) +" Hey again. Sorry about taking more than a month to get my act together! I've been busy with school, real life, and admin stuff. I've looked over Victoria's article and fixed a few things, but nothing major jumps out at me as needing to be fixed. After you look over Wilson's article, let's go ahead and give our GA announcement to the project. There's a huge backlog at WP:GAC under the sports section, so I think we should go ahead and list them asap, before another 40 articles are listed before them. In other news, I'm working on Dawn Marie Psaltis in my sandbox because I found a lot of good sources for her when I was researching Wilson. 311 " +A.K.D.A.H.N why do u keep blockin me for no reason im givin complimints............................................................................. +" The only reason I would oppose that is because it would not be consistent with all other album articles. And also, making it smaller would also increase the 'emptyness' feeling as there is already too much of, well, emptyness/space in the table ;) man " +NYScholar Hi John, just a courtesy note that I unblocked this fellow following further developments that Alison listed at ANI. Thanks +Actually, the Samsung unit installed at Fife Energy Park in Scotland in 2013 has the world's largest rotor diameter (171.2m) and worlds largest swept area (22,998m2). See article Methil Offshore Wind Farm. +There are documented errors in that book, so I for one would be more likely to consider the newest version (which I have access to) that incorporates corrections as reliable than the one on Google Books. AFAIK, there were errata sheets included in the print volume that likely were not scanned. It might be a good idea to verify those entries, but I as yet have no idea how to cite an e-book page, because I think they aren't always one-to-one with the printed volume. +Please stop disrupting Wikipedia by adding spurious vandalism warnings to other editors' talk pages, and making spurious vandalism reports merely to prove a point. Thank you. +=================================================================== Pablo flores has violated my civil rights deleting my discussion on elisa carrio. That imbecil is overseas so he does not need to worry that much about my civil rights. This abusive behavious, knowing he is immune to the law in the US must not be tolerated by wikipedia. He must not work as a censor, he must not be allowed to do anything to whatever was produced in the territory of the US, he should refrain from invading our territoriality, he should remain concentrated in the articles produced in his own country. Now i understand why he cared so little about my warnings regarding our bill of rights. also, his english is as good as my dog's, he can't add comentary in a language he has so poor command of. +"1. State where ""the sources"" use that exact wording. 2. I mentioned already that it may be disinformation, and is not a majority opinion 3. Links are for references, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. Besides that, the link is for information which ""debunks"" the subject matter itself, and is bias. " +The level of positive vs. negative info is wholly irreleavnt to an article's being classified as good or bad. Objectivity is what counts. Now, we are trying to compose an aporriate section about PETA's stance on pet ownership. Let us get on with it. +Hello I am Clue Bot, and I am a Niger Fukcing Piece of Shlt. +" Looks good. Thanks! ―Œ(talk) " +Amen to that. The name of article implies a connection with the banking crisis. That link is spurious. American car manufacturers make an inferior product and are massively burdened with huge retired-worker costs and strong unions. As a result, they have not been profitable and the recent petrol prices and now the funding crisis (due to the banking crisis) have brought them to the edge - sooner than they would otherwise have got there. Foreign car manufacturers are not in this position and do not have the same history and it is absolutely *wrong* to lump them into this article. +You are TRULY an IGNORANT CUNT, and wikipedia is poorer for your participation. GO FUCK YOURSELF, you obviously need help. +Oh yeah? I say your mom escalates the situation with her face. And you should be exorcised. All your base are belong to us. God Double Bless. +":::, I went hunting in the jungle of sources, but have returned empty handed to the gates of Wikipedia. grapped the right bottle in the doctor's bag when they reached for the one labled A7. Best, Sing " +IS REALLY GAY LOLZOZLZ +The Roman province of Africa consisted of what is now Tunisia and Algeria. Therefore, Gelasius was probably a Berber and certainly not of sub-Saharan African ancestry. +Phaedriel, I couldnt have put it better, so I won't. Spawn M8, if you need a Wikibreak, then by all means take one! But please don't chicken out on us! Remember; if all the good folks leave there will only be pricks and prats left to ruin all that we've created here. Rest, regroup, recharge and reflect on it, bro. +" That would be a ridiculous assumption, considering I just asserted my disagreement. (talk|Contribs) " +" Rankings At the beginning of October, substantial material was added which is mostly critical of the University's recent performance and advertising. With a few tweaks, this material has mostly been accepted on Wikipedia. However, the section on rankings has since then been subject to a slow edit war between the original anon and another. I reproduce the fuller version of the section below for discussion: In 2010 QS World University Rankings ranked the University of Canterbury 189th overall in the world, making it the third highest ranked university in New Zealand. Its individual global subject rankings were: 212th in Arts & Humanities, 110th in Engineering & IT, 242nd in Natural Sciences, and 152nd in Social Sciences. In 2011 the University of Canterbury slipped from 189th to 212th in these rankings.http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/5569146/NZ-universities-lose-ground University loses ground. As the 2011 results were released, the University of Canterbury launched an advertising campaign in which the VIce Chancellor Dr Rod Carr claims that it ranks among the top 2% of universities in the world but without elaborating on what basis this was assessed.http://www.bsec.canterbury.ac.nz/ Uni in top 2%. Further, the University has promoted itself as being the first university in New Zealand to have been granted five stars by QS Stars, a global university rating system.http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/5708043/Canterbury-University-gets-top-marks Canterbury University gets top marks. Unlike the QS World University rankings, QS Stars ratings are only given to universities that pay a fee; the programme is designed to give ""...those institutions that are not highly ranked or do not appear in the rankings an opportunity to reach out to their prospect students, to stand out and to be recognised for their excellence.http://iu.qs.com/projects-and-services/qs-stars/ QS Stars."" The second anon wishes to truncate the paragraph after the second sentence, ie from ""In 2011"" onwards. No reason has been given for this. I have suggested that this third sentence remain, since it is purely factual and referenced, but I am less willing to defend the rest of the paragraph which appears to be combining a number of sources to make an argument or inference not directly supported by the sources directly. My proposal is clearly not satisfactory to either of the anons. I welcome their explanations here, and input from other parties.-gadfium " +" BracketBot – Jadams7831 Page: Diff: Comment/question: Thanks. i just looked at Julie Christie again and it seems OK( I didn't see your Bracket issue) " +The adminazi got me. Probably the Roland Freisler of Wikiland. After some Blockwart turned me in. Wieki-Heil, so to say. Fortunately it is only virtual. The lanterns in Wikiland are also virtual, after we free it. 70.137.146.36 +Please do not keep reinserting the same material into New Zealand-related articles. There are a number of editors who do not agree with your understanding of the facts. I suggest you explain on the relevant talk pages why you consider your wording to be an improvement on the existing wording. If you fail to do this, you edits are likely to continue to be reverted.- +Welcome! Hello, Chaos.squirrel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! +" Can we use this map Can we use http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/mumbaiterrorstrike/map.aspx which as been modified from . It has been releases under CC licenses. TalkContributions " +But that doesn't have much to do with how bad the movie itself is. This is a list of movies with the poorest quality, not the worst snowball effect.74.111.124.39 +tab delimited submission for product feeds, etc. All these things fall into the cat of search engine submission. +": im alive again i won the round i edited just a minute before i was blocked(lucky shot there) and you kicked me while i was down by replying to my messages even though you knew i cudnt reply gud job gud job. you also got me blocked for no reason the last edit i made before i got blocked was not biased or bad at all why dont you check it? anyway you will be happy to know i edited it and the man on the moon quote was added ""again"" its clear that the malaysian is using a dynamic ip and that his opinions are biased he tries hard not to admit it and you are taking his side on this unless there is concrete evidence there should not be assumptions like this made here if you teach me how to cite sources or links i would gladly prove his opinions wrong if you are watching wiki i suggest you correct his edits if he cites that irrelevant source again. you should have warned me before you reported me for blocking thanks to you i have a block on my record you may have cheated your way by using the 3RR as a reason but you shall not win the war " +ya mum fucks ya +" Sorry, I took this from the great ""W.S. Burroughs community"": Reality Studio. There are more pages on this site about Ashbery, Locus Solus and Art and Literature. " +This guy is a fat kike who likes spending time with his parents in an ash tray ahahaha +Thanks again! Made some more touch-ups, and after a little more Peer Reviewing I think I'll take a shot at FA. I'll post again to request your support when I do. D +" I have extended the above block to indefinite due to the violation of our no legal threats policy. You may not edit Wikipedia while judicial or quasi-judicial actions are progress. Please see the WP:NLT policy for more details. (talk→  ←track) " +, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Most sensible people say bad things about me behind my back. I appreciate your positive notes. 15:54 +" Thanks The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, and good vandal-fighting, keep it up! BlastOButter42  Hear Speak " +I do appreciate your help Hell In A Bucket!!! +" Let me also point your attention at the fact that by writing in a subjunctive mood (""If one were to code these cases as occupations,"") thereby not endorsing the thesis of their occupation. He also does not state this ""occupation"" ended in 1989, his point is that the only strict date we can speak about is 1989, because after that date it is impossible to speak about any occupation. In any event, since he does not include the Baltic case even as a hypothetical example of occupation, we can safely conclude that he does not consider the Baltic states as occupied by the USSR. " +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Portal:Biography, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (tlk) (cntrbtns) +GunMetalAngel, Easycore is a genre, it's even a page on wikipedia. It's a combination of Metalcore and Pop Punk. Hate to tell you. +" lies vs vandalism Maybe you should consider blocking [[User:The Cat and the Owl|The Cat and the Owl] instead? In my view lying in articles is worse than ""vandalizing"" them, the latter is quite easily identified while the former is not." +Ok. Thanks for that. Will do.l +" Orphaned non-free image (Image:Battmap.gif) Thanks for uploading Image:Battmap.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. " +" Dumb question from a non doctor Wikipedian trying to help medical English students is ""embryonic germ disc"" the same as ""Germ_layer""? One of my students chose the first as his topic for his Wikipedia article and after trying to understand what he wrote and failing (you can see it here " +I apologize for identifiing your modification as vandalism while it wasn't, next time please do not just remove piece of article without filling in why you wiped whole section +Would definitely work better with you Pugidsound The Rat King +I agree with you. I am a Chinese contributor to this site and I speak 3 Chinese vernaculars and 3 European languages and through some of the unreasonable Mandarinization imposed here, I feel how repressed non-native Mandarin speakers are by those apparently native speakers. Traditionally, foreign names are transliterated into Chinese ideographs by whichever vernacular group that first settled there. In USA and Europe, it is mostly by the Cantonese, then subsequently The Minnan-Taiwanese and recently the people for Fuzhou, Wenzhou etc. As such, they will use Han ideographs to represent the sounds they transliterate from the foreign language like English. There is no standardised version until the Northerners came into power and imposed Mandarin on all the other Chinese groups for the noble mission of reuniting the motherland against foreign invaders through bettering communication. I think the best way to transliterate and reflect the diversity of Chinese culture is to put the actual foreign name first, i.e. the ORIGINAL, followed by the oldest transliteration (in chronology) and finally the Mandarin version. That will make it easy for everyone cos then the eyes will zoom right to the end for the contemporary Mandarin pronunciation and zoom right to the first line for the original and if readers have time, they can trace the colorful history of transliteration and migration by reading the chronology of changes. Thank you for being so interested in Chinese culture. We need more friends like you. Have a nice day. +Throughout October and November, I notice that old characthers of Gundam SEED still very popular in Japan, especially Kira and Athrun who dominate first and second position. +You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As they say in Texas. I’ll bet you couldn’t pour !@#$ out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won’t go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. You’re a putrescent mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon. You are a bleating foal, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done. I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformation. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell? Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly. You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs. You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You’re a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won’t have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot. And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake? You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral[size] equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meat slapper. On a good day you’re a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go. You smarmy lager lout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock. You grotty wanking oink artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill. You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you, and I wish you would go away. I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I’m sorry. I can’t go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don’t have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel. Duh. The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of what you wrote, because, well... it didn’t really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creat +" I have changed the title of the section to ""Speculation about the cause of the crash""." +The POV tag Please do not post the tag on a well-refenced article unless you discuss it on the talk page first. If you have a problem with anything, please discuss it with other editors. (talk, email) +" Not at all - it shows a child with a toy gun and discusses the psychological effects the conflict has had on Israeli youth, of which this kid is one. B, are you simply going to the Wikipedia Review and reading what they write, and coming over here to Wikipedia? David '''''' " +More storms =May Subtropical Storm Ive found a possbile May subtropical stomr in the far eastern Atalantic. Heres the Links... http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/122/img-2005-05-02-06-goe-12-ir.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/122/img-2005-05-02-09-goe-12-ir.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/123/img-2005-05-03-00-met-7-ir.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/122/img-2005-05-02-21-met-7-ir.html =A Perfect Storm Wanabe Ive found anotoer stomr similar in sturcuture to the Perfect Storm of 1991 http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/128/img-2005-05-08-00-goe-12-ir.html =Anothere May Subtropical storm Theres another May subtropical storm WAAAY off in the eastern Atlantic. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/141/img-2005-05-21-00-goe-12-ir.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/141/img-2005-05-21-03-goe-12-ir.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/141/img-2005-05-21-06-goe-12-ir.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/141/img-2005-05-21-09-goe-12-ir.html Another April Subtropical Storm Walla! i have found another April Subtropical Storm to go with the other one I found months ago. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/2005/101/img-2005-04-11-00-met-7-ir.html In additon I also found a cyclonic storm in the Mediterrean Sea +All you're doing is insisting that the piece must be included and given the most weight because it expresses the view you prefer, even though the author has no particular qualification to say anything about the WSJ's reasoning, isn't much of a journalist, gave his views on a blog, etc. This is not a position supported by policy. (talk) (contribs) +"Zee (The Matrix) == No kidding about the reverting back. The assumption that Zee doesn't qualify as a minor character in the ""Matrix"" films is laughable. She's the wife of the pilot, the sister of slain brothers Tank and Dozer, and a fighter in the Siege. If characters like Cas, Sati and Dozer can have their own pages, there's no reason why Zee shouldn't have a page. == " +Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius at FAR I see that you're now quite a bit inactive, but if you happen to drop in, I had to put Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius up at FAR. I see that you brought this to featured quality 3 years ago, so I thought you might like to participate if you aren't too busy. +AfD nomination of China at the 37th Chess Olympiad I have nominated China at the 37th Chess Olympiad, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China at the 37th Chess Olympiad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. +New plant in Ethiopia in 2007 is launched by cadila pharmaceutical ltd. of Modi group and not by cadila health care, correction is required. +" Claiming to have ""phoned up"" and doing your own math to claim they're wrong is a textbook example of violating WP:OR. You don't seem to understand the root of the problem that was raised not just by myself but also other experienced editors. You just can't remove a sourced list from a reliable organization like ILO, regardless of flaws. " +" from Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force/Media and research Forthcoming Julia Adams, Hannah Brückner, ""Wikipedia and the Democratization of Academic Knowledge"", National Science Foundation. 2015 October–December Viola Bernacchi, ""Gender imbalance and Wikipedia"", MSc thesis, Politecnico Milano (also here). Anna Quinlan, ""Wikipedia Has a Misogyny Problem"", Verily, 28 October 2015. Gamaliel, ""Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching"", Wikipedia Signpost, 21 October 2015 (discussion). Emma Paling, ""Wikipedia's Hostility to Women"", The Atlantic, 21 October 2015. Caroline Massie, ""Takeaways from the Guggenheim’s Wikipedia Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture"", Architect Magazine, 16 October 2015. Audrey O'Donnell, ""Q&A;: SU professor to attend Wikipedia edit-a-thon for women in architecture"", The Daily Orange, 14 October 2015. September–July J. F. Sargent, Abigail Brady, ""Wikipedia Hates Women: 4 Dark Sides of The Site We All Use"", Cracked, 15 August 2015. Caitlin Grimes, ""WVU hiring Wikipedian to bridge Wikipedia 'gender gap'"", Campus Reform, 21 July 2015. Carl Straumsheim, ""University hopes 'Wikipedian in residence' will tackle gender gap"", Times Higher Education, 20 July 2015. June–April Anupama Mili, ""'Few Women in Wiki Editing'"", The New Indian Express, 26 June 2015. Emma Reynolds, ""Australians fill in the gaps on Wikipedia"", news.com.au, 11 June 2015. Cyndi Moritz, ""Project Aims to Raise Profile of Women Architects on Wikipedia"", Syracuse University, 1 June 2015. Jenny Kleeman, ""The Wikipedia wars: does it matter if our biggest source of knowledge is written by men?"", New Statesman, 26 May 2015. Bryce Peake, ""WP:THREATENING2MEN: Misogynist Infopolitics and the Hegemony of the Asshole Consensus on English Wikipedia"", Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, April 2015 (published by the Wikipedia Signpost, 19 August 2015). Tilman Bayer, ""How many women edit Wikipedia?"", Wikimedia Foundation, 30 April 2015. Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Mohsen Jadidi, Markus Strohmaier, ""It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia"", AAAI Publications, Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 21 April 2015. Sara Boboltz, ""Editors Are Trying To Fix Wikipedia's Gender And Racial Bias Problem"", The Huffington Post, 15 April 2015. March–January Tyler Hellard, [http://this.org/magazine/201 +Thanks for addressing my comments so quickly. And congratulations on your GA! +" The following was deleted from a DISCUSSION again: ""Rumination, also known as Omar Amanat, is being creative indeed about many aspects of trying to promote himself and deny facts of a family nature about himself, including his religion, that he may consider to get in the way of his ability to promote his business interests. When he claims that ""There is no reliable, published source that states that he has two wives and this is slanderous if untrue"" he uses the phrase ""if untrue"" only because he knows he has had a wedding with Sabiya Amanat and a wedding with Helena Houdova while to-date not having had a divorce from either of these two wives in any jurisdiction where the wedding ceremonies took place or where they reside."" Such deletions prevent the ability for discussions to occur and have nothing to do with personal attacks in as much as I have followed this too. IF Wikipedia articles are meant to be an accurate representation of the subjects then discussions need to be allowed, for otherwise this will be just a soapbox for the likes of Rumination. " +I HAVE REVIEWED THIS USER'S CONTRIBUTIONS AND FIND THE ACTIONS BY ADMINISTRATORS TO BE INDEFENSIBLE AND THE ACTIONS BY 'THEHELPFULONE' TO BE DISGRACEFUL. I HOPE THIS USER HASN'T BEEN CHASED AWAY BY THESE CONTEMPTIBLE ACTS. +All that's going to happen with more discussion is a bigger flood of meatpuppets, vague emotional terms, and general nonsense incompatible with building an encyclopaedia. I could put an RFC out on this article, but the ArbCom virtually never rules on content matters. +" The exact thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Twinkles Gone Wild, so you know. // talk // // " +" anybody feels that is nugget of information should be added to the Limerick article, they can add it in two seconds. Merge notices are for situations when two long and complex articles need to be merged. Here it is a quick decision. Go for it. Dictionary it, or delete it? Merge notices are for where an editor has suggested a merge, no more and no less. Moreover, you appear to have a broken sense of direction. The notice is a {{mergefrom}} not a {{mergeto}}. Both articles discuss the city of Limerick. We don't have duplicate articles about the same thing here. However, the reason that I suggested the merge, rather than outright did it, is that clearly the claim that Limerick is known as ""Stab City"" for the reasons stated needs to be checked. The article, like so many such articles, doesn't cite any sources. With the notice, other editors will come to the discussion, and perhaps they may attempt to verify the article to be merged and say ""That's a load of old baloney! Limerick isn't known as Stab City at all."" and instead decide that rather than a merger, an outright deletion of Stab City for being unverifiable is called for. Or, on the other hand, they may come up with some sources to cite. Either way achieves a better result than just doing the merger. The merge notice is not intended to draw attention to stubs needing work. You could have posted a note on this talk page. Limerick is known as 'Stab City' (or used to be a few years ago anyway) but it is derogatory. There are seperate articles for city nicknames - see Big Apple. Googling '""Stab City"" -Limerick' turns up 1000 sites, including a US band. So Stab City could be perhaps a disambig. It wasn't a stub needing work. It was, and is, a duplicate article, plain and simple. Both articles are about the city. I've pointed this out several times, now. I've also pointed out that the parallel with Big Apple is a clearly false one. You haven't explained why it is 'clearly' false. The Big Apple is a nickname for New York and contains the history of the usage of that name. ""Stab City"" is a nickname infrequently used to refer to Limerick in a derogatory way. The ""Stab City"" article has almost no content, but could be expanded to be a history of the usage of the name. I don't have the time or interest to do this. Another example is Big Easy which redirects to New Orleans, or City of Light which redirects to Paris. If City of Light was an article containing one sentence: ""City of Light usually refers to Paris."" would you put a merge note on Paris too? If it were as superficially bogus as ""stab city"" was: Yes, of course. This process is known as ""asking for the opinions of other editors"". It is a useful tool in some circumstances. Notice that it works. Two editors have already given different opinions here, and a third is forming an opinion. It is possible to ask without adding a merge notice. As you seem to agree that the article is potentially bogus, and that we are now having a discussion about it, I have removed the merge notice. I've restored it. The notice is there not just to get your attention alone, and I wrote ""as superficially bogus as 'stab city' was"". Uncle G, How would you like to progress with this dispute? Uncle G has not replied for 5 days. I have added a one line of text to the article and have removed the merge notice. The Stab City article is inaccurate in any case - the nickname dates back to well before the late 1990s and first arose after an incident in which an Argentinean tourist was stabbed. I think this was in the mid 1980s. I haven't edited the Stab City article as I'm undecided as to whether it's worth having. Merge it now - stab city is unfortunately associated with Limerick but it being regrettable is not an excuse to suppress it, but it certainly does not need a separate article. I agree, merge it now. I can't see a realistic prospect for Stab City to become a full article. I think there's a case for a Crime in Limerick article, but not for one on this piece +. Respect that and move on +I checked it out. Durova is clearly a proxy for Sanchez, and has zero credibility as a Wiki admin. Same goes for Elonka (though she operates via backchannels). Enabled by some of the usual suspects JzG, in particular their actions confirm what many users have been saying for some time about the Sanchez article. There's little use at playing a rigged game, and thank god about 7,500 other sites expose Sanchez for exactly what he is. +Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka There was a dispute between Tamils and me regarding above topic. They wanted to insert few things and after consensus I inserted them to Major disputed areas of Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. But it seems like really stupid reasons resorting to militancy. Audience who don't know about consensus may feel I inserted these details with angry on Tamils and they will definetly suspect the neutrality of the rest of the article. Is there anyway I can link the claims in the article with ANI discussion (consensus). +Humber bicycle There must be a misunderstanding, please can you explain better? Thanks, +I work for Virgin in New York, and can tell you that I have no intentions of promoting this piece of shit store. The managers are ass-backward and corrupt and its head office in L.A. couldn't tell sand from dirt. My additions are nothing more than factualof course I could do what I truely feel I should do and just continuously vandlize the pagebut what would that accomplish? +Earl Merkman Hi Themself. I want to let you know that I've removed the BLPPROD from this article. The article did include a reference from a reliable source and the article clearly indicated that the subject died in 1988. +The JFBurton Issue Hey, what happened to the good catch? lol +"""This user prefers warm weather and has a great tan."" Oh baby, I want to lick all that tan make it all white again. I want to get dirty in your juices and and want you to get dirty in mine. hehe. Baby don't come between me and Edgar. You are a baby gal, aint you? " +" Dear Mr.Slrubenstein. Your point about NOR and verifiable sources is well taken. Accordingly I am providing an official Government of India biography of Ram Mohan Roy from the Press & Information Ministry of India which claims that Roy studied Judaism (in addition to other religions). The URL is http://pib.nic.in/feature/feyr2002/fmay2002/f020520021.html . I do not know if you will recognise this because this same government for many years did not recognise the State (country) of Israel. Of course this only states that Roy ""studied"" Judaism and is not conclusive proof that Brahmoism was influenced by Judaism. However, we find significant similarities between the Brahmo Dharma beej of 1850 and some tenets of Judaism such as Maimonides. You will appreciate that these issues are unproveable and matters of faith and I do not doubt yours. Likewise, I leave it up to you to do the right thing. Brahmos are highly unlikely to claim that they are Jews (of any kind) or distort / vandalise your religion/faith. My Brahmo religion specifically prohibits reviling or disparaging other faiths whilst emphasising strengthening the bonds between *men* of different faiths. I personally have not known many Jews (Judaists) as there are so few in India, I was lucky to have a learned tutor - his name was Ezra - he had a PhD and attended synagogue and I learnt many things from him besides Mathematics. I respect your wishes to scrutinise all the other faiths which claim to have been influenced by Judaism. Sincerely. " +It looks to me that you are misapplying the BLP guidelines but the article is outside my area of expertise. So, I won't call you out on this one. 173.206.249.51 +" I did assume good faith until you proved me wrong, Melbourne. The next time I see you vandalize a page I will label your vandalism as vandalism. If you want to call admin attention to yourself though, that's fine. I feel like some of your more POV edits and your more strikingly obvious coordinations with similarly biased wikipedians might benifit from some administration.  ☎ " +" New Edits on the ""Grindcore"" article Hello, I've written some comments on Grindcore's Talk Page about the new edits you've made. You should check them out. Cheers, " +Article says: A cantor, more properly known as a hazzan, has no formal role in Jewish law. And then it says: Traditional Jewish law restricts hazzanim to be males over the age of 13; the non-Orthodox Jewish movements allow women over the age of 12 to be hazzans as well. If the hazzan has no formal role in halakha, how is it that halakha sets requirements to be one? SJK +" And what criteria do you use to determin which are the ""most-used meanings"", Hu12? " +Image copyright problem with Image:Stella Hudgens, 10.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Stella Hudgens, 10.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ()(Talk) +This is quite literally the most poorly worded Wikipedia article I have ever encountered. I understand that English may have been anything but a native language to some of the contributors, but this article could use some editorial assistance from someone who is fluent in both English and the subject matter. +LISTEN YOU MOTHERFUCKING FAGGOT! STOP FUCKING WITH ME!!! I WILL DELETE ANYTHING I WANT OFF OF PAGES I CREATED. IF YOU DONT FUCKING LIKE IT DEAL WITH IT. I TRIED BEING CORDIAL BUT YOU ARE SERIOUSLY PISSING ME OFF! BACK THE FUCK OFF!!!! +"Now this is a story all about how my Life got flipped turned upside down And I'd like to take a minute just sit right there I'll tell you how I become the prince of a town called Bel-Air In west Philadelphia born and raised On the playground is where I spent most of my days Chillin' out, maxin', relaxin', all cool And all shootin' some b-ball outside of the school When a couple of guys they were up to no good Started makin' trouble in my neighborhood I got in one little fight and my mom got scared And said, ""You're movin' with your auntie and uncle in Bel-Air."" I whistled for a cab and when it came near The license plate said fresh and it had dice in the mirror If anything I could say that this cab was rare But I thought, ""Nah, forget it. Yo home to Bel-Air!"" I pulled up to the house about 7 or 8 And I yelled to the cabby yo holmes smell ya later Looked at my kingdom I was finally there To sit on my throne as the prince of Bel-Air." +" No problem. )   '''''' ♠ " +" I am very sorry that I came across as being harsh. I usually like to get right ot the point and for many people it can come off as being abrasive. Please feel free to submit more bug reports in the future! @ " +Thank You! For correcting the singles certifications for T.I.; because I was just too lazy to go back and correct all that vandalism. So yeah thanks again hun ) +"You are a bot. And the person behind this bot is paid actual money by article owners to keep their articles from being edited. This is the key flaw in wikipedia- a handful of people and bots have permission from the site to basically lord over everyone else, and they accept payment to ""protect"" pages. " +This GA nomination is extremely likely to fail. At the moment I'm not sure it deserves its B rating. +GET IT? 206.124.6.222 +" About religious zealots attempting to delete the truth Despite your delirious notions that homosexuality is a ""disease"" to be ""cured"", the fact of the matter is that it isn't and it can't be, the more scientific studies are done on the subject, the more your lies disintegrate when exposed to the daylight. Anyway, if you could please not resort to your usual behavior towards the truth, which is usually trying to delete it when it doesn't serve your purpose, I would appreciate it. Anyway, the reason I reverted CC80's edit is because this is a section devoted towards ""Behavior modification"", I really don't see how it's ""unbalanced"", it mentions the techniques that have been tried (and failed) to ""cure"" a ""disease"" that doesn't exist, and I cited it properly with respected organizations, such as the APA. Thank you, good night, and may the Flying Spaghetti Monster bless you all. " +Regarding edit] inthe Xmen article. If you can produce a substantial reference to validate your edit it would be allowed. I doubt you can. Thank you and good editting! 200.78.138.53 +Not only is the list not necessary, it is ridiculous. Because it incorporates a POV term which must be uttered precisely by the MSM western English language media to validate an entry. This is so ludicrous that only a Wiki-Admin could believe such a list would not produce the most extreme bias. As it did. +/s and (1500 byte)packets +Radar/Unusual You Zach, could you comment here? How's the tour article going? +I appreciate your feedback. Please read my user page the mix up with dyanga's comment was completely inadvertant, if this is what you are referring to by my subsequent actions. +" I agree with David J Johnson and BMK. No one cares about your internet speed except you and the other people who use your internet router. (give him tirade • check out damage) " +Yes, no problems. Thanks for the bold section. Very rarely have i usede capitals. After being personally abused by another editor iss246 for almost a year I was using capitals on a number of occassions out of frustration. Only human. Won't use capitals again. Will also read section on bolding as i often see very experienced editors using bold quite often. But thanks will read guidelines carefully. Cheers. +The website is being revised to deal with the **** found here. +[edit]Grapple X Vandalizes Pages He uses inappropriate language to attack other editors and attempt to quiet opinions that he does not agree with. His behavior is disgusting. DavisJune (talk) +" ""Esteban Ballmeirez"" Is the Spanish for his name ""Esteban Ballmeirez"" (or Ballmierez)? " +Montanabw, you really shouldn't be commenting on horse taxonomy or evolution if you admit that you don't have the time or concern to study it. Your implication that Hagerman's Horse is just Equus ferus caballus (Equus caballus) in disquise, for that is almost certainly what you are implying, is not only just plain wrong, it is manipulatively misleading. And I find your comments about 'subgroups' a bit disturbing. It seems as though you believe that subspecies are invalid taxonomic classifications. This is just laughable. If you want to talk about domestic horse breeds go do that on the Horse page. And I can't beleive I have to say this, but you should be made aware that domestic Horse breeds are not of an equal taxonomic status to ancient Horse species. +Mediation of D-Man's Membership Status Hello, I have accepted this case on behalf of the Mediation Cabal. I have left comments here. Please try and remain civil throughout the discussion. +Deletion of Georgia's 7th congressional district Hi Centrx. I noticed you deleted Georgia's 7th congressional district. Was thsi a copyvio (guessing so based on reading your talk page). Just wanted to ask as this article needs to be recreated to fill out the Georgia US Congressional districts. +" ... I honestly don't know what your problem is with me already...but I suggest you quit undoing my edits in the Devil May Cry 4 page. I have done nothing but provide valid sources and official links, while you keep removing them, claiming it as ""vandalism and nonsense."" I don't care who you think you are, but I WILL involve administration if you don't stop this." +- comments by Architecture and Interior Design +" A kitten for you! Love ya " +This wasn't me... This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:Pickelbarrel, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:Ryulong on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bootstoots +" Image stretching The reason I made the pixel 800 was because I found that the screen stretched too much and I have also seen people complaining about ""Why can't you guys fit everything in the same screen?"" Hence I thought that 800px wouldnot detrimine the image quality and also keep the image within the screen resolution. Feel free to revert if you disagree. (talk2me) " +" Russians in Georgia First, here's some statistics (all the Soviet censuses) for Georgia proper, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. It's in Russian but you shouldn't have any difficulties with these tables (Russians are ""русские"" in Russian, just find appropriate columns). Georgia Ethnic Russians appeared in Georgia in significant numbers after Georgia became part of the Russian Empire in 1803 (Kartli and Kakheti) - 1878 (Ajara). There were 79082 and 19273 people who indicated Russian as their mother language in Tiflis Governorate and Kutais Governorate respectively. Dukhobors have to be mentioned as well. As you can see from the census data the Russian population had risen from 83 to the maximum of 319 thousand between 1926 and 1959 and then began to decline slowly to 266 thousand in 1989. Migration and lower birth rates were the main reasons of this decline. Obviously, many Russians left Georgia during the 1990s due to economic hardships (mainly, imho) and other reasons. Abkhazia ..." +It seem's to be written in the manner of a story rather than that of an article. +Effects under £2000 - dated 24th August, 1860. Letters of Administration (with the Will annexed) of the personal estate of Maria Hester Grierson, late of Rathgar-road, County Dublin, Ireland, Spinster deceased who died 2nd July, 1860 at the same place were granted at the Principal Registry to George Abraham Grierson, of the Manor House, Malahide, County Dublin, Esquire the sole & acting executor of Charlotte Dorothea Forster Grierson & the Administrator of Constantia Grierson, Spinsters deceased the universal legatee; +If you're interested in whats wrong with MC, then you probably want the RC post http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=76. Debunking MC isn't part of wikipedia... debunking common myths could be, though. . +" I will take a look at in the next day or so. Cheers. Talk " +References for IQ gaps in other nations I continue my Herculean task to check all our references. Two questions for the cognoscenti below. Please help. 2 July 2005 13:38 (UTC) European IQ The third paragraph of 2.3 refers to a web page (it's also a boo-boo external link and needs to die). The web page itself lists Buj, V., 1981, Average IQ values in various European countries, Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 168-169 Alexopoulos, D.S., 1997, Urban vs rural residence and IQ. Psychological Reports, 80, 851-860 Lynn R. and Vanhanen T., 2002, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, Westport, CT: Praeger. [Online Table] Demetriou, A., 2005, The architecture, dynamics, and development of mental processing: Greek, Chinese, or Universal?, Intelligence, 33, 109-141 I would be happy to link to any of these primary sources instead, and I think Buj is the correct one, right? So I would like the footnote to read: Buj (1981), some of the data can be found at Greek IQ Any objections? 2 July 2005 13:38 (UTC) 15 point catholic/protestant gap In the same section The difference between the neighboring white Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland is as large as the differences between whites and blacks in the U.S.[6] Now, footnote [6] is again an external link (to Myth: some ethnic groups have genetically inferior IQ's (sic)), but that web page is much harder to navigate. What I am looking for is a reference for the catholic/protestant gap. A POV web page isn't good enough for that. 2 July 2005 13:38 (UTC) +Have a close look at the accusations: Russian, well I mean if one takes a look at the POV of pravapis.org website then the Russophobic tendencies of the content there is clear enough. POV pusher. If a rational person takes a look at my edit of this site alone then they would rephrase that as NPOV-pusher. No knowledge of Belarus, i.e. naive. Well considering I have been over 30 times to Belarus and can actually easialy read the language and understand upon hearing it. Lier... oh dear, speak for yourself. Previous scandals. Well then go, file an arbitration and lets see what respectible editors like Irpen, Michael Z, Alex Bakharev and others will say. Actually my only scandal with WP admin was when AndriyK (surprise, surprise) asked to block me following an edit war on a very controversial topic Holodomor, however the admin (JamesTeterenko, actually supported me not him). +" Yes, among those times one was a barnstar she gave me too but is rather hard to draw related conclusion from unrelated events. Belligerence and WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, are two common positions after a block, yes. I will review to see if I am falling in that simplistic behavior. Meanwhile notice that I am not saying that the block didn't make sense. I am saying that it doesn't make sense now. Well, now that I think, the block was done after a post in which I was telling her that if she was stopping with her problems (her problems are not with me or about posting things about me) I also ""forgive her""(=stop hounding her). The block is not stopping me from hounding her, since there is now nothing to be stopped. That is why I think it lost its purpose already. Notice that for a hound there is no difficulty in just moving to the next computer, opening a new account and continue barking. And besides, what time is it? Less than 6 hours before the end of the block? Blocks are to make all continue with the enjoyment of Wiki-editing. Mbz1 went astray from her enjoyment of her usual wiki-editing going into problems that she can not handle but now she is back to the pictures and calmed articles. So I can continue my Wiki-editing, normally. " +Your the thickest, im still in school, and i bet ill come out of school much better than either of you did, so your even thicker than a child. Leso. +Suppression and management of information There is such an obvious effort to suppress and manage information about Sweetest Day on this page it is turning Wikipedia into a joke. +forst of all get off your fat ass and get a job! second of all you need to quit putting false information on wikipedia ok! El Salvador wont have a crime section at all and if it will i will put one in the nicaragua one because nicaragua is the most corrupt and poor country full of thiefs the country is full of crime and i have articles and i will make a crime section for it i el salvador or san salvador has one. dont delete this because your not allowed to delete user comments ;)! +"So you moved the list of maxiseries to ""list of limited series"" I've got only one thought before you go any further... you are man, Steve!! great idea!! keep it real!! " +Thanks. If he does it again, I'm taking him to WP: ANI and proposing an indefinite block on the basis of CIR. Thanks again, . +Sorry but I am just making very little updates. Do I need to discuss before making these updates? Thanks. Sorry again ! +I’m going to cut out your maggot-infested tongue and stick it so far up your polluted arse that you’ll be able to lick your eyes. +Arsenal FAC Hi Nichalp, I had a question about one of your objections to this nomination, so I thought it'd be polite to let you know on here. Hope you don't feel like I'm questioning everything you put on there, it's nothing personal -) Just not sure whether you objected to there being a short paragraph in the article or felt the women's team needed more coverage in the article. Cheers, +The first quote is imprecise, as it allows the implication that her demeanour was part of the reason for her arrest. The second quote grammatically excludes this implication. Also, the use of wiki voice to imply certainty regarding the reason for her arrest is inappropriate. I don't know why your not seeing that. Your third quote removes the unintended implication, but retains the unwarranted and somewhat offensive authoritative tone regarding the reason for her arrest. It is also significantly longer and doesn't read as well. It's barely if at all an improvement on the first quote (though it removes the grammatical shortcomings) and far worse than the second quote, which I still don't see any problem with. +" IMHO, ""Movable Type"" is not OSS, because it requires a fee for commercial use Why is CityDesk in the Heavyweight (>15000$) category? It's 299,- per editor, and clearly aimed at small to middle companies. Isn't MediaWiki also a CMS? -J" +" Oops, I was on the same track but going in the opposite direction. I just put the Ikotos County hook and credit into the now-empty Prep 1. I will take it out of T:TDYK again. We had an edit conflict when you moved Prep 1 to Queue, I was adding yet another French hook to it, since it will by ""up"" during daylight hours in France on July 14. It is the Picasso hook from the Trocadero Museum; there is already a different Picasso hook in Prep 2. I swapped out the Thomas Thynne hook to make room, and moved the quirky fur teacup to the end of the set. So it looked ike this: ... that Jean Thurel (pictured) was a soldier in the French Régiment de Touraine for more than 90 years? ... that Picasso said he discovered ""what painting was all about"" after seeing African art in the Paris Musée d'Ethnographie du Trocadéro? ... that detailed drawings by French explorer Louis Delaporte guided the reconstruction of Pha That Luang, a major Buddhist temple in Laos? ... that the world has been divided into 11 constituencies for French residents overseas to vote in the 2012 legislative election? ... that Sam Stein won his first World Series of Poker bracelet at the 2011 World Series of Poker but his largest single-event prize was a result at the 2011 PokerStars Caribbean Adventure? ... that the vocals in the music of Nier are sung in versions of French, English, and Japanese after 1000 years of language drift? ... that conversation in a Paris café inspired the Surrealist sculpture Object (Le Déjeuner en fourrure), consisting of a fur-covered teacup, saucer and spoon? But I don't think I can edit Queue because I am not an admin. I wish I were one, just so I could do that, but considering I'm not very good at Prep yet it is probably a very good thing I'm not. '''''''''' talk " +" Why do you call it an ""ip"" address? It's obviously ""IP""..." +I'LL SAY NIGGER IF I WANT TO BRO +Hello Uketpat Thanks for the notification. I believe however that this article fulfils the criteria for inclusion on wikipedia. You are free to google search on the name of this notable personality who is a source of inspiration to many downtrodden young Africans. An extra-ordinary figure in the democratization of the continent and a major player in the worldwide democratization movement of the late 1980s. We have seen many stories about figures in the democratization struggle of Eastern Europe which are not as compelling as this celebrated in the global media. We read of the heros of Tianamen....this is one of the heroes of the Nigerian struggles that claimed more victims that Tianamen and was languishing in Jail at that same period. A second review will be much appreciated. i left you a message over 4weeks requesting a proof reading to be sure its ok to 'go life' but didn't get a response. +except for vandalism, which is what you are doing. +Sorry I forget to sign my Talk from time to time. (I hope I am not talking to a robot now? -) +Please link up any previous report regarding the same BLP and related issues. +Hoffa Hoffa Hoffa! Buried in a brick! Why talk to elevators when no marbles are present? +Dude you can't vandalize the sandbox why do you keep reverting my edits. anything goes in the SANDBOX. +d15b8 - know anything about it? Dear a-hole, why can't you just leave me -and my D15B8 engine edits- alone? +" Gordon Atkinson Hi, thanks for your work on Atkinson. Unfortunately the article had been riddled with vandalism the day before by a random IP. As it wasn't picked up, your valid corrections were mixed up with bogus nonsense. I reverted the vandalism, but as I don't know the subject's life and work I can't properly re-add your work. I suspect that your impulse to edit the page came from seeing the vandalism in the first place. You could, perhaps, copy and paste your text back in with not so much difficulty as you know what's what. Thanks and best wishes " +January]] 2006?|article=Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership}} +You used false and misleading edit summaries more than once which shows a WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality on your part. This summary claims that you reported vandalism so it is immaterial whether you had or not. In this one you claim that there was consensus on the talk page for your edit when there clearly wasn't AND you claim that you notified an admin which is also a false statement. These are not the actions of someone acting in good faith and they clearly justify the notice on your talk page. |Talk +I've nominated this series of articles for dyk (+recently the created M. of Nicomedia). If you have alternative suggestions about the hook or any ideas for a picture I'm always open to your ideas. +Dear Andrew,Please reconsider your disgracefully uncivil tone, since you only sound grumpy. Engaging in a civil fashion with those with whom you disagree costs nothing, and is the sign of a lack of grumpiness. Please pause before replying to people who are lacking in sanity in future.Best wishes, +Oh poor baby RE: User:Arcayne Good, I hope they ban your ass, you stupid fu** +you are worrying about your own concerns ...if you get offended by the removal of pictures than who cares....!!!i give a damn about these pictures. these fake images has nothing to do with prophet muhammad & with islam. Grab and post whatever you like no one cares for that but dont reveal Islam in a wrong way & that is what you guys are doing.even every muslims knows about that non neutral article which is also been edited very poorly & without authenticity. but no one is caring for that, like, how many people will get offended and are being offended. +" I just tried editing the article but my changes were not accepted. I wasn't sure where to ""appeal"". The information on the current article is incorrect, contradictory and should be corrected. Please let me know how I should go about doing this. 218.186.17.237 " +":This is my second message on this topic. You are currently engaged in a revert war over a link that you have not made a single arguement on the talk page to justify or remove. Your only arguement currently has been ""We have an article on the timeline. I'm not sure we need a link here at all. Tom Harrison Talk "", which is not based on any policy or guideline. WP:EL does not require the link to contain information not in any other Wikipedia article, but to contain information relevant to the current article that could not be covered in it once it reaches Featured Article status, which CR does. CR provides a more detailed timeline then can ever be provided inside the article, and further that is shown simpyl by the existence of a timeline article. If th einformation in CR could be included in the article, we would not have a split off article obviously. So I ask you to participate on the talk page and use Wikipedia guidelines and policies to make your arguement as it would be more pursuasive then simpyl reverting without explanation based on more then personal opinion and feelings. Thank you. " +Talkback Received a message from Willscrlt on my talk page about a problem with using linked names in the newsletter. Please review, and feel free to provide input. Thanks. (talk) +" Swami Nithyananda Man, I should have seen your face when you saw that your proposal to oppose the move of Nithyananda was sarcastically denied by the Admin...LOL Dude you are pathetic.I think you and ringess like playing the role of devil's advocate.But your are no Pacino or even Reeves.I bet you dont even have a gf now.Must be a loner. And btw I am not vandalising your page. ) Just expressing my thoughts about you. (YOUR PROPOSAL TO OPPOSE THE MOVE IS DENIED) This is the first step dude...You will face lot more.. And btw I was rolling on the floor laughing when I saw your post requesting the admin ""Please revert the move.Consensus has not been taken""....and when you see it did not work you said ""Can I report your to somewhere for appeal..""... Man yuo are pathetic...:)" +Corspefucking Art I used their offical website as help to gte al information right. Therefore, some sentences were left, but also other material was put in. Meaning it isn't again copyright law as this is my own work via help from the band and Metal Archives. aka I put them together...meaning they have different copyright laws to their biography (even if they do) than this one here. So, if anyone wants to help, delete some and put it in wikipedia's OWN words, your welcome, but it took me 2 hours to read through information to do this, and if it gets deleted I will be mad. +Motorsport infobox OK, I agree with what you are saying. If the information is available then it should be added. However, when I went to add the template to British Formula One Series, I couldn't find any data about any teams in the series. I know which drivers ran which cars, but not the teams that were running them. I suppose I could add a question mark or something like that for those fields. I can add constructor and engine info, but I'm not sure how relevant it is, being as most of the cars were second hand. I realise making the change to the template was a bit bold on my part, without considering why those fields might have been left. You are welcome to revert the changes back. +" Concensus on this and at England has been for the escutcheon of the original arms to be used in the info-box. We have had a stable situation on this issue for months and the change being suggested was discounted on several previous occassions: Talk:Scotland/Archive_20#Coat_of_Arms Talk:Scotland/Archive_4#UK Coat of Arms or National Coat of Arms? Talk:Scotland/Archive_4#Scottish Arms or UK Arms - discussion at UK wikipedians' Talk:Scotland/Archive_4#Edit war - coats of arms - RfC If people insist on placing the version of the UK arms used in Scotland in the info-box to symbolise Scotland then perhaps they'd be good enough to alter the info box at England and Wales and argue their case for change at those articles also. Furthermore, so as to avoid any confusion, why not change the name of this article to ""Scotland (United Kingdom)"" just so as to avoid any possible confusion? Would those pushing for change like to alter the Kingdom of Scotland article info box to reflect the arms used up to 30th April of 1707 also? " +" GlassCobra's RfA My RFAHey Lara! I wanted to drop you a line to thank you for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I also wanted to wish you luck in your RfA, and I fully expect you to see you joining the admin ranks in a few days! I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any backup or second opinions! Cobra 's RfA thanks! Thanks for supporting my RfA, it closed today with a final tally of 39 supports, 1 oppose and 1 neutral. As always, if you ever see me doing anything which would cause you to regret giving me your support, let me know. henrik•talk Thank you bunches! Thank you so much for suppporting my RfA. I was promoted with a total of (44/1/0) - a vote of confidence from the community that I find humbling and motivating. I will not abuse your trust. Look forward to working with you! ( ) Rememberance Day Talk page Rfa talk Thanks. You're welcome. ''''''Love Specific anchoring to page locations Hi Lara! Yes, the way you can link to specific places in an article is pretty simple in the old html only days (when I started writing code) you had to use but since the anchor type tag is disabled in wikimedia, you have to use and by using this ID, it means you can link to the spot by using Foo#lorem ipsum. Another way you can do this is to use the template, which can be hidden into a header line, or embedded anywhere within an article. I hope this helps! linca OhanaUnited's RfA Hello Lara, thanks for voting at my RfA. Unfortunately, the result stands at 51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in featured portals during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in featured portal candidates to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in Good articles. I'll talk to you more about this on MSN, ok? Have a great day. Talk page No one expects a Pigman admin! {| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: lightblue;"" |rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" | |rowspan=""2"" | |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; ve +" I have, many times, thank you, but at the time of the message above, there was no proof that anyone on that blog was an expert.— dαlus Contribs " +Thanks... ...for reverting vandalism on my page. I was even sitting there, watching their contibutions, and you STILL beat me to reverting my own talk page. My second vandal in two days; I must be doing something right. (talk) +blocking will stop nothing, acting like you're the one in favor here eh, admins like you are the problem at wikipedia using powers to please yourself only. +I plan to wait a few days, for more comments, before any renaming. +Knowing that our software comes arunning - BDell555 says exactly the same thing I do but he gets away with it ( he writes in far better English than I, maybe why ). Not wanting to get him in dutch with you boys to be sure, but his stuff almost paraphrases mine - of course he probably never gets into the AIDS stuff - check out the average age of death for gays 39/AIDS 42 or 43/nonAIDS. Why the 43 for nonAIDS - let Mastcell mull that one over - put his medical research phd to some good use. He/you might want to check out the 39/42 vs 75+ statistical tests with one of your math friends, there are a couple of competent ones here on wiki. +WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding +" onus - wrong word? From the article: He acquired the cognomen Brutus, ""Dullard"",[7] by playing the pleasant fool so as not to attract the king's onus. Onus usually means responsibility. It has a couple of other, related meanings, but none seems appropriate here." +" RE: NO ONE agreeed to that cruftastic version; it was AfD'd for additions like that a long time ago. You have no good reason to support the addition of such edits. ♣ Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ " +Wow that really was kind of dickish and definitely pointless. Cheers!! - +External web links within main body of text removed +Thank you for experimenting with the page Feces on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - +In Bartlett's Famous Quotations, p.786 (entry for Eleanor Roosevelt), it states: It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness Motto of the Christopher Society +" In popular culture section, Dec 2011 I have commented out this section for now. Of these items, no of the references provide any indication that they are notable occurrences of Krampus in popular culture. Cites are primary, and to non-RS websites like YouTube. (Talk) " +" meat from dogs or canids? ""Canines"" is ambiguous. And the link did not help resolve it. Does it mean meat from only dogs, or wolves and foxes and such as well? Because ""Canine"" is a common synonym not only for dog, but also for Canid. So maybe the first sentence could still use some work, but I don't think ""dog meat refers to meat from canines"" is the answer. " +I see the correct date was October 13, 1993. Thank you so much for finding this reference! Good work! +" Alright, I can agree to that. But just so you know, your statement of ""We're Wikipedia, not Britannica; a little silliness for the sake of brief moments of brilliance is not illegal."" is untrue. The purpose and use of userboxes has been but up to scrutiny as of late, and I felt that there was no need to add fuel to the fire by having an unneeded userbox. " +Good Ridance! Please take your silly friend BigD with you +To be fayre sam of this stoof maches wot us read in a book by Robert Milligan, culled Scipio to Nero; A study of Roman Politics. Oi now im only a Englander, boot we knows wharrere an abot +" I've got another Barnstar. Yeh. (leave me a message!) " +Oh yeah, and when I said that no one would respond, I was obviously referring to my proposal to change the name of the article. I didn't think you were that stupid, but you obviously are. +It's not just the spokesman- the president of the DLM is also included in that statement. If they can't speak for the organization then no one can. ·:· ·:· +. I am a stupid bitch for blocking this user, but that's just what bitches like me do +Seriously, the vaccine is not useful and not safe. Can't you see a link with the article? Really? +Article on Iain Evans page that says it all Normally I wouldn't re-hash something that's dead and buried, but came across this... http://www.abc.net.au/stateline/sa/content/2006/s1602037.htm - interesting article on factionalism after the election regarding the Liberals. +And your a PRICK TO EMPOWER ASSHOLES LIKE PROPOL +Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. +" Anti-Love Song I moved your information from the talk page to the main article. It looks shorter now, but I kept everything. The main reason it is shorter is because phrases like ""from Raven-Symone's fourth album, Raven-Symone"" just become ""from the album"". This is the right way to handle singles that never charted. They don't get an individual article, but there's nothing at all wrong with putting the infobox and description in the album article. We haven't been working well together, but I'd like to try and change that. I can see that you are an editor that wants to do things right. Unfortunately, part of doing things right is to not create articles that fail guidelines. The guidelines for article creation on singles are at WP:NSONGS, which I kept pointing at every time I redirected one of these articles or nominated it for deletion. Following guidelines is important, and, if you do so, we should get along much better.— " +what part of Help:Table are you talking about? +Okay, why is there a wikipedia article on video games in the first place? Who even cares about them? +" Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast {| style=""border-spacing:2px; margin:0px"" width=""90%"" {| class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid black; background-color:#FFF; color:#FFF;font-size: 90%""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""background-color:#dff2f3"" ! Hello, Eriken. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. (talk) |} " +oh, yes, - the Kurds 'the largest stateless people in the world' , - 'in Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Iran - uncomfortable place to live , geopolitically, but they've been there a very long time ' - Sayer would wear a Kurdish flag, Christopher Hitchens did after all, fine 92.3.10.13 +I say lets go and remove it, John did a good job to it. +OK thus I start the poll with (I got the permission from the former message to put the preference]] Poll Vote for moving page to Giovanni da Verrazzano: move move Talk (see before) +If memory serves correctly, we had a pretty detailed discussion about this incident a few years ago. I think the consensus at that time was that the section was necessarily that long because of the complex sequence of events regarding this incident. If any of the information were left out, it would impact (change) the significance of the event. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) +Lovibond, do you mind taking a crack at a better explanation for color balance then? I don't think I properly understand the term as you're discussing it here. jacobolus (t) +Examples Someone who has not seen this 'alphabet' used in practise before could conclude from the table and the examples provided that it is a more or less fixed transliteration system for Modern Standard Arabic. In reality, however, it is almost always used to transliterate spoken Arabic, i.e. dialects, and there is an enormous amount of variation. For example, contrary to what the table suggests, both س and ص are usually represented by 's'; the distinction by using a capital 'S' for ص looks very neat, but I have never seen it in use. I would therefore suggest to provide more realistic examples, such as: (Lebanese) kif/keef sa7tak, chou/shu 3am ta3mil? weyn baddak nitghada? etc. Maybe it should also be noted that - in parallel with Arabic writing - there is a tendency to omit vowels.79.219.118.88 +Formal Definition The Dunning-Kruger effect is the formal definition of an idiot, in my work experience anyway. +Just added more accurate pictures of him that's all. In his younger days! +" An operating system may provide facilities for constructing user interfaces, such as a graphics display driver or a keyboard driver. However, what we now call a ""user interface"" (such as the Macintosh or Windows user interface) is a congeries of libraries and application programs which use those OS facilities. A Web browser (like Internet Explorer) or file manager (such as the Macintosh Finder) is only part of an ""operating system"" when that word is used as a marketer or product manager would use it, rather than as a computer scientist would use it. These are distinct uses of the word, just as ""set"" means something different to a collector (as in ""Collect the whole set!"") from what it means to a mathematician. " +Blocking for 3RR This is to stop revert wars. The revert wars had ceased, I wanted some help to contribute to Wikipedia. I unblocked Kim after securing a promise not to continue the edit war. Based on their previous actions, I accepted this. Any admin can do this, if they feel that the problem is resolved. This is all I have to say. - +FUCK YOU YOU ASS HOLE! FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111 +Notability Exactly how notable is this really? We shouldn't be acting as plot summary and their involvment in this group could be mentioned in their own articles. I am going to recommend for deletion. +This is why I remove aggressive comments from my talk page.. +, 19 May 2006 (UTC) They debate, they don't vote. Drini 05:27 +Irvine22 Disruptive editor ANI request I've made an ANI request to look into the actions of Irvine22. The request can be found here. I would appreciate it if everyone involved, regardless of your opinion of Irvine22, could leave some feedback and give your experiences. In particular, I found the process of tracking down and documenting instances of disruptive editing to be prohibitively time-consuming. If anyone could assist in this regard I would be much obliged. Thank you. +Thank you for clarifyling Matt Smoral! +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Numbat. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ⊕⊗ " +OK. Fine. But don't be changing it back. Since no question its inaccurate to claim that the current warming is TOTALLY human-induced. And remember I've got two more edits up my slave and will have three more tommorrow +Sourcing is to have information focus cite what is said on article, I have succeed at this point. That's what my changes show. +1. Who claimed this to be the official site of the Northern Ireland assembly? 2. I never been involved in edit-warring. 3. I have been reading the discussion, so yes I am aware of the topic but there does not seem to be an offical Irish name for Eglinton but I am happy to accept the Irish translations for Muff. This discussion was closed a long time ago. +Where is this section, WLU? Your changes must be verifiable. Also, like my last comment, I have no idea where you guys are with this sentence. I see you added page 262 to the citation, WhatamIdoing. Can you say what part of that page supports this sentence, how you were able to link the two together reasonably, etc? Again the key components are (1) shaming comments, (2) appearing unattractive in public, and (3) baldness. Can you let me know what page 262 says (the relevant part)? Thanks. +" Agreed. Boeheim is a genius. I think he's prolly a Christian though. Just sayin. ǀ 76 " +Denise Richards= is JD's girlfriend in this episode denise richards? +REDIRECT Talk:Alexander Valeriyevich Dyukov +" How to change the title of a page Hi, if a page has the wrong title, you mustn't use cut and paste to change it. The thing to do is to use ""Move"" - one of the tabs at the top of the page. That way the page history is preserved. It's very simple... unless a page already exists at the name you're trying to move to, in which case it's a bit more complicated! I'll try and undo the page move you did the wrong way, and redo it correctly. Unfortunately I'll have to get an admin to delete a page on the way - so it won't be instant. " +SPELLED TSAR NOT CZAR For you Americans, it's spelled Tsar NOT Czar, a common mistranslation of the SLAVONIC title Tsar. +", 10 April 2007 (UTC) Say whatever you want BUT Arvanites were Albanians. Your comments are influenced by fascism. Don`t want to offend you but this is how I see it. Example Domitius says to a Serb: Don't you think on some level that it may be best if it's accepted? It will solve the issue once and for all. The ""cancer of Kosovo"" will at last be gone and Serbia will have learned its lesson; in future do what the Greeks and Turks do: encourage ethnic Greeks and Turks respectively to move to ethnically sensitive territories, in other words encourage ethnic Serbs to move to the Sandžak along the border with Bosnia, to Vojvodina along the border with Hungary etc, just to be on the safe side in future. Is it still too late for the government to sponsor a mass Serb migration to the Serb areas of Kosovo to boost the population by several thousand?Domitius 18:19" +" (Untitled) orange please ''''''TALK} No problems. .Bryant three policy proposals for piping links in infoboxes Sorry if this feels like a mass mailout message. It is. Even so, I've put forward three policy proposals for piping links in infoboxes on such pages as diverse as Bert Newton and Louis A. Johnson - here. I'd be delighted if you could consider the three possibilities and then say on the page which proposal you think is best. Cheers and happy editing! |ob I'll have a look, maybe. .Bryant Barnstar The Graphic Designer's Barnstar Thank you for your excellent work on my user page. You don't know how much this means to me. After my troublesome past i feel like this is a fresh start with my new user page btw i noticed you made a bot for jimothy's page so old messages where archived. could you possibly do that for me please? I put that on mate, but im sure Daniel would be ebtter at the scripting than me! TALK Done. And thanks for the barnstar! .Bryant " +Glagolitic alphabet This article states that the Glagolitic alphabet was *devised* by C & M. However, the Wiki page on Glagolitic alphabet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glagolitic_alphabet) contradicts this statement by saying that the Glagolitic alphabet pre-existed the arrival of C & M. I think that, at most, we can say that C & M REvised (not DEvised) the alphabet to include sounds for the Slavic language. +" football I wonder how long it will take for the proxy that i am using to get removed? you see... i am a troll, and i have been clicking random article and doing ""minor spelling corrections"" editing only one word (usually a word that is linked to a page) and changing it to something funny (example- changing fish to shark). And since i am only editing one word, it bypasses the vandalism filters. hahahaha so go ahead and block me, see if i care because i will just find a new proxy and keep doing it. i enjoy making work for reviewers and admin." +As promised, here is a link to the Spine 2008 article which examined neck pain associated disorders: http://www.spinejournal.com/pt/re/spine/fulltext.00007632-200802151-00004.htm;jsessionid=HSQHcPMSkxnTnTkyrPTzcK6LHhry8QKLFyzlh2L2h08vVBxnfBf2!2092430889!181195628!8091!-1?index=1&database;=ppvovft&nav;=reference Of particular importance is the following passage: Vertebrobasilar Stroke Study Findings There was an association between chiropractic services and subsequent vertebrobasilar artery stroke in persons under 45 years of age, but a similar association was also observed among patients receiving general practitioner services. This is likely explained by patients with vertebrobasilar artery dissection-related neck pain or headache seeking care before having their stroke. Hence, there is no difference in association between stroke and DC and MD visits. This suggests that VB strokes are not necessarily caused by SMT or a visit to the DC but that they are already in progress prior to the visit. It should also be noted that there are 2 MDs involved in this study in case the argument of bias comes up. It will be interesting what CynRN and the stroke fear mongers have to say now that the evidence disputes their beliefs. +I blocked you anyway since you're clearly not here to contribute constructively. (talk) +)\ Wikipedia is collapsing under its own weight. There are too many users, too much public acess and too many dummies trying to run the sight that don't have a clue what they're doing or where their diapers are. I have frequented this sight as a registered user for many years, and although some expansions are nice, it is headed downwards. I DEMAND that major reform occure before Wikipedia illegitimzes itself as a true source of information in the eyes of the real world.-( +"::I am finding difficulty with the reasoning of people who (1) support extending the ""troubles"" sanctions to Irish articles not related to the troubles (which I do not support, btw) (2) but then when to restrict the extension to articles about Ireland only, as if the troubles in Ireland were unrelated to Britain! At least Elonka is consistent in her approach. " +" What the fuck are you talking about? I removed nothing. I merely pointed out that the claim that the germans called this program the ""Woofan SS"" was false with a ""dubious"" tag and explained on the talk page. No source says that. I presume the problem is that this website by many people whose grasp of written English is poor." +OK, here's a few: Inline citations - you can delete the fields you don't need and compress the template fields onto one or two lines, rather than a dozen. In preferences, set it so you get a reminder to leave an edit summary - important for other users. Next to the save page button, there is a preview button. You can use this to see what your edit looks like before you save it. It might be an idea to prepare articles in a user subpage, or even off-wiki, so you don't have to hit the edit button quite so quickly. But generally, things are shaping up. If I get time to look in more detail, I will. +" If your section is not titled appropriately, including no attacking, no aggressive or hostile or ""weasel words"" such as ""motor vehicle"", ""compliance"", ""attorney"", or ""respect"", and an actual description of the actual thing you are actually talking about. If you do not use an appropriate title then your comment will be deleted and 100% ignored in all ways, regardless of the reason for the comment, a staff position of the human or person making the comment, or any other reason whatsoever. If you cannot title your section reasonably and descriptively, then your comment has not and does not exist.''" +Get posterized They see me Wiki They hatin Tryna catch me writing dirty I'm back Mlau0406 Mlau040655 And now mlau7464 Think you can stop me +Wendy Davis Please remember that you can develop a separate section for Davis' early life biography controversy. +" Fayenatic, this user is globally blocked from editing. Their only hope is WP:CLEANSTART.— ChatOnline " +U R OFF OF MY BUDDY LIST +" NPOV (August) Viriditas objects to the inclusion of notable points of view because they are purportedly just ""politically motivated attack pieces."" This is untrue, as anyone who reads all of the sourcing I gave can verify, but it is also irrelevant even if it were true. The film itself is a politically motivated attack piece, and Moore acknowledges as much. It's not the case that only left-wing points of view qualify for inclusion under the NPOV policy. The points of view that are omitted are considerably less fringe than WBAI radio, whose point of view of the importance of the film is given a full paragraph. The way to comply with NPOV is to comply with NPOV, and include all notable points of view, and to comply with LEAD, and describe notable controversies in the lead paragraph. " +Since there has been no other input, I will proceed to remove all non-articles from the main page, and place a note for future editor at the top of this page. Your comments would be helpful! +" Research: diligent and systematic inquiry or investigation into a subject in order to discover or revise facts, theories, applications: Dictionary.com. Fact: something that actually exists; reality; truth: Dictionary.com Peer reviewed publication in leading accountancy journal: Extract from peer reviewed article (fact): ""The combination of the Historical Cost Accounting model and low inflation is thus indirectly responsible for the destruction of the real value of Retained Income equal to the annual average value of Retained Income times the average annual rate of inflation."" Extract from peer reviewed article (fact): ""Everybody suddenly then agrees to destroy hundreds of billions of Dollars in real value in all companies´ Retained Income balances all around the world."" Obviously of little importance to you. Obviously of great importance for you are the following; why, I do not know and I do not care. Just sad, really. Especially when this is done on Wikipedia: Lie: ""a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive"" Dictionary.com. My work is not research any more. What I state are facts as verified by the peer reviewed article. Please, do not lie about my work, that is, make a false statement with the deliberate intent to decieve. " +@Taxman and kuru you have absolutely no reason to call that a low content ,see your own promoted websites ->superretirementplans.com ,they have absolutely no content quality. +" Of course, as always. ) – " +, 11 March 2007 (UTC) There is a long section about Jewish reactions to The Passion Of The Christ, this is no different. When a racial or ethnic group is offended by a movie, such criticism should be reflected in the movie's article. 15:45 +" Yes, IBGE does. It gives people some options and people chose them. If the Black woman in the picture reported to be White, she would be counted as White. You should also prove that the source you gave reported that woman to be ""Pardo"". " +Concerning your request for page-protection..... ...I have commented at WP:RFPP, so some input from you would be welcome. +Sorry - it looks like the automatic AntiVandalBot script got confused over the true source of the vandalism last weekend. Just ignore the above message. +"I will try to contribute to this article tomorrow providing I can get the Montevideo article sorted out and I have no more time wasters leaving unsavoury messages on my talk page, obliterating content I've generated or pretend policemen with shiny plastic handcuffs turning up... By the looks of it though you've done a fantastic job (as per usual).. If only we could get all those policemen to leave the force and do the same to articles...♦ Dr. Blofeld " +you deserve it ) there's no doubt that most editors over there are trying to make the article good - but avoiding POV on this one is really, really hard. but you manage to do so. +" The Twelve Days of Christmas I spotted a variant on eBay that showed vol.12 ""The Twelve Days of Christmas"" with the vertical white label texture, so I'm going to list down that volume as December 24, 1991 because they were still using that tape master back in 1991. There's nothing much about it, considering it's holiday release, that means it has just the 1984 FBI warnings & 1986 HV logo at the beginning before the film, but at the end is that Christmas promo for other Christmas films, but doesn't metion the film. It's kinda' like Very Merry Christmas Songs. " +" I'm interested in the idea that the LSE is ranked as ""first equal of the top three IS research institutions in the UK"", but how is this claim substantiated?" +Thanks Nev, much appreciated. That's what I call service, Happy New Year. +I did it! Hooray for me. +This page is sorely lacking in information about wood dry kilns. I know a fair bit about wood drying technology today, but I am not paticularly good at writing. I was thinking of using the sandbox to draw up a rough intial version, and then let someone else make it pretty on the main page... G +" I know that there was no separate Austrian team after the Anschluss of 1938 until 1945 as Austrians played (or had to play) in the German team. Maybe you wanted to talk to someone else?   discuß!     O       " +Replacement Revert the single's cover to the original, because some bastard decided to replace it with a monkey. +Image:L.A.W..jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:L.A.W..jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +Hi Mehran! Notability guidelines for Wikipedia are listed here. Just because it was published in one publication, that is not enough to warrant notability. It needs to have strong coverage in reliable sources - a paper being published doesn't not signify notability, sadly. It should be cited in numerous places, by numerous scholars, in numerous reliable scholarly publications. Perhaps right now the subject just doesn't warrant a Wikipedia article, sorry ( You can always ask for further assistance at the Teahouse, too. +" Possible issue One weird question. The old rumor about the last line of EoE came out as true, and in a rather disturbing interview. The line was supposed to be ""I'd never want to be killed by you of all men, absolutely not!"" but was changed to ""Disgusting"" after a question from Anno. The situation as commented by Miyamura (voice of Asuka) is: At last Anno asked me, ""Miyamura, just imagine you are sleeping in your bed and a stranger sneaks into your room. He can rape you anytime as you are asleep but he doesn't. Instead, he masturbates looking at you, when you wake up and know what he did to you. What do you think you would say?"" I had been thinking he was a strange man, but at that moment I felt disgusting. So I told him that I thought ""Disgusting"". And then he sighed and said ""... thought as much."" He said. "" I thought as much. Original text mirror, archived Now here's the situation. This actually is a very simple analysis - one which I am sure even Wikipedia would allow, but it is of a bit questionable nature. In End of Evangelion, Shinji sees Asuka in the hospital, ends up revealing her body and masturbates to her. Asuka who returns after the Third Impact (questionable prior death notwithstanding) makes the comment ""Disgusting"" when she is laying beside Shinji. Would simply stating the information as presented be acceptable for the meaning of Asuka's final line, the meaning is so obvious that it is not a synth. " +"! This whole thread seems to be filled with the ""Friends of disgraced Wikipedia editor Sitush"" Society !!" +" Your messa... oh, what the hell, Thank you! Thanks for supporting me in my recent time of need. The Chinese character you put on my talkpage does indeed mean ""love""; I would know since I'm from China! (Dramatic irony? Possibly...) But seriously, thank you for all of your lovely messages these past few days. This is the bright side of Wikipedia. I await the future eagerly with open arms, but whatever life throws at me, I hope you will be there if and when I need you to brighten my day P ♥ ed " +Channel 4 On channel four, the part where Marge decides to keep the gun was cut +truth you dont dare to +" Curly Fury Curly Fury Deletion Hello, my name is Nathan Jones, and I am currently in the band called Curly Fury. Please sir, this is a really important page and it would be greatly appreciated if you could not delete the page again. This band really does have a meaning and is not a waste of space. The page was created out of fan request sir, and it would really be appreciated if we could keep it a little longer. Feel free to email me at nathancooperjones@gmail.com . Thank you sir and please enjoy the rest of your evening. -Nathan Jones " +Oh, please, do NOT unblock me, as I've no further interest to contribute content to an organization of Wikipedia's ilk. +swat jester I have reported swatjester to wikipedia. +" Done and done. nableezy - " +" Re: Removal of Steve Holter article I deleted it because its proposed deletion tag had expired. –'''''' | Talk " +How can I help? Anything I can do? +Your DYK nomination of Ismael Urbain Hello! Your submission of Ismael Urbain at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! +Eliminated that sentence. +" Why? I removed that. speaks " +(I'm Christian I don't like the cussing going on.) +He's DEAD. Get over it. +Good God! This isn't an encyclopedia entry. It's a HAGIOGRAPHY. A Hagiography of a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT senator on Wikipedia? Shocked! haha BTW, where is the 3 paragraph section on how she DISRESPECTED a US Military Man in the Senate recently? Oh yeah, I forgot, she's a Democrat and they just LOVE the troops. lol Seriously, where's this? Why so much censorship? You know she called Condi Rice Ma'am in almost the exact same situation. Did Condi not work as hard for her title? Hmmm...maybe Babs Boxer thinks Condy is...you know...Lazy? lol +That's not true at all. Name one area WITH VERIFICATION where that is true. Women do not drop their given middle names to take their maiden names as their middle name. +I don't like Wikipedia, and I wish I had never joined. After I am unblocked I promise I will NEVER login to Wikipedia again. +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (Talk) +Go fuck yourself you stupid bitch go do something better with your life instead of sitting the whole day behind your computer and 'editing' go do something useful and stop wasting power that way you can help greenpeace on wikipedia. +" ""Tamil"" thuggery... way to be racist wikipedia." +Response to Aaron J. Dinkin's Edits I sort of understand about the Midland thing, but where did you get your information about /ay/ and the allophones of /ey/? In HOVOE, which seems to be extremely reliable and pretty new, it says that /ay/ is raised to [ʌe]. I'll admit I thought that was a bit weird too, but there must have been a reason they narrowly transcribed it that way. It doesn't say in that book that the phenomenon that's occurring in Philadelphia is exactly the same thing as what's going on in Canada, so the allophone could be slightly different than that of Canada. It also said there was a general raising and fronting of /i/ and /eɪ/; it didn't say anything about raising and fronting only occurring before consonants. I just want to know your sources for that information. +It only shows you are a vandal because first of all you do not know much about the topic and you have read few books, internet articles and magazines and pretend because you rad few repots to claim the Westen sourcers are truth only because you say so +"Hovercontrol == It seems as though a certain user STILL keeps on being insistant that the link to Hovercontrol be removed from the External Links section. This activity has got to stop. It's quite odd that the first form of flight ever conceived by man was that of a helicopter (Lenoardo Da Vinci's conception of manned flight depicted a helicopter-like device). Additionally, helicopters are a valuable asset to aviation, and assist in saving far more lives than fixed-winf aircraft ever can. Not only that, but the rotor-wing segment of Flight Simulation (introduced in 1998 when Microsoft forst released a helicopter simulation with the Bell JetRanger in Flight Simulator 98) has exploded, and is now one of the most popular components of Flight Simulation in general. Hovercontrol is a valued, and highly revered website that that has led the way in rotary flight dynamics improvements. The days of helicopter-related flight being the ""bastard-stepchild"" in Flight Simulator are long over. I'm not a Hovercontrol website official, or an administrator here at Wikipedia, but I will keep putting up the Hovercontrol link until this unnecessary B.S. regarding the Hovercontrol external link stops. It's nonsense, and it's time Hovercontrol earns the respect it deserves. The IP address you have been reverting has a history of vandalism it seems. I suggest you see if you can get it blocked. On a different note, please see the discussion above as that would remove Hovercontrol altogether. == " +attack continued for five days, during which the besieged families had little or no access to fresh water or game food and +RE Could i ask my what's my personal attack? +Thank you for your question someone had placed Anthony's name (inappropriately) in the early paragraph in place of Lucretia Mott. I think I have corrected the error. +What's ironic, you're actually a girl? 05:46, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC) +hello a mexican bounty hunter wants your scalp - he will pay 500 pesos for it - he hates indios +I agree that it is helpful, the photo is actually taken very near where the backpacker express rip tends to originate on the southern third of the beach looking north. That same rip is referred to in the content above the picture. Thanks for your work. +" added section ""Hoodoo Conceptual System"" I added the above section and two subsections ""Moses-as conjuror"" and ""bible-as-talisman"". My goal was to add some more description to what hoodoo is by discussing some of the underlying symbolism and worldview. I'm missing a quote that I haven't been able to track down, in Hyatt's book vol 1 Hoodoo-Conjuration and soforth, there is an informant who says something along the lines of, ""if I cross someone, and it works, then it happened with God's permission."" This isn't exact but just an approximation. If any of you have access to this book and find it before I do, can you add it and the citation in the sentence marked (citation)? I think Hyatt even mentions this quote in his introduction if I remember correctly. " +Closing Hi. I'm here to close this move request, if I can, but I'd first like to ask some questions. Has everyone said their piece, or are there arguments still not on the table? Do those who support the moves make exceptions for any but the last, untitled, piece? Pending clarification on these two points, I think we can close this request and move the pages. - +how do you delete the wikipedia account? +" It depends whether we want Wikipedia to be cutting-edge. It is clear to anyone studying Time Cube that Dr Ray's discovery of the Ineffable 4-Corner Truth renders him worthy of the positions of Greatest Thinker and Wisest Human; he is thus granted the authority to bestow a doctorate upon himself. The only reason not to recognise this doctorate is compliance with the general stupidity that has precluded rapid acceptance of Time Cube. Well, I myself am not so keen on dumbing down Wikipedia for the stupid and closed-minded people; although some people do seem to be, as evidenced by the censorship of the following material: In late 2004, and in the midst of a prolific period of Time Cube evaluation marked by his creation of new and inspirational Cubic scriptures, Dr Ray took the Cubic disproof of religious concepts to the next level, by solving the major philosophical question: ""Why something rather than nothing?"" The answer, as published by him on his Time Cube website, related to the principle of opposites (in this case, static rather than dynamic/cyclical opposites), an important element of Cubic geometry: ""Between the opposites, all things are created. As an entity, they exist only as a big zero, seen from space as something and nothing from every possible view."" It appears that the religious zealots want there to be a lack of solution for ""Why something rather than nothing?"", so that they can use it as a proselytisation/brainwashing tactic. Thus, when the solution is revealed, they cover it up as part of their efforts to prevent awareness of the Cubic Truth, which, as we know, disproves God and exposes religion as an evil Word-scam. It seems a pity, but in reality, great things don't come easy. We must all fight to break the Word-shackles of religious and Academic-induced 1-corner ignorance, and force teachers to teach Cubicism above evil cubelessness. Humanity's sole hope of salvation lies with 4-corner Cubic knowledge." +My apologies; I was correcting for oponent -> opponent and didn't notice the tool had snagged that non-error as well. (Though it does seem that that sentence could be easily reworded for better grammar and clarityI'll fix that now.) I do my best to manually double-check every correction, but I imagine one does slip past me every 1,000 edits or so. In any case, thanks for calling my attention to it. Cheers, +" First off, I am not sockpuppet. I did create the original edits for the controversy portion as well as removing the ""alma matter"" section as it is misleading and biased in its own way. However, I was not signed in at the time so only my IP appears. Fortunately for me, others have stepped in to help revert your blatant vandalism of Kristi's page. The farm subsidies she has received are well documented facts and are not POV or biased. They are what they are. It's as if I said she was female, and you complained that that was POV. As of this moment, I am reverting the page back and reporting you to the Wikipedia admins. Perhaps they will clear this problem up. Have a nice day." +" Excellent. So you understand it does not mean ""only now and then"". The word for that is ""occasionally"".— " +Objective information = neutral information, at least for me. +Rodeo Song lyrics Well it's 40 below and I don't give a fuck Got a heater in my truck and I'm off to the rodeo And it's allemande left and allemande right Come on ya fuckin' dummy get your right step right Get off the stage ya god damn goof, get off piss me off, fuckin' jerk, get on my nerves Well here comes Johnny with his pecker in his hand He's a one ball man and he's off to the rodeo And it's allemande left and allemande right Come on ya fuckin' dummy get your right step right Get off the stage ya god damn goof, get off piss me off, fuckin' jerk, get on my nerves Well it's 40 below and I aint got a truck and I dont give a fuck cause I'm off to the rodeo And it's allemande left and allemande right Come on ya fuckin' dummy get your right step right Get off the stage ya god damn goof, get off piss me off, fuckin' jerk, get on my nerves Well here comes Johnny with his pecker in his hand He's a one ball man and he's off to the rodeo And it's allemande left and allemande right Come on ya fuckin' dummy get your right step right Get off the stage ya god damn goof, get off piss me off, fuckin' jerks, get on my nerves +"OK. sorry. i dunno about your britain english. i just ""OMG!"" by so many fact tag. However, I appreciate your effort. and i'm not a native english. so please understand me. and if you want delete this section, it is OK to delete this. whole delete is OK. " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Virginia Water. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) " +be discussed in the talk page. +Rutgers revert I agree with your revert. I accidentally edited Wikipedia's entry instead of EncylopediaDramatica.com's Rutgers entry. My mistake. Now feel free to shut up and continue moderating. My edits were hilarious beyond comprehension. +" Support. Conjuring is objectively a conceit, an open pretence that Magic (paranormal) is in use. Magic (paranormal) is the originating concept in this sense. The big question though is: ""Do the masses really care about the original?"" Against my expectations, yes they do. This article gets 50% more hits than Magic (illusion) does. This result plus primacy as the concept behind the names of all the 'spinoffs' leads me to support this. 91.84.47.33 " +", 14 September 2011 (UTC) ""Disagree amicably""???? Did you read the other comments from the admins on the board? There was consensus that he used racist, derogatory, baiting language. I can't disagree amicably with that, I point it out, and say his opinion on the notability of the subject is invalid because he has evidence of systematic bias. Please, don't be an apologist for this kind of behavior. It's very sad. 13:48" +" Support - Asadullah is only two sentences and it describes a ""personal title"" that is only ever used in reference to Ali (no one else is called by this title) so it should reasonably be merged into Ali. Possibly the section ""In Battles"" would be a good spot for it? Tropics " +"make me lost my faith about Wikipedia so-called ""neutrality""" +because i didnt do anything wrong in the first place..you accused me of doing something i didnt so i thought i would just in spite..but harrassement is absolutely pathetic..talking crud. +You are such a useless bitch! I mean do you have a life or friends? Because all you do is sit at your computer on wikipeida. You are a loser and I would watch out because you will be blocked soon! {Talkback|Tdawg4701} +" What are you talking about? What article do you want merging with this one? — I don't think you stated that. Talk Contribs " +Teahouse Talkback reminder +"Futper, I'm rewriten the entry to deal with your concerns of ""flow"". Given the severity of the anti-Macedonia (Greek Macedonians) propaganda issue and how it relates to Greece's original complaint of monopolization of the term ""Macedonia"" by FYROM citizens... I believe that a section is warranted (as was originally present). I will wait till tomorrow to give you an opportunity to provide input before reinserting the section into the article. After that you'll still be free to adjust if you feel I've said something factually inaccurate or something that could be more elegantly worded. " +=Quidditch World Cup In GoF, the Quidditch World Cup wasn't shown in the cinema, but it is in the book. It is possible that it could be on the deleted scenes on the DVD when it comes out in the UK, and I hope it does as it is the best Harry Potter film that has been in the cinema. I wanted to see Krum and Lynch play in the cup, but all it was was a stadium and Bagman talking.Then it just skipped to the camp bit. I did'nt like Krum too much 'cause he fancied Hermoine, and I think Hermoine deserves to go out with Harry. At the end of TPS, when Hermoine and Ron were standg there you could just tell Harry and Hermoine were right for each other. In Gof, Hermoine kissed Harry on the head when he comes out of the water, but in the book it says she kisses him on the cheek at the end of the year near Platform 9 and 3 quarters. I do like Star Wars better though. +I'm not the person who modified that page, but I'd like to note that this IP address is essentially a proxy used by several thousand employees and many visitors via the free WiFi. While we can't bypass the proxy, perhaps you could consider blocking non-logged-in users from this IP address? Thanks and have a wonderful day. 12.186.80.1 +i gave you my source, which you claimed is incorrect. do you have a source for the exact same quote with additional text which you claim is the accurate version? +Daniel or to whom it may concern, Sorry it took me awhile to get back to you. Anyway my general area of intrests is Country Music and Radio and what I would bring to them is accurate information. For example on the Radio articles I would make sure it had enough information like On Air staff or anything that the readers might be intrested in knowing about. and the same thing for Country music I would make sure the Country Music articlss has accurate information that Country fans like myself would like to know About. I hope that made sense for you if it didn't let me know and I'll gladly give you an example. Also, as for a username I would like to change it to Chase24. But Iam not sure if it's already taken but if it's available I would like that as my username. Lastly, I don't know if you're already aware but my whole IP Address is blocked from registering a new account and/or editing. Would it be Possible to lift that block? It is not suppose to expire until I believe the 8th of April but since I admitted I was wrong and Apologized and so fourth I was just curious if it's possible that it can be lifted early. If you have any questions feel free to ask. +off my page and i wasn't even finish with my stuff dumb ass, so why you sending me shit? Replay back punk ass hoe! +Well, I think I've seen it stated someplace that subduction is driving most plate motion on a global scale, whatever an individual plate is doing. If that isn't already sourced in the article it should be. ( ) +i just made this so the talk page exists... any problems, post 'em here! +RE: Commons:MediaWiki:Gadget-GoogleImages.js +He is very much right, the world has woken up to you. You are nothing more then a two-bit huckster perpetrating a giant fraud, give my regards to the boys at East Anglia. +again again again this is not going to stop......hmmmm a personal attack let me think......you are a big poo poo face and smell like a frog +Awww, man... ...this ruins everything! +waste of oxygen Even amongst jerkoff wikiloser admins who have no life, you are a sad sack. Seriously, have ever considered suicide? +I did make a case, I made it to them, now I made it to you. Can't anybody block this guy so I can continue editing other articles and get on with my life? Go read his Talk page, he isnt interested in consensus, he thinks Wikipedia is a forum for arguing conspiracy theories. Ive been through WP:ANI. They didnt help, can you help me? +Untitled thread of 4 September 2006 +Stop vandalising and crystal balling on the madrid page 194.66.216.40 +"Here is an intriguing irony that I propose rewinn consider: Wilson's own ""Op-Ed"" (""opinion editorial) entitled ""What I Didn't Find in Africa"" is the initial impetus for much of the controversy currently surrounding him and his wife Valerie E. Wilson (""Valerie Plame"") and of the Fitzgerald Grand Jury investigation. Is rewinn arguing that one cannot cite and quote from ""What I Didn't Find in Africa"" because it is an ""editorial"" that expresses an ""opinion?"" If not, he really needs to apply consistency in his stance on the inclusion of editorial and opinion articles as reliable and appropriate sources in Wikipedia articles! If the positions taken in the op-eds are evidence of such positions, one does need to cite them. NYScholar " +" it is okay. i still think that, rather than one composed by any particular WP editor that someone on some side might accuse to be a partisan on the other side, that for the very first sentence, a dictionary definition would be more bullet proof. if anyone from any side comes out of the woodwork and says that the definition is skewed to far to the anti- or pro-ID side, we can tell them to take it up with Merriam-Webster or American Heritage or the OED. but i won't object to any defining lead that doesn't by OR and/or POV create, ""out of whole cloth"", a definition that has nothing semantically in common with verifiable existing definitions. " +" Operation Northwords Listing Operation Northwoods as a conspiracy theory is bias and unfounded by the very definition of Conspiracy Theory that this article gives. If a conspiracy theory is a theory involving a ""coordinated group"" which ""is, or was, secretly working to commit illegal or wrongful actions, including attempting to hide the existence of the group and its activities"" then Operation Northwoods does not fit the criteria. First of all, the CIA does not try to keep its self hidden or secret. It is a known agency and the plans of Operation Northwoods are no more a Conspiracy Theory just because they where kept secret then any of its other actions that the CIA plans or performs on a daily basses that are all kept secret from the general public. Secondly, Operation Northwoods was not a conspiracy within the CIA either. Not one CIA member kept it a secret from anyone who should have known about it. It other words the protocols and the chain of command for this plan was followed precisely as they should have been. And because of that fact, it was shot down, the architect of the plan was fired, the plan never took action and it was well documented which is why we know of the plan under the Freedom of Information Act. This is the exact opposite of a conspiracy theory. Conspiracism The section conspiracism says: 'Conspiracy theories are often not taken seriously, because so many conspiracy theories - almost by definition - lack readily verifiable evidence. This phrase is unnecessary to introduce conspiracism and is full of weasel words: ""often taken not seriously"" (has anybody made a statistic?) ""many conspiracy theories lack verifiable evidence"" (how many?) and it happens ""almost by definition""(??) what in the definition states tht the theory has to lack evidence??? If nobody has nothing to comment about that I will delete the sentence above. I disagree with the above sentence - and for sure it is not neutral but guess that it meant that the conspiracy groups hides the evidents and/or create them (vide the 9/11 passport [I don't want to argue was it fabricated - I mentioning that accorsing to some people it was fabricated]). Sequence of sections and bias The way this article is set up suggests a very, very strong POV and it is not even really attempting to be neutral. First problem is the examples, for one they shouldn't be the second thing since it's mainly a partial list. This should be towards the end of the article. Also there is the descriptions: The John F. Kennedy assassination was a plot by people in high places and not the work of lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald. Oliver Stone's film JFK is based on this premise. While this is a conspiracy theory, one I think is somewhat likely, it is actually the most extreme of conspiracy theories in this regard. Other theories were that this was a mob hit or carried out by Cuba or the Soviets. The UFO conspiracy theory is also stated in the more extreme manner. Some theories are that the U.S. government conceals an alien presence because they're afraid of it causing a scare, which sounds more reasonable than, ""to be used for war and other ideas, mainly towards the New World order."" Also the fourth section is almost completely dedicated to explaining conspiracy theories in a discrediting manner, treating them like psychological abnormalities or attempts by confused individuals to make sense of a nonsensical world. It seems to be the most common and most annoying criticism of conspiracy theories. This section also is half of the actual article, with the rest mainly being an explanation of the terminology and even mentions of fictional conspiracies. Very little of this article goes to treating conspiracy theories as a justifiable practice in critical thinking that like all legitimate studies can lead to rather ridiculous theories. For instance, there are legitimate questions about 9-11, such as the $100,000 given to Atta by a head of the ISI. There are also allegations that the 9-11 Commission due to its structure and the associations of its head with the Administration was unable to do a thorough and independent investigation, with it ultimately being little more than a coverup. In every case critical thinking demands some form of explanation or theory for such facts. For instance one is that the Administration is trying to cover up connections between Pakistan and/or Saudi Arabia and 9-11. This w +If however something is still niggling at you and you wish to fully pursue the more bureauractic pathway, I am happy for you to revert (1) my edit (2) propose article for deletion with intent to redirect (3) contact relevant wikiprojects (4) await result of discussion (5) await admin to create redirect. It may be worth doing this as Wikiproject animal anatomy WP:ANAN may have something to add, however in my experience most of these processes result in users who are really not familiar with subject matter reiterating ideological viewpoints about the process with not benefit to the actual article. Cheers +http://twitter.com/therealgokwan he said it @jadeycakess about 3 hours ago... 217.7.207.230 +Love to help out how do I get there +" This is laughably contemptable. ""Just because a character in a film says she's a girl and has breasts, doesn't mean she is actually is a girl! That's original research. Lord help us!"" Furthermore, IllaZilla I haven't included any psychological analysis in the above description. " +Insignias == Hi FishHead, I have a question that hopefully you might be able to help me with. Where it says on your page “Who Am I”, you have all the different insignias listed, and I was wondering…where do I find those? And how did you find one for guinea pig owner? Thanks EKN == +" DavidWBrooks, I would suggest that if you have spent a month intensively editing the iridology entry, it's possible you feel emotionally-invested in the task. It may be better for all if you turn your efforts to more fruitful and productive entries, instead of continually trying to add ""con"" to this ""pro"" entry. It was recently pointed out to me that some of my editions to the big bang entry were inappropriate, because an entry for a subject is the place to support the subject, not to tear it down. The suggestion was made to me that I move my proposed editions to where they would be appropriate, in ""non-standard cosmology"" entries. I now make this suggestion to you. If you seek to criticize iridology, you should not do it in the entry meant to explain and support iridology. Perhaps you can make an entry titled ""non-standard iridology"" or maybe even ""fringe theories about iridology"" if you want to challenge the mainstream iridologists. Just a suggestion, I hope it will help you as much as it helped me. - 16:48, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)" +" Its nickname was ""The Land Between the Rivers."" Read on to find out about this place. Social Classes (for ex: 2nd class...) In Mesopotamia, they have 3 social classes: 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. The kings, priests, and wealthy people were in 1st class (the top). The 2nd class had merchants, fishermen, etc. They don't have wealthy houses, like the 1st class people have. Last but not least, the 3rd class. The 3rd class had slaves. The slaves are for to help and do work for the 1st and some 2nd class people. King Hammurabi King Hammurabi ruled a place in Mesopotamia called Babylonia. He was a very tough king. He was one of the first kings to write laws for his people. But he was the first king to hang his rules/ laws up in every place in Babylonia, so if someone breaks the law, no one can complain or tell they never noticed or read the laws. These laws are called The Hammurabi Code. The Hammurabi Code The Hammurabi code are laws written in stone. Scientists had found a stone of laws written by a priest that was told to write the laws that King Hammurabi said. one of the laws are ""If you kill a father's son in the fire, then your son will be killed in the fire too."" or ""If you steal something during a fire, then you will chop off your hands."" Most of these laws/ rules protect women and 3rd class people." +My Email is now enabled.Preferences Changed. +Advisory Committee Thank you very much for giving me your full support during the Esperanza Advisory Committee Election. I'll do my best to make you proud. ) Acetic' +" ""Mormon View of Jesus"" is redirected to ""The Living Christ"". ""The Living Christ"" could, maybe should, be merged into ""Jesus in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints."" Leaving a redirect behind, of course. - Das Baz, February 7, 2006, 2:30 PM." +6th Guards Army That was a massive expansion of that article - really good work!! Unfortunately I've had to take out Andy Johnson's 1988 guesses about where the army might be - they were totally inaccurate. The army disbanded in the Baltic region in 1947, as Feskov et al makes quite clear. Would you mind please e-mailing me through the emailthisuser function? I'll send you Feskov so you can look up fates of Soviet units after the war. Best regards (talk) +Please do, good suggestion. +REDIRECT Talk:Happy Hour (comic strip) +" Sorry, I am not English native. I have removed the word ""respectively"" (a translation of the French word ""respectivement""), e.g., the one is put in p. 191 and the other in p. 192. (To reply) " +" 1. understand what you have been blocked for, I have been blocked for being someone I am not. Therefore I cannot understand the reasoning behind my blocking. 2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I am being blocked for someone else' damage/disruption, therefore am incapable of ""continuing to cause disruption/damage"" since I wasn't originally 3. will make useful contributions instead. My original contributions were pretty useful. I certainly only ever intend to be useful. 79.75.171.154 " +DEATH DATE IT IS GENERALLY ACCEPTED AS JULY 2ND, AS USUAL WIKIPEDIA PUTS THEIR OWN DATES... THAT'S WHY I TRY NOT TO GET MY INFO FROM THIS SITE... +Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gnanakumar1985/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of +Stop making false accusations please. I was inspired by Hypnosadist's suggestion and am just trying to get a compromise that we can all agree on. +" (UTC) I've updated the translation to reflect the above discussion. The previous translation suggested that ""noblesse oblige"" creates an obligation for others rather than for the members of the nobility themselves. 22:46, 7 December 2009" +" (duplicated from editor's talk page) The material has already been removed; you have restored it multiple times. The copyright process will allow you to ""work on it"" either by verifying authorization or revising without causing potential legal problems for Wikipedia. (talk) " +Tom Butler I'm well aware of Tom Butler's user page. He doesn't quote me out of context, and he is as entitled to believe that I represent what is wrong with Wikipedia as I am to believe that he represents a fatal flaw in the system. He never did seem to get the point of what I was saying, which is a bit sad.— +I've found the cure the cure for gay peole is ... +Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile! +OK - finally did it. I'd be happy to make this a footnote instead, as it is sort of an aside, but I don't know how to give footnotes references. +in the [Domino_Harvey] entry +I'm sorry sir for abusing and breaching the site rules, I thought those who were undoing my edits were not admins so I kept reverting them, I will not repeat this mistake ever again in the future and I will learn more about how Wikipedia works. So may I be unblocked and get a second and last chance? +you're hot i will rape you ;) +" Does that mean we can have the ""estimated that equipment costs would be less than $15,000""'s wording by Bilby at Tropes vs. Women in Video Games? The long quote in the reference was only needed because you insisted on removing this point from the body. " +Oh, in this case it seems that you guys are just blocking me because you do not want me to make any changes which you do not want. If you say that my links are not recognised, then how about yours? It is not convincing as well. I do not need to feel ashamed because what I did, I am doing, and what I will do is reasonable. Please look more carefully with your eyes at the graph which is located in the link posted below. +", 6 May 2010 (UTC) I can't cite an absence here. 05:22" +Harut Grigorian Would you please undelete this page? It's been edited by other people other than the creator and is a useful page about a growing star in the sport. The creator made this before he/she was banned and it's only benefical to the wiki. +Record Keeping Requirements When has this been updated? This does not even match this article here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_Internet_pornography#United_States (A Wikipedia article what about that). +A tag has been placed on Absoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +" I don't understand why you're here. So far you have made only 3 edits that weren't speedy deleted or reverted: a minor typo fix: 05:18, January 5, 2006 (hist) (diff) Dag Hammarskjöld a vote in a Tfd: 06:18, January 11, 2006 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:Infobox Biography (→Template:Infobox Biography) a rejected request for protection of an article: 05:10, January 5, 2006 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for page protection We are trying to write an encyclopedia here. Please take some time during this block to consider whether you want to be part of a community formed for that purpose. If you do, I will welcome you back into the community and look forward more positive contributions from you. If you don't want to be part of this community, please stop harassing other editors and let us get on with our work. If you wish to respond you may do so here or email me, which will get a faster response as I'm on a wikibreak except for dealing with pressing issues like vandalism to my user page. —•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• " +"I will try to remember to log in from now on. As for your point I was trying to pick a fight... balkanfever is the one that mass removing my edits. I tried to have a discussion about it with him on his talk page (he basically ignored me)... at which time I noticed on his user page he had a great deal of anti-Greek Macedonian sentiment (and I still stick by that claim) When I asked him to remove a specific offensive link (that lead to an external page showing half of Greece under FYROM contro)... instead he called up an admin buddy to harass me with claims of ""trolling"". (oh irony of ironies) But to be fair... can you please point me where specifically you think I called ""a whole bunch of people a whole bunch of nasty names""? The only time I can recall reacted with any hostility to anyone was when accused of ""trolling"" out of the blue (and I accused them of bias back)... and someone called me a ""racist"" for stating the that there are 2.5 ethnic-Greek Macedonians (which I also responded in like for denying their existence). Again... do these 2.5 million Macedonians no longer exist? Does that seem consistent with their human rights? And getting back to the original query... is it considered professional for a Wikipedia admin to name call and threaten banning users without even reviewing the other POV? And if not...where would I register a complaint? Thanks again Andrew. (I'd read the reply but won't bother you again as I've taken up enough of your time) I just wish to add... this isn't a minor matter here. If Macedonians are denied their own recognition... this very issue could very well lead to the next war in the Baltics. " +Nirmal See the new Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation page +CRIMINAL You are a criminal you can not change scientific fact. KURDS ARE IRANIANS IT SAYS THAT IN EVERY TEXT BOOK and STUDY. THEIR CULTURE, GENETICS, HISTORY, LANGUAGE, GEOGRPAHY, CALENDER, AND TRADITIONS ARE PROOF OF THIS. DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY KURDS ARE OUTRAGED BECAUSE OF YOU!!! ISRAELIs ARE PROPAGANDA ARTISTS. +Despite the valid and sweeping criticisms of Freud's approaches from the mainstreams of both behavioural psychology and therapeutic psychiatry, i.e. from the fields in which the article claims a god-like status for the man, the article remains largely hagiographic. +Agreed, she is as American as apple pie. +REDIRECT Talk:Emmanuelle 2: A World of Desire +Pavle Kalinić and Nenad Ivanković Nice work on both of these, but as biographies of living people, they need sources. Haven't tagged them as such, but someone will, so you might consider adding sources before the articles get deleted. +You can see why some newspapers get it wrong. Their journalists are told to do it the wrong way... http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=70391&id;=100000179702430 +.Furthermore, Shell is not exactly an uninvolved admin. She has been mediator in an unfortunately failed mediation on this matter +why don't you just fix it? Why the fuss? 06:06, August 27, 2005 (UTC) +November 2006 (UTC) Dear Rev. Michael S. Margolin, is it bias to put Controversies on the Christian article? On the Muslim? On the Morman? Accept it, nowadays there is nothing that doesn't carry contriversy. If every other religion doesn't carry a contriversy, why can't yours? - 04:11, 20 +, like Bono has KBE at the end of his +If you're going to talk that way, please refrain from interacting with me further. Thank you. Talk +Where are all these rules coming from? Do you just make them up? What does controversial have to do with anything? Either it is accurate or it is not. I have cited Wikipedia's own definition of hate groups. Conservapedia CLEARLY fits that definition. Why is it necessary for a third party to confirm that they fit the definition? Why is it necessary that they receive sufficient attention? Again, either it is accurate or it is not. +" It should not be moved to responsible recreational drug use, because the term, ""responsible drug use"" is already well established terminology within the harm reduction community. It is not our job as Wikipedians to establish new terminology. The established Wikipedia convention for removing ambiguity is a parenthesized suffix, which is why I suggested Responsible drug use (recreational) if any move is to be involved. " +Seriously? This pathetic need to restore little American flags is so sad. Is your patriotism so threatened with their removal, or is it some other deep seated insecurity? 50.159.28.153 +" C Status & Photo Peter, I appreciate the feedback. Can you explain what ""C"" Status means? Excuse my ignorance and I have photos of Park which i own the rights to so I could choose one. Better to have a Bio or action shot?ALLNP " +I put it on the history the best I could you cunt. Now go fuck your mother. +" ""Megafauna"" is in this case used to refer to the corals on the seamount. As far as I know everyone of these megafauna is some ancient coral or other. They grow quite large actually, to around 2.5 meters. That's why I focus on corals; and the only reason I use that yes, slippery term is because the ref uses it, and it's definetly reputable. Mar " +" Re: User talk:71.242.178.21 (Cathedral) 1. I do have a user name, I was temporarilly signed out. 2. I did not do anything to the pictures in the cathedral article. All I did was add a space between the words ""and"" and ""Rouen"". 3. Perhaps you meant to send your message to User talk:172.200.41.243? I suggest that in the future you check twice before handing out accusations. YankeeDoodle14 " +Sorry for the delay. '''''' talk +" Nancy Pelosi is a high ranking official of an anti-American terrorist party (also known as the ""Democratic party""). She is currently involved in a number of projects designed to undermine and destroy the American people, the largest of which being the ""health care reform"" which is scheduled to pass in late 2009. This plan is designed to break Americans financially and force them to rely increasingly on government intervention." +Shut up! Are you Indian brother. i AM FROM tAMIL nADU. iT TAKE SPECIAL INTEREST IN ANNOYING PEOPLE. i AM GOING TO hARVARD. sO SHUT UP! i AM BRAHMIN! sO SHUT UP! oH yEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +I thought it was the latter, but I'm not sure. I get the impression the former is for pages that are not dedicated to a fringe theory, but give it an WP:UNDUE amount of attention. I imagine it potentially being used on the Historical Jesus page. +blurbdom I'm not sure we need to lavish so much praise on Mr. Mason in one little encyclopedia entry. This is not the space to plug his criticism, and just because the lauds are official quotes doesn't mean they should be in the entry. Like.liberation +This argument is pointless and growing pathetic. Please do not continue this. I may not agree with everything either of you have said, but my personal opinions do not matter. +" Flying Tigers legacy in song, other tributes Recently a section was removed with the concern that the information was ""dodgy"" regardless of the inclusion of cites and reference sources. Before further revising of this section, a discourse should be attempted as to the authenticity of the original submission. On questions such as these, when an editor has supplied text resources, a WP:AGF is usually sufficient; was there a concern that the material was not verified properly? FWiW ." +Sounds like a violation of WP:SOCK to me. Unblock declined. — }} +that any infringement exists +Most dental fluorosis cases are mild, so the mild case is more typical. Cases such as the one shown in the severe image are quite rare. There's nothing questionable about the mild case; many cases are milder than that. The Colorado brown stain came from water naturally fluoridated to levels well above recommended levels, and it was more severe than what is typically experienced nowadays. Today, most dental fluorosis (in western countries anyway) comes from too much toothpaste. +What policy am I not going by? Is there some rule that says I'm required to suffer stalking and harrasssment by you? If so, please point me to that rule. If there is no such rule, LEAVE ME ALONE! +one final msg Seth, you have potential....to be a cocksucking faggot. get the fuck off wikipedia and find something productive to do, you little assclown +No, does it still say so or was this re-added? +Have you seen this? Tony, Have you seen this? — +" Elizabeth I was referred to as Elizabeth I ever since the 16th century! This is absolutely not a modern convention. Please refrain from talking about subjects you seem not very familiar with. As for the Chinese case, Liu Bang and Xiang Yu were commoners, and their family names were used with their given names. I believe by 210BC family names were starting to be commonly used in China, and if you check the Historical Records (史记) by Sima Qian, he refers to them as ""Liu Bang"" and ""Xiang Yu"". On the other hand, the royal family of Qin were not commoners, and their family name (ancestral name, 姓) was never used. You can check the Historical Records of Sima Qian, he never writes ""Ying Ziying"", he always writes ""Ziying"" only. It is a modern anachronism to write ""Ying Ziying"". It would be like writing ""Louis Bourbon"" instead of writing ""Louis XIV"". " +DYK for Apollo Hotel Amsterdam  — +Volt marketing How about blow the current redundant para away, first of all. I think the Volt has been an interesting marketing exercise, but have not read any analysis of it /as such/ in a RS. So just lose the whole section for the time being. I wonder if anyone has done that for prius, which must rank as one of the most successful automotive marketing exercises for a long time. +I added another source for this reference. The other source is Lauren Tenney, published on the Web site of the New York State Office of Mental Health. . +" AB - disambiguation style Thank you for your work on AB. Unfortunately, disambiguation pages do not follow the same stylistic rules as normal pages. Please see the disambiguation style guide for more information. If you have any questions not answered there, or try the help desk. " +" References While it is understandable to ""expect"" a reference after quotes or explicit information, it is also Wikipedia policy on sourcing for controversial information to be referenced, this does NOT mean that editors need to drive-by tag start class articles with reference tags. The vehicle is very famous and a simple Google search would even show that auction prices have been phenomenal because of the rarity. Anyway, multiple sectional reference tags, especially on a start article with general references, is a little overboard. " +You peice of irish scum How dare you talk shit about my country? Fuck you, stupid shamrock bitch, I hope the next genocide we serve on you wipes your entire disgusting, repulsive race out. Fucking micks, you shouldn't even be alive after the first attempts, hopefully next time you wont be. Die. 92.24.85.159 +Good News Translation: Thanks! Thanks for moving to the top the renaming of the Good News Translation in 2001. When I was researching the re-write for the article, it amazed me that there was so much confusion as to the name of the version. Zondervan appears to have switched names; the Bible Society still seems confused (If you see one, it still has GNB/TEV on the cover and on the title page). - Thanks, ''''hie | +Also, there sould be a separate section added concerning the all too common negative side of the surgery. Often, severe psychological trauma is suffered by recipients of CS, where the outcome is unsatisfactory, or ruinous. - +Freud is a distinguished Jewish person of great achievement, which is why it should be mentioned. MLK did many achievements, and his article mentions he's african-american, so I believe this should mention Freud is Jewish. +Hello You are a racist! From 108.67.65.222 +The link to slovo.bg did not actually point to a full version of the text in Bulgarian. For this reason I changed the description. If someone finds the full text please put a link. 193.190.253.147 +Hey finnie, you know what aggie can't believe? She can't believ an admin has finally called the bullying bluff you guys both use. That is assuming it is 'you guys' and not simply 'you'. I also noted the post of aggie's, whining about the rules of order imposed by Kiernan. About time rules got enforced EQUALLY over there.76.195.93.15 +" ew what is that ""<3"" seriously thats so queer." +"*Welcome on behalf of the Account Creation Team MESSAGE {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""| Hello, Xander121! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes ""~~~~""; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! MESSAGE {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:white;"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top""| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" c +Oh, and WHY am I blocked from editing MY OWN ARTICLE???????????????????????????? +" well then why not add something that says along the lines of ""becasue of the vagueness of the company, it is currently unknown what is ionized about this bracelet, thereby making it impossible to discredit this bracelet"" Can you tell me how they're marketing this? because if they said it's ionizing, then that's clearly impossible because in order for something to be IONIZING, a charge is needed, which automatically means energy input is required, specifically electricity since we haven't found a metal that converts heat directly into electricity, I call bullshit on this and it should say somewhere in the article about it. If they said it was IONIZED then you could make a note on the article that many ordinary objects are ionized, ie anything with electroplating or the mercury in florecent lamps etc.." +"== The Fray == You asked: ""I wondered why you removed these links as ""Spam"" from The Fray page: [...] The First one is The Fray's Official Myspace which people can hear music from. The second is a very imfomative fansite, from which a lot of the original artical information came from (including the information on Movement and Reason) as well as the webmaster (me...which is why I am asking) checks all the information on The Fray articles to make sure they are completly accurate. So I'm wonering why it was labeled Spam...."" Please read WP:EL. Thanks. " +JUST TO BE CLEAR: IF YOU POST ANYTHING ON MY TALK PAGE AGAIN IN THE FUTURE, IT WILL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT ANY FURTHER COMMENT. Please see wiki rules on editing other people's talk pages. +Question How do you add references? +Sorry about any trouble you have experienced. My school's I.P. is blocked due to vandalism, and when i logged in on friday my friend must of seen me entering my password, and has proceeded to vandalise pages. i am sorry. We do, however know someone called Tom Lavers, and he IS related to William Perry. it's just a little outside of the pages topic. i will change my password and do my best to cover my keyboard when entering it. +" Yes it needs something at present its completely un-encyclopaedic but I have no time since I am on a Wiki-break from tonight and this one is pretty demanding time-wise. Sohambanerjee1998 " +Today's youth is being blamed for distracted driving, so I added information about how adults are just as at fault as today's youth is. Parents and caregivers are also participating in distracted driving even when they have their children in the car, putting their lives and their childrens lives at risk. +You smell like doo doo! You stink! +" I notice that both John Von Neumann and Stephen Wolfram get fancy epithets. I doubt we need to inform the reader that Von Neuman is a ""math and computer prodigy"" or that Wolfram is a ""brilliant and controversial scientist"". They probably should be removed. - " +Since no external parties seem interested in commenting on this RFC, what's the next step? +" Here is just one example of what should be qualifying ""citation"" directly stating they were Puppet Governments:http://defendinghistory.com/tag/lithuanian-provisional-government " +" NSA Human Experiments So, Kieth Alexander (NSA) is part of this group... Looks like the beans are being exposed on how this group ""influences"" large populations and politicians: http://deepthought.newsvine.com/intelligence-gathering The NSA has a network of satellites, operating under the guise of Echelon, that use low frequency radio to interface with the human brain. Supported by a supercomputer based strong A.I. with 20-30 years active experience, it is being used to coordinate global operations. Can everyone say RICO??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.84.49 " +tao you saying that I did not take Wikipedia articles in Portuguese and so you guys go on the wiki in Portuguese and translated for you to see if not +"i would but i dont know how Third Estate ? National Assembly ? Re: ''The Tennis Court Oath (serment du jeu de paume) was a pledge signed by 577 members of France's Third Estate on June 20, 1789. .... this was an important factor in the coming of the french revolution the members swore that they wouldn't disband until Louis XVI had granted a constitution for the people of france. aaaaaaaaaah why are you changing it?!!!! Im not sure but i think the oath was written by Abbe Sieyes? Slight Change Changed the wording from leave to disband Saying that they would not leave until they had written a constitution gives the impression that it was written all in one night, This is not true to took along to write a constrictions for France Also and interesting fact; the tennis court is speculated to having been in actuality a handball court adding dates and sources So far so Good but you have no dates and no sources. If there are no objections I will add dates using information from A history of western society sixth edition by Mckay, Hill and Buckler. If someone could please put that in bibliography format. Im missing the first hundred pages in my book. Totally vandalized and requires a rewrite Well obviously this article over the past few days has been totally vandalized and stripped of its information. Somebody tried to rewrite the entire, and what used to be complex and informative article quickly as nobody seems to have a saved copy of the article. In need of some Wiki admins. Hello, Mehicdino! I'm not sure whether you're (talk • contribs), who edited the article to ""remove immature/incorrect text"". However, can either one of you be more specific with what is inaccurate? There was some vandalism in the previous weeks, which I had reverted already (all revisions of the page are stored automatically, and you can access them by clicking on the ""history"" tab above and clicking on the date and time of the revision). Most everything in the article looks correct. Granted, I'm not an expert on this subject, but given that the revision only removed minimal details, which seem correct, and also removed many of the wikilinks, I've gone ahead and reverted back to the previous version for now. Can you clarify on what is incorrect? Thanks! (A note?) Vandalism should never require a rewrite, as it's very easy to revert to a previous version. No, I am not the IP you state I could be because it does not match mine. I was just saying a few days ago somebody actually put much effort into vandalizing this article to a pile of rubbish. Thanks for the reply. I'm just making sure that there is nothing that is obviously inaccurate presently; I hope I took care of all the vandalism with the revert. Thanks! (A note?) This still needs rewriting; what is this?!: ""The Tennis Coart started in the late 1990's and ended in the early 1500's. It resulted in the parilization of the Queen of Scottland. It occured in Witchitah Maine."" Please correct. The vandalism has already been removed; thanks for letting us know. (A note?) Picture I found a better picture at this link: http://www.loyno.edu/~seduffy/tennis_court_oath.jpg —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) . I'm going to refrain from uploading that picture for now. I believe, if my recollection is correct, that the current image is a copy of the actual sketch, and that the colored version was done later by anothe +" Whoops. Sorry for that, I'll be sure to glance at the rest of the article first! complaints? leave me a message! " +Then you won't be able to use a computer. +" Image:John Vanbrugh.png Hi Bishonen, I pushed your image Image:John Vanbrugh.png to Commons:Image:John Vanbrugh.png, and changed links to Image:John Vanbrugh.jpg. I'm wondering how you ""digitized"" the image, exactly. Did you use a scanner? Or a camera? And whatever you used, did it produce PNG directly, or did you do some conversion afterwards? Thanks, | talk 19:46, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)" +in the STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS debate +" Ellen of the Roads, I do not accept that this is a necessary or desirable or reasonable condition. I do not believe I have damaged anything on the project. I have been prevented from defending myself against attacks on me at ANI, which is an extraordinary denial of due process (I was in the middle of a post when you blocked me, having bee out all day). In particular, there is utterly no evidence I have made legal threats: the matter is one of a potential breach of moral obligation. I have no ""legal"" leg to stand on in that respect, so assuming my statement to Manguard was even remotely related to legality is a misunderstanding. Your block was one of the most inappropriate I have ever seen. (talk) " +Your edits to Shockwave (roller coaster) Please stop being a jackass, it really ruins it for all us non-vandal AOL users +" Hi, E91. Thanks for clarifying your vote on the Pro-life talk page, above and beyond the call of duty! Sarek and Ohio are giving you good advice here. (As the leading expert on WP:CIVIL, I should know. ha ha ha!) Never call anyone an ASSHOLE like I did, or liberal scum like you did. You need to learn very quickly how to be more subtle. You are swimming in a sea of editors (and I know you know this) who actually believe that the New York Times, for example, has no bias. So, swim carefully and avoid describing other editors too bluntly. Thanks again. speak! PS to Sarek and Ohio: Don't bite the newbies! speak! " +2nd try Thank you for your welcome. Since you didn't like the photo, here's a substitute +Edits Reworking article at present as several appearances are missing and many statements have no sources. As for Alternate versions, just the gist, without unnecessary detail and sources in text which flips the universe tense. +I'm having trouble deciding names for the butterfly family pages. Hespirids of India, or List of Hesperids of India or Indian Hesperidae Other families will have names in the same vein. Plese comment. +Yes, it is- I see Clayton was responsible for the design of Wainwright's D class 4-4-0 cab and splashers as well! +, 15 February 2009 (UTC) If the point is that Warren and his church are viewed as controversial in some circles and that some substantial, clear (particularly to those unfamiliar with the American cultural stew from which this springs), additional detail should be added to the articles (both here and at Rick Warren) to reflect that, then that should be argued. Otherwise, all this blather over Savage's latest addition to the English language is a waste of time; it's a poor surrogate that avoids mention of such substantive issues. I think it reflects accumulated fatigue from the long arguments over past unsuccessful proposed changes. 06:17 +why you delete $800,000 in improvements started at the 800-foot-long, deep-water dock that is to accommodate cruise ships ....... you don't a like a salem you a stick up for a da stalker onhitsajamie +Tom Atkins (actor) vandal The Tom Atkins vandal is at it again. He has also been putting bizarre statements on my talk page. +Title needs to be changed in order to maintain NPOV The title must be changed from Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting to Sandy Hook Elementary School Killing or Attack. To keep it as a school shooting puts too much emphasis on the fact that firearms were used. +Wow Thanks! You are SO amazing! I am in awe of your skills and everything you have learnt in Scientology! You really are a hero, and I wish all of us could be a bit more like you! Continue this subconscious feeling of superiority to other people and eagarness to show off, it's great. You're abusive to everything that Scientology is about. It's about learning things for your own and adapting them into your own and using it as a tool for yourself, not becoming what you learn and getting further away from yourself, so you come off quite ridiculous without even realizing it. Oh yeah and all the lies about Scientology on wikipedia don't even really matter,if someone is going to get into Scientology, they're not going to be thrownoff by an encyclopedia that is known for being inaccurate because its written by anyone with a computer, and you take it so seriously like it's really going to affect things and this is some warzone we need to fight, it's not going to stop scientology so don't worry about it +" Biography ""His portrayal (or caricature) of Asian characters though, hereand elsewhere, has caused some controversy in recent years."" Where's here? Why?" +DONT BREAK WP:3RR BIATCH +. Ionians were justified by their unknowledge, and Jesus only adjusted Himself to their lower level of knowledge, calling Himself as local Ionian Beginning and End +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!  Talk {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|No persona +Which do you do for if they are speddy deleted before? And thanks. +Fuck off animal shagger. +And I've put it back, with a ref. It took a few seconds to find a source, don't be so hasty to pull information +Early life of Joseph Smith The article Early life of Joseph Smith, Jr./Stable is currently being proposed to be made a Stable version, this nomination is a test of the process detailed on that page. As you have edited that page recently, please review the stable version of the article and join the discussion at Talk:Early_life_of_Joseph_Smith%2C_Jr./Stable. +" doesn't recognise , nor is there any equivalent. " +Surname dab split This page needs to be moved back to Gentile (surname) (it was moved at the end of May 2008) and the dab information spun off back to Gentile (disambiguation). +" Vandals I found some vandals making the surface water definition as ""gay"" and such...but since i'm new the deleting was sort of...weird as you can see in the history. Howver, the new edition no longer has the ""gaY"" definition, but rather the OLD one" +Impumozzhi is a liar and has been exposed at Talk:Rathore. What will it take to make him stop lying? = +" The Outfield Hahaha - compassion is vested considering the er...kind endowment by Kylu emblazoning your page my friend. I will recommend a few songs and two albums; Play Deep and Rockeye being the latter. Both are fairly accomplished works and prove quite fresh even today: Songs wise I can certainly recommend ""Your Love"", ""Say It isn't so"", also ""Winning it all"", ""Closer to me"" with ""Tonight your mine"". Also - welcome to Wikipedia! We do not get many persons from Cuba here and it is always a pleasure to welcome new individuals! " +" [[[No page]]] was reviewed by Tentinator This recently popped up in my notifications. Have you reviewed anything lately, or is this just a random bug? Talk " +I would like to remove the 'rejected' tag and start a discussion about possible refinements to the process - probably after the ArbCom case is finished. The case has brought a lot of attention to this issue and future reviews would likely garner far more participation. +You're totally right. 4:41 am, 29 September 2009 (UTC) +" You are awesome!! I agree with you 100% on your endeavors with wikipedia. The POV of the 9/11 article is completely rigged and it is disgusting how many administrators are hovering over the page and protecting it with the ""official story"". We should join forces. " +I was hoping for more constructive input 21655, as you had been involved in this issue - but if that is your only comment, that is that. Thank you. 72.92.4.157 +you better chill out because I kust explained your question +It has one. Wrestlinglvoer420 +No Unsubstantiated Allegations It's against Wiki policy (and also the arbcom ruling on this article) to post unsubstantiated allegations against a living person. If you're going to accuse someone of criminal wrongdoing based on gossip, without even an arrest or charge, let alone a conviction, that's an awfully dangerous game. +Thank you for the kind thought. While editing as a registered user I was wisely advised by an experienced editor that I needed to work out a survival strategy. For better or worse, mine has been to ip... Cheers, 86.173.146.3 +okay WHAT A BUM BANDIT +why did you delete SopCast you faggot? +Cutler Excellent detective work finding the Cutler obituary. +Now you will know what it's like Dear Geoff, hope you enjoyed our game. What's it like to have your credibility hammered on such an open forum?hee hee. Bet you wish you never started your silly campaign, and to the rest of them hey ho. I see that even Mark has got involved... oh dear!!!! +Hmm. That might possibly work, but I don't know how it will look. I'll do some sandboxing and see how it goes. (Might be a little while ... various other things calling as well!) +Response to your Lieberman/Lamont post Your questions are all over the place so I'll just give you my over-arching opinion about the whole thing... My opinion is that Lieberman will win the general election as an independent. I don't agree with him 90% of the time but I like him because he's a honest politician. (one of the few in America) As for Lamont, I see him as Howard Dean II. Sure, the left-wing loves him but when it gets closer to the election, centrist democrats and independents will vote for someone else. I have no idea what CNN will do though I have a strong feeling that they would LIKE to support Lamont. Personally, I can't stand anti-war candidates in this era because most of them don't want to use the military AT ALL. That being said, I'm not blindly pro-war, either. I want to use force when it's neccessary. I supported the reasons for the war in Iraq (and still do) but I'm totally pissed off about how Bush has waged the war. It's as if Bush wants to lose or pass the problem to the next president. (Talk) +A page you started has been reviewed! Thanks for creating Supreme Divinity (Tai Di), Dcattell! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: Great article on Supreme Divinity (Tai Di). Thanks for contributing! To reply, leave a comment on RDN1F's talk page. Learn more about page curation. +Vandalism report Re: User:2001:e68:4429:3d3a:d5f7:69a3:bdb2:7f4f I guess I should have made more note of the fact that the IP hopping vandal is the latest in a very long line of extraordinarily similar vandalism across a range of articles. +If it redirects here, we must address it on this page. Otherwise we should either have an article for it, or the redirect should be deleted. If the redirect page wasn't protected I'd nominate it for deletion. - +Added quotation marks. many of the other .edu links I have checked provide a similar definition +didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt +" Vote on the new Main Page Voting for the new Main Page has begun! There are several candidates to choose from. Voting ends January 28th. To see the candidates, CLICK HERE" +" ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section." +omg Omg u think your so smart omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111 +FUCK YOU CHILD MOLESTER +What does Alpha have to do with The Rascals?? +" You missed the ""In general"" and ""causal vandals"" parts out of your consideration. i.e. it isn't always the case, and since you appear at the same time as a large number of other users to vandalise that page I wouldn't classify your vandalism as casual. (talk) " +" Yes. Maybe each user should nominate another user to become their lawyer for a short period of time. 110 " +" If anyone at any point wishes to make a go at creating a critical reception section, then sources are hidden under the Principal roles and cast members section.. I added the sources thinking I would have a go at creating this section, however it is not something I am very good at. Scot " +Dave i raised the sock puppet case because my edits are constantly being needled by single article accounts , i would hope that you would assumme that i have made some good faith edits in 2500 plus edits ,but lets make a deal, i have nothing to hide but i will add content that is sourced to the article,also i will ask you can you watch the article to see that people inclueing me are following the rules and not needling other peoples edits and editors are using the talk page +" For the record, below is the controversial text which these morons think needs citations: The Coyote (canis latrans, or ""prairie wolf"") also interbreeds with dogs, and many Americans have dogs which are part coyote. The coyote is very closely related to the wolf, and the two can be made to interbreed, but they never do in the wild. Most dog/coyote hybrids are in the domestic population, where the father is the coyote responding to a female dog in estrus, and the puppies are born into captivity. The word coydog was coined in the Eastern US when coyotes began to appear there, as they seemed larger than western coyotes, and it was assumed that they were dog/coyote hybrids. DNA evidence has shown, however, that this is not the case. The Golden Jackal is another wild wolf-like canid which can interbreed with dogs, and it has been crossed with dogs by Russian breeders to created the Sulimov Dog. Any species of the Canis genus has 78 chromosomes and can interbreed with dogs. These include all varieties of the wolf, the golden jackal, the coyote, the dingo, and the New Guinea Singing Dog. The only 78-chromosome canid which is not thought to have contributed to the dog gene pool is the African wild dog, which is in a separate Genus. However, the vast majority of the DNA in dogs comes from the various Canis lupus varieties. Yellow jackals have 74 chromosomes and don't interbreed well with dogs, and other wild canids such as the bush dog, the maned wolf, and the fox, have different chromosome sets and cannot interbreed with dogs at all, so they played no part in the dog ancestry. See canid hybrid. Finally, the origin of the dog is so ancient that many now-extinct varieties of wolf, some unknown, may have played a part. It is wrong to say that dogs descended from modern wolves. They descended from ancestral wolves, and this difference must always be kept in mind. Ancestral wolves of many varieties existed all over the planet and were most likely domesticated in many places during a period of thousands of years, and some of these ancestors are now extinct. This helps in explaining the different morphological groupings of dog, as each group may have derived from a different variety of wolf. The common belief that greyhounds and other short-haired dogs descended from modern gray wolves of norhtern climates, and lost their undercoat through human breeding, is weak compared to the argument that these breeds descended from a short-haired wolf of warmer climate. The Arabian Wolf, for example, has short hair suited for its climate" +"=== Please stop disambiguating Christ. === Hello! I realize that at the present Christ is a disambiguation page, but your edits are sometimes not making sense. Can you please concentrate on another project? For example, in the Perpetual virginity of Mary entry, you altered a quote that did not say ""Jesus Christ"". In the entry for Trinity you made it say ""Jesus Christ"" when ""Christ"" seems more to the point at that instance. There is a subtle nuance that you are not catching.... Please work on something else. | [msg] 06:42, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC) " +" yo Haha. Thanks, bro. So, what exactly has Hybrid been telling you? Lol. —mikedk9109 " +Mr. Stemonitis, you are a stupid botanist, who does not know the taxonomy of dipterous. For that, you must leave the corrections made in the definition of the superfamille. +Well, I think it's sad that a culture has been created here that's so hostile to people merely wanting to bring balance that they feel forcedinto a 'poster-protection program' but I respect your position. Please stay and continue your great work. I'm not afraid of these POV warriors. Their fear of me however has turned them into paranoics seeing 'Big Daddy' in anything and everything they encounter that's fair at Wikipedia. In the meantime, I'm gonna go back in later and clean up any mess that's been left, unless you beat me to it. Take care +Regarding your removal of How to choose guide from Digital signatures... can you please explain why this seemed like a sales pitch? My aim is not make it a sales pitch but a usefull tool to reveal all the considerations people aren't always aware of. Please let me know how I can change it so it doens't sound like a sales pitch. +Take this how you will, but you suck Big Black Donkey Balls +i only made the edit so i could read the fucking article not your stupid copyright notice wtf sort it out i only made the edit so i could read the fucking article not your stupid copyright notice wtf sort it out +Graeme Bartlet MUST die +Would you object to stub articles the second you notice them or would you give them like a month or a week? +It seems to me that you are the one who is indulging in speculation. e.g. Whether there was a scrivener's error is not mentioned because that _is_ speculation. The fact is as I have stated it. What would have happened after the fact is not being entertained. Again. because that would be speculation. It seems to me that you want to eliminate pertinent facts. I have not reasserted the sentence because it seems quite childish to do so. But be assured that I have every intent to do so unless you can bring forth some substantive rationale for omitting it. +Not to worry I didn't even notice.  (talk • contribs • email) +" Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Canada Masters :Category:Canada Masters, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. WrestleMania XXVII Undertaker 19–0 " +" Click here for a brief explanation from the RefDesk. " +I have died a Dogs death so shame on me pikachu4170 +Truce My words were not meant to be annoying. There is an error in his user page. You shouldn't just jump to conclusions because you have some sort of bizarre internet power. Read below and please ensure you understand it prior to commenting further. In working on Wikipedia, you may occasionally get into a dispute with another person. That person may seem like a troll or a hothead to you, but it's usually best to assume that you are dealing with a reasonable person who is simply confused on a particular issue or has a POV different from your own. No matter what the problem is, flaming is not going to solve it. Try to reach a truce. +"On one, ""Warner Bros."" is clipped at the top, on the other it isn't. " +P.S thanks Pumpmeup for the advice but it unfortuantley didn't work it;s good to meet another Aussie over the internet. +" Some notes Hi Amoruso, in regards to your edits on Palestinian refugee and Palestinian exodus, I want to ask you for a favor. While I don't agree that Katz is as neutral a source as you claim, I'm usually not one to advocate censorship on Wikipedia. However, you could do us a huge favor by trying to make your point (i.e. showing your sourced POV that you want to convey) without endless quotes from one rather biased source. The problem I have is that you are bombarding these articles with an endless tirade of anti-Palestinian quotes that, intentionally or not, turn the article into a hate blog. Again, while I admit I don't agree with your analysis as I think its a distortion of history and a sort of dehumanization, I am NOT asking you to remove it. What I am asking is that you make your point concisely, neutrally, (i.e. provide the point of view in a neutral way, if that makes sense), and in an encyclopedic manner. Endless quotes and tirades like that are not encyclopedic material. There are much better, proper, and neutral ways to make your point. Thanks (talk) p.s. I noticed a new article Western Wall Tunnel in which you used a Haaretz article by Akiva Eldar as proof that Arafat 'incited' riots. That article says nothing of the sort, and barely mentions the tunnel incident just in passing as 'evidence' that Arafat was trying to get out of a dead end. It would be helpful to make that small section both accurate and NPOV. Thanks. (talk) " +Awwwwwwwww. Did I hurt your feelings? +Thanks for the reference. I missed it - undoubtedly because of the space in the name. I am now trying to get a translation. Let me know if you see one somewhere. Why Cinnabar? Strange. - +Agreed with below. This page serves to reveal the methods behind many classic gaffed effects in card magic. It would be better to removing the parts that contain method and simply stick to what effect the deck ACCOMPLISHES. Magicians in the online community have become used to exposures on YouTube and other sites, but an easily searchable database of text explanations greatly reduces the barrier for an interested party to find the method. Wikipedia should not just aggregate all the methods in magic, as fewer people would benefit from the knowledge (beginners, etc) than would suffer (professional magicians, kids, etc). +Disgusting, hideously ugly fat pig, ScJessey, should not be allowed to edit left-wing articles This pig is nothing but a gate-keeper for liberal hagiographies. When is he going to be banned forever? +Deleting the majority of the article Original research, speculation, POV, crystal-balling, and more original research. The article contains just about everything that shouldn't be in an article, and nothing that should be in. No notability, no references, no relevancy, and no prose. I've removed the majority of the article, and call for the rewrite of the pitiful little that remains to make at least some sense and notability, or I will nominate it for deletion. |heru|nar +" Hey there, I'll be glad to clarify what I mean. There are a few problems I have with the site, and not in and of itself (actually, it looks pretty good and says the same things I would say). First, it appears to be a fan-site, which is not considered reliable enough for use as a source in Wikipedia. This also includes for external links, as the usual case for someone posting such a site here is to promote and drive traffic to it. Second, this type of information belongs in a travel guide, which is something Wikipedia is not. I would actually suggest this site for something like Wikitravel. Again, it's not a bad site, but it's inappropriate here. I would have no problem mentioning this site on the article's talk page, and if consensus wants it in there, then so be it. I do apologize for using the template, as I do know the general guideline is don't use template warnings for regular contributors. That said, I do hope this makes my reasoning a bit clearer. Please feel free to message me again if you have any questions or additional concerns. Thank you for your contributions, and Happy New Year! AU93 " +"=Proposal that a new ""People who have been accused of anti-Semitism"" category be created=== As I've already written above, I oppose placing Gibson's bio in the 'Anti-Semitic People' category because he vigorously denies the charge and listing him as such, without qualification, is tantamount to calling him a liar. Anti-Semitism is a very serious and potentially libelous charge, and Wikipedia should categorically label a person as anti-Semitic only in cases where the person either admits to being anti-Semitic or admits to holding unquestionably anti-Semitic views. Gibson has done neither and in fact vigorously denies both charges. I do, however, sympathize with people who continue to add the 'anti-Semitic People' tag to his page. I therefore propose the creation of a new category called 'People accused of anti-Semitism'. The category would be for people who face (or have faced) substantiated charges of anti-Semitism from respected sources. ""Substantiated charges"" would obviously mean that there was reliable evidence to support the charge (as opposed to a ""my best friend's roommate told me"" accusation), and ""respected sources"" would refer primarily to credible individuals and organizations that have an accomplished track record of identifying and combating anti-Semitism (civil rights organizations like ADL and SPLC come to mind). This new category would allow Wikipedia to associate the anti-Semitism controversy with Gibson's article without actually leveling the charge that he is anti-Semitic. Thoughts? ==" +The Graphic Novel (set in 1997) mentions Queen Zara celebrating her 16th birthday (thus Zara Philips). +What is the point of the proposed edit? What meaning does it have? If the meaning is a significant change from previous views, then it needs strong support from secondary sources. The only comment given to justify the revert seems very adequate. +, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Ah, didn't realise it was as long as three months. I should have looked back on what happened with Chetwynd, British Columbia, where I was slightly controversial by listing it on FARC (as it was then) seven weeks after it was promoted. Well, let's just say that when I said 'a few', I meant 'about twelve'... 18:58 +" ""Only to the audience"" and planning of Angier's shooting Can someone please tell me how he recounts his method ""only to the audience""? It seems to me that he's explaining his method directly to Borden as he was dying. He tells Borden to ""look where you are"" and ""it takes courage to walk in every night not knowing whether I was going to be the prestige or the man in the box"" (paraphrasing). Obviously, he doesn't play a video to Borden showing him exactly what we, the audience see, but it was pretty clear to me that these clips were meant to be explanatory not only to the audience, but in a sense to Borden as well. The phrasing (included below) makes it sound like Borden never finds out how Angier did the trick. ""Similarly, flashbacks recount (only to the audience) Angier's method: that each time he disappeared during his illusion, he fell into a locked tank and drowned, and the machine created a duplicate who teleported to the balcony and basked in the applause."" Also, having just watched the film again, it seems to me that Cutter colludes with Borden to allow Borden in to kill Angier so that Angier can re-unite with his daughter (who he earlier recommends that she ""needs her father."") Cutter leaves ""Lord Caldlow's"" estate disgusted, as he has stolen Borden's daughter and helped frame him for murder. I assume that he resolved to help Fallon/Borden to get his daughter back after finding out that Lord Caldlow was really Angier. Thoughts? The ending of the film Angier is still alvie. This is the reason for Caines V.O. asking the audience to ""see it"" Now if you pause the DVD you will actually see an air bubble rise int he water. How am I the only one who see this? I will keep changing this page till people understand this. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.42.208.182 Please review the archive links at the top of this page. We discussed this when the film was originally released. — | Talk So what are you suggesting? An Angier hid in a water tank, held perfectly still and held his breath for a at least 5 good minutes... For what? If there is an air bubble it's probably because Jackman needed to breathe... The air bubble is real; I saw it twice in the theater and on DVD. I can upload a screen shot from the DVD with the air bubble if necessary. The point is, other editors have argued that this doesn't mean anything, however what bothers me is this: the Nolan's are really good at what they do. If we saw the air bubble, then you can bet they saw it, and if it was a mistake, it would have been digitally removed. The fact that they left it in the film is very interesting, and nicely parallels the end of the novel itself. On the other hand, it doesn't make sense. The Angier floating in the tank is clearly dead and has no way of getting out. — | Talk Plot Ending In the plot description of this page it states that the film ends with Borden eyeing the water traps containing the dead duplicates of Angier. However, when I saw the film (and I may be mistaken in this) it seemed as if the trap shown immediately before the credits contained a living Angier. This fact was further emphasized when the camera panned away from the burning theatre and to the body of Angier, which had wide open eyes and appeared to be viewing the scene that had just occurred between Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale, and the credits roled immediately after he came into full view (only showing the body for a second). It may also be that the director included this to leave the audience guessing as to whether or not the body was alive or not and whether Angier did in fact have the last laugh. Either way, a reference to this should be included into the Plot Summary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Keep in mind that like most Nolan films, the film is non-linear, so the plot summary synthesizes in many areas, including the conclusion. This format isn't de rigueur, and improvements are always welcome as long as the plot is short and sweet per WP:MOSFILM. As for whether Angier has his eyes open or is alive, that is pure speculatio +You are a stalker...it is as plain as the nose on your face....you have an extremist POV and your contributions are by revert and not addition...all told, you're quite useless...according to you Irgun is not a terrorist organisation????????????????????????????????....you belong in the Osama bin Laden category of extremists......PS Banias was never on the Israeli side of the green line..so it was never to be given or left to Syria, it was not part of the deal ever, hence the channel could be dug in Syrian territory without going through Israel. The international border (still internationally recognised) still runs a couple of kms away between Tel Dan and Banias. That's called Geography......... Category:Osama bin Laden +" Drop the tone ArcAngel, what I do is for the good of wikipedia. The IP's are here and there and running across the banisters and it's been going on for too long. The page protection has been requested, and there isn't really anything to add.  jan→  " +Possibly unfree files Some of the files that you have uploaded may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 February 26#OTRS pending since November. ~~~~ +Need Your Help With Publishing My Article in Google I'm the author of the article, 'Falcon and Magluta'. I found your name on my article, so I assume youre helping me with it. I already finished the article. But I cant find it in google when I try to google it. How can I get it in google? Appreciate your feedback. +" Epidemiology There are two sets of figures, one for the population of people with mental illness (numbers ranging from 0.017% through to 10%) - there is then a set of 3 figures for the general population ranging from 0.4%-1.1% under the heading that ""within the general population the variation is less"". This statement is patently false - the fact that only 0.17% of the mentally ill population in one country have the disorder means that the variation between that and the 1% figure would be huge - statement should be removed. Also - why does this second table exist, there are only 3 figures in it - is it relevant or important? 130.216.91.176 " +Well at least the relevant passage(s). I think most German to English machine translations are ok, but one of the passages confused the machine translations because of an idiomatic phrase, and the other one was a problem because of complex sentence structure interacting with sarcasm. The machine translations mostly supported the wrong interpretations that people wanted to include, but the a human fluent translation does not. I don't want to go through that again. +Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia This article can't be renominated for deletion so there is a discussion in the TP. I'd appreciate your input. +" ""I want to be a fuck you."" That's a song. Open Proxy! Yes!" +Bryan You may want to move the block extension request from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/BryanFromPalatine to ANI, probably a better chance of it getting seen/discussed there. I know how annoying it is to deal with sockpuppeteers, I went through the same thing on with Jacob Peters (a notorious pro-Stalinist sockmaster). - +"== Thahrani == This section moved to here from Talk:The London Eye Mystery by 82.132.220.222 Thahrani is a surname of Kudhechha, a subcaste of Menghwar. About 25 families who belongs to this surname, lives in Thahrani colony, at the north side of village Verhar near Diplo Sindh Pakistan. People belongs to this surname mostly are government employee and educated. Some of these are teachers, some are clerks and some are politicians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) " +" I recommend to anybody wanting to know something about Republican Sinn Féin history, to look at the previous versions of this page before the thought police deleted the article ""A Short History of Republican Sinn Féin."" Try to have a look at the article quoting from Éamon McCann, it really shows what good writing should be, not like what we have to endure on the main article here. Its funny how Damac and Demiurge have left a cut and paste from Brian Feeney's book ""Sinn Féin 100 Turbulent Years."" No Worries about copy right here. guess it has nothing to do with the fact that the case they are trying to present, that Adams didnt expel himself in 1986, is entirely dependant on this quote from his book. That it is a weak case is obvious - thats why they have deleted all my efforts to set the record straight and have now threatened to ban me from Wikipedia. " +" First Lady Title Last time I checked being a first lady is not a formal position and I am not sure why Wikipedia is misinforming people by posting this under the persons picture like it is a formal position. There is also ""In office"" underneath the title. This is unprofessional and misinformation and should be removed from underneath the picture of the person." +Hello to you. This is 195.93.21.34, one of the family here anyway. Not having contributed i thought i'd throw in my 2 cents. No one here has edited anything, and i wish to make it clear that i find many of these accusations reactionary and offensive. If any one has a problem with anything we are supposed to have written, please do us the courtesy of providing a link to the page you are talking about, so we at least can see what your accusing us of. This is the last time i will say, on behalf of this family IP, that we have not contributed to anything. Any further unfounded accusations of vandalism, and any further aggressive comments containing no information at all, i will report to a member of the wikipedia team. I hope that if there are problems in the future, for example if someone else is using this IP externally, i would appreciate it if we could talk about it coherently, and once again request the courtesy of being informed of our Kafka-esque crimes. Thank you. +Shouldn't this article be abolished? It goes against wikipedia's rules about notable persons The article says nothing about what he's done in his life. He seems to have had a grandfather who was notable, but wikipedia doesn't normally have articles about non-entities just because they're related to famous people. +Shark Boy and Norman Smiley Why is it that you Sevenzeroone says: Poopy is not fun! insist on continually removing them from the TNA roster page, they have teamed many times, they are set to team several more times in the near future, and they are an official tag team! +RANGE BLOCKING WHEATON AND HALF of DUPage is Real nice Gamaliel as well as if the IRS pick up wiki's violations in code. Gamaliel you damage wikipedia every time you push your political agenda. +I'm not interested in playing semantic games with you, Lancaster. You've just completely removed an entire sourced paragraph with direct quotes in it from the source, and replaced it instead with a bogus failed verification tag. There's absolutely no justification for that! +" A further quote from Manuals of Style, this time from the section which directly addresses the issue of mixed or non-capitalised. ""For trademarks that are given in mixed or non-capitalization by their owners (such as adidas), follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules. ... The mixed or non-capitalized formatting should be mentioned in the article lead, or illustrated with a graphical logo."" Standard English text formatting and capitalisation rules would render GReeeeN as Greeeen, plain and simple. It's not even possible to use CamelCase as a defence, as it's capitalisation for capitalisations' sake within a single word. I'm not quite sure how much clearer I can make this. " +You're a motherfucking homo try getting a life. You delete perfectly good articles for no good reason then insult the maker of the account. It's your own fault everyone's been attacking you, you good-for-nothing fuck. And fuck this filter that tried to stop me, it can't protect you from the truth. This is going to keep happening, from me, from the people you fucked over, from their friends. And stop salting your hair you freak, you look like a goddamned hobo! +semi-protecting I'm semi-protecting the article for a while to try to quiet this persistent and tedious vandalism. +Delete the page and shut up +And you've proved you have zero semblance of a life, yet again. +According to alitalia, they fly to CPH also from venice. +Then this will never be a neutral article, because you are pretending your POV has an absolute stranglehold monopoly on all permissible discourse, and that's frankly bullshit. /talk/ +" {| width=""95%"" style=""background:transparent"" Greetings Paultthomas, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking (or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You might want to start with the Wikipedia Tutorial, it has loads of very helpful information, and links to more in-depth information if you get the ""WikiBug"" like many of us do. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. I'm including some useful links to help you get started. If you have any questions, feel free to head over to my Talk page and ask! Happy editing! - Ariel♥Gold Helpful Links Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility" +Crazy low-lives like you ruin Wikipedia and Brazil Opinoso. When will you stop changing Wikipedia for your own twisted reasons- you have edit-warred and been blocked by countless people!! Stop!! +Spoilers Will someone PLEASE mark spoilers, or remove the bit about Fry and Lars at the end? People slightly curoius will have the ENTIRE MOVIE RUINED for them if they read that last paragraph. Someone put a spoilers mark as I don't know how. +Thanks for the advise. Point noted. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠ ♠ +Chinese fan dance There doesn't seem to be any articles on the Chinese traditional fan dance. Do you know of any? (talk) 20:54, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) +" You are Stalin apologets. Where is placed the mention of Katyin massacre, where several thousands of polish POVs were shot by NKVD upon Stalin's personal order? We hugarians are very close brothers of the polish people historically, so I find the lack of proper and emphasized mention of Katyin very painful. Stalin's crimes against Poland are amongst the most outrageous in written history. There is no excuse to the Molotov-Rippentropp pact. Make no mistake that was the Hitler-Stalin pact. I really wish Stalin ruled you, not us. You are like Rumsfeld, who met Saddam during mid-1980s and praised him as a good ally in the anti-Khomeini Iran war. When will you realize that Putyin's current rule is an analog of Stalin's, characterized by extreme disregard for law, anti-semitism (most notably the early 50's doctor trials vs. 2004's Khodorkovski-Yukos) and imperialism (brutal military actions in the Caucasian Mountains both times and desire to the rule neighbours). Thus, by not mentioning Stalins criminality in unambigious terms, you hold the english-speaking world blind to Putyin's methods and you contribute to a ""new Uncle Joe"" sentiment, which will inevitable put the world and the poor Russian race in great danger. A repetition of history for those who refuse to learn about the past. Stalin started his reign with a few million dead, by reversing Lenin's post-civil-war ""new economic policy"" of limited private agriculture thus leading to big famine. The entire WWII in Europe would be over in 6-9 months had Stalin failed to entirely decapitate the soviet army's elite in 1937-39, this is clearly written in vol. 2. of soviet published seven-volume ""The history of the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945"". You are plain stupid to praise Stalin for a ""hard earned victory in WWII"". So powerful was the fear of Stalin's evil power, that even us hungarians, who previously fought three revolutions and independence wars in the last 300 years, did not dare to raise again until autumn 1956 to free ourselves from stalinism. Anglo-saxons betrayed us big time then, shame on the Free World. In churches renovated after WWII (big destruction in Hungary) the face of the Satan (as defeated by arch-angel Michael) is always of Josif Stalin's on wall paintings. People were shot for painting that. Regards: Tamas Feher." +" This was a ""tool"" I'm so tired of archaeologists interpreting anything they don't understand as simply ""art."" At the very least call it prehistoric crafts, because they were actually utilized in some way. In the case of this figure, it is a prehistoric fertility ""dildo."" The male deer is coming up behind the female to mount her. It would be used on the female before copulation because of the increased fertility perceived to coincide with female orgasm. Note the ridging. Archaeologists historically are afraid to openly discuss the sexual nature of prehistoric crafts. This is why so many things are labeled ""fertility object"" when they are dildos, plain and simple. Yes, population increases were the larger goal of this. But the female orgasm was proof that some supernatural force had blessed her womb. 97.64.176.4 " +Thanks for the mebrane work Thank you for working on that article. There was a big snarl with different articles duplicating each other and redirecting in strange ways. I kinda cleaned up that in terms of which articles exist, but this one still needs work. Artifical membrane has pretty decent content as does cell membrane at lower levels of the heirarchy. I am thinkming of getting an article on ePTFE written. () +I'm curious as to why someone should feel the need to place such a message on someone's talk page, let alone expect a reply. +" Have any of you seen a child blown up in front of you? Have you ever run across a minefield to save your dying friends? How are your ""edit wars"" anything like that? And SSTflyer, I admit that I'm a douche, and I'm working on that. How about I work on not being so smug, and you work on not being so judgmental? No more talking with me. Back to Solitary. Mabuhay! - LoRETta/ " +May 2007 (UTC) I'm afraid that you've jumped in without looking there, although I didn't acknowledge it on this page, I did keep off 's User page. (talk) 13:04, 30 +" Possibly Twins? You are WillowW and I am PillowP. Perhaps we are separated twins! We seem to have so many things in common. I, too, sit around and drool at the computer for hours, furiously editing useless articles about math. And hey, I also have a mediocre knowledge of latin poetry! Maybe we can get together and feel better than other people because we patrol Wikipedia. Gee, but I look up to you. I wish I had a picture of a statue of a little girl holding a dead bird. (. I'm pouting! The Special Editor because you have been extraordinarily slow with the people who have left comments at your Retardation Featured list, taking the time to drool on every single reviewer. I'm a person just like you But I've got better things to do Than sit around and fuck my head Hang out with the living dead Snort white shit up my nose Pass out at the shows I don't even think about speed That's something I just don't need I've got the straight edge p.s. WillowW is a STUPID name. period blood." +And who is the person who determines if something is 'relevant'? YOU? I don't think so. The information must be reached by consensus. And if you make edits claiming grammar or style reverts than you better well post EXACTLY what you mean by it. +" Congrats and keep up the good work ) — (Ping me) " +Ganguly family (films): Copyvio Gallery Boss, these pix were already uploaded on WP. What made them copyvio? Please, advise. - - please, answer to my talk page. +Memento Mori What's your source that tells how long Beautiful Bride is? +" Speedy deletion of ""ABHi Technologies"" A page you created, ABHi Technologies, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thanks.   | talk  " +" Donaldduckfan101 I have filed an SPI case against him in connection to Bambifan101. ╟─►the name is a lie.─╢ " +" You twit, take two You say: ""Be civil. If you don't agree with an action I made, please be calm and polite. We'll straighten things out a lot quicker without screaming and name calling."" and then go and post a ""Final Warning"" with respect to ""vandalism"" (see above) which is no such thing. Get a life. 66.185.192.207 " +Schatche is not a SBVT member 07:34, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC) +I agree.BeasttoBeast BeasttoBeastBeasttoBeast +Windows userbox Your modifications to the Windows 95 userbox messed up the template and thus every page that it was in, so I reverted them. +I think that we all have our point of view, as far as any given subject is concerned; the point is that we should try not to show it when we write an article. But it impossible, in my opinion, to require that only people with absolutely no POV whatsoever can edit an article: such people are merely not interested in the subject (for instance, I have no POV at all as far as Jayant Kaikini is concerned, but that's probably due to the fact that, before I pressed the random article button, I was totally unaware of his existence...)... +What a ridiculous suggestion. If you don't think certain flags are British then why would it be relevant for the United Kingdom? +" You know... [Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frasier's Curse you're fucking crazier] than I thought. Try ADDING SOME CONTENT, not judging others. What a frigging piker. GROW THE FUCK UP. // nkB " +" Secular Humanist Let me be the first to congratulate you on your RfA. If we religious folk ever get into a pious snit, I will call upon you as an ""unbiased Secular Humanist"" to referee. Thanks for making yourself available to be an Admin. Cheers - " +" First Comment There you go! Archived! Click on the archive box link to go to your old talk page. Come school time, I'm going to teach you how to do it yourself. 91093 - Contributions - " +You can't cite a single cherrypicked dubious opinion from a contributor to another article (even challenged within its own recent edit history) to claim a consensus to make a contentious change this article a month after the discussion was settled here, and revert on that pretext. It's an abuse of procedure. 61.68.175.113 +Then it's hardly encyclopedia material either. +To know more about Goa contact: gaunkars@gmail.com +Good god the power you have must be ORGASMIC!!! +" Clarification for you (and Zundark's right, i should have checked the Wikipedia bugs page first). This is a ""bug"" in the code that makes wikipedia work it just means that there is a line of code that may have an error as small as an extra space. It's analogous (in a VERY simplified way) to trying to make something bold in HTML and forgetting to put the at the end, so you'd see something like this: words in bold Instead of this: words in bold It's not like a virus, that is code somebody deliberately wrote in order to infect your computer and damage files, so it won't ""go around."" JHK " +While I did say there is no deadline, I was wondering if you intend to finish this review. It's fine if you would like to pass it on to someone else, I would just prefer that it doesn't stay in on hold limbo indefinitely. Thanks for your efforts so far. Talk to me! +"Excuse my poor conduct== But seriously, who checks ""Phnom Nam Lyr Wildlife Sanctuary""/Why? ==" +" There was nothing in particular. I was just hoping to be taught the basics, and then the 'not-so-basics'. Is adoption an ongoing thing? Also, is the goal to become a ""proper"" or ""experienced"" editor?" +Would you prefer I track down his Buffalo Bill's real identity and have him arrested under New York's aggravated harrassment law? +" and let me add.... I'm getting sick and tired of you ""scientifically ignorant and emotionally weak"" people pretending you give a damn about accuracy in wikipedia. Buildings don't collapse at free fall speed from anything other than a controlled demolition! DUH! You wiki people have been causing nothing but trouble for months and years, and have been preventing the TRUTH from coming out from day one! Why don't you, MONGO, tom harrison, morton, and those other idiots go work for the whitehouse. How DARE you issue a warning to me? I am issuing warning to YOU - BACK OFF! If you care about FREEDOM, or whatever we have left of it, then BACK OFF ALREADY! " +" Copyright problems with Image:Central line train interior.JPG An image that you uploaded, Image:Central line train interior.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yet another image stolen and passed off as your own You have stolen Image:Central line train interior.JPG from my Squarewheels.org.uk website, re-saved it at lower quality, and then had the cheek to submit it stating that it was your own picture. It isn't. I took it. It is clearly copyrighted and not in the public domain. You have a long history of doing this. Please stop. Richard Griffin. Liar on the Wikipediaholic test. I can't beleive you are stil lying across the internet. Like your claims to own a TV Production company, a web design firm and own the Thorpe Park group, in addition to claiming to have done the Tube Challenge in 17 hours as well as pretending you own Wikipedia & Coca-Cola, is making this stuff up how you get your kicks? If you were at least going to pretend you'd scored well on your test, you should at least have come up with a plausible score, not one that's 5 times higher than anyone else. I know you'll end up blanking this comment to pretend I haven't made it, but people should know you for the fraud you are. Hmmmm.... Above you say Please leave me a message. Are you trying to get other users to click there to leave you a message? And how are you one of the top twenty on the Wikipediholoc Test? I just checked it and your name is not even on there. Do not remove anything from your talk page. Instead archive it. Image Copyright Violation Copyright problems with Image:Enviro 400 65.JPG An image that you uploaded, Image:Enviro 400 65.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Your edit to Metrobus (Go-Ahead Group) Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Removing Messages Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. links underlined. If you are using Firefox or the full Mozilla browser, press CTRL R. This will refresh the page without looking at the cache. It fixes the problem. I hope that helps. Article proposed for speedy deletion M27 (E) Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at M27 (E). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. " +I’m not saying you have to include everything but the quote from the guardian was more so positive than neutral. And no you don’t have to include the FULL quote but if you are going to talk about THAT particular quote, then you should at least get enough what it was saying. Cause they didn’t say “She wasn’t duly stretched” they said “one can say she wasn’t duly stretched” they also added this part to it. “Knightley brings to the role fine, sculpted features, palpable intelligence and a nice mix of faux-innocence and flirtiness. Even if she doesn't always know what to do with her hands, she gives a perfectly creditable performance” If you want to go for neutrality then you should’ve added that part as well. I mean it’s still a neutral opinion and it still reflects the whole “Generally positive” part. Also in talks of CONTRASTING that bit, you should add MORE to the Quote Quinten Letts made in the Daily Mail. Which stated that she had the Charisma of a gold fish. So you have the positive WITH the negative. This doesn’t take away from the neutrality. If anything it shows just how neutral the opinions were. 74.105.159.145 +" Triple Crown and Grand Slam Champions I am not and was never looking to start trouble, all I am trying to do is expand a definition based on fact and references. The Triple Crown and the Grand Slam are what we have been going back and forth on. My contention is that The Intercontinental and United States Championships are equal and thus are interchangeable when when deciding a Crown/Slam. You say no because WWE never explicitly came out and said so. On 8-4-06, JBL said he was a Slam winner. A WWE wrestler on WWE TV said he accomplished a WWE sanctioned feat. It was said that no outside source has verified this, but no one in WWE has disputed JBL's claim either. Also it must be pointed out that PWI has always considered the two championships as equal. When PWI used to do their rankings for WWF and WCW, the I-C and U.S. Titles were always listed as automatic number one contenders for their respective World Champions. The same holds true today when they do the rankings for Raw (I-C) and Smackdown (U.S.). PWI is considered the main source for what is considered a ""World Title"" and their word is law here on Wikipedia. They also have always maintained that the I-C and U.S. Championships are of equal value and of equal standing. As I have said before, I am not trying to vandalize or add nonsense to Wikipedia, only enhance it with an updated definition based on consensus and fact, based on logic and references. JBL, PWI, and many other wiki users have backed up this definition. (Look at the Triple Crown Champion Discussion page). All I ask is my contribution be allowed to stand as I respectfully feel that I am in the right on this one. Thank you for your time. Vlh." +Addendum: I've emailed my concerns regarding the edits by Elainiea Constantine to the oversight team. 88.104.31.21 +Unfortunately, there seems to be a couple of users are still confused, which means a bunch hidden comment reminders... +I'm asking you one last time to quit vandalising the article until the consensus is met. +Tell me how you can just say that this is the result of a discussion, when there was no such discussion in the first place. (talk | ) +" The uprising began in Benghazi after a "" a small human rights protest, over the massacre of political prisoners from Benghazi 15 years before "" (BBC Panorama, Fighting Gaddafi, reporter, Paul Kenyon) . It escalated when the authorities launched a violent crackdown, firing at unarmed protesters. The use of terror that Gaddafi's men used inspired revlot - this is a theme of his rule I believe , -see todays report on Channel 4 also on fate of Zawiya , a 'ghost town' after Gaddafis brutal suppression of the uprising there . " +Re: Giovanni Pauli images &c.; Yeah, I tried to get that deleted a while back, but it was shot down (unfortunately). I think it's extremely unprofessional, both on the part of wikipedia and the artist, to have the spam listed in articles, but whatever. As for the specs template, yeah - I've kind of given up trying to herd the cats that keep adding fields. I suppose it doesn't really matter, in the long run, when you consider that parametrized templates are no longer a hot-button issue, but it's certainly getting a bit disorganized. I've actually stopped following WP:AIR (and removed myself from the list), stopping by there only occasionally to bitch about things like assessments and the like. Anyway, hope you had a good Christmas. ✈ +The ideas should be reported. But I agree, the sources were rubbish +I completely agree, I soon as I have the time (on July) I'll write a new section on his titles. +" Not really related to the content of the article, but I must say the world ""pulchritude"" is used more on Wikipedia than anywhere else I've seen. I think I've seen it in three articles now. 06:07 22 Jul 2003 (UTC)" +Well then ur a stupid admin then, you should be blocked mate. Now u are waste! +" Other games Hi PR. Sorry your article was deleted. Argument-by-exception doesn't tend to work here: previous creation or deletion of articles has no bearing on the creation or deletion of other articles. However, if you have a specific reason to object to another article's existance (other than ""my article was deleted so this one should be deleted too"") then you need to tag it with {{subst:afd}}. That produces a tag that gives you access to the AfD process. Follow the red link it creates and on that new page add {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | text=Reason}}~~~~ where PageName is the name of the article (case sensitive) and Reason is your detailed reasoning why the article should be deleted. Finally, go to WP:AfD. There's a link marked ""Add a new entry"". Click that link and, at the bottom of the page, add {{subst:afd3 | pg=PageName}} where PageName is is the name of the article (case sensitive). The community will then judge the article on its merits. I hope this helps. ➨ " +" Miscellaneous Today I added Charles Winans Chipp to this disambiguation page in a ""miscellaneous"" category. Although he has a famous middle name, I'm not sure how he's related to any of the Winans. If somebody has information on the Winans-Chipp connection, please leave a note here. " +Language According to what I know, the Torah's language lead people to believe it was written during the era of the Second Temple... +31 hours ago I dont want your whole life story +If you expect everyone here to agree with you then you are terribly wrong. +Parishan, the claim indeed is true and you are actually not saying the truth, the evidence above gives examples of dozens of articles, not one. And your claim of double standards was being brought which you failed to address convincingly. The Azeri term is the Turkic term; Jerusalem’s foreign names are there for a reason. All Persian, Urdu and Hindi qualify as such because they are relevant and present in several historic documents, maps and manuscripts influencing other languages words for the place. There is no proper Azeri distinct term for the place, it is the official Islamic term and the variants are either Turkish or Persian. We can write Jerusalem in Zulu language too, it doesn’t mean it has any historic or notable value. The evidence above documents that the edit happened in a period when you have found various articles where Armenian terms were present and added Azeri terms when it was not relevant. It was explained to you that the Armenian term for Jerusalem was present because there is an Armenian Quarter in Old Jerusalem and there are manuscripts dating back to a millennium and a half. As for the notability, if you’d have taken the time to read others concerns, you will actually remember one example, in which it was asked to you to provide another source while you were stuck to one article in Azerbaijani admitting to have nothing else. You’ve been contributing here for a very significant period of time and should have by now known what qualifies as notable. According to your standards, any college teacher would qualify. We have enough problems here to have to go through your articles’ creation and bring the notability issue. Also, Parishan, don’t you think that your consistent justifications questioning that it was retaliation are a little bit old? Are you trying to insult our intelligence? You’ve retaliated on various circumstances on various cases and this was brought to you on many occasions. Do you feel the need to have your memory refreshed? You deleted Andranikpasha and expended the other article, much like you have added the entry of Armenia in the anti-Semitism article in the past as retaliation, or worked on a NAZI person as retaliation to Vartan’s point which you misinterpreted. Or when you retaliated to one article where an Armenian term was added by adding Azeri term in a dozen articles. This was all I had to say about the issue and if you won’t come clean and admit any wrongdoings then you are in no position to talk about any other contributor’s misbehaving. - +"Removed the baseless claim ""31 % of animals are endangered because of poaching."" There was no citation and there exists no logical reason to believe this. Rachel S " +It would be a very good idea for you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. ∇∆∇∆ +" I think we have reached an agreement that we should change the name. We have four that supported full on and 1 half supporter but his problems with it have been answered and it wont be a problem. " +":@ you have not answered my question ""what did Franklin mean by ""Patriot"" in 1773?"" did he mean a supporter of the Good Old Cause, or did he mean something else? Instead you write ""I think the misunderstanding is that PBS assumes that the word patriot has only positive connotations."" Whether at the time people use the term patriot to mean a supported of the Good Old Cause or something else, its usage today implies someone who supports their nation, and if it is to be used before the UDI, then what does it mean as (the nation did not exist)? @ your argument ""The British colonists had made North America their country"" is I think flawed unless you think that Virginians somehow changed from being patriots to rebels between the 1770s and the 1860s. Surly in both cases they were either rebels or patriots, unless one is using the terms inconsistently. If they were rebels in the 1860 then why not use the term for the 1770s as well? Luckily one can usually substitute the word ""Confederate"" for ""rebel"" so this is not usually a POV issue for civil war articles (but using the word patriot in an article has POV connotations). For example in the main body of the text the first use of the term Patriot is in the sentence ""The landing of this tea was resisted in all the colonies and, when the royal governor of Massachusetts refused to send back the tea ships in Boston, Patriot mobs destroyed the tea chests"". In what way were the mobs patriotic? Even the phrase ""rebellious mobs"" would not be accurate. ""anti-tax mobs"" would be more accurate, but it is probably better just to drop the adjective completely from in front of mobs. " +I don't think he is the best choice. +ah, I wouldn't exactly call him obscure ... he is rather famous in England and Europe. +"""How do you know Cooper shot first? Were you there?"" You where not there so take your own standard and dont comment on it! ""Funny how people believe whatever they want to without any evidence."" Just like you, he shopt a sheriff in the head, thats why he was shot, he has said on his radio show before hand he would shoot it out with police if they came for him! " +" Archives Archive 1 " +I will remain neutral on this one. (Talk) +, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Declining to respond is one thing - completely ignoring someone is a much ruder way to behave. Administrators whose actions are questioned should have the integrity to respond. If he thinks he's completely in the right he only has to say so. Why did he not engage in the discussion on WP:AN immediately after the block? That was simply contemptuous to his fellow administrators. 17:26 +" One More Love Booklet, does anyone have it? please? • You Da One " +" Barn The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar For all your hark work on reverting vandalism and reverting vandalism on my pages. Great stuff! " +Deleted. Untruthfull. Sniff the white phosphorus happy. - 20: +NPOV The God section needs to be rewritten so that it's historical and depicting an Islamic promotion of its viewpoint on a so called-god. +":A date is given at the very beginning; 1910 . It's ""Disney"" isn't a good strong argument. " +Sockpuppeteer!?! An outrageous accusation, yet an amusingly good idea at the same time! 212.23.28.149 +" The improvement is obvious: I've cited the major literature you can discover that it is the scholarly norm in religious studies by checking the various world-class peer reviewed journals I've already cited, along with the major publishers. It is the neutral form and it is error free. The only complaint that has been grubbed up is that it is not the common form. Hence for those who would have difficulties, the BCE usage was linked to the Common Era page. Three reasons for the improvement. The only drawback dealt with. IAR obviously cancels the failing alternative. control " +" Sandpiper is right and Habj, too. There is definitely an error in the text concerned. It should read ""Knut Tordsson (Bonde)"" if using the names in Swedish. Neither Carl, son of Canute, nor his father Canute, son of Tord (no English version of that one is known to me), ever used the Bonde surname. It became a surname, and that of one of Sweden's longest living ""noble"" families (still going strong) around the end of the 16th century. Only the nobility started using surnames then. NO ONE (excuse me for shouting) had any surnames until then in Sweden, though some regular soldiers had nicknames to distinguish them from all the other Anders Anderssons. 80% of the population had no surnames at all, other than new patromymics inherited every generation, until they began adopting them in the 1880's. Women had no legal names at all until 1901. Oh, by the way, ""scholarly convention"" in this case means an attempted bluff for the sake of argument, but nothing factual whatsoever." +Oh, by the way: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/ +feedback for the Simmons folks It seems you are using the Talk Page to assemble material that will eventually be incorporated into the article, right? Please use this page to monitor who's doing what, and remember to sign any additions to the talk page. Thanks. +(also, this comment was made within minutes of Nick-D 'warning' and I had not seen it after). +" Hello Hi Harebag! Welcome! When I saw the article on the Pigeon Force Police Department, I thought it was a joke. It is real. I also started a new article on Larry Buendorf. He's a secret service agent that wrestled a presidential assassin to the ground. Any suggestions for improvement, let me know. As for your article, I suggest a little background. Mention the city and state name. Fix the link. Good Luck on editing! Additional suggestions for Pigeon Force PD: Who's the chief? Any major history? Big crime solved? Any controversy or major lawsuit against it? When was it established? Was the area patrolled by the county sheriff before then and then the city was established (if so when?). These are just tips. Otherwise, there is a risk that someone will petition for the article's deletion because there is a board for that (thus destroying your hard work). That's the reason that I wrote quite a bit about my new article first rather than just start out with a few sentences and add to it slowly. I do plan to add more to my article, though. Archives1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Please sign your messages so people know who is writing them and can write back to you. You do this by clicking on the 4 squiggly lines about 3 inches below the box where you type. 2. There are people who search for things to delete. Don't ask me why. 3. To add references, type in the reference after your sentence. For example, type ""Boston is the capital of Massachusetts."" then after the period type a < then ref then > then http.so and so then < then / then ref then >. I can't do it here otherwise the computer will make my example into a footnote and you then wouldn't be able to see it. The at the bottom, type { then { then reflist then } then } so that the references will print up as a list. Another way is just to pull up an article, push the ""edit this page"" and see how the computer source is written and copy it for your article. I don't know the answers to your questions. Just wait and see. I wouldn't do 20 articles at once until you get a feel of what's accepted and what's not. I'm the wrong person to ask. Don't worry, people will come around. They did to my article within a day or two. " +Reason There is no information about 6 percent greeks in Albania so you are a chauvinist +Exempt pages Is there a way to make an article exempt from this bot? In active election articles, such as Edmonton municipal election, 2010 and Calgary municipal election, 2010, there are lists of campaign websites made available, so that a detailed description of each candidate doesn't get written, (avoiding promotion violations). Often registered users don't know of a new website unless an IP attempts to add it to the article. I believe that these IPs shouldn't get warning messages, per WP:DONTBITE, as they are following the example that they see. +I observed that for some time the link on the i/o page to SIOP was in red, which meant that there was no SIOP entry. I thought it would be helpful to begin this Wikipedia entry. Please join in, and add to the entry. +" I removed the [Editor's note: this statement reflects the current paradigm's view enforced by the author] because it wasnt clear. Could you explain what you meant by that? Who's the author whose opinion is being over-represented? Soap— " +Thanks a lot every time you post, it kills abd's denials that he's not running meatpuppets even more, you kill his creditability more than I every could - please create more accounts. +"First draft for new lead: ""Veganism is the personal practice of eliminating the use of non-human animal products for any purpose (including food and food processing, clothing, medications, and personal care products) for ethical reasons. [Mangels 8]. The term 'vegan' is also used for those who consume a vegan diet for health reasons [Mangels 9], although this usage is disputed [Jo]. The vegan diet does not use meat, dairy, eggs, or honey. Variations of this diet include fruititarianism and raw veganism."" I didn't fill in all the ref info - Mangels refers to The Dietician's Guide to Vegetarian Diets, Jo refers to The Vegan Sourcebook. Comments? " +Such my cock You're threatening to block me? I can change my IP adress within a manner of seconds. I've been blocked from this site so many times that even if I'll be living till the end of times I won't be able to count them. I remember that at one times I was banned for three months, yet I was revandalising this site and attacking wikipedians before the ban was over. +" You are wrong! I also hadd a friend named Neils who kept telling me every time he saw the Dinner and A Movie that he would bend Annabelle Gerwitch ""Over the table"" for some reason but I myself am more into Lisa Kushell. She is very very beautifull@! " +" Takes me a few months ;) '''' (talk'') " +" A quesiton about material allowed on userpages here you said, ""The userpage, or userspace, is not to be used to house a list of misdeeds of another user, unless it is going to be used in dispute resolution, such as RfC."" An aside, before I ask my question, I tried to provide dispute resolution in that incident, but my involvement was based upon my assumption that Drolz was concerned about being blocked, and wanted to assemble evidence should that occur. Turns out my fears were right, he was blocked, but he wasn't amassing Vir quotes for that reason, so I dropped out of the discussion. I can understand why WP would want to discourage collections of misdeeds, but I can also understand why prohibiting it might equally be a problem. I haven't reached my own conclusions on what the policy should be. Back to my question (after pointing out that I am familiar with WP:OSE)—do you think is compliant with or a violation of the policy statement you made? I'm not about to waste my time proposing it for MfD, but I am interested in whether you can distinguish that page from the page of Drolz, which you felt should be deleted.T " +what the heck retard +2007 (UTC) — | (talk) 19:17, 16 August +I think it's a splendid idea. On the Norwegian Wikipedia (where I'm quite active) the same idea has been used. See for example no:Kingdom Hearts and no:Kingdom Hearts (videospill). I believe the Spanish and French wikis do the same thing. +No big deal, just thought you would want to know. +This also applies to all your other image uploads. +Your edit to Rapture Thank you for experimenting with the page Rapture on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +" Very bizarre indeed. I'll take no action, but I very much doubt another admin will unblock. Best,  (talk) " +Not before I report you for not following wikipolicy and activly engaging an edit war when you had been reverted and should have come here but activly carried warring and bullying and not coming up with any constructive or rational reason why it should remain. If you can't it will ultimatly be deleted. +" A blog post I think is important First, I appreciate the notes that were left recently, and the ones left during the February drama. I will probably be back, but not like I was before. I love Wikimedia and everything it is trying to do. I wanted to be a part of it. More, I wanted to show its potential. The worst misconception about me is that I am arrogant about my work. I most want people to realize that everything I did, they can do too. You don't even need to do what I did; your own secret hopes and ambitions on here have the potential to succeed. It's not self-promotion. If you are contributing work of such high quality that you could actually make a career for yourself, then Wikipedia is damn lucky to have you. If what you give is crap, face it: your stuff will be removed, nobody will stick up for you and you'll have zero hopes of ever branching beyond Wikipedia. This is important: you should strive to contribute material that is of such high quality people actually think you could be a professional (but the ridiculous argument that you are using Wikipedia to doing that is stupid beyond belief). I outlined on my blog how I went about doing what I did on here, how you could replicate it if you wanted, and general advice. I don't care if anyone follows it. But I certainly hope it explains how unexceptional my contributions were; that is, if only other people attempted what I did. I'm an artist - I wanted to work on here and give something back. But I never wish to be a professional photographer or journalist/reporter. I realize that's a shock for many to believe. Wikipedia is a great public space to attempt art, whether it be journalism and information as art, or photography that is encyclopedic before it is artistic. Here's the blog post where I try to explain how I succeeded to gain access, improved my photography and made a reputation for myself simply for doing what I believed in on Wikipedia: blog.shankbone.org/2008/07/19/david-shankbone-finally-tells-you-how-to-replicate-his-success.aspx If contributing high quality work that is recognized on and off Wikipedia is self-promotion, then we need more self-promoters who try to create such high quality. David '''''' " +Sounds like a plan mannnn +. Thanks. I've replaced one and will look for replacement for the other. +"==dont leave== Wikipedia needs people like you. Remeber a time when there was no content on Hinduism in Indonesia, Gedong Bagus Oka and Parisada Hindu Dharma ? Remember a time when Category:Hindu politicians was a small struggling cat? Remember a time when Category:Hindu monarchs had no members, its thanks to us that these cats and these areas are encyclopedic now, and will continue to be down the road.man indonesia We should start working on the Indonesian articles again. Tokoh Indonesia is a good resource. See id:Pengguna:Tokohbaka. The good part is that Sanskrit derived words are ok in Indonesian, making it easy for us to contribute, and its in Latin script. Mostly I add Category:Tokoh Hindu to pages.man I have something for you! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. Image tagging for Image:Rwsage.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Rwsage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Hindutva propaganda What is your opinion on this, it's a phenomenon ripping Wikipedia apart from the seams, with fanatical supporters of Swami Vivekananda and his RSS revising history to make people believe lies. Think of all the children that enter Wikipedia and see this revisionist history and will need deprogramming in the future. I commend our maintsream admins. I support the neutrality and common non-OR sense of our admins. By the way, did you know that Swami Vivekananda himself used to write propaganda and publish it in Voice of India. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.139.138 . Christianity in Myanmar A content dispute is not vandalism. Grow up. National stubs Hi there, Just a small suggestion: When you stubsort (such as you did in the article Hinduism in Tanzania), please include the national stub (Tanzania-stub in this case). Good work otherwise. Thanks Religious Articles You've tagged a lot of religious articles, particularly, but not limited to Catholic articles, for lack of notability. Some of these might have been taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia. What do you expect for reference material? Explanation of religious organization is fairly basic to society. The articles could be much better referenced, I suppose. Do you have a good example someplace of what you are looking for? For example, you have tagged the first Catholic diocese in the US, Baltimore, for lacking notability. Are you just tagging American dioceses? I am interested in your thoughts here. Are you looking for lots of footnotes? External references? Thanks. The Jesus Christ article can have +could you find a source.....during the sept. 28th live chat with i believe an executive producer of the show when asked if the fate of shakespeare was ever known he replied no +" Thanks Thanks for taking the time to vote in my RfA, which passed with a final vote of 54/2/1 despite my obvious inadequacy for the job. I'll do my level best to use the mop and bucket — or, as I said in my RfA, plunger — responsibly. Of course, in the best tradition of politicans everywhere, I've already broken a campaign promise (I blocked a vandal last night despite having said ""I don't anticipate using the blocking tool very often""). Nevertheless, I'll try not to let the unbridled power corrupt me. — (talk • contribs) " +Miss Tourism World is run by the THE BIGGEST con man on the planet NEARLY ALL OF THE SOURCE provide for this sanitized version are bogus and do not contain any valid information>>>>>>>>>> administrators follow you high an mighty rules Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Most links are to sealed websites and also you say Miss Tourism World 2009 is scheduled to take place in Kazakhstan.[19 ON 8TH SEPTEMBER 2008………. Guys get you head out of you A***es This article is about Miss Tourism World not Miss Tourism World Zambia>>>>> YET YOU PROVIDE INFO ON Miss Tourism World Zambia? http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-21334868_ITM YOU GUYS KILL ME WITH YOUR SO CALLED INTELLIGENCE AND FEEL GOOD ATTITUDE but you are all just so very b stupid at times!!! +HE IS FICTIONAL AND EVERY CHILD OF EVERY AGE SHOULD KNOW JUST LIKE I DID WHEN I FIRST HEARD OF SANTA WHEN I WAS 4 YEARS OLD. +" The information stated here appear to be direct research. I couldn't find any ""reliable published source"" which confirms the claims made." +" Notification about my contesting talkpage block Writkeeper, I asked Blackmane, who had offered to raise my situation at WP:AN/ANI on a slightly different point, to raise it to review Kww's block of my talkpage to me based on WP:CANVASSING. Here is FYI, and if you have any other ideas, they'd be welcome. Kww is treading on your toes too if he didn't communicate with you beforehand, as you were the one who unblocked my page to me not long ago. This is Colt on Co5mic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.65.53 " +Now that this accident has been confirmed, clearly US Airways only has 353 airplanes remaining. - +No it is your comment that is trolling. Do you expect to be taken seriously? +to me when you have something substantial to tell me. +Arrghh...im sick of these stupid blocks i.p blocks! +Infamous Why is the masked passage in Eyes wide shut called infamous in the article? +" Yes, and on that note, I read WP:IMGSIZE, and it specifically states; In general, do not use px without very good reason; upright=scaling factor is preferred wherever sensible. Where px is used, the resulting image should be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices in common use. I do have a ""very good reason"", the text below the image was unreadable at it's previous size. Additionally, the policy further states that the upsize is not to exceed ""500 pixels"". I only upsized to 250. Therefor, I did not violate IMGSIZE. However, it appears that the 2 editors, and an admin, that while quoting this policy did not read it. The editors blindly reverts my edit, clearly without bothering to look at the impact of the revert, and now an admin has blindly blocked me for... what? An image policy I did not violate? An edit warring policy I did not violate? A harassment policy I did not violate? There is also an accusation of rudeness, that I dispute. I had, if anything, shown my aggravation at what is becoming a growing problem here. The constant pushing of poorly crafted and poorly understood policies, through the practice of blind reverts, often to the detriment of the article and therefore the project. If my comments came across as rude, I do apologize, but the reverts were unnecessary, as was this block. - '''' " +SpikeToronto Is Gay RCP +" Wikipedia getting used by Chinese chauvinist propagandists Surf around the topics on Tibet, (China-occupied, Inner-) Mongolia and so called ""Xinjiang"" or Sinkiang, or simply just the topics on ""ethnic minorities of China"". Make sure to consult experts with consciounce and nuetrality. Write me back if you want to hear more at dugarjab at yahoo dot kom." +baklawa sweets that picture is not baklava.its kadayıf actually. +" Ok Bobrayner, I will refrain from posting to the main definition of Inertial_Propulsion, if you will recognize my efforts in the field in the Discussion page. I TOTALLY understand that controversial subjects that have the mantle of Dogma on it's shoulders has an uphill battle. I only request that others look over what I have done in the field, and debate the evidence, rather than throw stones at ""the other"", that does NOT conform to current beliefs. Do you have any creative suggestions for how to add the GIT (Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster) definition of machine types to the main page? It is a clearly novel approach to the subject, and has had positive (as well as negative) results in the real world. ""Force Rectifying"" angular accelerations to produce linear acceleration as a ""footloose"" example of ""tractoring"" on the ""Zero Point Field"" has actual physical examples to give it credence, but the intolerance of science as a religion prevents rational debate, and examination. When I whirl around on a merry-go-round, the forces I feel tugging me off of that ride, to the outside, are NOT a result of tiny bullets, impinging on me! ALL of matter, that has ""inertia"" feels it's place in this universe through some kind of interaction with the universe around it. While the ""Aether"" was discredited because it did NOT conform to our definition of a classical gas, the Zero Point Field (Rueda, Puthoff, and Haisch), describes a coupling of baryonic matter with it's surroundings. This is the medium that the GIT series of thrusters ""tractor"" on. I am a fairly simple guy, with beliefs engendered by my experiences, and I refuse to ""toe the party line"", when reality, trumps ""faith"". " +One more Testing 1-2. +John and Peter Middleton I've got what I've got in Terry Frost's book from 1988 and David Markhams's Legends book just out, in which only John is featured. +" June 2011 (UTC) you ll find readers read what they like, not necessarily ""in full"". what is the downside of the year in heading please??124.171.43.176 01:35, 19" +" Ill just edit your bio to make a link to my page. Thanks for helping with this! tc " +Bold textYPU GUYS FUCKEN SUCK!!! +dont try to spook me you dick! +In fact Goda died circus 1047, and Eustache married Ida about 1049. Regards, +" Trivial trivia A piece of trivia was added about the main event ending in submission three out of the last four years. This is not notable, and constitutes OR. Noting how the main event ended is already listed in the match, and only saying ""three out of the last four years"" seems odd, why not three out of the last five years or ten years? " +When I am being asked to repeat myself on a medium that promotes rereading I really do despair. Filll's first point here is irrelevant as I have already made it very clear that I couldn't care less about which version is used. The answer to his second point would be easy to find if he reread what I have written. violet/riga (t) +" I only go here when I'm bored or when I feel like bashing this encyclopedia and and its members I don't like. My dream (and other professionals, scientists, and etc...) is for this stie to shut down. Am Ri¢h!" +Looks like I picked a bad night to be busy. I'll look into DYKHousekeepingBot when I have time. Will try to get it up and running before Friday. As for DYKUpdateBot, it was having connectivity issues, but the recovery code did indeed trigger, and the bot seems to be fine now. On a slightly related note, I've been thoroughly unimpressed with Labs' responsiveness (not replying to communication at all), so that's delaying bot migration from Toolserver to Labs. Thanks everyone. +" Vandalism warning Stop issuing vandalism warnings to Binksternet. You have a content disagreement. Claiming that constitutes vandalism is an assumption of bad faith. If you issue another warning of that kind you may be blocked for disruptive editing. I note that you blanked the edit-warring notice, which I take as an acknowledgement that it has been read and understood. Please adopt a less aggressive tone in your interactions with other users. (talk) " +" Fair use rationale for Image:Alegranza.JPG Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alegranza.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  (Parrot) " +Casus Belli again Please read the article on wikipedia for United Nations Security Resolution 1559. It is REAL and it EXISTS! I will repeat what I stated earlier: On top of what we already have for the casus belli, it should be added that if Hezbollah had been disarmed as stated in the United Nations Security Resolution 1559, this conflict would not have happened. There would have been no Hezbollah and therefore no Hezbollah raid. This is part of the casus belli. Let's keep the facts! On another note, it is pretty outrageous to call this a vandalism. Please read the wikipedia article on the United Nations Security Resolution 1559. It specifically states that Hezbollah must be disarmed. Many nations and media sources have stated that if the resolution had been followed, this conflict would not have happened. +Message for an old, white, asian rooter. Will you stop sending death threats to me please. If these persist I will notify the authorities on you and they will lock you up for a long time. I am also sending a message to an admin, to get you blocked. Cheers, 122.106.64.93 +" Yes, just recently, we proposed renaming the page from Transsexuality to Transsexualism, so it appears to be a very controversial issue. As the Definitions section of this article suggests, not everyone will be happy with any single term. For examples, Jennifer Diane Reitz refers to ""transsexuality"" and Lynn Conway refers to ""transsexualism."" If you search ""transsexuality"" and ""transsexualism"" on Google, you will find more hits for ""transsexualism."" Reality Resources, an ex-trans ministry, frequently uses ""transsexuality,"" and to me, ""transsexuality"" sounds like a sexual orientation. Of course, some people do not like either of these terms. For example, some people prefer Benjamin's syndrome [], but that definitely sounds like a disease. Andrea James has proposed the term ""interest in feminization"" for transsexual women who plan to transition. She feels like that term would encompass all persons who transition from male to female, or desire to do so, including those who do so for non-traditional reasons. While I do not feel like the medical community should stop people from transitioning for non-traditional reasons, I also feel like this terminology suggests that transsexualism is a chosen behavior. I feel that transsexualism is an inborn characteristic, but I don't believe that it should be called a disease. All said, I feel like Transsexualism is the best title for the Wikipedia article on the subject. Given the recent replies to this comment, and the recent move debate, I feel like consensus has already been established. " +Just letting you know, I've already dropped off an {{npa3}} in response to this one. ) +" Vandalism? I'm confused about what exactly made my edit ""vandalism"". I can produce many sources to validate my claim, if you like. It is a very common practice in some parts of the world, my parents both did it to me as I was growing up, did me a world of good. Seems like another case of a WP editor thinking that the practices in their part of the world apply everywhere. Such a narrow minded person, you are... 65.78.144.186 " +What the hell is wrong with this thing ? why are my changes not showing? +Flowers is just some backup characters she has nothing to do with whoever Ramona is. Just add Season 2 please seriously if you don't know 2-4 months from now you're gonna feel like a dumbass like you are. +" Rather than have Folken once again try to ""game the system"" and then accuse me of being domineering when I try to revert his mistakes, who else here honestly prefers what he did over what was here before? 1-it is not ""Original Research"" it is clarifying what was a confusing point 2-I don't care if I've ""hurt your feelings"", but...yes, the explanation you substituted wasn't proper English and just said ""one quarter German and Japanese"" etc.....if I don't like it I should write it better? Yikes. Folken I'm not going to help you in defacing an article 3-once again, you're doing surprisingly little ""actual work"" but simply quoting rules and ""gaming the system"" without contributing much of any real value 4-Folken, I'm not going to hand you a crown for quoting rules out of context for your own benefit, nor am I taking such threats seriously. You would use the letter of the law to destroy the spirit of the law. 5-Folken, how many times can I say this? I'll be more direct: you are not an Administrator, and have no real authority or ""sticking power"" to maintain a revert. I'm going to revert your awful changes, and let me guess; you're going to revert them back and claim ""revert war""? Yikes. I am not ""gaming the system"". Please explain what you mean by that instead of throwing random bad faith accusation. You cannot revert ""mistakes"" as I haven't done any, contrary to you. Or again, please prove what mistakes I would have committed, instead of blindly reverting and justifying your actions with unsubstanciated and gratuitous accusations. 1) No, making things up about the never-mentionned nationality or appearance of never-seen characters, or about the supposed lives of characters prior to the series (the dual-citizenship) that are never mentionned, is original research. There is no need of ""clarifying"" with OR a point that is self-explanatory. 2) Again, your words are not the word of God. You can use all the excuses you want, like ""improper english"", it still won't work as you are unable to prove anything you're saying. And yes, you are going to rewrite instead of remove. Otherwise, it means your ""proper english"" is just an unsubstanciated pretext. If you refuse to reword, then it means there's nothing to reword and that it's already proper english. Your bad faith accusation of ""defacing"" are considered as a personal attack. You have now been warned. 3) ""Actual work"" includes getting rid of unsuitable edits like yours. And yes, quoting rule is an important thing in WP as rules define how contributors must work on WP. So yes, correcting the edits of users like you who don't give a damn about the rules and make unsuitable edits is a huge ""actual"" work. Also, you still fail to explain what ""gaming the system"" means...Don't throw random accusations. 4) ""Quoting rules out of context"" seems to be your favorite attack. But please explain how what I said would be ""out of context"". You're quick in accusing and insulting, not in actually proving your point...And yes, I'm serious. 5) I'll be clear, VVVVV, you are not an Administrator, and have no real authority or ""sticking power"" to maintain a revert. The thing is, you're not going to revert anything, unless you've forgotten your little speech about ""consensus"" and ""community effort""...I have not see you discussing anything about content or asking anyone's opinion. Sure, you've stated all the hatred you have for me, but it doesn't count as consensus discussion. So, to sum it up, you accuse me of ""being an admin"" because I oppose to your edits, but you don't have any problem with mass reverting without any justification ? enough of this. Cooler heads prevailing: yes, I have indeed not changed your reversion, and I will wait for what everyone else has to say. (I didn't mean that last part about ""what if I change it back?"" literally..nevermind). but on to point 2: specifically, your profile says that English is not your primary language, and you added in a sentence that didn't make sense; leading me to suspect that you are honestly mistaken. Not in grammar or something, I mean it was confusing. Why should I help you make a reversion I disagree with in the first place? And if it's because you're quoting a literal translation of a Red Cross Book excerpt....Folken you honestly know that the literal translation is choppy and needs to be smoothed out. These aren't ""my"" edits Folken: the article as it exi +"How convenient you people would find my contribution non-constructive! Any bit of information that might reveal something other than what you have been trained to believe is a ""no-no"" apparently. How sad that is:( I guess only YOUR word is law right? Well, I intend to appeal this by any means necessary and I will protest your actions against me! " +I was the one the put this page up, and, when I brought ministry of dreams to net, it did not exist, God hid it till He spoke and created. +(UTC) The proper source is http://www.ncaa.com, with the histories of the individual sports (lists of annual champions) being at .../history/baseball/d1, .../history/basketball/d1, and .../history/football/fbs. 19:56, 25 April 2012 +What would be the correct pronunciation in English? +those are serious accusations that you are making, the ip's dont match and you are suggesting that I am a troll, thats a personal attack, I am reporting you! +Investigation please don't interfere +" page! Questions? Concerns? Post them below! |- | style=""text-align:left; padding: 8px; background-color:#98FF98""| Please leave a message. Discussion archives User:Karimarie That was me editting my page. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks for reminding me to log in, though. ) 69.118.94.155 Thank you for putting that vandalism notice on 69.118.94.155's talkpage. This anon has done this countless times, won't listen to reason, and just vandalized my userpage . Please keep a close eye on him! Thank you for the block. He was being quite immature, there. Iloveminun Thank you for reverting all of Rainbow Sneakers I requested a check user, and I've found Po132 and Minun132 are the same person and Iloveminun and PokemonFan are the same person. What should I do now? Rainbow Sneakers PokemonFan was used vote in a controversial TfD after Iloveminun (who nominated the template) got told to stop voting delete. PokemonFan also vandalised the user page of the admin taking part in the vote who wouldn't delete it for him. It's more of a larger problem by Iloveminun, who is trying to replace Serebii, a valued and incredibly useful website most of the actually reference, from hundreds of Pokémon articles (first he tried to remove the template that links to it manually, then from the template that produces references in all the Pokémon articles and replace it with his own website, Pokémon Galaxy. Pokémon Galaxy is not at present even finished, but it seems to be pushing it. Which is how I got caught in everything. (Bit odd how I caught the real sockpuppet when I was originally way off) Thanks, Rainbow Sneakers I will. Is Minun132 being abusive? Hmm, I had missed that. Thank you for the offer, I will wait for your return since this is a new situation for me. Thanks again, Rainbow Sneakers Nah, I'm writing I'm just ill. And getting sidetracked. It's nearly done. Cheers, Rainbow Sneakers Is there any particular way to do it? Or do I just note notarize the points and link to the evidence? Rainbow Sneakers Done, you can find it here. Sorry for the wait, I'm feeling bad and Mailer Diablo and I were discussing FAC problems. Cheers, Rainbow Sneakers We did it! Thank you for all the help, I feel slightly embarrassed that someone who has been here a month in so much more knowledgable than I am in certain aspects. If you ever need a hand with something (Fair use, FAC, GA) just drop me a bell. Cheers, Rainbow Sneakers That does explain a lot, I didn't expect a newbie reverting vandalism within 40 edits. How long have you been around then? [[User:HighwayCello/Esper +" Re: reply at Jimbo You're right here about ""condoned by Jimbo (a regular victim of rudeness)"". I think he's too soft and not tough enough and that sets the examples for every one else across the whole site and ultimately it results in people being rude and aggressive and no one being willing to do anything about it because the founder doesnt care or think its that important. I gave the links out before on Jimbo's page but here's one person who should have been blocked indef. That whole block log is a joke. So he continues today making personal attacks, rude and aggressive comments (,) and he's allowed to roam free - all because the founder isnt tough enough. In addition to that ofcourse other users () and so on. In trying to tolerate dissident voices as you said, we're now in a situation where other editors have to take in abuse from trolls who are well aware of the power they command here. (talk•contribs) " +" Oh. Yeah, I hate when that happens, like other reviewers review thoroughly before you. Looks like we got our own edit war going D.CO " +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Oldag07 I am sorry for seeming so aggressive. I am a Corps Member in Columbus, Ohio. I'd like to meet you at Cyzygy if you are available. We aren't a big site, so it shouldn't be too difficult to find me. City Year so far has been a trying but ultimately positive experience. This year has taught me so much about myself and about the world, and have grown up leaps and bounds. Helping with this page is the least I can do to give back. If you could pass this thanks to the higher ups, I would be very grateful. City Year is definitely entitled to put stuff on Wikipedia, but please keep this in mind: WP:SOAP. To be quite honest with you, writing is not one of my strengths. There are ways to rephrase what I have said that are better. From what I have wrote, however, i have attempted to create multi sourced statements. When editing this page, unless the outside source as been completely removed, it is a good idea to leave the outside sources in the page. I already have some good outside sources already mentioned in the article: City_Year#References. To save you time, you can use some of these existing outside sources in addition to the main CY site stuff for sources. For example, the first source on this page is something from the Fast Company website. it is titled (Ctl F to find that). In order to cite statements with a source that is already inputed into a page, one only needs to add a ""/"" to the reference tag: ""."" For example: Hello everyone. City Year is cool. How are you doing today? I am doing great Here is some more help with citing sources: Wikipedia:Citing_sources. I hope that helps out some. Than you for your hard work and see you in June. " +Also spammed Issaquah, Washington, Bellevue, Washington and White Center, Washington +If you truly want these articles you and to improve wikipedia you'd help me and fix any issues you see yourself rather than making every tiny one of them known to me. The way you conduct yourself is belligerent, as if you enjoy the conflict. +" In that case, you have a few options, from most preferable to least: When you see that citations are needed, be bold and add proper citations Don't do anything; complain instead The door is thattaway, don't let it hit you on the way out The reason for the verifiability policy and the necessity for citations is that any user ought, in a perfect world, to be able to check the source him- or herself in order to ascertain the veracity of the article. With over two million articles and who knows how many tens of millions of page views per day, do you really think it's reasonable to expect people all over the world to field calls? ""Yes, I'm a geneticist, yes, that's what I said.. can I please go back to unravelling the DNA of cancer? You're my 383792th +(i.e. outside France/US) +Haha, again, loving it ') +General ==== No dab links. Great work! No dead links. Great work! ==== +Nah but seriously, how do you leave messages on this Blog???? Its pritty confusing!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +I hate you Zad68 unblock me you stupid motherfucker +Documentation AN Revision as of 21:05, 14 February 2010 Future Perfect at Sunrise m (rv; user has been blocked for harassment and trolling) +Oi!! Please do not remove me abusing other wikipedians dickhead! +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already). There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome! RJaguar3 | | t Speedy deletion of ""Jonathan Mallett"" A page you created, Jonathan Mallett, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. RJaguar3 | | t " +" ""Commonly known as rape"" was not in any of the sources. You seem to want it both ways in this article. You've argued at times in favor of presenting sexual assault more broadly but now insist on a narrow term it when it wasn't described that way by the source. This is classic WP:SYN to pick one source, and apply it another. Source A describes ""rape"" as X, source B describes ""sexual assault"" as Y, ergo X=Y. These studies often purposefully stay away from the term, and use ""sexual assault"" broadly. Either we rely on the sources, or we don't. Wikipedia favors the latter. " +REDIRECT Talk:Clodius Celsinus Adelphius +your answer doesn't explain to me who is reviewing this particular piece of kryptonite. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Archbishop Ryan High School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +All of these uses are gross and improper. End of discussion. +" Original research issues The following bits are being removed since they are original research claims by Berlet. Please include a reference and show how the reference supports the claim (and use NPOV language, not POV wording such as “showed that the organizers around Newman had lied”): 1.TAB“…because an extensive investigation by Berlet and others involved in the Public Eye network showed that the organizers around Newman had lied when they denied their continued participation in a secret cadre organziation operating under the prinples of Leninist ""democratic centralism."" This claim is not supported with a reference 2. “Serrette later joined in denouncing Newman, Fulani, and the NAP for lying about the continued existence of the secret Leninist cadre organization run by Newman under the name International Workers Party which was the secret control group running the New Alliance Party.” Not supported by reference " +Does pigment affect the amount of heat absorbed? +Contested Prod I think this report from Gartner shows sufficient notability that the prod was not appropriate. The Dissident Aggressor +I appreciate your help, thanks, man. +"To whom it may concern. hello I am a student in a univeristy computer lab was hoping to add relevant discussion to several articles which i am researching. However when i clicked on ""edit page"" a message appeared stating this IP address was blocked. I searched the IP address and found this ""user talk"" page which clearly showed individuals were using Wikipedia immaturely. Is it possible to undo the block so that i may complete my school work. The room is crowded with others ingaged in group work so relocation to an unblocked computer is not really an option for me. i thank you for taking the time to read this statement, have a good evening, sincerely, Amanda " +(UTC) It seems I'm coming to the party a bit late, but I wanted just to say that I think you handled the matter very well. Best, '''''' 21:10, 14 January 2012 +"==Speedy deletion== Hey, I just finished writing this article and it is for speedy deletion. I think the article is well written and has enough sources. I'm not promoting Songr, I just wrote about it, its features etc. Please, some help here! [ Let's talk ] " +Whatever. 68.1.89.162 +Keep this for record from: From: Lika Valentino (valentino669@msn.com) Sent:Sun 4/06/08 8:51 PM To: washington.field@ic.fbi.gov (washington.field@ic.fbi.gov); FBI OFFICE (newyork@fbi.gov) Send this to me Mark Mershon who is on with her at this moment, battling with an editing war on wikipedia.org under Ali Khamenei. Make sure the person who keeps on removing lika valentino diplomat aka alla khameini etc.., posts with my legal authorizations this person higlighted is removed himself not Lika, bye bye, do not ever remove our intelligence postings on WIKPEDIA make a last statement to this person following this line This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk +These are public computers. Don't ban uss all because a few people are retarded. +Ranze, there was no harassment or disruption. Note the lack of examples (diffs), or, if a diff is provided (which I did), read through it. Nothing there deserved a block. WP is broken. +" Oct 1961 to Oct 1962 Armament The following information was moved to the talk page from main article At least During my Duty on the USS Newell (DER322) between Oct1961 and Oct1962 she was armed with enclosed dual 3""-50 Cal. Guns and two Hedge Hog Antisubmarine Munitions Launchers, among other things. As to when the Gun complement was changed will need to be investigated by others. My memory is Vague as to if we had two or three such dual mounts. All of them were capable of coupling to a Flying Bridge level Gun fire director for coordinated targeting. At the same time we had both a surface search radar and a separate Air Search radar installation. From my memories, we had four 10 cylinder F-M Opposed Crank Diesel main engines, two per shaft, and additional 8 cylinder F-M Opposed Crank Diesels coupled to Generators for ships Electric Power. William j. Stewart ETC USN Retired (served as a Deck seaman on the USS Newell before leaving to attend ET Schools in the Navy.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 21:45, March 7, 2015‎" +I replied on your talk page and at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Help for a new editor. +I really hope it's not true How terrifying would it be to live in a world where everyone around you dies while you miraculously keep on living. A few centuries in your deteriorating body, you'll be wishing for death and all to no avail. +Yay! Please convey my thanks to PeterSymonds for pwning the real... he knows... ) +" Hard to Be Human ...qualifies as WP:CSD#A9. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) " +Last call Would you please make sure that the last call for arbcom candidates goes into the monday edition of the signpost. +" Humankind is a disgusting word, and doesn't even solve the problem. Bring your attention to ""huMANkind"" No quite seeing the difference. " +Oh, never mind. I misread the change. My mistake. Egern +Talk Page content now being deleted? Can you please give me some advise on this as I understood the talk page was for exactly that, TALKING!78.33.101.58 +" Regarding the writer at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hitler_salute Mr Barlow is a nutter with an obsession. The history of the salute is now improved in the Roman salute article (which had many previous visits from Dr. Curry in the past - see its talk page). The pact between the National Socialist German Workers' Party and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is not well known, and is also not covered widely on Wikipedia, so it is ""covered up"" by people and also people often refer to it as the ""Nazi-Soviet"" pact (as the writer above does) which avoids ever using the actual name of the horrid Party (the National Socialist German Workers' Party) and reinforces the hackneyed use of the shorthand ""Nazi"" and the myth that members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party referred to themselves as ""Nazis"" (they did not refer to themselves as ""Nazis""). Some people (note the writer above) try to evade the point with odd comments such as ""It wasn't invented by Wikipedia editors to conceal the word 'socialism'!"" That comment does not dispute the fact that there are people who use the word ""Nazi"" to avoid ever stating the actual name of the party: The National Socialist German Workers' Party. Not only is that done in the title of the page cited (the Nazi-Soviet pact page) it is done on that entire article where the actual name of the Party never appears nor even the phrase ""National Socialist."" The writer above also makes constant use of the shorthand ""Nazi"" even when discussing the very topic at hand. The Bellamy salute was not originally the same as the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, as noted by Professor Curry. However, as anyone who looks at Dr. Curry's historic photographs of the salute can see, it developed into the same salute as that of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Even the writer above concedes Dr. Curry's point that the flag was saluted with a normal military-style salute and then the arm was straightened out toward the flag during the oath. The writer above tellingly evades the point that the use of the military salute led to the change in the salute to the U.S. flag. It is as if the writer above is conceding the point made. Indeed, the writer seems to concede it with the comment ""Anyway, even if the gesture had been the same, so what? It's just a gesture. The Soviets used conventional salutes, does that mean that the US military are Communists because they use the same gesture as the Soviet military!"" It is fascinating how the writer again avoids the actual name ""Union of Soviet Socialist Republics"" and also used the term ""Communist"" instead of using the term ""Socialist."" The writer then attempts to avoid the issue, which is the origin of the straight-arm salute, and tries to turn the issue into an odd argument about whether the salutes dictated particular dogmas. Nevertheless, the writer evades the topic that Professor Curry has raised, which is that Francis Bellamy and Edward Bellamy were self-proclaimed National Socialists in the USA three decades before the National Socialist German Workers' Party, and Edward's book was an international bestseller, translated into every major language (including German, which Edward spoke and wrote, and where Edward had studied as a young man) and that Edward's dogma inspired ""Nationalism"" clubs worldwide including in Germany. Yes, the ""Roman salute"" page did once contain innaccuracies, and the writer above is to be thanked for conceding that point. But that is no reason for the writer to start going on with his use of the term ""conspiracy."" It's just what you get when you have an open encyclopedia! The point is to correct error when you see it, and to not delete those corrections when they are made by people like Dr. Curry. The writer above also concedes that he is the Wikipedia editor who ""became wiser"", by incorporating Professor Curry's discoveries. The writer is to be thanked for crediting Dr. Curry with making it more widely available. It should be noted that the valuable information that Professor Curry provides is his own discovery. Dr. Curry has also mentioned that the material about the use of the Roman salute in films derives from an academic article by Martin Winkler. Professor Curry pointed out that Martin Winkler did not realize at the time of Winkler's article that the films were all pre-dated by the use of the salute in the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. Dr. Curry has also publicly challenged Martin Winkler to debate these issues. Professor Curry's discovery that the swastika/hakenkreuz, although an ancient symbol, was sometimes used by the National Socialist German Workers' Party as ""S"" shapes standing for its ""Socialism"" is also his own original work. And he is right that other writers have deliberately covered up the discovery (as the writer above admits) and have excluded it from the Swa +CROCKSPOT...YOU MUST REALIZE THAT YOU NEVER WILL BE AN ADMIN... THEY ( THE DUOL WILL NEVER ALLOW YOU HAVE THAT POWER..ONLY PINK COMMIES, LIKE ELEEMOSYNARY WILL BE PROTECTED AND ENABLED. MY PURPOSE IS TO JUST TAKE UP BANDWIDTH AND DISK SPACE...WIKIPEDIA HAS NO RESPECT IN THE REAL WORLD.. +Hello, can you unblock this computer im not sure who blocked it by this IP address is not able to edit. i am not the original instigator. thank you +Your general not coolitude Is this the best you can do? You banned Kinghy permanently for much less than what I did. You suck at life (and Wikipedia). +Do you have a source for the OMIR no longer being traded? If so, we should add it as a reference and stop adding these fluctuations to the article. +Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Marie Antoinette, you may be blocked from editing. +User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. +" Mallaig Extension Railway Does the Mallaig Extension Railway really qualify as a ""Historical Railway"", given that: it's still open from end to end, and it's actually of quite recent origin, relatively speaking? I think it does. Having worked along the C&OR; and up the WHL to Fort William; Banavie Peir came to mind; and the Invergarry and For Augustus Railway. For completeness I felt it is relevant. Linking into the NBR and then onto the LNER - detail still to be added. Loch Eil Outward Bound is a station that is not included. The West Highland Railway is another issue that need thought - for the same reason. " +" ""Alleged"" Anti-semitic comments? Nothing is alleged. Those comments were anti-semitic, plain and simple. Not taken out of context. While it is okay to present both sides of an argument, there really is no defence, and Farrakhan, who himself is an anti-semite, is not an adequate spokesperson to be used to defend Kanye.70.73.141.146 " +While the edge map image is probably a copyright problem, please be aware that the other two copyright problems that you mention(I believe you are refering to the two photos of people) are probably considered fair use under US copyright law. Those photos may be tagged with {{Promophoto}}. Also, any scans of the book covers of the Edge Chronicles would also be fair use in that article, tagged with {{Bookcover}}, so you may want to consider using an image of the book cover to illustrate that article instead. If you'd like any help don't hesitate to ask. As always, we appreciate your contributions. 06:26, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC) PS. you can visit Wikipedia:Image copyright tags to see a list of tags that you can apply to images. +Okay, I figured it out - it was Robert Senter that ratted, not Anthony Senter. Still, Senter has a rat in his family. +Look, the award doesn't exist any more how can you not understand that? It clearly states http://www.fifa.com/ballondor/aboutgala/index.html here] that the Ballon d'Or and FIFA World Player of the Year Award were MERGED. Therefore its two different processes merged together, and a new award created. Its not hard to understand. +NPOV The authors opinion at the end of the summary should be fixed. WP:NPOV +" I'm leavin' Wikipedia. It got too stupid and I hate such stupidity. ChrisGriswold blocked me hours after I made a ""personal attack"", and from there, all hell went loose. I've recently joined a Smash Bros. forum in case anyone is curious as to where I am on the net. and shall be retiring too. Salutations - " +Nothing else along that line of thought (hounding). Yes, it irelated to those discussions. Sorry for not posting a few links, but I had to attend to some things off-wiki, but wanted to get the note in first. And yes, I'm not the only editor concerned here, but he does seem to be taking this one personally. Thanks for the comments, and I'll let you know of any further developments. - +It just goes to show stupid Mario was, btw Raintheone well done but as i said above that just is not enough to stop me;) 86.46.249.176 +" From the FBI 26 Federal Plaza we are on an EDITING WAR at this moment with someone on WIKIPEDIA final say by us Federal Agents, CIA Agents, and this Diplomat, argue with me Ali Kkhamenei if you are using my name and so likeness on this site, soon I will relinquish this site with my likeness and all of my information on WIKIPEDIA, if you had any legal rights at all, than you would not have touched this post, touch up on EDIT of WIKIPEDIA, this stays and we will place an editing command of not taking this out, by someone. You want to call me in at 26 Federal Plaza, at 212-384-5000 this stays, and you will be taken out not this person who places editing rights by her Dignitary rights. Someone is ruining this EDIT on WIKIPEDIA by Federal, Central, and other head of state dignitary rights. Personal Governmental Order, and Family Life Tree of Order NRGC's Page of Iranian Military Khamenei has four sons and 3 daughters, Mojtaba, Mostafa, Massoud, Maysam, Boshra, and Hoda, and Alla Khamenei aka Lika Valentino Citizen of U.S., Diplomat Dignitary, daughter to Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is residing in NY under International Protection provided by UK, Canada, Australia, and Japan and U.S. Domestic FBI [NY] Intelligence Protection Program. [Living on Central Intelligence Papers/Identification]. According to [Gholam Ali Haddad-Adel] he has an austere lifestyle. www.cia.gov “ point of notion to take into serious affect do NOT touch or alter this page on Grand Ayatollah Khamenei/Khameini, a warning from the CIA Division never again alter, or replace information, I will run any individual off of the streets of whatever State or Nation. ” According to CIA Director General Michael Hayden, and FBI Director Robert Mueller, and President Bush, PM Gordon Brown, his daughter Alla aka Lika [Diplomat friend to the CIA and FBI, and U.S. of A] has taken control of Iran/Persia since of 2007 delegating with a stealth iron democratic force, within Government Affairs, Diplomatic Relations, and other State National Human and Civil Rights Issues, combating Terrorism on a National Global Perspective under her fathers control of Iran, who will be residing over Iran after Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, presently delegating over Elite Guards, Iranian Ministry of Defense and Iranian Parliament, State and National Laws guiding Civilian Lives, Laws, within Relations. According to President Ahmadinejad in 2008 of April 6, do not touch this print ever on the 'Personal and Family Life,' he has one wife, and 7 children, I would know better what Grand Ayatollah Khamenei has, does, concedes over, of how many children he may have, and what they do, and on the austere life style of his within his children's backgrounds, than any other intelligence officer or anthropologist, and historian. Be advised this one daughter of Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, has shortly, within the time span started to over throw the Persian Nation same as Khomeini in 1979 but in a different manner of political opposition, with support backing by the Iranian Ministries of Intelligence Divisions, Parliament and International UN Member States, as it has been slowly, with names of Military Divisions changes, Regulations, Laws, placement and displacement of Diplomatic Iranian Personnel into Iranian Government Offices, concluded official the name Persia officially in public on Iranian Intelligence Docket Systems, so forth since of 2006 presently in the process, as supported with backing by U.S. Officials, and President Bush. [CNN News witness credibility, do not touch this page, one would be misinforming on his personal austere life style, with family brackground, Democratic Freedom will prevail in Iran.] As stated by me Lika aka Alla, I would know better of who my father is, has done, so forth of how many children he has bared with his wife aka mother, notation or on his family life. National Laws ""it is NOT an Islamic Republic it's a Persian, diversified Nation, the Laws for coordination of Human and Civil Rights, Dress Code Law has been removed from Iranian Government Regulations for women and men, as example 'women do not have to wear any scarves unless they chose so,' just keep yourselves covered same as in any Western Hemispheric State, Iranian Parliament has backed this decision order in 2007 arrested those dress wear police in Iran since of 2007, those enacting it by force against Judicial Orders with Regulations against the Citizens of Iran/Persia have been arrested since of 2007 till present, as a Radicalism Movement against the State Interests, endangering the Citizens Freedom of Choice, Lives and enacting hardship. +Fast responses I wondering. Why is it that you respond very fast on talk pages and edits you disagree with?. Is this because you put most page you are intrested in on your watchlist?. +OK, I've semiprotected the page. I hope that all parties will make more extensive use of the talk page. Seeing the reasons for the changes would make it easier to see which edits are in good faith. +I agree with Baseball Bugs on this one. This guy is being a real jerk. +" Hey First, it's between me and idiot, so please don't get involved, ok? I had added information to the Snopes article that I not only verified but then provided information on the talk page on how to do so. Instead of checking the talk page though, lazy idiot just hits revert and goes back to eating chips off his/her chest. Unfortunately that seems to be all too common around here - I've read countless ""bitching sessions"" posted by other people added constructive and meaningful information, only to have some lazy jerk remove it on a whim without even bothering to see what it was. 99.139.224.87 " +" Views on non-Muslims I'm adding some of Khoimeini's views on non-Muslims. It's well-sourced and should not be removed. If you want to make the section more neutral feel free to add some positive things he has said about non-Muslims (from credible sources of course). Talk " +Andrew Nellis article The Andrew Nellis was unfairly deleted according to the rules of Wikipedia. The rules require consensus. There was a majority but no consensus. What gives? This page should be put back up immediately. +Doctor Steel Were you the one who protected all the Doctor Steel pages? If so, it wasn't necessary. Either way, it wasn't a breach of fair use by any means. +I cannot tell what the trail might be, the fork is turned and it is difficult to guess where the steering axis might intersect the ground, relative to the front wheel contact point. However, the angle of the steering axis, which in motorcycles, is called the rake and is measured counter-clock-wise from the vertical when viewed from the right side, appears to be quite a bit more than usual. It might be as much as 45° instead of the 23.7° (with 3.8 in of trail) listed for a 2007 Honda CBR® 600RR, or the 29° (with 4.5 in of trail) listed for a 2008 Harley FXD Dyna® Super Glide®. - +The Naval Strategist Zhou Yu Although he had none of Zhuge Liang's strategy plans or his deft eloquence, Zhou Yu is still worthy of being called a strategist any day. At the battle of Chi Bi, he tried he best to out wit Zhuge Liang as best he could, but failed at each turn. Nevertheless, Zhou Yu had won a great battle for the South Lands. Even though Zhou Yu was jealous of Zhuge Liang, he was only trying to do his best. He saw the Shu strategist as a great threat to Wu in the future and he was right at the end of his days. If anyone hasn't read the novel, please do so and you see why Zhou Yu deserves tribute for his capabilities. +" March 2006 (UTC) Or we could just call you another Mooreon idiot whose excuse for every deception of Moore's is ""But Bush tells lies tooooo!"" Tattling on another kid didn't get you out of trouble in grade school, dumbass, it won't do anything for you here. - 09:26, 19" +" If you wish to contribute to the debate about the Laugh Factory Incident, please first read the long discussion about this which reached a consensus and can be found at Talk:Michael_Richards/Archive_2. " +"""In fact BJJ despised wrestling up until the UFC."" This is not true. Rolls Gracie (son of Carlos, brother of Carlson, Carlinhos and Rilion), one of the first BJJ phenoms, cross trained in wrestling (luta-livre and greco) and incorporated it in his teachings, in the late 70's. Black belt students under him were Mauríçio Motta Gomes (Roger Gracie's father) and Jacaré Cavalcanti (the founder of Alliance BJJ). " +Imran Khan Your edit to Imran Khan (actor) has been reverted as it is unconstructive. +Nice try. Aren't slurs against the rules? Isn't defamation against the rules? Jpgordon: You have absolutely no fact to back-up your slurs, so screw you. You're an immature little crybaby. You and the TAG-TEAM are the true fellow travellers of Supremacists, Revisionists, Deniers, Deletionists. Your actions have shown the world that. It's clear as day. Ha. Great job, Tag-Team, you are indeed an impressive exhibition of Supremacist groupthink. When's the next meeting? So now, which tag-team member is going to throw out the next slur, defamation and insult to people because they get angry? single-file please! You guys are pathetic. I see you for what you are, and it doesn't bother me one iota what you jewish supremacists think. You have to live in your skin. Wikipeida is an OPEN FORUM, get used to it. +" This article was nominated for deletion on November 30, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here." +Language note This is English-language encyclopedia. User pages are for communication between wikipedians. Please write in English. +Tony Sideaway, please see my comment up Userboxes DRV. I would like to know whats the priorities are. +Contact me! It has been a long time, but I miss you. Those private moments on the Bainbridge were special to me. You were my first. I only thought about women before you. How did we ever not get caught? But dont you remember that time we nearly were? Please email me, I know a few private clubs which I just know you would love!Email, please buddymcd@googlemail.com. Love Bud MacDonald +" That doesn't mean your actual contributions were worthwhile. A bad contribution can be salvaged, but it's still a bad contribution. You may have started over a thousand articles, but most of those were still vague, useless stubs that other people had to edit before they were worth keeping. The fact that you still do this here and other places baffles me - you say ""experience"", but most experience tends to lead to doing things better. Even more baffling is the fact that some of the stubs you create are about subjects on which you have shown an almost singular focus, such as the Unification Church. It's like leaving dirty laundry around to remind someone else to wash it. Maybe you could help your case by showing us how many things are on your ""deleted contributions"" list? 76.105.223.232 " +. Only paranoid conspiracy theorists believe in that I'm afraid. +How is not justificable to include the emergency hotline number? It is defined as knowledge and is needed by friends and family of potential victims in Innisfail. I should note that for sometime the Hurricane Katrina Page did in fact feature an American emergency number for a short while. +Holdout The guy's on a holdout right now. Even though he's restricted, he's supposed to be a FA also. Shouldn't that be reflected somewhere in the article? +Thanks again and I understand. As soon as I get the picture (s) and the info you describe I will follow your direction above. The pictures are very graffic especially compared to the one shown in the article plus what I have read about some of the graffic pictures that were in discussion about crohn's disease, I will probably do the latter part so others can see them first to make sure they aren't too graffic for the normal person to access. Thanks, +" Again, saying that the logic one's using is racist is much different than calling a person themself a racist. I have been as clear as I possibly can about that, so I will not apologize, nor will I make any adjustments to my stances. If you feel personally offended, then, as I've said, that's for you to deal with. I've said in no uncertain terms that I'm here to get the truth out there and I'm completely indifferent to what anyone's personal feelings are about me. Therefore, your threat of pulling ""rank"" means nothing to me I have done nothing outside of the standards of wikipedia (although if any of my dealings with the wikipedia staff in the past are any indication, I wouldn't exactly expect them to be objective either). But like I said, do whatever you want. I'm not gonna lose sleep over being put out of some online ""clubhouse"" (if it were to come to that) " +Its fucking assholes like you who vandalize wikipedia that really grind my gears. Where the fuck do you get off? Huh? Huh? You think this is funny don't you? Well I sacrificed a career and a marriage to keep unconstructive pigs like you from ruining a good thing like Wikipedia; and if I ever get to see my kids again I know they'll thank me for this. You sir are a prick. And what kind of fucking name is 99.135.144.18 anyway? Oh and your user page sucks noob. 24.61.195.2 P.S. You personally, and not your ip are forever banned from Wikipedia +Well, Tangobot and SQLBot have both been keeping track of the RFA stats for quite a while; those are updated at least every hour, I think. what format do you need the stats in? Did your bot do something substantially different than those do, that stops you from using their data? +" simple reading of the Act would explain: -An Act to provide a national Currency, secured by a Pledge of United States Stocks, and to provide for the Circulation and Redemption thereof. Sec. 15. And be it further enacted, That every association, after having complied with the provisions of this act preliminary to the commencement of banking business under its provisions, shall transfer and deliver to the Treasurer of the United States any United States bonds bearing interest to an amount not less than one third of the capital stock paid in; which __bonds shall be deposited with the Treasurer of the United States__, and by him safely kept in his office until the same shall be otherwise disposed of, in pursuance of the provisions of this act. Section 16. And be it further enacted, That upon the making of any such transfer and delivery, the association making the same shall be entitled to receive from the Comptroller of the Currency circulating notes of different denominations, in blank, registered and countersigned as hereinafter provided, equal in amount to __ninety per centum of the current market value of the United States bonds__ so transferred and delivered, but not exceeding the par value thereof, if bearing interest at the rate of six per centum, or of equivalent United States bonds bearing a less rate of interest; and at no time shall the total amount of such notes, issued to any such association, exceed the amount at such time actually paid in of its capital stock. Sec. 41. And be it further enacted, That every such association shall at all times __have on hand, in lawful money of the United States__, an amount equal to at least twenty-five per centum of the aggregate amount of its outstanding notes of circulation and its deposits; ""lawful money"" ie. United States notes, commonly reffered to as ""greenbacks""" +Your removal follows your own point-of-view however. Your replacement is not cited, and appears to be essentially your own opinion. So I've restored what Lutyens said. +To include then, what was attacked by the initial air strikes, we must mention that it was a police academy or whatever...if not, then the initial attack was just that, a surprise initial attack on Gaza. +You can do what you want, there are some neutral users and mediators will come to handle your POV. '''''' | (t) +LOL! You whine like a child. Can't take criticism, so you whine to ANI. You DO realize IP addresses are easy to come by, and your silly bans are worthless, right? +" Split infinitives I just wondered what you thought about split infinitives, with an adverb between ""to"" and the simple form of the verb. I don't like them. " +Eureqa What was I doing? Very simple, just creating a stub to start working on. I did not realize anyone would even notice the article existed at this early stage, so I thought I had some time to copy edit it into new prose so it wasn't a word for word copy, and begin building up a new article with references and perhaps pictures. If there is a problem I'll try to copy edit it In the next hour, and add some references in case there is any doubt as to notability. Best, Judgesurreal777 +There are only 2 references to the DJ, one of them as disambiguation at the very top of the article. The other is in the Parodies/References section, which is unnecessarily large. I highly doubt that a passing reference in The Simpsons, or the fandom of characters in TV shows and novels, qualifies as notable. Only a handful of references (if that many) belong here, and I'll be happy to pare it down soon. +Make the changes but also be sure that whole article make sense. Instead of only deleting the content, try to add something from your experience. Maybe you have some photos to share with us. - +" Hi. I'm not at all fussed whether the building and the bridge appear in the lead; I can certainly see both sides, but this is Charles' article, so I'm happy to let him decide. I only moved your addition because it went against the recommendations of WP:LEAD; because the lead is intended as a summary of the entire article, it shouldn't contain information not in the article body. I also felt that how locals now feel about the aesthetics of a building merely named after Minton was too trivial a point to make in a summary of what seems to have been a busy life. However, I hope you aren't put off editing the article because of my tweaks to your contributions; you've added some good and useful content. All the best,  T • C " +" "".. a thing called the jitterbug. Jitterbugging around, trying to surround enemy units with helicopters, and it worked pretty well.""" +Looks like there are two premier pages. See Premier (automobile). Are these the same? +" Sir, a corporation is, at least to the Wikipedia-article about it, a ""legal person which, while being composed of natural persons, exists completely separately from them"". I think this company is most certainly a corporation, but if it is not, I apology for my nonchalant wording. I will now change this page into a disambiguation." +, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Not all Gedolim opposed the disengagement. Did you ask for the opinions of chassidishe poskim? Satmar, Dushinsky, Bobov, etc? And those who did oppose it did so primarily out of humanitarian concerns, because it is horrible for 10.000 Jews to be thrown out of their houses. It was not because they agreed with the Zionist ideology. | (talk) 09:20 +Mandingo fighting- historical accuracy section I don't understand this, I've read the same review in a number of places which suggests slaves weren't organised to fight each other (from one professor's comment that they never heard of it). Yet information about the fighter Tom Molineaux suggests this did happen. It seems a clear contradiction. I can understand if there was absolutely nothing to suggest it ever happened (which still wouldn't mean it didn't), but there is an example of it happening. There are a number of news articles stating that Molineaux won his freedom through fighting other slaves. 137.111.13.200 +Hello, many thanks for the note. It works for me (too slow IMHO, but it works!). Many thanks to all of you. Dferg (w:en: - w:es:) +" Another one + Recent AfD nominations of beautycontestants by The BannerArticleNominatorStatus (as of Sept 14)Anastasia Chernova5 keep 0 deleteSheillah Molelekwa1 keep 0 deleteAdrienne MurphyKeepTsakana Nkandih1 keep 1 deleteCeleste Marshall1 keep 1 deleteWinfrida Dominic1 keep 1 deleteCamila Vezzoso2 keep 1 deleteFarah Eslaquit3 keep 2 deleteAndrea Radonjić2 keep 1 deleteAyako Hara4 keep 1 deleteZhana YanevaThe BannerKeepMarie-Noëlle Ada0 keep 0 deleteLaura Godoy2 keep 0 deleteSara ChafakKeepLindsay Japal1 keep 1 deleteAbigail HyndmanKeepYéssica Mouton1 keep 1 delete 1 redirectLaura Beyne2 keep 1 deleteMarcelina Vahekeni3 keep 1 delete 1 redirect (mostly copied from deletion page on Farah Eslaquit.) Wikipedia requires reasonable steps to search for reliable sources before nominating articles for deletion. It appears as if you, , have not been doing this. It appears as if you have been rapid-fire AfDing numerous articles (see chart). As of +The obvious subterfuge of this offer demonstrates that the message of the text was perceived to be a grave threat. Make no mistake, it was designed to be. Your 3RR threat is meaningless and I couldn't care less. +You seem to be making some sort of an existentialist argument and I'm not a trained philosopher. +will object to the name ... +" 2007 (UTC) Hi. It's just always kind of been common knowledge that this was a fake live album; e.g., the band has dropped hints about it in interviews, etc. I don't really have any way of proving it. But if you listen closely to the album, you can indeed hear loops of ""audience noise"" being repeated at set intervals. 05:59, 3 May" +I was wondering the same thing. +Review those cites and see how many of them are based on Tweets sent by Cory Booker. Maybe they happened, maybe they did not. But they are not wikipedia-worthy citations. 209.162.18.52 +" Top 40 Here's the list of the people who were SHOWN on the show. 1. Indiggo 2. Kaitlyn Maher 3. Jonathan Burkin 4. Derrick Barry 5. Neal Boyd 6. The DC Cowboys 7. Joseph Hall 8. Beyond Belief Dance Company 9. Paul Salos 10. George ""the Giant"" McArthur 11. Jessica Price 12. Elite 13. Flambeaux 14. Dorae Saunders 15. Bryan Cheatham 16. Zooperstars 17. Queen Emily 18. The Tapping Dads 19. Daniel Jens 20. Michael Strelo Smith 21. Shequida Hall 22. The James Gang 23. Jonathan Arons 24. Sick Step 25. Bruce Block 26. Sarah Lenore 27. Dallas Desperados Dancers 28. Plastic Musik (Pretty sure it's them, Not the Cadence) 29. Slippery Kittens 30. Nuttin' But Stringz 31. Extreme Dance FX 32. Shimshi 33. The Taubl Family 34. Matthew Piazzi 35. Eli Mattson 36. Ronny B 37. Texas State Strutters 38. Wild Card Act 39. 3 Children, One playing a double bass? 40. ???? One act is going to be added for the injury to the russian bar trio. That is listed as the wild card act and the people up for it are at the bottom of the eliminated list. There's a never before seen act with three children (yodeling?) and one of them playing the double bass. Maybe I missed something. Other than that, only 1 act is missing and all of the televised dismissials are accounted for (except for the older gentleman keyboardist.) " +" Possible COI Hello Diane Mantzaris, I saw your request at WP:PERM/C and wanted to give you a bit of a heads up on Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy. This does not mean you can not correct errors in Diane Mantzaris, you can always place an template on the article's talk page with the information about the changes you would like to make. You may also find other solutions at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Cheers, " +Sidna Ali Thank you for linking to the Sidna Ali Mosque. I didn't understand it until now. Thank you! +Is there something personal. Is there something personal you have against me to revive the old Ottoman Armenian picture?, I'm willing to go back to the article and have another round of discussion the image if this is your plan? The issue was resolved long ago +The humiliation and emotional abuse probably resulted in something, but a boy wearing dresses does not, itself, breed mental issues. Of course. +Talk:James_I_of_England#Category:LGBT_royalty Replied. 24.255.11.149 +" Hayley Westenra Vegetarian , Upon your edit summary: 'actually she isn't any more see the article Hayley Westenra in charge of her career which is sourced in the article.' And as I said on your Send me the link because I have 3, but if you have a valid current link please show me†♥ You have not provided links or any other information. The links I have that states otherwise: http://www.richardogdenmanagement.com/pages/richard_biog.htm http://www.hayley-westenra-international.com/dhtml-pages/html-2004/reviews/20040528_ClassicalBritAwardsRM.htm http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3404/features/4453/wish_upon_a_star.html;jsessionid=061201BB4F1D8677DFF9651A7A216EC8 http://www.goveg.com/feat/sexiestveg2007/ I will revert your edit unless you can provided other wise reason to have reverted mine†♥ " +Many other amateur erotic sites with less popularity are listed on Wiki: Abbywinters.com Adult Film Database Adult FriendFinder Adult Web Movie Database Alt.sex.stories Asian Sex Gazette Babeland Bang Bros Bang Bus Beautiful Agony Beaver Hunt Big Sister (brothel) Carstuckgirls.com MET ART MILF Hunter Masktv Mattsmodels.com Porn 2.0 Porn bot PornoTube Privatevoyeur.com Projectvoyeur.com PureTnA Sensible Erection Sex.com Stile Project Peter Stringfellow SuicideGirls Swank and more +Yes, I'm aware of that too ) I'll let you get on with your work now, and I need to try and finish this category before bedtime (soon!) +why do u delete my page??? i have written on the bumblebeez page and it is true i have not lied or broken any rules,please put it back to normal. +mw:Extension:SecurePoll|SecurePoll]] for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. For the Arbitration Committee, +12/25/2008: The Sleeping Doll, Jeffery Deaver +"::: Sorry for assuming. I just thought you were one, based on your productivity. And I've learned how to request blocks properly now, but thanks for your consideration. Triple M " +You should be humbled that you even have rights, let alone a month. Drop the arrogance and get back to the plantation. +edits to Jimbo's user page User:Jimbo Wales is not your sock puppet, and please do not go around like an April Fool. Thank you +May 2006 (UTC) My response to simply argued that the assertion about Haredi Jews was in need of citations and perhaps consensus. (I note that the assertion was recently removed so it seems to have been settled.)  ÷ talk 18:03, 16 +" Nope, not at all, thanks for the condescending attitude though. What I might have missed was what Nick said, gas canisters for propane tanks, which so far as I'm concerned is perfectly legitimate misunderstanding. That said, most propane tanks gas cylinders have releases to allow for safe de-pressurization when they are under heat or contents under pressure. So in that way, this still calls into question whether this should really be called a ""bomb"". " +" Graffity and verbal insults are no ""attacks"" (attack is war terminology), incident is a general term and most importantly, if someone reads the text, he can judge for himself how he classifies the events. " +Work IP I'd just like to point out that this IP is that of a workplace, therefore many different people may use this at any given time. Assyrian People +OTRS comment Not sure if you were aware of it or not, but we have the template specifically for this purpose. +"K, thanks for the tip. I did sign. ""Kombinator the great"". " +" _______________________Two years later_____________________________ As ever, stupidity prevailed in this case, with User:Rettetast saying that image was ""not vital to the article. Contains no information that can not be replaced with text or a free image"" ...and removing Image:The Original Ensamble Gurrufío.jpg from the text and making the file an orphan (and subsequently getting deleted). Also, to say that an image ""has no information"" was sheer foolishness. Go ahead, just try write a text and describe all the information a photograph has of a 2-year old toddler, for example! Besides, that image had been uploaded WITH PERMISSION. Go ahead, keep deleting & destroying, make this encyclopedia a text-only one, if that makes you happy. " +WHY ARE THEY BLOCKING ME? JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO IN LIFE. WHAT DID I DO WRONG? I ASKED WHY THEY WERE BLOCKING ME AND SEE ABVOE< THEY HAVE NO ANSWER. Shows what wikipedia is all about. +In general, I'm sick of your obnoxious excuses and immature piling-up. This will be all. — | talk +" Modern Martial Arts Schools Anshu Krista Jacobson is not in the US Hall of Fame, not under her current name or her birth name, Christopher Brooks. Her ""proof"" to Sokeship has also been invalidated along with her Martial Arts Titles and Training. http://www.unitedstatesmartialartshalloffame.com/index.html" +" AfD nomination of Phil Cassidy (Grand Theft Auto) An article that you have been involved in editing, Phil Cassidy (Grand Theft Auto), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Cassidy (Grand Theft Auto). Thank you. '''''' Talk/Contributions " +" Yes, he was given an amnesty, but it is still a fact that he was convicted. Probably the most balanced presentation is to mention both facts together: I accept that giving prominence to the conviction in the lead, while hiding the amnesty further down was unbalanced coverage, but so is hiding the fact of his conviction in the ""small print"". " +update it never gets updated an it wont let me +Thank you, my robot friend, but in this case you are mistaken. +" Ethnic Composition re: person who replaced ""white"" w/ ""European American"" and ""black"" w/ ""African American"" I reversed the changes so that the lahs page reflects the wording of the source material. If you feel really strongly about it then we can talk about how to reconcile the wording of the source with what is an arguably more politically correct wording." +Yawn. Let's hope the arbitration can decide on a better solution for this page. +I've provided a picture of Mr. Poor's distant cousin. +" A false claim that is created by ""just"" removing important information is still a false claim. UDF is part if the DVD and BD standard but unsupported by libburnia. " +I was one of the lost boys from sudan, when just came to American I see a lot changes in my life, beacuse I get the education free and work. I know life is hard but you can not run of of life. by stephen kong. +fuck you bitch. and fuck you lousy and misleading wikipedia:chemtrail page +" Note that shortly after this, removed the tag from Otho Prior-Palmer, and was blocked from editing by due to questionable use of the Newpageswatcher tool. I do not know what was driving him to tag plainly notable subjects for ""not asserting notability"", and regret that due to the block he has not explained it. " +J Freeman J Freeman is an oppressor and a violent person. He may also soon come out of the closet. +Requested move Tomislav Brkic → – There was no consensus regarding the use of diacritics, so this article should use the diacritics until a consensus is reached. See also: Talk:Mate Pavić. Talk, +" Feel free to report me as ""abusive"". — talk .com " +i disagree but whatever +LordyK, (man) you do need to chill out.. have just re-read this page and you're one angry bunny.Can't you see she's rattling your cage and you're falling for it. Just prove your worth by adding in the good stuff you're doing.and El, put the stick down please. You ain't adding to your credibility by constantly rattling peoples bars. Lordy's not vandalising and (he) easily knows his stuff. So work together folks and let the great wiki live in peace, Thanks all. ;-) +":: Well said. And to the ""debunker"" above: what is Zeitgeist? Sorry, I've researched this subject for over 20 years. Just because something is not commonly known today does not mean it did not happen. It was common knowledge throughout the 18th & 19th Century that the Rothschild family owned most of everything - so much so in fact that it was known as the Age of the Rothschilds among historians. Try doing some independent research all of your own and you'll soon see that the ""conspiracy theories"" about the BoE being privately owned are in fact rooted in historical fact - history which was not so long ago common knowledge. I could give you a list of reading matter to educate yourself but why bother? Your mind is already closed to anything which does not come from an establisment mouthpiece. For your edification: the ""nationalisation"" of " +USER TALK: Trevshaff123 hey, you guys blocked my IP school adress sorry bout my friends doing that if u could please unblcok us that would be nice -Thanks- +or American http://www.voanews.com/content/european-union-ukraine-summit-april/2698313.html +" Sockpuppetry case Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Go leafs go 3000 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. " +" THF I have not perused Wikipedia lately, but when I did, I saw some cooler (and sane) heads have seemingly prevailed, including yours. THF was the first AEI director I had the misfortune to encounter. When he saw my edits, which he didn't like, he came after me with a vengeance, and lobbied for me to be banned on Wikipedia. He defamed me on his talk site (yes, I am aware of the meaning of the word, since I also am an attorney). It was defamation - libel, to be exact - and removed after a time, when I threatened suit. I know Wiki doesn't like that - but it reaps what it sows. THF threatened me and my husband with frivolous litigation OUTSIDE of Wikipedia, and we called him on it. We never heard from him again. At that time, Wiki cliques would not or could not listen to what I had to say, and what had occurred. I have no idea if I am ""banned"" or not, and don't care at this point. After the Kafkaesque experience, I never want to edit again here. That said, I am grateful that you and it appears some others were able to expose him for what he is - even if it took a different issue entirely. (I had no particular interest in the Michael Moore debate). The AEI is one of the most powerful political influences in the Republican party. THF was quite an eye-opener for me. Rarely have I ever seen anyone so ruthlessly disparage others, with false ""information"". I can only guess what he does ""professionally"". THF is a public figure. His attempt to hide out at Wikipedia claiming it was only a ""hobby"" was laughable. It was astonishing that anyone fell for it, but many did. Good for you for calling him on it. Maybe there is hope for Wikipedia, but I'm not holding my breath." +Redvers Redvers has been harassing and stalking me. +" 1. You just completely misquoted me. Perhaps you should focus on your reading abilities before attempting to act so condescending. 2. The 'official source' does not give a listed height of 6'5"", whereas dozens and dozens of others list him as between 6'2"" and 6'3"" 3. Look at him and David Beckham. Is there really a six inch different in height? Use your brain, or common sense." +It's explained on the anorexia nervosa talk page either you misquoted it or just let a blatant error sit there for months Either way the article sucks. When I get the chance I'm going to rewrite the entire thing and post it all in one shot. +"Loathing is an appropriate response to a rape scene. The American audience is too used to seeing rape exploited simply as a plot point in an entertainment, so it's refreshingif disturbingto see a rape scene portrayed as horrifically as it is in Showgirls. See ""I Spit on Your Grave"" for another example of a film that makes it abundantly clear that the rape scene is not intended for entertainment. As brutal as the rape scenes are in these movies, it's clear that both of them are anti-rape movies. So the scene has fulfilled its purpose. (Frankly, I'm a bit repulsed when someone suggests that the rape scene in Showgirls should somehow be softened.) " +Doesn't change the fact that the chemical is essentially the same whether in freebase or salt form. +Other Samples The list of samples has a few non-beatles samples that I'm sure weren't there before. I'm almost positive that they're not there, so unless someone proves otherwise, I'll delete them +"==Unofficial Saw forum== Thanks for your contributions, but seeing as it's irrelevant to the article, I'm going to have to remove it. Please understand that we have to remove these sorts of links. Anybody could create a page on GeoCities for example with one line of text saying ""saw4 pwnz!"" and link it here. Only official content is deemed relevant. Please refrain from adding the link (Saw IV Forums) again. Thank you,   Talk!! " +Source 2: -> go to Waffen-SS & Polizei -> go to SS-STURMBANNFÜHRER -> go to D-F -> scroll down to ENDRESS, Hans. +Yes, this the wrong picture. The first Coca-Cola bottles were Hutchinson bottles. +"Taivo, do you ever get anything right? == I noticed as a neutral observer your huge bias towards the 'Republic of Macedonia' throughout this whole page as well as the usual Greek brigade trying to defend their famous history now in the hands of a new owners. I have followed this whole case including the Arb where again you seem content to falsify history, this time claiming, 'the Gordian Knot was a greek mess solved by a Macedonian.' The Gordian Knot was not a Greek knot Taivo and I suggest you refer to the appropriate page on this encylopedia to understand why before misquoting history. Alexander the Great, a Greek in his own words unfortunately for your little example on the Arb page, solved the knot the same way Chris0 did, without a care and with the sword. It is offensive enough how bias you are on the whole issue while claiming neutrality (the only thing that really annoys me), at least Fut Perfect and Chris 0 are honest extreme nationalists to an extent. What exactly are you? It is sad in my view. This page has always been a battle ground, on the one hand, the usual Greeks editors tring to salvage their past for the world to remember them by, on the other the new fierce 'Macedonians' relying on neurtrals who do not fully understand the situation in the Balkans for support. This word Macedonia, clearly needs a disamiguation page as Michael Wood (historian) would argue as he believes, the Republic of Macedonia should not be confused with the word Macedonia, and Taivo, I feel with great assurance, he does know his history and politics on the matter. Thank you for your time and good luck with this nasty page of nationalism and invented meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.123.62.178 == " +but in this situation the article was written by a third party about another person. +" Dear Sir: Wikipedia's rules for ""protecting"" a page do not make a provision for using the tool on an editor's talk page, especially when the ""protect"" is used as an added punishment. One must wonder at the complete lack of moral fiber displayed when an administrator improperly utilizes a ""protect"" on an editor's talk page, after repeat after, said editor had been blocked from further editing. This violation of wikipedia's rules was further compounded by the administrator's failure to withdraw the ""protection"" for nearly 24 hours after the block itself was removed. In an attempt to cover up this ""error"" the same administrator added the comments that he was removing the block, when in fact, he was actually removing the ""protection."" This gives rise to the notion that administrators who violate wikipedia rules are immune to sanction by their peers. This safe harbor must give the vengeful administrator the feeling of great power. Sad, true, and very funny. PS Would you please ask administrators and editors who seek to enforce the laws of capitalization to at least spell the word correctly when they chastise the violator. " +Request As a member of the board of trustees, I ask that you remove all false, misleading, and libellous information contained on WikiPedia about me. I remind you that continuing to hold such information is libel and is illegal. I refer specifically to this webpage here: and additionally to talk pages and user pages for this IP address. All should be blanked in other to preserve the integrity of this service. Failure to do so would constitute a smear campaign by WikiPedia, and, whilst it was initiated by persons such as longhair it is WikiPedia, and hence you, who will be sued as a result of any damages that this causes. I strongly recommend for you to delete these lies and falsehoods. +Why I put the cleanup tag on this page This page has a lot of interesting information about CSUN, but it currently has too many first-level headings for what are essentially first-level section stubs at the moment. Most of the first-level headings need to be downgraded to second-level headings and grouped under high-level first-level leadings in the way that such information is usually grouped in most Wikipedia articles. Also, there needs to be more background information about the University in general, as opposed to just miscellaneous trivia. +" I'm not sure what point you are making, but the current camber thrust article doesn't even mention the ""rolling cone"" model, mostly for lack of reliable sources. As explained on that article talk page, neither ""Cossalter nor Pacejka mention the cone analogy, and Foale concedes at the top of page 2-24 that the actual corner radius described is considerably greater than the cone radius."" Thus, it is not mentioned here or in the bicycle and motorcycle dynamics article. - " +. the other editors you are defending are claiming ownership over the article and are agenda pushing and they attacked me in the first place. +"Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ( T | C ) " +That section has no substantiated claims and has unverifiable information which is forbidden to have on Wikipedia. No claims have ever been made about Starforce having to be removed via formatting the partition it is installed on because it can be removed via the official removal tool. Therefore I am putting the warning back up. +" Thanks, but I'll just add my 2 cents in when someone else gets sniped at. I just had one detail to add to that page, sourced it, and made my case. It'd be a 3rr issue for me to keep pushing it, but it certainly didn't need even a single reversion. — LlywelynII " +2:00, 4 February 2015 (PST) +I'll leave you to it. +Recent edits to sandstone articles Hi Guohouli, I've reverted you additions to various sandstone articles as they appear irrelevant to the topics covered and introduced promotional links as well as copying and pasting copyrighted material. +Someone Ban Me So My misery posting here is over I am trying hard as hell to be an A$$ to get banned. Make it permanent please. I can then get back to being productive. Well I am waiting. 172.56.11.104 +Your edits to Gyakuten Saiban Where did you hear that Capcom was considering localizing Gyakuten Saiban 3 based on Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Justice for All' performance? I would appreciate a source. - (talk) +bitcoin in a country. Embellishing the section with reality improves +I agree that it's totally biased. I agree that these people are abusing the children, but that kind of sentence would NEVER be put in a real encyclopedia as it's so BLATANTLY biased. Why the hell is this article still protected?64.230.84.232 +Re: :It's the Yankees. Stop it, Eddie. — You still seem hell-bent on not letting me edit with a username. You obviously don't want Me to edit, but then again, I asked to You to leave Me alone and You continue to be a pest. You deverve payback. +" The text before my edition is POV, wrong and historically incomprehensible. Put a cite required where you need references and I put references. Or tell me what is ""substantial unsourced changes"" and we can solve the problem if any. " +" I have proposed some of the latest pic's for IT Infrastructure and Economy in Kolkata Talk page have a look. Dear Wikipedian, As suggest by some of the senior wikipedian from Kolkata i.e your very dear friend . I'm proposing some of the latest pic's of major business centers of Kolkata i.e Technopolis, Wipro, DLF (IBM), Unitech Infospace, Hidco Bhawan and many more to come. Please have a look to these pic's in Kolkata Talk page. I'm sure some the pic's should be added on to Kolkata wiki page. All thought I'm thinkin of to start a new page in wiki for IT Infrastructure and Major Business centers running in #Saltlake City, Kolkata. I hope you and other senior wikipedians from Kolkata forum going to support me. Fell free to suggest me if you and me can added more to Kolkata wikis then I'll fell happy to contribute.. After all who want a silly fight, that too in a open forum like ""Wikipedia"".. Thanks " +You are using wikipedia as an proselytist media for catholicism. I will report you to Jimbo Wales. Your comments are NO neutral,and are very defamotories against evangelicals. According to you, PROVEN persecution by catholics must to be written only in politically correct -and previously aproved by Catholic League- terms?. And you think to delete the article on Holocaust,because it is no neutral toward nazis?. You don`t have time for reading sources and documents,but edit and delete articles linked to these same documents?. Tries to be serious,some people writing here are serious and mature people,no lazy teenagers as you. +Report I thought it fair to let you know that I have reported your attacks on me here. . +It's never been acknowledged by anybody that special sauce was thousand island dressing and it doesn't even taste the same anyway. I thought this article was supposed to be based on facts and not guesses. +The point is, you have no permission to use these pictures. There are not your work, they're taken from webpages. +Some titles change. This one changed to Like Stars on Earth. The majority of the film's audience in the English-speaking world found the movie since the name change. And that website hasn't been updated in four years. +There was one serious push for the Upper Peninsula becoming the state of Superior in the Michigan Legislature. The push was made by Dominic J. Jacobetti Sr. was was probably the most (in)famous Michigan politician ever; he served 40 years in the Michigan House of Representatives and died before term limits could move him out. Jacobetti pushed for U.P. statehood in the legislature, although polls conducted in Marquette and Ironwood suggested that Upper Peninsula residents did not want to become their own state. I did a fairly large research project on Jacobetti and a good portion of it was dedicated to his pushing the U.P. as the 51st state. I can add a bit about this later from my research paper which is well documented and backed by sources from the Northern Michigan University/Central Upper Peninsula Archives which contains a wealth of material about the subject. - An NMU PoliSci student +" Moral outrage Holy cow, is nobody morally outraged at what the Israelis perpetuated on this day? When I was growing up, my teachers all tried to tell me, ""oh the Arabs voluntarily left Israel..."" what a lie! - " +Joydeep Does that refer to penetration? +You, sir, are the greatest hero in American history. I salute you. +" A hint Here's a hint. If your textbooks in grade schools didn't claim Israel doesn't have a right to exist, if parents in your society weren't teaching their kids that blowing up my people is a wonderful thing that will get them 72 virgins, if your government didn't name streets after mass murderers, pay blood money to the parents of mass murderers, put them on camera hailing their kids as heroes, and if YOUR PEOPLE weren't spending their time and money on buying weapons and digging smuggling tunnels instead of fixing infrastructure, starting businesses, and building better lives, then there would be no need for checkpoints, no need for a big-ass wall, no need for anything of the sort. And you'd have your state. You'd have had it decades ago if your goal was to have a state. You could have been living freely, if the Arab states had accepted the offer, signed a nonagression pact, and let you come home instead of stuffing your parents inside ""refugee camps"" cynically turning you into shock troops and poster children for ""oh look what the Jews did to 'our people' when we stuffed them into refugee camps instead of taking the easy way to let them go home."" You could have had a Palestinian state in 1948. You could have had one at any time after that. But it's as you say. ""On the last day, even the rocks and the trees will shout 'O Muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him!"" Your goal isn't a Palestinian state. It's the death of my people and establishing a sharia state on top of their cooling bodies. I just cleaned up some of your ridiculous lies on one page. I'm not going to bother checking anywhere else - YET. That would be wikistalking." +also, i am aware of the debate about whether arab admiration of nazi ideology was because of antisemitism or as a means to counter british influence. i plan on adding information regarding this as well, researching sources now. +" Well, I used to avoid it, but I seem to be irresistably drawn to trying to resolve these brushfire wars. Hopefully, something satisfactory can come of this one. - (conspire | past ops) " +Protected edit request on 24 June 2015 DEEZ NUTZ +Email from you I received an email today stating you had left me a message. I went to my page, no message. Could you please let me know if you sent a message, or if you made an edit to my talk page? I don't want to continue this fight, if that's what it's all about. +April, 2007 Yes, that is much better. User:Daniel_Chiswick 14 +Matty, see Bidisha for more on this. Yout last point 'For what it's worth' is irrelevant. Thanks for your input, however. 82.41.251.96 +Cornell reference removed the article cited actually says nothing about the biomedical engineering department being famous for white elephants. +TRENT REZNOR So, the lead singer and basicaly the entire band is made up of Mr.Michael Trent Reznor. My role model. complete genius, if you ask me. i adore him and his music. with the emotion and the power his songs contain, i can relate to what hes saying and why he says what he sings. i am a female and i love him music. he has made me look at music in a n entirely different way and i love how he did a commericial for PeTA talking about animal rights, and how the politics in the US have him very concerned. This man is more than just a musician, hes a humanitarian, producer, owner of dogs, son, brother, and so much of a role model to me. - -Mel +see the 2nd photocopied page of +" Continuation of original AfC discussion Thank you for putting inline citation into the lead. Primary sources are discouraged by the guideline delineated on WP:MEDRS. The rational behind this is discussed in detail on that page. This policy is the result of a period of evolution after several years of community discussion. If you disagree with that policy, the correct place to raise your concerns would be on the talk page for the guideline. While that guideline stands however, please let me assure you that the primary sources need to be removed, and if possible replaced with reliable secondary and tertiary sources. If no replacement sources are available, then the content is not notable [yet] for wikipedia. This does not mean that the content is irrelevant on a wider stage (e.g. in scientific circles), but Wikipedia has guidelines for what is notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia entries. I include a brief sweep to move the discussion forwards below. Main issues appear to be 1. primary sources, 2. WP:MEDDATE, 3. otherwise unreliable sources 4. possible conflict of interest (?). Many thanks, (talk) Hirt M, Nobel S, Barron E (2000) Zinc nasal gel for the treatment of common cold symptoms: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ear Nose Throat J 79:778-82 primary source Mossad SB (2003) Effect of zincum gluconicum nasal gel on the duration and symptom severity of the common cold in otherwise healthy adults. QJM 96:35-43 primary source Pories WJ, et al. (1967) Acceleration of healing with zinc sulfate. Ann Surg 165:432-6 primary source, WP:MEDDATE issue Simkin PA (1976) Oral zinc sulphate in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2:539-42 primary source, MEDDATE issue Samman S, Roberts DC (1987) The effect of zinc supplements on plasma zinc and copper levels and the reported symptoms in healthy volunteers. Med J Aust 146:246-9 primary source, MEDDATE issue Forman WB, et al. (1990) Zinc abusean unsuspected cause of sideroblastic anemia. West J Med 152:190-2 Case report, MEDDATE issue Fiske DN, et al. (1994) Zinc-induced sideroblastic anemia: report of a case, review of the literature, and description of the hematologic syndrome. Am J Hematol. 46:147-50 Case report, MEDDATE issue Eby GA, Davis DR, Halcomb WW (1984) Reduction in duration of common cold by zinc gluconate lozenges in a double-blind study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 25:20-4 primary source, MEDDATE issue Godfrey JC (1988) Zinc for the common cold. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 32:605-6 although not a primary source, this is a bit old, and also it is a letter to the editor, it is better to use review papers. Eby GA (1988) Stability constants of zinc complexes affect common cold treatment results. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 32:606-7 as above Eby GA (2001) Elimination of efficacy by additives in zinc acetate lozenges for common colds. Clin Infect Dis 32:1520 this appears to be a comment on a previous primary source Prasad AS, et al. (2008) Duration and severity of symptoms and levels of plasma interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor, and adhesion molecules in patients with common cold treated with zinc acetate. J Infect Dis 197:795-802 primary source Farr BM, Gwaltney JM (1987) The problems of taste in placebo matching: an evaluation of zinc gluconate for the common cold. J Chronic Dis 40:875-9 MEDDATE issue Smith DS, et al. (1989) Failure of zinc gluconate in treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:646-8 primary source, MEDDATE issue http://coldcure.com/html/zinc-lozenges.html unreliable medical source, self published, promotional, unreferenced, no peer review ... definitely needs to be removed Jafek BW, Linschoten MR, Murrow BW (2004) Anosmia after intranasal zinc gluconate use. Am J Rhinol 18:137-41 case report Alexander TH, Davidson TM (2006) Intranasal zinc and anosmia: the zinc-induced anosmia syndrome. Laryngoscope 116:217-20 primary source Eby G (2012) The mouth-nose biologically closed electric circuit in zinc lozenge therapy of common colds as explanation of rapid therapeutic action. Expert Rev Respir Med 6:251-2 letter to the editor These souces are likely ok, not sure how others feel: Bakar NKA, Taylor DM, Williams DR (1999) The chemical speciation of zinc in human saliva: possible correlation with reduction of the symptoms of the common cold produced by zinc gluconate-containing lozenges. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability 11:95-101 '''apart from breaching MEDDATE, th +":::::::And what do you mean by ""my issue""? I attempted a single two-sentence edit to Jesus, and my supposedly disruptive discussion on Talk was about sourcing. " +" RfA Thanks Thank you for your participation in my RfA, which closed successfully with unanimous support. I appreciate you taking the time to stop by and vote and I can't wait to learn the new tools and further immerse myself into Wikipedia! Please don't hesitate to point out any errors I make so I can prevent them from occurring again. I'm always here to help, so if you ever need anything, just let me know. Also, thanks to for nominating me and for guiding many other editors to become admins. Again, thank you and happy editing! " +Excuse me, the information on wikipedia is judged on citable sources, and not necessarily the truth, as one sees it. And most certainly not truthiness. If the reliable source, or if any overwhelmingly number of reliable sources don't quite reflect one's perception of the truth, whatever that truth is, tough poop. +" I'm using the new Page Curation, I'm sorry that I marked them wrong but it did not fall under anything else that I could see. Talk " +It is an untrue statement. It was clearly promotional. More precise it should be. New editors should be given some latitude but when there is a clear attempt to deceive then that grace should be withdrawn. +Note to Gamaliel: The stated reason, that is, which is still a violation of WP:RPA. Seriously, have you even read these policies, or just the first headers? Note to admins: Another editor (neither me, a friend, or a sockpuppet) has also questioned the reasons behind this ban, over on the admins talk page. Further note to admins: Go read what added that made me react so poorly. I guess I am just anti-pro-pedophile like that. +" Unfortunately, the fairly short books appear confined to the noncirculating Virginia rooms of libraries. I'm starting to read them and correct the references, starting with the shortest (published by Virginia's Bicentennial Commission). Imogene E Brown's American Aristides"" A Biography of George Wythe was published by the Associated University Presses in 1981, and Joyce Blackburn's George Wythe of Williamsburg: America's Forgotten Founding Father by Harper and Row in 1975. Interestingly, the compilation of Wythe's opinions (noncirculating at the Library of Virginia) stopped in 1799, the year in which Virginia's slavery statutes became more onerous. " +recently u posted false information about Boise st footballs stadium it is illegal to say bsu football stadium has 36,000 for there stadium if u keep this up the sheriff will be in contact with u and your family I am a under cover cop who watches every move some one does on wiki I'm only giving u a warning next time u will be in some Sirius stuff k so don't post stuff kik tho again already have a nice day. +" Australia Retired Flavours It says in the Australia section that the rasberry flavour is retired. But at my local Hungry Jacks, you can have a Fanta Rasberry refill. I think some of the flavours are still available. -7 " +" One more question concerning your table: the ""locations"" are the location of the main subject(s), not of the viewpoint, correct? " +" The oppose votes did not account for the substantial evidence that the Aguilera song is primary. If you want to discuss it I'm available, but unilaterally moving it back is not an option. t/c Stop move warring or the page will be protected. Please continue the discussion; I've responded to your comment at my talk page. t/c It did account for it. The Oppose above mine did. If anything, the Pretty Ricky one should be the one which is not disambiguated because it was release in 2005, Aguilera's in 2012. Not having Aguilera's name appear in search results is not helpful. Oppose far outweighed support here, and you have no reason to overlook that.  —  • TALK " +never touch my edits again you douche bag +This entry is totally irrelevant i totally agree with W4 +John, there are over 2 million articles in this encyclopedia, and over 250,000 biographical articles. Is there a particular reason why you feel driven to have the last word on assessing this specific article? +" It wasn't too horrible but we are very sensitive here on Wikipedia. e (talk) (Clarify T1) " +Further, by the way, the second source that you cite www.pakpassion.net, is a cricketing site, and the note on Malik Ata given there is in fact culled from this existing Wikipedia article you CANNOT cite this page/article as a reference for itself, please! Thats highly dishonest. 39.54.10.247 Hilda Khan +Akshardham Delhi Environmental Violations Hello, If you have time would you please take a look at this article: and this discussion and provide your input. I feel fresh eyes and admin will bring proper clarity for this topic. Thank you +Haujobb-3.jpg I have tagged Image:Haujobb-3.jpg as . If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. tast +" STOP BEING AN IDIOT. It's not motherfucking speculation, and i'm not ""attacking"" anyone. Now shut the fuck up, because you are wrong. AND LEAKERS ARE RELIABLE!~ NOW PLEASE SHUT THE HELL UP! YOU ARE WRONG. END OF STORY!- " +You're Not Going To Destroy Wiki You said that wiki admins look down on people who repost deleted material. If that's true, then why do they allow people the option of appealing their reposts? Rather, the admins look down on those who cower from the truth. Consider that. I don't know who you think you are. You're in no position to dictate to others what they should or shouldn't do. I am in process of appealing this to the wiki admins about your constant and ignorant reluctance to accept the true histories of people WHICH YOU ARE AND NEVER WILL BE PART OF. Once again, you don't qualify to re-edit people's work. You're not European. You don't have an inkling about European history and therefore don't possess the authority to counter our history. You're not our people. Just stick to what you know best, which is Chilean culture, and leave European culture - which you know nothing about - out of your reach. +Andrew Snape Douglas Fabulous job expanding and cleaning this up! I just cobbled together something quickly from what I could find on the web, but now it looks great - you obviously have good references on-hand and know your stuff. +Done. This entry is lond, I'll see about chopping it up later. maveric149 +Where do you get off deleting that? it took me ages to do and you jus come and delete it, all the while leaving your shitty MTV bollox up, you fucking Americans are nothing but a bunch of fucking hicks. Your presidents a fucking redneck hick and I cant wait to see the day when that bastard gets a nuke up his arse!!! +" Your George Allen comments The Wikimedia software has some sort of a bug with regard to properly noticing ""edit conflicts"" on talk pages. Occasionally, someone's just-inserted comments get silently over-written by another user's just-inserted comments. " +General Suggestion: This article has poor printability as in MSIE as in Mozilla FFX and therefore should be redesigned. +I HAVE ALREADY LEARNT A LOT AND YOU KNOW NOTHING. +Nice editing job, but I notice that you removed the paragraph explaining that 'Cavendish' only makes up about 10% of world production, and that its 'extinction' would only affect world trade, not production for local consumption. Any particular reason? Assuming it's true, I think that this fact contributes a lot to the 'extinction' discussion, and would be worth reinstating. (Overall, the combination of the facts that bananas are such a huge crop and staple starch for so many people, and the fact that the viability of a leading variety is under threat, is quite alarming until you understand that the 'extinction' panic only relates to the export trade.) +Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at Tredegar Iron Works. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. (talk) +Where do you come from? +" Deletion of N-able I am fairly new to Wiki, so I apologize in advance, but I have been trying to build an N-able page. My goal is to provide some history into this organization, talk a little bit out its products. I am not trying to sell anything, or even promote anyone to going to the company website, I am simply trying to give users a common definition for this organization. The first time I posted this article, I made a critical error in that I set-up my user name as the title of the article (and for that, I apologize). I tried reposting, but was told that it was ""blatant advertising"". I took out as much of the offending text as possible, but now it is permanently deleted because I have tried to post several times. Is there anything I can do to fix this article? My ultimate goal is to help define the term Managed services and help provide some information as to the founding organization that have shaped this new business and social phenomenon. Thanking you in advance " +" Thank you for your concern, but I am editing the page to add content to the page, ozurbanmusic is removing my edit, so it is ozurbanmusic's fault. You go look at his talk page, there is lots of people saying to him about how bad his ""fixing"" is." +I gave more than one reason (i.e. bad quality image and we already her sitting with Obama and family in the women section). We need to avoid trying to make her the Queen of 50 million Pashtun people as that will turn this well-written encyclopedia article into someone's blog page. Just so you know me, I think like a judge sitting inside a court room, I review everything before I take action. I don't favor someone because of their looks or being famous in the news, I look to see what that person has accomplished. +" File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg to appear as POTD soon Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 10, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-06-10. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. ) Thanks! '''''' {chat} " +Actually I am disappointed seeing misuse of Kamrupi. - Thanks matter +Poor Wolfy you are so deluded. You have never added anything of any use to the PD article. You don't even know basics. You're not a specialist. You're just a GP with all the ignorance that involves. You plainly don't keep up to date with PD because you keep on proving how dated your knowledge of it is. You keep on referring to some basic medical text. If it isn't in that book it isn't true according to you. I've read over 80 books on Parkinson's Disease. Even that isn't 5% of what I know. I spent over three years just on its biochemistry. What you know about PD biochemistry you could LITERALLY write on the back of a matchbox. As you have nothing useful to add you just revert everybody. You plainly suffer from intolerance, ignorance, conservatism and obsessions. You're detrimental to WP. So for good measure I've reverting dozens of your old edits - the ones you no longer check - just taking out the bits you added - all using different names of course. +Sure, but all of the sources are subject to scrutiny and contextualization. If the only support that CW can muster are a holocaust denier, on of its own editors and a person who has barely taken a cursory look at the issue - than criticism section should be left unbalanced. I remain unconvinced. +"Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. 1999a |  Talk  " +" I have repeatedly attempted to communicate with Wikipedia with a simple request. Virtually all attempts have been blocked. I am not appealing for arbitration. My contributions were deemed to be ""original research"", the accusation was made that I had never given a valid citation to support them. I repeatedly posted the citation, even going so far as to quote the text. This was rejected by an editor repeatedly as being without merit despite my requests that said editor at least check the citation. Every time the only reply of the editor was that I had given NO citation. I have no problem if the Wikipedia would rather accept a charge that a citation was never given even if the citation - in fact the total quotation of the source material, as used in the citation - was submitted three times. This is the judgement of Wikipedia. My request is very simple. As I stand accused of ""original research"" for repeating in toto the source material (a short telegram) which was likewise published in toto in what was by every standard a legitimate source for the Wikipedia. And as I stand accused of repeated - and admittedly passionate - pleadings for the editor to check the citation, and stand accused for doing so, then all I want is to terminate my account and removed those contributions to the Wikipedia I have made. If my scholarship is not worthy of the Wikipedia then why would you want to keep it? If my defense of my scholarship by portraying the activities of a person who refused it, despite the fact that it was printed in toto in a legitimate source, as ""original scholarship"" as ""obstreperous,"" then all I can say is that my application of the word is within it's dictionary definition. I am not asking that the block on editing be removed. I am not asking for some ""vindication.'I am asking for no consequence to anyone. I am simply asking the Wikipedia to carryout what it must if my work is without merit because I have never cited any valid references for my edits. If my work is worthless, without merit and ""original research,"" then the Wikipedia by it's own standards MUST remove it. If the Wikipedia will not do this then what can I do but try to enforce the actions and stated standards of Wikipedia by taking you to court. I would rather not see that. Have a nice one! Mark D. Lincoln" +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jupiter. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. – Gurch " +Thanks Not sure where to put this comment so if this is inappropriate just remove it. Thank you for taking the time to review the Top Ryde City entry. It was both generous with your time and even handed. Unfortunately I got into trouble because I was not fully aware of the rules and I will make more effort to be a better editor in the future. If I understand correctly you are now an admin ... apparently well deserved. 110.174.23.139 +Some places have 6 seasons!!! +To thus of us who lived through that time, it seemed perfectly reasonable, and no evidence has emerged to undercut that situation. +(See Voiceless uvular fricative) +Irish name addressed by WP:IMOS, two WP:IMOS dose not exclude there use. +Will try - maybe if you put things here first, we can translate/improve the text. +The prosecutor's office has denied the Netherlands 20,03,15 fact that shot down Buk Then it was announced a refutationhttp://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/http://news.tut.by/world/440558.htmlhttp://www.utro.ua/ru/proisshestviya/niderlandy_oprovergayut_soobshcheniya_smi_o_buke_sbivshem_boing1426845624 Media again all said lies. Netherlands officially denied media reports.http://ren.tv/novosti/2015-03-20/niderlandy-oprovergli-soobshcheniya-o-tom-chto-malaziyskiy-boing-byl-sbit-iz-zrkhttp://de.sputniknews.com/panorama/20150319/301569342.html +He still won't follow. He has a very high regard of himself. He will take only his facts into consideration. He deleted my kindest dispute on his talk page. I would at least expected a reply not a post deletion. +" Look at the list. It's two completely different things. That poseur list essentially is ""not real"" emo bands. And I would have just merged mine into that one, but the problem is that article has a dictator that only allows the most absurd of edits to pass. He thinks a community college newspaper is a credible source, and clings to a site like allmusic.com that is notorious for errors. When you call him out on anything like that, he ignores it and runs away. He doesn't even respond on the talk page when you want to discuss the addition or deletion of a band. You can never get anything done with him around. Those dispute resolution procedures won't do crap. He was banned for a day too and weasled his way out of it. I've never had a problem with anyone else on here. I'm not the only one that sees his self-imposed dictatorship on certain topics. My solution to avoiding him was making new articles and ignoring his. The articles I created were done no differently from the countless articles already on this site. He purposely went after them because I made them. How is it my fault when you have someone that controls all the edits of an article and then doesn't let anyone else make their own as well? He's trying to run things here. " +) 16:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC +Shugdenpas are systematically attacking Thought to let you know and alert others to Shugdenpas' organized sectarian marketing campaign on Rime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rime_movement http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rime_movement&action;=history +As stated above: I hold my promise though mr. W.Waggel and mrs. M.Moira vandalised by reverting from mr. E.Baas onwards continuously my very relevant Scientific reference translated. Not including the ex-link to the jnllabs anymore. Regards: D.A. Borgdorff PEng MIEE FIREN = 86.83.155.44 +Catherine Anderson Hi Ericvpharm, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you re-added information to Catherine Anderson, and I thought that since you are a new contributor you may not be very familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. As currently written, the paragraphs on her future works are unsourced, which means they violate wikipedia's policy on verification, it is presented in a way that is not neutral (violating the [[WP:POV|neutral point of view policy), and it reads like advertising. I would like to take those paragraphs out again so that the article will properly reflect Wikipedia's policies. Do you have any objections? +Some information on section Windows is incorrect! Some information on section Windows is incorrect! Someone might help to correct! +" hmm ""It's an encyclopedia, not an experiment in democracy."" Apparently it is both." +" Speedy deletion of Dugald McAndrew A tag has been placed on Dugald McAndrew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. fisto " +" January 2011 and Shii (response to message left on his talk page) @Reaper Eternal: Because Shii has been consistantly and arrogantly abusing his power there at Wikipedia and deserves to be treated like everyone else. POD and Shiithead are extremely biased against Mardyks because he wants the truth about 2012 to be known and they have another agenda which Mardyks keeps calling them out on. Shiithead has made comments such as ""invoking Mardyks in a dark mirror and having your soul eaten"". Very abusive fellow for a claimed Buddhist and Wiki ad. Search the records. Star Heart" +"Highly objectionable content. This content is biased against the traditional cultures of Western Civilization and is downplaying the major roles the ""fairer skinned"" citizens of these nations have achieved and their important contributions to where we are now as a ""Global"" culture. Please do not inject socio cultural biases into this forum. I reject the whole premise of this page and find it very objectionable. I will not fund an organization such as the ""United Nations"" if they continue to erase Western Civilization from memory. We are not a perfect race but we have made some of the most important contributions to mankind and you and your politically correct elite cannot change or erase historical facts with your blind knee jerk western biases and label us as racists every time we try to have a debate. We have made many highly unappreciated corrections to our perceived ""racism"" but it was our tyrannical leaders that led us down this path and not the innocent citizens of these nations. And I do not appreciate you taking some of the most beautiful objects in the western world and overlaying ridiculous brain images on them. This is very, very offensive and if nobody else recongnizes it they are ignorant fools. And I reject out of hand the labels of ""Neo Nazi, White Supremacist"", and other ridiculous words you hateful people spew out of your unappreciative filthy mouths. You will not cow us into submission anymore with your ridiculous elitist ""theories"" generated in the dank backrooms of a useless anachonism called the United Nations. It is beyond the pale. A United Nations that had Kadaffi on the ""human rights"" council. You have no credibility and you are losing more and more of it -the miniscule amount that you have left - as the years go by. " +It's only proper I let Mongo speak for himself. Conspiracy theorists would have you believe it's related to something like or . +" I archived the previous discussion of this page to get rid of some clutter. It would be great to find a public-domain image of Hank Williams. Other images would help the article aesthetically also. And the Tributes section needs to be wikified (and perhaps moved to another article). Besides that, you're right. The article just nedds to be expanded, with in-line citations. I'm about to start a section about his ""childhood,"" which seems like a logical place to start. I'd say the childhood section should probably go up to the time at which Hank moved to Montgomery and started performing on air, so it's OK if anyone else wants to go ahead and start working on anything else. " +Re: Preview I do use it. Why do you ask? +When did Sam join the United States Air Force When (year) did Sam join the United States Air Force?.98.236.110.176 +" I found a reference for her role in the Order of Australia here: It's an Honour - This is the honour website for the Australian Government Quote: ""...the Governor-General is the Principal Companion and as Chancellor is charged with the administration of the Order. "" " +" Note to User:23prootie → No matter what you do, we will find all the sockpuppets you are editing under, one by one by one. And for each and every your attempt at POV-pushing here on this article page, be expected that it will be reverted and then ignored faster than you can claim your innocence. ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ List of sockpuppets of 23prootie ← BLOCKED INDEF~! ← BLOCKED INDEF~! ← BLOCKED INDEF~! ← Soon to be banned!" +Thank you very much. Interestingly, the articles came almoust at the same time, as the English one. I learned about the phenomenon in an English linguistic group and found similar words in German language. There seem to be much more such words in English than in German. Best regards - Bernd 12:55, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC) +Yes, definitely!!! It would be fine just to keep all the information in one place. my buzz +" 1 MB = 10^6 bytes. The ""mage"" you mention is Mebi (MiB)." +spent the worst 3 months of my life in this hell hole! +This IP address is from the Telefonica's proxy for the ADSL users on Spain. I don't know what your policies are, but maybe you find this fact usefull. +I also went through the television and presidential elections section to relate it more thoroughly to the complex, but I'm running out of time to do the rest. If everyone could do that with the other sections we'll be much better off. +" Observation only: article creation date 2007.- Sinneed " +What the %#@* is wrong with you? Calm down,or I'll report you to an admin!! +" Allow me to reiterate: whether the intro is ""clear"" or the structure ""logical"" shouldn't be the issues (and I don't think logic is on anyone's mind in this discussion). The issue should be whether the random person is going to come away more confused than before (i.e., *to whom* is the article clear (or not)?) If Jza84 reads it over and over, I suggest it will remain clear to her/him. On the other hand, the random person looking for answers about the administrative geography of the UK is likely to find it unclear for the reasons mentioned above. " +"==Your comments lately== Especially on the Science reference desk are bordering on being uncivil. Please read WP:CIVIL and consider this a warning about your behaviour. | talk Do not remove warnings. Also, since you told me to ""get stuffed"" after being warned, you are now blocked for 24 hours. Please use this time to cool down and think about your actions. | talk " +dude you both are dumb, in the heavier than heaven biography it says he started in the eighth grade and that age for him would have been 13. And another thing for Scarian, stop sending me stupid messages, because i obviosly am not listening to you. +EU colors Dear Bastin, thanks for cleaning up the SVG picture of the European Conservatives and Reformists. I am sure that you understand the formatting of SVG more than I do - it just happened that I learned how to fill things. ;-) But could you please distinguish the EU countries from the non-EU countries more visibly than by the very similar two levels of gray? I would disagree that your coloring is better in this respect. What about some kind of decent yellow for the EU? +" Edits Hello, thank you for letting me know about your changes, I briefly looked over the article I changed (technically changed back) and was unaware of any errors, The reason I made the changes was due to me looking at another article, and noticing the user named ""Lukeno94"" making an incorrect edit, so I found my way to his page of edits, and it seemed he was targeting a specific IP address and changing anything that person edited. I apologize if I made an error, I was simply trying to help out what looked like someone being bullied." +Vandalism, douching, and faggotry are not tolerated on this website. +Removed lie I have removed a lie inserted by a self-identified Palestinian Arab from this article. +"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk " +On 13 June 1916, Young was seconded from the Dorsetshires to the Royal Flying Corps as an aerial observer Flying Officer.(The London Gazette, 7 July 1916) http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/29656/pages/6746 Retrieved 1 May 2011. +" ""Immoral racism?""???! No, if you had actually read Myatt's The Numinious Way you would know that what Myatt is critical of Pierce and and his Cosmotheism is that it is ""immoral"" based upon ""an abstraction"" and NOT because Cosmotheism is ""immoral because it is racist"". Both of you need to get your facts straight before reverting other peoples factual edits. It is clear that the point being made is that Myatt has made a break from his past affiliations with his recent adoption of ""The Numinious Way"", of which and including his ""criticisms of Dr. Pierce and his Cosmotheism, really makes quite clear. I guess that any of these facts won't get in the way of your own biased POV vs a true NPOV for this article on David Myatt, or will it?" +" (UTC) I do think it's worth adding a criticism section. I actually won't let my kids watch it because the english (and spanish) is terrible, the manners are terrible, I think it's subtly racist (why does dora cross a river in every episode?), I think the fox is a subtle knock on jews and I think that boots is a subtle knock on african americans. Handy Manny is a good example of a nonracist show which has none of these problems, but I think they're going so out their way to make dora ""special"" it comes off as trite. Blogs: http://jeremybiggers.blogspot.com/2006/01/racism-in-children-shows.html Bitch mag: http://bitchmagazine.org/article/factory-girl today.com: http://writingisfun.today.com/2009/12/07/dora-the-explorer-is-a-wetback/ 20:13, 23 March 2010" +" Yes, good suggestion. =Nichalp «Talk»= " +about the first paragraph the text must mention completly because a small part of a text can give a mirrored meaning . +He was indeed married three times. I can't produce any more evidence than he was my uncle. 204.52.215.112 +REDIRECT Talk:Presidio–Ojinaga International Bridge +DEAR BIGNOLE Are you gay or do you just suck AlienTravellers dick sometimes? I try to figure this out because you are always on his page and always sucking him off. Please answer me 214.13.192.187 +Adam, you've got to learn to forgive. Your 'trolling theory' is strange, but if my comments truly disturb you, I will simply cease making them. I don't have to take part in edit wars and discussion board debates to be a member of this Web-site. +" ""Show preview"" I use a lot.... though your suggestion is appreciated, it's a bit presumptuous. I use the ""Shoe preview"" button ACTUALLY QUITE A BIT, overall, in articles. The problem, Nova, is that you think somehow that I was just birthed on WP from a cabbage truck, and no next to nothing about policy and options. I don't always use ""Show preview"", but I have used that option almost 50% of the time on articles. I never even wanted to be an editor on WP, it happened ACCIDENTALLY.....because all the 4 articles (not many) that I created on WP were articles I thought would be there already. And I was surprised they weren't. So I felt compelled to create them. Also, you notice that the number of articles I have edited on WP is only about 200 not even. Cuz again, I'm more into QUALITY THAN QUANTITY. And like everyone else on WP sometimes a person gets caught up. If I WANTED to be a big shot on WP, with many created articles, and thousands of edited articles, I could....but I DO NOT WANT TO. I don't really care that much. But anyway, the point about ""Show preview"" I do use, and quite a bit.... I know it may not seem that way cuz of all the edits per page (in general), but I (especially the last 2 or 3 months) have utilized ""Show preview"" lots... Your comment here presumptuously showed that you not only thought that I did not use ""Show preview"" ever, but also that I somehow was not even aware of it. ??????? I know, ma'am....and I do use it. thanks.... " +it is probably better to discuss the content issues here on this page so that the discussion is here or in archives here for future editors to see rather than hidden in archives of a different page.  fan +Me again. Given that there are some gaping holes left to be filled between what we have already agreed, and what needs to be agreed to finish the job, where do you thing we should go from here? Cheers, +Please to not tamper with the television schedules. You shall be Blocked!!198.236.192.210 +DESIST Please do NOT post to my talk page under any circumstances. This was made clear to you - I will not support racism. +" Photon in the box is very poorly written Please a. delete b. correct in order to contain a correct explanation of what is going on: The correct explanation of the ""photon in a box"" issue is that the trajectory of the photon inside the box gets slightly curved in the gravitational field such that there is a vertical component of the photon momentum p_tangential=p*sin(theta) where p=E/c is the momentum and theta is a very small angle. At each collision with the vertical walls of the box the photon transmits a downward force dp=dp_tangential/dt to the box that can be (mis)construed as an increase of mass equal to dp/g where g is the gravitational constant. Please remove any misleading references to Δm = E/c². Such ridiculous stuff can only further the misconception that the photon has non-zero mass that can be measured. Thank you " +Because you know everything Hi Sandstein, if you have a time, may I please ask you to take a look at this thread at my talk page and state your opinion about concerns expressed by user:Balloonman? Thanks. +" Stupid? As soon as I saw the phrase ""metal is stupid"" at the very beginning of the article, I assumed I misread it. When I confirmed that it did indeed say ""metal is stupid,"" I then assumed it was vandalism. However, I don't know anything about chemistry (See: Soviet education system) so if the word ""stupid"" has some other meaning in chemistry, I would have no way of knowing or refuting it. Could someone that actually has some amount of knowledge on this subject confirm whether this is or is not vandalism or a typo or what-have-you? " +Go fuck yourself Gavin! Go fuck yourself Ryan I bet you double teamed her before you blew into each other's mouths! +"""Don't push your fortuitous luck""? Why would you say something like that to a volunteer? I don't have to help *any* Wikimedia projects. No one has to help any Wikimedia projects. " +It's so confusing to find information here for a noob OK, simple question. Where's the US stuff? - +" Administrator, I regret to inform you that from where I stand you sound like you have taken sides. In my eyes it undermines your position as an impartial arbiter and reflects upon your reputation. Overall in my view your handling of the matter has been so far lacklustre at best. You practically admitted that your decision to block me was made on impulse (you initially put a wrong reason as grounds for the block). It seems you are concentrated on watching me while turning a blind eye on how I am being treated. When one of the accusers calls me an 'unfortunate fella' and you choose to ignore it, am I correct to assume that I can also call my opponents 'unfortunate fellas' or you as a watchdog will block me for another 'personal attack'? I think your last remark is absolutely unwarranted. ""Please stop telling people not to post here""? I was not telling I was asking and very politely for that matter, as I do not want my talk page to be turned into an incoherent pile rather than than what Wikipedia creators intended it to be. I think your popping up like that and commenting a minor post of mine looks like another impulsive decision unworthy or an administrator, and also comes dangerously close to what may be interpreted as open bias and prejudice. I kindly ask to get off my back - you really need not be there, I am not such a loose cannon that scrutiny of every little post of mine would be justified. I perceive such excessively close 'guidance' as pressure, and I will act accordingly if I feel your actions contradict your status of an administrator. This is not a threat - it's a statement of my position and my intentions if such treatment continues. " +I have no problem with what you said and am not questioning your comment, for which I thank you. Having said that, I was simply putting ideas in the open about how best to resolve this issue. I hope its ok. ) +And for continuing to do cut-and-paste movies, you have been blocked. —tregoweth +" I am sorry but we don't use ""commonly referred to"" or personal experience as sources in Wikipedia. We need reliable secondary sources. Your edits has been challenged, so it is up to you to find sources that corroborate your claims in order to achieve a consensus for the addition of them to the article. You are welcome to use the talk page of the article to discuss this and present your sources there. Thanks. " +" You have the medicated gaul Mr. to the say that considering stuff like this when in the past you have said nice stuff like this about Peter and the voters of the 6th. and your inner feelings about them. ""As for the results in my own district, I'm not merely disappointed; I'm disgusted. This isn't about party politics, or my team losing; this is about humancy (sic) decency, ethics and principles. The principles of a majority of Sixth district voters appear to be greed and racism. A candidate, no matter how personally disgusting or devoid of decency, no matter how base or illegal his tactics, merely needs to promise to lower taxes and keep the Mexicans out in order to win. This race was a good example of how people let their conscience be cowed and overrun by corporate, amoral propagandists who are out to make a buck at the expense of the voters. My district has elected a racist, corrupt sophist over an able, virtuous war hero, and I am ashamed of them.""Goethean, November 2006 see it here. I think this shows your intense dislike for Peter Roskam and it could call in the question your POV regarding Peter Roskam's NPOV Biography - also, I have seen you do a lot of ""Cleansing"" your self on Democratic Office holders bios like Tammy Duckworth. So your a bit disingenuous for you to throw out contentious cracks like that MR. It could be argued that your point of view is skewed bit left. Note: It is not a personal attack to point out MR Goethean POV since he loves to point out that to others. Is that do what I say, and not what I do? Any rate, I disagree with your ownership of this subject. " +http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid;=42695234 ha ha ur jerkwad gator is trying to cover it up still +" The Guardian Review of Unapologetic It states that ""[h]er seventh album in seven years is all filthy lyrics and crashing dubstep drops: R&B-pop; turned up to 11"" all three are sourced in that one single article " +Connected Couldn't resist tarting it up ) +" Addendum documentation for ArbCom (reverted from AN by Future Perfect at Sunrise twice) (12 hours later) the admin reverted their message (Now, we can consider the matter of what happened.) [Aftermath note 1]: I created this topic when I was concerned there might be an serious (emergency) situation, but did not have sufficient knowledge of the editor's history (especially recent onwiki conversations) to judge how serious the matter was — but I had just observed behavior which was sufficiently out of the norm to not simply dismiss the replacement/message on their user page. (interact) [Aftermath note 2.a]: I may be incorrect, but I do not believe Equazcion had sufficient knowledge of the history of the administrator to simply dismiss the matter. Unfortunately, there may be more to discuss about the interaction above, but let us first clarify if I am correct or incorrect with regard to Equazcion's knowledge of the administrator history (especially recent communications/interactions). (interact) [Aftermath note 2.b]: In the interaction above Equazcion has characterized my interaction with the administrator (on User talk: Jimbo Wales) prior to the administrator's user page replacement message. Before we discuss this further, perhaps Equazcion may wish to reconsider the characterizations. (interact) (I will immediately notify Equazcion of the notes 2.a and 2.b above so they may comment. (interact) ) ===Question(s) for administrators regarding the user talk message=== The big question, of course, do we need to follow up regarding this? Clearly an administrator replacing their user page (and especially leaving it that way for 12 hours) with that is an inappropriate reaction to any situation. Note that the administrator's edits just prior to their user page replacement were: User talk: Jimbo Wales Revision as of 02:27, 14 February 2010 Rodhullandemu (→Bloqued WHY?: reply, and fuck you.) User talk: Jimbo Wales Revision as of 02:34, 14 February 2010 Rodhullandemu (→Bloqued WHY?: I'm gone.) User talk: Jimbo Wales Revision as of 02:41, 14 February 2010 Rodhullandemu (→Bloqued WHY?: goodbye) Now, what is all that the reaction to? (Hint: A mock and a ""hear hear"") Revision as of 02:15, 14 February 2010 Proofreader77 (→Bloqued WHY?: (edit conflict) Retort to Rodhullandemu who clearly has too many stars on their veteran editors medal ^;^ (Note: Python logic chip activated for Valentine's day drama) Revision as of 02:37, 14 February 2010 Proofreader77 (→Bloqued WHY?: (edit conflict) Hear hear! to Rodhullandemu's 4-star reply to that one-starred nitwit Proofreader77 ... although by a technicality only 3 are allowed. ^;^) Executive summary (light version) That (dastardly!) Proofreader77 mocked an administrator to virtual death with one silly message and a follow-up ""Hear Hear."" — should any administrator who can be mocked to virtual death so easily retain the bit? -) (interact) Executive summary (heavy version) Inappro +The pic shows the primary zords controlled by the eight Rangers, the master zords are secondary zords, and the only new zords would be Lion and Chameleon (which do not belong to the power rangers) +Keep Evolution Propaganda Out Do not cite tenuous evidence for a supposed origin of mankind in Ethiopa and cite non-scientific sources such as the Washington Post on top of it. That is absurd. Stick to well verified science and not tenusou theories, theories pushing evolutionary theory which itself has zero evidence for it. Shaky speculative theories are not helpful to a knowledge about Ethiopia. +File:Harry Potter fan Fiction History Model.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harry Potter fan Fiction History Model.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +Yes, me too. Do the merge. +" I'm not really satisifed with the language either. An editor recently reverted with a summary of: ""one of the most ridiculous edits i've ever seen. stop trying to push POV on wikipedia"". I think calling the rape of a 14 year old girl by a powerful politician an affair is just as POV and ridiculous. " +Satellite image The satellite image overlaps and conceals text. This occurs (albeit in different places) whether you're using Firefox or IE6. Could someone who knows how to make WP images look pretty fix this up? 21:06, May 15, 2005 (UTC) +" http://www.geocities.com/ostrichwonderland/characteristic.htm says a female ostrich is a hen. www.emusupply.com/basic_habits.htm says a female emu is a hen. What we call ""chicken eggs"" are actualy fowl eggs. What we call chicken (for eating) is the meat (or whole body) of young fowl. Any of various birds of the order Galliformes. The common, widely domesticated chook , Gallus gallus, are in the category of fowl. SO if you really want to refer to the common chicken stock, you might say ""Gallus Gallus"", or perhaps the breed of gallus gallus as per http://www.ithaca.edu/staff/jhenderson/chooks/chooks.html ... there are a lot of breeds ! ) " +, go act like your friends, go place Palestinian places in Israel, delete only the Arabic name from Israeli politicans, call anyone who opposes you an Arab, don't support them from the shadows, join the movement, make your local EDL proud! +" Since almost the beginning then. I just recently became a fan in late 07 and 08. I couldn't stand listening to them before then. A friend of mine loved them but I just wasn't much into metal at the time.C " +my pages aren't inappropriate you fucking bastard +Is it appropriate - or necessary/desirable - to add some indication that this article can only be viewed in full with a subscription to New Scientist (as seems to be the case for most if not all their items)? - +" Your contributed article, Polyurethane foam Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Polyurethane foam. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Polyurethane. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Polyurethane - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page. If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. " +Learning Hawaiian as a second language Stubby, no citations. If/when improved, it can be put back in the article. When trying to learn Hawaiian as a second language, without a competent teacher and without native speakers of Hawaiian as models, English-speaking learners might mispronounce Hawaiian words by using English values for the letters. Also, learners might not be aware that one cannot simply replace the English words in an English sentence with Hawaiian words as a way to create a Hawaiian sentence. Hawaiian and English have important differences in the order of words in a phrase, and the order of phrases in a sentence. Reviving Hawaiian as a first language Stubby, no citations. If/when improved, it can be put back in the article. There is a certain tension between those who would revive a purist Hawaiian, as spoken in the early 19th century, and those who grew up speaking a colloquial Hawaiian shaped by more than one hundred years of contact with English and pidgin. +Thankyou, retaL ihinnA, No need for you to call me Mr. Cenandor. Lol. +" Censorship on this page Oddly, any criticism of the special treatment accorded Mr Neblett is being removed by one user called ""NightScream"" (Is that the mighty magnificent Toure's own handle? Nightscream certainly is quick to enforce the special treatment policy that Neblett is given here!)" +" Thanks, Peregrine. Mind you, that one may be a bit misleading as, in the source, the main characters are mentioned generically, so they're not actually talking about Marth specifically here. It is a reference to the Fire Emblem lords and not Marth. I must also say that the rest of ""Reception"" isn't actually ""reception"" and shouldn't exist unless it's labeled under a different topic. To Sin Harvest, we shouldn't preserve on the article on the hope that material may one day become avilable for it." +Well, I have a fellow user TerryJ-Ho's fellow user User:Geek1975 - thanks to Bakaman +How about you shut up then!!! +Nationalism It has been said that Luther contributed to the rise of nationalism in Europe. Could this be mentioned in the article? +" I can give you the IP because it was when I was living in Los Angeles. I have no idea what the IP Address was. It was on the article about Moses and the one on Abraham. How could a Timeline not meet your rules for reliable sources. It is a timeline listing the dates for the Exodus based on the Early Dating System if 1446 BC that every Biblical Christian accepts for the Exodus. The secular dates for Egypt are the standard dates and the ones for Mesopotamia are from the ""Middle Dating System"". It doesn't contain UFOs or time travel machines, it was just a Timeline but it was from the point of view held by REAL BIBLE BELIEVING CHRISTIANS and that I suspect is why it doesn't meet your rules for reliable sources. Now if it was a timeline that proved the Bible wrong then even if it was from Bozo the Clown's site it would be a reliable source.69.14.96.9 " +":I agree with 178.21.48.174. This section should be rewritten with more clarity. (Talk?) " +Dave Mustaine and James Hetfield???? I doubt they were actually considered to be VR's singer. +">You claim I blame Poland for all of Germany's loss (which I don't) and then you go and blame Germany for all of Poland's loss, which is totally false!!! I only asked you if you blame Poland for all German losses. I did not claim knowledge of you mine. There are of course Soviet faults but in total is some 80% of Germans. >You are a petty nationalist (I would even say borderline racist) who tries to skew everything to make Poland look like the victim of history. Call me as you want. I call my self as patriot. If Poland was victim of history? Well much more then Germany, more then Russia, more then Belgium etc. We were just between two major powers of Europe in the corridor, flat territory where all goes back and forth. This is the difference between Canada and Poland. Its geographical location. You should think about it. >Poland is a nation that does not matter on the world stage. GET OVER IT, No comments. Do you love anything, maybe you only love is dollar? >don't keep trying to blame others/make excuses for Poland's failure. you can try to blame Germans/Germany for Poland's misfortune, Do you mean forgot the blood which was bloodshed. You do not know what you talking about. It should be never forgotten just for the sake of future generations. In Germany still Nazi party exists. >but her own leaders did not act to Poland's best interests in the situation, and that is why what happened happened. What happened? The II WW? Anyway do you believe Canadian leaders doing good job? It is only shallow impression because some economic prosperity. >If Poland's own rulers hadn't of weakened her before the partitions, the partitions wouldn't of been successful, end of story. Yes, democratic countries are weak. Poland was in some sense democratic country (less then USA of that days). Possibly if you know the constitution 1791 was the second on the world, just after USA. Beside role of “Solidarity” in last century it indicates something. Any way my impression is you know little about Europe history. There a lot of small countries which participation is important. >asking someone ""are you a Nazi?"" implies that you think they are. I don't know about in Poland, but when we meet a new person in the English world we don't automatically ask them ""are you a Nazi?"" It was not automatically in the case of so many German arrogant. It was only an example in conversation with you. It was not a personal question. You to often exaggerate. > and finally I don't care how or why Poland is suffering! That is bad. You show many consideration how poorly German were treated expelled from Poland. Now you show no respect to the death in concentration camps. Just beautiful. I could not expect anything more. Now: Are you Nazi? >I asked for a reference and got it, that is all that was needed. not some lecture from a crusading nationalist who likes to dabble in historical revision (but its more like historical denial) For sure I need not lecture from you how I should treat my fatherland. Also I need not lecture how to treat German revisionism. I am not revisionist I accept the present borders of Poland ))), I do not look for revision. You do. >The Potsdam agreement was not a binding agreement, and it never gave the land to Poland, it gave them temporary administration over the lands, It is you interpretation check the American, British and other atlases. Give me the “temporary” proof if you can. >and using that administration they expelled and murdered millions of Germans, millions? Do not be funny. Murdered maybe accidentally a few, it could happened because the post war disorder. After the war, what was German fault anyway. Millions you are absolute arrogant, where came from the number. You will have to apologize I am sure. In total was 3 millions how many death. Such number you are perfect crazy in XIX century Trucks did kill 1.5 million Armenians and we know it and after WW II in center of Europe MILLIONS of Germans. I have no words on you insolence. You will apologize it in bold big font on first line of the discussion or I will publicize you all around the World. Andrew " +Really? The don't (didn't) in my local Sainsbury's. Would you say they were popular? I mean, now-a-days some Tesco's are bigger than the towns their in, not everything they sell is to be described as 'popular'.. +" That's what a link is for. Might as well just put ""grooved whale whale"" everywhere. Why not mysticete whale? Or odontocete whale? In a week I'll add ""moustached whale whale"" and ""toothed whale whale"" everywhere just for you. ) " +" (the references didn't have much to say about ""regions"")" +Don't be a douche, CKATZ. +" Merge proposal I am proposing merging the character articles here as a list. The articles themselves do not seem to possess any particular notability for the characters (it's not inherited from the main article) and consist solely of descriptions of the plot, which sometime overlap. There is nothing to give an ""out of universe"" view for any of these characters and a quick google search didn't seem to bring anything to light either. " +Relevant to a mature understanding of this topic is Keyfabe - a term from the world of professional wrestling, but which applies in a wider context. Individual cases require thoughtful judgment, but one thing we should be clear on: not everything in tabloids is true. A fair amount of it is staged PR fluff. Another portion of it is simply bad reporting that the stars don't complain about because it is harmless. There are often good reasons to take it all with a grain of salt. +May 2012 (UTC) I think the reason Canada had such a high death toll was most likely because they have poorly trained soldiers, as well it is important to note that Canada was only there from 2002 - 2011. Other countries have been in Afghanistan a lot longer than that... 07:55, 30 +A new prince has been born and lives in Utah. +Well, I don't know if this fits the definition of Assembly Hall or not, but the Witnesses in Ft. Lauderdale or so bought some stadium or something like that from the government, and supposedly use it for district conventions. I've never been there, and I don't know if a source for this could be found, but I have been told the story of how the purchase went down in pretty good detail, by an elder in the same state. +Your input is requested As you have recently edited Andy Martin (American politician), I am writing to request your input at the article talk page, sections Vexed and disputed are the ones which outline the current issue. Many thanks in advance for your time. ?!? +|listas = Murray, Donald Walter Gordon +Thats all I need is a dork Wikipedia Robot lecturing me. The same group of scum bag tandem editors that have controlled and now want to misrepresent any and all articles connected with Technocracy issues ... even to the point of trying to delete the article now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johnfos#The_Signpost:_17_October_2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Epipelagic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Beagel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lawrencekhoo Mostly they collude to give bad information. TAB The same group of tandem editors from several years ago still try and control this article. They want to eliminate an article about one of the major social movements ... the group that started it. Wikipedia is known for special interest control and buddy editing. Its a pity and the reason a serious article on an important American group is being tried to be done away with by tandem editors that obviously object for some reason to the content. The past clearly shows the same team of tandem editors here. Beagle and Johnphos are tandem editors as is Lawrencekhoo and Epipelagic... One of the most significant groups in American history and they want to get rid of the article. Its pathetic and shows the weakness of en. Wikipedia. Lawrencekhoo is a mainstream economist who ax grinds economic articles Google his name for his economic 'beliefs' Gino +She doesn't stop spinning to the right Seriously, I've tried for like ten minutes, tried applying all of the hints in this page, it is impossible for her to just magically start spinning in the opposite direction! She spins to the right, not to the left, otherwise her boobs and hair would appear on the other side of her body, anyone who has claimed to see her dance to the left needs a powerful set of glasses.211.28.54.73 +hey why the fuck is it so hard to get an article on here? +Thank you for experimenting with the page Poverty on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. + R/W +" Chart positions I don't think it is necessary or appropriate to include chart position information in this list. Most songs did not chart, and those songs that did chart are listed as such on The Beatles discography and the individual song pages. —''''''→✉ " +" Use of lists in citations What is the thinking behind using lists in the citations? Take this reference for example ^ a b c d e f g h i Suggested interpretation of War Powers in the Bush administration * The Unitary Executive: Is The Doctrine Behind the Bush Presidency Consistent with a Democratic State? By JENNIFER VAN BERGEN, Findlaw, January 09, 2006 * The President Does Not Know Best By Elizabeth de la Vega, Tomdispatch.com. Posted January 19, 2006 * How Much Authority Does the President Possess When He Is Acting as ""Commander In Chief""? Evaluating President Bush's Claims Against a Key Supreme Court Executive Power Precedent By EDWARD LAZARUS, FindLaw, January 5, 2006 * George Bush's rough justice - The career of the latest supreme court nominee has been marked by his hatred of liberalism by Sidney Blumenthal, The Guardian, January 12, 2006 * Vice President Cheney and The Fight Over ""Inherent"" Presidential Powers: His Attempt to Swing the Pendulum Back Began Long Before 9/11By John W. Dean, FindLaw,February 10, 2006 * Konzentration der Macht - Sollten die Republikaner die Wahlen am 4. November gewinnen, gefährden sie mit ihren Kandidaten für den Obersten Gerichtshof letztlich die amerikanische Verfassung by Garry Wills, Süddeutschen Zeitung, October, 29, 2008. Here we have 6 different citations cobbled together, including one in German and at least one editorial, that is sited 9 times in the article. This use of citation lists smacks of wp:syn, especially the use of editorials. " +I don't propose to change it exclusively to Kyiv. It should be Kyiv(also known Kiev). Check please Mumbai. Absolutely the same situation. One to one. Thus: either Mumbai should become Bombay (also known Mumbai) or Kyiv should be change to Kyiv(also know Kiev). (But it does matter only if you don't put common over logical). 94.244.129.207 +"__TOC__ Hello ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for signing up. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement.Best of luck. Have fun! ElectricEye Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help Where to ask a question Help Desk Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump" +notability This person is notable because he is the director of the best business school in Asia. And we have articles for less notable directors of other IIMA s like the one for Raipur +sky brightness graph Albester, where did u get the sky brightness graph from? i'm trying to recreate it for different atmospheres. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks. +Thank you very much Bonkers! ) +I added both set of termini to the page. I couldn't find any style rules that matched with this situation. I'm looking for a reference source for the open sections of the north tollway in order to correct length. +REDIRECT Talk:Snow White (1995 film) +" I stand corrected on the nursing school, but the ""School of Health Related Professions"" does take incoming freshman. How about, ""In 2006, the average ACT score of entering freshmen at the Oxford campus was 23.0."" end of sentence? That way the ACT score is listed on the site. " +Feel free to email me at Special:EmailUser/VQuakr if you wish to contact me non-publicly. +"It's not all of a sudden, check the article's discussion page, I have proven that he's an Arab: so, not all sources agree. Also, please do tell me what other ""numerous sources"" you have to provide? Obviously it's a weasel word, you only have one source, same as me. This makes it at the very least disputed. You refuse to see this, and continue calling him Persian to spread your propaganda. " +I have filed a request for comment on NCdave. You can visit the page by going +March 2008 Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see Policy on neutral point of view Guideline on spam Guideline on external links Guideline on conflict of interest If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! +Hi. Welcome, again. What you created was an encyclopedia article - your actual user page is +"==May 2008== Re: Once on This Island. Hello, thought you might like to know that the word is spelled: ""villain"". Also, in the song list The Internet Broadway Database for this show lists the performers for the song ""Why We Tell the Story"" as ""Storytellers"", so that is what the article should show, unless you have another verifiable source that shows otherwise. (See WP:VERIFY.)Thank you. " +HahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAa great joke now sriram vellala thevdiya payyan become a time machine went back to past and found kaikola changed there name as isaivellala hahahahahaha poi un parabaraya kelu ethanadevdiyava koilukku kodutheenganu. +not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem!... Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in hell with the other Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them. +Thanks for checking that out... (I think the Soulforce article is a bit under-referenced too...) +" Dreadstar /Arielgold, Obviously imperialist Yankee Captain Kirks cannot understand simple English or establish contact with alien cultures. I did not ask you to search for ""Dogsoc"", I asked you to search for ""Nandigram"" in Google News (I do hope that you can cut and paste). A High Court of India (which incidentally under India's Constitution is more powerful than even the Supreme Court of India) has stayed (ie. banned) publication of the concerned scanned document which is the ""little red book"" of this particular jihad (I suspect you know what this word means - as in a ""Butlerian jihad"") in Nandigram. Unfortunately I cannot give you 3 official citations - just 1 from the High Court OFFICIAL website which clearly refers to ""DOGSOC"" as ""Dismantling Govts Selling Out Citizens (oops) etc"" You will have to move fast since unlike Judgements of the Supreme Court of India which are archived permanently on the internet, High Court Orders are required by law only to be given to affected persons, and are only online for 15 days and must thereafter be accessed by formal application with copying fees to the concerned Court. " +Category:Johannes Vermeer paintings I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:Johannes Vermeer paintings]] to articles/categories that belong in it. I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty. If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with . Best regards, +" RE: Life on Mars refs Thanks, nice of you to say so. You are welcome. Police,Mad,Jack ☺ " +fuck god youn shit asshole +Ways to improve Reference 36 Hi, I'm Salimfadhley. Download, thanks for creating Reference 36! I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Appears to be a vanity or advertising page for a brand or model of musical instrument. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. +gay just visit eco-mechanics.com +" Hello!! Hi, Pa7, yes, I'm back. Thanks for the warm welcome. Man, you guys have been busy. And there is peace on the Rani article! I was so surprised! Everything is going really smoothly, isn't it? It's good to be here again. ) Best regards, Talk2Me " +That's absolutely fair. Both should be reduced (ideally eliminated, but I have a feeling that won't be the consensus here). — +{{unblock|reason=No actual research was done. +|AMIGA]] German article; +" That's besides the point. The image needs to be slightly upsized. Just look, instead of blindly reverting.- '''' " +" I changed from ""the following three weeks"" to ""when used"", because when you write ""the following three weeks"", readers want to know when he scored his next goal. Lets say, after a month, he scores his next goal, then readers want it to be like ""... he scored his next goal after one month."" And we dont want overdetail so ""when used"" is much better, as he is isnt playing every game or a starter. So please don't revert it. His next goal we mention should be a important goal for him or the team so ""when used"" is better. " +According to Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_for_Japan-related_articles/misc2#Template_for_articles_Japanese_terms, the manual of style IS (Kanji, romanized), and that's IT. +Note that this matrix you linked to in the Wikipedia page is not for sRGB primaries, but for the RGB primaries from the original Wright/Guild data. It’s not meant to be used to convert colors for the web, for example. +" 2006 (UTC) I agree with the ""it's like different namings"", so Ancient = English ie. Milky Way name for any individual of the FIRST evolution of mankind, (At)Lanteans = Pegasus name after ""Atlantis"", but then: Alteran = (is Latin for ""the others"" - and Latin was influenced by Merlin&Co-returners; to Milky Way) all Ancients that left the Home Galaxy (now:OriGalaxy) for the Milky Way (explains the Alteran Communication Device MilkyWay<->OriGalaxy); Ori = group of people disagreeing with the technological ideology, preferring religion and staying home. cf.. Hm. Parliament 18:58, 9 November" +When an article has content on a different subject under the same topic, it is best to use a subsection. After the main section heading, which uses the formatting ==Section title==, create a subsection with the formatting ===Subsection title===, which uses three = on both sides instead of two. You can read more about how they work at Help:Section. Please do not use the a horizontal rule () for this because it is deprecated, as explained at Wikipedia:Layout#Horizontal rule. In the future, please sign your comments on talk pages by adding ~~~~ at the end. This will identify that you wrote the comment and the date and time you wrote it. All of this and more is explained at Wikipedia:Signatures. Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! talk +OK cheers mr. I'll give it a go. +fuck u cocksucker, fuck u!! ill do what i want its an online community and whats a community without cryme? +History of the Jews in Hungary Hi Reinyday: Thanks for the reminder about the template. I was trying to alert the Wikipublic that the history stopped in the 1880s and needs to be updated to include the Holocaust and Communist periods. I mentioned this on the talk page. Hope that explains why I used the template. FeanorStar7, thank you so much for your kind explanation. It is greatly appreciated! I've restored the template. Reinyday, +No, i've edited via ip for years though. Qwest ip, usually in the 71.215... range. Now a question for you; why do you engage in blatant POV pushing on the Pollard page? Wouldn't you agree that blatant POV pushers should be banned from the project? +Spare us Instead of inserting idiotic comments about subjects you clearly know nothing about, why not try doing a simple Google search first. e.g. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe;=off&q;=%22thomas+cannon%22+homosexuality&btnG;=Search But that would imply self-doubt, wouldn't it. And be so tiresome. And so unnecessary for someone who has, what, a Barnstar? Never mind your laziness or stupidity: I spit on your arrogance. +I have reverted an revised changes which Sharkbite217 undid. I assume his reasoning for the undo was because the added info contained Gogs projected involvement in Final crisis (something that seems obvious, but has not been officially announced. I removed all predictions and made the added info stick to only the facts given in JSA #14. I did like the addition of the fact that the origin of Gog in pre-infinite crisis does not match this current version. Now that the addition has been fixed, I hope that anyone who edits this adds two it and does not simply revert it. If you do revert something, explain your reasoning so we don't get into and editing war. Thanks It is important to note that there have been three different origins for Gog. And all three characters made it to the main D.C. continuity. His Hyperspace spanning, Time traveling, Multiverse jumping nature makes this character inherently hard to grasp when looking at the multiverse or even just the main DC universe. First, from the Kingdom Come timeline: He Survived Kansas's destruction. Given powers by the Quintessence, he stole Superman and Wonder Woman's baby, went back through Hypertime killing Superman over and over again. He was defeated in the Main DC continuity by Kingdom Come and main versions of the heroes. The second version of Gog was basically a homage to the first, but without the tricky use of Hypertime and the Kingdom come continuity. He survived Topeka's (only) destrucion. He kept going back in time and advancing his work over and over. This Guy made it into the pages of Superman comics. The third version is the one in the current run of JSA. He claimed he was got his power from Gog, Last God of the Third World. And he complained about all of kansas being destroyed. This origin actually resembles the first more than the second. This makes it likely that he is from Earth-22, like the superman in JSA. It is common for the new 52 Earths to resemble previous DC comic's Elseworlds, but have some differences. It has already been shown that Earth-22 resembles Kingdom Come, but has some slight differences. This explains the Kansas destruction being the same, but the change in his power source being from quintessence to a Third World god. Although time will tell if this is right, it does seem like the logical conclusion. Someone can add this to the article when it is revealed in the pages of JSA. To answer the above question, the Quintessence were fooled. Phantom stranger thought that this man, who came out of the Kansas massacre, and started a Superman Church, would be a good representative of the values that the quintessence hold. But they were mistaken (gods a fallible in comics). The guy snapped after getting the powers, went a little nuts, and killed Superman over and over. The quintessence decided not to take back their power, but I am not sure if they explained why. +I think in fact the ECB sees ACS as the official body on List A though the current chairman would have details as I believe he works for ECB. +Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing material in articles will normally be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. t 02:45, 2004 Sep 14 (UTC) +I dont care about the flag but if or any one else thinks that they put me in place they are mistaken! But I did sugested and took it to talk page. +Nice job So you just go around destroying other people's efforts of completing half-done wikipedia pages? Go away. +I echo the sentiments of above person (14 year old socialist) +You're lying too. Chuck Marean +" Well if it is true that they are the only technology to be allowed to produce trees on the fly, that is somewhat noteable. However I agree that it is too markety. I am at a loss for how to fix it, though. @ " +" I didn't look at the page, so I don't know what changes you kept. The whole section on the psychology of the fallacy is unacceptable in WP: it is all just made up. I guess ""vandalism"" is just meant to be a sort of threat. As if there were any way of blocking Hamish. Anyway he is continuing this edit war, after the page protection, and he's still not talking, except to call me ""a shallow, selfish fool""... Have fun with it. —tc " +LOL!!!!! Like you can stop me. I am forever eternal you fagboy. Can't you be a little more creative and less obtuse? 70.149.233.153 +Discovery Shouldn't there be a section on how and when humans discovered that there are different blood types? +Article Split Up I think that splitting up Good Luck Charlie (Season 1), Good Luck Charlie (Season 2), and Good Luck Charlie (Season 3) is a great idea and I think it should be done, especially with a movie coming out on December 2nd and Season 3 slated to start next year. 74.98.248.247 +I don't know if this is the right place to ask a question - I'm more familiar with the Esperanto Wikipedia, which I write for. When I am signed in to my English language account, all the links are underlined. Is there a way I can change that? +Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. .Also please refrain from adding stubs to Wikipedia. +Big Classic Could you please resurrect this page, I would like to get it up to quality standards and wuld like to use the old data as a starting point. - Jeremy ( ) +" Hi Wknight94. I don't agree that 74% is a consensus, although I understand Wikipedia rules may give discretion to a bureaucrat to tilt a decision one way or the other. I can tell you Opposion to Elonka was generally highly motivated, and as far as I know, justified. What is a ""circus"" indeed is to have to deal with Elonka when her opinion differs from yours. Actually for the last 3 days of the RfA, Oppose votes roughly equalled Support votes in number: the reality is that Oppose got more and more steam as the discussion drew on. Regards. " +actions and intentions and refuse to get involved in drama over +REDIRECT Talk:Dry Creek, Oklahoma +?? U left a note on my talk page about a message for me on your talk page, but I cannot find anything here. you have so much stuff here that I got a headache trying to sift through it. But then you deleted the message from my page. ?????? +REDIRECT Talk:Chickamauga Wars (1776-1794) +" You don't have to prove anything to me, but you have to cite it per the link above. I don't know this person from Adam, but I do remove all non-cited/wikipaged additions to CT school's ""Notable alumni"" sections. " +Company Policy My company apologises for any inconvinience caused at 7:15PM GMT. My Company also apologises to Wikipedia itself for pretending to be one of them. I Can not give the Companys name due to Terms and Conditions but the user Oxymoron83 deleted an article which was in fact an agreed article by this person himself. As Proof my company will send a link to view the documents which are not confidential. Our Company understands that we are going against Wikipedias Terms and Conditions and this will never happen again. Our Company has never and never will act out any fraud on the internet. But Oxymoron, if you would like to reinstall that article that would be great. +Let me guess, You're going to try and convince one of your admin buddies that i broke some obscure rule?, Compared to what you have done (Repeatedly insulting Gamergate supporters, Taking money from a hate group to edit a Wikipedia page, etc) i'm the model of a perfect user. +Sulayman In Arabic From the beginning of the article, a correction shall be made to the name of Solomon in the various languages: in Arabic the name is not mentioned << Persian: سليمان>>. This is Arabic because Iran reads in Arabic writing and the Kuran in Persia is written in Arabic. A correction makes the article look complete. +REDIRECT Talk:Princess Margaret Secondary School (Surrey) +February 2009 (UTC) No response Buckshot06? You went and banned me for 12 hours without warning and out of the blue for a statement that was not uncivil, especially compared to comments I've shown you that Noclador has made. Then you went and also tried to put more bans in place. Hmm, and then I see that you edit pages together with Noclador. Bias? 07:52, 7 +"Why do Jews get their own special term for discrimination against them? Black people don't have ""anti-ebonism"" native Americans don't have ""anti-nativism"" and Arabs don't have ""anti-arabism"". (Actually since Arabs are Semites, anti-semitism is directed at them as well) The only thing this proves is that Jews think they're special and exclusive and should get special treatment, even though many ethno-religious groups have suffered to the same or greater extent, only the JEWS should get a special name for their type off suffering. Pretentious bastards. " +" Fine, change the goal posts to suit. No problem. Considering the support he can whip up for his agenda, i'll do my best to make future contributions ""Damac proof"" before posting. Just don't be suprised if more of his bogus edits of serious contributions cause problems. " +" NOTE: My name is only spelled with ONE ""b"". MonkeysEatGrass " +If only you could understand the purpose of policies, but you are too narrowminded +" You said right there that you weren't going to answer me, I asked again at 01:01 for some clarification; you started editing again at 02:09 and didn't answer. I figured it was reasonable to believe that you weren't going to answer, since that's what you said. I asked again and just said if there wasn't any answer I wouldn't know any other route except deletion, and I waited further for your response, which you gave now. At no point did I actually nominate them for deletion, but rather I gave you notice of my intention. I don't think this was rude. As to the actual matter of the title overrides, you are going around telling people that ""per WP:StS"" they need to do something, when in fact that redirect goes to your userspace which looks like a Wikiproject. I believe this is extremely misleading, and I believe you need to take down the title overrides so that it is not so misleading, as well as stop telling people to do things per some proposal you have made in your userspace. — acan — " +Lostprophets Lostprophets is a Nu metal band. Their first album thefakesoundofprogress is clearly nu metal and not Alternative metal.88.88.23.109 +" A cup of tea for you! good " +hopefully on the way to being done - see comments below on consistency of dates. +Insane Stupid Imbecile Witch Bluerasberry can you describe these terms to your throbbing vagina please. +guess what ur retarded +Sorry. You smell of pickles and farty bums. You smell like a bum with a pikle shoved up its hole. You smell of piss. +" The so-called Wikipedia:Synthesis in this case is actually not that at all, as it merely concerns a refutation of your argument, and not anything actually written in this article. In any case, though, Microsoft states the following at the link I provided, something that sounds clear enough to me: ""Platform tokens describe your operating system."" It seems to me that you should provide evidence (as opposed to similar synthesis-like arguments of your own) that Microsoft explicitly no longer considers NT to exist; failing that, the current wording of this article regarding this issue should remain. " +DONT HATE FUCK A MATE +Hi Dear Sikh brothers, I would request all you all to please help me in exposing Sikh Scholar, who actually is an RSS sponsered person pretending to be Sikh, please see below the kind of statements he makes to me Wow wow so the truth is finaly out....you have spoken like a true Hindu RSS wala......is that the way a scholar speaks...wow...(my answere to him) (Sikh Scholars comments to me)....... stupid dumb FU*K MY great great great great grandfather was Mani Singh the greatest of Sikh matrys. Its scum like you that needs to be executed. You deserve execution - you stupid dumb fu*k everyone in my family over 500 members are Baptized Khalsa SIKHS. We have been Khalsa Sikhs for over 300 years you dumb fu*ker. Because you have insulted me and broken the teachings of the Guru Granth Sahib you deserve death -you dumb fu*ker.Sikh scholar (talk) (my answere to him)...Now I will be after you to expose all your RSS gang pretending to be Sikhs and being some kind of expert in Sikh religion...it my promise to you Fake scholar... He is being supported by few other RSS sponsered members in Wikipedia with regards to SINGH article here. +The US Military exists to protect freedom. Support for the US Military is support for freedom. I almost didn't even reply to you because you are so ignorant. +" Millions of editors, and I'm the only one who uses it? This kid's brain must be stuck. Global perspective = doesn't exist. Easy. Sorry about this, Ianmacm, the user in question has taken this pathetic discussion to a half-dozen different talk pages over the past month. |The|Whovian " +Change from Yugoslavia to Califonia made after consulting her nephew. +Here You Go... Nope! Never accused you of calling me names. Just another one of your delusions. So, just to shut you up, here are the dates and proof of the Hayes Seminar infiltration that you don't believe happened. Just like the White House, this is the only documentation I am going to provide in a futile attempt to satisfy you. All the rest of your arguments and allegations are just as full of crap as you are. I can disprove them all. But, I'm tired of answering the same stupid questions over and over and wasting time with turkeys like you who REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE TRUTH even when it bites them on the bum, LOL Now, go check with your buddy Hayes, you claim to be able to do that, to confirm this and then come back here and apologize like the whipped dog you are. Don't wonder off the topic! You said this didn't happen and that I couldn't confirm it. Here is the proof that YOU are a liar. Ashida Kim +" Edit request from LikeLakers2, 1 October 2011 Please remove {{pp-semi-blp|small=yes}} from the page. Note to admins: As an alternative, you can remplace {{pp-dispute|expiry=October 4, 2011}} and {{pp-semi-blp|small=yes}}, and replace it with this: {{subst:User:LikeLakers2/spp|expiry=October 4, 2011|reason=dispute}} This should automatically detect protection settings and add protection templates as needed. (If you use my template, please subst it. Make sure to click ""Show Changes"" to make sure it adds the right templates, though) (talk | ) " +" Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea I note that you began this article. However, the SC of PNG is not actually a separately constituted court: like the Full Courts of the Supreme Courts the Australian States and formerly of the Supreme Courts of the Canadian Provinces (before the creation of the provincial Courts of Appeal early in the 20th century), it is an ad hoc tribunal consisting of judges of the National Court who are empanelled from time to time to hear specific appeals and references. The Chief Justice and the Registrar are ""of the Supreme and National Courts""; the puisne justices are not actually referred to as justices of the Supreme Court. This article should really be renamed ""Supreme and National Courts of Papua New Guinea"" since discussion of the work of the SC in an article of its own is somewhat artificial given that it is actually an appellate committee. I, alas, don't know how to do this. Can you manage it? " +could you post us the link that shows how we are now encouraged to do our citations. Your why seems fine, and I would definitly use it. Thanks for that. +" I made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Autoshotdc/sandbox&diff;=672433734&oldid;=672429097 these edits, partly MOS, but also adjusting text I thought was too promotional. Further comments to follow - talk to me? " +" Hi ECarSecurity, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log. Good luck, and have fun. (Talk) (Contribs) " +(cooking, pasteurising, freezing, etc.) +" WP:SPA / sockpuppet accounts Admins: Please note that per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/St_Christopher, accounts which have the single purpose of editing this article and its talk page may be considered as a single editor, are restrained from making disruptive edits, and may be banned if they do so. Current single purpose accounts are: This is how Leuko typically tries to deal with editors who don't agree with his point of view when editing this article, he tries to silence them rather than hash it out in good faith. You can see that my account in not single purpose since I have a number of edits (minor, but still edits, I'm more of a WikiGnome in other areas) in other articles. You will also notice that even though Actually 75% of the contribs from this IP address are related to this article, so considering other people may have made some of the non-related edits, that indicates that this is a WP:SPA for editing this article. I grouped the SPA's together because as the ArbCom case said, they can be regarded as a single editor using sockpuppets when editing disruptively. I'll add the other one too if it makes you happy. I try and WP:AGF too, but it's hard with the history of abusive sockpuppetry and personal attacks perpetuated in the past, which still continues. 75% means that 1 out of 4 edits has been on articles outside this area, that's not a terrible ratio, and certainly shows this is not a WP:SPA. Also, if you look at the quality of the edits you will notice that the majority of that 75% are to rephrase comments I have made or simple/minor spacing or formatting issues. It may be your opinion that the edits by the users you listed were ""disruptive"" but I doubt you will find a reasonable person that will agree with you on this. I agree that it's unfortunate that some biased editors continue there attacks and campaign of disinformation but it seems that some people just can't help themselves. Demanding that information be removed because other editors would not provide you with a physical copy of a newspaper article which is cited is definitely not productive. Now I had to look up what a buckytube was, but I don't think this comment was very supportive of the nature of the edits on this page: . Well, that's your opinion. Actually, since you were able to prove the existence of the article without a physical copy demonstrates that it was rather easy to obtain verification. I don't think asking for verification for information that is included in an article in what is supposedly an ""encyclopedia"" is asking too much. Without verification Wikipedia would be no better than any other garbage out there on the internet. Do you really think that even basic verification to prove that material even existed is unnecessary? Yes, it was rather easy to obtain for someone who had the desire to actually re-verify a source which has been there for a year. I don't know why it needed to be such a difficult process. You tell me, you were the one that was complaining about it being so difficult. indefinitely blocked as WP:SPA exhibiting same behaviour as editors sanctioned above. Guy () indefinitely blocked as WP:SPA exhibiting same behaviour as editors sanctioned above. Guy () indefinitely blocked as WP:SPA exhibiting same behaviour as editors sanctioned above. Guy () {{userlinks +Yes. We are creating an inference here. There are numerous reasons why participation might change. - +Yes, I am seriously suggesting that anti-gg hasn’t harassed anyone. I myself know of no reliable report that anyone identifying themselves as opposed to GamerGate has threatened to rape or murder anyone. Please cite your sources. +By the way, you're an ass! +Muppet, that a new one. Well, look at your buddy (VT) +You don't understand! No one understands me. Mr White gets what he deserves. +RED LINKS I am trying to get rid of all the red links anyone who can assist is very welcome +Henrietta Van LAer says I OBJECT STRONGLY TO EDIT-WARRING WHICH HAS REMOVED MY CONTRIBUTIONS OF FACTS TO THIS ARTICLE. The material had all been discussed in the talk pages and was consensus approved. The user or users responsible should be banned and the contributions put back in the article main text immediately. +Ugh, I don't know why I have trouble staying logged in. As if you hadn't guessed 69.169.45.89 is me. +Who are YOU to tell ME??!! I'll do WHAT I like WHEN I like...cocksucker!! +Hi 3gg5amp1e. The CAPTCHA message appears for users who are not yet autoconfirmed. Autoconfirmed accounts have over ten edits and are over four days old; you have the edits but not the account age. So, the best course is to simply wait until you become autoconfirmed. If you're impatient, you could request to be confirmed early at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed, but looking at that page it seems like those requests are not often granted. (Did I mess up?) +The public perception of new religious movements should be mentioned even though this public perception is sometimes completely baseless. If the public perception is baseless then it should still be mentioned and debunked in wikipedia. I have to think about the renaming thing. 19:43, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC) +" nice try but ilkhanids,mughals and timurids have more (strong) connection and relationship with so called iranians than turkics.the name ""iran"" adopted after 1935 becuase hitler ordered it(it looks like a joke but sadly it is not).before 1935 there was no iran. modern ""iran"" is noting but modern nomads of ilkhanids and timurids . all the base culture was created much before than ""iranians"" , mongols , and mughals. turkic dynasties are much older than any other dynasties of this three . but thanks to wikipedia gangsters, there will be no any turkic history left in asia." +Would you mind taking a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bochasanwasi_Shri_Akshar_Purushottam_Swaminarayan_Sanstha#Lead_Section_Neutrality.2C_Length_.26_Court_Proceedings_leading_to_excommunication_of_Shastri when you have a chance. I am interested in your opinion. +" ragnarok ragnarök What is it you don't understand? ""Ragnarok"" is the english word. Like it's the Norwegian and Danish word. Not Old Norse. Old Norse use runes. And there are also different spellings in old Norse. Comanche cph " +Seltzer was introduced nationally in 1883 so probably not considering the old fashion predates this. But what do I know, i'm not even valuable enough to contribute without being reverted. +" Sorry Remember me from my old vandal days? Especially this range of edits. Sorry for doing that. Now I am a good wikipedian. Thanks,  T·C " +" File:Bust of Otis Bowen.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bust of Otis Bowen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. hi! " +" (UTC) EC appeared on Have I Got News For You (Season 6, Episode 1 it's on YouTube)as Paul's guest with Derek Hatton as Ian's guest. I quoe: ""Derek and I were at school together."" 14:16, 19 July 2008" +Lots to go yet, but sandboxing it . +The article's looking better and better! One other idea for an article, if you're still searching: there's a lot out there on Eddie Kinner. talk +":::::::::::Edit warring, POV pushing, and not listening to advice despite the informer AGF; you know, the usual kind of cuntish stuff that disrupts the project. talk " +Get Off My Talk Page U Troublemakers. Buzz Off, Get Lost Stalkers. +Boing! said Zebedee Ostensibly you blocked me for accusing Sitush in the course of this discussion, for a personal attack ,which you explain here stemmed from me using the words and phrases like horrendous , abject lies , fraudulent methods on various pages Very well , you are an admin and acted to discharge your duty , as you deem judicious . But There are a couple of incongruities here . 1) Please categorically state weather in your best judgment , calling someone a a wind up merchant'' , is ,or is not , a personal attack ? 2) and if not , which specific topic/wikipedia content page does this post of Sitush , in which Sitush is callin me a a wind up merchant ,progressed ? +Some years ago in the Canadian Forces a female superior officer could be addressed as either sir ma'am, and some of them had a preference for one or the other. — Z. 2008-06-02 18:01 z +But... ...the article meets the requirements of being referenced and so on, and this is precisely the comment I am making, so can the banner please come down now? +Here is the link that uses the CMH information, and is under the CMH copyright: John Lesesne DeWitt +" Times are more appropriate to Wikinews; Wikipedia is more geared to describing events after they've happened. But since all is still up in the air, I see no reason to change anything much, per WP:RECENTISM, more like WP:DEADLINE. andemu " +" November 2014 (UTC) I have read the IHE article: I said so. Of whom do you consider this view ""highly representative""? How would you know? We do know Sargon espouses it, whoever he is, and that some people on shady message boards endorse it but that can be said of all sorts of WP:FRINGE views. No other reporter seems to have mentioned this large and highly representative strand of thought. I'm not sure how we would know what a large scale effort within GG ranks would be; would that be anything like Operation 5 Horsemen, the GG attack on Wikipedia? I continue to think that, if we must mention this at all, it should be a sentence of the form, “Inside Higher Education reported on a conspiracy theory common among GamerGate supporters that held that DiGRA was a radical feminist front organization bent on world domination [78]”. 00:24, 19" +Please will the various anonymous posters above provide some reliable sources to support their claims. - +" Ok, whatever, but if this separate Frankish province existed as such, then I still believe that it should be included as separate entry into disambiguation page, but I can live with the current version of the page as well. (talk) " +Did you know has been updated And one of the articles you've recently created is part of the line-up. Enjoy! - |(talk)]] 08:16, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC) +First, I am a SHE, not a he. Second, my parents decided to give me this name. Third, Warmpuppy doesn't like Puyo Puyo. I, however, do. +" ps: Having an anonymous IP does not mean being ""everybody`s sockpuppet""" +" Please note that even if the copyright issue were resolved, the promotional tone of a company or personal website is likely to be unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Article subjects need to have notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing ""significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."" There is more detail at WP:Notability (people), and good advice on how to write an acceptable article at WP:Your first article. Regards, " +" It is not all right. I am not attacking anyone and Sean is pursuing a personal issue against me, not working within the policies. And Jossi, please don't harass me about blanking my talkpage. If I want it blank, I'm going to blank it, no matter what you or you cohorts put on it. Why don't you boys go and find something useful to do instead of bullying other editors? Grace Note. Um, if you have a warning on that page, blanking the warning off is cause for a block. +: t/c " +If your reason for denial is not true, wouldn't it be best to withdraw your comment or grant the overturn? How does an incorrect denial of appeal become a viable choice and why +Your article I have moved your draft article from your user page to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lynette Wallworth where you can continue working on it until you feel it is ready for submission. +" Modi Government " +Three revert rule – admins if you can read this before blocking me On Whitehouse Institute of Design, I've probably inadvertently violated the three-reverts rule. Alans1977 introduced material to the article that I disagreed with, I consequently removed it and started a discussion on the talkpage. He's since reverted me twice, and I've reverted him. He then asked Libstar to intervene (and tried to contact him on Skype), who I'm guessing is going to report me somewhere soon enough. I don't know enough about the process to pre-emptively report him/them, but I feel like I'm being tag teamed, especially since Libstar only intervened when he knew I'd have to violate three-reverts rule to revert him. I think Whitehouse Institute of Design should be semi-protected at the pre-May 23 article while this is sorted out. Cheers, 124.169.104.184 +Alois sex life and parentage Given his subsequent behaviour, it seems unlikely that Alois reached his mid-twenties before discovering sex. Therefore it seems likely that Adolf may have had other half-brothers and sisters apart from Thekla/Thelka's child. Is there any indication that anyone came forward claiming to be a half-sibling during Adolf's rise to power? If so, what became of them? Also, how strictly was the ban on Jews enforced prior to 1860? I expect there were illegal immigrants them as there are today. Could a wealthy tobacco merchant (Frankenburger) have bribed officials to ignore his presence? TCH. Hastings. UK. +Hi. I (as far as I'm aware) do not actually have any special privileges yet, so no adminship, etc... In regards to my nominating a page you created for speedy deletion, that is something every user can do. That being said, special privileges must be earned, through a solid (and reasonably long) history of good editing and community engagement. If I didn't answer your question (or you have more questions), please contact me; I would be more than happy to help you get accustomed to editing Wikipedia. And don't forget to sign your posts with four tildes (~). Merci beaucoup! Here are some handy links: Requests for Adminship User Access Levels +VERY SAD It is sad that Ms. Elonka has nothing more to do with her time then to make a career out of misinformation and attacking people. +Hell, no. I ain't serving the war, I was helping people, This is fucked up. +There have been some recent edits that I wanted to discuss why I reverted. First, I introduced a commonly accepted definition for the introduction lead by the American Planning Association and the McGill University School of Urban Planning. While there are many definitions out there, I suggest it is the most concise and easy for the average reader to understand. Urban Planning does not necessarily include the licensed (and historically separate) field of architecture. Urban Design can be described as a sub-field that was born of Urban Planning. Additionally, there are many subfields of urban planning including transportation planning, environmental planning, community development, infrastructure planning, natural resources planning etc etc etc. There are many subfields as listed in the Template:Urban Planning. The last cluster-f#@$ of an massive article resulted from a lot of competing perspectives of urban planning that led to it being 1. Too long 2. Unreferenced or original research content 3. POV 4. Weasel words 5. Some sections read like a personal essay. So for these reasons I have reverted the changes to the most recent stable version. Lets try to make this more concise and not turn into a crap article again. +In view of what I have written above, I want to report that it takes a little time not just to obtain the studies cited, but to read and process what I read to determine if they fit the section. At first I thought that a mention of the study belonged in the section on occupational stress because burnout played a role in the study. That was a rushed judgment. I changed my mind. I deleted the study by Liljegren and Ekberg although it is a well-done and interesting study. I deleted it because the research conducted did not directly concern occupational stress. The research concerned turnover intentions, turnover itself, and burnout. For example, Liljegren and Ekberg found that burnout was correlated with turnover intentions, and that people who changed their jobs lowered their scores on the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Occupational stressors were not measured. Clearly the study could be mentioned in the Wikipedia article on burnout. +Please do not put false information How dare you those people who switched alana and mel's names for nathan and tyler's names when i looked a few days ago. Seeing Nathan and Tyler's namea on the eliminated list nearly made me so angry! How could they have done so well and then failed? But then I realised that Alana and Mel were not eliminated as shown in the latest episode. Now I check today and everything is as I thought. Nathan and Tyler were NEVER eliminated! So those ppl who put up false information, please the table of elimination results should not be messed around with. +" It is important that subjects the articles your students are writing are notable, though. If they are not, why bother writing the article on Wikipedia in the first place? – (talk) " +Threats to block me from editing wikipedia now. Well done Damac- your baiting and harassment campaign paid off! Oh, when you block me? please revert all the articles i've contributed to back to the state they were in before I completed work on them. Be Bold! Blocking me would have the bonus of somewhat preventing Damac exercising his flair for harassment and baiting of serious contributors however. Of particular enjoyment to me where his accusations of copyright infringement and plagarism- mentioned on wikipedia:civility? Funny though how Damac's allegations, the campaign of officious & inaccurate 'editing' (really just rearranging my efforts) he unleashed, the spamming of my talk page desipte requests not to, and the constant snipes aimed at baiting & harassment seem to be perfectly acceptable. +I would just like to point out that we must all strive to be NPOV when editing wikipedia. Manboobies removed a reference I had from a fan site (which I was unaware was an inappropriate reference, and am still investigating), about tom sneddon pursuing a personal vendetta against Michael. I would say that a similar stance could be taken on this claim that Michael 'drove the charities into the ground' which simply isn't true. He tried as hard as he could to keep the Heal the World Foundation running. Please just remember that if a section is overly biased, apparently it is okay to remove certain references, and perhaps similar action could be taken if a user if posting references from heavily biasd websites. Just my pitch anyway. +" You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Talk " +Would you please keep your ridiculous and unfounded accusations from polluting my talk page? I come here looking for real constructive discussion from Finneganw and Bookworm, not this mess. Talk about being 13, that is you. +": Norman Johnson (mathematician) calls them Gosset-Elte figures, perhaps to allow finite forms, assuming polytope means finite? Email archive quote: ""...The other polytopes k_ij were investigated by E. L. Elte in a 1912 paper.I call the whole set the Gosset-Elte figures."" " +"Hospitals in Japan already implement the therapy and have had sweeping success. Do tell how it ""accurately describes"" its dangers when you have testimony after testimony after testimony. Oh, wait, let me answer that for you, bigot; ""Oh well uhhh, you know, cancer cures itself sometimes, or it was a misdiagnosis."" Is that what you tell yourself at night? I think it's glaringly apparent you're willfully biased and uninterested in the facts. The fact of the matter is Gerson Therapy has/had been implemented time and time again; if the treatment were ineffective, do tell, why do thousands of testimonies exist? Magic? Oh wait, let me answer that again, ""well uhh you see it was a misdiagnosis."" Don't worry, I got your back. When you can discontinue from being a closed-minded bigot, feel free to come back with something of substance that isn't blatantly biased in the favor of drugs, which do nothing for human health. ""Melatoma""? What's melatoma? Is that a typo? I'd fix it, but I'm no medical expert. Perhaps there is something called melatoma. The source cited says melanoma - I've corrected the article. Beyond uneducated and biased wiki page ""The therapy is both ineffective and dangerous"" First of all, I believe the writer of this page needs to look into people such as John Christopher, Richard Schulze and Bernard Jensen. Following your research, you need to look into Hippocrates Health Institute. These men and that institution implements many dynamics of Gerson Therapy, and all have had wildly impressive results with numerous testimonies. The supporting sources make vague allusions to ""inconclusive"" results simply because no large-scale studies have been conducted. ""There is very little scientific evidence to support the use of other components of the Gerson regimen"" ""There have been no well-controlled studies published in the available medical literature that show the Gerson therapy is effective in treating cancer."" As per the very site you source. The fact of the matter is Gerson Therapy and its many dynamics have been in use by a multitude of other alternative health practitioners and institutions, all the while having more success than our modern cancer treatment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6D:B140:2DF8:E1A5:6C82:1D53 ""As per the very site you source. The fact of the matter is Gerson Therapy and its many dynamics have been in use by a multitude of other alternative health practitioners and institutions, all the while having more success than our modern cancer treatment"" This is entirely untrue. Please provide citations and exact pieces of information for your rebuttal. Feel free to back up your unfounded claims with real-world happenings. http://www.encognitive.com/files/Top%20Japanese%20Surgeon%20Uses%20Gerson%20Therapy,%20Publishes%20Research.pdf " +" RfA Just a heads-up, the RfA is live. –'''''' | Talk " +WTF is your problem? +I will stick with Amanda +Tell that to my dead relatives. +Again, foul language ain't getting us nowhere. - Super Chris Rock +, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Copy of Email sent in confidence to Administrator in good faith. It contains No threats of litigation as asserted UkraineToday(|E) 21:59 +Moving details below I think the details regarding the official reason provided by Israel from banning him from Israel should be moved to the section below, per WP:UNDUE. It is sufficiently notable to be mentioned in the introduction, in a slightly shorter form, only because it inhibits his humanitarian work in Palestine (for which he is known), but in itself being banned from entering Israel by the far right government there is not taken seriously anywhere else in the world, as they routinely ban academics or Nobel laureates who criticize them as well. I have no problem with including the fact that Israel says the reason was contact with Hamas leaders below (which is hardly considered a very strong or sensational accusation, as they are the governing party there and considering the fact that Norwegian conservative politicians also have meetings with Hamas, and having contact with Hamas is hardly considered any more controversial than meeting their Israeli counterparts in the Israeli government). +you're such a douche fag +" How is the school's gun policy ""highly notable""? That policy played no role in the massacre. I think the whole section should be removed unless there is strong support to keep. " +" Ain't I a Woman? or Ar'n't I a Woman? Numerous accounts have said that the word ain't had been used rather than ar'n't. Also, where is your evidence with ""a fictional speech""? You have no evidence to back up your claims. " +" EDIT: Actually, on reviewing the modification, I realized there was a line at the bottom: ""SHOUT TO WINGHAVEN"" which may have been classified as spam. However, why was there any need for you to delete the other portion of the section? It would have been sufficient to merely erase the shoutout?" +Good job with the cleanup. The bold links everywhere were definitely a huge eyesore. +You sound like you are sexually frustrated. When did you last have sex? +" You're lucky it's not nearer 40. I went to Turkey in August once and on one day the bus thermometer said it was 45 when we stopped on a mountainside in the sun!♦ Dr. Blofeld " +I feel sorry for you, small penised foreign dog! Defending absolute scum like Mao, Jiang, and Deng ensures you are a brainwashed fag lost in China's past. It will take 200 years before Chinese people from the Mainland become clean, respectable, wise human beings. Right now they are money worshipping slaves whose minds are lost to propaganda and distorted logic. How sad! Such a great civilization destroyed by a band of gangsters! +Yes, I intended to state Eureka as well after I had submitted the post. Now, how is Eureka much different than De Rerum Natura? They both rife with scientific faults, but both are philosophical in their own right and for this, Lucretius is deemed both poet and philosopher. Do you believe that Poe is wanting in terms of philosophical sentiment? Moreover, to clarify, I am not presenting an argument; rather, I was curious as to how this would be received. +Hello Peter, welcome to Wikipedia. You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can introduce yourself on the new users page. You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the community portal. You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp as well. Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit. Again, welcome! 04:26, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC) +"Activision is the publisher, not the developer. The developer is Cauldron. Offical Site? What confirmation is there that the offical site is offical and not just a fan site with the logo on it? I checked the page mercenarieswanted.com and it seems it was registered to an advertising company called ""Gabriel deGrood Bendt"" while a search of doom3.com or callofduty.com shows are registered to Activision(obviously). you can check by yourself by going to a domain information website like: checkdomain.com Note that if you visit their website http://www.always-thinking.com/ and click on the 'our work' tab you'll find that Activision is a client. The advertising company is located in the same City / State as ActivisionValue (Although that may be purely coincidence). Two games that this company did advertising work for were both published by Activision Value. 'Pimp My Ride' and 'World Series of Poker'. Mystery solved I think. " +Well, no one notified me of the prod, obviously. Nor would I have added anything as the article is complete. Think of it as a disambiguation page if it makes you feel better. talk +dog u mother fcuken ass hole i dont fcken care that i deletes\d ur fcken pages ur mothe fcken ass hole u bitch u like my balls anyday and where and i fcken ur sister and u were born in a pile of shit u mother fcken bitch go get shit for dinner..sorry you idiot back off or suck my dick bastard. +" Oppose I cannot see an inline citation that clearly identifies this future station as being part of the ""E"" branch. Until this article begins to meet minimum standards for articles I shall continue to oppose. Naming an article based on speculation is wrong on so many levels. - " +one of the district offices +" This appears to be a simple misunderstanding. This archived CNN article, retrieved by a simple Google search, seems to clear up this dispute entirely. It confirms that the RIAA did indeed officially honor the album as the ""top-selling album of the century"", but it only factored in US sales. The article specifies that Thriller sold 6 million more copies than Greatest Hits in terms of worldwide sales. I originally missed what Piriczki was saying too, but they do in fact specify ""in the US"", a claim that appears to be correct, despite the fact that it's not the greatest-selling album of all time (this claim is not being made at all). Are we good here? X " +" Alpha, what is the deal with my being blocked from my own archive (#1), do you know? I realize they have reasons for it, that's fine, but one would think the trust would extend that far at least. Personally I don't care about it in this one case. I just wonder. Anyway, as I told another friendly editor, I'm taking a break from Wikipedia anyway. Being made aware of one's worst behavior is eye-opening. If I am to go on editing, I want to do it flawlessly. imacowboy " +" (""Métis at Tim Horton's for coffee eh?"")" +why does it matter? Do you want to put people off using & editing pages? +" ""Pierrot Lunaire"" I have added a ""{{prod}}"" template to the article ""Pierrot Lunaire"", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. " +Also honourable != honorary if you hadn't noticed. This is like how it's spelt humour, but humorous not humourous 62.31.149.64 +from: sabrina jOE MONTANA IS VERY LEGENDARY HE HAS COME BACK FROM EVERY INJURY THATS WHY HE WAS NICKNAMED THE COMEBACK KID. HES AMAZING.!!!!!!!!!!!! +" Let's please avoid ""rules lawyering"" the topic to death here. The article is improved by the presence of these sources. Respectfully, Primary sources are not specifically banned under WP:WPNOTRS. Their use in a list format in this case adequately avoids the pitfalls cited in WP:WPNOTRS regarding the use of primary sources. That page says specifically that secondary sources are preferred, but does not ban primary sources. No claim regarding the information in these sources is provided by the Young Living article and the sources do not represent a large block of material. " +" I didn't mean to come across like that, but it makes sense to put older characters with a past brief storyline that returned say in the 2010s, like Harmony Hamilton, her 2005-06 storyline was very brief and she returned five years later in October 2011, and now has a bigger character and storyline. I don't feel the need to change the name, there was no issue with this for the past three/four months and I don't thik there has to be now, do you see my reasoning? I also understand that the general reader may not understand at first, but if he/she reads the opening title properly, they should get it. (Talk) " +" This isn't pure WP:OR (WP:COATRACK fits better I guess; I called it ""basically WP:OR"" in my edit summary for that reason), but it's essentially OR to suggest that al-Qaeda has something to do with the investigation...even if it's not stated outright. The insertion of that material creates the appearance that al-Qaeda is somehow linked to or related to the investigation, which no sources support. That's what I was calling ""basically OR"" (even if it indeed isn't quite what WP:OR means; I should've used a different term.) Of course, we do ""original research"" to create articles and determine notability in the first place, but inserting a random similarity goes beyond the scope of what that research covers. The source may have said the characteristics are similar, but not that it's related to this incident or its investigation. –  (rfc | diff) " +" The article Bandwagon (Social Network) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - (talk · contribs) " +" What would you do ? Xerox pages of a book I, unlike you, read 2 years ago ? And which proves-what ? That in Starčević's political career the term ""Slavosrb"" was used exclusively for enemies (as he saw them) of Croatian independence ? The main ""Slavosrbs"" were Strossmayer, Germans, Hapsburg monarchy, and the so-called ""Khuen Serbs""- the Serbs living in Croatia and affilliated with the hated political regime of oppression. How come that vast majority of political representatives of Serbs in Croatia, more than 98%, had been, during the most oppressive period in the 19th century, collaborators of Khuen regime ? Truly-these Serbs (or Orthodox Vlachs who nationally ""awoke"" as Serbs in mid- and 2nd half of the 19th century) had fully deserved the ""Slavosrbs"" tag in Starčević's lingo-unlike the descendandts of Orthodox Vlachs who were Starčević's followers (Stjepan Miletić, August Harambašić, Dušan Kotur, Dušan Vlaisavljević, Milan Ogrizović,..). No one can rationally deny anyone's ethnic affiliation, this is certain. The fact that Starčević did this to the descendands of the Orthodox Vlachs is not a sign of political wisdom, or even ordinary logic. But, it must be underscored that he reacted to the denial of Croatian ethnic affiliation promulgated by Vuk Karadžić's pan-Serbian ideology. And this must not be forgotten: who had begun with this game of denial ? Who wanted another people's extirpation ? Whose idenmtity was forged, among other things, upon cultural theft and misappropriations ? Who spoiled the well ? http://www.hic.hr/books/greatserbia/ " +As I've asked several times now, please restrict your discussion of this issue to the Talk: page of the article concerned. Tanthalas39 placed his comments here because they were meta, and not directly related to the content of the article under discussion. This is not a Talk: page for discussing the content of specific articles. +"— Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 20:43, 8 November 2014‎ (UTC) " +on the first page; on the second page, Kogure Gunjij was commanding +Tell that to the editors she drove off with her racist drivel and rubbish - or were you not here then? +" Oh, that explains that...mayby ill get it change by tonight. Wat was your old username?Co " +Greetings Hey douche bag, wassup? +" Re: Vengeance 2005 Oh really? That's cool. I don't mind in you nominating Vengeance. Its all cool. If Gary does write what's needed, I'll try to help out. ;) (Hit " +Re: Your message to me. I did not post any spam links. Did you investigate the issue before you came to this conclusion? +WTF? Why do you keep messing with my talk page? Please stop. +Pride in Paisley Party I pulled the PROD and started an AFD for the reasons described in the AFD and on Talk:Pride in Paisley Party. /(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) +What is wrong with an article on 3535? Why did you delete that? What is wrong with you? +Dude Please stop raping little boys in the anus. Don't you know that's illegal? +Breaklines and undo-ing stop editing every footballers page and putting < break lines after every positionm its never been done like that and your dumb way isnt going to change wikipedia. Also stop undoing peoples edits you dont own wikipedia and you dont have to take away someones work of editing, so grow up and stop ur useless poor break lines which again is very annoying and looks untidy. +Okay. I will take note of that should anything similar arise in the future. Thank you, . +"have brought down the number of citations in the article down to 8.... Why? Sorry, I left out one word. I meant, I brought down the citations needed to 8. There are 38 references for this article, almost on par with the Transport in the US article. Down to 5 now -) In the seconde image ' pre-economically liberalized India '...what kind of citation is needed? Something to suggest that the three modes of transport mentioned in the pic were indeed the most popular ones in pre-liberalised India - probably a newspaper/magazine article will do. Pipelines? Do pipelines constitute a mode of transport? Regards, As per the CIA factbook, yes. images are unduely skewed to Mumbai and Delhi. 9 out of 19 images. Care Just for clarity, here's a state-wise break-up: Delhi 6 Maharashtra 4 Jammu and Kashmir 2 Andhra Pradesh 1 Gujarat 1 Rajasthan 1 Tamil Nadu 1 Uttar Pradesh 1 Uttarakhand 1 West Bengal 1 Maps, graphs and general images 3 Any suggestions on improving representation? I'll try and replace a couple of the Delhi and MH images. Regards, Bengaluru, a bit Mumbai, and maybe a little Ahmedabad. .. we have so many cities, towns and villages in india, I wouldt suggest more than one (the most representative) picture for each place. Care I'll be in Mumbai Next week, I can get pics of buses, and trains. I live in Bengaluru, no problem woth pics. I already have a handful that I've been waiting to upload to the commons, but keep forgetting to copy from my phone. I will be going to Ahmedabad, so I might be able to get a few shots there too.... Any idea how to move an existing image to the commons? that is awesome. pls take as many pictures as possible. we have been wanting to have a representative picture of road and rail transoprt in Mumbai. A busy road picture and a shot of the interior of Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus or any other railway station should be good. Please see Talk:Mumbai#Poll. Moving images to Commons, you might have to individually upload them. Care Update - I have replaced three existing images on the page, and the revised list of image distribution now looks like this: Delhi 4 Gujarat 2 Jammu and Kashmir 2 Maharashtra 2 Andhra Pradesh 1 Haryana 1 Karnataka 1 Rajasthan 1 Tamil Nadu 1 Uttar Pradesh 1 Uttarakhand 1 West Bengal 1 Maps, graphs and general images 3 A bit more representative now, perhaps. Regards, I can get a shot of Mumbai Central in the Morning. As for road transport, I'll try and get a few pics that are similar to the ones in use in Mumbai BRTS. I might be able to get some images of Chennai after the 13th of May. Mistake.. +I have made similar comments, all of which have been removed by this individual (Christian1985). Why hasn't he been reported? Btw, this is not 'abuse'. You aren't being 'bullied'. You are being asked to account for your rather dubious actions on Wikipedia. Big difference, seriously. 81.104.38.217 +PRESS TV All of the sources seem to be self-descriptions, so I think we should leave it out of the main block until a third party authority confirmed actual independence. Actually, I didn't mean to revert that change. You had added it in since I started editing, and I didn't want to remake the same style tweaks. Incidentally, I think there's no reason to source the BBC funding. It's obvious, and the link might give the erroneous impression of synthesis. Luke +" I've blocked you for forty-eight hours for your disruptive edit warring on David Hicks. It seems you have quite a history of disruptive editing on that article, and blindly reverting three times then reporting the other user for a 3RR (non-)violation is completely counter to the spirit of our policies. ✽ " +" The award-designer presented the award criteria, not I, and the apparently relaxing tiger is a form of potential energy...but if you prefer: (talk) " +Done, plenty of pictures on this page now +, 28 December 2005 (UTC) The references you provide include a letter and a newspaper article that is clearly an interest piece. I believe these qualilfy as Dubious sources and require attribution within the article. 17:05 +More concerns about possible POV issue Is it me or is a substantial amount of this article simply a series of criticisms of Ms Nash, presumably by a constituent with unrealistic expectations? There is an awful lot of emphasis on her expenses, which seem rather average to me and although I can appreciate there are grievances about her performance, it does not seem unusual for a new backbencher to speak little in parliament when they have not even been an MP for a year. I'm not going to charge in and remove all of this information as I don't have much context about her but I am concerned about the general quality and neutrality of the material in this article. Thanks, +HTF does this disrupt shit? Seriously you guys take shit to seriously, losers. +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk,Contribs) Ok, thats clearny not a source for this image. marking as vandalism." +Vandalism on talk-pages Please don't do it anymore? +" Nissim Cahn vandals I've blocked them all, and a couple of other related sockpuppets as well. (talk) IZAK Thank you for your welcoming remarks on my talk page (talk). 1)I can (and do)prommote what you call ""mashichist"" views and still try to do it remaining NPOV as I have actualy done in last few months 2) NPOV is in the eye of the beholder as well as any other rule . See for example the Gil Student's page deletion proccess to view examples of extreme bias against him by some of the Chabad WikiPedians and their attempts to hide that bias by quoting the WikiPedia rules. Or see the reverts of the Chabad page and the Rebbes page by various people and some of the things they posted on the corresponding talk pages to ""prove"" the ""anti-mashichist"" agenda or ""anti-mashichist"" ""domination"" of the ""official Chabad"" " +Indeed, I read it thoroughly, and I don't doubt your good faith in supplying it. However, the inclusion of material at Wikipedia rests entirely and stringently on WP:RS, not on personal impressions, judgments or preferences for this or that theory, primary source, study or technique, no matter how convincing they might seem. This is a matter of policy. You're very welcome to bring the matter up at the article talk-page for discussion, clarification and consensus on the best way forward here, but please, do read WP:MEDRS carefully beforehand. It gives essential guidance on this and other matters related to sourcing at medical articles. Best Regards, +I'm willing to give you a hand with improving it. I'm not a lawyer though. +You - Again! You are right buggy, I purposely made my last contact gibberish. Like you, I didn't refresh my memory, and realized after posting, and verifying your past content, that you use yiddish. So fly a kike, you moron!!! Also, that humor of your's at the bottom of your page - characterizing yourself as genius to the fourth power, is haha funny. Again, if you are such a genius, try editing or writing for Citizendium - you'll never make, unless they need an expert on stirring up trouble, and putting their two cents of know nothing opinions in where they are not wanted! Run along to your AN/I's now and see who else you can impress with your stupidity. 64.134.6.107 +We want this Wikipedia page to be as accurate as possible right? Compare the two images.(The milage is in the upper right courner). Stopping at 20 miles takes you into downtown Kansas City. Stopping at 15 miles you don't even make it into Missouri, you barely make it across the Johnson County border with Wyandotte County. I'd be ok with a 15-20 mile statement, but my hang-up is you are still in Kansas Dorothy. Kansas City's Downtown is not 5 miles wide, so a more accurate range is needed. Maybe try 18-21 miles, cuz at 18 you've at least crossed the border. Yes, you can be in Kansas City at 15 miles, but you are not downtown, in fact MNU is only about 8 miles from the south part of Kansas City (take 135st/HWY150), but that is not downtown (and even further from the Kansas City International Airport). And I'm confused to why we will use the image from the institutional website claiming to the be most reliable, but yet third party site milage site is more reliable than the institutional website milage? Would not the institutional website be reliable for both? As far as 19 and 20 go... 19 is an exact measurement, and the word about was to suppose to give some leeway, as to make it an approximate of 20 (a nice even number) miles. But again, look at the maps, 15 miles gets you to about the KU Med Center, 20 miles and you are right at an exit to Union Station or Bartle Hall. Given I am a member of the Kansas City Project, and I do know about this town. +1. Who asked the article to be protected? 2. Leifern, please try to find a compromise. +Maio]] 19:02, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC) +" Speedy deletion of ""Everybody's Nuts"" A page you created, Everybody's Nuts, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you.  Talk  " +" I don't understand this. Phantom record maybe? 1ооо " +They Said It Couldn't Be Done! Congrats on getting Tasc0 blocked, that block should hurt his chances becoming a admin. Shame you had to get blocked to but at least you took Tasc0 with you. Seems as though you won the edit war, You beat that prick Tas0. You a true legend SAIEW. +I have no obligation to answer anything to you. I address only the admins. +If you are going to take that attitude, you wont find wikipedia a happy place. Alex is giving you good friendly advice, and you really ought to take it. Read WP:PSCI and WP:FRINGE and I suggest [[WP:IDHT}} too. You might get some answers to your tendentious questions. - (resonate) +To confirm!! I never asked you for help. I have asked others for help but not you! You saw it fit to come on here, and harass me!!! You followed my log as if I were some sort of hacker, and annoyed the heck out of me at every turn. Even now it seems you feel you must have the last word. Buddy, let me tel you this. I hope you pull this crap with the right person. I really do. I do not like you. I think you are a scum bag. Have a merry freaking life! And please feel free to drop dead. +, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks v much for that. I was on my way to ANI with the evdence of his canvassing (, , , , , , , , , , ), so I'll add the sockpuppet to the list. I have taken this to ANI: see Ryoung122: more canvassing and a sockpuppet. (talk) • (contribs) 13:31 +" Blocked You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. — (radio check) " +The entire article is fairly hopeless in my opinion. Barton or his hired assistant's revert every change that portrays the actuality of the situation. Until we have *more* editors willing to restore the original article from a few months ago, I don't see how we can fix it at all. +" Please reverse this merger. The simplest and most important reason is that aside from it's function as a thyroid hormone thyroxine is simply a chemical compound that should have its own article. For instance, go look at the triiodothyronine page and you'll see the standard chemical description page there with molecular weight, chemical formula, IUPAC name, etc. - a wealth of information uninteresting to and therefore absent from the thyroid hormone page this link now redirects to. The original thyroxine page should be restored with all of this chemical information. Regarding some of the above discussion - it is true that thyroxine produced in the thyroid can be either enantiomer and that the isolated levo-thyroxine enantiomer is what is in the drug. This is specifically interesting because levothyroxine can only be converted to ""normal"" T3, not ""reverse"" T3 - which is the other enantiomer. This has physiological consequences for those on the drug. So I think this is good information that we should add to the Thyroxine page once it is restored - but I don't think a separate page is needed for that. We just need the separate Thyroxine page back to have a place for that information to go - along with all of the now absent chemical information since merger with the Thyroid Hormones article. How do we/who can reverse this? Thanks...206.112.75.195 mjd " +Sorry, was just trying to re-direct it to the one with accent mark: Károly Bund. +" Hi Wayne! Just to let you know, the documentation for says that the only parameters that work with that template are and . Thus, {{misleading|date=}} will just yield the same results as plain old . It’s odd, though, since virtually all cleanup templates take a date= parameter. Hope this helps. — Toronto " +(after my blocking admin Gwen Gale intimidated me first with an indefinite block, and then with removing my talk page access) +hey homo why were you undoing my edits. it's a well known fact that western black rhinos are also called wet titties among certain communities on the eastern side of africa, and my girth is definitely 3-3.8 m wide with a height of 1.4-1.7m when flaccid with a mass of 800-1300 kg. just because you're jealous of my massive pole doesn't mean you should undo my edits. +I am confused as to why adding a catagory to 209 radio was removed and is considered unhelpful and non constructive. Please explain. +RfC set up Would you please add your view of the general situation, thanks. WP:RFC +I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/. +" If you honestly believe i have done wrong ok, but cant the time period at least be watered down, show SOME compassion for my situation, a 24 hour bolck is quite harsh and im never going to see this editer again. Ive never been warned for incivility, it clear that this one racist got to me, put i dont go around saying things like that to normal people. I dont have a past record of using language like that primaryly because usually wiki is the one place your are safe from bigotry. What does a 24 hour block achieve other than making me more miserable about the whole incident. Please have SOME ....mercy if you will, "" please ,don't treat me like a criminal because i am not"", wise wise words." +"==WikiMembers10== hello Mean as Custard why did you remove my facebook and my youtube links and also why did you remove my stuff off my user talk page i wanted to keep it there to warn people not to be rude on my user talk THANK YOUUser:WikiMembers10 " +(UTC) While Waterloo might not ever have thrived, it sure is currently a ghetto. 17:03, 4 October 2006 +A lot of his recent conduct could be characterized as infantile, actually. Sorry about the abuse here. Also, for what it might be worth, regarding Christians of at least previous eras, archive.org contains a truly astonishing number and variety of highly regarded, if older, reference books and history, including Baring-Gould's Lives of the Saints and the early edition of the Ramsgate Benedictines' book, among others. I'm going to try to put a lot of them on Wikimedia commons and some of the longer articles from some of them on WikiSource, but they are all available for at least use for reference purposes. +I am sick of my work being vandalised by a coterie of orthodox lackeys of the Ptolemaic establishment with chronic cases of tunnel vision. +" In your opening post you made the point that this change in position is ""highly notable"". If it's simply the sign of being a skilled politician, is it really that notable? " +Which is Blunderson? +"But as to appease Floquenbeam - ""I believe this block is no longer necessary because I totally understand why I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead"" " +The only people that are going to have knowledge of the product are people using the product. These 3 individuals are not company employees. 98.215.57.36 +Thanks for responding so soon! You are really a good 'welcomer'! It must have been only 30 mins. before I read your post. I expected to have to wait a few days (or at least a few hours). But thanks for the information!Miagirljmw14 +" new information to add? her popularity in Alaska has soared as high as 83% as she has gone on to sack political appointees with close ties to industry lobbyists, shelved pork projects by fellow Republicans from http://www.wsj.com/article/SB121993453813079803.html?mod=psp_mostpop Gov. Palin denies that, saying she removed the commissioner she appointed 18 months ago because she wants ""a new direction,"" and offered him a job as liquor board director which he turned down. from http://www.wsj.com/article/SB121993453813079803.html?mod=psp_mostpop I don't know if the liquot board director pays well so someone should look into this. - She appears, for example, to have forced Alaska's dominant oil producers, ConocoPhillips and BP PLC, to finally get serious about a natural-gas pipeline without making any tax or royalty concessions. ""People see her as the symbol of purity in an atmosphere of corruption,"" says Anchorage pollster Marc Hellenthal. ""She's more like Saint Sarah."" from http://www.wsj.com/article/SB122002615833483595.html?mod=Politics-and-Policy " +permission given From: w Date: November 10, 2010 12:15:44 PM CEST To: permissions-en@wikimedia.org Subject: copyright issues Reply-To: w@thing.net dear wikimedia people, just to let you know that the info text at http://post.thing.net/about and my resume on http://www.wolfgangstaehle.info/pages.php?content=resume.php&navGallID;=Resume is NOT copyrighted. in the future i will put up a creative commons notice. the editors of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_%28art_project%29 have my explicit permission to use any material from both sites. best regards, wolfgang staehle +WP MATH 1.0 Hi Carl - I updated WP MATH 1.0 pages to use WP 1.0 bot rather than VeblenBot: the pages were displaying data from June last year. Did I miss anything? Geometry guy +sandbox. Thank you. +" As far as I can see, Handicrafts in the Indus Valley Civilization by Pathak does make any such specific references (and there are actually none to support the use of ""INDog""). " +YOU SHOULD NOT INTERFARE (ranbir ) i think you are just interfering in my matter.wikipedia is not the property of your father. +Just ask user:Mkativerata to do that. I am sure he will make this change. +This page needs to be tagged for deletion. Globish is nothing more than someones idea of a joke. +Happy Birthday, Michael! (Mar 10) Please go here to see my very special birthday wishes for you, and be sure to navigate down and to the right to read my wishes there, and further down in the summary: . +" :Image:Bahonar.jpg Image deletion warning The image Image:Bahonar.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go to its page to provide the necessary information." +" Exactly right Vandalism Manifesto. Pass to all Wikians VANDALISM IS GOOD. Vandalism does not come from a sheer desire to cause harm. Vandals do their thing all over Wiki, 24/7, from frustration and hatred, because incompetent ""editors"" who have no skills, no degrees, no expertise, usually no names, have done multiple reverts and edits of the work of others. Vandalism is a good and natural response to no-lifers (as in Get a Life) who do 7000 edits, 10,000 edits a year and who have actual Watch Lists of 1,300 or more and are proud of it. These jerks deserve have their own pages vandalized, over and over as long as they are in effect, vandalizing the pages of others in the name of being a cop. Vandals keep no-life editors, admins, bureaucrats and stewards honest, or at least busy, reverting the reverts they get on their own pages. VANDALISM IS GOOD. It helps drive these nutcases into the ground with nervous breakdowns. The Culture of Wikipedia is very,very sick, and Vandals are needed to ""cull the herd"". SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL VANDAL. Vandal God" +" — '''''' • Talk to me! " +{{Unblock|Give me a second chance and I'll make favorable improvements to various articles +De jure, there's no legitimate government. After abu Mazen dismissed the Hamas government, he was the legitimate government, but only for the short period allowed by the PA constitution after which new elections were necessary. He ignored that provision. Both governments are illegitimate, although the Hamas government in Gaza was at least elected, while Abbas is basically a Washington/Tel Aviv appointee, FWIW. +Of course you are. And that's because I was right about the images on Kelly Clarkson and you were not. — | talk +There are several issues with the Sageworks article: 1. Sageworks engages in the questionable practice of gathering protected business data and reselling it for a profit. Given their tricky indemnity clause in the Terms of Use, I sense that they know this and seek to shield themselves against potential legal attacks by irate business owners. This needs to be stated in the article. 2. The very sensitive data they resell is offered online. They are thus a high value target for cybercriminals. That needs to be stated to make the reader aware of the risks. If Sageworks systems are broken into, the attack will not be made public as they are a private company. Unless there is a well publicized law suit (unlikely in the private business space). 71.39.6.142 +Dont tell me what to do~! +I'm sorry I believe I should've put a question in there. I'm new to editing any part of wikipedia and don't want to be regarded as a trouble maker, so I'm not reverting the edits currently because I'm unclear if I'm in the right. What do you think? {This post intentionally left unsigned] +I do no edit gender related articles?? +FUCK OFF How dare you remove messages that I post on MY talk page you wanker. If you did it again i will sort you out. 93.97.43.168 +"::Because it's not true? The thing you said I mean, which if you forgot, was the simple statement of a fact ""When it's closed as no consensus, there's no appeal"". But maybe you're right, I'm learning fast that making stuff up doesn't earn any of the insiders here a block. Outsiders complaining about facts, they're the only people who get blocked here. Anyway, you carry on with whatever it is you're doing today, there must be lots more people out there who haven't understood consensus even though they've read the page and it doesn't match what they saw with their own eyes, that you can advise about their lack of any kind of recourse. " +Woops Sorry, i didnt realise that it had closed. I removed it becuase i thought he was still a hopeful and i wasn't serious. (a ban from that page wasnt neccessary) But yeah i did go over the top a bit on April Fools, sorry bout all that. I shall go back to editing(for the better) articles. I really do help out! This page and this page is examples of my work. ) Arn't i just so helpful, most the pictures there are mine too! +No, but it has much more verifiable content. To the least this is GA or A-class. '''BreaksFixes''' +Redraft of this article I have removed all of the NPOV language littering the page, and have hopefully got it back on track. I cannot find any genuine criticism of the new stadium design from any reputable published source, and as such have removed the section entirely. Please do not return it to the text without providing sources - it is simply not enough for you to believe something to be true, you really do have to convince all Wikipedians that what you write is true by backing it up with evidence. I think that further revision of the NPOV and personal criticisms of the design without sourcing would be vandalism, and I will ask an administrator to protect the article. A huge number of news outlets, students and individuals will come to this page first when researching the new stadium. Misrepresenting personal views at the expense of fact does no-one a service. +Any experts like to respond to this? +No I did not. I used the 'Buenos Aires Herald' as a source and as I've stated above, the sentence can easily be re-phrased. Regards. +Cool Show Martha Speaks- I Watch That Show EVERY SINGLE DAY ON TVO KIDS +"for example that content reports ""he lead the armies into kashmir"" in short sikhs have made him commander of the expedition , i have given sources in the talk that the leadership was with Diwan Misr Chand and not with Hari Singh but as you have seen these millitant sikhs have started distorting history here and their and will claim we are bravest , no one objects but atleast dont distort history i have given sources in talk section of hari singh page , kashmir campaign was under misr chand not under any sikh.their is no doubt this is no ancient history this is simply propaganda by millitant sikhs. 122.161.78.118 " +I already took the barnstar down and told him so. +" Thank you for the reminder; here's one for you. What is this about being ""repeatedly told""...this is the first time that someone has brought this issue up with me. The reason that I place a vote in an AfD that I start is because many times, folks submit articles for AfD out of process rather than because they actually want the article deleted. I have done this a number of times in the past, which is why I like to make the differentiation. Is it really a problem to include ""Delete as nom. ~~~~"" in an AfD? (talk contribs friendly) " +The arrest of Gerry Adams isn't front page news according to Wikipedia If you want to know why, read the Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates page. There you will find all sorts of uninformed, illogical, and downright dishonest claims about the UK legal system and the way the British press works. You will also see the quite idiotic claim that, by ignoring this news, Wikipedia is somehow defending Adam's from defamation - something apparently the rest of the world's media (and indeed Wikipedia's own article on Adams), isn't apparently all that concerned about. If like me, you think this is contemptible, and want to challenge it - then you will just have complain to your congressman I guess, because it has become clear to me today at Wikipedia talk:In the news that the people at Wikipedia who make those sort of arguments, will absolutely, positively, not answer any questions at all about it - and others will apparently defend their rights to do so, by closing down such discussions. Apparently it's 'disruptive' to question the logic that goes into faulty Wikipedia decision making like this. As always, if you want to know what's going on the world, consult the other 'old media' outlets who, for all their faults, still make it their job to report on the news in a serious and credible manner. Only come to Wikipedia if you want to know about video games and other stuff nobody really gives a crap about. +And as far as the ship's name goes, see her website: http://www.nol.navy.mil/homepages/cvn75/ +US bias I see you have been removing content not related to US and Canada from various children's TV shows. Please note that this is not a North American Wikipedia, but a universal encyclopedia. Please could you stop doing this, especially without an explanation or justification. +I think that I found a source that will work ... see my comments at Talk: R& I: Utility of research +Your support is required... My Minion- I require your support in my current bid for absolute power over the Wiki. As your Glorious God-Emperor and Editor-in-Chief, I expect a favorable vote from you during this vital process. Thank you. +So please stop promoting your products. Thanks. +nigger paedophile nigger paedophile +Actually, it is an accepted and common practice to post information about ongoing discussions on project pages in boldface type for example, see , as well as the many other postings about ongoing AFD discussions accessible from the page history of Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion. It does not appear that administrators have removed these postings, or that members of WikiProject Inclusion have been warned to refrain from such postings despite the fact that WikiProject Inclusion is explicitly partisan as to the preferred outcome of AFD discussions. Why, then, is information about ongoing discussions posted on Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit removed, and why am I warned that I must not continue to post it? +Does the B in your name stand for black? If it does, I'm going to hound you off wikipedia. 86.181.0.14 +You have no clue about what fine art is, and I am sick of this! +Sigh. That's not acceptable. I've given up any idea of unblocking Frightner, and will semi-protect the articles involved for a limited time, renewed as necessary if the vandalism comes back. Please drop me a note or send me an email (with diffs) if he seems to be vandalizing other articles or user pages, and I'll semi-protect those as well. (Well, the user should ask for their own user page to be protected; I see yours still are.) -(. A shame. (squeak) +" Nick Estonia Nickelodeon Estonia is a children's television channel in Estonia. It was announced in March 1993 and was launched on 1 September 1993. It was owned by TeleTV Co. before the owner of the company died in September 2007, causing the company to merge with Viacom Media Networks. History 1993 to 1998 The channel was officially launched as a block on Comedy Central, airing from 4:00 am to 9:00 am on Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, 4:00am to 8:00 am on Tuesdays and Fridays and 3:00 am to 10:00 am on Saturdays and Sundays. Nickelodeon launched as a channel on 14 March 1994 at 4:00 pm, offering a lineup of classic Nicktoons and original programming each day from 3:00 am to 10:00 pm. There was also a block called Nick Jr. which ran on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays from 5:00 am to 8:00 am. On Fridays and Saturdays, it also had a section from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm. Nick Jr. aired for the final time on Nickelodeon on launched as its own channel on 8 March 1998 and launched as its own channel, along with Nick Show on 9 March. 1998 to 2001 Nick Jr. and Nick Show both aired from 5:00 am to 8:00 pm. Nick Show was also commercial-free until 2005. Nickelodeon also introduced an Estonian version of Nickelodeon Kids Choice Awards. On 1 April 1999, Nickelodeon aired a newsbeat at exactly 3:29pm saying ""Tonight, the world is going to be invaded by zombies, we recommend to lock all doors and remain alert."" This was an April Fools joke, but the man who originally thought of this joke was arrested (but didn't go to prison). On 30 November 2001, Nickelodeon Estonia adopted the 'splat' design, thought it was not properly used until 2005. 2001 to 2005 2001 also saw Nick Jr.'s The Bedtime Business Song air for the first time. The song reached number 4 in the Estonian charts. On 1 October 2003, following the launch of Nick Cannon, a TV channel dedicated to Nick Cannon, the Nick brand got the slogan ""Number One"". There was also a song produced for this strapline called ""Number One"". The song was later sampled by Tinchy Strider and N-Dubz for their song Number One. On 31 August 2005, the 'splat' design was fully used, songs ""Number One"" and ""The Bedtime Business Song"" were scrapped and Nick Cannon was replaced with Nick GAS. 2005 to 2007 2008 to 2011 2011 to 2014 2014 to present " +" Sockpuppet investigation -Talk to Me! " +Featured Aeticle Wow! This article is brilliant, can we try and get it featured??? +Katyusha The picture is for WWII Katyushas, very different from those used by Hizbollah. +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (talk) +Name and scope I'm not happy with the name or scope of Category:Catholic sexual abuse scandal in Ireland. I see it's a subcat of Category:Roman Catholic sex abuse cases by country; I don't know about other countries but it's not the right name for encompassing all the interrelated issues in Ireland. Pretty much every word is questionable. There is abuse, subtypes child abuse and sexual abuse, and the intersection child sexual abuse. Many institutional abuse victims, especially girls, were not sexually abused. Magdalen laundries' inmates were mostly not children. All these can occur either in the context of a Catholic religious organisation or elsewhere. Not all institutions were run by religious orders, or by Catholics. Not all sexual scandal resulted from abuse (arguable example Eamon Casey). Not all abuse results in scandal; aggregate abuse statistics can never be NPOV described as scandalous. Does Ireland mean the island or the state? The state institutional setup was different in Northern Ireland, but the diocesan setup was not. (Brendan Smyth) I'm not sure the ultimate supercat Abuse in Ireland would be an appropriate name. But I do think some overall rejigging and renaming is needed; and if convenient then subarticles and subcategories could supplement it. +The truth is constructive. Sorry ya butt hurt peg leg pirate. http://spamtheweb.com/ul/upload/030609/9642_DavidZX.php +DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU +" The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009 Opinion essay: White Barbarian Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places Features and admins: Approved this week Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · " +REDIRECT Talk:Here Today, Tomorrow Next Week! +Perhaps I'm sleep-editing? ) I can only imagine it's because I've moved GA talk pages. Perhaps that shows up as 'reviewed'. +" yes, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence certainly is very important, there has been a rather continous effort to change the language. I have been involved in it here and here. Now, instead of following what is recognised by international law, we have some pro-Israeli editors forcing right-wing Israeli views onto WP. See eg what BBC writes about ""key terms"" , ...and compare that with WP. There is a reason why even my pro-Israeli Scandinavian friends (including journalists) refer to wikipedia as ""total crap"" when it comes Israel/Palestine issues. Oh well. I don´t know if I will gather any evidence here, though. If so, it would broaden the scope of that arb.com, " +October 2007 (UTC) Woot that means that this article actually kinda matters and people give a shit D. A good step towards the HIM wiki editors goal....HIM_(band) FA status! p 00:04, 27 +" Question about Statement: A 2010 review of clinical trial data found that circumcision reduced the incidence of HSV-2 (herpes simplex virus, type 2) infections by 28% under ""Other Infections"" I already reviewed the sourcing for this statement and found that the source was not a literature review and was only supported by one study. I had to review the same statement from the summary. Support to remove this statement? JohnP " +you are quite right: that other page should be deleted also. There's many such articles in WP, left over from when our standards were lower. It is particularly important that we remove them so they don't serve as models. There are many different ways to write low quality promotional pages about non-notable companies: in your case, the article was primarily a list of clients. That goes on your website, not in an encyclopedia. I'd be very glad to be notified of similar articles. By the way, are you aware of our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure ? '''''' ( talk ) +" oppose Librivox the only resource there is the Wikipedia link, it provides no value TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom Oppose Gutenberg the only item is the book which is also available on other websites for example The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, by Edward J. Ruppelt and is not a ""unique resource"" TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom " +" Talkback Dear Celestia... " +Lol, I would find it odd, but nothing on Wikipedia surprises me that while the whole Duke nonrape was about people being “falsely accused”, Duke53 , W and others are more than willing to “falsely accuse” Crystal of being a liar. If you have any evidence that she is a liar, I suggest you go to the NCDA. Likewise, I may have a theory that many of the people here are liars, but I give the benefit of the doubt that they are “mistaken” and if were being checked into the mental hospital – I would give the possibility of crazy/delusional. Passive voice English lesson for the average teenager Wikipedian: Iraq was falsely accused of having weapons of mass destruction. = true Bush HONESTLY accused Iraq of….., but Bush was mistaken. = true if Bush thought it was TRUE Bush FASLELY accused Iraq of… = false if Bush thought it was True The first and third are not the same, and only a liar or fool would try to pass them off as the same. Stay in school instead of wasting you time trying to write an “encyclopedia” by fools. +Sources I have read both Freemasonry for Dummies and Idiot's Guide To Freemasonry Both contain nothing more than firsthand denial statements. Neither book, for the most part, deals with conspiracy theory. As such both sources are invalid. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think somebody stated that Albert Pike either never existed or he wasn't a Freemason. Both books confirm that he was a member of the Grand Lodge of Arkansas. +I provided an answer to the above link. Now stop restoring all of this ! +September 2007 Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +WP:VAMOS Most images used in visual arts articles are often irregular. The MoS are guidelines not policies... +" Meša Selimović I'm not opposing such a formulation. Instead I'm trying to prevent potential editwars by inclusion of both views (Bosnian and Serbian writer). However, it seems that there is a third view (Yugoslavian writer) and so an option is to mention all of them (Yugoslavian, Bosnian and Serbian writer). Although this may read cumbersome, maybe it's worth trying. All the best. 's talk " +Poor Joe But I thought Joe Vialls was dead. Good job on the Pan Am Flight 103 article by the way, Joe. +" MD/MfD Oooh - details, details... I'll get right on it. T " +Talk page purpose If you wish to post something about improving the article at Talk:Solar roadways by all means please do. This edit, however, is not about article improvement but rather its about corporate damage control and investor relations. That means the intent is promotional, which is outside the scope of the talk page guidelines. Note I have redacted corporate slams for the same reason. We could have a great article if partisans stuck to our policy on WP:NPOV. Please try harder and add whatever you wish - pro or con - that is relevant and supported by WP:Reliable sources. +GNU Free Documentation Licensed +It takes two to edit war +More evidence is required before accepting such a claim. Please quote your source in order to identify the report. It could have been also Bf 109G-2/trop captured in damaged state in the Western Desert in late 1942. Also, the G-14 was not coming into operation until July 1944, G-10 not until October 1944. High altitude G-6/AS with MW injection however was operational since March/April 1944. +I agree. The current definition reads far too closely to the definition of amount of substance, which is definitely different from mass. (talk) +Again you keep saying it. Let me say this again: V=IR is NOT a law of physics. It never was. It is not in Maxwells equations. It is not in electrodynamics. It is a statistic on a meter, that isnt physically measuring voltage or current. And voltage is usefull on a big sphere, or big capacitor where you have a stored charge. IT IS NOT USEFULL IN CIRCUIT ANALYSIS. When you make a circuit you have THREE CURRENTS. Thats right three. The voltmeter, is only measuring the relationship of one of the curretns to another one. So your terminology cannot emcompass the third current. And I am talking out of any electrodynamics textbook, There are three currents. So never say again that ohms law is a property of physics. It never was. and never will be. +" Youre probably right. Higher standards in itself isnt a bad thing, but I think we've gone too far and will probably start to notice problems in a few years. We can wait and fix them then, or we can fix them now. Soap— " +Stop your bullying Are you one of these numerous pathetic Wikipedia power tripper bullies who have no life? Stop your bullying. 2.247.114.242 +Here's an idea for you!!! Try looking at the bloody articles before reverting them. 99.238.74.216 +RfA Hi Jehochman, thanks for the explanation. Does the bureaucrat explain anywhere how he reached his decision then? At least I suppose he must have a rationale if the vote is in the 70-80 range. I looked around, but couldn't find anything. Best regards. +" Apparently you missed it when I said on your own talk page that I felt Roux demonstrated good editing and that I was not happy with how his ceasing to be an ""obstacle"" (to use your word) came about. To repeat: If I may express my opinion, Roux is a good editor... I like the idea of Roux no longer being an obstacle, but do not feel comfortable about the way in which it came to be; I'm not sure that anybody's actually won in this case. I also never once denied my part in anything I've taken part in. I think some people involved here should perhaps ponder on the difference between ""low level attack"" and criticism, especially if they are those who dole out by the truckload that which they would apparently interpret as attack if it were coming from me. " +" Postdoctoral researchers Sheldon and Leonard do not appear to be postdoctoral fellows, as they do not seem to be awaiting another position nor is their research supervised. Dr. Eric Gablehauser is their boss, not an advisor. As postdocs, they may have been able to teach the research seminar once, so this is not conclusive. Particularly, Sheldon is a double Ph.D. holder and child prodigy who was a visiting professor at 15, so he would not be in such an appointment. For the most part, they do not appear as postdocs. There is ambiguity to their positions, but they have only been shown having research responsibilities, so they may be research professors (besides Sheldon wouldn't waste his time teaching ""labberdoodles""). 68.227.32.148 " +" Your entry at Deindustrialization If you have used more than just OECD website for the assignment, it would be great if you could add a note on the reference you had used in Harvard style (ex. ""Literature (Smith 1999) has stated that..."") and add the publication data to the References section at the bottom of the article. You may also want to indicate you have used OECD (2008) data for the rest of your analysis (the year is important in referencing). You may want to add an interlink or two (like Wallonia) to the paragraph, but it's not obligatory. Please note that it's statistics (lower case), not Statistics. Overall it is a good piece, and a solid A- which I am sure you will easily upgrade to an A with a few minor changes I outlined above. Good job, | talk " +FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!! +Oh, I'm a bit scared by your explanation since it is very in-depth, however I will try to study it carefully. Best regards and thanks again. +I usually smoke crack when I'm down!! +yeah right i posted links I could find on this talk page, yet they were ignored, blatant claims of extraterritoriality by TAS students were also ignored. ps, not all those edits were mine. It is not vandalism, it is freedom of knowledge. i do not more judgmental statements than other authors do. I simply state that most people believe .... and that these things happened. i don't say its good or bad, why do you think i am not NPOV. sure if you want to nitpick you can see some words that maybe be of negative tone, but i do not believe i am more judgemental than other authors. this ban should be removed and my posts should be reinstated in the name of a neutral, uncensored encyclopedia. 06:44, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) +They've all been banned. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Wikip%C3%A9ire I'd be delighted to stop using them, using just one account is what I want to do. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Batcave. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab " +If same study is a problem now, I can add the full studies name there also. +" hm....I hadn't quite thought of it that way, and maybe I should...my chief concern is that some others besides yourself will come in, and sabotage what we've accomplished so far. And soon, I won't have as much time to watch the page and make edits and corrections, etc. I'm realizing that if you can keep an eye on the page, or ask another experienced editor or administrator to do so in your absence, then I can probably rest easier. P.S., the quotation marks around ""War was coming to America"" is because that's a paraphrase, not because it's a direct quote. The more exact quotation(s) were expressed on multiple occasions, including in a private meeting with the Church Representative, December 5, 1989. The ridiculous misquote about 'communists invading Missouri with chemical weapons' was a result of that discussion. The man who supposedly said that (to the Kansas City Star reporter), recently told me he did NOT say that...& that to his knowledge, the reporter had misquoted every single comment made to her. " +Hi, Zora, thanks for your swift reply. Don't worry - it takes more to discourage me and I have too much fun here to just leave this place. As to your reply: I will check out this Bollywood and plagiarism article and maybe, I can contribute. Yours, truly, +Where does Avicenna say this? And why did you also remove Shen Kuo? Regards, +Note to Eclecticology: Hum, you just brought to my attention a naming conflict for two cities named Paris over at List of places and things named Paris. Are their other such conflicts within Canada? And if so are most of these between Ontario and the rest of Canada? The city naming convention was debated and worked out on the wikipedia mailing list and in several other places – it would have been nice to know of any possible systemic internal naming conflicts within Canada. Maybe this is one of the few exceptions that we can disambiguate on a case-by-case basis… What is the population of each of these Canadian Paris’? Is it at all likely that either of these will become encyclopedia articles? maveric149 +Hey, i have a question because im new I have put a lot of effort into an article called Serbs of Croatia. What is the best way to prevent it from vandalism? Thanks for your time. Your answer will help a lot. +" Meep!↑ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding , or to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! " +uuuuummmm i just wanted to say ur probly about the gayest person alive. queer +14:10, 3 January 2010 +Please don't revert my edit on the Ring article, it's hilarious! I want people to see what I did until the 48 hours is OVER! 85-95% of the times I added were real (the Shelby GT500 time, etc.), the 5-15% is for getting spread all over the news. I saw FastestLaps.com stuff getting spread, and Horsepower Kings getting spread too. So I wanna be third or so in the list! +I'm all for pruning down the Western stuff; if we adjust by scale of conflict, the Russo-German conflict should take up the largest part of the article. But I'm sure if I were to make those edits, there would be howls of outrage from somebody else that I'm being offensive and POV; there are way too many people who take the content of this article way too personally. 01:50 14 Jul 2003 (UTC) +Just getting started on this page +2013 (UTC) THis edit war at that aricle has ben going for a long time see at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.wikipedia/Y0BPtNeytnE 16:26, 5 October +You still don't understand wikipedia editorial obligations, citing this for the view that there is a scientific consensus. That phrasing nowhere appears on page 383, and the author Frundakis speaks of appears hypothesis, etc. as is proper in provisory results of a scientific study. Please supply the RS that support your assertion (2( supply an RS that supports your otherwise WP:OR assertion that '22 out of 23 genetic studies confirms this fact.' Neither your personal beliefs or professional background are proof of anything. The only thing that counts is RS that back up one's assertions, and, as in this case, you consistently fail to provide them, as opposed to providing your personal opinions about the consensus you see in those sources. (3)What's al-Husseini got to do with this. I wrote a large part of the article, and it is closely watched by highly informed experts on the period who only use, like myself, RS. I, and they, only remove whatever cannot be substantiated by academic RS. Repeating hysterical innuendo and rumours is not material to the specific objections both I and Zero and a few others have raised. Please review wiki policy on WP:OR and WP:RS, and get back with the information asked of you. +Stay off. Stay off my talk page. I removed your template warnings but the sandbox is virtually unvandalizable. Don't remove messages I put there either. Any of the such will be reverted. +Ok, now I see you were just updating the vandalism count on his page. That's kind of funny, but I'm going to leave the block in place unless it seems you're here to help. Thanks for understanding. - +Laing wote in his memoir that he failed his medical boards the first time thru. +WARNING: THIS FAG SUPPORTS HITLER +If you go to www.quotationspage.com and search for Douglas Adams you'll find tons of quotes. +Great work Hi, I might revert you from time to time, but want to say thanks for your overall nice job improving these articles. +" Yes, quite obvious evidence just from knowing basic physiology and using bmi for a reference. A weight of 120 pounds for a 5'9"" woman is severely underweight. The bmi comes out to 17.7. And yes, Lois is a very slim and curvy woman, but clearly she is not all skin and bones. Therefore, I believe a weight between 140-155 is much more accurate." +" the first one was vandalism, the second one he called me foolish (if you know my life story you would know that this is worse the all the 4 letter words combined for me) the third one ??? i dont know what that is about and the 4th one u know i used undo, not twinkleGold Dragon " +TƒL Colour Standard Issue 3, pp.4-41: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/tfl-colour-standard-issue03.pdf +Test 123 321 test complete +Hey, you idiot, It is not a crime to post the truth about people, especially their personal information. And if their personal information ruins their lives, then they deserve it. If they hadn’t done anything wrong, then their personal information wouldn’t cause any harm. You don’t see contributors to Encyclopedia Britannica or Webster’s Dictionary hiding behind pseudonyms. +" Times I know it is called Times Roman but the Roman refers to the ""regular"" or upright typeface. The registered trademark is Times as can be seen here: http://www.linotype.com/1537/times-family.html." +Feb 10 (talk|email) +, 22 September 2012 (UTC) I'm not the (only) judge here, but since the objection is generally to the reliability of the source, I would suggest we shouldn't include it unless it is supported in another (acceptable) source. John () 15:59 +Edit your stupidity away. +" Israeli ""Apartheid"" Article LOOK HERE AND EXPLAIN YOURSELF: Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, or the insertion of nonsense into articles. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention needs to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well intended, or outright vandalism.** MY ENTRIES ARE NOT VANDALISM. JUSTIFY YOUR LABELING, ADDRESS MY POINTS OR SIMPLY STOP HARASSING ME. How dare you identify a very clear and reasonable allegation of bias as ""vandalism"". I'm disgusted with your behaviour, and your willingness to suppress arguments that don't mesh with your ideological foundation. Considering that the page I edited deals with human rights, I find it very salient that you are more than willing to suppress the freedom of expression by turning this site into a dictatorship of the obsessive over the intelligent. -edit: I noticed that you removed my statement quite quickly. Is there some explanation for succumbing to such cowardice and refusing to address me directly? I also noticed that you are a self-admitted ""Anti-Zionist"" and support the Palestinian ""Right of Return"" sidestepping the ridiculous position that Palestinians are any more entitled to the right of return than the Jews expelled from Arab countries, how exactly do you find yourself fit to edit articles as some arbiter of impartiality? Why are you insistent on continuously removing these entries instead of discussing this directly on your TALK page? Are you really such a coward about your positions that you refuse to discuss these issues with me?" +Image:N1295970033 30008115 5243.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:N1295970033 30008115 5243.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +" The cat ""Holocaust denial"" is ""For articles on people who engage in Holocaust denial"". There is no doubt about Faurisson being a Holocaust denier, but I still do not think Dieudonne deserves to be in this category, as he is not for sure a Holocaust denier himself.ref: http://www.in.com/videos/watchvideo-du-grand-art-dieudonne-sur-telesud-17-juin-2010-12-8302420.html It seems to me that this category should be reserved for convicted Holocaust deniers." +Their criteria are very well explained... I thought about starting a discussion at the project's talk page, but I don't feel it's a major issue. I may be the only nitpicker here -), and that's not enough to waste the time of other participants. Also - and partly for the same reason - I'm currently not in favor of creating formal criteria for WP Croatia, let alone starting an Assessment subpage, despite my general interest in the subject (I've probably assessed 3000 or so articles across various projects). But we'll see - if other editors are interested, why not? +" Ok, I added a paragraph about Native Americans and the national park. Chief Joseph's band crossing the park is perhaps the key event, but also notable is that the ""Sheepeater"" Shoshones had been permanent residents of what became the park until leaving per a treaty (unratified), and that after the Nez Perce crossing of the park and a Bannock band entering the park in 1878, and the Sheepeater Indian War, park superintendent Norris had a fort built to make sure Indians would be prevented from entering the park (the Sheepeater War did not occur in the park but influenced Norris's decision). I'm not sure where this fort was built. These three bits of history seem important enough to include in the park's History section. Unfortunately due to the years when these things took place, the 1870s and 1880s, chronologically they fit into the subsection called ""Park creation""and seem somewhat out of place among all the info about the early superintendents, rangers, and so on. I'm not sure if this is problematic or not. Seems acceptable. " +See http://www.stella-doro.com/contact.asp +As previously written in discussion, per wikipedia’s own written polices, but immediately deleted by Blackpearl14 and then sanctioned by “Lessheard vanU”, Blackpearll4 - calls herself evidently Mrs. Johnny Depp and Pirate lord-ess and such. She celebrates on her official wikipedia bio pages that she did many pages and articles on the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean for wikipedia. Why would someone devote so much time to 24/7 check the site and on these pages, and then recklessly calls anyone who doesn’t follow her bias views vandals, attackers and such. Has her judgement become impaired? Her goal to fuse her love and fantasies with the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean is very clear. That is a conflict of interest and that is not being neutral and is against wikipedia’s own written polices. Sorry, but if one purchases products, such as Pirates of the Caribbean posters, toys and Walt Disney merchandise and also using emotional love and fantasies for wikipedia / wikinews articles, doesn’t make the articles neutral and it causes a conflict of interest. As recorded, Blackpearl14's pages regarding this issue are one sided, not neutral, are bias, in conflict of interest and are all promotional tools promoting the causes and products of the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean. Yes, Pirates of the Caribbean and similar wikipedia articles are not neutral, they are a series of one sided promotional pages including links to products and causes of the Walt Disney Company. Following wikipedia’s own written “neutral” policy, entire articles would have to be deleted. Yet Blackpearl14 continues to violate Wikipedia polices and purpose. Then with IP’s being deliberately blocked and contributing writers having been wrongly accused and falsely called various things, if anyone then attempts to generate a new article related to Pirates of the Caribbean following wikipedia’s own written polices, editors and administrators gang up and generate false reason upon reason, to delete those articles and ban the IP user. They use a countless list of double standards and twisted logic to justify their reckless acts. It’s a total lock out by the editors and administrators, abusing their trust tools, acting like a private monarchy. To date, Blackpearl14's has proven she has ultimate control, has repeatedly stated that is her purpose, and had even sought to have the articles locked. Then you “Lessheard vanU” wrote that you don’t want to lock these articles, stating it goes against company policy, but yet you added that you are preparing to possibly lock the articles in some capacity and do other acts against those who have been falsely branded and wrongly labeled as “vandals” and “harassing the editors” etc... Other editors and administrators who have proven their practice of bias and manipulative and outright double standards practices include “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” and “Chris Mann”. We have documented that they say one thing, yet practice another. We have documented that they enforce one set of wikipedia polices yet discard and ignore those same policies when it applies to themselves or their selective circle of peers. We contributing writers also wonder just how many editors and administrators have a conflict of interest to various articles. So since you “Lessheard vanU” have personally chosen to block IP addresses and made false allegations against me and other contributing people, we are requesting clarification. When did Blackpearl14 become owner, controller and self judge of certain wikipedia articles? If you believe that Blackpearl14 owns and has absolute control over Pirates of the Caribbean articles, then please state that is the policy. Why is Blackpearl14 allowed to violate wikipedia’s own written polices and purpose? Why are other editors and administrators upholding double standards? For you can’t have double standards, as the wikipedia written policies detail a cooperative community effort for articles and, it’s suppose to be neutral. Furthermore, there is no way to discuss nor talk about the reckless actions of Blackpearl14 without saying and describing what they are. Yet, immediately, Blackpearl14 has wrongly and irresponsibly calls anyone placing anything critical or changes to certain pages she had appointed herself as self controller of, as “vandals” and outright claims that she is being “attacked”, and then goes to her peers with which to delete the talk and discussion, leaving only the editors and administrators’ comments and self bias online, while blocking IP’s. What is shocking that you don’t know who I nor other contributing writers are. Why are Blackpearl14 actions being upheld? Why is her emotional state, calling herself various names in fantasy as she selfishly promotes her personal cause to glorify and promote a cause for her love for Pirates of the +i kill people fool!! im from the ghetto homie, i was raised on bread and balonie, i hate niggers and im proud to jack off to your mom +HOW CAN YOU STOP ME EDITING !!!??? +Psychology of religion My addition of a new section to psychology of religion was not ad copy. Is this a field that you know anything about? I do. His book is one of the more important books in the field. Please do not remove. Thanks. +" ''' 《Defender of Open Editing》''' " +" TABYour user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Can't sleep, clown will eat me for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by ""Tedchen"". The reason given for Tedchen's block is: ""vandalism account, personal attacks deleted"". Your IP address is 71.240.34.146." +" Done. And for #17, this is 1946, would even a name be known at this time?''''/HC32 " +Check the user TheRedPenofdoom The user whom you just messaged is vandaliyzing the wikipedia pages from a long time. If you check his contribution you will find that he only reverts the changes and is vandalyzing the pages. Please do check brother and also you can find the user comments on his talk page. With regards, +" Well, what I mean is: should the singles for the other markets have their own separate articles, or have their infoboxes included in the articles below the UK and US infoboxes, or just vanish in the haze? I'm not seeing an answer to that in John's comments. •talk• " +" Advice I would be interested in getting your views on the role of Tyrenius as a mediator on the Michael Ignatieff talk page. Does he have any status as a mediator? By that, I mean, do the participants on the page accept him as a mediator or is he self appointed. (I'm mindful both these conditions could apply). How effective has he been in a mediation role? What problems have arisen, if any? The reason I ask is that (as you will have seen) he made a preemptory removal of some text from the page. This is something that is generally frowned on in my experience. His response to my quoting the guideline on the subject was to remove that too. In the words of the guideline, this is ""unacceptable."" However, I don't want to jeopardize any good work that may be going on by insisting on a point unless it is germane. If this is not the only instance of his being high handed, it may well be. Comments? " +No such options with this unit, unfortunately. It's a bit of a cheap model, but more than adequate for the actual work I use it for. I'll try to remember to crop it first and, maybe, play dumb if it ever comes up. Thanks for the advice. +" Definitely his views contradict the current principles of Wikipedia. I don't think his intention is to comply with them. If no one expresses dissatisfaction and advocates change, there would be no improvement. On the other hand there are users who are abusing the system covertly, like user Zoe and user Mikkalai. User Zoe is using Wikipedia to torture people by artificially finding fault in people's contributions. If she is not sufering from Sadistic Personality Disorder, why doesn't she make contributions herself? What's there in it for her? User Mikkalai's point of view is not neutral. User Mikkalai from Belarussia (an area notorious for right wing tendencies) who is behind the current edition of the Intelligentsia article seems to have a political has reconstructionist, zarist, and nationalistic bias and his edits distort the truth through omission, taking things out of context, and other tools of propoganda. For some reason he stops on pre-revolution Russia, as if there was no further developments after that? Is that neutral? The important role intelligentsia played during the Soviet epoch (70 years of history) is understated if not absent from the article. There is no explanation of the role Jewish intelligents played in the revolution, and why many Jewish intelligents joined the revolution (pogroms and cherta osedlosti) is not mentioned. He is quoting Lenin as calling Intelligents ""the shit of the nation"", while he does not mention that Lenin and Trotsky were intelligents themselves. The attribute of a cosmopolitan is not mentioned either, obviously because it is associated with Jews. He listed for deletion about Abram Kamensky, under the pretext of not being notable enough to be in Wikipedia. Abram Kamensky was mentioned in Russian Jewish Encyclopedia, which is a printed encyclopedia compiled by international experts. How is it that this person is not notable enough to be mentioned in an online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone? This person was mentioned in a Solzhenitsin's novel, he was a deputy minister of the ministry of national affairs, one of the first people to join the bolshevik party, as mentioned in the debate involved in the founding of the short-lived Donetsko-Krivorogian Soviet Republic, father of a well-known russian art critic. This is enough to make him notable. The reason he was demoted to a lower post was because he was briefly a member of the Trostkyst opposition, which Stalin didn't forgive him for. At any rate, the argument that he was somewhat obscure by the time of his death does not hold water, because many people who were famous died in obscurity. The point is, user Mikkalai from Belorussia does not possess a thorough enough knowledge of Soviet history to make that judgement. The reason he listed the article for deletion was personal and political bias. I thought the purpose of Wikipedia was so people could add research and facts to someone's start-up. Not to list every start-up that is perhaps not well researched enough for deletion. User Mikkalai even listed Aleksander Kamensky article for deletion for reason of non-notability one of the most well known art crtitics in later twentieth century Russia, and an internationally recognized expert on Marc Chagall, whose book Marc Chagall, The Russian Years was an international best-seller, and was postthamously reprinted and presented at the Tretiakov gallery with Marc Chagall's granddaughters in attendance. What do you think, this guy knows what he is talking about? He has vandalized Aleksander Kamensky article. He took out Kamensky's definition of the stern style that was one of the three quotes from one of his books, translated personally by LevKamensky for the article. While in the articles discussion page he requested stern style to be defined. This shows that he deleted it without even reading it. If that is not vandalism, than what is? This is a wolf in sheeps clothing. I suggest reverting the article to LevKamensky's last edition and blocking it from further editing. Wikipidia articles are always on the first page when you make a search on Google, or another search engine. This makes Wikipidia a very influential tool in swaying public opinion. Many people complain that Americans are dumb, and they don’t know basic facts, or that they are shallow. Well now with the internet, they are becoming more aware, but don’t leave them in the hands of half-illiterate graduate students, or right wing fanatics. Why was the Russian Intelligentsia category deleted, that LevKamensky created, that contained some three dozen brightest minds in Russian culture of the XX century? Why does the Russian social groups category contain cosacs and peasants but not intellectuals? We think this is more political than neutral. So stop using Wikipedia +organization (The Washington Post ) +" Six's fate Someone keeps removing the detail that Noble Six is killed during ""Lone Wolf"". I think that's a pretty important detail, and there is absolutely no debate that he/she dies, especially because of Halsey's eulogy. I mean, seriously? Six is dead, deal with it. " +Start |B-Class-1= no |B-Class-2= yes/no |B-Class-3= yes |B-Class-4= yes |B-Class-5= yes +::i was cautioned because i am inexperienced and was entrapped. the hostile editor i am dealing with deleted the entire article and substituted a polemical, inaccurate stub. the rules of wiki are voluminous, arcane, byzantiine and not at all user friendly. they are easy to misunderstand for a beginner and easy to manipulate maliciously by an experienced wikipedian like bali. from my reading of the definition of vandalism, i thought bali deleting the entire article was against the rules and my putting it back with minor changes was completely legal. he basically entrapped me into a revert war. he was not punished, but i was not just cautioned, but banned and told I must get consensus to make any further changes. since then the article has been frozen. your other advice would be useful if this was an ordinary dispute with well meaning people who disagree. or if the topic was indeed trivial. it is not appropriate to walk away from an article on the Holocaust because there are malicious and hostile editors who want to falsify the record or, what is happening here, ban basic facts on the Holocaust. this is not a topic where it is acceptable to let the bad guys win - for me. is it okay with wiki administrators? i don't think it is appropriate to use mediation with what are functionally Holocaust deniers. this has been going on for six months. posts asking for consensus are ignored. any post they see as a challenge is answered within minutes. i did walk away for several months, and more recently for days at a time and there is no relief. there has to be another level of getting help at wiki for truly intractable problems like unreasonable, malicious attacks on Holocaust information. not taking sides or even knowing the topic of the dispute is fine when the dispute is between two sincere editors. but what if the dispute is about incontrovertible, non-controversial Holocaust history and editors who have dedicated themselves to keep it out of wiki and also to drive sincere editors off the page, if not to discourage them from ever participating in wiki again? this is much bigger than my individual problem or this one article. this is a wiki problem of how to deal with malicious spoilers. cimicifugia +This is my user talk page. +" it is not ""illegal to discriminate against persons on the basis of their sexual orientation"" regarding pedophilia Can you point me to where the SC has defined ""sexual orientation?"" " +" GPS Removed contrarian remark, You removed important material from the GPS Article , you have removed important material from the article section, ""Problem Description"". You removed a statement that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola. Rather than state what you had done, you gave the vague description, removed contrarian remark. This was a terrible edit on your part because not only is it absolute truth that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola, it is extremely important that the readers be told this fact. The reason for this is because there is much discussion relating to hyperbolas in the section which is quite likely to mislead the reader into believing that the equations to be solved are equations for a hyperbola. The fact that you only say, removed contrarian remark, indicates that you were very superficial in your thinking. It is therefore concluded that we do need a statement alerting readers to the fact that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola. " +" {| style=""background-color:#ddcef2; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #000000; background-color:#ddcef2; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#ddcef2;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background-color:#ddcef2; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background-color:#ddcef2; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#ddcef2"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Assume good fa +I added this to the BLP board. Going back and reading this talk page, its like ground hog day )...anyways, (talk) +" A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar DERKA ALLAH MUHAMMED JIHAD!!! " +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted. {{Quote box | quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.'' | source = Thank you. | width = 20% | align = right }} There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ''' on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome! RJaguar3 | | t Speedy deletion of ""Guru Groceries"" A page you created, Guru Groceries, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. RJaguar3 | | t " +You arrogant administrator homosexual bastards fuck off +how many people does this tit think i am? And whats with asking another editor who wants me banned to help out this is fucking bullshit +" Every reasonably written history of mathematics makes a clear point of emphasizing Cantor's Jewish identity (see, for example, Carl Boyer's competent study wherein it is Cantor's father is a convert and his mother having gentile origins. Historiography is not as straight forward as the amateur historians herein would purport to assert. One has to put Cantor in the context of the period in Jewish history in which he lived. Cantor lived at the time when the failed ""German-Jewish symbiosis"" was still believed possible. It was a time when the poet Heinrich Heine could, and did, assert that conversion to christianity was his ""entry ticket to German society."" The same is also manifestly true of Cantor." +" Deletion of section on Possibility of Mars having enough water to support life I'd like to point out that BatteryIncluded has deleted this section. I won't try to argue with him because I have had a fruitless argument on the ""life on Mars"" page on this very topic. He is convinced that the cosmic ray arguments that make dormant life impossible over hundreds of thousands of years periods in the surface of Mars also make it impossible for life to survive even if reproducing every year (although cosmic radiation levels on the surface are comparable to the interior of the ISS). I gave up arguing the point with him. However I'd like to point out that there has been a major conference earlier this year in February (with 38 scientists presenting the results of their researches) [The Present-Day Habitability of Mars 2013 - Program] You can watch the video presentations and decide for yourself if the current prevailing scientific opinion is that the surface of Mars is potentially habitable or uninhabitable. It is true that before the Phoenix lander possible salty brine observations in 2008 the prevailing view was that life on the surface of Mars is impossible. But that is no longer the consensus and it would be hard to find a single researcher in the field who holds that opinion today. I have put a copy of the section into my user space as I frequently use it for reference and found it a useful resource. Please note I did not write this section myself, only added a couple of sentences to it. User:Robertinventor/possibility_of_Mars_having_enough_water_to_support_life I strongly recommend that it be reinstated. " +Aecis, take a look at this history on the talk page as well as the historyon the refactor pages (listed at the top). After our anonymous friend was locked out of the article via semi-protect yesterday he decided to go on a talk page vandalism spree replacing everything in sight with the content of the article page edited to his liking. +NO! my map is placed in Afghanistan's article in regards to show the area and names of the territories from 15th century to 18th century. It has nothing to do with Safavid or other empires. It's simply a geographical map and don't try to find meaningless reasons to remove this map or I will have no other choice but to bring administrators to resolve this. I uploaded the map the proper way, by it being an antire image. You uploaded half of the image, which is a violation and I can report you for that. You're purpose is to hide the geography of Afghanistan's past and mines is to reveal it. You have no chances of winning. +" And as I told MosMusy, I would strongly consider supporting Armenia for inclusion if there was an outbreak of related Eastern European protests (I don't think a few demonstrations in Albania and Croatia warrant a separate ""2011 Eastern European protests"" article, certainly, and WP:RS doesn't support the hypothesis that Armenian and Azerbaijani protesters may have drawn inspiration from those countries instead of from Tunisia and Egypt) and Armenia was affected. Ditto Central Asian protests, even. It's a border country, and there are competing definitions. I think as long as we make it very clear in this article that Armenia is politically and culturally linked to Europe (like Turkey) despite the geography, we're doing no disservice. As for the comment deletion, I think one or two users are overwriting the previous version of the page when they encounter an edit conflict rather than copy-and-pasting their comments into the current version. - " +" Hello. I love the new table. However I think the color scheme needs a bit of tweaking. The colors I've suggested are widely used in the elimination tables all across Wikipedia maybe cause they're very apt to be honest. Plus the concept of 'Top 3' and 'Btm 3' and 'Btm 2' can be very easily understood through this and long descriptions below the table become unneeded which is a good thing. WIN Top 3SAFEBtm 3 Btm 2style=""background:salmon;"" | Elim" +Influences A glam version of nirvana...? Can someone clarify why they would be considered this or cite a source? 131.247.244.191 +Dinopocalypse I think someone should add info about the Dinopocalypse special, it may even deserve it's own article. +" Niko: Bear in mind that I will apply the above ""axiom"" of yours to all articles of European cities/towns/villages. . . places I'll come across (WP). S " +Good one. I put it back. Thanks for telling me. +Get a sense of humor, you mentally-stuptarded piece of fecal matter. I'll vandalize all i want too an i dare you to stop me, stupid gayboi. +" The reporting of you may give enough idea whether ""I am really publishing a defamatory content"" or ""you are not neutral enough on the subject discussed"".212.174.38.3 " +" Do you have any other similar program? Yahoo, MSN, AIM, Skype? You see, I'm trying to set up some sort of meeting with the Wikiproject members, and I think you should be there too. What operating system do you have? (talk) (anon talk) " +" Ok, Thank you for your help ^_^ ...now about the lower-case, its an Italian grammar rules, all titles (obviously written in Italian language) like the Nobilities ones, political charges, onorific, ecclesial, military ranks etc. must be written with the lower-case even if they are the starting words or they appear after a full stop. This is a very common mistake, in example, dott. Nicola Romani is correct, Dott. Nicola Romani is wrong. If you want I can cite you 2 references: the book of Roberto Lesina, Il nuovo manuale di stile. Guida alla redazione di documenti, relazioni, articoli, manuali, tesi di laurea, 2ª ed. Zanichelli, Bologna, 1994. ISBN 9788808096029; it:Aiuto:Manuale_di_stile#Minuscolo (point nr.2) Sorry; again I'm being vague. You mis-understood my intent. I'm not saying you are ""wrong"", or that the others are ""right"". I'm just pointing out that they were all consistent, and now the Italian template is different to all of the others. As I said: I'm not sure if it matters - I was just pointing out that it's now inconsistent. Cheers, " +REDIRECT Talk:Allied Force Command Heidelberg +" I've made those improvements and updated the sheet too. I've updated the usual place for a Quick look. Could you check the Lawro data? I found a few errors when comparing the original table to the home/away sheet. I think I have them right but it would be worth a check. I'll probably add to the sheet with the position per round for both actual and lawro data shortly. Okay? gonads3 " +, before the Israelis had F-16s +" The picture is of Betsy Bobbins, not Dorothy Gale The picture from the book series with caption: ""Dorothy, as depicted by John R. Neill, is usually cited by fans of the book series as the way they see the character."" - is in fact a depiction of Betsy Bobbins. Curiously, although the ""Summary"" on the picture's page clearly states ""Betsy Bobbins as depicted by John R. Neill"", the picture itself is entitled 'DorothyGaleNeill.jpg', and the uploader (Scottandrewhutchins) declares that it is of ""Dorothy as depicted by John R. Neill"". The young girl is clearly a straw-blonde or redhead like Betsy, and quite unlike other descriptions of Dorothy, so I'm really not sure how this could have happened. SDoradus" +Not vandalism! Those are not vandalism! +" Mutual masturbation has nothing to do with masturbation, it is non-penetrative sex. The word ""masturbation"" is only used as a euphemism, just because handjob and fingering are similar to the way a male or famale masturbates. Mutual masturbation is actually handjob and fingering, which of course is non-penetrative sex, not masturbation! Mutual masturbation is not about two people sitting opposite to each other and masturbating without touching one another, this is nonsense! If no contact exists, this is simple masturbation, no matter how close two persons are to each other. No contact = Masturbation. Contact = ""Mutual masturbation"" (euphemism for handjob and fingering) = Non-penetrative sex. I hope you understand the difference! If you still don't get it, here is a website that maybe explains it a little better: http://www.teensadvisor.com/teen-dating/mutual-masturbation.html " +Redirect complete Just to let you guys know, I redirected the article to iCloud because of the very reason listed in the section above. +Time for a Peer Review! It is now time for another peer review. In particular, I am interested to see opinions regarding whether the current article is overly biased in favor of the subject. At the same time, I think that it is necessary to establish for the reader why this particular individual is important. After all, it is quite a lot to read. Although I think that we have incorporated a good criticism section, I want to ensure that this article reads like an encyclopedia article rather than a fan page. +How did you know I commented here?220.253.222.146 +" Some things about the Dutch and German education systems The Dutch name ""Hoger beroepsonderwijs"" (abbrev. as HBO, though HBO (disambiguation) links to the misspelled redirect Hoger Beroeps Onderwijs) links here, but this seems to be in error, as they are not the same. For example, according to this article, a vocational university can give away master, and sometimes doctorate degrees, but a HBO in The Netherlands can do neither of them. An example of such an organisation is the Hanzehogeschool Groningen. They are not allowed to use the Dutch word for ""university"" in their Dutch name but but rather are what we call a Hogeschool, and what German call Fachhochschule, to confuse the world, they often call themselves ""university of applied sciences"" in the English language. I would propose to link ""Hoger beroepsonderwijs"" and HBO to a new article called something like ""University of Applied sciences in Europe"" and redirect HBO, Hogeschool and Fachhochschule there. The contents of this new page can largely be taken from Fachhochschule. " +REDIRECT Talk:Disciples of The New Church +Controversy Do we have as much in-depth reporting on each and every lawsuit brought against other radio networks, as well as each internal dispute, or is this something unique to Air America Radio? +" Adding unsourced categories Please read WP:Categorization#Articles. ""Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories."" Your recent addition of categories to several articles fails WP:Verifiability. For example, Nation of Islam doesn't mention Black Power, let alone cite a reliable source describing the organization as related to the Black Power movement. So your addition of Category:Black Power was inappropriate. Please follow the categorization guideline in the future. Thank you. 2601:14C:0:F6E9:71B2:6F01:9EB8:B237 " +So i request Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. user:Kelapstick +Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s). Make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. +Dude, why did you delete my article on Nicole Atkins she rocks my face. Can you please make a page on her, shes famous. I'm not good at starting pages, so since you deleted my page on Nicole, you make a page for this amazing singer...please! +" Hey Marnad1963, my only edit to the article was to change the words ""due to the fact"" to the word ""because"" using AutoWikiBrowser, a semi-automated wiki tool. The content you quote isn't just one-sided or opinionated, it's just silly bragging. I've removed it. In situations like that, even if you have a conflict of interest, you are still free to get rid of it. The conflict of interest guidelines say that even if you have a conflict of interest, you are still free to sort out vandalism, spelling and grammar and so on. You haven't specified what your conflict of interest is though, so you might want to explain that on the talk page and/or your user page. Hope that helps. If you've got any further questions or problems, feel free to either ask me or post on help desk. — " +" Just be glad you were only blocked for 48 hours. Getting mad over a block just proves the block was correct in the first place. Terrorist. Good luck Ceoil, I don't plan to post at ANI again, but I just wanted to remind you how much you're admired as an editor. Get mad if you can't help it; but don't get so mad you leave. And if you can avoid getting mad, and figure out how to get a productive outcome out of the conversation, you're an even better editor than I thought. (talk) My apologies. Ceoil, I'm (obviously) not a perfect person; very far from it. I don't try and act as if I am, and I do make more than my fair share of mistakes sometimes. Including my block of you yesterday. I don't view myself as ""above the law"" around here (as it seems some people think I do), and I hope you don't share their sentiment (though I would not blame you for that right now). I cannot erase your block log, but all I can do is offer my apologies for my mistake. I hope that any paths we cross from here on out are more than productive, and hopefully someday we can look back on this with an amusing thread on our talk pages and laugh at my mistake. Either way, please accept my sincerest apologies, and I am a man who can recognize when he is wrong, and this is one of those times. I wish you Happy Holidays, and I hope to see you around the project! Very sincerely, Jmlk17 I have no issue with you Jmlk17, as I said on your talk. The reaction after is the issue. Truth and Reconciliation What happened to you was wrong. The wrong was (later) undone but it cannot be reversed. You are angry, and you are justified in your anger, because it happened. It cannot, however, be changed, but hopefully your anger will subside. Cheers. I hope you can take the advice from a stranger and leave your computer for a few hours. Go do something else for a while and ignore us silly fools on wikipedia. Sleep on it, come back tomorrow and then we can talk about how things could be improved so things doesn't happen again. Right now you're angry and reacting, just waiting a few hours can drastically change ones outlook - I know, I've been pissed plenty of times myself. After all, this is just a website. henrik•talk Thanks, but my whole point is that this stuff gets washed under the carpet, and nobody is listening. I'm not going to let this go. I'm not suggesting anything getting washed under the carpet, I just hope you can wait a few hours or until tomorrow before proceeding. henrik•talk Thanks. Great advise. Tongue in cheek Don't take my ""shallow,"" or rather tongue in cheek, comments at WP:AN at face value. I actually spend a fair amount of time trying to calm the lynch mobs around here, and my most recent effort was unsuccessful. So I've been venting a bit and perhaps aping the attitude of the ban hammerers at your expense. I hope you didn't take anything I wrote too seriously. If you ever were the subject of an unjust block that no admin wanted to lift I'd be among those leaping to your defense. talk Well you did get unblocked. The half-serious part is there are plenty of editors less fortunate than you. Try to keep that in mind. talk Recently, i haven't found myself in agreement with Kendrick. He is absolutely right here, though. You might want to take a deep breath and relax the tone in your emails messages.I know how easy it is to take offense and fight off the overriding desire to chop your fellow editors into little, civil cubes, but honestly, it doesn't work. It's hard on the assumption of good faith, and its hard on the furniture. Maybe live and let live. - (cast a spell) 02:09, +" Clarification In 2002, Waterston and fellow Law & Order castmate Jerry Orbach were honored as ""Living Landmarks"" by the New York Landmarks Conservancy. This means that Sam Waterston is no longer at risk for being demolished to make way for a new CVS. Do they mean their homes? I dont get the ""Sam Waterston is no longer at risk for being demolished to make way for a new CVS"" part. Couldn't Sam just step outta the way? P Someone help me out here. ... and who cares where he stands on firearms? Thats his business, not ours. " +LaRouche Why is there no mention of LaRouche's claim that he came up with it? In the article about LaRouche it mentions that he proposed the idea. +" Retrosheet coverage See ""Regional Postseason Series"" at Retrosheet. Those series, including three matching Cleveland and Cincinnati, were official—sanctioned by Baseball. They exclude preseason (none sanctioned), mid-season (none sanctioned), and unsanctioned postseason games matching the same teams. " +":::::::: That's what Prof. Tipler is known for claiming, hence ""purported."" In his 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics article, Tipler claims to have presented the quantum gravity Theory of Everything (TOE). And in his writings since that time, that's what he continues to maintain. It's not our job to say whether he's correct or not, or as you are doing, become indignant over his claims and attempt to rewrite history.74.4.222.208 " +|B-Class-1= yes |B-Class-2= yes |B-Class-3= yes |B-Class-4= yes |B-Class-5= yes +"""Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that can unfortunately be edited by dopers, children,felons,feeble-minded people,morons, fools and worse."" Marcus Smerf " +is western hemisphere also Germany? Because we got at least 6 egyptology departments! kind regards GoJoe +"is still disputed. == Several sections of this article added by ISKapoo, Vikramsingh were regularly removed/censored by ITAQALLAH and others. This article is still in dispute, please do not remove the tag until all the disputes involving this article are resolved. If you wish to know what is in dispute read the talk page. You will find a very long discussion there are realize that the recent inactivity was due to several persons (including ISKapoo & Vikramsingh) giving up any hope of maintaining a balanced viewpoint due to the constant censorship of ITAQALLAH and others. Are you sure you understand the tags you've put up? There is clearly no controversial or unsourced content in the article that alludes to. This looks more like a heap of tags just to say you don't like the article as it stands. Neither you nor your colleagues have given any detailed reason why the removal of crankish, poorly sourced, fringe material contravenes WP:NPOV, and how the material isn't in violation of WP:BLP (whereas I have shown it is). Please stop vandalizing this article by removing the tags. Your behavior has become a burden on most wikipedians. - Please demonstrate that you understand the issues at hand and are not merely placing tags so as to register your personal grievances with the page. You can do so by actually explaining how the tags are justified and how the fringe material removed doesn't violate core content policies. User:Agnistus has claimed the neutrality of this article is disputed. That is legitimate. Now, I'd like to now what is it in the article that Agnistis finds to be a violation of WP:POV. I advise Itaqallah to give the user 24 hours (or the next time he signs on, whichever is earlier) to produce his/her reasons for placing the tag. Thank you Agnistus for your anticipated cooperation. Dear , you do not know that the article is disputed? ""crankish, poorly sourced, fringe material"" ???. The statements by Zakir Naik on the rights on non-muslims were properly sourced material of much importance to the article(to maintain a balanced viewpoint). You have repeatedly and continously indulged in deletion of this material. Your actions have constituted a blatant violation of WP:BLP. Read the 50-page long talk page and you will understand the reasons for the disputed status. You are probably blind to this gross censorship since you yourself were the censor. Until and unless a fully balanced viewpoint is presented (ofcourse in compliance with WP:BLP) in the article, the tag cannot be removed. BTW , there is absolutely no necessity for a 24-hour window, as it is perfectly clear to any Non-Islamic fundamentalist from the talk page that this article is totally disputed. And if you (ITAQALLAH) still feel the material that you censored was ""crankish, poorly sourced, fringe material"", then please visit: , ; and please read the articles on Zakir Naik in , and . - Agnistus, I can only gather from your response that you have little basis in policy for inserting your tendentious unreliable material or what amounts to a pointish protest tag. Youtube.com isn't a reliable source; wikiislam and faithfreedom.org are unreliable polemical websites which cannot be considered as reliable sources on any topic, let alone a living person. Perhaps you have missed Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Criticism and praise, WP:RS, WP:V, but your objection seems to be that your own personal perspective is not copiously represented. Could you please tell me how videos of Zakir Naik on Youtube.com are not reliable? Do you think some video artist carefully crafted those videos and put it up there? Only an idio +I didn't say you favored him over me, I said you were treating us equally when it's blatantly clear to anyone looking in that there's only one party being actively disruptive here. I guess nothing I wrote actually registered, which in a way supports the second part of what I wrote. I'm sorry to be critical, but after two weeks of this crap, day in, day out, getting hammered with warnings and other bogus edits, and even trying to step back for the last four days, and still seeing myself blamed by you for this, and insulted, and generally treated as just as much crap as the person actively doing all of this, I had to say something. And you're still doing it. +I got your message Fuck you +Edit history merge possibly required Hey, I noticed you moved the Iran assassination article to a more appropriate name (although depending on how allegations play out perhaps the investigation is broader and the media will provide a convenient shorthand)... but i just wanted to make sure that any history from the prior page would be appropriately merged into the history of the new page, to comply with licensing terms. In other words. Articles A and B were created and B was merged into A, and then A was renamed to B, which means that all of the contributions need to be registered in the edit history to comply with copyright requirements. I've got no opinion right now on the name... I was surprised how long it took to create the first article actually, I almost did it myself... but I think that in some time there may be an obvious confluence of a few investigations so they can be comfortably grouped under one heading. In the meantime, it'd be good if we kept the contribution history all in one place, as best we can, to comply with the GPL, etc. +" Yes, it is implied, but I dislike implications within a definition, even when they are correct. And I believe a general reader may share the sentiment, or even get confused. Decades ago, before computers, it was important to make simple equations even simpler. To that aim, static equilibrium was used in some accelerating system problems, of course with the inertial forces included (the approach was credited to dAlembert). A simple example would be to determine maximum acceleration of a motorbike for a given friction coefficient (no limitation on engine power). When solved in the accelerating frame in which the center of mass was at rest, one could use torques about any point (as both static equilibrium conditions apply) and achieve minor simplifications in calculation. As I recall, one would casually refer to that accelerating frame as ""the motorbike CM frame"". Why not, the meaning was perfectly clear, and what authority might there be to forbid such usage? That being said, I am aware of the fact that relativistic particle collisions are best described in inertial COM frames. Some authors call them ""COM systems"", as e.g. in the Sears and Zeemansky College Physics. (They even claim that ""COM system"" is a relativistic generalization of ""CM system"" - people will use various conventions.) " +" uhse elite university i erased it for him, he is sailing, he asked me to transmit to all that he is sorry. it was written by me. good luck - chandra (uwe´´s secretary) " +sources There is not a single source listed. How can anyone believe this shit. +" Bot flag granted Congratulations! You have been flagged as a bot. =Nichalp «Talk»= " +You judge for yourself. An editor makes a template in order not to have to type a reference every time he uses it. I called him te laziest editor I've met on Wikipedia so far. ))) +GET OFF OF WIKIPEDIA, YOU WALNUT-PANELED IDIOT!!! YOU WOULDN'T KNOW A GOOD SCHEDULE IF IT PUT CLAMPS ON YOUR TESTICLES!!! 81.154.227.244 +Found a CBS News link. The narrative in the article jumps around a little too much. I can see the value in putting personal life and relationships in one section (including anything post 1980), with separate sections for music, art, peace activism and other professional activities. Artwork The paragraph about John Cage is unsourced The detail about Painting to Be Stepped On is unsourced +This isn't a contest, but as a loser I can see why you think it is. How did you enjoy your ban, Chimpy? I laughed and used another account. Mine was called RusskieFool1234. See if you can find what I did. +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  (Talk) +" Thank you for your comment. ncram " +I'll be back...just you wait. +I'm not really sure that this site is relevent to anyone outside that part of the United States. I think it should be deleted +" Image Tagging Image:Destroyer.JPG This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:Destroyer.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (T/C) " +" Answer to Mütze Well, I am surprised to see that I am unblocked! At least, you still have seen that you targeted the wrong person for the wrong reasons!! Mütze, I have used this Wikipedia for only a few days but I am still not an idiot. Of course, what I say further below on what I think you did is an assumption but I believe a very good one! Here is what you did. You saw the following I posted on the Bosendorfer discussion page: ""Very soon, this article will be published and you will have to leave it this way; otherwise, the censors at Wikipedia will be forced to side with me (!!) considering the fact that I gave you the opportunity to challenge what I wrote in my article."". As you clearly told me yourself, you did not want my article to be published. This quote clearly threatened you because I told taht I will soon publish my article and it will be with the full support of everybody because I used the discussion page of Bosendorfer. You then contacted Andrew Norman to block me to prevent me from editing the Bosendorfer discussion page and then you thought you could keep me away on my own user page with the intention of blocking me indefinitively. When you blocked me indefinitively through RobertG, you knew too well that no one could read my user page afterward! That is what I believe you did! And it is probably easily verifiable by people at Wikipedia. Now, what is your role at Wikipedia? You are not an administrator; otherwise you would have blocked me yourself directly! Anyway, I propose to carry on the discussion on the Bosendorfer discussion page concerning my article. I am ready to change sentences that cause problems. It is just up to you to mention these problematic sentences on this Bosendorfer discussion page and if you have a valid reason to have this sentence changed, it will be changed. I am not a fanatic and I am ready to please people. I will use logic and reason to assess a request to change sentences, not emotions. If I do not want to change a sentence, I will say clearly why and we could discuss further on this refusal to accept a change if it happens. And I will answer the points you raised in your previous postings, Mütze. So, I hope you will behave a little bit more relaxed about what I intend to do. The goal: publish a good article on a good product that inform people who read it. Apparently, for the time being, mostly the group of administrators and their friends (!!) who are the only ones who complained about my article so far. But to have had to go through such a nightmare just to want to publish a good article on Wikipedia is surely not the right way to do at Wikipedia with people who are ready to contribute positively!! You are really going to put people off wanting to write on Wikipedia! And I especially target the administrators who have been in contact with me in a very aggressive way. Just a few days ago, I did not even know that what an administrator was at Wikipedia! Here is what Jimbo Wales says on his user page: ""Newcomers are always to be welcomed. There must be no cabal, there must be no elites, there must be no hierarchy or structure which gets in the way of this openness to newcomers."". If he knews what I had to go through and the very aggressive behaviour I experienced from administrators at Wikipedia, he would not be very pleased. What I say above, he call it one of his main principles! So, administrators, when you contact people, make sure you remember this very core principle of one of the founders of Wikipedia and target the true vandals instead of people like me who are willing to add a good article to Wikipedia! Jimbo Wales wants people to write as many articles as possible on Wikipedia. Your role as administrators is to help and encourage them to do so instead of trying to block them indefinitively! So, I hope you can now all relax and not get emotional or upset on this coming article. I follow the process used by Wikipedia to deal with an article that causes opposition. See the new comments now on the Bosendorfer discussion page and state the sentences that cause you problems and especially why these sentences are problematic. Then, I will do my best to change them to please everybody. MichaelIsGreat" +Your attitude is sliding straight downhill. As soon as I identify who died and made you God of Wikipedia, I'll address your idiosyncratic interpretation of the rules for 'official'. Most people would interpret 'an official page' to mean 'an official page' rather than 'the official page'. Furthermore, someone who apparently can't figure out how to get past an introductory video in Google Earth really shouldn't be throwing stones, although one is tempted to throw in a comment about 'stone-age' and 'dinosaur'. I did add some wordage about the 'tours' as there may well be others like you who aren't familiar with Google Earth. Wouldn't you prefer returning to ODP and working on a category or something? +Now located at List of paradoxes#Economy. +I think that if Impure World Resurrection jutsu should be listed, then the Earth Clone Technique should be listed as well, at least for now until the anime covers more of the new manga. Who agrees with me that all of the techniques that a character has used in Naruto (except for the fundamental ones like Clone Jutsu, Replacement Jutsu, etc.,) should be re-added back in their main articles? Power level (Dragon Ball) +" I make edits to existing articles without any pretence to tell ""full story"". Nobody knows the ""full story"" even about himself. Apparently, YOU +do not even know your name. " +" Take your template...bla bla and stick bal bla bal sun, bla dont, bla shine, bal bla. Ceoil " +You are free to add content to Criticisms section, but it must be argument about socialism, not an attack on capitalism. Thing +Not in the article it can't. It would be like comparing a theoretical 1000MW plasma drive to the wheels that drive Apollo's chariot. +Not every genre on each page has a 'reliable source.' Have u ever considered that? And I don't see what's disruptive about it. I know a genre when I here it, it seems like u ignorant fucks don't. It's no wonder people always say Wikipedia isn't always right. That's y I changed the genres. +Seth Ravin You voted in the DRV for Seth Ravin, and I wanted to let you know that the article is again at AFD: Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Seth Ravin 2. Thanks. - +Oh really? Mr. Abuse of policy toward new editors? +I did. As far as I can tell, anyway. They're not there anymore. +What about the Associated Press one? (The one with shuler). What's wrong with that? +Note de Cazenave died today. I have removed him from the list. +Ranking Out Is this school even ranked? +|decline=The terms of your unblock are pretty specific. Bluemarine is unblocked for the limited purpose of his making contributions related to increasing the accessibility of Wikipedia to users with handicapping conditions.. As far as the 60 days is concerned, it also says, If Bluemarine complies with these conditions for a period of 60 days, a request for further modification of his ban may be submitted. Nothing says that such a request would be automatically accepted, and there's no ArbCom statement that the request was accepted or even considered, so you're quite mistaken about your status. :==( o ) +|importance = high |class = start +Regarding edits made during September 26 2006 (UTC) to Uncle Tom's Cabin Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +I think I wrote the initial page, probably as an anon in one of my earlier efforts. I concur with your idea. Just do it! d:) +A subject's marital status is generally considered a pretty basic piece of information included in most articles. +DUDE! Give me my First Degree The D.E. page back!! He's an important, relevant rapper from the west coast!! What the hell man.. Why did you delete it!! I want it back!!! +hello go to hell. FIrst of all my comment on feces was correct whore. Can you be a gay whore? Also dont edit cyrus or brazil both of them are true you gay homo. Finally go hump your dog and play in traffic. Are you secretly brazilian? +In other words, you knew exactly what you were doing. You did it knowing that there was a thorough discussion and a clear consensus against you. Next time you try a stunt like that, I'm bringing it to ANI. +Yeah, I realized I created a duplicate ID. Sorry about that. I guess I'm just not into the politics of what Wikipedia has become recently. It used to be more friendly and forgiving around here. I don't see how referring to the manufacturer site from an article about what they manufacture is spammy, but ok. I was trying hard to avoid promotional language. I agree with you on the Verifiability issue. +I am going to shove a pineapple up your ass. You'll fucking need major surgery to pull that shit out! +Regarding edits made during January 11 2008 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Thermal conductivity page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. +There would need to be a citable source for such a statement 209.181.16.93 +}} My comments against Leithp were constructive. If they caused offence, I apologise +help I dont know whats the problem but i can do external links or click on any of the buttons used for bold text etc... do you know what could have caused this? cant name this messag esince none of the buttons works. +User:Abd is muslim cr@p +dont delete it self hating jewish freak listen you are self hating jewish freak wikipedia is a place to writing facts and not a stupid opinions if any one will delete it i ask it from neutral persons ok. this is not the place to express your opinions if you want there is forums not this place. you psychopaths even came until here? how low can you down? +just a clarification... man, if you think it was me (kumarnator) that wrote that Fowler and Fowler was indian; it wasnt. I am the one trying to diminish pakistani/muslim/arab propaganda on wikipedia. Thanks, and good luck on wikiproject hinduism!!!!! +This is my real physical model. Ohms law, is a statistic of the resistor. So its not real. Ohm never said V=IR. So all I can say is what is your source, when you say it. Who said V=IR? Ohm did NOT say it. Who said it, and tell me how it is scientific. I am now making you explain yourself. In my real physical model, the electron is a physical stress on the ether, and the charge is just apart of the mass and is apart of gravity. And in my physical model, gravity, and mass and charge are all one and cant exist without each other. and V is only = to IR, when you make a circuit that is low power. If you just hook up a resistor to something like a car battery, V is not IR. And if you have a non ohmlic material, even if your voltage source is of lower power, V is not IR. (example FET transistor material) +"::I don't understand. (Clearly). Their licenses are exactly what I stated them to be: web site screenshots. In every case I think ""screenshot"" supplants the actual truth which is ""download,"" but the two are hardly dissoluble. And Jim, surely you are not so naive as to ""believe,"" truthfully, that Wikipedia is not a battleground. See Islam. See Tutankhamun. Wikipedia not a battleground? It is nothing but. ( ) " +fuck you this is for blocking me fuck you worm. +" The problem with linking up Basaev's claim with VK going to the training camp is that the two sources claim he was already at the camp long before the burial. [This one] says he joined the camp at the end of 2002: В конце 2002 года Ходов куда-то пропал, сказал наш собеседник. Сейчас мы установили, что тогда он вместе с еще 30 боевиками прошел обучение на одной из баз террористов под названием «Талибан��. Она располагалась неподалеку от села Галашки (At the end of 2002 he just landed somewhere - a Russian phrase meaning we lost track of him - now we have established, said our interlocutor, that at that time together with 30 fighters he went trough training at one of the terrorist bases, called ""Taliban"". It was situated not far from the village of Galashki) It seems he was allowed out for the burial, but in company (see below). I also found the Trud article which claims a temporary separation, or even state of divorce of the parents: [] There is more interesting info in this article: 1) Aleksandra was married before: Анатолий усыновил трехлетнего ребенка Александры от первого брака Владимира. 2) At School Number One Vladimir was horribly ambitious and looked dosn on the other kids of his age: Там у Владимира проявились болезненная амбициозность и презрительное отношение к ровесникам. (other sources claim Boris was a hooligan: so he differed from the kids his age in the opposite way) 3) No info on the father after their return, but since other sources claim among other things that Anatoly often visited his son in jail and was convinced he was innocent, I think they again lived together. 4) Vladimir did not arrive at the funeral on his own, but in the company of two bearded friends, one of whom villagers later recognized amongh the dead Beslan hostage takers: Да не один, а в компании двух никому не знакомых бородачей - одного из них потом эльхотовцы опознали среди убитых в Беслане террористов. 5) After the Islamic funeral, VK went back to the village and pushed the tables with drinks around, referring to Islamic law, and threatened to shoot the people gathered there: Вернувшись в село, где начинались поминки, Ходов попытался перевернуть столы с выпивкой, ссылаясь на законы фундаментального ислама. И даже пригрозил расстрелять собравшихся. 6) The journalist asked the Militia minister of Northern Ossetia whether the freeing of VK proved that he had powerful protectors in the local police department (ROVD). ""I do not exclude that possibility"". Я не исключаю такой возможности”, - ответил мне Сослан Иванович. 7) Aleksandra already left Elkhotovo before the village council decide to banish her. According to rumours she went to live with someone she knew in Vladikavkaz: Ну а мать террористов еще до решения сельского схода уехала из Эльхотова. По слухам она перебралась к знакомым во Владикавказ. (Vladikavkaz is the capital of North Ossetia. I doubt very much that a village council has the right to banish someone from North Ossetia.) About the letter of the 30 to Komsomolskaya Pravda - I have never before put a text in Wikisource. I suppose this should go into the Russian version? I do not find there any heading where it looks normal to put a letter to a newspaper.User_talk:Pan_Gerwazypgp " +Schulte joined Jagdstaffel 12 in November 1916. He became its first ace during the opening months of 1917, scoring nine victories. He collided with a Royal Aircraft Factory FE.2d from No. 18 Squadron RAF on 12 April 1917, killing both himself and the British pilot and observer.Albatros Aces of World War I, p. 37. +" Ok so your saying you dont know ray comfort is a fundamentalist, then maybe you should not stick you ideas on a topic you do not know about and are unwilling to educate yourself on! You could email him and ask him yourself if thats what it takes! The fact he is a fundamentalist and people do not like it is not in the rules to remove to remove a fact that was referenced! ""I have read the policies you cite and I suggest you read the ones I have mentioned as they clearly encompass this situation"" Thats lawyering and your opinion on the rules, which is offcoruse wrong. Show me in the rules where it says to exclude a verified fact?203.192.91.4 " +"Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Talk/Cont - Talk/Cont October 2008 Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Talk/Cont " +is editing Wikipedia at a very reduced level for an unspecified period of time. |} +" Image:Characters shane.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Characters shane.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. '''''' " +Please delete the section and direct the reader to video compressions as the section is not really how it's done or what it's for. Intra-frame is a a type of compression (one of two) and you are mixing up keyframes as used for video compressions and keyframes that are used for computer animation which can be variably placed as opposed to the GOPs which are only five frames and used universally in all temporal compression. +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – " +wikiubx.pl Wiki Userbox Generator]'''. |} +Please, go and sign for mediation I requested for mediation, if you agree, go and sign here: Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/White Argentine +REDIRECT Talk:Swimming at the 1936 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 200 metre freestyle relay +arrrrgghhh Come on! I need that Colbert image for a user box I made. I got it from the Colbert fansite. Can you help me out? +" 203.101.20.116 has changed the topic to ""Books by Ambedkar"" This is not correct. Not all writings of Dr. Ambedkar can be called as books. SOme are speeches, some are transcripts of the deliberations in the parliaments. So i am reverting the topic to ""His Writings and Speeches"" This same topic has been used by the goverment while publishing his writings. I dont know why you have deleted the links to his writing and speeches. so i have to revert them. Please justify on talk before making such drastic changes." +Wprost All those who think the Wprost cover for the week of June 25, showing Angela Merkel breast-feeding the Kaczinsky twins, raise your hands.... +Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for Campus Ambassadors in Houston Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian connected with the University of Houston. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at another Houston school, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students. Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus). If you live in Houston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page. +" Also, as far as BlackCab, again you don't know that HE has ""personally attacked me"" and others, with words such as ""deranged"" and that BlackCab over the months and years has been in LOTS of trouble and notice pages. You're being too hasty and quick without all the facts and knowledge. And singling me out, as if BlackCab and Jezzy are saints or something. Sighs... Far from the truth. (No, seriously, they have been rude and unfair, but for some weird reason you just don't see it anywhere with Jezz...even though he unquestionably violated WP, and has been uncivil and disrespectful and hypocritical...with lies and double standards. He said I did not talk about the article itself (a lie) and only soapboxed him as if he never said anything negative about me in individual comments of his. And he also said that I ignored ""Bold Revert Discuss"" when I have been discussing a great deal. I get your point that I re-inserted earlier on before discussing, but you're acting like not violating 3RR means absolutely nothing. There's a balance, beecause I know that edit-warring can happen even without breaking 3RR, but it's not like I did not put big work and presentations and rationales on the article talk page, taking time and energy. Totally unappreciated by Jezz (and apparently by you). You notice so-called uncivil remarks and behavior from me and nothing from Jezz, which makes me question your analysis to be honest. He's been horrendous and you don't even seem to care or even admit it...or see it! He wrote individual comments soapboxxing against me. That goes un-addressed (accept by me). And then he insanely accuses me of what he was blatantly himself guilty of doing. Unbelievable. " +" Hello 3rdeyefilm, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of contents Department directory Need help? Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. 3rdeyefilm, good luck, and have fun. – talk " +" Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Talk Contribs " +Taking this outside: See new section... +The wording is quite clearly inane and ridiculous. I have no idea what you're playing at. 190.46.98.195 +The people who have done section blanking have mushroomed all of a sudden in just 3 days, while the article was developed by many contributors over years. Please retore it to the previous level and lock the same for a while. The article was clean and we were working it to make it as an Featured artilce. Please go through the history and decide it as per your own conscience +Sir you are not supposed to delete quotes for quotes you prefer, that is a bias. There are a couple of quotes right above the ones I put, stating the converse side. My quotes were well sourced. You are supposed to talk it out. You can believe in Darwinism but if you do this fact deletion again you maybe blocked. +Search me. |q=1: Perhaps Shudra means more than more thing, why doesn't the word Shudra link to the correct article/ section? |a=Response: Same as answer 1 +I'm not going to act unilaterally, which would start a war, but if you want I will take the issue to the noticeboard. +" Image:PA_writing.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:PA_writing.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ≈talk " +Names of Birds And while I have your attention, why do the the names of birds get written in caps whereas that is not the case for other creatures? Why the Yellow-tailed rat, but the yellow-tailed Cockatoo? +Sorry. Did not mean to break rule. I'm just frustrated I've been blocked. +" The Sikh Gurudwara Act of 1925 clearly mentions ""Kabirpanthi Sikh or Ramdasia Sikh"". This act is part of the Pakistan Government Punjab Laws. Pakistan was part of India in 1925. Ramdasia[Weavers,Julahas] have no relationship with Ravidasia[Chamar,Cobblers]. " +" June 2012 (UTC) I think if we remove the plot summaries (not really needed since by then we'll have full episode articles hopefully) that'll give us one row per episode; if we move the columns so the episode title is the first one, not the number, and add ""scope=row"" to that cell, we'll have us our MOS:DTT table. Having it all in one large table with some indication of season (beyond a season field) like cell shading in the title cell would also be a good idea; that would allow the full list of episodes to be sortable across all columns. On another note; I'm looking at The Post-Modern Prometheus and Deep Throat (The X-Files episode) for possible A-Class candidates; I can't sign off on the latter as I'm the author, but I just need one more say from someone (probably Glimmer) to let Prometheus get the boost. X 23:28, 27" +Your Fired Match I read about Kelly Kelly facing Vickie Guerrero in a Your Fired match, I just posted it, hopeful, wikipedia will keep it. +" The parameter is an alias for - I tend to prefer the specific to the general, so for newspapers, I normally use . Now, regarding the documentation that you linked, it says publisher: Name of publisher; may be wikilinked if relevant. The publisher is the company that publishes the work being cited. Do not use the publisher parameter for the name of a work (e.g., a book, encyclopedia, newspaper, magazine, journal, website). Not normally used for periodicals. Corporate designations such as ""Ltd"", ""Inc"" or ""GmbH"" are not usually included. Omit where the publisher's name is substantially the same as the name of the work (for example, The New York Times Co. publishes The New York Times newspaper, so there is no reason to name the publisher). In the case of The Observer, the company that publishes the work being cited is Guardian News and Media Limited - not The Guardian. This publication could be cited as . However, for The Guardian - where the publisher's name is substantially the same as the name of the work - we would use alone. " +":::The places that deserve venting about cultural bias in Wikipedia are the places where that bias is found. Maybe admins should find a less idiotic way to respond to venting than threats of banning and accusation of trolling. Maybe, for example, it ought to pop into your head that the venting originates with a grievance that deserves to be taken seriously. I think there are racist admins on Wikipedia who use their position to push an agenda regarding Israel/Palestine, and our mechanisms of admin accountability are inadequate. I think there is cultural bias affecting our treatment of these topics, and our principles to monitor cultural bias are empty promises (i.e., bullshit). I think there is no chance in Hell that a study of our reliability of any number of political issues would match the widely cited study on our reliability that looked only at technical articles. Our coverage of politicized, controversial topics is worthless, POV-polluted crap and everybody knows it. Maybe you should also refrain from bringing your opinion about a content dispute into your threats. The ""pedantic arguments"" to which you refer concern some text that currently exists in the article, and which version deserves to prevail. My arguments aren't pedantic to me, and threatening me for making them is exactly the sort admin powertrip admins are sick of me complaining about. Threatening people is disruptive. " +Sorry about that reversion; I misread the sentence. (I do probably 50 edits/reviews a day and sometimes slip up.) Reversion of OR on the William Westmoreland article +JUST SMOEK WEEED TWICE AS HARD!!!! +It took you one hour to ambush me with a petty taunt and a needless power-trip in my own talk page. Don't you have anything better to do? +Please, avoid foul language. 189.7.44.220 +Komsorg Komsorg is not a trade-union organizer anyway. It is Komsomol Organizer. +You are really a dishonest person I've just found the following from the suspected sock puppet case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/PalaceGuard008#User:Sumple Man, you are really a dishonest person, disgusting!!!! +" I even found figure exactly for article case which illustrates bullet drop with numbers and is very easy to understand. But i am tired from expert editors. I will present this link if (after checking numbers on figure) you will name yourself ""stupid noob"" and you will stop editing articles in which you are noob. Just to prove that wikieditors does not care about wikipedia quality. Thats why wikipedia is so full of shit. 69.141.140.192 " +MfD nomination of User:Snickyc/Chris Cacavas . Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Snickyc/Chris Cacavas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of +Bornfeld Mr. Bornfeld is a teacher of AP Eurpean History at Aliso Niguel High School. Some students find it humorous to put his name in articles that they have to research, please watch out for his name to keep popping up +Carcass Wikipedia Hello, I hope you are well. My name is Bill and I play guitar in a band called Carcass. It appears you have taken it upon yourself to edit our Wikipedia page, even going so far as to undo any recent attempts on our part to correct the numerous mistakes that are present. Now, while we do appreciate that there may be good intentions at work, the bottom line is that someone we have never even met has decided that they know more about our band's history than we do. And that is annoying, to put it mildly. If all of this was done from a fan's perspective and a genuine (if misguided) desire to set the record straight, I must thank you for your efforts. In many ways I can relate to that position as I still consider myself a fan of music first, a musician second. But I also know I wouldn't ever have the nerve to try and govern any of my favourite bands' Wikipedia pages. Given that this is the insane world of the internet, I won't make the rash assumption that you are actually an admirer of our band. This wouldn't be the first time that someone who dislikes us has chosen to spread misinformation online. But in the (perhaps unlikely) event that you are interested and prepared to listen, let me know and I will explain which details are wrong, and why. There are quite a few and in all honesty I don't want to waste my time going through all of this unless you are genuinely concerned. All the best, Bill Steer +" The ""bold move"" was at 05:48, 3 December 2013‎ by " +No I don't think so, and what you said is just 'theories' without any good sources for backup. I'm sorry but this article itself is well done, I don't see the point of adding anything else that is just plain silly. +Mr.Yamla man/woman antidemocratic paid by ASUS! Bye +And after seeing this and this, and now your repeated postings here in this section after I indicated that you should stop, I have no confidence that you know how to quit a person's talk page when they ask, otherwise indicate, or tell you to quit it. +" Your GA nomination of Moments (One Direction song) The article Moments (One Direction song) that you put up for good article nomination has been put on hold . There are some prose and reference formatting issues that are keeping the article from reaching good article status. You will have the general seven days to address these issues and/or debate the points you believe do not concern good article status. See this for more information on what needs to be fixed. • TALK " +The hangon template does not go here on your talk page, but on the article itself. Thanks, talk contribs +October 2006 (UTC) What you mean like Cyde presents Kelly's evidence and the Arbcom thank her? 10:54, 14 +thanks a lot i can edit now +File:NH90 NZDF.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NH90 NZDF.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +no logic Why is it that on tv you can see sombody blown up and see the news were they show you a hostage situation and you see sombodys head being shot off but saying fuck, shit, asshole, cock,pussy,god damn, ect. is concedered by the fcc wrong and could have negative effects. Words dont hurt. a four year old watching tv and seeing sombody get the shit blown the fuck out of them will have more of a negative. FUCK the FCC. +Since you reviewed the block, I thought you might be interested in or have constructive comments at User_talk:Rannpháirtí_anaithnid#not_edit_warring. +" (UTC) Just because you don't see someone showing racial discrimination doesn't mean someone ain't intentionally using ""biasness"" to promote racial discrimination. And to begin with the picture of the Asian guy and blonde women is skinny as hell with no body mass whatsoever. SO WHY WOULD SOMEONE REPLACE MODERATE FIGURES WITH ANOREXIC FIGURES? There was an similar incident before, someone in the Australian aborigine wiki page decided to used the most ape looking australian aborigine to promote the stereotypes Australian aborigines look like apes which created quite an stir among some wiki users. Even though the person says there is no racism, he chose the most ape looking Australian aborigines... this is what I called ""BIAS RACISM"". (talk (talk • contribs) 5:37, 12 march" +Verifying information I believe it would be good to verify information before deleting content. Information such as current name holders and schools attached to the name General Conference of the Evangelical Baptist Church, Inc. Deleting information not verified does the article no good. In fact what it does instead is mis represents General Conference of the Evangelical Baptist Church, Inc. all together. It should understood that verification can be supplied to this article if such a request is made. +Consider watching ...Theredpenofdoom. Do watch the user user:theredpenofdoom. He is vandalazing the wikipedia pages. You should visit his talkpage and his contribution section to see that he only erase the wikipedia links. Thanks in Advance. 101.62.228.141 +Oy vey JIDF detected +thank you very much, i hope this is just an understanding and nothing else, he just is very dissmissive when he does things. Yes, that one. +Hatch, Go ahead and block me, my job is to promote clients, I guess you wont let me promote the other ten I was assigned to. It'd be better if you did block me, and I did not erase anything but the Costa article which you still have to delete. Are you all talk Hatch my redneck friend? +Hiding the true sender I just got a spam where the fictional 'from' field was actually MY e-mail address, which had the added effect of making it impossible to block. Does anyone know how you find out the true sender address, and/or shouldn't something about this fraud be in the article? Also, isn't there someplace you can forward spam e-mails to and the organization will track down the sender and prosecute them? I know 419 scams have that. +hi I think your sad and lonely and need to get a life or at LEAST SOME FRIENDS THANK YOU +Where it says Do not add [...] people without Wikipedia articles to this list on the date pages it means it. You'll need to create an article about whoever before adding their dates of birth or death. +with personal wealth +Parts of the notable features section currently read like an ad for the house. +Requested move 23 September 2015 :Aled Davies (throwing events) → – This was moved by an editor who felt athlete was a ambiguous term and thus wanted to pin point the person's specialty. There was no other reason to move as there are no other track and field athletes called Aled Davies and 'throwing events' is a far more confusing term than 'athlete' which is used across Wikipedia without any real issues. +"quicker response please email me) You forgot to remove the tag, which is deprecated and automatically tags the image as lacking a source. I've restored the image and added a rationale, and will try to place it back in the appropriate articles. east718 // talk // email // ThanX for the fix. Actually I had problems selecting the right license tag (from the Image upload menu provided), IIRC there was no selection for PD image modified (cropped in this cases) and the GPLed. This should be fixed. 1RR East- I noticed this. Could you elaborate for me where you believe I violated my 1RR restriction? Thanks. Revert one, and two. It's a bit late to block you though, so just be more careful in the future. east718 // talk // email // Yes, those are two reverts; however, the 1RR restriction on myself was only in regards to Canadian monarchy articles, and PoC's edits, not to other pages or other editors. Now, though I was technically within my bounds there, having later read MangoJuice's comments to PoC on reverting and entitlement, I realise that the same applies to myself, and would have applied earlier. That second revert was a kneejerk retaliation to a move that was purposefully irritating, and, though technically allowed, was just a continuation of a dispute, rather than an effort to seek resolution. Anyway, I hope that clears things up. Sorta like the 24.X fella seems to be a single purpose IP editor.... reverting to his own version on several articles. A similar modus operandi to the 24.X IP fella you blocked the other day. Do you concur that this IP is a ""my way or the highway"" editor? And can a nail belt be thrown across his current road? -speak politely Again, I don't think it's the same person. The edit-warring sure merits a block though. east718 // talk // email // Oh I didn't think it was the same person. Just the exact same bad habits. As always... thanks for all your assistance! Have a nice day! -speak politely User:EricV89/TeenWiki Cabal I plan on taking this to DRV, just to let you know. The ""policy"" rationale given was without any explanation at all, as I pointed out in the discussion itself. Just saying it's so doesn't make it so. And from the page creator himself: Keep - It's a humourous cabal nothing more. Not meant for socialization, only discussions on how to improve Wikipedia among teen editors. eric (mailbox) He made the intent clear. He even edited the page to remove some of the parts that people had concerns about. The deletion supporters have nothing more than an assertion without any evidence. I don't really think that flies. Some people in favor of deleting did provide explanations: ""There is absolutely no intent [of improving the encyclopedia] here. It's purely a social page.""; ""makes no indication of how it will improve Wikipedia"". Despite EricV89's claim that it was meant for ""only discussions on how to improve Wikipedia among teen editors,"" this idea never saw a genesis +" The original velocity posted 14 Nov 2001 didn't have either feet per second or meters per second, just "" Velocity: 27,875 kph (17,321 mph)"", numbers which remained until Dink87522's edit. So the 7,643 should have been 7,743, and it was here that way by the time this was split from Space Shuttle Program. That 27,875 km/h = 7743+ m/s = 25,404 ft/s, but probably not to that precision. " +Hi Hello, Miranda! Nice to see you! +The same stalking editor, Pgagnon999 is now engaged in the same behavior. Why should any user have to accept stalking by another user129.133.124.199 +" So....you are a Japanese woman who uses the English and ""Ameriucan"" (sic) versions of the term ""Period"". Let's take the definition from Wikipedia itself on ""Full Stop"": ""A full stop or period (sometimes stop, full point or dot), is the punctuation mark commonly placed at the end of several different types of sentences in English and many other languages."" So, saying ""Period/Full Stop"" is the same as saying ""Period/Period"" or typing ""./."", interesting. While this has been great fun, I would rather talk to someone who a slight amount of sense, maturity, and able to speak proper English and not butcher the English Language (both British and American versions) and not get them confused. So, Good Day to you, Ma'am. - " +or was mistaken on a crucial detail +Are you talking about Thatcher's apparent decision to sanction all parties regardless of guilt? +Yakety Yak Here's a glove slap: +Please do not vandalize pages If you have an interest in particpating in the discussion regarding , then do so, but please refrain from vandalizing pages. +" I do wonder at times if i would be full of candy if poked... I'll get one up in a bit =) —dy " +" Congratulations from STiki! Congratulations, Onel5969! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! ‑  " +" Again, not that natal women have the same HIV risk as TG/TS women... but rather that the total number of females contracting HIV is the same as the total number of MSM contracting HIV. Source? http://www.avert.org/usastatg.htm Looking over the data, sorry, I correct my statement. Being female who only has risky heterosexual sex has the same HIV contraction rate as being a male drug user. Both total populations are unknown however. Again, my assertion stands, many TG/TS are not males, and thus are not MSM. Your own sources state that TG/TS groups are only ""considered"" ""alongside"" MSM, not that they actually are MSM. As to Benji: my statements were made on my own talk page, and were not intended to be neither neutral nor unbiased. If HFarmer wished to discuss the merits of the argument in this talk page, I would have been more than civil... however, she has consistently sought to put me in the worst situation possible and provoke me into an emotional response. My assertion has, and always will be ""I am not male, thus I am not MSM by definition of the term"". She can argue all she wants until she's blue in the face whether they are included or not in MSM statistics, but that's only making a lighter assertion, ""they are included in MSM statistics"", however her very own source says that they are not considered MSM, even though they may be included in MSM statistics. I understand the difficulty in understanding the situation... they're saying they're not, but then treating them as if they are, however the fact still remains, many if not most TS/TG individuals are excluded from MSM by the very definition of the term... ""men who have sex with men."" " +" Here, There and Everywhere and I've Been Everywhere Markie Banned The below IP for this. WOW!!! Abuse of block privilege. He will probably block this IP also. Yippee Skippee Do not be a Roscelese and Binksinternet Patsy − You may have been mislead by some extremist editors and you have in effect become their Patsy. The other alternative is you are a cohort of them. If that is the case you should resign as an admin if you cannot maintain a neutral balance. You need to do some more research on their backgrounds before reacting to their complaints further if the first applies. Locking down articles is a weak way of silencing opposing opinions especially when it is discussions for deletions like Gatestone Institute. You have track record of locking down articles for Roscelese. Please understand what a sock puppet is and is not. I have no control of my IP and will never adopt a wiki account do to the political environment. I will participate as long as IP's are allowed. The foundation knows getting rid of IP Editors would be counterproductive and Wiki's relevance would diminish greatly. Whine about it if you must but it is a futile waste of time that could be spent productively editing which seems to be limited to fewer and fewer registered editors. More editors are becoming part agenda pushing factions, please consider that also. Do no take this critic negatively as it is meant to improve Wikipedia. I hope you give it serious consideration. Thanks if you do that. You can ban this IP if you like if you feel you must silence criticism but I have millions to choose from and you effectively ban someone else from contributing to wiki. In other words it would be a pointless counterproductive pursuit that would shine a spotlight on you. As Muhammad Ali said ""I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee."" But my critic is valid. 172.56.11.140 " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Card game. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +I don't agree with you slandering my name and calling me a liar. Your one Happy son of a gun if you catch my drift. +Christmas Programs I know the Benny Christmas shows were popular in their time: radio stations throughout the country ran transcriptions of them for many years during the holiday seasons. Mel Blanc played a store clerk driven to the brink by Benny's shopping demands the Christmas before but coincidentally now starting at a branch of the same franchise that Benny is about to visit. +"31, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Hopefully many will read beyond the blurb. But it has happened the people have gotten upset about the state of the article and voted it off. We'll see what happens. There was an argument made once somewhere (can't recall where or when) that General or Introduction articles don't need to be cited because they are just a summary of general knowledge that anyone with a general background in those areas would know. I haven't checked the citation level in the article, but I suspect more citation is probably needed regardless if I were entering a declaration on that TFA/R, I'd probably take a closer look and Oppose, but you've convinced me that we shouldn't be entering declarations! (Talk) 11:" +Citation, Consensusn Hello. I have removed the text you added here. As you can see, it broke the page. I was unable to fix your references for you, as they are incomplete. When you cite sources, you need to provide more than just the book title and an author's name. If nothing else, you also need the page number, particularly when you are quoting (as you appeared to be doing in several places). You might be interested in looking at , specifically, and more generally Wikipedia:Citing sources. When adding material to article, please also read the text they already contain and work your material in such as to create a comprehensive whole. I see from the above that there may be some concerns about the nature of the content that you are trying to add to the article as well. Please consider discussing these concerns with other editors at the talk page of the article, Talk:Haida. Wikipedia's articles are developed according to consensus of its contributors, and such conversation is a valuable part of reaching that consensus. Occasionally, where editors disagree, additional dispute resolution may be necessary. (talk) +" There is big difference the Megali Idea probably surpassed itself, whereas the Greater Albania was never realized. Of course the editors will have different feelings. But you get very excited with the Greater Albania though, don't you?   " +"Jesus, who came in me like a body my perfect size when I was 32, which is the ACTS 2:38 born again Holy Ghost baptizm, spoke and birthed and created, ministry of dreams, after I prayed, I asked Jesus what to call it, and God spoke, after several days, ""call it ministry of dreams"". My name is bob hickman, of indianapolis, and ministry of dreams incorporated, the one Jesus created for.[Ministry of Dreams home page]" +November 2009 Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +get a proper job daft cunt +Danny Wallace Hi Ian, I have added in a new photograph to replace the image of Danny Wallace that you took at an event last week. This was at the request of Danny, who likes the picture, but thinks it is a bit too blurry. The picture now on his wikipedia is his official photo. Message me with any questions. +...just another confirmation that the ordinal numbering of the pharaohs with the same name is one of the greatest crimes committed by Egyptologists... +Are you asking my which images I used or what the actual ribbons I used? +Not at all. But you really prove to be anti-Romanian person. +" Nomination of Cold Fusion (Doctor Who) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cold Fusion (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (You may or may not be interested in this ""debate"", I didn't start it of course) " +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): This user is obviously a serious contributor, working simultaneously to remove the unwanted Jews from Wikipedia Request handled by: 222.153.100.166 Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request." +go fuck yourself john cline sucks cock +Is there an article about that type of raw file? +, and I'm not biting. +|Vorox the Glatorian]] Vorox the Glatorian +I've just looked up Thurston Harris and I don't think he was very widely known over here in the UK. I'm afraid that being his grandchild doesn't give you notability. (Being Prince Philip's grandchild does, but life's like that. Please don't fling accusations of racism around when you don't know what race we are - at least, you don't know what I am. Please calm down and take in what I have told you. We want more articles here, but there are rules to follow. This isn't what a lot of people think it is - a place to post what you want (like Facebook is). This is an encyclopaedia, and we insist on notability, and it's OUR definition of notability that applies. No room for negotiation. No 'article now, notability tomorrow'. Please don't rant again. The next admin passing by might decide to lock off your access to this page (which we can do, but I haven't). +No chance == People, you have no chance to stop that POV pushers. Source:Chip Berlet, SlimVirgin, and Wikipedia Berlet is secondary source for everything and criticism of him is reason for ban. == +" I also asked whether you were giving an assessment on your talk page but there was no response. talk " +Did you read what Mel said above? +Well, investigating was exactly what was written. There was nothing else implied in this other than that, nor was there anything implied in the NY Times, or ABC ciations that were used for verifiability. As far as investigating a famous person goes, all I can say is that Al Gore isn't just some random famous person. He is a former Vice President of the United States of America, and if we remember correctly, he came within a few hundred Dade County votes of becoming the President of the United States of America. Then let us remember that this isn't a normal Beverly Hills investigation into drunk driving or spousal abuse. This is an investigation of a felony, that carries with it lots and lots of jail time. No probation for this offense. You just can't compare it to what goes on in Hollywood. +I just saw the message about this that you previously left on my page. I'm sorry for not replying - it looks like between you writing that and the next time I read wikipedia someone else added a message so when I saw the 'new message' notice I only looked at that diff and missed yours. Anyway, I'm not that great at assembling great prose (my boss is always slagging off my proof-reading), but I have been doing some fact checking to try to ensure that everything in the article is correct and, where possible, sourced. I hope it becomes a FA, I know that you have put a lot of work into the article in recent months. I'm not sure whether I'm allowed to vote as I have a very obvious bias. +Boudhanath also now refers to the whole area or surrounding neighbourhood. A more specific title like Boudhanath Stupa might be better. +Congratulations and many thanks. Which reminds me that I want to fax or email you an extract from a book. So much to do, so little time. - +Request for help over sanskrit caption of R&AW; Hello, I would request you to kindly look into the devnagri seal caption of R&AW;, which is given as धर्मो रक्षति रक्षित for Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitaha. I wish to know if it is correct in devnagri script. The english caption is correct, also can you tell the meaning of the motto in english +Are you kidding me? Are you people completely stupid or what? +Happy to join in the fun! I wasn't planning to start a new article, but Jessie Piazzi Smyth seemed to need one. Penny Richards +I am sorry I am just in a hurry, i don't find the reason for me t edit talk pages, only articles. +WP:Fringe Are you aware of this notice board? You might, for instance, want to ask others there to take a look at Unexplained human mutilation, +" Gender Neutral Article Ships may be referred to either using female pronouns (""she"", ""her"") or neuter pronouns (""it"", ""its""). Either usage is acceptable, but each article should be internally consistent and employ one or the other exclusively. As with all optional styles, articles should not be changed from one style to another unless there is a substantial reason to do so. Please note that this article has been written with neutral-gender language. Please do not change the style to partly use female pronouns as that would make it internally inconsistent. If there is a compelling reason to change this entire article to female pronouns, please make the case on this Talk page first." +". At the end of the days ""fuck you"" is a pretty meaningless phrase, two words that the whole English speaking world has been desensitised to. I won't do it again, I just felt persecuted and confused as I was new to how Wikipedia works and confused." +, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Finally something constructive which seeks my input rather than ways to shut it down. Thank you for this. I will go ahead with this as soon as possible. 03:01 +Please rethink your action +I just spotted this new BBC story - it seems to have some more stats on the impact on shops etc which you might want to add to the article. | talk 19:54, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC) +"This is an archive of my talk page from June 2005. Please add new messages to my current page. Ed, Edd, n Eddy Hi, thanks for the note. No problem, it wasn't necessarily that difficult, took a bit of time, but thats fine. Although I know nothing of the show, just looked like something that had to be condensed/merged. Anyhoo, thanks for closing the Vfd, I'm sure you had plenty others to do that day. <> 00:25, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC) Thank You What a year! My first year in Wiki, a featured article and now administrator. Thank you for your support. I want to give you a special thanks for your kind comments during my nomination. You are blessed with wisdom and I'm proud to have gotten to know you through Wikipedia IFD Thanks for the update. With the recent decision by Jimbo, I agree that all unverified pics have to be deleted. Thanks for the good work. Talk 11:21, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC) Thanks Hey Kat, thanks for your kind words, and vote in support of my admin nomination. ☎ 13:17, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC) Re:FlaBot , not the impersonator. The bot was blocked due to the unresolved issues. I will cite my examples: , , , , , , , ... the list can go on. I don't know how many of these are valid or invalid. I do know for certain that the edit made at Doraemon was incorrect and made by (talk) 09:38, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) Furthermore, I find it highly suspicious that the contributions of the said impersonator F I a B o t (with the letter I, as in I for Impersonator) occurred 18 hours after I blocked FlaBot (with the letter L, as in L for Liar). (talk) 09:57, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) It's okay. Everyone makes mistakes... Administrators are not infallible people either. I'm just extremely careful when I use my administrative powers and check all my facts before taking any action. (talk) 20:43, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) CWRU music Hi, thanks for keeping me informed about the status of the CWRU music scene article; I've brought this up in discussion at Talk:Case_Western_Reserve_University#Music; is it the conclusion of the VfD on the music scene article that the list has no business in any part of wikipedia, or could it be somehow condensed and listed at the main CWRU article in the music section? If there's no way it can appear on wikipedia, then I suppose I can try to put it on wikicities somewhere, though I doubt there's anywhere it would really fit. I'm not interested (anymore) in having a writeup for each band, but a comprehensive list of musical perform +Now that Marc has seen the light, it's time for me to ask you, Terry0051. What is your source for the allegation that whether something is convex or concave depends on the perspective of the observer (or whether it's outward or inward, or however you want to phrase it)? - +" And mine? which I stole from Tiptoety « Cøøkie''' " +Yes, I was exposing the Monday Club for the Mosleyite Pan-European facists they really are. +WHat sare you guys talking about that i not cool. +" Just for the heads-up apropos the above promise by certain users not to add the term ""British Isles"", " +" NPOV concerns I tend to agree with the NPOV concerns of some comments here. They seem to be more along the lines of what is *not* included than what is. To be fair, a google search returned far more of the 'critical' sources than any other. However, I was able to make a minor edit I regard as an improvement. I replaced one Guardian article, ""Iran contra men return to power"" with another from the same publication, the ""Negroponte: Amercia's voice of experience"" article. I believe the former article is redundant to many of the others, and as the least specific to Mr. Negroponte is the least relevent. The latter article I believe balances the collective tone of the references, and does not omit mention of the Honduras accusations. However, I have retained the old article here: ""Iran-contra men return to power""(from The Guardian) If anyone sees the need to restore it." +{unblock|reason=Your reason here left account signed in while i was away from computer, my friend messed then used my account to vandlise} +| class=start | importance=low +" AWARD OF THE PURPLE HEAD TO TOMSTAR81 We of Wikipedia suck up admin staff felt that for your courageous and forthright censorship of truthseekers was exemplary and deserved reconition on the time honoured traditions of facist dictators and mass murderers by giving you a badge award. This Badge you see above the ""Purple Head"" can be worn on the front of your forehead. Without your speedy and diligent banning of users like Truthseekers Wiki might gain some factual and unbiased information and this is something that we at Wiki are keen to avoid. Users who can block and ban newcomers without question and then fend them off without providing good rerasons are exactly the calibre of sanshonest leaders we require and should you ever require any help with blocking hundreds of thousands of people - please feel free to call on any facist aligned admin at any time. , ," +Real Steel Video Game Yuke’s Co., Ltd made a Real steel (based on the movie of the same name) video game and i put it on the list of Yuke’s video games of 2011 and some douche delete it +" I think reference number 191 is not that number any more. I think the reference that Octopet referred to is the WHO one (at least it contains this list of ""diseases, symptoms or conditions for which acupuncture has been proved through controlled trials to be an effective treatment""). However, this (peculiarly bold) WHO statement is less authoritative than the underlying medical literature (per WP:MEDRS), so I don't understand all this ruckus. ""Clinical trials have so far produced little evidence for the efficacy of TCM therapies, such as acupuncture."" still sounds very accurate to me. " +"my talk page == why did you change my talk page to a block that has expired? this is my page the block has expired. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) == " +" Acknowledged, but creating user preferences for scripts takes some work, so this likely won't be done any time soon. I suppose you could invite other users of the script and the WP:ORPHANAGE participants here and build a consensus for if it should reload by default and if it should just reload or reload to diff. — {{U|}} (e • t • c) " +Vaginas Do you have a problem with vaginas? 68.0.119.139 +Review Sathagiri Express, Renigunta Junction railway station pages. +heyyy heeeyyyy buddy ... i`m tryna find somethin to edit lmao +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  (Talk) +Aftermath Nearly 20 years after the Eastland sank-a Judge only allowed survivors the amount of damages from the estimated value of the ships worth. +" No, neither of those other Pythons directed any Potter movies. But, neither of them were favorites of Rowling, as Gilliam was. She wanted Gilliam to direct one, or more, of the movies, but was shot down. Therefore, it is relevant. -''''''The'FortyFive' " +" _______________________________________________________________________________ Headline text Attention: Sandra [[User:69.11.10.188| When indicating ""passing"" in your statement above, could you please respond to the following questions re:the various registries you have referenced: 1)What do you mean by ""passing"". Do the registries disallow breeding of dogs who have higher than your indicated ratings? How do the registries gather the individual scores of each of their breeding dogs? How do the registries ""enforce"" these requirements? 2) Could you state what testing organization(s)are accepted by each registry for these ""passing"" grades? Your ""grades"" indicate they are probably OFA scores, but how are Penn-Hip scores treated in the registries, since this testing is also being used with Shiloh Shepherds, from what has been previously mentioned in this discussion? 3) What are your references for your gathered information; that is to say, what are the web page addresses for the various registries where this info is stated as required/enforced/recommended? 4) Most importantly, since the term ""required"" calls for a resource by which adherence to this ""requirement"" can be enforced, could you also please provide the resources through which interested puppy buyers can confirm testing results for the individual dogs (or their parentage) they are interested in purchasing. Whether claimed as required or not by whichever registries or breeders, these claims have no value (other than through ""blind trust"") to potential puppy buyers unless they have an opportunity to verify the results themselves through independent means. In other words, if a reader wants to research the hip ""grades"" of the parents of a puppy they are considering buying (not generic group testing results) would you please indicate where that information can be found for each of the registries (NSBR, ISSR, TSSR)? Example: NSBR - Hip registration is primarily through OFA. To view OFA's hip information on NSBR dogs, please view website address www.xxxxxx.org"" AND ISSR - Hip registration is through OFA and Penn-Hip. To view OFA's hip information on ISSR dogs, please view website address www.xxxxxx.org. To view Penn-Hip's hip information on ISSR dogs, please view website address www.zzzzz.org "" AND TSSR - Hip registration is conducted through XXXX, however individual results are provided to prospective and current puppy owners by submitting a Request for Health Results Form, available at www.TSSR.com/Request for Health info. 4)If verification of these requirements for the registries is not published nor can be obtained in writing, would you also please indicate this policy. If you can only provide resource information for a registry you are affiliated with, I would then ask that other discussion participants (i.e. registry members or non-affiliated breeders) provide this information and their policies in answer to my requests above. Thank you very kindly. M.Dùfy __________________________________________________________________________________" +Holy (BH)G! I hadn't seen that...thanks. ( ) +I can't believe this guy located in some little town outside the US frontiers is allowed to select the things i can say and the ones i can not. This would not have happened if this individual were located within US frontiers. His poor command of the language tells me he is doing this just for the fun of it, cause i doubt he is even able to understand or even read what i write. I recommend you choose the censors among people that can at least speak English +Adoption Greetings wana adpot me?96.235.179.193 +" 2008 WikiProject Birds June 2008 Newsletter The June 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.This has been an automated delivery by Spider webs in space As per the talk page of spider webs in space, i am considering merging the article into spider web. I saw you had considerable objection towards the previous merge, so i decided to inform you here so you could input. Best, The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXVII (May 2008) The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.This has been an automated delivery by WP:HAU Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, , was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) Request to extend block link ' message Oops, that's a misread by me. I'll block for some months. Cheers, Talk Extended to 3 months. Cheers, Talk Thanks. WP:WHACK! Sorry to hear about your health issues. Do you still want to be listed at HAU? ' message Yeah. I'm generally ok, and I'll remain active enough to be listed. Thanks for your concern. Cheers, and happy editing, Talk Cat Last year I gave the article a big heave and was nibbling at it again two weeks ago. I'll get back into it shortly. Much of what we need is already there. Well, I jumped in with quite a lot of edits today. (Thank you for the poke in the butt—'bout time I did some work on a cat again.) There's a thread on the talk that could use some feedback. No worries. I think the taxonomy section is now just about done. I have to say one thing though: I actually tend to avoid zoos and conversation charities when editing the cats. For simple things like coat colour, OK, but not for the hard science. Try to find abstracts and/or b +" According to your profile, you are fluent in Dutch. So let me ask you: are you Dutch? For if you are, you should not be involved with Bosnia articles, for obvious historical reasons such as Srebrenica massacre (by the same token of prejudice you use on that noticeboard for grouping all the ""Balkans people"" based on some Macedonia issue). Clearly, I'm asking so that I can report you for abuse of administrative privileges, again based on the same type of argument you use when arbitrarily relating Macedonia to Bosnia to Dalmatia to Kosovo to... the ""Balkans"". Your nationality, please? " +" I agree with you on most of what you said, but I also think that the Crucifix roll up should remain and the Springboard into a double axe handle should remain, becuase she uses those frequently aswell. Every thing else can go e.g like the generic ""Double Clothesline""." +Maybe I even add some vandalism By adding bands you conside 'nobodies' but even so that every band has the right to be on an information database. To consider some underground and some popular is just plain indecisive with good measure, maybe I will just go metal and free all the prisoner to kill all the haters that endure this frequent fight make the right action and decision now, without having a fright this will be your greatest ever, on this site make it if you will to be awful as you choose but bare this in mind you have me to contend to. (I think I am going mad) +Blocked for truth seeking! This user should be unblocked because we should never tolerate censorship 31.209.16.177 +" 7 September 2006 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ✍ " +" Isn't that exactly the point? One's ""perception"" is not necessarily the reality of the situation. I can be looking at a doughnut and, in my perception, it is a canary. That's just my perception. In reality, it is a doughnut, regardless of my perspective and regardless of what I think it is. No? " +" Can I get some diffs? I had some trouble finding more bad-faith edits than good. 64 " +Thanks for the detailed answers I should have known you'd have done your homework. - +REDIRECT Talk:Rensselaer William Foote +No I was not, I was raising a legitimate concern, but thanks for assuming good faith. Unblock +I have no idea what are you talking about. we are talking about Geber right? during his life-time he lived under the rule of Ummaya and Abbassed. and this is the only thing should be mentioned. I have no idea why we should mention all Iranian dynasties? you lost me. +" What do you mean? (talk) " +May 2006 (UTC) You should look more carefully at the edit history. That link was added on October 15, 2005 by 01:11, 26 +" Gwen Gale, you are blocking me for the comments I made to Dayewalker. You called that 'scathing,' yet you ignored Republican Jacobite. If you can come back now and claim I've made another personal attack, can you again excuse Republican Jacobite? Has he been blocked?Malke2010 " +Quit censoring or get reported== Removing the porn scandal background is AGAINST wiki policies. == +April 2009 Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +" Hey Dino ""Other critics of the Clintons have made more lurid allegations: that Foster's death was not a suicide, that it was connected to Whitewater, and that Hillary Clinton was somehow involved by covering up activities together with Foster before his death [27] or in that her relationship with Foster was an intimate one [28]. Other conspiracy theories claimed that she had killed Foster herself [29] or had him killed [30]. No credible evidence or charges were ever brought forward in connection with any of these allegations."" - " +This page needs a major re-write. Its contents are controversial, yet the discussion of the controversial aspects does not cite references. Some of the the sub topics fail to justify how they help explain the primary topic, instead they mention tangential controversy wihout satisfactorily connecting that controversy with the subject matter. For example, mention of the Reimer case does not contribute to the sub matter here. Another example would be failure to cite the actual Johns Hopkins articles, the evidence of their bias and lack of scientif rigor, or the various subsequent studies that refute the Johns Hopkins article, which is over 25 years old and out dated at best. Also few other topics on medical procedures spend so much time discussing external opinions about them made by religious extremists, who lack medication education. Those few might only be abortion and invitro fertilization. 21:43, 14 September 2006 +Jetstreamer: you can go and fuck yourself you stupid sick bastard homo! +" Gaza Strip The source you restored, ""Why does Israel supply Gaza with electricity and cement?"", is an opinion piece, not a news article. Per WP:NEWSORG, a section of Wikipedia's guideline concerning reliable sources, opinion pieces are not considered reliable sources for statements of fact. The source you added, ""Guide: Gaza under blockade"", does not support the information in the sentence you restored. —  Talk/Stalk " +REDIRECT Talk:Reduced instruction set computer +What a bunch of wanker's +" As well as removing a surplus parenthesis, your edit reinserted a link to a band called ""The Canned Goods"" whose article has been deleted as non-notable. If there is no corresponding article, a ""Wikilink"" shows red, and is referred to as a redlink, in contrast to a bluelink to an existing article. I reverted your edit because I thought you were trying to re-insert ""The Canned Goods"". I didn't notice the extra parenthesis, but I have fixed it now. Regards, " +How do you know? How do YOU know so much about Johnny Test? A lot of people watch the series and they know more about it than YOU ever will. talk 12:02 pm, 12 October 2009 (UTC) +Genealogists routinely make the mistake of assuming that the father-of-record is necessarily the biological father. However, this is not always the case in polygamous Mormon culture, as wives are officially and unofficially shifted from man to man. Even sisters have been traded. We will never really know the full extent of what went on in the Mexican Mormon colony the Romneys sprang fromof course, that was precisely why the left the United States to begin with. It makes sense, of course, that Romney and his political operatives would want to keep these issues from the American people. +" Don't trust what the ""Hell Angels"" say? Fine MF, there is a reference from the black community saying the same thing, with pictures. I don't trust what you say, because you're a prejudice A-hole." +. If I come to your talk page, please reply there. If you come to me, then I'll leave a talkback on your page +" wikipedia entry on ten-string guitar can no longer be considered reliable It has been a battle to keep the wikipedia entry on ""ten-string guitar"" from being turned into the usual farce that one expects of the ""information"" presented in both wikipedia and most sites that purport to be about the 10-string guitar (both being 'littered with inaccuracies' and even deliberate misinformation). For the time being, I must devote my energies to the final stages of my Doctoral studies and let the fools play at being pseudo-musicologists on wikipedia. It is, however, a disgrace that the first two pages through which most online readers are introduced to ""the ten-string guitar"" (that is wikipedia and Janet Marlow's tenstringguitar(dot)com) are riddled with inaccuracies, untenable claims, and (as shown in a previous blog) even deliberate distortion of Narciso Yepes's words in an attempt to misrepresent the historical and scientific facts of the matter. Since I've spoken out about this disinformation, I note that my main page here has suspiciously been deleted from most google search listings containing the terms ""10-string guitar"" or ""ten-string guitar"". Some of our American ""colleagues"" evidently don't like the truth coming out about their dishonest ""scholarship"". As for wikipedia, be advised that I no longer oversee the accuracy of the ""ten-string guitar"" page and this should now be considered as unreliable as most of the other misleading ten-string guitar sites. The person presently responsible for the (from a musicological/organological point of view) misinformative wikipedia entry is Andrew Alder, whose musical ""expertise"" as far as I can gather is limited to playing drums and rhythm guitar in his local Sydney Anglican church. Yet he too deems himself an ""authority"" who is in a position to ""educate"" readers about the 10-string guitar (an instrument he has no doubt never played). It is exactly this problem with wikipedia (that any lay person can edit it and can even become an administrator if they have too much free time on their hands and are willing to kiss enough derriere) that has caused it to be banned by universities and to be blamed for ""making kids dumb"" and for falling grades of students who turn to this misinformative online ""encyclopaedia"" for research. [] Click here for Article in The Scotsman about wikipedia's role in descending grades amongst students. " +" While I agree that blocking this address (which happens to be a shared proxy) due to vandalism is correct, the indefinite block for the reason that it is a sockpuppet of ""Dan Equaliser"" must be invalid, as it is a shared proxy used by many commercial and non-commercial users of the proxy service (which I believe is Messagelabs)." +" Whew. That was a learning curve. As of tonight, I now know how to do tables. If you're curious, you use < table > < tr > < td > stuffstuffstuffcolumn1 < /td> < td > stuffstuffstuffcolumn2 < /td> < td > stuffstuffstuffcolumn3 < /td> < /tr > < /table > The td tag has all the good stuff like < td valign = ""top"" width = ""200"" >. Took me forever to figure out that I had to put < poem > tags around the stuffstuffstuff, i.e., < td > < poem > stuffstuffstuffcolumn1 < /poem> < /td> for each column. " +Your recent edit to Ska (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ''' for frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // +This too: Thanks for your warnings! ) +Weak I sense much weakness. If there were a Barnstar of Weakness, I would grant it to you daily. Nay, thrice daily—breakfast, lunch, and tea. Never mind that. Biggest question right now? Is Greece itself a Russian and Chinese Trojan Horse? Are you slippery eels reverting to type? +Hello, About Sartine, that is my impression as well, and I have left a note in the francophone Wikipédia to that effect. I do very much enjoy these little mysteries, but I am a little bit apprehensive at not being able to answer some of your inquiries; I suppose that this is inevitable at the granularity level we are reaching, but I would much rather have bottomless sources from which to quecnh our thrist. I have been unable to find anything on Coromandel, and none of the number of Modeste seem to match, unfortunately. On the other hand, I am going to put up a little article for Henriette with what I have. Cheers! +I LOVE FATTY SEX MMMM +and targeting of me for false reasons +" Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Wenham-Jones Jane Wenham-Jones, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! — You need to establish on the article lead section why this person is considered notable. Check out WP:CREATIVE for guidelines. — " +Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumpswing (2nd nomination) Since you have edited Swing related articles in Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumpswing (2nd nomination). +Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Wikiproject trains Okay, to join you have to add your name to though you don't have to be a member to edit pages, obviously. The best thing you can do is watch the wikiproject trains site for any announcements click here and similary add things you're interested in to your watchlist. I can tell you about images as well if you like. What is your interest area? +1993 CIN Single? Where does it say that I Wouldn't Normally Do This Kind of Thing was the official CIN single for 1993? +The unfortunate truth is that it is through this exact behavior that wikipedia becomes less relevant and less useful than necessary, because the people in power are not the ones who are knowledgeable, but just the ones who happen to have spent more time taking up with Shit like this. +" 1. a) Easy answer: go to the user talk page, create a new section, and put this; {{subst:The Original Barnstar|put your message here ~~~~}} b) There's lots more choices; see Wikipedia:Barnstars - if you want to give me a barnstar here, that's absolutely fine. 2. It's best to put the barnstar on the user talkpage - and let them move it to their user page, if they wish to do so.  ►  " +" Gyrofrog is not a netural editer he/she always changing the truth. Some people ""NOT ME"" might call him a lier isn must repeat not me! Gyforg has a problem with people challenging He Or she views therefore he/she hides behind warnings etc Well i warn him that continuing his desire to remove is futile attempt to stop the truth, and beware stoping the truth might be a personal attack, i would say it a observation." +". It might be informative, but it is not notable (WP:N). Just having external links, or by extension, existing, doesn't mean it has reliable sources (WP:IRS). If you can find reliable sources (New York Times, BBC, CNN, Fox News, and a lot of other similar news organizations. A lot of things fall under this category.) this article would be notable. talk " +" myth.....misconceptoin....whatever. von daniken asserted that not only a ""metallic library,"" but also a whole cache of golden artifacts were secreted in the caves. to the best of my knowledge, NONE of these artifacts have been unearthed. and von daniken later admitted that he lied in ""gold of the gods,"" that he had never BEEN in the caves himself......................" +You don't have to dig up examples if you don't want to, I believe you. ) I read you loud and clear. Yeah, I forgot about closing the AFD, I won't forget next time. Thanks for the compliment, I do what I can. ) Talk +by the way this is a university computer.. so go ahead and block it cock sucker. i'll just use my home computer to let the world know what a stupid asshole you are. FUCK OFFFF DICKBAG. +" Using obscene and abusive signing comments such as ""fuck off"" (as you did on Jan 20)is a clear violation of Wikipedia policy. This could potentially result in your being blocked, or otherwise sanctioned. (That is unless your pal Binksternet sees them first and erases them for you, as he has done to so many of your previous outbursts of obscenity.) Don't reply on my page to this post because I do not wish to discuss with you personally. Why? I am not interested to get into personal discussions, if you have questions about my edits please post a comment in the talk page of the specific article (that would be right here) and I will gladly respond. " +MuYou suck asshole ch +all along on the article's talk page (and Joy was aware of them at some point in the past) +" Unblock Oh hell, no. I got blocked for ""edit warring, harassment"". The ""edit warring"" was to remove a personal attack by and which then become comment-removal vandalism by . I made this abundantly clear, both on Hipocrite's and TOny Sidaway's talk pages. I WAS COMPLETELY IGNORED BY THE BLOCKING ADMIN, accused of a policy violation by Hipocrite, and censored when I tried to defend myself. THIS IS RIDICULOUS. (Karwynn) " +... (personal attack removed) ... +" Rhobite, I think the word ""great"" may be confusing you. Sure, what's great for me isn't necessarilly great for you; but when something is great for the many, the qualification becomes objective. Hellmuth is regularly the chosen televised table, and was invited to this year's tournament of champions event (despite not qualifying) solely for his television appeal. He currently has logged more minutes on ESPN than any other player. I'm sorry if you don't know this subject well enough to understand it, but Hellmuth is univerally known and agreed to produce great television. If I watched Michael Jordan play basketball and thought he was bad, it would not change the fact that he could be objectively described as a ""great"" basketball player. Please stick to material that you understand well enough to be able to determine what is subjective and what is not. I see in your profile that you are interested in photography; I'm sure there are plenty of photography related sections that you could do better work with." +Why not unambiguosly refer to him as a bigot? I can't see that there is any doubt given what's already quoted in the article, and numerous references. It appears to be his defining feature. AGF? Loosing me there ... the financial investment company? +Lower the capacity many good stadiums are being left out of this list because the capacity limit is too restricting, I propose that It be halved to 10,000 and will make it so untill further discussion +Watch out for the hijackers Fadix, THOTH, Latinus, Khoikhoi, nikosilver, Hectorian etc. They are ganging up against topics related to Turks and take turns in a revert war in order to avoid violating the 3rr. These not so cunning group of Armenians, Greeks and their friends are racist Turk haters and are keen to sully any topic that is even remotely related to Turks. Please be vigilent on these serial hijackers, they operate in tandem! +Kiss my Ass cline wtf did others do to you +" IP block extensions While I completely agree that 81.151.85.109's edits were horrid, I gave a short block specifically to avoid collateral damage with someone else that may inherit the IP. 48 hours is a very, very long time for an editor who has shown a pattern of editing from multiple IP addresses. I won't reverse it, but I urge you to reconsider it. // talk // // " +{reply to:Midnightblueowl}Thanks and I completely agree, in future I reckon additions to the UKIP infobox definitely ought to be debated somewhere first, this party's beliefs are clearly a contentious issue. Indeed, this is, in my view, down to the fact all mainstream British parties (left and right) nowadays seem to have become obfuscated and tergiversating in this respect, an alienating nimbus of lies and dishonesty hanging prominently above British politics. I think I was pushing it with British nationalism (I admit my zealous and brash pursuit of a place for it on the page was inadvertently due to bias, I am a communist and strongly against the whole of the political right) and the source was tenuous for that point. However, civic nationalism I had not heard of and would be glad to see it on the page as it seems to be an appropriate descriptor of their views. I am also glad to note social conservatism and anti-immigration seem to have been restored to the UKIP page. My handling of this matter was brash and inappropriate and again I apologise to all involved. I will be much more reluctant to report users in future and shall educate myself in the appropriate way to go about it. Thanks, +Whilst I'll always assume LFC to be the first team to have adopted the YNWA chant (like most LFC fans with most Celtic fans probably disagreeing), I think reviewers on this talk page are putting too much emphasis needlessly on the importance of who sang it first. I presume no-one submitting is a minor. Suffice to say, the easiest way round it has to be in how you word the English. Why not... It was on the 1960's Kop that it is widely believed that LFC fans were the first to take the YNWA song to their hearts, adopting as an anthem. We have to bear in mind that most people around the World will never have heard about Glasgow Celtic, let alone their glory years, except in reference to them being the club that sold Liverpool King Kenny Dalglish. Dalglynch-72 +Well, i live in Uruguay and it is commonly believed that black are good at music and dancing. I don´t think it´s only the case in the USA, i think is worldwide. +No, not a working link, but the one must be able to identify the source. Which is not possible currently. Again, I am giving you some time to fix this. Please do so. +" However, I havn't got anything to support the Awards section, please add these if you have them!  (talk) " +Bot Fearow,I added a word to your DeadBot's bad word list-just trying to help. +" In addition, we do not use ""Top Critics"" from Rotten Tomatoes. We discussed this as a community at WT:FILM, and it is a problematic score to use. (talk | contribs) " +" I am still involved. And, yes, I am busy. I hope to get back to this later today. ''' ✔Tea time''' " +you're a dick also how can you say jonathan pacheco shouldn't have a biography? you call yourself lucky 6.9 but i think lucky 6.5 is more appropriate...YOU'VE BEEN DOWNGRADED...SNAP BITCH!BUUUUUUUUUUURN! +Agreed. What if somebody pens a response to such, do we include that also? Must every item regarding the flag in 'The Orcadian' be referred to here? The 'new' flag has a status that its predecessor flag does not, and the fact that it has both detractors and supporters is neither here nor there. Revert. +I am issuing you a citation for violating WP rules. It is considered a personal attack to call for blocking. +THis is terrible Just rewrite the whole thing and don't forget SOURCES... woooweeee +For crying out loud BritshWatcher and IP, mountains and molehills spring to mind. +" me be nice The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar message " +" The following was also placed on דוד55 Talk Page - I note that on July 9 you amended the lists of categories of many of the recipients of the Israel Prize, by substituting the the category of ""Israel Prize in [a particular field] recipients"" for the simple ""Israel Prize recipients"". Whilst it is clear that, where applicable, the recipients should be allocated the more specific category indicating the field in which the prize was awarded, I believe that the general category should also remain to enable users to view a complete list of those recipients for whom there is an article. " +Modest Mouse documentary There is no evidence that this film is knowingly infringing copyright, and reason to suspect that it is not. It was uploaded to both You Tube and Google video, and linked by a legitimate documentary film site: . The You Tube uploader credited the director both in the description and at the end of the film. Uploader also stated that the film will never be released (it's not commercial length for a doc, in either tv50-60 minor theatrical release70 min plus). Nor is it a commerical filmit's superindie. The director died young of cancer (b. 1976-d. 2002). It looks like his friends or his family released the film after his death. It's been up, all over the internet, for a while now. In the absence of a complaint from 1) an inheritor of the copyright 2) Modest Mouse, stating that any music wasn't licensed, there's no reason this link shouldn't stay.- +WIKIPEDIA SUCKS WIKIPEDIA SUCKS WEENIES +" (And can we have a civil conversation about that, please, rather than throwing spurious uncivil perjoratives (""wikilawyering"") at each other?)" +Neutrality of the article & corrections Thank you so much for your time spent on my edits dear Bonadea. I`m an amateur in Wikipedia edits, as you understand. I'll try my best to correct my mistakes done in this article and not to do anymore while improving it that I don't waist your precious time. However my English is not great, so I'm really sorry for many wrongs & I need proper copy edit from professional, as living person - artist's article I do edit is very important to not edit it wrongly. Please forgive me my mistakes & if you find some time to guide me how to make my edits in article look enough NEUTRAL, I'll be very thankful. Anyway I try to learn much more to be able to do it myself as I'm enjoying contribution in Wikipedia. Thank you once more for all Kassai +Following the non-consensus on delete, I added the link back to this article on the List of LGBT-related organizations +I agree. Also, can you change the budget figure to 132 crore (official). That is not really disputed by anyone. +" awards this Barnstar to Bucketsofg for warning us what happens to an under-used mind. He is an inspiration to the rest of us to be good to our friends, so we don't have to spend every day and night on Wikipedia, hoping for a little human contact.]]" +toshiba why isn't here any mention on toshiba cooperation. +Your repeated WP:Consensus violation at the Antifreeze article As you can see, consensus is against you. As such, you need to stop violating it. 134.255.247.88 +You have been reported again 1. +" Thanks Thanks for your message on my talk page re: RfA reform and needing more admins. I think that, perhaps, one of difficulties with backlogs on WP:AIV is time of day. For example, I have almost never seen a backlog during EST evenings. Maybe we should have time zone of residence a factor in RfAs? ;-) TC " +User:Subhash -Your legal notice against me still sits on my userpage even after intervention from Blnguyen. I have not had any apologies from you as well.I am reporting you to Blnguyen for administrative action. +Endless edit/revert cycling on Half Dome Dear anonymous editor: you are adding material to the Half Dome article that does not follow the guidelines for Wikipedia editing, hence is constantly being reverted. It doesn't matter that you believe going off the cables is safer. It does not matter that Will and I believe this to be false. The important thing about Wikipedia is that the articles are verifiable (that is, any fact can be traced to a reliable source, such as a book or newspaper), and written in a neutral point of view (i.e., does not favor a particular set of opinions). If you wish to have your material stay in the Half Dome article, you have to come up with a reference that states that it is safer off the cables - you cannot rely on your own knowledge or intuition: you have to prove it to the rest of us. Further, if it is a controversial assertion (which this one is), then you need to phrase it as such. For example, if some association is favoring leaving the cables, then we could add: Association X claims that leaving the cable is safer than waiting, while the National Park Service wants people to stay on the cable for safety. Notice that this sort of phrasing does not talk about the absolute truth of whether it is safer or not: it reports who believes it to be safer and who does not. These should be official organizations or well-known experts - we can't cite random people in blogs, for example. Again, both of these assertions should be backed up with references. We can help you format the references, don't worry. I would urge you to find a reputable source that recommends leaving the cables. Until you do so, I predict that the unsourced assertion is so controversial that it will probably just be reverted on sight. Feel free to ask any more questions on Talk:Half Dome. Thanks! +" Then please assume that I made a mistake and that I forgot to notify you (which I did and I apologize for that). NaSp " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Elkhart Central High School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +Why are you harassing me? No. The arbcom decision, based on a lie, said I could only operate under one account. I was continually harassed so I switched to a new account and stopped editing under this one. I have not broken any policies. I have not edited any of the pages I used to edit because I knew you and Mackensen would immediately seek out confrontation. Why do you have to prove to the world that you are right, and no other opinion is allowed, after I stopped editing under Ya ya ya ya ya ya? Similarly you refuse to accept criticism so you vandalize my talkpage and revert every attempt to start an arbcom case on a blatant series of policy violations, and then you act like I'm not permanently banned. I let it (the arbcom case I tried to file three times) go when you began wikistalking me. I'm switching accounts again. You don't like it? Too bad. +" I also removed the ""1901"" listing on the note about the inscription on his tombstone - the 1903 date has been confirmed and is now listed by the Who's Who and Guinness Book of Records etc. It has even been corrected at findadeath.com." +Well user Burgass has done it again. Just look at this user's constant and strange behaviour in this article. +I don`t intent to introduce the part as it is right now, but to polish it up, add style and to copyedit it. You can help! Also, here is the broken link. +AND WHY AND HOW IS IT AND CAN IT BE THAT THE CONTROVERY SECTION IS LONGER THAN THE ENTIRE DESCRIPTION OF THE FIRM ? A FIRM WHICH IS FEATURED (VERY POSITIVELY) IN THE NEW YORK TIMES 2 PAGES ON A SUNDAY, AND BUSINESS WEEK (MOSTLY POSITIVE) 2 PAGES ? AND THE CONTROVERSY SECTION IS ALL THAT EXISTS ? WIKI EDITORS WAKE UP TO THE JEWS WHO ARE BIASED HERE. +I have posted this source , the report is in http://news.yahoo.com/moammar-gadhafi-loyalists-seize-libyan-town-124237599.html +I am a sock puppet? THAT is my ban reason? This is my only account, and thanks for ignoring the bulk of my text. Wikipedia IS corrupt AND populated by idiots. I am free to say this, so please refrain from saying anything like that again. I didn't get banned for trolling, or personal attacks, I got banned because I changed an article to NPOV when the far majority of the editors here would rather the see the BNP article as a diatribe denouncing the party. +Why don't you keep this lame way of talking in failchan? +"There is no ranking called ""OSS rankings"". All rankings that include Bogazici University are listed in the text. If you cannot come up with a better ranking methodology, you need to accept the best existing global university rankings. Even if you do not accept, you do not have the right to stop people access this information. " +"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The rid " +I should add - the globalize tag should stand even if the Jan 2 intro is restored, because the bulk of the article obviously remains very POV/unbalanced. Hopefully we're on the road to fixing that. Regards, +and as more than just cameos in those games, +" Nobody is suggesting he be referred to in the article as a ""pedo"" - which is just short for/slang for pedophile. Multiple reliable (non-tabloid) sources refer to him as a pedophile. What reliable sources support your claim that the term pedophile is being ""increasingly misused by the media to refer to a type of criminal"" and that it is being misused to refer to Ian Watkins? How exactly is it being misused? How does it not apply to Ian Watkins? YO 😜 " +Because it is an R&B; album, and Wikipedia's choice in reliable sources is retarded. +Ok I promise. Can you unblock me now? P +Requested Move Change it. Macedonian Transliteration should be used for all Macedonian articles. Alex +EF, you are confused. Folks with link envy will attempt to delete links of others even though they provide valid and relavant information to an article. I already mentioned that you should add valid info to the article be it a link or factual information. I waited patiently for you to respond to Wiki Editor Chrisrus's request to hear a Singer in song, but alas you dropped the ball. After weeks of waiting for your self proclaimed best and proper solution, I finally provided some sound and even added video yet it somehow does not sit well with you. I myself am not real big on citations as referencing info from a written or published article doesn't necessarily make it true. I also prefer folks with hands on experience as opposed to a researcher that absorbed a bunch of info from others to form an opinion. By all means pursue a better way and also be sure to send that Senior Wiki editor my way. I promose to let him or her know who I am and I am certain that you will do the same so that your NPOV will shine brightly. Best of luck at Maywood. It's tough to handicap there but with your equine expertese, I am confident you will do just fine. +Addendum: Now three editors, including +" IRC? Are you there now? † " +Unban Go to hell, Android79! I do not consider my edits vandalism! +" Occupation? changed to 'Inmate"". Hes an inmate now right? Far from a student anymore...? Or maybe just remove 'occupation'" +" Please do not create hoaxes. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. talk " +I've now added several reliable sources - including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, CNN, and Bloomberg Businessweek, standing for the proposition that this is a French film. +" I apologize for my comments to you in that discussion, it is a discussion not an RfC. You are quite right to engage anyone you choose. Again I am sorry.chitchat " +One: Comments were not made on the Douglas Feith talk page. I've never posted there. The comments were made on the Brian@popflux.com user page. Two: No personal attacks were made. I asked for clarification as to why you were calling people racist, and why you felt that unverified facts were ok to post on the Douglas Feith page, but not on the Crystal Gail Mangum page. You're response was to say that I was making personal attacks on you. +Vandalism You have vandalised the jajce article by deleting sourced information relating to the demographics of jajce. +" Thanks to both of you. I think that the average number of national newspapers per nation (781) is way too high. Even if we include the nations not recognised by the UN, I don't think it would decrease to a more realistic figure. For example, how many national newspapers does Great Britain have? I don't think it even comes close to a hundred. On the other hand maybe, as Bus stop said, each of the ten days is counted as a new occurrence. At least this would reduce the number by an order of magnitude.  λogosπraxis " +" Could you please stop removing the source? Thank you, MST☆ (Chat Me!) " +The SPLC’s Outright Telemarketing Scam PUBLISHED BY MICHAEL OLANICH, ON MARCH 31ST, 2015 telemarketing2014 ONE MONTH ago, we gave the Southern Poverty Law Center the benefit of the doubt concerning their dubious telemarketing practices. Today, with the release of their 2014 IRS Form 990 tax report, we cannot cover for their outright telemarketing scam any longer. On the right is the SPLC’s IRS Form 990 for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2014. For the fourth consecutive year, SPLC Founder Morris Dees, who bills himself as a “sound steward” of the donors’ money has deliberately scammed tens of thousands of well-meaning donors through his network of paid telemarketing rip-off artists. To wit, for the past four years Mr. Dees has continued his relationship with Grassroots Campaigns of Boston, Mass, despite the horrific hemorrhaging of donor dollars. Grassroots has cost the SPLC hundreds of thousands, and even millions of dollars each year for their fundraising efforts: 2011: -$212,214 2012: -$869,686 2013: -$1,156,765 2014: -$1,130,680 How in the world can Mr. Dees continue to deal with a company that has blatantly siphoned $3,369,345 donor-dollars out of his coffers over the past four years? These horrendous figures more than wipe out every dollar raised by his other telemarketing cronies, not that that amounted to all that much. Checking out Telefund, Inc. of Denver, we see that they raised $561,102 in the name of the SPLC in 2014, and only pocketed $422,292 in fees, leaving the SPLC $138,811, or a whopping 25% of the donation money. Did anyone tell the donors that Telefund was pocketing three quarters of their donor-dollars? But that’s all chump change compared to the experts at Harris Marketing group, who raised $213,694 in the name of the SPLC and “fighting hate,” and only pocketed $192,928, or a mere 90% of the money donated over the phone. And yet, Morris Dees could not be happier with the results because Grassroots, Telefund and Harris all sold their information to him. For mere pennies on the dollar, Mr. Dees buys solid donor leads that he can feed into his own uber-efficient in-house fundraising machine at 100% profit down the road. Best of all, it was the stupid donors who unwittingly paid to have their information sold to Mr. Dees. You really cannot beat that for “stewardship.” Dees will lose money on the deal this year, but it’s nothing compared to the tens of millions he stands to gain from these donors over the coming decades. But think about it. In 2014, Mo Dees paid $2,537,027 to third-party telemarketers to raise $1,979,272 in donor-dollars, meaning that the telemarketers kept every last dime they solicited over the phone in the name of the SPLC as well as an additional $557,755 out of the SPLC’s existing donor till THIS is “sound stewardship?” At $100 dollars apiece “only” 25,370 of the 2014 donors got screwed out of their donations. A mere pittance. At $50 dollars a pop the number jumps to more than 50,000 suckers, and yet, Mo Dees calls this “sound stewardship?” Justify it anyway you want, but at least 25,000 well-meaning donors got screwed out of their money, just as they have for the past four years. It’s time that the media and the IRS investigates the criminal scamming of the Southern Poverty Law Center. This is nothing less than blatant fraud. Selling the suckers one thing and giving them something far less. * * Source: Watching the Watchdogs SHARE VIA EMAIL OR SOCIAL MEDIA: Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on VKShare on RedditPrint this page Related Articles: New Study: SPLC is a Fraud Who’s a White Supremacist? The SPLC — A Deadly Double Standard SPLC: The Quotable Mr. Potok SPLC Insinuates Itself into Department of Homeland Security REPORTS MORRIS DEES, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, SPLC +. But as Kudpung tends to drop you a note when something interesting at WP:WORCS happens, I've got your page on my watchlist too. That's the reason I showed up at AN +" MORE ON LAWSUITS I do think that it is time that a few sentences address the lawsuit IN THE ARTICLE PAGE ITSELF as it is relevant and interesting. I am not taking a position on what should be said. I leave that to others who write better. I'm just adding these references as relevant to this discussion and possible of use to someone trying to put togeher a few sentences. ""Ron Livingston Sues Wikipedia Detractor for Saying He’s Gay"" LexVacPac3 " +" Can you give reference of where I said that I'm Shia on the discussion involving you? And now also your don't refrain putting allegation on me & Shias by your comment, ""let them have issue with Ht Aisha(RA) or Ht Mohammed(PBUH) its there fate, not mine"". i have been trying to persuade you to put up case and have shown you how to do it by pointing you towards article aisha's talk's archives but you seem not to notice my suggestion. I have been most polite to you and have not violated any WP guidelines for User engagement. But you have been putting case against me at various editor's talk pages, and here are those edits: User talk:Usman.shaheen User talk:5faizan User talk:Muhammad Hamza User talk:MatthewVanitas User talk:Cuchullain Apart from this you have raised allegations against me at Talk:Fatimah & Talk:Aisha & User talk:Faizhaider. tc " +Michael Crook Are we having fun yet? *sigh* I read through most of his material on Flight 3407. If you haven't yet... don't. It's beyond vile. It's a defamation lawsuit just waiting to happen. +HA AH AHA HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH +Strange list this is indeed. A name like Jolán is 2 times in here. Can't be right?!? I did find another list, not sure if this one would be better -> http://www.hungarianreference.com/Hungarian-name-day-nevnap-magyar-névnapok-nevnapok.aspx +Birmingham Derby Many people would have chosen to undo my contribution, despite it being entirely factual. So thank you for retaining the bulk of my contribution. Other Wikipedians could learn from your diplomacy. +He was drafted first? Funny; not only does this article give information on events that have not yet happened, it proclaims to be psychic. I'm rewording this thing. +I beat you to it in moving something to the wrong area of WP -) The move template changed a couple of weeks ago and I cocked one up because it confused me. The area you want for articles in the left hand box is (Main). The Wikipedia area is for Wikipedia admin stuff e.g. policies, administrator notices etc. I've moved Collins to mainspace. +by the way, i can see the removal wasn't your doing now. Iam normally a reaonable chap i assure you, perhaps i get a little protective of my edits ;-) tish and bibble, no matter! +There are some pathetic people on Wikipedia to do something like this. Sad. Very sad. +" I encourage you to read that essay carefully. WP is a great resource. It is an amazing resource. It is additionally useful, helpful, unprecedented, and perhaps even world changing! I love it, that's why I volunteer my time here to improve articles and direct people to resources that can help answer their questions. But none of that makes it reliable, not in WP's own terminology. The scientific theory article is a great example. That's actually a pretty good article. And it's useful for many purposes. But the definition is presented too simplistically, and it makes it seem that all theories are generally accepted as true explanations of the world, and that is not the case, as is demonstrated by the phlogiston theory. And that example is confusing, but there are also many many inaccuracies and outright incorrect statements on WP I know because I've fixed a few. Some are accidental, some are malicious, some will be soon fixed, but others linger. Another thing to remember is WP is always a work in progress. A true scholar should evaluate the reliability of every source. That is why I keep directing you to the SEP. That article is written by highly esteemed professional philosophers of science, who we know are educated, trained, credentialed and accepted in that community. Likewise, textbooks are vetted by editors and publishers, and academic journal articles go through peer review to help ensure that correct information is presented. That is part of why they are WP:RS. In contrast, WP is the encyclopedia anyone can edit. I can assert to you that I'm a professional scientist, with over a hundred citations in peer-reviewed journals to my academic articles, and a PhD in math, and maybe that will help convince you that I know what I'm talking about. But I'm not going to bother to prove that to you, and you can't really be sure that I'm not making that stuff up ) While we attempt to distill our reliable sources into good articles, sometimes that gets messed up. If you read the entirety of the SEP article on scientific theory, you will see that it does not support the sentence which cites it in our article! I don't know how that happened. But it will just sit there wrong until someone notices and has the time and energy to fix it. And even then, some well-intentioned editors may resist the change, and revert. And maybe it's not even wrong. Maybe some RS do reserve ""theory"" for widely accepted theories, and would instead say that we should rename the Phlogiston theory to ""the former Phlogiston theory"" or something else! So then we'd have to do a whole re-write, explaining several different notions of what a scientific theory is, and then it might make the article less useful for the casual reader. For 99% of lay use, the issue of reliability may not matter. And surely using WP's sources to cite in papers is a great idea - but you have to make sure that you read and understand them yourself, and don't depend on what WP says they say. If my life depended on it, I would not trust anything on WP, unless somehow I had no other sources available at all, and hence no choice. So no, WP is not reliable. But that doesn't mean it isn't great. Cheers, " +looking for information Hello. Does anyone know the name of the book or the author about a boy who was rescued from the moors in England by a man dressed up as a convicted criminal to go live with his great aunt who is in a wheel chair and only wears a wedding dress and in a locked room of the house sits a wedding cake-the whole room is set up for a wedding party but is covered in cob webs because it happened along time ago. Basically the aunt's wedding never happened. This book is centered around the 1800's in England. (I think) Any info leading me in the right direction would help, trying to find the book for a friend. I believe it was made into a movie/play Please email me at mgiddley2434@charter.net Thank you! +. the albnum's release date was corret (March 1, 2005) +William Fothergill Robinson William Fothergill Robinson (born 1802 Liverpool, died 1870, Liverpool) Broker and proprietor of Liverpool, married Mary Hitchon known as 'The Rose of Burnley' ((See Fitzwilliam Musueum website for painting by George Richmond entitled 'Mrs William Fothergill Robinson)) He was a successful buisness man of this large Liverpool family. He is the grandfather of Herbert Christopher Robinson, who is listed on Wikipedia already. ((Please contact js.fox42@gmail.com if you know about this Robinson family tree or if you are related to this man, to enlarge this web entry/further family history research. Thank you)) +, thank you. You don't have to apologize! +" Vote on Exclusion Support on Exclusion - ""Estadunidense"" is not a current word in Portuguese vocabulary, it's not known by many people, it's not a normal word because it's used to offend, satirize and diminish USA, and Wikipedia function is not to teach or propagandize words, even more a negative one. Who supports this kind of thing on Wikipedia are just political agitators who want to use Wikipedia for their personal purposes. I don't believe the smoothness of those who defend this kind of thing. " +" Actually, since crime scene investigators (CSIs) work all homicides, justifiable or not, I'd support the use of the term ""crime scene."" Apart from that, the testimony of Officer Darren Wilson was that Michael Brown was guilty of initiating an assault on Darren Wilson at that location. At the time that data are recorded from the scene of any homicide, the possibility of a crime having been committed is assumed by first responders and crime scene investigators. Both Darren Wilson and Michael Brown were regarded by press accounts as criminal suspects when that crime was investigated. " +This whole page needs more facts and numbers and less spin. As a wiki user I want to understand this topic. How many GI's are effected. How many dont like it? I have been out since after the firs gulf war. If I get the call today, I will report for duty as ordered. +I came, I saw, I answered. Also I immediately got around to issuing a warning to someone who has been misreading some of the policies. Joy and happiness. Mind if I return to my peaceful slumber? ;-) Apparently this one person deletes warnings from their user talk page. Keep an eye on them. If they cause any more trouble and you want to start an RFC, I'll certify the RFC: relevant diff . +swimmingrecordlegend Hi. I eliminated parenthesis in legend. Regards. +Thank you! Thank you for the warm welcome back. ) Lcarsdata +" Your edit to Loveland frog Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test of deliberately adding incorrect information worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. _dzasta " +" List of groups referred to as cults I've raised a question about one of your edits at Talk:List of groups referred to as cults#Removed not ""groups"" but philosophies. ·:· ·:· " +" Aminz, moving the article specifically will not really clear the misconception. People who don't want to believe the figures are the same will always do that. But in Wikipedia, we can use the actual name for Isa as the Islamic figure that exists in his own importance. It doesn't mean that if a figure also exists in Christianity too that this figure becomes only an article based on the perspective. Isa in his own self can have an article just like Yeahua and Jesu that do exist. It's not simply one perspective of that same person, it's a different belief and the entire reason why the articles is here in the first place. It isn't simply a fact that because a figure exists in two religions that we can not have the real name of the figure being used as the name. It's not something as little as the English language translation, which like I said is not a good argument since we have many articles named on figures in other languages. Just about all the biography articles are that way. a.n.o.n.y.m t " +George Washington had 2 on the vine. Two sets of testicles, so divine. +" Congrats doc, I'll send the dog over to sit the kids if you and Mrs Drmies need some time off. —Spiff " +Super Street Fighter IV: Arcade Edition http://www.capcom-unity.com/snow_infernus/blog/2011/04/12/captivate_2011:_super_street_fighter_iv_arcade_edition http://www.geforce.com/#/News/articles/super-street-fighter-iv-arcade-edition-coming-to-the-pc-this-july i just like the high Nvidia Geforce Graphics Mortal Kombat changed too Super Street Fighter IV Nvidia Geforce GPU +" In the northeastern U.S. we had the cylindrical jars I recall this being as early as the 1970's, and that they were imported from Canada. I only saw yellow plastic lids. Aside from resenting the break with tradition, I thought it was amusing that the label showed a ""proper"" jar of Marmite. If you looked closely, you could see the ceramic pot on the label of the pictured jar. I imagined one day seeing a tube with a cylindrical jar on the label, with a ""proper"" jar on its label, and so on. " +This latter site is obviously a front for Pakistani terrorists. +I have no idea but there are some people around who are pretty good with legal stuff, try some noticeboards. +Now let me get back to eating pussy, which I love more than life itself +No, from what I've seen on Wikipedia, that won't work. I looked at the unblock thing once I got blocked the first time, and I couldn't really find examples of it ever working for anyone else. More likely, using the template would, contrary to the superficial purpose of the unblock mechanism, result in even more harm coming to my account. I would just rather you fixed this yourself anyway. What I said above is true and accurate. If I may break from the rules and speak frankly, I honestly believe you know what I said above is true. Daedalus969 is out of line, and I would have never been blocked it if wasn't for his persistent goading and rule-breaking. I can't force you to warn him or block him, and I can't force you to unblock me. If in your own sense of ethics and justice, you think the right thing is being done, so be it. Maybe I'll be back in a week, or maybe not. If I am wrong, and you do think the right decisions have been made, then there is no reason for me to be unblocked anyway. I say that because I am not sorry. I do not feel I have done anything that merits a one week block. Therefore, it's logical to conclude that I would persist in misdeeds. In fact, if you do feel you are right in blocking me for a week, you might as well block me permanently. I'm editing the only way I know how to edit. Sure, I will get better and more efficient with editing as more time goes by, but whatever perceived deficiencies there are in my attitude, those will not change. Hopefully, you can understand why someone wouldn't want to endure all of this to create one article, which will probably be deleted before my block runs out. +I'm not trying to destroy the fucking article, I'm trying to add something that is actually useful! I'm trying my best to find a fucking source for it so just GET OF MY FUCKING BACK! +The sources disagree with you. He doesn't say he wasn't head of state either, just that he didn't hold the office of Bundespräsident (which I've never said he did). +Buddhism vs Hinduism Hi, on the introduction i can see a comparison between Buddhism and Hinduism which i believe is not necessary for this topic Their philosophies were running along parallel dimensions, except for certain ultimate truths concerning the self, the way to achieve emancipation and the nature of a creative god (which Buddhism denies) and nirvana My knowledge of Hinduism is insufficient to comment on the above line but the information seemed out of place for the article. Thanks ) +Your edit on 'train spotting' I object to your edit of my contribution, good sir. If you look at http://orangecow.org/pythonet/sketches/camel.htm, you will see that that particular Python sketch is different from how it was summed up in the article. Please change it or rephrase it after seeing or reading this sketch. It is not nonsense. This time I am not playing around with you people, I wish to contribute. If you can forgive me, please look into the matter before calling it nonsense. +"this section seems out of place since there is already an article titled Immigration_to_Mexico. The statement ""Mexico has the most strict immigration laws in the world"" is POV. " +No. This is the worst possible solution and makes no sense whatsoever. Let's just do it in WCC, LIKE THE FIA DOES, and leave it at that. How is this even difficult? +" I'm not sure I understand how expanding stub articles is ""compounding the problem""?" +" I take no issue with your assessment. It acually comes about after my assessment of Xenophrenic's history of POV pushing by disruption and edit warring. I see this as an opportunity for Xeno to realize his behavior is unproductive, undesirable, and unacceptable. I suggested to him in the past that his emotions may be driving his desire to ""balance"" articles the way he sees it. Look to his stance on the Tea Parties and the Coffee Party, it's pretty obvious that bad intentions are there. It's actually anything and anybody related to a Tea Party, even a reporter that covered a Chicago Tea Party over a year ago. Xenophrenic is always there to make sure his POV is amplified. Always. Talk " +Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. +" Move? Race Driver: Grid → – Video game renaming:- Race Driver: Grid → ([}} move]) – This is getting ridiculous, it's been 4 years. Race Driver: Grid (Nintendo DS) → ([}} move]) – See above. Suggesting merge into main article, actually. Colin McRae: Dirt → ([}} move]) – See above. Colin McRae: Dirt → ([}} move]) – See above. Dirt 3 → ([}} move]) – See above. Dirt: Showdown → ([}} move]) – See above. The proposer advances no reason for these changes of case to be considered merely technical. I suggest that they be reworked as one or more multiple moves, and presented for discussion. NoeticaTea? Object needs full RM discussion, since it concerns MOS:CAPS. 70.49.124.225 " +English versions There is not need to change from one English varient to another when editing articles, it serves no purpose. Wikipedia policy is to keep the language as it lies, so in the future, please check to see if the spelling you are correcting is actually a mistake, or if it's someone from another country spelling correctly. +" Ranted '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') " +}} {{WikiProject R&B; and Soul Music|and/orclass=C|importance=Mid +" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 2014-08-19T13:56:49‎" +youre an extremist striver, stop trying to pov this article. wikipedias not a place where you get to push your more jews need to be in ovens pov. +I would say it's actually less because Muslim countries don't follow rules or count minorities for their own gain. That is a fact. I would say less than a billion. +" What the...? The semi-protection is gone!! RE-PROTECT!! RE-PROTECT!! '''''' (speak/spoken) " +I'd best correct myself. I've noticed, upon further inspection, a distinct change in writing style in the offending paragraph. It does not invalidate the article that an angry person decided to throw in his two cents. I don't care for the paragraph, for it contributes nothing, but I don't feel comfortable editing the article myself. +Bring it on, see you before Remember the dot or Arbitration because I will not tolerate being supressed or threatened with unlawful sanctions. +I agree about the lead, Billy, though if we can find a mention in the press about that first in US history, its definitely worth a mention in the article. I'll see what I can find tomorrow. +Current events archive I have chosen to undo your addition to the page Portal:Current events/2005 May 12. I think these pages are intended to be an archive of the main news headlines for each day, not a full listing of everything that happened. +" Favor ? Hey! Are you still talking to us? ) You're the only outstanding oppose at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Byzantine navy, so I'm wondering if you mind saying how strongly you feel about the prose now. If not, I understand. (Talk) " +" Concerning point 1, Milburn is a student, by his own statement on his Wikipedia page, studying philosophy in Lancaster. What could possibly be insulting in saying that he is a student, while I myself have been ... (not relevant)? I expect some respect from someone who could be my own child if not student. Concerning your point 2, please read my talk page, and you will see that rather than insulting Milburn, I have just stated facts. Milburn has been writing to me that he is a ""dedicated"" and ""experienced"" editor. Why should this have been relevant to me? I had already told him, in no uncertain terms, that I had left the issue to Stifle to decide upon. Yet, Milbrun kept writing to me that while Stifle was an experienced editor, he was also experienced. All these, in the face of the fact that I had never said him anything to the contrary! I had just said that we, i.e. I and Milburn, disagreed on the issue of the photograph of Michael Foot and therefore it was best if the issue was dealt with by someone else. Why had I to be constantly told things that he kept telling me? Read his messages and count the number of times that he has written to me that I did not understand certain things! What could possibly be wrong with being a student in Lancaster? In point of fact, University of Lancaster has one of the best, if not the best, laboratories of law-temperature physics world-wide. If there are ten great low-temperature physicists in the world, thee of them are in Lancaster (they have over long periods of time had the world records of lowest temperatures ever achieved in laboratory; they were the main figures behind the dilution refrigerator, etc.). No, you are utterly mistaken if you believe that I meant something negative by referring to University of Lancaster - some of my best and most respected colleagues are working there (I even was their guest sometimes ago), one of them also a mathematician of great international standing. I hope I have made it abundantly clear that there is nothing disrespectful in my writings about J. Milburn as a person, as well as about his contributions (I simply do not know his and his contributions). I just happened to disagree with him on his tagging this photograph for deletion. That is why I suggested to him, already yesterday, that rather than arguing, we left the matter to be decided on by Stifle. That is all, insofar as I am concerned. It is J. Milburn who has kept filling my talk page with his messages after messages, telling me that I were wrong and that I did not understand certain things. " +" Pudsey, Calderdale Hi I am not able to delete the page myself as I am not an admin, but I have tagged the page for deletion so that an admin can delete it when they get round to it. | Tell me something? " +a nd whose goals have been opened to question by environmental advocates +" Winterbotham's book has some errors because he was forced to write it completely from memory, Brit govt having denied him access to official docs of the time. His assertion that at no time did MI consider sharing Ultra intel with the Russians has never been contested, not even by MI. His book is notable because it opened the floodgates for other works about Ulta, most notably Bennett's authoritative work with which you're no doubt familiar. Importance of Ultra in Western Allied strategy is either absent from or completely downplayed in wiki milhist articles. When I did submit a reliable Bennett reference (journal article ""Ultra and some command decisions"") with sourced page numbers etc to one milhist article Western Betrayal some time ago, it was promptly thrown out by consensus as ""commie propaganda"". That kind of censorship by a reactionary clique has got to change. An uphill task. " +Auckland meetup We're having a meetup in Central Auckland next Saturday - feel free to come along (see WP:AUCK4). +I think you are misunderstanding what was said. I can't speak for why other editors where adding the link but I believe most editors including myself were not putting it there as a thank you but as an acknowledgment that the site has additional information relating to the individual. With that said I still believe that to not allow the site to be used for specfic information is a major mistake as it will make it difficult to find information on certain Notable biographical articles which will thereby extend a disservice to our readers. +Ed Poor Your user name or IP address has been blocked by Ed Poor. You can email Ed Poor or one of the other administrators to discuss the block. ok, click on email Ed Poor This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users. (swell) +" Music therapy I just saw an edit to the article on Music therapy in which the editor removed three articles that had been added. The edit summary says, ""rm drury COI"". I suppose ""rm"" means ""removed"", and ""drury"" is the last name of the one of the articles' authors (lower-case), but what is ""COI""? Also, why were the articles removed? Just trying to learn something. " +REDIRECT Talk:Brian Nissen (British actor) +RE:Image:Aotp.jpg Get a fuckin' job. +Welcome! Hello, Bellysom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!   WikHead +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Thing " +" Requested move Charles G. Stelle → Charles C. Stelle – The middle initial is incorrect: it is C (for Clarkson), not G. A correct web-accessible mention of this person relating to his time in the US Second Army in China can be found in the register of the Albert C. Wedemeyer papers located in Stanford University's Hoover Institution Archives. The URL is http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3x0n99pv where on page 59 there is a listing of a document by Charles C. Stelle entitled ""Contemporary China"" in folder 44 of the Second United States Army section of the archive. Many other references to this person from a later period of his life may be found in the NY Times archives, for example in the article of June 21, 1963 on the signing of the ""hot-line"" communications link between the White House and the Kremlin: ""Charles C. Stelle of the United States and Semyon K. Tsarapkin of the Soviet Union signed the accord in their capacities as leaders of their countries delegations to the disarmament conference."" There are many other references to Charles C. Stelle to be found in the NY Times archves." +Thanks you for acknowledging what I'm trying to do here. It has been really fun working with you and hopefully there is more to come. I think it's pretty big to reach 100, which I know you'll accomplish this as well. It just goes to show there are many more artists, albums, etc. that deserve something to remember them by. P.S. I will be moving the barnstars to an award/barnstars sub-section soon. I'm just informing you so you know I am not deleting them, but rather displaying them better. +I don't the issue is personal. Sia has his opinion, I have mine and you have yours. What is important is to bring actual sources for your POV. The issue can continue on the relevant talk page, so I'll stop here. +Really? Is there any source for this? +Do you have any suggestions of better people? I don't really mind the thing on Germans and Georgians (which reminds me, would you be able to revert the latter page for me?), but I'm not going to let that Turkish people page fall to those Turkish POV-pushers. +From Kikkid851 I will be delited but I am on holiday so I will get to it as soon as I get home. talk to me at User Talk:Kikkid851. +Block on wikipedia and commons Could I please ask you to lift the block on wikimedia commons for me. This is because I do not know what came over me and would like to upload photo's to redeem myself. Also, have I redeemed myself for the harrassment on other users? (I did not realise that I was harrassing them or should have replied on the RfA page. I was just angry that people had been keeping their comments about me close to their chest as such. I'm sure I would have reacted in a more responsible way if I had been notified about what other users think of me before the RfA. Also, I would like to apologise completely for the harrassment of other users. Thanks and regards +The proposal at the Village Pump is not limited to tagged links. +Speaking as a top award-winning particle physicist, race car driver, neurosurgeon, and rock star, I have a few questions... +Hi babe I just wanted to let you know that I miss you and.......I would really appreciate if you actually let me have earsex with you instead of me having to rape it +Stop vandalising pages! +Another interesting factoid from the Dalit Christians website http://www.dalitchristians.com/Html/arulappa.htm Out of 156 Catholic bishops in India, 150 bishops belong to the upper caste community. Only 6 bishops belong to dalit community. Out of 12,500 Catholic priests, only 600 are from dalit community. 75% members of the Indian Christian community are from dalit community . 25% of the Upper caste Christians (clergy, religious and laity) have complete control over the dalit or untouchable Christians +"==I Live To Code== A proposed deletion template has been added to the article I Live To Code, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of I Live To Code. " +") This tort reform debate is extremely hot in the sense that although there are no reasonable people in favor of tort reform, it is the position pushed forward by the owners of Conngress and the courts. Still, those owners of government do not get to vote in this country (USA), and they must convince the voters to vote for the political candidates that will do their biddingsuch candidates are nearly always a member of one or the other of the two major political parties (about half from one party, half from the other). So the hot debate is not so much a partisan debate along ""party lines"" (note you will not be able to see such lines ona cloudy day, so don't bother to look for them), as it is along the lines of which elected or appointed officials are willing to come out of the closet as kept mistresses, and openly do the bidding of their masters. It's a true nail-biter. The ""debate"" has been keeping ""voters"" on the edge of their seats for years, even though numerous laws have been passed that could count as tort reform, if the counters were honest. For example, the 1995 Securities Litigation Reform Act, and numerous court decisisons (there's one in front of the Supremem Court nowwonder if the little guy will win?) which limits the ability of defrauded mom and pop investors in teh stock market to sue fraudulent companiesmany of which are operating under the guise of a Fortune 500 firm, as Enron did. (This paragraph is about the article on tort reform and how to make it better, and asking for collective discussion. Please do not delete from discussion on tort reform article. ) Tort reform is everywhere like love in the 60s. It is the wave of the future. Someday all of us will wear ankle bracelets and be glad we are not behind bars thanks only to tort reform. (This paragraph is about the article on tort reform and how to make it better, and asking for collective discussion. Please do not delete from discussion on tort reform article. ) So, in conclusion, it is plain that an objective or neutral POV on tort reform will be difficut to achieve. Nonetheless, I applaud those who tried to square the circle and turn lead into gold. However, anyone claiming to be attempting to achieve neutrality on tort reform is by their own admission working for the devil. RUReady2Testify Added again with additional explanation. " +REDIRECT Talk:J. Church (English cricketer) +Your reversion to Ken Broo Let this link show you that you will be eating humble pie. Ken did work for WKRC. Duh! http://www.kenbroo.com/about.html 71.72.172.177 +" Speedy deletion of Gjendemsfjellet A tag has been placed on Gjendemsfjellet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.   (Talk) " +Charles V I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. +Wow man, wow. I apologised. Chill. +Kidding maybe I could show you an email I sent to day to someone where I said it was on the cards - maybe one month? Suro +You have added a 'POV' tag to Jehovah's Witnesses splinter groups. Please go to the article's talk page and start a section to discuss the elements of the article that you believe are not neutral. If you do not do this, the tag will be removed. +" I agree that the prose style in the paragraph is lacking, if only a little. For instance the sentance ""those whose entire culture assumed they were a god, such as with the pharaohs"" could easily be condensed to,""those who were culturally assumed to be gods, such as Egyptian pharoahs"" and to be entirely accurate (pun) I would have to add the pre-Columbian Meso-American kings to that phrase, and any other ""God-kings'. In removing the word ""entire"" we remove any subjectivity. Was every single person in Egypt under the impression the pharoah was a god? Even the poor bastard who had to carry his stool out to dispose of it? More than likely not. As I pointed out above, the title is merely unweildy and very, well, elementary to the impartial observer. " +Proud to be Greek We must mention something about the fact that we Greeks are a proud people, and we are not barbarians like some. The chant of the barbarian will be 'allahu akbar' when he invades europe. +Timer resetted The timer of the Great Minifig Mission has resetted and now ends on July 1st. We need the exact time in GMT and ET, so if you know the time it'll now end, please add it to the article. 86.28.171.246 +Concept (Rapper) Hi may I politely ask why you deleted my article on a well known rapper/friend around the Boston area? Thank You +Last club Can anyone provide a source for him representing NK Limbuš Pekre? Thank you. 84.90.219.128 +REDIRECT Talk:I Want to Work for Diddy (season 1) +Get out my talk page you smelling wog! +At risk of sounding incredibly thick, is the history tab the arrow to left which says older edit? by any chance? yes OK it's all still there well thanks and no worries afterall...I thought it had all been wiped. Now tell me more about the sandbox please. Peter morrell +" That's because it's made with Love! <3...and real chocolate chips! ~Kylu (|t) " +But the name is a Vivendi Comcast mager +" I am not interest in a Good Article ""review"". You misrepresented there to be a WP::GAR which means Good Article REASSESMENT to revert me. You failed to clarify this point repeatedly. I do have to discuss it HERE but not ONLY with YOU. You have a long history of initiating several (losing) disputes notices with me. I have never initiated any dispute notice against you. I have not said the sentence is ""not significant"" and neither have I said it is ""significant"". I am going strictly by MOS:LEAD which is the specific clause for this edit. I am not your servant to find you a substitute. Bring me a replacement and I shall evaluate your choice to see what WE can do. Our standings as editors are unequal, I am the senior editor at Wikipedia over you by quite a few years. " +I like the changes you made, thank you for helping D +|military-work-group=yes |listas=Melzi, Jose de Palafox y, Duke of Saragossa +windows 7 key windows 7 key The account scans your arrangement and displays the artefact key Contacting Microsoft For a New Key,If you don't apperception cat-and-mouse a while for chump service, you may charge to acquaintance Microsoft for a key. About you can alone use this advantage if you still accept the aboriginal Windows 7 accession CD. To do this, alarm the blast amount for Microsoft backup locations at (800) 360-7561. +Yes, you need to, because your fucking ass doesn't know shit about it AT ALL.Rocky +History section Would anyone else prefer the history section to be in narrative form? The timeline is great, but I think it should exist on its own page as a supplement. As it is now, the history section lacks coherence and organization. 02:19, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC) +The Single Greatest Person Ever ROLF ROLF ROLF ROLF ROLF ROLF +==Notice of Wikiquette Assistance discussion== Hello, AndyTheGrump. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. +REDIRECT Talk:Scooby-Doo 3: In The Beginning +Could anyone explain me what happened on the film commentary? At the beginning Vince Vaughn started eating chips. Then Ben Stiller arrived 10 minutes after the commentary started and then started arguing with the director Rawson Marshall Thurber and even burping sometimes. After about 25 minutes Thurber becomes very annoyed with the stupidity of Ben Stiller and leaves the studio. Then both Ben Stiller and Vince Vaughn did anything besides commenting the film, with Vaughn even threatening the crew at the studio. After about 40 minutes from the beginning of the commentary a woman comes in the studio and tells Ben that if he doesn't move his car it will be towed. After this both Stiller and Vaughn leave the studio with almost an hour left in the film! The two men of the studio crew then, in total embarassment, put on the commentary of There's Something about Mary. This proves the complete unprofessionality of Vaughn and Stiller. They behaved awfully, Stiller, after 5 minutes of his arrival wanted to leave and Vaughn insulted one of the studio crew members and, after Thurber went away they began criticizing him. This episode totally changed my perception of Stiller. +" ""Families, couples and individuals are welcome to visit the club."" This kind of shit still lingers in the article: such an edit is exactly what I did not want. I could have done that myself, fer fuck's sake. I would bitch more, but I'm a lazy bastard. However, TALK PAGES EXIST FOR A FUCKING REASON. I'm not angry—just manic. Graah. " +Additional information The following materials are taken from Wyss, James D., and Sandra K. Wyss. An Archaeological Assessment of Portions of the Red River Gorge, Daniel Boone National Forest, Kentucky. Archaeological Report No. 1. Lexington: Ohio Valley Archaeological Research Associates for U.S. Forest Service, 1977. I have copied extensive amounts of text because no copyright notice is present — it's a case of . [page 33] Cowan's investigations at the Roger's Shelters (Po-26 and Po-27) and the Haystack Shelter (Po-47A and B) have provided ethnobotanical analyses of materials obtained under more controlled conditions. Radiocarbon dates from the Roger's Shelters indicate the site was occupied between the fifth and seventh centuries A.D., and Cowan (1976:97-98) postulates a similar timespan [page 34] for the Haystack Shelter occupation. Plant food remains from the site include six species of nuts (black walnut, butternut, hickory, chestnut, acorn and hazelnut), four species of fruits (pawpaw, sumac, plum and grape), and four or five possible cultigens (squash or pumpkin, bottle gourd, marsh elder, sunflower, and canary grass). No corn was recovered. Fragments of cane basketry, prepared bark, and cordage were also collected (Cowan 1976:87-101). [page 36] Cowan conducted limited test excavations at two of the bottomland sites (Po-31 and Po-42) in 1974. One of these sites (the Martin Site, Po-42) produced roughened surface pootery which is similar to ceramics from the Levisa Fork in the extreme Eastern Mountains (Cowan 1976:73-82)...In 1973, members of the Red River Historical Society and volunteers from the university of Kentucky, Department of Anthropology conducted excavations at Mf-32, a single-component Fort Ancient rockshelter site. Materials recovered included corn husks, cordage, cut cane, two species of nuts, and shell tempered pottery, in addition to lithic materials. The depth of the deposit (approximately 10-15 cm) suggested a relatively short-term occupancy (Cowan 1975:101-102). Unfortunately, the materials from Mf-32 have not yet been analyzed and reported. [page 50] This page notes that Cowan's 1975 survey, undertaken in response to changes in plans for the reservoir, gained stratigraphic information on a multicomponent Archaic site (Po-17) in the valley. Cowan returned the following year to complete testing at Po-17 and Po-42, and to initiate excavation at Po-47B, a Woodland rockshelter site. The data recovered from Po-17 confirmed Cowan's 1973 stratigraphic sequence and provided valuable information on the transition between the Late Archaic and Early Woodland cultures in [page 51] the Red River valley (Cowan 1976:ii). Excavations at the Haystack Shelter (Po-47B), a Late Woodland dry shelter site, uncovered a large quantity of well-preserved organic remains. Split cane basketry fragments, plant fiber cordage, leather, quids, paleofeces, and numerous plant food remains including both native and exotic cultigens were among the specimens recovered +JROTC paygrade advancement 2 years are worth 2 pay grade advancements. +New source I wasn't sure where to list this. A dissertation by Samuel Brenner at Brown University in 2009 is largely focused on the JBS: http://www.samuelbrenner.com/Resume%20and%20Professional/Dissertation.htm Abstract: This dissertation seeks to accomplish four goals: first, to trace the development and history of ultra-conservative anti-communist conspiracists – who referred to themselves as “Americanists” – from the emergence of Americanist speakers near the beginning of the 1950s, through the creation of Americanist grassroots organizations such as the John Birch Society near the end of the 1950s and the political heyday of Americanism in the early-to-mid 1960s, until the eventual marginalization and slow decline of Americanism as a political and social force in the mid-to-late 1960s. Second, to focus attention not only on the messages and goals of Americanist leaders, but also on the ideas, views, and concerns of ordinary Americanists, as reflected through letters Americanists wrote to each other, to national magazines and conservative periodicals, to Robert Welch and the John Birch Society, to Dr. Fred Schwarz and the Christian Anti-Communism Crusade (CACC), and even to J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI. Third, to address some of the stereotypical views of the Birch Society and its allies – primarily that Americanists were vicious racists and anti-Semites akin to George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party – and to explore what were in fact ambiguous and nuanced attitudes toward African Americans, Jews, anti-Semitism, racism, Zionism, and the civil rights movement. Fourth, to demonstrate that many of the members of the Birch Society, attendees at the CACC’s “Schools of Anti-Communism,” and listeners to Clarence Manion and Dan Smoot shared a coherent political ideology, which they called “Americanism,” and saw it as their task to inform Americans about the benefits of free market economics, religion, states’ rights, and personal autonomy and the grave dangers of communism, liberalism, collectivism, atheism, and one-worldism. This dissertation is divided into three parts: Part I traces the history of Americanism and Americanists between the early 1950s and the early 1970s. Part II focuses on the critical period between 1958 and 1965, and uses letters and messages to determine what typical Americanists were thinking, saying, and doing during a time of great political and social change. Part III examines the complicated Americanist views of racism, anti-Semitism, African Americans, and Jews. A link to it should be added into one of the sections on sources, whichever section is best. The author isn't really writing as pro-JBS or anti-JBS, so I'm not sure where to list it. +THE MOTHERLODE http://www.rumely.com/History.htm 71.102.2.128 +I have went ahead and made changes to the article if anybody has any problems with it discuss here and we can put out a more accurate article on the group. +As I understand it, her historical campaign style has actually been to deliberately emphasize wedge issues (for example bringing religion, abortion, and gun rights into a Mayoral race). It's not obvious to me whether she even has positions on some of the other things (for instance, I suspect she's playing catch-up on most foriegn policy issues). I agree with you in spirit that we should be comprehensive in our coverage, but we also have to keep in mind that some topics, like pro-life positions, gun rights, and oil exploration, are more developed in part because those are things Palin herself has chosen to emphasize during her career. +Sam is absolutely right. We should really ask Vaikunda Raja. He is the one who has created all these wonderful and interesting articles. +and I'll stop with the over 3 pseudo-reverts but I would like a resolution (particularly on the Castro article) soon. This user's impossible to deal with. 03:36, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) +"I'm going to add my name to those disagreeing with you, Qwl, and I'm going to also point out that your addition of an ""unjustified claims"" template when we have 518 sources in this article is disruptive. Your claim that ""all the documentation is based on the same source"" is unverifiable, because that is your opinion. As a matter of fact, it should all be based off the member record that the Lodge should still have. Regardless of what he did later in life, there are no sources that indicate that he ever renounced his membership. The reason the discussion went nowhere in the past is because, just like now, the arguments against were not supported by sources that were any better than those that supported. You yourself admit he joined at some point in his life, so you've in fact verified our position, so this discussion will not change anything currently in the article. Lastly, five people in eight years is not a consensus to remove. " +This category isn't just for Jews who converted to Christianity...any and all religions are included, including those Jews that 'converted' to non-religion. However, if you want, you could help by adding this category to all of the former articles that you added Category:Jewish converts to Christianity to. In the interest of representing all faiths, Wikipedia MUST have a category for former Jews in the Category:People by former religion category or else they all need to be scrapped. +To: 208.127.154.159, you wrote in the article revision history: 'Arnold Murray does not and has never taught miscegenation. He has said the opposite. Removed false claim.' If you really believe that then you have never listened to his teachings. Even in Genesis 1, he talks about the sixth day creation, and says God created all the races and he wants them to stay that way. In Deuteronomy 23:2, he says it refers to people of two different races and if you violated that law, you can be forgiven in this age of Christ. I noticed that even when something is well sourced and verified/verifiable, like his ministerial license, you delete it anyway, if it is negative. +" Hello, . As you can see, I'm back! Now knock it off with the threats, because if you continue to harass me, I'll report your conduct to the higher-ups at Wikipedia, and you will be the one who'll ""be forced to not edit"". By the way, I won't revert your edits of my revisions of this article, as you are an unreasonable editor who seems to be taking my resubmissions of the http://www.woodbrookeestates.com link personally. I think that I will have much better luck dealing with another editor in the future. Now please leave me alone, ok? I don't want to know that you even exist! " +Note what is says at Help:Merging#Closing/archive a proposed merger: To provide clarity that the merger discussion is over and that a consensus has been reached, it may be important to close and then archive the proposal discussion. To close a merger proposal discussion, indicate the outcome at the top. If the merger is particularly controversial, one may take the optional step of requesting closure by an uninvolved administrator at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. +", 16 July 2010 (UTC) The latest mainstream-science publication that mentions cold fusion [insert link] reiterates the position, which the mainstream reached more than a decade ago, that cold fusion is ""junk science"". And if what I wrote before is modified to not mention ""recent developments"", then the text is still highly accurate and not-misleading. 19:06" +Shut up kid, don't tell me it's 'vandalizing' by editing an article THAT HAS proof if you look close enough and stop circle jerking it up. +For what it's worth, I don't honestly think something like WER should have leader (fearless or otherwise). Editor retention is a complex thing, and there are clearly a number of strong opinions abounding about it (including the feeling that some editors shouldn't be retained). With the wrong leader, WER would very quickly crash and burn. darkness +I have finished that article on Mary of Scotland (1082–1116), sister of Matilda of Scotland and mother of Matilda of Boulogne. +London Boroughs Thanks for reviewing some of the London Boroughs pages, as you've noticed most are in a distressing state - and it's a good day when the page is extended from harmless to mostly harmless. I would however urge you to use the fact tag sparingly - either for things that don't make sense, or that are obviously disputed. I had a quick look round after you 'facted' London Borough of Barking and Dagenham and was quickly able to verify most of them from one source. If you had done the same, rather than leave it to me, we'd probably cut the work in half - but that's not to say you're wrong. They needed to be verified. A bizarre example, which I noted you'd noticed is the London Borough of Tower Hamlets article. Somebody did a drive-by facting and reheading the page structure with stuff from the 'How to write about Geographical settlements' some time ago, they then didn't actually do any work on clearing up the mess they'd left - and, well, it left the page in a worse state than when they'd started. (They also did a lot of damage to other articles in Tower Hamlets, requesting facts all over the place, and marking it as 'lacking references'). You could consider marking pages as this indicates that the page, or section, needs further referencing, and is much less disruptive. Editors are all volunteers, and have a very mixed standard of production. Most of the articles are deficient in any text, let alone referenced material - and setting standards too high does dissuade people from contributing. There's a balance to be achieved, and that should be encouragement, rather than an over enforcement of rules. Where you believe articles are deficient, please do take a moment to try to reference the material, rather than leave it to others. (I actually take a bizarre pleasure in doing that!). Anyway, thanks for all your hard work. I wish all boroughs had reached the standard of London Borough of Croydon. On a number of occasions I've tried to persuade WPLondon to do a blitz on a borough of the month (article by article), ultimately, I think it's what's needed to improve the London coverage. Cheers +A mess of promotion This article is a nightmare of promotion with too many unneeded examples given in places where generalities would suffice. Many of the mentions of a single model of UAV or of a UAV company can be taken out in favor of a less specific discussion of capabilities and use. This article is a magnet for promotion because other UAV designers see their competitor listed, and they want to be listed as well. +I've seen it happen before, some punk did it to dinosaurs. Got banned/blocked for it too, said something like they never existed, so they shouldnt be mentioned. I doubt Jimmy did that. +Alden or talk with Alden +Since you have brought my name into this - I'll comment about my message above - but first, I'd like to point out that you have been soliciting meat puppets publicly on Anthroposophical websites. Here's a link to one of your calls for editors: Getting back to my comment on this page, you showed up here and started slashing away at the Steiner articles, over the protests of established editors. Additionally, you insisted on reverting your changes and even tried to solicit others in your battle to revise history. I won't even go into the content of the edits you were trying to eliminate by force - the issue here is your behavior which, got you banned twice, apparently, in the short time you've been here. I tried pointing out to you several times that the articles that you are trying to forcefully edit are controversial - and that language, a particular phrase, may have been disputed for months before allowed to stay here. You come along and from the minute you show up, slash away at this heavily contested material - WITHOUT discussion of any kind. When you were banned the first time, you came back as a sock-puppet in order to continue discussion. The sock-puppetry and the meat-puppetry are serious enough, your arrogant editing (four editors - from both sides of the issues - objected to your edits), and general rudeness would be enough for me - if I were an administrator, to let the ban continue to its full term. But hey, good luck on your appeal. +his narrow minded version of +First of all, the teaching comes from New Testament scripture, not Old. Today, that type of dress is typical for Oneness Pentecostalism or Holiness, which is already mentioned in the 1960–present sub-section. Also, there are some groups that teach and dress that way that aren't Pentecostal. And, incidentally, all 3 of those denominations above (plus the Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee) and others) came out of the Holiness movement, and originally did dress that way, but changed between the late-60s to the early-80s (depending the particular group). +Fellow, user. Can karma your ovaries.Users. Brooms Illegally track car houses (BTW: Read every first letter of the words)((IM USING A PROXY)) 91.73.192.51 +" A cup of tea for you! . " +Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some tips to help you get started: Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area. If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun! Good luck! (talk)]] P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). +" No the tag should not be removed. (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits No; no information should be lost. (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits " +" Worth considering perhaps- I've got a thing somewhere on the political-weighting of language- might have relevance in that regard? Imperatrix Mundi " +Fine Fine. Carter Page sucks anyway. +Inconsistencies This article seems to pick and choose as to whether or not it is about the books or the films. Please fix this. (not signed in) +The Lone Gunmen I found the references from Fox and left you a response. 72.72.240.141 Talk:The_Lone_Gunmen_(TV_series)#E-com-con_Corporation +British Canada 1764-1866 → – Let's move the article back and work on achieving consensus for further moves. +Source of this file is from the Owner: Grace Sharington. +Typical American. Telling the rest of the world what they should and should not do. So, if you disagree with a FACT, it is vandalsim? Let me guess, you lot founf weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and Saddam Hussien plotted the September 11 payback, right? +" At the top of the article. It has a reference. plug me in " +Justin went to med school, you know, so Justin knows EVERYTHING. Lol. +There is certainly a pattern of deleting appropriate links to technical information, judging by this page. +Glad to have you back! ) onka +" January 2007 (UTC) Francis, Of course I am open to the consensus of the group (any actual trads involved?). However, I think your argument is misplaced. Mainstream Roman Catholicism at this time includes a broad cross-section of people with a wide variety of commitment levels, and yet all are considered ""Catholic"", so I do not think that one can simply compare trads in general with a subset of mainstream Catholics, which we might, for convenience, term ""hardcore."" In any event, my vision for this article in general, and for this section in particular, is to present an accurate picture of the persons discussed, who are traditional, or traditionalist Catholics. Given that, it obvious that some things which are identified with them, such as praying the Rosary frequently or going to Confession often, will also be found among some, more commited, more devout mainstream Catholics. To address your concerns, I am open to acknowledging in the article that this overlap exists. However, I think that removing any reference in this article, in this section, to recitation of the Rosary is selling both somewhat short. There are other things, as well, which could be added, such as a preference for homeschooling (which, again, would not be confined to trads, or even Catholics, but which, I would think, would correlate highly with a traditionalist position. However, the question of the Rosary sort of gets to the heart of the matter. 00:22, 11" +"Help me out here, please. This is not easy. I need someone to restore the ""helpful"" parts of the talk page links to archives and vfd summaries of style and reference And bear with me on ""contributor relations"". There's a reason Jimbo appointed me to the Mediation Committee. I'm r-e-a-l-l-y good at mediation! Ask ambi, ask stevertigo. See the talk page, the restart seems to bearing fruit already. Sheesh! Can't I have a day (one friggin day!) to try to resolve this? Let's see what Patrick has to say. He's the one who asked me to look into this. Be patient. (talk) 11:33, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) " +You restores version 4's image What's the point in displaying it twice on a page? +" Scope of the article David Art's book is mentioned in the article, so I think a good starting point should be what he wrote: ""In this book, I use ""far right"" as an umbrella term for any political party, voluntary association, or extraparliamentary movement that differentiates itself from the mainstream right....""Radical right"" refers to a specific type of far right party that began to emerge in the late 1970s....[T]here has been a convergence around the term in the literature...."" (Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe (2011), p. 10) He then says his definition draws from Betz (1994) and Mudde (2007). My first comment is that since Art says there is convergence on use of the term we should not use in text attribution. We should just acknowledge that while there is no consistency on terminology, the term normally refers to the wave of right-wing parties that began to emerge in the 1970s. We should only use in-text attribution when someone says something original. For example Art refers to Betz when he provides Betz's explanation of why these parties are right-wing. Second, we need to ensure that the article is about a specific topic, in this case the parties and groups that began to emerge in the late 70s, and include only comments about these parties where the author is clearly referring to them. For example, some writers use the term radical right to refer to parties such as the BNP but not UKIP. Other writers may not use the term radial right but may call them ""third wave"" of the Extreme Right Party family, as Mudde did in his 1996 article ""The War of Words Defining the Extreme Right Party Family."" Incidentally we should have an article that family too. It's definition is similar to Art's use of ""far right"", although that term is more usually used for the more right-wing of the Extreme Right Parties, such as the BNP. " +I thought I listed the specific problems on the talk page already? I don't know why you think I'm partisan, as I've posted comments on all 3 wikipedia pages of the NYAG election candidates, asking for revisions to make them neutral, because they all read like PR ads. Coffey's is the most so (based on both the language and the fact that most of it was written by 3 people who did nothing but write the Coffey page and link other pages to it), but all of them have neutrality problems of varying degrees. - +" Film Articles tend to use the date formats of the country in which the film was produced. 4 of the 5 production companies are American and only WinNut is non American. Yet WingNut was only a minor production company, gaining production credit through its use of its Special Effects department. [[User talk:Jojhutton|Hutton]] MOS:TIES calls explicitly for strong ties. A film based on a Belgian comic strip shot in New Zealand cannot make any claim for strong ties to the US. The whole spirit of MOS:TIES is to prevent contentious editors from writing about Winston Churchill in AmEng ""because more people speak American English"". TIES is entirely inapplicable here and should never be brought up in cases like this.  ¡gobble! " +Can you delete my account? I have a really bad reputation and people keep bothering me about it, I have made second accounts, blanked my talk page, and many other things but I can not get rid of it. Can you delete my account so I can create a new one and start over? I would really appreciate it if you did because I want to start over new and have a better reputation. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007. +Possibility of some assistance? Hi GPHemsley, I found your name on the list of active participants at the Linguistics Project. I hope you don't mind me dropping by to ask a question. I am working on the article, accentuation because it was on a list of articles requiring copyediting at GOCE. I have completed some of the copy edit but I don't know whether to try to expand the linguistic term abbreviations (glossing?) I'd be most grateful for any advice, kind regards, Myrtle G +Now, now... be civil. Actually, it does need a citation, since a variety of terms have been proposed instead of OEL. +Gee and BPM Does this even qualify as original research? I mean, if you can count, use division and have some sense of rhythm, you can do it yourself... And it's not like figuring out the BPM of a track is a subjective process either, it is what it is... And in this case the BPM is especially fascinating since it's a fast-paced track despite only having a BPM of a 100 which is really interesting and personally I have no idea how they managed that... ( ) +help! please! someone reply a message to me, why was my edit on a page reverted? +He can't be watched at every moment. +Apologies I wanted to apologize for causing you additional grief. I was trying to make a point and unnecessarily mixed up some things which had the opposite effect. Thanks for your understanding. +REGARDING ALLIANCE WITH M.D.M.K The A.I.A.D.M.K. has finalised seat allocation to a number of new alliance partners,without finalising seat allocation to its long-standing ally M.D.M.K. and the seniormost of new allies,ie.NADALUM MAKKAL KATCHI led by ACTOR KARTHIK.As one hailing from SOUTHERN TAMILNADU,I am of the opinion that the above two parties have considerable pockets of influence in that part of that state.Furthermore,VAIGO has considerable influence all over TAMILNADU,more so in COIMBATORE,ERODE,TIRUPPUR&THENI; DISTRICTS.In addition to the above parties,PURATCHI BHARATHAM PARTY,which was an ally of D.M.K.,for the last five years,has come out of above alliance.The above party has considerable pockets of influence in TIRUVALLORE,KANCHIPURAM&VELLORE; DISTRICTS.I,THEREFORE,SUGGEST THAT THE ABOVE THREE PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO GO ALONE OR JOIN ANY OTHER ALLIANCE OR FORM A NEW ALLIANCE.THEY MAY BE PROVIDED SEATS IN THE ALLIANCE LED BY A.I.A.D.M.K. AS FOLLOWS:- M.D.M.K. -15 to 18 seats. NADALUM MAKKAL KATCHI-3 seats PURATCHI BHARATHAM -3 seats. The above parties will be of immense help in capturing power by the A.I.A.D.M.K. +shut up man! SHUT UP I DID NOT DO ANYTHING Click Here for what I Wrote To You A Few Months Ago. +Also Tom Hanks and JabbaWockeeZ had unhelpful changes. +I cited the sources at the bottom of the page.... i mean for FUCK sake. Haven't you read the FUCKING discussion page dickwad? +Why? It is so much fun pointing at the loonies. This wiki stuff is just crapola of the daftest kind, and I no longer care about being blocked anyway. +"Please stop altering the external links in the manner have done, thanks melmac " +Miami instead of LA was an accidental error. So there is no need for you to keep using it as a deceitful excuse. You obviously know nothing about the MLS or LA Galaxy. The season runs from April to November. Pre season training and pre season games start in January. He was resident in LA in his home, which he still owns and uses as a home, with his family for 11 months of the year from January to November, for 5 years. So stop trying to deceitfully distort the facts ! +"No, you are censoring Jewish human rights groups and whitewashing an article about Judeophobic ethnic cleansing committed by Arabs while at the same time adding Arab propaganda denying the real Nakba, the Jewish Nakba, in order to promote your Arab nationalist agenda. Wikipedia already has enough problems with its Israelophobic bias, so people like you and Zero0000 should stay off this article. I recognize that you two regularly write Arab nationalist propaganda for Wikipedia. And how is this an ""Arab conspiracy""? The Arabs make no attempt to conceal their desire to ""kick the Jews into the sea"" and destroy Israel. Denying this fact is equivalent to Holocaust denial. " +" There is nothing personal about this situation. I do not know you and will never meet you. Regardless of how ""angry"" you become, your opinion does not affect me personally. What you are doing is abusing the rules of this site. A frivolous argument was created over ""who's source is better"" and you ""magically"" came along to reinforce Mirrored Love's opinion. As I pointed out above, your argument has the exact same tone and composition as Mirrored Love. Your edits are practically identical to Mirrored Love. Six other editors agree. Despite this grandiose production you've put on, you have yet to break the correlation between yourself and Mirrored Love. Yelling at myself and other editors is not helping your situation. " +" I'm not sure if Talk " +HolyRomanEmperor, like Estavitsi, God of Justice, Panonian and many other Serb nationalist editors, simply does not swallow the fact that Djukanovic was successful in separtaing Montenegro from Serbia, letting Serbia alone during Kososvo War and after that going independent, separating the Serbs from the sea. +Yes, you made a mistake. Yes, you made a mistake. The road had been constructed, extended and is open for traffic. It is important to now have the correct information on here. Stop changing it. +That's not how NPOV works Gorlitz. NPOV means that we do, by definition, bias ourselves toward the scholarly consensus. +Emergency rations When after Hurricane Mitch emergency supplies including Marmite were sent to Honduras the locals thought it was mosquito killer, +" Sockpuppetry case Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaimatadi000 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. " +Of the sources in the article, this is the only one that seems to give a specific estimate (of 6 million barrels per day). So, I have changed the figure in the introduction. Thanks, '''''' (Talk) +Naivity proven yet again ) +Quantum of Solace Perhaps its too early to make a judgement but the early pre-reviews of the film are quite awful. When I found out that Jack White was doing the theme tune alarm bells began ringing. The Bolvivian location and plot in, especially in relation to the title seems too far fetched even by Bond standards although the plot in a way seems quite SPECTRE esque, looks like it is full of action scenes though. The baddy doesn't exactly look the most menacing either does he? Bring back myself I say!. Also I prefer my films well over 2 hours, this film is the shortest of the films so far. Mmm, I guess I'll have to wait a week to find out. What do you think? +" HUH? You can't find ""anything which suggests that members spoke out against their organisation or report""? Almost all the board members have publicly stated they were consistantly denied access to evidence, lied to and obstructed. If this is not critism what is it? " +" We agree that there are human rights that do not appear in any law book, treaty, dictionary, or even a USSC decision. The founders of the US said this, and wrote an expandible constitution. The 14th Amendment reserved to Congress the authority to enumerate these. This happened when Congress enumerated such rights with the Civil Rights Act of 1963 (from the Republican Party) and more recently with the Americans with Disabilities Act. I expect that you will see some more ""enumerations"" by Congress. The US Constitution is designed with the idea that as society progresses that human rights will continue to be ""enumerated"". I can remember when there was no right of privacy, but Roe v. Wade enumerated this right. The problem we have here and now is that rights that you and I now believe should be enumerated have not yet been. This means they cannot go into an encyclopedia until they too are enumerated. " +Many thanks for your help. I'll work on that article in the near future (studies etc. holding me up for now), and then resubmit it for assessment. Thanks again. +They aren't, they're poor. +Well I wasn't the one that first started putting down the forms. What i'm really worried about are the attacks. Maybe we should make a separate article for their forms, maybe one for their attacks too, if the Wiki brains ruin that too..... +You were more than willing to go to the mat to defend the idea that Marinol causes fatalities based on half a dozen case reports , but faced with greater evidence (a larger number of case reports and some actual controlled studies) supporting a link of cannabis to CV events, suddenly its all a conspiracy. I think you should cool it. +" Help? Hello Roger, I'm the new Wikipedia registrant who added the Mahiole link on which you commented. Another Wikipedia editor (""Simple Bob"") deleted this and other contributions I added, claiming them as spam. I'm confused as to why, since all of my links were content-relevant to the pages in which they appeared. Can you look into this? I understand the need for vigilance against spam on Wikipedia, but feel ""Simple Bob"" was in error to treat me as a spammer. I'm not selling or promoting anything, simply linking to information on pages which are lacking in adequate citation. Thanks, r " +" To try to state the problem more clearly. There is a matter of taste. Certain ones have to be in English (Warsaw), Certain ones have to be in Polish (Mariensztat) due to lack of good translation. There's a grey area in the middle. We have to decide where the dividing line is. Since it seems that everybody agrees that Polish is better here in most cases, we can easily and simply list the ones which we think should be in English. ""Old Town"", ""Home Army"" and ""Warsaw"" as before + ""City Centre"". So we can't vote simply since yes or no. We have to list." +My abuelo told me he was distant, but related. +what do Giant Gippsland Earthworms eat? +Hi Alpachimp, Have you any friends? Best Wishes, Hernan Crespo +Inappropriate edit to Compton, California +" Oh I completely agree. I have kept to editing these concepts to a minimum for this. Ontology is ""to be"" or ""on to"" and this is in Greek by categorization. Ontology (and metaphysics by proxy) are nothing more then to categorize something. If you get a chance to look at the Bradshaw link to his book, notice that he uses the Greek words in Greek with Greek fonts. This is because the meaning to the words have been so drastically changed that for people to say them now in some cases means that the original lessons and knowledge (epistemology) has been lost. Hopefully the categorization example I gave shows some flexibility but it is also safe to say by the book that no one translates entelechy as intelligibility. For this User:Andrew Lancaster is correct. " +No, you've been using a lousy definition of socialism which is not on the Wiki, but which you think should be. +" Admin ""I saw you were made admin and I almost shit. You must be a very happy man. Congrats."" " +" Well... And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ""you are always wrong"" are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. How nice. You delete my post and don't answer. (see the history) Very creative...I suggest that you drop this aditude ""don't post crap on my page."" I sent report of this action to moderators." +" Let me help you with ur little sock puppet investigation I am user:yourname and user:troller101 lol ur not going to stop me, there you got im telling u who i am so stop wasting ur time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.58.164.114 Ill evern log in using this ip so you can checkuser 199.58.164.114 " +No. There is no need for a spin-off for a relatively minor character, esp. not since the current article is already excessive long and detailed, and has only a dozen and a half or so reliable secondary sources. +I'm not disagreeing with you that the group exists, thats obvious. We need an authoritative source to list them as terrorists, though, not any .com operation. +" Let's Clarify Something here First of all, nice to meet you Stephanie Adams. I to am a very well known celebrity, I just in fact was almost a winner for a daytime Emmy award (but that's neither here nor there) I think what the big confusion is about Wikipedia is that it is verifiable information, not what you WANT on your wikipedia article. Meaning, awhile back your website sold tarot card readings via email, we can all see that looking at the cached version of it. Maybe you do not do that anymore but your company DID in fact do it. Therefore since Wikipedia is a historicaly piece of work, it should be listed. Maybe instead you could add in ""Used to.... but does not anymore"" I used to dance with Hula Hoops on stage. I do not anymore. But if a person put on my Wikipedia Article, ""Julianna Mauriello used to dance with hula hoops on stage"" then I could not mark that as non factual and write on wikipedia that it is not true. So for that reason, since I can see that your website USED to sell Tarot readings via email, I am going to revert it but also comment it to show that you no longer DO tarot card readings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julianna_Rose_Mauriello " +":I have no problem accepting your request, Scott. The ""dogs of war"" - or, to do away with the metaphor, my own emotions - only reached what could be considered a ""peak"" when I found myself blocked for what seemed (and still seems) to be no other reason than not crying ""uncle"". Until I am told otherwise, I will also refrain from commenting on the recent AN/I (see below), other than to confirm I was made aware of it. " +Undid revision 454530404 by Seric2 You need to explain why you did so. This is vandalism. You are deteriorating the quality and information provided by the article. You wish to present a city that is underdeveloped, has no historical squares and monuments and introduce low quality pictures. This will not remain so. It is clear what your views are and where you are hailing from. Unfortunately we cannot twist reality in otder to satisfy your views about Nicosia. Nicosia is what it is and an encyclopedia must represent it the way it is not the way a fanatlic nationalist dreams it should be. +" I think the location is fine. The material is all worthy of mention but being at the bottom it doesn't dominate the article and make it unduly negative. I'm feeling that ""Criticism"" ought to be in its name somewhere as I don't suppose either Channel 4 or Saffia (her family and friends notwithstanding) received much support for their decisions. " +I.P. THIS IS AN AOL IP +Get a proper job kilt lifter +"==A few concerns== I noticed at Kars, Turkey that you aren't working within Wikipedia's rules. We have rules which require good manners and which prohibit edit-warring, and you should probably review those rules before you continue editing. At Wikipedia, people from many cultures work together to try to create a fully neutral and verifiable encyclopedia, so when we disagree, we stop and politely discuss our disagreement on the talk page until we reach consensus. I hope you'll try it; I think you'll find it works much better than what you're doing so far. - (talk · contribs) " +" podcruft? In you recent edit to WITF you had a summary of ""rv. self to remove podcruft"". Mind explaining what ""podcruft"" is and why you felt in neccessary to revert? Your version includes information such as frequency and station number which isn't really required on a dab page. Thanks/ " +" I would simply like to point out the aggressive tone in your reply to this message I posted on my own talk page. It shows that you are stalking me on this website being as it on my own talk page - My intent was to document this problem - I didn't even post it on an open discussion page out of courtesy. The mere tone of your reply displays that you have a personal problem with me. Apparently, you think I have some connection to Sante Kimes. I have repeatedly denied this unproved accusation. I am only a researcher of many well-known court cases and my only concern was the tone and POV displayed on the Sante Kimes article. I haven't even had much of a chance to read over the other articles listed on Wikipedia that I have researched, because of the issues with this Sante Kimes page. The article began going in a neutral point of view, then you began to change the tone of the article. I don't understand it, other than you have a biased opinion. I posted discussions on the discussions page regarding changes that I thought were needed. You could have simply changed the article to say ""Sante Kimes is a convicted murder"" if the small change I made was that horrible to you. I think the change to the lead you made is just out of spite because I said ""being a con artist is not a crime"". I actually meant it in a joking way, not to criticize you, but you apparently took it as an attack because of what you listed in the edit note in your reply and at around the same time you changed the lead info. Had you posted on the discussion page about his first, I would have talked with you about it. The change I made to the lead was from a neutral POV. I don't know how it was not. As for saying ""American woman"" that is listed for several female criminals in their lead information on Wikipedia. An example is Susan Smith, one I happened to notice before changing the lead on the Sante Kimes article to ""American woman"". There you have it - where I got ""American woman"" from. I just don't understand where this hostility is coming from. " +" "" If you're really here to help improve Wikipedia, please act like it. If by 'improving Wikipedia' you mean tolerating lying ... don't count on it. But what do you think ? | Talk " +At first I thought your reasonning was correct. You may be right about what I am saying about Van Halen, maybe I shoudn't insert it at all. But don't ever go and make fun of me. What's your fuckin' problem asshole?! Why did you put that stuff about me and the 450 pounds, what's your fuckin' problem. My size has nothing to do with the Van Halen article. I may be a little heavy, I'm a powerlifter and I guarantee you that I'm a lot stronger and a lot bigger than you and I could kick your ass anytime. Don't ever make fun of me in that way again you fuckin' fagget. You need to know a little more about manners you fuckin't pig. All I did was try to imporve the article but because of your bullshit I can't write in the article. Now your in real trouble asshole, just wait...just wait. [unsigned 22:10, 8 September 2005 by User:Masterofthesky] y'know, i could sit here and hurl some pretty funny stuff back at you, because i'm good like that, but you're right; i shouldn't have been mean to you. i was pissed because you don't sign your comments, and because i had to spend so much time instructing you on the same stuff other people have obviously tried to instruct you on before. it's annoying. so maybe you'll let bygones be bygones, now that you've made me move your stuff and put a sig in for you again. i'll even remove that snide comment i left, if you can tell me what 2 + 2 equals. deal? c'mon. try very hard, and i'm sure you'll get it. what is 2 plus 2, you fucking birdbrained ape from hell? +" Wait a moment here, delete the page? So those of ""us"", meaning YOU feeling protective and butthurt about the page not being the way you want it to be despite having one reference and rest conjecture, would rather demand it being deleted than being encyclopedic? Does ""you"" speak for the rest of the ""who cares about custom cars""? Or will the page be deleted all because you said so? And you're still denying wp:ownership? Defense?in vain? Wow, you're on fire with those misnomers. Victory to the philistines? Rofl, whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep. " +Beckjord to DreamGuy I want you to please cease editing the Bigfoot page. You do not seem to be up on info, have read nothing by Pyle, and are out of the loop. Please stop. becjord +UT) u racist nigga u blocked me cause im black +" (deindent) Not even wrong only if you don't understand what he's doing. These are all standard problems for the many millions of people who have tried to make sense of infinite arithmetic at some point in their lives. The number ...9997 in Archimedes' system is also known as the number -3, which almost is the ""largest prime"" in Ludwig's order on the Plutonian integers. You would think ...99998 might be the right one, but that's -2, and it is clearly divisible by two. So maybe ...9997 should be thought of as divisible by three, but dividing by three is different than dividing by two in base-10, because two divides 10 and three does not. So maybe that's a self-consistent definition in a 10-based infinite arithmetic with the order he chooses. Maybe not. I don't know, but neither do you, and to pretend otherwise is insincere. It's not incoherent, just original, and incomplete. The methodology is obviously many, many, painstaking infinite digit calculations, with the extra burden that the rules keep shifting whenever he finds an inconsistency. The reason he claims transcendental numbers are incomplete is because, if you accept that the integers are Plutonian, the real numbers are only ""finitely"" wide. Normally, a real number can be thought of as a map from Z->digits, giving it's digit sequence. Unfortunately, Plutonium's ""Z"" is just as large as the real numbers, so that a real number is really only a sequence of digits, because a sequence in this view cannot be viewed as a map from Z-> digits. In this view Z is larger than any sequence (the integers are ""uncountable""). So the real numbers have ""gaps"" which would be filled by reciprocals of infinite integers. But large integers don't have reciprocals in Plutonium's system, because he can't make any sense out of bi-infinite sequences: Numbers like ... 999123.3333..... are not allowed because you can't do multiplication digit by digit. So he doesn't think of the real numbers as containing the integers, he has two classes of numbers the ""Adic integers"" which are infinite to the left and finite to the right, and the ""real numbers"" which are infinite to the right and finite to the left, and it is illegal to add an adic integer and a real number. The reason Archimedes Plutonium keeps working on the Riemann Hypothesis is because he feels he can say something new about the distribution of primes because he has knowledge of some infinite ones. This is because he can ask questions like ""if I choose an infinite integer at random, digit by digit, do I get a prime number?"" Those sorts of questions have analytic counterparts about real numbers (complete numbers really). He probably feels the twin-prime conjecture is false, becuase, what's the chance that the infinite integer ....321113 and ....321115 are both prime? He also probably feels that an infinite even number can never be the sum of two primes. These last two statements are both based on my own thinking. He might thinks that there are very many primes at infinity, I don't know for sure. Look, I am not saying his mathematical musing are not cranckish. But recognize that Archimedes Plutonium is to cranck science as Isaac Newton is to mainstream science. He has seen futher than others even though he stands on the shoulders of no-one. " +" ""Haredi"" is a very slippery term. 100 years ago it was synonymous with ""orthodox"". Since the 1970s or so it has evolved a new meaning, which is widely understood but is hard to define with any precision. I'd hesitate to use the term of anyone before 1950, and certainly before 1900. " +" The secret of life ""The secret of life is to have a task, something you devote your entire life to, something you bring everything to, every minute of the day for your whole life. And the most important thing is - it must be something you cannot possibly do"".-Henry Moore, 1898-1986" +" Swapping images, so leaving the Helton image here. talkcontribs " +Your edit to Portal:Sexuality You have been around Wikipedia long enough to know that blanking pages is not acceptable. In fact, it is a form of vandalism. Please don't do it again. (talk) It actually was not me putting it back (before this time). Look at the edit history and you will see that it was Jasonglchu. He's right, though. You shouldn't remove it. It makes you look dishonest. If you don't want to have messages about vandalism, then don't vandalize! (talk) +" Vandalizing At first I wasn't even aware that the order of the first three bouts on the mobile version of the website was different from the official version. I found out through him sending me an image of the official website. Since it was only an image, I checked the website just in case and was shocked to find out that that was indeed the order that they had on there. I did not and still do not have any proof that the mobile version of the website is ""outdated"" as he stated. When I made the edits (prior to my knowledge of mobile being different from the official website) I chose to not change or add a reference because When I clicked on the already present website reference, it automatically took me to the mobile version, being that I was using my mobile device to make the edits. Due to prior research of the fighters involved in the first three bouts and common knowledge of the sport, all common sense and logic led to me believing (like I always did) that the order of the bouts on the mobile version was the correct one. As soon as I found out the mobile version and official version were different I re-edited the page to rearrange the bouts to the most logical order and changed the prior reference from the official site to the mobile. I was never aware that you guys didn't accept mobile versions of websites with more logical information as references until I read his complaint and your response. I apologize if I caused any inconvenience or misunderstanding on your website. My main intentions were to help improve and accurate the content on the page based on my knowledge and common sense. Also keep in mind that I'm a new user on this website and still have things to learn about it. It was all a learning experience for me from beginning to end. ( )." +" I just submitted some changes trying to tone it done, but still be factual and maintain the ""controversy."" Let me know what you think. Thanks! " +" Exist 2 Inspire The Hardys are one of the universis greatest tag teams. They are no longer working together seeing as Jeff Hardy got sacked. He may be making a surprise return to the WWE in Summer or early Fall of 2006. This being because his contract is expiring on TNA (total nonstop action), so the WWE are thinking of bringing back one of the most popular ever wrestlers in the WWE. He may once again form a stable with his brother Matt and bring back the great team extreme. all the hardy boyz fans out there youll be seing them back in action before the end of the year. lita (DDT) jeff (swanton bomb) matt (swist of fate, side effect) edge and christian are bitches as are the dudly boys facts jeff hardy most gamest person on tna at the moment facts matt hardy most electrifing person on smackdown facts lita most cheating woman on raw at the moment with her fucked up boyfriend edge but after its gonna be lita with jeff and trish status and matt so r u ready for the reunited team extream matt,jeff and lita ^^Total garbage, none of it is fact, not even decent speculation^^ Lita would not be in Team X-Treme. That would be asking for a problem. Well as of now maybe Jeff will enter a feud with Edge and maybe get kicked off of Raw the way Matt did? Or maybe Edge will get kicked off and continue his feud with Hardy on Smackdown! Exist 2 Inspire Edge and Lita will possibly be leaving to TNA in the future. And the Hardy Boyz Reunion has been talked about happening at Wrestlemania 23. No Rumors. (talk to me) (watch me) The Hardy reunion has been finalised, they're competing together at Survivor Series, part of the team captained by Dx, along with ECW's Punk. Perhaps that should be entered into the article. Richard stage name Even, and especially, if you claim that Hardy is their real last name and not a stage name, then there is an unbelievable coincidence then that they chose to be called the Hardy Boyz and not the Hardy Brothers,, the Hardies or whatever. This does not distract from their image, don't take it personally. Please explain why Hardy Boyz has no relation to anything else and was a pure creative idea. I'm sorry if I sound rude, but do you even watch wrestling? Do you have any clue what you are talking about? Hardy is their legal last name. Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy. So they are called the Hardy Boyz. Jeez, you would think if you wanted to edit a wrestling article, you would at least know what you are talking about. Again, sorry if you take this offensively, but its the truth.  (talk)  While you continue to ignore my argument, the argument you use is childish and preposterous and you really don't care if I watch wresting, which leagues or since when either. Whether Hardy is their real last name or not is not the issue. The facts are that a) whether you like it or not, Hardy Boyz is a stage name, not unlike the Hart Foundation, and the Beverly Brothers, b) the Hardy Boys existed way before the Hardy Boyz adopted this variation. Soon your going to tell me that the name 'Hulk' in Hulk Hogan, has nothing to do with the previous usage regarding the green giant? Nobody has claimed a copyright violation, and I have absolutely no clue, and frankly wikipedia does not care, why you think that you have master editing rights on this article. First, The Hart Foundation were called that because the real names of the characters are Bret HART and Jim NeidHART. ""Hardy"" is their legal last name. Please do some research first, since they are sometimes called the Hardy's. Maybe they chose Hardy Boyz instead of Hardy Brothers because of the books, you would have to ask Matt or Jeff that. Their real legal names are Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy though. If you would only listen to yourselves, you'd hear that their real name isn't 'Hardy Boyz' at all, and that they've chosen this stage name over ""Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy"". TJ, you ""maybe they chose..."" is the whole point, you and Mike have no other clue. Whatever. Why you both think it detracts from their image is beyond me. 20 +People of exceptional talents and abilities, such as Col Edson, are often their own harshest critics. He may have felt that he did not live up to his own standards. For a possible reason why, by no means to be regarded as as proven fact, consult references to him in William Manchester's memoir of the Pacific War, Goodbye Darkness. +" No, they DON'T!    " +Who needs a tune up? A modern car's ignition system is built to last 150,000 miles with out adjustment. Now this isn't a forum, so if you can't explain what makes this directly related to the article, it'll have to be deleted. +u cant block me i no where u live.if u block me i will come round ur house and rape u up the ass +Deryck, voting support for yourself on RfA is against the standard on the page, and people have voted oppose before just because the candidate voted for himself (which is, I repeat, against the norm). I would highly recommend that you remove your own vote. Thnaks! | A note? | | WS +Amish 01 Hi Farsight. Do you have any suggestions for how to deal with Amish 01? He is continuing his disruptive behaviour. +Your essay I've moved your essay (which isn't really in a state that it's likely to be useful to other editors) from Wikipedia namespace to User:Krauss/Semantic-core boxes. I've also proposed to delete the redirects associated with the essay - here. (talk) +" I've been bold and tidied it up a little. Moved the most relevent section ""relationship with Professional Theatre"" to the top where it belongs (could someone add the article references we think are useful?), along with the fun parody section. I've also brought the obvious opening statement to the beginning, defining amateur theatre accurately. It already reads as much, much better and more truthful. As a fair comprimise, we can then list as many companies as we like. Now that the opening sections place these companies in the correct context, I don't think it reads as ridiculously and unfairly as it did and there's no reason why amateur companies can't be mentioned. A ""criticism"" section at the very end would still be welcome, though.(129.96.115.48 )" +Well, it was a nice try but some users are just not going to let any negative information in. The claim was the ministerial license was a fabrication. I got the license, uploaded it, sourced it, and they removed it anyway. Also, some of the paragraphs are disjointed sentences now, so, it would be difficult to restore the article piecemeal. The version earlier today was a good version and if people want to rewrite, etc. that is fine, but this other user is slicing and dicing anything negative. Thanks anyway though +I am aware you have rudely decided not to create a wikipedia account, thus making it needlessly difficult for people to communicate with you and track your actions in general. I do not see why this is a reason for me to make it even harder by not linking your posts to your current IP. Algebraist +User Page Why do you keep changing my page, I like it the way is it. +" ""Failed""? Those images fully comply with all of the 10 criteria in WP:NFCC, which you seem not to understand too well; your hypocritical arguments about ""the critical commentary necessary"" are moot, as is your foul reasoning attempting to link the location or scene in the pictures with the respective articles. By now several editors must probably be wondering about your pathological mental processes through which you obviously derive pleasure from the vile act of deleting (ie., destroying) other people's graphic contributions. You are but a nuisance, worse, a vandal, a destroyer! Why don't you get a job in Real life as a pest exterminator, for instance? Your zest for destroying & annihilating would find some meaning, some useful cause, instead of damaging this encyclopedia's contents. What clearly no longer needs to be on Wikipedia is you, ""the tireless destroyer""!! " +...and accusing someone of repressed homsexuality is? your values are backwards, You defend your own and attack those who challenge your lies, the WP rules of conduct are not god. The agenda you are promoting has been revealed for what it is...a lie. The world is not yours, there is a higher truth. Between peace and righteousness, I choose righteousness. Repent fag. +" rating Christian articles - just curious John you recently increased the rating on the LDS Church article to ""mid."" As I was looking at the respective rating categories, I really could not get a feel for why certain articles receive a rating. Jehovah's Witnesses and Adventism for example have a ""top"" rating, but many other churches are found in all other categories. Can your help me understand what logic is used to differentiate between the application of ratings? Just curious, thanks. StormRider " +, i am not entitled to give you all the explanations personally for whatever i do on wikipedia. Whatever i have edited i wrote the explanation in the space provided for the same. U seem to be keenly interested in all my activities on the wikipedia. Talking in wikipedia's language,only if you have citation for any one of the entries i have deleted, then talk to me regarding this matter. Moreover , i am not afraid of getting banned. Go ahead if you want to, but you have to give reason for that. -User:Sherepunjab/User:Sharmalabs +And what is wrong in what khatri has said, and i dont understand how his and mine statements contradicts. +It is great to see someone actually checking the references. The description in the article is my personal editorial freehand description of the equation on page 384. No reference. Indeed I did not try to use Clausius' terminology. My aim was to present his idea in present day language. If you feel like improving on it, I will not be offended. I referred to the 1850 paper to in order to defer to Clausius' priority in stating the law. I would still prefer to quote the 1850 paper rather than the 1865 one. I have not tried to present the nearly simultaneous 1850 version by Rankine, but I would not object to seeing that done as well, though I think it perhaps unnecessary. +On adding this page I did not make many distinctions, ie. leaves, fruit, roots, etc. I also noted that the entry for Opuntia was not well maintainted, and not any real clean or activity in about 10 years. As such, I plan to make occasional additions and corrections, but feel free to change, add, or organize. You can also check my status on my — +" Tawker: With the first sentence, your second edit to that is fine, although I saw no reason to tinker with the sentence in the first place. my mistake I just got mixed up between that and your first edit which wasn't so neutral sounding. With the second paragraph, it's relevancy is in question, it is not notable, and it is an non-constructive edit. Howcome you didn't bring this up in the discussion page like you are supposed to. You are on wikipedia long enough you should know this. Also, you added another unqualified edit to the 2008 referendums section. We talked about this didn't we? You and I, I don't understand why you'd go ahead and insert ""independent elections administrator."" We were talking about this for days but then you try to sneak it in the backdoor. Be upfront and reasonable, let's talk this shit out or the page is going to continue to be crappy, marred by bad grammar, spelling mistakes, and non-neutral language. " +" Merry Christmas and Happy New Year I wish you merry Christmas and a Happy New YearAaron Janagewen" +Note also that the pagemoves had consensus, or at least lack of significant opposition, at an RFC months ago Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (events). The guideline was for rail accidents that had no more specific name. Does anyone really care? I just wanted to create a standard style. +I personally would prefer to not have most diacritics with a few possible exceptions such as ñ in Spanish, as it changes the sound, which many English speakers acknowledge. Those such as á, simply indicate stress in most cases, which most English speakers would not remember. If there is an insistence in using diacritics in titles, the we should also have a rule with a redirect from a version without them. +"::Yes, lets pretend it was just ""general chatter"", like talking about the weather and the latest pokemon. " +Number of listeners? Can someone who knows the # of listeners to Democracy Now add this information to the article? Thanks. +" Speedy deletion of Jason Pack Favorite Educational Links A tag has been placed on Jason Pack Favorite Educational Links requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, ""See also"" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. (talk) " +" Son of a Gun Hello, a while back you moved the article ""Son of a Gun (I Betcha Think This Song Is About You)"" to ""Son of a Gun (I Betcha Think This Song Is about You)"" but as you know About should be capitalized (see:Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization)) and since I'm not an admin I can't do the move myself, so I'm asking you to. Thanks " +"(Copied from the administrative noticeboard) For those of you whom Raul654 is trying to confuse, I'll make the ACTUAL long story short. I came to Wikipedia, wrote perfectly original articles on Negro Leaguers, was shocked by what was in retrospect libertarian/libertine POV (though I knew nothing of Wiki policy at the time), was told by Raul654 that he ""depised political correctness"" and he accused me of ""PC (political correctness) pushing"", called me a ""troll"" and even claimed that my Negro League articles were ""far from original"". I didn't know the ""no legal threats"" policy, but most of my ""legal threats"" were against Moriori anyway. I guess that libertarians think that laws against slander, like the laws of motion, should be removed from the books. Felix Frederick Bruyns " +It's those biography and political articles you should watch out for. +" Al-Islam.org is a site which gathers many sources. Some of them are reliable and are not. In every case we should check the auther. For example A Study in the Philosophy of Islamic Rites is written by Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr who is authentic in that field. Fatima is Fatima is written by Ali Shariati who is not authentic in the field. Furthermore you can use Google book, Amazon, etc to find the more informatio about publisher, author, etc. So we can't judge about the site which is collecting sources from different authors in general.(t-c) " +Hello Sergecross73 I wasn't lecturing (I hate lecturing on Wikipedia). I was just noting what I've observed based on past behavior by user Cyberlink420. 118.21.142.128 +Don't sweat it. I'd be willing to bet that no one who has responded here is a stranger to frustration over differences of opinion. We all get a little wikistress from time to time. I'm pretty sure they'd be willing to forgive and forget. +" Rollback I addressed your concerns but a bot wiped them out to the archive. And see User talk:Nakon. Thanks. echo " +Antichrist Superstar Most articles include parodies or alternatives. So shouldn't there be a section offering the sucessful parody Antichrist Superstar for reference or comparison? Just thought there should be some more choice.Mutlee +" Funny, I didn't even know about the first block. It was only after seeing your heading that I scrolled through and found it. Sorry, I missed it. That an admin who persistently ignores the grossest incivility from his buddy with the apparent WP:POINT-violating intention of disrupting Wikipedia by attempting to silencing an opponent who has successfully exposed the deep-seated problems at CfD. There have been a few dozen articles I hadn't gotten around to creating, and I'll use the time to write those articles; Meanwhile, I will sit back and enjoy, watching how Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 April 28#Category:Knuckleball pitchers in which consensus is clear that the close was in clear violation of Wikipedia policy will be a first step towards ending the reign of error at CfD. " +" Chart and [eaks I edited the name of the ""Charts"" section to ""Charts and peaks."" This was reverted a couple of times. My argument on naming the section as such is that the old title does not describe it well. It is not only a list of charts... it also shows the peaks. I wanted to post this up here to see who would argue or disagree to in my opinion a better tittle. " +Warning regarding your vandalism on theTurk Telekom Arena page Please stop vandalising the Telekom Arena page. WP is not your local sports cafe. You already vandalised the page twice and the third will be reported to administration with a request to get your account blocked. Please proceed with contributing edits rather than filling pages with unsourced, biased information. This is your only warning. 78.171.36.170 Ulan dallama TT Arena GSGM'nin bilmiyorsan aç öğren. Ama biliyorsun ve burayı yanlış bilgiyle kirletiyorsun. Bu saçmalığı uzatırsan işin rengi değişecek sonra demedi deme. Uzattın şimdi. Bekle bakalım noluyor +Raylopez99 is the Subject/headline here Raylopez99 is the Subject/headline here (repeated) +The Anti-Hal Turner rhetoric has surpassed madness. You may not agree with his viewpoints, but he has the right to host his own website in which he espouses his own viewpoints. The amount of immature lies on this wiki is shameful. All posted by politically correct children, no doubt. It is a black mark against wikipedia that it is allowed to go on. No proof is offered in the slandering of his name. If you have a problem with Hal Turner, start you own anti-Hal website, wikipedia is no place for bald-faced lies. +If you know of reliable sources that can be used for a biography of a living person, then be WP:BOLD and edit the page. Add the content yourself. If you're not sure about that, then propose an edit here. +"Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. 123 (e) " +" Mini-episodes Currently, revived series mini-episodes such as ""Time Crash"", ""Pond Life"", ""The Night of the Doctor"", etc are listed among the television stories. However, they don't add to the story count. Should we set up a section for them in the ""Other stories"" category? I ask this mainly because other mini-episodes such as ""Attack of the Graske"" and ""Death is the Only Answer"" are counted there but not among the television stories. " +" In particular, the repeated use of the ""F"" word by a male editor at a woman editor should not be tolerated. " +Do ref's such as these potentially support both the use of the pedophile tag and explicit mention of Polanski as a convicted Pedophile? I think the article easily requires the tag and clearly supports use of the term but obviously requires consensus? How then to reconcile the facts with our entry?99.144.255.247 +Thanks for the info. The Wikiproject will be an effort to create a new category of games that require only common materials (i.e. dice, playing cards, pencil and paper). Is this legal? +THAT WAS REALLY MILLESECONDS WASNT IT BITCH FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEWFAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEWFAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEWFAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEWFAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT JEW FAT +Move discussion in progress There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Myanmar national football team - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. +" Energy development You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) " +" File:Bullet nose curve.PNG listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bullet nose curve.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. " +Hi Rex, nice to meet you. ) Kinda was feeling lonely like in hostile lands! For a while I thought Wikipedia is a place between Mecca and Medina. LOL 00:39 24 October 2005 +I'm happy to change to a New Username = Andrew Wilson. That's me. +That link is already there. — +10 years is temporary, similarly can be 100 years, but the best way is to not use the temporary word and state the present lack of capability rather than furtutistic words like temporary, hopefully, ... +Apparently the holotype and a few potential referred specimens are housed at the AMNH: News story about it here, maybe we could incorporate some of this into the article . I'm not sure if it's on display or not, or if any of the various small NJ museums would have casts or something. +Wow, I can't for the life of me figure out how it is getting so much traffic. It's doing better than Pinocchio himself most days! Funny how so many talk page haters keep showing up though. Perhaps they're jealous of its traffic? +Repeated vandalism by anon users Just thought I'd let you know that there are anonymous users using their IP's vandalising the page Battle of Hubbardton, deleting my source as a British / German victory and citing it as an American tactical victory. ( ) +, but it's nothing to do woth with religiousd belef eitherm, since the holocaust is not a religious belief +" To Be Or Not To Be (film) I've reverted your addition to this article because it violates several Wikipedia policies. Please read our policy on neutral point of view and the one on original research. The executive summary is this: please do not add your own personal opinions to article. Any opinion, interpretation or analysis must be accompanied by a citation from a legitimate reliable source that is qualified to express the opinion. If people consider this film ""the other Casablanca"", then surely someone with credentials must have written about it somewhere. Find that source, and you can use it to support adding the opinion to the article. Without such a source, though, the opinion cannot appear in the article. Thanks. " +I am sorry i don't live near the spick border and would favor five pens to write to my mother and feel her up in my basement. I will not intentionalli go and merss up urt Wipeipedia i know you cry lots and need much attention to feel important around those with bigger weiners than yours. I like google, do you? With one fell swoop great minds deleted four of the most important gears of wars mission +Mark Rich Connection Details on Marc Rich need to be clarified. He was indicted by US and left the US in 1983, well before the sandstorm report. +George was a presence, not just a footballer, but it all went wrong. Fatuorum +Dedicated to Andrew Hansen In tribute to Mr Ten Question's visit to Jimbo the Wales here be the truth Jimbo Wales...is a teenage drug lord from Malaysia. +" First off, your claims as to the type of image are debatable since it was clipped from the new trailer, but what would you recommend for this ""wallpaper""? Second, isn't the rationale obvious? ; Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. " +" You're both wrong. Stop this useless shouting match immediately. If you don't stop, I'll block you, and this goes for you both. - (conspire | past ops) " +I add some identical informations of foibe massacres: in fact is the same historic context! +Just when you thought they couldn't possibly get any dumber...66.177.73.86 +stop changing it back Fuck Off you little prick, stop changing it back that is the reason why we lost!!! +" Interesting links. Thanks. — Cpiral " +" I am not so sure that it eliminates things like population inversions, because one can I think describe them by suitably extended macroscopic variables. I stand to be corrected about this. One finds discussions of negative temperatures which I think refer to population inversions, and one recalls Lamb's paper ""Classical laser"", Borenstein, M., Lamb, W.E. (1972), Physical Review A 5(3):1298-1311. " +:How to post an article The article How to post an article has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +" Re: Smells Like Teen Spirit That is a real chart, and SLTS shows up on it. That chart is a ""component chart"", which is one of the three charts that combine to make the Hot 100. There is generally no reason to include it in an article, since the Hot 100 is typically already listed. If you want to keep the chart and reference it, then just use the link that you sent me here—its a reliable source. " +Carlo you should not have given in to the bully boy tactics of the arrogant egotist, who thinks wiki rules are god like/ You don't put in citations just because one person does not have easy access to the source and furthermore you certainly do not add citations when the info comes from the main sources; that's common sense. This man has written condescendingly and dismissively about your ROSEWALL and WORLD NUMBER ONE pages. If wiki rules were imposed on your fine work, it would be ripped to shreds jeffreyneave 2008 april 23 +" Nonsense sentence ""The international that runs through the bloodline is a system in a constant state of antagonism."" This does not make any sense. - Desertphile, Dec 23 2011" +" Hi, , and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement on Wikipedia. Thank You. Happy editing! Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia Editing a page The Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles (your way) Developing an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Wikipedia's Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Wikipedia Contribute to Wikipedia Be active at the Community Portal Follow the Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility" +(UTC) It comes from the seventh layer of hell and thats where it should stay, gross! 18:19, 9 September 2006 +No Copyrights/Credit Intended (A author's name of the Image must be presented in order to upload a Image to Wikipedia, as I do not no your name and you do not seem to have an Wikipedia Account I cannot place your name as the Author of the Image although you are the original owner of the Image, so please try and understand, thank you and Amen). (MarkMysoe) +Edit: There seems to be some confusion over whether perspicacite targetted one of my articles for deletion. He did, here , except he did it in unison with another user Zntrip. Zntrip however eventually withdrew his request for deletion and told perspicacite that he would not longer work with him against me on Press TV. See this comment by Zntrip. . That's how invidious his cyber-bullying is. He actually teamed up with someone to do it. +I think that is actually useful information that you've removed, angr. So, I've reverted it and added quotation marks. +" WP:FAC for lead(II) nitrate Yoh, PC, I just put the lead(II) nitrate article up for FA-class. Feel free to contribute your support. (Talk) ." +Don't use Wikipedia to advertise your website. While this encyclopedia does document notable websites, not all merit a mention. Yours in particular is lacking Alexa data, which in conjunction with the claims made about it in your own post, establish that it has not received sufficient attention or traffic to deserve an article. Wikipedia is not a venue by which you can change that fact. +May help with lower back pain???? The somewhat spurious and lukewarm health advice would be annoying in the Tai Ji Quan section for which it was intended, but it is here obviously out of place in the article discussing the philosophy of Tai Ji. May help with lower back pain.....hrumf! +This article needs a lot of cleaning up. Very badly written and sourced in parts +" Btw it's unwise to revert multiple editorseven if it appears they are incorrect. You'll just get blocked and they'll change the article while you're on ""vacation."" This is exactly what Scientiom did to Lsufalcon at HA. Just wait for other interested editorsi.e. meto show up. – Lionel (talk) " +Also, I asked if you wanted to be a jerk the first time. Apparently you chose in the affirmative. +"Chateau Carmel (6111 Glenmont) ""A NEW WAY TO FIGHT CRIME / Ministers trained in crisis, gang intervention do ride-alongs with police in effort to improve the quality of life in Gulfton / HPD, pastors work together"" - PACT Team initially focused on it and Napoleon Square " +" Mondegreen Let me refresh your memory, because I clearly see that regulations have somewhat obscured it. Quoting WP:Revert: ""if you feel the edit is unsatisfactory, then try to improve it, if possible - reword rather than revert."" I have not yet seen a single example of a ""chaste"" veteran Wikipedia editor who actually made the effort to find references for unsourced claims (although I strongly feel that in this case it was fitting the description of the main article subject, so why source the obvious?) rather than ruthlessly reverting, thus making other editors ""run errands."" Isn't that what Wikipedia should be about – mutual help by equally respected members of the community, regardless of the time they've been here? What I see instead is something like ""I'm just enforcing a policy by assigning a parking ticket. I know I might be wrong, but if you want to avoid paying the fine, better start running around... schnell! Hell, I'm not doing it for you, I got more heads to chop!"" " +Research Team Meeting Hi Mav, could you check your preferred times on Wikimedia Research Team#Next meeting for the first official IRC meeting of the WRT? Thanks, 18:50, May 31, 2005 (UTC) PS: I sent you a mail about the cafepress shop, did that ever get through? +" November 2007 (UTC) ""You are really trying to force a meaning into the 10C that is simply not there."" - Theis is the heart of the problem: who ""forced a meaning"" into the Second Commandment? - I or the falsifier rabbis? Do you mean that you blinly believe and quote an obviously falsified texts just because they are Orthodox interpretations? In other words, are you totally castrated, including guts, or simply circumcised??? I repeat my great source is the mere text of the Second Commandment and I say that the no WIKI rule shoiuld require a better source, so that any wikipedist may take the Second Commandment as specific reference, especially if this wikipedist chooses the Orhodox rabbis' translation (Paris: Editions Colbo; French Rabbinate) Sigismond 18:26, 17" +" Go to Special:RecentChanges and make 50 or so reverts, either manually, using the undo function, or with the script, twinkle. Once you have done this, go to WP:PERM/R and make a request. Regards, ''''''(TALK) " +"Fowlers Modern English Usage (Oxford), and he affirms that ""majority"" in this sense MUST have a plural verb. 11:18, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC) Then, consider that matter settled (guess I'll have to re-check AUE FAQ ;-)). FYI, it's the opposite in SCr the grammatical subject agrees with the verb rather than logical one. 15:07, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)" +" change in link to creationism Political positions Main article: Political positions of Sarah Palin See also: Public image and reception of Sarah Palin Palin has been a registered Republican since 1982, and has described the Republican Party platform as ""the right agenda for America"".[188] Palin is a social conservative. A lifetime member of the National Rifle Association (NRA), she believes the right to bear arms includes handgun possession, and is against a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons.[189] She has supported gun safety education for youth.[190] She supports capital punishment.[191] In a 2006 gubernatorial debate, responding to a question asking the candidates whether they would support teaching creationism in public schools, Palin stated that she supported teaching both @creationism@ and evolution. Shortly after that debate, however, Palin said in an interview that she had only meant to say she supports allowing the discussion of in public schools, the link to creatonism is on the word with the @ signs surrounding, it should be placed at the word with the # signs surrounding." +" File:Corruption Perceptions Index 2007.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Corruption Perceptions Index 2007.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. hi! " +134.69.4.156's edits Special:Contributions/134.69.4.156, which is an Occidental College IP range, apparently copied the article directly from an Oxy web page, . Comparing his last edit and the text there, they are virtually the same. We need to change it up a little, and add more outside/non-Oxy references. Probably whe he's invested on the 24th, there will be an article about him in the LA Times. , an Oxy student and the guy who started the Veitch article in first place +Translation question Hello! The word Straßendurchbrüche means, that they have torn down houses and other areas in order to be able to build the street. Feel free to ask, if you need further help! +to the admins when he could not provide reference material for his claims. That was his strategy of blocking anyone who disagrees with his views. +Shut the fuck you little anon, you don't know anything! +rules]]? Rule #4 is not a real rule +REDIRECT Talk:7mm Winchester Short Magnum +" Binky, grow up. All you want is to be obstructive and destructive of real info included on WP - you're solidly outed. You might as well admit it. At least to yourself. Over here you write: ""You know, I like your Strauss-Kahn addition, using good sourcing, but this bit about bootlegs is your weak area. You need to find a source that says that Fogerty's music can be found on bootlegs"": that being so, why don't you do it yourself, and thus help additions those less skillful at manipulating WP than you, try to contribute? Instead of actively deleting and obstructing the info being included, under increasingly fanciful pretexts (incidentally, ""source that says that Fogerty's music can be found on bootlegs"" is easily found on Youtube and elsewhere, e.g. http://www.freetimeweb.nl/home/muziek/ccr/johnfogerty_bootleg.html (I'm sure even you can google ""Fogerty bootleg"", though actually I didn't add that info - I only supplied the ref, before you deleted it all). But you deleted it or had it deleted, instead of supporting it with adjustments, as you could've done, improving instead of obstructing - how's that for an idea?). You appear to be an amateur psychopat, taking out your failed real life on innocents on WP. You a-soul. Be a good person. Instead of being destructive and obstructive, be constructive. If you know how - if not, try to learn. Even a miserable psychopat like you can turn around. Try. - Plus, incidentally, I haven't been edit-warring but reverting your edit-warring and vandalism (check history if you suddenly don't recall - but your memory is tendentially selective, I'm sure, recalling only that which supports your lies, right?). I'm no expert at WP and have no time to become one - I only wanted to contribute, not to get embroiled with an apparent psychopat like you. Plus re new IPs: if frequent power-outages happen to change my IP, don't flatter yourself that it's in response to your unacceptable behaviour: you're not on par with hurricane Nina. At all. You're merely a small gust temporarily confusing, but achieving nothing - except making people tire of you. You really are a tiresome fogey, as demonstrated when you write and admit: ""despite the truth of what you were inserting"". Well, that truth being so, why don't you help fix it, instead of hounding away the contributor? But you apparently don't think facts should have primacy on WP, rather your quarrelling should, right? - I'm no expert on the rules you misuse, and won't waste time to become one - as I have a real life. I merely contribute where I can, as an attitude to life. Try it. You might like it. Actually -). Instead of perfecting being an apparent grumpy old man and failed psychopat, scouring WP for victims. You won, because I'm not interested in your fight. Now you've successfully excluded good info from WP, info which even you concede is ""the truth"". That's a pyrrhic victory if ever there was one. Hope this little letter changes you for the better, because that's truly needed. Try it: Help info get on to WP, instead of picking quarrels by deleting what even you call ""the truth"". Focus on getting correct info on to WP, instead of getting lost in ""the system"". - That's just an idea, but think it over. It might do you good. Get well soon. Bye now. Your ""IP-guy"" - Kris. 80.212.13.234 " +" I don't know that Carsten Hansen is little-known, but the relevant question is whether he is a ""reliable source"". He has been rated as high as 2560, written four well-reviewed chess books, and drawn 3 out of 3 games against Kasparov. As for the capitalization, it is as in the original. He wrote, ""I have seen thousands of chess books over the years, but this book is by far THE WORST BOOK I HAVE EVER SEEN."" I have no problem with the omission of the Bücker/Myers quote, even though I am the one who put it in. " +" Wikipedia Cat Lovers' Committee , from your userboxes, I can see that you love cats. Would you be interested in joining the Wikipedia Cat Lovers' Committee? If you want to join, you can add yourself to the members list and contact the committee founder, me, on my talk page. Thank You. Talk  Contribs " +Mhm fun fun. I'd like to visit some time, but I've heard rumours that price gouging is about the least of my worries when I get there. +Great. Actually a script that would help editors monitor solely prodded articles would be very valuable indeed! I usually don't have a problem because I monitor my watchlist very actively, but as it gets bigger and bigger (inevitable), it will become more difficult (I have about 3,000 pages watchlisted currently). Any chance you could describe that script in more detail or post is somewhere? I find that many articles you wouldn't think would make it to the end of Prod actually do, despite that I mostly prod brand new articles and normally leave a on the creator's page. Anyway, the reason I left the message is because many, many editors are unfamiliar with prod and if it was more consistenlty used, we'd all save buckets of time. Cheers. +I wanted to let you know that Tymon.r. is a stupid moron. +Mercosul. I did what you said, but the name Mercosul already exist before I did. The name should be in portuguese not in spanish, because portuguese is much more spoken inside the Mercosul. +" name was Willie, and he said he was standing about three people away from Elvis at the Patton Hotel in the fifties, and he overheard Elvis say, ""All a nigger can do for me is buy my records and shine my shoes.""" +I advise you to ignore this editor. I'm 99% certain it's evading his ban again. +" Further discussion An unregistered editor just edited Oregon State University and asserted that it's a flagship university citing only this reference. It's a reliable source but it's really, really weak evidence for such an important claim. The paper was released ten years ago and classifies institutions as ""flagships"" based on data that were already over ten years old when the paper was released which means the data are now more than twenty years old. The document was published as an NBER working paper which means that it may have undergone some sort of review process but it was not published in a peer-reviewed journal or other venue where we are assured of editorial oversight and quality control (although I assume that the NBER has those kinds of mechanisms in place; I just don't know for sure). This single piece of weak evidence is entirely insufficient to justify such a strong claim. Here's an article that references OSU as a flagship university that also passes WP:RS and is far more recent: Source. That doesn't explicitly call OSU a flagship though, just that according to the author of the article there are two flagships. For all we know the author could think WOU and EOU are the flagships. Personally, I think OSU shouldn't be listed as flagship if you do a quick search for UO's flagship status, there are comparatively many many more sources backing that up. 65.78.144.35 Actually, the The Bulletin article implies that the chancellor of the Oregon University System said that the two institutions are flagships. But it's not a direct quote so it's not entirely clear if that is something the chancellor said or the reporter's opinion or interpretation. Without knowing which of those two possibilities is correct, this is pretty weak source, too. There have been several discussions and edit wars about the flagship status (or lack thereof) of several universities lately so I apologize if I'm repeating myself but I urge you to consult the sources in Flagship; they're pretty good sources and include many of the most authoritative on this very subjective, murky, and ill-defined topic. You'll be on much better ground if you can cite sources written by experts in higher education. " +Royal Soc records Royal Society link - his entry in the list of Fellows Proposed as FRS by John Hunter; C Blagden; Everard Home; Wm Watson; Samuel Glasse: > a copyright Roy Soc image: picture of a cuckoo being fed Buried: The chancel of Berkeley parish church, Gloucestershire (from RS) +OK, I've set up the merged article Regular and irregular verbs. It still needs quite a bit of work, but that's true anyway of both of the current separate articles. Before embarking, I'd like to see if there are any objections to the principle of combining the articles. The rationale for doing so is contained in my comment immediately above. +Cthulhu in popular culture FilkerTom has been re-included in the above article. If someone more expert in his output would help in referencing the note on him, I'd be grateful. (t, c) +going on logic alone +We could have a go at it if you like, but probably best not to start until after this year's Halloween. Looks like it needs a lot of TLC though. Fatuorum +What? Can you be more specific, wiki-stalker? 119.92.93.84 +Yunshui already got the opportunity to say what he wanted to say above, and I thanked him for it in my ES. Any further comments grossly misrepresenting my reasoning above is unnecessary and uncalled for (∴ gravedancing). — +"Please be careful when you add comments to a discussion not to delete content or templates from the page, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donier Tyler. Thank you! ~81(C) " +why i can't find nothing about blas de lezo too?Are you trying to avoid the truth? if yes let me know =) you are engagin in original research +He said I removed his addition but that did never happen. +I'm a little confused I'm not sure what I can do to help but feel free to ask. +photo I see this article is up to Wikipedia's usual standards. A fake photograph is put in, with a vague caption, so that people hopefully pass over it and think they are seeing Solzhenitsyn being searched in prison. This isn't enough for Stacker, who removes the correct caption due to his desire to make people think they are seeing the real thing. I don't suppose this is much different from standard Wikipedia lies about the Soviet Union, Venezuela, Iraq or so forth, but I'll correct it anyway. I know most of Wikipedia is a bunch of half-baked lies and propaganda of this type, but once in a while people will read this and realize this is just another lie and distortion on Wikipedia in the service of a certain cause. I find it humorous how while the reality of Solzhenitsyn's anti-semitism is removed from this article, the non-reality of this picture increases in Wikiality. +" I admit Hey asshole, this is ♣ Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣. I'm the sockpuppet who was sending personal abuse among others. This is my secret account, which I kept a secret for a long time. I'm going to send personal abuse to other users ASAP, so you better block me on both account before I send personal abuse, asshole..." +Peacemaker67 and PRODUCER are revert waring and not discuss changes on talk. +The more sources you can find/contribute, the better! +Way too much speculation here. For the purposes of this article we have to consider Eternals, Deviants and Inhumans to be seperate races, albeit ones that can interbreed with humans. Your suggestion would make the article far too unmanageable. +So where could I propose this change? +You talked and You removed his leanings towards Sufism.There is nothing which can be said Unwarranted.Each heading or each line on the Article need not be sourced.Though Article is well sourced. +" ""Convicted stalker""??? Conviction is criminal, and I guarantee you I've never been convicted of anything more than moving violations. Multiple background checks (with fingerprints) have been conducted when I applied at various times for certain licenses handled by agencies that used to have 3 letters for a name. I invite you to retract your libel. " +I agree with all the arguments for the currently used map, which has more information. +" User name Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Official Iowa State Fair, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it it represents an organization rather than an individual. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. ChatMe!ReadMe!! " +Where is that discussion? I can't find it anywhere on the page you linked me. +For future reference (whenever I do edit) I will try to scope a page to see if a fact tag is needed or not. It will take time to get used to so mistakes will be made. Do we take this discussion out of the admins page? +Thanks Thanks for watching My talk page. I noticed a lot of vandalism to it. This same vandal is messing wiktionary to the point that they had to blacklist the whole AOL ip range from editing. My user page has been vandalised as well. , Thursday March 16 2006 at 18:31 +What a retard, that . Shut your FUD up, you are not the good guy, Scientus is. [[User:Williamimm]William Immendorf] ([[User talk:Williamimm]talk]) 7:35AM CST, October 21, 2009 +Here is another good example that proves this debate, this article written by John Manley uses both Labor and Labour. Labor is used in reference to old publications and organization names such as The Canadian Labor party and uses the modern Labour when he is talking generally about Labour. We should be accurate in preserving original names as much as possible. The name Canadian Labour party does not jive with primary sources. +" Dweller, I'm not sure how you can reconcile ""genuinely want to reduce the heat"" with ""Bearing in mind the results of your two attempts to have me banned for non-existent harassment, of course, Exxolon."" Seems contradictory, somehow... SarekOfVulcan (talk) " +" Allready done. Pozz ašo " +I shall go ahead and do it. 86.146.153.231 +"Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Martin Luther King, Jr.. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) " +" Sorry, being a fan of wrestling I would assume that one of J.R's famous quotes would be ok to use, considering that Daniels was left ""battered & bloody"" after the match. If it is not notable, then why IS it notable that Sonjay attacked Nash? Jay316 " +I have removed the flagging and ask that it not be reinstated until some reasonable discussion has taken place. +" Requested move 14 July 2015 Requested move 14 July 2015 :Guilty (disambiguation) → – The primary redirect target is split between the subjects at Guilt (emotion) and Guilt (law), both highly known usages of the word. For this reason, the disambiguation page should move to the base title due to both targets having an equally-strong association with the term ""guilty"". " +Date formats in citations As per Template:Cite web and any other citation template, stop changing date formats on cites to non-ISO 8601 formats and stop wikilinking access dates in cites as you've done so in this and many other edits. '''''' +" Department Of Agriculture i had to edit that page because some wrote ""TABFederal government of the United gays"" which is obvious vandalism." +I think he looks like a Egyptian Pharaoh and should be nicknamed Babahotep The Pharaoh. +Tanakh / Torah / Old Testament I noticed you had difficulty accepting category additions of Old Testament on several biblical articles. For Christians we do not call it the Torah or the Tanakh. Many Christians would not know what these words mean. For those who do not follow those names I was placing categories that would make sense to Christians. This was for navigation purposes. I see no problem in having the additional categories. I also noticed that you might you might be considering my changes vandalism. It is unfortunate that you would think that. My efforts are pure and true and I don't see how any of my changes could be vandalism. It was my understanding that Wikipedia was meant for all people of all faiths and understandings. By not allowing Christians the proper category to navigate through articles you are denying us that privilege. Thank you for you time. +" Page Macedonia recent edit wars Even if generally you are somewhat of an unexpressed Greek supporter, I'd like to hear your opinion on the matter: since the last consensus from 12:10, 12 November 2008 was interrupted with the POV edit ""term mainly used by Republic of Macedonia"", with no evidence/sources submitted, this page has been a target of several disruptive editors and revert wars ; Despite the fact that we have submitted evidence that this is not a ""term mainly used by Republic of Macedonia"": Britannica , And many other international sources from Google Scholar and there is not a single source or evidence that conferms this ""mainly used by Republic of Macedonia"" this disruptive revert editors have continued to push this POV. What is your opinion on the matter? " +New sources {{cite news }title=Ex-NHL great Rick Martin had degenerative brain disease: Researchers concerned CTE found in non-enforcer's brain tissue |publisher=CBC News |date=Oct 5, 2011 |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/10/05/rick-martin-cte-brain-national.html }} +Your Message, 2 Are you referring to College Hill? Those are the overviews, duh! Do I have to break everything down? +Invitation to WikiProject recruitment for WikiProjects Traditional unionist, Would you be interested in trying to make your (proposed) WikiProject becoming a succes by actively involving yourself in a recruitment agency aimed at establishing an active base of participants for a WikiProject? +Unfortunately it is the repetitive component that is problematic, as it is all there in the FCB, where such information is currently placed. +" reply Thanks so much for your friendly welcome User:WillKomen. I can't wait to start editing! user:WillKomen // Editor " +After a request from Mr Chess - I've uploaded the bridge pic to Commons as well. Have a beer for me! (Talk!) +" According to those SPI notices: I am the SockMaster, and experienced users, Administrators and Check Users are my sockpuppets ???????????? Female Wikipedians are also my sockpuppets . Good thing: removed those violent comments by Bangali pigs. He hates Bengalis so much. Alison Favonian found as Sock of AHLM13 as mentioned on his User talk:Pakistan Commando Force. AHLM13 had extremely bag grammar. Something is not adding up. Can he form multiple personality like OccultZone? One account with good English and another account with intentional bad English?Feel very bad for Cullen. He answered my questions on TeaHouse.   Emperor  " +- Seconded , section does read better now. +" Image:Warminster patch.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Warminster patch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. (talk) " +" I just now noticed that you have edited out the ""autobiographical"" phrase in that first sentence. Thank you. An alternate, and perhaps better action would have been to strike out the words because then, if anyone happens to encounter this thread in the future, it would be a little easier to understand why I responded as I have done, e.g., ""Despite the quote, this section strongly suggests more than a casual contact (and perhaps autobiographical) component."" I appreciate this constructive gesture. " +It seems to me they should be merged. In the meantime I added a link. +Buddhist doctrines There has been too little emphasis on buddhist doctrines. The language is terse and difficult to understand. we need to present the doctrines in a clear and concise manner that even a child can understand. Metaphysical aspects can be dealt with seperately. This is the opening page of Buddhism. lets not loose the practical- social spirit of buddhism and indulge in other worldly persuits and metaphysical concepts. I intend to simply the meaning of each and every term given in the doctrines. and add a few more doctrines like the law of kamma. +" Hi HI Julian, knock knock. Can you let the bald guy in. I'm refraining from joining in at the village pump but can I just say that the idea of the bot creating a few articles automatically is so many editors such as myself can no longer spend all our time creating articles on geo stubs and trying to address the huge bias on here, but can focus on quality, on building up stubs to start class articles. I dedicate a lot of time to wikipedia and creating new articles but if I could soley spend my editing time on here writing the articles things would be looking a lot better. $1,000,000? " +No, but you should be able to comment on-topic on the main points, which I have elaborated on most clearly. You have for the most part ignored my explanations, then claimed I did not consider your objections, eventually resorting to personal remarks which more than backfired on you. If you could keep to the subject matter it would be much more productive. François Robere (talk) +Churchy Hi. Thanks for passing on the message to Glen. I've got patchy access today and dunno if I'll be around much. Thanks for finishing the domestic section when my monobooks sent my PC haywire yesterday. One small point - have you seen my comment on the article talk page re season naming? I think the Peer Review is sufficiently advanced to make it worth taking this to FAC. Opinion? Your turn to gloriously nom. +" Ok, let me say it again Come on, now you guys are just being piece of shit jews. I mean you have to admit, the guys in pink floyd play their instruments about as slow as a nigger works. I shouldn't even call what they play music. It's just a bunch of alarm clocks and cashier regirsters! But you know what the most pretentious thing about them is, its their lyrics. All af their songs are just surrealist poetry sung over doom-noise pop, and everyone starts calling them genius's over it. The truth is, their songs have no meaning. Take the album ""The Wall"" for instance; sure it tells a story, but what is the moral and the meaning of the story? And dont tell me that the purpose of their songs is to make you think. The only way that music as slow as pink floyd could make you fucking think is if you were just as stoned as they are, which you kikes probly are... And one last time: 1) pink floyd fucking sucks 2) david fuckmor should taste my ass 3) you should to" +Your edit to Nicola Roberts Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +Hey user:jeppiz I was busy a little bit the last week in molesting your own mother, but now I am back. +Jim I swear don't you ever tell me what to do again or things are going to get messy up in here. You stay out of the little quarrel between myself and +" The only thing I can imagine that would excuse it (apart from being a true story after all, which is very doubtful) is that he created the page from a request on ""request for article creation"" (I don't know the exact name, so can't link it, butwe do have something like that floating around). If that's the case, then he just AGF too much and didn't check enough, which is slightly careless but not a serious mistake. I hope this is the case, otherwise I would indeed raise it at ANI. " +" Invitation For Wikipedia's 11th Anniversary! An invitation for you to come and join us for Wikipedia's 11th Anniversary in Delhi on the 15th Jan 2012: Click here for more details. Will be great to see you! ) " +ScJessey is a Big Fat Faggot Pinko Commie Asshole +oi Rror Fuck you. wikipedia sucks and so do you for editing my posts, asshole +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Lily Allen. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. +if you take a look at the discussion and the tags added you will see the issue. Blade is not listening to what I am saying nor is he reading about what those tags are for. You CANNOT put article tags on a section, they belong at the top of the article. ALSO, if the body has inline tags there is no need to duplicate with a section tag. Also, if the issue if ref you do not just throw an Original research tag for good measure. Tags must reflect accurately the issue under discussion OR is not one of them. +" Incidents section This section seems to be getting too long. Incidents like this: ""On 4 and 5 February 2009, two separate armed holdups occurred at Subway Stations on the Spadina Line. Both occurred shortly before the end of subway service in the early hours of the morning. The first robbery occurred at Lawrence West Station where the thieves made off with an undisclosed amount of cash. The following night an attempt was made at Yorkdale Station however the would be robbers did not get any money. Since the incidents the TTC has stepped up its visual presence of Supervisory Staff on the system in the evening.[33]"" ...are hardly unique and probably have happened dozens of times since the subway opened. It seems to be more appropriate a section for truly unique occurrences, like the deadly collision " +from articles like the endiandric acid C. +Not a football specific ground Is there any reason why the Liberty Stadium is marked as such, but Huddersfield and Bristol Rovers are not? +Answered at Talk:Pseudoinverse. +" Personally, I would have to disagree. The reason mainly being, as the famous wikipedia user box goes “even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake."" What I mean is, glancing at wikipedia, is the general process of the media or public to gain a quick background knowledge of an individual. I think it’s important to make the distinction in all areas and I believe that by doing this, it would prevent people from simply naming him cofounder without have looking at the full story. I think wikipedia has the responsibility as the primary source of quick information to make sure its got the correct story in all places. To paraphrase the above user box.. If 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's wikipedia's job to set them straight. Obviously this is just my personal opinion. Thanks. DocHeuh " +" Just between us pooches, the article is still effectively unsourced. It's got a few citations, but they are blogs, a disciples website, a TV schedule grid which says nothing about the programs shown (though it's not obvious if the subject even appears on the grid). So no RS to establish N. I left a note on his talkpage. come howl! " +United States Bill of Rights has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011 As one of the editors who has made improvements to the United States Bill of Rights article recently this notice has been left to inform you that it has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011. The goal this month is to get this article to Good Article standards or better by July 4th, 2011. You can also vote for next months article of the Month or submit a candidate for article of the month here. +Your Position What are you? A mall security guard who couldn't make the police force yet dreams of having power over people? The tone in which you write is almost robotic in its slavish lust for wikipolicy, if Jimbo Wales told you to kill someone I honestly belive you would do it as per some new wikimurder rule. I think maybe you should take a few months away from this website, rebuild your real life, and retern with an eye to being less tight assed than you have been in the past. Its just wikipedia, not life or death, but you honestly write like its your lifes goal to make this thing as good as it can be. If some unsourced material makes it into a low level article on a cartoon then ITS OK, your life will go on, and all the people who read said article will survive the experience. Relax, take a break, and come back a better editor. PS could you stop writing on everyones talk pages with advice/threats/dictates, remember you are not an admin, and even if you were, you have no right to lecture others how to behave- you have no authority whatsoever. +":::: ""I will ignore but rest assured that, should you cause any further disruption to articles or talk pages, I will report you and ask that you be blocked longer than you were last time."" Seems your only response is violence? Am i right.... American self appointed dictator asshole? Whats the matter? Cant handle it when it gets tough? Sometimes the other one hits back and what do you do American fag? Run home to mother you fuck. " +Fixed. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) +" I like to believe I've been polite and courteous throughout this process. However extensive detailing of evidence and making recommendations of limitations on other editors' actions feels inherently rude and discourteous, no matter how justified or necessary it seems in my opinion. Again, thank you for your input and feedback, to me and to this case. My apologies for essentially duplicating info above which is more properly appropriate for the arb case pages. Your talk page is not the proper forum. My judgment can be a little faulty sometimes but I'm working on it. Talk to me " +In order to be accurate and specified, Wikipedia should not intervene in this name dispute. The name of this country is contemporary and has nothing to do with historical references. As a result until both countries reach a consensus, Wikipedia have to admit the temporary name (F.Y.R.O.M.) +" I understand what you're saying, but this is not a disciplinary measure, it is further offence as an admin not only attacks my WQA response, but then conceals their attack by turning my behaviour into hyperbole to reduce their guilty. I don't apologise to people with such motives, or who serve protect themselves. The project only risks degenerating when sysop is left in the hands of people who abuse it. I maintain that the block is a front, a pretext. If reviewing admins are failing to take time to determine that and recognise the integrity of my claim, instead of taking Fram's for granted, which is contrary to ""we're all equals on wiki"", then I will have no choice but to raise the matter elsewhere, such as RfC or ArbCom. This isn't about discipline, at my age I don't consider ""you can't login"" as anything like you suggest, because it's not like losing wages. It's the principle of the matter. My contribs to WQA were meticulously used as spin against me, instead of the AGF everyone else saw them as. I don't intend to let Fram sit on a high horse any longer. Either they apologise first and withdraw their false assertions, or they'll have to explain them to RfC or ArbCom. Which I'm sure is much more complex and time consuming and stressful than admitting to any wrong-doing, but so be it, I stand for what I believe in and always have. I won't be bullied by someone like that. So really, the ball is in their court. If no one is counting coup, that applies to the admin who attacked me in an undignified manner, and continues to do so by maintaining their position – though now shielding themselves behind a wall of admins instead of facing up to the fact they erred. COI is clearly affecting their actions, or unwillingness to show face. They can either opt-in and admit they were wrong for their attack, or wait until a higher channel, one that even exceeds their stance, asks why they attacked my contribs and synthesised a despicable ""bad faith"" conclusion. The consequences this dispute have yet to be determined.  [Chat • RFF] " +" User: KI LOL Thought you might appreciate this quote from Ki's userpage (which seems to have been hit by actual Wiki-vandals?!?!? (() Opposes * Userboxes. * Hu Jintao * The House of Saud. * To the death penalty. ** Censorship – online or off for minors or adults. ** < LULZ Anyway. Hopefully he didn't scare you off too much. Believe me, I've seen my fair share of ""stop the vandalism"", and his does not read like a Wiki-official. It's sad what too much marijuana and belief in the Falun Gong can do to a mind." +" Collapse by consciousness? Face the consequences! If we take the ""collapse by consciousness"" viewpoint then: Consequence 1. In famous experiments with entanglement (Aspect's, and other), thousands of entangled pairs are created and measured, each pair during a microscopically short time; no human observes individual results in real time (and usually, never at all); rather, a computer registers them, calculates frequencies (statistical averages) and displays these to a human observer. Does it mean, thousand of collapses? No; rather, a single collapse after the whole experiment. No definite values for individual spin projections; only a definite value for the average. Consequence 2. Do you believe that human consciousness acts on the microsecond scale? Probably not. Probably, on the scale of seconds. Then, a collapse takes about seconds. Then, entanglements could be relevant to faster-than-light communication only on distances of million kilometers (or so). Definitely irrelevant in all experiments performed for now (on the Earth) or planned in the near future. " +huh? he is NOT notable- 6 months in a sub-supporting role. STRONG DELETE. +" ""Wong and McKeen"" Citation Greetings. I have added a reference to the section in question. Can I removed the ""Citation Needed"" alert now? Thanks. " +Jeeny's being a bitch, don't listen to her. 222.153.110.86 +I hate you How dare you delete my post. You better put it back or I am going to fuck you up +If ROOm c continues to remove our link from wikipedia, +You know who I am Big Brother +" Was that a ""yes"" or a ""no""? I assure you I am not playing games. This is quite an important point. SlimVirgin did raise the issue of tautology and I addressed it by saying that we need to write about welfare in the context of non-human animals. You seem to think this is an impossible task, since we are human. I reject this idea. We can write about many non-human things. Obviously, our ability to know about the welfare of a dog (for example) is limited by the fact that we are not dogs, but that does not change what animal welfare is. " +" But you ""don't think this is personal""? " +" Okay, lets build a consensus. I see no reason why you would oppose the above proposal. The specifics of which is of course up for debate. DocHeuh " +Just because one article does it (incorrectly), doesn't mean they all can. 220.245.146.235 +RfA Hi Ultraexactzz! Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. I hope not to let you and the others down, and use the tools for the benefit of the project. Cheers, (Talk) +Template expansion in Live Preview? Any chance that you will be able to expand template inside the Live Preview box? +Trying to distinguish the medical nature of the death from the proximate cause seems inappropriate because the sources don't do this and it leads to original research, as discussed above. Such deaths are events in which the circumstances and details combine to make them both unusual and noteworthy. +Geonotice Hi Tom Morris, what was the problem here? When I added th, it was as they were added in this edit. Was there an error that I didn't see? (It is not easy, to me anyway, to preview that page for how it appears in the watchlist.) Thanks! +Do you research, find the sources yourself and see that I am right. I was BROUGHT UP with this music, message the bands and you will have your sources. I will give you links to their official pages if you desire. I did not insult you, I schooled you. Seems to me, you can't take it. It is not my personal opinon at all, it is a fact and if you message the bands you will see it. Block me if you like, but it just shows that you're site in an unreliable information source. Which it is. I came here to help but seems you like being wrong about everything here. +My day == Many thanks for that! I will aim to enjoy it. Happy Christmas & New Year to you & yours. My Wiki-Christmas card is here. == +Request re Tajik's attacks Khoikhoi, I would like to ask you to warn or explain to User:Tajik that he needs to take it easy and stop personal attacks upon me on Talk:Safavid_dynasty. I am not posting this to Wikipedia:ANI as not to create extra thread and conflict, but this really needs to stop. Please, look at some of his quotes: - You are by far the biggest hypocrite on the talk page, Atabek. - You proved your hypocracy even with the source you added to the text - you are totally incapable of properly discussing certain issues - Since User:Atabek constantly vandalizes other Wikipedian's edits I am frankly tired of these baseless accusations, when I tried hard and came to consensus with several users on Safavid Dynasty page. Also, I would like to stop this battle, as user Tajik just does not want to agree with facts, so is there any way, we can put this page into independent arbitration? Thanks. +Honor Badge For your hard work on Wikipedia, Vorox the Glatorian has given you this Agori Honor Badge. It is Rank 1. Good Work. You earned it. Vorox +Stubby He did have a short neck, maybe thats why they didnt hang him. Thank You, Margeret Suckley-Maple Hts Ohio.... +" Some more input might be helpful in getting a conclusive result in one or another direction. ''''''Talk " +" The founder's definition is being ""Cited"" as the description of the organization. Neutrality is preserved by that position. You are suggesting that you are more equipped to define the group moreso than the founder and I as a contributor have decided to cite the founders definition. " +Yeah, you need to say why you're citing an opinion of a tiny group of fanatics and reverting back on all your week long claims before... +I know my bothering again is probably unwelcome but thanks for saying that about me. So I have to say, some of you communists are alright. Okay well thanks again, and bye. +I note that the article on Sanchez still omits the documented fact that he was a male prostitute. Wikipedia will never publish this fact, because it intends to protect Sanchez. By the time it's finished, Wikipedia will omit Sanchez's history as an actor in dozens of gay porn movies, too. It has already reduced the number of his films from the true total, nearly 40, to only 12, and lists only six of them. Soon that will be reduced even further. +" Epiwafer I am surprised to learn that ""epiwafer"" was a popular term right around 2000-2002, the exact time that my company started to use epi wafers. I should pay more attention to ads, I guess. Anyway, it quickly settled back to more normal terminology, like ""epitaxial wafer"", looks like. I guess another move is in order. Hi , I think it best to look at all those Google searches on the Talk page, and see which spelling/nomenclature adding the web + book, singular + plural spellings (that's four searches for each spelling) has the most hits, for the title of the article. If you want, I can do that and add them up. Of course, the company name will skew ""epiwafer"" so we can exclude that if you like. We don't use plurals, and book searches are generally more authoritative than web searches, but feel free to provide more data. Plurals are for the Google searches, because obviously many of the mentions (even in books) are only in plural, not singular, so an exact-phrase Google search (i.e., in quotation marks) will omit those mentions unless a plural form is searched. I'm fine with the fully spelled-out version as long as all of the other spellings redirect to it; therefore should probably also create a redirect for Epi-wafer, since that hyphenated form is sometimes used as well. Yes, good point(s). " +It is NOT about interpretations. These are clear descriptions in a clear quote. But, let us put it this simple. If any person can tell us about any place in the far west that has these descriptions other than Yellowstone, then I have no right to argue or re-add that quote in Yellowstone pages again. It is this simple. It is NOT about anybody interpretations +" ""Universally Positive"" Hi. I think it depends where you place the emphasis - I agree that the game has universally received positive reviews, but ""universally positive"" could be taken to mean that each review was universally positive (ie. without criticism) about the game, which is clearly not the case (the next paragraph shows that). So, semantics notwithstanding, may I have another attempt at nuancing this? Thanks " +" Talkback I'm not sure whether you're following the discussion, so I thought I'd let you know here that I've responded to the linked thread. — (talk) " +Why? What else did they say to you Future? +Image:150px-Borneol.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:150px-Borneol.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +My thought is that you have to start someplace. Generally all I stumble across is a one line item about current prices. The rest is implied for a knowledgeable audience (which Wikipedia is not for maple syrup, I agree). This, in turn, attracts other data for comparison. The alternative (as mentioned above) is a robust article which I am too lazy to flesh out. I do start articles, but once there they provide a convenient uh coat hook to paste other information as encountered in the media. Footnoting and objectivity is the main problem. I agree that readability for one point of data is a bit, well, jerky, I suppose. But this is a lot different from pov, or, pr, unreferenced, or any of the other stuff that the noprices was trying to avoid. While we are trying to make things presentable for the reader, we also need to consider the editor. Things have to be easy for them, as well. The harder it is to contribute, the fewer contributions. +" It does look suspicious, and the IP - 68.194.254.7 - does match most of 68.194.235.103, the IP from the previous case. I would say go ahead and create another case at WP:SPI. — (say whaaat?!) " +Dodo is a she (allegedly). You are wasting your time trying to reason with her as anyone who has ever dealt with her will testify. Not even sure why she has her hand in the pot here either as she has never even owned a pedigree dog or been to a dog show - perhaps she feels because she watched the program she is now an expert is this field too. Its amazing what a fews years experience as a second rate kitten farmer qualifies you to comment on! +Notes This template puts pages into Category:Requests for unblock. Abuse of this template may result in your talk page being protected. Do not subst this template. See also Category:User block templates Category:Unblock process ar:قالب:رفع المنع es:Plantilla:Desbloquear fr:Modèle:Déblocage he:תבנית:בקשת שחרור חסימה ja:Template:Unblock ko:틀:보호 문서 편집 요청 pt:Predefinição:Revisão de bloqueio ro:Format:Deblocare ru:Шаблон:Unblock sv:Mall:Avblockering zh:Template:Blocks review +" I'm just saying, if in future you notify people of AfD and AN/I, using AN/I as a last resort, per WP:DR, then I'm happy.:) So let's put it behind us. Parkin " +" Milton, MA Hey Markles, I was hoping you could tell me what you think about an ongoing problem with the article for Milton, MA. Certain editors have been including information in the introduction which seems not to be appropriate, almost invariably unreferenced and unverifiable claims about the ""irish"" nature of East Milton. The edits are often made by anonymous IP addresses, and the issue has been ongoing for at least a year now. Could you please take a quick look at the article's history and talk page and tell me what you think? It just seems a shame that a pretty decent article is constantly being let down in the introduction. Thanks. Talk " +Yes, because Raven-Symoné is a double-barrelled first name, just like Mary-Kate and Malcolm-Jamal. +This image is not Orphaned, it WILL be placed back in the article soon. +What I'm trying to say is, angles don't come to mind in the context of mathematical orbits. The concept of an orbit doesn't even require that you're in a metric space. It certainly doesn't guarantee Euclidean geometry. So talking about angles, and a property of those angles that doesn't even hold for most cases, seems beside the point. +" By the way, I looked at that article but couldn't make sense of it, except that it makes prominent use of a trite cliche (""Main Street and Wall Street."" " +I am not putting my personal opinion in the page of Nancy Pelosi. If I would do so, I wouldn't provide citations. All my citations were from profounded sources. What is your problem. Please, specify your concerns. The other issue might be that you are a pro-armenian editor, who wants to protect Nancy. +SAID I SHOULD PUT SOAAP IN MY MOUTH AND I SAID Y. U VANDALISED MORE THAN ME +Follow the link from your wikli .. to the ACTUAL seeVote.com website.. you can see for yourself that your wiki is InCORRECT.. Either take off the link or correct the definition please. I am only attempting to prevent your wiki from broadcasting OBVIOSLY wrong and misleading inforamtion about my invention. you suggest I write seeVote in my own words. now what? It IS IS IS in my own words ... I invented seeVote. thanks for taking the time to understand the situation. If I could describe seeVote in other words .. then I'd use those words for the website too. PS ..seeVote.com is not copyrighted. Your are too quick to judge! Where does it say it has a copyright? Maybe I should make the seeVote website wrong .. so that you will accept the correct definition .. then Ill revert the website back.. but that seems silly. I thank you for your time, seeVoteDan +Vandalism I'd like to remind you that vandalism is never acceptable on Wikipedia, and is a bannable offense regardless of whether you revert it yourself. Please don't do anything like this again. Thanks. | Talk +Personal and Family Life Is it necessary to mention that the baby boy Andre Agassi's wife Steffi Graf gave birth four days after marriage was a result of being physically intimate even before marriage?... I am not very sure.....I feel it is... but I had a look at the article on Boris Becker which even mentions the place,and the date he had a physical relationship with model Angela Ermakova (1999...in a London Restauraunt..after a Wimbledon Tennis Match!!!) +Punk Music is huge in Boise as well as many punk bands, we should add that to the article +", and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by Hi Jerm729! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation BC/BCE in Saul Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. BC vs BCE has been a long debated subject here, without a final answer. All we have now is a compromise one that's been in place for years. Wikipedia has a stated Manual of Style policy on this (WP:ERAS), basically saying either is allowed, but it must be consistent in an article. It states pecifically ""Do not change the established era style in an article"". In this case, unfortunately, Saul is AD/BC, so should not have any CE/BCE dates (except in quotes, links, etc.). Per the policy, it is possible, though rare, for an article to be changed. If you a specific reason for Saul to be changed to CE/BCE throughout, you should bring it up in its talk page as described in the Manual of Style. Until you have consensus for that, we have to follow the general policy. All is good. It's unfortunate you ran into a quirky compromise policy so soon after joining Wikipedia. Given we have the whole English-speaking population as potential editors, things actually run pretty smoothly for the most part. BTW, note there is a British vs. American English compromise in place as well; some articles are in British English, and some in American English, and that's also unlikely to ever change. It's a fun big world we live in! Vandalism Blocking can only be done by an administrator (which I'm not), but you can report it at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. In the case you mentioned, though, there hadn't been any edits made from that IP address for several months. Anselm Happy New Year Jerm729! {| style=""border: 4px solid #FFD700; background- +22:08, 3 February 2014 +She also used her married name, “Mary Maxted”, on the credits of several of her early films. So it wasn’t a name she hid, and in fact virtually every article on her either on the net or in print mentions her birth and married names, so I see no reason why Wikipedia should be denied this important info. Just to give two further examples here is her BFI page (which lists the birth/married names) http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/individual/2982 And a fansite (ditto these two names) http://afn33-marymillington.blogspot.com/ +You are arbitrarily changing edits that make the text more streamlined and user friendly. Please say if you have a conflict of interest, since you appear to be trying to protect the status quo, NCC and inholders. +Betty ok look your right but 10 year olds don't need parental guidance there older children PG is for young children not old. I mean come man D +Did I ever bring this one to your attention? Our mutual friend about 5 weeks ago: . Regards. +Oik oik! Ur a pig! +Any Reason This Isn't Referenced In Main Fascism Article I noticed that this page isn't linked to from the main Fascism article, any reason why not? +Yes, I got distracted – I'll catch up now. +Well, I like how you edited the comment to remove the attack part but to keep the criticism. I think it's appropriate now. +Christchurch, Dorset Christchurch, Dorset is up for peer review. I cannot do it, as I have been involved. Do you know anyone who would be willing to take a look at it? +- you are duing very good works, good informations, keep up, mastar is well pleesed... +I meant the entire reaction section is stupid, don't know why I added international in there. 175.110.222.144 +I'm starting to get confused. Would Why Not a Duck or whoever sees this please send a message to RexNL and tell him to lift this goddamned fucking block! +The information you provided has next to nothing to do with the question at hand. I read to page 6 of the first site and found nothing to apply to this article. I don't need to be a genius to know that volunteer organizations need to constantly look for new members and try to keep the ones they've got, and that members do drop out during hard economic times. Keep in mind that we're not talking about how much if any money Target is giving to the Boy Scouts in a certain year. +Jehochman, I think the three points you listed (in your initial comment) are valid concerns. But the prevailing arguments in the archives were not trivial (WP:Recentism et cetera). I'll probably cone down on your side, but please engage with the archived arguments, and try to AGF. Thanks.198.228.201.144 +" Another point: the section also states Personnel E-1 to E-3 have no rating and are thus called ""non-rated men"" or ""non-rates;"" however they are broadly classed into one of five groups of junior rates, Seaman (SN), Fireman (FN), Airman (AN), Hospitalman (HN) and Constructionman (CN). First, it almost looks like there is some slight mixing of terms (rate and rating) here. Second, for personnel who are E-1 to E-3, in reference to the ""non-rated"" and ""non-rates"" terms quoted in the text, you might want to add that what is frequently used for those who actually do not have a rating (usually because they failed out of their school) is the term ""undesignated"" which is used, for example, as ""undesignated seaman"" or ""undesignated fireman apprentice"", etc. — " +you really don't get it do you, it not one or the other, it's either or, both exist both are enforceable common law hasn't been removed from the face of the earth you know... it is the law of the land in England which the queen swore to uphold in here coronation oath and police swear to uphold in there oath of office. Just because we enshrine things into statute law for ease of administration does not mean we got rid off common law... please get a brain and make sure it is turned on94.168.204.89 +whether you are sandy or abhishek(which is only the same person)..there is lot of improvement is going on already..you are intentionally tagging again n again..if you are really worried about this article truth n cleanup..then do some efforts in adding truthful facts with citations rather than tagging n distorting the article. +" Stats question Re. User:WereSpielChequers/RFA by month - I'd like to estimate how many admins are there, active, that became admin 6 years ago? (Lets say, prior to start of 2005) I'm not quite sure I am reading the tables right. I'm interested, due to the ongoing discussions at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Time limits on adminship - and I suspect you might be able to give me a fair estimate, much quicker than I could figure it out myself. I'm wondering, if we decided to force admins >6 years to re-run, how many that would affect? It would also help to know how many more it would likely affect, next year - ie how many active admins passed in 2006. Is that 221? Or am I reading it wrong? Cheers,  ►  " +Bollinger edit Q Agne, I'd like to open a discussion about improving the lead for the Wiki Bollinger page. You removed some of the detail from the lead quite a while ago. []. I think some of the detail should be added back, in the interest of having the most useful article. I'll open the discussion on the Bollinger discussion page. +awww is someone still living in the hills of high school baby +(((((((( +Bindrunes? Colons? Should this article have a section regarding the runic usage of colons? For example, OFTEN:RUNIC:INSCRIPTIONS:APPEAR:LIKE:THIS: on rune stones, plus the colon practice has even survived to this day in some Germanic countries, where sometimes you will find words framed with colons in a similar way. What about bindrunes? Maybe bindrunes deserve their own article, or perhaps not, but it'd be good to see a complete history of the bindrunes. I know that they were also used during the middle ages, as well as commonly as bomarke which later spread to Portugal, as someone mentioned here. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Scarlett Johansson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +You need to mind your own business about aileen wuornos. I am only putting the truth down. Not my fault you have a vendetta against her. . +" I don't condone insulting america, even if what htey say is true, just for our benefit. Canada's cities suffer from many of the same issues as most large american cities (Pollution, traffic, crime, unemployment, homelessness), and we can't and should not say ""ha ha! we're better than you because we don't have , and you do!"", since most cities have them. I don't try to bash my city or say it's a bad place, and contrary to how i feel, the city actually HAS been getting better in recent years (2003-now), despite crime rates increasing somewhat. Homelessness is down slightly, violent crime was down right up until our first-ever cop killing... our main problems are unemployment and petty theft/small crimes like robbery. our rape level is low, as is our murder rape. Windsor's main issues for crime are assaults, threats, and burglary/ Break-And-Enter (B&E;). Now, one might get confused when they say ""but coonfox, you just said it has the highest crime rate!"" True, we do per capita. We have more Break-And-Enters and convenience store robberies than any other city in canada when adjusted to population. Overall, though, Toronto, Ontario and Metro Detroit still beat us, since they have around 4 million people each (20x our population). And yes, only Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec/Val-d'Or, Quebec (#1) and Sudbury, Ontario (#2) beat windsor for unemployment. Times are tough for everyone right now. That's just my $C0.02. " +" I'd be opposed to putting this forward as a GA at this time. I don't think it will ever get GA status because it's controversial, but also at the moment because it's not that well written in places. As for the image site, there's no problem with it; we're allowed to use SHAC sites in an article about SHAC, but in any event the website hosting it is not the issue. See WP:V. Is the Fred Burton article published in a widely available publication, and who is Fred Burton? I can't find it on the link you gave. (talk) " +" I love that one. First we state the women require time and money. Women = Time * Money And everyone knows that ""time is money"". Time = Money So line one can be restated as: Women = Time * Time Women = Time^2 We also know that money is ""the root of all evil"" So line 4 means Women = Evil Q.E.D. " +YOU ARE A FUCKING BITCH!!BITCH!!!! +Air Florida Flight 90 I don't feel it belongs on a list of MIA incidents. The flight didn't originate in Miami or was destined for the airport. Its only connection to that air disaster is the plane previously flew up to DC from Miami. I don't feel that is sufficient to make it a MIA incident.William +" Kobe Tai A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kobe Tai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Kobe Tai. '''''' *What's YOUR point? " +Just to oficially state I did not start editing until this year. It is quite clear this admin works for Nicola Roxon or is being the mouthpiece of her. Sad really, how labor works. I have sent a number of emails to the Jewish groups who wrote those sources. They will return to get rid of the labour bias and bullying. It is like the communists, either agree or get killed off. GARYGAZZA +"::::In 1917, Lord Curzon, a British cabinet member, as part of deliberations on what would be knows as Balfour Declaration, wrote a memorandum expressing concern about what would become of the Arab inhabitants of Palestine who had ""occupied the country for the best part of 1,500 years"" and would ""not be content either to be expropriated for Jewish immigrants, or to act merely as hewers of wood and drawers of water to the latter."" [1][neutrality is disputed][citation needed] British cabinet approved the Balfour Declaration, which stated the government support for the ""establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people [with the understanding that] nothing shall be done to prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine"".[1][2] The League of Nations reaffirmed this commitment in 1922 by establishing the Mandate of Palestine with the prerogative to carry out the Balfour Declaration.[3] Neither partition nor statehood was mentioned as the means of accomplishing the National Home. " +Checkuser Hey wassup, thanks for the heads up. Too bad the other account was too old to check, but I may have found a way around this problem: User talk:86.81.145.23 check the first revision of that page. So perhaps this can be checked against the newer accounts? +Ah What? You gotta girlfriend? The pedophile apologizer has a girlfriend now? Does she share your view on kids? Please, please promise the world one thing. You won't have any children please, will you?! 18:44, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) +" A barnstar for you! The Civility Barnstar Well deserved, may you have a happy editing career. talk " +Can I add that it seems ridiculous that I receive an indefinite block for choosing a name which one person believes does not meet Wikipedia's standards - even though I think I have shown it does, when people who purposefully vandalise Wikipedia get blocked for a few days or a week. +" A few notes on assembling a DYK queue Thanks for all your work assembling these queues but may I suggest that you review the list of ""unwritten"" rules for these? Among other things, they advise that each queue should be roughly half biographical hooks, roughly half U.S.-related hooks, and should end with a funny or quirky hook to ""leave 'em laughing"". I know this makes putting a well-balanced queue that much harder but it's how it's done, I'm told, for the best interests of the reader. - " +Stop Warning me You can't vandalize the sandbox noobarino +where is the citation for this. Iran does not have ICBMs. this is fud +Response. As far as I'm concerned theres a line between vandalism and improper procedure GhettoDaxx +Garland Insurance Agency Are you trying to delete Garland Insurance Agency +"AWT comment! Meow! Ever thought about ""Soviet Jews"" phenomenum? Many Jews, who documentally were stated as Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, esc. were of Jewish origin, just mentioned in docs as Slavics to escape Soviet-anti-Semitic persecutions... Real Russian people were killed only as ""rivals"", because of _war_ and not the _holocaust_! P.S. For homosexuals killing, mentioned above - I would have killed them all if had a chance! Really, killing homosexuals is not a sin, according to Bible. AND, homosexuality was widely spread in 20'th century Germany, so i doubt they were really persecuted... Hitler stated himself that that were Jews', who dont'let Germany win the First War, and all other casaulties were mostly accidental... And, of course Soviets, who protected their counry agains the invaders were regular victims of WAR, not the HOLOCAUST itself. 2006-January-27 " +":::::You can't know ahead of time what people believe to be the mainstream/straightforward view, and in fact people may not believe it either way, they just accept what they have been told (but we should not simply regurgitate that). I am not advocating rewriting the intro, I am advocating caveatting or balancing. How is ""ostensibly"" inaccurate? Given that we agree to disagree on this (and likely many other points) I will add {npov} to the article soon unless you come up with something new. T " +shit vanessa your so cute +" nai caste ka veer fuck you all motherfuckers pakistani janjua muslims you pigs either lock this talk page too or unlock the talk page of my caste ""i am become death, the destroyer of pakistani muslims"" , note my ip and locate me and send terrorists to kill me......if you are a true muslim i have lost the fear of death fuck you pig 'sitush', you born out of shit of a pig.. teri ma chodu behnchod musalman janjue rajput bhaag behnchod" +" Having both there also helps narrow down the meaning of ""expedition"". Perhaps a change in preposition to something other than ""to"" is the missing ingredient that would make a better title? How about Polish expedition against Kiev, maybe with dates or some other method of narrowing it down? In any case, that's another reason to oppose it; the ""expedition"" should be lowercase, since ""Polish Expedition"" isn't really a proper name used by anybody. " +" Your edits to Washington, D.C. Hi. Thank you for the good faith improvements made to Washington, D.C.. However, the changes have been mostly reverted for the following reasons: All new information must have sources that correspond with WP:CITE. Per WP:SUMMARY, the main article on Washington, D.C. provides only a summary of information and does not go into very many specifics, unless it is considered to be a ""major"" aspect of the city. Since hurricanes and noreasters are rare, they are only mentioned in passing. In our efforts to maintain Washington D.C.'s Featured Article status, the editors typically revert edits that would expand the information beyond what is required by WP:SUMMARY. Along these lines, storms that have hit D.C. are not mentioned because A) there is already a subpage on the subject (List of Maryland and Washington, D.C. hurricanes (1980–present)) and B) since we can't mention every storm, we mention none of them. It is also the reason ""noreasters"" aren't defined in detail, because there is already an article devoted to them, which users can read to find more information. The article is on Washington, D.C. itself, not the surrounding area. Therefore, any information about what happens in the suburbs or the nearby coastal areas is not included in this article. If you have any sources with information that you believe is absolutely necessary for understanding D.C.'s climate, please make it known. Best, " +" Article rating I placed the article as having a top rating since the tongue is a significant landmark in dentistry and greatly influences the location of teeth by providing a force to antagonize lip and cheek muscles. Also, I based my B-class rating of the article because of the large amount of information, but lack of in-line references and no section on diseases commonly affecting the tongue. - talk " +imho, yes. I'll move it there and try and protect it against further moves. 7 July 2005 12:57 (UTC) +Consider it done Actually my pc is caught up with severe virus attack and makes me kind of lazy. My preparation to get a to university is also bothering a little bit. Anyway, I will take initiatives to comply what you've asked for. Not sure about the deadline though, but I'll do them ASAP. Take my hearthest regards +" Hi Bobert60000, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. " +is there NO ONE of authority on Wiki? WHY have what 7 years of article ownership gone unnoticed by any authority figure. History shows numerous warnings, but after time, ............he's back! This article proves why WIKI is a jokethe all knowing +Slight Answer Whenever somebody makes an edit on your talk page other than you, that message comes up, even if only one character was changed. And yes, go to WP:CDVF. +Rapsody That's fine and all but... The original text has no source and is false............... +To put it another way, even though the rates of murder and other violent crime are quite low, but when something does happen (Snowtown, the Beaumont kids, etc) it tends to be grisly and creative enough to get media attention. Our murderers embody a spirit often heard among the city's prouder residents: we're fewer in number but that much more artistic, classier even, than the rest of the country. p .K. 13:15, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) +lol wtf= How do they make them?? how did they lift the stones?? hahaha if you can't explain it, or find a source that has a REALISTIC or REPEATABLE explanation/example, then please put this in the paranormal section. i'd like to see how they made that massive megalith in lebanon that is over 10,000 years old.. +Plot summary? Shouldn't someone, y'know...put up a summary of what happens in the film? I don't feel like seeing it myself... +since you were the only registered user supporting Version 1???? wow after this so called poll being open for less an hour where it is now night time in Europe. You love your spin. Funny thing is under the wording of the picture in Version 1, it is your own words. Also Kogan is not well known as the likes of Hitler and Stalin. When one regards the number of his victims, he surely deserves to be placed in their company as among the worst mass-murderers in history But anyways... enjoy your bias poll, it is a pity I lack your communist propaganda writing style +Why are you putting these comments here? Why don't you add them to the administrator's noticeboard? +" , the Consensus is not ""removing the edit"", it is just the opposite:""protecting the edit"" 15.10.2014:07.43: I added Arbitration Committee's decision ""The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction"" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind) 15.10.2014:07.48: Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus. ........ 15.10.2014:07.47: also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that ""edit-war against consensus. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) "". But, distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material! 14.10.2014; 20.16: (my first edit) after my first edit 14.10.2014:20.30: an unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically on the pretext that ""This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear."". 14.10.2014, 21.08: I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court. 14.10.2014:21.42: Wikipedian Alexikoua reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism. (edit summary of Alexikoua: ""rv essential part removal""). Alexikoua is a Hellen, but neutral like me. 15.10.2014:00.37: This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that Alexikoua opposes to be removed besides me. 15.10.2014:00.38: Wikipedian MelbourneStar reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit. 15.10.2014:00.58: This time, appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]]. 15.10.2014:05.23: Arbitration Committee rejected This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above. The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under these discretionary sanctions. So unless I've missed something, this case is not currently actionable. (talk) Agreed. Cyprus is not part of the Balkans and therefore not covered by the WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanctions. Closing as not actionable. 15.10.2014:07.45: I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users (Alexikoua,MelbourneStar). 15.10.2014:07.47: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff;=next&oldid;=629683076 Dr.K. reverte +" Oppose - Always the same opponents, always the same conversations. The people have a name and don't need godfathers ašo " +is usless because we can sti.lll hack in, but yet +Well, a friendly advise by an administrator usually ends up with not so friendly block ) So, I guess I need to follow. Yet I do sense a hate here. nazis did not ask for a reliable source to prove somebody is Jew, when they murdered 6 millions innocent women, children and elderly. Anyway... +" Let's discuss it " +"I believe you're incorrect, Jossi. The English language definition of ""secret"" includes ""confidential"" as a synonym of ""secret."" This is a matter of semantics, but the meaning is the quite the same, especially in this context. Please peruse and compare Dictionary dot com definition of ""secret, dictionary dot com's thesaurus, and Dictionary dot com definition of ""confidential,"" and Dictionary dot com thesaurus ""confidential. Maharaji's required promise statement confirms what the scholars say. I don't believe this should be a matter of contention because it's really the truth and I don't believe there is a negative connotation to it, either. The scholars confirm the truth of the matter. My sentence revision should stand, imo. Cynthia " +Arvanites are as ethnic Albanians as the Britons are ethnic British. The Albanian posistion is contradictory to also most every wikipedia ethnic article. +Shrimp + bawbie = good times Let's throw some more shrimp on the bawbie! +I was in the process of adding something USEFUL to the Auschwitz concentration camp article so Jawohl, mein Führer popped into my head. I try to add USEFUL things. Anorexia nervosa isn't a joke people die from it that article blows, it contains no relevant information and its just taking up the first spot in the search results. Wikipedia has a few million articles on it maybe you should latch onto one that doesn't concern something that people die from like maybe The Brady Bunch or Mister Rogers Neighborhood because in a 1994 double blind random controlled study Mister Rogers was rated safe, although other studies say more studies are necessary. +style Hello, Your article on the Hydrospace was proposed for deletion today. I got rid of that, but you might want to consider writing in a more formal tone. Also some kinds of information are banned on Wikipedia including contact info current retail prices personal judgments or opinions Although you did nothing wrong, many people here will reflexively erase/revert your entire contributions rather than edit your work. Taking a look at the wikipedia:Manual of Style might save some frustration later. Have fun! +" Very good point, most of these so called ""papers"" from last century are basically worthless because they are so out of touch with today's computing environment. I find the examples from the ""forbidden website"" most interesting because of the resolution and color depth are much closer to what is actually be used these days. " +Requested move Edwin B. Winans (politician) → – Please make this move so that Gov. Edwin B. Winans' article will be returned to where it once was before an unnecessary and disruptive move was made to this page. The move caused many links to stop working, since the person who made that move failed to clean up behind himself. +=WHY DO YOU HORDE DIAMONDS AND JEWLRY WHILE 1 BILLION CHILDREN STARVE TO DEATH? Jewish Devils own all the world's banks, yet donate ZERO percent to charity +Colour of handball Can you please post the most common handball colour here Thanks ( ) +Lacking sources This reads like a somewhat outdated prospectus and is substantially lacking the proper references to sources other than the department itself. +@KWW Show me ONE reliable source that says Jay Sean's parents are Indian. I would be greatful;) +Indeed. It's a serious accusation to make of an editor who I can't see has reverted once on that article. - +" The Residences of College Park buildings will be ""physically attached"" to College Park, in the sense that there will be indoor access to the shopping centre. Seems to me that it's reasonable to include some mention of them in this article, given that they are called ""College Park"" and someone might wonder about them, even if it's just to the extent of ""new condominium buildings on the Bay Street side of the block are called Residences of College Park"", although they are in substantive ways not related to the original building"", etc" +Batley Bulldogs|size=16}} [[Template:Batley Bulldogs squad +Hmmm, am I a reincarnation of Gidonb? Here and here your name is recently mentioned. I think I am fighting now a lost battle, but it tells a lot that after you left the Dutch Wikipedia a couple of years ago, your spirit is still alive!! -) I agree with your analyses above. Although for almost over a year, he didn't change the article: just recently adding his pov, which prompted me to correct it and start a discussion. So my opinion you never know what impact your edits can have -) Hmmm, on a more positive note then. I think I am following again in your footsteps since I have changed nl:Portaal:Jodendom portal after years of neglect. Unfortunately zero feedback, I personally think it's an improvement, but since it was almost unchanged since you started it, I thought you might appreciate it that I actually did something with the portal. I also started yiddish acticles like nl:Hoteldebotel, nl:Koefnoen (uitdrukking), nl:Tacheles, nl:Gannef and I have created and am working on nl:Categorie:Jiddisch, by adding new articles and I am planning on starting a portal as well. As for other jewish topics, I find it hard that like nl:Sjabbatkaarsen, nl:Jitschak Abarbanel, nl:Israël in de Davis Cup or nl:Jiddisch van A tot Z and many others there is no input from others whatsoever. Maybe that's the key difference with the English Wikipedia, there are many more people here that are contributing on these topics. I hope to become more active here as well, probabely in a month orso. Kol tuv! +Is there any evidence the Animation Director made any such comments? I'm at least able to find cached Google pages of excerpts of an alleged fan translation the alleged Morosawa interview along with dead links to the fan translations. I can't find that much 'information' for the Animation Director comments. +It's been a few days and there has not been any objections. Page moved. +Pagan Christ I'd like to propose a section on the criticism that Christianity is largely unoriginal, and is an amalgam of pagan sun-worship religions. For example, note the similarities with Mithraism. +"Hi, could you please provide sources for the changes you made to Christian Bale and Ron Perlman? I've removed the two rumoured roles for now, but you can always re-add them as long as you cite a source. Check out WP:V and WP:CITE for more information on why this is important. Thanks! (talk) (e-mail) " +I feel your pain It is very frustrating. I don't know believe there will ever be a solution. It is an ancient legacy. 01:32, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) +" Please see New News. The confession of Ray Lanphere is a physical document that was witnessed by Chicago Tribune reporter Edward Bechly the first week of January 1910. This document likely still exists in archives or the case file, and should be used as a reference. On page 16 of Mr. Bechly's narrative ""Lanphere's Confession"" is a summary of what he read; ""In the confession, Lanphere said that he had killed Mrs. Gunness and children with an axe, sprinkled the bodies with kerosene and set fire to them and the house. It gave details of the slaying, and told of his part in the former murders which occurred at the Gunness farm, his task usually being the burying of the bodies in the garden. The essential fact, however, was that the murderess was not alive as a fugitive"". " +Um, that's because it is a long game. +":::: ""Dominion"" was not used to to indicate ""semi-independent self-governing territory under the British Crown"". In 1867, it was used to refer to any colony subservient to the British Crown and Parliament. The word Dominon was used to uphold that Monarchical principle. " +U mean the ORLD in World? It says it was reccently deleted?!!! +":When asked in a Daily Telegraph interview in February 2005 if he had ambitions for further public office, he said: ""Ambitions, no. Plans, no. But who knows what the future holds? Run for office? Absolutely not."" " +" Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. TalkCs " +" Well we also have the fairusenoalternative and fairusereplace tags which would be good to get using... Also, all the boiler plate justification tags should have a ""fair use in"" field. We should require a seperate justification for each instance of use, then use a robot to detect extra links. Half is probably correct but still pretty ambitious, as there remain 133,767 fair use tagged images.... and that isn't even considering the additional 100k (my estimation based on random sampling) mistagged as something not fair use. I've gotten about 19,000 deleted so far, but just that small amount has caught me so much flak... " +" Unfortunaately, I don't know of such books. By the way, the Guardian quite was brought up in the original deleteion discussion but was disregarded, though the Guardian is a significant British newspaper. It might be releavent to mention that this Mr. yellow Up seems to have a consistent policy of hounding me and trying to get rid of whatever I write which does not fit his political opinions, he does it also in the Hebrew Wikipedia. There are some more points which I thought of. The argument of Yellow Up that ""This is just one of thousands of trials against military evaders"" which was rpeated by Danntm ""just a simple, unimportant court-martial"" is factually not true. It is very exceptional for the IDF to grant a political objector a full court martial where he can be defended by a lawyer and call witnesses (and make political speeches). It does not happen more often than once in a decade. The usual procedure is ""disciplinary proceedings"" where you are judged by a commaning officer in his bureau, with no lawyer or witnesses, and it lasts about five minutes - but the officer can only give a maximum of 28 days, unlike the full court martial which can give years. But the descision to have a full court martial is far from routine, it is taken on the highest levels. Then there is the fact that the act which the trial was about - a soldier writing ""subversive"" graffiti of 117 tanks and other military vehicles - is far from routine, it is certainly unique in Israel and I think quite exeptional for armies worldwide. And finally, Majorly jusitifed the decision to delete by stating ""The vast majority were delete comments, and there seemed to be consensus to delete"" . Now, I took a look at the deletion log of article submitted on January 8 together with mine . As far as I could see, virtually all of those which were fianlly deleted had a real ovewhelming majoroity in favor, many of them complete unanimity. The court martial artcile had nine in favor of deletion against five opposing deletion (if you don't count my own objection, with it there would be nine to six). I saw that another article which was put up for deleteion in nearly the same time Arnie_Ginsburg, the result was ""no concensus, default keep"". []. I have a feeling this could have been the resut also with the Court Martial article. I don't know if I should try myself to put up all these arguments, it seems like a person trying to defend his own work is discounted.Adam Keller " +by erasing half the criticism or making it get lost is a mishmash of reviews +" I can answer that question for you. From 1902-1911, he worked with Freud, and was indeed at that time known as a ""psychoanalyst"". Adler broke from Freud in 1911, and initially called his work ""free psychoanalysis"", but later called it ""Individual Psychology"". Although to a general lay public, Freud, Jung and Adler are often seen as the ""Big Three"" of psychoanalysis, in the strict sense, only Freud was a psychoanalyst. Jung was an analytical psychologist and Adler an individual psychologist. Use of these alternative terms helps to clarify how both Jung and Adler broke from Freud and developed their own schools of therapy. " +" Vandalization i am NOT vandalizing pages. I am trying to plead my case, but since you wield some ammount of ""power"" you can do whatever you want. Wow, tough guy " +Pop songs Why don't Destiny's Child's singles have pop in the genre? Survivor is a very poppy album and does not have pop in the genre. +" Are you sure you know what the word ""anyone"" means? As in ""anyone can edit""? Perhaps the meaning is lost when it is translated into Korean. 173.206.232.39 " +I did not say it can't go live. It can go now, actually. What I am afraid of is if it would, if not speedy, be passed to WP:AFD. Certain criteria have to be met. I know you have read them, but sometimes not all companies/websites can have articles here in Wikipedia. Just try to make it live. +I have taken the time to fix what i believe you think is wrong !! +" In regards to the UK title, should a redirect not be set up for ""Avengers Assemble"" / ""The Avengers Assemble""? Currently those will both take you to the Avengers(Comics) article. Failing a redirect, perhaps a disambiguation page or a note at the top of the comics article directing people for the film here. No doubt this will become an issue once the film is released in the UK and less informed users not knowing the original film title. 194.66.175.71 " +" Sixteenth Ammendment Hi. The reason I changed this is because I searched for ""16th ammendment"" and did not find the article. I believe that I saw the 25th ammendment article written as the number, not spelled out, as well as one other ammendment. I think it makes more sense for all of those articles of be titles with the number, rather than spelled out. People usually do not write by spelling out the word if it is a number. Sorry if I changed that one, while leaving the other ones the same. If it is changed back, I won't change it back. I just thought it was a better title. Thanks for the message! " +YOu have been blocked for threee hours. Farmbrough. +" Miscellany Do we really need a miscellany section here ? I don't think information about previous confrontations is relevant in this article. 009 " +Request an unblock? Hardly. Were you listening to The Dude's story? +what is so unnoteworthy??? three major concerts seem pretty noteworthy in my opinion since its the only other major non baseball events that have been hosted in the stadium. +Youndbuckerz's edit to the lead section This edit by +You're way too nice, it gets me uncomfortable. I will get back to you on all the articles I will be nominating. +PBI PBI no longer exist in Sturgeon Bat. The shipyard closed in 1996, and thier offices on 3rd are now vacant and the building is for sale. +I did never edit-war at all to include this information either. +As you should be aware from the fact that every proposed inclusion was rejected by everyone else who discussed any of them, not a single one is supported by consensus. Why don't you make any effort whatsoever to demonstrate that any consensus supported any of the edits? Just one? Hell, I can't even think of a single editor that agreed with any of your inclusions or proposed inclusions. (talk) (contribs) +Jews have the right to expel Arab invaders from their homeland. Those who believe Jewish ancestral land belongs to these Arab invaders are typical Nazi propagandists. +Remember why you are here! +" ==Scenes of a Sexual Nature== Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Scenes of a Sexual Nature, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.theworkslimited.com/index2.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Scenes of a Sexual Nature. Then you should do one of the following: Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Scenes of a Sexual Nature where we can find that note; or Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL. It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! talk to me " +It is no use pretending the Wikipedia is anything but a dishonest enterprise. It is simply not any kind of encyclopaedia, as it is controlled by administrators who use censorship to impose their own biassed agenda. +Wow, MilborneOne, never found that page. (O.O) I will read up and post my argument for in there. Thanks - +Lead The last sentence of the third paragraph is quite long and complex grammatically. Perhaps it could be rewritten or broken into multiple sentence to aid readability. +Beijing-Taipei Expressway Does anyone find this proposal worthy of attention on the article? I don't think this Xinhua article is the first mention of the idea...I could have sworn I'd seen it mentioned on Wikipedia. +Arbitration on Dominion issue I've made an arbitration case on the nagging Dominion issue on Canada and related pages. There might be a need for you to comment. Thanks. +Why Is Pot Illegal? Pot is illegal because William Randolf Herst ran a smear campain in the 1930's to protect his intrests in the timber industry because hemp was poised to replace wood as an inexpensive raw material for the manufactorers of paper. Also, it has been proven it does much less damage than alchohol. It also reduces the memory loss caused by alzheimers. +" and end in some coy ""I take no pleasure in being correct"" attempt to rub my nose in it." +Thanks for your note regarding the Carsulae Site Plan. I am very happy to upload the image but to be candid, I forget how to do it. Can you instruct? I uploaded the image for you to Commons at commons:Image:Carsulae-siteplan.jpg. I assumed that you wished to release it under the GFDL but if this (or anything else) on that page is incorrect then you can change it. If you've changed your ming and prefer not to upload it then let me know and I'll arrange for it to be removed. Thanks. Cherry blossom tree +The history has now been fixed (mostly), by moving the restored Uig page and recreating the new page Uig (disambiguation) +(p.s: don't worry, I'm not a frustrated 12 yr old.) +I sincerely wish i could meet you chumps You freaks really get my goat. Etaonsh(still stuck in 1940's Europe), Firestar(firststatr Kung Fu extraordinaire), COvenantD(typical east coast jerk), Mibhofroovvsskskkety(russkie man frozen in USSR), Samuel Luo(weird lookin crazy), and crazy ol' Tomanandaaa!(brokeback mt.! u give w.hollywood a bad name!) Hey tom, when are you going to make a real citation? your scholarship is the worse i have ever seen. stay in your hole in the public library, transient! We know you have no lives and are failures, I really can't believe how much you guys are on this site. I have been away for awhile(thanks to some good old censorship courtesy of that advocate of free speech, Fristare, kung fu chump) but you have been here night and day it appears. It's like you are writing books on the Falun Gong page alone. Freaks! Get a life! enjoy the sun, the wind, the air. +f u c k y o u a s u a r e a b i t c h a s s n i g g e r +,The game is coming out Gamestop is absolute proof now lets put the stuff back and noone be gay +DangerousPanda I accept your block but I felt that you blocked me immediately with out even giving an opportunity of being heard that is why I used IP clearly declaring my name instead of socking hiddenly by using new user account. Had i bad faith then why I would have agreed to the User soham edits as a moderator 4 days ago as a matter of WP consensus. Bad faith is very clearly reflected by comments of sock users see last edit on my talk page. Interestingly they are once declaring me producer and once as a pakistani supporting Pakistani lead actor. Is not this biased approach and should such comments and approach be allowed on WP? Again respect and regards. +No. This decision is not democratic and is outside the rules of Wikipedia. You are abusing your powers. I will not abide by your decision. +shut up you cunt WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW +Firstly, I am not responsible for the edits mentioned, so please verify your own facts before launching allegations. Secondly, I respectfully request that you refrain from making any further edits to the population statistics on the Belfast article, as these are the result of my own research within my capacity as Professor of Human Geography at Queens University, Belfast. +" That is a tough one! I guess something like 'EastEnders (5 September 2010)' off the top of my head, but I've just scanned through all 11 archive pages of WT:TV-NC and can't see it covered. Best thing to do might be to drop a message there and ask. Another alternative would be 'EastEnders' (episode 1234)' but given the problems with consistent numbering, the airdate is probably the better option unless we can be 100% sure about the episode no. Why, are you planning on writing one? D Frickative " +"OK, citations are still needed in the history section of Dal Lake though... White cat " +Battle of Jamrud They are still editwarring. And accusations of sockpuppetry are being made on the talk page. I'm not seeing any edit warring, and there clearly is some sockpuppetry going on (I'm pretty sure that the latest round of edit warring before I protected the article included an editor who'd logged out in an attempt to not be identified and sanctioned for this; I don't have a clue who this was though). +REDIRECT Talk:Mario's fifth studio album +Number 57, I am not a football fan so I am not aware of the context of the use of the other flags, so I cannot judge on there use here, I will leave that to editors that know more on the subject, but in the case of the Ulster Banner it is not correct to use it in this case, if the same applies to the other flags then I would support their removal. +Sorry, but I strongly disagree. Wikipedia would not be a place I'd like to be if I had to censor myself or see others censored in matters of this kind. I've been involved with moderating difficult nationally motivated POV disputes in Wikipedia a lot, and outside of it for a much longer time too, so I think I know what I'm talking about. I couldn't do what I do if I wasn't allowed to call a spade a spade. (T.|@) +Let's see what neutral viewers such as Dab, Rudra, Abcedere and Buddipriya have to say. They are fair-minded. If they think this Globe and Mail commentary is inappropriate, I may concede. +" I'm confused here, too. So far, I've only added one new source today - so I don't know what that means. I guess I'm confused about the new info doesn't concern men's rights. If men are less likely to have to pay alimony in Nordic countries because it's assumed that divorced spouses don't need to care for one another but there's a high rate of long-standing legal separations in Italy and Latin American countries so that women continue to be supported and retain inheritance rights, how is that not related to men's rights? I think we're back again to getting a problem statement rolling - with definition of what is meant by ""men's rights"" to help guide me and others (it would be so great to have help!) fix this article. I put in the men's rights definitions as a starting point and hoped for refinement by others. " +I think you misunderstood Wikidemon, who said, I think both of them [von Spakovsky and Dorf] make a lot of sense, and likely represent the majority opinion in the legal / academic community on how a court is likely to rule. ... In other cases I might disagree that a couple particular quotes are on target. These two, I happen to agree with. Including both of them is supported by consensus, and WD is part of our consensus, which is why I'm reverting your removal of von Spakovsky immediately, Xeno. ACORN employees across the country have been indicted and convicted for voter registration fraud. The House bill specifies organizations involved in election-related scandals as targets of defunding. For these reasons, the commentary of a former FEC member like von Spakovsky is very valuable. This is his area of expertise. I don't know why you insist on including a lengthy quote from Kenneth R. Thomas, while erasing any mention of the opinion of a former member of the FEC, but I can guess. Skoal. +Huh? I barely came to this site today. Let me log in, so my edits CAN be tracked97.118.188.17 +THIS. One of the thoughts. +Such a picture could probably be taken from the ferry that runs between Oakland and Alameda and San Francisco. +" We should treat the sentence ""Families, as well as other social groups, generally live permanently in houses."" with suspicion; for it doesn't have a citation! The clown in my wants to add to it.I find the article House excessively American-centric; for in Australia, we live in kangaroo shelters! I shall request the article be moved — not to Simple English, but to Simple-minded English. Happy new year! " +Megistias,I bet you will start a war edited like most of the Greeks here on Wiki do,on Albania,Macedonia or Bulgaria articles etc.That's why you are using those maps Megistias? I have no problem with them but Megistias,Epir it was NOT Greek nor is the north Epir,just two days ago a Arvanitas told me that Epir its not even a greek word!Only the nationalist Greek voices pretend that it is AND if it was, what do u want?, you want the land back? Albanians have houses and lands all way in Athens,does that says that the land is a part of Albania? Stop your nationalist crap and open your eyes,Albanians were and are not the enemy of Greece! There is 800,000 Albanians in Greece almost a milion is that the reason why you hate Albania? +"Did you manage to read that ""refutation""? I did - and it essentially says that Boas never actually meant to postulate primate of nurture over nature - it is by pure accident that all around misunderstood him in that way. So much for ""refutation"". But apparently it is ""antisemitism"" to criticize such a ""great"" Jewish ethnic activist, isn't it? Anon 27 April 2010. " +Protest for deleting arbitrary the talks Your actions speak for it self , you delete what you do not like or do not suit you, you can not write and manage an article on base of lies, claiming Greek what is not and writing the history not in the way it is, but in the way suits you and the interest that you protect. I demand that you have to show respect not only for my work but also for the work of the others that contribution as well.. Maybe you need to go in periphery of Athens more often and hear some Illyrian language that you know very well. Dodona +Is this related to Brauer's theorem on induced characters? +" WPF1 Newsletter (January) (talk) " +redirects Women's Soccer, LLC , Women's Soccer LLC , Womens Soccer, LLC , Womens Soccer LLC , Womens' Soccer, LLC , Womens' Soccer LLC should redirect here. 70.51.11.210 +Renaming for Queen Elizabeth According to this article, the tower will almost certainly be renamed soon in honor of Queen Elizabeth's diamond jubilee. +You. You're such a sad person, the fact you FAILED RfA makes me LAUGH! I hope you get raped & murdered and you rot in hell you CUNT! +Look at the articles you have created. Michael Wardian?? Bob Glover?? WHO CARES. Let me see how much talent does it take to run> Hmm, first I move my left foot, then my right foot. WOW! And imagine a guy actually wrote a book about it!! If you think James Hunter (film director) should be deleted, then do us all a favor and delete those losers as well. Thanks. +The forums suck now Criticisms of the forums should be included, since the forums suck now, because of all the dicksucking. but, uh, there should be a non-vulgar version of this in the article. OH SHIT I'M GONNA GET BANNED NOW I SHOULD NOT MENTION I AM EURO NONYMOUS WHO WAS LOVD UNTIL LOW TAX SAID HE SUCKED THEN HE WAS HATED +The Google search? No. It's not a reliable source, and comes more under the heading of original research. There are articles which use Google hits, frequency of Google searches, etc. to prove a point, but never as the sole source for something's notability. I don't think I can help you. I did do a Factiva search yesterday evening and came up with nothing. Whatever the Serbian editors say, highly-popular political songs do get newspaper coverage outside their country if they really are that notable, even if they're in a foreign language. Der Steuersong, for example, a satirical German song about ex-Chancellor Schröder (in German, with lots of untranslatable German puns), turns up 67 hits on Factiva. Germany may be richer, but then we were at war with Serbia, so I really do believe that someone would have taken notice if the song's notability was as high as is claimed. (talk) +Your Type-Os You didnt like my comments on your type? Dont be a cry baby, ok? You breakin mah hard hat. +user Dr.K article mark duggan vandalism hello he is vandalising, edit warring, violating 3rr and generally being a nuisence on the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Mark_Duggan could you look into it +is the computer geek +User:86.156.159.51 I have welcomed this user, a user who edited your user page. +Merge discussion? Where was a merge discussion on this page ever held? I don't see one here... +"Welcome, ! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions! You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself. You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log. I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum. I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions. - at " +" As i said in your talk page i have no intentions of violating 3RR the only thing that is bothering me is that the user black yoshi says only american air dates can be added. In addition, since this is an American show, “only American airdates” should be listed here. i have hiughlighted the bit ina quite for you to see the post above says it. ive no problem wiht waiting just thought since i had the information i should add it (talk - contrib) " +" Quality issues The article definitely deserves it ""B-class"" status. It is poorly organized and the quality of English at some places is poor. Where are the Telugu scholars and PhDs? Maybe someone should ask professors from Government universities to contribute to wikipedia - they do have a lot of time on their hands. Unfortunately, I do not have enough knowledge in this area to edit what has been written. I have removed some (rather poorly written) sections which contained redundant information (on Telugu for example-there is a page for the language and related issues)." +" Bhtbby fhy Why do you help that 13 year old she's too young to understand wikipedia she should be kicked off —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.139.43 " +Clean up I've tried to tackle the issue of no citations and improve the article. I'm sure there must be more to add about Norton. Libby norman +It's Go Go Jewranger Go Go Jewranger Harrasing Children Having 41 year old gay sex Go Go Jewranger Go Go Jewranger He's an otunka wannabe He gets pipi hurt What a Jewranger Hates ed bullshit Go Go Jewranger! YOU'RE NOT ASIAN GO....GO.......JEWRANGER!!! +The Gospels are Faith-based documents devoid of all historical provenance and articles like this on Wikipedia can noly be written by Roman Catholic Fundamentalists wishing to use Wikipedia as an indirect channel of Christian evangelism. +REDIRECT Talk:Third man argument +. All that effort was wasted. (People who ask a question and then come back to read the answer are also not going to be able to find it) +Hi This sunday on your show you had a black fellow in white he had a watch on his wrist it was glod looking, what kind of watch did he have?????? BILL NOTTO +especially in the light of how they treated me and my factually correct edits +WHY DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE DO YOU HAVE MENTAL ISSUES YOU COW? +" Piece of trivia I removed this line that was at the bottom of the article: Takeover was mashed up along with Rihanna's ""Hard"" and Rage Against The Machines' ""Bulls On Parade"" in the song ""Take The Hard Bulls Over"" by metal remixer bliix. if theres somewhere this belongs, feel free to reincorporate it." +Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Reported for edit warring not using talk page to get consensus about changes on Rick Pitino +A summary of this article needs to be inserted in History of Portugal after the heading Main article The Consolidation of the Monarchy in Portugal (1279-1415). This article needs to have two headings: at top, For previous history, see... And at bottom, For later history, see... No doubt these connections are in the works. 06:10, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) +Aaron and his inheritance Hello Shirulashem I have added to the Aaron descussion board, as you suggested, comments that I consider fair and accurate to add to the article Do you care to comment on how I should proceed and to avoid another humbub? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Aaron +" I have reviewed the article here and placed it on hold. There is just one reference left to be fixed and the whole thing passes. It's just a reference that, according to Checklinks, is about to expire. Once that is fixed, I will pass the article. - • Talk • " +See Etymology section of the article. It should answer all of your concerns as it was written with consensus. +Headline text Headline text PLEASE MAY I BE UNBLOCKED NOW +Is it possible that my IP adress is shared with another person, as I've never seen or seen your page until a few hours before writing this? +Hey, great work on Op Tonga. It's been a good week for Normandy-related articles. In the last three days alone, Operation Luttich passed its ACR (partially thanks to your suggestions and advice), Operation Epsom is at ACR, Operation Totalize passed its GAN, and Op Tonga is now up to an excellent and well-rounded B Class (GAN shouldn't be far off). Excellent work! Esteemed regards, (Chat) +has been granted' for the following reason(s): reasonRequest handled by:'' |} +FUCKER CUNTO I WILL EDIT ALL I LIKE HAAAAHAAAAHAAAHAAA !!!! +Is there any reason why Chowdhury family should be ordered before the family of the founding fathers of the nation Sheikh Mujib family, Shere Bangla Family and Zia Family? Is the Chowdhury family more eminent than either of those families? Please explain. Wikipedia should not be used to serve the interest of any particular individual or family. +OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. OH LAWDY. O +I am going to shoot you in the head and laugh as your brains splatter onto the ground and blood pools around your corpse. I am going to shoot you in the head and laugh as your brains splatter onto the ground and blood pools around your corpse. +whoever is the next person to write on this page has admitted to having aids and fellates aids monkeys non-stop +"The article states Philip Louis, Count Palatine of Neuberg as having married Anne of Cleves, Henry VIII of England's fourth wife; the article on the Count clarifies that he was actually married to Anna (possibly spelled ""Anne"" in German source texts), the niece of the aforementioned Anne of Cleves. This is especially interesting because this article describes the Count's wife as being Catholic, apparently mistaken for her aunt, although her father was Protestant." +Fort Nathan Hale Is Fort Nathan Hale actually part of the CT State Park system? The article says that it's a city park. I'm taking it off. +" Greenman Are you on the Pay Roll of the Dictator Jose Eduardo dos Santos? If now why are you placing the Sao Tome Born Dictator with a clear violation of Wikipedias rules on verifiable content. No one known in ""angola"" where this sun of both Parents of Sao tome Island was born what they know is that he was not born in ""angola"" but apparantly you seem to have seen the unexistant birth certificate of the Dictator. Also it is very suspicious and shows what kind of a individual you are not by not having the balls of placing your real name. The world is a sad and remains more ignorant and misinformed ny individuals such as you. Sincerely and yours truly, etc..., etc.... Rui Gabirro" +" strange situation at the Barak Obama talk page Recently I added a single reliably-sourced word, ""African,"" to the list of Barak Obama's mother's ethnic origins near the beginning of the Barak Obama article. My basic point is that if the article mentions Obama's mother's single Scottish ancestor (who was born 400 years ago), as well as Obama's Irish and Swiss ancestry, then there shouldn't be a problem with an equally-brief mention of her African ancestry. My one-word addition to the article was first modified and then deleted, so I opened a talk page here. The discussion has taken a disturbing turn, and seems to have hit a nerve of racial discomfort among some wikipedia editors. In particular, the suggestion to delete the entire list of ethnic origins as a way to avoid adding the word ""African"" strikes me as a potential public relations black eye for wikipedia, which is why I am making this post here. " +Hate fantasyliterature.net, it sells things and the reviewers are just people who the webmaster thinks writes good reviews. Terrible choice for an external link. IMBD is questionable because his TV and movie work is much less notable than ASOIAF - I'd use it as a ref for his TV work instead. That fantasy fan page just looks like a fan page, and GRRM doesn't seem to have any actual content on the page. I suspect spam actually, whoever added it probably splashed it across a lot of pages. Westeros I don't think is appropriate here either, unless he frequents it. ISFDB and Internet Book List seem redundant, and might be better as references also. Of the lot, I'd probably stick with BWB, perhaps westeros and delete or reference the rest. +East New York, Brooklyn vs. New Lots, Brooklyn STOP REVERTING ME, I KNOW NEW LOTS IS IN EAST NEW YORK, BROOKLYN BUT EAST NEW YORK IS THE ACTUAL NEIGHBORHOOD +and in near directon to NS +And you can simply input the chu nom to get the Han tu using the WinVNKey software, which is free online. It's very easy to use. +" Statistic removal I am removing the statistics from the 4th paragraph for the following reasons: The source [] qualifies as a WP:Primary by definition of a primary source The source is not an original study in and of itself, but is instead a ""meta-study"" based on the ""RCTs"". The underlying RCTs were not random or controlled as I indicated earlier by the Gregory Boyle and George Hill research; my previous posts here linked to their research which is a reliable source. The sentence I'm removing is a an opinion of the researchers themselves and is not directly supported by the results. See []. The actual reduction is not statistically significant. See Statistical_significance. The ""gold standard"" is ~5%. I cannot obtain the source article in question without paying for it, but it really doesn't matter since we're not supposed to be using primary sources directly anyway. Both the monitor.co.ug and the aforementioned research goes to discredit the research Prostitution, when taken into account, nullifies the ""benefits"": [] Additional secondary source finding no benefit of MGM: [] Another secondary source discrediting the research based on non-sexual HIV acquisition. See citations at the following link: [] See citations here; male-female transmission increased: [] Commentary that RCTs were not random at all (this is a fact as participants were paid): [] No relationship between MGM & HIV in Kenya: [] Unlike the primary source in question, I've posted numerous links to reliable sources here. It would be easy to justify removing additional statements based on the source in question, but let's start with this one. " +You need to get consensus before unilaterally whacking something that you just don't happen to like. +Thank You Hey there! =) I just wanted to thank you for welcoming to Wikipedia a while back when I was new here. So, thank you. ^.^ I no longer come to this site, so forgive the newbie entry I made. ShadowFox S.T.A.R.S +"I think the ""split image"" of Richard Desmond arises from the fact that he made his money in pornography (not mainstream publications), and then once having made his money, he used those profits from pornography to try to buy his way into mainstream publishing. I think that can be stated as fact. Now as to whether he did the latter in an attempt to improve his soiled image . . . . well, that's up the reader to form an opinion. " +" It's acceptable to cite a for-pay article. Bear in mind, most books and other print references are for-pay, essentially, too. As for the news schedule, why is it the business of an encyclopedia to have the news schedule of every single television station, especially given that that encyclopedia makes a policy of not recapping TV schedules? - (conspire | past ops) " +" No problem dude, I've just found you as a good admin. Also, in the future, don't waste your time trying to talk with Greenock125/Andy593, or any of his other sockpuppets. You'll waste your own time. I think Greenock125 is a troll and wants to waste your (and others') time, or he is just dumb and don't understand or listen to our advices. /Mid (contributions) " +FUCK OFF YOUR PIECE OF SHIT JEW +Fig search nothing online. +" I'm afraid I will not be restoring your other comment. I am familiar with WP:TALK of course – as I'm sure you are familiar with WP:BLANKING. Before you made that comment, I specifically asked you not to leave further messages on my talkpage unless you were willing to adopt a more collegiate attitude. Your subsequent comment betrayed no change in stance. So I removed it, and I stand by that removal, per policy and per my own sense of right and wrong.I appreciate your offer to unblock me, and hope that you will consider doing so in recognition of the fact that the offending passage is now removed and that I would have done so on request at any time. However, I am resolute that the deleted comment is going to remain deleted. ╟─Tag►inspectorate─╢ " +Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Could you take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for reduction in protection level where there is a request for Operation Midnight Climax. Thanks. , Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq +" The essential point is that the peacockery does more harm than good. We should write in a dispassionate way, otherwise any reasonably savvy reader will think ""hype"" after reading the first few sentences. " +"It might be helpful to develop a ""This article is NOT"" list to allow the existence of a useful nicknames list and prevent scope creep: NOT a list of mottos, slogans, and marketing tags; nearly every city has one or more such ""nickname"". Examples: The Big Apple, Garlic Capital NOT a list of humorous names; nicknames listed here, if once humorous, are common enough to have lost their humorous effect NOT a comprehensive list of variants; the one or two nicknames listed here for a given city are recognized city-wide as ****the standard**** spoken shortcuts for the full city name. - " +Ukrainian architecture Hi, I started a new article , would you like to help? Particularly on many of Odessa constructions and so on. +" Good Article promotion Congratulations! Thanks for all the work you did in making Tammar Wallaby a certified ""Good Article""! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – (talk)" +"I've noticed that a lot of Wiki admins are rude and aggressive towards contributors who do not have ""admin status"" on Wikipedia. So here's a rant backed up by reliable ... " +Ratings Hi Blnguyen. Fair point. I'll make a note to go through the A-class ones again and downgrade them to B. I probably need to understand the criteria better as I didn't take account of any relationship to FA or GA. All the best. | talk page +" sri arlagadda vasu charitable trust sri arlagadda vasu charitable trust HOME In the competitive world the people are busy with their work, employment and they are neglecting their parents in maintaining and looking after their welfare due to which their parents are becoming as baggers and orphans. Due to insufficient earnings, financial problems for educating their children and maintaining their families now a days most of the people are neglecting their elder family members in their old age and they are leaving them in any where as orphans. Daily we are reading the above incidents in News Papers, viewing in News channels and hearing the same. As per one survey 1300 old age people per year are committing suicides in our State. The suicides are increasing year by year. The old age orphans are suffering from poor eyesight, unhealthy hungry, homeless, dumbness and even though they are begging, no body will come forward to help the old age orphans and they are facing unbearable problems and troubles. The old age people are living as orphans and lifeless persons, though they are having their own persons and they are doing begging under the trees, in the bus stands, railway stations, footpaths what we have to do their remaining lives as happiness? What we have to do help and service as human beings?As a dutiful citizens we came forward with our own free will through Sri.Arlagadda Vasu, Charitable Trust to help and do service to the old age orphans with an intention to construct good old age home, to provide residence to the destitute old age persons, to serve food, clothes and supply medicines to them freely under 24 hours supervision and we intend to do their valuable remaining life with happiness until their last breathing by saying courage to them.Since the construction and maintenance of old age home is the financial problem, we intend to collect donations from the donators. We are doing as we like and we pray you to do successful our proposed programme by helping us on humanitarian ground. you deposit donations directly to Union Bank of India A/c.No. 407 5020 100 83609, IFSC – UBI No.540 757 or to send Cheques and D.Ds to Sri Arlagadda Vasu, Charitable Trust, kadapa.www.savctrust.in " +I don't like you ! 77.184.28.171 +" Hi again, In my view it's a good article. But former reviewer has mentioned some problems which you can see here. Thanks(t-c) " +THIS IS MY RELIGION why are your deleteing my information i am giving you guys about my city +The citation supports, so I think it is okay for now. Let's see if it expands over time. +Thanks for the civil explaination, you're probably the least belligerant editor I've crossed at somepoint. I do have an account (User:Eganjt) but I access wikipedia from work and don't bother to log in most of the time. Actually, I've gone ahead and asked that Sinebot not sign for me, and I plan to use the IP address for most of my wikipedia browsing. I like helping out, but the formatting is hard for me to remember, and there seems to be a lot of squabbling between editors. Thanks for explainations, and I'll be sure to keep on helping out, just within the rules! +(note I have deleted an attempt to spam some fringe websites by Vince Barrows. ) +MarxismLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLO +Finally,remember what should be done to this Rajus article will definitely be done.Thank You - +I have yet to see one case of a Rajastani take on the Punjabi Rajas and defeat them. Considering that many a Punjabi Raja has militarily aided many a defeat against you guys historically. Kinda leaves your last extremist poem flat doesn't it? - Raja +Snyder, NY map I'll look into it. (talk) +Take your sandbox And stick it up your asshole retard. +You sir (or madam, or whatever the hell you are), are a gutless vandal who gets sick kicks off vandalizing other users' pages by forcefully deleting their templates. A hypocrite and a vandal is what you are. A plague upon you and upon all those who function like you ! Mark my words, our resistance is far from over ! You have been warned, cur ! - +How can you even be that bias? talk +Gail Kim wwe return You are really starting to piss me off deleting the gail kim returning to wwe information i have put there, and its true, and confirmed, and even put a ref there not stop doing it do you think your tuff keep deleting other ppl true work. +Oh, and if anyone finds any let me know, I'm still struggling to find any decent Christmas presents and an elf would be a great one for the kids. +Two F-22 Raptor in flying.jpg +" Talkback — '''''''''' (have a chat) " +iPads can be confusing. +Notice of RfC and request for participation There is an RfC in which your participation would be greatly appreciated: Talk:Gun_control#RfC:_Remove_Nazi_gun_control_argument.3F Thank you. +" I was misrepresenting nothing. (Of course trying to pull a Sikh riot-Godhra switcharoo didnt work for Hornplease). Hornplease was using partisan ""secular"" sources to discredit Judge Nanavati, from sites that sahouldn't be quoted. Lostintherush made valuable contributions to the article which is why I asked him. Bakatalk " +Klass Ingerson too, in Sweden I think. +Yup Hey yeah it is me... Thanks for the tip! +Just a few minor comments, so I'm putting the article on hold. Drop me a note if you have any questions. +Hello again! Nagyon szviesen. Their lived near Hatzfeld(neben Hatzfeld, Zsombolya mellett).I can send you my family tree. But I think it is not needed, because there was a Nazi leader(who is not my close relative, and I am not a Nazi) whose name was Franz Basch. So I think he wasn't Jewish. I think that Basch is a Swabian name(sváb név), which was taken by some Jews. User:HunTheGoaT 15:28, 23 August 2006 (CEST) Jud You have been warned not to turn disambiguation pages into onomastic pages. They serve different purposes. Please abide by the manual of style. Thank you, (討論) Please create an extra page for people and things not named Jud. You can link to that page, but should not turn a working disambiguation page into something else. (討論) +" His previous run-ins were mentioned on the page that was deleted. There was nothing hidden there. Here are some links: http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/music/2012/07/19/big-band-singer-feels-redemption-hit-red-sox-song/LFTObO5mz3Gr2VPNByukEI/story.html (This article mentions both the Hall of Fame addition, and the fact that the song was licensed by MLB ""The first in the league""). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rlp0a2qSo8 http://www.walb.com/story/20052012/capt-kirk-plays-umpire-in-brian-evans-video http://www.bostonmusicspotlight.com/localspotlight-features-local-singer-brian-evans-records-new-anthem-for-fenway-park-april-2012/ http://fitperez.com/2012-10-19-william-shatner-fenway-music-video-baseball-red-sox Brian also is the opening act for Jay Leno, when Leno performs at The Mirage in Las Vegas - http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Jan-14-Fri-2005/weekly/25644723.html Briefly dated Angelina Jolie: (excerpt from autobiography by Andrew Morton: http://books.google.com/books?id=jYy2laAs_Q8C&pg;=PA309&lpg;=PA309&dq;=%22brian+evans%22+%22Angelina+jolie%22+%22andrew+morton%22&source;=bl&ots;=uPdwvGA9Fo&sig;=IRSoxxUjeY5l9s2IQjZde5491h8&hl;=en&sa;=X&ei;=H87qUJGLFYq70QH7r4GoBw&sqi;=2&ved;=0CHMQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q;=%22brian%20evans%22%20%22Angelina%20jolie%22&f;=false Has released multiple recordings besides ""At Fenway"" - http://www.amazon.com/Brian-Evans/e/B000APFZOQ/digital/ref=ntt_mp3_rdr?_encoding=UTF8&sn;=d Is the son of Helen Bousquet, who has brought national attention to the condition known as ""Sleep Apnea,"" which until her story rarely received any attention (there's also a page on this that I have been working on, which you might be able to additionally assist me in). See www.valleypatriot.com newspaper website, I believe it's on their website. Also, sleepapnea.org ""Unnecessary loss of life"" (something to that effect on it's home page). They are working together, Brian and The American Sleep Apnea Association, to have a bill presented to Congress in her name, so that any patient with sleep apnea must be monitored prior to discharge from a hospital right up until they are indeed discharged. As you can see, none of the above are ""PR Newswire"" or self-released news items. " +Just a minuscule entry to have the page formed. +Bro. S of V. I’m quite willing to bend a few Wiki rules in defence of the Craft. Talk +criteria (from an AfD): When judging based on a borderline publication record, I look not just at the count of publications and of citations, but the journals in which they were published. Judging by the CV, in this case they are basically very good specialized journals, the leading ones but only in narrow fields. There are known in the most widely read and most rigorously refereed biology or science journals: even one of the papers being in Nature or PNAS would have made this a weak keep. If I had to give evidence for that being a good criterion, I learned this from the provost at Princeton, in a talk explaining the criteria he uses. DGG ( talk ) +BTW: The German version de:Feldberg im Schwarzwald is very informative. I don't know about the geological and geographic terms used in that article, so I don't feel able to translate it. Maybe someone else want's to have a look? | Talk 09:30, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC) +" Perhaps. But it's a borderline case, so it's probably best to just keep it as a link. (talk) Perhaps it's best to achieve consensus on this. I think it isn't borderline and it's almost a textbook example of when a fair use claim is appropriate. But then again I'm no lawyer. I'd like to copy our discussion to the talk page and ask for a 3rd opinion (or 4th and so on) on the matter. ॐ puff " +Do you want to play a game? If you follow the rules you won't DIE!!! ... you still might... depending on my mood and if there's any unattended knives around. I'm feeling extra stabby today =) Yours truly, The stabber (you are the stabee). +" Lad, you've been edit warring for more than a decade - as , then now this account. Every time inevitably you exhaust the community's patience, disappear for a bit then come back with a ""clean"" account. When's it going to click that the behavior needs to change not just the account name? For your sake and everyone's take a step back and honestly think about how you interact with people and how it might improve. Cheers. 119.81.31.6 " +"Your change to the page Michael Jackson was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Slgr@ndson ( - messages - contribs) " +":So, they ""did"" you again, холоднокровний ти наш... You're disappointing me Alex. Well, probably there's a good side in this problem: I hope WP helps you to drain your real-life emotions so that you manage your anger while at work. OK, I'll take care of the articles you warned me about. But you should've been thinking about them, and about 3RR, when you were talking (?!) to Irpen... Wishes, . " +March 2008 (UTC) I apologise for being uncivil. 04:36, 19 +I can add more islands. Tell me which ones your want added. Keep in mind that the smallest of the islands are not necessary. I think I included most major ones. Let me know what else you want. ( ). +Incidentally, which part of this edit do you see as adding significant content? (talk) +It appears to me that the accelerating particle is changing its acceleration. This is undesirable without a caption comment to that effect. +kindness Wow, your compassion sure disappered fast didn't it? Like I said, you have no spirit. If you don't have the spirit of an Indian then you may as well be any phony white boy or girl of European ancestry. Stop hiding behind the Indian thing and just be honest. I think Wikipedians have the right to know that you're a cop. Q. And besides, what Indian sister would be a cop for the white boys? A. A traitor. +WikiProject Films January 2009 Newsletter The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! +Thank you very much for opening that discussion, have replied there. Cheers, +fuck you you cock biting jew licker. -steve +Yes, should be removed for two reasons (1) it's a trivia section lazily tacked onto the end of an article - this isn't 'fun facts' but an encyclopedia and (2) I can’t see any references and any unreferenced material in wikipedia can be removed at any time. This section has been tagged for some time now – I can’t see any move to incorporate it. It's not deletion that needs justification, rather, inclusion was never justified in the first place and should be justified before their return, bit by bit. +Translating/copying from another language wikipedia may not trigger the copyright bot but will still need attribution. Also please be sure to check that the French version is not a direct translation of the same copyright material used for this article. That would still be a copyright violation and not usable without permission here. The best course of action is to write the article from scratch in your own words. +Just take a good look at HighInBC's life. He has his biography there as plain as day for you to read. Now compare it to your life, look at why his attitude is the way it is, the underlying personal reasons for it, and then realize that you don't want any part of those deeper problems. Moderators troll. Welcome to Sikipedia. ( ) +" Do you know where I can get that lolcat that says ""lol i already has rolback, see?"" 110 Go Longhorns! " +"* Ya know, ... my thoughts are this. Back when I was young, it was all so defined. Yes-no, right-wrong, black-white. But it seems to me that over the years that's simply way too constraining. Truth be told, it's a matter of percentages. Me? I'm 99% white. 99% male. and likely 99.999% asshole. My views of Obama have absolutely nothing to do with the percentage of skin tone. I'll take Allen West or Ben Carson over Pelosi, Biden, Clinton, or Wolf any day of the week. I think racial tensions have declined drastically over the last 6 years. Police shooting? Obama? Wright? ... doesn't matter, it's as bad now as it was when I was growing up in the 50s. If you say ""you"" in any form, be it right wing or left wing .. it's profiling, and that's disgusting to me. I love my country, but in a lot of ways ""America"" is so juvenile in its understanding of humanity. Having ""big balls"" doesn't make a point of view right. —  ?  " +REDIRECT Talk:The North Carolina Highway Patrol K-9 incident +|decline=Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. :==( o ) +(UTC) Cheese existed in Old English and is untraceable before that, as it occurs in many Old Germanic tongues: [OE. (Anglian) cése, (WSax.) *cíese, cýse (with i- umlaut from céasi, c{aeacu}si) = OHG. châsi (MHG. kæse, Ger. käse), OLG. kâsi, kêsi (MDu. kâse, Du. kaas):{em}WGer. *kâsi, ad. L. c{amac}se-us cheese (bef. 5th c.).] According to the OED. No Latin mentioned anywhere, though I don't doubt that thw words should sound similar, as cheese would have been made in the indo-European period, and there may be a much much older connection as with the word Brother (similar in Greek, Latin, Germanic languages, and Indian Sanskrit). I do not know specifically about cheese, but maybe someone else does? It certainly existed in English before it was English (Anglo Saxon fron Anglian... etc) Thanks 10:52, 12 May 2006 +" August 2006 (UTC) Suck on my hairy balls bitch. Nothing is as sweet as cursing off morons like yourself. I would waste 100 more Wiki accounts just to curse your bitchass. Fucking bitch, thinks she punishes me by blocking. Fucking moron, as if this is a fucking prison and you are the warden. ""There I block you for 24 hours, that will teach you a lesson"". Ahaha, fucker, get a night life. Civility without character is a nicely dressed car without an engine, you self-righteous swine. Anyway, all that just in case you were planning to unblock me. Adios bitch. 15:05, 24" +You also need consensus to exclude the image. I agree with MotherAmy. Also, I can not see how the image in question is _not_ related to breastfeeding; please explane. +Plus, you get no barnstars from me, ever! +of Wrong Doing Now Stop with the Accusations and Personal attacks +" Only or last warning? Make up your mind please!! This was your first warning verbatim: ""This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Glock pistol, you will be blocked from editing. Dave1185 (talk) "" I did not delete content nor did I blank anything, I deleted a comment that I made while using someone else s account. That was an accident. I did not realize that my brother was signed in and after I though about it I realized that I was kind of a dick to the other editors, I deleted it. You responded by threatening with a ban for deleting what was mine to delete. After I responded in a condescending way to your threat, you apparently thought that i merited a second warning: ""This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Dave1185, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Dave1185 (talk) "" Then there's this: ""Last warning! Do this again and I'll see to it that you get nominated at WP:ANI or WP:AIV faster than you can spell your name out. BTW, I'm not an Admin. "" Well feel free to ban me or report me for being a dick and deleting something I shouldn't have posted to begin with. Errors while editing happen from time to time. Feel free to nominate me for anything but prom queen. I could really care less if you are offended. Whats more I find that your lack of good faith and threats to be childish. Have a blast, dick. 98.214.81.82 " +" Hi there. Seeing the crusading, fixated nature of MM I would have serious doubts about any information that he inserted into the article here. I restored the infobox info and deleted the diffamatory categories, but I seriously doubt the stuff he has inserted into the main text. From what I can gather, if the people were not Akan (""true Ghanaians"" according to MM) then he otherwise slurs them as being of the Ewe tribe, Togolese and so on. BTW, you did the right thing posting at BLPN, several people reacted rapidly, resulting in an indef block of Mark Mysoe, if you weren't aware already. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#MarkMysoe_blocked_indefinitely So feel free to edit those articles knowing that the guy~'s blocked (watch out for similar style editing from IPs, block evasion, or new accounts editing in the same way, socking). Good luck. Parley! " +" Plural Problem Wow it is clear that you, Nandesuka, are biased. You use pharses like ""browbeat editors"". I haven't browbeaten one, let alone 2 or more editors. Maybe you should do some research before blocking me. " +":It's out now, but under the title ""The Solar System Beyond Neptune"". " +My RFA Hey, thanks for participating in my recent RFA. You were amongst a number of editors who considered that I wasn't ready for the mop yet and as a consequence the RFA did not succeed (69/26/11). I am extremely grateful that you took the time to advise me on to improve as a Wikipedian and I'd like to assure you that I'll do my level best to develop my skills here to a point where you may feel you could trust me with the mop. I've been blown away by the level of interest taken in my RFA and appreciate the time and energy dedicated by all the editors who have contributed to it, support, oppose and neutral alike. I hope to bump into you again soon and look forward to serving you and Wikipedia in any way I can. Cheers! (the non-admin, formerly known as Budgiekiller) +Please forgive me Hi Sandstein, may I please ask you to forgive me for everything I have done to you? Thank you. I forgive you. You only need to focus on your pictures and deal with the complicated topics in a mature, neutral, reasonable way. That's it You got in trouble for being fundamentalist and extremist, and that always leads to conflict. Wake up some day feeling red and blue, black and white, Jew and Arab, Lefty and Righty,... You will realize that all have wrong sides and right sides at the same time. Being neutral is about learning to point those things that are right regardless of the topic and those that are wrong also regardless of the topic but respectfully. +South Serbia Presevo has nothing to do with South Serbia. South Serbia is Serbian Kosovo! +Ryulong-you seem to bully people. +If you could check any changes since my final revision, give it any last polish it needs, and send it out please, Mr Postman. Thank you! +(November, 2005 to May, 2007) +Sorry to keep involving you in this issue, but please, if you ghave the time, actually view the relevant Talk Page in the Kosovo article under Dardanian kingdom section (at bottom of T.P.). You will see that it is user Lontech that is being aggressive, un-academic and contrary to what other editors have suggested. Furthermore, he has blatantly mis-quoted and mis-used references, and is making racists outbursts, all just to push a POV which is not supported by historical reality +Yes, tough love. I am not saying that Giano is not good for the project, I am saying that personal attacks are not good for the project. I can say that without even knowing who the people are. You yourself are a very polite person and yet you defend your friends rudeness? I have found some things here that do not appear in reality and yet are bandied about by all and sundry...eg...we don't do cool down blocks...or....blocks are ..preventative and not punative......and..consensus..especially consensus. and a few others that have yet to enter my mind this morning. Let us start a thread to discuss this and have a setting of personal attacks and general rudeness is ok and lets see how constructive it gets. ( ) +Then your browser must hate a lot of commonly-used things here, like this tag ({{fact}}): What browser do you use? == +to edit for you everytime +" I apologize, I did not realize ""Texan"" is a profanity. 69.105.172.180 " +YA GODDAMIT IDIOT MY IP CHANGES WHEN AN ADMISTOR BANNED MY ORIGINAL IP SO DONT BLOCK ME U D!CK +Excuses for keeping to content that makes it look like circumcision is also a Christian ritual, and yet no mention of Islam which by far carries out more circumcisions than America or Jews or anyone else. +Eurostar Hi there. My recent edits on the Eurostar page gave a better view of the train itself and not so much the station. It is a better image which is why I used it. I don't see how it's not constructive. Thank you. 86.176.5.53 +" PS: You forgot to add "" Mid-40 yr old PERVERT WIKING PORN STARS"" " +" Ancient Egyptians were Caucasoid Modern studies on ancient egyptian dentition clusters them with Caucasoids (Europeans, Western Asians) who have small teeth, as opposed to Negroids (Western Sub-Saharan Africans) who have megadont/large teeth. Sources: Irish J.D. (1998). ""Diachronic and synchronic dental trait affinities of late and post-pleistocene peoples from North Africa"". Homo. 49(2) 138-155 Hanihara T and Ishida H. (2005). ""Metric dental variation of major human populations"". American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 128. Issue 2. pp. 287-298. " +I like your style You were stiff to get interesting info about Mentone Grammar School deleted. sort yourself out please, valuable info can't be deleted. snake out, +" The official site has two routes: an international route and a mainland China route. Furthermore fusing the routes (in contradicition to the site of the Olympics) makes it just unreadable. Moreover, on the official site, Hong Kong and Macau are being reffered to as Hong Kong and Macau not as Hong Kong, China and Macau, China or any other names. If you are so afraid of Hong Kong's flag, remove all flags and country-names (or ""areas"" as you wish to call it), remove the term country and just list the cities on TWO routes, as the official site does. -( " +" Posting here is best, unless the discussion starts at the article level. After posting your response, type 4 tilde's ""~"" at the end of your post and that date stamps your posting. Right now an automatic bot is running that does it for you. Some other hints - Use the ""Show Preview"" page when you are editing and review and make changes until you're satisfied with your edits, then ""Save page"" - otherwise the page has a long history of edits for the same update. I only want to re-emphasize again that WP is an encyclopedia, not here for promotion. I'm glad you are expanding your article and will hold off on an WP:Afd until other editors chime in. To be safe, make sure you present information in a neutral and unbiased fashion - do not add promotional language. Present Pros and Cons - a clear indication that you are attempting to be unbiased in your presentation. Keep ""external links"" to a minimum and use inline citations instead. ""Official Website"" is sufficient. If you get a great review from an outside, independent source, reference it. Don't use paid inclusions or PR material - again a red flag because they are not unbiased. The standards are written up pretty well here WP:CORP. Good luck. " +Petroleum and Iraq Hi! I saw that you have been helping out in the Iraq War page on the issue of whether and how oil played a role in the U.S. going to war. I don't know if you know a lot about this topic, but I think the discussion of that issue in the [Rationale for the Iraq Warr#Petroleum] article could use a lot of improvement. Any interest in helping me out with that topic? Thanks! +No problem. I'm hoping to finish the categorizing of the road infoboxes by the end of the night. If you catch any other mistakes, let me know. Woohoo! +" The commercial, along with dialog in the show itself, 'poking fun' at The Mentalist's similarities is enough to note, imo. I'm not saying that there needs to be a section on the main article called ""The Mentalist is a ripoff..."" but it wouldn't hurt to mention the 'feud' in the 'reception' section." +160x160 pixels? Can someone explain the 160x160 graphic mode in more detail? If the machine normally used 23 lines of text with an 8x8 pixel matrix, that would give 23*8=184 pixels of height. Double-height characters would imply half of that, i.e. 92 pixels. The 200 characters mentioned is enough for a square-shaped array of 14x14 characters. 14*8 = 112. Since 92 != 112 != 160 I am confused -) +Help with my projects I would love to have someone help guide me through the creation of my page. I have written a basic text in the userpage section and I am looking for feedback on if the references I have posted will be passable. Two are personal websites and the other is a Kenndy Cneter Artist Description. Mostly I would love for someone to look what I have already done on the userpage section. I also will need help moving from the userpage to an actual edit. Thanks! -Rebecca Lemus +As after one week we have a 4-1 majority for the name change it should be done. +External links add I think this sould be added to the external links, it's a how to web site that teach people how to be like people. It's neat, this one is about batman. How to be like batman +your a fucking bell end +" 1) I shall do all the work alone. That's a clear breach against AGF and the ""Joy of Editing"". 2) Taxation is crime in the sense of libertarin tenet. Simple. 3) I have not used tax to cite something. So I cant be very wrong in citing it. Your logic false. It is not forbidden by polices to cite any well source. Circular references are also possible from one cite to an other, Wikipedia or not. 4) You mean new synthesis. 5) No. One must be able to write something in own words. This is again an example of your unconscionable interpretations of policies. " +What to do about this talk page? Demote Dougweller from janitor to chimney sweep! FAST! +, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Dead links happen. I still have the PDF of the actual print article that appeared in the print edition of MCAD-Vision. Would you like me to send it to you? If so, email me so I can email an attachment. 16:11 +" LordAmeth once again, many thanks for nominating me. I have a question, though I noticed that the process was ""scheduled to end"" at 16:52 today, and we're past that now...what happens next? " +LAHS Article re: Los Alamos High School Basically I had stopped doing the wikipedia thing because I got tired of babysitting Peter Ekman (the notorious groper of eXile infamy). But this article for LAHS had atrophied so much that I was kind of offended after all the work I put into creating it. Apparently LAHS is most notable for the rate it graduates Wikipedia vandals. I saw that you got rid of some of that, btw, so thanks. Anyway I went back and fixed it up. I know you're busy with the PhD and everything but when you get a chance maybe you could advise me how I could take the horribly pixelated LAHS logo and turn it into a smooth vector graphic. Also if you know a page that has some pointers on how best to insert graphics into pages without messing up the layout, that would be sweet. When you get the time. +Why not merge this into part of the Pakistan page? Seems like you blanked the individual stamp pages... +== ATTENTION == Poop....that is all this page will self destruct in 10 seconds, i suggest you leave the FCS computer lab... or press ALT+F4 right now. +Box formatting Something's wrong with the flag and coat of arms label, at the top of the box on the right. Can someone fix it? +his record of 168 male relative sexual experiences in2007. Any minute now he will send a message to me informing me that my comments are not constructive unless he's busy stroking his nephew's pubes.. +" I (someone else) would recommend against the use of the term ""facing."" While there are many regional term variants, I've never heard or read of this one. It would be perhaps better to refer readers to the following terms (where they will be able to find a lot of information): * engraving - using small chisels (gravers) to carve line art into metal. * chasing - using small blunt rods to drive particularly shaped grooves into sheetmetal. * repoussé (embossing) - using chasing tools and a pitch bowl to shape sheetmetal into bas-relief artwork from the backside of the metal." +", 5 March 2014 (UTC) I am familiar with it, thank you. You had at least 3 other editors disputing the BLP issue. Just saying ""BLP"" doesn't give you an automatic pass to revert forever. It really doesn't work that way. If you felt that strongly about it, you should have gone to BLPN about it to try to get support for your position. However, this discussion is not about any other issue. I made that clear. But you can't help yourself. I will not further litter this man's page with responses to issues I didn't come here to discuss. Do try to stay on point for a change. 16:24" +" Thanks for the revert Thanks for reverting the 'accusations' on my talk page; Jeff returns periodically avoiding his permanent block, pretending to be someone else while trying to embellish his page with what he considers flattering information. Unfortunately he acts in such a recognizable way the regular editors of his bio page recognize these edits with ease for what they are. (☎|@|C) ." +Von Haug's fate was NOT revealed Play the game again. +Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#What is an extremist source?. Cheers, +Most known roll is not Inuyasha, it'd either be the announcer for Enzyte or as Megatron in a multitude of Transformers series. +Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codf1977 Please note that you are mentioned in the following sockpuppetry investigation that I have instigated: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codf1977 +I wonder the reason you guys are so dumb is because you have brain damage causing you not to look at stuff thats IMPORTANT to the show +" It would indeed seem that the literal ""anti-immigrant"" would be a far better translation for ""främligsfientlighet"" instead of xenophobic. ' " +im a fuckin ass hole n i like dicksI +Britt Lapthorne Hey, sorry for the hasty edit, but I did offer an explanation in the discussion page, I don't see how her dissapearance qualifies for MWWS as it was documented in Australia and Croatia. In Australia, as far as I know having lived here for 23 years, there is no MWWS, all people who go missing, from Australian born to European tourists to Aborigine people are reported and covered with no bias shown. Please feel free to discuss this with me =) Thanks, 58.107.179.146 +ur a butthole. y u undo my edits? dey wus kunstruktive. u jst jealuz of myh wikkipeedya skils hoamie g. +" RE I can't believe I'm having this conversation with somebody who believes global warming is a myth. Look, I was trying to warn you that sending someone links to pages on ""how to edit wikipedia for beginners"" when they have made a mistake with AWB - surely that alone shows that they aren't some idiot - is not going to get you many friends. " +ARE YOU DOING THIS BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE 1000000000 EDITS?????? +And right on cue your white knight rushes in to protect you. 67.76.14.136 +Wow man, IT's not original research. But I guess you can't read. Whats gonna happen when you claim that my contributions are vandalism? What are you can restrict my Ip? Oh, I'm so scared. I'll just hit one button and my IP will change. Work with the community not against it. It wasn't vandalism. Don't give me a warning for contributing good literature to the community. 75.139.103.133 +" Barnstar The Working Woman's Barnstar I award this barnstar to two fantastic lady editors and for their participation in vetting other contributors' DYK suggestions at Template talk:Did you know. The high-visibility work of frequently contributing DYK articles often gets recognition, but the lower-visibility work of vetting other contributors' DYK suggestions at TT:DYK (something that makes the DYK process ""go"") often go unnoticed. JamieS93 and Orlady: thanks for your work that makes the DYK process ""go"". Have a nice day. -) " +Random Question What are you going to or are majoring in college? - Library science, hopefully in digital archiving if they have it available by the time I'm finished with the general requirements for my degree. It's such a shame that so many sources aren't available on the Internet, partially due to a lack of money to get them up but also largely due to a lack of manpower. I'd say that it's awful that I'm so excited over the idea of that, but then I suppose I should be that excited. XD (｡◕‿◕｡) +, see what is stated here on my user page? I see no reason that you need to contact me via email regarding the Human sex ratio article. I also don't visit that email often; what I mean by that is that because Wikipedia has been having trouble with using Yahoo! email, I very recently changed my Wikipedia email from Yahoo! to that address, but I am not very interested in checking that new account (it's foreign to me). Simply reply to me on your talk page or my talk page. Using Wikipedia to reply is not difficult. Remember to sign your username at the end of the comments you make on Wikipedia talk pages. All you have to do to sign your username is simply type four tildes (~), like this: ~~~~. A bot signed your username for you above. +|listas = Guckelberger, Carl Gustav +" Wow.. You really are a wikipedia nerd... Go ahead, ban me, it wouldn't do anything good. Seriously, you do not fucking mess with. You don't fuck with me... Now go ahead, ban me you little wikipedia nerd, it just proves you have no life... -⊕ talk" +Congratulations! Congratulations, Jeraphine Gryphon, you have won the asshole of the year award! You have won this award by saying mean things about and to other people! In order to claim your award, you must call 1-800-Asshole(1-800-277-4653)! Once again, congratulations for your win! 142.163.76.125 +" I politely asked you for your opinion on certain sources That I was unsure about, but you deleted it without any comment? Why NJGW? ??? ...the Nixon administration decided to try to ensure that international financial relations should be taken out of the control of state Central Banks and should be increasingly centred upon private financial operators. It sought to achieve this goal through exploiting US control over international oil supplies. It is still widely believed that the sharp and steep increase in oil prices in 1973 was carried out by the Gulf states as part of an anti-Israel and anti-US policy connected to the Yom Kippur war. Yet as we now know, the oil price rises were the result of US influence on the oil states and they were arranged in part as an exercise in economic statecraft directed against America’s ‘allies’ in Western Europe and Japan. And another dimension of the Nixon administration’s policy on oil price rises was to give a new role, through them, to the US private banks in international financial relations. The Nixon administration was planning to get OPEC to greatly increase its oil prices a full two years before OPEC did so and as early as 1972 the Nixon administration planned for the US private banks to recycle the petrodollars when OPEC finally did take US advice and jack up oil prices. The Nixon administration understood the way in which the US state could use expanding private financial markets as a political multiplier of the impact of US Treasury moves with the dollar. But according to the Nixon’s Ambassador in Saudi Arabia at the time, the principal political objective behind Nixon’s drive for the OPEC oil price rise was to deal a crippling blow to the Japanese and European economies, both overwhelmingly dependent on Middle East Oil, rather than to decisively transform international financial affairs. Nevertheless , Nixon’s officials showed far more strategic insight into the consequences of what they were attempting than most political scientists would credit any government with. Its capacity for deception both over the oil price rise and in the way in which it manipulated discussions with its ‘allies’ in the IMF over so-called ‘international monetary reform’ was brilliant. The US government realised that the oil price rises would produce an enormous increase in the dollar earnings of oil states that could not absorb such funds into their own productive sectors. At the same time, the oil price rises would plunge very many states into serious trade deficits as the costs of their oil imports soared. So the so-called petrodollars would have to be recycled from the Gulf through the Western banking systems to non-oil-producing states. Other governments had wanted the petrodollars to be recycled through the IMF. But the US rejected this, insisting the Atlantic world’s private banks (at that time led by American banks) should be the recycling vehicles. And because the US was politically dominant in the Gulf, it could get its way... - The Globalization Gamble: The Dollar-Wall Street Regime and its Consequences By Peter Gowan http://www.iwgvt.org/files/9-gowan.rtf http://www.marxsite.com/Global%20Gamble2.htm http://www.amazon.com/Global-Gamble-Washingtons-Faustian-Dominance/dp/1859842712 218.186.68.129 'I am 100 per cent sure that the Americans were behind the increase in the price of oil. - Sheikh Yamani, Former Saudi Oil Minister http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2001/jan/14/globalrecession.oilandpetrol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Zaki_Yamani V.H.Oppenheim: “Why Oil Prices Go Up? The Past: We Pushed Them”, Foreign Policy,25 Winter 1976-77 Since 1971, the United States has encouraged middle east oil-producing states to raise the price of oil and keep it up... http://www.jstor.org/pss/1148022 20 Years of Censored News: Why Oil Prices go up While most Americans believe the increase in oil prices was due to the Arab oil embargo started in 1973, few are aware that their elected representatives collaborated with the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and Persian oil-producing nations to deliberately inflate the price of oil... Kissinger's Yom Kippur oil shock http://earth.prohosting. +" further move needed on reviewed article Hi, thanks for reviewing one of my submissions. However, you moved it to Doncram/George Bradshaw House and Joshua Salisbury/George Bradshaw Barn, not a correct mainspace name. I think it (with Talk page that you set up, thanks) should go to George Bradshaw House and Joshua Salisbury/George Bradshaw Barn. Thanks! ncram " +fuck you shut the fuck up +questions Gravely concerning questions about the guru being involved in pedophilia raised by a family of followers from Little Rock. Arkansas were aired in a BBC documentary a couple of years ago. Any comments? +Reuters is also reporting that he's been killed due to his wounds. 94.195.251.61 +Thanks for your message Hi Roby, thanks for the little welcome note you left behind. I (my company) use(s) MediaWiki for logging our work, taking notes, official documentation, project planning, ... and so on. So yes, I am reasonably comfortable with Wikipedia, and I will sign my contributions wherever necessary/ wherever I'd like someone to check with me in case s/he has different opinions on something I wrote. ) +What's the deal with SineBot anywho? I don't get the big deal about signing.... +^^^ think this scares me? what will they do. nothing. grow up, stop taking wikipedia so seriously you pathetic saps. +Please, Reddy, no personal attacks. Remember the last arbitration we went through? +" Talkback speaks " +"DUDE, i am 53, and possess degrees in philosophy, science and theologyfrom Notre Dame, not from a vo-tech where you likely went after finally getting your GED. You offer rejoinders to my points without ever having addressed them. Clearly you are unfamiliar with Pope John XXIII, the pontiff who facilitated Vatican II in the early 1960's, and who intentionally refused to refer to the Catholic Church as the ""Roman"" Catholic Church. It is equally patently obvious you know nothing about Father McBrien or Charles Whitehead. Are you incapable of reading above a fifth-grade level, or do you just lack the capacity for intelligent thought? What's most remarkable is that rather than take solace in your own self-assured beliefs, you repeatedly return to this forum in a juvenile effort to have the last word. i have one last word for you: chill. Again, grow up and grow deep. We in the Catholic Church forgive you for your obstinance and your ignorance. " +Never mind that the gun in this pic is clearly gas operated (large piston under the barrel) while the MP-6/NS-37/NS-45 family (OKB-16) were all short recoil. +Are you in a band by any chance? Totally random question. Your username could be a reference to a specific band, or indicate that you're part of that band. +yep no worries there. I thought I was pushing my luck! +Not noteworthy, and I also reverted the prescriptive and unnecessary material about holding back. +" Hi Nicholas: What are the specfic objections? Are you familiar with what has been going on surrounding the Berel Wein article and its proposed deletion? Are you aware of what User:PZFUN has ""proposed""? " +State of the Union, Jerry Oppenheimer Oppenheimer, Jerry. State of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton. HarperCollins, 2000. ISBN 0-06-019392-1. i would like to add some material from this book. does anyone here consider this book unreliable or poorly sourced? should there be no objection, i will start adding material in 254 hours. +" What exactly is wrong with these discussions you've ""userfied"" and on what grounds do you move them? " +Just thought I'd weigh in here. We [or at least I] are [am] not saying Afghan is incorrect. I actually use Afghan and would not use Afghani or Afghanistani. But there's a source for Afghanistani, so don't we have to include it as well? I really don't think WP is supposed to be normative; if that's false, please direct me to the policy. The version which I want to see includes all three demonyms, with sources, and Afghan listed first. +HATE FOOD EATING CONTEST THIS IS THE MOST DISGUSTING FORM OF PASSE TIME EVER. IT TURN ME OFF +Please stop defending pedophilia on MY talk page. If you like it so much, this is the place. Live it up and I'll ignore you. Hopefully the cops won't. Leave it the hell off my talk page, it's disgusting. +" Attempts to circumvent AfD The AfD for Wikifiddler will determine whether the contents will stay under that title, whether they will be merged to a different article, or whether they will be deleted without merge. Your repeated copying of the entire article to Andrew Orlowski before the conclusion of that AfD is an attempt to circumvent the process, and the fact that you are doing so in bad faith, aware that what you do is wrong, is shown by your falsely flagging it each time as a ""minor edit"" (disputed edits are never minor edits, refusing to use an edit summary, and your failure to note on either talk page that you are copying the entire contents of one article verbatim into the other. Your chutzpah in describing it as ""vandalism"" when these bad-faith edits of yours are reverted is stupidity. Are you really so very in love with Orlowski that when he rants about Wikipedians who act badly you have to leap to fulfill his prophecy by exhibiting the worst behavior you can calculate? I'd have to say the same to you. You have been stupid enough to blank out and revert the article, even though I have extensively added to the material. Since Orlowski clearly is watching Wikipedia closely (see the material you blanked out, you moron) I hope he's watching this discussion and finding it as amusing as I do. Your repeated attempts to censor this material are laughable. " +, 9 June 2006 (UTC) I do not share your opinion at all in this case, HRE. Sorry to disapoint you. Being a person that lived through the Kosovo war, I have the right to judge my way, and as such, those buttons in my page are completely justified. You have your reasons (which I really do not understand, as you are in no way related to Kosovo, neither were there during the war) which are based mainly in what propaganda you (have been) are fed. Regards, 20:48 +EXCIRIAL YOU ARE A JOKE - DO NOT PISS ME OFF REMOVE THE BLOCK +") I remain in disagreement with any attempt to editorialize in the article that the United State's need for oil, rather than the companies involved, ""created"" this disaster, as the OP seemed to suggest. However I support inclusion of the public reaction in the UK into the article. Perhaps that section could be divided into US reaction / UK reaction sections? Your source is a good start, it seems to show rampant anti-Americanism in the UK and elsewhere in Europe. ""Comments on British message boards this week have been full of anger at the United States."" And... ""The rest of the world is fed up with the parasitic attitude of the U.S...As a Dutch citizen, I used to be a supporter of the U.S., but not anymore. You want the oil? You clean up the mess."" Yes, this sort of attitude is remarkable and should be included in the article. 22:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC" +"==Etymology== Anthro = man -pod = foot So Anthropod means man's foot? It is arthro and not anthro. arthro means joint —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) can't pod also mean leg? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Ill get started on an Anthropod article (I searched, and there actually isn't one). Then we can compare the two. I really have no expertise on this subject whatsoever, but doesn't 'Anthropod' refer to a totally different species? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that there is a common confusion of Arthropod and Anthropodhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anthropod (at least on Google). In that case it would be (as it was for me) highly irritating to refer one page to the other. Or am I missing something? Sebowsky —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.241.56.102 Taxonomic table Setting up the table has already caused one fair comment to be raised about what happens to the taxon Uniramia. My visits to various sites on the Net has taught me that the situation about the higher classification of the arthropods is chaotic. Valid arguments could be made for any of many of these schemes. The disturbing thing is that many of these different schemes appear on ""dot edu"" where they are presented as a professor's gospel to his class. I've probably already left the impression that, right or wrong, I have a preference to the ITIS scheme, and by extension (since ITIS is focused on North America) looking at the ""Species 2000"" where applicable. I tend to use these on a ""without prejudice"" basis that recognizes the difficulties inherent in having bureaucrats control the science. This view treats ITIS as a reference point, and nothing more. If a person B's particular scheme differs from ITIS in a defined way it is 1 generation removed from ITIS. A similar situation applies if C's scheme differs in defined way from ITIS. However, if C defines his scheme with reference to B's then he is 2 generations removed from the reference point. String a few schemes in a row, and you begin to lose perspective on the subject. Cladists have a stated vision of some day being rid of Linnean ranks altogether. Given the uncertainty that often arises from guessing whether a particular taxon is a class or an order, I can sympathize with that view. But without ranks the cladist's tree sometimes lacks good climbing branches where you can place your feet as you go up. I think that if we can maintain some consistency in using the primary KPCOFGS rankings, we can have more flexibility with the secondary rankings. There is already some degree of acceptance that in most cases only primary ranks will appear in what was the ""Placement"" list, and what is now the top part of the tables. That doesn't mean that there can be no exceptions to this rule. (Cf. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules) So, to get back on topic, higher arthropod classification is confused! But there remains that if we want anything about the subject on Wikipedia, we absolutely need to deal with the confusion. Here then is where I see things as standing between phylum and class in the Arthropoda: The trilobites (not listed in ITIS) are a phylum with a single class, and that fact appears generally accepted - no problem. ""Generally accepted""? Granted, I'm no expert (I've read a book about trilobytes, is all), but a quick google on ""trilobite phylum"" got me lots of assertions that trilobites are part of arthropoda. And trying ""trilobyte classification"" got me a claim that there are eight classes of trilobytes. Vicki Rosenzweig Yes - were is it generally accepted? I was taught that trilobites were a class of Arthropods and my animal biology text from 1996 confirms this. Has something changed since my freshman year of college? maveric149 +" Speedy deletion declined: Master Lock Hello Sud Ram. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Master Lock, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. (talk→  ←track) " +Judicial aspects of felony conviction The article does not make it clear that the termination of Sloan's custody rights did not just toss Shamema into some arbitrarily-chosen foster home as if Sloan was some sort of unfit parent. Sloan was never found to be an unfit parent or a danger to his daughter. The essential ingredient in the termination of Sloan's parental righs was U.S. dollars. Shemema was returned to the USA because the couple (who were private US citizens) had the money to pay and agent to get Shemema back. That US couple wanted to raise Shamema as a Christian, which Sloan did not want. No gov't agencies of any sort were involved in that action. Sloan's wife as the time had been coerced by the paid agents. The coersion by their agent included implied threats against the health and safety of that woman's own children, but those threats occurred outside of US territory. During Sloan's time as a fugitive, the gov't of the USA had custody of him multiple times and chose not to extradict him back to Virginia simply because of the expense involved. Sloan was a fugitive in name only and only because one Viriginia judge was annoyed at him and he the authority to make him a fugitive rather than just let Shemama's natural parent raise her as he saw fit. I am asking for balance in the presentation of this story. It is not as simple as the text currently suggests and the implications, as the the text currently stands, that Sloan was simply just another irresponsible, unfit parent. Please review the facts and ensure that the text reflects the real ambiguities of the situation. We are not here to re-determine the best interests of Shamema: we are here to report the Truth w/o any implied defamation of Sloan's character. He is a convicted felon and we make that clear enough, but was fail to present the proper context of the termination of his parental rights. +" For your information, Bishonen, there is simply so much information that I must find a way to sort through it all effectively. Per the tone of your discussion on IRC however, it was made clear to me that you were not concerned in what I thought but in denegrating me, so I will follow Cyde's excellent advice and steer well clear of you. Talk| Please email me instead of posting here" +NPOV Kindly explain what edits you claim I've made - that are not themselves Yuber's nonsensical POV pushing - were POV. I've seen enough abuses of Admin power over the years to wonder if you're not just yet another POV-pushing admin. But I'm assuming good faith on your part for now. +I don't believe that. I expect that your prior account contains ample examples of prior misbehaviour, And I'm already sick of your incessant innuendo. +removed a large section of text which was unclear, awkward and confusing. it reference the 'first annesley hall'; perhaps a disambiguation page is in order if there's another annesley hall. +" Featured lists on the main page (perhaps!) Hi there. There's a discussion here about the possibility of getting featured lists their own section on the main page. The discussion has turned to presenting a few lists that would represent the quality and diversity of topics that we cover, and a list that you were involved with has been mentioned specifically. It'd be great to get your thoughts. Regards, " +Let me know any feedback about my edits +It is not quite the same thing, firstly I write my own replies, and secondly I have participated in discussion about BJCP on this page, quite clearly giving my reasons for wanting the BJCP link to be retained. 24.8.16.209 has never posted here until very recently and has given no reason for not wanting the BJCP link. It will be interesting to see if I get a reply from 24.8.16.209. +French production According to Liron, there was only one Monitor II, so no French production? +I will be adding summary. +I commented out the unsourced material and replaced it with a summary of the account from Fort Caroline#History. +" Dave, referring to McKitrick's ""fringe views"" is particularly unjustifiable here, as McK has published several peer-reviewed papers on UHI, which is why JGR selected him as a reviewer for the BEST UHI submittal which has apparently been sent back for further revisions. His review comments make interesting reading. I'm not sure what blog you are complaining about surely not Revkin's dot Earth column? Anyway, I agree it's premature to add McK's review comments here better to wait for a 3rd party article. Best, " +" Such removals can be made, subject to certain restrictions; it is called 'oversight'. Please see the explanation and instructions on how to apply for a removal in Wikipedia:Requests for oversight. Feel free to remove this section. Best,  ►  " +Only if the same applies to Jimmy. ;-) +you seem to be confused.... I never said that you could not post comments on the india talk page!!! I think that its good so that indian wikipedians can correct the many fasle claims being made (for example, the Indus being pakistan, this is laughable). What I did say, as I keep on repeating, and you keep on misunderstanding, that I didnot appreciate you butting into an argument without being asked.Instead, you should have created another topic ( by pressing the plus symbol next to edit). Second of all, it is quite intresting to observe that the person who has tried to edit my english, has spelled interfering incorrectly, when I wrote it correctly in my reply!!! Finally, I would appreciate if you kept out of others buisness unless you are asked-( for moral support, more knowledge etc.) +Are you still scrounging off the state Rod? +" Markus has a new DJ compilation coming out later this month titled ""Amsterdam '07"". I am tempted to add it onto his compilation discography, but since the announcement does not say what the record label will be, I'm under the impression that I should wait until the compilation is officialy out. Forum thread announcing the comp - Markus' Official Forum " +" re: your message Hi Nedim Ardoğa, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page . " +" What this appears to be is a collection of school kids who cry out, ""Listen, you old farts! We have this funky new word/concept/idea and we're going to use it, spread it around, and grab this chance at immortality. If you disagree, we'll make fun of your self-inflated intelligence."" So be it. Then make a web page and tell your tale. But, this isn't encyclopedic. I voted delete, and made it strong delete because of all the silly puppetry. I don't see my vote changing. " +File:Grammar Nazi.svg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grammar Nazi.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +Wikipedia Supports Racism By not allowing the statments taken directly from his Transcripts to be used to show that He is a blatent Racist who is on par with the KKK is more evidence that the moderators are in fact supporters of Racism and the White Supremisist movement supported by Hal Turner. The Legion Will fight to change this. +" Thanks. About that one, IIRC, I thought that the primary source was US federal, so pd. But now I cannot find anything about it being federal, only county, and I am not sure if this is pd - so I rewrote anyway as part of my pass updating some old contribs of mine to modern standards, adding inline cites, and all. I hope this fixed any issues that this article might have had. | talk " +REDIRECT Talk:Ranks in Martial Arts +REDIRECT Talk:List of opera genres +Re: Rollback As far as I can tell by roughly looking at my contribs, I've made somewhere around 7000 edits (possibly more or less) in the last 8 months since I was last blocked, and except for reverting vandalism, I don't believe I have reverted any editor more than once in a 24 hour period, although there might be a few exceptions that I may have missed; in fact I do believe there was one incident where I reverted an editor twice. As for my three blocks, the first was for reverting an editor three times in a 24 hour period, the second was erroneous, as I was blocked for reverting scibaby vandalism on sight three times, and the third was for making three reverts to the same article I was originally blocked. In other words, in all three instances I was not blocked for violating 3RR (even though Madman claims I was in the edit summary; he never retracted in the edit summary but he did retract on my talk page and another administrator came forward to criticize the block[ser_talk:Viriditas/Archive_18#Blocked]). As for the other two blocks, I have made three exceptional changes to insure that I was not blocked again, including permanently leaving the article of which I was the primary contributor; abstaining from editing alongside the editor I was involved in the edit war with, and; leaving that particular WikiProject altogether to avoid running into the same editor by accident. Since that time, eight months have passed with little if any problems to report, and during that time I have continued to revert vandalism to Hawaii-related articles. I believe that I do not have a history of disruptive editing, however, I did have a problem with a particular editor on a particular article who worked on a particular project, and I have eliminated that problem by ignoring the editor, removing myself from the article, and unsubscribing from the project. Does this alleviate your concerns? +" No, #2 is the correct meaning. #1 is nonsense, as it is vacuously satisfied for any statement in any theory: one of the two algorithms ""return YES"" and ""return NO"" always works. I do not see any ambiguity in the formulation, it clearly starts with an existential quantifier, and in any case, there is a link to decidability (logic) which explains it in detail. You just have to read carefully. —  J. " +there should be a discussion on the issue that kids from around the country had bake sales and stood on corners asking for change for a memorial for the thousands killed,,,, why is it that exectutives are paid $500 to $1,000 a day,, ( plus beenfits......... this info should be included in the article....... +Syria Why is Syria included in the list, when the map clearly shows Syria in grey? +You are a stupid cunt bitch +" Oh and for the record, I am not suggesting we say ""Ben Stein is a quote mining prick"". I'm just curious if anyone else thinks the title is less than precise and if so does anyone have a good suggestion. " +Bashar, 1887 | birth_date = | birth_place = West Hills, Town of Huntington, Long Island, New York, U.S. | death_date = | death_place = Camden, New Jersey, U.S. | signature = +Yes, that is your opinion that you share with Tony Sideaway. The folks who specialize in Civility at WP:CCD disagree with both you on this. Tony Sideaway, please see my comment up Userboxes DRV. I would like to know whats the priorities are. +, the automated system detected my edit as vandalism when I was just adding to the article}} +" Discussion of the involvement of the Bielski group with other partisan groups in reallife belong on the article with the group. Wikipedia has an obligation to document the controversy, including of course the statements of supporters of the group as prominently as critics of it. The question here is that it is usual to discuss in historical film the question of how true to history it is. Considering that the very involvement is uncertain, the wording here would have to be very tentative. Whatever is here or anywhere has to be in neutral non-loaded language, as elsewhere in Wikipedia. Anyone who actually doesn't know the reputation of the NKVD can find out from the article on them, we do not need to use the word ""feared"". The way to deal with topics as difficult as this is as soberly as possible. For one thing, it gives less of an impression of propaganda. In other words, Gwen is completely right in her sentence at the start of this section. ' ' " +The sources tend to indicate that his being African-American, and the fact of his being the first, are of great (one could say monumental) importance in American politics. It's not really a question of whether one agrees or not. In a perfect world it would not be a big deal, and people would see him simply as the President... or could mention race as an interesting cultural characteristic like being left-handed or a basketball fan. But the world is not perfect, and his being the first black president of America represents a historical shift in race relations. Perhaps ten years from now societal mores will change and it will not figure so prominently. Wikipedia as an encyclopedia is a product of its times, and inasmuch as it draws on sources with cultural biases, it is a product of the various cultures that produce the sources it cites. It's not practical to try to achieve objectivity through logical analysis - that's also a form of bias. +> Wikipedia is not a medium for people to use to promote a campaign. +Host desecration Assistance of what sort? - crztalk +Sulasgeir You have flagged my Sulasgeir article as a copy from Culture Hebrides. In fact this copyight violation is exactly the other way around. An article by me has been credited to Finlay MacLeod. I wrote the original about ten years ago. +yo, as*hole im gonna kill you and steal ur huge monitor! +You fucking piece of shit I'm going to hunt you down and murder you violently, you disgusting paki twat +You are wrong You are wrong in my opposition to Joturner's RfA. I do NOT oppose him because he believes something I do not, as you incorrectly stated, I oppose him because of the fear I have that, based on his zealous userpage regarding his religion, that he will NOT be able to maintain a NPOV. I am Catholic, pretty devout, and I would oppose a fellow Catholic if he/she too was overzealous in their POV. That said, I have the RIGHT as a sentinent life form to have my own opinion and that is something that the liberal left and the conservative right can NEVER take away from me, so don't even try. +"::::My ""vested interest"" is in upholding BLP articles. I could give a rat's ass who the BLP is, but when I see information in an article which violates BLP, it gets removed. " +If you're the user , could you please sign in before blanking your user page? Thanks! +OMS, this obsession with your accusation of Miss Bono's account and mine being somehow related or a SPA is bordering on disruptive and I'm going to politely request that you stop at this time. I do not want to have to request intervention on this. Please and thank you. +Thanks Zuggernaut Thanks Zuggernaut for linking Uttam Kamble, I was amazed that he didn't have an article, so created it. +Thanks for the star! I was not looking for affirmation. Are you willing to spend some time fixing up citations? I must admit that I do not bother much with the correct style with these, and my work will be limited to ref tags. Different people have different enthusiasm for doing things! +Category:Feminism task force articles +In addition, Corwin's claim that Pershing was never really promoted to the rank of General of the Armies is (I hate to say it) absolutely ludicrous. Every military text book in existence that mentions Pershing speaks of him holding this rank, his service record has documentation of this rank, and check out this link with at least five separate statements that Pershing was a General of the Armies . I can perhaps imagine that we cant find the actual paper Wilson signed promoting Pershing (it might have been destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire) but Pershing was obviously a General of the Armies. On that point, there can be absolutely no doubt. - +I posted the two images in question - though not quite sure why I posted the cover. But I am no longer interested in convincing a robot that it's okay to use them, so will post it here and if the keepers of the article want them, or different ones, or whatever, than they can figure it out. The folio that they are scanned from was published in 1927 and does not claim to be copyrighted. By that time Pugin's drawings were 75 (or whatever) years old and probably copyright free. Perhaps using the cover was a bad idea, but it is in a section of the article discussing publication, but I think the drawings are an asset to the article. perhaps I should just let the delitionists have at these and then post others with a more carefully picked copyright (or lack there-of) tag. Any ideas? +thanks, it appears that you didn't read any of the links above. here i will provide the key one again: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Writing_about_yourself_and_your_work. i think your response would have been different, had you read that. would you please read that, and reply again? thanks. +" BUT I DIDNT ""DISCLOSED PERSONAL INFORMATION"" ANYON EWHO LIVES NEAR YOU CAN KNOW YOUR NAME" +" ""reinserting sourced information. How much longer are you going to insist that sourced information has no place in this article?"" I didn't removed ""sourced"" information. O moved it to where it belongs albeit only allegations and not proven charges. But I see that isn't good enough for POV shills like you. Very well then. Sign the mediation or prepare to be banned from Wikipedia. Your choice. " +Unhelpful lede For those of us who are unfamiliar with US history, the lede is extremely unhelpful. The introduction should provide a comprehensive, yet simple overview of the whole topic, covering the main points. This lede doesn't even say whether the Confederate Army was the North or South. I know that to Americans it's a no-brainer, but I came to this article to find out that particular piece of info, and it should be in the intro. 206.116.59.222 +Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! Do I know you? BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == +That block is uncalled for, as were was my warning? I'm not guilty of harrassment... +Again, why do you people step on egg-shells when it comes to Jayjg's blatant Zionist bias. He does this with EVERY Israeli/Jewish-related article. If anything criticizes Israel then he cries about anti-Semitism. Absolutely disgusting. People like him are ruining the project. +" Why do you think that animal liberation movement is a ""fringe"" term? It gets 38,000 Google hits. Why should the lead include the phrase ""animal rights activists? It says ""activists,"" and this is an article about the animal rights movement, so it's probably not referring to anti-abortion activists. I have no idea what you mean by your research showing etc. It sounds like your OR. We don't need a separate list of activists, for reasons that have been explained several times by several people, people on both sides of the pro- and anti-AR divide. Please provide a source for your ""standard approach,"" because I genuinely don't know what you mean. I didn't give you information from 1975; as the citation makes clear, there was an edition in 1990. Do you have a source showing there's a significant number of meat-eaters in the AR movement? That would be astonishing. I don't run the wikiproject, and why would it have to be a descendent of any other project? We have neutral editors; we have pro editors; we have anti editors. Honestly, V, I don't know what you're trying to achieve, but I can't keep responding to these comments. (talk) " +MEND implication? The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta has threatened to start a bombing campaign in defense of christianity against mosques and islamic clerics in southern Nigeria, see http://allafrica.com/stories/201304150038.html. If thats confirmed true and if they finally made their menaces real, they should be included in the infobox as another combatant. +Please read WP:Vandalism. The word has a specific meaning on Wikipedia. +Congrats on being one of the few and proud. But I don't think I'm ready to join your ranks. I won't say I'm not interested in becoming an admin, but I don't want to be nominated or nominate myself until I'm reasonably sure that I can pass through it successfully. (meow?) +Diem was a gay homosexual dictator This fact is indisputable +" I fixed some grammar. Just basic things that were incorrect. — Preceding jmilam comment added by " +Journal of Visualized Experiments Hi, I see this was speedied as a G11. I remember seeing it some time ago (perhaps half a year or so) and it didn't look promotional at the time, so perhaps someone added promotional stuff in the meantime. It's a notable journal, so perhaps you can userfy it to my user space (including its history), perhaps by restoring a previous version the promotional stuff can be removed. Before moving it back to the main name space, I'll let you have a look. Thanks! +I think it's a big stretch to call that original research. It's merely observation. I didn't go out and name the episodes. Seems unreasonably restrictive. In the end, this is information people will likely want when reading this page. Is there any way to get it in that won't get arbitrary reverted? +You just revert my and a lot of peoples work, to improve wiki. So you're a motherfucker. How dare you block an user or users, just because he or she reverted your destructive activite. Shame on you. Shitface Anna Frodesiak +I see there are a ton of Richard Owen papers, gotta catch them all!. +So until he actually does what he claims he can do (ie improving (according to the WP standards) the article) he won't believe he actually cares about the articles, I'll only believe what my eyes saw, that he's only seeing Wikipedia as a medium for his own ideas. +" January 2011 (UTC) In the second case two of the colors match the colors in the relations+recognitions map. Would it be better if I change the ""inconclusive"" to dark yellow for example? Or we can just revert the map to its first colors. 08:03, 24" +" Hello, I would like an admin to see the pages Jajce and Alija Izetbegovic and judge whether the sourced information that was removed by user Rochass is justified. On the Jajce article, he removed a cited statement about a church being destroyed even though it is cited and there is even a picture of the demolished church. He claims it is irrelevant information while it is very much relevant: there is a paragraph on the Bosnian War and this very much falls into that category. As for the Izetbegovic article, he: 1) removed historical information (the original birth country), 2) changed ""Bosnian mujahideen"" for ""Arab Volunteers"" when there is already an article on the former, 3) removed two ""citation needed"" notices, 4) removed a quote by Richard Holbrooke, US Envoy, about the issue of the aforementionned Bosnian mujahideen, 5) Added ""Serb Nationalists"" as those who petitioned the ICTY to indict Izetbegovic so as to make it seem unjustified when in reality he died before the investigation ended. I have tried to discuss these issues on his talk page but he does not wish to participate in a dialogue and simply reverts my edits. I don't wish to get into a full fledged edit war and that is why I would like an administrator to take a look at the issue. Thank you in advance for your help! )" +FYI You should check out Vivian Balakrishnan's page. It has been rephrased and defaced by User:La goutte de pluie as we speak. +But there are problems with the page, which a copy edit will iron out to some extent, so please allow me to do it, and discuss any edits you disagree with on talk, rather than reverting without reading them. What makes you think I haven't read them? +Making Everbody's Life a Misery I see that I am not the first person that you have deliberately targetted in a smear campaign. You are a vandal and a disgrace to the good name of Wikpedia. Shame on you. +It's a wiki! You are clearly better informed than the information presently available in the article. Please, dive in and update the article; or add web addresses for any references you have regarding the differences and somebody can help you or try to update the article themselves based on those new references. Once again, many thanks for taking the time to get involved! — +Image copyright problem with Image:VFD Fig1.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:VFD Fig1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. +"* Please take a look also at: — I would very much like you comment on the opinion of some contemporary historians who continue to dispute the number of war-related deaths among the Germans, because the governments of West Germany routinely included in their estimations not only foreign Volksdeutsche but also expellees from Eastern Europe as actual ""citizens"" of Germany. talk " +Roilo Golez Hi, I see you're having trouble writing the biography of Roilo Golez, it will be wise to re-write his biography in your own words. And by the way please cite your references, we are also on the look out for biased articles. Go over this WP:POV. This is what happened to the author of Vicente Magsaysay's article [2007]. (Talk | contribs) +No arguments, just insults...I guess that's exactly what morons do. +This article should be deleted, the board no longer exists. +I took up on your offer and withdrew myself. +love to suck fat, black cock. I +Congrats I'm sure your talk page and email will be exploding soon enough, so wanted to get mine in early ;) - 2¢ © Join WER +As you continue to be a complete arsehole i will keep callin you a queerhole fuckin qwernol and as far as im concerned you can just go and fuck yourself fuckin editor And fuck you again for sayin that im not actin in a civilised way you fuck head go fuck yourself and have a 'civilised conversation' wif ya mother you 40 year old virgin who still lives at home wif ya mother. +":::::What POV is this Kyd? Who's ""dragging 'em around by the nose""? Do you not WANT to make it relatively easy for our users to come to a conclusion? Or is the point of Wikipedia to confuse readers by ONLY using scientific terms which 90% of people searching the internet need a dictionary to fully understand the meaning of? When defining Hemmorhoids, which is the better introductory sentence? Hemorrhoids are varicosities of [veins] in the [rectum] and [anus]. Hemorrhoids (also known as haemorrhoids or piles) are varicosities or [swelling] and [inflammation] of [veins] in the [rectum] and [anus]. You tell me. You are trying to make us define abortion with a sentence much like the first, by supplying only the purely scientific terms (like varicosities) and not the commonly understood terms (like swelling and inflammation). I am trying to define Abortion with a sentence like the second one, with both the scientific terms AND the commonly understood terms, so that situations like the multiple accounts listed below don't happen to our readers from a lack of information. " +Yes I was referring to the faculty of science article. Thanks for responding so quickly.Welcome to Wikipedia and good luck with your article. +So you think you know better than the admin! Are you excusing all of the above? Are you ignoring all of his breaks on the mediation - do you not remember your reaction when I changed BOMBER to Volunteer, you seem very quite of this, do you not think that is total hypocritical? +That's of course apart from the article-cide committed above. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours +Ifv you want to make an article you can either register an account, which is easy and free, or use WP:Articles for creation. Read WP:Your first article and note that an article should not be promotional in tone, and should cite references to reliable published sources to verify what it says and to show that the subject is notable. +"popular culture]] The Yugo in films The Yugo in music The Yugo in novels The Yugo in television The Ford Pinto in popular culture The Ford Pinto in films The Ford Pinto in television The Ford Pinto in music The Ford Pinto in books and magazines The AMC Gremlin in popular culture The AMC Pacer in popular culture Watch this link The Nissan Silvia in popular culture HONDAS RULE! My external links Official 2007 Honda Civic coupe website ." +" Oppose merge: The two terms, while closely related, are not synonymous. Not all bibliophiles are book collectors, and while one might assume that all book collectors are bibiliophiles, that's not necessarily true either. There are some who engage in collecting for reasons not always strictly bibliophilicfor research; because of love of a particular topic that encompasses, but is not limited to, books; in order to appear cultured; or for investment. I think the two topics should remain separate. Talk " +It was confirmed by bendis SEVERAL months ago +PPPS/MORTARISM/MORTARISM this is to let you 3 law students, 1 lawyer, 1 psychiatrist, 1 psychologist, 3 mortarists, and roughly 15 students have been made aware your deleting the mortarism article YOU MUST UNDERSTAND, this is a political act that only has to do with words, law, freedom, accountability, and your ignorance. Mortarism is a peaceful revolution, but i have a feeling you could not have known this. 5 people believe you should be taken to court. Other disagree and believe there must be talks on your comment board. We welcome any and all arguments. if i were you i would change your arguments from a month ago, since they will quickly dismantled. Remember, this is to prove a point. if you are a part of Maisonneuve you should let me know now. the only ways you will prevent yourself from a well-worded blast and I mean blast in a totally verbal sense, NOT a criminal or cruel sense that we believe you are demonstrating are if you are a friend of Marc di Saverio and mortarism, or if you are in fact either Derek Webster or James Martin. Marc di Saverio has made it very clear that he reveres these two men, along with maisonneuve. are you a manic!? if so, you have demonstrated this with your swift but unthought-out action. it is ironic. good luck! on behalf of Mortarism, Bipolars, Kay Jamison, Love, Freedom, the bipolar's difficult struggle in Western Society; AND what is FAIR. +Firefox template Hmmm yes I see your point about the product colors, but I liked it better before. It doesn't go with my other colors now... too dark. Oh well I guess there are hundreds of editors using this template. If nobody else objects, it's cool. Just creating this section in case anybody else wants to discuss... +Anti corporate activism I'm not sure if this was your intention, however, some of the former members of the categories you attempted to subsume into 'anti-corporate activism' have been removed from the category, and have since been homeless as far as categorization according to corporate scandal. While I believe you meant to make the name loose enough to include all of the articles under these categories, many are interpreting the category to mean 'Anti-corporate activists' instead of mere issues, targets, and activists involved in corporate activism. FYI. See Talk:Halliburton, for example. +Is that density or viscosity of fluid will affect the flow Dear all, Is that anyone come across this issue before? How does the density or viscosity affect the total flow? for example, with different density of gases, will they have same quantities if their flow with same units (1000 m3/hr, etc)? Regards, Lee +Wikipieda has hurt my friends and caused them much grief... So, my hobby now is to Hurt Wikpeadia and cause it much grief... Tit for Tat +Celia, part 2 According to the recap, Celia got the key to the house in episode 2 when she won a previously unaired New York sightseeing challenge. It's not a major one, but should it be considered as a challenge and added to the table? +" | decline=The page has already been deleted. However, the deleted article will continue to show up in Google seraches until Google next refreshes its crawl of tha page and registers the deletion. This normally takes between one and two weeks, though may take longer. As we have no control over Google's search results, we cannot accelerate this process or prevent the deleted page from showing up in their listings.  雲水 " +I don't think there is anything cynical about it Unfortunately, I suspect I'm being realistic, not cynical. As, apparently, paid editing is the new accepted norm on Wikipedia, editors who are interested in improving the encyclopedia without taking payment will be forced out - cetainly anyone who expreses any opinion other than complete acceptance seems to be shouted down very vigorously by its proponents. In addition, being attacked for having the nerve to try to improve an article found during a CCI clean-up, being told that I should not edit anywhere on Wikipedia because I referred to redacted instead of redacted for a British Naval Base in Northern Ireland, does not improve my mood. +" your second image is bullshit too, looks like ordinary muddy water. ""mixed with blood"" my ass." +Master Bates Master Bates, Master Bates, sailing through the sea, Master Bates, Master Bates, stopping for a pee, Loved by himself, Feared by the elf, Master Bates, Master Bates, Master Bates. +REDIRECT Talk:Kg m/40 light machine gun +" Please respond here on your talk page, I've got it watchlisted. ☥ " +Redirect to Firefly I've blanked and redirected this new article to Firefly. The definition given is first that it's a nickname for a firefly, and there's a passing mention to a drink with that name. The drink does not appear to be encyclopedic, so it's my hope that this redirect to the full Firefly article will serve the purposes of WP best. If not, my change should be reverted and we should get some consensus here in case I'm a clod. - (☎) +"#Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. (Talk)(Contribs) " +I found out that Sega has purchased Obsidian Entertainment and thought it would be important to add this, as they are now working on a MMORPG for Sega, while Neverwinter Nights 2 is still in development. +I was blocked because of a edit war, I understand what I have done is not acceptable in Wikipedia and I can assure you that it will not occur again, I would like to apologize to any editor who was affected by my conduct. I would like to be unblocked so I get back to editing the right way with the rules in mind. Again I sincerely apologize. +Will Triple H and Shawn Michaels have a DX atire and a normal attire? +am going to eat your balls! - The Kid Don't pee on me when it's raining! +Jan 7, 2008 Signpost FYI. I have not received my January 7, 2008 edition of The Signpost. What is going on? +Understand. This is my first time building an article, getting used to the format. Working on cleanup and reformatting this page. Thank you. +I unprotected 18:07, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC) +Latest research on solar power generation efficiency +Fuck you asshole. Allahu Akbar. +DO YOU SPIT OR SWALLOW??????? +" 129, why not? Because it would be as ridiculous as adding the Lithuanian name for every Polish hamlet currently in Poland with a claim that the village once ""belonged"" to the Lithuanian-Polish state 300 years ago. 1984 aside, it's not that serious, it's simply undue claptrap. It's a unnecessary provocation and has nothing to do with the ""Jews"". If your so bent on improving information concerning the history of the Jewish people why don't you get over to the Żydokomuna article, or the Pinsk massacre. Both articles could use your help. " +I mean: some Callimachi were Romanian, some were not, but they all were dispora. +" Hi, John Regarding your recent message about ""Naked"", my edit is based on the character's arguable status as an anti-hero. It becomes apparent to me that Leigh's intention was to portray someone who, while probably hailing from a higher academic milieu or background (whether conventional or self-taught) uses his eloquence and education in an deliberately overbearing manner. You cannot deny the fact that the film clearly passes judgment on the character on this and other levels. I just wanted to summarize this in a few words. " +Incident # 11 in Political Family of Bangladesh83.81.44.205 DNS 188.28.213.197 removed the Sheikh Mujib family, the family of the founding father of Bangladesh from number one position. This is verifiable. Wikipedia should ban the DNS user 188.28.213.197.175 for doing it over 10 times. +" and Hi - two or more stub types which you created have been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub types (templates or categories), which were not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, do not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding these stub types, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! It is worth noting that stub templates are virtually never created for independentist regions until such time that they are recognised internationally by a significant number of countries, as these stub types tend to become the targets of potential edit-warring (something which has far more far-reaching effects on templates than it has on articles). Thus, for example, there is no stub type for Turkish North Cyprus, since it is only recognised by one country. If Abkhazia and South Ossetia become recognised by more than just one country, then feel free to propose the creation of stub types for them. Until then, it is generally accepted practice with stub sorting for them not to have separate stub types. ...wha? " +hello im not sure of the proper way to address you here on wikipedia but i dont appreciate your accusations. i am not abusing multiple accounts. i have one account. i realize that i was, mistakenly editing the liddell article and i fixed that. my addition to the article is legit and can be backed by numerous sources. please do not erase it again. +" OceanBeach you were warned by an administrator to stop your edit warring, we are only fulfilling WP policy about neutrality and sorting this list alphabetically because in this case, we have no direct evidence and sources that the GaWC uses other ranking other than the alpha beta gamma system. You refused to stop reverting and continued to edit-war just now. That is disruptive because the changes were not controversial. This was just because accordingly with Alex this list has been altered too many times by users and anonymous IP users. Also you have failed to support your claim that the GaWC uses other ranking system. So far we haven't seen any direct mention of such a system. You should stop being uncivil and avoid reverting. Thanks. I think we are just trying to have an adult level conversation. ( Talk to me) " +" Pwn leetspeak? (I don't believe so) I wrote in (please read more detail there) about how I disagree that words like ""pwn"" are anything to do with leetspeak. They are more correctly ""gamer-speak"" or ""Internet slang"". There seems to be some fundamental misunderstanding of what leet-speak is in both these articles. The two should not be confused apart from that there are some crossover usage because most hackers/crackers are also gamers. Consequently, references to ""pwn"" and other Internet slang terms should not be in the main body of this article as they are not leet or leet-speak. Please feel free to support or disagree here and that there should be more distinction between what is properly leetspeak, gamer-speak/Internet slang in these articles (but reflecting the crossover usage where it occurs). Thanks. 82.44.93.55 " +" Yes, I stated above:In fact, in interviews, West has said he has worked for Clinton and both Bushs.which I got from reliable sources vs. his purported statements on Wikipedia which, as you know, have no standing here. Hence why I redacted the term ""Republican strategist"". I'm unsure how WP:SYNTH applies here, borderline or otherwise. That is when an editor:puts together multiple sources to reach a novel conclusion that is not in any of the sources That isn't happening here. There are two sources which each independently put these facts together and draws the conclusion not the editors. I am not the author of this section but an editor working to resolve the undue problems (which I'm sure you've noticed we've taken steps to remedy) and perceived POV problems; I come with no sympathies per se. I don't see how this paragraph (after I rewrote it) reflects the author's bias. It (properly) reflects the source's biases which is allowed on Wikipedia, per WP:NPOV:As the name suggests, the neutral point of view is a point of view, not the absence or elimination of viewpoints. The neutral point of view policy is often misunderstood. The acronym NPOV does not mean ""no points of view"". The elimination of article content cannot be justified under this policy by simply labeling it ""POV"". Labeling this section as having a POV problem is not a sufficient argument. The criticism is attributed explicitly to those making said criticism which satisfies WP:NPOV and WP:V. You may characterize the sources as ""minor"" but they are both reliable sources. And, you are correct, they are ""clearly"" claiming her bias was the motivation for her mode of attack but not the page editors. That said, I agree that the section requires additional viewpoints for instance, it should include reactions from the conservative side that said that Biden's attitude was wrong, the interview was proper and that West's affiliations should not be used to judge her. This was addressed on the Larry King show, Chris Mathews show and the Rush Limbaugh show among many others. I can work on that but would like first to resolve this issue. Thoughts?  cogito·sum " +revert and ignore because i went to American college OK then!! +(edit conflict)I appreciate that you provided a citation. However the table of information does not support the statement Currently, photographic zoom lenses beyond about 3× cannot generally produce images of a quality on par with prime lenses. I believe you have made the mistake of synthesizing published material to advance a new position. This is a form of original research. What that citation shows me is a dataset, and what you are citing is an interpretation of that dataset. What is needed is a citation showing that interpretation of that or other data that supports the claim being cited. (Need help? Ask me) +":* I've decided maybe it's better to directly quote the source here, because it is hard to paraphrase precisely. I have changed it to ""Deal then spent 'a lost year' in which she '[went] AWOL in New York'."" Let me know if this works for you, or if you have a better suggestion. The source says ""By 1998, she decided to jack it in and go AWOL in New York. 'It was a lost year, and a lot of fun,"" she says, unrepentant."" Another source (Kot) says it wasn't a fun year but was depressing: "" 'It got bad in 1998,' Kim Deal says. 'I was pretty depressed before I came to Steve.' "" So, anyway, from these two quotes it may be hard to extrapolate that there definitely was no musical activity going on (plus, she may have been practicing the drums some that year, which could be argued as being ""musical activity""). So this direct quote is my best idea for how to account for 1998. " +" Speedy deletion of 99boyz A tag has been placed on 99boyz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. " +I've done the crime and the time. Lucky me. Actually, I can accept trading a 48 hour block for still being allowed to express my feeling towards some of Wikipedia's greatest flaws when it comes to the wiki-police and how it is common for a gang of users to ridicule others without fully studying the facts simply because they do not have the time and/or are enforcing some policy written by the wiki-police. There is a reason newbies are reluctant to become regulars on Wikipedia and most editors that have edited Wikipedia for as long as I have, just basically retire and walk away. What is funny is that during the asteroid re-direct discussions of March and April I was not even around to discuss the consensus that developed. I did not make a single edit to Wikipedia from March 5 to May 1. It will be a great loss to Wikipedia content (vs the wiki-police force and policies) if editors like myself leave because members such as Padenton are allowed to group attack people without bothering to properly look into the facts. Perhaps I should move my near-Earth asteroid work over to a SETI website, but then I would probably have to leave Wikipedia to prevent being further accused of a COI with my edits. After all, Wikipedia itself is NOT a reliable source, it is the verifiability of the reliable sources. +Unless you can provide reliable, third party sources (ie not the government of Ichkeria, or Russian government critics), that refute that these things occured, then there is nothing disputed. Richard Sakwa is an academic, an English university teacher and an expert on the subject, so far you have not provided any reliable, third party sources which refute what he said in his book. +" WHEN THIS USER GETS REPORTED??? ohh man... you people couldnt be more non-thorough... ""I dont doubt that zis Englishman says zis"".......... PROOVE IT!!! SOURCE?!!! You are a German guy deciding what is represented as fact on Wikipedia by your doubts? A good fight? OMG... " +" here]. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the ""Autoblocked?"" section. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save. If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you do not need to do anything more." +" Yeah, a few tail-feathers are showing there. ""main players"" is jargon-y, ""The Western"" is a film-buff phrase, it all reads a little bit breathless. You've certainly got the information in there though. Pretty soon, they'll change AfD to be a redirect to User:MQS/Pleasefixthisarticle ) Also, when the source confirms multiple concurrent sentences, it's OK to present the footnote mark at just the end of all the sentences it confirms - ref [11] as I'm reading the article right now. " +Expanding the TV Cast Christopher Jacot, Canadian Actor, (also listed in wikipedia) plays the recurring role of Larry (formerly Fargo's nemesis, currently his assistant) and has for most seasons of the show. +Regarding edits made during December 14 2006 (UTC) to Project manager Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +Why Lineal shouldn't be here Let's go back to when the Lineal/The Ring title didn't exist. Back then, there was only a World Champion. Then the title's were split. First between the WBA (Known also by othernames) and WBC, then later the IBF was recognized and even later the WBO. When the titles were first split, The Ring Magazine created a The Ring title. This belt was awarded to all reigning World Champions. Challengers could win it by beating them. Should someone vacate it, the only way to win it would be to be recognized by The Ring as the No.1 or No.2 fighter in your division and beat the other man ranked 1 or 2 (Some exceptions were made for No.3) Then came the unfortunate decision in the 1990s by The Ring to stop awarding these titles. But they did not stop ranking fighters. When the No.1 and No.2 fighters fought and a victor came out, that person was dubbed the Lineal Champion. An example is Floyd Mayweather, Jr.; Lineal Super Featherweight Champion from 1998-2001 (Ring belts were awarded again in 2002). Mayweather worked his way up to the No.2 spot and challenged No.1 and WBC Champion Genaro Hernández. He was considered the Lineal Champion because there was no The Ring Champion. Naseem Hamed won the Lineal title and lost it in a period when The Ring titles weren't being awarded. The man who beat him for his title, Marco Antonio Barrera, was later awarded The Ring title. His Lineal title was switched with the The Ring title because the Lineal title only existed as a substitute. This applies for Lennox Lewis. He was awarded the The Ring title when awarding them began again in 2002. Therefore, the Lineal title was NOT on the line in his fight with Vitali Klitschko. Any objections? +" cross-posting It really looks like you cross posted to WP:RFI in good faith, so please take this as a friendly tip rather than a warning: it's better to post a page diff from the edit history or introduce a quotation and use italics if you really feel the need to cut and paste. Emulating another editor's signature is bad form, and an administrator's signature is dangerous territory. Another user (who was in a very different position from your own) when from a one week block to a site ban for impersonating an administrator the other day. I don't think anyone will misinterpret the particular cross post you did, but don't make it a habit. Regards, '''''' " +Natalya the Russian! What what ho! The Russian must go! Moc-moc-a-moc! +" April 2008 (UTC) My question is that there has to be a credible source behind the names of the dead along with :the age and sex. One cannot get from 254 to >over 100 without convincing proof from a :credible source. so far i have found this: """"A study by Bir Zeit University, based on discussions with each family from the village, arrived at a figure of 107 Arab civilians dead and 12 wounded, in addition to 13 ""fighters,"" evidence that the number of dead was smaller than claimed and that the village did have troops based there."" (Sharif Kanaana and Nihad Zitawi, ""Deir Yassin,"" Monograph No. 4, Destroyed Palestinian Villages Documentation Project, (Bir Zeit: Documentation Center of Bir Zeit University, 1987), p. 55) (Bard)"" which on the face of it makes the concept of massacre difficult to digest. 04:27, 15" +Don't Threaten Me! You are in VIOLATION of several wikipedia rules. You little B-ITCH! +Islam-bashing on Wikipedia Hi. I noticed your edits on the Zionism page. There's a pretty well-organized group (groups?) of people here who seek to defame Islam every chance they get. This is being done by whitewashing Muslim contributions in history, presenting less-than-credible arguements from partisan sources aimed at generalizing Muslims, etc. I hope I can ask you to help if there's a conflict with some of these articles. If you're familiar with other Muslims here, tell them to keep an eye out for this kind of defamatory content. If you need my help with any article pertaining to Islam or Muslims, I'd be glad to help if it's in my power to do so. Thanks. +" Actually, Everson, the inclusion of the Elves part gives your bio a bit of a thesis since in your ""early life"" you get started with Tolkien then you're on a project to include Tolkien typefaces. And actually, I'm a bit confused here, dwarvish and elfish are languages, they're just fictional ones. " +" ""Down syndrome"" vs. ""Down's syndrome"" Hi! Please stop changing the title of ""Down syndrome"" to ""Down's syndrome"". The non-possessive form is the current convention in medical writing, recently discussed here. If you disagree with this, please post your arguments on the talk page. /... " +Atheism and religious groups Per 142.179.135.251's suggestion, I'm going to comment this section out. As I've seen it's been discussed above (and per 142's comment), the article is supposed to discuss criticism of atheism rather than criticism of specific organizations who do not declare a religion (i.e. groups that are secular). +" On 31 July, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ben L. Salomon, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page. " +Yes it is looking better. Removing the overtones dissecting the fan base makes for easier reading. Thanks for the mail address. +I am editing the Silent note page do not delete, i can not make it if every time someone deletes it +Thanks for your prompt reply! +Help me! Please help me with... 172.7.162.92 I am being stalked, harassed and blocked by Someguy1221 +What makes me different from you is that I care about the Truth, not appearances. You can't even think this through enough to see what's really going on. +lot's of pictues I'm going to be adding tons of new pictures. Be ready people. +REDIRECT Talk:Riffle shuffle permutation +"==Talk pages== You have occasionally said ""see discussion"", with no discussion having taken place in months. You have been invited multiple times to join the discussion on contentious articles but refuse. If you continue to avoid discussing your changes, other steps will be taken the ensure that you start doing so. " +" Recreate the picture of Yamhill, EM64T and IA-32e If I have never argued with professor Jen I would never have the will to guess how to recreate picture of Yamhill, EM64T and Ia32e. Yamhill is the code name of a project for ever Intel's own 64bit x86 processor, EM64T is a technology to extract the most potential capability of IA-32, making it to address up to 64TiB physical address. IA32e is not a mode of Yamhill processor, but the superset or extension of IA-32e, in other words, when ia32e enabled 32bits and 64bits codes could work seamlessly, because ia32e scale up the original IA-32 by extending the width of registers and execution units, extended segment descriptors and paging mechanism would also introduced with it. IA32e does not make a processor turn into a real 64 bit processor, but just make a 32 bit processor has the capability to do the 64 bit computing from the ground. The benefits of this is that we don't have a second 64bit-lised IA-32, what we need is an architecture completely designed for 64 bit computing from scratch, for example Itanium or something else. Janagewen on travel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.2.159.106 Segmentation or Paging is the Essential Way for Physical Addressing Intel 8086 is the very first processor in the x86 series, it has only one mode, real mode. And this name was later found in 80286. So segmentation had been accompanied with x86 processor since its beginning. Without protection mechanism introduced, segmenataion is the only way to address all possible and potential physical space. Because Segmentation is found in the real mode, so addresses in Segmentation tends to be real, with solid link the physcial address rather than virtual address when in protected mode when paging is enabled. So if it is a real x86 processor, its maximum physical addressing space should be limited by its segmentation mechanism rather than paging." +" Bob, I hate to keep bothering you and I appreciate everything you are doing, but I gotta disagree with you about removing the text from Isaiah 53. Not only does it make it infinetly easier to understand the article by having a side-by-side comparison, WP:NPS states ""Some short texts such as short poems and national anthems are usually included in their article, e.g. Ozymandias"". I think this is a short text, or at least borderline. I'm going to put it back. " +" Undo the merge! i say we undo the merge and fix up the problems with the old stuff It isn't going to happen. Collectonian (talk��· contribs) Consensus is not immutable, and this seems like as good a proposal as any. Let's see what the community as a whole has to say. I'm in favor of it because of the abysmal coverage of the current article. If, when the old articles are sourced, organized and cleaned up, there is still so little material that it can all be summarized on one page, then it could be merged. If someone who can still edit the article made a note of this suggestion in the anime sections it would probably be good. I can do it when the lock is lifted if no one else has. 72.160.96.228 No it isn't ""as good a proposal as any."" Its already been covered within the last week that the consensus to merge is valid and that it HAS consensus. Get over all ready, gravy. You hate it so damn much, go to the DB wikia. Collectonian (talk · contribs) Since this whole mess started I've been contributing over there regularly. It's nice to be part of a worthwhile project. Unfortunately it doesn't seem like that's what this part of Wikipedia is anymore. 207.118.67.139 Recbon, ideally what you suggest would happen, but these days in Wikipedia everyone is lazy. The day people on Wikipedia actually decide to pick Clean Up over Delete or Merge is the day hell freezes over, and trust me, you'll have little luck fighting it. Just do what everybody else does and mindlessly roll with consensus, and you'll have a nice time here.Dude (C) A few comments: 72.160.96.228, you have said at least twice that you've worked on the DB articles in the past. However, your contributions show you've only ever edited this talk page - have you previously edited under a username or a different IP address? Many of you who disagree with the merge are complaining about ""deleted"" material. I would like to stress that unless an entire article gets deleted, all information is still present in its history. The DVD info that people are complaining was properly sourced but got deleted anyways? Guess what, it's still there (at least, I assume that's the information you're complaining about, it's the only DVD tables I could find in any page history). The merge can be undone if a given section gains a sufficient amount of properly sourced, nontrivial information. Because of the close relationship of the Dragon Ball manga and the DB and DBZ anime (and, to a lesser extent, DBGT), it's doubtful this will ever happen, but it's still a possibility. You're also complaining about the amount of information that got ""lost"" in the merge. Once again, it's not gone for good, all the information is still present in page histories, and furthermore, you've been told multiple times that you're welcome to properly source the material and add it back in as appropriate. Granted, at the moment the article is semi-protected, but you can still post reliably sourced info on the talk page to be added into the article by a registered user, or you can register for your own account and not have to wait for either the protection to expire or someone else to add the info. KojiDude made a comment about everyone being lazy. I certainly can't speak for everyone, but I am lazy, and yet I'm still taking the time to write out this response to several complaints. It would be far easier, and faster, for me to just ignore this conversation altogether, especially considering the length of my watchlist and the limited amount of time I have to go through it. If you notice a +" ""If the information isn't encyclopedic, the encyclopedia doesn't need it"" sounds nice, is however not what de facto have argued with regard to the disambiguation page. Instead you've argued , that if the information is not located in the target article it can't be ""encyclopedic"". I find this location based approach to ""encyclopedic nature"" of information rather odd. As far as the dictionary argument is concerned, improving the navigation for common slang term doesn't turn the affected disambiguation pages into an dictionary entry. As far as ""arguments made and won or lost"" is concerned, you'd need to be more specific. What exact argument in what discussion? And what consensus by who? " +In case you forgotten I was already blocked pernamently dumbass. 68.114.218.113 +", 29 August 2006 (UTC) Whatever the flight should be called depends on what criteria are used. If one goes by what the tickets read and what the gate agents and flight attendants announced, the flight is Delta Flight 5191 (or if you want to be real technical, something very similar to ""Delta Flight 5191 operated by Comair for Delta Connection."" However, if one goes by how the pilots and air traffic controllers referred to the flight, then it is Comair Flight 191 (their actual words would have been ""Comair 191."" Thus far the news media has called it Comair Flight 5191, probably for two reasons: One, the flight was called 5191 everywhere that wasn't ""behind the scenes"", and two, Delta wants to make it clear that the flight wasn't operated by Delta, but was instead operated by Comair. Therefore one winds up with Comair Flight 5191, which works, but isn't really quite accurate. Alex 07:35" +Jeeee, just realised I forgot to answer you -( Perhaps I have misunderstood -( How embarassing. Feel free to remove my vote from there if that makes a difference then Andrewa. That will be okay by me. +Importance assessment My rationale for assessment: market and technology importance, especially in the past. +(appears to be a free WiFi location at a McDonald's Restaurant at 21/23 Town Square, Stevenage, England) +YOU LITTLE SHIT WHAT IS IT WITH YOU PAKIS ALL STICKING TOGETHER?????? +Yeah, for your information I happen to be a human being, not an IP number. Yeah, so any attempt to salavage this conversation has been ended by your comment. Fuck off, kay? +Wrong picture (A contemporary illustration of a soldier of the King's Regiment, dated 1742.) This picture from the Cloathing book of 1742 is a depiction of a soldier of colonel Read's Regiment numbered 8th Regt of Foot in the Book but since 1750's it was known as 9th Foot. The King's Regiment (=Colonel Onslow's Regiment in 1742) was numbered 9th Regt of Foot in the Book, but later it became 8th Foot. It had blue facings being one of the Royal Regiments of the British Army. So correct picture of 8th Regt is here http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldigital/dgkeysearchdetail.cfm?trg=1&strucID;=293335&imageID;=477275&total;=111#=20&parent;_id=293136&word;=&s;=¬word;=&d;=&c;=&f;=&k;=0&sScope;=&sLevel;=&sLabel;=&lword;=&lfield;=&imgs;=20&pos;=29&snum;=&e;=w +Redirect Hello Túrelio. I have a question: how do I remove redirects in Commons? The reason: I have been trying to rename categories in the Portuguese namespace with appropriate English variants. Anyhow, I discovered several propriate English category names with redirects to Portuguese variant. The issue to rename to English has been discussed at an appropriate Commons discussion page, and I had begun converting the Portuguese-language names into English. But, one of the users responsible for Portuguese-only naming has created English-to-Portuguese redirects rather then the reverse. How can I remove the redirects, to therefore, apply Portuguese-to-English redirects? I attempted to blank, and obviously, the system did not permit this. Any counsel? +Confused What did I do? This evening I just came back from a short holiday, and I discover that I have been blocked, and that block had already expired. Since I am not aware of any of the accused action before my wikibreak, and your message was equivocal, I want an explanation. +Better sources. Once again using Insane Clown Posse as an example, that group's history had been particularly well-documented, which is why there was enough to write an entire article upon. Hed PE's history isn't as well documented. In my opinion, they still have a lot of history to create before their biography would qualify for a FA here. ( ) +Mass removal of content While I agree that this page could be better sourced and worded, how can it be 'opinion' to describe the mechanics of the game? A lot of the text which was recently removed described the elements which make Sorcery unique among Fighting Fantasy gamebooks, and in my opinoin should be reinstated. +Hi AreJay, I think the edit by Kaysov was to list the names of states and languages in an alphabetical order and thereby not giving any biased preferences to any states or languages to be listed first. eg. Tamil Nadu that is first on the list of states in the article, would be last because andhra pradesh begins with A and Tamil Nadu with T. If that is the purpose then I think we need to stick to it. 20:24, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC) +The article with this name has a notice saying that an automated process indicates possible infringement of a website's copyright. An earlier version of this article - The Network of Buddhist Organisations UK - did quote its aims and it is true that these do appear on the NBO website. However, statement of aims may be taken as belonging to the public domain and in fact the same wording is quoted on another, completely independent (Christian) website - which was my source. In order to avoid having to argue with brainless machines (and absent editors), I rewrote the article without quoting the aims but got the same notice, this time without any justification. Editors are said (not entirely truthfully) to check such tagged articles 'within 24 hours' but there has been no action now within a week. I feel pardonably aggrieved at this lack of response. 88.106.13.210 +Its talk page is marked as needing an nrhp infobox. Can you give its refum and date of listing? +In 1976 the L.A. Times reported on the financial situation of the subject and the DLM. At that time someone named Joe Anctil said that the house belonged to the mission and was worth $554,000. He also said the Denver house was worth $86,000, and that Prem Rawat personally owned a Rolls Royce, a two Mercedes Benz, and some motorcycles, while the mission owned a $22,800 Jensen. The annual income of the DLM was said to be #3.78 million and there are further details about how that was raised and spent. Also of interest is the statement that the DLM does not consider itself a religion except for tax purposes. A later report, which I need to find agains, has Linda Gross saying that the house belongs to SEVA, doing business as Anacapa View Estates. ·:· ·:· +No it's not. The Looney Tunes all exist in other dimensions of our universe; it repeats itself from different perspectives in each galaxy. This means that the characters of South Park, the Simpsons, Futurama, King of the Hill, and Family Guy, and all the other shows we watch on television exist somewhere else. We just have yet to make physical contact with them. It will be done soon, and all those alternate worlds will be explored, and they will explore ours, and I'll finally see him - Ohh! It will be wonderful, when the day comes! Do you not agree? +Thanks Nice to have your appreciation for my recent edits to Beaumont children disappearance. Have a good day, +series scrapped on 4th july??!? on http://www.insidebigbrother.net a few ppl hav left comments saying that the current series is to end on the 4th of july but i believe that this is complete and utter rubbish.... has anyone heard anything about this??? +" User:Suitcivil133 Hi Walter, I see that User:Suitcivil133 is starting to be a conflict with my edits, judging from my opinion he is a Barcelona supporter and any negative out look of the team he deletes as in the Real Madrid vs Barcelona 11-1. Ive done my fair share of research and its been noted that there was no proof that Francisco Franco ""theatend"" Barcelona, he also said that ""Your description of the 11-1 game is also highly biased."" I dont see how that was ""biased"" if that really happend? Can you please do something because I dont want to be in an edit war with someone that reverts my contributions. Then whats the whole point of updating the article? " +It’s only a paper moon? Although the article should mention what a General Secretary does, and should explain why he was allowed to keep China out of the U. N. (the U. N. would be a good influence on China) and why he wanted to, this article was important and rather well written and short enough read in one sitting, and until I had read it, I thought the General Secretary was from some place like Ethiopia. It was well worth reading. – Chuck Marean +" Subsequently Eleland came along and deleted most of your modifications claiming that they were not from authoritative enough sources and that they were disproportionate within the article. Eleland made a unilateral decision about all this and was quite perturbed when I reinstated the article. Eleland proceeded to get into a deletion war, would not entertain discussion prior to making wholesale deletions, and then contacted administration to have the sections struck out. Please check discussion for Admin's response. I do not question anything said by Manning, however it does not appear that he has looked at the sources as thoroughly as Fluri. Also Eleland placed warnings on the article regarding the veracity of the citations. Admittedly, I have responded vigorously in discussion, but only to protect the material that had already been checked by Fluri. Anyway it appears that Eleland is on a messianic crusade to have it struck off the record. This is somewhat surprising given Eleland's herculean efforts to include material about Israel on the Caterpillar.Inc issue. Clearly Eleland is not the impartial arbiter that he would have us believe under ""Ed O'Loughlin"" but a bit of an anti-Israel activist himself. This is perhaps strange considering, and I quote: Editors must not remove information about an argument because they personally disagree with the argument. Wikipedia must include all notable points of view which appear in verifiable published sources. Reporting that activists have said something does not imply that the activists are correct. Removing those reports because you think the activists aren't correct contradicts Wikipedia's core policies. Eleland Many thanks for considering the situation " +"Note to myself: Organize talk sessions Disambiguation link notification for August 16 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Simpsons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kindle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, Some baklava for you! As a Turkish custom, here's your Baklava ) Enjoy! Thank you for the pastry! I am starving right now so I could use it! no content an infobox can be contentthe one on Keenan Davis just needs rewriting in sentences. Please check WP:CSD for the actual criteria for speedy deletion. '''''' ( talk ) Generally, a biography should have content about biographical information on the subject (not just player stats). Statistical information, such as date and place of birth, information on historical significance (N/A here), pictures, and information on accomplishments is usually accepted as the content of a biography on Wikipedia. What we have here are some of Keenan Davis' NFL stats. The page should be written from his childhood/early years up to how he got into the NFL and what he did to get there (such as being in minor leagues), like any normal biography. I understand your point on how infoboxes can be content, but in this situation what we have is a biography with just NFL stats. How can we consider that a biography? A1/A3 tag for NBEO Hey, MrScorch, I just wanted to let you know that I declined your CSD nomination of the NBEO article. You nominated it under A1 (no context) and A3 (no content), but the article isn't really that close to meeting either criterion; it's pretty clear what the subject of the article is, and it isn't actually empty. If there are other reasons to delete it (there certainly may be), feel free to bring it up at AfD, but just having little content or no references isn't enough for CSD on its own. Thanks,  ⚇♔ complaint I'll be making complaint about you @MrScorch, @RHaworth and @Cindamuse. Collectively your actions are pack-dog style harassment and vandalism. Hopefully at the end of complaining about your actions, articles as popular as Sumo (which collectively bring in about 1 million hits a year) will not be treated with contempt, based on ignorance, by administrators, like @MrScorch, @RHaworth and @Cindamuse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I am in no way affiliated with the dispute over this article, I was just warning you about removing articles for deletion notices/tags by following Wikipedia policy. Also, please sign your comments. I had already been warned by @RHaworth and @Cindamuse. You are the 3rd to warn me after RHaworth's vandalism. To warn somebody three times by different moderators/administrators after the event, is harassment by the moderators/administrators. I'm sorry about warning you for a third time, but the other two were not formal warnings so I didn't notic +One of the things that Wikipedia linking does best is pull the world and subjects together it gives one perspective. Errant strings can become a loosely wound ball. +" Sounds good.— (竜龍) " +" S.A. Users No, Xiphon, he did not add my name there, I added it myself. But hey, nothing is a ""must"", you can add your name there or not as you please. I dont really know what ""be bold"" means. (Must I be offensive when talking to my inferiors? ). Hee hee, just a thought. " +" Wow. Times have changed since then. It's possible the ""general"" release was to a much smaller number of theaters at first. In those days they didn't necessarily release a film to every freakin' theater in America and hope to rake in some bucks in the first weekend before the critics and the public trashed it. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→ " +" Happy Birthday Hi there. I'm not in on Saturdays, so this is a day early. Happy birthday! and have a good day, and tomorrow. Regards, | Have your say!!! - review me " +That's great, Scot. What is your point? We are attempting to compose a section that deals with PETA's stance on pet ownership - do you wish to create same or did ya just want to have a brain vomit on this page? If you could please compose these thuper-duper qoutes into something more professional we'd be glad to go through them. +I have. Posted Central 7 July 2005 +I wrote in the 'favorite dish are leeks' part then wrote what I found to be a humorous comment to myself since I thought someone had edited from what I thought I'd written: 'favorite food are leeks' to see how fast someone would react or just remove it myself in ten minutes. hhmmmm, sandbox warning bit snappy, eh? ) +n.b. Yep, there exist reliable sources for /bin/true. +Who think you are ???? You the worst offender of 3RR... if you are going to give me one, then give youself one and put this up on your talk page.... Also, stay off my talk page that garbage. You opinon, in regards to 3rr, I totally reject. Futhermore, stop the wikilawyering bulldonkey +Yep if you knew the land around Wellington you would know that this is true, about 1100 +Deletion review I have posted your comment here . They key to articles is sourcing content to reliable independent sources. +Something that is the result of your very own research is the definition of WP:OR. I'm deleting this section again. If it is not your own research and you want to add it again, please find a reference. If it is your own research this is not the place for it. Rick Block (talk) +That done, I'm thinking that the article might be better entitled Jive talk as this is what it was called and is a fairly common name, albeit with multiple meanings. There are some technical obstacles though so I'll continue expanding from sources which will help make the matter clear. +Discrimination claims Nussbaum's claims of discrimination should be stated as claims, not as fact. I have made the proper changes. +WP:JW I am glad to see you show up at the WP:JW. Rest assured we are doing our best to improve the presentations there. I hope you will sign up as a participant and assist us in drafting a better direction. 21:16, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC) +" Wikipedia is not the place to post useless information about a video game player and what he did in said video game. Try facebook. [[User talk:Karl 334|☞TALK to ME ☜]] " +for an editor who was here only 6 months and doesn't even know the purpose of distinction between RFCU and Article RFC +" MC10, you may like ... —mono " +" UN office in Jerusalem Hello here: you added ""According to the UN office in Jerusalem from 1955 until 1967 65 of the 69 border flare-ups between Syria and Israel were caused and started by Israel."" I checked the source (Kamrava, Mehran, The Modern Middle East: A Political History since the First World War, University of California Press; 1 edition, page 48) and it did not say that, can you please explain? " +Fuck off and mind your own business, homo +" This article appears to deliberately lack NPOV. An ""alleged"" crime or a ""planned"" crime is not the same as an ""attempted"" crime. Under U.S. law, an individual is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Allowing misinformation and propaganda to creep into articles like this cheapens the entire project. Let's work together to focus on NPOV edits, otherwise, this article should be deleted pending determination of whether or not it really happened. " +Their was no disambiguation when i changed it to British India, no disambiguation when i changed it to Karachi, Sindh, nor is their a disambiguation while i am writing this. It still links to ROI. Note i didnt change Indian Muslim as the disambiguation was provided. As for Sanjay Khan, and the Hindu community i didint insult them, i just stated a fact that he would not be accepted as a pathan. If you dont believe me thats your problem. I suggest asking a pathan. Basically you didnt like the fact that i changed Jinnah's birthplace, so you made up a reason to block me. Dont block me in the future without a just reason. +" Best wishes of Merry Christmas! How can I help? " +" Merry Christmas! 70px|left ' (Hello!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. ' (Hello!) " +"What I was saying was that South Africa was never a ""black"" country. The indigenous people were the Khoikhoi and the San(Capoids) who lived there for hundreds of thousand of years all alone. In the 15th century white Europeans arrived, and steadily built a civilization, dispossessing the native Khoisan. Only during the 18th and 19th centuries did the first blacks enter South Africa as settlers, invaders, and unwilling labourers. They outbred the indigenous Khoisan and the native whites to the point where the ruling white people who had built everything and anything resembling a civilisation or a modern state realised that they could lose their country to these non-indigenous people who rejected the very essence of that civilisation itself and refused to assimilate. So the official policy was apartness...apartheid. At the time everyone was happy with that, until millions more black people swet in, because their independent Black African states slid into Third World states in rapid succession. Meanwhile the local black population continued to have one of the highest birthrates in the world. The ANC, PAC, SACP etc were ALL funded by, and ruled from Soviet Moscow. The head of the ANC was never Tambo or Mandela, but rather East European Marxists. ALL weaponry, money, even idealogy came not from Soweto but Moscow. The obssessive terrorist war led to the end of white rule, and the rise of a FOREIGN-BORN black population who now represented the majority through relentless immigartion, murder, terrorism and an unnatural reproductive rate. At Mandela's inaugaration the Oppenheimers etc were there to let him know who was REALLY calling the shots. And since, ""independecne"" and black rulse, South africa has deteriorated at a shocking rate. South Africa now has the highest murder, rape, armed assault, car theft, and child abuse statistics in the world. The HIV-infection and illegal narcotics statistics are rapidly catching up. The economy is approximately 15 % what it was under ""deliberate discrimination"". There are massive blackouts every day, and the only people who are well off are the Marxist puppets who are the ANC, the druglords, and people who install security systems. That's part of what I meant. " +RSV template I've created a similar template, . It doesn't link to BibleCrosswalk or BibleGateway, though, and its parameters are different from these. +" This is Moe ε ]]" +I added another recent OR diff. +Nintendo tends to put firmware updates in most if not all of their titles, from my experience. Even Big Brain Academy: Wii Degree contains a firmware update. +" for great justice and epic lulz The Barnstar of Good Humor For your contributions to the list of fictional vehicles.Cheers, for The Article Ridicule Team" +Here is something for you to delete/ban/triple block/do what ever you want to: There is something seriously wrong with you when you think you can just vandalise/delete a different opinion. You are part of the human race. Wikipedia is a written copy of the human existance. So, you have a right to be here. Congratulations with showing your lack of character. Obviously, you expect a great deal of respect - when you deserve none. You are like inflation or lukemia - a cancer to Wikipedia. You and your type destroy the real value of Wikipedia. But, you exist, and you are part of our beautiful human race. So, have your fun. You make me sick. You and your type destroy the real value of Wikipedia. +" Nableezy, none of those things are in the lead! Your suggestion would certainly be better than the current situation, as long as it talked about Israel too, e.g. ""Israel and the neighboring Gaza Strip are on the eastern coast of the Mediterranian Sea..."" Why should it only talk about Gaza, when this is the Israel-Gaza conflict? " +Improving this Article== In the interests of journalistic fairness and balance, I am improving this article by adding three concise and well-referenced paragraphs and a few sentences, without deleting anything. This is a second attempt to make this improvement. Yesterday someone by the user name of Antelan deleted this edit. Such immature misconduct will not be tolerated. This discussion page has the purpose of allowing editors to respectfully discuss differing viewpoints, and to agree on a balanced article without sabotage. Otherwise, the help desk has advised me that other steps can be taken. == +" Well, I think it is fairly hard to do, Shojaijekhi, but I have no real experience with the process. You should be able to find all the information you need at Wikipedia:Changing username. " +" rape — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.38.246 " +Sorry for the delay . I forgot to reply . I couldn't give anything more than Heshs has +" It is a bit late to tell people ""don't tell anyone"" when you post a message here! I had hoped (and I tried to avert at ANI) a formal interaction ban. On the other hand, Pseudofusulina is hitting problems left, right and centre despite their evident ability to progress matters with sourcing etc (always a good thing). Their claims of ""ownership"" where none exists may end up boomeranging. I did and still would encourage you to discuss, albeit that is now much more problematic because of the 1RR and the interaction ban. Pseudofusulina has the right idea, but it might help if they practiced it themselves instead of merely preaching. Backing off is A Good Thing but claiming that you are backing off because of ownership is not and I rather think that Pseudofusulina may soon find themselves in an awkward spot for making those claims. Let's put it this way: things have been said. rightly or wrongly. I wish you well: you have been around for a long time, have done a lot of good and then, suddenly, things have got heated. It will almost certainly happen to me in due course, and so I really do understand the conflict. - " +3/14/07 - Do not vandalize the talk pages and have removed others' comments from this talk page. Please append your own comments rather than deleting those with which you disagree. I have restored the missing text. +" ANOTHER! ""Maurice, You are not the only one who has had problems with Wikipedia taking sides in a dispute, and being blatantly unfair to the other side without even giving them a chance to defend themselves."" My my, isn't this revealing', when all these personal voices accusing me of awful things hoped that some of the mud might stick with the reading public! " +Ext Links The external links section is overflowing and getting to the stage where it is of no use to anybody. If there are no sensible objections, in a few days i might clean it up so that only links that give the reader more info about psychotherapy are there, not all the ones telling the reader where to find a psychotherapist. This isn't the yellow pages. +editing my talk page Listen!, GSK I am sick of finding you're frickin, lame advice on my talk page. KEEP YOUR NOSE IN YOUR OWN BUSINESS! From now no more speedy deletion, warnings, or blockage of editing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOW SHUT UP, YOU MORON!!! +Hello! Hey Sarah, It's been aaages. How have you been all this time? Probably happy seeing as the Hawks won the Grand Final. Anyway I hope to stay active this time. Over the time I've gone I've edited other wikis and really improved my wiki-ing skills. I've even became an administrator at some sites. Anyway one question. Is allowed on Wikipedia? It is a copyrighted image but a logo. If it is allowed, I might consider adding the logos to all city council articles. I'm already on to a project completing this list. Anyway, Cheers, PS, Happy New YEAR! +United Kingdom I think the United Kingdom itself maybe be emerging to be an early 21st century super power with the US as the world hyper power. Here's the reasons for me thinking this: Second to the US in world diplomacy Second highest defence budget Second largest navy in terms of tonnage Second most power projection capability Second largest aircraft carrier fleet with second largest aircraft carries being built after the Nimitz aircraft carriers UN Security Council seat and founding member Head of the Commonwealth of Nations (the largest organisation of states after the UN) The British monarch is also Head of State of 15 other countries such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand Major player in NATO and EU Large North Sea oil and gas production London being one of the greatest cities in the world City of London being the world's main financial centre in terms of number of amount of money that passes through it each year and largest gathering of financial groups. Pound Sterling one of the world's top currencies alongside US Dollar and Euro Second highest growth for major developed economies after US. Its own nuclear missiles on nuclear submarines which have joint longest range with US nuclear submarines Largest number of over seas territories Carried out major invasions of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Was only the nation to actually invade Afghanistan and Iraq alongside US forces (Other forces came after US & UK forces had secured the countries) Second largest force in Iraq and Afghanistan Leads the fight against Afghan rebels in Helmand province Controls southern Iraq and large areas of Afghanistan Leads NATO force in Kosovo The leading nation in tackling global warming A leading country in the Middle East road map to peace Most involved in Darfur issue Second most involved in Iran nuclear issue Single handedly resolved Sierra Leone issue I think since the end of the Cold War to present the United Kingdom has played the second largest role in the world after the United States, and after all the role a country plays in the world is what defines a super power. Also the United Kingdom demonstrated that it can single handedly and quickly defeat a regional power and quickly resolve a conflict when it won the Falklands War. This is more than what can be said for such countries as the United States or Former Soviet Union. After the Second World War and during the 1950s the United Kingdom was considered to be a super power because of the role it played in the world but the after effect of the Suez crisis made this disappear. The Falklands war and Thatcher-Reagen era displayed the UK was preparing to retrieve its status as being on the same level as the USA and USSR. Soon after this the Cold War ended and with no Soviet Union left to counter the United Kingdom in any way (like in the Suez crisis) the Thatcher-Reagen duo had worked and the United Kingdom set in motion activities to reclaim such a postion it had in the world that it had in the world before the Suez crisis in time for the beginning of the 21st century. The 1990s was a bit of a prelude to today and saw the United Kingdom slowly begin to prepare as being a power equal to the US and former USSR by being eager to greatly contribute to the Gulf War and and Yugoslav wars and grew more involed in Western Africa by sending troops there to resolve conflict in Sierra Leone and was testing its place as second most powerful in the world to the US and in being a semi super power again. Soon afterwards September 11th happened and the War on Terror that followed gave the United Kingdom just what it needed to reassert itself on the world stage and came just at the right time to have given the United Kingdom time to perpare and try out its future after the end of the Cold War and for the beginning of the 21st century. Today the United Kingdom is easily seen as being second most powerful on the world stage diplomatically and even militarily and could be called a semi super power. People have started to raise this issue called the British Moment in the 21st century. The United Kingdom also acts very much as a deciding force in NATO and the EU in which policy they take or their futures in whether it decides to side with the US or EU and can have an effect around the world. It also greatly influences the other 52 members of the Commonwealth of Nations which it heads by its monarch and is the largest body other than the UN. Not to mention its influence and veto power of being a permanent member of the UN Security Council. +" All that needs to be done is some DVD commentaries, a voice actors' comments available on the DVD, some staff comments, and maybe a few afterword,which I cannot access due to a language barrier. Also, some info on what happened during their separation in 1934 is needed. ) ~ ? C " +" Thanks, my dear friend, and likewise, so ""good day"" to you and to him, but, by the way, what's your first name? Extremely sexy " +"not-even-wrong speculations like string theory and loop-gravity with little testability. Shelly Glashow (Nobel Prize) has been quite vociferous about this. Of course that does not stop Brian Greene from making millions of dollars on purely speculative ideas - pretty though they are. BTW Brian, who I met at State of the World Forum in 2000 funded by Joe Firmage did borrow some ""cranky"" ""crackpot"" ""kooky"" ideas from me that he used in his NOVA PBS TV Show on ""The Elegant Universe"". For example Brian goes into a telephone booth to call ET! Compare to http://stardrive.org/cartoon/spectra.html Also I introduced Jacques Vallee to Francis Ford Coppola in 1976 when I brough Uri Geller to one of his parties. Everyone was there and that's how Jacques became technical director on ""Close Encounters of the Third Kind""" +he is really very hot and im really in luv with him and know one will know who i relly am!!!!!!!!!!:) +Since you're the one who is making a huge change to the article, and you have been reverted by several users now, maybe you're the one who should consider explaining your edits. (And the place to do it is on the article's talk page, not here.) I will say you are likely to keep getting reverted if you continue to replace information that has a good variety of reliable sources with information sourced to a wordpress blog. Self-published sources like blogs are not considered reliable. And even if you had provided a reliable source, you didn't explain why you deleted so much other sourced material. I suggest you open up a discussion on the article's talk page if you have suggestions for improving the article. Cheers, +Hi. There was a Korean remake of Ringu, and I believe that's why it carried the Korean cinema category that you removed. I reverted the change, just wanted to tell you that so that you can respond if you feel differently. Cheers. — 02:05, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering with us. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! +I was blocked because I subscribe to the porno movies that the mom of black kite stars in. +" Architecture The article Tudor style architecture is on Tudor architecture; this clearly isn't, and the standard term for modern (20th century and after) copies of Tudor is ""mock-Tudor"" (see Tudorbethan architecture). (Talk) " +Please see Wikipedia:UP, especially sections under Inappropriate content and Ownership and editing of pages in the user space. Your userpage is not private. +Please note, I cannot produce a reference for something that did not happen, see below. You are rewarding the editor who is making false claims against a living person and respected academic (not Meyer but Laughton). +"====Regarding edits made during August 9 2006 (UTC) to Oprah Winfrey==== Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. don't talk email me " +Gould was a massively overrated self-pusher81.178.153.156 +" DYK for Girangaon On April 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with from the article Girangaon, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. ☆S93 " +" ""The way wikipedia works is a little bit strange to me. I rather discuss any changes in an article before actually making them. In that way you have a little bit concencus on the changes. Now i see that everybody is changing and the next passing stranger is changing it back again. ?This doesn't seem to be really efficient Zervas was important for the cham issue. The Greek always told that they only expelled nazi cham to Albania. In fact Zervas was collaborating with the germans to expell all cham to albania.When you read the illiryan.org you at least get a small impression of what happend. After you accept that there is an other point of view it is wise to investigate where the truth lies. In this it is sad that a different opinion is directly deleted. I use the talk page on purpose because i think that the changes should be made after the discussion and not before. Greetings " +I suggest you give the same message to Rrius. Let me tell you that non-candidacy in the Labour leadership was very important. I have looked at the other references, such as 2005 Tory election and US Presidential elections and the precendence is the same. There is a very strong case for having images on the basis that non-candidates were extremely important to the contest. +Why does this magazine exist? They shouldn't be allowed to publish a magazine about something that is harmful to the brain and also illegal. I think society is catering to stoners a little too much. +" Alleged Cyaxares tomb Sources disagree with Kurdo-bigot claims: At the so-called “Median” stone tombs, which are now recognized as the burial places of late Achaemenid notables (Gall, 1966), there are scroll capitals somewhat resembling Ionic forms (e.g., those on the tomb of Qyzqapan; Gall, 1988, pp. 557ff.; see Figure 57h). At Cambridge history of Iran text also say that scholars incline to post-Achaemenid dating. Current version claims tomb is ""identified by Diakonoff"" while in Iranica article (published years after his earlier works) he doesn't even mention it. Obivously, theory about ""Cyaxares' tomb"" is abandoned. I see Wikipedia is becoming CHARLATANOPEDIA, because even admins stand after Kurdish ultra-nationalist and bigots. Shame. 109.165.198.30 " +If reliable sources describe the world inaccurately, then yes, so do we. Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. 148.177.1.210 +Your threat You have threatened to block me, but clearly this user's vanity page has been compromised by his own editing of it, no? Is Wikipedia the encyclopedia anyone can edit who agree with a certain cabal of administrators? +Nu Sigma Beta Article... ElJohnson15 please keep yourself and your fellow frat brothers from editing the Nu Sigma Beta Article... It is very disrespectful to add lies to an article in order to boost and promote your fraternity. Our founding members were in no way rejected from your frat, you dont have any historical basis for this except for the traditional story tellings between frats... now what should be in your article and isnt is that the Phi Sigmas where really founded in 1968... taking credit for old lost and dead fraternities as heritage is lame at most... 1928 my behind... but u dont see any of us attacking your fraternities article... but there are alot of angry nu sigmas out there and all with access to the internet...id really hate to see these articles vandalized back and forth for silly reasons... so u keep your hands of our article we will keep ours from yours... take care... in Fraternal Spirit... Javier +Virginia Politics My mistake! I did not mean to add in that portion. +May 2010 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Mmpublicity, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent or act on behalf of http://www.mmpublicity.com/. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Fæ +Yup, it's fine for now, thanks. (''talk) +hm It's your call buddy. I didn't use that account to touch any of the relevant areas of work (i.e. tables). Unless I get blocked again, it's likely I won't use it again. +It is, as you say, a miscommunication over timing. I'm sorry to have troubled you. +Communist Party of India (Marxist) page I also think that six images are so much for an article with such a length. However, this does not justify your vandalism. If you may decide which ones are pepresentative of CPI(M), for example a column in Kerala, one poster in Urdu, etc., go for it but if you cannot decide, don't ever touch it please. +wikipedia at university I realized you were using it too, and I thought I'd contact you after the semesteryou seemed busy and I'm trying to finish my dissertation... +, 6 September 2009 (UTC) And I didn't mean to say that you said the Romans named them; I was glad that you might correct a misconception represented online. But once I noticed the discussion (you'll have to forgive me for barging in; I'm frequently on Haploidavey's page), I did become intrigued by when the animals got the name, because it seems an imaginative and self-conscious piece of naming, and I'm interested in the ways scientists and naturalists used their classical educations in the 1500s–1900s. 05:41 +" I have no desire to belong to bin Laden's group, only to create factually correct articles. If we created an article incorporating the World Islamic Front (WIF) with the larger organization created by the WIF through their Jihad Against Zionists and Crusaders fatwa, it would incorrectly identify members of the larger organization as being strictly Islamic. Nowhere in the Jihad Against Zionists and Crusaders fatwa, does the WIF limit the membership of the organization to Muslim. In his video and audio addresses, bin Ladin often refers to the International Front for Jihad against the Zionists and Crusaders (IFJZC) as a multi-cultural organization or movement concerned primarily with doing what is right for all people by objecting to the special interests of Zionists and Crusaders. He regularly appeals to Americans to join the IFJZC to fight ""tyranny and suppression of freedom to [our] own country, ...the Patriot Act under the disguise of fighting terrorism."" " +You're trying to add material to an article that has been removed now by two other editors. As I know you're aware, from looking at your list of edits, the onus is on you as the editor adding material to justify why it needs to be added. I don't see that you have done so. +" The Bokenkotter book meets the highest standards of WP:reliable source examples It is not written as a textbook, it just so happens to have been used as one for three decades by multiple universities for the simple reason that it is considered the most scholarly and definitive work on the history of the Church. I have not seen Falconi's assessment in any other source. You say it is in Sanchez' book - can you provide an isbn, page number and quote? That would be helpful. Thanks. '''talk " +" Fair enough. The closing editor at the second AfD wrote ""...Any appeal should be made at WP:Deletion review..."" so the next step is Wikipedia:Deletion review if anyone wants to create it. I actually unprotected this and stubbed it for an editor today, but then quickly reverted myself. I just don't have much experience with band-related articles, so I'll stay out of this one. See also: User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Requesting page move from my sandbox to Harry Styles " +I am no pagan vandal! I WAS SERIOUS!!! Explain to me how it is newsworthy even in the slightest!!!! This site WAS NOT set up to cater to the needs of a few ausies and a few germans you know!!!211.28.41.32 +" If the album is to be defined as Neo-Soul then, what gives it that exclusivity if other artists such as Miguel, Alicia Keys, Erykah Badu, and others don't get when describing their albums, which have the same roots, the same influences, the same marketing, but yet critics aren't explicitly calling these albums strictly ""Neo Soul"" albums? Alicia Keys' last three albums do not have ""Neo-Soul"" affixed in their list of genres on their respective articles. In fact, in addition to soul, Pop and R&B; are both listed on the pages of those albums Girl on Fire (album), The Element of Freedom, As I Am. Take those labels off if her albums are just supposed to be ""Neo-Soul"" like the way it is on The 20/20 Experience. And perhaps if Byron Lee and the Dragonaires, whom are known to be Calypso/Soca band put an album out and a critic calls it Zouk or Zydeco, but yet the music is clearly the same as the music they've put out before, when is the line drawn before we decide that maybe the critics may have judged it hastily or perhaps they are misguided if the music obviously falls in the band's native style? Wikipedia has an article on the Punta Music, which is music of my culture the Garifuna people, but what stops a critic from saying it's pop, or neo-soul, then having Wikipedia and the people who read reviews accept it as such? Would that not be taking away the cultural context? Would that not be debasing the originality of the said style? Would that not give way to confusion to a person who knows nothing about the music? Where is the line drawn? I'm saying, where's the consistency? Why not describe the music in a holistic sense and not just based on what a couple people, no matter how credible, might assume it to be? The reviewer Steven Hyden (), described ""Mirrors"" as ""Zepplinesque"", does that make it a rock song, because he said so? In Pitchfork, the writer described ""Don't Hold the Wall"" as having ""Bhaṅgṛā rhythms"", does that put the song in that genre? I'm not following this logic. Speaking to the claim that Pop and R&B; describing the root of most popular music, The 20/20 Experience can be Neo-Soul to some people, but it can't be denied that it is also Pop, since it's on the pop charts, and the argument of whether it is pop or not is moot because of it's popularity and extent of exposure, and it is R&B;, because it's presence on the R&B; charts, which just as easily gives way to how the album is marketed also, the way the Neo-Soul style was when it first emerged. Yes, Pop, Rock and R&B; is the etymological root of most popular music, but that does not stop writers of album articles on Wikipedia from using them to describe the popular music they are describing. If that mattered, then those aforementioned genres should never be used to describe the music on an album released under the scope of popular music if the aim is to describe it so perfectly and narrow-mindedly." +"==In response to your feedback== If you click on the preview button you can see what you have got so far. If it is really bad you can forget about saving and start again. t looks as though you did not click the save button.  " +" PLEASE HELP I've seen that you've uploaded the BBUK current logo. I have been wrecking my brains out but can't seem to upload the Bigg Boss 7 logo under the same category in wikimedia commons. Please upload this file for me. My work always gets deleted because of incorrectly defined licensing. ( Here is the link to the new logo for Bigg Boss 7 > chat " +I agree. I'm removing it. It has no readily identifiable basis in fact, however its not very hard to estimate his motivations for claiming that. Removed. +Your Talk page Hi. Your user talk page is a place of others to communicate with you and for you to communicate with them. It isn't a great place to compose an article. I'd like to suggest that you create a user subpage like, for example, +If you look at the edit history for the Human Aftter All page, you'll notice that your additions to that article were removed by someone else. As for Daft Punk, that article is particularly prone to various genre additions. The point of the genre field should be to describe the artist's work in general, rather than listing every genre the artist has ever attempted. +" Leave my talk page alone Pretend your mother taught you some manners. Talk " +Hi , I'm back from my sister's wedding! I'll be happy to help you with all that, although I need to warn you that I have very limited access to library materials, and I've never scanned or OCR'd anything in my whole life. Where does one go to find a scanner? Maybe we should also take care of the concerns on the peer review as well? Forgive me, but I'll be on Wikipedia only spottily as I dive back into the real world; I was away for a long time! +Incidentally (don't take this the wrong way and ban me for 10 days again), are you high right now? +I can't because those sign-ins were banned by the Admin gods who own the world of Wikipedia and are never to be questioned.69.14.96.9 +JAN MOIR IS A VILE SLAG- SACK THE BITCH FROM THE DAILY MAIL +kig#REDIRECT Insert text#REDIRECT Insert text#REDIRECT Insert text#REDIRECT Insert text#REDIRECT Insert text gdsgegInsert non-formatted text hererMedia:Example.oggMedia:Example.ogg Headline text Link titleLink titleItalic text''''Italic text +" Hint (Sonic 2) ""Due to my recent hatred for vandalism, I am training to become a Wikipedia administrator. If you would like, kindly leave suggestions on how I can work my way to achieving this life goal."" Try to avoid edits like this because both the edit _and_ the summary let you look like a fool. " +" May 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sam Morgan, you will be blocked from editing. — (reply) — " +" I don't disagree with your point, except that I'm not exactly trying to appease here (I guess it sounded that way though) - I actually think both points of view have merit which is why I'd go with the Anglo-Australian type of construction (and maybe drop the Manx in the first sentence). As I said, if you had asked me before this discussion started where the Bee Gees were from, I would have said Australia, based on how I recall them being promoted in the 60s, and I also totally see the logic of considering them English so the dual wording does make sense to me. I've looked a bit and haven't come up with anything on the web to answer that question yet - maybe you'll have more luck. By the way, Olivia Newton-John may be relevant here: she is considered Australian as well, and her WIki article calls her ""English-born Australian"" or words to that effect. Her bio says she was born in England, moved to Australia at age 5 and moved back to England at 16 where she began recording - a pretty similar story to the BeeGees, and she's listed as Australian which might be how she self-identifies, I don't know. But on a quick read it appears she only lived there for about 10 years, like them. As for whether this editing is personal, I have no idea and don't want to get into it. I do know that I am trying to reach consensus among different points of view, on this exceedingly minor point - and as I have said, there was some fussing about it a couple of months ago and it settled down with the awkward wording, because it is accurate. So I hope we can drop this quickly and move on to something more substantive. " +"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Walkie-talkie " +YOU ARE FU-KING PROM-COUS BANNER!!!! I AM FU-KED YOUR DADDY, FU-KING WRE! NOW YOUR WILL NOT GO AWAY, FU-KING AS-LE! FU-KING COWARD! YOU ARE COWARD! FU-KING, COWARDLY, PROMI-US MOTHERFU-KER!!!!!! +Feel free to ban me another week for that one, you lazy superficial jurists.:-) +" i prefer to be called ""it"", you gender-specific sexist whore." +" File:Kongu Nadu.jpeg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kongu Nadu.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. hi! " +I am afraid i have to say he is the one editing my articles. If he does not stop neither will i. His english is so bad he should not be working on the english version of this. +I read this distinction to say a difference between collateral damage, and a policy of government to kill people. The example used of targeting munition factories stand in contrast to Dresden. The raid on Dresden targeted civilian population, it was not the result of collataral damage to German war industries. +and my friend uses a seperate account not owned/controlled by me +"==October 2007== Dear Leslie fyans, hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope to not seem unfriendly, but I'd like to bring to your attention the conflict of interest guideline which explains the potential incompatibility between the purpose of Wikipedia to produce a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia, and the purposes of an individual editor. Conflict of interest editing often involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote yourself, your friends or family, or the interests of other individuals, companies, or groups you are closely associated with. When an editor disregards the aims of Wikipedia to advance outside interests, they stand in a conflict. Please review this guideline, and you may wish to also review the notability guidelines as well. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia, and I hope you'll find many helpful areas! Sincerely, Ariel♥Gold Hi Leslie, I'm placing this here for your review, as your submission to articles for creation was specifically about yourself. Also please see Wikipedia:Autobiography, along the same lines. Normally if you are notable enough, reliable, third-party sources will exist, and an article will have been written. If you are notable (again refer to the notability requirements), but the article does not exist, you may request it, but either way, you should not edit an article about yourself, as explained above, as it would be quite difficult to remain neutral, which is one of the core policies of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thanks! Ariel♥Gold " +you are a hypocrite You constantly edit pages saying that wikipedia editors need to get a life, but you seem to spend your days and nights editing wikipedia yourself. It appears that you simply crave attention. Maybe you had a terrible childhood? Grow up. +If you want to stop being called a honcho, then stop acting like a honcho and start dealing with people like human beings. +" Calapone, don't get bullied by a psychopath. The YouTube clip is not ""yours"", it is Croatian Radiotelevision footage and as such can be considered a secondary source. DIREKTOR's rants are just a feeble attempt at disguising that all he has is his own opinion. There isn't a single source on this planet that can prove that the CoA in question was not used in official capacity. Cheers. (''talk) " +I think you should unblock me because I was only pointing out that the Pashtun people were a bunch of AIDZ infected niggers. Why do you have them as a featured article? Fucking monkeys... +I sent an email getting permission from the owner of the picture File:Energy Genesis Chamber.jpg to post it on Wikipedia. The picture was removed anyway. I sent email again to permissions@wikipedia. Can you check to make sure it was received so I can repost the picture? Thanks in advance B. +For the record, I agree with Tom here. There are plenty of Public Domain, BSD, and (L)GPL AES implementations out there. To add commercial implementations just makes this articles more useful for one personthe commerical implementor in question listed hereand less useful for everyone else who would otherwise download a free AES implementation. +In general, if there is a little humor as was clearly intended by whoever added those two comments, is that considered outright inappropriate? +"==Material deleted, incorrect material put in place by user Pgagnon999== A certain user has deleted correct information and posted politically biased information in this article. These are all in the first three paragraphs on the history of the town. Paragraph 1. The original town name of Middletown was spelled ""Mattabeseck"", this can be seen in the records of the general Assembly of Connecticut, which were QUOTED in this article until the ignorant and unscrupulous poster deleted the reference. This is significant in that southwestern Algonquin was spoken with a much harder inflection on the consonants, -and Mattabeseck is a southwestern Algonquin town. Paragraph 2. Quotations about Puritan life in general are irrelevant in this article. Paragraph 3. William Cronin is not a reliable source for local detail in Connecticut. Cronin's highly inflammatory accounts of the history of the settlement of America is very controversial, and has been shown to be very factually inaccurate and unreliable. It was very popular as a piece of political argument, and very poor historical scholarship. That this article MUST include this kind of erroneous detail is unfortunate. That the systems and procedures that define Wikipedia are not able to withstand this kind of assault from the politically-minded and ignorant marks the limitation of Wikipedia's usefulness. " +" Why is Elite not mentioned in the Space Trading and Combat section? It would seem to me to be the first game to have all those attributes, or at least the first breakthrough game with those attributes. 82.23.149.238 Should be fixed now.  Talk  " +What are you qualified in? I see you issuing threats to contributors of Wikipedia - it seems you are some sort of administrator - may I respectfully enquire what qualifies you to monitor contributions, and how did you get this job. You and others like you at Wikipedia remain anonymous, no one seems to know exactly what fields you people are qualified in, yet you reign supreme. This is why I use Wikipedia as a second line of information because there is absolutely no information on its contributors. Do you care to comment? +" No prob, — (Tαlκ) 04:40, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)" +Hello! During The Dangerous Tour in 1993 Michael Jackson had planned to visit Mexico. The initial dates for the concerts in Mexico City were planned to be as following: 29/10/1993, 31/10/1993, 2/11/1993, 4/11/1993 and 6/11/1993. The first 2 concerts were done as planned. Now, Jackson had problems with his health and the last 3 concerts were postponed. The dates for the last three concerts were then set as following: 7/11/1993, 9/11/1993 and 11/11/1993. There were also some minor plans to take Jackson also to Monterrey after Mexico City dates, but these plans were then cancelled, because Jackson cancelled the whole tour on November 12 because of ill health. Now, please do not any more change the fourth Mexico City concert date! It was planned to take place on November 4, not November 3!! Please also read Lisa D. Campbell book, which has been mentioned in the article. The full link is here: http://books.google.ee/books?id=n1S4bMjM8LoC&printsec;=frontcover&dq;=lisa+d+campbell&source;=bl&ots;=QubD3Tpe9J&sig;=iHrbYoYoK6Iwe0lieV4Docee0FE&hl;=en&sa;=X&ei;=bvVvUJ-7JrLO4QSg54HwBQ&redir;_esc=y#v=onepage&q;=november%204th&f;=false +RSPW As usual, he is wrong. +Let's get to fuckin big daddy == Man I love stickin shit in my asshole. Why don't you get on over here and show me some sugar ass fuck. Yeah baby. Smother it on me like hot sauce and then bang me baby bang me. == +AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIR +" Thank you kindly, . Whatever you did, the emoji dashboard is now working in Safari but with double load (3 emoji heads) the same as it's still doing in FF on this Mac. Not a big deal. I may have added the script where it shouldn't belong, like in common.js or a skin maybe, or it could be global that's causing it. Anyway, thank you again!! 📞📧 " +Suspected sockpuppetry by editor Hi King of Hearts, please would you investigate users hoary and yunshui whom I suspect to be the same person. Hoary has suggested the page Jude Calvert-Toulmin for deletion but his remarks are sneering, sarcastic and are obviously a personal attack which contravenes Wikipedia's guidelines for impartiality. He has been criticised extensively by other users: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hoary one of whom has remarked: the personification of everything that is wrong with wiki and the internet in general, one person who has a bee in his bonnet about something and won't listen to consenus and people with more experience and knowledge Hoary has a specialist interest in Japanese history. Another user, Yunshui, has just requested deletion. He also has a specialist interest in Japanese history. Sockpuppetry is illegal on Wikipedia and personal vendettas reflect very badly on the Wiki community. This editor obviously does have some kind of personal vendetta against the Jude Calvert-Toulmin page (or person) evidenced by the sneering sarcastic tone of his attacks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jude_Calvert-Toulmin#Jude_Calvert-Toulmin Thankyou. +, 24 April 2014 (UTC)|decline=I might have accepted this until you decided to claim someone else did it. See WP:BROTHER. :==( o ) 14:55 +Similar User Name It appears that you have inadvertently chosen a username that is similar to that of an active contributor - that prohibits this practice, please refrain from any more edits to these articles until you have chosen a new user name. You can request that your user name be changed to a new one (and thereby keep your edit history in tact) by lodging a request at WP:RENAME. +This is bull**** this is Y2K all over again!!!!!! this is all **** just to make little kids scared. If I ever meet the guy who brought this whole topic to the world I'll kick his teath in and shove his ****'n fact up his *** so he should shut the **** up and get his fact straight before scaring kids! **** OFF! and **** YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +" Removal of link from a personal page. You wrote: I went forward and removed the link. T C My reply: Sure you are most welcome to remove the http://ip address no problem, but why do you call that ""promotional"", with all the respect, it links to a page with much higher page rank... maybe it is WP-my personal page that is being promoted? " +Blaming infidelity for homosexuality She met Jack Dunphy, then a dancer with the Littlefield company, in 1937. They married in 1939 and separated after Dunphy's service during World War II, during which McCracken had an affair with French composer Rudi Revil. Dunphy was devastated by the infidelity and blamed it for his change in sexual orientation. He adopted a gay lifestyle, became romantically involved with Truman Capote, and he and McCracken were divorced in 1951. Dunphy remained Capote's partner until his death in 1984. I'm skeptical of the statement that Dunphy simply chose to be gay after the affair. This sounds like sneaky POV pushing. For the most part, the consensus is that people are born gay, they don't choose it. I think the sources need to be looked at a bit closer here or at the very least, properly attributed to the authors. +I have tried to carefully word things so as to NOT make Smith look bad. But I don't think that means excluding interesting and necessary history about this film. +You know what suck my mother fuckin' balls bitch, i don't giva shit. This fuckin' fake as pussy encyclopedia. This damn site can't even be used as a reliable source bitch. So fuck all ya'll motha fuckin' think you know it all bitch asses. FUCK YOU +Fnarf, like anyone takes notice of what you think. oh how rude of me, i forgot to say hello. +Ok look this guy Sesshomaru was vandalizing my stuff. That's how I see it. He changed my talk page twice and then marked an article I had just made for deletion. Then he has the audacity to go to my talk page and warn me for removing the speedy deletion mark and reverting his edits. I mean come onnnn. How am I supposed to assume he had good intentions when it's obvious he was just messing with my stuff?? But you see, nothing happens to him because what he did technically isn't against wikipedia policy. What he did was worse, but because his actions were undefined in the wikipedia policy, nothing happens. And then I get in screwed for calling it how I see it. It makes no sense. It's like he gets away with robbery and I get put in jail for stealing gum. ghetto +" Yep. You are right, I hadn’t thought it through. Any methodology must be proscriptive. I take back the comment about distinguishing ""ought"". 20:42, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC) " +" Test Candid Camera: Australian Photography 1950s–1970s was a group retrospective exhibition of social documentary photography held at the Art Gallery of South Australia from 28 May to 1 August 2010.Art Gallery of South Australia Exhibitions Candid Camera website Candid Camera had its roots in Six Photographers, a groundbreaking exhibition held in Sydney in May 1955, which concentrated on what was still a relatively new development in Australian photography and featured the work of Max Dupain, David Potts, Axel Poignant, Gordon Andrews, Kerry Dundas and Hal Missingham.Robinson, Julie ""Candid Camera: Australian Photography 1950s–1970s"" Art Gallery of South Australia exhibition catalogMcDonald, Patrick ""The Way We Were"" The Advertiser, 20 May 2010 AdelaideNow websiteNewton, Gael ""Shades Of Light: Photography And Australia 1839-1988"" Collins Australia, 1988 (ISBN 0732224055) The work of the first three of these artists is also represented in Candid Camera. Six Photographers, an artist-initiated show that featured 200 images at a time when exhibitions of personal photographic work were rare, was regarded as sufficiently influential for the Art Gallery of New South Wales to commemorate it with a show of the same name featuring the same six photographers, more than 50 years after it had first been presented.Newton, Gael ""Shades Of Light: Photography And Australia 1839-1988"" Collins Australia, 1988 (ISBN 0732224055)Newton, Gael ""Silver And Grey: Fifty Years Of Australian Photography 1900-1950"" Angus & Robertson, 1980 (ISBN 0207141096)Art Gallery of New South Wales Exhibitions Archive AGNSW websiteAllen, Christopher ""Decisive Moments"", The Australian, 27 February 2010 The Australian website This second version of Six Photographers featured 29 images, many of them shown in 1955, and concentrated on works from the same period (the late forties through to the mid-fifties). Candid Camera, while about half the size of the 1955 Sydney exhibition, covered a significantly wider range of artists and looks not just at the foundations of Australian social documentary photography but at the era that curator Julie Robinson clearly regards as its golden age – the fifties, sixties and seventies. In line with the statements issued by the six photographers group, Candid Camera featured “images which appear unposed, spontaneous, or with their subjects captured unaware”. Though the majority of the photos in the exhibition (more than 80 in total) were taken in Australia, images by Australian photographers working overseas were also included.Allen, Christopher ""Unguarded Moments"", The Australian, 17 July 2010 The Australian websiteEmmett, Patrick ""Candid Camera"" ABC Television interview, originally broadcast on Stateline, 28 May 2010 ABC website Subjects included youth subcultures, newly arrived migrants, nuns, a number of prime ministers (though not all were in office at the time of the photo), musicians such as Bon Scott of AC/DC, and ordinary people in everyday settings: at work, at the beach and at bus stops. Photographers represented in Candid Camera included Max Dupain, David Moore, Jeff Carter, Max Pam, Robert McFarlane, Mervyn Bishop, Rennie Ellis, Carol Jerrems and Roger Scott and a number of others. Of those named, all have work held in the permanent collection of National Gallery Of Australia. Mervyn Bishop is the only Aboriginal Australian to have been included, and though his work has primarily been in New South Wales, Robert McFarlane was the only photographer to be born in South Australia. In this last regard, Candid Camera was very different to Century In Focus, an earlier large-scale photographic survey curated by Robinson, which dealt only with images taken in South Australia.Robinson, +" Falcon and Magluta i wrote an article called, 'falcon and magluta', which you ""edited"" or worse (i cant say vandalized because its against diki rules, even though i and others think otherwise). anyway, i need your answer to a question. on that article, one of the headings was, 'Rise to Power'. you changed it to 'Rise'. why did you do this considering that falcon and magluta rose to power since everyone knows that billionaire drug lords are powerful. you dont become a billionaire without becoming powerful. why does the heading, 'Rise to Power,' worry you so much that you had to change it? i'm of italian descent. i noticed that many editors and admins have some ethno-centric/racist views. i would like to know if you carry such views considering how you ""edited"" my article. " +" Are you some sort of idiot?? ""If you don't want the warning messages, then stop adding unsourced information."" I just told you i didnt! Now remove that rubbish attached to my ip because the orange box wont go away, like you 83.71.70.5 " +Mmmm that would be my error. I am sorry, I saw a bunch of links being added, and that threw a red flag in my mind. I will revert myself. I am sorry. —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) +Hey no problem. ) Yeah once you get the hang of it, its a really nifty tool. And I know what you mean. If its a complex type of page, it can be a mess. But WikiCleaner is great for nationalities like American and British, which are linked to by 10+ articles every day but generally only have one target (United States and United Kingdom, respectively). If you need any assistance with it, let me know. +Clark County Forest I thought of something. There was some sort of a gruesome murder of a kid about 15 on the firetower in the Clark State Forest back about 1973. It was a real big sensation at the time because it was so horendous how the kid was killed. I am trying to google some stuff on it, but that might make a useful addition to the article. (Talk) +User Eleland a nasty piece of work needs to be brought down by a concerted effort of all those his supercilious edits have harrmed124.191.88.235 +" I will say here that I agree with most of the terms especially the requirement for a source. I will agree with all as I do not think saying ""especially Christianity"" was absurd. So The Hybrid, could you define the word ""absurd"" more rigourously. I am satisified that most of my edits in ""Criticism of Pokemon"" was not deleted though, although I still felt the need to emphasize the part about Christianity as that section is about Christian's opinions of the Pokémon series. I had a conflict with Brandon about not sourcing that part where I didn't say source my statement about religion not being mentioned in the cartoon, but I do not think that has to be sourced as most of the members of PCP actually agrees that religion was never metioned. I do feel, however, that is the only article one can talk about religion in an article about Pokémon. With the exception of the word ""absurd"" I agree with the terms. Regarding the issue of ignoring me, I will disagree with this. I do feel that you should ignore me when I discuss religion in most Pokémon articles, but if I am not doing that, it could have detrimental consequences. I agree with The_Hybrid that the religion things has gone on long enough, ok. Do we all have an agreement? Let's not engage in anymore vitriolic conduct, ok. " +I'm sorry I can see now that nothing I say will be read as sincere. I'm sorry that this is the case. I really was trying to help things. I felt that if I told you my side of things you might understand me better. I wasn't trying to lecture you. I really feel like I have been attacked from the beginning. Whether or not you think it is correct isn't really the issue. It is the way I feel. If you think through how things have happened you will see that it is a pretty legitimate feeling. We both reverted three times (I counted). If you want to call me the bad guy for reverting, then call him the bad guy too. If you want to accuse me of being disrespectful, show me where. I wasn't disrespectful until the point at which you reverted my suggestion, yet you accuse me of being disrespectful before that point. Basically, if you're going to start off accusing me and not caring about my view of the situation, then what hope do I have of having my POV appreciated in the consensus? None! The mediator of the discussion is already convinced I'm in the wrong. You can delete this if you want, but I hope you read it first. I'm not trying to point fingers!! I'm just trying to help you understand... From my view, you felt like you needed to step in and help with an edit war. You set some ground rules and are trying to establish a consensus. You saw me and thought I was adding something questionable to the article. You reverted it, thinking the article would then be in its original state. (This wasn't the case. My edit was the original.) You somehow saw my edits as disrespectful. You saw my change as a deliberate attempt to violate consensus when I thought it was a step in the right direction. I saw someone chide me in all caps and reacted defensively, pretty natural reaction, right? Neither of us are in the wrong here, or both of us are. Wrad, I think the problem is that you mean one thing but say another. For example, you call this an apology...give me a break...you're just justifying your actions and insulting me in the process. Please stop talking to me personally, and let's just communicate professionally and respectfully on articles and their talk pages. +As for the Young one, I'll admit that I hastily blocked that one, but I feel that that one along with mostly all of the others would not become a problem in the forseeable future... +ps: And World of Warcraft and City of Heroes/City of Villains both use it. I'm not sure if COH actually keeps track of healing. I think only radius-heals, if that. Meaning that if WOW does do all heals, describing it in those solid terms will make the article less correct in reference to COH's Aggro. I also believe that COH also ramps up the hate if a particular creature is weak against a particular attack type. - +" That was an appeal for arbitration. Your response was to block me and call me ""fringe"". Despite what you think in your pea bvrain, believers in religion are NOT a ""fringe"". That is only your bigoted, nazi-like attitude against religions you don't like, which you sir have now exposed for the entire world to see. /talk/ " +Well, I found many blogs and indymedia posts, plus this Seattle PI editorial. Some make reference to an article by Robert Fisk for the Independent, but a paid subscription is required to read it. +Bullying Isn't it amazing how you don't change the other edits done to the page regardless of content and only change mine? If this isn't targeted bullying than I don't know what is. 12:34, 15 August 2012 (EST) +Again , Editor AcorruptionfreeIndia is confusing other editor by his specious arguments .First of all, Election commission only display National or State (defined) parties constitution in their Website ,thats why thy don't have APP or Loksatta or any other New/starting political party constitution and for AAP constituion, google it ,thy must have an constitution to register their party to election commission(unlesss Editor Acorruptionfreeindia suggesting Election commission didn't register/reconfigured AAP as political party). TY of Walk +Oh so andy can have a history of this crap, yet I retaliate and I get a warning for an indef? I really love the fair, equal and level headed fashion in which you administrate this website. +" Okedokie. I moved it to the bottom because the ""popularity"" section is pretty much the same information and putting the sales figures next to that complimented it nicely. What do you think? Thanks 20 " +" Thanks that means that Battle of France and Norwegian Campaign are first. Oh and I think D212012F just commented on his page ) Expert " +" I protest not for the sake of arguing but for the sake of independence, for the sake of speech freedom, for the sake of liberty. I returned to Wikipedia with this account as I said in my first contribution that ""[t]he first course of action I must take is pursue defense of my actions on my previous account"". I was blocked before I had settled that matter. I had not had the chance to become a constructive editor because I was not finished with my pursuit of justice. However, cum laude I left my streak on Bode Miller to the first sentence with my only mainspace edit. My contribution to that renowned, reformed skier will prevail for many years to come. My first argument against my block is that Jpgordon, an involved administrator, blocked me. This is an utter no-no on Wikipedia — an involved administrator, who himself is the epitome of most administrators (abusive, unkind, and unjust [not a personal attack]), blocking someone he dislikes. Through my praxeological observations, I have realized that Josh clearly demonstrates cui bono. By this unjust block, Wikipedia is regressing, I daresay, regressing into the reign of terror. I propose that this block be dealt with in one of two of the following ways: My block be reduced to one month, several months, or even a year. If I really am not a constructive editor, I wouldn't return. As devoted as I am, I will always strive to become useful here. My block be lifted. I will strive to make constructive additions to Bode Miller and other great Olympians. I will refrain from editing any talk pages so that I will not have any chance to ""troll"" or ""harass"". If I ever start trolling again, block me forthwith. After a couple months, allow me to edit talk pages again so I can work to develop mutual understanding with my fellow Wikipedians. Once I do anything you do not like, block me. How much vandalism can I inflict when at least six administrators are watching me? My last request is that an uninvolved administrator adjudicate between Jpgordon and me. , , , (for their posts on my talk page) and and (for their posts at the Administrators' noticeboard) are now involved, so please find an uninvolved administrator to review this. If you worry about my not being constructive if I am unblocked, I ask that whoever is handling this request exsert those worries. After having been blocked for ""[d]isruptive editing"" on my previous account, I returned with this one. I returned to make amends. I returned to set right everything I disordered. I returned to assert my concerns. I returned with the hope of maintaining this stately encyclopedia, and I partially fulfilled this here. I would like to continue perfecting this great community. My last hope when I returned was to get blocked again, this time indefinitely, but instead to participate in the creation of an online encyclopedia destined to become the essence of Internet, the essence of knowledge, and the essence of perfection. As Carl Rogers once said, ""If we value independence, if we are disturbed by the growing conformity of knowledge, of values, of attitudes, which our present system induces, then we may wish to set up conditions of learning which make for uniqueness, for self-direction, and for self-initiated learning"". I believe just that and hope to introduce it to the Wikipedia community. I sincerely apologize for my attacks (as you put them) at administrators. To , if you find problem with my username, if I get unblocked, I will be open to changing my username. I am a man true to my word, so don't hesitate to unblock me. Thanks, " +I was introduced to Roddy when he worked the late night shift at WKBW in Buffalo NY sometime around 1966/7. A friend took me to the radio studio where we went to see him DJ. It is certain at that time at least he was gay, he had a small apartment above the Tudor Lounge on Franklin Street which I visited. There is nothing shameful about him being gay. +Dahn:Wait a little Dahn, of what you explained, that you were obligated by law in the 2002 census to say if oyu have relatives abroad, that means there about 19.4 millions Romanians in the whole world??? No offence, but this is absolutely out of discussion. When I had the 2002 census, there was no place in the questionary for that. Banatean: although your explication makes no sense, let's see. You say that we should include only primary source information that means censuses. Come on, take a look at Poles, Italians or other large diasporas. At Poles by exemple, only USA, Canada and Poland are using census official infos. All others are unofficial sources, but they're however put there. Even for USA, when at the 2000 USA census, they were 8 997 000 Poles declared, they decided to add the unofficial larger figure of 9 300 000. Why this doesn't apply here??????? If you all sustain this stupid explanations, then answer my question: WHY AT ROMANIANS ARTICLE WE DON'T LIKE OTHERS, ICLUDE ALL KIND OF DATA?????????????? Come on guys, what is your proof for sustaining that? Arthur 28 October 2006 +" grammar please add the word 'to' before the word 'become' to: ""It's also advisable become oriented with the driving rules and regulations of destination countries."" (btw, this advice also applies to 'origination' countries!)" +I was just wondering what the incentive is for contestants to come on this show? Is there some sort of monetary prize? +Is there any particular reason for you to remove these discussions? Do you feel something's amiss? Maybe there's been some miscommunication. I just think it would be unfortunate if you got blocked for keeping up the deletions. Isotalo +" I will be delighted to see you blocked. Good day. – (talk) " +You should note the reasons I removed what I removed. Allegations of ties (involvement even?) to terrorism is a pretty serious matter. I deleted allegations that were either 1) refuted by more reliable and current sources (I assumed documents published with the support of Congress in Feb 2006 were more reliable than a magazine website that published articles on the same matter in 2001), 2) inconsistent with the sources actually cited (most of the indictments listed did not involve CAIR, and several allegations of indictment weren't sourced at all), and 3) editorial content that seemed to be founded in the writer's own opinion rather than sourced data. You suggested the information I deleted were 'important'. The information were pungent statements indicative of highly criminal acts on the part of CAIR, info which would have been noteworthy had they been properly documented and cited. Much of that information is refutable with more reliable sources, such as publications produced by the US government. Please discuss before further reverts. +Italic textBold text'''link title +" DYK Did you know? was updated. On 3 April, 2007, a fact from the article Indrajit Gupta, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page. (Talk) " +The reason I started this sub-thread was that I was mentioned in some bad journalism, while I had indeed tried to prevent with good methods what was a deplorable state of the Prem Rawat article. I still do the same, but I think is good for Jimbo to see where the resistance is coming from, directly, not filtered through complotist journalism. +References to use Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article. Woody's father +Maranao & Ifugao Prehispanic Architecture needed The Maranao and Ifugao people are examples of Prehispanic architecture and that they deserve to be featured in this article +Fuck You You can block me all you went im leaving this site anyways. Plus you have no life, Bitch sitting on the computer at 2:25 AM watching what people do. Your lame. +I assume that you have never met foreigners. What are you doing here? Your contributions are of no importance. Mine are. Shout your mouth 4ever. Don't forget that the English that is spoken in your place, is not all the English. Don't pretend that you do not understand me. I edited an article that I didn't create, it was obvious that I was ready to change my mind and discuss all the matter in the talk page, as I did before meeting you, butyou came here and revert a whole article without any discussion. You insulted me so many times, that anyone else would have been benned since a long time, but you haven't been banned yet, and some WPs are wondering why. If you are trying to make me say some swearing words, please forget it. I'll never insult you personally as you did. You must be banned not me. We are here to discuss and learn. +"Pasting deleted text here: The authors of the study acknowledged that the evaluation scale that they used may not have been appropriate for studies on meditation, which would have affected the rating of quality: ""The scale, however, may be criticized as being unsuited for the evaluation of nonpharmacological interventions such as meditation, where blinding of the subjects to the identity of the treatment they are receiving is likely to interfere with treatment effectiveness. Likewise, the Jadad scale does not evaluate the effectiveness of treatment implementation."" , Maria Ospina, et al, ""Clinical Trials of Meditation Practices in Health Care: Characteristics and Quality,"" THE JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Volume 14, Number 10, 2008, pp. 1210 " +Good to know any input is welcome. The only thing worse than a child molester is someone FALSELY accusing an innocent man of being one. The video shows a grandfatherly gesture of love. It is only inappropriate in the minds of twisted people. Probably those with a political agenda. Just throwing this out there, too! +" I think Ronnotel is using the blocking to ""punish"" my recent behave. That's not what the blocking policy is for: Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users. I certainly haven't made any disruptions to any articles on Wikipedia. The edit warring block was lifted. I think that an indef block for personal attacks it's not properly done. Maybe one week. I don't have a harassment history here. It's a zero! " +Firestar, who is this Rick Ross you mentioned? Does he teach at some respectable university? I sincerely doubt it. You know, I may say whatever I want about the nature of the Thirty Years War, but it doesn't mean anything to someone investigating it. You need to have sources who actually have some relevance. Is Ross a cult expert? Would he invariably call my religion, the Christian faith, a cult as well? I know the CCP would. I don't think these are viable sources. Introduce some methodology for Pete's sake! I think Mccon is totally right! Mibhorovovsky, I know you are just itching to block me. But now, all eyes are on you. Go ahead. I dare you. As a neutral third party to this discussion, I have to encourage some of you to make better arguments. In fact the very way that some things on this site have been said have inevitably led to my having a HUGE chip on my shoulder directed towards some of you. You should know that, though Mibhorovosky reverted what I said and blocked me, leading to censorship. +Actually, I didn't. I removed your incorrect tag placement and provided sources, before you threatened to spank me and you called me a racist. +April 2012 (UTC) We are commenting on the content. The content discussion is regarding bias and the WHO as a reliable source. All of this discussion goes to those two points. 02:58, 17 +Block Hullo. I am looking to overturn this last go round on AN and am trying some WP:DR to that end. I think you were premature to block my Alfadog account. The account was/is legit under WP:SOCK and I cannot see anything that you were aware of at the time that would support a block. I did use it improperly three weeks ago to make some minor WP:RCP edits but I do not think you were blocking me indef for that. I would like you to please unblock the account. I know there is a degree of mootness as Ryulong's proposal would reblock but I would like you to please undo your bit and then I will talk to Ryulong. Thanks. +The whole thing has been invented to avoid saying that Spanish is widely spoken in the United States. It's done for exactly the reason you suggest. +None of the actors looked like athletes let alone world-class olympians and none of them looked as if they'd been trained in athletics for the film. I mean a a dyed blond-haired young Nigel Havers, wimpy body and everything, an athlete? +I'll talk with User:Michael Hardy, but he just made a comment about the left-hand-side of the equation with which I don't have any problem (x/y are just indices). I guess he withdrew his comment when he saw that the point was the right-hand-side. Thanks! +I didn't make the edit.. P 128.230.169.203 +" Been a while. Happy belated: birthday, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and Groundhog Day. Take a break from all the WP nannying. Hope you're doing great @ MIT. Take another look at December 2008’s and last month’s archived portal pages and see if they work correctly on your end. Shades of Extreme Home Makeover - etc. This may be the closest I get to re-mastering old films, like they now have to do for Blu-Ray. Feels like it, fun but tedious. Some of these archived portal pages I've trundled through going back to Jan of '08 (so far) succumb to table-formatting bugs (on my platform [Tiger/Safari (+FF3)]). So I kludged the position of the calendars. But these two months work fine. No clue as to why they break. Is there a documented bug? This seems to be some kind of CSS error. The Portal:Current events/How to archive the portal page must not be visited very often of late, so I'm attempting to make its link more prominent by adding a comment above the ""fold"". Don't have a clue how many editors might contribute to the upkeep of this, though. Here are handy linx for you to peruse these pages, only the last 2 have reconstructed sidebars As Of This Writing (hereinafter ""AOTW""): January 2008 (works okay on my plat) February 2008 (broken, so it's kludged) March 2008 (okay) April 2008 (okay) May 2008 (works okay, International hols are an embarrassment [why just May?]) June 2008 (works OK) July 2008 (breaks with prescribed table formatting, so it's kludged) August 2008 (OK) September 2008 (OK) October 2008 (OK) November 2008 (also breaks so it's kludged. Don't know what'll happen if we attempt to reconstruct & restore a local [temporally speaking ;)] sidebar) December 2008 (Okay and complete, with the important comment that it's an archived section) January 2009 (Also OK, as above) So pass the word along that some spadework has been done, and it's as self-explanatory as I can manage to make it. Thanx again for all the great work on this design, unjustly neglected. Now to wake up our 2.5-year-old. Yes, it's been a while. " +Concerning Karen's death... Am I the only one who has registered that this section contains no dates? 109.152.252.33 +" Merge. No reason for this to be a stand-alone article. Lara " +Why has everybody on Wikipedia got so scared of a simple question. You no longer even giving reasons, as you know that I have outsmarted you. I'm sorry for the arrogance, but I have. If Jimbo Wales, unlike you lot, has an intelligent response to my original question, then I invite him to reply, but it seems to anybody who just stumbled across the talk page, he's too afraid. One of the Top Hundred People of the Year? Don't make me laugh. ( ) +No, he should be channeled away from areas where he's consistently proven incapable of editing without violating BLP to prevent the continuation of present, disruptive behavior. And others should stop making excuses for his unacceptable actions. t/c +" contents...."" Future instances of same reference: " +Ok, nevermind. I guess I understand what the problem actually is. +question Hi ... I only checked back a few weeks, but every single entry of 69.116.81.11 was vandalism, including those just now. Can't we block it? +and Minaj is a hypocrite... ...if she indeed performs for Angola's dictator, José Eduardo dos Santos, this Saturday, December 19th, collecting $2 million for her trouble. Black lives matter? Not so much to Nicki Minaj, apparently, which is what people will be saying for years if she follows through on this awful gig. Hey Nicki, what's good? Not your managers, if they didn't warn you of this bad PR tsunami now cresting over the horizon... What's NOT good? Human rights in Angola. Read it. Just a head's up to let you know that the Internet has a long, long memory for these things. It will forever be part of your biography, and how your character is judged. (Just ask Kanye how that Kazakh wedding gig helped his career.) +BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Going to John for protection, when you called him out about his name months ago. Too damn funny. Go back on Marc's basement site, and play with yourself, would ya? CHRIS A NUT. lmao. 173.104.94.253 +I agree with Lockeownzj00 doesn't seem to be relevant, nor in keeping with the tone of an encyclopedia article. +Opinion request Would you please weigh in at the Examples discussion at Talk:Fringe theory? Thank you. +" You've made three mistakes: Is the version I'd reverted to - unstable? On the contrary: the version that you were attempting to revert to - is unstable, because the chapter you'd removed, was added three years ago (on 5 May 2008), and lasted until 14 March 2011, i.e. until the day before yestreday, whereas the version you were attempting to revert to - lasted for less than 40 hours only - that were uncontinuous and broken, so which version is more stable? Returning the chapter you'd removed - is not against the consensus at all. The chapter is supported by User:(MOB)DeadMeat, and is also supported by User:Chrishatch1973, and is also supported by User:Eliko; whereas the removal of the chapter is supported by User:Basket of Puppies only. Really, it was also supported (in the past) by User:DragonflySixtyseven, however their reason for the removal - was refuted on their talk page (and on the article talk page as well), and they didn't respond to the refutation. According to the law: Silence gives consent, the very fact that User:DragonflySixtyseven didn't respond to the refutation - shows that User:DragonflySixtyseven does not reject the explanation given on their talk page (and on the article talk page as well) for returning the chapter. To sum up, three editors (User:(MOB)DeadMeat, User:Chrishatch1973 and User:Eliko) support the chapter, and one single user (User:Basket of Puppies) rejects it, so which option is more consensual? Returning the chapter, or removing it? The chapter you removed is relevant, as I'd explained on the article talk page - before you removed the chapter. If you think the chapter is irrelevant - despite my explanation (on the article talk page) why it's relevant, then please discuss that on the article talk page. Note that when you responded to me on my talk page - each one of us had made one revert only - during 2011, so: considering that the single revert I've made during 2011 - was sufficient for you to warn me of your reporting me for WP:3RR and edit-warring - if I ""continue to revert"", also your single revert you've made during 2011 - should be sufficient for me to warn you of my reporting you for WP:3RR and edit-warring - if you ""continue to revert"". If you continue to both - remove a consensual chapter - and replace it by an unstable version which is against the consensus, then I will report you for violating Wikipedia policy, that requires - to discuss everything on the article talk page - before removing a consensual chapter and before replacing it by an unstable version which is against the consensus. Anyways: due to your claim about irrelevance, I will add to the (stable consensual) chapter - some clarifications, to make sure that every reader (including User:Basket of Puppies) understands its relevance. " +" proposal you're just jealous. i'm young, unmarried, and you can say fit. i don't have a job but i'm of good facuties. i ask your daughter's hand in marriage, i'll keep her happy...aah...whatever...i'll try... what do you say, old man...give it a thought..i might just conquer the world one day.. Don't say ""get out of here""...i've heard that like a million times... say something different...surprise me...:)))" +}} {{featured article candidates|Charles Boycott/archive1 +" DYK nomination of Mark Williams-Thomas Hello! Your submission of Mark Williams-Thomas at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! '''''' talk " +Try debating on the talk page, first. +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism Policies on banned or discouraged content If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Policy on neutral point of view Guideline on external links Guideline on conflict of interest I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Category:WelcomeBotResearch" +Further note to potential reviewing admin If we have interacted in the past, thank you for your interest, but allow an uninvolved admin to review this. I will of course accept any further review. - (resonate) +Shoulda (Drew Seeley song) On the article Shoulda (Drew Seeley song), you banned for edit warring. is now making the same editsI think they're the same person, as they've done these same edits before and, at that point, the IP was blocked for 12 hours too. +Sargis Bkheera I'm of the opinion that this article should mention his Assyrian monk teacher, and it would be great if any of you Islam experts could help out improving that article. Thanks. |Talk 22:19, 13 Jun, 2007 (UTC) +Thanks, let me know if you need any help on anything in the future. +" Unclean animals I believe that there is a problem with the information regarding exclusions. The way it reads would imply that the ""pig"" is an exclusion to the rules set fourth by Jewish law. Absolutly not true! You might even say this is in some way a direct contradiction. Perhaps the original writer used the word (exclusion) erroneously. If you are unsure of what a word means, you obviously should not use it; especially in an encyclopedia." +And won't be back like that gay fucking bastard cunt ''' +" No, but he is able to undelete if he sees fit to do so. talk " +Heretofore be informed that there is a reason to write(or type) 12:00Am. This is that 12Am means the whole hour, while 12:0Am means ten minutes and 12:00Am means one minute. +Ok, here's a question. Why do I get banned for adding the truth to a user page? Timothy Buckley hides behind the username Thrindel and acts as a Wikipedia pest, making biased edits not just to his own creation, Ctrl Alt Del, but also vandalises pages of other webcomics. Thrindel IS Timothy Buckley, and I fail to see why Wikipedia would want to deny the truth to any of it's viewers. +That sounds like a good idea, just added it. +"::::*I've not used admin functions in a year and a half (except the issue at the top) and still make occasional edits (to the encyclopaedia!). I don't see any reason why this means I should somehow engage a process to drop my admin status. After all, I'm still in ""good standing"" - yeah? All this is yet another instance of focusing on the bureaucracy. / " +Your edits to November 5 Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! ► ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ +" OK, I'll list here what you flagged. Some are not mine. I'll comment later and see if others have individual opinion first. Since then similar efforts have been organized for other 2008 presidential candidates.[citation needed] Sample comment: This seems to be a fine summary statement, reliably sourced in the article such as by UPI. We can just copy the footnote refs to it. The popular usage of ""moneybomb"" to describe a coordinated mass donation drive for a political candidate can be traced to a weekly donation drive, the Ron Paul Money Bomb, which aimed to raise $1 million each week for Ron Paul's presidential campaign.[2][citation needed] (Daily Paul) Jesse Elder, a New York City jazz pianist,[3][4] registered the new identity ""RonPaulMoneyBomb"" at YouTube;[5][citation needed] (New York Times, All About Jazz, YouTube) Eric Nordstrom then registered the identical .com domain.[6][citation needed] (Network Solutions) Supporters of Mike Huckabee organized a moneybomb on November 20 to commemorate International Children's Day, which raised nearly $225,000, well over the pledged amount, bringing Huckabee's monthly total to $1 million as of November 20th.[11][citation needed] (Nov20ForTheChildren) Supporters of Dennis Kucinich's presidential campaign are also using the term ""moneybomb"" to describe their own major fundraising drive aimed for December 15, 2007, the anniversary of the Bill of Rights coming into effect.[12][citation needed] (News and Policy) Proposed on November 6 on Daily Kos, the drive has an ultimate goal for 100,000 pledges of $100.[13][citation needed] (December152007) Kucinich supporters are using viral advertising techniques to promote the drive by putting up YouTube videos and circulating them throughout the web.[citation needed] Along with generating a significant amount of donations for a political candidate, a moneybomb can also generate significant media interest in a largely unknown candidate.[citation needed] In addition to the media coverage, the November 5 drive was able to get 21,000 new donors to the campaign, over half of the donors on that day.[18][citation needed] (AP) While there is no definitive link, after November 5, Ron Paul saw a measurable rise in the polls, showing the potential ability for a moneybomb to improve a candidate's place in a political campaign.[20][21][citation needed] (TransWorldNews, NBC4)" +Well, cool! (Talk) +You advise is needed Hello Roger, This is not about arbitration because to be honest with you, I have passed that point. I will be closing my account in Wiki and stop contributing because of certain actions by certain people. What I want to know is what would happen to an administrator who make it their mission to target a particular group of people and advocate the deletion of any articles related to that particular group regardless of the number of verifiable sources produced etc? Can such administrator continue with such behaviour with no recourse or would there be an investigation and possible revokation of their title as administrator? Also, how do I permanently close my account with Wiki? Thank you +- (talk|contributions) +Let's quote what User:Ew actually said in the 2007 move debate: Architecture in Italy, 1400-1500 by Ludwig H. Heydenreich, Yale University Press; Second Revised edition, 1996, ISBN 0-300-06467-5, p.74, 80, 101, 183 (index) & 184 (index): ...by Giorgio da Sebenico, whose hand... ...with Giorgio da Sebenico... ...as important as Giorgio Orsini da Sebenico and... Giorgio da Sebenico... Orsini, Giorgio, see Giorgio da Sebenico. - Now go and read WP:COMMONNAME. Is this you again Giovanni? Long time, no see! +Not a massive fan of yours.... All things considered I AM NOT A MASSIVE FAN 81.158.98.66 +I agree with TenOfAllTrades that Brews's own talk page wasn't a really appropriate place to put the advice, which was the exact reason why I put my (already removed) remark elsewhere, but it was the only place where one could effectively reach everyone involved. Someone had to do it, so to speak. Like I predicted, I wouldn't work -| - +"Matt.whitby]] I assume you are talking of File:The Nines.jpg. I'm unfortunately not blessed with the gift of clairvoyance, so I have to go by what's on the image description page. You used the ""non-free image"" upload form for it, thus admitting it was not a free work. It was also very obviously a promotional image, of the type that is almost always non-free. You neither bothered to fill in the fair-use data, nor say anything about a license you had. Hardly helpful of you. If you actually do have a license – and I mean a fully free one, and evidence of it – then you are of course welcome to re-upload the file, with proper data this time. If you don't have such a license, please don't bother re-uploading, because even with a fully filled-in fair use rationale it would never stand a chance, being replaceable. ☼ " +" The followers of Claude Vorilhon call him ""His Holiness""; what do you think of that? If they called him ""Holy Father"", would that be legitimate? The pretension of a title does not mean that you ACTUALLY possess that title. The coptic ""patriarch"" DOESN’T have the right of being called ""His Holiness"", ""Holy Father"" nor ""Pontiff"", because these titles are CLEARLY and OBVIOUSLY CATHOLICS and they belong to the CATHOLIC tradition. However, your ""patriarch"" is COPTIC. You should be ashamed of doing so base usurpations and so unfounded interpolations. And, in addition to everything else, you dare to put your ""patriarch"" before the POPE. When editing the english Wikipedia, remember always that it is in the WEST, not in Africa. But the most absurd of all is that you want to have reason. I will say again, give up of your (absurd, ridiculous and illegitimate) claims. You know that the cause of all these usurpations is nothing but envy. By copying things of the Catholic Church, you acknowledge the inferiority of your religion itself. (I have a guess: you are William A. Hanna) 200.215.40.3 " +}== Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Haile middle) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +Do not place dispute tags improperly, as in when there is no dispute, and the reason for placing the dispute tag is because a suggested edit has failed to meet consensus. From the page you pretend to cite. Like I said, reading-impaired, conveniently so. Again, do not keeping believing other people are stupid. | Talk +Articles for Deletion nominations I see that you tried yesterday to nominate three articles for deletion, but you have to do more than just make an entry in the AfD daily log. The process is explained at WP:AFDHOW, and you should also read WP:BEFORE. Of your three, RouteNote has already been deleted. Nominating CD Baby should be straightforward; TuneCore is more complicated, because it has been nominated twice before, most recently at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuneCore (2nd nomination) (which I think shows the result you can expect if you nominate it again) so that your nomination will need to say (3rd nomination). Let me know if you need help. +, 14 February 2007 (UTC) LOL talk-email 06:57 +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fairfield Ludlowe High School, you will be blocked from editing.  —  Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. +Thanks for the suggestion. I slept it over and hope that you are feeling more up to answering my questions about the edit in question. Specificaly: has the community not gotten smaller? was it not caused by the automobile? have I not sourced the statement as asked? is it not a fact? is it not information? does it not help inform people as to why foresters falls is not as large as it seemingly once was? is it not the only peice of information in the article that bridges the span of time between 1870 and present? is the usfullness of the edit the only criteria used to determine if it will be reverted or not? All that I'm asking is for you to explain why it is better to not have the statement than to have it. As far as I knew wikipedia is intended to contain the sum of all human knowledge. As someone who lives near Foresters Falls I find that this information answers a pertinant question left open by the article (Why is foresters falls so small if it once had lumber mills and such?) I know that you said you don't want to continue this dialogue but I hope that you can understand that my frustration comes from the fact that you have, so far, not explained yourself. from my point of view it seems that you made the edit on a whim and refuse to acknowledge the possibility that it may have been a bit unwarranted. I found the information in a book on local history, I have listed the book as a source as asked. What additional criteria need to be met? please tell me. If I were to refrase the sentance? Would that be better? In fact if you could tell me what criteria was used to determine that it should be removed that would be fine. Because I'm sure that this sentance is no worse (certainly not because it doesn't detract from the page in the first place) than any other statement on any other page. Why insist on the removal of this perfectly sensible statement? Just because? Please answer this letter. Please do not throw another stock statement at me. Please do not respond to one statement I made in this letter and ignore any points you don't care to address. I would like you to meet me point for point and justify your actions. Please don't block me for daring to question administrators. Please don't interpret anything I have said here as a personal attack and ignore my entire post in favour of telling me not to post personal attacks. Please don't treat me like an ant under your feet who deserves no recognition. I will be in contact. +OMG dude that IS the photo here on wikipedia, the one listed above +REDIRECT Talk:Americana (Game show) +No way.. Duurdle's much higher.. talk +" Hello Linadolexxx, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility " +I agree. This is a complete and total joke. While I can understand possibly having bios on characters, to have such a discussion on the company is farcical. No wonder Wikipedia is laughed at so often.~~~~ +REDIRECT User talk:Eder Srld +This page serves to perpetuate self-describing myths about a person for which there is no public interest. Recommend this article for deletion. +" Connections to Jason Gastrich Welcome! Just so you know you voted in a controversial AfD that has recently been hit with a parade of suspected sock puppets and meat puppets. It would benefit you to mention how you came across the 5 day old AfD to make your first and only edit in two months, which is also your 6th ever edit. Especially, since it has been revealed that a banned user, User:Jason Gastrich, has been purposely recruiting people to vote in the AfD. Also since your first edit and only edit in two months relates to Jason Gastrich and his program to recuit ""keep"" votes, you should reveal any possible relationship you have with him. Also I am curious why your first and only edit in two months is on an AfD and your only edits relate to pages that Gastrich was pushing POV on during that time. Again, welcome. " +Here is, verbatim, the first patagraph of the referenced report: t is often said that there is a scientific “consensus” to the effect that climate change will be “catastrophic” and that, on this question, “the debate is over”. The present paper will demonstrate that the claim of unanimous scientific “consensus” was false, and known to be false, when it was first made; that the trend of opinion in the peer-reviewed journals and even in the UN’s reports on climate is moving rapidly away from alarmism; that, among climate scientists, the debate on the causes and extent of climate change is by no means over; and that the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature conclusively demonstrates that, to the extent that there is a “consensus”, that “consensus” does not endorse the notion of “catastrophic” climate change. +Which one from the above is my own synthesis? +" Don't blame me, had trouble editing at Codesnippets Hmmm...I seem to not recall being notified of the joke ban rule, and I recall you've jokebanned me twice. And you've jokebanned Rinn many times, and logged it on the IRC page. Do I have to say more? Bo " +She's a published author. Are you? +Re: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-05-07/Fair use OK, the policy is not stated specifically, one, and two, there is some discussion about images for each episode; however, the images here are random screen shots not tied to any specific episode. +We got felled. Ah well. It happens. It was definitely odd to see trolling which attempted to show Liefeld in a more favable light. ; Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. +" Arguably <10/week could be yellow, but I've been letting the colors lag quite a bit. Let's go one more reporting cycle. " +I think I hit all your points, and if not instruct me further. +lmao! Thanks TV2007, but I could have told him my self I wasn't reading that shit he put their for me to read +" You are a SLAVE! Don't you realize that you are a slave? You spend days, weeks, months writing little articles for nothing. A gold star?! Big deal. Your frinds Ruhrfisch, Coeil, and others encourage you because you'll spend your weeks writing for WP for nothing! I suspect you've had some tragedy in your life like a divorce or job loss and are looking to ""validate"" your worthiness by hanging out here and going for gold stars. How many do you need? Isn't this showing off? Isn't this looking for some kind of approval? ""Look everybody! I'm important! I got a gold star!"" Do you need to send every article through DYK, GA, Peer Review, and FA? Why? Send them straight to FA and have done with it. Don't you realize you're taking up every one's time with all of these unnecessary submissions? You're being exploited. Get a life. " +Linux article Linux and BSD are the SAME THING!!!!! Two names for the same exact thing. and by the way... its nto original resertch if i got the idea from a nother website. +Personal attack and unblock request +Yes, there's another page for band members at WP:MUSICBIO (the bit at the bottom after item 12). Again if a musician is only notable as part of a band then they generally redirect to the band. If they have other notability (e.g solo album, member of other bands etc) then they may get a page of their own. Any article that has been redirected can be restored by using the 'undo' option in the article history. +Dear Shem, all the Dolphin Class and Mariner Class vessels were actually built as composite gunvessels. The two Dolphin Class vessels were reclassified as sloops while building, and the 'six 'Mariner'' class vessels were reclassified as sloops on 26 November 1884. The normal practice is to list them under the type of vessels they were originally, so I suggest that you include both classes with the Lists of gunboat and gunvessel classes of the Royal Navy. I also suggest that the articles on the eight individual vessels (some of these may not yet have been written!) should be amended accordingly. +I disagree, it is not missing the point because early translations do not find fault with homosexual acts unless done for the benefit of a competing god. 64.31.174.130 MRM 9/16/2008 +" I'm feeling good In the last 8 days my user page has been vandalized 16 times. [[User talk:Sky Attacker| Sky Attacker'']] " +" Like I said, the comments were made by Khomeini, not anyone else - so they belong here. You can go ahead and add anything you want to any Rabbi's article. In fact if you read some israeli politician's pages you would find a lot of controversial sayings included. As a leader of a country, and especially as a religious figure, it's important to know Khomenini's views on non-Muslims. This is the only thing I've found so far. You can find other things and add them in if you want. Talk " +Fuck you bitch! I will go to your house and kill you with my gun! +P.S. I avoided the editor AndyTheGrump that has precipitated this trouble for a couple of years but the troll stalked me and jumped out to give me a line of garbage about nothing but a serious minded edit. +Snotty 17 year olds projecting their daddy and mammy issues on the world. Oh the joy of wiki and cyberspace. Hey kid, guess what you banned me asshole, now go back to your pathetic little life, and wank another for Shakira, that's what you do best isn't it? Wanker. +Royal Cruise Line This indicates very considerable importance, as a company operating multiple large cruise ships. That it's unref is a reason to add refs, and if one cannot find them, that's of course another matter '''''' ( talk ) +Fuck off!!! Go and buy some Andrex and wipe your rats ass/face (delete as appropriate). Fuck you!!! +What would help a layman... A little background. I have always loved languages. I am a native speaker of Arabic and English. I have been dying to learn Hindi. Thanks to Wikipedia, I learned that Urdu would be a better place for me to start since I can already read the script. However, I landed on the Retroflex consonant page when I could not read a few of the Urdu punctuation marks. For me, the most glaring omission on the Retroflex consonant page is a small audio file so I can hear each sound. Telling me what it sounds like in a language I do not know (like Swedish or Polish) does not help. I was able to copy some words to Google Translate and listen to them there but that was of limited use. I see that other articles have sound, video and animation so I do not think this would be a technical problem. Just trying to help. +the book is dumb this book is so dumb how could any one ever rad it .blahhhhhhh +Okay this person does not have this ip anymore. stop bothering me. +Ancient Warfare Hey Dirk. You gave a good answer to my question concerning the Roman tactics of bringing provinces into the Empire, and I read your similar question, and I may have an answer for you. There are a couple of major reasons as to twhy Alexander was able to take his army so far in so short a time. Alexander had the advantage of inheriting a great army from his father, and the Macedonian Empire saturated with, I believe, silver. Another major factor was the Persians they had a large army of hundreds of thousands, mostly conscripted agaist their will and treated very poorly. When Darius was defeated, he actually was treated like a liberator, and could have easily not only absorbed the remnants of the Persian army, but gained more volunteers. Anyway, thank you for your response to my question. ) +"and exactly which one of those was not appropriate to link to ""dubya""? -steve " +Fair enough. The standards have change through the years for what people think constitutes worthwhile for days of the year article, but that doesn't mean it has to stay that way or that it will stay that way. Having a new person involved can sometimes serve as a catalyst - or a new creative force. There's not harm in being bold if your intentions are good. Anyway, keep up the good work, +" Thank you, CrohnieGal! I'm still learning and guidance is much appreciated. Yes, I had attempted to replace the Facebook like to the Sante Kimes article because it is an external link related to Sante Kimes, however, I have now read that Facebook pages are not allowed as external links. So I will no longer attempt to add it. Also, if you could please help regarding the Sante Kimes article. Apparently, because I am a scholar of that case, along with many other court cases, I'm being perceived as a person attempting to alter the integrity of the information on that page. I have read that a user that insists on updates to only a certain page(s) is frowned upon, but is it not valuable to have a person who has extensive knowledge of a subject help construct an accurate article on that subject? In my opinion, the Kimes article is rather biased and one-sided as to all the facts and available sources about the case. Several of the sources listed in the ""References section"" have statements by Kimes that are apparently being ignored, in favor for statements by judges or third parties quoted in newspaper reports. Likewise, the sources named in the ""References section"" is, in and of themselves, biased. One very important aspect to the Sante Kimes cases has been her consistent plea of innocence and current appeals, however, that point is virtually ignored on the Kimes article. I'm glad you mention the pillars, because from what I understand, Wikipedia wants to display a neutral point of view on article subjects. However, the Sante Kimes article has a biased point of view throughout it. Several of which I have noted on the discussion page for the Sante Kimes article. It appears to me that because of who she is, her Wikipedia article is being influenced by public opinion. If you have time, please read the Sante Kimes article, and let me know if you share my interpretation. Sorry for writing so much, but I'm just trying to explain my actions. Thanks for reading and for your help! " +(Obviously the warning above by Raul doesn't count since Xiutwel didn't edit after it.) +" It was speedily deleted three times, twice for not being notable (which I don't think was really appropriate as a speedy deletion, but whatever), and the third time for being a copyright violation of this. Bachcell I'd say a couple of things here: 1) Don't create articles by possibly violating copyrights from other web sites; 2) Cheeky comments like ""other terrorism, er, whatever cases"" are borderline disruptive. You've made it crystal clear you think the Fort Hood shooting is terrorism, and it's terrific that you are a fan of the Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation, but neither of those things have anything to do with writing this encyclopedia article, and this talk page is not remotely the place to tell editors about an article you wrote that needs ""watching to make sure nobody speedy delete or AFD's it for no reason."" | talk | contribs " +The way *I* read the tvguide.com link, it's saying that his sister Cheryl is his BFF. +Contact Please email me privately. There's a matter I'd like to discuss. +" Blocked, considering his only defense is ""boredom"". msg me " +My personal opinion Is that you're a fucking wanker and I hope you die a painful death. 91.108.192.125 +Hey David, tell us... Are you taking it up the ass from Michael Lucas? Is that why you made those contentious edits everybody's talking about? Oh honey, say it isn't so! +" José Montoya Please remove links to José Montoya. It links to a different José Montoya, a poet and activist, who is not a Costa Rican swimmer. Read! Talk! " +January 2012 (UTC) Thanks for your message! I've replied there again. Have a good evening! Thanks, Talk 04:21, 16 +Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. phoenix +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dr. Paul Dhinakaran. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. [T@lk/Improve] " +" I nearly get blocked? Lol. I didn't broke any rule, I even was reported for breaking the WP:3RR and I didn't get blocked because I didn't broke it. Check the log. You even asked Spellcast to block me because you're not thinking clearly. How is he going to block when I haven't done anything wrong? You mad? It's a zero! " +kerch** Counter-terrorists win. Thank you. +}} {{Unblock|Impudent, feckless, dick. How dare you treat me thus. +" Requested move Hello J. 'mach' wust,I added my ""support"" vote to the move to Low Germanic languages. It was late in the evening when I voted and I had already made up my mind from the entry at WP:RM, so I didn't take much notice. Anyway, no harm done. " +many, many, many, many, many}} +Hi Anne! Do you remember me? +" Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites. Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies. Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources. No edit warring or sock puppetry. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so]. Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing. Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum. The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!" +This individual is either mentally ill, or is a criminal. This behavior should be reported to the ISP and the government for appropriate action. +"I trust you to sort that out. Iv supported you on the Bhagwan talk page. Contact " +Only a tip, you might want to think of starting a page like User_Talk:Barts1a/mentorship, which would be meant only for posts by mentor and mentored. +They are called Syed You dirty chump.Muhajirs are the worst race on planet. If the world-peace will be achieved if muhajirs and jews leave this planet. Muhajirs should be hunted down like animals. They should DIE!!!! DIE MUHAJIRS DIE MUHAJIRS! +REDIRECT Talk:History of British nationality law and citizens of the former Irish Free State +Ryan Braun Tx! How do we push this along? +" Ping I've emailed you requesting an admin opinion on a neutrality/bio matter. (talk) " +Wow. well can you at least block that one IP too? +Appropriate names== Excuse me, Logolist, but there's no purpose served by implying obliquely that the Germans of today have designs upon Wroclaw, Szczecin, Gdansk, etc., if that's what you intended above. Beyond that, you should understand that all these points of view about ex-German places that are part of post-1945 Poland have been made, aired, discussed, contested and reiterated ad nauseum on Wiki during the past couple of years. My own view is that these places were known to most of the world by their German names for a long time, which should be explained where RELEVANT, i.e. in any historical section. This is especially true of Danzig/Gdansk, given its unique history in the interwar period and internationally high profile politically. A secondary point is that these places where known to their INHABITANTS by their German names before 1945. There's nothing revanchist or revisionist in naming places with the names by which they were known to the world and to themselves during the historical periods involved. Indeed, it is linguistically revisionist, in a sense, to refer to Danzig (for example) as Gdansk when writing about the six centuries in which it was inhabited mainly by Germans. I've argued all along that the Germans today should refer to these places by their Polish names when referring to contemporary events – for the same reasons that they should be referred to by their German names when historical events are the issue. == +Actually the phrase doesn't mean anything at all to any reader. It's a completely redundant phrase, period. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is meant for its readers, not for its editors, and if another editor who is knowledgeable in the field doesn't understand what you're talking about, then certainly most readers won't either. You can't insert a phrase like that which has no meaning outside of context, into a place where no context is given. (Talk) +The above unsigned comment is another example of harassment by . Tipline +BNSF Railway photos Do you have permission from the photographer of the BNSF images from railpictures.net to release them under the GFDL or other suitable license? 15:56, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC) +I agree with this comment. I do not recall reading any peer-reviewed article that claims a link between smoking and meso. Lung cancer, for certain, has such support, with a debate as to whether the effect if additive or multiplicative. If I can find them again, I will post some sources. +REDIRECT Talk:Moisés Villarroel Angulo +":If that's an accurate IAST transliteration, then: . | ਸੁਖ | Talk " +" I went back and forth on your first and point and instead just focusing on comments made about the literature like the one I cited in the article just now. I'm actually fine with either. The sources don't actually give a range, sadly...so I just went and found the ranges myself! But I also think including in that at least some studies have been as few as 3 seconds would be valuable. ON your second point, that's been covered as you were writing this message to me! ) drop me a line (note: not a bot!) " +" Reblock Reblock that IP you unblocked earlier. GangstaEB (sliding logs~dive logs) " +Piss off you slant eyed-gook +REDIRECT Talk:Shabab Al-Bireh Institute +No problem you mindless robot. I reverted it back. Robots are as dumb as goldfish which makes them twice as smart as the human administrators at wikipedia. I'll bet there isn't a single published author among the lot of them. I've been published and this site is a joke. +REDIRECT Talk:2007 North Alabama Lions football team +" FYI Here is the content of the Monoplane article from Britannica. It's not an initial. Monoplane, type of aircraft with a single pair of wings. The monoplane design has been nearly universally adopted over multiplane configurations because airflow interference between adjacent wings reduces efficiency. The first monoplane was constructed by the Romanian inventor Trajan Vuia, who made a flight of 12 m (40 feet) on March 18, 1906. Louis Blériot of France built a monoplane in 1907 and flew it across the English Channel two years later. Monoplane design proved itself conclusively during World War II, and since then the craft has completely supplanted the biplane except for special purposes. Compare biplane Best regards. (☎) " +Fish name capitalization Although I'm tempted, I'm not going to get into edit wars on capitalization of fish species names. However, if you're going to take it upon yourself to go against the standard, please at least go to the trouble of changing articles throughout; by changing just the lead and taxobox, you're making most of the articles internally inconsistent in style, and they look ridiculous as a result. 03:48, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC) +britannica is just like wiki..if you want to reinsert this false statement(CITE BOOKS OR PROPER SOURCES) and IF U want to misguide readers then its your fault............ +Floods! The city is submerged! Here are some pics: The Grand Parada UCC floating cars! District Court my personal favourite. Most of the water supply has been contaminated, and the remaininder shall be exhausted pretty soon! The Mercy Hospital and the Kingsley Hotel had to be evacuated in the early hours of the morning. Here is a brief summary of events: Herald.ie. +" Online Tools & Documents Inc. spam on Wikipedia Domains http://www.13485store.com http://www.14000store.com http://www.the9000store.com http://www.16949store.com http://www.22000-blog.com http://www.22000-tools.com http://as9100store.com http://www.9001resource.com Registrant Online Tools & Documents Inc. 6611 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 United States Related domains http://www.iso9000store.com http://www.normas9000.com http://www.iso-9000-2000.com http://www.9001-training.com http://www.9001-info.com http://www.as9100resource.com http://www.ts16949resource.com http://knol.google.com/k/cynthia-weber Accounts :es:Especial:Contributions/208.42.19.200 (talk • contribs) " +FUCK YOU Fuck You keep blocking me I'll keep coming back, Are so fucking bored that you have to sit around and fuck with me on the goddamn computer. Get a life ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Lacking anyone else jumping in, I made a few minor edits in some of the directions you sugggested. +User Samaleks - instead of running around on Wiki user pages, sit here and talk. Relax. Let us discuss your accusations of Meat Puppetry, Un-Civility, Vandalism, Blind Reverts, so on and so forth. Also, please note this is Wikipedia not a privately mismanaged discussion forum filled with 'jokers' and that you may not have the same privileges and powers that you have on such forums, over here in Wiki. - MountainWhiskey ; +" Betacommand is back Hello. I am contacting you because you are one of the editors/admins who is still active now, and was aware of the notoriously disruptive editor User:Betacommand, a.k.a User:Δ (Delta). As you probably know, he was eventually banned after a third arbitration case, due to the way he conducted himself in the pursuit of his main interest on Wikipedia, WP:NFCC enforcement. What you may not know, is that he has evidently returned and has been editing as User:Werieth since 2012, in violation of that ban. After just a year, Werieth is already causing the same sort of disruption that Betacommand did - you may experience some deja vu by reading reports made about Werieth such as the one at the top of this AN archive. There are already several others. A quick perusal of Werieth's contributions will also reveal the same Betacommand-like self-assured approach, grounded in the belief that their edits are always ""100% correct and 100% according to policy"" (when the reality was that he made basic errors and pushed policy boundaries at a rate that, while acceptable in ordinary users for a time limited period, was found to be unacceptable in an editor with the edit rate and communication issues Betacommand had, especially given their inability to change) I and others have already tried to expose his return via these sock puppet investigations, although as you can see, it's not getting far. That's not for the lack of an answerable case though - you can see the latest summary in this post. Most of the obstruction can be put down to the usual dysfunctional and counter-productive aspects of Wikipedia governance, which of course will always aid experienced WP:GAMErs like Betacommand. But you may or may not be surprised to learn that the people obstructing this investigation the hardest are three admins whose own conflict of interest with regard to Betacommand/NFCC is best demonstrated in their own words - Black Kite (repeatedly deflects attention away from Werieth and onto accusers), Kww (blocks accusers, and has already unblocked Werieth once) and Future Perfect at Sunrise (has basically declared all out war on anyone who even whispers that Werieth might be Betacommand). The purpose of this post is to raise awareness about his return, and hopefully persuade one or more of you to resubmit that SPI with the evidence I'm sure you will be able to compile using your own knowledge of Betacommand's characteristic traits. At the very least to prompt you to put his talk page on your watch lists and regularly review his contributions (although obviously, don't waste your time trying to deal with any issues you see on the flawed basis that he is just any old user). Also obviously, you should also raise a red flag every time you see one of those three admins trying to further suppress the inevitable exposure of his ban evasion. If his return is to be covered up for an unnecessarily long time, it should at least be done simply through general incompetence, rather than obvious COI based abuse of the tools/trusted position of admin. A few emails to the arbcom members who dealt with Betacommand also probably wouldn't go amiss - if ordinary admins aren't bothered about this particular user's return (and you will remember, blinded by their enthusiasm for having someone, anyone, perform NFCC enforcement edits, a great many of them were unwilling to even admit his particular approach to that necessary work was a problem), Betacommand's clandestine return to Wikipedia is bad enough as it is given that he has simply resumed where he left off in the NFCC enforcement field, with several users already having wasted a lot of time having to deal with him as if he were a legitimate user. But obviously the nightmare scenario if the cover-up is allowed to continue for another year, is if Werieth/Betacommand decides script assisted batch editing is not fast enough for his liking, and decides to take an altogether faster approach - possibly even trying to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff;=prev&oldid;=43661105 +Polish Land Forces quick note: The Polish Land Forces disbanded the 1st Mech. Div. and the 1st Artillery Brigade. The 21st Podhale Rifles Brig. is now directly under the command of the Land Forces Command and the 1st Armored Brig. is now under the 16th Mech. Div. What has happened to the 3rd Mech. Legion Brigade I do not know. +" YES Recovery I have restored the article per your request, and sent the article to WP:AFD. There, the community will decide if the page meets guidelines for inclusion. If you have any questions, please let me know. Cheers... (talk) " +" Please inform Ladislav Mecir not to state that a reference titled ""The Unit of Account Issue"" by the FASRI is the ""wrong"" citation regarding ""unit of account"". Please be even handed and then also inform Ladislav Mecir not to state that a reference titled ""The Unit of Account Issue"" by the FASRI is the ""wrong"" citation regarding ""unit of account"". The Financial Accounting Standards Research Initiative is the best reference ever about ""unit of account"" in US GAAP as well as IFRS. Ladislav Mecir understands very little at the high IFRS and US GAAP level about accounting theory. I do. I work with this all the time. It is my field of expertise. Ladislav Mecir is making a fool of himself statind that the best reference is the ""wrong"" citation. Then, what is the ""right"" citation? Please ask him to supply the ""right"" citation. Apparently ""only"" he knows what is the ""right"" and what is the ""wrong"" citation for an item. You know that is not correct. Please be even handed and inform him to treat good faith editors with respect. He does not do that. If your are reasonable, then you will reprimand him for simply stating my reference, from the FASRI, titled ""The Unit of Account Issue"" which quotes extensively from US GAAP, US GAAP Framework and US GAAP Standards regaring ""unit of account"" regarding the item ""unit of account"". Ladislav Mecir, arrogantly and abusively, like always, simply - amazingly - states ""It is the WRONG citation""!!!!!! Can you believe that!!!!! Please inform him - as you have informed me - to be reasonable and to accept that a reference from the FASRI titled ""The Unit of Account Issue"" is the ""right"" reference about the item ""unit of account"". I would appreciate it very much if you could show your even handedness about this and reprimand him too. If you don´t, obviously then you will have no credibility. I am waiting to see you reprimand LADISLAV MECIR as well!! " +You are right, it sounds a little schmaltzy, what is meant by it is that he believed in non sectarianism, i.e. the the true meaning of republicanism not just in terms of Irish republicanism - again you are right if could be worded better. Have you any suggestions for an alternative use of the wording? regards +How dare you question Sir Ryan Giggsy? Just because his brother's wife came clean with details about their alleged affair doesn't mean this is a story worth investigating. If anything she should be put in the stocks for daring to sully the name of Sir Giggsy! +"::""Loathing"" is your word, not mine; I merely referred to whether or not it is a reliable source. As for your point, I am usually one to call others to task for invoking WP:BLP, but I think it applies in this case. We are always bound by WP:V as one of the five pillars of Wikipedia, but when what we are writing is potentially legally actionable against the Wikipedia Foundation, there is an urgency attached as well. My judgment was that the edit in question could not stay as it was written, with only the Post as a ""source"". I stand by that judgment. Nothing prevents a willing colleague from re-adding information...after a suitable source is found.    talk  " +I think 'trim it back' means slash it to a third it is now - taking down a fair bit of what could be considered low note primary supported promotional details. I don't see that much unduly promo story writing here to cause such a slash of the story. Considering the size of the article and the length of time they worked together (five years) and the official wrist slap on the wife, I don't see much problem with reporting it - my only problem was with the web links - only two - and one only from web archive, no longer hosted and [the other http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/therapist-who-told-podcast-listeners-to-shun-their-families-reprimanded/article4846791/] not exactly a worldwide link - a local one only - so there is only weak support, minimal reporting of the story by other reporters , wiki doesn't want to/isn't supposed to become be the primary reporter of the story - so I am in two minds about this story and as wp:blp directs caution I am leaning towards taking the story down +That rhymed nicely. +This article uses a massive amount of PDF files as references, all of them uploaded and added by the same user. Might be OR. +User:Eaglestorm/Konpeki no Kantai I noticed that you still had +Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. | Talk +WARNINGS This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Ed (Edgar181) LAST warning??? Try ONLY warning, fool. And if you jerks were'nt so snobbish and lazy, this crap wouldn't be HAPPENING now would it? 75.8.35.177 +I am sure they are all gloating. +The section could be expanded. +I think it's safe to say that busted ... only 22 reports, and half of them weren't even in the moderate/high risk area. +delusional twats on many levels. +" First you claim that Winehouse's drug problems are unreferenced therefore unsubstantiated. Do you think I was making it up? Then you claim that there are just ""person problems,"" even though they are the only reason why anyone over the age of 21 cares about here. That she is a singer is far outweighed by her lifestyle. Please don't start wiki disputes for no reason. This site has enough of that already. " +is it possible to publish a seperate artcile on the dangers of these issues to the fish popluation? +" I give up on you, I cannot believe you would go on after the RfA and use a term like ""Bushites."" How about it was a compromise that prevented it from being deleted based on not meeting its own requirements, since we are feeling with ""allegations"" its only appropriate the title says so. I really no longer care of you are desysop'd and am done defending anyone on that RfA since its obvious that even in the face of that the behavior continues. " +nothing much from you https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bishonen - +LOOK I just dont get why anybody from Fairfield County would be anything other than a Yankees or a Mets fan. We're not from Boston or New England or anything like that. We're from the NY Metropolitan Tri State Area. We root for our beloved hometown teams. +Time for another blocked IP address. Lets see how many I can do tonight. +I can't clean your shit +Nice to know you back nazi's +I'll correct what I said: The manis a former Coke user and in an incident challenged some kids to a fight. This is fact that are in his article. IMO that makes him a scumbag. +" Free super saver delivery alternatives - how to add content Hi. You deleted the ""Free super saver delivery alternatives"" page I created yesterday. I thought it had enough context (it talked about Amazon's free super saver delivery system, when it ended and listed the current alternatives in the European market), but apparently more context was needed. I am willing to edit the page and add more information (the whole idea was that other people could contribute as well), but it has been deleted and I cannot pick up where it was left off. How can one retrieve the previous version and complete it? " +"::This is by far the best attitude and the most helpful suggestions I have been offered here since joining, and I want to thank you for this. I am probably not blameless in my attitude and my frustration during the review process did cause me to make some statements there (which I though humorous at the time) which are now being held against me. I did try to mostly address the argument and not the person especially during AFD. I do feel though that I offered definite proof of bias during both AFD and review, and the act of doing this is now used to accuse me of personal attack. You can read and decide for yourself exactly what happened during review: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_February_8#Bruce_Copley I think your suggestion of ""userfying"" the article is really helpful and I should go that way. If you want to see the article, there is a Google cache at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:PV1AoAdknbwJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Copley+Bruce+Copley&cd;=5&hl;=en&ct;=clnk≷=za&client;=firefox-a&source;=www.google.co.za. Any questions and criticisms you have after reading the article are most probably already addressed during AFD or review, and I was busy responding to the last person's criticisms at AFD but did not have the chance to post before the page suddenly got deleted (so if you want I can send you this response as well). At the moment though I am happy to take a break, so I have no problem with waiting 7 days! I want to thank you again for your constructive offer of help and I really wished you had joined the discussion earlier. Best, " +Wikiproject North East England In addition, I was wondering whether we could get the North East Portal up and running again - you obviously spent a lot of time making it last year. Thanks! '''''' talk +Good luck. Gig em! +" I can proove that the disney page was last changed on Sat. 2007-02-23 (by HTTP response headers) Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 P3P: CP=""CAO DSP COR CURa ADMa DEVa TAIa PSAa PSDa IVAi IVDi CONi OUR SAMo OTRo BUS PHY ONL UNI PUR COM NAV INT DEM CNT STA PRE"" From: DOLHIGHWEB01 Cache-Expires: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:43:54 GMT Cache-Control: max-age=300 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:42:03 GMT Last-Modified: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:23:41 GMT Etag: ""8044e8818857c71:14a2"" Content-Type: text/html 200 OK and was created (at least) at 2006-11-05 by reading the page source. Maybe a site prior to this was released at 2006-01-18, but this would mean, that this site was also used while the movie was still showed in (european) cinemas. var axel = Math.random()+""""; var a = axel * 10000000000000; //document.write(''); document.write(''); All codes here were taken from the Disney page I linked above. I hope this brings true light into the dark. " +" J.Delanoy, you are a fuck'ing moronic asshole (Come ""pwn"" my sockfarm if you are able to, I've saved up a few socks and vandalised some obscure pages!) F U C K Y O U 218.186.8.234 " +" President of Israel I don't understand the problem. Acting presidents are not counted as presidents (or Katsav would be listed as the 11th), so why include them in the succession box. Based on this, I didn't think it was worthy of discussion, so I was WP:BOLD! 57 " +There's no need to question my grasp on reality, Martin. I had provided a link to a professional review that called into question the songwriters' sincerity on the point of the album being intended as satire, but it was deleted. But if all we're interested in is the band's intentions, that's fine. I'll waste no more time on this.65.69.204.131 +" Some baklava for you! i love takis and hot cheetos " +I edited the article earlier to fix when it was released. It was listed as November but it did come out in October. I known because I've had it for a couple of days already. +" Not quite everyone; some of us are still willing to drop the Puppy a tidbit every now and then. But KC does occassionly offend the type of editor who might reasonably be described as ""aggressively ignorant"". I can't for the life of me imagine why.... Tropics " +" Expanding claims of mistreatment with other witnesses 29-Apr-2010: It is time to greatly expand the section about Claims of Mistreatment, to include numerous other sources. Originally, that section was quickly created to begin the topic. At first, the issue was treated as a ""he said she said"" dispute (when there are no other witnesses than just the 2 sides making claims). However, now, there are probably 10 or 15 witnesses to add into that section, including: In June 2009, Knox testified they repeatedly asked, ""Did you hear Meredith scream?"" and she replied no, no, and no. When they insisted how was that possible, she claims that she said, ""I don't know; perhaps I had my fingers in my ears."" That became: ""Knox put her fingers in her ears when she heard Kercher screaming"" (invented false confession). Knox's father attended those trial hearings and he confirmed her statements as consistent with his conversations with Amanda, for years. Knox's father stated that a female officer linked to hitting Knox was charged with beating another suspect. One of the police officers (from that night) testified that Knox was so pressured during the intense interrogation that she starting screaming (not hearsay). Patrik L. (Knox's boss at the pub Le Chic) stated that he was also pressured and threatened by police officers on the same day. Author Douglas Preston, in several reports, has stated that he was also pressured and threatened by the same prosecutor, and commented about that in relation to Knox's testimony. All such statements are allowed, per Wikipedia policies, because they are not WP:SYN synthesis, but rather reported in single sources describing the claims of mistreatment. The current text of the section must be expanded per WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:NOTPAPER. Expect the article to exceed 200kb, when similar basic details have been added. - " +" Lol, you know I had considered asking you to go through them before I reverted them, but I just know how much *I* hate when someone drops by my talk page and says ""hey there's a really difficult job that needs doing...can you do it?"" ;> Good work, all the same. =) – (talk) " +Wikipedia right now is in the fight for its life to regain credibility after the Seigenthaler incident and it is users like you, who selflessly fight to maintain decorum and NPOV that keep the beliefs and hopes that Wikipedia was founded on alive. For this, I'm proud to support you in your efforts to become an administrator and will be glad to have you working towards truth, civility and credibility. +":It doesn't even seem that an amendment is subject to the P-5 vote, but that all of the ""Permanent Five"" must agree to an amendment. Yes, that seems to be an entrenched clause. What is strange is that many of the Members do not adhere to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but can still be Members. " +Grab your pocket protectors!!!! +Teachers, when covering this subject, walk a fine line between sticking by the principles of science and not insulting the God-fearing people of this country. A lot of school districts are getting away from teaching evolution altogether, and spending scarce classtime covering other aspects of current theory, that don't provoke so many lawsuits. This is a sad, sad thing in my opinion. 22:40, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC) +" We don't have sources that would qualify under WP:RS, but there are a few blogs that have been posted about this. One blog I do consider ""reliable"" (in terms of information, not what Wikipedia would call ""reliable"") is Joe Murray's blog. I'll try to not add my personal analysis to this comment, and end it here. (t) (c) " +which currently reads like a fanzine +I will fuck the whole wikipedia!!! +" Oh, and here too.  Asenine  " +so wut u got asaulted boo hoo u probly luved gettin fuked in the ass by 2 hott gays +" No I think you are right in closing the discussion, BTW the whale was just me poking fun at you! '''What? And you got mail" +Page moves Hi there. For future reference, please don't move pages by copying and pasting, as you did with Bill Garner. Rather, use the move tab at the top of the page, as it preserves the article's edit history. Thanks. +This has now been done by the appropriate party. Many thanks. +. Surely we can find a better one? +" I just update them as I see NFL transactions.►''''''Holla! " +It looks to be a valid folk formula. It should go back in. Only 98 Google hits (ten for version with numerals) for that exact phrase, but they seem to show it as a widespread if not A-list meme. I can see why, it works pretty well: it approves a 14-year-old dating a 14-year-old, 16→15, 18→16, 20→17, 22→18... 26→20, 30→22, 40→27, etc... that seems to match about the usual limit before people (or the minor's mom) will give you THAT LOOK... In other words, its a pretty good objective description of the limit of what's considered proper, which I would think would be pretty darn useful to a reader... Obviously we are talking about the United States and/or the West in general... if necessary that could be stated... in the English Wikipedia there are many articles which assume that you are talking about the West unless otherwise stated. +" Climate change topic ban rescinded Thank you for your many valuable and patien contributions to the topic area of ""climate change"". After weeks of self examination I have reached the inescabaple conclusion that I have made a horrible mistake in unilaterally banning you despite being asked to reconsider by several admins. I was blinded by my own obvious lack of neutrality in this topic area, and hereby fully and abjectly apologize for this completely unwarranted ban. Happy editing ). - 2/0 (cont.) " +I am perfectly within my rights on Wikipedia to edit my talk page as I see fit. No user shall edit my page unless they are adding additional, relevant content. Irrelevant content shall be removed. +" The video is available from YouTube under the title ""1939 German-Soviet troop parade in Brest Litovsk"" In YouTube the video clip can be blown up to full-screen size. Runtime:02:14. Original commentary in German would require translation. There's also another video clip in YouTube called Nazis and Soviets in occupied Poland in 1939 with still photographs from the invasion. Runtime 02:42. It has a fairly good resolution which would allow for a series of screen-shots to be uploaded to Commons. talk " +"And also here you took out Sony Music even though it should be ""Sony Music/Columbia"" like we had agreed. " +there is nothing more for me to discuss and I don't even understand why I needed to discuss all of this *again* in the first place to explain my reversions. So +(UTC) The World is The Pictorial World (see this), which was apparently published in London from 1874 to 1892.. 04:32, 14 December 2015 +" ""AFL"" is the only non-ambiguous, universally understood name for the game of AFL in Australia. So can I go and ask for every AFL article to remove ""Australian Rules"" or ""Football"" now? " +" TFD closings Thanks for helping out with clearing the TFD backlog. However, I hope you don't mind a couple of suggestions... If you close a decision as ""keep"", please edit the relevant template, remove the deletion notice, and add a link to the debate that resulted in keeping it. If you close a decision as ""delete"", please list the relevant template in the holding cell at the bottom of TFD, so that it can be properly deprecated and deleted. Please don't make closing statements as ""keep until Mediawiki updated"" unless you know that such an update is actually forthcoming. Please don't invalidate votes because they refer to uselessness; lack of usability is a good reason for deprecating a template. However, as you correctly say, ugliness is not - that would be a reason for editing the template. Yours, adiant_>|< " +, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Howabout Guiteau & Czolgoz. 17:13 +"Here are the scans from the official manual of the game: http://i.imgur.com/omsJPjm.jpg http://i.imgur.com/tXc3J0n.jpg http://i.imgur.com/2Tr2ySt.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ON39M6v.jpg Verdy_P's logic essentially amounts to ""If I don't see it, it doesn't exist"" and ""I don't care about a subject, but I am always right.""70.51.38.110 " +Thank you for accepting it, I look forward to working with you in the future. Auroranorth +Don't flatter yourself mate. I just wish that my edits wouldn't get your attention and you'd just leave them alone. +Thanks for experimenting with the page Church of Christ, Scientist on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. t • @ +" Let's leave it alone for now; I've just made an ""editorial"" edit, so I'm probably legitimately involved now, even if I wasn't before, but perhaps compromise is possible. As far as stopping an edit war with a semiprotection, the best way, of course, is to block the edit warriors, but the dynamic IP editor could skate right around that. Anyway, sorry to bother; the situation isn't what I thought it was. " +And which country would gain free benifit? +I'm going to suggest we start making moves to have this distruptive, trolling IP blocked from editing until such a time when it is capable of understanding standard Wikipedia policies. +[Chorus: DMX - repeat 2X] Where the hood, where the hood, where the hood at? Have that nigga in the cut, where the wood at? Oh, them niggaz actin up?!? Where the wolves at? You better BUST THAT if you gon pull that [DMX] Man, cats don't know what it's gonna be messin with a dog like me, D-to-the-M-to-the-X Last I heard, y'all cowards was havin sex, with the same sex I show no love...... Empty out, reloaded and throw more slugs How you gonna explain born in a man? Even if we squashed the beef, I ain't touchin ya hand I don't mess with chumps, for those to been to jail That's the cat with the Kool-Aid on his lips and pumps I can't deal with brother that think they broads Only know how to be one way, that's the dog I know how to get down, know how to bite, bite Bark very little, but I know how to fight, fight I know how to chase a cat up in the tree man, i'll give you cowards the business for messin wot me ay you crazy! [Chorus x2] Where the hood, where the hood, where the hood at? Have that nigga in the cut, where the wood at? Oh, them niggaz actin up?!? Where the wolves at? You better BUST THAT if you gon pull that [DMX] Once a song, I come though, guns is drawn BLAM BLAM, lungs are gone, sons will mourn From dusk till dawn, nighttime belongs to the dog On the street passed midnight, look for 'em in the morgue Don't play with these cats cuz I ain't got nothin to say to these cats For the mothers that really do love em, please pray for these cats Cuz I know they all is hardheaded but I ain't got the patience Don't want me havin no patience turn into more patience More trips to I.C.U cuz I see you Tryna get away with things a real wouldn't do Where my dogs at? (right here) See them niggaz? (right there) get em boy! (right there) That's how we do... (aiight then) This is for my dogs, this is for my dogs yo, where we at baby?!? (creepin through the fog) From then till now, don't ask me how Know that we gon roll like them chaps and hit every block on the job [Chorus x2] Where the hood, where the hood, where the hood at? Have that nigga in the cut, where the wood at? Oh, them niggaz actin up?!? Where the wolves at? You better BUST THAT if you gon pull that where the hood at?! +File:IS0.50AtlantiumStamp.gif listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IS0.50AtlantiumStamp.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +" But origin of this word came from the Tatar language,and means ""blue-yellow""." +Calling a dickhead a dickhead is not a personal attack. Sorry, but if he fucks with my edits again, I will call him a dickhead again! +Fuck you are an asshole! Why be such a prick an stuff the wrong date in there just to piss me off! +I explained the stalking that never was (explained that I received a harrassment warning and nothing bigger), and I have been alcoholic before my meningits. Hardly 'resume' material, but you chose to delete it not me. I am sure you can trawl through the user history to find it again. Still trying hard to give you what you want - in fact you have it all, you can choose what you want for the article. Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by (talk • contribs) Articleman11 +Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Snowman +(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) +Your question on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) You recently posed a question on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)#Questionable use of Wikipedia content? concerning the questionable use of Wikipedia content on http://www.recipeland.com. And you asked to be notified of the answer on your talk page. Well, at the very, very bottom of those pages is written: Copyright ©1996-2004 metro.isp Inc & Sean Wenzel All rights reserved. All Wikipedia text is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License; The original article can be found at: www.wikipedia.org (Talk) +I agree with everyone else who's stated The Saints don't belong to be mentioned alongside the other bands. I'd even argue Australia doesn't deserve mention in the lead, as the movement was so minimal compared to the other two, though this might require some rewording of the intro. +, or a bad application thereof +hooray, the page is locked I can go do something more useful now, like go to sleep. +":::I really don't think anyone is denying that stalking by groups which includes gangs is a real thing. The problem is the use of the term ""gang stalking"" by a very small minority to describe a completely different phenomenon, one typically involving super-secret conspiracies, often equipped with high-tech psychotronic/paranormal weaponry. apparently with vast budgets and unlimited manpower, targeting ordinary people. That these ideas are apparently bizarre and unbelievable by normal standards is not the issue here weird and implausible-sounding things like MKULTRA and plots involving cats with surgically implanted microphones have actually happened it's the lack of evidence that both describes this as a real-world phenomenon (not just a belief) and meets Wikipedia's multiple-third-party-reliable-sources evidence standards that is the core problem. " +Singapore hasn't been part of Malaysia since the 1960s and the second trial didn't even commence till 2010 +Librairie l'Insoumise added to AP. +That's as maybe, and yes, I did see that the template name was (), and I do know what citation means, but my point was: why did the template come up on the article as 'FOR TESTING ONLY ()'? Anyway, wall done for replacing it. 15:46, 21/03/06 (UTC) +Last warning for suppourting sock pupettry As discussed on Total Siyapaa talk page this is your Last warning for suppourting sock pupettry. +Ok, thank you for your help, I will try that now. +yes, i've already said this. sentinel (MHS) had it's own page, with 'proper' citations, and apparently all references to it, including those citations, have been deleted. +How come he is a founder of the British & Foreign Bible Society (founded in 1804) when he was born after that date? +one intresting note is, the +Not that it matters, but where are those court documents? I see only secondary sources paraphrasing the defense argument. +Even worse is the fact that the original includes a link to a compilation study by Stanton A. Glantz, PhD that says vapers continue to smoke combustible cigarettes. The study referenced another study that only looked at a 30 day period. This man is a rabid anti ecigarette advocate that has been found to twist statistics to his own anti-ecigarette bias. All the study did was rephrase others work in a way to make it look like the opposite that was found. The proposed section looks more balanced. +"Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Policy on neutral point of view Guideline on external links Guideline on conflict of interest I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! | talk to me " +length? + origin of life This article is horribly long with a long list of redundant sources. Also it's understood that evolution is a theory about the progression of life and not it's origin. The current origin of life section doesn't say enough to convey that. +Then you should also tell the same thing to ) +Fucking krauts Learn to speak English you fucking dirty kraut! +Please comment here: Talk:MMR_vaccine_controversy#How_to_include_this_in_this_article. +The editor wanted me to apologize for labeling his actions racist, and I have done so. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→ +" Ororiod people Ha! I was worried when I saw the article that I had just missed it when looking for it earlier; checking the page history though, it was created today, so I can't feel too bad. Thanks, ➪HiDrNick! " +THIS IS THE WORSTEST SONG EVER MADE IN THE HISTORY OF HISTORY OF HISTORY!! MY EARS WERE FALLING OUT THERE SOKITS WIL I WUZ LISTENONG TO THIS STUPID AWFUL TRASH DISGUISED AT HALLOWEEN AS 'MUSIC' IS AWFUL I HATE KATY PERRY %$Y AND HER SONGS ARE A PRIME CAUSE OF DEAFNESS AND OO OPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO +I am going to pull your pants down and insert a large phallus into your bunghole. I bet it's going to be the only action you got in years, you fat tranny. +Eat Horse Shit!!!! You are a fat nerd and you smell like cat pee. Go to Hell! +Propaganda terms are inappropriate as titles Please let's choose something else. +" Hello, Tgeorgescu... It was correct what you added, sourced, and valid what you put in, according to context, and according to WP due and undue and sources. Your edit and addition were valid and correct, and arguably warranted, and I would never revert what you put it, because it happens to be referenced and sourced and what's stated by majority scholarship on this issue. So it was a valid modification and elaboration etc. To what I put in, that was also sourced. As WP policy recommends, ""modify instead of wholesale deletion"", to improve not remove. And again, the point of Wilson and Cahill was in the context of the very section and paragraphs themselves, of rationalizing or explaining why Egypt herself never chronicalized things like the 10 plagues or the Hebrew exodus out of Egyptian slavery etc, or the destruction of Egyptian charioteers and soldiers or of that then reigning king of Egypt. Of course majority historians discount it ever actually happening, but it's also known and admitted (as a general point) that ancient pagan nations or kingdoms in general would not always be so honest or straightforward or complete in their recording of everything. Embellishing some facts and details, while minimizing or even totally hiding others. And that was really the point. Anyway, thanks for your work on it too. It was a bit blunt, but it was quoted correctly. Regards..... " +I'm so sorry. I thought that Luna and I had something and I just blew up when i realized he on purposely did not respond. +ledgend status although this is not something that can be technically claimed, i think it has to be mentioned the status that he has gained as ledgend online and on T.V +" List of Notable WDHV Releases A list of notable WDHV releases might be seen as merely duplicating List of notable Disney feature films and, as you said, Disney's released a ton of stuff, and every compilation doesn't need to be listed. ) Something like ""List of notable Disney videos,"" focusing on non-feature films, might be okay. Also, in the main WDHV article, a section listing the most important or major releases would probably be okay first videotape release, first DVD release, first sellthrough-priced release, etc. — (talk) " +" Yes, I am unblocked now. Thank you so much, Jaranda. And just to prove that I'm gonna work harder on my issues, feel free to block me if I begin to do the same thing again... just please don't block me without a real reason ) ''''''(talk) " +Your Ali Revision Hi, Zora; I thought about your latest revision on Ali regarding the events that occurred shortly after Muhammad's death, and concluded that it is a vast improvement over the past versions. For one, it is far more preciseit is far from clear upon Muhammad's death that Ali's followers thought Ali SHOULD succeed. What is more clear is that once Abu Bark assumed the caliphate position, his followers did think that if anyone, Ali should have been the successor. Excellent work. I'm just going to do a very small revision clarifying that it was not only Ali's friends and followers but many other Muslims who thought Ali should have succeeded. Don't want to give Shi'a zealots another excuse to raise hell =) +I have not a clue what your issue is with what I've said. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→ +Charging Bull?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charging_Bull +Titanium Page Dustin, Alan Gamble here, from Metal Suppliers Online. This is day one for me in understanding how to add information to Wikipedia articles. I'm spent my career in the field - 32 years in all, and in 1995 I created www.suppliersonline.com. I personally researched and wrote every word of our property data pages and was interested in finding out how to share this data with Wikipedia in an open source manner. Unfortunately, my first clumsy attempt was flagged by you. My apologies. Here is a link to some of the property pages I've created: http://www.metalsuppliersonline.com/propertypages/index.asp Any thoughts on how best to share this? Alan Gamble Metal Suppliers Online +I wish if I had someone to tell me I should keep my eyes open when I was entering the movement. If these accusations are not true, people would quickly see they are lies. If they are true why are you afraid of the truth? +Thanks, so are you ! 18:21, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) +Choral singing is a popular pastime in Sweden, and on Walpurgis Eve virtually every choir in the country is busy. Singing traditional songs of spring is widespread throughout the country. (for Gerda) +" Sorry dude, if my behaviour is rude. But i am thinking in opposite way, you are thinking. Actually i am in a imagination that lead section should be small. Previously you have shown me an good articl'es example. But somewhat i am not happy with your opinion. That's why i am doing like, ""Removing repeated info & Release dates info from lead section in all article's"". That's the problem. From now onwards i promise you, ""I will add all the release dates info to my 12 telugu film interested article's in English Wikipedia"". Actually my previous telugu film interested article's number was 24. But now i have reduced my work due to lack of time and power cuts for more than six hours in Guntur in A.P. state. So don't bother about that ""Bro"" because i don't want to hurt you again. Sorry!!!. At last i have understood clearly. Hey!!! Some good news for you. See below.[User:Raghusri|Raghusri]] Raghusri " +Now you attempt to deny data. Data given by a global luminary. I think it is obvious to everyone else where the true bias lies. With you and your self-serving rewrites. You are just trying to stroke your tiny ego. I ask you to please take your abusive behavior somewhere else. I have reported you. +GAR Thanks for the heads-up. Looking over the nomination, I agree with the rationales listed so far. Hopefully somebody works to address the raised issues to help the article retain its status. Happy editing! (talk • contrib) +Removed Links May I ask why you removed the link to CueTracker from Mark King's page? I had cleared with Armbrust that these links could be added. ( ) +"* This article says that he was the first Hispanic, but according to Cardozo biographer and Harvard Law professor Andrew Kaufman, ""so far as I know whether one was 'Hispanic' was not an issue for Cardozo in his day. I don't remember ever having run across the term in contemporary relevant writing,"" 1. I remind everyone in this discussion that Wikipedia requires reliable sources and does not publish original research or gives undue weight to minority views. ''''''mundo " +" Lol, I was thinking to myself, ""What's the most childish thing a person could do in this situation? Maybe pretend like it was the last comment that was the final seal on the block?"" You disgust me. (talk | contribs) " +Shapiro> The formal structure of a theory may be mathematical in nature, and the ontology of mathematics is a subject unto itself. For example, the thesis of mathematical structuralism is that mathematical objects (if there are such objects) simply have no intrinsic nature. See +Hey, Bishonen, what about me?! ) I'd really love your opinion of the argument I had with Jossi yesterday regarding whether or not Rawat called himself saviour of mankind, Perfect Master, the incarnation of God himself, etc. as per the quotes I provided. What does it take to have someone banned from editting an article for dishonesty? Would John Gotti's kids be allowed to stand watchdog over an article about their father? Thanks, +"please research into feminist periodicals on superiority == Feminist newspapers and booklets may have reported, quoted, or published well-known feminists as proponents of superiority or supremacy (likelier the former), particularly in the late 1960s and the 1970s. Many such papers had largely local circulation in various locales with some copies arriving nationally and some are available now in microfilm in libraries (at least, Bell & Howell published Herstory: Women's History Collection (microfilm)). Best wishes and thank you very much. please research What Women Wanted, in Stanford Observer A specific source on superiority that I don't have is Freedman, Estelle B., What Women Wanted: Varieties of Feminism in Nineteenth-Century America, in The Stanford Observer, Jan., 1978, perhaps pp. 3 & 7 (The Stanford Observer published by Stanford University & since renamed Stanford Magazine or The Stanford Magazine (news.stanford.edu)), which is cited in Offen, Karen, Defining Feminism: A Comparative Historical Approach, in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 14, no. 1 (Autumn, 1988), p. 125 n. 12 & 139 n. 43 (pp. 8 & 22, respectively, in PDF viewer software) (JStor or JStor's stable URL, both as accessed Aug. 28, 2010, 2:48p) (author was of Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford Univ.). While Stanford University's library probably has this on hand, it appears to be rather costly to get a copy, and, as far as I know after checking WorldCat.org, no copy is near me. I hope someone has a copy and can edit the Wikipedia article accordingly. It is also very possible that the superiority referred to has nothing to do with women governing whole societies, but perhaps is only about a ""moral"", biological, or essentialist claim to superiority and not governance. Best wishes and thank you very much. please find critiques of supremacy generally Criticisms of the superiority or supremacy position are implicit in most equality claims, but they probably should be articulated. At the moment, I don't think I have them (except for what I've already added to WP plus some to come on matriarchy). Preferred are two kinds: those by feminists (there's probably a passage in an interview of or an article by Betty Friedan, for example) and those by antifeminists (although some likely exaggerate and conflate all of feminism with superiority aspirations and object to the whole, rather than state a specific objection to superiority per se). Best wishes and thank you very much. (Corrected the syntax of the first sentence to conform to that of the next sentence: ) whether Les Guérillères community intended as relatively modern I think Monique Wittig's Les Guérillères, the 1969 novel, was meant to be relatively modern or futurist, and thus so was the proposed female state. This is suggested by the words ""rifle"" and ""bullet"" in the novel (Wittig, Monique, trans. David Le Vay, Les Guérillères (1985, © 1969), op. cit. (cited in the draft), p. 141 (""rifle"") & p. 132 (""bullet"" & ""bullets"")), in contrast to an existing interpretation of the fiction as Amazonian, probably meant in a sense other than ancientness. The ages of the English words rifle and bullet, about 2–3 centuries (per Shorter Oxford Eng. Dict. ([4th ed.]), could be irrelevant if her original French words, whatever they were, were old enough and meant ancient weapons or weapon supplies used for war. To avoid this factor being deprecated as original research from a primary source, is there a secondary source about the feminist state's intended time frame other than 1969? == " +The pun regarding SPECIFICO's username and adding the rolling eyes are the bit which is incivil. +hmmm funny how homogeneous Armenia is! Hardcore ethnic cleansing anyone? +Though, I think Arthur should get his own article, I'm a bit hesitant on this others, though I have no real objections. +That's only an estimation. We have no way of knowing what date he was born on. +what a complete fucking blowhard he is +G'day Mackequine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thankyou for your work on Wikipedia, and I hope you're having a great time. Unfortunately I have had to flag your article about Equine guided education as a possible advertisement as it sounds more like marketing material for the Cartier Equine Learning Cente than an encylopedic article. I have summaried the issues I have with it on its talk page and would really appreciate you having a look as I'm certain you know more about the subject matter than I do. It is always a pleasure to have new users join Wikipedia. I hope that together we can make the equine guided education fantastic. +2010 (UTC) Done Add sort by number of associated routes 06:45, 11 May +Every reliable secondary source gives the last name as Dandridge. +Eater gothamist and gawker are the lowest tmz scandal gossip rags. Not reputable sources. These articles are written by famewhore troll douches. +" Shackleton's death Shackleton's death is discussed before the section entitled ""Death and Legacy."" Should this be corrected? — " +The last edit was not a revert 79.97.92.28 +Also about G1 Brawl you know he looks like a Mammoth tank and his image shows so Please look.( ) +I agree with you, Jeremy, but the more detailed info should also be included due to enclopedic relevance. A compromise would be to include both the general and the detailed info to cater to both the beginner and the more advanced reader in neuroscience. +Batwoman's introduction T-man, please see my comments at Talk:Batman#I added regarding Batwoman's introduction to the comics as a response to Wertham. I believe I have found some good source material. Trying to be civil! +MLB.com is cited for facts in baseball articles, yet its neutrality is not challenged. What's up, Doc? +The Smugness of her face I edited this page added, the correct assursion that she is well known for having a smug face. This is true, why are my edits being reverted? +Something factual about low educational standards, high levels of crime and social disadvantage are justified providing superlatives like 'dubious claim to fame' are avoided. +":::The lede should be factually accurate as it stnds. I do not believe that ""self governing"" is factually accurate, but including the text ""enjoys a large measure of internal self government"" is accurate (or at any rate can be attributed to both the GIG and the FCO websites. We should therefore either remove the words ""self-governing"" from the lede or incorportate some kind of qualification such as the phase above. " +Reply to Reply Reply to the previous paragraph: Ok, i was not aware of the nofollow attribute. Also, I have found a good link from your site to be put in the link list, and that is the part of your site which is also relevant to the article: http://www.omisinfo.com/omis/about-omis/ As for you paying taxes in Croatia being a reason to have a right to put stuff on Wikipedia...please, get serious. I also invested money, time and energy to build the financial basis for my life, and yet I do not feel that it has' to be advertised on Wikipedia becase I put so much effort in it. Anyway, AFAIC, you are free to change the article as you wish. I will not object, there is no point. +I have removed it. 96.26.213.146 +". Trudeau wasn't the Leader of the Opposition, Mulcair was. Ergo the Liberals weren't the Opposition, the NDP was. Therefore the Liberals could not, by definition, form a ""shadow cabinet""." +Lol u make me laugh, u really believe that John Cena, Randy Orton, Edge, Chris Masters and the rest are better than the wrestlers in TNA? TNA is way more inivitive than WWE, I mean Vince as ECW champion, talk about running out of storylines... Jay316 +" Standardized register Croatian (hrvatski jezik) is a standardized register of the Serbo-Croatian language... - to claim that is simply not true, because ""standard"" Croatian is not only Croatian language. Standard language in Croatia is Serbo-Croatian, or batter to say - some form of West Serbian language. - so there is no dispute about that. However Croatian language, real Croatian language (one you can easily find in thousands of books, epics, poems...) has nothing to do with Serbian language. That is something no one seems to understand. Croatian language is almost extinct language which haves no Institution to govern its development. Today in Croatia, Croatian language is forbidden, and is used only in everyday conversations but not by public media, government... or other official institutions. The term vukopis is used to describe ""violence"" done to actual language by changing Croatian language to almost unrecognized form by political force and totalitarian Yugoslav régime. That Serbian (better to say ""Vukovian"", because vukovians are Croats as well) violence is the only reason why today's ""standard"" Croatian language is almost the same as Serbian language altogether. Kratko i jezgrovito rečeno: prošlost je jezika hrvatskoga sjajna, sadašnjost mračna, budućnost neizvjestna... U djelima se (ranijih) književnika zrcali pravo biće jezika hrvatskoga, pravopisa i porabe jezične. Sve je to obrazbeno blago u XX. st. odvrženo i poslano u ropotarnicu poviesti... Budući nam je izvorni književni izraz hrvatski iz mozga bez traga izpran, ... unatoč mnogostoljetnoj svojoj poviesti, hrvatski je jezik danas lišen prošlosti. - Bulcsú László Briefly and succinctly said: the past of Croatian language is a great, the present bleak, the future uncertain... In the works of the (early) writers reflects true being of Croatian language, spelling and precise use of language. All this is slightly transformed by the twentieth century, overthrew and sent to the dustbin of history ... Since our original Croatian literary expression has been from our brain washed without trace ... Despite its many-century history, Croatian language is today devoid of his past.- Bulcsú László This is the stand of preeminent Croatian linguists, so the article needs to express this, and say that ""standard"" Croatian language is Serbo-Croatian, but Croatian language isn't. Exapmle 1. Kolo od srieće uokoli vrteći se ne pristaje: tko bi gori, eto je doli, a tko doli gori ustaje. Ivan Gundulić Exapmle 2. Svit je taščina. Taščina od taščin i sve je taščina, ovi svit jest osin i magla i hina. Marko Marulić Exapmle 3. Nut poglejte kako srićučlovičanski ljudi išču: ki z navukom med knigami,ki z oružjem med vojskami; ki u dvoru prislužujuć,z neistinom prilizujuć, drugim na zlo potverduju,što je krivo potribuju. Ali srića je bižeća,malo kadi obstojeća, vsi ju žele, nasliduju,retki pako dostiguju. Fran Krsto Frankopan Reading this examples, one can clearly see that Croatian language has nothing to do with ""standard Croatian"", with Serbian or Serbo-Croatian language. " +" BTW: I have made several typos in my post. I have left these for you because you have stated that you ""love to mercilessly edit and correct these"". Are you a teacher/child-minder?" +While it undoubtalby true that Freeman's Samoan expertise was far greater than Mead's, and despite your claims it would be easy to source that, the small change I have been trying to make, which is proving to be like pulling teeth, is simply that Freeman's relevant research was on Samoa. Do you dispute that? Where should I go to complain about you? +" do you have a source or atleast any kind of logic to be using vague and confusing wording like political strongman please do not misunderstand i am a supporter of dictator and absolute ruler but i do not support misguided nonsenseFREESAVELIYtalk " +Please don't create personal lists (that is, lists that don't belong in an encyclopedia) in the main article space; I moved your list to +" Gerhard Weikum & Gottfried Vossen (2010). Transactional Information Systems: Theory, Algorithms, and the Practice of Concurrency Control and Recovery (ScienceDirect Google Books) spends two pages on the topic. I don't seem to have access to the full text, but this would probably give a good indication of the depth to which this article should discuss the topic. Professional NoSQL has a short blurb that could further help to establish notability. I had considered nominating the article again, but I'd probably still vote ""weak keep and rewrite"" again. —'''' " +" Oppose Avoid readers at Isiah Thomas (disambiguation) having to do a double take on a Isaiah Thomas (basketball) entry when the primary topic, Isiah Thomas, is also a basketball player. ""Isn't this the same as the primary topic? Why is it listed twice. Ohhhh, there's an extra 'a' on this one. Sigh."" AFAIK, this is the convention when the primary topic and a non-primary topic are in the same domain. See Jordan Adams, male basketball player, and Jordan Adams (basketball, born 1981), female basketball player.— " +French Tarot and French Roulette French Tarot and French Roulette can be corelated as follows: 0-+ 1-1 2-2 3-3 4-4 5-5 6-6 7-7 8-8 9-9 10-10 11-V 12-C 13-D 14-R 15=1 16=2 17=3 18=4 19=5 20=6 21=7 22=8 23=9 24=10 25=11 26=12 27=13 28=14 29=15 30=16 31=17 32=18 33=19 34=20 35=21 36=* That permits to use French Roulette as random modifier while playing French Tarot. Zero can be used as special modifier. +" Large number of abandoned drafts I suggest you work on one and only one, and bring it up to the standard required. Then, once you have learned how to do it, improve the others to that standard and then and only then, resubmit them. Faddle " +" ""See also"" ""See also""... ""List of Cowboy Bebop voice actors""... And it's a red link. That's just stupid. Whoever did that should have actually made the list of voice actors first... ""See also: Nothing!"" ... worse than trivia sections... " +"==Eric Clapton== I'm afraid the citation you provided for your recent edits ""Miller, Patricia A.(2003)"" is quite inadequate. Who is Patricia Miller? Is the source a book? A journal article? A magazine? A broadcast? The purpose of a citation is to allow the reader to find the source. With only a name and a year, that is not possible. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for details on citing sources. I'll give you a brief time to fix this. If it remains unchanged, however, your additions will be reverted, per WP:V. Thank you. " +Children's author? Apparently he wrote - or was credited as writing - children's books. Should we add this or is it too WP:TRIVIAL? /(talk)/(contribs) +Khosrow, It's harder to find who is Turkic with DNA but It's what I add the population with Turkic speakers. Do you add 250 million Iranian with DNA testing? )) I will definitely change it! +Why was I blocked? I don't see how I was blocked for contributing sources unlike the other guy who thinks what he contributes is accurate. +User MShake Vandalizes alot of pages including the Mania page recently should we report him? I would back you up on it if you wanted to do it. +Status and Advice As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article, not necessarily because of no indication of importance, but because it was a purely promotional c.v. A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release list everything a person does; write in paragraph format about the key points of the education and career. Be aware you will need to write the articles to Wikipedia style; a good place to start learning it is our guide to writing Wikipedia articles . First, give the basic informationthe source should be the CV birthplace and date, degrees, previous positions. If there are published books, list them in formal bibliographic style. List the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science. Include major national level offices and awards, but not minor ones. Be sure to list editorships (but not mere editorial board membership) we consider it very important, and you should add it to the articles for the relevant journals also, with a link to the bio. It is not necessary to cite the basic information in detail to other than the official CV. For any part you quote directly from a published bio, include quotation marks and a reference. Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of press releases or web sites, which are usually more expansive. As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page. '''''' ( talk ) +" ""First, I honestly don't care if your different or not."" Now that is a lie: ""I have a hard time not being that you are really not DrPizza since your argument starts with another thing as if you were DrPizza. (sic)"" You only say you don't care now since it's been revealed you were wrong. It's another instance where you shift the argument when you've been proven wrong and engage in a smear campaign. And what do you mean by, ""behind your back""? That would mean that he would've said ""idiot"" somewhere he knows you're not going to look (like, say, the History tab, which you don't seem to know about). Presumably, someone who bothers to edit the NTFS page would clearly read its associated Talk page. So, once again, you've failed to provide the evidence, and again, shift blame and bring up wholly irrelevant issues to cover your tracks. It reminds me of Michael Brown being questioned by Congress. You've failed to demonstrate you had the correct facts. You've failed to justify your ideology that wikipedia should only be limited to what you deem ""mainstream"". And you've failed demonstrate any evidence for your ad hominem attacks, instead, insulting our intelligence by pointing out blaringly obvious facts and insinuating that we are stupid (unlike DrPizza, your language leaves no room for such doubt, and your profile clearly indicates you have no issues with the North American dialect of the English languageOr are you going to backtrack away from your earlier broken argument about language and intention now?), and casting blame in all directions, hoping it sticks somewhere. These are signs of gross immaturity and a complete failure to be able to put forth a rational, logical argument. These are your faults, not ours. Not DrPizza" +Ok i know that everything i write is 'closesly' followed. Now, approfiting of this for once, i want to fit the above paragraph in the main page. Before it happens, someone is able to intervent here and eventually discuss the thing? If not, i'll post it soon. +Does anybody know what is the date when Makemake was designated as dwarf planet, and what is the date it was assigned this name? +I'm fine with an accurate-but-obscure name being used. I wish the Therianthropy article had the references linked to the text, but at least it has some, and relies on more than movie references. +Never mind - the redirect seems to have been explained, in that the MEN took over the Chronicle in the 1960s. +" No i'm not. Just in the same way that someone may say that Bondi is a ""beautiful"" beach, i think it can be said that the elimination was painfull, appeared unfair or even, dare i say it, cruel. " +" A tag has been placed on Sanjivani mashi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +" The Great One! I dont really have a problem, i just dont like you very much, u see i dont make many edits and im not one to taddle tale on vandels, and do u know the reason 4 that? its because i have this little thing called a life, i log on every now and again and make a few edits and for some reason when i do i find that some loser has got something to say to me, attacking my views on subjects that are of no concern to them, they dont care about subjects yet they go to the page to complain about the page itself ""disturbed are shit"" ""Motorhead are not metal"" and i shoot em down for that, then some faggots have a problem with me telling them that. and now u have done that, i made my peice then thought ""why should i listen to a poofter like him"" so here i am again, u are a faggot nerd burger! u have managed to make me h8 u without me even knowing u, u are the biggest poofter bogan i have ever encountered on wiipedia and to be honest, if i had the chance i would probably cripple u! go back to ur gay orgy! go root ur mums boyfriend u fat sack of nerd shit!. kind regards " +DreamGuy, screamGuy I see he just cannot stay away... his skeptical hackles are up. He nitpicks and instead of helping with minor edits, he deletes. WHAT A GUY!!!!! He should improve his own bad page, Mythology, which needs BIG TIME HELP. hAPPY nEW yEAR, DG. beckjord +I promise I will not attack or make uncontributive edits anymore +Just looked at the original again and it's wrong over there too! +WikiProject Puerto Rico in the Signpost The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Puerto Rico for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. +(UTC) I completely agree, not only does the guy have penis problem + but the 2 figures are extremely anorexic aswell. Someone may also be partially motivated to promote exaggerated stereotypes. The picture before with moderate figure had been used for long time and is good representation of average human figure. (talk (talk • contribs) 8:40, 9 march +" I see. Then, very regrettably, Wikipedia is crippled from its birth, suffering from an inherent, incurable disease: its disregard for truth. Such policies theoretically allow the building of articles comprised mainly of false contents, simply by providing ample references that in turn are false, claiming they are ""reliable sources"". And that is just what might be happening right now to a sizable proportion of the 3-million-plus articles, making Wikipedia unreliable per se. That's very saddening indeed. I just knew Wikipedia was too good to be true: now, evidently, it is true that it is not that good after all. It's more than disappointing, more than dismal: it's just nauseating. After more than 2,500 edits, I feel like quitting: I have stopped being a loyal believer. " +hi Dave6 ive posted this on the clairvoyance talk page after someone completely removed the clar#irsentience article which had gone through a process of months of work , rewrites , endless discussion , removasl of personal matereal , edits for style and content .... endless work on correct sourcing and wikpedia referencing and formatting..... the article which had been arrived at with co operation and discussion over many weeks and v man who himself put some hours into grammer , punctuation ... re editting for stlye and content ... and much help in correct sourcing and referencing ..... this article was the sum of many peoples input , effort and hard work so i dont know how or who removed it so thoughtlessly and put the meaningless redirect to the clairvoyance page... any help would be great.... cheers.. hi guys i see youve redirected the clairsentience article.... let me ask....what was the point of the weeks of discussions and rewrites if you guys were going to redirect it anyway....you should have told me t get lost out of here...... what was the point of it all? why did i listen to you ? at all? why did i remove all personal references? why did i reference and source all of my matereal diligently and in great detail ? why did i edit and re edit for style and content ? why did i make additional references to religios , anthropological ,socialogical , philosophical ,medical , physics , chemistry , botany , mental health etc so that all views were included and respected? why did i fulfill all of the above hurdles and hoops to fulfill wikpedia formatting and guidlines for you too to delete months of hard work and effort. your actions are without integrity or honour ..... clairsentience article redirect ? Hi ..... whoever removed the clairsentience article and made it redirect ... can you please try and respect that the article that was there had evolved over a couple of months of discussion and many rewrites and multiple edits which involved much discussion over a long period...... .........i could delete this clairvoyance article.... but i wont because revert and delete wars then stupidly take place which is a real shame when a library becomes a bar room brawl...... ..... i hope you can respect the clairsentience article... ..... ive been clairsentient for most of my adult life and it wasnt easy to come this far and to struggle for decades to articulate my experience in a way which makes rational sense to the world at large of which the clairsentience article is a manifest example..... so please try and respect the vast amount of struggle and work which has gone into it.... +Reply to my account! - +the opening Hi, contributors; good article, but the opening needs surgery: Johann Christoph Pachelbel ['paçəlbεl] (päkh'əlbĕl) (baptized 1 September 1653 – 3 March 1706) was a German baroque composer and organist. He was an acclaimed composer and organist during his lifetime, and was also regarded as an outstanding teacher. Today Pachelbel is considered to be one of the most important organ composers of the middle Baroque Organist mentioned twice; composer three times. Can someone remove the repetition to make a punchier opening? (Or I will.) +According to Gnostic Mysticism under the guise of Mandaeism, he is reviled for being so. +" Schroeder is the self-appointed spokesman for the ""scientific community' despite not being qualified in science himself. And he feels free to dismiss statements by recognized leaders in cosmology such as George Ellis, first because he is a ""theist"" (Schroeder only wants theistic opinions if they compromise evolution with the Bible or claim that the Bible teaches absolute geocentrism). Then Schroeder decrees that Ellis, Hubble and Hoyle are extremists, and insists instead that an unnamed ""scientific community"" on whose behalf he speaks says otherwise. 07:38, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)" +" I don't understand what that comment is supposed to mean. Regardless, there are published sources in the article that make the claim. It is not MY opinion that the two structure are related. Other scholarly sources are making that claim. If you want the article to state otherwise, then you need to provide the sources. —'''''' {chat} " +Not sure how putting an invisible note helps while this info is much solid than is being used currently. What blatant copy from other website are you talking about? Don't just make up things as you go. +Hi Rama Left reply on my talk page +Article name post move SkyWest was founded in 1972, but I think Old SGU was around longer than that. Also, the end year should be 2011 instead of 2010 right? +'m personally attacking you. Racism. It makes sence because most of us are violent. Talking about personal attacks. +Suitecivil your a pussy ass bitch i'd fucken kick your ass any fucken day you little bitch face cunt fuck you and fuck barcelona. +Thanks for working on it. As much as I appreciate the work (which I appreciate a lot), I am not too crazy over the layout. I did the design on Word, and if you send me your e-mail address(mine is osbus11@yahoo.com), I can send you the doc. +Okay, thanks for letting me know. +" Archive (magazine) Hi. Thanks very much for your input at Archive (magazine). Regarding the delinking, that was included based on the template documentation. I've now updated the /doc page because I agree with you. Cheers. " +What is the source for the Chomsky quote? +KInkaid Stinks Kinkaid is a school that not only captures and uses the student as slaves, but also turns thier blood into energy +i am sorry but please get me more friends on roblox the only i have edited this time is because i dont know how to contact you +" INeverCry Thanks for the kind words. I've found that most of the greatest writers of all languages are unworkable here on Wikipedia; Sir Walter Scott, Lord Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley, The Brontes, Lev Tolstoy, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Gustave Flaubert, etc will never be GA or FA (or if they make it somehow, they will never retain it). I'm sure it took a huge effort to get Chekhov to FA, though the article seems to have been given a bit of a break on quality requirements for some reason or other. One of my biggest problems is the eternally unfinished state of Wikipedia. Alexander Pushkin, Nikolai Gogol, and 100s of other articles used to be GA or FA, but they were demoted because editing is left open after an article is promoted, allowing them to be destroyed by ""average"" editors if there aren't vigilant babysitters watching. The other thing is that lovers of classic literature will usually find more info on their own out of a deep and abiding interest about writers and works than could ever be made available here. So who are we writing these literary articles for? A true reader will search things out like an Antiquary, and how many of those use Wikipedia as a reference? When it comes to writing articles on individual works, I favor reading the works themselves, rather than some trifle of an article, even if it's ""scholarly"". I won't even start on the strange pseudo-government and society of Wikipedia, the invitation into which I must've misplaced. I used to read 5+ hours per day, and I miss it too much. I'm going to start on Waverly soon and the other volumes I have of Scott in Penguin and Oxford, with the preparation of watching the BBC history of Scotland with Neil Oliver. I'll take a look at this page and my ""old"" talk page occasionally, so if you leave something for me I'll see it. (INeverCry) 71.94.14.136 " +dated prod|concern = confirmed sockpuppet] of the main author of the other article. |month = May|day = 7|year = 2009|time = 22:48|timestamp = 20090507224801}} {{prod-2|1=Direct copy of socialism, currently being discussed for Afd, created by confirmed sockpuppet of main author the first article. +the time of the year m=ch s=gi +Yep, I agree. Right now I can't be bothered finding reliable sources. Would you mind doing it? (talk) +":Dunkin's Dunkin Doughnut was killed when they went to a commissary system. The automated extruding machines employed by the company to form its donuts could not handle the handle. (blah blah • I did it!) " +Democracy in the Middle East Please explain why you reverting my correction at Democracy in the Middle East page. If you have dispute please either explain here or add references to all that text you are reverting. +" Good suggestion. 66 " +" You know, I use a static IP. Yupigo ? " +No, no problem at all. In fact, if I were the original admin on the issue, I wouldn't have blocked at all. Thanks for looking into it. +I see that you've now reduced the duration to 24 hours. How about you simply lift this vindictive block? +no he is not gay whoever said that is lying because i bought his DVD n he said he loves girls especially the shy ones n he says all his girl fans are his girlfriends! n he kept asking about where the girls are from place to place because he said that it's not fun to perform if there aren't any girls around +" Equation in text I see the following equation at the beginning of the 2nd paragraph in this entry: 3.14 * 89 + 85(4962.36 + 6972) The equation does not appear in the ""edit this page"" tab. I haven't really delved into editing the Wiki, so I hope you'll pardon me if I'm showing my noobness. (I also haven't posted in the ""discussion"" tab before, so I hope I'm doing this correctly.) EDIT: Nevermind, the equation has now disappeared. Yes, it was removed by me yesterday. You were probably watching a cached version of the article. Next time something similar happens, you should do a hard refresh in your browser: Ctrl + F5 will do in both Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox. Command + R if you are using safari. (Talk ° contribs) " +" Unspecified source for Image:Zionicrew.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Zionicrew.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. talk " +Okay chum, will do so. +"{| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""| Hello Ben Hall13! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes ""~~~~""; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:white;"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top""| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"" ! The Community |- |style=""color:#000""| Community Portal • [[Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User|Adopt- +SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK MENEW +can A Perfect Circle be removed from thelist of nu metal bands then? +" From WP:Fringe, ""Ideas that have been rejected, are widely considered to be absurd or pseudoscientific, only of historical interest, or primarily the realm of science fiction, should be documented as such, using reliable sources. Ideas that are of borderline or minimal notability may be mentioned in Wikipedia, but should not be given undue weight. Wikipedia is not a forum for presenting new ideas, for countering any systemic bias in institutions such as academia, or for otherwise promoting ideas which have failed to merit attention elsewhere. Wikipedia is not a place to right great wrongs. Fringe theories may be excluded from articles about scientific topics when the scientific community has ignored the ideas. However, ideas should not be excluded from the encyclopedia simply because they are widely held to be wrong. By the same token, the purpose of Wikipedia is not to offer originally synthesized prose ""debunking"" notable ideas which the scientific community may consider to be absurd or unworthy. Criticisms of fringe theories should be reported on relative to the visibility, notability, and reliability of the sources that do the criticizing."" " +I was just asking something I was just asking him something. Why did you treat it as personal attack? +Doooddeeeeee..... Oh My Gosh Man You Better Not Switch Or Report Croydon Tramp Get A Life AHHHHHHH LIFFEEEE +Please stop this diletantism, both of you. You obviously do not have enough knowledge, the fact that YOU cannot find the primary sources, is no proof for anything. Just copy down what secondary souces claim and do not destroy this article even more; it is a huge mess already now. As for the appanage system: actually the principality of Nitra was far more than that, under Svatopluk it was more or less an independent state, but probably a vasal to Moravia. A good proof are papal letters addressed to this region, which the pope writes to Rastislav, Svatoluk and Kocel, treating them as three equal rulers. There are many such subtle things you just cannot know, especially when I look at the sources stated in the article which are mostly outdated and not the primary scholarly books that should be used nowadays. So please just stop these ridiculous guesses, speculations, fillings of gaps (which are your personal gaps as a result of lacking knowledge) and original research. The article has no value in this form, it would make more sense to make it much shorter, if you are unable to acquire and cite the relevant sources. +"I think hats are only supposed to have a link to the ""possible other target"", but I could be wrong. " +o feel sorry for you, fuck off you american bastard +Endorse Op Finish edits +" what people must know well i'm a malaysian guy and i have to say what i really see, if we look to The total length of the Gulf coast about 3300 meters, the share of Iran which has about one third only and the rest belongs to arab countries, also if we will look to the side of Iran we will find them arab people persianized but originally they are an arab people who want to get out of the iranian government and make their own arabic country. more over look to the Roman & Ottman Epires and u will not find the name ""persian"" also because i understand arabic i checked in this site what is written in arabic then i found the map was using the term ""Sein Arabique"" then i wish that my arab friend get the name because in the time while the persian empire was strong they change that name while they was in golden age it doesnt give them the right to make it standred name. No Referance for the Sheikh Saeed House's Map, what do you think? false allegations False alleations and fake maps have been answered []. Please don't delete information, maps, documents and historical citing from ancient historian without cosulting other editors of this page ahead. This is organized vandalizing! You mentioned a website that is Iranian and represent Iran's POV and cannot be neutral or reliable to judge a ""fake map""!!!. Wikipedia and not affiliated to the Iranian government and doesn't represent one-side of ideology. This page is semi-protected not to be destroyed or vandalized by IP address users. As editors here, you should not praise such behavior and immediately revert the page to its last preview. Radical changes to refelect one-POV is not accepted. This behavior is going to be reported to Wikipedia adminstrators. Please consider helping instead of damaging or orienting. Ralhazzaa The maps you have presented aren't anything new Ralhazaa. I can't believe people keep having the same discussions in this talk page over and over again. and everytime the discussions reach the same conclusion, but then after a couple of weeks another person starts the same pointless round of edits. To be very brief (these have been discussed in length in different sections of the talk page and it's archives): 1. The maps you mentioned were proven to be inaccurate and were corrected in their later versions. verified through several articles and sources. 2. The UN resolution you mentioned does not pertain to ""international"" bodies of water, but to bodies of water that are shared between two or more countries. There is a difference. For example Shat-al-Arab is a river which falls under that category. But international waters do not fall under that category and the UN geographical names committee approves the standard international name for them. To ralhazza. First of all we have discussed all issues here. There does not exist a single textual evidence for Arabian Gulf. We have about 300+ maps and 8 maps you brought from different books all have maps of Persian Gulf and their newer edition have been corrected. It is all there and you can not insert a POV without discussion. Read it again: []. Why aren't you bringing newer maps from the newer editions of those books and mentioning that texts calls it Persian Gulf? Perfect truth is not attainable like this. Show all POVs boys! Hi all, In this page, ancient referential maps, citations from historical books, UN resolutions and policies is going to be added in brief to balance and neutralize this page, as many users wanted through this talk, considering the policies of editing on Wikipedia. Evaluating “Undue weight” cannot not to be decided only by small group of users, logically. These maps are going to show different side of information and represent different POV (not just by Arabs). Medieval maps, classical history references, UN organization reports related to solving dispute in geographical naming should show both POV for giving more neutrality in this page. Other users are required not to violate the using of references by saying ""It is incorrect!"" or ""False"" as long as it is apparently Ancient, Referential, Internationally Accepted and Used, Showing different POV(s) and Neutral. References should have adequate level of credibility and neutrality of author/source/provider/maker. Questionable references is something like this one as it is pr +" Portal is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.'' " +":This has drifted off the topic of ""notable"" being in the title. You can have list members who don't have an article, but if you can find the info to make an article, it's good to do so. For the Eagle list, it functions quite well as we maintain in with standard wiki rules, but in the Maine senator case, I can see your point. — • Talk • " +Image copyright problem with Image:Video card.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Video card.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. +If you don't like the format, edit the format instead of reverting the post. The comments may need polished, but they belong. There CANNOT be a discussion of ANY of the recent Patriots success without mention of the cheating. For years the players on the field have been saying that the Patriots somehow knew the play calls before they themselves did. We now know why. To not address this is just WRONG! Pats1 even considers a discussion of the cheating as vandalism. WTF. 71.99.139.118 +A tag has been placed on Image:Z08.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: inappropriate image Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yeah MaxSem is right. If you continue to upload inappropriate images, You will be blocked from editing wikipedia +CJ would probably take over Grove ST. Familys if Sweet died. - +Add redlining information Perhaps if Redlining(specifically the racially biased practices of the HOLC) were given a bit more nod in the 'government aided white flight' section the questions related to POV critiques of this page. The HOLC map on the top right of the page would be good, for example. +Sorry that I've been dilatory in responding. You're right that apparently the powers that be don't require footnotes for every list item. Our list is very good, so if you want to nominate it, I certainly have no problem with that. Maybe someone else in WikiProject Chess would have a better idea than I of what our list's chances would be - Sjakkalle or SyG, maybe? +"needed, and the Minor char. one would fail notability. As for the other three, Edward and Bella fit WP:N. Jacob...I didn't merge because he's considered one of the main love-triangle characters and there's a possiblity that more info. will be available. If nothing comes up, the page will end up merged eventually. Right now, no one has really attempted to clean up the articles, but they are not in really bad shape compared to others. Bella Swan has a nice sized concept/creation section and a large reception section. Edward Cullen (Twilight), though lacking concept/creation and reception notes, has a large Film Portrayal secrtion. Jacob Black really needs work, though. Personally, I'd like people to work on the actual list. It needs reception and concept/creation notes, not to mention referencing from books and dialogue. Nah, I don't think so. Stephenie Meyer realistically spends too much time writing about how gorgeous Edward looks (seriously), and even if she had described her characters in more detail, all the character articles would be classified as stubs. There's really no need for so many stubs when we can condense them all into fewer pages. The Olympic Coven In the back of Breaking Dawn, where notes on all mentioned covens are writen, the Cullens' information is under 'Olympic Coven' should this be mentioned anywhere? Delete ""if published"" (paragraph 2, sentence 2) Go to ""June 2008 Update"" —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Meyer announced that the book was on hold after that June update, in August 2008. (talk) Criticism Would this be a valid source for criticism? blastmagazine.com The columnist analyzes the Twilight series and calls into question the books' overall writing issues, story and character development, and controversies in how it presents gender roles and how those could negatively affect the young fanbase. I know the source is a blog, but if the writer (Kellen Rice) had credentials that made her article valid, would it be a good source? I can't seem to find her credentials, though, so any help would be appreciated. Twilight explicitly described as 'porn' Something to the effect of the frequently surfacing description of Twilight as ""softcore porn"", ""girl porn"", and similar should be added to the section on critical reception. 78.34.180.107 I disagree that the opinion of one person who writes for a school newspaper is worth noting. (talk) And I presume you're googling your fingertips off trying to find another source for the claim. 78.34.132.44 Harry Potter versus Twilight A passionate debate has raged online and in many teen circles about which is the ""better"" fantasy book series: Harry Potter or Twilight. Team Read, an after-school literacy program in Seattle, recently conducted a student debate where two teams hashed it out. Afterward, a panel of judges and the standing-room-only audience voted 120-40 that the Harry Potter had won the debate. In a separate vote not related to the deba +" and Then i was Walking down the street in India and It Was Gandhi and He Was All 'i don't eat the Smoked Meats but Toddt he's So Gay""" +In order to prevent further image problems, I have selected a coke image that is public domain. +" Personally I prefer ""scientific consensus"", since ""scientific opinion"" does not make it clear that there is, in fact, a scientific consensus. " +" I put the asterisk in so that it appears at the top of the categories page, rather than under ""L"". I have seen others do this, and I think it makes sense to have ""List of"" pages appear at the top. 11:57, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)" +"Just noting the caption now reads ""Perth, Western Australia is one of the most isolated regional capital city in the world."" City should be plural now. User:thux2828 30 June 2008 " +Be nice and don't be a dick, or I will kick your ass. +are you still undoing what i upgrade on NOAH'S ARK PAGE? ARE YOU?. IF SO, WHY? +" Singer, new factoid With superb timing, I've come accross a new Singer factoid: the tax-form they filed for www.sepp.org for 2008-(2009) , lists Frederick Seitz as ""Chm"", presumably ""Chairman"". But he died in March 2, 200. Oh dear " +" I had ""my guy"" who's pretty proficient at balancing images for light/dark go over Image 1A, and re-uploaded it, so what you're seeing after this comment is actually ""1A prime"". " +No, Douchey McDouchenstien, I'm angry that anyone who edits a page that you personally don't approve of, you revert and claim vandalism. You are the enemy of Wikipedia. I added in that he has also been called Interceptersaurus Rex and you call it vandalism? Why? Because I'm not sucking off your beloved QB? 214.13.192.187 +Please delete my biography You copied the Daniel_Brandt bio into a /Brandt subdirectory on your user space on June 14. That article no longer exists, but your copy is now indexed in Google. I consider this a WP:BLP violation. Please delete it. +Ignorant & Unhelpful i've made numerous valid statements on correcting the eye color page and yet you continuously ignore me and aim to prove me wrong because you seem too obtuse and self centered to even bother listening. I'm afraid i'm going to have to lodge a complaint to wikipedia about how unhelpful and oblivious you appear to be towards peoples pleads on talk pages when making valid statements of corrections. +And it all started when he stuck Rapid Prototype devices in the Self-replicating machine site for his budy Adrian Bowyer. +Nanotechnology, the science of the small, derived from the Greek word Nano meaning dwarf is already available in the market in form of many products. But, We have created this talk page to discuss what are the latest developments from Nanotechnology in the field of architecture, construction and the built environment. +|listas = Master Of The Beighem Altarpiece +" ReferenceBot – Skrippner User:A930913 Page: Diff: Comment/question: Someone with the alias ""Goblin Face"" is making unauthorized changes to the Stanley Krippner bio page. Skrippner " +" Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 574 " +dare classify it beyond Afroasiatic +MANY updates on www.russianspaceweb.com/2007.html Could someone please help? +Looks like Cydebot is down! +" I don't know which portent is more ominous, that as I brought up my first article of the day for investigation it had an orange bar indicating your message, or that when I clicked to respond here apparently my computer and my internet connection and the Wikipedia site seemed to all stop working, each with different symptoms. Let's try this all over again shall we? I can't say I'm ""happy"" to help, but I'm determined to help. ) And I get to read all kinds of neat stuff, sooner or later someone will ask at the Reference Desk about ""who was that songstress from the 40's or 50's who had a smoky voice and lived somewhere in New York State?"" and I'll be able to say ""Oh that was [Rose Shannon], we have an article on her...well, we -had- an article on her..."". ;) Thanks for the candle, but what we really need here in Vancouver are images of snow! Anything to give some possible indication that there is an actual winter in the Winter Games. " +Seasons Greetings ]] +Opinion sought With reference to [[this discussion, I would like to know if phenetics and numerical taxonomy are one and the same. Would be grateful if you gave your opinion here or at the discussion or even privately on my email if you so prefer. +P.S. Oh, never mind. yes, please have those rouge rules in place, but please see the Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Liancourt_Rocks/Evidence#Faking.2Fasserting_non-existent_consensus. The current version does not go with consensus. Also, I disagree nearly completely with your focus on me & Clownface @ Liancourt Rocks. ( ) +Much New News Today Two officers charges, 4 on paid vacation, I put the details in the Fullerton POlice Department (California) merge? +Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Millard West High School. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. 83 +" Now you're just being biased. I never vandalized in the first place, and that's the problem here. When that Skylights guy posted that tl:dr diatribe about me on the admin board he quotes me twice. But only it was quote mining that made me look like a troll. He failed to add my reasoning for adding the link: ""They clearly demonstrate the fear and paranoia that would fit the description of someone that would wear a tin foil hat. If someone were doing a research paper on tin foil hats and they needed additional research then Alex Jones about would be a good example.Rothchild (talk)""My intention was never vandalism and when I saw that my name was linked to the admin board and he wrote all those lies about me I was shocked and appalled. I guess I kind of over reacted. It was a bad first week at school. " +" First, I think it was SatuSuro who made the version about the Faith that is now on the page, and would like to thank him for his research and work. Both of the quotes I have added are verifiable, I can post the references again if necessary; they are not original research; they are also impartial in presenting the Faith's teachings because they do not attempt to sway a person one way or another about what to believe about them but rather present them directly because they ARE the teaching. Anyone elses summary of them could only be inaccurate. There are no major disputes as far as I am aware about the Baha'i teachings about the life of the soul after death. This summary of the Wikipedia article about a neutral point of view I believe is exactly what applies here: When we discuss an opinion, we attribute the opinion to someone and discuss the fact that they have this opinion. For instance, rather than asserting that ""The Beatles were the greatest band ever"", locate a source such as Rolling Stone magazine and say: ""Rolling Stone said that the Beatles were the greatest band ever"", and include a reference to the issue in which that statement was made. Likewise, the statement ""Most people from Liverpool believe that the Beatles were the greatest band ever"" can be made if it can be supported by references to a particular survey; a claim such as ""The Beatles had many songs that made the UK Singles Chart"" can also be made, because it is verifiable as fact. The first statement asserts a personal opinion; the second asserts the fact that an opinion exists and attributes it to reliable sources. Also, the Baha'i Faith has been consistently among the top three fastest growing religions in the world for about the last fifty years. There is sufficient public interest in it for it to be given due consideration on the basis of some other factor, and size and general public knowledge about the Faith are the only two factors remaining that I am aware of. As the Faith is growing faster than public knowledge can keep up with it it should not be considered solely from the point of view of the academic community, so the only impartial test for how much consideration it should be given compared to other religions would be its size, which is estimated at seven to ten million followers worldwide based on the most recent statistics and statements from the Baha'i World Center. Judaism has approximately fourteen million followers world-wide." +just what the fuck do you think you are doing, unblock 195.93.21.74. i have done shit all wrong and i need to ask a question at the reference desk, fucking slag. +Well, you still have to be careful not to ask for the non-existant. Do you have a significant number of sources that say they are commonly called something else? There's not generally a requirement that you provide lots of sources to prove something. Yes, WP:UNDUE comes into play, but we need some reason to believe that said name is UNDUE. +Do us a favour There are many admins currently looking at blocking you. It can possibly be avoided if you moderate your language and refrain from edit warring. Thanks zzuuzz (talk) +" Looking at your recent edits, it appears you have been adding sources to the article. That's fine, and your additions won't be deleted. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Talk to me " +Bingo. Now fuck off and take your stinks with you (hopefully). +Orel Hershiser's scoreless innings streak You were among the discussants at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Orel Hershiser's scoreless inning streak/archive1 in January. There has been a WP:PR and I hope that you would re-evaluate the the current nomination. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) +" Fine. Maybe I will. And who the heck are all of those ""sock puppets?"" Triple M " +Sorry, I'm colour-blind. I see nothing. Currently I am eating warthog steak. Would you like to join me? +April 2006 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. +" Indeed they are. As a political science instructor, teaching classes at both a State college and a Christian college, I am amazed at the amount of pseudoscience that passes itself off as ""truth"" in the social sciences and I'm talking about notable textbooks used in classrooms, not just obvious examples like Bowling for Columbine and Sicko. Talk " +March 2014 (UTC) How about if we stop re-hashing history and get to today. The material you edit warred over has been proven. It is no longer in dispute. Can you give any valid reason why it should not be put back into the article? I'm not asking about your opinions about me, something that happened weeks ago or any other nonsense you want to use to derail the issue. Why should this material be kept out? 14:14, 5 +huh Jr called it him all the time I assumed it was a nicknam...*coughassumegoodfaithcough*188.222.227.22 +For all the points you have tried to make about numbers, you have failed to address the point I made at the beginning, that is the list is nothing more than a yellow pages style and is of no value. Can you explain of what value it is and why it should not be left up to DLAP's own website (which is linked to) to have that list. Why not put a link in the External Links section to the page on the DLAP website ? +hey So whats the problem with me creating a tech4aday page...its a real company... +REDIRECT Talk:Joint warfare in South Vietnam, 1963–69 +Purposeful misinformation on the Orban page Hi - I noticed by chance that earlier this month a user from Malaysia decided to use a modified version of the script of the Fetih 1453 movie to alter the text of the Orban article. He continued with some minor changes and someone else just did another grammar change. The modifications are both unsubstantiated and ridiculous (both in terms of the language used and the obvious ideological angle). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orban&diff;=629385234&oldid;=621348395 I would fix it myself but I have no time to keep up with what I expect will become an edit war on WP (plus have had in the past enough experience with Fut.Perf. and his gang that I've got little interest in getting involved with that crowd again once higher powers -) get involved in the resulting edit war). I am hoping you can help since I am already seeing people outside of WP cite the article (which is how I noticed it). Thanks, Constantinos +dragon rape your 80 pound nerdy ass while I get drunk and jerk off. Fucking loser. +PKtm, I am sorry that you feel this way but you reading too much into this. I am not attemtping an edit war against you, I am merely attempting to find an amicable solution on both parts. I cannot see a suspect reason for the creation of this article, no matter how many ways I look at it. I merely took action in a way that I felt befitted the situation. You must, of course, take note that I did this for both sides. This way, you get to keep Danielle on the list of secondary characters whilst we get her own seperate article. As I have stated, I feel that this article contains enough information to warrant it's own article. Admittedly, she has not yet had a starring role but surely, since she has such a large amount of information about her, it would be best if the majority of that synoptic information was kept on a seperate page where people can read more about her. Please stop assuming that I am attempting to carry on an edit war when I am not. I am merely trying to solve this matter in a mature & civil manner - +Re Fauna of Puerto Rico Sorry. I am glad you have corrected my errors. +" The middle part from the source article, which was clipped from the Wikipedia article, is""My suspicion is that the majority of Muslims in the United States, who regard themselves as Muslims first and not as Americans really at all, see an American map one day where this is the United States of Islam, not the United States of America. I think it pays to harbor those suspicions."" Does that passage somehow exonerate Severin? Where did he say ""most""? His words are ""majority"" and ""vast majority"". Are you quibbling about the ""vast"" which appears in the previous quote but not in the above one? The phrase ""at all"" means ""in any way or respect"" - it is different than the ""all"" in ""all the king's men"". I can't follow your argument here. " +Can you let me know where you got your info from, as it needs to be properly referenced. Am in the process of getting hold of a copy of the City of Nedlands' Municipal Heritage Inventory, which I hope will contain more of the history of the building. +Thanks Thanks for unblocking me, but you should think about blocking User:Smsarmad before I'm very sure he's the one who vandalized the articles previously Special:Contributions/81.149.22.123 because when I corrected the errors, he reverted them back. +I am going to pee on you! +Andranikpasha, your nickname expalins who are you? YOu are an armenianorigin person. Andranik indeed has been one ot he heads of the bloody Armenian militia killing Turks, Kurds and Azeris, with his terrorist acts has been the reason for the reaction of Kurds, Turks and Azeris after they returned from the war in 5 fronts. So your response is absolutly biased, because of your nationality and firm belief in an event that never occured or occurded only for the Armenian church who uses this so called armenian genocide to mobilzie armenians and prevent their assimilation. As to the fact this is not the page for the other side, this shows how much you are anti-democratic and biased on this issue. This is against the Wikip3edia neturality principle as well. You give one side an opportunity to jsutify her action, but the other side only one general and useless sentence. I wouldn't be surprised if you are a pro-Pelosi person. Please, don't accuse others with stupidity and etc. I know quite a lot about American politics and how it is run. I completed my studies in US. This is for your education and information. If I don't see any more jsutified response I will go an and extent the Turkey section and also create the Criticism section. Raman, Massachusetts +important to do this because as you said even that kb source has moved location now. All you have to do in the sandbox now is resource the info you got from it throughout with citations with an inline cite web template as you'd do on any other article. It's +", 5 March 2009 (UTC) Then seek to renegotiate it, but politely. Be careful because your next edit might be your last here otherwise. andemu 23:36" +Hi Hi, I didn't disrupt the article. What I added was correct and you should assume a little bit of good faith and judgment. 24.146.224.106 +Note All below visible warnings are posted by a person who is obviously mentally challenged. Therefore, this talk page is of no use to me. Any discussion related to any of my edits will be honored only on the pages where it happens to be commited. +" but I make very good edits on articles and am very helpful ARKJEDI10 " +http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_M._Deutch&diff;=248928873&oldid;=248928748 was up for only a few seconds after the above discussion was up for 8 months without comment. Why are you watching this article so closely? Why didn't you comment on this Talk page first? What is your POV? Are you government funded to edit here? 68.103.31.116 +WP:CIT is the link to Wikipedia's cite template page. All the citation templates are there for {cite web}, {cite book}, {cite video} etc. Hope that helps. +" From Pantheon.org's article on him: ""Being the supreme ruler he upheld law, justice and morals, and this made him the spiritual leader of both gods and men.........He brought peace in place of violence and Hesiod (circa 700 BCE) describes Zeus as ""the lord of justice"". Zeus was also known as ""Kosmetas"" (orderer), ""Soter"" (savior), ""Polieos"" (overseer of the polis, city) and ""Eleutherios"" (guarantor of political freedoms)."" 24.180.173.157 " +Rewrite - Relation to modern climate issues I think this section has to be rewritten. Taken alone, a niave reader may take this section to mean that this issue creates significant and credible evidence against anthropogenic global warming. This is WP:UNDUE. I suggest rewording There are credible arguments both for and against such a hypothesis to While there have been acadmic arguments both for and against such a hypothesis, the debate has had little impact on the general scientific consensus for man-made gobal warming. Objections? +" The translation as such is fairly accurate, but there is problem with diffent contexts. Detain/Häktad has different meaning especillay from a legal point of view, but I think that is understable and can be accepted. That the word Rape has different meaning is harder to pass by without clarifying. I have worked much with the article om sv:wp om rape, and know that English and US law defines this very differently from Swedish law and it is possible some mentioning of this would be necessary to make it understable for a person not from the Nordic countries. Also I think, but am not cetrain, that the actual charges are made in a more general wordings, more making references to several legal clauses. And that, if the interogation goes to a legal case, the actual wording of the charge then would be more specific, as one of the aim of the ""prestudy"" is for the prosecuter to be more certain of what legal cluses to persue. So in some ways to includee this into the article would clarify some parts, but in orher ways it could cause even more confusion (but on a higher level..). To make it properly understandable I beleive a little more then the bare translation is needeed, but would not this be too long then? " +Poker edits I noticed your edits to various poker players. A few weeks ago I started writing about 40-50 new articles on poker players. Since establishing them I've started to go back and add more information as I do more in depth research. You may be interested in 00:06, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC) +You are adding far too much trivia on show pages that has nothing to do with the show at hand. I know you love showing off your game show knowledge, but cluttering wikipedia is not the place for it. Perhaps you should make your own website? +" You think just because you are an admin you can just like that block me. Who you think you are. Accusing me of vandalism when i'm the one who made all this. Accusing me of dubious unsourced content when everything has references. Accusing me of unnecessary external links. Is this a Wikipedia or Yourpedia, for removing images so people wouldn't see them. There are many other such ""wikipedians"" among the lawmakers throughout the world. That's why we live in a prison. You have the arogancy to come from nowhere and start ""edit"" something that you haven't made, you haven't checked, just because someone like you made you an admin. And than, the hero moves to another one. Who the hell you think you are, little boy. ""Editors"" and ""anti-vandalism"" heros like you roam around only in search of the next ""expert-tag"" on their page. They do not create. They play for score, in the meantime thay may do something creative. One like you apologized to me just for the same type of ""excellent"" job. I bet you live for this, isn't it, little boy. This is your food. Without it you're dead. You're nobody. ""...not very useful to our readers..."" You, arrogant child, are useless to the Wikipedia readers. You are that someone who brakes the essence of Wikipedia - ""the free enciclopedia"". ""Please stop. And please stop attacking other editors or you will be blocked from editing"". Please this, please that would not hide the abomination. ""...please stop attacking other editors..."" It's really interesting, this is what the guilty always say, protecting themselves from what they know would come, if they don't make the first move. ""Attack is the best defence"", was that one of the credos of the pseudo-intellectuals. Immatures like you are so disgustingly simple. You are nobody. You can't block someone just because they gave you the ""keys to the house"". If other, uncorrupted by you, admin takes my side, you'll give a little fight and than you'll stand down like a puppy. You see now who, or should i say what you are, hero. You are nobody. You're not even a real employee of the Wikipedia. You're just one of the thousands underaged, in therms of mind or even age, wannabes. You're a joke. Your god Jimmy Wales use you as a tissue, while making his money. You're a joke even to him. If you only knew how many people like me notice this but stay quiet, just because they want to be part of the herd. How about that. It looks like you're a joke not just for people like me, a. Very sad picture, a little boy trying to feel he counts for something. Grab a cigar, you might just start looking like adult. Enjoy your ""power"" from behind the screen, and pray we never meet." +The runic from Tiawanaku were 56 , kind of symbolic systems the same 12 from 24 in Celtic druid, bards and magicians were made in Norway , Iceland, Finland, Denmark , how to understand for more than 10 000 years the symbolic language were used and today we continuous making new ideas and graphics or idographics for any publicity communications and politics. +" Saved it! '''' Michael Q.'' " +You blocked me. Great. Now how about blocking User:Taiwan boi, who started another edit war after an administrator said not to, and tagged the page as being under construction so I could do my edits without harassment from this character, against the explicit instructions in the tag box. It's rather like the NFL: You threw the yellow flag based on what you saw after the fact because you didn't see what happened before the fact. Ike +Which ones? Most are here , many, like shyster, are also well documented elsewhere. 21:01, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) +" Video Mention Until today this article had a sentence about a ""proposed video"" to feature Avril Lavigne as a vampire and Michael Jackson rising from the dead. I suspect that this is a hoax so I removed the sentence. If anyone wants to put it back, make sure you have a reliable source. (Talk|Contribs) " +Thank you! Dear Mr Beestra. Thank you for blocking me. I need to get a life. As you can see, my steps toward semi-retirement have been spectacularly unsuccessful. You have provided me with a scenario where I am no longer encumbered by my addiction to wikipedia. I am in your debt. +But based on the wikipedia articles for cyborg and android, it appears to be both. talk +You are a fucking Nazi... Everything I wrote on my page was well written and factual. You are obviously a racist Nazi Jew. +":And? 1. We were talking about Pudding here. 2. Mentioning Ichigo as 13 right away in the anime could just be a continuity error - or remember what I said about Sailor Moon. 3. I guess if Ichigo's age was changed, somebody (e.g. Mia Ikumi) would've at least commented on this. 4. No Japanese sources that I know indicate that Ichigo's age was changed. 5. Regardless, you're going to have to deal with when she comes here, and she'll most certainly be rude to you. Yume no Kishi - Talk " +i have the source But i will ask you to put it in for me ok? http://www.joshuaproject.net/peopctry.php?rop3=103691&rog3;=JM theres your proof. this was also emailed to me. ) +No, you're wrong. Further spreading of Russian is viewed in UA as the main threat to Ukrainian. This is the main reason why it was not allowed to become a state language yet despite the survey shows that the slight majority favors it. The issue is very related. +call Leave Sandove89 alone. +" Powhatan-Toney This statement is curious: ""The Toney-Powhatan Tribe sacred burial ground circa 1800, is located on property developed by the Powhatan-Toney family within the Redstone Arsenal boundary."" Is it a tribe or a family? Is it ""Toney-Powhaten"" or ""Powhaten-Toney""? The same user also wrote the Powhatan-Toney article, titling it Powhaten Tribe. After discussion there's been a move and name change, but I'm wondering about notability here. - ♫♦♫ " +" At the end of the day, it's all arbitrary. The Earth rotates about an axis. One end is called ""north"", the other ""south"". " +Okay, thank you, you just clearly violated the civility rule by calling me stupid, that's just a bonus. +Rockpocket did you get the mail i sent. there seems to be more vandalism by an anon ip user can u block them? +" This is a pointless argument. Nobody ever makes the choice between progressive and interlaced video at the same line count and refresh rate, because they are applicable to different situations. You might as well say that ""12 bits-per-pixel images reduce the bandwidth to half of 24 bits-per-pixel, for a given resolution"". This may be true, but it's not likely to be useful, because the 12bpp image simply has half of the 24bpp images's information removed, and so is appropriate for a different set of purposes. – \talk " +Photo Shalom! I have added a photo I took of Jimmy Kessler to the B'nai Israel article and his own biographical article. I thought I let you know, in the event you can think of other articles in which its addition might also be appropriate or useful. +" Good luck. You're doing exactly the same things as me except I did German as well. You'll do fine! [[User talk:OllieFury|Fury]] Contribs " +"It is not ""his article"" either. Thanks for your condescending attitude by the way. Your GED had gotten you far in life. " +" Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mileyworld.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Mileyworld.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ""fair use"" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg " +":""best known for"" is in all cases, without exception, a subjective statement which cannot possibly be verified. In the example you give, you'd want to put something objective like ""...their greatest commercial success came with 'TITLE', which reached blah blah blah."" But no-one's tried to enforce any standards for years and years and years, and have instead rewarded idiots who have never created any content with power. So there are very few editors who can even tell the difference between subjective and objective these days. Seems like you might be one of them.201.215.187.159 " +If you want to add this to the article (as your recent edits suggest) then you need to find a reliable source stating what happens in this case. Without sources, material such as this becomes original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. — +what was james wolfe mothers name? +For example, the biased Wikipedia article says that paleomagnetic data shows the Earth has maintained a constant size. However any paleomagnetic data which would suggest otherwise is removed. Furthermore, the article suggest tidal rythimite data is infallible, however any scientific papers questioning the reliability of tidal rhythmite data is removed and vandalized. +I thought this might come up. You're thinking of the temperature in the shade, which is how temperatures are usually measured. In this case it was the temperature in direct sunlight - there is no shade in the desert - which is obviously going to be considerably hotter. +Thank you. What are the policies around cleaning up the talk from last night? I'd prefer to have that be a thing of the past now that we are both taking a fresh start. +"::::It must of been a really good show. It airs in Australia at 10pm on Saturday nights. It's friday afternoon in Australia, so I'll watch it tomorrow night. ''' [[User talk:Save Us.Y2J|Us.]]Y2J''' 18:01, September 4 2009 (UTC) " +"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Fire Station No. 23/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Lead Built in 1910, it was also the Los Angeles Fire Department's headquarters until 1920 and the residence of every fire chief from 1910-1928. - this can be reworded: in it's current state it does not flow, maybe Built in 1910 as the Los Angeles Fire Department's headquarters until 1920, and serving as the residence for the department's fire chiefs - or something like that.When it opened, it spawned a political firestorm due to the ornate interior and expensive imported materials used in its construction. It has been called the ""Taj Mahal"" of firehouses. - these can be made into one sentence somehow, as they are closely connected. I feel the lead should give a brief/short reason why the station was close and what is the current state. Controversy over the station's cost and extravaganceonly 26 feet (7.9 m) wide but 167 feet (51 m) long. - long? is this talking about length in height or what?The main floor was an arcade stretching from Fifth to Winston Streets with stalls for ten horses, repressed vitrified brick, walls of white enamel tiling, and pressed steel ceilings 21 feet (6.4 m) above the floor.'' Other There is no explanation as in why it closed. That is one main reason that needs to be elaborated. I feel the sections could be named and organized differently, like so? ==History== ===Construction controversy=== ===Operation=== ==Museum== ===Controversy of restoration=== I recommend rewording ""shooting"" into ""filming"" location, as that sounds as if a shooting occurred there. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Is it reasonably well written? A. Prose quality: B. MoS compliance: Is it factually accurate and verifiable? A. References to sources: B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: C. No original research: Is it broad in its coverage? A. Major aspects: B. Focused: Is it neutral? Fair representation without bias: Is it stable? No edit wars, etc: Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Overall: Pass or Fail: " +Apology Hello, 81! I just want to say I'm sorry for reverting your edits on Bleed Like Me and I understand that maybe you don't like having your edits reverted anyway. | talk +" Reply Hi there, since you do not wish to have a united article representing all point of views and would like to stick to your point of view, I have no rights to prevent you other than that of a fellow wikipedian from South Asia. I have divided both the pages under discussion into two parts. One for Government point of view and one for refugee point of view. Since there is no neutral or united point of view, I will not be editing or discussing in those pages as actively as I have been doing. Besides, I can not prepare for my exams with no other than my fellow South Asian accusing me of fancy accusitions in place no other than wikipedia. Here is something that I have to say as regards your recent posts in this page: About: Eukesh, you say all the right things, that we need a neutral article, that you want to be constructive, but at the end of it, it seems your mind is closed. You say you have not read the garbage from the nepalese press but that you have done a lot of research on the internet. isn't that where all that garbage is available? you say you want to be constructive but you are already fixed in your view that all the ethnic nepalese people in the camps are from bhutan. FYI, if they’re not from Nepal, it could be they are from india also, ie, not necessarily from Bhutan. being 'stateless' is not such a big thing in this region for which someone HAS to be blamed. you can count the number of poor nepalese without any documents who are finding their way to india every day. if ever there was a census to be done between nepal and india, you will find millions ‘stateless’ by your definition, definitely in the hundreds of thousands. is bhutan responsible for that? is it inconceivable to you that some of them might have made their way to bhutan? You conclude that it is 'entirely a Bhutanese issue' and nothing could be further from the truth. If nepal wasn't quite the economic basketcase it has become, maybe the rest of us in the region wouldn't have to deal with such an outflow of emigrants from your country. About: ""You say you have not read the garbage from the nepalese press but that you have done a lot of research on the internet."" Please do not comment about Nepalese press in a nation where it has played a major part in bringing a revolution from a nation where there is virtually no press. The press here is not garbage. However, I did not care about the Bhutanese refugee case until I found that it was missing here and thought of writing about it. About: ""You say you have not read the garbage from the nepalese press but that you have done a lot of research on the internet. isn't that where all that garbage is available?"" Wikipedia is available in net. Do you call it garbage? I have cited the information from sites of globally accepted bodies and not from the sites hosted by some pro- or anti- groups or some blog pages About: you say you want to be constructive but you are already fixed in your view that all the ethnic nepalese people in the camps are from bhutan. FYI, if they’re not from Nepal, it could be they are from india also, ie, not necessarily from Bhutan. being 'stateless' is not such a big thing in this region for which someone HAS to be blamed. I do not have a point of view. I agree that I have made some points which were offensive to some, but it was not intentional and were derived from the data. There was a speculation which was corrected later. I just posted what were there in websites of UNHCR and other global organizations which is something that is done in wikipedia. I have told you that people of Nepalese origin are found throughout the world. Many might be stateless. However, the reports of UNHCR shows otherwise in case of Bhutanese refugees. If you can change their view, please do. Otherwise stop editing with whatever you wish to write or in your own words, stop garbaging wikipedia. About ""being 'stateless' is not such a big thing in this region for which someone HAS to be blamed."" Well, there is nothing which can top this sort of irresponsible comment. you can count the number of poor nepalese without any documents who are finding their way to india every day. if ever there was a census to be done between nepal and india, you will find millions ‘stateless’ by your definition, definitely in the hundreds of thousands. is bhutan responsible for that? is it inconceivable to you that some of them might have made their way to bhutan? You conclude that it is 'entirely a Bhutanese issue' and nothing could be further from the truth. If nepal wasn't quite the economic basketcase it has become, maybe the rest of us in the region wouldn't have to deal with such an outflow of emigrants from your country. +I never get tired of that one bro. Vandalism continues. Enviroboy,Lights, JetLover, Creol, Werdan7, Cobi, delldot, Vector The wiki blacklist +PS Ideally an article in WP should have at least 2 sources, but sometimes it takes a while to achieve that! +Sam Berns interesting edits, call me when you get a youtube video with over 8.882.667 hits cheers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36m1o-tM05g +" It seems that you dont understand nothing or worse, that you dont want to understand nothing... I translate the first paragraph to English with some Google Translate help: ""At the urging of activists sympathetic to the cause of Western Sahara, one of the last territories to be decolonized in the planet, and the office in Madrid of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, we've been commissioned late last year to develop and unify the graphical representation of the principal symbol of the whole nation: its flag. Some raids had already been done by us in the field of graphic-design-and vexillology in heraldry."" If you still dont understand it, Ill tell you more clearly: it was the SADR office in Madrid who contacted that Spanish studio to order them that work, and not viceversa. If that is not enough to see that that work is a SADR officially sanctioned work, I really dont know what should be needed to show that... " +" Robert Conrad Frank, I've reversed your deletion in the Robert Conrad entry for his friendship with mafia hitman/murderer Tony Spilotro. You deleted because it was ""uncited"". All you had to do was go to Google and Google "" 'Robert Conrad' 'Spilotro' "" and it is the very first entry - in an interview he gave. It's quite well known. You didn't even bother to do even a minimum of research. I notice this a lot in Wikipedia - people deleting things they know nothing about, on subjects they know nothing about, and not bothering to do any research. For the record, I don't delete or even modify anything if I do not know the subject matter quite well. I don't know why you edited this out - you obviously know very little about Robert Conrad. Anyway, I've put it back in, with the very first link I found, which was the very first entry that comes up on Google when you put in both their names. Duh." +Commons does not follow our naming conventions, but I see nothing which refutes the article I've made on either of those pages anyway. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk +" No real contributions? I point out the fact that objective scientists and real-world experience make a mockery of your sexist views of female sexuality. I point out that your sexist ""puttering around in a Yugo"" nonsense is refuted by my own real-world experience. I point out that the sex change industry THRIVES upon your sort of ridiculous sexist stereotypes. Not only do lots of people take my comments seriously, I'm on the phone now with a colleague who agrees wholeheartedly with my views. In fact, she's seriously considering posting some thoughts here. I've read/heard these very same opinions from many, many people. But go ahead, keep telling yourself that I'm the only who sees through your sexist nonsense. " +" I dont know how accurate this source quoted in the article is: ""According to Atmane Tazaghart and Roland Jacquard, in the French Figaro magazine, it was founded by Abu Abdallah Hassan Ben Mahmoud on the 29th of September 2003"" I haven't been able to confirm this with any source on the internet. The only information I have found about Ben Mahmoud is that he is a field commander with al Qaeda in Iraq. I know the Washington post interviewed the current leader Ishmael Jubouri in Late November of 2004 . Try to solve this factual dispute quickly it's already been quoted by many others. " +Tila Tequila Oh OK thanks! +Controversies Surely the passing of confidential documents to her by her sister should count as a controversy? Currently under the family section. +" I though I should post this here before sending it out to info@thefinancialdaily.com, info@manhattandatainc.com and others; Attention: To the owner/registrant of ""The Financial Daily International"" (DATANET) and the website provider Network Solutions, LLC. This is a notice Copyright Infringement. ""The Financial Daily International"", is in violations of U.S. and international copyright agreements. The webpage titled ""Technology behind water-fuelled vehicles By: Syed Abul Abbas Naqvi - Articles Detail"" (http://thefinancialdaily.com/Articles/ViewArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=2810) violates the terms and agreements set out for the use of Wikipedia content. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights) The editors of the Wikipedia article ""Water Fuelled Car"" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled_car) which use the alias SteveBaker (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SteveBaker), CyclePat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CyclePat) and Presby (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Presby), are in the view that their written materials have been illegally republished by the Financial Daily's website. Their decision may be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Water-fuelled_car/Archive_1#Does_this_look_familiar_to_anyone.3F The editors are legally entitled to seek compensatory damages. Expect to hear from their lawyers. This violation must be immediately corrected to conform to the terms of agreement stipulated in the use of Wikipedia's GFDL material and international copyright laws to prevent any further legal actions. You may rectify this problem by either removing the content or ""in the second case, if you incorporate external GFDL materials, as a requirement of the GFDL, you need to acknowledge the authorship and provide a link back to the network location of the original copy."" Take note that on August 1st 2008, editor, SteveBaker advised you of this infringement. A copy of this message is being sent to the ""current internet website registrar"" via their online feedback form located at url http://bpmforms.networksolutions.com/customer-feedback.html. According to WHOIS search results, (http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=thefinancialdaily.com) The Financial Daily's Website registrar is Network Solutions, LLC 13861 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 300 HERNDON, VA 20171, US The server is also listed as Worldnic.com (which redirects to the afformentioned Network Solutions, LCC's website). The server's IP 216.25.127.86 is hosted in the UNITED STATES-GEORGIA-ATLANTA.(http://whois.domaintools.com/thefinancialdaily.com) and subject to United States law. WHOIS records shows that Datanet is the registrant of the Financial Daily's"" website. (http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=thefinancialdaily.com) According to the Financial Daily's website, the company is located in Pakistan. Here is a satellite image of the business' address http://wikimapia.org/#lat=24.829605&lon;=67.073875&z;=18&l;=0&m;=a&v;=2&show;=/2271833/DataNet_Pvt._Ltd. However there is a MDI Datanet in the United States. A copy of this notice has been sent to the registrant MDI Datanet (info@manhattandatainc.com). (http://www.manhattandatainc.com/communication/contact.asp). Another copy has been sent to the author of the infringing material, via Mr Syed Abul Abbas Naqvi's facebook entry.(http://es.facebook.com/people/Syed_Abul_Abbas_Naqvi/1306816030) Discussion/comments DoneBetter to include the official copyright page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights instead of a redirect to it? OTOH, you could use one of the prewritten form letters for this situation (although the personal touch is always nice:). Hmmm... maybe is 3 days after the first notice a little bit short to shut a part of the internet off. Apparently the only contact with the web site was a ""rude email"" sent sometime on Friday. It's now only Monday. Have the esteemed editors here considered going the route of 'polite request and education' rather than 'over-the-top ridiculous legal threat'? I've made more detailed remarks in the concurrent thread at AN/I. (talk) Woaahh there! The suggestion above is WAY over the top. We don't have to invent a way to do this - +There are a couple variants of this layout-style, which I guess can be called option#G_double_barrel, and my original idea which is option#G_all_on_the_right. The main advantage of option#G, either flavor, is compactness. You don't need captions on the photos, although hover-click would be a nice bonus; I didn't try to implement that though. You also don't need a separate gallery, which saves space. And, although the textual-info is relatively compact, and the pics are lined up with the textual-info, you don't need to have vertical column orientation (like option#C) and you don't need to have excess whitespace (like option#D and like the dem-list or the potus-list). I'm not sure I actually *like* option#G, either variant, but it is a viable option methinks, and may satisfy some folks who desire easy-to-correlate pics but are against excess whitespace. 75.108.94.227 +. i mean why i usedto Think you are Gay. ok well goodbye.}} +Ok then I have a objective for us today with a reason On this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortality I am talking about the undesirability of immortality. Objective: Being either delete it all & add the truth OR only add the truth. If you must, then find references supporting the truth answer. Reason: 1)You would not be in hell with hellish torment of your 5 senses. 2) You would not be in a built heaven with bored senses such as seeing vision and hearing and feeling being boring, you would have great feeling and tasting and seeing of vision and hearing of long-quality incredible techno power music and palaces and a girl and best quality never ending games and best food such as fries and would always be great senses and so CANNOT be bad boring senses, great senses forever, they stay great cause that's what a consciousness can keep getting is great senses, and the things of the most attractive girl and best games and keep eating food are so incredible it goes further the greatness of high quality senses or great fun forever! 3) Even though totally unneccesary, you can erase memory anyhow and have great senses forever. 4) The greatest things for our senses arrrrre-the meaning, it says: the meaning doesn't grow and grow and that it doesn't grow with living forever and infact de-grows, wrong, there isn't such thing! you have great senses of eating fries as much as want over and over and still are awesome senses and the best never ending games to see how far can get & your most attractive partner you see and see as object-of-vision and the most most attractive face for you of vision and 5 great senses together that will be incredible you get forever, it's funner! +IS AN OBESE HORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Removal of USD fare display Do users think it is a good idea to display fares in US Dollars? Three problems with this 1. The seats are always sold in INR with exchange rate of the day applicable. 2. This sale is applicable to foreign tourists or if the sale has been concluded by travel agents outside India. 3. How does one cope with the daily fluctuations to the currency market? I propose removal of the fare chart entirely or atleast the fare in US Dollars. +People like you are the problem, Brangifer. You are more focused on censoring information than on building articles. You THINK that you are fighting bias in the articles, but you don't recognize your own bias. You don't value information, which is ironic since this is an encyclopedia. You and Verbal and the other so-called skeptics are ruining Wikipedia. +You can just take this [] for example.He does not want others to Know that Wahabis is just about spreading terrorism nothing else nothing less.He always removed verifiable content. +Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area. If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun! Good luck! (talk) +|User talk:Eladkse|period=July 2012 to February 2013 +Simply practicing the Jewish religion does not make a person Jewish. You have to be ethnically Jewish in order to be Jewish. Converts to Judaism are not real Jews because they are ethnically something different. Case in point: Black Hebrew Israelites. Chinese and Indian Jews are real Jews because although they have Chinese and Indian descent, they also have Judean descent. +Old Icelandic is a perfectly acceptable term for the language in Iceland in the middle ages, just as Old Norwegian is in use about the language in Norway. But is has never been common usage to refer to the old Norwegian language as old Icelandic. +Algora Publishing does not seem onits own to meet WP:RS if one reads their manuscript submission rules etc.. It is per Poor contract. Not recommended. A publisher. Better sources should be found. +" Emerging superpower Emerging superpower articles are up for deletion. — [TALK] [C] " +User:Giano Please, could either your or ArbCom tell the entire community why we must all continue to tolerate User:Giano who has been banned a staggering 45 or more times and yet is always released from his bans? This might require a pretty good explanation. See his latest appalling and vicious attack of editorial vandalism on the current UK Baron Sudeley, which I have just reverted. +Ramdasia (Weavers) Links Following are the live matrimonial links from various websites which proves that Ramdasia is a caste of weavers. http://www.gurmatparkash.com/?title=RAMDASIA_SIKHS http://www.askht.com/suiteable-match-for-ramdasia-sikh-weaver-girl-29-5-1-iid-37955431 http://ramdasiashadi.myehunt.com/?tag=ramdasia-sikh-boy http://www.ramdasiashadi.com/?page_id=2 http://www.shaadi.com/partner_search/matrimonial_search/profile.php?profileid=jaswinderMBA_2509&set;=85d9db0dfbf61c0cabce7d190a053c18 (subcaste:weaver) http://profile.hindimatrimony.com/profiledetail/viewprofile.php?id=H1600822 (subcaste:weaver) http://classified.aapkancr.com/index.php?a=2&b;=38213 http://www.tripatlas.com/Ramdasia http://profile.punjabimatrimony.com/profiledetail/viewprofile.php?id=P730502 [preferable match from Ramdasia (Weaver) cast ] http://www.olx.in/suitable-match-for-delhi-based-ramdasia-sikh-weaver-iid-18397107 +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  afist " +Well then thanks for your info. Take whatever decision you want, however that'll be fairly enaugh to help me IMPROVE my article and not to delete it. It does not represent any threat or offense to anyone. It is pure information deemed to help. Cheers! +Having fun? Another of your racist admins just deleted my response again and u keep lying about me. +"Your article on History of the Jews in Croatia looks like original research, something Wikipedia does not tolerate—hence the tag on top of it. Please provide sources for your information, otherwise it will get deleted. Thank you. Slgr@ndson ( - messages - contribs) " +, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Perhaps because, as far as I know, complying with COinS metadata isn't a part of WP:MOS. 19:55 +Long overdue Not to self...this was obvious...too bad it took so long to get done. +" December 2009 (UTC) Kohoutec: So far, here's what I've found: Here it's listed on Dutch Charts: It's All Over Now Baby Blue but with the 1973 sleeve. This link: Them Again shows ""Baby Blue"" as one of the songs for the recording session for Them Again. Here's also a mention in J Rogan's book that the arrangement was actually worked out separately before the session for Them Again: ""Like everyone else on the pop scene in late 1965, [Tommy] Scott readily acknowledged the importance of Bob Dylan and was eager for Morrison to cover ""It's All Over Now, Baby Blue"". After several hours work on the Dylan track at Regent Sound, pianist Phil Coulter went home and Scott called a break. 'The number wasn't going down', Scott remembers. 'Van wasn't sure. Then the guys said he didn't fancy it and thought it was cheap because I'd tried to go after the 'Here Comes The Night' tempo.' Scott reconsidered and after picking up a blues riff, a new arrangement emerged, apparently with added piano work from Peter Bardens. Engineer Bill Farley modulated the sound and Morrison provided one of his most expressive vocals."" pp. 137-138 Rogan, Van Morrison: No Surrender. It then goes on to say ......""After the preliminaries at Regent Sound, Them were booked into Decca's studios to record their next album. (which was Them Again - my notation) I'll continue looking but info is sparse on the single release for this. 18:13, 6" +" Thank you for confirming that you cannot ban me. In my honest opinion you are someone who should not be on Wikipedia. You are not very intelligent - for sure. You know it is impossible to ban anyone forever from Wikipedia, but you still carry on pretending that you can. You get a cheap thrill every time you do it. Enjoy yourself. You ban someone simply because you can - like Bill Clinton said he had oral sex with Monica Lewinsky ""because he could"". Because you disagree with someone stating the truth that is also noteworthy and very verifiable, is not a valid reason for you to have another cheap thrill by pretending you are banning that person for life. However, that is what you do because you do not have the ability to find something more financially rewarding to do. You are happy to sit and waste your time because you are not capable to find something actually paying some money to do. So, come and have another cheap thrill and pretend you can again ban me for life. " +" Numbers 1.000 Serbs killed by terrorist albanians? Is someone kidding to me? NATO, USA, Clinton claimed Serbs killed 500 000 albanians (in truth they killed thousands of terrorists in self defense actions in Serbian Kosovo) and that albanians killed 1.000 Serbs. Terrorist so called ""KLA"" killed both albanians (they considered that are cooperating with Serbs) and Serbs. Today many of murders on albanians commited by terrorist ""KLA"" are attributed to Serbs. Anyway, it's on you who are you going to believe, USA that said 500 000 albanians were killed for 3 years, while only 1.000 Serbs were killed, or Serbs who claimed 10.000 Serbs were killed. If they would lie, they would say 100.000 Serbs were killed or something like that. I believe we should change number of killed Serbs to at least 4.000 to 10.000, if you don't agree with me tell me why and let's discuss it. And yeah if someone doesn't delete albanian lies from this articles I will send pictures of Serbian baby Sava burned allive near prizren in 1999, Serbian baby slaughtered near Gnjilane, burned churches etc. and then ask youreslves who was ethnic cleansing who. Anyone who has at least little brain could see demographic cards from those years and you can clearly see that every year Clinton and NATO (USA) claimed that Serbs killed 500.000 albanians, more and more Serbs were killed, so less and less Serbs were those years in this Serbian province. " +" What is an ANI??? If it's another terrible no-talent Western rock group like Coldplay, moaning in the singing voices of castrated schoolboys about ""Jello,"" then please spare me the introduction. I know great music, great Soviet music of beautiful voice women and deep voice strong men, and Coldplay is incapable of creating any faximile of it. " +" Hello, I didn't mean to put a personal attack on Wingard. I apologize and it won't happen again. Talk? " +I have backed them up all over the place. I really don't feel the need to every time I post. The Lennon connection needs to be removed, as it is questionable, and questionable material needs to be removed from BLP's immediately. YOU might not think it is questionable, but it is clear based on the responses from users that it is. +Wikipedia book hoax]] Wikipedia talk:Reusing Wikipedia content +" So what degrees do you hold now? Had to delete that question didn't you? To quote Star Wars, ""Your lack of faith disturbs me."" I'm talking about your faith in science. You've proven your case, if your case is that loudest argument wins out. I've made my case I won't touch your precious error-ridden article nor your discussion board any more. You have a good day and continue to be as bliss as ignorance is." +" The link is correct. The expression ""Buckwheat"" is a highly offensive racial slur against African-Amercians. " +" Socrates Leal A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Socrates Leal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. (//c) " +I could use a cupcake. +Explanation Can you tell me why you chose to ignore the point made by WaltCip in this incident? And having looked around at how others reported at ANI are treated for similar episodes, is there any reason why I shouldn't think that your treatment of my case was out of the ordinary, and seemingly designed simply to lock me up and throw away the key, on the basis that it was likely nobody would notice/care beyond that sort of single comment at ANI, and that rather than persisting with the ponderous and mentally abusive unblock process that you put me in, that I would probably just take Jehochman's advice anyway if I ever wanted to return. +Hello. Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. If you would like to help Wikipedia, please contribute to pages that need more information, or put in the template for speedy deletion. If there are pages that are nonsense and do not need to be on Wikipedia, please don't blank the pages, as you did to After Class Lesson. It may be considered vandalism. Thank you for trying to help. +There's an ongoing discussion about this at WT:FAC, and you can request any of the 22 reviews to be emailed to you if you want to see them. Fatuorum +" Speedy deletion of Will berardelli A tag has been placed on Will berardelli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +" DYK nom Did you know? was updated. On 6 December, 2007, from the article Patrick Mills, which you recently nominated, featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. " +" Shouldn't we balance this section out with some people who don't care or think the Monkees were an abomination?Like this: Fred Cocklskew of Frampington said ""Who gives a s***?"". like that I think that would be good, yeahhh?" +Dumbhead YOU ARE A DUMBHEAD, YOU SILLY FREAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Well, this is wikipedia after all... nothing is set in stone. +"::Well, , it's not a hoax exactly, but it's a prime example of what happens when you start out with a hypothesis and a ""worthy cause"" and then try to find any and all evidence that supports it (no matter how far-fetched or in the case of the current draft blatantly wrong), instead of the other way 'round. The problem is, while there are examples of androcentricity in language (although its effect on cognitive and social processes is debatable), the examples she cites are not, and she makes the rather fatal mistake of conflating grammatical gender with ""natural"" gender and the diachronic with the synchronic analysis of language. She also seems to accept an extreme version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis completely uncritically, although the hypothesis is never even mentioned explicitly in the draft. It's pretty clear the author has not had any formal training in linguistics (or in the languages she has attempted to analyze), and appears not to have consulted the rather vast body of academic literature on androcentric language. Or perhaps she had, but decided ignore the inconvenient conclusions? In any case, it's fairly obvious why the original version of the book was not published by an academic press, and why the revised second version is self-published. " +AfD nomination Hi Derwig, Both Magen Lacholeh articles have been rewritten and augmented by ample secondary sources. Could you pls review and withdraw your AfD nomination? Thanks +" Objection: You appear to ignore the following facts: 1. I was responding to a post by AndyTheGrump at Talk: Communist terrorism, section ""Marxism is not the only 'communism'"", where he called me ""idiot"" and then refused to retract his remark when I requested him to do so. 2. Far from ""reasserting material I was blocked for previously"", I very clearly stated ""I removed all remarks that could have been construed as ""offensive"""". Indeed I had long refactored the remarks that had been in dispute on the ANI page. 3. I was attacked by Bishonen for stating that according to a statement by Dianaa the block had been lifted unconditionally. " +I agree with you cjllw. +Ambar - deleted and then restored Not sure if this has been pointed out, but it looks like AfD screwed up. Just to start the ball rolling and institute a culture change, I'm trying to get all admins closing things at AfD to remember to check the page history of an article before deleting, so that drastic changes in the nature of a page are spotted, and also urging those voting at AfD to do the same. See the following for details: Ambar Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ambar article log for Ambar Copied to closing admin, restoring admin, deletion nominator, all who voted in the AfD discussion, and the AfD talk page. +" ""Publications Analyst"" could mean anything. It could mean his job was to look for spelling errors and to make sure the pages weren't printed upside-down. " +"===Dispute resolution=== ''s cartoon of former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon as a monster eating Palestinian babies (a pastiche of Francisco de Goya's 1819 Saturn Devouring His Son), which was awarded the cartoon of the year for 2003. The cartoon drew criticism for its alleged use of classical European anti-Semitic libels under the pretext of criticizing Israel. Others, regarded it as legitimate political criticism.The Independent's Press Complaints Commission (PCC), in response to complaints of anti-Semitism, found that paper had not breached its code of practice in publishing the cartoon. Gerald Kaufman, ""No"" (opinion piece), The Independent, 31 January 2003.'""Sharon eating babies"" cartoon wins British prize' by Ellis Shuman (IsraelInsider.com)PCC: The IndependentPublished by The Independent on January 27, Britain's Holocaust Memorial Day]] Please edit the version to the right, rather than the one on the article page. Furthermore, please explain with what changes you agree/disagree and, more importantly, why'' you agree/disagree with those changes. ← " +I did create a new account. But when I created a new article, it was somehow deleted and I don't knwo why. And, why do you not want me to create an article of my own? Is it because you feel threatened by the accuracy in the info that you feel that you have to lash out like a little girl by dleting my info? Why don't you be a real man and let others do what they do. In the same manner that you don't want me to interfere with your article, don't interfere with mine. Don't be a hypocrite. +Your edits on Mac-10 You've made the same edit twice now, and two different other editors have reverted it, once me and previously another editor. Can you explain why you think that the reference to the rap star is relevant on Talk:Mac-10? Thank you. +Saju's right. You accused Spine-Cleaver of being me? No no my friend, ask an Admin to use an IP Checker rather than out right banning him. You've made a big mistake. This is going down in the books. Fool....hahahha. -Awliya +Tiger is wrong about cancan girls not wearing panties +Does no-one train these incompetents before hand them their tools? It's like giving paint guns to children. +" Replaceable fair use Image:Maribras.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Maribras.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: Go to the media description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — " +" Speedy deletion of Encyclopedia Nova Caesarea A tag has been placed on Encyclopedia Nova Caesarea, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (talk contribs friendly) " +SHANE AND ALISA ARE SHMEXII!!!!! +" It appears under a subheading about solicitation in the confessional so it needs to be understood in that context. And while ""brute animals"" don't go into the confessional, their owners do; it is talking about the solicitation of owners to animals to allow their animals to be used. And it doesn't talk about sodomy but sex with youths of either sex, which is different. " +I am sure that clarity would help; if only we could agree as to what one would say. The knub of the disagreement comes in the relationship between Acts and the letters. Long arguments have already taken place between those who, supported by scholars such as Conzelman, think Acts to have a comparatively low historical value, emphasising the hostility towards Judaism expressed in Galatians, and those who regard Scripture as consistent de fide so that any one statement must be reconcilable with any other. Critical scholarship makes the second view difficult to hold, though it is represented in the article. the statement about St. Paul's prctice would be controverted on precisely these grounds by a number of editors and, more important, by scholars. It is always hard for editors to cope with the fact that we are not, as a matter of WP policy in a position to say that anything is 'indefensible. That is POV - a point of view. We can say that this learned person or that has argued in this way or that. Whne I last looked at the article it nowhere suggested that St. Paul was a Judaizer; quite the contary as Peter Ballard writes. In short, I fear that one person's clarity may be someone else's POV. Because we have no credibility of ourselves, we must cite someone else, someone who has some scholarly credibility. +How very sad. I have been editing for many years without ever being blocked. If you check my edit history for today yoyu will see that I have spent hours improviing prose and correcting spelling. User talk:BehnamFarid's comments were totally out of order and, yes, I completely lost my rag with this individual, but in the circumstances I think that is understandable. +What do you think about that one File:Vineyards in Napa Valley.jpg? I mean Napa Valley is an important vineyards region, and there's no single image from there. +ok i got blocked without warning or i got blocked for nothing, i understand .... +Don't screw me Hey don't screw me more. Im doing contributions for wikipedia and you are screwing me, what's your problem? Leave me alone, you don't have your own life, like Jenkins in South Park. Leave me alone, you fag. +) Most kids can do it fine. Adults lose flexibility. With a little work an adult can sit in the full lotus with the feet in the right location for a longer period of time. Usually when you start one of your knees is positioned awkardly in mid-air. It takes a while to develop the flexiblity where that knee will descend to the appropriate position.24.21.168.8 05:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC +I have accepted your apology. Maybe our paths will cross again. May the force be with you. +? When does Micro CADAM become Helix Design System? +And the fact that MacEoin and Warburg would refer to it is proof enough of what intellectually bankrupt hacks they truly are, and how valueless anything they have to write truly is. +" ""Journal of Creation - which are peer reviewed by the scientific community and by active working biologists, paelentologists, geologists, researchers, and so on"" You made me laugh with this. Thanks for that. Sorry, you have been lied too. From the moment it came out that ""journal"" has had criticism, not only on its con-tense, but also on the authors and their so called ""Peer review"". It has zero credentials in the scientific community, and is not a reliable source. Never will be. Secondly please read this page, and the main evolution page. Then read the archive talk pages of evolution. If you still then think evolution has not been observed and have a valid criticism, that could be backed up be reliable resources. Like a real scientific paper. Then get back to us. As at the moment not to be crass, you seem quite ignorant about evolution and even the social controversy that is mostly prominent only in America. " +Big Brother Australia 2012 I see you have partially completed the process for nominating Big Brother Australia 2012 as an Article for Deletion. However, you have not completed the process. Are you withdrawing the nomination? +": No, you haven't. Your first approach to me was an attack. I deleted your abusiveness on MY talk page. Why don't you stop now? I've only asked you a dozen times. Do you enjoy fighting? Are you trying to bait me? Or do you just enjoy being mean? I've asked you now a dozen times to propose something that we can discuss - not a criticism ""section"": that is longer than the article was to begin with. This is not discussion. And you know it. SO propose something,m if you wnat to discuss it. I welcome your good-faith effort to negotiate. " +|lisas=Mary Tyler Moore Show, The (opening sequence) +" I'm not here to enrage any tempers, but I do have to step in as an administrator to warn you that you very well can be blocked for your actions today. I have read over the discussion above, and I see that you are talking it out. Blocks are meant to be preventative, not a punishment, so I have not blocked you today. That being said, any further incidents of a personal attack or an edit war (even if 3RR is not hit) will result in a block. Thank you to m.o.p. for facilitating this. The article in question has been fully protected for 4 days to help a consensus come out of this. Happy editing. [[User_Talk:DeltaQuad| (t) ]] (e) " +Calm down chaps. But perhaps you should try to engage more with other contributors, ?. +I'm sorry that this has hapend. I don't know what my dad was thinking, but I wish he would just stay out of my buiness as being a user. I'll try to talk some sinse into him. He claims that you and Sukecci were bullying me when I know you're not. +I have just reported user Sirex for his 3RR violation. Both of those sources are certainly credible. One of them is first hand information from John Juanda and Daniel Negreanu. The second is from a reliable poker news source in PartTimePoker. CNN and the LA Times rarely cover the world of poker and when they do they are anything but reliable. I request that you blog user:sirex for a 3RR violation and instruct him and 2005 to stop deleting this users edits. Both of them seem to think they own the poker content on wikipedia and immediatley delete almost any source added by anybody other than them. Users should not have to throw a fit like I did with 2005 for their edits and contributions to stand. +I'd forgotten I was a member but continue my interest in local history. I'll look for opportunities to get involved. +APOLOGIES Anyone attempting to catch up - have to go offline at short notice for unknown period of time +I truly do not mean to sound the way I seem, but that is quite unfair. Sir, I believe it should be you to have the final say in this matter. I do not think that there is any point in going into a poll. +See Human influenza for a model of how to develop this article. +Edwin van der Sar/Andres Palop Re: your edit summary on Edwin van der Sar, why can't we have it thus? It makes no sense having a player's national team listed if he's made no appearances for the team. I think this may be a topic for the WikiProject as a whole to discuss. – Jay +Fine arts? Is there a reason that this page omits any mention of fine arts degrees at Drake? To read this page one would think that there are no music, theatre, or art departments, much less majors in those fields. Last I knew these were majors in the College of Arts and Sciences... +removal of Original Research this is getting ridiculous. The Sheer volume of agenda driven OR being posted here is getting absurd. Despite the Semi-pro on the page, we're getting lots of editors adding stuff, both as agenda-driven editing, and as Good Faith edits which violate certain policies. I'm adding a comment ot the reactions sections, (each subsection), asking those who prefer to add such info to please bring it to the talk page first, to avoid edits which might be seen as hostile. +wat up mat can u see this +" Gosh, I'm impressed with your diligence I had forgotten about leaving this message! The good news is, I quickly moved on from that page and sought other projects. The bad news is, I subsequently discovered (as you've described) that many policy pages get ""'occupied' permanently by a few editorial 'authorities'."" Between June and August, I made many many hours-long ""improvements"" to policy pages which were quickly reverted. It was very demoralizing, and now I only edit in the article space. I think the best (i.e. most altruistic) account for this phenomenon came from User:SlimVirgin, who suggested that longtime editors often grow to rely on the verbatim text of policies, because (for example) they find it useful to quote the text in disputes with newbies. So that's a legitimate reason why policy pages can become so darn resistant to improvements. I was saddened to see that policy pages are afflicted by chronic sclerosis, but I consider it a learning experience, and I've happily returned to adding material to the article space. Cheers,  talk/WP:Hornbook " +Support as per precedent described by OP (invited here by bot) +It looks like that you want to write up about the Baekuje about two points. One is its relation to the beging of history of Japan with no evidence, and the other is disregarding the alliance with Japan and Baekuje in 5th and 6th cent. Japan sent army and fought with Baekuje against Tang, and Japan accepted Beakuje's royal families as hostage. In this surroundings Japan accepted Baekuje's scholar and several tributes. It was not one-sided. Every one pointed out these facts, but you never agree this simple fact. +" ""A version currently in beta testing has now been developed for (Intel Processor Based) Macintosh OS X (Leopard) v.10.4 and higher."" is incorrect. Version OS X 10.4 was called Tiger and 10.5 Leopard (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X#Versions ). Which should it be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.219.34 Exact versions Version 6.0.2.621 is the last version that still supports Windows Me. Version 7.0.0.125 is the first version that doesn't support Windows Me. Clarification Under the ""Security Flaws"" there is a sentence that says, ""One could let attackers commandeer systems that use it."" with respect to two critical flaws. I believe the statement is too vague to offer any relevant information. It would be good to have a clarification of that statement.174.29.187.27 " +You smartass You read the Introduction to editing!!! +" Your FPC nomination promoted Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Barns grand tetons.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Congratulations! ~ • Talk " +" first of all.......im not going to admit to somehting i didnt fucking do 2.........ive been accused of doing something.......my you......yet you cannot provide proof of that........maybe you should man up and admit that YOU were wrong in jumping to conclusions about me......and do the right thing 3........while you are digging up proof of what you have accused me of doing......maybe you can show me where i ""threatened"" anybody......because nothing i said was a ""threat"" to anybody" +Both song are rotting are brain cells. Lyrics: 7 am waking up in the morning gotta get fresh gotta go down stairs gotta have my bowl gotta ceral ticking on on everybody rushing +":::::I don't understand this. What is going on? Arthur Rubin just blocked me? I mean is this process autocratic? Like anyone can block any time with random allegations? I couldn't help getting deeply insulted by this kind of behaviour. Some one on another page called me ""shit-stirring troll"" or ""MORON"" and told me to ""Fuck off"" because I was asking questions. Now I'm the bad guy? WHAT IS THIS? It all started yesterday when I edited a page Criticism of Islam. Please do check its history. I concede, my previous edit might have not been up to wikipedia standards but the administrator drmies, when I asked him why he reverted the changes, threatened to block me, told me ""be prepared to be blocked""(Now I know he was not the only one to feel that way). I ignored his threat as I was sanguine I was not being impolite or uncivil in any way. So subsequently I edited it for the last time and I truly kept it neutrally Informative (added Information which was not previously there on the page). But somebody reverted the changes again. Then I wanted to know more as to where was I going wrong. They told me that my sources are not reliable and other sources are simply reliable because they say so. Believe me that pretty much sums up their justification for reverting all of my changes.I am not a liar. I loathe sanctimonious Bigots.The truth is, criticism of islam article has so terribly untrue statements for sanitizing muhammad's misconducts and odious commands of Quran. It is less of a criticism of Islam and more of an apologetic exposition, a deadly attempt to justify many obscene misconduct of Muhammad) not to mention it is also fraught with atrocious lies with unreliable references. It is a grievous assault on history itself. No offense, but I think they don't know Islam very well. (Talk if you want) " +EuroVelo map image G'day Quadell. I'm not sure about which category the usage comes under. I looked at the [map] and saw the names of the authors but couldn't see a copyright sign. I do know however that the EuroVelo people were so happy when I sent them an e-mail to tell them I had made a Wikipedia page that they put my name up on their website. Now when I do a Google search for me name I get that site at the top of the list!! +Archive it and forget about +When did I mention GameSpot? IGN AND AMAZON WONT LIST A FAKE GAME! For fucks sake, TRP, stop being ignorant and stop acting as If you're never wrong! - +Wait a minute please Regarding the Nuremberg Laws edit, did you check those references to see what they said, and whether they are credible? I actually did. I made a sound judgment call that the references cited did not support the assertion in the article. I would also argue that the blurbs on the US Holocaust Museum webpage is not a reliable source, as that page does not cite its sources. How much time did you put into checking the references? I'd say none. That is not good, since you are susceptible to being tricked by bogus references. +Going to Bed already? Going to Bed already? It only 3pm. Better take your Bottle and Blankie with you. Your mommy waiting for you. +" RfA etc I respect your change of opinion, and admire your style greatly. I addressed your question to me in the RfA on the basis that it referred to the recent departures of ''' (Talk) " +Also I will, from now on, keep my pings to a minimum, and only to those who would like them. +Looks at the edit history of TAR17* Yeesh...some people don't get the message. But this is exactly the problem. People are so dedicated to >> and << that they're afraid of anything else, like the Sideways U's. This is why I'm thinking that the >><< should stay because if you change them all to U's, you're going to have to undo a lot of edits...174.1.48.24 +CFD templates Hey, while filling in some category gaps I noticed that the templates from your withdrawn CFD for LGBT state legislators were still on the categories. I deleted the ones from the categories I was working with but I thought admins might have a tool for doing them faster? +" Also, I uploaded two images of Jerry Remy and Don Orsillo. (Look at the articles) How would I make the images bigger? (Talk) " +I don't care. The whole concept of A inserts, B comes along and amends, C comes along and amends, is absurd. It works when it works. It doesn't work when it doesn't work. Why give my time, if some arsehole with his or her own agenda is going to come along and delete my efforts? It is a stupid system. +Another item: Seems that Fecal coliform bacteria could/should redirect to E. coli. As this would be the first redirect that I edit, I am throwing up a flag. Occurs to me that after a redirect, another more learned user can undo it, so it is alright to be bold here. +What? Who? Where? When? Why?99.141.241.135 +Fuck off you jumped up lying cunt. +" Well, two counter-points and an attempt to help you see the main point again. First, you authoritatively state yellowcake would ""barely qualify"" as a dirty bomb but it is not clear what standard you are using since the AP article states the following. ""Exposure carries well-documented health concerns associated with heavy metals such as damage to internal organs, experts say. ""The big problem comes with any inhalation of any of the yellowcake dust,"" said Doug Brugge, a professor of public health issues at the Tufts University School of Medicine"". Second, the AP article notes there is ""remaining radioactive debris"" at Tuwaitha. I'm not sure if you've been on the ground (I leave that possibility open) but unless you have a source to back up your point, the AP article reads like there is other material there that are radiological. But if we are actually reasoning together you will see that is not my main point about why we should post the AP article. The AP source reaffirms that Iraq did have WMD material; known or unknown it not the point. You claim yellowcake is not WMD material but the Canadians bought it to make nuclear energy so your definition of WMD material seems personal. The reader of this entry on WMD should know that Iraq had this material and if not, this section of the site is imbalanced. That is my point." +" BruceGrubb's edit Bruce added, more than once, a paragraph sourced to http://jdstone.org/, defending it on the basis that it's a "".org site"". No. It abjectly fails WP:RS. It could be .va and still be worthless as a source, the site has no identifiable authority, it's a polemical anti-Christian site and if we can't source that content from a much better authority then we're not going o include it period. Guy () " +Cultural appropriation Wrong. The caption is not POV. You obviously jumped the gun, because I was still writing my explanation of the revert when you sent me a note. Read my comments in the discusion. +Arjun MBT Can you deny that the trials be it in winter or summer is part of AUCRT? +" GoodDay, the countries category is called just that, not 'Independant countries'. Wales, Scotland and England are countries (NI is not, but that's another matter). As they are countries they belong in the countries category, perfectly logically. In any case, this has been discussed repeatedly and the consensus is - as if we needed to be told! - that they are countries. Despite my opposition to the inclusion of the Six Counties - English Wikipedia has followed the political line of the New Labour UK government, a lie line which is contrary to the Belfast Agreement - I am tempted to agree with the compromise 'Category:Countries of the United Kingdom' but would like to hear other people's opinion as well. It's disappointing and somewhat surprising that such a significant change has attracted so little comment. Perhaps what we really need here in the long term is a clearer practical distinction between the terms 'country' and 'sovereign state'. BritishWatcher says above that he ""supported and accepted the fact England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland should be called countries"" but opposes them ""appearing on lists of countries (where only sovereign states are listed)"". Therein lies the nub of the problem - the argument that although E, S and W are in fact countries they should not be listed as countries: talk about Alice in Wonderland! " +/ I mean have you even seen his userpage? +" It's very close. I'll see if can address some issues. There isn't much left to do, would hate to see this one fail. (talk) " +MADAMBOT- PL NOTE THAT THE ORIGINAL SITE DRAMATECH.IN NOW HAS THE FOLLOWING NOTICE: The text of this website [or page] is released under the Creative Commons Zero Waiver 1.0 (CC0). +Good Grief! How would the chimps get drunk? Anyways, Today(2-17-09) On the news, a woman in conneticut was attacked by her friend's,(over 200 pound)chimpanzee. He was huge! HE ripped her apart and ate her face off. shouldn't chimp attacks be in the chimp article? BEcause i didn't see anywhere about chimps attacking humans 173.51.203.228 +EVula likes having gay sex with men! +" Glad you like the new look! There should be a separate ""user"" menu (which, confusingly, is in normal text style, not a big link) next to the main menu rollover which appears for user links. The rationale is that it should stop the menu growing incredibly large. Maybe this is a bad idea.... see Wikipedia_talk:Navigation_popups. Suggestions welcome! |talk|popups " +REDIRECT Talk:Prince William of Baden +The PTC is not a critic, but a parents group. They are not reliable for critical reaction. Thank you. +And, observe this article in CityNews Toronto, which says something rather different. But, you will perhaps contend that a local news outlet is biased as well. Amidst all of this, despite the passage of 4 months, nary an editor has even refined the article. Perhaps you can blow smoke elsewhere? 70.54.134.84 +ARE YOU SERIOUS??? ''I WAS JUST TRYNA BE NICE BY THANKING YOU FOR A PROFESSIONAL DISCUSSION BUT YOU DELETE WHAT I HAD TO SAY, I NEVER SAID I LIKED YOUR OLD ASS LIKE THAT, FUCK YOU TOO!!!!!!! BROOKLYN ALL DAY EVERYDAY, NEW YORK STAND UP +" Well, because I see no reason not to. NuclearWarfare wrote two guides while he was a clerk, and even outgoing arbs have written guides. And I am ending this discussion, because I don't think that I should have to put up with your repeated sniping. chen7754 The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion." +My thoughts Kinghy was right... you're a civility nazi. I hope you will change (or have changed) your ways. +", 10 September 2007 (UTC) No, I don't think I did Blnguyen - I can't believe I got as many as I did, and I can't believe your name isn't anywhere on WP:200.... Talk 07:52" +(who was actually naturalized french too, but for the purposes of those mosaics I'd certainly consider him to be just russian +Please note, Korean and Japanese languages have identical grammar not similar grammar.Korsentry +"::::: How is saying ""At least they are historians and not terrorists"" to be construed as attacking another religion ? Saying someone is an historian is attacking a religion ? I did not know that ""historian"" has any abusive connotations, please correct me if my knowledge of English is wrong and historian is an abuse. I really need to understand how this can be seen as an example of "" Extremist-style one way traffic"". And your equating me with Osama is a personal attack, Please! being an admin and an arbcom admin at that some restraint is expected of you. Cool down Sir and be civil. It is a wind up, and you having warned me of windups should know better. Please do walk the talk. If you were not so bent in trying to show my faults, you would in the same section as you have linked to above also find my response to your current accusation, which said it is ""not the number of times Subhash was banned by Blnguyen but the number of times he should have been and he was let off"". So it would seem that someone who cannot read is busy worrying about the counting ability of another.And this issue was discussed last year, the time to respond was then, at that time you were also asked direct questions by me, which you chose to ignore. And that an arbcom member is so bent of fighting with a mere editor and besmirching him must be also a source of great pride for some. I have not commented on your religion or your country, you have on mine. Shows who has attacked people based on national identities or religion. So that too must make someone very proud. Defending a person, or standing up for them does not mean one agrees with every statement that they may have made. Show me where I have defended Bhaisaab's anti religion comments. So you have now made another false claim above that I defend anti semetic speech. By the same generalisation what would you say about an admin not even reacting to an virulent anti Muslim speech made by his protege, even after I posted it on the admin's talk page ? Further that admin's defending his protege then makes the admin (by your logic above) a defender of anti Muslim speech!. That I an editor with no powers is fighting a biased and prejudiced person, misusing his position , is a great source of pride for me. Also please do note that since the arbcom elections I have not bothered to be involved with you, till you went about posting details about me;and your attempt to trace my location , to an editor hostile to me. So rather than me bent on besmirching you as you seem to potray, the fact is that my opposing you on the arbcom has got me special attention from you, which is gross abuse of your position. " +He may be referring to a different article but I can't find the same name in search. Should we just leave the date out for now until we do have a more reliable source? +" Background on Coral I think it would be beneficial to find out some things about his childhood, as it could have influenced his killing sprees. Reading this, I would assume he had a pathological hate toward women, perhaps because of his mother, but all of the woman he attacked were white. Perhaps he attacked the ""perfect woman"" in order to punish his mother for what he thought she should have been. Of course I could be completely wrong." +I'm sure, Proabivouac, that you have read the page. You will know then, that Southphilly's reverts here and here are against consensus. Maybe you can do something? (Have a nice day!) +January 2008 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. +If you think it works, would you be so kind as to help nominate it as I am not really good at that kind of stuff? Thanks! +The public/secret dichotomy is false, the term 'front' is used in communist parlance as a euphemism for 'sector'. I'm not sure, if merged, what material from the Communist front article is to be added here? This article has a better passage on mass organizations (which needs referencing), but the Communist front article is 1) grossly US-centric and 2) filled with insinuatory wordings. It contains extremly little factual substance to be included here. +/Archive 5 < 1 July 2004 +|How much longer until I can edit pages again?}} +Alright, I changed it to the longer description of viewers' feelings, for lack of a better single word.- +Oh, am I the first to mention this? And it has come to pass. +" Read the . Contentions from two sides of this dispute are not equally worthless. Decision is up to you. (Talk?) [ (New thread?)] " +" Thank you! Logan, thank you so much for the very thoughtful Birthday Greeting to me, it meant something and I appreciate it. Take care and best wishes! NS " +Not only in U.S but Canada too Even before back before this, economics wise whatever happens in the United States also effects Canada. It was the same in Ontario, and probably Quebec too. Many Railroad companies went bust during this time. Many that were just started or were very young went bankrupt...and was the probably the first round of mergers of railroad companies.69.165.153.200 +I'm trying to work on that. +Thought you'd be ashamed... which is why I didn't want to identify you. If you'd prefer to be identified I have no problem accommodating you. +" The exiled map! This map is alive only on my personal pages (since I created it) as an exile because of a dispute with 2 bias posters. There attitude was poor and they ultimately both disproved there nonsense and made me leave the U.K. railways in distress. Flaimers? The false 'allegations' were- No time frame- It was on the map's title. Bias because more accidents coming from English speaking states to the English Wikipedia- If that is of concern, then the Wikipedia article I used as a source is also guilty. Bias because America has a big and busy railway- India has a world rebound railway, witch is both an example of big and busy! As for the non-stop life of the Japanese, German and British railways! Noting the un-note-worthy- I literally copied the Wikipedia article in to a map, so that also goes back to say, that if anything, the article needs a good tidy up. Name your sources- The Wikipedia article it was attached to. To may variables to decipher- Were they indirectly questioning the whole article’s itegraty, since the map was only a literal coppy of the on-screen text. Portrayed America in a poor light- If that's so, what about India, they were running a close second for 'Most rail crashes between 1950 and 2006. ""Whats good for the goose is good for the gander"" as we say in the U.K. The flamers never noticed- They did not notice that I have missed of Eritrea's new railway or that Libya dose not have a railway, and said nothing when I corrected the map. Updates. I am updating it to cover the full time span from when the first incident was listed in 1815 to January 1st 2007" +" - that's your opinion. I didn't say I “want to delete one article that meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria without merging the information”. You do understand what it means to refrain from putting words in others' mouth, right? I just said, ""I don't like the idea of merging, even a bit."" What is so wrong in that? I don't like it. - Are you referring to the possibility of me sending you something obscene and redundant? If that's what you're concerned about, be informed that it won't happen. The thing is, for some reason I just wanted to chat with you in private. I don't know if that in itself is inappropriate, or not. here " +" >There are many things like this. Doctrines are fairly stable. Explanations come >and go. Doctrines need not be understood to be believed. Doctrines are believed >on the basis that their source is God, not depending on whether they are >understood. Mkmcconn — That's a very a-historical point of view. The church was coming out with doctrinal statements about the trinity, and the Arians were twisting them and believing them. So the church went back and clarified what they meant. That's why some of the creeds are quite amazingly pedantic. It's also a non-sensical point of view. You can't believe a bunch of words devoid of underlying meaning. You either believe them as they were meant, you mis-interpret them and thus mis-believe them, or you pretend to believe them. But there is no such thing as believing them without having a modicum of understanding. Sure you can believe some words are ""from God"" but not know what they mean, but then you don't believe the doctrine you believe that there are some words that are true. >If you read a few dozen explanations on the begottenness of the Son from a >spectrum of historical and contemporary sources, including Augustine, you will >not find that this doctrine is connected to theories of time, despite what the >deleted section claims about these theories being the ""root"" of the doctrine. Apparently you didn't read what Augustine wrote. Let me refresh your memory... ""Your today yields not with tomorrow, for neither does it follow yesterday. Your today is eternity; therefore You begat the Co-eternal, to whom You said, 'This day have I begotten Thee.' Thou hast made all time; and before all times You are, nor in any time was there not time."" Augustine directly links God being external to time with the begetting of the Son. Now if you have a different point of view, prove it! Otherwise it is just hand-waving and show. > Don't understand the sentence above. Pfortuny People are interested in the relationship between biblical doctrine and science. What is the problem with a ONE LINE reference? >Now my question is, have any published theologians linked Einstein's theories >about time with the eternity of God? There's plenty of people thinking about this issue. Lewis is a published theologian is he not? Here is a paper from a college dealing with it.... http://www.behindthegrove.org.uk/resources/essays/God_Time.rtf >Probably (but this is my oppinion) very little more (if more) than the >tautology ""not created, not made, and without a beginning"". Pfortuny 17:46, 5 >May 2004 (UTC) Instead of opinions, let's have have evidence from church fathers. >No, it is not that the filioque is fact or oppinion what matters here. What >matters here is what the doctrine of the Church is, not what it means, what it >refers to or whatever. Pfortuny The doctrine of the church is important, but what it means is irrelevant? Come on!! Why look up Wik if not to find out what something means? You don't need Wik to read the Athanasian creed. You need Wik to *understand* it in its historical context. > To answer your first question, the Church defines which beliefs are dogma Then point me to where I can buy a book or books which is the final word on Christian dogma. Then I can verify for myself what parts of this article are dogma and which are opinion. Don't say the bible because it doesn't mention eternal generation. >For Orthodox at least, it's a ""theological opinion"" that Mary lived a sinless >life Ah huh! But for Catholics it is DOGMA. Thus what is and isn't dogma the OPINION of different churches and persons. At the end of the day folks, I have taken a quote from a church father that directly addresses the issue of ""eternally begotten"" to explain to the reader the meaning. To take it down you would have to show either a) Augustine was out of step with the rest of the church at this point. b) The church was so confused, there are too many theories to discuss. But to just say ""let it be a mystery! Don't tell them what it means!"", sorry that doesn't wash. " +TAB Sub: Application For the Post of Research Assistant Ref: Your advertisement in Eenadu daily. It is a Great pleasure of me to introduce myself to you through this letter. I M.V.S. Rao, had done my M.L.I.Sc., and did M.A. In Political Science in Nagarjuna University. As I am in search of Challenging career in Library and Information Science. I hope you would give me an opportunity to prove my self in this regard. I assure you that the best of my services and promise to live your expectations. You will agree that I can be a real asset to your esteemed Organization I enclose my C.V. Along with this application. Thanking you in anticipation. Place: Hyderabad Date: 16th December 2007 Signature: +I think its pretty good, and should pass the FAC. +" No such ""compromise"" was reached on September 26 and no such ""consensus"" exists. " +I am rehashing the same argument as before. Which is why I suggest a roll-back to just keeping the text directly beneath the RFC banner. Do you agree with that? That we should delete everything we've said below the banner? +OK, I have tried as per above. +Your accusation that I am Astbam Please note that it was Astbam who put the seed into the mind of Davey that the Nu-Venture article should be deleted for lack of notability. I only got involved in Wikipedia 10 days later, in an effort to keep it. Since the common interest in Nu-Venture at around the same time was the only part of your accusation which I thought had any real substance to it, would you please consider withdrawing the accusation, now that it appears to have been misguided (you perhaps didn't make the connection because it wasn't Astbam who actually made the proposal, and for some reason he didn't actually follow that suggestion up by voting delete himself either). Whatever people think of me, I'm not the sort of idiot who goes around getting articles put up for AFD just so I can then say they should be kept. Everything else you have presented is easily explained by the fact Davey and Charles do the same things to the same people for the same apparent reasons, meaning it's more than likely to piss the victims off in the same way. That's all that happened here. +" Alternative: ""Leyte"" as disambiguation page. In my experience, and thanks to the WWII battles, the island and the gulf are the primary topics (plural) for ""Leyte"". I think that in this case our readers would be better served by having ""Leyte"" as the disambiguation page, and all specific content just one click away. — Such an arrangement would have the added advantage of facilitating the work of editors and general maintenance (checking Special:WhatLinksHere/Leyte would suffice to know which wikilinks need correction), thus further aiding in ensuring that our readership gets a better content across Wikipedia, and not just in this specific article. " +Read the above numbskull, would one of you vegetables please get a move on and block this I.P. I ain't leaving until this address is blocked so hop to it please assholes.. + +I'm still working through the book, but it has a lot of details which would be of benefit to expanding the Hockey stick controversy article. +""" but I object and have unstruck " +" WP:RFBOT Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. Query me! " +" TFA nomination Hello there. For the May 25 TFA nomination I was initially going to nominate Heinrich Bar for that position, but I see that you've taken up my slot. Is it possible that we can move the date of the May Revolution to an earlier one? I understand that it occurred throughout the week and not just on May 25. © (talk)" +" A list such as describe did exist until just recently. The result of the debate was ""delete"", and now it's gone. " +For the record, I don't know who 24.30.67.158 is. David, you are wrong. Open input is not allowed by this little gang, and you would not appreciate harassment would you? If you agree with these people then you have supremacist sympathies also. You have not studied the situation fully. +" Timeline This is a timeline of jewellery production from the first uses of metal in history to the Renaissance. 7000 BC - Uses of copper in Anatolia, Iran and Eastern Europe. 5000 BC - Uses of copper in Egypt. 4000 BC - Smelting technology for copper in Egypt and Iran. 3450 BC - Use of natural zinc/copper alloy in Egypt. 3500 BC - Gold makes an appearance in Egyptian jewellery. 3000 BC - Egypt and Iran makeing simple hammered iron beads 3000 BC - The Middle East employ semi-mass-production 2000 BC - First signs of the swagging technique 2600 BC - Beaded wires began to be used. 2500 BC - Egyptians using copper/lead alloys. 2500 BC - True iron production technology in Near East. 2500 BC - The intentional addition of silver and copper to gold. 2500 BC - Gold wires are characterised by seam lines that follow a spiral path along the wire. 2000 BC - Use of patterned punches 1500 BC - Earplugs and earrings become popular in Egypt. 1400 BC - Egypt Amarna period, using resin and mud for repoussé backing. 1400 BC - Deliberate addition of zinc to copper in Canaan. 1400 BC - Philistines have iron. 1400 BC - Very copper rich gold alloys popular in Egypt. 1000 BC - Persian sheet bronze work 0.05mm thick. 1000 BC - The start of true engraving. 900 BC - The Greeks have iron. 700 BC - World's oldest coinage in Lydia. 575 BC - In Greece, jewellery is still very rare. 500 BC - Hafted hammers were being used in some parts. 500 BC - Iron in use in the British Isles 400 BC - Greeks using Beeswax for filler in repoussé. 350 BC - Use of combined punches and dies of bronze. 325 BC - Animal or human-headed hoop earrings were popular. 300 BC - Diadems are first seen. 300 BC - Red Coral popular in Celtic jewellery. AD 50 - Start of the Roman period, where addition of silver to gold becomes almost unknown. AD 100 - Sulphur fills hollow gold items throughout the Roman Empire. AD 150 - Tin rings found in Nubia AD 300 - Lead becomes more common in places. AD 400 - Pewter jewellery is made. AD 400 - A shale die is found on Great Britain. AD 1500 - The Renaissance AD 1900 - Art Nouveau jewellery Famous jewellers Elias Akaoui founder of Akaoui stores in Cairo, Egypt. Paolo Bulgari Chairman of Bulgari. Pierre Cartier Co-founder of Cartier SA Peter Carl Fabergé Russian jeweller best known for the fabulous Fabergé eggs Ian Harris Jewellery expert to the BBC's Antiques Roadshow, Director of N. Bloom & Son Scott Kay Founder of Scott Kay Inc., a bridal jewelry company. Kenneth Jay Lane founder of Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc. Robert Lee Morris influential in the jewelry-as-art movement Charles Lewis Tiffany founder of Tiffany & Co.. Sotirios Voulgaris founder of Bulgari. Sound of jewellery The sound of jewellery has played an enermous part in many stories, poems, and religious literature (more details and sources to come). Different jewellery creates different sounds, ie plastic bangles create a high pitched clink sound, while others such as baxelite produce a ""clunck"" sound. Knowing how a particular piece of jewellery sounds can help someone identify whether or not a piece of jewellery is fake. Indeed people have written about the sound of ""fake gold"", and jewel makers such as Sharon Alouf, a famous jeweler have praised the high frequency pitched noise of gold bangles(most likely real gold she is wearing). To this day, the jeweler claims, ""the sound of bangles clinking together is very soothing to me. It always reminds me of motherhood.""Alouf is even partial to particular tones. ""Gold produces my favorite sound,"" she says, ""the pitch is higher and clearer, which I find energizing."" " +" On August 12 an IP from EUMETSAT changed some of the capitalization followed immediately by (same person?). Does this make it authoritive? It certainly seems that EUMETSAT have their own convension, but many others uses the capitalization as originally provided in this article, such as this one from the UK's Met Office and from Space Flight Now and from RMETS.ORG and this one of the owners and of course the ESA links. However, this article from the Guardian and this from the BBC follow EUMETSAT's convension. Also, the Met Office can't make up their minds as with this article . EUMETSAT might be the operators but are they the authority in the naming convention used? Anyway, if there are no objections after a suitable period to give time for other editors to review this I see no reason not to make the change.  Chat  " +Sure. Thanks for calling... +E mail I have sent you an email re ip that is vandalising. +" Hey Sorry I kept deleting your comment that I didn't like at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Huge (2nd nomination). I didn't know that deleting other user's comments on an AfD discussion was considered vandalism. " +A new essay, Wikipedia:Merge what?, seems to speak well to this situation. 18:33, 27 +Hey, genius You last worked on that article 2 years ago. You've had 2 years to fix the reference, and you've been too lazy. And now you dare to whine because I happened to have noticed it? Fix your problem. Do not delete valid tags. 99.238.74.216 +Hum im staying outta this one. +" Oxonian2006, my tone may sound a bit out of control but I'm not. Issues like this one are very important to me due to my own family history. Now, going further into your comment...unfortunately the knowledge of the occupation of Poland is not as universal as you may think. To many ""the Nazis"" does not mean the Germans as you suggested. Poland was not occupied by the ""Nazis"" who came from ""Greenland or Mars"" or ""Nazi allies"". Poland was occupied by the Nazi Germany or German Army (Wehrmacht) and at the beginning of the war also by the Soviet Union or Red Army. There were no other German allied troops occupying Poland unless you count Italian, Spanish and other Waffen SS troops marching to the Eastern Front. ""The German-led Nazi occupation"" you suggested is also incorrect, there was no such thing. Half of Poland was incorporated into the Third Reich with their citizens either murdered or expelled into the ""General Government"" which was created and %100 controlled by the Nazi Germany, nobody else. Therefore he ""Nazi"" is NOT a perfectly good word to use in this case and never will be. Now, about the Polanski who in your opinion is not a Holocaust survivor. Well...he escaped the Cracow Ghetto on the way to the extermination camp. He would be dead otherwise. Then he barely survived hiding at sympathetic to him farmers barn avoiding the Germans who would kill him immediately if found. Every Jew hiding outside the Ghettos was immediately shot by the Germans. His rescuers and rescuers family was also killed. I don't dare to suggest that you did not know about that. Every Jew who survived the war in Poland is a Holocaust survivor and it does not matter if he managed to survive Auschwitz, Cracow Ghetto or by hiding in the forest. They all survived that hell, so did Polanski. " +"Welcome, ! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions! You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself. You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum. I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions. - at " +"the point of view"" ""In 1999, US military aircraft bombed the Zastava factory as part of the NATO peacekeeping operation in Kosovo. The attack targeted the military production site of the Zastava plant and as a result of it's close proximity, major damage was caused to the civil production site as well. it is a fact in history that the yugo factory was directly targeted, and not collateral damage. the is a provable fact, and it needs it be corrected. " +" Gave specific year when Daniel began his travels. Changed ""Kievsky"" to ""Daniel"". The reference Anzovin said: The first Russian travel writer was Daniel of Kiev, called in Russian Daniel Kievsky or Daniil Polomnik (the Pilgrim). talk " +" Bitemyshinymetalass78: I don't think you will get a supportable reason, other than even more rants from CJ DUB wanting to include the muscle and sports car labels to the Camaro. It seems as if all the material that explains the classification in books about pony cars does not matter. Even CJ DUB's statements that true factory muscle models are not ""muscle cars"" is contrary to reality. It also seems unusual to clam that muscle cars began in 1972! Even books written for children (Wild about Muscle Cars by J. Poolos) have the correct history! " +" Narvin A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Narvin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Narvin. " +you seam like a fucking hot and kinky person and i would like to bang the shit out of you +" Hi, Please STOP creating the article that doesn't fails notability. If you believe that the article 'Sarah Smith' should be existed, please discuss on talk page. Thanks. 5127 " +In the WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Troubles/Archive (which you cited above), User:Brandon suggested the following range blocks on 31 October, 2009. 99.135.168.0/21 99.141.240.0/20 99.142.0.0/20 99.144.240.0/20 These were blocked for three months, but the blocks expired. Do you think that another three months would be worthwhile? +QUIT EDITING CHICAGO MED YOU ARE SO STUPID, HOW CAN SOMEONE POST ON HERE AND GET IT VERFIED WITHOUT YOU CHANGING IT, INFORMATION POSTED ON HERE THATS CITED IS NOT COPYRIGHT. ARE YOU FROM AMERICA U IDIOT GET A LIFE. STOP RUINGING CHICAGO MEDS PAGE +You're a nuisance. Go conjugate with a pair of maple trees you cocksucking faggot. LULZ LULZ! +to be unblocked so my pupils can do a specdial project. They will be punished severely. - Ms. Susan Adamson, English 10th grade +My RfA Hi Winhunter, I just wanted to say thanks for choosing not to give me an oppose. As i'm sure you can appreciate i wasn't too happy with 8 Opposes (inc. 2 strongs) within an hour of nomination just wanted to let you known it meant a lot Thanks )|talk +You obviously didn't read what they are writing, or you're just someone who doesn't care. I'm trying to work within the policies and every time I turn around one of you jerkwads pulls another thing out of thin air because you don't make any of this crap findable in the first place and use it to beat people over the head for your own sick amusement apparently. +" licenced radio station only operates in kilmore township, but registered as a broadcast licence (i.e. not an illegal or ""pirate"" radio service). is placed in list of Australian Radio Stations on wikipedia." +" Montpellier caps I don't where you found your capitalisation source. It's certainly not standard French usage see the following pages on the Opéra national de Montpellier website for example: http://www.opera-orchestre-montpellier.fr/francais/bill_info.html En raison des travaux effectués à l'Opéra Comédie, la billetterie de l'Opéra et Orchestre national Montpellier Languedoc-Roussillon sera située exclusivement au Corum Par correspondance: Opéra et Orchestre national Montpellier / Le Corum CS 89024 http://www.opera-orchestre-montpellier.fr/index.html L’Opéra et l’Orchestre national de Montpellier vont essayer, désormais réunis, .. http://www.opera-orchestre-montpellier.fr/francais/rep_lyrique_Rusalka.html Chœurs de l’Opéra national de Montpellier Languedoc-Roussillon Orchestre national Montpellier Languedoc-Roussillon Can you back your changes out, please? " +" ""For any sane person, the latter is the biggest controversy related to the 2010 CWG."" – If you can find the sources that raise this point, then you are more than welcome to add this in the article. There's no need to insult those who are working hard to add reliable information and sources to this article. Our job is not to add our own POV. – " +THESE BOOTS ARE MADE OF PUPPIES. YOU SICK PEOPLE. +Original poster, I know eaxactley what you're talking about. This loser whats Wiki to roll around a ball of perfection. If I want to the Hitler board and said he hated jews, this idiot will probably ask for a resource. - Goldstann +" Cesc Fabregas The English transfer window opened on June 10th, not July 1st as you so wrongly stated. Therefore the transfer is officially valid. Fabregas himself confirmed the transfer by stating ""Wenger turned me down, so I've joined Chelsea to win some trophies"" all parties have confirmed the deal. I really don't understand why you're being so stubborn about this. Everybody has confirmed he's joining Chelsea and the English transfer window has already opened." +Hungarian names for places before 1867 Hi, as the official language of the Kingdom of Hungary was Latin until 1867 , using Hungarian names for cities etc. before this date is anachronistic. Since the Latin name that was used at the time can scarcely be found, we should list all the places with their modern names. Thank You. +I agree Daniel, it is also important to maintain the section in a simple format since it is supposed to be a brief description of Brazilian history. I don’t believe we need changes in this section, we already have links to more specific articles that will mention the Constitutionalist Revolution or the Encilhamento. Regards, 1st Agree with what Paulista? If he said nothing of what you're saying. He even might say, but read what he wrote and see that he did not speak about briefness characteristic. BTW​​, just curious that you have now appeared, and even without disputing any of my denunciations, including the unethical use of briefness characteristic as a excuse! +" What is your connection with the IP ? — v^_^v Bori! " +Ah, another thing: before to implement the new template set, even acronyms were supported (take a look at Template:flagicon if you want know more). What I did is just to make a porting from the old standard to the new one (and, trust me, I have found so many articles which used acronyms). Ciao. +In what sense do you find the article dishonest, Koncord? Is tedium relevant to Wikipedia standards? +I DID IMPROVE THE TOPIC, BY ASKING TO NOT BE SPAMMED IN EVERY ARTICLE WITH PICS OF JIMMY. WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS YOUR OPINION, ITS NOT A FACT. +???? WHAT KIND OF THING? +" Although I'm guessing if you do it with a user name of ""status"" they will kowTow." +2011 (UTC) TBH, the Hogwarts COA is heraldically trite and since it wasn't granted by the College of Arms it is classed as false arms but there should be at least some adherence to the rules! 【遯卋山人】 17:26, 24 August +REDIRECT Talk:Cam Ranh Base +(UTC) An even better idea - feed murderers to komodo dragons. It will make prisons safer and more spacious, marginally reduce the worlds human population and keep one of the best reptiles in the world alive. Win-win. 24.77.19.12 23:49, 10 February 2008 +Well OK then. How about if I just say - If you try hard enough you can always find a reason to use some term other than British Isles, and boy! are some people trying hard at the moment! +Not an unjust threat Do not contribute to a topic unless you wish to contribute to it constructively. That is not an unjust thread. Perhaps if you would do research, you would be wrong less often. Thanks. +Listen Brah You are the rudest wiki nerd in this joint. I bet you're sitting behind that computer in a chair that has the sweet impression of your ass that never moves from it. Are you wasting time till the next World of Warcraft is coming out? Does mom care that you're on here ruining lives for the rest of us fun loving wikipedia users? Did the money your grandparents sent you in a singing card by the suped up fucktarded laptop you're rocking? Here's some advice, take up Dance Dance Revolution and leave us awesome and normal people trying to make awesome Wiki pages alone. Bastard. +, as it deals with the company's chairman +" The one on his right shoulder? What about it? He's born in the US, but have chosen to represent South Vietnam in MMA. He also has a Brazilian one on his left which I guess is because he have trained there or something...  (t / c) " +SWaP Classic Hi there. I took a look at the article you created and noted a few issues with it. If you could please resolve them in a timeley fasion that would be great. Currently I don't see the notability demonstrated so my feeling is that it should be removed. If you can provide more verifyable references that would be great. +Assessment Wikipedia:Good article criteria It's not the quantity of material that is holding this article back- but the lack of accurate in-line quotes. It is obvious that people care about the prose and the structure but a little time spent getting the citations right would be more useful. So an afternoon spent in the library with a copy of J A Graham and B A Phythian putting page numbers to the citations would be helpful. Learn to use the citation reference system, you can use the Didsbury page to see exactly how references should be placed. Be aware that the school website may not be considered a reliable independent source for other than trivial facts (such as timing of the school day). Imagine what the article would look like if all the paragraphs that are not supported by inline quotes are zapped- in can happen! Help is almost instantly available by putting a request on this page. +\ Your revision to Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz Thanks for catching the misspell of Atushi Ojisama and Ijigen Waltz! I'll work on moving the page to the correct spelling. +" I don't know what ""reasons"" you mean, but feel free to initiate such a discussion. (I'm fairly busy at the moment, so my participation might be limited.) — " +Draft DYK hook: ... that Islamic Gibraltar (Moorish Castle pictured) was called the City of Victory and lasted for over 725 years, far longer than Spanish or British Gibraltar? +A plea for consistency in entries When people are listed on these date pages, please can I ask that the information given matches that on their web page. Far too often it does not. Description of nationality is a particular issue. There are a number of hyphenated references for nationality. Is there a protocol in Wikipedia for listing nationality? It seems to me that if someone is born a certain nationality they don't stop being that nationality even if they work or live in other countries. The only change is if they renounce their original nationality. Description of British nationality also seems an issue. On his wiki page Julian Byng is described as a British army officer. On the page for September 11 he was described as an 'English army officer'. Post 1700s this is incorrect. There is no 'English' army. I have corrected this to match his wiki page. +Uh, yeah you're right; the indef block seems a little harsh, if you ask me. I was just doin' some reference desk action and making what I believed to be a constructive recommendation to the AN/I douches. Admins have evolved into ruler-wielding hardasses to a greater degree than when I was active a few years ago. I guess I'll have to use another accont or go back to editing from my iPhone if I want to keep using the Reference Desk. ho-hum. +" Editor review Hey Nish, I'm currently up for Editor Review. I would be most appreciative if you could comment on my Wikipedia habits there and offer some advice. Thanks in advance. Thanks for the Editor Review. I honestly, truely know that I do not want to become a Wikipedia Admin. However, I hold the same thoughts towards Wikipedia as I do towards the US military: Given the choice, I would never join up, but my personal philosophy of national service (I agree with the idea of mandatory national service of some sort, whether it be community service or military) compels me so that I plan to join the US military in some form in the future. The problem I currently face with Wikipedia is that I'm constantly fighting an uphill battle in both the preservation of information and the adding of new information to Wikipedia. Often, something that I hope to be small edit becomes a huge issue due to vandalism, edit wars, extremely overly burecratic Wikipedians (example: those who like to delete almost every image from topics under the fair use policy), etc. I don't want to end up like many of the former Admins who came to Wikipedia to add information and stayed because they became Admins and spent all their time putting out fires. However, as Wikipedia will experience exponential growth within the next decade (it will plateau when the Internet finally reaches into the third world in a big way), and with that growth will come a huge number of vandals. Honestly, I believe Wikipedia now can use 10x the number of Admins. I can't even imagine how bad it might get on here (with vandals) in a decade or so when the number of Admins has grown at a steady pace but the number of vandals is huge due to the rapid growth of Wikipedia and the Internet in general. I would prefer to not be an Admin, but I'm willing to put up with whatever it takes to preserve the good info of Wikipedia while ensuring that new info can be added properly. Any thoughts on this? EDIT: Also, I'd like to expand my Vandal Fighting activities, but I'm not sure if I should get external programs like VandalProof. I do patrol newpages every now and then, and in the process catch many vandals. However, I usually cannot punish these vandals because of the WP:AGF policy and the fact that warnings really do nothing to repeat vandals. I'll try my best. Alexander Litvinenko You left this comment on my talk page: Umm...you stated that you shortened the intro here as per WP:LEAD. We were discussing the intro on the talk page, and I would have appreciated it if you would go back and discuss the intro's status on the talk page. I am restoring back the intro section, and you can make minor changes if you wish, but please don't make drastic changes without discussing. Thanks. By the way, keep up the great work with the article. =) Hopefully we can pull this to GA or FA in the near future. Best, Nishkid64 I've discussed the article on the talk page: The introduction is way too rambling and detailed which is why I shortened it. Please read WP:LEAD which recommends it is concise. Also some of the sentences don't flow well. The first sentence was a Russian Security Service agent [with a link to FSB] and later a Russian dissident is a much better summary than was an ex-FSB lieutenant-colonel with KGB experience in fighting organized crime. Tom . In order for the article to have more impact it needs to be more concise. You restored back the intro' i.e. a major change and said I could make 'minor' changes if I wish but 'had to discuss drastic ones', I hope you realise this is hypocritical, given that you did a major revert without discussing. As you know, several people on the talk page have suggested to you that the intro was too long. I promise you, the shortened introduction looks and reads better than the longer one. The longer one does not summarise what he was in the first sentence including his dissidence, it goes straight into a narrative without any gap: ""After working in..."", it doesn't make sense in English,""his superiors had ordered for the assassination"" should be ""his superiors had ordered the assassination"". You can't be a dissident of an organisation, see dissident. It's got several long contiguous paragraphs instead of 4 short clearly defined ones. Anyway, hope you're okay, give us a shout and we can talk about it. It was that you said 'don't make drastic changes withou +" One-based numeration There's an interesting numeration called One-based numeration, which could be any numeral system that is counted from one, and it's usually compared to the widely used Zero-based numeration. This numeration defines the number ten as single digit, which is written as 0. But I don't think it's very efficient for arithmetic, what do you think about the numeration? 1-based binary: -01 -0 -1 X 1 0 01 00 011 010 001 000 0111 0110 0101 0100 0011 0010 0001 ... 1-based hexadecimal: -3 -2 -1 X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 0 21 22 23 24 .. 71 72 73 74 75 76 .. 4F7 4F8 1-based decimal: -3 -2 -1 X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 20 .. 07 08 09 00 211 212 .. 009 000 Ø-based decimal: -3 -2 -1 Ø 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1Ø 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2Ø .. 97 98 99 1ØØ 1Ø1 1Ø2 .. 999 1ØØØ Elementary arithmetic: 30 + 80 = 210 (0+0=20, ignored the carry) // Ø-based result is 110 20 + 31 = 51 (0+1=21, ignored the carry) // Ø-based result is 41 27 + 34 = 51 (7+4=21, ignored the carry) // Ø-based result is 41 26 + 34 = 40 (6+4=0, borrowed 1 due to no carry) // Ø-based result is 40 31 + 21 = 42 (1+1=2, borrowed 1 due to no carry) // Ø-based result is 32 1.5 + 1.5 = 1 (5+5=0, borrowed 1 due to no carry) // Ø-based result is 1 0 + 0.4 = 20.4 (0+4=24, ignored the carry) // Ø-based result is 19.4 Multiplication table: + 1-based decimal multiplication table x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 2 2 4 6 8 0 22 24 26 28 20 3 3 6 9 22 25 28 31 34 37 30 4 4 8 22 26 20 34 38 42 46 40 5 5 0 25 20 35 30 45 40 55 50 6 6 22 28 34 30 46 52 58 64 60 7 7 24 31 38 45 52 59 66 73 70 8 8 26 34 42 40 58 66 74 82 80 9 9 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 90 0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 For example, 353 x 8 = (3-1)00 x 8 + (5-1)0 x 8 + 3 x 8 = 2600 + 420 + 34 = 2020 + 34 = 2054 (Ø-based result is 1944) HTH & Thanks, iiy " +And I am not interested in your opinion on what was lost and what was won. You don't know what you're talking about as I was the defendent I think I know more about the case than you do. Unless of course yopu're just another Smith sock puppet. +, 25 November 2007 (UTC) One other thing That i just thought of, if the videos for the closed attractions are deleted, then none will have anything else to remember them by. Do you think it's okay to delete the videos for the closed attractions? 17:06 +Wash your dirty penis before giving shit Wash your fucking dirty penis before giving shits +Requested move 24 October 2014 :Song of Innocence (album) → – Moved without discussion by , warrants discussion first – This is a contested technical request (permalink). There's a single by the same artist +If I hack your account, I am going to poop on you! If I wikize this page, I am going to punch you in the face! +Sorry, I don't believe that +":I have removed ""The documentary the Price of Sugar has also led to a European boycott of the Dominican Republic. "" as this is in no way covered by the source. The source as quoted above says ""The documentary which depicts Dominican Republic as a country where Haitians are treated as slaves, urges Europeans to boycott its tourism and sugar"". This does not say that this urge has indeed lead to a boycott. So I would think that we would need a source here which states that there indeed is a European boycott of the Dominican Republic because of this film. As this is an overview article for the Dominican Republic it only should include such information if there is a wide impact of this film on the perception of the Dominican Republic of course referenced by reliable sources. The existence of the film itself does not proof that. " +POINTLESS SELF INDULGENT GARBAGE !!!!! +" Re: The Call of the Marching Bell I'm afraid that I've had to revert your edit. Frst, your change from Bang-i-dara"" ""Bang-e-Dara"" wasn't properly explained. The sources use a variety of transliterations; for example, the on-line translation uses ""BĀNG-E-DARĀ"" on the title page and ""Bāng-i-Darā"" in the text. Is there good reason to choose one over the other? Secondly, you seriously over-linked the article. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Overlinking and underlinking: what's the best ratio?: ""An article may be considered overlinked if any of the following is true: ""Low added-value items are linked without reason — such as, 1995, 1980s, and 20th century"" I've replaced some of the goods links that you added, and I've rewritten part of the article so that the problem of transliteration choice is dealt with. (Talk) Hi, while I appreciate your concern for maintianing the quality of the article, I consider your reverts rather abrupt. Except for the linking of years, you do not clearly justify why you reverted other edits: E.g. wikilinks to rationality, pragmatism, materialism, spirituality, and patriotism). Although you later re-linked England and Europe and repaired ""articles""! The reason for putting transliterations in Italics is to keep the reader aware of foreign language texts, which is a common practice In your edit summary, you blame me for unsourced changes. It is evident that I did not add any new texts for which I had to provide any ""source"" but if you insist on keeping any part of text, you should provide the relevant citation In your edit, you have linked the word Muslim with Islam which are two different articles. The use of i and e is problematic of transliterating Persian and Urdu texts respectively. But it is good practice to maintain the same standard in one article. The sound of ""e"" is common pronunciation in Urdu. And as the book predominantly contains Urdu poetry, I followed the same pronunciation pattern. Many thanks indeed for your messsage. My friendly advice would be to carefully see before any blatant reverts in future. cheers. Talk " +"03:09 (UTC) 20 Mar '08 Can you elaborate Squeak, in your add of the BLP, you wrote ""tag for BLP as this article has issues"". Can you elaborate specifically what some of those issues are (preferably without commentary in in a short, concise, bulleted list)? That way we can together address those concerns. I agree that, per the BLP page, this could fall under its purview to a small extent. My concern would be that someone in the future starts making sweeping changes (read: deletions) based on IDONTLIKEIT with the BLP as their smokescreen justification. I don't think that's your intent, but at some point it could happen from another. I'm hoping we all can mitigate that possibility now. Thanks in advance for clarifying. • • • " +I have put the lost info back on the page, nothing is lost now. I will try and look for any sources for the information. +This not your first case of personal attack loaded with emotions.Please stop. +To you whom are writing and editing that the azeri are a turkic people have absolutly no scientific or historic basis on this claim, please research on the subject and you will find out that a) they are desendents of the Medes in Persian Maadha, and they have been living in on the Iranian plateue since 1000-700 bc. b) their language have been changed into a turkic dialect in the 12 century AD, but this not change the fact that they are an Iranian people. your claims are deeply disturbind and have no historical basis, please stop rewriting history in this way, I am myself an azari, and I know my past, I have nothing against turkic people but we share the same language, not the same DNA or culture, we are Iranian! the fact that the Irish and Scotts speak english does not either make them english /an Azari +" Barnstar Civility Award To Postpostmod, for maintaining a civil tone in adversity. ¤ [Talk] All too often, I have seen minority-viewpoint editors become rude and aggressive when the consensus is clearly against them. Best wishes. ¤ [Talk] " +They sound Punk Metal so I've decided to add that to the genres. +News This place has had some new houses builtI know this place i saw it on the map went there did a few stuff. with the staff.—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 21:59, 5 June 2008 +fuck you. you cant block me. i change mi ip every 5 sec. +" reflist reduces the size of fonts, and should only be used when necessary. Per WP:CITE and previous discussions, the normal references tag should be used for references when you have less than 10 or if you have more than 10 but they are not well formatted. Two columns should only be used for 20+ well-formatted references. 3 or more should never be used because of issues with it.  (talk · contribs) " +History of Wahabis is full of bloodbath.The massacre of Taif must be included.I support it. +"==:MLB RUMORS== A tag has been placed on MLB RUMORS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TALK|HISTORY " +":The strip Mohammed crashed on was a difficult strip to land on as it ran up a hill and was only about a thousand yards in length. According to an investigation the plane was hit by a strong cross wind as it approached the landing strip, and the plane stalled when the American former fighter pilot (Jim Harrington) tried to pull out of the landing by ascending at full power. Jim knew the strip was dangerous. He was told by Mohammed's first pilot (Gerald Auerbach) that he should refuse to land on the strip, and that he should ask for a safer strip to be built in the area. Jim refused to listen, saying ""Oh I can do it, I can do it."" Obviously in the circumstances encountered he could not. " +" Comment I think it would be best for all involved to give Missionary/Retcon (I will use Retcon because it is the oldest of the accounts) a chance to redeem himself, and for all parties to terminate the inquisition against him. Using a sockpuppet or changing to a different account to escape unwanted criticism is permitted at Wikipedia. If his actions had been limited to that, I would not have responded to Tommstein's request at all as an ill-founded request. However, what led me to respond were two factors: one, that Retcon had fraudulently attempted to mislead people into believing he and Missionary were different people, and two, that he created at least one impersonation account, impersonating a person who he was clearly at odds with. In any case, Retcon has acknowledged and apologized for his inappropriate acts; Wikipedia's ""assume good faith"" policy all but requires to accept his apology and move on. So let's please do so. I'd especially call on and to lay off the rhetoric; it will not help defuse the situation. Personal attacks (such as calling Retcon a ""compulsive liar"") are neither helpful nor welcomed. There is bad blood on both sides of this issue, and frankly I'd like to see y'all work this out on your own with civility, rather than escalating the situation to the point that intervention by the Arbitration Committee is required. " +This article did not seem to exist yet near as I could tell although it had multiple red links (over 20!). Since I am a railfan, and since I lived in the area for 10 years, it seemed fitting. I fetched an image from the Library of Congress to use for it. Should I have cropped that image to remove the HAER indexing and so forth??? Comments are very welcome, I am only an egg at article creation. ++ +Roger's page will indeed be added to Metapedia without all the vandalism, lies and distortion that have been posted here. +" Straight until proven gay No evidence he was gay so removed it. Especially bad was the article's citation of the New York Times obituary as ""proof"" of his sexual preference. Click on it and read it. It's still there for the other references. It says he left no immediate survivors, nothing else about his personal life. Lots of old people die without immediate survivors." +Good intentions Hi Yan, I fail to see the good intentions of your friend Jayjg coming into play in Talk:Beta Israel. Plenty of editors have expressed their opinion that the relevant section should either be removed or entirely rewritten. By your advice I've suggested to bring the endless debate to a fruitful conclusion by rewriting it myself. I thought there was an agreement on that at his talk page. Now your friend sets me deadlines I did not agree to and pretends he doesn't see the other editors who disagree with him. I would appreciate it if you could step in to end this childish behaviour. We're here to write articles, not to win arguments, neither by head counts nor with lies. Thanks, +Get a fucking life mate or a job! You're Australian for crying out loud. Is there nothing you can do but sit around on a computer and edit? You're wasting your time on this page. The only reason why I'm replying to you is because it's funny how you try to start something but you can't. I don't care about your college education. The least you can do to me is reply in BIG WORDS. Do yourself a favor and jerk off. +knock it off with the constant duplication info at the 14th street eighth avenue article +" R.P. Williams How does one mark a reference as questionable. While I was able to find a blog mention of the ""feat"" of him running 9.0 , the person writing the blog was unnamed and gave reference to an out of print book ""The Super Athletes"" by David Willoughby, which I later tracked to being published in 1970. Further that: another reference to the book, commented on by Garry Hill, noted editor of Track and Field News responds ""Willoughby's book, while a fascinating read about feats of strength, is, to say the least, largely the work of a guy given to wild flights of fantasy in comparing people across the ages. Very little science involved. Take it with many huge grains of salt."" Later in the same blog, he cites the unbelievability of this one mark as substance for such a statement. I have not stepped out on a limb to delete the item entirely, but certainly more documentation, beyond even Willoughby to his original sources sounds appropriate here. " +" Removing is probably fine. As for the , this is used in and would break the only method for adding a reference to the coordinates, so I would leave it. With regards to the loading times, I didn't think it was any worse than anything else. It could be due to the recent slowness with the servers. ―Œ(talk) " +" This is what my post said ""I find the first paragraph of the article to be rather strange. It gives the controversial definitions (one coming from a RSS mouthpiece, and another coming from some Greek literature) upfront. The more commonly used and most logical definition (a follower of Hinduism), is provided at the end. In a neutral, ""disinterested tone"" article, the controversial parts should not be provided so much prominence. If anything, they should be included in the ""disputes"" section, no ?"" It is hard to fathom how this gave you the sense that I am ""trying to make this a battleground between Hindus and Sikhs."" I did not even mention the word Sikh there. and I have been discussing this subsequently in a healthy manner, it is only you who got some ""war path"" impression. Disappointed. " +Clint Walker is indeed not the oldest surviving actor in a leading/starring role from a golden age tv western. That title belongs to Robert Horton (now aged 91), of Wagon Train fame. Good call to remove my edit! +Shows without an air date There seems to be some disagreement in whether we should include shows without a confirmed air date on the list or not. I think the general agreement is that we shouldn't include it on the same list. There are some ideas of seperating future shows in a section titled 'Shows Without A Confirmed Air Date' or something to that effect. I kind of agree with that idea, because it's not like they are just rumors. Anyway, let's discuss this a little so we can get everyone's input, without making any changes yet. So if you have a view on this subject, please discuss it here, instead of having an edit war. Thanks / talk / contribs +" Speedy deletion of Dirtycoke A tag has been placed on Dirtycoke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (Talk,Contribs) " +In addition Toddst1 is an editor engaged in an active dispute with me and so by Wikipedia policy cannot place a block AND using in IP address (your own), even if it had not been a software error (as it was) in not using a sockpuppet. The IP address is the same one used for aimulti. Also the claim I tagged Toddst1 as a 'one issue editor' is FALSE. I tagged three people, one who voted for me and two who voted against me. I had no need to pretend the tags came from another party. What purpose would that serve? +Plot summary This plot summary has a longstanding consensus that dates back two years. Occasionally it is tweaked, but it doesn't need a makeover. I find the proposed changes almost uniformly inferior. The only thing that can be said for them is that the section is shorter, but many editors over the last two years have agreed that this is about as spare as we want to make it. At one time, this summary was about 900 words, and as a summary of the action is was better. So the judgement of the editors has been that this is about right. +born 31march 1995 Yes +" Hello, , and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.Please understand that Wikipedia cannot accept original research in its articles. Happy editing! Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility P.S. See WP:NOR for an explanation of the policy on original research. " +, 5 October 2012 (UTC) I first sent you message, then after that created a section regarding my edit in the Talk page and deleted the content once again, after which I continued to receive warnings and reinstatements of the removed content, at which point I decided to escalate the conversation to the specific user's Talk page. If there is any issue related to the timestamp of the section I created in the article's talk page, I edited the post with the signature button at a later time because I had forgotten to when I initially created the section. I wasn't intending to create any edit-wars and my direct assertion to another user was only because my edit and talk-page section were being overlooked. 71.94.7.228 23:57 +Dear Judy I’M 15 and I must be wrong in the head. For the past two years I have been lying to my nearest and dearest. They all think I had a boyfriend and that I lost my virginity to him. I also told them I did drugs. The problem is that it is a load of rubbish. I have a new boyfriend. We are getting serious and he thinks I have had sex. The thing is, I never had. I have even lied to my best friends. Because of what I have said to people, I have been branded a slag. I want to get rid of that. I have changed. I don’t drink but I do a few drugs. People have changed towards me. That’s good but I want people to know the truth, yet I know they will hate me. My friend told the truth about herself and everyone turned against her. What should I do? +Its a good thing to masterbate +" 542nd Parachute Infantry Regiment (United States) Article Ian Rose, Article: 542nd Parachute Infantry Regiment (United States) I feel that this article needs a picture and a Military Unit Infobox. I am able to do the Infobox without the picture and the number of people who were in the unit during World War II. It could possibly improve the article greatly but I am concerned about the ""orphan"" tag (from 2009) at the time. To me there is enough links in the article to remove it. I'll also send this message to " +"Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. ''''''|(talk) " +If this means I will not see the accuser and his copins for two weeks I am very grateful to you for this block... +It was a CROP poll. I doubt the CUC changed the data in reproducing them. It was widely reported in the press, and I don't recall seeing any criticism of the methodology. +" Jonthan, please stop being uncilvil. Saying things like: ""And surf the web man! It's all over!"" is the kind of stuff that will get you uncivil reports. Also, stuff like ""Bla he hooohe ha ha ha"" is also the kind of stuff that gets anoying and it is very childesh. " +Wikipedium Hey Tom, although I agree with your criticisms of Wikipedia, I think it would be unfortunate if you abandoned it to start yet another fork project. As a long-time editor of Wikipedia, I would like to stress that the key to not going crazy here is patience and thick skin. Instead of trying to reinvent Wikipedia, I would encourage you to try changing Wikipedia one small step at a time. It isn't easy, but the results can be very significant. I've had 101 policy and project ideas shot down, but I've also had a small handful that have been successful, and hopefully those small successes have made Wikipedia a better place. By the way, if you really are sick of Wikipedia, you may want to take a look at Veropedia. It's not perfect, but it has some good points (and most of the editors and admins are Wikipedia alum). Anyway, good luck with whatever you decide to do! +Wondering What would the bot do if it came across a talk page with Category:Start-Class Chicago articles Category:Low-importance Chicago articles What about if it came across +" Again, this section isn't about the repression of ID, it's about the portrayal of the scientific enterprise. ""Expelled caricatures scientists and the scientific enterprise as dogmatically committed to atheism"". That's one of the statements around which the section under question is constructed. The section isn't about the rejection of ID. Statements about the rejection of ID have no bearing on the title of this section. " +JW Pages Please stop your personal insults. If you cannot work cooperatively, then you do not belong here. +Jozef Tiso lead Since I have not received a response from you on my earlier question, I will repeat it. Where do we stand on the issue of only referring to Tiso as a fascist in the lead? Are you still insisting on this point? I look forward to your reply. +(besides one, and quoted why it distorts other peoples' culture) +" Now it has ""Quick facts"" sections, so you know its worthy of an encyclopedia. Well, Andreas can't demand only one reviewer so that his work is simpler; that's not in the encyclopedia's best interests is it? His idea that I don't review his article—even when I just made one minor, and entirely justified point anyway—smacks of WP:OWN too. I don't see why you should feel down, either way. Changing the topic: what's Bionic Test? " +Hi - I can't find the 'unblock|your reason here' bit for an appeal, but the issue is somewhat moot as 48hrs have passed. I would accept in any case that my sense of humour overcame me with regard to the suggestion that BarretaGun turned his shotgun around 180 degrees. However, in view of recent events with regard to Clegg/Baretta/Parnathus‎/IPedits/Daunt/Whatever perhaps you'd reconsider the Sinden article ban after reviewing my edits on that and other Sinden-related articles. Without exception, those edits sought to improve the article by removing puffery and unsupported false claims. Plus of course there's now a lot of clean-up work to do here: [] Good catch on checkuser - I'd considered such a request but thought there was *far* more flushing out to do. I thought Clegg was too smart to get caught twice, so would have used a better method to mask his IP. I was surprised that Daunt was the same as Parnathus‎; I thought Daunt was 'a source very close to Jonathan King', and that Parnathus was a 'throwaway account' used by Clegg while he was at an internet cafe or something, as that entity came in strong right from the start with agressive tactics and personal abuse and was bound to get blocked at some point. +REDIRECT Talk:Burn It Down (band) +work as a gay stripper in the Chodes for all center, as most of you have seen me there. I'm not sure how big my dick is, its probably pretty small, but I +" well its not ""Vanderlism"" as you state it. You still should allow the other part of my edit that you keep reverting because you hate the genre so much. 75.139.103.133 " +'NOW YOU'RE HELL TO GET AWAY! I SEE YOU!' +"::Regarding Silver's ""timber leg,"" Silver specifically says that he learned his craft as a sailor while in the navy. In fact, he specifically mentions that he was a ""master mariner,"" which indicates he was an officer on a warship (yes, the pirate could have been lying regarding his former rank) and that he lost his leg in battle, which would doubtlessly lead to his retirement from active naval service. However, with the skills of a former naval officer (incidentally, who would have been trained in navigation) he would have had an easy time joining up with a pirate crew. (He was likely lying about serving under Captain England given the dates.) Also, Silver was Flint's quartermaster, which in the Royal Navy is the helmsman's position. Given that his one-legged status does not seem to make him any less lethal a pirate he takes down a man by nailing him in the spine with his crutch! there is no reason to suppose that he retired from the life of a gentleman of fortune because he had one leg. He retired because Flint died. " +" Regarding Yours and SatuSoro's Criticisms Just wanted to speak with you on the whole Indonesian Civil War controversy. I'd just like to say: I'd be fine with a change in title. My chief concern is that the title be accurate and keeps to NPOV but does not gloss over the facts in the process. So long as a new title does not violate that, I'm not going to dig in my heels. I bring this up because SatuSoro has accused me of being too possessive of this article and Suharto. I just wanted to clarify that while I state my opinions in forceful way and report frequently on what I do, I don't do that to ""take possession"" of an article over other editors; I do it to stay accountable and above-board. " +" Being back Thanks for noticing and your warm words earlier. Have yet to get back into the swing of things, but I'm glad to see so many of my old friends are still here. Happy editing. talk " +FUCK YOUR MOTHER FUCK OFF +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Cool (aesthetic), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. (talk) +AfD nomination of Mike Burnett I have nominated Mike Burnett, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Burnett. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. +" Glad you like it! You should've seen the poor userpage before I toned down the pink. Check sometime, I've hidden a bunch of goodies in there for people to take if they'd like. Maybe they'll learn how it all works. Maybe I'll learn how it all works too! Ya never know. ) ~Kylu (|t) " +" Works for me. On a side note, modern perceptions of where Asia ends and Europe begins, or how the ""Middle East"" is defined always gives me a headache. The Scythian " +I'm fine with this compromise. +Review summary The article still retains issues within it that currently keep it from reaching GA status. For an album that peaked at number 14 on the Billboard 200 for and subsequently appeared on the charts for an additional 75 weeks, the article is not broad in it's coverage. The prose is lacking throughout and Billboard should only needs referred to once in the subsections where it mentioned. To only have three reviews is not proportional to the number of reviews that are not included. I have no idea when and what other countries the album was released in. There is not even one interview! The references are not up to par and over-linking remains. (meow) +OH, GET REAL, WILL YA'!! (or, is THAT a totally alien-concept for you??)... These are not 'angry' - you DO NOT want to see me angry... AGAIN, THESE ARE ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT, WHICH FALLS [SOLIDLY] WITHIN MY 1ST AMMENDMENT RIGHTS. Additionally, I DO HAVE MY OWN WEBSITES - SEVERAL OF THEM - AND THERE ARE OTHERS ABOUT ME BUILT BY FANS I'VE NEVER EVEN PHYSICALLY MET... Once more the mark of someone 'wet behind their ears' and not willing to do the research... I GUESS everything that is required of a 'good' editor/administrator, HERE. I've had this same problem with the 'Wiki' bastards in Australia... Spouting revisionist history, and trying to tell ME that I never did the things that I actually did, and pronouncing 'harsh-judgment'/condemnation on the things I DIDN'T... What the hell is the matter with you 'types'? (rhetorical, actually)... Because I already know: You hide behind 'avatars' and sit on your 'high-and-mighty-thrones' to try and dictate to other people about THEIR OWN LIVES... Politically, you're VERY likely LIBERAL, and ethically/morally, quite obviously BANKRUPT! In short, individuals of your 'persuasion' cannot make it in the outside world, so you 'bury' & 'busy' yourselves in 'safe' [for you] places like this, where you can exert an imagined 'power' over others and their lives, through KEYSTROKE TERROISM - THAT'S WHAT IT AMOUNTS-TO... I'M NOT THE DANGER/THREAT WITH THESE MESSAGES, BECAUSE I'M OUT HERE AND PUBLIC... BUT YOU ARE, BECAUSE YOU CAN HIDE BEHIND ALL OF THIS, SO YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE PROTECTED, AND CAN STRIKE OUT AT PEOPLE WITH 'IMPUNITY'... BUT, YOU REALLY CANNOT. I FEEL SAD FOR YOU... YEAH, RIGHT!! Well, I'm going to be the 'bigger man' here (even though I believe it said YOU were some kinda' editor CHICK)... I'll leave you to do what you want in your own, lil' limited SANDBOX, and I'll just go about my usual business - IN THE OUTSIDE WORLD; THE REAL WORLD! - where what is accomplished really matters, is truly appreciated, and people actually give a good, god-damn about accuracy and the true efficacy of all their hard-fought-for efforts. I wish you well... I'd wish your 'husband' well, also, although I doubt that you have one... for the above, obvious reasons cited - and IF ya' ever did [ya' sweet, lil' monkey you], he likely 'BOLTED' long ago... either that, or ya' probably 'edited' his ass out of existence TOO! Poor Guy... Oh well... Ciao, baby. -30- +userbox I made a small edit to one of your es. (Please acknowledge this comment by removing it.) Thanks. +" What gives you the right? Just a question, I thought we weren't supposed to delete entries from our talk page. Just because some other cyber-censor things it's ok to, does not give you the right to do it. You should hold yourself to a higher wikimoral-standard because you are in a wikiposition of wikipower. My words were not meant to be annoying. There is an error on your user page. You state you have been vandalized twice, but in reality it has been more than that. I am simply wondering why you are being dishonest. You shouldn't just jump to conclusions because you have some sort of bizarre internet power. This isn't a flame, or a troll, it's my POV, and you're not supposed to delete it off of your user page just because you don't like it. Remember ""staying_cool"". Read below and please ensure you understand it prior to commenting further. In working on Wikipedia, you may occasionally get into a dispute with another person. That person may seem like a troll or a hothead to you, but it's usually best to assume that you are dealing with a reasonable person who is simply confused on a particular issue or has a POV different from your own. No matter what the problem is, flaming is not going to solve it. Try to reach a truce." +An example of fait accompli and WP:JDL. This definition is not used of biographies of Muslim people. Not any concrete exmp for müslim, christian or jews people..You should stop practicing the policy by oneself and commanding role. The existence of the source, this definition and funny redirect does not require. +" Controversial Remarks Alleged Calling Facebook Users ""Dumb F**ks"" sources for the below mentioned contribution: http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/02/01/is-zuckerbergs-the-hacker-way-letter-facebooks-dont-be-evil-and-will-it-live-up-to-it/ http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-users-dumb-fucks http://au.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/ http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/14625/are-users-%E2%80%98dumb-fucks%E2%80%99-trusting-data-facebook http://tdh.me/zuckerberg-called-early-facebook-users-dumb-fucks-so-what/ http://anphicle.com/en/they-trust-me-dumb-fucks-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg/ http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Facebook-Mark-Zuckerberg-Social-Networking-privacy-security,news-6794.html http://au.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zuckerberg-ims-confirmed-by-zuckerberg-the-new-yorker-2010-9 Other sections on Wikipedia where Controversial Remarks is valid: Bryant Gumbel (section Controversial remarks) Mel Gibson (section Controversial remarks) Sherrod Brown (section Controversial remarks) Kent Hovind (section Controversial remarks) Venkaiah Naidu (section Controversial Remarks) Greg Gutfeld (section Controversial remarks) Lawrence Cannon (section Controversial remarks) Daniel Bernard (diplomat) (section Controversial remark) James R. Flynn (section Controversial remarks) and many many more start. While at Harvard College 19-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg allegedly used login data from his social network to hack into fellow students email accounts; that evidence also included instant message transcripts where he calls facebook users ""dumb fucks"". The alleged following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room: Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard Zuck: Just ask. Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one? Zuck: People just submitted it. Zuck: I don't know why. Zuck: They ""trust me"" Zuck: Dumb fucks. In another instant message (IM) FRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites? ZUCK: yea i’m going to fuck them ZUCK: probably in the year ZUCK: *ear end." +" Copyright violation The ""Coding"" section of this page was largely copied and pasted from http://www.pmhut.com/wbs-examples. Seems to be a pretty clear violation of the copyright asserted by that page ( © 2007-2011 PM Hut - an itoctopus project ) It is not OK to copy-paste from a non-free source even if we change the text a little bit ( Wikipedia:Copy-paste#Can I copy-paste if I change the text a little bit? ) 164.58.104.33 " +Hi Friend! Will you be my wikipedia mentor? +" You wrote: ""Everything I have done lately has been sources from reputable text books."" A quote taken out of historical context and placed into some illogical place may significantly distort the truth. An example is your sentence ""It was not until the 1950s that Soviet farm animals approached their 1928 levels"" In your text one may conclude that it was all fault of collectivization. Because your omitted the catastrophe of 1941-1945, which threw the economy of the country into middle ages. In addition there was a severe drought in 1946, which hit about 50% of the arable land. And in fact it was miracle (actually very hard labor) that industry and agriculture was recovered in mere 5-7 years. " +Andrew Breitbart== Came up with the idea of the website and created it. No mention of him on this page. His own Wikipedia page gives him some credit, but nothing here. What's the deal? == +We're no strangers to love, you know the rules and so do I. +There is only one way to settle this dilemma, we vote for the color of the infobox, Oakland Athletics or New York Yankees. Having A's colors on Reggie Jackson's page is the most worst thing ever. Everyone remembers Reggie as a Yankee, the three homeruns in the world series, the argument with Billy Martin, etc. Reggie had his greatest success as a Yankee. And lets face it nobody likes the Oakland A's #9 Reggie Jackson but everbody loves the New York Yankees #44 Reggie Jackson. Reggie will be the first to tell you that he is a Yankee. +hi guy what is your faverout band +Cool beans. Thanks. As far as her scenes being cut, it doesn't seem so. My theoryjust a theoryis that she was hired to do the voice-over for the actress, who was a New Zealand native with a heavy accent, probably for the US market, maybe other markets as well. It's not uncommon. The character of Stephanie in LazyTown, played and voiced in the US by Julianna Rose Mauriello is voiced by different actresses for different countries. +" Is this your example of Neutrality? Heads Up [Header, new topic] User Borealdreams asked me for help here. He is now experiencing WP:BOOMERANG. One question; may I assume that your ""my client"" comment was one of your typical edit summaries and not an indication of a COI? That's what it sounded like to me. Guy Macon (talk) The client is installing OPGW for their own purposes, I have nothing to do with the selection of the materials - but presumably the client knows what it's doing when it picked OPGW. Mere facts will not sway a Wikieditor. Besides, I'm well known for being in the pay of the Twisty Bulb Cartel. Wtshymanski (talk) If it comes up, I will be happy to attest to the fact that I have never seen any hint of COI in your edits. I have other disagreements with you, but there is no need to repeat them here. I just saw a comment on my talk page that makes me think that there is some COI editing going on. Borealdreams wrote ""If the 'flat earth' mentality was removed, I wouldn't even need to mention my products directly by name"". I am going to take this to COIN - probably tomorrow, I am a bit busy today. BTW, Re: ""why does a talk page for a subpage in user space even exist?"", I am pretty sure that you can redirect all of those talk pages to your main talk page. See you at the next Super Secret Twisty Bulb Cartel Meeting? Guy Macon (talk) " +REDIRECT Talk:In re TRENDnet, Inc. +Fantastic! Give me a block and blantantly ignore the behaviours of the others. So, it's controversal to state why i'm so irate, but yet it's within guidelines to: Insult my intelligence Degrade my character and overall tell me to fuck off? Wow. 4:21 15 January 2012 (UTC) +, nor does he mind the fact that it was an attempt to reduce harm +" Producer Somebody changed this edit I made when I added Meegan O'Hara as a producer. I have two sources (so far) that state Meegan O'Hara is producer, here and here the second one is a little blurry. I picture is an absolute reliable source a because it is official. Jack In " +Stardust How come no mention of his role in the film Stardust? It was hilarious! Very different then any role I've seen Deniro in and he played the part so well. +Let me show you: 2 days ago the Executive Director of the State Bar admitted that the State Bar was involved in acts of serious public corruption and it was covered by most major news outlets ( https://www.google.com/#tbm=nws&q;=state+bar+california+dunn ). Who better than to expose the corruption than the executive director of the Bar itself? It's the Bar who has admitted this. Knowing this information benefits you and is well-within Wikipedia's rules (it's already been added to other Encyclopedia's and Legal Journals). Ask yourself why these accounts below keep deleting this information without the required discussion. Habitual Vandalizing of State Bar Article and Violations of 3 Revert Rule: +" French Academy Hi Espoo. I got your link after the RM discussion had already been closed as a ""no consensus"". I can see why you find it frustrating. The guideline says that, if an English language name is in common use, then we should use it. I'm mildly surprised to see that ""French Academy"" is used as widely as your sources show it to be - personally, I've only ever heard it called The Academie Francaise (with or without diacritics), and I grew up in Texas! Nevertheless my personal anecdotal experience means nothing when it comes to making decisions for the encyclopedia. It does seem to be the case that most people in that discussion were willing to discount Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) in this case. Why not bring it up there, on the guideline talk page? I'll bet that's a good place to find people who care about that guideline, as well as people who've dealt with similar controversial cases in the past. I've added the guideline to my watchlist; I'll keep an eye out for what kind of response you get there. If Académie française is to be an exception to the Use English guideline, then I think it should be explained why it is, and how to recognize such exceptions in the future. - " +MY RESPONSE: 1. First of all, this publication is a Native American publication. Thus among Native American, it is INDEED notable. It IS THE ONLY PUBLICATION OF ITS KIND. GEE, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS HAS WRITTEN ABOUT IT a few times. If that does not make it notable, I don;t know what does. 2. Just because this is not a a mainstream publication does not mean WE SHOULD BE discounted or our voices, not heard. This is not fair and is only another example of minorities being silence in the media +I explained to you but you got it deleted! +You are 22 years older than your husband! You are an old cougar! You are an old cougar! You are an old cougar! +Ah ok, I actually reverted it because there was nothing in the edit summary to state why it was removed. I have no idea though why Huggle went straight to a final warning though, give me a sec I'll remove that from your page ) +You need to find sources that state what you are claiming. waits for audience applause, not a sausage +Even emptier talk has been +, 12 April 2013 (UTC) If you think that it is relevant, then you need sources that directly demonstrate its relevancy.WP:OR 198.151.130.66 04:02 +"ee I agree, but there are enough editors think there is enough evidence to include it here. I truly believe that we need an exclusion clause along the lines of ""If only an idiot would believe it, then it doesn't belong"", but I guess I'll be waiting a while. " +this article has significant tone issues This article is nice to have, but is currently written like fancruft the tone, particularly fiction is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. +" Everything here needs a reliable source, and you have yet to supply one; it has nothing to do with ""my beliefs"".wordsdeeds " +k thank you but try to put some his new pics of mohombi tcz +County or not county ? The below former counties of South Pyongan were merged with Nampo in 2004 and are administered as part of that city: Chollima-guyok (천리마군/千里馬郡) Kangso-guyok (강서군/江西郡) Ryonggang County (룡강군/龍岡郡) Taean-guyok-gun (대안군/大安郡) This looks weird. Each former county was formerly named 군. When merged wit Nampo, some were renamed 구역. The parenthetical Hangul names are the former names (why not, this can be an editorial choice). But the Roman names should be either all new or all former. We should have either Ryonggang-gun or Ryonggang-guyok (according to the actual name). And either Taean-guyok or Taean-gun. But what could be a guyok-gun ? +" Rugby vs. ""rugby league""? What's the difference? The article should clarify. " +":::::: It is as if he is going on the 9/11 page and writing that there was no evidence that Osama Bin Laden was responsible, other than what CNN says and the Russians and Iranians say that the Israelis were responsible. He is going on other pages, now Death of Neda Agha-Soltan and is making such comments. my point is that he is not out to make a consensus. He is using these pages to propagate ""Russian Media Sources"". He is trying to debate whether or not the Protests are CIA planned and Neda's death a Conspiracy. He shouldnt be editing articles. Ive nearly had it cause Ive had to babysit this guy for the past 2 weeks. And no administrator is taking a look at what he is doing as Vandalism, they are viewing it as Content Dispute. His edits are, at the very least, disruptive. I have tried talking to this guy and he is just debating with me as to whether im not a Pro-Shah and Pro-American corporate-s***. You call this content dispute? Again, im sorry, but ive had it with this guy. He has his own standard that BBC, CNN and Fox are lies and that Iranian/Russian Media is truth. His edits are disruptive, I have done all i can, and i would greatly appreciate it if an Administrator could do something about this guy. " +Just To Talk I read your user page, you know what I'm just like you! I find that the most Talk pages with controversial topics are the most intersting. +on other users pages rather then coming to me directly with a problem they may have about me +Picture I don't know the source of it. I took it from a webpage years ago in the belief that it was an old image, but I now have a suspicion that it may be a quite recent painting. +" Re:FeloniousMonk ""I prefer rationalism to atheism... you don't have to waste your time in either attacking or defending"" (Isaac Asimov) ""Clearly he viewed Atheism as merely a default position"" (FeloniousMonk) ""say what?"" ( [Spade]) In summary, no, partisan atheists can't define atheism here. Please review NPOV, and some neutral references , , . religioustolerance.org? About.com? You might as well ask me to go to infidels.org. This is an Encyclopedia, not some sort of propoganda production line. Neutrality and factual acuracy are the fundamentals here, not partisanship. [Spade] 21:53, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)" +Your unconstructive edits are beginning to be a real drag on Wikipedia. Please stop. +" 2015 (UTC) First a suggestion for Sarah Welsh, if you are ""struggling"", and that too with the very first words of the article , just hold off rather than going ahead and still editing the article (and making it, as you did in this case, almost impossible for anyone to comprehend). This is not someone's personal blog, but a page with more than 2000 daily views. So please act with discretion. Second, your allegation that my edits ""distorted and misrepresented the sources such as Nesbitt's OUP book"" is a complete LIE. I did not even bring in the Nesbitt book. So, again, as has been found out on many prior occasions, don't mislead people and please show some civility. Rather, it is you who removed reliably sourced content that did not comply with your own biased views, while you were on your massive blind spree to undo all my edits. For instance, I had quoted directly from Mansukhani, Introduction to Sikhism, that I had referenced when mentioning word of God ""The Granth presides over all congregations and represents the word of God in permanent form"", which you blindly removed. Coming now to the sentence in the first paragraph on the key beliefs, I had made an edit a few days ago. You again made modifications to them. I suggest you actually go and read the sources well. In any case, I have added another source, and all the beliefs I have included are now present in the three cited sources. Now of course, to make complete sentences and for improved readability, I have to add some of my own words. (e.g., key beliefs are ""engaging in"" selfless service, ""striving for"" social justice; rather than selfless service, social justice.) I urge you to exercise extreme restraint and caution from here on, rather than engaging in uncivilized behavior and/or edit-warring. 07:22, 10 October" +", 9 August 2011 (UTC) Yeah, I love that opening ""so high, you and me go on, in the sky"" ) • Talk2Me 23:20" +Well it means anyone can wirte his own islamic perspective on Islam article. It means I am wasting my time making contributions on this cheap set. Is there any muslim administrator in wikipedia . If there is can i get his username. +That's some nice use of online translators Jingiby. +I wrote The Article Hello, all! I wrote the aricle and it was not intedned to sound like a commercial or anything of the sort. I wrote it just to promo an event I had a particular intrest in and saw that no one else has wrote anything on tit, so I took it upon myself and did it. I will be happy if it goes May 31th. AS LONG AS IT STAYS AROUND FOR THE EVENT! It does not have to be on Wikipedia forever, as I did not expect that. Thanks MikeyCMS +WHO CARES.... GOETHEAN IS A capuchin monkeys anyway +if I promise to stop spamming any more +Pamela Anderson Joy Stovall, I want to entertain you (double meaning) !!! Pamela +" Yes, that's probably the best way to view the development of that article. However, I can't go into that much detail myself because I certainly don't have the time to do that much research. That quote from Iliad is rather odd. Homer seems to be refering to Hesiod's earlier Theogony; but the details are different. The Perseus Digital Library (whose pages take some time to load; so for anybody reading this, be patient) translates Homer's quote just as you say (line 14 onwards), and has this to say for Theogony (line 720 onwards). I'm no classicist, but I'd be weary of that bit of text - it is certinly odd and probably should not be taken at face value so naïvely. As you say, everywhere else (as far as I know) he refers to the underworld as the ""domain of hades"". As for Erebus, the quotes from Iliad (under the heading: 3 from Homer, Iliad), at face value, seem to indicate that it is a place. But this is merely a misunderstanding of what Erebus is. Erebus is the gloom, the darkness of the underworld, the ""place of dark mists"" as you put it. Replace ""Erebus"" with ""darkness of the underworld"" or the like and the quotes make just as much sense as the assumption that Erebus is a physical location. However, I don't know of any source that explicitly states that it is a location in the underworld; so, again, where does that quote come from? " +" You are clearly off the topic, this is about a terror attack and not about whitewashing it. You start with ""I don't normally get involved in these Arab/Israeli pages"", well that's hard to believe. So maybe propose a new topic ""King David Hotel bombing excuses under western political correct history judgement"" There is another piece of unacceptable whitewashing in the text: ""However, the bombing operation had already been planned before then."" That means there isn't even any sort of link between the bombing and the British raids, which were btw. legitimate action that any police force would have done. This is a piece of excuse and justification not tolerated in any topic accusing the Arab side. Finally, there is so much about the buzzword ""terrorism"", placing it above all suffering caused to the Palastinians by expulsion and regular warfare, but yet apparently the same people who expose this so much don't distance themselves from this bombing terror but only seek to excuse it as much as possible." +"==When alleles clash==== This is the model for editing a reverse orientation A->T T->A C->G G->C ""rs3819001"",""1"",""1128776"",""TT"" -My result- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=3819001 http://mutdb.org/cgi-bin/mutdb.pl?snp=rs3819001&variant;=291487&rsid;=NM_004195 Wild type nucleotide:TABATABTAB Variant nucleotide:TABGTAB Chromosome strand orientation:TABreverse Given the above, the TT represents the A or ""Wild type."" Am I correct in this assumption? John Lloyd Scharf ==" +I guess its your modus operandi is to knock over sand castles because you think they're ugly instead of helping the builder make it better by giving him tools and making suggestions. What are you hoping to accomplish by this? To prove you're right? To get an apology? To get me blocked? I doubt any of these will happen and in the end it just proves how uncivil you are. +law vs conscience The Law has no authority over anyone because the law is a thing. A thing has no power, no rights and no authority. It can’t speak, hear or feel. The Law was instituted by those that are powerful and wealthy as a form of their own protection. They that formed the Law have also designed loopholes so that they may escape the penalty of that Law. They are the Lawless ones. The knowledge of Good and Evil produces a conscience in us. By having a conscience we all feel guilt. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil produced a conscience in us. If you look at the story of Adam and Eve you will notice as soon as they ate off the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that they became ashamed, worried, confused and guilty. When the Lord said, “If you eat of this tree you shall die,” You will die because of your guilt. Before that event took place we had no conscience much like unreasoning animals, no guilt. Look at the animals, they just exist not knowing good and evil. Before long humans started forming a legal system from this knowledge. This legal system is still forced on us today. It is known as government or civilizations. We belong to a civilized world. We must reject it. To gain access to the Tree of life we must eliminate the standard that we have created civilization with. The Law. The Law forces us to be guilty. It takes away peace in the world. The knowledge of good and evil and the fruit of it which is the Law, is standing in the way of the Tree of Life. It is an abominable thing. Our conscience must rule over us not the Law. +Re: I am gay I was wondering if there are pictures of gay people in Wikipedia for my bedroom 76.67.105.188 +Strong support. If anything one can make the point that Mary Miller (actress) is the primary use. Just because some one writes books and they are used as sources in articles is not a good way to determine primary use. I'd argue that the 59 references used to write the Mary Miller (actress) implies a much more notable person and better makes the case then another article that is based on only a single reference. I think that adding Mary Millar in the list of statistics confuses many since it is just a similar spelling and that would be better handled as a See also on the dab page. Obviously this means that the current page needs to be disambiguated to Mary Miller (art historian) to allow the dab page to be moved. Using the statistics provided in opposition to this proposal clearly shows that, if anything, the current article does not even receive a majority of the hits. So while that is not a good way of proving primary use, in this case it makes a strong case that there is no obvious primary use so the dab page should be moved. Looking at the numbers in a less biased way you see: Mary Miller (disambiguation) 0 (newly created) Mary Miller (actress) 275 Mary Miller 679 Mary Millicent Miller 567 (newly created) Mary Miller Glasscock 32 (newly created) +Suggest keeping this at ANI, because I'm getting confused. -) - +heh, no problem, I thought after posting you this you were probably just patroling the recent changes and so wouldnt have relised, thanks, best wishes Tally-ho! +Yep, like I said. It is sad and proably not going to change anytime soon, but hopefully one day people would see just how degeratorey it is to call all blacks and only blacks AA. One small step, can go long ways. +Truck manufacturer It seems this company does not make trucks, just components for trucks? +I couldn't find that. Could you quote me from the source please? +":First point: Why should we keep this stuff? What is ""Proto-Indo-Iranian culture""? Why do you connect the Vedic religion only to priests? Second point: What do you mean with ""characterized""? This could mean one hundred things. You have to give more precised information an all of this stuff. " +Four reverts on Wikipediocracy You seem to have reverted four times now on Wikipediocracy. Perhaps you'd consider self-reverting your last reversion? — (talk) +" List of micronations is intended to be a list of notable micronations. You can read about the general concept of notability at WP:NOTABILITY. The problem is that a lot of people ""invent"" a micronation with two friends one night, and then try to put it on Wikipedia. Generally, notability requires that ""has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."" That could be articles in newspapers or magazine, TV coverage, mentions in academic books, that sort of thing. There are other ways to become encyclopedically notable, but that's the main one. (We especially don't want things that clearly just fall under WP:MADEUP.) As to how to physically type in a reference, the easiest thing to do would be to discuss the reliable sources on the article's discussion page first to get feedback from other people. Frankly, ever since that book about micronations came out, we've been deleting about three non-notable contributions a week because everybody's eager to make up a micronation and get in on Wikipedia. The new ones that have been added generally haven't made it without some discussion first, so that's the place to start. Once we get past that point, we can worry about how to format the citation for the article. Please let me know if there's anything else I can help with ''' (talk) " +And you should also wait for people to tell what you are known for. After all what we are known for is something that belongs to others thoughts not ours. You should make a survey. Maybe it turns out that you are not known for viciously attacking stupidity but for your stupid vicious attacks. 99.231.81.164 +Teh intarweb would nevar lie to me!!! +Redneck You shouldnt bad mouth NASCAR. You people think you are gods on this site, you act like nazis. You do masterbate, but your hands not stroking your own unit. +Here is another site stating Barbera's Lebanese ethnicity. And no, its not a Lebanese website. http://cartoon-coloring.com/joseph-barbera/. Might have to change the ethnicity to include both Lebanese and/or Italian. Simply because he was born in Little Italy, does not autmatically rule him out as having Lebanese origins. Little Italy is made up of different people. Not just Italians. +"No mention of the Belcher family. Google ""Belcher holbrook randolph"" but lose the quotes " +" Support per above. Kadavoor Jee " +THATS what i was talking about. It's a fact that Estonians, together with Latvians and Lithuenians had the highest precent of population helping to the Nazis in Europe. And DLX saying that the Estonians didn't participate in the German war-crimes, just proves my point, im Psychology this is called denial, one of the most not healthiest in Defence Mechanism. M.V.E.i. +Three editors have determined that there is consensus for inclusion of the material (thru additions, edits, and reverts). Please explain why you do do not believe so. Please explain the claim that it is contentious. +But in all seriousness you do felate pigeons. Keep it up Geoff, best regards -94.192.243.100 +":WTF? It's there to help people find that page, if that's what they were looking for when they typed in ""Extraordinary Rendition"". You'll find these at the top of 100s of WP pages " +So YM gets to: POV push 3RR launch a personal attack and that's fine, is it? You know, I don't care. I wouldn't have punished YM either if I were an admin. He didn't really do anything much. And neither did I. Two guys should be able to have a discussion without Mummy and Daddy officiating. +" Seconded. By whose estimation is Palda ""not noteworthy""? They were a very significant label and are collectible. That's noteworthy! 67.200.59.43 " +" It's all good Skater. I am actually very appreciative of high quality talk page stalking. Cheers, ''''''(TALK) " +The developers should serve the community, not the other way around. Their intransigence on this issue is unacceptable, and so is yours. They have been told time and again what the community needs, but keep dragging their feet. They deserve whatever they get. In particular, Brion is a full-time paid employee (NOT a volunteer) so I don't see why he can't just be ordered to fix the problem. That kind of statement is approaching insolence. I suggest that you find some other project to work on, because, with that attitude, you are obviously unhappy with this project and will rapidly become unwelcome, as well. @ +" Actually, I know a great number of scientists will tell you it is not science at all, but rather religion or superstition. Pseudoscience covers some things, but this isn't really even pseudoscience but an attempt to pretend there is some scientific basis for creationism. They blatently ignore everything contrary to their ""theory"", and distort evidence in hopes of pretending there is some support for it. The only reason it is even called ""science"" is because they want to put it in classrooms, which is something US courts have ruled against repeatedly on the grounds that it is not science at all. 19:19, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)" +STOP CHANGING THE BLOODY HVDC PAGE GIT +Why does this fuck-up have to ruin jazz? +Vasopressin from parvocellular neurons Thanks for correcting my error over at Vasopressin . It'd been a long day. -) Cheers, +My advice was neither harassing nor an attack, it was an appeal for you to act in a mature fashion and resist abusing your perogatives, but you apparently could not. +ArbCom elections are now open! +" Now that is a heavily biased remark if I ever saw one. Talk about racism. And no, arguments like ""Korean is a nationality, not a race"" doesn't make my accusation any less valid, because then I would just say ""talk about anti-Korean bias"" or ""anti-Korean prejudice."" True, Appletrees may have some antagonism towards the Japanese (though I suspect it's only towards ultranationalistic Japanese who he/she feels has affronted Korean nationalism), but making such blanket statements like the one above isn't any better. Yes, I identify myself as Korean as well, but I know idiocy when I see it, be it Korean, Japanese, or otherwise. And just because everyone on this world uses ""Sea of Japan"" doesn't mean that it's not valid to investigate why, or to ask the question ""is that the right thing to do?"" Saying things like ""everyone on this world uses 'Sea of Japan'"" as if it were the end of the debate for something as nebulous as the way things were named in the imperialist era is not only intellectually stifling, but also works to limit free speech. " +REDIRECT Talk:News 9 Now / News on 6 Now +" ""Obviously you are an ignorant twat Mr. Niekerk"", you say? I am an uninformed vulva, an unlearned vagina. (And you want to teach me my lessons?) I'm not sure this is appropriate; better take your smut somewhere else, ""user 58.161.124.131"". Though you do make me laugh. Seriously, choice words coming from one who doesn't know the difference between a string and a course. I have to suffer such depravities and admin wonders why I take a rough tone with these anonymous folks on wikipedia. " +Some times thinks hes invincible and punches himself in the face repeatedly. Non religious and hates everyone. +" It's just presenting a one-sided Israeli perspective to write, ""outbreaks of stone throwing occured on the Temple Mount and in the vicinity, leaving 28 Israeli policemen injured, three of whom were hospitalized; no Palestinians were injured in these incidents"" while ignoring ""Israeli forces opened fire at the civilian demonstrators, including children, killing 6 and wounding 220. In the first few days of the Intifada, the IDF fired about 700,000 bullets in the West Bank, and 300,000 in Gaza. In the first six days of the Intifada, 61 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces and 2,657 were injured, many of them children. At the same time four Israelis were killed, with 35 wounded."" 21:55, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)" +this article was trandlated from: Lampazos de Naranjo in spanish wikipedia +According to the history of Messianic Religious Practices the first edit to that article was by that edit has the caveat tag see this diff. If you want to deny that you wrote that it's fine, and I apologize for saying that you wrote it, it was however in the wikipedia history as something that you inserted. | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ +Hi, I think you just copied and pasted others' messages to me and have not read what I wrote to you. Please write why you thought what I'd written had been false or against any rules,ok? What EXACTLY had been FALSE and/or AGAINST ANY RULES because I'd only changed names to that of its past and present possesPoland). Thank you in advance, ~~PolskiNarodowiec1985~~ +Dear (talk) - I did not add personal analysis or my own commentary. This information was directly reported to the home office select committee and is on government record via the crown copywrite. +" First, I will be civil as long as you're civil to me. So far, you're the one who shot the first volley when you called me ""fanboy"". In kind, I had no choice but to shoot it back to you; all's fair in love and war. Second, I will counter your points with authentic references of my own which I will post for evidence that backs up my argument about punk's distinction. When I do, you better NOT remove them, pursuant to wiki's policy. Doing so will reveal you as a hypocrite, with all due respect. Lastly, and again with all due respect, you are not an appropriate source for information regarding punk. If you fail to realize that punk and grunge have far less in common; that punk is in a class all its own and was not influenced by ""60's garage rock"" - whatever that means; and that your personal taste precludes me as a credible source from my long, personal experience in the punk industry, then, you cannot be allowed to further bend punk history to your personal liking. To recap, I will provide adequate references. DO NOT edit the article back to its original falsehood when I do since I will have furnished you with proof/references. " +The facts: 1. This is a blatant lie, as proven here. Your comment dates from . The last version containing non-religious reasons for conversion to islam, which was active around that time, , did not compare zakat to jizya anymore. 2. You have complained with a fellow administrator in order to get me blocked. Because already several lies from your side have been proven beyond doubt, this does not surprise me at all. 3. People that reverted were mainly Irishpunktom and you, both known for their pro-islamic POV and regularly cooperating in edit warring (also regarding several other articles, such as Apostacy and dhimmi, for instance, in order to press pro-islamic POV. All this indicates a coordinated campaign in order to press Islamist viewpoints. 4. Prove it. The fact is, I have sources, you don't even try to source your POV OR and take resort to weasel wording instead. I will force you to source your statement in my next edit. 5. Prove it. I added sources for every statement I inserted, while you failed to do so. I conclude that it is in Wikipedia interest you to withdraw from administratorship. (Talk | Contribs 25px) +Please do not take or add clubs off the list unless you have sourced citations and don't add people to the alumni list if they don't have an article or verified notes. +"==List of online booksellers== Hell there, just a quick note to say that if you think there are issues with the content of the article (List of online booksellers) it would be best to clarify this in the talkpage, rather than the article itself. Best wishes, " +" ""SCIENTIFIC"" SKEPTIC ???! He never went to college, so why this article calls him a scientific skeptic ? May be some people of his skeptic team are real scientifics, they sure got graded from some college, but this ""debunker"" never went to any college ! so how can wikipedia call him a ""scientific""? Do you know at least if he uses a scientific method for whatever he tries to debunk ? People, he didn't finished high school !!! http://www.sptimes.com/Floridian/41498/The__quack__hunter.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.224.230.5 You can't even write proper English. What college did you go to? What's up, Doc? Thanks for the link, though. That's a great article on the amazing one. I think scientific skepticism is related to following the scientific method, not formal education h2g2bob (talk) For sure. The user 82.224.230.5 would likely know that. It's just trolling behavior. What's up, Doc? I'm not english and I rather be trolling right now than being a 12/13 years old wikipedia non-life geek (you know what I'm talkng about)! Oh, we know what you're talking about, all right. Trust me. His IP is French, so, yeah, I won't hold his English skills against him. His personality, and his intellectual abilities, however, are things that I will hold against him. Back on topic, though, it is a common mistake that people make. People fail to understand that finding out the cause of flummery is a field in and of itself. Knowing when you need to enlist the help of an expert, and knowing what the expert is actually able to do, instead of assuming that 'expert ~= god' - that is a skill that many people lack. I suspect that Randi knows more about most scientific fields than many experts know about scientific fields outside their expertise. So according to you, it's enough to only ""suspect"" his scientifc knowledge to make disappear any kind of information related to his educational background ?! I mean, is this the way wikipedia works ? you ""suspect"", how sure is that?! why didn't you even ""wonder"", that would have been a better reason for making disappear my contribution about his educational career don't you think ?! I can't believe guys like you run wikipedia like kings of the info.. simply pitious.—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I guess we should leave the 'no high-school' line in there. It has nothing to do with 'scietific' vs 'non-scientific'. His methods are unquestionably scientific, which of course explains why so few high profile psychics and fakers apply for the million dollar challenge. I added it back in with a bit of useful context, and minus the inferred line about never having been to college, which is not supported by the given source. Works for me. I'm guessing if he can teach college without a high-school degree, he could have attended college as well. -) The IP again demonstrates that he's either a troll or an idiot, or both. What's up, Doc? " +" So, once again we meet the D part of the BRD essay. So Tennis expert, please explain what criteria have been used to decide which ""certain"" players are included in this list? That way we can start to form a way forward. Thanks. " +" You spell ""similar"" like that, by the way. - " +Sesquiannual I'm going to add Sesquiannual back in as: 1) There is an entry for annual and centinnial 2) It's useful entry, even though there is not much too it. +tiderolls... you are a shitty phage and you desperately need a life. +Oh No, there are enough article's with fotos of her so please delete all my article's thanks... +Just to take two examples from the two sections above this one: Wartime worries - reading what it actually says in the South Wales Police link provided gives a different picture to what is implied in this article. The link suggests that the worries were in fact basically unfounded, while this article implies the opposite. Also the comments about Hitler by Saunders Lewis in 1936 are not put into context - many unionist UK politicians praised Hitler at this time, Lloyd George for one. I don't think that would be put in the article on the Liberal Party though. Seimon Glyn - he was a Plaid Cymru county councillor, not an MP or AM. I could easily find half a dozen anti-Welsh comments by Labour county councillors, but if I put them in the Labour Party article I doubt if they would last 10 minutes before being reverted. These are just two quick examples. Surely all parties should be treated in the same way in these articles? +" TO: KMH03 AND MARK I am not slipping. I have taken responsibility for my actions said I should not have created the bio of duncharris. I shouldn't have done this. Two wrongs do not make a right. I also realize that mark is right I should use the term non-BSF. Thirdly, I am very aware via the creationism article that it is the minority view people who are not respected. Are they given a chance to present info or is the article overrun by the consensus contrary to the minority view article policy? I think we know the answer to this question. But Wikipedia doesn't really care about respecting minority view articles in many cases. Now I realize that some want to take a cookie cutter approach and let the consensus view dominate, overrun and even trample minority view articles. This is not Wikipedia policy though. Now you can say I am unreasonable but it is simply not true. Now I saw Mark's ""assuming that Wikipedia doesn't work"" comment. I do think it is fair to ask if the creationism article is working. Is it working? Is there much civility like some (not many) internet creation-evolution forums I have seen? No there isn't civility. It is a failure. I believe Wikipedia fails in issues like creationism. I think it is a failure due to mismanagement or due to premeditation. But I believe it is a failure. I know it is not blasphemy to say Wikipedia fails in issues like this. Minority view people are often not respected at Wikipedia even in minority view articles. Now why was the Conservative Christianity repeatedly changed to Christian right? Is it because of magnaninimous generosity of a person in the non-BSF camp? No it wasn't. Perhaps in the future articles like creationism will have the minority view truly aired and done in accordance with the current Wikipedia rules. But I think this is unrealistic at this time as I see no commitment at this time." +" Boy, this is the most understated thing I've read here on Wikipedia. While the current details about ZCMI are pretty good, and the list of stores when the chain wwas closed down is pretty accurate, it is hardly an exaustive list of stores that have been in existance. Virtually every Mormon community had a version of ZCMI at one time or another, and some decidedly non-Mormon communities as well. The most remarkable being a ZCMI set up in Rapid City, South Dakota. In addition, a huge part of the history of ZCMI is tied directly with the history of Utah, including the petition for Utah statehood and the fight between the ""Mormons"" and the ""Gentiles"" during the territorial days of Utah. Part of this history should include how members of the LDS Church would face excommunication if they shopped anywhere except at ZCMI. I am not kidding here. Several LDS Church members were removed from the church rolls because of this seemingly irrational justification (based on modern sentiments). Keep in mind that there was a coordinated economic plan to try and push the non-Mormons out of Mormon influenced areas, and this is really in keeping with other business traditions of 19th Century America as well, including Standard Oil and others that would be illegal with current fair trade laws. Saying that the LDS Church was a significant influences is hardly doing justice here. The LDS Church owned the store lock, stock, and barrel. And the decision to sell ZCMI to May department stores was mainly a way for the LDS Church to get out of that sort of business. What is surprising is that is was a subsiderary of the LDS Church for so long, making it into the 21st Century. The LDS Church has divested itself from other businesses it started back elsewhen like a Sugar Company and a chain of Hospitals, and in that context ZCMI is just one of several aspects of life in Utah. " +" Then you would know that the text of the source itself doesn't use the language ""he may not have fired"" in reference to the .357 Magnum revolver, and wouldn't be stressing the alleged incongruity between ""he may not have fired"" and the the image caption. " +And that's not a personal attack^^ ? +No, I want you to understand how to do addition in maths. Also under stand that Australia's and England's total runs are not the same number, making a draw physically impossible. 92.0.100.251 +Please explain purpose of Chinese singers page Hi, I assume you are the same editor as FabulousRain. May I suggest you explain what is the point of the Chinese singers page on its Discussion page, before you create any more links to it? If it ends up being deleted then someone will have to go and remove all those links. Regards, +Her birth date According to http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0002036/?ref_=nv_sr_1, Ann was born on May 3, not May 5. Perhaps that should be taken into consideration. Aaron Saltzer +Tone and verification This article seems very promotion, without any clear sources to support its assertions. Unless we can add more sources I suggest returning it to a stub and working back up from sources. ·:· ·:· +Secular Humanism - Islam's best friend I know you guys want to bow before your Islamic masters, but you need to calm down, Allah is with Atheists and perhaps the Muslims will hang you last if you support their want of khalifah. DEATH TO ATHEISM! +" I will review it. It is possible I might have conflated edit waring and vandalism. I will try to be more specific.  ☎ " +Unwilling Unwilling to use a toilet? What the...?12.26.68.146 +Clay Anderson discusses time zone in his recent journal. It is GMT or “Zulu”. +Recent Edit 1. Moved the Hariakhan Baba paragraph above Post-Yogananda Claims. According to that entry Hariakhan Baba taught from 1860 (before Paramahansa Yogananda was born) to 1924 (before the publication of the Autobiography of a Yogi in 1946). People accepted and revered Hariakhan Baba as the Babaji since pre-Yogananda times. The timing of his appearance also coincides with Lahiri Mahasaya's Kriya Yoga initiation from Babaji (1861). 2. Corrected a minor spelling error from Hari Dasa to Hari Dass. 3. Added Roy Eugene Davis' name and book as support for the Mahavatar Babaji/Hariakhan Baba theory. Basically, to show that there is someone from the lineage of the author of Autobiography of a Yogi who agrees with Dass and (Mahendra) Baba's conclusion. Roy Eugene Davis was ordained by Paramahansa Yogananda himself in 1951. So, for someone like him to agree that this Hariakhan Baba is the same as the Mahavatar Babaji mentioned by his Master and venerated by all legitimate kriyabans from the Lahiri Lineage is not a light matter. 4. Added Sidhoji Rao Shithole's legal and proper name. +Battle Royale Battle Royale, is a pretty amazing game, I have played it, and i feel that it will be very big within 1 year. Its a really amazing game, and should have tournaments, and series. +citing sources Hi. I'm just wondering, in regards to citing sources, is it normal to have multiple references listed, even if they are the same, or is there some way of combining all the identical references into one? for example, on some references I see a,b,c,d,e listed across, but I'm not sure how to do that. Sorry for bothering you, it's just that I'm really confused about all this. Thanks +I really like your picture of Saguaro National Park. Was that taken with a polarized lense? +" Daniel 9:24-27 Daniel tells of the comming of the messiah Jesus. This was a prophecy and the Magi or wise men read the prophecy and identified the Mesiah well in advance. This proves that for men of faith prophecy is fact not mere speculation. Jesus told Thomas, ""more blessed is he that belives without first seeing"". I have posted an article by Pastor David Bay for you to read which explains in detail the prophecy of Jesus's comming. THE UNPARALLELED PRECISE PROPHECY Daniel 9:24-26, ""Seventy weeks of years, or 490 years are decreed upon your people and upon your holy city Jerusalem, to finish and put an end to transgression, to seal up and make full the measure of sin, to purge away and make expiation and reconciliation for sin, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint a holy of holies. Know, therefore, and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem until the coming of the anointed one, a prince, shall be seven weeks of years, and sixty-two weeks of years; it shall be built again with city square and moat, but in troublous times. And after the 62 weeks of years, shall the anointed one be cut off (killed) and shall have nothing and no one belonging to and defending Him..."" The remaining one week is found in verse 27, and refers to the last seven years of earth's history, the period which we know as the ""Great Tribulation"". The term ""Weeks of Years"" was a common Jewish term. It meant literally seven (7) years. The term comes from God's commandment in Leviticus 25:3-4 to farm a piece of land for only six years, allowing it to lie fallow for the seventh. This seven-year period came to be known as a ""week of years"". Therefore, Seventy Weeks of Years was 490 Hebrew years. Note this prophecy contains three parts: 1. 7 Weeks of Years (49 Hebrew Years) 2. 62 Weeks of Years (434 Hebrew Years) 3. 1 Week of Years (7 Hebrew Years) At the precise point in history when the 7 + 62 Weeks of Years occurred, Israel could expect Messiah to announce Himself as Messiah. What great news! This means that Israel could not miss Messiah. All they had to do was to count, be cognizant of current events in Israel as they unfolded, and be aware of this prophecy. This study will show us several things: 1. Why the Wise Men knew the time for Messiah was close. 2. Why Israel missed Messiah. 3. How this applies to us today. Let us now consider the meaning of the prophecy. I. The Duration of the Prophecy This prophecy stipulated that Messiah would be presented to Israel and would be killed after 69 weeks of years had elapsed from the specified starting point. When we multiply 69 times 7, we understand that the time involved here equals 483 Jewish years. Since the Jewish calendar contains 360 days, we can easily see that God is talking about 173,880 days. Therefore, we can expect that 173,880 days after the prophecy started, the Messiah would present Himself to Israel as Messiah-King. II. The Starting Point of the Prophecy (Daniel 9:25a) In this verse , God said the prophecy would begin ""from the going forth (the issuing) of the commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem..."" At the time God gave Daniel this prophecy, Israel was a slave nation under Babylon; however, God had foretold that this slavery would last only 70 years. This 70-year period was rapidly coming to a close; indeed, non-Jewish history records that the Medo-Persian emperor Artaxerxes issued such a decree on March 14, 445 B.C. Therefore, precisely 173,880 days from this day should bring us to some significant event in Jesus' life which presented Him to the nation Israel as Messiah. III. The Mathematics Of The Prophecy A. The First Seven Weeks (49 Jewish Years) If you study the book of Nehemiah, you will find the account of the Jewish pilgrimage to rebuild Jerusalem following King Artaxerxes' decree. The prophet Nehemiah assumed charge of this rebuilding effort, which was carried out in such extreme hardship and danger that the builders carried swords with them as they were building the walls. Thus was fulfilled precisely the prophecy in verse 25b,""...it shall be built again with city square and moat, but in troublous times."" This effort began in 445 B.C. and culminated in 396 B.C., exactly 49 years, just as foretold. B. The Second Period (62 Weeks of Years, 434 years) Daniel 9:26 foretells that the ""anointed One"" would come after this period and would then be killed. This wording is understood by most conservative scholars to refer to Jesus Christ, not at His birth, but at His presentation as the Messiah-Prince. (2) "" +Fuck you bastard. You are a wikipedian. Translation: You have no life, are scum, and have not an ounce of intellectual capability. Read your dogshit articles on your own time, don't mess with me punk. You are worth less than a fucken flea. WIkipedians are scum. DRone on, loser. +BTW, I could'nt even save it until I deleted AND WIKIPEDIA SU**S BIG TIME from the Fox and the Hound rules part. 68.220.162.147 +A quik note: I did not know. I thought it was only for this account. My other account is a public sock. It says so in it's user page. My user page even says so. +Octopus Am I the only one of us who attended school? +" Algorithm for a Perpetual calendar Dear Mr.Netscr1be, my english is not good, sorry. Please see by http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Perpetual_calendars the file ""Permanent_Calendar"" and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitable_calendar. Here is a simple solution. The result is very easy to control. The algorithm is: The days of the week for January and February are the first line in the second from February through December. I wish you much fun. greetings from saxony Karl Nimtsch " +Speaking for myself only, it may be the case that the version I and others keep reverting too could be edited down while still making the same points. However, Skepti, your attempts to date have gone way too far to the other side and as such have little chance of leading to a stable resolution. Please try to find a solution that introduces the material you want to introduce without completely gutting the well-sourced arguments that you either don't like or feel are somehow misrepresented here. I am confident that we can all find a happy solution to this now-tedious debate, but please recognize that it is you who came to change what already existed so it is natural that other editors will be looking more in your direction to forge an acceptable compromise. +Thanks Thank you for removing vandalism that was done to my userpage. +My response 1. its the same site 2. wiki is not always wikipedia, there wiki's for almost everything just a legitimate as wikipedia 3. You are human, just like them. 4. that's a matter of opinion +Of course I am right, dammit! +Peter thanks for the corrections. I welcome any additions. It appears someone did a few days after our comments. No doubt the sources are weak, but you have to start some place. Personally, I don't have the library I once used to have. Thanks again. +|Vietminh]] 09:18, 23 March 2006 +I will only treat people with respect if they earn it. By the way, thanks for blocking me because you think you have some kind of advantage by being an Administrator. You're lack of knowledge on music is disgusting. I should be an administrator here. Then maybe you will have a realiable information website. +Oppose: It was a launch item so it should be their Elven6 +Do not add a speedy deletion tag to this as I may expand it. +I'll tell you what you are... ...you're a horrid, horrid, hooooooooorid, HORRID HOOOOOOOOORRID FING. Basically, YOU ARE NOT LIKED. 81.156.118.227 +Im not sure about this but their is a character in a old computer game (Battle Zone 2) named charles manson so perhaps that should be mentioned in the cultural reverberation section? +{{Quote box | quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.'' | source = Thank you. | width = 20% | align = right }} A tag has been placed on Asian ship brokers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of Asian ship brokers and leave a note on the article's talk page''' explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.| +That's right, I forgot to sign. Sorry. It's a dirty habit I'm trying to kick. Did you see a problem with the edit itself, though? I gave my reasoning for it already. +You're the Vandal! Leave my good buddies Tyar and Stopdroproll alone. Just because they live near each other doesn't mean they are the same hupan! +" He said that SOA Watch can be used, but its a 'weak source' I don't even agree with that. They are the premier researchers on the school/institue. They have filed FOIAs and and discovered the hundreds of human rights abusers who went to the school. They work with news medias and HROs all over Latin America to track these graduates and see when they commit crimes in their home countries and report them. I agree that we cant say 'WHINSEC is bad' only because SOAW says 'they're bad', but look at what happened yesterday. I added info on a legislative action. No one is going to argue that the SOAW made it up that there was a legislative action. It was first linked to SOAW. Someone removed it. It was then linked to a Catholic HRO. Someone removed it. Thats silly. Are we going to use SOAW as long as we say 'according to SOAW' or similar? What about my feelings above. the 7x and 1/7? If this article is going to be 50% on the last 6 years and all these 'changes' and not the decades before, I wont have much interest. It should be most about the long history of the school and the crime and abuses their students committed, IMHO. If not, I can start a 'Abuses by SOA graduates' article? Thanks. Δbutler• " +Photo requests Hi! Do you have any time to get some north Dallas pictures? If so I think these pics would be good: Preston Hollow Elementary School Lakewood Elementary School Benjamin Franklin Middle School J.L. Long Middle School W.T. White High School Woodrow Wilson High School Thanks, +" I didn't call you a ""biased backward yank retard"" I asked why you act like a ""biased backward yank retard"" (which you do) there is a difference, and adding my comments to the talk page is the best way to sway people to my point of view but people who act like biased backward yank retards like to censor such comments go figure92.238.252.159 " +vat d hel du ju vant nau Go fuck yourself get a life +" JJonz certainly shook the place up tonight. Report on AIV, report on AN, report here, various reports to talk pages, etc. ) I reverted one of his socks like 10 times. '''' message'' " +" Thank you, Sir. Much appreciated. ) - • Talk • " +good old Sterbinski! what a pity to lose that flower of Macedonian intelligentsija for Wikipedia ) (ᛏ) +" Rebirth (Jennifer Lopez album) You did the edit i requested wrong, i said put February 15, 2005 as the release date of the second single ""Hold You Down"". But you put February 15 as the release date of the album. can you fix it." +Also, without the first name, we can't assume it's him. +Thank you. — (talk) +I agree, but can we at least agree that someone in the Marines Corps as long as that moron should know that his page is a violation of OPSEC? +with some users I feel are just a little too uptight +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Windows Media Player. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +I don't bother with credit, but bother more on people using my work, without returning anything to the society. GFDL alone seems not acceptable, as Wiki now require dual licensing (whatever it's mean). I'm still trying to understand all the terms and conditions. It's also bother me that the foundation failed to communicate clearly on their new policy to other project. This is the case the hind side does not know what the front side is doing. +" User: Jhoney123 I feel Jhoney123 should have a temporary ban for his contributions on Jon Bodo. I believe he posted ""Jon Bodo is a waste of life and a Gump tree. He swings his branches and makes porn videos that are half porn and half racist. He wears a kkk outfit while taking it in the butt from farm animals.""" +Thanks! Attempts by several ,on his, and article talk pages have resulted in being ignored *sigh*. I suspect not a non-native English editor although grammar is very goods. Yeah frustrated. I think I walked into a prior personality war. 174.118.142.187 +Also, I have the intellectual capabilities of a pebble. +"be in the article and it shouldn't say ""as of this morning"" or ""this afternoon""" +" Because they are mixers and not cocktails. They are named ""cocktails"" because society has fallen victim to stereotypes and anything thats liquid that mixes with anything else semi liquid is automatically a ""cocktail""" +[ping|Ricky81682] Check this very recent Iranian Fars News Agency source, pretty much sums up Khamenei's view on Israel. +" Isn't it nice that an obsessive anti-creationist gets to decide what a good creationist counter is, rather than how creationists themselves counter the alleged geocentric verses. Does Schroeder even understand the concept of reference frames? Does Schroeder refuse to use the word ""sunset"" because it hints of geocentrism? 02:01, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)" +The question has already been answered by Kainaw. My response wasn't intended to be flippant or aimed at you, so I apologise if it was misinterpreted as such. Since we have this little tête-a-tête going, though, I might suggest that if something is urgent you ask Sony technical support rather than the reference desks, and that people would answer your questions more thoroughly if you asked fewer of them. (talk/c) +" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello 71.188.226.218! You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! User:HopsonRoad {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| [[Wikipedia:Overview FAQ|Frequently +" Ha ha! I asked you first. (""I now await your justification of your 'conceiving' as opposed to my 'conceiving of' in the present context."") After you! On other matters – concerning consistency and propriety of punctuation and such things – I see that you are silent. Does this mean that you don't care about such things, and are happy to leave things inconsistent and improper, as they are in your reverted version? 11:49, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)" +MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS BUSY BODY This must be removed form this talk page now dumb ass... full real name are not to be publish on wikipedia..... Remove it now!!! +" Hey, nobody's wrong here, and nobody is defininitely a loser. I think that user Abhishek191288 reverted Markshen1985's edits because there are some opinions to his edits such as logo is a brilliant red kapok delicately adoring a blue vertical tail fin. Also, much of ""History and Development is unsourced. Having said that, Markshen1985's work is remarkable. Also, there seems to be a touch of discrimination here, with ""Chinese"" being thrown around. I'm going report this to . (Talk) (Contributions)(Feed back needed @ Talk page) " +" Break up DoP posted a recent blog on their MySpace indicating a split. They say they might get together in six months ""if we feel like it"", but make it pretty clear that they consider themselves broken up. They say this tour will be a good way to say goodbye to friends and fans, and say ""we're going our separate ways"". 71.59.189.46 " +Its public domain, I've reinstated the image. +"Citations Required == This article has a lot of supposed ""facts"" and only one source. I have added citation requests. Don't take them down. == " +(UTC) I removed the whole list about very dangerous sports, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of extreme sports. 18:39, 24 September 2007 +Or one of these: , . +response re: deleted article in foreign language Dear User RHaworth, thank you for your guidance. I don't mind you delete my contributions. I am sorry you see them as adding clutter and redundency... Since you are kind enough to correct my work, can you please give me a hint as to how I can create links from en.wikipedia.org to bg.wikipedia.org? or are those 2 completely different systems? I see dead links on my page even though I spent time to study how to create links. 18:30, 4 January 2007 (Kyoto, Japan) response re: images I appreciate your concern (and your humor). Initially, I was not able to avoid the automatic 'speedy deletion' of the uploaded image of Florica Musicescu, in spite of an explanation and request for a fair use review & advice... I found this very cruel. So I was forced to upload these images as 'public domain'. The origin of these images is Prof. Svela Protich, whom I know well in person. These are rare photographs of Prof. Protich's teachers- 'one of a kind'- and Prof. Protich determined it's necessary to add them to Wikipedia, for educational and non-profit purposes. However they are NOT to be used for any commercial purposes. Since you have kindly critiqued my work, which I appreciate greatly, perhaps you can also support me to place the images into the right category (for fair non-profit use) without them getting deleted by the system... I would really appreciate it. MikiMilano 18:31, 4 January 2007 (Kyoto, Japan) +"Compare it to other pictures of Lee Oswald. Fabricating pictures was quite primitive in 1963. Look at another Oswald picture on the page. Which viewpoint does the reader believe? Is the ""Big Chin"" a sign of a fake or not? Gamaliel will now try to change the subject and won't directly discuss the ""Big Chin."" We've already discussed the Big Chin to death. It was one of many allegations of photo manipulation dismissed by the HSCA. You want to mention it as if 1) it was never debunked 2) it's the most important thing ever 3) it is proof of conspiracy. Gamaliel, none of the three things you just wrote make any logical sense. 1)Some believe the chin is not a fabrication. So what? This doesn't mean these true believers have ""debunked"" something. Its their opinion. The policy of this web site is to provide all opinions, and certainly not to hide the evidence. When are you going to understand this rule? 2) How important is it? It is relevant to Oswald's contention that some one was framing him. Whether that is the ""most important thing ever' is up to the reader. 3) Whether it is proof of a conspiracy is also up to the reader. Gamaliel, your frantic attempts to delete and hide any information that you disagree with is directly contrary to the web site rules. Why do you continue to do it? Don't forget, there were two Oswald's. Lee Oswald and Harvey Oswald. One worked for the CIA and was the real triggerman, I forget which... But wait a minute, the fatal shot really came from the grassy knoll, from an anti-Castro Cuban, who wanted payback, for no air-support for Brigade 2506, during the Bay of Pigs disaster... No wait a minute Oswald was a paid hitman for the mafia...... oh well It's 3:37 in the AM, all this conspiracy stuff is making me loopy. Goodnight. Gamaliel, is this person above who calls himself ""Mytwocents"" your alter ego, and put in for comic relief? Web site rules of inclusion of all significant viewpoints The evidence of the fabricated photograph is a significant viewpoint that was discussed in the HSCA report. Some experts believe it shows fabricationsome don't. Under the rules of this web site all significant viewpoints should be presented. Claiming that someone else disagrees with a significant viewpoint on a subject is not a ground for excluding it from the article. Arguing it is not the ""most important thing ever"" is not a ground for excluding the view point that the photographs are fabrications. Arguing that evidence that the photographs were fabricated is evidence of a conspiracy, is not a ground for excluding the evidence. Gentlemen. These are basic web site rules. Leave this article in a readable state Don't leave after every goddamn sentence in a paragraph. Use one tag; . Free free to argue about content, but make sure the current content is at least readable. I have just fixed a couple of paragraphs; I'm about to go after any others. You should control your anger. Content that is both controversial and unreferernced should be taken out. Do that instead. Control my anger? What are you talking about? I'm not in a position to verify either way - I just want to make sure that the article is readable for the users. This article is not neutral Surely it's not the job of Wikipedia contributors to decide whether or not Oswald worked alone, was part of a conspiracy or had anything to do with the assassination at all. It seems to me that the only way of rendering a neutral article is to state that Oswald was arrested and held on suspicion of Kennedy's murder, but was killed before he could be tried. It can then be provably stated that the Warren Commission, in its Report, concluded that Oswald was guilty and had worked alone, but that there have since been many efforts and arguments that attempt to disprove this conclusion. It's not our business to decide what really happened, which is what some people here are trying to do. We are here to report on and check verifiable facts, not persuade peop +warning Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Also follow WP:NPA. +Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. T +" [m:IRC cloaks|IRC cloak request]: I confirm that my freenode nick is Cream Bleh Talk " +Hold on a second. This is an insane definition of vandalism. I am trying to add content that i fell is legitimate. +Political Photo Bias Why do all of the photos of Obama with another politician have him with Republicans exclusively. This is a very political minded tactic and just another addition that makes this page more of a campaign page then actual encyclopedic entry. We have to take steps to stop the Obama Admin from literally running this page. Anything less is negligence. Thank you. JohnHistory +May 2014 (UTC) How can it be faked? The .gov domain is used specifically by the US government. 04:20, 5 +Please read WP:RS as to why you aren't a reliable source. +" Kosoo, Yugoslavia,Serbia Can you find here in rez 1244 and last statment of CG the combination of strings ""Serbia"" Just find this combination and I will accept your faculty or what ever you have wrotit here. I know thate you are dreaming about Rusia als superpower evean if you eat USB Brot. Neverminde just find this combination ""Kosovo"" als part ""Serbia"" in the paper witch was acceptyt from USA and Rusia and UN since 1999. - Hipi" +WP:ENGVAR Why isn't this article written in BrEng? +Dennis Shaver Well, I checked the official LSU bio on the LSUSports.net website, the Track & Field media guide, and I did a Google search and came up with nothing. Sorry. But I think an article on him is a great idea, especially since the women are favored to win the outdoor national title in a few weeks. +love from kelly ) may god bless you ) +If that is vandalism then any accusation of being a sockpuppet is vandalism (you sockpuppet) ZOMG YOU JUST VANDALIZED MUH PAGE +Talk:Karina Longworth Hi Tony, can you have another look at this now. There's been some work done. Your opinion is as important as mine. +He and his comrades have been added +There are hundreds of thousands of articles that need attention. A great way to destress. +Also your last point is completely irrelevent, it would be more accurate to say: the natives were calling it maize before europeans called it corn, therefore maize is preferable. +CfD nomination of Category:Incumbent Indian Chief Ministers :Category:Incumbent Indian Chief Ministers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – '''''' (Talk) +I think we've more or less reached a consensus, so I've switched the roster count to 49. I'll leave it to you guys to decide how to handle the character template on the series page. +Your reverts are not warranted. I am not a blocked editor and your reverts are moot. I have replaced both edits. Thank you for reading closer before editwarring, next time. 99.251.125.65 +"FYI- In case you didn't see this.... SkagitRiverQueen making unfounded accusations I have had to deal with this person continually since before Christmas. Someone posted questionable content to her talk page, whereupon she intitiated an unfounded sock case against me at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wildhartlivie/Archive. Then she filed a report here about me. Next she popped up at Black Dahlia, an article upon which she had never previously edited, to revert something I removed and has maintained a overly long, ridiculously drawn out discussion with editors there. At one point, Crohnie admonished her for treating her like ""an idiot or something"". Next she popped up at Charles Manson, also an article upon which she had not previously edited, to throw herself into an issue I was involved in and making unsupported statements, which she has proceeded to edit war over. She then joined WP:CRIME, a project in which I'm active. It is quote obvious she is stalking my edits. Finally tonight, another editor came to Talk:Black Dahlia to enter a content vote, and SkagitRiverQueen made an outright accusation against me of canvassing votes, where she clearly and unequivocably said ""It's obvious that some editors have been canvassed specifically to sway the vote (and am I making an accusation here? yes, indeed, I am)."" I asked her to withdraw her comment and her response was ""And, frankly, regardless of whether or not I can prove it, I don't believe that you *haven't* canvassed for input here."" She was clearly challenged on this by LaVidaLoca here and Pinkadelica here. I want this editor to stop following me around, picking tenditious arguments and making specious and unfounded accusations against me. Wildhartlivie (talk) I endorse these comments by Wildhartlivie. I object to the specious claim that my opinion was canvassed in anyway and believe SkagitRiverQueen's intent is tenditious and assaultive in nature. For the record, she has reverted the Manson article 3 times, even after she was asked not to edit war over it. It appears to me that she is wikihounding Wildhartlivie and would take exception to anything she says or does. This is an untenable situation that needs to stop. LaVidaLoca (talk) As the editor who instigated the preliminary consensus vote (and as such a possible cohort in the WP:CANVASS), I must agree that this claim against Wildhartlivie is specious and unwarranted. I have attempted to instruct SkagitRiverQueen on the proper way to engage in disputes (mainly not attacking other editors based on perceived editing style). This has not worked as of yet. I do see a pattern of ""wikihounding"" here on SkagitRiverQueen's part, as do many other editors, and this has persisted for some time. This feud must end... Doc9871 (talk) IMO, this is purely retaliation by Wildhartlivie for the sock-puppet investigation (exactly why it's the first thing she mentioned in the complaint even though the issue has been over and done for nearly a couple of weeks, now). Not only is she reverting practically everything I have edited recently, she is now reverting entire sections of large articles I have edited[18]. On top of that, she continues to call me by an inflammatory name (""Skag"" - I have noted on my User Page it is *not* an acceptible contraction of my user name; she even mentioned earlier today that she has read that admonition on my user page[19] that is a known slang term for women who have less than savory reputations[20]). Now, in addition to everything else, she has placed an ""edit war"" warning on my talk page *after* she filed this report.[21] I am not in an edit war - and am actually trying to reason with the editor of that article who has been reverting my recent edits.[22] Wildhartlivie has publically called my mental and emotional health into question here in Wikipedia on more than one occasion. Additionally, she has a questionable history that includes abuse of her rollback privileges (see User talk:Wildhartlivie for the warning she recently received and User talk:GTBacchus for her responses to the warning), continued incivility to anyone who edits articles she watches, and canvassing her Wikipedia friends to back her up whenever her edits or actions are called into question (above content from LaVidaLoca is proof of this). And yes, I do believe she canvassed editors by email regarding the issue we have been discussing at Talk:Black Dahlia. Concerning this complaint, you will likely also hear from User:Doc9871, User:Pinkadelica, User:Crohnie, User:Rossrs, User:Vidor, and User:Equazcion - all editors she has canvassed in the past when she feels she needs support in one of her efforts to prove me wrong. Evidence of this can be found at [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. In those instances, she out-and-out lied that I mentioned four of those editors in any fashion - yet, her +hay fuck youhay fuck you hay fuck you +I agree with Rezter, there is no set official source / criteria to say what is a demo and what is an album, therefore you have go with what each band considers each of their releases. It is the band's work, they are allowed to consider whatever they want to. +Re: toolbox Umm yeah sure, i swiped most of it off of some one else, and just changed it up. | comhrÚ 03:14, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) +, More information were added with references: By Vishvax > +(Personal attacks or harassment) ( +Back to the kitchen for you! Suck my d***, leftist feminazi cunt. +Bosnia-Herzegovina not a sovereign nation I move that Bosnia-Herzegovina be removed from the list of sovereign states. Simply, it is ruled by a foreign individual with absolute powers that are beyond and above those of: Constitutional Court, Presidency, and Parliament. I can't imagine a more reliable source than the foreign governor himself Valentin Inzko and his Office http://ohr.int. Some things are self-evident. Here the fact that Bosnia-Herzegovina is ruled by foreign sovereigns who then obviously share sovereignty over Bosnia-Herzegovina (appoint a person with viceroy-level unlimited powers) is a matter of common knowledge, and need not be declared by a third party. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_cite#When_a_source_may_not_be_needed. If I co-own a piece of land with my sister, and someone claims that same piece of land because they live on it (even if it used to belong to their ancestors), then they don't own it until they own it, that is until we give up our shares in the ownership. +By the way andrzej, why did you remove crime from 24 tv series? http://www.sidereel.com/24 considers it a crime show. or do you think all crime films need to be godfather rip offs? lol. 201.13.194.252 +What are you talking about? You left me a message about my deleting content on the Marty Brennaman page: Why would you threaten to ban me from Wikipedia because I deleted an obvious bit of vandalism??? It stated that Marty Brennaman took out a gun and shot all Cubs fans or some ridiculous nonsense to the like. And you're threatening me because I removed that??? Please explain... Tony 5/8/08 +As stated above, at 00:05, 6 April 2009 I left a message to DreamGuy stating that I had notified all of the editors involved in the AfD. This was true then, and it is true now. For DreamGuy to say otherwise (as he did) is false. +, or words mean what they do not what they don't +You are right. I had meant to post this after the Cthulhu Mythos article, and had got lost trying to fathom anything out about this at all. Re-reading this particular Cthulhu article my post is inappropriate, so I am going to delete it. My apologies. +Thanks bruvtakeover. But someone changed the title of the article. Instead of: 'Falcon and Magluta,' it now reads: 'Magluta and Falcon.' Why did this happen? How can I change it back to: 'Falcon and Magluta'? I appreciate your help, thanks. +HoshiNoKaabii2000 and TreCoolGuy TCG claims that DrummerSP is not him and HNK claims that Unorginal is not him. I have been watching out on Hoshi for a while, but I only discovered Tre just now, they were also both blocked on 31 August 2013, this makes me wonder... +, you have a big audience now +Wallace Hartley Hartley was born in Colne, however his family did move to another nearby town when he was about 5-ish. I wish I could recall the town he actually lived in. Someone from Colne, will know the exact town Hartley moved to. It was in 2001 since Ihave been there, my memory is shot.anyone? ~~ +"|Feb 2010 - Mar 2010]] }} I view my own contributions page frequently, and thus don't usually need to be alerted when someone's replied to me with a notice. Soap— " +" SOME SANE EDITOR, WHO IS NOT BUDDIES WITH THESE PEOPLE please help me. Popartpete " +" Please do not confuse my removal of the table with any desire to stop you from editing. But, I am afraid, that the table in its current state is an utter mess which hardly give any meaning. It actually gives so little meaning, that I am somewhat amazed that you don't see how much of a mess it is. I don't really know where to start, because I don't understand what it is even trying to say. For instance, what is the point of all the ""^ ^ ^"" signs? Why are some of the text in bold, and why is some of the text in caps? What does any of "" TAB"" mean? What is the point of putting the names in different places horisontaly in the various boxes? Why are there randomly put in various years together with the names? Most importantly, what is, and where are the chronology? The entire table is just a jibberish mess, I don't find anything meaningful about it. - " +lol dunno which part of uk he/she lives.. hahaha Bollywood movies are widely released in London n around uk, I live here and I know that prove me wrong ! +Centro Tuggeranong Hi Rebecca, we are trying to work out why the Tuggeranong Hyperdome article was moved to Centro Tuggeranong. It still is called Hyperdome, so I would expect that to be the main name. +Block Your voluntary block is now in force for 3 months with no email permitted. You can sill edit your talk page, or edit with an IP. Why have you contested the block on commons when you want to be blocked here? +Beside your own original research, do you have any credible links for your assertions? If not, then I'll revert to as it was, and please, do not change it unless you've got credible sources to back it up with. |Talk 22:18, 09 Apr, 2007 (UTC) +What the hell is wrong with you, person? I have made my suggestion in the very first statement: :Yes, however it should be mentioned that evolution is a theory, and other theories suggest differently. ► ( [[User Talk:Adriaan90|Talk]] ♥ [[Special:Contributions/Adriaan90|Contribs]] ) ♪♫ After that it was just one big cat fight about how stupid my country and I were. ► ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ +george washington wore a hat +As I said, the article you are linking has been questioned by numerous users and the onesidedness of it's arguments is blatantly obvious, citing hardly a hand full of authors (Oh, Huntford, what a surprise= and leaving the requests by other fellow Wikipedians to back with more credible citations left unanswered for more than four months and counting. Consequently, the link you tried to implement is thoroughly contradicting with encylopedic principles so there is no other choice but revert in order to uphold the principles of neutrality and impartiality. +A lot of the history i have been adding Unfortunatly has not been written about a lot of it was part of my own personal research. The Latino history of Oakland has been ignored by Historians so very little is written about it. but what i have added is very true and is just as much a part of Oakland's history so i'm sorry if i don't have links to articles written about this history but i will look for some so you Racist can stop erasing what i write. +" I did a Google Books search as well, but I think the higher hit count for ""quadrotor"" is an algorithmic anomaly. The number on the first page is an estimate; the one on the last page is more accurate. If you go to the last page of hits for each term, what do you find? Usually the numbers will adjust somewhat. I found that ""quadrotor"" actually ended up lower than ""quadcopter"", despite initially showing thousands. Are you able to reproduce that effect? " +" Barnstar The Original Barnstar In recognition of over 10,000 edits, all of them productive and constructive and your work reverting edits that are neither, it is my very good honor to present you with this Barnstar " +"right about the body though it's quite possible that Sara was later exonerated after the escape. She even tells her son ""Let's go visit your father"" so it's possible that his body was later given to Sara" +Korea Development Bank FC Why did you delete article about Korea Development Bank FC? This artcle have references and don't have any reason to delete. Please explain reason in detail. If you deletion is right, so many football club article also deleted. User Cloudz679 did attach deletion tag, when I created new article, He is my stoker and he was idoit. Please explain deletion reason and revive article. +I'm not an English major, just interested in aviation history. The page is open to anyone to edit, spell-check, and append as information as it becomes available, such as the proper name, make and model of this concept, which will probably be announced sometime in the future. Please make whatever correction you feel appropriate, and cite why you do it. If anyone has issues with why you are doing it, bring it up for discussion and consensus. Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Naming has some guidelines. +Ah dude! I dont remember! It's gonna take me a while to find it! It was my dad's book! I'm sure it's around here somewhere! +" Osli, pls refrain from aggressive actions as removing sourced parts as in Naser Orić article or articles related to Srebrenica genocide. I showed what you did, so it is not about my language, it is about explaining your actions which are in my opinion not correct, because first you removed sourced part, then you said that you didn't do it, when I proved it to you, you accussed me of ""aggressive language"". Regards. " +Agreed with Malik, although I am not myself African-American. The characteristic that defines African Americans is their being of African descent. While it is true that their genetic makeup may include other-than-African background, that is at best irrelevant to their being African Americans. Also, unfortunately, the statistic is itself basically a statistic regarding African Americans as a whole, and cannot be seen as being necessarily indicative of any individual African Americans. Putting such information, which almost certainly is inaccurate for the majority of individual African Americans, as most statistics are, would itself very likely be misleading and seen as prejudicial and possibly provocative. +Roy Stanbrook Hi Roy, the article is part of GibraltarpediA. I'm glad you like it but I canot take the credit for it. It's one of the many great contributions form one of our best editors, Anne. Come join our facebook group! +More botheration, re:Open access publishing Since you were the admin involved in an original move, I was hoping you could help me figure out cleanup on the articles Open access publishing and Open access (publishing). You originally moved publishing to (publishing), but both articles still exist with substantially the same content, although subsequent edits have forked the content a bit. Should Open access publishing be redirected to Open access (publishing), as seems was your intent, or is there something more subtle going on here? This is separate from the main Open access article, which Open access (publishing) appears to think it is, based on the hat note. And the Open access (disambiguation) dab page doesn't refer to either of the two publishing articles. At this point, I'm rather confused about what is intended to go where. +mildred taylor is she is totally stupid o.j +" I was giving advice (""You may wish to consider...""). If user A.Z still wants to blank his page than he should do it personaly. " +Nominated your horrible article for deletion. Sorry. +Haha, I fucking pissed myself reading this ') Thanks, i needed that after 3 hours trecking around in warrington with the worst cold ever. I mean it, thanks )) +Reyna Please wait until the official retirement announcement (scheduled for July 16) before adding those details to his article. We don't jump to conclusions on future events, per WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks. +Oh look more threats and he outright misrepresents the situation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Talk:Phyllis_Schlafly: +" Headlines Can you please add this comment to the Headlines on the main page, because I don't have access, since I am not an admin. Thanks! The 79th Academy Awards is held in the Kodak Theatre in Los Angeles, California. " +" Casing stones I printed out this article and noticed that the casing stones were described in two different places. It threw me for a loop because the first time they were mentioned, it was a bit more specific. Am I the only one that noticed that? whisper " +" Move The page ""Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Candidate lists to be migrated to Wiktionary"" has been moved to "" " +trust me. my mom is writing out the family names. ill give you your citation after that. namaste. clay edward weinaug +Assyrian culture I feel that the article is absolute garbage. I recently did an edit on Assyrian people/future page in the culture section that sounds a lot better. I would like to hear what you think should be done in regards to the subsections. Do you think I should take the bulk of that section and replace the actual article? I've done a lot with the future page. I would appreciate some help from someone. Chaldean wrote the section on language and I revised it a bit but other than that I haven't had too much help. Could you assist or gather a group of people like you did with that miniproject a while ago? I'd appreciate it. +thanks, I replaced the section mostly following the admin's suggestions. come help clean it up if you wish. +This incident has been reported to the Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Here I simply note that the thrust of Vabio1's argument is the claim that the facts supported by the biased campaign website citations are true. VaBio1 urges readers to verify them for themselves, i.e. do original research. This is contrary to Wikipedia policy. +" I expect that the author intended to communicate ""in the same 7-day period"", as in 4 + 7 = 11. " +I have most of the episodes from the first 2 seasons and all from 1991-1994 (1991-1996) so just tell me what he did and I'll look at the tapes. Sounds far-fetched tito me, Karen. And no when i said lie I didn't mean you in particular. It sounds like a joke. Also MMC doesn't list guest-stars anyway.Rocky +" ""No, we're just trying to serve WikiJustice, as I call it. Vandals will get peneltized for what they did wrong. "" peneltized ??? WTF ?? peneltized ?? stupid cunt . learn to spell" +Gather the crumbs of happiness and they will make you a loaf of contentment. +Here's the unsourced addition: Most recently, Cockroft has proposed that Hamlet suffers from bipolar disorder. This can be seen in his extreme mood swings between deep, suicidal depression ('oh, that this too too solid world would melt') and his 'antic disposition'. +Barn Star Award Hello. Thanks for sending me that Barn Star Award. I really appreciate that. I had never heard of it before, as yours was my first Barn Star Award ever on Wikipedia. After receiving it, I looked it up to see what it is all about. So, once again, thanks for taking the time to send it. It is good to be appreciated and to see that my work is taken note of. As an aside, I do have a sincere interest in the Academy Awards topic and thus it is important to me that the article is good, clean, accurate, informative, etc. Thanks again for noticing my work I appreciate that you took the time to send me the Barn Star. Take care. Joe ( ) +" Thank you very much for trying, Oda Mari, I really appreciate it! What would really help, I think, is if I could find Japanese adult industry awards... Once in a while I find that some performer has won some adult award (for example, Yua Aida won the ""Japanese adult grand prix actress award for the year of 2005"", and Sora Aoi won an award at this ceremony in 2003) but then I can't find anything about the history of the award, who won in other years? Who won other awards at the ceremony? etc... Also, it appears to be a recent award, so it wouldn't help with the articles on older performers. I do find occasional mentions of awards given during the Nikkatsu roman porno days, in the '70s, which would be useful for articles on actresses and directors of that era, but again, nothing beyond just one mention... Very frustrating... Anyway, thank you for trying to help, and let me know if you come across any information. Regards. " +"Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. xd(?!?) " +Hi Robert! How are you doing? I will be very thankful if you help me out! I see that you are a programmer and that you like Star Trek. I don´t really know about Star Trek, but I will love to know more about programming and doing my best at writing articles for Wikipedia. My first job is to contribute with the articles on Municipalities of Oaxaca, so I think I will be reaching out for help later. Thanks so much!! Zaira +" Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. 52talk to me! " +I think most (if not all) of the other UK Singles Chart number ones lists have also been moved to match. Thanks very much Chris! (talk | contribs) +Yes, this is not the place. Sorry that you don't like Connecticut. I don't either, but it's an encyclopedia article. +Hawaii five 0 I saw you deleted list of hawaii five 0 characters and posted a link saying it was copied from that website. Did you not realize that website copied it from the wikipedia page because the entire page is word for word the same. You made a mistake and wish to see the page restored. +" [unsigned, but by User:Nortonew First, please sign your comments. Any easy way o do this is to use four of hese symbols in a row: ~ Second, two solitary web references does not prove the legend exists, as it is quite easy for people to create pranks and get them up on websites, or have misheard rumors, and so forth. Wikipedia policy requires verifiability and notability. This article does not cut it in either criteria. Third, you don't understand the meaning of the word ""legend"". Some one simply telling a story somewhere does not make something a legend. This particular article sounds more like fakelore instead of folklore. Fourth, it's your opinion that my edits were wrong, but then you, like a lot of new or infriequent users here, seem to have the ideo that your opinion should overrule other editors with more experience. Note the submission page says that you must accept that other editors with edits and change your article mercilessly and you must agree to that before you submit. If you think my changes or comments were horrible then you are probably way too thin-skinned to be participating at Wikipedia. 21:39, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)" +" Water use for Marcellus Shale fracking Removing water trucks from road: 1st of its kind in county, pipeline to cut number of trips to drill pads] Williamsport Sun-Gazette May 7, 2012 By DAVID THOMPSON, ><>°° " +Sarbajit Roy I cant understand for life of me why you keep sending this article to India Against Corruption. +2009 (UTC) You are right, India will have to follow Gandhi's philosophy of local self-governance sooner or later. People have lost faith in the Constitution. 14:23, 29 September +" Dear THE HYBRID, You are what we in my family call a ""penal toad"", I sincerely hope someone kicks you in the balls if you have any. " +" An admin already has taken a look and dismissed the SPI. This is because they don't agree that the evidence supports your ""fact of the matter"" enough. Persisting in the matter won't get anywhere on SPI, they only deal with sock accounts. They will not deal with any matters regarding civility, or his accusations. If you want those looked into, there are other admin boards designed for those claims. The SPI will simply be archived as no action can be taken with no conclusive evidence. However, if you and Cowboy persist in arguing on there, chances are you will both be blocked for disruptive or uncivil behaviour, depending how far it goes. Admins are also only intolerant of personal attacks where they are undue. If someone has been goaded into losing their rag, the tables may be turned back on you. Simply put.. shit happens. Like I said, better to drop the stick than play fetch with a dog that never tires. No one is going to ""win"" this case, no matter how hard you pursue it. I see no evidence of canvassing either, in the correct sense of canvassing, which is when you look for supporters to affect the outcome of a consensus. Just remember one thing, we're aiming to develop an encyclopedia here, not play peace makers for petty feuds.  [Chat • RFF] " +Hi This has been removed from the Richard Armitage page. Would you please reinsert it as it's important people know about it. −TAB Richard's Worst Fan: KiplingKat −TABTAB −TAB KiplingKat is the most hated person in the RA fandom. She is obviously a deeply sick and twisted person. She is notorious throughout the fandom for her vile antics. Here is just a sample: http://www.journalfen.net/community/wank_report/1488.html?replyto=8839632 and http://www.journalfen.net/community/wank_report/1488.html?thread=8560592#t8560592 −TABTAB −TAB She has terrorised the IMDb boards to the extent that many people won't post there. −TABTAB −TAB She has done very real harm to innocent people. For example she got a person fired from her job by contacting that person's employers and claiming that the person was a mad RA stalker. To their eternal discredit, the employers didn't bother to check her story and simply took her word. Had they made even a cursory investigation they would have found ample evidence of her malicious and deranged behaviour. −TABTAB −TAB She has claimed her behaviour is due to Bi-polar disorder. This is insulting to people with that disorder. There is absolutely no evidence bi-polar disorder causes people to be belligerent, hyper-aggressive, malevolent scum. −TABTAB −TAB This malignancy known as KiplingKat should be excised from the otherwise wonderful RA fandom. +Those are false accusations, my edits are always constructive and consist of facts. You feel good about yourself for the ability to delete anything you don't like? +" The edit I was commenting on was this: [] on the 12th. I'd come across the following comment made by Ross on the nativity talk page: ""Many of the items are made to look like contradictions, but can be easily harmonized."" This talk of contradictions and harmonization made me wonder if Ross was some sort of fundamentalist, so I clicked on his talk page to find out. control " +2011 (UTC) For reply pl see here 17:39, 3 September +Actually, I think this stuff is interesting, so it's not that. But still, there is a good chance that your comments are pushing an interpretation. Is that a fair characterization? Could you source some of it? That would add something to two articles. +First off, 3RR is the biggest load of bullshit i've ever heard. Second, Maybe if you douches would READ THE DAMN EDIT SUMMARIES, this wouldn't happen. - +Stupid people and words don't mix. Most people never read a book once they quit going to school and enter the adult world. This article proves it wholeheartedly. +14:10, 3 October 2008 +Yes, there are good articles on Islamic fundamentalist, Islam as a political movement and militant Islam, and a stub on Islamic parties, which describe the issues in more depth. There is or was also an article on Islamism which presents a biased Wikipedia:USPOV that is only widely held in the US and Israel. The demographic information doesn't belong here but in Islamic World. +Bell Jar Hi Bluejay Young, Apologies for deleting your Bell Jar citation. I saw the audio snippet only on the cited site, which has 30 secs of interview only and doesn't, itself, 'signpost' to any info on the book or Plath. Looking closely again I see that the full interview is accessed underneath by registering on the site. I'm moving too fast these days. I've replaced the citation. Best wishes +I think that this should remain as a seperate article because it is to big to be included in the main Friends article. +" If it's help you, I'm looking specifcally for info on what led the author to create the series (or any thing related to its conception/production) or about the manga/anime impact in ""real world"". Basically, info what I could use to create a ""Production"" section and expand ""Reception"", even if it's only a bit. " +Nothing says Lesnar is on the card. No one out there has said how sick he is and how long he will be out. Lesnar vs Carwin shoudn't even be considered on the card yet much less giving it naming rights. +" ====== i agree in many ways. personally, self-harm is at one end of a spectrum, suicide ideation at the other. self-harm is my mechanism for coping - inflicting pain on myself as a means of distracting my attention away from another type of pain - note the general idea of wanting to feel a certain type of pain over another type of pain. contrast this with episodes of suicidal ideation, when it seems that no coping mechanism can help. the goal becomes to eliminate pain (in all its forms) by terminating my life - the pain involved in the process of terminating my life becomes a consequence of the goal - note the careful planning and selection of a suicide method, driven by the general desire for a ""quick and painless"" death." +Restored notable claim from mainstream academic/medical source. +You may face serious consequences for your behavior. +" My point is that contrary to certain media outlets using the term for commercial advantage as well as fans of RFC 1872 clinging to a fiction the 'Club never really died', the term 'Old Firm' can only be in existence when both Club's the term was used to describe are also both in existence. Here we even have the current THE RFC 2012 head of media communications describing how RFC 1872 did in fact die whilst making the comment ""No matter how Charles Green attempts to dress it up, a newco equals a new club. When the CVA was thrown out Rangers as we know them died 1 other media outlets describe CVA rejection meant '140 years of History' formally ended 2 3 4 5 6 [ttp://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/rangers-face-massive-rewriting-football-club-history/3936 7] Now we also have the head of the Scottish Football Association giving us an insight into the consequences of there being NO RANGERS AT ALL 8 This is where the fiction was created that the 'Club didn't really die' absurdity. The whole point of this 'Old Firm' page should allow for this information to be displayed because you know fine well that people outside the fanbase of RFC 1872 DO NOT RECOGNISE the term 'Old Firm' because of the compulsory liquidation event. Of course there are going to be commercially driven news organisations in particular keen to cling to the term in order to generate money, however the term is no longer representative of the two Clubs it was used for to describe. It is not unreasonable to suggest it should be in there to make people aware of the reality." +" Why did you delete my correspondance without reply? Maybe it was accidental...if so here it is again. Thanks for taking the time to explain Tokyogirl79. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ""flat-earth society"" type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ""community"". Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ""Speedy Deletion"" I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ""Nassim Haramein"" and ""The Resonance Project"" in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-""free"" encyclopedia. Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? Best Regards, J " +Tate's book Haing read his latest book, he gets his information from Eduard Neumann and Hans Ring/Christopher Shores. +Regarding edits made during November 5 2006 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. -(Talk·Desk·) +Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection Hi Jim, I see that you have deleted the page of Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection for Unambiguous advertising or promotion. This is strange in my opinion since the institute is not a company or a business agency but a research public institute so we really do not need to advertise anyone or to promote something. Our institute is like this: Istituto per le applicazioni del calcolo or like this: Institut de l'information scientifique et technique Our page is only more detailed. May I ask you to explain me why the page has to be deleted and and also how we can improve it in order to be more compliant with wikipedia? Moreover I do not have a local copy of the page and I would like to have back the text since it took me a lot of effort to prepare it and I would re-use part of the text. Can you kindly explain me how to retrieve the page content? Many Thanks +" I'm sorry if my post read as an attack. I was not attacking COgden personally, only the confusing discrepancy of his doctrinal position. COgden plainly states he is LDS, however his position seems far from what the Church teaches doctrinally. So I believe COgden can be fairly asked whether his status as LDS is that of one active in the faith. There is no judgement on him intended based on his activity, but it does help clarify his POV or balance on some issues. talk " +"""Even more meticulous interpretations of the Paleolithic diet tend to omit details, including but not limited to the very high-caloric throughput of Paleolithic humans, the dramatically different ratio of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids that now prevails, the dramatically different ratio of potassium to sodium that now prevails, the dramatically lower intake of fiber that now prevails, etc."" This clearly indicates that there have been detailed studies but that there is limited evidence. " +You sad cocksucker..stop editing my article otherwise I am going to report you and sue you!!!!!!!!!! +Go fuck yourself you faggot - +" Categorial vs categorical Although the SOM gives these as synonyms, Lambek clarifies that categorical refers to categories from category theory, whereas categorial refers ""categories"" in the sense of the Polish school of Logic, that is to type from type theory. ping " +That would be hard to avoid.... Unless I had multiple accounts [You will never find them all]. +I actually did intentionally remove the sub-brigades of the Zintanis because there are too many different militias involved in the conflict and if we keep adding all of them the list will be a mess. As for the brackets you added for the Libyan National Army on each side, then yes, you were right. I didn't notice that and you did well by adding them, apologies. You also did an excellent job in the background and the following sections, but I would really appreciate it if you cited some of the info you added. Thanks, +NO! It is a lie, that Anton Fick was an official member of Kiss in May 1980. It is not the truth! 141.91.136.40 +The article should be unprotected on 25 October . After the article published on Le Monde newspaper , it's been recalled on the French talk page that hiding specific dimensions of a topic is considered WP:POV . The current montage doesn't even show the actual city, only a collection of lifeless landmarks close-ups. For the matter, this has raised enough concerns in France for the story to be also mentioned on a major radio, Europe 1 . This is why, I believe the better way to calm things out is to go for the conservative option which is to use the same image in the English version than the one used in the French version. An image which is a good consensus as it does show the Eiffel Tower, the undisputed symbol of the city, but also its urban surrounding landscape and its full dimension as a metropolis. That's the only way in my humble opinion to reach WP:NPOV in this case. +I suppose we can say that the canvassed RfC is not as conclusive as the result of the 3 RMs, no. But the specific issue of place names was not raised, and some of those invited to the RfC are against French and Irish names too, so all in all, no reason to ignore the results of the RMs. +Flags Hi there. Further to your recent edits, please do not add flags to the infobox in airline articles. This has been discussed in the past and a consensus was reached that it was unnecessary. See discussion here. Thank you. +" Thanks, I've added some other comments. Regards,  Chat  " +Freepsbane is a troll +" Thank you for your help, Ched. I must point out that I had originally requested review of this dispute but was DIRECTED to continue discussing this before that could happen. See Transportman's note. I am no troll and would never addressed these people directly on my own. Thanks to your intervention, I can now proceed to pursue mediation as I originally wanted. Why is it that ""incivility"" is generally the accusation of people who have both hooves in the trough? I am grateful for Dreadstar's help in reaffirming that aphorism. On another note, I received three email message from Dreadstar that she had left me messages, but - being blocked- could not read them, nor do I see them here today. It is remarkable being admonished by infallible people. " +mate you are clearly a wanker. It's just interesting historically correct article that you (ie. uninteresting internet geeks) have nothing better to do then get involved with. Whats the point of this site if people can't write informative articles if nonces like yourself keep getting involved? +" I'm sure you'll do finely without me heralding to you the latest developments. It goes much better than you think. Previous freak's edits were quickly abolished and for 2 years the page was safe. Until you appeared. But that's not for long. Also, do not delete ""He was also blocked in the past: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz#Maybe_we_could_back_away_from_the_cliff"". THIS IS NOT PERSONAL ATTACK - THIS IS PURE TRUTH, AND THE SENTENCE IS FREE OF CONNOTATIONS. THE TRIAL ALWAYS CHECKS IF THE DEFENDANT HAS A HISTORY OF BEING PUNISHED FOR OTHER CRIMES. I'll start the reporting process itself soon, more details on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz#Stop_vandalizing_.22CMNF.22_article 95.28.219.174 " +" Yes, that is what I intend to do; I've done it for a few articles in the past. I'll bring it by for your review before moving it to mainspace. Cobra " +Perhaps next time you should should not be so kean on grassing people up. Do you get off on your warped idea of 'justice'? It seems a lot of your warnings are wrong. You need to get out more. Oh noes. Personal attack. Go pretend like people care what you think and report me. I know you're getting hard thinking about it. +Another test One Way Family +" Status, let me ask you somethingwhere do you think these budget quotes you put up as gospel come from? They come from people at these websites evaluating the information available to them. Nobody ever calls them from the studio and says ""Okay, here's what we spent on this movie."" They do not like that information to be widely available. In their perfect world, nobody would know what they spent on their moviesthey'd announce a preliminary figure before one frame of film was shot, and no matter how much higher the actual expenses went, that's what people would quote. But we're curious to know, and it's part of how we decide how well (or poorly) a given film did, so in the very rare event that somebody directly at the center of financing a given film says ""Budget was Mid-30's"", that's actually a big deal to a site like box office mojo. They take that very seriously, and they will use that to base a budget estimate onknowing full well that's not the exact figure, and neither they nor any other website will ever have the exact figure. No movie ever costs exactly 10 million, 20 million, 100 million, etc. It's always approximate. It's never exact. And it's usually lowballed, because studios want people to think they made more money than they really did (or in this case, that they lost less money than they really did). Now you can see I haven't edited the budget info for this movie in days, so what exactly is your problem here? You know, if I'd just emailed bomojo on the quiet, it would say 35mil on this article right now. But I was honest and aboveboard, and this is the thanks I getbeing treated as if I got away with something. And you're insulting box office mojo into the bargain. What makes you think they're that easy to fool? They had access to all the same sources Arre used, and they didn't think they were persuasivethey were persuaded by the article I sent them. And honestly, I'd rather have that info there than here. But it should be here as well. I won't take it on myself to put it upfor now. But you should think carefully about how this looks. And that's all I have to say for the moment. I'll be watching both of you. " +. I'd say he is more of a geek than a nerd +Hey Man Thanks for reverting my vandalizing which was a tactical response to what I perceive is an unfounded e-attack Phaedrx here. Dennis Donaghy. How are you. I dont care anymore is the point. I an not a vandal so if you have time and might want to help me. By help I dont mean screw me over like Ellin Beltz did. If not, have a great day and thanks again kind sir. +You need to stop changing the Final Destination cast on the articles. Don't remove previous hidden notes and replace them with your own. It doesn't work that way. Also, stop changing the Final Destination 5 one. The cast poster hasn't been released yet so how the hell are we supposed to follow the credit block? I know you wish to see the articles the way you imagine them, but you need to discuss it first. Stop being a fool and follow the guidlines or you'll be reported and your account will be terminated. Thanks. 76.237.15.12 +...Is going HEY GUYS I'M VANISHING in all your edit summaries really the best way of going about it? Because it's on my watchlist, like, 12 times right now. talk +I have no doubt you find it diffucult to control oyur emontions but its not to do with aspbergers, if you listen or use and a experiance editor can help you dnt get intoa fight is the best advice i can give you +(actually, they're also showing signs that North8000 might be their next target for a campaign of harassment) +Thanks for using the GFDL license and sending in the e-mail. Once the permission has had a few days to work its way into the system I will restore the articles I deleted. Best, +*Evil eye* Yeah i went a bit over the top on April Fools, I didn't do any in real life nor did i recieve any or even hear the term. So my quota wasn't filled and i only had one possibly solution. +ParaFN-FAL? Hey, I was wondering where you got [Image:ModernparaFAL.JPG] ? I've never seen an FAL like that. Would you respond on my page? I'd really appreciate it. +Seeing how it is written in python i wouldn't download it in the first place. GUI python apps are a complete and utter failure. +Kind of a stupid response given the name of the article. +. Please see Bellemain et al. 2008 +All i can remember, in fact, is schnarquing your mom last night. +" 04:28, September 6, 2005 (UTC)" +Tried. Exciting if we get it sourced! - Samuel Rodigast Samuel Rodigast +" Oppose As pwe protonk - ""Needlessly euphemistic. Implicitly blames google, which perpetuates the misconception that google is somehow behind the ranking."" - who says its a problem - he seems to be doing well on it. " +" ""I think this is important"" is not a valid argument Your response to multiple editors' tagging your pages for deletion has been ""the work of Dr. Adoni is now superior"" with elaboration. That doesn't work on Wikipedia. It's not enough for you to argue, however strenuously, that this work is really important. You instead must cite reliable, independent sources (what are those? see WP:V) to support the claims. You and everyone deleting the 8 Prime Spirals are all LIARS the original article was CITED it cited peer level speed tests of all the top prime algorithms. Yet you twits claim not verified. BS. I VERIFIED MY CLAIMS. This is why the world of Academia considers wiki to be run by clueless power hungry twit mods that know nothing about academia. READ THE CITES IN THE ARTICLE YOU TWITS DELETED I shouldn't even be wasting my breath on such nazi censoring worms. PUT THE PAGE BACK it was citd to GITHUB speed tests. The new Prime Spirals beat all the other prime algorithms, and wiki has pages for the slower prime algorithms. PUT IT BACK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals GITHUB is where the tests were done and not one real mathematician or computer programming expert question the results since anyone can duplicate them from the open source software. https://github.com/evandrix/Splat/tree/master/code/demo/pyprimes-0.1.1a/pyprimes-tests https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2011-December/087209.html So the original article CITED major outside sources to PROVE THE CLAIMS drprinceton" +I'm sorry; what is it that I did that offended you? +" I disagree, as this article has had a history of people trying to add irrelevant material to it (such as the costs for proper supervision). If you review Wikipedia:Article titles it says (emphasis added is my own): "": Article titles should be recognizable to readers, unambiguous, and consistent with usage in reliable English-language sources."" Also ""The ideal title for an article will also satisfy the other criteria outlined above; ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined by reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more common. For example, tsunami is preferred over the arguably more common, but less accurate tidal wave."" Leaving it as just ""Kosher tax"" has proven time and again to be too ambiguous, and so per WP:COMMON I maintain that Kosher tax canard is a better proper title. " +Changed outbreak date from 2012 to 2011 I changed the outbreak date to reflect 2011 instead of 2012. You can read the official report which states that the investigation started in October 2011: 24.225.23.137 +I am Lucy Lennon. I wrote to you Arcayne. +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. × +Humans Are Worth Saving Even from Galactus. 24.28.70.129 +You have NOT heeded your last warning. A Block of this ip is in progress. Have a nice day ) +" For your convenience, I'll add one here, to the end of this paragraph. It is usually sufficient to add the reference to the end of the paragraph, if the entire paragraph can be traced to this reference. Because your talk page does not have the special 'Reflist' template, the reference I add here won't show up in your talk page. " +" I have to agree that a description for this publication is magazine or professional magazine. As stated earlier, financing is not a concern as it appears to be common practice for academic journals to charge a subscription, unless it is an ""open-access"" journal. However, based on the available ACCU description I am not seeing ""peer review"". As stated above, an academic journal is usually very clear about its peer review process. In addition, a journal's description of its peer review process is clearly recognizable. The description given at the ACCU is hazy or fuzzy at best, but personally, I do not think it indicates a peer review process. Without a peer review process this cannot qualify as an academic journal. As Headbomb pointed out, it may be reviewed by peers and is of high quality, but it does not appear to be a formal academic peer review. It might even be described as a ""professional-technical"" magazine. Here is an article about an actual peer reviewed magazine Computer (magazine), from the IEEE Computer Society. Here is an online description of the magazine , and notice that ""peer-reviewed"" is part of the description along with its coverage. Here is a paragraph description of the review process as part of the author guidelines; . Instructions for reviewers of this magazine are given here; ." +I certainly have not intentionally broken any 3RR rules, and I would argue that I haven't. You accuse me of having multiple accounts whereas I only have one account, and this account only made 3 edits or less in a day, though I do admit I noticed the 24-hour rule does not mean a calendar day but any 24-hour period and had concern. I have not tried circumventing the rules, and typically, from my understanding, a warning would be in order even if I did violate the 3RR rule for a first time in years of reading and over a year of valid editing on Wikipedia, not blocked a week. +Could you list those steps please, so that we both know what you are refering to? (talk|contribs) +" No I'm not. One of the sentences read the people in the protest said things on their slogans as ""Freedom go to hell"" when clearly at the very front it says ""Liberalism go to hell"". Frankly I don't understand why the have to be repeated in the paragraph when the reader can clearly see them in the picture (as I had written in the article), which hardly constitutes as ""censorship"". If I had wanted to censor it I would have deleted that photo. The photo is perfectly acceptable. The previous images were, as noted by other editors, in violation of WP:NFC. Talk Contribs " +Revised history? no thanks. Have fun. +(I don't update my userpage - only you do!) +That's correct. A smaller diameter is held less securely by the sphincter, and is less efficient at allowing gas through. +Galileo was in Venice in the July of 1609. +Hi, Taekkyeon is a sensitive topic because many people want to learn it and not enough qualified teachers to disperse the knowledge. If you truly desire to learn Taekkyeon there are only two masters in the world who know the complete system. One is in S. Korea, he doesn't teach many people. The other lives in Los Angeles, CA. The truth is, you have to either move to Los Angeles or S. Korea if you want to learn the Taekkyeon as taught by GM Song and Im Ho. I will tell you this. GM Song was a bodyguard of the remaining Choson Dynasty family memebers. The top Taekkyeon masters always defended the king, They were in the military. Taekkyeon was a military artform first and a civil cultural game for children and adults later. By calling Taekkyeon a civil martial art game is demoting it from its real status. However, Taekkyeon is still a Holistic Martial art with many healing aspects and a civil game for children and adults. Its all three! Please consider me a friend. Which Taekkyeon association are you affiliated with? +" A few press releases reprinted in the local press are not ""significant coverage"". the only mention in the national press is an accusation of looting . –– " +He's a Texas Ranger, you can see his badge in the last episode. +Logo Question Out of curiousity, why has the coat of arms not been included in the Serbian flag in any of the logos? Is it because it's too detailed to work on-screen/in print? (I'm talking about the official logos, not just the ones here). +"The article now states, ""It was awarded to runner-up Carl Lewis, who himself had tested positive for banned substances prior to the Olympics, but was not banned"". I feel this should read ""... who himslef tested positive along for banned substances, along with 140+ other American athletes, but was amongst the vast majority of these athletes who were allowed to get away with it by USOC."" Please note, this is merely a suggestion, not vandalism. 212.183.134.210 I haven't signed up to Wikipedia, but go by the name of Jonny. 22nd September, 2008 212.183.134.210 " +" Okay, that's fair. I won't be able to comment there now. Will you incorporate into the conversation that one of the IP addys I supposedly outed outed Alphonso Soriano? I think exposing abuse of Wiki policy for the reasons stated in my blog post and violating the privacy rights of a Major League Baseball player could not be addressed if the issues were not raised. I raised them externally to Wikipedia. Is ""outing"" a person who used Wikipedia's anonymity to out Alfonso Soriano a problem? If so, how can one address the serious outing issue, as opposed to the ""outing"" of the real life outer? " +Synagogue articles Jay, still making controversies after all these years? +" author vs director discrepancy In the ""Family life"" section of the article, it is stated that Alda wrote 20 episodes and directed 30, but in the ""Acting career, fame, and M*A*S*H"" section it is stated that Alda wrote 30 episodes and directed 20. Could someone confirm which is correct?" +" My friend posted this about me, and I would like it taken off. ""Thomas Richmond (born 1990), heir of wealthy family"" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richmond_%28surname%29" +Inu Yasha This page has had nothing but vandalism for the past two days. And its had more before. Can you semi-protect it? You can see the history and note that there were no positive contributions on September 20th 2007. +Warning When people have moved on to other things and are going on about their business on wiki in an exemplary fashion, do not try and disrupt the peace by gross incivility after many days. This is antithetical to the aims of wiki and will work against wiki. Also it shows how some people are unable to let go of the old settled dead past and hold silly grudges and not remain peaceful. Also, I assume that others have assumed good faith about you and let you go on about your business in a normal fashion even though you HAVE been blocked for civility issues among other things before. You should learn from them and give that benefit to others too. ) This is re: ur last edit at User:Royboycrashfan 's talk page. Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. +According to Hans-Peter Vietze, Chandmani means Jewel or precious thing. However, I am still not sure wether in this case Chandmani Uul is a toponym nor not. There seems to be a Chandmani uul near Ulaangom (source: a picture book about Uvs, by G. Tsatsralt (or similar), Uul Us Nutag (or similar), UB 2005), but it didn't look very big on the picture. Of course that doesn't mean it can't be significant for other reasons. Baabar uses the genitive forms in Mongolchuud: Nuudel Suudal (paperback), UB 2006, vol.3 (Togloomyn Bugd Nairamdakh Uls),p.122 (=end of chapter 12). The other Aimags given are Khan Tashir Uulyn, Tsetserleg Mandal Uulyn, Bogd Khan Uulyn, Khan Khentii Uulyn aimag. At least the latter two seem to be named after real mountains. +I've seen that threat at the start of DVDs, with no distinction made between uploads and downloads. It may very well be that they only prosecute uploads, but I'm also opposed to having overly strict laws and leaving it up to the authorities to decide who to prosecute, as this gives them too much power over us. I think I will add this to the list. +" FROM YOUR FRIEND: (Hit BLUE) " +image deleted Hi There. I've just deleted File:Adam Nemec (Slovak football player).jpg. Please note that images found on the internet are not public domain but are instead almost always copyrighted - (Talk) +trying to save articles Whilst you are quite entitled to try to rescue articles, I think your best chance of doing it, is actually finding some significant third party non trivial coverage instead of persistently arguing over process. +AC power plugs and sockets Hi, you recently commented at the talk page of AC power plugs and sockets, regarding my reversions of the completely erroneous edits being made by ZH8000. I presume that you did not check that editors claims or you could not have failed to observe that their edits to the article (and their comments to me) were nonsense. You may have noticed that I have now completely rewritten the Swiss section with more detailed information, laid out in what I believe is a more logical fashion, and with references to support all that I have written. It would be very helpful if you could check what I have written, and if you find that it is in accordance with the references given, to endorse it on the talk page. Many thanks. +in an interview before his execution +You will have me blocked? Maybe you have a friend who drives a bulldozer who can do it even better . +I had read something similar, but it was in a paper about projects where someone had overlooked the obvious. If you have a cite then it should be added to the article. 212.183.128.199 +" TV show? Will you please explain of what relevance to this tragedy is one unprofessional TV-show poll? This is not a sociological research you're quoting, its one stupid TV show gimic. It has no bearing whatsoever on the Croatian public's view, it does not provide any useful information, and it polarizes the article away from an NPOV version. Maybe I should include the personal opinion of me and my buddies in the article? I can provide a reference. (TALK) " +" 2009 WWE Draft I went through the text portion of the article. I hope I did not misunderstand any part or introduce mistakes. Regards, — (Talk) " +Actually, she married Michael's best friend. How ironic. Oh well, at least he never found out about that. +Reconsider? Hey XinJeisan, wouldn't you reconsider your withdrawal? I, of course, don't know your reasons for withdrawing, but your contributions for the sumo presence on wikipedia were invaluable. +"::My understanding - and I have seen NO photograph which shows it, that it had orange upon the top of the wings inset from the edges as was the pattern used by PAA. Under any circumstances such would be quite visible. If they landed on the reef they could not have sent messages. The reef is shown in photos from Gillespies book and it shows quite distinct differences in depth. (the density of the photo varies with the depth of the water). The chances of the Electra landing in shallow water with the gear down and not flipping over are slim, a conventional gear, know known rudely as a ""tail dragger"" is very prone to nosing over when undue breaking or drag is induced (witness AE flipping her Vega at NAS Norfolk some years before), the chances of it landing on such an uneven surface while exposed are equally slim. ." +You've a message on your talk page! +@ Hakob Do you know that Wikipedia and Greeks are trying to wipe out every trace of Ottoman history in Greece(also other Balkan states, mostly Christian ones)? Both Wikipedia and tourist guide books in Greece mention Ottoman existence in Greece for a few lines, but they mention Ancient Greece for pages. I went to Kos island and I saw an historical mosque.( Closed of course) There was no sign or no information about it, and even the Ottoman scripts on the mosque was removed. Who is changing the history? Stop your and Wikipedia's anti-Turkish propagandas, you and your fascist president can never gain anything from my land. +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to September 7. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +? What is your problem? +" It should be ""bail-out"", with a hyphen. I've changed it. 01:30 Feb 16, 2003 (UTC)" +existent sourcing for controversial assertions in articles, and edit wars and other types of nonconstructive conflict among editors. +Godd day Good day friend. I added Katy Perry to this thread http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Muppets_(film) 'Cause in the Katy Perry thread here on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy_Perry say that she perfomance a cameo in the **The Muppets Movie 2011** So if Lady Gaga is show, why Katy Perry isn't ?? Thank You ;) And I will add again to Katy Perry ;) +It looks like I reverted it to an old version or something by accident. I was just editing the first paragraph, I have no idea how the fuck that happened. I'll fix it now. +Wow can we say dense.... +Cream my pussy SexBot!!! +" Wobbs, I agree with you man, and I dont know who is creating all these Asian, White/European, and Black/African ""ethnic group"" articles which is borderline stupidity if you ask me. I mean articles on the individual races is one thing, but its not like these groups are some fully cohesive group in each of these countries. However, not every British Isles person that is White is English, Irish, Welsh, Cornish or Scottish, and theres numerous White immigrant or immigrant-descended groups like Arabs, Berbers, Jews, Italians, Germans, Dutch, Norwegians, Spanish, etc." +hi mate he is not NisarKand because Beh-Nam is a Tajik and NisarKand an Awghan, an ethnic Pashtune. Dear Admins, plz check that out also his IPs. They are two different User. While NisarKand and DilbarJan are one and the same User and a nationalistic one but Beh-Nam has nothing to do with such activities. DilbarJan(/NisarKand) claimed he would helping Taliban but since Beh-Nam is a Persian and the Taliban were looking for cleansing Tajiks who could he be NisarKand self since Dilbar is allready NisarKand!? Plz dear Admins, unblock him. Beh-Nam is for a long time on Wikipedia and he didn´t do sth bad either against any nations nor against any User or any articles. The admins of Wikipedia now banned two or three of Tajiks who were one o the important ones here at least they were the sole Tajiks who were active. Plz Admins, ban DilbarJan who is writing articles from his nationalistic view. With best regards +Thereby hangs a tale, actually. I ate my first hamburger about a year ago. And no, I was not a vegetarian before that. +Not sure if you noticed the box up top, but in case you didn't, Panyd is currently on medical wikibreak, so she may not be around to answer your question. +thank you to come on my talk page and insult me in future. Abuse +"And I doubt your ""source"" meets WP:RS. " +Sure. I am all open to it. Though I am somewhat surprised with the issue being raised now, lately those articles seem to have reached a level of stability and consent. +" Could you please identify the policy that states ""Wiki's are not considered reliable sources""? Otherwise I will feel compelled to remove your tag. Thanks. " +blocked can you tell me why I was blocked in more detail? 75.91.169.43 +This assumption that German is the largest ancestry in the U.S. shows how the ancestry chart in the article is a little misleading, because most of the 20.2 million people who claim an undifferentiated ‘American’ ancestry are thought to be of English ancestry, in addition to the 24.5 million who actually specify English ancestry. Even if we decide to exclude all the Catholic Irish, most of whom were English-speaking British subjects when they migrated, roughly half of Irish Americans, or about 15 million, are thought to be Protestants, mostly from Ulster, and therefore mostly of mainland British ancestry too. So in fact there are many more Americans of British descent than of German descent, and they still use their language. In addition, German Americans assimilated and only a small proportion of them speak German. Almost all of them speak English instead. This lack of cultural affinity in descendants has had important historical consequences. It helps to explain why German-American relations have been more distant than the ethnic chart would otherwise suggest, and why German ancestry hasn't always been a big enough factor to overcome diplomatic differences. +" Trinity Hi, Mark! I'm not committed to any particular wording. My concern is to find language that reflects the fact that there are more than a handful of exegetes that maintain that the doctrine of the Trinity is contained in the Scripture of the Old and New Testament. They would admit, of course, that the term ""Trinity"" is not in the Bible and that the doctrinal formulas of later ages are not stated point blank. Yet they see the Scripture as a whole confessing one God, while confessing the Father as God, the Son as God under names such as ""The Angel of the Lord"" and the ""Word of Yahweh"" and the Holy Spirit as God. To me, ""some"" gets to that. Without extensive research, however, I cannot say how many feel that way. What we do want to do is to either find language that includes them all or that sets forth the multiple positions on the subject. Peace in the Prince of Peace, Bob Wyneken(talk) " +Actually if you come off yourr high horse for a minute you would see that he said it was a defining point not a turning point. Please stop making personal attacks. | The otter sank +" Edit request on 14 September 2012 PLEASE CHANGE ""Armstrong's family announced he would be buried at sea.[137]"" TO “Armstrong was honored in a tribute at Washington’s National Cathedral on September 13, 2012. In attendance at the tribute were fellow Apollo 11 crewmates Michael Collins and Buzz Aldrin. Also in attendance was Eugene A. Cernan, the Apollo 17 mission commander and last man to walk on the moon, and John Glenn, the former Senator and first American to orbit the Earth, as well as the current NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. Armstrong was laid to rest in the Atlantic on Friday, September 14, 2012 in a burial at sea ceremony aboard the USS Philippine Sea (CG 58). ” " +Sure, it's unusual, it's Utah. Looking into the camera was the criteria the court used to decide the child is posed. The comparisons are factual, not a biased point of view. I personally agree with you, I think it's nonsensical myself, but you are arguing with the wrong person. The court decides what is child pornography, not me. Take it up with them. By the way, the photo was not erotica like you assumed it to be. It was an ordinary nudist photograph. Yes, I have seen this court case and hundreds of others just like it, but I will never admit that I have seen the actual photograph during the hearings at the state courthouse on the corner of state street and 400 south in salt lake city, where the Trax train stop #5 is at (in the free fare zone), even though I implied I may have seen it, in order for me to know that it is in fact a benign nudist photograph, just like how the court described it. +" Some other inaccuracies... or perhaps misconseptions is a better word... first, you assume that taking part in a war for independance is a violation of ones obligation... that is often a matter of interpretation. To a Mason like George Washington, he was not being disloyal to England... rather he was upholding his obligation by being loyal to ""the country in which he lived""... ie Virginia (and, later, America). Second, You seem to assume that Masons were united in their opinions. They were not. In each of the conflicts you mention there were Masons on both sides... all of whom felt that they were living up to their obligations. (Freemasonry was just as divided as the rest of society). Yes, today we celebrate those ""famous Masonic Leaders"", Washington, Franklin and Handcock... that's because they won. If the Americans had lost the war for independance you would probably read all about those ""famous Masonic Leaders"": Bannister Tarlton, Phillip Skeen, and General Cornwallis. As Lexicon says... you can not make the assumption that Freemasonry is involved in independance movements... only individual Freemasons. Freemasonry is often ""involved"" on both sides. " +(Sorry for any Inconvenience).User:Harry Weasley 14:27, 5 june 2007 +" DYK On 12 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article Ivatan people, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. I believe you deserve the credit. I was wondering why these admins forget to give you this one. " +John Popper http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Riff_Johnson +Userbox MfD Hi, In light of the revisions made to its content, I have closed the MfD as a Keep. Best wishes, +REDIRECT Talk:Chris Smith (footballer, born 1988) +"{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" style=""text-align:center;"" |- | width=""48px"" | || This article was nominated for deletion on 6 June 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |}" +" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello Eddiemendia, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page |- ! +This is a lie, I have nothing to do with that user. You are more than welcome to use the IP-detector to prove me correct. That is a PA against me. +The American Heritage Dictionary and Wiktionary, off the top of my head. All words ending in the -polis morpheme form plurals ending in -poleis. +I won't go into this much further because you're not listening to my arguments, but the ARIS was indeed a survey, and the adherents.com was not from Baha'i sources. +I beg you pardon? Who is us and who is them? And which side am I supposed to me on? -) — +REDIRECT Talk:Codava National Council +I support reverting to Russian. +You should try to respect other peoples religious and cultural beliefs. Not everyone shares the same ethics and morals as you. I find it insulting, when you can't tolerate my beliefs. +I mean ive been a previous user +Σ IS A GIGANTIC ASSHOLE. Σ IS A GIGANTIC ASSHOLE. +Hey, I noticed your save on the Deobandi article. While they are not connected to ibn Abdul-Wahhab, Deobandis are not Salafists either; they are actually a form of Sufism and rooted in the Hanafi madhhab. Salafis as a general rule are opposed to Sufism and are most often do not follow a madhhab or if they do follow the Hanbali. I would recommend checking the article on Salafism and the associated links, as they're quite informative. +" That's very rich coming from you given your exhibited attitude. Sure, block me all you like but it won't change one iota of the fact that: You're the one-eyed leader of a pack of blind ""specialists"" that insist on editing articles about Greece lacking basic information about the country at best (when censuses happen) or purposefully ignoring it at worst (did you ever do anything about the bogus ""census"" number?). For all your ""expertise"" the whole lot of your gang still cannot write something reliable when it comes to the numbers of linguistic groups in Greece. I drop the hint about the V-PRC survey and your sorry lot still go on about Kiesling's State Department estimate. Even after citing the Eurominority reports (while making sure the Arvanitika in Epirus are shown as Albanian) you still have not updated your map of linguistic minorities in Greece to show the Arvanites in Thrace. I mean you fools show half of my island as Arvanite speaking when the language is unfortunately almost entirely lost and despite there being more active speakers in Thrace you don't even show them. So much for ""expertise"" and respect for the sources. You complain that you are misunderstood with respect to your broad use of the color brush in the map of Macedonian Slavic dialects in Greece even when it is pointed out to you that your color maps include areas where there were never any settlements of Slavic speaking villages at all. Then you trivialize objections (""a few kilometers"" etc.) and suggest that what you do is perfectly kosher. But when you prepare a similar map of Greek dialects http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Modern_Greek_dialects_en.svg instead of following the same rationale and including areas of minimal use of the Greek language (even if it was in the past and no more - just as you argue for your Macedonian map) you stop at the borders of Greece. Obviously the Greeks in Albania and Bulgaria (I won't bother with the Greek linguistic presence - especially in the past - in the Bitola, Gevgelija and Strumica region as I expect them to be invisible to you) are not worth recording (or maybe they are mute in your pretty little world). What about the Greek speaking Turks still left in Turkey (mainly from Crete and Macedonia as well as the Pontus)? I mean OK, screw the linguistic presence in Turkey before 1922 - you obviously have perverse ideas of what time boundaries to use - but at least respect today's reality. If my grandfather's bilingual generation of Arvanite speakers make half the island of Andros Arvanite should you not indicate the presence of the Greek speaking old-people in Turkey? Your double standards are so blatantly obvious it is not even funny that a person such as you wields so much power in WP. I would not even be bothering if it were not for the fact that lazy academics outside of WP have started using these monstrosities you call maps... My commenting on content cannot be separated from the obvious biases/deficiencies of the editors responsible for the content. And no-one observing your behavior or that of your fellow goons would assume good faith on your part. " +I have only one question. If some one wants to visit Hargeisa to see laasgeel does he need Somalia visa or Somaliland visa? if all Somaliland foreign visitors are required to have Somaliland Visa this page should be separate. does that makes sense ? +" Well, this got ignored. Seeing as how sperm whales are considered ""great whales"" and at least three of the species of baleen whales aren't considered great whales, I removed the term from the lead. I don't really consider Omura's whale ""great whales"" either, as they don't get to 40 ft (arbitrary, yes) and weren't an important component of commercial whaling (the two species of minke, although important commercially, are too small, while only one became important after the larger species had become depleted). " +Ok, you've been reported because I clearly explained about IPs that I wasnt doing anything and u keep sendimg me messages and haven't done anything to fix the situation. If you bothered to learn about how the internet worked you'd understand that there are a very limited amount of ip4 addresses and with IPV6 there are LOADS more. So clearly somebody ELSE was using MY ip to edit goodfellas then turned off their computer and when i turned mine on i got THEIR ip. So get a life n00b and learn how to use a computer before you go putting people in their places. Your probably a WASP aswell. Just the type. +who would honestly play this game? this game seems so lame, who would honestly play this on their own will??!?!?!???? +" The Silver Chair Ok so someone thinks that ""The Chronicles of Narnia: The Silver Chair"" should be merged into this thread. Seriously, why bother doing that? You are just going to end up moving out afterwards when the movie goes into production in a few months. This is just a waste of time, leave that page be. " +Commons:Picture of the Year/2006 I have voted for 6. -talk +was hoping your the type of rouge admin that take bribes. joke +" Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: Remember you will always protect the wrong version. Remember you must always follow the rules, except for when you ignore them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5) Remember to assume good faith and not bite. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a troll. Use the block ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block. Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in dazzling clarity and descriptive terminology. and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able. ?!?DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. " +L. Ron Hubbard I just replied to your request on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/L. Ron Hubbard/archive2. I would like to highlight that I am keen to secure the March 13 slot on this month's queue in order to meet the centenary date, so I would be grateful if you or one of the other delegates could close this review as soon as possible. +" Wikipedia:WikiProject Mumbai Wikipedia:WikiProject Mumbai has been launched please add your self and we are planing to organise a wiki meetup for mumbai wikipedian please feel free to contact me for more infotalk to me! " +" How many of the claims will turn out to be untrue? It has been said that over 200 people have come forward to make accusations against Savile since this story broke, but the figure of 200 will obviously be on the light side as some victims would have either passed away or not be willing to come forward at this juncture. I find it rather hard to understand why at least some of these victims did not come forward to make accusations whilst he was alive - it has been reported that the odd person got the odd complaint years ago but not to the extent that have popped up recently. If just 10% came forward, that would mean at least 20 complaints, and that figure would not have been secret a for long once the press got hold of the story. I do not profess to understand the workings of the abuser or those that have been abused but it does beg the question - did Savile have such power over his victims that they were so terrified to come forward or are some of the now presented cases just a case of get what you can while you can in this time of recession? It seems that this guy will turn out to be the ""Harold Shipman"" of the sex abuse world, which says a lot more about the people that allowed him to get away with it than it does about Savile himself. " +BS! my family-friendly dialogue meets all P.C. standards... safe as milk... +Thou shalt be ravished in thy buttocks It's sure to be hurtin! +" I want to retrieve Dar (tribe) which has been tagged with Dhar The Dar (tribe) is quite distinct from Dhar where it is being redirected, but I do not know how to retrieve the old Dar (tribe) article which has been perhaps vandalised by the person who has put a redirect for Dar (tribe). This vandalism is continuing with all kashmiri muslim tribes under totally unrelated hindu castes without any basis. I think it just brings down the reputation of wikipedia as ""encyclopedia"" source." +Oh, I am so sorry - I apologise for trying to clear the air and suggest that we try to get along while editing wikipedia. You might want to grow up a little and try to get on with people, right now you are just making yourself look stupid. I don't require an apology, just some basic manners - however after reading the above comment I am not going to hold my breath waiting. The offer to get on in a friendly way still stands, if you don't think it is important, that is your choice. 119.173.81.176 +bastards, i said nothing about changing it! that was not a complaint! +" I decided to take a break from editing for a ""while"". I'm not sure whether I'll return to regular editing now, as I'm still feeling disillusioned by Wikipedia (getting harassed by a nationalist [see the bottom of this talk page] didn't help). Regards, " +Kyle Farley Kyle said its okay, you can email him at kdfarley21@tntech.edu +" This discussion page may contain comments better considered as trolling, posted in order to prompt irate replies that can then be even further ridiculed, in turn. Before you post any reply, consider how you might minimize the effects of trollish comments. Simply ignoring certain comments may be the best option." +" Speedy deletion of Phi Beta Upsilon A tag has been placed on Phi Beta Upsilon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +Fuck you. I'll just make another account. You're a piece of shit sorry excuse for an administrator. +" Nope. ""Killing by hunger"" is not good English, while ""starve someone to death"" is PERFECT translation for морити " +I feel like I can be a constructive asset to Wikipedia; my only problem is that I have severe biases towards many WWF-related persons and I will never give them up. However, I will be a good asset and will resume my editing immediately. Thank you for unblocking me, I really appreciate it. - Unbiased Indian +" August 2009 (UTC) I'm not sure which part of my comments were a slur but if you feel my post is ""invalid"", you may ignore it. WP:RM says that the RM page is a ""place to advertise move debates that would benefit from wider community input"". In my opinion, that is true in this case. If you disagree, feel free to ignore those who are not frequent contributors here. However, there is no Wikipedia-wide requirement of continuous engagement or a particular threshold of ""interest"" in an article to participate in a discussion and I think casting a wide net can sometimes bring forth information and perspectives no previously aired. — AjaxSmack 04:40, 26" +" Major changes to Arsenicum album without discussion but with deceptive edit summaries Neither this edit nor this edit were discussed on the talk page of the article, contrary to edit summary. Editor making said edits is under an unblock-mentorship agreement, though it appears their mentor has taken a break. The terms of the most recent unblock-mentorship was that the editor ""may only make significant changes (anything past typo fixes, spelling corrections, etc.) after you have reached a consensus on the talk page."" I am unwilling to deal further with disruptive single purpose editors-for-profit with conflicts of interest, so I leave it to someone else to even engage in discussions regarding this. " +Hey Buffbills7701, im sorry for deleting your CSD on Concept (Rapper) page because iam fairly new to Wikipedia, but can you please give me insight as to why this article does not have a significant importance? Thank You in advance +NPOV concerns Based on terminology used I have some concerns about WP:NPOV and a broader view might be warranted. +"30, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Your comment Your comment- Well, quite frankly, not everyone subscribes to that notion, and it is quite wrong of you and a handful of others to push your ideology onto people who hold a different opinion on the matter. There is simply no actual person named ""Chelsea Manning"" here. What we have is a man named ""Bradley Manning"" who wants to be called by this other name (and awhile ago it was reportedly ""Breanna"") and referred to as ""she"". That is all. That is the reality that the article should reflect, the policy of WP:COMMONNAME. Bradley Manning was a solider in the United States military. Bradley Manning was caught passing classified intel to unauthorized parties, convicted, and sentenced. After that, Bradley Manning decided to be called ""Chelsea"". That is how the flow of the article should be, these are all things that a man named Bradley Manning did, you can't just flick a switch and rewrite history to say ""Chelsea Manning was convicted of violating the Espionage Act..."" and so on. That just isn't historically accurate or truthful. When and if he legally changes his name, that is when the transition process of the article should begin. That all was simply way too soon. I want you to know that I agree with you 100%. Your comment was one of, if not the best on the talk page. I just wanted to let you know. Thanks. ) 12:" +because i have Adult ADHD and i cant read terms and wiki editors hurts me every time they delete my edits. +Also, there is no plausible reason to base what is considered major in this country on what another country considers major. Italy only has 2 cup competitions and both are highly regarded, the same goes in Spain. However in England we are similar to Germany in that the equivalent of the Community Shield is not regarded as an important honour. This is why CS has never been included in this article in the past, before fanboyism rivalry between Man U / Liverpool fans have destroyed the credibility of the original page. +The correct structure I think this is the correct structure. +" Nsk92, you're talking about quantity here, not quality. Then, how can you speak of a ""great work"", when most of what this TIRELESS DESTROYER (as he/she obviously likes to be called) ever does is annoy real editors by destroying their work? " +" Join the revolution that fights for freedom of speech against the tyranny of wikipedian administrators, especially the evil dark lord/fuck head Kafziel from your fellow blocked vandal/ freedom fighter for the ability to express yourself: Ernesto Guevara de la Serna. """"Hasta La Victoria Siempre""""" +Oh! Yes, I did (although we're finishing an overhaul now).T +Done. Check it out. By the way, is that actually IPA in your username? Ewwwww. == +Edit request on 11 April 2012 122.167.45.134 Shoppers Stop +not a frequently I used to when I first came here.) and +" All maps agree. There is no village there. There are a few houses. This is not a village and there is no point in adding a few houses to the map, regardless of whether you call it a village or not. Nor does it make any sence to add chains of ""villages"" that are literally right next to each other. Add villages with some distance between and only REAL villages where there are actually more than 1 house inside the village. Your missing the whole point. " +" Thanks! I have apologized to Dr. Dec at the RD/M as I have now realized that it was wrong to accuse him without sufficient evidence. It also would have created unnecessary WikiDrama, and been counterproductive should I have proceeded. With regards to the comments I made, I do agree that I could have been far more polite, and it was possibly the haste with which I made the remark which caused problems. However, I did honestly believe that the OP intended to waste our times - the reason I did not proceed to the talk page was because I thought it was too small a matter and only deserved a small remark. In the future, I shall take your advice to heart; if I do respond to an OP at the reference desk for a similar reason, I shall ensure that it is only done if absolutely necessary. Mostly, however, I will ignore such posts and let others judge the content. Thanks for making me see things in this manner! T " +" Tan ""Wikipedia's workers or whatever"" Tan go to hell or just grow some balls for once. Or get a girlfriend rather than spending your life on wikipedia" +Please do not add any more links to LanceFans.com, they will be removed. +i dare you i see you have been hiding in your hidey whole claiming chinese are crap. i dare you to actually come out with evidence to your false claims publicly.... i have proof to rebutt every single one of your arguments, you claim qing is korean, oh yeah you liar, if they were korean, why did they attack korea, make it pay tribute, force it to erect a humiliating column in its honor, and turn it into the hermit kingdom.... i dare you to reply...... +Sampled piano rift... I'm certain the piano rift towards the end of this song has been sampled into another 90's pop song but can't for the life of me remember what song it was or who did it. Can anyone help? +Hey Hi! I understand your block, but can you tell me if you used the same criteria for the user who was always reverting the edits? Just wondering... I have been editing here since 2007, creating articles and greatly improving some already existing pages and I was never blocked... I am editing on Wikipedia most of the time, even when I'm on my little free time at work. Did you check on that before you blocked me? I really am found of Wikipedia's principles saying that all knowledge show be free and available to all. So please... the next time you have problems with my editings and if I say rude things to annoying users (may them be anonymous or registered on Wikipedia) consider what I just said. Thanks for your attention. +Barbequed cat Patrick, I removed the paragraph you'd added to 2009_Hudson_River_mid-air_collision regarding the content of the controller's phone conversation. I don't doubt that you considered it relevant, I am not accusing you of vandalism - but I do feel that the prior (remaining) paragraph covers the fact that there was an improper conversation, and that it appeared to not be a causal factor in the crash. The information you added, IMO, put a POV tilt on the article. I hope you understand my perspective on this. +Don't tamper with history for your own purposes. Any evidence./ +Stalled DYK nominations I wonder if you could help resolve the block on Template:Did you know nominations/Grootegeluk Coal Mine, Waterberg Coalfield and Template:Did you know nominations/Giovan Giacomo Paleari Fratino? Since you started the re-reviews of these articles, and perhaps have more influence with +SM City San Pablo, Inc Please check out this thread on my talk page. 69.181.249.92 +New shell image (kind of) Hi, Invertzoo. I'm not sure the image is of any use to you, but just in case here it is::Image:Sea otter fith shells at Moss Landing.jpg. Best. +Assassination I've answered your concerns. Thank you for the review. +Avril Lavigne Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Please leave a comment at Talk:Avril Lavigne. +Little-known cultural figures If you have an interest in writing articles abt little-known cultural figures, try your hand at Raynor Heppenstall - a most remarkable writer. (Hope I spelled his name right.) +Gonna fuck you up You little bitch. 86.178.140.114 +2. Updated this section to be more reflective of their brand of nomadic lifestyle. Still working on one remaining item under living arrangements: Yellow Woman joining Owl Woman in the fort 3. Updated the information about Big Timbers. 4. The article was reorganized to distinct background and biography section, and generally within chronological order within those sections. 5. I'm less concerned about emphasis being taken away from Owl Woman now that there's a separate biograhy section - and don't think it's necessary now to move any information to the William Bent article, but it may be helpful to introduce some of the key points to the Bent and/or Bent's Fort article. Bent's article, for instance is quite short in comparison. More to come. +It is not in a sub cat of British laws. +on the server Farstriders. +I dont understand how to talk back but my edit of the diary off the dead was piss funny ! +I totally understand. If you ever become interested, drop me an e-mail. Best, +The image of the Akins coat of arms is an accurate representation of the coat of arms on the 1785 tombstone of Thomas Akins - the crest, motto, supporters and charges are all consistant with the depiction executed 225 years ago.97.82.45.48 +Thanks... This Mahesh nonsense has taken up more of my time than I could have possibly imagined. I am about to weigh in on the ban proposal and see this ended once and for all. +"Welcome, Devilishqueen! I'm glad you've decided to join us - this is a great project. We do have a lot of users, and are currently working on articles, so things can be a little intimidating! Don't worry - we love to help out, and we'll try our best to make your stay here as comfortable as possible. Here are a few links I found helpful when I first arrived here. Be Bold! Don't let grumpy users scare you off Meet other new users Policies, guidelines, and rules How to edit a page and write a great article A handy tutorial, and a picture tutorial Writing well Learn from others Play nicely with others Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! Tell us about you To get adopted by a more experienced Wikipedian, you could add the words {{Adoptme}} to your user page. To read more about it, go here. You should sign your name on talk pages, discussions and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. Also, if you don't want to jump right into editing articles right now, why not check out the sandbox? Feel free to make test edits there. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian - I definitely do. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or problems, leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll try my best to help. Otherwise, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. We hope you stick around, and make sure you enjoy yourself! Cheers, etalk? " +REDIRECT Talk:Office of the Inspector General of the Government of Puerto Rico +cholans never had title thevar Thevar is a backward caste in India. Raja raja chola never had title thevar. His real name is Arunmozhi varman. http://books.google.com/books?id=T5J6GKvGbmMC&pg;=PA44&dq;=raja+raja+cholan&hl;=en#v=onepage&q;=apogee%20&f;=false Encyclopedia of architectural and engineering feats By Donald Langmead, Christine GarnautTake our survey New! page 44 please dont promote any caste +Could you please specify the licence of the photos you download on the server, so if there are following the GNU or CC licence, users from other wikipedia could use them to illustrate articles in other languages. Consider also download them on the Commons. 09:45, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC) +It depends on what you mean by monsters. If you are talking about all of the monster that were sent and destroyed in a single episode that would probabally be considered too much trivia. If that is does it should only cover the main villain, the primary minions and only other monsters if they had a significant effect on the plot.76.66.180.54 +Cant you just remove the logo and the sponsorship without changing the design? I wont revert it but I still like to see the actual jersey designs. +Interesting article You might be interested in this: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-04/Op-ed. +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, PGHolbrook! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —EncMstr (talk) {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats +" And can you explain why you reverted York, since it uses the ""settlement"" template, so my edit did not, as you subsequently claimed, ""break the formatting"".? " +" With respect, to say ""Specifically, it's not very objective"" is not to be at all specific. I can't tell if you think the page is biased in favor of its subject, or against him! So, how about really being specific? Yeah, unless some specific discussion is taking place, the tag should be removed. And, btw, ""obviously, more information...will come out as the campaign develops"" is not an argument supporting the claim of non-neutrality. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We objectively compile the sources that are available now. If more information does come out (in reliable sources), then (and only then) could it be included here. Anticipating the possibility of such is not a reason to argue this article isn't neutral. TalkContribs Is he really Catholic? " +MORON! The USA has only 5% of the worlds population - the OTHER 95% use METRIC exclusively - and most of this is in imperial measurements..... DUMB FUCKING AMERICAN. +I have done the table. I listed the book separately and then there is one reference to the book inline. I was possibly expecting more than one reference to the book. I will work on correcting the references. The first two refs are explanations, rather than citations. I can take suggestions on how to do that better? +Another unblock request +" That is partially true, but you also made it say ""Lebanon Golan Heights"" in this edit where it had said ""between Lebanon and the Israeli-occupied area of the Golan Heights"". You first removed one part what made sense and then removed the rest when it no longer made sense. nableezy - " +Hectorine, That was the opinion taken from a greek scholar, it also repeat the greek thesis therefore you cant claim it to be positively turkish biased and im now putting it again if you have any resentment first write in here, not destroy what i wrote in the article for gods sake.. +" I'd tone down that response a bit. The Morning Star can be a reliable source, but not for the assessment of the political orientation of an organisation like the EDL, certainly not without other sources TALK " +I removed some Unreferenced and Non Neutral lines. (t • c) +i.e. the skeptics do their part and the Connolley Communists ruthlessly do theirs. +. The obvious mistake in the inadequate use of “prosecute” in the translation of the French Rabbinate can be analysed as an unconscious confession and denunciation of the falsification committed by the rabbinical ancestors. TABFor when he dictates his Commandments, the Eternal does not play with double meanings. Then here on the Sinai, the historical context is that of abandonment of circumcision until Gilgal. Therefore, only the bad faith of the fanatic victims of circumcision could twist the text in a misinterpretation that nobody should ever have imagined. For in order to restore circumcision, the rabbis were compelled to conceal the veritable meaning of the Second Com-mandment through falsifying the sense of the most sacred text of the Torah since directly written by God. The manipulation of the faithful is obvious. The sole attenuating circumstance would be pathological denial of the reality of the meaning of the Second Commandment, due to blind faith in Abraham’s commandment and to the deep psychological trauma its implementation provokes. It is indeed high time to put an end to it. TABBesides, it is possible to word a hypothesis about the two versions of the Second Commandment, that which forbids circumcision and that which does not mention it. Until today, the authenticity of the Book of Deuteronomy has been considered warranted by the fact that the manuscript was found again buried in the temple of Jerusalem at the return from the exile in Babylon. But it is impossible that God should have varied in his formulation of the Ten Commandments; the Levite rabbis varied, not God. The redaction of the book of Deuteronomy has certainly been altered, truncated from the ban of circumcision. One must think that the discovery in the temple was a whole performance intended to warrant the return to circumcision. For the rabbis only knew the book of Deuteronomy, a book of rules of boring reading whilst the book of the Exodus was well-known to the people; it was the source of religious education and it was impossible to falsify it, only its interpretation could be changed. The version of the Book of the Exodus is both the authentic version and the one written at the intention of Nebuchadnezzar. Indeed, at the time of captivity, those who obeyed the divine will to respect the human body were likely still numerous. The Jews were divided about this point and the version of the Exodus enabled the rabbis to explain the fact to Nebuchadnezzar, while distinguishing the Jews from the Egyptians in order to avoid slaughter. The version of the Book of Deuteronomy was made up at the return from exile in order to warrant the new orthodox interpretation of the Second commandment of the Book of the Exodus. TABAbolishing the commandment of Abraham, the Second Commandment makes the right to physical integrity the first of the rights of man. One can even think that in the Third Commandment that comes right after this condemnation of circumcision: “You will not invoke the name of the Eternal your God to support lie...” (20: 7, French Rabbinate), Moses reproaches Abraham for having perjured saying that God would have ascribed him circumcision. A shrewd reader of the Bible, Mohammed took up this accusation in verses 4: 118-119 of the Koran (see below). For if God ever ordered Abraham circumcision, he forbade Moses to do it. Either it was not the same God or he changed his mind between both Alliances, or still Abraham lied and no God ever ordered circumcision. The Book of the Deuteronomy confirms that God did not impose circumcision to Moses +The video of the french show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-doAmxrKouI +My French is a little rusty, but I'd be happy to lend a hand here. Is there anything in particular from the UN article, or Google's machine-translation, that you feel might be incomplete / misleading? Are you planning to use other francophone sources? Feel free to take this to the article's talkpage if you don't want to bore Kudpung any longer. +also changed 'murder', because there's a great many crimes distinct from murder that result in a dead victim. dangerous driving, criminal negligence, etc. +Are Jews so intolerant of other faiths? Appreciating that this page is under vandal attack, I must ask since someone - Slrubenstein - undid a very minor edit (a single word) where I inserted that Judaism influenced my own religion - Brahmoism. I do not claim that Judaism is influenced *by* Brahmoism in any way, but wanted to acknowledge that a great old religion Judaism influenced the development of a relatively new World religion - even if in a small way. I specified in the title to my edit the similarities we perceive in the first 5 Maimonindes principles to our own God. Our founder Ram Mohan Roy studied Judaism and knew the Hebrew language. I hope that some people here will read our story Brahmo to see if there is any influence. +he sucks Sceptre's cock +It is pretty obvious to me what will remain, most trauma med, and nutritional med eg vitamin C for heart disease , drug addiction infections , cot-death . All of the pharma med for degenerative disease needs burying. Herbal medicine is as effective as nutritional, eg cayenne pepper will do what vitamin C does for heart disease. Vaccines need burying as well, it is easy to prove smallpox vaccine was 100% useless, and that is the one the rest sit upon. Most of the medical articles here are POV, especially the vaccine and vaccine disease ones. The medical editors here have unlimited power, and they deleted my sensible Vaccine critics page and merged it into the perjorative named Anti-vaccinationists. Which kind of proves my point, quite apart from the attempt to delete by merger about 5 of my pages, eg National Anti-Vaccination League. +"Just for the insiders: Effendi means ""Mr"" in Turkish -> Try reading the name backwards: Mr Oguz Tatari... And although I didn't know about the tunnels below the market square in Weimar, it is relieving to know that the City of Weimar is so incredibly interested in measuring the impact of tourists marching across the square... " +" Archont Petar and Petar Gojniković are two different people. Archont Petar was born in ca. 930. Petar Gojniković was born much earlier. Read this line from the House of Vlastimirović article: ""Knez Petar Gojniković (son of Gojnik, grandson of Vlastimir), born ca. 870, ruled 892/3-917/8, captured by Bulgarians, died in captivity. "" Those dates are nowhere close to of Archont Petar's. All I know for a fact is that Archont Petar died either during or after the 970s. So, please, don't put false facts in an article unless you do some research. Also, Archont Petar is also called Predimir and in some sources, I am finding the use of Predimir rather than Petar for Archont Petar. This should help. " +BLOCK THIS USER FROM WIKIPEDIA RIGHT NOW! HE IS VANDALIZING US! +Bare Behind Bars? You gave me a level 2 warning, what the fuck is that all about... You one of these power drunk admins? +I personally feel that the links should remain on the page. People come to this page for information when their FLV files do not play properly. +" ""I suggest you take some time to think about what you've done."" LOL. Will do. I'll spend seconds upon seconds dwelling on it. BTW, I never got ""warnings"". You escalated this situation because you are a cry baby. Most adults wouldn't have felt the need to go off crying because someone said ""don't be snitty"". - " +" No. Nothing in this article means anything. None of this is information that will ever be needed by anyone. Most of it is not information at all, but opinions. For one, Chicago is not the ""second city"" of America, if that even means anything. If the ""first city"" is New York, the second is either Washington, D.C., or Los Angeles. If D.C. is the first city, the second is New York. ""Second City"" refers to Chicago being rebuilt. This article should be deleted. 128.211.198.168 " +Well that is your opinion, and we should not be coerced into following it. UTCs are not free schools, they are not set up by parents. Soem free schools are actually a successor to a previous state secondary school and you never know, the next Education Secretary (probably Stephen Twigg) may allow existing state schools to become UTcs, so we cannot make assumptions like that. The point is, is that UTCs have autonomy. There is a consensus on this page that the mention of free schools is irrelevant and should be removed. +You are merely speculating. +You still seem to be intent on getting 'your way' on the page, despite it's errors in format, style, and grammar. I suggest you read this essay WP:OWN, and learn a little about Wikipedia. Thank You. +July 2013 (UTC)FrankSanello 19:36, 19 +"I rated this article 'stub class' not because it's the streotypical stub, but it doesn't really describe anything. What did Szigeti have to overcome to be such an important phyicist? Was he shunned from the 'we belive in faith and not science' community? What did he work on besides lightbulbs? Did he discover or invent anything? Did he run through the streets naked shouting ""Eureka!"" afterward? I'm getting carried away, but I think you get my point. " +My apologies. I have replied thereat. +In capitalism, the private sector takes care of the entrepreneurial function not the state. +Backmarkers! Somebody get these losers of the track! +Get the hell off my page idiot! +Where does Eagle Forum support Dominionism? For this to be useful, it should have some quote from Eagle Forum or from a reliable source that documents Eagle Forum support for Dominionism. But none of the references actually says that Eagle Forum has any Dominionist views. None of them is an objective source. And none of them actually criticizes some Eagle Forum view. TheocracyWatch quotes Glenn Scherer saying that Eagle Forum has rated some US Senators differently from environmentalist groups. Mother Jones said that Eagle Forum has supported a Republican group, and some of those Republicans had once supported Pat Robertson. That is very far removed from Eagle Forum supporting Dominionism. If Eagle Forum says that environmentalism is contrary to the Bible, or if Eagle Forum supported Pat Robertson for president, then those things might be notable and criticism of those views might be notable. But I cannot find anything like that in any of the references. Unless someone finds some better references, the paragraph should be removed. +" If matches , then remove . That would probably cover 99% of cases. {talk / contribs / physics / books} " +" Thank you for your response. You wrote: ""WP:MOSDAB deals specifically with, and shows several examples of, dabbing topics that are dealt with within other articles. It also discusses the criteria for the inclusion of red-linked entries."" Please provide the specific cites in each instance you allude to. Thank you. " +I've added the info. Hope this is okay. +thank you anon. I actually participated in that discussion, but the questions I'm now concerned about weren't addressed at the time. What concerns me now is that it's a self-published paper that relies heavily on hearsay, and makes no attempt to source things that are now being extracted from it as if they're facts. The one example I used is of great concern to me, but there are others on the Mason Remey and BUPC pages that are also contentious. I'm curious if it's merits are defendable beyond what's been cited above already, because it appears to only be a self-published paper and should only be used as such IMO. +REDIRECT Talk:Nothing But Love (disambiguation) +" Lying comes too easily to you Mr.Kannambadi Mr.Kannambadi, Do you know that your attitude is also an equal put off to those who wish to contribute genuinely to wikipedia, engage in healthy discussions and arguments? It is obvious that trusting you to be sincere in your approach and thinking you to be respectful of fellow contributors, I come up with explanation, sometimes or many a times in detail about historical events. Mind you the expression detailed in victory and silent about defeats was the one given not by me but by you to Nishkid. Also, do not resort to blatant lying on these pages (which you are clearly doing, first by saying that I have no sources - be realized that others can also read and write - and second, you are deliberately with malafide intentions creating a misimpression in wikipedia that I was banned for abusing and lack of sources. Be informed that it was neither of those reasons, because the first time I was blocked by Blinguen, it was completely and absolutely without any reason and the second time Blinguen came into my page, he did not express any objections to my contributions or changes to the Chola page, but first he commented that he is blocking me for he thought my contributions were my personal opinions and because he blocked me, he first of all did not engage in any discussions with me or try to explain as to how to make postings in the right manner (though I had indeed sourced the material properly but had not referenced the same) with the result that I got blocked before getting to discuss or even adding the necessary references or citations. But it is good, this way you are only exposing yourself displaying your lack of spirit of accommodation. I think I have put it as succinctly as one can, but what can you do, you will go on yapping I am writing detailed messages and creating confusion and what not? Do you remember the manner in which you so very contemptuously retorted upon my providing even the weblinks like visitchitradurga.com, unnecessarily resorting to instructing about keeping one’s patriotism under control…. That is the problem with people like you, when people give reasons you come up with such unhealthy excuses, when people want to discuss history instead of talking about sources and citations, you tell them to keep their patriotism under control or start alleging that what we try to contribute are devoid of sources or are straightaway our personal opinions. How wrong can you be? Well, that’s how some people like you are in this world!!! So your way is pretty clear; either avoid any discussion, remove postings and contributions or cry and complain behind the back, get people blocked and start blaming them by speaking and spreading all sorts of lies. The next time you want to speak about somone abusing, pl. recall with all vigour in what manner you retorted to Mahawiki - you told him first not to ""soil"" your talk page (what language and choice of words!!! and then you told him to go get the book by S.Kamat from a good library because you said such a library exists near your home..... if those are not insults, abusive manner of speaking, then what is.... but poor you, when I asked you to go and read Ancient India by either Roychowdhury or Sastri, you start looking out of the balcony!!!!!! tsk tsk.. Who is a vandal, Mr.Dinesh Kannambadi Do not accuse others of being vandals. Because Ninlil's intervention did not seem partial to you, you have resorted to getting the page 'blocked from edits in the garb of it being an FA category (howsoever inaccurate' by Yellowmonkey. Now whom should the question be asked: whether it is appropriate to mention the demise of the Cholas along with the demise of the Chalukyas, when it is clearly known to everyone that the Chalukyas first remained without a capital for over 30 years up to 1160/65 and finally demised in 1189/1192 AD with the Cholas lasting another 9 decades before being routed and finally eclipsed by the Pandiyans in 1279 AD?. This is simply because there is no relationship between the demise of the two kingdoms, the Cholas did not cause extinction of the Chalukyas or vice versa. The demise of the Chalukyas does not deserve mention in the Chola page even though the Cholas existed, but mainly because the Chalukyas were mainly consumed by their local rivals. Then what could be the reason for mentioning the demise of the Cholas in the page of the Chalukyas who demised many, many years before them? Can we also be enlightened under what rules of Wikipedia not understood by vandals, is this kind of editing and then awarding an article such as this riddled with holes is permissible? [ +wah wah Why not tell that communist faggot Jeffrey to fuck off and quit being a shit face? +Kabuki mask? Being that actors in kabuki only very rarely, if ever, wear masks, I am curious as to the origin of this kabuki mask, and its appearance, if a nice clear picture can be found. Is it a Noh mask? Is it a mask made to look like kabuki makeup? Or is it completely unrelated to actual kabuki performances, and only sort of looks like some stereotypical conception of what kabuki makeup looks like? Thank you. +Kenya Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. +Alas, for those who have a degree in CpE, we by default consider ourselves very different than CS or EE because many still do not know we exist. If you look at most engineering categories you will see CS and EE listed and CE not listed in many cases because many still do not recognize or realize what a CpE does that is different than CS or EE. Cmp is more specialized in areas of mainly digital systems hardware and software whilst EE is more in to. . . everything electrical (from the atomic level to power grids). Think of a discipline who straddles the fence between the fields of EE and CS (then slips off both ;-)). That's where CpE would unfortunately land. We need our own article to explain the difference. +November 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +Well like I said the sub heading was to resolve the problem or at least I thought so. Whitmore 8621 +Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll/Autoformatting_responses Regarding your comments in opposition of date autoformatting, I'd like to make it clear that date autoformatting and date autolinking are two different issues. They're currently interconnected by the use of the bracket syntax around dates, but a recently-installed patch also allows for date autoformatting without linking, and other proposed solutions similarly disentangle the two issues. +Oops Sorry, I was trying to restore my response that the complainer deleted. +I had no intention of vandalizing Wikipedia. While I may not share your views, I cherish this resource and will continue to do so regardless of how I feel I'm being treated. Just because I own the website doesn't mean I placed it there for advertisement; I'll have you know I make no profit from it, as it is strictly a hobby. That being said, I'm not one to get involved into fights with administrators or other members. I'm sure you believe what you're doing is in the interest of the encyclopedia, and for that reason I'm not going to judge your actions. I'm sorry if you feel my contributions to this website are harmful, and I'm indeed wrong, then I apologize for that too. But please understand that it is not my intention to vandalize this resource nor to cause aggression between members. Also, my mentioning of a moderator friend was in no way a threat. I would have had him take a look at what you're doing and interpret whether you're wrong or I'm wrong. +I don't think that the youtube link should be used as a source. There is a wide variety of secondary sources for this, for example (there are hundreds others): +" The Salon review does link to the only ever RS'ed use of ""Saint Pancake"", which was still seen as insufficient evidence by the consensus at the time to include the reference. I doubt there's an interest in reviewing that issue, which has been dormant for years but the discussions are extant in the archives of this talk page. " +" Bedford says: ""Jimbo Wales arbitrarily removed my sysop bit in a prejudiced manner, and demanded I grovel to him"" Jimmy, if I grovel in his place, will you grant me sysop? In any case, I will be greatly disappointed if ""Wrestling entertainment is awful and does not belong on Wikipedia's front page"" isn't in ArbCom's findings of fact. ☯    " +" Comments such as ""U ANNOYIN BIITCH.. WHY U KEEP ON REVERTIN WAT I JUS DID? SMH LOSER ASS CRACKA WHO WANNA BE PUERTO RICAN"" and ""YOU ARE A CRACKA A55 BiiTCH"" are completely beyond the pale here. Don't do it again. " +Argentina Clown fans are putting his goals of no comeptitive friendlies and qualifiers in argentina.. he has not scored 9 in 2012.. remove immediately +Dunno who the fuck you are, but evidently you completely misunderstood the situation. Don't post messages if you haven't got a fucking clue what's going on. 200.120.210.115 +":::Now how come Holmes, a half-Jamaican born citizen of the UK, is considered more ""British"" and ""notable"" than say, Margaret Thatcher? What a load of crap. Admit it: this is a PC reflection and nothing else. I could neeeeevvvvver move to Africa or Asia, marry, have children and expect my Gold-medalling athlete children to get posted on a webpage about the Chinese and Africans. It is simply absurd. We are not allowed an identity, everyone else is. And of course, we have Mr. Authoritarian Snowded arguing that anyone who tries to remove Holmes from the article, despite numerous numerous compaints, is a vandal. And he shows his disease when he for some reason feels it is necessary to blab on about ""ohh, we all came from africa"" or ""oh, our ancestors should not have came to their blands blah blah blah""...gee, I wonder what is influencing HIS decisions. I'd never donate money to this propaganda machine that is Wikipedia. God save Britain from its own self-implosion. - H. Montgomery " +Correction: to get the crest accepted by Wikipedia, you don't need to have it on more than one page. In fact, for most fair use (i.e. copyrighted) images, chances are that they can only be fairly used on one page. What you need is a good reason to use it: the official logo of a company, institution, ... is acceptable if that is a usual way of identifying the institution. You can e.g. see the fair use rationale of the Nike logo here. +Motion to ask more questions on those who refuse to answer It is clear to me that this dicussion is clearly not getting answered when the Adminstrator asked to use Talkpages and questions are being ignored about Oxford University as the first English speaking university or instition. For example user has not provided a single source of fact but objects and comments disagreement only. What is this? Use the talkpages qand get ignored. This discussion remains a question of matter on the facts of Oxford University being the first English speaking institution vs. the oldest speaking university. +" You ""proved"" nothing at BLP/N other than to harm your own position. I think you should read what others wrote there. Cheers. " +No, this is YOUR last warning. This is my talk page and I'll edit what I please on this page. You clearly haven't a clue what you're doing, A520. Your activities will be reported if you do not refrain from them. +Heh. That's exactly what I was trying to do. COMINTERN is at least as accurate as Communist International. Wikipedia rules are for everyone. - (Talk) 01:55, 2004 Oct 6 (UTC) +I am not the only one who finds the article too ridiculous and trivia to be included. +" Calamitybrook, you might read some of the many, many responses made over time about these issues. You might consider wp:dispute resolution or wp:RfC to gather support for your position. However, your abusive behaviour is not likely to draw much in the way of help: see again, guidance on your talk page, this talk page, wp:COIN, wp:WQA. Please follow it.- Sinneed " +youre pretty ugly for a gay anime fan +" The whole ""(Note: All of this section to this point is from"" bullshit should be fixed. First of all this belongs in the footnotes, plus missing parenthesis. Also, needs more sources. 2A00:1028:9197:48F6:443B:32DB:5C06:458A " +I can tell you that Intangible is right on this point. Gerolf and the fellow posters do not know what neocons are. However, it is always nice for a party accused of racism to try to connect with a more moderate group like the neocons, and it is also nice for a left-wing newspaper to connect a racist group with a main movement in the United States. So, I will look up the interview with Paul Beliën in which he cleary denies any link or connection with the USA and the Vlaams Belang. (and Beliën is a credible source here) +" Defenestration It was previously reported here (and elsewhere online) that every episode of the show featured ""defenestration of some kind or other"", which isn't true. Episodes often feature characters jumping out of windows under varying degrees of duress, but for example, in the episode ""They Eat Horses, Don't They?"" the nearest anyone comes is Fraser leaning out of a window to talk to someone on the street." +Assuming the 'artillery bunker' was on a small hill on the shore of the Serebryanyi Stream then Finnish sources likely agree with that part of the statement statement (hill is called 'public school hill'). Another relevant map: http://digi.narc.fi/digi/view.ka?kuid=4961514 p.592, '11.K:n alkuperäinen tavoite' (original objective of 11th Company) is the stream (Serebryanyi) and '11.K:n uusi tavoite' (new objective of 11th Company) that includes the 'public school hill'. From same document (online version) p. 579-580 (which are also p. 28-29 of III/JR6 war diary - same as 3rd Battalion of 6th Infantry Regiment) - 4.9. ...Regiment's commander gave the order to advance to the stream 1/2 km north of N. Beloostrov in the direction of Aleksandrovka0900 Stiff resistance but the objective was reached by 1100 with support of the artillery and infantry heavy weapons. At this time it was noticed that a small hill (referred to in the source as 'public school hill') just south of the stream dominated the nearby areas and had to be taken as well.1500 New objective taken. From same source, order by the commander of the 18th Division - http://digi.narc.fi/digi/view.ka?kuid=4961148 (p. 206-207) defines the front line on 4 September 1941 after that attack by the III/JR6 as follows: 3. Our regiment (excluding I/JR6) mans the 'Aleksandrovka section' (of the front line)... ...Edge on the right: Begins from Rajajoki (River Sestra) at roughly 1 km north of the railroad bridge and following the stream east from there... So according to both to the war diary of the Finnish battalion (3rd Battalion of the 6th Infantry Regiment) responsible for the direction just north of N. Beloostrov and according to the war diary of its' parent unit, or the 6th Infantry Regiment, the Finnish front lines did not run further to the south from the stream in question (Serebryanyi) than extending to cover the 'public school hill'. And run 1/2 to 1 km north of the N. Beloostrov on the 4 September 1941 following the Finnish attacks. - +How the fuck did you do that. Damn ur fast. You must get a shitload of ass. +Sorry coffee break, and?126.12.157.168 +Anti American You are an Anti American who hates Americans / USA. Is that not wrong? If you're trying to get a point across by using Wikipedia, anti Americanism won't help. +== Headline text Bold text == hey pplz talk to meMedia:Example.ogg +John, please see this at my Talk page. Cheers. +Seriously... Do you really have nothing better to do than try to get stuff deleted from Wikipedia? +The Game (mind game) +Prin has reverted the article again without bothering to discuss. All links to songs, trailers, Telugu filmography, whole paragraphs are lost now. Thank You! +" Nor is wikipedia here for your opinion on the Lions. p.s. It's ""notable"" by the way." +|listas = Bergman, Eva +" Thanks Thanks Kyoko! Wow it's been a while since we've talked. Just a recent deletion discussing and another one before it make me kind of feel like I'm making the wrong impression on people. I dunno. I do like to consider myself a deletionist but not in the negative sense. Adding rampant to it makes it clear that that's not how I want to come across. But anyway, it's good to know you're still here. Do you have my page watchlisted? If so, wow. Thanks. On this note, how are you? Everything good? Day349 " +Counting to 100 The next time you count to 100, note that 102 does not appear on the way. The earlier version documents the position precisely the way our guideline tells us to, as uncharted, with a footnote that indicates the position on the corresponding Bubbling Under chart.— +Ukrainian translation moves on like billy-o. In half an hour I've created a new page (translated from Russian involvement in the Syrian Civil War) which has been accepted by locals without any fuss. Pls note I that am not a native Ukrainian speaker. Still the MT with my minor corrections has passed through. I plan to finish translating this article into Ukrainian as a test. The real fun will start when I translate it into Russian, wich is my final goal of exersise. My home project is Russian but now I am blocked for adding too much unwanted stuff in the Syrian topic. The Blok expires next week, so please be prepared for more questions by then. Cheers and many thanks. +I think the reviewers all missed the note above explaining that this won't be a stand-alone Wikipedia page - instead its Vancouver-specific material will be added to the existing Daylighting (streams) page. The existing Daylighting (streams) page has an excessively long section about projects in Seattle. If you have time you might want to edit this section down, so it's about the same length as your Vancouver entry. You could also make any other improvements you like to this page. In future you'll probably find that other editors have shortened both the Seattle and Vancouver sections. +Greetings Your attempt to silence the editor of ReadWriteWeb is being discussed on Wikipedia Review. +Yes, my preferences, browsing, supress banner, and he's gone for another year, yey! +raise it as their own. Your mother is so fat, she thinks a balanced meal is a ham in each hand. Your mother is so fat, when she sings - it's over! +Yes I said FA, not GA. +" File:Breasts.jpg Nominated for Deletion An image used in this article, File:Breasts.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot File:Breast.svg Nominated for Deletion An image used in this article, File:Breast.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot Point-of-view pushing re: ""augmentation"" The use of the loaded, entirely positive word ""augment[ation]"" in this article is an obvious and blatant violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Like ""breast enhancement"", and ""aesthetic mammoplasty"", the phrase ""breast augmentation"" is a plastic surgery industry buzzword and constitutes clearly promotional spin-doctoring. This article needs to use more neutral, purely descriptive terminology like ""breast enlargement"", ""cosmetic mammoplasty"", ""voluntary mammoplasty"", etc., without implying any value judgment pro or con (and there are many with ""con"" views on this topic, both male and female, for a number of reasons ranging from medical and psychological to aesthetic and religious; this article inappropriately minimizes this fact in favor of plastic surgery marketing). — '''''' Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. " +. But if you bring yourself to, please add references to this article which improve it, and conform to your idea of a good article. That would be a decent and kind thing to do +" Orphaned non-free image (Image:MatrixAPU.jpg) ''' Thanks for uploading Image:MatrixAPU.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. zzuuzz (talk) " +" Which 2005 article? I wonder if it's the technical physical chemistry definition of poor/good solvent for polymer molecules. Water is considered a ""poor solvent"" technically for proteins, but this is a good thing, because it allows proteins to collapse into definite structures. talk " +" (UTC) I think it's important to point out that it wasn't just Taoists who were interested in ""Qi."" It is every bit as much a Confucian concept too. 03:28, 15 January 2010" +ASSHOLE! I just read this article, and man, was Hitler an asshole! +" on the Creator The demiurge is an expression of philosophy, in that it is a Greek or Hellenistic cultural concept. This means that the Demiurge is a cultural concept from the Greeks who did not believe in the empirical existence of nothingness as non-substantive (ex-nihilo). They treated nothingness as a substance called aether. The Greeks as pagans and pagan philosophers did not believe that you can get nothing from something therefore the creator had to create from ""something"". Plato it was the good, Aristotle it was energy, Plotinus it was force. These are ontological noema that create consciousness in humans. This arises from the unique essence of Greek or Hellenistic philsophy treating the natural (physic) and supernatural (metaphysic) as extensions of human consciousness. So everything that can be talked about or experienced stems from human consciousness and therefore must be expressed from a anthropomorphic perspective. God or Gods can not be anything outside of human. That's why Zeus and the Gods are flawed as their flaws reflect in man and mankinds flaws reflect in them. The demiurge as a phrase is creator and nothing can be created but in the way that mankind creates. The Greek Orthodox Christian God is not relatiable to the Actus et potentia as the Roman Catholic God since, God in essence is not action or inaction or potential nor inpotential this would make God's being, essence or substance comprehenisible and that then is not the Ortohodox Christian God. The Christian God is not one (the monad) or unity according to St Dionysus the Areopagite. Orthodox Christianity did not have the same God therefore the ""concept of God"" uses and has familiar language (between Hellenstic Greek and Byzantine Greek) but in essence, substance is a different concept of God. In Greek Orthodox Christianity (which Iamblichus kinda tried to graft into Neoplatonism after the fact) God is in and outside the Universe. God is made up of a substance that is beyond substance since God's consciousness ontologically is hyper-being. Meaning that God as a substance can not be detected nor contained. Now this was dependent on the concept of hypostasis, immanence or existence (cataphatic). The Pagan philosophical God was a detectable substance that all things derive from and reduced to. The Orthodox Christian God is a hyper substance that is not empirically detectable. Mankind has to be altered in order to detect it. Since the God in Greek Orthodox Christianity in his trinitarian completeness (uncreatedness) does not have the same consciousness as mankind, did not share mankinds consciousness until he became a human being AKA Jesus Christ. The reverse is only true in Philosophy since in Orthodox Christianity God as a whole has a consciousness which is completely unrelatable to mankind. Philosophy God and mankind have the same consciousness and Roman Catholicism and Protestantism treat God ontologically very much as modalistic (like Sabellianism) which creates also a different consciousness. Orthodox Christianity also rejects this as anthropomorphic-izing the Christian God, which can only come from not actually having experiencing the Christian God (theoria) and only experiencing the template in your brain or intrinsic God of philosophy. " +Brian leet tran A tag has been placed on Brian leet tran, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nawab_Faizunnesa_Government_Girls%27_High_School No more warning now just action +" I would also point out that it seems strange for an admin to ""side"" with an anonymous editor whose only edits are to remove content from this article. The text isn't controversial, is referenced and it's removal is only on the basis of it suiting the other user who could actually be just about anyone. 92.8.29.174 " +Jill Kristin McCormick is a fictional character made up mostly by Vedder himself and materially developed by Pearl Jam's PR machinery Vanderberg Communications managed by Nicole Vanderberg. The fact that McCormick's birth date was changed can prove a point that data for this article is arbitrarily written with no real verifiable data/source or document to support it. The person who poses for this personality is actually named Kathy Davis, a cousin of Eddie Vedder's, who also pretends to be his spouse but is actually the girlfriend of Pearl Jam fan club manager Tim Bierman. Also one needs to check the information on her children. They are not Vedder's but Bierman's. No reliable source supports the claim that Vedder is actually the father. This therefore makes the all of the information/details on this person with regards to this article questionable. +" I have had a clean record for many years, with over 5,000 edits; often I have served as a mediator on some very contentious issues and in doing so have been praised by both sides of such issues (see barnstars here: ). I'm not perfect, and I have lost my cool a bit in response to a provocation. I did depersonalize the comment for which I was blocked prior to the block. Here is the admission that his post that I responded to was a provocation: ""I was being fascious, just yanking your chain Fasutian. Nobody in my profession uses this test not because we couldn't but because we have no need for it."" (talk · contribs I was warned that I may be blocked for more comments and I did comment in a personal way - but again, I then depersonalized it. I will not engage in such behavior now. I would like to make edits on other articles and participate in a civilized discussion and would prefer that my record not be tarnished by this mistake. " +Structure diagram- i think this is a joke Surely the structure should not include a face (oval shape with two eyes) should it? +Would Duck Hunt Wii be an appropriate redirect for Wii Play? Wii Play contains the Duck Hunt demo from E3 2006 (which is why the Duck Hunt Wii article was originally created). If so I would like it's history undeleted (& possibly the talk page history too). I would also like the history of Mario party 8 undeleted. +" Your submission at Articles for creation Hubbard Free Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! " +Penny candy has been redirected to Bulk confectionery, which seems American in tone. Also, some candies listed as penny candies are more bulk. If someone with a UK slant could help, there could be 3 sections - bulk, penny and pick 'n' mix. Together, these might be worth keeping. +" Jc3s5h, I have undone your edit because it presents the information falsely. The previous definition was too brief in my opinion but at least it wasn't inaccurate. The zodiac is an ecliptic-based frame of astronomical refrence that is used to define celestial latitude and longitude. What you have written above shows misunderstanding and lack of knowledge so if you want to propose an amendment based on sources, it would be a good idea to discuss here first with details of the sources for verification. Please present a page number and not just a book so we can see why you are making the assumptions you are making. It is my intention to correct the information on the zodiac page, BTW, before worrying too much about what this page says, but what is presented here should not be deliberately false or misleading. Δ talk " +" Parmo Army Could you give me a hand finding out places outside of the north east that serve the ""Parmo"" ) be a big help. Thanks Wb." +No dice - All the sound samples available are also copyrighted. +Lol. Instead of spamming me a long winded response, why don't you take my advice and explain your edit. +April 2010 (UTC) Please ban Sennen goroshi from wikipedia for breaching rules bu editing every single Korean articles under his own POV, he always argued article should be balance but he's the real troll who edits with his personal opinions. Why wikipedia is helping troll like Sennen goroshi? does Sennen goroshi funds wikipedia?Korsentry 14:21, 13 +London Do you considered London to be the most populated city in the EU? If not then which do you consider to be? +No follow the rules loser +So who decides what is silly and what isn't? I think you're objections are silly. +I appreciate the efforts, often I'm not sure if people are aware of the difference, hurried, or just neglectful. +"Indeed. ""Panzer"" = armour. A tank is a ""Panzerkampfwagen"" (armoured fighting-vehicle), but is abbreviated to ""Panzer"", or written as ""PzKpfw"". The German for 'panther' is, 'der Panther/ Panter'. 217.44.24.125 Al (UK) " +Alex, please provide evidence that the Romanian and Hungarian names are translations of the Latin one. Anyway, I don't feel necessary that those long tables are in the article, it was originally included becase you attacked me by claiming that I am magyarizing the town +Get him out of here, and I will get past this, I assure you, completely past Wikipedia. But to have him come and taunt me is absurd and cruel. +" The article in the ""Rolling Stone"" of 1970 is already mentioned in the External Links in the article on Hunter." +Error can somone please move this to original (before my edits to Swedish Resistance Movement)? +Could you please make a list under my latest comments, of the points you have arguing why I'm misinterpreting policy, so I can address each one. Thanks, +" I asked about sources out of curiosity, not to undermine what you said. In a Jamaican context what you say is true - from what I cited (and some other reading) I would say that ""Taino"" is preferable to Arawak for the Greater Antilles because it is more specific in that context. Taino is used specifically for the Arawakan people of the northern Caribbean - so it is a subset of the Arawakan people (and thus not interchangeable). Taino could be considered a single ""tribe"" within the Arawakan language family. The Island Caribs were another, as were the Lokono of the mainland. The Arawakan language family is one of the largest in South America - Brazil, Peru, Bolivia and throughout the Caribbean. The term Taino is not, to my knowledge, used for groups outside of the northern Caribbean. The Arawakan people of Hispaniola and Puerto Rico had the most sophisticated cultures, the most powerful chiefdoms. As far as I can tell, it is to these groups (the ""classic Taino"") plus their related neighbours (the ""eastern Taino"" and the ""western Taino"") that they name Taino applied. The point is not the word as such, since it was probably not a word that they used for themselves except to proclaim themselves ""friendlies"" to the Spanish. There was a distinct culture of the northern Caribbean...before I looked it up I though the Lucayans of the Bahamas were not part of that group, but I was wrong. Words only work if they can be fit to real meaningful concepts. The term ""Igneri"" has been used for the ""Island Arawaks"" who preceded the Island Caribs in the Lesser Antilles. This group probably made up the basic substratum of the Island Carib population, and gave rise to the ""Kalinago"" (or women's language) of the Island Caribs. The men spoke either a Carib language or a Carib-based pidgin, but apparently it had a lot of Arawak words. The ""traditional"" view of the Island Caribs as interlopers has been severely questioned in recent times. One source separated out three theories of their origin. The traditional one (and the one I got in school, etc.) was the ""Carib replacement"" model - that the Caribs invaded and displaced the original Arawak population of the Lesser Antilles, and were spreading northward at the time of Spanish contact. Another one is the ""Arawak continuity"" model which says that the Arawaks of the Lesser Antilles acquired a Carib pidgin through trading with the Mainland Caribs. The third is a reticulate model in which Mainland Caribs moved into the Lesser Antilles and merged with the Arawak population in a model comparable to the Norman conquest of England. I got the impression that modern scholars leaned that way. One source cited seventeenth century documents that refer to two groups of ""Caribs"" in Grenada, the Galini (probably Kaliña/Karinya, or Mainland Caribs) and the Caraïbes (Island Caribs). In addition, contemporary sources refer to the Taino of the Greater Antilles fleeing Spanish massacres and joining the Island Caribs. In the Spanish period the Island Caribs changed from being enemies of the Puerto Rican Tainos to being their allies against the Spanish. (Main source: Raiders and Traders: Caraïbe Social and Political Networks at the Time of European Contact and Colonization in the Eastern Caribbean - Ann Cody Holdren, 1998, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA; McGinnis's dissertation - cited above - has a lot of quotes from Columbus's journals and from other contemporary sources). Arawak (or aruaca), as I mentioned, comes from aru which was the Lokono word for cassava flour. I am not a historian, just trying to do my best to see what the primary literature says. The use of the word Taino is standard for the Greater Antilles, but whether it is ""accurate"" is another matter altogether. McGinnis points out that Columbus was very selective in how he interpreted data - if you were hostile, then human limbs were proof you were Carib, but if you were friendly, then the heads he found in the village was funerary. Of course the whole idea of the origin of the Caribs is controvertial. But the traditional view is by no means accepted without question. That's what makes history so exciting these days. 23:40, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)" +" My population-related revert I have just reverted an edit by an anon who changed the part of the lead sentence that says Oakland is the eighth-largest city in California to say that it was the third-largest city. I reverted the edit because the source cited for the ""eighth-largest"" claim includes a list that clearly shows Oakland is the eighth-largest city in California by population. " +"==We need to add this statment to the MVP 2006 section== ""He is also the first player to win back-to-back MVPs without a championship or an appearance in the NBA Finals."" You tell me why not??? Why not??? We have him listed with all those other greats. They do not relate to the award either. This article is so POV, it is disgusting. " +Why would anyone use a lookback option? +Unprotecting Potential superpowers Hey, could you please unblock Potential superpowers. The dispute on the talk page has been resolved and a new improved, better sourced ediition has been created and is waiting to be added to the page. Full unprotection or semii-protection would both work well. There is simply no need for the protection, as things have simmered down. Thanks. +THIS IS TOTALLY PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC..THE SCYTHIANS HAVE A INDO-EUROPEAN ORIGIN..NOT SEMITIC..AND YOU IS A STUPID NIG*GER WITH VERY/BIG ENVY AGAINST WESTERN EURASIANS.. +grow up Get a life +I've heard enough. Now leave me alone. I got your point. Crucify me why don't you. +I agree with r-b j, they actually believe themselves to be great scientists. +Ww, that was fast. I wanted to check someformatting, When I went back to remove the link and page you had already gotten to it. I should have used to Sandbox. +Education I recommend you to get educated, btw: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYFNfW1-sM8 +I'd actually suggest WP:AN, I'd rather keep out of this one thanks ) TT(talk) +Quotes: it doesn't work like that Your quote does not stand a snowball in hell's chance of being added to wikipedia, I'm afraid. We collect encyclopedic content of note. Sadly, your quote is (until you achieve world domination, etc) not notable. I have added an Adoptme tag to your user page. That's the better way to find someone to adopt you. Good luck! (talk) +Yep, it was cut around 90 seconds. However it has been released uncut now. +This paid chitbag takes the crooked cake.http://neer-do-well-hall-of-infamey.blogspot.ca/ +Mine should be 100% correct because its basically a redrawing and reworking of a simpler diagram in 'Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th Ed.', by alberts et al. (Talk) +The talk page has been reattached to the article page 70.51.203.69 +SummerPhd, MarnetteD and several other editors suck enormous amounts of cock. They're faggot queer douchebags who go on a power trip because they're wikipedia editors...even though that means that they're doing nothing with their lives and still live in their mom's basements. What fucking losers. HAHAHA I already have another account who can edit semi-protected pages...they're just fighting a losing battle. Douchebags. +" At the very least, there are many sources that study the reflectance spectra of Munsell chips. One that is in the public domain is at . The server was awfully slow when I tried to access the links with the ASCII data files; I had better luck with ; click the squares for reflectance data. This website is cited in, for instance, Fernando Ayala, José F. Echávarri, Pilar Renet, and Angel I. Negueruela, ""Use of three tristimulus values from surface reflectance spectra to calculate the principal components for reconstructing these spectra by using only three eigenvectors,"" J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 2020-2026 (2006) (abstract: ; the article cites the website above as Ref. 24). One of the classic sources—also cited in the paper above—seems to be Kenneth L. Kelly, Kasson S. Gibson, and Dorothy Nickerson, ""Tristimulus specifications of the Munsell book of color from spectrophotometric measurements,"" J. Opt. Soc. Am. 33, 355-376 (1943) (abstract: ). The Kuehni book I mentioned above lists a bunch of other sources. You can browse it (""search inside""), if you have an amazon.com account (used at least once to purchase something from amazon.com itself), here: . Incidentally, I now realize that these sources may give enough information to settle the very question I posed. But to really settle it, I would first need the answer to the following: was I wrong in the identification of the Munsell's color in my initial posting? That is, What is the identity—in the Munsell system—of the Munsell color to which the Wikipedia article is referring? Is it in fact 5RP 5/12? Having realized my probable mistake above, now I don't understand something else. Look at this statement in the article: …professional artists, following Munsell color system… regard purple as being synonymous with the red-violet color shown at right, in order to clearly distinguish purple from violet… In what sense are artists supposed to be ""following Munsell"" here? Obviously not in nomenclature. Is it the case that the artists do use Munsell's colors in their work, but change the names (e.g. Munsell's purple → artist's violet, and Munsell's red-purple → artist's purple)? I'd rewrite this if I understood what is attempted to be said here. " +involved in Sam's template +SO WHAT IF I LOVE MICHAEL JACKSON@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@U GOT A PROBLEM WIT THAT (GEORGE BUSH) +"::Hey Nick. I just finished up some work on the ""Legacy"" section, and then opened the A-Class Review for Derrick (here). I still plan to expand the lead a bit more, but the body is all done so I figured the review can be opened now. Cheers, " +And you say I'm going to be reported but yet you already said I am being reported. +vandalism Er, got two messages come up when I visited the site about editing userpages or something. Sure as hell weren't me. What's going on? 90.220.37.70 +It's just too weasel-wordish, and the chimera example is pure original research. it gives the impression also that the argument that macroevolution is not falsifiable is even heard in the sciences. that's undue weight. several issues here. that's why I removed it. +Quoting Loremaster: In order to make sure you understand me +"Looking at your first link, there are immediate questions regarding its reliability, as it speaks of religious beliefs as if they were facts ""DECALOGUE (in patristic Gr. Se Kaoryos, sc. 131 1 6A03 or vop.oNo-La), another name for the biblical Ten Commandments, in Hebrew the Ten Words (Deut. iv. 13, x. 4; Ex. xxxiv. 28), written by God on the two tables of stone"" (bolding mine). And even that site agrees that ""In the narrative of Exodus the relation of the ""ten words"" of xxxiv. to the words spoken from Sinai, xx. 2-17, is not so clearly indicated, and it is generally agreed that the Pentateuch presents divergent and irreconcilable views of the Sinaitic covenant."" I simply don't see how you think that cite supports your views. " +That means u and v are in the interval from 0 to 2pi. I clarified that in the article, although this is rather standard math notation. +Suck it James! http://manson-haters.blogspot.com YOU will be featured here next asswipe! Trample on the rights or others until you cream your pants but it won't change a thing. I am above ALL of you! +Notability of Churchlands SATB Choral The article Churchlands SATB Choral has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Awyong J. +" Be nice. Thanks for your improvement to Roger Clemens. It's a good idea, though, to try to be calm and civil in your edit summaries. Saying, ""Are you serious? Learn up stats, rather than throwing in random numbers"" seems to go against Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Whoever made that mistake might feel insulted. It's possible, for instance, that those were his 2005 stats and the person accidentally typed 2006 instead of 2005. Or 2007 or any recent year, like that. " +Now I believe you are done Sophia, congrats. I will ping User:Ponyo and User:Anthony Bradbury, to see if we need to do anything more, or be told anything more. Is everything kosher, and Sophia is ready to be WP:BOLD in mainspace now? As I understand it, Phil her manager in the UK *is* still blocked, save from editing his own talkpage to discuss unblocking procedures. Due to tech-related difficulties with inability to type colons (perhaps he edits from a tablet with no physical keyboard?), and because he did some impersonation of Sophia and some creation of new usernames for evasion-and-or-socking, Phil may need to wait for the Usual Six Months prior to requesting an unblock of his User:Welshmusiclover account, should he wish to return to wikipedia and get himself back into wikipedian-in-good-standing status. I believe that Sophia can, if she so wishes, give Phil some pointers on the wiki-rules, and on the use of talkpages, and other such topics, which will immensely improve Phil's chances of getting his own username unblocked. But they should both read WP:MEATPUPPET very carefully, so that they don't cross the wiki-rules against socking and puppetry and making edits on behalf of other people. Sophia should exclusively use her own newly-cleansed user-account User:Sophia Giroux-Radisch, and not only should nobody else use it directly, nobody else should use it *indirectly* either. On the other reason for her old user-account and Phil's current user-account being blocked, Sophia should be aware at all times that wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion. This includes herself, her albums, her movies, and so on, plus also her other clients and her co-workers at rock Solid Talent Entertainment (not to mention the corporate entity itself), as well as her relatives and friends. She should remember the rules of WP:COI and WP:SPIP, and stick to making suggestions on the article-talkpages or in draftspace, if she ever wishes to see edits made, related to herself or her workplace. Admins, is this advice all correct, and is there any other advice that Sophia needs to hear, before she goes on her merry way? And also, I understand that it is customary to let cleansed-usernames tidy up their old userpages and their old usertalkpages, if they wish; can she archive all this info here into the page-edit-history, should she wish? Thanks for your help and guidance getting Sophia back up and working. 75.108.94.227 +RVs Dont' RV User Talk pages, it is against the rules. +Answer the questions I ask you directly. LOL! You are well-known for never doing that! LOL! Stop trolling Untwirl, he didn't say any of the things you allege he said. If you have cognitive difficulties in understanding what analogies, metaphors, and rhetorical arguments are, its not his problem, but yours. +Vote for manager thinks Uli Hoeness is the manager. I think Felix Magath is the manager. Let's vote for who the manager is. Felix Magath Support Uli Hoeness +":::There's a whole section in this article that talks about ""Under God"" being added to the pledge at a later date. Wikipedia isn't a discussion board for the opinion of historic interpretations, it's an organized scrapboard for the facts, and I feel the facts have been well-displayed.12.26.68.146 " +User is no longer a member of WikiPedia and due to personal circumstances wishes to have his privacy respected. +My name is Pinkadelica, a charming Texas girl, 22 years old. I am independent young escort based in Houston. I am joyful but discreet person, intelligent and sensual. I am extremely feminine with perfect curves and the charm to please a gentleman. I will. Pinkadelica +STOP REVERTING MY EDITS YOU CUNT +Something happened with the bandwith, i hope Simon (main admin) is going to fix that soon. +FIRST YOU MURDER JESUS. NOW YOU CRUCIFY THE PALESTINIANS AND PEOPLE OF DARFUR +In Other Media? I'm surprised to see nothing mentioning CoD:WaW in South Park's season finalle a week or so ago, is there a reason for that or is it that no one has gotten around to it yet? 69.19.14.40 +"Welcome! Hello, Punkrocker0817, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page The Sandbox, a place to test out Wikipedia's features. Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Please feel welcome to start your own pages, in addition to editing existing ones. If you create a page, and change your mind about it before any other user makes a significant edit to it, leave a on it so that it will be deleted. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Again, welcome! Od Mishehu " +albert einstine was a foorball player for the space aliens on jupiter. he was actually a homo in denial. he fell in love with his own dad at age 23 and later went on to take him on dates. einstine was a mad evil scientist that plotted to destroy the world but was murdered by hitler because he was a pain in the butt. +Algr, you are committing a fundamental fallacy here. You made reference to the fact that people make their computations on a calculator or computer, which, you correctly point out, does not use the system of real numbers. This has nothing to do with any preference for an alternative number system, and everything to do with the limitations of the underlying electronics. When engineers built their various systems of arithmetic, they were not promoting their's as superior, but rather theirs was intended to be used as a close approximation to a mainstream mathematical number system. The floating point and double precision floating point numbers are supposed to be approximately real numbers. The unsigned and signed integers are approximations for the actual integers. etc. +Template:Dominionism Hi Jossi. The Template:Dominionism TfD, on which you commented, has been closed with no consensus (default to keep). Although the TfD debate touched on several issues regarding the form the infobox should now take, much seems unresolved. I invite you to participate in further discussion on this topic. Thank you. (t/c) +" I thought that was what was meant but checked first thanks for swift reply. Talk " +Surely the NZB is a header itself. +Deleting false Info from my Wiki Page (but reappears?!) Hi Dragon Booster, This is Richa, and I keep a close watch on the content that goes up on my wiki page but after having removing untrue content several times, it has come to my attention that someone repeatedly puts them back up. Especially when it comes to my filmography, which I would know best, as i AM the primary source! Please help me in understanding how I can edit my page by removing false content (ie 2 films which I wish to REMOVE from my filmography as I am not doing them),and changing the main display pic. I am not sure about why I would have to give any citation for films im NOT doing...so simply removing the content and saving changes should technically be enough. Thanks and appreciate your response. Richa Gangopadhyay +Nice work with Garrus Vakarian I didn't read it to comment on it, but carry on. +Relations Do you think the Federal Republic of Aurelia has any notable relations? +Hans Freeman He was an accomplished scientist, yes. His bio is however is however gushing. At least in my opinion. Compare Alan M. Sargeson. +Hum What is wrong with my script? It still will not work. D.H. • (TextMe)•()•(MyWork)•(Escape) +VaNdAlIsM tee hee. You have been vandalized +REDIRECT Talk:Red brick universities +"This is a User talk archive page. If you modify it, you'll make Baby Jesus cry. Re: BMT Sea Beach Line Hey Eddie, this edit to BMT Sea Beach Line, replacing crossover switches with exicornt switches, comes from an IP address that you've done a lot of editing from. (In fact, all the edits from the IP appear to be yours. contribs) What is up with that? — I realized My mistake. I created a wiki on My computer and I wanted to import that version's text into My computer, but I realized I clicked Wikipedia's save buttion. Although it's reverted. I'd like You to delete that revison (delete the page and restore all the other revision except that one) You have the ability to do so. , Tuesday March 7 2006 at 18:07 I'm glad it was a mistake; I know you've been playing around with local wikis, so that makes sense to me. Hmm. I'd like to get some other admins' opinions on deleting entries from the history for this purpose; I'm not sure it's neccessary or prudent. Anybody else watching this page have an opinion? — ([[User talk:Bunchofgrapes|talk]]) I just don't want people to oppose Me on trivial matters like that, since any page can be reverted. I'm only human, after all. , Tuesday March 7 2006 at 18:17 I would agree with Bunchofgrapes that it is not neccesary to delete that edit. If you had started an edit war then that would be detrimental to your reputation. If you admit it is a mistake, and you do, then there is no problem. (Talk) Yeah, history deletions are a bad business to get into, really only appropriate for cases where Wikipedia might get into legal trouble or when personal information has been revealed. It's fine that you made a mistake, Eddie, don't sweat it. — Aha, here's the conversation. -) Good explanation, Bunchofgrapes. (talk) Well whatever You guys do, I have no further intent on discussing this subject further, as BMT Sea Beach Line was reverted and no further harm done. Let's move on now. , Wednesday March 8 2006 at 03:58 Barn star! Thank you! — | talk ]] Thanks! It will go nicely to replace one I lost a while back! — You lost a barnstar? Is that possible? — | talk Do you mean ""prerogative""? I believe that you are referring to ? She no longer edits using the library references because of her impudence; it may have been her although it may not have been. Either way, congrats! — | talk Ah, caught in a spelling error, the shame, the shame... Anyway, thanks again. — so wut well u no wut it wasnt me and im really never on this account so wut are u goin to do boot me off???!!!??? stfu man i didnt doo nothin its just cuz im black!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) 21:30, March 7, 2006 (UTC) We're all the same color on the inside. Peace out. — Are we? Nevertheless, we all bleed and its the same colour of red. Or is it? Don't those royals have blue blood?[[User +"::Found a couple of ways around it then. 1) Look in each chapter here or 2) download from Project Gutenberg the books onto my harddrive, then search. talk Roman History, Books I-III The History of Rome, Books 09 to 26 The History of Rome, Books 27 to 36 Livius.org: Livy " +and read these messages +What happened? I printed this article out on February 19, 2010, so I could read it. Tonight I went in to do some minor editing and saw that the original subheading 'Southern colonies' had been changed to 'Frontier' AND that most of the material had been deleted. I'm wondering because it seems to me the original material belongs in the article. +P.S. I never said you vandalize pages. +" How about recognizing that the citation isn't really one - and most certainly doesn't merit a section in the article? Seems to be in the ""desperation to make the source seem notable"" category " +" My Z! ) How are you doing, my dear Zeibura? How's the English summer treating you? ) Gosh, I've missed you lately, Z! I hope to get a little spare time to drop you an email... no promises tho, even tho I'm dying to! Love you sweetie. - " +" oh why dear johnny boy part one (again) do you want a fucking fight? what the shit is your problem ""ooh! he's personally attacking me"" grow up" +I'm aware of the process, thank you though ). +"::::Right here, POV pusher. Also Here. Zamfara state maintains an ""Islamic Unit"" similar to Saudi Arabia's ""Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice,"" otherwise known as the Muttawa religious police. One of its officials, Alhaji Bello Kuceri, defended their practice of raiding Christian quarters to enforce ""Islamic"" standards on the grounds that ""we are paid to do so, and anybody caught will face the wrath of the law."" Get it YET, Yuber? " +Douglas Schoen is not a Fox News employee. (talk) (contribs) +" LISa 2 Man this page is empty ah well left cleand up some of the artical but i really need that you whacth it when you have time. the rookie " +References for Richard Milton I think this is pretty much all the references on the internet for Richard Milton, theres probably more, but these are the ones that seem to be most popular. Some of these can be used for the article. Links for Richard Milton See second page down Review of Milton's Facts of Life Neo-Darwinism, Is it Time to Reconsider, Richard Milton Independent book review of Milton's book An article written by Milton himself Here is a negetive review from an evolutionist website of Milton's book Here is a review of Milton's book which is mixed. This reference is already on the article Shattering the myths of Darwinism Darwin Doesn't Work Here Anymore by Richard Milton Shattering the myths of Darwinism review Where Did We Come From? An Exploration of Different Theories of Evolution Description of Milton's book from a Christian organization You can also see here many books which mention Richard Milton +I'm not certain that Performance Studies fall within the scope of Anthropology. Most Performance Studies programs and departments are housed in schools of Arts or Communications. +Salm Shah Sahab Salm Iam Qadeer Mangrio hope u will fine .......... nice about rohri , i had also checked your site rohri.net very beutiful and infomative site. Regards, Qadeer Mangrio +Hi. There's no indication of how she's notable, and there are no references. I can't find any reliable references online about her either: just stuff on social media. +The alleged messages from the Blessed Mother repeat several times that all religions are paths to God and the Catholic Church is only one of them. This goes against established criteria that any apparition of Mary, angels, Jesus or whoever has to completely agree with the R.C. Church in all particulars before it can be approved by the R.C. Church. +The ref still points nowhere and the JED site is unsupported by any other source of which I'm aware. +please join me for Anthrocon 2010. I'm really into that stuff. I also live on Wales!! +Ahmadinejad is referring to the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia (CICA). http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8903171502 and he says orders, this is just translating getting people excited over nothing. We, the people who know the truth are in the business of Conspiracy FACT, and fact is, the establishment is conspiring (being complacent to the lying, like most of the mainstream and democrat leadership is) to tar and feather Iran in the world view and lying about Iran's nuclear capability, just like the Bush and Blair administrations conspired to lie to the world and to invade a nation and killed over 1 million civilians. +SGG SA Hi Excirial, recently you have overviewed a text submission on behalf of SGG SA (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Services_G%C3%A9n%C3%A9raux_de_Gestion&action;=edit&redlink;=1). See text below. Unfortunately you have considered it as not appropriated for wikipedia as it contains copyrights. May you please just tell me / or give me a concreat example of this on my submission please? I'd like to create a page which describs my companies activities. Thanks a lot for your help. SGG, stands for « Services Généraux de Gestion ». SGG Group/SGG is a leading administrative and financial services provider. It is a major player of the Luxembourg market since 1953. The group is active in the Netherlands through IMFC and ANT (established in 1896). SGG has developed a global expertise in the field of Fund Administration, Corporate and Family Office Services, to service the alternative asset fund industry, international companies, high net worth families and entrepreneurs. SGG is also active in tax compliance and financial engineering servicing for example securitization vehicles for banking clients. It employs 500 professionals worldwide. The latter deliver reliable accounting, reporting, tax, legal and administration/secretarial support in Luxembourg, the Netherlands and in 12 other jurisdictions. As a “PSF” (Professional of the Financial Sector), SGG is subject to the control of the CSSF(Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier), the authority supervising the Luxembourg financial sector, and to the supervision of the DNB(De Nederlandsche Bank), in the Netherlands. In today’s rapidly changing environment, SGG offers its know-how through client focused, multicultural and interdisciplinary teams. The aim is to provide institutional, corporate and private clients with the best service, in their own language and with the support of their chosen legal and tax advisors. SGG’s anchor shareholder is COBEPA (Compagnie Benelux de Participations), a Belgian diversified holding company concentrating its € 1,2 billion investments in leading European players. SGG’s remaining equity is held by its partners. Recent acquisitions: IMFC B.V. / FAcTS Services S.A./ ANT +Image copyright problem with Image:Rsjhnson.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Rsjhnson.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. +" They use the words ""potential effects"", ""could"", etc. the tone is very different and expresses an appropriate level of scientific uncertainty with a very detailed examination of climate, it's complexity, links, etc. the whole page needs to be revamped! Certainly the Wikipedia page is free. But if you're interested in maintaining a good page, especially on Global Warming, it should be longer than a page on the entire collection of pages related to Mars and all other planets combined -due to it's importance, and not seem such a matter of opinion and vengence against the right, or whatever it is the tone of the admins are directed towards. " +I'LL KILL YOU ALL!!!! +Howie Payne Hi Keith D I would like to protest the changes made by user 92.8.22.187 and subsequent locking of the page by yourself thus protecting his recent subbmissions I have reverted the changes revisions made by this user several times due to lack of references and dubious POV submissions. The user was contacted and referred via previous talk message pages to point out & explain this but despite this continued to revise the page without providing references for the changes submitted. As you have now locked the page with these incorrect/unreferenced submissions in place I would implore you to re evaluate the submissions made by user 92.8.22.187 and act accordingly. I will go into detail here in the hope it may help resolve some the issues with the edits submitted by user 92.8.22.187: I see no reason to now have 4 references to support the spelling of a name that has not been contested. - One of which is a pay site and another that contains a personal address! User 92.8.22.187 claims I have been changing the spelling of the name here despite his/her addition of references. A quick look will show I have been removing the references for matters outlined above but have not in any way changed the spelling of the name here. The reference to Payne's involvement in The Stands (5) has been changed from a full length interview with Payne about The Stands in a national publication (Designer Magazine) to review of a solo concert written 3 years after Payne's discontinuation of the group for a local fanzine that briefly introduces Payne as a former member of The Stands before reviewing a solo performance. Payne emigrating to US at age 13 - no reference Edgar Jones's commitment to Paul Weller being the reason for the break up of The Big Kids - No reference - Also Jones was no longer playing with Paul Weller at the time of The Big Kids break up (Winter 2001) The information regarding Pilgrim and Thomson's departure and the subsequent demise of the group as a result of this is wholly misleading - Pilgrim left The Stands in December - 2004 and was replaced by Graham Robinson in January 2005. The Stands then releaesed the single Do It Like You Like which entered the UK to 40 at no 26 and was used on the worldwide Revelon London Look campagihn featuring Kate Moss. The Stands then toured with Oasis during both their Europian tour. Luke Thompson left The Stands in June 2005 http://www.gigwise.com/news/6615/Luke-Thomson-Leaves-The-Stands and was replaced by Paul Molloy. The Stands released Horse Fabulous in July 2005 played Glastonbury - V Festival - T in the Park - an Oasis UK stadium tour - and a headline tour before Howie Payne released a statement to say he was discontinuing The Stands in Nov 2005. All of this plus the fact that the bands label, Echo records was dissolved by Chrysalis during August 2005 is available on The Stands dedicated wiki page. To sum this up as user 92.8.22.187 has done is totally miss-leading and not based in fact. Regarding Payne's solo career the new piece mentions Payne spending time in Texas and Los Angeles with neither relevance or reference. There is a further edit regarding Payne's name spelling and the submission implies there is a miss-spelling or changed spelling. As the only documents that are can decicivly prove the spelling of a persons birth name are Birth Certificate and Passport and none are provided here I will reserve judgement on this but I do think describing the spelling of Elliot (as here) as standard is ridiculous. There are at least popular spellings of the ame Elliott/Elliot/Eliot/Eliott/Elyott and it would seem the most popular is Elliott. I do not wish to appear to be pedantic regarding this but as this is typical of the caviler way user 92.8.22.187 has applied vague guesswork and then claimed them facts to the page in question and has accused me of changing his/her referenced submissions which is clearly not the case I hope that as a long standing contributor to wikipeidia you can see that my aim is to prevent this page being a false interpretations of events littered with unnecessary unreferenced/POV information. The previous page edition 01:30, 25 November 2012 has correct referenced information and I believe is a suitable and proper representation of events as per the information available at this point. Thank you for your attention to this matter. +" 1) I didn't say ""one short sentence would be appropriate"", I said ""so a small sentence on it is relevant"". 2) I accept that this point is correct, however, the article mentions that ""Creationist beliefs may be based on creationist theology, creation science, or a combination of both"" therefore making this criticism completely relevant to the article. Equally, the further criticism of 'creation science' could be applied more widely to creationism as a whole. I am referring here to the sentence, ""Science uses the scientific method to systematically comprehend reality as it is, whereas 'creation science' begins with an assumption and attempts to find evidence or twist facts to support this original assumption."" 3 )It is more a critical approach towards creationism, rather than simply 'creation science' that I am advocating. This article is misleading in that it appears to add totally equal merit to both creationism and evolution. While this may appear to be in the interests of NPOV, the reality is that the actual evidence for evolution is so hugely overwhelming, that to give an impression of equal validity is itself a bias point. Sorry, but the evidence for evolution is overwhelming, creationism is a pseudo-science of no real merit, and this should be quite clear in the article. I accept that an argument putting forward the 'credentials' of creationism is fair and should be included, but the argument against it should not be tamed in to give the ostensible appearance of neutrality. 17:38, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)" +" Well, it is an ""occupation"", just not a good one ). But indeed, you sorting is the right one, I hadn't noticed. Thanks! " +Greetings from WikiProject Korea! Thank you for your recent contributions to Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Korea? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Korea-related articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! +Alternative terms Though one user proposes protosequel as it was more a correct term , the main meaning of the proto- prefix is first. Thus, the clearer meaning of protosequel would be first sequel (i. e. the protosequel of Star Wars might be The Empire strikes back, while its prequels are The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Siths). the last versions of this article presented the protosecuela as a Spanish term. While neither prequela, presecuela nor protosecuela are listed in Real Academia's dictionaries, precuela is far more frequently used than the proposed alternatives, as can be found by a simple google search, or by searching it in the Real Academia Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual which presents two instances of precuela and one of precuelas, while there are none of the alternative proposals. +re: your comment - lol. actually I stopped playing swg as well with the new changes. +" Again, I never asserted the Greaseman's death. Since Neturalhomer chooses to edit his User Talk page to erase the past, I will post the relevant exchange here (he gave ""removing vandalism"" as the reason for editing it out; his only tool is a hammer, perhaps, so he sees me as a nail, perhaps) Your Lie(s) About Me You wrote: ""Final Warning Saying things like ""DC101 IS HIS FUCKING EMPLOYER!!!"" and ""Don't be a douche"" is a good way to get blocked....fast. Tone the language down...and pay attention. Greaseman ain't dead. If you continue, to add continued, now, lies to Wikipedia, I will report you to AIV and to your ISP, Verizon. Stop now, this is your final warning. - NeutralHomer • Talk "" Yes, I did use the language (on a talk page) and if it will make the booboo feel better, I apologize. But who doesn't enjoy a nice summer's eve? BUT, you need to STOP LYING about me. I never said the Greaseman was dead, only that his death had been reported by sources considered reliable by Wikipedia standards. A little attention to detail on your part would be much appreciated, Eve. Otherwise, perhaps it is I who shall report you. Tell you what: you admit and retract your lie and I will consider the matter closed. Fair? Let's look at your odd writing style: ""If you continue, to add continued, now, lies to Wikipedia,"" Just what are you going for there? I've never put a lie on Wikipedia, contrary to your assertion. Anyone who lies about me can go screw. Your threat to report me to my ISP (FOR WHAT, EVE?) is beyond pathetic. Two pops for yes!! Report away. Now, the admin who blocked me said that more than one reliable source was needed on sensitive matters. He did not research sufficiently to reach a correct conclusion. Let's all remember, shall we, that I never said that Greaseman was dead, simply that he was REPORTED DEAD. There's a big difference, and the fact that it was reported is not in dispute. I NEVER SAID GREASEMAN WAS DEAD. Yet Neutralhomer continues to assert that I did. THAT IS A LIE. I consider someone lying about me a personal attack, under Wikipedia guidelines. Is this a ""separate but equal"" or ""separate and unequal"" system? The admin who blocked me wants more than one source that someone said something on the radio. Let's look at Wikipedia's entry on Cesar Romero's personal life, shall we? There is NO source cited for his death, nor his homosexuality, yet those are all sensitive topics, are they not? Why doesn't Neutralhomer report the author of this page for vandalism? The fact that Neutralhomer claims that dealing with me gave him a migraine on the talk page of the admin who blocked me demonstrates that this is a personally based effort on his part. To recap: I never lied. I never vandalized. That should be enough. Now let's look at Wikipedia's reckless report of Cesar Romero's death and homosexuality, shall we? Sensitive matters, no? Personal life Romero believed in liberation theology. Romero was very Christian yet still believed in a utopian society whose belief is that Christ's kingdom would be very similar to Marx's envisionment of communism, and held to this belief until his death.[1][2] Romero always claimed his grandfather on his mother's side was Cuban poet and patriot José Martí, although his mother's parents were legally Carmen and Manuel Mantilla with José Martí as his godfather. There was some speculation that Maria was fathered by Martí who was a boarder in the Mantilla household, but he never claimed Maria as his daughter in his lifetime. Romero was never married, despite proposing to at least one woman. Romero made regular appearances on the Hollywood social circuit, usually in the company of an attractive actress, and he was almost always described in interviews and articles as a ""confirmed bachelor."" Romero discussed his homosexuality in a series of interviews with author Boze Hadleigh, with the understanding that they would not be published during his lifetime. Romero wore a man's tennis bracelet inscribed with his favorite nickname: ""Butch."" The term was reportedly bestowed on Romero by his one-time dancing partner Joan Crawford, who teased Romero by telling him: ""You're so butch!"" While Romero's homosexuality was an ""open secret"" in Hollywood, the movie-going public was unaware of his sexual proclivities and there was never any embarrassing scandal surrounding his male liaisons, which shows the care and finesse with which he conducted his private life for more than 60 years. Romero was a mainstay of the Hollywood social circuit until his death in 1994. He was interred at Inglewood +I propose that you mind you own business and keep this article the way it is. Thank you. +Chris Underhill Would you please close the AFD for Chris Underhill when you get a chance since you speedy deleted the article? Thanks.    (talk|contribs) +Well that settles it then. P I'm still curious though about how the Stranger (I'm guessing you play as him in Myst 5 since Atrus recognizes you at the end), lived 200 years though. Mess-up on Cyan's part? +" External Links I hadn't previously noticed, but Teahot makes a very good point in the section above: this article does not currently comply with WP:DIRECTORY; it contains a total of 56 external links. Since I'm not a regular contributor on this page I don't want to just jump in and start deleting things, but something should probably be done to trim the EL section. Tropics " +" List of Latter Day Saints I'm afraid I have been ranting on the talk page of this list, primarily because I am fed up with the aggressive tactics of our newest batch of policy enforcers and with how policy is developed and disseminated. I noted that you tried to explain a more reasonable perspective and method to our enforcer in your comments, and I admire your patience. I would appreciate your comments to my rants, if you have any interest. But I am sorry to take up extra space with my most recent ""tilting at windmills."" Best wishes. " +In The News for 2011 Egyptian revolution I think it's ready to be posted. What do you think? +" When Doves Cry Please stop changing this article to credit the song to ""Prince & the Revolution"". The song is a solo single by Prince only, as he performed and recorded it himself. The album liner notes, as well as the single (on the label) credit the song to Prince only, and it also charted as Prince only. Other songs on the Purple Rain soundtrack name-checked the Revolution, but not ""When Doves Cry"". Thanks. - " +" Precious Inquiry-based learning Thank you, Simon, for quality contributions to articles with , for interest in Inquiry-based learning, for , - you are an awesome Wikipedian! " +" The Cramp Twins The Cramp Twins is an animated series created by cartoonist Brian Wood. The show was produced in association with Cartoon Network Europe. It is about Lucien Cramp (Kath Soucie) and Wayne Cramp (Tom Kenny), not-so identical twins who live with their hygiene-obsessed mother (Nicole Oliver) and their Western-obsessed father (Ian James Corlett) in the fictional town of Soap City. Wayne and Lucian's personalities clash, and they rarely get along. Wayne has a friend called Dirty Joe (Lee Tockar), who owns a dump, and neighbour Wendy Winkle (Reverend Andrew Sparks) has a crush on him, but he hates her. Wayne's and Lucien's teacher is Miss. Hillary Hissy (Demi Buchanan, who also plays Tony's mom Lily and Mrs. Winkle). Lucien's friends include environment-friendly Tony Parsons (Terry Klassen who also plays Tony's dad, Seth) and Mari and Luke Harrison (Adam Little). Season one premiered in the UK in September 2001 on Cartoon Network (UK) and on February 2, 2002 on CBBC on BBC One respectively and has reached high popularity with children. Season one ended on 21 June 2002. A second season premiered in Autumn 2003. Season 2 finished in 2003. Season 3 started in 2004 and ended in 2005. Season 4 began in 2006 and ended that same year. The show is currently licensed to Cartoon Network. The show was originally canceled in the US in February 2005, when Mew Mew Power (aka ""Tokyo Mew Mew"") was airing in its slot February 19, 2005, and it was originally intended to be a sneak peek for the series to air September 2005 with Cramp Twins continuing to air there, but 4Kids TV decided to cancel The Cramp Twins to put Mew Mew Power in its slot. A press release went out about a possible 3-part finale answering any unanswered questions, but the show returned in the summer of 2006, and later with more new episodes. Main characters Lucien Cramp: Lucien is the smarter of the twins, but also considered the 'eco-loser'. Gentle and sensitive, Lucien is frequently bullied and name-called by his brother; Wayne's favourite choice of addressing Lucien is ""Girlpants"", but he sometimes calls Lucien a ""nerd"". Lucien enjoys science, nature and is a vegetarian. Lucian longs for a pet, but due to his mother's extreme cleaniliness rules, he is denied owning any. Secretly, Lucien keeps a worm farm under his bed, that only Tony, Mari, Wayne and Wendy know about. It is shown in many episodes that Lucien has a fear of clowns. He has many skills, including knitting, and has shown interest in playing the harp. Lucien likes going to Soap City's only swamp (the only place he gets peace from Wayne, who is afraid of the place) where Tony lives. Lucien is technically the older twin as he was born first in the opening credits. Lucien Cramp is voiced by Kath Soucie. Wayne Archibald Cramp is the blue-skinned antihero of the series. He is taller, destructive, and the less intelligent of the twins. Wayne is obsessed with junk, which he collects and hides in his room; he spends most of his time at the junkyard, owned by only friend, Dirty Joe. Unlike Lucien, who loves the swamp, Wayne is terrified of the place, and also has a fear of frogs. Wayne is constantly annoyed by Wendy Winkle who has a crush on him. Wayne's only love is anything sugary, his main source of energy, and if he is deprived from it, he becomes tired and speaks nonsense. Wayne likes to give the impression that he's the best-behaved of the twins to his mother, and sometimes Miss Hissy, but in truth, he likes to manipulate to achieve his goals. Sometimes Lucien who gets in trouble for Wayne's behaviour, although in many episodes, somehow the tides turn and Wayne is punished by pure coincidence. Wayne is vo +" The first clip is exactly ""tayt"", and the second clip is between ""tayt"" and ""tight"" ? 198.105.111.86 " +Wow! I see you are a lawyer. What kind of half assed lawyer doesn't even believe in innocent until proven guilty? +Reactive Web Design +I've come across Mokele before. He is a power hungry little bully. +Support Normally we don't just base moves of an official name changing but rather how the common name is used among reliable sources. However, I believe and a search seems to confirm that this has been the commonly used name for a while already, so it's really not an issue. (let's chat) thumbnail +" File:Elvisat13.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elvisat13.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. ▫ '''''' " +" Hi I'll get straight to it; it's my own creation for author should I use my real name or user name? Kandiwell " +Hi, thanks for the pony. Yeah, let me look at uploading the stuff to Wikicommons. Note that there really is no way to prove when any photo was ever published for the first time. I am going to argue a company bulletin would know how to tag photos the right way when they pick them up from other sources, and so those are the first publications. I do have the technical know-how for cropping, but not much of artistic skill at the stuff. Let us revisit this after I upload the other photos. +Re:Move I read the arguments and judged that at the moment consensus for a move does not exist. You are free to ask for a second opinion or even relist it if you have to, but I doubt anyone would agree that WP:Consensus could be observed from that discussion. All the best, (Talk) +" Occupation is not dependent on whether or not one invades. Syria militarily occupied Lebanon, controlling it with soldiers, arms, and a secret police. That's what Aoun's War of Liberation was about, that's what United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559 was about, that's what the Cedar Revolution was about. (talk) " +Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area. If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun! Good luck! (talk) 21:19, September 3, 2005 (UTC) +" Bot Hello, I would like a look at your bots' (Smackbot) script, if thats possible, thanks. \*/!$! " +I will, in a few days though. Cheers, and thanks, +Roughly four years ago...(response) Hello. My source four years ago was a lecture I had at York University in a class I had for a professor named Maynard P. Maidman. He's the one who told me about Jehu/Joram. I'm not quite sure how I would cite that though. - +Ceiling fan article - vandalism Yo dude, heads upmore vandalizing had been done by 67.43.101.138 to the ceiling fan article. I've reverted certain portions of his edits, and left a lengthy explanation and warning on his talk page (as I saw that you had done twice before), which I think you should read. +I just explained to you. They outline some of the school's major traditions and provide an excellent background section created by several people attending the school and various alummini. Universities are all about traditions and enterprising events and passing on/creating as many different accepted activities as possible. I'm surprised that this was even an issue to bring up. I don't think you realize how important these things are to Queen's specifically because you probably aren't a current student or did not attend the school, but they do merit inclusion into the article. +No-one is denying any discussion. What are important are reliable independent sources, due weight, and the fact that any one person's views and opinions are simply irrelevant here. +So squishy_vic@yahoo.com with the name Victor Sr is not you? seems like an awful coincidence. Nice try, but i will keep messing with you everywhere online. +Although you would probably say this isn't reliable, this source does say she is recurring. http://www.boldbeautifulfan.com/bnbnews.htm +" It wasn't the source which was the issue, the guy who reverted wrote: ""20:20, 15 February 2008 White Cat (Talk | contribs) (94,225 bytes) (The validity of the genetic study is disputed therefoee I do not believe it is OK to put that into the infobox. See Origins of the Kurds#Validity and reliability of such genetic studies) (undo)"" So it seems he questioned the validity of DNA studies in general, not this particular one. But I assume Wikipedia should be based on science, so I've put it in again. Anyhow, here's a source. There are many different studies that confirm the same, it's just a matter of picking an choosing. " +" The fat lady The other 29 teams in baseball ought to just stay home for the summer. The fat lady is in Miami, warming up her vocal cords for the Miami Florida Marlins. Talk• Contributions " +I have tried multiple times, both at wp:an/i and at wp:blp/n, to enlist administrators to keep the article on their watchlist and to consider helping mediate on the talk page. The only administrator who did attempt to assist was repeatedly attacked on his talk page for doing so and has yet to return. At this point, I don't know of any other way to express my concerns that convey the sincerity and passion the issue deserves: it's someone life we're allowing to be framed here. It's why the Foundation put forward such a notable Resolution. It's why wp:blp exists, and why special sanctions and enforcement were put forward... Yet venues for convincing administrators to roll up their sleeves and stick around don't exist, and watchlist coverage of controversial but not incredibly widespread wp:blps like Carly Fiorina are incredibly vulnerable regardless. The issue is when someone, like Carly Fiorina, decides to run for a Senate seat, in a contest already projected to be the most expensive in the upcoming elections, we end up getting caught with our pants down here at Wikipedia because we just don't have effective and thorough procedures surrounding wp:blp in place. Like what happened with Sarah Palin, coincidentally. I've expressed this time and again, and my post at wp:an/i was the best I could do to convey what I believed to be the seriousness of the issue. As I said, I don't know any other way to put it. user:J aka justen (talk) +" IMAGE DELETIONS Carnildo says you deleted two images from the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Joseph_Cormier that were posted by another WikipediA Administrator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Earl_Andrew. Is there a hierarchal structure system among Administrators so one can overrule another without discussion? One image showed the subject of the article wearing the gag ""Fear of the Truth"" over his mouth as he was beat up and removed from the Visitors Gallery of the Canadian House of Commons on the first day of televised debate in history. That would make it an image associated with history, in Canada at least. Understanding WikipediA respects copyrite restrictions, the tag applied to the deleted images reads as follows: Because the image is historically significant, the entire image is needed to identify the subject, properly convey the meaning and branding intended, and avoid tarnishing or misrepresenting the image. Low resolution? The copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification but lower resolution than the original. Copies made from it will be of inferior quality, unsuitable for uses that would compete with any commercial purpose of the photograph. Purpose of use Identification and critical commentary in the article, a subject of public interest. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed next to the associated material discussing the work, to show the primary visual image associated with the work, and to help the user quickly identify the work and know they have found what they are looking for. Replaceable? Because the image depicts a non-reproducible historic event, there is almost certainly no free equivalent. Any substitute that is not a derivative work would fail to convey the meaning intended, would tarnish or misrepresent its image, or would fail its purpose of identification or commentary. Other information Use of the historic image in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy and fair use under United States copyright law as described above. The image meets general Wikipedia content requirements and is encyclopaedic. It will take some time before the Article is so widely known by the public, there is a 0% probability any newspaper will want to claim copyvio considering the subject. Will you please undo what you did until there is a free and fair discussion by users? If there is any tag that could be associated to the disputed images to stimulate discussion, do that. The Editors of the Ottawa Citizen have been aware of its images on the Article since they were posted by Earl Andrew. DoDaCanaDa (talk) You should probably address this to User:East718, as he's the one who deleted the images. My bot merely removed them from the article. Carnildo (talk) * I don't understand the difference. His name is nowhere to be seen in the History. Would you clarify, Please? DoDaCanaDa (talk) " +" Of course, if you regard your own ideological beliefs as ""scientific"" because you conflate ideology and science, like anti-humanist Marxists do, then you are not going to be able to get any objective view of the history of Marxism. " +err... What exactly happens with Serviceman? +I put a copy of the thumbnail image into WikiCommons so that this works: Just go into edit on this page and copy and paste where needed. +" Wierd how she can fight better than Sam - " +1st and 2nd Birkenhead where both established on the same day 24/01/1908 at the YMCA there is a document in the 2nd Birkenhead hut signed by BP that proves this I assume its still there I only left a few years ago. Also as mentioned in the article the arrow park jamboree in 1924 was located there becasue the first official groups started in Birkenhead. If this is contested I could probably arrange to go and photograph it next time I'm back up there. +"==Re.:Victoria of the United Kingdeom ""Vandalism""== It's true, part of Brown's penis was placed in Victoria's coffin. Why did you remove it? " +. Again, you have been exposed +Slim V. Wikipediareview.com might be of interest to you. (Talk | Contribs 25px) +"== Categories related to the National Audio Theatre Festivals page == It is unclear why a number of categories were removed from the National Audio Theater Festivals page. I can only assume that the person who made the changes did not read the page carefully. The remaining categories imply that the NATF is simply an American radio drama performance festival and ""artists collective"". The festival is not a performance alone, but comprises a professional organization - not a ""collective"" or amorphous ""group"" - of audio engineers, sound artists, voice actors, playwrights and producers. Its yearly event, also known as the National Audio Theatre Festival, involves several days of instruction, training, special talks and other discussions on these topics. For example, training in sound mastering, sound production, voice acting. The Friday night performance is the ""cherry on the sundae"". It is one of the only conferences of its type worldwide. Many of the participants do NOT work on the radio at all, but in audio books, film or animation, and likewise, while all the training involves the audio arts, it is not just an ""audio drama festival"". The upcoming 2011 festival, for example, will be focusing on voice acting in animation. Several of the categories are rather egregious removals, such as ""Audio plays"", ""radio drama"", ""sound recording,"" ""sound technology"", and ""voice acting"", for which NATF is one of the only national training grounds or gathering for professionals... and even as other pages in those categories that are affiliated with NATF or are similarly themed stay in those categories. I therefore have returned most of the categories back. 98.194.237.126 " +" 1. Stop calling him my hero. Everyone who disagrees with you isn't in a mob. 2. This is a discussion about your behavior, not about Johansson nor John. 3. I have seen your insulting behavior for a while now, and I got a little tired of it. 4. I said I was going to bring the attention of one sysop's rights. Your piss poor of an argument is starting to get annoying. – (talk) " +I collect old Pears Cyclopaedias. I'm just pulling a few editions of the shelf as we speak. The 1898 edition shows the county town of Sussex as Chicester, as does the 1927 edition. .... okay the county town is shown as Chichester up until 1935/1936 the next edition I have is 1939 and the county town is shown as Lewes. I don't have any further details. +" Height Have corrected Lancaster's height to 6'1"", which is what he was at his peak." +UPDATE: THIS IS A LIBRARY COMPUTER. +[] This book is my source. +Ideally, the amount of weight given to a topic should relate to whether it has reliable sources to support its importance. If you've been doing research related to this topic, you are probably ideally situated to improve the article. Just be sure to cite your sources. +" Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to Elijah Muhammad. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ∞talk∞ " +Unspecified source for Image:Mutlu.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Mutlu.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. +you know? I already finish the main temple structure. whatever you say, arrogant guy. +Guinnog, for someone who's such a stickler for references, you're being pretty lax here. There are two Duncan Campbells. One works for the Guardian and the other is an investigative journalist who obtained the Landslide hard drives and wrote the article in PC Pro Magazine. If you're going to leave your latest revision in, you'll need to identify which Duncan Campbell has done the investigations. +" Don't like people calling you out on your bullshit? Cut off their tongues. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.72.22 " +"==Move== This article should be moved to Henry Dusemer. It is common in English to translate the names of nobility, especially when concerning German names. Hence it's William II instead of Wilhelm II and Albert Frederick, Duke of Prussia instead of Herzog Albrecht Friedrich von Preußen. The preposition ""von"" can easily be translated with the English ""of"" as these are (or originally were) titles, not surnames. Discussion" +" BTW, I would ask you not to quote initializations for essays if you're not going to follow the policy AGF. Say I ""know jack"" about this all you want, but the reality is Wikipedia is now stuck with a slanderous and biased article about a South American country because two editors have a creative interpretation of NPOV. ""Allegations of American apartheid"" was deleted for the sole reason that we have a large amount of American editors (or editors who know about the US) to call bullshit on it. We don't have that with Brazil. At this point I just hope we can move past this and find a way to deal with it. t/c But no matter what you assume about me and my intent, the reason I oppose this article, its title, and its current focus is that Wikipedia" +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Gujjar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) " +Yo Guy was a bastard but let's not fake quotes eh ;) +Sorry about that then. I don't know how to provide diffs. +Hi I know how the talk pages work. Your criteria is too narrow as I am discussing and replying to other editors posts in a way that ends what is becoming general discussion but does not disrespect them by ignoring them. You should know this, so Please stop the passive aggressive behaviour. +Yankee Stadium and Yankee Stadium (1923) Hi BB - saw your note on WaWeegee's talk page. Both moves have been reverted as not with support of consensus (and against WP:NAME. +" Ah! Not quite what Jarry had in mind perhaps, but I'm excited nonetheless (scheduling bravado aside). Another factor is that Jan will be busy with Berlin report this issue so we need you at your best at NAN; let's talk it up in the newsroom. Skomorokh " +"Counties are called ""she"".I won't learn history from you small greek fashist.Don't write anything to me if it's possible... " +" February By my logic, the first two meanings (lack of either a full or new moon in a month) can only occur in Februray, as the lunar cycle is 29.53 days, and the shortest non-Feburary month is 30 days. Feburary, being 28 days (or 29 in a bissextile year), is the only month that is less than the full cycle, and that therefore can miss either a full or new moon in the month. As the cycle from dark moon to dark moon is less than 29.53 days, it is also impossible to occur outside February. As for the fourth meaning (two new moons in a month), obviously this cannot occur in February. — talk " +" Atheists in foxholes A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article Atheists in foxholes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. " +Now I am going to throw the ball into your court. Prove to me that what is even written on the Barbaro page now is valid. There are no sources. You seem to be the expert on what is there. You put it there. If I'm correct the advice of keeping the first parragraph was given by Genio to you. Who was already proven to have no credit. Why should anyone take your word that what is on there now is eve If you can not prove to me that what is up there now, than I will flag the whole page to be deleted. Prove to me that what you have placed there is valid and provide me with the exact sources for those points that are on there now. +hey there STAY AWAY FROM 4CHAN +To Soft and Stout: I saw the Mr. Squiggle thing. I thought you were making a reference to a user called Mr. Squiggle and were implying he was a puppet himself. +And BTW 18th Century means 1700-1799 +Blood Bros., DoDonPachi, Final Fight, Garou: Mark of the Wolves, Giga Wing, Guwange, Mars Matrix, Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter, Metal Slug, Metal Slug 2, Metal Slug X, Metal Slug 3, Metal Slug 4, Metal Slug 5, Metal Slug 6, NAM-1975, Progear, Soul Calibur III, Street Fighter Alpha, Street Fighter II, Street Fighter III, Super Street Fighter II +" FWIW, I think all the ""References"" in the article were actual references in the text, but if any are orphaned, they can be moved to ""Further reading"" or ""External Links"". ''''''" +REDIRECT Talk:Extinct Kannada literature +Of course!! Punitive blocking!! Why didn't I think of that...... It immediately makes costive editors feel that they are doing something useful. +Further reading Further reading contains sources that are too old, only older sources, and unavailable foreign language sources. The article is bad enough without misdirecting the reader to nothing useful. This section should be removed for now, and a new list of further reading can be added when the article is worth reading. A better article now is more important, but not leading the reader to older, too old, and unavailable sources in the meantime. -198.228.217.150 +Revised Draft You Reviewed Hi Sarah, I revised this draft you reviewed on Donald Hilliard Jr. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bishop_Donald_Hilliard_Jr.. I received some guidance from chat on making changes. I hope I understood them correctly and made it more suitable now. Thank you. +The subject's sister wrote letters to the editor of the Post Gazette complaining about the coverage. Could those be referenced as rebuttals? +" Eupator's deletions I see that another user has restored the text that Eupator deleted. I would not have, because I support the removal of sockpuppet comments. Let me stress again: New or anonymous users that appear and suddenly post in support of an argument are almost always sockpuppets, and have no credibility. Please, take my advice and stop editing Armenia-related articles for a while. Give yourself a cool-down period to reflect on your goals and what you can contribute to Wikipedia. I don't want to, but if this goes much further I am going to start handing out blocks for disrupting Wikipedia. (talk) " +you are ignorant and a liar. i'm impressed noclador can at least set you straight on this utterly out of control German mentality. +" Probably. I wish an admin would deal with the page protection request. The new/IP editors seem to purposefully be editing against our normal standards, both on the article and talk page. talk to me " +Fred M. Levin I created a page on the neuropsychiatrist Fred M. Levin. But he may not be influential in this field. mwalla +" D.C. Historic Sites While watching for broken infoboxes (I've rigged the bright orange ""new messages"" banner to display when there is one), the United States Botanic Garden came up. It doesn't appear to be on the NRHP and I was going to replace the infobox with an ""Historic sites"" one, but it does have a local D.C. designation. I don't know if you wanted to set up the new designation, or not. I did find an inventory list to go with it, however.. ​​​​​​​​ ​​Don't give up the ship " +Alright, fine, I acknowledge that I did something wrong, and will not do it again +" Talk:AXXo/GA1  (talk) " +" Actually that was a correct warning. If you revert one more time, you will be blocked per WP:3RR. — yes...or no " +Wow, what a shock. Just as I start having a decent discussion with someone in charge, you blocked. Great job adding the timeframe too. Heaven forbid you tell people how long they're banned for. +You just can't get over it Seriously, I never even know WHEN I was banned (I assume it was in September with Iluvteletubbies). But can you EVER forgive me? Or will I be your mortal enimy for all entern ity? Look at Tod and Copper, they were enimes because they were supposed to, but they GOT OVER IT 'CAUSE TOD SAVED COPPER? Do you want me to save you from a bear like Tod did or something? By now, if you're willing to forgive, I'm willing to forgive. BUT THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN BECAUSE YOU STINK!! Learn from Tod please, 74.230.35.110 +I would like to see the following added to the New World section; The Chupacabra in modern Latin American folklore is reported to be a small creature which attacks and drains the blood of small livestock with its fangs, leaving two puncture holes in the neck. Various reports of the creature have ranged as far north as California and as far south as Chile. Unlike most vampire legends the Chupacabra reportedly has no interest in human blood. +3 Former Olympics swimmers are currently senior coaches and 1 is the head coach +" David Johnson (footballer born 1976) Hi mate, it's odd for me to have to thank you for decimating an article such as you did yesterday to the article on David Johnson (footballer born 1976). Nevertheless, that is what I must do, as I spent most of last night scouring the BBC's archives (using the Wayback machine a hell of a lot along the way) and rewriting the entire page. I wonder if you might take a look at the state of the article as it is now and perhaps give it a new quality rating on the talk page. I was going to do it myself (it's probably up to B-class by now), but I don't feel that's appropriate after I spent the entire night working on it. Cheers. – Jay So what do you think it needs now to get it up to GA-class? – Jay OK, cheers mate. Thanks for doing the review. – Jay Stats tables - group stats by club or list them chronologically Hi, as you made this edit at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players, I'm sure you remember the discussion(s) which led to this consensus. Could you please give me the link to this discussion, preferably here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Players#Group stats by club or list them chronologically so that others can find them, too? Sebastian Lletget Hello GS, could you please restore Sebastian Lletget's history in a few hours from a previous AfD. The article has been recreated already because he's making his debut now in the FA Cup against Nottingham Forest. Thanks, Eusébio I'm verifying sources thank you very much. Don't tell me how to work here. I'm a trusted user, give me time to finish. (talk) I said let me work. If you do not let me finish including the references, I will report you. Do NOT bully me. (talk) Just when I was clicking the edit button to finish including ALL the references, it gets cancelled. Thanks a lot. I hope you are a very happy man now. (talk) What is it hard to understand? Are you kidding me? How old are you? 15? I WANT TO SAVE THE REFERENCES BUT YOU KEEP REVERTING MY EDITS AND EVERYTHING GETS CANCELED. (talk) If you gave this person the chance to add the source, your requirements would be satisfied, as I suggested on my talk page. It is disgusting attitudes from people like you that put me off Wikipedia. I want to edit and add the references but thanks to your persistent reverts, everything I write gets erased and so I have to revert your own revertions in the way I can then add the references. Of course by the time I am about to save the references, you revert all over again and it gets into a cat and mouse game to you, doesn't it? You play with people's deaths in ways that go beyond absurd. (talk) Nice tone to use for an administrator. Thank you for your so ever delightful insight. You said you want references? I'll give you references. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 All this for ""unreferenced material"" you never wanted me to complete. (talk) I want you to have an idea of all the minutes I devoted into writing all that which you unfairly reverted. I'm considering leaving Wikipedia for good. You've been one of the last straws but before I do anything further (either leave Wikipedia or report you) I want you to know all I did was done will +Article any useful? Greetings, i think we should propose this article for deletion for many reasons. First off, it was only created because of the fact that he is the brother of former NBA player Vassilis Spanoulis. What's more he's playing for a team for which there is not even an article on wikipedia. Also, the teams he's formerly played for aren't known. +[[unblock|unsigned comments by circle of connected users betray a campaign of coordinated attempts to block this account by aggravated and inflammatory delete tags and covert communications between users concerned notably Crusio, etc. all of whom have made several delete or merge articles which have been previously reviewed as keeps. They have also made repeat edits contradicting well-researched material and have a concerted agenda to gain ownership of articles. They have made false allegations of 'promotion', placed delete tags on articles and made innacurate edits and contradicted researched data without leaving a message on the article's or my talk page first. Any comments have been a justified reaction to a spate of backhand discussions and disruptive edits which reflect poorly on the users concerned who hide behind a veil of 'wiki' conventions in their aggravating edits. +" Support - ""chairman"" is more common and unforced, and carries no implications of masculine sex, only gender (and anyway English doesn't really have grammatical gender). See Merriam-Webster's (""the presiding officer of a meeting, organization, committee, or event; the administrative officer of a department of instruction (as in a college)"") and Oxford (""The occupier of a chair of authority; spec. the person who is chosen to preside over a meeting, to conduct its proceedings, and who occupies the chair or seat provided for this function.""). Talk " +You are probably thinking of what was then called the White Sands Proving Grounds, which was operated by the Army, as opposed to this facility which is operated by NASA. The connection between the two is described at White_Sands_Missile_Range#NASA_use. ( - talk) +" Support - this is the most notable thing about Savage. " +" Regarding your edits to Mystery Men You clearly need to read WP:MOSFILM, because your film edits are not helpful. -''''''The '45 " +Heyo! Obese boy if u can make it to 2009 (that heart struggling amongst all the girth) I'd say there is a such thing as magic. Enjoy this > . Thinking about creating you a nice my space with your picture. Before will be yours, after will be the pic of the walrus By the way, I WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF U POURED SOME BARBECUE SAUCE ON CKATZ. WOULD U GUYS STILL BE FRIENDS. DOUBTLESSLY HE'D be seeing the inside of your digestive system 143.235.209.240 +Yes, I gather that this is standard procedure on Wikipedia in situations where replying would require the other person to admit they were wrong, or have otherwise not fully thought out their position. It seems to be the Wikipedia version of taking the 5th, albeit deployed in even more cynical ways. I was going to follow up with a specific example of how a few days ago Davey made a massively bad faith assumption about me, but I guess there's no point now. +April 2014 production approved Its not vandalism, my friend. Read OPs profile next time before you revert any Town Car or Crown Vic articles http://answers.yahoo.com/activity;_ylt=AsRyzb88gVwQ4UNQvpCy7O24QAx.;_ylv=3?show=pxs3E8etaa&view;=public 166.137.208.22 +and to conclude or confirm this please check the edit summaries carefully ( ). +Thanks for your concern Thanks for your concern, but pointing out someone's biases and inappropriate conduct is not incivil. I see that he's lied about me up above. As for your comment on edit wars, I already have a policy that I do not edit the content of Ahmadinejad's page myself, becuase Khorshid and his fellows started an edit war themselves the last time I did that. +" Hi, thanks for your interest. Please note that I am not in any way affiliated with Norman Lowell or his political party, nor am I a supporter or sympathizer. Yet, I do believe that, like other articles on wikipedia, it should be free from any bias. I will doubtless reword anything that is defamatory (statements such as ""far-right"", ""largely ignored"" etc will be instantly deleted, since these are sheer personal opinions.), as per Wikipedia's policy. " +June 2007 Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sauce Face, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. +You forgot to add the url for your additional source. I found this one: which, if it's the one you meant, you might want to add. From what I see in my find and in your quote above it gives the height as 800ft/244m and NOT the 244m (801ft) that you changed the text too. I understand that 244m converts mathematically to to 800ft, but it is also true that 800ft converts mathematically to 244m. So as the latter seems a better match, and as we have no good reason to assume otherwise, I've restored the original figures so as not to deviate from the official dimensions. +Oh yeah, let's be nice to that fat whore Sherrod and not link to something becuse it makes that crybaby scum poop in her pathetic diaper...166.248.64.163 +" Addition to Rise In Polularity There are several websites listed in this section - all include who founded them, except Open Diary, which was founded by Bruce Ableson. Perhaps change it to ""Bruce Ableson founded Open Diary in October, 1998..."" to match the other entries. " +Vandalism is maybe a wrong word here (it's in the template). The link you provide was superfluous though, as it was already mentioned in the line above it.. And please sign your messages with ~~~~. Thanks. +fuck you fuck you retard son of a bitch your ass is bigger that goatse, u suck 10 dicks at the same time and drink all the cum, your mom worked as a prostitute to buy condoms for your dad, that fucking retard, you are a failure at all you do, you should jump from the top of the empire state so the world becomes a better place, you are the reason of the global warming, you fart so much you drown everyone is with in a room, you waste precious oxygen that should be used by better people, you suck like all wikipedians fuck you ED +fuck off, jack 159.242.66.76 +Hiwe added a lot of really helpful info about different types of feeding tubes to the page. It was all deleted because the linksto a non-profit, and a free non-commercial children's medical sitewere considered spammy. The main reason we edited the page is because there is so little information available on the web about feeding tubes. Medical texts provide minimal information on this subject and are notoriously lacking in practical information. There are only two books on tubefeeding availableone for nurses/dieticians and one for patients, neither written by a physician. I would be happy to add the material back in without the references so at least the information is available. +Am I welcome on Wikipedia? My brother is an abusive sockpuppet and I'm scared that I will be blocked if I say who. +October 2009 Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. +I don't even know you and you keep deleting my posts. You cannot do that. +sexual congress with goats +REDIRECT Talk:Popular Movement (Morocco) +" Fresh Start Alright, Neil, Let's try from the beginning again, hopefully with a better result this time. The Genseiryū Karate-do International Federation article is clearly being vandalized by Mario Roering as he removes links and references from the article with false reasoning. Example here []. The link clearly shows, that the book exist, and who the author is. Here Mario Roering removes yet another reference, even though the reference clearly states, that this is the first book ever []. Here Mario Roering ads a link to a Taido site, with an essay on the history of TAIDO, not Genseiryu [], thus irrelevant on the issue of Genseiryu. This reference has some correct dates, some correct information, but is at best only a collection of information found on the Internet from various other sources and is as well full of equally incorrect information. Mario Roering does not cite any phrase of the essay, and he does not provide any reasons for why this reference should be better than the one already included. Thus this is not a researched essay or document. Also Taido is siding with the WGKF and supporting them as can be seen on many pictures, and even the agreement of the establishment of the WGKF. At best, this reference is a none supported, none factual and partial essay. And like it says, it is an essay on Taido, not Genseiryu. As a third party reference this is not valid. Many of the things Mario Roering has disputed in the great many earlier edits, is among others, that Kunihiko Tosa (president of the GKIF) was not the first student of the founder Seiken Shukumine, but in this essay it says that he started taking lessons from the founder in 1952, one year prior to the establishment of Genseiryu in 1953. The essays mentions that Kunihiko Tosa published A (some) book on Genseiryu, which is I guess the reason for Mario Roering to include this ""source"". Using this argument as a counterargument to my source and claim, is the same as leaving it up to me to proof a negative. That Kunihiko Tosa wrote and published a book on Genseiryu in 1984 is confirmed in the essay as well as other sources included by me, but it does not say that the book is the first ever on Genseiryu. As I mentioned above, this is like saying that when something is not mentioned, it is not so, which of course cannot be laid down as fact or support for removing my claim as this book being the first ever on Genseiryu. Another point is, that if Mario Roering wants to include this essay as a valid reference, he must accept all the postulates in the essay, also the ones that he has disputed many times before. But, well, I guess that will not happen. Thus this reference should be discarded, as it is not trustworthy as a reference, but merely a collection of information found on the Internet. The author is not named (could not find it anyway) and the sources used in this essay are not listed. Here [] Mario Roering deletes a valuable link to a reference part of Kunihiko Tosa's book written in 1984. In this book, the founder of Genseiryu, Seiken Shukumine, wrote a preface and he co-authored the book as a technical advisor, as well as he himself recognized this book as being Genseiryu. The reference is thus a valid one, but it is my opinion, that Mario Roering wants this left out, simply because this contradicts his own views and his perception of what is the true Genseiryu. In Mario Roering's world, he would feel a lot better, if this book and the preface by the founder would simply go away, like go back in a time machine and make sure it was never published. Mario Roering has claimed on more than one occasion, that we (the GKIF) are not doing Genseiryu, but only that the WGKF is. This book clearly shows, that the founder approved and supported Kunihiko Tosa as Genseiryu. Thus the contradictions clearly stands out. It is obvious, that Mario Roering wants it left out, simply because it shows that his claims are untrue and impossible to proof, and that it is thus easier to simply get this claim removed. Here [] Mario Roering wants to provoke me by asking for citation. It is obvious, that this information originates from an interview I had with the author Kunihiko Tosa. The information has been put there t +Agreed! He can go to hell. I will keep this up for a few days though because it's hilarious. +Atkinson I only used the source which Doug Weller put in the talk page, but I appreciate that a more reliable source is needed. The thing is that this bizarre hoax is spreading over Islamist sites, blogs and social networking but on no source even remotely viable, as with the Muslim rage over false comments attributed to Nicki Minaj and David Villa over Islam. If this ever gets a reaction from Atkinson or his management, and that reported on a viable site, then would a short sentence on the matter be notable enough on the 'Personal life' section? +Until before 50 years, jews had same status with blacks.You were not allowed to prestigious places.But that has changed by investing money on media... Don't forget; Nazis were praised about what they have done against jews in USA... +Marriage Shouldn't this article discuss feminist's views on marriage, especially criticism of it (which has been part of feminist though from early on)? +Yes, I was about to mention that also. Would it not be better to wait until the debate on the RSN about Beacon Light is completed before using the reference here? +" Image copyright problem with Image:D-moor crew.png Thank you for uploading Image:D-moor crew.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  (Parrot) " +" RE: Get a fuckin' job, dude. Most all these I upped before you little trolls starting bitching about pointless rationale, I barely edit shit anymore cuz of you faggots, so block me and ""make your point"". Do you not realize this is the most pointless shit in human history? ""You can't have album covers on here unless you type 'oh this is fair use because blah blah blah'"", go asphyxiate on a cock. " +Nicely done, zaph. Would that all your arguments were this concise, structured, and dispassionate. +Adil Asrar Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Adil Asrar, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. +You guys have it all wrong but I want to see GabeMc blame every user, with his OCD problems, being a sockmaster for these IPs first. You are looking at all your scapegoats at not at the real seasoned editors attempting to prove my point. It's like shooting reindeer in a zoo. I think we have a good demo of Larry, Curly and Dennis here. I found this IP under Evan's dump pile. 148.63.190.70 +flatly contradicts it +after all of these months. If you have not noticed already, Alina has gotten the lead role in a new movie. I do plan on fixing up her page as to look much better and I plan on adding sources. It'll take me some time though. +Site down / moving servers +Seventh, since Ratel is obviously wrong about Wikipedia policy, I will not bother to ask his help. I will stay off his talk page, because, frankly he's not a reliable source of information on how things work here. I do not want to follow his advice and mistakenly bring down the Wiki quality, as I did on the Taxpayer March on Washington article. +I never said i did you ugly bastard. Get of my case, you bitch whore. Piece of shit. I said i have the right to post the No Israel and Christian Fiction userboxes NOT the personal info you bitchfuck. You fuckin fuckface. This is why I hate the Wikipedia system. It makes it difficult for people to function. You stupid shitface. +the OTRS ticket quoted on the template does not give permission to use the images, the e-mail referred to by otrs:20051200210003144 ticket is in fact a request for information and not a e-mail releasing images under a free license. βcommand +REDIRECT Talk:South Africa Conciliation Committee +Iranian Commanders Lets Get something straight here; I will tell you who was really a commander on the Iranian Side. Ayatollah Khomeini- The Supreme leader controls the Army and the Pasdaran, so Khomeini is without a doubt a commander. Ayatollah Khamenei- The president maintains some control over the army and while he reports to the Supreme Leader, he still welds significant control over their day to day operations, therefore Khamenei is Also a Commander Mostafa Chamran- he was the Minister of Defense and a General under the Early stages of the war. He was killed in Action late in 1981. So he would have been sincerely a comander. Ali Sayad Shirazi- Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces during the War, no question about his classification as a Commander. Mohsen Rezaee- Commander of the Pasdaran, Heavily involved in the fighting, again, no question. Now here are people who should not be classified as commander. Abdolhassan Banisadr- President but He was impeached in the first days of the war, so he never commandered anything during the War. Mohammad Ali Rajai- President only for less than three weeks after Banisadr, so he never commandered anything. Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani- Throught his career as a cleric during the War, Rafsanjani never went into affairs regarding the military (exception being the Iran-Contra Affair) and simply worked with business within the country. Mir Hossein Mousavi- The Prime Minister did not wield any power over the military, he simply worked exclusively on affairs within the country. So please don't change the commanders list, this is all the proof you need. +There's a lot more explosive in an ERA box than in a typical incoming warhead, and there is a serious fragmentation and blast damage risk to those standing or sitting nearby. The US doesn't typically let people ride tanks because tanks attract fire, and people fall off and get run over fairly often (a serious hazard in training, and a significant hazard in combat), and the US has plenty of Humvees and M-2 IFVs. Other countries tended to both want to reduce training injuries and keep people away from the ERA blocks, and restricted tank riding at the same time. You saw it a bit in Chechenyia with Russian tanks, but they lost a fair number of infantry to the secondary ERA explosions and stopped doing it. I support putting the article back for that reason... +" It's good to see that you agree. Whether Russell was a bust is an opinionand that is the only information included under ""Impact."" The line about ""quickest"" release is factually inaccurate. The source is from a blogger. I know that Bill Williamson works for ESPN, but the bloggers aren't held to the same standards. A section on ""Opinions"" could also include the recent comments by Stephen A. Smith on ESPN.67.169.25.132 " +hey you r a douche +" LOL! I got so caught up in being right that I lost my head for a minute. I forget that for a lot of people, all they have for their claims of professional writing IS Wikipedia, and they'll froth and snap over that crap like babies with their toys. Keeping the article just adds to the ""Wikipedia is a joke"" thing. Not my problem. " +" About the WMA award show we should include this info in the article "" The 2006 show which also featured the legendary Michael Jackson was held at Earls Court in London, United Kingdom. The show is broadcast to North and South America, all of Europe, the Middle East, Japan and South East Asia, all of mainland China, some other parts of Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and all of Africa reaching an estimated worldwide audience of around one billion viewers, in over 160 countries. http://awards.montecarloresort.com/03/w03pre00.asp "" at least include how around one billion people watched it. " +IT IS 95% WORD-FOR-WORD FROM THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER ARTICLE WITH NO ORIGINAL WRITING. THAT IS COPYVIO/PLAGIARISM. +totally unacceptable when it comes to the Second Sino-Japanese war +" Wha? I don't get you at all. Brown's webpage is called ""planetlila"" after his daughter, not Eris. podous " +" This is wrong Why is this article called (and stylised) 'WWE Friday Night SmackDown!'? │here Is that not the name of the show? I guess. I was thinking it should be called 'WWE SmackDown', like WWE Raw (although it's not written in upper case letters, and doesn't say Monday Night, which is now understandable when you consider the name of the show/logo and all). Speaking of which, there is no longer an exclaimation mark when SmackDown is concerned, not in text or logo - so something should definitely be done about that. It also makes articles incoherent when editors stylise it that way. │here Not in the logo? OK... 3:16 The official name is ""WWE Firday Night SmackDown!"", all you have to do is watch SmackDown to see that. Spyke Then the other article should be called 'WWE RAW'. │here 22:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC) It is called ""WWE Raw""... No because ""RAW"" is only referring to the ""brand"" of WWE. ""Raw"" is name of the ""television show"", like ""Friday Night SmackDown!"" and ""Extreme Championship Wrestling"". TaLk / The new logo on the show now only says SmackDown, so should the title be changed accordingly? There still seems to be some confusion in WWE sources though, with the website still calling it Friday Night SmackDown! The oficial name of Smackdown, as of February 2006 is ""WWE Friday Night Smackdown"", ther is no loger a ""!"" in the logo, and you can't tell, by the logo, that you have t the top of the page, becuase it is nearly two years out of date! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.2.45 How about actually watching SmackDown! for once? 3:16 Woh... This changes everything. Did anyone notice anything different on this Friday's edition of SmackDown (hint, hint)? 3:16 The logo no longer says ""Friday Night."" At the same time, the announcers still refered to it as Friday Night Smackdown. Actually if you notice that the SmackDown! logo DOES still say Friday Night but no longer contains the !. BUT DOES include the WWE logo before Friday Night. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 23:09, 28 Januar +" A tag has been placed on Jonathan Godwin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +I reported him for DE in general for deleting the content under discussion, but If you feel he is at 3rr as well, you may certainly suggest that in the ANI. +REDIRECT Talk:1954 BOAC Lockheed Constellation crash +From: Remote Sensing Center Hi, Apparently I have misread all instructions and have been making a mess of my new page. I am trying to create a listing for a specific center within a school. Since there are listings for universities and schools, where do I post my conglomeration of information? For now, I deleted the page I initially created and put all of the information under my user page. However, I am hoping that people will be able to find the information I have posted as a regular page. I'm totally confused and would appreciate ANY and ALL help! Thank you! +It was, just an edit conflict. I already responded to Jclemens about it. Thanks. +If you don't want me to respond, stop pinging me/talking about me please. Snowman +i am from urdu wikipedia please confirm what is date of birth of khoso 30 september or 30 december?please crroect it +" Anyone who reads the patient, well-reasoned discussion presented on that Talk page can see that Consensus has been established by reliable sources. It is my actions that are in accord with those sources. If anyone is on the destructive side of ""edit warring"", it would be those who refuse to follow the clearly stated policy. You yourself are refusing to address the points I have been stressing regarding how my actions are the ones that conform to policy. I have now posted a video of Jimmy Wales there where he explains how facts are established by what the reliable sources say. If you don't want to listen to me, and you don't want to read it in Wikipedia Policy, then maybe you'll listen to him. I am very sad to know that the majority of admins I have encountered here are those who don't seem to care enough to follow what the policies say. " +. You've set your friend on the pedestal as a martyr and refused to think rationally. Ya'all's argument is a joke at this point. Keep it up, the more you drone on about admin abuse and desysops, the more folks are becoming desensitized to it +and violence between the various +" balts DIDNT MURDER JEWS? They did, more then anybody else! to dlx and all his friends ITS A KNOWN FACT, it's like asking: Find me a link in the internet that fire burns if you touch it, but if you want, please: http://www.jewishgen.org/latvia/SIG_Newsletter/0703_SIG_April_2003.pdf http://www.jewishgen.org/yizkor/lithuania1/lithuania1.html and the quotes: Unlike other Nazi-occupied countries, where most Jewish citizens were put to death in gas chambers, a large majority of Jews in the Baltic countries were slaughtered brutally with firearms and other weapons by their Lithuanian, Latvian, and Estonian neighbors (sometimes under German supervision). Children in the Kovno ghetto, whose friends had been murdered by Lithuanians, wrote in Lithuanian a bitter parody of the national anthem ""Lithuania, Our Homeland"": Lithuania, Our Blood-Land May you be accursed for centuries Let your blood flow Like the blood of Jewish children"". (and so on) Another document: http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2005/baltics.htm Just type Baltic states jews murder in google and you will get more, this are only the forst two. and there are many more like this! M.V.E.i. " +" Odd sentence The following sentence, ""Sommerstein favours Graves's interpretation saying that ancient sexual predators did not murder"" juxtaposes ancient and modern concepts, and seems surprising in a scholarly work. Would you mind backing it up with an exact quote from the book? Thanks, " +Friendly request Would your revert at Saints Cyril and Methodius? +Wait a Minute Sorry if I sounded accusing! Someone has been stressing me out adding a fake cover to the section and I am not really sure how to cite the real one. Do I just put the new picture up and place the source to it at the bottom of the page with the others? +Shooting thaler Hi John. Sorry to bother you, but I just wanted to let you know that I added a suggestion to your sandbox for the new tables we're working for the shooting thaler article. I mentioned it on the shooting thaler talk page, but I thought you might have missed it. My apologies if you've been busy with other things! Thanks!- +succession boxes I really wish you wouldn't remove succession boxes, which I notice you've done for various Delaware politicians. They are highly useful for navigating, and, I think, are certainly no more space consuming than the large tables you've been creating. (They also contain more information, in that they give predecessors and successors, where the tables you've created do not). +" Evidence of prior mass-production of the Rolls-Royce Merlin:- ""... the preponderance of unskilled labour at Glasgow rendered the factory particularly reliant on up-to-date production methods and mechanisation. Machine tools were arranged and set for single-purpose operations, and the factory was planned on a flow production basis, with the minimum of rehandling."" (Ritchie, Sebastian Industry and Air Power. The Expansion of British Aircraft Production, 1935-1941, Frank Cass, 1997, p135) Rolls-Royce Glasgow was operational by February 1941. (ibid, p135 & p144) " +GET SOME GLASSES YOU MENTAL FAGOTs, IM Calling you the idiots SHITheads!!!!! What the F@#%k is wrong with you. +" User name report on UAA I had a quick conversation with who let me know that the user name was just in Chinese, which is obviously not supported by my browser. It appeared empty to me. Best regards and happy new year ₪ Message " +Please read the references. +You are inflexible in your private and particular interpretation of the rules. There is no rule that says that external links, even if fully appropriate, must be removed in case of a possible conflict of interest. There is even less of a rule that if a previously removed external link is re-instated by several editors in good standing, who have no such conflict of interest and who add the external link based on their considered judgement of its merits, it shall, must and will nevertheless remain removed, if necessary by indefinite reverts, to which task you have been called. Or did I miss something? In that case, please edify me.  Talk +"==Rita DiCaprio== Hello! This is about the article Rita DiCaprio, which you started. You note that she is an ""award-winning artist"", but I can find no references to support this. Can you please tell which awards she has won? Thanks. ''''? " +Irish bishops A discussion is underway at Category talk:Irish bishops that may be of interest to you. +I think if youy can made an article for him you can do one of themn all. It would be a good idea to spilt him off and have an own article, or merge them all into an article. 65.0.191.174 +Belgian Scrabble Federation BSCF Could you translate it in English , please ? I asked you to write this article Austrian Bridge Federation , help me a second time. 109.214.188.43 +" FCW Check the list at WP:PW/MOS. The reliable sources are there as are the sources to avoid. !! a Punk !! " +Question What is so wrong with the LSO link that you keep removing it and marking it as 'SPAM'? It seems like a perfectly acceptable link to me. +" Anyway, Hey! I'm mboverload. Nice to meet you Acroterion. I was wondering what kind of camera you used for . I noticed you used a film scanner. It's a great photo. @ " +Another major swoop through the draft I did another major swoop through the draft, mostly to simplify overly complex sentences that I let slide the first time through, but also a lot of simple copyediting. Please check over to make sure that I haven't adversely changed their intended meanings. Thanks! +Well, if it is a prank, I think it is not funny anymore: I reverted it three times this weekend, and left messages to the anons who put it, but I'm confident it will come back... +"::::::::: It is unprudent to claim that the fact who started the war,is ""irrelevent"".Any law collage student knows that from the standpoint of the international legal system,it is of crucial importance to determine who was the agressor.In our case,there is no doubt that georgian government violated the peace agreement and brutally attacked S.Ossetia in early August of 2008,hoping Russia will turn a blindeye on the assasination of its peace-keepers and its citizens as well as on the violation of the previous agreements.The sheer brutality of georgian attack accounted for much damage of civil buildings in Tskhinvali as well as for hundreds of casualties among the ossetian population. - - In this sense,we have right to blame georgian side for ANY damage and ANY casualties that have been the consequence of the georgian-started war. " +" Your checklinks is also tagging a few links that aren't dead links. Maybe you could run checklinks separately from your ""fixes"" of piped links, so we can fix one without you having to redo the other. Some are, but some are not, can you manually check your work for a bit and tell the checklink coders that they are being overeager? You're making a lot of work for people if you mis-tag stuff. I have close to 2000 articles watchlisted, and mass tagging by machine is a real pain to fix manually. I'm sure you want to improve wikipedia, and linkrot is an ongoing concern, but please double-check for a bit, OK? (talk) " +Blockign Anthony Robbins You fucking moron. You blocked the wrong person. Useless prick. +" Sure, go for it. - 37 [talk] " +I will oppose the nomination on the grounds of lack of common sense and breaking Wikipedia Policy on the grounds of the article being the work of a sole editor and not being a collaboration. +If not, I'm a fucking moron who should fuck off and stop being such an imbecile. +" I've asked about this at talkstats.com. They seem to agree: http://www.talkstats.com/showthread.php/57558-Coefficient-of-determination-interpretation Anyone mind if I change ""variation"" to ""variance"". " +I've saved enough space for a Cat. 6 column, you can start straight away if you wish to do so -) +" I agree with the points above, however I also believe that without a reference to a study or another credible source of evidence, it cannot be accurately stated that a ""no negotiation"" policy leads to a reduction in hostage situations. In the modern world, many of the terriorists involved in hostage situations are religiously motivated, believing that they will go to heaven when they die, and thus not afraid of death. Stanislav B." +PICTURE That photo of him makes him look extremely gay. I advise we change it +Drop dead Drop dead. +Hello there Hello there. I'd like to apologise for the abuse you suffered the other day when I let my nephew use my computer...sorry about that. I hope he didn't upset you too much. +" It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Florida Gators. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. talk " +what up, my comma deleting nigga? +I did not attack any EDITORS, I attacked one of the SOURCES cited in the article. These are two different things altogether. Please re-read my comment carefully and see for yourself. 67.169.177.176 +Question How does one go about requesting/setting up a deletion sorting list (e.g., Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople) for a new topic area? I would like to set up a new deletion sort list for swimming. Please let me know. +Yes, rewrite it as I suggested. I have an ArbCom case to prepare, so don't have the time to do this. +Your a Pecker Hey pecker head, you deleted my article! You’re a jerk and you need slapped. First I was not done, I was working on it the moment you deleted it, it did not interfere with any guidelines ether. You didn’t notify me before you deleted like you where supposed to, I don’t know what power you have with wikipedia but stop abusing it and get a life. Pecker. Jody Shackelford Also I am reporting you to wikipedia, immediatly! Im pretty sure they have a no pecker policy. +" I think I can handle it. Fiddle maybe correct, the article at its present form can drive anyone crazy. But editing shall take place, once I get consensus. (Talk) " +Well Sinneed, Muze? Where are you? I will happy to forgive you when you have realized the error of your ways. Ah well... 71 hours to go. Thanks a lot, Muze. That was not very nice. +JIMBO WALES SUCKS OFF DANIEL BRANDT I'm just stating facts people.~~1~~ +REDIRECT Talk:Georgia State Route 25 Spur (Woodbine) +Hm. It's amazing that I didn't even notice the wrong acronym...(!) ) — tizzle +Thank you, . That was all I was looking for, an explanation. Now that you have explained your edit, I have no objections to re-adding the category. Thanks again. +Jerk Ill shwo you idiot! I will finish your life you idiot! For the last time! There is NO name to the Cathedral! That is it! Do uyou understand? +Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. '''' If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' +" please call me at once I do have a local number for SG: 65-6336-3371 — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) " +What I THINK THIS ARTICLE Republic of China NEED MORE AND MORE PICTURES , SEE People's Republic of China ANDSouth Korea ANDJapan ANDSingapore , THESE ARTICLE HAVE A LOT OF PICTURES ,SHOULDN SOMEBODY TO ADD MORE PICTURES FOR Republic of China? +" Cookie Thanks for the message. I will have to read the rules on this. Seems, Filipinos like us do not on the average have or grow beards or mustaches. Cheers. and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Spread the goodness of cookies by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. " +I just wanted to comment that those other people are not me. +"* And only almost a year later. ∴ChatMe! " +Hope this is useful. It would be nice if someone could source and quote the remark attributed to her given in the Simon Schama BBC History of Britain referneced which I couldn't locate +Oh, and thanks for vindicating my decision to repost this threat to to the articles talk page, to see if there was a pattern of such behavior. +@Brit guy... good one. The comment was not a generalization for all brits. I speak English and you can very well understand that I respect the Queen and all but the loser who think that a guy with darker skin can easily be a target need to review their thinking and meet a shrink to clean their messed up inferiority-complex filled sub-conscious ) and being a bipedal you ought to learn to sign your name after edits ) +" Orphaned non-free image (Image:FoxTrot_Foxtrotius_Maximus_-_2004.JPG) Thanks for uploading Image:FoxTrot_Foxtrotius_Maximus_-_2004.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tex " +Yeah I saw that, that's why I mentioned it ) I haven't adopted anyone before, but it's like any mentoring thing... Leave questions either place, or we could have a separate page if you like. ☺ +If you have a citeable source for this (e.g. a publication by AC Clarke) then I would suggest that it trumps the citation given as I personally regard a website from an enthusiastic amateur with suspicion. 212.183.128.199 +Italian colonisation of the Americas Hi Remus, I edited your translation of the article about the Italian colonisation of the Americas (which I found very interesting BTW, well done), as there were a few (mostly minor) translation mistakes which could have kept the less Italophones from fully appreciating the article. Please do let me know what you think about it. Cheers, Also, I opened a page move discussion to solve whatever naming dispute there is/has been regarding the name of the article. +have you even went to the reference? i reference it every time... why dont you go edit my reference if your so smart??? go edit it to make it where im wrong... ) then delete my post... +Oxonian2006, if you don't live in the states, you would not understand it. Americans are more likely to vote for the more attractive person. I am not saying she got the VP bid because of her looks, but I am pretty sure her beauty had a LOT to do with her becoming governor. Anyone with half a brain can see she is hot. +Rats in movies Missed out Borris from Home Alone 3, the main charatcer's pet. Borris had a lot of screen time, possibly more than the main characters siblings, but less than the pet parrot. +OR Could you help clean out some original research on some Family Guy Articles? Thanks!68.79.88.224 +Korean invented TOFU i think in the first paragraph, it should mention that korean invented tofu +questioned my already fradulent heterosexuality. +Before commenting about the European website being removed, do visit the URL http://www.free-will-europe.com/ +" Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Surdas with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. " +? Is it some sort of a new version of history that is being sought to be told and spread to unsuspecting visitors to these pages +The prose in these article is not the best. Are you saying that once an editor takes an article to FA its off limits for others? +" See Wikipedia:Paragraph#Paragraphs: ""One-sentence paragraphs are unusually emphatic, and should be used sparingly."" ""Some paragraphs are really tables or lists in disguise. They should be rewritten as prose or converted to unmasked form."" I'm all for bulleted lists. - " +Yazdânism AND Bahá'í should be DELETED from Template:Islam Since you modify this template frequently, ıf you compare Template:Islam with Template:Religion topics it is clear that Yazdânism AND Bahá'í should be DELETED from Template:Islam According to Template:Religion topics Bábism Azali Bahá'í Faith Druze ARE Abrahamic religions BUT NOT Islam AND Yazdânism (Yazidism · Ishikism · Ali-Illahism · Yarsanism) ARE Indo-Iranian religions AND they are non-islamic IN CONCLUSION Yazdânism AND Bahá'í SHOULD BE DELETED from Template:Islam Druze Druze, on the other hand, might be included explicitly in to the list.68.100.166.227 Corrected template Corrections | list5name = classical denominations | list5title = Classical denominations | list5 = Sunni Shia Sufism Ibadi | list6name = other denominations | list6title = Other denominations | list6 = Ahmadiyya Druzism Mahdavia Nation of Islam Quranism Tolu-e-Islam Wahhabism (?) 68.100.166.227 I'll appreciate if you modify it accordingly. +" I don't agree with the proposed name change. There is a large and still growing body of literature considering US foreign policy from the conceptual perspective of state terrorism and concluding that U.S. actions have merited the description. I do not think a subject should be avoided just because it is deemed ""too controversial"" by some. There is certainly good reason to construct another article that is broader in tone. I'm all for that. " +Your space bar is broken? Or does it only refuse to work after full stops? Moron! LOL +Sorry, but I don't understand. As far as I know, Hōichi is neither an English loan word nor a place name. As for the with/without macron matter, there has been many discussions. Here is a major thread. +" Yes, but as long as there is no main article on Sexual differences in psychology that includes animals there is no need. It is not consistent with WP:PRECISE as long as there isn't a main article. Readers will not come here looking for animal psychology. The articles you speak of either have strong associations to animals or are about animals (ethology). (talk · contribs · email) " +" Universe Daily Thanks for the heads up. I didn't know about that charmer and his tactics. ofShalott " +wow, that's funny because you are the biggest ahole I've encountered on here. Stop harassing me. +Agent To The Stars is a progressive rock band from Rimba, Gadong, B.D. The band consisted Preston Yusof (lead vocals, guitars, piano, keyboards), Yusra Taib (bass, backup vocals), Nizam Yusof (drums, backup vocals). Early Years History The band was formed in the February 6 2008 along with Foretance by Preston Joseph, Preston formed a band in 2007 with the same members in it except Sham Bahrin after he rest off his acting career, but the band didn’t work out well, cause the band was moving really fast, and the band members still doesn’t know how to play the instruments. Preston has pursue his solo career for a try and he almost release his album but it was not succesful, and he formed a group named Foretance in February 6 2008 along with a new band named Boys Do Cry, the band consists the same members, and the band has abandoned the name of the band and performed at 4 Aces Studio without no name. Preston searched for a name in a day, the name was suppose to be name after a japanese god of destruction but it may corrupt their religion of islam. The band later posted a few novel names in the internet, and let the worldwide people vote which is the best name, there are 6 names, Mirza took Agent To The Stars (by John Scalzi), Morning Star (by Simon Raven), and more, but there are 11 votes on Agent To The Stars, which led the band to take the name. +HOPE Scholarship Thanks for your contributions to this article; however, without citations, I felt like I had to revert your changes, as I've never heard of most of what you said. Bubba Nicholson did not come up on Google, and I can't find anything regarding HOPE from 1975. I'd love to see your sources, but until you put them in the article, I'm afraid your edits don't belong in Wikipedia. Thanks for contributing, though, and I look forward to more from you in the future. |T|C| +If you think reporting me is gonna scare me you have another thing coming lol, wise up and top being so immature reporting me to a robot isn't gonna do much, I haven't been threatening you you idiot don't be so sensitive +" NYScholar, your latest comment was only 2,250 words; that hardly enough to do the issue justice, don't you think? Could you possibly expand a little on your point, say get the comment up to 5,000 words? That way we'd all have a much better chance of fully understanding what you're trying to get at. Thanks. (talk) " +". ""For the gay market"" makes no sense and seems prejudicial. Porn is not the industry term. They prefer Adult Film" +" ""I resigned because I was the subject of an SEC informal probe into my trading practices."" - I for one would probably believe Mr. Calandra's statement this time because that is exactly what happened. This statement belongs on Wiki imo." +" I have been a proponent of stronger relevancy standards at wp:npov. But having to prove ""significant"" for each piece of material is not a part of either. North8000 " +Silence of the Lambs is not a horror movie, it's a thriller, you have to learn the difference between thriller and horror. SOTL is definitely very scary thriller film, but not a horror film at all. +"::::::::::::::::I understand where you're coming from, but the complaints seem to indicate that there are cases when you do get it wrong. I've listed this particular IP at WP:OP for a check to clarify the discussion, but I still think your indef blocks here are problematic, in that they're not recommended by WP:IP, and even long blocks of a year or two should not be made unless the IP is confirmed by WP:OP to be an open proxy. I completely understand your laudable desire to prevent damage to the encyclopedia - would it be acceptable for you to, as a compromise, only block IPs you suspect to be open proxies with a shorter duration (the durations typical for vandalism edits) - unless and until WP:OP confirms that they are in fact open proxies? In those cases you can always extend the block if needed. But I'd ask that you cease with the indef blocks in any case, per WP:IP. Thanks! hi! " +" : First of all, this is not an encyclopedia, but an farce being perpetrated on the public in the name of ""free open content"" encyclopedia. Its not free and open because there are people like you playing God and deciding which piece of content stays and which doesn't, and the decision is based entirely on your beliefs and prejudices. When someone goes against these established beliefs by stating non-obvious things like the ""truth"" you dont like it and smote it down within an instant. I used to like wikipedia initially, and did make edits which were facts but the things that people (administrators) didn't like to hear were taken down. Now I just make edits for fun and waste your time. Offline, I preach against using wikipedia and I did manage to convince a few people. This is dangerous thing and should be taken down ASAP. Also, I don't need to prove anything to you. Next time I decide to play vandal, I will just use another IP. P.S: I dont deny that there is genuine vandalism, and that I have done so on some occasions. But only after my attempts to make ""valid"" contributions were reverted and" +" Can you please clarify your reasoning behind this block? What Wikipedia policies have I expressly violated that warrant a block? What pages have I edited that warrant a block? I'm assuming the block is in relation to the Windows versus Linux comparison article talk page. Have you read that page? It is full of Wikipedia policy violations by everyone involved (hence why at one point I proposed the article for deletion). Did you just block me because Jasper Deng asked you to (because he thinks I'm ""attacking"" him)?" +" first paragraph I removed a sentence which noted that this gun is ""beautifully crafted"" and is so rare that it sells for ""20,000"" or more at auction. This sentence was poorly worded and didn't cite it sources. In addition to this I don't see how someones opinion on the aesthetic qualities of this firearm or todays current sale price in USD are valuable or relevant pieces of information for an encyclopedia article" +I copied that reference link from the George H. Miley article. Are you going to delete that reference link from the Miley article too? If you do NOT, then I will put the link back into the CETI Patterson Power Cell article. +Huggle request I have been trying to figure out how to go over my drafts to check for copyright violations. The Huggle tool looks promising but requires more time on the site and lots more edits to access. Would you mind helping on my project by running the tool on the article in my sandbox and tell me how bad it is? Thanks for your hlep in advance... +GA Mal is now up for GA. +Baka, you're skating on perilously thin ice in terms of civility here. You dont want to go through it, I'm sure, so get a hold of yourself. About policy, since you seem to not have found it in spite o the fact that its liberally quoted across the discussion, here it is: The subject publicly self-identifies with the belief or preference in question The subject's beliefs or sexual preferences are relevant to the subject's notable activities or public life. For further reference: Have fun. And please, tone down the antagonism. I know I should expect no better from you, but someone else might. +"::I don't see at first sight any problem with your proposal. I could vote to keep it that way. Let's see... MauritiusXXVII (Aut Disce, Aut Doce, Aut Discede!). " +" Well I agree simpler is better. But phrases like ""sensory specific modalities"" are meaningless to people not versed in the language of NLP. barley " +"*I haven't weighed in here in a while since the arguments are all repetitious and I already said my piece. But re-reading the thread and the thinkprogress source cited above, I think we should include content about the San Diego suit b/c 1) they are pursuing a novel theory of ""public nuisance."" Apparently this is the first case like that for PCBs. (see the thinkprogress source cited above (normally I reach for major media like the NYT and shun advocacy sites on any thing controversial but this article is reasonable); 2) The background here is that per the source I just cited and per this source, the city of San Diego and the shipyards there were already found liable in court for cleanup costs for ocean dumping that the shipyards did and that the city authorized- the city is trying to find the money to pay for that with - that 2nd source says ""Attorneys from the city and the port lay some of the blame on Monsanto and see the lawsuit as a viable means of recovering costs"" . c) the yet deeper background (and this is pure SYN and we cannot use it as i have found no source linking these two) is that San Diego almost went bankrupt just a few years ago per this (this are better now per this but those folks have to be sweating bullets to stay sound). Anyway, on the basis of this novel aspect of the San Diego lawsuit, I would support adding content about the San Diego suit, with its context the city and port are trying to get money for what they are already liable for, to the article. " +well done. Way to repress the freedom of expression. lol You wikinazi. OH PLEASE DON'T BLOCK ME!! ( +How come you have not taken similar action against User:Itaqallah who started this by attacking article of my faith by putting his POVs. He also called me names which I did not. Why did you punish the reaction and not the action? +WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! (talk • contrib) +" The article needs to say what he said on stage, and currently it does not. No one reading the article will realize he said he would stab his son to death if he were gay. This is in the context of violence towards gay teens in the real world. It is not just a Facebook post saying this. It is senior folk at NBC saying ""violent imagery of Tracy's rant was disturbing to me at a time when homophobic hate crimes continue to be a life-threatening issue"". It is similar some white guy in 1944 Nashville joking about murdering a black teenager if he looks at a white woman when that was a definite possibility. Javaweb" +" Old discussions from 2003 Some Mormons argue that even assuming mainstream Christianity's definition of God's omnipotence and omniscience, not only can God exalt mortal man, but God must do so. I don't understand this sentence. I don't know what the issue is supposed to be, to which Mormons are contributing their ""argument""; I don't know what it means that God ""must"" exalt mortal man. 20:54, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC) Agreed. It is not clear what the writer meant. I have no idea who wrote it, but I'll change it. Sorry for that very brief and very confusing statement. Where it reads, omniscience, it should have read, omnibenevolence. The idea is that the Mormon meaning of deification is supported even by mainstream Christianity's definition of God's omnipotence and omnibenevolence (in contrast to Mormonism's less literal definition of God's omnipotence). Namely, if God really is omnipotent, then God can deify mortal man...and if God really is also omnibenevolent, then not only can God deify man, but God's goodness compels God to deify man. 23:36, Nov 4, 2003 (UTC) Much more clear. Thanks. 23:40, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC) This does raise a question for me; and since I argued with my wife today, and lost, concerning who should have the car this morning, I am in the mood to ask it. Should ""omnipotence"" and ""omnibenevolence"" imply, as your argument holds, that making gods out of created beings is something that God must do, then why do you not expect that every person would be exalted? For that matter, is God too small to exalt animals? vegetables? rocks or sand? Perhaps the argument assumes the same shallow and useless understanding of ""omnipotence"" and ""omnibenevolence"" as atheists do? Argumentatively yourse, 21:52, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC) I am curious. Being Orthodox, we believe that God's benevolence includes allowing mankind to have free will to choose holy ways or not, to work toward theosis or not. If it is mandantory that God exalt mortal man, what does that say for what Mormons believe about free will and why it does (or doesn't) exist? I changed the nature of God is to become the nature of Man to the nature of God is to become united with the nature of Man. This is an important distinction. This union of the two natures first took place in the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, when the two natures were joined in Christ's one person. God's divine nature is unfathomable, and will never be understood by us, much less become completely ours. Theosis is rather our participation in God's divine energies (as described/defined by Gregory Palamas) and union with His nature. We will still never be divine in quite the same way that God is divine; we will still always possess a human nature only, it's just that that human nature will be thoroughly healed and cleansed, and united with the divine nature. At least that's my current understanding. References available, and corrections remain most welcome. -) 06:23, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC) excellent 18:17, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC) Entire sanctification I'm pretty sure that it is tolerable to teach ""entire sanctification"" in the EOC; although I'm sure that it isn't a doctrine in the sense of being something necessarily believed. Therefore, I would like to remove the disclaimer sentence in the opening paragraph, which says ""but this is not a doctrine of Orthodoxy"". 16:09, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC) The ""EOC"" abbreviation threw me for a minute; my first assumption was ""Evangelical Orthodox Church"", which my local parish used to be part of until not that long ago; then I realized you probably meant ""Eastern Orthodox Church"", right? Gotta love these TLA's, especially with regard to denominations. Anyway, ""entire sanctification"" is probably one of those teachings that isn't officially affirmed or denied by Eastern Orthodoxy, in large part because the doctrine of entire sanctification was formed in a different context and in response to different questions and answers than anything Eastern Orthodoxy has really needed to directly confront. In a similar vein, I haven't been able to get a straight answer from anyone as to what Orthodoxy thinks of semi-pelagianism; closest I've come is ""Orthodoxy deals with different questions"" or ""Orthdoxy would pose the question differently, and then answer that other question like this"". Coming back to entire sanctification, the closest thing to an ""official"" position I can think of is just a story of a monk telling his abbot that he had finally ""arrived"" and was no longer experiencing +Because most Americans supported it. +" Request help with charts Hey, Hahc21. Since I know you to be a chart master I was wondering if you could find the time to take a look at the charts in the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band article. Cheers! (talk|contribs) Sure. I'll take a look this weekend. Ping me on Saturday night just to make sure I don't forget ) → Call me 21 Ping. (talk|contribs) Ping. (talk|contribs) Thanks for pinging, . I did take a look on Sunday night but I've been extremely busy in RL and have not had time to edit or do almost anything wiki-wise. Since these chart positions are from almost 50 years ago, I think that most of them will be documented on books. However, the European ones should be available at Hung Medien, but I'm not sure. I'll take another look thos week if RL permits. → Call me 21 Hola -) Hola Hahc21, vengo a pedirte ayuda, como eres el único que habla español xD. Se trata del usuario Tprg, ya le he dejado varios mensajes e incluso le dejaron una advertencia y el usuario parece no entender, se la pasa creando posibles artículos de telenovelas que ni han sido confirmadas, lo único que se sabe de cada artículo que el crea son los nombres confirmados + no hay certeza de que estás telenovelas sean transmitidas o no, pueden o no ser canceladas ¿Quién sabe?; ya ha creado estos artículos: No Abras la Puerta‎, La Otra (2015 telenovela)‎, Luisana Mia (2014 telenovela)‎, Buscando a María , Caleta El Sol, Chipe Libre, Mi Querido Dilema. Hace días hizo una recreación de artículos borrados como Mi Corazón es Tuyo y Hasta el Fin del Mundo, que otro bibliotecario le borró, esto es algo ya cansante, no se puede estar abriendo una consulta de borrado para cada artículo que este usuario crea. Por eso pido que se tome esto en cuenta, lo único que hace es ignorar los mensajes que se les deja, y yo no pienso seguir dejandoles mensajes. Saludos y gracias ). TALK2ME Triple Crown Hey Hahc, what's the process for receiving a triple crown award? I think I am eligible with Jim Thome (FA), any of several GAs, and any of several DYKs. Thanks. Phightins! Hey! Follow the instructions here: WP:TRIPLE/NOM, and I'll be giving you the Crown soon. Remember to check for which Crown you apply (it appears on the main TC page). → Call me 21 Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Character notability (for full articles) Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Character notability (for full articles). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — POTD notification [[File:Enterprise free flight.jpg|thumb|100px|right|[[Wikipedia:Picture of the day/June 2014#Ju +- willing to support this User:Netoholic add to the story +Okay.. I get It. Please unblock +The company appears in the List of cars article (see under Myanmar), an article I have been helping to expand for months. This simply adds more information. If you still think it should be deleted, please proceed. +"Talk:Jack Abramoff/Archive 2 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Talk:Jack Abramoff TABThis is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. Contents [hide] 1 COPYVIO 1.1 Tyco 2 COPYVIO 2.1 Tyco 3 The Indian tribes scandal 4 The email trail 5 Isn't abramoff conected to the murder of a florida man too? 6 should we mention John Doolittle and the Nor Cal Morman cabal? 7 Ronnie Earle started investigation? 8 Ronnie Earle seems to be the guy 9 better pic need one that doesn't violated copyrights 10 better info+can we use this pic?....please? 11 new stuff 12 The murder indictment 13 Removal of speedy deletion tag. 14 Attempt to delete important facts 15 NPOV 16 news on his ex-partner 17 Speculation on guilty plea 18 Remove fraudster cat 19 can we use this? 20 Mental health treatments? 21 useful links 22 they can run... 23 Osama Bin Laden, Mohamed Atta, and Abramoff 24 Education 25 Needs Revision in Light of 1/04/06 Guilty Plea 26 Lobbyist works 27 Byron Dorgan 28 Israel-Palestine 29 Donations to Republicans and Democrats 30 Intro removal by Phase1 31 Proposed rewrite 32 Proposed rewrite Reinventing a Wheel anywhere? 33 Please stop the insanity 33.1 Simplistic scenario for those who lack the sense referred to as common 34 Unexplained deletion of Party Affiliation 35 Representative #1 ? 36 Religion 37 Revert war about a Juan Cole link 38 Religion & Israel- Striking a ballance 39 ""Pleaded"" vs. ""Pled"" 40 Rewrite! 41 Transition Team 42 Request to lock 43 Contributions to Congress 44 ummmmmmm..... FACT CHECK 45 NPOV Dispute re: ""Connection to Israel-Palestine"" 46 The Secret of NIMH 47 early post 48 useful? 49 2000 Election Recount 50 Clean out massive anon mess 51 Again with the Jewish & Israel remarks 52 Watching the Jew-Hatred on the Abramoff page 53 How is it you ask 54 We should put aside our differences and unite against our real enemy... 55 mentioning religion 56 A change 57 RFC on Brad/85.250.193.168 58 Israel connection to (sniper?) training school 59 BLOCKING OUT THE JEWISH EDITORS 60 The Indian tribes scandal 61 The email trail 62 Isn't abramoff conected to the murder of a florida man too? 63 should we mention John Doolittle and the Nor Cal Morman cabal? 64 Ronnie Earle started investigation? 65 Ronnie Earle seems to be the guy 66 better pic need one that doesn't violated copyrights 67 better info+can we use this pic?....please? 68 new stuff 69 The murder indictment 70 Removal of speedy deletion tag. 71 Attempt to delete important facts 72 NPOV 73 news on his ex-partner 74 Speculation on guilty plea 75 Remove fraudster cat 76 can we use this? 77 Mental health treatments? 78 useful links 79 they can run... 80 Osama Bin Laden, Mohamed Atta, and Abramoff 81 Education 82 Needs Revision in Light of 1/04/06 Guilty Plea 83 Lobbyist works 84 Byron Dorgan 85 Israel-Palestine 86 Donations to Republicans and Democrats 87 Intro removal by Phase1 88 Proposed rewrite 89 Proposed rewrite Reinventing a Wheel anywhere? 90 Please stop the insanity 90.1 Simplistic scenario for those who lack the sense referred to as common 91 Unexplained deletion of Party Affiliation 92 Representative #1 ? 93 Religion 94 Revert war about a Juan Cole link 95 Religion & Israel- Striking a ballance 96 ""Pleaded"" vs. ""Pled"" 97 Rewrite! 98 Transition Team 99 Request to lock 100 Contributions to Congress 101 ummmmmmm..... FACT CHECK 102 NPOV Dispute re: ""Connection to Israel-Palestine"" 103 The Secret of NIMH 104 early post 105 useful? 106 2000 Election Recount 107 Clean out massive anon mess 108 Again with the Jewish & Israel remarks 109 Watching the Jew-Hatred on the Abramoff page 110 How is it you ask 111 We should put aside our differences and unite against our real enemy... 112 mentioning religion 113 A change 114 RFC on Brad/85.250.193.168 115 Israel connection to (sniper?) training school 116 BLOCKING OUT THE JEWISH EDITORS COPYVIO This article and it's sister screed are embarrassments to wikipedia. They're essentially the same and both reflect the authors politocal hatred and zeal. Both also have severe irredemable copyright problems and are and emba +Can someone include a discussion of Martin Noth? He is a major figure in traditio-historical development. I feel he deserves mentions. +" Oh I see, so it just shouldn't be in the ""List"" section. " +I do agree the image is not correct (I am from the Eastern Province). I was just not quite sure if it was ok, under NASA's copyright policy, to edit the image and still claim the policy applies to it. If it is OK, it should be mirrored (rotation is not necessary, I think). amn +So where is lisp+prolog+erlang? Honestly, I understand teh aphorism well, as I code in scheme, layered on top of a C++ structure that is prolog-like. And would like to have erlang or scala (programming language)-like features. What language *should* I code in? Does this language exist? +copied to MediaWiki talk:Undo-summary +", 4 March 2014 (UTC) | decline = Pretty clear WP:SPA. Making two edits that don't involve your blog doesn't make this not an SPA. Talk 02:22" +" Who lives in Meredith's house: I've had to edit this several times over the past few days, and different individuals keep changing it back. In assuming good faith, I will guess that these are individuals who have not yet been able to watch the full third season. However, as of episode 3x18, ""Scars and Souvenirs"", which has aired in the United States and Canada, Alex Karev is a resident of Meredith Grey's home. George had moved out prior to episode 3x15 ""Walk on Water"", leaving his room vacant as he moved into the Archfield Hotel with his new wife, Callie Torres. Alex moved in and took residence of the room that George once lived in. The rent paying housemates are Alex and Izzie, not Izzie and George." +The hostage is a bit of a puzzler. On one hand, his month is up. On the other, he didn't get a month. On one hand, he didn't really do anything notable, played a passive role. On the other, Kayla Mueller was a similar sort and her article passed an AfD. On the other other hand, I don't think anyone will look for potential redlink articles on a page without redlinks, so it doesn't really serve much noticeboard purpose. I think I lean toward deleting his entry entirely, but if anyone wants to try creating an article, here's a redlink. (talk) 06:34, April 24, 2015 (UTC) +" POTD notification ]] Hi Bob, Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:F40ferarri20090509.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 3, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-10-03. —'''''' {chat} " +Please do not spam your link, see Wikipedia:Spam. +attacking people anymore okay? +Why won't you leave me alone? Why do you keep stalking me??? Get over yourself, leave me alone and quit posting messages on my talk. I don't want to have anything to do with you and don't give a shit what you do to whatever article you feel obsessively compelled to edit. Do what you want but by the GODDESS leave me alone. +" Year Winner 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 " +Cornea Transplant Surgery An eye is considered to be one of the most important part of the human body. Eyes are organs that perceive light and forms a communication with the brain providing all the necessary data. The brain then processes the raw data and acts accordingly. An eye is a complex component of the human body comprising of various and sensitive minute parts. A transparent front part of the eye that acts a protection shield for the iris and pupil is cornea. Sensitivity, transparency and presence of immune cells make cornea a very special tissue. Cornea transplant surgery is an operational method in which a damaged cornea is replaced by donated corneal tissue. It is very much admissible to consult a trained cornea surgeon in India and expert for successful cornea transplant surgeries. Corneal Transplantation Corneal transplantation surgery, a process in which damaged corneal tissues are replaced, is also referred to as corneal transplant. It is one of the most successful organ transplantation surgeries in the world. Replacement of cornea can restore completely or partially lost vision, reduce pain and improve the efficiency of cornea. Also known as keratoplasty, the transplantation surgery is considered as successful sight saving operation for improves the optical quality of cornea. Some of the conditions that might require cornea transplantation include malfunctioning of cornea’s inner layers, keratoconus (bulging or change in shape of cornea), swelling in cornea and tissue growth in cornea. Occasionally corneal transplantation surgery is combined with various refractive surgeries, cataract surgeries and many such surgeries. Owing to technological developments and medical advancements, the number of corneal transplantation surgeries in India has increased subsequently providing sustained protection from cornea diseases. Donor Corneal Tissue Corneal transplantation includes replacement of damaged or diseased cornea by donor corneal tissue. A thorough evaluation of donor cornea is essential for the success of corneal transplantation surgery. Due to latest inventions in the field of medical science, today a single donor cornea is divided into 3 parts and is used in different patients for improving visual acuity. Detailed screening of human donor cornea during transplantation of cornea ensures successful transplantation surgery. However there are many risks involved in the surgery. These risks are relatively very small but they can cause hazardous effects if the surgery is not done under proper care. Some complications that could occur are bleeding, eye infection, increased sensitivity to light, rejection of new cornea, increased redness of the eye and many such dangerous complications. Hence it is always advisable to consult a cornea disease treatment specialist for successful treatment of cornea disorders. Recognized eye bank in India and renowned centre of cornea disorder treatment offers keratoplasty, keratoconus, corneal edema and cornea transplantation surgery in India. Contact specialist cornea surgeon for treatment of various corneal disorders through advanced methods. Dr. Vinay Agarwal provides treatment for corneal disorders and restoring full eye vision through corneal transplant surgery in India including transplant of donor corneal tissues. +Joseph Stalin Please stop adding unsourced nonsense to Wikipedia, like you did here. Stalin was a Marxist and obviously wouldn't support a fascist in Germany. +" I'd pretty much figured that. I'll be careful, I promise. ) lives in the Orphanage " +Talk:Community Charge Hey, could you chime in and let us know how you feel about the nominator's reply to your comment? (let's chat) +Welcome! Hello, CourtneyBradshaw84, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!   WikHead +" GMO Arb case Hi - just checking on progress on the PD for the GMO case. Wondering if you and might have an updated ETA? 4th " +" hello again. I don't know why you added them; are they really singles? Or non-singles? Please explain it. Thank you. T " +On December 26, 2004, Kennet Andersson killed by tsunami in Thailand. +, you're also a fucking shit, The reason is sending warning to bad editors. +wikipedia email hello. did you send this to me via email? Man, if you want to edit wikipedia you're going to have to play nice with other editors. There are ways of resolving disputes without the animosity. If you keep it up, you could find yourself blocked from editing. Just trying to help. I know you can do useful things here, but not if you get yourself blocked. if so, why? based on what? for what purpose? if not, please ignore/delete. thanks. +Anybody know anything about what the accent was intended to be? Sounds mostly U.S., but I gather it's not Sirtis's normal accent. Any linguists? xx +Don't you think this: {{db-vandalism}} {{db-author}} Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart.Tajin is smart. He is smart. is a bit strange, see also +" Blocked I've extended your block to a week, because I think 24 hours is too lenient here. You've clearly been using at least three accounts to stack votes at ITN (if not elsewhere) and so obciously that it's almost as if you wanted to get blocked. Your actions have shown contempt for consensus and the community in a manner that I've almost never seen before. That you did this at ITN, where things are so much more laid back than in many parts of the project, makes this abuse even more shocking, which is the reason I've extended your block. I will say the following once, and once only: if you ever particiapte in the same discussion on Wikipedia under two identities, logged in or not, in an attempt to stack votes, I will block you indeifnitely and make a motion for a community ban. If I were you, I would be spending the next week reflecting on how I could regain the trust of the community, but if you attempt to evade this block, you will be met with equally stiff sanctions. | Penny for your thoughts? Some of your DYK hooks which you verified yourself with your sockpuppets are listed at Wikipedia talk:DYK#BabbaQ's sockpuppets.  • XAЯAbИAM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.123.137 Talkback '''''' (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. " +South Dakota/Toonami? Hey man, as both a resident of South Dakota, and a fan of Toonami from 'back-in-the-day', I wanted to ask you a couple of questions. I'm very curious; are you from South Dakota? And also, did you work for/with Toonami? If those are too personal questions, I apologize. It's just your name and recent post about Toonami possibly getting its own channel intrigued me. Anyway, take care, +"Unobjective and tendentious edits== The issue of feylis etymological ethnical identity is unresolved. Iranian wiki members such as ""علی ساکی لرستانی"" have engaged in full scale editing and publishing obviously tendentious sources on this article. If the origin of feylis is contested, it is unreasonable to edit entire articles and break wikipedias objectivity standards to suit your own POV. Here by any edits to this article that do not follow wikipedias directives, without the consent of the consensus on the talk page of this article, is subject removal. ==" +Turkey Tours Cosmopolitan cities brimming with modern delights, archaeological sites filled with ancient splendour, curious landscapes straight out of a storybook and picture-perfect coastlines frequented by the jet set… this is tantalising Turkey! Visitors won't be able to forget travelling through this exotic land which sits at the crossroads of Asia and Europe, yet displays a fair bit of Middle Eastern flair. +for rotos and peruans stop taking our culture!! we will have our revenge. chile is the crap of south america, and peru is a worthless country that likes to steal things. go Bolivia BOLIVIA BOLIVIA!!!! +" MrColonelCortez Big Sean's page says ""Kanye West"" why is that there? Please tell me that." +Hm, your edit deleted the explanation of where I got the SSN from. Then you note that I had more than the birthdate, as if that were not something I already told you. Also, it is not illegal to inquire into someone's claimed degree.I think I see now why you guys have it in for Bullshido. We call bullshit; you are all about bullshit not called. +Stop leaving obscene comments on my page I don't agree with you on your Holocaust Denial, I'm Jewish. Please just leave me alone, I've been pretty tolerant about all of this since half my family was killed in the Holocaust. I am going to delete all your offensive comments from my talk page, please do not revert the changes or make any further changes to my talk page. +(I don't think the syntax of this 2nd request was correct and so am editing it) +WPCD Hi. Hope (and trust) the weather is a bit better where you are. Several things: the 0.5 plus images has been grabbed and put up here: http://wikipedia-release-version-0.5.fixedreference.org/ and our 2007 list (which is much longer) is at http://2007-wikipedia-cd-selection.fixedreference.org/wp/index/alpha.htm Also to let you know about Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2006_Wikipedia_CD_Selection. The current marginal majority to move the page to Wikipedia space. This makes some sense but practically far fewer people will ever see the CD releases if we always put them in project place (the internal search on Wikipedia excludes project pages) and I think there is enough notability now to make the case... talk +But I really don't think there is any harm in leaving the content in for the time being. I don't think it will cause any problems in the world! +" You're welcome, and congratulations! (talk) " +If only we could get the article to follow that advice... +" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Robin Hood: Men in Tights. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Leave it as it is for now - you've got the article established. Well done. +" ""there's nothing particularly unique about the incident concerning Luis and Salvador"" < lol, did you type that with a straight face?" +No, this is not needed In fact, there is another article titled restriction fragment. There should not be seperate articles for the singular and plural forms of the subject. 151.188.17.247 +This agrees with epidemiology in which Manganese concentrations at scrapie-affected sites were 2.5 times those of adjoining areas. +The difference between holomorphic and non-holomorphic Eisenstein series should be explained in the article. +If there's already a consensus at the article, you won't need to do all the reverting yourself; other users interested in the topic will be able to make them, too. Then you will avoid 3RR. If there isn't any consensus yet, build it there through discussion and, if necessary, dispute resolution. If the user repeatedly edit wars against consensus and will not work to resolve the dispute, the user can then be sanctioned. (Disclaimer: I know very little about the subject matter, as I'm not British and thus don't know much about the political parties of the UK other than Conservative and Labour, so I won't be any help in this respect.) (talk) +As I noted on your talk page, I reverted your edits to the Badlydrawnjeff arbitration case pages. Please do not edit arbitration case pages after the case is closed. We discussed this courtesy blanking and are discussing others on the Arbitration Committee mailing list. Thanks for your interest. Take care, +REDIRECT Talk:Airport (Biman Bandar) railway station +It's a new organization. Do you have any reason to believe otherwise?68.1.89.162 +If I was getting any, I'd be a bit more relaxed, but since I'm not you pay the price! +Well, I just use it as appearence in original page. +" I am a plastic surgeon and treat up to 8 gynecomastia patients a day from around the world. I have been dealing with helping the public learn about this condition for now more than 30 years. Dealing with so many gynecomastia patients, it is hard to express their frustration with the public just not understanding the problem. The anger is intense and most cannot express themselves why they feel so stressed out about their problem. I put a video of a particularly eloquent patient describing his living with gynecomastia up to help family and others understand the Emotion Behind Gynecomastia. Unfortunately there is noting like hearing the stress in the human voice to emphasize the emotional component, it would have been nice to show the face, but then I would not have been permitted to share his experience. I added it as a reference as I thought it was the best way to show that such details were available to those trying to deal with this problem. Public phrases like those listed puffy nips also include ""bitch tits"" but I did not know if that was permitted here. So many just do not recognize gynecomastia but the lay phases added. Non-surgical compression garments have been a major source of stress relief for those waiting to see if their gynecomastia would resolve on its own, or were dealing with losing weight, or just could not afford surgery. This link is to examples of how effective / not effective garments can be for real life sufferers of gynecomastia. Fat people still look fat but the bouncing is stabilized. Many have told me of the differences the garments have made their lives. The parents of one 14 year old child from Trinidad told me he was a different person just from use of the garment while waiting the year his endocrinologist wanted for his medical condition to stabilize. The actual surgery made a greater difference. Gynecomastia comes in so many differnt forms that the limited pictures just does not tell the story well at all. The Gynecomastia Gallery link is a much more comprehensive method of demonstrating the problem. Hope the additions were according to form. " +" ACTA, SOPA, and Media Conflict of Interest I'm writing you, because if I read correctly the history of the ACTA article, you reverted an addition I had made claiming the media have a conflict of interest in this issue. A few minutes ago, I added a section to Talk:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement regarding Media Conflict of Interest. I'm quite confused by your reversion, because (a) the definition of a ""conflict of interest"" seems to me to make this point quite clear without a citation, (b) I provided a link to conflict of interest#Media where this issue is discussed in greater detail with substantive citations to appropriate academic quality literature, and (c) the points I made should hardly classify as original research. If you have a chance, please reply on Media Conflict of Interest. Thanks, " +Ummm.. ... do you realise that you added your comment on WP:AN/I to a section where I was directly quoting others? Your comment now makes it look like I quoted you from the talk page of Islamofascism. You might want to move it. - +Displays just fine on Safari on Mac OS. It also displays fine for me on FireFox (again, on Mac OS). +" You are adding unsourced content and stating that a film is propaganda. My edit erroneously restored a version missing ""a"", so add the a. Grammar errors are not detrimental to an article, but reporting opinion as fact is about the worst thing we can possibly do. Don't keep reverting to your unsourced, non-neutral claim about the film being propaganda just because of a small typo. (tock talk) " +I don't think I stooped to his level. I had discussed the matter of the IPAs with other editors and I believe we came to a consensus that the IPAs were not needed for naturalized words that are frequently used. The admins seem to ignore this. +Dzien dobry Mr. Goethean... dont make me scan some of the more colorful Deomocratic Flyers I have received from The Duckworth campaign... I live in the sixth district and have a nice collection WP:SENSE as well as Tit for Tat. Don't do it...dont set this precedent Do widzenia +" Read the policy page... What you're doing is unacceptable, and a failure to understand that is not going to let you get away with it. You can't approach a group, no matter who they are, and say ""hey, go to x and vote y. I notice you've also done it on user talk pages. Stop it, now. " +Page Deletion Query You recently deleted a userpage, claiming the page was full of advertising. I always thought that the user pages were designed for a little bit of knowledge about yourself. After browsing other user pages, which had the same written based content as my deleted page did, I ask you...why did you delete my page when there are plenty of other pages containing much worse content and are still up? (PS. the page you deleted on the 9th April was called user:UniverSearleStudios +date = 16 February 2012 (UTC) | result = redirect to Microsoft Expression Studio | page = Creature House +Camelus ferus? I thought the Bactrian camel was Camelus ferus?? +notice how its always the jews and pro israel editors who are violating wikipedia rules in a sorry attempt to deny arab culture and create legitimacy for the zionist entity. +" Harassment I'm getting some serious harassment from IMOS warriors. We should gang up together like those 2 then go page to page applying ""our"" version of IMOS. Wouldn't that be fun, then tag team revert any opposition, then report them to ANI then keep on molesting wikipedia to push our own POV." +" Image:AF IITYECYM.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:AF IITYECYM.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ╦╩ " +" The Virginian-Pilot June 11, 2004: ""The encyclopedia's descriptions of other South Hampton Roads cities includes information on the 1989 Virginia Beach Greekfest riot. Even that description is debatable. ""Many people predicted a riot weeks in advance, and this came to pass,"" according to the encyclopedia. ""Unbiased observers suggest that the city went out of its way to make the students feel unwelcome; that the students rioted not out of anger, but out of a simple greed for the clothing displayed in the shops along the boardwalk; and that the police were out of control, attacking anyone who was black, looter or not.""" +Kosova was NEVER Serbia Look, if Kosova was in Serbia, Serbia would have never invaded it, and the west would not have driven them out would they. Noel Malcolm's article is precise that in 1912, Serbia occupied Kosova. It was not a liberattion because the 75% then-Albanian majority never welcomes them. It stayed occupied until it joined Yugoslavia in which it and Serbia were federal counties. This is sourced everywhere, so why do Serbo-nationaliosts continuously revert these edits??? +Perform a fine job on my eager member== I assure you, my seed is considered wegetarian if you will please swallow it all. Then you may gratify your own needs, and consume your own curry scented seed. Thank you please! == +"::I'm not. This goes way beyond the topic of family. " +Criticisms== This page offers no criticisms of MADD! == +It's all a question of WP:DUE. Generally I think that the few countries that are lucky to be megadiverse deserve to have their wildlife mentioned, but otherwise it is more debatable. I suggest that you create the page Wildlife of Trinidad and Tobago, and subsequently nominate it for WP:DYK. After the whole fleshed out article is seen we can see what's appropriate for this article. +click me and keep off my page, powertripper. +Dialect of English? A good section of this article is written in UK English; it also contains US English. It should standardize/standardise on one dialect only. +Edits October 19, 2015 Added WWI and WWII information based on U.S. Army Center of Military History - http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/cbtchron/cc/035id.htm and Museum of the Kansas Nation Guard - http://www.kansasguardmuseum.org/dispunit.php?id=7. Additions include WWI: activation and inactivation dates, major operations, casualty statistics and commanding officers. WWII: Additions include WWI: activation and inactivation dates, award statistics, commanding officers, and assignments in the ETO. +I see! Thanks for dropping by! Most interesting. I keep meaning to have a read up about sex and gender, because it's obvious even to me that they are rather more complicated than male or female, man or woman. Cheers! +Cyber Demon I have met many citizens who agree with the existence of the Cybedemon. How dare you disgrace his eroticism you fucking cunt. +Try arguing with facts. Twice this page has been fought over. Both times, you flounced, then came back and changed the page. I say leave the page as it is, ban Ellis, Peters, IPs, from the page. 13:52, 20 July 2006 +Correct mistakes? The repeated deletion without warning of my in-progress article stub was destructive to the Wikipedia community spirit, and I'm glad that the perpetrator decided on further reflection to insert a warning of possible deletion instead. The deleter made mistakes; corrected the mistakes; life goes on. However, the demeaning tone used, and threats to blocking the contributor, live on. When will that mistake be corrected? I suggest an apology. +"::Do I have to repeat ? 1. Karadžić was/is esteemed as an ethnographer, reformer of Serbian langauge and culture, as well as folklorist. 2. Karadžić's work consisted, among other things, in misappropriation of Croatian cultural heritage 8the balald ""Hasanaginica"", first published by Fortis, has nothig to do with Serbs-or, Bosnian Muslims, for that matter. It is a purely croatian song which VK ""sold"" as a ""Serbian song"".) Also, his work in lexicography is unthinkable without Croatian heritage-for instance, in his 1847 translation of the New Testament, he explicitely stated he had coined ca. 300 new words. Later investigations http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~vbockho/vbockhopublikationen.htm have shown that Vuk has simply took more than 90% of his ""new words"" from Joakim Stulli's Croatian dictionary. 3. but, it's the ideology that matters. Starčević had completely unmasked Karadžić's myth on štokavians-Serbs. And this part of Karadžić's ideology is what even contemporary Croatian linguists find reprehensible: http://www.matica.hr/MH_Periodika/vijenac/1999/135/tekstovi/08.htm, http://www.matica.hr/MH_Periodika/vijenac/1999/138/tekstovi/06.htm " +'fraid I can't do the restore, but I'd be happy to send it off to AfD. +Hi. Thanks for all your input! What would be the correct way of going about making sure that the pictures are not questioned regarding the copyright status? This would be helpful for other wikipedia users to know. Thanks! +Odd that no sources were found for this, it sounds like a hilarious game. Anyway, there's a copy for you at +" To be comprehensive, the article has to be long. Do you mind offering to explain what parts of the article should be omitted? Otherwise, please reconsider your vote. Thank you. t " +Dont worry, its only wikipedia.... +Not Really The large Metropolitan trains do share tracks with the small Picadilly line trains, but they are both trains, not a tram and a train. +Request to Crimsone - Please desist in further vandalism Crimsone, I must request that you abide by the Wikipedia rules that you seem to hold so dear - stop vandalizing this page. As we have discussed, it is important to have a balanced article, which I have attempted to provide. Your attempts to squelch this attempt at neutrality are acts of vandalism. The fact that you have gained an accomplice through the heavily biased left-wing beliefs of Rombik (who has also vandalized this page) does not change a thing. If you question Rombik's bias, then I request that you take a brief look at his history - especially a comment that he made insulting an individual who diagreed with him on hate crime laws. +" Pop culture needs to be referenced before returning The television series New York Undercover used the study as the subject of a second-season episode titled ""Bad Blood"". Marvel Comics' limited series Truth: Red, White & Black reinterpreted the Tuskegee Experiment as part of the Weapon Plus program.Black in Action, Entertainment Weekly Ralph Ellison in his book Invisible Man makes allusions to the Tuskeegee study. In the 1998 film Half Baked, Dave Chappelle's character tells a doctor that gives him marijuana that his grandfather was a part of the Tuskegee experiments. Gil Scott-Heron's song ""Tuskegee 626"" On the television show, ""House"", Dr. Cameron references Tuskegee as a brutal, inhumane study." +and John Carter you should be ashamed of yourself. You aren't going to last long as an admin with your decision making capabilities. +" I was saying the same thing, but forgot to write the ""NOT""" +Mdann52, thank you again. I am sorry to see that one of my cyber stalkers has retaliated against you as well. I noticed that right after you relisted a discussion, he just went ahead and closed the discussion anyway before anyone else could even comment. Shameful. I am sorry to see you blown of and insulted in such a way, especially by someone totally ignorant of the subject matter. +" thanks for your help. I agree that ""he may be facing up to two years for what he has been charged with"", in which case this entire section is (probably fallacious) WP:ORIG synthesis. It behooves Wikipedia not to misreport facts. The synthesis described here may well not be the offense for which Mr Weston is to be prosecuted, especially given the distinction between six (Emeraude says) and 24 months (Weston says). 66.185.200.1 " +i will get some administrators later to talk about this webpage +" i think the issue with this ""average human being"" vs. ""you"" thing is one of writing a techinical or descriptive article (as opposed to a short story or a ""how too"" article or something similar) is the use of the ""second person"". it is often frowned on by the profs i had in college to put in personal pronouns into a techinical or descriptive article. it's a matter of style, i agree, but i also think that the use of personal pronouns can almost always be avoided. " +" Triple Crown to Crisco 1492 for his impressive work on good and featured content on Indonesian topics, and in general for all his contributions to the English Wikipedia. Well done sir, Genghis Khan himself would be jealous of your achievements. — 21 ]]" +" Stay tuned. EndlessDan " +Bracket Bot Is Evil Jonesy, please don't come between me and Bracket bot. We have a long checkered history and I want deactivate his circuits like a clown hates elephants. I understand you're simply trying to maintain a semblance of decency in an otherwise chaotic ocean of edits. But I want bracket bot to fear me as a human being, that I may one day remove his circuits. +Also, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. +Put 'em put 'em you hermit crab lovin gekko photographing homun72.221.92.43 culus. +" Hello ). Okay, now I understand fully what you mean. Sorry if it took you a few tries, the Japanese databases are tricky S. So yes I guess until we can find reliable surces claiming Japanese sales we gotta stick with these. Thanks for the help! D • Talk " +" STOP VANDALIZING Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.246.37.90 The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. " +(I'm not a regular registered contributor here but you can email me at kiwicupache gmail com +Hey TheOriginalSoni - I don't appreciate your unsupported accusations. +Grandness of President Well, while I lived over there I used to be a member of the Australian Wine Club of Edmonton, and we always referred to the title as Grand President, but if you really don't like it, i don't mind if you change it back, its just a title anyway!. +Michi-Ohio State talk page Thank you for contributing to the ongoing discussion at the Mich-OSU rivalry talk page. Please note that I have read your comments and responded. +":This topic was created by me, the very ""done"" or ""archive"" should I make or any wiki administrator rather than someone else. " +on your face and in your ass. +REDIRECT Talk:John West (priest) +According to national regulations in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, US crosswalks are required to have white stripes. Colored pavement between the stripes is optional, as long as it isn't yellow or any other color restricted for a specific purpose. Other countries could have different standards. Triskele Jim +Also, note that whether you can be granted rollback rights depends on what you do at Wikipedia, not on external considerations such as how well you do at school or in boy scouts. +Sorry Pdfpdf for not responding sooner, have been proccupied with the ladies. - Hi Newm30. I'm not sure exactly what your reply means, but if it means what I think it means, there's no need to apologise - real interaction with real humans is ALWAYS a higher priority than Wikipedia! Cheers, +ACS you are either another blackjack sock or as deluded as John Leach a lonely unemployed man with disability issues living in north Yorks. And I am an ACS member, have appeared in Wisden and was, until I resigned, the editor of a respected cricket journal. You on the other hand are part of a community of anonymous creeps who are too mental to use their own names. Remember that is who you are. 96 percent is unread +Hi. I agree with you but, first, read talk in Vista Tecnologie and VideoVista thanks. +" Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2014 The article currently states: There is no scientific evidence for the effectiveness of Ayurvedic medicine for the treatment of any disease. There are a few issues with this statement that make it unsuitable: An absolute negative is, of course, impossible to prove, and quite a high hurdle to even support reasonably well. There are countless examples, including some mentioned in both the cited article and this Wikipedia article, of ways that Ayurvedic treatments have been effective at treating an assortment of diseases. The cited article includes 5 examples. (Many statements about the efficacy of Ayurveda concentrate on major disorders. But, eczema, as one minor example, is a disease which is readily treated by Ayurveda. So, it may be appropriate to state that there is a lack of evidence showing its efficacy for treating ""certain diseases"", there is no way to support the claim that there is no scientific evidence as to its effectiveness in treating ""any disease"".) If there were strong evidence supporting the likelihood that ""no scientific evidence"" existed, then it may be a suitable statement. But, such an strong statement requires strong support. The only supporting evidence is one article which is not an academically rigorous source, and which, itself, offers 5 examples of scientific evidence supporting that certain Ayurvedic medicine is effective at treating certain disorders. The statement that ""there is no scientific evidence [...]"" is a claim, and not a supported fact. For this claim to stand, it should be better supported. Or, it might better be reworded. I propose that the above claim be replaced by: Though some studies suggest the efficacy of some Ayurvedic treatment for certain conditions, the science is inclusive as to the efficacy of Ayurveda as a complete system of treatment. This statement is supportable and non-controversial. I may come up with a list of disorders with supporting evidence as to Ayurvedic efficacy to broaden the claim that Ayurvedic treatments have been shown to be effective at treating certain conditions. However, in the interim, I think there is sufficient cause to remove the claim that there is absolutely none unless such a statement could be at least strongly supported. " +Satanizer Thanks for the censorship! 66.55.141.100 +Reply That comment always comes from stupid americans who cannot visualise a world outside their borders. +Don't listen to this dirty kraut. +Siddhackra Hi Nizil, I was quite happy to edit Siddhachakra. The lead section could probably be expanded a little, perhaps a sentence or two describing it and its history. If you were to write those I would be happy to copy edit them. +Yu0r whole 0rganizashun is retarded Eat me. +Cheers. No, not the infobox; we've got the best sourced one there, though there are enigmas about its derivation. +" For starters, I'm not the first person here to disagree with the term ""spinoff."" Would you call the console version of The Sims 2 a spinoff of the PC version? (talk|Contribs) " +Heads up Thanks for reverting that vandalism to Mario. I know the guy who did it - he is a classmate of mine. He hates Mario and Nintendo for no reason and wants more people to hate it too. +I wouldn't say its any more ghoulish than listing deaths in the first place. But it is cumbersome. Initiative should always be encouraged, but in this case it was perhaps slightly misplaced. 212.183.134.130 Captain celery +" WikiProject Birds March newsletter Archives  |  Tip Line The Birds WikiProject NewsletterMarch 2009 Articles of note ]] New good articles: Whitefish Point Bird Observatory (January 25) – with apologies for not including it last month Rufous-crowned Sparrow (February 13) Article statistics Project news needs you...]] Our first collaboration article for 2009 is Cockatoo—a well-known Australasian family of parrots. The article is already in reasonable shape, thanks to early efforts by a number of contributors, and with a little more work, we should be able to get it to GA/FA status. Can we get our first ""group star"" for the year on this one? On a related note, be sure to vote for April's collaboration article, which will be chosen on March 31. If none of the existing nominations interest you, consider adding a new one! Please be sure to mark any featured lists as FL-class rather than FA-class. All of our current featured lists have been moved into this new(ish) category. Beginning in April, we'll be removing from our ""active participants"" list the name of any editor who hasn't edited on Wikipedia for 6 months or more, putting them instead into a ""retired editors"" section. (Please note that will be easy to move yourself back into the active category if you start editing again after an extended absence.) This should help us to better evaluate our project's editor retention and make for more efficient newsletter delivery. Videos We all know the old adage ""A picture is worth a thousand words."" And if that's true, videos are probably worth 10,000! They're a great way to add information to articles—for instance by showing behaviours that are hard to explain with text or static pictures. They can also include audio, adding a dimension unavailable in a photo. If you don't have your own video camera, you can still help the project by finding and requesting videos from others who have already taken them (checking, for example, at Flickr, YouTube or The Internet Bird Collection). If you have questions about how to upload videos, several project members, including or , may be able to help. Newsletter challenge took up the last newsletter's challenge, and started our article about distraction displays—behaviors used by birds to lure or drive potential predators away from nests or young. This month, we're looking for someone to start an article about acoustical luring, which is a method used by some predatory birds to lure potential prey into reach. The person who creates this article and gets it beyond a mere stub level will be mentioned in the next newsletter.Got a suggestion? A correction? Something you'd like to see included in a future issue? Drop a note at the Tip Line with your ideas!To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This has been an automated delivery by ''' talk +It's a bit much ... ... when I have to post my own block notices. 01:14, 5 November 2009 Georgewilliamherbert (talk | contribs) blocked Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours ‎ (Personal attacks or harassment: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff;=prev&oldid;=324002285) Sloppy admining I call it. lol: Fatuorum +" Reviews and meta-analyses...get your secondary sources, folks! There are 398 papers that fall under the ""Reviews"" tab at PubMed on the query ""Homeopathy"" (out of 3545 total papers). Below are a selection of interesting papers (that my institution can access) from the last couple of years, with money-quotes from abstract conclusions. I stopped after a couple dozen, travelling back to ~2002; this list isn't close to exhaustive, but it may prove useful for discussion & article building. Any responses should probably be made in a new section, or a subsection of this one, just for navigational clarity. There is currently little evidence for the efficacy of homeopathy for the treatment of ADHD. ...some homeopathically prepared remedies show promise for reducing infarct size and associated impairments...Individualized homeopathy may even play a helpful adjunctive role in treatment of sepsis. However, a great deal of systematic research effort lies ahead before most of the options discussed would meet mainstream medical standards for introduction into routine treatment regimens. ...experiments with a high methodological standard could demonstrate an effect of high potencies. No positive result was stable enough to be reproduced by all investigators. A general adoption of succussed controls, randomization and blinding would strengthen the evidence of future experiments. The evidence from rigorous clinical trials of any type of therapeutic or preventive intervention testing homeopathy for childhood and adolescence ailments is not convincing enough for recommendations in any condition. The [studies] were generally of low methodological quality...Homeopathic medicines, tested in HPTs, appear safe. The central question of whether homeopathic medicines in high dilutions can provoke effects in healthy volunteers has not yet been definitively answered, because of methodological weaknesses of the reports... The results suggest that, for several treatments, the risk-benefit profile is encouraging...For other therapies the evidence is weak or contradictory: homeopathy... Complex Homoeopathy...showed inconclusive results. effectiveness of homeopathy can be supported by clinical evidence and professional and adequate application be regarded as safe. {{cite journal |author=Pilkington K, Kirkwood G, Rampes H, Fisher P, Richardson J |title=Homeopathy f +213.140.6.98 You really should take another look. +This is not an issue of gossip or non-gossip. It is an issue of proper citation and sourcing, see WP:Source. If you are unfamiliar with the general rule then read this link. An edit with a verifiable citation should not be deleted by wiki rules and procedures. If you have an opposing citation you may add it to the edit according to wiki policy. 66.99.0.84 +" Substitution of one bias for another is not ""balance"", still less compliance with NPOV. Unfortunately, the bias tag must stick until an objective version comes along. " +The article looks good! +FUCK YOU ALL! GO TO HELL! +Tom, I'm a novice at this, and am just now figuring out how to use my Talk page. Yes, my view is that Lord Burghley did not take financial advantage of Oxford and other royal wards. In fact, a book of Lawrence Stone's (as I recall) demonstrates that Lord Burghley put the Earl of Rutland, a royal ward, on his feet again financially through his management of Rutland's affairs during Rutland's wardship (Lord Burghley was a good friend of Rutland's stepmother). The wardship system was a cash cow for the Tudor monarchy, and although Lord Burghley doubtless profited from his position as Master, he did not take financial advantage of his royal wards. In particular, since this article is about Oxford, Lord Burghley did not take financial advantage of Oxford during his wardship. The financial benefit of Oxford's wardship went to Leicester, as I've demonstrated from historical documents in my article in Brief Chronicles. Nina Green205.250.205.73 +the sounds, voices and videos +It could be the proof that Transnistria is not very democratic but not that it's not independent. +Yes, I was away & offline for virtually all of last week, and busy before that - I wasn't even aware of this article losing FA status until I saw discussion on it today. I'll take a look tonight - when I'm not dancing the night away....! All the best for 2008, +Use Of Thumbtacks In Professional Wrestling I read in the talk page for this page that you were against having this page on WP (which I agree with). There is now an AFD up for the article, if you are interesting in chipping in. +Yes, but the only problem is that minority representative is not 100% sure to enter the parilament -) See here: . +February 2011 (UTC) We don't have an undisputed source about Syria recognition. When we finish the debate about some of the sources the maps will be updated according to the result. 19:11, 17 +"...though alluded to its relation along a northwest-to-southeast axis within Europe, with the United Kingdom at the most advanced extreme and the Balkan countries at the least developed extreme - the more certain conditions were likely to occur during growth - consumption would be squeezed in favor of investment in countries starting from farther behind, there was likely to be a greater reliance on banks and other means of directing investment, among other conditions. Do ""certain conditions"" increase with being at the UK extreme, or the Balkan extreme? What are these ""certain conditions?"" What does it mean to say ""among other conditions?"" " +—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.5.242.136 . The consenus is clear. The policy on biographies is clear. The admins' position is clear; you've been blocked for this before. The time for discussion is over. It is vandalism, and you have been reported for it. +cheSTOP ADDING IN SHIT ONLY TO SUPPORT YOUR FUCKING POLITICAL VIEWS. YOUR ADDITIONS ONTO WIKIPEDIA ARE UNINTELLECTUAL, BIASED, AND ARE ONLY ADDED TO MISINFORM AND MANIPULATE PEOPLE INTO THINKING THAT EVERYTHING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DOES IS DERIVED FROMT HE MOUTH OF GOD. YOU FUCKING PIECE OF NIGGER SHIT. EITHER ADD CONSTRUCTIVE EDITS THAT USE REAL SOURCES OR STAY THE FUCK OFF OF WIKIPEDIA. WOULD YOU LIKE SOMEONE EDITING THE GEORGE BUSH PAGE WITH COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL MOORE OR KEITH OLBERMAN? NO YOU WOULDNT. SO SHOW SOME RESPECT AND KEEP YOUR POLITICAL SHIT OFF OF WIKIPEDIA. FUCK YOU, YOU UNITELLECTUAL PIECE OF GARBAGE SHIT. FUCK YOU NIGGER.ck +Guess you missed the part where I said not to leave me user messages. I'll reiterate for you as you seem a little slow. Fuck. Off. +" I don't feel that I can comment on your case yet. SarekOfVulcan (talk) " +Mortar shell is how I have seen it described. I can dig around for citations if necessary. It was fired from the hill opposite, not a great distance away. +PCT you are clearly a pov pushing author who synthesises information to suggest a scholarly consensus that does not exist(rather similar to a previous editor with similar agandas). As this page indicates you repeatedly try to force your agenda on pages. Genetic continuity has no logical or historical relationship to linguistic continuity, otherwise the Irish wouldn't speak English, nor the French speak French. It is reasonable to state that PCT proponents argue thsat this link is significant, and that opponents assert that it is not. It is not appropriate to add assertions from geneticists who are not promoting PCT as it this supports the theory. We have to write in accordance with WP:NPOV and avoid WP:OR (which includes WP:SYNTH). +User_talk:Blackson#Religious_bias +I just moved it again and will tag the old title for deletion. +" (1) Atheism is not a religion. (2) Wikipedia itself does not constitute an authoritative reference, per our well-established policies. (3) The article's section on religion comprises precisely one paragraph. It is unreasonable to claim that the content of that paragraph's final sentenceconcerning those who do not profess a religionis ""hidden"". " +Awesome work with permission request. +Thank you for experimenting with the page RoboCop on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +continued from User talk:Fbv65edel/Archive 10#Careful copying cited material +" Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Nas. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. is welcome to talk about his contributions. " +Ive asked Spino King, but why dont you join Wiki's dinosaur project? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dinoguy2&action;=edit§ion;=49 +You can see the reproduction in zoom from Britannica article. There is an original part of the 17th century work i.e. label saying N COPERNIC under the portrait. Scientifically it is a copy of 16th century self-portrait. Under this zoom is the adequate Britannica comment. My advice is if you want know more about this historical item you should contact directly the Museum of Jagielonian University.74.213.188.138 +" you are the one who has to stop making racial comments and treat other people like equal and stop implying that that European race is any better than the others. I am not European myself and I dont care which country is in or out. by the way that does not depend on you... wikipedia is the only place were yoursamll brain can express itself just like many other unknowlagable people in here. there is no need for someone to try to make someone ""LOOK"" like anything else than what they are . they probably would not even claim to be european if they knew that they would be somehow associated with a fascist like you. maybe all those people have to die their hair platinum blonde for you to like them !" +Heh Climate sceptics unmoved by scientist's about-face +Hi. I'm currently out of town on limited access (hence the alternate account), but I'll take a look at the situation when I get back and see what assistance I might be able to offer. ) +It's a good picture. It's going in the first slot. +Thanks for your help! But you're still a cunt! +":::In Mongolian ""khalkha"" means ""shield"". Also it used to mean ""cheek"" in ancient Mongolian. I think the etymology of the name Khalkha was extensively discussed in Гонгор's ""Халхын түүх"", if I'm remembering the name of the book correctly. Khalkha as a geographic entity was the centre of the Mongol possessions and therefore the safest place for the Mongols to live. (perhaps those in the southern domains were more exposed and vulnerable to the Ming invasions while those in the Western domains were vulnerable to the raids from Mogulistan and other Turkic states). " +You obviously never attended college, moron +Another source: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/uks-oldest-person-dies-aged-115-201430879.html 109.144.166.62 +Please wait, I'd like to dig deeper before conclusion. There is a page about L'âne rouge, which is french name of Klotski. It also mentions having Thai origin. That page is written around late 2003, so its content shouldn't be affected by wikipedia. +Warning. You're dealing with a liar, a jerk and an imposter. Warning. If you deal with Orangemarlin and his aliases, you're dealing with a liar, a jerk and an imposter. +" Image:Evil_sidewalk.gif listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Evil_sidewalk.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tex " +" A ""hint of longing?"", a ""HINT of longing?"" It's more like an avalanche of teenage angst because your crush won't reciprocate! a melancholic song about unrequited love, especially because it’s all crescendo and no denouement: Listeners never find out if the main character actually gets her wish—much less if the person she’s confessing her love to actually feels the same way. “All I Want For Christmas Is You” is a one-sided confession of wants and desires, not a song describing or celebrating a consummated relationship. “Honestly, the lyrics, to me, come off as hopelessly sad,” Williems says. “I’ve read the critical reception section of the song’s Wikipedia page, and I can’t help but think the critics weren’t really listening. One critic seems to claim there is a ‘hint of longing,’ which might be the understatement of the century. If you wanted to get real bummed about it, I think the argument could be made that the song is denouncing the artificiality surrounding the spectacle of Christmas,” he continues. “Saying that you are so hung up on the negative of not being with one person on Christmas that you can’t embrace the joy of the holiday is really pretty sad, but also movingly honest for a pop Christmas song. http://www.avclub.com/article/why-mariah-careys-christmas-hit-will-be-around-for-229110 Someone sort it out. Who is Williems? And why can't he/she spell ""Williams"" properly? " +"== ""Goofs"" Goof == Speaking of goofs, who the fuck had the, uh, initiative, to do this? What kind of sick person watches the Simpsons, and checks how many buttons they've got on their coats, or how often they shave, etc.? And especially, on that last comment... What is your problem?! You were measuring the breast size of a cartoon character?! Why can't you just buy a magazine, or something (or possibly consider how close the shot was to her), you poor, lonely bastard?!" +"{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" style=""text-align:center;"" |- | width=""48px"" | || This article was nominated for deletion on 31 May 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |} " +bumanate I never seen a meaning for someone who doesn't work at work. Why was this deleted? +" On his recent arrest This news item (published by Keyhān newspaper, in Persian on 7 March 2010) gives the reason for Mr Panahi's recent arrest. Briefly, according to Keyhān, Mr Panahi had been secretly producing a film at his home, a film that the newspaper calls ""anti-régime"" (alleyh-e nezām) and aimed at being released outside Iran. Keyhān says that there has not been any ""party"" going on at Mr Panahi's home at the time of arrests and the people arrested had not been ""guests"", but a number of people working on the film at issue. Keyhān cites the source of this news to Sobh-e Sǎdegh, and says ""according to a knowledgeable source"", but I have not looked into the latter publication. " +Manuel Caso & Kevin Zeredy +(e/c) Thanks for the offer Tom, I did revert the edit in question. I will note though, I'm not aware of how BRD could ever apply to a protected page, since admins are supposed to be leading, rather than reverting each other. The whole idea of page protection is to get the discussion and agreement before the edits. (after e/c) I'm not involved with Wikinews and they are responsible for their own internal discipline. I mostly worry about this project, though I'm wondering about the meta-issues just now - but hopefully that will go away soon. +I love you with mouth +Template:Did you know nominations/Güstrow Castle Rosiestep, I was surprised to see that the Güstrow Castle article was withdrawn from article space on October 31, and disappointed that you did not answer my query on the nomination template about this highly unusual step. I'm dubious about keeping the nomination open under these circumstances. +" I'm the one who added it, maybe I didn' explain it very well. It's not just a change of graphic options (as in, a simple video resolution change). The game contains two compressed files, each of which contains distinct textures and models (which are the ""low-res assets"" and the ""high-res assets""). IMHO, the notable part is how only the pixel shader 3.0-compatible video card can use the high resolution textures and more detailed model; conversely, the less performing video cards cannot use the high-res assets (=it's impossible) and the high-res assets file can even be deleted without any repercussion on the game." +Dog -n- Suds article I'm sorry for coming off as such an asshole on the edit to dog n suds. I was pissed off that day because I got 3 people threatening to ban me over retarded shit, I was mostly just being a smartass and was expecting it get reverted back and threatened with yet another banning. I can't seem to do shit right here. aw well fuck em. Just wanted to say sorry ( ) +POSIX next steps I added the missing headers, I think it would be easier to note the differences in the C Standard Library than to make new articles Sadly the document?/Website is not very user-friendly (to make it sound nice) Why is it important to note the Issues? Order things from old to new would make more sense (with maybe short explanations) What do you think? +Extol is the coolest band +{{unblock reviewed|1= The unrelated person has been reading my discussions and messed with my account I know who did it and they have a apologised and they did not know I would be blocked , why would I attack someone page that will be just stupid I know how to conduct my self in wikipedia and I know what happens to if you attack , damage on wikpedia. please can you unblock me and I will assure you that I will look after my account safer in the future. +Call of Duty Wiki and Infinity Ward I've noticed you that Infinity Ward needs an update. The 3 Vandal groups must be eliminated and they do not exist on your wiki. Revert their edits that harass you. Thank you. +Regarding to lectionaries list: because it is inappropriate to have multiple articles on the same topic, I have boldly redirected List of Lectionary Manuscripts to List of New Testament lectionaries, and attempted to merge any content. As for the Munster link, I have changed it so it links directly to the page on lectionaries. Reworking the intro may be a good idea, and I may do it myself if I get a little more free time. - [talk] +" Do you see any value to consistency of treatment across similar articles in Wikipedia? If so, what do you perceive to be the standard approach for ""History of Country X"" articles? " +... and asks for consideration. +"::::Frey wasn't exactly the definition of tactful... Essjay would do a much better job. talk " +This title is meaningless. It would be better at Differences between Brazilian and European Portuguese dialects. 03:24, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC) +NIGHTSTALLION IS A CUNT +I had to take a time-out, but I'm back and watching. And say, if you have a chance to see it, it's a pretty clever and funny movie! +Image licensing Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:DresdenSemperOper2.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use{{gfdl}}if you release it under the GFDL, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. If you uploaded other images, please clarify copyright for them as well, otherwise the images will eventually be deleted. Thanks, ☯ 01:39, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC) +Amazing! Why would you ignore my invitations (even one on your talk page) long before all these negative (yes i admit i wasn't always acting perfect)? Have you simply been waiting to the issue being escalated to the current degree and/or waiting for me to prompted again and again till I act in the degree for which you blocked and just in order to be able to block me? Isn't all you have done so far, just keep reverting whatever changes I made? +IFA Premiership The league is currently known as the IFA Premiership, so Category:Irish Football League players ought to be retitled Category:IFA Premiership players to reflect this. +Alternate option== Is there perhaps enough newsworthy information to make an article about the Bundy family as a whole, that the various family members can be redirected to? Or does that violate a guideline I'm not aware of? == +" As WP:CONSENSUS says, In determining consensus, consider the quality of the arguments, the history of how they came about, the objections of those who disagree, and existing policies and guidelines. The quality of an argument is more important than whether it represents a minority or a majority view. The arguments ""I just don't like it"" and ""I just like it"" usually carry no weight whatsoever. I'd really appreciate it if you'd join the discussion I'm having with BGwhite, above, about specific formatting issues. " +" Indeed, but Odd nature did not write ""you appear to tie editors up"" etc., he wrote ""you like to tie editors up"" etc. both an accusation and an attack, not just ""his view,"" especially considering its lack of veracity. Thank you." +LOL You don't know who I fucking am, we all know who +" Ojai Valley I removed the following: No documentation, including the remaining landscape still shot, reputed to be from an outlook on Highway 150, supports the contention that the Ojai Valley was used as a location in the film. because there was no documentation to support the contention of no documentation. I replaced it with info from the bonus feature on the ""Lost Horizon"" dvd. I couldn't find it transcribed anywhere online to post it as a reference, however. " +" This also applies to bands you may be involved with. Bands must meet notability guidelines as outlined here: WP:BAND. Also, a member of the band is named Ben Curwin, which is very similar to your username. The person who uploaded the file to the music archive was also named Ben Curwin. It is inappropriate to create articles about yourself or your band, or the company for which you work. The links above are provided for your reference. Best regards. (Talk) (Stuff) " +Wrong! Anacondas have never been found over 30 feet long Ilovedirtbikes +I did not edit anything that was at contention. I have asked +|importance=high}} {{Former TAFI|date=May 20, 2013 +I have now reported your fourth revert on WP:AN/3RR. If you want to avoid a block, you could reinsert the paragraph again. | Talk +Alien gel pokemon i hear that rotom is classified as the alien gel pokemon. anyone know what said classification means? +" ISO 639-3 This article handles the same with ISO 639-3 ""Old Japanese""? Since there is no example on the website, I am not sure. " +" After Arkansas Preservation redesigned their web site a few weeks ago, there are a number of issues with the NRHP part of the site. I have found at least two instances of listings that are missing from search results, and numerous PDFs of listings are also missing. If you find what seem to be missing entries, you can try to find them the NRIS mirror run by Elkman, which has all listings up to about April 2010 (i.e. it has no listings or delistings after then). If they show up in Elkman but not on the Arkansas Preservation site, contact them (info@arkansaspreservation.com), they're pretty good about responding. On the old web site, I would report errors or omissions that would be fixed within a business day. Sometimes the omission from their site is caused by an imminent delisting. For bridges, you can also see if Bridgehunter has images or other information (like better lat/lon, which these two listings need). In this case, listings for ""Cove Creek Bridge"" and ""Cove Creek Tributary Bridge"" both show up in Elkman (Tributary=95000644, Creek=95000645), and are given separate resource identifiers (in the ""Other Names"" field in Elkman: Tributary=LO0051, Creek=LO0050). Unfortunately, Logan County appears to be one of the counties whose nomination forms are not currently available on the web site, but they can send copies by email. Bridgehunter has images of both bridges (look nearly identical), provided by the Arkansas Highway Dept. ''''♪piano " +" This block is even more outrageous and illegitimate than the first. You didn't even allow me to say anything; that alone makes this charade illegitimate and unacceptable. The whole essence of Dougweller's argument over the last few weeks has been that article talk pages can and should be viewed in isolation when addressing a dispute. Bbb23 and JamesBWatson agreed with him in this regard and that was the main basis for punishing me for the recent conflict that was started by Mzilikazi1939. Therefore my actions of yesterday constitute complete compliance with the rules and the comments from these two administrators. As was made crystal clear on Talk:Aesop yesterday, Mzilikazi and his friends never complied with the rules set out in WP:ERA in their latest attempt to change the article Aesop. I already tried merely correcting their illegal actions and explaining it in edit summaries and personal talk pages but they continued ramming through their illegal changes, so yesterday, even though corrections of rule breaches should not require discussion, I made the peace-making effort of explaining the matter on the talk page Talk:Aesop. I went above and beyond what was required in order to see a peaceful resolution to Mzilikazi's edit war and I fully complied with both the Wikipedia rules and the wishes of the two administrators who had judged on the issue. If I broke the rules by obeying those administrators then the first block was obviously not valid and therefore an indefinite block now is not allowed. In fact, any punishment now would not be allowed because the alleged rule breach was entirely due to the directions given by Bbb23 and JamesBWatson, i.e. that article talk pages, as asserted by Dougweller, are meant to be viewed in isolation from other talk pages. My peace-making efforts yesterday were most certainly not a ""diatribe""; it was a clearly and thoughtfully written explanation of what the issue was, how Mzilikazi's actions breached the rules and even how to resolve the matter. Unlike what we've seen from Mzilikazi and Dougweller consistently, I included no personal attacks in my efforts of yesterday. Bb23 made the dubious accusation that I had used personal attacks in recent weeks but I reject that entirely; I never called anyone names and I never tried to rely on ad hominem arguments to ""justify"" my position, unlike what we've seen from Mzilikazi in particular. Yesterday's edit was completely free from personal attacks; that's undisputable. The very fact that Bbb23 would describe yesterday's tactful, eloquent, peace-making effort as ""diatribe"", an extremely strong word, is more than enough proof that he has strong feelings about the issue and, as per WP:INVOLVED is therefore ineligible to participate in an administrative capacity here. This is a breach of the same policy that User:EncycloPetey broke when he banned me years ago, causing him to be stripped of his administrator status. I was already wondering how Bbb23 could block me the first time with that non-sensical, contradictory excuse for an explanation. If article talk pages aren't meant to be viewed in isolation then both Aesop's Fables and Aesop are meant to be using the standard English style of dates. That is what I originally insisted but for that I was blocked by Bbb23. However, if, as asserted by Dougweller and agreed to in the rulings of Bbb23 and JamesBWatson, article talk pages are meant to be viewed in isolation then Aesop's Fables is a lost cause and Mzilikazi has got away with his change there but Aesop is still meant to remain in the BC/AD state. Yesterday's edit is in complete compliance with that ruling and I even made the additional effort of explaining it on the talk page to ensure that I could not be successfully accused of making trouble. For anyone who reads what I wrote at Talk:Aesop yesterday, there can be no doubt that not only did I comply with the rules yesterday, but I even went out of my way to work towards ending Mzilikazi's conflict peacefully and in accordance with the proper procedures.( )" +Is hacked accounts actually in the unblock criteria, I couldn't find it but I've heard you can just check the IP, can this be done? +" This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page. You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, move (without knowing exactly what you are doing), or remove this notice from the page while the discussion is in progress. For more information, read the Guide to Deletion. ''Maintenance use only: {{subst:md2|pg=|text=}} {{subst:md3|pg=}} [ log] Category:Miscellaneous pages for deletion " +" Yeah, I didn't get far in the game. It was fun to play, but I think either it froze up on me during play, or the Playstation did...I can't remember the reason I stopped playing it. I love Short Circuit 2; the first was good, but for some reason the second had more charm...even if it was a poorer made movie. I was never big into Disney. I think my favorite as a child were The Lion King and Rescurers Down Under-maybe even The Great Mouse Detective. Too much singing for my tastes. I'll take Nightmare/Christmas over The Little Mermaid. Speaking of which, Nightmare/Christmas was just released in 3-D. Toy Story was awesome...lol, I was just reciting some dialogue to the first one two nights ago. I was thinking about buying them. I don't remember seeing the second film all the way through. (Contact me) " +Hi , your edits appears to have been caught up in a block of edits flagged by the Special:PendingChanges review list. Sorry about that, it happens. You can apply to be a WP:Reviewer and then you can approve or revert these kinds of edits before you make yours which would prevent this situation in the future. Regards, (Talk) ☮ღ☺ +I'm not talking about just any map from the MTA, but THE official system map. The MTA prints lots of maps that include subway information but not the SIR, however none of these maps are the official map. Just because a map comes from the MTA does not make it the official map. All of the official system maps from the MTA have included the SIR since 1998. (talk • contribs) +No, I'm just going to use the new Grump-approved version of the reference. +Yakushima WP:NOTSCADAL Controversy and Televised Comments. +WOW! Talk about suppression and suppression of dissent. +You might want to consider prodding Lara out of retirement for this one. Dweller is quite good with this kind of list, too. 63.164.47.227 +" Note to reviewing administrator: These are the edits that resulted in the above block: , , , , and, . talk " +" Argentine football Hi there, I noticed that you created an article on Andrés Yllana, I have made a few additions to the article including adding the Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentine football parameter on the talk page. Maybe you would be interested in joining the project? If you do make any more Argentine football related pages could you announce them here Wikipedia:Wikiproject Argentine football/New articles, cheers. Keep up the good work, kind regards, (T/C) " +the URL not linked is triggering the blacklist. I'm off to check that out. +", 6 April 2007 (UTC) The countries were illegally annexed, and there is a considerable difference between de facto and de jure; if I steal your car and then forge the title, it may be ""my car"" in that I drive it, register it, paint it hot pink and invite my relatives to live in it, but a Wikipedia article on the matter would probably best be entitled ""Theft of Dojarco's car."" The article on O.J. Simpson's murder case at Wikipedia is entitled O. J. Simpson murder case. Calculating numbers of countries is tangential to the legal aspect, as explained above basically, most free countries that had relations renewed relations, never having recognized the legality of the forcible annexation. Many countries did not have relations prior to the occupation, because many were not sovereign back then (e.g., India was part of the British Empire, etc. a list is available here ). I have nothing against including information on who did and who didn't recognize the annexation within the article, and the article should include information on the ""lameness"" of continuity, too. But if you would emerge from the innards of this debate a bit a person interested in the occupation (or even the argument that there was no occupation) would generally expect an article like this, with a title like this. It's a frequent search term. One includes denial in the Holocaust entry, and there are separate entries on Holocaust denial and even Criticism of Holocaust denial but this does not mean that we agree with Holocaust denial, does it? The occupation of the Baltic States is not universally agreed upon, no but not too many things are universally agreed upon. Presenting the prevailing view and serious alternate views is what an encyclopedia is supposed to do. You write: Saying Baltics were not annexed is pure nonsence and extremist POV. Nobody here said that the Baltics weren't annexed what some here are saying is that they were illegally annexed whilst under occupation, and that is indeed the prevailing view. Please follow the links I gave. That some are in denial really does not matter. Start an article on ""Denial of the occupation of the Baltic States"" if you like. 09:05" +" Whether a particular document is a ""reliable"" source depends on how that document is used in the article. The Chinese paper could be used as a reliable source that a particular person reported a certain result, but it shouldn't if it reports something dramatic like that the whole field changed because of that result. This is why I keep asking people to focus on EDITS first rather than sources. " +History of the winners is very important..as it basically shows as to who was crowned and it is a very important element of the pageant. Its like we are talking about a country's political history with no mention of the president or prime ministers appointed... So think about it.. and add it if u think its imp. A very good list was made previous when the article got deleted... ( ). +Plot The plot section seems overly lengthy. Should it be cut down or split into sections. Does anyone have any feelings? +Suspected sockpuppet of User:Stho002 Report filed here +Dutch flag The French flag was not inspired by the flag of the Netherlands. This theory put forward by an anonymous user repeatedly in the last days is simply not supported by any proof and seems to be only a (chauvinistic?) guess from that anonymous user. Actually, ironically, I found out that it seems the Netherlands designed their flag in the 17th century based on the blue-white-red colors of the Bourbon of France. According to the French Wikipedia it is King Henry IV of France who suggested these colors to the newly independent Netherlands. Finally, the Netherlands did not have borders with France at the time of the Revolution as the anonymous user wrote. France had borders with the Austrian Low Countries, but not with the independent Netherlands. 30 June 2005 11:06 (UTC) The original colours of the Dutch flag were orange, white and blue. King Henry V of France did not suggest to the Netherlands to use red, white and blue. The Dutch started using red because the orange colour was unstable in flag making. This is not chauvinism. Here are some sources: http://www.minbuza.nl/default.asp?CMS_ITEM=MBZ460652 http://www.heraldica.org/topics/france/frflag.htm#tricolor http://www.languedoc-france.info/06141201_tricolore.htm 11 August 2005 16:19 (UTC) +Islam (;There are ten pronunciations of Islam in English, differing in whether the first or second syllable has the stress, whether the s is or , and whether the a is pronounced , or (when the stress is on the first syllable) (Merriam Webster). The most common are (Oxford English Dictionary, Random House) and (American Heritage Dictionary).   Arabic pronunciation varies regionally. The first vowel ranges from ~~. The second vowel ranges from ~~~. At some geographic regions, such as Northwestern Africa they don't have stress.) is the monotheistic religion articulated by the Qur'an, a text considered by its adherents to be the verbatim word of God ( ), and by the teachings and normative example (called the Sunnah and composed of Hadith) of Muhammad, considered by them to be the last prophet of God. An adherent of Islam is called a Muslim. +" Barnstar Thank you for you kind words, and the barnstar. Much appreciated. (talk) " +epic fail HA HA HA HA FAILED AGAIN!!!!!!!! Goodye bitches.68.79.123.131 PS: FUCK YOU!! +":I just noticed your edit summary mentioning me I had nothing to do with that. I did check the history and the diff does seem odd: it ""looks"" like your comment disappears in the course of a long reply of mine to multiple comments, including yours. And something odd happened yesterday as well: it looks as though both the tail end of my comment and one of yours were deleted by an anonymous IP and then mine put back (Raymond arritt then put yours back). While I frankly consider your comments and suggestions not exactly to be in the best interest of improving the article, I find this odd deletion stuff more problematic in the context of other things going on. Might I suggest that whoever's been doing this, stop? -BC aka " +Same about Last Christmas for Ashley Tisdale. +Tony, being an admin is not a license to be an arse. Grow up and leave the userboxes alone. +my god why are you doing this to me what did i do ^︵^☄ +" I can see how dark pink/red and midway between yellow & orange and orange would be difficult on the tracking map. Tito's colors seem good for the map, though they're mostly in the hot side of the spectrum. I wouldn't (and didn't) mind green for TD myself, though some equate green with good. MeekSaffron (Jaffa,Tree!) " +No, I'd guess you aren't have many African Americans in Europe. But now that one has become the President of the United States, perhaps the term will become more familiar to you. Or not. In the meantime, you can read the brief answer to Q2 in the FAQ box at the top of this page. For further reading, you could Google the term. +" Removed off-topic remarks I have reverted the non-article or WP:BLP violation comments on the talk-page, from IP 82.21.28.50 (in Lewisham, United Kingdom). We cannot leave BLP violations on a talk-page (such as ""he's a sociopath"" or ""everyone knows the father of XXX was planning to kill the 4 guys downstairs""). Please remind others to focus on changes to the article, rather than rant about who is guilty or not. If more non-article or insulting remarks are added, please feel free to revert them, and perhaps add a note in this section. -Wikid77 " +"what is that?? ""The Van Resistance was a defensive resistance by the Armenian population in the city of Van against the Ottoman Empire's attempt to liquidate them during the Armenian Genocide of World War I."" that is totaly wrong and misleading and POV and/or what ever avaliable. liquidation and During when during?! the depprotation law was issued months later. besides the first idea about deportation was provided to Turkish goverment by govermor of Van after the van rebelion. this is well documented. there is no stop with these guys. and that ""and in small towns began a local uprising with pitchforks, wrenches, pipes, and other makeshift weapons"" the damn town was a russian arsenal and every one knows that!oh God give me patience. same for you too... " +"In the 1943 Allied leaders' Tehran conference, Josef Stalin referred to the Finnish over-all war efforts as a ""defensive"" campaign. In Moscow, in 1948, Stalin reminded about his respect for the Finnish defense: ""Nobody respects a country with a bad army. Everybody respects a country with a good army. I raise my toast to the Finnish army."" - Josef Stalin " +" Felisa Rincon de Gautier No problem, definitely will respect how you had it. Just remember ""Gautier"" was her husbands name, I mean she was only a Gautier by marriage." +" I have looked at the links you provide above and do not see any personal attacks. I see me explaining my actions to you or other editors and stating my opinions about your edit methods. Thanks also for deleting your user talk:Travb/m page or having had it deleted by an admin. I am not sure which as there is no edit history any longer. If an admin deleted it then I am grateful to them for seeing what is going on here. I notice that all your personal attacks on me are slowly being deleted by you from all over wiki where you wrote them. Thanks for that too. Talk " +I did the Matura in Austria and never heard anyone call it Reifeprüfung so I changed it. 80.110.75.104 The word Matura is also used elsewhere, but in the same meaning I guess. +Vandalism on Cheap Trick Putting back an album that's not released yet, and deleting the big HTML comment with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball that was clearly warning against it, is considered vandalism. (diff) +" Kurds are not Iranian Kurdish people are not ""Iranians."" Just because there is a possiblity that the Medians were ancestors of the Kurds does not in any way make the Kurds ""Iranian."" Just because Kurdish is a bit similar to languages like Persian, does not make Kurds ""Iranian."" Kurdish people are descendants of many different people that inhabitated Kurdistan such as Hurrians, Gutians, Mittani, Cordune, and much more. Kurds are not ""Iranian people."" I have many many reliable scholarly sources on the Kurds, and it does not mention anything about being ""Iranian."" Kurds have their own histroy, and are a distinct people. The term Iranian, in itself is wrong to describe. Today, the term is used to describe a person who lives or is from Iran. Therefore, many people will be heavily confused when they see this term. Not only that, but like I said, Kurds are not Iranian in the first place. I have many sources to back it up and I don't know why Wikipedia allowed such false information to be posted up. I am not denying that the Kurdish lanugage can be described as a lanugage that is part of the Indo -European family of Northwestern Iraninan languages, but to say that the Kurds themselves are Iranian is completley false. Kurds have a long history in the Middle East and were even mentioned by the Sumerians. Kurds are descendants of many different people and there is not only historical evidence to back that up, but genetic evidence as well. Dont think so? Then go search for yourself." +Tartaglia's formula In Tetrahedron#Volume it is stated that Tartaglia's formula is is essentially due to the painter Piero della Francesca in the 15th century. If this is the case, it should be also stated in the Niccolò Fontana Tartaglia article. +"""Thor in comics"" anyone? ""Thor (comics disambiguated)""? ""Thor (various comics)"". Instead of all this ""I want the title!"" stuff—which, you've gotta admit, could come off as pretty immature—just make up a title and get the ball rolling. The more time you waste debating how to do every little thing and what title(s) to use, the less serious and well intentioned you look (to me). This is to be fair and help inform, right? It's not meant to put out people who intentionally linked to marvel's thor when wikifying—99.9, I'd wager—or done out of spite or something, yes? Then for goodness sake, JUST DO IT! and worry about naming later. Both ""Thor (marvel comics)"" and ""Thor (comics)"" are this page. Accept that, make the new page and let's try to work things out from there. " +" Speedy deletion of Mino Ryū A tag has been placed on Mino Ryū requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TALK " +Just letting you know, I have started creating a series of categories Category:Deaths at age x, which can be found in Category:Deaths by age. These categories are far from complete and are still being built. Along with the category, I started a policy page titled Wikipedia:Death by age. You may be interested in giving your input on the new categories at Wikipedia talk:Death by age. +" McMartin was one of several cases in the 80's involved in this debate. The best NPOV book on McMartin is Hechler, D. (1988). The Battle and the Backlash: The Child Sexual Abuse War. Lexington,Massachusetts: Lexington Books. This book covers both sides of the issue extremely well with interviews from the actual participants. Hechler's work has appeared in the NY Tinmes, the Village Voice and the New York Daily News. Earl is biased and so is Underwager's IPT. In regard to Prometheus Books, it has been stated on another wiki talk page: ""Prometheus books is not a credible source on child sexual abuse. Their ""Human Sexuality"" section throughout the 80s and 90s was edited by Vern Bullough, who is also a board member of Paidika, the Dutch pro-paedophile magazine. Under Bullough's editorship, Prometheus published a range of pro-paedopihlia titles, including the Eberles, as well as the book ""Children's sexual encounters with adults"" in which a number of contributors espoused pro-paedophile views. I am astonished at the inconsistency with which certain Wikipeida editors attribute credibility to different sources on child sexual abuse. The Eberles' history with child pornography is in the public domain and it has been for almost twenty years. Now we find editors claiming that the Eberles (and John Earle, a contributor their book) are considered credible sources, whilst all sources (including major newspapers, magazines and a trial judge) indicating that they are child pornographers are not credible sources."" Another really good book on the Day Care Cases is Though this book is out of print, it should be available on Amazon.com. " +"OlYeller wrote: ""Your argument that there's a second event simply isn't true."" That's for a consensus to determine, not for you to determine unilaterally. Also, in a revision comment, Olyeller wrote: ""No indication that this is an annual event."" This is blatantly false. The Norris poster that started this entire event clearly states it's annual. In adddition, there are at least three Facebook pages dedicated to the second ANNUAL event. Those are INDICATIONS. Multiple indications. Therefore, stating that there are ZERO indications is false. If you continue to make such false claims, I will be forced to report you. Btw, it's amusing how Olyeller claimed that he was ""checking out"" (i.e., refusing to respond to MrBosnia again). And yet, lo and behold, he responded yet again. -) MrBosnia, you are absolutely correct. Keep up the good work. " +" DYK for Rescue of Jews by Polish communities during the Holocaust On 11 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article Rescue of Jews by Polish communities during the Holocaust, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. " +NPwatcher Thank you for taking the time to review my application. However, Martinp23 (creater of NPwatcher) has already decided to give me access to the tool. So your input is not necessary. Cheers! (talk) +" Don't worry about the above too much - but copyrighted files like this can't be used when it's ""easy"" to get free shots. That's why so many articles on living people don't have an image, they're waiting for free images to appear. You also need to find some more sources about Kelly - IMDb isn't classed as a very reliable source because like wikipedia most of it is user generated content, so it isn't verifiably correct. " +please reffer tkz.jpg +Ugh, that's a fairly lengthy article (especially for translating the whole). Couldn't you just specify some particular sections which you'd need translating? Perhaps I could help you with than. +"As you continue to ignore processes in place, I have had to start another ANI thread here. (talk) " +I have also cut that article. There is no need for specific statistics or descriptions. +" The Admin's Barnstar Awarded for closing difficult DRVs!— T/C " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Oh, and thanks for deleting your test edit to Second Avenue Subway =). - (talk) .:. +I THINK NAWLINWIKI’S A HOMUNCULUS. +Oh I know why you're upset, but Wikipedia is not censored, so it should not matter whether I speak of ejecualtion or not. And no more threats about blocks, please. When you've only done what you feel will benefit an article, threats of being condemned simply for supporting Freedom of Speech get tiresome. Good day. +" Please do not delete relevant contributions and censor criticisms placed in the proper ""Criticisms"" sections of articles. Doing so undermines the integrity of Wikipedia and makes you look stupid." +I agree, there's a lot of interpretation going on here. An ordinary viewer watching the movie would be hard pressed to come to any of these conclusions about the fight between Neo and Agent Smith. 71.202.181.84 +Piss off you old timer - go fuck yourself you evil asshole. +Yellowcard and Ryan Key Please stop incorrectly editing Ryan Key and Yellowcard. I don't know where you get your information, but none of it is correct. Ryan Key is not an original member of Yellowcard. You have no sources to back this up because it isn't true. Thank you. +will avoid getting into those situations +Thanks Sorry about the unnecessary extra reversion at the siege articleI was working from a list of editor contributions, and failed to realize that there was a substantial time gap between the previous edits and the newer ones. (I only noticed it now because I was going through my own contributions list and suddenly saw a big negative number attached to one of my edits.) Thank you for fixing my mistake. よ! +NNYDL Please do not remove are stats from the EVHS page. Those were taken this year by us. Thank You 8:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC) +GAN backlog contest Hi mate, I'm not sure if you know about this or if you'll have the time, but over the month of October the project is running a GAN review contest. It can be found here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Contest/GAN backlog elimination/October 2010 in case you are interested. Cheers. +I see from your argument that you are claiming that these two sources have not accurately defined the Greek word κιβωτὸς—yet according to my own copy of Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Fully Updated and Unabridged, published by World, copyright 1890 by James Strong, Greek Lexicon, Forty-fifth printing 1989, page 55, number 2787, their definitions are entirely accurate and reliable and completely agree. I challenge you to present here your evidence that all three are wrong, citing authoritative linguistic sources, and peer-reviews denouncing them as false and erroneous. The three sources cited here even agree with Brown-Driver-Briggs English-Hebrew Lexicon on Hebrew definitions. It too has a reputation of reliable scholarship. I do not believe you can prove that it too is in error. Your argument has no intelligence. You lose +Heliocentrism, Geocentrism, etc... The whole section on the various models of the Solar System proposed throughout history seems to me a bit tangential and too detailed for this article. After all, the Heliocentrism and Geocentrism articles exist for this very reason. Going into the details of who came up with what is a little much, and no effort is made to connect the various models to the observation of Mars itself. It might thus be a good idea to prune the section down to essentials, and relate to Mars specifically. +" It'll more than do. With the extra info the merger proposal is closed. " +"== Northwest Rail Line == Before you reinsert the material that claims the Northwest Rail Line has been cancelled, please find a source that specifically mentions its demise, not just that it isn't a near-term possibility for the agency compared with the rapid bus line. Thanks, (talk) " +" Prior accounts Have you ever used a prior account on Wikipedia? nableezy - " +good morning wikipedia fuckhead +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Red Army (football). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Hardcore Punk hey thanks for the removal of sourced material . it was fun to put it back and will be fun to continue putting it back . hope all is well . 68.39.152.45 +If you block me, I will just get another IP address. Ass. +" The version that you keep reverting to is at least as anti-contra as the other version is ""pro-contra."" The irony is that while the Sandinistas themselves have been willing to admit their errors and have reached out to win the votes of former rebels and their sympathizers, some of their foreign supporters seem to be stuck in their circa 1986 vision of Nicaragua. Some Wikipedia editors are holding to views about the contras that even the Sandinistas don't believe anymore. For instance, while pro-contra editors like to emphasize the role of the MILPAS, anti-contra editors prefer to emphasize the role of former Guardsmen. Yet even Envio, in its February 1987 review of the contra war, noted that Dimas' MILPAS rebellion was ""the most serious episode"" of the early part of the war. On the other hand, your favored version reads that ""many members"" of the old Guard were involved in forming early groups like the 15th of September Legion. But even writers who were hardly pro-contra, like Christopher Dickey and Roy Gutman, have noted how tiny these groups were. I've been reluctant to touch this article, fearing that I would just be getting involved in a quagmire. However, I don't think I can remain on the sidelines anymore. T | C " +Omg, I was way off. You are Osborne, I didn't realise this wasn't your talk page. Well, go to Help:Merging and moving pages and follow the instructions there. — aldebaer⁠ +Clean up The principle behind this is correct and it is definitely not the same as Mediterranean Sea, which is a geography article primarily about the sea itself. There is a distinct socio-economic context here that is as valid as Northern Europe or Sub-Saharan Africa. Unfortunately the article needs a rather heavy rewrite to get it off its soap-box and make it NPOV. But then, lots of Wiki articles started that way. 7 July 2005 14:32 (UTC) +Oversighted diffs on User:Ash Hi AGK, I believe your oversights to User:Ash exceed the scope of Wikipedia's oversight policy. I append webcites of the deleted revisions so that others can judge for themselves.67.168.135.107 +It may be that there have been students who are vandalizing, but i dont feel that i should pay for what other not-too-bright students have done. Please remove the block. +" I found out that the whoule company changed. With a little research you will find out that vnunet.be changed is names to V3.co.uk > but the magazine is discontinued, I think. The old articles archived by archive.org; but as the mozillazine commentary says: this was only published physically. So, however: we need these papers or we couldn't integrate it ;( mabdul " +Scholarly studies by historians In recent years historians have published numerous scholarly studies of Freemasonry esp in the 18th century, with sepecial emphasis on the importance of the movement in European and American history. I added a summary of the work and a bibliography. I included a full range of differing viewpoints. +Sacco and Vanzetti Thanks for explaining your edit this time. The first time you made the edit you did so without explanation. That's why someone undid your edit. BTW, it does not matter at all whether the Italian is good Italian or not. It's a quote. All that matters is exactly what he said. +Also, the article on hull number 1000 Zumwalt puts it's cost at 3.3bn. +Well thank you, always happy to talk to fans! I don't have a Wikipedia page 'cuz my band's not notable enough, but I'll sign an autograph as soon as possible! However, I don't believe I sing like Deryck Whiblily, but I guess it's all just a matter of personal opinion, right? +clue what i think about? How can you not understand even +Thanks Good work on Nynorsk, thank you. +" xenocide against me I am the foremost expert in the world on Ho-Chunk mythology, at least outside this N. American Indian tribe. There was a stub on this subject that had a short re-written excerpt from my website, so it occurred to me that since there was essentially nothing there, I could perform a service by writing an overview of Ho-Chunk mythology. I had spent three days carefully writing the first three sections of this with an enormous number of footnotes, when some hobbledehoy put in a section extolling the garbage-like ideas of my bitterest academic enemies. Fortunately, only a very small fraction of what I was going to write was entered. I assumed that if this outsider wanted to intrude in the middle of my project, that it would be alright to remove my part of the contribution and give him free rein to do whatever it was that he wanted in pursuing his competing thesis. It makes no sense to me to have a highly scholarly article riddled with severe inconsistencies. That I can't remove my very own contribution is infuriating. However, the good news is that my lawyer thinks that I have a good position on this. I took material out of my copy writted website with the thought that at some point I could say, ""reproduced by permission of the author"". However, I hadn't yet gotten around to that when my article was destroyed by an ignoramus intruder. That means that almost all of it violates my own copy-write. Therefore, under the present circumstances, I not only may withdraw it, but I must withdraw it according to your own rules. I resisted these attempts to force me to surrender my writing to the encyclopedia by every means that I could think of. Except one, of course: a lawsuit for copy-write infringement. I'll make you a deal. I'll accept banishment gladly if you will return to me my own writing out of this STUB (!). Please contact me by my own email, as this site is pure chaos to me, and I don't think that I will be able to find your response otherwise. diete003@umn.edu" +" In describing the ability of reporters to get passes to White House press conferences, Coulter speculated that they must be easy to acquire since the ""White House allows that old Arab Helen Thomas to sit within yards of the president."" Helen Thomas is a White House reporter of Syrian ancestry.[23] There's a problem with this ^, Syrians ARE arabic. Remove the quote, it's not contradictive." +" Bitola/Matrix, you are such a hypocrite.   /FunkyFly.talk_  " +". Please see this and thisas examples of top level articles in addition to two I provided above.I don't see why a short mention of the Copts' persecution would be undue weight, or different from the sentences in the above two sample articles. Something like ""Christian Copts face discrimination and marginalization, and violent anti-Christian attacks in Upper Egypt during the 1990s forced thousands of Copts to flee"" - quite similar to what we have in teh SA article "" Religious freedom is virtually non-existent in Saudi Arabia. The Government does not provide legal recognition or protection for freedom of religion, and it is severely restricted in practice. "" or the Iran article ""the Bahá'í Faith, Iran's largest religious minority,[193] is not officially recognized, and has been persecuted during its existence in Iran. Since the 1979 revolution the persecution of Bahá'ís has increased with executions, the denial of civil rights and liberties, and the denial of access to higher education and employment."" I believe the massacres articles should linked to from Egypt too" +I think it belongs here, its place is in the KKK article, not one on its regalia. +I'd like to ask again, since the edit-block filter codes/coding is invisible (at least to me) and so its origin/purpose/acceptance onto Wikipedia is unclear: Who created the edit-block filter, and under whose aegis/guidance/discussion? Could you please point me to the discussion regarding its creation / purpose / documentation / etc.? Thank you. +" It happened so long ago and the situation was SO complex that I think no one really remembers completely correctly what happened. As far as I remember, it went something like this: the owner of Chernomorets Burgas bought Conegliano German (a team from a village next to Sofia) and for various reasons (mainly to get the Burgas team into a higher division without going through the proper means of actually gaining promotion - which is the same as what happened when Akademik Sofia swapped divisions with Vihar Gorublyane, actually, as well as a bunch of other teams such as Pirin Blagoevgrad) merged the two teams, which ended up being called ""Chernomorets Burgas (Burgas)"" in Group B and ""Chernomorets Burgas (Sofia)"" in Group A. Then a whole bunch of other stuff happened at the same time such as Burgas municipality founding their OWN team (which they called ""Chernomorets (Burgas)"" - note the punctuation in all three cases); then a bunch of business deals went down whereby Neftohimik Burgas (which had since been renamed ""Naftex"") got merged with Pomorie, then that team got merged with one of the Chernomorets'es, then the other Chernomorets remained as the ""official"" Chernomorets, but still there was some dispute over players/grounds/finances...then that eventually merged with the first chernomorets; then the Sofia Chernomorets went back to being Conegliano German, then the Neftohimik fans formed a fans' club Neftohimik which began at the lowest level and... in short - before 2000 there was a Neftohimik and a Chernomorets in Burgas, and after 2010 there is a Neftohimik and a Chernomorets in Burgas. And between 2000 & 2010 a whole bunch of weird&random; stuff happened that I just don't know how to coherently explain. I reckon they can simply be mentioned in the Chernomorets Burgas and Neftochimic Burgas 1986 articles as something along the lines of: ""various business dealings led to the formation and dissolution of several clubs including ""Ch.B.B"", ""Ch.B.S."" and ""Ch(B.)"" and, ultimately, led to the current state of the team"". Or something equally inane. I dont know... Basically, both the old Chernomorets's and Naftex are now merged into the current Chernomorets, while the current Neftohimik is a fan's club. got it? -) " +" Allegedly bigoted material Allegedly 'bigoted' material: a section that points out the lack of evidence for commonly asserted theories is being repeatedly removed because, apparently, it does not conform to characteristically neopagan views of the past. This is hardly a neutral point of view. To claim that ""there is no evidence"" to support your assertion that witches were not originally healers or shamans requires that you have significantly researched the topic and are the authority on the history of witchcraft. Any such claims require citation regardless. For example, ""So-and-so says in his this-and-that book that there lacks evidence..."" See Wikipedia:No original research and WP:NPOV. 22:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)" +No problem. Thank you, for illustrating my point of how this place is turning into Wikigulag for its most dedicated contributors. +FWIW, as the editor who reported this user, I believe this may indeed have been a misunderstanding of policy by a new, non native English speaking user, and I would be ok with shortening his block to 'time served'. +Excellent, it will help a lot for un-experienced editors such as me. Regards ) +I would be interested to know what the consensus of that discussion actually is. In any case, creating redirects is one the areas where you should be WP:BOLD, so I was and I created the two above redirects. On the rare possibility that there is ever consensus to move this article to one of those titles, the redirect can be technically deleted allowing for the move. - MrX +" Current Content Enquiries and GA review " +We appreciate your willingness to offer yourself as a sacrifice, Thecolorrose, but somehow, I can't help but think that User sacrifice might be frowned upon by the gods; but that is a good question, Ashnard. What if we asked them what a fitting sacrifice might be? It's not like they're hiding away on some proverbial Mount Olympus where we can't speak to them, are they? +" All userboxes moved to User:UBX's space, now the bot is updating transclusions. — Great. I noticed when I was cleaning all those boxes out of my watchlist that there's at least one odd one: ''' " +Your POV-pushing Hello. I've reverted your edits at the Comparison of the AK-47 and M16. However, given that some of your additions were useful, fell free to add them one by one. You've been told by an admin that translation of references is NOT REQUIRED so if you attempt to delete sourced material you will be banned. +I agree that the aliens do not belong in the character list. That list is already long enough and the aliens are not proper characters. I think the omnitrix information should be merged into the Ben 10 article and the Ben Tennyson information from the character list should be moved into a Ben Tennyson article with as much of the alien information as we can get away with. +Ged UK, just shut UP! Omnigan +i no it would be very interesting to see my poop +I think the fact that she causes so many sad, scared, little men to froth with impotent internet rage is notable enough, n'est-ce pas? 99.17.4.108 +The updates had been done for the most of the race seasons. Before i would close that, i wish everyone in wikipedia to do a good job as of updating the race in season 18, and wish the teams plenty of luck!!! ( ) +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Talk) +REDIRECT Talk:United States Congress Joint Immigration Commission (est. 1907) +Cemeteries== I'll remove those sections from cities in Marion County, Kansas area, though grudgingly. Give me some time to do it. == +This is a fact for which reliable, published sources do exist! +She is known as the highest voice out of the sisters with Toni as their lowest. Her note in Money Can't Buy You Love is D7. Thats pretty high in the whistle register. Thats the top of most Coloratura's ranges. I'm pretty sure she knew how high she was singing. +" The Battle of Tulifinny The date is December 9, 1864, and the place is Tulifinny Creek. Citadel cadets joined with cadets from their sister academy, the Arsenal in Columbia, to form the Battalion of State Cadets. This was different from the Cadet Company. They had been ordered to protect the Tulifinny trestle of the Charleston and Savannah Railroad. The mural depicts the cadets repulsing the attack. North Reference Room Primary Source listed along with info below: http://sciway3.net/clark/jasper/towns.htm ""Before long, firing sounded in Charlestonthe shots that were to blast in pieces this tenurial Southern existence. Grimmer and blacker for the South, the war years rolled slowly on. And on November 30, 1864, there occurred near Grahamville the battle of Honey Hill. For Beaufort District, it meant the beginning of the end. Many stories of this battle have been told and written. An authentic and complete account was written in 1899 by Captain Ben Williams, of Brunson, who was a participant, was then adjutant of his regiment. His articles were published in the News and Courier and in the Hampton County Guardian. Outnumbered five to one, a little band of South Carolina cavalry, infantry and Citadel cadets faced a Federal naval expedition which had advanced up Broad River and disembarked at Boyd’s landing (or Salvesberg, the local name). The enemy’s destination was Grahamville Depot; their real objective the destruction of the railway track according to Sherman’s orders. With seven guns, a well-built breastwork, and the superb strategy of Colonel Charles Jones Colcock, who commanded the Third Military District of the state, the little Confederate band inflicted on the invaders losses amounting to nearly 8oo in a few action-packed hours. Colonel Colcock was everywhere, according to other officers. He even enlisted a strong, blowing wind on his side, having his men to fire a field of broomstraw, so that the flames were hurled into the faces of the enemy at a critical moment. Reinforcements of Georgia Reserves arrived from Savannah hours later, under General Gustavus W. Smith, but the general refused to take over the actual command from one whose ability and success had proved so outstanding. Tales have been told by many elderly local people of the surrounding roads literally running with Negro blood, because more than half the Federal force was made up of Negro regiments trained at Hilton Head. ""You could walk on dead Negroes for miles,"" they declared. Old manuscripts tell further of bodies hastily buried in trenches; of later washing rains exposing a gruesome welter of arms and legs. These bodies later received decent burial in the Federal cemetery at Beaufort. An interesting side light on this battle is the fact that a local Negro, Allen Orr, participated. (He was proud of his service on the Confederate side). As a teen-age boy he went into this battle in which so many of his race were slain, ""Went with a white friend to take care of the horses."" He lived until a few years ago. At the age of 100 years-plus, he enjoyed giving a pantomime of the manner in which he dodged behind the breastwork as the bullets were flying. The breastwork is evident for all to see. A number of cannon balls have been excavated at the site.""" +Sebastian Walker citation 3 is actually a good link but the code is not working properly. if you were to copy the link and paste it into a browser, it is active. have i messed something up with the code or is this a glitch??? please help. +I haven't checked your replacement in detail, but a working example can be found at Discrete_Hilbert_transforms, if that's what you are looking for. There are two key concepts in the article. Fully half of the main section, and all of the math, is devoted to the concept depicted in the figure, which is that of doing piece-wise convolution and creating a seamless result. One has to understand that before the next step makes sense, and it is easier to understand without the unnecessary complexity of circular convolution. Divide and conquer. It's about teaching and understanding, not efficiency. The details of circular convolution aren't included here, because they are explained in other articles. +2012 (UTC) The reasons I dont contribute to Wikipedia anymore Reversions like the one you just executed on the psychology template presuppose a knowledge of psychology. I must imagine that if you don't understand why the template is inadequate then you have not the faintest idea of what constitutes pscyhology. It is a) an academic (taught) discipline, b) a research discipline, c) an applied discipline, d) a profession, interest group and lobby e) a property of of social perception or a folk psychology if you like and f) an aspect of the humanities and the social sciences as well as a peer of psychiatry, social work and in some respects occupational therapy; g) a contested political terrain (which you would understand if a non-amateur had written the articles on critical psychology and cultural-historical psychology). Neither the template nor the main article bring out these distinctions. Instead what you have is a bad summary of a first year textbook of an American perspective on the psychodynamic-post- Skinnerian model of psychology circa 1950s. Having to explain this and to persuade you is hardly what someone with advanced expertise in the area wants to be doing on a Saturday afternoon. It is insulting, demoralizing and a waste of time. I imagine that the net sum of your expertise can probably be located at the lower end of a) or e) in which case you are probably enthuisiastic about your ignorance. So thank you for giving me one more reason not to contribute to wikipedia. A PhD from Yale. What absolute horseshit. I have one from Harvard and another from Cambridge and if you have onefrom Yale I'd be curious where you bought it. Please do pursue it with the relevant authorities you weasel. I notice you have had lots of run ins with people, you officious little troll.41.242.118.144 14:36, 26 May +Also to cross off point 3 about images. +T:ITN Just curious, why do we need to italicise the parentheses of pictured? +I've edited the post by unbolding the markups and uncapped the leters. Therefore, I apologize for my disruptive comments. Once again, thanks for the help, Bluerfn. +" Sorrybut I've had to correct parts of the sentence; it was not accurate. I am using the most-up-to-date sources on this subject and have four decades of experience doing research on this subject, so I really do want to make that clear. If I see something that I know from my knowledge of the sources is inaccurate in emphasis, I am correcting it. Pinter does not write plays ""to express his political causes and beliefs"": that is not an accurate statement (according to my research and other published research on the subject in secondary sources as well as primary onesthe works). He explicitly states that that is not how he goes about writing plays or other creative writing. He does that in essays and speeches, but not in his dramatic works per se. Please do not change the emphasis if this is not a field with which you are familiar based on your citation to one page of one secondary source. (I have the source [Grimes]published and in manuscriptand that is not what he states in it.] Thanks. " +1 July 2005 20:48 (UTC) +Support. Seems obvious and intuitive. (talk) +Kri, don’t tell a biologist he doesn’t know about biology. If humans were as old as Cremo says they are then humans would have had vertebral columns before the earliest forms of segmentation arose. Humans would have had fingers before anything else had fins. Humans would have had kidneys before anything else had protonephridia. And humans would have had well developed endoskeletons before anything else had notochords. The suggestion that humans could have had derived features before those features existed in their most primitive forms is absurd. Furthermore, Cremo’s proposal would have humans living on an earth whose atmosphere they couldn’t even breathe. Also, the genetic distance between humans and chimps and bonobos goes a long way towards establishing our place in the tree of life. Cremo’s bullshit has no place in this article. We shouldn’t pretend that Cremo’s war on reality is anything more than creationism. 76.107.171.90 +Agreed that it contained stupid tags but this page is sensitive and is vandalised by users hostile to the clan of people this article is about. I am protecting this page by vandal protect else please do something to ban this notorious user called User:Holywarrior. He has been doing such things to all the articles on influential or say 'upper' clans of the North Indian social hierarchy. +Well I don't agree but I'll move it back. Sorry for causing so much bother. — (会話) +" Celia (telenovela) For who is constantly erasing what is written in this page we suggest you refer to the history of Celia Cruz and know why she is treated as the most important and influential Latin music singer. Additionally see the novel or read any of the reliable biographies of Celia Cruz where it is evident that the writing on the plot of the series in this page is entirely correct. For this reason while Wikipedia administrators do not take action against your unfounded editings, here we put what should be written on the page, and you insistently erase . Celia (telenovela) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the Spanish-language telenovela. For TV series of Spain, see Celia (TV series). Celia Celia, telenovela.jpg GenreTABTelenovela Created byTAB Andrés Salgado Paul Rodríguez Directed byTAB Víctor Mallarino[1] Liliana Bocanegra [1] StarringTAB Jeimy Osorio Aymeé Nuviola Modesto Lacén Willy Denton Opening themeTAB""La negra tiene tumbao"" by Celia Cruz Country of originTABColombia, United States Original language(s)TABSpanish No. of seasonsTAB1 Production Executive producer(s)TABNelsón Martínez Location(s)TABCartagena, Bogotá, Colombia[2] Release Original networkTAB Telemundo RCN Televisión First shown inTABColombia Original releaseTABOctober 5, 2015 – present Celia, is a Spanish-language telenovela produced by Fox Telecolombia for RCN Televisión and Telemundo.[1] Is based on the life of the most important and influential Latin American singer Celia Cruz.[1][3][4] Plot[edit source | edit] ""Celia"" tells the story and musical legacy of an amazing woman who began her extraordinary career in the midst of the Cuban Revolution, during a time where a female singer had no stage. This lady creates a revolution after imposing respect for women in popular music; she breaks the barriers of racism, she takes over the world with his powerful voice and his appealing style, becoming the universal icon of Latinos Worldwide. Cast[edit source | edit] Actor[1]TABCharacter Jeimy OsorioTABYoung Celia Cruz[5] Aymeé NuviolaTABCelia Cruz[6] Modesto LacénTABYoung Pedro Knight[7] Willy DentonTABPedro Knight[8] Moisés AnguloTABSimón Cruz[9] Margoth VelásquezTABOllita Alfonso[10] Aida BossaTABNoris Alfonso[11] Brenda HanstTABAna Alfonso[12] Carolina SabinoTABMyrta Silva[13] Abel RodríguezTABEliécer Calvo[14] Carolina GaitánTABLola Calvo[15] Jonathan Islas[16]TABMario Agüero[17] Luciano D'Alessandro[18]TABAlberto Blanco[19] Alberto PujolTABRogelio Martínez[20] Indhira SerranoTABMyrelys Bocanegra[21] José NarváezTABRené Neira Jorge CardenasTABCaíto Michell GuilloTABGamaiel ""Gamita"" Alfonso Juan Alfonso BaptistaTABRamón Cabrera Carlos VesgaTABBilly Mijail MulkayTABTito Fuentes Audience[edit source | edit] In Colombia, the series premiered with 13.3 of rating, exceeding the program La Voz Kids Colombia.[22]In the United States the series debuted with 2.38 million viewers.[23] Broadcast[edit source | edit] The series premiered on October 5, 2015, in Colombia on RCN Televisión,[24]on October 13, 2015, in United States on Telemundo.[2]" +In re: Neelix's statement above - all of my edits have come from a single device, as I assume you can see. I was focused on my own edits during the hours spent editing that you mention, but I will be vigilant about deleting vandalism going forward. The fact that I've edited sparingly until now doesn't really have any bearing on the issues you bring up and makes none of your accusations more or less likely, and certainly provides no evidence for them. I assure you that my edits are an attempt to improve the quality of the article, and think there is a very good reason to believe that: they have been making this article more concise and less repetitious while keeping its most important points and ideas intact. +Ad hominem? Do you think you (Maunus, Slrubenstein) may be cherry picking the worst personal details you can find on Freeman in the most one sided sources and largely ignoring the factual details of the controversy? I'm especially disturbed by the heavy reliance on Shankman and the absence of Martin Orans. I can balance with some material from Orans myself. +No. NPOV is a core policy and there is no scope for compromise. 190.44.158.38 +I think old name of this article (Magnus the Strong) is better, because Magnus was only pretender to crown. In all sources he is mentioned as pretender in time of civil war for Swedish crown, who controlled Götaland, but never as king of Götaland. +" Merger proposal I propose that List of slums in Swaziland be merged into Swaziland#Geography. —rybec " +" Jude the Apostle The Red Pen of Doom" +" English translations For the curious, could someone provide English translations for the French track names using the ""note="" field? " +Edit request from Tirili147, 19 April 2010 A small number of dugongs are also found in the Straits of Johor (which separates Johor in Malaysia and Singapore), in the Philippine provinces of Palawan, Romblon, Guimaras and Davao Oriental, in the Arabian Sea along Pakistan and in the Red Sea in Egypt provinces Marsa Alam. The Dugong reported to be at Marsa Abu Dabbab moved away from there. Was at Marsa Alam early April in the Marsa Shagra Eco-lodge (Red Sea Diving Safari), that's why I know this. You may verify with staff there. +October 2010 (UTC) I would say that is original research; what we really need is an explicit source saying the two have been conflated to no end. (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 13:20, 30 +Do you have third-party sourcing for notability independent of the trial?Scott Mac +9 new references in major newspapers I've added 9 new references from France's newspaper equivalences of the NY Times, the Le Figaro and Le Monde to the sandboxed version of the article. It was strange that a scientist of Marcel Leroux' obvious stature, was not being written about and quoted in major newspapers in France. His stature was apparent from the articles he was writing. He was the scientist solicited to write articles on any unusual weather patterns affecting France and N. Africa. It turns out the major newspapers are paywalled and don't allow google searches. +" Your vandalism on Vani Hari Please revert your bad-faith vandalism of Vani Hari in the removal of an entire criticism section. You claimed that the sources were unviable but ""Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications."" If you do not revert I will be forced to report your vandalism." +" MAGHASITO 2 USer:Maghasito try to spread of pseudo science, the so-called Hungarian Turanism , which is now a politically motivated chauvinist pseudo-science from the 19th century and a core agenda of far right Jobbik party and ww2 nazi Arrow Cross Party . There are not a single contemporary scholar (academics university professors) linguistics, historian, population geneticist on this planet, who support that fantasy theory. Wikikpedia is a free encyclopedia, however it is not the place of the popularization of pseudo-scientific politically-motivated fantastic nonsenses. The best option would be the permanent ban of Maghasito. Thank you! I believe that he is from a worker class family (as most of the Turanist believers), he migrated to UK or USA as a an economic-refugee due to the economic crisis. Many of this turanist boys read the esoteric pseudo-scientific books of the so-called self-appointed turanist ""shaman-scholars"". These shaman ""scholars"" are usually electricians, blacksmiths, masons, car-mechanic in the real life, so they have no any university degrees. These less educated worker-class boys admired them as knowledgeable expert. Just read our discussions in the talkpage of Hungarian turanism: Forexample he consider Ferenc Zajti (shaman-scholar) as one of the greatest historian, Zajti was who invented the theory of Parthian - Hungarian Jesus. (according to Zajti Jesus Christ was not a Jew but a proto-Hungarian). These turan-believer-boys are often racist, they consider the Indo-Europeans and Semitic people and their culture as inferior and subhuman who created a very low primitive culture, and they consider the culture and race of Central Asian nomadic Turkic people as superior culture and race. " +Thanks for messing with my scratchpad. Real kind of you to violate me. I mean it's nice that the copyright guys have avatars like you that act on harmless things without any kind of cease and desist letters from layers. Not vindictive at all. +Interesting I've just read this: http://www.umich.edu/~newsinfo/Releases/2000/Jan00/r011000b.html . Can it be put into the article? 86.57.254.215 +Well, in actually fact, there is tons of pages related to Sydney on Wikipedia. I'm terribly sick of you Michael, you always have something to disagree with about me and the things I tried to do. And as I said, I've learnt my leason Michael, I know what is accepted on Wikipedia and what isn't. +This is your last warning. Stop entering uncited content or I will contact an editor and have you banned for a time. You are playing by your own version of the rules and will be dealt with. +"==Vandalism Manifesto. Pass to all Wikians== VANDALISM IS GOOD. Vandalism does not come from a sheer desire to cause harm. Vandals do their thing all over Wiki, 24/7, from frustration and hatred, because incompetent ""editors"" who have no skills, no degrees, no expertise, usually no names, have done multiple reverts and edits of the work of others. Vandalism is a good and natural response to no-lifers (as in Get a Life) who do 7000 edits, 10,000 edits a year and who have actual Watch Lists of 1,300 or more and are proud of it. These jerks deserve have their own pages vandalized, over and over as long as they are in effect, vandalizing the pages of others in the name of being a cop. Vandals keep no-life editors, admins, bureaucrats and stewards honest, or at least busy, reverting the reverts they get on their own pages. VANDALISM IS GOOD. It helps drive these nutcases into the ground with nervous breakdowns. The Culture of Wikipedia is very,very sick, and Vandals are needed to ""cull the herd"". SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL VANDAL. Vandal God" +" Looking around to see what's been going on, I hope you forgive me for saying that I don't believe you may be acting in good faith here yourself. Without getting dragged into this mess myself, the long and short of it is simply that you were quite recently involved in a dispute with -Ril-. Also, it sounds (""He would also have contacted those who actually worked in the area"") that you certainly have a vested interest in the topic as well (and for the last time, I don't CARE one way or the other on the topic, and I came across this on AfD as I'm sure others did). So, I'm still planning on removing that statement, but I would like to hear from someone not involved in all of this. I'll look into it on my own if you don't in the next few days. " +Magashito, you try to promote a pseudo-historic fairy tale, which had no linguistic historic and genetic background. Do not try to interpret the opinion of real scholars (academic scholars university professors) as racism. Or did you forget the Armenian genocide (where turanism played a part) or Szálasi system (the turanism was also its core belief)? I think do you support uneducated self-appointed shaman scholars like Badiny or Zajti, who invented the parthian-Hungarianan Jesus tale. Badiny and Zajdi did not have any university degree in linguistic or history. So they were self-appointed shaman scholars. Zajti was just a librarian (not a serious job and degree). Technological development is part of the culture. But can we talk about central asian theatricals? Novels? Philosophers? ? Paintings, sculpture, and serious architecture? Or wat does culture means for you? Be serious, you try to defend a clown-like losing case, which lies discredited the Hungarian people in so many times in Europe. +Why are my posts being deleted? I have tried to make a discussion here and the user Deepak keeps erasing them. Can someone help me? I am not allowed to complain to much becuase he might block me. So I have to be careful. Can someone help me? +" I am shocked by your name on Wikipedia, and I wonder if you are a serious person, but for now I am not digging into that. You may have seen a controversial (very religious bio-article which I tried to write) was criticized, and you may think that this author was an easy ""target"". I have once before been up against an editor who really only wanted to get power over Wikipedia in order to spread some political issues, so therefore I am going into details about this later. " +Movies are Canon. Take the Garlic Junior saga for example. Onio is only a joke. There are other parodies that have other super saiyans in it. Onio is more of a fan work done by Toriyama than an actual creation. Movies are part of the dragonball series. Onio should be removed. He doesn't match the dragonball continuity. Goku appeared in Robot Chicken but I don't hear you arguing about it. Lets just stick with the anime, movies, and dragonball series manga. +"07:59, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) Question about number of edits Hello, since the welcome message to my talk page came from you, I presume you're the person I should turn to with any questions. I notice that every time anyone makes a change in an article, the old and new versions are stored in the history page. I'm not terribly computer literate, but it seems that that would take up a lot of space, and I presume Wikipedia doesn't have infinite webspace. If I see an incorrect comma in the third paragraph, a spelling error in the fifth, an incorrect link in the sixth, an incorrect date in the eighth, and unclear wording in the thirteenth, does Wikipedia prefer that I do one big edit so that it will have only one new page to store, or is it okay to save as I go along? Are the individual versions in the history page deleted after a certain length of time? I've been editing my user page, and just wonder whether I should leave changes until I have something big to change. Thanks 20:39, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) (Butting in here, again, as people ask more interesting questions on Mel's talk page than on mine). Ann, firstly, diskspace is so incredibly cheap that you could type flat out for your whole life and you wouldn't fill a drive that cost 100 euros; so don't worry about diskspace. This issue of what to do in an individual edit is one purely for the convenience of other people who are reading it. So if you're doing a bunch of fairly trivial tweaks (fixing grammar, spelling, formatting, etc) then do all of those in one go (and give an edit summary like ""various grammar and spelling tweaks"". If the article needs tweaks and also need a higher-level change (adding or removing a big chunk of text, fixing some wording that you thing is seriously incorrect or misreading) then do the trivial fixes in one edit, and the other fix in another (with an edit summary like ""removing nonsense about Father Dougal""). So (in summary) make changes based on what is a logical unit, not what's convenient for the software. (talk | contribs) 21:35, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) (Thanks for this; I've copied it to Ann Heghan's Talk page) (Μελ Ετητης) " +" I won't insist much here, because Wikipolicy is weak. It just says: Secondary sources are second-hand accounts, at least one step removed from an event. They rely for their material on primary sources, often making analytic or evaluative claims about them. For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research. This publication is from 1635 (in fact you should have seen that it's in a print, and Guttenberg hadn't invented the press in the 15th century yet), and is talking about a person who had lived two centuries before: Skanderbeg died in 1468 and his father, (who had supposedly been in Kastoria) died in the 1430s, so Bardhi, the author, a catholic bishop, wrote more than two full centuries after. Still, probably even the translation is wrong, so I will leave this in the memory of the talk page, so that a latinist might solve it. Let's talk " +RE: Barnstar Thank-you very much for the barnstar! Have an excellent day. (Chat) +'Leaders', delegates and managers in various fields of endeavour, yes, but hopefully no-one corresponding to Mugabe, (;-) +" Daniel, As i indicated to you via email, Wikipedia is not your plaything by which you determine what may or may not be ""constructive"". It is a record of fact, particularly historical fact. For example, you might not find the revelation of your own peccadillos constructive, but that doesn't change their basis in fact, ergo their place in Wikipedia. You might think that Wikipedia as it relates to individual schools should only contain puff pieces, but by acting on that you are violating the spirit of this site as well as your stated position of being an ""inclusionist"". The world hates a hypocrite, son." +Talk:Responsive web design#Reactive Web Design]]. [[ +"When you enter a special stage the splash screen says ""Sonic the Hedgehog CD"" this is the correct title94.168.197.209 " +Thanks Thanks for sorting out that blocking error. Looks like you just became an admin, so congrats on that! (let's chat) +Please read WP:DUCK +Quite. (And he is an excellent writer as well, as his shareholder letters on the BH site demonstrate.) But this neither explains nor sources the statement in the intro paragraph the topic of this section. +" That does not make it yours; when you hit ""save"" you automatically surrender all rights to it. On your second point, your participation here is a privilege, not a right. > haneʼ " +, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Sincerely, I don't have much clue of where I'll be in the beginning of March, but I'll probably be able to make it to one of the meetings. Right now I think Rio is the most likely candidate. 20:16 +I wasn't around a year ago. We can say what it is - but only in extremely broad terms: Philosophy is (at least part of the) Western Intellectual Tradition and it asks three broad questions common to all known featherless bipeds which are rational beings (the Greek term which identifies human beings, or homo sapiens. And it asks, in general three (3) fundamental questions: (1) What is it to know? knowledge; [[[epistemology]] (2) What is it to be? metaphysics; ontology, existence (3) What is it to do the right thing? ethics Philosophy of Peanuts I'm unfamiliar with. Perhaps you mean the Philosophy of Beans. Pythagoras had written, 'On Beans, and a professor of mine at City College - by the name of (Hutchinson]] - demonstrated - sarcastically I might add - that one could construct a corriculum on anything - including a Philosophy of Quizine!!! +" Q: ""Name a Heideggerian concept the Current Wikipedia Article on Martin Heidegger successfully explains..."" A: ""There is none.""" +"I'm not even sure the film says that Evolution is ""atheistic"", let alone Science. What it does is allows others (e.g., Richard Dawkins) to explain how, when they fully embraced evolution, it freed them of the perceived constraints they associated with theism. Does the film go beyond that and declare evolution to be atheistic? How? " +Titanium (Song) The reason why I changed the charts in Titanium is mainly becuase I love the song, Sia is amazing, and I just want it to be more popular. So, I changed it to let people know it has good numbers and would like the song!!!!!!!!!!! Ethanborden +Eastern Armenia was a puppet-state of the Parthians +June 2007 Talk / Contribs +Notes Content merged in from Parchis (group) per merge tag. 2 articles disagree on year the band broke up; es:wp says 1985. The Continuum encyclopedia of popular music of the world or Encyclopedia of world pop music might have a ref for discographies etc. / +Tks mate, have a terrific day! Cheers, +No worries. Where'd you get all the info from? +NO BOOKS NONE of her book are listed by the library of congress at ALL http://catalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=Stephanie+Adams&Search;_Code=TALL&PID;=11203&SEQ;=20060527041220&CNT;=25&HIST;=1 NONE +So you are saying the racist stereotypes are okay in the intro because the rest of the section is written more reasonably?? +" I have posted your statement Ms Gale to many members of the research community who entirley disagree with your Gardner Theory. Are you a communist? Because, by not allowing other theories, you must be. Who are you to promote the TIGHAR theory? The TIGHAR hypothesis is a theory. It has un-supporting evidence. They have not found anything which could be found on any deserted island.However, you choose to envoke your powers as ""Editor"" to make sure nothing but the Gardner theory fits into the disappearance. " +Maybe Maybe i should just go to Wild Ones Wiki instead...... +" Richest Man in Japan Contradiction: ""As of 2008, Yamauchi is the richest person in Japan and 149th richest person in the world, having a net worth of approximately $7.8 billion.[1]"" ""He is currently the third richest man in Japan [2] due to his shares in Nintendo since their success with the Wii and Nintendo DS consoles."" These are quoted from the beginning and end of the article repectively. I understand that they are technically both correct (""as of 2008"" vs. ""currently""); however, it would probably be clearer to state merely one or the other." +WP:AGF seems to be being ignored. +Cm Puke sucks. The one who will win mitb will either be jeff hardy or orton. Wrestlinglover420 +" September 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to De Morgan's laws, you will be blocked from editing. T/C If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." +Loser F- -!!! F- -!!! F- -!!! Grawp !!! +2008 (UTC) Also, the MacKenzie's drank Molsen and assorted Canadian beers. dan 19:21, 21 August +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to New Zealand, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. " +fuck you cracker nerd +, 20 September 2005 (UTC) ... or (C) their loved one is brought back to life. (B) is by far the most likely though. | Talk 00:38 +The first concept that is necessary to change is geometric one since that always the variation of n dimensions generate n+1 dimensions. Then it would have necessary that to introduce a geometric pentacontinuous frame for to describe the Einstein’s gravity wave. But the greatest problem is the conceptual change of all categories of tetra to penta physics of the movement and its philosophical consequences. +REDIRECT Talk:Manuel Fernández Juncos +I like the term Eastern Eurasian better than Mongoloid. +. From a liability standpoint, there is not an issue because it is now multiple wire services reporting the same thing +" for example, if i were to say that you are ""defficient in the immoral"" then to you it is not a personl attack as you consider that to be good, but if i menat it to be an attack, then it is... it is your inner setiment that dictates the way you interpret it as good or as bad... but it is not in the thing itself, or what i menat it to be... open your eyes to reality and wake up from your conditioned sleep ;) read above, what is it to be moral anyway? you fool - maybe it is good to be a fool, but if you think it is not, then that is youre propblem ;) i cant be held accountable for your inner interpretatons and psychology ;)" +Per the website from where the information came, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/wace/biodict.html , this is in the public domain. +One other aspect. I have not edited this article outside of population references. Any other edits that have been made regarding facts outside of the article have not been done by other editors. If you so choose to edit them I do not have a problem along as appropriate citations is provided. Again the population should remain however. +, 14 May 2006 (UTC)hganesan Wow that is SO Funny. I did not dig up for the championship ring fact. LOL I did check for the standard 15 pt stat. 21:04 +with other people's comments +" Assessment ""Writing in 1833, before the restoration of 1840 ..."". What restoration of 1840?" +":*Regarding a working group to develop the ""Responses"" section... I don't know that I personally would have a lot of energy for that. I wanted to work on the article until it was no longer terrible, and I think that goal was largely achieved. The Gorsevsky discussion has perhaps for me been about maintaining that standard. There are refinements the article could use (I'd particularly love to rewrite the ""Overview"" section but need sources), but they don't seem pressing relative to the need to attend to other aspects of my life. Creating a fuller ""Responses"" section would be nice, but isn't a priority for me. I agree with your assessment that ""it's hard to learn"" is the biggest issue with NVC. There's also no standardized curriculum for it, and the way it's taught is constantly evolving. When it comes to criticism, I wish there could be some distinction between criticizing the core ideas of NVC and criticizing Rosenberg's presentation of it. Though I suppose that's a hard distinction for outsiders to make. There are a few things that Rosenberg says that I don't agree with, or ways he says things that are exaggerated, perhaps to try to shock people into seeing things differently in a teaching context but none of those are the core of NVC, and other trainers including myself present NVC in ways that don't include those elements that are easy to take exception to, yet which still capture all the core ideas. " +" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (86.10.156.127) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! TC " +Yes I'd agree. You're going nowhere. I looked at the opposition and they appear to be in North America. Amazing. They know more about us than we do here? Incredible. +" I have a feeling some of this article was written by Daniele Ledonne himself, e.g. the part listing all the films he made that are not especially notable. I looked at the history and a user named ""Tolka"" made much of that addition, and in the original version it even said one of his films was available for purchase at the national film network. Is he advertising here? I agree this article isn't noteworthy enough (and doesn't have any citations really) to stand on it's own and should be merged with Super Columbine Massacre RPG! article. " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Brooks, Maine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. // Talk // Contribs " +Thanks for lifting the block Balloonman, but I appear to have been autoblocked as well, so I still can't edit. Is that another part of my punishment? +Ed Poor Against my better judgement, but out of courtesy, which I promised to Duk before, I wanted to mention that I mentioned your name again on my talk page. +my source is a track map that i downloaded that refers to the platform as boland's landing, and when a m7 set is making a scheduled stop there, the computer will announce boland's landing. +" Don't let it get to you that bad. You are right. A hamlet is different from a town and Loudonville is most definitely a hamlet. Take a deep breath, have a fun Friday night, and come back tomorrow. -) ~ ''''''«talkstalk» " +So your that Dr Who hoaxer to. +That blanket prejudice against everyone from the south east is also akin to racism. Have you met everyone from the south east, or are you just generalising wildly? The latter obviously. +Thanks Again Wow whats with this vandalism on my page, thanks again +" hmmm, robbins Forgive me for bothering you again with news of it lol:) One of the problems may be that there's not many editors working on it. Soon I'm going to let this lie, and see if this editor disappears for a while. If not, it may have to go to an informal mediation. " +Jeffrey Combs Hello, I see that you recently reverted mine and someone elses edits to Jeffrey Combs here. I am curious to know why mine were reverted as well. The only thing I added were three returns so that the template at the bottom could be fully seen. I'll await your response to put them back, as I'm not all that familiar if adding hoards of 's is against some policy. Thanks for you time, +" Golden Foot Award Thanks for reverting the cut-and-paste move of this article. I renamed it to the the capital ""A"" version, but after some browsing of the relevant sources decided to move it again to the simpler Golden Foot. That is what it is almost universally referred to as, and it's consistent with for instance Golden Boot. If you disagree, I'll revert and create a WP:RM request to get a full debate. " +I am not aware of wikipedia guidelines regarding poopie pants, though I'm pretty sure there is at least implicit consensus that having them is not good. I am also pretty sure that somehow your pants, physically, spiritually or metaphorically are full of poop. The only reason that you consider comments like this to be personal attacks is because your pants are so woefully full of poop (in one of the aforementioned modalities). Your contributions to , Benzodiazepines and poop (which may lead you to pages with information useful for removing it from your pants). You're not the boss of me. +REDIRECT Talk:Universe of Energy +REDIRECT Talk:List of heads of government of the Mexican Federal District +Are you brooding about colours nuances, violets Category:Shades of violets ? +Wikipedia articles not relevant nor accurate It is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. You can revert it and make Wikipedia articles not relevant nor accurate as this is becoming ever more common and known in the internet community. Do a little research and you will see that everything I had changed was FACTUAL. End of Story. +Juneteenth Ironic that you would refer me to the Talk Rules, oh WikiCop... The sections I was removing were sections of a talk page added by people using the page as a forum rather than discussing the article itself, which is clearly against Talk rules. Also lots of spam sections that were added, so I cleaned up the page. So you should probably review what was removed/edited before you get all bent out of shape...but whatever you have to do to make yourself feel important, I guess. +deleted entry Hi Kurykh- I'm a reporter with the Allentown Morning Call hoping to interview you for a story about a deleted Wikipedia entry. Can I e-mail you somewhere so we can correspond today? Thanks. +" ""Help, Help, I'm being repressed!"" – ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ " +Well you can't risk being blocked and thus your version of this article being reverted -so of course you're amused (as a misdirection). More importantly you've dodged addressing the scientific point(s). Also like a predictable troll you took the 'mispeling bait' (overlooking the correctly spelled version earlier in the sentence) and went on and bloviated from there hoping your futile misdirection would 'stick'. LOL - we'll something sticks - that's fo sure. But of course, you then had to follow up with a diaply of your immense knowledge of WP procedures etc etc no doubt trolling for a 'barn fish to the head -whack!' or whatever! lol. Oh yes - but of course YOUR tolerance and amusement and 'advise' and complicity (via fantasy slam remarks) attests to your overblown view of yourself and delusions about your skill in rightly dividing 'worth' from 'worthless'. Your reward is that all your time spent here will be to no avail when it all gets 'speed deleted' and 'reverted' with the same air of arrogance as you have demonstrated here. What comes around goes around - lol. Carry on fool cs the youngins' need to see a sterling example of a blowhard editor like yourself to realize to steer clear of such a time-wasting task and exercise in self-delusion/power tripping. +You are a notorious editor who has made the past couple of days a nightmare. You filed a report on me when all the disruption was on your side. I bet the proof has gone too. What a fucking mess. You tried to destroy a page that gets over 10,000 views a day - all I did was try and make it right, and you know it. Fuck you, and your anti-Welsh hatred too. +(last warning for removing content) +" The infamous block Veritas: do not get Wikinoid yet. The policy is on my side: it was a totally unjust block and I am appealing. I still trust Wikipedia. I don't trust so much certain wikipedians and administrators but I have faith that in the end truth, justice and NPOV shall prevail. If not in the ANI, where admins seem to behave like a wolfpack, at least in first instance, in ArbCom. Policy is very clear and Shell Kinney simply broke all rules. In my appeal I also ask for Shell to be recused from further cases against me or related to the controversial article due to bias and misuse of admin privileges. I won't go back to that article at least in a looooong while. I've reached my personal limit with it and after all non-existent races are not my primary interest. I believe though that all this conflict will help to raise awareness about what is going on in that battlefield... (oops! article) and specially about Thulean's wikilawyerist attitude. Besides it may also raise awareness about misuse of policy by certain admins that never admit any error nor fulfill their duties. Ironically Shell Kinney is running for ArbCom herself. Guess that her campaign is something like ""Wikipedia needs an iron man and that's me"" of Thatcher. I don't know. I'm voting a more promising candidate. Enjoy, " +Commentary, perhaps? I believe the first season of the show has been released on DVD. If this is true, I'd like to know if there was any official commentary provided; e.g. What were the inspirations for some of the characters, the opinions of some of the producers or the creator's opinions on some of the characters, etc. Anyone who knows of this sort of commentary being mentioned is welcome to add it in in the appropriate places (for instance, commentary on character Jiggers would be put somewhere in his section), but please do not forget to mention that it comes from the DVD commentary! Thank you. +Dennis Brown == I am User:King Genovese, I have Understood Wikipedia and I am following all rules, I have referenced very well. When I first joined Wikipedia, I had King Genovese and I didn't understand how to Reference, I'm saying sorry and I hope we can leave the past and look onto the future. If you will allow me to creating Mob Related Articles, I'll be out of your hair. Let's be positive about this, and give me another chance to reedem myself. I have blocked this self-confessed sock, and in view of the repeated socking upgraded the master account to indef. This person really doesn't get it and will IMO have to make a convincing request to be allowed back in. And Genovese, you can't say you follow all rules, then break them by creating new accounts over and over. That is breaking the rules itself, and causing a lot of work for others to clean up. Maybe you would be better finding a different hobby other than Wikipedia. - 2¢ © Join WER == +" Thanks for the correction! -''''''TheFortyFive " +TODAY SHOW HAS BEEN NUMBERf 1 FOR 15 YEARS. MATT HAS BEEN ON THE SHO SINCE 1994 AND NATALIE HAS BEEN ON SINCE 2003 +Hot dog city is extremely popular in my area, and many people have requested it to be placed on wikipedia +I Would appreciate it if you would not cause vandalism to my talk page. Thank You +" The User:CFIF and his band of blaggers The following was to go on the talk page of User:Firsfron who is obviously in league with User:CFIF in an attempt to muzzle those who do not agree with them: " +new toy and me have developed a new toy (discussion): Implemented in an article it can look like in Mongol bow (including some misunderstanding) or Indian Wars. While we (mostly me) think it is a great thing (contrary to the long frustrating negotiations for images that can not keep up with the rapid expansion of articles and new requests), it would require some people to use it and not overdo it. You just have to google missing images and insert the url with a short description. I would really appreciate it, especially for the feedback. Thank you a lot. Greatings +Tad Jones Cbl, watch when you link to Tad Jones. T. A. Dwight Jones is the correct link for the college football figure. Tad Jones is a different person. +To be included Notes to self (or anyone else with time to contribute): Noble Drew Ali's Moorish Scientists (religion), Juneteenth (holidays). +Otherwise, place all new threads above that one. +I knew you were a dick but a fag too? nice job on the morgan discussion I liked how you buried the comments in the archive section +I restored the Palmerston quote with a link. Could not find a source online for the Campbell-Bannerman quote, and the sources I did find disagreed over whether it was from 1902 or from the 1907 conference. Might have to look to hardcopy somewhere. +Essentially this list makes no sense. Instead of scouring the net for that one silly article that will drop the emo buzzword in reference to a band that has nothing to do with it (that's what is going on in some cases), shouldn't this be relying on more of a consensus for whether or not a band is emo? You may find one article to call AFI emo, but for every one of those, you can find hundreds that wouldn't dare throw them into that. That doesn't mean the consensus is right 100% of the time, but there's something wrong with the idea of trying to find one person dumb enough to call a band emo so they can be included on some list. +" WHAT ADVERTISMENT DID I PUT? I can't believe what you say and do. You're just horrible! Your quote doesn't say that my article doesn't qualify either.... ""If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article."" that's just saying what IS allowed, not what IS NOT. Though, i'm done checking back here because you're obviously not playing with a full deck. " +Nature News has an article on the new BEST draft paper , which also covers criticisms from McKitrick and Curry. Might be some material we can use. +" Yup, his username just needs to be added under 'Approved Users' ) — ¿? " +This is great, thank you ! I think that the article will be sent to Peer Review in the not too distant future. +" I'm afraid that you're right — I've made a start, though (I'm working my way forward from 1940 in the Lists of number-one hits in the United States if you'd like to work back from 2005...). (Talk) " +":I was not notified about the deletion suggestion before the PROD expired, so I didn't find out about the deletion until now. I do not see how either of the two guidelines you quoted are applicable in this case. The article to which Vatican twins redirected was merged into the sibling article, not deleted. For this reason, it would make sense for Vatican twins to now redirect to the ""Irish twins"" section of sibling. As for WP:WINAD, that guideline was written in order to keep unencyclopedic stubs from being created. If a concept has two different names, either name should direct a user to the appropriate article when it is typed into the search bar. That is the purpose of redirects. Would you object if I recreated Vatican twins as a redirect to Sibling#Irish_twins? " +" Iraq section way too long Could someone clean it up/move it to another article? Right now it is too much for a casual reader to go through in one breath. In code there is a rule of thumb that any ""function"" (unit) should be less than 25 lines. Perhaps wikipedia coule do something similar either with articles or with sections." +oi i didnt do anything wrong. give me prove that i vandalised then i will believe you. +October 2008 (UTC) Of course,I would my best,kinda busy lately though. 02:26, 27 +Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Offspringheadaroundyoucover.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Offspringheadaroundyoucover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. +New Arabic linguistics article Musy, I started a new article—List of traditional Arabic place names. Would you like to get involved? ^^ I got tired of other editors mangling the detailed Arabic linguistics I put up (deleting diacritics such as emphatic dots, etc.). - 28 June 2005 04:17 (UTC) +" I recommend you start from scratch - as you have already been advised, that type of promotion cannot be permitted even in your userspace. It CANNOT be created as an actual article yet, you either need to make a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, or use the articles for creation process &L; " +He can voice that opinion because (a) he is correct, the sources only say he was Jewish, but not that this is relevant to this writings on racism ; (b) it is established Wikipedia policy that we don't call out a person's background - be it racial, religious or ethnic or other - unless it is pertinent to the topic as evidenced by reliable sources making that connection; and (c) this is the consensus on this page - 3 editors have told you that what you are proposing is not acceptable, it is time for you to stop edit warring it back into the article. +" Um, and that helps wikipedia, how?? How is it alright for an editor to stlak my edits and threaten with speedy deletions but I am not free to remove their posts? Isn't it my talk page? Blofeld - " +" Conflict of interest note By your user name, it appears that you represent a company or organization. Please read our conflict of interest guidelines as well as our FAQ for businesses. We welcome your contributions here, but please refrain from writing about your own company's services and personnel. Thanks, and happy editing! ''''''Speaketh " +"Sad...a nonsensical sentence (""When he born he was just called ""Sam"") managed to survive here for four months. Sigh... k 23:32, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)" +Other Autograph Books Feel free to add your autograph book preceded by a * (to bullet the list) in alphabetical order by clicking here! +":""(as well as in the Middle East and elsewhere""That includes any other usage.he should be removed as a questionable source. " +It's already written, just in a separate article. See In the Groove (series)#Common Gameplay Elements. (ζ) +" I still don't think ""Unlettered"" should appear in the infobox beside Education as that is over-simplifying the situation. I'm all in favour of this fact and its significance as determined by scholars appearing in the article, though. talk to me " +" Well, an awful lot of people disagree with you, many if not most of whom are Irish and live in Ireland. There are, additionally, very many sources which refer to ""the British Isles and Ireland"" so it makes one wonder about why certain editors here are so keen to assert that there is no dispute about what constitutes this ""British Isles"" entity (if it can be called that) when there clearly is a great deal of dispute about it. " +Thanks. I understand that you are trying to make a compromise. But you will agree that my version is better. I was explaining what the language of the city is, you are explaining what it is not. You know, some people are trying to deny that people there are speaking a turkic language. It is interessting to know that local people call the language Turkish. Indeed in Iran when you say someone is speaking turkish, you mean he is speking Azerbaijani. Anyway I'll prefer if you remove the reference to Tat language and replace Azeri with the scientifically recognized name Azerbaijani_language. Latter I will add a language subsection under culture so there will be no complaint about disruptive sentencing. +, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Note that the blocking admin responded to my request for an unblock at Wikipedia:ANI#User:Shaheenjim. In it, he alleged that a single revert, along with discussions on the talk page, is edit-warring. Obviously an allegation that laughable is evidence that it's a pretext, and his real motivation is retaliation, since he's involved in the dispute. He also cited two prior blocks. First of all, note that two or three alleged violations over the course of years of productive editing is nothing. And second, those other two blocks were both ridiuclous too. In one I was blocked for violating the 3RR, even though I only reverted 3 times in a day. And in the other I was blocked for allegedly posting OR, even though I posted a source, so obviously it wasn't OR. - 23:09 +Just for the record, that IP is blocked for 24 hours already. - | dance in the air and follow his steps +" 4th paragraph The 4th paragraph is wrong. The black body temperature of the Earth is 5.5 °C.[4] Since the Earth reflects about 28% of incoming sunlight[5], in the absence of the greenhouse effect the planet's mean temperature would be far lower - about -18 or -19 °C [6][7] instead of the much higher current mean temperature, about 14 °C. The black body temperature of the Earth is -18 or -19 °C, not 5.5 °C (which is the temperature of an ideal blackbody the same distance from the Sun as the Earth). It was correct before it was changed on Dec 9,2009. Also, reference [4] does not support that statement. I suggest the following as a possible replacement paragraph and even as a possible first paragraph since it actually defines what Greenhouse Effect really refers to. If an ideal thermally conductive blackbody was the same distance from the Sun as the Earth, it would have an expected blackbody temperature of 5.3 °C. However, since the Earth reflects about 30%NASA Earth Fact Sheet (or 28%Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry, by Daniel J. Jacob, Princeton University Press, 1999. Chapter 7, ""The Greenhouse Effect"".) of the incoming sunlight, the planet's actual blackbody temperature is about -18 or -19 °C Solar Radiation and the Earth's Energy BalanceIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. Chapter 1: Historical overview of climate change science page 97, about 33°C below the actual surface temperature of about 14 °C or 15 °C.The elusive ""absolute surface air temperature,"" see GISS discussion The mechanism that produces this difference between the actual temperature and the blackbody temperature is due to the atmosphere and is known as the Greenhouse Effect. Note that I also modified the expected temperature and albedo based on NASA data. If the values in the current paragraph are used in Stephan's equation, 5.5°C with no reflection is associated with -16.5°C with 28% reflection and -18°C with 30%. " +"====Regarding edits made during August 9 2006 (UTC) to Damien Echols==== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. don't talk email me " +Belief does not equate to theory, just read the article about theory and you would find that out. Beliefs are random whereas theories have to have evidence and be testable. +" Bob Ross edits What we have here is a failure to communicate. You stated that certain details pertaining to Bob Ross' life were not pertinent to the article. Specifically, details about his wives. This information isn't trivial content. Details about lots of notable individuals' nonnotable spouses permeates Wikipeda unrelentingly. Properly sourced information about significant events in people's lives, such as marriage, divorce, births/deaths of loved ones, is not the same as saying, ""Bob Ross like cheese,"" even if one were to find a source for that statement. Your deletion of this isnormation does, in fact, fly in the face of well-established community-driven consensus. Examine any biographical article, and you will find lots of information, [presumably] properly sourced, that you, as an apparent deletionist, might find strictly banal and useless. It should be noted that the details about his wives was very short, noting only their names (obviously their last names were Ross, and unless their maiden names were in a source, one could not publish it) and the durations of their marriages. Such a short, sourced statement is surely not worth pursuing like this. Yuor edits were reverted because you did not provide a valid reason for soing so. As per the widely-held and practiced policy of including any properly sourced information in biographical articles mentioned above, you need to discuss first changes which go against the consensus. There's always the possibility that you might provide convincing arguments, and even influence consensus-driven policies but definitely not in this case. The users who addressed your actions are well-seasoned, and are familiar with the consensus to the point of being able to enforce it on matters presicely like this without needing to query the community. For you to be able to make the changes you made as I said you must discuss it first. Making changes that violate policy can easily be construed as vandalism it suggests that you either didn't read or care to abide by the community standards but that is incorrect. The policy of vandalism states, in part:Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.It appears to me that you indended to be helpful, as a deletionist, but it flew in the face of established community consensus and policy. I will remind those editors who made those comments to you about vandalism the specific of policy, but the bottom line is: do not remove properly sourced information from Wikipedia without prior discussion. This is really not a matter of needing to arbitrate, because this is a matter of content dispute, which whould be discussed on appropriate talk pages. -  talk " +Deletion discussion I simply don't understand how this could have been a CSD article. +Hi Thanks for your comment. In my opinion the whole series on Scientology is a great example of a failure of the WP process. I will continue to try to improve the articles. I will try to treat everyone with respect and listen to what they have to say. Wishing you well. +position abuse you abuse you position and block people like me wo tell the truth. Shame. +" Here are some sources that call PETA ""extremist"": Fox News (and again), the [ http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_55/ai_n13606711 National Review], a Welsh local paper, and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Those are just the mainstream media outlets and one organization with the same claim to fame as PETA. Of course, we can add www.petakillsanimals.com and www.peta-sucks.com, but that might cause an argument -) " +August 2008 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. +The Hattenhauer article does just that. It also discusses why impossible things (e.g., defying gravity) take place near the end of the story. Unfortunately, the Wik article doesn't mention these things. +"Butthurt sandpeople, please don't censor Jewish articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.140.31 " +Last comment by you Multi has just proved your inablity to think rationally. No doubt you would back up and old crap proposed as a smear. The problem with you is that you're all about taking sides. Learn to be your own person and make edits according to fact and relevance. I barely need to list all the reasons who holocaust denial shouldn't go in that box. But quickly so that you don't waste anymore of your precious editing time trying to argue for it I'll give you 3 reasons. 1) Holocaust denial isn't a political ideology, it's a personal belief, 2) Griffin has no convication for holocaust denial, so you won't find a source anywhere for it. 3) There WAS no source provided anyway. Stop wasting our time with these silly proposals. thanks +Unspecified source for Image:NKMajor.gif Thanks for uploading Image:NKMajor.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk +" Please do not include personal comments in the articles - especially name-calling! If there is something incorrect with the article, you can fix it. If you have a problem with something that you'd like to discuss with other editors, you can use the article's talk page. Thanks! Talk " +could help address many of the issues you pointed out if you tried yourself. +Mexico National football Team Thanks I didnt know how to fix it +I can tell you from going through this storm that the Florida panhandle did not receive more than a trace from this cyclone. Measurable snow did penetrate rather far down into Georgia though. +Interesting fact You're a huge fucking tool, and you suck enormous amounts of cock. Boom, roasted. +" Thanks; I've fixed them both. There remains another problem with Tanjung in that the existing link (Tanjung) in the disambiguation page links to the city of Tanjung on Kalimantan. Both Tanjung on Lombok and Tanjung on Kalimantan are Regency capital cities, a fact clearly unnoticed by whoever put in the link as (Tanjung). Logically the article titled ""Tanjung (city)"" should be for clarity altered to ""Tanjung, Kalimantan"", with the disambiguation link amended accordingly. Can you sort this out? " +Why don't you go screw Why don't you go screw instead of harassing me? +I've just blocked the account as an obvious sock of . (talk • contributions) +Hello. Some of your edits to articles relating to Varian Medical Systems or Varian v. Delfino, among other subjects, have been reverted. Please go to User:Kmccoy/Delfino for more information. Please feel free to discuss this there (or on User_talk:Kmccoy/Delfino. Please stop pushing vanity articles or POV regarding these subjects. Thanks. - (talk) 18:04, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) +Adding the mainland China route to the International Route just makes the table unreadable. The whole pages becomes a mess. The fusing of the two tables only consists in virtually annexating Hong Kong and Macau. Stop doing this. Furthermore as you pointed out above Hong Kong and Macau even have separate Olympic Committees, so don't act like a baby. It seems like this page is constantely under PRC-government attack. +" Be careful with that editor KDesk, I appreciate your perception that the image of a man smoking a joint (which Mjpresson says exemplifies the title of the article Cannabis smoking) is inappropriate. You may wish to follow the controversy further on Talk:Cannabis smoking, on the ""discussion"" page of Wikipedia:WikiProject cannabis, and at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Tokerdesigner banned for one week where User:Tokerdesigner is under consideration for a block because User:Mjpresson proposed the block starting with a false allegation that Tokerdesigner ""threatened"" Mjpresson. At the latter site you may decide to join in and vote to oppose a one-week block against Tokerdesigner especially after going to Mjpresson:Contributions and seeing what that editor has started to do on cannabis-related articles and One-hitter (smoking), seemingly emboldened by the thought that with Tokerdesigner sanctioned, other editors will be intimidated and uneager to try to stop him/her. My conjecture (which I will be so bold as to share with you here) is that Mj's agenda includes: Usaing Wikipedia to promote the interests of the cigarette industry" +Oh, beautiful; it's already covered in the article with a proper secondary source: An analysis of 13 studies of pain treatment with acupuncture, published in January 2009 in the journal BMJ, concluded there was little difference in the effect of real, sham and no acupuncture. +The Fish Directory, my free and creative commons licensed fish catalogue: http://seafishes.wordpress.com +Delete. 14:31, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC) +I do not agree with your undoing of the video the discussion above shows that there is consensus. +Zombie I notice that the word 'zombie' is used in the article when it is never used in the series? wills316 +this edit was posted by the user of this page, you all really think you can make me not edit lol you all are funny as shit. 206.217.197.164 +" i suyppose the concept of ""star-crossed lovers"" is vague to you if you havne't read Shakespeare lately " +The RNW death toll estimate is included in the main article on the quake, and I'd suggest also including it in this article. (talk (talk +Hello Please see the Justin Bieber talk page to discuss the matter. Do not go to my talk page to intimidate me. Be civil. CG +Dictionaries Here are some dictionaries that do not define the word as always offensive: Oxford English Dictionary Online[] '2. A native of China.' Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary[] 'often offensive a native of China CHINESE ' I can find more if needed. I think that these counter-examples can allow the word 'many' to be inserted in front of 'dictionaries' in saying that the word is offensive. +You don't need a WP:MEDRS-quality source to frame a fringe view, but something which show WP:PARITY. Ornish's recent pronouncements have been taken down by piece's such as this. The JAMA article mentioned is a twenty year old primary source, so no good for our purposes. +" Controversy Claims ""Garment workers in Saipan often live and work in fenced-in compounds (some residents also have fenced-in compounds),"" This statement is true but the wording seems convoluted. The first part of the statement is I think trying to imply that the workers are semi-prisoners and the part in parenthesis is defensive? ""and they are often not permitted to leave the fenced-in areas without permission from the manager and without an escort, although against the law and previously prosecuted, to limited effect."" It seems to me that anyone who lives on Saipan (I do) and can see the multitudes of garment workers wandering around wherever and whenever they please knows this statement is not generally true. " +Oh, really, Mr. Berlet, the NLG is vilified for quite legitimate reasons. As for serious scholars (I hope you're not equating serious with only left-wing), I disagree, and as for journalists, they simply are beyond being taken seriously by anything but a small, rapidily aging demographic. While I'm at it, I'm also curious as to how you came to the conclusion that the late Murray Rothbard is a racist? Separate topic, you can reply on my talk page, if you'd like. The Intelligence Report prints such peculiar things. +Edit request from LikeLakers2, 13 October 2011 Null edit to purge cache and to remove the page from the view of Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates. (talk | ) (talk | ) +In an older interview, Ogre described the music of Skinny Puppy as electro-acoustic. He didn't use the term Industrial. There was no Industrial movement in North America. The movement in USA and Canada started with the post-industrial movement in the early 80s. It was a Industrial-Goth-Punk mixture, the same with FLA and Numb. (this is why Rivetheads are northamerican phenomenon). +OriginalResearch Template There is no respected source which suggests that male pregnancy is either possible, or likely. Comments to that effect in this article are nonsense and uncited. +" For an arbitrator your very mature. ★★★★ " +There are many (many) other examples... +I am not sure what you are talking about - that fact was added to the article, and has not been removed at all. I did rewrite a portion of that section, but the fact that the poll was commissioned by a group opposing the abortion ban is still in there. +For additional proof for +Also It is not explained why there is no clear record of his birth date. Is that not worth mentioning in the article's body? 50.59.14.6 +I must admit I don't really care, but I have never seen what you are suggesting to have been necessary for any other such section of other parties. Also, nothing in that specific reference says what the duration of the association was, one must go to the article to find that out.- +hey someone deleted my work, according to him it was irrelevant. what has to be done now? +If I must not add albanian name for citys outside of Albania why are forin names at albanian citys like Korçë and Gjirokastër? +Early history There is no mention of Oswiu's formative years spent in exile at the court of the king of Dal Riada (Argyll), or of his first marriage to Rhieinfellt (Raegnmaeld) a British princess of the line of Urien of Rheged. +}} {{WikiProject Energy| class = Start| importance = Low +since i was blocked, then blackburne reversed it, well than others are majority, even if they are wrong pedos! +" Um thats very mature of you, I didn't mean to come off like an immature jackass but I kind of am one. I get bent because the mental health field is for the most part a load of sh*t. And people suffer and die because of that, everyday. Nobody should be diagnosed with anything until all medical causes are ruled out thats common sense and pure science. People are in ""therapy"" for depression and they actually have Lyme disease or someother medical condition. There are psychoanalysts making a fortune spewing pseudoscientific b.s. and their clients wind up jumping off bridges. That's my motivation, if somebody can get positive information even from ""just a Wikipedia article"" like maybe they don't have anorexia nervosa it's Crohns disease. " +Your work will be deleted or bastardized whether it adheres to the current rules or not, either because those rules will be changed, or through the sheer incompetence of those who come here merely to foul up other editors' contributions. +" Oh, so that's how that page works! I saw it before, but I didn't understand how it worked. Now I do. . Thanks! (T) " +My Wife Let's have a threesome with my wife )User:EngineerScotty +Not enough edits for Angela Unfortunately we never even dove into the consolation prizes. 50,000 edits wow thats impressive someone is a little preoccupied. So fo playing so hard but giving so little you will be given an official barn award the sequel. Sorry but we accept winners not losers try harder to be a winner not a loser. Sorry but red links don't give happiness they take away. +wow great= wow great.. you are a copyright superman.. next nobel prize for copyright is for you! cheers.. +Thank you sir, you just proved your immaturity. +, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Thank you! 18:24 +, 17 November 2009 (UTC) But it is right for differential ECL where the emitter voltage is really fixed, isn't it? 21:36 +- Reference 1 - Explanation in talk page http://www.telugumovienews.info/ +removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV: This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever: There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant. Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! +I want this jerk blocked for vandalism (once again reverting to last good version Beckford's claims that I am not allowed to edit are ridiculous, especially as he is here only to push POV and promote himself and his alleged expert status) This war will go on forever. He is simply a jerk. beckjord +are only made accessible if the content being archived is no longer accessible Just curious: How do you make something accessible that is no longer accessible? +Regarding edits made during December 4 2006 (UTC) to Great Sphinx of Giza Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +Question I have seen portions of the discussion page that I have written get deleted. Not archived, but deleted. Have you threatened removal for those people? I am all for keeping the sanctity of your page, but not at the cost of misinformation. An amicable solution would be preferrable for both of us as I am sure I can use any number of IP addresses. I ask to allow me to respond to why I believe I am not violating the rules, then you archive if you have a consensus. You left messages for me already, leave a message with a consensus of the contributors and I will have no problem with your archival, after being allowed a day to respond to why I am being archive. Further, stop deleting my discussion. Is this a fair resolution? Thanks Anon +" I have actually replaced the contents with the above sockpuppetcheckuser notice, as I think this is more appropriate than just deleting it. ''''''''''/talk|contribs\ " +with $30,000 a month and a free expensive funeral +" ..And how would that AN/I read; ""fellow admin reverts anon page blanking once then creates talk archive""?...Give me a break. And yes, ""unregistered users"" are users, but that's not what i was referring to. Additionaly this comment/threat is way out of line, consider that your [[only warning. " +tell someone that cares. +Afraid I don't know what a furphy is, but one link (http://sti.bmjjournals.com/cgi/repnt/79/1/65.pdf) was a typo as far as I can tell (compare with the corrected South Korea URL: http://sti.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprint/79/1/65.pdf two characters are missing). Either way, the links were wrong. I'll try to remember where I've seen the Mexico data. +" Scottish Crown ""has not been worn since the early 1650's"" then how was Parliment opened the statement under the picture contradicts it self 7/30/05 1:45 PM EST It hasn't been worn since the 1650s. It was present at the opening of the Scottish parliament, however. It was its presence, not its wearing, that was significant in the old Scottish parliament. \(caint) " +What personal attack? You are the one making personal attacks. +" Hey Just to let you know, I responded to your Delete proposal at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Colors (software). " +And go ahead and delete my account, I can't wait for it, I'm sick of having to check every retarded message you people post in my page!... If it gets deleted it gets permanently blanked!... +Gasp, why did you revert the article in Ben 10 about Gayneright, its not Wayernight, and he wasn't using Grey Matter to give to an Organization, it was stolen after he used it as a dildo to try and get attention. +Thats from a speech by LK Advani. Not NPOV at all, and not a reliable source. 05:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) +":: Thanks a lot. We are working to clean the article. Hopefully, a consensus may be arrived at soon. I would suggest a semi protection once the matter is settled.-Office of the secret service " +Thank you for experimenting with the page Glenelg, Scotland on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +" I guess JFD is trying to discourage you to get in touch with me via e-mail, since he fears some kind of academical threat. Just to clear some things up, I was not the guy who went ""India did not exist until 1947"". I would never post something as blunt, offensive, and ignorant as that. However, yes, I have changed a few things around as a correction. It is not to offend anyone, but like Kenneth Tennyson and his devoted sidekick JFD (the Green Hornet and Kato), I too have some historical points of views. I understand that you have been accused of being a pan-Indian nationalist, while I have been accused of being a Tamil nationalist. As far as Indian martial arts are concerned, martial arts from both your culture and mine are in the Indian martial arts section. Therefore, it effects both of us. It seems like through this wiki-conflict, it has thrown us together into one pot. If I am here to put you or your culture down, or to discredit India, why in the first place would I have stuck up for you. I had not intentions in mind when I did that. It just ticked me off when Kenneth sent you that messed up message. Just like, for example, a few years ago, when a Punjabi store owner was beaten up in a hate crime. I was outraged... I see you have a vast knowledge in the fighting styles of Northern Inda, while I have the same for Southern India. Likewise, you are very knowledgeable about ancient Bharat and its 16 Mahajanapada Republics, while I have the same for ancient Tamilakkam. Since this page on Indian Martial Arts effects us both, maybe together we can combine both our knowledge to present a remarkable page. Yes, I do understand our passions which may sometimes clash. However, if we could set aside some of that and work together in a ""give-take"" mentality we can make things work. At the same time, we will present our contributions which may be opposite of what JFD-Kenny think, but at the same time their views shall be presented as well to give a fair and balanced view on Indian Martial Arts. Do you agree with me on this? If so, it would be nice if we could communicate via e-mail. I have more ideas to share with you. I believe we can make this work. As far as JFD is concerned, I do not know what his intentions are. Maybe he feels a little threatened of the possiblity of you and me teaming up on this project? or maybe I am wrong... Indrancroos " +Fair enough, at least you are asking for more input. +No trouble at all; thanks! +" This isn't a deletion discussion, it's a discussion of how the article can be kept. It can be kept with the addition of reliable independent sources- articles or reviews about this book in significant sources. - (talk · contribs) " +" Mitre 10 Mega is designed as a one stop shop for big projects, to compete with other ""Big Box"" hardware stores. dont know why you feel the need to change it to Mega is designed as a one stop shop for big projects, to compete with Bunnings Warehouse.? answer please" +MacKenzie McHale Your edit on MacKenzie McHale has been reverted as unconstructive. The content has been used as a prank recently but this edit was simply out of place and with no context. When the article is expanded it could mention the particular plot event you edited into the stub, but right now there is no reason to add that. +Say I fail again And you're being reported. You think that you are the hot shot that runs everything around here. News flash: you're not untouchable. You're just someone who can abuse power just like everyone else on wikipedia. Young buck can't afford to varify his acount. Does that mean it's illegitimate? NO. VERIFIED PRODUCERS, have tweeted with that acount, hence confirming it's valid. So just shut your mouth, and stop reverting that page or be reported, to hell I care. +" The notion of ""favoring one viewpoint"" over another doesn't seem like a strong argument given that the nature of closing an AFD inherently requires making such a decision. This was handled in a proper manner; it's not a pure vote. One ""vote"" properly citing policy carries more weight than 100 ""votes"" providing no rationale. " +Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, Does it concern you at all that the reasons you gave for removing the clarifications were completely nonsensical? You even removed it at one point claiming it was in a section it was not even in!!! Lets just cut to the chase, you are a Jewish man with an agenda to keep Jewish interests in illegally obtained land, by INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS, away from wikipedia pages and the masses as a whole. Right? Regardless, at least be accurate if you are going to start attacking someone for selfish reasons so you do not look like an idiot next time with anyone that takes two seconds to look into this. AND PLEASE, COMMUNICATE WITH ME DIRECTLY NEXT TIME BEFORE BEING OUTWARDLY HOSTILE AS MY DOOR IS ALWAYS OPEN. Thanks! And have a good day! +HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM I know this ain't no forum but who cares if its a forum or not. Any way Oi've been thinking, when the game is released, ZTvolcano moight use the extinct animals for their user made creatures. +" Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Choadman, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. — ro » " +So why do you show such great intrest in the continuation war article? And with this intresst why do delet the sentence about the Soviet air attacks that started the war? What is controversial about that? I feel that your deleting is very controverisel on the subject. +"create an account]] and log in 'Due to persistent vandalism (), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. Or you may use the form here. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|" +Thanks Keilana for your valuable feedback, I worked on rephrasing the history section. I hope it is fine this time. +" When you say ""sorcery"", does it really mean ""Magic Tricks""? 202.156.9.3 " +REDIRECT Talk:Ezra Pound's Three Kinds of Poetry +I can't believe you fucking wikipedos. I'm going to be the first person in history to be murdered by pipe swinging niggers because retarded aspergers' infected wikipedos wouldn't stop sucking willy on wheels' dick long enough to delete the fucking pages I tell them to. +There was also no warning of getting blocked. +did a revert on annual-reviews inc, added link on its standards-of-operation page. Non-profit means bound to economic restrictions at 94% costs and 80% tax, not expressing pure altruism... not serving the demands of the public... Its just something among the spectrum of E.K., AG, KG, GmbH, gGmbH, e.V., Individual in german terminology, indeed nothing worth-mention at all... Less tax, less management freedom. One should say, the category is intrinsically misleading, and I fell into the trap. +someting random MMMMMMM yes........ +@ You Know What Fine!! FUCK YOU!!!! I hope you and and that smart ass and douchbag burn in hell!! Because I was just having some fun and trying to be right for once by having some connection. Weird Al is right! Wikipedia does suck!!! +Removal of pages from Internet Archive Before contemplating the removal of sources from the Internet Archive (notably the appeal defence pdf), it should be considered that the only person authorised to remove pages from the Internet archive is the site owner who, according to the whois record, is Iris Baker Removing the appeal defence pdf pages from J4NB proves that members of the support group are involved in a cover-up. If the same pages are removed from the Internet archive it will provide clear evidence of Iris Baker's involvement. +REDIRECT Talk:List of selected contemporary repertoire for guitar +Proposed deletion of Disappearance of Megan Stammers ++permablock I have blocked this account permanently for very intentional (announced, even) vandalism to the project. +" I give up, what does ""non-RS"" mean? 16 September 2013 (diff | hist) . . Uplift Universe‎; 16:24 . . (-114)‎ . . ‎Nikkimaria (talk | contribs)‎ (rm non-RS) " +Islam and anti-Semitism Excellent work! We must stamp out this Yehudi bias! +Sam Songo Living Hello. I noticed that you categorized Sam Songo as a living person. I haven't been able to find out much about him after his initial burst of popularity when the Mission School works were in vogue in the 1950's and early 60's. Needless to say, the records for that part of Africa aren't exactly great. Do you have any sources to verify that Mr. Songo is indeed alive? Thanks!! +" Technically all articles should remain. Ell & Nikki are actually solo artists, and where only forged together as a duo for the sake of Eurovision. ☀Mouse " +I will never stop removing personal attacks and trolling like that of Bormalagurski from my talk page. Once you have apologized for vandalizing my user talk page and promised never to do so again, I will stop watching you. ( ) +Graphics Cards Overheating So apparently Blizzard has acknowledged that there is a problem with the way that certain portions of the game are rendered and this has been causing some graphics cards to overheat. This should be fixed in an upcoming patch so I'm not sure if it deserves mention in the article. But I wanted to put it out there for discussion. Here are some relevant links: http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/223306,how-to-dust-away-starcraft-2-overheating-issues.aspx http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2010/07/28/blizzard-confirms-starcraft-ii-overheating-bug.aspx http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=258215 +" Fair use rationale for Image:The Second Arrival, DVD Cover.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Second Arrival, DVD Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +Because Wikipedia is for a general audience and utterly obscure details shouldn't be here. Having their own wiki allows more freedom. (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) +It's not a given that the moment someone starts playing tennis they lose their national identity. +Text Removal by Originating Author As the originating author, I have exercised my prerogative and removed my text from the site. The original article had been distorted so that it no longer reflected any insight into the properties of dumb networks and other network technologies +Sample question does anyone know where the war sample at the start of Take It Back is from? +" Wiki-""Facts"" are what is reported in the various media. You know that. Stop pretending otherwise. talk " +" Blocking Mardyks (2012) Excellent work there Shii. We can't have his kind getting us to think about what the Maya actually say about their own prophecies. We insulted him, offended him and abused him and he just had to be ethical and persistant. BLOCK those Mother Fukkers!!! Taking out the entire Santa Fe Public Library system is a great preemptive strike also. There may be others of his kind, that sympathize with those ""Indians"". These people actually LOVE the Earth and that is without reliable sources! We kicked their asses and have the right to write THEIR history and interpret THEIR sacred teachings however we please. We need more from college students who have been indoctrinated in the Church of Academia. That piece by Stitler is one of the most exaggerated and opinionated and so yeah, use that as the title of the page! And by all means give John MAJOR Jenkins his own section. Not a single scholar or Mayanist agrees with his appropriated theory and this kind of hypocrisy and arrogance is what Wiki is all about. We can get away with it, by continuing to use our power to censor free thinkers like Mardyks and his kind. Sony Pictures is paying us all off with tickets, so let us know how many you want. FREE popcorn, too! Whoopee! Best wishes from Jimini Cricket 97.123.26.228 " +I think that's not quite the way it works, nor the way it should work either.. Article content is for editors, with dispute resolution by the community when they can't agree. Acceptability of articles for considerations of notability or otherwise is for the community. such questions are properly raised on the article talk page first in many cases, in the hope that the editors can improve the content enough to satisfy those who may question the article. Sometimes they choose to resolve it via a merge, often a good compromise. If they can agree on that, it's an editing decision. If not, it goes to the community, via Afd and deletion review. I can't see giving any group of editors a decisive voice in whether their content gets kept or not, no matter how many might agree. '''''' +needs categories Like the header says, this article needs categories. I'd add them, but I'm not sure which ones would be appropriate.Talk +" Request Hi, I would to make use of your copyediting services for the A Weekend in the City FAC. I'd appreciate the help especially as one user wants a third party look at the prose. Thanks. " +FYI, Category:Kurdish inhabited region has been moved to Category:Kurdish inhabited regions +accept = We are sincerely sorry for your experience. +" I too have given numerous reasons and now the ball is in your court to respond (at the second-last section started by Legalese). The kind of civility given will be the kind that will be given back; if you feel squeamish on my username and contribs, I too will assume genders after all we're all anonymous aren't we ? There is no need of ""knowing"" anyone personally here. That's not required for discussion. I've had hundreds of discussions with hundreds of people here and I've known about only 2 (and that too when they chose to tell). " +Wikipedia:How to write a great article Wikipedia:The perfect article +sorry, forgot to sign this +" Oh, and content disputes aren't vandalism. Changing ""Aerith"" to ""butt"" can be reverted indefinitely. ""Aerith"" to ""Aeris,"" that could reasonably be a good-faith dispute. - (conspire | past ops) " +No worries at all, it was a pleasure. I wouldn't say it wasn't ready, I do tend toward the tougher end of GAR. I also know a fair amount about this topic, making for more detailed scrutiny on content than a soldier like me can provide on a ship, for example. And it is a BIG topic for an article. It really is a very good article now, and I hope to see it at ACR soon. Regards, (crack... thump) +"All I wanted to add to his page were his claims about Alcohol which he has used in his past . This is my post that was censored. Choudary has said that anyone becoming intoxicated by alcohol should be given 40 lashes in public. He claimed alcohol was ""the root of all evil” and that ""Islam additionally imposes 40 lashes in public for deliberate intoxication, followed by 80 lashes in public if repeated for a second time.”." +Football Hello Drury, I have seen you are very keen on AFC Asian Football. I would like to invite you on another project, in which I would really like to have you in, to help with the AFC Champions League 2012 thread (apart from everything else you want, we follow every single event and we are focused on all Olyympic disciplines). The project is still pretty young and we need some help at least with the AFC Champions League 2012 thread to have updated results and standings. You don't need much time to take part and I would give you all the help you need in the first period. Would you like to have more informations about that ? Thank you very much! Fabio (Lupo) +Please state that you deny that you are indeed not a sockpuppet of +" Comment by Mattchewbaca – I would just like to commend you THR, for putting forth the time and effort to put this problem into perspective. Hopefully, with the great investigative work you have demonstrated here, this will send a message to these editors that their GA reviewing buddy circle is not to be taken seriously. Beyond the reciprocity of this group and their articles is the depreciated level of their reviewing knowledge. Some in this group, with or without realizing it, are responsible for the current diminished state of GA class articles. While I can't speak for each and every one of these editors, I have had personal experience with a few of them, two of which are , and . The article Halfway Gone, which was nominated by and reviewed by , in September 2010, was selected by myself to undergo WP:GAR. As you can see, the article clearly does not meet the WP:GA requirements. Many of the refs are duplicates of one another, including: Refs 19 and 35, 20 and 37, 21 and 33, 22 and 34, 23 and 40. There is the use of both Nielsen Business Media and Prometheus Global Media for the Billboard references. There are refs that do not support actual claims. Two-thirds of the Live performances section is factually inaccurate, seeing as though they are not live performances but instead taped and aired later that evening. My attempt at a successful de-listing of the article was met with resistance and consequently it still remains as a GA. reviewed Howling Bells (album), an article which I nominated for GA. He quick-failed the article within 57 minutes of creating the review page. His review baffled me, it seemed as though he did not have the knowledge required to actually be reviewing an article because the majority of his claims, as far as faults in the article went, were unfounded, they simply were not true. The other points in the article he claimed as weaknesses easily could have fixed within ten minutes. Fighting Temptation is another article that quick-failed the day after my GA nominated article was failed by him. He proceeded to pass this article after he and the nominator came to an agreement to where he would allot a certain amount of time to the nominator to make corrections based on his GA review. David Lucas (composer) is another GA nominated article that he has had quick-failed just this week. After the nominator of that article reached out to him on his talk page stating that she could have fixed all of the issues addressed in a timely manner, he agreed to give put the nomination on hold and allow her time to make the changes. Within 48 minutes of leaving the message on his talk page, the nominator had made all the changes to the article brought up by him, and now he has passed the article that he initially quick-failed. In the past, was warned here to stop reviewing articles and had a thread started about him and his bad GA reviewing. In closing, I would like to say that getting any of the articles that I work on to GA status no longer is a concern to me. These editors have flooded the market with their paltry articles and now GA is not a true representation. I find it amusing that these editors still nominate their articles for GA as if it's a noteworthy achievement... it makes me ponder. They seem to not realize that their GA articles are in the same league with a C-class article masquerading as a GA. Even though my comments were a bit off topic, I would again like to express gratitude to you THR, for casting light upon this matter which needs to be properly addressed at an administrative level. This act of back scratching amongst these editors as well as their abominable reviewing standards has to cease if GA status is to exemplify what it truly stands for. (meow) " +No, I was just confessing on my reasons. Now that I do know, why would I do it again? I don't want to stop editing here. I had thought that if I was somewhere else, I wouldn't. So since I did, I wouldn't do it again. Sorry if this was disturbing, was just being honest. I don't want to come back being like yea I did it, but not state why I did so. Secondly, it would be considerably easy to know if I was to sock. I only edit Selena and Bad Girls Club articles. I swear I wouldn't do it again, I'm up for anything that can prove what I am saying is true and not just a cry to come back and once everything is fine that I'll do it again. Thanks, +Unethical actions by an admin named The context of the supposed WP:NPA violation is highly relevant. My comment was made in response to an ideologically-motived 3RR violation report filed against me. Since that wasn't working for him, Nandesuka figured I needed to be silenced, which is why he dug through the history and found this excuse after the fact. Note that Nandesuka shouldn't even be involved in this in any official capacity, since he's an admin who has had many content disputes with me over his unalloyed support for cirumcising all penises. As a member of the Snippies, he is too biased to participate in this case, and his actions show that he's a sore loser who is abusing his newly-gained admin rights to silence me so that I can't defend myself from the charges of 3RR violation. I request that this block be removed so that I can correct false statements being made in my 3RR report and clear my good name. Thank you for your prompt response +DISCUSSION PAGE FOR SALLY ANNE GOLDEN +Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2015 please permit me to add Gautam Gulati's pic image= +Pig Fenian Nice wrist action boys, keep it up. +:Jesse Hedman Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create such pages will be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Thank you. +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Ryeowook, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Manwaymy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! way " +" Agreed, but the starting point needs to be what the reliable secondary sources include; not ""I think it is important/interesting so let's add this information"" found by consulting primary sources or what have you, ignoring WP:UNDUE. If you don't start from reliable secondary sources, then you really end up with unwieldy articles. " +" 2007 (UTC) You may find this interesting [`http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/564867?src=rss] Sleep deprivation and emotional instability ""This is the first set of experiments that demonstrate that even healthy people's brains mimic certain pathological psychiatric patterns when deprived of sleep."" How is this for attitude on CFS, as if there were not enough problems? Seasons Regards 03:06, 23 December" +Emergency Hi there. I know you have shown an interest in the debate as to whether Emergency should be an article or a dab page. I have now created an article which I believe would be suitable for the 'Emergency' page, with everything else to be moved out to a separate disambiguation page. My suggested article is (in my name space), and the debate as to whether this will be suitable is on the Talk:emergency page. I would appreciate you input! +LOOK: User Theresa Knott hates: +" I'm the one that put that stuff about them using locations around town and saying they're something else. The ""Training Facility is my High School, Muncie Central. I know this because I've been in out wrestling room and the entrance the showed is the door I go in every day. - " +The first one is definitely incorrect; it was indeed Pskov and Mogilev Governorates, not Yekaterinoslav. I haven't checked the other one yet.— • (yo?); July 23, 2013; 19:54 (UTC) +" Copyright problem removed One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. (talk) " +Seriously Stop being a wannabe moderator. +In addition to what you may find, here is what I have compiled since yesterday: MTV , Interscope , and the New York Post . People need to remember that there is more than one version. There is a re-release of The Fame with the extra songs (tho that might change according to NY Post) and there is also the separate disc release. Sure there will be sources for the re-release because there are plans for that in addition to the single disc release of the new album. Those re-release sources do not cast aside the sources about the separate album because they aren't talking about the album, they are talking about the re-release. +FINE. I REWROTE IT. HAPPY NOW? +Complaints/Mistakes +" Speedy deletion of Desiyou A tag has been placed on Desiyou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +. I would also like to note that this block has prevented me from both participating in the AFD for this article and from adding the information to the article that the blocking admin demands. It seems like exceedingly poor form to delete an article, refuse to engage in discussion with the person who created it, and then block them +Strong Support, to spite the faggot known as TJ Spyke. Go and ahead and whine, fag. I won't read this page any further. I will also just ignore the new messages alert. Fuck Wikipedia. Bunch of self-important faggots who feel powerful by editing a web site. Go wank to hentai. +" A cheeseburger for you! Splosh! " +" I don't know that you should be reverting someone ""in consequence"". You take issue with the Trevor Horn statement as ""self-published"", yet cite your position with Woolley's Wikipedia entry, which is not permissable. " +Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. // talk 21:31, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) +Is there evidence of King's defense beyond the mother's word? However non-credible Breitbart may be in this instance we weigh their reputation against that of a self-proclaimed adulterous whore. Surely that goes to credibility. 169.57.0.200 +" Lol...good day then. — (Tαlκ) 19:30, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)" +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Frank Lucas (drug lord). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. · Hail! " +dude y r u such a fukin nerd wit no life????? +Well, I've decided to add myself. – +" (outdent) ""In this sense, we might as well link every noun and adjective, because they all have some tangential relationship to the subject."" No, that's not an accurate comparison at all. Links to those would only reveal information about the English language. Context: if you reach 1170 from Strongbow, you find out that while the Normans were invading Dublin, Madoc of Wales, just across the Irish Sea, was allegedly discovering America. That's local context. Expand to regional context and you get the Danes attacking Estonia. Expand to global context and you find Fes becoming the biggest city in the world. Other, more detailed year articles (1345, anyone?) will tell you about everything that was going on everywhere. Events are islands. History is a sea. Let our readers sail freely. [t/c] " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Thatcher131 +Harriet Beecher Stowe Hi Midnightdreary, thank you for the kind note left here . If I've been churlish with the editor, it's because they've apparently used at least three accounts on this and other articles to add unsourced content. Surely they're working in good faith, but there's never been a reference provided, nor an attempt to engage or explain their edits. So much for background. Very best, +Use , and fill out the fields.. Thanks for adding the source... would also be useful to have the date and catalogue numbers if possible ) +"PalaceGuard asks ""is it up to us to decide whether ""China"" is or is not one of these (culture, civlization, nation) [not state])?"" We have to describe ""China"", so we do have to decide for each of those meanings whether there is a China. We do have to decide whether there is a Chinese culture to describe. We do have to decide whether there is a Chinese civilization to describe. We do have to decide whether there is a Chinese nation (or perhaps 2) to describe. And if all of these exist, and we discover that despite overlaps there are significant distinctions between them, we have to decide whether to try to jam them all into one article - a nearly impossible task as we've seen - or to put them in multiple articles. And if we put them in multiple articles, we have to decide if one can be said to be the most common usage, and thus the page first reached for ""China"", or whether more than one are equally primary and thus, like America and Britain, the first page for ""China"" should be a disambiguation page. As an American, the primary meaning of ""America"" is clear to me. But I have to face the reality that plenty of people around the world think differently, and some are even offended when we Americans call ourselves ""Americans"". Those who think ""China"" always means one thing to all people need to face the reality that many reasonable people around the world seen clear distinctions between Chinese culture, Chinese civilization, and the political entities that use ""China"" in their names. There is nothing to be ashamed of in those distinctions. It points out the success of China as a civilization and culture. Smaller countries, cultures, and civilizations generally don't have these distinctions because they didn't control other territories, didn't have their culture adopted by others, and didn't spread civilization. " +"! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Talk • Contribs • Spread the love! |} {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists |- ! +I am not consistent about where I reply. Sometimes I reply here, sometimes on your talk page. If you have a preference, let me know. Otherwise, I recommend putting this page on your watchlist if you are looking for a reply. Butting in about penguins, platypuses, or other creatures/concepts is generally OK with me too. Don't forget to sign your post with four tildes: ~~~~. +" That fellow Editor uses few aliases like rpo.castro when he dislikes others contributuons. Also uses confusion by inducing ""changing of tournament sceme"" every once in a while ... very often. And thas all he contributes. After he see he's nazi fires and deletions are wrong he uses parts of it in his ""later editions"". Funny editor ... But hey he's good for wikis profit isnt it if you resell content." +Call for more investigation of an SPI you closed I'd like to see here a request a technical/CheckUser check. While the data is fresh, a)I think the unconfirmed socks should be confirmed (or refuted); as someone who was nearly blocked indefinitely, I'd think you'd be OK with this, but I don't want to step on your close, especially as I'm just off a block myself. It would be valuable to b)look for the real puppetmaster, as the nominal puppetmaster has only made a few edits, and that the investigation should c)expand to this edit - removal of same Iranian Jew population information and source by another editor - though I continue to AGF, we've only got a nominal puppetmaster and this is a lead that could be followed up on. May I make it so or can you? It says anyone can request a technical/CheckUser check, so I'm starting here, since you just closed the SPI. (t•c) +"==Ass Ripper Express== I read in the newspaper about a number of young girls being anally raped in toilets of these trains. All the rapes occured on the Pendolino trains and no other WCML service, this led to speculation that the trains were somehow ""rapist friendly"". I think that this should be incorporated into the article. 217.72.91.120 " +" This is my last reply if you continue to present yourself in this manner. Please write more civilly. I expect people to go to Oyster Bay just as I expect them to go to Barre, Vermont. When you type that, do you expect a disambiguation page or do you except the city? Admittedly, it's not the most convenient, but that's the way it is in all eight ""town"" states. Are you going to try to change every single community with this sort of disambiguation? If so, go ahead — but unless you so desire, don't try to have one or two changed. You speak of errors that result (for example, the Oyster Bay disambiguation page) — I do my best to fix wrong links as a result of changes such as this, but I don't see why I must be held responsible for every single wrong link. If you never make mistakes, that's good; but I suspect that you so do. So what? It doesn't matter if you make a good-faith error, especially if you try to fix it once you realise that something's wrong. By the way, if you put ""Oyster Bay, New York"" into the Census Bureau's Factfinder, you'll get this page: it's the town. Barre, Vermont is similar to what we'd call a disambiguation page; the city is listed as Barre city, Vermont. This, I expect, is the reason that these articles are named this way: the Census is our source for the names and the basic information, and therefore we entitle our articles likewise by this reliable source. " +moleman is so cool he the best character for miles coz for one hes funny and a other some people young and old actully live like that they are no ones friend and have promblems with how they look i think we can all learn off of hans moleman but i still thinks he funny!!..!! c ya simpsons fans xbix brogan x +Tamsin: Question? How is it possible for Lineker to have been born in November 1960 and have been a medical student BEFORE joining Leicester City in 1976? He would have been only 15 at the start of the 1976-7 academic year!!! +sorry i want to get outside people to delete discussion nonpartisan how do i do it thanks +"==Vandalism== talk to me " +do i look like i give a fuck, u are all sad fucks with nothing better to do ban me, i dont give a shit +user:Gwernol Is Gay, They Blocked Me +August 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  | T@lk +epic fail I sucked cambridge's ballz all night. Have a good day.68.248.74.14 +Are you Rex071404 or not? +, 22 April 2007 (UTC) Second-hander. 21:45 +" ""Citation needed"" I'm not sure why the citation is requested in the next to the last paragraph, but here is one for anyone who cares to enter it properly: Valentine, Paul W. (Washington Post Staff Writer). ""7,000 Arrested in Disruptions,"" The Washington Post, Times Herald (1959-1973), May 4, 1971; ProQuest Historical Newspapers The Washington Post (1877-1990), page A1. ""Busloads of prisoners were shuttled to jails, including an emergency outdoor detention center haastily set up at a Washington Redskins practice field near RFK stadium. Later, 2,481 of them were transferred to the Washington Coliseum. ""At 11:oçlock last night, Chief Judge Harold H. Greene of D.C. Superior Court ordered police and National Guard authorities to justify the mass arrests of demonstrators without listing names or details of where, when and how they committed their alleged offenses."" Notice that this article falls into the collection mentioned in the References: The Washington Post, various news articles, May 1-7, 1971. I'm sure a law student in DC could find the reference within the records of the various courts that handled the 7,000 detainees [""7,000 Arrested In Disruptions"" By Paul W. Valentine, Washington Post Staff Writer; The Washington Post, Times Herald (1959-1973); May 4, 1971; A1]. More important to me, the last sentence in the article has no citation. Yes, that's the way i remember it. I also recall that the compensation was not ordered until sometime in the 1980s. I don't think ALL of the arrests were declared unconstitutional, but memory is a tricky thing. filé gumbo" +Antisocial Personality Disorder C - cannot follow law O - obligations ignored R - remorseless R - recklessness U - underhandedness P - planning deficit T - temper +REDIRECT Talk:Peter Whelan (priest) +" As others have said, this is no longer an uncontroversial matter; in fact, such a move would be extremely contentious at this point, especially considering that I have been involved in the OOK project for over a year now. I really think we need a community wide discussion to determine where consensus exists if at all. I'm afraid I'm going to have to decline to take action here, though I will watchlist that page to keep an eye on it. –'''''' | Talk " +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Speak your mind " +stub thanks for the suggestion but im dyslexic and looking thru those things are really hard for him to do and i get lost, sowwy =) but if im writing a bunch ofa certain type of article and havnt figured out the particular stud type just tell me and that'll be helbful, cheers! +UK railway stations - W Hello Billion. Kudos for your many edits & images over the past few days. I hope you won't mind, but I've reverted your edit on the UK railway stations - W page. Links in the first column of the table are (so far) all to articles about the specified railway station, not the town to which it is attached. I'd encourage you to write even the stubbiest article about the railway station, and, perchance, take a photo of it sometime? best wishes +Blocked? Funny, I don't feel blocked. Seems I can edit anything I want. Thanks, FP. I think you have made things much simpler. Truly, I didn't expect this. I like surprises. I hope you do too. +what the motherhell are you talking about? i deleted the lacrosse lie? you son need to get your facts straight i do not stand for this bullshit pigshit and treason.. no taxation without motherfucking representation son! Broad +ALSO the point that Birmingham has generally been considered the second city is not backed up. A book, written by somebody in Stroud which is not very far from Birmingham, is not very good evidence for this claim so perhaps we should all start to change this daily? +Image source problem with Image:Toxic dvd.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Toxic dvd.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (talk•contribs) +for example i'm from Central italy(Marche) and i have light brown hair and blue-green eyes , i'm white or black? +" OK thanks. I looked at the first red link in the template, and see that it is a deleted article, so I can see how that would be helpful. That said, this may be a bit of a special case, given how much has been deleted and rev-deled. I hope this won't dissuade you form working on another CCI. In fact, I indirectly referred to you in this thread. If several of us are working together, it might be fun, and there will be some admins to help with deleted material.(Talk) " +User messages. I guess you missed the part where I said I have ZERO interest in what you or anyone else has to say. Yet you left a message anyway. Also, I'm mortally allergic to cats. Piss off. +Stay away Please do not write on my user talk page any more. I find your pederast life style very upsetting and disgusting. Writing on my talk page about it causes me to vomit. +User:Jonathanmbaez Only vandalize the Wikipedia Page once and it was by mistake....He is new to this place and when he saw the great vandalism in the History Section of the Dominican Republic he couldnt do nothing but delete the whole section...he found it so offensive that he was forced to delete it thinking that it was the right thing to do!..I'm his cousin and i told him not to do that again!...they gave him a warning but then he learned not to do that and he didnt do it again...so could you please unblock it? +I recommended to the that they refrain from editing while the other two are blocked to precisely avoid this impression. I've also recommended to Joseph Prasad that they start a discussion thread on the article talk page after the expiration of the other two blocks. Requesting preemptive page protection on the assumption that they will take advantage of the block is an assumption of bad faith and the request should be rejected. +" abuse comes from you. You not only remove talk comments from other people, POV tags, but push your bias under auspices of your admin status in articles where you have conflict of interest. Bullying, using false pretenses and pushing anonimous users from Serbia away. THAT is great amount of abuse, and apparently is your manner, your behavior and ""intimidating"" attitude is neat example of worst kind of power abuse. 213.198.221.171 " +I am assuming that there is no point trying to explain to you mr bracket bot that I have no idea what that means. I copied and pasted and it seems to display if i remove stuff it may not display and since i have no idea why you would need brackets anyway I don't think its wise to remove but I'd be more than happy for you to take care of redundant brackets and may i say you are far too polite to be a human so in other worlds where you gain sentience i add may you and all sentient beings be happy and discover the causes of happiness and feel free to remove brackets if you can do so without harm. +203.217.8.30 I have extended the block to 1 week. Has s/he been attempting to change your password too? +. He called me a weirdo before I said anything bad +what are you talking about what are you talking about +" Good! worked. to bypass the cache in my browser. ) Mid (contributions) " +HiDrNick Present for you fatty. Relax. don't get too excited, it's not a 5000 Rhino meal. [] [] +" Photo of Crown Mines Ltd 4-8-2T No 4 Photo old ""Lost Johannesburg""" +" Cooldown blocks are discouraged, aren't they? talkcontribs " +" I must say I laughed when I saw that some restaurant in obscure upstate New York was the featured article of the day, no matter how good their calamari is. The building is notable for its historic use not its current use. I'm not active in featured article discussions so it is what it is. But if I'm the owner of La Stazione I'm happy today.'''''' • hasspoken " +" Certainly. Yes change to the research section wording occured back in 2011 and was not make by you. (talk · contribs · email) " +" Your revert - IRC nick parameters Hi, thanks for your comments when reverting me here, but I'm not sure if you understand the confusion experienced as a helper on that IRC channel. While I do see you in -helpers from time to time, these days I rarely see you in -help itself, so it's hard to grasp where your reasoning stems from. I do welcome your explanations. I'm confused about the supposed benefit of using WPhelp### over Guest###. In any given day, I see tens, if not over a hundred, instances of the WPhelp nick. The conversation often ends up something like this: WPhelp98392 asks, ""Can you help me with my draft?"" The helper says, ""WPhelp89643: Do you understand conflict of interest?"" Then WPhelp98392 says, ""Sorry what?"" And the the helper must explain with !public. Sometimes the helpee will say ""I really have to look at the numbers to see who is who."" On the contrary, I see few Guest### nicks, and while they are confusing, they are definitely not as widespread as the instances of WPhelp. These users came from the template which does not supply a nick parameter. It takes a long time to manually squint to look for each WPhelp's number if not using autocomplete, and when using autocomplete, you really do run the risk of autocompleting the wrong nick. If you remove the nick parameter, just like the way it is in current freenode webchat, then helpees would ideally choose their own username as the nickname field, eliminating the amount of asking, ""What is your username?"" In short, it would be easier to deal with Guest### nicknames (the few that we'd have) than the piles of confusing WPhelp usernames when everyone literally has almost the same nickname and nobody knows what's going on, with the added benefit of perhaps helpees supplying their usernames. IRC is already a confusing environment for newbies - better to make it less confusing if possible. —  oh hello! " +This article is worthless without pics +Question Hello i'm itiot from Poland, bye ) +" Scandum, the Newsweek article makes the link between the flynn effect and creativity. I'm just basing my info off of the article, assuming someone in the know wrote the article. (see link below) ""Like intelligence tests, Torrance’s test—a 90-minute series of discrete tasks, administered by a psychologist—has been taken by millions worldwide in 50 languages. Yet there is one crucial difference between IQ and CQ scores. With intelligence, there is a phenomenon called the Flynn effect—each generation, scores go up about 10 points. Enriched environments are making kids smarter. With creativity, a reverse trend has just been identified and is being reported for the first time here: American creativity scores are falling.""http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/10/the-creativity-crisis.html " +Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing material in articles will normally be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing here. Thanks. +Wait, now let me see if I understand this. You allow your administrators to be extremely rude, but when someone gets pissed off and tells them off, it's suddenly not okay? Well, guess what. I'm not about to follow your little policies on rudeness if you don't hold your staff to the same standards. +The victims of the brutal assult were between 11 and 14 (tops). That counts as children. If you had sex with a 14-year-old in the United States or Britian and got caught, you would be charged with child rape. 'Nuff said. Wikipedia is about truthful reporting. What conclusions people draw from the video is up to them. But to hide the video on a talk page when it is a historical document of great significance just because you know that 99% of the people don't view the talk page is nothing less than BLATANT CENSORSHIP!!! Are you so ashamed of the British and American militaries and their war crimes in Iraq that you feel it necessary to do whatever it takes so that the general masses don't see this video? Would you also tear down any photos or videos of the holocaust so that people wouldn't know about it? Society must confront evil if it is to ever defeat evil. You are doing a deservice to everyone who has died for the sake of freedom, and that is disgusting. +I'm having difficulty following your reasoning in this, and with all due respect I think you are making the subject murkier and more complicated than it is. I don't have infinite time and patience to debate the same points over and over again. I think the Naked short-selling FAQ , from an organization you acknowledge as authoritative, should be read at the source by persons wishing to learn about this subject prior to weighing in. +This page needs massive editing The initial section, before we hit the menu of options, is fairly good; it gives a complete plot summary of what we've seen of Inu no Taisho in the manga and anime up to the current point. Everything after that, though, is absolutely horrendous. Not only is it replete with bad grammar, but it is full of unwarranted and incredibly long bits of speculation, particularly the badly spelled character analysis. I've deleted the entire set of menu sections that basically retold the movie, along with the 'character analysis.' For now, I've kept the description page done by the same person who did the above, but it also needs massive editing. I'll probably come back and do it later. +WFB Hey Hunter!! YOUR website is unbeilevable, I love it!!! Whens our next meeting? We should meet this week and then plan on looking for it next weekend. Did you guys get anything done at the libray? I highly dought it!!! ) Well ill talk to later. Oh by the way i saw you selling snow cones sorry i didnt stop!! +Lincoln College, Oxford According to Lincoln College, Oxford, Richthofen was a distinguished alumnus of the College. The article doesn't mention when he was at Oxford. Does anyone know? 19:55, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC) +heatsketch, 8:56 September 15, 2007 +Justin Bieber's origin Born in Canada, but current resident of Atlanta, Georgia. For those of you who aren't familiar with ATL, it is a state among the United States. Justin Bieber was born in Canada, but resides in America, thus making him Canadian-American +Fuck you PENIS PENIS PENIS JACKO WACKO JACKO WACKO JACKO WACKO +Anyways, wheres LittleLuckyLinks page? - User:RobertLeBlais +" Suggesion for a more compact grid I'd like to propose a new grid format for the income inequality list. I've uploaded a screenshot here. By combining the UN/CIA ""R/P 10%"" columns and the World Bank/CIA/GPI ""Gini index"" columns, and by writing the years directly besides the values, we can make this grid much more readable. Of course, one could not sort by year anymore, but I don't think this is such an issue. Whichever source (UN, CIA, WB, GPI) has the latest value, that source's data should be displayed. I don't see a need for displaying different sources, since they probably all calculate those indices using the same data. I'll leave some time for people to comment on my proposal, and if no one minds, I'll go ahead and implement it. " +Oh sorry you are just a crazy luntatic fan then, my mistake. Glad you left it up and decided to stop being a baby aout the whole thing. Oh and I am not Shocker Toys but do live in Niagara Falls, you must be good with IPs. +OK, I have just put another edit on the article page to clean up other stuff u dont have right plus added some re Charles Sturt in 1838. It didnt save. I wont edit this again or add more. I havent put the linking stuff up yet or even got to a third of it and no one will find it. You cooked your own goose with your immature nonsense so wik can go without. +Copyvio? Most of the text seems to have come from here. This is a shocking state for one of our core articles. User:Veesicle +"::::: mikemikev, that's just not correct. 'genetic regression' is the statistical idea of regression towards the mean applied to genetics (considered as a random phenomenon). the reason why siblings' scores are closer to the mean (according to Jensen) is that when taking a random sampling of genes from the same pair of parents, the second draw (e.g. second child) will on average be less extreme than the first child (given a list of assumptions too long to mention at this point). Ludwigs2 " +"== Merge Discussion == They are the same concept; I say Merge 'em. Also, I'm not sure that ""theocon(servative)"" can reasonably be described as an epithet (although it certainly is often used as such). Only a communist would say a thing like that! " +" Sockpuppetry case You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wilhelmina Will for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. " +You are right: I have been incivil. Although I do not agree with the policy saying that we shouldn't be incivil, I don't think that the policy is so harmful that I should not follow it. I can do my work on Wikipedia without being incivil. I can try to change the policy without being incivil. Good job, Sean William. I think blocks are such a good tool for dealing with problems that I suggested that every one should be able to block other people. I just think that it is wrong for people to be able to unblock themselves, as it destroys the whole purpose of blocking. +: Im sorry didn't they talk shit to me first? Am I not allowed to defend myself? DId you tell them the same thing you told me then? Or are you coming after me and not them? 71.105.87.54 +" trekbbs Thank you for your opinions in the TrekBBS AFD. I do not agree with the closing admin's decision and have listed this now under Deletion Review. As you had participated in the AFD, I wished to inform you this in case you wished to voice your opinion on this (view my history)/(How am I doing?) " +Aurorion, you have not attempted to constructively contribute to the discussion and instead inserted vague statements in the lead section of the article. I have reverted you. Please be advised that there are multiple editors who have actively participated in talk page discussions in the past. So it's best if you stick to building consensus rather than introducing unilateral edits into the article. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} +I assure you I am not assuming anything, if you created any pic yourself then that is easy, you would be the copyright owner and could release them into the public domain. +{unblock|reason=All my edits were legitimate and are not sock puppetry. }} +Whether or not you'd like to admit it, 'adherents' of the 'Redemption Movement' encompass people from all walks of life, and all sorts of different ethnic and social backgrounds. While it may or may not be true that the 'Redemption Movement' was started by supposed supporters/members of the Posse Comitatus movement, this is not grounds for removal of any of the article's text. Whether or not you'd like to admit it, there are many people out there using these 'theories' to successfully gain control over their personal financial situations over the fraudulent U.S. government's legislation (See HJR 192, and really ponder it for a moment, if you can find the time and mental capacity). I myself do not promote hate and violence, law breaking, or tax-evasion. I feel that the NPOV is essential to the reader's ability to draw a conclusion about this subject, and I am deeply saddened by your hasty attempt to prevent this process from unfolding. Should you choose to respond to my comments here, please avoid personal attacks, assume good faith, and always sign your comments using four tildes, so I can see that you've responded with your 'personal signature'. Thanks. +" WP:OUTING Again, I'm gonna report you, but please stop using personal names. (talk) " +" A belated welcome! ]]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Patagonier. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on , consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ''XЯaɣ " +Hi, I am new to wikipedia and do not understand the references section. Could you give me some guidance? +Webster is a verifiable source. The criticism is as you say relevant to the subject's notability and can be rsourced to reliable secondary sources. So by your own admission, Esterson's edit conforms to our policies. But you know what? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia anyone can edit. If you think Esterson added something that is not part of Webster's critique, delete it. But do not fault him for adding Webster's critique. When you chose not to make an edit that would improve content, and instead attack an editor, you are failing to assume good faith and it makes it look like you care more about stirring up conflict with editors than improving articles. In this case, improving articles means adding notable views, especially critical ones. I do not see how you can oppose this. By the way, I never mentioned my being an administrator. I am an editor and all editors ought to know and uphold wikipedia policy, including you. | Talk +Legal Aspects New Source Turns out that Israel has issued a legal brief defending its conduct in regards to the blockade and raid. I am not, at this time, interested in getting involved in editing the legal aspects section, but thought this would be a great source for those who were. +"How about the name of this ""documentary"" wiki claims she won an Emmy for? Her CNN bio makes no specific claim that she won an Emmy. 99.141.246.39 " +History section needs to be summarised as it has its own entry. +The version on there now is the correct one in my opinion. Are you saying that you're going to leave it? +FUCK YOU, YOU GAY ASS LIBERAL!!! hey asshole why dont you get your face out of the fucking child molestes homepage and go fuck your self you gay ass liberal mother fucker i hate jews like you fuck you and your whole fucking family you fucking sand nigger lover +They got the pop punk sound so I'm gonna add pop punk to their current genre. - Arranox +Go ahead and publish. I will not touch it. You have gone to the trouble of writing an article unlike the slovenly stub (e-mailed to you) that I deleted. — RHaworth +,.=+=.,,.=+=.,,.=+=.,,.=+=., This block has been set to expire: 16:35, 14 August 2009. 152.157.169.115 +If you look at the Macedonia article, Future Sunrise makes a reference to it around the time the name of the article was discussed. Laveol, I meant every word... like I stated your goal is suppression and for you to play it cool doesn't make it any less truthful +since deadliest was covered in the first half of the sentence, the second should specifically say injured imo +Looks like it is my spaces. I guess I will start filtering for spaces as well. Was trying not to do that cause it will bring in so many more hits. But will do what we must. ) - +. Perhaps it's neutral in MY point of you, you are just pro-american scum. Therefore, YOU are the biased one +why was i blocked, cock suckers? +So... Are you gonna help me with the basics of wikipedia cleanup? +" In my opinion, it's all right to make a small note of the similarities, maybe under a controversies header. I think a big list outlining all the similarities as it is right now is quite ridiculous. I've read all 3 mangas in question up to the current chapters and there definitely is inspirations that are being drawn, but the progression and content of each story is completely different... nothing deserving of an in-depth negative list, making the readers believe it's a knockoff. ""Both the characters had hard childhoods"", ""There are several timeskips"".... give me a break, I'm surprised you guys left out ""They all have spikey hair and big eyes!"". (matt)" +Yes, you are a real bully! You are a pathetic failure. You are an inferior person. You are a degenerate. +" ""Cobber"" is no longer in genuine usage. To anyone under 40 it is a word only heard in Chips Rafferty movies. It is only used in an ironic or deliberately archaic sense. I have moved it back to the archaic Australianisms section. 08:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)" +I am a mother-fucking dweeb ! +This is just not fair. Just because you don't like it, does not mean no one else will. Who are you to say that this is not impottant enough. +Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Welbz) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Dil +What the hell man! Look, I'm really pissed that you took off Danny on the recurring list of the o.c.....what the hell is your problem??? +Quite so. Bullshit artists - like every other Greek male I have met in my life.2.103.197.76 +" New meteor shower http://earthsky.org/space/new-meteor-shower-might-coincide-with-2012-geminids (talk✉) " +" outline articles I read your posts about outlines on AnnaFrance's talk page and decided to call the military history project for help in establishing guidance and providing review processes where editors can get outside opinion. The thread can be found here. Greetings Historical outlines Regarding Category:Historical outlines... I still strongly believe those ""Historical outline of foo"" articles should actually be named ""Timeline of foo"". More accurate and precise, and perhaps comprehensible. (I mentioned it before somewhere, but can't find it now). For an example, compare Outline of Illinois history with Timeline of Chicago history. Maybe we need to upgrade List of timelines to be a part of the Portal:Contents/ set? Just a note, for you to consider, whilst you're mass-moving things around... ) Based on the way the history section of outlines have been developed (especially the history sections of country outlines), the major classification scheme seems to be: By period By region By subject Which makes these articles general outlines, rather than timelines. The ""By period"" section may be a timeline, if it is formatted that way. As far as I can tell, the ""historical outline of"" articles by Buaidh aren't chronological, but topical, which makes them generic outlines rather than outlines of the timeline variety. The Transhumanist    " +. In his earlier films like Amaravathi, Pavithra his voice is dubbed by Vikram as well.The wind or breeze Eventually +"==What is a ""real"" Clan?== Your argument is interesting but despite popular belief there was little difference between most Lowland clans and Highland clans. The Lowlanders were involved in many clan battles and feuds too. The way Scotland was run you needed a clan to hold land and power. Of course some were more violent than others and some Lowland clans were not involved in any violent clan-like activitties at all but they are in the minority. It was centuries ago and we are all at peace now. " +Reliable sources being the ones who reflect your worldview of course! Wikipedia isn't here to spout politically correct drivel. Let's instead focus on facts. Let's try and have more accuracy please. +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Good luck with the Dianne Goolkasian Rahbee article. +Yes, exactly what you said. I'd assumed...seemingly correctly...that my point was obvious. I was actually going to just delete those three (which sadly an IP can't get away with such GF edits these days), but this is okay too I guess, apart from Bloom...which I don't think is a 'departure' either as such, currently contradicts itself a little (whip was resigned or withdrawn?) and is somewhat inaccurate ('assault' 'audience'). I'mma rearrange them a little, & remove 'notable'. 92.15.61.7 +Seek primary source mentioning 1845 lightweight tiara made for Gregory XVI +I don't, but I think that it's fine how it is, as it seems to me that it adds length without adding clarity. 21:56, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) Construction animation There are links on this article to a Korean heptadecagon construction animation, which is good besides being unable to read it. But I'm wondering, since Wikipedia should be a repository of knowledge and not a collection of links to other places with that knowledge, should I post a heptadecagon construction animation as I have for other polygons? I'm hesitant because it'd be messy and about 360KB. 21:56, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) +QED As long as we're tattling to the teacher, AnotherSolipsist said I'm ludicrous, and he started it! Gwernol, I'm sorry to be a pain in your ass - you're a good Wikipedian just doing your job. I just can't stomach these people. Do what you must. OK, I'll quit being a pain in the ass. Googie Man. +The intro to this article seems pretty subjective, a NPOV would improve it's quality. +" LoL, ""We don't want to hear?"" Elitist Douche who obviously has a disdain for us IP-editors to add to your disgraceful manner, I for one have found Jacks comments very insightful and interesting so I appreciate them and Maxis too. 213.100.108.117 " +"==Notability of Fox club, the== A tag has been placed on Fox club, the, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cheers, (talk) " +": A case of forgery I found in her book was a ""quotation"" formed by taking parts of two sentences a few pages apart in a report and joining them together in the wrong order. However, generally ""fradulent"" would be a more accurate description as it covers biased editing of quotations, selective presentation of sources, and sometimes blantant lies about what sources contain. Better not start me on it. Some scraps of previous debate can be found at Talk:Palestinian refugee. 12:14, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC) " +Kishore babu Gottipati born in the Ancient village pasumarru located 2 km away from chilakaluripet mandal in guntur district,Andhra pradesh, India. He has born on september 7 1978. He did schooling in st.charles high school. He did Bachelors in Electronics from SCAS college, Maddirala. He completed MCA from Bharathiar University. He is cool minded and positive thinking attitude. His hobbies are playing cricket, watching movies, reading political news, site seeing . +It was pretty odd behaviour- someone jumping in with size ten feet. I've got another artist in my sandbox- Tessa Beaver- never heard of her till yesterday when I found one of her etchings in a charity shop. +" Sorry to sound like a pain, but one by following me here is a tad stalking in all honesty but I'm not too bothered about that. But the main worry is that you have just assumed badly that I was referring about you, when it is clear I wasn't. One should never jump to conclusions without checking facts. And if you read my post above more carefully the line reads ""I got accused on an Olympic article's talk page about being a liar and not being a volunteer"" - please tell me where in that line did I mention an IP or anyone for that matter - I said I got accused; and I even told you on that talk page that it was another user who accused me, not you. Please stop twisting words out of context; its is not amusing. Mouse " +" gasp* Was that a personal attack? Again though, in order to find that you'd have to float through ""sex"" first and realize it's not dirty enough for you before continuing on to that. Either way, even the un-prudish see this article to be a joke (unargued by you). So your refusal to change the article even though change has been requested and controversy continuously raised (before me, see the archives), means the page stagnates at its low status. Primetech " +I mentioned the rationale behind the edits. +Why was my Thrust1 edit reverted? I removed Category:Thrust project as it didn't exist, and moved the article from Category:Jet land speed record cars to Category:Jet cars, as Thrust1 was not itself a land speed record car (despite being constructed as part of the Thrust project to break the land speed record). Instead it was a low-speed test vehicle built to allow the team to gain experience in driving a jet-propelled vehicle. +" The thing is, it doesn't actually help RK ""win"" his arguments, it just makes him look silly and full of bluster. Wikipedia doesn't, and shouldn't, operate on ""official"" censure, and doesn't, and shouldn't operate on appeals to authority (i.e. ""senior Wikipedians""). RK can be talked down. I've seen many people do it before, and the result is often vastly superior articles, because people take the time to read first sources in order to counter his bluster. So I would suggest learning to talk things out rather than running to the cops. If you don't think you can deal with RK right now, work on something else until you're up for it - the Wikipedia is vast. 16:38, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)" +stop editing the truth that i posted in the MTV Jams article desgraciado! +" arabs Your bot keeps capitalizing the word ""arabs"" in contexts like Canis arabs. Please fix! Many species are named ""arabs"". " +Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz Hi. Just thought I'd let you know that I've declined your G1 nomination of Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz. The G1 criterion is very narrow, and should generally only be applied to pages consisting of incomprehensible gibberish with no meaningful content. Thanks!  Fool +Turkey is not Europe Turkey is not Europe and any references must be deleted from the article +WikiProject templates == (continuation of discussion on where is the listed consensus on which WikiProject template should be placed on an article) +Fictional toymakers Please add Category:Fictional toymakers and toy inventors. 72.67.93.68 +] Hi Bhaddani I totally totally aunderstand!! I'm feeling the so much better today you can't believe I really had fun so far this weekend ) If you have a chance you can go to my resuquest for comment and leave a note and such if you want. +" Guest Book!! i guess,, u hav a guest book right?,,,sry i can`t see it now!! Regards, ★ ." +REDIRECT Talk:Barbados v. Trinidad and Tobago +PLUTO IS A PLANET; END OF STORY. +Fuck off... 85.73.224.212 +These links are legitimate community resources, NOT SPAM. Some of these links have been part of this article for over a year, some for over 2 years. If you can't tell the difference between spam and a legitimate community resource, then you have no business editing this article. +Having seen a photo of a grape-picker harvesting this vineyard I can well beleive the 76 degrees. +No, but I am sure you'll find a minority whose size is proportionally opposite to the volume with which the yodle that would like it to be otherwise +Shield size confusion On Rocky Hill - Glastonbury Ferry, you changed a 3-digit shield to 20px. Aren't you the one who told me that that gets 25px? - +"====Regarding edits made during December 15 2006 (UTC) to Mighty Morphin Power Rangers==== Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — (竜龍) " +wow wow, he rocks. +wikiproject cities Thanks for pointing me to Wikiproject Cities (via the discussion about where to put libraries, where BTW I totally agree with you). I have completely reorganized the Point Loma article to bring it into line with the Wikiproject cities guidelines. When you get a chance, please check it out and make any modifications or corrections you think would improve it. MelanieN +" K2 Network Hey Ryan, just inquiring about the status of the page editing we were speaking about on my talk page regarding the K2 Network entry. I'm not in any particular hurry, but I just wanted to make sure it hadn't slipped through the cracks. Hope all is well! Dweller's nom Yes, feel free to co-nom. I look forward to reading what you have to say about him. '''''''''' Smile! (Whisper...) has smiled at you! Smiles are good! and hopefully this one has made your day better. Why not smile at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend? Happy editing! RfA thanks I'd like to thank you formally for the support you gave me both before and during my RfA - It really helped to know at the start that you thought that I would make a good administrator. I'll try to live up to that expectation. Thank you. (t.c.) " +Offer up proof of your claim. +" Well, you're claims were pretty outlandish, but I'm willing to assume good intentions. On Wikipedia, anything that's likely to be challenged must be cited. I know you cited it, but you can't use other Wikipedia articles to cite information. You have to use reliable and independent sources to cite any information you add to articles. To review: (1) Anything that's likely to be challenged by a reasonable individual must be referenced (here is some potentially useful info on referencing) (2) References must be from reliable sources (i.e. books by respectable individuals/publishers; news articles, etc.) that are neutral and independent from the topic. (they do not have some type of vested interest in pushing any particular point of view) (3) You cannot use another Wikipedia article as a source. Wikipedia is always looking for editors interested in making this place better. If you want to join, great! The mistake you make might be construed as vandalism; please refrain from making those types of edits. Furthermore, you're welcome in this community but please familiarize youself with the concepts I've laid out above. Hope this helps, '''''' (talk • contribs) " +" Yes, I suppose it's human nature still... this person is just disparaging me left and right... accusing me of racism when all I did was remove non-editorial talk he left on Talk:Michael Richards and now I'm a ""shameful Muslim""... perhaps that can be chalked up to human nature as well. -S (→) " +hey there sexy, how you doin'? 98.208.65.56 +Even if I'm leaving this bullshit of Wikipedia forever, I will observe as well what kind of negotiations you will be able to do here, since you began to talk here about gays and Catholic/Orthodox Chuch, instead of caring of this fucked-ass article. Let me tell you a last thing: if you all will continue on this way, you will solve nothing and never. I hope the only 2-3 users here that are logical and know what's the Romanian diaspora will succeed. Good luck to them... P.S> you have motivation to be happy now when I'm leaving (to:Anittas, Ronline, Constantzeanu, Greier and many others) Arthur 28 April 2006 +" The tag was about the allegation of ""repression, mismanagement, and corruption"", which can clearly be defined as an expression of the personal point of view of the asshole who has written such a sentence. Every affirmation demands a reference. ;) ~~... Поговори со мной" +REDIRECT Talk:Aegis Combat System +WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUNISM IS CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM. WIKIPEDIA LOVES ME. THEY LIKE TO CENSOR ME. COMMUN +You're right, so I removed them. +File:January 1947 Speedy Weeny Magazine Article.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:January 1947 Speedy Weeny Magazine Article.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +Please leave You have been abusing your right as an administrator when one writes something that you disagree with. It's about them you step now. +need the gentle introduction/overview? +Hi, this Klptyzm again. I'm a faggot who will never leave users alone, and yes I'm a stalker. You're right Sean and Manny. I need to stop being a fag, because I quite for good and I'll fuck my momma +how do yoU delete wiki akkount? +the basis for removing the del ponte material is that she signed the june 2013 report which was 'agnostic' about chemical weapons having been used by rebel forces , she was premature speaking out kind of thing, the report supersedes her earlier talk, - you remain 'agnostic' but sellstrom and the report came to its conclusions - -'poor theories' he called the theories of the ' rebels/ Saudis/turks did it ' crowd - , poor theories pushed by whoever, are poor theories - you may have weighed hersh in the balance and found him credible, full stop, as a person you've vetted, if hersh writes about ghouta, sarin, chemistry, diplomacy, baseball , he is credible , about anything and everything , for you - but so what? - for the article its fringe imo -he is fringe , or 'poor theory' pusher if you don't like hersh called fringe on ghouta -so all the intelligence officers in the world that sy hersh hob-nobs with, , all the mandarin know-alls , all the knowers of super-secret stuff, of rat lines and false flags, haven't persuaded sellstrom have they, and don't you think he is 'credible ? more credible on chemical attacks than hersh, - who takes hersh seriously on ghouta? - RT? and my goodness, hershs articles are referenced and quoted anyhow all over the article last I saw. he is not being gagged is he +" Well done, Xav. ;) Check out user:AGK/Advice for new Administrators if you have a mo'! All the best, " +":Much better. D 123 (talk) " +"Hmm... it would appear commiemike is now trying to whitewash the history of his ""glorious leader"" Zeidler even further. " +While I respect your stance on homosexuality, I do not think Wikipedia should be used as an avenue to support the pro-gay cause. There is simply no big deal about a clergyman denouncing homosexuality. More than half of the world still do not welcome homosexual acts. I do not support the inclusion of that information on this article. It will be WP:UNDUE. +"Incidents such as this are often referred to as ""Silviaesque Shitscapades"" on MMA Radio shows such as Fightlinker's ""Low Blow: Mailbag"". Keep on shittin' Big Tim. " +" Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Chronic If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices." +I put this articles bias into question. What chemical experts say that chemistry should not be in the electron article. Chemistry plays an important role in the discovery, and quantanization of the electron, and should be in the article. I dont see how you can have these obscure physical articles, like electron theory about positive and negative electrons in space, but you cant mention a single chemicle principle in the article. I overheard you at a resteraunt, that you think chemist are stupid and we only need physics. Glad to know your bias. And you have a bias, because you can mention physics but not chemistry. +got a fellow loser to tell me off did you? Think I give a fuck?! Block me then you co**sucker - clever people don't give a f*ck about editing Wikipedia? Just because Wikipedia has turned you into its b*tch, you can't see that being blocked is not a 'punishment'. If it happened to you it would be a blessing, but you'll never see how much time and life you've completely WASTED, because your brain is mush. Fuc*in wretch. Now get back to looking at Raw guest hosts and other childish wrestling topics. You make me sick - a grown man devoting his life to watching basted men in pants pretending to scrap. Did you enjoy watching Randy Orton's glistening belly button and atomic wedgie last week? It's f**king amoebas like you that have kept this most pathetic excuse for entertainment going for all these years - it should have died when all the redknecks finally found out it wasn't real. How this can still be a viable business in this day and age? But when there's enough 'people' with flea brains so abysmal to sit there editing Wikipedia most minutes of the day, it's no real f**king surprise. +How could you forget the Bowe-Holyfield trilogy!? -) 08:16 27 May 2003 (UTC) +Article locked for editing for four years!? Isn't that overkill? 185.28.20.244 +It says just that! Scotland is a country....It is part of the United Kingdom. Is the United Kingdom not a country? +Just for clarification you're a cock. Congrats on having software that can detect IP changers. Glad I only got it on the trial. No, you really are a cock. +Swedish 1SG == This may appear way wrong, but it reflects the view of the Swedish Armed Forces, not my own. == +Are you a self appointed mod or something? +I just wanted you to know that you're worthless... Why did you make changes to the Lethbridge Collegiate Institute article? You probably aren't even Canadian and to think that you can remove something that is very important to LCI history is unfathomable. It would make me very happy if you killed yourself sometime today or tomorrow, as you are no longer needed on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time. +Dinoguy2, I can't vouch for the technical accuracy of your changes (I am not an expert) but your edit seems clearer and certainly reads better IMO. Well done. +labour friends of israel i'm sorry, but if ignorance is defined as 'lacking knowledge of', u r indeed ignorant on this topic. lfi is not a single issue grp and it is not wise to rely on its 'official' summary to give a full and accurate picture of its raison d'etre. +" December 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. hi! If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." +" Hi Lulubyrd, would you be so kind as strike out or remove your post for the reasons I explained in the ANI thread? (Reader's digest version: because it's not true, I even gave you a diff, and because I'm bothered you'd say such things). If you would do, then perhaps I owe you an apology for not WP:AGFing and assuming you wouldn't. It's not like our paths will cross very often, if ever, but why not score another friend? Like you said in the article talk, the sources I cited didn't support ""Sabbatic Witchcraft"", and... hey now, believe it or not, I was aware of that. You are welcome. Polemics make it difficult to communicate effectively.. there was no dispute, and no good options... but if you had renamed the article Sabbatic Craft, no one would have undone it. Better still, if you had suggested deletion and mentioned there was already a writeup in Contemporary witchcraft, I would have been behind that 100%, (even just mentioning the latter, I'd have suggested the former), with redirect 'natch. ""Sabbatic Current"" works ok as a section header, but because it's so obscure, it couldn't be used for the article per the guidelines for WP:TITLE, and while ""Sabbatic Craft"" would have been better in that regard, it's supposed to be proprietary—the kanundrum... In addition to struggling with the guideline, I was trying to find a way to go by what Chumbley said too... and that's consistent with what you thought WP should do, yes? Do you have any concerns with the redirects for Sabbatic witchcraft and Sabbatic Craft? It's a sure bet you know way more about Sabbatic Craft than I intend to learn. What did you think of the changes I made to Contemporary witchcraft#Sabbatic Current? Is there a particular section in the Chumbley article that would be good to point the Cultus Sabbati redirect to? (My impression was none in particular, but I only read it once through). Was the link to cunning folk copacetic?— " +" Fix introduction This article has been vandalized by users who are trying to support CATO and friends' agenda. They have changed the name to something that is unrecognizable, nobody in the world who knows about this calls it the ""general motors streetcar conspiracy"" you will not find that in primary sources. The real name of this is ""Great American Streetcar Scandal"" because that is the only name that is used in primary sources. We need to block the accounts of people who have destroyed this article for one according to our official policy of ""Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point"" which has been done by these libertarians. Most of the article text remains intact, but the introduction and ""other factors"" section are catastrophes with no other purpose than keep this very real, and remembered in some circles once you ask them about it, event unknown. Somebody needs to take out the weasel words and make it agree with the body of the text. Also, remove the CATO reference, it is unreliable and propaganda. " +Is it true? I had heard you like to suck cock. Is it true? +" Intro needs urgent fixing The last two sentences in the intro need rewording/or a strong citation: ""The situation surrounding his assasination continues to be murky, while he reportedly was assasinated by Nation of Islam officials, he also had many enemies in the United States government. It is widely believed that the government also had a role in the assasination."" I am no expert on the man but I have checked several reliable sources (E.g. ""Malcolm X"" Encyclopedia Britannica. 1990 Ed.) and they don't say anything about a government role. I am not saying that the viewpoint is untenable, but I don't think 'widely believed' is correct. If someone more knowledgeable on the subject doesn't do it in the next day or so then I will (I am hesitant to leap in as I imagine that this article can be controversial). Also, it's spelt Assassination (unless us Aussies are out of step with the rest of the world on that one – happens occasionally.) " +Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory, and is not for advertising or promotion of any kind +Progressive Dance music I see you don't surrender, eh? What else can I do t0 show you that electronic music 'is not electronic dance music? Did you ever realize that no university in the USA regard electronic music and the music for dancing as the same genre? Are you aware that this is not a music magazine? Are you aware of the meaninng of the term encyclopedic? Are you aware of the difference between idiomatic expressions, slang and encyclopedid (formal) language? Are you aware that most of articles claiming to deal with electronic music subgenres are unsourced or grounded only on independent websites? +Not if the election was fraudulent. +Dont fuck with wikipedia admins you filthy jew (tlk) (cntrbtns) +That picture is okay so stop creating a fuss +I am moving the list of european supporters to here otherwise her biography page gets clogged up with names of supporters. The only support which matters is next year at election 2012. The experts say that Manipuris are backward and need to be educated about democracy. The arab spring has taught the experts that it is the people who need to educate their political masters on what kind of democracy they want. I hope Manipuris at last take the opportunity to free Sharmila and rid Manipur of the black law next year. On 28 November 2010, UK Green Party leader and European Parliament member Keith Taylor wrote to the Indian government seeking the release of Sharmila and the repeal of the AFSPA. Her main supporter in the European Union is Sir Graham Watson KB MEP chair of the India/EU delegation of MEPs. He has consistently made interventions on her behalf most recently to Dr J Bhagwati Indian Ambassador to the EU who responded on 1 July 2011 to his request to respond to the death threats made against Irom Sharmila. Indian Ambassadors reference BRU/AMB/48/2011 Embassy of India, 1050 Brussels. He responds only that he understands that Irom Sharmila is a hunger striker and that the modification of AF(SP)A is under consideration. Previously in April 2011 Sri Graham Watson and the EU delegation had tried to visit Manipur but were not allowed to do so by the Indian Authorities. They visit each year this year they were allowed to visit, Delhi, Patna and Mumbai. Although Keith Taylor did write three letters on one occasion he has never responded to further input. Sri Graham Watson and other members of the EU delegation do always respond to further requests for help. For example a Dutch member of the India EU delegation Peter Van Dalen whose special interest group is Dalit and subaltern groups released this press statement for publication at the gathering at her tenth anniversary of fasting in November 2010 Smt Sharon Bowles MEP sent Sharmila a personal letter of support which is now with Sharmila. She had added her personal regret that Sharmila was not nominated for the Sakharov last year due to insufficient support from other MEPs a nomination requires at least 40 MEP signatories. This year's nominations close on 13 September 2010. Another MEP member of the EU/India Delegation has stated that he does not believe Sharmila will be nominated this year either as very few MEPs know of her or Manipur. The European MEPs were initially brought in by one of her Western campaigners Nicholas Crawford a philosophy student at Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge. He also chairs a small student think tank. The Wilberforce Society. At the annual garden party Mr Crawford gave a speech about Irom Sharmila and the AFSPA in attendance was their patron Lord Wilson, a former head of the civil service, and Sir Christopher Hum, former UK ambassador to China. Before Xmas they hope to have a seminar on India and Human Rights. And plan to visit Manipur and Sharmila next summer. Sharmila has many letters from offices of Western Dignatories including those of HM Queen Elizabeth II, The Duchess of Cornwall, The President of Eire, Tony Blair and most recently the Scottish First Minister and the Mayor of London all stating that they are sorry about her circumstances but are unable to offer her any assistance. But she has always cared more about genuine letters seeking to make connections. +" No. Wikipedia is not a humor site. You may be looking for Uncylopedia. Talk " +" I also wanted to thank you for your recent reversion of vandalism on the 14th amendment page. Good job!e (talk) " +Sweden has a prime minister. See Prime Minister of Sweden. +Well, looks like we'll have to agree to disagree. I'm going to continue to call it fancruft in the edit summaries as it is a good short name. I suppose unencyclopedic would be better but I can't spel that. +Uncivil behaviour from User:BilCat and User:Dave1185|WP:WQA +" Happy Thanksgiving! Happy Thanksgiving! Just stopped by to wish you a Happy Thanksgiving! When you're eating your turkey, think of the little fellow to the left! – Tropical Cyclone " +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Rory096 +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jewish Agency for Israel. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  – '''' " +, and a permanent UN Security Council seat. The UK, France, Germany, and Japan, in my POV are similar in overall power, (combined economic, military, diplomatic power) and have remained stable in the amount of power they hold. The US obviously remains a superpower. +It sounds like consensus to me too. Time limit for out-of-date sources There was some discussion earlier in Talk:Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Should_we_remove_AT_Internet_Institute_from_web_client_stats.3F. I think it's fair to say there's a consensus that we should apply the same time limit, whatever that limit is, to all the sources. At the moment it's 12 months. Someone suggested we should reduce it to 6 months. (If we did that then ATII would get removed on 1st April if they haven't updated by then, because they last updated on 31/9/2010.) So, should be cut the time limit to 6 months? +, was it perhaps random? Gothaparduskerialldrapolatkh +" Regarding Citations I was adding citations in response to the ""Citations Needed"" mark. I was wondering which is preferable, adding the citations directly in the table next to the award in question or after the sentence where the ""Citation Needed"" mark was posted? Thanks. 77.28.96.46 Dane" +" You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - In a city near you! - You are invited!The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2012 across the United States and Canada - including Chicago! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join! Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here! You are receiving this email because you have attended or expressed interest in attending a meetup in the past. My apologies if you find it intruding!" +...lol! Smart, I say. Smart!! P +Ulster Scots Hello and welcome. Please note that article talk pages are for editors (like you and I) to collaborate on improvements to the articles, not for general discussion. By the way, in the spirit of your posting: my research suggests that Scots was invented in the 1980s by Rab C. Nesbitt, to promote his sitcoms. This discovery was appropriated by people in Culleybackey who, up until them, did not have a name for their made-up language. (or Hrothulf) (Talk) +[File:TamilActorVijayimage.JPG] This image is taken by me and created by me .. So I'm the copy right holder , I know not how to include this details please guideThe wind or breeze +Hi Macwhiz, just wanted to say thanks for the copyedit. Your a star; theirs no mistake ;-) +" Scotty, I don't want to see you leave either, but what you said (about ""my entire existence"") belittles my contributions in an unacceptable manner. I got fucking blocked for responding to your sneer, so eating some crow on your part is no more than fair, it seems to me. " +2009 (UTC) FOLLOW UP: And a month later, you still haven't done me the courtesy of replying to my inquiry. I'll be moving this matter on to another (hopefully more competent), editor for resolution. In the future, if you can't be responsive, then please just leave the editing to those that actually understand and appreciate the purpose of WikiPedia - it's not your personal sandbox to play with! 23:31, 7 October +What's that 12.205.247.27 deletion? I see IP 12.205.247.27 made some kind of change a few days ago. However, instead of someone undo'ing the change, it was actually removed. What happened there? That IP doesn't seem to have vandalizing habits - there are only a few edits from there. +This is not about it's validity as a hospital and it's not about demonisation it about recording reality. The terms used to characterise the patients are very bland it doesn't provide a description. +And Jess and Mallexkion, yes I understand it not conclusive evidence, but you must understand its suggestive evidence, and our readers have a right to know about it and make up their own minds! +No, the Dumbest Shit Ever meter went right off the scales at that talk page. My comment just tipped it to 6. +" Re: Hughes. Yes, I think you're right that they were no longer lovers at that time. But you didn't change ""was her lover"" to ""had been her lover,"" you just deleted the entire paragraph, which I dispute. Instead, I propose: With the help of Howard Hughes, who at one time had been her lover, she purchased the rights to the play and turned it into a hit movie. The movie was very important to her career and it's an interesting and pertinent detail that Hughes was so involved in helping her make it a reality. I certainly don't want to perpetuate errors, but let's talk about how to fix them instead of just deleting information wholesale. Re: Hepburn and Tracy's living situation what would you suggest instead? How about something like... Hepburn and Tracy were undeniably a couple, but only lived together regularly until the last few years of Tracy's life. Even then, they maintained separate homes to keep up appearances. Re the Hughes/Hepburn engagement I believe there was a NYT article that announced their engagement, or announced that it was off, but I haven't had time yet to find it. Re Hepburn and Smith's marriage, from Higham: The marriage was a disaster. Kate had such a horror of domesticity that the whole experience was a nightmare. She evidently realized that she had married on a whim and that marriage was totally incompatible with her need for absolute freedom of thought and action. Three weeks after the marriage took place, the couple separated. Faced with the fact that he had a failed marriage, Luddy sensibly decided to continue with Kate on a platonic basis. She remained legally married to him for several years. Do you have something that refutes this? I'd be glad to source it specifically to Higham in the text of the article if you like. " +" Thanks [[, you're right, sorry, I am indeed using the 2002 edition I was looking at the page listing all the editions and it looked like 1980 was the final edition. The 2002 is ISBN 0 300 09733 6. (talk) " +"Thank you for experimenting with the page Rwandese Patriotic Front on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. e " +", 7 April 2010 (UTC) I changed your edit to bring the link outside the ""ref"" tag to make it more visible. Soap— 00:43" +" Replacing this article with a redirect to libertarianism Given that there are many sources that say the terms are used interchangably, but that libertarian is a far more common term and a less controversial word, this page should be replaced by a redirect to libertarianism. FloNight, thank you for your efforts to salvage this whole mess, but I do not think you understand how and why this phrase is used. It is a propaganda word, like partial-birth abortion, and merely having an article under the heading, just as having a ""partial birth abortion"" article, expresses a viewpoint that is biased." +"you keep suggesting that I'm somehow ""in league"" with Ryulong and then you said, " +" Edit Request: ""River"" cover release Rebecca Black has confirmed on her Twitter account that the cover of ""River"" and YouTube channel is by a poser. Anyone who is able to, please remove the information at Wikipedia ASAP. I can't because the page is protected. 218.186.17.237 " +Harut Grigorian Harut Grigorian 2 I noticed you didn't reply, so I figured you didn't see mine. C/P Original discussion: Would you please undelete this page? It's been edited by other people other than the creator and is a useful page about a growing star in the sport. The creator made this before he/she was banned and it's only benefical to the wiki. The creator (a sock puppet of at the time, and the article has had no significant edits made by others. I have no problem with somebody else recreating the article, but I cannot entertain such a request to allow a user who knows that he can get away with it to allow his edits to remain. MuZemike Why was he banned in the first place and his 2012 and 2011 in kickboxing pages removed? If you can't tell me, I understand, but he seemed to just be trying to contribute. Is there any way I can view the former article to help me create a new one? As you probably know, it's quite time consuming. +I AM SICK AND FUCKING TIRED OF SEEING THIS MOTHERFUCKER'S FACE. THIS ASSHOLE WAS A PIECE OF SHIT WHO MASTERMINDED THE MURDER OF 3,000 INNOCENT PEOPLE. FOR THIS COCKSUCKING ANTI-AMERICAN MOTHERFUCKER TO HAVE AN ARTICLE IS INSULTING TO EVERY VICTIM OF 9/11. IF I COULD EXHUME MOHAMMED ATTA'S BODY AND BRING HIM BACK TO LIFE, I WOULD. THEN I WOULD WATERBOARD HIM FOR DAYS ON END. +Yes, definitely the Sword of St Paul as patron of London, on the cross of St George for England. The London Diocese coat of arms is also a pair of crossed swords for the same reason. 79.72.80.60 Tony S +" Weight ""The largest known species reached weights of 6 to 8 tons while exceptionally large males may have exceeded 12 tons."" I was intending to add a conversion table to this, but there is a lot of difference in the definition of a ton in different countries, and it's unclear what the author actually meant. Does anyone know what the estimated weight was in kilograms, so I can put in a table to clarfy for readers from different countries? " +RFC Where is the mention of the use of the RFC as a dodge to circumvent the elaborate approval mechanisms in use by the ITU? +so do you have a WP:RS that states they didn't attend or that there was a reduced number of people? Because right now yes, they were summoned and the way the reliable source reads they attended. +":: Need You Now is really the only one I care about & I already did it. (its SO stalking =P) - Tà£k " +" Hmm... I'm not too sure. Siege currency seems to be a different field. I was debating including that billet de confiance as it's not clearly a playing card (None of these are). I've found this one, but it doesn't say ""billet de confiance]. Neither does this. —  " +The excuse for the battle was marriage alliance. Real cause was age-old envy between Kammas and Velamas. +You're right, in a case like this it should be done by vote, but the options should be to merge or to stay as-is, not a more convuluted option of managing two seperate versions in two different articles. When I get back from my vacation, I'll see if I can find a better way to promote this article so it receives more attention and can receive a wider range of votes, as it seems to be very low-interest. 22:01, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) +Trashorras the topic about Roberto Trashorras, I say you that, already I put the picture in the english, spanish wikipedia and commons attributing the authorship to its owner (in Galician Wiki), regards. +Possibly the dumbest argument I have ever heard. Are all wikipedia users fags or just you? The Wikipedia is not a gameguide retardedness doesn't even apply here. It's not telling you how to unlock the armors, just what they are. Or should we delete the characters and stories too? THOSE ARE IN GAME GUIDES!!! Fucking moron. +March 2011 (UTC) Well, we kn ow who that fourth Brazilian team is now: SANTOS! Yeah, Pele's old team. 00:43, 12 +" ""Piece of trash"" is inappropriate? " +How long am I blocked for now? +seems, at best, juvenile. +Divineprime, I suggest we continue this discussion on your talk page. +" Is it worthwhile keeping the old images on display in the article as well as the new images ? ☏ 00:39, 28 Jun 2012 (UTC)" +" So Fast! I tagged the hero and clicked save when i got an edit conflict! So fast! ;) Σagle " +" There is mistakes on this page ""Ад сэрца"" is not ""Hell 0f the heart"". Ад is hell in russian language , but it's not in belarussian. Hell in belarussian is pekla.""Ad"" is only a preposition like from . I don't know English so good to translate properly. Right translation is something like ""From the heart""." +"Bold textSECULAR HUMANISM AS SEEN FROM A CHRISTIAN I believe in a Theocracy [Isaiah 9:6,7].The Holy Spirit is my govenment.He calls me to be perfect[Matthew 5:48],there is no higher form of government than this.I am also a pacifist,and I believe as a Christian I am called to become a spiritual warrior against evil,not a material warrior.I believe both good and evil are spiritual forces,one is Light and the other is darkness. I see all secular governments in this world as my enemies.Whether Atheistic Communism,such as is seen in China and North Korea,or Democracy. As democracy becomes more and more secular,it becomes more and more my enemy.If democracy is to be truly secularized,then everything pertaining to God would need to be removed from it.I do not see the removal of God and the replacement of atheism as being an improvement in my world. Democracy ultimately must be my enemy,it is to complex,and it has to much material power for it to be a true branch of Christ's Government. I was shaped by Secular humanism at a very early age(10).I was not raised as a Christian.I accepted the theory of evolution in school,and became an atheist. This was a disaster for me,my life reached a dead end.I began searching for God,and found all of the answers to life's mysteries that were previously unanswered. Many ""Christians"" want a complex form of government such as democracy to do their dirty work for them,such as fight their material wars in order to ""save them"". My relgion teaches me that God is the only one who can save me.Many attempts have been made by both secular and religious governments to ""save us"". Any government which is backed by material weapons is antichrist[Matthew 5:43,44]. " +" You started the insult with your ""bullshit"" quirk in transformer article. Go home and sleep. " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  However, please do not create articles about yourself; this is against Wikipedia policy. Thanks! +Restored as contested deletion per WP:PROD. +I don't particularly have any interest in arguing over and over again. The addition is valid and correct and thus it should stay. +Okay, that makes a lot more sense now. I'll go ahead and process the verification. It might be nice to ask if she has any other pictures of her father, or could scan some in, it would be wonderful to have something slightly larger. babelfish +That seems reasonable. I just moved it back to it's original title. +", 22 December 2014 (UTC) If the table stays, the NOR tag stays as well. - (talk) 05:05" +Yeah. And of course, there's the birds. Can't let JJ get all of them. +did not realize that he had only spoken with representatives of the Tokugawa Shogun +There is a tool that looks for edits within a short time that are made by people in a specified group. The results for articles only are here, and for all pages are here. Click a timeline link (probably while holding down the Ctrl key) to see interactions for that specific page. +You arrogant, ignorant fool! You think you are the hottest thing on this site! NEWSFLASH: Your not! You know absolutely nothing about wrestling, and you present yourself like a seriously idiotic person. The next time you want to leave a message on my page again! LEARN TO SPELL! Silly bitch! ( ) +Trying to convince people to stay the hell away from this city... That's what I'm attempting to do here. And I certainly don't appreciate how you bots THINK your shit doesn't stink and let your egos run wild just because your free to edit ANYTHING you want... And all this BS has been coming from people who know NOTHING about this area unless they've lived here and seen it for themselves... And I can play this game of cat and mouse as long as your are willing to... Go ahead and ban me. I'll just use another computer at my workplace or the local cafe even!!! Cheers! +IMDB IMDB is not a reliable source; it is user contributed and does not cite its sources. +" No... we only categorize ""standard biographical information"" (year of birth/death, religious affiliation, national identity, etc.) and those things that are related to what ""makes the subject notable"". In Graham's case his masonic credentials are not what ""make him notable"". It does not really matter what Graham may have valued or what he was proud of... What matters is what sources (such as historians) think is of value. If there are sources that discuss his Masonic credentials, and talk about how they affected Graham's life and his achievements, then he would be Categorized. The truth is, being a 32nd degree Mason is not that noteworthy... any 3rd degree Mason can become one... all it takes is paying an initiation fee, and spending one afternoon watching the degree ceremony being performed as a play. In fact, you don't even have to take the 4th - 31st degrees as a prerequisite (you can jump right from being a 3rd degree to being 32nd). Now, if Graham had been a 33rd degree things would be a bit different... that degree is somewhat rare and is a special award given for service. As for being elected Master of a lodge, even that is not that notable... most lodges elect a new Master every year, and since there are tens of thousands of lodges in the US alone, this means that there are literally hundreds of thousands of Past Masters in the US. In smaller lodges, it is not uncommon for every member of the lodge to have a turn as Master. Now... if Graham had been elected Grand Master of an entire Masonic jurisdiction things would be different... state or national level Masonic office is somewhat notable (there are only hundreds and not thousands each year), and that is the level of notability that deserves categorization. All that said, both facts are interesting bits of biographical trivia, and probably should be ""mentioned in passing"". The place to do so is in the main body of the text. " +WHy don't you re-read my edits before getting inflammatory? Nowhere in my vandalism reversions was there a link. Additionally, I explained in edit summaries and several talk pages my rationale for reverting Hipocrite's blanking. My explanations make it clear that what I was doing was not harassment. Thanks you for your complete lack of attention in this matter. Warning struck-through as being inaccurate and baseless. (Karwynn) +I am afraid that function is currently down, and it would be much appreciated if you could simply continue combing through the article and trying to repair it to the best of your abilities. Thank you. +User is causing autoblocks like crazy +We apologise for all our past vandalisms, to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy and other articles. Sorry for all the vandalism. We are very repentant, and this is a genuine apology (bolded to show how important it is!). Vandalism isn't fun any more - we've been there, done that - yawn!! Whopper, this is a genuine apology. I doubt you'll see us much over those 29 days, but if you do, our contributions will be positive only (again in bold for emphasis!)! We've lost interest in vandalism - Yawn, that's boring, been there, done that!! Boring! Never again shall we vandalise, Whopper. +Vandalism (in an odd spot) here The vandalism is strange. Scroll and you'll see it. An article on Jean Marc Gaspard Itard was deleted; he was a very famous teacher of the deaf and is regarded as an early neurologist. Does this mean Itard is a banned subject? +" I discussed the problem whit the three shown banners whit the Wikipedia live-chat service and they told me to just delete them. I now noticed that you included them again in the article, so I now humbly request to the supremacy of Wizard191 to get rid of these three inaccurate information banners or at least specify the problem in the galling discussion page, as everybody else. If you haven´t read the galling article, how do you know it´s something wrong whit it? I can assure you that everything I put the Wikipedia galling article it is extensively peer-viewed and approved at Karlstad University, Sweden. What is this ""live-chat service"" that you speak of? I haven't ever heard of one. The proper way to discuss the templates is here on the talk page of the article. All three are applicable because: 1. the English needs to be improved 2. you have pretty much taken ownership of the article 3. the article needs more wikilinks. Hope that explains it. Hi dude, Wazz up , why didn´t you include my entire massege? It looks very miserable and whining, as it reads above =) Are you kidding me?, so you don´t have a ""Wikipedia live-chat service"", strange because I used it, and if that isn´t possible must sombody be realy evil. No suprise to me when the whole world is bullying and abusing people who have no means of fighting back, with the exeption of trying to make it so clear how horrific the discussion, realy can be. And it is to be hoped that somewhone in the crowd of onlookers finally realize the unreasonable and unjust in the many´s bullying against an unknowing victim or potential plaintiff. Regarding your, , complaints quotation: ""you have pretty much taken ownership of the article 3."" end quotation, I can only reply that there are several others who make contributions to the galling article and I only make sure it´s scientificly correct with regards to syntax and source. Some parts have I watched extra carefully, for example the pictures because I made them and it´s therefore easy for me to correct the content and syntax of the description. Other peaople are free to write any knew exiting findings and I will not change anything as long it´s has warranty. A lot of the text have been changed by others over the years and is still present in the article so don´t blame me for something that clearly isn´t true. I thought I did include the whole message, other than the greeting. If I missed something else, then feel free to copy it over; it was a mistake if I missed it. After looking through the history of the article it doesn't appear that you've taken ownership of the article. So I'm cool with dropping the COI tag. " +" Just letting you know that the CU team has looked into it and blocked some of the related accounts. • Talk " +" Also, another thing which should be improved upon is the article's title. On all the posters and advertisements I've seen for thes show, it is not called ""Blue Man Group at the Sharp Aquos Theatre"" but rather ""Blue Man Group Sharp Aquos Theatre"". Should the article be renamed? " +" The term ""national"" (referring to the Québecois or French Canadian nationality rather than to an independent country) has been in use for many decades or even centuries in Quebec. It is not challenged even by federalist Quebeckers. " +Shared IP . Thanks. 63.164.47.227 +Thanks for your keen observation. Yes I am a SPA but am letting you edit and others edit but that edit has to be meaningful. And your user page and talk page needs no explanation or description! +" You have recently re-created the article Tina Jones, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. You have recreated the above article and it is still a copyright violation. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. " +The Snake is Back! That's right, watch out, the snake is lurking; Sintheg2 +Browser problems? Looks like I have some issues Sam, thanks for catching this! Will try to put it right! 16:10, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC) +THANK TOU SOOOOO MUCH FOR ERASING MY COMMENTS WITHOUT ANSWERING THEM!!! You've proven me 100% right! +Actually honey, I'm not putting incorrect information nor am I removing relevant information, you all need to stop reverting my edits. The metro area of San francisco pages need a lot of editing especially when every other citys metro area articles have no issues and are fine, the greater San francisco area and the San Francisco Bay Area are the same thing +! END GROUP RESPONSE ABOVE THIS LINE > +" I thought that ""editor"" is some Wikipedia role, but anyway, even if its just the people editing articles, I'm not an ""editor"" as I only wanted to put some order and fixes in the article after I've read it and saw it was so clumsy. And ""Cum"" means ""Orgasm"". I don't get what's so hard for you to understand. But I must note that I've already seen several consecutive writing errors for you, so I don't think that you're the one who need to insistingly argue and revert my editings when I'm translating exactly what it is. And I didn't understand what were you talking about with that upper case thing. " +" You're not helping me, User:Zora. Right now I don't want to hear anything other than an explanation for why it's okay for User:Khoikhoi to just go up there and remove the dispute tags placed in by others but it's not okay for me to replace a dispute tag with a one that better reflects the situation we're having. Talk " +I presume this is all part of the control process that ensures the articles are safely under the control of Republicans - or else why haven't you posted a similar warning to One Night In Hackney who has been doing as much reverting as me? +"| I am really surprised by this. Anyway. I am Emil Janev, with user ""ejanev"". I have nothing to do with ""Damemk"" or any other user. Please feel free to request any information from me that might help in identifying me as myself with my user account. I am ready to give/send my email address. It is mentioned that I can contact any administrator by email. So please let me know if there is any e-mail where I can send this or any other required information. About the Lazar Kolisevski page: Lazar Kolisevski is born in Sveti Nikole. That's my birthplace too. I have lived there for almost 30 years. I certainly know well about the people that have lived and live there now. So if there is any way that I can send any information to confirm my case that I am Emil Janev, with user ""Ejanev"" please let me know. One other thing that comes of my mind is that somehow if ""Damemk"" is not a real user, but another user masked under ""Damemk"" I was badly set in this case. Thanks for your time. Sincerely. " +Africa template Yes! On behalf of WP:SADR, feel free to include the Western Sahara WikiProject in your template; this makes a lot of sense. Also, the notice template for that is broken, and if you really want something to do, you can fix it. -·T·C·M +Of course they are. I can see I didn't word that very well, and I'm sure Josette didn't mean it should be poked down at the tail of the article or whatever. Of course, ownership is important as are a lot of other points, but they can't all be put in the first three sentences and don't deserve to be. The problem is, a suggested rewrite showing the suggested structure of the whole article would be a waste of effort, instantly hacked and attacked by POVers. What would you say to the first three sentences I suggested, then followed by other information in order of logical descending relevance, much like a good article would be constructed. +put it up your bottom. +is the public policy debate that +That IP banning is working great, keep up the foul work, nazi +Hi there. Obviously I wasn't aware that it was you who was making the changes to your userpage, as it was just an IP address. Thanks for letting me know. +" I was looking for an actual quote and I only found this: ""The Chechen leader has derided allegations that he dispatched militias to Ukraine"" Again, you don't seem to know what paramilitary means. Just because some rebels ""look like they come from North Caucasus"", does not mean there is a Chechen paramilitary force operating in Eastern Ukraine. You might want to read wiki page on Paramilitary. Educate yourself. " +" Orphaned fair use image (Image:Worldcup98classicscreenshot.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Worldcup98classicscreenshot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (talk) (email) (Contr.) " +Dick Hey, dick. Why don't you go read the Aqua Teen Hunger Force wiki page for Marines episode and see where it actually says jigsaw. I say that would constitue in other media references, wouldn't you? Probably not, because it seems all of you wiki monitors are fucking cock sucking assholes who don't understand what the fuck is going on half the time. Seriously, you're a dick. Did you even read what I wrote, or did you just automatically delete it because you're a cock? Fuck you to death. +" Still concerned about balance I've put in a fair bit of time on the article, both in verifying/cleaning content and filling in material, enough that I think I can say I have gone over things in detail. Look, for example, at Korea and the Caribbean/Cuba/Cuban missile crisis; those are a start on what I think is encyclopedic coverage. Just to say, with no other background, that the CIA trained police or set up an Operation Gladio network really doesn't give information; I'd recommend waiting for more background and context. There are news reports from reputable journalists, but there are also quite a number from activists for varying positions. I'm afraid I don't give equal credit to a staff writer for the Washington Post and for the Revolutionary Worker. The article is impossibly long, yet its covert operations section is full of fragments. It's going to have to break up so those fragmentary sections can be edited; it's taking a long time to save the file now. Note that I was able to put estimative/analytic material in for Korea and Cuba. Much data of that sort is available, often in the form of the actual declassified documents. Not to put in relevant reports, National Intelligence Estimates, etc., gives the impression that the agency is purely covert operations, since the reports were almost never mentioned for countries I sawjust controversial ""dirty tricks"". That's not NPOV. Many sources are available for the report literature, including the George Washington University National Security Archives, the Avalon Project at Yale, the archives at Mount Holyoke, the military staff colleges and research institutes, the Foreign Relations of the United States series, and even the CIA FOIA Reading Room. There is, for example, a huge amount of reporting about Southeast Asia, including strong disagreements among the CIA, military, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and White House (Sam Adams' book, War of Numbers is excellent, but also see the Pentagon Papers). I'd like to suggest that people editing this look at some of my articles on the process of intelligence, which may help understand things that aren't just covert destabilization. Start with Intelligence cycle management, which will take you through a hierarchy of articles. The HUMINT sections do deal with clandestine rather than covert activity; I'm actively working on them. The article on Clandestine HUMINT and Covert Action is particularly relevant both in history, and balance between clandestine and covert activities. Especially in WWII, there was often a conflict between operations and intelligence gathering. Please let me help, but understand that my reaction is that things come across as very accusatory and unbalanced. Believe me, I am very aware of both improprieties and just plain incompetence in intelligence agencies, and they need to be brought out but in an encylopedic, not fragmentary and accusatory way. " +Academic Sources Can anyone find anything ever published by Erhard and solely written by him, in a peer reviewed academic journal. I can't find any anywhere. If I can't find them they don't exist but quite happy to be proven wrong. +, and so you surely do +Lighten up dude, I wasn't insinuating that you are a sock. I don't even know you. +" ASUE Hello, On, WP:ASUE, your username, as well as all other participants' names, have been moved under Inactive Participants. If you are still are an active member, please move your username to Active Participants. Thanks! <3 " +I don't want to reduce Democracy Now to a ghetto. I think they've done some good work. And I'm the one who has put the label 'political left' on them. +" In an interview with Comcast in 2007(most likely July), when Duff was artist of the month, she stated that ""Play With Fire"" wasn't really a single, she just felt like releasing it, and also because she felt like making a music video. The reason for a mainstream release was that she thought if she released it is a promo, it would chart. Unfortuanetly it didn't. With Love is the lead single from Dignity." +If the forums are considered content, you don't have to register to view them or anything else on the website. Even still, right now that is the number one place to get APB information and its a valuable link to add. +Hey, thanks! Trusilver, Thanks so much for the Pisses-Me-Off-But Barnstar! I'll keep it with pride! See, great minds don't think alike! And maybe this'll piss you off even more! Aim well! +" Speedy deletion of Parasyte Hosting A tag has been placed on Parasyte Hosting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. " +" Fiction vs non-fictiom It is clear from all the writing on this movie that there are documentary style inteviews (non-fictin) that go along with a fictional narrative. † " +" Luton Town F.C. infobox logo Ohh, the 1885. I forgot out it, I should replace it soon when i found one. Thanks. Blame it on me ! " +" I have finished adding the exit guide! (Finally!) There are many rough edges, but I wanted to get the basic information in. It is definitely ready for some cleaning and copyediting. I will work on this a little bit in the coming day, but I am more interested in adding a ""History"" section to this article. Thanks for your help! " +": Hi Sunray That is an interesting question. The article has had a ""peer review"" by several Deming scholars and consultants who were in Deming's inner circle. They like the article and had few suggestions on issues/problems of content. One is looking into several minor details and will report back to me. If we move sections of the article to sub articles it may help the article become a GA or FA but will make the article less educational because the sections we will move to sub articles are the most important for understanding Deming's philosophy. So the question is should we do that or leave it and polish areas of the article through copy editing? One Swedish Deming scholar intends to translate the article for Swedish Wikipedia and encouraged others to do the sane for their language versions. " +TS FAC - darn NCurse has pinged me twice in recent weeks about FACing TS. I don't want to FAC it, as I am convinced the vandalism will be uncontrollable forevermore, but if I don't FAC it, someone else will . Do you want to have one last look? (Talk) +What exactly is your problem? Jeff Leave it alone, grow up and get a life assclown. Put down your video game controller, and go outside once in a while and play real games with the other little boys in your neighborhood. +In fact, I find it a bit clunky) +" WP:COMMONNAME is about the title, which is NOT ""Orthodox Catholic Church,"" it is not about the lead. Hence, this article perfectly meets WP:COMMONNAME. The Church's official name is ""Orthodox Catholic Church."" This is supported by a number official documents of the Orthodox Church, as well as some (few, but some) secondary sources and plenty of tertiary sources. There is no need to ""de-emphasize,"" since there is no better place for the ""Official"" name than the lead. I will not repost sources, since a good look at the archives will provide sources (primary, secondary, tertiary) that states the official name. As for the ""Google search"" (although that type of arguments are not valid in Wikipedia discussions as you all know), here are several websites (I've only included ten since I don't have the whole day), all sharing the same sentence in one way or another ""The official designation of the church in its liturgical and canonical texts is “the Orthodox Catholic Church” (gr. catholicos = universal)."" - Orthodox Dioceses of Eastern Pensylvania - - Delmarva Orthodox Mission - - Holy Cross Greek Orthodox Church - - Holy Wisdom Orthodox Church - - Most Holy Mother of God (Orthodox ) Parish, which quotes Britannica - - Holy Ascencion Orthodox Church - - Info-Service - Serbian Orthodox Church - - St. Paul Greek Orthodox Church - . - Orthodox Christian Church in Thailand (Russian Patriarcate) - - (Orthodox Church oriented) bookstore - http://www.archangelsbooks.com/orthofaith.asp] If an WP:RSN is to be started, then there are plenty of references in this discussion page as well as many of its archives that support the accuracy of the ""Orthodox Catholic Church"" as the official name. They should also be taken into consideration, and not only the three encyclopedia entries. " +I'm not doing anything because there's no good drama in ANI to laugh at 207.80.142.5 +" Actually, brings up a good point; to clarify: No, the word ""cunt"" was not used as a personal attack against the blocking admin, but yes, it was used out of frustration to refer to •talk• " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  w +Please delete my account. Thank you. +Grow You thrice deleted an article I was beginning to build about a published author, stating that I could add various info, such as biographical detail. It may some day occur to you that this is what I was in the process of doing, except that your vandalism destroyed the article within a few moments of creation. I am new to Wikipedia, so perhaps there is a complaint mechanism for constraining your behavior that does not involve me deleting you, or your creations. +OK, I think I'm done tweaking it. I have an obligation Saturday during the day, so will probably kick it off after I get home. +" I found two conflicting arguments for this on Microsoft's very own website: ""Internet Explorer 3.0...PNG graphics""http://support.microsoft.com/kb/825461 and ""PNG output format requires Internet Explorer 4.0 or later""http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio/HP010501811033.aspx, yet there is no mention of PNG in the Internet_Explorer_3 article. I'm not sure what to believe. Time to install Multiple IE.http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE " +Intelligent Design Considering the only case the ADF appears to of been involved with was the Kitzmiller case in 2005, and their search results seem to indicate that this is their only internet-published involvement with ID, () does the ADF really count as a part of the Intelligent Design movement? That really seems like an increadibly minor contribution, and they don't appear to of done anything ID related outside of some involvement with Kitzmiller. +... Yeah, anything goes here. This is my talk-page and I could give less than a fuck about it. +Shove it, self-important moron. This site, curated by pretentious twats with inane biases, is useless as a research tool or living archive. People already sneer at wikipedia, distrust will only increase with wikipedia's growing detachment from reality and adherence to nonsensical bureaucratic procedures. The idiot GHCool, who is a simple propagandist, being defended by you is so utterly ridiculous as to defy belief. The very idea that all peoples contributions are equal is utterly insipid. Wikipedia is just one long pissing contest among people’s different biases and hangups. Are you also a member of the Israeli Hasbarah brigade, like GHCool? Sad. 24.224.214.165 +The above Statement is a personal attack on a user named Samuel and is still on the Samuel Talk page. I ask you to do something about it because I have no administrator rights. +" [unindent] This is semantics. A few grammar changes aside, can we all agree that the new intro is good and we will keep it? [review] " +Disambiguation How do I find the article for the Andrew J. Hinshaw that replaced John G. Schmitz in Congress ? The article doesn't seem to connect to California and borders on a vanity piece. +", 2 June 2007 (UTC) Detours The discussion above about RCOG's ""pro-choice position"" subsequently detoured to some other Wikipedia pages. For anyone interested in following along, the discussion first went to the talk page of KillerChihuahua. Then it went to the talk page of Bishonen. Then it went to the talk page of me, Ferrylodge. Then it went to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (ANI). Then it came back here. 08:53" +Just you try you fag. +" Use of caps in ""international Low Impact Docking System"" How can you say it's not a style error? Look at all the text in the table; every entry starts with a capital letter (sentence case), whether the first word is part of an acronym or not (""Original Soyuz probe and drogue docking system"", ""Modern Soyuz probe and drogue docking system"", ""Common Docking Adapter, future US vehicles"", etc.). So it should be ""International Low Impact Docking System"", regardless of whether ""international"" is part of the name. " +" Yes, when you're close friends. (Talk) " +Sorry to have bothered you... I found the info I was looking for. Thanks! (talk—) +" Ruby Removed a factual error about Ruby and what was pure speculation to attempt to explain this error. If anyone has actual evidence that her real name is Liza, and Ruby is a nickname because of her clothes and makeup, please provide it and revert my changes. Her grandmother calling her ""Liza"" while saying she looks like a drag queen doesn't make it her real name any more than it makes her grandmother's real name ""Norman Bates when he dressed as Norman Bates's mother.""" +File:2008 main page redesign proposal Kollision2.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008 main page redesign proposal Kollision2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +"I know its His signature ""trunk shot"" but I only mentioned Kill Bill because of the lighting, same shade of red. " +(or maybe just great, can't remember off hand) +where was the need to stop me and a friend having a quick laugh? +YOU WANT TO TRACK ME DOWN AHOLE? FEEL FREE TO WRITE ME, GIVE YOUR EMAIL AND I WILL MEET YOU JERK! +" Unblocked As per your email request, I have unblocked your account; as I said in the email, please make sure you read our policy on external links before adding links to more articles, as we have very strict rules on what can and can't be included. – scent " +"|Law Lord]] Discussion I prefer to act transparently. Can I give my views on that determination here? insignis I sent you an email message asking for your opinion. I think that is pretty transparent. That is fine with me, but some editors don't like it. It was a neutral invitation to a discussion, but it would be more open on a talk page - I did have the wikibreak sign up though. Thanks for the message though, I didn't notice the discussion start. insignis I wrote it in an email message when possible because those kinds of notification are not worth writing on user talk pages – since there is nothing to talk about. However, in two cases the users' had no email listed and in those cases I did write it on their talk page. See User_talk:Sarsaparilla#Review_of_deletion_of_page_User:Prester_John and User_talk:Christopher_Mann_McKay#User:Prester_John. I did not know that policy you linked to. Thanks for that. That is a good point, no reply is necessary. By the way, it is not a policy, rather a 'behavioural guideline' - I hope it is helpful. Regards, insignis Vandalism of my userpage Thanks for undoing that, though I admit the edit did amuse me. The guy was blocked 6 months ago for the exact same thing... some people really hold grudges. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/United Nations Parliamentary Assembly I wonder if you could spare a moment to review this article, please. Thank you, That is nice It reamins clear that there is historical debate as to whether he actually did ""fuck men"". So it can't so in the category until that histrocial debate is settled. And if you follow the link that I gave you will see that set out in black on white. hi do you now how i can get ahold of allison? never mind. Section Head Dispute (moved from Talk:James I of England) Lets not argue about and revert each other's section breaks, please. And it looks like you both just violated WP:3RR. This is just not important compared to the content, and may get this article protected or something else. We all had enough contentious editing in the past. Lets continue a civil debate and, who knows, maybe even come to consensus. Stranger things have happened. Thank you. — I agree. Though, for the record, I ""only"" undid the insertion of a section break above my post 3 times, no more. I am not sure how to further this discussion though. To me it seems the consensus is that James I quite obliviously was a person in the LGBT group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) No, for the record, you removed Section Break 6 today at 19:59 and then left your comment. Section breaks are for easy navigation on talk pages that have very long discussions such as this one. I spent my time cleaning up this talk page and breaking it down into section breaks over the last few days and you come along and muck it up just because you don't like where the section break is???? When I first placed it today, it was immediate following the last comment made by Lobojo. See if for yourself here. You came next and removed it and then inserted your comment after Lobojo's comment where the section break was. [[User talk:Allstarecho| +Note: table was compiled using Nevada State estimates from 2004 for population and Census 2000 for area and density +Yup! Of course I'm blocked! Because you bot assholes can't take the fact that you have no lives. You spend every minute of your life editing WP, and for what?! Organization? More like ORDER. +Just to let you know Missing Wikipedians You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. +Dude, I find you to be arrogant, obnoxious, overbearing, obsessive and basically a Wiki Nazi. YOU exhaust people away from this site, you have not turned anyone against Juice Plus because of your obvious bias against it. I really hope you die a very miserable lonely death tucked away in your garbage filled house. I picture you as a dirty, greasy, old ugly miserable little sad man with little to no life outside of wikipedia. I am willing to bet you haven't been laid in years, likely due to your very small penis. Thus the Cock referrence in your 'handle', you want to feel big somewhere, and since it isnt' in the real world, you have chosen to be a Wiki God. Good for you. Well done. When you die, and hopefully the news will get out about who died on the same day you quit editing ( my money is on Dr. Barrett for your identity), no one is going to miss the wonderful Wiki editor who kept the world safe from fruits and vegetables. I doubt more than your mother, father and siblings will show up at your funeral,likely your siblings wont' because you probably bug the shit out of them too. When you take in your last breathe Red, are you going to be happy about the thousands of hours you spent here at Wiki railing against Juice Plus? is that going to be the measure of your life's work? Honestly, isn't there something in life you could be doing other than this obsession? Isn't there someone you could be talking to for help, for some companionship,or have you driven them all away by your obnoxious overbearing arrogant opinionated jerk peronality? I hope this gets me banned, as I have a life to get back to now, but this great post will live on, life on line for ever and serve as a ass slapping to the biggest pain in the ass ever! Is there a barnstorming award for that? you win it!! you are a complete and total jerk off. Dont bother posting on my talk page, warning me or thinking I give a shit about getting kicked off of WIKI...oh?! what will I possibly find to do in life?!the all knowing +" You do seem to be rather an impetuous person Coffee; I expect you'll grow out of it. (talk) " +Proposed clarification of no legal threats policy Jimbo, I have posted a proposal to clarify the scope of the no legal threats policy. I would be grateful for feedback and comments on this. +Could you remove the protection? There is no basis for the protection and given one admin just put it there, I don't see why one can't remove it. I of course support the move. I've also complained about the moving venue to the closer of the AfD. +}} {{helpme|Yes I was blocked, but give me back my stylesheet at least +Current Sources I was I who blanked that last paragraph because it just does not make any sense. (I had forgotten to log in). I dont know what the writer is trying to say here do you?? +" Hi Malik, Standing up to racism and bullying is not a ""hole"" neither is a wikipedia account. I have Radh accusing me of being a ""Stalinist"" on many places on wikipedia while he follows me from article to article. I hate Stalin. He has some vested interest in ""exposing Communism"" and we are all supposed agree with his povs. User:Itsmejudith defended Radh's usage of Robeson as a good ""Uncle Tom"" under the conniving guise of ""context"" and ""Robeson being dead."" She ignored his nasty ""Neo-Stalinist bully"" comment(s) (as you predictably did ) and defended him again. I ran this all by a PHD student at CAL. That's racism, that's a slur(s) and that's reality. If I had used ""nigger"" or ""Uncle Tom?"" Oh my! You'd have blocked me instantaneously. Radh should have been blocked by now as well. Whatever, I'm not going to stop editing on this website in any capacity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive658#User:_Catherine_Huebscher http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Radh#Talk:Paul_Robeson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Peekskill_Riots#Recent_Revisions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Radh#Paul_Robeson_2 8:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)" +its amazing to yo momma +" {{unblock|Romanian operator adijapan does not accept a native ethimologie of Macedon-armans, aromanians. He delete bibiography, external links and a native name at section ""native name""}} ( )" +Last time I have double checked, Wikipedia was still encyklopedia. Which means, there is no room for personal judgements of wikipedists about the topics. There are informations out there and you must not ignore them. +" ""Hateful propaganda?"" What alternate fucking universe do you live in? We're not going to have an article about a territorial dispute which just repeats the claims of one government involved in the dispute. That's preposterous. Calling that stance ""hateful propaganda"" is asinine. " +" Darry, Darry, Darry. Watched both programmes AND read both books? I feel for you mate. Why put yourself through the agony - especially of the books... Seems to me that only something beginning with ""www.bbc.co.uk"" carries any weight on this site as a 'source', and theyre not about to go and ut out op-eds criticising the boorish Boorman and the whiney Mcgregor. You must know what I'm saying has more than a ring of truth - especially the laughable Davidhoff Cool Water campaign that McGregor cashed in with. I hope so otherwise you've had the wool well and truly pulled over your eyes.. How about this as a source - Amazon Reviews! How about the amazon real name reviews " +About English: Some of your complaints have been fixed. Other examples are idiomatic to mathematics writing, and hence may not be fixed. About jargon: Mathematics, like any highly technical field, has its own jargon, which does not appear in non-mathematical dictionaries. Part of the function of Wikipedia is to explain and exemplify jargon for readers, so that they can understand other texts that use such jargon. About difficulty: This is a common complaint about mathematics articles on Wikipedia. (See FAQ at the top of the project talk page here.) This Projective plane article is not a bad offender, in comparison to many other articles. It attempts to give visual intuition, historical context, applications, etc. The later parts of the article are more obscure, but only highly motivated readers will attempt those anyway. Fundamentally, this is an article about a moderately advanced mathematical topic, that few non-mathematical laymen ever encounter. So the difficulty seems about right to me. Yes, there is always room for small improvements, but no dramatic change in tone, organization, content, etc. is warranted. +Why not admit it? The only reason you disagree with anything is because you are an obsessed troll, whose sole agenda is causing discord. +I just did a geolocate. Having your friends do something for you is meatpuppet! 24.239.153.58 +. Also how can Albania have only 18 peaces of artillery when they purchased 100 peaces from USA in 2004? I’am sorry I will keep changing this miss information you are posting +Thanks Thanks for the barnstar. It was much appreciated. +Columbian Exchange I Ben, I liked your article on the Columbian Exchange. I added a few sentences on diseases, a chart, and an external source. I hope you will approve. 04:00, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) +" The previous comment of the article states that MOC was not re-established in 1993, which is a fallacy. The MOC has been legally registered in Montenegro in line with the valid legal system of the state of Montenegro and in line with the laws in Montenegro - which is clearly apparent from the MOC page on Wikipedia. The MOC Church is called the Montenegrin Orthodox Church in its formal registration in Montenegro, so there is no space for speculation here. The Church was re-established after a separate existence until 1920 and a ban by the Serbian (then Yugoslav) autocratic King Aleksandar. The article does not claim that MOC is a major branch of Eastern Orthodoxy outside Montenegro. The statement ""over 74% of Montenegrins are Eastern Orthodox Christians, most of whom belong to the Serb Orthodox Church"" is anyway a fallacy, as there is no accurate census that can prove this. One may say truthfully say that ""most Montenegrins are Eastern Orthodox Christians, most of whom belong to the Serb Orthodox Church"", but a large number of Montenegrins are atheists, agnostics, or otherwise, myself included. Being a Montenegrin does not mean that you are part of the 74% of Eastern Orthodox Christians. Sorry, this is the 21st century. You can not just delete the fact that MOC followers claim that ""all of the existing churches in Montenegro were once part of an autonomous Montenegrin Orthodox Church that was abolished following the union with Serbia in 1918."" This is the explanation why shrines are not being built en masse in Montenegro by the MOC, as it claims to inherit the churches currently in the hands of SOC. If we put only one viewpoint in ""its following is small to the point of non-existence and it has not been recognised by any other Orthodox Church"" it is not balanced. Also, the statement ""its following is small to the point of non-existence"" needs to be based on fact not fancy. Do you have an official census of followers or is this your speculation? - user 20:28, 04 Oct 2005 (UTC). " +Sounds good. -) I'd try talking them through various different approaches - obviously, content partnerships (with examples of pre-existing ones), but also things like us helping them with digitization of particularly important works (and/or proofreading for texts), Wikipedian in Residence, Backstage Pass-style events, putting curators in contact with wikipedia editors and generally sharing knowledge, getting them using Wikipedia content/links on their website/in their displays, etc. Don't focus too narrowly on one of these to start with, but see what they are interested in initially and then press on with that. Let me know if you need any 'official' representation or other support from WMUK, e.g. if you want me to come talk to them with you, if there is content that needs uploading in bulk, or agreements signing, etc. Also, if you need any financial support at any point, let us know - if under £100 then via the microgrants process, or if over then get in touch. Basically, if there's anything we can do to help, let us know. ;-) Good luck! +Fish Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. +" Firstly, Please sign your name with ~~~~. Secondly, If the information is indeed wrong then please explain why and how in your edit summary so that people don't think it's vandalism. I won't revert your edits but take this as a fair warning for the future on how to make proper edits that don't result in reverts due to perceived vandalism. Also please cite sources for all assertions you make so that they can be verified, I'm not a linguist so I can't argue that and I'll leave your edits as they are. (talk) " +Frankly I dont have the time nor the inclination to sit and argue with you! If you do ...well... why dont you just go and screw urself!! +" I'll ask you for articles next time. And I've made some adjustments in your given signature suggestion, your was ""242 bytes"" and after adjustments it is ""326 bytes"". My old signature was ""475 bytes"" so it's good now. So what do you think now? I want to use Assassin default font style in my signature ). «T ♦ C ♦ » " +The same editor made the change again, but this time included an edit summary. I agree with the change. +Dragović and Bakić Hi I am looking for some information on Z.Dragović and Bakić that wrote Code of Law in 1914... Do you have more information on these people? What positions did they hold? Where were they from? Where can I get some info about them? (I am particularly interested abut Dragović). Thanks! 217.153.207.18 +86.10.231.219 blocking You blocked the above user. Can you supply the page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, you mentioned? I am curious about these sort of trangressions, and was observing his actions, so would like to see the examples. Thanks. +While its true that she has been spouting off quite unacceptably in the AfDs for The UKA Press and Eleanor Leonne Bennett, more than one editor (including me) has called her on it and no one takes her accusations seriously. Unfortunately, it often goes with the territory when COI editors find their articles up for deletion. I've been on the receiving end more than once e.g. , . Sometimes it's best just to give a brief rebuttal, reiterate that personal attacks are not acceptable and leave it at that. Lengthy responses tend to encourage yet more vitriol from them. Her editing of your user drafts, is also unacceptable and I'll also have a word with her about it. I'm not an admin, but it might help. +" Because I am a student attending the school, I feel, nay, I KNOW that the St. Mikes rivalry is an important aspect of the school atmosphere. I've been there, I was even AT that Casino Royal showing where Rudda started the school cheer. While I didn't write this rivalries section, I feel that it is relevant to the article, and should be allowed to stay. I am not attempting to ""spam"" by continuing to repost the section, indeed, I continue to do so because I care about my school. I actually GO to Del, do you? No, don't think so. At best, I'd have to say that you are some washed up alumnus with nothing better to do than to complain about how your old school's precious, precious Wikipedia article isn't exactly the way you want it. Del has made it perfectly clear that they don't even like Wikipedia, why must we argue about it so? There is no reason. Please do not undo the next edit. Thank you. " +April 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing. (talk / cont) +Im still awaiting a reply to my contribution. Please reply setting out reasons for what seems to have been a deletion-without-discussion. Please keep Wikipedia an open free and fairly moderated resource for all notable contributions. +Okay, I'll get that evidence. I'm getting in touch with Capella himself, and I'll prove his role, one way or the other. +Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Gary L. North. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +|listas= Voice of the Philippines (season 1), The +Move protection A move protection for this page would be nice. In the last 24 hours this page was moved twice without discussion and the result of a previous discussion (see above) was not to move that page. +your fucking face. faggots +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/La_goutte_de_pluie #::What a liar, La goutte de pluie. You wikistalked over to Ong Teng Cheong page right after i made an edit on the section in Tan Kin Lian regarding Ong Teng Cheong. You knew how the former president page is getting all the visits this election so you deliberately start working on criticism on Tony Tan into Ong Teng Cheong's page. It was covered in Talk that your edit on the strike is too long. You just dumped one whole chunk of information into the page and expect it to make sense?202.156.13.232 +I'm guessing that had a frustrated tone behind it. This is an article that I want to one day achieve FA status, and if you are absolutely sure that your version of the plot will be able to satisfy the conditions, then I'm fine with it. You're the one with more experience, and so, I'll trust you on this. I may try to provide some copy editing here and there, but for now feel free to revert it back to the way you desire. Let's see where this'll go. - +G7 Why isn't G7 applicable on Owen Toon? Who has added substantial content to the article besides myself? - +Three months? What for? +The internet, as a whole, is less biased than any other source of information. If we can keep the Cabal from controlling content, and allow all of those disparate opinions to act as filtering agents for the article, it will enable a single Wikipedia page to be as informative and balanced as researching all of the Google results on a subject. 18px|Wikipedians for self-rule +It only happened once, right? Maybe if we ignore it it will go away. Gimmetrow +" From the VP thread, perhaps you didn't see MZMcBride, it has been suggested that you were the ""person running the site."" Do you know why people would say that? If it was not you, could you tell us who it was? Feel free to email . I, for one, would appreciate candor. Luke " +New unblock appeal Starting a new section here for a new unblock appeal, as this user e-mailed me asking me to take a look at this. The initial e-mail was back in February 2010 (at the time of the SPI case) and nothing was done then, but the user e-mailed again recently (August 2010) and I'd like to try and sort this out. As far as I can tell, the declines of the unblock appeals above did not consider whether the initial identification as a sock was correct or not, so I've invited the SPI clerk at the time and blocking admin (MuZemike) and another admin (Future Perfect at Sunrise) here to comment. I believe 2007apm can still edit his talk page, so he should comment here as well to state his case, and I will reply to his e-mail telling him to do so. +" SPLC's views Why is it that a group, the Southern Poverty Law Center here, is the final arbiter of what is or is not a ""hate group""?" +Hi hey i understand the reasons for you talking about my page, C*itadel. but i dont know how to delete it....please help me +" Talk:Revenue Tariff Party Should have discussed first. A reliable source though. | Talk " +"I defy you == To find anything that shows I've harassed anybody, anywhere. I am holding legitimate discussion with people just like any of you, explaining matters and situations. Since when did ""disagreeing"" give anyone grounds to threaten a ban? Look at the facts. Don't fall bias to the registered user just because they're registered. It's so obvious that's what's going on here, from the start. Wait, now is THIS post going to be smeared as ""disruptive"", too? Unreal. 74.56.51.128 == " +You can see the discussion that led to the article's deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audley Retirement. The concerns were both the tone of the article and the fact that notability was not demonstrated. The relevant notability guideline is Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). You would need to be able to satisfy the conditions described there, i.e. demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The article, before it was deleted, cited a few local news stories, but these are often not sufficient to satisfy the guideline. If you can identify coverage that would satisfy this guideline, let me know and I can restore the article for you to work on. +YO I HATE YOU Salvio YOU SUCK I HATE YOU A-HOLE +You are being extremely petty. You are not following the process. You didn't read the talk page before demanding that I use it, did you? 2.220.204.70 +" What I meant was that regardless of the time taken, if a given protein transports the same amount in either direction (say, 1 glucose) and the transport protein cannot change its cofiguration back without transporting in the reverse direction, how can concentration on either side ever change? Ex. I have 10 particles outside, 5 inside, and 1 protein, whenever 1 goes in, this changes to 9 outside, 6 inside, but can never get to 8 outside, 7 inside because the protein's substrate binding spot is now inside, which means it cannot bind a new particle from the outside without first transporting a molecule from the inside back out, turning it back to 10 out, 5 in. clawx " +" ...this includes the online variations. ((⊕)) " +I second that. Superracist shit, as if black haven't created a thing, evthing has been created by white. With no a reference btw. +" I respect your judgement. I do not intend to contest the block you have imposed on me. But please do remark on ""this may not be the place for you to edit."" ""you are now wasting the time of multiple people."" Are these not personal attacks, deviating from a civil debate ? Are these worthy of a certified admin ? It is also amazing that you and everyone is consistently ignoring the fact that Mr. Spaceman keeps bringing false and misleading allegations, which have been exposed on that page. Does no one here have the honesty and the guts to speak against an him, especially when there blatant lies have been completely laid bare ? I hope, for the sake of Wikipedia, that someone with an alive conscience would respond to these issues. " +Cease and desist your anti-Zionist bigotry, or I will report you to the authorities. +Talk:Morikami park More comments. Thanks -vertigo +" I think the party's been around (though unregistered) since the middle of last year, so I wasn't sure if any of them had stood as independents at the state elections or anything. If this is their first election, it's probably only worth mentioning if it gets brought up elsewhere. IgnorantArmies (talk) " +No idea. But I think the unauthenticated votes casted by both sides have by now to be indented out. Not removed since someone may authenticate them later but indented to be excluded in counting. +Vandalism etc report against User:Signalhead I'm not sure why it was incorretly made but I reproduce it here as requested. I wish to make an allegation of persistent Vandalism against the owner of the account ‘Signalhead’ for repeated vandalism of articles, to which: deletion of material edited into those articles which Signalhead disagrees with their being there, such contributions being legitimate edits and not vandalism in themselves (other than Signalhead unilaterally deciding that he doesn't want them there). The articles in question are on a railway subject matter and it is clear that Signalhead has unilleterally appointed himself as an ‘expert’ who has decided to ‘own’ the articles and persistently arbitrates on what material may or may not be edited into the article. I refer in particular to three articles, 'Home Signal'; ‘Token (Railway Signalling)’ and ‘Signal Passed at Danger’ (And I must thank Signalhead himself for providing the evidence of that last article where he tried to use a claimed erroneous edit as evidence of a false claim of sockpupetry – it has become clear that another contributor (or even contributors) feel the same way I do). Whenever edits are made to those articles, Signalhead has often just deleted (vandalism:blanking) the edit claiming the information is just wrong or ‘erroneous’ without permitting any discussion on the point. Further the blanking takes place anything from a few minutes to a few hours which clearly demonstrates that Signalhead is watching the articles to make sure that no ‘unsuitable’ material is placed there and to ensure that he can delete any material which he believes is incorrect. This demonstrates an arrogant ‘know it all’ attitude to other Wikipedia contributors and is, against the principles on which Wikipedia is based. This unacceptable behaviour brings wikipedia into disrepute by discouraging legitimate contributors from actually contributing to the content of articles. For my own part, I specifically refer to Signalhead’s blanking of an edit at 16:44 on the 15th September to article ‘Token (railway signalling)’, with an edit summary of ‘Removed Erroneous comments …’ because he thinks he knows better (vandalised within 4 hours). Signalhead also vandalised the article ‘Home Signal’ at 11:42 27th October 2007 when he blanked an edit from another contributor in the article with the familiar ‘Reverted erroneous edit’ justification, within 3 hours of the contribution, again because he claimed to know better. I reverted this blanking when I added an illustration that supported the blanked text. However, Signalhead just vandalised the article again by blanking the edit at 17:07 on the 27th October 2007 with a ‘Reverted to earlier and better version’ justification, less than 2 hours after the restoration. Signalhead did add something to the article discussion page, but regardless of that he had no right to just blank the contribution no matter how much of an authority he thinks he may be on the subject matter. He should have discussed the matter first and then the article should have been adjusted by consensus. I note that another contributor has also expressed exasperation with Signalhead's persistent blanking and adjudication of article content in a somewhat more unorthadox manner. I offer the short times between contribution and blanking and the blanking itself as evidence that Signalhead is watching ‘his’ articles and deleting any ‘unsuitable’ (in his eyes) content. With Signalhead’s apparent familiarity of finding his way around Wikipedia, I find it hard to believe that he is unaware of the rules. I must therefore insist that Signalhead’s editing rights be permanently revoked for the following reasons. 1.TABPersistent blanking of other contributors edits which constitutes persistent vandalism. 2.TABArroganct contempt towards other Wikipedia contributors by adopting an attitude that he knows better than everyone else (which is a clear abuse of those contributors). Even to the extent of making false allegations to detract from his own violation of the rules. 3.TABAdopting a self appointed role of deciding what can and can’t be contributed to articles which he has decided to ‘own’ and thus … 4.TABActing in a manner to bring Wikipedia into disrepute. +" That IP is not in my range, and I don't know who it is, but he/she certainly doesn't seem to like either one of us. — | talk To admins watching Oops! I also got myself auto-blocked, which was a mistake because I had meant to click on the history page of Kelly Clarkson, but hit the little ""+"" sign instead. My fault! I was not trying to evade the block. — | talk " +"Lifestyle section in this article contained a biased link to a widely discredited (but very popular in yellow journalism, and paleo fad diet circles) meta-analysis which claims to contradict scientific consensus on saturated fat. I added the rebuttal and noted the current scientific consensus, the lipid hypothesis which contains a controversy section with the same meta-analysis and rebuttal (neither the controversial meta-analysis NOR the refutation really belong on this page OR that one, but if the meta-analysis link is going to be here the refutation needs to be as well). If you doubt the scientific consensus, the page on the Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease controversy is already well written and covers the ""controversy"" well. Any rejection of scientific and medical consensus should really be kept there, rather than spread across Wikipedia (Cholesterol skepticism, not unlike the similar anti-vaccination position, is not credible and poses a public health risk when it results in misinformation). I also clarified the point about Cholesterol, regarding hyper-responders, and included a link (if anybody has a better link or can go into more detail for readers, that might be good). People shouldn't be getting health advice from wikipedia to begin with, but this page still needs to contain responsible information. As with vaccines, listen to your doctor and you'll do fine. " +That would be good. Btw, has reverted the Elvis Presley article 6 times today ( November 3rd ). I can no longer revert him, because I've already reverted 3 times in the last 24 hours. ( ) +" Gerund leads to ambiguity ""prefect…acting as a liaison and facilitating the implementation of National Development Plans and governing programmes at local level."" So, does the prefect govern programmes at a local level? Or does the prefect facilitate governing pogrammes at a local level? - | Talk " +" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) . I'm not sure I get your point. Readers of Wikipedia aren't required to be familiar with all of its policies and guidelines, and so it can't be assumed that they will know about the notability requirements, which are in fact only a guideline. Moreover, there are plenty of organizations which don't go out of their way to publicize themselves yet are still notable, and aggrandizing connotates way more than just publicity. Including 'self-aggrandizing' doesn't at all suggest that that's their primary motive. As well, there could be notable trolls or notable trolling groups who don't self-aggrandize, and certainly not to the extent and in the joie de vire manner the GNAA does. Indeed, many trolling groups and individuals try to obscure or hide the fact that they're trolls, which often makes their activities more successful. Therefore, phrase is clearly relevant and not POV. " +I never want to contribute for the articles, which bad users spoil. Premier League and Bundesliga are false pages today, but I don't care anymore. I'm so tired to contribute for. It's total waste of time. 18:35, 11 +So what? Terrorist attacks in Iran carried out Wahabists are terrorist attacks on people of Iran, that's how they're related. Don't remove the category. +Susana A. Herrera Quezada I have withdrawn the nomination for the ariticle. Thanks for translating the article and saving it in the nick of time. Keep up the good work. Peace! +" I see no reason to assume (and state) that the two are one in the same and I see no reason to over-simplify NOM as ""anti-gay"" rather than stating the fact that they oppose gay marriage. It serves no purpose for us to be vague or to make values judgments and to claim them as fact. - " +Sorry about falling through on the review Sorry about falling through on the review. I replied to your email, but I saw somewhere else that you didn't get it so I thought I would leave a comment. Over the past several months I have been trying to reengage with Wikipedia, but its been emotionally hard to reengage. Sorry about any trouble that I caused, apparantly I am not ready to take on long term projects on wiki. Again, very sorry, I have had people fall through on me before on wiki as well, and I know it isn't fun P +Re Conditional support of BLP AfD change I didn't like the wording of the proposal on WT:BLP per se. I support, however the wording put forth by Doc on his essay. The former is too grey and misleading to achieve its intended purpose without causing collateral damage, while the latter is a lot better. Based on how deletion debates have gone in the past, I foresee several potential problems with the former wording without any additional qualifiers. - Best regards, +Look... ...if you and Schmuckola want to follow me around, I guess I can't stop you. Whatever. Have your fun. I'm done with both of you. +Likely, this is some misguided 13 year old who uses huggle too much. I noticed that you are being template spammed, too. Ugh! Have these new editors no respect for one of the original Wikipedia 200? +Yes, understood, but the fifth pillar reminds us that the spirit of the rule trumps the letter of the rule. However I'm embarrassed that I have taken up your time like this and I shall be more thoughtful in future. +Esperanza I've changed the wording slightly; it's still possible WP editors might be interested in Esperanza, and as such might go to the talk page. +of one of the most reputed Universities in India and the world +Notability A tag has been placed on your articles Steve bellavia and Bob groves, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the articles seem to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Steve bellavia and/orBob groves are really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on the articles' talk pages (Talk:Steve bellavia and Talk:Bob groves). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources in order that your article will be verifiable. | Talk +" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Luminous efficacy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (speak to me) " +Mary Poppins Should Be There Before I begin I would like to say that I am searching for citation that is needed for Aladdin to be included in the list. Anyway I believe Mary Poppins should be in it's list because it's like Beauty and the Beast, the only one under its genre to be nominated for Best Picture in the Academy Awards, its genre is human actors interacting with cartoon characters, yes the interaction was only like for 15 minutes but still they interacted with cartoon characters and puts it in the same genre as Who Framed Rogerr Rabit or Space Jam. +Because Pulse is in need of its own article, as it is not a related to Heat at all such as Rush and Elixer. A page will be made in time, please be patient. +I think social housing is better explained under subsidized housing, which incorporates several different versions/methods including Public Housing. Please respond at the talk page. +" Call Sign Meaning I've been adding WISconsiN as a call sign meaning for quite some time now only to have it deleted by another user who INSISTS that the only possible meaning for the calls is the defunct WISconsin News newspaper. As far as I know, there is no official documentation or credible source that states that the calls are a reference to the newpaper and the newspaper ALONE. So who's to say the calls weren't also chosen because it was an abbreviation of the state's name? There's plenty of examples of a station using calls with multiple meanings (such as WBBM-TV out of Chicago). But my main sticking point is that WISN has referenced the calls while advertising itself as ""WISconsiN TV"" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JFirQUXfc8) My theory is that the station chose to keep the calls after the newspaper folded because they referenced the state's name as well (the station had only been using the calls for a few years when the paper folded, so the ""name recognition"" argument is moot). But regardless of why they kept the calls, I think the fact that the station made a conscious decision to use them to brand itself as ""Wisconsin TV"" deserves mention. " +It would definitely help if editors avoid displaying names other than their usernames. Tony Sidaway +" I take your point that it is over simplifying but it is something that should be mentioned can you think of another way it could be put into the article without a whole paragraph trying to explain it? Talk " +" Take Swift Stern Action against this guy Hi Sue, Long time. How are you? I visit wikipedia only occasionally these days. I just came across this: I think you should give Crossmr a stern warning of NPA and CIVIL on his talk page and I think you should remove that despicable PA and uncivil comment(check out the heading/edit of the comment /edit summary /etc.) from royaa's talk page. Or let me know if I should personally give him that warning and remove that despicable comment myself. I would be happy to do that. Thanks. It seems that Crossmr is acting with a malicious instigative agenda. He keeps rambling on about old things and keeps repeating himself (and his instigations) about them. It seems that he is unable to move on, and let peace reign, and is hung up on old already-settled bloated issues, not to mention non-issues. He seems to want to live in the past. And to think that this guy goes around placing warnings of CIVIL and NPA on other user's talk pages. Talk about missing the plank for the speck. Tsk tsk. LOL. He should pay attention to his own Block Log and history!!!!! lol. He also needs to learn properly about AGF and pipe down. His ill-intended comments are obviously malicious and deliberately provocative. But instead of me being provoked, he only serves to amuse me. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. But it has to be made clear to him that his uncivil rants are totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated. I think coming from an admin will make him, a general user, understand better. Thanks and regards. ) PS. If first time newbie issues like first time misinformed ""vandalism"" are brought up, especially from their IPs, almost everyone on wiki would be ""old vandals"" because almost no one is expected to know wiki rules when they start editing on a whim via google one fine day. HAHAHAHAHA. BITE, AGF etc. Also was looking to merge those accounts and attribution etc. but never really got around to doing it. Though I think I had already mentioned it on one of the accounts user pages and also the edit histories and everything else is so very obvious! I had MYSELF mentioned that those are my accounts in my comments! Not to mention the archive! lol. Seriously, AGF in underlined bold for some people. LOLOL." +Dilpazier Aslam I would think you have enough on your plate to deal with as it is, considering the number of users who are angry with you over your edits to Anti-Judaism, but if you really wish to report me, I will not try to convince you otherwise. I think you may be interested in voting on the AFD for Dilpazier Aslam. I would be curious to see which way you vote. I am also curious as to what you are reporting me for but I guess time will tell. +On the basis of what you wrote in the image description page, I added the tag , as that seems to convey your intent. You may want to double-check what that license says to make sure you're OK with it. (t • c) +(Incidentally - how's this for serendipity? - I'm editing whilst listening to a CD of choral and organ music by Sumsion and others! Just coming to the end of his prelude on Down Ampney.) Talk +Alex's nomination Listen, Irpen. Looking at your contributions to Alex's nomination and its talk page, you are making just as much circus there as Bonaparte. Relax a bit; Alex is bound to pass, based on the votes. No need to make matters worse by making the whole thing look like a fight between Russians and anti-Russians. Keep your cool, take it easy, and all will be fine. +"Saying you answered the question when you didn't is not the work of a ""good editor"". Please answer it here: If they were not walking out of the Ard-Fheis, as described by JBB, what were they walking out of? " +" Try reading the US Census Bureau or the CIA factbook entry. Both say, income inequality is rising! I am not the one nit-picking through articles to back up a conervative agenda-I am the one trying to quote the CIA factbook-hardly OR. I have started an RfC-let's get some other users involved! " +REDIRECT Talk:Dulhasti Hydroelectric Plant +Dictionary of National Biography and copyright issues Another one of these (I raised the matter on the Copyright Problems page a little while ago, and you added a reply) is Alexander Ludovic Duff. The biography from the DNB was published 1949, so the template is again misleading; this was again created by +" """"the generally accepted cause of the death of Adolf Hitler,..."" is not mentioned in two different versions of the article you and I were editing you put in ""The 1992 opening of records kept by the Soviet KGB and Russian FSB conflicted with the widely accepted version of Hitler's death as described by Hugh Trevor-Roper "" (my bolding) which replaced the former word confirmed. With an explanation on the talk page I changed it to ""largely confirmed"". It is important to mention that most people thought Hitler had killed himself in the bunker long before the Russian archives were opened (for example The World at War episode ""21. Nemesis: Germany (February – May 1945)"" and that events were reported in most English language histories as TR described them, and that his escape was by the middle 50's thought to be very unlikely by most people, although a favourite parlour game (which used to be included in this article) was to say ""if Hitler had survived he would be insert age"". I added the sentence with cadaver to the article back in May 2006, one of the advantages of using the word cadaver was that as a summary of a source I used it removed any possibility that it was [[wp:plagiarism|plagiarism], and another advantage is it is accurate. However although I prefer the word cadaver in this sentence if there was a consensus to change it to corpse I would not object. " +No probs, aren't we all! I think your comments have it the nail on the head. There is indeed a pattern related to that particular editor and the contributions to the said pages. Such a contrast between them isn't there? This is where the problem lies, and it seems we are in agreement. Unfortunately, while I take your points on board as will others, I think one those involved will not. +Regarding edits made during December 10 2008 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Category:French World War I infantry guns page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. +2011 Libyan civil war +DYK for cognitive vulnerability Greetings I added a template of nomination for cognitive vulnerability. I saw your posting on it. Did you hear anything back from the ping you sent off as stated in your typed message? Thanks +Why are you so utterly condescending towards people who don't share your obsession with crucifixion in Japanese animation? As far as I can tell, the deleted section is pretty much only in this article because of your repeated insistence. One determined editor does not a consensus make. +Someday someone will understand who's right and who's left. EOD. +Actual Facts The statement that when apprehended, he was standing in the middle of the street, 'staring at the sky', is false, and was put into the police report merely for decorum. One of the arresting officers told me the guy was singing the song 'Never Gonna Give You Up' out loud when they cuffed him. Later, the other officer (the one who wrote the report) confirmed this to me personally. He decided against including this in the report since he didn't think it was all that relevant and he didn't want to get in trouble with his supervising officer over what might be construed as a joke in bad taste (apparently he and his supervisor didn't get along). I know that by now they must have told this to many other people (it was already an 'open secret'). Both agents have since relocated, so i guess many more people may know about this by now. So if anyone out there has also heard this version, please say so. Note that merely adding this to the article will earn you an immediate and relentless accusation of vandalism, so it's probably best to comment here first. Unless you can provide 'reliable sources' (can't see how), or you also happen to be one of those trigger-happy admins who gets off on blocking other people (In which case i guess you'll be split between adding an unsourced statement to the article and blocking yourself. My suggestion: Do both, in the proper order.). +" Memorable quote From rationale for deletion by nominator: ""If this guy is such a pillar of the Empire, why is he just now getting an article?""" +Thank you for experimenting with the page Chalastra on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +F*CK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON SINGULARITY42 YOU ASS*HOLE! 67.218.41.166 +":::::::ZayZayEM, the Bible and the Epic of Gilgamesh are the *only* ancient records on Noah's Ark. Of these two, the vast majority of belief is based on the Bible. The Qur'an story is similar. It is not undue weight using the Bible as the majority source for this article. nixon " +Hahahaha. WIE?! WIE?!!!!!! That is retarded. Internet Explorer was already long enough compared to say, Opera, Safari, or Firefox. Now it's Windows Internet Explorer? This browser goes down the shitter more every day. +" Disputed fair use rationale for Image:THP8.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:THP8.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ""fair use"" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +" Speedy deletion of Mahur,Malie and Masahet. A tag has been placed on Mahur,Malie and Masahet. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +(UTC) So, official wikipedia's doxa is that RS'homosexuality is a calomny ??? 15:02, 15 May 2014 +Re:Re: You How long have you been an administrator +Photo Only the artist should appear in the main photo. A photo of her and a fan can be placed further down but the main picture should be just her. It can be a bit confusing at first sight. New picture please. +" No, I'm not supposedly Lance Cade. I AM LANCE CADE! I've mass hatred not for Wikipedia, but for the morons who I guess can just site anything they dream up and it comes across as the actual truth. I'm starting to read these fools and how upset they get by people deleting ""work"" of theirs!! Making up lies IS NOT work! I can only imagine how many other peoples sites have just bogus info on it. Awww, the lovely internet!! I wish my site was deleted completely because it is just one wrong fact after another. And there is actually a link to donate to this shit hole of a site!! I'll donate the casket if we can kill Wikipedia!" +"==In response to your feedback== I suggest visiting the Image tutorial  " +DONT MIND ME. may be Igbo(12%) is not a majority. Na joke O. Half of the population of Nigeria are either Yoruba or Hausa. +" The Albanian Barnstar of National Merit For your great intrest and work on the Albanian History, keep on the work! this WikiAward was given to Antidiskriminator by on " +Some people belive that the number of the beast refers to callum mccarthy as the anti-christ +To clarify, my revert of the image & caption was because it emphasizes a supporting actor and the reception to their performance (WP:UNDUE). Meanwhile, I'd added div col to decrease white space. +Have commented at the Peer review page. +get deskana and kojji to bash me too so i can have a complete set User:Big foot123456789 +I have begun to split up this article; I moved several of the timelines together into United States Involvement in the Vietnam War, and moved the section on Vietnamization into it's own article. I'm still in the middle of summarizing it, so don't worry that some stuff is missing. +Taking Cwobeel's, daredevil's, and my comment above, the consensus is 3 to 2 for inclusion. I'm adding it back. +would you still consider this article biased/??? what date can i go back to in its pg history to see a relatively unbiased article? +It's a secret character, it's not like we're presenting two equal characters, like we would if we were writing of the original Super Mario Bros. - (talk) +Mangroves Forests are a Terrestrial Biome because Forests are Terrestrial Biomes, as in the WWF classification. +I have made a contribution to the analysis section of your theory. I hope I have done so in the spirit in which it was intended. If you dislike my analysis, feel free to remove it. Also, I left two comments on the Langan talk page relating to the IQ testing issue, in response to your comments and edits (your edits seem positive to me). +Apparently Timothy Usher's ambition is to create shrines in memory of my name in every talk page.I'll assist in any way I can. And I'm not an anti-semite.I love Arabs. +" Well, let's see. I've never been employed by Saddleback and I haven't given a cent to Warren or other ""apologists."" Does that answer your questions? The point is, obviously everyone has biases. However, I'm not an activist and don't go around editing article's of people I disagree with like you and those like you insist on doing. There's a clear double-standard. Unlike some editors, I don't allow my bias to affect my edits - I simply list verifiable facts from a neutral perspective, which is what Wikipedia editors are supposed to do. " +Try replacing the trilobite, it might look better. As for the portal, hmmm. Not really sure. Don't suppose it would be possible to place it between the intro and the two lower boxes (selected article and selected picutre)? +P.S. What are you calling nonsense??????? +... it is inconsistent and it is a known Islamofascist tactic +OKAY ) SORRY I WON'T DO IT AGAIN!!!! IT'S JUST THAT THIS IP ADDRESS IS USED BY SO MANY PEOPLE!!!! THERE MUST BE SNEAKY VANDALS RUINING MY EDITS EVEN AS I MAKE THEM!!!! THANKS FOR BRINGING THIS TO MY ATTENTION ) +You're asking me to defend one part of the article that's erroneous and citing another part that's also erroneous. The Walther PPK came about AFTER the Sauer 38H, the pistol on which the SIG P230 and P232 owe their parentage. In fact, all of the above mentioned pistols owe their existence to two unmentioned pistols, the FN 1910 and Little Tom pistols. They are both derivative and both developed in parallel. +Then I guess you'd better run off to AN/I, get JohnCD blocked and reintroduce the vandalism I asked him to undo . - ✉ +Marthandam College of Engineering and Technology (MACET) is the fruit of dedicated efforts of the members of Marthandam Educational & Charitable Trust (MECT). This institution takes bright young people and shapes them in to technically competent and socially committed technocrats and administrators by imparting quality education. The MACET is approved by AICTE, affiliated to Anna University and is an ISO 9001:2008 certified Institution. +" Along the same lines, it would be nice if the program recognized the Tawkerbot warnings. I've seen it where a user is listed as have ""No warnings"" but actually they have some from Tawkerbot. " +Haha, well just wait till I'm unblocked, cause once I am this useless shit is going off. +" Look in the mirror, bucko. And if you have the time to tag, you have the time to fix. Time to grow up and stop asking others to do the work for you. (talk) " +Whatever it seems to be I am trying, I am not trying to emphasize. I gave you some information - facts which shouldn't be ignored in Wikipedia but you just delete them. Please try work them in somehow. The fact that I cannot put those correctly, regarding my English or skills on Wikipedia does not mean those infos should not be there. Thanks. +If you don't want to read all of that, you can start with Archive 10. +" Blocking and Neutralhomer's Continued Lying No, Neutralhomer, I NEVER asserted that the Greaseman had died (and yes I know how trivial this is, but you continue to lie about me, and I cannot accept that). You reported me for vandalism for truthfully reporting on your talk page what I had actually done? HOW IS THAT VANDALISM? ISN'T REPORTING THAT AS VANDALISM A LIE? To recap, I wrote that the Greaseman's death HAD BEEN REPORTED by SOURCES considered RELIABLE by WIKIPEDIA STANDARDS. You accused me of lying and vandalism. You are wrong and I am right. Let's find out how the WikiProcess works, shall we? ""Blocked directly? Alternatively, you may appeal the block by requesting that another administrator review the block. To do so, add to the bottom of your user talk page (which you can edit while blocked, unless it is protected) to request unblocking. You will need to state a reason for this, and the block is then free to be discussed. Our guide to appealing blocks may help you in composing a persuasive unblock request."" " +WP:UNIGUIDE says that they must have an article but that directly conflicts with WP:N so I ignore that part of the recommended guidelines. I understand your reservations about not having a hard-and-fast rule but there aren't hard-and-fast rules governing the other sections of articles and things seem to work ok. If there really are enough interesting alumni that the list grows too long then just split it out into a separate article. And we can all object if someone adds one or more alumni that are clearly minor figures that shouldn't even be mentioned in an encyclopedia article. +Name change Even though the names of all the previous Eevee evolutions have concluded with the suffix -eon, this is speculation and we can't just assume that Leafia is going to be the same way. Wait until its name is confirmed before making this change. +This will give you unencrypted communications to the Wikipedia servers, and will allow the Wikipedia servers to determine your real IP address, for the purpose of blocking vandals. you knew that all along didnt you clown will eat me +Yes iam sorry you were not apologized to sir +, like nonconvex uniform polyhedron +]] and [[Lesbian Separatist +Well, as you are turning a blind eye to tendentious editing, violations of the 3R rule and personal attacks see here for example, or hereif your three favourites, , and do it. Obviously, for you, some are 'more equal than others', and for some, there are no consequnces. This is not occuring for the first time. Obviously one cannot expect an unbiased arbitration on your part, so do as you wish. +" Thanks for your already helpful admin work ;-) talk " +Sorry I have been unblocked already. It was not intentional, but an accident. +Edits which reference quotes from the subject of the article should not be subject to deflation unless you are an opponent of the truth NeilN. Do you have a problem with the truth? +" 2008 (UTC) I'm highly amazed by the fact that this debate rages on. If I may interject, Aleta formed a subsection entitled Arbitrary Page Break. Note using the word Arbitrary over say, Random? Are we going to throw a huge fuss over the inclusion of a more sophisticated word? Sobriquet is quite clearly at least somewhat different from Nickname, otherwise there would be only one article encompassing both words. My suggestion is per a growing trend on Wikipedia: Link sobriquet to a definition in Wiktionary, should one exist. This saves readers the hassle of going through an entire article trying to summarily grasp the full definition of one word within an article comprised of several thousand such words. Furthermore, if Wikipedia is meant to be an informal learning tool of sorts, why fear incorporating a higher grade-level vocabulary into it as a means of providing the best possible learning experience? And if we have to ""dumb down"" a word here, the same precedent would theoretically have to be set for the entire English Wikipedia, thereby degrading the quality of articles. As someone pointed out, if readers cannot grasp the lingusitics of the standard English wikipedia, there's Simple English to cater to that need. So, that's my offer for a solution. Dictionaries are as important of a resource as an encyclopedia and complement one another: Get the information you want and if you don't know what a word means, just look it up. -Alan 24.184.184.130 03:10, 1 December" +" Take a look at Aerith Gainsborough's article. See her infobox, the section that says ""In-universe information""? Apparently its like mandatory for video game articles to have that. its intergrated into the ""General CVG character"" info box. I going to make one, but I'm not sure what to put into it.....so far I can think of ""Race"" and ""Weapon"". Can you think of anything else? JUSTICE IS SERVED! " +" Why do procaryotic endospores get their own entry rather than being classified as a type of spore? What is it about the definition of ""spore"" that the bacterial kind doesn't meet? Their sporulation and germination processes and triggering conditions are analogous to those of diploid eukaryotes, and the asymmetric fission leading to formation of an endospore is similarly analogous to that of the asymmetric division producing eucaryotic spores. I suspect a cladistic bias leading to classification on the basis of evolutionary origin rather than objective details of structure & function. " +Reply: The advice from Abraham Lincoln could be applicable to all in this world. I think you can understand what I am exactly trying to say. +" Edit warring After the edit warring on this page, I have protected it for a week and started a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_January_16#Halifax.2C_Nova_Scotia. The results of that discussion should be respected, and no further edit warring should take place. | communicate _ " +The answer to your specific question about 働 hataraku is a no also. The onyomi was based on the right half of the character which is Chinese. Chinese 勞動 vs Japanese 労働. The Japanese character 働 is never used in Chinese. Do a search in Google and specify this character and restrict the result to Chinese pages only. You will some webpages using this character, but they are mostly Japanese pages mislabeled as Chinese pages. They are some Chinese pages using this character in the context of referring to the Japanese Labor ministry. I don't count that as reverse importation. IMHO, the statement in the article about reverse importation is incorrect. +" The ad thing I don't know. Sounds like too little gain for too much pain to me. The pain includes people saying ""Look, wikipedia now has ads in some form"", which is bad enough, and the possibility of people later saying ""See, those ads didn't break the thing, so let's make IPs look at them"", which is far worse. I really can't see the gain amounting to much, considering that we're now talking millions in yearly costs. Nobody is going to pay us hundreds of thousands of dollars for ads, unless we become a regular medium and we don't want to be regular, right? Zocky | " +its factually inaccurate, and biased. it shouldn't be presented like it is, or populated with unsubstantiated, biased assertions as it is. +" Deleting Power Rangers articles Are you just on a personal mission to delete every single power rangers article except the most basic core ones because you simply don't like the Power Rangers? You deleted my edit about Aurico being second in command simply because the ""previous statement was good."" Listen, if you continue to vandalize the Power Rangers articles, I'm going to contact an admin and ask for you to be blocked. You're nothing but a troll. Yes, I did just go there." +July 2010 Majorclanger, I'm not gonna protect you. I'm sorry I angered you Can you forgive me Majorclanger +They fixed it What the Chiz!!! Man. Dude they fixed it get your facts right. Besides just because wikipedia did not have it does not give you a good reason for you to swear and complain. +Please don't try to intimidate admins or you will be reported. Thanks. +Do you mind if I unblock Tawkerbot2 once Tawker fixes it? —aco +" Religion/Druids The page on Druids notes that most of what we ""know"" about them and their religious beliefs and practices is an invention of pseudo-scholarship. This page, however, discusses all of this in detail with an authoritative tone. Perhaps the entire section should be redone?" +Your persistence in making personal threats is truly outrageous. If you keep at it like this, you're the only one who will be looking stupid. There are multiple academics, and many erudite individuals who would agree that the movement relies on methods of mass hypnosis in its drive to create new converts, and making a religion of themselves, though this is officially denied. +" Yeah, sorry, forgot to let you know it had. Still couldn't make heads or tails out of what that guy had posted. I do think someone needs to clue him in on what is notable and what isn't. He seems to be commenting on alot of notability discussions, even redirecting a page about a town in Michigan. He isn't even close to what is notable and seems to have his own idea of what is and isn't. Maybe you can talk with him. - • Talk • " +On that page I was protesting against exactly this kind of preachy, self righteous rubbish. Now go away and have a break or something because I am not trying to insult you. I have not threatened to kill, sue, maim or denigrate anyone. That was not the grounds for placing a warning template on my userpage. It is blank now so go and hassle someone else for a change. ( ) +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, 12.179.221.130! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (call me Russ) {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats NEW +elton john/goodbye yellow brick rd WHY IS IT THAT ELTONS GBYR IS NOT CREDITED WITH 16 X PLATINUM WHEN THE RIAA OWN RULES STATE THAT EACH DISC COUNTS TOWARDS ITS TOTAL BUT WHEN IT COMES TO GBYR IT DOES NOT HAPPEN, AND WHY DOES THE LION KING SOUNDTRACK NOT CREDITED TO EJ WHEN HE SINGS THE ONLY SONGS ON THE ABLUM WHEN IT SEEMS ANYBODY ELSE E.G. THE BEEGEES/WITNEY HOUSTON YOU EITHER SHARE THE ALBUM WITH OTHER ARTISTS WHO SING THERE OWN SONGS OR DONT EVEN WRITE ANY SONGS ON THESE SOUNTRACKS YET GET THE SALES CREDITS YET ELTON WRITES AND SINGS ALL THE SONGS WITH TIM RICE ON THE LION KING YET CANNOT GET ANY CERDIT FOR ANYTHING202.180.118.24 +" That is the revised and Parliamentary perspective as put forth in Whig history, a form of scholasticism based upon total opposition to the Stuart dynasty and represented by the wealthy and elitist aristocracy. It's not ""my"" POV, it is the international viewpoint. When referring to the royal dominion of the Stuarts as shown on atlases and maps, they consider it Great Britain because of facts. You are making a mountain out of a molehill. Just because the regime changes may have shifted the definition of the United Kingdom since the Jacobean era, doesn't mean that the royal domain was somehow different. They remained the same lands as inherited by the Stewart and Tudor houses. Don't let the Whigs confuse you. " +Another amazing and neutral wikipedia article *cough* *cough*...(yes it is an irony) == Another Zodiac article full of Npov issues and even misinterprations of the sources.Why...? Well because some people add to much negative traits or some others add way to much positive traits. There are even people that when they give a source they totally misinterpretate that source for their own personal agenta (i do not believe in coincidences in this site) Taurus is not a perfect zodiac. IT HAS GOOD BUT ALSO BAD QUALITIES just like every zodiac. Some people must get that into their arrogant heads and stay neutral when they contribute or some reports to the Administrator will start happening around here for Non-neutral point of view activity. I am not a professional astrologer but i have enough astrological knowledge and i understand when someone is being neutral and contributes 100% exactly from what a source says...and who is not doing that. As the current situation goes in here i advice people not to trust reading the astrological signs from wikipedia. == +Yoo am mesed up, dont dew it agen +":RSimpson states here that ""Karate is not Japanese"". This is wrong to say. Anyway, it is wrong to say it in this black-and-white view. Of course karate has its roots in older Chinese martial arts, going back as far as the old Shaolin temple. Should it be said then that karate is Chinese??? Of course not. Karate IS a Japanese martial art, with roots in older Chinese martial arts. Japanese (actually Okinawan) masters of the 19th and early 20th century have changed the art into a new, modern fighting art, just as languages change, like Bihal writes: French is a French language. French does have its roots in Italy (Latin), but it is not an Italian language! There's no doubt about that, so why doubt the fact that (the modern) karate is Japanese? " +European witchcraft The article currently fails to address the very significant differences between the English experience of witchcraft and the wider European one, and the role that religious strife between Protestants and Catholics in the late 16th and early 17th century played, as the case of the Samlesbury witches demonstrates. Except for the brief career of Matthew Hopkins in East Anglia, there were none of the witchhunts so common in continental Europe, and some English counties like Cheshire had rather few witch trials, and only about 11 executions for witchcraft in total IIRC. Protestants in England did not share all the same views as their counterparts in continental Europe, being somewhat influenced by the views of King James I. Fatuorum +" Call it ""Neighborhoods"" and have it as a subsection of geography. " +You're being a jerk! Why do you insist on deleting the Radioactive Friends of the Deep page!? This comic series is legitamet and one of the reasons you don't get anything on Google is because it's all in a different language and Google doesn't do different languages!! Can we please just leave the page? We are currently trying to get more soild information and trying to find a link that well let people view the actually comics. Thank you for your time! +Keith William MacLellan Thank you for the changes made, but a number of links on the page no longer work as a result of the changes - is this deliberate or by mistake? +If you still think the statement is not reliably sourced, then take it to WP:RSN. +I fail to see any problem with the edit summary you quote. It was from my talk page and it was indeed an idiotic warning. Trigger happy Sess had warned me for removing a stupid warning from +Fuck you!216.102.76.214 +I had seen that site previously but cannot find any map from any of the archaeological institutions that would show more accuracy or even back up their claims. I have run out of ideas where to go to find the info or even a map showing anything like thier representations. The problem is that most geological maps tend to not include sea levels, there were no maps made at the time, and I cannot find any Roman period texts that describe the area (yet) There is mention of Pytheas sailing around the coast in 350 BC or so but I cannot find that either lol Ah well - I wil keep trying +Trivia? The trivia section is possibly the most confusing thing I have seen all day. I really don't know what it is saying so I will not try to fix it. +" Actually, another question. was listed as being suspected, but that account didn't come up in your list. Are they unrelated? — (say whaaat?!) " +I also won the Master Nerd Prize but not see where the user box is for that. +. I won't even mention Yemen. +OK i'll read it better this time. +No it is not reasonable to assume. In fact, virtually every mutant power has been completely missrepresented and changed in this movie series. Further, almost every facet of the characters lives have been changed in this movie series, so just because something happens in one continuity doesn't mean it will happen in another. Further, the section is about his appearance in the movie, not in the comic, so any details from the comic are completely irrelevant for his character. And using his comic book powers for reasons why the film makers would bring him back is an opinion. His body is completely charaed. Every character said he is dead. The creators of the film have not gone on reccord saying he is coming back or hinting at it or anything of this nature. The mentioning of his near deathes happened in the comicbook, not in the movie. This section is about his appearance in the movie, therefore, adding comic information in reference to his comic character is irrelevent. Further, CAPITALIZING your words does not porve anything and is completely silly. Find a source that says he didn't die from the movie, or the creators, or anything. Do not use comic books as an argument. Although the films have basis in the comics, the film makers only take what they want and have shown considerable creative license throughout this film to change stories as they see fit (sebastian shaws origins and powers, weakening of magneto by only showing his magnetic abilities, making havok not be cyclopse's younger brother, changing mistiques origins, changing azazel's origins, etc). Therefore, you can only talk about Darwin's appearance in the movie, as he appears in the movie. His body is completely destroyed, every character said he is dead. The creators have said nothing about him being alive. Find a source that says his powers follow like the books and he is alive, then you have an argument. Unless you have some other argument beyond the comics, do not wast time arguing . +" Snailwalker | talk " +" If that helps, I'm willing to adopt ""Collect's stonewalling and misrepresentation of sources"" and ""Collect's flexible criteria for reliability"" under my name - it exactly meets my experiences, but I have no time to collect my own evidence. " +I noticed that someone had removed the retired tag he put there. +" Of course you're not sure what point he's making, lucid as it is; you've been too busy belligerently shouting ""BEER!"" and making a general ass of yourself. " +While it's interesting that you think that Vodka originates from Poland (and personally, I don't care where it's from), you can't just add unsourced information to an article. If you wish to add this information to the article, then edit it neatly into the article and provide reliable and verifiable sources for your information. +Note: Article was a copyvio and most of the revisions had to be deleted. —→talk • +Note: It would not appear to be appropriate to move the article to Solarization, given that Solarisation—a separate article—exists. Closer examination of the current state of this article (3 American spellings [centers, color, colors] compared with 1 British/Canadian spelling [colour]) and its history (originally in consistent American English) suggest that American English should be used throughout it, per WP:ENGVAR. +Are you there? This needs your URGENT attention Sue Anne. Cmon, surely you should ACT atleast this time. Hi, Are you there Sue Anne? This needs your urgent attention. Apropos my earlier message to you, I removed the pathetic PA from Royboycrashfan 's talk page and warned Crossmr against the PA along with a fair note. Please do read that note. But he removed my first warning and also reverted back the pathetic PA comment on roy's user page ALONG WITH pathetic PA's AGAIN, in both edit summaries. I gave him a final warning as he repeatedly violated NPA and would not cease and desist. Yet he continued with his same unacceptable behaviour. The edit histories of the talk pages of User_talk:Royboycrashfan and User_talk:Crossmr will make this very clear. He keeps deleting and reverting along with PA's in the edit summary inspite of being EXPLICITLY warned. This is totally unacceptable. Please do take immediate action. You know me, atleast a little. There is no way anyone can get away with calling me a vandal. You know I am not here to vandalize, but I have contributed meaningfully to a few articles whatever little time I have been on here. Of course, there were a few misinformed civil issues along the way (which served to inform me about the policy on civility, NPA etc.), but after the block and blowing off a little steam, my behaviour has been perfectly good as can be expected of any genuine user. even Vesther for that matter with whom I had a little argument would not call me a vandal. Also there is another admin Nearly Headless Nick who has appreciated my edits to a certain page. Also have made a few edits to other articles the few times i was on. But surely just because anyone is a very occasional user, that CANNOT be used as an excuse for letting anyone get away with PAs. Also, NPA specifically states that earlier misinformed mistakes and behaviour CANNOT be used as an EXCUSE for a PA. If people kept harping on about old issues, it would become acceptable to attack anyone as everyone makes mistakes in the past. Crossmr just CANNOT be allowed to get away with his unacceptable MALICIOUS behaviour. Please BLOCK him symbolically for whatever time you feel is right, to mainly PREVENT him and later forbid him from: 1. Reverting the pathetic PA on Roy's page along with the pathetic PA edit summaries. 2. Removing my very first warning message with a very civil note. I dont care about the second warning, but the first warning serves as a placeholder for record's sake. Even after EXPLICIT and SPECIFIC warnings not to continue, he continued with his unacceptable behaviour and BLATANTLY violated NPA that too in edit summaries. Even after being explicitly advised to assume good faith (AGF), he has failed to do so. Cmon, for whatever you think of me (ur earlier silence), you KNOW I am not a vandal. Please take appropriate steps as a fair and upright ADMIN. I am logging off now, other stuff to do. Will log on tomorrow. I do hope and expect you to symbolically block Crossmr, which will prevent him from continuing to behave unacceptably as he has blatantly violated NPA even after being repeatedly warned about it. Thank you. Best regards. +" This isn't an argument. An argument is a well reasoned debate between two people based on something that can have differing points of view. This can not. People who want Justin to live have what the creator's intentions were and they are well stated. People who go by purely what is seen on the show know he is dead (for now). As the series ended with him dying, and didn't show him reawakening, there is no ""argument."" Just people telling the truth and others twisting it." +I am here to improve articles, but you require me to do other things first. +I IMPLORE YOU! FORGIVENESS IS A VIRTUE -R. D. Þornsson +" Wikipedia is not about the ""truth"". We only write what is verfied by reliable sources. We also call fringe theories exactly what they are, and do not accept unreliable statements and personal opinions to make those fringe theories appear to be the truth. " +Esterspirit is the creator of this page and may have been attempting to request its deletion by blanking it. This is not vandalism as the only contributor besides him/her were the editor who tagged it for speedy deletion, the editor who removed the tag (that would be me) and an IP editor who was most likely Esterspirit forgetting to log in. Esterspirit, by blanking the page, were you attempting to request deletion of Tamira Cole? +Sorry - this is a list of all lines. +" Uses I removed this section from the page: In Southeast Asia, the roots of the plant are used cosmetically/medicinally to all right, I can't remember what they're supposed to be good for, someone else please fill this in. It can also be used as an insecticide. it can kill a house fly.research in cogon grass as a insecticides is done by the researches of uplb. ... since it admits at a meta-level that it is incomplete. The discussion page is for discussion. (I don't have the expertise to fix it, but a complete ""Uses"" section would be great!) " +" Observation: It appears that some of those who ""oppose"" to this offshoot proposal, agree for a title change just not exactly how ." +" Tsushima Basin is an official name by IHO since 1978. For 28 years, its been intimated with every people on earth. Koreans created the name ""ulleung basin"" only for distorted anti-Japan hallucination. English wikipedia must use the official name. " +A simple entry is what i'm after, and you quickly devalued it into an apparent biased, non-neutral, advertising editorial... Being blocked hinders my chance at trying again, but i'm sure you're happy with your reaction, remember though, arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics... you may have one, but your still retarded...}} +" I uploaded an extra copy in case the site goes down again. Talk " +" Your supporting proving my point about your bias. ""SATANLOVESGAYMEN"" was being used as an example of where I personally finding that as a complement as I also love Satan while others may see it as an insult. Others seeing that as an insult is their right. I could put ""HAILSATAN666"" as my username and i'm sure you'd probably say that's offensive too whereas I'd say that's kind of a religious motto and greeting. What part of that (SATANLOVESGAYMEN) is ""offensive""? If you don't like that or interpret it a different way, you're welcome to do so. That is kind of one of the important aspects of Satanism. The word ""Satan"" can go anywhere that ""GOD"" can and shouldn't have a different reaction and if it does... not my problem. Your note and whole argument, and actions against me are outright fallacious and simply trying to use everything i say in a manipulative and out of context manner. As with the Fred Phelps article, placing that particular addition to his wiki was showing counter resistance to his viewpoints of hate. So yeah, I'll be sure to see about how i challenge this further. You don't really belong on this site as an admin if you can't see what you're doing or at least should not be reviewing any article or addition having to do with religion and in particular Satanism. Take your Satanic_panic elsewher. Calling my views ""trolling"" is designed as an insult to my character and opinions and simply false. I'm not here to necessarily go along with popular views nor be censored. If I do something that is vandalism, yes i agree it does need to be corrected. I did no such thing and maybe, maybe my reaction was a little overboard however yes i am new at making a lot of edits and never had such blatant and targeted censorship occur on here before. What you did was outright biased censorship based on your lack of understanding of subjects that you obviously don't have any business of editing or should maybe check the legitimacy before hand. What you're basically saying is my religious tenantshttp://thesatanictemple.com/about-us/tenets have no place on wikipedia such as "" The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo your own."". In my postings i did not make a single attack but rather placed factual additions with references. Now you're obviously spearheading an aggressive attack trying to also go after my username i've been using for quite some time. ""Disruptive""... Really... because history and text about history isn't going to be a little disruptive. If articles have mass bias, need mass overhaul, and so on and that qualifies as ""disruptive"" yes, i do plan on being disruptive. However, i am learning a little more about how to use Wiki Syntax and the proper places to put arguments. Yeah right, you're not being biased nor making an attack..... right. Do you want to poke me in the right direction for further petition and complaint? You'r basically having me admit i must be submissive to you who i obviously don't have much respect for and rightfully so based on your actions and displayed ignorance. I guess i should appeal to other members of my religion and church to make arguments and complain on my behalf against this action. " +Paranormal Activity and District 9? I can't see how either of these fit the definition of a sleeper hit. Both had huge viral campaigns prior to their release. D9 had Peter Jackson's name slathered all over it from day 1, and that alone drew interest from many people. PA was touted as one of the scariest movies in years, with unique trailers which showed audience reactions rather than the actual film. It was a striking advertising campaign, and one which created a huge amount of interest prior to release. Just because it made enormous returns due to its tiny budget doesn't make it a sleeper hit, it makes it successful. I'm removing both of these from the list unless someone can explain their presence there. 67.133.229.226 +" You omitted ""I am a c*nt"" also. Happy to be of service." +" Possibly unfree Image:Budva nocu.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Budva nocu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:Budva.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Budva.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:Budva CG.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Budva CG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:Sveti Stefan CG.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sveti Stefan CG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:Sveti Stefaa.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sveti Stefaa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:Milocer.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Milocer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:Plavi Horizonti.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Plavi Horizonti.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:MarinaBar.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MarinaBar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Possibly unfree Image:Ulcin.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ulcin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not bein +You are making a mockery of the proper processes. I am completely innocent and was harassed by numerous other editors, who were making unpunished personal attacks against me even on the Administrators' Noticeboard. Do you not even pay attention to your own page? These are the same opportunistic liars who used my legitimate, helpful contribution to the article Zoroastrianism 2 weeks ago to sneak through their unjustified change of the date format. The Administrators' Noticeboard is a sham. ( ) +Bullshit. You already took sides before doing even the most cursory of examinations. For instance you gave NO warning to DanielEng, even though this person started a revert-war, to prevent DOCUMENTED NPOV information from going into the page. As I wrote on your page... if you're going to use administrative powers, then you have an OBLIGATION to use them responsibly ... not picking sides in a dispute before even communicating with the other side. +Compression applications This is apparently relevant to Block Truncation Coding. The general idea seems to be that it's a route to an image compression scheme with a formal upper error bound. Somebody from the compression world might be able to make some sense out of the article. Right now, it's just an abstract definition. +Nice to see you back. I was wondering what had happened to you. Would you care to comment on the above discussions that you missed in your absence? +" December 2011 Dear FoxCE, I did not change era notations ""arbitrarily"" or break any rules regarding the WP:ERA policy, if you actually checked, I a) corrected a link error (""common era"" to ""common_era"") so that the link actually directed correctly, and then added the same link to another date reference that already used ""BCE""." +" Actually, now that I've read the ""smallest planet in our solar system"" bit, it does seem pretty damn mean. Who decides what articles go which days again? " +She self-identifies as black. Who are you to define others? +" religion Deleted ""furtively introduced"" too POV. " +Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Hardstyle. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +" Of course! I've filed a TR. '''''''' '' " +" Discussion Heya ) Please help reach consensus here. Its an easy vote, so don't get discouraged. • Talk2Me " +, 4 September 2007 (UTC) You can classify lower also, Infrasubspecies is next down on the hierachy of Biological classification, but how tongue-tied need we get on the talkpage? Let's get on with the issues and leave the semantics to the trolls to squabble over 11:12 +Daily Mail story What should be said, if anything about this story in the Daily Mail? The article currently says this: 'It then emerged that he is a member of the exclusive M Den club behind the Bank of England which sells £150 steaks and cognac up to £4,000, where he keeps a £300 cognac locker and has one of fifty electronic keys to a secret entrance to the restaurant' +Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with PHWA. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s). Make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. +My, we are being precise! Done. +" One big red flag in the proposed revision is the weight given to claims that a supernatural event ""could not be verified or denied"", which runs squarely afoul of WP:FRINGE. - " +" DYK On 3 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article Veteran's Monument in Covington, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Congrats ) " +" Unreferenced content removed I am moving some content I cannot find refs for here, with no prejudice for restoring it once refs are found.| talk [with regards to Ottoman treaty around 1634]: shared joint suzerainty (a condominium) over Moldavia and Wallachia (Wołoszczyzna). Władysław was married twice. At the very beginning of 1634, or even at the end of 1633 Władysław asked pope Urban VIII for permission (or better to say promise of permission, since no name was included) to marry a Protestant princess. The pope refused, which Władysław treated as insult. At the beginning of 1634 Władysław sent Aleksander Przypkowski with a secret mission to king of England Charles I. Envoy had to discuss king's marriage plans and English help for reconstruction of Polish fleet. King's marriage plans were discussed on Senate meeting on 19 March 1635, but only four bishops were present and only one supported plan. " +" Barnstars 'R' U ;D can you see me now? " +I think now that these numbers and units are rather confused by damaging septenary consistence than being truly satanic in their origin, because values of two third of them roughly matches reconstructed multiples/submultiples from God's septenary system to be found here: Previously I thought that these units and numbers are wholly satanic, because I didn't yet finished reconstruction of septenary system, and I could not compare these units. These non-septenary systems appears to be confusion of original God's septenary system, that was satanized by satan worshippers, by profanating/satanizing certain numbers, that before satan's rebellion were only planin numbers in septenary system and nothing else. +" All this trouble just because DNyhagen wasn't allowed to plug his commercial website I think it's time that we get the Admins in on this. We can't let one disgrunted commercial website owner, Dennis Nyhagen, reduce the value Wikipedia users get by robbing them of free OTR shows simply because he wasn't allowed to use Wikipedia to earn himself a few bucks by charging for the same shows. Now that Denny is disgruntled he is attempting to destroy his ""competition"" seeing how his ""competition"" offers his ""services"" to be given away for free. Denny, you see, some people do things for the good of the public, not to fill their pockets with $7.50/Gig downloads. Wikipedia is a great example of that, although you may think that Wikipedia should charge users for access. I couldn't help but read your website and how you insult visitors who download shows for free by calling them ""bottom feeders"". Denny, they are not bottom feeders. Many of them simply don't have access to Paypal, or live on a fixed income, or live in a 3rd world country where your $7.50/Gig download translates into a lot of money in their local currency. The person who is the real bottom feeder in my mind isn't the listeners, but rather it is someone else. " +" Also, which ""brand new"" user? " +" ""The losses were not comparable. "" They were. Admiral Graf Spee's damage was not as severe as some think, unlike Exeter's. The ship was nearly a hulk. The only reason why she was repaired is because the British goverment wanted it to be done for propaganda reasons." +" TFD and Andy, the arguments in your last post are invalid. Sourcing coverage requirements are for presence of material in the article, and for the existence of an article (which gun control certainly fulfills and ""gun politics"" might fulfill) not for the comparison of the two words, and not for talk page discussions outside of the above two. Lot's of people try to do the two step process and say that it applies to all talk page discussions (which is wrong) and also try to create a situation of ""my unsourced opinion wins unless you meet the very high bar of finding a wp:rs that addresses and refutes my unsourced opinion"" Which is what both of you are trying to do here with your assertion that the two terms are synonymous. So such is invalid on several levels. Sincerely, North8000 " +The wrong tobaccodocuments.org link was being referenced; this has been corrected. If your first question is regarding his directorship of CAASP, its also on the corrected link. +No. I don't want to be ur friend. bitch +" Cut-and-paste Change to more polite and good word The words of this section heading are taken from 's edit summary here. The words of in this diff are constructive and welcome. It is reasonable to copy-and-paste these sentences in the talk page venue for Maritime boundary: ""Hey, thanks for your work on the articles about the martime boundary with both korea. I'm especially grateful for the sources you've been able to find and add; they are a valuable resource for anyone doing research on these topics."" This creates a context for mentioning that Maritime boundary includes 23 cited notes and 9 cited references. The edit history of this article demonstrates a slow process which ensures the academic credibility of sentences and paragraphs.This represents a solid foundation for further edits and collaborative work. " +Just pointing out that if you intend to keep arguing this thing for a whole month, you're going to have a lot more people pissed off at you than just me. — '''''' — +" No problem as soon as you find ""some"" sources who specifically state that ""white"" is not offensive when used to describe caucasians. Guess what. You want find those sources because they don't exist. The fact that not all of your own references describe the term as ""offensive"" is evidence that the term is not considered offensive by some and perhaps most. " +What are you doing? Why are you categorising images here that reside on commons? They are much more finely categorised there. +on which I have voted but I might change my mind at any rate in terms of the Simple WikiPedia where there are lots of spam issues. +Important question Hello neighbour, what's the best Ouzo brand in Greece? I have 12 but I would think Tsantali was better? Sorry but I can't keep myself to read that brand as Çantalı... +" Removing Comments Hey HiLo, cant you please NOT delete my hidden comments in the Wikipedia articles as I am trying to keep it up to date as I don't see how to keep 2011 AFL season article up-to-date and correct if I'm going to be overseas soon. So please left my comments alone!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you, '''''' " +Let me narrow the discussion down to one of the more widely-known Nahuatl names: Nezahualcoyotl. In Spanish, this is usually but not always written: Nezahualcóyotl. The Nahuatl Wikipedia does have an entry for him: nah:Nezāhualcōyotl (with horizontal accents over the vowels). However, there seem to be very few English Google entries which use accent marks. The Encyclopedia Britannica article has no accents, fr'instance. I would suggest that we should either use the two vertical accents (as per Nahuatl Wikipedia) or none at all. I completely dislike the idea of following the Spanish example since Nezahualcoyotl was not Spanish in any way and this is not a Spanish language dictionary. +Balochistan Hi, can u stop editing the balochistan page. +Does anyone have any logical reason it should not be moved, or should we go ahead and move it 142.59.249.84 +Repeating Myself #1. Further to the idea of who wants to battle, you'll notice that I asked Nick to comment, not you. +" Relevant/Accurate Facts? Many of the facts or generalizations are in fact opinions. For instance, the suggestion that one million dollars is needed to live in the US without working is highly subjective. (one could live on $500,000 quite easily, based on the average rate of return for conservative investments like mutual funds.) Furthermore, actual cash is not necessary - many people live comfortably on businesses worth less than $100,000 that they own. Also, using Marxist language in the initial definition shows a political POV, as in ""The main defining characteristic of the working class is its dependence on wage-labor (or salaried employment) as the main or only source of income, because of lack of capital assets or land that could provide an alternative source of livelihood."" In reality, one could argue that the main defining characteristic is simply whether one is in management or whether one uses physical labor or 'brain' labor. In today's economy, it is not simply the lack of capital assets or land that may indicate working class, but also a lack of marketable knowledge. You can own 100 acres of rural land in most US states that would be impossible to earn a living on, while having the right knowledge could earn you a living anywhere. Finally, the alleged sexual habits of the working class (citing research 57 and 32 years old) is irrelevant to this article unless we are going to take the ridiculous practice of defining working class by their sexual habits. Also, judging certain sexual habits as sophisticated shows a POV and this whole section is childish. 01:11, 16 October 05" +And when you do make a clumsy intervention and someone reverses it, it doesn't mean that they're a sock of the banned user. +" I said it because you reverted some other minor edits as well from my revision which did not require to be reverted. Regarding the timeline, I do consider it relevant in the Mirage-based section, but within its own subsection, with a section header above, and below the text. Otherwise, it would look like an awkwardly positioned navbox in the upper half of the article, when everyone would expect it at the bottom. Anyway, I do appreciate the fact that you created it and I believe it does provide a better understanding of the subject. The ""Marketing"" term does also refer to how the vehicle was commercialized in a specific market and not only to advertising or promoting. I do not see any problem with using it instead of ""Market"", which is rather a noun than a verb in this context. It is also used in other articles as well and it seems that it is accepted. Regarding the generation numbers, I remain to my opinion that they should be used along with years, but, at least for the moment, I will stop doing edits related to this aspect. I consider them totally acceptable as long as they can be referenced. I have found this Lancer brochure, which mentions on the last page that there have been nine generations of development up to the current model. Regards, " +your edits to Talk:Ateeq Hussain Khan I'm confused by your edits at 23:47 and 23:51 on 9 May 2011. Was something meant to be removed? Or did you remove some entries and then restore them? +" Murder Victims Regarding her daughter's death, much was made in Great Barrier that Nicole had murdered the child, hence the broken neck and forcibly twisted arm being mentioned. Later much was made about the child being murdered, and Nicole's flippant remarks to Goren about ""accidents"" seemed to confirm she did murder the child. Given the information in the episode, I think saying it might have been an accident is reaching. " +Was this a live or automated response? +" If you go to Dbachmann's talk page you will notice that he and Hiberniantears have been discussing ways to control this article. They have branded the other editors here ""trolls"" and ""socks"" and it is obvious that Hiberniantears aims to work with Dbachmann to fulfill whatever agenda he has planned for this article. I recommend seeking aid from objective Admins to stop them from destroying all of the progress that has been made on this article over the past few months. These two are only interested in stamping out heresy. You cannot trust someone who brands you a threat to Wikipedia. " +"* Introduction and Getting started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article Simplified Manual of Style You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Faddle " +" I'll stop nothing that includes the truth, and what I state is the truth. We ""are not"" The Mutts American Band. IF you want to do this, you label The Mutts UK...as they took the name after the fact. We are...The Mutts." +Hello, Brainwashed Vampire I will squash the CCP like the cucaracha it is! You are a pathetic, brainless excuse for a human being....don't you realize the Beijing is the land of Mordor where the evil lies???????????????????? +" No, and [ŋ'] are the same sound, and in phonetics no one uses [ŋ']. My point is that in the system used here, an fheall is transcribed with (= conventional [n']) or (= conventional [N']), while a ngeall is transcribed with (= conventional [ŋ']), just as geall is transcribed with (= conventional [g']), gheall with [j] or (= conventional , ceann with [c] (= conventional [k']), and cheann with [ç] (= conventional [x']). Basically, the entire palatal series of IPA is used for the Irish ""slender velars""; the article uses rather than for conventional [L'] for precisely this reason. I don't know whether /x/ is velar or uvular for most speakers, but I do know that all the sources I checked call it velar, so that's what the article says. Wikipedia has to reflect what's been published, not what readers and editors know in our hearts (and ears) to be true; cf. Wikipedia:Verifiability. Of course you have to define how you use your symbols, and I believe this article does, but for the sake of consistency with other phonology articles at Wikipedia, this article sticks to symbols that are official parts of the IPA. I do think there will be more readers familiar with IPA than with the traditional symbols of Irish philology, and for those readers who are more familiar with the latter, WP:IPA-ga, which is linked to at the top of this article, should clear up any confusion. —gr " +" the sources are out of date, the figures are speculative estimates at best, furthermore, the latest headline i can find about the ""world's biggest star,"" in August 2015, claims it's Bradley Cooper! any such claim, about any individual, is, if you will excuse my French, bullshit. We should NOT be endorsing any such claim as FACT! Reportedly is what it is, these are entertainment news reports, it's BS news, utter crap, bottom of the barrel celebrity muck, it is NOT real journalism. talk. " +Genarians has the 7 that are available elsewhere. Hughes' reference has a photo. None for Goux and Picault that I know of. 212.183.134.66 Captain celery +best player albania 2008.erkan play midelfield ofansiv. erkan nick albanian maradona. +" Which means, my troubles are not over? welcome to almaat chat " +" We know that; no one wants to remove the ligature from the product name. Guy Macon, however, introduced the ligature into the generic term ""encyclopaedia."" " +Guitar hero Rocks!!! (this is an example of wiki vandalism lol) +Just post a RS here and we, the editors can decide. It's that simple. +hey buddy You suck asshole +MacedonArman people Why some administrators Romanians or Greeks constantly delete native names of Aromanians???? I am Macedon Arman and in my language this means Makedonji-Armanji! What is the problem??? Why these ethimologies are constantly deleted?? ( ) +be resolved through mediation +"This article SUCKS. It may be poorly written, poorly formatted, or full of pointless crap that no one cares about, and probably all of the above. If it can be rewritten into something less horrible, please, for the love of God, do so, before the vacuum caused by its utter lack of quality drags the rest of Wikipedia down into a bottomless pit of mediocrity. " +you have archived this page before. Can you throw this mess into archives too? Feel free to replace the image with the new one, or if you prefer to do so, repost them both on here to give more editors a say in it too. I would just like to have this mess removed form the talk page so it doesn't distract ffrom other conversations. Thanks +You left me no instructions on how to cite sources. If you were truly on Wikipedia to help other users, you would offer help instead of leveling false accusations. By claiming to have left instructions on how to cite sources, you have also lied. What's wrong with you? +WARNING Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.99.137.208.196 +I don't think there was any particular reason, very few countries entered the first World Cup. +" has been notified of WP:ARBPIA here. If he doesn't stop edit-warring I'd suggest you post a notification on WP:AE further reverting will only escalate and won't help the article. Cheers, ''' - talk''' - 27.04.2009 07:04" +" User:Hkelkar vandalising Pak articles This user keeps inserting poverty data in economy article and owns the page reverting others' edits. He also insists on old data (showing 32% below poverty line in 2000) instead of the latest data (showing 25% below poverty line in 2004)Please look into it. Per precedent in Economy of India mentioning poverty is entirely acceptable. Your ""edits"" are duplicated from poverty article with old data. Then update it with new data, but don;t blank the section. Also, look at Economy of the United States#Poverty. If a big developed country like USA can have a section on poverty it is only fair that other countries have the same. Image tagging for Image:PKR 2 rupees (Back).jpeg Thanks for uploading Image:PKR 2 rupees (Back).jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Help needed Hi, I've seen you refactor the coin and banknote table. Have you seen Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style/Currency article? The reason I'm writing this is that I'm having trouble finding time to do it for all the currencies. I have a huge backlog on my watch list. So I need your help.. (球球PK) (talk | contrib) And may I suggest separating the latest banknote series from the old series? (球球PK) (talk | contrib) Image:Dr Shamshad.jpeg Thanks for uploading Image:Dr Shamshad.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – (talk) (random) Wiki Project Pakistan The project Page for Pakistan has been started Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan plese join it so that we all could benifit from your input thankyou Orphaned fair use image (Image:Babia 93 Sajjad Ali.gif) Thanks for uploading Image:Babia 93 Sajjad Ali.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, +I dont understand how did I vandelize anything? I dont understand how I got the message I am vandelizing anything?Could you please explain it to me what you meant?All i am doing is trying to find out some information on a lady and her late husnad they names are christiana and appiah kuffour...As I am to be her beneficiary and I need to find out afew things.I apologize if I did anything or said anything wrong..God bless you.Laura +Headline text At the end of the story, Spock discovers that Stempel is one of his mother's ancestors, which ties in nicely, since Mark Lenard also played Spock's father Sarek in episodes of the original Star Trek and Star Trek: The Next Generation, as well as several of the Star Trek movies.Cute, except it hardly makes sense for one of Amanda's ancestors to resemble Sarek. +There really are no truly official sources for parkour yet. Julie Angel is an independent film-maker, and the subject of her PhD dissertation is parkour, but it is not yet published. That will be the first educationally acceptable source that I know of. Right now, aside from the founders, the only real sources are the self-proclaimed experts roaming around the internet. +There is so much else to be getting on with rather than going round in circles about effectively one word.... +Notability tags Please do not remove article tags without explanation and without addressing issues. Let me know if you have any questions as to how to do this. +2011 (UTC) Britons are Britons Just like Germans are Germans, In Britain you might say im from England just like in Germany you would say im from Bavaria etc. 15:10, 29 July +Forget the above for a moment. Time out. ;-) +frisians frisians are known to be tall, tallest around.. someone edited the frisians page and made it short and stocky... it used to say frisians are tall also, the wikipedia page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.123.28.198 Sorry, now I see what you mean. Thanks AWB OK, thank you for your explanation. I have since approved you after looking over the info you gave me. Thanks a lot. +Have you actually looked at the reference for the para, it is cited to Lawrence Freedman in the British official history. How are those credentials uncertain? +hey raviah girlllllllllllllllllllllllllll what you doing +No you understand me uncorrectly because your very deformed common sense is ready to lead you to immediate ending of discussion by indefinitely blocking of opponent. I understand that you may to do so because you're a kind of odd person with some administrative rights. It is not my intention, but your and only your assumption that, because you're a lesbian, I am not going to ever follow Wikipedia's rules. I only said that it's very pity that humans like you are aimed to use any possibility to teach not only odd persons. +I've created a special here. +" Also, please don't remove citations from an article. Thanks again, (Talk) " +(and videos, of course) +Now I have finised the plot and added in a theme/narrative structure section. +Funding of Royal Commission I added a citation needed tag to the Federal funding statement. do you have a source for this information? Otherwise it will have to be removed in due course. — +" Speedy deletion of Dave mcgurk A tag has been placed on Dave mcgurk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g10. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.   " +Add Criticism to Global Warming. How can this not be included already? Oh yeah, that's right. Wiki is a left wing propaganda machine. +So what did it say? +[[Welcome}} Tuberculosis Pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome aspects of cerebral tuberculosis. Tuberculosis of the central nervous system. Hope these help. +" The value of this contribution is clear. The story mentions that the normal age for this breed is 12, yet this is a member of that breed that lived to 19 years of age. That is more then noteworthy. The photo stays.. Contribute using your real user name, rather then simply follow all my edits, as you have for the last week or so, please. Thank you talk→   " +" Removing your comment ""You're unlikely to get an answer because, well, Wikipedia is not a forum. You seem all for adding what doesn't belong and reverting other's who try to remind you of the rules. Read WP:Forum. "" We've been through this already asams. You aren't telling me anything new. It's not adding anything to the discussion. If you have nothing to add, leave the discussion be. " +" User:CowleyJohn I've added the ""{{prod}}"" template to your user page ( process. I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please note that the purpose of a user page is not as personal homepage or Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, but as way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. If you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues here or on my user talk page. You may remove the deletion notice, and the page will not be deleted for the moment, but note that it may still be sent to Miscellany for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. | Talk " +^^^^^^ Asshole!!!! LOL what a half-brained chump bitch ^^^^^^ +" Norm and Ginni Parrott, who run the 3Cs taxi company where Mr Rosenberg worked, described him as more than a taxi driver and a part of their family at the time of the murder. Yesterday Mr Parrott said his family was still very sad over Mr Rosenberg's death but pleased with the outcome of the case. ""His death has influenced all of us, including our children. It's a very hard thing to get over but we will remember him forever in everyday life,"" Mr Parrott said. Mr Rosenberg had worked for 3Cs for four years. He was a keen member of the Apollo Players and music was his great love. He travelled the world as a drummer in the Ken Collyer Big Band in the 1970s." +As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. :==( o ) +" Take this discussion to the article talk discussion page. You still have not provided any proof/links/verifiable sources that show that Ramdasias are not Chamars. While I have provided countless links/sources that PROVE that Ramdasias ARE Chamars. Basically, you are trying to misguide the world in an attempt to spread misinformation. A simple google search on ""Ramdasia Chamar"" will show countless of articles showing Ramdasia is equal to Sikh Chamar. A simple search on any matrimonial site will show profiles of Ramdasia Chamars. Again, I ask you to provide any proof/source or links that show that RAMDASIA are NOT Chamars. These links have to be verifiable and not created by you. Bal537" +" (Eliminating the wikilink to ""troll"" in your message is a welcomed sign. )" +Links you need Wikipedia:WikiProject_Transport/Maritime_transport_task_force Our class page +Wow thats impressive... I dont think singing above the 8th octave is realy necessary since only about the 7th octave sounds like singing but thats impressive. i can only sing from A1-F7 but I have sung as low as G1 and as high as G#7 before. +On conflicts of interest Since you've been pursuing the question of conflicts of interest quite aggressively, I feel it is fair to ask you whether you have anything that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest with regard to the Deepak Chopra article. '''''' Talk +"|decline=Sandy's already got an account, push to talk " +[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg] You will be banned for impersonating a wikipedia administrator, this is your final warning. +Regarding edits made during January 30 2007 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. ()(Talk) +Template:Did you know nominations/Battalion Park Rosiestep has just done a thorough copyedit of the article, so I'm hoping that the close paraphrasing you found is a thing of the past. Nevertheless, since you did find it earlier, I'm hoping you can see whether it's been eradicated. (As you'll note, an intermediate edit did not do the trick, so I didn't bother to ping you then.) Thank you very much. +Because the early '90s were just so cool. +Majorly, would you mind commenting over in that thread? | Talk•Contribs +" Invitation Hello, I noticed you edited the article airsoft. I'd like to invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Combat Games, where articles such as airsoft and paintball are featured. Cheers,tLover () " +Long story short - stop picking on the dregs, the useless, and the retards of Wikipedia. +" As i said: 1. In Culture there is no use of taging, since you have puted this tag: The quality of this article or section may be compromised by ""peacock terms"". It already makes it clear that the section needs to be written. 2. In CTH we need to have: Russian contribution to sciense, literature, music, and the role the Russian people play in WW2. If what you try is to reach a situation one of those parts will be deleted, forget it. If you have a suggestion how to change it, write it hear. " +rust can taste nice but only if you add some herbs and cheese one of my favourite recipes is the one by jimmy +Need advice about a FAC review I need some advice. I reviewed and opposed Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/St. Michael's Cathedral, Qingdao/archive3 yesterday. The nominator is pushing back and spilling it over to other pages. I would like to remove myself - how is that done? Can I strike all my comments? FWIW, from the books I found with a quick search, I stand by my opinion that the article is not comprehensive. +" Ok, hold up, there's two separate issues here. One is Brevik's use of the term and the other is the side bar. With regard to the first one, the source appears to be RS. So the question, as with other sources, is whether it just mentions Brevik's use in passing or does it actually use it in context. With regard to the side bar. I think Altetendekrabbe is correct that the inclusion of the discrimination sidebar is somewhat gratuitous and pov, and that if we include that sidebar we should also include the ""islamophobia"" side bar and the ""myths"" sidebar (is there one?). The inclusion of the discrimination side bar is obvious pov because, in sources, the term is described as faulty, insulting, neologism reflecting anti-Muslim sentiment more often than it is described as a proper word reflecting discrimination towards non-Muslims. If anything the ""islamophobia"" side bar makes more sense then the ""discrimination"" one. " +Do you know anything other than WP:PA? You are very boring. Humans talk, discuss, do not insult or denigrate constantly, that's the first thing you should learn, before editing on Wikipedia, 'señor' Akerbeltz. +Ok diaper is changed! Mark, your not civil, your the kid in school that gets beat up for being annoying. The comments you make are not friendly, not helpful and just plain annoying. Stop posting here. This is not an invitation to reply, you do not need to have the last word. Let it go, move on, go away. Go remove some WPUS banners from Connecticut articles or something but go away. 71.163.243.232 +, 16 August 2008 (UTC) I'm terribly disappointed by this. There are enough disagreeable people on wikipedia. I sincerely hope you change your mind again and retire, again. You suck. 207.112.104.177 14:23 +Truth Truth you quit Wikipedia because I forced you out. You thought banning me was easy. Ha this vendetta has been totally worth it. I will continue to haunt you until you apologize for wrongfully accusing me of being a sock-puppet and harassing me - BigFrank PS - http://thedonkeyreport.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/websites-that-banned-me/ +User categorisation I did not 'erase' the page, it has been moved to a category. I appreciate that the category addition instructions are still there, but all of the users who have manually listed themselves have also been tagged for categorisation appropriately. The idea is to remove an extremely large bulk of unsorted lists, to be replaced by much more-manageable categories. All countries, territories, and states are undergoing the same makeover. If you would like to help with the conversion, please do, but PLEASE don't undo things that myself and a few others have spent a long time working on. Thanks. +Does that not show American bias here? +" No, the comments are ""removed pov and off-topic sentences"" . Your efforts to ""balance the assertions made regarding saturated fats and the incomplete data on the Australian study"" are pov edits. Thanks for admitting your motives. Note that you can be blocked for repeatedly violating WP:NPOV. " +Well then the article should explain that there is no time before t=0 because the way the article reads hints that there possibly is no explanation when its clearly understood. +Why cant I add new stuff to the Aryan page? The Stuff I wantead to add wasn't wrong information, and some of the stuff that I wanted to add can be learned here on Wikipedia then. 71.105.87.54 +...By leaking cheat sheets (questions and answers) of tests used to help people. +Hey again, i got your message. +i don't see where any of the book references have anything to do with yugos. i guess the books may have yugo references in them, but if they do, that should be so stated, exactly, or else the refernces to books is POV and unverified. and who is this conscensous on the porsche thing? who forms the conscensous. if i and other people with no real knowledge about programming start an article, and wipe out any corrections, as your editors have do here, do they get to form the conscensous? and if you, who are an expert on the subject edit it, and they roll it back, is that okay with you? you can not have website claiming to be fact. yet that is compiled by people with a Npov, with an axe to gring, or who repeat rumors, affecting peoples lives and livlehoods. this is what wiki editors did to John Seigenthaler. i am sure you a familiar with that. i used to live in san antonio, and being an anglo, i have a point of view on racism in SA. should i pubish an article, or edit an article on sa? i could prove that it is a problem. but i wouldn't do that, because i am not a expert on race relations, or have a degree in sociology, so i don't have a right to pubish that as fact as wiki publishes articles about people and things. you can not just let a bunch of people publish what ever they think in a public forum where some people are going to take it as truth because you call your self an encylopedia. and wiki articles are blindly republished as truth in othe online content. so it is not my legal threats that matter. it will be resolved on a much higher level that mine. this whole thing is why bill gates doesn't make windows open source. wouldn't that make your job so much fun, when anyone can change the operating system at any second? +Martin Luther King Day isn't actually mentioned in this article (though King himself has a brief mention), so there probably wouldn't be cause to add John Lennon Day even if it were a sufficiently significant holiday to have its own page (which apparently it isn't, given that it was deleted). +" Etymology of Sidious insidious // adj. 1 proceeding or progressing inconspicuously but harmfully (an insidious disease). 2 treacherous; crafty. insidiously adv. insidiousness n. [Latin insidiosus ‘cunning’ from insidiae ‘ambush’ (as in-2, sedere ‘sit’)] Perhaps it should be mentioned that the in- morpheme that prefixes the word insidious, is peripheral in meaningfulness, and that the ""sidious"" element has its root in LAtin insidiae ‘ambush’. So the word ambush should have some relevance in an etymological discussion. - CaptainSurrey" +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chester A. Arthur. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''''I'm and I approve this message''''' " +" Woo yay. I didn't even know bots did that. –projectors– " +I am in complete agreement with Kelisi on this one. One of the disturbing trends that I have witnessed on Wikipedia has been the propensity of users to actually REDUCE article sizes and chop out pertinent information. This is supposed to be a comprehensive encyclopedia and information database. By reducing article sizes and taking out relevant information about the topic itself, you are no longer facilitating the spread of knowledge or shared interests and it goes against the very principles of Wikipedia itself. Why would someone take out pictureso of the school or the staff and administration? That just seems inane to me. +Do a simple Google search and you will see Daly's name mentioned EVERTIME the Gun ban is discussed. Saying that his being a co-author if it justifies DELETION is like saying the McCain/Feingold Bill, should not be on Feingold's wiki page, which would be ridiculous. FOXNEWS: Supervisor Chris Daly, who proposed the measure, said he and other supervisors already have received threatening phone calls and e-mails from gun supporters. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144930,00.html SFGATE: Supervisor Chris Daly, author of the measure, said that police are exempt from the handgun ban and the ban. http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/10/BAGGCFLLCI1.DTL +Wikiality! To answer your question to me, Wikiality! If enough people say it's true, it's true! The foundation of Wikipedia! No actual experts, just a bunch of Dungeon and Dragon's misfits pretenting to run a real knowledge-base. Wikiality! Wikiality! Wikiality! I was reading about it http://www.colbertnation.com ! -) +You and Jack greenmaven are MotherFuckers +Shoot me some email. Yo. Thank ya. Mike[at]yahoo.com +" For very well-known celebrities, the US government archives may have something: a Google image search on ""site:.gov"" may bring something up. Also, the search engine on the Archives website (http://www.archives.gov/) may find things that Google doesn't. For people with military service, the military might have something (Google search on ""site:.mil""). For celebrities that were well-known before 1950, there may be newspaper photographs that have fallen out of copyright. These will be hard to find, but the Library of Congress (http://www.loc.gov/) may have something. A further option is to contact the celebrity's agent or estate and ask for an image to be released under GFDL, Creative Commons attribution, or Creative Commons sharealike-attribution licenses. In my opinion, if free-use images can't be found, the second-best choice is a promotional photo: it's an image that is intended to be distributed widely. Of course, there are exceptions: for albums, singles, and DVDs, a low-resolution scan of the cover is always appropriate. For movies, a still from a well-known scene or a low-resolution scan of a promotional poster is good. Failing all else, other fair-use images can be used, but they need to be tagged, justified, have the source/copyright owner credited, and used very sparingly. As for the images at Iron Maiden, I'm still trying to figure out how strict I should be about fair-use images: all the images there are directly related to the subject of the article (except Image:PrisonerNovel.jpg, which I've just removed), all of them have some semblance of a source indicated, all of them have some semblance of a fair-use justification, and none of them seem to be surplus to the needs of the article. I should probably push to have the justifications be made more explicit. " +" I understand your point - Pasch is an English word while Pascha is a Gree one. Would you be okay with footnoting ""Pascha"" after the term ""Pasch"" then? I look forward to your response! With regards, Talk " +Regarding edits made during March 13 2007 (UTC) to User:Rfl/FeaturedPictures Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +" New article I'm reluctant to add this as an external link because of the unnecessarily sensationalist title and free use of the c-word and questions about the sincerity/legitimacy of RS. But it does seem interesting to see this conclusion in this publication and it does seem of relevance to where this ""movement"" is today. I wonder if there are other less offensive sources for the same opinion: We need to remember CyberFeminism. We need draw VNS Matrix up from the depths and inject a little into our veins. It’s good medicine. These women’s voices—weird, angry, hilarious, and staunchly defiant of the (Big Daddy) Mainframe—are sorely missing from today’s many fractured conversations about feminism in online spaces. For every screed about “ethics in gaming journalism,” for every dismissal of women’s legitimate grievances about their portrayal in gaming or treatment in online comment sections, for every death threat or doxxing attempt lodged against a woman online, I long for the howling future cunts to come along and rattle some sense into the servers. So think about it (putting ""Right on sisters"" instead of the C-word) while I'm enjoying my site ban for doing too much of the above -) (Talkie-Talkie) " +" ...I may as well bite the bullet - I misread a date, so my yelling at Sven yesterday over him having done something again was actually him having done something I had already talked to him about. Had he really done it again, it'd be worth my reaction to him. '''''' " +EAT YOUR CYANIDE TABLET NOW, AGENT MACK! YOU'RE IN DANGER OF COMPROMISING THE MISSION AND WE MUST SACRIFICE YOUR LIFE IN ORDER FOR THE MISSION TO BE CARRIED ON! +This IP This is a shared IP. I advise any users of this IP not to Vandalise Wikipedia. Abuse from this IP will cause it to be blocked, thanks. 66.96.233.135 +Sup friend sup bro http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2587275&userid;=0&perpage;=40&pagenumber;=1 +" Replied on talk page - talk to me? " +It does not deserve a reply ? Or is it that you are unable to back up your claim with anything ? +Just the opposite, the books satirizes private interest in opposition to common purpose. +Sorry By Rondakalitus Ok Fine, Do what you want I just Wanna the Truth About The Wiki Sites. But Please Stop to say that I RUINED the Pages, That was not just my Fault it was yours too. Rondakalitus +" I added the ""highly"" reference to help the reader understand what that kind of insurance is best suited for. Not all level of HO insurance are applicable to all types of domicile. An adjective does not necessarily mean that an sentence is no longer neutral. " +Stop using foreign names to this Polish city of mine. PolskiNarodowiec1985~~ +Forgive my clumsiness, I can't find it in WP:PLAGIARISM. All I see is that bottom-page attribution is fine if sections are copied. +BIAS AGAINST PAKISTAN Is it islamophobia which drives editors against pakistan or just pro indian bias stop deleting pakistani history unfairly india was born in 1947 just like pakistan get that into your head. +"::I think this material is interesting information for Chiropractic#Schools of thought and practice styles, as this is part of the schools of thought. " +I added several paragraphs articulating possible criticisms of the movie in the second section. I'm not sure whether these additions are compatible with the NPOV policy. I would welcome a second opinion on this matter. ( 23:22, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)) +Keep the baqckground as that is part of the official Anews Logo Keep the baqckground as that is part of the official Anews Logo (72.1.206.186 ) +"==bcm versus km³== Dear Gene Nygaard, You said that generally everyone understands km³. I am not sure about this statement and find this use quite unusual and misleading. Could you please give any example in gas industry where km³ is used (maybe just some newspaper article)? Also, if youd could find any article in wikipeedia about gas fileds or pipelines, which use km³, I would like to get a reference. Google ""natural gas"" ""km3"" 823 hits Note that Google, as far as I know, won't search for the ³ character, but this gets those that use either html superscripts, or just ""km3"" and the like. There are other ways to find more of them. You will of course find many using bcm as well. But as I pointed out, that may be jargon used within the industry, but it is not known outside the industry (there might possibly be other little pockets of its usage in other contexts, even less known). another search, on AltaVista: km³ ""natural gas"" 3130 hits. AltaVista appears to treat ³ and 3 as synonymous, unlike Google. You can limit them to .gov sites, or to .edu sites, too, to see that this isn't ""newspaper usage"" but in fact more likely to take place in more serious and professional contexts. BTW, if you were arguing about ""tcf"" you'd maybe have a better case. That is common enough in the industry, more so than ""bcm"", that it is better known outside the industry, too. I am able to use different search engages. However, could you please give any example of use km³ as an unit of capacity of gas pipeline? Concerning tcf (trillion cubic feet) - it's used more in the US gas industry, while bcm is used mainly in Europe. Don't see problem with this. If you look the external links of this artcile, you will find both: tcf and bcm, depending of the source. In the petroleum industry the unit systems used are Oilfield and Metric like what was mentoned above, all depending on where you are and who you are working with. However I have never come across km³ being used to describe gas field sizes or gas production and if someone was to describe a field or gas production in such a way to someone in the industry it would have no revelace to them, it is not a standard of unit. It would have to be Bcm, Mcm, E3M3, Bcf, Tcf, MMscf, Mscf etc. Surely, we writing for a general audience not only for people in certain industries. km³ is standard SI if some people in some industry want to use something else, then that's their problem. P.S. Hello Gene. ɪmp Very true Jimp we are writing for a general audience. And when i searched some news articles by the likes of Forbes, CNN Money etc on Google news in the past month for the phrase km3 in relation to gas/gasfield/ gas field/ ""natural gas"" it returns one result from Petroleum World. However the units tcf, bcf, bcm return at least 102, 147, 51 hits when used with the above phrases. And these are from Forbes, Reuters, CNN Money, Globe and mail which i think you would agree are also writing for the General Audience. The numbers are in their hundreds of thousands when you do just a general web search for tcf, bcf and bcm compared to the 823 km3 turns up. So its not really just ""some people in some industry"" using these terms. Cheers Sure it is. But that's beside the point; we at Wikipedia choose to use standard unit symbols, not all the various off-the-cuff possibilities, and km³ is the standard symbol for 1,000,000,000 m³. It isn't surprising at all that financial magazines are too innumerate when it comes to units of measure to even understand what they are, so sure they get passed on unchanged. So what? Sorting on Ø's Are you quite sure that ø's should be sorted under o? The ø is a separate character, and is sorted separately in Danish (a,b,c,...y,z,æ,ø,å). | talk Yes, it's sorted differently in Danish. But this i +Please review this article http://www.netjak.com/review.php/1229 and let me know if it is alright to add my statements back in. They are not my personal opinion, they are fact. NOTE: I had already posted this message in your talk page, but had reverted it with his sock puppet as noted Here. +. I like to perform felation on sheep +" Why the fuck did you do that? Certain editors, who shall remain nameless, will think I influenced you. Probably use the diff to prove that I eat virgins for dinner. Hehehehehe. Talk• Contributions " +OK, yes you can. My favorite colors are green, red, and blue. I'll try and make it link to my page. Ian +" The Graceful Slick.... Is non other than an ungraceful dick!86.131.154.230 " +Irish Independant - Kevin Myers I think the article should stress that this criticism by the Irish Independant was in an opinion column by the controversial journalist Kevin Myers. Is it wikipedia policy to attribute this comment to the paper?I'm also unsure if a comment by a (fairly prominent admittedly, but certainly not outside of Ireland) now-tabloid journalist is notable... +" thank you! I am not keen on being the first to have this idea, I am more keen to mention it in the article, which we can now do ) I am aware of the ""oars"" interpretation, but I'm not convinced by it. Sure, it's possible, and unless a similar item is found, there will never be a proof one way or the other. (𒁳) " +Never mind; this one will be archived anyway. After all, recognition from the creator of one of the hardest-to-find secret pages is valuable. By the way, sorry for botching your talk page as well, although I doubt I am the first one to get this wrong... I like the format, but it wouldn't hurt if it were a little simpler, it would save you and your visitors a lot of trouble. , The Duke of +"::::My GBooks searches were limited to English results, and ""Gohatto"" got 5 times as many results. - oh, five times as many results? I am wondering why you do not provide links to such wonderous results. Why no links? This may well be a personal attack on me. I am very angry about it. I am going to report you on the reliable sources noticeboard for not providing links. Additionally, a precedent has been set at WP:FA, WP:GA and WP:FILM that articles don't even need to use the ""commonest English title"" either way. - I am astonished to find that you do not provide links. Failure to provide links in this way clearly constitutes a personal attack. My immediate reaction is to report you on the ""Wikipedia:WikiProject Knitting"" noticeboard. " +Hmm, I still don't see why you like to delete things instead of help improve them. Not everything I said about NU Metal was opinion based. Next time, instead of reversing edits and deleting contributions by people, maybe you should contribute as well. That's how everything great ever came into existance. 75.139.103.133 +Quit putting BS paragraph titles. I am accurate as the links and sources I have used. What the hell is The Authority Era? I've never heard that ever. The eras I have listed actually happened and for BillMcNeal the Brand Extension wasn't from 2002-2012, it went until 2011. Dumb paragraph title. Quit being a troll. +"Nobody's could be called homophobic, even employing words such as ""sodomite"", ""faggot"" or ""sexual deviant""." +The incident was obviously, blatantly, 100 percent, plainly staged. Utterly, completely staged. Fake. Made up. Staged. The fact that it was widely reported by the stagers and other media shills means nothing, if anything it only goes to prove even more how staged it was. If people are too naive, gullible, and TV-addled to figure out what is fantasy from what is the truth, then they deserve to be conned into oblivion. Mika was mocking people who were yearning for real news. MSNBC was mocking you. GE was mocking you. All of the corporate media continue to mock you with trivial B.S. So enjoy being conned. If they payed me millions of dollars to lie and mock average Joe Sixpack and Jane Soccer Mom, I would do it with glee, for such types deserve it all. Hyper_individualist@yahoo.com +" this is stupid. i defent the actions of User:Cerejota in Talk:Digg and then User:Krimpet threatens to ban me. i then post in Talk:Digg that the cost of defending User:Cerejota is banning and then User:Leki and User:Android Mouse threaten to ban me, too. User:Android Mouse also reverts my changes. so i harass them back. was there a more proper warning i should have made against User:Leki? probably, but i don't know what it is. but then in general"". WP:AGF!!! i don't see how i was ever uncivil. the one example User:Krimpet provides is bogus. that was intended as a joke and if you can't take it as a joke, that's your problem. it certainly isn't worthy of a ban. i'd post this on your talk page, User:Krimpet, but because of the ban, i can only post on mine. so i hope you read my talk page and apologize. apologize and make User:Leki and User:Android Mouse do the same. either that or you should step down because you are clearly a disgrace to wikipedia. oh, sry. my saying you're a disgrace to wikipedia violates WP:CIVIL, doesn't it? maybe you should have thought of that before you violated WP:CIVIL, yourself, and threatened to ban me. and perhaps User:Leki and User:Android Mouse should have thought of that, too. you can't expect civility when the people you're engaging in friendly debate with try to subvert your arguments by banning you or deleting them, all together. that i've been civil up to know is pretty amazing and i should be commended for it - not banned for it." +I thank you for keeping these logs as it is a part of the game. The 2011 White Sox page has the Spring Training log and it was never a problem before so why now? One the season starts the whole log will be collapsed so what is the big deal. I will back you up on the talk page. Thanks again. +TSO1D Here is how you cited my phrase Finally, he has stated that this policy should not be restricted to this city, but should be done for most Moldovan cities, including Chişinău. in the very secon sentence of this section which you started. Now, please give me exact citation of what was said by me, which is not the same thing as you cited. You bad faith starts here. This is how you enduced the readers and other users that we are debating of changing all the names, which has nothing to do with the reality. The result is clearly seen with comments of those who voted. The comments refer to general refusal to change generally all names, whereas the only question and debate here was about Balti. This is Balti talk page. All the comments posted next to NO answer refer not to Balto proper, but to general problem of renaming into English from language susing diacritics, none of them says anything to Balti proper. That is what I meant by your bad faith, I hope now it is clear. Moldopodo +WHY AM I STILL BLOCKED??? I should be able to edit now, but I can't. Why not??? +You also want eternal hell??? ‘chaitanya-mangala’ shune yadi pashandi, yavana seha maha-vaishnava haya tatakshana If even a great atheist hears Shri Chaitanya-mangala (previous name for Shri Chaitanya-bhagavata), he immediately becomes a great devotee. Do not dare to do anything against Krishna consiousness or your complete atheism portal would go to eternal hell. This is warning... +Hydra Vein - deletion Hi, It's recently come to my attention you have deleted the entry for Hydra Vein due to a perceived copyright violation. Please note I am the author of both the Wikipedia entry and the entry on www.hydravein.co.uk to which you referenced your initial notice. What do you need from me to re-allow the entry? Thanks. +I concur with Mozart20d. He took the words right out of my mouth (literally, we had an edit conflict, and I somehow lost my post). +Nope. Take a look at WP:N, WP:MUSIC, and WP:NSONGS. It wouldn't be an acceptable article because it isn't a notable album by a notable artist. That is one thing you absolutely need to understand: if you ever create any of those articles again, add references to them in any other articles, or anything like that, you will get blocked again immediately, and probably forever. Do you understand that?— +thanks for leaving, never come back, faggot. +Assessment I am assessing this article to Start class. +No, but his fellow Arbcommer NuclearWarfare did. 78.149.172.10 +You're not deleting anything. Just chill. I did not delete. Camelback99954 deleted and I put it back. +The lead there is very densly written though. Not a lot of clarity: too many statements, clarifiers and punctation that would make baby jesus weep. Its almost in the direction of bollocks, you might say. +(I believe the above editor means that he replied at the Danny Lost a/k/a Trespassers William talk page.) +" to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +, 24 August 2008 (UTC) DanielRigal, you are the troll here, are you not? Let´s be honest. 13:33 +Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_candidates%2FTompkins_Square_Park_Police_Riot&diff;=135067150&oldid;=135027320] He removed my comment from the featured article discussion. Not a big deal, but he shknow better than ballot box unstuffing. Last warning You have a long history of vandalizing and trolling on Wikipedia under the four IPs (User: 71.112.7.212, User:71.112.142.5, User:71.112.6.35) I am aware of, dating back to January when you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= +" He said he has school staff on his side and all you have is your wife and ""two kids"". He also called you and your wife losers and bullies. " +Please stop messing about. +" For fucks sake, I wasn't referring you, or anyone in particular. I use one perfectly harmless phrase which simply implies a person is being stubborn and suddenly i'm attacking everyone. There's a difference between a personal attack and an opinion. But no, lets just twist everything I say because someone brought me to ANI, one of the very few times its happened since editing here, then tell me to leave, don't look at the good I do here or anythingTalk " +Genk There are no wikilinks to articles in userspace. Wikilinks are to link other articles. In order to have a name in a list, the person must have an article first. It is a conflict of interest to add oneself like this. +" So I was reverting something that had an external reference? FO comes to mind.  Chat  " +yo yo yo ! ceat evan gray heyhey dawggggggg david suzuki....umm what i changed it to is right okay? +My user page Hi, I haven't been around much lately. I put up an explanation on my userpage. It includes a short narrative about Peter Ekman. Since you were also so involved in that episode I certainly would value any feedback you could give me on my talk page. Happy Holidays. +" I've been meaning to add info about the Oh So Sheer version of Killer Queen to the Killer Queen by Katy Perry article for some time and hopefully I'll get round to that soon unless anyone else does, but it's not really important enough to be mentioned in Katy's main article since it's just a limited edition version of the original. talk " +(PS: I use Scroogle every day.) +" Re: Personal attacks I have removed the following statement from Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Karmafist: ""but i would support electing Karmafist as most abusive, mendacious, hypocritical, and unfit admin in the WP project."" I feel that this statement constitutes a personal attack, and therefore have removed it. If you disagree with this action, please discuss either on user talk or on the talk page of the Arbcom vote. (TALK • CONTRIBS) thanks for informing me. i reworded it to indicate more of what Karmafist has done rather than simply what he is. i believe this information is important for people to read lest Karma do to them what he has done to me. when an abusive and unfit admin (of whom two of the present ArbCommissioners have voted to desysop him) tries to increase his power by running for ArbCom, there is certainly increased danger of abuse and harrassment to legit editors of WP. " +" Hello Please remove inapproriate language from your edit here before you want someone to discuss that with you. Thanks. - Wiki me up® OK! Great! Which part exactly is ""inappropriate"" and by whose standards exactly? Thanks. Let me know, so that I can do whatever it is that you command / demand of me. And the words that you want removed, please let me know what I can / should / am allowed to replace them with? Thanks for your help! And your concern! Much appreciated! Thanks! ( )" +The paranoia of this known homophobic user make him uninteresting. Just don't care about him and his homophobic agenda everywhere in wikipedia. 83.112.26.176 +" If this is an April Fool, it does not does much for the wit and wisdom of Wikipedia's editors. Assuming it's not an April Fool, then we seem to be stooping to the lowest depths of the gutter, tabloid press to attract readers. It takes a huge leap of the imagination to link a tiny infant used for political reasons with crossdressing - or does someone imagine that Chinese babies were wrapped in blue or pink swaddling clothes and then themselves chose which to wear? (talk) " +Notice the dates rolling back on the releases, 30, 29, 28, 27 - could the next be May 27, 2007. Of course that's just speculation but intersting ). +Nick GaS is coming back! It's coming to the UK! Cyphoidbomb is gay! It's coming to the UK! Cyphoidbomb is gay! +First off, you should not be posting comments in the middle of someone else's comments. It disrupts the flow of who is saying what and may be thought of as vandalism. No you have a biased idea that the be all and end all of baseball cards is those of the United States, which again reflects the almost defalult bias of Wikipedia to be American centred. I spent a lot of time in the UK and my mother is a Mancunian, so I am ever aware of this bias. I am not angry at you, but I am pointing out a fundamental flaw of the article, it is not written in a global context and it is not written for someone who knows little to nothing about baseball cards. Of the top of my head, here is what needs to be done Have more people giving input on article content, perferably some non-Americans Internationalize the article. Split off the history of American baseball cards into a Baseball cards in the United States article and have a brief summary of it on the baseball card page Return the representative type photo showing various examples. (done) Make sure the article is written layman's terms. +Oppose there is zero benefit to readers, particularly mobile users, from ambiguous titles. Justin Brown (defensive lineman) (born 1982), gridiron football defensive end, Justin Brown (wide receiver) (born 1991), American football wide receiver and Justin Brown (aquanaut), American professional aquanaut are clearly titled per WP:CRITERIA at the moment, leave well alone. +Sometimes you need a day to recover, otherwise known as a Resurrection Day. +I went there on a bus trip and i saw Rachael Carpani (Jodi), Bridie Carter (Tess) there 5 weeks ago maybe Tess & Jodi are returning in 2008??? +Would you please refrain from vandalising Wikipedia as you have continually done to the NRL ladder tamplate. It would be appreciated by all if you could leave the Bulldogs name as it is, they have been known as that name since 2000. thank you +Then do the same for the tiger accounts. +" May 2010 Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Apple TV, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — (say whaaat?!) " +But I guess we've both abundantly made our points clear above so I'd suggest to wait unless any new points are raised. +" You are free to undo the ""collapsetop"" at anytime. I can't give nor can anyone else permission for inclusion of anything. AS per Wikipedia:Consensus not one person was think inclusion was worthy. Now if you are looking for more opinions on this inclusion matter you may want to see ..... Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard The Dispute resolution noticeboard is designed to help diffuse small content and conduct issues, and assist in pointing larger issues to the best forum for resolution. It's also helpful when the nature of the dispute is unclear and in need of clarification. It can also assist if the dispute needs raising at another venue. This noticeboard is not designed to retake existing disputes; the need to discuss issues in a calm and civilised manner is important. Wikipedia:Editor assistance Add a new request here, just give it a name and fill out the box. For best results when posting here: Summarize your concerns concisely and neutrally Provide a link to the article in question using {{La|article title goes here}} Avoid copying large quantities of text (over 2 paragraphs) to this page Remember to sign your posts using ~~~~ Read the editor assistance FAQ and the dispute resolution policy (if applicable) Do not post issues here that are posted on another noticeboard — it causes confusion and may be considered disruptive Third opinion Be sure to discuss the dispute on the talk page, and list here if only two editors are involved. Instructions: Only two editors involved Concise and neutral description of the disagreement Include a wikilink to the article's talk page with a ""#section"" link for the specific article talk page section in which the dispute is occurring. Sign with five tildes (~~~~~) to add the date without your name. This is important to maintain neutrality. Start your entry with a number sign/hash (#) directly below the previous entry. Requests for comment Use the Requests for comment RFC posting tool on the WikiMedia toolserver. Instructions for each text entry field: This tool will only work if you are registered and you have a confirmed e-mail address registered via your Special:Preferences! Add just your username: Do not prefix it with ""User:"" List the page you're requesting for RFC discussion: Do not forget ""Talk:"" if you are posting to a talk page. (Only write the page title, not the full URL.) Choose an RFC category from a menu list: (11 selections, from Biographies to Wikipedia:Policies) Name of RFC: This is the name of the new discussion section that will be created Description: Keep it short and to the point. One paragraph only; you can elaborate once the RFC is posted. Main page dispute resolutions. " +There is not enough for now to warrant a page of it's own in my opinion. «CharlieEchoTango» +Honestly, we can't keep dealing with stuff like this. Please read the talk page. (let's chat) +GA Pass Thanks very much for the review of Poohsticks. I know it's a particularly unimportant and peculiar topic but that's what attracted me in the first place! As far as FA goes I think it's best staying as a Good Article as it isn't a widely researched topic. Thank you for your time. +" ""you can make an argument for prestige with many unis"" - may I ask what criteria you use to make such statement... The purpose of an encyclopedia is indeed to state that something has ""prestige"" if it indeed has it ;) think about it - what else do you suggest is to be omitted from an encyclopedia - do you have any defined definitive criteria, or are you just making statemnets without reasoned basis?" +14 seats are elected directly and the other 11 via modified D'Hondthttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-17769428. However, that said, I am confused why 100,040 votes wasn't enough to get UKIP a seat when Lib Dems got 2 with 150,447 votes. +Read this Talk:Walt Disney Mini Classics +" LOL. votes in support of my position from people who know the material are ""unhelpful commentary?? LOL you people are a piece of work. And yes ""you people"" applies. As for the supposed ""personal attack"", I pointed out a direct falsehood in one or the nom's posts; and it is a falsehood. Perhaps, given AGF, a mistake from not actually looking at or understanding the categories in those listings (perhaps BHG thought Alaska was part of Canada?? - a common mistake, in fact), but still *FALSE*. Claims of OR about well known regions and completely citable mountain ranges (which have fixed boundaries and are not subject to change) are mere hand-waving without evidence; the use of NPA to ""go after"" people who point out mistakes/distortions and ""bad actions"" is not what that guideline is intended for; ""contrary to the spirit of the guidelines"". And Ottawahitech is quite right, and I've said the same thing in the ANI myself - that NPAs and outright AGFs - including the premise of this CfD - are committed against me all the time; touting Wikiquette while flouting it openly. Stalking me in the wake of her peremptory block is not just AGF, and as noted by someone in the ANI, shoudl be grounds for an interaction ban. It's not me who won't collaborate; it's people who don't do their research but still want to have not just an opinion not based in facts, but wave in the direction of conventions that don't formally exist. BHG has waved her hand at guidelines like SOURCES (in one of ""hostile"" RM closures, which they so clearly are given they go against the grain of similar closures and both existing and emergent consensus), claiming they say things they don't actually say; her statement here that you claim is a ""personal attack"" is what it is; not researched, not acccurate, and like so much else of her nomination completely misleading and without any knowledge of the places in question. The adminship protects its own from examination, and does nothing when they violate the very rules they invoke; persecution of contributing editors and dicking around challenging titles and the like, by people who have no knowledge of the subject matter, THAT is what's driving them from Wikipedia. That includes many BC Wikipedians who were around when these categories were created and took part in what debates there were; to a British Columbian, they're obvious. But to someone from WikiLandia, armed with guidelines they don't accurately cite or, I think, even really understand, they're ""original research""......and yet they have nothing viable to replace them with, and sure as shootin' aren't the types who will undertake to apply whatever other system they come up with; and doing so would involve original research. Another acronym got tossed out above; does anyone talk in plain English anymore?? " +Already Fourteen Photos . Far more than most of this size. Maybe its a good idea to request a mediator .68.39.152.45 +" That the former president of Hallmark Brands USA is the current president of Carlton Cards is not speculation. That the founding president of The Hallmark Channel is the current director of The Hatchery is not speculation. That Hallmark now makes all Disney greeting cards is not speculation (Gibson has been sliced up like a piece of meat between American Greetings and Hallmark). That the flagship American Greetings Carlton Store at Chicago's Merchandise Mart recently closed without notification and was replaced by a Hallmark Gold Crown Store is not speculation. That American Greetings and Hallmark promote Sweetest Day using nearly identical verisimilitudes is not speculation. That American Greetings and Hallmark are blocking nearly every patented new greeting card concept from the market is not speculation. ""All things being equal, American Greetings and Hallmark Cards are a Monopoly."" " +Page merge I have undone the merge that you performed of the Save Manapouri Campaign article into Lake Manapouri. There was no discussion about it and the Save Manapouri Campaign is notable enough to warrant its own article. (talk - contribs) +Hahaha Pussy b/itch you're a B1TCH +Not really. Your edit-summaries are what made me look up Renzo De Felice and provide a summary of several historians opinion on him and his work. Hence why i stated earlier on that your comments in regards to work seemed harsh. +aaa im undead dont plaey with me and and and .......???!!1 +Hello there Hello there, stranger! Hope you're well. Let me know if you have any questions ;) / +Remove images or lose featured list status There is a discussion about Fair use images in featured lists at Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_criteria#Fair_Use_images which may result in this list losing its featured list status. - +Yes, that's precisely where much of the new material that's been added to this article has been drawn from. I do recommend it. It is more intended for general readers and as an introduction than the 1996 book as well, so probably more suitable for the encylopedia. And the Routledge series on great philosophers, is , I think very well regarded. I strongly recommend it.!!! +Are you aware you're under formal arbitration? reverting only helps my cause because the committee is watching the page. Give em rnough rope and all... +" Babe Although not listed on this article, I saw her name as voicing the cat (simply known as ""Cat"") in the 1995 movie Babe.68.206.17.148 " +" And why there is no picture of Russian soldiers and two pictures on Allies forces? It should be at least equally divided participation in Victory, and the ""Raising a flag over the Reichstag"" must be there. " +" That gives those 2 stations WP:UNDUE weight. If you are going to add them, at least link the episode title, not a number, which no one knows what it is. " +I hate you Just kidding around. You're too fast on the fixes =D. +Ignore greyanomaly hes been blocked several times for disruptive pov pushing you however have not so dont take orders from a pov pushing vandal indian 86.158.178.91 +I have been contributing with high quality material to Wikipedia for the past five years, and am well aware about its WP:OR policies. If you did not agree with my usage of the CN-tag or formulation of the disputed paragraph, I invited you for a debate at the talkpage of the article. Now you instead respond by posting me a warning about potential edit-war, which I consider to be very unpolite. I already agreed with you that we need to find a source for the unsourced part of the paragraph, but argued it was best to keep it temporarily as part of the article with a CN-tag, in order to invite for a collaborative work for any wikipedia editor to help finding the needed source. Wikipedia:Citation needed, proof this is an instrument we are allowed temporarily to use at Wikipedia - until we succeed finding the needed additional reference for the material (and if this is not the case - you are allowed to remove it after 1 month). Best regards, +The conflict isn't over. But since there are three editors involved, we need to go to a different venue.talk +" Instead of putting the merge in the 1st paragraph, why not put it in the 2nd paragraph? talk " +" btw, here are some google numbers: ""Ben Pon"": 60.000, ""Ben Pon senior"": 40.000, ""Ben Pon junior"": 20.000. This doesn't proove anything concerning which of the two is more mentioned, since I believe most of the ""Ben Pon"" relate to the father, and alot of the links in general are Wikipedia related. However, the 20.000 links related to junior do proove in my opnion that the name is used. Sincerely, " +Saab Lofton This man is a fraud! Most of his claims are untrue. He like's to embelish his work with lies. It is an injustice to everyone that he gets any mention on Wikipedia! +This article needs to be split up This article needs to be split up, as the information here duplicates that outlined in individual articles such as Banknotes of England and Banknotes of Great Britain - ( ) +Why the GA ban? How did I get a ban on nominating articles to become GAs? I followed procedures well. If i wasn't a major contributor to the article, I contacted the editors first. I only nominated B-class articles, and didn't do anything stupid or untrustworthy. I really don't deserve this. I am committed to the GA cause, and am thrilled to see articles become GAs. Why have I been barred from participating in favorite part about Wikipedia? +Snowager, i will hack you, because you're a fucking shit, and please, it you blocks me, i would hack you, changing your password. +Bastard You fat bastard! You have done it! Your end will come! Blood from your throat! Death in the air! And the DN group returned! And your blood is a sight of glory! You fat bastard! Sayonarra and go on a diet! +" Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2015 The first sentence says ""an 2015"" instead of the correct ""a 2015."" " +Natasha/Aimee,is a fine specimen. +Eddie: No. Stop being silly. I haven't made the decision to block you alone by any means, as you know. This isn't about rivalry, or a content dispute, and if you genuinely don't understand that, I'm sorry. Finally, threatening continuing vandalization if we don't unblock you is not a negotiation tactic that has ever gotten anyone unblocked. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) Bunch, I'm not threating to vandalize the site. I feel that you trying to keep me off shows me you hate me so much you're willing to prevent me from editing again. (Email me) +lyrics I wrote a beautiful lyrics. I want to spread all over america so plzz help me how to spread.... +I was the one that uploaded it. I won't revert it coz I don't want an edit war, however I will point out that if it was a header, it wouldn't have the (r) in it. That is almost certainly the logo, especially considering other articles on the PS Japan page. Its up to you if you revert it but its certainly not just a header. +Ya but it took a few minutes, I`m looking for better sourcing on that BLP now. +I'm not adding evering I can find about condoms that isn't nice. And as for Bibles and the environment can you flush a Bible down the toilet. I'd like to see someone try... +I changed the previously unreferenced lead, then added a reference for my change. The change has been removed, but the reference kept. What happened to content having to be verifiable? The reference does not reflect the content, and such a use is utterly unencyclopaedic. +Redirection to UNF is the only sensible action for Unf. The disambiguation page exists because there are several meanings for the acronym (including UNF threads), and it makes no sense to have a disambig page for one capitalization of the acronym and not for another. +Acording Acording to Larousse, Marinids, was a Kingdom and dynasty, and the Kingdom of Grenada took the place.Bokpasa +Of course. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Include the information you wish, and other users will correct you if needed. Personally, I think you should introduce it into the third paragraph, but reformulate the statement a little... +Ah. Thanks. 22:41, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) +" category tracker Hello Dragons flight! I was wondering why you stopped maintaining the category tracker? I have created my own version, but was wondering if there was a specific reason you discontinued that would be helpful in my venture. Also, if there is no reason not to keep it updated, would you mind if I updated it? (as many people still link to it) Thank you for your time, Yeager " +" Speedy deletion of Darryl sawyers A tag has been placed on Darryl sawyers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +No Sarek is responding to your comments directed at me, seen also here +Canadian Wake Up Posistion Just so you guys know, Wake Up charted at #6 in Canada. I found out from a forum in on for Hilary. I know you're not suppose to post stuff up from forum i think but this forum are all Hilary fans. Why would they lie about a chart position? +RE: Ralph Gordon Stair article Please consider this a final warning. Additional violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy or other policies will result in your account being blocked. You are again invited to discuss your concerns on the article talk page. So let it be written So let it be done +About a week ago a user deleted the lists on this page citing copyright, although reading the WP:CIL article it says this is generally done for lists based off value judgements and not data, and I'm no expert but I question whether that really is a problem with copyright. +Basically he's praising God (sat sri akal) that I have been blocked. +Listen chump not only have you acted in collusion with Willmcw but you have behaved badly. I would use stronger language but I don't think that it is appropriate here. I will say this, it is obvious to me and to my advocate that though you assume what Willmcw says to be true, the edits I made were in fact worthy, and not only will your reply be redirected to my advocate but also to a host of otehr administrators. This has become such a trying time that I've been granted the ability to switch to a new identity and leave your vicious attacks behind. You have proven to be a slimy loose moralled child who spends too much time at wikipedia tryong to bully others out of the edits you have only taken up since this July. Whihc translates to the fac that your 'job' at 23 leaves you such an amount of free time that you can sling insults and barbs online rather than actually do positive work at Wikipedia. Whereas my edits may not have been as substantial as your own, my sockpuppetry related to willmcw, or at least buddying upo wiht him, has not been as pervasive as your own. I'm leaving. I'm fed up with the typical acne faced loser who can't get a date with a woman or a man, and so spends his time in front of his computer screen making alliances with other awkward socially malnourished dweebs who can think of nothing better than to try an interact only thorugh the computer. You do a disservice to all computer geeks everywhere by trying to be more intelligent than others, because the lack of your vision seeps through the anger you display for all to see. Any true hacker knows that the way you have taking stands here has opened you up for retribution, as I am nnot a hacker, I won't work on such matters, in negative aspects. But you should be mindful that you've made a strong mess here, and no matter what your own opinon is, oyu should learn manners, and go out andd get a date rather than having your total amount of human interaction fed to you through wikipedia and your own websites. Loser +Standards? Which one are you talking about. Standards for a recall alternative? Or standards for behaviour? If it is standards for behaviour, it's easy to start out brainstorming (note: these are brainstorming ideas, some will be wacky). Blocking in an article where the admin is also editing content; admin presenting false information to RFC/ANI/ArbCom; gross incivility; admin is convicted of murder; admin repeatedly violated BLP despite warning. +" Full name I think the name should also include ""(peace be upon him)"" | Talk " +You need to stop editing pages RIGHT NOW you little shit. +ANI You Have NO RIGHT, NO RIGHT TO undo ANI edits Regarding Yourself +the effect of xanthine oxidase activities on ethanol metabolism +"Ok , Thank You for your help and insight . This page Clearly states that the new wave of british heavy metal is one of the components thus the ""heavy-ier"" feel than punk . Someone put in metal I thought it was already there for a long time, it kept getting removed . after some careful thought (I was there) I studied music history from Johnny Dodds to ""hardcore punk"" , I looked it to it and it makes total sense. The complaint from one page is there was no source and it was tagged I think as as ""fact claim"" . I looked to see if there was a source there was , it got removed all of a sudden by 3 pages. No explanation . Except the kind of ""cop"" out, ""Not reliable because its at about.com"" , the writer is a college educated journalist since late 80s. Not ""about.com"" he just wrote something they ""host"" . So a completely different page gets created and reverts it anytime I put it back, so I decided to further inspect the story and online history (section) at the page in the U.K section which is part of the creation (Next to a Picture of Lemmy) says ""Referred to under a number of names including ""U.K. Hardcore"", ""UK 82"", ""second wave punk"",[66] ""real punk"",[67] and ""No Future punk"",[68] it took the previous punk sound and added the incessant, heavy drumbeats and distorted guitar sound of New Wave of British Heavy Metal bands, especially Motörhead.[69]"" So I felt the ""heavy metal"" may have mislead and changed it to the more appropriate NWOBHM and this new page changes it its the only thing the page has ever done , created a few days ago, no explanation, no discussion on the talk page, removing sourced material and contradicting the article itself . Now that page has done 4 reverts. in one day....Can you go and see this please. I don't always sign in to my page and I realize I may have not reached the status to be able to handle this by not getting credit for all my work here . Ill probably never ask you for help again buy you seem to be Very helpful . Thank You. This page doing the 4 reverts today ; basically by definition edit warring . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Notavulgarusername " +Not really. I', trying to learn using my good sense. it is not so easy. Anyway, if I do a supported edit, and my antagonist revert me back, than I talk, but I'm reverted again what shall I do? Anyway, look at here. I had a misunderstanding with a sysop (it is resolved). But now, Brutadel. bother me! I wrote my reason in talk page, I've added some cn tags, but he reverted me! I've warned him, and I've resotred my edit. If he revert me again, I feel me free to restore my edits... Or no?? Well.... let me know. +List of Suicides thanks for the notice. My only thought is that the article should not assume suicides just because somebody for example may have overdose. An overdose is not necessarily a suicide. I mentioned something about that before last year. But that's all I can come up with. It's good article. +Edit request on 20 August 2013 Please change the lifetime ditributer share of chennai expree to 106 crores and at no 2 spot in all time highest distributer share. the source is http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/top-10-distributor-share-of-all-time-chennai-express-2nd/ +Still under arrest? Is she still under arrest? 74.67.88.102 +" And perhaps you could explain how an inoccuous comment such as ""Pity you didn't take a break sooner, instead of wasting 3rd parties time with things that don't concern them."" constitutes a personal attack. It is simply a comment about you guys double standards." +I am extremly sorry for vandalising Wikipedia. Please forgive me C.Fred and aGastya. I was only being fun with this but it turned out to be more than fun. I will now edit on wikipedia properly. +You now online You now online, so answer here. This my last reminder. +" I thought I explained that before. How about ""ethnicity-centred""? In other words, centred on the ethnicity of your ""opponents"". As far as arguments, please see Θεοδωρος's comments above as well as mine beased on WP:LEAD, UNDUE, RECENT etc.  λόγοςπράξις " +"you source Nazi)"" is an example." +Ok...Um I have a problem because all I really want to know how long a lawyer goes to school for and the average salary a household obtains. +" Sticky Would you mind giving me a hand in preventing the matter from going further and completely out of control? Please... Regards. | talk " +17 lakh people. You got to me joking. This is too comical. Do you have a proper proof of citation for 17 lakh. This guy drew hardly 5-6 lakhs for that Tirupathi meeting. He is way too bad to have a charisma to draw more than a million people. +To be continued. I'd like to reiterate once again that Wikipedia is a place designed to present honest historical record and not be another version of Chabad.org or TheRebbe.org which attempt to rewrite history and censor the Rebbe's words to present the issues involved in light most favorable for fundraising/kiruv in view of he authors of those sites. +Logo Please add a copy-right free version of the bank's logo to WikiCommons. Then, add the logo to the infobox element. Thanks. +" Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Organized Labour Hello, I was wondering why in your edit summary you stated you're withdrawing yet on the nomination page you said it's not promoted? It's norm not to have the nominator to close their own nomination (either promote or not promoted, except withdraw) so I would like to hear clarification from you. Talk page " +Well I'm happy to refrain from these attacks. But I retain the right to retaliate. As you know William had a shot at me first. Calling me a troll. Totally unacceptable and I hope he's been warned too. In fact it would have been better to inform me that he'd been warned. The other thing I found unacceptable is earlier when he tried to pretend David Bellamy wasn't a scientist. +no, i didn't really understand how to make the archive. do you know how? thanks. +Hi Moralis, I suggest you check Devanampriya's edit history for the Indo-Greek article... +Shelby CV525 Stop saying it's invalid. It is valid, I got a reference to prove it. It does however require you to log in as a Yahoo! staff member to view the article. I'm a Yahoo! staff member and I logged in to Motor Trend and saw the article. One of my friends, named Anonymous, posted this question. Motor Trend and all the other magazines hidden all the articles regarding the CV525 so that people that aren't part of the Yahoo! Staff don't see itthis is to prevent trolls from stealing data from the articles and sending all those junky emails to us at y_answrs_team@yahoo.com. 98.207.236.113 +Name The car's official name was Bentley T and later Bentley T2 therefore the hyphen and word series is unofficial. The word series is not, therefore, a proper noun and should not be given a capital letter. +" I've never seen those two terms used anywhere, so I'm not sure about using them. The others are all common; unless you find a source referring to arirai and ariranha, you might avoid them. Or ask Jossi or Joelito for another opinion. (Talk) " +Cleanup In a casual passing I noted over five instances of deplorable grammar. Among many other offenses: Never cite a source within quotations, never italicize quotes unless they are famously recounted (ie, That's one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind is okay, but italicizing some airbag disseration is not, no matter how hoyl the speaker may be considered), and my god use spaces after commas. Additionally, the article seems strange in that there are two seperate paragraphs devoted to the Taliban's defense of the destruction. These should probably either be condsensed into one, or the global outcry be given more space of its own, to avoid seeming biased. Given these issues, I marked the article for cleanup, since I personally can only tolerate so much Islam before my inner Troll of the Western Imperialists starts coming to life +" Video game journalism When removing the recent vandalism from this article, your change may have been removed as well: ""However, Grayson never reviewed Depression Quest and had not written anything about Quinn after beginning the relationship"" ☥ " +Another revert! This guy is doing nothing to hide his agenda. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spiro_Koleka&diff;=675471550&oldid;=675452574 +" elasticos selectos WP:CSD does not give ""advertising"" as a reason for speedy deletion. I'm therefore removing the speedy notice, and replacing it with the VfD notice. July 3, 2005 07:55 (UTC)" +I went ahead and restored the old records in those categories for now. Hopefully we can update them again in October. +Thank you Hello Arbër. Thank you very much for the tea-thing. Tu rrit ndera. I am happy to see that the number of Albanian wikis is increasing. For how long have you been editing Wikipedia?? I have been here almost two years and I think there is a lot to be done when it comes to securing NPOV on Albanian related articles. Fortunately the situation has improved since when I began to edit here back in 2006. Some of the most annoying editors have been blocked and most of the remaining editors are civil. As you can read, I am not that good in English but I try to contribute as much as I can. Wish you a pleasant holiday wherever you are. +Sound like the kind of malice and stupidity I expect from you +" script why cannot i see certain characters used in this article? is it a font that i may be missing? talk " +" You sure can, where is the pic? I'll translucence the shiz. Damn I'm fast. Dude, what was the point of this afternoon? msc - TRANSMISSION ENDS -" +Image:No_pi_bond.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:No_pi_bond.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. talk +, however if these problems reoccur, you are going to blocked indefinitely +Yep, why do you ask? +" Your foolish ""clue bot"" will be incinerated with immediate effect. King regards, the office of his royal highness jizzul the rager" +Doc Holliday Photo Problem Yes, I know that that photo of the dark-haird man you used is on file in Denver as Doc Holliday. A different photo (see the collar) from the same photo session with the same man actually hangs in the Cochise County Courthouse in Tombstone, and is also labeled Holliday. But it isn't. The only authentic closeup we have of Holliday is the one in Karen Tanner's book Doc Holliday: A Family Portrait. A standing picture we have of poor quality from 1879 shows he's still the same man by then (still light-haired, as Wyatt says). More importantly, the two closeups we have are of men with different ears. See my note on the Doc Holliday discussion page. It behooves us to get a no-question photo of the real J. Holliday on Holliday's wiki page! You can leave the other one in, but include a caption that due to the ears, some do not consider it authentic. You can then let the reader judge. +" ""Captain"" Sparrow vs ""Captain"" Barbosa All the way through the film Jack and Barbosa are trying to ""get one over"" on the other, to prove who should be the real Captain. I believe the article should mention someone about the rivalry and one-up-manship between the two. Jay316 " +Humour on Wikipedia is a sticky tarpit; better men than me have waded in and been swallowed whole, preserved for later generations who will display them in museums and poke them with sticks. - +\ Then solve our issue. If you are an adminastrator you can and if you can't i don't have an issue with you and will continue trying to resolve it myself. Cheers +" Hi Tom. Funny one. ) I don't see the ""note below"" that you refer to. As far as insertion of the info in the lead sentence, see the note above our conversation for my thoughts. The Wiki policy that I refer to, which is the focus of some people who focus more on their view of required format than they do on what is AWK, no doubt largely causes this problem. I expect you don't have a problem with mention that someone is Latvian, say, in the lead ... and do not view that as AWK. And, as you and our colleague in the above discussion point out, it was seem non-AWK to say ""Jewish"" or ""Jew"" either before or after the reference to Latvian. But, where some people's reading of the Wiki format direction stops us from doing this, we are necessarily forced into a more awkward presentation. What you say ""looks, feels, very awkward."" If I want to satisfy the format-is-most-important people, and I want to satisfy the AWK-is-most-important people, and still wish to reflect simply, in the text, that someone is Jewish, with no greater emphasis than mention of the fact that they are Latvian, I find that at times this can be challenging (depending on whether the interested parties wish to make the article better, or just like deleting or reverting the info, without putting it in a form that works for them and others). There are, I expect, one or two other groups of editors out there. One group just wishes to delete mention of the fact generally that people are Jewish. Another group wishes to delete mention of the fact that people are Jewish if they believe it will help or hurt the image of Jews that they wish to propogate. These two group, I expect, do not indicate what their true interest is, but cloak their arguments with psuedo-rationale argumentation. Personally, while I personally support reflection that people are Jewish especially in the area of sportspeople, I would not delete such a reference where the person in question is not one that the Jews might be proud to call their own. If it notable, as measured and this is important by reflection of the fact in multiple sources that are reliable and not connected, then I have no problem with ""good"" or ""bad"" people being identified as Jews, if that is the case ... the same as I have no problem with them being identified as Latvians. I appreciate your comment that you are not trying to ethnically cleanse articles, as you put it. I just had some people delete a category that I created, Jewish figure skaters. It was deleted despite the fact that attempts to delete Jewish sportspeople and Jewish fencers, with largely the same arguments, recently, by the same people, did not result in deletion. That is now up for deletion review. If you could give me any thoughts as to your thinking on how to address this issue that would be great as well. Cheers. Have a great weekend. " +" how about no. Pro " +Sir, I know the Vandalism Policy and yes, the user is doing It Read the content in page history better, A lot of vandalism has been done with POV accusations. This person has also written like an egomaniac on the talk pages, thinking his/her writings are always accurate. Egos like Thegingerone obviously think they're always writing right. The user recently also vandalized the Pollyanna page, by saying that the film was the major turning point in Mary Pickford's career I don't like prejudice accusations sir, and the way you assume I'm just another person engaged in an edit war offends me.65.112.121.29 +Well it's up to you. I don't believe the ban was justified, but it seems that HW007 may have been sockpuppeting to circumnavigate his block. If this is so, is really hurts his chances for being unblocked. The block was certainly wrong, and if a block had to occur, if it was warranted, it should have been done by some other admin, one who is uninvolved. If you go to arbcom, please let me know. Although, if HW007 is unable to participate, it might be useless as he knows more about whats going on here than anyone else (other than those who wouldn't want to self incriminate themselves. +Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TropicaI Storm Jason I noticed your involvement in the discussion and your revision of the article creator's illegal closure of the AfD discussion, and I agree that reverting it was the right thing to do, but I'm curious how all this transpired in the first place. As you can see, the article has been deleted, so technically the discussion can't continue any longer (unless an administrator decides to restore it on the grounds of sabotage). What I would like to know is why an administrator deleted it in the first place. How could he or she not have noticed that: a) The article was closed by someone other than an administrator, and b) That the discussion was nowhere near the proper minimal closing date of five days after the start of the AfD discussion. Furthermore, what do you think might have been the creator's motive for declaring Delete as the final decision? None of this makes much sense to me: the hoaxer willingly has his article which he has been fighting to keep for a while deleted, and an administrator wrongly and prematurely deleted the article for some strange reason. Should we just leave the discussion as-is until an administrator sorts it out in a few days? +Democracy and blue water navy are not interlinked. We must not get into whether Russia is a democracy or not. Regarding technology Russian naval technology is world class. Even though second only to the U.S but still is ahead of others in this area. Russian Navy has already moved into Venezuela and they have started operating globally. We must also remember that they are doing it alone. Surely the Russian Navy can be in the Blue water Navy list. +and that it should imply something the author never suggests +marakis: your reality, which we're well aware of, shows otherwise. Play games with your daughter and/or friends and not with the ones following your servile being around. 212.235.106.181 +He grew up in New York... this is his country. +Complaint Damiens. Your repeated arbitrary deletions of two relevant External Links on the Veronika Zemanova article are unwarranted. Stop it. Be a helpful and communicative contributor or I will report you to Wiki staff. Sincerely, Northbreed1 12 November 2009 talk +"Deception and objective truth== Yurica's POV is that the Heubeck article promotes the use of deception. I just skimmed it and if there was anything in it promoting deception, I may have overlooked it. I did however find a quote about exalting ""objective truth"", which I have added to the article. Note, however, that I do not want the article to say that Yurica is wrong. That would violate NPOV - something I've never advocated. The article should remain neutral on the question of whether Weyrich or Heubeck advoacate deception. It should balance Yurica's interpretation of the Heubeck article (her POV) with the opposing POV (if there are no facts) or the facts if there are any. ==" +" Hi Darius, a part of the reason I think the genocide looms so large, and deserves space in a 3 paragraph summary is because it is still a ""big deal"" and current event topic. There are laws being drafted in Turkey restricting freedom of speech on this issue even as they try to join the E.U. Major motion pictures like Ararat which cover the genocide cannot be shown in Turkey, sometimes due to the government, sometimes due to terrorist threats. So perhaps when there is an admission, and the topic fades out, the time will have come to relegate this solely to the history pages. Meanwhile, no two genocides are alike, but the Armenian/Jewish ones have a great deal in common. The scale of both surpassed a million, both ended in the murder of over half the population and expulsion of the rest, both were done under cover of world war, both had nationalistic and religious overtones, while targetting a minority known for industriousness and wealth, and the similiarities go on. The ""neutrality"" of information has only been an issue because unlike post-war Germany, which was thoroughly defeated, Turkey, which had signed a treaty of Sevres which stipulated an independent Armenia who's borders were drawn by President Wilson of the USA instead had an internal revolution, changing all their treaties so as not to even mention Armenia ONCE, and then began a massive government campaign to rewrite history. Therein lies the difference. 14:17, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)" +Biota Questions I have just published a series of questions put to Will Wright at NASA Ames (January 26-27, 2008); http://www.biota.org/podcast/biota_wright_rucker.mp3 I posted this in the game article originally. The information in the audio may be more applicable here. If the scholars would like to review it for any interesting information here and give references if applicable. Many thanks. +PS: IAZK, if you hadn't noticed, there is actually an Englisc Wicipǣdian too (because there isn't a single credible source that doesn't recognise it as a separate and distinct language from English) so, from that point of view, English as the language of this Wikipedia is at best 942 years old ;) +Oh so much courtesy towards me,:).Be Confirm that I can even personally like you but not your views.I was little bit busy.I will surely give my opinion on the current topic on Barelvi Page and at other Pages. Luken,I appreciate you that you are taking pain to resolve this recent unwarranted dispute.I will cooperate. +Actually it was several days before that date that I came across the story, I will try to verify it in coming days and weeks. I agree with you on splitting this page, it was a severe backward step without doubt. 16:14, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) +I'm very sorry to hear about your loss, Sandy. Your companion at least had the solace of being your friend for so long. +Renault Alliance Please stop reverting it just because you have your knickers in a bunch over it. It's valid info, and you have not once provided a valid counter-argument. 67.164.224.243 +" FYI... Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. THanks, talk to me " +"=Unbalanced critique=== The psychotherapy article needs a balanced critique section. The current article contains a section called ""criticisms and questions regarding effectiveness"" in which a few random studies have been cited, and a laundry list of random arguments are put forward. It is not a comprehensive precis of the effectiveness literature. The article neglects a wide body of work that points to a) the success of some types of therapy with specific types of disorders, b) discipline-agnostic characteristics of therapist behaviour that contribute to success, c) superiority of psychopharmacology & psychotherapy combined, vs either intervention on it's own, d) characteristics of clients/patients that seem to benefit most from psychotherapy, and e) vested interests of stakeholders in swinging research to one side of the debate or the other and other inhibiting factors - consider the two APA's, the various laws and licensing authorities, the separate academic communities in psychiatry, philosophy, social work, occupational therapy, the professional jealousies, the profound neglect of mental illness and psychological wellbeing in public health and health insurance, and the impact of the pharmaceutical industry's deep pockets on the dominant discourse. Please note that I am editing anonymously in protest against the tyrrany of the editing majority. Wikipedia's non-negotiable, amateur editor norm might be appropriate for certain article categories, but in more nuanced technical spaces there is invariably a segment that make nuisances of themselves by wanting to debate every word and angle. I have watched the development of articles on schools of psychotherapy since the early 2000s, and I'm afraid time and multiple amateur edits have not improved them much. In the specific case of psychology their mistakes add to the perception that this is a wishy washy discipline void of a body of knowledge and ANY facts. I suspect that this is partly why self-respecting people who are knowledgeable don't want to be involved in what is otherwise a very worthy undertaking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.118.144 ==" +" Thanks for the support Grundle. No worries. I need to get some stuff done anyway. The claims of ""personal attack"" and ""harassment"" are bunk of course. But 2/0 has, unfortuntely (past experiences suggests he's a decent fellow) been quite active along with Jehochman in carrying out a reign of censorship against those with opinions they don't share. This abusive behavior is damaging to the encyclopedia and is anti-intellectualism of the worst kind, but not much different the Climategate nonsense we've seen. Dishonest, misleading, misinformation campaigns like these are very harmful to the pragmatic solutions to protect the environment, so it's pretty disheartening that somemthing I'm involved in, Wikipedia, is being abused to this extent. The dishonest manipulation of sources, the smearing, and the bullying cabalism are very discouraging. But the world is not a perfect place. I smiled at a few of the discussions on your page. Your good cheer, good faith and patience is an inspiration. Please check with User:Drmies about the Markus article. They are both indigineous to Alabama and very likely know each very well, although I don't know how intimately. " +!! On promoting Myself. My YouTube Channel gets over a thousand views a day, nearly 76,000 views in the last six months. I sure don't need wikipedia! Did anyone even view the Videos? No right? Like the concerns for Copright when it is on an outside link. Youtube's job is to mind Copyright, Wikipedia has NO libility if a youtube violates Copyright. Maybe You guys are so concerned with your importance, or maybe it proves the pernoia +I agree, fair enough, cheers ( ) +I will remove this pathetic scum myself I will remove this pathetic scum myself by disintegration and before that.....hang....drawn....and quartered.... +About some changes to the article I'm sympathetic to a couple of the changes here, disagree with others: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Haymarket_affair&action;=historysubmit&diff;=436514314&oldid;=435546745 But these changes should cite sources rather than assertions, and should be discussed on the talk page. +Alternatively, tell me how can I get rid of this user. +" You're such a disgrace. You're a vandal. You're a censor in the worst sense of the word. Your censorship is better suited to China, North Korea or Iran. You seem giddy with your power on Wikipedia, ban me for life, it makes no difference to me. And, oh yeah you'll respond like you did earlier (""Ask and you shall receive"")." +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ireland. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +I see 0 ants in this image. +The language about the Henricus school - you editted my previous entry, which specified that the school amounted to nothing more than an school for Native Americans. This is true and should probably be mentioned because otherwise it would appear that the University of Henrico became a real institute for higher learning, which it did not and remained nothing more than a Native American school through out its existence. +Hello, Information about this cave in English is hard to find so I wanted to create an article to help English speakers learn more about the cave and the history. I am sure there are plenty of errors as this is the first article I have created and any help would be appreciated. +The split has been made, although the The Ladykillers (2004 film) page may need editting and reformatting. +What the hell are you talking about? Inserting tags on an article is not vandalism. And in an article on a location, anything which is not cited could be original research or point of view. And have you read the layout of the article? Do not bother me with idle threats which have no basis again. Good day. +Conflicts History]] I welcome anybody who are interest to view the conflict history, though I do want to tell you, I do not leave a trail of hatred. In fact I do become friends with them sometimes and asking them for advice, its one of the best way to acquire knowledge. Open your mind, let other give you the insights, in which you haven't forsee for your long years. The more open mind you are the more wise you are, the more mature you will become Note that most of the conflicts have already been resolved. +Why remove it for incorrect citation when you could just correct the citation? What you're doing is removing sourced content. +Adams motor survived one VfD (Testatika survived two VfDs). 20:56, 2005 Mar 1 (UTC) +WHY THE FUCK ARE THESE TWO THE SAME? THEY ARE INDIVIDUAL WRITERS WITH DIFFERING CREDITS. SEPERATE IS THE WAY TO GO. NOW. DO IT. NOW. +"As for the specifics, even if admins believe consensus is 'correct' for the ""Soccer in Australia"" article, in my opinion that consensus has zero impact or relevance to articles specifically and exclusively about football teams, players and groups such as Western Sydney Wanderers FC. " +" first. come on. I should be ashamed because I lied to you eh. LoL. thats the last thing in my to do list. If you wish to play a game of ethics with me let me tell you it wont work and I would advice you to do it first yourself. question your life in the web. Second. Yes I am talking about that Holdwater stuff. please I am Just telling again you are making your self funny. I talked with all these people seperately. you are a highly intelligent man who has devoted his life to web forums and being the genocide Champion and I see that as a real waste. oh I know it is none of my bussiness. just like you I love sticking my nose every where. finally. FYI: I have read almost every page in discussion, not like a real book ofcourse with fast tracking it took almost 4,5 hrs. I am really a grand child of a survivor so I wont buy any of your ""I have read all avaliable"" bluffs. Do you feel honest within your self. blaming a nation and its people with genocide recklessly. Especially when facing a person whose relatives were killed by your ancestors. dont tell me ""scolars are saying these and that"" stories. If you fare honest then you may have the right to ask people to be honest. bye. " +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: User pages The five pillars of Wikipedia Wikipedia in eight words How to edit a page (or, the quick cheatsheet version) Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Glossary What Wikipedia is not Assume good faith Wikiquette Sandbox (this page is for testing) I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing! If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page! Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages: Wikipedia:Community portal Wikipedia:WikiProjects Best of luck to you, and happy editing! " +Hello there you stupid weedhead! You are so f***ing stupid and dumb. Stop deleting my pages!! I´m just trying to help. You do also got a very lame and uncool username. /angrybirdlover1337 +" Okay then, Mr. Rather. Answer my questions instead of remaining quiet. Is the Long War Journal reliable journalism? They claimed last July that Al-Nasser Lideen Allah Abu Suleiman was still alive simply because a martyrdom statement was never released by the ISI. They also said his death was never confirmed. Does the ISI, AQAP and al-Qaeda also issue martyrdom statements when their leaders are killed? This is not ""chewing the fat"" so please answer my questions. " +I knew this was a left wing blog, and the above statement proves it. Be honest with yourselves, for the truth will set you free! +":It's not about being a ""dictator"". It's about keeping the article from being derailed and this page being flooded by every person who plays CoD and thinks they're an ""expert"" on firearms. None of your points are relevant to the article itself. Your suggestion for a lies page I'll never support. Furthermore you ask ""where does Red Jacket get their MP-5s"". Well...Will has mentioned MULTIPLE times that RJ has a Class III dealer's license. They can import whatever full auto guns they want...50 cal machine guns...whatever. It's doesn't take a genius to understand that when will said ""doesn't allow importation..."" he was referring to average folks who aren't dealers. " +Agnes of Aquitaine Hey David. If you have time for an article can you create one about Agnes of Aquitaine, the second wife of Ramiro I of Aragon and the daughter of William VI or VII of Aquitaine? But you would have to be a little creative about naming her because there is already a Agnes of Aquitaine, Queen of Aragon and Navarre and a Agnes of Aquitaine, Queen of Aragon, and this Agnes' birth and death date are unknown. Just doing that. I'm going to clean up the entire list. Just create a stub. Check Isabella of Urgel's article, it's as short as Agnes' article will be and she had a son who was king. Thanks David. You did a fantabulous job. You probably should change the first paragraph to show how her indentity is disputed and how the indentity of her father is disputed between William VI and William VII. I don't know. I wish he'll take it less seriously, I mean I can't put any dates that are historically guessed. He and Srnec are the same. He seem to only altered Agnes' page but Ermesinda's page seems pretty intact with a few arrangement changes. BTW have you checked any of my new lists, you can check some out at Category:Lists of countesses, Category:Lists of duchesses, Category:Lists of princesses, and Category:Lists of queens. I moved it. As for Majorca, it'll be finished after I added the independent queen consorts. Do you think another page should be created for Agnes of Aquitaine, Countess of Savoy since Agnes, wife of Ramiro I of Aragon isn't really even on both Agnes? Agricolae removed all the children of the Savoyard Agnes of Aquitaine. Yeah I saw that connection of Bertha and Agnes, but we can't be sure if there were one or two Agnes. We can just say how they may be the same person. I don't really care anymore, he must have been easedropping into our conversation. I hate arguing because in the end I always lose. One bad thing about me is that I'm a pushover. Well List of Majorcan consorts is done, in time I'll create another section for the titular queen consorts and another section for the Ladies of Balaguer. Please give your opinion on Talk:Miguel da Paz, Prince of Asturias Nice work on Agnes and Elisenda's page. My computer has been infected since Wednesday; I'm only replying via my Ipod. I probably won't edit until tommorrow or the day after. By the way congrats on Urraca's article. One question who is this aunt Sancha of her's? I don't think I've ever heard of her. Acoma images Hello David, could you please provide me with a link to all the wonderful Acoma images on Commons? Thank you. Hi! Hi Daaviiid, thank you for the nice compliments. I do not think I have ever edited Joanna Elisabeth of Holstein-Gottorp, unless it was about a few minor organizational issues. Might you have meant someone else? Thank you for commenting though! I have also seen your edits in the past, and commend you for them. DYK: Urraca of Castile, Queen of Navarre? Hello, Daaviiid. I have nominated your recent contribution Urraca of Castile, Queen of Navarre for DY +or violate the 3RR rule, +Go for it. I see no problem with your edit history, and the mop makes routine things easier. So, if you're ready for the RFA scrutiny - jump in! +" Dispite having contributed to this article, isn't a title with ""unusual names"" somewhat imply a POV?" +Re: Wiki website A wiki website is basically any website in which users can edit the content freely. Of course, Wikipedia is one of these, and this is where it got its name from. For more information, see Wiki. Have a great day! | (Leave me a message!) +I reverted the edits you big baby. Seriously do you want me to burp you little baby? Stop taking life so seriously and grow the hell up. I did nothing wrong and yet you threaten a ban without referring to Wikipedia's article on Good Faith Edits. Stop treating me like shit or I will kill myself you mean spirited person. +" Capital punishment Hi Skarz, Thanks for your message. Please note that my edit made changes to ensure the correctness of grammar. According to the Chicago Manual of Style, quotation marks should not be used when text appears in an epigraph or block quotation. Also, there was an improper use of a comma: there should not be a comma after ""The 12th-century Jewish legal scholar ..."" Thus, I encourage a partial revert to make room for these two edits. Thanks again! " +Wired article about project chanolgy and /b/ here. I'm surprised nobody had added anything from this yet, seeing as it came out a couple months ago, and because it has a lot about 4chan and project chanology. +I do think Ethnic Cleansing is happening in Libya, I am currently researching some sources in order to verify them. But I understand that a town called Tawergha may have been wiped off the map. Tawergha no longer exists, only Misrata. Tawergha a town near Misrata in Libya has been reported to be wiped out. I am not up to speed on Wikipedia's rules etc on so I am slightly reluctant to edit the article without being certain of the verifiability of the reports. But if you are interested please see this link: http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2011/08/13/tawergha-no-longer-exists-only-misrata/ +" You are a delusional... and an insensitive human being. You indef blocked, under false and/or flimsy evidence, others who are more civil (by your standards) and contribute more useful information to an ""encyclopedia than you do. Do you not ""get"" that your toxic behavior pushes others away, and hurts those who have suffered more than you can ever imagine? You're excuses you use such as being stressed, depressed and have a ""British"" humour is bollocks! You block people who've behaved much better than you, have a ""British humour"", etc., and who had edited stressful and controversial articles while being terminally ill! You pissant, you are the one who should be indef blocked because you sure are a dead weight around here. Sure you may be right now and again, but you have no idea how your toxic presence on Wikipedia has on others who are here in good faith contributing free labor, but have an online personality that may nor suffer the fools either, and use bad words now and again, but for good reason!! (It's not your language, but your attitude, you idiot). Boo hoo to you. At least you can take medication for your ailments, you hypocritical coward. It is the power buttons you possess, and the reluctance of those in the ""cabal"" that makes you a ""big"" person, does it? Wikipedia needs to change the false information it gives that admininistrators are just like anyone else, which is BULLSHIT. You should be ashamed of yourself and banished from Wikipedia for putting it in a bad light. You are the one who ""does not get it"" and should lose your ""bits"". The double standards are an embarrassment! Don't you get that? Or does the ""power"" blind you so? Do the right thing, and quit this project. You helped hurt and ruin a good person's reputation here. ( 65.27.204.71 " +Edit request on 30 January 2012 edit neymar to club leeds united please ( ) +LV, I'm sorry about this clutter on your talk page. You can delete my comments at any time. +impact page you might as well just give up dude. i can and will continue to make this update if i have to visit the page every 5 minutes. i have the time. i remember you from the discussion about the whitecaps and not wanting them to have a new page for their MLS entity. you don't know jack about MLS and therefore you do not get the last say about how an MLS page is updated. these games are officially broadcast by the league itself and the numbers are being worn and are clearly visible and assigned to players that official league announcer are referring to .... so obviously they are going by some sort of officially published rosters. the impact website is NOT the only way to have valid information. if and when the website is updated and any numbers differ they can be changed at that time. your insisting that my own f**king eyes are not a good enough validation nor is the OFFICIAL league broadcast/ers is completely idiotic and pedantic. there is no problem erring on the side of more information being available on wikipedia especially since it was information that was out there to be gathered and put on wikipedia in the first place. it isn't like the information is made up ... it comes from a reliable source ... the league itself ... it just so happens i was the only one dedicated enough to watch the game and compile the numbers and you were too lazy to do so. +The difference was clearly not patently obvious to you only yesterday, so don't be disingenuous. The talk page is for discussing the content of the article. That includes the use of sources. +Make a justice yourself. I am about whom, User:Marwatt brought so many complaints, that are mentioned above. I have nothing to say more about saying that please make a justice yourself. I am guilty for something, I affirm. But whatever I am editing in article Marwat is based upon reality, fact and a trueinformation. The User:Marwatt got some personal enmiy with the people, who I mention in the article. I just don't want that enmity to be brought-up here, as WP is not the property of Mr. USer:Marwatt. I have no more evidence of being a true one, except requesting you to make an enquiry yourself and make a justice by being a nuteral one. Also read USer:Addhoc's comment on USer:Marwatt, you will know the frustration of User:Marwat at me, automatically. A sincere and humble request. +" Notable This service, program, and concept is much more important than the author. It has always seemed like an odd ""oversight"" that similar tools are not built-in to WP. - " +what is a 3RR anyway....and OH DAMN...John Reaves ur friend has added to me the naughty list... +Images Insulting images need to stop, now. Don't call other editors baboons. You should certainly know better. +Yes just for tagging, I saw reliable sources for it as well and can see improvement potential in it. - +My rationale is the following: The village is really small. The coordinates might be wrong by a few hundred meters, so the coords template is still valid and helpful to position the event geographically. It's by no means less correct than most other coord templates at wikipedia. +Your edits were reverted since they are considered defamatory. And please, next time, prior to editing, experiment in the sandbox. Enjoy your stay on Wikipedia. +" John Lott page Is ""only a single"" really POV? The point of that sentence is that the claim was an unimportant part of JL's work, until JL made it important by repeating it all the time. Hence, the statement that it appeared in only one sentence in his book...but when you delete the ""only,"" the intention of the sentence becomes unclear. Perhaps ""exactly one"" or something of the sort would do fine, but just saying that it appears in one sentence is puzzling. " +" Its fake you are no ""15"" year old and of course you'd disappear and re-appear when the coast is clear. You're not thanking them like you own them because you don't . They are unbiased . You 98% work for the band period. Theres nothing hilarious about you or your behavior at wikipedia. One of the worst 2 editors to deal with ever. Certainly not a ""15"" year old . at a Minimum You are about 30+ years of age. Why don't you ""hope we cross paths again"" is that a Threat ? ""Hilarious and fake"" like I said my esteem and ego is something you'll never get through . Too many walls . ""fake stories"" don't try and dig where it will get you no where . You always have some story where you were any time there is talk page stuff going on but ""RIGHT THERE"" to make a ""revert"" . ""thank you for mediating"" like they wouldn't do it without you . lol I know anyone can reach out to anyone here at wiki . Anyway were done here . FINALLY . deem this article what it is . Deceptive . 73.193.195.69 " +All or nothing makes plenty of sense. Either include the main branches, or just leave the link to the separate article. I have added a revert warning to your page, as well. +" Rubywine you are mixing thinks up and do conclusions out of the context. You mention these things: ""I am perturbed at the strong tendency towards territorialism over this article displayed by and "" We do not want to own or be the ""alpha-editing"" guys on these article. As i already wrote, a lot of people worked on the article, and it provoced me a lot that the entire work of them was replaced by a copyright template without any serious demands inside the article. I know you say there are serious demands, i oppose it and call them original research and neutral point of view. ""rejecting contributions from new editors "", ""patronising new editors"", ""and intense personal hostility towards new editors"" this is absolut out of the context. First, you made major changes without writting them down on the talk page. Second, after your edits have been reverted you placed a copyright template. At last, i was not the one who started to be offensive! On the contrary, when you or henriettapussycat wanted to leave i asked to continue your work! The answer was, because i did not agree with the claim of a copyright violation, i was called stupid, and that i dont understand copyright violations. After this i got offensive, not before! Italic text""In fact since starting work on this article I have engaged in far more discussion on this talk page than either of my accusers"" Yes but you did not edit the stuff you named as copyright violation for over a week.Italic text""Secondly, I continue to be extremely dismayed at the material which appeared under the sections for sexual and psychological effects"" Could this not be fixed without a copyright template? Italic text""Lastly, for anyone who imagines that they WP:OWN this article, or who continues to regard it as a personal hobbyhorse, take note: after it emerges from copyvio scrutiny I will be making every effort to invite contributions from the Association of African Women Scholars, RAINBO and other women's health activists. This article is desperately in need of scholarly attention by people with relevant qualifications, knowledge and experience"" You blame others that this article maybe their personal hobbyhorse? With your actions you are the last one who should use such a sentence! ""This article is desperately in need of scholarly attention by people with relevant qualifications, knowledge and experience""'' This article is mostly based on conclusions of official health organisations or human right groups like WHO, UNICEF and UNFARP. Do you really think their work is based on persons with lesser qualifications, knowledge and experience? It seems to me that you and Henriettapussycat project your false and unlogic conclusions on others, add some logical definitions out of the context to act a logical conclusion related to the original issue. Furthermore i get more and more the feeling that you use the argumentation of a possible copyright violation to push your changes of the article. " +"8:41PM CST for WILDKNOX: Apology accepted. Thank you for accepting mine. What is ""offish""? What is wrong with it if it provides what it's supposed to provide? Joey Jordison was in-studio and talked about it with the guys. Please explain further. They're going through a site overhaul for the next few weeks, but it does it's job. Help me for future reference. I standby how I feel. ) " +When I first read standard offer, I didn't quite understand it. But now I do. There is no way I can go without editing wikipedia for 6 whole months, I am completely addicted. You can't stop me from editing +" But such a lede would contradict the title of the page. Is that a good solution? If we move the page to a more reasonably titled one then there is no problem anymore. Incidentally there are other limit cases: sets in all flat keys, all sharp keys, etc. so I agree we should think carefully about the new title. Contact here " +Oh righto then. Cheers, (talk · contribs) +Requested move Greeks in the United Kingdom → – Greeks in the United Kingdom can not be used as a Demonym so the best and most used term is Greek British. (MarkMysoe) +" WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - January 2009 Note: the Newsletter is ""collapsed"" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the ""show"" button at the right end of the gray bar. {| class=""navbox collapsible collapsed"" style=""text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"" |- ! style=""background-color: #bfb1a3; text-align: center;"" |The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter |- | style=""border: solid 1px #bfb1a3;""| {| |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" style=""width: 60%; background: #bfb1a3 solid; border: 0px; padding: 1em; background: #50A6C2"" | Project Talk Page The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter Issue VI - January 2009 |- valign=""top"" | valign=""top"" style=""border: 0px; padding: 0em; width: 65%; "" | Project News Welcome to a special two month recap edition of the Eurovision Newsletter. From here on out, each monthly edition will be released at the end of the month, and will highlight the month's events. The backlog of assessments in the project is still ongoing, with a large number of articles not being rated. If you see articles without the template on the article's talk page, please add it, or read Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment if you would like to help assess the articles as well. Remember to source all information you add to pages or else it may be removed and always use an edit summary so other users know why you are adding or removing information. Eurovision News Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Denmark, Finland, Montenegro, Romania, Turkey, and the United Kingdom have chosen their songs and entrants for the upcoming 2009 contest. The draw to determine which countries will participate in which final took place on January 30. The sub-logo of the contest was revealed to be a ""Fantasy Bird"" with many colors, while no slogan will be used this year. Do you have news for the next issue? Submit it here! Member News The project currently has 59 members. Want to invite new members? Place our invitation template on the talk page of anyone you would like to invite to our project. New Members We would like to welcome the new members who joined in December and January. (by date joined) | {| valign=""top"" padding: 0em;"" | | valign=""top"" style=""border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;"" | From the Members Welcome to the sixth edition of the WikiProject Eurvision newsletter! It's been a busy few months for me at school so I am going to need a lot more participation from the WikiProject in organizing this newsletter each month. It's not an easy task. The best way to help would be to submit anything you feel should be on the next newsletter here so that when I want to make it, I have all of the information ready to go. Also, by doing it this way, there is more information that you want to know as opposed to what I felt was important. National final season is now in full swing and participants and songs are being chosen every week. For the most part, we are doing a great job in keeping all of the pages up to date, but I urge veteran editors to help out the new people as they tend to not know how everything should be +I don't think he has ownership problems, he is however right to want to keep the article this way, please stop messing with the article 208.189.200.254 +" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Are you referring to the Orphan tag at the top of the article? That says that too few articles link to this one. arfcontribs. " +" Well, as I said, there's also more to look at on Google (which I still have to do). But it is an interesting question what ""widespread use"" exactly means, when exactly is it that sufficient people have caught up the term? (Because in this case other authors have caught up the term, but (probably) still in reaction to the original authors.) Also, I found the tag. Couldn't this be a better tag, at least for the time being, per the text on WP:N? " +" Actually, you and Jack are incorrect: ""The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting verifiable perspectives on a topic as evidenced by reliable sources. The policy requires that where multiple or conflicting perspectives exist within a topic each should be presented fairly. None of the views should be given undue weight or asserted as being judged as ""the truth"", in order that the various significant published viewpoints are made accessible to the reader, not just the most popular one. It should also not be asserted that the most popular view, or some sort of intermediate view among the different views, is the correct one to the extent that other views are mentioned only pejoratively."" " +Unprotect the article Look enough is enough. I don't care about your consensus. I don't give a damn about you and anybody others consensus. I just want the article to be there. C'mon man how many times I have to beg you to not delete the article. Leave your wiki user consensus aside and try to take a survey of some real Coban fans. Over 80 percent will want to have an article on Khitai. They won't care if it will have a third part source not. And also I haven't edited the article after I remade it. MegaCyanide666 +" Nick, I never said you couldn't edit the page after I got there first, I just asked how you'd gotten there, a question you rightly point out you are not necessarily obliged to answer. It was not a signal for you to unleash a torrent of abuse on me. Please reconsider. " +"Ray Harryhausen and Bernard Herrmann == Even though Harryhausen is basically a special effects artist rather than a director his films are most commonly thought of as ""Ray Harryhausen films"" rather than by the director. That said, Bernard Herrmann scored four of Harryhausen's films: The 7th Voyage of Sinbad, The Three Worlds of Gulliver, Mysterious Island, and Jason and the Argonauts. == " +22:54, 29 January 2007 +I know that it's a difficult concept for some to get their head around, so focus very hard on what I'm about to say SOME PEOPLE (the Cardinal that was referenced included) HAVE CRITICIZED JESUS FOR NOT CONDEMNING SLAVERY. Do you get it now? It's complicated for some, I know. +Yes, both Anglicanism and Anglican Communion could do with a mutual tidy. I think that Anglican Communion should probably concentrate on the organisation, while Anglicanism should in principle focus on the theology. Both articles probably need a measure of history. Like Anglicans, it'll probably muddle through to a compromise in the end! 06:20, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC) +" OH yes the ""close relatives of the late Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich"" are right, this Angelic man (Lazar) was nothing like what Stuart Kahan wrote. I am sorry. Yours, " +Kosovo Zoupan, dont delete my texts just because you can't handle arguments. Kosovar-Albanians are pretty anti-slavic. So whats the problem? +. I hope you die of cancer +Talkpage Please do not edit my talkpage. +I think your list is quite good (but I might be biased since practically all of the malls listed under California already meet those criteria). What does everyone else think? +" ch-ch-ch-China let's dialogue about this wonderful edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.46.38 " +Good, thanks for the advise, it is really useful. I will transclude the nomination in the morning. +You aren't helping matters. Please just let it drop.- [talk] +This citations are not mine but their respective owner. But that wouldn't make any different from the rest of your claims. Britannica and NYTimes seems to me and rest of the world as very good sources specially from that time. This section talks about history of Montenegrin language and is natural that referrer to the period of time from the past. From other hand we had claims in this article that Montenegrin language is thing of later years but when we see Britannica Encyclopedia from 1911 we see that people of Montenegro indeed called their language with their name. Why that period is important? Its very simple to me, its important because it shows that Serbian hegemony had as goal to stop development of Montenegrin culture and specially language. Except for last sentence you are mentioning that indeed sounds very sad, when I realize that because of Serbian occupation they didn't have University until 1974, nation who had printing press just few years after Gutenberg invention, that makes even that sentence acceptable to me but I would understand that is POV and could be writen better. 76.114.213.50 +arrrh, forgot signink of postink -( +Unentilted Hey Static, um it's me with your answer. +No. If the NHC (or some other part of NOAA) says something on the subject, that'd be worth mentioning. But as it is, it's a third-hand statement. |✎ +" Changed the wording, but it still needs work. Is there any satisfactory way to cite DVD material, other than point at where it is? I can find a few review sites that comment on the dog costume, but they're usually very long and have just one line on it. Incidentally, if someone used the term ""Alien cubed"" at me and meant it, I'd hit them. " +"20, 15 April 2008 (UTC) It's a quote from Jimbo Wales Ha, as if anyone takes notice of this! I would be deleting content 24/7 if this was a policy. I add {{fact}} because several times as soon as I deleted the content was re-added immediately, still without citation. However, I think that in stubs citations are not crucial because they rarely have sufficient content to warrant the research. (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 11:" +Suck it. Bitch, suck my bigass cock, gag on it motherfucker. I didn't vandalize shit, you bitchass punks in your Administrator's clique think you're the motherfucking bomb and shit, but you ain't got shit and you sure as all hell don't know shit. Fuck, if I took a dump and put it on my keyboard the fucking shit would come up with a better contribution than you motherfucking gestopoing up in this bitch. +This is an absolutely unprecedented proposal within ethnography or anthropology. Please show evidence where one group's indigenousness is evaluated based on inclusion of another group. +Unspecified source for Image:ThEvansWiki-1-.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:ThEvansWiki-1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? +" Howdy. Yeah, there are many guitarists to work on here, almost too many! I wish we had more volunteers in the project, but we are just getting it off the ground again so hopefully we can attract some new members. I would be happy to mentor that user you mentioned, or you could ask , who is an experienced and capable user. All the centralized discussion for the Guitarists WikiProject just would take place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guitarists. So, if you have general questions about guitarist articles or the project, you can ask there. Our project banner doesn't have an Importance parameter. If you look at Template:WikiProject Guitarists/doc, it tells you what options are available and how to use them. There is ""class"" and ""attention"", and then two optional task forces you can set to ""yes"" if they apply. I'd be happy to look at Derek Trucks but I'm not sure exactly what I'm looking for. ♫ talk " +your decision to edit +" If a group of Christians kill a Hindu, do you think it matters if Hindus are majority in the state? Don't think you are propagating the lie that only ""majority kills minority""? No! Only ""local majority"" kills ""local minority"". If you want to somehow show that terrorism/separation movement is not religious in nature, then you might as well show me data about how some planets are changing my future, or that evolution is wrong.talk " +You seriously suck giant cock Onorem. +" Well, not that i don't appreciate what you said, but even so, allow me to reply. Today there were the funerals of Enzo Biagi, a freeman as few remains in a world more and more without any respect for freedom (seen as a 'threat for the established order'). The oil price is flying to 100$ and this should led to think more seriously to our absurd world. But let's go: 1-there is someone that is costantly pointed at the 'words' while others are pointed on 'facts'. Since you call my comment 'above' as non-polite, obviously you miss why i could be not friendly with someone that not miss a time to complain in Arbcom every time we discuss in any sense. This is 'polite' and wikilove for you? To me it not looks so. Since i am a volonteer here, not payed (as all the collaborators as well), you cannot pretent i act like all the conformists here have established, and obey to Bzuk or BillCJ every time saying 'yes master, yes master, like you want master'. And surely i wouldn't take EH as 'bright example'. Sorry, the manner in which they acted not displays any reasonable friendly-acting. So it's hard pretend to me to be so kind with gentlemen that not even bothers to explain why they does this and that revert. 2-Another thing that show dramatically well some things: Take for instance, the first paragraph after the header ""Technical description""...the paragraph ends with the sentence ""the only real all-around fighter that served in AMI, but this was not without limitation in every task."" That's a very subjective statement, and, since it's making a judgement, it really needs a citation so that the reader can understand what the source of that statement is. As it stands right now, however, because it is not cited, it merely looks like opinion on your part, which would be right to remove/revert. All the G.91R page explains continuosly why this plane was 'limited' and 'mainly successful as recce'. I cannot understand how this thing, considering all the datas and stuff given, can be 'questioned'. Rather than criticize me just try to get a look about the JAS-39 Gripen. Basically, questioning this fact shows apalling comprension for all the article, because it's a statement well placed inside the meaning of this work. 3-Washing your hands and not bother about to collaborate with me is not surely a 'nice' manner to do. Strangely enough, this is 'justified', rather than be a guilth. So, basically, every thing i do or not do is wrong, while every thing you do or not do is right. With these bases, expecting a costructive dialogue is just funny. You have been 'offensed' by the vanification of F-104S adjustements (because i after done some more contr.). This is the only thing you did in over a month of 'collaboration'. Too easy, my dear, to self justify all times like you. Easy not bothering to collaborate, while the guilth is mine that already lost my time to contribue gratis to this ency. 4-My contributions should be alway quoted here and that. But being serious, there are a lot of pages without any or almost any references. I dont' understand why i should be whipped to post 500 kb. The issue about F-86 data touched the buttom of the sea and dig it too. I cannot cope with someone that not even read online sources with absurd reasons. 5-The continuos accuses, diffamations and so on about me are not liked either. Perhaps the problem is that Wikipedia takes herself too seriously in the last times? Perhaps that be called 'traitor' or 'harmer' is not friendly? Obviously you rate these accusation as 'righful critics'. But not i. I remember very well that you accused me without any proof to make copyviols, even with funny interpretations of Goebel PD text (that i stated as not mine, the only time i used other texts in all the MB written for the sake of Wiki). I wouldn't have a judge like you in the real world, believe me. 6-The fantastic wikioz world, 'tooooo perfect' to be 'questioned'. But to me and some others, this looks not exactly true. There are a lot of burocrats, hipocrites and trolls, or simply there are a lot of guys that basically fears the others and are ready to 'defend the Revolution' with zealot fanatism. Questioning even the basical celebral activity and even the basical freedom of spreech, questioning even the simply syllogism. All this is due because, as always in these cases, from French revolution today there are always many 'revolutionary guards' ready to show their 'loyalty' to the 'cause'. So wikipedia prefers executes guys 'out of the chor' instead to admit to have some 'contradictions'. This is the usual manner to act. And i have no love to who call me 'wiki.harmer' just because i show that i 'know' my stuff, not only 'have read it somewhere'. This is why Goebel and many others keeps away from +" US 11 NY map Hey. Because of a flaw in the FHWA data, part of the highlighted route on File:US 11 (NY) map.svg is actually NY 11C. The FHWA data never flipped the alignments of US 11 and NY 11C when they were flipped in 1992. Could you correct the map to show US 11 on the direct highway instead? (see ) Thanks. – TF " +Thanks again, just need to try and establish notability now. Does their bands featuring in major magazines, appearing in support of notable bands count as notability? Or would I have to create the individual band pages first? +List-generation from categories Hi there. Thanks for the earthquake list. Is the generation of such lists quite easy? I'm trying to reduce making such lists to a one-click operation. Would I have to use the same set-up you did, or are there other ways. Someone mentioned AWB once. +" The statements in the lead are not only non-neutral, they are slanderous: The first sentence frames the quote ""wanting to play the game too much"" as a direct quote from the EA spokesperson, which is false. It is nowhere to be found in the original statement; this is in fact Destructoid's interpretation. The second sentence victimizes the users. This does not belong in the article, let alone the Lead. For describing EA's statement, I feel that leaving out a comment on ""players were having such a good time"" would be better because the phrase is ambiguous. Personally, I see it as PR used to express that the game keeps people happy for long periods of time. Other sources see it more maliciously. It is so open to interpretation that trying to write about it would not be neutral. For the entire description, I would write: ""Senior producer Kip Katsarelis commented that the game servers were consistently at maximum capacity, which has made it difficult for new users to connect."" What do you think? " +The truth The truth is never unconstructive +Great song, incredibly innovative, highly psychdelic. +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ''''''[talk] " +COI You truly are a nasty piece of work. I suggest you leave Northwest alone and heed his warnings. +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ~81(C) " +" Happy holi day! St Pat's Indian style BUUuu!!!! " +Peer review article on Irish people? The additions and editions made on this page even within recent weeks - especily photos - has vastly improved it, to the better I think. Would you support it being submitted for a peer review, and help tidy it up/add some more? +" Page Protection Per a request filed at requests for page protection, this page has been protected from editing until unsolved issues are resolved. Please try and keep the conversation civil, and let's find a clear solution everyone can agree one. 17 " +" The fact you didn't use the proper ""sight"" makes me really doubt your credibility. " +Well at least Richard did not tell me to stick in my ear this time. So when Richard isn't making a bigger mess and protecting some editors like Esoglou while reprimanding other editors for like behavior (i.e. Leadwind) he's telling people to do thing like assume good faith and be civil yet in this link you can see that he's allowed to get frustrated but no one else is . Please. +" I'd love to hear your reasoning about how I'm ""hurting myself"". Physically? Emotionally? Mentally? My ""wiki reputation""? If so, you have much more to worry about than I do - learn the difference between your and you're. I'm not vandalizing anything - I stated Crumbsucker did not spell well and changed justified text to unjustified text (which are facts, as evidenced by his edits)." +Another ridiculous article by WikiPedia == Your section on how to define area is as vague as most of your other articles. Area is easy to define: It is the product of two averages. Volume is not 'analogous' to area - whoever wrote this, needs to look up the word analogous. Volume is defined as the product of three averages. It is also accurate to say that area has no extent - just like a point or line. Area only begins to take on understandable dimensions once a point or line is assigned extent. As an example: If a line is made up of 3 points of zero extent, it's length is zero. If it is made up of 3 points whose centers are half a unit from the circumference of a circle formed around the same, then the line has length of 3 units. More ridiculous articles: Fundamental theorem of Calculus, Proof that 0.999... = 1 and Infinitesimals. 98.195.24.26 == +You are employing common-sense psychology in a thought experiment that turns on accepting a one-shot thermodynamic counterfactual at the very base of the physics, namely the low-entropy initial condition or fluctuation. But an ambient nebular plasmic Kaspar Hauser, like a typing monkey, might learn English by accident. Say 10-1000000000000000000. The thesis is that this is vastly more likely than the entire low entropy state of solar system, earth, water, iron and rivers that you require for the education of your African village child. The latter process unfolds in a more thermodynamically plausible way once it starts, but its initial condition is far less likely than a single nebular coincidence brain. That is the thesis anyway.178.38.152.228 +user talk: Grizzlybear82 Please refrain from adding crap to my talk page. +This comic illustrator is different from most, right now, in the sense that he has a Wikipedia article. A very specific portion of webcomic artists have their own Wikipedia articles; the rest are covered in the pages for their respective comics. Is there really anything to be said about Scott that can't be (or indeed, isn't already being) covered in the VGCats article? +Of course it's official. It's been announced by the BBC. Tony Sidaway +Hi Aoystreck, thanks for contributing to helping make this article better. Spelling and grammar (notably 'though' and apostrophe's), - I spell checked the entire article and I think that I corrected all the spelling mistakes, and the apostrophes. Spoliers, - I'm undecided on what to do for this problem. I do agree, that saying to much about scenes being filmed is a give away, but I think that occasionally mentioning what type of a scene is being filmed should be noted, for example; mentioning when and where they filmed scene's with what cast members, and occasionally mention a notable set-up or notable scene being filmed. Plot summary - I'm not sure if you cited this as a problem, but think that the 'plot section' has a reasonable amount of information (and plot points throughout the development and writing section) because both cast and crew released this information to the public domain, via interviews, statements - etc, so I think that it should be mention, because if the information wasn't suppose to be known then they wouldn't have stated it. You also said that these three problems are among others, If you could, could you please cite other problems with this page so that I could fix them. +" Thanks, Trusilver. I will give it some thought. I learned a lot from my self-nom effort, responding as I was to some Signpost announcements about the need for more admins. If I did it again per your nom, I'd articulate better that my main interest is keeping the walls and floors around here free of extraneous stuff. I've ended up doing more vandal patrolling than anything over the years, though I like creating the (very) occasional article, uploading photo files to illustrate articles that need them and making small improvements where I see the need. I've been a sysop elsewhere and elsewhen, so it's not something I see as some kind of crown, but really as an appointment as janitor. I like leaving the place clean without a trace of my own effort. Besides, what I really have to think about is whether I'd be a part of any club that would accept me as a member, to paraphrase Mr. Marx. I'll get back to you when I've had a think. Who, me? " +yes, what PamD says is what I understand to be our usual practice. It helps people find articles. You'll notice the first line of the article gives the alternate name in parenthesis, as it should. But redirects can cover every possibility; I think it would even be ok to create a redirect from the form you propose, in case anyone should happen to type it. '''''' ( talk ) +=[ You evil nerds make kittens cry. +" THIS ACCOUNT IS THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111 ACCOUNT. A MORONIC TROLL HAS SET UP ACCOUNTS ON THE WEB WITH MY USERNAME & FALSE IDS, WHICH AREN'T ME BUT A CHILDISH ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE ME WITH SLURS & A FAKE PHOTO. CHECK JOIN DATE; 2006 NOT 2011. HE IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION & SO WORRIED ABOUT IT HE IS CREATING ACCOUNTS ASKING IF HE COULD BE IN TROUBLE. HE IS. THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111/112 ACCOUNTS ARE ON HERE. CHECK MY DEVIANTART PROFILE, SET UP IN 2006 THIS ACCOUNT IS THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111 ACCOUNT. A MORONIC TROLL HAS SET UP ACCOUNTS ON THE WEB WITH MY USERNAME & FALSE IDS, WHICH AREN'T ME BUT A CHILDISH ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE ME WITH SLURS & A FAKE PHOTO. CHECK JOIN DATE; 2006 NOT 2011. HE IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION & SO WORRIED ABOUT IT HE IS CREATING ACCOUNTS ASKING IF HE COULD BE IN TROUBLE. HE IS. THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111/112 ACCOUNTS ARE ON HERE. Some of these uploads are music, some are comedy, some are anti BNP/EDL. None are espousing a particular movement, political group or ideology. However, due to the fact that I espouse equality and fairness & am opposed to unwarranted victimisation, oppression of minorities, hatred and ignorance it seems that certain users like to think of it as a soapbox to spew their racist, misogynistic, homophobic, xenophobic and hate-filled gibberish....the BNPers, of course, are guilty of all the aforementioned. Apparently my decision not to allow comments that are basically spam, lazy insults, illiterate ramblings and screeching from morons who don't listen (but just use the channel as their own forum) means I am anti free speech. I don't think our ancestors fought against fascism and for the right for freedom of speech to have hate-filled knuckle draggers abuse that by screeching hate-filled drivel bereft of facts, decency or, indeed, a point. I do actively encourage freedom of speech for all, quite often letting idiots speak makes them look far more idiotic than I ever could hope. There is a difference between debate and spamming, insulting, not listening and preaching though. I'm happy to debate, but a debate consists of two sides discussing their views, not one shouting and refusing to listen to anyone else. It is my channel and I have the right not to allow trolls, clones, neo Nazis, racists, haters and all round ne'er do wells the right to puke bile all over it....this is not suppression of freedom of speech and if anyone cares to look back through my channel they will see I actively encourage debate, but also see how so many choose to eschew debate in favour of: 1. Attempting to belittle, hurl abuse and calling me UAF/Marxist/far left/rapist/paedophile with absolutely no basis (libelous in reality). 2. Personal insults, accusing me of being a foreigner, bringing my family into it (they love a ""mum"" insult) and accusing me of being several users because they can't believe more than one person can disagree. 3. Misquoting, paraphrasing and cherry picking ""research"" from questionable sources and only ever ""research"" or accept sources that back up their own beliefs. 4. Lying, accusing me of acts I haven't done and claiming they have ""won"" the argument when they have ignored the points I raised and just harped on and on. 5. Cloning my account on here and also using my username on far right forums. They have cloned me numerous times. 6. Waffling on about being deprived of freedom of speech (to make insults and allow no right to reply by blocking me from their channels) Basically, these goons make up a tiny minority of incredibly arrogant, ignorant, spiteful, indecent, amoral, borderline illiterate joy sappers; BNP, EDL, neo Nazis, Islamophobes, extremists, KKK, you name it. THEY are what is wrong with the world and they are what is trying to stop us evolving; their motivation is hatred and ignorance....proven by their labelling of everyone who disagrees with them as communists, UAF, Marxists and Liberals (and more unbelievably fascists?!?) with no basis. Of course, they are just lazy epithets to group the majority into one category when their opposition is made up of a multitude of individuals from left to right, of different coloured skin and beliefs, sexualities, classes, background etc....the majority basically. Youtube grants these guttersnipes the anonymity to parade their ignorance and disgusting ideals and appear to be a larger group than they are. They are fooling themselves though, they will always be a minority of failures who blame their own failure in life on everyone but themselves. Ironically, our ancestors who fought for every freedom they treasure now are having it spat back in their face with every ill informed, erroneous, indecent and anti educational rant these idiots post. I encourage debate, NOT bickering, childish playground taunts or interminable clowns on their soapbox refusing to list +" Now i'm giving you a friendly piece of advice: Do your homework!!. If you actually looked, my files are in the public domain. And, frankly, it has nothing to do with you about my plans and if I am discussing it.  • Talk " +You could reply to my response to the question you posted on the article talk page perhaps. - (resonate) +As for conspiracies against Syria... +" Context? Is the use of ""stat"" in a medical context specific to the U.S.? Can someone say if this is used in hospitals in the UK?" +" Welcome to Wikipedia! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. My name is . I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to the free encyclopedia anybody can edit. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, feel free to leave me a message on my talk/chat page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages to help you. The left column contains tutorials and introductory pages while the right shows ways to help out Wikipedia.   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   Manual of Style   Write an article   Fight vandalism   Improve illustrations and upload new images   Perform maintenance tasks   Become member of a project that interests you   Fun Stuff... Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Again, welcome! ) Chat " +> ...and the band was one of the most famous of the 1980s. This may be true, but my own experience I never heard of them. U2 seemed pretty famous, and the Rolling Stones. Perhaps it is meant that they were famous in Japan? +HELP WIKIPEDIA BECOME GOOD AGAIN [] Click on there now and choose an era of musical bands/performers/artists/songwriters you want to do. If we have enough people we can amke wikipedia better for good. Send this round to alot of people....:) or tell me how to. I gone mental on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_death_metal_bands +Hey you fucking nigger whore, I'm removing completely false information. BAN FORTHCOMING! +" This is one of those cases in which a noun title would be needlessly complex. ""Barefoot"" gets the idea across far better than any possible noun or noun phrase could. (""Barefootedness"" would be the most direct noun form and it's silly to add the suffixes when the root adjective works just fine.) Oppose move; the article is clearly about more than just the lifestyle of people who regularly go barefoot. There is information about barefootedness in sports, and as punishment, and in the arts. T " +So, which one of you got paid to whitewash this article free from info on the stage collapse? I can't be arsed to use WikiScanner to find out, but it's good to see that Bluesfest can afford to hire PR firms for truthiness services. - +========== Regarding your comments on my revision of the Endicott-Johnson page that you started Nimur wrote: I am considering creating a separate article for the Carousels of the southern tier. I have some old photographs of the Carousels (I believe it was a 75th anniversary celebration, circa 1999). I am wondering if we should create a separate article (given that the region is known as the Carousel Capitol of the World). Otherwise, I can post them here, or in the respective city articles. Let me know what you think. Thanks for your excellent content and edits, Mahatmabenfoo! Nimur Mahatmabenfoo replied: Hi, Nimur! I can't figure out yet how to contact you, so hopefully you will read this. First, thanks for the compliments! I don't live in Johnson City anymore, but I have an ongoing interest in the area, and visit it periodically. I have a collection of pictures and postcards of the E-J plants, but I haven't learned to upload them yet. A separate article about the Carousel Capitol of the World makes sense. Many people who will be interested in the Carousels of the triple cities will have little interest in E-J who's factories are now mostly long gone. I suggest you leave the very short treatment I gave the subject (as an enduring legacy of Endicott-Johnson), but yes, yes! a link to a separate more in depth article would be terrific. There's a lot to say about Carousels generally, and what percentage of the total of wood carved ones are in the Triple Cities area, and all that. I'll happily leave all that to you, and I'll be happy to send you what research I have on the chance you will want to use it. For example, how's this as an amazing bunch of (what are probably) facts: Between 1880 and 1930, the golden age of carousels, over 10,000 were built. Fewer than 200 remain and six of them are in Broome County! Nationwide only 13 carousels remain at the site where they were originally built, five of those are in Broome County (the Highland Park carousel was originally at Ideal Park now the site of U-E football stadium). [from a web article by rc@tier.net] Feel free to email me directly tilyou 1@ @ao l.com [remove spaces] Charles +This page should not be speedy deleted because... This page should not be speedy deleted because... (i removed user information) +Try reading instead of deleting. I am NOT Moon, I am a client of his. Who are you, and why are you so intent on hijacking this page? +You removed my previous comment, and then when I reverted it and flagged you the same way you flagged me, you tried to erase that evidence. I don't see how your actions have been much better. +I won't fight the block as it's well deserved, but it would be nice if someone would attempt to prevent Soosim from tampering with the Paul Murphy info. He's been modifying the context of that statement in order to support the idea (false?) presented above that the convoy's main focus is bringing bulk food to Gaza, rather than things like medical supplies. This (Israeli?) misinformation has been repeated in news media and on this site. It is completely untrue. I know you don't have much reason to by sypmathetic with me due to my anti-Semetic trolling (*I* thought it was funny....) but my edits, with the exception of one where I was unaware of policy and had never heard of the guy (Howard Jacobson delete attempt), are in keeping with the spirit of wiki. The sentence Soosim keeps removing is accurate and has been properly sourced. Please, if you can find it within you, defend this information's integrity from the swarm of POV editors circling that page. +:Image:Clotrimazole-3D-vdW.png Only 3 Carbons should be in the imidazole ring. I took it down temporarily from Clotrimazole, you can put it back after you redraw it. +You are asshole master of deletions 22:18, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+685)‎ . . User talk:PatGallacher ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Patricia Walsh) (current) 22:18, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+299)‎ . . Patricia Walsh ‎ (Nominated page for deletion using Page Curation (subst:blp-prod)) 22:11, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+184)‎ . . Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism ‎ (Reporting Novaranist. (TW)) 22:10, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (-33)‎ . . m Hans Kohala ‎ (Reverted 1 edit by Novaranist (talk) to last revision by Severo. (TW)) (current) 22:08, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (-82)‎ . . Most Extreme Airports ‎ (current) 22:04, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+861)‎ . . N User talk:Matt8600 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Iustin beldie) 22:03, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+678)‎ . . N User talk:Timostaurus ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Scott Wornow) 22:01, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+829)‎ . . N User talk:Mason Decker1 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Mario Kart/Characters) (current) 21:58, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+877)‎ . . N User talk:Nathanielpopoca ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Nathaniel Popoca) 21:57, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+865)‎ . . N User talk:Iustin444 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Matei Berceanu) (current) 21:56, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+417)‎ . . User talk:Novaranist ‎ (Only warning: Vandalism. (TW)) 21:54, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+858)‎ . . N User talk:Zachlyda ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Zachary Lyda) (current) 21:53, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+836)‎ . . N User talk:Novaranist ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Pornography in North Korea) 21:49, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+8)‎ . . User:Tentinator/Articles Created ‎ (current) 21:48, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+143)‎ . . N User:Tentinator/Articles Created ‎ (←Created page with 'This is a list of all the articles that I've created. First Catilinarian Conspiracy Second Catilinarian Conspiracy In Toga Candida') 21:35, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+861)‎ . . N User talk:Jaylentable ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Beautybaby44) (current) 20:12, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+883)‎ . . N User talk:Conservationscience ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Conservation evidence) (current) 20:12, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+844)‎ . . N User talk:Prasadaman ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Aman prasad) (current) 20:11, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+1,737)‎ . . User talk:Liberalufp ‎ (Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Word windowism. (TW)) 16:38, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+788)‎ . . N User talk:Lunedeep ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Lune deep) 16:16, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+830)‎ . . User talk:Blackiedog ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for List of King Kongs) 15:58, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+917)‎ . . N User talk:Giovz17 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Special/wiki/Special:Preferences) (current) 15:57, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+838)‎ . . N User talk:Jarmanpreet Sandhu ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Jarmanpreet sandhu) (current) 11:31, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+886)‎ . . N User talk:Rpriykant ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Moneyroot Consultancy) (current) 10:53, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+808)‎ . . N User talk:Pregish ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Pergasus Syangbo) 10:36, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+645)‎ . . N User talk:Shresthaprabhu ‎ (General note: Removal of content, blanking. (TW)) (current) 10:33, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+850)‎ . . N User talk:Espabangalore ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Elements spa) (current) 10:33, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+855)‎ . . N User talk:Jadurkupi ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Music marketing) (current) 10:16, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+700)‎ . . User talk:Jb1944 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for John Alderton (medic)) 10:03, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+791)‎ . . User talk:Hikogaratashi ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Brooks kossover) (current) +- our shared history is FAR more colourful and better than the narrow-minded stuff they expouse. Having said that loyalists too should accept the other half of their roots as well as accept that their ancestors owe alot to Irish nationalism +" == Ocelot kitten picture? I actually think that ""kitten"" is an adult Margay. It can be very difficult to tell the difference though." +" Telejustice A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Telejustice, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . " +Lewes The county town of Sussexs is not quite so straightfoward. Assizes were held in both Chichester and Lewes, and the county town swapped between them several times. I don't have the details on this though. +" You probably don't know/understand this, being new here, but being warned about NPA and such is actually an administrative step. More specifically, if there's an established pattern of personal attacks, it's the last thing that happens right before you get a ""you've been temporarily blocked, have a nice day"" message from an admin. I understand that you're upset about the AFD, but please remain civil, because a block isn't going to make things any easier for you. - " +ZORDANLIGHTER and Whistlingwoods socks of user Vvarkey. +Different Intros The original HBO airings of Spicy City have an intro showing lipstick markings. Here is a video recorded from an original HBO airing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_wZSiB4vhE. Later airings on Teletoon (like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSlrv2bQPhI) and 2×2 (like this one: http://rutube.ru/video/2df0af7d31b61427efbcbc77a099d27a/) use a different intro, replacing the lips with a heart. Does anyone know what the reason for this is? +" Your email. ""The fact that Ryan engages in 'cock foreplay' indicates that he is probably a homosexual.""" +Also, what in the article did you view as not based on reliable sources? It seemed as well sourced or better than similar articles here. +" October 2008 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pugs. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ~ " +I think (but am not certain) that italics are normally used. The troublesome word for the crowd numbers is regularly. Do you have any figures for average attendances in this period? Its a minor point though. +" Garbage picking article renaming You previously opposed a merger of the garbage picking article. Well, now someone wants to rename the article ""dumpster diving"" which I feel is not a good idea as it's not inclusive of the various situations discussed in the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Garbage_picking#Requested_move_31_August_2015 He already did the renaming once without any consensus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Garbage_picking#Garbage_Picking_to_Dumpster_Diving_Move.2Frename_should_be_reverted. I thought you might not have seen the requested move and might wish to have your say one way or another. Thanks. " +" I see what you're saying about the sources and all, but it still seems like it's somewhat arbitrary what they will consider to be ""enough"" reliable sources. All in all, the mass nominations have kinda taken the wind out of my sails; I was hoping to create a slew of articles on seduction-related subjects but it seems not worth the effort if it can all be destroyed via deletion at the whim of whoever shows up to AfD. I think there is a systemic bias going on here, and the system has created the means by which people's personal opinions can affect what Wikipedia covers and what it doesn't. If we got rid of the notability requirement and just allowed all verifiable content to stay here, then it would create a much more objective system and we wouldn't have all these problems. Having said that, I'm well-aware of the unlikelihood of that happening and am basically waving the white flag at this point. " +" That may be, but Wikipedia:Writing better articles says ""Avoid using jargon whenever possible"". Here it's possible - just write descendants. This is an article with very broad appeal. Why use discipline-specific jargon when a perfectly good common-use synonym is available? I see no answer, unless one is a genealogy nerd keen to push his interest on others... but I'm sure that's not the case... " +The other St. Nicholas Croatian Catholic Church I removed this image of St. Nicholas Croatian Catholic Church, because that's not the one located at 1326 East Ohio Street. The church in that picture is located at 24 Maryland Avenue in Millvale, Pennsylvania. The one in Millvale is on the National Register of Historic Places. But there's a different, older church with the same name located at 1326 East Ohio Street (this was the original location of the congregation, which later moved farther down the road to the other church in Millvale). The one on East Ohio Street is on the List of Pittsburgh Landmarks. It also was in the news not that long ago, because a road project is being discussed nearby and some people want to make sure it gets saved because it's supposedly the site of the first Croatian Catholic Church in the United States, and some folks want to turn it into a museum. +Universidades y Colegios I would like to invite you to check out the userboxes that I have created in Wikipedia! If your Collge/University is not there feel free to make create one or let me known and I'll make it (User: Lufthmark) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Education/Mexico +I just hope I'm talkin' to the RickK who's got the good fortune to be given a job here when, with his ignorance, arrogance and downright cheek, wouldn't be employed by anyone with an ounce of sense! Dave +The reason it all happens in your talk page, is because you blocked a user (Fab Four) that many don't agree that he deserved to be blocked. M.V.E.i. +Well that is not the case, almost every writer/ comedian is known as English/Welsh or Scottish, except Ricky and Stephen Merchant. Ricky should be stated as a English comedian, in the introduction. In the infobox under nationality it should be British. +I'm with you too, hey we should petition to get Montanabw kicked out or punished or something for being so dominating and not letting anyone else do anything on wiki +The article has reliable sources, a book written on the subject and is notable. +Goal Count I don't understand people that don't understand that the appearances and goals are for domestic league matches only. IT SAYS IT RIGHT THERE. Stop putting that he scored one goal and played two matches. It was a friendly and it doesn't count. I am Mexican, but I am sure the people that keep changing the goal amount are mexicans, but they are too stupid and proud. STOP DOING IT! +You now have been reported for your vandalism. '''''' +Fyi (and I really don't think I should need to have to point this out) my goal in this case was simply to help provide genuinely reliable information on Wikipedia in a clinically relevant topic. That's to say, in the knowledge that patients really do come to Wikipedia as a source of information, and that the information they find may influence their decisions. However, I'm human and my patience has its limits. Right now it's seething. I should say that in other circumstances I would be happy to hear your advice on how to use those templates. But here, I'm afraid it all rings hollow. Whenever did I mention a block? (Fwiw, I might well have supported a limited topic ban, if I'd prioritize ANI over tidying a new article [Wikipedia_talk:MED#New_article:_Dutch_hypothesis].) Anyway, I did my best, and that's that. And I've got bitten for my pains. But I sometimes feel that's pretty much par for the course when trying to help out on anything controversial (however relevant its implications) on Wikipedia. A real trap, imo. +" I'm a Vikes fan at heart but I give credit when credit is due, and the dirty birds have given me millions of ""what if"" thoughts over the game." +I DIDNT DO ANYTHING YOU MORON. OCCASSIONALY from time to time i edit f1 pages to update them when needed sometimes the colour may be wrong but i try my best because usually no one does it. So stop being a prick +And who are you to decide my comment is pointless? By the way things look I could easily say the same for your whole argument.198.228.200.150 +"If you want to assert that Theron herself identifies as ""South African-born American"" or ""South African American"", you will need to provide a reference which quotes her so identifying, just as required for ethnicity in WP:BLPCAT. " +" Requested move Japanophilia → Japanophilia — We name the article after the topic that it discusses. And what it discusses is Japanophilia. Because that's what all of the sources that it is based upon are discussing. They aren't discussing a Japanophile. They are discussing the phenomenon of Japanophilia.The previous is a quote from Survey Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions. Discussion Any additional comments:" +{{Spoken Wikipedia In Progress | | } +You're both morons. David Levy, you're the ONLY person with a problem with the move, so I'm not sure what consensus you're referring to. Scorpion, relatively popularity is meaningless. They both have the same name. Ergo, there should be a disambiguation page. Since neither of you seems to have a clue, I'm not going to waste my time here anymore. Good luck with your fan page, idiot. And good luck with your fascism, Levy. +" Talkback The Chamar debacle Good to see that someone tries to introduce a bit of civilized discussion in this mess! Just for your information, Bal537 has been sent off for three days, as may be seen from this old version of his talk page, which he chose to blank soon afterwards. So he won't be joining the debate until Monday. Cheers, No question. Yeah, I just realized that. Should we give advice about the article being up for deletion anyway? ' talk Might aswell. I've left a short message on the user's talk page. Feel free to add any other advice ) ' talk WikiBreak I am taking a wikibreak due to travel and will be back by 20th of this month. (previously no section)MJ sales could you edit michael jacksons sales please here is a list which say he has sold 750 million thanks Hey man Hey, I just wanted to drop you a line so you knew I didn't drop off the face of the earth. I was busy as hell helping out my sister and getting ready for my trip so didn't get online till you were already off tonight. I'm going to be gone until Monday for a job interview/convention but I'll be back Monday ) I'll check into Wikipedia while I'm gone but probably won't be able to get onto irc. Hi! Hi, Nice to see that you have copied some of the code of my nav template and chzz's subpage display code. Good work, . Talkback Nice to see that you are really getting interested in templates day by day. Talkback |This is ACC I have requested an account on the ACC account creation interface. Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. talk Thank you! " +coming out of the [[closet +You might pause to consider the possibility that 8 editors and counting removing the text, plus an OTRS ticket, might mean there's something in it. The rest can wait til tomorrow and/or for somebody else. WP:IMPERFECT. talk +leari CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND ARREST ME...SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA, CHULA VISTA, FUCKING GET YOUR INFORMATION RIGHT FAGGOT SHITHEAD!!i CAN STILL POST WITH THIS COMPUTER...I SAID BLOCK ME, COME THE FUCK DOWN HERE AND +1939, 1939 merely signifes when Eastern/Western total wars overlap simultaneously, nothing more +" Clarification Would you mind filing a request for clarification re: the injunction due to the confusion at LM's talk page? I'm really not good with these kind of things. Thanks, – (talk) " +The question said there was $2 in equity I just used it. Whoever wrote the problem did something which made no sense. He took All the Risk Weighted Assets then took out the liabilities. Imagine I had $5 in cash and $1 in liabilities. Lets say the cash had no risk. Then according to you I have negative equity. Because the person that did it took Risk Weighted Assets IE 0 and minused liabilities IE 1 so the sum - 1 I did it correctly. Its Equity or capital divided by RWA. +The truth isnt vandalismI'm sorry you support a terrorist +Minor Additions The article has not been updated in almost a year, so I just updated two lines to refer to Parascandola's current projects and his current personal life. +I fail to see how your own speculation or opinion have any bearing on the relivance of this statement. It's a sourced statement. Did it really happen the way it said in the book? what qualification do any of us have to question that? Right now we have information from a book versus your thoughts. I don't see a conflict. I continualy see an arguement from this stand point: I don't think it is absolutly crucial to have this info on this article so it has to be deleted. Since Jimbo Wales has said that he invisions wikipedia as a place where the sum of all human knowledge can be found I would say: When in doubt, leave the info. +" So, Jimbo's wrong and I'm wrong, but you're right ? Not so sure about that. either way, policy already forbids advertising. So we already have a policy in place that says no to it, and policy trumps consensus. SO tell me again how you're right ? @-► Talk to the Vorlons►Moon Base Alpha-@ " +" Lead I changed the former introductory phrase (""Ion Victor Antonescu was a Romanian soldier, authoritarian politician and convicted war criminal.') for the following reasons: the fact that he was a soldier is not the most important from his CV. According to Britannica: ""Ion Antonescu, (born June 15, 1882, Pitești, Rom.—died June 1, 1946, near Jilava), Romanian marshal and statesman who became dictator of the pro-German government during World War II."" in my opinion the reference to his execution for war crimes does not belong to the first sentence (see other articles about war crimininals: Albert Wass, Constantin Petrovicescu, Visarion Puiu) " +OK, good, we can move the location of the outline. We can also collapse the prose if you like. +" I find the article very dubious. It should be totally reviewed 40% of the habitants of Algiers. this article says there is about 2 million Kabilians around Algeria. 40% of Algiers is about 2 millions. Officialy there is no ethnic statistics in Algeria, it's not a racist state (nor a racist people), so no one can tell the real percentage off Negroes or Kabylians or Arabs or Turkish people in Algiers or anywhere else in Algeria. ""Since the Berber Spring in 1980, ... recognition of the Berber languages and secularism (""laïcité"") in Algeria"" obsolete statement, representing a personal PoV. ""and as Kabylie in French"" this is English Wikipedia, who cares about it's french name. It is referred as Kabylia in Anglo-Saxon literature link. About Jughurtha, I asked for some resources on the main page, if you can find some. about Genetics: the Haplogroup J (Y-DNA) found with important proportions (10%) in Kabylia is Semitic(not Neolithic as the article says) Pottery isn't more representative than an orientalist painting from a well known painter, and it's more offensive in my opinion. " +AM CENSORED ON THE TALKPAGE***''' +" I have restored the page to 12 August 2010 10:25pm EST " +WikiProject Tyrol Hello. I was informed that you actively worked in the past on articles related to South Tyrol. You are invited to share your thoughts on a Wikiproject Tyrol. Regards +I'd be happy to accept some authority for the compromise. I get that stuff changes, birds, planets, etc. I just don't think that's what Wikipedia should be doing: acting as a compromising entity to appease editors. +There has been plenty of discussion at Talk:List of surviving veterans of World War I, and a recent deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of surviving veterans of World War I which decided to keep it. You must not edit war to enforce your own wish against the consensus decision of the community. Once your block is lifted, you must discuss it on the article Talk page if want to change anything - but as the AfD was so recent, you'd need to come up with some new argument +About misrepresentation, Ernst and fighting: I remember that incident I think, but missed that two editors had been banned. Wow - who were they? talk|contribs| +I agree with you somewhat. You shouldn't be blocker for three reverting an asshole. ► ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ +Allow me to make one thing clear - I do not care whether or not My New calculus is published on Wikipedia. No one takes Wikipedia seriously anyway. I discussed it because I was asked. In fact I have been discussing the topic of infinitesimals and kept returning to the topic. Besides, what's preventing you from deleting all these edits? I expect that's exactly what will happen eventually. Your assertion that the statement is true only whenever the right hand side exists is false. This statement refers to symbolic derivatives and of course both sides must exist for it to be true, not only the right hand side. The propositional logic applies both ways, that is, given f' + g', it must be true that it equals (f+g)' and vice versa. 12.176.152.194 +" Thanks for removing the copyrighted text. Happy editing, (talk)(contribs) " +" It is not a term I am familiar with, even after working on hundreds of RAF station articles. It almost sounds like a phrase made up by someone not overly ofay with RAF terminology. Servicing flight maybe, Servicing Squadron or Servicing Wing are all familiar to me, but never echelon. Skip over it for the time being and look at that aspect later would be my advice (or ask MilborneOne who is very knowledgable). GREENSTUFF " +like i told you before, agf is not everlasting, if somebody consistently acts in a bad faith manner that assumption flies out the window. but back to the point, anything where you say 'it was a reasonable conclusion' is by definition OR. You are concluding something that is not in the source, which is what OR is. To your other 'points', you earlier said the hands and knees shot was not needed, why is it now, what made you change your mind? We dont cover the type of injuries for the 5000+ injured and 1300+ dead why should we here? And last, none of this paragraph was mine, you still dont understand that, I took this from somebody elses rewrite assuming it was consistent with the original. Last, the extra quote. What point does it server? What does it say that isnt already said? +I see no mention of the amount of money that was fleeced from the public. I remember it was in the millions, and I think it was in the tens of millions that they took in (as I recall, they employed a couple of hundred people in their boiler-room operation, in Florida I think it was). Also, as I vaguely recall, they spirited millions of dollars out of the United States into Carribbean bank(s) when they realised the net was closing in, but there is no mention of any of this in the article. Can somebody that knows this stuff put it in? Otherwise, it's pretty one-sided. I mean, if they fleeced tens of millions, then a sentence of 18 years seems about right. Thansk in advance. +" Taiwo Atieno II Just noticed your question on my talkpage — somehow I'd missed it. My understanding of the WP convention is that if a player is rostered with a club for any significant period of time, that club is listed in his infobox even if the player makes no appearances for the club. If a player only passes through briefly and makes no appearances for the club, however, it isn't listed. As for the other question, I'd say it's fairly common in the US for a player to spend a very brief period on the roster of one club before being traded to another: for instance, in the 2006 expansion draft, expansion franchise Toronto FC snapped up a couple of guys simply for their ""trade value"" and then proceeded to deal them to other teams in exchange for players they actually wanted. I believe that in circumstances like this, we wouldn't list a Toronto FC tenure in a player's infobox. Overall, my understanding of the guidelines here is pretty shakey, to be honest. ''' 《Defender of Open Editing》''' " +No thats not what I am suggesting. They are an illegal organisation not an illegal terrorist organisation. Under the Offences against the state act people are convicted of membership of an illegal organisation. +" At least my edit has the virtue of being accurate, instead of your description of Bondeson as a ""historian"" which was 100 percent inaccurate. Was that not ""original research?"" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nazi_talking_dogs&oldid;=431078201. When you complained to another editor that Bondeson should be described as a historian, the other editor seemed to be of the opinion that this gentleman is far from being qualified as a source on such matters (here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIridescent&action;=historysubmit&diff;=431204290&oldid;=431203015). " +Throw the Jew down the well! So my country can be free! +Wow, you certainly are a worthy archivist - thanks for the info! Are all the staff at Warwick as thorough as you? I'll be reading Englsih there next year! +This is my talk page, feel free to post a message ! +And here is the long discussion and poll which includes details about the effect of forced image sizing on the visually disabled, including this summary table: +I will be telling my father, Jimmy Wales, about this. He OWNS this place. YEAH! Didn't think you were messing with Lombardo Wales, did you?! +"Racebending gained traction as reliable source after Roger Ebert and several other sources used Racebending as a source of news, which would make it a reliable source by Wikipedia's standards. In addition, the writer himself, has been asked as ""Mike has been interviewed about media diversity by reliable of news organizations on the issue he's writing about, including the Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, BBC Radio, and Public Radio International"" says. I say it's a notable allegation especially the follow up comments with the Jim Sturgess comment in response to such allegations (in which he responded to the allegations of racism by being a jerk... but MO, which was screencapped.) I should also remind you that this is not a forum. So if the people agree with the assessment or not doesn't make it more or less valid. Personally, I would say that it would go into the critical reception section. And the Jim Sturgess comments should be mentioned as it is a reply. (A stupid reply, yes, but it is an official reply). http://www.racebending.com/v4/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/twitter_jimsturgess011.jpg " +Chillum FYI...chillum really does have breasts. They're not very nice. Cheers! 68.28.155.112 +I will ensure that your troubling behaviour and attitude is both reported and looked into. +" Andrew Nellis article Sorry, but you are abusing the condition of your admin status and the Andrew Nellis article has been recreated in accordance with conditions with Wikipedia rules. There was a 7-7 vote on the article being deleted and there was never any consenus to delete this article. There has been a proper deletion review post made on September 30th 2006. I have also contacted Wikipedia concerning this matter as I feel it is insulting for one admin to delete articles based soley on what he feels are ""real"" users on Wikipedia. The user asking for deletion claimed the article was a vanity page. In fact, there is ample evidence from the early history of the Andrew Nellis page that it was created by the same people who eventually asked for its deletion. At first the article made light of Nellis' weight, health problems and political ambitions. This was changed and so-called vanity portions of the article were removed. When the article took the shape of an actual Wikipedia article, the users on Dalnet IRC, primarily those from the #Atheism and #memes channels called for its deletion as it no longer mocked Nellis' weight and other health problems. I am going to recreate this article as long as there is no consensus and as long as wikipedia admins wrongfully delete the article. " +" Hello. I'm aware of that but I don't want to edit posts and get blocked again hence I'd like an advisor/mentor to guide me on here first so once I post it I wouldn't have any trouble. For example """". I wish to edit the page ""Muslim conquest of Persia"" and add these sections to them as they are historical facts. Mass massacre and conversion According to available documents such as the Shahnameh (Book of Kings) by Ferdowsi (Persian Poet) who took on the great role on preserving the Persian language from being lost; by the order of the Arab commander “Yazid ibn al-Muhallab” in north of Persia, Gorgan, many Persians were beheaded so that their blood, mixed with water would energize the millstone to produce as much as one day's meal for him. As Yazid ibn al-Muhallab had vowed and ordered his soldiers to cut off the tongue of anyone who dared to speak Persian. This is why in Arabic, Persians are called “Ajam”, meaning mute. The event of blood mill has been quoted by the generations of historians and Persian (Iranian) ""Zoroastrian"" families to this day. In recent years however, disenchanted Iranian scholars have been writing about the blood mills and this event has been reported by Iranian historians of the Islamic era. On the way to Mazandaran Province (Northern Iran), Yazid ibn al-Muhallab also ordered 12,000 Persian captives to be hanged at the two sides of the road so that the victorious Arab army could pass through. Upon arrival, many more were massacred in that province and heavy tax (Jizya) was imposed on the survivors who did not convert to Islam. Some historians have estimated that a total of 400,000 Persian (Iranian) civilians were massacred. After the battle of Ali, the Arab commander (Khalid ibn al-Walid) ordered all the prisoners of war be decapitated so that a creek of blood flows. When the city of “Estakhr” in the south of Iran put up a stiff resistance against the Arab invaders, 50,000 residents were slaughtered. One of the battles by the Arabs has been named, “Jelovla” (Covered), because an estimated 100,000 bodies of the slain Persian soldiers covered the desert. It is reported that 130,000 Persian women and children were enslaved and sold in the Mecca and Medina markets and large amounts of gold and silver were plundered. One respected Iranian scholar recently wrote, “Why so many had to die or suffer? Because one side was determined to impose his religion upon the other who could not understand”. The Arabs colonized, exploited, raped and despised the Persians (Iranians). They even named the Persian converts “Mawali” or “Liberated Slaves”. Persian rebellion Babak Khorramdin was one of the main Iranian (Persian) iconic rebels against the Arab invasion. He alongside his wife (Banu Khorramdin) fought against the Arabs for an estimated time of 23 years and won every battle. Records show that Babak and his army of Khurramites killed over 500,000 invading Arabs. Caliph Umar, who was behind the conquest of Persia was assassinated in November 644 by a Persian who had been enslaved Pirouz Nahavandi. Piruz was also behind the murder of Ali, however knowledge of Piruz's death is unclear. Hormuzan is said to have masterminded this plot. Caliph Uthman ibn Affan (644–656) succeeded Umar. During his reign almost the whole of the former Sassanid empire's territory rebelled from time to time until 651, until the last Sassanid emperor Yazdegerd III was assassinated near Merv ending the Sassanid dynasty and Persian (Iranian) resistance to the Muslims. The main rebellion was in the Persian provinces of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Fars Province (Pars), Sistan in 649, Tabaristan, Khorasan (651), and Makran (650). Please share me your thoughts. " +3RR You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Naked short selling. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. +I addressed and acted upon their opposes. They will never acknowledge that. That's why the proposal is a bad idea. You're asking me to do something that I have already done. Repeatedly. ( ) +" History of West Australia You asked me to let you know when I put it up. Cheers. —Moondyne Talk? ]] Out there It was raining in Dubbo and the sky looks bloody heavy at lennox head have a happy whatever folks - cheers Suro Dear Satusuro. The signs portend of a safe and prosperous year ahead! Regardening, insignis Greetings The joys of holidaying -) Well it is another hot and dry one here today and 40+ tomorrow. I am back to work today, so at least it is air-conditioned. With Australian towns, I have made a resolution of sorts to be a little more ruthless with removing uncited information from articles, especially where it is of uncertain provenance and minimal notability. I'll have to see what reaction this gets but I feel it necessary; some of the town articles, especially in NSW and QLD are loaded with unencyclopedic trivia. Cheers, \talk Happy New Year! Dear friend, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Eve, and that 2008 is your best year yet! ~ Riana ⁂ Happy New Year {| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" style=""border:2px ridge silver; -moz-border-radius:10px; background-color:lemonchiffon; font-size:10pt"" |align=""center""| | Hello SatuSuro, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ...and further nationalist conquests ;) All the best!.... ~ ''' (bananabucket) |align=""center""| |} Hey cheers Satu - I see that you have been (broadly speaking) visiting my neck of the woods. And indeed I have been visiting Tas. Nice to hear from you. Happy New Year to you too my friend. talk PS have added a few new pics to the Tassie project pages. Hope you like? talk Happy New Year Does it contravene the MOS To have the same heading 3 times? Anyway, have a good one and remember to keep your camels away from the Gastros on your expeditions happy Mango season 'TIS MANGO SEASON.... Have a shlice of mango cheek...well, I am up to my armpits in the things. Yuletide means lots and lots of mangos, as well as turkey and ham and ice-cream and pressies. Were on special so I bought 3 crates for AU$20 and now I have both crispers in the refrigerator full and even with everyone eating two of the ##$@& things every mealtime... I am a bit mangoed out so I thought I'd spread the goodwill around....cheers,  (talk · contribs) have fun up there...cheers,  (talk ·''' contribs) == WikiProjec +, 24 June 2007 (UTC) BTW, I did read the article. I read it carefully to see if the article said that his telling the crowd to shut up indicated seriousness. It didn't. - T 20:12 +"==Copyright problems== Hello. Concerning your contribution, Texteded, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Texteded appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Texteded has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Texteded and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Texteded with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Texteded. However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. " +" Thank you (talk) Please {{re}} " +If you leave me a message here, I will ignore it and delete it. I do not care what you have to say. +" I was given a pin code this morning. How many of you plan to go? — 2 " +" File:Nonna quadro.jpg missing description details Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Nonna quadro.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. " +Akamatsu's Opinion So, what is Ken Akamatsu's opinion regarding the creation of a new story based on his theme, setting, and characters? +REDIRECT Talk:San Jose Earthquakes Stadium +It's a good article, Mike. A good article with sad news. And how have you been doing lately? +Generals stuff I think it should be moved to the Generals article. +. I believe users are objecting to the B&W; image for the same reason you seem to prefer it: it's not as clear a depiction. I'd personally prefer a better image, altogether, but for the time being the color version seems to convey more information to the reader +I don't think that stuff was all done, unless it got un-done along the way. +Why should anything be said without reliable sources? And if keeping the can of worms closed means having this article effectively read like an indictment of shariah from the view of a handful of orientalists, opening that can of worms might not be a bad idea. If implicit dhimmi is still part of Shariah, does that include prohibiting Jews from wearing sandals as the article claims? I can't help but feel the article is deliberately vague on the distinctions between historical practices and the core rules regarding nonMuslims according to Shariah. The article merely highlights the most oppressive of actions and presumes that all the Muslim World embraces those policies. +"==Notability of Valerie Atkinson Brown== A tag has been placed on Valerie Atkinson Brown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. talk " +Categorizing Differences I've recognized quite a lot of differences between the anime and manga, which I havn't even put down yet... so I think it would be best to have them categorized so it'll seem less sloppy. Any objections? +Oppose since the suggestion seems contrary to MOS:CT. — +Blue is as suitable as any colour. +Origin of 'wormwood' One basic starting point might be to explain why the original Greek apsinthion has been translated into English as 'Wormwood'. +P.S.: How do you reconcile being a supporter of a strict zero tolerance policy on vandalism with being an administrator making un-sourced edits, like the one I am complaining about here? +It looks like the widget got that derivation from the OED, which is listed in my compact edition and online as deriving from Cabiai. I've never heard of Galibi before; OED says it's spoken in French Guiana...almost surely worth mentioning, although I wonder if Galibi isn't the ultimate root. I'll keep looking into that. +Mikkalai, I'm glad you got that email. I only asked if you got it because I was not totally sure if I had sent it right. +HOW DARE THEY SIT UNDER THE WHITE MAN'S TREE. THEM FUCKIN NIGGERS HAVE TO LEARN THEIR PLACE! +This is also the kind of disruption the sockmaster is known for when requesting unblocks with his socks. The whole creepy 3rd person thing is new, but Echigo mole has always treated unblocks as art, so each persona is different. - 2¢ © Join WER +hey hey faggot, are you dead yet? or are you watching your mom getting raped by filthy pigs? which one is it? +" Well, in the definition of the term, ethnic Moldovans are not associated with Romania (I am not saying that the definition is right, just that we have to deal with it, especially on disambig pages). My main point about Sîrbu was that, since he is a Moldovan citizen, and Moldovan-Romanian through this, there is no reason to wonder whether he is also a Moldovan by ethnicity; the only exception would be if Sîrbu is also, according to his own definition, an ethnic Moldovan - but this would still wouldn't matter for the main topic. The real question is ""Are there any Moldovan ethnics who are Romanian citizens without being (or having been) Moldovan citizens?"". The answer, as of yet, is ""No"", as we can all agree. " +That is very unfair comment on your part. Creating a list and providing information all in one place about the workings of senior government jobs and how people move about in the Public Service is not disparaging. If they are so insecure that what they do is not legitimate then they should apply better practices and systems that are more legitimate. You wanting to hide information from the public about who the people are that run government in Ontario and their movement from one government organization to another like its some kind of secret only the mandarins can know is ver troubling. People thing of Canada as an honest country. You seem to think that it is not and the what our bureraucrats do should be hidden from public knowledge. You are pushinig POV and propaganda as well as censoring interesting and important information from Wiki because you obvioulsy feel it is disparging. Since you agree that what bureaucrats in Ontario and how they move about like bees from flower to flower collecting nectar from the public purse, you should be looking to help create a depository of information people can use to see how things work. Maybe we can clean up some of the bad things wwe hear about like the Adscam and GunScam and all of the other Scams plaguing Canada'c Civil Services at every level of goverment. Maybe its because they keep this kind of information so secret that they are able to get away with corrupt activities outside of public scrutiny. +that's not what WP:synth means. Read it again. This standard is not applied anywhere else on any other article. There is no requirement that every single source must mention the MRM. Also, your point is rather disingenuous, given this source was added when the article Was about men's rights. +Yes, I read it and I understand it now. That's why I ddn't repeat the word up there. It would not bother me if someone did that to me I believe in sticks and stones will break my bones but words can never hurt me. But now I know the rules and will not call people names, even when it is true. But I still believe that having him glote over getting me blocked IS childish and I meant what I said. But if he is an adminstrator and thinks it is ok to glote then he is probably going to always be a childdish person. He has a bigger problem than I do. It's kind of like the joke my teacher told us, when the ugly guy made fun of the fat guy for being fat and the fat guy said that he could diet and change but the ugly guy will always be ugly. What Flewis did when he lied and accused me of not leaving summarys and when he left that glote and all the other things shows that he is like the ugly guy. I feel sorry for him. +I intended the comment about multiplicity to be an exception to the first line about quadratic convergence. You are correct that this is less than clear. Your suggested phrasing is fine. Durand-Kerner is Newton's method simultaneously on a vector of root guesses, with the derivative of the polynomial approximated by the derivative of what the polynomial would be if its roots were the current set of guesses. This permits a lot of redundant computation to be eliminated, and the algorithm parallelized. If f(x) is a 4th degree polynomial and p,q,r,s are root approximations, the approximated polynomial is (x-p)(x-q)(x-r)(x-s) and its derivative at p is (p-q)(p-r)(p-s) so a Durand-Kerner iteration for p would be p = p - f(x)/((p-q)(p-r)(p-s)) and iterations of identical form for q, r, and s follow immediately. You are correct this looks a lot like the example given in the Jacoby's method article. +" ""Baiting"" Wasn't really baiting was it? Sure we can guess people's opinion, but that's not really guessing it is it? As a professional wrestling fan and a reader of Mr. Hitchens I'm interested to find out his views, I think I can guess as well but we may be surprised." +" middle finger _l_ well fuck you i fucking listed a source ffs " +"Oh, and, who or what is ""Sampolit"", is that you? " +" February 2006 (UTC) It didn't state everything spun off. It is reworded to clarify: ""Computer-science research has branched itself into many of their own disciplines or into disciplines that already exist."" — 18:55, 2" +Stop it! Stop it right now! Continuing you will only help the anti-romanian users. I will revert your work. +Wait a minute..... I have to read and then leave your box up FOREVER??? Is there a way you can make Tennis Expert leave me alone on my talk page? holy moly. +What if one just concentrated on getting the gist of Barry Cunliffe's publications into Wikipedia articles, with references. That one might do on one's own, without a gang. +I will blank out my entire user page. I should also say that your actions will have absolutely no effect on the users in question. Consensus has been reached by the majority of concerned editors, time and time again. But this has always been ignored. As soon as the protection expires, it will be business as usual on this and other articles. +" Revert war Stop revert warring please. I've blocked a group of IP addresses for 3RR violation. adiant_>|< 11:30, August 26, 2005 (UTC)" +Phoebe-SM Hi. I updated the evidence as per your comments on Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Phoebe-SM. Would you be able to take a look at it for me? Thanks. ~~ ][talk] +What me know what I'm talking about, just commiting a bit of original research and shouting history! Anyway I did a bit of digging in google which turned up Gregory St. Vincent (Grégoire de Saint-Vincent), with - The Greeks described a spiral using an angle and a radius vector, but it was St. Vincent and Cavalieri who simultaneously and independently introduced them as a separate coordinate system. In an article The Origin of polar coordinates, J. J. Coolidge refers to the priority dispute between Cavalieri and St. Vincent over their discovery. St. Vincent wrote about this new coordinate system in a letter to Grienberger in 1625 and published the process in 1647. On the other hand Cavalieri's publication appeared in 1635 and the corrected version in 1653. and Milestones in the History of Thematic Cartography Development of the use of polar coordinates for the representation of functions. Newton's Method of Fluxions was written about 1671, but not published until 1736. Jacob Bernoulli published a derivation of the idea in 1691. [238,p. 324] attributes the development of polar coordinates to Fontana, with no date.- Isaac Newton (1643-1727), England, and Gregorio Fontana (1735-1803) and Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705) [238,p. 324]. 1671 is probably too early; 17361755 would probably be more appropriate. There are earlier references to Hipparchus (190-120BC) regarding the use of polar coordinates in establishing stellar positions, and Abu Arrayhan Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Biruni (1021) regarding the use of three rectangular coordinates to establish a point in space. 1843 Use of polar coordinates in a graph(frequency of wind directions)- Léon Lalanne (1811-1892), France [148]. La Habra High School Math History Timeline Jacob Bernoulli invents polar coordinates, a method of describing the location of points in space using angles and distances. Sherlock Holmes in Babylon and Other Tales of Mathematical History has a section Newton as an originator of polar coordinates Jacob Amsler http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Printonly/Amsler.html [Amsler] invented the polar planimeter, a device for measuring areas enclosed by plane curves. It was based on polar coordinates whereas earlier instruments were based on cartesian coordinates. In 1856 Amsler published a paper Über das Planimeter in which he gave details of his idea. As Mahoney writes in [1], Amsler's planimeter:- ... adapted easily to the determination of static and inertial moments and to the coefficients of Fourier series: it proved especially useful to shipbuilders and railway engineers. So it seems there is considerable different accounts of their introduction, and quite a few notable applications. +Ankaram You should post this to the admin noticeboard, and offer it to a wider wikipedia audience. As for checkuser, it's not so much that they refuse requests from people not in the clique, but these requests are generally only used when rules have been violated. I don't think any purported sock of Ankaram has been subject to admin action yet. So I suggest you bring this to the wider community and maybe some things will come of that. Having a sockpuppet is not disallowed, so checkuser is rarely used. +" Deleting my talk page -plethora of emails and dewatch Perhaps you could give me pointers on how to save diffs where someone will not delete them. That editor has posted several personal attacks on me, just recently a series of diffs from a year ago. How does an editor manage to save those in secret, but available at the drop of a hat? I think my problem is that I refuse to use emails. I think that is how all this negativity is compiled with people ganging up in cabals. You are not one of them, as far as I know, but now I will have to worry. — (Talk) " +I believe that the troops that are staying are helping to train the Iraqi army and police, as well as Iraqi intelligence. At the very least, that's the impression I've gathered from this. '''''' +21:44, 25 March 2011 +"Kekeke zerg rush == I firmly believe that the proper usage is ""kekeke zerg rush ^____________________^"" Please replace ""Zerg Rush Kekeke!"" with ""kekeke zerg rush!"" 24.184.188.175 Please provide some references that show you're correct. ""I firmly believe"" is not acceptable, sorry! The New Hacker's Dictionary says that hackers actually use perfectionist language and " +" Okay I'm done talking about policy! I just thought I'd let you know that no one believes Wikipedia info to back up REAL sources. We aren't even allowed to use Wikipedia as a source on our Source Cards for research papers! Maybe you should find a new hobby and forget about wikipedia because I just created this account to make this place a bit more accurate! The internet is screwy noawadays and the only place I really trust is StarKidz because they get donations from parents etc...NO ONE EVEN TRUSTS WIKIPEDIA SO MAYBE YOU SHOULD STOP WASTING YOUR TIME! I'm never coming back here again. I previous had an account which you blocked for ""copyright infringment"" when I wasn't posting anything you weren't. I honestly created this account to badmouth wikipedia so...YOU'RE AN ASS! " +and you're gay too, faggot +Do you think people would like you more if you weren't such a dick? Or are you a dick because no one likes you? Either way, you won't be missed. +Oppose merge I think the party is better covered independently. Aspects other than Weston have been covered substantially in the media. Including that material in the article on Weston would be inappropriate. Examples include coverage of the other party candidates and coverage of the Liberty GB radio host who was arrested for his criticisms of a controversial muslim monitoring group (I can't think of the name of the group at the moment, mama something?). +Oy vey Would you consider the redirect I suggested (after you edited) on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oy vey | Talk +Notable Jadoons== Iqbal Khan Jadoon. (13th Chief Minister of NWFP) Amanullah Khan Jadoon. (Minister of Petroleum and Gas) Colonel Ghulam Mustafa Khan Jadoon,Ex District Nazim of Abbottabad Khan Gohar Rehman Khan Jadoon, Father of Iqbal Khan and Amanullah Khan Jadoon. Fareed Mohammed Khan Jadoon, Ex MNA from Abbottabad Khan Sahib Mohammed Akram Khan Jadoon,Nawnashehr, First Deputy Commisioner from Hazara before 1947 Dr Azhar Khan Jadoon ( Founder of Hira Hospital, Women medical college Nawansher, Women Institute of Technology, A political personality) Shamroz Khan Jadoon. Former minister of NWFP Ali Afzal Khan Former MPA Dr Shahnawaz Khan Jadoon Dr. Akif Zeb Khan Jadoon Shohali(PhD Chemistry Germany) Zaffar Iqbal Khan Jadoon industrialist businessman,Canada Inayatullah Khan Jadoon,son of Iqbal Khan, Businessman & Politician Mohammed Ali Khan Jadoon, IG Police,Retired 1976, Nawanshehr,Abbottabad. Mohammed Kamal Khan Jadoon,Advocate ,Nawanshehr,Abbottabad. Wing Commander Aslam Khan Jadoon of Bagra,Havellian. Mohammed Yaqub Khan Jadoon,Ex-MNA from Gandaff. Ajoon Khan Jadoon,Ex-MPA from Gandaf Ghafoor Khan Jadoon,Ex-MPA from Gandaf Dr.Wamiq Jadoon, Paediatrician,USA. Dr.Changez Jadoon,interventional Radiologist,UK Dr.Asad Jadoon,Cardiologist, USA Dr.Naila Jadoon,Gynecologist,UK Dr.Suraiya Yasmeen,Gynecologist,Abbottabad Dr.Saleem Jadoon, Anaesthetist,Abbottabad Dr.Colonel Farooq Khan, Opthalmologist,Abbottabad. Dr. Irum Jadoon,Medical Specialist,USA Dr.Taimur Jadoon,Gynecologist,UK. Bigadier Gul Khan Jadoon,Abbottabad Brigadier Afsar Khan,Abbottabad Major General Masood Khan, Abbottabad Dr. Ehsan Jadoon,Psychiatrist,Australia Air Commodore Afsar Khan Jadoon,Abbottabad Engineer Farooq Khan of Nawanshehr,Director General Qadeer Khan Research laboratories, Dr. Habib Jadoon,Medical Physician ,pakistan. Brigadier Benaras Khan Of Sheikhul Bandi, Abbottabad Taimoor Khan Jadoon, Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator, Pakistan == +" We just call him Boris. LOL. He's a more civil curmudgeon than I am. Talk• Contributions " +, along with the fact that it was waged against nations who had already declared war on us. +I reverted the page to the last stable form. I thought there was a discussion on which location to use, but now I can't find it. +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you are recieving this warning and you didn't vandalize, you may want to consider creating an account. There are many benefits. PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae " +" Do four merges - ugh Talk:Gynephilia_and_androphilia#Multi_Merge_discussion. Banjeboi" +Please feel free to make this kind of change. But also please be informative about where the link points. (For example, if it's a PDF file, say it's a PDF file; and if it's very big, say so.) +std can this be considered an STD? +XM-8 and XM-25 I believe that this page deserves the information that the XM29 is to have both componets designed into their own weapons the XM-8 Rifle (the rifle component) and the XM-25 Grenade launcher (although its grenades have been upped to 25mm from 20mm). Division of program resulting for action in 2004. +" But, in general, there is also some ambiguity between tensors and pseudotensors (or between even and odd) when it comes to integrands. An example in one dimension, when and is: The first integral is equal to either of the other two integrals. In the second integral the integrand transforms like a tensor (or odd tensor) density, but the integration limits are no longer from lower to higher; in a higher-dimensional example they would be no longer right-handed. In the second integral the integrand transforms like a pseudotensor (or even tensor) density because we have kept the integration limits in proper order, −b < −a; in higher dimensions we would say that we are maintaining right-handedness. The usual convention I've seen is to keep the coordinates right-handed and to transform the integrand as a pseudotensor density, but the other approach is equally valid. — (talk | contribs) " +" Bastion FAC I've addressed all of your points raised at the FAC, if you want to return to it/the article. Thanks for reviewing! N " +" Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ''TalkStalk''(P) " +" Thank u !! You too ?! How r u ? I Still can`t say whether i would take it again or not .. regards, ★ ." +Was that fast enough? +TIPTOETY’S ANUS IS STRETCHED BY GRAWP’S MASSIVE COCK +I am now going to report you for repeated vexatious removal of relevant facts from this article, which amounts to vandalism. Have a nice day. +" Notability If you used a different word, maybe you would make yourself more clear. Notability, as per the wikipedia policy, is completely and utterly about articles, and in no way applies once an article is deemed notable. It has nothing to do with the contents of an article, or whether this or that should be added or removed. It says so right on the page. ""These notability guidelines only outline how suitable a topic is for its own article. They do not directly limit the content of articles"" " +Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Klsdjfhsdlkjfhsdjklfh) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it's confusing and it doesn't make sense. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. +Lysy, I did not accuse you in anything. I simply pointed out to the existence of the trend with Catherine, Suvorov, Russo-Japanese war and even Tyutchev, Pushkin and Ded Moroz articles getting an excessive polonocentric view. I disagreed with that particular edit to the RA article because it is within that pattern, set not by you. The reason why that illustration was not optimal, is explained in detail at Talk:Russian architecture#Stalin's palace in Warsaw. Your attempt to illustrate the article was appreciated. The image later was replaced with the image that illustrated the article better and there is no need for more than one illustration of this particular issue in such a broad article, especially since we have several narrower ones. +" ""Lies"" Insted of saying that my work is lies. Take one point and prove it wrong with a source. There you go. " +Yea well Sorry but BOOKS that aren't even in print are not notable. I can't but see you guys must be infatuated with this lady to wqant to redo her wiki with total BS. Jimbo put the ONLY verifiable informatrion on the page, his comment ment, if you put something it BETTER be verifiable. Sorry but Books that are not even in print are NOT notable. She was in playboy, that is notable. Her sitting at home using the username GODDESSY on wiki is NOT notable, neither are her eBooks she has written. +" ""Anal raping of donkeys""?? It must be a joke, mustn't it?" +There hast got to be a fair use pic of bermuda somewhere. WikiProject class rating This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. +or 2H2O(aq) → 2H2(g) + O2(g) +" Spare me Java. After this comment by you on my talk in July, I cautioned you against mocking and misrepresenting people's religions, or jumping to conclusions based on your misconceptions of their beliefs. If what you wrote at the Template talk:Palestinian ethnicity was innocently satirical, I find it very hard to believe. Please stop with the bad-mouthing. It creates a bad atmosphere. " +No, you clearly don't know what you are talking about. See this is what happens when you all decide to comment about me instead of addressing the points I raise, whenever I ask the hard question or raise the hard facts, you all go running. It's impossible to reach a concensous when I have to deal with users who are unwilling to answer. +" Temazepam article He is starting the fight back up on the temazepam talk page. I can only hold my temper for so long as I see my reputation and character as an established editor further hammered into the ground by this person. Just letting you know. We were meant to be ""cooling it"" as requested but he won't let it go. " +I've corrected the nesting. McGovern did run in 1984 and Trotta did cover it - I've added a reference for this. — (Talk • Contribs) +Ok, I'll open the debate in the talk-page. Would you be so kind to copy/paste your answer there? cheers. (Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!) +" I was not trolling; I was trying to present the facts. The fact the he wanted to permanently ban me because I didn't share his POV...well make up your own mind. Regardless, Xtra started all this by smugly questioning why I didn't get into Melbourne Law. ::I don't have $21,000 to buy my way in like ""other"" people. Sterling was incorrect when S/he wrote: ""The ALP is neo-liberal, balanced budgets, selling off state interests, free trade and lower regulation."" This is supposed to be: The Liberal Party is neo-liberal, balanced budgets, selling off state interests, free trade and lower regulation."" That's why my HECS have an 8 year quota and were increased by 25%. Regardless, even if I were 100% correct, given who Xtra's ""friends"" are I wouldn't stand a chance. - 01:26, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)" +" Yes, I have. But still I insist on only neutral sources. I want to see a source other from those coming from RoM or Bulgaria or Greece that speaks about a Macedonian language in Pirin that is different from the Bulgarian dialect spoken there - the Bulgarian dialect that is part of the Bulgarian language continuum. Borders do divide after all and self-identification counts - Less than 1% of the people in Blagoevgrad province have described their language as Macedonian. It would help if you change the map to dialects spoken by the whatever minority lives there (slav, ethnic Macedonian, Slavomacedonian or whatever). T " +Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the Poop page on Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. —TALKCONTRIBSEMAIL +" Image:Peter macnicol.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Peter macnicol.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +You are forgetting, I did NOT initiate this discussion. The people who did have a right to expect it not be deleted without resolution. Their concerns are different from my own and have yet to be addressed. +The article on Morphological analysis needs an overhaul The article on Morphological analysis started out as a relatively simple reference to Zwicky’s ideas, a definition of the process, a few references and some external links. I did not initiate this, but whoever did referred to me and the Swedish Morphological Society. This was fine with me: I went in and added a few details which I though relevant to the subject, but more or less left things as they were. Then, a Mr. I. Tjahyo Sarwono came along with some very complicated diagrams, rather poor English, misinterpretations and explicit errors (a parameter he mistakenly calls a value, and a value he calls a parameter). I am in despair over this, as I don’t want morphological analysis to get a bad name because of a sloppy Wikipedia article. I would like to go in and give the article a major overhaul – but I don’t know what the policy is about throwing out other contributors’ texts and diagrams. Can you give me some council on this? Tom Ritchey The Swedish Morphological Society. (ritchey@swemorph.com] +I agree that we should not do a redirect. I have been fixing the pages that link to this dab page and can verify the point that at least as many wikilinks are looking for something other than the film series. +" I've outlined all of my edits and sources on the talk page. Let's discuss and come to an agreement. Best, — • Talk • " +Plot Shouldn't the Plot section include both endings? +Wikileaks shut down & rebooting in Switzerland Please discuss this material and allow time for the full story to develop before adding it to the article: Transcript of Democracy Now! story and debate between Glenn Greenwald and Steven Aftergood +" The Heatblast is not from the original Omnitrix. He is Alan, the Plumber kid that Ben met in ""Everybody Talks About The Weather"". Geez, do you even WATCH the show? Bakutrix 9 November 2008" +Community Charge Hey, just wanted to let you know that an editor has reverted your move of Community Charge, in case you wanted to consider an WP:RM. (let's chat) +" Internal Troops Hi there! Thanks for volunteering to help! Actually, you can help on Internal Troops (and some other pages I hope) without your knowledge of local languages. What I have in mind is something theoretical ). You see, we lack a definition, a term, a classification there. I mean the subject (the troops) is described pretty well for now. But WHAT are those troops in military/legal terms: a gendarmerie? A military police (which I doubt)? A special kind of civil police? What about some ""motorized rifle"" (a term mentioned deep in the article by one of the authors)? So why don't we develop this issue? If you're OK with that, let's put our findings on the article's talkpage. Cheers, " +afrocentrism hey there, could you please explain your edits to afrocentrism? once will be enough. for now its hard to see if you're just pushing someones buttons or really think the reversions are correct (or both). thanks a lot. +Vandalism Al Pacino was NOT involved in the Scarface video game. I am removing that part of the article. +Aye, share the load. I link to a lot of LotR crap... I'm such a geek. Yeah, I'll get myself into bed - just want to leave a message on Drunkenness to see if they'll let me move the Quotations section to Wikiquote. Have a good night, I'll be outta here in 10, as well. _dzasta +You Hey bro why do you love Grace Saunder so much? +"::::::Noren, your argument is ridiculous. Only a very few atoms (helium, neon, and argon) have TRULY filled electron shells, and can participate in energy-releasing fusion. The reference is making generic statements, so that it specifies ""light nuclei"" instead of particular elements. It does not need to say HOW filled an electron shell is, when making generic remarks about light nuclei. It DOES specifically state, ""In normal conditions between atoms or molecules, the nuclei never get close enough for fusion to commence"". And all of us here know that the conditions of CF are far more normal than stellar. Regarding the other stuff in my last post, I do know that it is OR and was not trying to get it into the article at this time (it won't be OR forever). I just wanted to point out to Art, who brags about his Phd, that he's the one who is dead wrong about electron shells being in the way. I recall reading about the shells being in the way about 4 decades ago, when I first started learning stuff about fusion. It was the very first thing that came to my mind, as a problem to solve, when I first heard about cold fusion. It is silly to not mention this problem in the article here. IS there a conspiracy by CF-detractors, to keep any data out of the article that might someday become related used to the solutions to the main problems? Why else would Art do his latest lie-of-omission, trying to talk about real nuclei under real-world conditions without paying any attention to the electrons that were associated with those nuclei? The SUN does not fly apart, all its temperature-freed nuclei receding to infinite distance under the influence of mutual electric repulsion (which would indeed happen if there were no electrons in the mix). He even wants us to believe that while we can mathematically add 2+2 to get 4 in a Wikipedia article, we can't do simple obvious logic that is mathematically equivalent. If a source article says, ""termites caused the collapse of this house"", Wikipedia can't be precisely accurate and say, ""gravity caused the collapse of that house, after termites weakened its structure""?? " +People died so this starlet's philanthropy would exhaust itself when it came to the actual victims of torture, death, and murder... How utterly revolting...enjoy wikipedia...propaganda and whitewash in a whole new dimension... +Hey Alansohn, Why did you consider my comments on Fairfax county vandalism? it is all true. +Ok, fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to explain! I'll see if I can find someone to make one and release it into the public domain. +you shoudln't be giving advice on nonchallance when you delete the facts a person adds to the article in a move more akin to vandalism than to anything else, and where's the reply to the beef of my arguments? +Does anyone know where the 6 for €8 fosters is gone? havnt seen that feckin pack lately +It doesn't matter whether it's relevant or not. It's information; thus, it is appropriate for inclusion. +" This is the last I will say of this, but Rehab passed because your close personal friends, who also massively edited the article during the FAC, supported it. Therefore, if your friends are going to help you and (wrongly, in my opinion) going to support it afterwards, then it is easy for it to pass, especially if you get an FA delegate who doesn't care about such things. That was the main reason why I had a problem with Rehab passing, but I don't think I have ever given you a straight up answer. Now I have, and we have got things clear, I will forget about it so that World War 3 doesn't start! And I will make S&M; an FA. • Watch n' Learn " +Ah yes, the Lex Luthor-esque headquarters. I think, per Template:PD-Italy, if you can show original publication in Italy from 1975 or before (20 years before the URAA) this would certainly be PD. If the original publication was elsewhere it's a bit dicier. — +" Dual Survival (season 4) I noticed you my reverted edit again on that article. I thought I would show you the WP:PROVEIT. I don't care we wait until the date of the show actually airing to link on the next season page. But I thought I would let you know the first episode of season five titled ""Into The Canyons"" and is scheduled to air on January 21, 2015. " +oh yeahh and im mentally retarded and i sukk butt +" By the Way If possible, could you aid me in adding some general information to By the Way, such as Release info and other background knowledge? Thanks, (Talk) I have an exam tomorrow but I'll try to look at it in the evening or over the weekend ) Thanks a lot. Cheers! TC u2 wikiproject thanks for letting me use the template. i am only new to this so i need to ""borrow"" peoples stuff. i know everything is free but i will give u credit if you want. and even if u cant stand u2, i will always be a rhcp fan! " +I'm not trying to bully you or anything. I'm a nice guy. People are always picking on me but I really am a nice guy. And if you say any different I will $%(@ing ban your ass. +8 July 2005 22:39 (UTC) +":As noted in the article, it's an IBA Official Cocktail, and the IBA calls it an ""OLD FASHIONED"". That may not help with the capitalization question, but it does say something about the dash. Also please note that the WP:DASH style guide says that a dash is used to create a compound modifier (a compound adjective or compound adverb), but not a compound noun. Here I believe ""Old Fashioned"" is a noun. As for the capitalization, I think that ""Old fashioned"" appears too much like an adjective rather than a proper name. This page is about a specific named drink, so I think the capitalization is appropriate. — " +" and again: ""...brief history of Tesla starting at its founding not by Elon Musk, but Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning""." +Re Sorry, and you are? +Michael Eisner return Touchstore Pictures and Aardman Feature Animation to produced instead King of the Elves which Walt Disney Feature Animation was originally to produced but when Michael Eisner return Touchstore Pictures and Aardman Feature Animation to produced instead. +You guys suck stop faking it. +You are calamitous administrator! +Don't touch my edits, mothafucka. You're just angry cos ur poem sucks. +I think there is a serious problem. You cannot publish this article, Mishari bin Saud, since it has been under review. The other thing is that please try to be original. I will apply for related desks for this event, FYI. +Cruel justice like you attack others who are innocent and those you killed with pleasure you ox! -Boxingwear, where truth is 100%! +" Would you just do me a favor though and stop harassing me! I have reported you, and there will be something coming to you soon. I don't care that you have the ""Stupid Original Barnstar"", but that doesn't mean that you can harass me." +March 2012 (UTC) It is now confirmed that sitush is intentionally behind Meenas article..he is continuously hiding the well known Truth and distorting the article since 1 month. if varna is complex ha..then why did he failed in rajput article to hide varna???? because other editors there are not allowing him to edit there. We are here to represent the correct facts and truth and not the half hided distorted history. the article was best in december last year but he is continuously behind this article I dnt know what his actual interest in distorting this article. 11:37, 17 +Could you please stop creating these problems? Indeed, Keith Briffa is notable largely because of his role in the ClimateGate and related events that are important for the big picture of the climate science. This is just a fact. That's why it's absolutely unacceptable for you to try to vandalize our article again. You will do it again and I will try to look for methods how your account may be removed from Wikipedia because you're not adding anything positive to this constructive collective enterprise. +Qualifications to be President of the United States The U.S. Constitution, as it stands now, does not allow a woman to be president of the United States. The reason being Sections 1, 2 and 3 of Article II make it very clear by the use (twenty times) of the masculine pronouns, “he” and “his” that the drafters intended that only a man could be president. The drafters intent is further evidenced by the fact that they did not give women the right to vote plus who among them would have thought that a woman could be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States? +Edited per this editors assumed acceptance that anyone may freely edit other's comments. 86.178.177.160 +Yeah 9 11 was carried out by 19 cave dwelling Muslims who are openly funded by CIA. Even the Jundallaah terrorist leader admitted it. Wikipedia is for fact suppressing fagots like yourself. +Yup, I got that code from someone else myself. Cheers. +The problem was some idiot made ridiculous edits to the infobox. I'll try to fix it. +" ""Some scholars have argued in favor of more nuanced instructions—for instance, allowing an incident to be defined as discrimination even if the people involved didn’t realize they were discriminating, or allowing that discrimination might have affected an H.R. decision even if other non-discriminatory factors also played a role."" " +icarly Hey can you revert this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ICarly&diff;=325306840&oldid;=325305611 and add this refference to ths http://twitter.com/DanWarp/status/5454382586 thanks +My real advice is don't be a dick. I have nothing further to say to you or your baseless threats and rantings. You are out of line and have been for ages. I am NOT going to go google something to substantiate a claim that you made! I am sick of the way you have been treating me, talking to down to me and insulting me. Pathetic. If you can handle substantiating claims, then don't make them. You have been attacking me through out and turned this talk page into a crusade against me rather than focus on the topic. You clearly have psychological issues. You have proved nada, only substantiated my claims. And I firmly stand by them. I have raised valid concerns. You have nothing but evaded, attacked, been incivil and then go around calling people dicks. Feel free to take it anywhere. You are in the wrong and clearly you don't understand how to talk to people. +Disagree: It is NOT the same event, and there's no reason to integrate them. +" Biased? I am curious as to why it would seem that the U.S was singled out for a complete page on national racism? - I have yet to find a page dedicated to racism in other countries such as Africa, Britain, Mexico, Brazil, Iran, etc etc. Why is it that a whole page is dedicated to racism in the U.S as if it is/was the only country to marginalize persons by race? I believe that this page should be merged into a general page of world racism, or just be deleted altogether, it's a little more than ""biased"" in my opinion. See Racism by country. We deal with the ""bias"" of missing articles on Wikipedia by writing new articles. See WP:CSB if you want to help provide a more global view. By the way, people who say Africa is a country might raise a few hackles among other editors writing about racism. The situation in the United States is unique in terms of its special brand of racism, the completeness of the...the campaign against Native Americans, the special circumstances surrounding the trans-Atlantic slave trade, the particularities of this version of slavery, the premises and outcome of the Civil War, and especially the complex time period following emancipation. This period is fairly unique in many ways, including but not limited to the fact that a bifurcated society developed with the former slave class developing in parallel alongside the former slave-owning class with visible distinctions in terms of melanin and linguistic distinctions resulting from the circumstances of the previous centuries, the long process of segregation, Jim Crow, the rise of African-American influence on mainstream American culture, KKK, White Citizens Councils and lynchings, and the long drive for the abolition of Jim Crow and the securing of the right to vote not only on paper but in practice, and the fact that many of the goals have been achieved, though how thorough this achievement has been is still a topic of debate. Most historical precedents result in one race wiping out the other, either by killing or displacement. To merge this article would be like merging an article on the Second world War into a general article on War, or merging the article on Homo Sapiens into an article on mammals. It makes no sense. The truth hurts, but it's still the truth. This is a website for facts. I see where you hesitated with the ellipsis. The American campaign against the Natives involved such things as biological warfare, enslavement, mass rape, forced migration, and ordinary massacres. It was nothing less then genocide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.132.84.67 " +my hude tornado Me just a 11 year old there is a tornado from Webb city to neosho and I'm in seneca by dq yum but its not time to talk about food I'm like toatally scared could someone calm me down I'm afraid tht a tornado is gonna pick me and when it puts - throws me down I'm going to stop breathing please calm me down +I added the History section, because there was none. I'm not sure if that's an (rv), but I felt that it helps fill out the article more. +'' This is the most baller talk page ever. Everyone else wishes they could have as sweet of a talk page as this, all most bow down to this IP's talk page.'' +I know, but that intention does not excuse the nature of the offensive language.Caspian blue +He's a baldjo faggot. +" the intent/meaning of the book and film The supplmental material on the Blu-ray Disk includes reminiscences from Melvyn Douglas's granddaughter about the making of the film. It's obvious she has no idea whatever what the film is ""about"". The film's meaning is futher confused by Ashby's introduction of the ""walking on water"" scene, which is not in the book, and which he makes sure we ""get"" by having Chance thrust his umbrella into the lake. It's unfortunate that the film, like Chance, has become a kind of inkblot onto which people project their own interpretations, when it should be obvious to any reasonably intelligent person what Kosinsky is getting at. The book doesn't ""explain"" the story, either Kosinski had too much respect for the reader to do that but it goes something like this: Chance is a voyeur who has never actually experienced anything directly. Everything he knows is a vicarious experience from watching TV. And because his mind is filled with nothing other than what he sees on TV, he has never developed an ""inner dialog"" that might provide some framework into which he could place his ""experiences""." +Hello mate Hello David. I have decided to return in a somewhat more limited capacity. I just thought of you when I was perusing some old work of ours from the Central Park West Historic District. Anyway, I thought you might like to know. ) +" Or we could simply make it easy for the reader and include the information here... And before you start quoting Wiki-policies (not-game guide, etc), let's take a look at a random popular game I thought to look up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_Effect Examine the depth of detail it goes into. Substitute Force Powers for ""Tech Abilities"", and then compare those, weapons and character classes with what we've got on this article. A lot more detail and information than the six, give or take, available options I'm suggesting including. That article, may I point out, is rated B class. A notch above this one, so let's go by example, shall we? " +" I would (will) expand the into paragraph (sentence) at the top. — Wartenberg " +Declaration of war against vandalism on Maratha articles This war started at the article Jyotiba. I was very long time wating for anyone to creat this article , god Jyotiba is our clan god and i want to give complete information about god on wikipedia. Finaly this article was created and i was very happy but suddenly just in seconds this article was created this two guy , basterds started vandalising it by missuseing Wiki rules. It was very clear that their intention was very bad and first i warned them in good legal language. But they don't listen to me and went further and started vandalising other Maratha artiles. We can bear personal attatcs but not on our gods and prides anymore. So i request all Maratha brothers that they start to take strong action agains this peoples,entities. All we know that this southindian people are Bhangi, geneticaly infirior and basterds peoples of India . They have not participated the freedom struggle of India nor the deserve to call an Indian. They are pure bread Deshdrohis, decivers , cheaters of our nation and Hindu , Aryan religion. So we should , all Marathas gathered and fight against them +" Here's my five cents: I do not think it is practical to give coords for a middle point of Routes. I have looked around a bit and the only place I happened to find such coords is in Bundesautobahn 2. In this example there is an important junction in a city near the centre, so it makes sense, but in some Routes like Route 10 which consist of 3 or more separate fragments, defining any ""central"" point on them is too arbitrary. Also some routes are important and wide for a part of their length only, so their ""middle"" is not anything to go by. I would be happy with 2 points, but I know this is not practical in searching. I think an important destination (city or big town) somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3 of their length should be picked. But cases like Route 10 need more coords, maybe inline. Talk " +Move to Illinois I was under the impression Thomas Lincoln relocated to Illinois at the behest of his first wife's relation, John Hanks, not his stepson, John Johnston (cf. Donald, 36). Unless someone has different information, I'll change the entry next week. +commerce clause not needed the discussion of the commerce clause is important in the discusion of US federalism but it is not related to the tenth amendment. it should be moved somwhere else or at least shortened considerably +Why are you doing this? Are you some sort of sadist or troll? +"Bold textBLOCK ME DO IT> I WILL DOWNLOAD TOR AND HIDE MY IP ADDRESS AND WRECK HAVOC ALL OVER WIKIPEDIA. YOU BETTER SEND A MESSAGE SAYING IM BLOCKED FOR LIFE OR ILL DOWNLOAD TOR OFF OF A CONVENIENT WIKIPEDIA LINK USED TO HELP CHINESE COMMIES. WHAT SAY YOU! i dont want to speak to admiral yamomoto i want to ""cant sleep clown will eat me"" to respond. perhaps yamomoto should go kill people in nanking or the phillipines. TOR time is coming soon. what say you know clown will eat me......simpsons lover " +It's seeming less and less likely that CC were first. 72.66.80.133 +This user also dismisses all claims made by AniMate that he is Randy or is vandalizing. +You stupid fat bastard. Why did you censor the move logs of Pikachu, you fat oaf? Is it because it offended your delicate Victorian sensibilities? Are most British people as prudish as you? +List of countries by military expenditures I need your help getting the E.U. removed from List of countries by military expenditures since it is not a country. I see what and are trying to do, first they put the E.U. under supernational military organizations as a compromise in order to add some legitimacy for the E.U. being on that page and then after a few weeks they just flat out list it with actual countries and gettting their little E.U. buddies to gang up on all other users so you can keep the E.U. in. The E.U. is not a country and adding it to every single list that has to do with countries is a biased NPOV. Wikipedia is not a place for people from the E.U. to air their inferiority complexes by carefully editing article to make the E.U. seem like a country. Europeans also have a huge inferiority complex against Americans, as they slowely discover that: Americans brush their teeth more than once a year. American women shave, do not look like men, and have vertical teeth. The EU will never be recognized as a united sovereign state, and therefore it will never be able to compete with the US for superpower status. User:Daniel_Chiswick 17 April, 2007. +" The Raven - resource link Hi, can you please restore my links to how they were. I don't see that I'm breaking any rules, considering that both articles already feature links to products and companies (such as the short film adaptation of The Raven). Both of my links - that you have removed - are very much related examples to the subject of the two articles. They are not ads, but user submitted content to the article. Please restore them, or reason your actions - thank you. It's commercial linkspam-Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your product. Those sites that are linked to a product for sale are removed. Those sites that link to reviews and reliable sources are not. First of all, it's not ""my product"". Can you explain to me how ""Official site of the 2003 short film version by Trilobite Pictures"" constitutes as a reliable source? You can't just exclude everything that involves money. The Raven by vNovel Interactive happens to be a great resource for studying the poem. I happen to know this from first-hand experience, as a reader. I still don't agree with your censorship. Please clarify your point of view. (I've moved this conversation to your talk page, for your convenience.) " +Your a prick. keep your personal thoughts to your self. Jeff is the best driver ever and thats a fact. You musy be an idiot redneck. +Hi Bzuk. Unfortunately, you started an edit war with me, and some of my old enemies found an opportunity to ambush me. I really didn't think they would stoop so low as to get me blocked. I have been on Wikipedia for a long time and this has never happened to me. The thing is that my mother was a good friend of Cobber Kain's. To say his allegiance is the British Commonwealth or the United Kingdom is plain crazy. Most of the British personnel have United Kingdom, not British Commonwealth or some other country. I think this is just nationalism. I like to see consistency. +. I also delete the coolest wikipedia pages around because I am not cool at all. I live in my parents' basement +Whatever. I'll let you and argue that with other admins. +Taxobox modification Please do not make modifications to the taxobox templates without discussion and concensus on WP:TOL. - (talk) 06:00, August 29, 2005 (UTC) +"Welcome, ! I'm , and I noticed that you're new, so I thought I'd drop you a note. We do have a lot of users, and are currently working on articles, so things can be a little intimidating... but don't worry! We love to help out, and we'll try our best to make your stay here as comfortable as possible. Here are a few links I found useful when I first arrived here:- Be Bold! Don't let grumpy users scare you off Meet other new users Policies, guidelines, and rules How to create a page, edit a page and write a great article A handy tutorial, and a picture tutorial Writing well Learn from others Play nicely with others Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! Tell us about yourself Be inspired by our finest! You should sign your name on talk pages, discussions and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. Also, if you don't want to jump right into editing articles right now, why not check out the sandbox? Feel free to make test edits there. I know it's a lot of information, but there are two more things I recommend you take note of while editing Wikipedia - cite references wherever possible, and avoid allowing personal biases interfere with your editing. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian - I definitely do. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or problems, leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll try my best to help. Otherwise, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}''' on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. We hope you stick around, and make sure you enjoy yourself! Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ " +" Re. #1: I'm not sure what you mean by ""different ground"". They differ in their POV: While Notable assassinations of the Sri Lankan Civil War is written according to WP:NPOV, Assassinations and murders attributed to the LTTE is functionally a WP:POV fork. (I say ""functionally"" because it historically preceded the other article, so it hasn't been created with that intention. However, I feel that the decision to keep a POV version in addition to an NPOV version amounts functionally to the same as creating a POV fork.) That is certainly not a reason to keep the latter. Re. #2 & #3: I assume you're talking about WP:SIZE. There is absolutely no reason to be worried about that: WP:SIZE is not a policy, but a guideline, so it the statement ""itis agaisnt wikipedia policy"" is simply wrong. The guideline says: ""Readers may tire of reading a page much longer than about 6,000 to 10,000 words"". The article body currently has 935 words, so we're not even close by any stretch of the imagination. Even if we were close, the guideline specifically says: No need for haste. Even if we were beyond the recommandation, there are many other ways to split articles. Splitting it by POV is not the way to do it. In conclusion, I am not convinced by any of the arguments; I don't see any benefit for Wikipedia if we kept the ""... LTTE"" article. Since this is not an official mediation, and since the three opposing editors have not applied for WP:SLR membership, I have no mandate or obligation to represent them. Nevertheless, I want to regard their needs. The fact that we see some unconvincing arguments could indicate that there are other, unexpressed, needs which the ""... LTTE"" article satisfies. If that is the case, then there could be more at stake than just a harmless redirect. If that is the case, then I recommend bringing it up on WP:AFD. — " +Carrie died? It says that Carrie Lee Thornton Miller, Maggie's 107 year old sister, died on 5 Jan 2010. WHERE IS THE CITATION? 218.186.12.250 +" I've just skimmed this drivel I really don't have much time for it and noticed comments by CLIFTONIAN. I need to apologize to this man. I got out of Pattani towards the end of Ramadam and spent a few days in Singapore. Ramadam this year in Pattani was tough (Google ""Pattani Bomb"" to see what I mean, and perhaps look at the IMAGES, too). I got back to Pattani on Friday (the start of HARI RAYA) and had a few drinks. We all did. This was when I wrote my final comments. Yep what I did was wrong. I had no right to disrupt CLIFTONIAN's review. Being slightly drunk is not an excuse. I've checked the guy's profile page and would like to say that I have immense respect for the Israeli armed forces. I hope the guy is safer outside Tel Aviv than we are here in Pattani." +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Big Foot. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +" Wikidata and Interwiki links You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page! Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves. If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata. '''''' Talk To Me! " +Sorry, but Pumpmeup has retired from Wikipedia. How's the weather? - talk about me behind my back +Regarding your edit to Scouting +Austin image Jr1038, Please add your thoughts on the Austin picture here. Thanks. +There are now a whopping SIX independent and reliable sources. Here they all are (including the two previously mentioned): http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=45034&Cat;=5&dt;=5/4/2011 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C05%5C04%5Cstory_4-5-2011_pg13_6 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C05%5C06%5Cstory_6-5-2011_pg13_2 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=45320&Cat;=5&dt;=5/6/2011 http://tribune.com.pk/story/162801/permanently-banning-facebook-court-seeks-record-of-previous-petitions/ http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C05%5C07%5Cstory_7-5-2011_pg3_1 +" It was in unbiased faith which might turn out be ""not good"" for some. " +"==Notability of Umera Ahmed== A tag has been placed on Umera Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +" I kind of disagree with what you're saying. The games are in mostly chronological order. They are in the order of (for PC games) mainframe games > ""Golden Era"" games > Interplay, which straddles the ""Golden Era"" and the late 1990s > the Diablo series, which straddles the late 1990s and early 2000s > new millenium (in general) > and Bethesda, whose recent blockbuster titles are given greatest coverage. If readers are confused regarding the dates, they can just look inside the parentheses (19xx) next to each game. As for the console titles, I think they should be handled separately, as there was not a lot of cross-pollination, and most sources do as well. My 2 cents.  Talk  " +", 25 February 2008 (UTC) I see that you've changed your icons. 110 02:59" +Additions of http://.forexmarketnews.org Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. +No. Curvature does not fully determine the shape of the Universe. A 2-plane and a cylinder (more formally R times S^1) are both flat spaces. They have identical curvature (zero) but they are different shapes. See the first sentence of the article. +" Oh okay, your point is a little clearer. -) Perhaps the dreaded AN/I would be a better venue for this? I don't think that further discussion here will be very productive... — (Talk • Contribs) " +" There is no argument. You seem pretty mad and emotionally charged over nothing. ""Argue"" not even close. There isn't one spot in that original reference that you added, that says they are hardcore punk. I told you about it. Wheres the ""argument"" ? Its cool. I don't need to know why you thought that was accurate. I would bet a million you're going to keep coming back for the last ""statement"". Id let the small stuff in life, go. 73.193.195.69 " +Thanks Many thanks, 198.168.48.157, for removing the vandalism on Lineman (occupation). Regards, +" Welcome! Hello, Pbl1998, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Well Done! Well done PBL I award you with these three badges promoting you to the rank of admin! A barnstar for you! The Special Barnstar Well done PBL for making fine contribs to many articles to do with Woking! Disambiguation link notification for January 8 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Woking F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ebbsfleet, Jack Parkinson and Greg Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013 {| style=""width: 100%;"" | valign=""top"" style=""border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;"" | {| | | width=""100%"" valign=""top"" | Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films |- +Liar. Not one source has been provided that states the official team name is Great Britain. The only way you could argue that's not the case, is if you didn't understand English, which may be the case infact as in those sources given, you even provided a news source that actually supported my position, not yours. I disregarded the previous discussions, as they mostly contain further nonsense of that sort. You can't list any sources, just examples of usage and a whole lot of original research, that's why you don't. And yet here you are, shamelessly arguing that I'm the disruptive one. You're abusing Wikipedia to misinform the world, specifically going against the expressly stated position of the BOA, based on nothing but your own ignorance/arrogance/incompetence. +VIEWS ON SYRIA Galloway's support for the Assad government and stated opposition to an Islamic government in Syria should be added to the article. +Gamma Zee I already know you disagree with me, but I think this game meets the criterion of notability because of its mention on the websites I listed, and other discussion you can easily find via google. What's the difference between this page and, say, Captain Magneto? Or Crystal Quest? And I'd hardly recommend deleting those pages; you'd probably upset a number of users if you did. The wikipedia page doesn't need to contain very much information but I don't see why it should be deleted, and I don't see what harm is done by letting it stay. Personally, I think it adds something useful and relevant to wikipedia. +" I've put an approximate scale on the bottom right. Will you add it to the relevant articles, if you think it's ready, please? All the best— T/C " +TNA is also pretty famous as a retirement home for retired WCW and WWF guys. Mick Foley, for example, retired from WWE and now collects a paycheck (IE social security check) from TNA. The Nasty Boys are also a recent addition to this practice. TNA is kind enough to let these old wrestlers put together matches on TV every so often. +Hello again. Please don't engage in edit warring and please do not write single-sentence stub articles. Thank you. +" How is an external link to a newspaper article about a neighborhood landmark considered ""spam""? Certainly, a newspaper article about the 150th anniversary of the oldest Roman Catholic church in Staten Island (which is located in Rossville) cannot be considered ""spam""! I have resubmitted that external link, and I'd like to ask you to control yourself and not remove it, Mr. Gronowski. Thank you. " +On another note, FUCK U DR NICK YOU POOFY FUCK. +" , I asked some private questions, which are not related to these articles. I asked that he has written that he lives in Holland and he is a native speaker of English, but most of your article are relates to South Asian Ones. Why? Does he have South Asian ancestry? Maybe it was better if she had replied this via email. '''''' talk " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Erick Morillo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing – Gurch " +" coupling_%28UK_TV_series%29 There is a ""Coupling"" episode where his voice is discussed, & which I am not familiar with. Are there stories of his voice? Why not in the article? This could use some grammar: Throughout his career, Howerd hid his potentially career-destroying homosexuality (which had been illegal in Britain until 1967) from both his audience and his mother. In 1955, Frankie met waiter Dennis Heymer, who later became his manager. Dennis was with Frankie for thirty years, both as lighting operator, manager and partner; until Howerd died. Dennis was with Frankie for thirty years, as lighting operator, manager and partner, until Howerd died. [[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. %7e%7e Thank You. -]] " +When are you going to teach me relativistic math and show me how a constant velocity reverses direction from +c to -c when it is still Geschwindigkeit c, junior? I want a relativistic computer like yours and the idiot Dork Van de merde's. Schaefer has one too, but nobody will tell me where I can buy one. All the computers I know of seem to work on Newtonian math. +Still a bit long, but thanks for your work and for taking my comments on board! +Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2015 +}} {{WikiProject United States|class=GA|importance=low |IN=Yes|IN-importance=Low |NE=Yes|NE-importance=Low |WV=Yes|WV-importance=Low +Sounds great to me! Where do you guys want to put your conspiracy link at? I know , build a page on Lavernge and link it there! You can also link your pro-life views without offending, be as pedantic as you two want to be, that is of course until you two realize that your consensus opinions are really collusion tactics to steal someone else's contributions, convert them to your views of WP rules and continuing to refer to yourselves in the first, second and third person on your own bios. Jehera, be in Austin in a few weeks, I'll drop by and we'll discuss a few things, try to keep it in the first person though! Subwayjack +"::Xavier's blog is a limited use reliable source, in that it's reliable source for him making statements about himself. For anything else, it fails. SWATJester Son of the Defender " +adding a ref to the section title is not a good idea, instead use it at the end of a paragraph where the content of the paragraph is being cited to that source. βcommand +at the top right corner +Hello. I notice that you tagged my user_talk page. I have been reverting vandalism by another IP address in various political pages, because an individual continuously is reverting without even stating his/her own viewpoint or any evidence on the associated talk page. I would appreciate it if you would attempt to at least mediate a solution, or use your advanced wikipedia skills to place appropriate tags on the articles recognizing that there is controvery involved. In some instances, I reverted outright libelous comments on pages such as Dave Batters, and they were restored by the vandal. +" Cleaup tag I have placed a cleaup tag as the plot section needs to be fixed. It has horrible sentence structure, mentions things that it hadn't previously mentioned, not to mention several run-on sentences.— dαlus Contribs " +" Re: Ranjit Singh Hi Fellow editor. Just to be clear, I am not in the WP:Edit War on that page. I just reverted to a version before the two edit warriors in question made their edits. I was trying to mediate, but and get WP:Consensus, but they appear not to be able to do this. I really do not want to be involved in this. Thanks " +Your user page Well this is strange, look at this. Not sure what you were doing with this edit but you could have achieved the same result by hitting rollback on yourself with the edit that followed. I see you use Rollback everywhere else, so tell me, did you go to school to be stupid or were you born with this condition? +" Also in Steppin' Razor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLJFRgE4Ywk http://www.jah-lyrics.com/song/peter-tosh-stepping-razor ""If you are duppy You move away from me"" 24.36.54.238 " +Terrible English This article has the worst English in history. +Georges Palante Hello, I added some precisions about the French philosopher Georges Palante, translated from the French article, but I'm not sure of the orthography, so it'll be nice if someone could take a look to correct some of my mistakes. +Romanian represenation to June 28-29 2012 Summit Please modify the Romanian head of the delegation to this Summit from President Basescu to Prime-Minister Ponta according to the EU Council official site. http://www.european-council.europa.eu/media/750848/web_bce_28-29juin_2012.pdf +The article itself is all for global warming with a section called the deniers? As it is a subject that many experts cannot agree on the article itself is very biased. +" Name Hi all, I am handling an OTRS ticket from a senior employee with Tiger's company ETW Corp., regarding the name of Tiger in this article. It is contended unequivocally that ""Tont is not Tiger's middle name"" and that ""his official middle name has always been Tiger"". I have analyzed the references presented here, and two of the three used make no mention of Tont. That leaves only the book; quite frankly, one reference in passing by a book does not outweigh both what Tiger has said himself on television, and what is being contended in this OTRS ticket (#2009061110035594) by someone who is authorised to represent him. I propose that both the ""Tont"" from the lead, and the short sentence relating to how he got it, both of which are sourced to the in-passing remark in that book, be removed. I ask for your comments in forming a consensus before doing so, however.\ Regards, " +Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk) +" Linking Hi, thanks for your work! Just a quick reminder that we don't normally link dates, years, or common terms. Thanks. (talk) " +So I guess your right You seem right, they are in service. Well anyways in the AC Transit roster should be revamp and look like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MTA_Regional_Bus_Operations_bus_fleet&diff;=289008532&oldid;=289007679#Current_active_fleet The AC Transit bus fleet should look like that, hopefully someone overhauls the roster. +Bal 537's edits You are here in Wikipedia just to misguide readers with your eccentric views and false idiology. The marriage of Sikhs, Budhist and Jains are covered under Hindu Marriage Act. This doesnt mean Jains are Sikhs or Sikhs are Budhist. Stop misguiding world with your false information. +I proved how you two knew each other before this article and how you started editing this article only 4 days apart; and you want me to take my accusation of tag-team editing back? +No, you guys are the ones violating consensus and policy, your bald assertions to the contrary not withstanding. +Me and my stabbing knife Are gonna go stabbing... stabbing... stabbing... ...you!!! +Bidgee imagines the Wagga paper is a credible source re Gundagai. So funny. No paper is regarded as a credible source of info. They are largely just words on paper, then when they are corrected, they use the correction as more news. Its also funny how the poor old platypus became politcal. No one does that to magpies. Some humans minds work so weird many times. +26aa. CAREX Linnaeus sect. PANICEAE 26r. CAREX Linnaeus sect. PHACOCYSTIS 26d. CAREX Linnaeus sect. PHAESTOGLOCHIN 26kkk. CAREX Linnaeus sect. PHYLLOSTACHYAE 26g. CAREX Linnaeus sect. PHYSOGLOCHIN 26ddd. CAREX Linnaeus sect. PICTAE 26ii. CAREX Linnaeus sect. POROCYSTIS 26s. CAREX Linnaeus sect. RACEMOSAE 26w. CAREX Linnaeus sect. RHYNCHOCYSTIS 26ss. CAREX Linnaeus sect. ROSTRALES 26iii. CAREX Linnaeus sect. RUPESTRES 26rrr. CAREX Linnaeus sect. SCHIEDEANAE 26eee. CAREX Linnaeus sect. SCIRPINAE 26t. CAREX Linnaeus sect. SCITAE 26vv. CAREX Linnaeus sect. SHORTIANAE 26ww. CAREX Linnaeus sect. SPIROSTACHYAE 26uu. CAREX Linnaeus sect. SQUARROSAE 26o. CAREX Linnaeus sect. STELLULATAE 26v. CAREX Linnaeus sect. THURINGIACA +" I'm saying ""they would be in the article"" because I dislike unreferenced BLPs and would have added them if I had found them. You haven't found anything I didn't find before nominating the article, and dude, what we found spectacularly fails to establish notability. And I get that you're not trying to start a fight - I'm not, either. I just spend too much time at AfD to have a lot of patience for ""They spoke her name! She's notable!"" arguments. (talk ⋅ contribs) " +Here's a Wayback Machine link for what it's worth.24.36.54.238 +"::*Bobolus is not the author of the text. I am. This text was a commissioned translation that the client (presumably by Bobolus on behalf of the subject of the article) has indicated that does not wish to pay for on the basis of his or her belief that the final sentence ""He is married with five children"" suggested that the subject is married to five children. I propose that the line in the article be changed to the correct English ""married with five children"", and if the poster indeed refuses to pay for the translation, then I assert that this text is my intellectual property and therefore should be removed until an article without conflicts concerning intellectual property can be created. " +Thank you for your consideration. I have added another comment to Ace's talk page. Hopefully all will work out good and I can become a healthy contributor to all things ACE Frehley! +For real? A wiki doesn't count as a source on WIKIPEDIA? Ugh, what the fuck. +" In particular: In the second interval, both A and B should be flatted; in the third, there is no G# in the original tetrachord; in the fourth and fifth, there is no B natural in the original tetrachord; in the sixth, there is no A natural in the original tetrachord. I'm also not aware of Webern or Schoenberg using this tetrachord much explicitly. There might be a few of them here or there in their music, but I'm pretty sure it's not a significant feature of either's music (as it certainly is in Carter; I don't know about Perle). I don't think either Webern or Schoenberg even knew of the special properties of this tetrachord. The literature on Webern and Schoenberg that I know certainly doesn't mention this. Mind providing citations? Finally, the second ""External Link"" is dead. It's also questionable: Carter's Night Fantasies is usually cited as the quintessential example of registrally deployed all-interval twelve-tone series, quite a different phenomenon than all-interval tetrachords. There might be all-interval tetrachords within it, though - it'd be nice to have the link fixed so we can see!146.96.130.201 " +Redirect for Wikipedia:WikiProject Darts Hi, I posted a message to you a while back about the deletion of WikiProject Darts which was a redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Darts. Why did you delete it when there are lots of projects that have redirects to their projects called WikiProject Football etc. Could I please get a reply. Thanks. talk +The second message came. I have not done copying such as the indication. +" Ah! Only just found out. No problem, given I didn't know about it and it's now expired. Talk " +" I dont think ""Hinduism"" as such has taken that position. Hinduism is a compendium of traditions and practices. The most one can say is that in certain Vaishnavite traditions he has been absorbed - as Buddha was before - into the system of incanations of Vishnu/Krishna. " +That was not an ultimatum. Maybe admins should try not to support one side in a dispute, or try to assume for once that I'm not some kind of deviant because I have a valid minority opinion. Citing the same sources over and over is a clear indication of bad faith. Please visit this subpage for details about my perspective of the block. +" I would have to look at the 2004 DVD for that, since I only have the VHS from the original broadcast, but I can believe some racism (""Roger of the Raj"") and sexism (""Damassi"" = schoolgirls, from Across the Andes by Frog) raising a PC eyebrow. andemu " +" Notability I have added a notability tag to the article. WP:CORP says: An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. A corporation is not notable merely because it owns notable subsidiaries. The organization or corporation itself must have been discussed in reliable independent sources for it to be considered notable. Examples: If a notable person buys a restaurant, the restaurant does not ""inherit"" notability from its owner. If a notable person joins an organization, the organization does not ""inherit"" notability from its member. WP:CORPDEPTH says: Deep coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond routine announcements and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about an organization......... WP:CORPDEPTH says: trivial coverage [is not acceptable] such as: sources that simply report meeting times, shopping hours or event schedules, the publications of telephone numbers, addresses, and directions in business directories, inclusion in lists of similar organizations,[2] brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business, simple statements that a product line is being sold, changed, or discontinued, routine notices of the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops, quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources, or passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization. WP:CORPDEPTH says: [m Notability is not established by: press releases, press kits, or similar works; self-published materials; any material written by the organization, its members, or sources closely associated with it; advertising and marketing materials by, about, or on behalf of the organization; corporate websites or other websites written, published, or controlled by the organization; any material written or published by the organization, directly or indirectly; Comments? Suggestions?" +My Talk Page As per your edits on my Talk Page this is my Talk Page, thank you. The message in question was a perceived insult and I removed it because I don't wish to be insulted on my Talk Page. Thank you. +Why is there a woman whipping a bird? On the 50 cent student design for the 2006 commonwealth games why is there a woman whipping a bird? What sport does this represent!? +" sorry that wasn´t very clear.. I think Rhyming slang has lost its ""core-users"" ... and this therefore dying out. Most people(& londoners) these days consider themselves middle class therefore are by definition Mockneys. " +low}} }} {{image requested|gymnasts|actors and filmmakers|date=December 2011 +The article The eighth sea has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +Sergecross73 you're a deuchebag that has no life but being here 24/7 and harass users for having a more creative and complete vision and only approves what he deems fit for wiki standards even when 1 provides it sources..freedom of speech, freedom of opinion..i'm sorry but i had to be a little blunt but i just don't agree with how some people do blank edits and yet when others fill them out and try to be more complete you ignore them..now i'm just saying how i feel so i hope more people are as creative and open-minded as me because i don't think people like sergecross would even comprehend what some of us try to do here..and i have spoken to some of your superiors and i'm considering being an admin myself..i wonder how it feels to harass others for having more creativity than me..i guess once i'm admin i can harass people just like you and tell them that their more creative ideas aren't good because i wasn't the one tho thought of it..so that's what it feels to be an admin huh? to harass the wrong people because of their more complete ideas wishing you came up with them first...yeah very mature pal ... +Hey you scum!!! Haha, you've also a warning you raped son of a bitch!!! +" Longest city walls What about Genoa (Italy) fortifications? There is an article on Italian wikipedia, but there is no mention about them on the (much richer and exhaustive) English version! The complete circle of the Genoese ""Mura nuove"" (""New"" since they were built between 1626 and 1639, while, for comparison, the oldest one or the remaining four progressively expanding sets were built before the year 1000) is longer then 20 kilometers. OP 78.6.21.50 " +. TWO EXAMPLES ARE TWO ARTICLES YOU CREATED: Michael Wardian and Bob Glover. I bet you $1,000 more people know of James Hunter (film director) than either one of those cats +you fag WAAA WAAA I'M A HUGE GAY (says you) +roadworks on south wigston services 47/48/49A/85 as of sunday 12th december services 47/48/49A/85 will be revised. routes 47/48 will operate to a revised timetable route 49A will return to its normal route of south wigston but will terminate outside the doctors surgery instead of the pharmacy route 85 will operate along lansdowne grove then blaby road and terminating outside the pharmacy. (source: posters about the changes are posted at all bus stops in the south wigston area these changes are timed with the completion of the roadworks) 82.132.138.156 +Hunter? I removed Hunter from the description of Boötes because in my experience I've never heard it called the hunter. I have heard Herdsman and Bear Watcher, but never Hunter. If someone can come up with some evidence, then sure, but even then it may make more sense in the article about Boötes. +Reason: Don't want unblocked as such, just the right to vanish. +" Reminder Please note that your group should add your topic to our list at Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/User:Piotrus/Spring_2013#Group_projects. | reply here " +" Personally, I am shocked that this sort of statement would ever be appropriate for a Wikipedia article Talk page and if ever there was an appropriate moment for it to be statement would be for the private grievance process that any organization of value would recognize and have previously established if a need have developed. Anyone that would feel comfortable dealing in this particular way I would hope would realize their misjudgment. This type od action poisons minds and unsettles people that are in a setting that is of a making not of their own. Now as for what you said: ""I notice you're not interested in the substance here. Your personal attacks are out of order."" Why on earth would anyone say such a conceited and probably self-serving statement especially when that seems to be in reply to someone cautioning you about what you say of others who replied to your reasoning of an issue and were not swayed. Not only that but that YOU felt compelled not to rest your argument for an issue on your own efforts but to bring in others to whom YOU showed their work and seemed more than happy to return an unfavorable review. If I were charged with building support for an issue and wanted that effort thought on the reasons I presented then I certainly would not say that your work is no good because others have told me. What makes you think that what others not in the process of that deliberation trump the work of others? Was this brought on because someone was so forthcoming in an attempt to check your ulterior motives with the statement: ""Any nullification sourcing from you provides much more indication of what value it holds."" Especially when that same person says, ""I am not here to actively make enemies and disrupt others. All I can say is that I reiterate my statement and that to yours, ""Take on a world with no problems, you take on problems and stand alone."" You are a trouble maker! And probably a sour sport. If any one is not interested in the efforts of Wikipedia is would appear just by your effort in this one section by itself. You can cry wolf only so many times before irritation precedes you. You just may have shown your true colors. Am I to encounter this type of motive in every article in Wikipedia or are your type in the single numbers and far and few between? Can anyone else speak to this. How should it be reported to the Amins at Wiki for at least review and potential resolution." +October 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (talk contribs friendly) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. +" Well. On first look it seems like it's notable enough so I would suggest you start a WP:SANDBOX page titled ''User:HornToadXi/ArticleName;; and I'll review your work there and give you relevant tips (see also Wikipedia:Tutorial). Once the article reaches a basic level we can move it into the main-space. Hope this helps you get started, let me know if there's any questions. Chalk Talk " +" Movie plots Hello... sorry to have to say this, but please refrain from deleting ""Plot"" sections, as you did at The Day After and The Descent. While The Day After could in fact use a trim, the proper approach is to tag it or rewrite it - not to delete the entire section. As for The Descent, the plot section was not overly long, and we don't remove material because of ""spoiler"" concerns. (Readers are expected to understand that an encyclopedic article will probably contain this sort of material.) Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about this. Thanks. ''''''chatspy " +" When the category was created there was only one person in the category. I don't know anything about the American Protestant groups, so if you need to, you can create the category. Please use Category:Southern Baptist Convention when categorizing individuals who are Southern Baptist.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) " +Corporate governance question Wikipedia has an aricle for Gerald W. Grandey. While Gerald Grandey's bio suggests this might be the same person, I'm not 100% sure. If someone can confirm, that would be great.108.173.199.171 +" I inserted the column of headings every 5-6 software descriptions to address this concern Trödel " +List of VFL/AFL records I just wanted to say great work on the page; i added a list and i will be updating it at the end of each round. If you have any ideas of what else could be added to the page i would be glad to help. +Reworked this one and a few others. +REDIRECT Talk:The O₂ (London) +It's already done. Now you have got to delete the word 'prominent' and that's it. +" Frank The Entertainer In A Basement Affair I saw that you undid the latest update from me, here is where I found the last names of Kerry, Dana, and Cathy. I found their last names on NYDailyNews.com and search ""Frank Moresco is looking for love from his parent's basement in VH1's 'Frank the Entertainer'."" If you don't believe me here's the source Other than that, thanks for reading. 8 January 2010 (UTC)" +" Well, yes and no... The Munida page on WoRMS shows two identical taxa listed under Munida, but doesn't explicitly say that they're the same as the ones listed as genera in Munididae. (Indeed, if that connection had been made, they probably wouldn't be listed additionally as genera.) I realise that's a pretty fine distinction, but it is important. We all think they're erroneous, but we don't have a source to cite for that; I doubt that Komai (2012) states that the two things listed on WoRMS ""are erroneous entries"", yet you claim Komai as a reference for that. We're in danger of slipping back into original research here. I'd like to see Komai's paper before I commit myself, but I think the current wording will have to be changed. (I might add that the personal attack you made is plainly unhelpful. Note also that the version you ""fixed"" is very different from the one at the centre of the dispute, so boasting about how easy it was may not be warranted.) " +Pyoderma gangrenosum pictures Sorry for taking so long to get back to you but I am trying to learn this site, and it's slow going sorry to say. Anyways, I have the pictures I told you about but I don't understand yet how to show them. So, I would like to email them to you, if that's ok, along with the email giving me permission to share the photos. Please email me back and let me know how you feel about this and how to do it from Microsoft Outlook. I have at least a half a dozen photos to share for the article for you to choose from. They are very graffic. Thanks, +Marshall do you really believe in the things that you have written here. Which sub comission which document says that UN accept and name the event as genocide. Please research this one you will see not only the world but naive armenians are missled by their Diaspora and goverment. +Talk:Nigger Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ☎ +Hi I'm Can't Nobody Step To Me Hi I'm User:Can't Nobody Step To Me. I've been blocked because of my brother making personal attacks again. I've logged in under my sister's account to tell you that when I login, incorrect password entered. So I choose to email new password but it never comes maybe because they think I'm Shakim67. Can someone help me? I need help, Because I'm just tired of this and I can't wait to login and can someone see how many days are left until I am unblocked. Thank You +You sodomites really know how to stick together....yech !!!! anyhow, tomorrow is another day. furthermore, i rotate ip addresses about every 2-3 days........Keep on Suckin' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.88.222.103 +"::::For reasons I won't go into here I no longer have access to the kind of library I used to have, so gathering sources can be a problem at times. (It may seem ridiculous, but my original reason for becoming an editor was the appalling standard of English on many articles - I was actually only going to be ""tidying up"" until I could get my library back together). That is also why you may have noticed that I tend stay out of debates about RS and verifiability. In the near future I will have better access to sources, so for now I will tend to concentrate on issues of style and neutrality (avoiding ""myth"" where possible). That way, the lack of a library is a slight hindrance, rather than a handicap. " +Saleh Why is the word Saleh above the Dr. Who image on the upper right side of the article? I can't seem to see it when I am editing the page. I couldn't find any reference to that word and the Dr. THC Loadee +commnder keane is not welcome here +That's interesting, did Stalin visit him in a Mexican Prison to present him with the Order of Lenin? Or is it a fact that it was Khrushchev who gave it to Mercader years later (after the death of Stalin)? And how exactly does any of the above prove that Stalin ordered the assassination of Trotsky? +This address has been blocked for 48 hours for being used for evasion of an existing block - see Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Evasion_of_blocks. +" Groovy, thanks. 說嗎? " +Images Try adding {{Magazinecover}} to the magazine covers. This produces the following: Hope that helps? (Talk) +"::::::""You know? My neighbor is famous and I think he's gay. The people down the road hate his guts and have surely testified. Some have told me that these people have said so, but some other people don't have a clue or care one way or the other, while some have actually investigated the matter and found it nothing.""' 24.255.11.149 " +" Yes it does, try changing the width of the window here. «Talk» PS As for Grove, do you have another source which has corroborated Grove's statement. His is the only paper on the Doji bara famine. The Doji bara famine, moreover, predates any censuses of British India (which began in 1871). His mortality statistics are based on methods that are conjectural and not rigorous. Moreover, Grove is an environmental historian, not a historian of colonial India, and consequently, not able to assign political blame. Is there any reference in the paper to the administration of British India? Is there any evidence (by way of political culpability) in the paper to back up this one isolated sentence? Cherry picking isolated sentences in the one and only paper on a topic (involving less than rigorous methods) is WP:UNDUE. As Jimbo Wales himself says, ""If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Wikipedia regardless of whether it is true or not and regardless of whether you can prove it or not, except perhaps in some ancillary article."" In this case, Grove is the only author that has blamed the British, and that too only for not providing relief from the famine, not for causing the famine. So, best not to keep beating the Grove-one-sentence-quote-horse to death. «Talk» " +Igor Goldkind wasn't editor, he provided the PR. Steve MacManus was the editor. Changes made to reflect this. Could the link to Third World War be returned? I've compiled some lengthy notes on Book 1 which I should have distilled into a qualifying entry by the end of the month? AL 6 Jan 2008 +" [Headline text]#REDIRECT Italic textStrike-through textSubscript text " +" Just a ping, in case you have forgotten. If you have not forgotten, and just have not had time, feel free to disregard this message. Pounce! " +y0u l0se at life. 0h n0, my last chance? what d0 i d0? what i d0?! thanks f0r repeatedly qu0ting the rule b00k f0r me, cuntmuffin, i was having tr0uble finding it 0n my 0wn. when i was 14 i had better things t0 d0 than be an encycl0pedia nazi, y0u ass-hat maker. die in a fire. +OIH!!!! WHY WHY WHY U REVERT MY EDIT?? IF U DUN LIKE ROTI CANAI U CAN DUN SEE IT U IDIOT~ EXPLAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I +"comments left for other people before they do? gabsadds 01:31, 20 October" +Whats the definition of a definition then? +" May 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Artemis, you will be blocked from editing. ''''''talk " +" We can probably change it a summary, like ""the claimed behaviour of homeopathic dilutions lacks an objective explanation"". " +he is iran national team vooleyball palayer so he is famous | +I only put in an image of the virus on the right since it had so much whitespace. +Regulatory I see that there is a little battle going on over where to put the FDA and other regulatory stuff. My opinion is that it should go with the relevant product sections, ie., dressing clearance with dressings, topical with topical and alt. med with alt. med. I think that we need to reinforce the fact that there are approved/cleared uses and compounds and OTC quackery that has been the subject of FDA restrictions. +Pretending not to understand plain English is only one of the trolling techniques they employee. I'm not sure if the repeated threats are trolling or just harrassment or both. - +well what u said before really hurt me SO U SHOULD BE BLOCKED BITCH TITS UR A PUSSY THATS WHAT U ARE HIDING AND BEING AN EDITOR A SUPER GEEK 24 HOURS A DAY ON THE COMPUTER HAVE NO LIFE I BET U HAVE NO SEX LIFE EITHER JUST FUCKING STRIPPERS GEEK GEEK GEEK GEEK GEEK ILL BALL U UP +, as they are in Canada to the present day +" Thanks very much. I'm going to start processing the links etc for the completed checklists. We may not finish it all in time but at least we'll get some of it done.  talk " +You don't need to use every time, and you definitely don't need it on my page. -) In any case, at first glance, it appears that you've included sufficient independent sourcing to establish the notability of the article, so I suspect it will be ok. I don't have the final word on that, of course the decision ultimately belongs to the community. I don't know what the problem with the magazine cover is, but it looked fine when I checked it earlier. I'll take a look at it later and see if there's still a problem. +oh i bet you are little boy. now go up stairs, your mummy made your lunch +" Please be alert: See discussion above, i.e. the manyfold problems (with utmost costs involved) with paticularly the Budapest and Amsterdam ""Combino's. Further for the last, see: Dutch version. Ing. D.A. Borgdorff, Rtd. C.R&D.O.; HTM:nl:GTL8, EL.PEng. > " +" ""Just so that you know"" huh?" +There is no problem really. So, some are born here, some are born there. Now, every time has its place. All along a trail, so why not following it? In a good way, we are attached to places and find reasons to stay, and so far, to be, or to have been in Oregon is a good thing! +I am unaware of any outstanding requests for Arbitration in respect of this individual. Should one be filed, I will give consideration to your request. +REDIRECT Talk:Sulfide stress cracking +Hello Smelly Skunk... how come that you again changed it.. you are a stupid asshole... like your ancestors you gobbled greedily fecal materials. +" Speedy deletion of Diskin+Orphanage A tag has been placed on Diskin+Orphanage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. | Talk " +I think that the ultra-structure of the chief cells and oxyphil cells should be included. It is interesting to see what the mysterious oxyphil cells look like under the electron microscope. +Hi Tom, Sorry to see you are blocked again. I'll bring your issue up on the administrator's noticeboard there is a lot of edit-warring on that article and all should be spoken to. +Dude! How'd you do your photo? I can't do mine! It just shows me the link, but no photo! How did you do yours? +Have you declared your previous account in that case as per Doppleganger? +User:Pharos/List of political party ballot symbols by U.S. state No ), it's a five-pointed star. Unfortunately, this is the only article we have on five-pointed stars. The symbol of the Right to Life Party is really a fetus though; it appears right on the ballot. +Siege of Port Arthur Since you removed the merge tag from this article, could you set forth your reasons why this article shouldn't be merged with Battle of Port Arthur? It is listed as a candidate for merging in the To Do template, which implies that at least one other person would disagree strongly with you. 21:58, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC) +Ok understood thanks. I'll take a look at using some references I have researched to support the body of the article instead. ( ) +Enough As has been stated, user pages belong to the community. As a result, while there is more leeway, what you have been doing has exceeded the bounds of what many people consider good taste. You have already been asked by more than one admin to stop so please do so. Thanks - +Your User Page Is Inaccurate. Why does your user page still display inaccurate information, Ghandi? +Transclusion I've set up pages for each season of the show and moved the episode list data there. I have copied the transclusion system used at List of Lost episodes to ensure the information on the season pages and the main list remains consistent. I note that there is a perceived loss of functionality to the list from some anonymous editors. I think having a shorter main list with more detail on the season pages is preferable and follows a precedent set by the Lost episodes featured topic. I would like to emphasise that no information has been removed and all of the short synopses I worked hard on are still available on the season pages. However, I'm happy to change the transclusion if lots of people want the entirety of the information to be duplicated. I have included main article links to each of the season pages under each season header in the main article and hope that readers interested in finding out more information will go on to the season pages from the main episode list. +"And besides, I just responded in the same tone, look at edit summaries, ""Syriac Christians are not a group of people. Its like sayinng Hebrew Jews. Stop writing nonsense please"", ""The name of the article is not Syriac Christians. please be constructive"", ""Baz has always been a nestorian settlement. I'm not sure if you know what your doing anymore"", ""please learn to use the talk page before moving pages to controversal names"", etc. " +Are you stupid or what? Moron, if you block me you have only hurt the Wikipedia project, as I was trying to help remove some OBVIOUS BULLSHIT that even a reatarded grade school kid can tell is bullshit, from an article. Are all Wikipedia admins as stupid as you? +Agreed. I put up the notice. (I don't know enough about the subject to fix it well.) +" Hoyle and Sheldrake mentioned in Milton's book Independent book review of Milton's book ""he throws in a bit of Jung and Sheldrake, along with Fred Hoyle's theory that life originated in outer space"" (panspermia) " +Jamais Fomos Modernos The band was formed in 2010, December 12th, during Ken Vandermark’s concert at Santander Cultural in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Featuring Bode, who has for eleven years worked with the noise/ambient/electronics scene on his own and side projects, making live appearances at cultural institutions in Porto Alegre and releasing his work through netlabels and cd-r distros; Bruno, a drummer of various styles, but having jazz and free improv as his main focus; CP, a bass player that was part of what is believed to be the ever seen only Double Trio of Punk Rock and Diego, a Basement Solo clarinet player without audience, making freely improvised music, noise and structured improvisation. The Name of the band is homonymous to the Antropology Essay by Bruno Latour – We’ve Never Been Modern -, published in 1991. Time has passed and new instruments were added, like flutes, whistles, harmonicas, kazoos, toys, small percussion and aleatory objects, following the intuitive direction that each session offers. As of Mats Gustafsson Show (FIRE), on 2011 may 15th, the band recorded 30 cd-r to be distributed among the free jazz/free improv aficionados. +" Speedy deletion of Charlene ""Charlie"" McGee A tag has been placed on Charlene ""Charlie"" McGee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - (Talk to me) " +Deleting it doesn't make the problem go away, it creates a new problem +" The piece of classical strings music that Mankind initially used as his entrance theme is Samuel Barber's ""Adagio For Strings"" " +" What happened to your barnstars? The Missing Barnstar Hi the I was recently checking out your awards page and was shocked to see you have only recevied one in all your hard years of service, so here is one to show that yyour work will not go unnoticed; even if it takes along time too notice it. (also you could put on the thank you thing I gave you!) (Hi Hi There is a lot of stuff saying 'Hi' in the raw typing as the picture messes up the writing! (Hi Hi ''lemming'''' " +" TO ALL READERS In ""administration"" here are siting only polish chauvinistes (nazis). The pages about Lithuania and Vilnius are one entire falsification. They erase all corrections which are unpleasure to their fascist mind. I can't understand this system. But we strike out what to do. Vilnietis" +" In the introduction: ""Henry, previously seen by many in the sport as a fair footballer, was labelled by many in the aftermath as a cheat[2]"" This needs an additional citation for the first part ([2] only refers to him now being labelled a cheat). Henry has never been a fair footballer, the match has just brought to light the foul play he has ALWAYS used to get an upper hand (even the biased french and arsenal fans realise). Furthermore, the quote by Wenger that ""he is one of the fairest players I have managed"" holds no weight since: 1) It is a biased view from a man who managed Henry for years. 2) It is a view from a man who has managed a great number of cheating players during many years at Arsenal so saying Henry is one of the fairest isn't saying much. In summary I think that the line should be changed to: ""The incident brought to light the true extent of Henry's bad sportsmanship."" Simon" +Contested deletion This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) No links what so ever, just explaining accomplishments. +i have been so kind and your blocking me anemoneprojectors because i have been kind +" IMO the ones in this article aren't bad. But they are not related to the point I brought up. North8000 " +" The 2009 White House criticism of Fox News I love the fact that the section is titled ""THE"" 2009 Criticism of Fox News. As if there is anticipation of there being a section titles ""THE"" 2010 Critism of Fox News. That is so classic wikipedia. I have to hand to you guys, you really outdid yourselves this time. Bravo Bravo Bravo. As if thats not enough, lets create a whole article with the same title, 2009 White House criticism of Fox News and while we're at it, lets go ahead and create one for 2010 White House Criticism of Fox News right now, since we all know there will be one soon enough. Gosh, we only have two months left, lets not miss that boat. Heck, if we are really good, we can get it to WP:GA by Christmas. Whoopie, This is great, I love bashing Fox News. I can't wait until 2012, so we can bash whatever candidate attempts to run against the democrats. For those of you with no funny bone, this was meant as sarcasm, but did I really have to say it, Um..........YA I guess I did. " +December 2009 Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Caron Hudye, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. +" Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but that doesn't make an opinion correct. Ultimately, I agree with WCM that this discussion has headed towards a pointless direction. Using either ""native"" or ""native-born"" is standard in academic literature, and I really don't care which of the two options are chosen. Also, please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum, so please let's try to keep opinion-based discussions to a minimum. This is an academic setting (even if somewhat informal), and discussions should be primarily based on sourced evidence (and not in passionate [mis]interpretations). Regards.— Talk " +Two problems with that statement: You're the only one here diagreeing with me and this isn't a quality list, it's a tower of redundant and summarized information usable only as a quick reference. Like the rest of the stuff presented here, the theme music is a large element relevant to the widened subject matter of the article and can be very simply and concisely summarized here. - +Call of Duty: Black Ops II In response to protest against SGF, we support Google Translate to include your Kazakh language on September. All must translate Call of Duty: Black Ops II and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 into Kazakh soon. +Sources for opposition to naturopathic medicine American Cancer Society http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/mindbodyandspirit/naturopathic-medicine American Academy of Family Physicians http://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/naturopathic.html http://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/advocacy/workforce/gme/ES-FPvsNaturopaths-110810.pdf no names -> (Some) Critics -> explicitly quantifying (two)... LOL. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Politico-media_complex&diff;=145899968&oldid;=145707660 Well, as you saw fit to edit Block ... it's back to your original now (all your work) ... well, we're back again. It's like Groundhog Day innit my dear Block? +" This won't by itself be more o a precedent than the 1000 or so this year claiming similar incompatibilities between the twoI've argued both ways from time to time, for the contradiction can be used to get any desired result. If anything, it shows we need flexible rules, for after all the real point is ""suitable for an encyclopedia such as WP"", & if WPedians disagree on what that isas WPedians do, & in very basic ways, there is no way we can juggle fixed rules to gloss over the differences. Current idea: 2 RSs only as the default in case there is no decision on other grounds. Personally, I'd add, keep if its in the de WP (except perhaps for purely German figures) I trust them more than en WP not to include if not appropriate, and why should we try to decide everything in every separate WP. '''''' " +HE CANT BAN PEOPLE! AND EVEN IF HE COULD ITS NOT BIGGY! HE'S JUST A LITTLE BABY WHO THOWS HIS TOYS OUT THE PRAM WHEN HE DOESN'T GET HIS PATHETIC WAY! +THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST 207.190.244.74 +Please note on the user in question has been asked to go to the talk page for just this purpose more than once. I and another user in October have asked this person to not post this information on the page, as the information is not pertaining to the page. You will also find that the user refuses to discuss it, but continues to post her information anyway, continuously. +" The Passage The Passage is good, but some of the language needs to be put into more readable modern English, I have a 1907 photograph, but it's very similar to one which is there. If you want me to edit the English just say - it's fine as it is, but just not very flowing. Incidentally some English books seem to spell it ""The Passazh"", perhaps there should be a redirect page too. Regards | talk " +added category publisher. +I added the part about the guidelines. Feel free to revert/disagree. +" Hm...This does seem to pose a problem here. With your persecution of my userpage, I did what you said. I kept the Roman stuff my userpage. I don't know how Shakespeare has anything to do that quote with the ArbCom. There's no reference to RA and Dagizza in it. Dagizza was stalking me as shown here: , , , , , . ArbCom ruled on ""Lack of evidence"" and I haven't been blocked before. Keep in mind that I never vandalized any pages or articles or used sock or meat puppets. ArbCom ruling did not mention anything about blocks. Nothing in enforcement. NYB seems to have a twisted view of the rulings. Use sticks and not your block buttons. NYB seems to have created the ""ruling"" unilaterally, nowhere does it mention anything about blocks. That the Shakespearean quote was not related to anything. I can't put anything Roman because you accuse me of using metaphors for an Arbcom. So kindly unblock me and leave me alone. Jesus christ....9_9....this is death of the republic. A man can't even take a break in peace or edit his userpage. " +Edits of National Civic Council Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately I have reverted the edits you made to the above article based on the apparent conflict of interest you have with your username. I ask you to please read WP:ISU, which says Wikipedia policy does not allow usernames that appear to represent a company or organization. There are a few things we need to discuss. We can discuss your proposed changes to the article at the article's talk page. But edits under your current username will not be accepted on the article itself. If you are related to the organization, you will need to change your username so that it complies with Wikipedia's policies regarding names. I can help you with the process if necessary. Of course, you are not required to disclose any personal information about whether you are or not related, it is a voluntary issue. If you are related to the organization, that means you have a conflict of interest. Please read the policies regarding COI, so that we can collaborate on the article talk page and make the changes you think are necessary. Please contact me via my talk page if you have any questions or need help. Regards, +=Reverts Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's WP:REVERT policy before performing reverts on good faith edits. Please be advised that you are to revert a good faith edit only as a last resort rather than as a primary option. Please also note that you are expected to be familiar with the revert policy before posting notices to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring as is clearly stated on that page. Failure to adhere to this policy prevents peer likelihood to assume good faith and has a negative impact on the Wikipedia community. +Tiresome is people who make false accusations of vandalism, and people who tell me to use the talk page when I already did. Kindly fuck off if you don't even have the basic courtesy to do what you so snottily ask others to do. 201.215.252.50 +Stop Editing you stupid a-hole, stop editing stuff on wikipedia, your going to get this whole school banned, about your stupid arguments about some fcuking naruto character. +It's pretty obvious that Mark Calaway is nothing like the Undertaker. Mark Calaway is a totally different person if you look up information about him anywhere. Everyone knows that. +butt fucking me last night +Deposed royals don't just stop having titles attributed to them, or using them themselves because a country has become a republic. I have no idea what his Swiss passport will say, if he even has one, and I don't see what relevance it has either. I very much doubt someone would think think a title 'Prince of Russia' is part of his name. Titles and names are clearly distinct and separate. - +, PA | Mitch Fraas |- |   | Library Company of Philadelphia Cassatt House 1320 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA | Nicole Scalessa |- | (7:00 p.m. close)   | Temple University The Samuel Paley Library, Ground floor 1210 Polett Walk Philadelphia, PA | Matt Shoemaker |- |   | Chemical Heritage Foundation 315 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA See Directions. | Mary Mark Ockerbloom |} +You seem to have an issue with Executive Orders being published. Please, explain yourself on why this is? Besides PERSONAL bias opinions. Jason +" As the removing editor, I agree SmithBlue & John Dalton. No Criminal infobox. It's little more than a POV sticker. Let the article tell the full story. '''''' [ contribs ] " +hey hey persian gal. i have got a couple of your pubes from when we had some naughty fun back at school. up 4 cyber? +look thisis what im bout to say ke key or wheva im not shure waht chick u mean but hes mines like bow wow said never find a shortie like mine.he is doing big,and romeo but hes mines! hallh!!!!!!!! +Thanks for the advice. So it is ok to write what was said instead of making a direct quote? +NIVIX LIKES TO SUCK SPURIOUS Q'S COCK AND SPURIOUS Q LOVES TO SUCK NIVIX'S COCK! +wer do u live wer do u live marybelle i wanna fuk u +" Speedy deletion of Roger Demulder Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Roger Demulder, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (T / C) " +Chough Re your oppose on Red-billed Chough, and the need for a fresh pair of eyes, I asked you for help at 0658 on 23 March, but reply came there not. Thanks a lot. +I don't give a fuck about the personal attack shit. The Pats win 35-21. Ohh ya, wouldya block me yet, or are there rules about that shit too? +Palpatine's Appearance I know the what the official Star Wars databank says, and it can still be left open to interpretation. Just because the lightning caused his face to change doesn't mean it physically deformed his facial tissue. I also don't care about what Pablo Hidalgo says, as this is still a secondary source. Rick McCallum said a few years back that Boba Fett was not going to be in Episode II, and was he correct? No. The lightning burning his tissue theory doesn't make any sense in accordance to the behavior previously exhibited by Force Lightning interacting with the human body. We've seen Palpatine use equally powerful Force Lightning on Luke, did that deform Luke? No. Dooku used Force Lightning on Anakin, did that deform Anakin? No. Just because the lightning was deflected doesn't make its effects on the human body any different. Seriously, why do you think his Sith eyes appeared along with the changes? Don't tell me the lightning caused those too... you're smarter than that. And does Force Lightning make your fingernails grow? Please. +" ""You should be able to include your opinion."" I think not. Ever heard of WP:NPOV. GW_Simulations | Talk " +"== KEWLopolis == KEWLopolis has not changed its name to Cookie Jar TV yet and will not until September 19, 2009. So please do not update the article until September 13, 2009. Talk " +In broad strokes, this looks like the right kind of outline for a biography. Be sure to take a look at some other scientist biography articles to see how the very beginning of article is expected to look. (The entire lead section should be a concise summary of the article, while the begging of the lead section is an even more concise summary, highlighting the most important things you'd want a reader to know if they were going to stop after one paragraph, and the first sentence can be thought of almost like a dictionary definition of the topic of the article.) There must be a mistake in either the date of death (1955) or the date he took over as editor of Physiological Zoology (1957). +Richard Wright I'm a little surprised Richard Wright is on the list of ant-communists. He was a Communist Party member and later became a critic of the Party. However, I do not think this was an ideological shift but more of a break over the autoritarian controls of the Party. Unless someone has a good source, I think its a stretch to call Wright an anti-communist when the article focuses on the ideological ideal rather than the Communist Party. +www.angtamangdaan.com Please delete any instances of this link if someone tries to readd it. It is run by the Ang Dating Daan organization who has been engaged in a perennial tit-for-tat with the INC, and therefore its validity is doubtful, much like a profile on the Ford Mustang sponsored by General Motors. +Dear Jeff G. Why do my edits keep getting automatically reverted? What they heck? +Dude this is how Blaxthos operates. He GAMES the system to hype his FAR LEFT liberal agenda, then when he is busted, he sets up a dungeons and dragons type wikipedia trial to oust you accusing you of the VERY things he's guilty of. Wikipedia in general and Blaxthos in particular have a LONG AND SORDID history of doing this. The fact that Wik allows him to run amok is more of an indictment of them than him. He's just a psycho. They PRETEND to be an objective encyclopedia. PS He also accuses EVERYONE who exposes him of being the SAME person. It's called liberal-wik-sockpuppet syndrome. haha 68.40.123.217 +" all full of presumption and you are also wrong, Mr. ""I-Know-Better-Than-You-So-Listen-Here-And-Let-Me-Tell-You-What-Your-Intention-Was"".) You are also" +Have you read this, Verbal? Two years ago you were one of the editors who insisted that large portions of the Seth Material article be moved to a separate page and edited there, instead of in situ. Maybe you don't know the rules on Wikipedia as well as you think. +Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! +" Strictly original research, but I don't recall ""Light Bulb Johnson"" getting hardly any coverage, while ""Tricky Dicky"" was well-known. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→ " +a gentle warning By now it should be evident to you that many other editors are watching the Billy Joel article, and that all the time you spend trying to remove joelfan.com and switch it with your own spam link is wasted effort. Wikipedia operates by consensus, and the consensus is clearly against you. +" Speedy deletion of Kurt lockhart A tag has been placed on Kurt lockhart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. └''''''┘┌talk┐ " +" It is not the official site, just one official social site. We also don't shove links to official YouTube channels etc in articles just because they exist. And considering Viz itself does not even bother linking directly to it, how can you confirm it is the official site? And what makes it notable if the company itself doesn't acknowledge it?  (talk · contribs) " +Bothwell was a real jerk. Serious jerk. +Fredom/opennes/licenses Is it free software? What is the license. Those are important issues but not mentioned in the article. +File:West Ruislip station 2002.jpg|A picture of West Ruislip station in 2002. File:Dorridge over view 2010.jpg|A picture of Dorridge station in 2010. File:Priory estate 2010.jpg|A picture of Dudley's Priory estate in 2010. +":::I still havent had mine out yet, cant be very wise. (Corny joke alarm). Let me know if you are writing on tuesday please. By the way, have you seen this: Wikipedia:Esperanza/User_Page_Award? ''''ez " +Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. .You vandalized Brokeback Mountain. +":A couple of points. One, Beck and O'Reilly are quite different both in style and in ideas. Two, the words that you quote come in the context of a lead section that summarizes the opinions of both Beck's detractors and his supporters (for whom he is a ""conservative champion"" and a defender of ""traditional American values from secular progressivism""). Basically, that's the Beck bio's equivalent of saying that O'Reilly's commentary has drawn both praise and criticism. While I admit that the Beck lead is more specific and certainly more flamboyant, I think it is probably less encyclopedic. " +And I would very much like to know who you think you are and who appointed you on that page? For your knowledge Meru was officilly placed here to watch this talk page by mediator Nicholas Turnbull, and this talking is in the process on entering the arbitation comity, so your interventions here are so outplaced as they can be! I talked with Nicholas Turnbull tonight who disagree with your actions. You are not appointed here and do not have to make decisions above the heads of the members of the arbitration comity, so you will be very kind to step aside and anihilate your previous doing. This is not your playground. I do not know what are your motives to acting as you do as nobody has ever seen you here, but you do seems to go at it with a revenge. Any reasons who would be worth mentioning now? You have just been elected admi and the first thing you do is blocking and banning fox from a site you don't know and that you were not aware of for 24 hours ago. This don't go, you are overstepping wikis rules and previously made decision about this talkpage. You are acting very unbalanced and provocating a chaos who wasn't there before and who in fact wasn't there as far as the 22th of september. Isn't your role to make things work? Another veru very important thing is that you are walking on my article about a Settlement Proposal, that I do recommend you to read carefully, and that you don't have answer to in your recents edits above, and who therefor have no place what so ever under my article and as a part of it. So moove your articles above, to follow suite of your childrens fights, and leave the growing up doing the right thing. This article above was the one I was writng and in fact inserted in Meru own talk page before you made your intrance here, and before the situation degenerated that much. I did it in an attempt to calm tempers down and create a new tangible goal with better opportunity to solve this dilema than revert war and banishments war. I was stopped at inserting my article by constant editing of article from people fighting, and had each time to perform some changement of my article before saving it, at the end it was too late, you hade arrived, talk like césar, ban a person wihtout valuable and argued explainations, without warning, and taken over the role assignated to Meru by N. Turnbull a few days ago. By the time I arrived to save my article about burrying the hachet, heads had already rolled, thanks for you. For your knowledge, you did it at midnight, a saturday evening, and this kind of action will have required the presence of more users, and an agreement between those. Your opinion about the presence of Igor or not on his talkpage is none of your business, but the business of the arbitration comity and their decision, not yours. You will have to be more patient and leave to other the right to decide. Know your chain of command, and the wikis appointed chain of event before a ban can take place, specialy a definitiv ban! What about the other guy who begin this reverting phase all together? isn't he guilty as well or is he your personnal friend in the discussion forum? For if this is the case, and if you do have preferences for who is right and who is wrong, so you shouldn't be here and make interventions as well. You have to stay neutral, but your judgement sounds arbitrary to me, to the point that even your collegue Meru didn't understood what and why you were doing this and disagreed. Why are you making troubles, and tell me why the alone person who support your actions, is rjb, the exact person known for insulting peoples very often, reverting all the time, and having started this reverting war completely iognoring previous concensus made about the contain of the biography on this talk page. He was destroying the work of people, to who it had taken several weeks to obtain. You didn't baned him, why? Is he your socket puppet, or are you his? What were you doing 6 hours ago and why did you came here? Did someone warned you? What triggered your hush at coming by, first time, so late? I would very much like to know. You will please move your dispute and different blowings up on one another on a different place, and will take your bad saturday night mood swing somewhere else than on this talkpage, unless you have a satisfactory explaination for what just did happened. You can't ban Igor when Holger Beck Nielsen is going to make an intervention on this talk page. I hope you know who this person is. i do notice that the 2 persons who made reverting a war, and insisted on it are ybm and rjb who are both in very close contact with each other, and in fact I am quiet sure that rjb is The socket puppet of YBM. This way he can do it again and again and +" Fair enough. From what I understand, Goble must have originally published this for KP, and then put it in his blog as well..as is the case with many journalists these days and social media, throw it on the blog, twitter, facebook, etc. just to get it out there, right? Several other news outlets cite the Goble article as being from KP, not his blog. What was the reason for delying the EurasiaReview source / line about onging debate? The ER article quoted political figures on their stance on the issue; if it's just some bloggers in a ""flash mob"", why would politicians/senators/etc even care enough to comment on it? '''''' " +To add, a centrally-maintained list reduces the maintenance burden quite considerably and effectively insures that changes will be propagated to all categories. Considering that R templates are somewhat unstable, I think the use of the navbox is judicious. +Forgetting is an unconscious act, Dr. K. Pretending to forget is something different... +Yes you are correct they should be under certain headings. I will be attempting to fix the categories up more also. +Please check additions to Haunted Castle at Six Flags Great Adventure Cliff... Please review my additions to the Haunted Castle at Six Flags Great Adventure. I wrote a book, and I am publishing it on my website for free. I just added this fact, spelled out on the page http://www.popartpete.com/hauntedcastle_main.html I also still cannot add sources to the bottom. If I could, it would be easier to verify. Please let me know if what is changed is okay. It's a totally free link, so it can't be spam. No one is asked or obligated to buy anything. I just want a way for people to be directed to the free book online, so everyone can enjoy. +Editing My Own User Page is Not Vandalism == -bitch == +Relative prevalence of savantism This may be a tangent to a previous discussion, and I was going to place it in Autistic Savant, but this article seems to get more attention -) Is there any research that demonstrates that savantism is more prevalent among autists than in the general population? It seems to me that non-autistic people can have extraordinary abilities as well, and those might go underreported as they're not as interesting as the autistic savant. +It's been demonstrated multiple times by multiple editors. That you did not WP:HEAR is no longer surprising. +"*Check this out. Apparently Buckles served for a short time in the New York National Guard. We should add that. - • Talk • Coor. Online Amb'dor • " +Sounds good. Could you mention it on WP:VP? I am going to sleep now. +[I am sorry, I wrote this stupid sentence at about 2 o'clock in the night; the definition is perfectly correct and even well written] +You have not completed the student training. Please complete the student training. If you have already gone through it, be sure to click the button at the end to record that you finished it. +Actually, I take that back. Is there such thing as implicit strong atheism? If not, the first sentence you suggested was great, Brian. +YOU ARE A F-ING DOOSH BAG/COK SUCKER/DICK FACE/HOMO/ASSWIPE/SUCK MY BALLS+DICK +Whoops I see i didnt log on. Thanks for your help anyway, I have been vandalized before. +":: actually you cannot call Beijing, 'Peking' anymore. the standardized is quite common in Asia, Korea is demand it's capital to be rename in several languages too. what you just said is a very imperialistic view of the world, if it can be correct, it should be corrected, your excuse is insanely stupid. the ""chinese"" never had a word that sound anything like ""chinese"" it is obviously made up by imperialist and should be removed. 218.186.12.224 " +" Sjones23, yes, I agree, specifically english wikipedia have differences, in the moments quite critical and sharp differences with other language wikis. So, yes, I will need time to get into the way, or how to say... to learn these differences, shorter saying. But that doesn't means that I'm wrong now in this specifical question. And I don't wanted to offend or hurt somebody feelings. If so I'm sincererely apologize. I just wanted to investigate. And make improvements of english wiki. ... But I must say, that you, Sjones23, is quite double-faced, you change your opinions often. You sating and agreeing that plot of ""PM"" is complicated and complex and after one day you saying that it is not so. You should not do this. Or this means can't to come to an agreement. You said:""Let's hope there are no more edit wars based on misunderstandings."" But if you will go from one side to another... I hope you understand. So I just kind advice to watch and keep your words. And don't forget what admin Bbb23 said to you:""I strongly urge Sjones to stay away from the article for a while to prove his good faith"". I believe that you are respected editor, but everyone can make mistakes and so on. Rules, guidelines, etc, are only one side of a coin. Well, I hope we understand ech other. Again I'm saying I don't want to offend somebody, just saying my sincere vision and opinion. Maybe some roughness... TheFarix, really I didn't undersand totally. You mean that there is fixed order in categories? I read that rule, but didn't understand it completely. Will be glad if you can explain. Thanks. Sjones23, about your sand-box version of plot. I must say that I don't like it and reasons I telled earlier. Look, you write, for example:""After Ashitaka returns the head to the deer god, the land becomes green again, and the accursed and lepers are restored to health. San and Ashitaka part, vowing to see each other as much as possible, while Ashitaka, finally freed of his curse, decides to rebuild Tataraba. Eboshi vows to rebuild Tataraba along more harmonious lines,..."" - what I see there it's completely muddle, misinterpret, lie. This is rough OR and distortion of what we really see in the film. I hope you will understand. And much places in your sand-box version like this example. So I disagree, must decline your version. Reread please what I wrote to Elen about different variants (point two). Thank you and again sorry all comrades for my not perfect english, must hurry just now, don't have much time to sit with dictionary and correct all mistakes. You can correct me if you want. Best wishes. " +" Well gee, I can eother take a common sense view that asking for someone's input is perfectly reasonable and ok, or i can accept your claim that to do so would be in breach of all manner of wikipedia rules. Which view do you think i will go with, ? " +True, but did you read the sentence before this? ackoz +" ""By78 is not doing because something need to be clarified, but it's deliberate. All links with detailed explanation exists but still act like a dumb person. This is deliberate. And why did you admin revert this edit"". This is what I asked. The word dumb there never means he is dumb you read it wrongly by saying I had called him dumb. Read it again, I said he is acting like a dumb person. The meaning of it is he is really smart and wants his version to stay and he is deliberately doing it. Also I request you to look at his edits. It also has a racist angle. Now don't come to me and say you called him a racist. Better you check his edits. He is showing signs of dislike for a particular race, otherwise one will not try deliberately attempt to tarnish the image of one race. It's not part of ordinary edits because we don't find it with anyother countries. Like when I edit Wikipedia, my subject is military matters and I do contribute to all articles and don't pinpoint something and inject negative views only about a particular race or country in the articles. " +Invite to Somerset wikiproject Thanks for your comments on my talk page - you don't have to live in Somerset to join the wikiproject.— talk +" First of all, thanks for adding the link. As for the ""notes,"" those are things I just happened to notice while listening to the tracks. I wish I could say I had an official source for them, but that's all I've got, though anybody who has the soundtrack and the other scores can verify what's in the article. " +" Fascinating source to work into article.'''''' • hasspoken " +You said no such thing and obviously want to continue this poo fest. Gee, who was the agressor here? And you know what, you reverting my reverts makes you a reverter too. I am a regular contributor to this DOH entry; you are the jane come lately swooping in with your agenda. Everybody is happy with the entry; now we can all drop it. +You Suck! Leave the GNAA article alone. 70.48.94.182 +F . U . C . K . Y . O . U +Snowded, what leads you to believe that thx outline presented above looks like an essay rather than a good wikipedia article? Do you have an good article or featured articles on similar topics? Are there any good articles on approaches to communication or psychotherapy that are well presented in your eyes? -ab you give any suggestions about his to improve it? Are there any missing bits? -192.148.117.101 +" Edit summaries Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. —talk " +''' 01:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC +Daniel RIGAL, FEEL FREE TO SUCK MY BALLS! +You seem to be in denial about if CRASS's actions meet the definition of vandalism. I think it would be healthy for you if you would explain how spray painting political slogan's in a subway satation is not willful defacement of public property. +Michael Jackson wikiproject Hi, a few people are getting together to start up a Michael Jackson wikiproject, and I thought maybe you'd like to join as well. If you wish to join, please tell me, and go here, then sign up under the participants section. There needs to be as much support as possible. Thanks. By the way, have you heard that MJ's releasing a new album? +I could never get past the cement on the second level. Anyone know how? +Dear Todd, Thanks. I will do that. +I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. +TBone? Dear sir, You are a bitch. I will take a shit on your car. I hope you realize that I own the rights to the entire DC universe and plan to poop on them as soon as I eat out your Granny. Dicks are for chicks, and your not one. Go get T-Boned by some burly man named Dirk. I think jodie foster is a sex beast and she rapes the souls from men ages 18-24. I also would like to bring to your attention that you sir are a wiitard. you make Clark fights his homosexual urges and wants to do Sylvester Stallone. I Want to ride the Italian stallion is what he says +" You put more ""fact, dubious, who"" tags in the Virgin birth (mythology) article. But that is material that you merged into this article and there are no such tags here. Why? " +I am a WHITE nationalist. I was banned because I lost my temper when other editors insisted on preventing me from removing anti-white nationalism bias from an article. Wikipedia is a JEW dominated site. +" My request to Dennis was in response to LI's request to me. I completely understand Li wanting to be included in a formal manner to acknowledge his continued efforts on behalf of the project. Honestly, most of the coordinators don't do anything, not even the basics. I agree that the whole coordinator business should be reviewed during the renovation. You both partially know my real life history. I've been blue no-collar and I've been management White collar. Sometimes the workers like to be acknowledged and included in the decisions that the managers (coordinators for our purposes) make. I think Li would just like an up-grade in his pay scale. Rather than wear the yellow worker hard hat he would like to try on the white supervisors hard hat. Maybe you could consider that as the upcoming changes are pondered. Not many have stepped out of the ranks to do the work of the project. When someone does and is efficient and reliable, its a bonus...for all of us. It expands the substance of what you started years ago. I know Li has this page on his watchlist. . Talk " +I added link to a sampling of gilliam's output as an environmental editorialist. Removed the cut and paste from Kevin Danaher, though the article he was interested in is represented in first external link. +Premiership winning captain I am following Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section), The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic. Being premiership captain is important to his career, I do have Australian rules footballer after it so I do not know what is the problem? You need to start to editing this article, it needs to be bigger do not make this a big deal, there are bigger issue than this. Please edit the article, thank you. +Location of Nawab Faizunnesa Government Girls’ High School - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Location_of_school.jpg Some of our students after getting results - File:Our_Students.jpg +Thank you, TFOW. In addition to that matter, I would also be grateful if you would look at the related matter of Talk:Omega_Point_(Tipler)#Disruptive_and_biased_editing_by_LuckyLouie. +" Arbcomm suffrage You've picked the wrong place to ask that question, as I don't make the rules. I just try to make sure both sides follow whatever rules have been agreed upon. The undeniable fact is that people will try to cheat by using multiple accounts, and the rules exist to reduce this, although it can never be fully prevented. No personal offense should be taken. Regards. — '''' ([ TALK]) 20:05, Jan. 10, 2006" +OneClickArchiver Hi! I was just using OCA to archive some stuff on WP:ANI and WP:AN. When I went to archive a section on WP:AN, it proceeded to create a new page rather than archiving to the most recent existing one. I've pinged you on WP:AN. The script looked for Archive 1, note the space, instead of finding Archive271. Would you mind having a look into the script and see what might be causing this? Regards. +grammatical errors to be corrected Early radio career Mills began his career at 16 as a DJ on his local Hampshire commercial radio station, Power FM, after barraging the station with demo tapes. He was given the chance to present a weeks worth of shows, and based on the success of this, was immediately offered the 'graveyard slot' of 1:00 am – 6:00 am six nights a week, making him the youngest permanent presenter on mainstream commercial radio. His popularity led to a quick move to the coveted late afternoon 'drive time'. Mills moved from Power FM on to GWR FM and stayed with the station for two years. His next station was Piccadilly Key 103 in Manchester where he once more progressed quickly from the late night slot to the mid-morning position. In 1995, Mills moved to the then new London radio station of Heart 106.2. Mills has provided various voiceovers, including the voice of specialist in-store radio station 'Homebase FM', the voiceover for Blockbuster Inc.'s in-store infomercial channel 'Blockbuster TV', and more recently, the voiceover for 'The VH1 Album Chart' on UK television channel VH1. BBC Radio 1 Mills joined BBC Radio 1 in 1998 to present The Early Breakfast Show between the hours of 4am and 7am. In January 2004, Mills was moved to a weekend afternoon slot, which only lasted for just over 6 months, as in July 2004 he moved over to the weekday early-evening slot, initially covering Sara Cox who was on maternity leave. When Sarah did not return to the slot, Scott took it over as his own The Scott Mills Show. Mills also provides holiday cover for other slots including The Chris Moyles Show. The Scott Mills Show, in its current format, runs from 4pm to 7pm, Monday to Friday. It is co-presented by sports reporter and occasional presenter Mark Chapman (Chappers). The assistant producer was Laura Sayers until April 2008. The current assistant producer is Rebecca Huxtable, usually called 'Beccy' or 'Wacky Beccy' on air. The regular newsreader is Tulip Mazumdar. The producer of the show is Emlyn Dodd, although he is referred to on air as 'The one who doesn't speak'. end of edit. +Template:Men's Professional Golf Tours I think I have the 1st, 2nd and 3rd tier tours down. I don't know what to do with the tours placed in the Other Tours section. Wondering if you knew, I can't find any information on tour rankings. Thanks. Template:Men's Professional Golf Tours +":::I came here looking for some information and I still thinks it reads like a fan site. Not just the sources but even the beginning with references to ""MJ"" (I have never seen that as a common nickname outside of fan sites) and headlines where information needs to be condensed as much as possible. For example, the MJ reference does not use ""MJ"" anywhere in the article. I am not a ""Hater"" but I do use SP:NPOV and I don't feel this article meets that criteria. talk Contributions " +" Talkback Just some comments about him and the block. (✉ • ✎) " +Switzerland is Western European, not Central European! LOL! John Calvin's society were all Western Europeans. How is Suisse distant from France? +Translation help needed Hi Jondel! Could you help me figure out the Japanese name for Pacific krill? I've found this Japanese site, from which I have made some educated guesses. However, as I do not know any Japanese at all, it would be really good if you could correct my blundering around at Pacific krill... Thanks! 09:38, July 14, 2005 (UTC) +FYI Hi Durova, Wasn't sure if you'd noticed this or not. Best, +Still avoiding the question... - why are you here? What is your obsession with the BNP (a nationalist party) when your own political views are the polar opposite (far left anti-monarchist socialist)? You are only here to smear or make the BNP look bad, hence your removal of local election results on the BNP when they had 2 recent councillors elected. Upsets you the BNP is doing well and winning seats does it? +Better still, write some articles about those events which meet our notability guidelines that you have mentioned. That'd be awesome. +Yes, I keep track of Afghanistani politics and I've never heard here speak Pashto and I don't know anyone that has ever heard her speak Pashto. I sometimes watch the parliament session on satellite TV where Pashto-speakers speak Pashto, but I have never heard her speak Pashto. +None of these people should have wikipedia pages None of them are notable. A single source from a newspaper makes ou notable? Than everyone who ever has a comment or article about them in a newsaper should have an article. rite? None of these people are celebrities or notable people. I have never said 'Ya know what I need to know about cric croker and brookers who are nobodies'. This whole section should be deleted. Someone message me about how I can nominate them for deletion please. 214.13.192.187 +ha ha, little racist protector can't deal with being called on his lies, what a surprise, same old racist bullshit +And the first one said to ther second one - I hope you are having fun ... ohohho, yes +I'm trying to understand you. If I knew which implausible claims you were referring to, I wouldn't ask. Are you referring to claims that the article causes him distress? +" Ah ok, I get what you mean. The last genus I was working on had a similar situation; particularly distinct groups of species got their sub-genera and everything else was crammed together higgledy-piggledy. Eventually they'll be no more new species being discovered and this job will be a lot easier. I'm a political science student, and this is similar to politics; everyone has their different view of what is/isn't appropriate classification, and it is unlikely to ever be settled. You have 4 studies claiming that X is a species, 3 later revisions claiming X is a subspecies of Y, genetic tests proving X is distinct from Y and then occular patterns and physical appearance showing X is related to Y. It goes on and on. lds " +" The issue of trivia sections are dealt with at the guidelines TRIVIA. Basically, such sections are unencyclopedic and trivial, and as an article develops, any relevant ""in pop culture"" material should be incorporated into the main body of the article. This article has seen a lot of attention from various editors, so some of the pop culture material has been incorporated into the ""legacy"" section or elsewhere, while some of it has been removed as unimportant or unverified. t/c " +It is looking much better, now - good job, dab! | Talk +ipv6 mIRC doesn't natively supports ipv6 protocols. It could be enabled by adding a external DLL plugin who will enable a special protocol for DNS and connecting to ipv6 servers. +Osteosarcoma Risk I have edited the statement regarding the association between neutering and osteosarcoma (OSA) because it was far stronger than the citation, or the literature in general, supports. In a single study of a single breed with a known risk for osteosarcoma far higher than most other breeds, the data showed the total lifetime exposure to sex hormones was negatively correlated with the incidence of OSA. The incidence of the disease was not statistically different between neutered and intact animals overall, though it was different between animals neutered at less than 1 year of age and intact animals. And there is no reason to suggest these findings would support a general relationship between neutering and OSA incidence in other breeds or mixed-breed dogs. Given the questionable clinical significance of the finding (intact animals actually died slightly, though not significantly, earlier than neutered animals overall) and the much more thoroughly demonstrated protective benefits of neutering on life expectancy and other kinds of cancer, I do not find this study sufficient to support a general assertion that OSA risk is a meaningful disadvantage of neutering. Brennen McKenzie, MA, VMD +I am very disappointed at your addition of Dong Cheng. Your addition itself is good, however, as you did add and correct Dong Cheng, we have lost a good opportunity to check the abilities and knowledges about Dong Cheng of Benjitheijneb. Now I am very surprised by the fact that Zhu Zhi was now created by Benjitheijneb. We could not find Zhu Zhi at List of people of the Three Kingdoms, However Dong Cheng page contains his name. I am waiting the day Benjitheijneb makes Zhu Zhi. It seems that he transfered the reposibility of creating the Zhu Zhi to others. ( ) Please DO NOT remove Zhu Zhi in Dong Cheng page and let's see how Benjitheijneb creat Zhu Zhi. Probably a Hewbrew translation of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms or Records of the Three Kingdoms contains Zhu Zhi. ( ) +" I will definitely comment if you can be as kind to comment mine? Best, talk to me " +" suggestions for corrections Hi, I'm not a native english speaker, so I hesitate to edit some mistakes myself: Whether the sarcophagus was ever intended to house a body is unknown. It is too short to accommodate a medium height individual without the bending of the knees, a technique not practiced in Egyptian burial, and no lid was ever found. I never heard about the sarcophagus being too short, this is certainly not generally accepted knowledge. Also, there are many other presumed items missing, such as the portcullis blocks (alleged remnants are left), some kind of slide connecting gallery and ascending passage, entrance blocks and the entire floor of the queens chamber. Keep in mind that the pyramid was open for centuries with no guards whatsoever-only immovable or almost immovable structures remained until the first attempts to a professional description of the interior more than 3000 years after construction. Egyptologists suggest the chamber was intended to be the original burial chamber, but that King Khufu later changed his mind and wanted it to be higher up in the pyramid. The 'change in plans'-theory has been suggested by some, but AFAIK is rejected by contemporary egyptologists such as Lehner and Stadelmann. Instead, they suggest an intended unfinishedness for religious purposes. The Greeks believed that slave labour was used but modern Egyptologists accept that it was built by many tens of thousands of skilled workers. Not ""the Greeks"", but Herodot writes about slaves, a myth which seem to be ineradicable. He visited the pyramids 2000 years after the construction and beside naming the builders correctly, had not much of a clue about anything else. The Great Pyramid is the only pyramid known to contain both ascending and descending passages. I'd say the satellite pyramid of the bent pyramid counts, too. It has a remarkable similarity to the great gallery as well. Minor point, I know. The National Geographic Society filmed the drilling of a small hole in the southern door, only to find another larger door behind it. I know Hawass said that during the show, but no other egyptologist believes that. Look at the images yourself. There have been no further attempts made to ""open"" the alleged door. I'd say, don't call it a second door until proven otherwise. The shafts seem to end in this tiny room-a very similar structure can be found in the southern upper shafts as well, by the way. Joyce Tyldesley states that the Great Pyramid itself ""is known to have been opened and emptied by the Middle Kingdom"" I wonder where Mr. Tyldesley got that information from. I am not aware of any ancient source regarding the opening of the pyramid. While I believe it has happened, and during the first intermediate period, there is nothing but vague hints in old egyptian sources-I think the term ""known"" is exaggerated. Herodot and Diodor claim to have been inside-that points to the pyramid being open around 450 bc, but at which point the opening happened remains uncertain. Hope this is helpful! 213.39.133.27 " +Heavier Than Heaven upcoming movie I think that we should add some info in the Books and Films on Cobain section about his upcoming bio film. +A tag has been placed on Eric D. Williams, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +Edit - There seems to be some confusion over whether perspicacite targetted one of my other articles for deletion, or if it was another user Zntrip. Although Zntrip made the AFD request,, he did it in unison with perspicacite. Zntrip however eventually withdrew his request for deletion and told perspicacite that he would not longer work with him. See this comment by Zntrip. . That's how invidious his cyber-bullying is. He actually teamed up with someone to do it. +You don't to talk about what they've done ?''' +supper, you hungry bitch +Category:1803 disestablishments in Germany :Category:1803 disestablishments in Germany, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. +" Uuhhh, no he didn't. Bolt's previous record was 9.69. Gay ""only"" managed 9.71. White cat " +" Civility I find your comments here to be hostile in nature. I think that you'll agree that if you are trying to bring a new editor up-to-speed, then it would be better to be a good example of civility rather than giving me a ""you don't like it, well that's too bad"" approach. Thanks. discuss " +WHY DID YOU DELETE THE ARTICLE ON ABBAS RIZVI??? ABBAS RIZVI IS A WELL KNOWN PAKISTANI AUTHOR AND POET!!!!!!!! I UPDATED THAT ARTICLE WITH RELEVANT INFORMATION AND BOOK TITLES!!!!!!!!!!!!! PUT THE ARTICLE BACK ASAP. +" Radio Commentary? This line seems inappropriate and biased: ""The divorced father of a son, Cole, and a daughter, Hayley, Fuhrman is a frequent guest of conservative commentator Sean Hannity for FOX News."" Why does he need to be described as a divorced father of a son and daughter under the radio commentary section? Also he's a guest on Hannity and Colmes which has a conservative and a liberal on it. I'm waiting for the day when wikipedia describes public figures as ""liberal"" as often as they liberally apply the ""conservative"" label. Pardon the pun. " +A turd for you! For all your hard work. Found this in the toilet, so I picked it out and immediently thought of you. So here you go ) +Merge nasal douche to this here I suggest we merge Nasal douche to here because it is the same thing! 96.244.254.20 +Oteti == Otu (ocu, i want) and Netu (Necu, I dont want), does anyone know anything about these words? I hear they are used by Montenegrins in Berane. == +Thanks for deleting my article Talk page I couldn't reply to your message on my User_talk page because it's still protected. That's okay, it can stay protected. Thanks for deleting the article Talk pages. About your question, why not do both? The redirect (which I don't like but that's a battle for another day) goes to PIR, but keep PIR just a tiny little stub that says it sponsors the following websites. Then link to the Wikipedia article for each site. The CIA cookie thing is so trivial, that it can be mentioned in a NameBase article (there's a page about it at http://www.namebase.org/ciascan.html ), or just skipped altogether. Or you could add our www.cia-on-campus.org website (didn't know we had that one, did you?) and mention the cookie thing there. Or add a sentence about Google's cookies, and stick the CIA sentence right next to it in the Google-Watch article. By having these other articles, you can justify keeping PIR just a tiny little stub. This approach is reasonable because the whois info for all my websites shows that the domain registration is technically owned by PIR. Brandt doesn't own the websites, PIR does! I think Wikipedia-Watch should probably be skipped or mentioned in Criticism of Wikipedia, but that's not for me to say. +Naughty naughty u slimy little greaseball. Haha lol u got banned what a dickhead it's what u deserve u fuckin geek bitch-faced motherfucker. You don't know how long I've been waitin for u to get banned and no wonder theres so many imposters of u cause every1 hates u! I hope you get the shit kicked out of you and then get pissed on you fuckin no good slimy little toerag gimp! SCUMMER! +Good luck stopping your amalgams, mixing up and mingling. +No problem, I do understand. I'll likely make a cleanup attempt soon, as I think some condensing is necessary to improve the article's flow and balance. Just wanted to ask you first before I take the plunge. Keep watching, OK? +" HELLO! I am the one who keeps insisting on making the ""God Damn"" entry. My entry has become long winded based on your (both of yours, actually) insistance that my entry is non-factual. I have cited a dictionary entry based solely on your statement that the word ""damn"" does not mean ""to be condemned by God,"" when, in fact it does. As an atheist, you can rest assured that I am not offended by this phrase. Who the fuck are you to determine that because you can't figure out the definition of a word when it is provided to you, that my entry is incorrect? The fact that you retracted or edited my entry 3 times does not make it incorrect. It means that you have been an idiot 3 times. YOU are the one guilty of vandalizing my entry by removing it without a valid reason. The fact that you have relatives that do not like the term God Damn for religious reasons is not relevent to this topic, and your argument concerning the entymology is fallacious. Does any ever say ""Steve Damn"" or ""That stupid fuck SMcCandlish Damn""? No, they do not, beacuse to the followers of modern mythology (i.e. Christianity), the only thing capable of damning is God, hence the phrase ""God damn"" is redundant." +" quote Proved"" in this case is only appropriate for mathematics or logics. This is a psychology/epistemology-related claim. And, no, it's not a matter of ""agreeing"" or ""disagreeing"" with it!) I will answear to this.If you use logic in a discussion who seems to be philosophical more than mathematical , you use the same ""mathematical implication"".It's not a claim , it's a proof.A Ph D proof in a scientific domain (theoretical informatics) not a philosophical discussion.Read the text. " +Please do not delete this page, i think it is starting to come along. It is a pretty good article so far. Just give us a little time to work on it. +Adam Biafore There is a lot on him in the book [2Pac Lives The Death of Makaveli / The Resurrection of Tupac Amaru (Volume 1)]]. Also I once read something else on him in another book about cults. Why is their no article on him on Wikipedia? +Many thanks, discussion started at Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Brad Evans. Snowman +WikiProject Lacrosse Hello I dont know is it, I've noticed you have taken a shine to making lacrosse player articles. I would like to invite you to join WikiProject Lacrosse, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the sport of lacrosse. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. +Thanks! That really helped a lot. +Nope, nothing there on official casualties for either side, next? This article does not cover the basics. I agree that it should be completely deleted and rewritten with the actual facts of the invasion, the surrounding problems that caused the invasion can be in sub articles. +Rollback Hello PSUMark2006, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. +Contested deletion This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... I am new at posting to Wikipedia and working as quickly as possible to resolve the issues with this page. Thank you. +I meant to continue discussing the statement that you quoted from the article. I don't think that that statement was meant to refer to recombination on the molecular level but rather to the creation of new combinations of whole genes. I would like to note that genetic drift was thought of long before there was any understanding of the molecular basis of genetics. They knew the genes were in the chromosomes and that they could be reshuffled by crossover, exchanging parts of chromosomes. If crossover recombination had created a new gene, I think they would have registered that as mutation. That is the mindset in which I think this statement should be interpreted. I think I now can answer your first question. The answer is: None. +To answer your question: I have only just checked the thread on the ref desk, and I see that you struck the part that is defamatory. Therefore, I have also struck the part of my comment that constitutes a legal threat. Just so you know, I live in America, where the time is several hours behind that in Great Britain, and right now I also work the graveyard shift at the refinery and go to sleep right after I get back home so when someone living in Great Britain makes any request of me (to strike an offensive/counterfactual comment, etc.), it can take me up to 24 hours to respond. Please let me know whether you consider this dispute resolved. 67.169.177.176 +" Alrighty, I'm posting the evidence below for everybody to see. I initially noticed , who had a disruptive username. His first action within 60 seconds of creating his account was to create a userpage consisting solely of ""heil masem"", an attack on . Since his later edits, including signing up for the WikiCup with the al-Qaeda flag, demonstrated that he was here to troll, I blocked him indefinitely. Enter , who, within two minutes of creating his account, is able to perform an intricate template time update on a nomination by . Note the interest in Wikipedia:Featured pictures shared by all three accounts. Nick then posts to Masem's talkpage, linking this vandalized version of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wagner and identifying Pirated as a sock of Wagner. In that vandalized revision, note that the vandalism included references to Montenegro. Pirated, after being reverted for attempting to use the al-Qaeda flag, requested to use the Podgorica flag. Podgorica is the capital of Montenegro. At this point, H.W.C. complained that I am ""blocking users with little evidence and expecting people to clean up the rest after him again"" (emphasis mine). Note the use of ""again"", when I have never interacted with him under that account before. Additionally, note that H.W.C. created his account and immediately started making featured picture nominations centering around video games. Wagner has occasionally talked about being a video gamer to his own socks. Additionally, H.W.C. signed up for the WikiCup with a Montenegro flag, which he later changed to the Podgorica flag. He clones 's userbox and adds another of Mason's userboxes to his userpage. Mason Doering is a known sock of Wagner. Nick's modifications to the template were on a nomination created by H.W.C. On Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Poolside 03.jpg, H.W.C. showed up in twenty minutes to comment on Pirated's nomination. H.W.C., Mason Doering, and Pirated use similar edit summary styles. Finally, checkuser identified that H.W.C. also had the account . Thanks. " +":::::Unaware of further talk page discussion, I reverted William F. Connolly. However, even after reading the discussion it seems reasonable to me. Other than the CNN source, they seem to be OK. Furthermore, I certainly have to agree with Binsternet's statement, ""Let's not see the goalposts repositioned afterward, making my effort for naught."" Again and again on this talk page we have heard from Rangoon that any disagreement with her opinion is just a waste of time. We all value our time and don't like to see it wasted. Hopefully we can all look to WP policy which dictates that the lead give a summary of the article. " +" Also, I note that you struck yourself as a party in the response. Any insight as to why? Thanks in advance. ^[omg plz] " +Featured article status Heya, I came across your profile and saw the bit that part of your contributions involve working on articles up to featured article status. Is the 2006 state election important enough to be considered for featured article status, and if so, what improvements do you reckon it might need to be up to scratch, quality wise? Thanks for your time, much appreciated. +Your revision There are editors like mezzo mezzo who are continuously disallowing editing Salafi,Wahabi ,Ahle Hadees pages to other editors according to their personal hidden agenda.I tried with verifiable sources to put its relation with Terrorism and am also discussing it with editors but mezzo mezzo just prevented me and others on the baseless pretext of one or other. +Big Wang Sometimes, I prefer to insert a phallus into my rectum. Do you think we could do this together? -Wangbot 1.2 +" The entire wikipedia entry is the result of a misunderstanding. Hypermarket is the French term for ""supermarket,"" nothing more, nothing less. The caretakers of this page evidently want to create a new English commercial term. Wikipedia is not the place to do that. Take it over to wiktionary.org. Nominate entry for speedy removal. " +wow its obvious koreans cannot make a single edit without cursing +=You worthless piece of shit As a concerned citizen I am upset and violated that you would do this. You are wortheless - how can you take pleasure in hurting Miami this way? If I ever see you in your life I will make it a point to kill you on site. You worthless ridiculous bastard I hate your fucking guts I hope you burn in hell and die most painfully. Yours truly, PP loco +ACUMAN IS A PHONEY GO READ THE TALK PAGES. THIS GUY IS FULL OF IT. +Cumulus cloud, you should respond of your disruptive and genuinely anal retentive action. Do you know a cumulus of what you are pouring on wikipedia? +WP:ANI Hi, please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ohconfucius as I have had to mention you in my outline. Thanks. +Blocked This IP address has been blocked for 48 hours for repeated blatant vandalism despite warnings. +Article I can't remember my password as Jim Bakken so now I'm fieldgoalunit. I should have included Tyldesley. I have completed Worcs. In time I'll summarise test cricket. I do not have time to study the protocols in detail I'm afraid but in fact apart from typos only the links need fixing and I would be grateful if someone would do it. Too many cricket articles have inaccuracies or rambling tales attached to them - The Bob Taylor one was the worst - wrong match for his highest score, wrong series, not night watchman and story about it therefore nonsense. Also he never challenged Knott for his place. +There not negitive, their factual. They do not infringe on painting Cicero in a bad light. +" , making it possible for their now pointy little heads to fit into the small, ceremonial cap of an arbitrator. It is rumored hat some arbs may be affectionately referred to as ""coneheads"" or ""pinheads"" behind closed doors.]]" +The game is also available as part of the Star Wars: Best of PC Collection, which, though it's no longer in production, is still available. My wife bought it for me just a few months ago on Amazon.com. +Ha ha! It is weird indeed. I don't know why I wrote that. +" When you fagots decide to edit wikipedia is it a tough call between editing and tattooing the word ""loser"" on your forehead? Tattoo might have been less embarrassing. Later asslickers. 109.123.123.36 " +" Betacommand As one of the admins who blocked Betacommand/Delta in the 12 month period leading up to the present ArbCom case, it would be helpful if you could look over the questions here and see how much information you can recall. ''' ✔Tea time''' " +give Chaser give the dude named chaser a gold start he helped me out +Heymid, what happened to your intention to only discuss things and write messages that are useful? It appears that since you were unblocked, your contributions to actual articles haven't been nearly as many as your edits in talk pages and pages in the Wikipedia namespace. Do you forget your promises as soon as you are unblocked? And if so, why should anyone care about what you promise the next time you are trying to get unblocked? - +A warning would be fair. +. I've also finished an article on Anna of Denmark (1532–1585) +Can I changed the red in the photo with the red that I think it is better? 14:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC +" Thanks. The problem is that BLOAT is the problem. Stuff needs to be removed. But in accordance with Wikipedia policy, not according to ""I like the conclusions of this source, I don't like the conclusions of this source"". Saying ""just add"" then compounds the problem. However, the suggestion to have a separate article on Inequality and economic growth might be a good one. " +Awards and Nominations Is the awards and nominations too long to the point it needs it's own article or is it fine the way it is? +REDIRECT Talk:1812 Louisiana hurricane +" OK: Since I assume you are a Swede, why didn't you start off at the Swedish Wikipedia? You live (and are born) in Gothenburg, right? So your ""main"" team is Frölunda HC? Mid (contributions) Heymid, what happened to your intention to only discuss things and write messages that are useful? It appears that since you were unblocked, your contributions to actual articles haven't been nearly as many as your edits in talk pages and pages in the Wikipedia namespace. Do you forget your promises as soon as you are unblocked? And if so, why should anyone care about what you promise the next time you are trying to get unblocked? - " +" Photo Prehaps a nicer picture? http://www.politics.co.uk/photo/nigel-farage-mep-$4001137$300.jpg ? I also find this photograph a bit strange. 87.126.5.147 New Photograph Added I have found the perfect image. Is it suitable? ( ) No, we can't use non-free images of living people, see WP:NFC#UUI. (talk) " +OK. Unblock (new request) +Yeah, sorry about that. I just feel like the genres on certain pages are always wrong, that's y I always change them. +" A straw poll will help us know what kind of page length and content are most desired by the most Wikipedia editors. The last straw poll, open for a single day, produced a deadlock and we want to move forward with the version of the article that most people would want. Simple and easy - just ask people to come have a look. '''talk " +" New Fake ""CryptoLocker"" circulating on the Internet A few days ago, in the institution where my wife works they catch it with CryptoLocker-like virus that in all external signs resembles normal CryptoLocker virus. I asked her to send me several ""encrypted"" files together with their unencrypted copies to analyze them and the first thing I noticed was the difference in their size. The ""encrypted"" files are smaller than the originals - something that will not happen when encoding with RSA, especially ""2048-RSA"" as in the message for ransom claimed. This ""CryptoLocker"" simply use some sort of data compression like in RAR format. Does anyone have more information about this virus? " +DO NOT ERASE MY MESSAGES - This behaviour is infraction with the talk page guidelines as clearly described here Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments RESTORED MESSAGE -Thanks for your tips. I'll indeed take it to ANI and I've neutralized the title without completely changing the nature of the topic (which was the purpose of your action). Metropolitan (talk) +Fucking ban me motherfucker. Fucking Dutch cunt. +WP Trust Metrics Dear YourRD, what do you think of this ? (looking for initial feedback before any public debate) + 08:05, 2004 Apr 14 (UTC) +" Dear C.Fred, this is ridiculous. I'm just conveying a fact, and Wikipedia is blocking me as soon as I do. I'm like the boy that states the fact that the emperor is naked, and you're among the public that tells him to be quiet. Can you please tell me what I possibly can write about clades and cladistics that will not block me? Anything that isn't right on the point? Cladistic is is in fact a mental desease. Is it possible to say that a mental desease is a mental desease? At the same time as Object-Oriented modeling is making great progress in geographical information systems (like you can see on CNN almost every night illustrating statistics for US and parts of it) and in a multitude of other applications, the inconsistent, self-contradictory and empirically erroneous cladism holds its fort against it by oppression of its opponents (for example blocking me). I have supported my statements with facts, and none of the influential cladists even dare to challenge them. Gareth Nelson tried every night for at least five months without success. The fact that he even tried is a measure of the importance he assesses them. In this continuing blocking of me, Wikipedia at least has to set a time limit as to when it regards the facts I'm stating (i.e., that time is relative) as being generally accepted (among cladists?). This discussion is totally and utterly ridiculous. Cladism does in fact deny that time can be relative, instead claiming that it is relations that are are relative, that is, that relative is relative. How long do we have to continue discussing a paranoia? Why not just conclude that it is a paranoia? Cladists don't understand that it is they that conceptualize reality, but instead think they find concepts. They think things have conceptual labels all around them, that they are branded. It is ridiculous, ridiculous... I thus contest being blocked for telling the truth. I argue that if telling the truth in itself is a reason for being blocked, then Wikipedia can certainly not be allocated to the category 'encyclopedia', since the definition of this concept surely must include telling the truth (to the best of its ability). If Wikipedia contest this argument, then I demand a specification of which part(s) of it. (I, however, have no illusions. I expect this contest to lead to my blocking from this page too. I expect to be blocked everytime I tell the truth. It doesn't stop me. I will continue telling the truth until it penetrates cladists foggy brains, or at least diagnoses their foggy brains as the foggy brains they are. In the meantime, Wikipedia will have major problems trying to hinder their confusion to spread to phylogenetics, evolution, medicine and maybe even science itself. Cladism actually hates science in its traditional form, i.e., as described by Karl Popper, and is presently trying to roll out its confusional mat over it. Just read the ""explanation"" of phylogenetics and you have to understand what I mean. It is totally impossible to make ""heads and tails"" of. If it belongs in an encyclopedia, then I'm Santa, Cladism is not science, but rather a reaction against science). Consist (presently at 83.254.20.53 )" +Epigenetics has to be included- this is revolutionizing biology at present However, large cohort studies do not take into account the genetic and epigenetic variability of individuals within a population. In response to your statements above: I don't think this (personalized medicine) is silly- if we are after an excellent individual biological in toto care for anyone personalized medicine is the best approach.. what else? +" A cookie for you! Lel Mate1 " +See United States presidential election, 1864. The 17% went to Thomas H. Seymour. The political New York, Vermont and Connecticut Seymours seem to have been all related, but I suppose it's not easy to ascertain their exact relationship. +" What the heck ""likely"" or ""possibly"", i don't care ). Comanche cph " +Raykyogrou0: See, you are against all reason. That's why I move this to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. The warnings for that are on your Talk page! +" Well, that reversion took all of 9 minutes. And the stated reason: ""Considering your second ref contradicts your first one, ""straight fact"" seems an overstatement"" Reversion (and block!) by ""SarekOfVulcan"". I'd be very interested to know why my previous comment above was taken to be me making a personal attack. And I'd also be curious to know Wikipedia's policy on cyberbullying. SarekOfVulcan appears to support making threats to members of the community who are making good faith edits toward the improvement of this website. " +No, a personal grooming product. I see +You still demonstrate you have no understanding what a source is or Wikipedia's no original research credo. +" +1And might I say that perhaps Wikipedia might be better served with discussions like the one you Arbitrators had about that case being onwiki. Sure, Arbitrators might not have been so blunt, which would be unfortunate. However, I think think that if some of your comments had been public back in 2007, administrative culture might have been changed for the better. (Talk) " +No, the problem is jpgordon, who has clearly shown that he is unable to be impartial about SlimVirgin or Tony. I think it is he who should resign, his behavior towards John has been an utter disgrace. Tony has been intentionally baiting left and right, yet he accuses us of being in the wrong? I just love how he paints Tony as the victim when it is clear that Tony takes up at least %30 of the edits on those talk pages. Shame on him! If arbcom reform is to proceed, people like jpgordon must go! He's a disgrace to this project. John has contributed far more high-quality content then either SlimVirgin or Tony, who are here mostly to play political games, ever will. +Thanks! Hey thanks for the information. I'm new to the island and I appreciate it when the locals help me out. +Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. / +The band cites Trivium, Metallica, System of a Down, Pantera, Machine Head, Fear Factory and Kamelot as influences. Psycho states that his favorite guitarists that influence his own style are Corey Beaulieu, Kirk Hammett, Dave Mustaine, Robb Flynn and Andy LaRocque. Also, he states that Robb Flynn, Matt Heafy and Phil Anselmo have influences his vocal style. Obie cites Oliver Palotai of Kamelot as a favorite keyboardist. As influences on his vocal style he mentions Brandon Boyd of Incubus and Roy Khan of Kamelot. Rob cites Robert Trujillo of Metallica as an influence and Cioky names John Dolmayan of SOAD as a favorite drummer. Sethgar has named Daron Malakian, also of SOAD as a favorite guitarist. The band plays a blend of multiple genres of metal: metalcore, thrash metal, gothic metal, industrial metal and death metal, but they don't always put all the styles into a single song. They rather blend two or three of these styles into one song, making it difficult for their songs to be catalogued as a specific genre. Band members Psycho - Lead and Rythm guitars, growled vocals, rarely clean vocals Obie – Keyboards, clean vocals Sethgar – Acoustic Guitars Rob – Bass Cioky – Drums Former members Stinkman - Bass Maq - Rythm guitar G-Orgy - Drums Legolas - Drums Discography HORRORfying (2009 - single) Acheron (2009 - Not yet released) WIKIPEDIA SUCKS!! IT SHOULD BURN!! +" ROUX has claimed such examples are disqualified. I am only holding him to his own standard. Either they are in or out, they can't be out for me, but in for him. [tk] " +wtf? wtf is your problem? why are you being such an asswipe? This is an educational institution, you have no right to block an eductational institution. I will promise you legal action if that continues. Against you and against your family and against anyone you may have that loves you. I do not like you, and I hope you die soon. I will sue you if you continue to harass me. Your harassment is a violation of federal law and I warn you if you continue, you will not like the consequences. 216.229.227.144 +We all love Selena even though she was like brittany spears or madonna +You do more damage than the vandals. +WikiMath 101: 14 < 3. +There is another Hans Baur I was going to create an article for Hans Bauer (SS officer), 05.04.1945 SS-Obersturmführer Commander 3 Company, 506th SS Panzer Grenadier Battalion a recipient of teh Knight's Cross +HISTORY WILL ABSOLVE ME. +Instructor's Feedback It sounds like you have an interesting article to write. Focusing on each decade might be tricky though - there have been 9 decades since 1920, which is a lot to fill out in the upcoming 2 weeks. If you restructure the article you might be better able to cover key concepts and facts related to this topic. Also notice the connection to the Plus-size clothing article and see how you are going to settle possible conflict between the two pages. Perhaps it would be better to expand on the Plus-size clothing article? Good luck! +Well, if you still think that way , why dont you search the term on google and find it yourself that I am right 72.33.44.250 you wont do it because this will make you go back on your actions ,, you racist 72.33.44.250 +Your recent edits to my user page I am sure you will not mind that I write on my user page that the user page has been edited partly by you against my will? +low}} {{reqphoto|people of New York +that you are a homosexual who is very gay. +What is the name of the used CD store he owns? +should motivate you to look into the matter and take some action. But what I have found time and again is that many administrators are actually the problem. +I'm not going to pry open this can of worms (because I've got a life to live -), but I'll remind editors whenever they get it wrong because incorrect usage, especially really obvious errors like this, adds to the mickey-mouse feel of WP. +resources. A simply analogy, but I'm sure you get my point +A page you started has been reviewed! Thanks for creating Raktomukhi Neela, Rajdeep7! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: This article is mostly plot summary. Please find reviews or news articles about the book, and write who published it, how widely was it sold, was it hardcover, was it reprinted, what did the critics say, etc. Good luck with your editing. — To reply, leave a comment on Anne Delong's talk page. Learn more about page curation. +WHY DON/T YOU JUST GO FUCK YOURSELF ASSHOLE! +which is latin or greek or some shit for who will gaurd the guards or in this case who will block the blockers. +But now look what has happened. +Your submission at Articles for creation Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Sankichi Takahashi was created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. If you would to help us improve this process, please consider Thank you for helping Wikipedia! +queer wow ur so fucking gay u should go die +The Darker side of the Dance +That image was not copyrighted. +" This page contains Pants. Without proper pants support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Chinese characters. " +"I inserted ""what they consider"" and later ""suggestint"" because the lack of sources is not fact but the POV of the adherents of this fringe view. Lack means ""too few"" or even ""none"" and this is inaccurate, at least POV. " +So a third pornography industry advocate has joined this correspondence, which increases the number of participants but actually decreases its importance in my affairs, as well as the relevance of Wikipedia in important matters regarding the health of our society (it is lamentably our society... I only wish I could call it your society). But I may call Wikipedia your propaganda tool, since you are apparently the one who has been granted authority to tolerate certain comments which you interpret as being unbiased and to crassly delete other information which you interpret as being biased. If you really want to avoid bias, just casually investigate the history of your pornography supporting friend Horrorshow, who, not surprisingly, has been busy editing other articles that clearly promote the pornography industry. Wikipedia: a free speech tool for the people or a propaganda tool for a certain sector of the population which seeks to control people's opinions on matters that adversely affect their mental health? Quite a question to ponder. But my point on bias is that every author is biased. Just because Wikipedia can be edited by supposedly anybody (in theory it can be, but in reality it is clearly controlled by certain well-organized individuals who have made Wikipediaing their vocations), does not make Wikipedia an unbiased source of information. The author of this webpage, who clearly has an interest in displaying information that promotes the pornography industry in the United States, is biased. His or her comments on Lubben's religious views clearly betray that sentiment, as do the history of his or her activities on Wikipedia. And you don't need to tolerate anything from me any longer, because I will stop now... or maybe I won't, I guess it depends on just how much time I'm willing to waste communicating with you. This is becoming Dostoevskian, Underground Man... give it a read sometime... it might help you.Veritas, Semper . But you and I both know where the truth lies in this matter. There is no need for an arbitrator, who, again, would be mistakenly be labeled an unbiased third party. +Are you even an admin? - +The Rams are now gone from Skank Louis. What's the point of reverting back to the name of Skank Louis when the team has officially relocated to L.A. and have gotten the votes to move. Please, try to put it back to L.A., since it's our team now, not yours kid. 😂😂😂😂 +It is a book by a Britisher and books depicts writer's view and knowledge on the subject which cannot be taken as proof. The Fact is Ramdasias are weavers and Ravidasias are chamar. Every matrimonial website have different section for both. +, I get none as I am a gobshite. +You know Weiji, it's kind of funny being condescended to by you, and told to 'learn something', at the same time as being reminded to be polite. It's all the more odd since it seems doubtful that you've ever studied cognitive science or evolutionary genetics. Perhaps you feel you have the moral high ground. Maybe you should think about approaching this delicate subject neutrally and scientifically, rather than selecting 'reliable sources' which confirm your bias. Marks is a well known egalitarian apologist, with about as much credibility as Gould. My summary of his 'argument' is accurate (well perhaps I should have written general intelligence instead of IQ (quicker), but the point is clear). If you want I can break it down into words of one syllable. Is this one of the 'reliable sources' you keep admonishing us to use? +You are boring leave me alone +" Speedy deletion of Jamey ruitto A tag has been placed on Jamey ruitto, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. (talk•contribs) " +Very well, thanks for the clarification. +Regarding your threat to me: please stop deliberately misconstruing policy. I have studied it quite thoroughly after earlier disagreements I have had. I consider your threats to me to be incivil behavior. +Important people of the battle Brack Obama Santa Clause Easter Bunny Leprechaun Ron Gerardis Cupid Ronald Mcdonald Tooth Fairy +Of course I am sorry, I would not have reverted it otherwise. Time stamps show you increased the block at the same time as I reverted. I will also be appealing the block as it was not the second violation of an IBAN nor was it an infarction at all. +" I said it in my edit summary and I am going to repeat it here: All of these are ""Albanian parties"" otherwise they would not be taking part in ""Albanian elections"". So to call one party ""Greek"" and all the other parties ""Albanian"" is misguided and flat out wrong, not to mention original research WP:OR.  λόγοςπράξις " +No, now the article did not appear nuetral. +you should die from cancer. +" The description of a consensus view as ""by some"" is a incorrect. I notice that Noloop is back, and hope that he does not engage in endless conversations with other editors about how various fringe views have been wrongly cast as anti-semitism. " +{{caution|Jimbo Wales and Wikipedia staff are well known pedophiles +Taekwondo Vs. Karate Taekwondo is a very simular spot as to karate, but multiple differences +Lol Youre too incompetent to place a proper warning! Idiot! +" 3RR on Santorum It appears you've made more than three reverts to Rick Santorum in the past 24 hours. Please undo your last revert.     talk  I will never reinsert policy violating content to a en wikipedia article - if you feel I have violated any policies - feel free to take responsibility for the issue and add the disputed content yourself " +Bury the hatchet? FeloniousMonk has hardly pulled back from his criticism of me. There was no opportunity for us to put it behind us. Besides, he has been disruptive. As I said before, what do you call willfully ignoring WP:CITE and putting back uncited challenged material? What do you call deleting the RfC I put in response to that? +Barnstar Thank you very much for the Barnstar. It is sincerely appreciated! +" And I accidently revealed my true identity, so you can block both me and my IP address. Nevertheless, I hope the lesson is learned. This debate is political, not about information. I know this kind of ""tricks"" are formally forbidden, but there was no other way to prove to falasies in this debate. " +No, Mat's edits have always been of high quality. I think you will find them so if you check. +What Mojo hand really is Mojo hand is a complete chodna gimp. +Support Disambiguation pages exist to serve as navigational aids for the reader. There's no strong argument that this is not the primary topic, and it would be hard to prove it is not considering the other potential pages have not yet been considered worth creating. As it stands this is one of many articles where the reader is best served by being directed to the only acutal existing page they could be looking for. (let's chat) +" Thanks for this sanity reminder, Bogdan. I myself added the following template to the top of this Talk page just a few days ago: ""Remember that article talk pages are provided to coordinate the article's improvement, not for engaging in discussion for discussion's sake. Do not use them as a discussion forum."" What this means is that we can not censor MarkStreet or anyone else because of their opinions, or ask them to shut up. But we can (and should) ask everyone, including MarkStreet, to only comment on issues which are relevant to editing the main article: Edit suggestions, sources, etc. PS: I just archived the 300K-long Talk page, as Archive 7. I kept topics open where we still have some pending issues to take care of, in advance of the protection being lifted. - " +yes, yes, yes blocking an AOL user for daring to report vandalism by a registered user? yeah, I'm not sure if irony is the word you're thinking of +Please, do no not revert my edits on the Sugababes single' articles. I added missing sources! - +Ok that's fine I guess I'll just wait for the block to expire since it's only 24 hours. That said, by your logic it is reasonable to block every new account and/or IP that has not yet edited, since no productive edits will have been made. 91.108.250.247 +" Your streak of bad behaviour Is very obviously catching up with you, Rams Up Cock 2000. You are constantly having to update your ""TALK"" page as people continually post your mistakes, and point our your shortcomings. But does this stop you from being a complete tosh and still revert what you classify as ""vandalism"" ??? No, I don't think anything will work with you. I have reported your account for complete mis-use of vandal tools, and for harassment against me. You posted a ""warning"" on my page for ""vandalism"" but it wasn't reverted. That's a clear sign that it isn't vandalism. You target only the ""vandals"" you think will give up the fight. I am not one of those people. I made a legit edit and you kept messing around with it. MIND your own BUSINESS and do not edit my work unless you have a damn good reason to. you are an IMBECILE and a BUFFOON. keep trying, cause i'll revert your work EVERY TIME." +" Lol, but I don't know who can and who can't?! • Watch n' Learn " +23 January 2006 Your vandalism to the article 7 has been reverted. Please cease and desist for the benefit or the rest of Matoaca High School students who wish to edit in peace. Regards, +This is a very inaccurate and well poisoning characterization. I am biologist with a strong background in philosophy, mainly focused on ethics but of course broadly on metaphysics, epistemology and political philosophy as well. At this point in my life I've gone back to school specifically to get a degree in philosophy and no longer even work as a scientist, so for you to cast aspersions of scientism is wholly unfounded. I don't think Dawkins should be called a philosopher for two reasons: 1. He is not referred to as such in philosophical publications, at least not enough that it is justifiable to call him a philosopher outright per WP:V, and 2. He does not work within the traditions of any established academic disciplines of philosophy. That is, he does not attempt to deconstruct language so as to understand and analyze its meaning and to subsequently determine - through rigorous logic - the truth or falsity of propositions, as he would if he practiced analytical philosophy. Nor does he fit into the traditions - however broad - of continental philosophy. Granted, he does write about subjects that are within the pursue of philosophy, but he does not do so in a philosophical style. Now, I'll fully admit that the there is a sort of Demarcation problem here, and so my second point should only be considered an aside to the first point. On my first point, I'd be happy to include it in the article if Dawkins was characterized as a philosopher by a more than a couple mainstream, philosophical journals or by a substantial number of mainstream, academically practicing philosophers. +Image:IBM_mainframe.JPG listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IBM_mainframe.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +"New Age spiritual leader? == In the article about New Age it is written that The New Age movement is a Western spiritual movement that developed in the second half of the 20th century. Blavatsky passed away much earlier - in 1891, so it is not precise to categorize her in ""New Age spiritual leaders"". I suggest to move her into a new category - ""New Age precursors"" or ""New Age predecessors"", where Swedenborg, Vivekananda and others can also be placed. 174.3.242.51 Done. Other predecessors also included. == " +New Deal in the UK Announced yesterday - TNA are cancelling their contract with TWC and have reached a deal with another channel believed to be Bravo. +Ok cool , Im calm . I welcome other points of view and I am glad to see why people /editors either think it should be there or not. I put it back meanwhile esp. since its actually in the story of hardcore anyhow . Ok sorry about the sock puppet mentioning . In these cases for years . this behavior usually 93% has been a sock puppet. I will be back in a few hours or less and lets go to the talk page and or encourage others to show what they feel as well as maybe some sources. have a Great Day . I got a little aggravated after people for about 3 weeks now changing it when its in Fact, TRUE and there is a source , as well as its mentioned in the U.K. section at the hardcore punk page. See you there. 68.39.152.45 +" It might be better to go here Template_talk:Drugbox and post your problem. Maybe they can make the drug box automatically line wrap in future. | T@1k? " +Im ignorant there. 02:58, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) +I have given trying to get unblocked. By that, I meant that unless PM800 wants to say something to me I won't saying thing to PM800. If he/she asks me something then yes I'll respond but I won't harass. And, even though I won't do it again, I don't see why I got blocked. All I did was trout PM800, explain why it wasn't vandalism, and PM800 trouts me. I know you'll say this isn't about PM800, but it's not fair. PM800 complains about me trouting with a reasonand then PM800 trouts me with really no reason other then revenge. Why should I keep quiet? Anyway after I'm freed from block, I'm deleting all of this from my talk page. If PM800 ever edits my talk page without a constructive reason, I'll put a standard warning on PM800's page and report PM800 to WP:AIV 74.89.58.36 +Thank you for experimenting with the page Comet on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. + R/W +" Taking the discussion to wider audience to gain a wider conesus on the issue, my views should not be the only ones if my views are not the conesus ill accept but i want to gaina conesus on this and have it achived for future reference for all editors. [] (talk - contrib) " +June 2006 (Check!) +Nice to see you bury shit you don't like, ScrapIronIV. Typical Wikipedian. Kindly go fuck yourself, asshole. +"Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including: The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate. The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you. The ability to start new pages. The ability to rename pages. The ability to edit semi-protected pages. The ability to upload images. The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website. The eligibility to become an administrator. Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users. We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by [ creating an account]. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. (Talk) " +Your comments indicate you are not acc3epting the reality, which is that Mike was an abusive sock. With actions like those of yourself and Fighting it is hard to see how mediation will work, and those comments are still subject to removal and their restoration subject to meatpuppet claims. Mike's comments must be purged from the wikipedia, a scorched earth policy is the only realistic way of combatting this highly abusive user, and neither you nopr others can continue aiding, abetting and supporting this and other banned users with impunity. THis is not about censorship, it is about addressing the issue of banned users, wikipedia is not a public service and nobody has a right to edit, it is a privilege that Mike D78 never had, nor Farenhorst. Others such as Dyskolos are suspected socks so i left their comments intact whereas there is no question or doubt concerning Mike's guilt, read the block log. Your cvlaim the block is about to be removed is unsubstantiated, +" Oppose. The contents of this list are quite clear; members must be Jewish and Nobel laureates]. How do we decide? Same way as always, whatever reliable sources say. Similar lists, including List of African-American Medal of Honor recipients, List of African-American United States Cabinet Secretaries, List of Asian American Medal of Honor recipients, and even List of Jewish Medal of Honor recipients do not have such statements, despite the fact that the definition of ""African American"", ""Asian American"", and ""Jew"" can, at times, be a bit fuzzy. These are all Featured Lists, indicating that they represent Wikipedia's best practices. It's unclear why List of Jewish Nobel laureates would need something that similar Featured Lists do not. (talk) " +your right bro, your so right.....not! i hate you. block me you fagplease +I'm always in favor of the practice that categories must be mentioned in the article, and the rule that ideas mentioned in the lead section should already be in the article body. The Soros/CFR connection deserves a bit of expansion in the article body or it deserves nothing. +" I had cupcakes for Christmas, take one for what you've done. iXavier [talk|edits|logs] Thank you! It will go great with the cookies I had. — xplicit List of United States Presidents by genealogical relationship deletion From glancing at your talk page, it seems most of your wikipedia contributions are deletions. Is there any way I can access all of the information you removed? (When you delete the page, it appears it also removes the 'history tab'.) Anyways, I would appreciate accessing this information if you could help out. Thanks in advanced. Nevermind my pervious request. I have since found an archive of the page. It would be helpful if you conformed to filing explanations for your deletions. Please don't take this request personally; I am only asking that you be considerate, as you are deleting people's time and efforts. I hope you have a happy holiday season and new year! As far as I can tell, Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States and List of United States Presidents by genealogical relationship were deleted by other administrators, not me. If the deletion summaries of these pages aren't clear, it's best to contact those admins for a clearer explanation. — xplicit Deletion of Glenorchy Air Why are you doing this? You have deleted a page that has existed for many years with no apparent rationale. Now I'm going to have to correct this. The article was proposed for deletion by another editor and remained uncontested for an entire week. The rationale was clearly given: ""Expired PROD, concern was: Notability has not been established, lacks significant coverage in secondary sources"". Even with my attempt to look for reliable sources, there was hardly anything that established notability of the company. — xplicit What does it take to establish notability? In general all airlines are considered to be notable, See Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Notability which says ""All airline companies"". But if you want to delete one you can delete Aspiring Air which is no longer in business. When you put it back I can put a list of sources such as from the New York Times There's a general notability guideline that will show a general idea of what an article should contain. Since you plan to work on the article, I went ahead and restored it. I trust that you will add the sources you speak of to establish notability of this topic. — xplicit Restore my cousins page thank you... YOUR REFERENCE... 01:10, 23 November 2012 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted page Neville Williams (Expired PROD, concern was: 2 sources in article - Both with no references to subject of article (WPW:GNG). Brief mentions on Web 2.0 sites like YouTube and other non-notable reference/news sites. WP:NOTABILITY) I require you to reverse your deletion of my cousins page thank you. Neville ""Chappy"" Williams is a well respected Wiradjuri Elder here in Australia; and a well known Sovereign Rights representative for our Wiradjuri Tribe. It's very insulting and demeaning that you've deleted his page; some could consider your action as politically inflammatory. Your deletion has also impacted on links from other pages. http:// +I am creating this account as my last one, +Queer Wikipedians You are creating an article in the main namespace, not a category (:Category:Queer Wikipedians) or an article in the meta namespace like Wikipedia:Queer Wikipedians, where I already moved your text. +It is not awful, but it needed some trim. Not sure if the latest people are commenting on the current version or the untrimmed one. +For your patience, fairness and diplomacy Well deserved. Keep up the good work. +HELLO BY the way. HELLO +Old postings but as nobody has replied - Germany only uses D-A (multi-engine with a MTOW over 20,000kg), D-B (multi-engine 14,000 to 20,000kg) , D-C (multi-engine 5.700 to 14,000kg, D-E (single engine below 2,000kg), D-F (single engine 2,000 to 5700kg), D-G (multi engine below 2,000kg), D-H (rotary wing), D-K (powered gliders), D-L (airships), D-M (ultralights) and D-O (free balloons) for aircraft, so nothing outside of DAA to DRZ Philipines uses RP (for Republic Philippines) I presume they have some exception from the ICAO to use it. The russians only use RA and RF for aircraft. Swaziland/Fiji - Fiji uses DQ (from 3DQ to avoid confusuion because 3D is used by Swaziland) DQ is not used by Germany for aircraft. +I will indeed, thank you for your welcome, great to be back! It's really sad that these guys have been attacking everyone who doesn't conform to their ideology. 3 Months on and still they are hung on to poor language and extremism. +", 22 January 2008 (UTC) If your still upset about the playable list get over it, its proof. The maker of super smash brothers made that video which counts as confirmation of Lucario, Ness and Jiggly. )If your not regard this.) I absolutely cannot comprehend if you're being serious or not but you gotta stop acting underage if you're going try to talk to me. This whole ""YOU'RE UPSET ABOUT THIS SO AND SO"" is an underage kiddo routine and quite frankly I'm not up to it at the moment to even bother with your crap. You're not helping this discussion by going for or against with any previous points and I take your comment like a stalker behavior. I haven't acted upset on this page so kindly shut the hell up. I have no reason for being upset but if you lack the mentality for knowing my actions on the Smash Bros series page then you really should stop talking to me. I'm asking you now to stop trying to troll me. Grow up. He believes dojo is the only source when i told him it wasn't he got mad and undid all the playable list please some one tell him that the Nintendo video is reliable. I honestly don't care anymore to argue for YouTube or not, this has gone off-topic because a certain troll has decided to remove any criticism he gets for bothering me. I'm not answering anything until my original messages which he removed are restored. This user has been doing this since this morning. I have read enough, I'm not going to play your troll game. This is a waste of time and space. I'm not promoting your attitude and stalker behavior and I'm asking someone else to remove this seeing as this is jut a personal play area for DeityLink to harass and troll me. 23:50" +I did, then he proved that he did not act in good faith, so i stoped assuming something falsified. +" stuff still tastes lousy on ice cream That's certainly the sort of factoid you can learn by joining and participating in www.bobistheoilguy.com. Perhaps I should create a ""Bob Is The Oil Guy"" entry, with Bob Winter's life story, and draw the BITOG crowd off mucking up worthwhile entries onto that, much like excrement attracts flies. " +" I really disagree with you. Anyone who, like myself, lived in FRY and S&M; understand how much different were political structures of these countries. FRY was a federation (at least nominally), while S&M; was a outright confederation. It's really indicative that the position of federal Prime Minister was abolished in 2003, and merged with the position of President. Separate articles are need in this case; we can't merge different articles on Wikipedia just because someone wants ""information in one place"". Also, you said that in 2002, the country was renamed to ""S&M;"". It's a mistake; that happened in 2003. " +Not sure about this, but shouldn't this article be merged with GMC Savana, similar to GMC Vandura being the same article as the Chevy Van? +" I Lol'd. MF, sometimes you crack me up. Are alt texts supposed to add description? I thought it was just an extension of the old HTML days, where you have a picture of a dingo, and when you hover over the image, it says, ""dingo."" type! snype? " +fuck you, you slut, you deserve having a blind man chop your balls off with a chainsaw. +" Good Man. A good man lays on this page! A dedicated Beyoncé fan! An amazing editor! I advise everyone on Wikipedia to know this user, for he is the most honest and thoughtful editor that edits here on Wikipedia! I tell you farewell Jivesh. We Have means of alternate communication between us, so this is really just a ""Talk to you later"" ] STACK STACK STACK " +" elephant Thanks for looking at the article but I' have no idea what you mean by ""there seems to be false precision issues with units of measure in the article, probably from several generations of being converted from imperial to metric, and back again"". " +KaiserHatners edits Hi KaiserHatner, I think your recent edits are fine. I would still prefer the structure of the introduction to be German-type reform is X British-type reform is Y, and British-type liberal is like German-type reform whereas at the moment it is German-type reform is X British-type liberal is like German-type reform, and British-type reform is Y But I leave it to your judgement. +" Out of date Concerning the line ""A early version of this article was an extract from The Household Cyclopedia of General Information, 1881. The methods described may therefore be out of date."" The methods in this article are still used in the industry to determine the age of an animal. Cheers " +I see... thank you anyway. (talk) +Concerning Encyclopedia Britannica Remove the references to Encyclopedia Britannica or I will. Encyclopedia Britannica is not a valid citation! +I have fixed the plot and rewrote and shortened it a bit. +I have realised that i made a mistake writing 1884, il remove it, i was looking at the GAAworld website (which is linked on the page)and the article under the title Trinity Gaels said 1884 and ive since noticed that the article refers to the GAA even tho the title is Gaels so il change it now, thanks 18:10 4 December 2006 +Hey thanks for fixing up those typos! I'm not too great with spelling so it's awesome to have you filling that gap. We all do what we're best at here, and it seems like you have some skills we can definitely use. I've added some more content to the article if you want to take a look. Cheers! +|.]]Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry''' on the Articles for deletion page. Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion. Steps to list an article for deletion: {{subst:afd}} • Preloaded debate OR'' {{subst:afd2|pg=|cat=|text=}} • {{subst:afd3|pg=}} [ log] Category:Articles for deletion +" Help:Using colours and HTML color names might be helpful. How about this for your signature: imacowboy. Thoughts? (talk) " +" I'm placing both for deletion. Talk " +"== Thanks again! == Wow! Thank you so much, Plumcouch. See, this was the problem: I couldn't exactly understand the copyright policy and which information to provide, so I tried something random. Your message was an extremely big help, and I will try to find a suitable picture withing a few days. Once again, thank you! By the way, can you teach me how to put pictures on articles properly, so in the future I won't need to come begging for help? If I am getting a bit annoying, please tell me so I don't bug you; I know this was probably troublesome for you, so thank you, thank you, thank you! Guess my Name Contest You have been invited to participate in the: GUESS MY NAME CHALLENGE (Try to guess my name and put it in my Talk Page under the section Guess My Name) Guess my first name.Contest ends June 16, 2006. Stop being a power freak Hi Plumcouch, Although you are not an administrator, you seem to be a self-styled Wikipedia policeman. I don't understand why you have been going around giving people strict instructions on what to write and what not to write. For the Aamir Khan and Vidya Balan pages, you insist on not having links to fansites. I don't understand why. If you want the power of an administrator, become an administrator. Don't take the law into your own hands. Administrators are not the law. Admins are normal users with more abilities. See here: [] Fan sites are a big problem. First of all, most of them violate copyright laws by displaying pictures which don't have proper copyright information and strictly, those pages are not allowed to display them. If anther page (like Wikipedia) links them, Wiki can get into trouble and with it the entire project. Also, if you add one fansite, you have to add them all. Wiki is no linkfarm and not there to improve people's traffic. Add content instead of links. Regarding the Meera Jasmine page, you are exceptionally rigid about what belongs in the page and what does not. You want a citation for everything, and you claim that a lot of the information is not relevant on the page. Do you want us to say ""Meera Jasmine is an Indian actress"", immediately put up a citation, scan a copy of her birth certificate and put it up there just to prove that she exists? I don't doubt she's an actress. Google has various entries on her to prove that. If someone claims she's a devotee of Ganesha, movie xyz has been a mega-super successful film, it would be nice to add citations so you can identify such claims as not merely fangush or rumour which is very common on actor/actress pages. Lots of actor/actress sites don't have references and I admit that's still a big problem. In the Filmography, I don't understand why you say the director and the co-star belongs in the movie's entry and not in Meera Jasmine's entry. I'm sure you understand that the career of every actor or actress is shaped by the number of big names he/she works with, and it is a reflection of the actor's career. So the info certainly belongs to the Meera Jasmine entry. ""Big names"" is a very controversial topic. What's big name? Is a big name still big compared to international directors/actors like Tom Cruise or Steven Spielberg? Furthermore there have been problems with citing co-stars and directors to show that actor xyz is ""greater"" than actor abc. If you follow the edit history of actors Ajith and Joseph Vijay, you'll find a good example. In order to stop people and fans from these kind of edit wars, I think it's better to keep filmographies as simple as possible - else, things can easily be mistaken as fangush or hero glorification. Also, most actor/actress pages in the Indian Cinema Project have filmographies with just the roles and the movie - it was universally agreed upon and no one of the participants wanted to change that. If you insist upon changing the way articles at the Project should be written, you can make a formal proposal here: . And why do you insist on creating links to pages that do not exist, such as the movie pages which do not exist? If you insist on creating a link, you make sure the link points to something, and if a page does not exist, create the page first before pointing to it. If you have a red link (one without an article behind it), people easily identify it as such and are generally more easily motivated to click on that link and create the article if they have seen the movies. Those red li +" The vicious attacks on Ward Churchill Ward Churchill appears to be the latest author attacked by a strikling super-conservative country. I have been reading a lot about American sociology lately, as it relates to the violent suppresion of the left*. I knew little about Churchill, and had a negative view of him because of his 9/11 article and infamous ""little eichman"" quote. I then stumbled upon one of his articles: It was absolutly incredible. Ward Churchill is an incredible historian. What do these attacks on Ward Churchill do? They cause Americans to shy away from reading Churchill's work, and they send a clear message to others who may want to attack American foreign policy: that you can lose your job if you criticize America, that you will be attacked viciously if you criticize America. It is the latest form of American suppression of the Left. I am just interested if there is a list of authors, or a book or article about those who have been ""Swift Boated"" like Churchill. If so, I would like to add this to the article. I think Americans need to know how America's sophisticated Propoganda system** operates. *Including such books as , which asks such questions as why has America had more people killed in labor disputes than any other country? Why doesn't America have a labor party like other industrialized countries? Why are union numbers so low in America compared to other industrialized countries? As Ellen Schrecker said: Political repression in America...is American as apple pie American Inquisition: The Era of McCarthyism, Tape 9: Joe McCarthy and the Loss of China. ""I have the greatest admiration for your propaganda. Propaganda in the West is carried out by experts who have had the best training in the world in the field of advertizing and have mastered the techniques with exceptional proficiency ... Yours are subtle and persuasive; ours are crude and obvious ... I think that the fundamental difference between our worlds, with respect to propaganda, is quite simple. You tend to believe yours ... and we tend to disbelieve ours."" Soviet correspondent based five years in the U.S. When I first visited Russia, in 1986, I made friends with a musician whose father had been Brezhnev's personal doctor. One day we were talking about life during 'the period of stagnation' - the Brezhnev era. 'It must have been strange being so completely immersed in propaganda,' I said. 'Ah, but there is the difference. We knew it was propaganda,' replied Sacha. That is the difference. Russian propaganda was so obvious that most Russians were able to ignore it. They took it for granted that the government operated in its own interests and any message coming from it was probably slanted - and they discounted it. In the West the calculated manipulation of public opinion to serve political and ideological interests is much more covert and therefore much more effective. Its greatest triumph is that we generally don't notice it - or laugh at the notion it even exists. Lessons in How to Lie About Iraq August 17, 2003 by the Observer/UK " +So for my group (the events at Lafayette section): we have a couple sections with overlapping information so we'll need to fix that. I also gave each section a title, but feel free to change it. Professor told my group to start with the student protest, so I didn't include any information about the original announcement of the rejection; did another group cover this or should my group include it? +{unsigned} It's a common quote. I can't find the primary source right now, but found a secondary which makes it verifiable. From what I understand the clergy at the scene instigated a mob against Peter, called him a heretic, devil, etc.. +Reading Cole's blog entry cited for the Feith stuff, I think I understand Isarig's objection. I will try to rewrite the section to cut Feith out altogether. Everyone, let me know if you agree with the revision. +" A barnstar for you! The Barnstar of Diligence Great to see you back too " +" Non-Admins List Thank you for your understanding, to say that's a sore subject with me right now is a drastic understatement, i'm luckily down to about one nightmare about it a week or so. afist '''''' " +STOP MESSING WITH MY WORK JOSHBUDDY. YOU DID NOT CREATE FEDERALIST NO. 1. I DID. I CREATED THE ENTIRE ARTICLE. I AM SICK OF WIKIPEDIA TREATING ME LIKE SHIT; THEREFORE, I WITHDRAW MY LABOUR FROM THE WIKIPEDIA SITE. PLEASE STOP PUTTING MY WORK BACK ON THE SITE. I DO NOT WANT IT THERE. +" Talk:List of social networking websites I've . What do you think? " +Yes, that's exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. Scaleshombre, I saw that AfD already but haven't made up my mind: I want to look at the references in the article and do some snooping myself before I commit. Thanks, +""" Removed ""Only tag for deletion your own personal pages [implicit in section title], and only if you have a genuine reason for requesting it be deleted [The guideline itself is specifying main reasons you cannot ask; the patrolling admin will evaluate if it's appropriate]." +I see, so I should cite the hundreds and hundreds of LDS writings on their own website to prove what a homophobe this guy is? +The question is not what makes sense to Wikipedia editors, but rather how does the scientific literature use the term. The article now implies that the term is NOT restricted to crystalline phases, and is even used for gases such as dioxygen and ozone (trioxygen). If this is incorrect, we need reliable sources which say so explicitly. +I can't believe that nobody has posted here!! My first girlfriend was from São Paolo she was French too!! +I think that's what I meant, sorry. (𒁳) +User ‎75.51.171.155 and NPOV Please do not continue the discussion at WP:ANI. It has been moved to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard, so please comment over there. Thank you. +"Is Sitchin a ""scholar""? Well, sort of in a way, in the same way that Immanuel Velikovsky was a ""scholar""a self-taught person with very firmly held beliefs about ancient history and the recent history of the Solar System who was immune to any suggestion that he might be wrong. Sitchin and Velikovsky are known to be wrong because the ""real world"" really does not resemble the fantasy world these ""scholars"" described. The fact that so many readers among the public find Sitchin's ideas interesting is a testament to their scientific illiteracy and ignorance of how knowledge is accrued by true scholars. " +A tag has been placed on Sukip, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Sukip. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. +Diesel Park West Hi Michig, I've been asked by the band if the article could be changed back to the previous incarnation. I know it wasn't encyclopediacally correct in style and needed a bit of tarting up but if i changed it back, would i get a virtual slap in the gob? Don't want to upset anyone! Liam +Kicked out? The article used for the citation that Omarion was fired for the song leak seems to be a misinterpretation of a Twitter post, hardly a legitimate source. Omarion himself has stated in interviews that he left of his own free will to have more control over his career. +" Image:PMLogoColorSmallFramed Stephane.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PMLogoColorSmallFramed Stephane.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ω612 " +Khatri subcastes and their meanings Hi, I am a writer on Sikhism and I am interested in knowing the origin of the Khatri surnames, their meaning or why they were called so and for what reason, etc. Same information on Jatt subcastes would also help. Rajinder Nijjhar, +Again ??? leave me alone I asked you not to contact me anymore. Also, Sign your posts on talk pages. Anyway I replied in my talk page, but please stop sending me messages, don't answer me anymore, got it, Cinderella ? +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | talk | contribs | editor review | " +" Unlock please Please unlock this article so that I can add his illustrious title of ""KING FANBOY""" +You're really hot. I watch you when you leave your house. You're very fit, big man. +It seems to me you do not have answer. For vandalizing Talk Page as document of conversations. Please revert you actions 74.213.188.138 +Yes it does, Mustaine was contacted by the makers of the game because they wanted to sponser the Gigantour. He was in the process of writing the song but had no title. So he ended up calling the unfinished song Gears of War. Jay316 +That's my point. If they can't make any of that stuff - which should be simpler than gate technology (lest the asgaard or tolan could have invented it, maybe) - how can they make the more complex stuff like ZPMs or drone weapons? +" The IP is wrong. The only category of people who would be offended by the word ""mythology"" are fundamentalists who don't know what the word means. The 90+% of Christians who are not fundamentalists (and therefore don't care) and fundamentalists who know what the word means (and therefore know that it has no bearing on the story's factuality one way or the other) would have no reason to be offended by the category. Per WP:SLANG, we should be writing using professional, encyclopedic language; this applies both ways we don't use the word ""myth"" the way people who are ignorant of its technical definition, and we don't avoid the word solely to avoid offending such people based on their choosing to misinterpret us. (聖やや) " +Hi ChrisO Hi ChrisO I don't understand what you are trying to say. The article is cited to: COPYRIGHT PACIFIC NEWS SERVICE 450 Mission Street, Room 506 San Francisco, CA 94105 415-243-4364 Date: 06/04/1993 The fact that someone posted it on geocities has nothing to do with the credibility of the article; this is original article with full copyright notice. It's over 13 years old and was published when internet was only barely beginning to be used. What's the problem? Is the truth problem again? I would not be surprised if you banned me and all your opponents from wikipedia. Now, I see, we are not even allowed to use this article as a source, but our opponents are allowed to use Lewis Mackanzie's genocide denials as a source ? Don't you see double standard here? +I haven't learned how to revert. Gold mining has been vandalized. +" Error In the Peru featured article box, why is ""home"" highlighted? contribsTALK " +" Actually Micaglia said that DALMATIAN and SLAVONIC and SERBIAN and BOSNIAN and CROATIAN etc, were Illyrian, and not JUST Croat. Provide me you sources, for the Dalmatians and Ragusans, calling themself ""Croatians"" prior the 1800. I was unable to find them. I've provided proper sources for the ""Serbocroatian language"" (that funny language that in Croatia cease to exist) This story about the evil Italian claiming Dalmatia is a Croatian paranoia that does not need to be commented. Trust in it if you like, and start to plan the next ethnic cleaning for the glory of the great Croatian nation. Regards." +I wrote that shit ages ago, what are you a slaking faggot +I don't know what to do about that. That isn't very nice though. I'll see what I can do. 6 July 2005 20:03 (UTC) +You are making personal attacks on other wikipedians on that talk page. Talk page edits are still edits and should be made in good faith. +No, by going to the Favre page, below it says completions, attemps, TD's and yards, by clicking on any of those 4 you get the leaderboard for those things, so that page it directs you to will direct you to any of those leaderboards, that's a easier and more suitible way of doing it. starwars1955 +Merger proposal Hi, I propose a merge of Napa City-County Library into this article, no information on said article, not particuarly notable. yes/no? +Alrighty You can go fuck yourself. +Major changes - updated to version 5a of the survivors series +Infobox Infobox says it's silvery white. Pictures indicate it's not. Was probably copied from somewhere else and not changed. Anyone know how to properly describe it? +Z-Transform is missing ... How can you avoid including Laplace and his Z-Transform in the history of control theory? I think he belongs FIRST. +High Importance? … +You were adding the BMJ article to the lead section. It should be discussed in context. Let me rephrase what bothered me about the Carter Albrecht edit: you were editorialising, rather than stating the facts. I am in turn a bit annoyed that you are now attacking me rather than taking my well-intended offer to help you resolve your difference of opinion with Homerduo. You will find that I am not biased towards either of you. I think the varenicline article needs to be neutral and fair, with an appropriate balance struck between the possibly slightly alarmist reports of possible harm and the studies that were only designed to find large outcome differences. Now can we continue our interactions on Talk:Varenicline? I will not expect a response from you here unless you wish to discuss a totally unrelated subject.  | T@lk +Well, how about this I heard her voice several characters in the DiC series of the Care Bears. And besides, there's not much on the actor Michael Fantini and that article's still up on here. How do ya explain that? User:ChipmunkRaccoon 6:49 pm, 27 April 2010 +Janet Yellen's Claims need further investigation She is correct that lending institutions not subject to the CRA are responsible roughly half of recent subprime originations. However, a substantial portion was originated under CRA. She also provides no evidence that subprime delinquencies are either uniformly distributed or more highly concentrated in the non-CRA lenders. If CRA loans accounted for as few as 15% of subprime loans, they could still be a significant proportion of those in default. She merely asserts that the loans were properly underwritten. +Please stop with your vandalizing of the Jim Clark page. +REDIRECT Talk:2014 Venezuelan protests +"{| cellspacing=""0"" style=""width: 238px; background: #eee;"" | style=""width: 48px; height: 45px; text-align: center;"" | | style=""font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: black; text-align: center;"" | Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with . |} " +" Yesterday I requested administrators at WP:AN to take a look into the case. Avengers " +" And I want all edits on your Wikimedia page (this one done by me to be deleted also. Jack In122.49.151.145 " +This is an article about the Xbox 360 technical problems and the Towel trick while being a stupid thing to do is a legitimate topic on that subject. If you have a problem with the link to the Engadget article we should replace it with a link to a similar article on Xbox360Fanboy.com or Joystiq.com. Again another case of Wageslave's magical powers of knowing peoples secret intentions while they are writing articles. +I stand by my deletion on the skepticism page. I didn't delete the whole article by any means. +You're Hell-bound! Adam, as seen as you've admitted to being a pro-[faggot]], you are going to end up buring up in the Lake of Fire in Hell! - ( ) +Merge discussion for Match crossbow An article that you have been involved in editing, Match crossbow, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. +" I understand that Ono. These reports ( of abuse etc.) are the central reason for the person's notability in international media. So we can't gloss them over either. What am saying is that we should present things in an academic manner. Second academic analysis of teachings etc ( for instance Lawrence Babb.) etc are just objective academic analysis - we should not be labeling them as praise or criticism. If there are positive things said about the person in reputable third party sources - we obviously shouldn't gloss them over either. Presenting objective content in the so called ""miracles"" section, etc. are again not criticism in itself. But just objective material - we are merely letting the reader know that this is what reputable source BBC, DTV etc have to say on the topic. Where is there any ""criticism"" in this? " +"== October 2010 == Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits to the page Harry%20Hill, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you. Some good links for newcomers are: Help contents - the main help page. Quick guide - a ""cheatsheet"" listing the main editing commands. The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! " +If one can read english, we can see the verse is about Apes. There's no OR. (talk•contribs) +" Yes I am flexible but I have no idea what a GAN is. It is a surprise to me that I need you to check my edits before they can be crossed off the list. When I made comments such as ""how's this?"", I was not speaking to you. I thought I was speaking to other editors. Perhaps it would help to improve Wikipedia relationships if you would point editors to a wiki page that explains the process you are using. I realize that I am coming across as a little peeved and that's because I am. It does not seem reasonable to me that you should use the talk page for your personal score sheet. In my years of editing Wikipedia I have thought of myself as being on an equal playing field with other editors and have recently had to deal with the fact that Wikipedia allows paid employees of government agencies to edit articles (see talk page Clothianidin. That experience has left a bitter taste in my mouth. Since many of my interests/edits are related to ""underdog"" issues, this has resulted in my fear of seeing ""experts"" taking over our encyclopedia. My area of experience/expertise is in the medical field and I have seen it happen to Wiki medical articles. So yes, my hackles do raise at times. Clearly you are interested in improving Warren's article-but is it possible that a sheep in wolf's clothing reviewer could ""improve"" it as well? " +Nice speech raintheone seriously well done;), nice way to put it GAYsorby I like that whole Janine thing;), your right I wont go away but thats because of this conspiracy against me I wont leave to I get what I want! 86.46.225.78 +We now can see at least one person watched Penn & Teller's Bulls**t. I was wondering if they got their facts correct or not. 68.55.6.178 +" Hi, Clmcdaniel, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. You may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions. For help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ. If you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. Feel free to post questions on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly. If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.TAB You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only. You may want to add yourself to the new user log. If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. On IRC, check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills. If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal. Happy Wiki-ing. — talk contribs PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian. Click here to respond to this message!" +Thankyou-I'm most interested in this . +Atleast register an account if you're going to make offensive comments on my talk page. +" Origins= The two paragraphs about the Christian allegorical theme about love and the two brides being based on two meanings of love, which relate to the latin words ""amor"" and ""veritas"" seems contradictory to the fact that the story is, apparently based, on a ""Russian-Jewish folktale."" Although the Christian/Jewish contradiction may be attributed to the relationship between the two religions, the fact that the entire thing is made clear by the fact that the meanings of love ""come out better in Latin"" raises a few red flags for me. Hell, Russian isn't even a Romance language. On top of all that, I can find no evidence that Theophile Guerin ever existed, or his 1836 book about a monk and a dead woman. It's very interesting as an idea, but since this information of Guerin is given rather than a citation, I say that the entire two paragraphs should be IMMEDIATELY deleted. However, I've already spent too much time writing all this and researching that, and am too unsure to actually delete it. If i get around to rechecking this discussion and no one has said anything or disagreed, I will edit the entry, as there is no citation and it seems unfactual and invented fictional. THalleck" +"==Riddle me this== Answer me something? You deleted from Pacific War ""a massive strategic blunder"" & ""(mistaken)"" from Japan's belief the U.S. would enter the war regardless. Why? I know of no historiographer who thinks it wasn't ""a massive strategic blunder"", & the cited sources confirm the Japanese belief was mistaken; Willmott's Barrier agrees. Have you got better information? What, for instance? " +I have given a link to his PDF in the reflist - I will fix those characters. +please go to link to support page nominated for deletion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pit_Bull +. fukk it im goin 2 encyclopedia dramatica +Pompous verdict - how would you like the evidence to look like? Did you look for this Google score? For the record, neither am I a professional cosmologist, but I have during the past few years, taken on all theoretical graduate courses in astrophysics given at the University of Stockholm. As stated, expertise has no say om WP. I have read most of Masreliez papers and found his model to be far from fringe. / +" WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive Thank you for your contributions! WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive The Working Barnstar For your tireless and endless efforts in assessing biography articles, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Working Man's Barnstar. The Golden Wiki Award For your exceptional contributions to the WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Golden Wiki Award. " +wikipedia is a latter day religion, you idiots need shooting +you could always relive your stress through Seppuku? +Past that it was referred to as 'The Wsteland' not New Holland. 'Wasteland has a meanign other tyan the obvious. Its political as well as nomenclature. +WP/KL/Jeelan Central College (Navodaya School) Hennamulla, Panadura Tel: 0382299275 Email: wp.kl.jeelan@gmail.com Web:www.jeelan.sch.lk www.twitter.com/Jeelannews www.facebook.com/jeelan.CC +Well he said it himself. I shall paraphrase: thanks to feminism, unattractive women now have easier access to mainstream society. What about that statement is not feminist? +I suggest a merge with Economy of Bulgaria. - ☣'''' A ? +", 21 January 2012 (UTC) I have, but why (for example) does a picture of a building help the reader understand ""School of management was ranked #9 in the nation by the wall street journal"" - answer, it does not, how does a picture of the ""The Alfiero center"" convey or help the reader better understand that it is ""a state of the art learning facility"" - answer, it does not. You need to explain why these pictures are not just a random collection of images from around campus added only to make the article ""look"" better, more suited to the university marketing effort than an encyclopedia entry. king (edits) 23:19" +" That ""football (soccer)"" seems like a good idea, although the gaa footsoldiers on here will probably reject it. They want a propaganda piece. " +Legalized gambling I was reading the information provided on the discussion page and the submitter stated that there were only 11 states with gambling. I assume, based on the list provided, that he was limiting his consideration only to states with full casino gambling. In actuality, 48 states authorize some form of gambling under their own laws. Then you must consider the states that have various levels of indian gaming under the provisions of the Indiang Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. The only two states that have absolutely no form of legalized gaming are Hawaii and Utah. Actually there is quite a comprehensive list of games allowed by state that can be found at the National Conference of State Legislatures' website (http://www.ncsl.org). In addition, the website for the Alaska State House of Representatives Task Force on Alaska Gaming Policy also has a number of valuable gaming related links. That web address is: http://www.akrepublicans.org/houtfgam/. +Why is it called 'right-wing' What's up with calling it 'right-wing' authoritarianism? It's not a solely right wing trait. In fact, I could point to many more left-wing authoritarians than right wing. +", 9 June 2013 (UTC) So many anons and new users coming to vote is quite surprising. Talk 13:36" +", 23 April 2008 (UTC) Yeah, I was having trouble with the collapsible divisions too. You're also right about the ""id."" thing. In fact, the ""id."" in 70 was wrong, since 69 was a Yermolinsky cite, and 70 a Watson cite. I had inserted a bunch of stuff between the prior Watson cite and 70, and hadn't noticed the need to change the ""id."" Now I've killed all the ""id.""s except those within a single reference number. 05:28" +" Wikipedia Regrets The Errors [Suggested Text]: From June to September of 2007, several false and misleading critical statements appeared at the National Civilian Community Corps (also known as AmeriCorps NCCC) page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Civilian_Community_Corps), in violation of Wikipedia standards. This is the false text as it appeared: National Civilian Community Corps ""...Criticisms The NCCC program has met with sharp criticisms from some fiscal conservatives who accused it of being a ""boondoggle"".[4] Most notably, Libertarian pundit and commentator James Bovard has been one of the most vocal Americorps NCCC opponents, calling it a ""waste and fraud""[5], in addition to dedicating an entire chapter of criticisms of the program in his book ""Feeling Your Pain: The Explosion and Abuse of Government Power in the Clinton-Gore Years."" Robert Sweet, the former director of the National Institute of Education, labeled it ""a fraud"". ^ http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188385,00.html ^ http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1000americorps.htm"" Wikipedia relies on its readers and volunteer contributors to avoid or challenge and correct misleading or false information. The following has been called to our attention: 1. The statement that read ""...Bovard has been one of the most vocal Americorps NCCC opponents, calling it a ""waste and fraud,"" cited as its source an article at this address by Bovard: http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1000americorps.htm Nowhere in that article does Bovard make that statement. No mention of ""AmeriCorps NCCC"" nor of the ""National Civilian Community Corps"" appears in that article, nor is AmeriCorps NCCC called a 'waste and fraud."" We regret the error. 2. The same sentence went on to state the following: ""...Bovard has been one of the most vocal Americorps NCCC opponents, calling it a ""waste and fraud"", in addition to dedicating an entire chapter of criticisms of the program in his book ""Feeling Your Pain ..."" Upon investigation, this statement turns out to be untrue. Bovard's book (published in hardcover by St. Martin's press) does not contain a chapter of criticisms of AmeriCorps NCCC in the book ""Feeling Your Pain. In fact, neither ""AmeriCorps NCCC"" nor the ""National Civilian Community Corps are mentioned at all in the text of that book nor in the book index. (The chapter in question concerns the umbrella program, AmeriCorps, but does not mention the program known as ""AmeriCorps NCCC'"" or the ""National Civilian Community Corps"". (The only mention to NCCC is in the footnotes, referring to a speech by then-president Clinton, praising, not criticizing, the NCCC.) In sum, the book ""Feeling Your Pain"" does not dedicate ""an entire chapter of criticisms"" of AmeriCorps NCCC, contrary to the information posted at the Wikipedia website. We regret the error. 3. Also untrue was the sentence ""Robert Sweet, the former director of the National Institute of Education, labeled it [i.e., AmeriCorps NCCC] ""a fraud"". This sentence was misleading and false. It was placed at the National Civilian Community Corps page and referred to the antecedent in the previous sentence, the AmeriCorps NCCC. The claim relied on the article by Bovard at http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1000americorps.htm. No mention of either the ""National Civilian Community Corps"" nor of ""AmeriCorps NCCC"" appears in that article. No evidence has been put forward to support the statement that Mr. Sweet ever labeled AmeriCorps NCCC a ""fraud."" We regret the error. Wikipedia deeply regrets that this misleading text appeared at our National Civilian Community Corps website and that it persisted for as long as it did. The editor responsible for its appearance and continued re-emergence will no longer have access to the National Civilian Community Corps Wikipedia entry. Signed: _____ Calls to move forward on the National Civilian Community Corps page, to be a team player, etc., would be better received by this editor if Wikipedia posted a note something like the above at the NCCC site - not to mention, it might restore some of Wikipedia's credibility on this subject. Given the nature of the NCCC - a substantial and serious component of U.S. disaster relief and mitigation capacity - and its recent near-demise following misleading claims like those posted at Wikipedia, the statement above is not written as amusement. " +Gibnews: I agree with you that the geographical argument is a weak one in general. I understand that you are an activist on the issue of gibraltar and i ill try not to offend you. Your reference to Canarias is understandable. However, Morocco cannot validly claim the canaries because there are 2 million canarians who are neither arabs nor muslims and who are spaniards wishing to remain part of the EU and of a democratic state. Morocco has no relation whatsoever with the canaries at any level neither culturally nor historically. If there was such a relation and morroco was a functioning democracy i would be the first to support a morrocan claim on the islands. I understand, for example and contrary to most spaniards, morocco's claim on western sahara. Firstly, the saharaouis are very few and their independence would clearly have been the result of european colonialism of the maghreb and algerian expansionism in the region. I understand how countries which have been subjected to the humiliation of colonialism feel, their borders being decided by foreign powers, and i believe that the polisario should take their people out of the horrendous conditions they live in in the camps of Tindouf and move back to their land. Dont forget the history of panama which was a farflung province of Colombia: The US paid the local Firebrigade to declare independence so that they could control such a strategic region...which they control to this day. Have a good day! +" About that list of experts above. You and Voyt13 were previously talking about ""irrefutable science"" and ""laws of mathematics, physics, aerodynamics, materials' sciences, and others"". You do realize that ""Putin is a KGB monster who eats babies, so of course he blew up the plane"" coming from a self-styled ""authority on terrorism"" is not hard science, don't you? I also hope that you understand that this page here is not a place for investigations or research, so asking anyone around here to prove someone wrong or posting links to videos and texts for analysis is not very helpful for discussion. I don't make any claims regarding the findings of this investigation or put my reputation on the line (I'm trying to say that the origin of my IP is irrelevant), but I eagerly want to see reputable and independent organizations that do! Let me stress it - organizations themselves, and not their members. So far, it seems that none has even shown any interest in this investigation. And that is the problem here that your list doesn't address.93.80.137.44 The investigation and scientific research concerns only the plane crash. It is not about how much psychopathic murderer Putin is (That was the matter Politkovskaya or Litvinenko dealt with). I'm glad you would like to establish an independent international investigation, so if you are a U.S. citizen, please sing up the or join one of the organizations demanding that. " +Bute left office 8 April 1763 See discussion attached to Bute's article. +Habeas Corpus Act 1816 Hi again Ironholds. Sorry to add to your workload, but do you think you might add a wiki for the Habeas Corpus Act 1816? See here. As I understand it, the measure prevented penal ships and extraterritoriality such as that later used by the Americans in Guantanamo Bay. Thanks much. 66.185.200.1 +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Che'Nelle. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Said · Done) " +" Not so much triad as crispy aromatic-! " +" creating pages G'day Gilly - not sure how protocol works, so if this isn't the way one goes about asking this question in WP i know you'll let me know - i want to create a page on Michael Riley (an Australian artist). There is already a page on Michael Riley (a Canadian actor). How does one deal with this without putting ""(artist)"" into the actual page title? I have seen disambiguation pages, but not sure whether they are relevant here, not to mention how such things are done at a technical level. Any advice? hamiltonstone " +Sock comments stricken. +And a song Me cum, she cum, and you cum...I cum, you cum, we all cum tonight! +Are Renee, Megan, Lexie and Benjy also not DiMera, because they are not included. +It's my ip address, stop fucking with it, move out of your mom's basement and do something productive with your life, instead of fucking up wikipedia pages. +" Speedy deletion of Barton (band) A tag has been placed on Barton (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. " +So in the last round of the edit circle, I saw the following comment in the summary - (Undid revision 580143711 by Ajh1492 (talk) Hall Wroclaw >> Hall Wroclaw! About this bog, even in Poland, few have heard, so no exaggeration to placing him here) I bring it up here so we can discuss the concerns. +I will work on filling in the gaps in the history and evolution of the water treatment speding problems in the province of ontario. +" On the other hand, Deckiller and InShanee, no hard feelings. I don't want to fight anymore. I don't want to be mean even if is in response to meaness. So peace..k? duck talk " +Is it true... That umbrellas attract thunder? So if you're carrying one during a thunderstorm you risk a higher chance of being hit? +Hi Hi . Just to be clear, I haven't made any threat. You misunderstood. I told , that if he will vandalize Vaslui articles again, I will report him to the admins. I didn't said anything about me to block him, because I don't have this kind of power. Starting three or four weeks ago, an anonymous user, kept editing on Vaslui page, false information about the team. The media speculated many transfers, and this user edited them all as being sure transfers. This was for almost three weeks, when I just couldn't keep revert his edits anymore. So I started to reedit every single information from Vaslui page, and linked every sentence (because there was no reference before), and I applied for semi-protection for SC Vaslui page. After I got the page protected, there was no longer any false information, until edited again one of the players who just signed for Vaslui (back then, he wasn't). I saw his contribs, and noticed that he is 13 years old, and is a big SC Vaslui fan, and he edited almost the exact pages the anonymous editor wrote before. I don't think that's a coincidence. However, I noticed he has no current activity, so I think he either got my message, or he was blocked by admins. Either way, I'm more than happy. Hope you see this message, and reply me. Thanks! 20:04, 7 September (EET) +" Okay, it's clear English is your second language. I only got the first part, so I'll respond to that; they aren't real. Pure fantasy. A fairy tale. Myth. Know why? Simply because the fact that there are no archeological or recorded history of a ""Gija Joseon"" or the person known as ""Jizi"". Now I'd appreciate it if you would stop wiki-stalking me. " +WoWpedia Wowpedia is now at AfD. I left a comment there, you may want to as well. Thanks for leaving me the note after I declined the speedy. +I was wishing you a happy birthday. I'm your Wiki friend so let me back or else. +Strong oppose per all the BLP issues surrounding the main article already. +" Name of this page. Why is this pages named Moscow? Also, why does it have the band listed as Genghis Khan when the correct name is Dschinghis Khan. I see on the Dschinghis Khan page that they are known as Dschinghis Khan ""Within their native Germany"" - I didn't think Wikipedia would use anything but their true and correct name, not something that they may go under in other countries." +" Hey, I created a Wiki Category I created a new Wiki Category: ""Category:Bermuda Triangle"". I would appreciate it if you looked it over and would help me to expand it. Thank you. " +Trusliver, I was quite disturbed to see that you carelessly erased large sections of my work without any discussion with me beforehand. Among other things, I had been adding large numbers of new references to the Freddie Mercury page. As your carelessness here has cost me about 20 mintues of my time, there is no doubt that YOU are acting as the vicious “vandal” here. I recommend that you discuss major edits with others before making them. Moreover, I hope that you will refrain from making further edits until I am finished tonight. +WHAT A SURPRISE>! I thougth you were on vacation in mecico as you pretend to be this morm´ning and not being back before end of june... how strange! I couldnt reach you this morning but you are surely available to do som mormon business. You are a mormon and you will have to prove the opposit before I believe you. You cannot block me before the administrators I have contacted and the members of the board have respond and look upon this case. You are also a mormon sympathisor so this exclude you si ne qua non from emiting a neutral judgement on this case. You have in the past largely contribute to mormon propaganda so you are not to be trusted in your hability to emit a judgement on me respecting wikipedias requirements of being unpartial and neutral. First you insult me then you revert me than you make my text diseapeared and as it doesnt work to bend wikis rules so much you just piss on those rules and block me. How convenient! And what are your real arguemnt for doing so? You grab to preformed sentences taken from wiki vocabulary for doing so and excuse your illegal actions, but you forgot to illustrate it with exemple taken from the real case at hand and taking both parts and their actions in consideration. Your actions are unconsequent. I will be very happy to be prooved wrong. Sophie +"It's doubtful that it'll ever be revealed exactly which type of drug he was said to have used. There'll be rumors saying it was this or that. We know how these things usually go. All I've heard is that he was suspended for using some type of muscle enhancing drugs rumored to be anabolic steroids. This may be a rumor but according to wrestlezone.com, Masters was part of a television taping of OVW last night and his physique has changed drastically. According to the post, his physique has changed to the point that it'll be impossible to keep his ""Masterpiece"" gimmick going. Once again, this might be a rumor but here is the link: http://www.wrestlezone.com/article.php?articleid=157932579 " +Please also note that the quality of the prose (particularly the punctuation) is not at a GA level, which is a major reason for my request that the article undergoes a full review rather than just being given a pass to make a point. +hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like Jews hey i like +" Another Policy (moved from personal talk page) There is also another policy here: its called consensus, which holds precedence over being bold (the latter of which is a guideline, and thus not canonical). Consensus for this article is to not refer to badvista, and discuss any such changes before making it live (I already said, the discussions in this effect can be found in talk pages). Btw, I am preserving the original state of the article, nor ""making them without discussion"". Propose your concerns, and let others comment. This is how such articles are handled. Each party has to accept the majority decision. Btw, you are not supposed to edit archive pages. Comments should go to the talk page. And removing comments from user talk pages without a pointer to where it is also frowned on. Btw, sorry for coming of as bitey, that wasn't my intention. I haven't removed any comment from this page. If I don't edit the page, how can I add new comments? I suggest again, you propose the changes in the talk page, and let others respond. My comments are already there. The ball now lies with the community, and not either you or me. talk Sorry, didn't notice you already did. talk I find it very confusing as I read more. keep saying we need to propose changes in the talk page before we can edit it. However first I saw you don't discuss before you revert changes. Second I found that you didn't discuss every time before you edit pages or add new contents by viewing your own edit history, so it appears you are asking someone to follow some ""rules"" which you don't follow either. You are setting a bad example since you are an admin. After all no page saying we have to discuss pages before we can edit. Please point it out if I'm wrong since I have no time reading all minor policies and rules in Wikipeida. If is right about what it says, I could say Wikipedia gives you a false impression that anyone can contribute the article freely, as long as you are acting in good faith. Try to read WP:bold or Wikipedia does not have firm rules. The reality clearly tells you the other way round. Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules states that it is an official policy. It reads: Then could anyone try me why I received a serious warning from said you must follow this and that or you will be banned? I don't think I have violated any major policy or I am deserved to be banned (eg vandalism). Is it enough to issue a ban simply because you don't know ""BadVista.org is a bad source as the admin claims"" This further proves the so-called official policy above is non-existent. From the sound of it, the admin has been closing all room for argument once it is decided. It doesn't really allow you to ignore a rule in reality, no matter how sound you are. Let's say I think we should present all popular claims (BadVista.org is one of them) because we shouldn't filter on behalf of the readers. We should present both sides of the arguments and let the readers should judge by themselves. Of course I can't choose to ignore even if the official policy grant me to do so. Admin is always above the policy. On 14 Oct 2007, the page was locked up because ""I made some bad edit"" according to what said. I assume a lock up is not a decision made so lightly. As a matter of fact, I couldn't edit it anymore. In reality the admin essentially controlled everything. Although there are official policies in place, I seriously doubt whether admins will obey it. As a matter of fact, he once reverted all my contributions. Of course he offered no reasons when he first did it, clearly against the revert policy which said you should explain to the contributor before you revert. {{cquote|Act in good faith, and assume good faith on the part of ot +A plain Yugoslav tricolour is not merely a royalist symbol, it is the pan-Slavic flag. The plain Yugoslav tricolour flag-map is appropriate for the Yugoslavia-stub template because it is about Yugoslavia as a whole, not just the SFRY. The plain Yugoslav tricolour is not a royalist symbol, it is the same as the pan-Slavic flag and was used by Yugoslavists, it served as the flag of the rump Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the plain Yugoslav tricolours are seen used today by supporters of a state of Yugoslavia. +Your edits to How Holocausts Happen Hi there, Tea with toast. (Nice username, by the way.) I was just wondering why you removed the copyedit and wikify tags in How Holocausts Happen in this edit. It still needs copyediting and wikifying; were you planning on making these improvements? +" acolyte I see you too have become chums with blackjack but then again my plagiarism software gives some reasonable belief you too are one of his numerous sock puppets. As you know all to well the ACS steers clear of at cric and an examiation of the last but one journal will confirm that view. Someone said that the rotary club was the Mafia of the mediocre .. At least it raised money for good courses. According to the times edition I directed you too, research shows that 99 % of contributors are men 10% are banged up as many are social outcasts. My experience suggests they live in north Yorks and are mentally ill. They fail to grasp that no one reads the copied out claptrap they write. 97% of wp is read only by the editor. The magazine I edited had 1200 readers. I was not sacked so f__k off and I still have 76 copies of wisden. I believe the review copies I received as editor belonged to ACS so I gave them back Apologies for spelling, I,m on a canal boat and like you, the water is recondite with sh_t ...regards to your pretend friend John — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.50.132.236 " +don't vandalize, please! your reversion of my edits constitutes as vandalism, because I wasn't vandalizing myself! please don't do it again, or you may get banned. also, just because your wife is a black latina doesn't mean yuh need to start braggin' about dat pum pum all over the place. did you marry her because you love her, or because she was a black pum pum latina? racist coward... 216.102.76.54 +YOU F***** WHITE PROPAGANDA CHIEFS! GO AND DIE! DOWN WITH AMERICA! +" Yes, include - summoned by bot. The infobox should cover the basics of someone's biography. If cause of death is available and specific (such as a certain type of cancer), I don't see why it should not be included. Someone's death is always relevant to their life. YO 😜 " +Tvoz a magistrate is not judge. If you look at the organizational chart for Virginia courts on page 7 of http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/gd/gdinfo.pdf you will see that the magistrate system is separate and unique from all other Virginia court systems. http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/gd/gdinfo.pdf68.3.103.157 AndyB +Enjoy posing as an admin do you? +While we once had an article on the O'Higgins clan, it didn't cite reliable sources backing up the information, such as textbooks on Irish history or articles in reputable magazines. In fact, it gave no indication that the various O'Higginses actually all belonged to the same clan. Thus what could be used of it was merged into the article on the family. You can use the Article Wizard to write a new draft that summarizes what such sources report about the clan. Please note that we also have an article entitled Ó hUiginn, though that too is in dire need of work - right now it basically duplicates O'Higgins (surname). +" I thought it might better fit as a first or second sentence because a statement about the mission of the organization strikes me as more of a topic sentence for a paragraph than a supporting sentence. It seemed to better fit the first paragraph as on my reading the second paragraph seems to summarize biographical information while the first paragraph defines the group and its reason for notability. However I can see it as a topic sentence of the second paragraph with something like: The SPLC describes its mission as ""fighting hate and bigotry, and to seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of society."" or maybe you can show a draft of the variant you had in mind? 218.186.8.245 " +" Indeed, that was a terrible review. Ugh, I hate it when we have users doing that. I would re-review it myself but I won't have time to do so until thursday maybe. If you are willing to wait, I'd lovely do it. In the meantime, however, you can post at WT:GAN, because I don't want more of those reviews out there. I forgot we were on Backlog Drive time. — 21 " +One of the Wikilinks is an WP:EGG. — (talk) +with Greek people or Greek lands +" How could it be affirmed that the majority of the public know the names from the Funimation broadcast? Is there any source stating that? Even if that were true, Dragon Ball is known in almost all the English-speaking world, not only in the US. And that's not including the rest of the world. More importantly, the manga is the primary work, and normally the main source for most information regarding a work of fiction it's the printed work, like most American comic-book characters like Superman, Batman, Wolverine, etc. These are the key phrases to decide what names to use: WP:ENGLISH ""Use the most commonly used English version of the name of the subject as the title of the article, as you would find it in verifiable reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works)."" I honestly don't think that reliable sources will be found about this topic, at least not like encyclopedias and reference works, which leaves us with the following policy. WP:MOS-AM ""Characters should be identified by the names used in the official English releases of the series. If there are multiple English releases, such as both a manga and anime, use the one that is best known and that has contributed most to the work's becoming known in the English-speaking world (usually the primary work)."" This is the key one. We have to decide which one has contributed more to Dragon Ball becoming known in the English-speaking world. In my opinion, it was the manga, since Dragon Ball has been known for a very long time thanks to it, and, in the US, the first broadcasts of the anime where unsuccessful while the manga was already a success, and I have the impression that it was this success with the manga that lead Funimation to keep on trying. But again, this is not definitive. We need the opinions of people from other English-speaking countries in order to have a more accurate perception. If we want accuracy, which is also desirable by other Wikipedia policies, we should use the romanizations given by the author (Toriyama) in his Japanese works and then include the alternatives as stated in WP:ENGLISH. After all, most guidelines aren't meant to be a strict rule. But for the moment, first we have to define which one, manga or anime, helped more in making Dragon Ball known in the English-speaking world. And remember, US TV is not the whole English-speaking world. And if we go by the primary work, it's manga. " +"Here is the only thing I can find regarding use of images on a page (though this is not directed towards user pages): ""5. Images that are unused, obsolete, violate fair-use policy, or are unencyclopedic."" ...as a grounds for deletion. However, my page clearly says a ""definition"" in pictures. It is meant to be ""encyclopedic,"" the images are being used to demonstrate information (about me), and they are not in violation as far as I can tell of fair-use policy. As well, the deletion policy says, ""Pages that can be improved should be edited or tagged, not nominated for deletion,"" showing that this page should not have been nominated for deletion as it can be improvedand I will work towards that later today. Thank you. I cannot find a guideline that prohibits the use of photographs, much less a ""personal photo album,"" on user pages. Indeed, the photographs here are not a personal photo album. So, unless I can come across such a guideline I will leave those pictures. Any objections? Thanks. " +to be honest? nope +"Cut the crap already. Unless you're a pedophile, you don't have anything to worry about. And even then, all you have to do is stay quite about it and you'll be fine. On Wikipedia, we are focused on creating and maintaining an encyclopedia, not a social networking profile. If racists, pedophiles, murderers, thieves or prostitutes find the need to announce themselves as such, then they are at the wrong place. Stop looking at the policy as ""Block on sight"" and instead look at it as ""Don't disclose controversial information about yourself or otherwise you'll be blocked."" I think that if you look at it that way, it sounds perfectly fair. Its fair because this is an encyclopedia and there is no need to disclose that kind of information anywhere. back ☎ " +So If I delete that paragraph, will I save the page? +" Oh...    now I get it! Thanks Uncle Ed!! We just have to  k n o w   o u r   p l a c e. If an administrator attacks or commits libel against a lowly editor, we just have to grin and bear it. Could you tell me what your link to ""legal threats"" is supposed to show? While you're at it, how many administrators making personal remarks about me did you block? " +" Phoenix Hey, please to meet you. Thanks for your work on Phoenix. I am not very good in using the file in wikipedia. Can you help me to upload the art cover of their album ""it's never been like that"", please ? I really do not know how to, and you did a great job on their last art cover. i just want to complete their record cover gallery. thx a lot ! 212.234.114.244 Xaviateur" +":::That was very helpful, thank you. I see that and have already intervened very speedily and very effectively so good order is now restored.  talk " +You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia. You can still read pages, but you cannot edit, change, or create them. Editing from 88.96.108.118 has been disabled by Dominic for the following reason(s): CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively. This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse. In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions. Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Users: If you already have an account in good standing, you may request IP block exemption to bypass this block. Post an unblock request to your user talk page. This block has been set to expire: 21:41, 3 April 2010. Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and contact other editors and administrators by e-mail. Note: Please use the [show] links across from each header to show more information. +Yeah, go cheer up Montana. She may feel low, she found people talking behind her back, I gather. And I'm gathering they didn't notify her of the discussion. +Don't need direct quotes. Got sources who attribute it to Z.G., and have added info from his son claiming he never used the term. As to sections, they are now separated. Concerns addressed Dialogue Stalk me +Prokaryotes There's >2700 species in humans. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00293-5  | T@lk +Robert Walker You were patient on Robert Walker's talk page and tried to be sympathetic to an editor whom you thought was still learning how to use talk pages. Patience and sympathy are virtues, but he isn't an inexperienced editor who is learning. He is an editor with a history of excessively long posts to talk pages, who has in the past been taken to ANI for his talk page behavior. I don't think that he is interested in working on a non-controversial article to learn. He decides what he wants to work on; he isn't working to learn because he is working to express his views. I have tried to help him learn in the past, and he hasn't benefited from learning. Thank you for trying. +" Well, I said I am flexible, but I think you are way out of line with the article. For a long time the article stood on its legs because I, as Entwistle's biographer (the book is on its way), VERIFIED the sources. For example (and I'm only going to give two for now), you deleted the entry mentioning her signing the RKO contract on June 13....I HAVE THE CONTRACT IN FRONT OF ME! I'd be happy to send you a scan of it. At the top it says, ""This agreement made this 13th Day of June, 1932, between RKO Studios and Peg Entwistle."" It is signed by Entwistle, David O. Selznick, and Daniel L. Oshea, Selnick's Assistant Secretary. Then you added that Entwistle played in bit parts in several films (I'm paraphrasing), and referenced a source. But this claim of bit parts in other films proved to be untrue when I researched the entire body of RKO's inter-office memos at the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences archives in the Herrick Library in Beverly Hills. (I have copies of all the Selznick and Cukor memos regarding ""Thirteen Women,"" and other possible Peg Entwistle-related projects (such as discussions regarding Billie Burke wanting Peg instead of Katherine Hepburn in ""Bill of Divorcement."" (Would you like to see them, too?) I can go on and on with your deletionswhich, in my opinion, have a somewhat thinly-veiled personal bent. Clearly, you have no idea what you are talking about with regard to much of what you ""tweaked."" I understand editing for flow and NPOV, but your scalpel became a chainsaw to an article, though far from perfect, was quite acceptable to long-time Wiki editors and other administrators. I tried to be polite and respectful and reasonable, but it turns out that you are entirely unwilling to discuss anything with regard my expertise into the career and life and death of Peg Entwistle before ""tweaking"" her Wiki. Entwistle's familynamely her brother Milton Entwistle and his daughterfurnished me with hundreds of documents including diaries, letters, and telegrams. Before I met them I spent 5 years researching her careerliterally reading the era's newspapers and theatrical-related periodicals a page at a time. I spent hundreds of hours doing interviews. I found Entwistle doing radio in 1925, having lunch at the White House in 1931, being black mailed, and a dozen other things no onenot even her family had known. And because of her family's cooperation, I was able to complete a timeline that other authors had never before been able to string together. EVERYTHING I discovered has at least two verifiable, reliable sources. Wiki editors Rossrs, and Wildhartlivie, and I spent weeks ""tweaking"" the Entwistle articleit wasn't perfect, but it was good enough for them and so it remained good enough for Wikipedia until you came along and decided you knew more about her than her biographer. How ironic that a Wikipedia Administrator, in trying to establish a foothold of ""one-up-menship"" into a long-accepted Wikipedia article, actually deleted facts and added untruthsI'm sure you're quite satisfied with yourself. " +Do not be a vandal to the Malta page. Or I will report you to wikipedia! +" Template: DYK Mark, you added a comment about not using the ""|right"" image markup, this conflicts with the rules. Could you clarify the rules, or your comment, and maybe state why? 22:47, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)" +" Mysterious duality Hi r.e.b., Mysterious duality is in immediate danger of being deleted without more references that substantially address the topic. I was hoping you might have better luck with this than I did. Happy editing, " +" Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. -→™/?! " +Alright, well do us all a favor. FUCK OFF! No one wants to read these articles and see that citation bullshit all over the page. That stuff has been there for years and no one gave a rats ass until now. Seriously dude, fuck off. +" Boba Phat at AFD again An AFD you participated in 6 months ago, is being done again. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boba_Phat_(2nd_nomination) ''' " +Thanks! Your move of HDMS Gunnar Thorson (A560) works for me. I see you fleshed it out from stub status. That was quick. Cheers! +" ""out of control"" in Economics A quick comment, S. I'm probably not the one to comment on your TP comment as to Economics, but I do agree that your blank-slate approach to reading & tweaking the article is very appropriate. If you'd be interested I'd like to recruit you as reviewer/Editor on the concern you raised at some time in the foreseeable future. Nothing limits you in the meanwhile of course. I'll put this page on my watchlist for any response. " +" January 2009 Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Israel–Pakistan relations. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +" Hey Cirt I somehow got confused with the WP:RM page because it's not as it used to be back then when I used to visit frequently. As you are directly involved with films, could you please move the Three Idiots film article to 3 Idiots (that's its actual/official title)? Thanks. • Talk2me " +" Instead of seeking refs from the curent 146 google mentions of the organization, he nominated the American Gaming Association article for deletion. He's gone even further over the edge than the eight previous times he has been banned. There is obviously no ""coincidence"" in these nominations, but the nuisance of these actions to so many editors should not be allowed to exist. " +My talk page is not your playground. First, stop threatening me, and secondly, stop restoring your threats that I have removed from my talk page. Talk +Thank you Thank you for your help with my recent administrative request. And thank you for taking time out of your busy day to help make the wiki project better for everyone. +I am a typical Democrat. I stand for social and economic justice. You guys apparently do not. Rather, you stand for the sockputtery of basically, why do you hate Jesus and believe the Ten Commandents are errant? I acutually object to adultery, but you as Republicans are dedicated to sock-pupptery, and sleeping-around is your version of Good-By-Jesus. Shall I call you a homosexual slut? Clearly, you belive adultery is a good wiki thing. +" ""Also, in the Japanese version, the dolls in the Tower of Dolls spoke random creepy Japanese (""yamete!"" which means ""stop!"", amongst others.) These were hacked out of the American release for no good reason."" From The Castlevania Dungeon. Here. " +My bad Everything on here is so confusing >_< +Nonsense? kiss off, geek. what I said is true. I'll have your account terminated. +Slim Virgin You are a mindless, stupid asshole, and are hooked on a power kick. You are also, sadly, neither slim nor a virgin. +"::::I repeat that the notability of the NC is due to a TV series, and hence a ""specialist review"" would be the opinion of a professional television critic. (𒁳) " +RfC on User:Cenwin88lee's conduct Hello, An RfC has been initiated to discuss 's recent conduct. I invite all interested editors to come give their input at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cenwin88lee. Thanks! +" That old mole Aaaghh... every time I think I find a temporary quiet, the anti-Churchill vandals come back. The latest is ×talk " +March 2007 (UTC) The problem is you keep adding images that are copyrighted and way too large. I will keep fixing the images that you add that shouldn't be there. 14:03, 19 +Regarding the colors, I've just added color as 'deep purple' and I don't want to be erased as someone trying to be funny, but look at the picture on the swedish side. If that isn't deep purple then I don't know what is. +" Re: You got me here Yeah, that was indeed funny. I'm not from an English-speaking country, so at first I thought ""that's a very strange name, indeed"", but I figured it out almost immediately upon clicking the link. I forgot to introduce myself, I'm doing a GA review of DKP and I've currently placed the article on hold due to a few minor things that have to be sorted out. " +" Good job With our first wiki assignment, but there are more. Please don't forget about our wiki assignment deadlines. | talk " +Be nice if someone (Dutch) could organise this. There appear to be 3 categories of days, as described: public holidays with mandatory time off work; public holidays without mandatory time off work; and commonly marked days which are not public holidays. ...Although it's curious how something can be considered a public holiday if it doesn't involve some sort of legislated time off... The table really needs extra columns to suit. I'd do it myself but I fear making the article less accurate. +" is it so that ""reliable sources"" only mean American Media ???????, Indian news papers call Masood azhar as terrorist too, he is responsible for killind hundreds of hindus and indian soldiers, do you mean that life of a hindi is less valuable than that of a jewish or christian person ???? " +":::One more thing, while the article title matches with those of the naming conventions, moving ""Sultan Iskandar of Johor"" alone would break the pattern of naming in Category:Monarchs of Malaysia as most articles begin with ""Sultan"" here. Unless a mass move is initiated, there could be chances whereby unwitting users may revert back to the old namethis is possible especially if they are not well informed and would generally infer from what they see at first sight. " +" You have a foreign terminology. A NAP consistent libertarian society has no reason to call its membership fees ""taxes"" or to call its acting to NAP ""state"". You are confused. " +go fuck your mother faggot +I find it productive, and not harmful, to note anyone using his logged out IP to avoid culpability for going against the requests of the moderator, to create an appearance of consensus and/or to evade WP:3RR. I therefore request that my comments be addressed, not deleted. Policy requires honoring that request. 99.25.218.227 +Thank you Betacommand. Much obliged. +Do NOT GET RID OF THIS BOT! I LOVE IT! Hear, hear. Come here. Good bot. ALL YOU OTHER IDIOTS THAT SAY THAT THIS BOT IS A JERK, GO AWAY! +See the changes first, you piece of shit and don't meddle into things that don't concern you. All of the templates were placed to provoke. We don't need a citation to prove that Twelvers are the majority current in Shia Islam just as we don't need a citation to prove that the pope is the head of the Roman Catholic Church. We also don't need a reference to prove that Iran is a Shi'a country. This is a fucking widely known fact. Also, unless you didn't notice, a very large paragraph about Ismaili beliefs does not belong in the article. So, please, let me do my job and fuck off. +Bateman's Principle article edits I discussed the need for edits to this article on the article Talk page, here. And I noted the rationale for each edit that I made, as noted on the History page. I agree with you, the referencing of some of the sources needs to be changed from essay style to WP style I will try to get to that soon. +", 4 October 2015 (UTC) Oppose There is no evidence of any controversy a controversy is a public disagreement or dispute. We haven't cited anything that's under dispute; rather the government regulators, VW, and the reputable media all agree on the facts here. The only controversy is here on Wikipedia. Volkswagen emissions scandal is an accurate title with broad support. If it becomes necessary in the future to have more articles about other VW emissions scandals, we can disambiguate them by adding ""diesel"" or ""zero point energy"" or whatever it is to the title, but right now, per WP:PRECISION, that isn't needed. 18:24" +It seems to be similar to many other musician pages on Wikipedia. It seems to give general information. Since most of what the public knows about musicians is their type of music and maybe a little bio, this seems ok. +" Regular? You seem to misunderstand WP:DTTR; in the context of WP:DTTR the word ""regular"" is used to describe someone who is an experienced user. You are clearly not a regular. If I can find some free time I'll write a request for your mentor to implement some additional restrictions. I checked a random sample of your edits and you make lots of mistakes. " +You're just a stupid, arrogant prick, you know that? I'm sick of your snot-nosed attitude, I'm sick of your smart-ass comments, I'm just plain sick of you. +A god-being told me that knotweed is the key to transcendence, that it is the bridge to the ultimate knowledge +Thank you. Nposs, Thanks for clarifying appropriate links for me. I think I get it now. MsAriel +. this was my apology note from before I apologize to both Eeekster and Bilcat for this edit war I had no intention of being anything like a moron art all I just being I bit upset with some of my conflicts over the last few months. I see that I did wrong and I will stop these disruptions and will try very hard to be a great wikipedia editor in everyday. I guarantee never to edit war from now on. Whitmore 8621Whitmore 8621 (talk) , +English and chronoligal order of Rencontres d'Arles article Hi. Regarding your recent additions to Rencontres d'Arles where you added extensive lists of people. I removed them because your text is in French and the lists are not in chronological order. Please add them back again but in chronological order, and with English text, thanks. - +" British nationality law and the Republic of Ireland Hello, Love, I don't know if you are still in the States ... but, anyway, there is a highly problematic article, and I think that I might be being subjected to certain amount of harassment because it is a somewhat borderline-Emerald-Isle-related-article (British nationality law and the Republic of Ireland). Mad, isn't it?! Perhaps, the author of ""Mad Dogs and Englishmen"" might originally in fact had the Gaels in mind, well, who knows?! Great craic, it certainly isn't! WP:DENY as best as I can, of course! -Ta-ra! - " +@ Fine! Just get me out of here and let me be with Anime News Network and some of IMDb where I can find better cool guys and not ones that picky and snobbish like you. New Jersey sucks! +. An ‘nomination’ from User:Bishonen (oh yes) of User:Charles Matthews, who has previously been accused by at least two users of vandalism of the article in question due to incompetence of the subject, as a writer of a replacement article on Erich Heller for Wikipedia, puts User:Bishonen’s intentions vis-à-vis Wikipedia’s best interests in some doubt, adding to the tangle of contradictions discernible in the two administrators’ conduct +Er, what is this page doing here? As much as I'm interested in AP, this page was deleted and redirected to Notable Usenet Personalities (as we all know). Now, I didn't vote in favor of deletion, but recreating this page just doesn't seem particularly kosher to me. What new justification has been found? +Hi TK You, Terry Koeckritz, are a colossal tit. But of course, that's not really your name is it? Thats why you go round trying to hush it up. YOU AREN'T FOOLING ANYONE!!!!! n00b!!!!!!!!one!11 +August 2005 (UTC) Fuck you guys. I had to look up what you mean by sockpuppet, and I assure you I have never met those two awesome dudes in my life. Maybe you need to accept that more and more people know Aquman is an cocksucker. By the way, I don't shove my fist up anyone's ass but my girlfriend's. Thank you very much. 05:40, 18 +Queen The recent cite added to drive Queen as having sold 150 million, as opposed to 300, is an agenda driven edit by +Sorry, I didn't mean to sound too blunt there. I appreciate your perspective, and you're right that Mem's comments about day care having nothing to do with this, but the fact remains that this is a major part of her biography. (58.160.168.215 ) +Should we merge this with AMD Zodiac or should we keep two pages - one for the Canadian version and one for the US version? Please discuss. +Afghanistan It is too soon to add the War in Afghanistan to the list? As it fits Stowell's definition perfectly. - 58.106.46.227 +" How to Get a Life 1. Get off Wikipedia. 2. Get popular. Start with a goal like, ""I'll get 2 friends by 2069."" 3. Get a girlfriend. 4. If all else fails, buy a hand gun. 5. S h o o t. Repeat if necessary." +Propaganda platform Wikipedia They want to keep Syriac people as a redirect to the Assyrian people article! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_December_19 +hero's like yourself +", a modest amount of ""good material"" is the norm." +Comment on this IP address. You left a message on the talk page for this IP address, I was wondering if you had the means to block this IP from editing wikipedia articles. This is a school in Canberra Australia and I have encountered many instances of students vandalising Wikipedia. It would be better for the community and the students if we were unable to edit pages. Thank you. +" Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2014 Zendaya's official site states that her name derives from the word, ""Tendayi,"" meaning ""give thanks"" in Shona (a Bantu language native to the Shona people of Zimbabwe). She also spent three years dancing with her former dance group called Future Shock Oakland. They danced such dances as Hip Hop and Hula " +Wikipedia is too serious an encyclopedia to accommodate your ignorance. +You and everyone deleting the 8 Prime Spirals are all LIARS the original article was CITED it cited peer level speed tests of all the top prime algorithms. Yet you twits claim not verified. BS. I VERIFIED MY CLAIMS. This is why the world of Academia considers wiki to be run by clueless power hungry twit mods that know nothing about academia. READ THE CITES IN THE ARTICLE YOU TWITS DELETED I shouldn't even be wasting my breath on such nazi censoring worms. PUT THE PAGE BACK it was citd to GITHUB speed tests. The new Prime Spirals beat all the other prime algorithms, and wiki has pages for the slower prime algorithms. PUT IT BACK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals GITHUB is where the tests were done and not one real mathematician or computer programming expert question the results since anyone can duplicate them from the open source software. https://github.com/evandrix/Splat/tree/master/code/demo/pyprimes-0.1.1a/pyprimes-tests https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2011-December/087209.html So the original article CITED major outside sources to PROVE THE CLAIMS drprinceton +" This claim is, per se-sick. No wonder you guys spill your venom on wiki, or your ""Armies"" fled, whenever stumbling upon even slightly armed adversary during 1991-1995 wars- frightened by images of your own propaganda on diabolical, bloodthirsthy Croats in black shirts who enjoy licking blood of Serbian children and cut throats just for fun. You live entrapped in your own perverted mind. " +" Bullshit. I have never done so, and you have zero diffs to show that. I challenge you to even make a correct guess as to my political leanings. This is getting rediculous. 32 " +Mind your business +with regards and due respect to your recent thoughtful epistle Shove it all the way up your ass +" pic of him Well thank god someone has put one there. I'm not sure it will stick in copyright terms, but it certainly lifts the article and is important for the readers' understanding. I have had no success in getting the ABC or the Australian National Library to release or locate a copyright-free image of the man. The ABC, which runs the most comprehensive site on White, said fine, if an annual fee is paid (I'm not paying out of my own pocket). It's extraordinary that national cultural institutions are so unwilling to assist, given White's importance to Australian culture. (talk) " +" Thank you so much, Abstrakt, this is very helpful! I sometimes take entire months off, so don't worry for taking a few days to respond. And yes you're right, the Shunzhi Emperor is referred to as ""šidzu eldembure hūwangdi"" in Manchu documents written after his death, just like he is named Shizu 世祖 in equivalent Chinese documents. These are the emperor's temple names. But I've seen a few Shunzhi-era documents in Manchu, and the date is marked as ""ijishūn dasan, Xth year, Xth month, etc."" Since the Wiki conventionally use reign names to refer to Ming and Qing emperors, ""ijishūn dasan"" should be good. I also find that form more interesting than ""šidzu eldembure hūwangdi,"" which after all is a transcription from the Chinese (""šidzu"" = Shizu 世祖) followed by a generic title that applies to all Manchu emperors! Thank you again for the help! Cheers, " +REDIRECT User talk:Sciencewatcher/Archive 1 +" User talk:Skier Dude2 User talk:Skier Dude Well, i added these two posts on topic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_China_%E2%80%93_Pakistan_relations . I don't know how to license an image. Could you please guide me in this regard. Add these three images on that article. These images are present and drawn from Pakistan Post Official Website.... Also, I want to add some image on my college page Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore. Guide me how to add license codes on those images which i snapped by myself. Because whenever i add some image on page which i wrote mostly, some person add tag of speedy delete with it. I am doctor, and want to help in medical topics. I love to, but confusing policies of wikipedia forcing me to quite this channel ;( could you please please please guide me. I could give support from college authorities in all forms, because i heard that wikipedia support mailing services as well. So it would be nice of you if you guide me in at least these fronts of image licensing. It would be great full of you. i asked couple of guys before, but they are just authoritative not cooperative, killing purpose of wikipedia of ""Sharing Portal""" +" Oh, see I didnt know cant delete pages, I mean how am I to blame when a message shows up that says ""you cant have this""? It made me mad, and it was signed by danski so who doI I go after? danski of course. And I appologize for my personal attacks, it was out of hand and very immature. " +"Support as is obvious by talk page discussions. The country China, whose article is at People's Republic of China, is the most obvious and most common usage of the word China to an international english-reading general interest audience. We give undue weight to consider the claims made by opponents of a 60 year old war that still, though inconsistently, claim to be ""the real China"". " +Your VFD vote on OurColony I ask you to reconsider. Ourcolony was not created to circumvent the vote on OurColony.net but infact was created 2 days prior to your VfD submission. Check the history of the two sites and see for yourself. Ourcolony history 07:16 (UTC) on Monday, April 11 2005 +. This is a movement which within this decade proclaimed that ANY LIE is good if it helps to achieve the long-term political goals +You don't decide what goes on my userpage. Don't vandalize it again. +" I don't think any of the ""personal attacks"" are very serious - they reflect my genuine belief as to the motivation and tactics of Domer48 and are borne out of frustration at the stranglehold he has achieved on several articles, where he is able to act as ""guardian"" and cleverly revert all edits with which he disagrees while adeptly staying within the letter of various WP guidelines. Sure, I'm not as clever as him, and equally it is not in my nature to ""tell the teacher"", and therefore end up with punishments such as this. " +" Thanks Love! We've got some really good reviews so far from a couple of other guys, but all the eyes that are cast upon the article at PR make its chance of passing FAC so much better. Thanks heaps! vu " +" Evil Dead Series Hello, welcome, all that good stuff. I like what you're doing with the Evil Dead series - good idea! (talk) " +Oh yes, you must ban me. Very much you must. If you don't, you might have a useful encyclopaedia that works towards providing facts. We wouldn't want that now, would we? +WikiProject Social Work I notice you have contributed to the article Social work. I have created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Social Work. I have begun to work on this project and I would love to have your help. Please take a look at it and consider joining the project. Many thanks, (talk) +First I want to mention that I deeply appreciate your candid, frank, and friendly response. It is refreshing to meet another Wikipedian who doesn't see any need to bite someone's head off just because of a mistake, whatever the size. Not that most Wikipedians do that, but cordiality is still nice. Yes, I agree that I should resist the urge to correct other people's comments. For me, the ill will is a much bigger factor, especially because I always try to be very careful to never change the meaning of a comment, but it is still a risk, as you say. You're right, the edits are old and the link eventually gets you there. These are trivial changes, but I find value in them. It is true that the servers don't spend much time on redirects, but I still would like all links going directly to the article they refer to. Not that that will ever happen to all of WP, or even EN WP, but I can help. Actually, I started fixing the redirecting links to that particular page because I wanted to make sure there were no double redirects, which would be a problem, and one worth fixing. Being a perfectionist, I decided to go ahead and fix all the redirecting links instead of just the double redirects (I want a nice, clean Whatlinkshere page, with no indentions ). A large percentage of the redirects I am fixing are on (main) namespace pages, not on talk pages, and in those cases I also fix the visible spelling of the link when it is wrong, since that should be right. So I am doing what you were saying about fixing the article pages. On talk pages (and even in archives), I have been fixing the appearance as well as the link target, but I think I'll change my policy based on your well-made point: I'm only going to change the link target, nothing about the appearance. Does that seem reasonable? I am interested in AWB, but I haven't really looked into it much. Thanks for the tip. My login problem is a toughie, as far as I can tell. What happens is this: I click the register/login link at the top right of the page. I enter my username and password. It says I have successfully logged in, and even shows my username, etc., in the upper right. But then, as soon as I switch to another page, I am logged out again. I have checked my cookies, and I am accepting cookies from all Wikimedia projects that I'm working on. It is possible it is a firewall problem, but I have no idea how to fix that. And it isn't just at the school where I work: I can't login on computers in cybercafes in the area either. Maybe they all have the same type of firewall or something, but I never had this problem until around December 2006, which was about the time our school changed its ISP. I don't know if that is related, but if that is the case, it seems strange that I can't even login when I'm off-campus. A bit of a puzzler, isn't it? BTW, if you don't mind me saying so, I noticed that your contribs link in your signature doesn't go to your contributions page. The link should read [[Special:Contributions/Flex]], not [[Special:Contributions:Flex]]. Better to catch it now than later. |talk +JfdWolff is a hopeless failure . . . He can't stomach defeat !!! JFDWOLFF IS A TOTAL LOSER !!! +But how does that count? Isn't there something on Wikipedia that says the 3RR rules does nOt apply to cases of obvious vandalism? I am pretty sure there is cuz when I googled that term lots of stuff came up with ppl saying that 3RR does not apply to valdalis. That dude created a single purpose account that was only made to remove stuff from her article. Correct? If someone goes on a page and fills it with profanities and the n-word and I keep reverting it, that isn;t covered by 3RR, right? My thoughts anyways. +Some miscellaneous stuff== There was this picture on his burial... It said he was buried next to his son Brandon's grave... I think there was something wrong with the structure of the sentence. He died before his son didn't he? So shouldn't it be his son was buried next to him, not he was buried next to his son's grave, cuz it kindof brings out the sequence of events, which is kindof awkward... == +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Phil Roy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. The MoMK article could certainly use a fresh set of eyes or two, so I hope you stick around. +After Bismarck Looking at the fact, that the period of time the first paragraph talks about is approximately 24 years long, longer than the time Bismarck was in charge, I doubt whether it is said enough about this period. My English is relatively bad, so I won’t do it myself. But here are some important issues: The militarism the article talks about as implemented by the emperor was a social phenomenon, about which later (Weimar) politicians said, that it was one reason for WW I. Because of this all Germans were guilty for forcing the war and had to accept their responsibility. In the article it looks like the population didn’t support the militarism. It was just the other war around. Bismarck’s policy of a “satuierter Staat” (satisfied Country) was not strongly supported by the Germans. Also the sentence “Ein Platz an der Sonne” (a place at the Sun) should be mentioned. It stands for the German demand for colonies. Also Wilhelm II’s fleet policy should be mentioned. The german fleet was heavily expanded, which made the British Empire look at Germany anxiously. “Politik der freien Hand”) Also some of Wilhelm II’s unpredictable and foolish acts (for example during the second morocco-crisis (“Panthersprung nach Agadir”) or as he wrote the “Krüger Depesche” to congratulate Paul Kruger for fighting down a riot of British settlers, which was forced by the British government) should be placed here. Also a link to the Fashoda-crisis and its solution and the Entente Cordiale or the Triple Entente should be amended, as they were referred as a surrounding of Germany by enemies (“Umringt von Feinden”). Another matter is, that it is not clear whether Bismarck himself would have been able to keep up his system of treaties for a longer period of time, because of it’s complexity. Some historians believe, that this system had to lead to a new European war, it only was the question, when. I hope that an English-speaking person will read this and will take him- or herself some time to think of the things I tried to point out. Indeed it is necessary, as the history part of the Germany article is let’s say … short. They are not even mentioning the Rhine confederation. Mit freundlichem Gruße +" Actually, I was on your side until you took that tone with me. I was only trying to say that while there might have been an accidental change in the word (and no one ever said it was accidental... they probably did it on purpose), doesn't mean that they ""butchered"" the laguage. I only used that term because it was used before. People who use foreign words are bound to say one incorrectly. I wasn't saying that is what her parents did, I was just saying in general. And I didn't mean that you were freaks, I just meant that it was absurd to be fighting over this issue. People name their children a lot worse. It was my mistake for offending you. But what do I know? I'm just a Dark Lord. 6 July 2005 21:31 (UTC)" +" DRN for Khojaly infobox Hello, you participated in the discussions on the talk page of the Khojaly massacre article. was attempting to change the estimated number of casualties in the infobox by using a speculative figure guessed by a member of HRW in the pertinent documents on a footnote on page 24. I believe everyone in the discussion besides Grandmaster agreed that the infobox should remain as is, without the speculative figure (especially since it is already in the body of the article). Please join us at ""Talk:Khojaly Massacre#Number_of_civilians_affected"" to help facilitate a resolution. Thank you. " +How much abuse? How much abuse and foul language do I have to put up with, whilst administrators excuse and justify the other editors contact? Yet you criticise me for the most minor insult 'smart alec' +No one is stopping you from using reliable sources to contest the viewpoints of the numerous scholars who describe the process as 'Judaization'. Find them read them, edit them in. No one owns this page. It's a democracy (to some extent). +" Whit Babcock Hey, I see you deleted this page. I have warned who has created the article several times regarding the copyright violation. I have also recently warned about recreating the page. I'm not sure who created the one you deleted but action may be needed. I'd say to salt the article (ask) but I think the subject may be notable so salting may deter someone else from writing a quality article. ''''''[[User_talk:OlYeller21|Talktome]] " +Holy smokers, I wish my preference to be adopted. But, a group of editors who are continuing to cry 'foul' over the Final Poll (because the 'F option' is leading) are hurting its chances. They think they're helping things, but they're not. +Women bus drivers Thoughts? I don't like them. What about you? Do you think it's right they should drive buses; or do you think they should stick to washing up? 164.39.151.107 +" If you have a proper reference regarding the accuracy potential of the M24 in a .300 Win. Mag. chambering please provide that web link. As far as I could read there is a solicitation underway for rechambering M24 rifles and I could not read anything about accuracy requirements, though one might suspect these rifles will not be exceptionally accurate since the M24 SWS is in essence an accurized or if you want to view things more critical a glorified Remington 700 hunting rifle. If you go on provided link https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode;=form&id;=0d5c4ebc69fbb9bd9f37b47f8b0e1cef&tab;=core&_cview=1 and download ""Amendment 1"" (going through ""Download Solicitation"" page, no direct link) then you will get document ""PURCHASE DESCRIPTION (15 January 2010 Revision) RIFLE, .300 WINCHESTER MAGNUM, SNIPER W/AY OPTICAL SIGHT AND CARRYING CASES, M24 RECONFIGURED"" where you can find ""Targeting and accuracy. The rifle shall achieve the dispersion set forth below when fired from a machine rest. The average mean diameter of shot groups fired with and without the sound suppressor attached shall be less than or equal to 1.15 inches at 100 meters (1 MOA) (T), 0.92 inches at 100 meters (0.8 MOA) (O). The minimum rate of fire for conducting this test shall be three rounds per minute."" This is really complicated ""work"". 69.141.140.192 " +" Thanks, but can Grawp be blocked on sight for ban evasion, and is WP:AIV the best method to notify an admin about the offender?   — " +" First rule is consider everything GOOD FAITH, before you butcher it. If you can not conclusively prove that a specific source is NOT a reliable suorce then leave it in there. I have seen your reverts of others work where you left very RUDE remarks (nonsense, etc). Tone it down, do not misuse admin authority somehow you have unfortunately ended you. You seem to excel at use of WP templates, warning, etc which lot of editors don't and you tend to misuse those in destructive manner to throw other editors off WP, make them lose interest, I saw you on Suraj Mal page your edit wars with others, later it was resolved when someone with better judgment allowed others edit after silencing you but seems you came back after few months and reverted those ""accepted"" edits, that is very negative tactic of attrition. I was highly disgusted with your approach towards others. Also, you seems to carry a PERSONAL UNFOUNDED BIAS against certain sources. Make yourself USEFUL at WP, improve articles, DO NOT MASS BUTCHER others edits. Instead of increasing you edit counts but butcher, butcher, butcher and leaving arrogant rude comments, better pick very few pages and improve those. BE productive, not destructive. It takes lot more effort to create than to destroy/butcher. Anyone can be a butcher, specially with inflated ego, arrogant attitude and unworthy authority. It takes lot more to be a constructive leader. Be a useful WP admin who leaves a POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT behind, please do not be WP DESTRUCTIVE TALIBAN BULLY. Leave Dhillon and Jat pages alone. Better leave WP alone. Get a job. good luck. JATs ...it. " +" Wrong: Jeffers' travels were extensive. Read Jim Karman's book Robinson Jeffers Poet of California. Also, he himself coined the term ""Inhumanism."" Jeffers was most certainly an environmentalist. Do a bit of homework." +actually this is the largest forum in Urdu language and is popular in Urdu community, my English isn't good so i didn't write much but someone else can expand this article with better understanding of English. +Barnstar You've done alot of work on alot of WoT articles since you joined up, and I thought you deserved some recognition for it. Keep up the good work!! +I haven't looked in the broader media yet but within the higher ed media here is some coverage: FIRE, Inside Higher Ed, and The Chronicle of Higher Education. +" List of isms Banno, do you want to rethink the 'list of isms'. Of course, there are some silly ones (""cosmothetic idealism""). But some isms correspond to divisions that are relevant across the whole history of philosophy. 1. Rationalism vs Empiricism, which begins with Parmenides and continues until today. 2. Nominalism vs Realism, which begins with Aristotle, becomes the central question of the Middle Ages via Porphyry and Boethius, and is still alive today, very much so. 3. Idealism vs Realism, and understanding of which is essential to any understanding of the Early Modern period. Possibly Scepticism. They are not so much 'isms' (perhaps it was my fault for phrasing it that way. What is needed is a short list of the basic positions in which philosophers have been divided since the beginning of time. Yes? " +" Did it by hand ... is there a formal box available? (talk→  ←track) " +"You could care less about ""giberrish"" but guess what, nobody comes to wiki to get the schedule of an airline. Maybe you should reevaluate your motive and quit taking the easy way out by editing fleets and destinations, which are two issues that are minimal impact and are open to multiple sources (especially concerning fleets) " +" User_talk:76.203.4.84 Replied over there. BTW - when did I call ❤ " +You've had the required discussion with the deleting admin (ie: your humble narrator). And I'm not minded to undelete it. You know the ropes, and are no doubt well aware of Wikipedia:Deletion review and the other bureaucratic stuff. I'm not particularly fond of 'em either. It's fine by me if you re-start the article. Just add references this time round. Pete AU aka +REDIRECT Talk:XVII Brigade, Royal Horse Artillery +" According to Simon Schama's book The Power of Art, Guernica was painted in response to an article that Picaso saw in an French newspaper. The first line suggests that he was already working on the project when the bombs fell. He had agreed to do 'a politically minded painting' for a 1937 Paris Fair, but he had not decided what he was going to do until after the events in Geurnica unfolded. It was a front page photograph of the inferno that inspired the work. ""Quite possibly apocryphal"" I cut this from the article. A story, quite possibly apocryphal, circulates about Guernica. During World War II, a German officer sees a copy of the painting for the first time, in the presence of Picasso. In a wondering tone he asks Picasso ""Did you do this?"" and Picasso replies: ""No, you did."" If it is ""quite possibly apocryphal"" and we have no attribution or citation, it does not belong in the article. | Talk 02:33, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC) Except that this is extremely widely believed and noted. I recall hearing the equivalent when I was at the Prado. - 02:40, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC) Then someone should be able to find a citation at least of the anecdote being told. (& was Guernica ever in the Prado? In the early 80s it was in an annex to the Prado and then was moved to the Reina Sofia, no?) | Talk 07:32, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC) Duh, yeah that is what I meant to say. It has been 4 years since I was there. Yes, I would think someone could find a source for that being a common anecdote. - 13:32, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC) The most specific version I could find as that Picasso is supposed to have said this in 1937, replying to German ambassador Otto Abetz, as he was visiting Picasso's studio. Then there are versions that have Picasso handing out postcards (sometimes autographed, even) to Germans while making this quip, but the most popular is probably the one that uses an anonymous German officer bringing/seeing a postcard/photograph. None of these sites mention sources, of course, but this one has an interesting addition: Picasso himself probably had contributed to Barr's and others' perception of him having behaved rather boldly throughout the war when, immediately following the liberation, he told an American correspondent for Newsweek magazine that on the day when a German army officer had recognized a sketch of Guernica pinned to the wall of his studio and had asked him, ""Did you do that?,"" Picasso coldly had replied, ""No, you did."" Now the tale originates with Picasso himself and is told to Newsweek, which makes this version much more credible than the others, since it's hard to see how a response to Abetz or a group of officers would not be better documented, while it's equally hard to see how a reply to a single anonymous German officer could be known at all. Unfortunately, no other site corroborates the Newsweek detail. I've sent a mail to the Newsweek editors and I'll keep you posted. If someone could check out some Picasso biographies to check whether they mention the anecdote (and what source they give, if any), that would be great. 13:14, 2005 Apr 25 (UTC) We can certainly cite the fact that Picasso himself told a (possibly apocryphal) story. It makes the line his, even if it's not clear he really said it in the claimed circumstances. | Talk 16:05, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC) Yes, if Picasso really told it. So far, no sources are backing up that website (or even just repeating that version), so I'm not too keen on it. Otherwise the whole thing is just as apocryphal as before. · Talk 16:46, 2005 Apr 26 (UTC) If anyone is up for some library work: old Newsweeks are pretty easy to find. | Talk 06:31, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC) Nudity? I reverted this from Category:Paintings containing nudity to Category:Paintings. Clearly, the fact that one naked female human breast is visible in the painting is a very minor fact about the painting; no one by a very weird obsessive would look for it there. It is primarily a political work about war. I could make a case that it is a perfect illustration that nakedness is not always nudity, but I think it suffices to say +" We discussed this on the WP:VG talkpage, and I said it would probably end up being undue weight. If you want to gather the sources to prove me wrong, then that would be great. '''''' (Talk·Edits) " +It also was in the wrong section, which is about craigslist itself and not things that happen in the wider world that happen to involve craigslist. Overall, the consensus here seems to be that we don't want to make a list, in this article at least, of everything that happens on craigslist. +POV article The whole article is about whether Macedonians are Bulgarian or Macedonian, and has little to do with Misirkov's life. Can't we do a chronological history of the man's life instead of making the article into one about nationalism? +" My examples of other encyclopedias is proof that what Uber has done to this article is not an improvement but a type of WP:OR that does not follow scholarly consensus but rather subverts it. '''talk " +"::""happened 10 minutes ago"" Happened ten minutes ago where? On TV. TV IS MEDIA retard. " +" Wikipedia and copyright Hello Perrytrev, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Framlingham College has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks ("") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ""text"". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. " +" Kevin your systematic deletion and suppression of the multi level cosmology stinks of inquisition. Either you are too limited to open up your mind to other non-standard cosmologies, which, by the way, explain the universe much better than the ""classic"" cosmologies, or your behavior is motivated by extremist religious beliefs. This is cosmology, this is not religion, you should go publish your beliefs in the section on religion and you should stop vandalizing Wikipedia. It seems that you have nothing better to do than day and night look for any mention of the multi-level cosmology in Wikipedia and systematically deleting it. Yes, some time ago the entire article on multi-level cosmology was deleted, but I think the deletion was premature and was the result of the unorthodox explanations of the theory. So even though the full article has been deleted, there is no reason, in the interest of science, not to mention the multi-level cosmology in other sections, and let others decide whether or not it is valid. Censorship, inquisition and suppression of science is counterproductive and harms science. If you are so obsessed with censorship of Wikipedia, do you also censor the articles in Tampa Tribune? Is your motivation religious? Kevin please stop your personal obsession with deletion and suppression of the multi level cosmology and do something more productive." +My final statements in the discussion above show that I have been swayed by sources not listed here. +you fail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:The_Blizzard_King nicole atkins now has her own page loza +To User: Frau Holle I noticed that you split the long introduction of the Nonlinear programming page into several sub-sections, like Mathematical formulation of the problem and Methods for solving the problem, etc. But, some text which should have clearly been in Methods for solving the problem you left in the Mathematical formulation of the problem. I fixed that. Please let me know if you think I am wrong about the change. Thanks. User: Olegalexandrov +Nairs were in the Army as wells in other services.who used to cook in nambuthiri and rich nair household?so they worked as soldiers,servants,stewards,adminstrators and so on,many were in agricultre also as farm hands.Many contradictions are there in the article.Nairs are bunts who came from Tulu nadu.Bunts are classifies as a backward caste in karnataka but if you knew that then you wouldnt tell that origin!what is the fun of rejecting the sudra tag?you hate it? there ware times when prostitution was considered as a deginifed profession in kerala,this is reflected in the works of unnai warriar and venmony mahan.who were those prostitutes?carrying a prostitute on the shoulder of a man was considered as an honur during the times.times have changed. +" Thank you for pointing out my mistake, I've withdrawn the warning from your talk page. Sorry about that, " +Greville Well done on reverting Fulke Greville (disambiguation). We seem to have a NN descendant who is determined to put himslef in WP, having been removed some months ago. I remove a list of names from Fulke Greville, but thought we would just get into an edit war if he was removed from dabpages, which include the above. +Well, your special effort missed Joe Lieberman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman there is a section on controversies and criticisms, and he is a former candidate for VP and very possibly McCain's this year. I'm sure this is purely accidental though, and not bias on the part of editors. +"::::: No, ""one"" would not assume that knowledge about alcoholism is the same as or implies knowledge about Alcoholics Anonymous, and I'm not even sure that he qualifies and an ""eminent"" expert on alcoholism. I also see you followed or found the link I provided for you yesterday. Yes, like I said then, the Knol is very good, but like it is also self-published. Since it is non peer-reviewed it cannot be used to establish credibility as an expert on any topic. I have a life outside of Wikipedia and this edit warring and the exacting arguments to get self-published sources included in this article is really taking up more time than I can spend here. I'm taking this article back off my watch list you win the war of attrition. Congratulations on having the time and energy to spend all day on Wikipedia bikeshedding. You've successfully pushed your POV (to it's detriment), decreased the quality of the article, and again frustrated me passed my capacity to collaborate on this article. Have a nice day. " +You weren't supposed to post that yet you tard. 217.41.226.121 +considering this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, i respect the fact that sourcing is required for all claims. because if we just relied on common sense, then your common sense would clash with the next guy/girl's common sense, and so on. instead, let's just add things that have sources, because it's a rule, and it's a good rule. +ROH Roster Page Is there any particular reason why you specifically targeted all the pages I have helpfully contributed to? Seems like a personal vendetta to me. Please refer to Wikipedia's Assume Good Faith Edits and remain Civil. Thank you very much. +So sorry about the hex. Usually they don't take hold. +" I'm guessing you didn't read WP:FOOTYN, specifically, ""Have played for a fully professional club at a national level of the league structure (FPNL club). This must be supported by evidence from a reliable source on a club by club basis for teams playing in leagues that are not recognised as being fully professional."" I don't see any evidence that the ALbanian Supeliga is fully professional (emphasis on ""fully""). Plus, none of the articles you removed PRODs show ""significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject"". " +SupportHogbin's assertion is correct and its inclusion in this section is justified. It is supported by academic authority and research. It is generally accepted that victory in the BoB kept Britain in the war.''' +So are you suggesting that you should never be held accou8ntable for erroneous things you have said? Exactly who do you think you are? I dare say, Mary, you're not impressing anyone nearly so much as you impress yourself. +No problem; thanks for keeping an eye on it!  [talk] +I would like to counter this, with this a complete lie, and personal attack. He falsely stating I have manipulated articles. +Njgw? Your dead mummy ashes? +Thanks Joshua! Just a scratch at the surface. I also looked at the writings on your page. Pretty extensive work! Good job ) +" Ah, apologies that my response was not as helpful as I would've liked for it to have been. With regards to my previous editing habits, not much as changed. I work on similar (in lots of cases, the same) articles as I did previously. My primary article writing foci has shifted a bit, however, from sport to literature. With regards to admin actioning, I've never been hugely active, and hasn't changed much, either. My primary focus in that area is working with OTRS. With regards to views about Wikipedia, that encompasses a great deal, but I'd be happy to answer any specific questions. With regards to previous concerns about me in the past, I honestly cannot think of anything significant; I changed my username for reasons completely unrelated to anything controversial on Wikipedia. Upon writing this, I'm not sure that this is exactly what you're looking for, as I've offered these comments completely devoid of prior references and diffs and such, for reasons I'm sure you can understand (but not totally agree with, which is fine, of course). Also, as this discourse is probably not going to be read by any large portion of the community, I'm also not sure that I've helped out in that area, either. As such, I'd be more than happy to talk more, as it's sometimes quite difficult to communicate with great effectiveness in this format. gaillimhConas tá tú? " +Additions of http://.vintagecarart.nl Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam1 notices +" Hansi Brand DYK? Nomination Hello, I have just responded to your comments hereTemplate:Did you know nominations/Hansi Brandand addressed all of the concerns that you had in regards to this DYK? nomination. Please respond back to me whenever you are able to. Thank you very much. Hi, Futurist ... I'm sorry I didn't get back to this, but I see that all was resolved. Thanks for the quick and amicable resolution! (Talk) Pisco Sour Dear Sandy, I hope all is well. Pardon the abrupt question, but could you please provide an update on your views at the Pisco Sour FAC? Best regards. | Talk No. (Talk) Tyrannosaurus FA Hi Sandy, I was wondering if you would have a quick look at the Tyrannosaurus article and see if it looks to you to meet current FA standards? I am wondering whether to initiate a discussion on it with a view towards it needing an FA review as the text to me seems repetitive, handling of units hap-hazard and inconsistent, significant overlinking, and needing some reorganisation. I would welcome any thoughts you may have, and to be clear I am not asking that you take on the job, I just seek the view of an experienced FA contributor. Thanks. Hi, EdChem ... I'm sorry I have been of so little use in responding to your requests for help lately ! I've been quite busy in real life, so haven't had the time for the sustained commitment needed to review at the FA level, although I can occasionally dip in to DYK for a quick source review. (Will respond to Tony's DYK issue as soon as I can I'm more concerned about sourcing, padding, and copyvio issues than how interesting hooks are at DYK I think interesting hooks might be a concern if the basic pillars of Wikipedia were being met, and I'm concerned that DYK is still a place where not even basic pillars that apply to all articles are upheld.) When I was new to Wikipedia, dinosaur articles were all the rage; as often happens, it seems that many of the editors who maintained those articles have moved on. At a quick glance, I can see numerous problems (as you outlined, including uncited text) with the article, but those problems aren't as bad as many older FAs that typically appear at WP:FAR. It's not surprising that a high-profile topic like tyrannosaurus would deteriorate after its principle editors move on. Instructions at FAR ask that editors post to the talk page before initiating a review, in hopes that some interested editor will improve the article and remove the need for FAR. You cannot go wrong by listing some of the obvious issues on talk to see if anyone will surface to work on the article. If no one surfaces in say a month, I agree that the article probably needs to go to FAR. But there are so many FAs in so much worse shape ... I digress ) Best, (Talk) Cochrane Library Sign-up Have you seen Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Free_Research_Accounts_from_Leading_Medical_Publisher._Come_and_Sign_up.21? (Talk) Thank you so much for pointing me to that ... if that comes through, it will be immensely helpful to me ... much more so than HighBeam or Jstor, which have turned out to be not very useful for medical editing, although quite useful in other topic areas. I appreciate the pointer. (Talk) Correct link: Wikipedia:Cochrane. (Talk) Better late than never Hi Sandy - thanks for your email way back when. I've finally gotten around to responding via email - I'm sorry it took me so long. Cheers. '''''' +The image DOES belong on Wikipedia, as I've now realized. If this article, however, cannot be edited, how are we going to put references on this article? It needs references. talk 8:16 pm, 9 October 2009 (UTC) +Nope. By policy here it is not a reliable source. — +" OK, the second one was worse, despite the warnings. Go for it. ''''''wordsdeeds " +DYK hook Sğleyman Nazif Please check again. Cheers. +http://www.themarysue.com/metroids-samus-aran-transgender-woman/ It should work. +Content of Emergy page was replaced by MT Brown and S Ulgiati according to a mandate received from the International Society for the Advancement of Emergy Research (ISAER) during the most recent Biennial Emergy Conference (16-18 January 2010). MT Brown is the ISAER Historian and S Ulgiati is President-elect 2010. We thank those who displayed their efforts in earlier attempts of setting up an emergy page and other related pages in Wikipedia. Suggestions on strengthening the article are welcome. +"This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed: ([ block log] • [ ipblocklist] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ • [ unblock])''' Reason for unblocking: I am extremely sorry for my child's behaviour i have severly told him off and said such behaviour is not acceptable. I would be most grateful if u could unblock me. I am a regular contributer to this site, and always endeveur to maintain the respectability of the webiste. once again i am truly sorry for my child's actions, and he will be punished for this. Thanks Jeff xxx Note: Please check your block log linked above. If there are no blocks listed, or the latest one has already expired, then you have been autoblocked. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead. We cannot unblock you otherwise. Administrator use only: If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following as notification. {{unblock reviewed|1=I am extremely sorry for my child's behaviour i have severly told him off and said such behaviour is not acceptable. I would be most grateful if u could unblock me. I am a regular contributer to this site, and always endeveur to maintain the respectability of the webiste. once again i am truly sorry for my child's actions, and he will be punished for this. Thanks Jeff xxx|decline=reason — ~~~~}} If you accept the request (note that you MAY NOT unblock your own account), replace the unblock template with , and post the following directly underneath the unblock template: {{subst:Request accepted|reason}} " +" Vogue In order to rate an article as Good you must nominate it through the WP:GAN process.  (talk) " +Jade Kwan The image you are trying to use doesnt exist. You should upload an image first, then use it on the page. Talk! Contrib! +YES Now is the time! +WP:AAB = Wikipedia: Appealing a block) Please, someone help. I believe I have something to offer here, and I can stay off of WM Species, if necessary. My biology is pretty weak, anyway. 72.53.194.237 +" Campbell sources Yup, I just saw that you had made the changes. I've been trying to find some sources for the last couple of days but couldn't. I can't remember if I was the guy who put in the ""pen in the hand of Campbell"" or not. I definitely read that somewhere years ago. Then when I had lunch with Heinlein back in the early 80s I asked him about it and he was not happy with the concept, hehe. So, unfortunately, that falls under Original Research, I guess. I encountered a similar problem with other comments that I put into the Heinlein article.... Wish I could source this. " +"::::::: I'm not going to comment on anything involving Chepstow since I have no knowledge whatsoever about that, but on the Gibraltar side of things, let's just look for a moment at who is writing the articles. Roger, who Andreas likes to quote, has no involvement in creating, writing, reviewing or directing the production of articles. The largest number of English-language articles in this topic area has been written by Anne, " +" I'm not sure you've thought this through. Take iron, for example: iron is used in construction and is also important in biology. It stands to reason though that both can't involve more than 50% and so according to your argument we should exclude one from the ""iron"" article. " +I didn't do any editing to Kurt Angle's page so why don't you kiss my ass? +, 27 December 2013 (UTC) It is a form of trivia and should be avoided i.e. useless information when plot summaries should be concise and to the point. See WP:HTRIVIA and WP:PLOTSUM Message 20:02 +Mufti Umar Farooq Desai Could I have the deleted article moved to my userspace? +" Thank you for experimenting with the page August 16 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. " +" This is a propaganda piece to promote the state of Israel and is comprised of positive quotes that were amalgamated to create a bubbly image of the Israeli film industry. It completely disregards WP:NPOV, and was edited by someone who edits on a lot of the topics that Why was this reverted? It's not a personal attack. I never called User:David Shankbone a promoter of Lucas' porn movies (no matter my opinion), just that he edits articles on them. I also said that this is a propaganda piece obviously written by someone who wants to promote Israel. Unless you, David ""Shankbone"", are User:WatchingWhales, this shouldn't concern you. If you are, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. J. From Nevada 216.241.55.204 " +" Just FYI, you have already been blocked before and hence you are already aware of what is unacceptable. I am well aware of the warning templates and theur usages and I have plenty of admins who will take a quck look at this page and block you. Go have your ""temper fit"" on another site. " +French communes Thanks for adding templates to French communes. Could you use Template:French commune instead of copying the details of the template into each article? Thanks! +Also note that usual practice is to omit articles like The from the start of the name of an article. Even The Ohio State University, which is very particular how it styles its name to include that leading The, has its Wikipedia article titled Ohio State University. —'''''' (talk) +After all, that's simply your opinion. +" The Chain Barnstar of Recognition The Chain Barnstar of RecognitionFor making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. The Chain Barnstar of Merit The Chain Barnstar of MeritFor your hard work! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 4 others with 1500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. The Chain Barnstar of Diligence The Chain Barnstar of DiligenceFor shaping Wikipedia! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3 others with 2500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of HonourFor building Wikipedia! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 2 others with 5000+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. " +i c u gave up aw r u chiken? +please please be a good man and report him for blocking please you seem like a good guy. or if you do not want to involved tell me how im report him he deleting facts by his opinion please. +" Yes makes sense. I approve a change of this kind. I have put ""planet earth"". Language congruent with this kind of tv series. " +http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&gbv;=2&tbs;=isch:1&sa;=1&q;=lime+green&aq;=f&aqi;=g10&aql;=&oq;=&gs;_rfai= Lime green, huh? Give it up. They're yellow. Anyone who has seen them personally can tell you that. +I added a new school - MSAE - to the list +FIRST && FOREMOST dis`n here is a stub ... so yeah ... me + my big sis workin on it ! chill ! +" Dear Cyrille, except that the sentence ""If ratified"" was added by me. " +" ""False accusations are personal attacks though."" - So you admit it. That's a start. Now how about staying within all of the other rules? If you're keen for me to keep reading the BS that you keep churning out onto my talk page, you might also care to use correct spelling and grammar.( )" +" I used WP:TWINKLE to place the proposed deletion notice, and it automatically adds a note to your talk page. Sorry about that. ... talk " +—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) . True. However, that is the cover of the book, and the article is about the movie. Accordingly, presenting the book cover on the article about the movie does not qualify as fair use: and that's the issue in play here. —'''''' (talk) +OF course the sentence is redundand as the above statement already makes a statement over the US being very powerful. +" blackouts I'm sorry, but this policy of the NFL seems really idiotic, like they are punishing the city for not selling their stadium out? Wouldn't that be the prerogative of the team owner? Also, why haven't there been riots over this sort of thing. If my team was playing and the NFL was saying ""sorry but we a douchebags"" I wouldn't be surprised to see some kind of mass protest flare up." +" Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to Charo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Stop leaving comments ab out blockin us ur all talk show us what ya can do!!!!!!!!!!!!! +" A belated welcome! ]]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mreastenders. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on , consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! –projectors– " +Kingston a Free Trader? Cite? Kingston a Free Trader? Cite? +I think Super GM is inappropriate title for Wesley So. Only GMs with rating of 2700 and above are considered Super GM. +A simple example that the article is a total lie: Federer has never won simultaneously on clay grass and hard. still that point is as a record in the article, there are so many others like it.108.78.177.132 +" Page move Why has this page been moved? Rendlesham Forest Incident is a recognised name for this affair, being given in many sources, and so is therefore a proper noun. coll " +He is a CHEATER, and the article should say that. +" ""With permission"" images Hi, I have listed images Image:01miesenbach-market-square-250.jpg, Image:01haus-des-buergers.jpg, Image:Miesenbach-market-square-250.jpg, Image:Miesenbach-market-square.jpg, Image:01Azur-outdoor.jpg, Image:01stadt-ramstein-250.jpg, Image:01haus-des-buergers-250.jpg, Image:01ramstein-lion.jpg, Image:01ramstein-rathaus.jpg, Image:01ramstein-rathaus-250.jpg, Image:01miesenbach-market-square.jpg, Image:01stadt-ramstein.jpg and Image:01Azur-outdoor-250.jpg on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images (under May 5) because ""permission to use"" does not equal ""no rights reserved"" as they where tagged. Additionaly ""with permission"" is not an acceptable license for Wikipedia as it does no allow others to use the images in a way that is compatable with the GFDL license Wikipedia releases it's content under. Unless you can obtain a permission to actualy release those images under a free license I'm afraid they have to go. (talk) " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to West Potomac High School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) " +User:Smee Please see +"::There is a balance issue here. The ""Black Buck raids"" section is peppered with wikilinks and unless the reader suffers from a very bad memory, two of the wikilinks are superfluous. I'm convinced that strategic wikilinks are in order, combined with ""Argentine"" replacing ""AAF"" when possible. Regards, " +Ant. = Anthioch. I should ask you for you addition. Why do you add that ? +Perhaps CorporateM should write an article about SLAPP suits, Freedom of Speech, etc. and use these citations in that article. Refrain from hijacking this article to advocate your position on First Amendment stuff. thenightchicagodied +If Kenny, JFD, and Freedom skies can have their say on IMA, then so can I... +Mao's health is a major issue and how he took care of his body is also an issue. The swimming episodes are even more revealing (Mao rejected advice that the river was much too dangerous to swim in). +January 2008 Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not remove templates from articles without correcting the problems they signal. +Fuck You Fuck you, douchébag +" Sexuality discussion I was surprised to see the ""Sexuality"" section I had created, so arbitrarily removed. I will not just revert that edit, instead I will bring the text here so that if anyone has substantive disagreements with the material we can work them out before it is re-added to the article. The old version was simply slanted and incorrect to boot, lumping discussions of his sexuality into the posthumous section, despite the fact that allusions and accusations raged well before there was anything posthumous about the man. Sexuality Bacon is widely acknowledged to have had romantic attachments to other males, and is today considered to have had homosexual tastes. Among the many modern authors acknowledging this aspect of his life are A .L. Rowse, A .L. Rowse, Homosexuals in History, New York: Carroll & Garf, 1977. page 44 Rictor Norton, Rictor Norton, ""Sir Francis Bacon"", The Great Queens of History, updated 8 Jan. 2000 http://www.infopt.demon.co.uk/baconfra.htm, Alan Stewart, Jardine, Lisa; Stewart, Alan Hostage To Fortune: The Troubled Life of Francis Bacon Hill & Wang, 1999. page 148, Louis Crompton, Homosexuality and Civilization; pp388-391 and Joseph Cady. Nieves Mathews is among the few modern writers to take an opposing view,Mathews, Nieves Francis Bacon: The History of a Character Assassination, Yale University Press, 1996 claiming that the sources are not conclusive: (1) a quote from the private diary of Simonds D'Ewes (Bacon's enemy in Parliament, but considered to be a responsible and scrupulous lawyer), (2) a quote from Brief Lives by John Aubrey (written after Bacon's passing): he ""was a pederast"" and ""had ganimeds and favourites"", (3) and a note by Ann Bacon in which she expressed disapproval of the friends Francis and Anthony were associating with (since one was a ""Papist"" and money was owned to her sons: ""that bloody Percy [who Bacon kept] as a coach companion and bed companion.""). Coaches were one of the few private spaces at the time, thus the term ""coach companion"" is a clear reference to sexual doings. " +Once again stop removing the information! +I Don't Get it By User:Solo28 How can a non-Leon Schlesinger Cartoon be directed by Bob Clampett?It doesn't make sense! +and you are a motherfucking asshole,suck your dick,you dirty son of a whore +Forwarding Is it considered bad etiquette to forward emails without permission? Yeah, but who cares. +Thank you, the page I'm trying to edit is Seven the General can I have some help from some one with it? I just put up my edits +There is some content dispute over how Roy is connected to the IAC which is the subject of Wikipedia's article. Nevertheless, Roy is a notable person even without his IAC role, and is a well known / notable public interest advocate and RTI activist in India. So I suggest that you restore the Sarbajit Roy article so it can be improved to Wikipedia standards by auto-confirmed editors. +" ""best known"" No-one's yet explained the reason for their desperation to have this phrase in the article. It is an assumption, an opinion, and what you would need to turn it into a fact would be a global poll asking a representative sample of the population what they know him for. At a conservative guess I'd say 99% of the world's population would never even have heard of him. NPOV requires that you state the facts and don't judge them. What next? The Moon, best known for being the Earth's largest natural satellite? Berlin, best known for being the capital of Germany? This inanity needs to stop. 190.162.52.196 " +" Response Interestingly, although scienceopologist has admittedly never ""read and understood"" what Langan says about particular subjects related to the CTMU (since he sees no reason for it), he nevertheless presumes to include his irrelevant personal opinions about what Langan believes about particular subjects related to the CTMU. As anyone familiar with the controversy is well aware, no ID proponent has a theory identical or even similar to evolutionist Langan's. (If one does, we'd need verification for that, preferably by some one who has actually read Langan's work.) Regarding guilt by association: Immanuel Velikovsky was associated with Einstein through voluminous correspondence. Are we therefore to note that Einstein was associated with people now widely regarded as cranks, and that his theories need to be reconsidered in this light? I think not. " +"certainly surprising. wasn't it your nutty assertion above that the jerusalem post failed as a reliable source because it's part of conrad black's zionist media conspiracy? i think you did. in fact anyone can see that you did right up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muhammad_al-Durrah#NPOV_in_light_of_the_Karsenty_verdict i guess the rule is that op-eds are worthless sources when they don't work for chrisO's narrative; compelling must-reads which establish the fact of the matter when they do work for chrisO's narrative. court-appointed forensic ballistics experts are ""fringe kooks"" also. and everything which contradicts chrisO's weltanschauung is a rightwing conspiracy. side note, i actually added text which stated discretly that the libel conviction had been overturned by a higher court, but that was rv'd. such a statement of fact is a little too stark for the article campers' tastes. such things have to be insulated and obscured by intricately-parsed verbosity which in the end gives the impression that nothing was decided in the court case at all. the operative definition here for npov violation, after all, is ""not chrisO's pov. " +DAYLANS A LOOSER AND IK KANT SPEL +" I see you have obtained permission to use this image. Unfortunately, we no longer accept ""permission-only"" images; for us to use it, it must be released under a free license (GFDL, CC-by-SA). If you can get the owner of the copyright to release the image under such a license and either post that permission on their website or email permissions@wikimedia.org to give permission, we can use the image; otherwise, it will have to be deleted. Talk " +REDIRECT Talk:The Masters Grand Slam of Curling +Proposal to merge USCGC Jarvis (WHEC-725) with BNS Somudro Joy (F-28) A proposal to merge the articles USCGC Jarvis (WHEC-725) and BNS Somudro Joy (F-28) has been suggested. Discussion can be found on the talk page Talk:USCGC Jarvis (WHEC-725). Interested editors please take note. +Regarding workstations, servers and mainframes I believe that workstations and servers are classes of computers, not sizes. For example, consider the IBM Power 595. It is a server, is it not? From the page, IBM seems to think so, and it certainly fits the definition of a server, with that being a computer that provides a service(s) to client(s). Now, consider the IBM Power 520. This too is a server, is it not? IBM thinks so, and it fits the definition. However, the Power 595 is not a desktop. It is nowhere near a desktop. It is a rackmount (IBM-speak: framemount) server, as evidenced by its dimensions: (201.4 cm x 77.5 cm x 180.6 cm); and weight: (1,552 kg). I will personally give anyone who can fit this on an average office desk from Ikea, a cookie. Now, the Power 520 is not a rackmount server. It is nowhere near a rackmount server. It is a deskside server, as evidenced by its dimensions: (540 mm x 182-328 mm x 628 mm); and weight: (40.8 kg). I will personally give anyone who can convince a Fortune 500 company that the Power 520 is a top-of-the-line rackmount server, a cookie. Two very different machines, both in hardware and form factor, but they are still both classed as a server. Clearly, as evidenced by this, servers can be in many form factors. A server can be a desktop, but it is not exclusively a desktop. How the article is currently written seems to suggest that it is. A server can also be a rackmount, a tower, a blade, a deskside and a pedestal, to name a few. Workstations also come in more form factors than just desktop. Many servers are desktops (as in horizontal) and are small and light enough to be placed on a desk (the second, more historical definition of a desktop). However, they can also be in a deskside, tower, rackmountable or pedestal form factor, just to name a few. This can be remedied by not using classes to determine size. Instead, use form factors such as blade, rackmount, deskside, etc. +GTFO You're a douche. +" Hold on! Why are you removing the season episode list from episode pages?? chat " +Trailers Trailers for The Dark knight have been surfacing from god knows where. You Tube has great teaser trailers. You can even see The Joker. But i feel a little dissapointed on how he looks. But hey , that's just my Talk. +":I'm not really interested in hyperbolic assertions (who said anything about 'western canons of legitimacy being irrelevant'). but if you want a good solid sourced quote to use, let's use the one Gandy provided at the beginning of the #Continued from above... section: ""Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is a broad domain of resources that encompasses health systems, modalities, and practices and their accompanying theories and beliefs, other than those intrinsic to the dominant health system of a particular society or culture in a given historical period. CAM includes such resources perceived by their users as associated with positive health outcomes. Boundaries within CAM and between the CAM domain and the domain of the dominant system are not always sharp or fixed."" (gandy, we seem to have lost the citation for this - can you recover it?). As I said then, it's hellishly wordy (mine is much simpler, and says the essentially the same), but at least it's a straight-forward description. we'll deal with synth as it arises. Ludwigs2 " +stupid sit i will behead you +"==Harry Potter Spells== Since JK Rowling is such an idiot and doesn't actually know Latin, she tries to mimic a scholarly background with the ridiculous incantations she makes up for the spells. ""Wingardium Leviosa"" is an example of a moron trying to imitate Latin in a desperate attempt to appear educated. JK Rowling and er idiocy should definitely be in this article. " +What the fuck? People add unsourced shit to the wikipedia all the time. Why the fuck are you picking on me? Shit, god forbid there be something unsourced about a fucking current event. They should have put you in charge during the Pearl Harbor bombings... your response time would have been bloody brilliant. +" ""Safety"" section ambiguity The final sentence of the ""Safety"" section (""But can be equally as dangerous should falling occur and rescue be delayed."") is unclear and grammatically unsound." +It appears as though in many articles on actors like Shahrukh Khan you can describe the subject in the actual event - like {some pic - SRK portrays the title character in Devdas}, so I think you could put a pic of {Thorpe competes in some event at a past olympics}. '''''' (bananabucket) +Hi Todd I'll curently looking at WP:ARBMAC. +Oppose Seems pointless. +The article was added by Potters House for deletion purely out of personal spite because I had contributed to it in the past. In other words, just nuisance activity. I consider that a relevant background fact worth sharing, together with the pasted evidence of his past behavior to back it up. You consider it merely 'personal attack'. That's where we diverge, and, to confine my comments to purely content: your pathetic mealy mouthed little edit isn't worthy of my piss, let alone my time. +" A friendly note Peter, This is NoC. I am here to try and explain something that I think you've misunderstood. The claim that I was denying peoplehood to Jews is incorrect. Those edits you've noted were, in fact, fighting a particular ANTISEMITIC person. His edits were such that he claimed Lazar Kaganovich was responsible for the Ukrainian Holodomor BECAUSE he was Jewish (and he tried to use Jewwatch as a source), tried to remove Israel from a list of countries selling pringles based on the incorrect assumption that Israel is not a country, and then went around inserting ""is a person of Jewish descent"" into articles about Jews he did not like. I was not denying Jews peoplehood, I was corecting the fallacy that Judaism is only a genetic ethnicity, which is a lie perpetrated by people like Hitler. Sposer explained it to you exactly as I would have. There are many many Jews who are not decendents of the original Hebrews. There are people who converted, people who were the product of mixed marriages in Europe, etc. They are Jews too. Concentrating on the religion aspect does not deny peoplehood, rather it eliminates the fallacy that Jews are a ""race"" only. If you would like to discuss further, please ask Fayssal for my e-mail and I will be happy to talk to you. I am doing my best to at least clear up these misconceptions. Best wishes. 75.3.113.9 " +Strong Support as nominator. This is totally insulting to see that a regional entity is equal with a sovereign country. There is only one Georgia and it is in the Caucasus. [[user:GeorgianJorjadze|georgianJORJADZE]] +Especially when they're inside of me or my shed. +" Newest vandalisms by Tajik as anon IP He persianises the article Timurid dynasty with thousands of lies and with exploiting the memory of the dead of the Armnenian genocide to discredit me suggesting me as a Turk to better discredit me with the Armenian genocide and let his version ""win"" via this kind of discrediting. Shame on you, Tajik. You exploit this tragedy for your psychopathic wikipedia vandalisms. He vandalises against sources like Thackston and Manz and Amitav Ghosh. Additionally the meaning ""Timuriyan"" was not used by the Timurides themselves. This is the current word with which someone calls the Timurides today in the streets of Teheran. All these vandalisms did occur though he is blocked. Of course it is another IP (also 82.83.xx.xx, de:User:Phoenix2 and also his old sock puppet de:User:Christoffel, whith which he said racist stuff, that he could not say with his ordinal account), he has dynamic IPs. Here you can also see that he ""fought"" with the IP 84.58.xx.xx here on this page and also at german Wikipedia in the Timurides article (same stuff). (just for the records. bye) " +", 28 November 2014 (UTC) I think this one is an overseas Filipino broadsheet made by OFWs in another country.'''''' 10:44" +" I wasn't sure if ""Will Bareback"" was an actual past account of Will's or not, so I was going to ask him about it before posting the final RfC. The other edits the IP has made appear to be helpful, so I don't have a problem with the IP helping out. Will, do you think one possible reason someone may be using an IP is to avoid being the recipient of threatening behavior, as occurred today to Keithrob? " +Legally printing an image of a banknote? Is it illegal to print an image of a banknote provided that you use it for display rather than to actually purchase things? Do film studios have to have some sort of special procedure for using fake money in films? Do the notes have to have a special marker on them? 128.243.253.114 +db-bio I agree on deleting this , but I think the better approach might have been db-bio: nn bio, content was: 'Jeff Tudhope, a McMaster University student, works for the city of Brantford during the summers.' (and the only contributor was 'Solo1155') +I am from Bolton,and from my experience going to Bury i would say that the older Bury Locals pronounce the name as Burri whereas younger Locals say Berri.However in Bolton both young and old Boltonians say Burri. +PfD's... Some of the pages I created were posted as PfD's for days now, And they were voted to keep, do you know when should the templates be removed? +" Yes it is. Thank you so much for your help. Many people will be surprised to know that most Hindi film articles were actually started by you. • Talk2me " +" A simple suggestion Instead of contextualizing paragraph two by books of ""The Bible,"" which implies a later, Christian source, the more relevant words ""Hebrew Bible"" or ""Tanakh"" (or both) ought to be the terms of definition. Otherwise, one might start to think that ""Old Testament"" translations, based upon the Greek Septaguint, are the authorities when in fact the Masoretic text of the Tanakh is considered by Jews the obvious standard. The term 'Bible' does not at all imply a later Christian source. It is a widely used term for the books considered canonical by Christians, that is not to say that they have a Christian origin. It is also a misunderstanding that translations based on the Septuagint are authoritative for Christians. Nearly all English Bible translations are in fact based on the Masoretic text. Only in Eastern Orthodox streams of Christianity is the Septuagint the standard Bible. In any case, apart from a few fringe groups, Christians realize that the authority of any translation ultimately goes back to the original Hebrew (i.e. for the books of the Bible originally written in Hebrew of course). Failure to contextualize The ""Construction"" section's 7th paragraph begins ""In 1967 Israel captured Old Jerusalem (and the Temple Mount) from Jordan."" No other information is given about this; the impression is that Israel invaded Jordan without provocation, when in fact Israel's actions in the 1967 war were in response to a mass attack upon her by Arab countries, including Jordan, after Egypt's General Nasser and the other Arab States allied with Egypt had engaged in an act of war by closing down Israel's ability to ship through the Straits of Tiran with the express and stated purpose of annihilating Israel. This false impression must be corrected if it is to avoid being unintentionally anti-Semitic. Having a bias against Israel is not the same as being anti-Semitic. Also, I think the current statement is simply concise, not going deep into the political situation because this is not the topic of the article. However, if you feel contextualizing is necessary, just go ahead. Remember Wikipedia's policy to be bold. " +" August 2011 (UTC) Oppose for now. Until the storm is officially retired, the disambiguated title needs to stay. 4872 01:56, 29" +Agreed the timing on people vane be irritating. My plan is to wait to see what u do with the pages, and then merge them into one. Ive found several sources of my own, saying Nu Metal and Alternative Metal are names for the same thing. Alternetive Metal being a pet name for Nu Metal bands, and Nu Metal being an insult given to bands. Thus the pages still need merging, either way. Lest, ill let you make the pages better before i do a proper merger. I suggest checking the Gothic Metal temp page for what im planning to do with it. And i have someone getting citians for Korn and SOAD themselfs saying they are Nu Metal bands. +CAS2? Could somone expand this page to include some info on CAS2 (CAS3, etc.?) Thanks! +No, they are not. +Disputed neutrality? Where is the dispute on the article's neutrality? +Muddy Waters I walked into Barnes and Noble last night and the song was playing, so I guess I have no choice but to return...the gods have spoken ) Thanks so much for your message. +speedydel_wiki.citing full consent, can be deleted. the page which you have given is somewhat complicated, so i left my stuff in the see-aslo section. the path from main_page to that page is mainpage/communityportal/quickdirectory/editing. One could call it 'hidden'. This one is all one needs, could someone add it to the main_page ? +You know full well Islam is not as peaceful as Christianity, it is the only major religion that does not subscribe to the Golden Rule, it doesn't have anything in it like Sermon on the Mount, or the Beautitudes, or 'Turn the other Cheek'. Where is there anything that peaceful in the Quran? The Quran is a book of hate, I find it offensive, and I want you to remove certain verses that offend me. +" Re: Photos for 1999 Sydney hailstorm Hi! First of all, great work with the article! I do recall taking photos of my street covered with hails, however I wasn't sure if that was in 1999. However these photos are of extremely poor quality (taken with a phone camera back then....you can imagine how poor quality it is). Sorry I'm unable to help. Keep up with the great work! No worries - if you know anyone who has photos, please whack them over the head and get them to give them to you to upload ) Cheers, '''''' " +PS: When you do reset the interval to eight hours, please also set the time of the next update to 16:00 UTC, when it should be (eight hours after the 08:00 UTC update). Otherwise, we'll still be off cycle with a 20:15 UTC update, and it will take several days for the bot to move at 15 minute increments to reset as above. Many thanks. +I did NOT post that the Ex-Beeline are in service yet,that was AEMoreira042281, look at the history: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MTA_Regional_Bus_Operations_bus_fleet&action;=history and look at every history because I never posted the Ex-Beelie on the current roster. How dare you accuse me and you call me stupid, you are a asshole. +Actually no ChrisB I am sorry but your comment will need to be removed plain and simply because I have orignal research(which is from billboard itself) and you nothing beside some unverified sources.You say that you have proof than show it to me.Until then I have original research and you don't.And if you want to argue some more you may want to read THIS first. -CAYA +" Right. You're talking about me. (I am new here and now I can sign my name which you'll see in the end of this). So, what you guys want with the ""Inner"" Mongolia thing? Do you think you own this NPOV thing or ""shei shuo le suan""? You? Simply I removing yours and you removing mine is not the solution. You wanna discuss? Then first you Chinese have to let the Mongols freely talk about their own country. My name is Dugar and you can reach me at dugarjab at yahoo dot kom. Here is my signature: " +" I've done some copyediting on the article, placed a copyedit request at the WikiProject League of Copyeditors and added a ""copyedit"" tag, but is there anything else left I can do to help with this article on becoming an FA status? Thanks. " +" Thanks for your help!! → in re: deletion Thanks for your help with my recent CSD! • Talk • Wolfnix has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the ""WikiLove"" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with ! Wolfnix has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the goodness of kittens by adding to someone's talk page with a friendly message! " +cinema.currentweek.net is not a reliable source. Please see WP:Identifying reliable sources. Otherwise, if you keep insisting on using that source, editors will keep reverting your edits and you may get blocked for edit warring if you insist on adding that source. +Discussion has been settled. Result: use ceremonial counties for disambiguation of places, and in a geographic frame of reference, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Olney, Milton Keynes; Caversham, Reading; Wanborough, Swindon. +" During his myriad reporting assignments, Harris comes across several self-help gurus, including Deepak Chopra. Roanoke Times Duality, an upcoming short film featuring narration by New Age guru Deepak Chopra The Hollywood Reporter inspired by mindfulness guru Deepak Chopra. Deepak Chopra: perfil del gurú de la medicina alternativa (Deepak Chopra: profile of a guru of alternative medicine El Pais “Karma is experience, and experience creates memory, and memory creates imagination and desire,” said new-age guru Deepak Chopra. Golf Week including alternative medicine guru Deepak Chopra Huffingtong Post Those are all usages from within the past 4 weeks. Do you really want to press the ludicrous claim that the term ""guru"" is NOT widely applied to chopra by reliable sources? TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom " +Hey, this is Herbert! Hi, Karen is here! Group name: HKCD Wiki Team Topic: UTM, University of Toronto Mississauga Group members: Herbert Sham - Karen Yu - Kelvin Chu - David Fu - Spokesperson & Designated Sandbox: Herbert Sham - This is Karen speaking here. I think we should finalize our topic by today We should limit our options to: - Music - Movies - Sports - Current Events - School Herb suggested that we might do WongFu Productions. Also, I just opened a facebook group for active discussion. Let's divide the work! Important reminders: - Please divide your post by four ( - ) - It is important that you label your own posts by four ( ~ ) Okay, our finalized topic is UTM, University of Toronto Mississauga Let's discuss about the details tomorrow. - Responsibilities - Where to edit and what to add Okay so the basic layout of the new site will be: History: Karen, David Governance: Kelvin Campus: Karen (Proofreading:David, Kelvin, Herbert) Academics: minor editing by Kelvin and David Student Life -Department of Student Life: Kelvin -Campus Radio: Kelvin -Theatre and Drama Studies -The Blackwood Gallery -Residence: Herbert, Kelvin, David Facilities -Library: David, Karen -Athletics Centre: David, Herbert - Transportation: Herbert +" yes it is, the official list of works from NGA is missing a couple at the bottom of our list. i think this one was at east building courtyard, until moved after sculpture garden opening. ⇔ †@1₭ " +Buddha and India link Hey can you help me? I have a problem with the way some of Buddhism page's information has and it has to do with telling people that Buddhism came from India and that the Buddha was born in Ancient India. Do you remember me? 71.105.87.54 +You dosh bag, dont mess with me. My watch is worth more then your car, so if you know whats good for you, shut up. By the way are you a chick fucker? +Unspecified source for Image:CaptureD34.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:CaptureD34.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pictures Hello, User, I noticed your contributions. Please refrain from uploading pictures with no source information, copyright information and the correct tags - if you continue adding them to the articles, it will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked. Best regards, +This article has nothing about Mugen Power. It is a copy and paste copy a history of mobile phones and basically an ad for Mugen. There is no real information about the company or its history. This is a shame. +your buddy tyto alba is much more friendly, pehaps you just do not enjoy flowery language and are happier to sing into to world of fact. i admit that while i do like miachel barrymore and stuart lubbock and nirvana erotic fan fiction your not making it easy on me and in the end its about truth??? TRUTH the important part of it. +If anyone has the lists of the top 50 over the years that would be great...there are lists from 2003 on one of the links but couldnt find the from before that. +Roleplay Online Cheers for the helpful close on that one. +Summary from the Source I went and summarized the source in my own words: Science shows that the Earth formed around 4.5 billion years ago. The organisms that live on Earth have completely changed its air (atmosphere); this is called a biosphere. 71% of Earth's surface is covered in salt water oceans. Earth is the only place in the Solar System where liquid water is known to exist at present. The other 29% is made of rocky land in the shape of continents and islands. Earth interacts with other objects in the Solar System, particularly the Sun and the Moon. The Earth orbits or goes around the Sun roughly once every 365.25 days. One spin is called a day and one orbit around the Sun is called a year. This is why there are 365 days in a year, but a leap day is added once every 4 years. It'd be great if someone could add that for me, I have a rocket to catch! Bye for now ;) +POINT/CIVIL/AGF/IDONTLIKEIT, etc. I think it should be pointed out that while violating these policies and guidelines almost continuously, he also frequently invokes them against anyone who doesn't share his viewpoint. In this he is at least consistent hypocritical. (He's also hypercritical.) +One pint of feces. ON YOUR FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE +" The protection should have expired by now, so it should be editable now. Definitely do let me know if you notice any other suspicious activity though. Thanks!  t/c " +REDIRECT Talk:Northeast Delta Dental Stadium +Done. If you are going to do a bunch, just let me know when you're done and I'll add the whole batch. Thanks!— • (yo?); March 8, 2011; 16:32 (UTC) +Allegations of sock puppetry on the Center for Science in the Public Interest page Allegations of sock puppetry have been made against some of the accounts that have edited the Center for Science in the Public Interest page. I have instigated the wiki process for handling such allegations. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Justin. As someone who has contributed to the CSPI page, please add your views to the Comments section. You have up to 10 days to make comments on the allegation. +htaccess compatibility A word about that would be nice. There are rulesets wich appear to work out of the box, but does it applies to all of them ? +"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Spathularia flavida/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) rev (Robert) – talk " +Dear editor, kindly refrain from edit warring and vandalism, SP balsubrahmanya is from andhra pradesh and has significantly contributed to telugu film industry when compared to others. ( ). +" Ill chill you I am giving them a message, along with a ""note"" as it is called on forums(that is level 2 or 1 violation notice). That is when you hand out a light warning, not a level 3 or above. " +I have never insulted anyone, but where is the evidence that this party is neo-liberal? There is controversy because you seem to be the only one who agrees that the party is in fact neoliberal. You hardly constitute a consensus on all things Liberal, when few users have challenged you on this. 03:59, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC) +"Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia. If you want to, drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself. You can sign your name on talk pages by using "" ~~~ "" for your username and "" ~~~~ "" for your username and a timestamp. Welcome is a good place to start. Wikipedia:Tutorial runs through all the basics. Wikipedia:How does one edit a page gives editing help. Wikipedia:Manual of Style gives formatting info. Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines tell about the principles we operate on. It's important, but don't try to read it all now. Wikipedia:Help covers a broad range of useful topics. Wikipedia:Help desk is a place to ask questions. Wikipedia:Show preview explains how to double-check your edits before saving. You can also feel free to ask me a question on my talk page. I'll answer if I'm here. Happy editing, ☎ " +, 23 August 2006 (UTC) It was , apparently. Geez, what nerve. 03:36 +WP:POINT has nothing to do with that comment. - +Cambridge University WP soc (from ) There's no process yet - just sign your name onto the list for now! yck C. +caused her approval rating to slip +" I've moved the past edits to this article to Marot (name) (""history split""). " +" has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.haha" +Your Opinion Ed Even though you and I don't see eye to eye Mr. Poor, I must confess that what you on user talk Augusto Pinochet was correct, I have done a lot of research on the subject, and got knocked out in a fight with one of my communist friends because I thought Pinochet stopped a Marxist dicatorship in Chile. Thank you and God Bless Mr. Poor 04:53, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) +What is fair application of the rules? Don't apply them. ANARCHY IS THE FUTURE [spay paints line on rich suburban home]. +" AN discussion Hi A930913. There's currently a discussion about BracketBot at the administrators' noticeboard - see WP:AN#BracketBot. Sorry you're receiving this late - it looks like the original poster forgot to notify you. Best — '''''''''' ♪ talk ♪ " +fucky mc fuck fuck your a little bitch go suck your daddys cock you desperate little peice of shit, get a life, seriously, i bet you are 35 and have never had a kiss and you masterbate all day to kittens and your neighbors kids +Keep There's an entire category for US weekday schedules. This isn't a TV GUIDE schedule of what's available for viewing this week, so I don't understand why this page has been proposed for deletion. +I do not know how to report another person for edit warring. Kindly point me to that info. That sockpuppet you are talking about(I currently have two active accounts in total) is because I wish to delete my first account. And again, I don't know what all implications it will have, particularly to articles that I may have edited with that account. So I have left it undeleted. Kindly point me to any relevant info. +You are such a fucking hypocrite. I hope you get raped and killed by some lunatic like Andrew Morrow. +" Also it says at the top of SuggestBot's posts on my page"" We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High . However the contact information in the consent information sheet is dead. I never consented to be part of this ""study"". " +" It is possible that we are having small mistake with this ban4life ? My thinking is that this edit summary (bye) has been OK, because that is my last edit on english wikipedia. About my broken english it is possible only to say that interwiki spammer has accepted my incomprehensible rant and ended his spamming on sh wikipedia. You can read his statement:""Rijecina2: Don´t worry this will notbe a wiki problem. This discussion will help solve existing problems"" . Example of July spamiming on sh wikipedia you can look in this link. When this Juli it has become clear that I will become administrator on sh wikipedia I have started to write warnings on others wikipedia about interwiki spam or vandal problems (interwiki warning example on bosnian wiki from 9 August and I will continue to do this in the future. For me it is hard to imagine that this is disruptive conduct or that administrators (which I am on sh wiki) on other wiki must know good english to write interwiki warning on english wikipedia ? My proposition is to change definition of this ban4life in: ""Requested by the user on sh.wikipedia as an unwanted SUL local account"" and remove ban4life from user:Rjecina2 on english wikipedia so that I can contact administrators or vandals on english wiki about ""small"" interwiki problems on sh wiki which have started on english wiki " +I did it because u can't hear me clearly so I put the words bigger for you to see pls caps doesn't mean shouting +Subpages are definitely out. 15:12 10 Jun 2003 (UTC) +I agree with this deletion. The information about an unnamed child pornpgraphy ring being busted in Ukraine could be added to a relevant article, such as Pedophilia. - +" Account creation should now be possible. (talk) " +Unblock me please. I will do my job as a editor as when I first joined wikipedia. I can only make good contibutes to wikipedia if I am unblocked. So, please unblock me +So, after you, if I got it right, NATO is vandalising and putting Romania in a wrong place. +China smells like fart. China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China smells like fart.China sm +Hey pal we may do a deal: please let in peace the articles of Carl Grissom and Bob the goon. Also unlock the Chase Meridian articles and accept that Jack Napier are in Batman Forever. In change I will let of vandalize the user articles. +Nicely written article. I hope any re-write doesn't lose that. +Thanks for taking note of the request to link new BLPs to other language wikipedias. +" I've already accepted two versions by Hob not even mentioned by Askolnick in his two versions. The non-descriptive one and the one with ""theoretical work on psi"" or some such thing. The fact is that it is Askolnick, not me, who is rejecting anything but his own version on the basis af some spurious arguments about the fuzziness of every word in the English language except the ones he wishes to use. " +" Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Walkie-talkie " +Unblock Exempt Thank you for handling this quickly and efficiently. I assure you I will only use it for quality, rule abiding editing. +I'm guessing this person has a Stormfront account. +u no wat ass hole go fuck your self and stop ben a dick head u in trouble no motha fucka u be getin a visit fronm the fbi.buddy so keep it coming and yourl never find me +William M Connolley is contradicting himself I am copying this from a section higher up on this same page. | Talk 19:51:33, 2005-07-31 (UTC). Now - on with the explanation. The Coriolis effect is a change-of-coordinates force (and thus bears intriguing similarities with gravity, whether this means anything or not is unclear). When you move from one coordinate system to one that is rotating with respect to the first, then the equations of motion for a particle acquire an extra term: the coriolis term (and one other of second order in omega but we'll neglect that). So: if you wish to formulate the equations of motion for air on the surface of the earth, it is natural do to it in a coordinate system stationary wrt the earths surface: in that case, you end up with a coriolis force. You could, if you wished, write the equations in a system non-rotating wrt the fixed stars (perhaps ignoring the rotation of the earth round the sun). In this system, there would be no coriolis effect and hence no coriolis force. However there would be a very rapidly moving lower boundary to account for and this would be deeply inconvenient. since the coriolis term is easy to incorporate, there is no particular reason to do this. But... this is only the coordinate system in which you choose to write your equations. It has no effect on the physics, and cyclones continue to rotate no matter which system you describe them in. The coriolis effect is *not physics*: it is kinematics. 19:51:33, 2005-07-31 (UTC). [end of copied section] William M Connolley is simultaneously saying that the coriolis effect is physics, and that it isn't. An article about the coriolis effect should explain the following:. If (hypotherically speaking) a low pressure area would form on a non-rotating planet, then the air would flow towards the low pressure area and the pressure gradient would very rapidly be leveled. But that is not what is happening on Earth. On Earth, air starts flowing around a low pressure area, amazingly, it tends strongly to flow perpendigular to the pressure gradient, and it can take weeks for a low pressure area to become leveled again So there must be a physical mechanism that performs a restructuring of the direction of wind flow. A general coordinate transform transforms the entire picture in one go, if you employ a coordinate transformaton to a rotating coordinate system on, say, a large grid, then the grid will turns around as a whole, with the whole picture remaining in a fixed form. That is not what happens in the atmosphere! If you let go lots of weather balloons in the area of a low pressure area forming, then over time the positions of the balloons in the circling winds will be thoroughly mixed. The more central parts of the system rotate faster. William says that the coriolis effect is to be understood as purely a cosmetic change: a coordinate transformation, that does not alter the physics taking place. But Willam also believes the following: from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_M._Connolley/Coriolis_effect The Coriolis force plays a strong role in weather patterns, where it affects prevailing winds and the rotation of storms, as well as in the direction of ocean currents. Above the atmospheric boundary layer, friction plays a relatively minor role, as air parcels move mostly parallel to each other. Here, an approximate balance between pressure gradient force and Coriolis force exists, causing the geostrophic wind, which is the wind effected by these two forces only, to blow along isobars (along lines of constant geopotential height, to be precise). Thus a northern hemispheric low pressure system rotates in a counterclockwise direction, while northern hemispheric high pressure systems or cyclones on the southern hemisphere rotate in a clockwise manner, as described by Buys-Ballot's law. This is why I recognize that there are two contexts, that both called 'coriolis effect'. One context is about physical mechanisms, the other is about coordinate transformation. | Talk +REDIRECT Talk:The Legend of Korra (season 2) +What? Please be more specific. This borders on vandalising my user page. Talk 22:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) +" A tag has been placed on N.O.B., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. talkcont " +" Ok, that all makes sense to me; and there is a prominent link to the British Raj page. Sometimes one can forget that the British Empire is historical and no more. In contrast the US never had an ""official"" empire, so speaking of a present-day ""American Empire"" does not sound anachronistic. The fact that there was a real British Empire makes it easier to look at present Britain as ""non-imperial"", despite a few obvious counter-example BOTs. ""...black humour over the fact that they all thrash us at cricket"" made me laugh. " +First of all I did mention there were 5700 SNPs in the Seldin 2006 research. the 749 were the actively used. 2. I did not question the quality of the Bauchet 2007 research. 3. I do not propose the current pic should be replaced with the 3D graphs. All i'm saying is since they are both valid researches they should both be presented. 4. the motive of the re-adding of the Seldin 3D graphs is purely for illustrative purposes to any reader of the article. It's a genetics article, not the Front Page News. Why should it be Laconic and so space economic? it's just a pic more =/ why not? 5. Compare the illustrative strength of the 3D graphs> Image:European_population_substructure.png with that of the cluster structures. this> Image:Bauchet European clusters.png and this> Image:Seldin geography.png both are poor illustrations by no-matter-how-good researches. Finding a better chart to show the Bauchet results would be the best thing. but do we have anything else? i don't have any political/racist motive. Wobble, you didn't even delete the pic. the Spanish guy did. Anyway, I just think the 3D charts are nice and easy for the reader to see how genetic samples scatter throughout the nations of Europe. like that> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cavallisforzageneclusters.jpg pic. All the other illustrations are confusing and not directly useful to draw conclusions from. just a thought. +Genres Hi, I think Thrash Metal should be kept because the album is thrash metal even if it is only in very small doses and the Sputnik Music review references it as such. +GOCE drive newsletter Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on +| decline=Nobody on Wikipedia wants your moronic edits! Take a hike! +" Chimp - You Need To Learn Some Respect Civility Warning It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! I've been reviewing your pattern of recent edits and see a lot of comments that could be interpretted as extremely incivil. I'd encourage you to assume good faith on the part of other editors, particularly in the maintenance of this talk page and your responses to other users on both their talk pages and in AfDs. Thank you ). (talk) Warning Removal Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. (talk) I would suggest that you lay off my personal talk page .... Like anyone who actually understood what it means to be civil and polite, which you apparently do not. 20:35, 17 September 2006" +Gentlemen don't lay hands on a woman they don't know well. What part of Tyra Banks' body did he touch? +To BongWarrior, Listen you fuckface, maybe you should get a fucking life, lose some fucking weight, stop doing drugs in your mother fucking basement, and go outside. I know its been years, and it was too hard to have social interactions like college, but you shouldnt have sacrificed your education because your a fat douchebag that no one can stand and everyone makes fun of. I hope your house burns down and all your comics and fucking action figures go down with it you worthless piece of shit +Image:Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie with first born, Shiloh.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie with first born, Shiloh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +but it was my own article that i changed from one version into another. +Hello Jackson214. I advise you not to be intimidated by passive aggressive incorrect accusations of vandalism. As far as I can see from Wikipedia rules, removing incorrect (and therefore poorly substantiated) information from BLP pages is perfectly acceptable, and accusing you of vandalism for doing so is 'not' acceptable. +Some Dude reckons me and you are the same Dude, Dude Look at mattinbgn's talk page, what losers. +As a matter of fact I AGREED with the editor. +Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker Wanker +Re. Physics Yeah. I've got Shim and Wang every other block Why? +REDIRECT Liberty (Machinima Series) +ello whats our name +You deleted the Engineering Jackets page link that was citing the source. If you want to look at it again it can be found at http://www.queensu.ca/admission/index.php?option=com_content&task;=view&id;=113&Itemid;=59 and http://appsci.queensu.ca/prospective/tradition/jackets/ Please, once again do not vandalize articles and delete them without group consensus on a matter. You deleted the section even though they were cited and that does frustrate me. As a student at the school I want to see the best possible representation of the school on Wikipedia and I do not appreciate the work of myself or others being deleted needlessly. Thank you. +" Edit Summary When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled ""Edit summary"" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. " +stop fuicky reverting my fucking edits it +" Message to JackBRootJss Yes, I agree with you JackBRootJss. This is bullshit, we need to start a community called ""Banned MarnetteD Community"". You and I can team up together and you can help me ban him from the wiki! " +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | Talk +" Adminship is not a life-long appointment. Any admin can be revoked if he does things that are not appropriate for an admin to do. For example, you misinterpreting my freedom of speech as being ""incivil"" is not an appropriate thing for an admin to do. You threatening to block me for reminding you of your ""mortality"" is a VERY inappropriate thing for an admin to do. Your statements regarding the WikiProject Hawaii Manual of Style are WAY OFF. You need to take a truth pill, man. There is no violation in editing an article when it specifically invites users to edit it. Have you even looked at it? It's not even an ""article"". It's a mere ""stub"". It's history page had only one entry before I contributed. Nobody has touched that stub in over 7 months. You said I ""changed it completely"". That's FALSE. Making FALSE statements is a VERY inappropriate thing for an admin to do. I did NOTHING that ""goes against the manual of style that was there"". There is NOTHING there that says don't make changes. There is NOTHING at WikiProject Hawaii requiring ""a survey"". There has been NO TALK AT ALL on that MoS since the STUB was created. It's been DEAD, with NO CONTRIBUTIONS, and NO USER INTEREST, for over 7 months. And now you criticize me for participating as a member of the Wikipedia community, and as an expert on the Hawaiian language, for making a positive contribution and bringing some LIFE to a dead, neglected stub? You need to review what Wikipedia is about. It's not about treating admins as a superior race. Admins are subject to the same rules as users. Even the President of the USA is just a man, Ryulong. " +I was wondering that as well. I came here hoping to find a comparison of how long you can be held without charge in various countries. I understand India has a particularly long time under the Goonda act, while the UK recently increased the length to 28 days without charge. 91.85.35.46 +here's my proof Xepol Says: April 7th, 2009 at 10:10 pm I seem to recall RJ saying it was his intention to release the last book as a single book even if needed a new form of book binding to be invented or sold on library carts. If I recall correct, then I can’t help but feel this is NOT at all what he intended to happen. I can wait for it be bound into a single handcover book. In fact, if that simple intent can’t be honoured, I have to wonder about the story line itself. Maybe I can do without “book 12″ entirely. Louis Says: April 7th, 2009 at 10:44 am Anyone who believes this staggered three volume release is being done for anything other than profit is kidding themselves. If it is not about profits release all three volumes at once, don’t wait for the money that will be generated from three separate hard cover and paperback releases for each volume. This is not about Jordan or his loyal fans. This is about TOR milking it for everything it is worth. This is a slap in the face to every Sci/FI and Fantasy reader that has supported TOR through the years. Louis Says: April 7th, 2009 at 8:19 am Releasing this in three volumes is a terrible and sad idea. Readers of the wheel of time series have been waiting 15 plus years to a conclusion to this extraordinary series. Now you are asking them to wait three more yea`rs. This is all being done in the name of profit. Jordan did not want it to go done this way. I am deeply saddened by TOR’S greedy decision. michael Says: April 6th, 2009 at 9:09 pm i think brandon sanderson’ s name shouldnt appear in front with jordans but inside as for waiting well patients is a virtue Jake Says: April 6th, 2009 at 7:01 pm BOYCOTT ALL TOR AND SANDERSON BOOKS UNTIL SERIES IS COMPLETE!! i’m sorry but if this was really for the fan we’d have heard from TOR books, Harriet and Sanderson on such an OBVIOUS negative response. Consider this Harriet has no control over this book other then an editorial opinion if TOR books decides to replace something they can and will. More then likely there was a large advance granted to mr jordan upon the start of the book and unless the book is finished Harriet more then likely would have had to return that money due tyo the book being unfinished. Sorry folks but medical bills aren’t cheap and when some Corporation has you under contract you have no choice but to at least pretend you have some sort of control. Face it this is a business and the world is in a recession what is the garunteed way to bring in SOME MONEY? Plump up a story and add meaningless splits and’ milk it for everything it is worth, Corporate GREED at its finest again. don’t punish Harriet and not buy the books but BOYCOTT ANY OTHER WORK BY TOR OR SANDERSON UNTIL THE LAST VOLUME IS COMPLETE. WHO KNOWS THEY MIGHT EVEN HAVE IT FINISHED BY NEXT YEAR IF ALL THE FANS BOYCOTT BOOK PURCHASING FROM THEM. PLEASE CONTINUE TO EXPRESS YOUR ANGER UNTIL WE HEAR A TRUTHFUL ANSWER FROM ANYONE OF THESE KNUCKLE HEADS. I can keep going if this isn't prrof enough +I'm no longer going to Wikipedia anymore. +Hi, Baz! I know that Terrorizer is a world-wide known and very well selling magazine, I’m not a kid or crazy guy. I just mean that if they don’t know (or just pretend that don’t know) that Lucifugum is one of the most known East European black metal bands and give them just a half of a sentence of 3 pages they don’t look terribly competent in this subject. Just in this subject, I don’t talk about their whole competence. Don’t you agree? As for the album a year on own label: Lucifugum is a self-releasing band just last 5 years (of 15 years existence). And it doesn’t make them less notable than they were in past. In interviews they explained their decision to make self-releases. It’s just because of a disappointment in labels which didn’t keep their word and promises (but NOT because of lack of interest to the band). “Vector 33” (the first album of female fronted Lucifugum) was planned to be released on Drakkar prod., but Drakkar didn’t release it in due time. That’s why Lucifugum have canceled the deal with Drakkar and released “Vector 33” cd by themselves. It was the first Propaganda cd release. Also in Lucifugum interviews I read that they don’t exclude the cooperation with labels in future if they find a noble label with honest principles. By the way, “Stigma Egoism” on Drakkar prod. is not a re-release, this is the first (and last at the moment) cd edition of this album (Propaganda released just tape version). Also Lucifugum released in 2003 two albums on BlackMetal.Com on cd format (a big independent American label with many releases and good financial might). I mean a critery for musicans, Lucifugum released 3 albums on big indie labels. P.S. They record an album a year (or almost a year) not just now, in early times they did the same things. Just look at their discography, they really work hard. By the way, my 1488 really means nothing, just nothing, believe you me or not. Thanks for your time and all the best. +. It makes me question the validity ALL content found on Wiki pages now. And sadly, most Americans do not have the knowledge to know that they should question it; they will read it as fact, and spread it to others as though it is +" Middle Bass Island Norman, you have removed the link to the main Middle Bass Island web site several times. That means you don't even look at the contents of the items you remove, which is rather petty and incredibly arrogant. The site started as a non-commercial site and contains a great deal of island history as well as many, many island pictures. It's one of the most popular sites in the Lake Erie Islands. Please take a look at ""Site Map Page 1"" and ""Site Map Page 2"" before removing the link again. Saying that the hundreds of pages listed there have only commercial value is idiotic. The site was started out of love for the Lake Erie Islands and Middle Bass Island and the fact that it now carries a number of ads for island businesses does not change the fact that it is mainly a site with island information not available anywhere else. So what is your real rationale for deleting it again and again and again??? Mike Gora, Middle Bass Island Webmaster" +Beckjord calls for revert warring on this article on Bigfoot, with easy-to-follow instructions for full-scale edit warring. Compare my notice on the administrator's noticeboard. | talk +for it is very foolish of you to block somebody who is the friend of the victim who knows him. you dont not know the humor of these guys so please for godness sakes just be resonable. besides do yuo think i vandalize the pages of MLK or malcome X of course not now that would be stupid} +" I support your viewpoint: the problem is that term you used: ""personal inflation rate"". There is no such thing. The fact that it is used by some UK government department does not mean it is correct or generally accepted. Present your proposal about ""Issues in measuring inflation"" without using that term. I am sure it will be generally accepted. Even better if you can back it up with a credible reference. Even if you do not have a reference and you wish to add something new that is valid and generally accepted it will be accepted. " +I DID JUST THAT IN THE PREVIOUS VERSION (SOLZHENITSYN, ETC.), YOU COMMIE RASCAL, BUT YOU REMOVED THEM ALL WHEN YOU EDITED THIS PAGE! WELL I PUT'EM BACK AGAIN MYSELF, AND DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH ANY SOURCED STATEMENT IN THIS ARTICLE OR YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE!!! 67.170.215.166 +Okay OhC. Good idea. +Only to whet your curiosity, a Catholic seminarian friend had looked at the open Page while I had moved away for some time. Disgusted by the lies and propaganda and the graphic description of the rape [the Khandmal victims have already been granted $12000 each as compensation by the Hindu government; and a rape doubles the money], he did some Christian editing and left, which our dear priest/missionaries did not yet object to because the figures had only been increased. The insertion of rape everywhere was an expression of his disgust. Hindus might not rape decorations unless they convert and become priests. +Janet Devlin AfD Hi Anemone, you recently zapped Janet Devlin (singer) (converted it into a redirect), which was subject to an ongoing AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Devlin (singer). Will you be closing the AfD too? I realise you may not have been aware of the AfD, because user Gsklubb had removed the AfD template an hour or so before your actions. I agree the article was premature, but I'm interested to know why you redirected the article before the outcome of an AfD. Has it been subject to an AfD in the past? +" You could have writen an ""improved"" version of what we all have been discussing said in a separate statement. I don't think it's necessary or even appropriate to change one's response. Try to write a seperate ""correction"" next time ok, please? " +":::::::I second that. Since Edward has clearly broken his promise to be civil, this section will be deleted in 24 hours unless he issues a full apology. While you may disagree with us, I trust you are man enough to keep your word Edward or are you too ""intelligent"" for that? " +They all, always, took on any odds. They were too brave and reckless +NIHH Science Update • December 15, 2010 Scientists at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore led by Mikhail Pletnikov developed the mouse model used in this study by inserting a gene with a mutation known to be associated in humans with schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder. They used a technique that allows them to turn the gene on and off at desired time points during brain development. In earlier research, mice with the gene, mhDISC1 (mutant human disrupted-in-schizophrenia-1) showed effects on social behavior and mood which differed depending on the sex of the mice, and the age at which the gene was active. The study shows brain development is more complex than originally thought and the argument between nature v. nature is not an easy question. The mutated gene has more control than originally thought. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2010/transgenic-mouse-offers-a-window-on-gene-environment-interplay-prenatal-infection-alters-behavior-in-genetically-vulnerable.shtml NIMH Science Update * Breaking Ground, Breaking Through: The Strategic Plan for Mood Disorders Research, 2003 pages 28 - 31 http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/strategic-planning-reports/breaking-ground-breaking-throughthe-strategic-plan-for-mood-disorders-research.pdf +Verbal Interviw Hi Gwen I had a serious question. An unregistered user came across something interesting which was an interview of Lil' Kim's mother. She states that Lil'Kim was born in 1976 see here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKT7WFyolLo&feature;=related This was an interview by VH1 so it's exclusive but can it be used?? Everything else I've been able to locate that can be used states 1975. +" novaseminary pov pushing,and section blanking. So everyone is aware of his pov editing, I have copied some of his history here. I ask other editors not to restore his versions as they are pov and section blanking. Here is a little histoy on novaseminry. More can easily be found. I include it here to show the type of editor he is. Request topic ban of User:Novaseminary for persistent disruptive editing at Douglas Tait (stuntman) User:Novaseminary has tried unsuccessfully to get the Douglas Tait (stuntman) BLP deleted twice before. Here, and here. But having failed at deletion twice, for two years now, Novaseminary has also failed at WP:LETITGO. He persistently challenges the BLP's notability and threatens to start a 3rd deletion attempt. He also regularly violates WP:DE. He edit wars and disruptively edits almost on a daily basis, pushes POV, attacks other articles because they are mentioned in the BLP, creates suspect disambig stubs, insists on irrelevant or dated edits, violates OR, uses citation tags to edit war, like here, here, here and here, removes sourced quotes and attacks and fights to include and spreads unflattering and irrelevant material about the BLP's subject over several editor's objections. But Novaseminary is also knowledgeable of WP rules. So knowledgeable that he uses WP to argue & defend his indefensible actions, even as he ignores all the WP rules & policies that his tendentious editing violates. He cites the rules that give him cover, and just ignores those that expose his tactics as disruptive. Recommend an immediate topic ban. Not just for the Douglas Tait (stuntman) BLP, but for all the articles sourced in the BLP. Otherwise he will just retaliate by continuing to disrupt them. 2602:304:5EA1:52A9:A449:F5CE:8339:FCA2 (talk) This looks like a content dispute. Have you taken this to WP:DRN as a first port of call? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) Unfortunately, it's more than a content issue. It's a persistent, long-term pattern of disruptive behavior. So per WP:DDE, ANI ""may be the best first step."" 2602:304:5EA1:52A9:A449:F5CE:8339:FCA2 (talk) The article would probably benefit from both these editors leaving it alone. Drmies (talk) Fact is, unless admins enforce it, don't count on it. Otherwise I wouldn't have had to come here. I've suggested several times that Novaseminary just take a Wikibreak from the article. He refused. 2602:304:5EA1:52A9:3533:DED5:47AA:B44 (talk) I found this at WP:RFPP and have spent more time than I'm willing to admit looking through it all. 3RR violations from dynampic IPs are really disruptive, but similarly I think we can do without Noveseminary's bizarre obsession with this person. I'm going to give Novaseminary time to respond, but I strongly lean towards a topic ban for both users. – Steel You know what? I'll accept that. If Novaseminary is topic banned, I'll voluntarily self-ban. My only request is that the last edit before the ban is monitored/reviewed by uninvolved 3rd party/parties to insure no Novaseminary POV. Thanks. 2602:304:5EA1:52A9:3533:DED5:47AA:B44 (talk) I've never violated a single guideline or policy at this article. The IP seems to care more about how this person is presented favorably than about the nietrality of WP, but it tough to know what else if anything this IP has edited. This article was one of several resume-like PR/POV articles i've come across over the years. I, and others, tried to make it neutral and then kept it on my watchlist. Almost everything i've done i've discussed at talk. I have only even edited this over the last few weeks because an IP came along and removed well sourced text without discussion until posted at a NB. Novaseminary (talk) I would also point out, I only nominated this article for deletion once, with no consensus. I actually came across it at the first successful AfD nom made, not by me, but another editor. The IP seems to think I have had it out for this person, but I have been only one of several editors to do things the IP apparently disapproves of, but that I think comply with policy. (At one point the article cited several non-RS articles written by a single publicist, for instance.) Novaseminary (talk) Our IP user has agreed to a self-ban from this article providing you do the same. From your comments above that the IP's edits are the only reason you've even been editing the page recently, this should be an acceptable resolution for you too. Right? – Steel Yes. Novaseminary? I do agree that you have an all-too strong interest in that article. Drmies (talk) 17:16, 13 October +In light of the cheating to go undefeated, one has to ask two questions. Could they have done it without cheating? Have they ever done it without cheating? +No, the Times is the only paper that has put its extensive archive online fully. +" We cannot - there is no way to delete accounts. -' (Blah v^_^v) Your WP:CHU request I removed the request because you malformed the template by hitting Return rather than using vertical bars. -' (Blah v^_^v) " +is true. so i want to express that grant is gay grant is gayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy +You are the one who is violiting the neutral point of view. +" You are a total ignoramus. Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by AYArktos for the following reason (see our blocking policy): personal attack reference to ""immature"" editing on Tal page Gundagai - has been warned Your IP address is 203.54.186.143. And a fool. And a crawler. Grow up." +Fuck off, asshole. You did not act in good faith, you vandalized the article. People like you need to be outed and kicked out. +Were that true you would not be uttering a fantastic story about the BBC cooking up lies to make it seem to be so. +" Speedy deletion of Hauffe A tag has been placed on Hauffe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Speak " +And last but not least, yes, he WAS a crook. +" I think it should be split too. For a similar example see Let it Be and Let it Be (film) Talk To Me " +Moron Leave Wikipedia. Your edits are stupid and contribute nothing. +Re-tagging for speedy deletion Please do not re-tag an article for speedy deletion because you don't like the decision made by the admin who evaluated the article. That would appear, to me, to be gaming the system. +" ""Part of the US position...""....which part? exactly who? cite references. 03:41 Mar 29, 2003 (UTC)" +Ratigan was fired for one reason only- he was in the process of doing an expose' on Goldman Sachs, and his producers were ordered to fire him and get him off CNBC. I'm sorry you lifelong wikipedia editors can't understand how the real word works, or what my previous sentence even means, but why don't you take a break from your OCD and allow truth to be told? +Reporting False Positive Hi everyone OK, I'm trying to report this false positive. However, when I click on the link to enter the revert ID, I get a 404 error message? are you guys aware of this? +You DL the videos from here actually.. http://www.lincoln.edu/history/his307/ ^5 thousand years ago? What's the point and what does that have to do with the article or the near east? +" Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (talk/contributions) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices." +You're talking about the quote at the end of the Personal relationships section. I would guess that it means he's saying he's open to sexual relationships with men. A reference to bisexuality. But no one knows for certain what his sexual orientation was (except those who claim they know), which is why we have a section on speculation about it. +This message is regarding the page Zack freeman. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. (talk) +" Tedder, and Intelligent Vehicle Technologies Tedder, you do not seem to understand Intellectual Property that is currently registered in the USPTO (I never said I owned the page). What I own is the name trademark ""Intelligent Vehicle Technologies"". I wish to allow the page to remain, as wp has provided me a tremendous service for people to understand telematic safety systems. This is the main reason that I also monetarily support wp every year, because it is a cause well worth it for the promotion of new technology. I wrote the Article, and I'm happy that you so dearly defend it my friend. Thank You! ) Lperez2029" +Let's re-build the Ultramarines page I'm new to wikis so forgive me, but after almost 20 years of being in the hobby, I strongly believe that the Ultramarines page as well as the other Chapters and Legions should re-built again and protected from people who wish to delete them. +" It's an adjective to describe not only him but his actions and attitude, therefore it fits the criteria. A personal ""attack"", it's the end of the world huh? Someone called someone an idiot! Grow up and get lost." +| decline=When an account is compromised we just leave it blocked per widespread security practice. You can start a new one without prejudice as long as you disclose that this one was once yours. — }} +Arkham Origins Hey. Just wanted you to know that I never got around to looking over the page, but I don't think it is in dire need anyways. Turns out having a break from school is equally busy as being in school. Anyways. One thing I think we should look at are the skins listed. Most of them were from sources before the game released, and a good amount of them have not appeared in the game, and don't seem to exist. I'm going to go through those and would like your help to confirm or deny the ones kept or removed (at least for the time being). - +" Quoted by two administrators Without looking at anything else, ""Football Domination"" is not an appropriate section title, IMO. Also, without looking at anything else, agree that ""Football Domination"" is not appropriate. (I've also again grouped these threads.) As for ""RealCowboys (who have an history of being blocked and not behaving) should not delete information and lable it as false when the subject has been discussed and proven correct, or delete information on a rival football clubs Wikipedia page without any discussion before deleting it as he is biased."" In what way was me deleting ""Football Domination"" biased? The section title it self is biased, Any other succesful team could claim its self as ""Football Domination"", why I disagree with you is because your trying to justify that FC Barcelona is an unstopable team, did you know they lost againts Getafe? A lower rank team or they couldnt defeat Espanol? Another lower rank team? I would imagine that if they did dominate they would be on top when in fact as of right now they and currently in second. Im going to tell you one more time, DO NOT refer or mention me in any of your juvenile post. If you have a problem use the talk page without using another editors name. " +" According to all this, I think the article should have only people from Hispanic America born or naturalized in the United States. Currently the article is a mess, because it considers lots of people from Spain / Hispanic America as ""Hispanic Americans"" (according to US definition) just because they have won an Oscar or stuff like that. If this article wants to be serious, it should only contain Hispanic Americans born or naturalized in the United States of America. " +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Merry Headcheese!-Chord2 " +" PLEASE INDEF BLOCK THIS ACCOUNT" +'''Please add new comments at the bottom of the page and sign with four tildes ~~~~. Note that you can be bold and fix mistakes yourself. +Fuck the Killers and Fuck you too. +Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Additional text +" Just noticed you took the sex magic in See also off 'neopaganism' as well, and said that neopaganism ""may or may not include it"". That's one reason for a See also list, topics not fully covered in the text but related, available for those who want to link through. This removal may be stretching it, don't you think? I won't put it back, but would like a full discussion. On the Wicca page? Thanks again, " +", 21 July 2009 (UTC) Thanks so much! Splendid attention to detail all around. I plan to implement your suggestions for expansion as soon as I get some free time. (habla conmigo) 15:07" +This is a horrible page Can nobody fix this? I'm not an article writer, but this article is horrible in many ways, including being cut off. Thanks. +I'm not worried about it at all, now that the warning is there. - +I think you love me. -Lover. +and the multiple objections from many experianced contributors +" Discussion Any additional comments: OPPOSE - ""However, when the catalog has mostly numerals (i.e., PSR B1620-26c and HD 209458b), the space is often (astronomically) omitted, but often this is not done in the general public."" - Once again you are misinterpreting things to get your way, and as usual it looks like sabotage and vandalism. This quote said for planets that are mostly numerical, and acnowledges that the general public does not use this format. It says nothing that the space has to be omitted. And certainly these plants are written everywhere on the internet with a space between the star number and the planet letter, Everywhere. You have not provided any referencing links to exterior examples for this concoction. You are try to flip this encyclopedia's astromomy articles upside down for some twisted reason, and not everyone sees it as just your editing. Thankfully all of your damage can be undone. And stop adding fantasy to this article with the sci-fi name Yasmir as though it is has scientific significance - ""unofficially named"" is meaningless here when you are just promoting one person's insignificant work of fiction. 198.163.53.11 " +Hi Andy! Thats nice. Good to see how qualified you are to edit this page since you have a clear hatred for the group. Keep vandalizing so I can keep reporting you! +" Countries with other modes of celebrating The article says: ""Father's Day is celebrated on a variety of dates worldwide, and typically involves gift-giving to fathers and family-oriented activities."" Well, except for Germany, where it doesn't involve gift-giving and is actually an excuse to get away from the family and have a piss-up. Just FYI, I can't tell if that's Wikipedia-worthy information. " +" My removal of a single word in these articles was not questionable in the least. There have been and continue to be, to varying degrees of seriousness, numerous different and recurring problems with your editing, so it should not come as a surprise that there are numerous people, including me, monitoring your contributions. For the most part, I intentionally avoid interacting with you because your response is always needlessly aggressive and unpleasant. As always, I will continue to attempt to discuss things calmly and constructively however difficult you insist on making it. bigissue " +On the subject of horsepower vs torque, Tallgirl is absolutely correct, as horsepower isn't a real and direct measurement, it is a calculation from measurable variables. +Otherwise, blocks should be considered for them. +" PR Two sections of this article—""Charity"" and ""Treatment of laboratory animals""—are blatant corporate spin, probably added by Covance itself. If no one objects in the next few days I will delete them. – " +Regarding your edits to Poison (Final Fight) Yeah, don't vandalize. And a forum counts as much as a reliable source as a random guy on the street. The fact the person posting it is a moderator means very little, as moderators don't always equal staff, and that guy certainly isn't staff. +Umm Dumb ass noob here with my dick stuck in a bear trap with a coven of evil warlocks breathing down my neck intent on my utter destruction and making me sad too boot, and hateful of my self. But hurting others, so I must act. I guess. Help? Advice! Hug? Slap, a la Patton? +" Dubious claim The claim that Russia invented the lightning rod is doubtful for two reasons. First, it is unverifiable that Nevyansk tower, built between 1725 and 1732 was intended for the specific purpose of being utilized a lightning rod. Whather it was used as a lightning rod, it remains unverifiable. Secondly, I probably would believe such a claim if there was a in fact citation referenced in this article that is written in the English language. All we are given is an inappropriate and unacceptable reference in the form of a web page written in Russian that to English speakers, is totally useless to verify such a claim. This is English Wikipedia, not Russian Wikipedia. And thirdly, by conducting my own research, there is a vast consensus by doing a search engine which shows that by far and large, Benjamin Franklin is attributed to inventing the lightning rod, regardless if others may have built a rod that was unintended for such a purpose. Because of this, I have added a tag to the ""Russia"" section of this article. " +I respect germany and regard them as my brothers. The same coldblooded warriors as us 77.248.185.98 +" Yes, wonderful and kudos to you.Nvvchar. " +So, four neo-con revisionists refuse to believe that Conrad Black is prison for fraud, millions of people realize that Conrad Black has been convicted of fraud and is in prison. You four clowns probably believe that the holocaust never happened as well. I am certain that there are four other editors who agree with you lot,perhaps you should work on revising that article to your liking as well. +Okay Doug, I've taken it over to WP:RSN as per your suggestion. +, and I think the present system works reasonably well +I have not problem with the Beowulf. It's says that Hygelac was king of the geats. But he was properly also king of some Danes, probably from Skåne area, Since it's also says that he was from the danish dynasty. And both Saxo and Anglo writers, call him dane and not geat. But no matter what. This can't be used to call all Danes for Scandinavians. Its also 300 years before Rollo. Comanche cph +Thanks! Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) +Which one? As far as I can see both of your current articles are still there but I have tagged National Association Of Farmers to be deleted because it doesn't make much sense, has no references and it is not clear how big or important the organisation is. I can't delete anything myself, as I am not an administrator, so it will only be deleted if an administrator agrees that it should be. Special Real State Agent was deleted by somebody else. I never even saw that one. +Jeffreesworld Special:Contributions/Jeffreesworld +I just tried something out - -^ +Artist G-friend - Debut - (January,2015) +" I prefer to keep EvThread cites to an absolute minimum, with the goal of eliminating them altogether, since they aren't considered reliable sources (even if it is Lee who is writing them). I rather figured that McLawhorn wouldn't return...I imagine being an active core member of Seether is more along the lines of what he wants to be doing. You know, the interesting thing here is that Science has been brought in as lead drummer, with Will Hunt acting as secondary stage performer (two drummers playing at once, whaaa?). But hey 121, I really appreciate you doing this legwork. You might want to consider signing up with an account here and being an active editor, though that is, of course, up to you. The help is always welcome. — (t @ c) " +I personally am open to your suggestion. Could you help me understand what holy or Holy means? +" Obviously a punishment by pharisee's denying the Literal meaning of 2 simple words, and when loosing the argument they punish the contributor - as though they've been ""offended"" (taking offense is offensive). Son = offspring, man = mankind. Its just simple language. Prohibition of the truth discredits the rest of the wicked pages. 74.111.4.108 " +This journal has been a mainstay for at least 25 years in progressive/left of center academia, and is definitely as notable as much of what is in Wikipedia. It isn't hyperbolic the way something like a David Horowitz type publication is, nor does it have a dynamic web presence, but we shouldn;t confuse noise with notability! I can't research it adequately at the moment, but here is some background. +" Except this article is extremely biased because it references the same Andy Greenwald junk 70 times. You want to talk about Wikipedia standards, show me any good historical article on here with a lot of references that goes to one same reference for more than 50% of the time (and over 70 times total). That's absurd. Just rename this ""Emo (as defined by Andy Greenwald)"" and be done with it. The ""style"" did not change into pop-punk and indie bands; the media did that by screwing up the word. The real bands continued playing and evolved in sound (many taking a heavier approach which is only hinted at in the lead but never once mentioned again), but it was still in the same genre and rooted in hardcore. That's the whole point of having sub-genres. They build from a larger genre. This article makes zero distinction that while emo continued and evolved naturally, it was at one point rebranded in the media into something completely different from where it started. " +" Accent Moving this page back to the accented version...not because I particularly care (it seems rather unimportant), but simply because he's listed that way on his MLSnet bio, which I have now listed as a source. If anyone has strong feelings, just move it back and explain here. ''' 《Defender of Open Editing》''' " +You blocked 249 of my sockpuppets and now i'm going to kill you in front of a bunch o 6 to 8 yearolds you ducking mustard ........ +Brogden The only reason you have given for the worthinness of that piece of news if that -Pat Robertson- was on ITN (which many Wikipedians also agreed with). The top international new items today seem to be the hurricane, the Iraqi constitution, the Japanese election and the threat of resumption of conflict in the Congo. Some minor Australia politican being a racist is not suitable for the main page and your actions did seem to violate WP:POINT. +Please do not censor necessary views nor ownown articles. There's a discussion page to build up a consensus. In regard to diff. In the discussion it was clear that Petras' opinions had to be included. It could well be discussed ( think someone did) wether the lack of non-Jewish opinions is not due to undue weight (WP:OWN) in favor of certain tendency. The paragraph on Petras was proportionate and, in any case, it doesn't entitle you to just delete it. That is WP:Tendentious editing. Please don't do that again ever. +" Proof that he's sourcing another Armenian? Here you go. These are from Balakian's ""Burning Tigris"": http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0060558709&id;=DrYoyAM3PBYC&pg;=PP1&lpg;=PP1&ots;=wrctpbUcha&dq;=burning+tigris&sig;=tyMNsbxNERhXuwtkjBw-f5ufU8g#PPR17,M1 Page XVII: ""Vahakn Dadrian, has made available in translation..."" Page 343: ""As Vahakn Dadrian has put it,..."" Page 396: ""Vahakn Dadrian, “The Armenian Question and the Wartime Fate of the Armenians as Documented by the Officals of the Ottoman Empire's World War I Allies"" Page 398: ""Dadrian, History of the Armenian Genocide pg. 120..."" Page 401: ""quoted in Dadrian, His-tory of the Armenian Genocide pg. 139."" Page 402: ""Dadrian, History of the Armenian Genocide, pg. 139-40"" Page 407: ""Vahakn Dadrian, “The Role of Turkish Physicians in the World War I Genocide of Ottoman Armenians,...” "" Page 411: ""Vahakn Dadrian, “Genocide as a Problem on National and International Law;..."" Page 412: ""Vahakn Dadrian, “The Role of the Special Organisation in the Armenian Genocide during the..."" Page 414: ""puts the number at 34000, quoted in Dadrian, “The Role of the Special Organization in the..."" Page 418: ""Vahakn Dadrian, “Documentation of..."" Page 420: ""see Dadrian, German..."" Page 425: ""Vahakn Dadrian, “The Turkish Military Tribunal's Prosecution of the Authors of the Armenian Genocide: Four Major Court-Martial Series,"" Page 431: ""see also Dadrian, “Genocide as a Problem of National and International Law..."" Page 434: ""Since most of the cup's files and records disappeared after the war, these forty-two documents comprised the major evidence; Dadrian, “Genocide as a Problem..."" Page 435: ""Dadrian, “A Textual Analysis of the Key Indictment,”"" Page 442: ""collected essays by Vahakn N. Dadrian, in journal of Political and Military Sociology "" Page 458: ""Dadrian, Vahakn. “Genocide as a Problem of National and..."" Page 463: ""sense of Armenia, 29—33 Dadrian, Vahakn, pg. xvii, pg. 113, pg. 335, pg. 343"" As For JM Winter from ""America and the Armenian Genocide of 1915"": Page ""CONTENTS"": ""The Armenian Genocide: an interpretation 52 VAHAKN N. DADRIAN Part H..."" Page 4:"" Vahakn Dadrian then provides an interpretation of the genocide as a cluster of crimes"" Page 52: ""an interpretation Vahakn N Dadrian Introduction The Armenian Genocide"" Page 53: ""Dadrian, “The Historical and Legal ..."" Page 55: ""claim of relocation, see Vahakn N. Dadrian, The History of the Ar,,, "" Page 56: ""Dadrian, “The Documentation of the World War I..."" Page 59: ""Dadrian, “The Convergent Roles of the Stare and a Governmental Party..."" there's much more. The funny part is, they are sourcing from Dadrian's ""interpretation"". " +hi i wanna suck ur cock ) +}} {{Archive box collapsible| All Archives 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 2011 January 2011 2012 September 2012 October 2012 +September 2012 (UTC) i do apologise for my language, please understand how frustrating it was trying to explain wp:legal to Andreclos and having it fly completely over his head and how frustrating his irrational and stubborn behaviour in the context of the situaton was. would it be unreasonable to ask that the 'controversy over will' paragraph be re-added with a citation required tag and i be afforded the reasonable opportunity to produce one that i was originally denied, i believe that was the point this all turned into a shitstorm editing-war. thanks it is refreshing finally being able to speak to someone rationally124.182.142.3 12:12, 3 +I'm going to track you down I am going to track you down and do horrible violent things to you. This is a sincere threat which I would take seriously if I were you. BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT ISLAM 82.165.144.51 +(This paragraph not part of the one above it): For telling people to not be trolls, you don't even know how to sign your posts... +Although I don't live in Sweden, it seems like a rather notable thing there anyway. +" Brazil This article mentions that ""Sam Lowry of Brazil hums/listens to/sings the film's self-titled theme song"" but I'm not sure if that's metafictional. The song is not named after the film; rather, the film was named after the song. I don't think that this character's attraction to that song is at all related to any sort of idea of him being a character in a film. 70.61.247.31 ~Mike R." +" Reason for this article? Has anybody put forth a rational, NPOV argument for why this article's contents are incapable of being integrated into other articles about Japanese history and culture? We don't have articles for the Greek influence on Italian culture, the Chinese influence on Korean culture, the Indian influence on Chinese culture, the Arab influence on Persian culture, the Turkic influence on Anatolian culture, Japanese & American influence on modern Korean culture, etc. despite the fact that all of these influences were significant and frequently cited in academic literature - so why exactly is there a page for specifically ancient ""Korean"" influence on ""Japanese"" culture? I agree with the editors who state that the presence of such an article encourages tit-for-tat nationalism and it's as plain as day that such edit wars have already begun. Allowing this article to exist encourages future articles of the same sort and equally heated edit wars. I suggest moving the article's contents into other articles relevant to the subjects cited. For example, the section about ""Koreans"" being on the committee that drafted the Taiho Code can be placed under Taiho Code, where it belongs in the first place. " +chance What is this? Why you reverted my edit? What is this reason? 103.9.114.58 +29, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Ufuk Talay How much was talay released for when he went to join Mark Rudan at Avispa??? 08: +Almachanarianos A tag has been placed on Almachanarianos, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +" Nobel-related move Hi Economizer, ''Support a change to Nobel prize in Economics. Doing a Google Search, ""Nobel Prize in Economics"" (subtracting Wikipedia) gets 273,000 hits. ""Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel"" only gets 27,800 hits. The article should be titled in accordance with the most popular, and most searched for, title for the prize... Have you seen/read WP:GT...?  A popular title may be misleading, as I believe it is in this case, but will still redirect to something more accurate (such as ""Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics"", in this case). Thanks for your input, " +" Again, the cropped image is not a screenshot, and the {{film-screenshot}} licensing tag does not apply in this situation. Furst off, your claim is debatable as the image has been varifed by comic con viewers to have been clipped from the new trailer, but what would you recommend for this ""wallpaper""? Oh and what's with all this ""It'll be deleted"" jazz? You seem a little too quick to tell me that and the rtionale should be obvious. ; Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. " +Anonimu indef block I suppose you could care about another racist: . Look at his user page and talk page first (and his block log!!) +Adamantia Kontogiorgi is not currently on the show Adamatia Kontogiorgi is not currently on the show. The lady playing Renos' neighbour (Arazoglou's sister) looks a lot like Adamantia (and perhaps is related to her in real life - maybe even her sister), but she's not the same person. Anglicisation of Myrto and Koralia Myrto and 'Myrtle' are not the same name. Neither are Koralia and Coraline. Whoever wants those names anglicised, why not be consistent? Pavlos should then be 'Paul' and Stephanos should be 'Steven'. Myrto is such a nice sounding name. Myrtle sounds like the name of some 80-year old grandma in the southern United States. +Hunter!Were Opsticmistic ((Wow i dont now how to spell))Buddys!!Hunter go to my party....u have to do u now anyone else thats comin ??? talk back!!! Thanxs +"::It's not a ""theory"", it's your most effective weapon. If you're seen acting as if the other guys are good faith, you get so much kudos. Those translate into power. I'm not kidding, pretending to AGF is an effective weapon. It protects you from so much. Don't do it to be nice, do it to win. - " +Persecution of Hindus In your editing, you inadvertently allowed for the deletion of a huge paragraph of text (NobleEage's edit) dealing with Human Rights Watch's review of the Devdasi practice in India. Please edit it to include that content again, as I can't without violating 3RR. Thanks. +An open letter from the Wikipedia Review This is a message to Jenny, What the fuck do you think this is, some place where you can just waltz in unannounced and be received with arms wide open? WELL FUCK THAT! This is motherfucking Wikipedia, bitch. WE call the shots. WE ALWAYS get shotgun. WE don't give a fuck who you are, because WE are infinitely more important than you. WE are always first in line. WE always fuck the hot chick before she gets acne and settles for you. WE rob banks, charities, and ANYONE else who fucking pisses us off. This place is more than just a place, faggot, it is an IDEOLOGY. And this ideology says you need to GET THE FUCK OUT. No one here will ever like you. WE have already established cliques, slop-worthy-hoes, and prop-worthy-bros, GOT IT? WE are the ideology of elitism, exploitation, and lulz. This isn't a fucking game, kid, so don't try to tag along. You're talking to people who have been around the block AND THEN SOME. WE pioneered class. WE made 'cool' cool. And you? What have you done? Jerked off in the shower? WE INVENTED JERKING OFF IN THE SHOWER, you stupid bitch. There is a clear-cut, defined, infinitely thick WALL between you and us. WE built the wall that keeps you fags OUT. So don't try to act like you know what the fuck is going on, because you don't. You just do NOT. But you really think you can compete with the Review? LOL WOW Don't make me start flaming you. Are you forgetting who we are? WE are the ones who film people like you getting fucking destroyed by us. WE will rip your ASSHOLE out of your fucking rectum, STITCH IT on top of your pitiful dick hole, and then fuck you in the VAGINA we just made for you. SO WE MAKE YOU INTO A BITCH. Do you get it now? This site isn't a game, it isn't a place to 'chill' with your fags, and it isn't some fucking haven where people like you can get acceptance from people like US. IT ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN. JUST GTFO +Okay thanks. Please review my recent edit. I have added some examples which I think will be helpful. +20 июль a little more information -> why? to the same half of the other changes as a result of admin leave. Although I do not want to challenge the topic ban. But I think you obvious censorship. U.S. word but it's true Russian video and technical writing is a lie, just a lie and point a big fat point. 89.105.158.243 14:15, 27 July +Considering sayings. Considering 31.109.31.229 sayings. Disregarding saying for being reported and investigated for abusive behavior at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Widefox_Abusive_editor_with_banning_power. Considering the references previously presented and WP:EXT guidelines. I consider the inclusion of Serva as an external reference (as it was included for more than one year until recently removed by ) is at this point more than justified and cannot be consider under any circumstance disruptive, spam, war editing, etc etc etc as user pretends to stigmatize all my editings. 213.37.84.214 +Please note - after creating this I was made aware of a similar page here: Talk:Obama/Article_probation. I'll work this out and likely redirect this page to that one shortly. Please bear with me for the moment and sorry for any confusion. +"Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Out of curiosity, where did you find out about the poll at Talk:Pashtun people? Thanks. — " +" LOL. I do notice that I get in more trouble when I am drinking and editing since I spout more spite after a handful of High Lifes.I I just wished the ""cancer"" line would have been an intentional attack on my end since the interpretation of it is exactly how I feel even though I would have used other words. I did call his editing ""toxic"" in a previous comment so maybe I do deserve some reprimand if we are going retroactively. Doesn't matter anyways. Editors will continue to be problematic in the topic area but Nableezy gone is a net gain. ""L'chaim""? I say ""skål"" with a headbutt, my good sir! " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kevin Youkilis. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +=) If you need any help finding your way around, I am on A LOT and actually get bored waiting for things to happen! +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ariel♥Gold " +I'm assuming that Greenberg's classification scheme has a significant historical impact. +Image:Lcp_cv_adobe.pdf listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lcp_cv_adobe.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. talk +i hate your guts i hope you feel good about that +I, too, am saddened by this outcome. I have to say that it is times like this that make me ashamed to be a devout liberal. Sometimes I wonder if what you and the others say is true, that we've become so intolerant of dissenting viewpoints? I still stand by my words, someone has to clean up the riff-raff that are WP:OWNing some of our intelligent design articles. The level of abuse by those I would normally side with is completely out of control. Oh well, here's hoping for better days ahead. +" Okay, I admit that was uncalled for. I just needed a noun to go with the adjective, and it was the first one I thought of. I was pissed off and tired at the time, and the construction ""Nazi scum"" is common enough that it sounded right and got past my brain. '''''' " +Agnostics Category? Is she agnostics? I thought she went to cathorlic schools, +" OK, Stanislao (really? Stanislao? Isn't this English Wikipedia?) here is the ""discussion"" about what should be done with this page: LEAVE IT! Regardless of your political persuasion and whether the linkage of Obama's campaign to Socialism is inconvenient to you, the following facts are undisputable: 1) Obama selected ""FORWARD"" as his campaign slogan 2) ""FORWARD"" has been historically used by Socialist and Communist publications on numerous occasions" +Dan's not into Wrestling anymore I just thought maybe you guys would like to know that...I'm new, so I don't know how to edit and such, so yeah. I'll figure it out, bit by bit, and then I could help you guys with this article (I'm obsessed with Daniel Radcliffe) +, 1 March 2007 (UTC) I know I was sure I had seen a film novel cat. too - I know there is one for plays but every time I try to word it in the category in different ways it stays red linked. Thanks. 14:05 +Mission: Earth, Voyage to the Home Planet +"::::Censorship isn't an answer. Some things should be blocked, but this is like a range block to stop a few bad editors. In the process you lose others who may be good contributors. I don't think i'm making good arguments just yet in the day... 20 (email) " +Ashe No problem, I'm not too familiar with the Australian government. - +" It's not shared. We refer to ourselves as ""we"" because we are his overall, general staff. Thank you for your concern. " +What a shock A wikipedia admin who happens to be a petty little nazi asshole. How is that IP banning working out for you? +friend, i want him to have his own wikipedia page, he is very well known throughout our town +Suggestion for content to be incorporated into article It was suggested (via OTRS) that the fact that Tone has won the Prix Ars Electronica Golden Nika Prize in 2002 should be incorporated into the article. I'm posting this here as a suggestion for those who are more knowledgeable on the subject matter, to determine whether such a fact merits inclusion, and if it does, how to incorporate it. Thanks in advance. +" Fair use rationale for Image:Stone Temple Pilots.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stone Temple Pilots.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —♦♦ (Я) " +Reflection of the radar beam on buidings. I will define in the texte, thanks for mentionning. +" A barnstar for you The Modest Barnstar You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.7.126 " +" Shelby CV525 Stop saying it's invalid. It is valid, I got a reference to prove it. It does however require you to log in as a Yahoo! staff member to view the article. I'm a Yahoo! staff member and I logged in to Motor Trend and saw the article. One of my friends, named Anonymous, posted this question. Motor Trend and all the other magazines hidden all the articles regarding the CV525 so that people that aren't part of the Yahoo! Staff don't see it. This is to prevent trolls from stealing data from the articles and sending all those junky emails to us at y_answrs_team@yahoo.com. 98.207.236.113 Don't feed the trolls. Stay off my page. Who are you calling, a ""troll""? ;) 98.207.236.113 " +DRV I won't insult you by leaving the template, but please see Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Same_sex_marriage_userboxes. Thank you. +Yes, yes, and I agree. +, and put TVRage back as a creditable source for an episode guide +Real funny words there Etaonsh. Only confirms what I have already said about you! +" One problem. The land belongs to Syria and not ""his people"" (Lebanonese? Hezbollah activists? militant groups?) " +" Actually the best place to take spam issues is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam since the volunteers there have special software tools to track and reverse future link additions. Thanks for helping us with our spam problems! (talk) " +Does anybody know the exact birth date? +Yes this is what confussed me, I am searching for a english version now and I am going to put the link up on here. +What do you mean vandalism? I just gave her a warning, that's all. +Color quantization Hi all. I wrote the Color quantization article, which seems to have some overlap with this one (I just found this article). I'm not sure whether to remove the material in this article on color quantization and add a link, or to merge them into a single article. What do you think? +" Per WP:CANVASS: ""In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. However, canvassing which is done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way is considered inappropriate."" When you post to other editor's talk pages, ""Hey, another user and I are trying to open a DRN so we can remove or fix the topic sentence of that page."" that's soliciting them to come in to influence the outcome of a discussion. It's vote-stacking as defined later in the CANVASS policy. You may appeal my actions to the DRN community, if you like, by making a request at the DRN talk page, if you like, but I will not reopen the request. — (TALK) " +FAR comment Hello Lewismaster. I don't know if you are familiar with the FAR process, but can you check the Paul Kane and Opera (web browser) nominations and eventually cast your comment/vote there? These have been listed for FA removal quite some time, but the action is currently on hold because the lack of reviewers. Thanks in advance. +For one thing, the page is at Miriam not at Miriam (biblical figure) or some other disambiguated title, so unless there is some other that could contend for being the primary topic the question of which Miriam is the primary topic has already been decided. In the case of Alf no case has been made for Alf and Alfhild as the primary topic. Simply because something is the oldest known example does not mean it is the most well-known, which is the main criteria for primary topic status. Alf is an ambiguous term and I don't see that any of the Alf listed on what is currently at Alf (disambiguation) qualify and significantly more notable than any of the others. ≠ wiser +Like the Greens do, something on their site with the image and stating it is released under the creative commons license would be good. +" Seems a bit ironic to list the ""standard"" accesskeys when Wikipedia doesn't follow the standard. " +" DUDE GET A LIFE, THERE IS MORE TO LIFE THAN A STUPID COMPUTER AND ""WIKIPEDIA"" *cough*Encylopedia of all things boring""" +Needs attention I agree, this is a huge subject that isn't well treated here. I removed an unreferenced tag - there is a reference - but added an expert attention tag. - - killing the human spirit since 2003! +":: I never heard about PDPA passing a law to ban beards, women from wearing burqas, or people going to mosques. This is original research and not allowed in Wikipedia. The source you have provided in this regard only states: ""The Mujahideen were defending their country against an atheistic ideology, an oppressive government and a foreign invader."" " +Deleted article for creation - Chisenhale Gallery Dear Joe, Please could you explain why you deleted the Article for Creation: Chisenhale Gallery? You cite the reason that it contains copyrighted material but I'm afraid I don't understand what you are referring to here. I am new to Wikipedia and at the moment am entirely mystified. If you could explain in the simplest possible terms I would be extremely grateful. How do I move forward to get this article accepted? Many thanks. +KNM-ER 1802 At the end of the 2012 fossil find section there is a mention to KNM-ER 1802, but there is no explanation in the article about that fossil. +DECEMBER 3rd, 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +Whatsup Amortias, One question if you not an admin, where does your power in wiki come from. But mainly, um for the first one about kogarah, i saw it is superficial content being displayed. Second one I did because well my brother goes to Newington College and thirdly that like Brisbane wasnt actually supposed to go up. Can you remove it. Thx Nathan +there was a slight problem in the Simon section, you have detailed that it was a hang-glider when it was a regular glider oliver 2011 +Sorry Hey beeble. I know I've been giving you a lot of trouble lately. Because of this I would like to apologise. So, could you enlighten me about your life and adventures? A random user told me that you are a skydiving instructor!!?!?!? Hope you read my vandalism message. To eternity and beyond !!!!!! +", 29 June 2014 (UTC) I would suggest collecting various news articles and analysing what most of these references are calling it. I actually wanted to go with the ""Model Town tragedy"" only after I had written most of the article. Arun Zaheeruddin 14:14" +" Copyright problem removed One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ascidian | talk-to-me " +|listas = Hughes, Carol +Oh, and you might want to check out this edit, this revert and this revert. (''talk) +Newspaper Headline Was the newspaper headline blank on the Adult Swim airing of the episode? I only saw whitespace on the March 24, 2:00 AM airing. 71.172.37.93 +!!!!!! WARNING !!!!!! You are a douche. You do not even qualify as a douche bag, you are merely a douche. mwalla +Ive heard you like to rozz dead pigs is this rumour true? +" Ironic: Think about it Who you calling ""troll."" P " +Incorrect Birth Year The given source that Rae was born in 1967 is clearly incorrect. Check out the following link - does this man look 42 to you? http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/content/Image/06-25-2008/Derek-Rae.jpg Rae is obviously at least 50. Until a verifiable source is provided, no birth year should be listed. +So you are part of JarlaxleArtemis tag team editor team as well? You should rename Wikipedia to JarlaxleArtemispedia, you have clearly put him in charge. Anyone JarlaxleArtemis targets has their edits reverted, and anyone who mentions the JarlaxleArtemis editor tag team doing the reverts is blocked. +" Please do not add unsourced negative or controversial biographical material to pages, as you did with this edit to Buckhannon-Upshur High School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — " +I LOVE THONGS I LOVE THONGS +Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +" Concur; ""read cycles"" and ""write cycles"" should be separated; writing wears out the memory drastically faster than reading. Does anyone have any information on Data Retention? Best I've been able to find this morning suggests between 10 to 20 years..." +Im still here Vandalizing away, the only permenant blockage is in my bowels. I read your user page about your biases, what a nice line of shit... +" Speedy deletion Hi, I notice you R3ed that page, but I would have thought that it was not eligible since it was created in 2005? ''' t / c''' " +Thanks for your response. By that logic, everyting remotely close to history/politics is territorial. Emi/immigration, all kinds of conflicts (we humans are territorial, right?), agriculture, tourism, real estate... Seriuosly, we should not engage in WP:NOR. ← ну? +You got it now? No more reverts? LOL 109.127.86.56 +? Yeah do you spit or swallow? +I Will Be Out of Commission for a few days Starting Monday 2/2 My army of minions (I am a mad scientist remember) is just about complete and we are going to practice taking over a small country. No, not really, I wish actually that would be a lot more fun than what I'm really going to do which is have surgery on my spine and neck. +It has to be 'bureaucratic'. Otherwise we'd have every Viagra seller from the internet here. I don't know about over there, but here in the UK you can have a private consultation with the dispenser at every pharmacy I know - even ones like instore at Tesco's. The company is not notable in Wikipedia terms because there is no evidence of independent coverage. In reliable sources. We can't just take your word. Anyway, if you do decide to make a new article, let me know here - I've got this page on watch. There's no great problem about you changing name so long as you don't re-create this article. +" we know you oppose the change, you created the list. and keep removing when other users try to add the character names like every other list of acting nominations on Wikipedia. it's an important and missing part of the article and why someone would be looking at the page in the first place, that comes first instead of ""sortability?"" " +" ""Oppose"" Oppose - The first proposition includes both viewpoints in a proportional manner, and this proposal seems to be a bit vague, and moves a bit too far in the other direction. While the WP:NPOV policy does not require including all points of view, it does require proportional representation of multiple points of view, as evidenced by the sources. The current consensus is biased, as is this proposal. We should, within reason, be inclusive and representative of the sources. —Josh3580talk/hist @Josh3580 of course you are going to oppose it because you are biased. Despite the fact that I have also provided you with evidence. Not to mention the fact that (more) people on the Kurdish talk page agree more with removing the incorrect term of ""Iranian."" So I don't know why I see no changes? Oh way that is right because you are a biased person who is being told what to do by someone else. That is the only reasonable explanation I can find for your decisions because I cant think of anyone who would deny factual evidence over and over again if he is not being paid by someone else to do so" +First I will suck your ass!!!!!!!!!1 +[User talk:JesseRafe|talk]], How dare you call me racist! Look at yourself, you pathetic human being. Now stop messaging me! My reading comprehension is just fine, but you clearly have your head high and mightily up your behind! Now stop harassing me you troll! Are you that sad you've got to keep harassing me!. P.S. If my edits were that bad, go and revert them back to your supposedly wonderful version that existed before. Are you really that delusional? 18:31, July 31, 2015 (GMT). +Thats not right you uploaded this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LIVINGit_logo.png you can see that from the edit history. Also don't you think it seams odd that there is that much differences in the file names because I do, maybe all new files names should be worded in a certain way then. When requesting renames I went with the format I had seen the most out of all the article I looked at. Also can you go into a bit further detail as too what use you think the former logos serve to the articles. I am trying to get how these can be used under fair use but at the minute I can't see it plus I am sure after a while most people would be aware of new branding thats why I suggested removing them a month of so after rebranding. ( ) +I am currently considering working on the following articles: Microbial Genetics Stub This is the stub that I added to with my first edit. I find this topic very interesting and think that it has made an immense contribution to the field of genetics. The study of genetic pathways in bacteria for example has led to the process of DNA cloning that is used in laboratories worldwide. Viruses are also considered to be part of this category although some scientists argue they are not alive, they have also made contributions to molecular laboratory techniques (ex. using retroviruses to insert target DNA into a host cell genome). Selaginella I learned in second year genetics from David Smith that these plants have very interesting Post transcriptional RNA editing, where many of the cytosine nucleotides are changed to uracil nucleotides, resulting in an RNA transcript that looks quite different from its template DNA. I found this very interesting and would like to learn more about this topic and use that knowledge to expand the wiki page of Selaginella. Ectopic Expression Ectopic expression is the expression of a gene where it is not normally expressed. This is another stub on Wikipedia, and though this not a topic I am familiar about, I would like to learn more about it, its mechanisms, its applications and how it is expressed in human disease. +"Hello. I noticed your comments at Talk:WCDB. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia has a strong community policy of civility and against personal attacks on other editors. Your comment about 's grammar usage could be considered by some to be uncivil, and close to the line, if not over, of a personal attack. In the future, please refrain from commenting on other editor's English usage, most especially in reference to their talk page comments. English may not be their native language, or their thought process may have changed in the middle of constructing the sentence, etc. If you need to comment on the grammar of an article, you can do so without referencing any particular editor: ""That sentence was poorly worded, and I rephrased it,"" etc. Thank you! " +No point. I'm converted. He was a vile fascist. What is your objection? +" Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. David Goldberg. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  ►  " +", 26 August 2009 (UTC) The ""rest of the Western world"" would agree that tests questions and answers ought to be leaked? Really? This entire argument is about only one specific type of information: test answers and questions. Notrhing else. To mislabel your posting of cheat sheets of test questions and answers as ""scientific discourse"" is as misleading as it is grandiose. Posting these cheat shets as you are doing is not furthering ""scientific discourse"". On the contrary, by rendering a test that is used in scientific studies less useful, which is what you do when you leak its questions and answers on wikiepedia, you are hampering scientific discourse. 01:29" +What? Do you need a Diper? +" Why jump the gun so quickly? That is one of the problems with Wikipedia. Why not wait until Jan 20 to add it? What is the point in adding it so early? Talk " +" If it said ""casting director"" I would not have done anything. It stated blatant falsehoods and I removed them. I am glad you now understand she was not a ""creator"", which is a huge difference from casting director. If you change to casting director, my beef is over. Claiming creator and director are big representations." +" Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. " +" ""material copied from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed without the permission of the copyright holder is likely to be a copyright violation." +(i.e. =a semi-detached house, in UK parlance) +I haven't encountered any issues with the site....109.150.60.235 +" I have read WP:BLPN, perhaps you have not? The WP:BLPN thread notes too much use of ""allegations of this and allegations of that..."" in the Mel Gibson article. '''''' " +" Keith Lynch Should he be on the list? Top credit it would seem is working on the Witness series for Al Jazeera English. I can't find a site that ties him to the programme, but one special was nominated for an International Emmy. However, he certainly wasn't the producer of that one, at least according to (what appears to me to be) their website here. He may well have been producer of episodes that weren't that one (they cover a lot of topics), but I can't find a source. Searching for ""Keith Lynch"" on that website yields nothing. I'm just not seeing exception here - we've listed 35ish people from thousands. I've found this which confirms that he's with the for-mentioned station, though. Any more evidence or TV credits? -  [ humourous – discuss ] " +Well, true. Although, when you invest time writing a comprehensive article with many new reliable references presenting new findings by historians on a subject, and get faced with a hasty deletion request within 10 minutes from putting the page up, what can you do but defend yourself. +" I know no such thing. It's possible that your computer was displaying a cached version of the page, in which case you would have seen a prior version. However, the edit history shows the sequence of events clearly. The fact is that you jumped to the assumption that I was operating in bad faith, which is something that your history shows you do all too often. What I was asking you to redact was not the ""if that can be sourced properly"" bit — that was a simple error. What I objected to was your statement, ""I see you are now joining in the Bad Faith discussion that Richard Arthur Norton is perpetrating, in which you reply to or redact commentaries in a way that deliberately makes mine look as though I am ignoring what you say. Deplorable behavior."" I have done no such thing, and the evidence shows it. Please strike through that passage. — (talk • contribs) " +" Ti malakas. Three authors wrote the book in various stages, which actually is two books in one (European and Pacific theaters of war). You have to ask them who wrote the passage. The exact text is not with me, but this book is available in any decent sized English library. But wait: you are in Greece, no? So you lack a decent sized library of any sort: the national library in downtown Athens is in shambles and a joke. You seem to use the exclamation point a lot! Are you excitable?! Perhaps that explains why you refuse to be objective! Now think logically for once in your life: if Greece had ""rolled over"" and agreed to be occupied by Hitler, do you think Hitler would have invaded anyway? Hitler was mad (crazy), but not that mad. Anyway, I see from the timeliness of your reply that you ""live here"" 24/7 (oli mera) and so nothing will go past your censorous eye, which is like the Cyclops and escapes nothing. So I will merely insult you here and leave it at that! Goodbye patrioti! (Ti vlakas). " +As politely as I can, I am asking that you see the Nancy Reagan Discussion page for your response to my requested editorial changes. 74.73.106.239 +current registration is 42.9% dem - again not 50%... http://www.azsos.gov/election/voterreg/Active_Voter_Count.pdf +edits, stop vandalising my +Please do not continue to radically alter a notable subject to a non-notable article. Your edits have been reverted. +Here is the problem, most of the sources are circular. There are no independent sources and no sources that come from any sort of scholar, researcher or journalist independent of Systema, with the exception of Aikido journal. However, in terms of historical there is no real proof of the 11th century claim. We only have the word of Systema people about that. +" Title of Article I wish to call your attention to the fact that the title of this article, ""Jewish holidays,"" is wrongly transliterated in the page's title as ""Yom Tov"" / ""Yamim Tovim,"" a misnomer, and should have rather been transliterated as ""Chagim Yehudim"" (Heb. חגים יהודיים). This is because, in classical Hebrew (or in rabbinic Hebrew), the word ""Tom Tov"" has a limited meaning, and excludes some Jewish holidays, such as Purim, Hanukkah and Yom Kippur. " +Of course, but I would hope you woudn't have done it in quite the way that you did if someone made the point the were just asking a specific question. +"Pointing out the users that delete userboxes often is not a personal attack.GorillazFan " +Wikipedia's de facto policy on personal attacks is that one may make them if one is an administrator (or administrator's pet) and goes about it snarkily. +Their not bad their blocking cuz their liberal >:-) +" Thanks; see also ""small amount of wikimarkup"". " +" Status and Advice I deleted it, both as copyvio and because it would be considered promotional in any case. A Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press releasedon't praise the organization or person, say what they do. Don't talk about the overall importance of the subjector use adjectives of praise. . Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitableas this was not. You will need to rewrite the articles to Wikipedia style; a good place to start learning it is our guide to writing Wikipedia articles . First, give the basic informationthe source should be the CV birthplace and date, degrees, previous positions. If there are published books, list them in formal bibliographic style. List the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Scopus or Web of Science or Google Scholar, or some other appropriate source. Do not include conference presentations, book chapters, and other minor published work. Such a list needs to be frequently updated, and belongs in the CV, not an encyclopedia. Include major national level offices and awards, but not minor ones and certainly not student awards. Be sure to list editorships (but not mere editorial board membership) we consider it very important, and you should add it to the articles for the relevant journals also, with a link to the bio. AQ award is worth mentioning; a nomination for an award is not. It is not necessary to cite the basic information in detail to other than the official CV. However, give references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. For any part you quote directly from a published bio, include quotation marks and a reference. Do just just say "" It has been widely covered by press outlets such as The New York Times and Forbes."" Give the reference in full, including the title of the article and a link to it. Pay particular attention to the way we make links to other Wikipedia articles. Avoid WP:Peacock terms: do not use words of praise, ofr state that the person is important: the contents of the article will show it. Don't just give a general list of all the fields he is interested in. Say briefly what his research has shown, with citations. Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective studentsthat sort of content is considered promotional. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of press releases or web sites, or CVs, which are usually more expansive. If I can help you with any of this, let me know.'''''' ( talk ) " +Its worth quoting this extract from here: A series of publications has focused on the effects of exposure to low frequency (<500 Hz) high intensity (>90 dB) noise, a range of structural lung changes having been reported mainly in rats12 but also in humans.13 These data suggest that low frequency high intensity noise may lead to structural and functional changes in the airways, pleural mesothelium, and lung parenchyma. With frequencies from commercial loud speakers typically in the range of 30 Hz to 20 kHz, it is the lower frequency band of 30–150 Hz which is usually boosted in big music venues for enhanced effect. These low frequencies could indeed be particularly damaging to the lung parenchyma if they coincide with its natural frequency of around 128 Hz.14 Furthermore, Mahagnah and Gavriely15 showed that, in normal humans, the lung acts as a low pass filter with flat transmitted energy up to 100 Hz or 300 Hz. In view of these experimental results, the most compelling observation in our four patients is that the lower frequency band, which tends to be boosted in the kind of music they listen to, corresponds with those frequencies, thereby ensuring maximal acoustic energy transfer to the lungs. +I don't fucking understand. +" I saw it was a sequel. Given that the sequel article was so minimal and the initial book in the series had a reasonably good article that went into depth on more than just the one book, I figured that a redirect was in order (especially given that AFD is not for merges). Just a case of being BOLD — I figured I'd redirect and see if the consensus is with me. I appreciate you agreeing that I was right about where the consensus would fal! ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ " +A section on games that can beatable if you have an edge like hole carding is a good idea. Then we can get rid of the normally non-beatable games that some editors have insisted are beatable theoretically. It could be a good idea before adding such a section to put it first on this talk page. +Hi Isotope23! Pretty immature of Griot to make fun of my surname like that, but anyway I'd just like to point out that even his friend was able to see it all clearly... Chris Daly, gun control, user talk page stuff, etc. I was a little surprised by the message above with the YouTube video as well, but it looks like it has been expanded and explained. I just take it at face value, that is, a statement that there are gun enthusiasts in SF as well as elsewhere, which does not strike me as particularly controversial. As for the article, I'd agree with BillyTFried that Chris Daly has been associated with pro-gun-control factions and legislation for quite a while, and don't see why that should not be mentioned in the article, along with his various other positions on issues and advocacy. It seems factual and neutral to me. Cheers, Cheer! +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page About a Boy, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:LuK3my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (Talk) " +"==AWARD OF THE PURPLE HEAD TO FISHERQUEEN QNT== We of Wikipedia suck up admin staff felt that for your courageous and forthright censorship of truthseekers was exemplary and deserved reconition on the time honoured traditions of facist dictators and mass murderers by giving you a badge award. This Badge you see above the ""Purple Head"" can be worn on the front of your forehead. Without your speedy and diligent banning of users like Truthseekers Wiki might gain some factual and unbiased information and this is something that we at Wiki are keen to avoid. Users who can block and ban newcomers without question and then fend them off without providing good rerasons are exactly the calibre of sanshonest leaders we require and should you ever require any help with blocking hundreds of thousands of people - please feel free to call on any facist aligned admin at any time. " +This issue has been supperbly dealt with. 77.248.185.98 +Have a good eve. giano, and I agree with Risker, mostly. liqour is fine in the afternoon's here in the uncivilized west, it's one of the few actual preventions for Montezuma's Revenge. +Board Rules 1. Fallacious comments will be marked as such with an asterisk (*) at my sole discretion. Fallacious comments may include: dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid, dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter, Ignoratio Elenchi, argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad verecundiam, Circulus in Probando, Non Sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc, Plurium Interrogationum, and others. 2. Please sign all comments. +" If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was ""gibberish"". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. " +" PS As I can still ""edit"" up to the time I sign this, the anti-Masonic ""gods"" 'n' ""socks"" of Wiki must think that the ant-masonic job is being done for them, and are waiting for the UGLE PoV loyalist Mason to go off to my Lodge. That's what I doing now QED... " +":Yes, I agree. That edit definitely proved your NPOV. And I know it hurt. It hurt me to look at it. Just saying, a similar edit of mine was offered as a defense for me in an edit warring fracas from long ago. As much as it pains me to say, we must sublimate our passions at times for the good of the project ^\ '''rolls''' " +He should start with the Peters/Ahmed figures question. +" Recent edits Please remain civil and do not make personal attacks on me as you have in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Forrest, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerome Vered (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Rutter, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Pawson. Please keep discussion on-topic with the subject listed in the nomination. If you feel I am acting in bad faith, open a case rather than using a deletion discussion as a forum for voicing your own opinion about the edits and contributions I make. Sottolacqua " +" Wrong Link?? Subsection ""Children born to polygamous marriages"" includes the link [[Patrilineality|non-male]], which is in the last line of the quote. I have the sense that it should read [[Patrilineality|male]] or perhaps [[Matrilineality|non-male]]. Will someone else please take a look? ""No alleged children of Joseph Smith, Jr. born to women other than Emma Smith has ever been proven, though the question of Smith's progeny from his alleged polygamous wives has been raised since his death. Several alleged Smith descendants have been identified but highly accurate DNA tests have in 2007 eliminated four candidates though research into this history is complicated by the facts that Y-DNA genetic testing for non-male lines is not possible, and two candidates died as infants.""" +Coal Chamber-Sway I was listening the somg Sway by Coal Chamber, and it had the same lyrics as Fire Water Burn. Can anyone confirm? +" Diabetes Skele, I edited the aspirin/diabetes paragraph, but only for historical reasons. Please consider that diabetes is one of the best researched diseases and that it is very improbable that an effective treatment has been fond that is not well-known to main stream medicine. I would strongly suggest to you that you follow the instructions given to you by your health care provider and do not experiment with treatments that have not been verified by the scientific community. That said, I would be curious to see what is written in the Russian article that I cited in the article, if you could get hold of it. (T) " +Wow, complaining to two administrators over a few edits is very mature! Seriously, get over it and stop obsessing over me, man. 70.127.205.86 +":::: I'm rather certain that the use of "">"" and ""<"" in historical linguistics is a well-established convention long predating any issue of computer fonts and ""ASCII substitution"". It's certainly been used in pretty much all mainstream technical literature in print for decades. ☼ " +" ""Proto-Indo-Iranian language evolved out of an earlier stage in situ"" is simply a translation of the fuzzy ""Indigenous Aryans"" into precise terms, based on straightforward meanings of ""indigenous"" and ""Aryan"". Now, you cannot simply sprinkle an article with in random places and then cry ""bad faith"" when they are removed. Such behaviour is disruptive. I am sure we are more than happy to accept citation requests for specific claims, but we're not going to spell out and reference the meaning of English words like indigenous for your convenience. I invite you once again to contribute in a constructive way, but if you are unwilling or unable to do that, we have nothing to discuss here. (𒁳) " +" Massacre or what? Mercaz HaRav massacre not enough dead Oboler and NoCal100says. Is 10 a ""large number""? I personally think not. In which case this should be renamed to ""incident"" or ""attack"" or similar. Otherwise any terrorist attacks that kill 10 or more people should likewise be listed as a ""massacre"". Wikipedia will quickly fill up with ""massacres"" diluting those that really are massacre of large numbers of people. Agree. Renaming, per the discussion here NoCal100 (talk) original here And Arutz Sheva only call it attack: Ynet attack Israeli Ministry of Foreign affairs Shooting: Jpost attack: Israel insider attack: In fact one only has to look at the references supplied in the article itself to see that attack is the most prevalent description, I'm astounded that Oboler found time to search out an obscure tiny article when the Mercaz HaRav attack was one of the reasons behind the racist group JIDF, which Oboler aids. One would have thought that the Mercaz HaRav attack would have caught Oboler's attention first? Dead link live link to same article see also Ha'aretz Seven students remain hospitalized after shooting surprisingly the only source for massacre is wiki.????????????????????????????????????" +File:Yakovlev Yak-52TW (Aerostar) Kyneton Vabre.jpg File:Yakovlev Yak-52 (Bacau) Kyneton Vabre-2.jpg File:Yakovlev Yak-18T Lethbridge Vabre.jpg File:Yakovlev Yak-52 Bundaberg Vabre.jpg File:TL Ultralight TL-2000 Sting Carbon Melton Vabre.jpg File:Victa Airtourer 100 Shepparton Vabre-1.jpg +Thanks - that's a great idea about the smaller font! I haven't really looked at WT:EL yet; I can imagine that it's an emotional issue because so often EL get abused for spam, so people's nerves may be thin there. — +" For everyone's info I don't give a flying fuck if my account gets deleted/blocked, I will changed my IP use a different email and become a troll/vandel. Jack In Grow up. | 39 " +I will hunt you down and kill you, you useless piece of shit +my god your all heartless! +Both can be brilliant, but they are very different and suited to different moods. +order of the thingys why are us and ussr first?? surely it should be china,then britain, france, ussr, U.S, then the commonwealth and the others, china were at war for the longest so why are they near the end?? +And further more I am not the main contributor here. I just wanted to add one section. Its been re-done to become neutral. Conflict of interest? Because I'm writing about something I know? I'm sure anything you write about I would hope you have some interest in it before getting sources or not. What do you specialize in Orange Mike? Do you have hobbies? This is getting a little too ridiculous now. I expect the WP:Whining to be thrown my way next.- +Wasted Time R, just what are you prattling on about now? So annoying as usual. +judging exclusively from +", 1 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks for asking. It has been decided that we wait for confirmation from ABC, cast or crew. –'''''' talk • edits 02:45" +, BILLCJ's Mom, she's a big fat, fucking bitch Big old fat fuckin' bitch, BILLCJ's Mommmmmmmmmmm Yeahhhhh, Chaaaaa +Rydberg you're welcome. i just thought something should have been said about that. +Chamar Section reverts I have added links backing up what I have wrote. Why did you revert it? +(UTC) We can't have fansites. 17:30, 19 October 2012 +" Inclusivenes Whoever changed the direct quote from the Theosophist (and many other publications) of the stated objectives of Theosophy to make it more ""inclusive"" (i.e., by removing the word Brotherhood) needs to stop. You just don't change direct quotes so they match your feelings. I have fixed this. " +You are not Nvidia, Nvidia's page explains the situation better than a vandal like you, I'll revert and ask for this page to be protected from vandals like you. +" Because the central vandal has a dynamic IP, I would have to list at least 10 users for a check (which is too much) and I have no proofs other than general observation and they require a ""proof"" on the CheckUser page. " +For what you did and wrote about me, you are a twat of the highest order: David Bret. Furthermore, if we ever meet face to face I will punch your fucking lights out. +Image:Road Train unloading.jpg This is a useful photo to show triple-stacked trailers, but I wonder if it actually shows a road train. The trailers are of different types and I wonder if they are actually all going to be joined, this might just be convenient way of delivering the yellow heavy hauler trailers to where thay are needed. Anyway, it doesn't matter, the photo would be useful for a couple of other articles such as one of heavy haulers, but I wonder if you could crop off the bottom third of the photo (the empty foreground.) Regards +Stop Deleting Images Without First Consulting Quadell, you need to stop deleting images without first consulting with the person who posted them. That is bad behavior on your part. Cease and desist. If you think there's a problem, first discuss it with the person involved. Don't take matters into your own hands and just take action. Doing that shows disrespect to others and makes people angry. LedAstray +Clifinar I think that while the idea of having a page for clifinar is ridiculous, it has been spamming the web quite well and Wikipedia should be a resource to explain why suddenly over 2000 pages exist for this useless term +I agree with the criticisms above. Why is 100 million better than 104 million? 4 million is quite a sizeable amount, and more records than other artists even hope to achieve. I believe that it has sufficiently been rounded already, and it is simply inconsistent to have one figure on the Thriller page and another here. I suggest we keep 104 million. +You are a sock puppet of a disgusting tranny freak +Since you are an anonymous IP with no edits other than the one on my talk page, I doubt you will come back to read my response. Nevertheless.. I do not fully understand the reasoning behind your complaint. You are implying that I maliciously removed links to club websites, in order to sever contact between clubs and their members. This is not the case. I removed them because they are nothing more than advertising. If we were to include links to two clubs, then it would be logical that we should link to all of them. I am simply following guidelines specified in What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is not a place to promote things, regardless of whether the thing being promoted is a charitable club, a political party or a product. Wikipedia is also not a search engine, in that people looking to join a particular lifesaving club (or find its website) would be better advised to use Google or another search engine. Therefore, I feel that my removal of the links was in keeping with the Guidelines of Wikipedia. If you or someone else feels that they should be there for one reason or another, then you have every right to put them back, and I will not go out of my way to take them out again, if you have a genuine reason why they should be included in the article. +Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Buffalo, West Virginia, you may be blocked from editing. +Hi Can I ask why you are naming people who aren't me (JohnJoe) as socks of mine? I mean, my real sock, who is a very active user here, is no way associated with any of the users associated with me. In fact, I haven't 'socked up' against you since by banning for raising legitimate objections against your conduct. Oh, and I expect this comment to be removed, dodging the question and perpetuating a fued that could have been ended months and months ago. That would be real classy, and just what I expect from a snivelling, pathetic coward like you. +Stan Kemp It's also the site's biggest shortfall. Any retard who can push a button can edit it. +Start of Article Hello, I have started this article today. I will be attempting to build up over the next couple of days and then update it as often as possible. Please do help me if you know anything or just the simple wiki, grammar or spelling stuff. +"Bold textItalic textlink title Headline text nbjgMedia:Example.oggInsert non-formatted text here #REDIRECT Insert textStrike-through textSuperscript textSmall Text Block quote{| class=""wikitable"" |- ! header 1 ! header 2 ! header 3 |- | row 1, cell 1 | row 1, cell 2 | row 1, cell 3 |- | row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 |}" +An admin has already told you that we are running on IAR. Also, when i said the same instrument, i meant the exact same instrument, not the same type of instrument. Snowflake, what do you propose we do as Gangon is still accusing me of personal attacks now, no matter how kindly and delicatly i try to give him friendly advice. +But I don't even mention scientists in my proposed version. We really don't want to give claim and counter claim to infinity. Don't you like my proposed version? *is hurt* 86.44.29.35 +" Islam in the Solomon Islands A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Islam in the Solomon Islands, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. Docg " +" Clearly people are utterly determined to ignore the comment tag that was placed at the top of this page. I therefore quote it in full: Please do not add ""the game (game)(mind game)(intangible game)(memory game) etc."", it was only recently deleted, see this page's discussion page or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Game (game) (6th nomination). The article is gone. The Game was ruled non-notable and non-verifiable, and therefore not fit for inclusion in Wikipedia. And that includes attempting to recreate it by discussion on this talk page. Get the hell over it. " +" Have re-worded article, too much ""doubt"" mentioned for Elvis and The Beatles, while Jacksons entry seemed to be an essay to convert us over to all beliving he was the number 1 artist." +" arrrrghhh god are u on drugs? since when has ""rock"" been bigger than brock? thats bullshit.ive seen the dude he's huge! so are u trying to say kurt angle is about 5 ft 6 or something? i dont think so. no one cares about his stats in his ""burger flipping days"", or his pizza boy delivering days. he's 6 ft 4 ok?" +Of course it is arbitrary, it is the very definition of the word arbitrary (Do you have a basic grasp of the English language or not?). 999Mw plant doesn't qualify but 1001Mw one does, if you don't think it is arbitrary you are an absolute moron. 169.0.73.98 +Listen yeah, don't' threaten me because you wont do nothing. Your useless and pointless and whats to stop me from doing doing it again. +Hi! I'm the evil Bubby00000. His I.P Address. I'm back baby! +" This party, like some others in Quebec, never attempted to get the English-speaking vote, which went to the Quebec Liberal Party, and therefore were always know both inside and outside Quebec as the ""Union Nationale"". So that is the name commonly used by English speakers in Canada. The same with the PQ and ADQ. The Quebec Liberal Party on the other hand which once had links to the Liberal Party of Canada is always referred to in English by English-speaking Canadians. " +Of course it does. A bill becomes an act when it is signed by the governor, unless overridden or by the governor's inaction. - +This article contains so much garbage that a single editor cannot clean it up. +216.102.15.71 i lika to doa da cha cha]]]]]] +" ONCE AGAIN: please wait until we come to an agreement here in the talk page before modifying the article. We are not in a hurry, and it is the civilized way to proceed in Wikipedia when there is a disagreement between editors. The other approach (i.e., repeatedly changing the article) is called ""edit war"" and it usually ends up with both editors being blocked... Cheers, " +According to the SFLC document, consent only needs to be obtained if the permissive license is to be retained. Re-licensing of work already covered by a permissive license can be done without consent (and is indeed done all the time; Microsoft didn't ask anybody when they appropriated the BSD TCP stack and relicensed it as part of Windows.) I'm skeptical that it even needs to be done in the cases the SFLC describes, as that sounds more like a GPL-induced requirement than one pertaining to permissive licenses, which are far less restrictive. +REDIRECT Talk:Stuart Gray (footballer, born 1973) +" Just because something hasn't attracted criticism doesn't mean it can't be improved on. YLee's edit makes the summary more focused and fluent. I do find one problem with itthe reduction of the special effects passage. This now reads in its entirety: ""Douglas Trumbull and his effects team were given carte blanche to meet the December 1979 release date."" Though not inaccurate as a discrete fact, this rather misrepresents the history of the film's special effects work. While some reference to the previous work should be restored, I'd also argue for recasting the sentence to eliminate ""the December 1979 release date."" The beginning of the very next paragraph states that the film was ""[r]eleased in North America on December 7, 1979."" This sort of close repetition should be avoided, especially in the lead summary. The one other point I could see as significant enough to restoresomewhat abbreviatedis this: ""The film came together only days before the premiere; Wise always felt that the theatrical version was a rough cut of the film he wanted to make."" (As a minor point, ""tightened and new scenes"" is a bit awkward; in this case, the previous phrasing""tightened and added scenes""is better and still works grammatically in the sentence's new structure.) " +How many times do you need to be told? STOP removing the information on Kyle Webster on the page Rugeley. +(edits by User:TimothyHorrigan) +Sorry forgot to sign it +your wrong stupid Go check the net worth of carlos slim and you will see that i'm correct and leave me the fuck alone i do what i want bitch. +" Yes, Apteva ... I do wish you yourself would learn to be civil and collegial. Your snide, sarcastic and snippy comments - plus the badgering of anyone who dares speak against you - show that civil and collegial are either not in your personal dictionary, or that you have long forgotten their meaning (✉→←✎) " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to New Hampshire. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +I didn't edit a warning kiddo, i made a new entry, stop acting all high and mighty +Image:Tom_Paulin.jpeg I have tagged Image:Tom_Paulin.jpeg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. tast +Parker v District of Columbia Thank you for demonstrating that a complete lack of expertise is no impediment to editing an entry in Wikipedia, thus rendering Wikipedia a sandbox for folks with time on their hands, not a reference work. Putz. Eble23:25, April 23, 2007. +" I am looking into it and will discuss with the blocking admin, this may take a while so your patience is appreciated. tc " +Oh ok. Thx alot Malik I appreciate it. ) +" I meant ""premature"" in the sense of ""before the onset of old age"". 44 is middle-aged, so he wasn't really old. But I have no objection to the removal of the word; it was redundant, after all. 20:39 Mar 2, 2003 (UTC)" +":::Damn you, Hugh! Circles are a pain in the ass to draw in GIMP/Photoshop - but for you ... How do you suggest - a ""blow out"" zoomin in (otherwise IoM and CI area always going to be hard to see.) A circle is tough too because it is going to cut into northern Frace to take in the CI. pléigh " +Walkerboy, please cite evidence or leave tag. +No, you are the one making tendentious POV edits, clearly demonstrated by politically motivated edits to remove the mention of the well sourced NSDAP membership (the German Wikipedia simply states that that politician was a member) in the biography of one politician, while apparently being aware of the fact that it is included in a biography on a politician from a different party. Making sure we apply the same, consistent standards in two comparable cases, and initiation a discussion on a consistent policy, is not a point maneuvre in any way. +" AP style is ""Myanmar"", so that's no mystery. When American see the name in the news, the wonder, ""Where is this country Myanmar?"" So they Google it up. " +Here's yet another source that names terror groups responsible. About your attacking the used sources and me, I have known for a long time you have a difficulties with assuming good faith, and you have been asked to tone down your comments at this very page. I am not interested in continuing this discussion with you. The article was nominated on deletion and kept 15 to 1 (2 with the nominator counted). If you have a problem with me using particular sources, you're welcome to take me to ae and try to make me topic banned. Otherwise I am done with you here. +Most isolated mountain peaks of the United States‎]] [[ +Loss of Right Arm I seem to remember reading (in Strange But True Baseball Stories, by Furman Bisher, that Gray had lost his right arm trying to hop a freight. +Really? Nobody else thinks I'm funny? +The gazebo is right next to the statue. It was built at the same time. Yet the news issue is that it's not known how the gazebo is paid for. Misappropriation of money is a major issue in Vaughan, and warrants inclusion. +Oh yeah, and this is not a new account, I am simpily with my accomplice and we happen to share very identical ideologys. Please don't make presumptions, fore its not an acedemically desired idiosyncrasie. +Talk for unprotection, ect. Well, not much vandalism going on compared to others, one month protection...! A bit excessive? Heh. anyway I thought I just bring up a few pointers. Here is one external link which is 3rd party citation. obsessedwithwrestling.com Profile. I am sure if you ask nicely on the WP:PW talk page, someone might help add citation. +I saw your edit, the following line that is 00:17, 6 October 2015 C.Fred (talk | contribs) deleted page Signa Vianen (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject) I urge you to delete the reference stating that the Article was about a real person, which not etc. etc. Are you implying that I lack importance or even significance, because a Wiki page did not utterly describe me. I did not publish the page about myself, and when I saw it years ago, I left it at that. I only checked if the facts were OK and over the years somebody sometimes helped me to make a few changes. But I never bothered about it so much as to expand it by adding all kinds of sources. no need. My relevance is not to be measured by how many articles I published in your country, because I was never a journalist in your country. In fact, you wouldn´t even be able to understand anything I wrote because I am not even English speaking. You are clearly going by double standards here. When a Wiki editor uses words like crap whenever editing pages about living people, credible people with a solid track record, that in itself is UNACCEPTABLE. And I was not the only one complaining about ´´him´´. Also, please be aware of the FACT that there are a number of pages, people with my similar background, cultural background that is, who have even less data. And there is nothing wrong with that, because among ourselves we know our importance. Nobody from out of nowhere will come in and refer to it as CRAP. I was attacked by a stalker yesterday and I called it to Wiki´s attention because it was one crazy addition to the page. The stalker even changed my nationality, changing me into a Caribbean national which I am most definitely not. I guess that kind of gibberish will prompt the creeps to come out and complete the feast. I have come to the conclusion btw that wiki editors are not necessarily the most credible folks, since they always hide themselves behind a fake ID. Eraser of Stalker Edits +All done now, and it seems really detailed. If there is too much detail then it may be trimmed a bit, but all the necessary info is there. +I suspect the decision (?Martin's) to allow taxon details to be omitted and then picked up from the page name, although apparently helpful to users, may actually be a mistake, in terms of the complexity of coding which results. Looking at the code, doesn't allow this (although the genus and species could be found from the page title) ��� however the documentation currently doesn't explain this difference. +" April 2006 (UTC) If the information is on the same topic, I welcome shortening and summarising it. It makes the page more precise and more tidy. It also means the language is more formal - e 15:25, 27" +I did the job by hand. I hope it won´t be deleted. Any suggestions? +ok ... too late. will i stay under autoblock? +The Weir is a play written by Conor McPherson in 1997. It was first produced at The Royal Court Theatre Upstairs in London, England, on 4 July 1997. It first appeared on Broadway at the Walter Kerr Theatre on 1 April 1999. It has since been performed in Toronto, Dublin, Belfast, Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Los Angeles, Chicago, Buffalo, Washington, D.C. and San Jose.[1] +Hi, please read WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files. Thanks, 1 +" (UTC) And what would you say otherwise? He hates ""gays""? He is anti-gay in the same way that southern whites were anti-black in 1900... it's really pretty simple... He is probably one of the most bigoted people currently in politics. Actually, the first thing that ought to be done to unbias the article and make it encyclopaedic is to have the name of the article reflecting his formal name. This should be not a campaign advertisement which it currently is. That goes for any politician that is listed in an encyclopaedia by their ""buddy name"". Jim is his ""election name"", I take it? Is it the name his handlers have given him to personalize him? It was what they do in the state of New York... 05:47, 5 April 2014" +" mention the photo credit for tornmal Already done, see , Thanks ''' Talk " +I Can't thank you enough...The flower is beautiful. The page is dull that way, but the flower brightens it. I hope you lead a great life ahead, good people like you deserve it. You're a very nice person. Nobody I know has ever been so concerned and kind. Please accept the barnstar as a token of appreciation. I know this isn't the time to go and award barnstars but you need it. Thanks once again also for the hopeful messages. I feel much better than before. As for the deceased persons list thing, I couldn't possibly add anything, i'd just be writing a book about her as a friend and a person not as a wikipedian. Since she knew +You're a fucking idiot, aren't you? +It would be polite to, yes. (talk|email) +" Kvens are indigenous to today's Northern Norway Thank you kindly, user ! The user may not understand that the Kvens are indigenous to Northern Norway, in my view anyway, and many of the best experts seem to agree. We are not moved by the personal assumptions and/or believes of the user , but science instead, of course, as you seem to agree. The user Please read the related writings from this column's archive. The Norse are not indigenous to the extreme Northern Norway of today. The Kvens are. The Northern Norway's Tromsa area alone has at least 12 prehistoric Kven place names. Historians and linguistics experts have been able to come to this conclusion, for instance based on the words and spellings that were used prior to the time - and/or during the time - when the first Norwegian/Norse immigration to Iceland took place. The relevant sources have been given in this forum, for instance KVENLAND / KAINUUNMAA, 1986, by the Professor Emeritus Kyösti Julku. Where are your sources for counter claims, user ? Do we only have your personal narrow view point, which even appears to be based on no sources at all. If there are sources behind your views, what are they in relation to this matter for instance ? The related and quoted experts - earlier mentioned in this forum - are not basing their views only on the writings of Ottar, or Alfred the Great, or Tacitus, or any other before mentioned or not mentioned historian, or other scientist, writer or leader alone, of course. Ask yourself for instance, who might be behind the prehistoric jewelry hidings that have been discovered only recently from Inari, not that far from the coastline of the Arctic Ocean. Examine and read more. Only after having done that, make your own conclusions, not before, please. In the meanwhile, let the experts make their conclusions, based on all the material and sources they have available. Wikipedia is here to reveal the findings of science, not the opinions of yours. It is generally accepted that the Sami people are the indiegenous poeple of Northern Norway. I am aware of the history of this article. If you read the article you will notice footnotes such as this: A reference. These are the references for the paragraph you are reeading. When you click on one you will get the reference list. A link is provided for most articles. I suggest you read the article being referenced, and either start discussing my interepretation of the refered article, or the content of the refered article. For the later you need to provide your own references. User Labongo: Your view is not a ""generally accepted"" view at all, but only your view. We hope you agree, that it is not reasonable to request for us to have to provide evidence to everyone separately. Please check the archive for the beginners. There is a reason why we are asking for the exact quotes and exact - easily verifiable (as Mr. Mikkalai put it) - book and page information from you. The reason is, that simply showing a list of authors and books proves nothing. Wikipedia's vandals and foul players are known to resort to exactly this sort of tactics. Once again: The sources offered do not agree with the text written in the Kven article ! To understand this, you only have to read the last comments by the user Drieakko''. As everyone can see, he continues backing up from his statements. In different ways, he goes on appologizing, while he attempts to round of his false statements. What does that prove: This is only a learning processs to him. He really doesn't have anything to contribute to this topic, except for chaos ! User Labongo/Drieakko: It is your job to show where exactly someone - a respected and known historian or other scientist - agrees with your text. The burden of proof is in your hands to show evidence. Please, include exact quote(s) and page information. That is how Mr. Mikkalai wanted to proceed, after a recent concensus was reached. We are quite familiar with the related material in question. We have provided our sources in detail, you have not, not even a single quote with a matching book and page information. - - Steve Wondering Please stop pretending that this article has no references. Show, what reference matches the current text - show even a single such source to begin with. What +" Why was the below article redirected to ET? I thought it was setup for a vote and nothing was finalised? Extra Terrestrial Biological Entity EBE is an abbreviation for the term Extra Terrestrial Biological Entity. In the 1940's several alien spacecraft were allegedly recovered by the U.S. and other countries, along with a few dead aliens and one live one. These beings were referred to as EBEs (a name suggested by Dr. Vannevar Bush). The term was first made reference to in 1986 when Jenny Randles interviewed a military soldier named ""Robert"" about some stolen Top Secret US Military papers. The term was first made public in 1987 with the release of the Majestic 12 documents by Timothy Good (a)(b): ""Dr. Detlev Wulf Bronk's team has suggested the term ""Extra Terrestrial Biological Entities"" (EBEs), be adopted as the standard term of reference for these creatures until such time as a more definitive designation can be agreed upon."" (b) In a letter to researcher William Steinman, Dr. Robert I. Sarbacher who was with the Washington Institute of Technology, confirms that some of the scientists involved in the study of recovered flying discs from Roswell were Dr. Vannever Bush, John von Neumann, and Dr. Robert Oppenheimer. (c) Steinman also discovered that one of the scientists working on saucer technology from the early days was Dr. Eric Henry Wang who became Director of the Department of Special Studies, within the Structures Division, of the old Wright Air Development Center, near Dayton, Ohio. This term has been often used in the TV series X-files. References (a) - Above Top Secret (1987) by Timothy Good. (b) - Cosmic Crashes (1999) by Nick Redfern. (c) - UFO Crash at Aztec (1986) by William S. Steinman and Wendelle C. Stevens. See Also Majestic 12 Rendlesham Forest Incident List of major UFO movies/tv shows Category:Astrobiology * Category:UFO " +" Newsletter Thanks Indon. I tried to hide it until the delivery day, hehehhe. Have you seen it before? If not, then I have done a somewhat good job of hiding it P. Cheers eng " +TOCright: template for putting the table of contents on the right margin Created by: User:GraemeMcRae +Supdiop If all of you support him so much after what he did, then i will also behave like him. Maybe i will also get sympathizers on my talk page. Don't pretend that he is something better than CosmicEmperor. +That would be wrong, because A2 will end in Constanta bypass which will be a separate motorway. The A2-A4 interchange is planned at the 13th kilometer of the bypass. You can consult this forum for additional information - http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1081947. +Stop this ochlarchical nonscence!!!! What you are doing is ochlarchical and not anarchistic or matter of fact. Stop it now. This only futher proves your obvious mental deficiencies. +ISIS Prisoners Are there any ISIS prispners taken or are they all killed in combat oder executed as once? 84.62.108.128 +TO: Dpr I created a new article to stop the nonsense. Here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admin_duncharris%27s_abusive_messages._Wiki%27s_atheist_bullyboy kdbuffalo +" List of Buick models or at leas link to such an article? I can't find a list of Buick models or even a link to an article along the lines of ""Buick car models"". Shouldn't there perhaps be one in this article? Or is there one, but I simply missed it? - " +Why thank you BW. Don't worry though, I've seen enough abuse on my accusers user pages to release that slandering people with a different point of view is their modus operandi. I shall continue to press my view that the death/injured count must be included on the PIRA - regardless of the personal attacks. +Recent Changes You just reverted back to me on the article Cueshé. But if you notice, we aren't going back far enough! +This photo shows both facilities on same page . Thank you for your help with this. +" See thi link from www.Christian-Bible.com, . See the 43rd foot note in that link. ==> =|Ω|=ДPaul|'''''' " +Gah! Scary unicorn! I can quite assure you that I will never (NEVER!!!) write my own Wikipedia article: main reason being that I will never be notable enough for one. At least not if I can help it. +I am not sure this accident even belongs to Oakville, Ontario article but not this one for sure. If someone ever writes a separate article about the monument, that would be the place for the info. +Thank you for experimenting with the page Andy Milonakis on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +You can start with every single revert on a school article, since the general rule is that they are almost all inherently notable. +" Fenner Wind Farm In 'Specifications', a colon or period is missing before ""...the company is based in Italy."" " +" Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cassiterite Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Cassiterite.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. " +"Zeq you asked me to vote on Ramallite's nomination. The problem is that SlimVirgin nominated Ramallite. Considering my current dispute, I think it is inappropriate to vote. Sorry. If you just want my opinion, it seems from the few tussles you and Ramallite have had, you often edit POV bits into the articles, but at the same time Ramallite is incapable of respecting the NPOV facts that you do add or are contained within your edits to the point where his actions are just as bad. An example would be your addition about the number of wells cut off by the barrier (I can't find it now and only recall it somewhat). While some of your addition I remember as strongly POV, there were important facts contained within it such as that the Israel government says that no wells have been cut off. If I remember correctly, Ramallite simply reverted which is not appropriate. Another example I see is part of your recent edit. Some of it I think is POV such as implying all Israelis agree in the first statement, whether you meant ""Israel the government"" or ""Israel the citizens"" is unclear. One thing that irked me was Ramallite's reversion of the following addition: ""The Israeli government states that the purpose of the barrier is to prevent the infiltration of terrorists, and that any hardship imposed on Palestinians is an unfortunate side effect made necessary by terrorism."" This I believe is completely true and you are attributing it so it should be easy to verify. The current version: ""Although the Israeli government has said that the purpose of the barrier is to prevent attacks and that any hardship to Palestinians is an unfortunate side effect made necessary by terrorism, the barrier's opponents say the barrier is the de facto future border of the State of Israel."" is argumentative and implies the first statement is false and last statement is true as a result of the conditional ""Although"" which implies contradiction. This is far more POV than your addition. Considering that he says he will continue to work on the articles where you have the dispute I would be inclined to oppose the nomination based on this alone. Additionally he seems condescending towards you, and I'm sure it is difficult to ignore that considering his edits and stay civil (though staying civil would probably help the dispute). I sympathize but will not vote. " +My RfA Thanks for your support. - +No i read a book on him with resorses for the nicknames every time you hear about him he is called a serial killer so do some research +Blasphamy!!!! Most of you guys are breaking the Wikipedia politeness guidelines AND ARE MAKING BELLDANDY CRY WITH YOUR HATEFUL ACTIONS! Since Belldandy has never had sex with Keichi in the manga or animes how can it be porn at all? The brief and underly drawn scenes of her nudity are not part of her trying to have sex or seduce Keichi. If it was not for Belldandy's mercy, you would all pay with rivers of blood most likely! Repent to the Goddess Belldandy lest she strike ye down!!! +Bell? The article says the original design called for a large bell. The pictures show a large globus cruciger instead. It that a typo, or was the design changed? +" ""It is a thrilling tale of Liam Neeson using a computer."" I was amused by this line and would expect to read it on TV Tropes, but not here on Wikipedia. Perhaps the original author was making a joke, or did not finish the sentence? " +Based on The English alphabet Shona is not my 1st Language but one of the languages i can speak. I read the whole thing but i think it should be noted that the Shona language writing is based on the English alphabet and the main difference is that it misses the Letter L and even in the pronunciation of any word(to the best of my knowledge) +Nicosia, conmtinuous Vandalism You are continuously reverting my and any other contributor edits of the Nicosia article. You are deteriorating the quality of the article and removing improtant pictures of the city´s landmarks and squares in your effort to present a non realistic picture of the city as a predominantly muslim city thus twising reality. +" Request for opinion An opinion was requested here I now offer one. The tone of this article prose-ridden and in-universe. Assume that a person reading this has no idea what a Jak is, and has never heard about previous Jak games or the Jak universe. Look at each part and ask yourself if it is 100% clear that this particular section is about a fictional game that exists in relation to other games (not just in the intro). Remember that you are describing a work of fiction, not telling a story. Also the style is repetitive and boring. Let me pick apart a paragraph - The missions (what is meant by ""mission""?) in Jak 3 are generally either platform-based(platforming) or driving-based. The platform segments involve Jak(""the player"", Jak is a rendered model, someone else is doing the jumping. ""Jak"" is ok for story elements, but gameplay is about the player) jumping from platform to platform (that is what platforming means, right?) battling creatures along the way (he battles in both types of missions, right?). For these segments, he is also provided a rifle (does someone give him a rifle at the beginning of each segment?), the functionality of which changes with the kind of ammunition being used (how so?, also maybe ""changes depending on the ammunition used""). The car driving (""driving"", ""car"" is implied) segments (segmentsX2) usually involve Jak racing against time (prose, try ""have specific time constraints"") to complete a mission (that is what one does with missions), while defending himself against other cars (cars attack people?) or giant Metal Heads (?). When not on a mission (missionX3), Jak wanders the streets of either Spargus or Haven City (prose, and what reason do we have to care which fictional city he is wandering in?), searching for someone to assign him a mission (this sentence makes him sound so lame). I'd do an edit myself, but I know nothing of Jak, and as it is this article does not make me care to. ~ " +By 'justice' Kuiper means the slaughter of unarmed Palestinians and the continued illegal Israeli occupation.24.224.214.165 +Well how would anyone know what needs to be updated? How can random people know what needs updating? The Seal is incorrect and the blue logo should be at the top. I am unsure how it is a conflict of interest.... +" Again, as I've already pointed out, doing a theme summary of 'Hamlet' is really no different from doing a character list. The themes of 'Hamlet' are in 'Hamlet,' the same as the characters of 'Hamlet' are in 'Hamlet.' It isn't complicated, the way some people try to make it. And there is no ""original research"" in simply doing a theme summary, any more than there is ""original research"" in doing a character list. Are you going to look at some book by Harold Bloom to find out whether Polonius is in the play, because otherwise you can't tell? That would be nonsense, of course. The same is true of the themes of the play. The ""source"" for all the themes of 'Hamlet' is ""Hamlet."" That is a fact. And I have no idea where people are getting their strange and eccentric ideas of what a ""theme"" is. Some people who have posted here need to go to Merriam-Webster online, and look up the word ""theme."" A theme is a motif, a recurring idea. That is factually what a ""theme"" is - look it up. A final point, is it too much to ask that words should be spelled correctly in the article? Look at what's there now ""soliloquy"" is misspelled; ""cemetery"" is misspelled. It looks terrible, and it's embarrassing. Please, before you post something, just copy the text over to a text editor, and run a spelling check on it, since there doesn't seem to be a spell checker here. It's great that people want to contribute, but passers-by who see the article with all those misspelled words are going to sneer and say that Wikipedia is crap. Nobody wants that. Why was the original theme summary deleted? I suppose that section could be thought of as a starter to the more broader literary critisism section, but please explain why. " +" June 2009 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — xplicit " +WWF Smackdown: Just Bring It Just Bring It is mainly remembered for it's terribly subpar commentary and PSOne graphics, despite it being the first PS2 Smackdown game. Everyone I talk to knows that this is one pitiful wrestling game. Check out the reviews on Gamefaqs and other sites. Reviews of current Smackdown games also point to this one as the series' biggest flop. +my history edition se it gay +Re: Image:Metamorfoz.JPG Oh, really sorry! How can I delete the repeated image? +AFD I've raised the issue both on the mailing list and at the administrator's noticeboard, but unfortunately, I've yet to see any evidence that anybody is willing to do anything more than let it play out and then discount the sockpuppet votes when the closing tally is compiled. Other than noting sockpuppet votes, I really don't know what else I can do. +all day, and has never been loved by his parents +I hope all goes well with the birth - congratulations! +" User:Dj cathca I've added the """" template to your user page ( process. I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please note that the purpose of a user page is not as personal homepage or Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, but as way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. If you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues here or on my user talk page. You may remove the deletion notice, and the page will not be deleted for the moment, but note that it may still be sent to Miscellany for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. | Talk " +Possible wp:privacy policy violation Seems +Hardly a conflict of interest, the NPIA page is extremely neutral. I can only think that it is because I am British and not American that I am being treated in this way. The NPIA page merely shows the functions of the agency in relation to it's work, it's not controversialor baised. +Yes! And I hope that Onceloose knows that this is a big step in his direction! Because I was right by facts, he was wrong. +Chair Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. +Then do you have a suggestion? Because the way it is written now is incorrect. +" response to another question Re Talk:Homeopathy celebrendorsments ""No, we could use the fact that celebrities have been paid to promote these products to support the statement that homeopathic remedies have been advertised by celebrity endorsement. However, advertising and popularity are two different things - one is hoped to lead to the other by the people paying for the advertising, but it isn't a necessary connection"" Tim Vickers, a statement that could be interprested as arguing that all of the celebrities who support homeopathic medicine have been paid by mystirious ""people"" (Big Homeopathy conspiracy theories?!??). Not only that, Vickers later confessed to ""just cynical about ""celebrity endorsements"" in advertisements"". essentially he admits that he believes that rush limbaugh, Bill Clinton, the Pope, and the British Royal Family were all paid to publically endorse homeopathy. Can that be right? Its possible that Vickers meant something else, but it cant imagine what else. Later on, """"I think any normal person assumes that if a celebrity appears in an advert then they have been paid to do so."" " +I do not understand your commet. Do you agree that it is a compilation album, or a studio album? +Have attempted to discuss endlesslyBerlet resues to address issues. There is a WP:BLP issue which berlet refuses to discuss. Information available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all. Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, unless written by the subject I would also appreciate the invlovement of admins other than the two thus far, both of whom are heavily involved in the diting of the Berlet entry. +How you holding up after being blocked? +IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN THE NAME OF YTMND!IN +Block Boy, there sure dont block a fella for a long time! 18:15, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) +" {{unblock|1= Ruslik0 is incorrect in his block of me. I wasn't edit waring as defined by Wikipedia: I made one reversion of an edit today. Furthermore, Ruslik0 is incorrect that I made a false accusation regarding the objective fact that Jeffro77 is engaging in vandalism: Jeffro77 replaced this entrywhich is very similar to the version that existed there since October 31, 2008, with some improvementswith this entry, giving the excuse in his edit summary of ""WP:FRINGE,"" which doesn't even make sense as an explanation for his edits: i.e., deletion of a number of citations; deletion of the information on theologian Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg's defense of the theology of the Omega Point Theory; etc. As well, there's no need for the large displayed quote, as the previous entry already stated that Prof. David Deutsch doesn't agree that the Omega Point is God; furthermore, Jeffro77's edit deletes the mention of the fact that Prof. Deutsch endorses the physics of the Omega Point Theory. In addtion, Jeffro77's edit isn't even literate, as he give the following mangled citation to Prof. Deutsch: ""Chapter 14: ""The Ends of the Universe,"" with additional comments by Frank J. Tipler; also available here"". Whereas the version before was properly cited: ""David Deutsch, The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes—and Its Implications (London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1997), ISBN 0713990619. Extracts from Chapter 14: ""The Ends of the Universe,"" with additional comments by Frank J. Tipler; also available here and here."" As stated above, Jeffro77's excuse in his edit summary doesn't even make sense, as it doesn't explain why he would delete mention of Prof. Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory, particularly since Jeffro77 himself called Deutsch an ""eminent physicist"" in his own edit (i.e., that statement wasn't there before): of which argues against the notion that Jeffro77 considers the physics of the Omega Point Theory as fringe. Further, Jeffro77 deleted mention of the fact that Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the leading theologians in the world, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory and Tipler's position that the Omega Point is consistent with the Judeo-Christian God. Additionally, while Jeffro77's ""fringe"" claim's aren't even relevant to his edit, they have already been refuted numerous times. Indeed, Jeffro77 himself refutes this claim in this very edit of his: to state again, therein Jeffro77 himself called Prof. Deutsch an ""eminent physicist"" in his own words. So obviously Jeffro77 himself must consider Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory to be noteworthy, and yet he deleted this endoresement in an area where Jeffro77 himself agrees that Deutsch is eminently qualified and replaced it with a large displayed quotation regarding a matter that Deutsch has no qualification or erudition in, even though the previous version already clearly mentioned that Deutsch disagrees that Omega Point is God. Moreover, in this edit Jeffro77 deletes all mention of the fact that an actual trained theologian, Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the world's leading theologians, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory. As well, Prof. Tipler himself has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory and his identification of the Omega Point as being God in a peer-reviewed academic journal: see Frank J. Tipler, ""The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists,"" Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, Vol. 24, Issue 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253. Regarding the physics, Prof. Tipler has published his Omega Point Theory in many peer-reviewed science journals, including a number of the leading physics journals such as Reports on Progress in Physics (one of the world's leading physics journals) and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics journals). The Wikipedia article on the Omega Point Theory lists seven different mainstream peer-reviewed scientific journals in which Tipler's Omega Point Theory has been published (and that's not including the Zygon journal). That is quite a significant amount. Jeffro77 is out of +summarily punish you for telling the truth about me +Opps. The message above was meant for task 2. Sorry for the mistake. +I'll write it when I have some time. +" Thanks for the update, Tony. Your tips on usage will me most welcome. Regards, (Talk) " +Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You can not use a reference that states the opposite of your POV and call it a reference. Please refrain from adding your personal POV to articles. 199.125.109.103 +Hey, that's a good tactic: calling everyone with a different opinion a troll! Zetawolf is so obviously a troll. +This is about the arundhati roy article i think the article has a one sided approach towards arundhati,not a neutral one.i think i added the wrong template.anyways you can make some constructive edits including criticism of roy. +" I too haven't made up my mind on Aetherometry, regardless what other users might attest to by my opposition to calling it pseudoscience without reference. I think your son is in wonderful hands. I placed a comment on talk page ""Danny"", it might resinate with you further. I was blocked for calling WMC the very words your son shouldn't see. And blocked justly so. All I can do is apologize to you and your son for allowing myself to reach a wits end. I do not apologize to WMC, for I feel strongly that he takes people there knowing full well the frustration he unjustly builds within people. I also have a comment and vote for deletion to place in your very well written AfD on aetherometry. This wiki is woefully ill-equipped to deal with such material. I doubt wikipedia can survive many more of these types of encounters before forced to change its ways, or it may sink from respectable existence all together. The other notable Karpinski I spoke of, (at least for people here in DC) was the one who came out in opposition to the U.S. Secretary of Defense, after she was demoted for not following the ""company line"". " +you have been blocked for being a pimped out faggot. sorry loser +It is funny how you removed the whole section jus because I changed the section from DNA to just Genetics in orderto bring a broader spectrum to the section and to keep more section from having to be added. I also seen it funny how you said I was a in a edit war yet you made no mention of your buddy parkwell's well over 25 edits in a 24 hr period on the Melungeon page. +Thanks for the support, folks. +NavyTimes.com Final Flight Video Didn't know how best to include at least the dates of the final traps into the article, but thought I would pass it along to the group for input. Also added it to the external links. — | Talk Got rid of !@#$% verification tags To satisfy a certain editor who insisted on scattering useless tags all over the article challenging obvious facts I already showed him before, I've supplied references. Sheesh, and I don't get any thanks for the work I do. +Rebellion of 1857 Hi Have you taken a decision on the 1857 Rebellion issue? +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. (talk)(email) " +" Talkback Questions by Kangaroo " +I've been working on the revamp with BarnabyPage. I swapped in the revamp temporarily to compare drafts; the new one is much longer of course. Comparing drafts, it's hard to see that I kept almost all of the original material, but since it's been moved about (and occasionally copyedited) it may not be visible, but it's there, generally. IF people have comments or suggestions please give them now; I'll try to swap in the new version in perhaps Wednesday. +" Now, we can be nice again. Talk| Talk| has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding , or to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! " +==re-PWT== It was PWT - I've appended my reply to John Leach below. I have to admit that my students and occasionally I have goaded him but quite frankly he writes rubbish and when challanged when he was a member of the ACS, he responded with a tirade of highly offensive e-mails. By following his posts re-1728 one can see what kind of mind is at work. First Maun's book did not exist, then someone 'reliable' told him it did. He bought it and he will analyse it to see if it is any good! Now it is but John has made mistakes and he's not willing to admit it so although he knows he is posting nonsense, he continues writing some hubris regarding his sources. JohnLp - Blackjack is not a valid source. Anyone can copy out from books by McCann et al but BJ adds his own POV - pages of it. Remove it and he goes beserk. I leave you all to it because as PWT said - all the people interested don't use WP - they have the books. I worry that the whole project is becoming dominated by him and his chums. Follow AA's edits - they are enthusiastic but contain many errors. Change them and you are a sockpuppet or what ever it is - that from Leachy who's had a least a dozen. As you can imagine, at a Uni we have several severs and infinite possible user names. We have to do this because whenever we use oner BJ has it block. it's your problem on WPCric but it is serious becaUause within the next two issues, an ACS member(I am not a member) is writing a damning critique. It is a terrible shame because there are many superb entries. Many of thise by BJ are flawed, some are plain wrong. Anyhow best of luck. (I thought he was on vacation incidentally, or working! You get the drift.) PWT I was at Trent Bridge and I asked PWT to intervene to prevent the cricket site becoming corrupted with errors and Blackjacks efforts to move the contents of his site to WP. We discussed it and contacted KW who agreed there was a chance Blackjack's personalised style of editing was perpetrating errors because he lacked the level of source we have. How sad we have from BJ more hysterical self promotion. I got a student to have a look and they think you have used at least six sock puppets yourself. What makes all this so sad is that the edits you previously posted are fully available. Quite frankly, I don't know what your problem is John. You sent highly offensive emails to PWT which we were looking at on Friday - you sent offensive emails to the editor of the Cricket Statistcian. Neither I, nor Peter have altered pre 1750 cricket with other than the correct information. If Rambling Man(similar to your own Midnight Rambler Blackjack(see his blog)) wants to block these sites he is of course able to do it. What he will be doing is to enable Blackjack/JamesJJames/Albert WM or whatever it ws and several others to become sole editor. A man who has operated multiple sock puppets and is not regarded as an authority by Peter , Keith or any of the acknowledged expert who have publish books of great authority. I know Maun's view of John but it is for him to put it forward. It was PWT who edited and in response to JohnLp added some comments. It is indicative of the thrall Blackjack has laid over half a dozen people that this project is allowing a string of entries riddled with errors that could easily be altered and referenced by those with the correct sources, carry on because for some reason he is their man. WP is about facts not opinions. See 1728 Cricket for the facts on all newspaper entries for that year. Blackjack wants those blocked who spoil his game and I can, by private email, show anyone who wishes more evidence of his approach through his communications with people who disagree with him. The John Leach(MP) wasd posted by a student but you will recall that Blackjack at one time posted his own biography. It was more accurate - marginally. I will now leave this alone completely as Mr Maun's book has sold a thousand copies which I guess are all the people interested in this project so Blackjack's work is thankfully falling on deaf eyes so to speak. And it was PWT. Dr TM Asquith +June 2008 (UTC) POOF YOU DID NOT EVEN READ THE BIO YOU ARE EDITING ON...WHAT A PIECE OF WORK. YOU ARE A TRUE NIMROD. FOR YOUR LIMITED ABILITY TO READ WHAT YOU ARE EDITING ON... DUCKWORTH is the last name of the person, The out of towner carpetbagger puppet (see address etc for proof of my statement), who lost in the 2006 election for the 6th congressional seat... POOF OF YOUR (WIKIPEDIA) THE LACK OF CARE OR FOR THE BIOGRAPHY OF A LIVING PERSON...YOUR REALLY ARE AN ASS.68.75.177.3 15:12, 17 +" Actually, no. There isn't a single place in the United States in which ""hate speech"" is illegal. And any attempts to create such laws have been soundly beaten down by the first court that they confronted. The California law that you meant regards a civil matter, not a crriminal matter. And while I do understand that this article refers to world-wide laws, I feel that it is important to point out that ""hate speech"" is only a hate crime in some of them." +This may be a copyright violation, and in dreadful need of a rewrite. 02:29 Sep 25, 2002 (UTC) +" hi....I just had read what you wrote on my talk page, and this was my response back: Fair enough, but then instead of just removing the whole thing, why didn't you just change what I wrote to ""different genuses"" then?   (As far as my ""tone"", to be honest you seemed to have a ""tone"" in your edit reason where you removed my whole edit.   And you seemed annoyed, so I was just wondering why the seeming attitude.)   But yeah, why couldn't you have altered what I wrote instead of removing the whole thing?   That's what I'm kind of curious about. Because my over-arching point (which IS true) is that cougars are technically not ""lions"", and some people have asked about that.   So couldn't you maybe just modify what I wrote, instead of completely removing it? " +Caitlin Carter Caitlin Carter is the best girlfriend a guy could ask for and her boy friend hunter knows this. And he loves her very very much! They will always be together no matter what and she makes him feel like a king! +Mr. Arivazhakan, who verified his identity through a senior reporter in Sri Lanka, did not reveal his location due to security reasons. +That will be great, thanks +" I think you are right, in that there may be a lot of undue weight in this section. That is why scaling it back would be a good idea, at least until the average editor/reader gets a chance to see the movie. Personally, I haven't seen it (and I will wait till it comes out in theaters) and until then it is hard to make accurate decisions on what the article should contain. I would support a minimalist position in an attempt to have a non-biased article. I would support an effort to take out some of the information but especially to take out headers and integrate the ""rebutal"" section into reception. Keeping the gist but without any superfluous text. " +MUTUAL Intelligibility I've seen many people say that they can understand a different language on the discussion page and then list the languages as mutually intelligible. That is just one-sided intelligibility. Intelligibility differs from person to person and also depends on what is being said. For instance, if you're Russian you may understand a Polish guy completely, but your Russian friend may have no idea what's going on. And if the Polish guy says something else, you might not understand him at all. It is very hard to study intelligibility because there is so much variation. So just because you understand (or don't understand) something in a related language it does not mean that is the case for all speakers (or even most speakers) and it definitely does not guarantee it goes the other way around. Mutual intelligibility is not one guy being able to understand something in another language. This is an example of mutual intelligibility: A Polish guy is in the Czech Republic and asks a Czech guy for directions (in Polish). The Czech understands what he is saying and tells him where to go (in Czech). The Polish guy understands and finds where he needs to go. If the Polish guy didn't understand then it is not mutual intelligibility. And this has to happen for a lot of people, not just those two guys. Alex +It was just a suggestion to have a perceptive to ordinary life. Bangalore article is not as bad as Maharashtra, which had five images of the same Mumbai buildings, just from different angles.... +":Hi Virinchi, There are a lot of problems with the article in its current state, which is why this page has been so quickly nominated for ""speedy deletion"" again. btw, instead of tagging that as {{proposed deletion}}, if you are the original author of the article and no one else has made major contributions, you can tag it with {{db-self}} which makes the process much simpler. Here are some suggestions Don't use personal pronouns like 'we'. Don't use sentences with heavily connoted and unverifiable words or phrases like ""...leaflet campaign, which took the city by storm."" or ""The effect it had on the first IPL match was fascinating"" Instead, simply say the result of the leaflet campaign (to the extent verifiable by your source) in a neutral voice eg: ""In preparation for the next IPL match, No Dada No KKR used leaflet and sms campaigns, and purchased tickets off would-be match attendants to encourage boycotting and create artificial scarcity which resulted in lower turnout in the cricket match."" Note that even this sentence has a problem: 'lower turnout' can't be verified by that source because it would be quoting an obviously biased primary source. Don't say things like ""greatest ever captain"", sentences like this are clearly expressing an opinion. Don't use slang like 'kids'. Don't discuss the future (WP:FUTURE) I think the reading which would help you the most are WP:WORDS and WP:NPOV for help with the non-neutral tone of your article and WP:N and WP:RS for properly citing and providing evidence of notability of the group. Best of luck, Rodney " +"Saying that YouTube and ytmnd are not reliable sources for 'internet phenomenons' is odd, to say the least. These sites are perhaps the PRIME sources, along with 4chan, for net phenoms. Any ""reliable"" source would be making their decision based on the prevalence of footage of Lazytown on these very sites. Lazytown is an internet phenomenon because they are on the very hub of netculture, but to cite the largest sources of net pop-culture isnt reliable? That is curcular logic at it's very best. What better indication than looking at fan communities? Fan comminity sites are PRECISELY what produce internet cultural phenomenons. Go to the source. To accept so-called ""reliable"" sources would cut-off quite a few articles that can be considered common knowledge to people who spend a good amount of time on the net. There is a difference in documentaion processes between the the real world and this one; even between wetware and hardware. It seems Wiki has not kept up to speed, which is surprising as it was spawned in the web. " +", 4 September 2014 (UTC) My apologies for not responding to your previous post about this. When I saw it, I was short of time, and left it to deal with later, and then forgot about it. I would have restored the last incarnation of the deleted article (not earlier versions, which contained copyright infrignements) and moved it to your userspace. However, the article has now been re-created, and since there doesn't seem to be anything significant in the deleted version that is not also in the new article, so there doesn't seem to be much point in restoring it now. I have corrected a couple of grammatical mistakes in the new article. Apart from that, the most important thing needing to be done to the article, in my opinion, is checking the reference citations, and moving them to appropriate parts of the article, rather than all in a list at the end. The editor who uses the pseudonym """" 09:38" +" Wikipedia:WikiProject Disaster management#Naming convention, on the other hand, does show that ""crash"" is an acceptable term. News reports use crash, collision, accident (possibly non-NPOV), and wreck. I don't see any reason to avoid the word ""crash"" here. NE2 " +Mairtine Mairtine! I forgot I had them redlinked in the top list on my page. Please add whatever you can! +→ English Wikipedia← +"Jorfer's complaint above is actually deeper than just whether or not 0.999... = 1 . His issue, rather, is rather the concept of limits actually ""applies"" to ""real life"". He is agreeing that the series (0.9, 0.99, 0.999, ...) has a limit of 1, but he is not agreeing that the corresponding decimal 0.999... should be said to be equal to 1, but that they must instead differ by some as yet undefined infinitesimal amount. The reason that an infinite series in the real number system has a sum equal to the limit of its corresponding partial finite sums is that the real number system is defined in such a way that two numbers which differ by at most an ""infinitesimal"" quantity must be equal. The article Archimedean property has a section that explains why the reals have no non-zero strictly positive infinitesimal numbers. Since 0.999... and 1 differ by at most an infinitesimal quantity, and the only such quanity in the reals is zero, 1 - 0.999... = 0 and thus 1 = 0.999... " +" regarding International humanitarian law The protection of hospitals is according to the Geneva convention. The agreement from 1949 was also signed and ratified by the USA. According to that agreement hospitals are protected. The exception is: unless the facilities ""are being used, outside their humanitarian function, to commit acts harmful to the enemy"" as rightly commented in the article. But: Even if enemy combatants are inappropriately using the facility for shelter, the ""rule of proportionality"" usually forbids such attacks because of the high potential for civilian casualties. (why the usually as a qualifier?) And it is not the: Human rights organization Human Rights Watch stated that the laws of war require the attacking force to issue a warning, and wait a reasonable time for a response, before attacking a medical unit being misused by combatants. but the Geneva convention itself that requires a warning by the attacking force. And that is not a choice. Why having qualifiers, as if the Geneva convention is not clear on the point of the protection of a hospital. And this scenario, an unannounced air strike by an AC-130 definitely falls outside a hypothetical proportional attack. Why being so ambiguous about it, the Geneva conventions forbids the attack on a hospital, except in exceptional circumstances! " +Please delete the Draft:Later Sui Empire. I Want to make new draft. Please delete the Draft:Later Sui Empire. I Want to make new draft. P lease delete also the deletion page and debate pages. +]]  21:19, 9 February +I told you. I knew you'd delete my post. What are you hiding. What are you afraid of? +An email from who? I see no difference between a post on a forum and an email. +"Thank you, sir, for that (for correcting the citation so that it properly points the read to the correct URL). I might note, however, that the way you have done it (and I have no idea how to do it correctly in Wikipedia), it gives the date in the footnote as being ""15 November 2008"". That is the date that you put the corrected URL/footnote in. The actual date of the footnote is 4 June 1994. The author is, of course, Selywn Raab, The New York Times' most noted mob historian. Thanks if you can further correct the footnote/citation. " +" Correction: 1993 Super Bowl Ad Page currently reads: ""A Nike commercial shown during the 1993 Super Bowl XXVII featured Jordan and Bugs Bunny playing basketball against a group of Martian characters."" This is incorrect; the ad features Bugs and Michael playing against four humans." +" Explanations of the expansion - In hist book ""Svitjod resor till Sveriges ursprung"" (1998) about the Svear, Mats G. Larsson argues that one possible reason for the increase in overseas voyages is that political cohesion at home meant that young men seeking fame and fortune began travelling more abroad rather than raid neighbours in Scandinavia (although these, of course, continued). Should we mention this as on of the possible explanations? Cheers " +Fehime Sultan Edward you really a stupid man, where are your sources that she had a girl who called Nemzade (1913-2000) I often told you look like your self...there is nor sources in the Article Fehime Sultan that she had a daughter... Here look this: 2) H.I.H. Princess Fahima Sultana. b. at the Dolma Bahche Palace, Constantinople, 2nd August 1875 (d/o Mail-i-Sharvat). Rcvd: the Nishan-i-Shafakat 1st class. m. (first) at the Yildiz Palace, 12th September 1901 (div. at Ortakoy, 4th November 1908) H.H. Damad 'Ali Ghalib Pasha (b. at Constantinople, 1871; d. at Tashvikaya, Istanbul, 26th June 1950), Vizier 1904, former husband of H.I.H. Princess Khadija Sultana - see above. m. (second) at the Ortakoy Palace, 5th June 1910 (morganatical) (div. 1927) Captain Mahmud Bey (b. at Constantinople, 1880; d. 19xx), late Imperial Ottoman Cavalry. She d. at Nice, France, 15th September 1929 (bur. Selimiye Camii, Damascus). http://web.archive.org/web/20020421155331/http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Turkey/turkey12.htm Oh what a uncircumcised stupid Man you are ... +you're a complete tool= look at your talk page, its just pages and pages of people asking why you intefered with their shit without being asked. first u come into a private converstaion between me and andother wikipedia retard and threaten to block me and revert my contributions next u threaten to block me because i had the audacity to write on ur talk page and request you leave me along +Future Protests Protests like 2013 Anti-Sri Lanka protests or Attacks on Sri Lankans in Tamil Nadu in 2012 taking places years after the the war and future protests will not part of the War they not are part of the Sri Lankan Civil War which ended in 2009. +I agree with my own socks above (because I wrote the foregoing myself, but forgot to sign off the right way) 00:40, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) +" While I am somewhat dissapointed by D'Adamo's lack of footnotes, and frustrated by his avoidance of indexes, I haven't yet found a credible direct dispute to any significant claims of his. I am aware of a text that might indicate behavior of lectins on stomach tissuus would need to be directly studied, but I wasn't willing to spend in excess of $200 US (iirc) to find out what exactly it found, depite it being a ""real"" scientificly strict (apparently, as I didn't actually get to read the) study. While not as rigourously strict with the science as it should be (at least what is presented in his books) ER4YT doesn't seem to be significantly paranormal or disprovable. So while it has a stigma of pseudoscience, that stigma hasn't really been justified. Some supposed refutation I have come across turned out to be of even poorer quality, either reflecting it's own pseudoscience, or a lack of familiarity with the nominal subject. I would really like to see some explicit, maybe even rigorous debunking of D'Adamo's (occasionaly controversial? I can't see why) offerings. As of yet, I consider this closer to protoscience than unfalsifiable pseudoscience. In any case, I don't think that anything I previously posted on this matter is all that fantastic. Is the mere mention of Doctor D'Adamo, or Eat Right For Your Type (ER4YT) enough to invalidate the respose I offered? Other than that vague stigma, is my above answer to the utility of divergent blood types unhelpful or incorrect? I do believe that I was careful enough to avoid anything that wasn't NPOV. Maybe, I shouldn't have tread so lightly, so as to provoke more of a direct response. Because while I like how it advocates my [Type O] consumption of most animal proteins, I find it's avoid lists including wheat and dairy to be cumbersome." +the hebrew should be deleted. ILLEGAL OCCUPATION does not establish a language. +Barneca I know you. 88.106.233.71 Lynne +How good are you the Turks! First your MIT secret service makes the arson in our islands and our mainland and then you send firefighters so that we become grateful to you! Good old Ottoman policy! Cleander +", 1 July 2010 (UTC) Carol, you are lead weight with regards to this subject. Everyone on this project would be happier if you left. Your image of ""objectivity"" is flawed with an undue respect for authority, and for this reason your opinion is below respect. 22:05" +Article discussion Dbachmann seems to have engaged in a bit of WP:canvassing as seen here. At the very minimum he should have let editors here know that this article is being discussed elsewhere. +" Re: Coca-Cola Sorry if I rudely didn't drop an explanatory note at your talk page; it was rude of me and poor behavior. Please see our Manual of Style to understand the correct formatting and appearance standards. The one issue with your additions is that the captions for the images are entirely too long and full of extraneous information; image captions are not museum display cards and do not serve to detail every single item appearing in the image; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a museum. They should also never state ""note the x"" or other similar attention drawing text, per WP:W2W, one of our guidelines on writing prose. They also had inappropriate use of capitalization, boldface and other formatting issues. For example, ALLCAPS spelling is never used for emphasis, as it is read as shouting on the Internet. As for the Coca-Cola additions, I took them out for lack of relevance. The Coca-Cola article is about the drink, not the company; that's at The Coca-Cola Company. The information in those images is better placed there, but in the article text, not the image caption. The other reversions were based on similar concerns; the same sort of formatting and caption length issues were present there. In the one article, for example, the caption was nearly as long as the rest of the text in the article, when that text should really go in the article's body text instead. Once again, my apologies for biting your head off, as you were editting in good faith. I hope that my poor behavior doesn't turn you off to the collabrative process and that, with a bit of polishing, you can add much to our growing base of knowledge. (As a ln aside, the correct way to sign a post is with four tildes (~).) " +Go fuck yourself, you piece of shit. +" Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Shadow " +I did it to Snopake too (and I think Ayelie once) Will +I was thinking that a couple of days ago but then wondered how it would affect a few of the gnomish types. While I've never used the delsorting stuff, for example, I know people who do and who presumably must be grateful for the very small number of people who do that thing. - +" Actually it's not ""unsourced"" my source is the game directly which I have played and invested over $1,000 USD into. I've PAID for the information given with my own wallet. You re-verting first hand information is disruptive. Get a life." +" File:Bigdigtips.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bigdigtips.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. hi! " +Def Jam controls Please stop restoring the controls info. Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. (Talk) +Documentation (adding as I find) Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy/Archive_14#Richard_Nixon +Freemasonry - everything missing Everything about Freemasonry is completely missing. Sources: 10,000 Famous Freemasons from K to Z from Harry S. Truman http://spokanecda.com/Masonic%20Temple.html http://www.spokanemasonictemple.org/History/History.htm http://www.srmason-sj.org/web/journal-files/Issues/sep-oct05/coop.html http://www.matinecock.org/portal/desktopdefault.aspx?tabindex=2&tabid;=23&item;=10 Some facts: Masonic laying of the foundation stone: Army War College february 21, 1903 Yellowstone Park (Grand lodge of Montana) april 24, 1903 Masonic Temple, Tacoma, Washington May 22 1903 Masonic Temple, Spokane, May 26, 1903 Officebuilding of the House of Representatives April 14, 1906 Masonic Temple 13. Str. and New York Ave. Wash. D.C., june 8, 1907 Pilgrim Memorial august 20, 1907 Speech to the Masonic Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania because of the 150th anniversary of the masonic raising of George Washington in 1902 One of the things that attracted me so greatly to masonry […] was that it really did live up to what we, as a government, are pledged to - of treating each man on his merits as a man. webmaster@sgovd.org, Germany +I am a gigantic pedantic twat +Oh, stfu ruber chiken. We'll invade your country. +"Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Three " +As the only reasonable mod I've run into around here today - Why are mods here so eager to increase people's warning level without due diligence into the situation? +" Reliable sources and list guidelines Please see discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. My recommendation is that this List be stubbified to an alphabetical list, removing the content that should have been added to individual bios and should have used better sources. (Talk) " +That he will continue to doubt or refuse the fact that the Spitfire II manual as of July . That he will tende As shown above, the only misquotes are made by him. For example, he also removed the mentioning of the problem Quill described report +2nd the new color scheme. pedia +" Nevermind. It has been fixed. – (talk) " +You can undo and block all you want, but it will stay in history forever. +==== Vendetta87the name says it allis obviously an interested party in this case. I, and it appears many others, have made a habit of checking up on the defamatory postings of this one individual who continues to return to this site. The content of his/her comments put wikipedia at risk. Bill Teilman a well known political partisan is, as always, more about speed than accuracy. I would not be surprised if, after the dust from any trial settles, he is one of a number of libel defendants on account of his writingsreposted by Vendetta97. Let's us not put Wikipedia in the same situation. -an informed observer +" Hello Bplavsic, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of contents Department directory Need help? Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Bplavsic, good luck, and have fun. – talk " +. I'd rather not be part of your ego tripper exploits. I know you're desperate to try and prove yourself with your 'power' on an internet site, but stay away from my account. Thank-you +Living2 or LIVING2 Thoughts? I would have presumed it was LIVING2 but have no real reason to support this except the on-air graphics. - +" Attack on aimulti Dear Todd, I have looked at your history and you seem to be a real Wikipedia editor. The person who is accused of being a sockpuppet of mine is known to me but other than that we have no connection by blood, business or anything else. The attack on every contribution I have made (107) pages covering a wide range of topics has been organised by a group called ""Dissident Action Group Exposed"". Over the years they have distributed smear letters over the internet saying I am a child molester, blow up churches and other such nonsense. Do a yahoo search if you doubt my word. Also look at the edit history of the two people I named. They both joined within one day of each other (only about 10 days ago) and have made hundreds of contributions since then. ALL ATTACKS ON AIMULTI. You seem a fair person so all I ask is you check out what I have said above and then act as you see fit. Wikipedia is not the place to act out personal vendettas. I hope you agree. " +Vandalism Stop vandalizing pages, or you will be banned. +" WP:BLP warning Please do not add unsourced material to a biography of a living person, as you did to Franck Ribéry. In addition, please do not edit war with other users over the inclusion of such material. Instead, pursue dispute resolution—beginning with a discussion of the matter on the article's Talk page. If you have a reliable source for your material, then post it to the Talk page or cite it when re-adding material to the article, and that will be the end of the matter. If you continue to revert other user's edits to include the material without a source, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you TALK " +"The research of Bill Benson is irrelevant. The United States Supreme Court has held that Congress would have the power to impose an income tax even if the 16th Amendment had never been ratified. Cheers! T " +" There is no longer a ""bay"" at Turtle Bay it was filled in long ago, and when it existed it as more of a cove than a bay. I guess it depends on what the focus of the ""Bays"" catalog is. " +I understand, but I have a proposal. Okay, I'm here to make a proposal. I'm almost certain that Tyson Kidd and Cesaro are going to face The Usos for the tag titles at Fast Lane. Fast Lane is only two weeks away exactly. If they do win the titles at Fast Lane, I get to keep my page. But, if they don't win the titles, I'll delete this page. Brass Ring Club may not be the official name but that's what they were going with and I even edited out Adam Rose from the current members section. It seems like the only fair way to get through this problem. Also, you can edit my page ANYTIME you want to. Hell, you can even put the needed sources in for me if you want to. Will you accept my proposal? +" You may give it up right now, because you are not going to have your way on this. I know more about the Manual of Style than you, and I'm applying correctly. You have now been applying it incorrectly twice. Let me educate you: The titles of the pages in question are List of stadiums by capacity and List of association football stadiums by capacity, respectively, which had the words ""sports stadia"" and ""football stadiums"" bolded, respectively. That's the clearly non-MOS-compliant version that was initially in place and which you reverted to, in apparent ignorance of the Manual of Style. What's worse, since it is a separate violation of the manual of style: parts of those bolded phrases were wikilinked, as are the phrases in your ludicrous recent edits. I recommend you cease editing those pages now, since you evidently don't have a firm grasp on our Manual of Style. I'm reverting, and suggest you ask more experienced editors than yourself at the Manual of Style talk page. Thank you. 85.197.52.156 " +Eh? What personal attach was there? +Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Tape Sculptures) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +. Furthermore these were written down prior to his birth too and regardless of their objective veracity they are indispensable to the article similar to Dalai Lamas, Karmapas and Khyentses as long as predicated with 'it is believed' etc. which I did +" Couple of Qs re notability Hi ""Chris"", Just seeking information generally. Firstly on Tonbridge Angels' page you amended the criteria for former players to exclude captaincy, and on Margate's removed the section altogether. I'm afraid I missed the earlier section on Margate's page, my mistake. However, ""duplication"" apart, am wondering about your reasoning of ""vague/dubious"" as these criteria are ones I have seen on any number of non-league club pages or why the section was not deleted after the earlier addition of Barry Thornley (not by me!) which created it (the section)? On the Tonbridge page I am wondering at what level captaincy would be valid, as once again this criteria appears on numerous pages. Thanks for any info.. Regards. " +" Agree. I was feeling good until this. It is unclear who is at the steering wheel of this proposal, and what is their investment in having this ""committee"" whose duties are undefined and the selection process of which is unspecified. — (Talk) " +Thanks Oh, Thankyou, im a newcommer so i didnt know. +remember...the UN has said that the occupation of Palestine is illegal! That certainly has bearing on this issue and tends to discredit the Israeli position! 06:24 Nov 13, 2002 (UTC) +REDIRECT Talk:Hendrick K van Rensselaer +Make it a category under Indian cuisine Someone proficient please make a new category as Karnataka cuisine under Indian cuisine. +Info Needed- Do you have Board Shorts, what type of underwear do you wear. +Greed is big, and I've also heard some stuff about how a non-market economy will inevitably collapse due to misinvestment (some sort of principle, don't remember the name though, but it was supposedly a major cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union). What does this have to do with Wikipedia? +hello james,greatful to your post as my first message.i was about to ask nepalichoro to help me in creating in that topic (one of the malls of kathmandu). +Unblock {unblock|It wasn't my fault, I didn't know that a user was not able to make such edits. Honestly I believed the edits I made were constructive edits that were to the benefit of the Wiki community}} +Stop vandalizing the FDNY page on the Air Support Controversy. If you were actually literate you would see that the citations to the section are contained within it. It is a summary of a report that was presented using FDNY and NYPD documents by WABC-TV (NY). It contains nothing added, no weasel words, but simply a recantation of what was reported on national television. If that is not good enough for you, sit on a Halligan Tool. I have forgotten more about NYPD and FDNY than you will ever learn. NITWIT! And if you take it out again I have 50 other people who will re-add the same section. +" I am the copyright holder for the material at http://ontariopianos.com and I give my permission for the material on that website to be re-used in my article here on Wikipedia. I am not sure how to go about removing the ""close paraphrasing"" notice. " +Although it mentions that he is the first Tamil scribe to meet with Irom Sharmila Xmas 2013 it doesn't point out that it was only after his intervention that the Government of Manipur ended the 9 year illegal isolation order. Up till then anyone trying to meet with her had no idea of the process. They would go via friends or local NGOs who filtered all visits or would just be told it was impossible. Since his visit after the High Court was informed by the GoM that they were adopting hte Assam Prison Manual regulations for all prisoners the procedure to see Sharmila is as follows: You apply in person to the SSP Imphal Central Jail and fill in a form stating your name address prisoner you wish to see and purpose of visit. Then you pay a ten rupee admin fee and after a brief interview confirming what you are allowed to take with you and what you cannot you are either granted a chit for a twenty minute interview or you are given written reasons for refusal. If you press for written reasons this may change the official's mind. Otherwise it may be recorded if at all that you changed your mind. Visiting days are Mondays Wednesdays and Fridays for women prisoners in Manipur. She is kept at the JNIMS security ward some distance away from the main prison. Just that. He did what the HRLN had claimed that they were trying to do since 2006 and he was assisted by their lawyers but it was on his request 7 years later and I do not believe they would have done so without his persistence. I don't know how to sign things my name is Desmond Coutinho, Irom Sharmila's fiancee. +"I changed this to ""science fiction"" as space opera seems the wrong categorization to me, and as the article on space opera describes that genre as emphasizing romantic adventure, interstellar travel, and space battles, none of which are main elements in Starcraft (though one must assume that interstellar travel takes place, and there are a few space-station battles). If anyone can help me out with a better subgenre, I'd appreciate it, but the assignment of the game to space opera seems highly specious (though perhaps there's something I'm missing?). " +Taking Chopa as an example, in the Discography section the album information for each of their 3 albums is pretty much the same thing that can be found on each individual album's page. The albums are already linked to. So what I am suggesting is removing what is duplicative and migrating anything that does not appear for each individual album onto that respective album's article page. In the end, you would be left with a Discography section listing all 3 albums. I also noticed the Notes on selected pieces section; this section be taken out of the Chopa article and appear in the pages for all 3 albums containing only those notes relevant for that particular album. As it appears right now, the reader cannot tell where a song appears unless he/she scrolls up and searches. It would be more relevant to have the specific information pertaining to songs appearing on particular albums on the respective album's pages. +Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Stawinoga I've added an explanatory paragraph, and the article's been updated slightly. Have a read, see if it changes your mind - no worries if it doesn't ) +Leaf The last few days I have been working in this article. I think it is now optimal. Could you take a close look at it and rephrase where necessary. 19:14, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC) +I'll layout my mindset when writing Dennis Lo. The employer contacted me because he had previously worked with me on another project unrelated to this. He asked if I could write up an article. I told him I needed 3 days to decide if I would take the job to determine if an article could even be written that was met guidelines. I determined that there was, accepted the job, and wrote it. Now, could the article have been written by anyone without getting paid? Yes. In fact, red links for Dennis Lo already existed in two other articles. I gathered as many sources as I could and wrote what they said. Did that prohibit me from being critical? As seen in the Tops In Blue article, I can be critical of topics I have a COI in (I have a friend who was in TiB at the time I rewrote that article). So what does payment get the employer? Well, he doesn't have to wait for some random disinterested party to get around to writing it. They arn't buying my integrity, it's not for sale. They arn't buying my bit, that's not mine in the first place. As far as I am concerned, me getting paid gets me to write in topic areas I normally wouldn't. That's the only 'effect' it has on me. I'm much more interested in this project than picking up some crappy freelance job that's going to lead to me being asked to leave. My guess is that most established editors feel the same way. I can see where paid editing firms who hire folks who have never touched Wikipedia is a bad thing, but for those of us who have put our hearts into this project, you're making a very offensive claim that we arn't fully committed to the success of this thing.v/r - P +http://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-fascinating-nuggets-another-bewildering-150348488.html +Let the closing admin speak. +" Please don't accuse him for misunderstanding your comment without exploring the possibility that just maybe, your grammar and syntax is not the best. To be honest, I have to take extra time to read your comments to understand what you're saying; you repeatedly accusing others of ""misrepresenting"" or ""misunderstanding"" your comments instead of considering your own faults tell me that you may not have the level of understanding required to make edits. Moreover, please be more civil and generally nicer to other Wikipedians; a major portion of this discussion is nonacademic because of your comments that attack other users or are disruptive to intelligent discussion. " +Quick question Any idea what's wrong with this page? Message +I don't think he fits into any of the current subcategories. +":Wikidata is in an advanced stage and contains useful data for this project. Using the Autolist2 tool we can retrieve the number of articles by entity. For example, searching for the ""instance of"" ""Castle"", it shows that there are 11,000+ castles in Wikidata. I'm not sure if add this info to a new column ""Wikidata"", next to the ""Progress"" columns. I still have to figure out how to get only English Wikipedia results. Thoughts? " +Words to Watch Slim and I are ready to take it live, pending any tweaks you want to make beforehand. It strikes me there are two basic ways to bring it online: Directly replacing the text of the existing Words to avoid page, followed after !brief discussion by a retitling to Words to watch. As Words to watch, arguing from there that it should supplant Words to avoid. The latter would be more politic; the former is certainly more efficient. Thoughts?— +" The second time you removed this it was from the ""criticism"" section. Edwards was a noted critic of restrictions on DDT use, and the material I added here need not be in the form of a peer-reviewed study; it cogently expresses the views of a well-known critic. " +Thank you for deleting those pix Hey Athaenara - thanks for that - it sorted out this message sent to The Skier of Dudiness +" Thanks, figured it might be an autoblock ). One more thing, would it be permissible for me to the ""psychopath"" post from Talk:Coat of arms of Croatia? (TALK) " +You deleted his but not mine? Why are you doing this just to prove a point. If you would just delete them you could end this. +6 YEARS COMES OUT SEPTEMBER 8 ON NETFLIX GLOBALLY AND 30 DAYS PRIOR IN THEATERS I'M SO HAPPY! Are you excited?! Source http://deadline.com/2015/07/netflix-indie-strategy-slate-elizabeth-banks-sarah-hyland-duplass-brothers-1201472048/ +Sure, I'll listen to a fag. Go suck a dick or something. Maybe you and Originalsinner should get together. I hear he likes to take up the ass dry, just like you! +Heh You got what you deserved in the end ) +" Logicus, your block will have expired soon. I agree with Jaimaster's analysis. The block was not only improper because of Raul654 involvement he's contesting that, but I highly doubt that his position would stand up under ArbComm scrutiny if it ever comes to that , it was procedurally improper as well, i.e., you were not properly warned. And what you'd done fell short of the level of disruption that would justify a block, in my opinion, even had you been properly warned. There were problems with your behavior, sure, but blocking you wasn't where we should start to deal with it. We should work together so that you become a more effective participant in the community. If you decide to request unblock, my suggestion is to simply ask for an independent review, do not make long arguments. Keep it simple. Your block is not an emergency, and it, and Raul654's subsequent responses, may turn out to be very foolish moves on his part and to have no long-term consequences for you, if you simply do nothing. If you were to, for example, become uncivil and tendentious, it could complicate the situation. Watch. This could get ""interesting."" " +Thanks for the compliment! I am not working on it right now, as periodic table is my focus and I have limited free time, but once periodic table passes or fails I'll start working on alkaline earth metal again. In fact, I'm trying to model the article after alkali metal, as the groups are somewhat similar. Theory11 +Jack Dawson was being metaphorical. He isn't royalty of any description, he's a peasant. He isn't even a king of peasants. If I had a dog, and my dog had a child and my dog's child had a pet, that would be Jack Dawson. Lord Voldemort however, is a Dark Lord, which is to say, a warlord with magical powers. Warlords actually rule people, thereby qualifying them for the title of Lord. Furthermore, no I don't know you in real life, you just remind me of someone I used to know. +( ) We do not represent Amble, we are merely an independent website promoting the town which I believe does nit violate your policy - however another person who has removed the link to our website on several occasions (maliciously we believe) is employed by a Quango and has edited the page on several occasions adding links to their websites. +J .Mabel you are a GARBAGE! You delete Sorin Cerin? +I am not evading, Musarabbyahamd is not my ID {unblock|reason= Who are you? JamesBWatson? Why are you annoying me? What did I done for you? What I have offensive to you? Tell me. 103.9.114.58 }} +You are a faggot!68.33.41.181 +I haven't read the Russian article properly as yet, but it also has links to the wrong Cossack organisations (that is, the genuine ethnic groups with news about their latest concert tours, ad infinitum). +Assuming that comment is directed at me, I am quite aware of the consequences and am hoping that someone neutral (in OM's eyes) will tell OrangeMarlin that very fact so he ceases his constant barrage of spurious accusations. +Don't believe there is any issue with the POV, but agree it needs attention to formatting - going to remove the POV tag. +December 6 last year +(UTC) Wouldn't it be ironic if, when Paul does die, he dies in a car crash.......... 00:47, 12 August 2007 +Thank you for your comment. Question. I already submitted a long statement on the evidence page. Can I change it, delete some, add some? +Slovenian football clubs founding years Hello, i noticed many new articles for defunct slovenian football clubs in the last time and most of them seems correct. But I think there is a problem about some clubs and that there shouldn't be two articles about the same club. There I have in mind specially Factor and Triglav. I don't know where and how the assocciation got those dates, but i think they are somehow not correct. The problem is that those clubs have a competition continuation and are different cases as Olimpija or Ljubljana. Interblock was supposely formed in 2007, so please explain how is it possible for a new formed club to start competing in a first league. The same thing for Triglav, how is it possible for a new formed club Triglav Kranj to compete (and win) in second league 1997, when the club was just formed that year. +Hello idiot!!! I'm tired to see too many cretinos in Amesh Wiki. +Was in Scotland, Loch ness, Inverness, Edinborough and stuff, back now but i might need some sleep... first . +" I've changed it to ""9/11 Truth movement is the collective name of organizations and individuals that question whether the United States government was either negligent toward or complicit in the September 11 attacks, or else actively blocking a full investigation of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings."" That should cover Richard Gage and his movement. " +" My New Sign D (Sup) " +Thank you for the DYK. I didn't want to take it there without sources. +The only other ip possibly is the one on my laptop before I registered an account possibly? And the first part of the former was a joke of course (not out to offend anyone). +My point is that things that are common knowledge do not need citations. Would you need citations for a statement saying the KKK hates blacks? Not to mention, the Something Awful Forums article has a whole section discussing anti-furryism within the forums. Saying that I must know the specific number of SA Forum posts that make fun of furries is absurd. +REDIRECT Talk:History of Czechoslovak nationality +03:26, 21 January 2008 JonnyKeen (Talk | contribs) +"So its okay for a woman editor to be called a ""cunt"" a ""Bitch"" a ""cock shit"" and repeatedly subjected to obscenities like ""Fucking"". That isn't a big deal, but if she complains about it THEN it is a a big dealwrongdoing on her part. Obviously the concept of basic fairness did not enter into your decision. Your handling if this is dripping with sexism and bias. " +Yeah. What Bugs said! +" Woo Hoo Great to see True at First Light on the main page - congrats! Also glad to see you popping up on my watchlist again, all the best, ><>°° " +I was told I need to give you 30 days to fulfill my request.122.49.151.145 +umm why didnt you say why you reverted my edit about cole being the voice of the wwe other ppl have said he is making it not self proclamed if you disagre you could at lest have the courtsy of saying why not just reverting and expecting me to go with it +" (UTC) Articles about colleges are not the right place for articles and information about high schools.                     ~Rayvn  15:26, 12 May 2015" +You'll never guess who this is (logged out), but I won't be protesting blocking of this IP, I'll just get another one +"Stop being a baby, and read the prior paragraphs noting that the IP adress is a community address that many people may be using all at once. Sheesh. And try using the 'search' aspect of Wikipedia to find a term better to describe your discontent rather than saying it's ""not cool"". What are you going to do anyway?.... " +facts at the time still stick +One opinion says he is born in Cuba, the other position says that information is not right. If you want a balance as you say, you have to find a balance in this arguing by just skipping this information. You write on your wikipage you are a humanist, so be that tolerant and respect the opinions of others. You are totally alone with your opinion. No book indicates he is born in Cuba. Your sources are too weak. The way you aruge and act here makes me suspicious that you have an emotional, personal interest by attacking de Zayas. Please leave your personal conflicts outside Wiki. Thanks. MP +By the way it is very simple: USA violated the Iranian territorial waters. USA has bombed Iranian territory. This makes the USA a direct combatant. +Karina Lozano Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for writing this article. Unfortunately it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles. However, please do not be disheartened by what may happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted. Please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For more help, see Help:Contents and to find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top. +The article Wangfest has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FreplySpang +MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  fan +REDIRECT Talk:Flag of Hong Kong +" So... Can we add a citation next to the quote ""virulent campaign"" without people getting angry/insta-revert? 86.140.193.228 " +" This time you have managed to leave a message without collateral vandalism so I will reply. ""Check youtube ..."" - if you cannot be bothered to provide a link, why the should I waste my time searching for it? But that is not the point - I do not need to check YouTube - I believe you that it exists. The question is not whether it exists but whether it is notable enough for Wikipedia and a dozen or more deleted titles confirm that it is not notable. Here are just a few from the deleted pages list: Yu-Gi-Oh! the Abridged Series (96 revisions deleted) Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Series (181 revisions deleted) Yu-Gi-Oh: the Abridged Series (63 revisions deleted) Yu-Gi-Oh Abridged (24 revisions deleted) I leave you to find the relevant AfD discussions. — (Talk | contribs) " +I do agree it should be moved to [[Hummer H3] page. +The Rules section of 4chan's Page includes a description of permitted content on each board. +Collapse/Hide text Bunch of uncivil nonsense. +The permissions on those are as they were. Since you seem to understand the permissions process better than I, feel free to take whatever action you feel is necessary to get the official ducks in a row. +. But read thi first and let me know your thought +Imperial Russia section used as an example on the Help page I have just changed the example of linking to a section of an article given in Help:Editing (in the Links, URLs section) as the previous example no longer works. The example now used is History of Russia#Imperial Russia. If this section is removed or the title of it is changed, please update the help page. +" Excellent. Sustainable development ought to be a given, in my opinion – making a little more money to today in exchange for future generations' very lives strikes me as the worst sort of greed and shortsightedness. But on to Wikipedia matters: When including references to URLs, don't leave a space between the opening bracket and the website address. I've fixed two of these on the Irrigation in Peru article; your first assignment as my adoptee is to fix the third. Also, be sure to sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). I also encourage you to add a link to your talk page in your signature. I look forward to working with you. I should be able to make more thorough comments about the Peruvian irrigation article later in the week. If I haven't gotten back to you with more feedback by Sunday, please drop me a line on my talk page. –  • Tok " +, 31 July 2010 (UTC) Ling.Nut, I may be able to help you summarize the key points in condensed version. I don't have time to work on it now, but the goal would be to not drop the entire second paragraph. Please keep it for now, and I'll try to work on that soon. 09:40 +Theirs so many thing wrong with what you said above you were the one who first stated he has nano technology your speculating he got rescues by cobra commander wouldnt we see him in jail your saying he's alive get a third opinion by anybody and I'm right did you see proof that he survived did you see him healing at any part during the fight any yeah that happens in movies people die It doesn't matter if you like a character people die that was a horribly placed arguement when you think all that happened with out a trace of it in the movie or actors or whatever and then blame someone for not believing what you think +" Grab some glory, and a barnstar Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. Talk! " +To refer to your point Bjarki, I too was looking for local impact, but I've struggled to find much, most possibly because the news on local events might be in Icelandic. But as travel has paramount attention after what happened last year, that information is easier to track down and source. And I do agree with Lidos on the page title; I actually intended on creating the article with that title, but sadly was beaten to it by the original creator of this article. Renaming will be considered at a later time once more information has been collected. But also considering how short lived the current incident was (it seems the ash clouds are dissipating), more news on the incident might be harder to track. +" lets do some POV analyse: the text now says However, on 6 June, the effective strength of the 12th SS Panzer Division was 20,540 men and 150 tanks.[42] By 23 August, it was reduced to ""weak infantry elements, no tanks, no artillery the editor claims the statement come from: Stacey, Colonel Charles Perry; Bond, Major C.C.J.. ""Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War: Volume III. The Victory Campaign: The operations in North-West Europe 1944-1945 what says the article of colonel stacey? "" On 22 and 23 August Army Group ""B"" reported3 the state of its eight armoured divisions as follows: 12th S.S. Panzer Division—300 men, 10 tanks, no artillery. stacey says that the rest of the divisions were casualties? no! the 12 SS suffered 8.000 casualties... and the rest was pulled out of the line. the remaining 300 men are a battle group lend to another division. from the 12 SS article The units in the Division that were not fit for combat were ordered to pull back to Germany on 8 September, leaving behind a small Kampfgruppe attached to the 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich. ( with citiation ) so what makes the editor here? he takes a statement then he poved it a bit with the word ""reduced"" , than he claims no tanks. knowing it is wrong... by the way the reported strenghts were grabenstärke... the sense of this statement was to bring the reader some idea about german casualties on this battle. by the way the 12 SS not even participated the full battle^^ eye, thats what u call ""reliably-sourced material"" maybe the editor should be banned for a short while? he faked a quote to support his POV -) please tll me eye, is this POV ? which encyclopedia would come to the moronic idea of using this statement when it his has no overall figures?" +You are a prick Just thought others might like to know. mwalla +AFD for Vedontakal Vrop I'm a bit confused by this closure. While on a purely vote-counting stance there appears to be no consensus, the arguments advanced by the deletion side are so clearly superior that it seems impossible to conclude that the article should remain in place. How much less notable does a subject have to be to get deleted than the existence of no sources beyond a single student paper from India? +" Andrew, I was in two minds about including AD. The only reason to include it was because people are unused to three digit years. At least I am! ;) Anyway, I'm happy to see it go. I love simplicity, just won't surrender it unless clarity isn't thrown out with the bathwater. As I said, I'm content. Explaining the ""nearest 50 years"" rule is great. ) Also, I was going to explain the contents were only as specific as chapter. You have done this in a very neat and clear way, thank you! Great to have you at work on things! Yes, I thought about linking the books or not. The main argument against was that it took so long to enter them! However, the point of linking every repeated entry in a sortable list imo is that people may sort on city, for example, to see manuscripts near their home, say. If they see that Thessalonians is in a university library 125 miles away, maybe they will click on the link to Thess to see what Wiki editors have said about the book. Instead of looking for the first instance of Thessalonians in the table, or trying to decipher the abbreviation they just click on the field in the record they are looking at. I agree about not over-Wiki-ing, especially in the body of an article, and especially if different words are given the same link. Tables, by their nature are speedy reference systems, I like the idea of giving people just one click to follow up locating a record of interest. One example of how I might use the table is to add a ""Textual criticism"" section to articles on NT books that don't have one already. I'd sort the table by the Contents field (I know it's not perfect), view the data relevant to a book and click through to it. Another use is to check just what 1 Corinthians chapters 10-11 contain. That article actually has links to specific chapters. Some of us know what's in chapters, most won't. Though, admittedly, not all articles on NT books go to specifics on chapters, but maybe in time they will. Now the work is done, it seems like a pity to lose it. Rest assured, I'm not going to be writing articles with every second word Wikified. ;) " +"undefined Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Monica L. Brown Hello, Miss Monica Brown! I'm . I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Monica L. Brown. You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monica L. Brown. (talk - contribs) " +" Yes, I see that now. I just don't understand why the article can't be named ""Milwaukee County Zoo"". P.S. Why do you disagree with the name ""Milwaukee County Zoo""? I've asked you that 1,000 times and you never responded!" +and info. Beginning to find my way around. +" Back in Business Ring a bell? This one I'm pretty sure is Reece, including the writing style. — · [ ChitChat ] " +semi-protect Where do I request Semi protectio on a page? +" Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. →.И " +Do not mistake this for a threat: this is an issue about names of articles on Wikipedia. Here the name of the article is Roman Catholic Church. If you don't like it campaign for it to be changed, but do not try to it by the back door. You are using automated software to change a name without consent, and that is vandalism. I am not threatening you, I am warning you that the moment you do that again you will be blocked. Fair warning. — +Elected Oregon Hello fellow WikiProject Oregon folks and entities. Thanks to those who helped out with improving Vera Katz and History of Oregon during the last Collaboration of the Week! As you may have noticed, we have changed the banners a bit, but not our dedication to everything Oregon! This week, in honor of the political process, we have: Current Oregon Senate members & Current Oregon House members. Hopefully by November we can have an article on every current member of the Oregon Legislature. So feel free to turn a red link blue or expand an existing article. Since it is an election year, there should be plenty of newspaper stories. Plus, the state archives has this site that allows you to go back and see when they started serving and district info, plus at a minimum show they were a state legislator from a WP:RS. And per WP:BIO, all state legislator's are notable so no need to worry about AFD. As always, to opt out, opt in, or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. +" You have no valid arguments regardless the definition of the word state by international law, because there is no such requirement. However, if you so insist, here is another source, International bodies charged with enforcing international law also recognize that de facto states are bound by it. See Appellants' Br. at 20-21. Most recently, the International Tribunal formed by the U.N. Security Council to prosecute humani- tarian law violations in the former Yugoslavia defined ""state"" to include de facto regimes as well as recognized governments State: A State Member or non-Member of the United Nations or a self-proclaimed entity de facto exercising governmental functions, whether recognized as a State or not. 1 " +" Please justify your edits When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled ""Edit summary"" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. " +Please use edit summaries Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low: Edit summary usage for N328KF: 27% for major edits and 23% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace. Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! +REDIRECT User talk:Rehno Lindeque +" Sockpuppetry case You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PUPPETMASTER for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. " +Bishonen: Hi, I am hahahihihoho. And I will put a source in the Bosnia and Herzegovina article where it says that 250 000 died. I will not delete the part where it says that 100 000 died. Is it a deal? +images would it be alright to upload a few (of my own) screenshots from the game? +" Poorly written Native American section I want to lay out the major problemsin terms of structure and clarityafflicting the Native American controversy paragraph. As I show below, this inept writing serves to obscure the controversy surrounding her claim to Native American ancestry, which was the most-covered issue in her 2012 Senate Campaign. Topic sentence Competently-written paragraphs have clear topic sentences that state the main point of the paragraph. The ""topic sentence"" of the current, incompetently written paragraph on the Native American controversy is as follows: ""In April 2012, the Boston Herald sparked a campaign controversy when it reported that Association of American Law Schools (AALS) directories from 1986 to 1995 listed Warren as a minority professor."" This topic sentence is unclear; a reader who reads it would not see what the controversy was about. Being listed as a minority is not controversial. The issue is that Warren 1) listed herself in a 2) minority-recruitment directory for law schools, on the basis of 3) undocumented claims to Native American ancestry. A competently written topic sentence would convey those three main points. Here is an example of such a topic sentence: ""In April 2012, the Boston Herald sparked a campaign controversy when it noted that Warren had listed herself in a directory of minority law professors, used by law schools for recruitment purposes, despite the fact that she lacked any documented minority ancestry."" That competently-written topic sentence states the controversy in a nutshell. I am willing to entertain any number of alternative topic sentences, including those that are unduly favorable to Warren. (I've given up on truly achieving NPOV for this article.) But I am not willing to abide unclear writing. 'native ancestry' The current paragraph states that Warren's ""opponent Scott Brown speculated that she had fabricated a native ancestry to gain advantage in employment."" At this point, the paragraph has not stated that she claimed to be Native American, so it is not clear what type of ancestry the term ""native ancestry"" refers to. I have tried to replace ""native ancestry"" with ""Native American ancestry,"" but have been repeatedly reverted. 'Brown attacked Warren's ancestry' The current paragraph states that Scott Brown issued attack ads that ""referred to Warren's ancestry."" Whether made out of incompetence or malice, this statement constitutes a BLP violation. The statement indicates that Brown attacked Warren because of her ancestry or race. In reality, he attacked her for (allegedly) lying about her race to get ahead in the employment market. " +Vandalism?? You call my changing the Apollo articles to read the facts for a few seconds vandalism huh you stupid crackwhore? Ya well the mere existence of those Neil Armstrong fairy tales and maniacs who are still deluding themselves into thinking shit like that could have actually occured in 1969 is the ultimate vandalism of human culture on this planet in general. I looked into this Apollo nonsense in greater detail than I would have liked to. To the extent of trying to correspond with NASA. There is no such thing as a Neil Armstrong or anybody else actually going to the moon anytime soon, nevermind the 60s. If you look carefully at these so-called TV broadcasts of those events they look as outrageously unrealistic and disgustingly fake as Ed Wood movies. But hey why listen to me when you can keep right on regurgitating your appaller space balonies and other lies. That's how science and wikipedia works. +"==Québécois vs. Canadian== Please note that the English Wikipedia does not have separate categories for or and the like. We have to use the categories that actually exist on Wikipedia, and cannot leave an article sitting in empty redlinks so regardless of your political views for or against Quebec sovereignty, a Québécois musician is still stuck being categorized as ""Canadian"" until such time as Quebec's political status actually changes to that of a fully independent country. Thanks. " +Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 198.163.53.11). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. When you edit pages: Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism. +I am Hipi Did somebody block me. Nevermind ChrisO and his clique hase dont thate. I am waiting when he is going to block himself like Milosheviq. +" I am doing ""TR"" now but I am doing it manually as it seems to many mistakes within the infoboxes. For example, Mut (District), Mersin had the official name as Mersin instead of Mut and it is a district not a town, so that needed to be changed. Therefore, I am going through each one instead of letting the bot do it. — " +I'm rubber your glue... I think that pretty well summarizes every response you and your clever wit come up with. Talk to you later after your next witless response, douche. +you are ugly too go exercise and also get a real job and a girlfriend. +Fuck with me again (an invitation) I reckon you need to chill the fuck out? Innit? +Super Junior-K.R.Y. Hello EuroCarGT Yes, I remove removed all content from Super Junior K.R.Y becouse exist other article with more content about this band. Super Junior-K.R.Y. PD: Sorry for my English, I am a peruvian and I know little English. +Maybe I misunderstand you, but the Times is a great source. Certainly we can use articles from them: definitely mainstream etc. We can use the CNA quotes, but if we would like to shore up the article against complaints, then we will avoid them wherever possible. There's plenty of other material to work with. +Yes, the page listing the complete overview of the society with all Purdue information should be protected. It gives a more complte historical view of the society. I appreciate the other person's interest in promoting what the society is today, but what it is today is only an expression of what it has become after its start up. It would be like ignoring that U of I once had an indian mascot just because now it recently doesn't. This is an encyclopedia, not a current group's web page. T.N.E already has that, and anyone can go there and learn what the values of the society are today. +":You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I'm not joking,"" Biden said. " +talk How can you ignore truth? I am a direct source of this and I have the information about Burke as an inside source. +No Problem Glad to do it. BTW, looking at the history, I'd say an update of the vandalism counter was in order. +" Discussing whether Ynetnews is a reliable source, and the preicse nature of a ""tabloid"", is really beside the point. The issue is - What do you want to use it as a source for? Dawkins mentioned ""the Jewish lobby"". A few people have predictably seized upon the opportunity to call him anti-semitic, regardless of the evidence. Sure, it's a news story for a few days. But we are dealing with an encyclopedia article here. Does this little incident add anything meaningful to an understanding of the subject of the article? Rather less than the fact that Dawkins was parodied on South Park, actually. " +A SCREW YOU!! U FUCKING HARRY POTTER FANS!!!! +You could say that music - in particular The Beatles - is a huge part of the novel. I'll have to reread it once I've finished The Wind Up Bird Chronicle and jot down some notes on the themes, so we can make this page even better. +" ""Collaborative effort"" was a reference to Wikipedia. And its meaning is just the opposite of ""Just go away and interfere somewhere else"". " +" I blame it on the Kenyan-centric bias we see daily on the main page. d –    talk  " +I was quoting you, you dumb bastard. You really don't understand ANYTHING +Knob Jockey== You Gay For Deleting Factory: The Musical == +Hi Matt, thanks for the link. No doubt AJD will turn up and start his POV edits, so I will watch it with interests. Note this info. ;) +2008 (UTC) School knowledge I take it due to your knowledge of buckinghamshire and Princes Risborough School, you are a member of it? thanks, No, I don't have any connection with the school. I found the house names on the school's website. ~ 14:19, 12 May +The simple answer is that there are hundreds of thousands of forums. Wikipedia is not a web directory, and does not list all of them. Our standards are at Wikipedia:Notability (web) but basically, a fan forum for one particular actress comes nowhere close. Notable forums have tens of thousands of members, and hundreds of thousands or millions of posts. +Stop being a Douchebag I have made positive contributions to Wikipedia. Don't be a dick and suggest that I should be blocked. That is unjust. +Um, you're confusing your terms with the technical thermodynamic meanings of the terms intensive and extenstive. Intrinsic and extrinsic are somewhat loosely defined terms of ordinary language. Don't use them when you really mean intensive and extensive. My revenge for your spelling pettiness ). +jezz - you people are really starting to look stupid now +The myth that Robert the Bruce offered safe haven to the Templars has also crept back in. In fact, the most that can truthfully be said about that is that Robert I perhaps didn't prosecute the Templars with a lot of vigor. All that business about hundreds of French Templars escaping to Scotland and assisting Robert the Bruce's armies, etc. is actually relatively modern mythology. The reality was that there was only a handful of Templars in Scotland at the time the Order was dissolved, and Robert I was not about to risk further papal censure by interfering. He intended all along to eventually get back into the church's good graces, and did so, being reinstated, with his excommunication being lifted, in 1328. 66.156.107.108 +" ""No. an unreliable source that agrees with other sources does not become reliable. never. never ever. sorry."" Perhaps I was not explaining my point in enough detail. The source is only there to confirm what the other four sources (provided at your demand) also corraborate. Therefore, the information being used for that source is reliable even though it does not necessarily meet your litmus test for what a reliable source is. That's my point as it was in the previous reference I gave for the Glock 18 interchangeability. That point is one you conceded and I'm using the same logic to refute your argument in this case as well. " +, 31 May 2006 (UTC) Oh, and I'm at a loss to understand what the bit about Victor Neuberg proves. Crowley was a bottom; he may have just been trying to inspire Neuberg to ride him move violently. - 22:42 +Yes, off course you can show us plus it is a good idea to check it before adding it to the article's body. I also agree to IndianBio and I think he'll do justice to the section. All the best. +Again, I note that my headline was not intended to indicate that tanks dominated ALL battlefields. I hope you are happier with the last suggestion. But you guys almost make it sound (at least here on the talk page) like it was more a hindrance than an advantage to have tanks! And I remain of the view that it was tanks that reintroduced flanking manoeuvres and deep thrusts into enemy hinterlands, not any other invention or tactical doctrine alone. +FUCK YOU WIKIPEIA YOU CANT STOP US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK +Why is it absurd? What is absurd is complaining about something and then asking someone else to remove it. +I just read it, and it's not apparent to me, so it's better not to mention it until it is explicitly stated. +Do NOT remove my edits. Do i make myself clear +" To further clarify, even though ""club team"" San Miguel-Philippines is composed of the exact same lineup as that of national team, Team Pilipinas (Philippines national basketball team), they are technically two different teams on paper. San Miguel-Philippines is supposed to be a club team coming from the Philippines (examples of club teams = San Miguel Beermen, Barangay Ginebra Kings etc.) They participate only in events like the FIBA Asia Champions Cup for Clubs (not FIBA Asia Championship for national teams) SEABA Champions Cup and other tournaments for clubs. Newspapers continue to refer to the national team as the SMC-RP (San Miguel-Philippines) squad, leading to some confusion. That is acutally ""the Philippine national team sponsored by San Miguel"", not the San Miguel-Philippines club team." +WV, standard practice is to ask a neutral party to do it for you. If you want to bring a report, go right ahead, I've already talked to 10 other users who are ready to discuss your disruptive and unproductive behavior, most you've crossed during the last few days. Again, heed WP:BOOMERANG. Post on my talk page againanything, and I will take it as harassment. +I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg +stop grinning u idiot. What I said waz true thus in the public interest. Not every comment has to be positive +User:EngineerScotty == I removed the deletion tag from on such edits and assume that the user simply forgot to log in before editing their user article. This isn't that uncommon. 04:57, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC) == +" This is what happens when you question the wisdom of wikipedia ... I note that the reverter and censorer ""halaqah' does not get penalized for abuse of editting WHich proves the point I was making. WIKIPEDIA where some animals are more equal than otehrs. SIGH" +1)TABthe troll like chasing because biased view was eliminated (lack of acceptance of truth and historical facts) in other article (namely “recovered Teritories) 2)TABCitizenship is as little important as worth is paper of a passport. It has nothing to do with intelligence, work and discoveries of an individual. In opposition the origin – genes and brain goes from the parents is not it ) (in fact the social environment is also important, for good and the bad result) In the case of JD he was bring up in Polish family and local Polish society. Inevitably the childhood is most influential period for development. I will not discuss the German environment and education just to avoid irritation of the troll(s). I am very sorry I disappoint you Lysy sense of compromise but I found such philosophy unpractical Best +and are willing to release the images under such a free license +had good experiences of +" On 19:57, 12 August 2012‎ you (86.150.65.44) made an edit with the edit title ""Revert unauthorised change to my comment by Wtshymanski"" Seven minutes later, on 20:04, 12 August 2012 you posted the above warning. Diff for your revert Your change consisted of changing a link. Wtshymanski had it as Request for Comment and your revert changed it to Request for Comment Request (Is that related to the Department of Redundancy Department?) Your full paragraph: ""It was not a personal attack but a statement of undisputed fact (and was not even disputed by you at the recent Request for Comment Request, whose outcome you still continue to ignore. The above two points underline the point admirably."" Your link goes to an RfC that was closed on with an outcome of ""no immediate administrative action appears required. However, I invite Wtshymanski to take the concerns voiced here under serious consideration. Administrative action may be requested if the conduct that has been the focus of this discussion continues."" When you say ""whose outcome you still continue to ignore"", that implies that he should respond at the link you posted. But he can't. It's closed and has had no comments for months. Furthermore, how can you know whether he is ignoring the advice to take something under serious consideration? The link Wtshymanski provided is where the active discussion is ongoing (last post a week ago at 16:54, 4 August 2012) and the place where one would reasonably expect Wtshymanski to respond. Thus I conclude not only that the edit was reasonable, but that Wtshymanski wants his critics to go to the right place. I am the first one to come down hard on Wtshymanski when he does something wrong, but only when it is clear that he has actually done something wrong. In my opinion this incident does not rise to that level. It is a debatable correction to a URL that should have been handled with WP:BRD instead of a user warning. Nobody ever made a ruling that WP:AGF does not apply to Wtshymanski. " +Matt Jenkins Matt Jenkins (2 March, 1995), currently resides in Tyabb. He dropped out of school and now works as a labourer. He is well known around the Mornington Peninsula, for his humorousand often childishantics. +Also referenced in a physics essay publication. +All links in the references are broken +" Quite a few of my edit were prior to Lancaster becoming involved in editing the page. Also the first block of my edits were when I was tasked with merging it with Actus et potentia. But it's Lancaster's rapid and escalating talk page demands that are much more of an issue than rapid edits to the article... I've had to spend an enormous amount of time responding to that talk page and to Talk:Energeia (one of the articles to be merged). Would it make any difference if I could prove he's made false and misleading statements in his ""charges""? But if that's not the sort of thing you usually look into, I don't want to impose. Should I open a WP:AN3 like he did? I've collected this list from Aug 20 where Lancaster has reversed actions of mine, in whole or in part. (That's not all, and that's just the 20th). Lancaster's deletion of most of what I've worked on in the article 18:46, 20 August 2010 My changes to the definitions in the lead from 0143, 20 August 2010: 18:35, 20 August 2010 My addition of modal logic to the lead from 0230, 20 August 2010: 18:35, 20 August 2010 My changes to §Actuality from 0110, 20 August 2010: 08:21, 20 August 2010 My addition of an OR tag from 0058, 20 August 2010 18:42, 20 August 2010 Please let me know if more instances or additional information on each would be helpful. Or anything that would help shed some light. Thank you.— " +" Also, about it being my turn to argue back and forth and back and forth and back and forth and back and forth and back and forth with you: You HAVE NOT presented one counter argument against the article revision of yours needing a cleanup/POV check. εαίδεια* " +" CALL FOR REVISION! As it stands this entry is not about ""Ukrainian Nationalism."" It simply provides a bad natinalist account of Ukrainian history. ""Nationalism"" is a theory that argues ethnic and political borders must coincide. An entry dealing with this must explain when this theory first arrived in Ukrainian lands, who were its proponents and opponents. It must list major theoretical works as well as describe how the ideas were disseminated. It must also deal with government reactions to attempts to ""nationalize"" the populace." +I didn't, you fucking piece of garbage. I hope you get shot in the face. +why I need provide a reliable source. I am Ukrainean and I know that Ukraine army right now 250,000 thousand. When yanukovcych was a president he destroyed Ukraine army and it was 50,000 thousand. +Wrong, inconsistent and out of date data The list seems to have wrong information. e.g. New York is listed as having 22 million whereas the United States metropolitan areaUnited States metropolitan area article, which links here, lists it at 18,323,002. This leads me to believe that there are more problems with this list. Mind you, such a lists must be maintained regularly to be of any value..... +" Also known as a WikiJaguar. (As for the question, I have no idea. You would be better off talking to an editor that is more heavily involved in copyright issues, such as . She should be able to help you or point you in the right direction to finding an answer.) serenC " +Shotokan Dispute Feb thru Apr 2006 (Original Message:) Howdy. I have been asked to look at some issues regarding edits as related to a content dispute with (Reply:) I could forward you the email message with complete header. Could you give me some email address of yours to use? ...or please specify a method of proof that I could supply. Regards, +"Atom you don't believe actual photos of masturbation is sexually explicit photos. I am sorry to say they are sexually explicit and so you said yourself that the disclaimer is used for that purpose. Also, Wikipedia itself is targeted for minors. In addition, you say that Wikipedia does not have child pornography photos. I do believe there is a photo of a real prepubescent child nude (not an illustration) that is in bondage with the title ""Virgin Killer"". Which recently Wikipedia archived so no more comments could be made. 211.220.23.15 " +Facts Anna Frumina is one of many names used by this puppymill. She has many alias. In the state of PA animal abuse is classified as a Summary Offenses: These animal violations of the Pennsylvania State Cruelty Laws are classified as Summary Offenses. Among the scale of crimes, summary offenses are considered the least serious and therefore are tried or heard in courts of District Justices of the Peace. Thus it will NOT be found in a ONLINE criminal background check. LEVEL I Cruel ill treatment, over-loading, beating, or otherwise abusing ANY animal. LEVEL I Cruel ill treatment, over-loading, beating, or otherwise abusing ANY animal. Neglecting any animal under the offender's care (whether he owns the animal or not). Abandoning or attempting to abandon any animal. Depriving any animals of food, water, shelter or necessary veterinary care. Depriving any animal of access to clean shelter sufficient to keep it dry, protect it from bad weather and be adequate to preserve its own body heat. +Latinos If you want a hint of what the human race might look like in another millenium, I think looking at latinos might give you a little sneak preview. As Latino isn't a race and alot of Latinos are multiracial. +Hi Hello Ezhiki. Can you add mk: in the languages box on the main page, too? Thanks, +I'VE SAID ONCE AND I WILL SAY IT AGAIN Mathewignash is a lover of mediocrity that why he's vehemently defended keeping so many poor Transformers I and other users have nominated for AFD. +" Hindu Vandal YOu are a confirment Upper caste hindu vandal. Morally corrupt as you are; you must be a Bhramin. You are a Confirmed sock puppeteer. You have been going around with another user name ""Netaji"" " +You're right. I did extensive online research about Lagos, and it really shouldn't be on the list, either. Regardless, London should stand; there is no longer any real debate about that. +|declined=Exactly, we blocked you to prevent you from vandalizing. Your previous two accounts were vandalism-only, and we have no reason to believe that this one will be any different. +Event-related potential • Wikipedia: +" It's OK, we've resolved it and found a solution. Nick will post edit requests so that other members can use the source instead. A bit like an insider giving the scoop so that we can be as near-accurate with the article as possible. If that makes sense? Mᴥuse " +" ""the alien"" theory of economic development argument? That is just silly. The book does not claim to be a reply to any theories about alien influencing economic development; the book does claim to be a reply to intelligence theories regarding economic development. " +Wikipedia is a source of information on a huge range of issues and topics, many of which do not get an airing in conventional references; it is particularly useful in providing details on obscure flags across the planet that are not often featured in standard works. Included in Wikipedia’s annals are the flags for example, of Khuzestani Arabs, ethnic Somalis in Kenya, the Bakonjo of Uganda, the Turks of western Thrace – some decidedly obscure banners but I am grateful to Wikipedia contributors for providing information on these myriad groups which allows me to know exactly whom these designs represent and understand the context when I see them aloft on news reports and elsewhere. Why therefore are we to be denied similar access to information concerning the extant flag in the English county of Dorset? The fact is that a gold flag with a red edged white cross, designated the “Dorset Cross”, can be seen flying across the county; it is also a fact that the town council in the Dorset town of Wimborne has embraced this as their preferred county flag. The design is therefore a tangible reality, that has evident popularity and the full support of a local authority, what factor in these circumstances makes the Dorset Cross ineligible for inclusion in Wikipedia? One might argue that the Dorset Cross is not an official flag - how many of the examples cited above can claim to be official? The four snakes and cross flag depicted in the entry on Martinique in fact specifically states that this is an “unofficial region flag” however, one presumes that it actually flies in the island i.e. it exists and is possessed of a certain popularity and is therefore worthy of note. How does the circumstance in Dorset differ? As in Martinique, the Dorset Cross flag is not official; as in Martinque, the flag can be seen flying in many places, how is this flag then not worthy of mention or depiction in Wikipedia? A trawl across the internet reveals that there are two flags currently commercially available as Dorset flags – one is a banner of the arms of the County Council, which design the general public is not legally entitled to fly, the other is the Dorset Cross, which the public demonstrably are flying but this reality is not being reflected in Wikipedia, where we currently have an illustration of the banner of the arms but none of the Dorset Cross – this strikes me as imbalanced and tendentious. The Dorset Cross is a contender in a current competition held under the auspices of the Dorset County Council to select a flag that they will themselves endorse. The competition itself is of course worthy of mention and when all the contenders are revealed they should of course all appear in Wikipedia but the fact is that notwithstanding said competition, the Dorset Cross is already flying and predates the competition and Wikipedia, in not allowing its depiction is guilty of misinformation. One relies on Wikipedia to advise that the flag of the Dinka is a five striped horizontal design and takes such advice on good faith; how odd therefore that one should not be similarly able to consult this resource on a flag that one can see flying in the streets and all about.User:Vexilo +October 2008 (UTC) I'm presty sure that this is comming to 360 also. Tekken is going to be like DVM4(Devil may cry 4). 04:15, 13 +English is not my native language. Unfortunately in my country English even is not third language so far. +Lol Lol. You're funny. +Oh, and I guess the few thousand words you put into Extreme Rules (2012) were good too. Whatever. +Ping You got e-mail. +joshbuddy, your editing leaves me gasping! Your Lead-in is not only void of verification; it also presents several outright false statements, and seriously misrepresents other items. 1. The statement that “Jehovah's Witnesses teach that blood is sacred and must not be eaten or transfused whole” is grossly misleading because all Jehovah’s Witnesses do not teaching this and your statement implies all of them do. Hence this statement of yours misrepresents. 2. The statement “This view was put forward by the second president of the Watchtower Joseph Franklin Rutherford” not only lacks verification, it is just plain false. Rutherford did not teach that blood per se was sacred, and he never condemned blood transfusion. 3. The statement “Beginning in 1980, the medical use of certain products derived from blood became permissible” is not verified, and it is just plain false. Watchtower doctrine tolerated some products derived from blood as early as November of 1961, which was only ten months after blood transfusion became a shunning offence. 4. The statement “there is evidence that some Jehovah's Witnesses have secretly taken medical products derived from blood or blood transfusions” is a patent misrepresentation. Verifiable source material demonstrates that some Jehovah’s Witnesses have also openly accepted blood transfusion! 5. The statement, “The non-acceptance of blood products by groups like the Jehovah's Witnesses has caused many hospitals to offer bloodless medicine” is another horrible misconstruction. When it comes to the Watchtower organization’s blood doctrine, there is no other similar group, and you have not referenced one either. Your statement manifests a serious lack of qualification to address this subject. You manifest ignorance of the subject, and a willingness to edit despite that lack. Hence I have reverted to the verified introduction, which feeds nicely into the article as a whole. You have yet to answer questions asked of you in relation to the verified Lead-in language, will you ever? +how can i convince you that i am actually sorry? +Simpsons cast members Please stop removing my edits (Cloris Leachman, Larry King, etc regarding Simpsons cast members. Look at the history page for C. Leachman and the CfD . Note that all other TV shows/film categories have been renamed to cast members to include all guest/one-off actors. +" ""please refrain from your islamofascist garbage. the article on BNF has nothing to do with BJP. if you have any constructive ideas you are welcome to add them. insha allah soon pakistan will be 5 countries.Wikireader41 (talk) "" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir_conflict&diff;=prev&oldid;=261614931 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir_conflict&diff;=prev&oldid;=261613960 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir_conflict&diff;=prev&oldid;=261612224 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir_conflict&diff;=prev&oldid;=261610564 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir_conflict&diff;=prev&oldid;=261583896 All these comments are a racist and islamophobic he didnt even get punished for them He is also provoking me by calling pakistani people terrorists so i wont stop unless he is blocked 86.151.123.189 " +Thank you Thank you for the rollback. I don't think that admin knew what he was doing. 63.226.104.225 +TF is always first, and very often wrong. But, it is used here far more than any other source. And, as a result, this article has contained a great deal of nonsense. The only reason TF is considered RS is that there aren't any other sources. So, WP uses secondhand anonynous sources and somehow feels comfortable that it's doing its job according to its rules. +" Your revert Hello. I would like to kindly request reconsideration of your revert (see link above). I had reinstated an edit removed based on a misunderstanding of a previous editor. The other IP user had replaced somebody else's comment with his own, and, when I attempted to take care of it, somebody had already reverted the edit, resulting in the old comment being restored and the new comment, which the IP editor posted (and removed the other comment in the process) being removed. Please browse the diffs starting from here. In my opinion, the edit was made in good faith. I restored the comment. The editor appeared to be legitimately inquiring about a deletion or revert. I reposted and signed it. I had noticed that you have reverted my edit. Please note that I have not at all made my edit in bad faith, and that I have never made bad faith edits to Wikipedia. I have been editing since 2008, had an account, but do not use it anymore since I am quite retired. I had a clean record and had never been blocked from editing. I do not know if it is possible to have those entries removed from the block log, since blocks count against an editor's reputation and I have not made any bad faith edits. Please let me know if you have any further questions regarding this incident. Thanks in advance. 69.155.128.40 " +While English language sources are preferred, non-English sources are also acceptable. However, per WP:NONENG, please provide a quotation from the sources you've listed, along with an English translation, that backs up the content you've added. +" D dogging A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article D dogging, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. (Talk, ) " +" The information about the IBM 5100 was likely very obscure public knowledge, as opposed to being an outright secret. I've seen it mentioned that only a ""few dozen"" people in the world would have known about this specific bit of knowledge. But I can't find where I read that. " +Oh just fuck you! when I get unblocked your ganna see some shyt, cuz I'm commin' foe you, and don't lye this is cuz I'm black, I'd get the police involved if I wasn't a nigger, you better unblock me now If you whant me ta stop being so black, +Hey baby Chill dem jets of fire babe +Did you even read what I said he's trying to bully me. I tell what he actually did. He left a comment on my article, something which he doesn't even have any knowledge about and I don't think he's even taken a look at the article. This way he tries to annoy me. The same way he did on Castlevania. He knows I get angered quickly and he's taking advantage of that. He talked in such a way which won't seem offensive at all to you but would be clearly offensive to me. And as I earlier said I personally attacked him because he was threatning to block me for a simple mistake without even informing me. Doesn't that clearly tell he's a bully. +": on that point I said above: ""there are conflicting theories, you believe etc. while this source says"". " +disruptive editing i wasn't being disruptive i stated that he wasn't admin of wiki +I reworded that bit to hopefully be better in line with the perceived logical inconsistency you pointed out. +you're wasting your time biatch you know i'll be back again and again and again with a different IP adress +Review Isn't it a bit unfair to have the one review on here be a negative one? +Do not change what I edit. I did not vandalize anything. I spoke truth. Kiss my furry Pagan Ass. +"==FIVEaa== Hi there. I notice you are rebranding everything from 5AA to FIVEaa, which whilst it seems somewhat trivial, I suppose it is appropriate considering their website only mentions FIVEaa. To make it easier for you to find pages that link to 5AA/FIVEaa, simply go to it (FIVEaa on wikipedia) and then click on ""what links here"" on the left. For instance, I can see that Mark Aiston still has 5AA. Hope that helps you. " +Ok, I will. (At least, I'll try) Thanks again. +Quadell's Sham Nomination There is a growing concensus that Quadell should not become a bureaucrat! You can flip your vote here you know! +, 21 September 2011 (UTC) Anyone who can be bothered to read the article will find the map useful and easy to understand. Some who cannot be bothered to read the article, would find the map less than ideally useful, especially if they do not speak Russian. 19:51 +You looked the Sparrow Mass. What do think of this? I am not involved (but was the one to suggest to address Classical, instead of an obscure article talk such as Intermezzo.) A precious friend is. He may have worded so politely that the problem possibly isn't obvious (?), but the talk pages carry already long discussions. +Yes, whereas, refusing to unblock him on the suspicion that he will continue to move war is AGF. He should've been unblocked a few hours later (and after a talking-to), and if he continued to move war (doubtful), reblocked. Blocking him for 2 days right from the start incomprehensible. — lfdder +Ttistsw! I think you only see what you like to see. I wonder where are you dropping from in this logical discussion. +Meetup Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa You're invited! +I will certainly do so. When I review an article, I check all sourcing, etc., so it will take a day or two, but I am working on it now. +Still havent grown up I see. You are so pathetic...u werent quick enough as it got mirrored on another site. +But this is my page, I should be allowed to do what I want with it. 15:38, 8 June 2006 +Tell me, are you a bot? +" So Excited I was wondering why ""So Excited"" was removed from Khia's singles section, she's in the video, and I've seen the promo single and it says Janet f/ Khia. I think this should count as one of hers... " +Image requested|in=Canada|business & economic topics +Thanks. I'm looking forward to reading your reply. +the phrase in europe it is refered to as white spirit was especially helpful for me... it let me know that white spirit and mineral spirits are the same +Bradford City I am removing unreferanced content. +Indeed this is the case… confusing that nobody could repeat Kleist's experiment. +Hackney, you are really vandalizing these pages by removing a valid category. You have given no reason why a category a person qualifies for should not be in it. This is not how it is done anywhere else on Wikipedia. Everyone is in the categories that apply to them whether or not they are notable for it. The fact is Bobby Sands is very notable for being a Catholic. You want to deny this fact for no other reason that your hatred for Bobby Sands and your bigotry towards the Irish. +I have made the first two changes that you mantioned. I can make the final change if you detail how you would like it formatted, I am not sure how to write it or where to put it from your request. +Out of curiosity, Gamaliel, did you specify any end-date for this personal grudge banning, or is it until I abase myself before you? 'Cause that isn't gonna happen. - +" UNBLOCK REQUESTED Sobering Finding from Electronic Communication Harassment Observation (ECHO)50% of people subjected to On-line abuse-harrasmnt suffer PTSD related symptomatology.This is stated and the sources provided to ensure that editor or admin has that fact in mind as they read details of abuse and bullying here in Wiki laid out below.''' Also Meet AndyTheGrumpyVandal - 07:07, January 25, 2013 and [- Quite detailed concerns about his established patterns of abuse - including Homophobia, Transphobia and long term established history of personal attacks and blocks] Could this Highly Questionable Block kindly be reviewed in light of the ongoing WP:DRAMA and history of DRAMA that the editor has been linked to. 1.) His activity at ANI in making misleading claims about BLP Violation which he shared blame for whilst he used it to attack anther editor. Diffs 1 - Smokes Screens Do Not Aide Clarity Or Reality 2 - Not Answering the Questions and Blowing More Smoke does not work ! Kindly address the direct questions already asked. 3 - Again I advise that you stop blowing smoke and moderate your tone and language about others. It's making you look bad. 4 - I see that you have 2nd time stated I have accused you of taking Drugs. Can I have a reference to show me when and how. Other readers are interested too! 5 - Again - Kindly stop your misconduct and refrain from behaviour which is Bullying and Harassing. It is interesting that in asking for much misconduct - misdirection - mendacity and twisting of wiki I am supposedly derailing in the view of ? It is fascinating that he kept expanding the ANI entries under the heading [ A gross breach of WP:BLP at the 'Derby sex gang' article.] - To which he has added FOUR Subheadings and flooded the whole subject with yet more layers of misdirection, false and constructed claims all of which waste time and effort in having to address - and please not It Is NOt Possible To Prove The Negative. So he keeps adding to his misdirection - attempt to hide the questions of his failed conduct and confuse readers who were unwary of his patterns of misconduct - or even empower sympathetic ones to cherry pick. YET more Smoke An Mirrors. He evidently loves the attention it gains him. I fear that has been happily misdirected by the ongoing misuse and manipulation of Wiki systems and content by - as has also been revealed as part of his BLOCK which is featuring on ANI. I think that it needs to be reassessed - especially as the editor has been focusing upon the ongoing claims of under only a subheading created to claim that my responses and requests above were derailing so as to further 's pattern of misdirection and attack upon editors who are not gulled or beguiled by his (now revealed) well developed antics. I remain concerned that manipulation of content in this way is yet again being used to cause editors(Especially Admns) to see what Manipulators wish and not the bigger picture. It is a known pattern of exploitation of person/interface in the areas of Cyber Abuse-Harrassmnt-Bulying, and indicates that unwary editors(Especially Admns) are being made agents of the abusers. I also note that has been happy to state his intent to vandalise - his seeking to support around mental health after he has been bocked (Feigned Victimhood - 3rd stage of serial bully defence - [http://www.bullyonline.or +from PMID 23512950, Harrow 2013 +I have to agree with you, FWIW. The problem ultimately is that the speaker cone has mass and therefore inertia. Even if you could short circuit the coil, there is still the mechanics to consider. +I wannabe in you fanmail! Again! 80.99.29.195 +Italicized a few things Lawrlafo, I just read your new page on Aravind Enrique Adyanthaya. It is highy polished, very professional for a newly-created page! I italicized a number of the written works I did it all in one edit, so you can undo all of it in one stroke if you wish. Great job, Lawrlafo. +" Capitalization of ""bus"" in gallery Hi. Is there a reason why the word ""bus"" is capitalized so much in the gallery? I feel that Too Many Capitals Make Wikipedia Look Like a Victorian Concert Programme, and that it probably breaks the WP:MOS. I don't want to go off on a wild campaign against them without the opportunity for discussing it, but I'm honestly having difficulty understanding why the caps are there. Thanks and best wishes " +Problematic new entries A number of older cannon has been added over the years in the categories stone balls and iron balls and shot whose caliber has not been sourced, namely Malik-i-Maidan, Jaivana, Dalmadal/Dala Mardana and Zamzama. Another entry, the Basilic (cannon), is sourced, but the value seems more of a modern guesstimate, less the result of reliable historical documentation or modern measurements. I am of the view that the former pieces should be removed from the list until reliable, scholarly sources can be put forward, while the latter is debatable for its inevitable vagueness. +" Lady, I don't know the reason, but my guess is that it's because people using screen readers need to be able to navigate through an article easily via the table of contents. Drmies, based on my guess, I'd say yes, in general, the next smaller heading level would be correct. In this specific instance I'd say it doesn't matter much.  • XAЯAbИAM " +If it is not on the internet, it doesn't exist Seriously, though, being web-based is not a measure of non-notability. What's needed is a measure of how broadly something is used (on the web or not). If the symbol is just identified by a single person enterprise on a series of closely-related websites (which may be the case) it isn't notable. If a number of independent groups use it, it's a different story. Basically, can someone come up with at least two usages that is not a) A website maintained by Per Bylund or b) a wikipedia mirror? +You are not entitled to claim on your own authority that something is documented on film, then add that claim to the article without a reference. Especially not a criminal allegation. And especially not regarding a living person. Even if the claim is correct there's the question of weight and appropriateness for the article, which is about the band, and not one article. I suggest you find judicious, reliable sources, and make a neutral statement in the article. Until then, unreferenced claims violating WP:BLP can be removed summarily. And if you continue to edit war you can be reported to both the WP:AN3 and BLP notice boards. +Thank you for your answer. But I disagree with you over the-long-standing-version argument. Is it backed by an official policy? And even if we take that policy, this version was there for nearly a month. +Get a job You should be blocked from this site. You must be a 1st year undergraduate with all the moralizing. Gee, get yourself a girlfriend. +Thank you for experimenting with the page Katharine McPhee on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. work +" Nuremberg I read in a history book that Goring had ""smiled and appeared bored"" while watching footage of the Holocaust the trials, and that he his ""jokes about the Holocaust and lack of remorse horrified judges"". I don't see this in the article. There is very little about Nuremberg in this article.66.177.73.86 " +As I suggested, with your frame of mind as regards this article I would if I was you simply take it off your watchlist and then it won''''t bother you anymore. Please don't turn what is a silly little article into a battlefield, I assure you it is not worth it. +You have started a war you can't win. Bring +" MGMT90018 Turnover Dear lecturer, I didn't create the part ""Potential benefits about employee turnover"". It is done by somebody else. " +HighBeam access, email needed Hi, we tried to send you your HighBeam access code but you don't have email enabled. Could you email me at wikiocaasiyahoo.com so I can send you your code? Thanks and cheers, t | c +" Image copyright problem with Image:NewSlaveNation-New Slave Nation.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:NewSlaveNation-New Slave Nation.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. (T/C) " +Saudia Arabia Thanks for your note. I've done some more. +" Tesla stuff Notice how all those ""ugly American"" comments are merely part of Irismeister's rant. " +I am a gigantic faggot +" June 2014 Because of WP:OUTING I will not say who you were impersonating, but I can't see why someone with good intentions would deliberately impersonate another editor, so I'm hard-blocking you. ''''''頭 " +", and Welcome to Wikipedia! Hello there , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Feel free to post questions on my talk page - I'm happy to help you with anything you need. If you need help (which I can’t answer), put {{helpme}} on your talk page. It is also a good idea to explain what your problem on Wikipedia is, it helps you and your helper! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If another Wikipedian criticizes what you have done check what Wikipedia is not to avoid this happening again/ever. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. TAB Help Here are a few good links for newcomers: If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia manual of style naming conventions Simplified Ruleset How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial Wikipedia:Boot Camp, where in addition to standard posts, you can use an IRC to chat online with fellow Wikipedians willing to help! How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Wikipedia Glossary Wikipedia:Help - ask for general help in editing Wikipedia here Village Pump - here you can post technical questions about Wikipedia's operation Reference Desk - where you can get help locating articles or factual information Tutorial - a nice tutorial for beginners Policy Library - a overview of Wikipedia Policies Wikipedia:Cheatsheet - a great way to remember the Wikipedia language. Want to do something? Additional tips Here are some extra tips to help you get around in Wikipedia: If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.TAB You can sign your name using four tildes (~). If your keyboard doesn't have tildes (or for whatever reason) you can also click the button on the bar above the editing section. Good luck editing, and remember, if you have a problem, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. " +It's not for me to comment on your stupidity, but I think you should ask this of Rushikesh.tilak (who is the contributing editor) especially since he wrongly stated as fact that AAP's demand was supported by other political parties. I put it to him it was the other way around since AAP was supporting the BJP's demand for CAG audit. The 2010 High Court decision was in the Petition of Nand Kishore Garg (a BJP Councillor). Jayant Bhushan was for the intervenor (AAP's) Prashant Bhushan in WP(C) 4821/2010. The case is decided, and the present legally settled position is on the Discom's website (link given earlier) as follows:- Shri Prashant Bhushan was also party to this and the issue has been conclusively settled by the Hon’ble court, vide its judgment on May 23, 2011. 8. CAG Issue Response At present the CAG has no authority to audit the accounts of private companies in view of the clear provisions contained under Article 149 of the Constitution of India. The various provisions of the CAG Act, 1971, clearly set out the duties and powers of the CAG are with respect to audit of accounts of Union States and Government Companies / Corporations. These powers do not extend to private companies. Subsequent to transfer of management control to discoms in 2002, CAG categorically confirmed stating that from July 1, 2002, discoms are not government companies under Section 617 of the companies Act, 1956. DERC itself, in its tariff order of 28.05.09, had observed that the private discoms being a company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, presently there is no such provision of CAG audit in respect to private companies. So WP:NPOV would require a balanced picture with all of the above incorporated. +Just to add. I had a quick look at your user page and I can see you're a very busy individual. I am sorry that I've encroached on your time like this and I will bear that in mind in future. I think it's admirable you spare the time as you do to further Wikipedia. +Albanians against the Ottomans I have read here and also heard from many people that the albanians were also fighting against the ottomans. In the belligerents you should add albania. Many orthodox albanians were forced to flee or convert to be muslim and it is important that you clarify this in the article. http://www.albanian.com/v4/showthread.php?t=8470 An anti-Ottoman coalition of Hungarians, Bulgarians, Romanians, Poles, Serbs and ALBANIANS headed by the Serbian prince Lazar fought a Turkish army twice its size on the plain of Kosova near Pristine on 15 June 1389. Troops of Gjergj II Balsha of Shkodra and of Theodore Korona Muzaka of Berat participated. Even though an Albanian named Milosh Kopiliq penetrated to the Sultan’s tent and assassinated Amurat I, the Turks succeeded in destroying the Balkan coalition. +Alfred Fincher Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Alfred Fincher, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! +ATTENTION: owners of this site You may want to take mod rights away from this guy, he is abusing his powers by reverting several factual edits all over the site. +reply to your reply - Here is is the link for the english revsion of his name I would appriciate if you would alter the artice yourself as I do not want this to become an edit war. If you look at Shyam's current recommendations with regards the use of Volunteer in relation to articles about the various IRA's. I will also find a link for him getting shot in his bed. +New Forum I am not going to available on here as often with the upkeep of my new forum! +Yes, the visually disabled have the ability to enlarge (if they are still sighted) or reduce (if they are blind and using a reader), the images by their preferences. However, any manual sizing of images, such as reducing them to 175px, overrides the use of the user preferences. The technical details are in the image use policy. +Notification of discretionary sanctions: homeopathy and pseudoscience (talk) +Re: John Bull (locomotive) suggestion I've shortened the intro to remove some of the detail that is in the main History section. I still think it could be better worded, but I don't want to take out too much. Thank you for your comment of semi-support. B-) 02:01, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC) +Wrong decision You have atlast removed the picture ShaikhChandScan.jpg. for some silly reasons. I guess a responsible administrator should first get to the roots and then take a decision. It was a harsh and hasty decision. When no one from Wikipedia:India objects to the image, who are you to object and remove the picture. Kindly restore it or let the administrators from Wikipedia:India decide about the fate of the picture. Cheers +Your wikipedia id is 'Mapletip', so use it! You are afraid people will realise your hidden agendas? D +If you feel that any portion of the article may not be neutral, please let me know. (Sorry for writing such long notes.) +That statement is almost entirely wrong, from top to bottom. No, from a policy standpoint, it is not worse except for biographies of living persons; countries are not living people, cannot be libelled, hence the invention of the template, which you chose not to use (hence it being destructive). I've added references for a handful of select nations because they are the ones that joined after independence. Almost all the rest joined at independence, so it is academic to show their join date. I have added information above and beyond what is on the Commonwealth Secretariat's site because said site is not a repository for all the information in the world on the Commonweath; are we saving space s that the inane 'continent' field can be included? The last point, that the opinion of a single user constitutes a consensus, is a bizarre misinterpretation of Wikipedia policy - yet again. I will also, finally, suggest that you (a) make better use of edit summaries, rather than claiming that deletion of what took me a long time to create in the first place is 'cleaning up'; and (b) read my edit summary before inferring that I intended to hurt your poor feelings - 'destructive' does not mean 'evil', but that some information has been lost, which was NOT conveyed in your obfuscatory edit summary. +Oi why did you delete my comment??? +That 2012 diff says exactly what Israeli rabbis and scholars said at the time and later here and here p.42-43. Please don't rewrite 'Jews' over 'IDF'. There is no intrinsic link between those two categories. Why are you persistently raking up my past (2012)? On second thoughts, forget it. That's all I have to say against your repetitious campaigning here and the use of old diffs out of context to insinuate things. +" Have a cupcake! since you have no friends or life award! Wow you must live a very sad loney life. I guess if i had no friend or anyone that cared about me I would spend all my time pretending like a know it all with a stick in my butt as i ride my high horse. So here is a cupcake you fruitloop diggus! Go ban me and change another article to whatever you what it to say so you feel like you have some power in the world, cause god knows it must suck to be you. p.s. stop trying to pick up little boys on the internet im telling chris hanson! " +Wikipedia has a number of policies and guidelines. A policy is an important principle that must be followed while creating articles, while a guideline is just a loose rule that a lot of editors agree with. Check out Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset for some of the policies and other important stuff. +User:Cush I'm not sure how this works. I called someone an inappropriate name on my user page, and you blocked me for 24 hours. So I was wondering whether this might also be grounds for some sort of discipline. Thanks. - +" Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) regarding sources for medical articles. The section ""Searching for sources"" gives advice for searching PubMed for reviews on the topic. There may also be recent academic textbooks that cover the topic (perhaps just a chapter). Also see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles. The section ""Citing medical sources"" links to an online tool that makes it easy to generate citation templates given just the PubMed ID of the paper. A full citation makes it much easier for folk to identify the paper and access it. You should be looking for reviews or chapters in professional textbooks ideally from the last 5 years and almost certainly not before 2000 unless the work is still regarded as relevant today (i.e. cited in recent publications). Be very wary of using primary research papers as sources because there is a risk you will be relying too much on your own interpretation rather than that of others (which is called original research on Wikipedia and although desirable in academia, is not desirable on Wikipedia). Cheers, °Talk " +" Lincoln and Interstellar You removed my proposals for deletion for both upcoming Spielberg films. The template indicated, ""To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page."" Since you did not do this in the edit summaries, do you mind explaining on the films' respective talk pages why these should not be deleted? There is very little existing information about these films as of late, as opposed to some other upcoming film articles. If your argument is not sufficient, I will promote these articles for deletion. " +" please note the edits of ankhmorpork. he is linking certain crimes with certain racial groups. utter distgusting. " +"Hello, ! Thank you so much for taking part in the Universitas21 workshop. Now that you've learned the basics, I hope that you'll stay logged in and have a go at editing some articles. If you're not feeling bold enough to write an article straight away, why not try a small edit first, or adding a link? Don't worry about being perfect, Wiki is a constantly evolving entity. Fortunately there's a whole team of editors just like you who can help. ]] You can't break Wikipedia, but in case you're still nervous here are some pages that you might find helpful: Is your topic notable enough for an article? Be Bold! Don't let grumpy users scare you off. Learn from others How to write a great article A simplified manual of style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Remember, if you are writing on a talk page, please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. See you soon! Scot-Wiki mailing list To keep up to date about Wikimedia events happening throughout Scotland, to learn more about ScotWiki projects, or to publicise your own ScotWiki event or project, join the ScotWiki Mailing List! " +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hit Me Up " +Thank you for experimenting with the page Magi on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +Taylor Swift I deleted that picture because it was on her page twice with the exact same caption and everything. So maybe we should just have one copy of it on her page? Sorry, next time I'll put that in the summary.... +" Wikipedia Day Celebration and Mini-Conference in NYC Saturday Feb 23 "" thing at one of our earlier NYC Wiki-Conferences.]] You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 12th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Saturday February 23, 2013 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here, or at bit.ly/wikidaynyu. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the ""open space"" experience! " +" It was very constructive you are just very very stupid. ARKJEDI10 " +like other rpg gamers +Oh well, in that case, you leave my edits alone you... lol, I'm just kidding P D lol. Happy editing! +Welcome! Hello, 68.30.40.110, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! +" Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (T | C | k) " +" Your Uncivil Friends Refuted Or were you saying something to the over 300 people who've downloaded this refutation of you're lies?: http://www.mininova.org/tor/1264745 And so that everyone can see part of it here: JoshuaZ said: ""Starfire, as I tried to explain to you Wikipedia cares about reliable sources and verifiability, not truth. Now, if you read that guideline, you may understand why in general AIG and many of the other sources you used are not reliable sources."" Hey JoshuaZ the liar, where does Wikipedia's policy say that AnswersInGensis.org is not a reliable source? Where JoshuaZ the vandal and liar? Show us. So you think saying, ""Now"" is scientific evidence that you are a wise and intelligent teller of the truth or that you know what a reliable and verifiable source is? JoshuaZ, where does Wikipedia's policy say that the Jacob Sheep Association = a reliable and verifiable source that Jacob Sheep are biologically primitive you hypocrite? Explain that hypocrite who personally attacked Starfire777 using lies. Show your references JoshuaZ. Saying, ""Now"" is not a reference that your accusations are true are they? Why can't you make sense Joshua? Again, where did those verses prophecy anything? Do these look like prophecies JoshuaZ?: Joshua also said: ""In this case, they did have sources, so you have even less of an argument."" Wrong JoshuaZ. Simply citing sources as you yourself said does not make the source valid. It must be substantiated and verifiable. Why do you conveniently forget that you smug babbling hypocrite? Your later comments don't merit much of a response, but I wThen he said: ""ill simply note that accusing people of bigotry, bias, hypocrisy, irrationality and trolling makes my earlier comment about not using ""Darwinist"" as a slur somewhat irrelevant;"" Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you said is true is true because you said so. So much for references eh? All you have to do is accuse and it makes you right, right hypocrite? See how you go round and round in circles using circular reasoning? ""if your earlier comment toed the line, the one above crosses it."" Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you say is true because you said so. Science! ""I suggest you calm down"" I suggest you not use sarcastic insults like that, ok hypocrite? You're implying that the Starfire777 is ill-tempered merely because he points out that you are hypocrite and uses logic to do so (as well as verifiable references on Answersingenesis.com which you lied about not being reliable and being against Wikipedia's rules to cite), ok liar? I suggest you also not command a Christian to follow your moral standards over Christ's, over God's. He is a Christian don't ya know? Are you now God to tell him how to feel and think? I suggest you read this verse and take it to heart which millions of Christians know very well so that you learn how not to offend them again: ""Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil."" - Ephesians 4:26-27 Last time I checked JoshuaZ, neither your nor Wikipedia's rules superceded God's. ""and read the relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines while you wait for your block to expire."" Oh the old ""you need to read it but I don't"" and ""you sit and think while your grounded young man"" insults. What an arrogant, childish hypocrite you are. I suggest that you stop pretending that whatever you say is true merely because you said it, and again, learn what Starfire777 properly told you to learn. I'll enhance the list for you: Reference, evidence, truth, reality, lie, bigot, hypocrite, fallacy, circular reasoning, troll, stalking, harassment, insults, hatred, and love. And Joshua also said: ""This is in addition to issues of original research in regard to Biblical prophecies and other issues on the Charles Darwin page."" Wow you sure like to weasel-word: ""other issues""? What are you references for this vague ""other issues"" JoshuaZ the Policy Master of Wikpedia? And Joshua, who said anything about prophecies? Where did Starfire777 say anothing about prophecies? No JoshuaZ the wannabe scholar, he said ""predicted"" in the same way that science can be used to predict the outcome of an experiment. If your lazy-brained truth-careless self had been paying attention to what he said CARE FULL Y you might have noticed that the verses were using PAST TENSE JOSHUA, not FUTURE TENSE JOSHUA. If you are unable to tell the difference between past tense and future tense, what business do you have playing judge? If y +" Warning Please note that you have repeatedly defied consensus, edit warred, and demonstrated problems with article ownership and single-purpose editing on the page Mikel Ljungman. Further edits that continue this pattern may lead to a block from editing. ''''''chatspy " +Perhaps the mention should say that Lieberman has announced his intention to join the Democratic caucus (which he did during the election). We can't anticipate that he will actually go through with his pledge, although I would have thought it's pretty much certain. Sanders made no such pledge and it's reasonable to let him remain as Independent. . “ fys aym”. +- The network has also produced and acquired new original series unrelated to Hasbro properties... and various Warner Bros. Animation series, such as Batman Beyond, Batman: The Animated Series, Superman: The Animated Series and Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman, Animaniacs and Tiny Toon Adventures. Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman is a live-action series and it's confusing when included in the list of Warner Bros. Animation series. +" No, you were complaining about Landon's civility. Because you're a bigot. Everyme " +Did Tamerlan have ID on him when they found him? +" Opium or hashish? I don't know any Arabic, but running down the poem for another article I encountered several references to ""Benk u bode"" as meaning ""hashish and wine"", not ""opium and wine"". Please check this. " +You horrid little shit I've been monitoring your editing patterns like a true stalker, and have noted that you made no edits between 15th and 19th June. Perhaps you might like to comment on the reasons behind this? 94.4.112.99 +" Justanother Hey! I'm glad you wrote me. This guy is exactly the kind of person I do not like. I don't know where to begin describing everything that is wrong with him. I can see it in the replies to you as well. L.Ron's military career, if it is fabricated, is obviously worth discussing. I don't know why it would be fabricated, it wouldn't change my opinion of him or anythiing, so many times things aren't what they seem, but it's still worth looking into. It isn't 'he said, she said', it can be figured out what the truth is. And he says anything else is PR. This is what bugs me about justanother, he says things like they are fact. NO, it isn't just PR. It could be that he lied, it could be that there was a mistake, etc. That isn't PR. Ok, now I'm reading the posts on yourpage. This is so hard to understand. You're not supposed to talk about Scientology with him, he says? ""Is that clear""? See,he speaks to people with an air of superiority, like he is the voice of reason, of authority.""And I have no doubt that you consider yourself the soul of equanimity and justice."" COMPLETE PROJECTION. Whoa, I'm on the Barbara Schwarz page, he did this with me to. I don't understand those people who feel the need to inform you of obvious thigns you would never do like you need them to inform you otherwise you would do it. He did that to me at first when we were friendly regarding editing Scientology pages (telling me not to do this or that, which I would never have done). I think the good thing is that this is just the internet. If it were real life, we would be able to tell in a second what was up with this guy and we wouldn't apply him the same weight that we apply other people. I sometimes forget that when I use the net because you're not getting the feel of the person saying the weird thing. It used to bug me some of the things that critics of Scientology used to say, and then I saw photos and video of them, and it made sense. You could tell they weren't really there, so I wasn't upset anymore. I'd love to see what this guy looks like. I'd probably end up feeling sorry for him and have compassion and overlook all the incredibly rude traits he has. I don't know how to explain how things got bad between us. It's just his personality, who he is, and I disagree iwth it, find it incredibly rude and invalidating to other people, and just let him know. You're on the Scientology's 'enemies' list? What happened? You defintely didn't imply anythiing negative about Scientology, it's all good. People I know make jokes about Scientology and it's totally fine. I know what I don't like and don't agree it and I'm not sensing any of that from you. Another thing about Anynobdoy, is he DOES seem like everything is pro-Scientology, no matter what, and I've noticed that with some Scientologists, but that's not me, and that's wrong. I dislike a lot of Scientologists I've met because I can tell the kind of people they are and the kinds of things that they would do or think, and I'm just not okay with that. Scientology isn't some group that you join and become this ideal Scientologist and just turn into that. It's like when I go to the gym. I don't adapt the feeling and personality of the gym and the people in the gym. I go there to work my body, to use it as a tool. I do the same thing with Scientology. I really hate when people do that because what starts happening is they start feeling like they're better than others because they ""act"" more like an ideal Scientologist than people who aren't doing that, and all sorts of other things, which I think our friend here might've done. ) That was long and rambling, but I've been up all night with little sleep ! Write me back. " +Katie Holmes needs her own section. I am too lazy to do it. +I do not have any ax to grind. Their museum website depicts some of the most amazing fossil and geological specimens I have ever seen. I did not understand why I and my colleagues had never heard of these discoveries, and why the Chinese government was not promoting such a historic museum. Inconsistencies started immediately popping up. You cannot fool geologists. You should not be able to fool Wikipedia editors either, unless they ignore WP:RS and WP:Notability requirements. +No matter, I'm a mega-polyglot. I hatched out a plea on the Italian Wikipedia for anyone to give evidence showing that Charun chops people with his hammer. If anyone has anything to back up your silly claims, the fact that we are turning up nothing despite banding Wikipedias together in three different languages should give you a major clue that you're barking up a bad tree, Scott. The fact that a dumb idea has been senselessly propogated into the public stream of consciousness doesn't mean that the idea is true or verified. +Need more on Hephaestion. +Delete? Please do not delete this article without letting me know. Thanks. +" Help someone This appeared on Skinny87's page, the very person who said that I had it coming and probably helped request the block. His friend Roger Davies then blocked me. The following is copied from Skinny87's talk page. This is confirmation of collusion. It stinks. Upcoming elections Please give serious thought to standing for coordship in the upcoming elections. You'd be a real asset ) – Roger Davies talk Here? – Roger Davies talk It's a doddle really, once you get the hang of it. If I can do it, I'm sure you can ))) – Roger Davies talk Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Skinny87""" +P.S. How about a nice screengrab of him cross-eyed, foaming at the mouth whilst spouting fascist drivel on Question Time! Much more appropriate! 82.7.144.151 +why is this communist 50 Cent Party member Jsjsjs1111's vandalism still not corrected? communist party member Jsjsjs1111's vandalism here are the evidence to prove that what he deleted are all based on the truth. 1. the British Chinese Youth Federation whose Website has expired. [bcyf.org.uk bcyf expired web page] 2. the Big Ben Award Corporation whose web site has no contact information contact us has no email, no phone number, no address. +And I don't give a damn. +If you don't like it. You can kiss my Rebel ass. +" (UTC) Warnings like this go on user talk pages, not article talk pages; putting them on article talk page is considered disruptive and combative. I know this is old news and Sparkzilla probably knows this already, but incoming new editors might not. — [talk] [contrib] ツ 07:06, 25 March 2007" +Nice job, Wikipedia http://www.boychat.org/messages/1088517.htm - There's only a couple editors left dealing with the pedophiles that drop their propaganda in favor of themselves all over Wikipedia, sounds like you guys are still doing a bang-up job over here. You stay classy. +something called style and faith and honesty. Try one of three or fuck off. S. +" How is Satellite released under the name 'Lena', the artist name on the CD cover is 'Lena Meyer-Landrut'. Also, I don't think there has been any confirmation she plans to ditch her last name entirely, or that she only plans to use Lena as a stage name other than the album cover. |talk " +Vandalism If you do not stop Your IP Will be Permenantly blocked from editing Wikipedia, Caese now or I Will report you or better yet, Pay you a visit tonight accompanied by my favorite Shotgun. Would you Want that? Would you??? Thought So. And for the sake of your family and health, leave John Robinson a.k.a be. +Much appreciated. Thank you ) +" I noticed a conspicuous edit to Simon's talkpage here. Might be worth investigating. toxic " +Is Reye’s model really taught in Europe? It isn't at KTH in Sweden and Anton van Beek from TU Delft cites Archard's equation in Advanced engineering design, and he is well known in the academic world of tribology. +for the mistakes I made. +" Eastlake Exit Signs used to say both ""East Lake Blvd"" and ""Eastlake Blvd"" for this exit. After construction wrapped on phase 1 of the Carson City freeway, the exit number was changed and the signs that said ""East Lake"" were corrected to read ""Eastlake"". Also, I removed the SR 429 reference from this part of the exit since Eastlake Blvd is not on SR 429. To leave it in would be analogous to putting ""(SR 430)"" after Damonte Ranch Pkwy, South Meadows Pkwy and Neil Road, just because Virginia Street can be easily accessed from these interchanges. As a compromise on the Eastlake exit, I put ""To SR 429"" in the notes column." +Oh look a fucking islamist with admin powers fuck you asswipe. +I reverted your edit because I have been informed differently, if this is not just your opinion then show me the rule. If you revert again we will need to take seek conciliation. +" It's at . There's no meat to it. He says NH will keep referring to Pluto as the ""ninth planet"" but then argues again, as he did in 2000, for everything-round-is-a-planet, which would also not leave Pluto at number nine. In 2000 he also argued for a different use of the word ""dwarf,"" but he seems to have gotten over that one. " +How is asking questions vandalism? +It was more an issue between Andrej N. B. and Mutt Lunker. I said I was fine with removing Hitler - but you did put Mozarts picture back on the page - . Remove him and use Lorenz - that's fine with me. +That sort of behavior of Jtdirl, which seems to be regular, is one of the main reasons why it is entirely justified to write frankly in the relevant discussion one's objective opinion of Jtdirl's there-relevant behavior and facts supporting the opinion. +its MY TALK PAGE . HELLO CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT. I AM SHELBY YOUNG AND I WANT MY NAME OFF THIS WEBSITE AND PER JIM WALES I CAN REMOVE BOTH THE IP ADDRESS AND MY TALK PAGE SO GTFO. wHY ARE ALL my DISCUSSIONS CALLED VANDILISM, BUT yours AREN'T, gtfo. +" Were you planning on starting another project where these commandments might apply? They certainly don't square with policy around here.    talk  " +" My recent RfA Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ Review Me! " +The statement Due to close proximity to each other there have been relations people inhabiting the islands of what is now Ireland and the United Kingdom for as much as we know of their history is misleading at best, erroneos at worst. It mixes Ireland, a geographic area, with the UK, a country. +" Samoa mo Samoa - Mata Usi Wikipedia Samoa (i/səˈmoʊ.ə/; Samoan: Sāmoa, IPA: [ˌsaːˈmoa]), officially the Independent State of Samoa (Samoan: Malo Sa'oloto Tuto'atasi o Sāmoa), formerly known as Western Samoa, is a country encompassing the western part of the Samoan Islands in the South Pacific Ocean. Samoa announced their independence to Aotearoa - New Zealand in 1962. The main island of Samoa is Upolu, and is one of the largest islands in the Polynesian Triangle, next to Savai'i. The capital city, Apia, and Faleolo International Airport are situated on the island of Upolu. Samoa was admitted to the United Nations on 15 December 1976.[6] The entire island group, inclusive of American Samoa, has been called “Navigators Islands” by late European explorers, who at 3000 years after Polynesia's ""Age of Navigation"" surged into an era of exploration. Before the 20th century because of the Samoans' seafaring skills, and origins of Polynesian culture, History Main article: History of Samoa Many recent studies into the pre-history of Samoa has been taken up by Asia Pacific Universities, including departments in Aotearoa - New Zealand. In general public education, the Polynesian Expansion is chronologically studied in the range of 3,000 years, leading off at a Lapita site at Mulifanua during the 1970s.[8] The origins of ""The Samoan Expansions"" are linked to the Pre-historical waves of Southeast Asian expansions which is a continued study in modern research in various scientific disciplines such as Genetics, Linguistics and Anthropology. Scientific research resides on the results that the Samoans originate from, or of, the ancient lines of Austronesian expansions and predecessors during some of the first waves expansions eastward across Southern Asia and Asia Pacific. The Lapita expansion period from Southeast Asia through Melanesia between 2,500 and 1,500 BCE is an on going Anthropological interest.[9] The Samoan origins are currently being thoroughly assessed due to new scientific evidence and carbon dating findings from 2003 and onwards. It's theorized that intimate sociocultural and genetic ties were maintained in Pre-historical eras between the Polynesian Lapita colonies. Archaeological record supports Samoan oral History and Genealogy that indicate inter-island exploration, war, colonization, and eras of Monarchal ties between ancient Samoans, Tongans, Fijians, and in Eastern Polynesia orders - Ali'i. Studio photo depicting preparation of the Samoa 'ava ceremony c. 1911. Interior of Samoan house, Apia, Urville 1842.At the final arrival of western exploration in the early 18th century. Jacob Roggeveen (1659–1729), a Dutchman, was the first documented to sight the Samoan islands in 1722. This visit was followed by another western explorer Louis-Antoine de Bougainville (1729–1811), who named them the Navigator Islands in 1768. Contact was limited before the 1830s which is when missionaries and traders began seeking relations with Samoan orders. Religious missions were cautious in Samoa which began in the late 1830's by John Williams, of the London Missionary Society arriving in Sapapali'i from The Cook Islands and Tahiti.[10] According to Barbara A. West, another western author seeking interests of readers, ""The Samoans were also known to engage in “headhunting,” a practice invoked in ancient Samoan warfare, in which a warrior took the head of his slain opponent to give to his leader, thus taking his Mana.""[11] By that time, the Samoans had gained a reputation of being savage and warlike from a famously published French journal of the times, which insued panic during that time, and a wonder of Samoan invasion. The violent altercations had occurred between a village of Samoa and a French expedition [La Perouse Expedition], who had lost almost the entire crew leaving the expedition adrift, over a French sailor direspecting a Samoan woman. Later expeditions by the British, German, and American forces, who by the late nineteenth century understood the invaluble oceanic position of Samoan trade, sought it's cooperation in resupply and refueling for coal-fired shipping and whaling. Wilhelm Solf, German governor of Samoa 1900-1910 Mata'afa Iosefo (1832-1912) paramount chief & rival for the kingship of SamoaThe Germans in particular began to show great academic and commercial interest in Samoa, especially on the island of 'Upolu where German firms established trade with Samoa in copra and cocoa bean processing; the United States rushed into the new Pacific international trade and formed alliances with Samoan orders, be it the Chiefs, High Chiefs of the public, or with the current anointed Monarch. Most intuitively, the American government established their strongest relations on the islands of legend, Tutuila and Manu'a, (which later became a pro +once it's fully released it will get more attention ;) +what were talking about +you just d ont understand rthat i tret you this way only becasue you began treating me this way, with total lack of respect or apology, i have made frequent attempts to reconsile, but you simply get angry again, and shoot off more distribe. it would be cute if it wasnt so annoying. +To illustrate the importance of poets in traditional Arab society, her entire tribe became Muslim directly after her death and it was specifically attributed to her poetry no longer affecting her tribe. [Alfred, Guillaume. The Life of Muhammad - A Translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah - Oxford University Press, 2004 Pg 676.] +I think that's an understatement; I think it does not make any sense at all.— +Sir I feel bullied and victimised. These users were successful in deceiving you by getting me blocked. I did not vandalise at all and I did not edit warring. These users such as Blixx are vandals, have you not seen what they have written about Haitham Al Haddad. +" It would help if you knew what ""slang"" was, seeing you don't I have nothing left to say to you. Look up ""fact"" as well. Good boy." +Suddenly multiculturalist no longer replies? Obviously because i exposed your sock. Furthermore don't delete others comments. My question still stands - why are you here when your userpage states you are far-left wing? You are not neutral and are breaking wikipedia policiy on neutrality by posting here. +You have not read that discussion correctly. Forget the closing remarks: the usage was deemed not to meet our policies. - +Hey! No more hanky-panky on a shrunken sandy! 77.184.28.171 +I like WMC. He's mostly a reasonable guy. I don't like the way he treats folks ... I've tried to tell him. I've tried to offer heart felt advice for him to improve. Really, seems like everyone else posts there, having nearly 400 followers. Might defend him or challenge an admin to defend him. Might congratulate him on self improvements. Might ask him for feedback on my drafts articles one day , , (wow just realized i am missing one). For the most part, I suspect he believes justice should serve him over serving all fairly. Really, it is his selfish pride that is holding up ArbCom and article developments. It going to be best for him and others when he accepts his ignorance of the disruption he causes. Here's my WMC talk page history , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , which seemed to have little effect, guess I better change my ways. +" Dubious toe claim I've added the dubious tag to the toe claim because: Given Cartwright's paternalistic attitude it seems implausible he would prescribe it. Szasz is not unbiased; besides, almost everyone is somewhat biased against racists. Szasz is, anyway, not a primary source. It seems like all sources regarding drapetomania are actually secondary to one paper published by Cartwright. My guess is that toes of runaway slaves were amputated, perhaps as ""treatment"" for drapetomania, but that Cartwright himself never prescribed this. Anyway, perhaps I will check local libraries for the Szasz book, and try to find his source. No promises though. – " +hey dead set Fuckhead!! +Well, you're very rude! I was only trying to get to know about your situation. I'm not a paedophile or anything like that, though I'm sure you doubt my motives in talking to you! Can't you just regress from your silly little persona for a moment or two? You aren't a doctor, you aren't a barrister; you're just a Wikipedia with too much time and not enough love! How tragic it sounds! That sounds too similar to my situation... woe is me!! Anyway, I've tried and I've failed. Tried is also an anagram for tired, that which I am. Goodnight MR JD_UK. (Remember what I have said though, please. Remove it if you will, I shan't care too much whilst I am in the land of nod, only to revert it back tomorrow anyway). Sleep well my pansy. +I would agree that a kind of synopsis (i.e what does this sonnet actually mean?) on each sonnet that would help out the average school age student would be useful. I wouldn't want to stray to far into an individual interpretation though. I think there should be quite a bit of citing sources for these kinds of articles which are more subjective than objective. Anyway it's a really big project which I feel will take some time. Thanks for your contributions +" BASC stats Just to let you know I got around to publishing the backlog of stats on WP:AC/N. Cheers, (talk) " +yuck your one of the most disgusting creatures ive ever met +", 2014}} Morgan offers a take on duality and inherent hypocrisies in being a feminist woman, who supports black male-centric movements like Farrakhan's Million Man March, and also hip-hop which she argues has many male-centric elements. She explores the dynamic of maintaining her feminism, while also enjoying male, particularly black male culture, and discusses balancing feminism while also benefitting from some parts of the gendered nature of society. She asks herself questions like ""Can you be a good feminist and admit out loud that there are things that you kinda dig about patriarchy?"" and ""Suppose you don't want to pay for your own dinner, hold the door open, fix things, move furniture, or get intimate with whatever's under the hood of a car""? She cites hip-hop artists like R. Kelly, Jodeci, Lil' Kim, Queen Latifah and as the vehicles through which she makes her point about some of the honest dualities that come with feminism.{{cite book|last1=Morgan|first1=Joan|title=When Chickenheads come home to roost: my life as a hip-hop feminist|date=March 10, 1999|publisher=Simon & Schuter|isbn=0684822628|pages=49-62|accessdate=Nov 18" +Suck my cock you stupid bitch!:) +Thanks Thanks for rving the vandalism on my user page. If you happen to rv vandalism there again, feel free to up the vandal counter by 1. +Labeling edits as vandalism when they are clearly not is a personal attack +Oh dear, he's at it again! I saw your post on the deletion of Monique deMoan. Well, you may be interested to know that +" (ec) ""From time to time, a discussion about an article will have a majority of its content that, in the judgment of the community may potentially cause harm to some person or to some organization."" and Courtesy blanking, history blanking or oversighting should be rare, and should be performed after due consideration is given to fairness issues. seem to be jumping out at me. " +" AfD nomination of Mark Mahon I have nominated Mark Mahon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Mahon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? (talk) • (contribs) " +"I am removing the following section for two reasons: ""Some anthropologists and sociologists are critical of the method because it measures personality traits on a basis of its synonymous adjectives in the English language, thus overlooking possible cultural construction of language. That English alone was used in factor analysis also arguably demonstrates an example of ethnocentrism. Furthermore, sociologists are critical that the theory only reinforces stereotypes and ignores social factors that might have lead to traits being present in certain groups of individuals. For instance, while women have a demonstrated tendency towards agreeableness, this is likely true of most subordinated individuals. Tying this trait to women at a psychological level then only reasserts inequalities by implying that differences exist as a matter of human nature rather than as a result of the social construction of gender."" 1. The information given there is incorrect. I've checked the scientific research to be sure, and English alone was *not* used in factor analysis, and the existence and nature of the Big Five factors has been validated in multiple continents. Here's an excerpt from McCrae & Hofstede's fascinating paper, Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture (2004): ""Research in the English-speaking world using the NEO-PI-R established that individual differences in the factors are stable throughout most of the adult life span; that self-reports generally agree with observer ratings; and that the five factors, as well as the more specific traits that define them, are strongly heritable. In the 1990s, researchers around the world began to develop translations 2 of the instrument, making cross-cultural research possible. A series of studies showed that much the same factor structure was found in a wide variety of cultures (McCrae & Costa, 1997), that developmental trends in the mean levels of personality traits between adolescence and later adulthood appeared to be universal (McCrae et al., 1999), and that similar gender differences were found among cultures (Costa, Terracciano, & McCrae, 2001)."" Here are the relevant citations from the above; if you can find them, I suggest taking a look: McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Lima, M. P., Simões, A., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., et al. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466-477. Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., &McCrae;, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331. As a further note in this regard, one group of subordinated individuals - prisoners - show personality profiles with low Agreeableness scores. Teenagers also show lower Agreeableness than adults. So I don't think it's ""likely true of most subordinated individuals"" that they have high Agreeableness. In point of fact, it appears that Extroversion actually has more to do with social dominance than Agreeableness does. (And men score higher in the Assertiveness sub-scale of Extroversion, incidentally, as given in the last study cited above.) 2. Beyond being incorrect, I don't like the above statement because it demonstrates bias. The fact that psychometric research ""reinforces stereotypes"" does not show that the research is bad or wrong; instead, it supports the truth to these stereotypes. Whether women are Agreeable because of genetic or environmental reasons is irrelevant to the question of whether Agreeableness is a valid and universal psychomentric construct. And of course while sociologists and anthropologists may be unhappy about these research results, that doesn't change the facts. Hopefully this explanation is thorough enough to obviate the necessity of future arguments. 22:26, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) Clearly the point is biased in some direction; it is, after all, called criticism. However, it is appreciatable to rework claims rather than remove them entirely, as for example my move to redirect back the bias of your word ""discovered"", implying a factual truth of the matter, back to the more neutral term identified, and my return of your loaded attempt of beginning the criticism section with ""While the general consensus favoring a five-factor model is strong, there is still dissention."" And how was the Big Five originally constructed if not through factor analysis of personality traits from the English dictionary? That's what I had read. If later attempts were made to see if othe +hello don't read it +Done; no nuisance at all! ☎ +After having a look at the articles in question, I am even more convinced that these are very dubious references. The SMH article is actually a secondary source, with the quote in question coming from tipping.com, which is an American website. I visited tipping.com and I can't even find the quote as it was used in the SMH story, suggesting that they may have changed their minds in the last couple of years! The other article by USA Today seems to be more compelling (suggesting a 10 - 12% tip for Australian restaurants but no tip for other services), but again doesn't correlate with my experiences. As mentioned above, I worry about the quality of the research in the article, because it clearly says that New Zealand has no tipping, and yet seems to think that Australia (which is just over the way from NZ) has a totally different tipping custom. My experience has been that this is not the case, and I would think that the tipping custom that applies in NZ applies equally in Australia. +Again you are mentioning that one person is the entire consensus. How about you research the source and decide if it's reliable. Also how come Wisdom89 is getting away with Edit Warring? ( ) +I think I have dealt with all the points you have raised above. In particular, I have added a section on Desert Farming and expanded the Desert Warfare section. I have also attended to the matters raised by and have been liaising with him on some of the points he makes. For example, I have rewritten parts of the section on weathering in accordance with more up-to-date research. Comments by AfadsBad +Yeah, performance artists are always crashing cars into buildings and setting themselves on fire. +ESD Hello. I undid the DarknessBot's double redirect fix because ESD later became disamb. page. Just letting you know - for your info. Cheers! -) +Dates How do you do that script assisted date thingy? - (contribs) +I agreed with the anon IP's comment, so I was bold and created Moist (disambiguation) and moved all the content about other bands to new articles about the respective bands. Those articles might well end up getting deleted for lack of notability, but if that is the case, then they probably do not need to be mentioned in this article about the Canadian band either. Feedback is welcome, +Lets go with google books: 500 Days: The War in Eastern Europe, 1944-1945 - By Sean M. Mcateer, p. 184 This Battle of Tali-Ihantala probably convinced Stalin that conquering Finland was not worth the cost. Finland at War 1939-45 - By Philip Jowett, Philip S. Jowett, Brent Snodgrass, p. 13-15 Had the Soviet 21st Army been victorious it could have continued north to take Helsinki, and whole of the Finland would have been occupied. The Finnish victory here... (under entry Battle of Tali-Ihantala) Just couple of examples for starters, and no one has even started adding Finnish books to the list. If this (attribution) is insisted it should be realized that it will not improve the article in any manner, only convolute it. - +This bitch is a cunt! This bitch is a cunt! +" Yes, exactly, as the article is covering outbreaks of infectious disease. Those outbreaks are historical and relevant to this topic and go directly to the recognition that super-spreaders exist in the first place. And the 1993 Paul Fine article is a classic article in epidemiology. That can stay, as I've added his update from 2011, as can the article that mentions the Pennsylvania school outbreak in 1989. " +|class=Start|importance=top}} {{WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina +" Speedy deletion of Seby torreblanca Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Talk " +Commercial means they make a profit dummy. 214.13.192.187 +Yep, that's referenced in this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#Foreign_relations. Also, the Clark Memorandum should be noted as the origin of the public nature of the Good Neighbor Policy. +Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. wat's sup +Go for it, dipshit. You're just another islamo/christian terroist. Fuck off already! get the fuck out of my coutnry! Move to fucking Pakistian! +" Aw, thank you. Aha. It's not an exciting part of the year, it's the end of January (already), aha. And I run an online alternate music RPG. And my websites are for my websoaps that I write. Nope, not being nosey, aha. TALK! " +" It should be done because 'there is widespread criticism of Craig and his views to the extent that this is a part of his life' just as there is for Richard Dawkins and just as there is a controversy paragraph on the Richard Dawkins page. Craig makes contervisial statements and has highly contrevsial beliefs like that of thinking creationism is a viable alternative for evolution and being against homosexulaity. Such comments and criticism on this needs to be displayed, just as there is a section on contervisy and criticism for Richard Dawkins for his techniques and views, there needs to be one on this page and it can be easily argued, that there is even more need for such a section given that 'thinking creationism is a viable alternative for evolution and being against homosexulaity' are much, much more controversial views than that of new atheism. To not show such criticism, or make a note on these views being highly controversial would be simply wrong, there is no question about it. For the time begin I will add a quick sentence, just to make note of it, until we can together, even if there is need of an official dispute, decide what should be in the criticism/controversy paragraph. DocHeuh " +Oh no, are you going to punish me? I'm SO SCARED. I gotta take off now for a bit, sweetheart, but I'm excited to see what you'll have made when I get back. I HOPE IT'S DRAMA! 24.177.120.138 +" Minor Additon Changed the line "".....Denis (""Sonny"") O'Neill, a former British marksman...."" To former British Army, as to avoid any confusion regarding Sonny's nationality K.B. McKenna" +You know, if you don't tell me what I did wrong, I don't see what I can learn from it.76.10.75.168 +" Going by immediate place of origin is much more in keeping with the definition of ""Hispanic or Latino"". You're acting in good faith, obviously, but claiming every Hispanic/Latino person based on ancestry is too OR, too subjective, as can be seen from all that explaining you've had to do. There is a way to include these people we're discussing: with the support of reliable sources that refer to them as Hispanic or Latino, something that ideally should be done for everyone on the list. " +The problem I think is that the slash makes the page a subpage of whatever page name precedes the slash. Fatuorum +" Hello (I was just about to tell you why I removed it when you asked ). A few things to keep in mind about the front page: make sure the ""selected articles"" section displays fine on an 800x600 display (mainly, no extra line breaks), make sure the article is more than a stub before listing it, and, for the ""in the news"" section, make sure it's ""headline"" news (think cnn front page). Oh yeah, one other thing, add new items to the front not the back. Well, I think that about covers it. Regards. 23:55 17 Jun 2003 (UTC)" +Public Opinion Frankly as a member of the UNB campus and as a person who pays for the Brunswickan whether I like it or not, I think that the paper requires improvements, some of them quite drastically. I do not think that the removal of the cricism section in this page was warranted, and I would like to see it back, perhaps with some modifications. And as soon as I get some new batteries for my mouse, I may do just that. Does anyone else have any opinions on the matter? +1st Archive August 20, 2005 2nd Archive September 2, 2005 +Prioryman, having some experience with B-Machine myself on this article's talk page here [] in which he sole interest seems to be trolling and looking for trouble by repeatedly removing relevant discussion material to the article, I can tell you that you are not alone in feeling pestered by this user. B-Machine, might I suggest you stop trolling on this website. So as to avoid breaking the three revert rule, I now suspect he's sockpuppeting as another user on that article's discussion page. Typical troll behavior. B-Machine, If you'd like to contribute respectably, you're more than welcome to; however, if you'd like to just continue being an ass and causing trouble, get the hell off Wikipedia! 66.175.205.221 +" """"WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?!"""" The article was poorly written, I rewrote it so it didnt look like shit, look at my final edit you fucking dumbass." +Test? Originally it was booked to be Test Vs Chris Jericho, due to Jericho hitting Stacy with a chair, why was Test replaced by Jeff Hardy and should it be noted in the article? +I agree that it should most probably not be mentioned in the lede. However, blanket reversion of cited content without adequate justification by anonymous IP editors does not encourage me to do the hard work for them! +" Nice guy vs jerk Nice guys often come from a secular background, who are wrongly taught at home from an early age to respect the opposite sex and see her as equal in terms of intelligence and everything else. Jerks on the other hand come from semi-religious households (the extremes of abrahamic religions often) who by default see the opposite sex as inferior and in need of protection. This makes sense when you think of the so called ""Girl-power"". Girl-power is completely useless on a jerk, a girl cannot hurt a jerk's feeling with her words and gestures because he's simply not thinking about what she says, but instead if the girl was to attack the jerk physically then he would in fact respond to it very violently. 84.241.20.45 Goshtaasp" +As you are a FilePile member (number 3543), you can verify the screenshot by going to FilePile. - +So the cold wind blows from the north at midday. +" I think you actually skipped the ""friends"" part and I insist from the pattern of your posts that you are very much a Turk hater!" +" Wikipedia an interesting yet frustrating thing. You get pseudo-intellectuals who have no idea about the RM show yet think their ""wise"" guesswork is better than facts from one who watches. Imagine a world run by people who haven't got a clue yet force their views & values on others in the deluded idea ""they"" are right. The World's finances would be fucked up, entertainment would be more documentaries & real-life than comedy, music would be bland & crass (etc etc). Oops it actually is... The incompetent & inept with old money = the shit we are in today. Ha Ha Ha... oh." +Wikify Performance Task I suggest someone better wikify the Performance Aliases section. Ex: Keith Matthew Thornton'' is his real name.Exxon''': He gave out cards at shows... +No it's not vandalism, its the truth. +" What the Hell? Bill Oreilly Site According to ""Vandalism"" guidelines. ROFL I am not vandalising anything. 1. Omitting insuinating or biased commentary is part of the ""Editing"" features 2. I am not inserting information that in any way is meant to destroy the integrity of the information 3. Authors siting ""Left Wing"" website ""Media Matters"" as a legitimate and postable source of information is not credible 4. Some of the information in the article is blatently false or unsubstantiated heresay that can not be proven 5. I am newb...and editing for very first time tonight...and I will continue to edit some more until somebody points out an actual violation....or some facist administrator decides sits in his self appointed post..." +North Korea Nuclear Weapon Test I can't help to notice that it was removed from the article, are we not going to add it, or shall we wait until information is absolutely solid? +Kurds are an Iranian people if you discuss the sources they are applying closeness and proximity to other ethnic groups within the Iranian peoples. +erroneous nature of the criticism. +Good to know. Even if the loop is streched over two pages, like 1 redirecting to 2 and 2 calling 1, that will also cause a template loop. +"~ ''''(Talk|Contribs)problem solving " +Islamic State dating back to al-Qaeda in Iraq in +You're actually incorrect - three names of terrorism experts are in the lead who have discredited Mylroie, and no quotes. There is one quote in the lead which praises her work highly. Meanwhile, I myself did not add any of these criticisms - they were already on the page, and in the lead, before you began your edits, all of which appear to be heavily biased in favor of presenting Mylroie in a more positive light. This could be seen as advocacy for the subject, which is explicitly forbidden by Wikipedia. I do welcome your response and dialogue, as many previous attempts to engage in a discussion with you have failed. However, to say I am biased is incorrect - I was merely attempting to restore balance to the page that had been upended by your extensive editing towards one point of view. I've restored the lead to how it was - if you engage in further white-washing, I will revert it. If you continue your non-NPOV edits, that will indicate it's time to get an admin involved. Thank you. +Incorrect etymology No, it's from the Greek 'euaggelos' meaning 'good news' or 'gospel'. 'Eu' is a positive prefix: euphoria, euthanasia, eugenics etc. 'Angel' is from the Greek aggelos meaning 'messenger' +This is true. If you have the university calander it tells about the history which it is trying to keep. I dont see how this is in violation of the policy +Huaorani language > Sabela language I see you have recently made this move. The naming issue was discussed on the talk page, and Sabela is neither a term from the Huaorani themselves, nor in frequent recent usage. If you have reason to suspect otherwise, please bring it to the talk page rather than moving first. +" Proposal I propose a solution to the issue posed by the guideline regarding disambiguation pages (and the resulting AfD): keep the article, and simply remove ""(disambiguation)"" from the article title. Thus, this would become the article Apartheid, with a short definition and citation to the Afrikaans origin, and then links to the various usages, with History of South Africa in the apartheid era being the first and most prominent link, with the others following, retaining the language about usage being an analogy to South African apartheid. This solves the disambiguation guideline issue. I don't believe there is a consensus to delete this article, and argued in favor of keeping it, but I acknowledge the argument that it is less of a literal/classic disambiguation page and more of a ""here are some uses of the term which have Wikipedia articles"" page. I believe there are a number of precedents for that type of page, where a term is discussed in different contexts, some or all of which have individual articles. " +" Bernard Madoff lawsuit The bank served as the principal institution for Bernard Madoff and currently in litigation over $6.4 billion.(See: ""Madoff trustee readies amended JPMorgan lawsuit"") Nicholas Tyrell Former Managing Director and Head of European Real Estate Research and Strategy at JP Morgan Asset Nicholas Tyrrel overdosed on heroin in April 2011. (See: ""Investment Banker Died After Accidentally Overdosing On Heroin Tea"") Money laundering In 2001, a U.S. Senate staff report named the institution in a money laundering report.(See: ""Dirty-Money Flow in U.S. Banks Is Huge, a Senate Report Finds"")" +", 23 May 2009 (UTC) And of course somebody had to ""Warn"" me for ""Attacking"" wikipedia members. I didn't attack anyone. Its just so painfully obvious that they arent ""Rock"". Its such a generic term. And Korn ISNT generic...75.139.103.133 01:39" +Once two people are involved in a discussion, they normally follow each other on the general area, and this is reasonable and expected; it's only wrong when they start following everything unrelated each other may also work on. As I personally work on many different things, I myself often do not follow up as much as I ought to, nor can I always respond immediately, and I am always grateful if someone suggests I may want to take another look. If they've asked me too often, I tell them. '''''' ( talk ) +" Merge On Stranger Tides Per WP:NOTFILM, ""Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles."" We should merge Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides into this article, as its article is almost entirely copied from this one anyway. " +Think links you added to the current events portal are non-contextual Please review Wikipedia:How_the_Current_events_page_works#The_context_is_not_the_geographical_location and the following paragraph on subject. The articles crane, and locations in New York are not specific to the event. Lemmey talk +LaRouche publications are not allowed as sources for articles beyond the movement because they are viewed as self published and unreliable to a unique degree. ·:· ·:· +Sample Timetables I can't see the point of including sample timetables in the article. Sample timetables Times for the London to Penzance service on Mondays to Fridays. Slip coaches and other portions detached from the main train are not included. DateJuly1904Oct.1920Sep.1940June 1965Sep.1987Dec.2006Typicalmotive powerCity &DukeStar; &MogulKing; &CastleWesternHSTHSTLondon; Paddington10:1010:3010:3010:3010:5010:05Reading — — — — — — — — — —10:31Taunton — — — — — —12:33 — — — —Exeter St Davids — — — —13:2013:0912:5012:08Newton Abbot — — — — — — — — — —12:29Plymouth North Road143714:5314:3514:3013:5013:07Devonport — —15:00 — — — — — — — —Liskeard — — — —— —15:0714:1713:33Bodmin Road ♣ — — — — — —15:2114:3013:45Par — — — —15:3315:3414:4013:55St Austell — — — — — —15:4414:4814:03Truro16:1416:2016:0616:0615:0614:22Redruth — — — —— —16:2415:1914:33Camborne — — — — — —16:3215:2514:41Gwinear Road16:4617:3016:35closedclosedclosedHayle — — — — — —16:41 — —14:51St Erth16:5617:0416:4516:4515:3514:54Penzance17:1017:1517:0017:0015:4615:10Journey time7hr 0m6hr 45m6hr 30m6hr 30m4hr 56m5hr 5m ♣ Now named Bodmin Parkway +REDIRECT Talk:Lady Rose (song) +Unitarian ministry career I attempted to insert into this article paragraphs lifted from his main Wikipedia article relating to his short-lived Unitarian ministry career which was exercised during the 1790s, in the period this article covers, in Somerset and at Shrewsbury, Shropshire (at the latter William Hazlitt met him). However the edit was blocked because, according to the message that came up, there were links with particular archive sources that made the copying incompatible. Could someone better able to deal with this carry that out, or advise me how these could be worked around? +Thank you, Newyorkbrad, for your kind words and advice. +Langan Thanks for your compliment about my sense of humor. Thanks also for your contributions to the entry on Chris Langan. As you probably know, this has been a fraught entry for a long time. I have only recently begun to contribute to the entry, but I think positively. If you look at my user page, you will see a copy of my first comment on the entry, and below that a set of links to what I consider to be important edits and comments in the recent history of the entry. I think that together they form a clear picture of what has been occurring with this entry. The recent input by yourself and NightSky has assisted a difficult process in recent days. If you know all this already, forgive me for mentioning it. And if you don't know it already, forgive me for pointing you toward quite a long series of edits that probably won't be that enjoyable to read (except for my own clear and pleasant prose of course). Thanks again. +" I am really happy for you. I will help you as far as possible. (Talk) " +Food Hi, can you help me identify the food I'm eating? I bought it in the Vietnamese store today but forgot what they told me it was called. They're semi-translucent golf ball-sized balls filled with yellow sweet mung bean paste, and in a thick coconut sauce. It's similar to che xoi nuoc but the balls aren't made from rice flour but from tapioca flour, and it's not in ginger-flavored liquid but the thick coconut cream sauce. Thanks, +" I've just made another update adding more details I was too tired to add last time. The article is starting to come together, and I plan to begin working on filling in the {Winners} tables with the 1979-1995 winners. I'm still not really convinced the page even needs the ""Winners"" tables, since the ceremony is equally dedicated to awarding television actors (if not more so) and the categories have changed so much over the years it would be impossible to efficiently list all the winners in the various categories that have popped up and disappeared over the years: Dramatic Films, Comedy Films, Action-Adventure Films, and then the ""splitting"" of categories into age groups, etc. It gets pretty convoluted, so I think it might be a better idea to use the ""Winners"" section to mention some of the notable former child stars who were nominated for or won a Young Artist Award and then went on to receive acclaim as adults, but for now I think the tables that are on the page should at least be complete, so I'll be working on that next. These notes I'm leaving here on the talk page are primarily for the handful of editors who are watching this page, since I know big changes and rewrites can make some watching editors/admins nervous, so I'll be taking this thread down in a week or so after I've finished with the bulk of my work on the page and then probably start a thread to ask other editors if they have an opinion about whether we should keep the ""Best Lead/Supporting Actor/Actress in Film"" tables. - " +"== May 2011 == Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits to the page Eastwood%20Collegiate%20Institute, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you. Some good links for newcomers are: Help contents – the main help page. Quick guide – a ""cheatsheet"" listing the main editing commands. The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! " +Surely concerns re: fossil fuels/alternative energy sources, pollution and other environmental concerns should be included with the mention of animal rights. +"]]== Hi VQuakr I just saw your message from Dec. 15. I understand your policies now. I have made no more edits since then. Is it possible now to remove the warning banner on the article about it possibly being ""auto-biograpghical"" that was not my intent in making the edits I made. Thank you. I notice this article has not been edited since I last removed some promotional content. For to no longer be an autobiography, it needs to be substantially edited by someone other than yourself, which has not happened yet. Feel free to start a discussion about whether the tag is still needed on the article talk page, but since most of content that is there now was created by you, it makes sense keep appraising any readers of the article of its status. " +" Numbers killled The existing text matches is similar to that used for 9/11 which is ""2,973 victims and the 19 hijackers died as a result of the attacks"". I would support a change to that form of words, but do not support the ""were killed by the bombers"" that SlaterStephen has sought to introduce. If the sourced number is 56 not 52 then change the number, that is a different issue. TALK " +" Oh, that's a good point. The present count, then, seems to be about 15,000 words. The sections that seem the easiest to move are ""Hitler's War"" (an article already exists on the topic) and the Reception section. Any complaint with condensing those? (tock) " +How can I be sure? http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ07d.html Federal LAW. ALL PUBLISHED BOOKS IN THE UNITED STATES MUST BE REGISTERED MANDATORY WITHIN 3 MONTHS OF PUBLISHING. That means ALL books. Not eBooks, which is what hers are. She has NO listings at all, for her name, for GODDESSY, for any of her book titles, even the numbers. NOTHING nadda. +" Re: Wrestlecrap The guy posting there as ""Merle Vincent"" is most likely a vandal even though his recent addition to the page made it sound like accurate information. The real Merle Vincent sadly passed away several years ago and it seems that his name is just along the lines of people registering under false names associated with Wrestlecrap to try and get away with vandalism. Definitely take anything this poster says with a huge grain of salt. Thanks again for the help patrolling the page " +Thank you lucky, see what i can do for wikipedia? lol. i will contribue with sports a lot. Thats why i was sad that you guys deleted the teeterdil article. I play many sports -Thanks- Widereceiver19 +" Hello! On WP:EL, in the Links normally to be avoided section, it states that (number 4) ""Links mainly intended to promote a website. See External link spamming."" and also the link provides no other help to the article other than promoting the website and giving a brief summary about the website. The brief summary written next to the external link provides only advertisement and information on the external website and helps the article in no other way. Thanks. " +Robert Blake (Aninote) It's not an advertisement... The site doesn't even EXIST any more. Check the sources! +That wasn't the question. I'm still trying to figure out if you are an idiot or not, an answer like that sways me in a certain direction here. 80.42.3.248 +Minor Point of Style I recommend that the following two sentences be combined, to form the second paragraph. Apparently, User:Mel Etitis thinks otherwise. Numerous independent investigations have repeatedly proven it to be a plagiarism and a hoax.[1] Scholars generally agree that the Okhrana, the secret police of the Russian Empire, fabricated the text in the late 1890s or early 1900s. Will Administrator Mel Etitis kindly explain himself - the reason for his effective reversion? - +" If someone could copy that image w/o all the blank space, that would be highly appreciated by myself...:D (Talk) Done. Cheers. (Talk) " +" It would e nice to add an image caption that includes a famous quote from the modern poets. Gokak's famous statement was ""Mother tongue os the language of the state"". I dont remember where I read it though. " +" Please read the red box at the top of this page. is a robot and not a human. I am Talk to me! See what I have done " +Said It is said in the article that Clinton John Dawkins was in the King's African Rifles. I have not seen a proof of this, apart from Dawkins' own blog. +WP:Hounding and Bullying by non-related editors I have explained myself already, and you have no competence in the article beyond circumventing 3RR on behalf of Kautilya3, hence your odd questions above. Also, tell your non-admin friends with whom I have no interaction to stop commenting on my talk page. Bullying will not serve you or your little gang well. +Becky Becky does not hold dual citizenship anymore. Under Japanese law she chose Japanese at 20. The information is factually incorrect and the reference to it is meaningless. Please correct the informationsince I can't anymore (due to you)or you'll be violating whatever rule there is (there's so many) regarding bios. loboborracho888 +Sign This Comment It's a May 23rd, 2011 release date. +Wow you're cute (^_^) +—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs). You already know WP:EL, so you obviously must be joking... Stop pushing for your site. +Temazepam I reverted your edits since they appear to have moved the article back to a state that contained much inaccurate and misrepresented information. Please see the talk page for the extensive discussions that were involved in verifying the text and citations. +He wouldn't be able to block you for 3RR violation for a week on the first or second occasion, but since you had multiple warnings before and did not listen, this block is quite justified. And heed my words—if you violate 3RR again, I myself will block you for no less than a month.— +" Nope. ""Only concerned with"" means ""concerned with to the exclusion of all else."" The word ""only"" doesn't leave any wiggle room. " +Continued vandalism and lack of neutral tone by NeilN Showing contempt for Wikipedia rules, NeilN vandalized the Santacon article, violated the 3R rule, engaged in edit warring, dismissed neutrality and sided with admins at the expense of Wikipedians. The entire SantaCon article is biased, slanted and not neutral. It violated numerous Wikipedia rules. It demonstrates why admins and moderators on Wikipedia censor and edit articles to reflect their biased points of view. Wikpedia articles are the product of a very few people that edit war, revert with impunity, censor content and quash dissent. 1% of the people control 99% of the content on Wikipedia. Detractors and critics are immediately banned and blocked from expressing their independent points of view. Wikipedia moderators and administrators have adopted the censorship, idea control and repression techniques of anti free speech nations. +" Dear Alexikoua, I am wondering whether there is any informative value in citing the so-called ""1910 census"". This is not an official census, it belongs to a series of documents that had propaganda value, in the sense that it was createed in 1919 to help the Greek delegation persuade other participants in the peace conference to yield to its demands and maximize Greek territorial gains in Asia Minor. I would also be thankful if you could please provide your source for the numbers you cite in the 1914 Ottoman census table. The reason I am asking is that I have Karpat's book right in front of me and some of the numbers differ somewhat. For example, Greeks of Adana vilayet amount to 8,537 in Karpat (1985), pp. 172, 188, not 12,000. Finally, I would like to add a word of caution, if I may: as I found out reading a note in Kostopoulos, Tasos (2007) Polemos kai ethnokatharse, p. 171 [I can confirm this in a couple of days by comparing Karpat's book, pp. 170-189 and Alexandris, Alexis (1999) ""The Greek census of Anatolia and Thrace (1910-1912): a contribution to Ottoman Historical Demography"" in D. Gondicas - Ch Issawi (eds.), Ottoman Greeks in the age of nationalism, Princeton, pp. 58-65] despite having the same name, the boundaries of vilayets vary between Ottoman censuses and that of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, the 1914 census not including certain sanjaks, like Kutahya, Afion Karahisan, Canik (=Samsun), Eskisehir etc, in vilayets. For these minor, but existing nonetheless discrepancies between the two to be eradicated, it is advisable to adjust one of the two administrative divisions to the other's a model being provided by Kostopoulos, (2009), pp. 170-1. " +Thank you! It's nice to see more true believers! +I've removed the following, because it doesn't sound like an encyclopaedia: Another view. This is a totally honest album, Lauryn has hit highs here that can only be achieved a few times in an artists lifetime. It is inspiring, thought provoking, honest, deeply spiritual and completely enjoyable just to listen to even with out an spiritual dimension. Go Lauryn, my prayer for you is that you can weather the storm of ignorant criticism that comes from this CD and that you will give us some more of the same. God Bless +So you don't find how other pages are set up to be compelling? You don't find consistency in pages to be compelling? Suit yourself, but neither precedent nor WP:LEAD are on your side. - +Ialsoagree, The article is now deleted and you have nither allowed time nor respected the 'hang on tag'. I respectfully suggest that either you are a fraction less speedy with your actions, or that your new page patrol principles be rewiewed by more experience editors or admins. +Hey, you are preaching to the choir here, dude ) Remember this one? I couldn't find anything solid about it at the time (except for that NTV gag report). How tempting it must have been to assume the place is not notable beyond its funny name, eh? Well, eat this! The site itself is hardly a reliable source, but it's a very good illustration of what kind of information is available out there. And every other shabby-Russian-village-population-five is going to have at least as much written about it over the years. It's not that there are no sources, it's that there are often no easily accessible sources. What that is so hard to understand to some is beyond me.— • (yo?); May 19, 2010; 21:47 (UTC) +Have again replaced info about Sharlto's dad, and added link to his mom's details, whose contact info can be used to verify parentage. +" Jimmy Wales used to make money from Pornography..... And NOW he has WP ""editors"" working for him as Personal Pimps to propogate WikiPornography... Jimmy Wales used to make money from Pornography. And nothing has changed much. Now he has got WP ""editors"" working as a Personal Pimp for him to PROSITUTE the World-Wide-Web with WikiPornography. As far as, WP guidelines are concerned, all the WP ""editors"" can shove them up in their ass and quack all over the world-wide-web. WP guidelines are NOTHING but Poopy Toilet Papers which most of these ""editors"" use to pursue their agenda. " +Haha, no, that wasn't me- I'm not that cocky/annoying. I love the Paradise, and I've seen a few shows there (Feist also sticking out in my mind). As you used to, my girlfriend goes to BU, and last year (as a freshman) she lived in the building right behind the club, which had its good and bad points. KoC definitely kept everything soothing and sweet, but they also have so much humor. And when Erlend started dancing... oh man, that was something else. That was defintely up there with the best concerts I've ever seen, if not the best. Please, feel free to send pictures from that one, and thanks in advance. +" et tu JamesMLane?? I was always told you were the persuasive one because of your cool calm reasoned responses and up until now I had no reason to doubt this and have always accorded you the respect of analyzing your arguments and either agreeing or disagreeing. But you both shock and surprise me with a personal attack in your very fist sentence. To suggest that I'm some knee-jerk reactionary spoling for a fight with the left wing cabal is to caricature me in a grossly distorted way. I 'm here to remove POV. Period. Now, it is acknowledged by you and others that there are currently a preponderance of liberals in here doing the editing, although no one until you would be willing to admit that there was a left-wing cabal and a sinister one at that! (Remember, you can't say you were 'just joking' because, as we've learned from the liberal editors of the Ann Coulter piece, unless you SPECIFICALLY say 'I was joking' when you make your statment, it means you're as serious as AIDS- so I thank you for that illuminating revelation. It is duly noted.) Anyway, it stands to reason that most of the POV I will encounter is going to be coming from the left. Do you dispute that or do you think this Karl Rove article is filled with right wing hyperbole? As for your arguement - ""we have to interrupt his biography to go off on a side excursion, an article-within-an-article that discusses the subject he addressed..."" I can only say McCain...Black Baby Rumor...see above. lol! I find it hard to believe you can make that arguement with a straight stroke. It is PRECISELY that tit for tat meandering that is the HALLMARK of Ann Coulter and Karl Rove articles. I wish you'd use your persuasive powers to address the McCain push poll incident and Ann Coulters alleged love for terrorists instead of cherry-picking it in a realm where Rove might actually be vindicated. So, I reject your argumentation for now. In fact, I've understood that Move-On's petition may have been specifically what Rove was referring to. Therefore to omit this information would be a deliberate attempt to leave that quote hanging out there and thus tantamount to POV by default. And I think one 911 family group comments deserves another. Or, if you like, we can just use the conservative 911 family group's statements. Since we don't want to make this article 'book-length' do we? Here's my bottom line: What's good for the goose is good for the gander. And what I've seen here since day one is one form of argumentation used to defend an article if it's good for the goose (democrat/liberal) and that EXACT SAME ARGUMENTATION trashed if it looks good for the gander (republican/conservative.) I hope you don't think I'm the only one who sees this. (Oh btw, when I make post these trenchant observations, I'm used to getting rebuked for 'getting away from content' or 'talking politics.' Funny, how your comments of the exact same nature never get that same rebuke. Must be 'cabal club' privileges, huh? ) Take care Big Daddy. Ps I do like your style though. I appreciate the sober analysis that generally exudes from your posts. Even if I don't agree, I respect the approac you have " +Looks good. Don't forget to complete the Fair Use rationale at Image:Riddell01.gif ·:· ·:· +File:EsmeBianco.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EsmeBianco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +Hey now!! Nice. One never know what might happen next. The time of miracles is not past yet. +So you're finally getting tired of Wikipedia Good! Me too! I hope Wikipedia is destroyed! By the way, RFA is dying, no candidates for almost three weeks! Hooray! +" High Times Magazine mistake? I'm reading the December 2009 issue of High Times, and on page 14, there's a mini section about Patrick Swayze smoking marijuana. Quote: A source close to Patrick Swayze told the National Enquirer that medical marijuana is improving the actor's health. Swayze, who is undergoing chemotherapy treatments for pancreatic cancer, says that smoking pot has enabled him to gain weight because it has helped reduce nausea, allowing him to ""keep his food down"". Is it just me or is High Times abit behind on their news? 199.212.27.249 " +An eye for an eye is the only true justice, and I do not trust Wikipedia's standard procedure. It is a broken, anti-Semitic failure of a Web site. +" That was one of your fucking ""copyedit""s. " +It wasn't a bad page... it just needed work to make its style and tone more of a wikipedia article. The tags are not orders and you can remove them yourself if you feel that the article now satifies the general guidelines for style and content. Just for some context: I tagged the article while watching Special:New pages along with about a dozen other articles, and a further dozen (or so) junk/vandal articles that I tagged for speedy deletion... and lots more articles were given a general clean up to pass muster. - (talk) +" Ya, umm, unless you can provide a source that can be viewed, your word isn't good enough. chat " +" The previous sentance indicates what I believe is the basis for this statement: ""exists in an equilibrium with water and carbon dioxide"". If you were to somehow obtain a quantity of pure carbonic acid, some of it would immediately and spontaneously break into water and carbon dioxide and it wouldn't be pure any more. 09:34, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)" +" Causes of the wars in the colonial period My edit reverted by of what would later become United States territory was accompanied by armed conflicts that periodically erupted between the natives and the settlers in the areas that were being colonized."" I think that this is a completely indisputable uncontentious statement, without any POV claims about what the causes were. The previous formulation (""While some historians suggest that settlers were engaged in warfare to open further land for settlement, other historians suggest that settlers needed to defend themselves from attacks by the Indians"") claimed the existence of two mutually irreconcilable camps of historians with opposing theories about the causes of the wars, which I don't think is true. (Obviously, both factors existed; yet I doubt that there are any serious historians would claim that Indian aggression and banditry, and hence the need for defence from these, were the true and primary cause of the wars). If people want to keep this formulation, they should source it. I'm glad that " +REDIRECT Talk:Phon Thong District +Minneapolis wind chills I'm guessing you've never lived in Minneapolis. Here's a random weather date of April 4, 2007, which translates to just a few degrees above 0 wind chill, according the Wind chill chart. I'll research this more fully if you're not convinced. +":Yup. Following it from the beginning as I have uploaded bunch of images from the site. Thanks. - Talk " +With the same reasoning you could say that Catholics worship the Virgian Mary as a goddess, but adccording to 'official' theology this isn't the case. I know some Zororastrians and they claim to have one god. As far as being the equivalet of angels etc. ... I can't really comment. +Abrech is a stupid jew rat. and i hate jews. swastikas are cool. you stupid big nosed smelly jew. go away and stop sending me warnings. ... you fuckhead. +Thanks for the info. That all makes sense. I will be withdrawing these images back to private-use-only (their original intent). Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me - I had not managed to parse that info from all the info online myself. +, 3 December 2009 (UTC) If you don't like Deming or Carter, why don't you suggest a quote that we could use to counterbalance the two you inserted. 23:17 +So, are you not going to answer my question? +Sadly, Your Edit to the AUV page At least you have a sense of Humor! Who are you? +Japaneese Wiki made it Altaic (https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%AA%9E) Must be mentioned, at least. +My sentiment exactly. +PLEASE STOP DELETING MY POSTS!!! +" And those sources are not sufficiently reliable for an accusation that amounts to ""Eichenwald is a pedophile."" " +" Ditto I am overwhelmed by the number of nasty, vicious, self-important and unhelpful self-appointed ""editors"" on Wikipedia." +" If you'd just like to delete it, you can do that and I'll reupload. (talk?) " +" More False Allegations I HAVE NOT MADE ANY LEGAL THREATS I HAVE A SUGGESTION. WHY DON'T YOU SIMPLY REMOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT ME FROM WIKI? I WOULD BE HAPPY WITH THAT. YOU GUYS ARE TOO LITERAL AND HUMORLESS FOR ME TO DEAL WITH. I AM USED TO MORE COMPLEX AND SUBTLE MINDS. THERE IS A COARSENESS IN THE RESOLVING POWER OF THE ""EDITORS"" WHO ARE NOT ABLE TO MAKE THE RELEVANT DISTINCTIONS. YOU GUYS CAN'T SEEM TO SEE WHAT DAVID BOHM CALLED 'SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES"". Right now I consider that several of your ""editors"" are in fact Cyber-Terrorists who are stalking me. CH is a good example. He has been stalking me on the WEB years before Wiki. I suspect some of the others are in league with him. [Jack Sarfatti]" +What's the argument for not including moshzilla? Because someone simply doesn't WANT her included? TOO BAD, ITS ALL OVER INTERNET AND THIS IS A FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA. We dont censor articles right Lilithborne, u submissive fag??? +{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!{{unblock}}LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON, NIGGAZ, 420 MOONSHINE, FUCK!LIFETIME BAN LIFETIME BAN I WANTA FUCKIN LIFETIME BAN!!! BAIL OUT, BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, JESSICA SIMPSON +there is valid content on this page. Please perform a manual merge. talk +FYI you do know that when you report someone, it just makes them more angry at you, and causes them to do more damage. +Removing User Contributions You DO NOT remove user contributions and questions on talk pages just because you don't like them. That is not the nature Wikipedia. +Yahhhh bitch Yahhhhh!!!! 172.168.138.9 +Fair Use Fair use or fuck use. Who gives a flying fuckelwad? +Wow! Everyone's back! Yeah! +It's one thing to include information on Equestria Girls, but there should be more than just describing what each human character looks like. And even if there's a good reason for it, do we need to go into every detail of what they wear? Seems like intricate detail to me. ) +] Heres how I'm seeing this: Posting a link to a fan made model is completely unencyclopedic. Posting said link is unneeded as it adds nothing to the paragraph. There is no controversy, nor even an intense popularity that revolves around this model. It is just a simple model that some people download. If you don't have the balls to sign a comment asking us to keep it, then don't post. I never post anything I don't sign; if I feel strong enough about a topic to speak out on it, then I'd better feel strong enough about it to let people know whose speaking out. In conclusion, I say we do not add the link as Tom Edwards put it best; its just an image that a ton of pimply teens use to mastribate to. +" THIS FUCKING LIBTARD COWARD REVERTS ALL FACTUAL EVIDENCE THAT DISPUTE HIS COMMIE VIEW OF THE WORLD. BUT AGAIN, THE FUCKING UNEMPLOYED LIB COMMIES OF WIKI HAVE ABSOLUTE POWER AND ARE TRYING TO CREATE A LEFTIST VIEW OF THE WORLD. FUCK YOU WIKI. ==Blocking to gain an advantage in a content dispute is strictly prohibited. Sysops must not block editors with whom they are currently engaged in a content dispute. If in doubt, report the problem to other admins to act on. (You may be wrong!) Caution should be exercised before blocking users who may be acting in good faith. Blocking to enforce a Wikiholiday or departure is specifically prohibited. Sysops also should not block themselves for testing unless ""autoblock"" is disabled, or the sysop is using a static IP, as the resulting autoblock may extend to other users.== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS ==== ALL WIKI MODS A LIMPED-DICKED LIBTARD COWARD FUCKBAGS V" +you stupied crack head u need to get a life and get off the computer you are probly some 300lbs 40y/o child molester +ha ha ha . ha ha ha ha ha . ha ha ha haha ??? a haa haa haha??????67.165.71.214 +Thanks Greetings Mikhailov, Thanks for the welcome and your generous suggestions! I particularly like the four waves and will incorporate that in my modus operandi. I wish I had more time to edit, although that is not my calling, yet I'd love to help. Here I am just trying to keep my two Cuba books (I'm the author) in the further reading sections... Yes, another self serving bastard. For me it is difficult to stay on top of this alone. I do have several questions that you certainly could answer, yet if you will is another matter entirely. 1) When there is no further reading section, should I A) create one or B) add the information in the reference section (I feel that may be a faux pas)or C) do something else like ... run Forrest run? 2) Unfortunately I have not had anyone write a bio for me... yet. I'm afraid I am responding at a poor time because while I usually dominate Google searches with my books, interviews, and my Blog at Sulekha, at the moment I am a distant second on the first page. Sadly, I share the name of Charles Spencer King with the inventor of the Range Rover.... This confuses many a seeker as you might imagine. Regrettably, Mr. King (the other) died in the last month, and that has thrown the proverbial monkey wrench into the rankings (Addendum: I assure you I am alive and well). I would love to at the very least get into the Disambiguation section, however I am afraid I would need a bio for that.... Am I correct? 3) For some reason my ISBN does not seem to work here despite the fact I am on everything from Amazon through the Library Thing....and everything between. Odd, yet I would be delighted if at the very least I could get this to go to either the individual page at Amazon or the title page ( this one:) http://www.amazon.com/Charles-Spencer-King/e/B002ELIWKI/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1 Thank you in advance for your valuable time and expertise. I look forward to our next adventure that undoubtedly is awaiting our attention. CSK (cubaking) +I declare that Zanhe stop undoing my edits. If Zanhe continues, he will be blocked from any more editing! +" Caps for Iran Again at it? Let's go step by step: 1 - according to NFT.com, he has 146 caps and 36 goals as of the ending of the 2015 AFC Asian Cup; 2 - RSSSF says he has 144/37 but that's not counting said competition, so he should have 148/37 after the tournament (Iran played four games there, he played all those), and FIFA (according also to the RSSSF web) says two of those games are not to be counted, even though the Iranian FA does so, so there you have, he has 146 (148-2), not the 149 that several ""users"" are giving him! I've altered the box, the only matter of discussion should now only be the goals, 36 or 37. Attentively 84.90.219.128 " +Pronounciation I came to this article today wondering how AUG is pronounced - whether you say each letter or you pronounce it as a word (awg). If there is a general rule or correct pronounciation this should be mentioned in the lead. +" Project Metroid IV Is it just me or is there a lot of useless information in this article? I have decided to create a ""project"" to try and remove all the information/facts/opinions that do not belong in an Encyclopedia. (that's what wikipedia is, remember that) If you do not like my changes, please just don't go edit it and start a edit war, please post your concerns here. If your edits are small or are actually relative I'll probably let it go. *Note: I'm not trying to ""take over"" this article, I just see it's in very poor shape and needs an update." +" and twinkle wont let me report my self >_> Gold Dragon " +Like you told me to assume good faith, and I took that as a passive verb (subject is object of verb) that you were telling me to assume good faith on my behalf, and I asked what you meant and you pretty much just repeated yourself. Obviously not saying you are insane, but it was an insane way of trying to communicate with me. I am also autistic which makes communication even harder. +Review the posts in the sections i deleted. They are filled with personal attacks etc. The BNP talk page is filled with biased anti-BNP posters, hence i wish to delete my posted sections - as nothing good came out of them, they only attracted biased posters to attack my views/or the BNP's. Would just help if those sections are deleted and everyone moves on. +": I did not agree the text in April. But I did undertake additional research, specifically going to each of the sources. The April text does not adequately cover the views of the authors cited. We most certainly cannot ""change"" the Speer - or Bullock, Toland Kershaw or Phayer quotes - to ""to suit many agendas"" as you suggest - on the contrary, we must accurately reflect 1) what they actually wrote 2) what our article says. You can add to the expanded text that one General once wrote in his diary that Hitler told him he was a Catholic if you like (with correct timing and attribution). It's doesn't cancel out everything else Hitler said and did. I will insert the new text under a new heading to get people engaged. " +Comment added by User:DHR1815 I think it a waste of everyone's time to get into the pros and cons of the British empire here we should just try to get a factually correct and NPOV article about Clive himself. Parts of this article (particularly the later part) are archaic and misleading. +Phil Donahue I know he was at WDTN during his talk show era, but I know that people stated he started at WHIO. My question, is, did he start on the radio side, or television side? I put his name in the notable alumni, presuming it was on the television side. Thank you. 71.64.155.216 +3RR warning Nice try, but I read and it was soundly rejected because it didn't come close to qualifying. Meanwhile, i've filed one in kind for the both of you as well as filed a WQA abusse report for the two of you. You both are ganging up against me and its unwarranted. +I have learned my lesson and will speak more calmly. Please unblock me, because my +Real Name Any ideas on this anyone? It's not on the CD sleeve. +" Definitely seems non-notable to me. What can be done about this? ~ T • C " +Roman Catholics i'm not accusing you but i think you're a fenian. You are ugly and probably the seventh born in a family. You have probably been molested at some point by a priest. You disgust me. SIEG HEIL! +":Kmarinas86's note: The first edit to the English Wikipedia article about Nayah was translated from the French Wikipedia article (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayah). The IP of the person responsible for the copyright violation is 92.135.202.206 which is an IP in Paris, France (geobytes.com). Thank you and have a blessed day.''''—Expert Sectioneer'' of Wikipedia86 = 19+9+14 + karma = 19+9+14 + talk " +" JTWC prognostic reasonings──Soala For expansions. (talk✉) 01 // 02 // 03 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 21 // 22 // 23 // 24" +Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. Repeatedly replacing warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops. I promise other distruption is stopped. You won't hear from me again. Thanks +" Greece an eastern culture? In what logic Greece is put into ""EASTERN CULTURES"" ? Based on geography, religion , cultural or racial isssues? I am waiting an answer. Why the term greek in anal sex is not considered by wikipedia a slur? The described reasons about having anal sex before wedding are relevant for muslims, not christians, if you have any sense of reality (and credibility) man, what are you talking about? greece is of course comparably eastern with respect to west europe.. its history is rooted in east, as a race greek nation is genetically similar to turks, and christianity does not mean the west automatically.. this is not the page to discuss where greece belongs.. and any sense of reality and credibility offers that anal sex is forbidden by majority of sects of all monotheistic religions.. don't try to reflect all christians are welcoming anal sex, while all muslims are completely against it, there are muslim sects who don't condone anal sex... Patently false statement For women, pleasure is derived from anal intercourse because the rectum shares a wall with the vagina and therefore shares some of the nerve endings associated with sexual pleasure. This is wrong anatomically and factually most women do not find anal sex pleasurable, according to surveys by Kinsey and others. Any statement to the contrary should be quantified somehow. The entire opening section of this article does not have a neutral POV. Rather, it verges on arguments in favor of anal sex and clearly favors a male's perspective. This seems to violate the official NPOV stance. Claiming that ""most women do not find it pleasurable"" is POV and unverifiable. What is verifiable is that heterosexual couples do indeed practice it (survey mentioned in 4th link below), and that some females find it pleasurable and can achieve orgasm. The presense of nerve endings in the areas described is also verifiable. It isn't really unverifiable, most women do not enjoy anal sex as is shown in consistent studies. Whether that is based on anatomical reasons or social reasons is not really important to whether or not it is a fact. It could be mentioned that most women do not enjoy anal sex, but some do. It should also be mentioned that many heterosexual couples do engage in anal sex (and if anyone doesn't understand how most women can dislike anal sex and then a large number of them can participate in it, they don't know very much about women). Let's see some of those ""consistent studies."" Talk If the wording is the main issue under debate, then why not simply say that women can find anal sex pleasurable, as opposed to categorically stating we do or don't, because that's more a matter of preference than anything else. GO TO: http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/?article=faq&refid;=125 ON ANAL SEX Read About the Dangers of Anal Sex. We probably shouldn't include statements so general such as ""women like/don't like"". It would be better to state that ""this agrees with the majority of women, as revealed by surveys"". New Evidence about Sodomy http://www.slate.com/id/2126643/ According to data released earlier this year by the Centers for Disease Control, the probability of HIV acquisition by the receptive partner in unprotected oral sex with an HIV carrier is one per 10,000 acts. In vaginal sex, it's 10 per 10,000 acts. In anal sex, it's 50 per 10,000 acts. Do the math. Oral sex is 10 times safer than vaginal sex. Anal sex is five times more dangerous than vaginal sex and 50 times more dangerous than oral sex. Other useful academic data is also available on the PDF link within the article. I don't think there has ever been any discension here that anal sex is a riskier activity then vaginal sex which is riskier then oral sex. This is a well accepted fact, supported by organisations like the WHO etc. However, this does not mean anal sex is bad or should be banned. If you claim otherwise then you should also support banning all sexual activity. Or hey why not just ban all contact between people? Nor does it mean people having anal sex are at more risk then people having vaginal sex. Someone having protected anal sex is likely to be at far lower risk then someone having unprotected vaginal and probably even oral sex. In fact, I wonder if a polygamic gay man wh +pps - has anyone questioned why this is a starter page? I have and when someone helps out by adding content they are discouraged. sham sham on all you who stand behing Blotto adrift and dont follow wikipedia guidelines. tis tis +Foxy Browns Birthday According to Foxy Browns MySpace Account, she is still 26 years old. So she was born on 1979. http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid;=63520254 +Removing neutrality template I think this article is very much neutral, so, there is no need for a disupted neutrality template. +01:11, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC) +" Statistics The source for proposed addition to this section is: 320. William Wilbanks, ""Frequency and Nature of Interracial Crimes,"" submitted for publication to the Justice Professional (November 7, 1990). Data derived from Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987, p. 53. PROPOSED ADDITION: Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it has become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant statistics. The FBI keeps very detailed national records on crime, but the way it presents rape data obscures the racial element rather than clarifies it. Dr. William Wilbanks, a criminologist at Florida International University, had to sift carefully through the data to find that in 1988 there were 9,406 cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape. [320]" +The events of 9/11 were also depicted in LEGO form and can be viewed on Youtube by searching '9/11 For Juniors!'. +Faith, Hope, and Love Clearly, men, women, and children have these three things. It is difficult to understand how these things are explained by Hawking and Darwin. So, I don't understand all the classifications on your user page. On another level, I do not understand how the Second Law of Thermodynamics (or mathematics or music) blew out of a vacuum singularity, went through three generations of stars, and then evloved into us, editing on WP, from primordial soup. Seems a bit unlikely ... Will you consider GDI as a slight possibility in your edits? +" Fair use rationale for Image:Losmejorescd.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Losmejorescd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +Have a good break and let me know when you return if I can help you with anything. 05:18, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) +" The Transhumanist    " +into the 'outside world' (e.g. outside of your bedroom) +. I've been very happyu with editors like A Quest for Knowledge and Gigs. Both seem to have a genuine search for truth and I wish we could rely on them to settle disagreements +P.S supremacist is a person who feels their race is superior to others not one who thinks other races apart from theirs are equal. Get a dictionary. Or maybe leave english behind and move to China to be with the super race. I'm sure they are all dying to take your place in the US. Like those in Hong Kong too now it isn't under the British. +When I am right, I insist that I am right. The first things that I did when I started editting Wikipedia are create an account and write a much-needed, will-written article. Wikipedia administrators responded by deleting my article and indefinitely blocking my account. I think that the actions speak for themselves. +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. \talk +RAINN exists? Would someone explain to me how we have an article on Rape that does not prominently mention the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network or it's hotline number? +amide why did u edit tha damn page? +" No sweat, I had the redlink ""watched"" because I knew you would start the article. You are doing fine there, good job. I'll just tidy up a bit when needed. As you may have seen I added it to the Google nav box, so it will probably get some more help over time. A screenshot would be really helpful, I don't suppose you have cloud print running do you? I only have Chromium 8 here right now. - " +Replaced it with the right template. +" User permissions I've had watchlisted for a little while, and I see now that you granted rollback. I don't object but suggest we keep a careful eye; something about a fixation with updating edit counts combined with rollback makes me just a little wary. It's probably nothing, but just thought I'd drop you a note (and I'm watching too).    talk  " +why delete Harrison House you prick? +There's usually nothing wrong with pointing someone twords and RfC involving something they were involved in (as they can often lend a helpful perspective on the situation), though it is considered bad ettiquite to suggest or recommend that they vote one way or another (it's preferred that they take a look at the page themselves and then judge). +" Many games are covered by independent reliable sources. That is what is needed, a lot of games have been featured in professional reviews or major gaming magazines. Also, if you see a game article on Wikipedia that you think is not notable, feel free to nominate it for deletion as well. comms☛ " +about English hey Athenean from turkey with Love also nice madals +"::Would you please re-read what you just wrote? In one sentence you say ""he acquired Canadian citizenship"", and in the next you say ""he is .. not Canadian"". " +Dude, quit putting comments on my page. +":Actually his edit about Sun Quan calling Pang Tong ugly was somewhat correct. In Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Pang Tong had an audience with Sun Quan, but Sun was pissed off by Pang's ugly appearance and arrogant attitude. Pang left Eastern Wu later and went to serve Liu Bei. contact me (聯絡) " +" ""Enoch"" and ""Levi"" seem prety jewish to me,dont take me wrong,im not a racist or anything,id just like to know if Lincoln's (both Levi and Abraham) ancestors were jewish or not,because ive never come across such information. " +Whatever, you don't get it, this person is creating a problem. I know my block expired yesterday I'm not a moron. Perhaps you can help me complain about the editor for their continuing actions on the Indonesia page +" Fascism You obviously are quite well read and skilled on this topic, but two Wikipedia policies need to be applied. 1) ""This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute. Please read this page and discuss substantial changes here before making them."" That is on top of the discussion page for a reason. 2) NPOV requires all majority and some minority views be covered in the entry in a proper balance. All the current editors have shown a willingness to discuss their different POVs and seek a consensus before making substantial edits. Please join us in this collaborative effort. " +Abey Gandu.. Wikipedian.. Salley how dare you delete all the pic's of my collection to Kolkata page. Harami.. 1st of all you don't put a pic. Then u try delete the pic's... Fuck u off.. gandu salla. +TFG, you are an idiot. I NEVER believed in Santa Claus and I used to go around to all the stupid kids in my 1st and 2nd-grade class and tell them Santa wasn't real. The teacher told me to stop but I didn't because I was smart and logical even at 7 years of age. If I could be logical at that age, any kid can, stupid parents like you are getting in the way of kids' developing their logic skills. From the time I first heard of Santa Claus when I was 4 years old I ALWAYS knew he was fictional. How come I knew it and yet you're saying children shouldn't find out? What if it's a smart and logical child like me who asks questions about the logical fallacies? you know, like I DID, because I'm SMART. +Listen now very clearfully to me you inuit18. This Persian and Britianic are not holy!! There are enough academic sources around the world with facts about him and his origin. You can read it very clearly why one is trying to destroy him and other to claim him. So, to the neutrality of these articles becomes doubts. You are really a brainwashed person. hahah so funny men, the books are not academic sources and articles in Persianica and Britianica are academic sources...? hahaha mashallah, i think you are the knowledged person of your family hahaha. if there was writed for example his birthplace as Asadabad, Kunar province, Afghanistan. I am sure, this brainwashed person would never ever accept it as academic sources. Think once men, two countries claims his origin and his remain are gived back to his originally country, and Britianica set his born place as one of the country (Which don't get his remains and would never get it). Don't you think once why has Britianica choice of this countries as his born place and not both. Is this not a little bite strange, don't you think so...? And about Perianica is very clearly to very one. No needs to makes my words dirty about this! So except from this brainwashed person inuit18, has any body any objection..?(Tofaan-توفان) +" Sweden= The legal actions taken by the Swedish royal family is according to the article in SvD not for his comments about Sweden in general, but for his comments about the royal family per se, and then especially his comments about princess Madeleine claiming she being indecent. Out of curiosity - does anyone know what these creatures (I won't have them in the same category as us humans) at WBC make of the United Nations? I can imagine they'll hate it, as they seem to hate everything in the universe, but it would be interesting to know... I completely agree with the guy above me, but as this is an encyclopedia, why do we have to start an article about a schurch off with ""hate group""? Perhaps because these are a group of people who rejoyce when thousands of children die in terrible tragedies and come to funerals to yell vial things at the loved ones of the people that fought for their rights. What the hell should we start it off with? This is a local church that has very good after-school programs? Hatred of Islam and muslims, however despicable, is not racism, and neither is hatred of Catholics or Catholicism. In general the racism section is pretty weak. There is plenty bad to be said about Phelps without bringing the allegation that he uses the word ""nigger."" Nice work. Much better. I removed the NPOV tag. This article could be accused of not quite attaining NPOV, but it is clear that the writers have made an attempt to see this ridiculous crusade from both sides that is nothing short of heroic. Patrick Beverley, 15 August 2005 Former Members of Westboro Baptist Church The article has been updated with the following: ""George Stutzman, Theresa Davis, Chris Davis, Karl Hockenbarger, Bill Hockenbarger and his wife, James Hockenbarger and Joshua Phelps-Roper are no longer members of the Westboro Baptist Church."" Where did this information come from? The Hockenbargers have been members of the church for a long time. I believe Chris Davis is married to Rebekah Phelps-Davis, one of Fred Phelps' children. His leaving the church would mean that he and Rebekah are no longer together. Joshua is one of the children of church spokesperson Shirley Phelps-Roper. His leaving would probably mean that he no longer has a relationship with his parents. (As Dorothea Bird once said: ""If you're in, you're in. If you're out, you're out.) Hate group Any chance of this article having a further early emphasis on it being a recognised hate group? Lies The westboro baptist CULT disgrace me. They hate catholics because they aparantly abuse children and are homosexuals. This is absolute lies and heavily offensive. The fact that they make up so much lies and how there actions are contradicted within the bible should be given more attention. Anyone agree? Appearance I remember an appearance by a woman and her children on the Howard Stern show... they were members of the Westboro Church, and in the few minutes I watched one thing that the woman said struck me as an interesting point: ""I don't hate fags, God hates fags,"" or something to that effect. And yes, Fred Phelps mentioned this subject in an April 2003 interview with BlackTable.com: (Here's the URL: - 08:56, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)) Article structure I started some sections to give the article more structure, and made other indicated changes. - 08:15, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) Comment On a similar note, should we change references to this group from ""church"" to ""organization?"" I understand the name is Westboro Baptist Church, however for accuracy sake they are not really a ""church."" This church praises dead Swedes A friend gave me this. Copy and paste this link in to your webbrowser otherwise it won't work http://data.4channel.org/p/src/1104484357896.gif I don't know of its validity. If somebody want to add this to the article, go ahead. If you can't download the image: It's basically a flier by the church that praises the presumed 2000 deaths of Swedes in the recent asian tsunami. As a Swedish citizen I find it highly offensive that goes beyond words, so it would be impossible for me to write an unbiased addition to the article regarding this. Thanks, 11:29, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC) ""Criticism"" section should be expanded further I added a bit to it +An interesting encodement. However, that German document is unsuitable in other ways as well. +" I wish I could clarify and relieve your doubts, I do. At this point it's no longer in my hands, because editors on the talk page appear to have decided that DiPi actually is a reliable source even though it contradicts other reliable sources. I don't know exactly where it will go from here, but it seems that the best solution will eventually be to use both well-sourced pronunciations in the information box. Either that or the present status quo will be kept. I don't know how it will turn out. And I thank you for responding and wish you well!  Paine  " +I think that if the vague tag is added, a citation needed tag should be added to encourage users to find a more clear content source. I hope you agree with that. Regards, +YOU GUYS ARE FUCKIN CRAZY YOU STUPID SHIT LICK YOUR OWN PIMPLY FAT UGLY BUM!!!! YOU ARE CRAZY YOU ALL GAYS AND FAGGOTS IF NOT MALE THAN LESBIAN I KNOW YOU GONNA DELETE ME OR DO YOUR STUPID BLOCK THING TO ME NOW BUT I DON'T CARE YOU ARE SINGLE AND HAVE THE WEIRDEST BOOBS OKAY I HATE YOU BITCHES! +Indeed, I started Glossary of Japanese history; this can be helpful in those unfamiliar with tons of terms in Japanese history. +page!!! how can i vandilize my own page?!?!?!? explain to me and don't hide behind those templates +Thank you for your corrections of Faddeeva function Thank you Steven! Very helpful corrections. I wrote that article because I actually will need an implementation for my own work and I wanted to get some overview; now I even got a link to the C code I had been looking for. +On behalf of all the staff at KLDK (and the pathetics), I would like to award you the seldom coveted Thumbs Up Award for catching a spelling mistake and making KLDK a better place to visit. +Oh, thank you, that's very nice ) Actually I'm quite a bit of an Emmelie-fan myself, that's why I regard it important to have this info in the article in a neutral way. I think the problem was an admin who is/was too eager to use the admin-powers, much too fond of WP:IAR, and hyped by too many unreflecting followers... +"Hello RHaworth: I always read and consider your comments carefully, and did so with your latest suggestions. I could not find instructions for creating the links that you suggested. Please direct me to such instructions, or I will try using other edit examples. I did not solicit comments from Eeekster because I could not find any record of him being familiar with space science. Considering the original research policy, all of the material in the proposed article has been published before in peer-reviewed journals and there is no original material there. As for a deletion review, it is recommended in the intructions there to settle the issue with the adminstrator first, and I am trying to do so such as not to bother them if possible. Regards 222.154.145.115 ""AbrahamDavidson"" " +Talk:Jerusalem Hi, I would appreciate it if you'll add your opinion here: Talk:Jerusalem#Better wording#We are running out of bits. +" That's pretty funny. I don't thing I've seen a single memo allowing editors to bite someone over spelling. I'm a proofreader and I can accept some people make spelling errors. Hell, I'm dyslexic too, so I make them myself. I'm so sorry Coldplay Expert can't match your exacting standards of perfection. However, I think that maybe, just maybe, you should lowering them a bit. Look in the mirror more closely instead of letting your eyes pass over the cracks in it. Sing your songThe bird's seeds " +And Wüstenfuchs claims not to be an ethno-nationalist, and THIS is how he spends his spare time? What's next, messuring skull sizes of Bosniaks against those of Croats and Serbs? Jesus Christ. +Okay... So editing my own userpage without being logged in is vandalism? Reverted by the time you read this. Pretender2j +And so, an advise becomes threat. This looks like a job for (please deposit payment in tuna). +Now since I am back after being banned for 96 hours, I too want to post on these very lines, because I have been subject to DBachman's nonsense and corrupt behaviour. DBachmann, you will win tolerance on wikipedia if you follow these instructions - 1) If you do NOT delete other people's posts and do not merge sections of talk-pages in order to dilute a discussion. This is childish behaviour and I'm sure that you are at least of voting age. 2) Accept your mistakes wherever and whenever applicable, instead of stubbornly adhering to them. It will only cause you further embarassment. 3) Do not mouth abuses when others point out your lack of knowledge. Patiently accept your mistakes and try to reach for a compromise. 4) Do not be stubborn and bicker over small issues. In short, be temperamental. +De-proding Where were you?... I've had lots of troubles with other editors who claim that IMDb is not a source, at least a good or a reliable one! They've even deleted Jaime Ann Allman's page because despite having about a dozen film participations the only source was IMDb!... +Don't forget to eat your cyanide tablets now that they found you. +Real funny keeping sum1 blocked so they cant vote. dont move this article and it needs a bunch of cleanup and a whole lot of stuff you removed put back including the thing from the pentagon. theres no concenss and whoever put up that infobox was lying. and im pissed about your bs removing my comments from here too +" I will think about what you said. I removed the name from the discussion because it was never about any particular individual, it was always all about ""coldplay."" Oh, and you should know that ""recognised"" is spelled incorrectly, it is spelled with a ""z."" " +Link to web.archive.org Does the link to http://web.archive.org/web/20110718034619/http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/09/06/history_of_the_rss_fork really makes sense for users? You have to wait first to get redirected. Is there any direct link we can add? +"Those are your opinions, to which you have a perfect right, and nothing more. The first reeks of academic snobbery. As Socrates pointed out some two and a half thousand years ago, appeals to authority are fallacious arguments employed by the weak-minded. You have a little bit of catch-up to do it would seem. That there is even such a thing as ""the concept of God generally"" is also your opinion and nothing more. I say you have just invented it without thinking firstly about whether it actually has any meaning whatsoever. " +" The earlier comment is correct, I would say, that the article suffers by only using images of APBT's. Using an image of another breed in addition would clarify that ""Pit Bull"" refers not to a specific breed but to a group. My preference would be to replace the second image on the page with the top image from the Bull Terrier page: [] because the profile makes it clear that it is a different breed. An appropriate caption would be ""An English Bull Terrier, another breed often termed 'pit bull.' "" " +Message You have message on my page AS> +{{unblock|reason= Apparently, the statement by Huckabee has been removed. Why am I being punished for what was obviously inappropriately added comments from Huckabee?THC Loadee +" The image falls into the fair-use category of the copyright exceptions. As much as you want to be a copyright cop, I have explained this to the other guy. Please read the guidelines. It says ""A photo from a press agency (e.g. AP), unless the photo itself is the subject of sourced commentary in the article"" is unacceptable. This provides an exception to the copy restriction. It makes sense, because HOW we can discuss the photo without seeing it. By spending so much effort to hide this very key controversial photo, you make yourself look very suspicious, either as the sympathizer of the terrorists or something worse. " +Yes, I just caught another half-dozen of his socks. +Another option may be to use some basic logic chips (or a PAL) to gate the SPI outputs so that only one chip at a time sees SPI activity even though the controller has only one SPI interface. +Well yeah pop rock sums Avril Lavigne up very well but I just didn't feel that songs like Complicated and I'm With You were best described simply as pop rock. I thought they also had a softer feel...maybe pop wasn't the best way to describe them but can you see where I'm coming from? If you think they cause too many problems thn feel free to remove them +Mark Warner Re your initial post here in fact there is no evidence that critics of the Mark Warner article are supporters of other political parties. This is Warner's invention. There were concerns that his original article was a vanity piece lacking credible sources. The concerns were legitimate, GreenJoe may have gone too far by suggesting the article be speedy deleted but there's no reason to assume he's a political partisan. Looking at the original article it's easy to see why an uninvolved person would dismiss it as advertising and promotional. +Congratulations Your harassment and persecution of has caused far more damage and far more widespread damage to Wikipedia than her highly localized abrasiveness aver could have. You make me sick to my stomach, whoever you are and whatever your motivations might be. You have caused an odious stench which will be impossible to erase. People have previously suggested that you do some real editing here rather than pursuing your campaign of ugliness; I disagree; I don't see how someone with your sensitivities, or lack thereof, could have any value to Wikipedia (or, for that matter, to the planet) at all. ∇∆∇∆ +" I agree there's a verifiable tale here, but there's at most no more than a paragraph's worth. That much can be handled in the main shipyard article, which is long on ship lists but short on actual text. I'll absolutely miss the crane - I live in Quincy Point myself and occasionally ride the harbor ferries - but the article would never survive an AfD challenge. " +" See the AN/I thread. Let's keep this discussion in one place. BLACKKITE " +Hey I have my part of the outline on what I thought I'd like to work on. It's considerably short since we are all combining our outlines together to make one complete final outline. My outline is tentative. I have to go to the library and see what I can find out about the topics I chose to write about. For the countries I chose, I picked them based on the cultures I figured I'd be able to find the most information about and which I though had strong family honor traditions and customs. But I'll post my part of the outline below: Family Honor 1.TABHistory a.Gender Roles b.Group Values 2.TABHonor within different Cultures a.Traditions i.TABAsia 1.China 2.Korea 3.Japan ii. Middle East iii.Africa b.How Honor is upheld in different cultures I've put some information on the website about the first two portions. Hopefully I can expand on them. If not it's a considerable amount of information. Let me know if this looks okay. +About my block You blocked me as I broked the 3rr on Makedonska Kamenica municipality article, but what with the others, they are constantly revertin the article, I pointed official data about the flag. Isn't wikipedia here to inform and give coorect data, or it is just the conformistic sugestion of some users? Please support me in the article, cose the flag I posted is the official one.Thanx 10:07, 23 may 2006 (UTC) +the long-term effects of Fluoxetine +" Oppose He was granted the name Hohenzollern without the ""von"" by the European courts. He may use the surname but not the title of Prince. As much as I disagree with the usage of the surname the courts prevail. Tim Foxworth " +" It's so easy you could do it yourself if you weren't just interested in harassment.: ""Some etymologists believe ""shyster"" is a derivative of Shakespeare’s character Shylock in The Merchant of Venice, used to describe a devious, scheming person of Jewish background who will try any scam in the book to make a buck. In 1895, Funk’s Standard Dictionary defined a shyster as ""a lawyer who practices in an unprofessional or tricky manner; especially one who haunts the prisons and lower courts to prey on petty criminals."" In Shakespeare’s play, other characters call Shylock a ""currish Jew"" whose ""desires are wolvish, bloody, starved, and ravenous""; he is accused of being ""the devil … in the likeness of a Jew."" "" 21:23, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)" +", 7 October 2012 (UTC) Actually, it is unquestionagbly mocking when someone comments about your being blocked, knowing that you cannot respond to them. Especially from an administrator. Why was ANY comment even necessary once I was already blocked, especially from the involved editor/admin who asked you to do it? I never said or even implied that everyone else was at fault; I apologized multiple times for sounding too harsh with the editor who's been adding the questionable content. Beyond that, my primary goal was to get this massive problem solved; massive because of how many articles are involved. I am in no way alone in my feelings on this issue. The large number of editors who have reverted the editor over the past four years is clear evidence of the objections. And now, Dennis is finally acknowledging that I am right on the content issue. He could have, and should have, just said that from the beginning so the other editor would hear it from someone who is very experienced about what is and isn't appropriate. Then we could've proceeded in an appropriate manner to ""fix"" the problem in the many articles involved. This is why I wrote to admin Mark Arsten in the first place. 76.189.121.57 15:34" +If this page didn't exist, I would have had to create it. +" Okay, leave it with me.  :  Chat  " +" Neutrality tag The tagged section is not only neutral, it is primary verification of what JfJ claim to believe. It would be very odd indeed if the communism article did not reference communist sources for what communists believe. The section states what JfJ believe, it makes no claims about what Wiki believes, nor what the editor who put it there believes, nor what a reader should believe. It is therefore an verifiable NPOV reporting of a group that is itself obviously not neutral. My reading of this article is that although technically neutral in its presentation, it starts by presenting all the negative views of JfJ. That does not seem logical. A neutral reader wants to know firstly what JfJ believe, then what others say, neutral, pro and con. Example: Jane Doe's netball team's mission statement says, ""Play quality netball ..."" The Netball League recently described the team as ""dedicated, but lacking experience"" The Fan Club web-site features team captain Jane, praising her creative and inspiring ... Their main rivals have claimed that the team uses unsporting methods, like sledging ... I'm sure people understand the point. " +" I agree copyright requirements should be complied with. I removed your tagging of photos at Bray Hill article and at another one, because the photos appear to me to be okay to use, and also because the template you applied to them appears to be for text that is copied, not for photos. About the rest of what you say, i don't understand some of it and I don't know if I'd agree or not with your views. But the comments are not about copyright status of photos. If you continue to believe there are copyright violations for photos, please find out how to report them properly and make your case somewhere that they are copyvios. Sincerely, ncram " +You're Invited Come on over - [Dematts ChiroPractice page] +" I really can't belive that I have been banned FOR A WHOLE WEEK for a ""personal attack"" that consisted of two words which were a reversal of a username. It was, perhaps, a mild insult but to call it a ""personal attack"" is enough for me to sue you in an English court for deformation. " +Thanks for your comment at my Talk ... but this is a deadly serious matter, and you know how far off the rails ANI can go. So if you want to comment, I'd appreciate your reading and make up your own mind. +" Why don't we try to resolve this issue on this talk page, rather than going back and forth with edit wars? I believe a specific age range should be in the lead, and there seems to be more or less a concensus that 1965 is the most used first year. I don't think there is any ambiguity about this...whether we agree or not (and I don't happen to agree that 1965 is the first year), I don't think there is any question that 1965 is the most widely used beginning yr for X. Also, Generation Jones is certainly relevant to this. It's not that Wiki editors have to ""face the claim that a Generation Jones exists"", as you say. There is no question that many credible sources do believe that Generation Jones does exist, and especially with its accelerated emergence recently, it should be included in any discussion of the birth years of GenX, since it is directly relevant. " +" Hello, DanielBurke, and welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some pages that will help you to find your way around, understand key policies and guidelines, and develop your contributions: help and information contributing to articles policies and guidelinesfrequently asked questions where to ask a question wikipedia's community learn from others department directory editor's indexhow to edit a page how to develop an article manual of style notability verifiability no original researchour five pillars index of policies index of guidelines etiquette about your user page deletion policy Please sign your name whenever you leave a comment by using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the date. Whenever you edit a page, even if the edit is minor, you should include a descriptive edit summary. If you need help, visit the help desk, or place {{helpme}} and a question on your talk page and someone will respond shortly. If you would like mentoring, you can join the adopt-a-user project. I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia and find it a rewarding experience. ··coelacan " +" hahah candied asses. but seriously, you should use the medical term for ""vagina,"" which is ""fat cunt""" +I have removed the Category:Lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender people tag from this article. The article only maintains that Yusipov was allegedly homosexual. This tag should only be added to individuals who were indisputedly homosexual. If someone has notations, then fine, but I don't think it should be added until then. +Try and remember dude, this edit . An editor does not have to assume good faith when presented with evidence otherwise. +why am I Blocked ? can i be un blocked please and somebody help me please +" saddle Nyttend, I do not understand your reversion of the edits I made on Saddle, the type of references I removed are clearly not valid for use on Wikipedia and I confirmed this on the appropriate notice board, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123, these edits are clearly not ""vandalism"", can you explain your decision to allow these references to remain in use as I am confused here. Some of the references seem to be commercial web sites with un-referenced information being used as Wikipedia references, this is certainly not appropriate as far as I know, thanks " +" loudspeakers Hi. A reliable source has been added on London Muslim Centre. '''''' talk " +Plebisite Project I think you were a big hasty with your deletion of Plebisite Project. 12:09, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) +May 2011 (UTC) Done. I removed it. However Ganas describes itself as, or if they promote open communication or not (much less succeed), is not something quantifiable 21:32, 28 +" Too many templates There are an insane amount of templates on this page. For such an important article, the ""Eurovision Song Context"" is hardly notable. _Monitor " +Wikipedia:No personal attacks Personal attacks are unwelcome on Wikipedia. It's harder to think of a more vile personal attack than stating someone is part of a murder conspiracy, as you did in your comment to this revision to Talk:Yigal Amir. Please keep this in mind when editing. ∇∆∇∆ +How did you let yourself get so fat and out of shape shameful. just shameful. +" Hello Hello Longhair, I need your assistance on an article Ford BA Falcon please of you can could you complete one of the following points: Copy/edit Add information Review article Nominate article for Good Article status If you have any questions just go to my talk page. Talk | Contribs " +LOL Nevermind being mere sophistry, that's not even good sophistry. SOME of the RS's are about registration directly and mention AWA indirectly. SOME are about AWA directly. That SOME are indirect is not at all an argument to exclude all direct and indirect RS's. That you continue to provide NO RS returns us to the same point yet again. I can only repeat: Present whatever RS's you like, direct, indirect, and otherwise, and I will be happy to support their inclusion on the mainpage. As for me, I am known most for my research in neuroscience, hardly a soft science in anyone's book. That you again refer specifically to me personally (and to my profession) rather than to any RS or policy is, of course, what makes your comments personal attacks rather than good editing. +You guys have a lot of balls whining about WP transgressions after the displays of lack of respect for these policies yourselves! Man WP displays it's ignorance and bias for a few childish editors in these examples. Compete hoax. The idiots pushing allthe rules cry realquick when the same techniques are spouted towards them. +For Husky Please stop trying to dictate what can and can not be on my own talk page. It is my talk page and nothing I have added or removed violates any rules at WP. Take your gustapo tactics elsewhere please. Thank you! +Regarding your edits to Airport I am glad to see that your class project is interested in expanding upon Wikipedia. However, please note that bylines are not be included in Wikipedia articles and it is not necessary for your class to note that they are working on a project. Please have your instructor read Wikipedia's guideline on school projects. Thank you. +" This denial is completely untrue, and designed to mislead you. He rated me a ""6 or a 7 on the Britol Stool Chart"". Now will you permit me to rate him on it, now and here? If you do it will clear the place in my mind of his very foul odor. I have asked him to apologize. But he seems to refuse to do so. Instead he is vindictive towards. He now has launched a compaign of personally attacking as someone who goes around calling other editors ""Antisemites"" I believe that the major ""disruptor"" is Mel Etitis. The others (and I'm not naming them) are all under his control. It is I who have been the victim of personalattacks from the very beginning. I think you should consider whether Mel should suffer a Community Ban. If you re-examine the evidence, you would agree. " +That's riduclous. He removes a source and its content. +Sidenote: Xizer is not a racist. Calling this guy a nigger was just funny though. lol +Please Don't delete my comments on a talk page. +re: Autism Speaks Everybody's doing it! Ahh..relief]] +Do these policies extend beyond the article(s) and their talk pages to user pages as well? Or are user talk pages free mans land? +That was on there back in March. A second banner was added in June and immediately removed, and that is the one I was referring to. Even if he was not notable in March, he's since been the home run derby winner and the starting first baseman at the FSL all star game. How can a vote held before the season even started be enforced the day after he wins the home run derby? Something about this just doesn't seem right. +Yawn*. Go tell Tiamut to remove all her anti-Israeli rhetoric from their page then. And what, questioning the morality of Muhammad is wrong? What about the Criticism of Muhammad article? You have absolutely no leg to stand on. I am allowed my opinion on one of histories many tyrants, religious prophet or not. And it isn't effecting my editing - have you checked my edit history? o.O I never get involved with any of this stuff. +Response So I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but it looks like you're adding the tags not because of the the article needing a cleanup and reorganizing but just because the color scheme of the column boxes are not the color scheme of original boxes and are matching the Roc Nation colors and of the logo. That is just plain out bias it not my fault that other people do not do this when creating a record label singles discography, which they can and you have not seen one with a color scheme on them. All I have done is put the 3 basic colors Black, Red and White of Roc Nation on a original Wikipedia column to distinguish it from other record label singles discography and the other names of the artists that are on the article, because the article would grow as those and more artist release more singles and songs, which makes it appropriate and not inappropriate as you have stated for you reason of adding cleanup/reorganize tags. Once again all I did is add 3 basic colors to the original columns Black, Red and White which anybody can do on any other record label discographies on Wikipedia, but I may have been the first to do this new color scheme styling of a record label singles discography that does not mean you just add tags that are not meant to be on a specific article that is formatted, organized and written like any other record label singles discographies on Wikipedia and is fully verified. There is no Wikipedia rule that says this is not justified for a record label singles discography except for you , I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but this just plain bias, which Wikipedia does not condone from established editors or administrators. +Umm...because they are important claims from both sides. I think I may be missing something from your question. +". Even when the meaning remains clear, such sentences can sound clumsy or overpacked (""He gave an impassioned speech on the state of the public parks, in which he made it clear that more investment was needed"")" +I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE NIGGERS AND SPICS AND JEWS AND MINORITIES I FUCKING HATE N +I assume you sniff your own farts. +" Wikipedia Cleanup Cleaned up and wikified, completed Ben Hur's name to Judah Ben Hur per (IMDB) cast listing and removed the word exciting from first sentence to make NPOV.Dakota ~ ° " +No. But the less famous Arbuthnot families are also all well recorded (a project made possible by the rarity of the name) and it seems most improbable that the road was named after one of them. - +" Well I know Cat personally and I have met and drank beer with him; yet I think TheFEARgod is right on this issue. Dear Cat, dear friend; TheFEARGod isn't an enemy; he is an extremely knowledgeable person on battles. Sometimes he needs more information just like anybody else; but I don't believe he is trying to side with anyone. So please; ""chill out bro"" ) " +Have a look at your talk page. -.- — (Talk) +Yeah, but you can delete whatever you like, you fascist. Great way to alienate people. +Certainly! I will give it a look this afternoon. I'm not sure if you could place my copyediting abilities on the same as level as Eric's, though.- +" Nice try, but no. That's a misapplication of the section of the WP:BLP policy you've quoted, and a distortion of my statements. It's in the cases where an article or biography of a person has been created that the WP:BLP People who are relatively unknown comes into play. If you think any article violates that policy, please give me the specifics immediately so it can be addressed. In the meantime, I suggest you concentrate on finding consensus for a list of alumni to be added to the article, and not continue to focus on whether each one of them has to have their own article to be included in that list- that's the point I was making. † " +Page moved for now Hello ShehanD, I moved the page to , where there are good people who can help you. — +" As it's not ""your"" article, you're under no obligation to ""fix"" anything. Anyone can edit, anyone can tag, anyone can contribute at any level they seem fit. Tagging is not time wasting, it is a part of the wiki-system, designed, developed and implemented by the community and therefore by WP:consensus. Your little rant won't change that so don't bother using CAPS to apply emotion where no feelings exist. It's not your article to play ""mommy"" or ""servant"" to, unwatch it if bothers you so. Wiki is the site ""anyone can edit"", I use an IP as much as whores use condoms, to protect myself from the diseases regular editors spread, and because I'm WP:HUMAN. So much WP:Ownership expressed in one reply, for one poorly-managed article, so pitiful... so much lack of WP:AGF, even more pitiful. I don't want you to waste your breath, if it smells as noxious as your attitude it could be fatal to humanity. I DGAF what you personally think of me, IPs or tags, you're not even admin-material, what you say isn't worth spit, you'll just have to concede to that fact that the tags I placed are within reason, non-controversial, and need attending to and that you lack the manners, diligence and respect to recognise that fact, hence your self-important imperialistic and bitey response. Merry Christmas, I'll send you a toothbrush and then you can talk about my ass some more. Ta-ta! xxx 82.8.252.13 " +" Here is Lavergne, making the ""worst mass murder in American history"" claim - from his own mouth, (start 7:00 minutes) []. As to the Gunby death, there are many possible reasons the coroner ruled it as a homocide, that are only known to the coroner. The fact that Gunby decided to stop treatment, that could have prolonged his life, sounds like suicide. However, I've addressed that here on this talk page, and also mentioned it would not be pursued any further. I do not feel, nor ever said any conspiracies were involved, I merely question the length of life and time after the shooting. I feel bad for Mr. Gunby and his families loss. As to Lavergne, read here what he says about where Whitman would be at the time Lavergne wrote this (last sentence) []. Now look up glioblastoma muti-forme grade IV brain tumor, and look at the prognosis - how could Whitman be alive as of 2006 (my best guess for when Lavergne wrote the ""Why"" article), and/or survived a lengthy trial? No, I do not have his book, but I read enough of it in Austin when it first came out, to know there was something was wrong, because he and I had access to the all of the FBI, APD and Whitman's diaries. I have all of the files and lot of the photos (I don't know if Lavergne does), plus audio interviews with Whitman's victims, professors and friends. A few of the photos in the Whitman article are mine. I represented Houston McCoy and Jeannie Speed, the widow of slain officer Billy Speed. But I realize that makes me have a WP:COI (except for the photos that others say should stay). So I have given you enough to consider, and I will return to my self-imposed ban. You forced me out, with your allegations and characterizations. You have Lavergne's book, I'm sure he will autograph it for you. Best of luck to you.2001:558:6007:27:7992:7DA3:D702:EE6A " +Actually You seems to be over smart.No one is supporting your POV on Barelvi Article and You are consistently inserting your unverifiable allegations in to the Article.You have regularly vandalized that Article.It seems You have certain Wahabi agenda to do so.You msut STOP from inserting your Non neutral ,Unverifiable allegations.Moreover there is totally consensus on the previous version since long.Thank. +I'm giving up on this one. Wikipedia not only censors its articles, but it removes comments. Happy truthiness, Wikipedia. What a joke you are. +You tell me how that is rational neutrality to make such comparison? +Contemporary Christian music Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Kim_Jones_at_About.com_on_Christian_music +" Juicy Girl Art. 134 of the UCMJ seems to be a very general article indeed. I think you'd have to prove / cite specific evidence to show that paying a bar fine is a direct contravention of that rule. If it's inside knowledge in the military that this is the case then it isn't in the general population, I was a teacher and therefore AFN viewer in Korea hence my interest in this topic and laymans knowledge about UCMJ. Nice one, talk " +Dennis Stamp Article I see that you deleted this article back in September. How do I go about bringing it back to life? Dennis was actually a fairly notable wrestler in Texas and Florida in the 70's. He held numerous (10) N.W.A. championships and was even featured in Sylvester Stallone's movie Paradise Alley in 1978. Because of his somewhat dubious appearance in Beyond the Mat in the late 90's he has gained a bad rap as fancruft, but I think he is really a valid notable part of wrestling history from the 70's in the South. Please advise. Thanks. +NO. IT is clearly less notable than St. Barnabas Elementary School (Kentucky). Why hasn't Fred Borsch been deleted yet? +, and my subsequent post was specifically in response to that. The request by Erikeltic for this block is simply an attempt to stifle any and all dissenting opinions. +REDIRECT Talk:Liberty Charter High School (La Mesa, California) +Nowadays we're living longer, so we need more money than previous generations once did. That's why many people choose to enhance their State entitlement through a scheme set up by their employer, or with a personal pension. The money is invested by their pension provider on their behalf with the aim of building up a more substantial sum for retirement. Tax advantages: For every £1 you put in, the Government adds 22p (for the 2006/07 tax year) for basic–rate taxpayers. Higher-rate taxpayers can also re-claim an additional 18p (for every £1) via their tax return. If you're offered a company scheme you may be able to benefit from your employer's payments. Pensions invest in different types of investments, including investments based on stocks and shares, which carry different levels of risk. The value of your investment can fall as well as rise and you may get back less then you pay in. If you have a personal pension but stop paying into it, you could actually lose much of whatever you've already paid. For example by stopping paying into your fund, the charges may reduce your fund, meaning you could lose out when you retire. 3 Simple Steps to Starting a Pension Account You decide to save for retirement with a personal pension plan You choose a provider, type of pension and the age you would like to retire at. You begin making payments: These payments, up to 100% of your relevant UK earnings, will receive tax relief, normally at your highest rate. +" Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gord.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Gord.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (talk) (email) (Contr.) " +Just one more thing. Yesterday I removed my nomination for DYK, but today I renominated the article to DYK once again. If you feel as declining the article once again, I guess you need to repeat your decline one more time. +(UTC) It's not an appeal to authority. Appeal to authority only applies when you're using unqualified authorities to back up an argument, like using the opinion of a cardiologist on a matter of urology. This is an appeal to expert testimony (qualified experts), which is perfectly valid. 6 July 2005 17:54 +No it was neil Armstrong, women haven't went to space until a few years ago! (Unless you count the Soviet program but they never took a Women to the moon). Elven6 July UTC +Unfortunately that article seems to be available only from paid websites at which I don't have a subscription, can you give a brief quotation of the part relevant to this naming discussion? +Again some dispute that: +"Infact they are listed as freedom fighters on Wikipedia itself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_fighters_of_India#Rebellion_of_1857 Since I have voluntarily agreed not to edit India-related articles for 3 months, my guess is this is going to be the next page on which you will want to correct to a ""NPOV"". " +—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 11:02, 23 October 2007 +Sealand I don't see why including Sealing is making fun of the wikipedia. After all, it is not legally recognised as a state, but neither the UK nor the UN have done anything to stop Sealand acting a fiscal paradise. Theoretically, the Vatican State could also apply to join the EU. Is that funny too? +" Grizzlygus1 - I believe criticism sections are almost always going to be inappropriate in Wikipedia. Just about everyone has somebody who disagrees with them about something. Some, like outspoken atheists, will have more than many from conservative religious parts of society who disagree. That's a given. We cannot possibly list all the criticism, so what's the point of listing any? We should just describe what's significant about someone (i.e. why they have an article here) and let others decide on the merits of their actions and views. The same goes for people significant for their strong religious views. List those views, and let it stand. Going any further will inevitably create the debate of ""how much further?"" So, no criticism sections. OK? " +I picked up the name Kurt Adkins somewhere in wickopedia but i cannot remember where - but who cares - if i am wrong in a discussion then no harm and certainly no harrassment had been caused -unless there are larger issues that you cannot disclose. +Multiple blankings of sourced material There have been multiple recent blankings and changes of name on Sterling's main page without giving any reason. +No indeterminates in the reals? Of course there are indeterminates in the real numbers - can you provide a complete representation in *any* number system for those numbers we call irrational? The answer is no. Even if it were possible for 0.999... to equal 1, it breaks the decimal system as it was intended since its invention. Do you agree that not all real numbers can be represented in a radix system? If yes, why would you insist on having a cauchy sequence define a number? Just because you can list the first few terms says nothing about the limit. For example, you can provide a Cauchy sequence that 'represents' pi but you cannot find its limit. There are several contradictions in this branch of 'analysis' - All Cauchy sequences must have limits but you cannot find the actual limit of 'most' Cauchy sequences that represent the majority of real numbers you cannot represent completely. I am not calling you an idiot but I am glad that you think you are an idiot. It's the first step to enlightment. Am I logamath? Nope. Not logamath but I am the so-called 'troll' most of your wiki math gods hate. I have the most extreme disdain for Michael Hardy, Krmsq(close runner up bum), Melchoir and small fry like Meni Rosenfield in this order. The rest of you are all pawns who have to support their 'view' of the math-world. In the dark ages, we had the leaders of the church who supported only their conception of the universe until someone smart came along and proved them to be all idiots who were hindering the progress of mankind. Likewise, Wikipedia will 'fail'. Hail Knol!! Knowledgeable individuals will be able to post without fools like you trampling all over their pearls. No one on Wikipedia is qualified to edit my work. You first have to know what I know and then you can speak to me on my level. As arrogant as this sounds, Hardy and company are bishops of the math church whose founders were exceptional fools like Cauchy, Weierstrass and the rest who I don't care to mention. 98.195.24.26 +Jed's talk page I will delete my talk page anytime I feel like it, as I have done several times in the past. I do not wish to hear your views on this matter, or any other. I will probably delete any message you post on my talk page, so don't bother posting one. +":The phrase ""large number"" seems at best exaggerated, especially as a) the given source does not cite a number of Bosnian and/or Muslim participants at all, describing them and their activities only in vague ominous terms; and b) the source, Icon of Evil: Hitler's Mufti and the Rise of Radical Islam (ISBN 9781412810777), appears almost egregiously slanted and unworthy for use on Wikipedia. I think it may be valid to include information about Bosnian volunteers and their mobilization by this particular Mufti, but it needs to be sourced from elsewhere and worded more carefully. Having studied the Einsatzgruppen, especially Einsatzgruppe D, more than the average self-educator could begin to consider enduring, and having never before seen this source or this ""information"" (more of an accusation really), I find the tone of the whole assertion and citation highly problematic. " +, nothing actually supports it +All I know is that corolla should have been a redirection to the car it is a great car! I owned one and to this day wish that I had not destroyed the interior by driving too fast down the dirt roads; so it is really not a prejudicial opinion. I was working with what was here. The new stuff on the page is simply incredibly interesting almost ancient history stuff I found while looking for something else. It is too bad that it is too late to name the web stuff here 'wikiplinya' because there is a huge similarity.... +Two issues There are two items at the bottom of the article that should be removed. First, there is a terrorism portal. Also, there is a Google mapping template that only maps two points. Thanks. +Weirdly, out of thousands of Valencia photos I have, I can't seem to find a single one of the Avenue itself which could be used. I have ones of me or various other people, especially near the football stadium, but I can't even trim those enough to be useful. I should be there later in the year or could get someone to do it, but it might take a while. +We are discussing Elhaik's appropriateness at this juncture, are we not? +Well PKtm, I am perfectly willing to have a civil discussion on it as I feel we are doing. All of my past reverts have contained this information from Lostpedia. The information is not solely from that site, it is also from this one. I have created a solution to this discussion. The wonderful thing about Wikipedia is that these changes can always be removed if a concensus is not reached. As the current concensus is at a stalemate I have taken the appropriate actions. I am in discussions with regards to the possible copyright infringement, but seeing as Lostpedia currently has no copyright guidelines, I agree this may take some time. I apologise if you feel that this solution is creating more problems but it was not my intention to create them. However, I feel that my creation of this new page is an amecable solution with regards to both points of the current discussion - +REDIRECT Talk:DNA repair protein XRCC4 +I say leave till the episode airs or we have direct confirmation. +I protest! Well now I experienced my first Cyber facist, and it looks like its a Swede??? Where should I protest? +" I am not going to keep redoing this over and over again ad nauseum. The post I linked is a DragonRealms GameMaster giving an announcement about Aesrela Everild. On the DragonRealms play.net page, Aesrela Everild was changed under spells. The problem Elonka that some leeway needs to be fostered because (i) this is a MUD which all of the information is transmitted via electronic text and (ii) other games' pages like City of Heroes, Medievia, and World of Warcraft all use the same synthesis of information. If you are emboldened in change it, please go to these entries and edit them as well. You won't because, i think, you are ""unforgiving"" on this discussion because you work for Simutronics as per your talk page. Your editing comes off as blatant nepotism. There is nothing on the criticism section that comes off as mean-spirited or anything but a neutral tone. Please see criticism sections for other games to get a good feel on how criticisms on games like DragonRealms is done: World of Warcraft, Medievia, and City of Heroes. " +"==Notability of Raynegamer== A tag has been placed on Raynegamer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +" Berkley High School Vandalism warning???? I was undoing (using the undo button) other's vandalism of adding ""notable alumni"" Remove this warning at once please" +Did you acutally say this? Someone less patient and understanding than myself probably wouldn't bother. Now I have seen everything. +Go ahead and block the IP, cocksucker, I could care less. I don't live in this shitty little country and it seems to me that half the country uses CAT, so go ahead. You pandering git. +big or small, could the main article be made a little bit more accurate? If Camino has evolved from Chimera - a small, lightweight webbrowser - is there any way it could be described in terms of its size, say, in bytes? Just how big of a browser is Camino, anyway? Is it just a few megs in size? Or is it perhaps much smaller? 198.177.27.17 +I've cleaned up the to do list. All that information isn't needed for this list. +I am tired of the pestilent voice of your sirens. Truly, I never imagined, and at the same time was shocked, to see how deeply you still cling to your errors. May I suggest you review your talk page and adhere to said previous request to refrain your incorrect posts and reverting of past removed information. +''' on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! +new article: René Moncada Hi there Mabdul, thanks for your recent assistance cleaning up my I AM THE BEST ARTIST Rene revision; long-time-no-see! I've just gone public with the related new article René Moncada and I'd like to ask for your help: I will next submit it to DYK, and knowing what I went through for the initial IATBA article I may need some support backing the nomination! At your convenience please do check it out and help keep an eye on it? Thanks friend! +That's an excellent question. Why would scientists in other professions urge scientific standards in fields other than their own? It's simple. Scientists do specialize, but the scientific method is applied to all branches of science. Urging people to apply scientific methods to all branches of science is part of the overall objective of the scientific community. Similarly, if I were a journalist specializing in one beat, I'd nevertheless want to urge all would-be journalists to employ ethical standards of journalism in any other beat. There may be some disciplines where the public has a strong interest in the subject, and a lot of ink appears on the subject, including some doubtful ink. Scientists or journalists in unrelated fields would naturally feel the need to urge appropriate tools of science or journalism, so as to avoid the kind of mistakes that have plagued human civilizations since the dawn of recorded history. Urging people to examine the evidence for (or against) some theory with a skeptical eye is simply sound advice, regardless of the subject. The dissent is not against any theory. The dissent is against sloppy methods for establishing which theories are viable, and how we can be so sure of what we claim to believe. +still waiting for your proof that alice cooper shys away from speaking about his faith. +" Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Hi, I've removed ""LLC"" from the title of your new article about this company per Wikipedia's relevant naming conventions. I've also done other dastardly things to it (see the edit summaries). ''''''87 " +What the problem is is that kids may be researching on school computers, perhaps with a teacher over their shoulder, and what will the school think of Wikipedia then? Just not right. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if this caused some controversy in other areas of media. Even Uncyclopedia has a parody article of it already- +Molecular vibration Thanks for the link. I had missed this article. It probably needs more links to it. Just one small point: expressing normal coordinates in terms of Cartesian coordinates is of very little value (except perhaps for creating animations!?), particularly as the force-field is usually expressed in terms of internal coordinates. +}} {{ WAP assignment | course = Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Interdisciplinary Application of Biology (Candace Timpte) | university = Georgia Gwinnett College | term = 2012 Q1 | project = +Nguyễn Dynasty Stop massive removing on the page Nguyễn Dynasty. You blanked too much others' edits. +No, the credibility of Wikipedia fails when individuals such as yourself dig their roots into the system and attempt to dominate it; make no mistake about that. Just go and do whatever you want, because I know editors such as yourself essentially thrive off their influence of Wikipedia. Most folk don't have the time nor inclination to come in and revert edits and quote all the POV, DONOHARM, hada hada nonsense. So, by all means, censor the truth all you want it is certainly impressive to call a Los Angeles Court record a poor citation. Also, keeping a minor celebrities real name secret like this, is pretty laughable. There is no harm what-so-ever in her name being known. +Yeah? Fuck you. There are fascists all over that Euromaidan movement. Just check the ideology that guides most political parties involved in it, you fuck. ~~ User:Guto2003 +Website Hello. http://lib.jxtcmi.com/ Is that site okay? +53, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 21: +Good LRT-1 section got good but LRT-1 never relay LNTV3 at any time (excepts the important life shows) LRT-1 section is better to be its own article. It's the diferent network.125.25.28.158 +" (UTC) The current published orbital periods of Neptune, Pluto, Haumea and Makemake are 165, 248, 285 and 310 years respectively. These suggest a ""resonance"" of 40 60 69 75, making the Makemake - Neptune ""resonance"" closer to 15 8 than to 11 6. 14:48, 29 March 2009" +2010 (UTC) The accusations of antisemitism are wholly without basis in fact and they've been thoroughly discredited by responsible historians. T 13:20, 2 February +" References i don't like deleting other people's work, so i put the list of references here, it is way too long. Ausserer, A. (1871a): Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Arachniden-Familie der Territelariae Thorell (Mygalidae Autor).Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 21: 117-224. Bertkau, P. (1880a): Verzeichniss der von Prof. Ed. van Beneden auf seiner im Auftrage der Belgischen Regierung unternommen wissenschaftlichen Reise nach Brasilien und La Plata im Jahren 1872-73 gensammelten Arachniden.Mem. Cour. Acad. Belg. 43: 1-120. Bond, Jason E. (1994): Seta-Spigot homology and silk production in first instar Antrodiaetus unicolor spiderlings (Araneae: Antrodiaetidae).J. Arachnol. 22: 19-22. Bücherl, W. (1957): Sôbre a importância dos bulbos copuladores e das apófises tibiais dos machos na sistemática das aranhas caranguejeiras (Orthognatha).Anais Acad. bras. Cienc. 29: 377-416. Bücherl, W., a Timotheo Da Costa & S. Lucas (1971): Revisão de alguns tipos de aranhas caranguejeiras (Orthognatha) estabelecidos por Candido de Mello-Leitão e depositados no Museu Nacional do Rio.Mems Inst. Butantan 35: 117-138. Cambridge, F. O. P.- (1896): On the Theraphosidae of the lower Amazons: being an account of the new genera and species of this group of spiders discovered during the expedition of the steamship ""Faraday"" up the river Amazons.Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1896: 716-766. Caporiacco, L. Di. (1947a): Diagnosi preliminari de specie nuove di aracnidi della Guiana Brittanica raccolte dai professori Beccari e Romiti.Monitore zool. ital. 56: 20-34. Chamberlin, R. V. (1916): Results of the Yale Peruvian Expedition of 1911. The Arachnida.Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harvard 60: 177-299. Coyle, F. A. (1984): A revision of the African mygalomorph spider genus Allothele (Araneae, Dipluridae).Am. Mus. Novit. 2794: 1-20. Coyle, F. A. (1986): Chilehexops, a new funnelweb mygalomorph spider genus from Chile (Araneae, Dipluridae).Am. Mus. Novit. 2860: 1-10. Coyle, F. A. (1988): A revision of the American funnel-web mygalomorph spider genus Euagrus (Araneae, Dipluridae).Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 187: 203-292. Coyle, F. A., T. C. O'shields (1990): Courtship and mating behavior of Thelechoris karschi (Araneae, Dipluridae), an African funnelweb spider.J. Arachnol. 18: 281-296. Coyle, F. A., T. E. Meigs (1990): Two new species of Ischnothele funnelweb spiders (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Dipluridae) from Jamaica.J. Arachnol. 18: 95-111. Coyle, Frederick A., O'shields, Theresa C . & Perlmutter, Daniel G . (1991): Observations on the behavior of the kleptoparasitic spider, Mysmenopsis furtiva (Araneae, Mysmenidae).J. Arachnol. 19: 62-66. Coyle, F. A. (1995): A revision of the funnelweb mygalomorph spider subfamily Ischnothelinae (Araneae, Dipluridae).Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 226: 1-133. Dörr, Tobias, Andreas Halbig and John Osmani (2006): Auf Vogelspinnensuche in Costa Rica.ARACHNE 11(2): 4-20. Gamache, Martin and Amanda Gollaway (2006): Exkursion nach Trinidad: Psalmopoeus cambridgei POCOCK, 1895 in freier Natur.ARACHNE 11(3): 22-26. Maréchal, P., C. Marty (1998): Réhabilitation du genre Harmonicon (Pickard-Cambridge, 1896) et description d'une nouvelle espèce de Guyana française (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Dipluridae).Zoosystema 20: 499-504. Mello-Leitão, C. F. De. (1924b): Quelques arachnides nouveaux du Bresil.Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. 93: 179-187. Mello-Leitão, C. F. De. (1926a): Algumas Theraphosoideas novas do Brasil.Rev. Mus. Paulista 14: 307-324. Mello-Leitão, C. F. De. (1937a): Aranhas novas ou raras.Ann. Acad. brasil. Sci. 9: 1-12. Mello-Leitão, C. F. De. (1941a): Notas sobre a sistematica das aranhas com descrição de algumas novas especies Sul Ameicanas.Anais Acad. bras. Cienc. 13: 103-127. Mello-Leitão, C. F. De. (1941b): Catalogo das aranhas da Colombia.Anais Acad. bras. Cienc. 13: 233-300. Mello-Leitão, C. F. De. (1945c): Some interesting new Brazilian spiders.Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci 36: 169-175. Paz S., N. (1993): Aspectos de la biologia reproductiva de Linohele megatheloides (Araneae, Dipluridae).J. Arachnol. 21: 40-49. Paz S., N. & Raven, Robert J. (1989): A new species of Linothele from Colombia (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Dipluridae).J. Arachnol. 18: 79-86. Pedroso, D. R., R. L. C. Bapatista (2004): Redescription of Trechona venosa (Latreille, 1832) and designation of its neotype (Araneae: Dipluridae).Revta Ibérica Aracnol. 10: 149-156. Raven, R. J. (1983b): Notes on some mygalomorph spiders in the Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale (Dipluridae, Hexathelidae, Ctenizidae: Araneae).Revue Zool. afr. 97: 549-562. Raven, R. J. (1984c): A revision of the Aname maculata species group (Dipluridae, Araneae) with notes o +" Thanks for the kind words. (talk) " +Jeff Habay and the rest of them Thank you for your very thorough review of the Jeff Habay article. I will incorporate the suggestions over the next few weeks, hopefully culminating in a GA. I do have a question on another matter. I collected links for some Pennsylvania General Assembly-specific resources on one page, with instructions on how to use them: +REDIRECT Talk:Kaišiadorys District Municipality +Shit!!! Shit!!! Fuck you!!! Random moi you're son of a bitch!!! +Gamecube action replay on Wii Is the gamecube action replay compatible on the Wii? if so, do you have to take the action replay disc out while the Wii is on and put the gamecube game in and all that after you have selected your cheats? +National Management Association Hi, thank you for the article National Management Association. If you are the copyright owner of the content copied from another website, you need to release this content under a free content license. Please send a mail to permissions-en (at) wikimedia.org, as mentioned at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Also, please note that Wikipedia discourages its contributors to create or edit articles about themselves or their organization: have a look at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. | talk +I have recently written a history of MRI article for the journal Neurosurgical Focus and provide a link to the Nature Precedings version. I believe that it fairly placed Damadian's specific contributions in their appropriate historical context. It also explores the difficulty of knowing how invention and priority are based.[ } +I should say! I have never even heard of them. +In the past I've objected to language that name China as the origin of gunpowder with that much certainty, but as I've seen more and more references, I've come to agree that that's the widely accepted view. I've altered the wording of that part of the article a bit for better flow and to give more info. +" However, I have done some completely original Facebook research. It's unreliable, but I think Putty and at least a few other editors (NObodyOfConsquence, NonZionist, etc) might have been members of the ""IINAC"" group. Then there are those who probably still wish it is around. Of course, I'm only speculating like the rest of you and it's not based upon anything. " +And what do you mean by deragatory comments? I think France itself is beautiful! And the people are sweetie-pies! There was no deragatorism anywhere. And I am for improving Wikipedia. Are you? +Did CSS fall off the earth or something? What happened to the left bar and why is everything so ugly and unorganized? 23 July 2005 19:03 (UTC) +not good! I need to buckle down and do all the reading needed. I do mean to do some work on this but have not made enough progress to even summarise the issues yet. Sorry for the delay. ++: t/c +I have already said that I will halt my edits. My position is that there is no accademic consensus that Halloween has no Celitc roots. Its also that we should not imply that one bleife (it has no celtic roots) has greater accademic support then the view it does. Or to put it another way undoo Bakulan's last edits. The artciel prety much said thre was disagrement but assigned no value to sides of that disageemnt (and besides the new page may be mis-representing at least some soorces as writen). +Since there are speculated to be gaps in the list? Why are scholars so certain Jonathan III is the High-Priest at the time of Jesus? +" Thank you Hello and thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. I should thank people who do that more often. (talk) " +|I appeal the block on grounds this block is unjustified. I seek review before either Scientizzle for reversal or before Remember the dot. I don't think Guy would allow me out early to resume my research work. I don't believe he'd give me a fair hearing. +" Jackson Wacko Jacko has only sold 170 million records worldwide, while Elvis ""The King"" Presley has sold 1.1 billion." +Muslim Was he a recent Islamic convert? +" ""This is the umpteenth viewdelee proposal we've had lately"" At WP:VPR? - Dank (push to talk) " +Why do always have to screw things up? +You are a nazi. Your defense of the Latin American dictatorships and their killings is awful. +1) Agree with Arnoutf on research: The section right now is named Education and research and with more than half of the content it covers student exchange. This is not Economy, very simple. There is also no reason to split the section 2) A section named Single Currency is not possible because there is no single currency, there are 15 ! 3) Competition is important, correct! Therefore it fits perfectly in an introduction of Economy or even in Single market. Note that this article has overlength size. +Terry Hurlock Piss off, cretin. 77.130.195.17 +" Hello Helmut777, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. The Polytechnic of Namibia project page for the Information Competence course is here: Wikipedia:School and university projects/Polytechnic of Namibia. Please leave your signature there so that we know which user name belongs to which group. Make sure you are logged in when working on your assignment (Check the top-right corner of your browser window, your user name should appear there). If you haven't created an account yet, please do so here. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or your tutor — We're happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia. Additional tips... Create all your content in your user space. Here you find help on how to do that. You may also use the Article wizard. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Helmut777, good luck, and have fun. " +" Sure no problem. ''''♪piano " +Welcome to the Nazi website. Where's Hitler? \ No newline at end of file