Synchronizing local compiler cache.

neuronxcc-2.15.128.0+56dc5a86/0_REGISTRY/0.0.25.dev0/training/llama/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B/5fcdb26b941150a4bf9e.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"architectures": ["LlamaForCausalLM"], "attention_bias": false, "attention_dropout": 0.0, "bos_token_id": 128256, "eos_token_id": 128257, "head_dim": 64, "hidden_act": "silu", "hidden_size": 2048, "initializer_range": 0.02, "intermediate_size": 8192, "max_position_embeddings": 131072, "mlp_bias": false, "model_type": "llama", "neuron": {"compiler_version": "2.15.128.0+56dc5a86", "input_specs": {"chosen": ["<|im_start|>user\nCompute $\\dbinom{13}{4}+\\dbinom{13}{9}$.<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>assistant\nThis is a problem involving binomial coefficients, which count the number of ways to choose a subset of a certain size from a larger set.\nI know that there is a symmetry property for binomial coefficients, which says that $\\dbinom{n}{k}=\\dbinom{n}{n-k}$ for any $n$ and $k$.\nThis means that I can rewrite $\\dbinom{13}{9}$ as $\\dbinom{13}{13-9}=\\dbinom{13}{4}$.\nSo the expression I want to compute is actually $\\dbinom{13}{4}+\\dbinom{13}{4}=2\\dbinom{13}{4}$.\nNow I just need to recall the formula for binomial coefficients, which is $\\dbinom{n}{k}=\\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$, where $n!$ is the factorial function that multiplies all the positive integers up to $n$.\nPlugging in $n=13$ and $k=4$, I get $\\dbinom{13}{4}=\\frac{13!}{4!(13-4)!}=\\frac{13\\times 12\\times 11\\times 10}{4\\times 3\\times 2\\times 1}=\\frac{17160}{24}=715$.\nSo the final answer is $2\\dbinom{13}{4}=2\\times 715=1430$.\n# Answer\n\n1430<|im_end|>\n"], "chosen_attention_mask": [1, 512], "chosen_input_ids": [1, 512], "chosen_labels": [1, 512], "prompt": ["Compute $\\dbinom{13}{4}+\\dbinom{13}{9}$."], "prompt_attention_mask": [1, 512], "prompt_input_ids": [1, 512], "question": ["Compute $\\dbinom{13}{4}+\\dbinom{13}{9}$."], "rejected": ["<|im_start|>user\nCompute $\\dbinom{13}{4}+\\dbinom{13}{9}$.<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>assistant\nNote that $\\dbinom{13}{4} = \\dfrac{13!}{4!9!} = \\dbinom{13}{9}$. Thus, we have \\begin{align*}\n\\dbinom{13}{4}+\\dbinom{13}{9} &= 2\\times \\dbinom{13}{4} \\\\\n&= 2\\times \\dfrac{13!}{4!9!} \\\\\n&= 2\\times \\dfrac{13\\times 12\\times 11\\times 10}{4\\times 3\\times 2\\times 1} \\\\\n&= 2\\times 13 \\times \\dfrac{12}{4\\times 3} \\times 11 \\times \\dfrac{10}{2\\times 1} \\\\\n&= 2\\times 13\\times 1\\times 11\\times 5 \\\\\n&= 13\\times 11\\times 10 \\\\\n&= \\boxed{1430}.\n\\end{align*}<|im_end|>\n"], "rejected_attention_mask": [1, 512], "rejected_input_ids": [1, 512], "rejected_labels": [1, 512], "source": ["prm_dpo_pairs"]}, "model_class": "PeftModelForCausalLM", "num_neuron_cores_per_node": 2, "pipeline_parallel_size": 1, "precision": "bfloat16", "tensor_parallel_size": 1, "training": true}, "num_attention_heads": 32, "num_hidden_layers": 16, "num_key_value_heads": 8, "pad_token_id": 128257, "pretraining_tp": 1, "rms_norm_eps": 1e-05, "rope_scaling": {"factor": 32.0, "high_freq_factor": 4.0, "low_freq_factor": 1.0, "original_max_position_embeddings": 8192, "rope_type": "llama3"}, "rope_theta": 500000.0, "tie_word_embeddings": true, "torch_dtype": "bfloat16", "use_cache": true, "vocab_size": 128258}

neuronxcc-2.15.128.0+56dc5a86/0_REGISTRY/0.0.25.dev0/training/llama/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B/a8a815d143cd08303f4c.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"architectures": ["LlamaForCausalLM"], "attention_bias": false, "attention_dropout": 0.0, "bos_token_id": 128256, "eos_token_id": 128257, "head_dim": 64, "hidden_act": "silu", "hidden_size": 2048, "initializer_range": 0.02, "intermediate_size": 8192, "max_position_embeddings": 131072, "mlp_bias": false, "model_type": "llama", "neuron": {"compiler_version": "2.15.128.0+56dc5a86", "input_specs": {"chosen": ["<|im_start|>user\nCan you summarize the role and responsibilities of the Professional Standards Unit within the New Castle County Division of Police?\nGenerate according to: The primary function of the Professional Standards Unit is the receipt and assignment of complaints received from citizens regarding the actions of New Castle County Police officers. Complaints received by this unit, are normally investigated by two supervisory investigators with the oversight of a Captain, who reports directly to the Chief and Deputy Chief of Police. The findings from the investigations are reported back to the complaining citizen and the accused officer(s).\nThe Professional Standards Unit is also responsible for tracking all disciplinary matters and complaints against Division of Police personnel. An annual summary of all citizen complaints and internal administrative investigations is available through the Professional Standards Unit.\nPROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC by identifying and effecting corrective action of police division personnel and changing procedures that negatively affect the quality of life in the areas that we service.\nPROTECTION OF THE DIVISION by taking appropriate action so that misconduct of a few will not detract from the overall reputation of the New Castle County Division of Police.\nPROTECTION OF THE OFFICER against false or malicious allegations of misconduct by ensuring fairness and accuracy in all investigations.\nWhile all allegations of misconduct are considered important to the division, the Professional Standards Unit investigates allegations of misconduct that generally carry more serious consequences for the officer, the division, or community confidence in the police. Complaints with less serious consequences may remain with the officer\u2019s immediate supervisor to investigate.\nIt is the policy of the Police Division to accept and investigate all complaints or allegations of misconduct on the part of any employee. In doing so, the division will endeavor to be fair to both the complainant and the employees involved.\nThe Professional Standards Unit may also be contacted by calling 302-395-8008.\nOnce your complaint has been received, it will be investigated according to appropriate procedures and you will be notified of the results. The Division of Police encourages the filing of legitimate complaints as a means to hold the division and its employees accountable to the public.\nWhat can I expect when speaking with a Professional Standards Unit investigator?\nProfessional Standards Unit investigators and other supervisors make every effort to record the statements of all parties involved and interviewed. The value in this process is that these statements become part of the record that an officer's supervision reviews before deciding a case disposition.\nOnce the investigation is complete, one of four possible findings is made.\n1. Sustained. The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n2. Not Sustained. The investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n3. Exonerated. The acts which provided the basis for the complaint or allegation occurred; however, the investigation revealed they were justified, lawful, and proper.\n4. Unfounded. The investigation conclusively proved that the act or acts alleged did not occur.\nThe complainant will be notified of the disposition or conclusion of the case. The details pertaining to the investigation and related discipline will not provided to the complainant. Under Delaware Law, Title 11 Chapter 92; Law-Enforcement Officers\u2019 Bill of Rights, restricts the release of personnel information relating to suspensions and other disciplinary actions of a police officer.\nAlthough we encourage citizens to report police misconduct, complaints must be made in good faith. False or highly exaggerated complaints serve no good purpose for either the citizens or the officer and only tend to thwart our complaint-taking process. Anyone who willfully makes any false accusation for the purpose of discrediting a police officer may be prosecuted.<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>assistant\nThe Professional Standards Unit (PSU) within the New Castle County Division of Police primarily handles the receipt, assignment, and investigation of complaints from citizens regarding the actions of police officers. Supervisory investigators oversee the investigations under a Captain who reports to the Chief and Deputy Chief of Police. The PSU also tracks disciplinary matters and complaints against police personnel.\n\nThe unit aims to protect the public by identifying and correcting inappropriate actions or procedures; protect the division by ensuring that misconduct does not tarnish its reputation; and protect officers against false or malicious allegations by ensuring fairness and accuracy in investigations. The PSU investigates more serious allegations, while less serious ones may be investigated by the officer's supervisor.\n\nIt is the division's policy to accept and investigate all complaints or allegations, striving for fairness to both the complainant and the employees involved. The PSU can be contacted by calling 302-395-8008. Upon receiving a complaint, it will be investigated, and the complainant will be notified of the results.\n\nWhen speaking with a PSU investigator, complainants can expect their statements to be recorded and included in the investigation. The investigation will result in one of four possible findings: Sustained, Not Sustained, Exonerated, or Unfounded. Complainants will be informed of the conclusion, but not provided with details about the investigation or related discipline, as per Delaware Law.\n\nWhile citizens are encouraged to report police misconduct, false or exaggerated complaints may hinder the process and can potentially lead to prosecution.<|im_end|>\n"], "chosen_attention_mask": [1, 512], "chosen_input_ids": [1, 512], "chosen_labels": [1, 512], "prompt": ["Can you summarize the role and responsibilities of the Professional Standards Unit within the New Castle County Division of Police?\nGenerate according to: The primary function of the Professional Standards Unit is the receipt and assignment of complaints received from citizens regarding the actions of New Castle County Police officers. Complaints received by this unit, are normally investigated by two supervisory investigators with the oversight of a Captain, who reports directly to the Chief and Deputy Chief of Police. The findings from the investigations are reported back to the complaining citizen and the accused officer(s).\nThe Professional Standards Unit is also responsible for tracking all disciplinary matters and complaints against Division of Police personnel. An annual summary of all citizen complaints and internal administrative investigations is available through the Professional Standards Unit.\nPROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC by identifying and effecting corrective action of police division personnel and changing procedures that negatively affect the quality of life in the areas that we service.\nPROTECTION OF THE DIVISION by taking appropriate action so that misconduct of a few will not detract from the overall reputation of the New Castle County Division of Police.\nPROTECTION OF THE OFFICER against false or malicious allegations of misconduct by ensuring fairness and accuracy in all investigations.\nWhile all allegations of misconduct are considered important to the division, the Professional Standards Unit investigates allegations of misconduct that generally carry more serious consequences for the officer, the division, or community confidence in the police. Complaints with less serious consequences may remain with the officer\u2019s immediate supervisor to investigate.\nIt is the policy of the Police Division to accept and investigate all complaints or allegations of misconduct on the part of any employee. In doing so, the division will endeavor to be fair to both the complainant and the employees involved.\nThe Professional Standards Unit may also be contacted by calling 302-395-8008.\nOnce your complaint has been received, it will be investigated according to appropriate procedures and you will be notified of the results. The Division of Police encourages the filing of legitimate complaints as a means to hold the division and its employees accountable to the public.\nWhat can I expect when speaking with a Professional Standards Unit investigator?\nProfessional Standards Unit investigators and other supervisors make every effort to record the statements of all parties involved and interviewed. The value in this process is that these statements become part of the record that an officer's supervision reviews before deciding a case disposition.\nOnce the investigation is complete, one of four possible findings is made.\n1. Sustained. The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n2. Not Sustained. The investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n3. Exonerated. The acts which provided the basis for the complaint or allegation occurred; however, the investigation revealed they were justified, lawful, and proper.\n4. Unfounded. The investigation conclusively proved that the act or acts alleged did not occur.\nThe complainant will be notified of the disposition or conclusion of the case. The details pertaining to the investigation and related discipline will not provided to the complainant. Under Delaware Law, Title 11 Chapter 92; Law-Enforcement Officers\u2019 Bill of Rights, restricts the release of personnel information relating to suspensions and other disciplinary actions of a police officer.\nAlthough we encourage citizens to report police misconduct, complaints must be made in good faith. False or highly exaggerated complaints serve no good purpose for either the citizens or the officer and only tend to thwart our complaint-taking process. Anyone who willfully makes any false accusation for the purpose of discrediting a police officer may be prosecuted."], "prompt_attention_mask": [1, 512], "prompt_input_ids": [1, 512], "question": ["Can you summarize the role and responsibilities of the Professional Standards Unit within the New Castle County Division of Police?\nGenerate according to: The primary function of the Professional Standards Unit is the receipt and assignment of complaints received from citizens regarding the actions of New Castle County Police officers. Complaints received by this unit, are normally investigated by two supervisory investigators with the oversight of a Captain, who reports directly to the Chief and Deputy Chief of Police. The findings from the investigations are reported back to the complaining citizen and the accused officer(s).\nThe Professional Standards Unit is also responsible for tracking all disciplinary matters and complaints against Division of Police personnel. An annual summary of all citizen complaints and internal administrative investigations is available through the Professional Standards Unit.\nPROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC by identifying and effecting corrective action of police division personnel and changing procedures that negatively affect the quality of life in the areas that we service.\nPROTECTION OF THE DIVISION by taking appropriate action so that misconduct of a few will not detract from the overall reputation of the New Castle County Division of Police.\nPROTECTION OF THE OFFICER against false or malicious allegations of misconduct by ensuring fairness and accuracy in all investigations.\nWhile all allegations of misconduct are considered important to the division, the Professional Standards Unit investigates allegations of misconduct that generally carry more serious consequences for the officer, the division, or community confidence in the police. Complaints with less serious consequences may remain with the officer\u2019s immediate supervisor to investigate.\nIt is the policy of the Police Division to accept and investigate all complaints or allegations of misconduct on the part of any employee. In doing so, the division will endeavor to be fair to both the complainant and the employees involved.\nThe Professional Standards Unit may also be contacted by calling 302-395-8008.\nOnce your complaint has been received, it will be investigated according to appropriate procedures and you will be notified of the results. The Division of Police encourages the filing of legitimate complaints as a means to hold the division and its employees accountable to the public.\nWhat can I expect when speaking with a Professional Standards Unit investigator?\nProfessional Standards Unit investigators and other supervisors make every effort to record the statements of all parties involved and interviewed. The value in this process is that these statements become part of the record that an officer's supervision reviews before deciding a case disposition.\nOnce the investigation is complete, one of four possible findings is made.\n1. Sustained. The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n2. Not Sustained. The investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n3. Exonerated. The acts which provided the basis for the complaint or allegation occurred; however, the investigation revealed they were justified, lawful, and proper.\n4. Unfounded. The investigation conclusively proved that the act or acts alleged did not occur.\nThe complainant will be notified of the disposition or conclusion of the case. The details pertaining to the investigation and related discipline will not provided to the complainant. Under Delaware Law, Title 11 Chapter 92; Law-Enforcement Officers\u2019 Bill of Rights, restricts the release of personnel information relating to suspensions and other disciplinary actions of a police officer.\nAlthough we encourage citizens to report police misconduct, complaints must be made in good faith. False or highly exaggerated complaints serve no good purpose for either the citizens or the officer and only tend to thwart our complaint-taking process. Anyone who willfully makes any false accusation for the purpose of discrediting a police officer may be prosecuted."], "rejected": ["<|im_start|>user\nCan you summarize the role and responsibilities of the Professional Standards Unit within the New Castle County Division of Police?\nGenerate according to: The primary function of the Professional Standards Unit is the receipt and assignment of complaints received from citizens regarding the actions of New Castle County Police officers. Complaints received by this unit, are normally investigated by two supervisory investigators with the oversight of a Captain, who reports directly to the Chief and Deputy Chief of Police. The findings from the investigations are reported back to the complaining citizen and the accused officer(s).\nThe Professional Standards Unit is also responsible for tracking all disciplinary matters and complaints against Division of Police personnel. An annual summary of all citizen complaints and internal administrative investigations is available through the Professional Standards Unit.\nPROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC by identifying and effecting corrective action of police division personnel and changing procedures that negatively affect the quality of life in the areas that we service.\nPROTECTION OF THE DIVISION by taking appropriate action so that misconduct of a few will not detract from the overall reputation of the New Castle County Division of Police.\nPROTECTION OF THE OFFICER against false or malicious allegations of misconduct by ensuring fairness and accuracy in all investigations.\nWhile all allegations of misconduct are considered important to the division, the Professional Standards Unit investigates allegations of misconduct that generally carry more serious consequences for the officer, the division, or community confidence in the police. Complaints with less serious consequences may remain with the officer\u2019s immediate supervisor to investigate.\nIt is the policy of the Police Division to accept and investigate all complaints or allegations of misconduct on the part of any employee. In doing so, the division will endeavor to be fair to both the complainant and the employees involved.\nThe Professional Standards Unit may also be contacted by calling 302-395-8008.\nOnce your complaint has been received, it will be investigated according to appropriate procedures and you will be notified of the results. The Division of Police encourages the filing of legitimate complaints as a means to hold the division and its employees accountable to the public.\nWhat can I expect when speaking with a Professional Standards Unit investigator?\nProfessional Standards Unit investigators and other supervisors make every effort to record the statements of all parties involved and interviewed. The value in this process is that these statements become part of the record that an officer's supervision reviews before deciding a case disposition.\nOnce the investigation is complete, one of four possible findings is made.\n1. Sustained. The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n2. Not Sustained. The investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to prove the allegations made in the complaint.\n3. Exonerated. The acts which provided the basis for the complaint or allegation occurred; however, the investigation revealed they were justified, lawful, and proper.\n4. Unfounded. The investigation conclusively proved that the act or acts alleged did not occur.\nThe complainant will be notified of the disposition or conclusion of the case. The details pertaining to the investigation and related discipline will not provided to the complainant. Under Delaware Law, Title 11 Chapter 92; Law-Enforcement Officers\u2019 Bill of Rights, restricts the release of personnel information relating to suspensions and other disciplinary actions of a police officer.\nAlthough we encourage citizens to report police misconduct, complaints must be made in good faith. False or highly exaggerated complaints serve no good purpose for either the citizens or the officer and only tend to thwart our complaint-taking process. Anyone who willfully makes any false accusation for the purpose of discrediting a police officer may be prosecuted.<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>assistant\nThe Professional Standards Unit (PSU) is responsible for receiving and following up on complaints about police conduct in the New Castle County Division of Police. They investigate these complaints and report their findings back to the citizen who filed the complaint and the officer(s) involved. The PSU is also responsible for tracking all disciplinary matters and complaints against police personnel, and produces an annual summary of these incidents. The PSU's goals are to protect the public from misconduct by police officers and to ensure that all officers are held accountable for their actions. The PSU may also be reached at 302-395-8008. When speaking with a PSU investigator, the individual will be asked to provide information about their complaint and will have the opportunity to ask questions. After the investigation, one of four possible outcomes will be decided: sustained, not sustained, exonerated, or unfounded. Complaints must be made in good faith, as false allegations can impede the complaint-taking process and may result in legal repercussions.<|im_end|>\n"], "rejected_attention_mask": [1, 512], "rejected_input_ids": [1, 512], "rejected_labels": [1, 512], "source": ["ultrachat"]}, "model_class": "PeftModelForCausalLM", "num_neuron_cores_per_node": 2, "pipeline_parallel_size": 1, "precision": "bfloat16", "tensor_parallel_size": 1, "training": true}, "num_attention_heads": 32, "num_hidden_layers": 16, "num_key_value_heads": 8, "pad_token_id": 128257, "pretraining_tp": 1, "rms_norm_eps": 1e-05, "rope_scaling": {"factor": 32.0, "high_freq_factor": 4.0, "low_freq_factor": 1.0, "original_max_position_embeddings": 8192, "rope_type": "llama3"}, "rope_theta": 500000.0, "tie_word_embeddings": true, "torch_dtype": "bfloat16", "use_cache": true, "vocab_size": 128258}

neuronxcc-2.15.128.0+56dc5a86/0_REGISTRY/0.0.25.dev0/training/llama/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B/b94707037bc51ce501d9.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"architectures": ["LlamaForCausalLM"], "attention_bias": false, "attention_dropout": 0.0, "bos_token_id": 128256, "eos_token_id": 128257, "head_dim": 64, "hidden_act": "silu", "hidden_size": 2048, "initializer_range": 0.02, "intermediate_size": 8192, "max_position_embeddings": 131072, "mlp_bias": false, "model_type": "llama", "neuron": {"compiler_version": "2.15.128.0+56dc5a86", "input_specs": {"chosen": ["<|im_start|>user\nIn addition to the given prompt, include a requirement that the proposal must also address the impact of air pollution on human health and propose specific measures to mitigate it. Use [Tableau data visualization] to present the health impact analysis of each proposed step. The cost-benefit analysis should also take into account the health benefits. Use [Python code] to conduct a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of the cost-benefit analysis under different assumptions.<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>assistant\nTo comprehensively address air pollution and its impact on human health, it is essential to adopt a multi-faceted approach with specific measures to mitigate air pollution and present health impact analysis using data visualization. In this proposal, we outline the steps that consider these factors, accompanied by Tableau data visualization for analysis and Python code for the sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of our cost-benefit findings.\n\nI. Health impact of air pollution\n1. Analysis of air pollutant concentration and health indicators\n2. Identification of high-risk susceptible groups and geographic regions\n3. Evaluation of the association between pollutant exposure and health outcomes\n\nVisualize the health impact analysis using Tableau by creating:\n- Maps to identify the geographic distribution of pollution levels and high-risk areas\n- Charts to compare pollutant concentrations with health indicators\n- Heatmaps and correlation graphs to assess the association between pollutants and health risks\n\nII. Proposed measures to mitigate air pollution\n1. Implementation of stringent industrial emission standards\n2. Deployment of renewable energy resources to replace fossil fuel-based power generation\n3. Improvement of public transportation infrastructure to reduce vehicular emissions\n4. Promotion of tree plantation and green urban area development\n\nFor each proposed measure, utilize Tableau data visualization to present before-and-after scenarios to convey the impact of each proposal on public health.\n\nIII. Cost-benefit analysis incorporating health benefits\n1. Quantification of direct costs associated with each proposed measure\n2. Estimation of indirect costs, such as downtime for industries and transition costs\n3. Valuation of health benefits, including reduced healthcare expenditure and increased productivity\n\nConduct sensitivity analyses using Python code, taking different assumptions into consideration:\n\n```python\nimport numpy as np\nimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n\n# Inputs - Cost and benefit values under different assumptions\ncosts = np.array([[cost_scenario_1], [cost_scenario_2], [cost_scenario_3]])\nbenefits = np.array([[benefit_scenario_1], [benefit_scenario_2], [benefit_scenario_3]])\n\n# Calculate net benefits\nnet_benefits = benefits - costs\n\n# Sensitivity analysis\nfig, ax = plt.subplots()\nax.plot(net_benefits[0], label='Scenario 1')\nax.plot(net_benefits[1], label='Scenario 2')\nax.plot(net_benefits[2], label='Scenario 3')\nax.set_ylabel('Net Benefits')\nax.set_xlabel('Proposed Measures')\nax.set_xticks(range(len(net_benefits[0])))\nax.set_xticklabels(['Measure 1', 'Measure 2', 'Measure 3', 'Measure 4'])\nax.legend()\nplt.show()\n```\n\nWith this comprehensive approach, we deliver an effective proposal that addresses air pollution and its impact on human health, using Tableau data visualization for the presentation of health impact analyses and Python code for evaluating the robustness of cost-benefit analysis. Furthermore, the focus will be on learning opportunities within each interaction to ensure users receive accurate, positive, and engaging content.<|im_end|>\n"], "chosen_attention_mask": [1, 512], "chosen_input_ids": [1, 512], "chosen_labels": [1, 512], "prompt": ["In addition to the given prompt, include a requirement that the proposal must also address the impact of air pollution on human health and propose specific measures to mitigate it. Use [Tableau data visualization] to present the health impact analysis of each proposed step. The cost-benefit analysis should also take into account the health benefits. Use [Python code] to conduct a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of the cost-benefit analysis under different assumptions."], "prompt_attention_mask": [1, 512], "prompt_input_ids": [1, 512], "question": ["In addition to the given prompt, include a requirement that the proposal must also address the impact of air pollution on human health and propose specific measures to mitigate it. Use [Tableau data visualization] to present the health impact analysis of each proposed step. The cost-benefit analysis should also take into account the health benefits. Use [Python code] to conduct a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of the cost-benefit analysis under different assumptions."], "rejected": ["<|im_start|>user\nIn addition to the given prompt, include a requirement that the proposal must also address the impact of air pollution on human health and propose specific measures to mitigate it. Use [Tableau data visualization] to present the health impact analysis of each proposed step. The cost-benefit analysis should also take into account the health benefits. Use [Python code] to conduct a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of the cost-benefit analysis under different assumptions.<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>assistant\nTitle: A comprehensive Action Plan for Reducing Vehicular Pollution and its Health Impact in Delhi\n\nI. Executive Summary:\n\nThis proposal presents a comprehensive action plan to tackle the problem of vehicular pollution in Delhi, with a particular focus on the launch of BSVI vehicles, implementation of BRT, promotion of public transportation, and enforcement of traffic restrictions. In addition, the plan addresses the critical issue of air pollution's impact on human health and proposes specific measures to mitigate it. Data visualizations using Tableau and Python code for sensitivity analysis are employed to demonstrate the cost-benefit analysis and the robustness of the proposed measures.\n\nII. Problem Statement:\n\nThe current situation in Delhi involves high levels of air pollution, particularly from vehicular emissions. The city's air quality index (AQI) frequently exceeds the safe limit, posing significant health risks to its residents. The primary cause of air pollution is the increasing number of vehicles on the city's roads, with the transport sector accounting for 21% of particulate matter (PM2.5) and 18% of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions.\n\nIII. Analysis of the given prompt:\n\na. Launch of BSVI vehicles by 2023<|im_end|>\n"], "rejected_attention_mask": [1, 512], "rejected_input_ids": [1, 512], "rejected_labels": [1, 512], "source": ["evol_instruct"]}, "model_class": "PeftModelForCausalLM", "num_neuron_cores_per_node": 2, "pipeline_parallel_size": 1, "precision": "bfloat16", "tensor_parallel_size": 1, "training": true}, "num_attention_heads": 32, "num_hidden_layers": 16, "num_key_value_heads": 8, "pad_token_id": 128257, "pretraining_tp": 1, "rms_norm_eps": 1e-05, "rope_scaling": {"factor": 32.0, "high_freq_factor": 4.0, "low_freq_factor": 1.0, "original_max_position_embeddings": 8192, "rope_type": "llama3"}, "rope_theta": 500000.0, "tie_word_embeddings": true, "torch_dtype": "bfloat16", "use_cache": true, "vocab_size": 128258}