File size: 20,985 Bytes
e0f9114 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 |
---
base_model: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
library_name: setfit
metrics:
- accuracy
pipeline_tag: text-classification
tags:
- setfit
- sentence-transformers
- text-classification
- generated_from_setfit_trainer
widget:
- text: 'The provided answer is quite disjointed and does not directly address the
specific question about accessing the company''s training resources. The listed
methods are more related to accessing various internal tools and processes rather
than directly answering the question. Let''s break down the problems:
1. **System and personal documents**: Mentions accessing personal documents, contracts,
and making reimbursements, which are not directly related to training resources.
2. **Password Manager (1Password)**: This piece of information about managing
passwords is irrelevant to accessing training resources.
3. **Tresorit**: Focuses on secure information sharing, not on training resources.
4. **Coffee session for feedback**: This is related to clarifying feedback, not
directly about accessing training resources.
5. **Learning Budget**: This section is somewhat relevant but is more about requesting
financial support for training rather than providing a direct method to access
training resources.
The answer needs to clearly outline specific steps or platforms dedicated to training
resources, which is mostly missing here.
Final Result: **Bad**'
- text: 'The answer succinctly addresses the question by stating that finance@ORGANIZATION_2.<89312988>
should be contacted for questions about travel reimbursement. This is correctly
derived from the provided document, which specifies that questions about travel
costs and reimbursements should be directed to the finance email.
Final evaluation: Good'
- text: 'The answer provided correctly mentions the essential aspects outlined in
the document, such as the importance for team leads to actively consider the possibility
of team members leaving, to flag these situations to HR, analyze problems, provide
feedback, and take proactive steps in various issues like underperformance or
lack of growth. The answer also captures the significance of creating a supportive
environment, maintaining alignment with the company''s vision and mission, ensuring
work-life balance, and providing regular feedback and praise.
However, while the answer is generally comprehensive, it could be slightly more
direct and concise in its communication. The document points to the necessity
for team leads to think about potential exits to preemptively address issues and
essentially prevent situations that may necessitate separation if they aren''t
managed well. This could have been emphasized more clearly.
Overall, the answer aligns well with the content and intent of the document.
Final evaluation: Good'
- text: 'Reasoning:
The answer provided is relevant to the question as it directs the user to go to
the website and check job ads and newsletters for more information about ORGANIZATION.
However, it lacks comprehensive details. It only partially addresses how one can
understand ORGANIZATION''s product, challenges, and future since the documents
suggest accessing job ads and newsletters, and no further content or documents
were leveraged to provide insights into product details, current challenges, or
future plans.
Final evaluation: Bad'
- text: 'Evaluation:
The answer provides a detailed response directly addressing the question, mentioning
that the ORGANIZATION_2 and key individuals like Thomas Barnes and Charlotte Herrera
play a supportive role in the farewell process. This includes handling paperwork,
providing guidance, and assisting with tough conversations. The answer aligns
well with the details provided in the document.
The final evaluation: Good'
inference: true
model-index:
- name: SetFit with BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
results:
- task:
type: text-classification
name: Text Classification
dataset:
name: Unknown
type: unknown
split: test
metrics:
- type: accuracy
value: 0.6268656716417911
name: Accuracy
---
# SetFit with BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
This is a [SetFit](https://github.com/huggingface/setfit) model that can be used for Text Classification. This SetFit model uses [BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5](https://huggingface.co./BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5) as the Sentence Transformer embedding model. A [LogisticRegression](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegression.html) instance is used for classification.
The model has been trained using an efficient few-shot learning technique that involves:
1. Fine-tuning a [Sentence Transformer](https://www.sbert.net) with contrastive learning.
2. Training a classification head with features from the fine-tuned Sentence Transformer.
## Model Details
### Model Description
- **Model Type:** SetFit
- **Sentence Transformer body:** [BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5](https://huggingface.co./BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5)
- **Classification head:** a [LogisticRegression](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegression.html) instance
- **Maximum Sequence Length:** 512 tokens
- **Number of Classes:** 2 classes
<!-- - **Training Dataset:** [Unknown](https://huggingface.co./datasets/unknown) -->
<!-- - **Language:** Unknown -->
<!-- - **License:** Unknown -->
### Model Sources
- **Repository:** [SetFit on GitHub](https://github.com/huggingface/setfit)
- **Paper:** [Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts](https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11055)
- **Blogpost:** [SetFit: Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts](https://huggingface.co./blog/setfit)
### Model Labels
| Label | Examples |
|:------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 | <ul><li>'The answer provided is a general approach to saving money, offering advice on spending wisely, making good investments, and considering personal goals. It also suggests discussing with a lead or ORGANIZATION_2 for guidance and highlights the importance of health and setting priorities.\n\nHowever, the answer lacks direct grounding in the provided document, which primarily discusses budgeting for studies and spending on learning and development. The document emphasizes evaluating expenditures based on their benefits to personal and organizational goals but does not offer explicit general financial saving tips.\n\nDue to this lack of specific correlation and grounding in the document, the evaluation is:\n\nBad'</li><li>'The answer provided reads incoherently due to the insertion of "Cassandra Rivera Heather Nelson" and other names in inappropriate places throughout the text, making it difficult to assess its alignment with the original document.\n\nFurthermore, the inserted names disrupt the meaning of the text, making it unclear if all relevant points from the document are covered accurately. The structure of the sentences becomes disjointed and presents an overall lack of clarity. \n\nGiven the nature of these errors, it\'s impossible to fairly evaluate whether the answer strictly adheres to the details provided in the source documents. Therefore, based on the clarity, coherence, and alignment to the original text, the final result is:\n\nBad'</li><li>"The provided answer does not satisfactorily respond to the question about accessing the company's training resources. Instead, it contains unrelated information about document management, security protocols, feedback processes, and learning budget requests. The relevant information about accessing training resources is clearly missing or obscure.\n\n**Reasoning:**\n\n1. **Irrelevant Details**: The answer includes details about the usage of a password manager, secure sharing of information, and expense reimbursement, none of which pertain to accessing training resources.\n\n2. **Lack of Specificity**: No explicit method or platform for accessing training resources is mentioned, which is the core inquiry.\n\n3. **Missed Key Point**: The document points towards systems used for personal documents and reimbursement requests but fails to highlight training resource access points.\n\nFinal evaluation: **Bad**"</li></ul> |
| 1 | <ul><li>'The answer demonstrates a clear connection to the provided document, outlining key tips and principles for giving feedback as requested by the question. The response includes the importance of timing, focusing on the situation rather than the person, being clear and direct, and the goal of helping rather than shaming. It also mentions the importance of appreciation and receiving feedback with an open mind. \n\nHowever, there are some typographical errors and misplaced words (e.g., "emichelle James Johnson MDamples") that detract slightly from the clarity. Despite these minor issues, the content provided accurately reflects the information in the source document and comprehensively addresses the question. Therefore, the final evaluation is:\n\nGood'</li><li>"The given answer provides a general explanation of why it is important to proactively share information from high-level meetings, but it lacks grounding in the provided document. \n\nWhile the answer discusses the benefits of transparency, alignment with the organization's vision and mission, and fostering an open work environment, it does not directly quote or refer to specific points in the document. This weakens the argument, as it seems more like an independent explanation rather than an answer strictly based on the provided material.\n\nThe document mentions the importance of employees knowing why they are doing what they do and the necessity of closing the information gap by proactively sharing what was discussed in high-level meetings. This specific point from Document 4 could have been directly referenced to make the answer more aligned with the source material.\n\nThus, the answer, although conceptually correct, does not appropriately leverage the provided document.\n\nFinal result: Bad"</li><li>"The answer is partially correct since it provides the most important guidance on how to report car travel expenses for reimbursement. However, it contains inaccuracies and omissions that could cause confusion. \n\n1. The email addresses cited in the answer don’t match those in the document.\n2. There’s mention of requesting a parking card for a specific date (2004-04-14), which implies an inaccurate, irrelevant detail that might mislead the reader.\n3. The answer doesn't explicitly suggest that travel cost reimbursement is handled monthly, which is a crucial piece of information.\n\nConsidering these elements, the evaluation is as follows:\n\n**Evaluation:**\nThe essential details related to car travel reimbursement are present, but incorrect email addresses and irrelevant details might mislead or cause inconvenience for employees.\n\nThe final evaluation: **Bad**"</li></ul> |
## Evaluation
### Metrics
| Label | Accuracy |
|:--------|:---------|
| **all** | 0.6269 |
## Uses
### Direct Use for Inference
First install the SetFit library:
```bash
pip install setfit
```
Then you can load this model and run inference.
```python
from setfit import SetFitModel
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SetFitModel.from_pretrained("Netta1994/setfit_baai_newrelic_gpt-4o_cot-few_shot_only_reasoning_1726750220.456809")
# Run inference
preds = model("The answer succinctly addresses the question by stating that finance@ORGANIZATION_2.<89312988> should be contacted for questions about travel reimbursement. This is correctly derived from the provided document, which specifies that questions about travel costs and reimbursements should be directed to the finance email.
Final evaluation: Good")
```
<!--
### Downstream Use
*List how someone could finetune this model on their own dataset.*
-->
<!--
### Out-of-Scope Use
*List how the model may foreseeably be misused and address what users ought not to do with the model.*
-->
<!--
## Bias, Risks and Limitations
*What are the known or foreseeable issues stemming from this model? You could also flag here known failure cases or weaknesses of the model.*
-->
<!--
### Recommendations
*What are recommendations with respect to the foreseeable issues? For example, filtering explicit content.*
-->
## Training Details
### Training Set Metrics
| Training set | Min | Median | Max |
|:-------------|:----|:--------|:----|
| Word count | 30 | 85.7538 | 210 |
| Label | Training Sample Count |
|:------|:----------------------|
| 0 | 32 |
| 1 | 33 |
### Training Hyperparameters
- batch_size: (16, 16)
- num_epochs: (5, 5)
- max_steps: -1
- sampling_strategy: oversampling
- num_iterations: 20
- body_learning_rate: (2e-05, 2e-05)
- head_learning_rate: 2e-05
- loss: CosineSimilarityLoss
- distance_metric: cosine_distance
- margin: 0.25
- end_to_end: False
- use_amp: False
- warmup_proportion: 0.1
- l2_weight: 0.01
- seed: 42
- eval_max_steps: -1
- load_best_model_at_end: False
### Training Results
| Epoch | Step | Training Loss | Validation Loss |
|:------:|:----:|:-------------:|:---------------:|
| 0.0061 | 1 | 0.2304 | - |
| 0.3067 | 50 | 0.2556 | - |
| 0.6135 | 100 | 0.244 | - |
| 0.9202 | 150 | 0.1218 | - |
| 1.2270 | 200 | 0.0041 | - |
| 1.5337 | 250 | 0.0022 | - |
| 1.8405 | 300 | 0.0017 | - |
| 2.1472 | 350 | 0.0017 | - |
| 2.4540 | 400 | 0.0015 | - |
| 2.7607 | 450 | 0.0014 | - |
| 3.0675 | 500 | 0.0013 | - |
| 3.3742 | 550 | 0.0013 | - |
| 3.6810 | 600 | 0.0012 | - |
| 3.9877 | 650 | 0.0012 | - |
| 4.2945 | 700 | 0.0012 | - |
| 4.6012 | 750 | 0.0012 | - |
| 4.9080 | 800 | 0.0012 | - |
### Framework Versions
- Python: 3.10.14
- SetFit: 1.1.0
- Sentence Transformers: 3.1.0
- Transformers: 4.44.0
- PyTorch: 2.4.1+cu121
- Datasets: 2.19.2
- Tokenizers: 0.19.1
## Citation
### BibTeX
```bibtex
@article{https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2209.11055,
doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2209.11055},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11055},
author = {Tunstall, Lewis and Reimers, Nils and Jo, Unso Eun Seo and Bates, Luke and Korat, Daniel and Wasserblat, Moshe and Pereg, Oren},
keywords = {Computation and Language (cs.CL), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
title = {Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts},
publisher = {arXiv},
year = {2022},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}
```
<!--
## Glossary
*Clearly define terms in order to be accessible across audiences.*
-->
<!--
## Model Card Authors
*Lists the people who create the model card, providing recognition and accountability for the detailed work that goes into its construction.*
-->
<!--
## Model Card Contact
*Provides a way for people who have updates to the Model Card, suggestions, or questions, to contact the Model Card authors.*
--> |