Transformers
English
code
Inference Endpoints
Canstralian commited on
Commit
45b9a79
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 46e80ca

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +204 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -11,4 +11,207 @@ base_model:
11
  library_name: transformers
12
  tags:
13
  - code
14
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
  library_name: transformers
12
  tags:
13
  - code
14
+
15
+ ---
16
+ license: mit
17
+ datasets:
18
+ - Canstralian/ShellCommands
19
+ - Canstralian/CyberExploitDB
20
+ language:
21
+ - en
22
+ base_model:
23
+ - WhiteRabbitNeo/WhiteRabbitNeo-13B-v1
24
+ - replit/replit-code-v1_5-3b
25
+ library_name: transformers
26
+ tags:
27
+ - code
28
+ ---
29
+ # Model Card for Model ID
30
+
31
+ <!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
32
+
33
+ This model card aims to document the capabilities, performance, and intended usage of models fine-tuned for cybersecurity tasks, including shell command parsing and cyber exploit detection. It is based on the underlying models WhiteRabbitNeo-13B-v1 and replit-code-v1_5-3b, fine-tuned on datasets related to shell commands and exploit databases.
34
+
35
+ ## Model Details
36
+
37
+ ### Model Description
38
+
39
+ This model is a fine-tuned version of large-scale language models optimized for tasks such as parsing shell commands and analyzing cybersecurity exploits. The training leverages datasets such as Canstralian/ShellCommands and Canstralian/CyberExploitDB to provide domain-specific knowledge.
40
+
41
+ - **Developed by:** Canstralian (more details needed)
42
+ - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
43
+ - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
44
+ - **Model type:** Transformer-based Language Model for cybersecurity applications
45
+ - **Language(s) (NLP):** English (en)
46
+ - **License:** MIT
47
+ - **Finetuned from model [optional]:** WhiteRabbitNeo/WhiteRabbitNeo-13B-v1, replit/replit-code-v1_5-3b
48
+
49
+ ### Model Sources [optional]
50
+
51
+ - **Repository:** [Add model repository URL here]
52
+ - **Paper [optional]:** [Link to relevant research paper]
53
+ - **Demo [optional]:** [Link to model demo or interface]
54
+
55
+ ## Uses
56
+
57
+ ### Direct Use
58
+
59
+ The model is intended to be used directly for tasks like:
60
+ - Shell command understanding and classification
61
+ - Analyzing and classifying cybersecurity exploit patterns
62
+ - Assisting with code generation and debugging in a cybersecurity context
63
+
64
+ ### Downstream Use [optional]
65
+
66
+ When fine-tuned further, the model can be applied to:
67
+ - Automated incident response systems
68
+ - Security tool integration (e.g., for vulnerability scanners)
69
+ - Custom cybersecurity solutions tailored to enterprise needs
70
+
71
+ ### Out-of-Scope Use
72
+
73
+ The model is not designed for general-purpose natural language understanding outside of its specified cybersecurity domain. It may perform poorly or inaccurately for tasks outside of:
74
+ - Shell command parsing
75
+ - Exploit database analysis
76
+ - Code generation for cybersecurity applications
77
+
78
+ ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
79
+
80
+ This model may exhibit bias in the detection of certain exploits or shell commands, particularly if it encounters unfamiliar patterns not covered in the training data. Additionally, the model's predictions may be less accurate on unseen datasets or with edge cases that were not represented in the training data.
81
+
82
+ ### Recommendations
83
+
84
+ - Users should be cautious when applying the model to novel or unverified exploits, as it may not handle new attack vectors well.
85
+ - Regular evaluation and testing in real-world environments are recommended before deploying the model in production.
86
+
87
+ ## How to Get Started with the Model
88
+
89
+ Use the code below to get started with the model:
90
+
91
+ ```python
92
+ from transformers import pipeline
93
+
94
+ # Load the pre-trained model
95
+ model_name = "Canstralian/WhiteRabbitNeo-13B-v1-finetuned"
96
+ nlp = pipeline("text-classification", model=model_name)
97
+
98
+ # Example usage
99
+ result = nlp("Example shell command or exploit input")
100
+ print(result)
101
+ ```
102
+
103
+ ## Training Details
104
+
105
+ ### Training Data
106
+
107
+ The model was fine-tuned on the following datasets:
108
+ - **Canstralian/ShellCommands**: A collection of shell commands used in cybersecurity contexts.
109
+ - **Canstralian/CyberExploitDB**: A curated set of known exploits and vulnerabilities.
110
+
111
+ Further details on the preprocessing of these datasets can be found in their respective dataset cards.
112
+
113
+ ### Training Procedure
114
+
115
+ #### Preprocessing [optional]
116
+
117
+ The data was preprocessed to remove any sensitive or personally identifiable information. Text normalization and tokenization were applied to ensure consistency across the datasets.
118
+
119
+ #### Training Hyperparameters
120
+
121
+ - **Training regime:** fp16 mixed precision
122
+
123
+ #### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
124
+
125
+ - **Training time:** [More Information Needed]
126
+ - **Model size:** [More Information Needed]
127
+ - **Dataset size:** [More Information Needed]
128
+
129
+ ## Evaluation
130
+
131
+ ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
132
+
133
+ #### Testing Data
134
+
135
+ Testing was performed on both synthetic and real-world shell command and exploit datasets, focusing on their ability to correctly parse shell commands and identify exploit signatures.
136
+
137
+ #### Factors
138
+
139
+ The evaluation factors included:
140
+ - Model performance across different types of shell commands and exploits.
141
+ - Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score in detecting known exploits.
142
+
143
+ #### Metrics
144
+
145
+ Metrics used for evaluation include:
146
+ - **Accuracy**: Percentage of correct predictions made by the model.
147
+ - **Precision**: The number of relevant instances among the retrieved instances.
148
+ - **Recall**: The number of relevant instances that were retrieved.
149
+ - **F1-score**: The harmonic mean of precision and recall.
150
+
151
+ ### Results
152
+
153
+ The model performs well on standard shell command parsing tasks and exploit detection, with high accuracy for common exploits. However, its performance may degrade on newer or less common exploits.
154
+
155
+ #### Summary
156
+
157
+ The model is well-suited for cybersecurity applications involving shell command and exploit detection. While it excels in these areas, users should monitor its performance for emerging threats and unusual attack patterns.
158
+
159
+ ## Model Examination [optional]
160
+
161
+ Relevant interpretability work for this model is ongoing. Future research will focus on understanding why the model makes specific predictions and improving its interpretability.
162
+
163
+ ## Environmental Impact
164
+
165
+ Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
166
+
167
+ - **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
168
+ - **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
169
+ - **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
170
+ - **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
171
+ - **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
172
+
173
+ ## Technical Specifications [optional]
174
+
175
+ ### Model Architecture and Objective
176
+
177
+ This model utilizes transformer-based architecture with a focus on optimizing the understanding of shell commands and cybersecurity exploits.
178
+
179
+ ### Compute Infrastructure
180
+
181
+ The model was trained on [specify hardware and infrastructure used, e.g., GPUs, TPUs, cloud services].
182
+
183
+ #### Hardware
184
+
185
+ - [More Information Needed]
186
+
187
+ #### Software
188
+
189
+ - [More Information Needed]
190
+
191
+ ## Citation [optional]
192
+
193
+ If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section.
194
+
195
+ **BibTeX:**
196
+
197
+ [More Information Needed]
198
+
199
+ **APA:**
200
+
201
+ [More Information Needed]
202
+
203
+ ## Glossary [optional]
204
+
205
+ Terms like "shell command", "exploit", and "cybersecurity" may be used frequently in this model's context. Further definitions will help readers understand model performance.
206
+
207
+ ## More Information [optional]
208
+
209
+ [More Information Needed]
210
+
211
+ ## Model Card Authors [optional]
212
+
213
+ [More Information Needed]
214
+
215
+ ## Model Card Contact
216
+
217
+ For more information, please contact [Contact Information Needed].