Update README.md

README.md

@@ -34,11 +34,12 @@ Assessment:
 - 25%: Hints of moist. Moistral's style shows up from time to time. It cooks very slowly and the *moist* moments may not be cooked with the signature moist.
 - 10%: Moisty. Moistral's style is emergent. Cooking duration varies here, but there's *usually* some pacing involved. Moist moments have a good amount of the signature moist.
 - 5%: Quite moist. Moistral's style is apparent. Cooks quickly half the time and it definitely has the signature Moistral moist writing. Logic is still very strong at this point.
-- 2.5%: Still testing. TBD.
+- 2.5%: **(Not Recommended)** Very moist. Moistral's style is dominant but still coherent. Very picky with the prompts, it seems. Cooks all the time. Mositral problems start to emerge very noticably. Logic is faltering, with one foot out the door.
 
 Summary
 - 50% and 25% are seemingly more Fimbulvetr than Moistral. It might not be a bad thing if you want Fimbulvetr with some extra flavor.
 - 10% and 5% if you want the **MOIST**. 5% if you want very moist logic and writing, 10% if you just want a lot of moist moments.
+- 2.5% is **MOIST** at its purest, *sometimes functional* state... That is, if you can get it to work properly. YMMV, broken with the wrong prompt - and when it works, it's as if a tweaked up, schizo writer from *Brazz3rs* wrote the story. 
 
 Nutshell: All of them are very coherent. Lower percentages = More moist logic & writing.